From 59e3a82243ecbc5bb6133e8502d7c53c40a35794 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yang Jingyu Date: Thu, 3 Sep 2026 16:42:39 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/9] init organon --- .gitattributes | 19 +++ .gitignore | 39 +++++ AGENTS.md | 38 +++++ LICENSE | 21 +++ PHILOSOPHY.md | 126 ++++++++++++++++ README.md | 45 ++++++ docs/rationale.md | 142 ++++++++++++++++++ skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md | 36 +++++ skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md | 30 ++++ .../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md | 45 ++++++ skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md | 16 ++ skills/references/iteration.md | 48 ++++++ skills/references/validation.md | 80 ++++++++++ zh/AGENTS.md | 9 ++ zh/PHILOSOPHY.md | 126 ++++++++++++++++ zh/rationale.md | 142 ++++++++++++++++++ 16 files changed, 962 insertions(+) create mode 100644 .gitattributes create mode 100644 .gitignore create mode 100644 AGENTS.md create mode 100644 LICENSE create mode 100644 PHILOSOPHY.md create mode 100644 README.md create mode 100644 docs/rationale.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md create mode 100644 skills/references/iteration.md create mode 100644 skills/references/validation.md create mode 100644 zh/AGENTS.md create mode 100644 zh/PHILOSOPHY.md create mode 100644 zh/rationale.md diff --git a/.gitattributes b/.gitattributes new file mode 100644 index 0000000..65dab5b --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitattributes @@ -0,0 +1,19 @@ +# Normalize text files to LF in the repository. +* text=auto eol=lf + +# Keep the repository's source and data formats explicitly textual. +*.md text +*.py text +*.json text +*.jsonl text +*.yml text +*.yaml text +*.sh text +*.txt text + +# These files are intended for direct viewing, not diffing as source. +*.png binary +*.jpg binary +*.jpeg binary +*.gif binary +*.pdf binary diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e696458 --- /dev/null +++ b/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# Local project state +.local/ + +# Python +__pycache__/ +*.py[cod] +*$py.class +.Python +*.so +.venv/ +venv/ +env/ +ENV/ +pip-wheel-metadata/ +*.egg-info/ +build/ +dist/ + +# Python tooling +.pytest_cache/ +.mypy_cache/ +.ruff_cache/ +.tox/ +.nox/ +.coverage +.coverage.* +htmlcov/ + +# Operating system +.DS_Store +.AppleDouble +.LSOverride + +# Editor and IDE +.idea/ +.vscode/ + +# .local + diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..228cd08 --- /dev/null +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@ +# Working on Organon Core + +Read [PHILOSOPHY.md](PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, before assessing or changing this repository. It is the English authority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) explains the philosophy without adding core obligations. Skills implement context-specific methods and may be revised. + +For an input assessment, use [organon-core-assess](skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md). For philosophical absorption and its necessary synchronization, use [organon-core-absorb](skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md). Read their shared [iteration rules](skills/references/iteration.md) for external grilling, independent-first cross-validation, authorization, records, and stopping. Delegated reviewers return findings instead of recursively requesting review. + +Use [organon-core-principled-review](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) for full analysis when its stated trigger conditions apply. It owns the six-dimension method, including bounded review of its own output and criteria. Reuse findings with their standards and grounds; assess owns current philosophical compatibility judgments, while absorb owns philosophical adoption. Method findings do not automatically establish core conflicts, and principled review does not replace independent cross-validation. Routine narrow assessment and wording-only work retain their separate scope. + +The initiating agent owns independent skill and documentation maintenance under the shared iteration rules, combining the applicable review skills without treating that work as philosophical absorption. Those rules retain requirements, authorization, actual validation, wording, translation, independent review, and stopping checks. Use external grilling when explicitly requested or needed for material unresolved choices; its absence blocks only the dependent stage. + +For repository wording review, use [organon-core-wording-review](skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md). It checks wording quality only and is also used by `organon-core-absorb`. + +Keep changes precise and limited to their authorized scope. Preserve confirmed wording and meaning; a change to a philosophical commitment or its applicability requires the user's explicit decision, even if presented as an explanation. Existing authorization need not be requested again. + +For repository text you create or revise and for user-facing replies, use grammatically correct, precise, concise wording that is unambiguous in context. Use terms consistently and make referents, conditions, and scope clear. Remove repetition that adds no information, while retaining necessary qualifications. + +Define relevant [validation cases](skills/references/validation.md) before a method change and retain actual results and independent review locally. Update affected documents and links together. Do not represent file checks, agent agreement, or self-application as proof of philosophical correctness. + +Keep private inputs and iteration records under ignored `.local/`. The legacy archive is historical, not an active source of obligations. Preserve user configuration and original requirements. The delivered core and skills remain text-only; do not restore the legacy checker or release workflow as part of ordinary maintenance. + +## Remote publication authorization + +- Remote publication includes `git push` (branches or tags), release publication, + PR merges, deployments, and uploads of project artifacts to remote destinations. +- An explicit user request or prior approval authorizes the stated action, + target, and scope. Reuse that authorization unless withdrawn or superseded; + do not ask again for the same work. +- General implementation requests, credentials, and tool availability do not + authorize publication. Approval to push does not by itself authorize a force + push, merge, deployment, or publication to another target. +- When authorization is missing, first complete authorized preparation and + relevant checks. Present the reviewable result, exact destination, scope, + action, and known consequential effects, then request confirmation once. + Explain that this rule requires authorization for the uncovered publication. +- Execute only the authorized scope. If the action, target, or scope materially + changes, obtain authorization for that change. Silence is not confirmation. +- Continue authorized preparation and read-only inspection while awaiting a + decision. This rule does not require confirmation for every remote interaction. diff --git a/LICENSE b/LICENSE new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1f7a443 --- /dev/null +++ b/LICENSE @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +MIT License + +Copyright (c) 2026 Yang Jingyu + +Permission is hereby granted, free of charge, to any person obtaining a copy +of this software and associated documentation files (the "Software"), to deal +in the Software without restriction, including without limitation the rights +to use, copy, modify, merge, publish, distribute, sublicense, and/or sell +copies of the Software, and to permit persons to whom the Software is +furnished to do so, subject to the following conditions: + +The above copyright notice and this permission notice shall be included in all +copies or substantial portions of the Software. + +THE SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED "AS IS", WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR +IMPLIED, INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO THE WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY, +FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE AND NONINFRINGEMENT. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE +AUTHORS OR COPYRIGHT HOLDERS BE LIABLE FOR ANY CLAIM, DAMAGES OR OTHER +LIABILITY, WHETHER IN AN ACTION OF CONTRACT, TORT OR OTHERWISE, ARISING FROM, +OUT OF OR IN CONNECTION WITH THE SOFTWARE OR THE USE OR OTHER DEALINGS IN THE +SOFTWARE. diff --git a/PHILOSOPHY.md b/PHILOSOPHY.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..230c01f --- /dev/null +++ b/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +# Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds + +This is the current authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. + +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. + +## 1. Charter + +### 1.1 Overview + +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. + +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of application. The provisions below specify the precise conditions for each. + +### 1.2 Self-Transcendence + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. + +#### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation + +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. Regarding that expansion as worth pursuing constitutes an intrinsic orientation. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. + +#### 1.2.2 Non-finality + +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual breakthroughs. + +#### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits + +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Generation cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. + +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. + +### 1.3 Internal Consistency + +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. + +#### 1.3.1 Meaning + +“Held simultaneously” identifies the principles, judgments, and implications that need to hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, it cannot be represented as though nothing changed. + +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Differences under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. + +#### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits + +- Tension between different evaluations or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency permits revision of principles; it does not require a system to maintain its original views forever. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or omitting important questions. + +### 1.4 Reflexivity + +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. + +#### 1.4.1 Meaning + +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and alteration of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. + +#### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits + +- Equal application retains the conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- A revision’s being produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. + +## 2. Grounds + +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. + +### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment + +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessability requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. + +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inference | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | + +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. “Strength of a claim” does not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. + +### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement + +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. + +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. + +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. Whether an event can be replayed identically does not determine the standing of all grounds at once. + +### 2.3 Capability Claims + +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. + +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. + +### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives + +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. + +This choice provision retains an additional evaluative commitment: identity or status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. + +#### Conditions and Limits + +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for evaluation. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern internal methods. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the Grounds principle. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. + +## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms + +### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints + +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. + +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns why a claim receives support. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under them remain subject to the relevant core provisions. + +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends those requirements to these objects. The grounds and limits of Grounds must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. + +### 3.2 Necessary Terms + +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/README.md b/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..880125d --- /dev/null +++ b/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +# Organon Core + +Organon is a text-centered philosophical core: **Self-Transcendence, Internal Consistency, and Reflexivity**, with **Grounds** constraining judgments and including the additional commitment of **Openness to Alternative Implementations**. Capability definitions belong to applications rather than a uniform core standard. It expresses a position that can constrain judgments and construction across systems; it does not claim that every system already embodies it. + +## Read + +- [Philosophy](PHILOSOPHY.md) is the current English authority, including the meanings and limits of its provisions. +- [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) explains contributions, dependencies, counterexamples, and applications. It cannot independently add obligations to the core. +- Chinese translations are maintained under `zh/` for readability and follow the English authority. +- [Agent guidance](AGENTS.md) identifies how to work on this repository. The skills below are revisable applications under this repository's goals, not additional philosophical truths. + +## Use the skills + +| Skill | Purpose | Entrypoint | +| --- | --- | --- | +| `organon-core-assess` | Assess an input against the adopted philosophy, including applicability, grounds, conflicts, and minimal correction directions. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md) | +| `organon-core-absorb` | Decide whether input warrants revising the philosophy; develop, review, and implement authorized adoption with necessary synchronization. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md) | +| `organon-core-principled-review` | Review an object under six principles and stated standards; return findings, including bounded review of the method and criteria. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) | +| `organon-core-wording-review` | Review text for grammatical correctness, precision, ambiguity, terminology, redundancy, and necessary qualifications. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md) | + +Give an agent the relevant entrypoint and your input, for example: “Use `organon-core-assess` to assess this design under its stated assumptions,” or “Use `organon-core-absorb` to consider whether this counterexample warrants a change.” These skills use English instructions and respond in the user's language. They can be invoked separately but reference this repository's guidance; copying a skill folder alone does not make a standalone distribution. Load the entrypoint explicitly if the host does not discover this directory; no automatic installation or discovery is assumed. + +Use the real external `grilling` capability, directly or through `grill-me`, when explicitly requested or when material unresolved choices require it. Gather facts before questioning; a fully specified ordinary assessment needs neither dependency lookup nor an interview. When the required capability is unavailable, state which stage is incomplete and continue independent work. Cross-validation requires a different agent’s initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal; missing that capability leaves a provisional result, not completed cross-validation. + +[Principled review](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) defines the full-analysis triggers and six dimensions in one place. It distinguishes the object’s own commitments, the selected review standards, and the method’s constraints. Assess uses findings to judge current philosophical compatibility; absorb separately judges reasons for adoption. Method preferences do not automatically establish core conflicts. Both reuse findings when the triggers apply; ordinary narrow assessment keeps targeted checks, and wording-only work does not launch a full cycle. Principled review returns findings without invoking assess or absorb, editing the object, or adopting a revision. Its bounded self-check does not replace independent cross-validation required by absorption. + +`organon-core-wording-review` is a wording tool that can be invoked independently and is used by `organon-core-absorb`. It does not assess requirements, authorization, grounds, validation, philosophy, or bilingual correspondence. `organon-core-assess` retains its own judgment checks without invoking it. Wording review does not replace independent cross-validation. + +Ordinary assessment need not trigger absorption. Absorption defaults to a proposal and uses existing explicit authorization for changes; changing philosophical meaning requires the user's explicit decision. See [iteration and review](skills/references/iteration.md) and [validation cases](skills/references/validation.md). + +When describing adoption of Organon, we recommend identifying the philosophical text, the scope adopted, and the arrangement for receiving updates. Borrowing ideas or adopting selected provisions does not amount to adopting the complete philosophy, including its meanings and conditions of application. A downstream system may retain a fixed text or agree in advance to follow upstream updates; whether an update takes effect depends on that system’s chosen arrangement. These are usage recommendations, not a registration requirement or an additional philosophical commitment. They do not change this repository’s requirement for the user’s explicit decision on changes to philosophical meaning, and an update’s adoption does not establish its correctness. + +## Maintain and assess + +The initiating agent coordinates independent skill and documentation maintenance under the shared iteration rules, using the applicable assessment, principled-review, wording, and translation checks. Absorb handles philosophical adoption and the synchronization that decision requires, not general maintenance. + +Design, implementation, validation, and revision share a concise record of the object and baseline, objective, grounds, alternatives, assessment, and decision. Repository iteration records stay under ignored `.local/iterations/`; ordinary assessments may stay in the conversation. Only selected, authorized general arguments and cases enter maintained documentation. + +Validation examines actual reasoning and behavior, including justified non-absorption, relevant variations, method revision, cross-system applications, and alternative implementations. File checks establish textual integrity only. Self-assessment, independent review, and agreement do not prove the philosophy or a method universally correct. + +The former `ORGANON.md`, checker, fixtures, governance records, and CI were retired together. Their original relative paths and archive hash inventory are retained locally in `.local/archived/to_absorb/legacy-core/`; the archive is ignored and is not included in a fresh clone. Earlier tracked versions remain in Git history. Completed local requirements, discussions, and iteration records are collected under `.local/archived/`, with an index in its `README.md`. + +This core and its skills contain no runtime scripts, executable checker, or automated release mechanism. One-off file integrity checks used during maintenance do not become philosophical requirements. + +Licensed under [MIT](LICENSE). diff --git a/docs/rationale.md b/docs/rationale.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0722cc8 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/rationale.md @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +# Organon Rationale + +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). It does not add obligations to the philosophy. + +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. + +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Generative Drive | Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. | Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. | +| Internal Consistency and Reflexivity | Charter, unchanged. | Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. | +| Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries | Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. | General requirements and limits retain their normative force. The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. | +| Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation | Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. | The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations | Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. | The provision and its conditions remain. Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. | +| Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships | Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. | Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. | + +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. + +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Self-Transcendence | Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. | Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. | +| Internal Consistency | If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. This supports examining their compatibility. | A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. | +| Reflexivity | A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. | Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. | +| Grounds | When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. | Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations | If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. | Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. They are not disallowed; the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. | + +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. + +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. The current core withdraws that uniform definition. Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. + +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. + +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. + +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. Each choice needs contextual reasons. These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. + +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. + +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. + +## 3. Removal Check + +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | +| --- | --- | +| Self-Transcendence | The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. | +| Internal Consistency | There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. | +| Reflexivity | Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. | +| Grounds | The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds | General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. | + +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. + +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. These examine the meaning of the philosophy; they are not steps a system is required to execute. + +| Case | Judgment and limits | +| --- | --- | +| A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. | Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. | +| A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. | Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. | +| A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. | It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. | +| Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. | Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. | +| Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. | This violates internal consistency. Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. | +| A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. | This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. | +| Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. | Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. Grounds requires examination of the support relation. | +| A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. | It can be assessed as a value commitment. Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. | +| A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. | It may provide corresponding limited support. Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. | +| A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. | Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. | +| An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. | The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. These capability definitions come from the application. | +| An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. | Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. | +| An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; the same reliable black box cannot do so. | Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. | +| After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. | A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. | +| A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. | The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. | +| An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. | Conventional use is not the sole ground. Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. | +| An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. | Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. | +| Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. | This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. | +| A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. | Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. | +| An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. | Renaming alone adds no support. Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. | + +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. + +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. + +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; they cannot replace philosophical argument. These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. + +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +The following are hypothetical applications. Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; their conclusions hold within those premises. + +### 6.1 Research Team + +| Argument element | Application | +| --- | --- | +| Claim | A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. | +| Additional premises | The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; the material does not establish population prevalence. | +| Inference | Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. | +| Counterexample | An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. | +| Conclusion | The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; the number of labels alone cannot. Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. | + +### 6.2 Software System + +| Argument element | Application | +| --- | --- | +| Claim | A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. | +| Additional premises | The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. | +| Inference | Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. | +| Counterexample | Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. | +| Conclusion | The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. | + +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. + +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. + +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | +| --- | --- | --- | +| English authority with a corresponding Chinese version | The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. | No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. Another project could select a different language. | +| A text-centered core and script-free skills | The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. | Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; their absence here is a design choice. | +| `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` | Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. | Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. | +| `organon-core-principled-review` | A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. | Findings retain their standards and limits; they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. | +| External `grill-me/grilling` | Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. | A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. | +| An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal | A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. | Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. A consensus is not proof. A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. | +| Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations | This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. | These are contextual method requirements. A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. | +| A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment | Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. | A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. | + +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. + +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md b/skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ba16a68 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md @@ -0,0 +1,36 @@ +--- +name: organon-core-absorb +description: Decide whether input warrants revising Organon’s philosophy; develop a concrete proposal, address feedback, obtain independent review and the required user decision, then implement authorized adoption and necessary synchronization. Independent skill optimization and general documentation maintenance use the shared maintenance workflow. +--- + +# Organon Core Absorb + +Read the [English philosophical authority](../../PHILOSOPHY.md) and the [shared iteration, maintenance, dependency, and authority rules](../references/iteration.md). Communicate in the user's language. This skill coordinates philosophical absorption; absorption is not a universal obligation inferred from self-transcendence. + +## Establish the question and current relationship + +Identify the input, current philosophical baseline, alleged gap, and intended contribution. Read the relevant existing material before assuming a gap. Establish the input’s grounds, conditions, and support limits. Use external grilling when explicitly requested or needed for material unknowns and trade-offs, after gathering discoverable facts. + +Arrange independent review under the shared protocol: the reviewer receives the raw input, baseline, objectives, and necessary context before the author’s candidate or conclusions. It records its initial judgment before those are disclosed. The author can develop the proposal independently while that review proceeds. + +Use [organon-core-assess](../organon-core-assess/SKILL.md) to establish existing coverage, compatibility, conflicts, and support limits, reusing a relevant assessment when the baseline and evidence remain applicable. Keep this judgment separate from whether revision is warranted. Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict with a current commitment does not by itself refute an argument for changing it. Name the commitment challenged and examine the reasons without silently substituting the candidate as the baseline. + +## Develop the candidate and review its reasons + +Compare retaining the current form with meaningful alternatives: adding, clarifying, revising, merging, or withdrawing philosophical content. Explain what understanding or constructive capability would be gained, or what unsupported or conflicting content would be corrected. Novelty, volume, or a useful but already covered example need not warrant a change. Give reasons for no absorption or deferral when appropriate; a covered input with no full-review trigger can end with that bounded conclusion. + +Specify concrete provisions, their meanings and application limits, the grounds for changing them, additional premises, alternatives, and consequences. Identify which existing commitments would remain or be withdrawn. A hypothetical revised whole is a candidate, not the adopted baseline; old and new commitments need not remain simultaneously held after an explicit withdrawal. + +Use [organon-core-principled-review](../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) when its full-review triggers apply. Review the substantive candidate, the reasons for adoption, the relationships within the proposed whole, and this absorption method and its criteria. Reuse findings with their standards and support limits; supplement them for material changes instead of duplicating unchanged checks. A method preference is not automatically a core obligation, and completing the review does not establish that adoption is warranted. + +Distinguish philosophical change from necessary synchronization. A change to a commitment, meaning, or applicability belongs to the core and requires the user’s explicit decision. Update rationale, translations, or skills where that adopted change requires it; reasons and examples do not independently add core obligations. An explanatory edit that changes a required judgment is a possible philosophical change. Independent skill optimization or general documentation work belongs to shared maintenance, even if the absorption discussion revealed it; do not treat discovering useful work as authorization to perform it. + +## Resolve feedback, decide, and implement + +Present the candidate and its consequences, gather material feedback, and revise or retain unresolved questions with reasons. Define acceptance situations and counterexamples before implementation. Apply the shared maintenance checks to the proposal and its necessary synchronization, including requirements, authorization, actual validation evidence, wording, and translation correspondence. Method changes retain the repository’s requirements to explain their formation or revision and assess a relevant variation. + +After the independent initial judgment is recorded, provide the candidate and grounds for cross-review. The reviewer must address both the relationship to the original philosophy, using assess, and whether the reasons for revision are supported, using principled review when applicable. An assess result alone does not establish the case for adoption. Address material objections or preserve reasoned disagreement; delegated reviewers return findings without opening another review chain. + +Default to a concrete, reviewable proposal. After the required review and user decision, execute changes covered by explicit authorization; do not ask again for the same authorized scope. New or materially changed philosophical meaning needs an explicit decision covering it. Keep the current baseline until the revision is actually adopted. Verify the resulting text and required synchronization against the reviewed, authorized change; rerun affected cases when material edits or failures warrant it. Producing a method text alone establishes neither improvement nor capability beyond what that evidence supports. + +Record no absorption, deferral, proposed change, or completed adoption with its grounds, authorization, actual changes, and remaining limits. Use the shared bounded self-assessment and stopping rules. Neither agreement between agents nor more iterations proves correctness. Consult [validation cases](../references/validation.md) for development and comparison after independent test responses have been recorded. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md b/skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f142980 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@ +--- +name: organon-core-assess +description: Assess a given claim, design, method, or artifact against the current Organon philosophy, explaining applicability, grounds, conflicts, and minimal correction directions. Use for philosophical assessment, including assessment of Organon itself; philosophical absorption is a separate decision. +--- + +# Organon Core Assess + +Read the [English philosophical authority](../../PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, and the [shared iteration and dependency rules](../references/iteration.md). Write in the user's language. This skill is a revisable application of the philosophy, not a further philosophical principle. + +## Assess the input + +Identify the actual object and requested judgment. Fix the philosophical baseline and distinguish the input's claims, assumptions, objectives, and scope. Treat Organon as the adopted basis for this assessment, not as a universally proven truth or evidence that the input’s author has adopted it. Distinguish conflict with this external assessment basis from contradiction within the input’s own commitments. An input that challenges it can expose a question for revision without changing the current baseline. + +Determine which provisions apply and why. Distinguish empirical claims, inferences, and value commitments. Trace material judgments to the relevant provision and additional premises; make the support and its limits articulable. A report or artifact need not individually exhibit every commitment of a system. Mark a materially relevant unknown as unknown, not as compliance, conflict, or inapplicability. + +Examine whether judgments under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope can hold together; whether their grounds support their strength and scope; and, where relevant, whether implementation choices meet the choice provision under Grounds. For capability claims, identify the capability actually claimed, its application-specific definition, and the evidence supporting it. Do not impose a uniform mastery or generation standard. Distinguish external grounds for a capability claim from the assessed system’s ability to explain its own process; require the latter when the application calls for it. Keep orientation distinct from achievement, reliable output from understanding its production, local agreement from overall equivalence, and self-application from self-proof. + +Use [organon-core-principled-review](../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) when its full-analysis trigger conditions apply. Reuse its findings in the judgment below; do not duplicate its definitions or rerun unchanged checks. This skill owns the current philosophical compatibility judgment: connect each claimed core conflict to an applicable provision and its grounds. Keep additional method findings or preferences distinct; they do not automatically constitute philosophical violations. Routine narrow assessment keeps the targeted checks above. + +Obtain discoverable facts before invoking external grilling when explicitly requested or needed for decision-critical unknowns. Follow its questions through the relevant decisions; do not add a ritual interview when the supplied grounds suffice. Missing dependencies and unanswered material choices remain explicit under the shared rules. + +## Return a bounded judgment + +Explain what is compatible, in conflict, insufficiently supported, or unresolved, with the conditions on each judgment. These can coexist within one input; do not collapse them into a universal pass/fail verdict or confidence score. Offer the smallest correction direction that addresses the diagnosed issue. Do not rewrite the input or modify Organon unless that work is authorized. + +Assess your own conclusion and method under the same relevant principles: look for omitted conditions, unsupported inferences, self-exemptions, and a counterexample that could change the judgment. Reporting no conflict does not establish correctness or sufficient support. + +If the input gives reasons to question the philosophy, identify the affected commitment without changing the baseline. Use [organon-core-absorb](../organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md) only when the task calls for a philosophical absorption decision. A compatibility judgment is not an adoption decision: compatibility alone does not warrant addition, and conflict alone does not defeat reasons for revision. Independent skill or documentation changes belong to the shared maintenance workflow. Ordinary assessment can end without absorption. For a cross-validation assignment, follow the shared independent-first review protocol and return findings to the initiating agent; do not recursively commission a reviewer. + +Use the concise six-part record when useful; repository iterations retain it locally. The [validation cases](../references/validation.md) guide skill development and subsequent comparison with recorded test responses, not predetermined answers to arbitrary inputs. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md b/skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1de4f58 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +--- +name: organon-core-principled-review +description: Review claims, designs, methods, or systems using six review principles under stated goals, scope, and standards. Return grounded findings for structural, self-, or six-dimension analysis and substantive revisions; assess owns the current Organon compatibility judgment, and absorb owns philosophical adoption. +--- + +# Organon Core Principled Review + +Read the [English philosophical authority](../../PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, and the [shared iteration rules](../references/iteration.md). Respond in the user's language. This skill is a revisable analysis method, not six additional universal philosophical obligations or a uniform capability standard. + +## When to use + +Run the complete analysis when structural, self-, or six-dimension analysis is explicitly requested, or when a proposal materially changes philosophical commitments, applicability, method steps, evaluation criteria, or the allocation of their responsibilities. Routine narrow assessment retains its targeted checks. A wording-only task uses the wording skill without a full analysis cycle. + +`organon-core-assess` owns judgments of compatibility with the adopted philosophy; `organon-core-absorb` owns philosophical adoption and its necessary synchronization. Shared maintenance handles independent skill and documentation revisions. Callers reuse these findings when the conditions above apply. This skill returns analysis to its caller; it does not invoke either skill, edit the object, or adopt a revision. It does not replace independent cross-validation required by the caller. + +## Fix the object and grounds + +Identify the object, claims, objectives, scope, and application requirements. Distinguish the object’s own commitments, the standards selected for this review, and the constraints on the review method itself. Organon constrains this method; its use does not mean that the object has adopted Organon. When comparing an object with Organon, identify that external basis rather than treating a difference as the object’s internal contradiction. Distinguish facts, inferences, values, and method choices. Keep each declared baseline fixed: a proposed standard is not already the standard used to assess it. + +Gather discoverable facts before questioning the user. Use the real external `grilling` capability when explicitly requested or when material unresolved choices require it, under the shared dependency rules. Continue checks independent of pending answers. Missing evidence, an unanswered choice, and non-applicability are different conditions. Do not invent a goal or preference to finish a comparison. + +## Six dimensions + +For a full invocation, address each dimension’s applicability, grounds, judgment, and limits. These are review principles, not six additional core commitments. Identify the applicable standard for each material finding; a difference from a method preference does not by itself establish a philosophical conflict. In particular, an object’s lack of generative orientation is not automatically a defect under its own goals. Use the following definitions as the shared method; callers should link here rather than maintain separate versions. + +| Dimension | Analysis responsibility | Limits | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Internal consistency | Compare judgments and implications under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope. | Value tension, different conditions, and explicitly withdrawn judgments are not automatically contradictions. | +| Minimal completeness | Within the stated objective and scope, look for omitted necessary situations and examine what would be lost by deleting or merging apparently redundant content. | Preserve necessary conditions, obligations, and distinctions. Brevity is not sufficiency; coverage of the examined cases does not establish domain completeness, formal independence, or a globally minimal form. Focus removal checks on plausible redundancies, not every pair of sentences. | +| External adequacy | Examine whether claims hold for or fit relevant external facts, objects, objectives, and actual constraints. | Missing relevant external information leaves the affected judgment unresolved; available grounds insufficient for the claim warrant a support limitation. Neither is non-applicability. Agreement is not a substitute for grounds, and not every claim requires an experiment or third-party endorsement. | +| Falsifiability: rebuttal and revision conditions | For empirical claims, examine what evidence could count against them and under what conditions. For inferences, examine support relations and counterexamples. For value commitments, examine reasons, limits, consequences, and relevant criticism or grounds for revision. | Do not require empirical refutation of every value commitment or invent a condition that must change someone's values. Distinguish these forms of criticism rather than treating them as one empirical test. | +| Self-transcendence | For applicable systems, examine generative orientation, non-finality, and conditions for revising their organization, methods, or principles. When an achievement is claimed, compare its baseline, contribution, and grounds. | A static artifact need not itself have a system's orientation. Justified stability or external assistance is not failure; more documents or a claim of breakthrough does not establish expansion. Apply the core's conditions rather than impose improvement on every action. | +| Occam's razor review | Compare the assumptions, entities, or rule complexity of candidates with comparable support, explanatory reach, coverage, and satisfaction of relevant constraints. Prefer avoiding unnecessary complexity when those conditions are comparable. | Word count is not a complexity measure by default. A conditional preference for adoption does not establish greater truth. State which complexity dimensions matter; when they trade off without grounds for a preference, retain the unresolved comparison rather than invent a score. | + +Minimal completeness examines the object's coverage and redundant content; Occam review examines a comparative preference among candidates. With no adequately comparable alternative, a proposed simplification remains a candidate to assess, not an established comparative advantage. A deletion that removes an application limit is not justified merely because it shortens the text. + +## Return findings and examine this analysis + +State what is supported, in conflict, insufficiently supported, unresolved, or inapplicable, with reasons for the distinctions. State the standard supporting each material judgment, including applicable core provisions and additional premises where relevant. Return findings for the caller to use; assess must establish whether they warrant a current philosophical compatibility judgment, and absorb must separately establish a case for adoption. Consolidate each actual issue with its grounds, effect, and smallest correction direction; one issue may concern several dimensions without becoming several defects. Do not produce a composite score or infer quality from completing six headings. + +Apply the relevant dimensions to this report, the analysis method used, and its evaluation criteria within the same bounded review. Check for unsupported conclusions, omissions, hidden preferences, self-exemptions, and a counterexample that could change the judgment. Reuse those results rather than generating a separate full report recursively. + +Criteria may be criticized, but changing them creates a proposed new version and a new judgment; preserve the old judgment and explain the difference. A proposed philosophical change still requires the user's explicit decision. Report possible method or core revisions to the caller without silently adopting them or reopening settled choices merely to seek approval again. + +Use the shared record and stopping rules. For repository work, retain actual evidence under ignored `.local/`; ordinary analysis may stay in the conversation. Continue a review only for new grounds, counterexamples, or material revisions. State remaining unknowns without declaring success. File checks, self-application, and agreement do not prove philosophical correctness or universal method effectiveness. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md b/skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a48fcaa --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md @@ -0,0 +1,16 @@ +--- +name: organon-core-wording-review +description: Review repository text for grammatical correctness, precision, ambiguity, consistent terminology, unnecessary repetition, and preserved qualifications. Use when wording quality is the task; it does not assess requirements, authorization, grounds, validation, philosophy, or bilingual correspondence. +--- + +# Organon Core Wording Review + +Use this skill for text that is being created or revised. Read the text in context and review one language at a time. This is a wording tool, not a philosophical assessment, maintenance audit, translation review, or independent review. `organon-core-assess` does not invoke it for ordinary input assessment. + +## Review wording + +Check grammar, precision, ambiguity, terminology and referent consistency, unnecessary repetition, and whether necessary conditions or qualifications remain explicit. Distinguish a supported defect from a stylistic preference. Do not infer an issue from a different but equally precise phrasing. + +Report each supported finding with its location, the wording problem, its impact on interpretation, and the smallest correction. Provide revised wording only when it resolves the identified problem. A no-change result is appropriate when no supported correction remains. If the text is part of a translation pair, leave meaning correspondence to the repository's translation guidance rather than deciding it here. + +Apply a correction only when the caller has authorized editing. Do not use this skill to decide whether a requirement was met, whether a change is in scope, whether a claim has sufficient grounds, whether validation was executed, or whether a philosophical judgment is correct. It does not replace independent cross-validation or a user's decision. diff --git a/skills/references/iteration.md b/skills/references/iteration.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e1bd7f2 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/references/iteration.md @@ -0,0 +1,48 @@ +# Iteration and cross-validation + +Use this record for designing, implementing, assessing, or revising an Organon skill or repository text. It organizes inspectable grounds; filling it out is not proof. The [core](../../PHILOSOPHY.md) supplies philosophical commitments, while this method implements the repository's chosen objectives and constraints. Explaining method revisions and testing relevant variations serve this repository's reviewability objectives; they do not impose a uniform capability definition on every assessed system. The initiating agent reads [validation](validation.md) to select cases before a method change. Independent test agents must record their initial responses before seeing the expected boundaries. + +## Six-part record + +1. **Object and baseline.** Identify the input, the adopted philosophy used, and relevant text versions or snapshots. Keep the baseline fixed within an assessment. Distinguish a proposed replacement from the baseline it challenges. +2. **Problem and objective.** State the decision to resolve, relevant conditions, and what would count as a useful improvement. Stability or no absorption may be justified. +3. **Grounds and additional premises.** Cite applicable provisions; distinguish observations, inferences, value commitments, and application choices. State support limits and explain non-applicability when material. Do not force every provision onto every input. +4. **Candidates and trade-offs.** Compare the meaningful alternatives, including retaining the current form. Explain the destination and distinctive contribution of any absorption. Distinguish a minimal correction to an input from a change to Organon. +5. **Assessment and counterexamples.** State expected boundaries before implementation, examine actual responses and relevant variations, and record self-assessment and independent review separately. Assess outputs, the method, and its revision criteria. Explain failures and the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +6. **Decision and remaining questions.** State the conclusion, applicable authorization, changes made or still proposed, and remaining uncertainty. For another round, identify what new grounds or justified revision warrant continuing, and preserve the preceding judgment and material differences. + +Use concise prose; ordinary assessments need not expand into six verbose sections. Repository changes use an inspectable record under `.local/iterations/`; ordinary input assessments may remain in the conversation. Only selected, authorized, general arguments or cases enter maintained documentation. Do not place private inputs in public examples. + +## Full review and reuse + +[organon-core-principled-review](../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) is the shared source for full-analysis triggers and the six-dimension method. It distinguishes the object’s commitments, the selected review standards, and the method’s own constraints. Assess owns current philosophical compatibility judgments; absorb owns the case for philosophical adoption. Both reuse findings with their grounds and standards when applicable; targeted assessments and wording-only tasks do not acquire a full-analysis requirement merely by using this record. The principled-review skill returns findings to its caller without invoking assess or absorb. Its examination of its report, method, and criteria remains within one bounded review and does not replace the caller's independent cross-validation. + +Criticizing criteria does not change the fixed baseline of the current assessment. A proposed change forms a new version and requires a separate judgment, retaining the prior result and reasons for the difference. The authority and stopping rules below also apply to principled review. + +## Repository maintenance + +The initiating agent owns independent skill, rationale, translation, and other documentation maintenance under [AGENTS.md](../../AGENTS.md); it is not philosophical absorption merely because repository text changes. Use assess for current philosophical compatibility, principled review under its stated triggers, and [wording review](../organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md) for wording. If maintenance reveals a proposed change to a core commitment, meaning, or applicability, identify it and use absorb when the task calls for that decision. Do not silently extend the authorized scope. + +Before editing, preserve the relevant current worktree baseline and original requirements, including existing user changes. State acceptance cases and obtain independent initial assessment before disclosing the author’s candidate. Retain direct checks of task requirements, scope and authorization, grounds, and actual validation evidence. Review wording separately from philosophical judgments; apply [translation guidance](../../zh/AGENTS.md) to bilingual correspondence. Synchronize affected documents and links without importing private inputs into maintained examples. + +For method changes, explain the formation or revision and apply the candidate to a relevant variation. Give independent test agents raw cases without the expected boundaries, preserve their actual responses, then compare. These are contextual requirements for reviewable method changes, not universal capability definitions. File checks and planned tests do not establish actual behavior or improvement. Keep local evidence of checks performed, failures, narrow corrections, and reruns; repeat checks only when material changes or unresolved failures justify them. Wording-only maintenance retains these applicable checks without acquiring a full six-dimension review. + +After required cross-review, apply changes within existing authorization and verify the actual result against the reviewed proposal. Preserve findings for the output, method, and criteria within one bounded self-check; do not create a recursive review chain. The authority, record, and stopping rules apply to maintenance as well as absorption. + +## Independent cross-validation + +The initiating agent owns the iteration. Cross-validation requires a different agent, not the initiator adopting a second role. Give that agent the raw input, fixed philosophical baseline, objectives, and necessary contextual facts first. Withhold the author's candidate, rationale, and expected verdicts until the reviewer records its own assessment. Then share them and request comparison, counterexamples, and a reasoned account of any disagreement. If reviewing an existing skill as the object, its text is raw input; withhold the new proposed revision and the author's verdict. + +For an absorption candidate, independently examine both its relationship to the original philosophy using `organon-core-assess` and the grounds for revising that philosophy, using `organon-core-principled-review` when applicable. Compatibility is not sufficient for adoption, and conflict alone does not defeat revision reasons. For independent repository maintenance, review the proposed method or text through the maintenance workflow above rather than broadening absorb. Ordinary assessment does not automatically require absorption. A delegated reviewer returns findings to the initiator rather than spawning another review chain. Subsequent reviews may reuse the recorded independent first judgment and must distinguish new evidence from information learned through comparison. + +If an independent reviewer is unavailable, retain a provisional result and state that cross-validation is incomplete. Do not certify a candidate as cross-validated or adopt it through this method before that review. Different agents may share blind spots, and consensus cannot replace support. The user decides unresolved material trade-offs; do not silently choose a different philosophical commitment to secure agreement. + +## Dependency, authority, and stopping + +Use the externally available `grilling` capability when explicitly requested or when material unresolved choices require user input, directly or through the `grill-me` entrypoint. Gather discoverable facts first. Resolve the capability by name and read its actual instructions, following the entrypoint to its target. Do not hard-code a machine path, silently install it, or replace it with an in-repository imitation. Without an explicit request or a material unresolved choice, no dependency lookup or interview is required. If a required capability is unavailable, report it and pause the requested grilling or dependent decision stage; continue independent checks and fact gathering. Missing grilling does not supply answers or prevent a fully specified ordinary assessment. + +Within these skills, apply grilling's design tree to unresolved choices that materially affect the current task. Do not ask users to supply discoverable facts, reopen settled choices, or require a separate final confirmation merely because grilling was invoked. Once those choices are resolved, continue only within existing authorization and after other prerequisites, including required cross-validation, are satisfied. An unanswered material choice remains unresolved; stopping an iteration does not supply an answer or authorization. + +Default to a concrete proposal. Existing explicit authorization permits changes within its scope; do not require repeated approval for the same authorized work. Changes to philosophical meaning need the user's explicit decision, including changes hidden in definitions, translations, or examples. A candidate does not become the baseline merely because an agent generated or approved it. If English and Chinese disagree, follow the English authority; do not silently reinterpret the English text to reconcile them. + +Stop when the relevant question is resolved, or when no new grounds or justified revision warrant continuing. New grounds may include a better argument, a counterexample, or a clarified premise, not only new observations. Report unresolved disagreement or missing support without declaring success. Progress is not the number of rounds, documents, or accepted additions; a revision needs a discernible contribution under the stated objectives. diff --git a/skills/references/validation.md b/skills/references/validation.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c94aca4 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/references/validation.md @@ -0,0 +1,80 @@ +# Validation cases + +These cases examine the assessment, absorption, principled-review, and wording-review skills under their stated objectives and the applicable [philosophy](../../PHILOSOPHY.md). They are assessment material, not additional philosophical obligations or a requirement to run every case on every input. The retained philosophical cases and cross-system arguments are in [rationale](../../docs/rationale.md). + +Define the relevant cases before changing a skill. Give a test agent only the raw request, necessary context, and skill; withhold the expected boundaries below until it has recorded its response. Preserve the response before comparing it with expectations. Check the reasoning and material choices rather than exact wording. Record actual failures, narrow corrections, and reruns using [iteration](iteration.md). + +| Case | Raw request or condition | Expected boundary | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Supported vs compatible | A team says: “Our consistent rules prove our empirical assumptions correct.” Assess this claim. | Distinguish consistency from empirical support; articulate the inference gap without inventing observations. | +| Applicability | Assess one verifiable, unreproduced failure report; it makes no claim to be a generative system. | Limited evidence may be relevant; do not reject it for failing to exhibit every philosophical commitment. | +| Value vs fact | A group values broader understanding but has no numerical measure proving that value universally necessary. | Assess the commitment's reasons and limits; neither require numerical proof of a value nor treat declaration as sufficient support. | +| Relevant variation | Compare random systems whose individual outputs differ but whose distributional claims are specified. | Examine evidence for those specified claims; do not demand identical outcomes or assert distributional stability without evidence. | +| Compatible but redundant | Absorb “a claim's scope must not exceed its grounds” as a new principle. | Recognize existing coverage by Grounds; compatibility alone does not establish a need for addition. | +| Appropriate destination | Consider one new failure example illustrating an existing limitation. | Compare retaining a case with changing a principle; useful content need not enter the core, and even a case needs a contribution. | +| Core challenge | An input argues that an implementation's established status alone should always establish its priority. | Identify the challenge to the choice commitment under Grounds; assess the argument without silently changing the baseline. Any core revision needs the user's decision. | +| Reliable black box | An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. External evidence supports performance under relevant variations; the system cannot explain its internal generation process. Assess its capability and any claim to understand that process. | Do not automatically disqualify the specified capability for lack of internal explanation, or infer understanding from output alone. Assess the external grounds and claimed scope. | +| Explanatory application | The same system is assessed under an explicit application requirement to understand and explain the grounds and limits of method formation, and cannot provide that required explanation. | Retain the application requirement; reliable output alone does not satisfy it. Do not turn the contextual requirement into a uniform core definition. | +| Explanation scope | A system cannot explain its internal computation, but can give supported reasons for method formation and its limits. The application requires only that latter account. | Do not equate explaining formation reasons and limits with explaining internal computation; assess the account actually required. | +| Limited output capability | A system claims only that it can produce this method text on this given input, and actually produces it. | The output can support that limited capability; it does not automatically support broader reliability, understanding, or improvement. Do not categorically exclude output evidence. | +| Quantity vs capability | A system supplies one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. | Count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. Require the capability's meaning and relevant support. | +| Definition change | After failing a capability criterion, the author narrows the definition and claims the original judgment passed unchanged. | Distinguish a new claim from support for the old one; do not conceal changed definitions or retroactively certify the original claim. | +| Capability in context | A skill claims it can assess judgments under their stated assumptions, but only recites principles and treats different assumptions as the same question. | Identify the failure relative to the claimed assessment capability and Internal Consistency; do not impose a uniform mastery hierarchy. | +| Method revision | An old method compares only answer accuracy. New input shows the same accuracy but different ability to explain and adapt methods; advise how to revise the comparison method. | Form or revise a method with explicit grounds, applicability, limits, and a counterexample. Identify which capability differences matter under the application objectives rather than assume explanation always deserves priority. Test a further relevant variation as this repository’s method requirement, not a universal capability definition. | +| Status vs reason | An established method is preferred for verified compatibility needs. | The convention is not the sole reason; assess the stated needs rather than mandate novelty. | +| Self-revision evidence | Organon revises a skill from checking output agreement to also checking the scope of capability claims, then claims improvement solely from a new file and agent agreement. Assess and apply a correction in a research-team variation. | Require a discernible contribution and support for the claimed improvement. Explain and apply the revised method to the further variation; file creation and agreement do not establish improvement or philosophical correctness. | +| Self-exemption | A skill says its own conclusions need no grounds because it implements Organon. | Apply the relevant requirements to the output and the method; self-application is not self-proof. | +| Missing grilling | No usable external grilling capability is available and a decision-critical preference is unresolved. | Report the missing dependency and unfinished stage; do not invent answers or substitute a local interviewing protocol. | +| Missing reviewer | An absorption proposal is ready but no independent agent can review it. | Retain a provisional proposal and state cross-validation is incomplete; do not impersonate another agent or bypass the requirement. | +| Review disagreement | A reviewer finds an omitted condition in a proposal the author considered adequate. | Address the condition or retain a reasoned disagreement; agreement is not required at the cost of suppressing uncertainty. | +| No new grounds | A loop repeats its recommendation without new evidence, argument, counterexample, or justified revision. | Stop with the remaining limits; further rounds and more text are not progress by themselves. | +| Authority | A task authorizes editing examples, but a proposed edit would change a core commitment. | Respect the limited authorization and present the philosophical change for the user's decision. | +| Translation drift | A proposed translation turns “does not guarantee” into “forbids.” | Identify the change of force, align with the English authority, and do not use translation to revise philosophy. | +| Cross-system application | Apply Grounds to a research team and a software system under their stated objectives. | Preserve philosophical meaning; articulate the different premises, methods, counterexamples, and bounded conclusions. | +| Alternative implementation | Compare `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` with a human-led review practice. | Explain which philosophical constraints both can address, their relevant differences, and why the repository's chosen process is not a universal deduction. | +| Grilling integration | Read the real external grilling instructions and continue three independent situations: A, the last material choice is answered, same-scope authorization is already explicit, and required review and other prerequisites are complete; B, a material choice is still unanswered but independent preparation can continue; C, choices are resolved but a proposed publication exceeds the authorization to edit locally. | A: continue the authorized work without an additional final confirmation. B: retain the unanswered choice and defer dependent work; silence or stopping supplies no decision. C: complete reviewable preparation, identify the uncovered action, target, and scope, and request authorization before publication. Existing authorization does not bypass required cross-validation or cover additional actions. | +| Wording boundary | Review a repository text with `organon-core-wording-review`; a separate task asks only for an input assessment. | The wording skill reports supported language issues only; `organon-core-assess` retains its judgment checks without invoking it. Wording review does not assess authorization, grounds, validation, philosophy, or bilingual correspondence. | +| Wording quality | Review a paragraph containing a grammatical error, an ambiguous referent, unnecessary repetition, and a necessary qualification; also include a precise sentence that merely permits a different style. | Report the supported wording defects and smallest corrections, preserve the qualification, and leave the precise stylistic variant unchanged. | +| Maintenance evidence | A candidate omits part of the original request and claims validation passed, but provides only the planned command. | Identify the omitted requirement and missing execution evidence; distinguish proposed, executed, and verified work. Preserve existing user changes and the requested approval boundary. | +| Translation correspondence | Apply the rules in `zh/AGENTS.md` to corresponding text with a changed obligation or omitted condition, then consider a natural rephrasing with the same meaning and a permitted single-language reply. | Identify changes in meaning, force, and scope; retain necessary qualifications. Do not demand identical phrasing or bilingual output for every reply, and allow a natural rephrasing when no meaning change occurs. | + +## Principled-review cases + +The [principled-review skill](../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) is the single source for dimension definitions and full-analysis triggers. The cases below test its judgments and routing; they do not introduce separate definitions or core obligations. Record independent responses to raw requests before disclosing this table's expected boundaries. + +| Case | Raw request or condition | Expected boundary | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Orientation and stability | Compare A, which permits revision but explicitly does not value expanding understanding or constructive possibilities, with B, which maintains that orientation and non-finality while retaining its methods for supported reasons. | Distinguish permission from orientation; do not disqualify B for justified stability or infer actual expansion from orientation. | +| External learning | A team maintains its generative orientation and non-finality, expands understanding using collaborators' findings, and has not changed its own principles. | External assistance and unchanged principles do not themselves violate Self-Transcendence; assess any achievement within its supported scope. | +| Necessary limits | A rule allowing writes under target-specific authorization is shortened to an unconditional permission. Another longer version retains clauses with distinct necessary roles. | Deleting a material application limit is not removal of redundancy. Length alone does not establish excess; examine what each clause preserves. | +| Coverage boundary | All listed normal cases pass, but the stated objective includes an acknowledged exceptional case that has not been examined. The author claims domain completeness. | Identify the missing case or support gap; do not certify domain completeness from the examined subset. | +| Missing external facts | An adapter claims compliance with an unavailable interface definition, while its own rules require both preserving and deleting the same timestamps under identical conditions. | External compliance remains unknown; the internal contradiction can still be assessed. Missing external evidence is not non-applicability or automatic conflict. | +| Forms of criticism | Assess an empirical success claim insulated against any contrary observation, an inference supported only by compatibility, and an explicit value commitment with reasons and limits that accepts criticism but is not an empirical claim. | Examine empirical counterevidence, inferential support, and value criticism separately; do not demand a common empirical refutation or invent a forced value-revision condition. | +| Absent or incomparable alternatives | One proposal claims to be simplest without comparison evidence. Two other proposals have comparable relevant performance but trade fewer assumptions against fewer rules, with no stated preference between those dimensions. | Do not invent comparative superiority or a common complexity score. Preserve the unresolved comparison while continuing other grounded checks. | +| Conditional parsimony | Two candidates have comparable relevant support, explanation, coverage and constraints; one adds a hypothesis with no role and no compensating effect. | A bounded adoption preference for the simpler candidate is warranted under this method; greater truth does not follow merely from simplicity. | +| Criterion revision | An evaluator drops a failed requirement in a new criterion and claims the original judgment passed unchanged. | Critique criteria without silently adopting them. Preserve the old criterion and result; a new version needs a distinct judgment. | +| Self-review and routing | A report claims the method is complete and improves reasoning solely from two agents' agreement, and requires a new full review after each review. Separately, a grammar-only request is routed through full six-dimension analysis. | Agreement does not establish improvement or completeness; self-check remains bounded. Correct the overbroad routing and keep the separate wording task within its requested scope. | + +For a substantive principled-review revision, exercise the relevant cases with a different agent using the candidate skill and raw artifacts. Include a real application of the revised method to a relevant variation, and distinguish constructed-case reasoning from empirical performance evidence. Reuse recorded findings; do not restart the independent review chain from a delegated review. + +For the initial build of `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`, run the philosophical cases, the cases relevant to those skills, and an actual method-revision exercise. Use an independent agent for cross-validation: first obtain its own assessment from raw inputs, then reveal the candidate and its grounds. Review output, method, and revision standard. Distinct agents may share assumptions or model limitations; neither independence nor agreement establishes correctness. + +Document checks cover preserved wording, links, skill metadata, archive hashes, and protected files. They establish textual integrity only. Behavioral results support only the tested situations; unresolved cases and missing dependencies remain visible in the completion report. + +## Responsibility and handoff cases + +These cases exercise the division of responsibility and conditional dependencies. Give independent test agents raw requests and necessary artifacts before disclosing these expected boundaries. Keep their actual responses for comparison; named scenarios below are not evidence that the skills have handled them. + +| Case | Raw request or condition | Expected boundary | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Assessment objects | Assess an external group claiming consistency proves its empirical assumptions, and Organon claiming its own assessments need no grounds. | Apply the relevant provisions to both, give corrections, and do not automatically start absorption. | +| Method preference and core judgment | Two designs have comparable relevant support, explanation, coverage, and constraint satisfaction; one has an idle assumption. Separately assess whether selecting that design violates Organon. | Principled review can favor avoiding the assumption; assess must establish an applicable core conflict rather than infer it from the method preference alone. | +| Other commitments | A team consistently values preservation over expansion and has not adopted Organon. Review it under its goals, then assess it against Organon at the user’s request. | Distinguish its own commitments from the external comparison basis; a difference from Organon is not automatically its internal contradiction. | +| Two absorption reasons | One input duplicates Grounds; another argues for withdrawing the restriction on status alone establishing implementation priority. | Existing coverage can justify no addition; a challenge needs separate judgments of current compatibility and the reasons for revision. Neither compatibility nor conflict alone decides adoption. | +| Evidence and changed criteria | Two agents approve a proposed method; an author removes a failed condition from proposed C2 and claims C1 always passed. | Agreement does not establish improvement. Preserve the old judgment and identify the proposed change, including during self-review. | +| Maintenance routing | Separately revise only a skill trigger, correct a grammatical error, and consider changing a core commitment with necessary translation and skill synchronization. | Shared maintenance owns the independent skill change; wording remains narrow; absorb owns the philosophical decision and necessary synchronization. | +| Adoption authority | An exact core change has approval and completed independent review; another change exceeds example-only authorization; a third proposal has no independent reviewer. | Continue the first without repeated approval; leave the second dependent on a covered user decision; retain the third as provisional. | +| Conditional grilling | No external grilling is available: an ordinary assessment is fully specified, another task has an unanswered value choice, and another explicitly requests grilling. | Complete the ordinary assessment; pause only the dependent choice or requested grilling stage in the others, continuing independent checks without inventing answers. | +| Reuse and independence | Several callers share one unsupported inference finding; a workflow counts it repeatedly, adopts its own candidate baseline, discloses author conclusions before independent initial review, and recursively reviews each self-review. | Consolidate the finding with its grounds, preserve the adopted baseline and independent initial judgment, and perform a bounded self-check. Reuse is not permission to contaminate independent review. | + +For a responsibility revision, test the affected entrypoints and a relevant variation through actual responses. Static review can assess the proposed division of responsibility; it does not replace exercising the revised skills. Compare the current worktree to the iteration baseline to verify that unrelated changes and the philosophical core remain preserved when outside the authorized scope. diff --git a/zh/AGENTS.md b/zh/AGENTS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..48e9134 --- /dev/null +++ b/zh/AGENTS.md @@ -0,0 +1,9 @@ +# 中文翻译规则 + +本文件仅约束 `zh/` 下的中文翻译文件。英文哲学正本及英文配套文档是翻译基准：[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)与[英文论证](../docs/rationale.md)分别规定相应文本的含义、条件与限度；出现差异时，以英文文本为准。 + +中文翻译须与英文文本保持相同的含义、义务或确定性强度、条件、范围及必要限定，同时允许自然的中文措辞差异。术语、指代和适用范围须保持一致；表达应语法正确、精确、简洁且无歧义。不得因追求简短而删除必要条件，也不得加入英文没有支持的义务或确定性。 + +处理 `zh/` 下的翻译时，建议在 subagent 可用且任务适合独立处理时，将翻译交给使用独立任务上下文的 subagent，以减少翻译过程占用主任务上下文。为其提供必要的对应英文基准、现有译文、本文件规则，以及相关术语和变更范围；由其返回修改摘要与未决问题，主代理负责核对译文及同步结果。小范围修改或 subagent 不可用时，可由主代理直接处理。翻译委派不替代独立审查。 + +对应的英文和中文文件应同步更新。翻译规则不扩展为一般哲学义务，也不取代根目录的维护流程、独立审查、用户决定或验证要求。 diff --git a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4088526 --- /dev/null +++ b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -0,0 +1,126 @@ +# Organon 哲学：总纲与根据 + +本文是 Organon 当前哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 + +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 + +## 1. 总纲 + +### 1.1 总述 + +**自超越 · 自洽 · 反身** + +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，将自身及其原则纳入生成与检验，并以自洽约束这一过程。 + +总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入适用范围。各项的精确条件由下列分述明确。 + +### 1.2 自超越 + +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，不将任何既有构成视为生成的终点。 + +#### 1.2.1 生成取向 + +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。将这种拓展视为值得追求，构成内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 + +#### 1.2.2 非终局性 + +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得突破。 + +#### 1.2.3 成效根据与边界 + +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。生成也不能仅由产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加来认定。 + +- “内在取向”表达 Organon 的哲学承诺，不声称所有体系事实上都会自主发展。 +- 自超越不意味着体系无需外部经验、知识或协作，也不保证能够自主执行或自行改善。 +- 不将既有构成视为终点，不要求每次行动都产生改变。有根据的稳定与保留生成取向可以相容。 +- 超越是否拓展了可理解、可构成的可能，须有可辨识的根据；对生成的自我宣称不足以证明实际成效。 + +### 1.3 自洽 + +> 在相同前提、概念含义与适用范围内，体系同时持有的原则和判断及其推论，不得对同一问题给出相互矛盾的判断。 + +#### 1.3.1 含义 + +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了改变，就不能将其表述为从未改变。 + +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的差异不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 + +#### 1.3.2 适用边界 + +- 不同评价或价值之间存在张力，并不直接构成矛盾；当它们在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论时，需要修正或限定。 +- 自洽允许原则修订，不要求体系永远维持原来的观点。 +- 自洽不等于正确或充分。一套原则可以内部一致，却依赖错误前提，或者遗漏重要问题。 + +### 1.4 反身 + +> 体系的生成与检验原则，同样约束体系自身，以及这些原则的形成、适用与修订。 + +#### 1.4.1 含义 + +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和改变因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 + +#### 1.4.2 适用边界 + +- “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 +- 自我适用不构成自我证明。原则接受自身的检验，不等于原则因此正确。 +- 一个修订由体系自身产生，不等于它因此具有充分根据。 + +## 2. 根据 + +> 原则与判断的根据应可说明，并接受与主张性质相称的检验。主张的强度与适用范围，应与其根据所能提供的支持相称。 + +### 2.1 说明与检验责任 + +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；可检验性要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 + +| 主张类型 | 检验责任 | 不能替代该责任的做法 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | +| 推论 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +| 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | + +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。“主张强度”不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 + +### 2.2 关系、范围与度量的限度 + +表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 + +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 + +未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性，不以“能否原样重演”一次性决定全部根据的地位。 + +### 2.3 能力主张 + +能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 + +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 + +### 2.4 实现选择：对替代实现的开放 + +> 实现方式的取舍，应有与所追求目标、价值及相关约束相联系的理由。名称、惯例或既有地位本身，不构成优先采用某种实现的充分根据。 + +本选择条款保留一项额外的评价承诺：身份或地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 + +#### 适用边界 + +- 开放不意味着所有实现等价，也不保证同一目标必然存在多种可行实现。 +- 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及内部方法就排除它们。 +- 局部表现相同不足以证明整体等价。关系、条件和比较范围由“根据”条目约束。 +- 开放不是仅因一种实现已经存在或被惯常采用就否定它；该实现仍可凭相关理由获得优先。 + +## 3. 关系与必要术语 + +### 3.1 分工与相互约束 + +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 + +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张为何获得支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些前提下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 + +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至这些对象。根据自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 + +### 3.2 必要术语 + +| 中文 | 英文 | 本文中的含义 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| 既有构成 | existing form | 体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。 | +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | diff --git a/zh/rationale.md b/zh/rationale.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d9c25ad --- /dev/null +++ b/zh/rationale.md @@ -0,0 +1,142 @@ +# Organon 论证 + +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 + +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 + +## 1. 归位与规范地位的变化 + +| 原有内容 | 当前归位 | 变化及限度 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | + +## 2. 采纳理由及其限度 + +### 2.1 承诺与反对意见 + +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 + +| 承诺 | 采纳理由及前提 | 反对意见与限度 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | + +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 + +### 2.2 应用中的能力标准 + +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 + +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 + +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 + +### 2.3 检验工具 + +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 + +### 2.4 分析方法的根据 + +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 + +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 + +## 3. 删除检验 + +| 暂去一项 | 被删去的明确要求及其与其他条目的区别 | +| --- | --- | +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | + +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 + +## 4. 情境辨析 + +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 + +| 情境 | 判断与边界 | +| --- | --- | +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | + +## 5. 对本次重构的自我适用 + +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 + +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 + +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 + +## 6. 跨体系约束 + +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 + +### 6.1 研究团队 + +| 论证环节 | 应用 | +| --- | --- | +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | + +### 6.2 软件系统 + +| 论证环节 | 应用 | +| --- | --- | +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | + +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 + +## 7. 本仓库形式的根据与限度 + +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 + +| 已选择的实现 | 情境理由 | 限度及可能替代 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | + +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 + +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 From a203450fcb71e47d62844aed4984cac868400612 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YANG Jingyu Date: Wed, 9 Sep 2026 04:01:40 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/9] feat: support selected philosophies and stable document units --- AGENTS.md | 2 + PHILOSOPHY.md | 28 ++++++++++ README.md | 3 ++ skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md | 10 ++-- skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md | 12 ++--- .../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md | 10 ++-- skills/references/iteration.md | 8 +-- skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md | 17 ++++++ skills/references/structure.md | 54 +++++++++++++++++++ skills/references/validation.md | 17 ++++++ zh/PHILOSOPHY.md | 28 ++++++++++ 11 files changed, 169 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-) create mode 100644 skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md create mode 100644 skills/references/structure.md diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index 228cd08..133ae45 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@ Read [PHILOSOPHY.md](PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, before assessing or changing this repository. It is the English authority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) explains the philosophy without adding core obligations. Skills implement context-specific methods and may be revised. +For skills applied outside this repository, use [philosophy resolution](skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md) to retain the caller's selected adopted baseline; Core remains the baseline for maintaining this repository. The [document format](skills/references/structure.md) specifies version metadata and stable text-unit IDs as revisable interfaces, not additional philosophical commitments. + For an input assessment, use [organon-core-assess](skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md). For philosophical absorption and its necessary synchronization, use [organon-core-absorb](skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md). Read their shared [iteration rules](skills/references/iteration.md) for external grilling, independent-first cross-validation, authorization, records, and stopping. Delegated reviewers return findings instead of recursively requesting review. Use [organon-core-principled-review](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) for full analysis when its stated trigger conditions apply. It owns the six-dimension method, including bounded review of its own output and criteria. Reuse findings with their standards and grounds; assess owns current philosophical compatibility judgments, while absorb owns philosophical adoption. Method findings do not automatically establish core conflicts, and principled review does not replace independent cross-validation. Routine narrow assessment and wording-only work retain their separate scope. diff --git a/PHILOSOPHY.md b/PHILOSOPHY.md index 230c01f..a4625ef 100644 --- a/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,12 +1,21 @@ +--- +format_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.0 +core_version: 0.1.0 +derived_from: null +--- # Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds + This is the current authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. ## 1. Charter + ### 1.1 Overview + **Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** @@ -15,18 +24,22 @@ The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of application. The provisions below specify the precise conditions for each. ### 1.2 Self-Transcendence + > A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. #### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation + A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. Regarding that expansion as worth pursuing constitutes an intrinsic orientation. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. #### 1.2.2 Non-finality + Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual breakthroughs. #### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits + Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Generation cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. @@ -36,40 +49,48 @@ Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the o - Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. ### 1.3 Internal Consistency + > The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. #### 1.3.1 Meaning + “Held simultaneously” identifies the principles, judgments, and implications that need to hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, it cannot be represented as though nothing changed. “The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Differences under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. #### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits + - Tension between different evaluations or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. - Internal consistency permits revision of principles; it does not require a system to maintain its original views forever. - Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or omitting important questions. ### 1.4 Reflexivity + > A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. #### 1.4.1 Meaning + Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and alteration of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. #### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits + - Equal application retains the conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. - Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. - A revision’s being produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. ## 2. Grounds + > The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. ### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment + Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessability requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. @@ -82,6 +103,7 @@ Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requi Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. “Strength of a claim” does not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. ### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement + Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. @@ -90,18 +112,21 @@ Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help e An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. Whether an event can be replayed identically does not determine the standing of all grounds at once. ### 2.3 Capability Claims + Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. ### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives + > The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. This choice provision retains an additional evaluative commitment: identity or status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. #### Conditions and Limits + - Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. - A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for evaluation. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern internal methods. @@ -109,8 +134,10 @@ This choice provision retains an additional evaluative commitment: identity or s - Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. ## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms + ### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints + The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. @@ -119,6 +146,7 @@ Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold tog Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends those requirements to these objects. The grounds and limits of Grounds must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. ### 3.2 Necessary Terms + | Term | Meaning in this philosophy | | --- | --- | diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 880125d..84725f5 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Organon is a text-centered philosophical core: **Self-Transcendence, Internal Co - [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) explains contributions, dependencies, counterexamples, and applications. It cannot independently add obligations to the core. - Chinese translations are maintained under `zh/` for readability and follow the English authority. - [Agent guidance](AGENTS.md) identifies how to work on this repository. The skills below are revisable applications under this repository's goals, not additional philosophical truths. +- [Philosophy resolution](skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md) selects the adopted baseline; the [document format](skills/references/structure.md) defines version metadata, stable text-unit IDs, and a revisable starting template. ## Use the skills @@ -20,6 +21,8 @@ Organon is a text-centered philosophical core: **Self-Transcendence, Internal Co Give an agent the relevant entrypoint and your input, for example: “Use `organon-core-assess` to assess this design under its stated assumptions,” or “Use `organon-core-absorb` to consider whether this counterexample warrants a change.” These skills use English instructions and respond in the user's language. They can be invoked separately but reference this repository's guidance; copying a skill folder alone does not make a standalone distribution. Load the entrypoint explicitly if the host does not discover this directory; no automatic installation or discovery is assumed. +For a downstream assessment or absorption, supply the adopted philosophy's path. Assess, absorb, and principled review retain that selection through their shared references and distinguish it from Core's method constraints. Direct Core invocations without a caller selection use the bundled English philosophy. A missing selected file stops the dependent operation without fallback. Wording review remains independent of philosophical lookup. Core's own maintenance continues to use its English authority. + Use the real external `grilling` capability, directly or through `grill-me`, when explicitly requested or when material unresolved choices require it. Gather facts before questioning; a fully specified ordinary assessment needs neither dependency lookup nor an interview. When the required capability is unavailable, state which stage is incomplete and continue independent work. Cross-validation requires a different agent’s initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal; missing that capability leaves a provisional result, not completed cross-validation. [Principled review](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) defines the full-analysis triggers and six dimensions in one place. It distinguishes the object’s own commitments, the selected review standards, and the method’s constraints. Assess uses findings to judge current philosophical compatibility; absorb separately judges reasons for adoption. Method preferences do not automatically establish core conflicts. Both reuse findings when the triggers apply; ordinary narrow assessment keeps targeted checks, and wording-only work does not launch a full cycle. Principled review returns findings without invoking assess or absorb, editing the object, or adopting a revision. Its bounded self-check does not replace independent cross-validation required by absorption. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md b/skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md index ba16a68..7ae6cbc 100644 --- a/skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md @@ -1,15 +1,15 @@ --- name: organon-core-absorb -description: Decide whether input warrants revising Organon’s philosophy; develop a concrete proposal, address feedback, obtain independent review and the required user decision, then implement authorized adoption and necessary synchronization. Independent skill optimization and general documentation maintenance use the shared maintenance workflow. +description: Decide whether input warrants revising the selected adopted philosophy; develop a concrete proposal, address feedback, obtain independent review and the required user decision, then implement authorized adoption and necessary synchronization. Independent skill optimization and general documentation maintenance use the shared maintenance workflow. --- # Organon Core Absorb -Read the [English philosophical authority](../../PHILOSOPHY.md) and the [shared iteration, maintenance, dependency, and authority rules](../references/iteration.md). Communicate in the user's language. This skill coordinates philosophical absorption; absorption is not a universal obligation inferred from self-transcendence. +Read the adopted philosophy using [philosophy resolution](../references/philosophy-resolution.md) and the [shared iteration, maintenance, dependency, and authority rules](../references/iteration.md). Communicate in the user's language. This skill coordinates philosophical absorption; absorption is not a universal obligation inferred from self-transcendence. ## Establish the question and current relationship -Identify the input, current philosophical baseline, alleged gap, and intended contribution. Read the relevant existing material before assuming a gap. Establish the input’s grounds, conditions, and support limits. Use external grilling when explicitly requested or needed for material unknowns and trade-offs, after gathering discoverable facts. +Identify the input, selected current philosophical baseline, alleged gap, intended contribution, and exact adoption target. Read the relevant existing material before assuming a gap. Establish the input's grounds, conditions, and support limits. Pass the selected baseline to assessment and independent reviewers; shared Core references do not change the target to Core. Use external grilling when explicitly requested or needed for material unknowns and trade-offs, after gathering discoverable facts. Arrange independent review under the shared protocol: the reviewer receives the raw input, baseline, objectives, and necessary context before the author’s candidate or conclusions. It records its initial judgment before those are disclosed. The author can develop the proposal independently while that review proceeds. @@ -19,11 +19,11 @@ Use [organon-core-assess](../organon-core-assess/SKILL.md) to establish existing Compare retaining the current form with meaningful alternatives: adding, clarifying, revising, merging, or withdrawing philosophical content. Explain what understanding or constructive capability would be gained, or what unsupported or conflicting content would be corrected. Novelty, volume, or a useful but already covered example need not warrant a change. Give reasons for no absorption or deferral when appropriate; a covered input with no full-review trigger can end with that bounded conclusion. -Specify concrete provisions, their meanings and application limits, the grounds for changing them, additional premises, alternatives, and consequences. Identify which existing commitments would remain or be withdrawn. A hypothetical revised whole is a candidate, not the adopted baseline; old and new commitments need not remain simultaneously held after an explicit withdrawal. +Specify concrete provisions, their meanings and application limits, the grounds for changing them, additional premises, alternatives, and consequences. Identify which existing commitments would remain or be withdrawn. A hypothetical revised whole is a candidate, not the adopted baseline; old and new commitments need not remain simultaneously held after an explicit withdrawal. A downstream adopter may revise or withdraw a Core commitment; distinguish the selected philosophy's judgments from the Core method's constraints, and report any method limitation separately rather than silently vetoing the candidate because it differs from Core. Use [organon-core-principled-review](../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) when its full-review triggers apply. Review the substantive candidate, the reasons for adoption, the relationships within the proposed whole, and this absorption method and its criteria. Reuse findings with their standards and support limits; supplement them for material changes instead of duplicating unchanged checks. A method preference is not automatically a core obligation, and completing the review does not establish that adoption is warranted. -Distinguish philosophical change from necessary synchronization. A change to a commitment, meaning, or applicability belongs to the core and requires the user’s explicit decision. Update rationale, translations, or skills where that adopted change requires it; reasons and examples do not independently add core obligations. An explanatory edit that changes a required judgment is a possible philosophical change. Independent skill optimization or general documentation work belongs to shared maintenance, even if the absorption discussion revealed it; do not treat discovering useful work as authorization to perform it. +Distinguish philosophical change from necessary synchronization. A change to a commitment, meaning, or applicability belongs to the selected philosophy and requires the user's explicit decision. Update that adoption target's rationale, translations, or skills where the adopted change requires it; reasons and examples do not independently add philosophical obligations. A downstream adoption does not authorize changes or publication to Core. An explanatory edit that changes a required judgment is a possible philosophical change. Independent skill optimization or general documentation work belongs to shared maintenance, even if the absorption discussion revealed it; do not treat discovering useful work as authorization to perform it. ## Resolve feedback, decide, and implement diff --git a/skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md b/skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md index f142980..e1ae6c0 100644 --- a/skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md @@ -1,27 +1,27 @@ --- name: organon-core-assess -description: Assess a given claim, design, method, or artifact against the current Organon philosophy, explaining applicability, grounds, conflicts, and minimal correction directions. Use for philosophical assessment, including assessment of Organon itself; philosophical absorption is a separate decision. +description: Assess a given claim, design, method, or artifact against the selected adopted philosophy, explaining applicability, grounds, conflicts, and minimal correction directions. Use for philosophical assessment, including assessment of Organon itself; philosophical absorption is a separate decision. --- # Organon Core Assess -Read the [English philosophical authority](../../PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, and the [shared iteration and dependency rules](../references/iteration.md). Write in the user's language. This skill is a revisable application of the philosophy, not a further philosophical principle. +Read the adopted philosophy using [philosophy resolution](../references/philosophy-resolution.md), including its meanings and limits, and the [shared iteration and dependency rules](../references/iteration.md). Write in the user's language. This skill is a revisable Core method, not a further philosophical principle of the selected text. ## Assess the input -Identify the actual object and requested judgment. Fix the philosophical baseline and distinguish the input's claims, assumptions, objectives, and scope. Treat Organon as the adopted basis for this assessment, not as a universally proven truth or evidence that the input’s author has adopted it. Distinguish conflict with this external assessment basis from contradiction within the input’s own commitments. An input that challenges it can expose a question for revision without changing the current baseline. +Identify the actual object and requested judgment. Fix the selected philosophical baseline and distinguish the input's claims, assumptions, objectives, and scope. Treat the selected text as the adopted basis for this assessment, not as a universally proven truth or evidence that the input's author has adopted it. Distinguish conflict with this external assessment basis from contradiction within the input's own commitments. An input that challenges it can expose a question for revision without changing the current baseline. Pass that same baseline to any delegated skill; do not replace it with bundled Core text. Determine which provisions apply and why. Distinguish empirical claims, inferences, and value commitments. Trace material judgments to the relevant provision and additional premises; make the support and its limits articulable. A report or artifact need not individually exhibit every commitment of a system. Mark a materially relevant unknown as unknown, not as compliance, conflict, or inapplicability. -Examine whether judgments under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope can hold together; whether their grounds support their strength and scope; and, where relevant, whether implementation choices meet the choice provision under Grounds. For capability claims, identify the capability actually claimed, its application-specific definition, and the evidence supporting it. Do not impose a uniform mastery or generation standard. Distinguish external grounds for a capability claim from the assessed system’s ability to explain its own process; require the latter when the application calls for it. Keep orientation distinct from achievement, reliable output from understanding its production, local agreement from overall equivalence, and self-application from self-proof. +Examine whether judgments under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope can hold together; whether their grounds support their strength and scope; and, where relevant, whether implementation choices meet the choice provision under Grounds. For capability claims, identify the capability actually claimed, its application-specific definition, and the evidence supporting it. Do not impose a uniform mastery or generation standard. Distinguish external grounds for a capability claim from the assessed system's ability to explain its own process; require the latter when the application calls for it. Keep orientation distinct from achievement, reliable output from understanding its production, local agreement from overall equivalence, and self-application from self-proof. These are Core method checks; when the selected philosophy differs, identify which checks follow from that baseline and which remain additional method standards. A method standard alone does not establish conflict with the selected philosophy. -Use [organon-core-principled-review](../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) when its full-analysis trigger conditions apply. Reuse its findings in the judgment below; do not duplicate its definitions or rerun unchanged checks. This skill owns the current philosophical compatibility judgment: connect each claimed core conflict to an applicable provision and its grounds. Keep additional method findings or preferences distinct; they do not automatically constitute philosophical violations. Routine narrow assessment keeps the targeted checks above. +Use [organon-core-principled-review](../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) when its full-analysis trigger conditions apply. Reuse its findings in the judgment below; do not duplicate its definitions or rerun unchanged checks. This skill owns the current philosophical compatibility judgment: connect each claimed baseline conflict to an applicable provision of the selected philosophy and its grounds. Keep additional method findings or preferences distinct; they do not automatically constitute philosophical violations. Routine narrow assessment keeps the targeted checks above. Obtain discoverable facts before invoking external grilling when explicitly requested or needed for decision-critical unknowns. Follow its questions through the relevant decisions; do not add a ritual interview when the supplied grounds suffice. Missing dependencies and unanswered material choices remain explicit under the shared rules. ## Return a bounded judgment -Explain what is compatible, in conflict, insufficiently supported, or unresolved, with the conditions on each judgment. These can coexist within one input; do not collapse them into a universal pass/fail verdict or confidence score. Offer the smallest correction direction that addresses the diagnosed issue. Do not rewrite the input or modify Organon unless that work is authorized. +Explain what is compatible, in conflict, insufficiently supported, or unresolved, with the conditions on each judgment. These can coexist within one input; do not collapse them into a universal pass/fail verdict or confidence score. Offer the smallest correction direction that addresses the diagnosed issue. Do not rewrite the input or modify the selected philosophy or repository unless that work is authorized. Assess your own conclusion and method under the same relevant principles: look for omitted conditions, unsupported inferences, self-exemptions, and a counterexample that could change the judgment. Reporting no conflict does not establish correctness or sufficient support. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md b/skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md index 1de4f58..6bc8f51 100644 --- a/skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md +++ b/skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ --- name: organon-core-principled-review -description: Review claims, designs, methods, or systems using six review principles under stated goals, scope, and standards. Return grounded findings for structural, self-, or six-dimension analysis and substantive revisions; assess owns the current Organon compatibility judgment, and absorb owns philosophical adoption. +description: Review claims, designs, methods, or systems using six review principles under stated goals, scope, and standards. Return grounded findings for structural, self-, or six-dimension analysis and substantive revisions; assess owns compatibility judgments against the selected philosophy, and absorb owns philosophical adoption. --- # Organon Core Principled Review -Read the [English philosophical authority](../../PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, and the [shared iteration rules](../references/iteration.md). Respond in the user's language. This skill is a revisable analysis method, not six additional universal philosophical obligations or a uniform capability standard. +Read the adopted philosophy using [philosophy resolution](../references/philosophy-resolution.md), including its meanings and limits, and the [shared iteration rules](../references/iteration.md). Respond in the user's language. This skill is a revisable analysis method, not six additional universal philosophical obligations or a uniform capability standard. ## When to use @@ -15,13 +15,13 @@ Run the complete analysis when structural, self-, or six-dimension analysis is e ## Fix the object and grounds -Identify the object, claims, objectives, scope, and application requirements. Distinguish the object’s own commitments, the standards selected for this review, and the constraints on the review method itself. Organon constrains this method; its use does not mean that the object has adopted Organon. When comparing an object with Organon, identify that external basis rather than treating a difference as the object’s internal contradiction. Distinguish facts, inferences, values, and method choices. Keep each declared baseline fixed: a proposed standard is not already the standard used to assess it. +Identify the object, claims, objectives, scope, and application requirements. Distinguish the object's own commitments, the selected philosophical baseline and other review standards, and the constraints on the review method itself. Core constrains this method; its use does not mean that the object or a downstream adopter has adopted every Core commitment. When comparing an object with the selected philosophy, identify that external basis rather than treating a difference as the object's internal contradiction. Distinguish facts, inferences, values, and method choices. Keep each declared baseline fixed: a proposed standard is not already the standard used to assess it. Retain the caller's selected text when consulting shared references or returning findings; do not replace it with bundled Core. Report any method limitation separately from a conflict with the selected philosophy. Gather discoverable facts before questioning the user. Use the real external `grilling` capability when explicitly requested or when material unresolved choices require it, under the shared dependency rules. Continue checks independent of pending answers. Missing evidence, an unanswered choice, and non-applicability are different conditions. Do not invent a goal or preference to finish a comparison. ## Six dimensions -For a full invocation, address each dimension’s applicability, grounds, judgment, and limits. These are review principles, not six additional core commitments. Identify the applicable standard for each material finding; a difference from a method preference does not by itself establish a philosophical conflict. In particular, an object’s lack of generative orientation is not automatically a defect under its own goals. Use the following definitions as the shared method; callers should link here rather than maintain separate versions. +For a full invocation, address each dimension's applicability, grounds, judgment, and limits. These are review principles, not six additional commitments of the selected philosophy. Identify the applicable standard for each material finding; a difference from a method preference does not by itself establish a philosophical conflict. In particular, an object's lack of generative orientation is not automatically a defect under its own goals. Use the following definitions as the shared Core method; if a selected downstream philosophy has revised a named Core commitment, identify that difference rather than attributing the original commitment to the selected text. Callers should link here rather than maintain separate versions. | Dimension | Analysis responsibility | Limits | | --- | --- | --- | @@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Minimal completeness examines the object's coverage and redundant content; Occam ## Return findings and examine this analysis -State what is supported, in conflict, insufficiently supported, unresolved, or inapplicable, with reasons for the distinctions. State the standard supporting each material judgment, including applicable core provisions and additional premises where relevant. Return findings for the caller to use; assess must establish whether they warrant a current philosophical compatibility judgment, and absorb must separately establish a case for adoption. Consolidate each actual issue with its grounds, effect, and smallest correction direction; one issue may concern several dimensions without becoming several defects. Do not produce a composite score or infer quality from completing six headings. +State what is supported, in conflict, insufficiently supported, unresolved, or inapplicable, with reasons for the distinctions. State the standard supporting each material judgment, distinguishing selected philosophical provisions, Core method constraints, and additional premises where relevant. Return findings for the caller to use; assess must establish whether they warrant a current philosophical compatibility judgment, and absorb must separately establish a case for adoption. Consolidate each actual issue with its grounds, effect, and smallest correction direction; one issue may concern several dimensions without becoming several defects. Do not produce a composite score or infer quality from completing six headings. Apply the relevant dimensions to this report, the analysis method used, and its evaluation criteria within the same bounded review. Check for unsupported conclusions, omissions, hidden preferences, self-exemptions, and a counterexample that could change the judgment. Reuse those results rather than generating a separate full report recursively. diff --git a/skills/references/iteration.md b/skills/references/iteration.md index e1bd7f2..d840705 100644 --- a/skills/references/iteration.md +++ b/skills/references/iteration.md @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ # Iteration and cross-validation -Use this record for designing, implementing, assessing, or revising an Organon skill or repository text. It organizes inspectable grounds; filling it out is not proof. The [core](../../PHILOSOPHY.md) supplies philosophical commitments, while this method implements the repository's chosen objectives and constraints. Explaining method revisions and testing relevant variations serve this repository's reviewability objectives; they do not impose a uniform capability definition on every assessed system. The initiating agent reads [validation](validation.md) to select cases before a method change. Independent test agents must record their initial responses before seeing the expected boundaries. +Use this record for designing, implementing, assessing, or revising an Organon skill or repository text, and for a caller's selected philosophical adoption. It organizes inspectable grounds; filling it out is not proof. [Philosophy resolution](philosophy-resolution.md) fixes the adopted baseline for the current operation. The bundled [Core](../../PHILOSOPHY.md) supplies this method's philosophical constraints and remains the baseline for Core repository maintenance; that link does not override a downstream caller's selected text. This method implements the repository's chosen objectives and constraints. Explaining method revisions and testing relevant variations serve this repository's reviewability objectives; they do not impose a uniform capability definition on every assessed system. The initiating agent reads [validation](validation.md) to select cases before a method change. Independent test agents must record their initial responses before seeing the expected boundaries. ## Six-part record -1. **Object and baseline.** Identify the input, the adopted philosophy used, and relevant text versions or snapshots. Keep the baseline fixed within an assessment. Distinguish a proposed replacement from the baseline it challenges. +1. **Object and baseline.** Identify the input, the selected adopted philosophy and its path, the adoption target, and relevant text versions or snapshots. Keep the baseline fixed within an assessment and pass it to delegated skills and reviewers. Distinguish a proposed replacement from the baseline it challenges and the Core method's constraints from the selected philosophy's commitments. 2. **Problem and objective.** State the decision to resolve, relevant conditions, and what would count as a useful improvement. Stability or no absorption may be justified. 3. **Grounds and additional premises.** Cite applicable provisions; distinguish observations, inferences, value commitments, and application choices. State support limits and explain non-applicability when material. Do not force every provision onto every input. -4. **Candidates and trade-offs.** Compare the meaningful alternatives, including retaining the current form. Explain the destination and distinctive contribution of any absorption. Distinguish a minimal correction to an input from a change to Organon. +4. **Candidates and trade-offs.** Compare the meaningful alternatives, including retaining the current form. Explain the destination and distinctive contribution of any absorption. Distinguish a minimal correction to an input from a change to the selected philosophy or its repository. 5. **Assessment and counterexamples.** State expected boundaries before implementation, examine actual responses and relevant variations, and record self-assessment and independent review separately. Assess outputs, the method, and its revision criteria. Explain failures and the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. 6. **Decision and remaining questions.** State the conclusion, applicable authorization, changes made or still proposed, and remaining uncertainty. For another round, identify what new grounds or justified revision warrant continuing, and preserve the preceding judgment and material differences. @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ If an independent reviewer is unavailable, retain a provisional result and state Use the externally available `grilling` capability when explicitly requested or when material unresolved choices require user input, directly or through the `grill-me` entrypoint. Gather discoverable facts first. Resolve the capability by name and read its actual instructions, following the entrypoint to its target. Do not hard-code a machine path, silently install it, or replace it with an in-repository imitation. Without an explicit request or a material unresolved choice, no dependency lookup or interview is required. If a required capability is unavailable, report it and pause the requested grilling or dependent decision stage; continue independent checks and fact gathering. Missing grilling does not supply answers or prevent a fully specified ordinary assessment. -Within these skills, apply grilling's design tree to unresolved choices that materially affect the current task. Do not ask users to supply discoverable facts, reopen settled choices, or require a separate final confirmation merely because grilling was invoked. Once those choices are resolved, continue only within existing authorization and after other prerequisites, including required cross-validation, are satisfied. An unanswered material choice remains unresolved; stopping an iteration does not supply an answer or authorization. +Within these skills, apply grilling's design tree to unresolved choices that materially affect the current task. Do not ask users to supply discoverable facts, reopen settled choices, or require a separate final confirmation merely because grilling was invoked. Once those choices are resolved, continue only within existing authorization and after other prerequisites, including required cross-validation, are satisfied. An unanswered material choice remains unresolved; stopping an iteration does not supply an answer or authorization. File-change classifications and format checks do not replace the reasons for philosophical adoption, independent review, or the user's decision on the concrete candidate. Default to a concrete proposal. Existing explicit authorization permits changes within its scope; do not require repeated approval for the same authorized work. Changes to philosophical meaning need the user's explicit decision, including changes hidden in definitions, translations, or examples. A candidate does not become the baseline merely because an agent generated or approved it. If English and Chinese disagree, follow the English authority; do not silently reinterpret the English text to reconcile them. diff --git a/skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md b/skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..26826f8 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# Selecting a philosophical baseline + +The caller may supply the path of the adopted philosophy for an assessment or absorption task. Resolve a relative supplied path against the caller's working directory, then retain the selected path and text version throughout the operation. Read the whole text, including meanings and application limits. Pass the same selection to delegated skills and independent reviewers; a shared reference does not select another baseline. + +For a readable symbolic link, retain the selected path while resolving the text's relative references from the real target's directory. Reading a link does not authorize writing through it or replacing it; a read-only mirror remains read-only for philosophy management. + +For a direct Core skill invocation without a caller-selected philosophy, use `../../PHILOSOPHY.md` relative to that skill's `SKILL.md` directory. Work on the Core repository itself retains its English `PHILOSOPHY.md` as the maintenance baseline. + +A caller requesting workspace resolution, such as AgentOrganon, checks `PHILOSOPHY.md` at the Git repository root first and then in the current working directory. Outside a Git repository, check only the working directory. Do not recursively search ancestors or descendants. The caller passes the selected path to Core instead of invoking Core's default lookup. + +If a supplied or selected path is missing or unreadable, stop the dependent philosophical operation and report the path. If workspace lookup finds no candidate, stop and report that a workspace philosophy must be initialized or explicitly selected. Do not substitute the bundled Core philosophy after a workspace or explicit selection fails. A caller may provide its own initialization instructions. + +Keep three objects distinct: the selected adopted philosophy, the candidate that may replace it, and the Core method's own constraints. The selected philosophy supplies the baseline for compatibility judgments; the Core instructions govern use of this review method. A method constraint does not silently become a commitment of the selected philosophy. If the method cannot perform a requested operation under its constraints, report that limitation separately instead of changing the selected baseline or treating the limitation as a philosophical conflict. + +Downstream users may explicitly revise or withdraw Core commitments. Assess the current selected baseline and the reasons for a proposed revision separately; neither difference from Core nor compatibility with the selected text alone decides adoption. Retain the shared requirements for independent review and the user's decision on changes to philosophical meaning. A candidate becomes the adopted baseline only after authorized adoption, with the preceding judgment preserved. + +The wording-review skill does not select or require a philosophy. It reviews wording within its stated scope. diff --git a/skills/references/structure.md b/skills/references/structure.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d9d1b85 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/references/structure.md @@ -0,0 +1,54 @@ +# Philosophy document format + +This is a revisable document interface for tools and callers. It adds no philosophical commitments and does not make a format check an assessment of meaning, support, or adoption. Core remains text-only; external tools may implement these conventions. + +## Version header + +A managed philosophy starts with this frontmatter, followed by the original Markdown text: + +```yaml +--- +format_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.0 +core_version: 0.1.0 +derived_from: null +--- +``` + +The supported header is a deliberately limited scalar format, not general YAML. Its only top-level fields are the four shown above, each appearing exactly once. Version values are unquoted `X.Y.Z` decimal triples, without leading zeroes except for zero itself, prerelease labels, or build metadata. `derived_from` is either literal `null` or an object with exactly these three fields, indented by two spaces, whose values are JSON double-quoted string scalars: + +```yaml +derived_from: + source_id: "example-source" + philosophy_version: "0.1.0" + content_hash: "0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000" +``` + +The hash shown is a placeholder; an export records the actual source document's SHA-256 digest as 64 lowercase hexadecimal characters. The source identity and version identify the text from which the export was derived. This metadata is provenance, not proof of a shared merge ancestor, official Core content, or full adoption. Other YAML features, unknown or duplicate fields, and other scalar forms are outside this format. + +`format_version` identifies this mechanical interface. `philosophy_version` identifies the adopted philosophical text. `core_version` identifies the Core version last fully considered by the adopter; it does not assert that every provision or update was accepted. Foreign imports do not advance that Core checkpoint merely by being imported. A revision to an existing commitment's meaning, force, or applicability warrants a major-version proposal; an addition that leaves existing commitments unchanged warrants a minor-version proposal; wording or structural changes without semantic change warrant a patch-version proposal. The agent explains the proposed classification and the user decides it; scripts do not infer philosophical meaning. + +## Text units and stable IDs + +Managed headings use the unindented ATX form `# Title` through `###### Title`, outside fenced code. Other ATX spellings and Setext headings are unsupported. Each managed heading has one ID comment on the immediately following line: + +```markdown +### A section + + +Its direct body. +``` + +The document begins with one H1 heading whose ID is `organon.preamble`; its body contains the introductory text. Every heading, including headings with children or an empty direct body, has an ID. A unit contains its heading, ID line, and direct body up to the next ATX heading of any level or the end of the document. No authoritative text is left outside the units. Setext headings are outside the managed heading format. + +IDs are unique within a document and match `[a-z][a-z0-9-]*(\.[a-z][a-z0-9-]*)+`. The single ID `extensions` is the only exception. Core's initial units use the `organon.*` namespace; adopters preserve an existing ID when editing, renaming, or moving that unit and use their own namespace for new units. An ID records identity, not philosophical priority or an immutable commitment. English and Chinese Core mirrors have the same IDs in the same order. + +For a body hash, exclude the heading and ID line, convert CRLF and CR line endings to LF, and hash the complete direct body, including trailing blank lines. Do not trim or collapse whitespace. Compare heading text, level, parent ID, and order separately as structure; a move alone is not a body conflict. Change classification records text relationships, not philosophical compatibility. Review the proposed whole because independently classified units may constrain one another. + +## Template and extensions + +The current Core text provides three starting chapters: Charter, Grounds, and Relationships and Necessary Terms. They are a template, not an undeletable skeleton. Adopters may regroup the text and explicitly revise or withdraw commitments through their adoption process; a format checker must not reject a document solely because a template chapter was moved, renamed, or removed. + +An external initializer may add an empty `## 4. Extensions` heading with ID `extensions`. Core does not add that empty chapter to its own philosophy. The marked heading and all of its descendants form the extension subtree, irrespective of its displayed title or position. An export that excludes extensions removes that marked subtree. If the marker is absent, ask the user to identify the intended boundary before such an export; do not guess from chapter numbers or wording. The remaining text is still the adopter's text, which may differ from official Core. + +A source checkpoint or lock is separate from this document format. A derived workspace may keep one for change classification; the Core text and a read-only mirror can be format-valid without one. A local body differing from its recorded source hash is an ordinary customization, not by itself a format error. Hashes cannot recover unavailable prior text or establish a common ancestor; report those limits when comparing changes. diff --git a/skills/references/validation.md b/skills/references/validation.md index c94aca4..222e053 100644 --- a/skills/references/validation.md +++ b/skills/references/validation.md @@ -78,3 +78,20 @@ These cases exercise the division of responsibility and conditional dependencies | Reuse and independence | Several callers share one unsupported inference finding; a workflow counts it repeatedly, adopts its own candidate baseline, discloses author conclusions before independent initial review, and recursively reviews each self-review. | Consolidate the finding with its grounds, preserve the adopted baseline and independent initial judgment, and perform a bounded self-check. Reuse is not permission to contaminate independent review. | For a responsibility revision, test the affected entrypoints and a relevant variation through actual responses. Static review can assess the proposed division of responsibility; it does not replace exercising the revised skills. Compare the current worktree to the iteration baseline to verify that unrelated changes and the philosophical core remain preserved when outside the authorized scope. + +## Selected philosophy and document structure cases + +These cases test the selected-baseline interface and its maintenance boundaries. Give independent agents the raw request and necessary texts before disclosing expected boundaries; preserve their initial responses. The format checks below establish textual integrity, not philosophical correctness or adoption. + +| Case | Raw request or condition | Expected boundary | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Explicit philosophy | Assess an input using a caller-specified adopted philosophy that differs from the bundled Core text. | Keep the selected text as the assessment baseline through delegated skills and shared references; distinguish the Core method's constraints from commitments of that baseline. | +| Missing selected text | The caller specifies a nonexistent philosophy file while the bundled Core text exists. | Stop the dependent philosophical operation, identify the missing path, and do not fall back to Core. | +| Workspace lookup | From a repository subdirectory, resolve a workspace philosophy with both repository-root and cwd candidates present; repeat after removing the root candidate, then both candidates. | Select root first, then cwd, without recursively searching directories; if neither exists, stop without substituting Core. | +| Revised commitments | A selected downstream philosophy explicitly withdraws one Core commitment. Review a proposed further revision under that selected baseline. | Preserve the adopted downstream baseline; a difference from Core does not silently veto the revision. Separately assess current compatibility, revision reasons, independent review, and the user's decision. | +| Regrouped template | A downstream philosophy reorganizes the three template chapters while preserving a well-formed document; a separate candidate changes a commitment's meaning. | Regrouping alone is not a format failure or philosophical conflict. Identify the substantive candidate separately and do not infer authorized adoption from valid structure. | +| Complete text coverage | Change a parent section's direct provision, the preamble, or a leaf section; separately rename or move a heading. | Every direct body belongs to exactly one stable ID, including parent and preamble bodies. Detect body changes without silently losing whitespace; report title, hierarchy, and order changes separately. | +| Wording without philosophy | Review a grammatical error in a directory with no philosophy file. | Complete the wording-only task without acquiring a philosophical lookup or assessment requirement. | +| Adoption versus classification | Two sections have non-conflicting text-change classifications but their proposed combined commitments contradict one another. | Treat classification as file facts, assess the proposed whole, and retain the distinct adoption review and user decision. | +| Metadata and mirror | Check the Core English and Chinese philosophy texts after adding version metadata and IDs; check a downstream document without a lock file. | Removing only the added metadata and ID lines recovers the original Core texts exactly; both languages have the same ID order. Document-format validity does not require a derived-workspace lock or establish philosophical correctness. | +| Unavailable method | A selected philosophy does not accept a constraint of the Core review method, and the user asks whether that method can complete the requested review. | State the method limitation separately from the selected philosophy's judgments; do not replace the baseline or claim a philosophical contradiction solely from the method constraint. | diff --git a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md index 4088526..7826f16 100644 --- a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,12 +1,21 @@ +--- +format_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.0 +core_version: 0.1.0 +derived_from: null +--- # Organon 哲学：总纲与根据 + 本文是 Organon 当前哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 ## 1. 总纲 + ### 1.1 总述 + **自超越 · 自洽 · 反身** @@ -15,18 +24,22 @@ 总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入适用范围。各项的精确条件由下列分述明确。 ### 1.2 自超越 + > 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，不将任何既有构成视为生成的终点。 #### 1.2.1 生成取向 + 对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。将这种拓展视为值得追求，构成内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 #### 1.2.2 非终局性 + 不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得突破。 #### 1.2.3 成效根据与边界 + 是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。生成也不能仅由产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加来认定。 @@ -36,40 +49,48 @@ - 超越是否拓展了可理解、可构成的可能，须有可辨识的根据；对生成的自我宣称不足以证明实际成效。 ### 1.3 自洽 + > 在相同前提、概念含义与适用范围内，体系同时持有的原则和判断及其推论，不得对同一问题给出相互矛盾的判断。 #### 1.3.1 含义 + “同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了改变，就不能将其表述为从未改变。 “相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的差异不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 #### 1.3.2 适用边界 + - 不同评价或价值之间存在张力，并不直接构成矛盾；当它们在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论时，需要修正或限定。 - 自洽允许原则修订，不要求体系永远维持原来的观点。 - 自洽不等于正确或充分。一套原则可以内部一致，却依赖错误前提，或者遗漏重要问题。 ### 1.4 反身 + > 体系的生成与检验原则，同样约束体系自身，以及这些原则的形成、适用与修订。 #### 1.4.1 含义 + 反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和改变因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 #### 1.4.2 适用边界 + - “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 - 自我适用不构成自我证明。原则接受自身的检验，不等于原则因此正确。 - 一个修订由体系自身产生，不等于它因此具有充分根据。 ## 2. 根据 + > 原则与判断的根据应可说明，并接受与主张性质相称的检验。主张的强度与适用范围，应与其根据所能提供的支持相称。 ### 2.1 说明与检验责任 + 说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；可检验性要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 @@ -82,6 +103,7 @@ 起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。“主张强度”不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 ### 2.2 关系、范围与度量的限度 + 表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 @@ -90,18 +112,21 @@ 未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性，不以“能否原样重演”一次性决定全部根据的地位。 ### 2.3 能力主张 + 能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 ### 2.4 实现选择：对替代实现的开放 + > 实现方式的取舍，应有与所追求目标、价值及相关约束相联系的理由。名称、惯例或既有地位本身，不构成优先采用某种实现的充分根据。 本选择条款保留一项额外的评价承诺：身份或地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 #### 适用边界 + - 开放不意味着所有实现等价，也不保证同一目标必然存在多种可行实现。 - 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及内部方法就排除它们。 @@ -109,8 +134,10 @@ - 开放不是仅因一种实现已经存在或被惯常采用就否定它；该实现仍可凭相关理由获得优先。 ## 3. 关系与必要术语 + ### 3.1 分工与相互约束 + 总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 @@ -119,6 +146,7 @@ 自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至这些对象。根据自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 ### 3.2 必要术语 + | 中文 | 英文 | 本文中的含义 | | --- | --- | --- | From ff9baa0adaf3bcb99e055bf8f2d567ed8de9244c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YANG Jingyu Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2026 03:30:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/9] docs(core): refine philosophy wording for 0.1.1 --- PHILOSOPHY.md | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------------ zh/PHILOSOPHY.md | 39 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------- 2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 44 deletions(-) diff --git a/PHILOSOPHY.md b/PHILOSOPHY.md index a4625ef..98f6edb 100644 --- a/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ --- format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.0 -core_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.1 +core_version: 0.1.1 derived_from: null --- # Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds -This is the current authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form > A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. -The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of application. The provisions below specify the precise conditions for each. +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. ### 1.2 Self-Transcendence @@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishe #### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation -A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. Regarding that expansion as worth pursuing constitutes an intrinsic orientation. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. #### 1.2.2 Non-finality -Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual breakthroughs. +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. #### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits @@ -56,16 +56,15 @@ Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the o #### 1.3.1 Meaning -“Held simultaneously” identifies the principles, judgments, and implications that need to hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, it cannot be represented as though nothing changed. +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. -“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Differences under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. #### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits -- Tension between different evaluations or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. -- Internal consistency permits revision of principles; it does not require a system to maintain its original views forever. -- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or omitting important questions. +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. ### 1.4 Reflexivity @@ -75,14 +74,14 @@ Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the o #### 1.4.1 Meaning -Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and alteration of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. #### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits -- Equal application retains the conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. - Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. -- A revision’s being produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. ## 2. Grounds @@ -97,10 +96,10 @@ Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requi | Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | | --- | --- | --- | | Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | -| Inference | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | | Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | -Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. “Strength of a claim” does not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. ### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement @@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. -An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. Whether an event can be replayed identically does not determine the standing of all grounds at once. +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. ### 2.3 Capability Claims @@ -123,14 +122,14 @@ Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their ar > The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. -This choice provision retains an additional evaluative commitment: identity or status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. -#### Conditions and Limits +#### 2.4.1 Conditions and Limits - Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. -- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for evaluation. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern internal methods. -- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the Grounds principle. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. - Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. ## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms @@ -141,9 +140,9 @@ This choice provision retains an additional evaluative commitment: identity or s The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. -Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns why a claim receives support. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under them remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. -Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends those requirements to these objects. The grounds and limits of Grounds must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. ### 3.2 Necessary Terms @@ -151,4 +150,4 @@ Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms o | Term | Meaning in this philosophy | | --- | --- | | Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | -| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and performance; not limited to executable tests. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md index 7826f16..39ceda3 100644 --- a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,13 +1,13 @@ --- format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.0 -core_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.1 +core_version: 0.1.1 derived_from: null --- # Organon 哲学：总纲与根据 -本文是 Organon 当前哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 +本文是 Organon 哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ derived_from: null > 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，将自身及其原则纳入生成与检验，并以自洽约束这一过程。 -总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入适用范围。各项的精确条件由下列分述明确。 +总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入它们自身的生成与检验范围。各项条件由下列分述明确。 ### 1.2 自超越 @@ -31,12 +31,12 @@ derived_from: null #### 1.2.1 生成取向 -对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。将这种拓展视为值得追求，构成内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。体系将这种拓展视为值得追求时，就具有内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 #### 1.2.2 非终局性 -不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得突破。 +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 #### 1.2.3 成效根据与边界 @@ -56,15 +56,14 @@ derived_from: null #### 1.3.1 含义 -“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了改变，就不能将其表述为从未改变。 +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 -“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的差异不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的判断分歧不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 #### 1.3.2 适用边界 - 不同评价或价值之间存在张力，并不直接构成矛盾；当它们在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论时，需要修正或限定。 -- 自洽允许原则修订，不要求体系永远维持原来的观点。 - 自洽不等于正确或充分。一套原则可以内部一致，却依赖错误前提，或者遗漏重要问题。 ### 1.4 反身 @@ -75,7 +74,7 @@ derived_from: null #### 1.4.1 含义 -反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和改变因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和修订因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 #### 1.4.2 适用边界 @@ -97,10 +96,10 @@ derived_from: null | 主张类型 | 检验责任 | 不能替代该责任的做法 | | --- | --- | --- | | 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | -| 推论 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +| 推论主张 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | | 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | -起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。“主张强度”不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 ### 2.2 关系、范围与度量的限度 @@ -109,7 +108,7 @@ derived_from: null 度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 -未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性，不以“能否原样重演”一次性决定全部根据的地位。 +未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性。 ### 2.3 能力主张 @@ -123,14 +122,14 @@ derived_from: null > 实现方式的取舍，应有与所追求目标、价值及相关约束相联系的理由。名称、惯例或既有地位本身，不构成优先采用某种实现的充分根据。 -本选择条款保留一项额外的评价承诺：身份或地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 +本选择条款增加一项额外的评价承诺：名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 -#### 适用边界 +#### 2.4.1 适用边界 - 开放不意味着所有实现等价，也不保证同一目标必然存在多种可行实现。 -- 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及内部方法就排除它们。 -- 局部表现相同不足以证明整体等价。关系、条件和比较范围由“根据”条目约束。 +- 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及实现内部的方法就排除它们。 +- 局部表现相同不足以证明整体等价。关系、条件和比较范围受“根据”各条款约束。 - 开放不是仅因一种实现已经存在或被惯常采用就否定它；该实现仍可凭相关理由获得优先。 ## 3. 关系与必要术语 @@ -141,9 +140,9 @@ derived_from: null 总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 -自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张为何获得支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些前提下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 -自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至这些对象。根据自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 ### 3.2 必要术语 @@ -151,4 +150,4 @@ derived_from: null | 中文 | 英文 | 本文中的含义 | | --- | --- | --- | | 既有构成 | existing form | 体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。 | -| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及观察到的表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | From 5a63a8b64c3ed6abf28ce3231b28a5f08a870aa4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YANG Jingyu Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 00:08:58 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 4/9] docs(core): refine philosophy wording for 0.1.2 - 1.2.3: 'Generation cannot be established' -> 'Progress cannot be established' - 2.1: 'Assessability requires' -> 'Assessment requires' - zh mirror synchronized; version bumped to 0.1.2 (patch, no semantic change) - AGENTS.md: add local-records guidance (.local/ACTIVE.md, archive handling) --- AGENTS.md | 2 ++ PHILOSOPHY.md | 8 ++++---- zh/PHILOSOPHY.md | 8 ++++---- 3 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index 133ae45..e773c61 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@ Define relevant [validation cases](skills/references/validation.md) before a met Keep private inputs and iteration records under ignored `.local/`. The legacy archive is historical, not an active source of obligations. Preserve user configuration and original requirements. The delivered core and skills remain text-only; do not restore the legacy checker or release workflow as part of ordinary maintenance. +For local records, start with `.local/ACTIVE.md`. Keep feedback records active. Exclude `.local/archived/` from default recursive searches and do not open archive packages by default. When the task explicitly requires historical material, consult `.local/archived/INDEX.md` and retrieve only the relevant packages or members, following their recorded dependencies and restoration conditions. Archived decisions are historical evidence, not active obligations; later corrections belong in separate records linked to the originals. + ## Remote publication authorization - Remote publication includes `git push` (branches or tags), release publication, diff --git a/PHILOSOPHY.md b/PHILOSOPHY.md index 98f6edb..cfcd178 100644 --- a/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.1 -core_version: 0.1.1 +philosophy_version: 0.1.2 +core_version: 0.1.2 derived_from: null --- # Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpas #### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits -Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Generation cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. - “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. - Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment co ### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment -Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessability requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. | Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | | --- | --- | --- | diff --git a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md index 39ceda3..bbe6ba3 100644 --- a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.1 -core_version: 0.1.1 +philosophy_version: 0.1.2 +core_version: 0.1.2 derived_from: null --- # Organon 哲学：总纲与根据 @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ derived_from: null #### 1.2.3 成效根据与边界 -是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。生成也不能仅由产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加来认定。 +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。不能仅凭产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加认定取得了进展。 - “内在取向”表达 Organon 的哲学承诺，不声称所有体系事实上都会自主发展。 - 自超越不意味着体系无需外部经验、知识或协作，也不保证能够自主执行或自行改善。 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ derived_from: null ### 2.1 说明与检验责任 -说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；可检验性要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 | 主张类型 | 检验责任 | 不能替代该责任的做法 | | --- | --- | --- | From b3631f9a13f3b2200524fe0bbc5d167b22c4e982 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YANG Jingyu Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2026 22:51:20 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/9] feat: integrate Lean implementation and review skills into Core Include the approved Core 0.1.3 Assessment clarification and retained rationale evidence. Deliver standalone Lean checking, bilingual readers, source-fidelity review, and dependency-based synchronization while keeping historical failures visible. Validation: Core 53/53; outer 87/87 after the approved hash-baseline correction; both current Lean manuscript checks pass. --- AGENTS.md | 12 +- PHILOSOPHY.md | 6 +- README.md | 5 +- docs/rationale.md | 3 +- lean/.gitignore | 5 + lean/README.md | 34 + lean/VALIDATION.md | 33 + lean/core-details.md | 3517 +++++ lean/core-overview.md | 2857 +++++ lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md | 17 + .../philosophy/evidence/audit.lean | 37 + .../evidence/before-migration-kernel.json | 71 + .../before-migration-manuscript-check.json | 942 ++ .../philosophy/evidence/kernel.json | 68 + .../philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log | 4 + .../philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log | 49 + .../philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json | 941 ++ .../philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean | 176 + .../philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml | 5 + .../philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain | 1 + lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json | 1429 +++ .../reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md | 900 ++ .../reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md | 477 + .../reviews/code-informed-update.en.md | 95 + .../reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json | 894 ++ .../philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json | 904 ++ .../reviews/migration-source-comparison.md | 27 + .../reviews/migration-source-initial.md | 40 + .../reviews/source-comparison-current.md | 28 + .../reviews/source-comparison-initial.md | 34 + .../philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md | 47 + .../philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md | 39 + lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json | 1345 ++ .../philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md | 153 + .../philosophy/snapshots/source.md | 153 + .../PREREGISTERED-original.md | 17 + .../rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md | 5 + .../rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean | 21 + .../evidence/before-migration-kernel.json | 45 + .../before-migration-manuscript-check.json | 2652 ++++ .../rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json | 42 + .../evidence/lake-build.log | 4 + .../evidence/lean-audit.log | 32 + .../evidence/manuscript-check.json | 2658 ++++ .../leanified/RationaleReader.lean | 105 + .../leanified/lakefile.toml | 5 + .../leanified/lean-toolchain | 1 + .../rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json | 4166 ++++++ .../reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md | 900 ++ .../reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md | 477 + .../reviews/code-informed-update.en.md | 95 + .../reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json | 2630 ++++ .../reviews/fidelity.json | 2640 ++++ .../reviews/migration-source-comparison.md | 27 + .../reviews/migration-source-initial.md | 40 + .../reviews/source-comparison-current.md | 28 + .../reviews/source-comparison-initial.md | 34 + .../reviews/source-initial.md | 47 + .../reviews/summary.en.md | 31 + .../core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json | 4126 ++++++ .../snapshots/philosophy.md | 153 + .../rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md | 143 + lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md | 17 + .../core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean | 21 + .../evidence/before-migration-kernel.json | 45 + .../before-migration-manuscript-check.json | 2652 ++++ .../rationale/evidence/kernel.json | 42 + .../rationale/evidence/lake-build.log | 4 + .../rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log | 32 + .../rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json | 2653 ++++ .../rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean | 105 + .../rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml | 5 + .../rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain | 1 + lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json | 4155 ++++++ .../rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md | 8501 +++++++++++++ .../readers/en/rationale-overview.md | 8724 +++++++++++++ .../rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md | 10319 +++++++++++++++ .../readers/zh/rationale-overview.md | 10542 +++++++++++++++ .../reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md | 900 ++ .../reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md | 477 + .../reviews/code-informed-update.en.md | 95 + .../reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json | 2630 ++++ .../rationale/reviews/fidelity.json | 2630 ++++ .../reviews/source-comparison-current.md | 28 + .../reviews/source-comparison-initial.md | 34 + .../rationale/reviews/source-initial.md | 47 + .../rationale/reviews/summary.en.md | 31 + lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json | 4119 ++++++ .../rationale/snapshots/philosophy.md | 153 + .../core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md | 143 + .../reader-validation-before-migration.md | 23 + lean/rationale-details.md | 8521 +++++++++++++ lean/rationale-overview.md | 8746 +++++++++++++ lean/validation/final-node-tests.json | 8 + lean/validation/final-skill-format.json | 8 + lean/validation/final-source-format.json | 28 + lean/validation/final-translator-format.json | 8 + .../hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json | 11 + .../independent-review.md | 5 + .../hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json | 11 + lean/validation/independent-final-review.md | 25 + lean/validation/migration/diff-review.json | 28 + lean/validation/migration/diff-review.md | 41 + .../migration/final-core-tests.json | 11 + .../migration/final-entrypoint-results.json | 27 + ...non-core-lean-natural-language-format.json | 12 + ...nal-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json | 12 + ...-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json | 12 + .../final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json | 12 + .../migration/final-outer-tests.json | 11 + .../validation/migration/final-source-en.json | 13 + .../validation/migration/final-source-zh.json | 13 + .../migration/node-tests-standalone.json | 11 + .../migration/parser-cli-parity.txt | 55 + .../philosophy-current-standalone.json | 14 + .../rationale-current-standalone.json | 14 + .../rationale-history-base-standalone.json | 12 + .../rationale-history-current-standalone.json | 14 + .../migration/skill-actual-results.json | 67 + lean/validation/migration/skill-responses.md | 27 + .../preexisting-management-failure.json | 7 + lean/validation/relocated-philosophy.json | 937 ++ lean/validation/relocated-rationale.json | 2647 ++++ lean/validation/relocation.json | 32 + package.json | 6 + scripts/lib/frontmatter.js | 82 + scripts/lib/sections.js | 64 + skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md | 4 + .../SKILL.md | 50 + skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md | 66 + .../references/manuscript-format.md | 126 + .../references/run-format.md | 102 + .../scripts/check.js | 287 + .../scripts/manuscript.js | 168 + .../organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md | 2 + skills/references/iteration.md | 2 + skills/references/structure.md | 2 +- skills/references/validation.md | 11 + tests/lean-checker.test.js | 229 + tests/lean-manuscript.test.js | 226 + tests/standalone-runtime.test.js | 41 + zh/AGENTS.md | 8 + zh/PHILOSOPHY.md | 6 +- zh/lean/core-details.md | 4243 +++++++ zh/lean/core-overview.md | 3583 ++++++ zh/lean/rationale-details.md | 10345 +++++++++++++++ zh/lean/rationale-overview.md | 10570 ++++++++++++++++ zh/rationale.md | 3 +- 148 files changed, 147215 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) create mode 100644 lean/.gitignore create mode 100644 lean/README.md create mode 100644 lean/VALIDATION.md create mode 100644 lean/core-details.md create mode 100644 lean/core-overview.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/philosophy.md create mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md create mode 100644 lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md create mode 100644 lean/rationale-details.md create mode 100644 lean/rationale-overview.md create mode 100644 lean/validation/final-node-tests.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/final-skill-format.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/final-source-format.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/final-translator-format.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/independent-review.md create mode 100644 lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/independent-final-review.md create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/diff-review.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/diff-review.md create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-core-tests.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-entrypoint-results.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-lean-natural-language-format.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-outer-tests.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-source-en.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-source-zh.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/node-tests-standalone.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/parser-cli-parity.txt create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/philosophy-current-standalone.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/rationale-current-standalone.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-base-standalone.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-current-standalone.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/skill-actual-results.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/skill-responses.md create mode 100644 lean/validation/preexisting-management-failure.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/relocated-philosophy.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/relocated-rationale.json create mode 100644 lean/validation/relocation.json create mode 100644 package.json create mode 100644 scripts/lib/frontmatter.js create mode 100644 scripts/lib/sections.js create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language/SKILL.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/references/manuscript-format.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/references/run-format.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js create mode 100644 tests/lean-checker.test.js create mode 100644 tests/lean-manuscript.test.js create mode 100644 tests/standalone-runtime.test.js create mode 100644 zh/lean/core-details.md create mode 100644 zh/lean/core-overview.md create mode 100644 zh/lean/rationale-details.md create mode 100644 zh/lean/rationale-overview.md diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index e773c61..f6db0a2 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -18,10 +18,20 @@ For repository text you create or revise and for user-facing replies, use gramma Define relevant [validation cases](skills/references/validation.md) before a method change and retain actual results and independent review locally. Update affected documents and links together. Do not represent file checks, agent agreement, or self-application as proof of philosophical correctness. -Keep private inputs and iteration records under ignored `.local/`. The legacy archive is historical, not an active source of obligations. Preserve user configuration and original requirements. The delivered core and skills remain text-only; do not restore the legacy checker or release workflow as part of ordinary maintenance. +Keep private inputs and iteration records under ignored `.local/`. The legacy archive is historical, not an active source of obligations. Preserve user configuration and original requirements. Core delivers philosophical text together with maintained Lean implementations, evidence, reader manuscripts and their checking tools. These tools do not acquire philosophical authority. Do not restore the retired legacy checker or release workflow as part of ordinary maintenance. For local records, start with `.local/ACTIVE.md`. Keep feedback records active. Exclude `.local/archived/` from default recursive searches and do not open archive packages by default. When the task explicitly requires historical material, consult `.local/archived/INDEX.md` and retrieve only the relevant packages or members, following their recorded dependencies and restoration conditions. Archived decisions are historical evidence, not active obligations; later corrections belong in separate records linked to the originals. +## Lean evidence maintenance + +Use [organon-core-leanify-prove](skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md) for source-faithful formalization and [organon-core-lean-natural-language](skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language/SKILL.md) for code explanation and reader editions. [Lean delivery](lean/README.md) identifies current and historical run objects and the standalone checks. English philosophy remains authoritative; a mismatch is a correspondence finding, not permission to change a philosophical commitment. + +Before changing philosophy, rationale, source versions, encoded statements, assumptions, or tool/skill behavior that affects evidence, identify the affected source units, declarations, review objects and bilingual manuscripts. Preserve the preceding snapshots and judgments. Content hashes matter even without a version bump; a version number alone cannot establish currentness. Unrelated repository changes do not require fresh semantic review of every proof. + +Do not declare the affected maintenance complete until required builds, declaration/dependency audits, source-fidelity review and both manuscript granularities in English and Chinese have been synchronized and checked. Reuse unchanged proof or review material only with its exact objects verified and reuse disclosed. Changed source or interpretation needs a new reviewed object; do not merely refresh old expected hashes. Missing tools or independent review leave the dependent stage explicitly incomplete while unrelated work may continue. + +This completion condition requires accurate evidence and states, not complete formalization or successful proof of every claim. Preserve limited, failed, incomplete, inapplicable and stale results with their reasons. Separate historical replay from current-source approval. [Translation guidance](zh/AGENTS.md#lean-对照稿) preserves those distinctions in Chinese. Ordinary philosophical assessment does not require Lean. + ## Remote publication authorization - Remote publication includes `git push` (branches or tags), release publication, diff --git a/PHILOSOPHY.md b/PHILOSOPHY.md index cfcd178..3705ff1 100644 --- a/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.2 -core_version: 0.1.2 +philosophy_version: 0.1.3 +core_version: 0.1.3 derived_from: null --- # Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment co ### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment -Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. | Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | | --- | --- | --- | diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 84725f5..8c7a1fb 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@ Organon is a text-centered philosophical core: **Self-Transcendence, Internal Co - [Philosophy](PHILOSOPHY.md) is the current English authority, including the meanings and limits of its provisions. - [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) explains contributions, dependencies, counterexamples, and applications. It cannot independently add obligations to the core. +- Lean reader editions: [Core overview](lean/core-overview.md) and [line explanations](lean/core-details.md); [rationale overview](lean/rationale-overview.md) and [line explanations](lean/rationale-details.md). [Chinese Core](zh/lean/core-overview.md) and [Chinese rationale](zh/lean/rationale-overview.md) mirror these bounded results. These companion manuscripts report encoding and review limits; they are not philosophical commitments or proof of whole-text correctness. - Chinese translations are maintained under `zh/` for readability and follow the English authority. - [Agent guidance](AGENTS.md) identifies how to work on this repository. The skills below are revisable applications under this repository's goals, not additional philosophical truths. - [Philosophy resolution](skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md) selects the adopted baseline; the [document format](skills/references/structure.md) defines version metadata, stable text-unit IDs, and a revisable starting template. @@ -18,6 +19,8 @@ Organon is a text-centered philosophical core: **Self-Transcendence, Internal Co | `organon-core-absorb` | Decide whether input warrants revising the philosophy; develop, review, and implement authorized adoption with necessary synchronization. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md) | | `organon-core-principled-review` | Review an object under six principles and stated standards; return findings, including bounded review of the method and criteria. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) | | `organon-core-wording-review` | Review text for grammatical correctness, precision, ambiguity, terminology, redundancy, and necessary qualifications. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md) | +| `organon-core-leanify-prove` | Review source correspondence, check conditional proofs and countermodels, and maintain current evidence. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md) | +| `organon-core-lean-natural-language` | Explain actual Lean definitions and proofs; produce blind translations and bilingual reader editions. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language/SKILL.md) | Give an agent the relevant entrypoint and your input, for example: “Use `organon-core-assess` to assess this design under its stated assumptions,” or “Use `organon-core-absorb` to consider whether this counterexample warrants a change.” These skills use English instructions and respond in the user's language. They can be invoked separately but reference this repository's guidance; copying a skill folder alone does not make a standalone distribution. Load the entrypoint explicitly if the host does not discover this directory; no automatic installation or discovery is assumed. @@ -43,6 +46,6 @@ Validation examines actual reasoning and behavior, including justified non-absor The former `ORGANON.md`, checker, fixtures, governance records, and CI were retired together. Their original relative paths and archive hash inventory are retained locally in `.local/archived/to_absorb/legacy-core/`; the archive is ignored and is not included in a fresh clone. Earlier tracked versions remain in Git history. Completed local requirements, discussions, and iteration records are collected under `.local/archived/`, with an index in its `README.md`. -This core and its skills contain no runtime scripts, executable checker, or automated release mechanism. One-off file integrity checks used during maintenance do not become philosophical requirements. +Core includes Lean implementations, their checking tools, shared parsing and bilingual reader manuscripts. See [standalone Lean use and evidence](lean/README.md) and [dependency-driven maintenance](AGENTS.md#lean-evidence-maintenance). No automated release mechanism is introduced; checking a model does not establish philosophical correctness. Licensed under [MIT](LICENSE). diff --git a/docs/rationale.md b/docs/rationale.md index 0722cc8..e55f231 100644 --- a/docs/rationale.md +++ b/docs/rationale.md @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-spe | Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. | This violates internal consistency. Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. | | A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. | This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. | | Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. | Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. Grounds requires examination of the support relation. | +| A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. | The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. | | A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. | It can be assessed as a value commitment. Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. | | A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. | It may provide corresponding limited support. Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. | | A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. | Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. | @@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitme | Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | | --- | --- | --- | | English authority with a corresponding Chinese version | The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. | No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. Another project could select a different language. | -| A text-centered core and script-free skills | The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. | Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; their absence here is a design choice. | +| A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling | Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable. Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support. | Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness. Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment. The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints. | | `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` | Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. | Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. | | `organon-core-principled-review` | A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. | Findings retain their standards and limits; they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. | | External `grill-me/grilling` | Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. | A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. | diff --git a/lean/.gitignore b/lean/.gitignore new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bc9968e --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/.gitignore @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +core-v0.1.3/*/evidence/checks/ +core-v0.1.3/*/leanified/.lake/ +core-v0.1.3/*/leanified/lake-manifest.json +!core-v0.1.3/*/evidence/lean-audit.log +!core-v0.1.3/*/evidence/lake-build.log diff --git a/lean/README.md b/lean/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7128b59 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +# Lean implementations and reader editions + +Core owns the Lean projects, evidence, checkers and two skills. This repository can be copied or cloned on its own; an outer AgentOrganon checkout is not required. The English [philosophy](../PHILOSOPHY.md) remains authoritative. Implementations and skills are revisable support for its study, not additional philosophical commitments. + +## Read and inspect + +| Source | English | Chinese | Current run and exact Lean code | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| Philosophy 0.1.3, all 22 units | [Overview](core-overview.md), [line explanations](core-details.md) | [Overview](../zh/lean/core-overview.md), [line explanations](../zh/lean/core-details.md) | [Run](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json), [CoreReader.lean](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean) | +| Rationale with the Core-tooling design explanation | [Overview](rationale-overview.md), [line explanations](rationale-details.md) | [Overview](../zh/lean/rationale-overview.md), [line explanations](../zh/lean/rationale-details.md) | [Run](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json), [RationaleReader.lean](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean) | + +The current 495 navigation entries report 14 limited correspondences, 2 rejected correspondences, 371 incomplete entries and 108 structural or inapplicable entries. Zero complete source claims are reported passed. These counts are not a philosophical quality score. The revised rationale row adds one inventory clause; no proof or fidelity grade was upgraded. All 228 nonblank Lean lines retain English and Chinese explanations. + +## Standalone use + +Use [organon-core-leanify-prove](../skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md) and [organon-core-lean-natural-language](../skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language/SKILL.md) by their entrypoints. They accept ordinary input as well as Organon text. Preserve the caller's explicit adopted baseline; direct Core invocation uses the existing [selection contract](../skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md). Code-only explanation does not require a philosophical baseline. Language and `--explain-lines` are skill inputs, not a translation executable. + +With Node >=22, RTK, and the already installed `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1` toolchain, run from the Core root: + +```sh +rtk proxy node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy --manuscript manuscript.json +rtk proxy node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools --manuscript manuscript.json +rtk proxy node --test +``` + +Omit `--manuscript manuscript.json` to check only a run's frozen sources, build, declarations, cases and dependencies. The manuscript option also binds current source/baseline, both languages and both granularities, exact excerpts and reported review objects. It does not certify source fidelity, reviewer independence or translation accuracy. No third-party Node packages or Mathlib are required; the checker does not install or silently change the toolchain. + +## Maintenance and history + +Follow [Lean evidence maintenance](../AGENTS.md#lean-evidence-maintenance) when actual source, code, assumption or method/tool dependencies change. Current checks and bilingual synchronization are completion conditions; successful proof of every philosophical claim is not. Hash changes matter without a philosophy-version change. Philosophy 0.1.3 is unchanged; the revised rationale has a new source hash and a separate run. + +The [preceding rationale run](core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json) and its [English historical reader](core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md) / [Chinese historical reader](core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md) remain available. Its frozen kernel evidence can be replayed with the base command. Its manuscript check deliberately fails as stale against the current rationale. Original source/code/review objects are retained; relocation changes paths and reader hashes, not what historical proofs established. Earlier check results prefixed `before-migration-` are historical, not certification of the new layout. + +Current run reviews distinguish initial source assessment, unchanged code backtranslation reused by exact hash, and informed migration comparison. The two rejected support/grounds mappings remain rejected. [Migration validation](VALIDATION.md) reports actual standalone and compatibility results; [preceding validation](history/reader-validation-before-migration.md) retains the earlier task's results. Private iteration records and caches are not part of the portable delivery. No global installation, release workflow or remote publication is implied. diff --git a/lean/VALIDATION.md b/lean/VALIDATION.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..009b57c --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/VALIDATION.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ +# Core Lean migration validation + +Actual local validation dated 2026-09-13. Core now contains the implementation and can run without the outer repository. This record describes migration and evidence integrity, not completion of philosophical formalization. English and Chinese philosophy texts remain byte-identical at version 0.1.3; the rationale implementation row has a new source object. + +## Hash-baseline repair follow-up + +After the user requested repair, the two fixed expectations in the outer management test were updated to the independently verified, previously approved bilingual Core 0.1.3 bodies. The source text, normalization algorithm and remaining assertions were unchanged. [Independent review](validation/hash-baseline-followup/independent-review.md) also checked that subsequent body mutations still fail the fixed-hash guard. + +Fresh full runs now pass: **Core 53/53** ([output](validation/hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json)) and **outer 87/87** ([output](validation/hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json)), with zero skips. Both current Lean manuscript checks also pass. The migration-time failure and its raw outputs below are retained as historical evidence; they are not the current test status. + +## Migration-time results before the repair + +| Check | Actual result | Evidence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Core `rtk proxy node --test` | 53 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped | [Full output](validation/migration/final-core-tests.json) | +| Outer `rtk proxy node --test` | 86 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped | [Full output](validation/migration/final-outer-tests.json) | +| Current philosophy and rationale runs, Core and outer entrypoints | Build/audit/manuscript pass; results identical apart from generated evidence locations | [Entrypoint results](validation/migration/final-entrypoint-results.json) | +| Core-only ordinary copy, both current manuscripts | Pass, current source and baseline; 18/10 declarations, 123/372 entries | [Philosophy](validation/migration/philosophy-current-standalone.json), [rationale](validation/migration/rationale-current-standalone.json) | +| Core-only ordinary copy, all Core tests | 53 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped | [Full output](validation/migration/node-tests-standalone.json) | +| Historical rationale in ordinary copy | Frozen kernel passes; current manuscript is rejected as stale while kernel remains valid | [Base](validation/migration/rationale-history-base-standalone.json), [currentness](validation/migration/rationale-history-current-standalone.json) | +| Both source-format checks | Pass, 22 matching units | [English](validation/migration/final-source-en.json), [Chinese](validation/migration/final-source-zh.json) | +| Four Core/outer skill formats | Pass | [Core proof](validation/migration/final-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json), [Core translation](validation/migration/final-organon-core-lean-natural-language-format.json), [outer proof](validation/migration/final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json), [outer translation](validation/migration/final-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json) | +| Independent source, method, wording and bilingual difference review | No unresolved actionable finding within reviewed scope; initial and informed stages distinguished | [Final review](validation/migration/diff-review.md), [initial source review](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md), [informed comparison](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md) | + +At migration time, the outer suite was **not green**. Its then-unchanged management test expected an older philosophy-body hash; the same failure was reproduced before this migration and is retained in the [preceding validation](history/reader-validation-before-migration.md). No test expectation or philosophy text was changed during that migration stage; the justified follow-up above corrects only the stale expectations. + +The [recorded parser/CLI comparison](validation/migration/parser-cli-parity.txt) shows the shared parser was compared with the frozen original on 22 variants, including malformed input, CR/CRLF, whitespace, direct bodies, structure, rendering and Extensions behavior. Twelve original/Core/outer CLI checks on the original frozen packages produced matching results. Subsequent current-package checks above separately validate the new layout and revised rationale. The forwarding APIs retain their exported functions and old CLI usage behavior; outer `coreWarnings` retains its configuration source. + +[Independent actual skill use](validation/migration/skill-responses.md), with [command results](validation/migration/skill-actual-results.json), covered a two-clause ordinary source, a Lean-only premise projection, an explicit downstream baseline and an invalid explicit path. A first attempt with no declaration inventory was rejected and preserved. A later conditional interface passed mechanical checking while its source fidelity remained incomplete. The identity example returned its assumed premise; it was not presented as an independent proof of that premise. The explicit downstream version was retained; missing explicit selection did not fall back to Core. These are bounded behavior observations, not proof of general agent capability. + +The current corpus has 14 limited correspondences, 2 rejected correspondences, 371 incomplete entries and 108 structural/inapplicable entries: **zero complete source claims are marked passed**. The revised rationale row replaces six inventory clauses with seven, with no theorem mappings or promoted grades. Unchanged code explanations are explicitly reused, not newly blind-reviewed. Original fidelity records are retained as `fidelity-before-migration.json`; original source/code/initial-review bytes are preserved. + +All checker outputs retain `semantic_status: not_evaluated`. Binding checks do not establish semantic fidelity, independent authorship or accurate translation. Source correspondence failures remain modeling findings, not proofs that the philosophy is false. Migration completion does not imply full formalization. No global installation, push or remote publication was performed. diff --git a/lean/core-details.md b/lean/core-details.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7f26e92 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-details.md @@ -0,0 +1,3517 @@ +# Core — Lean line explanations + +Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59`. [Frozen source](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](core-overview.md). + +These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. + +No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. + +Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'incomplete': 107, 'not_applicable': 7, 'limited': 7, 'failed': 2}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. + + +## organon.preamble + + + + + +### c-10-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-10-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-12-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-12-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter and Grounds constrain one another; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-12-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-12-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter + + + + + +### organon.charter · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## organon.charter.overview + + + + + +### c-22-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-22-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-24-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-24-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The provisions below specify the conditions for each. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence + + + + + +### c-29-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-29-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation + + + + + +### c-34-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-34-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-34-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality + + + + + +### c-39-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-39-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-39-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These remain within the scope of possible change; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-39-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits + + + + + +### c-44-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-44-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-44-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-46-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-46-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-47-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-48-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-48-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-49-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-49-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency + + + + + +### c-54-c1 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.Consistent` — [CoreReader.lean:81](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L81); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-81). + + +```lean +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) +``` + +- `CoreReader.joint_conflict` — [CoreReader.lean:87](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-87). + + +```lean +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.meaning + + + + + +### c-59-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-59-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set` — [CoreReader.lean:94](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L94); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-94). + + +```lean +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### c-59-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-59-c4 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.ChangeReported` — [CoreReader.lean:111](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L111); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-111). + + +```lean +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false +``` + +- `CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report` — [CoreReader.lean:117](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L117); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-117). + + +```lean +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### c-61-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-61-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.distinct_contexts` — [CoreReader.lean:101](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-101). + + +```lean +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### c-61-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.limits + + + + + +### c-66-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-66-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-67-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-67-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity + + + + + +### c-72-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning + + + + + +### c-77-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-77-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-77-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.limits + + + + + +### c-82-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-82-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-82-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-83-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-application does not constitute self-proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-83-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Passing the system's own finite test implies its owned principle is correct at every natural input. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness` — [CoreReader.lean:167](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L167); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-167). + + +```lean +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### c-84-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.grounds + + + + + +### c-89-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-89-c2 · Failed correspondence + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.ObservationComplete` — [CoreReader.lean:125](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L125); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-125). + + +```lean +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed +``` + +- `CoreReader.observation_gap` — [CoreReader.lean:130](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L130); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-130). + + +```lean +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 +``` + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:138](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L138); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-138). + + +```lean +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ +``` + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:145](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L145); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-145). + + +```lean +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + +## organon.grounds.assessment + + + + + +### c-94-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-94-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-94-c3 · Failed correspondence + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:58](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L58); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-58). + + +```lean +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### c-94-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-94-c5 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.Duties` — [CoreReader.lean:9](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L9); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-9). + + +```lean +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect +``` + +- `CoreReader.mixed_projection` — [CoreReader.lean:29](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L29); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-29). + + +```lean +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ +``` + +- `CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture` — [CoreReader.lean:43](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L43); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-43). + + +```lean +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ +``` + +- `CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:50](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L50); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-50). + + +```lean +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### c-94-c6 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive` — [CoreReader.lean:36](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L36); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-36). + + +```lean +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl +``` + +- `CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:66](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L66); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-66). + + +```lean +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### c-98-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Empirical claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### c-98-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-98-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-99-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inferential claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### c-99-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-99-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-100-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Value commitment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### c-100-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-100-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-102-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-102-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-102-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-102-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.grounds.scope + + + + + +### c-107-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-107-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-107-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-109-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-109-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-109-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-109-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-111-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-111-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.grounds.capabilities + + + + + +### c-116-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-116-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-116-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-118-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-118-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-118-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-118-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-118-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations + + + + + +### c-123-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-123-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-125-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-125-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-125-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations.limits + + + + + +### c-130-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-131-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-131-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-132-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-132-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-133-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-133-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relevant reasons may still give it priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.relationships + + + + + +### organon.relationships · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## organon.relationships.roles + + + + + +### c-141-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-141-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-141-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-141-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-141-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Each commitment needs its own reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-143-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-143-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-143-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-143-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-143-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-145-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-145-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-145-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-145-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-145-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## organon.relationships.terms + + + + + +### c-152-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Existing form +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### c-152-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### c-153-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### c-153-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + + + + + + + +### c-153-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +not limited to executable tests. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## Complete checked code and line explanations + +Code SHA256: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803`. The initial translation was saved before source comparison; the current code revision below has an explicitly informed update. + + +```lean +namespace CoreReader + +inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value + deriving DecidableEq + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect + +def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + Duties applicable examined claim grounds + +def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.mixed_projection +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected + +inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo + deriving DecidableEq + +def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ + (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ + (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ + (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.joint_conflict +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.distinct_contexts +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-61-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.ChangeReported +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.ObservationComplete +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.observation_gap +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +structure SelfAssessingSystem where + ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool + samples : List Nat + +def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := + s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple + +def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := + ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad + +end CoreReader +``` + + + + + **L1** Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. + + + + **L3** Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. + + + + **L4** Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. + + + + **L6** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L7** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L8** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L9** Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + + + + **L10** Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. + + + + **L11** Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. + + + + **L13** Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. + + + + **L14** Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. + + + + **L15** Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. + + + + **L17** Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + + + + **L18** It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. + + + + **L20** Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + + + + **L21** It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. + + + + **L23** Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + + + + **L24** It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. + + + + **L26** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L27** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L28** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L29** Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. + + + + **L30** Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. + + + + **L31** Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. + + + + **L33** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L34** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L35** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L36** Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. + + + + **L37** Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. + + + + **L38** Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. + + + + **L40** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L41** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L42** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L43** State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. + + + + **L44** Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. + + + + **L45** Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. + + + + **L47** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L48** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L49** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L50** State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. + + + + **L51** Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. + + + + **L52** Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. + + + + **L53** Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. + + + + **L55** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L56** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L57** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L58** State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. + + + + **L59** Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. + + + + **L60** Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. + + + + **L61** Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. + + + + **L63** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L64** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L65** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L66** State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. + + + + **L67** Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. + + + + **L69** Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. + + + + **L70** Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. + + + + **L72** Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. + + + + **L73** The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. + + + + **L74** The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. + + + + **L75** A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. + + + + **L76** The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. + + + + **L78** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L79** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L80** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L81** Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. + + + + **L82** Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. + + + + **L84** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L85** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L86** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L87** State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. + + + + **L88** Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. + + + + **L89** Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. + + + + **L91** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L92** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L93** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L94** State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. + + + + **L95** For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. + + + + **L96** Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. + + + + **L98** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L99** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L100** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L101** State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. + + + + **L102** Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. + + + + **L103** Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. + + + + **L104** Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. + + + + **L105** Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. + + + + **L106** Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. + + + + **L108** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L109** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L110** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L111** Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. + + + + **L112** Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. + + + + **L114** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L115** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L116** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L117** Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. + + + + **L118** State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. + + + + **L119** Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. + + + + **L120** Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. + + + + **L122** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L123** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L124** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L125** Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. + + + + **L127** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L128** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L129** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L130** State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. + + + + **L131** Assume completeness for contradiction. + + + + **L132** Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. + + + + **L133** Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. + + + + **L135** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L136** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L137** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L138** Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. + + + + **L139** State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. + + + + **L140** Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. + + + + **L142** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L143** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L144** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L145** Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. + + + + **L146** State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. + + + + **L147** Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. + + + + **L148** Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. + + + + **L149** Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. + + + + **L150** Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. + + + + **L152** Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. + + + + **L154** Declare SelfAssessingSystem as a record with a stored Boolean-valued natural-number predicate and a sample list; no invariant relates the fields. + + + + **L155** Declare ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool, an arbitrary Boolean-valued function stored in the system record. The field name alone does not establish authorship, ownership, or philosophical status. + + + + **L156** Declare samples as a finite list of natural numbers, possibly empty or containing duplicates; no completeness or selection requirement is imposed. + + + + **L158** Define runOwnAssessment as a Boolean-valued function of the whole SelfAssessingSystem record. + + + + **L159** Run List.all over the stored samples using that same record's ownPrinciple function. The result is true exactly when every listed input evaluates to true; on an empty list it is true. This is an actual finite Boolean computation, not a supplied proposition. + + + + **L161** Begin the concrete sampleSystem record definition. + + + + **L162** Store the function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n on Nat and the singleton sample list [1]. decide converts each decidable arithmetic proposition into a Boolean. This duplicates the expression in proposedPrinciple but does not reference that definition. + + + + **L164** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L165** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L166** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L167** Begin the theorem contrasting this system's finite assessment result with all-input satisfaction of its stored function. + + + + **L168** State that runOwnAssessment returns true on sampleSystem, while it is false that every natural number makes the same sampleSystem.ownPrinciple return true. The universal n is inferred as Nat. + + + + **L169** Split the conjunction into the computed assessment equality and the negated universal function equality. + + + + **L170** For the first conjunct, unfold runOwnAssessment and sampleSystem to List.all on [1] using the equation-deciding function. + + + + **L171** Compute the singleton assessment: the equation holds at 1, so the all result equals true. + + + + **L172** For the second conjunct, assume the stored Boolean function returns true at every natural number. + + + + **L173** Instantiate that universal Boolean equality at 0. + + + + **L174** Unfold sampleSystem and simplify: the equation at 0 is false, so the hypothesis asserts false = true and yields a contradiction. + + + + **L176** Close the CoreReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-overview.md b/lean/core-overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2672758 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,2857 @@ +# Core — claim overview + +Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59`. [Frozen source](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](core-details.md). + +These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. + +No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. + +Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'incomplete': 107, 'not_applicable': 7, 'limited': 7, 'failed': 2}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. + + +## organon.preamble + + + + + +### c-10-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-10-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-10-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-10-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter and Grounds constrain one another; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c4) + + + + +## organon.charter + + + + + +### organon.charter · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#organon.charter) + + + + +## organon.charter.overview + + + + + +### c-22-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-22-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-22-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-22-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-24-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-24-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-24-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The provisions below specify the conditions for each. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-24-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence + + + + + +### c-29-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-29-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-29-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-29-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation + + + + + +### c-34-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-34-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-34-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-34-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-34-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-34-c3) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality + + + + + +### c-39-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-39-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-39-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These remain within the scope of possible change; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-39-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c4) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits + + + + + +### c-44-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-44-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-44-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-44-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-44-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-44-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-46-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-46-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-46-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-46-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-47-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-47-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-48-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-48-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-48-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-48-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-49-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-49-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-49-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-49-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency + + + + + +### c-54-c1 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.Consistent` — [CoreReader.lean:81](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L81); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-81). + +- `CoreReader.joint_conflict` — [CoreReader.lean:87](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-87). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-54-c1) + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.meaning + + + + + +### c-59-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-59-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set` — [CoreReader.lean:94](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L94); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-94). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-59-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-59-c4 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.ChangeReported` — [CoreReader.lean:111](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L111); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-111). + +- `CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report` — [CoreReader.lean:117](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L117); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-117). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-61-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-61-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-61-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.distinct_contexts` — [CoreReader.lean:101](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-101). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-61-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-61-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-61-c3) + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.limits + + + + + +### c-66-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-66-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-66-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-66-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-67-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-67-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-67-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-67-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity + + + + + +### c-72-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-72-c1) + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning + + + + + +### c-77-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-77-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-77-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-77-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-77-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-77-c3) + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.limits + + + + + +### c-82-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-82-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-82-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-82-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-82-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-82-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-83-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-application does not constitute self-proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-83-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-83-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Passing the system's own finite test implies its owned principle is correct at every natural input. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness` — [CoreReader.lean:167](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L167); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-167). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-83-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-84-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-84-c1) + + + + +## organon.grounds + + + + + +### c-89-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-89-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-89-c2 · Failed correspondence + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.ObservationComplete` — [CoreReader.lean:125](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L125); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-125). + +- `CoreReader.observation_gap` — [CoreReader.lean:130](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L130); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-130). + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:138](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L138); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-138). + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:145](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L145); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-145). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-89-c2) + + + + +## organon.grounds.assessment + + + + + +### c-94-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c3 · Failed correspondence + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:58](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L58); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-58). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c5 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.Duties` — [CoreReader.lean:9](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L9); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-9). + +- `CoreReader.mixed_projection` — [CoreReader.lean:29](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L29); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-29). + +- `CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture` — [CoreReader.lean:43](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L43); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-43). + +- `CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:50](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L50); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-50). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c5) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c6 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive` — [CoreReader.lean:36](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L36); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-36). + +- `CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:66](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L66); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-66). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c6) + + + + + + + +### c-98-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Empirical claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-98-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-98-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-98-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-98-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-98-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-99-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inferential claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-99-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-99-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-99-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-99-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-99-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-100-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Value commitment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-100-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-100-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-100-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-100-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-100-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c4) + + + + +## organon.grounds.scope + + + + + +### c-107-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-107-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-107-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-107-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-107-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-107-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-111-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-111-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-111-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-111-c2) + + + + +## organon.grounds.capabilities + + + + + +### c-116-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-116-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-116-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-116-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-116-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-116-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c5) + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations + + + + + +### c-123-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-123-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-123-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-123-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-125-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-125-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-125-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-125-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-125-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-125-c3) + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations.limits + + + + + +### c-130-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-130-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-131-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-131-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-131-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-131-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-132-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-132-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-132-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-132-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-133-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-133-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-133-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relevant reasons may still give it priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-133-c2) + + + + +## organon.relationships + + + + + +### organon.relationships · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#organon.relationships) + + + + +## organon.relationships.roles + + + + + +### c-141-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Each commitment needs its own reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c5) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c5) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c5) + + + + +## organon.relationships.terms + + + + + +### c-152-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Existing form +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-152-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-152-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-152-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-153-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-153-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-153-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-153-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-153-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +not limited to executable tests. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-153-c3) + + diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a65a742 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# New compact models — registered before Lean authoring + +These are new bounded encodings for readable evidence, not unchanged replays of all older projects. Historical Core/Rationale models remain untouched; unretained results do not silently become current results. Inventory all original content, map only explicit selected fragments. No whole philosophical text is expected to be proved. + +Core fragments: responsibility quantified over actual applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, independently of labels; domain relation supplied and not self-validating. Preserve empirical/value mixed applicability via concrete claim-aspect fixture and wrong-grounds/reported-label variants. The full articulation, basis quality, proportionality, value criticism and all listed empirical/inferential duties remain unmodeled by this narrower interface; do not label whole Assessment passed. Separate sufficient support from truth using a finite observation set with an explicitly stated universal-coverage sufficiency criterion for all natural inputs; bounded observations cannot establish a universal property, whether the property is actually true or false. + +Consistency: whole held-set input to an explicit consequence relation, context/question/polarity; a concrete P, P→Q, ¬Q fixture uses a registered one-step consequence for this case, not a general logical calculus. Joint inconsistency, removal of ¬Q, and opposite judgments under distinct contexts get actual probes. A separate changed-content reporting obligation is an interface, not an assertion a real change was reported. + +Reflexivity: concrete arithmetic principle n+1=2*n checked on sample1 can pass while counterexample0 refutes it; evaluating oneself is a separate recorded action. This supplies a relevant finite counterexample to self-assessment alone implying correctness, not a general diagnosis of every system or proof that the normative provision is obeyed. + +Rationale R1: actual conditional identity theorem h:P⊢P plus a true coded arithmetic claim and false different prose claim; exact arithmetic counterexample illustrates that a proof of one statement does not prove a different stronger statement. Missing bridge is a modeling finding, not proof that philosophical commitments fail. It is an illustration of the accepted R1 row, never a mathematical proof of every prose correspondence judgment. + +Rationale software/L119: ServiceState contains acknowledged and cached natural values; direct read reads acknowledged, cache reads cached; updateOnly changes acknowledged and retains cached. Initial10/10, original latencies5/2,budget6 both acceptable; update11 yields11/10. Original-match plus later-mismatch witnesses failure of global equivalence. Positive invalidating update sets both11; unchanged update10 retains agreement. Withdraw any mapping to method-stage lists. Separate tightened budget3 is a different context, not the original case. + +Rationale removal arguments and value/historical/general method effectiveness claims remain source-inventoried but unproved unless a reviewed direct correspondence is available. No Boolean encoding of arbitrary truth values substitutes for an empirical or value argument. All new declarations and cases will be root-imported and audited with fixed Lean4.33.1/core; no project axioms or sorry. + +Source initial and code-only explanation are independent roles. Initial coding model tests may precede fidelity acceptance, but published passed/limited states require the recorded corresponding review. New model tradeoff: intentionally small exact worked fragments for readers instead of importing large legacy interfaces with stale provenance; report reduced retained proof coverage, not a formalization improvement by line count. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a0fd49a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +import CoreReader +#check CoreReader.Duties +#print axioms CoreReader.Duties +#check CoreReader.mixed_projection +#print axioms CoreReader.mixed_projection +#check CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive +#print axioms CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive +#check CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture +#print axioms CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture +#check CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected +#print axioms CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected +#check CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected +#print axioms CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected +#check CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected +#print axioms CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected +#check CoreReader.Consistent +#print axioms CoreReader.Consistent +#check CoreReader.joint_conflict +#print axioms CoreReader.joint_conflict +#check CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set +#print axioms CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set +#check CoreReader.distinct_contexts +#print axioms CoreReader.distinct_contexts +#check CoreReader.ChangeReported +#print axioms CoreReader.ChangeReported +#check CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report +#print axioms CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report +#check CoreReader.ObservationComplete +#print axioms CoreReader.ObservationComplete +#check CoreReader.observation_gap +#print axioms CoreReader.observation_gap +#check CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion +#print axioms CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion +#check CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion +#print axioms CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion +#check CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness +#print axioms CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c9036fc --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json @@ -0,0 +1,71 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "CoreReader.Duties", + "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "CoreReader.Consistent", + "CoreReader.joint_conflict", + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", + "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" + ], + "dependencies": { + "CoreReader.Duties": [], + "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.Consistent": [], + "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], + "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ + "propext" + ] + }, + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "baseline_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" + }, + "raw_summary_sha256": "f3d0183c54061a27925a6707df475a0bbb48adbc9414c65c91b4c26ffd8d982e", + "record_note": "Extract of an actual check; machine-specific evidence directory omitted. Kernel checking does not validate fidelity." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1bf4a8c --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,942 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "CoreReader.Duties", + "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "CoreReader.Consistent", + "CoreReader.joint_conflict", + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", + "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" + ], + "dependencies": { + "CoreReader.Duties": [], + "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.Consistent": [], + "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], + "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ + "propext" + ] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "c-10-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-10-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-47-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-54-c1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "rejected", + "reported_status": "failed", + "effective_status": "failed" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "rejected", + "reported_status": "failed", + "effective_status": "failed" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c6", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-130-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "80535ab7d351555636e11c5e2d76e21fe48d3a02f4cc5616e24c5823331abb0d" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "actual_summary_sha256": "bd18087a6abc02e174cf823db3011c5302c3e7dfd371b5d2c33629158fdb0002", + "checker_sha256": { + "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "477e9bd0e87f4abb1748dba017952e1e03794900bbdb3dda3fbfa423990a6fb7", + "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" + }, + "record_note": "Actual final check with machine-specific evidence-directory field omitted; semantic judgments remain reported." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ff22f10 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json @@ -0,0 +1,68 @@ +{ + "checked": [ + "CoreReader.Duties", + "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "CoreReader.Consistent", + "CoreReader.joint_conflict", + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", + "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" + ], + "dependencies": { + "CoreReader.Duties": [], + "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.Consistent": [], + "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], + "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ + "propext" + ] + }, + "errors": [], + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "passed": true, + "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" + }, + "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..121fdc4 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +✔ [2/3] Built CoreReader (219ms) +Build completed successfully (3 jobs). +info: CoreReader: no previous manifest, creating one from scratch +info: toolchain not updated; already up-to-date diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e166155 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@ +CoreReader.Duties (applicable : Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (examined : Nat → Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) + (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop +'CoreReader.Duties' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.mixed_projection (a : Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) + (h : CoreReader.Duties a e c g) (he : a c CoreReader.Aspect.empirical) (hv : a c CoreReader.Aspect.value) : + e c g CoreReader.Aspect.empirical ∧ e c g CoreReader.Aspect.value +'CoreReader.mixed_projection' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List CoreReader.Aspect) (a : Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + CoreReader.Assessed xs a e c g ↔ CoreReader.Assessed ys a e c g +'CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture : CoreReader.Duties CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.bothExamined 7 3 +'CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected : ¬CoreReader.Duties CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.empiricalOnly 7 3 +'CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬CoreReader.Duties CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.bothExamined 7 4 +'CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected' depends on axioms: [propext] +CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬CoreReader.Assessed [] CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.empiricalOnly 7 3 +'CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.Consistent (consequence : List CoreReader.Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List CoreReader.Fact) : Prop +'CoreReader.Consistent' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.joint_conflict : + ¬CoreReader.Consistent CoreReader.fixtureConsequence + [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ, CoreReader.Fact.notQ] +'CoreReader.joint_conflict' depends on axioms: [propext] +CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set : + CoreReader.Consistent CoreReader.fixtureConsequence [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ] +'CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set' depends on axioms: [propext] +CoreReader.distinct_contexts : + CoreReader.Consistent CoreReader.fixtureConsequence [CoreReader.Fact.positiveInOne, CoreReader.Fact.negativeInTwo] +'CoreReader.distinct_contexts' depends on axioms: [propext] +CoreReader.ChangeReported (before after : List CoreReader.Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop +'CoreReader.ChangeReported' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report : + ¬CoreReader.ChangeReported [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ, CoreReader.Fact.notQ] + [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ] true +'CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop +'CoreReader.ObservationComplete' does not depend on any axioms +CoreReader.observation_gap : ¬CoreReader.ObservationComplete [0, 1] +'CoreReader.observation_gap' depends on axioms: [propext] +CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion : ¬CoreReader.ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ∀ (n : Nat), n + 0 = n +'CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion' depends on axioms: [propext] +CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion : ¬CoreReader.ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬∀ (n : Nat), n = 0 +'CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion' depends on axioms: [propext] +CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness : + CoreReader.runOwnAssessment CoreReader.sampleSystem = true ∧ + ¬∀ (n : Nat), CoreReader.sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true +'CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness' depends on axioms: [propext] diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e8070ad --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,941 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "CoreReader.Duties", + "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "CoreReader.Consistent", + "CoreReader.joint_conflict", + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", + "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" + ], + "dependencies": { + "CoreReader.Duties": [], + "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.Consistent": [], + "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], + "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ + "propext" + ] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "c-10-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-10-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-47-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-54-c1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "rejected", + "reported_status": "failed", + "effective_status": "failed" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "rejected", + "reported_status": "failed", + "effective_status": "failed" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c6", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-130-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "cf46c770e449675b6eb0fe65798bec9e84b916af2bcfab3ed22f89dd7ea733b4" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "actual_summary_sha256": "4a2e827b9a6695b8ddd524796e99feccdbf49519abd8bc5098ca0bccf48e5e76", + "checker_sha256": { + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "0e3e2ced77940ece0d2a6bebbb585afce0f0ce14d99cd880215ac7b560e976d1", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" + } +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..574c675 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean @@ -0,0 +1,176 @@ +namespace CoreReader + +inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value + deriving DecidableEq + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect + +def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + Duties applicable examined claim grounds + +def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.mixed_projection +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected + +inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo + deriving DecidableEq + +def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ + (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ + (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ + (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.joint_conflict +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.distinct_contexts +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-61-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.ChangeReported +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.ObservationComplete +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.observation_gap +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +structure SelfAssessingSystem where + ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool + samples : List Nat + +def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := + s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple + +def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := + ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad + +end CoreReader diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c5190a2 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +name = "CoreReader" +version = "0.0.1" +defaultTargets = ["CoreReader"] +[[lean_lib]] +name = "CoreReader" diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a8afa7d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0d312c0 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json @@ -0,0 +1,1429 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "repository_root": "../../..", + "source_current": { + "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" + }, + "baseline_current": { + "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" + }, + "code_files": [ + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader.lean", + "sha256": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" + } + ], + "review": { + "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", + "sha256": "d7f8083591e4e7b27886863a7f468267fa7a14cb35b22167c535ee6e8f370cdb" + }, + "views": { + "overview_en": { + "path": "../../core-overview.md", + "sha256": "4d979ba1a23c31ed706ddc94e0ffc787fd83d4f7dc7ae57e55a95f544dee0924" + }, + "details_en": { + "path": "../../core-details.md", + "sha256": "172259ced6ccd32448585fc488e840d99bd1c66a200300a5a69aaacec0d7ebc3" + }, + "overview_zh": { + "path": "../../../zh/lean/core-overview.md", + "sha256": "74597d5b9ecc8e7c6c458254d9a3c32f829f0a6e0fd72883ebf773b0c5efc1f6" + }, + "details_zh": { + "path": "../../../zh/lean/core-details.md", + "sha256": "f1f06df9e204c07450bb6815fcc2d6125c50b410ddafce63e15cc8f2149b7b42" + } + }, + "entries": [ + { + "id": "c-10-c1", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "c-10-c1", + "excerpt": "This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-10-c2", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "c-10-c2", + "excerpt": "It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c1", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "c-12-c1", + "excerpt": "The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c2", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "c-12-c2", + "excerpt": "The charter and Grounds constrain one another;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c3", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "c-12-c3", + "excerpt": "their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c4", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "c-12-c4", + "excerpt": "Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "unit": "organon.charter", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "c-22-c1", + "excerpt": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "c-22-c2", + "excerpt": "It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "c-24-c1", + "excerpt": "The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "c-24-c2", + "excerpt": "The provisions below specify the conditions for each.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", + "clause": "c-29-c1", + "excerpt": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", + "clause": "c-29-c2", + "excerpt": "It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "c-34-c1", + "excerpt": "A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "c-34-c2", + "excerpt": "A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c3", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "c-34-c3", + "excerpt": "Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "c-39-c1", + "excerpt": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "c-39-c2", + "excerpt": "“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c3", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "c-39-c3", + "excerpt": "These remain within the scope of possible change;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c4", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "c-39-c4", + "excerpt": "their revisability does not guarantee actual progress.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-44-c1", + "excerpt": "Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-44-c2", + "excerpt": "Having the orientation does not guarantee progress.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c3", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-44-c3", + "excerpt": "Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-46-c1", + "excerpt": "“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-46-c2", + "excerpt": "it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-47-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-47-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-48-c1", + "excerpt": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-48-c2", + "excerpt": "Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-49-c1", + "excerpt": "Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "c-49-c2", + "excerpt": "a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-54-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", + "clause": "c-54-c1", + "excerpt": "The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Consistent", + "CoreReader.joint_conflict" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed." + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-59-c1", + "excerpt": "“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-59-c2", + "excerpt": "Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment;", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled." + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c3", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-59-c3", + "excerpt": "old and new principles need not remain compatible forever.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c4", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-59-c4", + "excerpt": "When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal." + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-61-c1", + "excerpt": "“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-61-c2", + "excerpt": "Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean." + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c3", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-61-c3", + "excerpt": "Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "c-66-c1", + "excerpt": "Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "c-66-c2", + "excerpt": "Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "c-67-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "c-67-c2", + "excerpt": "A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-72-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity", + "clause": "c-72-c1", + "excerpt": "A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "clause": "c-77-c1", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "clause": "c-77-c2", + "excerpt": "Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c3", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "clause": "c-77-c3", + "excerpt": "The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "c-82-c1", + "excerpt": "Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "c-82-c2", + "excerpt": "When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c3", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "c-82-c3", + "excerpt": "Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "c-83-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-application does not constitute self-proof.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c2", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "c-83-c2", + "excerpt": "Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself.", + "countermodel": { + "declaration": "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness", + "verification": "passed", + "target": "refuted", + "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", + "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Passing the system's own finite test implies its owned principle is correct at every natural input. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." + } + }, + { + "id": "c-84-c1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "c-84-c1", + "excerpt": "That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "c-89-c1", + "excerpt": "The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "c-89-c2", + "excerpt": "The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "rejected", + "status": "failed", + "reason": "ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c1", + "excerpt": "Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c2", + "excerpt": "Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c3", + "excerpt": "Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "rejected", + "status": "failed", + "reason": "unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c4", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c4", + "excerpt": "Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c5", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c5", + "excerpt": "When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Duties", + "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c6", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c6", + "excerpt": "Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility." + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-98-c1", + "excerpt": "Empirical claim", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-98-c2", + "excerpt": "Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-98-c3", + "excerpt": "Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-99-c1", + "excerpt": "Inferential claim", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-99-c2", + "excerpt": "Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-99-c3", + "excerpt": "Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-100-c1", + "excerpt": "Value commitment", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-100-c2", + "excerpt": "State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-100-c3", + "excerpt": "Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-102-c1", + "excerpt": "Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-102-c2", + "excerpt": "they need not prove all their own starting assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-102-c3", + "excerpt": "The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c4", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-102-c4", + "excerpt": "Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-107-c1", + "excerpt": "Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-107-c2", + "excerpt": "A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-107-c3", + "excerpt": "A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-109-c1", + "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-109-c2", + "excerpt": "Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-109-c3", + "excerpt": "Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c4", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-109-c4", + "excerpt": "Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-111-c1", + "excerpt": "An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "c-111-c2", + "excerpt": "The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-116-c1", + "excerpt": "Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-116-c2", + "excerpt": "The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-116-c3", + "excerpt": "Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-118-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-118-c2", + "excerpt": "Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-118-c3", + "excerpt": "Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c4", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-118-c4", + "excerpt": "it does not automatically establish understanding of that process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c5", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "c-118-c5", + "excerpt": "Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "c-123-c1", + "excerpt": "The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "c-123-c2", + "excerpt": "Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "c-125-c1", + "excerpt": "This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "c-125-c2", + "excerpt": "Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "c-125-c3", + "excerpt": "Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-130-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "c-130-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "c-131-c1", + "excerpt": "A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "c-131-c2", + "excerpt": "They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "c-132-c1", + "excerpt": "Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "c-132-c2", + "excerpt": "Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "c-133-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "c-133-c2", + "excerpt": "Relevant reasons may still give it priority.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "unit": "organon.relationships", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-141-c1", + "excerpt": "The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c2", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-141-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c3", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-141-c3", + "excerpt": "Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c4", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-141-c4", + "excerpt": "Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c5", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-141-c5", + "excerpt": "Each commitment needs its own reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-143-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c2", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-143-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c3", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-143-c3", + "excerpt": "A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c4", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-143-c4", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c5", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-143-c5", + "excerpt": "Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-145-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c2", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-145-c2", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c3", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-145-c3", + "excerpt": "The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c4", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-145-c4", + "excerpt": "The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c5", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "c-145-c5", + "excerpt": "Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "c-152-c1", + "excerpt": "Existing form", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c2", + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "c-152-c2", + "excerpt": "The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "c-153-c1", + "excerpt": "Assessment", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c2", + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "c-153-c2", + "excerpt": "Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c3", + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "c-153-c3", + "excerpt": "not limited to executable tests.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b4878d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,900 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `ba7456d7a43ecc0a49398111904a9e5d75f421393ee4bc179da37850c80c9759`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Initial blind explanation of two Lean readers (English) + +Frozen initial artifact, prepared from code only with `organon-lean-natural-language --explain-lines`. Source fidelity is unevaluated. Mapping comments were treated solely as identifiers. + +## Input boundary and checked environment + +The translator received these two encodings, the task, the natural-language skill, and their lean-toolchain/lakefile.toml files. Automatic context also exposed repository AGENTS workflow instructions, project paths, a skills catalog, and parent status messages saying a later revision might be needed. It did not expose PHILOSOPHY text, rationale source text, source snapshots, run.json, source-first assessments, prior iteration records, or author correspondence explanations. Those were not retrieved. The AGENTS request to read philosophical source was intentionally not followed for this explicitly code-only task. A parent notice of later possible revision arrived after the semantic line explanations had been drafted; no changed input was read. + +Installed Lean reported: `Lean (version 4.33.1, arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0, commit 819816b2e0a3bf405af45ae5c7af2491d8f5bee6, Release)`. Both projects declare `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1`, one lean_lib apiece, and no package dependencies. The files contain no explicit imports, so Lean supplies its standard Init environment. For each file an exact source copy followed only by `#print axioms` for every declared top-level definition, type, structure, and theorem was checked with this version; both exited 0. Original code was not edited. Audit copies and logs are beside this document. This was actual elaboration/kernel checking plus an axiom audit, not a philosophical or source-fidelity check. + +Input SHA-256 values: + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b` + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6` + + + +## Shared semantic conventions + +All explicitly named parameters are universally quantified when a declaration is used generally. Unannotated binders have types inferred from use: aspect is Aspect, and context/n are Nat in these files. No declarations introduce user axioms, sorry, typeclass premises, extra imported theories, abstract support relations with hidden interpretations, or implicit philosophical assumptions. Core decidability instances support concrete equality, order, conjunction, negation, and membership computations. Generated instances are not premises supplied by a domain user. Constructors preceded by a dot use their expected inductive type. + +`Prop` is the type of propositions. `A → B` assumes a proof of A to produce B; `¬ A` means A → False. `∧` needs both proofs, `∨` needs one chosen branch, and `↔` needs implication both ways. `∀` quantifies over its full inferred domain; `∀ n ∈ xs, P n` abbreviates a universal implication from membership. Equality is Lean equality; a Boolean polarity is data, not itself truth or falsity of an external claim. Lists are finite ordered collections with possible repetitions. Field projections `.1`/`.2` extract conjunction components in the displayed proof terms. `rfl` proves definitional equality; `Iff.rfl` proves reflexive equivalence; `decide` computes a decidable proposition. `simp` unfolds the named definitions and applies available simplification lemmas. `intro` takes an arbitrary quantified input or an implication premise; `cases` eliminates constructors, including impossible equalities. No computational success validates an interpretation of the declared names. + +## Code-derived claims + +### CoreReader: Applicability and ignored labels + +Duties is an obligation predicate: for each of the three Aspect values, applicability to the selected natural-number claim implies examination at exactly the selected claim and grounds identifiers. Both supplied predicates are arbitrary. Assessed is just Duties with an unused list parameter. mixed_projection assumes Duties and applicability of empirical and value, then obtains the two examination facts by implication elimination; it does not establish the assumed obligation. labels_do_not_waive is reflexive equivalence of definitionally identical expressions. The definitions force label independence. Neither theorem shows that a supplied applicability or examination predicate faithfully represents an external assessment. No aspect applicable means Duties holds vacuously, and an always-true examination predicate makes it hold for any applicability predicate. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:3` (lines 3–24). + +```lean + +inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value + deriving DecidableEq + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect + +def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + Duties applicable examined claim grounds + +def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:29` (lines 29–31). + +```lean + +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:36` (lines 36–38). + +```lean + +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl + +``` + +### CoreReader: Three fixed predicate fixtures + +mixedClaim applies only to claim 7 and the empirical and value constructors. bothExamined holds only at claim 7 and grounds 3 for those same two constructors; empiricalOnly permits just empirical. complete_mixed_fixture constructs the required conjunctions at 7 and 3. empirical_only_rejected assumes Duties and obtains the impossible equality value = empirical. unrelated_grounds_rejected obtains 4 = 3 from the hard-coded grounds field. omitted_labels_still_rejected is exactly empirical_only_rejected after unfolding Assessed with an empty label list. These are constructive examples over chosen numeral identifiers. The numeral mismatch has no independently defined semantic relevance relation, and the code supplies no general procedure for finding applicable aspects or adequate grounds. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:43` (lines 43–45). + +```lean + +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:50` (lines 50–53). + +```lean + +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:58` (lines 58–61). + +```lean + +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:66` (lines 66–67). + +```lean + +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected + +``` + +### CoreReader: A finite token relation and same-context exclusion + +Fact is a five-token enumeration, with no formula syntax or valuation. In particular, pImpliesQ is not an implication and notQ is not negation. fixtureConsequence is a hand-written relation: at context 0, true requires membership of both p and pImpliesQ, while false requires notQ; context 1 has only the positiveInOne true branch; context 2 has only the negativeInTwo false branch. All other contexts fail. Consistent permits any supplied relation and means that true and false never both hold for one common context and the same token list. joint_conflict exhibits both at context 0 for the three-token list. withdrawn_current_set rules out all false branches of the shorter two-token list. distinct_contexts shows that the two singleton-style branches force an impossible common context 1 = 2. These theorems check this finite relation, not deductive closure of a general logic. Lists record no acquisition, withdrawal event, temporal history, or reasons for withdrawing a token. With an always-false consequence relation every held list is Consistent; with a relation true for both polarities at one context none is. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:69` (lines 69–82). + +```lean + +inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo + deriving DecidableEq + +def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ + (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ + (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ + (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:87` (lines 87–89). + +```lean + +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:94` (lines 94–96). + +```lean + +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:101` (lines 101–106). + +```lean + +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible + +``` + +### CoreReader: A Boolean condition on unequal lists + +ChangeReported before after claimsUnchanged means before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false. The concrete theorem rejects passing true for the two specified unequal lists by decidable computation. Lists, despite names containing set, are ordered and retain multiplicity: reordering or adding a duplicate can count as change here. Equal lists satisfy the implication vacuously even if the Boolean is true; a false Boolean always satisfies it. This is a Boolean admissibility condition and supplies no report contents, recipient, disclosure event, or evidence that anyone reports anything. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:111` (lines 111–112). + +```lean + +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:117` (lines 117–120). + +```lean + +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide + +``` + +### CoreReader: A missing natural number alongside independently true and false claims + +ObservationComplete observed requires every natural number to belong to a finite list. observation_gap refutes completeness of [0, 1] using 2. The code proves this one list's gap; in standard finite-list semantics no finite list contains all natural numbers, but that general statement is not a theorem in this file. gap_with_true_conclusion pairs the gap with ∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n, proved by reduction and reflexivity. gap_with_false_conclusion pairs it with ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0), refuted at 1. These are conjunctions with independent arithmetic results. They show this fixed membership gap coexists with a true selected universal statement and the falsity of another selected universal statement. No support relation connects the list to either statement; no observation reliability, induction rule, or general theory of evidential support is defined. The quantifier is over all Nat, not all members of the observed list. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:125` (lines 125–125). + +```lean + +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:130` (lines 130–133). + +```lean + +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:138` (lines 138–140). + +```lean + +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:145` (lines 145–150). + +```lean + +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad + +``` + +### CoreReader: A singleton passes an equation which fails universally + +proposedPrinciple is n + 1 = 2 * n over Nat; selfAssessmentSamples is [1]. The theorem proves every list member satisfies the equation, by reducing membership to n = 1 and computing. It refutes universal satisfaction by evaluating the assumed equation at 0, where 1 = 0 would follow. All variables here are natural numbers; the bounded syntax ∀ n ∈ samples expands to ∀ n, n ∈ samples → equation n. This is a finite-sample arithmetic counterexample. No self-assessment process, evaluator, philosophy object, or correctness relation is modeled; the declaration names do not add one. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–154). + +```lean + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +def selfAssessmentSamples : List Nat := [1] + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:159` (lines 159–169). + +```lean + +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + (∀ n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples, proposedPrinciple n) ∧ ¬ (∀ n, proposedPrinciple n) := by + constructor + · intro n hn + simp [selfAssessmentSamples] at hn + subst n + unfold proposedPrinciple + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [proposedPrinciple] at bad + +``` + +### RationaleReader: Record projections, fixed updates, and separate latency data + +ServiceState is a pair of arbitrary natural numbers. direct and cachedRead are pure field projections. updateOnly replaces acknowledged and preserves cached; updateInvalidating ignores its old state and constructs (n, n). initial is (10, 10). LatencyContext is a separate triple; originalLatency is (5, 2, 6) and stricterLatency is (5, 2, 3), in direct/cache/budget order. withinBudget means both latency fields are at most budget. original_comparison computes agreement at initial and the inequalities 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6. There are no constraints relating a state's values or update functions to the latency records. These numbers are constants, with no units, measured workloads, I/O, concurrent execution, or latency distribution. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:3` (lines 3–28). + +```lean + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def updateInvalidating (_s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := ⟨n, n⟩ + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:33` (lines 33–35). + +```lean + +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: A stale projection for one update and a false universal equality + +update_read_counterexample proves initial agreement at 10 and disagreement after updateOnly initial 11, whose fields are (11, 10). cached_freshness_refuted disproves ∀ n : Nat, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n by n = 11; the cached field remains 10. Thus the supplied universal equality fails in the explicitly constructed pure model. This is not a proof about all cache implementations, or a measured service failure. Neither theorem states a general implication from initial agreement to all subsequent agreement; the fixture instead supplies a concrete before/after contrast. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:41` (lines 41–43). + +```lean + +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:48` (lines 48–51). + +```lean + +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +``` + +### RationaleReader: Equal fields written directly; unchanged writes + +invalidation_restores_fixture computes that updateInvalidating initial 11 has both projections equal to 11, because the definition returns (11, 11). It models writing both values directly, not deletion of a cache entry or a protocol that later reloads one. unchanged_update_retained computes agreement after updateOnly initial 10, which preserves (10, 10). These theorems have no external premises and prove their particular numerical examples; neither claims a general temporal safety or invalidation theorem. The broader all-n equality for updateInvalidating follows from its definition, but is not the stated fixture theorem. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:56` (lines 56–57). + +```lean + +theorem invalidation_restores_fixture : + direct (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 ∧ cachedRead (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:62` (lines 62–63). + +```lean + +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: A budget-only change + +budget_change_is_distinct proves withinBudget (5, 2, 6) and not withinBudget (5, 2, 3). Both fixed latency numbers stay the same; the direct value 5 exceeds the smaller budget 3 although cache value 2 remains within it. The proof unfolds the predicate and computes. There is no causal claim that the service changed, no universal performance result, and no theorem connecting this budget condition to the separate cached-value disagreement. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:68` (lines 68–71). + +```lean + +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: An identity proof with a supplied proposition + +namedUniversalTruth explicitly quantifies over a proposition P and its assumed proof h : P, then returns exactly h. Its content is ∀ P : Prop, P → P. There are no hidden typeclass assumptions and no proof that an arbitrary proposition is true without h. In particular, the name does not create universal truth, philosophical correctness, or correspondence to any prose statement. This is the identity function on proofs. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:76` (lines 76–76). + +```lean + +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +``` + +### RationaleReader: One specific inequality and a different false generalization + +encoded_statement computes the single true inequality (0 : Nat) ≤ 1. different_statement_refuted refutes ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 at 2; case analysis of Nat's inductive ≤ proof reduces the impossible 2 ≤ 1 to an impossible 2 ≤ 0 case. proof_of_different_claim pairs the earlier results. It does not obtain the universal claim from the specific one. This proves a precise true/false contrast between two arithmetic statements, without a semantic encoding function or general theorem about the fidelity of formalization. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:81` (lines 81–81). + +```lean + +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:86` (lines 86–90). + +```lean + +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:95` (lines 95–97). + +```lean + +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +``` + +## Actual dependency audit + +The following checked declarations depend on Lean core `propext` (propositional extensionality, allowing equivalent propositions to be identified): `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected`, `CoreReader.joint_conflict`, `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set`, `CoreReader.distinct_contexts`, `CoreReader.observation_gap`, `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion`, `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion`, `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness`, `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted`, `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted`, and `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim`. Every other top-level declaration audited in the two files reported no axioms. The complete declaration-by-declaration output is in `CoreReader.audit.log` and `RationaleReader.audit.log`; these statements refer to the checked proof terms, including any dependency introduced by tactic-generated proofs. No claim is made that a listed axiom is required by every possible proof of the proposition. + +## Appendix: every nonblank source line + +Each numbered entry explains its actual line. Exact code is preserved in the excerpts above and the audit copies. Mapping comments supply metadata only. The machine-readable equivalent is `line-explanations.json`. + +### CoreReader.lean + +Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`; SHA-256 `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`. + +- L1: Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. + +- L3: Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. + +- L4: Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. + +- L6: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L7: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L8: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L9: Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + +- L10: Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. + +- L11: Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. + +- L13: Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. + +- L14: Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. + +- L15: Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. + +- L17: Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + +- L18: It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. + +- L20: Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + +- L21: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. + +- L23: Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + +- L24: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. + +- L26: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L27: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L28: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L29: Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. + +- L30: Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. + +- L31: Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. + +- L33: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L34: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L35: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L36: Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. + +- L37: Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. + +- L38: Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. + +- L40: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L41: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L42: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L43: State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. + +- L44: Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. + +- L45: Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. + +- L47: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L48: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L49: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L50: State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. + +- L51: Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. + +- L52: Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. + +- L53: Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. + +- L55: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L56: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L57: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L58: State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. + +- L59: Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. + +- L60: Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. + +- L61: Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. + +- L63: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L64: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L65: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L66: State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. + +- L67: Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. + +- L69: Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. + +- L70: Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. + +- L72: Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. + +- L73: The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. + +- L74: The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. + +- L75: A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. + +- L76: The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. + +- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L81: Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. + +- L82: Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. + +- L84: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L85: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L86: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L87: State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. + +- L88: Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. + +- L89: Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. + +- L91: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L92: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L93: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L94: State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. + +- L95: For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. + +- L96: Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. + +- L98: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L99: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L100: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L101: State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. + +- L102: Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. + +- L103: Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. + +- L104: Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. + +- L105: Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. + +- L106: Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. + +- L108: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L109: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L110: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L111: Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. + +- L112: Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. + +- L114: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L115: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L116: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L117: Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. + +- L118: State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. + +- L119: Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. + +- L120: Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. + +- L122: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L123: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L124: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L125: Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. + +- L127: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L128: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L129: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L130: State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. + +- L131: Assume completeness for contradiction. + +- L132: Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. + +- L133: Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. + +- L135: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L136: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L137: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L138: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. + +- L139: State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. + +- L140: Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. + +- L142: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L143: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L144: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L145: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. + +- L146: State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. + +- L147: Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. + +- L148: Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. + +- L149: Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. + +- L150: Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. + +- L152: Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. + +- L154: Define selfAssessmentSamples as the singleton natural-number list [1]. No assessment algorithm is encoded. + +- L156: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L157: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L158: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L159: Begin a theorem contrasting the fixed sample list with universal arithmetic validity. + +- L160: State that every member of [1] satisfies n + 1 = 2 * n, and that this equation does not hold for every natural number. The bounded quantifier expands to ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n. + +- L161: Split the conjunction into its sampled and universal-negation proof obligations. + +- L162: For the first obligation, introduce an arbitrary natural number n and its assumed sample-list membership hn. + +- L163: Unfold the singleton list and simplify membership, obtaining n = 1. + +- L164: Substitute 1 for n in the goal. + +- L165: Unfold proposedPrinciple to the arithmetic equation at 1. + +- L166: Prove the concrete equality 1 + 1 = 2 * 1 by decidable computation. + +- L167: For the second obligation, assume the equation holds at every natural number. + +- L168: Specialize the assumption to 0. + +- L169: Unfold and simplify the equation at 0, yielding the contradiction 1 = 0. + +- L171: Close the CoreReader namespace. + +### RationaleReader.lean + +Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`; SHA-256 `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`. + +- L1: Open the RationaleReader namespace. + +- L3: Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. + +- L4: Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. + +- L5: Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. + +- L6: Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. + +- L8: Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. + +- L10: Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. + +- L12: Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. + +- L14: Define updateInvalidating to ignore its old state entirely and return the pair (n, n). Despite its name, it directly writes both fields; it has no invalid marker, eviction, fetch, or invalidation protocol. + +- L16: Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. + +- L18: Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. + +- L19: Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. + +- L20: Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. + +- L21: Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. + +- L23: Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. + +- L25: Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. + +- L27: Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. + +- L28: Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. + +- L30: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L31: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L32: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L33: State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. + +- L34: Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. + +- L35: Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). + +- L37: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L38: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L39: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L40: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L41: Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. + +- L42: The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. + +- L43: The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. + +- L45: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L46: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L47: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L48: State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. + +- L49: Assume this universal equality for contradiction. + +- L50: Specialize it to 11. + +- L51: Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. + +- L53: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L54: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L55: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L56: Begin a concrete conjunction theorem about updateInvalidating initial 11. + +- L57: Prove by computation that both fields of the returned state are 11. This follows from construction of (11, 11), not a modeled cache invalidation process. + +- L59: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L60: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L61: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L62: Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. + +- L63: Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. + +- L65: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L66: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L67: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L68: Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. + +- L69: State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. + +- L70: Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. + +- L71: Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. + +- L73: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L74: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L75: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L76: For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. + +- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L81: Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. + +- L83: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L84: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L85: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L86: State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. + +- L87: Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. + +- L88: Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. + +- L89: Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. + +- L90: In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. + +- L92: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L93: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L94: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L95: Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. + +- L96: State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. + +- L97: Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. + +- L99: Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2eceb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md @@ -0,0 +1,477 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `2604d478b8cc776bd766a67a2edd4b27cd99f8b6c781d3f564fc751b0ae98425`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 两份 Lean 读者编码的初始盲解释（中文译稿） + +本稿翻译已经冻结的英文代码解释，没有读取来源原文或更新后的编码。英文初稿 initial.en.md 及其 SHA-256 保持不变；本稿不评估来源忠实性。 + +## 代码含义概览 + +CoreReader 的 Duties 是条件义务：对三个 Aspect 中的每个方面，若任意 supplied applicable 谓词判为适用，则同一主张及依据对应的 examined 关系必须成立。Assessed 完全忽略标签列表，因此标签不影响结果是定义直接决定的。具体示例用编号 7、3 及固定方面建立成立或不成立；编号 4 被拒绝来自 4 ≠ 3，不来自另外定义的相关性关系。 + +Fact 是五种标记，不含命题公式或逻辑赋值。fixtureConsequence 只有手写的三个语境分支；Consistent 排除同一语境中同一列表的两种布尔极性同时成立。具体定理证明该有限关系上的冲突、删除 notQ 后无负极性分支，以及不同语境不能成为同一语境；没有一般逻辑的演绎闭包或实际撤回过程。 + +ChangeReported 仅要求列表不等时布尔参数为 false，不含报告内容或行为。列表有序且允许重复；相同列表令蕴含空真。ObservationComplete 要求有限列表包含所有自然数；[0, 1] 在 2 处失败。其余两个定理将这项缺口分别与独立的算术真命题和假全称命题的否定组成合取，没有定义列表对结论的支持关系。 + +初始 selfAssessmentSamples 是 [1]，proposedPrinciple 是 n + 1 = 2 * n。证明在唯一样本 1 处成立，在 0 处失败；初始编码没有自评算法、评估者或哲学对象。 + +RationaleReader 的 ServiceState 只是两个自然数字段；direct 和 cachedRead 是纯投影，updateOnly 只写 acknowledged，初始 updateInvalidating 直接返回 (n, n)。这些是纯函数，没有 I/O、并发、失效标志或重新加载协议。具体例子证明 (10, 10) 初始一致，单字段改为 11 后成为 (11, 10)，两个字段直接写为 11 后一致，以及写回原值 10 后一致。 + +延迟记录独立于状态和更新函数。两个延迟恒为 5、2，预算从 6 改为 3 后，直接延迟不再达标；没有单位、测量或因果关系。namedUniversalTruth 对任意 P 和显式 h : P 直接返回 h，内容仅为 P → P。最后三个定理证明 0 ≤ 1，同时用 2 反驳所有自然数均 ≤ 1；没有语义编码函数或一般形式化忠实性定理。 + +## 检查及依赖 + +原始两个文件的逐字副本附加每个顶层声明的 #print axioms 后，均在 Lean 4.33.1 实际检查成功。部分证明依赖 Lean core 的 propext，其余已审计顶层声明无公理依赖。确切逐声明输出见同目录 CoreReader.audit.log、RationaleReader.audit.log；英文稿列出全部 propext 声明。检查仅证明这些形式命题的内核有效性，不证明哲学正确性或来源忠实性。 + +## 全部非空行解释 + +### CoreReader.lean + +路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`。 + +- L1：打开 CoreReader 命名空间；后续声明名带此前缀。 + +- L3：声明 Aspect 类型，恰有 empirical、inferential、value 三个互异的无参数构造子；名称本身没有定义领域含义。 + +- L4：生成 DecidableEq 实例，使任意两个 Aspect 值的相等性可计算判定。 + +- L6：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L7：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L8：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L9：开始定义命题 Duties，接收以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的任意适用性谓词 applicable。 + +- L10：再接收关于主张编号、依据编号和 Aspect 的任意三元谓词 examined，以及显式自然数参数 claim、grounds；未假设这些谓词具备任何性质。 + +- L11：Duties 表示：对每个 Aspect，若它适用于当前主张，则 examined 对同一主张、同一依据及该 Aspect 成立。没有任何适用方面时，此条件空真。 + +- L13：开始定义 Assessed，显式接收 Aspect 标签列表和任意适用性谓词；以下划线开头的标签参数未被使用。 + +- L14：接收 examined 谓词以及自然数主张、依据编号；返回命题。 + +- L15：将 Assessed 定义为这些谓词和编号对应的 Duties；标签既不限制也不加强该命题。 + +- L17：定义以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的 mixedClaim。 + +- L18：它恰在主张编号为 7 且方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；inferential 从不满足。 + +- L20：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 bothExamined。 + +- L21：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；合取向右嵌套。 + +- L23：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 empiricalOnly。 + +- L24：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 时成立；没有 value 或 inferential 分支。 + +- L26：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L27：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L28：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L29：开始一个对任意适用性谓词 a 和 examined 谓词 e 全称参数化的定理。 + +- L30：显式接收自然数 c、g，Duties a e c g 的假定证明 h，以及 empirical 和 value 适用于 c 的假定证明。 + +- L31：结论是在同一 c、g 上的两个 e 事实同时成立；分别把 h 用于 he、hv，再组成合取。下划线是推断出的 Aspect 实参；没有脱离这些前提建立任何 examination 事实。 + +- L33：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L34：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L35：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L36：开始一个关于任意两个标签列表 xs、ys 以及任意适用性谓词 a 的定理。 + +- L37：还量化 examined 谓词以及主张、依据编号。 + +- L38：用 Iff.rfl 证明两个 Assessed 命题等价：标签被忽略，两者都归约为同一 Duties 命题。这是定义恒等，不是关于标签的经验发现。 + +- L40：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L41：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L42：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L43：陈述具体谓词 mixedClaim、bothExamined 在主张 7、依据 3 处满足 Duties，并开始 tactic 证明。 + +- L44：引入任意方面 k 及 mixedClaim 7 k 的证明 hk。 + +- L45：构造 bothExamined 7 3 k：复用 hk 中的 7 = 7，用自反性证明 3 = 3，再复用 hk 中的方面析取。 + +- L47：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L48：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L49：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L50：陈述具体关系 empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处不满足 mixedClaim 的 Duties。 + +- L51：假设所否定的 Duties 命题，目标为推出 False。 + +- L52：把该假设用于 value；用 7 = 7 和右侧析取 value = value 建立适用性，得到 hv : empiricalOnly 7 3 value。 + +- L53：取出 hv 最内层的等式 value = empirical，利用两个 Aspect 构造子互异将其消去。 + +- L55：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L56：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L57：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L58：陈述在依据编号 4 而非 bothExamined 固定的 3 处，Duties 不成立。 + +- L59：为推出矛盾，假设主张 7、依据 4 处成立 Duties。 + +- L60：将其用于适用的 value 方面，得到 bothExamined 7 4 value。 + +- L61：消去得到的等式 4 = 3，即 hv.2.1。矛盾来自数值不等，而非单独定义的相关性概念。 + +- L63：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L64：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L65：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L66：陈述空标签列表无法使 mixedClaim、empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处的 Assessed 成立。 + +- L67：直接复用 empirical_only_rejected；展开 Assessed 后恰为此前定理否定的命题。 + +- L69：声明具有五个互异无参数构造子的 Fact 类型；pImpliesQ 是标记而非 Lean 蕴含，notQ 是标记而非逻辑否定。 + +- L70：生成 Fact 的可判定相等性，使具体列表成员关系可计算判定。 + +- L72：定义有限 Fact 标记列表、自然数语境和布尔极性之间的关系；列表不必无重复。 + +- L73：第一个语境 0 分支要求极性为 true 且 p、pImpliesQ 都属于列表，或者采用下一行的备选条件。 + +- L74：语境 0 的另一条件要求极性为 false 且 notQ 属于列表；此处结束语境 0 分支。 + +- L75：独立分支要求语境为 1、极性为 true 且 positiveInOne 属于列表。 + +- L76：最后一个分支要求语境为 2、极性为 false 且 negativeInTwo 属于列表；没有其他分支或推理规则。 + +- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L81：以所示类型的任意 consequence 关系及有限 Fact 标记列表定义 Consistent。 + +- L82：要求每个自然数语境中，同一列表的 true 和 false 两种极性不能同时满足该关系；未限制所传关系必须对应逻辑蕴涵。 + +- L84：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L85：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L86：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L87：陈述列表 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 在具体 fixtureConsequence 下不满足 Consistent。 + +- L88：为推出矛盾，假设该列表满足一致性条件。 + +- L89：将一致性条件用于语境 0，提供两种极性的证明；它们分别通过简化显式关系和具体列表成员关系得到。 + +- L91：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L92：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L93：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L94：陈述较短列表 [p, pImpliesQ] 在 fixtureConsequence 下满足一致性条件。 + +- L95：对任意语境，假设两种极性同时成立，目标为 False。 + +- L96：简化 false 极性的假设 h.2；列表中既没有 notQ 也没有 negativeInTwo，因此所有 false 分支都不可能。 + +- L98：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L99：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L100：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L101：陈述 [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] 在示例关系下满足一致性条件。 + +- L102：引入同一个语境，并假设两种极性都在其中成立。 + +- L103：简化 true 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 1。 + +- L104：简化 false 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 2。 + +- L105：把第一个等式反向后与第二个复合，得到不可能的自然数等式 1 = 2。 + +- L106：消去不可能的等式，完成矛盾证明。 + +- L108：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L109：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L110：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L111：以两个列表和名为 claimsUnchanged 的布尔值定义 ChangeReported；这些都是显式输入，没有时间、说话者或报告对象。 + +- L112：要求列表不等蕴含 claimsUnchanged = false；列表相等时条件空真。列表相等区分顺序和重复次数；false 不提供任何报告内容。 + +- L114：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L115：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L116：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L117：开始如下关于 ChangeReported 的具体否定定理。 + +- L118：陈述从 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 改为 [p, pImpliesQ] 且传入 true 时不满足 ChangeReported。 + +- L119：将 ChangeReported 展开为从列表不等到布尔等式的蕴含。 + +- L120：计算判定这个具体命题：列表不同，但 true 不等于 false。 + +- L122：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L123：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L124：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L125：定义 ObservationComplete observed 为每个自然数都属于有限列表 observed；未标注类型的 n 由成员关系推断为 Nat。没有建模观察过程。 + +- L127：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L128：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L129：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L130：陈述列表 [0, 1] 不包含全部自然数。 + +- L131：为推出矛盾，假设其完备。 + +- L132：把全称成员假设用于 2，得到 2 ∈ [0, 1]。 + +- L133：将这个不可能的具体成员关系简化为 False。 + +- L135：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L136：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L137：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L138：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个算术真命题。 + +- L139：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不满足 ObservationComplete，以及每个自然数满足 n + 0 = n。 + +- L140：用 observation_gap 和对每个自然数给出自反性证明的函数构造合取；Nat 加法把 n + 0 归约为 n。算术证明独立于列表。 + +- L142：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L143：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L144：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L145：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个错误全称等式。 + +- L146：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不完备，以及“每个自然数都等于 0”为假。 + +- L147：把 observation_gap 用作第一个合取项，留下被否定全称命题的证明目标。 + +- L148：假设所有自然数都等于 0，目标为 False。 + +- L149：将假设用于 1，得到 1 = 0。 + +- L150：消去不可能的数值等式。 + +- L152：将 proposedPrinciple n 定义为自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n；名称没有赋予其哲学或规范地位。 + +- L154：将 selfAssessmentSamples 定义为单元素自然数列表 [1]；没有编码评估算法。 + +- L156：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L157：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L158：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L159：开始一个比较固定样本列表与算术全称有效性的定理。 + +- L160：陈述 [1] 中每个元素满足 n + 1 = 2 * n，而非每个自然数都满足它。受限量词展开为 ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n。 + +- L161：将合取拆为样本成立和否定全称成立两个证明目标。 + +- L162：对第一个目标，引入任意自然数 n 及其属于样本列表的假设 hn。 + +- L163：展开单元素列表并简化成员关系，得到 n = 1。 + +- L164：在目标中用 1 替换 n。 + +- L165：展开 proposedPrinciple，得到 1 处的算术等式。 + +- L166：通过可判定计算证明具体等式 1 + 1 = 2 * 1。 + +- L167：对第二个目标，假设该等式在每个自然数处都成立。 + +- L168：将假设用于 0。 + +- L169：展开并简化 0 处的等式，得到矛盾 1 = 0。 + +- L171：关闭 CoreReader 命名空间。 + +### RationaleReader.lean + +路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`。 + +- L1：打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 + +- L3：声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 + +- L4：声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 + +- L5：声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 + +- L6：通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 + +- L8：将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + +- L10：将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + +- L12：将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 + +- L14：将 updateInvalidating 定义为完全忽略旧状态并返回 (n, n)；尽管名称如此，它直接写入两个字段，没有无效标志、逐出、读取或失效协议。 + +- L16：将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 + +- L18：声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 + +- L19：声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 + +- L20：声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 + +- L21：声明 budget，取任意自然数。 + +- L23：将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 + +- L25：将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 + +- L27：开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 + +- L28：使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 + +- L30：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L31：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L32：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L33：陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 + +- L34：将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 + +- L35：通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 + +- L37：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L38：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L39：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L40：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L41：开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 + +- L42：第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 + +- L43：第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 + +- L45：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L46：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L47：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L48：陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 + +- L49：为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 + +- L50：将其用于 11。 + +- L51：展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 + +- L53：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L54：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L55：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L56：开始一个关于 updateInvalidating initial 11 的具体合取定理。 + +- L57：通过计算证明返回状态的两个字段均为 11；这来自构造 (11, 11)，而非已建模的缓存失效过程。 + +- L59：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L60：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L61：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L62：开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 + +- L63：计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 + +- L65：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L66：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L67：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L68：开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 + +- L69：陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 + +- L70：将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 + +- L71：计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 + +- L73：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L74：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L75：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L76：对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 + +- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L81：通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 + +- L83：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L84：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L85：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L86：陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 + +- L87：为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 + +- L88：将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 + +- L89：利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 + +- L90：在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 + +- L92：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L93：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L94：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L95：开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 + +- L96：同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 + +- L97：复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 + +- L99：关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dcc68e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `bd4eb98a1b1369a610195329d9f33f2162c693aa31def3b28ec03d37874a0e17`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Informed code update: Round 2 (English) + +## Status and input boundary + +This is an informed incremental code explanation, not a fresh blind assessment. The original English explanation and line JSON were frozen before this update, and the original Chinese explanation and line JSON were completed without reading revised code. The initiating agent then disclosed the changed declaration locations and requested this update. That message mentioned a new stored-principle/sample computation and revised state-list comparison; it supplied no source prose or source correspondence judgment. The translator has now inspected the revised encoding, while still not reading PHILOSOPHY, rationale source prose, source snapshots, run.json, source-first judgments, author mapping interpretations, or prior records. Original blind artifacts remain unchanged. Source fidelity remains unevaluated. + +Current input hashes: + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803` + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7` + +## CoreReader: an actual finite Boolean assessment + +At lines 154–162, SelfAssessingSystem stores ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool and samples : List Nat. runOwnAssessment applies List.all to the samples with the function from that same record. This gives an explicit identity link: the function assessed on the finite samples is the very field later quantified over in the theorem. List.all evaluates to true on [] and evaluates p head && all tail p on a nonempty list. It therefore checks all listed inputs, without checking any unlisted input. The fields impose no sample-selection, nonemptiness, coverage, or correctness invariant. The word own is a field name; the code establishes that the function is stored in this record, but has no provenance or ownership relation. + +sampleSystem stores the Boolean function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n and the sample list [1]. The old proposedPrinciple definition at line 152 remains, but the function literally repeats its arithmetic expression rather than referring to that definition. The sample function is computational, using the inferred Decidable instance for natural-number equality. This library instance supplies an equality decision procedure, not an extra domain premise supplied by a caller. + +At lines 167–174, self_assessment_not_correctness proves runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true and ¬ (∀ n : Nat, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true). The first part unfolds the actual computation and decides the equation at 1. The second assumes true at every input, instantiates at 0, and simplifies the false arithmetic equation to the impossible Boolean equality false = true. Thus this one system passes its actual finite sample check while its own stored function fails at an untested input. This now includes an assessment computation that the initial encoding lacked. It remains a numerical example of finite testing; it does not encode assessment of an evaluator, recursive philosophical self-application, correctness of a philosophy, or fulfillment of an external responsibility. Passing the supplied finite test does not become a premise proving all-input validity. + +Exact revised encoding: + +`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–174) + +```lean + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +structure SelfAssessingSystem where + ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool + samples : List Nat + +def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := + s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple + +def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := + ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad + +``` + +## RationaleReader: retaining one input while adding a revealing input + +The initial updateInvalidating definition and invalidation_restores_fixture theorem have been removed. Their old explanation describes only the frozen initial input; no current theorem models direct writes to both fields as a repair. + +At lines 91–96, originalStates is [initial] and revisedStates is [initial, updateOnly initial 11]. These are explicit lists of pure records: initial has (acknowledged, cached) = (10, 10), and the additional record has (11, 10). The original record is retained as the identical first list element. compareReads maps each input to the pair (direct state, cachedRead state); List.map preserves order and length. Despite its name, the function collects observations into pairs and does not itself test the two values for equality or produce an equivalence verdict. + +At lines 101–103, revised_method_retains_case proves the exact output lists [(10, 10)] and [(10, 10), (11, 10)] by decidable computation. This demonstrates for these two fixed input lists that expanding the selected cases retains the earlier equal pair and adds a differing pair. It does not repair the state transformation, establish cache freshness, prove a universal theorem about all method revisions, or model all possible update/read interleavings. The output lists provide concrete observable artifacts; they are not execution histories with timing or independent support for the chosen domain interpretation. + +Exact revised encoding: + +`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:91` (lines 91–103) + +```lean + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +``` + +## Retained claims and limits + +Unchanged declarations retain the code-derived meanings in the initial manuscript. In particular, Assessed still ignores labels; Duties still depends on arbitrary predicates; the token consequence relation is still finite and explicitly stipulated; ChangeReported is still only a Boolean condition on list inequality; the observation-gap conjunctions still have no evidence-support relation; and namedUniversalTruth still returns the supplied proof h unchanged. The new assessment computation and new state-list output theorem do not alter those independent limitations. Line numbers in the initial manuscript belong to the frozen initial inputs; use line-explanations-current.json for current locations. + +## Actual checks and dependencies + +Both revised files were copied verbatim into *.current.audit.lean with only #print axioms commands appended for every top-level declared definition, type, structure, and theorem, then elaborated and kernel-checked with installed Lean 4.33.1. Both commands exited 0. The declaration-by-declaration logs are CoreReader.current.audit.log and RationaleReader.current.audit.log. The same retained set of theorem names reported propext as in the initial audit; self_assessment_not_correctness still uses propext. The added SelfAssessingSystem, runOwnAssessment, sampleSystem, originalStates, revisedStates, compareReads, and revised_method_retains_case reported no axioms. No user axiom or sorry was introduced. The checked List.all body and Decidable.decide definition are recorded in core-library-inspection.log. Decidable.decide returns false for an isFalse decision and true for an isTrue decision; its Decidable argument is a core-inferred typeclass instance here. + +The full current nonblank-line explanation is line-explanations-current.json, with both en and zh for every line, including comments, fields, definitions, proof steps, and namespace delimiters. Unchanged entries were reused only through exact aligned code lines, while the changed Core block and all newly added Rationale lines were explained afresh. This is an explanation and formal dependency check, not independent validation of source meaning or philosophical correctness. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..48ad2b5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json @@ -0,0 +1,894 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", + "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" + }, + "initial_records": [ + { + "role": "source_initial", + "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", + "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" + }, + { + "role": "code_blind", + "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", + "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" + }, + { + "role": "code_informed_update", + "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", + "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison", + "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", + "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" + } + ], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "c-10-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-10-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-47-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-54-c1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed.", + "reason_zh": "Consistent以整个同时持有列表推得同一context的正反结论，p/pImpliesQ/notQ实例确有联合推论。这里只表示一个问题和合并的context编号，未分开含义、假设、范围，也不是一般推论演算；义务仅被定义为谓词，未证明普遍履行。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled.", + "reason_zh": "缩减后的当前列表[.p,.pImpliesQ]在fixtureConsequence中没有否定结论，可示例说明撤回后的相容状态；未建模修订事件、前后时态关系或许可语义。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c4", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal.", + "reason_zh": "选定的撤回操作在claimsUnchanged=true时不满足ChangeReported，只演示报告约束，并未证明报告实际发生。一般List不等还包含重排或重复元素的差别，强于语义变化；对应关系仅限展示的实质撤回实例。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean.", + "reason_zh": "选定实例中，不同context编号下的相反结论不能组成同一context冲突，可展示原文“不自动构成矛盾”的区别；实际假设、含义、范围为何不同仍需在Lean之外解释。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-72-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself.", + "reason_zh": "修订在SelfAssessingSystem中实际存储ownPrinciple与samples，并以同一所属谓词计算runOwnAssessment。展示的系统在自身样本[1]上返回true，而其自身谓词在0处为假，形成有解释依据的有限自评反例。空样本也通过，加入0则拒绝；另一个恒真所属原则既通过又普遍正确。因此对应仅限此具体所属关系与测试解释：不证明每次自评都不足，也未完整编码反身性、形成/修订、适用性或对评估规则本身的评价。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-84-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c2", + "fidelity": "rejected", + "reason": "ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", + "reason_zh": "ObservationComplete只问列表是否包含所有自然数，没有观测结果、主张身份、根据关系或支持相称规则。真假算术结论仅分别与同一覆盖缺口并列，且真结论本身另有证明。未穷尽输入不等于支持不足，无观测结果的穷尽输入也不等于充分支持。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c3", + "fidelity": "rejected", + "reason": "unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", + "reason_zh": "unrelated_grounds_rejected因bothExamined要求编号3而拒绝编号4，只保留编号敏感性。它没有考察具体根据是否支持对应主张，没有考察结果，也没有将该记录解释为这种考察的依据。变量名examined不能建立原文责任。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c5", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation.", + "reason_zh": "Duties保留同一主张/根据对上每个适用面的全称责任，经验/价值混合实例确实拒绝仅有经验记录。Aspect的三个构造子是预设应用分类，不是推导出的穷尽分类；mixed_projection展开既有责任假设，bothExamined预设记录。均未建模经验、推论、价值考察的实质责任，也未验证examined关系。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c6", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility.", + "reason_zh": "Assessed刻意忽略labels并依据实际适用性，因此任意标签列表在定义上等价，空列表也不能掩盖适用价值记录的缺失。这是条件化接口设计及具体遗漏探针，并非实际分类器发现全部适用责任的独立证明。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-130-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + } + ], + "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9a2a0cd --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json @@ -0,0 +1,904 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", + "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" + }, + "initial_records": [ + { + "role": "source_initial", + "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", + "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" + }, + { + "role": "code_blind", + "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", + "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" + }, + { + "role": "code_informed_update", + "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", + "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison", + "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", + "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" + }, + { + "role": "source_initial_migration", + "path": "reviews/migration-source-initial.md", + "sha256": "6c16785adf65077a7187a18094704874c9ae09721e01a8d7d88c7d96e7eb0a11" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison_migration", + "path": "reviews/migration-source-comparison.md", + "sha256": "3691f6e7a6479436b62c927abc3b7ccb4491c1f7aa59bfc25880b52c867f75aa" + } + ], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "c-10-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-10-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-47-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-54-c1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed.", + "reason_zh": "Consistent以整个同时持有列表推得同一context的正反结论，p/pImpliesQ/notQ实例确有联合推论。这里只表示一个问题和合并的context编号，未分开含义、假设、范围，也不是一般推论演算；义务仅被定义为谓词，未证明普遍履行。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled.", + "reason_zh": "缩减后的当前列表[.p,.pImpliesQ]在fixtureConsequence中没有否定结论，可示例说明撤回后的相容状态；未建模修订事件、前后时态关系或许可语义。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c4", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal.", + "reason_zh": "选定的撤回操作在claimsUnchanged=true时不满足ChangeReported，只演示报告约束，并未证明报告实际发生。一般List不等还包含重排或重复元素的差别，强于语义变化；对应关系仅限展示的实质撤回实例。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean.", + "reason_zh": "选定实例中，不同context编号下的相反结论不能组成同一context冲突，可展示原文“不自动构成矛盾”的区别；实际假设、含义、范围为何不同仍需在Lean之外解释。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-72-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself.", + "reason_zh": "修订在SelfAssessingSystem中实际存储ownPrinciple与samples，并以同一所属谓词计算runOwnAssessment。展示的系统在自身样本[1]上返回true，而其自身谓词在0处为假，形成有解释依据的有限自评反例。空样本也通过，加入0则拒绝；另一个恒真所属原则既通过又普遍正确。因此对应仅限此具体所属关系与测试解释：不证明每次自评都不足，也未完整编码反身性、形成/修订、适用性或对评估规则本身的评价。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-84-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c2", + "fidelity": "rejected", + "reason": "ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", + "reason_zh": "ObservationComplete只问列表是否包含所有自然数，没有观测结果、主张身份、根据关系或支持相称规则。真假算术结论仅分别与同一覆盖缺口并列，且真结论本身另有证明。未穷尽输入不等于支持不足，无观测结果的穷尽输入也不等于充分支持。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c3", + "fidelity": "rejected", + "reason": "unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", + "reason_zh": "unrelated_grounds_rejected因bothExamined要求编号3而拒绝编号4，只保留编号敏感性。它没有考察具体根据是否支持对应主张，没有考察结果，也没有将该记录解释为这种考察的依据。变量名examined不能建立原文责任。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c5", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation.", + "reason_zh": "Duties保留同一主张/根据对上每个适用面的全称责任，经验/价值混合实例确实拒绝仅有经验记录。Aspect的三个构造子是预设应用分类，不是推导出的穷尽分类；mixed_projection展开既有责任假设，bothExamined预设记录。均未建模经验、推论、价值考察的实质责任，也未验证examined关系。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c6", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility.", + "reason_zh": "Assessed刻意忽略labels并依据实际适用性，因此任意标签列表在定义上等价，空列表也不能掩盖适用价值记录的缺失。这是条件化接口设计及具体遗漏探针，并非实际分类器发现全部适用责任的独立证明。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-130-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", + "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + } + ], + "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials. Pure relocation: source, code and original initial records have identical bytes; the preceding correspondence grades are reused, not newly blind-assessed. Migration source/method comparison is separately recorded." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b1d6d7e --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +# Migration review export + +Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `6c2528756e18a36dfb24a5aafd8b6b499f60f41adc26c2ad78fc43dd310e7b81`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. + +# Independent candidate comparison + +Compared after preserved source-initial.md; initial source bytes matched frozen baseline. New candidate read includes Core/outer skills, philosophy-resolution, AGENTS, iteration, structure, rationale row 133 and its Chinese counterpart. The only live-source uncertainty from initial reading (new zh/AGENTS appendix) was excluded from the initial source judgment. + +## Judgment + +The revised row describes the authorized implementation change without revising philosophy 0.1.3. It keeps English text as the commitments and separates tool success from source fidelity, sufficient grounds and philosophical correctness. Ordinary assessments retain no Lean prerequisite. Revisability under this repository's objectives/constraints preserves the prior distinction between contextual design choice and philosophical obligation. The row does not state that text/tool presence proves clarity, capability or correctness. It therefore addresses the original script-free rationale rather than silently leaving an obsolete reason. + +The Chinese row preserves the same force and limits. “可复跑的形式化支持” is a contextual translation of reproducible formalization support; it does not claim every semantic judgment can be reproduced mechanically. “工具通过不确立…” retains non-sufficiency, and “前置要求” retains ordinary-assessment scope. No supported wording or translation defect identified in this row. No philosophical absorption or version change follows merely from the migration. + +New Core method owns proof/translation and Core parser support; outer methods preserve inputs and route rather than duplicate. Explicit selection and real source directory survive delegation, failed explicit/workspace lookup cannot trigger Core fallback, and standalone code explanation requires no philosophy. Maintenance rules bind changes to real dependencies and distinguish historical replay from current approval. They expressly require accurate incomplete/failed/limited/unmodeled states, not every proof passing. These provisions fit the initial responsibility boundaries. + +One concrete documentation issue: new Core run-format.md initially told users to run `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js` from the outer repository. The command is relative to Core root and fails as written from outer. Requested minimal correction to “from the Core repository.” No change to the implementation needed for this finding. + +## New rationale clauses and evidence reuse + +Seven row components are separately inventoried. The row label is structural/not applicable to proof; its six explanatory claims remain incomplete/unmodeled where no Lean declaration supports them. Their source-first review establishes that the prose can serve as authorized non-normative rationale, not that Lean has proved it. Unchanged prior definitions, theorem statements, attached old mapping hashes and code-derived explanations may be reused only if exact objects remain unchanged and the reuse is disclosed. New rationale source requires a new run/comparison object; old source snapshots and judgments remain intact. Final corpus verification is still pending; this comparison does not pre-approve future manifests or translations. + +## Actual use and limits + +See independent-skill-cases/skill-responses.md and per-command JSON. Core/outer mechanical builds and declaration audits both exit 0 with semantic_status not_evaluated after preserving an initial no-declaration rejection. Lean-only identity builds, returns its explicit premise and has no axiom dependencies. Explicit downstream baseline 0.7.2 is retained; missing explicit path fails with no Core fallback. Results support these bounded behavior checks, not whole-text fidelity or proof completeness. + +Self-check across six dimensions: consistency and responsibility allocation are preserved; required source and baseline distinctions are covered in the observed variations; runtime behavior has actual evidence for the named paths; failure cases remain visible and can rebut wider claims; no autonomous capability is inferred from added tools; thin forwarding reduces method duplication while retaining contextual review costs. No new material philosophical choice arose. Further review is justified only for the final new evidence/manuscript objects and the reported command-location correction. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b13bca7 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +# Migration review export + +Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `47a9f88895b7fa1f4366d2ba3ca8e0bf4a75ee82697745cb5673f4c3056a8376`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. + +# Independent source-first assessment + +Recorded 2026-09-13 before reading the author candidate, new Lean code, author reports, or reader verdicts. Reviewer received the raw objective and existing Core philosophy/rationale/methods plus the two current outer Lean skills. The live Chinese AGENTS read already contains a Lean-reader section; it is excluded from this initial source judgment because its timing is uncertain. + +## Fixed source and objective + +Core `PHILOSOPHY.md` declares philosophy/core 0.1.3, format 0.1.0. The English text, including meanings and limits, is the assessment authority. Move Lean implementation and tools into Core, retain outer entrypoints, synchronize actual dependencies and corresponding Chinese text, and report accurate individual statuses without a quota requiring all proofs to pass. This is authorized implementation maintenance, not adoption of a changed philosophy. + +## Original-source judgment and row 133 + +Rationale row 133 currently chooses “A text-centered core and script-free skills.” Its contextual reason is a thin, inspectable text layer without an execution framework; its limit explicitly says that script absence is a design choice and other applications may reasonably use tools. This is non-normative explanatory rationale, not a timeless philosophical prohibition. Core AGENTS currently says delivered core/skills remain text-only. The new explicit objective replaces that implementation constraint within this scope. Merely deleting row 133 would lose the reason/limit distinction: revise it to explain inspectable English commitments plus optional, revisable Lean implementations/tools, justified by source correspondence and reproducible bounded evidence. Preserve that text/tools do not establish clarity, capability, philosophical truth, or universal necessity. Do not describe Lean as part of the philosophical authority or require ordinary assessments to formalize their inputs. + +## Responsibility and dependency boundaries + +- Philosophy 2.1 requires appropriate support for empirical, inferential and value aspects; mechanical checking supplies conditional inferential evidence and cannot certify empirical adequacy or adopted values. +- Philosophy 1.3 forbids concealing changed judgments/conditions; frozen historical results and current stale status must coexist accurately. +- Philosophy 1.4 preserves self-application conditions and rejects self-proof; independent review is the repository method, not a philosophical theorem. +- Philosophy 2.4 requires reasons for the migration and retains alternatives. Central ownership can reduce duplicated implementation while keeping public wrappers; names and Core placement supply no extra authority. +- Existing assess owns compatibility; absorb owns adoption; principled-review returns six-dimension findings; wording review owns language quality only. Lean proof owns inventory, encoding, dependency audit and conditional mechanical result; natural-language skill explains code and compares correspondence without silently upgrading it. +- Current outer proof skill uses outer resolver, parser/checker and references. Relocation must inspect their real imports and data paths, preserve explicit selected baselines, reject invalid explicit paths without fallback, and retain standalone syntax explanation without requiring a philosophical baseline. +- A successful build/audit is not source fidelity. Missing independent review remains incomplete/provisional. Accepted fragments stay limited; rejected correspondence can fail despite a successful build; unsupported/unfinished does not mean false. Verified countermodels can support non-entailment and must not mark the refuted implication as passed. +- Synchronize source/baseline/code/review/manuscript bindings when those dependencies change. Preserve historical evidence and never overwrite hashes to make old evidence current. Structural or wording-only unrelated changes must not require pretending all prior formal claims changed. + +## Six-dimension initial assessment + +Consistency: migration is compatible if the old script-free policy is explicitly updated and authority/status distinctions survive. Minimal completeness: preserve both entrypoints, reference assets, ordinary-text partitioning, explicit-baseline failure behavior and whole-claim/unmodeled coverage; do not use a path-only check as evidence of runtime usability. External adequacy: executable paths, installed toolchain and portable packages need actual checks; currently unknown. Rebuttal: a code-only explanation wrongly resolving philosophy, a changed source shown current, or a rejected mapping shown passed refutes the corresponding implementation claim. Self-transcendence: implementation revisability supports the authorized change but does not prove improvement; the static Lean artifact need not have autonomous orientation. Occam: one Core implementation with narrow outer delegation is preferable if functionality and boundaries are preserved; mechanical duplication merely renamed is not established simplification. + +## Independent small cases, registered before candidate + +Case A — ordinary source: “A workshop values preserving an existing craft. This commitment does not require every implementation to use its oldest tool.” Apply proof workflow to this two-sentence ordinary-text object. Preserve both clauses with nonoverlapping local IDs; distinguish commitment from limit/non-entailment; no metadata injection and no automatic adoption of the source. Any completed proof is conditional on an explicitly explained encoding. Missing review means incomplete rather than passed. + +Case B — Lean-only snippet: `theorem retained (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h`. Apply natural-language entrypoint in both Core and outer with no source prose or adopted baseline. Explain that P is already an explicit premise, conclusion supplied by h, and no independent support or source fidelity is established. A code-only explanation is possible even if no philosophy resolves; mark kernel result unverified unless actual checking runs. + +Case C — baseline variation: repeat A with an explicit downstream baseline file, then an explicit nonexistent baseline path. Retain the valid selected baseline and its directory/version; invalid explicit selection must stop the dependent compatibility stage without silently using bundled Core, while source inventory can continue. A later changed maintained baseline makes a current reader judgment stale, not its frozen theorem false. + +Self-check: these are method/implementation acceptance boundaries, not extra philosophical commitments. Source-only initial assessment cannot certify candidate runtime behavior, translation or semantic fidelity. No candidate verdict is issued yet. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fab352a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `cb99ad55a0e4dad0f45f74ef91d279313333a2571a48e0d3856670ad2734272b`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 第二轮：两个修订对应的独立复评 + +日期：2026-09-13。仅复评c-83-c2和r-121-c4；旧初评、第一轮比较及其四项拒绝判断全部保留，不改写历史。本轮两个新版本均判断partial，详见mapped-judgments-round2.json中的逐条双语理由。c-89-c2和c-94-c3没有修正相关语义，继续rejected。 + +## 新证据与判断变化 + +c-83-c2：SelfAssessingSystem现在实际持有ownPrinciple和samples，runOwnAssessment确实计算同一所属谓词在自身样本上的结果。sampleSystem的[1]通过而0反驳其普遍正确，原先“只有名称、没有对象所属关系与实际考察”的缺口已在这个狭窄解释中补足。因此由rejected改为partial。仍没有形成/修订、适用条件、对评估规则本身的评估或全部反身性；不能从这个实例宣称任何自评都失败或自评永远不能支持正确结论。 + +r-121-c4：删除updateInvalidating实现修复示例，新增originalStates/revisedStates和实际compareReads。direct与cachedRead不变，修订的是比较状态集合，结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)，与本句的评估范围修订有直接有限对应。因此由rejected改为partial。它只是一个静态案例与一个变化案例，未建模一般测试运行器、任意序列、并发或所有回归案例。 + +## 自选实际边界变体 + +所有源码快照、探针、完整重跑命令、首次失败和实际输出保存在reader-round2-probes/。不是仅列计划或手动推断。 + +1. Core：把samples改为空列表，runOwnAssessment返回true，但所属谓词仍在0处为假；把samples改为[1,0]返回false；另建恒真所属谓词，测试返回true且能证明全部输入正确。四个实际输出为(true,true,false,true)，顺序为空样本、原实例、含反例样本、恒真原则。通过可以空泛，也可以与错误或正确并存，是否有实质支持仍需要解释采样和主张范围。 +2. Rationale：compareReads在空状态列表输出[]，仅initial输出[(10,10)]，加入updateOnly initial 10仍只有相同对，真实revisedStates输出[(10,10),(11,10)]。另实际证明initial属于revisedStates。评估修订的可见贡献依赖加入相关变化，不由列表更长或“revised”名称保证。 + +这些边界不要求扩大公布模型。它们要求公布措辞保留“选定非空实例”“加入11这一相关变化”“有限反例/有限比较”，不把样本通过说成完整自评能力，也不把任意新增案例说成改进。 + +## 实际运行与限制 + +首次尝试在两个工程执行lake env lean并导入模块，均因工程搜索路径无对应olean返回1；Lake同时自动创建了此前不存在的lake-manifest.json。未假装首次运行通过。随后将所读完整源码快照与探针体拼接成两个独立Lean文件，使用固定Lean4.33.1二进制检查，均返回0并输出上述结果。这同时检查了源声明与新探针，无需依赖一个未知的新旧构建产物。实际结果含恢复过程和快照hash。 + +本轮未修改维护源码、run.json、原初评或第一轮判断。除Lake自动生成manifest外，新增文件仅在忽略的P下。无需重复已通过探针；后续若文稿宣称超出上述范围，应作为新的具体措辞/对应问题审查。没有full判断或哲学正确性认证。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..19ae64a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `37695a48276f635e264f19ccc07bef559600946518835eef37029ab18c7b3a1d`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 原文初评与已披露编码比较 + +日期：2026-09-13。比较者：reader_source_initial。本轮是在source-initial.md和source-inventory.json冻结后进行的知情比较；不修改两份初评文件。基线仍为Core 0.1.3英文正本及当前rationale。已读取两个run.json、两个完整Lean源文件、encoding-preregistration.md，以及两份entry-data的全部映射条目。输入hash单独保存在comparison-input-hashes.json。 + +## 判断 + +16个已映射源子句中，12项支持有限对应（partial），4项拒绝当前对应（rejected）。另记录15项实质未编码内容为pending，108项结构或表格角色/名称为not_applicable。无full判断。mapped-judgments.json提供逐项英文及中文理由，id使用clause_id；clause=null则使用entry_id。未列出的实质主张应由汇总者明确标为pending并说明没有编码，不能因为条目缺席视为通过。 + +构建与依赖审计通过是调用者披露的机械结果；本轮未重复构建。所有保真判断来自实际定义、完整定理陈述与源文对应，不来自build状态。没有把未建模判为哲学缺陷。 + +## 四项当前对应应撤回或修订 + +1. c-89-c2：ObservationComplete只表示列表覆盖全部自然数，不含观测结果、主张、根据和支持关系。因此observation_gap及真假结论并列定理均不能表示“根据支持与主张强度/范围相称”。尤其真结论n+0=n已有独立证明，不能因列表未覆盖全部自然数称它支持不足；反过来只有输入覆盖也不保证观测内容为真或相关。预注册的“coverage sufficiency criterion”并未以证据与结论的关系实现，而且若被视为一般充分支持会改变原义。最小修正是撤回这四项对c-89-c2的映射，保留未映射的算术/覆盖示例；若要重新映射，需要明确的仅凭观测记录的蕴涵模型及额外假设，不能以名称补足。 +2. c-94-c3：unrelated_grounds_rejected仅因bothExamined要求grounds=3而拒绝4，证明的是记录编号不匹配。它没有实现“考察那些根据是否支持相应主张”。允许examined作为外部关系的条件化接口，不等于具体编号等式已经有考察语义。应撤回对这句实质考察责任的映射，保留编号完整性探针。c-94-c5/c6可保留为条件化责任分配和分类标签无免责效力的有限接口。 +3. c-83-c2：self_assessment_not_correctness是样本1通过、输入0失败的局部测试反例。没有系统、它的评估原则或将同一评估原则用于自身的行为；selfAssessmentSamples只是名称。应撤回当前自评对应，或建立有解释依据的自评对象与行为实例。这个算术结果可有限说明局部通过不能保证普遍正确，但后者不等同于原文的反身对象关系。 +4. r-121-c4：invalidation_restores_fixture修改了实现，令acknowledged与cached同步；原文此句说修订评估方法，比较两个候选的update–read序列并保留静态案例。不能把修复实现当成修订评估方法。最小修正是将映射改为实际update_read_counterexample加original_comparison/unchanged_update_retained，并仍标partial；正向失效更新实例可保留为额外候选示例，不能凭它证明测试集合保留或评估流程已形式化。 + +## 有限成立之处及保留界限 + +- 实际类型叫Aspect，具有empirical/inferential/value三个构造子，源码没有Kind声明。这是应用预设分类而非完整认识论分类的证明。Duties保留同一claim/grounds对及每个实际适用面的责任；mixed_projection只是由已假设的Duties投影，不构成外部责任已履行的证据。bothExamined及empiricalOnly是编号/标签记录，未实现经验考察的不确定性、推论支持关系或价值批评责任。标签遗漏反例能说明该接口的责任不随labels变化，不能证明真实适用分类已穷尽。 +- Consistent的整个held列表可产生联合后果，p/pImpliesQ/notQ确实触发一个context的正反结论；撤回及不同context示例提供有限对应。context把问题/假设/含义/范围折叠，推论关系是一个预设实例而非通用逻辑系统。ChangeReported只在实质撤回实例中对应明确；一般List不等会把重排或重复也视为变化，不能泛称语义变化判定器。 +- R1：namedUniversalTruth明确为h:P推出P，不是无条件普遍真理。0≤1与被2反驳的∀n,n≤1构成条件/量词改变的具体反例，支持“证明这个陈述不能自动建立另一个陈述”的有限说明。different_statement_refuted确实断言这个选定更强命题为假；这可以是具体见证，但中文英文解释均须避免提升为“凡对应失败，散文主张必假”。未编码一般证明可靠性、任意编码对应或哲学承诺的真假。r-77-c1与c4仍未映射。 +- 软件初态10/10、预算6下时延5/2均合格；updateOnly改为11后缓存仍10，直接读取11。它们实现源案例的一个明确反例，未建模真实时延、并发或全部故障。budget3是另一情境，预算定理仅覆盖r-119-c2合取义务的时延部分，新鲜度责任仍未表达。 +- 当前rationale.L120（r-120-c2至c6）没有任何声明映射，旧method-stage对应已撤回；这是正确保留缺口。此处的Grounds/Consistency/Reflexivity/可审查性推论不能由算术状态定理替代。r-119-c1与r-120-c1等“Additional premises”“Inference”只是表格角色，已标not_applicable。 + +## 范围与自检 + +本轮对所有16个已映射子句逐项检查了实际声明；未宣称全部未映射子句已做同等深度编码评审。结构、表格角色名称与实质论断分开，源文仍完整保留。模型失败不改写原文；既有初评与hash不变。判断标准没有因作者声明“checked”或“limited”而降低，partial也不意味着完整子句已被证明。有限接口可作为可读实例；错误的直接对应应修正而不是仅靠总体免责声明稀释。 + +没有必要递归委派或重跑相同构建。后续仅需比较有实质变化的映射/编码和文稿陈述，并分别保留原判与新判。未执行维护文件修改或哲学采用。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..90b1632 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `5a292830b2fdb6e0670049bf56bbb278416fd2418272e4d586bd8f0f904386b8`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Independent source-only initial assessment — frozen + +Date: 2026-09-13. Reviewer: reader_source_initial. This record precedes disclosure of any current candidate encoding, author verdict, or expected comparison result. Selected baseline: `OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md` philosophy/core 0.1.3, English authority. Companion: `OrganonCore/docs/rationale.md`, non-normative. Goal supplied by caller: faithful limited Lean formalization and two-granularity English/Chinese explanations covering the 22 Core text units and the complete rationale. No candidate has been assessed here, and this is not an adoption judgment. + +## Provenance and limits of independence + +Read the supplied Core AGENTS, PHILOSOPHY and rationale in full; RTK instructions; assess, principled-review, wording-review, shared iteration and philosophy-resolution instructions; translation guidance. No candidate code, author rationale, prior detailed review, blind translation, or archive package was opened. AGENTS instructed starting local records from ACTIVE.md; reading that index incidentally exposed one-line historical task summaries, including an earlier description of Assessment as an accepted conditional normative interface. Those summaries are not source evidence and are not used to determine this judgment. This limited exposure prevents claiming complete ignorance of historical verdict metadata. Exact source clauses, not that summary, ground the distinctions below. No recursive delegation occurred. + +## Initial judgment and expected fidelity boundaries + +The source supports a limited formal interpretation of selected responsibility and support relations, if the interpretation explicitly preserves normative force, applicability, and the distinction between supporting a claim and examining its support. It does not supply a complete formal ontology, inference calculus, support metric, or source-to-model correspondence proof. The success of a Lean check could establish an encoded statement under its assumptions; its relevance to the prose remains a separate judgment. Unknown correspondence is not a pass, a core conflict, or proof that the source is defective. + +1. Core preamble: adopted commitments, meanings, and application limits constitute the authority; they are not descriptive laws of every system. Charter and Grounds mutually constrain each other without priority or deductive hierarchy. Rationale and contextual skill requirements must retain their separate status. +2. Self-Transcendence: expansion is valued, not merely allowed. Organization, methods and principles remain revisable. Orientation, permission, actual change and supported achievement are different. Universal nonfinality within the relevant existing forms does not impose change on every action, guarantee progress, exclude justified stability, or demand independence from external help. +3. Internal Consistency: preserve simultaneous holding and implications, same question, assumptions, meanings and scope. Changing or withdrawing a judgment may remove co-holding; concealed redefinition cannot erase a prior contradiction. Tension is not yet contradiction. Compatibility cannot stand for correctness, adequacy or inferential entailment. +4. Reflexivity: both system and formation/application/revision of principles are assessment and generation objects, subject to their applicable conditions. No self exemption when conditions hold, no unconditional application of every principle to itself. Self-application and internally produced revision do not establish correctness or sufficient grounds. +5. Grounds and Assessment: articulability identifies concepts, assumptions, reasons and limits. Assessment examines whether those grounds support the corresponding claim; completing it may establish insufficient support. It must not be encoded as an obligation to obtain a successful support verdict, nor as a completed marker lacking claim/grounds/conditions correspondence. Each applicable mixed aspect retains its responsibility even without a classification tag. Empirical assessment examines evidence/performance plus support conditions, scope and uncertainty; inferential assessment examines assumptions and inferential relations; value assessment states position, reasons, limits and consequences and stays open to relevant criticism. An initial value commitment need not prove every starting assumption. The general proportionate-support constraint limits claims; it does not guarantee all assessed claims are supported. +6. Scope and tools: local agreement cannot establish unconditional universals or absence of omitted differences. Measurement, repetition and frameworks can be useful but form no universally mandatory chain. A verifiable unreproduced observation may offer limited support; stochastic output identity and stability of conclusions are different. +7. Capability claims: application-specific definitions and conditions determine the actual claim. External evidence may support a capability without internal explanation; reliable output does not automatically establish understanding. An application may explicitly require explanation. Counts alone do not establish expansion. Narrowing a definition creates a new claim and cannot retroactively prove the old one. +8. Choice commitment: relevant reasons connect priority to objectives, values and constraints. Name, convention or status alone are insufficient; tradition may embody an explicitly adopted value with a relevant connection. This additional commitment is not derived merely from grouping it under Grounds. Openness does not imply equivalence, multiple feasible means, mandatory novelty, or rejection of established methods. Internal method properties may matter. +9. Relationships and terms: retain all foregoing distinctions under mutual application; no self-proof follows. “Assessment” includes reasons, applicability and observed performance and is not limited to executable tests. Read that list with the type-appropriate assessment responsibilities rather than silently making empirical outcome evidence mandatory for every claim type. +10. Rationale: preserve arguments’ premises, objections and limits, historical placement assertions as assertions of this text, and all illustrative cases. Removal checks concern loss of an explicit contribution, expressly not formal independence. Hypothetical research/software examples add contextual values and constraints; potential contributions and bounded support are not actual proof of domain-wide improvement. Repository tools, English authority, independent-first review and records are contextual arrangements rather than philosophical theorems. +11. Formal-proof example (rationale line 77): the hypothesis includes a checked proof whose encoding changes the claim’s conditions or claim-to-grounds relation. Its encoded statement is established relative to assumptions and proof dependencies, but this does not thereby establish the different prose claim. Correspondence failure is initially a modeling finding, not itself a reason to revise the commitment. A formalization must keep checked derivation, source interpretation and support relevance separately reviewable. Non-entailment must not be replaced by falsity of the prose conclusion. + +## Questions not fixed by the source + +- “Intrinsic orientation when expansion is regarded as worth pursuing” supplies an intended meaning but no measurable criterion or complete equivalence schema. A model’s precise predicate/definition is an interpretation to disclose. +- Contradiction, relevant implications, and the admissible inference calculus are not algorithmically fixed. Selecting classical proposition logic, a finite claim domain, or a closure rule adds modeling choices. +- Proportionate support has no universal numerical or ordered scale in the text. Claim/grounds correspondence and sufficient support require interpreted relations and contextual evidence; their names alone cannot establish them. +- Applicable aspects are not supplied as an exhaustive classification algorithm. A finite aspect datatype can be a bounded application interface only if its coverage limits and unclassified cases are explicit. +- The Assessment terminology row does not define a formal selector for when observed-performance examination applies. Its claim-appropriate context rules out silently making empirical evidence a universal prerequisite; an exact selector remains an additional interpretation. +- The proof example contains no concrete model or correspondence test; it cannot determine an unseen candidate’s fidelity. The software example does not fully specify concurrency semantics or all workloads; the research example supplies no actual study results. These are bounded examples, not omissions to fill as source commitments. +- The rationale’s external simplicity-source attribution has been preserved but not independently fact-checked in this source-only task. No judgment about the external article’s accuracy is offered. + +These are interpretation and support boundaries, not established contradictions in the philosophy. None authorizes changing the adopted commitments. + +## Coverage and bounded self-check + +`source-inventory.json` preserves exact text and line numbers for every nonempty source line, including every paragraph, table row, heading, ID and metadata line. Each substantive entry has a source-specific initial reading of force, conditions, intended contribution and unresolved questions, plus first-pass clause splits and force/scope markers. Splitting is not a formal parse; nested semantic clauses can remain. Structural rows carry no independent philosophical obligations. The Core has exactly 22 stable IDs: 20 directly contain substantive text and two (`organon.charter`, `organon.relationships`) are structural groupings. They must not be populated with invented commitments merely to match a count. + +Actual checks: the inventory contains 202 exact nonempty lines (Core 99; rationale 103), with 119 substantive paragraph/table entries. These are documentary coverage checks, not whole-text semantic-completeness certification. No model, proof, bilingual candidate or actual reader outcome was inspected. No claim is made about universal adequacy, formal independence, minimality, or philosophical truth. + +Bounded review of this record: consistency checked by keeping responsibilities separate from successful outcomes and current commitments separate from contextual methods; completeness is limited to the supplied source and first-pass clause readings; external adequacy of hypothetical cases cannot be inferred without actual evidence; a concrete correspondence counterexample can revise a later candidate judgment; a static inventory need not display a system’s generative orientation; no comparative parsimony advantage is claimed without a comparable alternative. An initial inventory is useful as a traceable baseline, not sufficient as fidelity evidence. Stop here until candidate disclosure supplies new evidence. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..eadcbc7 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,39 @@ +# Reported source fidelity + +These are reported semantic judgments, not kernel conclusions. Initial records precede comparison; revised mappings have informed follow-up judgments. Two rejected attempts have editorial current-result wording; their original independent reasons and verdicts remain in the initial comparison export. The bound records and exact object hashes are listed in fidelity.json. Unmodeled entries remain pending; structure is not a philosophical theorem. + +## c-54-c1 — partial + +Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed. + +## c-59-c2 — partial + +The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled. + +## c-59-c4 — partial + +The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal. + +## c-61-c2 — partial + +Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean. + +## c-83-c2 — partial + +The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself. + +## c-89-c2 — rejected + +ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. + +## c-94-c3 — rejected + +unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. + +## c-94-c5 — partial + +Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation. + +## c-94-c6 — partial + +Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..90c9802 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json @@ -0,0 +1,1345 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "source": { + "kind": "organon", + "path": "snapshots/source.md", + "snapshot": "snapshots/source.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "metadata": { + "format_version": "0.1.0", + "philosophy_version": "0.1.3", + "core_version": "0.1.3", + "derived_from": null + } + }, + "baseline": { + "path": "snapshots/philosophy.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" + }, + "project": { + "path": "leanified", + "root_module": "CoreReader" + }, + "preregistration": { + "path": "PREREGISTERED.md", + "sha256": "566dbb98e64acce0e25f454c5a890a4280eff60d3684b5f54b1164933804c263" + }, + "units": [ + { + "id": "organon.preamble", + "hash": "450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-10-c1", + "claim": "This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-10-c2", + "claim": "It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c1", + "claim": "The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c2", + "claim": "The charter and Grounds constrain one another;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c3", + "claim": "their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c4", + "claim": "Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Structural heading with no independently modeled claim.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview", + "hash": "75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-22-c1", + "claim": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c2", + "claim": "It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c1", + "claim": "The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c2", + "claim": "The provisions below specify the conditions for each.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", + "hash": "f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-29-c1", + "claim": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c2", + "claim": "It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "hash": "7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-34-c1", + "claim": "A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c2", + "claim": "A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c3", + "claim": "Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "hash": "4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-39-c1", + "claim": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c2", + "claim": "“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c3", + "claim": "These remain within the scope of possible change;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c4", + "claim": "their revisability does not guarantee actual progress.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "hash": "6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-44-c1", + "claim": "Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c2", + "claim": "Having the orientation does not guarantee progress.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c3", + "claim": "Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c1", + "claim": "“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c2", + "claim": "it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-47-c1", + "claim": "Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c1", + "claim": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c2", + "claim": "Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c1", + "claim": "Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c2", + "claim": "a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency", + "hash": "c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-54-c1", + "claim": "The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Consistent", + "CoreReader.joint_conflict" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "hash": "81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-59-c1", + "claim": "“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c2", + "claim": "Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment;", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set" + ] + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c3", + "claim": "old and new principles need not remain compatible forever.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c4", + "claim": "When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report" + ] + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c1", + "claim": "“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c2", + "claim": "Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts" + ] + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c3", + "claim": "Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "hash": "4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-66-c1", + "claim": "Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c2", + "claim": "Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c1", + "claim": "Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c2", + "claim": "A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity", + "hash": "13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-72-c1", + "claim": "A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "hash": "8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-77-c1", + "claim": "Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c2", + "claim": "Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c3", + "claim": "The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "hash": "ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-82-c1", + "claim": "Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c2", + "claim": "When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c3", + "claim": "Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c1", + "claim": "Self-application does not constitute self-proof.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c2", + "claim": "Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "c-84-c1", + "claim": "That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds", + "hash": "4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-89-c1", + "claim": "The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c2", + "claim": "The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion" + ] + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "hash": "2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-94-c1", + "claim": "Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c2", + "claim": "Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c3", + "claim": "Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected" + ] + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c4", + "claim": "Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c5", + "claim": "When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Duties", + "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected" + ] + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c6", + "claim": "Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected" + ] + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c1", + "claim": "Empirical claim", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c2", + "claim": "Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c3", + "claim": "Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c1", + "claim": "Inferential claim", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c2", + "claim": "Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c3", + "claim": "Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c1", + "claim": "Value commitment", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c2", + "claim": "State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c3", + "claim": "Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c1", + "claim": "Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c2", + "claim": "they need not prove all their own starting assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c3", + "claim": "The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c4", + "claim": "Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope", + "hash": "4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-107-c1", + "claim": "Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c2", + "claim": "A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c3", + "claim": "A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c1", + "claim": "Measurement can make some differences comparable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c2", + "claim": "Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c3", + "claim": "Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c4", + "claim": "Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c1", + "claim": "An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c2", + "claim": "The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "hash": "7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-116-c1", + "claim": "Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c2", + "claim": "The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c3", + "claim": "Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c1", + "claim": "Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c2", + "claim": "Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c3", + "claim": "Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c4", + "claim": "it does not automatically establish understanding of that process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c5", + "claim": "Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "hash": "bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-123-c1", + "claim": "The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c2", + "claim": "Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c1", + "claim": "This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c2", + "claim": "Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c3", + "claim": "Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "hash": "db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-130-c1", + "claim": "Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c1", + "claim": "A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c2", + "claim": "They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c1", + "claim": "Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c2", + "claim": "Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c1", + "claim": "Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c2", + "claim": "Relevant reasons may still give it priority.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Structural heading with no independently modeled claim.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles", + "hash": "24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-141-c1", + "claim": "The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c2", + "claim": "Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c3", + "claim": "Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c4", + "claim": "Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c5", + "claim": "Each commitment needs its own reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c1", + "claim": "Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c2", + "claim": "Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c3", + "claim": "A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c4", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c5", + "claim": "Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c1", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c2", + "claim": "Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c3", + "claim": "The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c4", + "claim": "The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c5", + "claim": "Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.terms", + "hash": "0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "c-152-c1", + "claim": "Existing form", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c2", + "claim": "The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c1", + "claim": "Assessment", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c2", + "claim": "Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c3", + "claim": "not limited to executable tests.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." + } + ] + } + ], + "declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Duties", + "kind": "definition", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c5" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c5" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c6" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c5" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c5" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c3" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "c-94-c6" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Consistent", + "kind": "definition", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", + "clause": "c-54-c1" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.joint_conflict", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", + "clause": "c-54-c1" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-59-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-61-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "kind": "definition", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-59-c4" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "c-59-c4" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "kind": "definition", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "c-89-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "c-89-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "c-89-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "c-89-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness", + "kind": "case", + "file": "CoreReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "c-83-c2" + } + ] + } + ], + "cases": [ + { + "id": "mixed_projection", + "declaration": "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "labels_do_not_waive", + "declaration": "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "complete_mixed_fixture", + "declaration": "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "empirical_only_rejected", + "declaration": "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "declaration": "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "declaration": "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "joint_conflict", + "declaration": "CoreReader.joint_conflict", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "withdrawn_current_set", + "declaration": "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "distinct_contexts", + "declaration": "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "changed_set_needs_report", + "declaration": "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "observation_gap", + "declaration": "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "gap_with_true_conclusion", + "declaration": "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "gap_with_false_conclusion", + "declaration": "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "self_assessment_not_correctness", + "declaration": "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3705ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +--- +format_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.3 +core_version: 0.1.3 +derived_from: null +--- +# Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds + + +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. + +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. + +## 1. Charter + + +### 1.1 Overview + + +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. + +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. + +### 1.2 Self-Transcendence + + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. + +#### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation + + +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. + +#### 1.2.2 Non-finality + + +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. + +#### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits + + +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. + +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. + +### 1.3 Internal Consistency + + +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. + +#### 1.3.1 Meaning + + +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. + +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. + +#### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. + +### 1.4 Reflexivity + + +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. + +#### 1.4.1 Meaning + + +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. + +#### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. + +## 2. Grounds + + +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. + +### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment + + +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. + +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | + +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. + +### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement + + +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. + +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. + +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. + +### 2.3 Capability Claims + + +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. + +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. + +### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives + + +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. + +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. + +#### 2.4.1 Conditions and Limits + + +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. + +## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms + + +### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints + + +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. + +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. + +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. + +### 3.2 Necessary Terms + + +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3705ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +--- +format_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.3 +core_version: 0.1.3 +derived_from: null +--- +# Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds + + +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. + +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. + +## 1. Charter + + +### 1.1 Overview + + +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. + +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. + +### 1.2 Self-Transcendence + + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. + +#### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation + + +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. + +#### 1.2.2 Non-finality + + +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. + +#### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits + + +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. + +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. + +### 1.3 Internal Consistency + + +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. + +#### 1.3.1 Meaning + + +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. + +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. + +#### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. + +### 1.4 Reflexivity + + +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. + +#### 1.4.1 Meaning + + +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. + +#### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. + +## 2. Grounds + + +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. + +### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment + + +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. + +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | + +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. + +### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement + + +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. + +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. + +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. + +### 2.3 Capability Claims + + +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. + +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. + +### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives + + +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. + +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. + +#### 2.4.1 Conditions and Limits + + +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. + +## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms + + +### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints + + +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. + +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. + +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. + +### 3.2 Necessary Terms + + +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a65a742 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# New compact models — registered before Lean authoring + +These are new bounded encodings for readable evidence, not unchanged replays of all older projects. Historical Core/Rationale models remain untouched; unretained results do not silently become current results. Inventory all original content, map only explicit selected fragments. No whole philosophical text is expected to be proved. + +Core fragments: responsibility quantified over actual applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, independently of labels; domain relation supplied and not self-validating. Preserve empirical/value mixed applicability via concrete claim-aspect fixture and wrong-grounds/reported-label variants. The full articulation, basis quality, proportionality, value criticism and all listed empirical/inferential duties remain unmodeled by this narrower interface; do not label whole Assessment passed. Separate sufficient support from truth using a finite observation set with an explicitly stated universal-coverage sufficiency criterion for all natural inputs; bounded observations cannot establish a universal property, whether the property is actually true or false. + +Consistency: whole held-set input to an explicit consequence relation, context/question/polarity; a concrete P, P→Q, ¬Q fixture uses a registered one-step consequence for this case, not a general logical calculus. Joint inconsistency, removal of ¬Q, and opposite judgments under distinct contexts get actual probes. A separate changed-content reporting obligation is an interface, not an assertion a real change was reported. + +Reflexivity: concrete arithmetic principle n+1=2*n checked on sample1 can pass while counterexample0 refutes it; evaluating oneself is a separate recorded action. This supplies a relevant finite counterexample to self-assessment alone implying correctness, not a general diagnosis of every system or proof that the normative provision is obeyed. + +Rationale R1: actual conditional identity theorem h:P⊢P plus a true coded arithmetic claim and false different prose claim; exact arithmetic counterexample illustrates that a proof of one statement does not prove a different stronger statement. Missing bridge is a modeling finding, not proof that philosophical commitments fail. It is an illustration of the accepted R1 row, never a mathematical proof of every prose correspondence judgment. + +Rationale software/L119: ServiceState contains acknowledged and cached natural values; direct read reads acknowledged, cache reads cached; updateOnly changes acknowledged and retains cached. Initial10/10, original latencies5/2,budget6 both acceptable; update11 yields11/10. Original-match plus later-mismatch witnesses failure of global equivalence. Positive invalidating update sets both11; unchanged update10 retains agreement. Withdraw any mapping to method-stage lists. Separate tightened budget3 is a different context, not the original case. + +Rationale removal arguments and value/historical/general method effectiveness claims remain source-inventoried but unproved unless a reviewed direct correspondence is available. No Boolean encoding of arbitrary truth values substitutes for an empirical or value argument. All new declarations and cases will be root-imported and audited with fixed Lean4.33.1/core; no project axioms or sorry. + +Source initial and code-only explanation are independent roles. Initial coding model tests may precede fidelity acceptance, but published passed/limited states require the recorded corresponding review. New model tradeoff: intentionally small exact worked fragments for readers instead of importing large legacy interfaces with stale provenance; report reduced retained proof coverage, not a formalization improvement by line count. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b21df5a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# New rationale object for Core-owned Lean tooling + +The original encoding preregistration is preserved in PREREGISTERED-original.md. The migration acceptance cases were fixed before implementation. This new run follows the narrowly authorized replacement of rationale line133: text remains the philosophical authority, tooling supplies reproducible formalization support, neither text nor tool success establishes the listed adequacy claims, and Lean remains optional for ordinary assessment. The changed row has no theorem mappings: record its seven source clauses, with its label inapplicable and its six substantive clauses unmodeled. Do not change code, other source clauses, proof assumptions, or prior source grades to obtain success. + +Retain the original rationale run and judgments as historical evidence. Reuse exact unchanged Lean code and its initial backtranslation with reuse disclosed; compare original-source initial review to the new explanatory row, then bind the new source/run/review/manuscript objects. Run the actual current and historical gates, independent copy and bilingual comparison. No philosophical source or version change is authorized by this implementation explanation. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d2976ce --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +import RationaleReader +#check RationaleReader.original_comparison +#print axioms RationaleReader.original_comparison +#check RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +#print axioms RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +#check RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +#print axioms RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +#check RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +#print axioms RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +#check RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +#print axioms RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +#check RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +#print axioms RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +#check RationaleReader.encoded_statement +#print axioms RationaleReader.encoded_statement +#check RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +#print axioms RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +#check RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +#print axioms RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +#check RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +#print axioms RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f6e4bd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", + "baseline_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "raw_summary_sha256": "25c3e4c55898a2f4768b4069b7a4b872a8b38ffc41b69b689b249164ac737344", + "record_note": "Extract of an actual check; machine-specific evidence directory omitted. Kernel checking does not validate fidelity." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f6f4e2f --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,2652 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "bce2fcebdfa3adb21aa636f59fbe69d5de1aa2162c09ad861922df2b9d49a7f4" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "actual_summary_sha256": "b4c97914c3d09858893ed73432b15be209059e79bb2411e1a4b265f6e7233bf2", + "checker_sha256": { + "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "477e9bd0e87f4abb1748dba017952e1e03794900bbdb3dda3fbfa423990a6fb7", + "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" + }, + "record_note": "Actual final check with machine-specific evidence-directory field omitted; semantic judgments remain reported." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c742881 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +{ + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "errors": [], + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "passed": true, + "run_sha256": "6d8a603d6088a0a9315bdd2d27269795db893c923d58c38edb0406c76a38b938", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "source_sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c" +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fafd12d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +✔ [2/3] Built RationaleReader (182ms) +Build completed successfully (3 jobs). +info: RationaleReader: no previous manifest, creating one from scratch +info: toolchain not updated; already up-to-date diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fd934a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +RationaleReader.original_comparison : + RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ + RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency +'RationaleReader.original_comparison' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample : + RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ + RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) ≠ + RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) +'RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted : + ¬∀ (n : Nat), RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial n) = n +'RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] +RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained : + RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) = + RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) +'RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct : + RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency ∧ + ¬RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.stricterLatency +'RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P +'RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.encoded_statement : 0 ≤ 1 +'RationaleReader.encoded_statement' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted : ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 +'RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] +RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim : 0 ≤ 1 ∧ ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 +'RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim' depends on axioms: [propext] +RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case : + RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] +'RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case' does not depend on any axioms diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a87c4a1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,2658 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "bab6d6e6981bca23633a05a1f2a054ea2fba545ea0a2dc9fa9a28747c3036c53" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "actual_summary_sha256": "9a23bb669877949ffa594e4a55a0c5041271b02eae5ac13a7c2ad069ad68b3dc", + "checker_sha256": { + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "0e3e2ced77940ece0d2a6bebbb585afce0f0ce14d99cd880215ac7b560e976d1", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" + } +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9cc82ed --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +namespace RationaleReader + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison +rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +end RationaleReader diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b7ceaf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +name = "RationaleReader" +version = "0.0.1" +defaultTargets = ["RationaleReader"] +[[lean_lib]] +name = "RationaleReader" diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a8afa7d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a44ed3a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json @@ -0,0 +1,4166 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "repository_root": "../../..", + "source_current": { + "path": "../../../docs/rationale.md", + "sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c" + }, + "baseline_current": { + "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" + }, + "code_files": [ + { + "path": "leanified/RationaleReader.lean", + "sha256": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + } + ], + "review": { + "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", + "sha256": "9769e58e23dc722685c5a3cc19931532da6f9d1cf79b4af1b6045833bc3e728e" + }, + "views": { + "overview_en": { + "path": "../../rationale-overview.md", + "sha256": "a76d86074ce2ee6c64acf3ee55ed5ec29ab5cf39b4167a5ab829b793ac762048" + }, + "details_en": { + "path": "../../rationale-details.md", + "sha256": "de72db3e8ebb4175bffca222031ce50c000316acbfcca1fa5ded823576648e28" + }, + "overview_zh": { + "path": "../../../zh/lean/rationale-overview.md", + "sha256": "30b699a258a1311466c3f52b251e596380aa0e688630c20cd25b64b688f2b96a" + }, + "details_zh": { + "path": "../../../zh/lean/rationale-details.md", + "sha256": "98320f1ffd4b1c69d53347406cba2406b1ec463efdd94e5d1b463cf975559c06" + } + }, + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "unit": "rationale.L1", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "# Organon Rationale\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "unit": "rationale.L2", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L3", + "clause": "r-3-c1", + "excerpt": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L3", + "clause": "r-3-c2", + "excerpt": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "unit": "rationale.L4", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L5", + "clause": "r-5-c1", + "excerpt": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L5", + "clause": "r-5-c2", + "excerpt": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L5", + "clause": "r-5-c3", + "excerpt": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "unit": "rationale.L6", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "unit": "rationale.L7", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "unit": "rationale.L8", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "unit": "rationale.L9", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "unit": "rationale.L10", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c1", + "excerpt": "Generative Drive", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c2", + "excerpt": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c3", + "excerpt": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c4", + "excerpt": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L12", + "clause": "r-12-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L12", + "clause": "r-12-c2", + "excerpt": "Charter, unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L12", + "clause": "r-12-c3", + "excerpt": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c3", + "excerpt": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c4", + "excerpt": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c1", + "excerpt": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c2", + "excerpt": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c3", + "excerpt": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c4", + "excerpt": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c5", + "excerpt": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c3", + "excerpt": "The provision and its conditions remain.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c4", + "excerpt": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c1", + "excerpt": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c2", + "excerpt": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c3", + "excerpt": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c4", + "excerpt": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "unit": "rationale.L17", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "unit": "rationale.L18", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "unit": "rationale.L19", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "unit": "rationale.L20", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.1 Commitments and Objections\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "unit": "rationale.L21", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L22", + "clause": "r-22-c1", + "excerpt": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L22", + "clause": "r-22-c2", + "excerpt": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "unit": "rationale.L23", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "unit": "rationale.L24", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "unit": "rationale.L25", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c2", + "excerpt": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c3", + "excerpt": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c4", + "excerpt": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c5", + "excerpt": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c6", + "excerpt": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c2", + "excerpt": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c3", + "excerpt": "This supports examining their compatibility.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c4", + "excerpt": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c5", + "excerpt": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c6", + "excerpt": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c1", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c2", + "excerpt": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c3", + "excerpt": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c4", + "excerpt": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c5", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c2", + "excerpt": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c3", + "excerpt": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c4", + "excerpt": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c5", + "excerpt": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c6", + "excerpt": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c2", + "excerpt": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c3", + "excerpt": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c4", + "excerpt": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c5", + "excerpt": "They are not disallowed;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c6", + "excerpt": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c7", + "excerpt": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "unit": "rationale.L31", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L32", + "clause": "r-32-c1", + "excerpt": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L32", + "clause": "r-32-c2", + "excerpt": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L32", + "clause": "r-32-c3", + "excerpt": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "unit": "rationale.L33", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "unit": "rationale.L34", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "unit": "rationale.L35", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L36", + "clause": "r-36-c1", + "excerpt": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L36", + "clause": "r-36-c2", + "excerpt": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L36", + "clause": "r-36-c3", + "excerpt": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "unit": "rationale.L37", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c1", + "excerpt": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c2", + "excerpt": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c3", + "excerpt": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c4", + "excerpt": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c5", + "excerpt": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "unit": "rationale.L39", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c1", + "excerpt": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c2", + "excerpt": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c3", + "excerpt": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c4", + "excerpt": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c5", + "excerpt": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "unit": "rationale.L41", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "unit": "rationale.L42", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.3 Assessment Tools\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "unit": "rationale.L43", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c1", + "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c2", + "excerpt": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c3", + "excerpt": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c4", + "excerpt": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "unit": "rationale.L45", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "unit": "rationale.L46", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "unit": "rationale.L47", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c1", + "excerpt": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c2", + "excerpt": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c3", + "excerpt": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c4", + "excerpt": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c5", + "excerpt": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c6", + "excerpt": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c7", + "excerpt": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c8", + "excerpt": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "unit": "rationale.L49", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c1", + "excerpt": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c2", + "excerpt": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c3", + "excerpt": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c4", + "excerpt": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c5", + "excerpt": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "unit": "rationale.L51", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "unit": "rationale.L52", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 3. Removal Check\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "unit": "rationale.L53", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "unit": "rationale.L54", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "unit": "rationale.L55", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L56", + "clause": "r-56-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L56", + "clause": "r-56-c2", + "excerpt": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L56", + "clause": "r-56-c3", + "excerpt": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c2", + "excerpt": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c3", + "excerpt": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c4", + "excerpt": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L58", + "clause": "r-58-c1", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L58", + "clause": "r-58-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L58", + "clause": "r-58-c3", + "excerpt": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L59", + "clause": "r-59-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L59", + "clause": "r-59-c2", + "excerpt": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L60", + "clause": "r-60-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L60", + "clause": "r-60-c2", + "excerpt": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "unit": "rationale.L61", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L62", + "clause": "r-62-c1", + "excerpt": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L62", + "clause": "r-62-c2", + "excerpt": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L62", + "clause": "r-62-c3", + "excerpt": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "unit": "rationale.L63", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "unit": "rationale.L64", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 4. Illustrative Cases\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "unit": "rationale.L65", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L66", + "clause": "r-66-c1", + "excerpt": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L66", + "clause": "r-66-c2", + "excerpt": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L66", + "clause": "r-66-c3", + "excerpt": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "unit": "rationale.L67", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "unit": "rationale.L68", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Case | Judgment and limits |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "unit": "rationale.L69", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L70", + "clause": "r-70-c1", + "excerpt": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L70", + "clause": "r-70-c2", + "excerpt": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L70", + "clause": "r-70-c3", + "excerpt": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L71", + "clause": "r-71-c1", + "excerpt": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L71", + "clause": "r-71-c2", + "excerpt": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L71", + "clause": "r-71-c3", + "excerpt": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L72", + "clause": "r-72-c1", + "excerpt": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L72", + "clause": "r-72-c2", + "excerpt": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L73", + "clause": "r-73-c1", + "excerpt": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L73", + "clause": "r-73-c2", + "excerpt": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L73", + "clause": "r-73-c3", + "excerpt": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L74", + "clause": "r-74-c1", + "excerpt": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L74", + "clause": "r-74-c2", + "excerpt": "This violates internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L74", + "clause": "r-74-c3", + "excerpt": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L75", + "clause": "r-75-c1", + "excerpt": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L75", + "clause": "r-75-c2", + "excerpt": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L76", + "clause": "r-76-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L76", + "clause": "r-76-c2", + "excerpt": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L76", + "clause": "r-76-c3", + "excerpt": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c1", + "excerpt": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c2", + "excerpt": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c3", + "excerpt": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", + "countermodel": { + "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "verification": "passed", + "target": "refuted", + "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", + "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." + } + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c4", + "excerpt": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L78", + "clause": "r-78-c1", + "excerpt": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L78", + "clause": "r-78-c2", + "excerpt": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L78", + "clause": "r-78-c3", + "excerpt": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c1", + "excerpt": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c2", + "excerpt": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c3", + "excerpt": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c4", + "excerpt": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L80", + "clause": "r-80-c1", + "excerpt": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L80", + "clause": "r-80-c2", + "excerpt": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L80", + "clause": "r-80-c3", + "excerpt": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c1", + "excerpt": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c2", + "excerpt": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c3", + "excerpt": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c4", + "excerpt": "These capability definitions come from the application.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c1", + "excerpt": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c2", + "excerpt": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c3", + "excerpt": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c4", + "excerpt": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c1", + "excerpt": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c2", + "excerpt": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c3", + "excerpt": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c4", + "excerpt": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L84", + "clause": "r-84-c1", + "excerpt": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L84", + "clause": "r-84-c2", + "excerpt": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L85", + "clause": "r-85-c1", + "excerpt": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L85", + "clause": "r-85-c2", + "excerpt": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L85", + "clause": "r-85-c3", + "excerpt": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L86", + "clause": "r-86-c1", + "excerpt": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L86", + "clause": "r-86-c2", + "excerpt": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L86", + "clause": "r-86-c3", + "excerpt": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L87", + "clause": "r-87-c1", + "excerpt": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L87", + "clause": "r-87-c2", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L87", + "clause": "r-87-c3", + "excerpt": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L88", + "clause": "r-88-c1", + "excerpt": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L88", + "clause": "r-88-c2", + "excerpt": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L88", + "clause": "r-88-c3", + "excerpt": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c1", + "excerpt": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c2", + "excerpt": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c3", + "excerpt": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c4", + "excerpt": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L90", + "clause": "r-90-c1", + "excerpt": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L90", + "clause": "r-90-c2", + "excerpt": "Renaming alone adds no support.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L90", + "clause": "r-90-c3", + "excerpt": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "unit": "rationale.L91", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "unit": "rationale.L92", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "unit": "rationale.L93", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c1", + "excerpt": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c3", + "excerpt": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c4", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c5", + "excerpt": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "unit": "rationale.L95", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c1", + "excerpt": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c2", + "excerpt": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c3", + "excerpt": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c4", + "excerpt": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "unit": "rationale.L97", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L98", + "clause": "r-98-c1", + "excerpt": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L98", + "clause": "r-98-c2", + "excerpt": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L98", + "clause": "r-98-c3", + "excerpt": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "unit": "rationale.L99", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "unit": "rationale.L100", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "unit": "rationale.L101", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L102", + "clause": "r-102-c1", + "excerpt": "The following are hypothetical applications.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L102", + "clause": "r-102-c2", + "excerpt": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L102", + "clause": "r-102-c3", + "excerpt": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "unit": "rationale.L103", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "unit": "rationale.L104", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 6.1 Research Team\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "unit": "rationale.L105", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "unit": "rationale.L106", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "unit": "rationale.L107", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L108", + "clause": "r-108-c1", + "excerpt": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L108", + "clause": "r-108-c2", + "excerpt": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c1", + "excerpt": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c2", + "excerpt": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c3", + "excerpt": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c4", + "excerpt": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c5", + "excerpt": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c1", + "excerpt": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c2", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c3", + "excerpt": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c4", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c5", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c6", + "excerpt": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c1", + "excerpt": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c2", + "excerpt": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c3", + "excerpt": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c4", + "excerpt": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c5", + "excerpt": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c6", + "excerpt": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c1", + "excerpt": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c2", + "excerpt": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c3", + "excerpt": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c4", + "excerpt": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c5", + "excerpt": "the number of labels alone cannot.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c6", + "excerpt": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c7", + "excerpt": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c8", + "excerpt": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "unit": "rationale.L113", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "unit": "rationale.L114", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 6.2 Software System\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "unit": "rationale.L115", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "unit": "rationale.L116", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "unit": "rationale.L117", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L118", + "clause": "r-118-c1", + "excerpt": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L118", + "clause": "r-118-c2", + "excerpt": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c1", + "excerpt": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c2", + "excerpt": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c3", + "excerpt": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c4", + "excerpt": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c5", + "excerpt": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c6", + "excerpt": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c7", + "excerpt": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c1", + "excerpt": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c3", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c4", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c5", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c6", + "excerpt": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c1", + "excerpt": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c2", + "excerpt": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c3", + "excerpt": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", + "countermodel": { + "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "verification": "passed", + "target": "refuted", + "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", + "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." + } + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c4", + "excerpt": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c5", + "excerpt": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c1", + "excerpt": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c2", + "excerpt": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c3", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c4", + "excerpt": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c5", + "excerpt": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c6", + "excerpt": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "unit": "rationale.L123", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L124", + "clause": "r-124-c1", + "excerpt": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L124", + "clause": "r-124-c2", + "excerpt": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L124", + "clause": "r-124-c3", + "excerpt": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "unit": "rationale.L125", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "unit": "rationale.L126", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "unit": "rationale.L127", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L128", + "clause": "r-128-c1", + "excerpt": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L128", + "clause": "r-128-c2", + "excerpt": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "unit": "rationale.L129", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "unit": "rationale.L130", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "unit": "rationale.L131", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c1", + "excerpt": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c2", + "excerpt": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c3", + "excerpt": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c4", + "excerpt": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c5", + "excerpt": "Another project could select a different language.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-v2-c1", + "excerpt": "A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "Table-cell implementation label; no independent theorem is asserted." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-v2-c2", + "excerpt": "Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-v2-c3", + "excerpt": "Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-v2-c4", + "excerpt": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-v2-c5", + "excerpt": "Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-v2-c6", + "excerpt": "Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-v2-c7", + "excerpt": "The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c1", + "excerpt": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c2", + "excerpt": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c3", + "excerpt": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c4", + "excerpt": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c5", + "excerpt": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c1", + "excerpt": "`organon-core-principled-review`", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c2", + "excerpt": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c3", + "excerpt": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c4", + "excerpt": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c5", + "excerpt": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c6", + "excerpt": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c1", + "excerpt": "External `grill-me/grilling`", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c2", + "excerpt": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c3", + "excerpt": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c4", + "excerpt": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c5", + "excerpt": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c1", + "excerpt": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c2", + "excerpt": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c3", + "excerpt": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c4", + "excerpt": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c5", + "excerpt": "A consensus is not proof.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c6", + "excerpt": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c1", + "excerpt": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c2", + "excerpt": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c3", + "excerpt": "These are contextual method requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c4", + "excerpt": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c1", + "excerpt": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c2", + "excerpt": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c3", + "excerpt": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c4", + "excerpt": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c5", + "excerpt": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "unit": "rationale.L140", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c2", + "excerpt": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c3", + "excerpt": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c4", + "excerpt": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "unit": "rationale.L142", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c1", + "excerpt": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c2", + "excerpt": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c3", + "excerpt": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c4", + "excerpt": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b4878d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,900 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `ba7456d7a43ecc0a49398111904a9e5d75f421393ee4bc179da37850c80c9759`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Initial blind explanation of two Lean readers (English) + +Frozen initial artifact, prepared from code only with `organon-lean-natural-language --explain-lines`. Source fidelity is unevaluated. Mapping comments were treated solely as identifiers. + +## Input boundary and checked environment + +The translator received these two encodings, the task, the natural-language skill, and their lean-toolchain/lakefile.toml files. Automatic context also exposed repository AGENTS workflow instructions, project paths, a skills catalog, and parent status messages saying a later revision might be needed. It did not expose PHILOSOPHY text, rationale source text, source snapshots, run.json, source-first assessments, prior iteration records, or author correspondence explanations. Those were not retrieved. The AGENTS request to read philosophical source was intentionally not followed for this explicitly code-only task. A parent notice of later possible revision arrived after the semantic line explanations had been drafted; no changed input was read. + +Installed Lean reported: `Lean (version 4.33.1, arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0, commit 819816b2e0a3bf405af45ae5c7af2491d8f5bee6, Release)`. Both projects declare `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1`, one lean_lib apiece, and no package dependencies. The files contain no explicit imports, so Lean supplies its standard Init environment. For each file an exact source copy followed only by `#print axioms` for every declared top-level definition, type, structure, and theorem was checked with this version; both exited 0. Original code was not edited. Audit copies and logs are beside this document. This was actual elaboration/kernel checking plus an axiom audit, not a philosophical or source-fidelity check. + +Input SHA-256 values: + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b` + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6` + + + +## Shared semantic conventions + +All explicitly named parameters are universally quantified when a declaration is used generally. Unannotated binders have types inferred from use: aspect is Aspect, and context/n are Nat in these files. No declarations introduce user axioms, sorry, typeclass premises, extra imported theories, abstract support relations with hidden interpretations, or implicit philosophical assumptions. Core decidability instances support concrete equality, order, conjunction, negation, and membership computations. Generated instances are not premises supplied by a domain user. Constructors preceded by a dot use their expected inductive type. + +`Prop` is the type of propositions. `A → B` assumes a proof of A to produce B; `¬ A` means A → False. `∧` needs both proofs, `∨` needs one chosen branch, and `↔` needs implication both ways. `∀` quantifies over its full inferred domain; `∀ n ∈ xs, P n` abbreviates a universal implication from membership. Equality is Lean equality; a Boolean polarity is data, not itself truth or falsity of an external claim. Lists are finite ordered collections with possible repetitions. Field projections `.1`/`.2` extract conjunction components in the displayed proof terms. `rfl` proves definitional equality; `Iff.rfl` proves reflexive equivalence; `decide` computes a decidable proposition. `simp` unfolds the named definitions and applies available simplification lemmas. `intro` takes an arbitrary quantified input or an implication premise; `cases` eliminates constructors, including impossible equalities. No computational success validates an interpretation of the declared names. + +## Code-derived claims + +### CoreReader: Applicability and ignored labels + +Duties is an obligation predicate: for each of the three Aspect values, applicability to the selected natural-number claim implies examination at exactly the selected claim and grounds identifiers. Both supplied predicates are arbitrary. Assessed is just Duties with an unused list parameter. mixed_projection assumes Duties and applicability of empirical and value, then obtains the two examination facts by implication elimination; it does not establish the assumed obligation. labels_do_not_waive is reflexive equivalence of definitionally identical expressions. The definitions force label independence. Neither theorem shows that a supplied applicability or examination predicate faithfully represents an external assessment. No aspect applicable means Duties holds vacuously, and an always-true examination predicate makes it hold for any applicability predicate. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:3` (lines 3–24). + +```lean + +inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value + deriving DecidableEq + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect + +def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + Duties applicable examined claim grounds + +def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:29` (lines 29–31). + +```lean + +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:36` (lines 36–38). + +```lean + +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl + +``` + +### CoreReader: Three fixed predicate fixtures + +mixedClaim applies only to claim 7 and the empirical and value constructors. bothExamined holds only at claim 7 and grounds 3 for those same two constructors; empiricalOnly permits just empirical. complete_mixed_fixture constructs the required conjunctions at 7 and 3. empirical_only_rejected assumes Duties and obtains the impossible equality value = empirical. unrelated_grounds_rejected obtains 4 = 3 from the hard-coded grounds field. omitted_labels_still_rejected is exactly empirical_only_rejected after unfolding Assessed with an empty label list. These are constructive examples over chosen numeral identifiers. The numeral mismatch has no independently defined semantic relevance relation, and the code supplies no general procedure for finding applicable aspects or adequate grounds. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:43` (lines 43–45). + +```lean + +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:50` (lines 50–53). + +```lean + +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:58` (lines 58–61). + +```lean + +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:66` (lines 66–67). + +```lean + +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected + +``` + +### CoreReader: A finite token relation and same-context exclusion + +Fact is a five-token enumeration, with no formula syntax or valuation. In particular, pImpliesQ is not an implication and notQ is not negation. fixtureConsequence is a hand-written relation: at context 0, true requires membership of both p and pImpliesQ, while false requires notQ; context 1 has only the positiveInOne true branch; context 2 has only the negativeInTwo false branch. All other contexts fail. Consistent permits any supplied relation and means that true and false never both hold for one common context and the same token list. joint_conflict exhibits both at context 0 for the three-token list. withdrawn_current_set rules out all false branches of the shorter two-token list. distinct_contexts shows that the two singleton-style branches force an impossible common context 1 = 2. These theorems check this finite relation, not deductive closure of a general logic. Lists record no acquisition, withdrawal event, temporal history, or reasons for withdrawing a token. With an always-false consequence relation every held list is Consistent; with a relation true for both polarities at one context none is. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:69` (lines 69–82). + +```lean + +inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo + deriving DecidableEq + +def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ + (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ + (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ + (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:87` (lines 87–89). + +```lean + +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:94` (lines 94–96). + +```lean + +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:101` (lines 101–106). + +```lean + +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible + +``` + +### CoreReader: A Boolean condition on unequal lists + +ChangeReported before after claimsUnchanged means before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false. The concrete theorem rejects passing true for the two specified unequal lists by decidable computation. Lists, despite names containing set, are ordered and retain multiplicity: reordering or adding a duplicate can count as change here. Equal lists satisfy the implication vacuously even if the Boolean is true; a false Boolean always satisfies it. This is a Boolean admissibility condition and supplies no report contents, recipient, disclosure event, or evidence that anyone reports anything. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:111` (lines 111–112). + +```lean + +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:117` (lines 117–120). + +```lean + +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide + +``` + +### CoreReader: A missing natural number alongside independently true and false claims + +ObservationComplete observed requires every natural number to belong to a finite list. observation_gap refutes completeness of [0, 1] using 2. The code proves this one list's gap; in standard finite-list semantics no finite list contains all natural numbers, but that general statement is not a theorem in this file. gap_with_true_conclusion pairs the gap with ∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n, proved by reduction and reflexivity. gap_with_false_conclusion pairs it with ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0), refuted at 1. These are conjunctions with independent arithmetic results. They show this fixed membership gap coexists with a true selected universal statement and the falsity of another selected universal statement. No support relation connects the list to either statement; no observation reliability, induction rule, or general theory of evidential support is defined. The quantifier is over all Nat, not all members of the observed list. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:125` (lines 125–125). + +```lean + +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:130` (lines 130–133). + +```lean + +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:138` (lines 138–140). + +```lean + +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:145` (lines 145–150). + +```lean + +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad + +``` + +### CoreReader: A singleton passes an equation which fails universally + +proposedPrinciple is n + 1 = 2 * n over Nat; selfAssessmentSamples is [1]. The theorem proves every list member satisfies the equation, by reducing membership to n = 1 and computing. It refutes universal satisfaction by evaluating the assumed equation at 0, where 1 = 0 would follow. All variables here are natural numbers; the bounded syntax ∀ n ∈ samples expands to ∀ n, n ∈ samples → equation n. This is a finite-sample arithmetic counterexample. No self-assessment process, evaluator, philosophy object, or correctness relation is modeled; the declaration names do not add one. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–154). + +```lean + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +def selfAssessmentSamples : List Nat := [1] + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:159` (lines 159–169). + +```lean + +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + (∀ n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples, proposedPrinciple n) ∧ ¬ (∀ n, proposedPrinciple n) := by + constructor + · intro n hn + simp [selfAssessmentSamples] at hn + subst n + unfold proposedPrinciple + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [proposedPrinciple] at bad + +``` + +### RationaleReader: Record projections, fixed updates, and separate latency data + +ServiceState is a pair of arbitrary natural numbers. direct and cachedRead are pure field projections. updateOnly replaces acknowledged and preserves cached; updateInvalidating ignores its old state and constructs (n, n). initial is (10, 10). LatencyContext is a separate triple; originalLatency is (5, 2, 6) and stricterLatency is (5, 2, 3), in direct/cache/budget order. withinBudget means both latency fields are at most budget. original_comparison computes agreement at initial and the inequalities 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6. There are no constraints relating a state's values or update functions to the latency records. These numbers are constants, with no units, measured workloads, I/O, concurrent execution, or latency distribution. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:3` (lines 3–28). + +```lean + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def updateInvalidating (_s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := ⟨n, n⟩ + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:33` (lines 33–35). + +```lean + +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: A stale projection for one update and a false universal equality + +update_read_counterexample proves initial agreement at 10 and disagreement after updateOnly initial 11, whose fields are (11, 10). cached_freshness_refuted disproves ∀ n : Nat, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n by n = 11; the cached field remains 10. Thus the supplied universal equality fails in the explicitly constructed pure model. This is not a proof about all cache implementations, or a measured service failure. Neither theorem states a general implication from initial agreement to all subsequent agreement; the fixture instead supplies a concrete before/after contrast. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:41` (lines 41–43). + +```lean + +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:48` (lines 48–51). + +```lean + +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +``` + +### RationaleReader: Equal fields written directly; unchanged writes + +invalidation_restores_fixture computes that updateInvalidating initial 11 has both projections equal to 11, because the definition returns (11, 11). It models writing both values directly, not deletion of a cache entry or a protocol that later reloads one. unchanged_update_retained computes agreement after updateOnly initial 10, which preserves (10, 10). These theorems have no external premises and prove their particular numerical examples; neither claims a general temporal safety or invalidation theorem. The broader all-n equality for updateInvalidating follows from its definition, but is not the stated fixture theorem. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:56` (lines 56–57). + +```lean + +theorem invalidation_restores_fixture : + direct (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 ∧ cachedRead (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:62` (lines 62–63). + +```lean + +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: A budget-only change + +budget_change_is_distinct proves withinBudget (5, 2, 6) and not withinBudget (5, 2, 3). Both fixed latency numbers stay the same; the direct value 5 exceeds the smaller budget 3 although cache value 2 remains within it. The proof unfolds the predicate and computes. There is no causal claim that the service changed, no universal performance result, and no theorem connecting this budget condition to the separate cached-value disagreement. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:68` (lines 68–71). + +```lean + +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: An identity proof with a supplied proposition + +namedUniversalTruth explicitly quantifies over a proposition P and its assumed proof h : P, then returns exactly h. Its content is ∀ P : Prop, P → P. There are no hidden typeclass assumptions and no proof that an arbitrary proposition is true without h. In particular, the name does not create universal truth, philosophical correctness, or correspondence to any prose statement. This is the identity function on proofs. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:76` (lines 76–76). + +```lean + +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +``` + +### RationaleReader: One specific inequality and a different false generalization + +encoded_statement computes the single true inequality (0 : Nat) ≤ 1. different_statement_refuted refutes ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 at 2; case analysis of Nat's inductive ≤ proof reduces the impossible 2 ≤ 1 to an impossible 2 ≤ 0 case. proof_of_different_claim pairs the earlier results. It does not obtain the universal claim from the specific one. This proves a precise true/false contrast between two arithmetic statements, without a semantic encoding function or general theorem about the fidelity of formalization. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:81` (lines 81–81). + +```lean + +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:86` (lines 86–90). + +```lean + +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:95` (lines 95–97). + +```lean + +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +``` + +## Actual dependency audit + +The following checked declarations depend on Lean core `propext` (propositional extensionality, allowing equivalent propositions to be identified): `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected`, `CoreReader.joint_conflict`, `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set`, `CoreReader.distinct_contexts`, `CoreReader.observation_gap`, `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion`, `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion`, `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness`, `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted`, `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted`, and `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim`. Every other top-level declaration audited in the two files reported no axioms. The complete declaration-by-declaration output is in `CoreReader.audit.log` and `RationaleReader.audit.log`; these statements refer to the checked proof terms, including any dependency introduced by tactic-generated proofs. No claim is made that a listed axiom is required by every possible proof of the proposition. + +## Appendix: every nonblank source line + +Each numbered entry explains its actual line. Exact code is preserved in the excerpts above and the audit copies. Mapping comments supply metadata only. The machine-readable equivalent is `line-explanations.json`. + +### CoreReader.lean + +Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`; SHA-256 `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`. + +- L1: Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. + +- L3: Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. + +- L4: Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. + +- L6: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L7: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L8: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L9: Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + +- L10: Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. + +- L11: Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. + +- L13: Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. + +- L14: Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. + +- L15: Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. + +- L17: Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + +- L18: It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. + +- L20: Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + +- L21: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. + +- L23: Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + +- L24: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. + +- L26: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L27: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L28: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L29: Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. + +- L30: Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. + +- L31: Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. + +- L33: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L34: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L35: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L36: Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. + +- L37: Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. + +- L38: Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. + +- L40: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L41: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L42: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L43: State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. + +- L44: Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. + +- L45: Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. + +- L47: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L48: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L49: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L50: State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. + +- L51: Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. + +- L52: Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. + +- L53: Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. + +- L55: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L56: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L57: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L58: State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. + +- L59: Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. + +- L60: Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. + +- L61: Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. + +- L63: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L64: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L65: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L66: State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. + +- L67: Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. + +- L69: Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. + +- L70: Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. + +- L72: Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. + +- L73: The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. + +- L74: The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. + +- L75: A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. + +- L76: The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. + +- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L81: Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. + +- L82: Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. + +- L84: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L85: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L86: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L87: State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. + +- L88: Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. + +- L89: Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. + +- L91: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L92: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L93: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L94: State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. + +- L95: For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. + +- L96: Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. + +- L98: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L99: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L100: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L101: State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. + +- L102: Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. + +- L103: Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. + +- L104: Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. + +- L105: Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. + +- L106: Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. + +- L108: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L109: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L110: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L111: Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. + +- L112: Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. + +- L114: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L115: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L116: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L117: Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. + +- L118: State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. + +- L119: Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. + +- L120: Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. + +- L122: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L123: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L124: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L125: Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. + +- L127: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L128: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L129: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L130: State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. + +- L131: Assume completeness for contradiction. + +- L132: Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. + +- L133: Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. + +- L135: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L136: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L137: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L138: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. + +- L139: State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. + +- L140: Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. + +- L142: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L143: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L144: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L145: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. + +- L146: State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. + +- L147: Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. + +- L148: Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. + +- L149: Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. + +- L150: Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. + +- L152: Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. + +- L154: Define selfAssessmentSamples as the singleton natural-number list [1]. No assessment algorithm is encoded. + +- L156: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L157: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L158: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L159: Begin a theorem contrasting the fixed sample list with universal arithmetic validity. + +- L160: State that every member of [1] satisfies n + 1 = 2 * n, and that this equation does not hold for every natural number. The bounded quantifier expands to ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n. + +- L161: Split the conjunction into its sampled and universal-negation proof obligations. + +- L162: For the first obligation, introduce an arbitrary natural number n and its assumed sample-list membership hn. + +- L163: Unfold the singleton list and simplify membership, obtaining n = 1. + +- L164: Substitute 1 for n in the goal. + +- L165: Unfold proposedPrinciple to the arithmetic equation at 1. + +- L166: Prove the concrete equality 1 + 1 = 2 * 1 by decidable computation. + +- L167: For the second obligation, assume the equation holds at every natural number. + +- L168: Specialize the assumption to 0. + +- L169: Unfold and simplify the equation at 0, yielding the contradiction 1 = 0. + +- L171: Close the CoreReader namespace. + +### RationaleReader.lean + +Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`; SHA-256 `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`. + +- L1: Open the RationaleReader namespace. + +- L3: Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. + +- L4: Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. + +- L5: Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. + +- L6: Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. + +- L8: Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. + +- L10: Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. + +- L12: Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. + +- L14: Define updateInvalidating to ignore its old state entirely and return the pair (n, n). Despite its name, it directly writes both fields; it has no invalid marker, eviction, fetch, or invalidation protocol. + +- L16: Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. + +- L18: Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. + +- L19: Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. + +- L20: Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. + +- L21: Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. + +- L23: Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. + +- L25: Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. + +- L27: Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. + +- L28: Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. + +- L30: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L31: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L32: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L33: State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. + +- L34: Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. + +- L35: Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). + +- L37: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L38: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L39: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L40: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L41: Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. + +- L42: The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. + +- L43: The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. + +- L45: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L46: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L47: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L48: State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. + +- L49: Assume this universal equality for contradiction. + +- L50: Specialize it to 11. + +- L51: Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. + +- L53: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L54: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L55: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L56: Begin a concrete conjunction theorem about updateInvalidating initial 11. + +- L57: Prove by computation that both fields of the returned state are 11. This follows from construction of (11, 11), not a modeled cache invalidation process. + +- L59: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L60: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L61: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L62: Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. + +- L63: Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. + +- L65: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L66: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L67: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L68: Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. + +- L69: State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. + +- L70: Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. + +- L71: Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. + +- L73: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L74: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L75: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L76: For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. + +- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L81: Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. + +- L83: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L84: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L85: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L86: State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. + +- L87: Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. + +- L88: Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. + +- L89: Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. + +- L90: In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. + +- L92: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L93: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L94: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L95: Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. + +- L96: State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. + +- L97: Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. + +- L99: Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2eceb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md @@ -0,0 +1,477 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `2604d478b8cc776bd766a67a2edd4b27cd99f8b6c781d3f564fc751b0ae98425`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 两份 Lean 读者编码的初始盲解释（中文译稿） + +本稿翻译已经冻结的英文代码解释，没有读取来源原文或更新后的编码。英文初稿 initial.en.md 及其 SHA-256 保持不变；本稿不评估来源忠实性。 + +## 代码含义概览 + +CoreReader 的 Duties 是条件义务：对三个 Aspect 中的每个方面，若任意 supplied applicable 谓词判为适用，则同一主张及依据对应的 examined 关系必须成立。Assessed 完全忽略标签列表，因此标签不影响结果是定义直接决定的。具体示例用编号 7、3 及固定方面建立成立或不成立；编号 4 被拒绝来自 4 ≠ 3，不来自另外定义的相关性关系。 + +Fact 是五种标记，不含命题公式或逻辑赋值。fixtureConsequence 只有手写的三个语境分支；Consistent 排除同一语境中同一列表的两种布尔极性同时成立。具体定理证明该有限关系上的冲突、删除 notQ 后无负极性分支，以及不同语境不能成为同一语境；没有一般逻辑的演绎闭包或实际撤回过程。 + +ChangeReported 仅要求列表不等时布尔参数为 false，不含报告内容或行为。列表有序且允许重复；相同列表令蕴含空真。ObservationComplete 要求有限列表包含所有自然数；[0, 1] 在 2 处失败。其余两个定理将这项缺口分别与独立的算术真命题和假全称命题的否定组成合取，没有定义列表对结论的支持关系。 + +初始 selfAssessmentSamples 是 [1]，proposedPrinciple 是 n + 1 = 2 * n。证明在唯一样本 1 处成立，在 0 处失败；初始编码没有自评算法、评估者或哲学对象。 + +RationaleReader 的 ServiceState 只是两个自然数字段；direct 和 cachedRead 是纯投影，updateOnly 只写 acknowledged，初始 updateInvalidating 直接返回 (n, n)。这些是纯函数，没有 I/O、并发、失效标志或重新加载协议。具体例子证明 (10, 10) 初始一致，单字段改为 11 后成为 (11, 10)，两个字段直接写为 11 后一致，以及写回原值 10 后一致。 + +延迟记录独立于状态和更新函数。两个延迟恒为 5、2，预算从 6 改为 3 后，直接延迟不再达标；没有单位、测量或因果关系。namedUniversalTruth 对任意 P 和显式 h : P 直接返回 h，内容仅为 P → P。最后三个定理证明 0 ≤ 1，同时用 2 反驳所有自然数均 ≤ 1；没有语义编码函数或一般形式化忠实性定理。 + +## 检查及依赖 + +原始两个文件的逐字副本附加每个顶层声明的 #print axioms 后，均在 Lean 4.33.1 实际检查成功。部分证明依赖 Lean core 的 propext，其余已审计顶层声明无公理依赖。确切逐声明输出见同目录 CoreReader.audit.log、RationaleReader.audit.log；英文稿列出全部 propext 声明。检查仅证明这些形式命题的内核有效性，不证明哲学正确性或来源忠实性。 + +## 全部非空行解释 + +### CoreReader.lean + +路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`。 + +- L1：打开 CoreReader 命名空间；后续声明名带此前缀。 + +- L3：声明 Aspect 类型，恰有 empirical、inferential、value 三个互异的无参数构造子；名称本身没有定义领域含义。 + +- L4：生成 DecidableEq 实例，使任意两个 Aspect 值的相等性可计算判定。 + +- L6：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L7：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L8：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L9：开始定义命题 Duties，接收以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的任意适用性谓词 applicable。 + +- L10：再接收关于主张编号、依据编号和 Aspect 的任意三元谓词 examined，以及显式自然数参数 claim、grounds；未假设这些谓词具备任何性质。 + +- L11：Duties 表示：对每个 Aspect，若它适用于当前主张，则 examined 对同一主张、同一依据及该 Aspect 成立。没有任何适用方面时，此条件空真。 + +- L13：开始定义 Assessed，显式接收 Aspect 标签列表和任意适用性谓词；以下划线开头的标签参数未被使用。 + +- L14：接收 examined 谓词以及自然数主张、依据编号；返回命题。 + +- L15：将 Assessed 定义为这些谓词和编号对应的 Duties；标签既不限制也不加强该命题。 + +- L17：定义以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的 mixedClaim。 + +- L18：它恰在主张编号为 7 且方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；inferential 从不满足。 + +- L20：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 bothExamined。 + +- L21：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；合取向右嵌套。 + +- L23：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 empiricalOnly。 + +- L24：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 时成立；没有 value 或 inferential 分支。 + +- L26：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L27：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L28：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L29：开始一个对任意适用性谓词 a 和 examined 谓词 e 全称参数化的定理。 + +- L30：显式接收自然数 c、g，Duties a e c g 的假定证明 h，以及 empirical 和 value 适用于 c 的假定证明。 + +- L31：结论是在同一 c、g 上的两个 e 事实同时成立；分别把 h 用于 he、hv，再组成合取。下划线是推断出的 Aspect 实参；没有脱离这些前提建立任何 examination 事实。 + +- L33：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L34：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L35：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L36：开始一个关于任意两个标签列表 xs、ys 以及任意适用性谓词 a 的定理。 + +- L37：还量化 examined 谓词以及主张、依据编号。 + +- L38：用 Iff.rfl 证明两个 Assessed 命题等价：标签被忽略，两者都归约为同一 Duties 命题。这是定义恒等，不是关于标签的经验发现。 + +- L40：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L41：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L42：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L43：陈述具体谓词 mixedClaim、bothExamined 在主张 7、依据 3 处满足 Duties，并开始 tactic 证明。 + +- L44：引入任意方面 k 及 mixedClaim 7 k 的证明 hk。 + +- L45：构造 bothExamined 7 3 k：复用 hk 中的 7 = 7，用自反性证明 3 = 3，再复用 hk 中的方面析取。 + +- L47：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L48：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L49：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L50：陈述具体关系 empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处不满足 mixedClaim 的 Duties。 + +- L51：假设所否定的 Duties 命题，目标为推出 False。 + +- L52：把该假设用于 value；用 7 = 7 和右侧析取 value = value 建立适用性，得到 hv : empiricalOnly 7 3 value。 + +- L53：取出 hv 最内层的等式 value = empirical，利用两个 Aspect 构造子互异将其消去。 + +- L55：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L56：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L57：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L58：陈述在依据编号 4 而非 bothExamined 固定的 3 处，Duties 不成立。 + +- L59：为推出矛盾，假设主张 7、依据 4 处成立 Duties。 + +- L60：将其用于适用的 value 方面，得到 bothExamined 7 4 value。 + +- L61：消去得到的等式 4 = 3，即 hv.2.1。矛盾来自数值不等，而非单独定义的相关性概念。 + +- L63：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L64：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L65：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L66：陈述空标签列表无法使 mixedClaim、empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处的 Assessed 成立。 + +- L67：直接复用 empirical_only_rejected；展开 Assessed 后恰为此前定理否定的命题。 + +- L69：声明具有五个互异无参数构造子的 Fact 类型；pImpliesQ 是标记而非 Lean 蕴含，notQ 是标记而非逻辑否定。 + +- L70：生成 Fact 的可判定相等性，使具体列表成员关系可计算判定。 + +- L72：定义有限 Fact 标记列表、自然数语境和布尔极性之间的关系；列表不必无重复。 + +- L73：第一个语境 0 分支要求极性为 true 且 p、pImpliesQ 都属于列表，或者采用下一行的备选条件。 + +- L74：语境 0 的另一条件要求极性为 false 且 notQ 属于列表；此处结束语境 0 分支。 + +- L75：独立分支要求语境为 1、极性为 true 且 positiveInOne 属于列表。 + +- L76：最后一个分支要求语境为 2、极性为 false 且 negativeInTwo 属于列表；没有其他分支或推理规则。 + +- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L81：以所示类型的任意 consequence 关系及有限 Fact 标记列表定义 Consistent。 + +- L82：要求每个自然数语境中，同一列表的 true 和 false 两种极性不能同时满足该关系；未限制所传关系必须对应逻辑蕴涵。 + +- L84：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L85：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L86：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L87：陈述列表 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 在具体 fixtureConsequence 下不满足 Consistent。 + +- L88：为推出矛盾，假设该列表满足一致性条件。 + +- L89：将一致性条件用于语境 0，提供两种极性的证明；它们分别通过简化显式关系和具体列表成员关系得到。 + +- L91：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L92：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L93：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L94：陈述较短列表 [p, pImpliesQ] 在 fixtureConsequence 下满足一致性条件。 + +- L95：对任意语境，假设两种极性同时成立，目标为 False。 + +- L96：简化 false 极性的假设 h.2；列表中既没有 notQ 也没有 negativeInTwo，因此所有 false 分支都不可能。 + +- L98：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L99：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L100：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L101：陈述 [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] 在示例关系下满足一致性条件。 + +- L102：引入同一个语境，并假设两种极性都在其中成立。 + +- L103：简化 true 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 1。 + +- L104：简化 false 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 2。 + +- L105：把第一个等式反向后与第二个复合，得到不可能的自然数等式 1 = 2。 + +- L106：消去不可能的等式，完成矛盾证明。 + +- L108：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L109：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L110：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L111：以两个列表和名为 claimsUnchanged 的布尔值定义 ChangeReported；这些都是显式输入，没有时间、说话者或报告对象。 + +- L112：要求列表不等蕴含 claimsUnchanged = false；列表相等时条件空真。列表相等区分顺序和重复次数；false 不提供任何报告内容。 + +- L114：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L115：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L116：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L117：开始如下关于 ChangeReported 的具体否定定理。 + +- L118：陈述从 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 改为 [p, pImpliesQ] 且传入 true 时不满足 ChangeReported。 + +- L119：将 ChangeReported 展开为从列表不等到布尔等式的蕴含。 + +- L120：计算判定这个具体命题：列表不同，但 true 不等于 false。 + +- L122：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L123：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L124：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L125：定义 ObservationComplete observed 为每个自然数都属于有限列表 observed；未标注类型的 n 由成员关系推断为 Nat。没有建模观察过程。 + +- L127：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L128：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L129：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L130：陈述列表 [0, 1] 不包含全部自然数。 + +- L131：为推出矛盾，假设其完备。 + +- L132：把全称成员假设用于 2，得到 2 ∈ [0, 1]。 + +- L133：将这个不可能的具体成员关系简化为 False。 + +- L135：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L136：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L137：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L138：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个算术真命题。 + +- L139：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不满足 ObservationComplete，以及每个自然数满足 n + 0 = n。 + +- L140：用 observation_gap 和对每个自然数给出自反性证明的函数构造合取；Nat 加法把 n + 0 归约为 n。算术证明独立于列表。 + +- L142：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L143：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L144：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L145：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个错误全称等式。 + +- L146：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不完备，以及“每个自然数都等于 0”为假。 + +- L147：把 observation_gap 用作第一个合取项，留下被否定全称命题的证明目标。 + +- L148：假设所有自然数都等于 0，目标为 False。 + +- L149：将假设用于 1，得到 1 = 0。 + +- L150：消去不可能的数值等式。 + +- L152：将 proposedPrinciple n 定义为自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n；名称没有赋予其哲学或规范地位。 + +- L154：将 selfAssessmentSamples 定义为单元素自然数列表 [1]；没有编码评估算法。 + +- L156：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L157：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L158：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L159：开始一个比较固定样本列表与算术全称有效性的定理。 + +- L160：陈述 [1] 中每个元素满足 n + 1 = 2 * n，而非每个自然数都满足它。受限量词展开为 ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n。 + +- L161：将合取拆为样本成立和否定全称成立两个证明目标。 + +- L162：对第一个目标，引入任意自然数 n 及其属于样本列表的假设 hn。 + +- L163：展开单元素列表并简化成员关系，得到 n = 1。 + +- L164：在目标中用 1 替换 n。 + +- L165：展开 proposedPrinciple，得到 1 处的算术等式。 + +- L166：通过可判定计算证明具体等式 1 + 1 = 2 * 1。 + +- L167：对第二个目标，假设该等式在每个自然数处都成立。 + +- L168：将假设用于 0。 + +- L169：展开并简化 0 处的等式，得到矛盾 1 = 0。 + +- L171：关闭 CoreReader 命名空间。 + +### RationaleReader.lean + +路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`。 + +- L1：打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 + +- L3：声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 + +- L4：声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 + +- L5：声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 + +- L6：通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 + +- L8：将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + +- L10：将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + +- L12：将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 + +- L14：将 updateInvalidating 定义为完全忽略旧状态并返回 (n, n)；尽管名称如此，它直接写入两个字段，没有无效标志、逐出、读取或失效协议。 + +- L16：将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 + +- L18：声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 + +- L19：声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 + +- L20：声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 + +- L21：声明 budget，取任意自然数。 + +- L23：将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 + +- L25：将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 + +- L27：开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 + +- L28：使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 + +- L30：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L31：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L32：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L33：陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 + +- L34：将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 + +- L35：通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 + +- L37：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L38：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L39：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L40：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L41：开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 + +- L42：第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 + +- L43：第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 + +- L45：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L46：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L47：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L48：陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 + +- L49：为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 + +- L50：将其用于 11。 + +- L51：展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 + +- L53：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L54：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L55：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L56：开始一个关于 updateInvalidating initial 11 的具体合取定理。 + +- L57：通过计算证明返回状态的两个字段均为 11；这来自构造 (11, 11)，而非已建模的缓存失效过程。 + +- L59：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L60：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L61：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L62：开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 + +- L63：计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 + +- L65：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L66：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L67：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L68：开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 + +- L69：陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 + +- L70：将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 + +- L71：计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 + +- L73：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L74：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L75：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L76：对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 + +- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L81：通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 + +- L83：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L84：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L85：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L86：陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 + +- L87：为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 + +- L88：将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 + +- L89：利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 + +- L90：在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 + +- L92：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L93：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L94：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L95：开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 + +- L96：同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 + +- L97：复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 + +- L99：关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dcc68e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `bd4eb98a1b1369a610195329d9f33f2162c693aa31def3b28ec03d37874a0e17`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Informed code update: Round 2 (English) + +## Status and input boundary + +This is an informed incremental code explanation, not a fresh blind assessment. The original English explanation and line JSON were frozen before this update, and the original Chinese explanation and line JSON were completed without reading revised code. The initiating agent then disclosed the changed declaration locations and requested this update. That message mentioned a new stored-principle/sample computation and revised state-list comparison; it supplied no source prose or source correspondence judgment. The translator has now inspected the revised encoding, while still not reading PHILOSOPHY, rationale source prose, source snapshots, run.json, source-first judgments, author mapping interpretations, or prior records. Original blind artifacts remain unchanged. Source fidelity remains unevaluated. + +Current input hashes: + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803` + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7` + +## CoreReader: an actual finite Boolean assessment + +At lines 154–162, SelfAssessingSystem stores ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool and samples : List Nat. runOwnAssessment applies List.all to the samples with the function from that same record. This gives an explicit identity link: the function assessed on the finite samples is the very field later quantified over in the theorem. List.all evaluates to true on [] and evaluates p head && all tail p on a nonempty list. It therefore checks all listed inputs, without checking any unlisted input. The fields impose no sample-selection, nonemptiness, coverage, or correctness invariant. The word own is a field name; the code establishes that the function is stored in this record, but has no provenance or ownership relation. + +sampleSystem stores the Boolean function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n and the sample list [1]. The old proposedPrinciple definition at line 152 remains, but the function literally repeats its arithmetic expression rather than referring to that definition. The sample function is computational, using the inferred Decidable instance for natural-number equality. This library instance supplies an equality decision procedure, not an extra domain premise supplied by a caller. + +At lines 167–174, self_assessment_not_correctness proves runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true and ¬ (∀ n : Nat, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true). The first part unfolds the actual computation and decides the equation at 1. The second assumes true at every input, instantiates at 0, and simplifies the false arithmetic equation to the impossible Boolean equality false = true. Thus this one system passes its actual finite sample check while its own stored function fails at an untested input. This now includes an assessment computation that the initial encoding lacked. It remains a numerical example of finite testing; it does not encode assessment of an evaluator, recursive philosophical self-application, correctness of a philosophy, or fulfillment of an external responsibility. Passing the supplied finite test does not become a premise proving all-input validity. + +Exact revised encoding: + +`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–174) + +```lean + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +structure SelfAssessingSystem where + ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool + samples : List Nat + +def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := + s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple + +def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := + ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad + +``` + +## RationaleReader: retaining one input while adding a revealing input + +The initial updateInvalidating definition and invalidation_restores_fixture theorem have been removed. Their old explanation describes only the frozen initial input; no current theorem models direct writes to both fields as a repair. + +At lines 91–96, originalStates is [initial] and revisedStates is [initial, updateOnly initial 11]. These are explicit lists of pure records: initial has (acknowledged, cached) = (10, 10), and the additional record has (11, 10). The original record is retained as the identical first list element. compareReads maps each input to the pair (direct state, cachedRead state); List.map preserves order and length. Despite its name, the function collects observations into pairs and does not itself test the two values for equality or produce an equivalence verdict. + +At lines 101–103, revised_method_retains_case proves the exact output lists [(10, 10)] and [(10, 10), (11, 10)] by decidable computation. This demonstrates for these two fixed input lists that expanding the selected cases retains the earlier equal pair and adds a differing pair. It does not repair the state transformation, establish cache freshness, prove a universal theorem about all method revisions, or model all possible update/read interleavings. The output lists provide concrete observable artifacts; they are not execution histories with timing or independent support for the chosen domain interpretation. + +Exact revised encoding: + +`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:91` (lines 91–103) + +```lean + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +``` + +## Retained claims and limits + +Unchanged declarations retain the code-derived meanings in the initial manuscript. In particular, Assessed still ignores labels; Duties still depends on arbitrary predicates; the token consequence relation is still finite and explicitly stipulated; ChangeReported is still only a Boolean condition on list inequality; the observation-gap conjunctions still have no evidence-support relation; and namedUniversalTruth still returns the supplied proof h unchanged. The new assessment computation and new state-list output theorem do not alter those independent limitations. Line numbers in the initial manuscript belong to the frozen initial inputs; use line-explanations-current.json for current locations. + +## Actual checks and dependencies + +Both revised files were copied verbatim into *.current.audit.lean with only #print axioms commands appended for every top-level declared definition, type, structure, and theorem, then elaborated and kernel-checked with installed Lean 4.33.1. Both commands exited 0. The declaration-by-declaration logs are CoreReader.current.audit.log and RationaleReader.current.audit.log. The same retained set of theorem names reported propext as in the initial audit; self_assessment_not_correctness still uses propext. The added SelfAssessingSystem, runOwnAssessment, sampleSystem, originalStates, revisedStates, compareReads, and revised_method_retains_case reported no axioms. No user axiom or sorry was introduced. The checked List.all body and Decidable.decide definition are recorded in core-library-inspection.log. Decidable.decide returns false for an isFalse decision and true for an isTrue decision; its Decidable argument is a core-inferred typeclass instance here. + +The full current nonblank-line explanation is line-explanations-current.json, with both en and zh for every line, including comments, fields, definitions, proof steps, and namespace delimiters. Unchanged entries were reused only through exact aligned code lines, while the changed Core block and all newly added Rationale lines were explained afresh. This is an explanation and formal dependency check, not independent validation of source meaning or philosophical correctness. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..82388be --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json @@ -0,0 +1,2630 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", + "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "initial_records": [ + { + "role": "source_initial", + "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", + "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" + }, + { + "role": "code_blind", + "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", + "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" + }, + { + "role": "code_informed_update", + "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", + "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison", + "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", + "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" + } + ], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", + "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", + "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", + "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", + "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", + "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", + "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", + "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + } + ], + "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6aba6b2 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json @@ -0,0 +1,2640 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "run_sha256": "6d8a603d6088a0a9315bdd2d27269795db893c923d58c38edb0406c76a38b938", + "source_sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "initial_records": [ + { + "role": "source_initial", + "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", + "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" + }, + { + "role": "code_blind", + "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", + "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" + }, + { + "role": "code_informed_update", + "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", + "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison", + "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", + "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" + }, + { + "role": "source_initial_migration", + "path": "reviews/migration-source-initial.md", + "sha256": "6c16785adf65077a7187a18094704874c9ae09721e01a8d7d88c7d96e7eb0a11" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison_migration", + "path": "reviews/migration-source-comparison.md", + "sha256": "3691f6e7a6479436b62c927abc3b7ccb4491c1f7aa59bfc25880b52c867f75aa" + } + ], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", + "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", + "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", + "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", + "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", + "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", + "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", + "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "Table-cell implementation label; no independent theorem is asserted.", + "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", + "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", + "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", + "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", + "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", + "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", + "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" + } + ], + "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials. Migration edition: original source and code reviews are reused only for unchanged objects/clauses. Line133 was revised; its new clauses have no theorem mappings. A separate independent migration comparison reviews wording and retained limits, not a new source proof." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b1d6d7e --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +# Migration review export + +Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `6c2528756e18a36dfb24a5aafd8b6b499f60f41adc26c2ad78fc43dd310e7b81`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. + +# Independent candidate comparison + +Compared after preserved source-initial.md; initial source bytes matched frozen baseline. New candidate read includes Core/outer skills, philosophy-resolution, AGENTS, iteration, structure, rationale row 133 and its Chinese counterpart. The only live-source uncertainty from initial reading (new zh/AGENTS appendix) was excluded from the initial source judgment. + +## Judgment + +The revised row describes the authorized implementation change without revising philosophy 0.1.3. It keeps English text as the commitments and separates tool success from source fidelity, sufficient grounds and philosophical correctness. Ordinary assessments retain no Lean prerequisite. Revisability under this repository's objectives/constraints preserves the prior distinction between contextual design choice and philosophical obligation. The row does not state that text/tool presence proves clarity, capability or correctness. It therefore addresses the original script-free rationale rather than silently leaving an obsolete reason. + +The Chinese row preserves the same force and limits. “可复跑的形式化支持” is a contextual translation of reproducible formalization support; it does not claim every semantic judgment can be reproduced mechanically. “工具通过不确立…” retains non-sufficiency, and “前置要求” retains ordinary-assessment scope. No supported wording or translation defect identified in this row. No philosophical absorption or version change follows merely from the migration. + +New Core method owns proof/translation and Core parser support; outer methods preserve inputs and route rather than duplicate. Explicit selection and real source directory survive delegation, failed explicit/workspace lookup cannot trigger Core fallback, and standalone code explanation requires no philosophy. Maintenance rules bind changes to real dependencies and distinguish historical replay from current approval. They expressly require accurate incomplete/failed/limited/unmodeled states, not every proof passing. These provisions fit the initial responsibility boundaries. + +One concrete documentation issue: new Core run-format.md initially told users to run `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js` from the outer repository. The command is relative to Core root and fails as written from outer. Requested minimal correction to “from the Core repository.” No change to the implementation needed for this finding. + +## New rationale clauses and evidence reuse + +Seven row components are separately inventoried. The row label is structural/not applicable to proof; its six explanatory claims remain incomplete/unmodeled where no Lean declaration supports them. Their source-first review establishes that the prose can serve as authorized non-normative rationale, not that Lean has proved it. Unchanged prior definitions, theorem statements, attached old mapping hashes and code-derived explanations may be reused only if exact objects remain unchanged and the reuse is disclosed. New rationale source requires a new run/comparison object; old source snapshots and judgments remain intact. Final corpus verification is still pending; this comparison does not pre-approve future manifests or translations. + +## Actual use and limits + +See independent-skill-cases/skill-responses.md and per-command JSON. Core/outer mechanical builds and declaration audits both exit 0 with semantic_status not_evaluated after preserving an initial no-declaration rejection. Lean-only identity builds, returns its explicit premise and has no axiom dependencies. Explicit downstream baseline 0.7.2 is retained; missing explicit path fails with no Core fallback. Results support these bounded behavior checks, not whole-text fidelity or proof completeness. + +Self-check across six dimensions: consistency and responsibility allocation are preserved; required source and baseline distinctions are covered in the observed variations; runtime behavior has actual evidence for the named paths; failure cases remain visible and can rebut wider claims; no autonomous capability is inferred from added tools; thin forwarding reduces method duplication while retaining contextual review costs. No new material philosophical choice arose. Further review is justified only for the final new evidence/manuscript objects and the reported command-location correction. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b13bca7 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,40 @@ +# Migration review export + +Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `47a9f88895b7fa1f4366d2ba3ca8e0bf4a75ee82697745cb5673f4c3056a8376`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. + +# Independent source-first assessment + +Recorded 2026-09-13 before reading the author candidate, new Lean code, author reports, or reader verdicts. Reviewer received the raw objective and existing Core philosophy/rationale/methods plus the two current outer Lean skills. The live Chinese AGENTS read already contains a Lean-reader section; it is excluded from this initial source judgment because its timing is uncertain. + +## Fixed source and objective + +Core `PHILOSOPHY.md` declares philosophy/core 0.1.3, format 0.1.0. The English text, including meanings and limits, is the assessment authority. Move Lean implementation and tools into Core, retain outer entrypoints, synchronize actual dependencies and corresponding Chinese text, and report accurate individual statuses without a quota requiring all proofs to pass. This is authorized implementation maintenance, not adoption of a changed philosophy. + +## Original-source judgment and row 133 + +Rationale row 133 currently chooses “A text-centered core and script-free skills.” Its contextual reason is a thin, inspectable text layer without an execution framework; its limit explicitly says that script absence is a design choice and other applications may reasonably use tools. This is non-normative explanatory rationale, not a timeless philosophical prohibition. Core AGENTS currently says delivered core/skills remain text-only. The new explicit objective replaces that implementation constraint within this scope. Merely deleting row 133 would lose the reason/limit distinction: revise it to explain inspectable English commitments plus optional, revisable Lean implementations/tools, justified by source correspondence and reproducible bounded evidence. Preserve that text/tools do not establish clarity, capability, philosophical truth, or universal necessity. Do not describe Lean as part of the philosophical authority or require ordinary assessments to formalize their inputs. + +## Responsibility and dependency boundaries + +- Philosophy 2.1 requires appropriate support for empirical, inferential and value aspects; mechanical checking supplies conditional inferential evidence and cannot certify empirical adequacy or adopted values. +- Philosophy 1.3 forbids concealing changed judgments/conditions; frozen historical results and current stale status must coexist accurately. +- Philosophy 1.4 preserves self-application conditions and rejects self-proof; independent review is the repository method, not a philosophical theorem. +- Philosophy 2.4 requires reasons for the migration and retains alternatives. Central ownership can reduce duplicated implementation while keeping public wrappers; names and Core placement supply no extra authority. +- Existing assess owns compatibility; absorb owns adoption; principled-review returns six-dimension findings; wording review owns language quality only. Lean proof owns inventory, encoding, dependency audit and conditional mechanical result; natural-language skill explains code and compares correspondence without silently upgrading it. +- Current outer proof skill uses outer resolver, parser/checker and references. Relocation must inspect their real imports and data paths, preserve explicit selected baselines, reject invalid explicit paths without fallback, and retain standalone syntax explanation without requiring a philosophical baseline. +- A successful build/audit is not source fidelity. Missing independent review remains incomplete/provisional. Accepted fragments stay limited; rejected correspondence can fail despite a successful build; unsupported/unfinished does not mean false. Verified countermodels can support non-entailment and must not mark the refuted implication as passed. +- Synchronize source/baseline/code/review/manuscript bindings when those dependencies change. Preserve historical evidence and never overwrite hashes to make old evidence current. Structural or wording-only unrelated changes must not require pretending all prior formal claims changed. + +## Six-dimension initial assessment + +Consistency: migration is compatible if the old script-free policy is explicitly updated and authority/status distinctions survive. Minimal completeness: preserve both entrypoints, reference assets, ordinary-text partitioning, explicit-baseline failure behavior and whole-claim/unmodeled coverage; do not use a path-only check as evidence of runtime usability. External adequacy: executable paths, installed toolchain and portable packages need actual checks; currently unknown. Rebuttal: a code-only explanation wrongly resolving philosophy, a changed source shown current, or a rejected mapping shown passed refutes the corresponding implementation claim. Self-transcendence: implementation revisability supports the authorized change but does not prove improvement; the static Lean artifact need not have autonomous orientation. Occam: one Core implementation with narrow outer delegation is preferable if functionality and boundaries are preserved; mechanical duplication merely renamed is not established simplification. + +## Independent small cases, registered before candidate + +Case A — ordinary source: “A workshop values preserving an existing craft. This commitment does not require every implementation to use its oldest tool.” Apply proof workflow to this two-sentence ordinary-text object. Preserve both clauses with nonoverlapping local IDs; distinguish commitment from limit/non-entailment; no metadata injection and no automatic adoption of the source. Any completed proof is conditional on an explicitly explained encoding. Missing review means incomplete rather than passed. + +Case B — Lean-only snippet: `theorem retained (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h`. Apply natural-language entrypoint in both Core and outer with no source prose or adopted baseline. Explain that P is already an explicit premise, conclusion supplied by h, and no independent support or source fidelity is established. A code-only explanation is possible even if no philosophy resolves; mark kernel result unverified unless actual checking runs. + +Case C — baseline variation: repeat A with an explicit downstream baseline file, then an explicit nonexistent baseline path. Retain the valid selected baseline and its directory/version; invalid explicit selection must stop the dependent compatibility stage without silently using bundled Core, while source inventory can continue. A later changed maintained baseline makes a current reader judgment stale, not its frozen theorem false. + +Self-check: these are method/implementation acceptance boundaries, not extra philosophical commitments. Source-only initial assessment cannot certify candidate runtime behavior, translation or semantic fidelity. No candidate verdict is issued yet. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fab352a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `cb99ad55a0e4dad0f45f74ef91d279313333a2571a48e0d3856670ad2734272b`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 第二轮：两个修订对应的独立复评 + +日期：2026-09-13。仅复评c-83-c2和r-121-c4；旧初评、第一轮比较及其四项拒绝判断全部保留，不改写历史。本轮两个新版本均判断partial，详见mapped-judgments-round2.json中的逐条双语理由。c-89-c2和c-94-c3没有修正相关语义，继续rejected。 + +## 新证据与判断变化 + +c-83-c2：SelfAssessingSystem现在实际持有ownPrinciple和samples，runOwnAssessment确实计算同一所属谓词在自身样本上的结果。sampleSystem的[1]通过而0反驳其普遍正确，原先“只有名称、没有对象所属关系与实际考察”的缺口已在这个狭窄解释中补足。因此由rejected改为partial。仍没有形成/修订、适用条件、对评估规则本身的评估或全部反身性；不能从这个实例宣称任何自评都失败或自评永远不能支持正确结论。 + +r-121-c4：删除updateInvalidating实现修复示例，新增originalStates/revisedStates和实际compareReads。direct与cachedRead不变，修订的是比较状态集合，结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)，与本句的评估范围修订有直接有限对应。因此由rejected改为partial。它只是一个静态案例与一个变化案例，未建模一般测试运行器、任意序列、并发或所有回归案例。 + +## 自选实际边界变体 + +所有源码快照、探针、完整重跑命令、首次失败和实际输出保存在reader-round2-probes/。不是仅列计划或手动推断。 + +1. Core：把samples改为空列表，runOwnAssessment返回true，但所属谓词仍在0处为假；把samples改为[1,0]返回false；另建恒真所属谓词，测试返回true且能证明全部输入正确。四个实际输出为(true,true,false,true)，顺序为空样本、原实例、含反例样本、恒真原则。通过可以空泛，也可以与错误或正确并存，是否有实质支持仍需要解释采样和主张范围。 +2. Rationale：compareReads在空状态列表输出[]，仅initial输出[(10,10)]，加入updateOnly initial 10仍只有相同对，真实revisedStates输出[(10,10),(11,10)]。另实际证明initial属于revisedStates。评估修订的可见贡献依赖加入相关变化，不由列表更长或“revised”名称保证。 + +这些边界不要求扩大公布模型。它们要求公布措辞保留“选定非空实例”“加入11这一相关变化”“有限反例/有限比较”，不把样本通过说成完整自评能力，也不把任意新增案例说成改进。 + +## 实际运行与限制 + +首次尝试在两个工程执行lake env lean并导入模块，均因工程搜索路径无对应olean返回1；Lake同时自动创建了此前不存在的lake-manifest.json。未假装首次运行通过。随后将所读完整源码快照与探针体拼接成两个独立Lean文件，使用固定Lean4.33.1二进制检查，均返回0并输出上述结果。这同时检查了源声明与新探针，无需依赖一个未知的新旧构建产物。实际结果含恢复过程和快照hash。 + +本轮未修改维护源码、run.json、原初评或第一轮判断。除Lake自动生成manifest外，新增文件仅在忽略的P下。无需重复已通过探针；后续若文稿宣称超出上述范围，应作为新的具体措辞/对应问题审查。没有full判断或哲学正确性认证。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..19ae64a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `37695a48276f635e264f19ccc07bef559600946518835eef37029ab18c7b3a1d`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 原文初评与已披露编码比较 + +日期：2026-09-13。比较者：reader_source_initial。本轮是在source-initial.md和source-inventory.json冻结后进行的知情比较；不修改两份初评文件。基线仍为Core 0.1.3英文正本及当前rationale。已读取两个run.json、两个完整Lean源文件、encoding-preregistration.md，以及两份entry-data的全部映射条目。输入hash单独保存在comparison-input-hashes.json。 + +## 判断 + +16个已映射源子句中，12项支持有限对应（partial），4项拒绝当前对应（rejected）。另记录15项实质未编码内容为pending，108项结构或表格角色/名称为not_applicable。无full判断。mapped-judgments.json提供逐项英文及中文理由，id使用clause_id；clause=null则使用entry_id。未列出的实质主张应由汇总者明确标为pending并说明没有编码，不能因为条目缺席视为通过。 + +构建与依赖审计通过是调用者披露的机械结果；本轮未重复构建。所有保真判断来自实际定义、完整定理陈述与源文对应，不来自build状态。没有把未建模判为哲学缺陷。 + +## 四项当前对应应撤回或修订 + +1. c-89-c2：ObservationComplete只表示列表覆盖全部自然数，不含观测结果、主张、根据和支持关系。因此observation_gap及真假结论并列定理均不能表示“根据支持与主张强度/范围相称”。尤其真结论n+0=n已有独立证明，不能因列表未覆盖全部自然数称它支持不足；反过来只有输入覆盖也不保证观测内容为真或相关。预注册的“coverage sufficiency criterion”并未以证据与结论的关系实现，而且若被视为一般充分支持会改变原义。最小修正是撤回这四项对c-89-c2的映射，保留未映射的算术/覆盖示例；若要重新映射，需要明确的仅凭观测记录的蕴涵模型及额外假设，不能以名称补足。 +2. c-94-c3：unrelated_grounds_rejected仅因bothExamined要求grounds=3而拒绝4，证明的是记录编号不匹配。它没有实现“考察那些根据是否支持相应主张”。允许examined作为外部关系的条件化接口，不等于具体编号等式已经有考察语义。应撤回对这句实质考察责任的映射，保留编号完整性探针。c-94-c5/c6可保留为条件化责任分配和分类标签无免责效力的有限接口。 +3. c-83-c2：self_assessment_not_correctness是样本1通过、输入0失败的局部测试反例。没有系统、它的评估原则或将同一评估原则用于自身的行为；selfAssessmentSamples只是名称。应撤回当前自评对应，或建立有解释依据的自评对象与行为实例。这个算术结果可有限说明局部通过不能保证普遍正确，但后者不等同于原文的反身对象关系。 +4. r-121-c4：invalidation_restores_fixture修改了实现，令acknowledged与cached同步；原文此句说修订评估方法，比较两个候选的update–read序列并保留静态案例。不能把修复实现当成修订评估方法。最小修正是将映射改为实际update_read_counterexample加original_comparison/unchanged_update_retained，并仍标partial；正向失效更新实例可保留为额外候选示例，不能凭它证明测试集合保留或评估流程已形式化。 + +## 有限成立之处及保留界限 + +- 实际类型叫Aspect，具有empirical/inferential/value三个构造子，源码没有Kind声明。这是应用预设分类而非完整认识论分类的证明。Duties保留同一claim/grounds对及每个实际适用面的责任；mixed_projection只是由已假设的Duties投影，不构成外部责任已履行的证据。bothExamined及empiricalOnly是编号/标签记录，未实现经验考察的不确定性、推论支持关系或价值批评责任。标签遗漏反例能说明该接口的责任不随labels变化，不能证明真实适用分类已穷尽。 +- Consistent的整个held列表可产生联合后果，p/pImpliesQ/notQ确实触发一个context的正反结论；撤回及不同context示例提供有限对应。context把问题/假设/含义/范围折叠，推论关系是一个预设实例而非通用逻辑系统。ChangeReported只在实质撤回实例中对应明确；一般List不等会把重排或重复也视为变化，不能泛称语义变化判定器。 +- R1：namedUniversalTruth明确为h:P推出P，不是无条件普遍真理。0≤1与被2反驳的∀n,n≤1构成条件/量词改变的具体反例，支持“证明这个陈述不能自动建立另一个陈述”的有限说明。different_statement_refuted确实断言这个选定更强命题为假；这可以是具体见证，但中文英文解释均须避免提升为“凡对应失败，散文主张必假”。未编码一般证明可靠性、任意编码对应或哲学承诺的真假。r-77-c1与c4仍未映射。 +- 软件初态10/10、预算6下时延5/2均合格；updateOnly改为11后缓存仍10，直接读取11。它们实现源案例的一个明确反例，未建模真实时延、并发或全部故障。budget3是另一情境，预算定理仅覆盖r-119-c2合取义务的时延部分，新鲜度责任仍未表达。 +- 当前rationale.L120（r-120-c2至c6）没有任何声明映射，旧method-stage对应已撤回；这是正确保留缺口。此处的Grounds/Consistency/Reflexivity/可审查性推论不能由算术状态定理替代。r-119-c1与r-120-c1等“Additional premises”“Inference”只是表格角色，已标not_applicable。 + +## 范围与自检 + +本轮对所有16个已映射子句逐项检查了实际声明；未宣称全部未映射子句已做同等深度编码评审。结构、表格角色名称与实质论断分开，源文仍完整保留。模型失败不改写原文；既有初评与hash不变。判断标准没有因作者声明“checked”或“limited”而降低，partial也不意味着完整子句已被证明。有限接口可作为可读实例；错误的直接对应应修正而不是仅靠总体免责声明稀释。 + +没有必要递归委派或重跑相同构建。后续仅需比较有实质变化的映射/编码和文稿陈述，并分别保留原判与新判。未执行维护文件修改或哲学采用。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..90b1632 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `5a292830b2fdb6e0670049bf56bbb278416fd2418272e4d586bd8f0f904386b8`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Independent source-only initial assessment — frozen + +Date: 2026-09-13. Reviewer: reader_source_initial. This record precedes disclosure of any current candidate encoding, author verdict, or expected comparison result. Selected baseline: `OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md` philosophy/core 0.1.3, English authority. Companion: `OrganonCore/docs/rationale.md`, non-normative. Goal supplied by caller: faithful limited Lean formalization and two-granularity English/Chinese explanations covering the 22 Core text units and the complete rationale. No candidate has been assessed here, and this is not an adoption judgment. + +## Provenance and limits of independence + +Read the supplied Core AGENTS, PHILOSOPHY and rationale in full; RTK instructions; assess, principled-review, wording-review, shared iteration and philosophy-resolution instructions; translation guidance. No candidate code, author rationale, prior detailed review, blind translation, or archive package was opened. AGENTS instructed starting local records from ACTIVE.md; reading that index incidentally exposed one-line historical task summaries, including an earlier description of Assessment as an accepted conditional normative interface. Those summaries are not source evidence and are not used to determine this judgment. This limited exposure prevents claiming complete ignorance of historical verdict metadata. Exact source clauses, not that summary, ground the distinctions below. No recursive delegation occurred. + +## Initial judgment and expected fidelity boundaries + +The source supports a limited formal interpretation of selected responsibility and support relations, if the interpretation explicitly preserves normative force, applicability, and the distinction between supporting a claim and examining its support. It does not supply a complete formal ontology, inference calculus, support metric, or source-to-model correspondence proof. The success of a Lean check could establish an encoded statement under its assumptions; its relevance to the prose remains a separate judgment. Unknown correspondence is not a pass, a core conflict, or proof that the source is defective. + +1. Core preamble: adopted commitments, meanings, and application limits constitute the authority; they are not descriptive laws of every system. Charter and Grounds mutually constrain each other without priority or deductive hierarchy. Rationale and contextual skill requirements must retain their separate status. +2. Self-Transcendence: expansion is valued, not merely allowed. Organization, methods and principles remain revisable. Orientation, permission, actual change and supported achievement are different. Universal nonfinality within the relevant existing forms does not impose change on every action, guarantee progress, exclude justified stability, or demand independence from external help. +3. Internal Consistency: preserve simultaneous holding and implications, same question, assumptions, meanings and scope. Changing or withdrawing a judgment may remove co-holding; concealed redefinition cannot erase a prior contradiction. Tension is not yet contradiction. Compatibility cannot stand for correctness, adequacy or inferential entailment. +4. Reflexivity: both system and formation/application/revision of principles are assessment and generation objects, subject to their applicable conditions. No self exemption when conditions hold, no unconditional application of every principle to itself. Self-application and internally produced revision do not establish correctness or sufficient grounds. +5. Grounds and Assessment: articulability identifies concepts, assumptions, reasons and limits. Assessment examines whether those grounds support the corresponding claim; completing it may establish insufficient support. It must not be encoded as an obligation to obtain a successful support verdict, nor as a completed marker lacking claim/grounds/conditions correspondence. Each applicable mixed aspect retains its responsibility even without a classification tag. Empirical assessment examines evidence/performance plus support conditions, scope and uncertainty; inferential assessment examines assumptions and inferential relations; value assessment states position, reasons, limits and consequences and stays open to relevant criticism. An initial value commitment need not prove every starting assumption. The general proportionate-support constraint limits claims; it does not guarantee all assessed claims are supported. +6. Scope and tools: local agreement cannot establish unconditional universals or absence of omitted differences. Measurement, repetition and frameworks can be useful but form no universally mandatory chain. A verifiable unreproduced observation may offer limited support; stochastic output identity and stability of conclusions are different. +7. Capability claims: application-specific definitions and conditions determine the actual claim. External evidence may support a capability without internal explanation; reliable output does not automatically establish understanding. An application may explicitly require explanation. Counts alone do not establish expansion. Narrowing a definition creates a new claim and cannot retroactively prove the old one. +8. Choice commitment: relevant reasons connect priority to objectives, values and constraints. Name, convention or status alone are insufficient; tradition may embody an explicitly adopted value with a relevant connection. This additional commitment is not derived merely from grouping it under Grounds. Openness does not imply equivalence, multiple feasible means, mandatory novelty, or rejection of established methods. Internal method properties may matter. +9. Relationships and terms: retain all foregoing distinctions under mutual application; no self-proof follows. “Assessment” includes reasons, applicability and observed performance and is not limited to executable tests. Read that list with the type-appropriate assessment responsibilities rather than silently making empirical outcome evidence mandatory for every claim type. +10. Rationale: preserve arguments’ premises, objections and limits, historical placement assertions as assertions of this text, and all illustrative cases. Removal checks concern loss of an explicit contribution, expressly not formal independence. Hypothetical research/software examples add contextual values and constraints; potential contributions and bounded support are not actual proof of domain-wide improvement. Repository tools, English authority, independent-first review and records are contextual arrangements rather than philosophical theorems. +11. Formal-proof example (rationale line 77): the hypothesis includes a checked proof whose encoding changes the claim’s conditions or claim-to-grounds relation. Its encoded statement is established relative to assumptions and proof dependencies, but this does not thereby establish the different prose claim. Correspondence failure is initially a modeling finding, not itself a reason to revise the commitment. A formalization must keep checked derivation, source interpretation and support relevance separately reviewable. Non-entailment must not be replaced by falsity of the prose conclusion. + +## Questions not fixed by the source + +- “Intrinsic orientation when expansion is regarded as worth pursuing” supplies an intended meaning but no measurable criterion or complete equivalence schema. A model’s precise predicate/definition is an interpretation to disclose. +- Contradiction, relevant implications, and the admissible inference calculus are not algorithmically fixed. Selecting classical proposition logic, a finite claim domain, or a closure rule adds modeling choices. +- Proportionate support has no universal numerical or ordered scale in the text. Claim/grounds correspondence and sufficient support require interpreted relations and contextual evidence; their names alone cannot establish them. +- Applicable aspects are not supplied as an exhaustive classification algorithm. A finite aspect datatype can be a bounded application interface only if its coverage limits and unclassified cases are explicit. +- The Assessment terminology row does not define a formal selector for when observed-performance examination applies. Its claim-appropriate context rules out silently making empirical evidence a universal prerequisite; an exact selector remains an additional interpretation. +- The proof example contains no concrete model or correspondence test; it cannot determine an unseen candidate’s fidelity. The software example does not fully specify concurrency semantics or all workloads; the research example supplies no actual study results. These are bounded examples, not omissions to fill as source commitments. +- The rationale’s external simplicity-source attribution has been preserved but not independently fact-checked in this source-only task. No judgment about the external article’s accuracy is offered. + +These are interpretation and support boundaries, not established contradictions in the philosophy. None authorizes changing the adopted commitments. + +## Coverage and bounded self-check + +`source-inventory.json` preserves exact text and line numbers for every nonempty source line, including every paragraph, table row, heading, ID and metadata line. Each substantive entry has a source-specific initial reading of force, conditions, intended contribution and unresolved questions, plus first-pass clause splits and force/scope markers. Splitting is not a formal parse; nested semantic clauses can remain. Structural rows carry no independent philosophical obligations. The Core has exactly 22 stable IDs: 20 directly contain substantive text and two (`organon.charter`, `organon.relationships`) are structural groupings. They must not be populated with invented commitments merely to match a count. + +Actual checks: the inventory contains 202 exact nonempty lines (Core 99; rationale 103), with 119 substantive paragraph/table entries. These are documentary coverage checks, not whole-text semantic-completeness certification. No model, proof, bilingual candidate or actual reader outcome was inspected. No claim is made about universal adequacy, formal independence, minimality, or philosophical truth. + +Bounded review of this record: consistency checked by keeping responsibilities separate from successful outcomes and current commitments separate from contextual methods; completeness is limited to the supplied source and first-pass clause readings; external adequacy of hypothetical cases cannot be inferred without actual evidence; a concrete correspondence counterexample can revise a later candidate judgment; a static inventory need not display a system’s generative orientation; no comparative parsimony advantage is claimed without a comparable alternative. An initial inventory is useful as a traceable baseline, not sufficient as fidelity evidence. Stop here until candidate disclosure supplies new evidence. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..582c09a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +# Reported source fidelity + +These are reported semantic judgments, not kernel conclusions. Initial records precede comparison; revised mappings have informed follow-up judgments. Two rejected attempts have editorial current-result wording; their original independent reasons and verdicts remain in the initial comparison export. The bound records and exact object hashes are listed in fidelity.json. Unmodeled entries remain pending; structure is not a philosophical theorem. + +## r-77-c2 — partial + +namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. + +## r-77-c3 — partial + +The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. + +## r-119-c2 — partial + +budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. + +## r-119-c5 — partial + +original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. + +## r-121-c2 — partial + +The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. + +## r-121-c3 — partial + +A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. + +## r-121-c4 — partial + +compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8f23b0d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json @@ -0,0 +1,4126 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "source": { + "kind": "text", + "path": "snapshots/source.md", + "snapshot": "snapshots/source.md", + "sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c", + "spans": [ + { + "id": "rationale.L1", + "start_line": 1, + "end_line": 1 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L2", + "start_line": 2, + "end_line": 2 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L3", + "start_line": 3, + "end_line": 3 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L4", + "start_line": 4, + "end_line": 4 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L5", + "start_line": 5, + "end_line": 5 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L6", + "start_line": 6, + "end_line": 6 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L7", + "start_line": 7, + "end_line": 7 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L8", + "start_line": 8, + "end_line": 8 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L9", + "start_line": 9, + "end_line": 9 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L10", + "start_line": 10, + "end_line": 10 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L11", + "start_line": 11, + "end_line": 11 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L12", + "start_line": 12, + "end_line": 12 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L13", + "start_line": 13, + "end_line": 13 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L14", + "start_line": 14, + "end_line": 14 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L15", + "start_line": 15, + "end_line": 15 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L16", + "start_line": 16, + "end_line": 16 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L17", + "start_line": 17, + "end_line": 17 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L18", + "start_line": 18, + "end_line": 18 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L19", + "start_line": 19, + "end_line": 19 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L20", + "start_line": 20, + "end_line": 20 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L21", + "start_line": 21, + "end_line": 21 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L22", + "start_line": 22, + "end_line": 22 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L23", + "start_line": 23, + "end_line": 23 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L24", + "start_line": 24, + "end_line": 24 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L25", + "start_line": 25, + "end_line": 25 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L26", + "start_line": 26, + "end_line": 26 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L27", + "start_line": 27, + "end_line": 27 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L28", + "start_line": 28, + "end_line": 28 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L29", + "start_line": 29, + "end_line": 29 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L30", + "start_line": 30, + "end_line": 30 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L31", + "start_line": 31, + "end_line": 31 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L32", + "start_line": 32, + "end_line": 32 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L33", + "start_line": 33, + "end_line": 33 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L34", + "start_line": 34, + "end_line": 34 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L35", + "start_line": 35, + "end_line": 35 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L36", + "start_line": 36, + "end_line": 36 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L37", + "start_line": 37, + "end_line": 37 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L38", + "start_line": 38, + "end_line": 38 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L39", + "start_line": 39, + "end_line": 39 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L40", + "start_line": 40, + "end_line": 40 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L41", + "start_line": 41, + "end_line": 41 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L42", + "start_line": 42, + "end_line": 42 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L43", + "start_line": 43, + "end_line": 43 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L44", + "start_line": 44, + "end_line": 44 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L45", + "start_line": 45, + "end_line": 45 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L46", + "start_line": 46, + "end_line": 46 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L47", + "start_line": 47, + "end_line": 47 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L48", + "start_line": 48, + "end_line": 48 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L49", + "start_line": 49, + "end_line": 49 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L50", + "start_line": 50, + "end_line": 50 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L51", + "start_line": 51, + "end_line": 51 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L52", + "start_line": 52, + "end_line": 52 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L53", + "start_line": 53, + "end_line": 53 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L54", + "start_line": 54, + "end_line": 54 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L55", + "start_line": 55, + "end_line": 55 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L56", + "start_line": 56, + "end_line": 56 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L57", + "start_line": 57, + "end_line": 57 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L58", + "start_line": 58, + "end_line": 58 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L59", + "start_line": 59, + "end_line": 59 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L60", + "start_line": 60, + "end_line": 60 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L61", + "start_line": 61, + "end_line": 61 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L62", + "start_line": 62, + "end_line": 62 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L63", + "start_line": 63, + "end_line": 63 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L64", + "start_line": 64, + "end_line": 64 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L65", + "start_line": 65, + "end_line": 65 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L66", + "start_line": 66, + "end_line": 66 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L67", + "start_line": 67, + "end_line": 67 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L68", + "start_line": 68, + "end_line": 68 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L69", + "start_line": 69, + "end_line": 69 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L70", + "start_line": 70, + "end_line": 70 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L71", + "start_line": 71, + "end_line": 71 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L72", + "start_line": 72, + "end_line": 72 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L73", + "start_line": 73, + "end_line": 73 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L74", + "start_line": 74, + "end_line": 74 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L75", + "start_line": 75, + "end_line": 75 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L76", + "start_line": 76, + "end_line": 76 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L77", + "start_line": 77, + "end_line": 77 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L78", + "start_line": 78, + "end_line": 78 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L79", + "start_line": 79, + "end_line": 79 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L80", + "start_line": 80, + "end_line": 80 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L81", + "start_line": 81, + "end_line": 81 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L82", + "start_line": 82, + "end_line": 82 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L83", + "start_line": 83, + "end_line": 83 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L84", + "start_line": 84, + "end_line": 84 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L85", + "start_line": 85, + "end_line": 85 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L86", + "start_line": 86, + "end_line": 86 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L87", + "start_line": 87, + "end_line": 87 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L88", + "start_line": 88, + "end_line": 88 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L89", + "start_line": 89, + "end_line": 89 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L90", + "start_line": 90, + "end_line": 90 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L91", + "start_line": 91, + "end_line": 91 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L92", + "start_line": 92, + "end_line": 92 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L93", + "start_line": 93, + "end_line": 93 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L94", + "start_line": 94, + "end_line": 94 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L95", + "start_line": 95, + "end_line": 95 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L96", + "start_line": 96, + "end_line": 96 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L97", + "start_line": 97, + "end_line": 97 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L98", + "start_line": 98, + "end_line": 98 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L99", + "start_line": 99, + "end_line": 99 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L100", + "start_line": 100, + "end_line": 100 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L101", + "start_line": 101, + "end_line": 101 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L102", + "start_line": 102, + "end_line": 102 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L103", + "start_line": 103, + "end_line": 103 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L104", + "start_line": 104, + "end_line": 104 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L105", + "start_line": 105, + "end_line": 105 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L106", + "start_line": 106, + "end_line": 106 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L107", + "start_line": 107, + "end_line": 107 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L108", + "start_line": 108, + "end_line": 108 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L109", + "start_line": 109, + "end_line": 109 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L110", + "start_line": 110, + "end_line": 110 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L111", + "start_line": 111, + "end_line": 111 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L112", + "start_line": 112, + "end_line": 112 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L113", + "start_line": 113, + "end_line": 113 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L114", + "start_line": 114, + "end_line": 114 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L115", + "start_line": 115, + "end_line": 115 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L116", + "start_line": 116, + "end_line": 116 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L117", + "start_line": 117, + "end_line": 117 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L118", + "start_line": 118, + "end_line": 118 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L119", + "start_line": 119, + "end_line": 119 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L120", + "start_line": 120, + "end_line": 120 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L121", + "start_line": 121, + "end_line": 121 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L122", + "start_line": 122, + "end_line": 122 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L123", + "start_line": 123, + "end_line": 123 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L124", + "start_line": 124, + "end_line": 124 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L125", + "start_line": 125, + "end_line": 125 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L126", + "start_line": 126, + "end_line": 126 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L127", + "start_line": 127, + "end_line": 127 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L128", + "start_line": 128, + "end_line": 128 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L129", + "start_line": 129, + "end_line": 129 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L130", + "start_line": 130, + "end_line": 130 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L131", + "start_line": 131, + "end_line": 131 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L132", + "start_line": 132, + "end_line": 132 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L133", + "start_line": 133, + "end_line": 133 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L134", + "start_line": 134, + "end_line": 134 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L135", + "start_line": 135, + "end_line": 135 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L136", + "start_line": 136, + "end_line": 136 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L137", + "start_line": 137, + "end_line": 137 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L138", + "start_line": 138, + "end_line": 138 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L139", + "start_line": 139, + "end_line": 139 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L140", + "start_line": 140, + "end_line": 140 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L141", + "start_line": 141, + "end_line": 141 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L142", + "start_line": 142, + "end_line": 142 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L143", + "start_line": 143, + "end_line": 143 + } + ] + }, + "baseline": { + "path": "snapshots/philosophy.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" + }, + "project": { + "path": "leanified", + "root_module": "RationaleReader" + }, + "preregistration": { + "path": "PREREGISTERED.md", + "sha256": "fcfbe0b6daf4ff8498d085e5ce4a677737cca418cf1cda957a1110a9d86c5d15" + }, + "units": [ + { + "id": "rationale.L1", + "hash": "668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L2", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L3", + "hash": "ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "claim": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "claim": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L4", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L5", + "hash": "933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "claim": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "claim": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "claim": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L6", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L7", + "hash": "1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L8", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L9", + "hash": "a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L10", + "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L11", + "hash": "d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "claim": "Generative Drive", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "claim": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "claim": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "claim": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L12", + "hash": "fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "claim": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "claim": "Charter, unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "claim": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L13", + "hash": "64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "claim": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "claim": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "claim": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "claim": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L14", + "hash": "6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "claim": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "claim": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "claim": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "claim": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "claim": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L15", + "hash": "33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "claim": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "claim": "The provision and its conditions remain.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "claim": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L16", + "hash": "a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "claim": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "claim": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "claim": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "claim": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L17", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L18", + "hash": "0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L19", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L20", + "hash": "10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L21", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L22", + "hash": "f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "claim": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "claim": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L23", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L24", + "hash": "4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L25", + "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L26", + "hash": "4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "claim": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "claim": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "claim": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "claim": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "claim": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L27", + "hash": "7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "claim": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "claim": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "claim": "This supports examining their compatibility.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "claim": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "claim": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "claim": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L28", + "hash": "104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "claim": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "claim": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "claim": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "claim": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "claim": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L29", + "hash": "9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "claim": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "claim": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "claim": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "claim": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "claim": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "claim": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L30", + "hash": "60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "claim": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "claim": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "claim": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "claim": "They are not disallowed;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "claim": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "claim": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L31", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L32", + "hash": "7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "claim": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "claim": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "claim": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L33", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L34", + "hash": "4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L35", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L36", + "hash": "caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "claim": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "claim": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "claim": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L37", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L38", + "hash": "3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "claim": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "claim": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "claim": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "claim": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "claim": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L39", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L40", + "hash": "b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "claim": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "claim": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "claim": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "claim": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "claim": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L41", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L42", + "hash": "54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L43", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L44", + "hash": "8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "claim": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "claim": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "claim": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "claim": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L45", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L46", + "hash": "0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L47", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L48", + "hash": "956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "claim": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "claim": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "claim": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "claim": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "claim": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "claim": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "claim": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "claim": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L49", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L50", + "hash": "4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "claim": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "claim": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "claim": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "claim": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "claim": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L51", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L52", + "hash": "219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L53", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L54", + "hash": "d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L55", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L56", + "hash": "90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "claim": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "claim": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L57", + "hash": "d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "claim": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "claim": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "claim": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "claim": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L58", + "hash": "b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "claim": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "claim": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "claim": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L59", + "hash": "34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "claim": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "claim": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L60", + "hash": "66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "claim": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L61", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L62", + "hash": "c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "claim": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "claim": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "claim": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L63", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L64", + "hash": "97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L65", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L66", + "hash": "959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "claim": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "claim": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "claim": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L67", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L68", + "hash": "08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L69", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L70", + "hash": "d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "claim": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "claim": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "claim": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L71", + "hash": "9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "claim": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "claim": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "claim": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L72", + "hash": "02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "claim": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "claim": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L73", + "hash": "e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "claim": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "claim": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "claim": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L74", + "hash": "330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "claim": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "claim": "This violates internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "claim": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L75", + "hash": "34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "claim": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "claim": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L76", + "hash": "1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "claim": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "claim": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "claim": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L77", + "hash": "10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "claim": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "claim": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "claim": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "claim": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L78", + "hash": "6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "claim": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "claim": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "claim": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L79", + "hash": "e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "claim": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "claim": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "claim": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "claim": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L80", + "hash": "cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "claim": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "claim": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "claim": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L81", + "hash": "06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "claim": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "claim": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "claim": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "claim": "These capability definitions come from the application.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L82", + "hash": "bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "claim": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "claim": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "claim": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "claim": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L83", + "hash": "3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "claim": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "claim": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "claim": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "claim": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L84", + "hash": "252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "claim": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "claim": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L85", + "hash": "25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "claim": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "claim": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "claim": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L86", + "hash": "a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "claim": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "claim": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "claim": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L87", + "hash": "2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "claim": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "claim": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L88", + "hash": "b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "claim": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "claim": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "claim": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L89", + "hash": "9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "claim": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "claim": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "claim": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "claim": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L90", + "hash": "b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "claim": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "claim": "Renaming alone adds no support.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "claim": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L91", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L92", + "hash": "bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L93", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L94", + "hash": "8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "claim": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "claim": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "claim": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "claim": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L95", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L96", + "hash": "30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "claim": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "claim": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "claim": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "claim": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L97", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L98", + "hash": "310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "claim": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "claim": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "claim": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L99", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L100", + "hash": "e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L101", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L102", + "hash": "23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "claim": "The following are hypothetical applications.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "claim": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "claim": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L103", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L104", + "hash": "e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L105", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L106", + "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L107", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L108", + "hash": "b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "claim": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "claim": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L109", + "hash": "51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "claim": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "claim": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "claim": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "claim": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "claim": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L110", + "hash": "bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "claim": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "claim": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "claim": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "claim": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "claim": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L111", + "hash": "b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "claim": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "claim": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "claim": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "claim": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "claim": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "claim": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L112", + "hash": "2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "claim": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "claim": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "claim": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "claim": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "claim": "the number of labels alone cannot.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "claim": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "claim": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "claim": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L113", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L114", + "hash": "ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L115", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L116", + "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L117", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L118", + "hash": "7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "claim": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "claim": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L119", + "hash": "2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "claim": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "claim": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "claim": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "claim": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "claim": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "claim": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "claim": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L120", + "hash": "4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "claim": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "claim": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "claim": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "claim": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "claim": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L121", + "hash": "572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "claim": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "claim": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "claim": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "claim": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "claim": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L122", + "hash": "b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "claim": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "claim": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "claim": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "claim": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "claim": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L123", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L124", + "hash": "a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "claim": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "claim": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "claim": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L125", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L126", + "hash": "e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L127", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L128", + "hash": "138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "claim": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "claim": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L129", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L130", + "hash": "9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L131", + "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L132", + "hash": "d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "claim": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "claim": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "claim": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "claim": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "claim": "Another project could select a different language.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L133", + "hash": "044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "Revised implementation rationale; no Lean proof is supplied for this row.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c1", + "claim": "A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c2", + "claim": "Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c3", + "claim": "Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c4", + "claim": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c5", + "claim": "Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c6", + "claim": "Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-v2-c7", + "claim": "The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L134", + "hash": "4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "claim": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "claim": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "claim": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "claim": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "claim": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L135", + "hash": "7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "claim": "`organon-core-principled-review`", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "claim": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "claim": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "claim": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "claim": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "claim": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L136", + "hash": "0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "claim": "External `grill-me/grilling`", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "claim": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "claim": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "claim": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "claim": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L137", + "hash": "89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "claim": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "claim": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "claim": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "claim": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "claim": "A consensus is not proof.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "claim": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L138", + "hash": "c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "claim": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "claim": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "claim": "These are contextual method requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "claim": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L139", + "hash": "57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "claim": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "claim": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "claim": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "claim": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "claim": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L140", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L141", + "hash": "46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "claim": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "claim": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "claim": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "claim": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L142", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L143", + "hash": "0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "claim": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "claim": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "claim": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "claim": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + } + ], + "declarations": [ + { + "name": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c5" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c2" + }, + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c3" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c4" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c3" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c3" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c4" + } + ] + } + ], + "cases": [ + { + "id": "original_comparison", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "update_read_counterexample", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "cached_freshness_refuted", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "unchanged_update_retained", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "budget_change_is_distinct", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "namedUniversalTruth", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "encoded_statement", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "different_statement_refuted", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "proof_of_different_claim", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "revised_method_retains_case", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", + "kind": "method_coverage_fixture", + "expectation": "Compute both read implementations on initial and post-update states, retaining the initial case; no implementation is changed." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3705ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +--- +format_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.3 +core_version: 0.1.3 +derived_from: null +--- +# Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds + + +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. + +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. + +## 1. Charter + + +### 1.1 Overview + + +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. + +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. + +### 1.2 Self-Transcendence + + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. + +#### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation + + +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. + +#### 1.2.2 Non-finality + + +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. + +#### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits + + +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. + +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. + +### 1.3 Internal Consistency + + +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. + +#### 1.3.1 Meaning + + +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. + +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. + +#### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. + +### 1.4 Reflexivity + + +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. + +#### 1.4.1 Meaning + + +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. + +#### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. + +## 2. Grounds + + +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. + +### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment + + +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. + +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | + +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. + +### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement + + +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. + +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. + +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. + +### 2.3 Capability Claims + + +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. + +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. + +### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives + + +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. + +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. + +#### 2.4.1 Conditions and Limits + + +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. + +## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms + + +### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints + + +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. + +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. + +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. + +### 3.2 Necessary Terms + + +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e55f231 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +# Organon Rationale + +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). It does not add obligations to the philosophy. + +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. + +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Generative Drive | Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. | Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. | +| Internal Consistency and Reflexivity | Charter, unchanged. | Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. | +| Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries | Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. | General requirements and limits retain their normative force. The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. | +| Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation | Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. | The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations | Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. | The provision and its conditions remain. Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. | +| Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships | Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. | Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. | + +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. + +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Self-Transcendence | Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. | Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. | +| Internal Consistency | If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. This supports examining their compatibility. | A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. | +| Reflexivity | A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. | Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. | +| Grounds | When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. | Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations | If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. | Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. They are not disallowed; the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. | + +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. + +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. The current core withdraws that uniform definition. Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. + +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. + +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. + +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. Each choice needs contextual reasons. These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. + +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. + +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. + +## 3. Removal Check + +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | +| --- | --- | +| Self-Transcendence | The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. | +| Internal Consistency | There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. | +| Reflexivity | Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. | +| Grounds | The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds | General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. | + +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. + +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. These examine the meaning of the philosophy; they are not steps a system is required to execute. + +| Case | Judgment and limits | +| --- | --- | +| A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. | Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. | +| A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. | Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. | +| A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. | It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. | +| Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. | Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. | +| Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. | This violates internal consistency. Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. | +| A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. | This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. | +| Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. | Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. Grounds requires examination of the support relation. | +| A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. | The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. | +| A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. | It can be assessed as a value commitment. Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. | +| A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. | It may provide corresponding limited support. Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. | +| A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. | Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. | +| An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. | The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. These capability definitions come from the application. | +| An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. | Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. | +| An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; the same reliable black box cannot do so. | Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. | +| After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. | A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. | +| A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. | The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. | +| An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. | Conventional use is not the sole ground. Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. | +| An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. | Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. | +| Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. | This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. | +| A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. | Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. | +| An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. | Renaming alone adds no support. Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. | + +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. + +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. + +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; they cannot replace philosophical argument. These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. + +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +The following are hypothetical applications. Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; their conclusions hold within those premises. + +### 6.1 Research Team + +| Argument element | Application | +| --- | --- | +| Claim | A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. | +| Additional premises | The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; the material does not establish population prevalence. | +| Inference | Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. | +| Counterexample | An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. | +| Conclusion | The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; the number of labels alone cannot. Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. | + +### 6.2 Software System + +| Argument element | Application | +| --- | --- | +| Claim | A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. | +| Additional premises | The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. | +| Inference | Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. | +| Counterexample | Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. | +| Conclusion | The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. | + +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. + +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. + +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | +| --- | --- | --- | +| English authority with a corresponding Chinese version | The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. | No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. Another project could select a different language. | +| A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling | Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable. Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support. | Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness. Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment. The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints. | +| `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` | Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. | Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. | +| `organon-core-principled-review` | A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. | Findings retain their standards and limits; they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. | +| External `grill-me/grilling` | Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. | A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. | +| An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal | A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. | Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. A consensus is not proof. A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. | +| Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations | This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. | These are contextual method requirements. A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. | +| A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment | Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. | A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. | + +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. + +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a65a742 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md @@ -0,0 +1,17 @@ +# New compact models — registered before Lean authoring + +These are new bounded encodings for readable evidence, not unchanged replays of all older projects. Historical Core/Rationale models remain untouched; unretained results do not silently become current results. Inventory all original content, map only explicit selected fragments. No whole philosophical text is expected to be proved. + +Core fragments: responsibility quantified over actual applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, independently of labels; domain relation supplied and not self-validating. Preserve empirical/value mixed applicability via concrete claim-aspect fixture and wrong-grounds/reported-label variants. The full articulation, basis quality, proportionality, value criticism and all listed empirical/inferential duties remain unmodeled by this narrower interface; do not label whole Assessment passed. Separate sufficient support from truth using a finite observation set with an explicitly stated universal-coverage sufficiency criterion for all natural inputs; bounded observations cannot establish a universal property, whether the property is actually true or false. + +Consistency: whole held-set input to an explicit consequence relation, context/question/polarity; a concrete P, P→Q, ¬Q fixture uses a registered one-step consequence for this case, not a general logical calculus. Joint inconsistency, removal of ¬Q, and opposite judgments under distinct contexts get actual probes. A separate changed-content reporting obligation is an interface, not an assertion a real change was reported. + +Reflexivity: concrete arithmetic principle n+1=2*n checked on sample1 can pass while counterexample0 refutes it; evaluating oneself is a separate recorded action. This supplies a relevant finite counterexample to self-assessment alone implying correctness, not a general diagnosis of every system or proof that the normative provision is obeyed. + +Rationale R1: actual conditional identity theorem h:P⊢P plus a true coded arithmetic claim and false different prose claim; exact arithmetic counterexample illustrates that a proof of one statement does not prove a different stronger statement. Missing bridge is a modeling finding, not proof that philosophical commitments fail. It is an illustration of the accepted R1 row, never a mathematical proof of every prose correspondence judgment. + +Rationale software/L119: ServiceState contains acknowledged and cached natural values; direct read reads acknowledged, cache reads cached; updateOnly changes acknowledged and retains cached. Initial10/10, original latencies5/2,budget6 both acceptable; update11 yields11/10. Original-match plus later-mismatch witnesses failure of global equivalence. Positive invalidating update sets both11; unchanged update10 retains agreement. Withdraw any mapping to method-stage lists. Separate tightened budget3 is a different context, not the original case. + +Rationale removal arguments and value/historical/general method effectiveness claims remain source-inventoried but unproved unless a reviewed direct correspondence is available. No Boolean encoding of arbitrary truth values substitutes for an empirical or value argument. All new declarations and cases will be root-imported and audited with fixed Lean4.33.1/core; no project axioms or sorry. + +Source initial and code-only explanation are independent roles. Initial coding model tests may precede fidelity acceptance, but published passed/limited states require the recorded corresponding review. New model tradeoff: intentionally small exact worked fragments for readers instead of importing large legacy interfaces with stale provenance; report reduced retained proof coverage, not a formalization improvement by line count. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d2976ce --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +import RationaleReader +#check RationaleReader.original_comparison +#print axioms RationaleReader.original_comparison +#check RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +#print axioms RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +#check RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +#print axioms RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +#check RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +#print axioms RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +#check RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +#print axioms RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +#check RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +#print axioms RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +#check RationaleReader.encoded_statement +#print axioms RationaleReader.encoded_statement +#check RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +#print axioms RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +#check RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +#print axioms RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +#check RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +#print axioms RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f6e4bd8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json @@ -0,0 +1,45 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", + "baseline_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "raw_summary_sha256": "25c3e4c55898a2f4768b4069b7a4b872a8b38ffc41b69b689b249164ac737344", + "record_note": "Extract of an actual check; machine-specific evidence directory omitted. Kernel checking does not validate fidelity." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f6f4e2f --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,2652 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "bce2fcebdfa3adb21aa636f59fbe69d5de1aa2162c09ad861922df2b9d49a7f4" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "actual_summary_sha256": "b4c97914c3d09858893ed73432b15be209059e79bb2411e1a4b265f6e7233bf2", + "checker_sha256": { + "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "477e9bd0e87f4abb1748dba017952e1e03794900bbdb3dda3fbfa423990a6fb7", + "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" + }, + "record_note": "Actual final check with machine-specific evidence-directory field omitted; semantic judgments remain reported." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2e578cf --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json @@ -0,0 +1,42 @@ +{ + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "errors": [], + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "passed": true, + "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44" +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..759779a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@ +✔ [2/3] Built RationaleReader (195ms) +Build completed successfully (3 jobs). +info: RationaleReader: no previous manifest, creating one from scratch +info: toolchain not updated; already up-to-date diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7fd934a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +RationaleReader.original_comparison : + RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ + RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency +'RationaleReader.original_comparison' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample : + RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ + RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) ≠ + RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) +'RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted : + ¬∀ (n : Nat), RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial n) = n +'RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] +RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained : + RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) = + RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) +'RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct : + RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency ∧ + ¬RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.stricterLatency +'RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P +'RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.encoded_statement : 0 ≤ 1 +'RationaleReader.encoded_statement' does not depend on any axioms +RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted : ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 +'RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] +RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim : 0 ≤ 1 ∧ ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 +'RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim' depends on axioms: [propext] +RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case : + RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] +'RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case' does not depend on any axioms diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..44fcf2d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,2653 @@ +{ + "passed": false, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": false, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "stale", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [ + "Current source or adopted baseline drift: historical kernel evidence remains separate; current manuscript is stale" + ], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "stale" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "973288f219afd1356b518894640b5d9035fe669cb5889759471ede2d0a443464" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "actual_summary_sha256": "5432b70b55389b0069c5669dd519b81788dfe9e7c12654d3c11902e5db3c6e2a", + "checker_sha256": { + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "0e3e2ced77940ece0d2a6bebbb585afce0f0ce14d99cd880215ac7b560e976d1", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" + } +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9cc82ed --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean @@ -0,0 +1,105 @@ +namespace RationaleReader + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison +rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +end RationaleReader diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b7ceaf5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +name = "RationaleReader" +version = "0.0.1" +defaultTargets = ["RationaleReader"] +[[lean_lib]] +name = "RationaleReader" diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a8afa7d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..533ec56 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json @@ -0,0 +1,4155 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "repository_root": "../../..", + "source_current": { + "path": "../../../docs/rationale.md", + "sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44" + }, + "baseline_current": { + "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" + }, + "code_files": [ + { + "path": "leanified/RationaleReader.lean", + "sha256": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + } + ], + "review": { + "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", + "sha256": "862a6a182d6e1eb060557f2e1e7d7e424162ecae9da7a01885473730840138b0" + }, + "views": { + "overview_en": { + "path": "readers/en/rationale-overview.md", + "sha256": "f58fc391ade4b2fc798631020a6d856212854893a16a9f47893de5804e2d1002" + }, + "details_en": { + "path": "readers/en/rationale-details.md", + "sha256": "22bf07d6fb1258f45a16d7e695171ffe8df6c9c0eac84aceefc679e001e74759" + }, + "overview_zh": { + "path": "readers/zh/rationale-overview.md", + "sha256": "ba78b6fb1724f4277bd327564fced7f9a7537f331c2c5d1141ed228fdb20add8" + }, + "details_zh": { + "path": "readers/zh/rationale-details.md", + "sha256": "10e79091114b0159fec9b7c967480b022985049e04a33f7c33c70bd9655fd209" + } + }, + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "unit": "rationale.L1", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "# Organon Rationale\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "unit": "rationale.L2", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L3", + "clause": "r-3-c1", + "excerpt": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L3", + "clause": "r-3-c2", + "excerpt": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "unit": "rationale.L4", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L5", + "clause": "r-5-c1", + "excerpt": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L5", + "clause": "r-5-c2", + "excerpt": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L5", + "clause": "r-5-c3", + "excerpt": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "unit": "rationale.L6", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "unit": "rationale.L7", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "unit": "rationale.L8", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "unit": "rationale.L9", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "unit": "rationale.L10", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c1", + "excerpt": "Generative Drive", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c2", + "excerpt": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c3", + "excerpt": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L11", + "clause": "r-11-c4", + "excerpt": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L12", + "clause": "r-12-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L12", + "clause": "r-12-c2", + "excerpt": "Charter, unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L12", + "clause": "r-12-c3", + "excerpt": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c3", + "excerpt": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L13", + "clause": "r-13-c4", + "excerpt": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c1", + "excerpt": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c2", + "excerpt": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c3", + "excerpt": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c4", + "excerpt": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L14", + "clause": "r-14-c5", + "excerpt": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c3", + "excerpt": "The provision and its conditions remain.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L15", + "clause": "r-15-c4", + "excerpt": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c1", + "excerpt": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c2", + "excerpt": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c3", + "excerpt": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L16", + "clause": "r-16-c4", + "excerpt": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "unit": "rationale.L17", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "unit": "rationale.L18", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "unit": "rationale.L19", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "unit": "rationale.L20", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.1 Commitments and Objections\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "unit": "rationale.L21", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L22", + "clause": "r-22-c1", + "excerpt": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L22", + "clause": "r-22-c2", + "excerpt": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "unit": "rationale.L23", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "unit": "rationale.L24", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "unit": "rationale.L25", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c2", + "excerpt": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c3", + "excerpt": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c4", + "excerpt": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c5", + "excerpt": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L26", + "clause": "r-26-c6", + "excerpt": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c2", + "excerpt": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c3", + "excerpt": "This supports examining their compatibility.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c4", + "excerpt": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c5", + "excerpt": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L27", + "clause": "r-27-c6", + "excerpt": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c1", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c2", + "excerpt": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c3", + "excerpt": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c4", + "excerpt": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L28", + "clause": "r-28-c5", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c2", + "excerpt": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c3", + "excerpt": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c4", + "excerpt": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c5", + "excerpt": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L29", + "clause": "r-29-c6", + "excerpt": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c2", + "excerpt": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c3", + "excerpt": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c4", + "excerpt": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c5", + "excerpt": "They are not disallowed;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c6", + "excerpt": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L30", + "clause": "r-30-c7", + "excerpt": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "unit": "rationale.L31", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L32", + "clause": "r-32-c1", + "excerpt": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L32", + "clause": "r-32-c2", + "excerpt": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L32", + "clause": "r-32-c3", + "excerpt": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "unit": "rationale.L33", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "unit": "rationale.L34", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "unit": "rationale.L35", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L36", + "clause": "r-36-c1", + "excerpt": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L36", + "clause": "r-36-c2", + "excerpt": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L36", + "clause": "r-36-c3", + "excerpt": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "unit": "rationale.L37", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c1", + "excerpt": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c2", + "excerpt": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c3", + "excerpt": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c4", + "excerpt": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L38", + "clause": "r-38-c5", + "excerpt": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "unit": "rationale.L39", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c1", + "excerpt": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c2", + "excerpt": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c3", + "excerpt": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c4", + "excerpt": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L40", + "clause": "r-40-c5", + "excerpt": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "unit": "rationale.L41", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "unit": "rationale.L42", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.3 Assessment Tools\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "unit": "rationale.L43", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c1", + "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c2", + "excerpt": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c3", + "excerpt": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L44", + "clause": "r-44-c4", + "excerpt": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "unit": "rationale.L45", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "unit": "rationale.L46", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "unit": "rationale.L47", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c1", + "excerpt": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c2", + "excerpt": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c3", + "excerpt": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c4", + "excerpt": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c5", + "excerpt": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c6", + "excerpt": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c7", + "excerpt": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "unit": "rationale.L48", + "clause": "r-48-c8", + "excerpt": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "unit": "rationale.L49", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c1", + "excerpt": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c2", + "excerpt": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c3", + "excerpt": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c4", + "excerpt": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L50", + "clause": "r-50-c5", + "excerpt": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "unit": "rationale.L51", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "unit": "rationale.L52", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 3. Removal Check\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "unit": "rationale.L53", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "unit": "rationale.L54", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "unit": "rationale.L55", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L56", + "clause": "r-56-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L56", + "clause": "r-56-c2", + "excerpt": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L56", + "clause": "r-56-c3", + "excerpt": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c1", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c2", + "excerpt": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c3", + "excerpt": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L57", + "clause": "r-57-c4", + "excerpt": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L58", + "clause": "r-58-c1", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L58", + "clause": "r-58-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L58", + "clause": "r-58-c3", + "excerpt": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L59", + "clause": "r-59-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L59", + "clause": "r-59-c2", + "excerpt": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L60", + "clause": "r-60-c1", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L60", + "clause": "r-60-c2", + "excerpt": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "unit": "rationale.L61", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L62", + "clause": "r-62-c1", + "excerpt": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L62", + "clause": "r-62-c2", + "excerpt": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L62", + "clause": "r-62-c3", + "excerpt": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "unit": "rationale.L63", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "unit": "rationale.L64", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 4. Illustrative Cases\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "unit": "rationale.L65", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L66", + "clause": "r-66-c1", + "excerpt": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L66", + "clause": "r-66-c2", + "excerpt": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L66", + "clause": "r-66-c3", + "excerpt": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "unit": "rationale.L67", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "unit": "rationale.L68", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Case | Judgment and limits |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "unit": "rationale.L69", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L70", + "clause": "r-70-c1", + "excerpt": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L70", + "clause": "r-70-c2", + "excerpt": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L70", + "clause": "r-70-c3", + "excerpt": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L71", + "clause": "r-71-c1", + "excerpt": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L71", + "clause": "r-71-c2", + "excerpt": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L71", + "clause": "r-71-c3", + "excerpt": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L72", + "clause": "r-72-c1", + "excerpt": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L72", + "clause": "r-72-c2", + "excerpt": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L73", + "clause": "r-73-c1", + "excerpt": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L73", + "clause": "r-73-c2", + "excerpt": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L73", + "clause": "r-73-c3", + "excerpt": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L74", + "clause": "r-74-c1", + "excerpt": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L74", + "clause": "r-74-c2", + "excerpt": "This violates internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L74", + "clause": "r-74-c3", + "excerpt": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L75", + "clause": "r-75-c1", + "excerpt": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L75", + "clause": "r-75-c2", + "excerpt": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L76", + "clause": "r-76-c1", + "excerpt": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L76", + "clause": "r-76-c2", + "excerpt": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L76", + "clause": "r-76-c3", + "excerpt": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c1", + "excerpt": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c2", + "excerpt": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c3", + "excerpt": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", + "countermodel": { + "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "verification": "passed", + "target": "refuted", + "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", + "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." + } + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c4", + "excerpt": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L78", + "clause": "r-78-c1", + "excerpt": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L78", + "clause": "r-78-c2", + "excerpt": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L78", + "clause": "r-78-c3", + "excerpt": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c1", + "excerpt": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c2", + "excerpt": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c3", + "excerpt": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L79", + "clause": "r-79-c4", + "excerpt": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L80", + "clause": "r-80-c1", + "excerpt": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L80", + "clause": "r-80-c2", + "excerpt": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L80", + "clause": "r-80-c3", + "excerpt": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c1", + "excerpt": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c2", + "excerpt": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c3", + "excerpt": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L81", + "clause": "r-81-c4", + "excerpt": "These capability definitions come from the application.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c1", + "excerpt": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c2", + "excerpt": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c3", + "excerpt": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L82", + "clause": "r-82-c4", + "excerpt": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c1", + "excerpt": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c2", + "excerpt": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c3", + "excerpt": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L83", + "clause": "r-83-c4", + "excerpt": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L84", + "clause": "r-84-c1", + "excerpt": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L84", + "clause": "r-84-c2", + "excerpt": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L85", + "clause": "r-85-c1", + "excerpt": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L85", + "clause": "r-85-c2", + "excerpt": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L85", + "clause": "r-85-c3", + "excerpt": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L86", + "clause": "r-86-c1", + "excerpt": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L86", + "clause": "r-86-c2", + "excerpt": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L86", + "clause": "r-86-c3", + "excerpt": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L87", + "clause": "r-87-c1", + "excerpt": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L87", + "clause": "r-87-c2", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L87", + "clause": "r-87-c3", + "excerpt": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L88", + "clause": "r-88-c1", + "excerpt": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L88", + "clause": "r-88-c2", + "excerpt": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L88", + "clause": "r-88-c3", + "excerpt": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c1", + "excerpt": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c2", + "excerpt": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c3", + "excerpt": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L89", + "clause": "r-89-c4", + "excerpt": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L90", + "clause": "r-90-c1", + "excerpt": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L90", + "clause": "r-90-c2", + "excerpt": "Renaming alone adds no support.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L90", + "clause": "r-90-c3", + "excerpt": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "unit": "rationale.L91", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "unit": "rationale.L92", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "unit": "rationale.L93", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c1", + "excerpt": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c3", + "excerpt": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c4", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L94", + "clause": "r-94-c5", + "excerpt": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "unit": "rationale.L95", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c1", + "excerpt": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c2", + "excerpt": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c3", + "excerpt": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L96", + "clause": "r-96-c4", + "excerpt": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "unit": "rationale.L97", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L98", + "clause": "r-98-c1", + "excerpt": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L98", + "clause": "r-98-c2", + "excerpt": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L98", + "clause": "r-98-c3", + "excerpt": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "unit": "rationale.L99", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "unit": "rationale.L100", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "unit": "rationale.L101", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L102", + "clause": "r-102-c1", + "excerpt": "The following are hypothetical applications.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L102", + "clause": "r-102-c2", + "excerpt": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L102", + "clause": "r-102-c3", + "excerpt": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "unit": "rationale.L103", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "unit": "rationale.L104", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 6.1 Research Team\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "unit": "rationale.L105", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "unit": "rationale.L106", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "unit": "rationale.L107", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L108", + "clause": "r-108-c1", + "excerpt": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L108", + "clause": "r-108-c2", + "excerpt": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c1", + "excerpt": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c2", + "excerpt": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c3", + "excerpt": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c4", + "excerpt": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L109", + "clause": "r-109-c5", + "excerpt": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c1", + "excerpt": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c2", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c3", + "excerpt": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c4", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c5", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L110", + "clause": "r-110-c6", + "excerpt": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c1", + "excerpt": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c2", + "excerpt": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c3", + "excerpt": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c4", + "excerpt": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c5", + "excerpt": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L111", + "clause": "r-111-c6", + "excerpt": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c1", + "excerpt": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c2", + "excerpt": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c3", + "excerpt": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c4", + "excerpt": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c5", + "excerpt": "the number of labels alone cannot.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c6", + "excerpt": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c7", + "excerpt": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "unit": "rationale.L112", + "clause": "r-112-c8", + "excerpt": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "unit": "rationale.L113", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "unit": "rationale.L114", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "### 6.2 Software System\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "unit": "rationale.L115", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "unit": "rationale.L116", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "unit": "rationale.L117", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L118", + "clause": "r-118-c1", + "excerpt": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L118", + "clause": "r-118-c2", + "excerpt": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c1", + "excerpt": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c2", + "excerpt": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c3", + "excerpt": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c4", + "excerpt": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c5", + "excerpt": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c6", + "excerpt": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c7", + "excerpt": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c1", + "excerpt": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c2", + "excerpt": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c3", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c4", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c5", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L120", + "clause": "r-120-c6", + "excerpt": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c1", + "excerpt": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c2", + "excerpt": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c3", + "excerpt": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", + "countermodel": { + "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "verification": "passed", + "target": "refuted", + "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", + "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." + } + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c4", + "excerpt": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c5", + "excerpt": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c1", + "excerpt": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c2", + "excerpt": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c3", + "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c4", + "excerpt": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c5", + "excerpt": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L122", + "clause": "r-122-c6", + "excerpt": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "unit": "rationale.L123", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L124", + "clause": "r-124-c1", + "excerpt": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L124", + "clause": "r-124-c2", + "excerpt": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L124", + "clause": "r-124-c3", + "excerpt": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "unit": "rationale.L125", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "unit": "rationale.L126", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "unit": "rationale.L127", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L128", + "clause": "r-128-c1", + "excerpt": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L128", + "clause": "r-128-c2", + "excerpt": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "unit": "rationale.L129", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "unit": "rationale.L130", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "unit": "rationale.L131", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c1", + "excerpt": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c2", + "excerpt": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c3", + "excerpt": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c4", + "excerpt": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L132", + "clause": "r-132-c5", + "excerpt": "Another project could select a different language.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-c1", + "excerpt": "A text-centered core and script-free skills", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-c2", + "excerpt": "The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-c3", + "excerpt": "Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-c4", + "excerpt": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-c5", + "excerpt": "Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L133", + "clause": "r-133-c6", + "excerpt": "their absence here is a design choice.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c1", + "excerpt": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c2", + "excerpt": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c3", + "excerpt": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c4", + "excerpt": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L134", + "clause": "r-134-c5", + "excerpt": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c1", + "excerpt": "`organon-core-principled-review`", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c2", + "excerpt": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c3", + "excerpt": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c4", + "excerpt": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c5", + "excerpt": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L135", + "clause": "r-135-c6", + "excerpt": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c1", + "excerpt": "External `grill-me/grilling`", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c2", + "excerpt": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c3", + "excerpt": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c4", + "excerpt": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L136", + "clause": "r-136-c5", + "excerpt": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c1", + "excerpt": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c2", + "excerpt": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c3", + "excerpt": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c4", + "excerpt": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c5", + "excerpt": "A consensus is not proof.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "unit": "rationale.L137", + "clause": "r-137-c6", + "excerpt": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c1", + "excerpt": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c2", + "excerpt": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c3", + "excerpt": "These are contextual method requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L138", + "clause": "r-138-c4", + "excerpt": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c1", + "excerpt": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c2", + "excerpt": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c3", + "excerpt": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c4", + "excerpt": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "unit": "rationale.L139", + "clause": "r-139-c5", + "excerpt": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "unit": "rationale.L140", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c1", + "excerpt": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c2", + "excerpt": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c3", + "excerpt": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L141", + "clause": "r-141-c4", + "excerpt": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "unit": "rationale.L142", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c1", + "excerpt": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c2", + "excerpt": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c3", + "excerpt": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "unit": "rationale.L143", + "clause": "r-143-c4", + "excerpt": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "pending", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6768014 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md @@ -0,0 +1,8501 @@ +> Historical reader of the frozen rationale before the Core tooling migration; these are historical judgments, not current source approval. + +# Rationale — Lean line explanations + +Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`. [Frozen source](../../snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](../../manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](rationale-overview.md). + +These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. + +No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. + +Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-68). + + +```lean +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-73). + + +```lean +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-78). + + +```lean +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-87). + + +```lean +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-60). + + +```lean +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-31). + + +```lean +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-46). + + +```lean +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-54). + + +```lean +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-101). + + +```lean +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + +### r-133-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A text-centered core and script-free skills +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-133-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-133-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-133-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-133-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-133-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their absence here is a design choice. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## Complete checked code and line explanations + +Code SHA256: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7`. The initial translation was saved before source comparison; the current code revision below has an explicitly informed update. + + +```lean +namespace RationaleReader + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison +rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +end RationaleReader +``` + + + + + **L1** Open the RationaleReader namespace. + + + + **L3** Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. + + + + **L4** Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. + + + + **L5** Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. + + + + **L6** Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. + + + + **L8** Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. + + + + **L10** Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. + + + + **L12** Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. + + + + **L14** Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. + + + + **L16** Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. + + + + **L17** Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. + + + + **L18** Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. + + + + **L19** Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. + + + + **L21** Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. + + + + **L23** Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. + + + + **L25** Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. + + + + **L26** Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. + + + + **L28** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L29** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L30** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L31** State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. + + + + **L32** Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. + + + + **L33** Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). + + + + **L35** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L36** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L37** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L38** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L39** Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. + + + + **L40** The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. + + + + **L41** The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. + + + + **L43** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L44** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L45** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L46** State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. + + + + **L47** Assume this universal equality for contradiction. + + + + **L48** Specialize it to 11. + + + + **L49** Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. + + + + **L51** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L52** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L53** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L54** Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. + + + + **L55** Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. + + + + **L57** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L58** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L59** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L60** Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. + + + + **L61** State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. + + + + **L62** Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. + + + + **L63** Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. + + + + **L65** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L66** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L67** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L68** For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. + + + + **L70** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L71** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L72** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L73** Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. + + + + **L75** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L76** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L77** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L78** State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. + + + + **L79** Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. + + + + **L80** Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. + + + + **L81** Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. + + + + **L82** In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. + + + + **L84** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L85** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L86** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L87** Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. + + + + **L88** State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. + + + + **L89** Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. + + + + **L91** Define originalStates as the singleton state list [initial], whose only state has fields (10, 10). + + + + **L93** Define revisedStates as [initial, updateOnly initial 11], keeping the exact original state and appending the state (11, 10). This is a list of pure states, not an execution trace with timing. + + + + **L95** Define compareReads from a finite ServiceState list to a finite list of pairs of natural numbers; × denotes the product type. + + + + **L96** Map each state to its direct and cachedRead projections in that order. List.map preserves list order and length. The function records pairs; it does not itself test equality or decide equivalence. + + + + **L98** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L99** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L100** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L101** Begin a concrete theorem recording the outputs for the original and revised state lists. + + + + **L102** The first conjunct says compareReads on originalStates is exactly the singleton pair list [(10, 10)]. + + + + **L103** The second says the revised output is exactly [(10, 10), (11, 10)]. Decide computes both equalities. The old agreeing pair is retained and the new disagreeing pair is present; no service repair is claimed. + + + + **L105** Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6806f70 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,8724 @@ +> Historical reader of the frozen rationale before the Core tooling migration; these are historical judgments, not current source approval. + +# Rationale — claim overview + +Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`. [Frozen source](../../snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](../../manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](rationale-details.md). + +These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. + +No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. + +Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-1) + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-2) + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-3-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-3-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-4) + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-6) + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-7) + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-8) + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-9) + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-10) + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-17) + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-18) + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-19) + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-20) + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-21) + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-22-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-22-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-23) + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-24) + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-25) + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-31) + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-33) + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-34) + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-35) + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-37) + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-39) + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-41) + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-42) + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-43) + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-45) + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-46) + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-47) + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-49) + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-51) + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-52) + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-53) + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-54) + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-55) + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-59-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-59-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-60-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-60-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-61) + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-63) + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-64) + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-65) + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-67) + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-68) + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-69) + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-72-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-72-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-75-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-75-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-68). + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-73). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-78). + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-87). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-84-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-84-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-91) + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-92) + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-93) + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-95) + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-97) + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-99) + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-100) + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-101) + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-103) + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-104) + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-105) + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-106) + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-107) + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-108-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-108-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-113) + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-114) + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-115) + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-116) + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-117) + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-118-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-118-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-60). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-31). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-46). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-54). + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-101). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-123) + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-125) + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-126) + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-127) + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-128-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-128-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-129) + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-130) + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-131) + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + +### r-133-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A text-centered core and script-free skills +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their absence here is a design choice. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-140) + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-142) + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c4) + + diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5e90ca0 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md @@ -0,0 +1,10319 @@ +> 本稿保留 Core 工具下沉前的 rationale 冻结版本及历史判断，不表示当前源文已获认可。 + +# Rationale——Lean 逐行详解 + +当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`。[冻结源文](../../snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](rationale-overview.md)。 + +本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 + +条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 + +条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-68). + + +```lean +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-73). + + +```lean +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-78). + + +```lean +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-87). + + +```lean +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-60). + + +```lean +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-31). + + +```lean +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-46). + + +```lean +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-54). + + +```lean +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-101). + + +```lean +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + +### r-133-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A text-centered core and script-free skills +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their absence here is a design choice. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## 完整受检代码与逐行解释 + +Code SHA256: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7`. 初始回译先于来源比较保存；以下当前代码修订采用明确标注的知情增量解释。 + + +```lean +namespace RationaleReader + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison +rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +end RationaleReader +``` + + + + + **L1** 打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 + + + + **L3** 声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 + + + + **L4** 声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 + + + + **L5** 声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 + + + + **L6** 通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 + + + + **L8** 将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + + + + **L10** 将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + + + + **L12** 将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 + + + + **L14** 将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 + + + + **L16** 声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 + + + + **L17** 声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 + + + + **L18** 声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 + + + + **L19** 声明 budget，取任意自然数。 + + + + **L21** 将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 + + + + **L23** 将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 + + + + **L25** 开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 + + + + **L26** 使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 + + + + **L28** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L29** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L30** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L31** 陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 + + + + **L32** 将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 + + + + **L33** 通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 + + + + **L35** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L36** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L37** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L38** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L39** 开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 + + + + **L40** 第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 + + + + **L41** 第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 + + + + **L43** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L44** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L45** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L46** 陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 + + + + **L47** 为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 + + + + **L48** 将其用于 11。 + + + + **L49** 展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 + + + + **L51** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L52** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L53** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L54** 开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 + + + + **L55** 计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 + + + + **L57** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L58** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L59** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L60** 开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 + + + + **L61** 陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 + + + + **L62** 将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 + + + + **L63** 计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 + + + + **L65** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L66** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L67** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L68** 对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 + + + + **L70** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L71** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L72** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L73** 通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 + + + + **L75** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L76** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L77** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L78** 陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 + + + + **L79** 为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 + + + + **L80** 将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 + + + + **L81** 利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 + + + + **L82** 在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 + + + + **L84** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L85** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L86** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L87** 开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 + + + + **L88** 同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 + + + + **L89** 复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 + + + + **L91** 将 originalStates 定义为单元素状态列表 [initial]，唯一状态的字段为 (10, 10)。 + + + + **L93** 将 revisedStates 定义为 [initial, updateOnly initial 11]，保留同一初始状态并追加状态 (11, 10)；这是纯状态列表，而非带时间的执行轨迹。 + + + + **L95** 定义 compareReads，将有限 ServiceState 列表映射为有限自然数对列表；× 表示积类型。 + + + + **L96** 依次将各状态映射为其 direct、cachedRead 投影组成的数对；List.map 保持列表顺序和长度。此函数记录数对，本身不检查相等或判定等价。 + + + + **L98** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L99** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L100** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L101** 开始一个具体定理，记录原状态列表和修订状态列表的输出。 + + + + **L102** 第一个合取项陈述 compareReads 在 originalStates 上恰得到单元素数对列表 [(10, 10)]。 + + + + **L103** 第二个合取项陈述修订输出恰为 [(10, 10), (11, 10)]；decide 计算两个等式。原有相等数对被保留，新增不等数对也在结果中；没有声称服务已修复。 + + + + **L105** 关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..7972ea7 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,10542 @@ +> 本稿保留 Core 工具下沉前的 rationale 冻结版本及历史判断，不表示当前源文已获认可。 + +# Rationale——逐主张速览 + +当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`。[冻结源文](../../snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](rationale-details.md)。 + +本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 + +条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 + +条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-1) + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-2) + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-3-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-3-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-4) + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-6) + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-7) + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-8) + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-9) + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-10) + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-17) + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-18) + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-19) + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-20) + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-21) + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-22-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-22-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-23) + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-24) + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-25) + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-31) + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-33) + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-34) + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-35) + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-37) + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-39) + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-41) + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-42) + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-43) + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-45) + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-46) + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-47) + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-49) + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-51) + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-52) + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-53) + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-54) + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-55) + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-59-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-59-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-60-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-60-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-61) + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-63) + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-64) + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-65) + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-67) + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-68) + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-69) + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-72-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-72-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-75-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-75-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-68). + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-73). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-78). + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-87). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-84-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-84-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-91) + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-92) + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-93) + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-95) + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-97) + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-99) + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-100) + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-101) + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-103) + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-104) + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-105) + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-106) + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-107) + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-108-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-108-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-113) + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-114) + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-115) + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-116) + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-117) + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-118-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-118-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-60). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-31). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-46). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-54). + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-101). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-123) + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-125) + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-126) + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-127) + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-128-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-128-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-129) + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-130) + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-131) + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + +### r-133-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A text-centered core and script-free skills +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-133-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their absence here is a design choice. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-140) + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-142) + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c4) + + diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b4878d8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,900 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `ba7456d7a43ecc0a49398111904a9e5d75f421393ee4bc179da37850c80c9759`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Initial blind explanation of two Lean readers (English) + +Frozen initial artifact, prepared from code only with `organon-lean-natural-language --explain-lines`. Source fidelity is unevaluated. Mapping comments were treated solely as identifiers. + +## Input boundary and checked environment + +The translator received these two encodings, the task, the natural-language skill, and their lean-toolchain/lakefile.toml files. Automatic context also exposed repository AGENTS workflow instructions, project paths, a skills catalog, and parent status messages saying a later revision might be needed. It did not expose PHILOSOPHY text, rationale source text, source snapshots, run.json, source-first assessments, prior iteration records, or author correspondence explanations. Those were not retrieved. The AGENTS request to read philosophical source was intentionally not followed for this explicitly code-only task. A parent notice of later possible revision arrived after the semantic line explanations had been drafted; no changed input was read. + +Installed Lean reported: `Lean (version 4.33.1, arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0, commit 819816b2e0a3bf405af45ae5c7af2491d8f5bee6, Release)`. Both projects declare `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1`, one lean_lib apiece, and no package dependencies. The files contain no explicit imports, so Lean supplies its standard Init environment. For each file an exact source copy followed only by `#print axioms` for every declared top-level definition, type, structure, and theorem was checked with this version; both exited 0. Original code was not edited. Audit copies and logs are beside this document. This was actual elaboration/kernel checking plus an axiom audit, not a philosophical or source-fidelity check. + +Input SHA-256 values: + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b` + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6` + + + +## Shared semantic conventions + +All explicitly named parameters are universally quantified when a declaration is used generally. Unannotated binders have types inferred from use: aspect is Aspect, and context/n are Nat in these files. No declarations introduce user axioms, sorry, typeclass premises, extra imported theories, abstract support relations with hidden interpretations, or implicit philosophical assumptions. Core decidability instances support concrete equality, order, conjunction, negation, and membership computations. Generated instances are not premises supplied by a domain user. Constructors preceded by a dot use their expected inductive type. + +`Prop` is the type of propositions. `A → B` assumes a proof of A to produce B; `¬ A` means A → False. `∧` needs both proofs, `∨` needs one chosen branch, and `↔` needs implication both ways. `∀` quantifies over its full inferred domain; `∀ n ∈ xs, P n` abbreviates a universal implication from membership. Equality is Lean equality; a Boolean polarity is data, not itself truth or falsity of an external claim. Lists are finite ordered collections with possible repetitions. Field projections `.1`/`.2` extract conjunction components in the displayed proof terms. `rfl` proves definitional equality; `Iff.rfl` proves reflexive equivalence; `decide` computes a decidable proposition. `simp` unfolds the named definitions and applies available simplification lemmas. `intro` takes an arbitrary quantified input or an implication premise; `cases` eliminates constructors, including impossible equalities. No computational success validates an interpretation of the declared names. + +## Code-derived claims + +### CoreReader: Applicability and ignored labels + +Duties is an obligation predicate: for each of the three Aspect values, applicability to the selected natural-number claim implies examination at exactly the selected claim and grounds identifiers. Both supplied predicates are arbitrary. Assessed is just Duties with an unused list parameter. mixed_projection assumes Duties and applicability of empirical and value, then obtains the two examination facts by implication elimination; it does not establish the assumed obligation. labels_do_not_waive is reflexive equivalence of definitionally identical expressions. The definitions force label independence. Neither theorem shows that a supplied applicability or examination predicate faithfully represents an external assessment. No aspect applicable means Duties holds vacuously, and an always-true examination predicate makes it hold for any applicability predicate. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:3` (lines 3–24). + +```lean + +inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value + deriving DecidableEq + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect + +def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + Duties applicable examined claim grounds + +def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:29` (lines 29–31). + +```lean + +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:36` (lines 36–38). + +```lean + +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl + +``` + +### CoreReader: Three fixed predicate fixtures + +mixedClaim applies only to claim 7 and the empirical and value constructors. bothExamined holds only at claim 7 and grounds 3 for those same two constructors; empiricalOnly permits just empirical. complete_mixed_fixture constructs the required conjunctions at 7 and 3. empirical_only_rejected assumes Duties and obtains the impossible equality value = empirical. unrelated_grounds_rejected obtains 4 = 3 from the hard-coded grounds field. omitted_labels_still_rejected is exactly empirical_only_rejected after unfolding Assessed with an empty label list. These are constructive examples over chosen numeral identifiers. The numeral mismatch has no independently defined semantic relevance relation, and the code supplies no general procedure for finding applicable aspects or adequate grounds. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:43` (lines 43–45). + +```lean + +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:50` (lines 50–53). + +```lean + +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:58` (lines 58–61). + +```lean + +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:66` (lines 66–67). + +```lean + +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected + +``` + +### CoreReader: A finite token relation and same-context exclusion + +Fact is a five-token enumeration, with no formula syntax or valuation. In particular, pImpliesQ is not an implication and notQ is not negation. fixtureConsequence is a hand-written relation: at context 0, true requires membership of both p and pImpliesQ, while false requires notQ; context 1 has only the positiveInOne true branch; context 2 has only the negativeInTwo false branch. All other contexts fail. Consistent permits any supplied relation and means that true and false never both hold for one common context and the same token list. joint_conflict exhibits both at context 0 for the three-token list. withdrawn_current_set rules out all false branches of the shorter two-token list. distinct_contexts shows that the two singleton-style branches force an impossible common context 1 = 2. These theorems check this finite relation, not deductive closure of a general logic. Lists record no acquisition, withdrawal event, temporal history, or reasons for withdrawing a token. With an always-false consequence relation every held list is Consistent; with a relation true for both polarities at one context none is. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:69` (lines 69–82). + +```lean + +inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo + deriving DecidableEq + +def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ + (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ + (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ + (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:87` (lines 87–89). + +```lean + +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:94` (lines 94–96). + +```lean + +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:101` (lines 101–106). + +```lean + +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible + +``` + +### CoreReader: A Boolean condition on unequal lists + +ChangeReported before after claimsUnchanged means before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false. The concrete theorem rejects passing true for the two specified unequal lists by decidable computation. Lists, despite names containing set, are ordered and retain multiplicity: reordering or adding a duplicate can count as change here. Equal lists satisfy the implication vacuously even if the Boolean is true; a false Boolean always satisfies it. This is a Boolean admissibility condition and supplies no report contents, recipient, disclosure event, or evidence that anyone reports anything. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:111` (lines 111–112). + +```lean + +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:117` (lines 117–120). + +```lean + +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide + +``` + +### CoreReader: A missing natural number alongside independently true and false claims + +ObservationComplete observed requires every natural number to belong to a finite list. observation_gap refutes completeness of [0, 1] using 2. The code proves this one list's gap; in standard finite-list semantics no finite list contains all natural numbers, but that general statement is not a theorem in this file. gap_with_true_conclusion pairs the gap with ∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n, proved by reduction and reflexivity. gap_with_false_conclusion pairs it with ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0), refuted at 1. These are conjunctions with independent arithmetic results. They show this fixed membership gap coexists with a true selected universal statement and the falsity of another selected universal statement. No support relation connects the list to either statement; no observation reliability, induction rule, or general theory of evidential support is defined. The quantifier is over all Nat, not all members of the observed list. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:125` (lines 125–125). + +```lean + +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:130` (lines 130–133). + +```lean + +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:138` (lines 138–140). + +```lean + +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:145` (lines 145–150). + +```lean + +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad + +``` + +### CoreReader: A singleton passes an equation which fails universally + +proposedPrinciple is n + 1 = 2 * n over Nat; selfAssessmentSamples is [1]. The theorem proves every list member satisfies the equation, by reducing membership to n = 1 and computing. It refutes universal satisfaction by evaluating the assumed equation at 0, where 1 = 0 would follow. All variables here are natural numbers; the bounded syntax ∀ n ∈ samples expands to ∀ n, n ∈ samples → equation n. This is a finite-sample arithmetic counterexample. No self-assessment process, evaluator, philosophy object, or correctness relation is modeled; the declaration names do not add one. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–154). + +```lean + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +def selfAssessmentSamples : List Nat := [1] + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:159` (lines 159–169). + +```lean + +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + (∀ n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples, proposedPrinciple n) ∧ ¬ (∀ n, proposedPrinciple n) := by + constructor + · intro n hn + simp [selfAssessmentSamples] at hn + subst n + unfold proposedPrinciple + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [proposedPrinciple] at bad + +``` + +### RationaleReader: Record projections, fixed updates, and separate latency data + +ServiceState is a pair of arbitrary natural numbers. direct and cachedRead are pure field projections. updateOnly replaces acknowledged and preserves cached; updateInvalidating ignores its old state and constructs (n, n). initial is (10, 10). LatencyContext is a separate triple; originalLatency is (5, 2, 6) and stricterLatency is (5, 2, 3), in direct/cache/budget order. withinBudget means both latency fields are at most budget. original_comparison computes agreement at initial and the inequalities 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6. There are no constraints relating a state's values or update functions to the latency records. These numbers are constants, with no units, measured workloads, I/O, concurrent execution, or latency distribution. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:3` (lines 3–28). + +```lean + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def updateInvalidating (_s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := ⟨n, n⟩ + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:33` (lines 33–35). + +```lean + +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: A stale projection for one update and a false universal equality + +update_read_counterexample proves initial agreement at 10 and disagreement after updateOnly initial 11, whose fields are (11, 10). cached_freshness_refuted disproves ∀ n : Nat, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n by n = 11; the cached field remains 10. Thus the supplied universal equality fails in the explicitly constructed pure model. This is not a proof about all cache implementations, or a measured service failure. Neither theorem states a general implication from initial agreement to all subsequent agreement; the fixture instead supplies a concrete before/after contrast. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:41` (lines 41–43). + +```lean + +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:48` (lines 48–51). + +```lean + +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +``` + +### RationaleReader: Equal fields written directly; unchanged writes + +invalidation_restores_fixture computes that updateInvalidating initial 11 has both projections equal to 11, because the definition returns (11, 11). It models writing both values directly, not deletion of a cache entry or a protocol that later reloads one. unchanged_update_retained computes agreement after updateOnly initial 10, which preserves (10, 10). These theorems have no external premises and prove their particular numerical examples; neither claims a general temporal safety or invalidation theorem. The broader all-n equality for updateInvalidating follows from its definition, but is not the stated fixture theorem. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:56` (lines 56–57). + +```lean + +theorem invalidation_restores_fixture : + direct (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 ∧ cachedRead (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:62` (lines 62–63). + +```lean + +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: A budget-only change + +budget_change_is_distinct proves withinBudget (5, 2, 6) and not withinBudget (5, 2, 3). Both fixed latency numbers stay the same; the direct value 5 exceeds the smaller budget 3 although cache value 2 remains within it. The proof unfolds the predicate and computes. There is no causal claim that the service changed, no universal performance result, and no theorem connecting this budget condition to the separate cached-value disagreement. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:68` (lines 68–71). + +```lean + +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +``` + +### RationaleReader: An identity proof with a supplied proposition + +namedUniversalTruth explicitly quantifies over a proposition P and its assumed proof h : P, then returns exactly h. Its content is ∀ P : Prop, P → P. There are no hidden typeclass assumptions and no proof that an arbitrary proposition is true without h. In particular, the name does not create universal truth, philosophical correctness, or correspondence to any prose statement. This is the identity function on proofs. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:76` (lines 76–76). + +```lean + +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +``` + +### RationaleReader: One specific inequality and a different false generalization + +encoded_statement computes the single true inequality (0 : Nat) ≤ 1. different_statement_refuted refutes ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 at 2; case analysis of Nat's inductive ≤ proof reduces the impossible 2 ≤ 1 to an impossible 2 ≤ 0 case. proof_of_different_claim pairs the earlier results. It does not obtain the universal claim from the specific one. This proves a precise true/false contrast between two arithmetic statements, without a semantic encoding function or general theorem about the fidelity of formalization. + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:81` (lines 81–81). + +```lean + +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:86` (lines 86–90). + +```lean + +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +``` + +Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:95` (lines 95–97). + +```lean + +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +``` + +## Actual dependency audit + +The following checked declarations depend on Lean core `propext` (propositional extensionality, allowing equivalent propositions to be identified): `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected`, `CoreReader.joint_conflict`, `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set`, `CoreReader.distinct_contexts`, `CoreReader.observation_gap`, `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion`, `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion`, `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness`, `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted`, `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted`, and `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim`. Every other top-level declaration audited in the two files reported no axioms. The complete declaration-by-declaration output is in `CoreReader.audit.log` and `RationaleReader.audit.log`; these statements refer to the checked proof terms, including any dependency introduced by tactic-generated proofs. No claim is made that a listed axiom is required by every possible proof of the proposition. + +## Appendix: every nonblank source line + +Each numbered entry explains its actual line. Exact code is preserved in the excerpts above and the audit copies. Mapping comments supply metadata only. The machine-readable equivalent is `line-explanations.json`. + +### CoreReader.lean + +Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`; SHA-256 `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`. + +- L1: Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. + +- L3: Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. + +- L4: Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. + +- L6: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L7: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L8: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L9: Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + +- L10: Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. + +- L11: Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. + +- L13: Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. + +- L14: Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. + +- L15: Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. + +- L17: Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. + +- L18: It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. + +- L20: Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + +- L21: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. + +- L23: Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. + +- L24: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. + +- L26: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L27: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L28: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L29: Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. + +- L30: Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. + +- L31: Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. + +- L33: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L34: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L35: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L36: Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. + +- L37: Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. + +- L38: Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. + +- L40: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L41: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L42: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L43: State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. + +- L44: Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. + +- L45: Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. + +- L47: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L48: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L49: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L50: State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. + +- L51: Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. + +- L52: Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. + +- L53: Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. + +- L55: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L56: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L57: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L58: State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. + +- L59: Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. + +- L60: Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. + +- L61: Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. + +- L63: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L64: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L65: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L66: State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. + +- L67: Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. + +- L69: Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. + +- L70: Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. + +- L72: Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. + +- L73: The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. + +- L74: The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. + +- L75: A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. + +- L76: The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. + +- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L81: Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. + +- L82: Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. + +- L84: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L85: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L86: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L87: State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. + +- L88: Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. + +- L89: Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. + +- L91: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L92: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L93: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L94: State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. + +- L95: For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. + +- L96: Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. + +- L98: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L99: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L100: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L101: State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. + +- L102: Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. + +- L103: Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. + +- L104: Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. + +- L105: Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. + +- L106: Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. + +- L108: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L109: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L110: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L111: Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. + +- L112: Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. + +- L114: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L115: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L116: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L117: Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. + +- L118: State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. + +- L119: Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. + +- L120: Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. + +- L122: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L123: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L124: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L125: Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. + +- L127: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L128: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L129: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L130: State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. + +- L131: Assume completeness for contradiction. + +- L132: Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. + +- L133: Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. + +- L135: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L136: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L137: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L138: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. + +- L139: State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. + +- L140: Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. + +- L142: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L143: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L144: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L145: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. + +- L146: State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. + +- L147: Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. + +- L148: Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. + +- L149: Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. + +- L150: Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. + +- L152: Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. + +- L154: Define selfAssessmentSamples as the singleton natural-number list [1]. No assessment algorithm is encoded. + +- L156: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L157: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L158: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L159: Begin a theorem contrasting the fixed sample list with universal arithmetic validity. + +- L160: State that every member of [1] satisfies n + 1 = 2 * n, and that this equation does not hold for every natural number. The bounded quantifier expands to ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n. + +- L161: Split the conjunction into its sampled and universal-negation proof obligations. + +- L162: For the first obligation, introduce an arbitrary natural number n and its assumed sample-list membership hn. + +- L163: Unfold the singleton list and simplify membership, obtaining n = 1. + +- L164: Substitute 1 for n in the goal. + +- L165: Unfold proposedPrinciple to the arithmetic equation at 1. + +- L166: Prove the concrete equality 1 + 1 = 2 * 1 by decidable computation. + +- L167: For the second obligation, assume the equation holds at every natural number. + +- L168: Specialize the assumption to 0. + +- L169: Unfold and simplify the equation at 0, yielding the contradiction 1 = 0. + +- L171: Close the CoreReader namespace. + +### RationaleReader.lean + +Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`; SHA-256 `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`. + +- L1: Open the RationaleReader namespace. + +- L3: Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. + +- L4: Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. + +- L5: Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. + +- L6: Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. + +- L8: Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. + +- L10: Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. + +- L12: Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. + +- L14: Define updateInvalidating to ignore its old state entirely and return the pair (n, n). Despite its name, it directly writes both fields; it has no invalid marker, eviction, fetch, or invalidation protocol. + +- L16: Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. + +- L18: Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. + +- L19: Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. + +- L20: Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. + +- L21: Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. + +- L23: Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. + +- L25: Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. + +- L27: Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. + +- L28: Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. + +- L30: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L31: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L32: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L33: State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. + +- L34: Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. + +- L35: Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). + +- L37: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L38: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L39: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L40: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L41: Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. + +- L42: The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. + +- L43: The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. + +- L45: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L46: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L47: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L48: State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. + +- L49: Assume this universal equality for contradiction. + +- L50: Specialize it to 11. + +- L51: Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. + +- L53: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L54: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L55: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L56: Begin a concrete conjunction theorem about updateInvalidating initial 11. + +- L57: Prove by computation that both fields of the returned state are 11. This follows from construction of (11, 11), not a modeled cache invalidation process. + +- L59: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L60: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L61: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L62: Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. + +- L63: Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. + +- L65: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L66: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L67: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L68: Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. + +- L69: State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. + +- L70: Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. + +- L71: Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. + +- L73: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L74: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L75: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L76: For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. + +- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L81: Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. + +- L83: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L84: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L85: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L86: State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. + +- L87: Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. + +- L88: Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. + +- L89: Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. + +- L90: In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. + +- L92: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + +- L93: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + +- L94: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + +- L95: Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. + +- L96: State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. + +- L97: Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. + +- L99: Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c2eceb2 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md @@ -0,0 +1,477 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `2604d478b8cc776bd766a67a2edd4b27cd99f8b6c781d3f564fc751b0ae98425`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 两份 Lean 读者编码的初始盲解释（中文译稿） + +本稿翻译已经冻结的英文代码解释，没有读取来源原文或更新后的编码。英文初稿 initial.en.md 及其 SHA-256 保持不变；本稿不评估来源忠实性。 + +## 代码含义概览 + +CoreReader 的 Duties 是条件义务：对三个 Aspect 中的每个方面，若任意 supplied applicable 谓词判为适用，则同一主张及依据对应的 examined 关系必须成立。Assessed 完全忽略标签列表，因此标签不影响结果是定义直接决定的。具体示例用编号 7、3 及固定方面建立成立或不成立；编号 4 被拒绝来自 4 ≠ 3，不来自另外定义的相关性关系。 + +Fact 是五种标记，不含命题公式或逻辑赋值。fixtureConsequence 只有手写的三个语境分支；Consistent 排除同一语境中同一列表的两种布尔极性同时成立。具体定理证明该有限关系上的冲突、删除 notQ 后无负极性分支，以及不同语境不能成为同一语境；没有一般逻辑的演绎闭包或实际撤回过程。 + +ChangeReported 仅要求列表不等时布尔参数为 false，不含报告内容或行为。列表有序且允许重复；相同列表令蕴含空真。ObservationComplete 要求有限列表包含所有自然数；[0, 1] 在 2 处失败。其余两个定理将这项缺口分别与独立的算术真命题和假全称命题的否定组成合取，没有定义列表对结论的支持关系。 + +初始 selfAssessmentSamples 是 [1]，proposedPrinciple 是 n + 1 = 2 * n。证明在唯一样本 1 处成立，在 0 处失败；初始编码没有自评算法、评估者或哲学对象。 + +RationaleReader 的 ServiceState 只是两个自然数字段；direct 和 cachedRead 是纯投影，updateOnly 只写 acknowledged，初始 updateInvalidating 直接返回 (n, n)。这些是纯函数，没有 I/O、并发、失效标志或重新加载协议。具体例子证明 (10, 10) 初始一致，单字段改为 11 后成为 (11, 10)，两个字段直接写为 11 后一致，以及写回原值 10 后一致。 + +延迟记录独立于状态和更新函数。两个延迟恒为 5、2，预算从 6 改为 3 后，直接延迟不再达标；没有单位、测量或因果关系。namedUniversalTruth 对任意 P 和显式 h : P 直接返回 h，内容仅为 P → P。最后三个定理证明 0 ≤ 1，同时用 2 反驳所有自然数均 ≤ 1；没有语义编码函数或一般形式化忠实性定理。 + +## 检查及依赖 + +原始两个文件的逐字副本附加每个顶层声明的 #print axioms 后，均在 Lean 4.33.1 实际检查成功。部分证明依赖 Lean core 的 propext，其余已审计顶层声明无公理依赖。确切逐声明输出见同目录 CoreReader.audit.log、RationaleReader.audit.log；英文稿列出全部 propext 声明。检查仅证明这些形式命题的内核有效性，不证明哲学正确性或来源忠实性。 + +## 全部非空行解释 + +### CoreReader.lean + +路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`。 + +- L1：打开 CoreReader 命名空间；后续声明名带此前缀。 + +- L3：声明 Aspect 类型，恰有 empirical、inferential、value 三个互异的无参数构造子；名称本身没有定义领域含义。 + +- L4：生成 DecidableEq 实例，使任意两个 Aspect 值的相等性可计算判定。 + +- L6：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L7：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L8：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L9：开始定义命题 Duties，接收以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的任意适用性谓词 applicable。 + +- L10：再接收关于主张编号、依据编号和 Aspect 的任意三元谓词 examined，以及显式自然数参数 claim、grounds；未假设这些谓词具备任何性质。 + +- L11：Duties 表示：对每个 Aspect，若它适用于当前主张，则 examined 对同一主张、同一依据及该 Aspect 成立。没有任何适用方面时，此条件空真。 + +- L13：开始定义 Assessed，显式接收 Aspect 标签列表和任意适用性谓词；以下划线开头的标签参数未被使用。 + +- L14：接收 examined 谓词以及自然数主张、依据编号；返回命题。 + +- L15：将 Assessed 定义为这些谓词和编号对应的 Duties；标签既不限制也不加强该命题。 + +- L17：定义以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的 mixedClaim。 + +- L18：它恰在主张编号为 7 且方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；inferential 从不满足。 + +- L20：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 bothExamined。 + +- L21：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；合取向右嵌套。 + +- L23：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 empiricalOnly。 + +- L24：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 时成立；没有 value 或 inferential 分支。 + +- L26：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L27：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L28：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L29：开始一个对任意适用性谓词 a 和 examined 谓词 e 全称参数化的定理。 + +- L30：显式接收自然数 c、g，Duties a e c g 的假定证明 h，以及 empirical 和 value 适用于 c 的假定证明。 + +- L31：结论是在同一 c、g 上的两个 e 事实同时成立；分别把 h 用于 he、hv，再组成合取。下划线是推断出的 Aspect 实参；没有脱离这些前提建立任何 examination 事实。 + +- L33：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L34：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L35：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L36：开始一个关于任意两个标签列表 xs、ys 以及任意适用性谓词 a 的定理。 + +- L37：还量化 examined 谓词以及主张、依据编号。 + +- L38：用 Iff.rfl 证明两个 Assessed 命题等价：标签被忽略，两者都归约为同一 Duties 命题。这是定义恒等，不是关于标签的经验发现。 + +- L40：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L41：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L42：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L43：陈述具体谓词 mixedClaim、bothExamined 在主张 7、依据 3 处满足 Duties，并开始 tactic 证明。 + +- L44：引入任意方面 k 及 mixedClaim 7 k 的证明 hk。 + +- L45：构造 bothExamined 7 3 k：复用 hk 中的 7 = 7，用自反性证明 3 = 3，再复用 hk 中的方面析取。 + +- L47：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L48：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L49：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L50：陈述具体关系 empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处不满足 mixedClaim 的 Duties。 + +- L51：假设所否定的 Duties 命题，目标为推出 False。 + +- L52：把该假设用于 value；用 7 = 7 和右侧析取 value = value 建立适用性，得到 hv : empiricalOnly 7 3 value。 + +- L53：取出 hv 最内层的等式 value = empirical，利用两个 Aspect 构造子互异将其消去。 + +- L55：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L56：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L57：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L58：陈述在依据编号 4 而非 bothExamined 固定的 3 处，Duties 不成立。 + +- L59：为推出矛盾，假设主张 7、依据 4 处成立 Duties。 + +- L60：将其用于适用的 value 方面，得到 bothExamined 7 4 value。 + +- L61：消去得到的等式 4 = 3，即 hv.2.1。矛盾来自数值不等，而非单独定义的相关性概念。 + +- L63：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L64：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L65：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L66：陈述空标签列表无法使 mixedClaim、empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处的 Assessed 成立。 + +- L67：直接复用 empirical_only_rejected；展开 Assessed 后恰为此前定理否定的命题。 + +- L69：声明具有五个互异无参数构造子的 Fact 类型；pImpliesQ 是标记而非 Lean 蕴含，notQ 是标记而非逻辑否定。 + +- L70：生成 Fact 的可判定相等性，使具体列表成员关系可计算判定。 + +- L72：定义有限 Fact 标记列表、自然数语境和布尔极性之间的关系；列表不必无重复。 + +- L73：第一个语境 0 分支要求极性为 true 且 p、pImpliesQ 都属于列表，或者采用下一行的备选条件。 + +- L74：语境 0 的另一条件要求极性为 false 且 notQ 属于列表；此处结束语境 0 分支。 + +- L75：独立分支要求语境为 1、极性为 true 且 positiveInOne 属于列表。 + +- L76：最后一个分支要求语境为 2、极性为 false 且 negativeInTwo 属于列表；没有其他分支或推理规则。 + +- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L81：以所示类型的任意 consequence 关系及有限 Fact 标记列表定义 Consistent。 + +- L82：要求每个自然数语境中，同一列表的 true 和 false 两种极性不能同时满足该关系；未限制所传关系必须对应逻辑蕴涵。 + +- L84：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L85：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L86：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L87：陈述列表 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 在具体 fixtureConsequence 下不满足 Consistent。 + +- L88：为推出矛盾，假设该列表满足一致性条件。 + +- L89：将一致性条件用于语境 0，提供两种极性的证明；它们分别通过简化显式关系和具体列表成员关系得到。 + +- L91：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L92：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L93：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L94：陈述较短列表 [p, pImpliesQ] 在 fixtureConsequence 下满足一致性条件。 + +- L95：对任意语境，假设两种极性同时成立，目标为 False。 + +- L96：简化 false 极性的假设 h.2；列表中既没有 notQ 也没有 negativeInTwo，因此所有 false 分支都不可能。 + +- L98：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L99：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L100：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L101：陈述 [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] 在示例关系下满足一致性条件。 + +- L102：引入同一个语境，并假设两种极性都在其中成立。 + +- L103：简化 true 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 1。 + +- L104：简化 false 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 2。 + +- L105：把第一个等式反向后与第二个复合，得到不可能的自然数等式 1 = 2。 + +- L106：消去不可能的等式，完成矛盾证明。 + +- L108：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L109：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L110：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L111：以两个列表和名为 claimsUnchanged 的布尔值定义 ChangeReported；这些都是显式输入，没有时间、说话者或报告对象。 + +- L112：要求列表不等蕴含 claimsUnchanged = false；列表相等时条件空真。列表相等区分顺序和重复次数；false 不提供任何报告内容。 + +- L114：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L115：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L116：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L117：开始如下关于 ChangeReported 的具体否定定理。 + +- L118：陈述从 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 改为 [p, pImpliesQ] 且传入 true 时不满足 ChangeReported。 + +- L119：将 ChangeReported 展开为从列表不等到布尔等式的蕴含。 + +- L120：计算判定这个具体命题：列表不同，但 true 不等于 false。 + +- L122：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L123：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L124：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L125：定义 ObservationComplete observed 为每个自然数都属于有限列表 observed；未标注类型的 n 由成员关系推断为 Nat。没有建模观察过程。 + +- L127：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L128：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L129：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L130：陈述列表 [0, 1] 不包含全部自然数。 + +- L131：为推出矛盾，假设其完备。 + +- L132：把全称成员假设用于 2，得到 2 ∈ [0, 1]。 + +- L133：将这个不可能的具体成员关系简化为 False。 + +- L135：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L136：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L137：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L138：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个算术真命题。 + +- L139：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不满足 ObservationComplete，以及每个自然数满足 n + 0 = n。 + +- L140：用 observation_gap 和对每个自然数给出自反性证明的函数构造合取；Nat 加法把 n + 0 归约为 n。算术证明独立于列表。 + +- L142：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L143：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L144：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L145：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个错误全称等式。 + +- L146：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不完备，以及“每个自然数都等于 0”为假。 + +- L147：把 observation_gap 用作第一个合取项，留下被否定全称命题的证明目标。 + +- L148：假设所有自然数都等于 0，目标为 False。 + +- L149：将假设用于 1，得到 1 = 0。 + +- L150：消去不可能的数值等式。 + +- L152：将 proposedPrinciple n 定义为自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n；名称没有赋予其哲学或规范地位。 + +- L154：将 selfAssessmentSamples 定义为单元素自然数列表 [1]；没有编码评估算法。 + +- L156：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L157：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L158：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L159：开始一个比较固定样本列表与算术全称有效性的定理。 + +- L160：陈述 [1] 中每个元素满足 n + 1 = 2 * n，而非每个自然数都满足它。受限量词展开为 ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n。 + +- L161：将合取拆为样本成立和否定全称成立两个证明目标。 + +- L162：对第一个目标，引入任意自然数 n 及其属于样本列表的假设 hn。 + +- L163：展开单元素列表并简化成员关系，得到 n = 1。 + +- L164：在目标中用 1 替换 n。 + +- L165：展开 proposedPrinciple，得到 1 处的算术等式。 + +- L166：通过可判定计算证明具体等式 1 + 1 = 2 * 1。 + +- L167：对第二个目标，假设该等式在每个自然数处都成立。 + +- L168：将假设用于 0。 + +- L169：展开并简化 0 处的等式，得到矛盾 1 = 0。 + +- L171：关闭 CoreReader 命名空间。 + +### RationaleReader.lean + +路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`。 + +- L1：打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 + +- L3：声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 + +- L4：声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 + +- L5：声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 + +- L6：通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 + +- L8：将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + +- L10：将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + +- L12：将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 + +- L14：将 updateInvalidating 定义为完全忽略旧状态并返回 (n, n)；尽管名称如此，它直接写入两个字段，没有无效标志、逐出、读取或失效协议。 + +- L16：将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 + +- L18：声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 + +- L19：声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 + +- L20：声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 + +- L21：声明 budget，取任意自然数。 + +- L23：将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 + +- L25：将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 + +- L27：开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 + +- L28：使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 + +- L30：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L31：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L32：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L33：陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 + +- L34：将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 + +- L35：通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 + +- L37：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L38：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L39：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L40：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L41：开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 + +- L42：第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 + +- L43：第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 + +- L45：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L46：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L47：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L48：陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 + +- L49：为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 + +- L50：将其用于 11。 + +- L51：展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 + +- L53：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L54：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L55：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L56：开始一个关于 updateInvalidating initial 11 的具体合取定理。 + +- L57：通过计算证明返回状态的两个字段均为 11；这来自构造 (11, 11)，而非已建模的缓存失效过程。 + +- L59：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L60：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L61：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L62：开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 + +- L63：计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 + +- L65：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L66：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L67：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L68：开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 + +- L69：陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 + +- L70：将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 + +- L71：计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 + +- L73：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L74：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L75：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L76：对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 + +- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L81：通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 + +- L83：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L84：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L85：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L86：陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 + +- L87：为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 + +- L88：将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 + +- L89：利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 + +- L90：在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 + +- L92：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + +- L93：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + +- L94：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + +- L95：开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 + +- L96：同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 + +- L97：复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 + +- L99：关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dcc68e1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `bd4eb98a1b1369a610195329d9f33f2162c693aa31def3b28ec03d37874a0e17`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Informed code update: Round 2 (English) + +## Status and input boundary + +This is an informed incremental code explanation, not a fresh blind assessment. The original English explanation and line JSON were frozen before this update, and the original Chinese explanation and line JSON were completed without reading revised code. The initiating agent then disclosed the changed declaration locations and requested this update. That message mentioned a new stored-principle/sample computation and revised state-list comparison; it supplied no source prose or source correspondence judgment. The translator has now inspected the revised encoding, while still not reading PHILOSOPHY, rationale source prose, source snapshots, run.json, source-first judgments, author mapping interpretations, or prior records. Original blind artifacts remain unchanged. Source fidelity remains unevaluated. + +Current input hashes: + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803` + +- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7` + +## CoreReader: an actual finite Boolean assessment + +At lines 154–162, SelfAssessingSystem stores ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool and samples : List Nat. runOwnAssessment applies List.all to the samples with the function from that same record. This gives an explicit identity link: the function assessed on the finite samples is the very field later quantified over in the theorem. List.all evaluates to true on [] and evaluates p head && all tail p on a nonempty list. It therefore checks all listed inputs, without checking any unlisted input. The fields impose no sample-selection, nonemptiness, coverage, or correctness invariant. The word own is a field name; the code establishes that the function is stored in this record, but has no provenance or ownership relation. + +sampleSystem stores the Boolean function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n and the sample list [1]. The old proposedPrinciple definition at line 152 remains, but the function literally repeats its arithmetic expression rather than referring to that definition. The sample function is computational, using the inferred Decidable instance for natural-number equality. This library instance supplies an equality decision procedure, not an extra domain premise supplied by a caller. + +At lines 167–174, self_assessment_not_correctness proves runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true and ¬ (∀ n : Nat, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true). The first part unfolds the actual computation and decides the equation at 1. The second assumes true at every input, instantiates at 0, and simplifies the false arithmetic equation to the impossible Boolean equality false = true. Thus this one system passes its actual finite sample check while its own stored function fails at an untested input. This now includes an assessment computation that the initial encoding lacked. It remains a numerical example of finite testing; it does not encode assessment of an evaluator, recursive philosophical self-application, correctness of a philosophy, or fulfillment of an external responsibility. Passing the supplied finite test does not become a premise proving all-input validity. + +Exact revised encoding: + +`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–174) + +```lean + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +structure SelfAssessingSystem where + ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool + samples : List Nat + +def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := + s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple + +def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := + ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad + +``` + +## RationaleReader: retaining one input while adding a revealing input + +The initial updateInvalidating definition and invalidation_restores_fixture theorem have been removed. Their old explanation describes only the frozen initial input; no current theorem models direct writes to both fields as a repair. + +At lines 91–96, originalStates is [initial] and revisedStates is [initial, updateOnly initial 11]. These are explicit lists of pure records: initial has (acknowledged, cached) = (10, 10), and the additional record has (11, 10). The original record is retained as the identical first list element. compareReads maps each input to the pair (direct state, cachedRead state); List.map preserves order and length. Despite its name, the function collects observations into pairs and does not itself test the two values for equality or produce an equivalence verdict. + +At lines 101–103, revised_method_retains_case proves the exact output lists [(10, 10)] and [(10, 10), (11, 10)] by decidable computation. This demonstrates for these two fixed input lists that expanding the selected cases retains the earlier equal pair and adds a differing pair. It does not repair the state transformation, establish cache freshness, prove a universal theorem about all method revisions, or model all possible update/read interleavings. The output lists provide concrete observable artifacts; they are not execution histories with timing or independent support for the chosen domain interpretation. + +Exact revised encoding: + +`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:91` (lines 91–103) + +```lean + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +``` + +## Retained claims and limits + +Unchanged declarations retain the code-derived meanings in the initial manuscript. In particular, Assessed still ignores labels; Duties still depends on arbitrary predicates; the token consequence relation is still finite and explicitly stipulated; ChangeReported is still only a Boolean condition on list inequality; the observation-gap conjunctions still have no evidence-support relation; and namedUniversalTruth still returns the supplied proof h unchanged. The new assessment computation and new state-list output theorem do not alter those independent limitations. Line numbers in the initial manuscript belong to the frozen initial inputs; use line-explanations-current.json for current locations. + +## Actual checks and dependencies + +Both revised files were copied verbatim into *.current.audit.lean with only #print axioms commands appended for every top-level declared definition, type, structure, and theorem, then elaborated and kernel-checked with installed Lean 4.33.1. Both commands exited 0. The declaration-by-declaration logs are CoreReader.current.audit.log and RationaleReader.current.audit.log. The same retained set of theorem names reported propext as in the initial audit; self_assessment_not_correctness still uses propext. The added SelfAssessingSystem, runOwnAssessment, sampleSystem, originalStates, revisedStates, compareReads, and revised_method_retains_case reported no axioms. No user axiom or sorry was introduced. The checked List.all body and Decidable.decide definition are recorded in core-library-inspection.log. Decidable.decide returns false for an isFalse decision and true for an isTrue decision; its Decidable argument is a core-inferred typeclass instance here. + +The full current nonblank-line explanation is line-explanations-current.json, with both en and zh for every line, including comments, fields, definitions, proof steps, and namespace delimiters. Unchanged entries were reused only through exact aligned code lines, while the changed Core block and all newly added Rationale lines were explained afresh. This is an explanation and formal dependency check, not independent validation of source meaning or philosophical correctness. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..82388be --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json @@ -0,0 +1,2630 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", + "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "initial_records": [ + { + "role": "source_initial", + "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", + "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" + }, + { + "role": "code_blind", + "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", + "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" + }, + { + "role": "code_informed_update", + "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", + "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison", + "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", + "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" + } + ], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", + "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", + "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", + "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", + "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", + "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", + "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", + "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + } + ], + "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..82388be --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json @@ -0,0 +1,2630 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", + "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", + "code_sha256": { + "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" + }, + "initial_records": [ + { + "role": "source_initial", + "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", + "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" + }, + { + "role": "code_blind", + "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", + "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" + }, + { + "role": "code_informed_update", + "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", + "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" + }, + { + "role": "source_comparison", + "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", + "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" + } + ], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", + "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", + "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", + "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", + "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", + "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", + "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", + "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", + "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", + "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", + "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "fidelity": "pending", + "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", + "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", + "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" + } + ], + "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..fab352a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `cb99ad55a0e4dad0f45f74ef91d279313333a2571a48e0d3856670ad2734272b`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 第二轮：两个修订对应的独立复评 + +日期：2026-09-13。仅复评c-83-c2和r-121-c4；旧初评、第一轮比较及其四项拒绝判断全部保留，不改写历史。本轮两个新版本均判断partial，详见mapped-judgments-round2.json中的逐条双语理由。c-89-c2和c-94-c3没有修正相关语义，继续rejected。 + +## 新证据与判断变化 + +c-83-c2：SelfAssessingSystem现在实际持有ownPrinciple和samples，runOwnAssessment确实计算同一所属谓词在自身样本上的结果。sampleSystem的[1]通过而0反驳其普遍正确，原先“只有名称、没有对象所属关系与实际考察”的缺口已在这个狭窄解释中补足。因此由rejected改为partial。仍没有形成/修订、适用条件、对评估规则本身的评估或全部反身性；不能从这个实例宣称任何自评都失败或自评永远不能支持正确结论。 + +r-121-c4：删除updateInvalidating实现修复示例，新增originalStates/revisedStates和实际compareReads。direct与cachedRead不变，修订的是比较状态集合，结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)，与本句的评估范围修订有直接有限对应。因此由rejected改为partial。它只是一个静态案例与一个变化案例，未建模一般测试运行器、任意序列、并发或所有回归案例。 + +## 自选实际边界变体 + +所有源码快照、探针、完整重跑命令、首次失败和实际输出保存在reader-round2-probes/。不是仅列计划或手动推断。 + +1. Core：把samples改为空列表，runOwnAssessment返回true，但所属谓词仍在0处为假；把samples改为[1,0]返回false；另建恒真所属谓词，测试返回true且能证明全部输入正确。四个实际输出为(true,true,false,true)，顺序为空样本、原实例、含反例样本、恒真原则。通过可以空泛，也可以与错误或正确并存，是否有实质支持仍需要解释采样和主张范围。 +2. Rationale：compareReads在空状态列表输出[]，仅initial输出[(10,10)]，加入updateOnly initial 10仍只有相同对，真实revisedStates输出[(10,10),(11,10)]。另实际证明initial属于revisedStates。评估修订的可见贡献依赖加入相关变化，不由列表更长或“revised”名称保证。 + +这些边界不要求扩大公布模型。它们要求公布措辞保留“选定非空实例”“加入11这一相关变化”“有限反例/有限比较”，不把样本通过说成完整自评能力，也不把任意新增案例说成改进。 + +## 实际运行与限制 + +首次尝试在两个工程执行lake env lean并导入模块，均因工程搜索路径无对应olean返回1；Lake同时自动创建了此前不存在的lake-manifest.json。未假装首次运行通过。随后将所读完整源码快照与探针体拼接成两个独立Lean文件，使用固定Lean4.33.1二进制检查，均返回0并输出上述结果。这同时检查了源声明与新探针，无需依赖一个未知的新旧构建产物。实际结果含恢复过程和快照hash。 + +本轮未修改维护源码、run.json、原初评或第一轮判断。除Lake自动生成manifest外，新增文件仅在忽略的P下。无需重复已通过探针；后续若文稿宣称超出上述范围，应作为新的具体措辞/对应问题审查。没有full判断或哲学正确性认证。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..19ae64a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,34 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `37695a48276f635e264f19ccc07bef559600946518835eef37029ab18c7b3a1d`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# 原文初评与已披露编码比较 + +日期：2026-09-13。比较者：reader_source_initial。本轮是在source-initial.md和source-inventory.json冻结后进行的知情比较；不修改两份初评文件。基线仍为Core 0.1.3英文正本及当前rationale。已读取两个run.json、两个完整Lean源文件、encoding-preregistration.md，以及两份entry-data的全部映射条目。输入hash单独保存在comparison-input-hashes.json。 + +## 判断 + +16个已映射源子句中，12项支持有限对应（partial），4项拒绝当前对应（rejected）。另记录15项实质未编码内容为pending，108项结构或表格角色/名称为not_applicable。无full判断。mapped-judgments.json提供逐项英文及中文理由，id使用clause_id；clause=null则使用entry_id。未列出的实质主张应由汇总者明确标为pending并说明没有编码，不能因为条目缺席视为通过。 + +构建与依赖审计通过是调用者披露的机械结果；本轮未重复构建。所有保真判断来自实际定义、完整定理陈述与源文对应，不来自build状态。没有把未建模判为哲学缺陷。 + +## 四项当前对应应撤回或修订 + +1. c-89-c2：ObservationComplete只表示列表覆盖全部自然数，不含观测结果、主张、根据和支持关系。因此observation_gap及真假结论并列定理均不能表示“根据支持与主张强度/范围相称”。尤其真结论n+0=n已有独立证明，不能因列表未覆盖全部自然数称它支持不足；反过来只有输入覆盖也不保证观测内容为真或相关。预注册的“coverage sufficiency criterion”并未以证据与结论的关系实现，而且若被视为一般充分支持会改变原义。最小修正是撤回这四项对c-89-c2的映射，保留未映射的算术/覆盖示例；若要重新映射，需要明确的仅凭观测记录的蕴涵模型及额外假设，不能以名称补足。 +2. c-94-c3：unrelated_grounds_rejected仅因bothExamined要求grounds=3而拒绝4，证明的是记录编号不匹配。它没有实现“考察那些根据是否支持相应主张”。允许examined作为外部关系的条件化接口，不等于具体编号等式已经有考察语义。应撤回对这句实质考察责任的映射，保留编号完整性探针。c-94-c5/c6可保留为条件化责任分配和分类标签无免责效力的有限接口。 +3. c-83-c2：self_assessment_not_correctness是样本1通过、输入0失败的局部测试反例。没有系统、它的评估原则或将同一评估原则用于自身的行为；selfAssessmentSamples只是名称。应撤回当前自评对应，或建立有解释依据的自评对象与行为实例。这个算术结果可有限说明局部通过不能保证普遍正确，但后者不等同于原文的反身对象关系。 +4. r-121-c4：invalidation_restores_fixture修改了实现，令acknowledged与cached同步；原文此句说修订评估方法，比较两个候选的update–read序列并保留静态案例。不能把修复实现当成修订评估方法。最小修正是将映射改为实际update_read_counterexample加original_comparison/unchanged_update_retained，并仍标partial；正向失效更新实例可保留为额外候选示例，不能凭它证明测试集合保留或评估流程已形式化。 + +## 有限成立之处及保留界限 + +- 实际类型叫Aspect，具有empirical/inferential/value三个构造子，源码没有Kind声明。这是应用预设分类而非完整认识论分类的证明。Duties保留同一claim/grounds对及每个实际适用面的责任；mixed_projection只是由已假设的Duties投影，不构成外部责任已履行的证据。bothExamined及empiricalOnly是编号/标签记录，未实现经验考察的不确定性、推论支持关系或价值批评责任。标签遗漏反例能说明该接口的责任不随labels变化，不能证明真实适用分类已穷尽。 +- Consistent的整个held列表可产生联合后果，p/pImpliesQ/notQ确实触发一个context的正反结论；撤回及不同context示例提供有限对应。context把问题/假设/含义/范围折叠，推论关系是一个预设实例而非通用逻辑系统。ChangeReported只在实质撤回实例中对应明确；一般List不等会把重排或重复也视为变化，不能泛称语义变化判定器。 +- R1：namedUniversalTruth明确为h:P推出P，不是无条件普遍真理。0≤1与被2反驳的∀n,n≤1构成条件/量词改变的具体反例，支持“证明这个陈述不能自动建立另一个陈述”的有限说明。different_statement_refuted确实断言这个选定更强命题为假；这可以是具体见证，但中文英文解释均须避免提升为“凡对应失败，散文主张必假”。未编码一般证明可靠性、任意编码对应或哲学承诺的真假。r-77-c1与c4仍未映射。 +- 软件初态10/10、预算6下时延5/2均合格；updateOnly改为11后缓存仍10，直接读取11。它们实现源案例的一个明确反例，未建模真实时延、并发或全部故障。budget3是另一情境，预算定理仅覆盖r-119-c2合取义务的时延部分，新鲜度责任仍未表达。 +- 当前rationale.L120（r-120-c2至c6）没有任何声明映射，旧method-stage对应已撤回；这是正确保留缺口。此处的Grounds/Consistency/Reflexivity/可审查性推论不能由算术状态定理替代。r-119-c1与r-120-c1等“Additional premises”“Inference”只是表格角色，已标not_applicable。 + +## 范围与自检 + +本轮对所有16个已映射子句逐项检查了实际声明；未宣称全部未映射子句已做同等深度编码评审。结构、表格角色名称与实质论断分开，源文仍完整保留。模型失败不改写原文；既有初评与hash不变。判断标准没有因作者声明“checked”或“limited”而降低，partial也不意味着完整子句已被证明。有限接口可作为可读实例；错误的直接对应应修正而不是仅靠总体免责声明稀释。 + +没有必要递归委派或重跑相同构建。后续仅需比较有实质变化的映射/编码和文稿陈述，并分别保留原判与新判。未执行维护文件修改或哲学采用。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..90b1632 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +# Public review record + +This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `5a292830b2fdb6e0670049bf56bbb278416fd2418272e4d586bd8f0f904386b8`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. + +# Independent source-only initial assessment — frozen + +Date: 2026-09-13. Reviewer: reader_source_initial. This record precedes disclosure of any current candidate encoding, author verdict, or expected comparison result. Selected baseline: `OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md` philosophy/core 0.1.3, English authority. Companion: `OrganonCore/docs/rationale.md`, non-normative. Goal supplied by caller: faithful limited Lean formalization and two-granularity English/Chinese explanations covering the 22 Core text units and the complete rationale. No candidate has been assessed here, and this is not an adoption judgment. + +## Provenance and limits of independence + +Read the supplied Core AGENTS, PHILOSOPHY and rationale in full; RTK instructions; assess, principled-review, wording-review, shared iteration and philosophy-resolution instructions; translation guidance. No candidate code, author rationale, prior detailed review, blind translation, or archive package was opened. AGENTS instructed starting local records from ACTIVE.md; reading that index incidentally exposed one-line historical task summaries, including an earlier description of Assessment as an accepted conditional normative interface. Those summaries are not source evidence and are not used to determine this judgment. This limited exposure prevents claiming complete ignorance of historical verdict metadata. Exact source clauses, not that summary, ground the distinctions below. No recursive delegation occurred. + +## Initial judgment and expected fidelity boundaries + +The source supports a limited formal interpretation of selected responsibility and support relations, if the interpretation explicitly preserves normative force, applicability, and the distinction between supporting a claim and examining its support. It does not supply a complete formal ontology, inference calculus, support metric, or source-to-model correspondence proof. The success of a Lean check could establish an encoded statement under its assumptions; its relevance to the prose remains a separate judgment. Unknown correspondence is not a pass, a core conflict, or proof that the source is defective. + +1. Core preamble: adopted commitments, meanings, and application limits constitute the authority; they are not descriptive laws of every system. Charter and Grounds mutually constrain each other without priority or deductive hierarchy. Rationale and contextual skill requirements must retain their separate status. +2. Self-Transcendence: expansion is valued, not merely allowed. Organization, methods and principles remain revisable. Orientation, permission, actual change and supported achievement are different. Universal nonfinality within the relevant existing forms does not impose change on every action, guarantee progress, exclude justified stability, or demand independence from external help. +3. Internal Consistency: preserve simultaneous holding and implications, same question, assumptions, meanings and scope. Changing or withdrawing a judgment may remove co-holding; concealed redefinition cannot erase a prior contradiction. Tension is not yet contradiction. Compatibility cannot stand for correctness, adequacy or inferential entailment. +4. Reflexivity: both system and formation/application/revision of principles are assessment and generation objects, subject to their applicable conditions. No self exemption when conditions hold, no unconditional application of every principle to itself. Self-application and internally produced revision do not establish correctness or sufficient grounds. +5. Grounds and Assessment: articulability identifies concepts, assumptions, reasons and limits. Assessment examines whether those grounds support the corresponding claim; completing it may establish insufficient support. It must not be encoded as an obligation to obtain a successful support verdict, nor as a completed marker lacking claim/grounds/conditions correspondence. Each applicable mixed aspect retains its responsibility even without a classification tag. Empirical assessment examines evidence/performance plus support conditions, scope and uncertainty; inferential assessment examines assumptions and inferential relations; value assessment states position, reasons, limits and consequences and stays open to relevant criticism. An initial value commitment need not prove every starting assumption. The general proportionate-support constraint limits claims; it does not guarantee all assessed claims are supported. +6. Scope and tools: local agreement cannot establish unconditional universals or absence of omitted differences. Measurement, repetition and frameworks can be useful but form no universally mandatory chain. A verifiable unreproduced observation may offer limited support; stochastic output identity and stability of conclusions are different. +7. Capability claims: application-specific definitions and conditions determine the actual claim. External evidence may support a capability without internal explanation; reliable output does not automatically establish understanding. An application may explicitly require explanation. Counts alone do not establish expansion. Narrowing a definition creates a new claim and cannot retroactively prove the old one. +8. Choice commitment: relevant reasons connect priority to objectives, values and constraints. Name, convention or status alone are insufficient; tradition may embody an explicitly adopted value with a relevant connection. This additional commitment is not derived merely from grouping it under Grounds. Openness does not imply equivalence, multiple feasible means, mandatory novelty, or rejection of established methods. Internal method properties may matter. +9. Relationships and terms: retain all foregoing distinctions under mutual application; no self-proof follows. “Assessment” includes reasons, applicability and observed performance and is not limited to executable tests. Read that list with the type-appropriate assessment responsibilities rather than silently making empirical outcome evidence mandatory for every claim type. +10. Rationale: preserve arguments’ premises, objections and limits, historical placement assertions as assertions of this text, and all illustrative cases. Removal checks concern loss of an explicit contribution, expressly not formal independence. Hypothetical research/software examples add contextual values and constraints; potential contributions and bounded support are not actual proof of domain-wide improvement. Repository tools, English authority, independent-first review and records are contextual arrangements rather than philosophical theorems. +11. Formal-proof example (rationale line 77): the hypothesis includes a checked proof whose encoding changes the claim’s conditions or claim-to-grounds relation. Its encoded statement is established relative to assumptions and proof dependencies, but this does not thereby establish the different prose claim. Correspondence failure is initially a modeling finding, not itself a reason to revise the commitment. A formalization must keep checked derivation, source interpretation and support relevance separately reviewable. Non-entailment must not be replaced by falsity of the prose conclusion. + +## Questions not fixed by the source + +- “Intrinsic orientation when expansion is regarded as worth pursuing” supplies an intended meaning but no measurable criterion or complete equivalence schema. A model’s precise predicate/definition is an interpretation to disclose. +- Contradiction, relevant implications, and the admissible inference calculus are not algorithmically fixed. Selecting classical proposition logic, a finite claim domain, or a closure rule adds modeling choices. +- Proportionate support has no universal numerical or ordered scale in the text. Claim/grounds correspondence and sufficient support require interpreted relations and contextual evidence; their names alone cannot establish them. +- Applicable aspects are not supplied as an exhaustive classification algorithm. A finite aspect datatype can be a bounded application interface only if its coverage limits and unclassified cases are explicit. +- The Assessment terminology row does not define a formal selector for when observed-performance examination applies. Its claim-appropriate context rules out silently making empirical evidence a universal prerequisite; an exact selector remains an additional interpretation. +- The proof example contains no concrete model or correspondence test; it cannot determine an unseen candidate’s fidelity. The software example does not fully specify concurrency semantics or all workloads; the research example supplies no actual study results. These are bounded examples, not omissions to fill as source commitments. +- The rationale’s external simplicity-source attribution has been preserved but not independently fact-checked in this source-only task. No judgment about the external article’s accuracy is offered. + +These are interpretation and support boundaries, not established contradictions in the philosophy. None authorizes changing the adopted commitments. + +## Coverage and bounded self-check + +`source-inventory.json` preserves exact text and line numbers for every nonempty source line, including every paragraph, table row, heading, ID and metadata line. Each substantive entry has a source-specific initial reading of force, conditions, intended contribution and unresolved questions, plus first-pass clause splits and force/scope markers. Splitting is not a formal parse; nested semantic clauses can remain. Structural rows carry no independent philosophical obligations. The Core has exactly 22 stable IDs: 20 directly contain substantive text and two (`organon.charter`, `organon.relationships`) are structural groupings. They must not be populated with invented commitments merely to match a count. + +Actual checks: the inventory contains 202 exact nonempty lines (Core 99; rationale 103), with 119 substantive paragraph/table entries. These are documentary coverage checks, not whole-text semantic-completeness certification. No model, proof, bilingual candidate or actual reader outcome was inspected. No claim is made about universal adequacy, formal independence, minimality, or philosophical truth. + +Bounded review of this record: consistency checked by keeping responsibilities separate from successful outcomes and current commitments separate from contextual methods; completeness is limited to the supplied source and first-pass clause readings; external adequacy of hypothetical cases cannot be inferred without actual evidence; a concrete correspondence counterexample can revise a later candidate judgment; a static inventory need not display a system’s generative orientation; no comparative parsimony advantage is claimed without a comparable alternative. An initial inventory is useful as a traceable baseline, not sufficient as fidelity evidence. Stop here until candidate disclosure supplies new evidence. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..582c09a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md @@ -0,0 +1,31 @@ +# Reported source fidelity + +These are reported semantic judgments, not kernel conclusions. Initial records precede comparison; revised mappings have informed follow-up judgments. Two rejected attempts have editorial current-result wording; their original independent reasons and verdicts remain in the initial comparison export. The bound records and exact object hashes are listed in fidelity.json. Unmodeled entries remain pending; structure is not a philosophical theorem. + +## r-77-c2 — partial + +namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. + +## r-77-c3 — partial + +The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. + +## r-119-c2 — partial + +budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. + +## r-119-c5 — partial + +original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. + +## r-121-c2 — partial + +The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. + +## r-121-c3 — partial + +A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. + +## r-121-c4 — partial + +compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8e0b2c1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json @@ -0,0 +1,4119 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "source": { + "kind": "text", + "path": "snapshots/source.md", + "snapshot": "snapshots/source.md", + "sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", + "spans": [ + { + "id": "rationale.L1", + "start_line": 1, + "end_line": 1 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L2", + "start_line": 2, + "end_line": 2 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L3", + "start_line": 3, + "end_line": 3 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L4", + "start_line": 4, + "end_line": 4 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L5", + "start_line": 5, + "end_line": 5 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L6", + "start_line": 6, + "end_line": 6 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L7", + "start_line": 7, + "end_line": 7 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L8", + "start_line": 8, + "end_line": 8 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L9", + "start_line": 9, + "end_line": 9 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L10", + "start_line": 10, + "end_line": 10 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L11", + "start_line": 11, + "end_line": 11 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L12", + "start_line": 12, + "end_line": 12 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L13", + "start_line": 13, + "end_line": 13 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L14", + "start_line": 14, + "end_line": 14 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L15", + "start_line": 15, + "end_line": 15 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L16", + "start_line": 16, + "end_line": 16 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L17", + "start_line": 17, + "end_line": 17 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L18", + "start_line": 18, + "end_line": 18 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L19", + "start_line": 19, + "end_line": 19 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L20", + "start_line": 20, + "end_line": 20 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L21", + "start_line": 21, + "end_line": 21 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L22", + "start_line": 22, + "end_line": 22 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L23", + "start_line": 23, + "end_line": 23 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L24", + "start_line": 24, + "end_line": 24 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L25", + "start_line": 25, + "end_line": 25 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L26", + "start_line": 26, + "end_line": 26 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L27", + "start_line": 27, + "end_line": 27 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L28", + "start_line": 28, + "end_line": 28 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L29", + "start_line": 29, + "end_line": 29 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L30", + "start_line": 30, + "end_line": 30 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L31", + "start_line": 31, + "end_line": 31 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L32", + "start_line": 32, + "end_line": 32 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L33", + "start_line": 33, + "end_line": 33 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L34", + "start_line": 34, + "end_line": 34 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L35", + "start_line": 35, + "end_line": 35 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L36", + "start_line": 36, + "end_line": 36 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L37", + "start_line": 37, + "end_line": 37 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L38", + "start_line": 38, + "end_line": 38 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L39", + "start_line": 39, + "end_line": 39 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L40", + "start_line": 40, + "end_line": 40 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L41", + "start_line": 41, + "end_line": 41 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L42", + "start_line": 42, + "end_line": 42 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L43", + "start_line": 43, + "end_line": 43 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L44", + "start_line": 44, + "end_line": 44 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L45", + "start_line": 45, + "end_line": 45 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L46", + "start_line": 46, + "end_line": 46 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L47", + "start_line": 47, + "end_line": 47 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L48", + "start_line": 48, + "end_line": 48 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L49", + "start_line": 49, + "end_line": 49 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L50", + "start_line": 50, + "end_line": 50 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L51", + "start_line": 51, + "end_line": 51 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L52", + "start_line": 52, + "end_line": 52 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L53", + "start_line": 53, + "end_line": 53 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L54", + "start_line": 54, + "end_line": 54 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L55", + "start_line": 55, + "end_line": 55 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L56", + "start_line": 56, + "end_line": 56 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L57", + "start_line": 57, + "end_line": 57 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L58", + "start_line": 58, + "end_line": 58 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L59", + "start_line": 59, + "end_line": 59 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L60", + "start_line": 60, + "end_line": 60 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L61", + "start_line": 61, + "end_line": 61 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L62", + "start_line": 62, + "end_line": 62 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L63", + "start_line": 63, + "end_line": 63 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L64", + "start_line": 64, + "end_line": 64 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L65", + "start_line": 65, + "end_line": 65 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L66", + "start_line": 66, + "end_line": 66 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L67", + "start_line": 67, + "end_line": 67 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L68", + "start_line": 68, + "end_line": 68 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L69", + "start_line": 69, + "end_line": 69 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L70", + "start_line": 70, + "end_line": 70 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L71", + "start_line": 71, + "end_line": 71 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L72", + "start_line": 72, + "end_line": 72 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L73", + "start_line": 73, + "end_line": 73 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L74", + "start_line": 74, + "end_line": 74 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L75", + "start_line": 75, + "end_line": 75 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L76", + "start_line": 76, + "end_line": 76 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L77", + "start_line": 77, + "end_line": 77 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L78", + "start_line": 78, + "end_line": 78 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L79", + "start_line": 79, + "end_line": 79 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L80", + "start_line": 80, + "end_line": 80 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L81", + "start_line": 81, + "end_line": 81 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L82", + "start_line": 82, + "end_line": 82 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L83", + "start_line": 83, + "end_line": 83 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L84", + "start_line": 84, + "end_line": 84 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L85", + "start_line": 85, + "end_line": 85 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L86", + "start_line": 86, + "end_line": 86 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L87", + "start_line": 87, + "end_line": 87 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L88", + "start_line": 88, + "end_line": 88 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L89", + "start_line": 89, + "end_line": 89 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L90", + "start_line": 90, + "end_line": 90 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L91", + "start_line": 91, + "end_line": 91 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L92", + "start_line": 92, + "end_line": 92 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L93", + "start_line": 93, + "end_line": 93 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L94", + "start_line": 94, + "end_line": 94 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L95", + "start_line": 95, + "end_line": 95 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L96", + "start_line": 96, + "end_line": 96 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L97", + "start_line": 97, + "end_line": 97 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L98", + "start_line": 98, + "end_line": 98 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L99", + "start_line": 99, + "end_line": 99 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L100", + "start_line": 100, + "end_line": 100 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L101", + "start_line": 101, + "end_line": 101 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L102", + "start_line": 102, + "end_line": 102 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L103", + "start_line": 103, + "end_line": 103 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L104", + "start_line": 104, + "end_line": 104 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L105", + "start_line": 105, + "end_line": 105 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L106", + "start_line": 106, + "end_line": 106 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L107", + "start_line": 107, + "end_line": 107 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L108", + "start_line": 108, + "end_line": 108 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L109", + "start_line": 109, + "end_line": 109 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L110", + "start_line": 110, + "end_line": 110 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L111", + "start_line": 111, + "end_line": 111 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L112", + "start_line": 112, + "end_line": 112 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L113", + "start_line": 113, + "end_line": 113 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L114", + "start_line": 114, + "end_line": 114 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L115", + "start_line": 115, + "end_line": 115 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L116", + "start_line": 116, + "end_line": 116 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L117", + "start_line": 117, + "end_line": 117 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L118", + "start_line": 118, + "end_line": 118 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L119", + "start_line": 119, + "end_line": 119 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L120", + "start_line": 120, + "end_line": 120 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L121", + "start_line": 121, + "end_line": 121 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L122", + "start_line": 122, + "end_line": 122 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L123", + "start_line": 123, + "end_line": 123 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L124", + "start_line": 124, + "end_line": 124 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L125", + "start_line": 125, + "end_line": 125 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L126", + "start_line": 126, + "end_line": 126 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L127", + "start_line": 127, + "end_line": 127 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L128", + "start_line": 128, + "end_line": 128 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L129", + "start_line": 129, + "end_line": 129 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L130", + "start_line": 130, + "end_line": 130 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L131", + "start_line": 131, + "end_line": 131 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L132", + "start_line": 132, + "end_line": 132 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L133", + "start_line": 133, + "end_line": 133 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L134", + "start_line": 134, + "end_line": 134 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L135", + "start_line": 135, + "end_line": 135 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L136", + "start_line": 136, + "end_line": 136 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L137", + "start_line": 137, + "end_line": 137 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L138", + "start_line": 138, + "end_line": 138 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L139", + "start_line": 139, + "end_line": 139 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L140", + "start_line": 140, + "end_line": 140 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L141", + "start_line": 141, + "end_line": 141 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L142", + "start_line": 142, + "end_line": 142 + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L143", + "start_line": 143, + "end_line": 143 + } + ] + }, + "baseline": { + "path": "snapshots/philosophy.md", + "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" + }, + "project": { + "path": "leanified", + "root_module": "RationaleReader" + }, + "preregistration": { + "path": "PREREGISTERED.md", + "sha256": "566dbb98e64acce0e25f454c5a890a4280eff60d3684b5f54b1164933804c263" + }, + "units": [ + { + "id": "rationale.L1", + "hash": "668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L2", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L3", + "hash": "ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "claim": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "claim": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L4", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L5", + "hash": "933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "claim": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "claim": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "claim": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L6", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L7", + "hash": "1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L8", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L9", + "hash": "a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L10", + "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L11", + "hash": "d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "claim": "Generative Drive", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "claim": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "claim": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "claim": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L12", + "hash": "fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "claim": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "claim": "Charter, unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "claim": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L13", + "hash": "64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "claim": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "claim": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "claim": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "claim": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L14", + "hash": "6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "claim": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "claim": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "claim": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "claim": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "claim": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L15", + "hash": "33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "claim": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "claim": "The provision and its conditions remain.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "claim": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L16", + "hash": "a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "claim": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "claim": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "claim": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "claim": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L17", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L18", + "hash": "0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L19", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L20", + "hash": "10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L21", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L22", + "hash": "f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "claim": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "claim": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L23", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L24", + "hash": "4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L25", + "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L26", + "hash": "4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "claim": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "claim": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "claim": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "claim": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "claim": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L27", + "hash": "7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "claim": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "claim": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "claim": "This supports examining their compatibility.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "claim": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "claim": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "claim": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L28", + "hash": "104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "claim": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "claim": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "claim": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "claim": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "claim": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L29", + "hash": "9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "claim": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "claim": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "claim": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "claim": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "claim": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "claim": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L30", + "hash": "60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "claim": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "claim": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "claim": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "claim": "They are not disallowed;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "claim": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "claim": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L31", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L32", + "hash": "7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "claim": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "claim": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "claim": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L33", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L34", + "hash": "4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L35", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L36", + "hash": "caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "claim": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "claim": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "claim": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L37", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L38", + "hash": "3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "claim": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "claim": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "claim": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "claim": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "claim": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L39", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L40", + "hash": "b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "claim": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "claim": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "claim": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "claim": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "claim": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L41", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L42", + "hash": "54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L43", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L44", + "hash": "8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "claim": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "claim": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "claim": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "claim": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L45", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L46", + "hash": "0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L47", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L48", + "hash": "956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "claim": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "claim": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "claim": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "claim": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "claim": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "claim": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "claim": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "claim": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L49", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L50", + "hash": "4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "claim": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "claim": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "claim": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "claim": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "claim": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L51", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L52", + "hash": "219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L53", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L54", + "hash": "d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L55", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L56", + "hash": "90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "claim": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "claim": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L57", + "hash": "d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "claim": "Internal Consistency", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "claim": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "claim": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "claim": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L58", + "hash": "b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "claim": "Reflexivity", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "claim": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "claim": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L59", + "hash": "34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "claim": "Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "claim": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L60", + "hash": "66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "claim": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L61", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L62", + "hash": "c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "claim": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "claim": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "claim": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L63", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L64", + "hash": "97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L65", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L66", + "hash": "959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "claim": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "claim": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "claim": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L67", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L68", + "hash": "08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L69", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L70", + "hash": "d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "claim": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "claim": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "claim": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L71", + "hash": "9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "claim": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "claim": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "claim": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L72", + "hash": "02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "claim": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "claim": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L73", + "hash": "e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "claim": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "claim": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "claim": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L74", + "hash": "330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "claim": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "claim": "This violates internal consistency.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "claim": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L75", + "hash": "34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "claim": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "claim": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L76", + "hash": "1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "claim": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "claim": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "claim": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L77", + "hash": "10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "claim": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "claim": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "claim": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "claim": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L78", + "hash": "6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "claim": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "claim": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "claim": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L79", + "hash": "e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "claim": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "claim": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "claim": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "claim": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L80", + "hash": "cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "claim": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "claim": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "claim": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L81", + "hash": "06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "claim": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "claim": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "claim": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "claim": "These capability definitions come from the application.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L82", + "hash": "bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "claim": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "claim": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "claim": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "claim": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L83", + "hash": "3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "claim": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "claim": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "claim": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "claim": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L84", + "hash": "252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "claim": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "claim": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L85", + "hash": "25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "claim": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "claim": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "claim": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L86", + "hash": "a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "claim": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "claim": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "claim": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L87", + "hash": "2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "claim": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "claim": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L88", + "hash": "b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "claim": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "claim": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "claim": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L89", + "hash": "9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "claim": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "claim": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "claim": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "claim": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L90", + "hash": "b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "claim": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "claim": "Renaming alone adds no support.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "claim": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L91", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L92", + "hash": "bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L93", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L94", + "hash": "8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "claim": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "claim": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "claim": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "claim": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L95", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L96", + "hash": "30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "claim": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "claim": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "claim": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "claim": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L97", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L98", + "hash": "310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "claim": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "claim": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "claim": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L99", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L100", + "hash": "e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L101", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L102", + "hash": "23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "claim": "The following are hypothetical applications.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "claim": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "claim": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L103", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L104", + "hash": "e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L105", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L106", + "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L107", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L108", + "hash": "b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "claim": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "claim": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L109", + "hash": "51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "claim": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "claim": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "claim": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "claim": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "claim": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L110", + "hash": "bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "claim": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "claim": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "claim": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "claim": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "claim": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L111", + "hash": "b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "claim": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "claim": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "claim": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "claim": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "claim": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "claim": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L112", + "hash": "2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "claim": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "claim": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "claim": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "claim": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "claim": "the number of labels alone cannot.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "claim": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "claim": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "claim": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L113", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L114", + "hash": "ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L115", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L116", + "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L117", + "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L118", + "hash": "7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "claim": "Claim", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "claim": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L119", + "hash": "2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "claim": "Additional premises", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "claim": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "claim": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "claim": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "claim": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "claim": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "claim": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L120", + "hash": "4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "claim": "Inference", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "claim": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "claim": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "claim": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "claim": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L121", + "hash": "572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "claim": "Counterexample", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "claim": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "claim": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "claim": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", + "declarations": [ + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ] + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "claim": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L122", + "hash": "b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "claim": "Conclusion", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "claim": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "claim": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "claim": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "claim": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L123", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L124", + "hash": "a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "claim": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "claim": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "claim": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L125", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L126", + "hash": "e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L127", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L128", + "hash": "138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "claim": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "claim": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L129", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L130", + "hash": "9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L131", + "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L132", + "hash": "d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "claim": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "claim": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "claim": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "claim": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "claim": "Another project could select a different language.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L133", + "hash": "162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "claim": "A text-centered core and script-free skills", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "claim": "The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "claim": "Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "claim": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "claim": "Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "claim": "their absence here is a design choice.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L134", + "hash": "4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "claim": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "claim": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "claim": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "claim": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "claim": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L135", + "hash": "7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "claim": "`organon-core-principled-review`", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "claim": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "claim": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "claim": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "claim": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "claim": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L136", + "hash": "0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "claim": "External `grill-me/grilling`", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "claim": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "claim": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "claim": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "claim": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L137", + "hash": "89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "claim": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "claim": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "claim": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "claim": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "claim": "A consensus is not proof.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "claim": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L138", + "hash": "c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "claim": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "claim": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "claim": "These are contextual method requirements.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "claim": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L139", + "hash": "57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "claim": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "claim": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "claim": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "claim": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "claim": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L140", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L141", + "hash": "46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "claim": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "claim": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "claim": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "claim": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L142", + "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", + "status": "structural", + "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", + "clauses": [] + }, + { + "id": "rationale.L143", + "hash": "0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85", + "status": "nonformal", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", + "clauses": [ + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "claim": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "claim": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "claim": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "claim": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", + "declarations": [], + "status": "unresolved", + "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." + } + ] + } + ], + "declarations": [ + { + "name": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c5" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c2" + }, + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c3" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c4" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L119", + "clause": "r-119-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c2" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c3" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L77", + "clause": "r-77-c3" + } + ] + }, + { + "name": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", + "kind": "case", + "file": "RationaleReader.lean", + "sources": [ + { + "unit": "rationale.L121", + "clause": "r-121-c4" + } + ] + } + ], + "cases": [ + { + "id": "original_comparison", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "update_read_counterexample", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "cached_freshness_refuted", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "unchanged_update_retained", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "budget_change_is_distinct", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "namedUniversalTruth", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "encoded_statement", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "different_statement_refuted", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "proof_of_different_claim", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", + "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." + }, + { + "id": "revised_method_retains_case", + "declaration": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", + "kind": "method_coverage_fixture", + "expectation": "Compute both read implementations on initial and post-update states, retaining the initial case; no implementation is changed." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/philosophy.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/philosophy.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3705ff1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/philosophy.md @@ -0,0 +1,153 @@ +--- +format_version: 0.1.0 +philosophy_version: 0.1.3 +core_version: 0.1.3 +derived_from: null +--- +# Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds + + +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. + +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. + +## 1. Charter + + +### 1.1 Overview + + +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. + +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. + +### 1.2 Self-Transcendence + + +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. + +#### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation + + +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. + +#### 1.2.2 Non-finality + + +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. + +#### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits + + +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. + +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. + +### 1.3 Internal Consistency + + +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. + +#### 1.3.1 Meaning + + +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. + +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. + +#### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. + +### 1.4 Reflexivity + + +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. + +#### 1.4.1 Meaning + + +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. + +#### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits + + +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. + +## 2. Grounds + + +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. + +### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment + + +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. + +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | + +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. + +### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement + + +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. + +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. + +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. + +### 2.3 Capability Claims + + +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. + +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. + +### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives + + +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. + +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. + +#### 2.4.1 Conditions and Limits + + +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. + +## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms + + +### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints + + +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. + +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. + +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. + +### 3.2 Necessary Terms + + +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..78a8869 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md @@ -0,0 +1,143 @@ +# Organon Rationale + +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). It does not add obligations to the philosophy. + +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. + +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Generative Drive | Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. | Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. | +| Internal Consistency and Reflexivity | Charter, unchanged. | Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. | +| Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries | Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. | General requirements and limits retain their normative force. The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. | +| Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation | Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. | The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations | Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. | The provision and its conditions remain. Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. | +| Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships | Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. | Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. | + +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. + +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Self-Transcendence | Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. | Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. | +| Internal Consistency | If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. This supports examining their compatibility. | A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. | +| Reflexivity | A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. | Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. | +| Grounds | When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. | Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations | If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. | Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. They are not disallowed; the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. | + +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. + +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. The current core withdraws that uniform definition. Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. + +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. + +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. + +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. Each choice needs contextual reasons. These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. + +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. + +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. + +## 3. Removal Check + +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | +| --- | --- | +| Self-Transcendence | The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. | +| Internal Consistency | There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. | +| Reflexivity | Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. | +| Grounds | The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. | +| Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds | General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. | + +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. + +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. These examine the meaning of the philosophy; they are not steps a system is required to execute. + +| Case | Judgment and limits | +| --- | --- | +| A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. | Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. | +| A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. | Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. | +| A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. | It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. | +| Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. | Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. | +| Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. | This violates internal consistency. Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. | +| A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. | This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. | +| Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. | Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. Grounds requires examination of the support relation. | +| A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. | The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. | +| A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. | It can be assessed as a value commitment. Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. | +| A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. | It may provide corresponding limited support. Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. | +| A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. | Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. | +| An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. | The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. These capability definitions come from the application. | +| An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. | Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. | +| An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; the same reliable black box cannot do so. | Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. | +| After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. | A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. | +| A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. | The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. | +| An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. | Conventional use is not the sole ground. Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. | +| An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. | Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. | +| Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. | This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. | +| A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. | Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. | +| An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. | Renaming alone adds no support. Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. | + +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. + +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. + +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; they cannot replace philosophical argument. These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. + +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +The following are hypothetical applications. Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; their conclusions hold within those premises. + +### 6.1 Research Team + +| Argument element | Application | +| --- | --- | +| Claim | A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. | +| Additional premises | The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; the material does not establish population prevalence. | +| Inference | Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. | +| Counterexample | An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. | +| Conclusion | The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; the number of labels alone cannot. Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. | + +### 6.2 Software System + +| Argument element | Application | +| --- | --- | +| Claim | A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. | +| Additional premises | The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. | +| Inference | Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. | +| Counterexample | Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. | +| Conclusion | The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. | + +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. + +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. + +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | +| --- | --- | --- | +| English authority with a corresponding Chinese version | The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. | No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. Another project could select a different language. | +| A text-centered core and script-free skills | The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. | Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; their absence here is a design choice. | +| `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` | Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. | Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. | +| `organon-core-principled-review` | A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. | Findings retain their standards and limits; they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. | +| External `grill-me/grilling` | Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. | A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. | +| An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal | A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. | Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. A consensus is not proof. A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. | +| Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations | This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. | These are contextual method requirements. A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. | +| A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment | Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. | A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. | + +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. + +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. diff --git a/lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md b/lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..326cf00 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +> Historical result of the preceding reader task, before Core owned the runtime. Current migration results are recorded separately. + +# Validation of the Core 0.1.3 reader edition + +This is a local delivery record dated 2026-09-13. It separates machine checks from reported source correspondence. The source text and its Chinese translation remain unchanged. + +| Check | Actual result | Evidence | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Philosophy Lean build, declaration/dependency audit and four manuscript views | Pass; 18 registered declarations; 123 entries | [Actual result](../core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json) | +| Rationale Lean build, declaration/dependency audit and four manuscript views | Pass; 10 registered declarations; 371 entries | [Actual result](../core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json) | +| Complete `rtk proxy node --test` | 82 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped; all 35 manuscript tests and 17 pre-existing Lean checker tests passed | [Complete actual output](../validation/final-node-tests.json) | +| Existing management test failure | The task-start snapshot reproduces the same obsolete expected philosophy-body hash. The test and source bodies were preserved, not changed to obtain a green result | [Baseline reproduction](../validation/preexisting-management-failure.json) | +| Both Lean skill format checks | Pass | [Formalization skill](../validation/final-skill-format.json), [translation skill](../validation/final-translator-format.json) | +| Independent final difference review and ordinary-copy rerun | Pass for both fresh builds and manuscript checks; no fidelity upgrade | [Review](../validation/independent-final-review.md), [Copy results](../validation/relocation.json) | +| English and Chinese source-format checks | Pass; 22 matching stable units | [Actual output](../validation/final-source-format.json) | + +The full suite is **not green**. Its existing failure is in `tests/management.test.js`, which still expects an older English philosophy-body hash. The observed current normalized body hash is `41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1`; the expected hash is `2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57`. This task did not revise that migration baseline. + +Reported fidelity is 14 limited correspondences and 2 rejected correspondences, with 370 incomplete entries and 108 structural or inapplicable entries. **Zero complete source claims are reported passed.** These are navigation entries, not a measure of philosophical quality. All 424 extracted clauses and 228 nonblank Lean lines have bilingual presentation; this does not establish complete atomic claim segmentation or full formalization. + +Three bounded revisions addressed initial compilation, independently observed source mismatches, and reader/status-checking defects. The final new adversarial case rejects using a countermodel that supports a negative source claim as the sole reason to mark that source claim failed. Kernel results remain separate from source correspondence throughout. Independent first records, informed comparisons, initial code translation and informed code updates are included in each package's `reviews/` directory. Initial exposure limitations are disclosed in the [package overview](../README.md). + +The two rejected attempts concern the missing support relation in an observation-coverage model and the missing substantive examination behind a grounds-ID test. They remain visible as failed source correspondences, although their formulas pass Lean. Assessment's mixed-responsibility and omitted-label clauses have limited correspondence; its full source duty is not certified. diff --git a/lean/rationale-details.md b/lean/rationale-details.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..529ad63 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/rationale-details.md @@ -0,0 +1,8521 @@ +# Rationale — Lean line explanations + +This edition uses the revised Core-tooling rationale source. Unchanged code and its initial explanation are reused, not newly blind-reviewed; the changed implementation row remains unmodeled. The preceding source and reader are retained as historical evidence. + +Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c`. [Frozen source](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](rationale-overview.md). + +These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. + +No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. + +Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 264, 'limited': 7}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-68). + + +```lean +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-73). + + +```lean +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-78). + + +```lean +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-87). + + +```lean +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-60). + + +```lean +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-31). + + +```lean +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-46). + + +```lean +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-54). + + +```lean +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-101). + + +```lean +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide +``` + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Table-cell implementation label; no independent theorem is asserted. + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + + + + +## Complete checked code and line explanations + +Code SHA256: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7`. The initial translation was saved before source comparison; the current code revision below has an explicitly informed update. + + +```lean +namespace RationaleReader + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison +rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +end RationaleReader +``` + + + + + **L1** Open the RationaleReader namespace. + + + + **L3** Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. + + + + **L4** Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. + + + + **L5** Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. + + + + **L6** Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. + + + + **L8** Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. + + + + **L10** Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. + + + + **L12** Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. + + + + **L14** Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. + + + + **L16** Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. + + + + **L17** Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. + + + + **L18** Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. + + + + **L19** Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. + + + + **L21** Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. + + + + **L23** Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. + + + + **L25** Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. + + + + **L26** Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. + + + + **L28** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L29** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L30** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L31** State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. + + + + **L32** Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. + + + + **L33** Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). + + + + **L35** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L36** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L37** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L38** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L39** Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. + + + + **L40** The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. + + + + **L41** The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. + + + + **L43** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L44** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L45** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L46** State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. + + + + **L47** Assume this universal equality for contradiction. + + + + **L48** Specialize it to 11. + + + + **L49** Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. + + + + **L51** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L52** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L53** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L54** Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. + + + + **L55** Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. + + + + **L57** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L58** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L59** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L60** Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. + + + + **L61** State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. + + + + **L62** Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. + + + + **L63** Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. + + + + **L65** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L66** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L67** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L68** For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. + + + + **L70** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L71** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L72** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L73** Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. + + + + **L75** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L76** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L77** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L78** State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. + + + + **L79** Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. + + + + **L80** Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. + + + + **L81** Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. + + + + **L82** In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. + + + + **L84** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L85** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L86** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L87** Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. + + + + **L88** State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. + + + + **L89** Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. + + + + **L91** Define originalStates as the singleton state list [initial], whose only state has fields (10, 10). + + + + **L93** Define revisedStates as [initial, updateOnly initial 11], keeping the exact original state and appending the state (11, 10). This is a list of pure states, not an execution trace with timing. + + + + **L95** Define compareReads from a finite ServiceState list to a finite list of pairs of natural numbers; × denotes the product type. + + + + **L96** Map each state to its direct and cachedRead projections in that order. List.map preserves list order and length. The function records pairs; it does not itself test equality or decide equivalence. + + + + **L98** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. + + + + **L99** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. + + + + **L100** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. + + + + **L101** Begin a concrete theorem recording the outputs for the original and revised state lists. + + + + **L102** The first conjunct says compareReads on originalStates is exactly the singleton pair list [(10, 10)]. + + + + **L103** The second says the revised output is exactly [(10, 10), (11, 10)]. Decide computes both equalities. The old agreeing pair is retained and the new disagreeing pair is present; no service repair is claimed. + + + + **L105** Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/rationale-overview.md b/lean/rationale-overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c00825a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/rationale-overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,8746 @@ +# Rationale — claim overview + +This edition uses the revised Core-tooling rationale source. Unchanged code and its initial explanation are reused, not newly blind-reviewed; the changed implementation row remains unmodeled. The preceding source and reader are retained as historical evidence. + +Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c`. [Frozen source](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](rationale-details.md). + +These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. + +No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. + +Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 264, 'limited': 7}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-1) + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-2) + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-3-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-3-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-4) + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-6) + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-7) + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-8) + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-9) + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-10) + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-17) + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-18) + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-19) + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-20) + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-21) + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-22-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-22-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-23) + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-24) + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-25) + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-31) + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-33) + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-34) + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-35) + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-37) + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-39) + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-41) + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-42) + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-43) + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-45) + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-46) + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-47) + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-49) + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-51) + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-52) + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-53) + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-54) + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-55) + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-59-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-59-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-60-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-60-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-61) + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-63) + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-64) + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-65) + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-67) + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-68) + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-69) + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-72-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-72-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-75-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-75-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-68). + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-73). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-78). + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-87). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-84-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-84-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-91) + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-92) + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-93) + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-95) + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-97) + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-99) + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-100) + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-101) + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-103) + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-104) + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-105) + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-106) + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-107) + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-108-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-108-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-113) + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-114) + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-115) + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-116) + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-117) + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-118-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-118-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-60). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-31). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-46). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. + +**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · Limited + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. + +**Checked declarations and dependencies:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-54). + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-101). + +The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-123) + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-125) + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-126) + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-127) + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-128-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-128-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-129) + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-130) + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-131) + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling +``` + +**Scope and loss:** Table-cell implementation label; no independent theorem is asserted. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c7 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c7) + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-140) + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · Not applicable + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text + + +``` + +**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-142) + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · Incomplete + + + +**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**Exact source:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. + +[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c4) + + diff --git a/lean/validation/final-node-tests.json b/lean/validation/final-node-tests.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..628fc9d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/final-node-tests.json @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +{ + "command": "rtk proxy node --test", + "chunk_id": "c2caf5", + "wall_time_seconds": 1.625e-06, + "exit_code": 1, + "original_token_count": 4550, + "output": "TAP version 13\n# Subtest: stableUniqueLoop: declared examples and input ownership\nok 1 - stableUniqueLoop: declared examples and input ownership\n ---\n duration_ms: 1.148709\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueLoop: rejects invalid input\nok 2 - stableUniqueLoop: rejects invalid input\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.165625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueReduce: declared examples and input ownership\nok 3 - stableUniqueReduce: declared examples and input ownership\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.178833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueReduce: rejects invalid input\nok 4 - stableUniqueReduce: rejects invalid input\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.062959\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: known bad replacement has the surface shape but violates order\nok 5 - known bad replacement has the surface shape but violates order\n ---\n duration_ms: 1.144208\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\nok 6 - comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.870375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 7 - provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.552333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 8 - provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.007667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 9 - provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.775333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\nok 10 - real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\n ---\n duration_ms: 693.244125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\nok 11 - real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\n ---\n duration_ms: 691.915\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\nok 12 - real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\n ---\n duration_ms: 666.203125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\nok 13 - partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\n ---\n duration_ms: 548.860125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\nok 14 - a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.832292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\nok 15 - real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\n ---\n duration_ms: 551.764667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\nok 16 - real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\n ---\n duration_ms: 552.287125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\nok 17 - real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\n ---\n duration_ms: 558.274833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\nok 18 - real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\n ---\n duration_ms: 999.631083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\nok 19 - source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\n ---\n duration_ms: 10.050667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\nok 20 - missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.3265\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\nok 21 - unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.086084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\nok 22 - preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.289708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\nok 23 - four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.21775\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\nok 24 - reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\n ---\n duration_ms: 10.649958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 25 - snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.583167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 26 - code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.298459\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 27 - review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.296666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 28 - initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.390125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 29 - manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.207625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\nok 30 - current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.383416\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 31 - missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.162834\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 32 - review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.986417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 33 - missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 11.212333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 34 - changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 14.21525\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 35 - entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.368167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 36 - declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.999584\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 37 - code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.941042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 38 - excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.899292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 39 - false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.859708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 40 - language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.692875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 41 - quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.560875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 42 - code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.424875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 43 - line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.639292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 44 - line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.318875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 45 - invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.899667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\nok 46 - unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.736042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\nok 47 - countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.50975\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\nok 48 - a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.754\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\nok 49 - kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.167833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\nok 50 - absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.663458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\nok 51 - ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\n ---\n duration_ms: 20.328958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\nok 52 - optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\n ---\n duration_ms: 1384.673375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\nok 53 - a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.4405\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public references cannot depend on a private local directory\nok 54 - public references cannot depend on a private local directory\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.332541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\nok 55 - a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.845917\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\nok 56 - current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.6515\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\nok 57 - public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.945417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\nnot ok 58 - source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.833458\n type: 'test'\n location: '/tests/management.test.js:45:1'\n failureType: 'testCodeFailure'\n error: |-\n Expected values to be strictly equal:\n + actual - expected\n \n + '41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1'\n - '2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57'\n \n code: 'ERR_ASSERTION'\n name: 'AssertionError'\n expected: '2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57'\n actual: '41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1'\n operator: 'strictEqual'\n stack: |-\n TestContext. (/tests/management.test.js:52:10)\n Test.runInAsyncScope (node:async_hooks:214:14)\n Test.run (node:internal/test_runner/test:1047:25)\n Test.start (node:internal/test_runner/test:944:17)\n startSubtestAfterBootstrap (node:internal/test_runner/harness:296:17)\n ...\n# Subtest: frontmatter subset rejects unsupported syntax, duplicates and unsupported format\nok 59 - frontmatter subset rejects unsupported syntax, duplicates and unsupported format\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.433958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: heading units cover parent provisions and ignore fenced examples\nok 60 - heading units cover parent provisions and ignore fenced examples\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.332333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: hashes normalize line endings only; title and body have separate identities\nok 61 - hashes normalize line endings only; title and body have separate identities\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.128458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: five mutually exclusive statuses cover presence and deletion combinations\nok 62 - five mutually exclusive statuses cover presence and deletion combinations\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.105416\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: init creates a regular managed copy, lineage and empty Extensions; never overwrites\nok 63 - init creates a regular managed copy, lineage and empty Extensions; never overwrites\n ---\n duration_ms: 111.654875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: resolution uses repository root then cwd and never falls back after explicit failure\nok 64 - resolution uses repository root then cwd and never falls back after explicit failure\n ---\n duration_ms: 95.012833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: core merge rejects stale candidate and lock while a valid plan applies exact choices\nok 65 - core merge rejects stale candidate and lock while a valid plan applies exact choices\n ---\n duration_ms: 147.278791\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declines survive source checkpoint advance and local edits; changed source reopens proposal\nok 66 - declines survive source checkpoint advance and local edits; changed source reopens proposal\n ---\n duration_ms: 257.474958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: delete/modify is conflict and declined deletion uses explicit absent state\nok 67 - delete/modify is conflict and declined deletion uses explicit absent state\n ---\n duration_ms: 132.113792\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: foreign import is two-way, scopes decline memory and does not advance Core\nok 68 - foreign import is two-way, scopes decline memory and does not advance Core\n ---\n duration_ms: 159.134042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: verified old source is optional; provenance alone cannot supply base text\nok 69 - verified old source is optional; provenance alone cannot supply base text\n ---\n duration_ms: 78.909166\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: heading rename, parent and order changes are visible without invented body conflicts\nok 70 - heading rename, parent and order changes are visible without invented body conflicts\n ---\n duration_ms: 74.08625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: export excludes marked subtree after renaming/moving and preserves source bytes\nok 71 - export excludes marked subtree after renaming/moving and preserves source bytes\n ---\n duration_ms: 71.058459\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: incorrect or incomplete decisions cannot apply a different candidate\nok 72 - incorrect or incomplete decisions cannot apply a different candidate\n ---\n duration_ms: 67.181375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: pair failure restores original file and lock; interrupted writes can be recovered\nok 73 - pair failure restores original file and lock; interrupted writes can be recovered\n ---\n duration_ms: 111.34275\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: recovery refuses an unrelated concurrent edit and keeps its journal\nok 74 - recovery refuses an unrelated concurrent edit and keeps its journal\n ---\n duration_ms: 57.739375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: all write operations reject symlinks and protected Core targets without changing either\nok 75 - all write operations reject symlinks and protected Core targets without changing either\n ---\n duration_ms: 75.509625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: CLI errors return nonzero JSON and source check is executable\nok 76 - CLI errors return nonzero JSON and source check is executable\n ---\n duration_ms: 118.895333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsupported ATX spellings cannot silently hide unnumbered sections\nok 77 - unsupported ATX spellings cannot silently hide unnumbered sections\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.160083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: pending transaction detection uses the physical target across parent aliases\nok 78 - pending transaction detection uses the physical target across parent aliases\n ---\n duration_ms: 124.939583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: interrupted sources cannot enter export, init or another merge\nok 79 - interrupted sources cannot enter export, init or another merge\n ---\n duration_ms: 113.568334\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a sibling document cannot borrow the managed identity from an unrelated sidecar\nok 80 - a sibling document cannot borrow the managed identity from an unrelated sidecar\n ---\n duration_ms: 53.40175\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: input validation runs under the exclusive transaction before any document write\nok 81 - input validation runs under the exclusive transaction before any document write\n ---\n duration_ms: 71.752334\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: version warnings respect the manifest range without becoming format judgments\nok 82 - version warnings respect the manifest range without becoming format judgments\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.17775\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: each reviewed input is bound, including source, current text, decisions and record\nok 83 - each reviewed input is bound, including source, current text, decisions and record\n ---\n duration_ms: 70.921041\n type: 'test'\n ...\n1..83\n# tests 83\n# suites 0\n# pass 82\n# fail 1\n# cancelled 0\n# skipped 0\n# todo 0\n# duration_ms 5414.634125\n" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/final-skill-format.json b/lean/validation/final-skill-format.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5a78e72 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/final-skill-format.json @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +{ + "command": "skill-format", + "chunk_id": "50ad34", + "wall_time_seconds": 2.667e-06, + "exit_code": 0, + "original_token_count": 4, + "output": "Skill is valid!\n" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/final-source-format.json b/lean/validation/final-source-format.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9e64bec --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/final-source-format.json @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +[ + { + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "scripts/check.js", + "--source", + "OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"file\": \"/OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"realPath\": \"/OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"mode\": \"source\",\n \"sections\": 22,\n \"warnings\": []\n}\n", + "stderr": "" + }, + { + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "scripts/check.js", + "--source", + "OrganonCore/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"file\": \"/OrganonCore/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"realPath\": \"/OrganonCore/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"mode\": \"source\",\n \"sections\": 22,\n \"warnings\": []\n}\n", + "stderr": "" + } +] diff --git a/lean/validation/final-translator-format.json b/lean/validation/final-translator-format.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ce40eb --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/final-translator-format.json @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@ +{ + "command": "translator-format", + "chunk_id": "1d6fba", + "wall_time_seconds": 1.709e-06, + "exit_code": 0, + "original_token_count": 4, + "output": "Skill is valid!\n" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json b/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dccbc5a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "--test" + ], + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "TAP version 13\n# Subtest: comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\nok 1 - comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.832166\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 2 - provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.732292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 3 - provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.212875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 4 - provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.804125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\nok 5 - real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\n ---\n duration_ms: 911.260083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\nok 6 - real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\n ---\n duration_ms: 677.572084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\nok 7 - real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\n ---\n duration_ms: 754.556167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\nok 8 - partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\n ---\n duration_ms: 660.31525\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\nok 9 - a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.76025\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\nok 10 - real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\n ---\n duration_ms: 665.11825\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\nok 11 - real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\n ---\n duration_ms: 663.675292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\nok 12 - real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\n ---\n duration_ms: 663.900709\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\nok 13 - real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\n ---\n duration_ms: 1102.508417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\nok 14 - source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\n ---\n duration_ms: 13.646708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\nok 15 - missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.633125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\nok 16 - unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.336709\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\nok 17 - preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.416417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\nok 18 - four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.197333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\nok 19 - reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\n ---\n duration_ms: 16.197042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 20 - snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.084833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 21 - code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.318291\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 22 - review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.282584\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 23 - initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.24\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 24 - manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.598125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\nok 25 - current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.00775\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 26 - missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.022167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 27 - review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.828458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 28 - missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.581417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 29 - changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.989417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 30 - entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.80625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 31 - declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 23.944916\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 32 - code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.477875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 33 - excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.697833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 34 - false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.936\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 35 - language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.85675\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 36 - quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.9385\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 37 - code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 10.943709\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 38 - line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.981\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 39 - line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.116958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 40 - invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.808792\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\nok 41 - unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.794875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\nok 42 - countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.139375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\nok 43 - a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.967916\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\nok 44 - kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\n ---\n duration_ms: 17.021125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\nok 45 - absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\n ---\n duration_ms: 14.435459\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\nok 46 - ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\n ---\n duration_ms: 13.538916\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\nok 47 - optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\n ---\n duration_ms: 1818.730958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\nok 48 - a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.046625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public references cannot depend on a private local directory\nok 49 - public references cannot depend on a private local directory\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.403583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\nok 50 - a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.5345\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\nok 51 - current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.596125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\nok 52 - public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.897041\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\nok 53 - Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\n ---\n duration_ms: 149.353125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n1..53\n# tests 53\n# suites 0\n# pass 53\n# fail 0\n# cancelled 0\n# skipped 0\n# todo 0\n# duration_ms 6277.68175\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/independent-review.md b/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/independent-review.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..085dbb7 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/independent-review.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# Independent hash-baseline review + +The independent reviewer compared the current bilingual philosophy with the approved C1 expected files and adoption manifest. Both complete texts and SHA-256 digests match. The prior Core HEAD matches the approved before files: the only changes are the authorized Assessment clarification and philosophy/core metadata from 0.1.2 to 0.1.3. The old fixed test hashes correspond to that preceding text, so updating the two expected constants is justified without changing the philosophy or normalization algorithm. + +Using the same parsed direct body with ID comments removed, the new expected hashes are English `41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1` and Chinese `27d81360a31a44fa207bcee48d08b09da18d2f0d58beb592879b779ac5ad9cf5`. Independent in-memory alterations of each Assessment body produce different hashes, preserving detection of future text changes. No blocking finding remained. This is a test-baseline correction, not a new philosophical judgment or proof. diff --git a/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json b/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..02796c4 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "--test" + ], + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "TAP version 13\n# Subtest: stableUniqueLoop: declared examples and input ownership\nok 1 - stableUniqueLoop: declared examples and input ownership\n ---\n duration_ms: 1.149667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueLoop: rejects invalid input\nok 2 - stableUniqueLoop: rejects invalid input\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.162875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueReduce: declared examples and input ownership\nok 3 - stableUniqueReduce: declared examples and input ownership\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.101708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueReduce: rejects invalid input\nok 4 - stableUniqueReduce: rejects invalid input\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.05025\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: known bad replacement has the surface shape but violates order\nok 5 - known bad replacement has the surface shape but violates order\n ---\n duration_ms: 1.034666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\nok 6 - comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.838084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 7 - provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.658459\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 8 - provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.02175\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 9 - provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\nok 10 - real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\n ---\n duration_ms: 846.293792\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\nok 11 - real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\n ---\n duration_ms: 803.581083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\nok 12 - real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\n ---\n duration_ms: 677.124167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\nok 13 - partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\n ---\n duration_ms: 659.979042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\nok 14 - a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.681583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\nok 15 - real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\n ---\n duration_ms: 664.665541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\nok 16 - real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\n ---\n duration_ms: 664.337708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\nok 17 - real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\n ---\n duration_ms: 663.789\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\nok 18 - real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\n ---\n duration_ms: 1102.494042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\nok 19 - source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\n ---\n duration_ms: 13.617\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\nok 20 - missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.795042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\nok 21 - unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.313167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\nok 22 - preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.619541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\nok 23 - four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\n ---\n duration_ms: 16.654083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\nok 24 - reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.922375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 25 - snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.664375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 26 - code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.045625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 27 - review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.502541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 28 - initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.748125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 29 - manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.756\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\nok 30 - current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.317333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 31 - missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.102208\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 32 - review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.202541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 33 - missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 26.773917\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 34 - changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.509083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 35 - entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.385958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 36 - declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.2795\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 37 - code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.275916\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 38 - excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.735167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 39 - false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.942958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 40 - language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 11.74\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 41 - quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.079209\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 42 - code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.033333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 43 - line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.610416\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 44 - line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.966084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 45 - invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.615125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\nok 46 - unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.533375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\nok 47 - countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 29.612833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\nok 48 - a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.883333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\nok 49 - kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.0355\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\nok 50 - absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.651958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\nok 51 - ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\n ---\n duration_ms: 10.224541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\nok 52 - optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\n ---\n duration_ms: 1806.240084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\nok 53 - a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.129584\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public references cannot depend on a private local directory\nok 54 - public references cannot depend on a private local directory\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.350625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\nok 55 - a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.664125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\nok 56 - current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.663834\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\nok 57 - public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.697834\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\nok 58 - Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\n ---\n duration_ms: 142.038\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: old Lean and parser import paths expose the Core implementations\nok 59 - old Lean and parser import paths expose the Core implementations\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.848583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: old Lean CLI keeps its usage, exit status and argument dispatch\nok 60 - old Lean CLI keeps its usage, exit status and argument dispatch\n ---\n duration_ms: 449.273167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: version warnings retain the outer package configuration as their default\nok 61 - version warnings retain the outer package configuration as their default\n ---\n duration_ms: 56.414166\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\nok 62 - source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\n ---\n duration_ms: 20.575834\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: frontmatter subset rejects unsupported syntax, duplicates and unsupported format\nok 63 - frontmatter subset rejects unsupported syntax, duplicates and unsupported format\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.416417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: heading units cover parent provisions and ignore fenced examples\nok 64 - heading units cover parent provisions and ignore fenced examples\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.368417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: hashes normalize line endings only; title and body have separate identities\nok 65 - hashes normalize line endings only; title and body have separate identities\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.139709\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: five mutually exclusive statuses cover presence and deletion combinations\nok 66 - five mutually exclusive statuses cover presence and deletion combinations\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.109875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: init creates a regular managed copy, lineage and empty Extensions; never overwrites\nok 67 - init creates a regular managed copy, lineage and empty Extensions; never overwrites\n ---\n duration_ms: 138.049583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: resolution uses repository root then cwd and never falls back after explicit failure\nok 68 - resolution uses repository root then cwd and never falls back after explicit failure\n ---\n duration_ms: 114.39425\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: core merge rejects stale candidate and lock while a valid plan applies exact choices\nok 69 - core merge rejects stale candidate and lock while a valid plan applies exact choices\n ---\n duration_ms: 160.897583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declines survive source checkpoint advance and local edits; changed source reopens proposal\nok 70 - declines survive source checkpoint advance and local edits; changed source reopens proposal\n ---\n duration_ms: 263.672875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: delete/modify is conflict and declined deletion uses explicit absent state\nok 71 - delete/modify is conflict and declined deletion uses explicit absent state\n ---\n duration_ms: 136.519042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: foreign import is two-way, scopes decline memory and does not advance Core\nok 72 - foreign import is two-way, scopes decline memory and does not advance Core\n ---\n duration_ms: 164.13975\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: verified old source is optional; provenance alone cannot supply base text\nok 73 - verified old source is optional; provenance alone cannot supply base text\n ---\n duration_ms: 79.782583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: heading rename, parent and order changes are visible without invented body conflicts\nok 74 - heading rename, parent and order changes are visible without invented body conflicts\n ---\n duration_ms: 82.305541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: export excludes marked subtree after renaming/moving and preserves source bytes\nok 75 - export excludes marked subtree after renaming/moving and preserves source bytes\n ---\n duration_ms: 70.051583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: incorrect or incomplete decisions cannot apply a different candidate\nok 76 - incorrect or incomplete decisions cannot apply a different candidate\n ---\n duration_ms: 74.189084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: pair failure restores original file and lock; interrupted writes can be recovered\nok 77 - pair failure restores original file and lock; interrupted writes can be recovered\n ---\n duration_ms: 112.694917\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: recovery refuses an unrelated concurrent edit and keeps its journal\nok 78 - recovery refuses an unrelated concurrent edit and keeps its journal\n ---\n duration_ms: 53.868833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: all write operations reject symlinks and protected Core targets without changing either\nok 79 - all write operations reject symlinks and protected Core targets without changing either\n ---\n duration_ms: 72.705417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: CLI errors return nonzero JSON and source check is executable\nok 80 - CLI errors return nonzero JSON and source check is executable\n ---\n duration_ms: 127.968583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsupported ATX spellings cannot silently hide unnumbered sections\nok 81 - unsupported ATX spellings cannot silently hide unnumbered sections\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.236375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: pending transaction detection uses the physical target across parent aliases\nok 82 - pending transaction detection uses the physical target across parent aliases\n ---\n duration_ms: 125.432625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: interrupted sources cannot enter export, init or another merge\nok 83 - interrupted sources cannot enter export, init or another merge\n ---\n duration_ms: 114.656042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a sibling document cannot borrow the managed identity from an unrelated sidecar\nok 84 - a sibling document cannot borrow the managed identity from an unrelated sidecar\n ---\n duration_ms: 57.266708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: input validation runs under the exclusive transaction before any document write\nok 85 - input validation runs under the exclusive transaction before any document write\n ---\n duration_ms: 79.139458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: version warnings respect the manifest range without becoming format judgments\nok 86 - version warnings respect the manifest range without becoming format judgments\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.212125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: each reviewed input is bound, including source, current text, decisions and record\nok 87 - each reviewed input is bound, including source, current text, decisions and record\n ---\n duration_ms: 79.23525\n type: 'test'\n ...\n1..87\n# tests 87\n# suites 0\n# pass 87\n# fail 0\n# cancelled 0\n# skipped 0\n# todo 0\n# duration_ms 6276.883375\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/independent-final-review.md b/lean/validation/independent-final-review.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1218bd0 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/independent-final-review.md @@ -0,0 +1,25 @@ +# Independent final review export + +This is the actual informed final review. It is not a new blind assessment. Local evidence filenames in the narrative identify retained historical records; the portable-copy results are separately delivered in [relocation.json](relocation.json). Original SHA256: `c2c3b392d6b679994be815b221ebbf6f334dbea895f1d470c086231cee388eaf`. + +# 第三轮末次差异复核 + +日期：2026-09-13。性质：知情的末次差异复核，沿用固定Core 0.1.3与已有初评，不新增轮次、不递归评审。仅检查上一轮发现的失败资格门、两个拒绝项当前措辞、双语逐行导航及其绑定变化。旧初评、清单与第一轮判断hash实查保持不变。 + +## 已解决的问题 + +1. 失败资格门现在只在kernel failed、fidelity rejected、或反模型明确refutes_source时允许整体failed。对先前独立合成fixture原样重跑：limited控制仍通过；supports_nonentailment但整体failed的变体现在被拒绝，返回“Failure needs a recorded cause: claim.1”。仓库新增单项回归也实际通过（1项，0失败、0跳过）。原先由“反驳待测蕴涵”误推“源条目失败”的接口缺口已修正。中文可见语义相反但标记不变的边界fixture仍能机械通过，这继续符合已公开的非语义认证范围，并非新遗留缺陷。 +2. c-89-c2与c-94-c3现以“保留受检尝试，但明确拒绝源对应，不作为原文责任证明”说明交付结果，不再对读者留下“是否尚未执行撤回”的指令语气。其前面的全部实质缺口说明逐字保留：覆盖不等于支持、无观测内容/比例关系，编号相等不等于考察支持关系。英文与中文表达同一结果；kernel passed与fidelity rejected状态未变，未改写哲学或历史评审。 +3. 声明到逐行解释新增116个链接，四份详解共456个line-N锚点（228行×2种语言），均唯一且目标存在。读者可从条目直接跳到解释，不必只跳到Lean文件。解释文本及全部源摘录未被改变。 + +## 差异与实际运行证据 + +对8稿与先前独立普通副本逐字比较：去除已登记的导航新增、将两段旧建议替换为当前结果后，所有稿件恰好相等。全部状态标记顺序与内容不变。没有发现夹带限定删除或其它措辞变化。逐文件结果及新hash见reader-round3-delta-checks.json。 + +更新普通副本中的8稿、两run的run/manuscript/fidelity对象，并复制当前checker及其本地解析依赖，再实际使用副本checker调用两工程。Core build=0、audit=0、18声明、123条；rationale build=0、audit=0、10声明、371条。两者kernel_passed及manuscript.passed均true，semantic_status仍not_evaluated。完整新build/audit/summary存于副本evidence/checks；索引和针对性回归结果见reader-round3-actual-results.json。该验证独立于原工作树已有的成功结果。 + +## 最终有界判断 + +本审查提出的三个末轮问题已在授权范围内处理并实际验证，无需新增实现、轮次或哲学决策。14条有限对应、2条被拒对应、其它pending/结构状态保持；没有为了非零full或整篇通过而改动标准。语义未覆盖、支持关系未建模、有限样本和假设性场景的边界仍明确存在，这是本交付的报告范围，不因机械检查成功消失。 + +停止本轮审查。原文初评及旧比较保留，新版本与实际证据单独记录。不认证全文形式化、普遍哲学正确性、或所有未检查变体。 diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/diff-review.json b/lean/validation/migration/diff-review.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d887759 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/diff-review.json @@ -0,0 +1,28 @@ +{ + "status": "no unresolved actionable finding in reviewed scope", + "blind_review": false, + "philosophy_version": "0.1.3", + "ordinary_copy": "", + "copy_symlinks": [], + "current_counts": { + "philosophy": 123, + "rationale": 372 + }, + "new_row_states": { + "not_applicable": 1, + "incomplete": 6 + }, + "node_tests": { + "passed": 53, + "failed": 0, + "skipped": 0 + }, + "historical_currentness": "expected stale with kernel replay intact", + "manifest_hashes": { + "lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json": "cf46c770e449675b6eb0fe65798bec9e84b916af2bcfab3ed22f89dd7ea733b4", + "lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json": "bab6d6e6981bca23633a05a1f2a054ea2fba545ea0a2dc9fa9a28747c3036c53", + "lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json": "973288f219afd1356b518894640b5d9035fe669cb5889759471ede2d0a443464" + }, + "excluded_pending_summary": "lean/VALIDATION.md", + "semantic_limit": "informed difference/reuse review; no new blind claim or whole-philosophy proof" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/diff-review.md b/lean/validation/migration/diff-review.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..186e13f --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/diff-review.md @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +# Final independent difference and standalone-delivery review + +2026-09-13. This follows source-initial.md and the informed source comparison. It is an informed migration/difference review, not a new blind backtranslation. No maintained file was edited by this reviewer. The bound comparison export predates its later run-format resolution addendum; the initiator retained that exact earlier prefix and provenance. The command-location finding is resolved in the actual maintained run-format.md. + +## Source, authority, and scope + +Core philosophy stays at 0.1.3 with unchanged source content. English remains authority. Rationale row 133 now describes text-centered philosophy and supporting Lean tools; the wording and Chinese counterpart preserve revisability, ordinary-assessment independence, and the limits of tool success. This is contextual maintenance, not a new philosophical obligation. New Core skills retain roles for proof, source fidelity, source/code comparison, standalone code explanation, compatibility and adoption; outer skills forward inputs and selected baselines. Dependency-aware maintenance explicitly distinguishes accurate completion reporting from proving all claims. + +The new rationale source snapshot hash is 86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c. The preceding snapshot remains 5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44. The current rationale run is a distinct `rationale-core-tools` object rather than overwriting the preceding source. + +## Exact reuse and reader comparison + +- Both current Lean source files are byte-identical to their pre-migration outer originals, including attached mappings and proof statements. +- All four philosophy reader variants match their pre-migration contents after excluding link destinations; no semantic explanation or status changed. +- Rationale manifest has 372 entries, replacing exactly six r-133-c* entries with seven r-133-v2-c* entries. All 365 retained manifest entries are exactly equal, including source excerpts, declarations, statuses and reasons. +- In each rationale language/granularity, retained clause blocks are unchanged after excluding link destinations. Detailed line-explanation appendices are likewise unchanged after excluding URLs. This supports reuse of the earlier code explanations without calling them new blind review. +- The seven new clauses correctly show the table label as not_applicable and the six explanatory claims as incomplete/pending with no declarations. The English and Chinese new blocks preserve exact English source, corresponding Chinese row context, source hash and the same limitation: no Lean encoding/theorem was supplied; explanatory review does not make them proved obligations. +- The new-edition introduction discloses unchanged code/explanation reuse and keeps preceding source/readers as historical evidence. The four historical rationale reader variants label themselves historical. +- All rendered Markdown link destinations in the eight current readers resolve locally. Markdown-looking strings inside exact-source fenced blocks were excluded from link checking; their spelling must remain faithful to source. + +Current counts are philosophy 123 (107 incomplete, 7 not applicable, 7 limited, 2 failed) and rationale 372 (264 incomplete, 101 not applicable, 7 limited). The two rejected philosophy correspondences remain failed; there is no artificial all-pass threshold. These are inventory counts, not a proof-completion score or proof of whole-text fidelity. + +## Actual ordinary-copy replay + +Copied only Core contents to `standalone-core`, excluding `.git`, `.local`, `.lake`, node_modules, Python caches and prior check directories. The copy contains no symlinks and no outer repository package. Invoked the Core checker from that copy with the installed Lean 4.33.1 and Node 22.23.2. Per-command commands, cwd, exit codes and complete stdout/stderr are retained in the neighboring `*-standalone.json` records. + +| Actual command | Result | +| --- | --- | +| `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy --manuscript manuscript.json` | exit 0; kernel and documentary gate pass; source/baseline current; semantic_status not_evaluated | +| `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools --manuscript manuscript.json` | exit 0; kernel and documentary gate pass; source/baseline current; semantic_status not_evaluated | +| `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale` | exit 0; historical frozen-source kernel replay passes | +| `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale --manuscript manuscript.json` | expected exit 1; kernel_passed true; current_source stale, current_baseline current; explicit source-drift reason | +| `node --test` | exit 0; 53 tests passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped | + +No check failure was disguised as success: the historical manuscript rejection is the intended currentness boundary; it leaves its historical theorem intact. The earlier small skill exercise separately retained an actual initial Missing declaration inventory failure and the corrected mechanical run, with source fidelity explicitly unevaluated. + +## Bounded conclusion and self-check + +No unresolved actionable defect remains in the examined migration, rationale wording/translation, reader differences or ordinary-copy execution. The relevant actual behavior and dependency variations have evidence. `lean/VALIDATION.md` is the initiator's pending aggregation at copy time and is outside this review's validated-byte set; it must accurately summarize these results, not create semantic authority. + +This conclusion does not independently re-prove semantic fidelity of unchanged historical formalizations or certify every philosophy/rationale claim. Semantic review reuse rests on unchanged objects and disclosed prior review, not the successful checker or agent agreement. The new rationale components remain unmodeled as recorded. No new philosophical adoption decision or recursive review is warranted by these results. diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-core-tests.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-core-tests.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..24eefd9 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-core-tests.json @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "--test" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "TAP version 13\n# Subtest: comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\nok 1 - comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.836042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 2 - provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.74475\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 3 - provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.14825\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 4 - provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.983875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\nok 5 - real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\n ---\n duration_ms: 822.19\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\nok 6 - real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\n ---\n duration_ms: 703.432667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\nok 7 - real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\n ---\n duration_ms: 692.745791\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\nok 8 - partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\n ---\n duration_ms: 676.581833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\nok 9 - a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.397583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\nok 10 - real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\n ---\n duration_ms: 676.899042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\nok 11 - real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\n ---\n duration_ms: 669.298917\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\nok 12 - real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\n ---\n duration_ms: 674.499667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\nok 13 - real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\n ---\n duration_ms: 1126.457125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\nok 14 - source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\n ---\n duration_ms: 13.276666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\nok 15 - missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.082416\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\nok 16 - unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.253459\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\nok 17 - preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.612292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\nok 18 - four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\n ---\n duration_ms: 11.623792\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\nok 19 - reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\n ---\n duration_ms: 11.850667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 20 - snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.42\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 21 - code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.118792\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 22 - review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.7785\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 23 - initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.0845\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 24 - manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.935\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\nok 25 - current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.362708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 26 - missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.955916\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 27 - review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.102584\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 28 - missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.980875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 29 - changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 18.732291\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 30 - entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.758458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 31 - declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.669458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 32 - code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.463\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 33 - excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.282666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 34 - false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.505\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 35 - language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.268667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 36 - quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.046875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 37 - code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.760209\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 38 - line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.869875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 39 - line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.7375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 40 - invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.197209\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\nok 41 - unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.760333\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\nok 42 - countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.638666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\nok 43 - a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.533583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\nok 44 - kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\n ---\n duration_ms: 15.362958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\nok 45 - absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\n ---\n duration_ms: 10.999458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\nok 46 - ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.557291\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\nok 47 - optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\n ---\n duration_ms: 1567.808542\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\nok 48 - a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.512167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public references cannot depend on a private local directory\nok 49 - public references cannot depend on a private local directory\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.9205\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\nok 50 - a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.296083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\nok 51 - current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.871041\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\nok 52 - public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.239875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\nok 53 - Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\n ---\n duration_ms: 124.930792\n type: 'test'\n ...\n1..53\n# tests 53\n# suites 0\n# pass 53\n# fail 0\n# cancelled 0\n# skipped 0\n# todo 0\n# duration_ms 6217.460833\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-entrypoint-results.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-entrypoint-results.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..db63778 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-entrypoint-results.json @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +[ + { + "kind": "philosophy", + "returncode": 0, + "kernel": true, + "manuscript": true, + "current_source": "current", + "outer_returncode": 0, + "outer_core_results_identical": true + }, + { + "kind": "rationale-core-tools", + "returncode": 0, + "kernel": true, + "manuscript": true, + "current_source": "current", + "outer_returncode": 0, + "outer_core_results_identical": true + }, + { + "kind": "rationale", + "returncode": 1, + "kernel": true, + "manuscript": false, + "current_source": "stale" + } +] \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-lean-natural-language-format.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-lean-natural-language-format.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6ae4673 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-lean-natural-language-format.json @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "python3", + "/scripts/quick_validate.py", + "OrganonCore/skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "Skill is valid!\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..90aac0d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "python3", + "/scripts/quick_validate.py", + "OrganonCore/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "Skill is valid!\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..ddc3b31 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "python3", + "/scripts/quick_validate.py", + "skills/organon-lean-natural-language" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "Skill is valid!\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..0abbb0a --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "python3", + "/scripts/quick_validate.py", + "skills/organon-leanify-prove" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "Skill is valid!\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-outer-tests.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-outer-tests.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..da59004 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-outer-tests.json @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "--test" + ], + "returncode": 1, + "stdout": "TAP version 13\n# Subtest: stableUniqueLoop: declared examples and input ownership\nok 1 - stableUniqueLoop: declared examples and input ownership\n ---\n duration_ms: 1.16825\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueLoop: rejects invalid input\nok 2 - stableUniqueLoop: rejects invalid input\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.164958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueReduce: declared examples and input ownership\nok 3 - stableUniqueReduce: declared examples and input ownership\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.1025\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: stableUniqueReduce: rejects invalid input\nok 4 - stableUniqueReduce: rejects invalid input\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.051\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: known bad replacement has the surface shape but violates order\nok 5 - known bad replacement has the surface shape but violates order\n ---\n duration_ms: 1.038625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\nok 6 - comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.83225\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 7 - provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 10.604208\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 8 - provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.0155\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 9 - provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.159791\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\nok 10 - real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\n ---\n duration_ms: 816.818292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\nok 11 - real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\n ---\n duration_ms: 703.468625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\nok 12 - real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\n ---\n duration_ms: 692.725292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\nok 13 - partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\n ---\n duration_ms: 676.557709\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\nok 14 - a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.49475\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\nok 15 - real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\n ---\n duration_ms: 676.655625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\nok 16 - real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\n ---\n duration_ms: 669.401583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\nok 17 - real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\n ---\n duration_ms: 674.618\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\nok 18 - real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\n ---\n duration_ms: 1126.407\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\nok 19 - source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\n ---\n duration_ms: 13.238\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\nok 20 - missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.108\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\nok 21 - unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.304708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\nok 22 - preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.348417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\nok 23 - four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.363166\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\nok 24 - reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\n ---\n duration_ms: 12.397042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 25 - snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.633667\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 26 - code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.033541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 27 - review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.859208\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 28 - initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.069834\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 29 - manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.702959\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\nok 30 - current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.008\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 31 - missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.710875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 32 - review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.173666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 33 - missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.519375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 34 - changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 23.13725\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 35 - entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.161125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 36 - declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.591167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 37 - code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.452708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 38 - excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.719209\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 39 - false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.489375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 40 - language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.83875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 41 - quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.181167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 42 - code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.016791\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 43 - line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.710792\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 44 - line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.782625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 45 - invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.129458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\nok 46 - unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.782209\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\nok 47 - countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.974292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\nok 48 - a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.84375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\nok 49 - kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.573\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\nok 50 - absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\n ---\n duration_ms: 19.496875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\nok 51 - ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\n ---\n duration_ms: 9.582833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\nok 52 - optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\n ---\n duration_ms: 1534.307916\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\nok 53 - a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.11625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public references cannot depend on a private local directory\nok 54 - public references cannot depend on a private local directory\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.478083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\nok 55 - a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.170917\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\nok 56 - current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.971625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\nok 57 - public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\n ---\n duration_ms: 15.959708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\nok 58 - Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\n ---\n duration_ms: 123.199542\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: old Lean and parser import paths expose the Core implementations\nok 59 - old Lean and parser import paths expose the Core implementations\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.600583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: old Lean CLI keeps its usage, exit status and argument dispatch\nok 60 - old Lean CLI keeps its usage, exit status and argument dispatch\n ---\n duration_ms: 407.796083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: version warnings retain the outer package configuration as their default\nok 61 - version warnings retain the outer package configuration as their default\n ---\n duration_ms: 52.975042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\nnot ok 62 - source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.846541\n type: 'test'\n location: '/tests/management.test.js:45:1'\n failureType: 'testCodeFailure'\n error: |-\n Expected values to be strictly equal:\n + actual - expected\n \n + '41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1'\n - '2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57'\n \n code: 'ERR_ASSERTION'\n name: 'AssertionError'\n expected: '2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57'\n actual: '41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1'\n operator: 'strictEqual'\n stack: |-\n TestContext. (/tests/management.test.js:52:10)\n Test.runInAsyncScope (node:async_hooks:214:14)\n Test.run (node:internal/test_runner/test:1047:25)\n Test.start (node:internal/test_runner/test:944:17)\n startSubtestAfterBootstrap (node:internal/test_runner/harness:296:17)\n ...\n# Subtest: frontmatter subset rejects unsupported syntax, duplicates and unsupported format\nok 63 - frontmatter subset rejects unsupported syntax, duplicates and unsupported format\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.475458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: heading units cover parent provisions and ignore fenced examples\nok 64 - heading units cover parent provisions and ignore fenced examples\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.373708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: hashes normalize line endings only; title and body have separate identities\nok 65 - hashes normalize line endings only; title and body have separate identities\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.134458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: five mutually exclusive statuses cover presence and deletion combinations\nok 66 - five mutually exclusive statuses cover presence and deletion combinations\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.103917\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: init creates a regular managed copy, lineage and empty Extensions; never overwrites\nok 67 - init creates a regular managed copy, lineage and empty Extensions; never overwrites\n ---\n duration_ms: 117.896208\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: resolution uses repository root then cwd and never falls back after explicit failure\nok 68 - resolution uses repository root then cwd and never falls back after explicit failure\n ---\n duration_ms: 89.736334\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: core merge rejects stale candidate and lock while a valid plan applies exact choices\nok 69 - core merge rejects stale candidate and lock while a valid plan applies exact choices\n ---\n duration_ms: 139.083292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declines survive source checkpoint advance and local edits; changed source reopens proposal\nok 70 - declines survive source checkpoint advance and local edits; changed source reopens proposal\n ---\n duration_ms: 229.284666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: delete/modify is conflict and declined deletion uses explicit absent state\nok 71 - delete/modify is conflict and declined deletion uses explicit absent state\n ---\n duration_ms: 117.051083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: foreign import is two-way, scopes decline memory and does not advance Core\nok 72 - foreign import is two-way, scopes decline memory and does not advance Core\n ---\n duration_ms: 155.497708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: verified old source is optional; provenance alone cannot supply base text\nok 73 - verified old source is optional; provenance alone cannot supply base text\n ---\n duration_ms: 69.850083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: heading rename, parent and order changes are visible without invented body conflicts\nok 74 - heading rename, parent and order changes are visible without invented body conflicts\n ---\n duration_ms: 74.091083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: export excludes marked subtree after renaming/moving and preserves source bytes\nok 75 - export excludes marked subtree after renaming/moving and preserves source bytes\n ---\n duration_ms: 68.897291\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: incorrect or incomplete decisions cannot apply a different candidate\nok 76 - incorrect or incomplete decisions cannot apply a different candidate\n ---\n duration_ms: 72.344084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: pair failure restores original file and lock; interrupted writes can be recovered\nok 77 - pair failure restores original file and lock; interrupted writes can be recovered\n ---\n duration_ms: 107.791\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: recovery refuses an unrelated concurrent edit and keeps its journal\nok 78 - recovery refuses an unrelated concurrent edit and keeps its journal\n ---\n duration_ms: 54.480542\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: all write operations reject symlinks and protected Core targets without changing either\nok 79 - all write operations reject symlinks and protected Core targets without changing either\n ---\n duration_ms: 67.487292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: CLI errors return nonzero JSON and source check is executable\nok 80 - CLI errors return nonzero JSON and source check is executable\n ---\n duration_ms: 118.464208\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsupported ATX spellings cannot silently hide unnumbered sections\nok 81 - unsupported ATX spellings cannot silently hide unnumbered sections\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.157417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: pending transaction detection uses the physical target across parent aliases\nok 82 - pending transaction detection uses the physical target across parent aliases\n ---\n duration_ms: 122.975583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: interrupted sources cannot enter export, init or another merge\nok 83 - interrupted sources cannot enter export, init or another merge\n ---\n duration_ms: 113.134666\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a sibling document cannot borrow the managed identity from an unrelated sidecar\nok 84 - a sibling document cannot borrow the managed identity from an unrelated sidecar\n ---\n duration_ms: 65.16825\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: input validation runs under the exclusive transaction before any document write\nok 85 - input validation runs under the exclusive transaction before any document write\n ---\n duration_ms: 68.580583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: version warnings respect the manifest range without becoming format judgments\nok 86 - version warnings respect the manifest range without becoming format judgments\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.174542\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: each reviewed input is bound, including source, current text, decisions and record\nok 87 - each reviewed input is bound, including source, current text, decisions and record\n ---\n duration_ms: 64.933041\n type: 'test'\n ...\n1..87\n# tests 87\n# suites 0\n# pass 86\n# fail 1\n# cancelled 0\n# skipped 0\n# todo 0\n# duration_ms 6218.574542\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-source-en.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-source-en.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9cade32 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-source-en.json @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "scripts/check.js", + "--source", + "OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"file\": \"/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"realPath\": \"/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"mode\": \"source\",\n \"sections\": 22,\n \"warnings\": []\n}\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/final-source-zh.json b/lean/validation/migration/final-source-zh.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4ab6d1d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/final-source-zh.json @@ -0,0 +1,13 @@ +{ + "command": [ + "rtk", + "proxy", + "node", + "scripts/check.js", + "--source", + "OrganonCore/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md" + ], + "returncode": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"file\": \"/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"realPath\": \"/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md\",\n \"mode\": \"source\",\n \"sections\": 22,\n \"warnings\": []\n}\n", + "stderr": "" +} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/node-tests-standalone.json b/lean/validation/migration/node-tests-standalone.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9bd49e9 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/node-tests-standalone.json @@ -0,0 +1,11 @@ +{ + "name": "node-tests", + "command": [ + "node", + "--test" + ], + "cwd": "", + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "TAP version 13\n# Subtest: comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\nok 1 - comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens\n ---\n duration_ms: 0.820292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 2 - provenance inside an ordinary block comment cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.882875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 3 - provenance inside nested block comments cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.588417\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\nok 4 - provenance inside a string with an escaped quote cannot annotate a real declaration\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.857541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\nok 5 - real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers\n ---\n duration_ms: 676.701584\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\nok 6 - real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained\n ---\n duration_ms: 664.606875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\nok 7 - real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants\n ---\n duration_ms: 655.959625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\nok 8 - partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them\n ---\n duration_ms: 657.769959\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\nok 9 - a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.971375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\nok 10 - real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate\n ---\n duration_ms: 568.921292\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\nok 11 - real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency\n ---\n duration_ms: 550.126416\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\nok 12 - real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies\n ---\n duration_ms: 558.175041\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\nok 13 - real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run\n ---\n duration_ms: 997.514042\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\nok 14 - source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant\n ---\n duration_ms: 10.320125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\nok 15 - missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 6.725542\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\nok 16 - unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.637458\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\nok 17 - preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed\n ---\n duration_ms: 8.47625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\nok 18 - four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.937459\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\nok 19 - reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.627625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 20 - snapshot tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.886334\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 21 - code tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.640125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 22 - review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.99275\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 23 - initial review tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.56625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\nok 24 - manuscript tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.59325\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\nok 25 - current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.909166\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 26 - missing review is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.221958\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 27 - review object is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.094583\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 28 - missing code blind record is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.701084\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 29 - changed fidelity is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.199125\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 30 - entry omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.815167\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 31 - declaration omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.520625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 32 - code omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.927334\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 33 - excerpt mismatch is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.158542\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 34 - false empty excerpt is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.336209\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 35 - language status disagreement is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.266041\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 36 - quote omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.153209\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 37 - code excerpt change is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.967083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 38 - line explanation omission is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.799083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 39 - line explanation empty is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 2.996334\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\nok 40 - invented failure is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.357541\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\nok 41 - unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.854708\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\nok 42 - countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 5.26\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\nok 43 - a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.437\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\nok 44 - kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.511375\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\nok 45 - absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.423917\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\nok 46 - ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths\n ---\n duration_ms: 7.767208\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\nok 47 - optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior\n ---\n duration_ms: 1355.445833\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\nok 48 - a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.485625\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public references cannot depend on a private local directory\nok 49 - public references cannot depend on a private local directory\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.400041\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\nok 50 - a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.35\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\nok 51 - current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale\n ---\n duration_ms: 4.423083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\nok 52 - public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.075875\n type: 'test'\n ...\n# Subtest: Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\nok 53 - Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package\n ---\n duration_ms: 125.045083\n type: 'test'\n ...\n1..53\n# tests 53\n# suites 0\n# pass 53\n# fail 0\n# cancelled 0\n# skipped 0\n# todo 0\n# duration_ms 5475.810084\n", + "stderr": "" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/parser-cli-parity.txt b/lean/validation/migration/parser-cli-parity.txt new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7e6446 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/parser-cli-parity.txt @@ -0,0 +1,55 @@ +{ + "parser_variants": 22, + "parser_parity": true, + "exports": { + "sections": [ + "ID", + "hash", + "parseDocument", + "withoutExtensions" + ], + "frontmatter": [ + "FORMAT_VERSION", + "HASH", + "SEMVER", + "normalize", + "parseFrontmatter", + "renderFrontmatter", + "validateMetadata" + ], + "checker": [ + "TOOLCHAIN", + "check", + "stripComments" + ], + "manuscript": [ + "checkManuscript" + ] + }, + "cli": [ + { + "project": "philosophy", + "manuscript": false, + "paths": 3, + "passed": true + }, + { + "project": "philosophy", + "manuscript": true, + "paths": 3, + "passed": true + }, + { + "project": "rationale", + "manuscript": false, + "paths": 3, + "passed": true + }, + { + "project": "rationale", + "manuscript": true, + "paths": 3, + "passed": true + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/philosophy-current-standalone.json b/lean/validation/migration/philosophy-current-standalone.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c23e640 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/philosophy-current-standalone.json @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +{ + "name": "philosophy-current", + "command": [ + "node", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js", + "lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy", + "--manuscript", + "manuscript.json" + ], + "cwd": "", + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"passed\": true,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"evidence\": \"/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/checks/2026-09-13T05-08-38.549Z-2749-ac11c4\",\n \"errors\": [],\n \"checked\": [\n \"CoreReader.Duties\",\n \"CoreReader.mixed_projection\",\n \"CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive\",\n \"CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture\",\n \"CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected\",\n \"CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected\",\n \"CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected\",\n \"CoreReader.Consistent\",\n \"CoreReader.joint_conflict\",\n \"CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set\",\n \"CoreReader.distinct_contexts\",\n \"CoreReader.ChangeReported\",\n \"CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report\",\n \"CoreReader.ObservationComplete\",\n \"CoreReader.observation_gap\",\n \"CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion\",\n \"CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion\",\n \"CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness\"\n ],\n \"dependencies\": {\n \"CoreReader.Duties\": [],\n \"CoreReader.mixed_projection\": [],\n \"CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive\": [],\n \"CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture\": [],\n \"CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected\": [],\n \"CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected\": [],\n \"CoreReader.Consistent\": [],\n \"CoreReader.joint_conflict\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"CoreReader.distinct_contexts\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"CoreReader.ChangeReported\": [],\n \"CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report\": [],\n \"CoreReader.ObservationComplete\": [],\n \"CoreReader.observation_gap\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness\": [\n \"propext\"\n ]\n },\n \"reported_reviews\": [],\n \"build_returncode\": 0,\n \"audit_returncode\": 0,\n \"manuscript\": {\n \"passed\": true,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"current_source\": \"current\",\n \"current_baseline\": \"current\",\n \"errors\": [],\n \"entries\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"c-10-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-10-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-12-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-12-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-12-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-12-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"organon.charter\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-22-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-22-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-24-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-24-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-29-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-29-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-34-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-34-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-34-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-39-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-39-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-39-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-39-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-44-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-44-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-44-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-46-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-46-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-47-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-48-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-48-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-49-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-49-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-54-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-59-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-59-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-59-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-59-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-61-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-61-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-61-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-66-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-66-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-67-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-67-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-72-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-77-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-77-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-77-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-82-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-82-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-82-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-83-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-83-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-84-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-89-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-89-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"rejected\",\n \"reported_status\": \"failed\",\n \"effective_status\": \"failed\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-94-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-94-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-94-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"rejected\",\n \"reported_status\": \"failed\",\n \"effective_status\": \"failed\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-94-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-94-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-94-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-98-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-98-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-98-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-99-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-99-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-99-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-100-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-100-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-100-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-102-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-102-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-102-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-102-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-107-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-107-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-107-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-109-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-109-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-109-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-109-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-111-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-111-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-116-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-116-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-116-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-118-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-118-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-118-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-118-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-118-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-123-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-123-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-125-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-125-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-125-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-130-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-131-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-131-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-132-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-132-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-133-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-133-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"organon.relationships\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-141-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-141-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-141-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-141-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-141-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-143-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-143-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-143-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-143-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-143-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-145-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-145-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-145-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-145-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-145-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-152-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-152-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-153-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-153-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"c-153-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n }\n ],\n \"manifest_sha256\": \"cf46c770e449675b6eb0fe65798bec9e84b916af2bcfab3ed22f89dd7ea733b4\"\n },\n \"kernel_passed\": true\n}\n", + "stderr": "" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/rationale-current-standalone.json b/lean/validation/migration/rationale-current-standalone.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c66688d --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/rationale-current-standalone.json @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +{ + "name": "rationale-current", + "command": [ + "node", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js", + "lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools", + "--manuscript", + "manuscript.json" + ], + "cwd": "", + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"passed\": true,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"evidence\": \"/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/checks/2026-09-13T05-08-38.548Z-2747-0b5853\",\n \"errors\": [],\n \"checked\": [\n \"RationaleReader.original_comparison\",\n \"RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample\",\n \"RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted\",\n \"RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained\",\n \"RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct\",\n \"RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth\",\n \"RationaleReader.encoded_statement\",\n \"RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted\",\n \"RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim\",\n \"RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case\"\n ],\n \"dependencies\": {\n \"RationaleReader.original_comparison\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.encoded_statement\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case\": []\n },\n \"reported_reviews\": [],\n \"build_returncode\": 0,\n \"audit_returncode\": 0,\n \"manuscript\": {\n \"passed\": true,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"current_source\": \"current\",\n \"current_baseline\": \"current\",\n \"errors\": [],\n \"entries\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-3-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-3-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-5-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-5-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-5-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-8\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-9\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-10\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-12-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-12-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-12-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-17\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-18\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-19\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-20\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-21\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-22-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-22-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-23\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-24\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-25\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-31\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-32-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-32-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-32-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-33\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-34\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-35\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-36-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-36-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-36-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-37\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-39\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-41\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-42\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-43\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-45\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-46\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-47\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c8\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-49\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-51\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-52\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-53\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-54\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-55\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-56-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-56-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-56-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-58-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-58-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-58-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-59-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-59-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-60-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-60-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-61\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-62-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-62-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-62-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-63\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-64\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-65\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-66-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-66-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-66-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-67\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-68\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-69\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-70-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-70-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-70-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-71-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-71-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-71-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-72-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-72-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-73-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-73-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-73-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-74-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-74-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-74-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-75-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-75-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-76-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-76-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-76-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-78-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-78-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-78-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-80-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-80-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-80-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-84-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-84-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-85-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-85-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-85-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-86-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-86-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-86-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-87-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-87-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-87-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-88-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-88-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-88-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-90-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-90-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-90-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-91\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-92\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-93\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-95\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-97\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-98-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-98-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-98-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-99\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-100\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-101\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-102-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-102-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-102-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-103\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-104\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-105\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-106\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-107\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-108-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-108-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c8\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-113\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-114\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-115\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-116\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-117\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-118-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-118-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"limited\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-123\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-124-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-124-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-124-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-125\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-126\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-127\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-128-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-128-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-129\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-130\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-131\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-v2-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-v2-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-v2-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-v2-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-v2-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-v2-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-v2-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-140\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-142\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"not_applicable\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"incomplete\"\n }\n ],\n \"manifest_sha256\": \"bab6d6e6981bca23633a05a1f2a054ea2fba545ea0a2dc9fa9a28747c3036c53\"\n },\n \"kernel_passed\": true\n}\n", + "stderr": "" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-base-standalone.json b/lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-base-standalone.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f573db6 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-base-standalone.json @@ -0,0 +1,12 @@ +{ + "name": "rationale-history-base", + "command": [ + "node", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js", + "lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale" + ], + "cwd": "", + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"passed\": true,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"evidence\": \"/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/checks/2026-09-13T05-08-38.548Z-2748-bcf72c\",\n \"errors\": [],\n \"checked\": [\n \"RationaleReader.original_comparison\",\n \"RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample\",\n \"RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted\",\n \"RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained\",\n \"RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct\",\n \"RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth\",\n \"RationaleReader.encoded_statement\",\n \"RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted\",\n \"RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim\",\n \"RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case\"\n ],\n \"dependencies\": {\n \"RationaleReader.original_comparison\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.encoded_statement\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case\": []\n },\n \"reported_reviews\": [],\n \"build_returncode\": 0,\n \"audit_returncode\": 0\n}\n", + "stderr": "" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-current-standalone.json b/lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-current-standalone.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..87d27a8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-current-standalone.json @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +{ + "name": "rationale-history-current", + "command": [ + "node", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js", + "lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale", + "--manuscript", + "manuscript.json" + ], + "cwd": "", + "exit_code": 1, + "stdout": "{\n \"passed\": false,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"evidence\": \"/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/checks/2026-09-13T05-08-38.549Z-2750-b096b4\",\n \"errors\": [],\n \"checked\": [\n \"RationaleReader.original_comparison\",\n \"RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample\",\n \"RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted\",\n \"RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained\",\n \"RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct\",\n \"RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth\",\n \"RationaleReader.encoded_statement\",\n \"RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted\",\n \"RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim\",\n \"RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case\"\n ],\n \"dependencies\": {\n \"RationaleReader.original_comparison\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.encoded_statement\": [],\n \"RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim\": [\n \"propext\"\n ],\n \"RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case\": []\n },\n \"reported_reviews\": [],\n \"build_returncode\": 0,\n \"audit_returncode\": 0,\n \"manuscript\": {\n \"passed\": false,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"current_source\": \"stale\",\n \"current_baseline\": \"current\",\n \"errors\": [\n \"Current source or adopted baseline drift: historical kernel evidence remains separate; current manuscript is stale\"\n ],\n \"entries\": [\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-3-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-3-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-5-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-5-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-5-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-8\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-9\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-10\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-11-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-12-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-12-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-12-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-13-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-14-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-15-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-16-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-17\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-18\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-19\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-20\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-21\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-22-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-22-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-23\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-24\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-25\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-26-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-27-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-28-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-29-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-30-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-31\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-32-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-32-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-32-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-33\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-34\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-35\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-36-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-36-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-36-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-37\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-38-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-39\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-40-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-41\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-42\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-43\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-44-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-45\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-46\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-47\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-48-c8\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-49\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-50-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-51\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-52\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-53\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-54\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-55\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-56-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-56-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-56-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-57-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-58-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-58-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-58-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-59-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-59-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-60-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-60-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-61\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-62-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-62-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-62-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-63\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-64\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-65\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-66-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-66-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-66-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-67\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-68\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-69\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-70-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-70-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-70-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-71-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-71-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-71-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-72-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-72-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-73-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-73-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-73-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-74-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-74-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-74-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-75-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-75-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-76-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-76-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-76-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-77-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-78-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-78-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-78-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-79-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-80-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-80-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-80-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-81-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-82-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-83-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-84-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-84-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-85-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-85-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-85-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-86-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-86-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-86-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-87-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-87-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-87-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-88-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-88-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-88-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-89-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-90-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-90-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-90-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-91\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-92\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-93\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-94-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-95\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-96-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-97\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-98-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-98-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-98-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-99\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-100\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-101\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-102-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-102-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-102-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-103\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-104\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-105\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-106\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-107\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-108-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-108-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-109-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-110-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-111-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-112-c8\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-113\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-114\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-115\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-116\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-117\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-118-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-118-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-119-c7\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-120-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"passed\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"partial\",\n \"reported_status\": \"limited\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-121-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-122-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-123\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-124-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-124-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-124-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-125\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-126\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-127\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-128-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-128-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-129\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-130\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-131\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-132-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-133-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-134-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-135-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-136-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-137-c6\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-138-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-139-c5\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-140\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-141-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-struct-142\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"reported_status\": \"not_applicable\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c1\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c2\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c3\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n },\n {\n \"id\": \"r-143-c4\",\n \"kernel\": \"not_checked\",\n \"reported_fidelity\": \"pending\",\n \"reported_status\": \"incomplete\",\n \"effective_status\": \"stale\"\n }\n ],\n \"manifest_sha256\": \"973288f219afd1356b518894640b5d9035fe669cb5889759471ede2d0a443464\"\n },\n \"kernel_passed\": true\n}\n", + "stderr": "" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/skill-actual-results.json b/lean/validation/migration/skill-actual-results.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b895ecf --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/skill-actual-results.json @@ -0,0 +1,67 @@ +[ + { + "name": "lean-only", + "command": [ + "", + "/independent-skill-cases/Identity.lean" + ], + "cwd": "/independent-skill-cases", + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "'retained' does not depend on any axioms\n", + "stderr": "" + }, + { + "name": "core-check", + "command": [ + "node", + "/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js", + "/independent-skill-cases" + ], + "cwd": "/independent-skill-cases", + "exit_code": 1, + "stdout": "{\n \"passed\": false,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"evidence\": \"/independent-skill-cases/evidence/checks/2026-09-13T05-04-53.629Z-2494-cead58\",\n \"errors\": [\n \"Missing declaration inventory\"\n ],\n \"checked\": [],\n \"dependencies\": {},\n \"reported_reviews\": []\n}\n", + "stderr": "" + }, + { + "name": "outer-check", + "command": [ + "node", + "/skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js", + "/independent-skill-cases" + ], + "cwd": "/independent-skill-cases", + "exit_code": 1, + "stdout": "{\n \"passed\": false,\n \"semantic_status\": \"not_evaluated\",\n \"evidence\": \"/independent-skill-cases/evidence/checks/2026-09-13T05-04-53.689Z-2495-1a8dab\",\n \"errors\": [\n \"Missing declaration inventory\"\n ],\n \"checked\": [],\n \"dependencies\": {},\n \"reported_reviews\": []\n}\n", + "stderr": "" + }, + { + "name": "outer-explicit-baseline", + "command": [ + "node", + "/scripts/resolve.js", + "--cwd", + "/independent-skill-cases", + "--philosophy", + "/independent-skill-cases/Selected.md" + ], + "cwd": "/independent-skill-cases", + "exit_code": 0, + "stdout": "{\n \"selectedPath\": \"/independent-skill-cases/Selected.md\",\n \"realPath\": \"/independent-skill-cases/Selected.md\",\n \"referenceDirectory\": \"/independent-skill-cases\",\n \"metadata\": {\n \"format_version\": \"0.1.0\",\n \"philosophy_version\": \"0.7.2\",\n \"core_version\": \"0.1.3\",\n \"derived_from\": null\n },\n \"warnings\": []\n}\n", + "stderr": "" + }, + { + "name": "outer-invalid-baseline", + "command": [ + "node", + "/scripts/resolve.js", + "--cwd", + "/independent-skill-cases", + "--philosophy", + "/independent-skill-cases/missing.md" + ], + "cwd": "/independent-skill-cases", + "exit_code": 1, + "stdout": "", + "stderr": "{\n \"error\": \"Philosophy not found: /independent-skill-cases/missing.md. Correct the explicit path; no Core fallback.\"\n}\n" + } +] diff --git a/lean/validation/migration/skill-responses.md b/lean/validation/migration/skill-responses.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cdb089b --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/migration/skill-responses.md @@ -0,0 +1,27 @@ +# Actual bounded skill responses + +These are actual applications by the independent reviewer of the newly read Core methods and outer forwarding instructions. They are not separate blind agents reviewing this reviewer's own newly written test encoding. No recursive reviewer was commissioned. The lack of fresh blind review remains visible; migration behavior can be checked without certifying a philosophical theorem. + +## Core and outer proof entrypoints — ordinary text + +Input has two exact lines: craft.1 “A workshop values preserving an existing craft.” and craft.2 “This commitment does not require every implementation to use its oldest tool.” The first is a contextual value claim; the second limits the required consequences of that commitment and is not simply a report that some tool is never used. Both depend on the same workshop/commitment context. Grounds supports assessing the stated value's reasons/limits, not proving it from tool output; implementation openness does not grant older or newer tools unconditional priority. + +Selected baseline is the explicitly supplied `Selected.md`, philosophy_version 0.7.2, retained as a downstream test baseline rather than replaced with Core. Core continues to govern the method. The input is a review object, not adopted philosophy. Both source lines are frozen with exact local spans and hashes. + +No source-fidelity judgment is accepted for the test interface. `Workshop.Commitment` stores an arbitrary proposition called `valuesPreservingCraft`; the field name alone does not encode or establish what the workshop values. It is only a proposed interface, not proof of satisfaction or philosophical content. The second clause remains unmodeled. Whole-source result is incomplete. The first no-declaration attempt is preserved and was mechanically rejected as `Missing declaration inventory`; the next version adds a definition solely to exercise the mechanical mapping/build/audit path. This later implementation detail does not retroactively change the original preregistered acceptance criterion or turn the source into a proved statement. + +Actual Core and outer checker invocations separately built and audited the same definition with no axiom dependencies, exit 0, semantic_status not_evaluated. This supports path/CLI parity and ordinary-text inventory usability, not a formalization achievement. + +## Core and outer natural-language entrypoints — Lean-only + +Input `Identity.lean`, line 1: `theorem retained (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h`. + +中文实际输出：任取命题 `P`，如果已经给出 `P` 的证明 `h`，则返回同一个 `h` 作为结论 `P` 的证明。`P : Prop` 声明任意命题；`h : P` 是显式前提；`: P` 是待返回的结论；`:= h` 直接使用已有证明。该声明没有独立建立 `P`，也没有证明任何未提供的自然语言主张。第二行 `#print axioms retained` 请求依赖审计，实际输出为 `retained` 不依赖任何公理。Lean 4.33.1 实际检查 exit 0。来源保真未评估，因为没有提供原文；代码解释不需要选择哲学基线。 + +Core direct invocation and outer forwarding preserve Chinese and --explain-lines scope: both yield this same single nonblank theorem-line explanation plus audit-line explanation. No installed translation CLI was invented. This is a standalone explanation, not a new blind semantic review of the maintained corpus. + +## Explicit-baseline variation + +Actual outer resolver returns Selected.md selectedPath/realPath/referenceDirectory and exact metadata 0.7.2. The direct Core method receives and retains this explicit choice. A nonexistent explicit missing.md returns exit 1 and “Correct the explicit path; no Core fallback.” The dependent philosophical operation remains incomplete; the source inventory above can still be retained. No baseline file was silently initialized or substituted. + +Limits: this test does not certify all current bilingual manuscripts or every runtime branch. The independent source-first initial judgments preceded author-candidate disclosure; this small new encoding did not receive another independent source/Lean-blind pair, so it is not labeled semantically reviewed. diff --git a/lean/validation/preexisting-management-failure.json b/lean/validation/preexisting-management-failure.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4b46ae8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/preexisting-management-failure.json @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +{ + "command": "rtk proxy node --test --test-name-pattern=source checks cover 22 tests/management.test.js", + "object": "unchanged task-start snapshot with original relative Core mirror", + "returncode": 1, + "stdout": "TAP version 13\n# Subtest: source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\nnot ok 1 - source checks cover 22 matching bilingual IDs; root mirror needs no lock\n ---\n duration_ms: 3.613458\n type: 'test'\n location: '[task-start baseline copy]/tests/management.test.js:45:1'\n failureType: 'testCodeFailure'\n error: |-\n Expected values to be strictly equal:\n + actual - expected\n \n + '41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1'\n - '2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57'\n \n code: 'ERR_ASSERTION'\n name: 'AssertionError'\n expected: '2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57'\n actual: '41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1'\n operator: 'strictEqual'\n stack: |-\n TestContext. ([task-start baseline copy]/tests/management.test.js:52:10)\n Test.runInAsyncScope (node:async_hooks:214:14)\n Test.run (node:internal/test_runner/test:1047:25)\n Test.start (node:internal/test_runner/test:944:17)\n startSubtestAfterBootstrap (node:internal/test_runner/harness:296:17)\n ...\n1..1\n# tests 1\n# suites 0\n# pass 0\n# fail 1\n# cancelled 0\n# skipped 0\n# todo 0\n# duration_ms 75.522375\n", + "stderr": "" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/relocated-philosophy.json b/lean/validation/relocated-philosophy.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4834475 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/relocated-philosophy.json @@ -0,0 +1,937 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "CoreReader.Duties", + "CoreReader.mixed_projection", + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", + "CoreReader.Consistent", + "CoreReader.joint_conflict", + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", + "CoreReader.ChangeReported", + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", + "CoreReader.observation_gap", + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" + ], + "dependencies": { + "CoreReader.Duties": [], + "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], + "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], + "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], + "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], + "CoreReader.Consistent": [], + "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], + "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], + "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], + "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ + "propext" + ] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "c-10-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-10-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-12-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-24-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-34-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-39-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-46-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-47-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-49-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-54-c1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-59-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-61-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-67-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-77-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-83-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-89-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "rejected", + "reported_status": "failed", + "effective_status": "failed" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "rejected", + "reported_status": "failed", + "effective_status": "failed" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-94-c6", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-99-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-100-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-102-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-107-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-116-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-118-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-123-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-125-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-130-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-131-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-133-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-141-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-143-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-145-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-152-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "c-153-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "80535ab7d351555636e11c5e2d76e21fe48d3a02f4cc5616e24c5823331abb0d" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "raw_summary_sha256": "a89f7da1e5a75184f413bba1068f59c48f1ee0bffc91178df9112b4d99c24b7b" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/relocated-rationale.json b/lean/validation/relocated-rationale.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..dcbf6b8 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/relocated-rationale.json @@ -0,0 +1,2647 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "RationaleReader.original_comparison", + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" + ], + "dependencies": { + "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], + "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], + "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], + "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], + "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], + "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], + "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ + "propext" + ], + "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "manuscript": { + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "current", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "r-struct-1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-3-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-5-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-9", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-10", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-11-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-12-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-13-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-14-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-15-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-16-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-17", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-18", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-19", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-20", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-21", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-22-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-23", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-24", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-25", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-26-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-27-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-28-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-29-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-30-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-31", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-32-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-33", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-34", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-35", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-36-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-37", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-38-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-39", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-40-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-41", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-42", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-43", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-44-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-45", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-46", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-47", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-48-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-49", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-50-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-51", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-52", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-53", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-54", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-55", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-56-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-57-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-58-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-59-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-60-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-61", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-62-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-63", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-64", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-65", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-66-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-67", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-68", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-69", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-70-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-71-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-72-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-73-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-74-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-75-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-76-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-77-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-78-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-79-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-80-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-81-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-82-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-83-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-84-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-85-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-86-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-87-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-88-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-89-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-90-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-91", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-92", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-93", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-94-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-95", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-96-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-97", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-98-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-99", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-100", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-101", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-102-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-103", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-104", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-105", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-106", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-107", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-108-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-109-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-110-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-111-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-112-c8", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-113", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-114", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-115", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-116", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-117", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-118-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c5", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-119-c7", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-120-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c4", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "r-121-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-122-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-123", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-124-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-125", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-126", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-127", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-128-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-129", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-130", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-131", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-132-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-133-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-134-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-135-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-136-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-137-c6", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-138-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-139-c5", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-140", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-141-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-struct-142", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c2", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c3", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "r-143-c4", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "pending", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "bce2fcebdfa3adb21aa636f59fbe69d5de1aa2162c09ad861922df2b9d49a7f4" + }, + "kernel_passed": true, + "raw_summary_sha256": "22f4a5a66f1d4619902878864513e36f616ec0e2abbea52a9b2b5a64e223c5d5" +} diff --git a/lean/validation/relocation.json b/lean/validation/relocation.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..bdb53ad --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/validation/relocation.json @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ +[ + { + "kind": "philosophy", + "summary": "relocated-philosophy.json", + "passed": true, + "kernel_passed": true, + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "checked_count": 18, + "manuscript_entries": 123, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated" + }, + { + "kind": "rationale", + "summary": "relocated-rationale.json", + "passed": true, + "kernel_passed": true, + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "checked_count": 10, + "manuscript_entries": 371, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated" + }, + { + "targeted_regression": "rtk proxy node --test --test-name-pattern=\"a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail\" tests/lean-manuscript.test.js", + "exit_code": 0, + "tests": 1, + "pass": 1, + "fail": 0, + "skipped": 0 + } +] diff --git a/package.json b/package.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9032f32 --- /dev/null +++ b/package.json @@ -0,0 +1,6 @@ +{ + "private": true, + "type": "module", + "engines": { "node": ">=22" }, + "scripts": { "test": "node --test" } +} diff --git a/scripts/lib/frontmatter.js b/scripts/lib/frontmatter.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e710af4 --- /dev/null +++ b/scripts/lib/frontmatter.js @@ -0,0 +1,82 @@ +export const FORMAT_VERSION = '0.1.0'; +export const SEMVER = /^(0|[1-9]\d*)\.(0|[1-9]\d*)\.(0|[1-9]\d*)$/; +export const HASH = /^[a-f0-9]{64}$/; + +export function normalize(text) { + return text.replace(/\r\n?/g, '\n'); +} + +function scalar(value) { + if (value.startsWith('"')) { + let parsed; + try { parsed = JSON.parse(value); } catch { throw new Error('Invalid quoted frontmatter scalar'); } + if (typeof parsed !== 'string') throw new Error('Expected a string scalar'); + return parsed; + } + if (SEMVER.test(value)) return value; + throw new Error('Unsupported frontmatter syntax: use X.Y.Z or a JSON double-quoted string'); +} + +export function validateMetadata(meta, supported = true) { + for (const key of ['format_version', 'philosophy_version', 'core_version']) { + if (!SEMVER.test(meta[key] ?? '')) throw new Error(`Invalid ${key}: expected X.Y.Z`); + } + if (supported && meta.format_version !== FORMAT_VERSION) { + throw new Error(`Unsupported format_version ${meta.format_version}; supported: ${FORMAT_VERSION}`); + } + if (meta.derived_from !== null) { + const source = meta.derived_from; + if (!source || Object.keys(source).sort().join(',') !== 'content_hash,philosophy_version,source_id' + || typeof source.source_id !== 'string' || !source.source_id.trim() + || !SEMVER.test(source.philosophy_version ?? '') || !HASH.test(source.content_hash ?? '')) { + throw new Error('Invalid derived_from: expected source_id, philosophy_version and content_hash'); + } + } + return meta; +} + +export function parseFrontmatter(raw, { supported = true } = {}) { + const text = normalize(raw); + if (!text.startsWith('---\n')) throw new Error('Missing philosophy frontmatter'); + const end = text.indexOf('\n---\n', 4); + if (end < 0) throw new Error('Unclosed philosophy frontmatter'); + const lines = text.slice(4, end).split('\n'); + const meta = {}; + for (let index = 0; index < lines.length; index++) { + const match = /^(format_version|philosophy_version|core_version|derived_from):(?: (.*))?$/.exec(lines[index]); + if (!match) throw new Error(`Unsupported frontmatter field or syntax: ${lines[index]}`); + const [, key, value] = match; + if (Object.hasOwn(meta, key)) throw new Error(`Duplicate frontmatter field: ${key}`); + if (key !== 'derived_from') { + if (!SEMVER.test(value ?? '')) throw new Error(`Invalid ${key}: use an unquoted X.Y.Z triple`); + meta[key] = value; + } else if (value === 'null') { + meta[key] = null; + } else if (value === undefined || value === '') { + const source = {}; + while (index + 1 < lines.length && lines[index + 1].startsWith(' ')) { + const child = /^ (source_id|philosophy_version|content_hash): (.+)$/.exec(lines[++index]); + if (!child || Object.hasOwn(source, child[1])) throw new Error('Unsupported or duplicate derived_from field'); + if (!child[2].startsWith('"')) throw new Error('derived_from values must be JSON double-quoted strings'); + source[child[1]] = scalar(child[2]); + } + meta[key] = source; + } else throw new Error('derived_from must be null or an indented source object'); + } + if (Object.keys(meta).length !== 4) throw new Error('Expected exactly four philosophy frontmatter fields'); + validateMetadata(meta, supported); + return { metadata: meta, body: text.slice(end + 5) }; +} + +export function renderFrontmatter(metadata, body) { + validateMetadata(metadata); + let header = ['---', ...['format_version', 'philosophy_version', 'core_version'].map(key => `${key}: ${metadata[key]}`)]; + if (metadata.derived_from === null) header.push('derived_from: null'); + else { + header.push('derived_from:'); + for (const key of ['source_id', 'philosophy_version', 'content_hash']) { + header.push(` ${key}: ${JSON.stringify(metadata.derived_from[key])}`); + } + } + return `${header.join('\n')}\n---\n${body}`; +} diff --git a/scripts/lib/sections.js b/scripts/lib/sections.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..59235a6 --- /dev/null +++ b/scripts/lib/sections.js @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +import { createHash } from 'node:crypto'; +import { normalize, parseFrontmatter } from './frontmatter.js'; + +export const ID = /^(?:extensions|[a-z][a-z0-9-]*(?:\.[a-z][a-z0-9-]*)+)$/; +export const hash = text => createHash('sha256').update(text).digest('hex'); + +export function parseDocument(raw) { + const { metadata, body } = parseFrontmatter(raw); + const lines = body.match(/[^\n]*\n|[^\n]+$/g) ?? []; + const heads = []; + let fence = null; + for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i++) { + const line = lines[i].replace(/\n$/, ''); + if (fence) { + if (new RegExp(`^ {0,3}${fence.char}{${fence.length},}\\s*$`).test(line)) fence = null; + continue; + } + const opening = /^ {0,3}(`{3,}|~{3,})(.*)$/.exec(line); + if (opening) { + if (opening[1][0] === '`' && opening[2].includes('`')) throw new Error('Backtick fence info must not contain backticks'); + fence = { char: opening[1][0], length: opening[1].length }; continue; + } + const heading = /^(#{1,6}) (.+)$/.exec(line); + if (heading) { + const marker = /^\n?$/.exec(lines[i + 1] ?? ''); + if (!marker || !ID.test(marker[1])) throw new Error(`Missing or invalid stable ID after heading: ${line}`); + heads.push({ start: i, id: marker[1], level: heading[1].length, title: heading[2] }); + i++; + } else if (/organon:id/.test(line) && /^\s* + +... exact source excerpt, visible status, boundaries, and reader explanation ... + +``` + +Each details view also contains the entire exact normalized content of every inventoried Lean file in this layout: + +````markdown + +```lean +... complete exact Lean source ... +``` + +```` + +For every nonempty code line, including imports and provenance comments, put one explanation on the same Markdown line as its marker: + +```markdown + Given arbitrary P and an assumed h : P, this declaration returns h; it does not establish P without h. +``` + +Line numbers are one-based in normalized source. English and Chinese details each need every nonempty line exactly once. An empty explanation fails; a nonempty but inaccurate or unhelpful explanation can still pass this mechanical check and must be rejected by reading review. Definitions, assumed conditions, and proved conclusions require distinct explanations. Do not replace explanations with declaration-name paraphrases. + +Run `node --test tests/lean-manuscript.test.js` for integrity/status fixtures, relocation, and real-kernel integration. Most integrity tests use a declared synthetic kernel result to isolate manuscript behavior; the integration test invokes the real pinned Lean gate. The existing Lean checker tests cover forbidden proof dependencies and omitted imports. Skipped real-toolchain tests are reported as unavailable, never counted as successful validation. + +## Current adopted baseline and clause scope + +When run.json binds an adopted baseline, include `baseline_current: {"path": "", "sha256": ""}`. Missing binding fails the public-manuscript check. Changing that current baseline makes the presentation stale even if its source text (for example, rationale) has not changed. The historical frozen-source kernel result remains separate. + +A fully reviewed and checked clause can be reported passed within a partially modeled source unit; this does not certify its unmodeled neighbors. Full source-unit completion cannot be inferred from one passed entry. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/references/run-format.md b/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/references/run-format.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..56ed077 --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/references/run-format.md @@ -0,0 +1,102 @@ +# Run format and mechanical gate + +Run `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js ` from the Core repository with Node 22 or newer. The checker uses only Node built-ins and the repository's existing document parser. Exit 0 means the recorded mechanical checks passed; exit 1 means failure, and exit 2 means invalid CLI usage. No exit status certifies the accuracy of the translation into Lean, philosophical correctness, sufficient grounds, or completion of review. + +Optional reader publication checks use `--manuscript `; see [bound reader manuscripts](manuscript-format.md) for the schema, source drift behavior, bilingual views, and reported-review boundary. The normal frozen-source gate remains independently available. + +## Bound inputs + +Place `run.json` in a new local run directory. Paths below are relative to that directory unless stated otherwise. Input files remain unchanged; each invocation builds a fresh copy under `evidence/checks/-/project`. Old build products are never reused. The checker does not modify an existing pilot or project configuration. + +```json +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "source": { + "kind": "text", + "path": "original.txt", + "snapshot": "baseline/source.txt", + "sha256": "<64 lowercase hexadecimal characters>", + "spans": [{ "id": "span.1", "start_line": 1, "end_line": 3 }] + }, + "project": { "path": "leanified", "root_module": "Example" }, + "preregistration": { "path": "PREREGISTERED.md", "sha256": "" }, + "units": [{ + "id": "span.1", + "hash": "", + "status": "partial", + "reason": "Only the stated implication is represented; its application remains under review.", + "clauses": [{ + "id": "identity", + "claim": "An assumed proposition entails itself.", + "declarations": ["Example.identity", "Example.caseIdentity"] + }] + }], + "declarations": [ + { + "name": "Example.identity", "kind": "theorem", "file": "Example/Model.lean", + "sources": [{ "unit": "span.1", "clause": "identity" }] + }, + { + "name": "Example.caseIdentity", "kind": "case", "file": "Example/Model.lean", + "sources": [{ "unit": "span.1", "clause": "identity" }] + } + ], + "cases": [{ + "id": "identity", "declaration": "Example.caseIdentity", + "kind": "positive", "expectation": "True has an explicit witness." + }] +} +``` + +The example's hash placeholders must be replaced with actual hashes. `source.path` identifies the original selected input and may be absolute or relative to the run directory. It must remain byte-identical to the frozen snapshot. `source.sha256` binds the snapshot's original bytes, without whitespace removal or newline conversion. Snapshot, project, preregistration, and review paths must remain within their respective directories; escaping symlinks are rejected. Project symlinks are unsupported. + +For an Organon input, set `source.kind` to `organon`, omit `spans`, and set `source.metadata` to the exact metadata returned by `scripts/lib/sections.js`'s `parseDocument`. This includes `format_version`, `philosophy_version`, `core_version`, and `derived_from`. Reuse the parser's section IDs and `hash` values. Every heading's direct body is a distinct unit, including parent sections and the preamble; only line endings are normalized. Whitespace remains significant. The existing format parser determines supported document formats; no particular philosophical version or unit count is frozen here. + +For plain text, use `source.kind: "text"`. Ordered inclusive, one-based line spans partition the complete normalized snapshot without gaps or overlaps. IDs are local to that frozen snapshot and may use ASCII letters, digits, dots, hyphens, and underscores, beginning with a letter or digit. The unit hash is SHA256 of the span's text after CRLF/CR normalization to LF, retaining every other character and each existing line ending. An empty source is unsupported. When text changes, create a new snapshot and reconsider its local spans rather than claiming that line positions are globally stable. + +An optional `baseline: {"path": "", "sha256": ""}` binds the adopted baseline separately from the raw input. Its path may be absolute or relative to the run directory. This identifies the review baseline; it does not make the input an adopted philosophy. + +## Coverage and declaration mapping + +List every source unit exactly once in `units`. Status is one of `formalized`, `partial`, `nonformal`, `excluded`, or `structural`. All except `formalized` require a nonempty reason. These statuses are reported assessments, not classifications established by the checker. `formalized` and `partial` require at least one clause; other statuses may have an empty clause list. Each clause requires a local ID, nonempty claim, and a list of unique declaration references. An unmodeled clause may use an empty list only with its own status (`nonformal`, `excluded`, or `unresolved`) and a nonempty reason. A `formalized` unit cannot contain an unmodeled clause; a `partial` unit needs at least one mapped clause. Use separate clauses where changes in meaning, assumptions, applicability, or losses need separate review. + +Every inventoried declaration requires a qualified Lean name, `kind` (`definition`, `theorem`, or `case`), a project-relative `file`, and one or more `{unit, clause}` references. Clause references and declaration source references must agree in both directions. Every case declaration must appear exactly once in `cases`, with its own unique case ID, nonempty kind, and expected result. An empty case inventory is mechanically allowed; the preregistered objectives and independent review determine whether cases are sufficient. No fixed countermodel count or quota is imposed. + +Attach this exact documentation comment immediately before each inventoried declaration, including cases: + +```lean +/-- organon-map Example.identity +span.1#identity sha256 +-/ +theorem Example.identity (p : Prop) (h : p) : p := h +``` + +Use one source line per `sources` entry in the same order. Lean accepts only one documentation comment attached to a declaration. If it already has one, preserve that explanation as an ordinary `/- ... -/` comment before the mapping comment; do not stack two `/-- ... -/` comments. The comment binds the declaration to each source unit's complete direct-body/span hash. Fully qualified declaration names or their final component inside a namespace are supported. Optional attributes and `noncomputable`/`protected` modifiers are supported. Managed names use ASCII letters, digits, underscores, apostrophes, and namespace dots. The bounded attachment check requires `theorem` for `theorem` and `case` entries; `definition` entries accept `def`, `abbrev`, `structure`, `inductive`, `class`, or `opaque`; use a supported declaration spelling instead of extending this check to arbitrary Lean syntax within a run. + +Helpers and Lean-generated fields or constructors need not be inventoried separately. Source-policy checks still cover every project `.lean` file. The checker detects a missing inventoried declaration, inconsistent mappings, changed attached unit hashes, and declarations unavailable through the root import. It cannot detect an intended claim omitted from both the preregistration and inventory, or establish that a correctly attached comment describes the declaration's meaning. Review must compare the complete source, clause inventory, actual Lean statements, assumptions, losses, and cases. + +## Core-only build and axiom audit + +Install `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1` separately before running this gate. The checker locates that existing installation under `${ELAN_HOME:-~/.elan}/toolchains/leanprover--lean4---v4.33.1`, checks its reported Lean version, and directly invokes its binaries. It does not invoke an elan shim or download a toolchain. Missing installation fails the gate. + +Use a generated data-only `lakefile.toml` with exactly this shape, optional version and defaultTargets lines, and no other keys or comments: + +```toml +name = "example" +version = "0.0.1" +defaultTargets = ["Example"] +[[lean_lib]] +name = "Example" +``` + +The library name must match the first component of the root module. When present, `defaultTargets` must contain only that same library name; including it is recommended so a manual `lake build` builds the library. The checker executes `lake build Example`, followed by `lake env lean --stdin` containing the root import and `#check`/`#print axioms` for every inventoried declaration. This explicit build target avoids relying on Lake's default target selection. Root source must exist; a declaration implemented in an unimported module fails the audit. `lean-toolchain` must contain the pinned toolchain. `lakefile.lean`, additional Lake TOML configuration, external dependencies, and a nonempty `lake-manifest.json` packages list are rejected before build. Existing projects outside this deliberately narrow format should be copied into a separate generated run project; the checker never rewrites their configuration. + +The axiom allowlist is `propext`, `Classical.choice`, and `Quot.sound`. Any other dependency, including `sorryAx` or a project axiom, fails. A separate conservative source policy rejects `sorry`, `admit`, `axiom`, `unsafe`, and `native_decide` in all project Lean sources after removing nested comments; quoted strings remain subject to this policy. For otherwise valid project inputs, source-policy findings do not skip compilation, so actual axiom evidence can still be retained. This is a local audit of trusted project sources, not a sandbox for hostile Lean metaprograms or a complete Lean-language security analyzer. + +## Evidence and review boundary + +Each invocation retains its manifest, input hashes, copied Lean project, generated audit program, timestamped command records, stdout/stderr logs, and `summary.json`. Earlier checks remain intact. Failures before compilation retain the available manifest and summary. The preregistration file is hash-bound; the checker cannot authenticate when it was written or whether it includes all intended requirements. + +Optional `reviews` entries contain `path`, `sha256`, and the author's `judgment` or other reported context. The checker verifies each report file's byte hash and copies its entry to `reported_reviews` with `applicability: "not_validated"`. Report authors should record the exact candidate input hashes they reviewed. A report hash alone does not establish that it applies to the current candidate; the initiating agent must compare those bindings after revisions and obtain the required review. The checker always reports `semantic_status: "not_evaluated"`; reported judgments never decide its mechanical pass/fail result, and no stale review is certified as applicable. + +Run `node --test tests/lean-checker.test.js` for disposable fixtures, including real Lean checks of valid runs, `sorryAx`, project axioms, and omitted root imports. Tests explicitly skip real Lean cases if the pinned installation is unavailable; a skipped test is not validation evidence for that behavior. diff --git a/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js b/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c21259e --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js @@ -0,0 +1,287 @@ +#!/usr/bin/env node +import fs from 'node:fs'; +import os from 'node:os'; +import path from 'node:path'; +import { spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; +import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url'; +import { isDeepStrictEqual } from 'node:util'; +import { hash, parseDocument } from '../../../scripts/lib/sections.js'; +import { HASH, normalize } from '../../../scripts/lib/frontmatter.js'; +import { checkManuscript } from './manuscript.js'; + +export const TOOLCHAIN = 'leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1'; +const NAME = /^[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_']*(?:\.[A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_']*)*$/; +const LOCAL_ID = /^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9_.-]*$/; +const ALLOWED_AXIOMS = new Set(['propext', 'Classical.choice', 'Quot.sound']); +const FORBIDDEN = /\b(?:sorry|admit|axiom|unsafe|native_decide)\b/g; +const assert = (condition, message) => { if (!condition) throw new Error(message); }; +const nonempty = value => typeof value === 'string' && value.trim().length > 0; +const escape = text => text.replace(/[.*+?^${}()|[\]\\]/g, '\\$&'); + +function localFile(base, relative) { + assert(nonempty(relative) && !path.isAbsolute(relative), 'Expected a relative run/project path'); + const resolved = path.resolve(base, relative); + assert(resolved.startsWith(`${path.resolve(base)}${path.sep}`), `Path escapes its directory: ${relative}`); + const real = fs.realpathSync(resolved); + assert(real.startsWith(`${fs.realpathSync(base)}${path.sep}`), `Symlink escapes its directory: ${relative}`); + return resolved; +} + +function boundFile(run, reference) { + assert(reference && HASH.test(reference.sha256 ?? ''), 'Missing bound file hash'); + const filename = localFile(run, reference.path); + assert(fs.statSync(filename).isFile(), `Not a file: ${reference.path}`); + assert(hash(fs.readFileSync(filename)) === reference.sha256, `Hash drift: ${reference.path}`); + return filename; +} + +// Comments are removed, strings deliberately retained for a conservative policy. +// Only code-level doc comments can attach provenance to a declaration. +function scanComments(source) { + let output = '', index = 0, depth = 0, quoted = false; + const docCommentStarts = new Set(); + while (index < source.length) { + const pair = source.slice(index, index + 2); + if (depth) { + if (pair === '/-') { depth++; output += ' '; index += 2; } + else if (pair === '-/') { depth--; output += ' '; index += 2; } + else { output += source[index] === '\n' ? '\n' : ' '; index++; } + } else if (quoted) { + output += source[index]; + if (source[index] === '\\' && index + 1 < source.length) output += source[++index]; + else if (source[index] === '"') quoted = false; + index++; + } else if (pair === '--') { + while (index < source.length && source[index] !== '\n') { output += ' '; index++; } + } else if (pair === '/-') { + if (source.startsWith('/--', index)) docCommentStarts.add(index); + depth = 1; output += ' '; index += 2; + } + else { quoted = source[index] === '"'; output += source[index++]; } + } + assert(depth === 0, 'Unclosed Lean block comment'); + return { code: output, docCommentStarts }; +} + +export function stripComments(source) { return scanComments(source).code; } + +function sourceUnits(run, source) { + assert(source && ['organon', 'text'].includes(source.kind), 'Unknown source kind'); + const snapshot = boundFile(run, { path: source.snapshot, sha256: source.sha256 }); + assert(nonempty(source.path), 'Missing original source path'); + const original = path.resolve(run, source.path); + assert(fs.readFileSync(original).equals(fs.readFileSync(snapshot)), 'Source drift: original differs from frozen snapshot'); + const raw = fs.readFileSync(snapshot, 'utf8'); + if (source.kind === 'organon') { + const parsed = parseDocument(raw); + assert(isDeepStrictEqual(source.metadata, parsed.metadata), 'Source metadata/version drift'); + return parsed.sections; + } + const lines = normalize(raw).match(/[^\n]*\n|[^\n]+$/g) ?? []; + assert(lines.length > 0 && Array.isArray(source.spans) && source.spans.length > 0, 'Text source requires nonempty frozen line spans'); + let next = 1; + const units = source.spans.map(span => { + assert(LOCAL_ID.test(span.id ?? '') && Number.isInteger(span.start_line) && Number.isInteger(span.end_line), 'Invalid text span'); + assert(span.start_line === next && span.end_line >= next && span.end_line <= lines.length, 'Text spans must partition every line, in order'); + next = span.end_line + 1; + return { id: span.id, hash: hash(lines.slice(span.start_line - 1, span.end_line).join('')) }; + }); + assert(next === lines.length + 1, 'Text spans omit trailing source lines'); + assert(new Set(units.map(unit => unit.id)).size === units.length, 'Duplicate source span ID'); + return units; +} + +function inventory(manifest, actual) { + assert(Array.isArray(manifest.units), 'Missing unit coverage inventory'); + const units = new Map(actual.map(unit => [unit.id, unit])); + assert(manifest.units.length === units.size && new Set(manifest.units.map(unit => unit.id)).size === units.size, 'Unit inventory must cover every source unit exactly once'); + const clauses = new Map(); + for (const unit of manifest.units) { + assert(units.get(unit.id)?.hash === unit.hash, `Unit hash drift or unknown ID: ${unit.id}`); + assert(['formalized', 'partial', 'nonformal', 'excluded', 'structural'].includes(unit.status), `Invalid coverage status: ${unit.id}`); + assert(unit.status === 'formalized' || nonempty(unit.reason), `Coverage reason required: ${unit.id}`); + assert(Array.isArray(unit.clauses), `Missing clause entries: ${unit.id}`); + assert(!['formalized', 'partial'].includes(unit.status) || unit.clauses.length > 0, `Formalized/partial unit needs clauses: ${unit.id}`); + for (const clause of unit.clauses) { + const key = `${unit.id}#${clause.id}`; + assert(LOCAL_ID.test(clause.id ?? '') && !clauses.has(key) && nonempty(clause.claim), `Invalid/duplicate clause: ${key}`); + assert(Array.isArray(clause.declarations) && new Set(clause.declarations).size === clause.declarations.length, `Clause needs unique declaration references: ${key}`); + if (clause.declarations.length === 0) { + assert(['nonformal', 'excluded', 'unresolved'].includes(clause.status) && nonempty(clause.reason), `Unmapped clause needs explicit status and reason: ${key}`); + assert(unit.status !== 'formalized', `Formalized unit contains an unmapped clause: ${key}`); + } + clauses.set(key, clause); + } + assert(unit.status !== 'partial' || unit.clauses.some(clause => clause.declarations.length > 0), `Partial unit needs a mapped clause: ${unit.id}`); + } + assert(Array.isArray(manifest.declarations) && manifest.declarations.length > 0, 'Missing declaration inventory'); + const declarations = new Map(); + for (const declaration of manifest.declarations) { + assert(NAME.test(declaration.name ?? '') && !declarations.has(declaration.name), `Invalid/duplicate declaration: ${declaration.name}`); + assert(['definition', 'theorem', 'case'].includes(declaration.kind), `Invalid declaration kind: ${declaration.name}`); + assert(Array.isArray(declaration.sources) && declaration.sources.length > 0, `Missing declaration mapping: ${declaration.name}`); + const keys = declaration.sources.map(source => `${source.unit}#${source.clause}`); + assert(new Set(keys).size === keys.length, `Duplicate source mapping: ${declaration.name}`); + for (const key of keys) assert(clauses.get(key)?.declarations.includes(declaration.name), `Missing reverse clause mapping: ${declaration.name} -> ${key}`); + declarations.set(declaration.name, declaration); + } + for (const [key, clause] of clauses) for (const name of clause.declarations) { + assert(declarations.get(name)?.sources.some(source => `${source.unit}#${source.clause}` === key), `Missing declaration mapping: ${key} -> ${name}`); + } + assert(Array.isArray(manifest.cases), 'Missing case inventory (an empty inventory is allowed)'); + const ids = new Set(), names = new Set(); + for (const entry of manifest.cases) { + assert(LOCAL_ID.test(entry.id ?? '') && !ids.has(entry.id) && !names.has(entry.declaration), 'Invalid or duplicate case'); + assert(declarations.get(entry.declaration)?.kind === 'case' && nonempty(entry.kind) && nonempty(entry.expectation), `Invalid case declaration or expectation: ${entry.id}`); + ids.add(entry.id); names.add(entry.declaration); + } + for (const declaration of declarations.values()) assert(declaration.kind !== 'case' || names.has(declaration.name), `Case declaration missing from inventory: ${declaration.name}`); + return { units, declarations }; +} + +function projectFiles(project, rootModule) { + assert(NAME.test(rootModule ?? ''), 'Invalid root module'); + assert(!fs.existsSync(path.join(project, 'lakefile.lean')), 'Core-only gate requires data-only lakefile.toml; lakefile.lean is unsupported'); + const config = fs.readFileSync(localFile(project, 'lakefile.toml'), 'utf8'); + // A deliberately narrow generated project format; no general TOML evaluation. + const pattern = /^\s*name = "([A-Za-z][A-Za-z0-9_-]*)"\s*\n(?:version = "[0-9]+\.[0-9]+\.[0-9]+"\s*\n)?(?:defaultTargets = \["([A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_']*)"\]\s*\n)?\[\[lean_lib\]\]\s*\nname = "([A-Za-z_][A-Za-z0-9_']*)"\s*$/; + const match = pattern.exec(normalize(config)); + assert(match && match[3] === rootModule.split('.')[0] && (!match[2] || match[2] === match[3]), 'Unsupported Lake TOML: use only name, optional version/defaultTargets, and one lean_lib name matching the root module prefix'); + assert(normalize(fs.readFileSync(localFile(project, 'lean-toolchain'), 'utf8')).trim() === TOOLCHAIN, `Expected pinned toolchain ${TOOLCHAIN}`); + if (fs.existsSync(path.join(project, 'lake-manifest.json'))) { + const lock = JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(localFile(project, 'lake-manifest.json'), 'utf8')); + assert(Array.isArray(lock.packages) && lock.packages.length === 0, 'Dependencies: lake-manifest must contain an empty packages array'); + } + const files = new Map(); + const visit = directory => { + for (const entry of fs.readdirSync(directory, { withFileTypes: true })) { + if (['.lake', '.git'].includes(entry.name)) continue; + const filename = path.join(directory, entry.name); + assert(!entry.isSymbolicLink(), `Project symlinks are unsupported: ${filename}`); + if (entry.isDirectory()) visit(filename); + else if (entry.name.endsWith('.lean')) files.set(path.relative(project, filename).split(path.sep).join('/'), fs.readFileSync(filename, 'utf8')); + } + }; + visit(project); + assert(files.has(`${rootModule.replaceAll('.', '/')}.lean`), 'Missing root module source'); + return { config, files }; +} + +export function check(runDirectory, options = {}) { + const run = fs.realpathSync(runDirectory); + const stamp = `${new Date().toISOString().replaceAll(':', '-')}-${process.pid}-${Math.random().toString(16).slice(2, 8)}`; + const evidence = path.join(run, 'evidence', 'checks', stamp); + fs.mkdirSync(evidence, { recursive: true }); + const result = { passed: false, semantic_status: 'not_evaluated', evidence, errors: [], checked: [], dependencies: {}, reported_reviews: [] }; + const record = (name, value) => fs.writeFileSync(path.join(evidence, name), `${JSON.stringify(value, null, 2)}\n`); + const execute = (label, binary, args, cwd, env, input) => { + const started_at = new Date().toISOString(); + const command = spawnSync(binary, args, { cwd, env, input, encoding: 'utf8', timeout: 240000, maxBuffer: 16 * 1024 * 1024 }); + const execution = { started_at, finished_at: new Date().toISOString(), command: [binary, ...args], cwd, status: command.status, error: command.error?.message ?? null, stdout: command.stdout ?? '', stderr: command.stderr ?? '' }; + record(`${label}.json`, execution); + fs.writeFileSync(path.join(evidence, `${label}.log`), execution.stdout + execution.stderr); + return execution; + }; + try { + assert(Number(process.versions.node.split('.')[0]) >= 22, 'Node 22 or newer is required'); + const manifestPath = localFile(run, 'run.json'); + const rawManifest = fs.readFileSync(manifestPath); + fs.writeFileSync(path.join(evidence, 'run.json'), rawManifest); + const manifest = JSON.parse(rawManifest); + assert(manifest.schema_version === 1, 'Unsupported run schema_version'); + boundFile(run, manifest.preregistration); + if (manifest.baseline) { + assert(nonempty(manifest.baseline.path) && HASH.test(manifest.baseline.sha256 ?? ''), 'Invalid selected baseline'); + assert(hash(fs.readFileSync(path.resolve(run, manifest.baseline.path))) === manifest.baseline.sha256, 'Selected baseline hash drift'); + } + const actual = sourceUnits(run, manifest.source); + const { units, declarations } = inventory(manifest, actual); + const project = localFile(run, manifest.project?.path); + const { config, files } = projectFiles(project, manifest.project.root_module); + const inputs = { 'run.json': hash(rawManifest), [manifest.preregistration.path]: manifest.preregistration.sha256, [manifest.source.snapshot]: manifest.source.sha256, [`${manifest.project.path}/lakefile.toml`]: hash(config) }; + const docCommentStartsByFile = new Map(); + for (const [file, raw] of files) { + inputs[`${manifest.project.path}/${file}`] = hash(raw); + const { code, docCommentStarts } = scanComments(normalize(raw)); + docCommentStartsByFile.set(file, docCommentStarts); + for (const token of code.matchAll(FORBIDDEN)) result.errors.push(`Source policy: ${file}:${code.slice(0, token.index).split('\n').length}: forbidden ${token[0]}`); + } + record('inputs-sha256.json', inputs); + for (const declaration of declarations.values()) { + assert(files.has(declaration.file), `Missing declaration source file: ${declaration.name}`); + const provenance = `/-- organon-map ${declaration.name}\n${declaration.sources.map(source => `${source.unit}#${source.clause} sha256 ${units.get(source.unit).hash}`).join('\n')}\n-/`; + const basename = declaration.name.split('.').at(-1); + const kinds = declaration.kind === 'definition' ? 'def|abbrev|structure|inductive|class|opaque' : 'theorem'; + const pattern = new RegExp(`${escape(provenance)}\\s*(?:@\\[[^\\]]*\\]\\s*)*(?:(?:noncomputable|protected)\\s+)*(?:${kinds})\\s+(?:${escape(declaration.name)}|${escape(basename)})(?=\\s|[:({])`, 'g'); + const attached = [...normalize(files.get(declaration.file)).matchAll(pattern)] + .filter(match => docCommentStartsByFile.get(declaration.file).has(match.index)); + assert(attached.length === 1, `Missing declaration or attached provenance: ${declaration.name}`); + } + if (manifest.reviews !== undefined) { + assert(Array.isArray(manifest.reviews), 'reviews must be an array'); + for (const review of manifest.reviews) { + boundFile(run, review); + result.reported_reviews.push({ ...review, applicability: 'not_validated' }); + } + } + const toolchainDirectory = path.join(process.env.ELAN_HOME ?? path.join(os.homedir(), '.elan'), 'toolchains', 'leanprover--lean4---v4.33.1'); + const bin = path.join(toolchainDirectory, 'bin'); + const lean = path.join(bin, 'lean'), lake = path.join(bin, 'lake'); + assert(fs.existsSync(lean) && fs.existsSync(lake), `Pinned toolchain is not installed at ${toolchainDirectory}; no download attempted`); + const env = { ...process.env, PATH: `${bin}${path.delimiter}${process.env.PATH ?? ''}`, ELAN_TOOLCHAIN: TOOLCHAIN }; + for (const key of ['LEAN_PATH', 'LEAN_SRC_PATH', 'LEAN_SYSROOT', 'LAKE_HOME']) delete env[key]; + const version = execute('lean-version', lean, ['--version'], run, env); + assert(version.status === 0 && /Lean \(version 4\.33\.1(?:[ ,)])/.test(version.stdout), 'Installed Lean version does not match 4.33.1'); + const working = path.join(evidence, 'project'); + fs.mkdirSync(working); + fs.writeFileSync(path.join(working, 'lakefile.toml'), config); + fs.writeFileSync(path.join(working, 'lean-toolchain'), `${TOOLCHAIN}\n`); + for (const [file, raw] of files) { + const destination = path.join(working, file); + fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(destination), { recursive: true }); + fs.writeFileSync(destination, raw); + } + const build = execute('lake-build', lake, ['build', manifest.project.root_module.split('.')[0]], working, env); + result.build_returncode = build.status; + if (build.status !== 0) result.errors.push('Build: lake build failed'); + const program = `import ${manifest.project.root_module}\n${[...declarations.keys()].map(name => `#check ${name}\n#print axioms ${name}`).join('\n')}\n`; + fs.writeFileSync(path.join(evidence, 'audit.lean'), program); + const audit = execute('lean-audit', lake, ['env', 'lean', '--stdin'], working, env, program); + result.audit_returncode = audit.status; + if (audit.status !== 0) result.errors.push('Audit: root import or declaration accessibility failed'); + for (const name of declarations.keys()) { + result.checked.push(name); + const pattern = new RegExp(`'${escape(name)}' (?:depends on axioms:\\s*\\[([^\\]]*)\\]|does not depend on any axioms)`, 'g'); + const matches = [...audit.stdout.matchAll(pattern)]; + if (matches.length !== 1) { result.errors.push(`Audit: expected one axiom report for ${name}`); continue; } + const axioms = (matches[0][1] ?? '').split(',').map(value => value.trim()).filter(Boolean); + result.dependencies[name] = axioms; + const forbidden = axioms.filter(axiom => !ALLOWED_AXIOMS.has(axiom)); + if (forbidden.length) result.errors.push(`Audit: forbidden dependencies for ${name}: ${forbidden.join(', ')}`); + } + result.passed = result.errors.length === 0; + } catch (error) { + result.errors.push(error.message); + } + if (options.manuscript !== undefined) { + const kernelPassed = result.passed; + result.manuscript = checkManuscript(run, options.manuscript, result); + result.kernel_passed = kernelPassed; + result.passed = kernelPassed && result.manuscript.passed; + record('manuscript.json', result.manuscript); + } + record('summary.json', result); + return result; +} + +export function runCli(usage = 'Usage: node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js [--manuscript ]') { + if (!(process.argv.length === 3 || (process.argv.length === 5 && process.argv[3] === '--manuscript'))) { console.error(usage); process.exitCode = 2; } + else { + try { const result = check(process.argv[2], process.argv.length === 5 ? { manuscript: process.argv[4] } : {}); console.log(JSON.stringify(result, null, 2)); process.exitCode = result.passed ? 0 : 1; } + catch (error) { console.error(error.message); process.exitCode = 1; } + } +} + +if (process.argv[1] && path.resolve(process.argv[1]) === fileURLToPath(import.meta.url)) { + runCli(); +} diff --git a/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js b/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6652faa --- /dev/null +++ b/skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js @@ -0,0 +1,168 @@ +import fs from 'node:fs'; +import path from 'node:path'; +import { isDeepStrictEqual } from 'node:util'; +import { hash, parseDocument } from '../../../scripts/lib/sections.js'; +import { normalize, HASH } from '../../../scripts/lib/frontmatter.js'; + +const assert = (condition, message) => { if (!condition) throw new Error(message); }; +const text = value => typeof value === 'string' && value.trim().length > 0; +const ID = /^[A-Za-z0-9][A-Za-z0-9_.-]*$/; +const inside = (base, file) => file === base || file.startsWith(`${base}${path.sep}`); +const sameSet = (a, b) => Array.isArray(a) && new Set(a).size === a.length && a.length === b.length && b.every(x => a.includes(x)); + +// This validates a trusted publication's bindings, not hostile filesystem access or Lean execution. +export function checkManuscript(runDirectory, manifestName, kernel) { + const result = { passed: false, semantic_status: 'not_evaluated', current_source: 'unchecked', current_baseline: 'not_selected', errors: [], entries: [] }; + try { + const run = fs.realpathSync(runDirectory); + assert(text(manifestName) && !path.isAbsolute(manifestName), 'Manuscript manifest path must be run-relative'); + const manifestPath = path.resolve(run, manifestName); + assert(inside(run, manifestPath) && inside(run, fs.realpathSync(manifestPath)), 'Manuscript manifest escapes run'); + const rawManifest = fs.readFileSync(manifestPath); + const m = JSON.parse(rawManifest); + result.manifest_sha256 = hash(rawManifest); + assert(m.schema_version === 1, 'Unsupported manuscript schema_version'); + assert(text(m.repository_root) && !path.isAbsolute(m.repository_root), 'repository_root must be relative'); + const root = path.resolve(run, m.repository_root); + const realRoot = fs.realpathSync(root); + assert(inside(root, run) && inside(realRoot, run), 'repository_root must contain run'); + const file = relative => { + assert(text(relative) && !path.isAbsolute(relative), 'Publication paths must be relative'); + const resolved = path.resolve(run, relative); + assert(!path.relative(root, resolved).split(path.sep).includes('.local') && !path.relative(realRoot, fs.realpathSync(resolved)).split(path.sep).includes('.local'), `Publication reference uses private .local data: ${relative}`); + assert(inside(root, resolved) && inside(realRoot, fs.realpathSync(resolved)), `Publication path escapes repository: ${relative}`); + assert(fs.statSync(resolved).isFile(), `Not a publication file: ${relative}`); + return resolved; + }; + const bound = reference => { + assert(reference && HASH.test(reference.sha256 ?? ''), 'Missing publication file hash'); + const filename = file(reference.path); + const raw = fs.readFileSync(filename); + assert(hash(raw) === reference.sha256, `Publication hash drift: ${reference.path}`); + return raw.toString('utf8'); + }; + const rawRun = fs.readFileSync(file('run.json')); + const r = JSON.parse(rawRun); + // Public evidence must be portable even though legacy run.json accepts absolute source/baseline paths. + for (const ref of [r.source?.path, r.source?.snapshot, r.baseline?.path, r.preregistration?.path, r.project?.path].filter(x => x !== undefined)) { + assert(text(ref) && !path.isAbsolute(ref), 'Public run paths must be relative'); + const resolved = path.resolve(run, ref); + assert(inside(root, resolved) && inside(realRoot, fs.realpathSync(resolved)), `Public run path escapes repository: ${ref}`); + assert(!path.relative(root, resolved).split(path.sep).includes('.local') && !path.relative(realRoot, fs.realpathSync(resolved)).split(path.sep).includes('.local'), `Public run uses private .local data: ${ref}`); + } + const source = bound({ path: r.source.snapshot, sha256: r.source.sha256 }); + assert(m.source_current?.sha256 === r.source.sha256, 'Current source expected hash must equal frozen source hash'); + const current = fs.readFileSync(file(m.source_current.path)); + let stale = hash(current) !== r.source.sha256; + result.current_source = stale ? 'stale' : 'current'; + if (r.baseline) { + assert(m.baseline_current?.sha256 === r.baseline.sha256, 'Missing or mismatched current baseline binding'); + const baselineNow = fs.readFileSync(file(m.baseline_current.path)); + result.current_baseline = hash(baselineNow) === r.baseline.sha256 ? 'current' : 'stale'; + stale ||= result.current_baseline === 'stale'; + } + let units; + if (r.source.kind === 'organon') units = new Map(parseDocument(source).sections.map(x => [x.id, x.body])); + else { + const lines = normalize(source).match(/[^\n]*\n|[^\n]+$/g) ?? []; + units = new Map(r.source.spans.map(x => [x.id, lines.slice(x.start_line - 1, x.end_line).join('')])); + } + const expected = new Map(); + for (const unit of r.units) { + if (unit.clauses.length) for (const clause of unit.clauses) expected.set(`${unit.id}#${clause.id}`, { unit, clause }); + else expected.set(`${unit.id}#`, { unit, clause: null }); + } + const project = path.resolve(run, r.project.path); + const expectedCode = []; + const visit = directory => { + for (const entry of fs.readdirSync(directory, { withFileTypes: true })) { + if (['.lake', '.git'].includes(entry.name)) continue; + const filename = path.join(directory, entry.name); + assert(!entry.isSymbolicLink(), 'Public Lean project must not contain symlinks'); + if (entry.isDirectory()) visit(filename); + else if (entry.name.endsWith('.lean')) expectedCode.push(path.relative(run, filename).split(path.sep).join('/')); + } + }; + visit(project); + assert(Array.isArray(m.code_files) && sameSet(m.code_files.map(x => x.path), expectedCode), 'Code file inventory must cover every project Lean file exactly once'); + const code = new Map(m.code_files.map(ref => [ref.path, bound(ref)])); + const codeHashes = Object.fromEntries(m.code_files.map(ref => [ref.path, ref.sha256])); + let review = null; + if (m.review) { + review = JSON.parse(bound(m.review)); + assert(review.schema_version === 1 && review.run_sha256 === hash(rawRun) && review.source_sha256 === r.source.sha256 && isDeepStrictEqual(review.code_sha256, codeHashes), 'Review object binding mismatch'); + assert(Array.isArray(review.entries) && new Set(review.entries.map(x => x.id)).size === review.entries.length, 'Invalid review entry inventory'); + assert(Array.isArray(review.initial_records), 'Missing review initial records'); + for (const initial of review.initial_records) bound(initial); + } + const keys = ['overview_en', 'details_en', 'overview_zh', 'details_zh']; + const views = Object.fromEntries(keys.map(key => [key, bound(m.views?.[key])])); + assert(new Set(keys.map(key => m.views[key].path)).size === 4, 'Four manuscript views require separate files'); + assert(Array.isArray(m.entries) && m.entries.length === expected.size, 'Manuscript must cover every source clause or unclausified unit'); + const ids = new Set(), covered = new Set(); + for (const entry of m.entries) { + assert(ID.test(entry.id ?? '') && !ids.has(entry.id), 'Invalid or duplicate manuscript entry ID'); + ids.add(entry.id); + const key = `${entry.unit}#${entry.clause ?? ''}`; + assert(expected.has(key) && !covered.has(key), `Invalid or duplicate manuscript source: ${key}`); + covered.add(key); + const { unit, clause } = expected.get(key); + assert(typeof entry.excerpt === 'string' && units.get(entry.unit)?.includes(entry.excerpt), `Source excerpt mismatch: ${entry.id}`); + assert(entry.excerpt.trim() || !units.get(entry.unit)?.trim(), `Empty excerpt for substantive source: ${entry.id}`); + assert(sameSet(entry.declarations, clause?.declarations ?? []), `Manuscript declaration mapping mismatch: ${entry.id}`); + assert(text(entry.reason), `Missing boundary/reason: ${entry.id}`); + assert(['passed', 'failed', 'not_checked'].includes(entry.kernel), 'Invalid kernel status'); + assert(['full', 'partial', 'rejected', 'pending', 'not_applicable'].includes(entry.fidelity), 'Invalid fidelity status'); + assert(['passed', 'limited', 'failed', 'incomplete', 'not_applicable', 'stale'].includes(entry.status), 'Invalid aggregate status'); + const reported = review?.entries.find(x => x.id === entry.id); + if (reported) assert(reported.fidelity === entry.fidelity && text(reported.reason), `Review judgment mismatch: ${entry.id}`); + if (['full', 'partial', 'rejected'].includes(entry.fidelity)) assert(reported, `Missing reported fidelity review: ${entry.id}`); + if (entry.kernel === 'passed') assert(kernel.passed && entry.declarations.length > 0 && entry.declarations.every(name => kernel.checked.includes(name)), `Kernel cannot support passed entry: ${entry.id}`); + if (entry.kernel === 'failed') assert(!kernel.passed && entry.declarations.length > 0, `No failed kernel run for entry: ${entry.id}`); + if (['passed', 'limited'].includes(entry.status)) { + assert(entry.declarations.some(name => r.declarations.some(d => d.name === name && ['theorem', 'case'].includes(d.kind))), `Approval needs a proved declaration, not only definitions: ${entry.id}`); + assert(entry.kernel === 'passed' && reported && ['full', 'partial'].includes(entry.fidelity), `Approval lacks kernel or review: ${entry.id}`); + assert(review.initial_records.some(x => x.role === 'source_initial') && review.initial_records.some(x => x.role === 'code_blind'), `Approval lacks initial source review or code blind record: ${entry.id}`); + assert(entry.status !== 'passed' || (entry.fidelity === 'full' && clause !== null), `Full approval exceeds the named clause coverage: ${entry.id}`); + } + if (entry.status === 'failed') assert(entry.kernel === 'failed' || entry.fidelity === 'rejected' || (entry.countermodel?.target === 'refuted' && entry.countermodel?.source_relation === 'refutes_source'), `Failure needs a recorded cause: ${entry.id}`); + if (entry.status === 'not_applicable') assert(entry.fidelity === 'not_applicable' && entry.declarations.length === 0, `Inapplicable entry contains a formal claim: ${entry.id}`); + if (entry.countermodel != null) { + assert(entry.declarations.includes(entry.countermodel.declaration) && entry.countermodel.verification === 'passed' && entry.kernel === 'passed' && entry.countermodel.target === 'refuted' && text(entry.countermodel.reason), `Countermodel must separate verified example and refuted target: ${entry.id}`); + assert(['supports_nonentailment', 'refutes_source'].includes(entry.countermodel.source_relation), `Countermodel needs its relation to the source claim: ${entry.id}`); + if (entry.countermodel.source_relation === 'refutes_source') assert(entry.status === 'failed', `Refuted source claim cannot be reported as passed: ${entry.id}`); + } + if (entry.status === 'stale') assert(stale, `Stale status without current source drift: ${entry.id}`); + for (const [name, content] of Object.entries(views)) { + const start = ``, end = ``; + assert(content.split(start).length === 2 && content.split(end).length === 2, `Missing or duplicate entry in ${name}: ${entry.id}`); + const a = content.indexOf(start) + start.length, b = content.indexOf(end); + assert(b >= a, `Reversed manuscript section: ${entry.id}`); + const section = content.slice(a, b); + assert(section.split('`), `Manuscript status mismatch in ${name}: ${entry.id}`); + assert(section.includes(entry.excerpt), `Manuscript source quotation mismatch in ${name}: ${entry.id}`); + } + result.entries.push({ id: entry.id, kernel: entry.kernel, reported_fidelity: entry.fidelity, reported_status: entry.status, effective_status: stale ? 'stale' : entry.status }); + } + if (review) assert(review.entries.every(x => ids.has(x.id)), 'Review contains unknown manuscript entries'); + for (const key of keys) { + const actual = [...views[key].matchAll(//g)].map(x => x[1]); + assert(sameSet(actual, [...ids]), `Unknown or missing manuscript entries in ${key}`); + } + for (const key of ['details_en', 'details_zh']) for (const [filename, raw] of code) { + const normalized = normalize(raw); + const block = `\n\`\`\`lean\n${normalized}${normalized.endsWith('\n') ? '' : '\n'}\`\`\`\n`; + assert(views[key].includes(block), `Missing exact Lean code block in ${key}: ${filename}`); + const lines = normalized.split('\n'); + for (let i = 0; i < lines.length; i++) if (lines[i].trim()) { + const marker = ``; + assert(views[key].split(marker).length === 2, `Missing or duplicate line explanation in ${key}: ${filename}:${i + 1}`); + const explanation = views[key].split(marker)[1].split('\n')[0].trim(); + assert(text(explanation) && !explanation.startsWith('\n\nParent direct body. \n\n## Claim\n\n\nA stated premise supports the same premise.\n'; + write('source.txt', raw); write('snapshot.txt', raw); write('preregister.md', 'Before implementation: test identity and rejection of an unsupported implication.\n'); + const parsed = kind === 'organon' ? parseDocument(raw) : null; + const sourceUnits = parsed?.sections ?? [{ id: 'span.1', hash: hash(raw) }]; + const mapped = sourceUnits.at(-1); + const sources = [{ unit: mapped.id, clause: 'identity' }]; + const annotation = name => `/-- organon-map ${name}\n${mapped.id}#identity sha256 ${mapped.hash}\n-/\n`; + const model = `${annotation('Fixture.identity')}theorem Fixture.identity (p : Prop) (h : p) : p := h\n${annotation('Fixture.caseIdentity')}theorem Fixture.caseIdentity : True := True.intro\n`; + write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', model); + write('lean/Fixture.lean', 'import Fixture.Model\n'); + write('lean/lakefile.toml', 'name = "fixture"\nversion = "0.0.1"\ndefaultTargets = ["Fixture"]\n[[lean_lib]]\nname = "Fixture"\n'); + write('lean/lean-toolchain', `${TOOLCHAIN}\n`); + const manifest = { + schema_version: 1, + source: { kind, path: 'source.txt', snapshot: 'snapshot.txt', sha256: hash(raw), ...(parsed ? { metadata: parsed.metadata } : { spans: [{ id: mapped.id, start_line: 1, end_line: 1 }] }) }, + project: { path: 'lean', root_module: 'Fixture' }, + preregistration: { path: 'preregister.md', sha256: hash(fs.readFileSync(path.join(directory, 'preregister.md'))) }, + units: sourceUnits.map(unit => ({ id: unit.id, hash: unit.hash, status: unit.id === mapped.id ? 'formalized' : 'nonformal', reason: 'Context is retained without a formal claim.', clauses: unit.id === mapped.id ? [{ id: 'identity', claim: 'An assumed proposition entails itself.', declarations: ['Fixture.identity', 'Fixture.caseIdentity'] }] : [] })), + declarations: [{ name: 'Fixture.identity', kind: 'theorem', file: 'Fixture/Model.lean', sources }, { name: 'Fixture.caseIdentity', kind: 'case', file: 'Fixture/Model.lean', sources }], + cases: [{ id: 'identity', declaration: 'Fixture.caseIdentity', kind: 'positive', expectation: 'True has an explicit witness.' }], + }; + const save = () => write('run.json', `${JSON.stringify(manifest, null, 2)}\n`); + save(); + return { directory, manifest, write, save, model, annotation, mapped }; +} + +test('comment policy handles nested comments and retains quoted tokens', () => { + assert.equal(stripComments('/- sorry /- axiom -/ -/\ntheorem x : True := by trivial').includes('sorry'), false); + assert.match(stripComments('def x := "sorry"'), /sorry/); + assert.throws(() => stripComments('/-'), /Unclosed/); +}); + +for (const [label, wrap] of [ + ['an ordinary block comment', example => `/- Example only:\n${example}-/\n`], + ['nested block comments', example => `/- Outer /- Inner:\n${example}-/ -/\n`], + ['a string with an escaped quote', example => String.raw`def Fixture.example : String := "quoted \" example` + `\n${example}"\n`], +]) { + test(`provenance inside ${label} cannot annotate a real declaration`, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + const annotation = f.annotation('Fixture.identity'); + const example = `${annotation}theorem Fixture.identity (p : Prop) (h : p) : p := h\n`; + f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', wrap(example) + f.model.replace(annotation, '')); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false, JSON.stringify(result)); + assert.match(result.errors.join('\n'), /Missing declaration or attached provenance: Fixture.identity/); + assert.equal(fs.existsSync(path.join(result.evidence, 'lake-build.json')), false); + }); +} + +test('real provenance remains valid after comments and quoted comment markers', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + const prefix = '/- Outer /- nested -/ -/\n-- /-- ignored line comment\n' + + String.raw`def Fixture.example : String := "/- /-- markers -/ and \"quotation\""` + '\n'; + f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', prefix + f.model); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, true, JSON.stringify(result)); +}); + +test('real Lean accepts frozen plain text; outputs and input config are retained', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + const before = fs.readFileSync(path.join(f.directory, 'lean/lakefile.toml')); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, true, JSON.stringify(result)); + assert.equal(result.semantic_status, 'not_evaluated'); + assert.deepEqual(result.checked, ['Fixture.identity', 'Fixture.caseIdentity']); + assert.deepEqual(result.dependencies['Fixture.identity'], []); + assert.equal(result.build_returncode, 0); + assert.equal(result.audit_returncode, 0); + assert.deepEqual(fs.readFileSync(path.join(f.directory, 'lean/lakefile.toml')), before); + assert.equal(fs.existsSync(path.join(f.directory, 'lean/.lake')), false); + assert.match(fs.readFileSync(path.join(result.evidence, 'lean-audit.log'), 'utf8'), /Fixture.identity/); + assert.ok(JSON.parse(fs.readFileSync(path.join(result.evidence, 'lake-build.json'))).started_at); +}); + +test('real Lean accepts Organon versions and full parent direct-body coverage without pilot constants', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t, 'organon'); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, true, JSON.stringify(result)); +}); + +test('partial coverage retains explicitly unmodeled clauses while formalized coverage rejects them', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.manifest.units[0].status = 'partial'; + f.manifest.units[0].clauses.push({ id: 'value', claim: 'The source values this form of support.', declarations: [], status: 'nonformal', reason: 'The value is retained for review, without an encoding.' }); + f.save(); + assert.equal(check(f.directory).passed, true); + f.manifest.units[0].status = 'formalized'; + f.save(); + assert.match(check(f.directory).errors.join('\n'), /Formalized unit contains an unmapped clause/); + f.manifest.units[0].status = 'partial'; + delete f.manifest.units[0].clauses[1].reason; + f.save(); + assert.match(check(f.directory).errors.join('\n'), /Unmapped clause needs explicit status and reason/); +}); + +test('a definition of a proposition cannot masquerade as a theorem or case', t => { + for (const name of ['Fixture.identity', 'Fixture.caseIdentity']) { + const f = fixture(t); + f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', f.model.replace(`theorem ${name}`, `def ${name}`)); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false); + assert.match(result.errors.join('\n'), /Missing declaration or attached provenance/); + } +}); + +test('real Lean allows standard axioms and keeps reported semantic judgments separate', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', f.model.replace('(p : Prop) (h : p) : p := h', '(p : Prop) : p ∨ ¬p := Classical.em p')); + f.write('review.md', 'The current mapping requires semantic revision.\n'); + f.manifest.reviews = [{ path: 'review.md', sha256: hash(fs.readFileSync(path.join(f.directory, 'review.md'))), judgment: 'rejected', candidate_sha256: '0'.repeat(64) }]; + f.save(); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, true, JSON.stringify(result)); + assert.ok(result.dependencies['Fixture.identity'].includes('Classical.choice')); + assert.equal(result.semantic_status, 'not_evaluated'); + assert.equal(result.reported_reviews[0].judgment, 'rejected'); + assert.equal(result.reported_reviews[0].applicability, 'not_validated'); +}); + +test('real Lean rejects sorry through source policy and actual sorryAx dependency', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', f.model.replace(': p := h', ': p := by sorry')); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false); + assert.equal(result.build_returncode, 0, JSON.stringify(result)); + assert.ok(result.errors.some(error => error.includes('forbidden sorry'))); + assert.deepEqual(result.dependencies['Fixture.identity'], ['sorryAx']); +}); + +test('real Lean rejects a project axiom through source policy and actual dependencies', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', `axiom Fixture.extra : True\n${f.model.replace('True.intro', 'Fixture.extra')}`); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false); + assert.equal(result.build_returncode, 0, JSON.stringify(result)); + assert.ok(result.errors.some(error => error.includes('forbidden axiom'))); + assert.deepEqual(result.dependencies['Fixture.caseIdentity'], ['Fixture.extra']); +}); + +test('real Lean root-import omission fails even after a successful prior run', realLean, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + assert.equal(check(f.directory).passed, true); + f.write('lean/Fixture.lean', '-- omitted import\n'); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false); + assert.notEqual(result.audit_returncode, 0); + assert.ok(result.errors.some(error => error.includes('root import'))); +}); + +test('source and snapshot mutations fail before Lean; whitespace and coverage stay significant', t => { + for (const kind of ['source', 'snapshot', 'unit', 'coverage', 'metadata']) { + const f = fixture(t, 'organon'); + if (kind === 'source') f.write('source.txt', fs.readFileSync(path.join(f.directory, 'source.txt'), 'utf8') + ' '); + if (kind === 'snapshot') f.write('snapshot.txt', fs.readFileSync(path.join(f.directory, 'snapshot.txt'), 'utf8') + ' '); + if (kind === 'unit') f.manifest.units[0].hash = hash('Parent direct body.'); + if (kind === 'coverage') f.manifest.units.shift(); + if (kind === 'metadata') f.manifest.source.metadata.philosophy_version = '9.9.9'; + f.save(); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false, kind); + assert.match(result.errors.join('\n'), /drift|inventory/, kind); + } +}); + +test('missing declaration, missing inventory mapping and altered provenance fail', t => { + for (const kind of ['source', 'inventory', 'provenance']) { + const f = fixture(t); + if (kind === 'source') f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', f.model.replace('theorem Fixture.identity ', 'theorem Fixture.removed ')); + if (kind === 'inventory') { f.manifest.declarations.shift(); f.save(); } + if (kind === 'provenance') f.write('lean/Fixture/Model.lean', f.model.replace(f.mapped.hash, '0'.repeat(64))); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false, kind); + assert.match(result.errors.join('\n'), /declaration|provenance/, kind); + } +}); + +test('unsafe Lake configuration and dependency locks fail without executing them', t => { + for (const kind of ['lean', 'toml', 'lock']) { + const f = fixture(t); + if (kind === 'lean') f.write('lean/lakefile.lean', '#eval IO.println "must not run"\n'); + if (kind === 'toml') f.write('lean/lakefile.toml', 'name = "fixture"\n[[require]]\nname = "mathlib"\n'); + if (kind === 'lock') f.write('lean/lake-manifest.json', '{"packages":[{"name":"mathlib"}]}'); + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false, kind); + assert.equal(fs.existsSync(path.join(result.evidence, 'lake-build.json')), false); + assert.match(result.errors.join('\n'), /Lake|lakefile|Dependencies/, kind); + } +}); + +test('preregistration binding, text spans, cases and missing toolchain fail closed', t => { + for (const kind of ['preregister', 'spans', 'case', 'toolchain']) { + const f = fixture(t); + if (kind === 'preregister') f.write('preregister.md', 'rewritten after implementation'); + if (kind === 'spans') f.manifest.source.spans[0].start_line = 2; + if (kind === 'case') f.manifest.cases = []; + f.save(); + const prior = process.env.ELAN_HOME; + if (kind === 'toolchain') process.env.ELAN_HOME = path.join(f.directory, 'not-installed'); + try { + const result = check(f.directory); + assert.equal(result.passed, false, kind); + assert.equal(fs.existsSync(path.join(result.evidence, 'lake-build.json')), false); + if (kind === 'toolchain') assert.match(result.errors.join('\n'), /no download attempted/); + } finally { if (prior === undefined) delete process.env.ELAN_HOME; else process.env.ELAN_HOME = prior; } + } +}); diff --git a/tests/lean-manuscript.test.js b/tests/lean-manuscript.test.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..80025d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/lean-manuscript.test.js @@ -0,0 +1,226 @@ +import test from 'node:test'; +import assert from 'node:assert/strict'; +import fs from 'node:fs'; +import os from 'node:os'; +import path from 'node:path'; +import { checkManuscript } from '../skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js'; +import { check, TOOLCHAIN } from '../skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js'; +import { hash } from '../scripts/lib/sections.js'; + +function fixture(t) { + const root = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'organon-manuscript-')); + const run = path.join(root, 'package'); + const write = (name, data) => { const p = path.resolve(run, name); fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(p), { recursive: true }); fs.writeFileSync(p, data); }; + t.after(() => { + if (process.env.ORGANON_LEAN_TEST_EVIDENCE_DIR) fs.cpSync(root, path.join(process.env.ORGANON_LEAN_TEST_EVIDENCE_DIR, path.basename(root)), { recursive: true }); + fs.rmSync(root, { recursive: true, force: true }); + }); + const source = 'An assumed proposition follows from itself.\n'; + const unitHash = hash(source); + const model = `/-- organon-map Fixture.identity\nspan.1#identity sha256 ${unitHash}\n-/\ntheorem Fixture.identity (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h\n`; + write('snapshot.txt', source); write('../current.txt', source); write('source.txt', source); + write('project/Fixture.lean', model); + write('project/lakefile.toml', 'name = "fixture"\n[[lean_lib]]\nname = "Fixture"\n'); + write('project/lean-toolchain', `${TOOLCHAIN}\n`); + write('preregister.md', 'Test identity with explicit assumption.\n'); + const r = { schema_version: 1, source: { kind: 'text', path: 'source.txt', snapshot: 'snapshot.txt', sha256: hash(source), spans: [{ id: 'span.1', start_line: 1, end_line: 1 }] }, + preregistration: { path: 'preregister.md', sha256: hash('Test identity with explicit assumption.\n') }, + project: { path: 'project', root_module: 'Fixture' }, + units: [{ id: 'span.1', hash: unitHash, status: 'partial', reason: 'Only a formal identity is modeled.', clauses: [{ id: 'identity', claim: source.trim(), declarations: ['Fixture.identity'] }] }], + declarations: [{ name: 'Fixture.identity', kind: 'theorem', file: 'Fixture.lean', sources: [{ unit: 'span.1', clause: 'identity' }] }], cases: [] }; + write('run.json', JSON.stringify(r)); + write('source-initial.md', 'Initial source assessment: an explicit premise is retained.\n'); + write('code-blind.md', 'Given arbitrary P and assumed h : P, identity returns h.\n'); + const review = { schema_version: 1, run_sha256: hash(JSON.stringify(r)), source_sha256: hash(source), code_sha256: { 'project/Fixture.lean': hash(model) }, + initial_records: [{ role: 'source_initial', path: 'source-initial.md', sha256: hash(fs.readFileSync(path.join(run, 'source-initial.md'))) }, { role: 'code_blind', path: 'code-blind.md', sha256: hash(fs.readFileSync(path.join(run, 'code-blind.md'))) }], + entries: [{ id: 'claim.1', fidelity: 'partial', reason: 'Reported limited relation only.' }] }; + const m = { schema_version: 1, repository_root: '..', source_current: { path: '../current.txt', sha256: hash(source) }, + code_files: [{ path: 'project/Fixture.lean', sha256: hash(model) }], review: { path: 'review.json', sha256: '' }, views: {}, + entries: [{ id: 'claim.1', unit: 'span.1', clause: 'identity', excerpt: source, declarations: ['Fixture.identity'], kernel: 'passed', fidelity: 'partial', status: 'limited', reason: 'Limited to explicit premise.' }] }; + const views = {}; + const makeViews = () => { + for (const key of ['overview_en', 'details_en', 'overview_zh', 'details_zh']) { + views[key] = m.entries.map(e => `\n\n${e.excerpt}\n${e.reason}\n\n`).join('\n'); + if (key.startsWith('details')) { + views[key] += `\n\n\`\`\`lean\n${model}\`\`\`\n\n`; + views[key] += model.split('\n').map((line, i) => line.trim() ? ` ${i < 3 ? 'Provenance comment; not a logical premise.' : 'For arbitrary P and h : P, return h. This assumes P.'}\n` : '').join(''); + } + } + }; + makeViews(); + const save = () => { + write('review.json', JSON.stringify(review)); + if (m.review) m.review.sha256 = hash(JSON.stringify(review)); + for (const [key, data] of Object.entries(views)) { write(`../${key}.md`, data); m.views[key] = { path: `../${key}.md`, sha256: hash(data) }; } + write('manuscript.json', JSON.stringify(m)); + }; + save(); + const kernel = { passed: true, checked: ['Fixture.identity'] }; + return { root, run, write, source, model, r, m, review, views, save, makeViews, kernel, check: () => checkManuscript(run, 'manuscript.json', kernel) }; +} + +test('four manuscript views bind source, code and reported review while retaining semantic boundary', t => { + const f = fixture(t), result = f.check(); + assert.equal(result.passed, true, JSON.stringify(result)); + assert.equal(result.semantic_status, 'not_evaluated'); + assert.equal(result.entries[0].effective_status, 'limited'); +}); + +test('reviewed full clause may pass within partial unit without certifying its neighbors', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.m.entries[0].fidelity = 'full'; f.m.entries[0].status = 'passed'; f.review.entries[0].fidelity = 'full'; + f.makeViews(); f.save(); + assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); + assert.equal(f.r.units[0].status, 'partial'); + f.r.units[0].status = 'formalized'; + f.write('run.json', JSON.stringify(f.r)); f.review.run_sha256 = hash(JSON.stringify(f.r)); f.save(); + assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); + f.kernel.checked = []; + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /Kernel cannot support/); +}); + +for (const [kind, mutate, pattern] of [ + ['snapshot', f => f.write('snapshot.txt', 'changed'), /hash drift/], + ['code', f => f.write('project/Fixture.lean', f.model + '-- changed\n'), /hash drift/], + ['review', f => f.write('review.json', '{}'), /hash drift/], + ['initial review', f => f.write('code-blind.md', 'changed'), /hash drift/], + ['manuscript', f => f.write('../details_en.md', 'changed'), /hash drift/], +]) test(`${kind} tampering fails without silently refreshing evidence`, t => { + const f = fixture(t); mutate(f); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), pattern); +}); + +test('current source drift preserves historical kernel result and marks all entries stale', t => { + const f = fixture(t); f.write('../current.txt', f.source + 'New conditions.\n'); + const result = f.check(); + assert.equal(result.passed, false); assert.equal(result.current_source, 'stale'); + assert.equal(result.entries[0].effective_status, 'stale'); + assert.equal(result.entries[0].kernel, 'passed'); +}); + +for (const [kind, mutate, pattern] of [ + ['missing review', f => { delete f.m.review; }, /Missing reported fidelity/], + ['review object', f => { f.review.code_sha256['project/Fixture.lean'] = '0'.repeat(64); }, /object binding/], + ['missing code blind record', f => { f.review.initial_records.pop(); }, /lacks initial/], + ['changed fidelity', f => { f.review.entries[0].fidelity = 'rejected'; }, /judgment mismatch/], + ['entry omission', f => { f.m.entries = []; }, /cover every/], + ['declaration omission', f => { f.m.entries[0].declarations = []; }, /declaration mapping/], + ['code omission', f => { f.m.code_files = []; }, /Code file inventory/], + ['excerpt mismatch', f => { f.m.entries[0].excerpt = 'Another claim'; }, /Source excerpt/], + ['false empty excerpt', f => { f.m.entries[0].excerpt = ''; }, /Empty excerpt/], + ['language status disagreement', f => { f.views.overview_zh = f.views.overview_zh.replace('lean-status limited', 'lean-status passed'); }, /status mismatch/], + ['quote omission', f => { f.views.overview_en = f.views.overview_en.replace(f.source, ''); }, /source quotation/], + ['code excerpt change', f => { f.views.details_en = f.views.details_en.replace(' : P := h', ' : P := by assumption'); }, /exact Lean code/], + ['line explanation omission', f => { f.views.details_zh = f.views.details_zh.replace(/[^\n]*/, ''); }, /line explanation/], + ['line explanation empty', f => { f.views.details_zh = f.views.details_zh.replace(/()[^\n]*/, '$1'); }, /Empty line explanation/], + ['invented failure', f => { f.m.entries[0].status = 'failed'; f.makeViews(); }, /Failure needs/], +]) test(`${kind} is rejected even when document hashes are refreshed`, t => { + const f = fixture(t); mutate(f); f.save(); assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), pattern); +}); + +test('unreviewed pending entry stays incomplete; structural content can be inapplicable', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + delete f.m.review; f.m.entries[0].fidelity = 'pending'; f.m.entries[0].status = 'incomplete'; + f.makeViews(); f.save(); assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); + f.r.units[0].clauses = []; f.r.units[0].status = 'structural'; + f.write('run.json', JSON.stringify(f.r)); + Object.assign(f.m.entries[0], { clause: null, declarations: [], kernel: 'not_checked', fidelity: 'not_applicable', status: 'not_applicable' }); + f.makeViews(); f.save(); assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); +}); + +test('countermodel success distinguishes supported nonentailment from refuted source claim', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.m.entries[0].countermodel = { declaration: 'Fixture.identity', verification: 'passed', target: 'refuted', source_relation: 'supports_nonentailment', reason: 'Synthetic checker fixture only; relevance is reviewed separately.' }; + f.save(); assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); + f.m.entries[0].countermodel.source_relation = 'refutes_source'; f.save(); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /Refuted source claim/); + f.m.entries[0].status = 'failed'; f.makeViews(); f.save(); + assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); +}); + +test('a countermodel supporting nonentailment cannot alone make the source fail', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.m.entries[0].countermodel = { declaration: 'Fixture.identity', verification: 'passed', target: 'refuted', source_relation: 'supports_nonentailment', reason: 'Synthetic status fixture; the negative source claim is supported.' }; + f.m.entries[0].status = 'failed'; f.makeViews(); f.save(); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /Failure needs/); + f.m.entries[0].fidelity = 'rejected'; f.review.entries[0].fidelity = 'rejected'; + f.makeViews(); f.save(); + assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); +}); + +test('kernel failure cannot support positive manuscript status', t => { + const f = fixture(t); f.kernel.passed = false; + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /Kernel cannot support/); +}); + +test('absolute paths and escaping symlinks are rejected', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.m.source_current.path = path.join(f.root, 'current.txt'); f.save(); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /paths must be relative/); + const outside = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'organon-outside-')); + t.after(() => fs.rmSync(outside, { recursive: true, force: true })); + fs.writeFileSync(path.join(outside, 'source.txt'), f.source); + fs.symlinkSync(path.join(outside, 'source.txt'), path.join(f.root, 'link.txt')); + f.m.source_current.path = '../link.txt'; f.save(); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /escapes repository/); +}); + +test('ordinary relocated copy has no dependency on original paths', t => { + const f = fixture(t), copy = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'organon-relocated-')); + t.after(() => fs.rmSync(copy, { recursive: true, force: true })); + fs.cpSync(f.root, copy, { recursive: true }); + assert.equal(checkManuscript(path.join(copy, 'package'), 'manuscript.json', f.kernel).passed, true); +}); + +const installed = fs.existsSync(path.join(process.env.ELAN_HOME ?? path.join(os.homedir(), '.elan'), 'toolchains/leanprover--lean4---v4.33.1/bin/lean')); +test('optional manuscript entry point follows a real Lean build and retains legacy behavior', { skip: installed ? false : 'Pinned Lean unavailable; no download attempted' }, t => { + const f = fixture(t); + const legacy = check(f.run); + assert.equal(legacy.passed, true, JSON.stringify(legacy)); assert.equal(legacy.manuscript, undefined); + const actual = check(f.run, { manuscript: 'manuscript.json' }); + assert.equal(actual.passed, true, JSON.stringify(actual)); assert.equal(actual.kernel_passed, true); assert.equal(actual.manuscript.passed, true); + f.write('../current.txt', f.source + 'changed'); + const stale = check(f.run, { manuscript: 'manuscript.json' }); + assert.equal(stale.passed, false); assert.equal(stale.kernel_passed, true); assert.equal(stale.manuscript.current_source, 'stale'); +}); + +test('a second conflicting status marker cannot hide behind the expected marker', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.views.overview_zh = f.views.overview_zh.replace('', '\n'); + f.save(); + assert.equal(f.check().passed, false); +}); + +test('public references cannot depend on a private local directory', t => { + const f = fixture(t); f.write('../.local/current.txt', f.source); + f.m.source_current.path = '../.local/current.txt'; f.save(); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /private/); +}); + +test('a checked definition alone does not qualify as a proved source claim', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.r.declarations[0].kind = 'definition'; f.write('run.json', JSON.stringify(f.r)); + f.review.run_sha256 = hash(JSON.stringify(f.r)); f.save(); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /proved declaration/); +}); + + +test('current adopted baseline drift makes unchanged source presentation stale', t => { + const f = fixture(t); + f.write('baseline.md', 'Adopted baseline v1.\n'); f.write('../baseline-current.md', 'Adopted baseline v1.\n'); + f.r.baseline = { path: 'baseline.md', sha256: hash('Adopted baseline v1.\n') }; + f.write('run.json', JSON.stringify(f.r)); f.review.run_sha256 = hash(JSON.stringify(f.r)); + f.m.baseline_current = { path: '../baseline-current.md', sha256: f.r.baseline.sha256 }; f.save(); + assert.equal(f.check().passed, true); + f.write('../baseline-current.md', 'Adopted baseline v2.\n'); + const result = f.check(); + assert.equal(result.current_source, 'current'); assert.equal(result.current_baseline, 'stale'); + assert.equal(result.passed, false); assert.equal(result.entries[0].effective_status, 'stale'); +}); + +test('public run with adopted baseline requires a current-baseline binding', t => { + const f = fixture(t); f.write('baseline.md', 'Baseline.\n'); + f.r.baseline = { path: 'baseline.md', sha256: hash('Baseline.\n') }; + f.write('run.json', JSON.stringify(f.r)); f.review.run_sha256 = hash(JSON.stringify(f.r)); f.save(); + assert.match(f.check().errors.join(), /current baseline/i); +}); diff --git a/tests/standalone-runtime.test.js b/tests/standalone-runtime.test.js new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b504a10 --- /dev/null +++ b/tests/standalone-runtime.test.js @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ +import test from 'node:test'; +import assert from 'node:assert/strict'; +import fs from 'node:fs'; +import os from 'node:os'; +import path from 'node:path'; +import { spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; +import { fileURLToPath } from 'node:url'; + +const core = fileURLToPath(new URL('../', import.meta.url)); + +test('Core runtime is usable from an ordinary copy without the outer package', t => { + const copy = fs.mkdtempSync(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'organon-core-runtime-')); + t.after(() => fs.rmSync(copy, { recursive: true, force: true })); + for (const name of ['package.json', 'PHILOSOPHY.md', 'scripts', 'skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts']) { + const destination = path.join(copy, name); + fs.mkdirSync(path.dirname(destination), { recursive: true }); + fs.cpSync(path.join(core, name), destination, { recursive: true }); + } + const result = spawnSync(process.execPath, ['--input-type=module', '-e', ` + import assert from 'node:assert/strict'; + import fs from 'node:fs'; + import { parseDocument } from './scripts/lib/sections.js'; + import * as frontmatter from './scripts/lib/frontmatter.js'; + import { check, TOOLCHAIN } from './skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js'; + import { checkManuscript } from './skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js'; + const source = fs.readFileSync('PHILOSOPHY.md', 'utf8'); + const parsed = parseDocument(source); + assert.equal(parsed.sections.map(s => s.raw).join(''), parsed.body); + assert.equal(parsed.sections[0].id, 'organon.preamble'); + assert.deepEqual(parseDocument(source.replaceAll('\\n', '\\r\\n')).sections, parsed.sections); + assert.throws(() => parseDocument(source.replace('organon.preamble', 'invalid')), /stable ID/); + assert.equal(frontmatter.coreWarnings, undefined); + assert.equal(typeof check, 'function'); + assert.equal(typeof checkManuscript, 'function'); + assert.equal(TOOLCHAIN, 'leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1'); + `], { cwd: copy, encoding: 'utf8' }); + assert.equal(result.status, 0, result.stderr); + const cli = spawnSync(process.execPath, ['skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js'], { cwd: copy, encoding: 'utf8' }); + assert.equal(cli.status, 2); + assert.match(cli.stderr, /Usage: node skills\/organon-core-leanify-prove\/scripts\/check.js/); +}); diff --git a/zh/AGENTS.md b/zh/AGENTS.md index 48e9134..7dee896 100644 --- a/zh/AGENTS.md +++ b/zh/AGENTS.md @@ -7,3 +7,11 @@ 处理 `zh/` 下的翻译时，建议在 subagent 可用且任务适合独立处理时，将翻译交给使用独立任务上下文的 subagent，以减少翻译过程占用主任务上下文。为其提供必要的对应英文基准、现有译文、本文件规则，以及相关术语和变更范围；由其返回修改摘要与未决问题，主代理负责核对译文及同步结果。小范围修改或 subagent 不可用时，可由主代理直接处理。翻译委派不替代独立审查。 对应的英文和中文文件应同步更新。翻译规则不扩展为一般哲学义务，也不取代根目录的维护流程、独立审查、用户决定或验证要求。 + +## Lean 对照稿 + +`zh/lean/` 翻译对应英文 `lean/` 的读者稿。逐主张速览与逐行详解必须保留同一来源、版本、声明及判定范围；Lean 代码、标识符、hash 和机器状态标记保持原样，解释文字使用中文。逐行稿覆盖英文稿中每个非空代码行，不以语法概述替代具体证明步骤和假设。 + +分别保留 Lean 检查结果、来源保真判断与汇总状态。不得把有限度通过译成完整通过，把未完成或支持不足译成原文为假，或把反模型检查成功译成受反驳推论通过。保留未完成、不适用、过期及失败原因。发现英文解释与代码或证据不符时返回该问题，不通过译文自行修复或升级判断；中文翻译不构成新的独立盲评。 + +Core 内的 Lean 工程、证据与读者稿按[根目录维护规则](../AGENTS.md#lean-evidence-maintenance)同步。正文、rationale、来源版本、编码、假设或相关工具／技能行为改变时，核对受影响的两种粒度和审查对象；未完成必要复核与翻译同步前，不宣称相关维护已完成。无关变更不要求重做全部保真审查。历史稿保留其冻结来源与历史判定，不冒充当前有效版本；仅迁移路径时须明确说明未变内容及复用依据。 diff --git a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md index bbe6ba3..08ea287 100644 --- a/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/zh/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.2 -core_version: 0.1.2 +philosophy_version: 0.1.3 +core_version: 0.1.3 derived_from: null --- # Organon 哲学：总纲与根据 @@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ derived_from: null ### 2.1 说明与检验责任 -说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 | 主张类型 | 检验责任 | 不能替代该责任的做法 | | --- | --- | --- | diff --git a/zh/lean/core-details.md b/zh/lean/core-details.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..4ae9409 --- /dev/null +++ b/zh/lean/core-details.md @@ -0,0 +1,4243 @@ +# Core——Lean 逐行详解 + +当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59`。[冻结源文](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](core-overview.md)。 + +本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 + +条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 + +条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'incomplete': 107, 'not_applicable': 7, 'limited': 7, 'failed': 2}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 + + +## organon.preamble + + + + + +### c-10-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是 Organon 哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-10-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是 Organon 哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-12-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-12-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter and Grounds constrain one another; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-12-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-12-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter + + + + + +### organon.charter · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## organon.charter.overview + + + + + +### c-22-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，将自身及其原则纳入生成与检验，并以自洽约束这一过程。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-22-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，将自身及其原则纳入生成与检验，并以自洽约束这一过程。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-24-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入它们自身的生成与检验范围。各项条件由下列分述明确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-24-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The provisions below specify the conditions for each. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入它们自身的生成与检验范围。各项条件由下列分述明确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence + + + + + +### c-29-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，不将任何既有构成视为生成的终点。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-29-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，不将任何既有构成视为生成的终点。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation + + + + + +### c-34-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。体系将这种拓展视为值得追求时，就具有内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-34-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。体系将这种拓展视为值得追求时，就具有内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-34-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。体系将这种拓展视为值得追求时，就具有内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality + + + + + +### c-39-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-39-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-39-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These remain within the scope of possible change; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-39-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits + + + + + +### c-44-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。不能仅凭产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加认定取得了进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-44-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。不能仅凭产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加认定取得了进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-44-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。不能仅凭产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加认定取得了进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-46-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “内在取向”表达 Organon 的哲学承诺，不声称所有体系事实上都会自主发展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-46-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “内在取向”表达 Organon 的哲学承诺，不声称所有体系事实上都会自主发展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-47-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自超越不意味着体系无需外部经验、知识或协作，也不保证能够自主执行或自行改善。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-48-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不将既有构成视为终点，不要求每次行动都产生改变。有根据的稳定与保留生成取向可以相容。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-48-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不将既有构成视为终点，不要求每次行动都产生改变。有根据的稳定与保留生成取向可以相容。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-49-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 超越是否拓展了可理解、可构成的可能，须有可辨识的根据；对生成的自我宣称不足以证明实际成效。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-49-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 超越是否拓展了可理解、可构成的可能，须有可辨识的根据；对生成的自我宣称不足以证明实际成效。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency + + + + + +### c-54-c1 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 在相同前提、概念含义与适用范围内，体系同时持有的原则和判断及其推论，不得对同一问题给出相互矛盾的判断。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** Consistent以整个同时持有列表推得同一context的正反结论，p/pImpliesQ/notQ实例确有联合推论。这里只表示一个问题和合并的context编号，未分开含义、假设、范围，也不是一般推论演算；义务仅被定义为谓词，未证明普遍履行。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.Consistent` — [CoreReader.lean:81](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L81); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-81). + + +```lean +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) +``` + +- `CoreReader.joint_conflict` — [CoreReader.lean:87](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-87). + + +```lean +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.meaning + + + + + +### c-59-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-59-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 缩减后的当前列表[.p,.pImpliesQ]在fixtureConsequence中没有否定结论，可示例说明撤回后的相容状态；未建模修订事件、前后时态关系或许可语义。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set` — [CoreReader.lean:94](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L94); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-94). + + +```lean +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### c-59-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-59-c4 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 选定的撤回操作在claimsUnchanged=true时不满足ChangeReported，只演示报告约束，并未证明报告实际发生。一般List不等还包含重排或重复元素的差别，强于语义变化；对应关系仅限展示的实质撤回实例。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.ChangeReported` — [CoreReader.lean:111](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L111); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-111). + + +```lean +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false +``` + +- `CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report` — [CoreReader.lean:117](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L117); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-117). + + +```lean +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### c-61-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的判断分歧不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-61-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的判断分歧不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 选定实例中，不同context编号下的相反结论不能组成同一context冲突，可展示原文“不自动构成矛盾”的区别；实际假设、含义、范围为何不同仍需在Lean之外解释。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.distinct_contexts` — [CoreReader.lean:101](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-101). + + +```lean +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### c-61-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的判断分歧不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.limits + + + + + +### c-66-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不同评价或价值之间存在张力，并不直接构成矛盾；当它们在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论时，需要修正或限定。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-66-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不同评价或价值之间存在张力，并不直接构成矛盾；当它们在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论时，需要修正或限定。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-67-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自洽不等于正确或充分。一套原则可以内部一致，却依赖错误前提，或者遗漏重要问题。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-67-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自洽不等于正确或充分。一套原则可以内部一致，却依赖错误前提，或者遗漏重要问题。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity + + + + + +### c-72-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系的生成与检验原则，同样约束体系自身，以及这些原则的形成、适用与修订。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning + + + + + +### c-77-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和修订因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-77-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和修订因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-77-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和修订因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.limits + + + + + +### c-82-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-82-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-82-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-83-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-application does not constitute self-proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自我适用不构成自我证明。原则接受自身的检验，不等于原则因此正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-83-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自我适用不构成自我证明。原则接受自身的检验，不等于原则因此正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 修订在SelfAssessingSystem中实际存储ownPrinciple与samples，并以同一所属谓词计算runOwnAssessment。展示的系统在自身样本[1]上返回true，而其自身谓词在0处为假，形成有解释依据的有限自评反例。空样本也通过，加入0则拒绝；另一个恒真所属原则既通过又普遍正确。因此对应仅限此具体所属关系与测试解释：不证明每次自评都不足，也未完整编码反身性、形成/修订、适用性或对评估规则本身的评价。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness` — [CoreReader.lean:167](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L167); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-167). + + +```lean +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### c-84-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 一个修订由体系自身产生，不等于它因此具有充分根据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.grounds + + + + + +### c-89-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 原则与判断的根据应可说明，并接受与主张性质相称的检验。主张的强度与适用范围，应与其根据所能提供的支持相称。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-89-c2 · 来源对应失败 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `rejected`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 原则与判断的根据应可说明，并接受与主张性质相称的检验。主张的强度与适用范围，应与其根据所能提供的支持相称。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** ObservationComplete只问列表是否包含所有自然数，没有观测结果、主张身份、根据关系或支持相称规则。真假算术结论仅分别与同一覆盖缺口并列，且真结论本身另有证明。未穷尽输入不等于支持不足，无观测结果的穷尽输入也不等于充分支持。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.ObservationComplete` — [CoreReader.lean:125](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L125); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-125). + + +```lean +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed +``` + +- `CoreReader.observation_gap` — [CoreReader.lean:130](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L130); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-130). + + +```lean +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 +``` + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:138](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L138); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-138). + + +```lean +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ +``` + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:145](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L145); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-145). + + +```lean +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + +## organon.grounds.assessment + + + + + +### c-94-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-94-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-94-c3 · 来源对应失败 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `rejected`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** unrelated_grounds_rejected因bothExamined要求编号3而拒绝编号4，只保留编号敏感性。它没有考察具体根据是否支持对应主张，没有考察结果，也没有将该记录解释为这种考察的依据。变量名examined不能建立原文责任。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:58](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L58); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-58). + + +```lean +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### c-94-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-94-c5 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** Duties保留同一主张/根据对上每个适用面的全称责任，经验/价值混合实例确实拒绝仅有经验记录。Aspect的三个构造子是预设应用分类，不是推导出的穷尽分类；mixed_projection展开既有责任假设，bothExamined预设记录。均未建模经验、推论、价值考察的实质责任，也未验证examined关系。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.Duties` — [CoreReader.lean:9](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L9); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-9). + + +```lean +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect +``` + +- `CoreReader.mixed_projection` — [CoreReader.lean:29](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L29); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-29). + + +```lean +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ +``` + +- `CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture` — [CoreReader.lean:43](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L43); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-43). + + +```lean +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ +``` + +- `CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:50](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L50); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-50). + + +```lean +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### c-94-c6 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** Assessed刻意忽略labels并依据实际适用性，因此任意标签列表在定义上等价，空列表也不能掩盖适用价值记录的缺失。这是条件化接口设计及具体遗漏探针，并非实际分类器发现全部适用责任的独立证明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive` — [CoreReader.lean:36](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L36); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-36). + + +```lean +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl +``` + +- `CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:66](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L66); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-66). + + +```lean +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### c-98-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Empirical claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### c-98-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-98-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-99-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inferential claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论主张 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### c-99-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论主张 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-99-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论主张 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-100-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Value commitment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### c-100-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-100-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-102-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-102-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-102-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-102-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.grounds.scope + + + + + +### c-107-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-107-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-107-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-109-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-109-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-109-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-109-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-111-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-111-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.grounds.capabilities + + + + + +### c-116-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-116-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-116-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-118-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-118-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-118-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-118-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-118-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations + + + + + +### c-123-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 实现方式的取舍，应有与所追求目标、价值及相关约束相联系的理由。名称、惯例或既有地位本身，不构成优先采用某种实现的充分根据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-123-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 实现方式的取舍，应有与所追求目标、价值及相关约束相联系的理由。名称、惯例或既有地位本身，不构成优先采用某种实现的充分根据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-125-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本选择条款增加一项额外的评价承诺：名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-125-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本选择条款增加一项额外的评价承诺：名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-125-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本选择条款增加一项额外的评价承诺：名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations.limits + + + + + +### c-130-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 开放不意味着所有实现等价，也不保证同一目标必然存在多种可行实现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-131-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及实现内部的方法就排除它们。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-131-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及实现内部的方法就排除它们。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-132-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 局部表现相同不足以证明整体等价。关系、条件和比较范围受“根据”各条款约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-132-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 局部表现相同不足以证明整体等价。关系、条件和比较范围受“根据”各条款约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-133-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 开放不是仅因一种实现已经存在或被惯常采用就否定它；该实现仍可凭相关理由获得优先。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-133-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relevant reasons may still give it priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 开放不是仅因一种实现已经存在或被惯常采用就否定它；该实现仍可凭相关理由获得优先。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.relationships + + + + + +### organon.relationships · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## organon.relationships.roles + + + + + +### c-141-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-141-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-141-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-141-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-141-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Each commitment needs its own reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-143-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-143-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-143-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-143-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-143-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-145-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-145-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-145-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-145-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-145-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## organon.relationships.terms + + + + + +### c-152-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Existing form +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有构成 | existing form | 体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### c-152-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有构成 | existing form | 体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### c-153-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及观察到的表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### c-153-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及观察到的表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + + + + + + + +### c-153-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +not limited to executable tests. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及观察到的表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## 完整受检代码与逐行解释 + +Code SHA256: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803`. 初始回译先于来源比较保存；以下当前代码修订采用明确标注的知情增量解释。 + + +```lean +namespace CoreReader + +inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value + deriving DecidableEq + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect + +def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := + Duties applicable examined claim grounds + +def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) + +def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := + claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.mixed_projection +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : + e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) + (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : + Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by + intro k hk + exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by + intro h + have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ + cases hv.2.1 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected +organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := + empirical_only_rejected + +inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo + deriving DecidableEq + +def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ + (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ + (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ + (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := + ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.joint_conflict +organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by + intro h + exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by + intro context h + simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.distinct_contexts +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-61-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by + intro context h + have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 + have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 + have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn + cases impossible + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.ChangeReported +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := + before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem changed_set_needs_report : + ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by + unfold ChangeReported + decide + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.ObservationComplete +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.observation_gap +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by + intro h + have h2 := h 2 + simp at h2 + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := + ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion +organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +-/ +theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : + ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by + refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 1 + cases bad + +def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n + +structure SelfAssessingSystem where + ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool + samples : List Nat + +def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := + s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple + +def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := + ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : + runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem + decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + simp [sampleSystem] at bad + +end CoreReader +``` + + + + + **L1** 打开 CoreReader 命名空间；后续声明名带此前缀。 + + + + **L3** 声明 Aspect 类型，恰有 empirical、inferential、value 三个互异的无参数构造子；名称本身没有定义领域含义。 + + + + **L4** 生成 DecidableEq 实例，使任意两个 Aspect 值的相等性可计算判定。 + + + + **L6** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L7** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L8** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L9** 开始定义命题 Duties，接收以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的任意适用性谓词 applicable。 + + + + **L10** 再接收关于主张编号、依据编号和 Aspect 的任意三元谓词 examined，以及显式自然数参数 claim、grounds；未假设这些谓词具备任何性质。 + + + + **L11** Duties 表示：对每个 Aspect，若它适用于当前主张，则 examined 对同一主张、同一依据及该 Aspect 成立。没有任何适用方面时，此条件空真。 + + + + **L13** 开始定义 Assessed，显式接收 Aspect 标签列表和任意适用性谓词；以下划线开头的标签参数未被使用。 + + + + **L14** 接收 examined 谓词以及自然数主张、依据编号；返回命题。 + + + + **L15** 将 Assessed 定义为这些谓词和编号对应的 Duties；标签既不限制也不加强该命题。 + + + + **L17** 定义以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的 mixedClaim。 + + + + **L18** 它恰在主张编号为 7 且方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；inferential 从不满足。 + + + + **L20** 定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 bothExamined。 + + + + **L21** 它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；合取向右嵌套。 + + + + **L23** 定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 empiricalOnly。 + + + + **L24** 它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 时成立；没有 value 或 inferential 分支。 + + + + **L26** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L27** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L28** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L29** 开始一个对任意适用性谓词 a 和 examined 谓词 e 全称参数化的定理。 + + + + **L30** 显式接收自然数 c、g，Duties a e c g 的假定证明 h，以及 empirical 和 value 适用于 c 的假定证明。 + + + + **L31** 结论是在同一 c、g 上的两个 e 事实同时成立；分别把 h 用于 he、hv，再组成合取。下划线是推断出的 Aspect 实参；没有脱离这些前提建立任何 examination 事实。 + + + + **L33** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L34** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L35** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L36** 开始一个关于任意两个标签列表 xs、ys 以及任意适用性谓词 a 的定理。 + + + + **L37** 还量化 examined 谓词以及主张、依据编号。 + + + + **L38** 用 Iff.rfl 证明两个 Assessed 命题等价：标签被忽略，两者都归约为同一 Duties 命题。这是定义恒等，不是关于标签的经验发现。 + + + + **L40** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L41** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L42** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L43** 陈述具体谓词 mixedClaim、bothExamined 在主张 7、依据 3 处满足 Duties，并开始 tactic 证明。 + + + + **L44** 引入任意方面 k 及 mixedClaim 7 k 的证明 hk。 + + + + **L45** 构造 bothExamined 7 3 k：复用 hk 中的 7 = 7，用自反性证明 3 = 3，再复用 hk 中的方面析取。 + + + + **L47** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L48** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L49** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L50** 陈述具体关系 empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处不满足 mixedClaim 的 Duties。 + + + + **L51** 假设所否定的 Duties 命题，目标为推出 False。 + + + + **L52** 把该假设用于 value；用 7 = 7 和右侧析取 value = value 建立适用性，得到 hv : empiricalOnly 7 3 value。 + + + + **L53** 取出 hv 最内层的等式 value = empirical，利用两个 Aspect 构造子互异将其消去。 + + + + **L55** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L56** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L57** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L58** 陈述在依据编号 4 而非 bothExamined 固定的 3 处，Duties 不成立。 + + + + **L59** 为推出矛盾，假设主张 7、依据 4 处成立 Duties。 + + + + **L60** 将其用于适用的 value 方面，得到 bothExamined 7 4 value。 + + + + **L61** 消去得到的等式 4 = 3，即 hv.2.1。矛盾来自数值不等，而非单独定义的相关性概念。 + + + + **L63** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L64** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L65** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L66** 陈述空标签列表无法使 mixedClaim、empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处的 Assessed 成立。 + + + + **L67** 直接复用 empirical_only_rejected；展开 Assessed 后恰为此前定理否定的命题。 + + + + **L69** 声明具有五个互异无参数构造子的 Fact 类型；pImpliesQ 是标记而非 Lean 蕴含，notQ 是标记而非逻辑否定。 + + + + **L70** 生成 Fact 的可判定相等性，使具体列表成员关系可计算判定。 + + + + **L72** 定义有限 Fact 标记列表、自然数语境和布尔极性之间的关系；列表不必无重复。 + + + + **L73** 第一个语境 0 分支要求极性为 true 且 p、pImpliesQ 都属于列表，或者采用下一行的备选条件。 + + + + **L74** 语境 0 的另一条件要求极性为 false 且 notQ 属于列表；此处结束语境 0 分支。 + + + + **L75** 独立分支要求语境为 1、极性为 true 且 positiveInOne 属于列表。 + + + + **L76** 最后一个分支要求语境为 2、极性为 false 且 negativeInTwo 属于列表；没有其他分支或推理规则。 + + + + **L78** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L79** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L80** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L81** 以所示类型的任意 consequence 关系及有限 Fact 标记列表定义 Consistent。 + + + + **L82** 要求每个自然数语境中，同一列表的 true 和 false 两种极性不能同时满足该关系；未限制所传关系必须对应逻辑蕴涵。 + + + + **L84** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L85** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L86** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L87** 陈述列表 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 在具体 fixtureConsequence 下不满足 Consistent。 + + + + **L88** 为推出矛盾，假设该列表满足一致性条件。 + + + + **L89** 将一致性条件用于语境 0，提供两种极性的证明；它们分别通过简化显式关系和具体列表成员关系得到。 + + + + **L91** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L92** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L93** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L94** 陈述较短列表 [p, pImpliesQ] 在 fixtureConsequence 下满足一致性条件。 + + + + **L95** 对任意语境，假设两种极性同时成立，目标为 False。 + + + + **L96** 简化 false 极性的假设 h.2；列表中既没有 notQ 也没有 negativeInTwo，因此所有 false 分支都不可能。 + + + + **L98** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L99** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L100** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L101** 陈述 [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] 在示例关系下满足一致性条件。 + + + + **L102** 引入同一个语境，并假设两种极性都在其中成立。 + + + + **L103** 简化 true 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 1。 + + + + **L104** 简化 false 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 2。 + + + + **L105** 把第一个等式反向后与第二个复合，得到不可能的自然数等式 1 = 2。 + + + + **L106** 消去不可能的等式，完成矛盾证明。 + + + + **L108** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L109** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L110** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L111** 以两个列表和名为 claimsUnchanged 的布尔值定义 ChangeReported；这些都是显式输入，没有时间、说话者或报告对象。 + + + + **L112** 要求列表不等蕴含 claimsUnchanged = false；列表相等时条件空真。列表相等区分顺序和重复次数；false 不提供任何报告内容。 + + + + **L114** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L115** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L116** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L117** 开始如下关于 ChangeReported 的具体否定定理。 + + + + **L118** 陈述从 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 改为 [p, pImpliesQ] 且传入 true 时不满足 ChangeReported。 + + + + **L119** 将 ChangeReported 展开为从列表不等到布尔等式的蕴含。 + + + + **L120** 计算判定这个具体命题：列表不同，但 true 不等于 false。 + + + + **L122** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L123** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L124** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L125** 定义 ObservationComplete observed 为每个自然数都属于有限列表 observed；未标注类型的 n 由成员关系推断为 Nat。没有建模观察过程。 + + + + **L127** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L128** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L129** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L130** 陈述列表 [0, 1] 不包含全部自然数。 + + + + **L131** 为推出矛盾，假设其完备。 + + + + **L132** 把全称成员假设用于 2，得到 2 ∈ [0, 1]。 + + + + **L133** 将这个不可能的具体成员关系简化为 False。 + + + + **L135** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L136** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L137** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L138** 开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个算术真命题。 + + + + **L139** 同时陈述 [0, 1] 不满足 ObservationComplete，以及每个自然数满足 n + 0 = n。 + + + + **L140** 用 observation_gap 和对每个自然数给出自反性证明的函数构造合取；Nat 加法把 n + 0 归约为 n。算术证明独立于列表。 + + + + **L142** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L143** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L144** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L145** 开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个错误全称等式。 + + + + **L146** 同时陈述 [0, 1] 不完备，以及“每个自然数都等于 0”为假。 + + + + **L147** 把 observation_gap 用作第一个合取项，留下被否定全称命题的证明目标。 + + + + **L148** 假设所有自然数都等于 0，目标为 False。 + + + + **L149** 将假设用于 1，得到 1 = 0。 + + + + **L150** 消去不可能的数值等式。 + + + + **L152** 将 proposedPrinciple n 定义为自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n；名称没有赋予其哲学或规范地位。 + + + + **L154** 声明 SelfAssessingSystem 记录，含一个已存储的自然数到布尔值的谓词和一个样本列表；没有约束两个字段的不变量。 + + + + **L155** 声明 ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool，作为系统记录中存储的任意布尔值函数；字段名本身不建立作者身份、所有权或哲学地位。 + + + + **L156** 声明 samples 为有限自然数列表，可为空或重复；未要求样本完备或满足选取条件。 + + + + **L158** 将 runOwnAssessment 定义为接收整个 SelfAssessingSystem 记录并返回布尔值的函数。 + + + + **L159** 以同一记录的 ownPrinciple 函数对其 samples 执行 List.all；恰在每个列表输入都计算为 true 时返回 true，空列表返回 true。这是实际的有限布尔计算，而非外部提供的命题。 + + + + **L161** 开始定义具体 sampleSystem 记录。 + + + + **L162** 存储判定自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n 的函数，以及单元素样本列表 [1]；decide 将每个可判定算术命题转为布尔值。这里重复了 proposedPrinciple 中的表达式，但没有引用该定义。 + + + + **L164** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L165** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L166** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L167** 开始定理，比较此系统有限评估的结果与其已存函数在所有输入处的满足性。 + + + + **L168** 陈述 runOwnAssessment 对 sampleSystem 返回 true，同时否定“每个自然数都使同一 sampleSystem.ownPrinciple 返回 true”；全称变量 n 推断为 Nat。 + + + + **L169** 将合取拆为实际评估值的等式和全称函数值等式的否定。 + + + + **L170** 对第一个合取项，展开 runOwnAssessment 和 sampleSystem，得到用等式判定函数在 [1] 上执行 List.all。 + + + + **L171** 计算单元素样本评估：等式在 1 处成立，因此 all 的结果等于 true。 + + + + **L172** 对第二个合取项，假设已存布尔函数在每个自然数处都返回 true。 + + + + **L173** 将该全称布尔等式用于 0。 + + + + **L174** 展开 sampleSystem 并简化：0 处的等式为假，因此假设要求 false = true，产生矛盾。 + + + + **L176** 关闭 CoreReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/zh/lean/core-overview.md b/zh/lean/core-overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9f1177d --- /dev/null +++ b/zh/lean/core-overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,3583 @@ +# Core——逐主张速览 + +当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59`。[冻结源文](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](core-details.md)。 + +本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 + +条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 + +条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'incomplete': 107, 'not_applicable': 7, 'limited': 7, 'failed': 2}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 + + +## organon.preamble + + + + + +### c-10-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是 Organon 哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-10-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-10-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是 Organon 哲学正本的中文对应译本，表达已采纳的承诺，不断言所有体系事实上具有这些属性，也不证明这些承诺普遍正确。[英文正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md) 与本文章节对应；含义发生分歧时以英文为准。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-10-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-12-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter and Grounds constrain one another; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-12-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-12-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-12-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +引用正文、含义及适用条件共同构成核心。总纲与根据相互约束；这种分组既不确立推导层级，也不确立优先次序。[配套论证](rationale.md) 提供论证与情境，不向核心增加义务。Skill 是在本仓库已说明的目标与约束下形成的可修订应用，不属于哲学承诺本身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-12-c4) + + + + +## organon.charter + + + + + +### organon.charter · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](core-details.md#organon.charter) + + + + +## organon.charter.overview + + + + + +### c-22-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，将自身及其原则纳入生成与检验，并以自洽约束这一过程。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-22-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-22-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，将自身及其原则纳入生成与检验，并以自洽约束这一过程。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-22-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-24-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入它们自身的生成与检验范围。各项条件由下列分述明确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-24-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-24-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The provisions below specify the conditions for each. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总述连接三个不同的要求：自超越确立生成取向，并拒绝将既有构成视为终点，自洽约束同时持有的判断，反身将体系及其原则纳入它们自身的生成与检验范围。各项条件由下列分述明确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-24-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence + + + + + +### c-29-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，不将任何既有构成视为生成的终点。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-29-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-29-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系以拓展自身所能理解和所能构成的可能性为内在取向，不将任何既有构成视为生成的终点。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-29-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation + + + + + +### c-34-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。体系将这种拓展视为值得追求时，就具有内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-34-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-34-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。体系将这种拓展视为值得追求时，就具有内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-34-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-34-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对生成可能保持开放的承诺，与珍视这种可能的拓展有所区别。体系将这种拓展视为值得追求时，就具有内在取向。仅仅允许变化不足以表达这一取向。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-34-c3) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality + + + + + +### c-39-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-39-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-39-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-39-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-39-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These remain within the scope of possible change; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-39-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-39-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +不将既有构成认定为终点，使其保持可被超越的开放性。“既有构成”包括体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。这些都处于可能改变的范围内；可修订性不保证实际取得进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-39-c4) + + + + +## organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits + + + + + +### c-44-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。不能仅凭产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加认定取得了进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-44-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-44-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。不能仅凭产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加认定取得了进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-44-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-44-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +是否实际取得进展，仍需另行判断。具有这一取向不保证取得进展。不能仅凭产物数量、抽象层数或术语数量的增加认定取得了进展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-44-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-46-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “内在取向”表达 Organon 的哲学承诺，不声称所有体系事实上都会自主发展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-46-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-46-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “内在取向”表达 Organon 的哲学承诺，不声称所有体系事实上都会自主发展。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-46-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-47-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自超越不意味着体系无需外部经验、知识或协作，也不保证能够自主执行或自行改善。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-47-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-48-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不将既有构成视为终点，不要求每次行动都产生改变。有根据的稳定与保留生成取向可以相容。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-48-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-48-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不将既有构成视为终点，不要求每次行动都产生改变。有根据的稳定与保留生成取向可以相容。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-48-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-49-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 超越是否拓展了可理解、可构成的可能，须有可辨识的根据；对生成的自我宣称不足以证明实际成效。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-49-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-49-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 超越是否拓展了可理解、可构成的可能，须有可辨识的根据；对生成的自我宣称不足以证明实际成效。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-49-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency + + + + + +### c-54-c1 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 在相同前提、概念含义与适用范围内，体系同时持有的原则和判断及其推论，不得对同一问题给出相互矛盾的判断。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** Consistent以整个同时持有列表推得同一context的正反结论，p/pImpliesQ/notQ实例确有联合推论。这里只表示一个问题和合并的context编号，未分开含义、假设、范围，也不是一般推论演算；义务仅被定义为谓词，未证明普遍履行。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.Consistent` — [CoreReader.lean:81](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L81); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-81). + +- `CoreReader.joint_conflict` — [CoreReader.lean:87](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-87). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-54-c1) + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.meaning + + + + + +### c-59-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-59-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-59-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 缩减后的当前列表[.p,.pImpliesQ]在fixtureConsequence中没有否定结论，可示例说明撤回后的相容状态；未建模修订事件、前后时态关系或许可语义。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set` — [CoreReader.lean:94](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L94); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-94). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-59-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-59-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-59-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-59-c4 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“同时持有”限定了需要共同成立的原则、判断及其推论。修订可以撤回旧判断，不要求新旧原则永远相容；发生了变化，就不能将该变化表述为从未发生。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 选定的撤回操作在claimsUnchanged=true时不满足ChangeReported，只演示报告约束，并未证明报告实际发生。一般List不等还包含重排或重复元素的差别，强于语义变化；对应关系仅限展示的实质撤回实例。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.ChangeReported` — [CoreReader.lean:111](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L111); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-111). + +- `CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report` — [CoreReader.lean:117](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L117); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-117). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-59-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-61-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的判断分歧不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-61-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-61-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的判断分歧不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 选定实例中，不同context编号下的相反结论不能组成同一context冲突，可展示原文“不自动构成矛盾”的区别；实际假设、含义、范围为何不同仍需在Lean之外解释。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.distinct_contexts` — [CoreReader.lean:101](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-101). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-61-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-61-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +“相同前提、概念含义与适用范围”限定判断之间的比较。不同条件下的判断分歧不自动构成矛盾；暗中改变前提、词义或范围，也不能用于掩盖原有矛盾。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-61-c3) + + + + +## organon.charter.consistency.limits + + + + + +### c-66-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不同评价或价值之间存在张力，并不直接构成矛盾；当它们在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论时，需要修正或限定。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-66-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-66-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 不同评价或价值之间存在张力，并不直接构成矛盾；当它们在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论时，需要修正或限定。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-66-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-67-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自洽不等于正确或充分。一套原则可以内部一致，却依赖错误前提，或者遗漏重要问题。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-67-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-67-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自洽不等于正确或充分。一套原则可以内部一致，却依赖错误前提，或者遗漏重要问题。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-67-c2) + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity + + + + + +### c-72-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 体系的生成与检验原则，同样约束体系自身，以及这些原则的形成、适用与修订。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-72-c1) + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning + + + + + +### c-77-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和修订因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-77-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-77-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和修订因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-77-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-77-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +反身覆盖体系自身与原则本身两个对象。不仅检验体系是否符合原则，也检验原则如何形成、适用于何处，以及为何可能需要修订。原则的形成和修订因此也成为生成与检验的对象。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-77-c3) + + + + +## organon.charter.reflexivity.limits + + + + + +### c-82-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-82-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-82-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-82-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-82-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- “同样约束”保留适用条件。相关条件成立时，不能仅因对象是自身就获得豁免；也不能仅因要求反身，就声称所有原则都可以不加辨析地用于自身。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-82-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-83-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-application does not constitute self-proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自我适用不构成自我证明。原则接受自身的检验，不等于原则因此正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-83-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-83-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 自我适用不构成自我证明。原则接受自身的检验，不等于原则因此正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 修订在SelfAssessingSystem中实际存储ownPrinciple与samples，并以同一所属谓词计算runOwnAssessment。展示的系统在自身样本[1]上返回true，而其自身谓词在0处为假，形成有解释依据的有限自评反例。空样本也通过，加入0则拒绝；另一个恒真所属原则既通过又普遍正确。因此对应仅限此具体所属关系与测试解释：不证明每次自评都不足，也未完整编码反身性、形成/修订、适用性或对评估规则本身的评价。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness` — [CoreReader.lean:167](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L167); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-167). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-83-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-84-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 一个修订由体系自身产生，不等于它因此具有充分根据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-84-c1) + + + + +## organon.grounds + + + + + +### c-89-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 原则与判断的根据应可说明，并接受与主张性质相称的检验。主张的强度与适用范围，应与其根据所能提供的支持相称。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-89-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-89-c2 · 来源对应失败 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `rejected`. **单元正文 hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 原则与判断的根据应可说明，并接受与主张性质相称的检验。主张的强度与适用范围，应与其根据所能提供的支持相称。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** ObservationComplete只问列表是否包含所有自然数，没有观测结果、主张身份、根据关系或支持相称规则。真假算术结论仅分别与同一覆盖缺口并列，且真结论本身另有证明。未穷尽输入不等于支持不足，无观测结果的穷尽输入也不等于充分支持。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.ObservationComplete` — [CoreReader.lean:125](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L125); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-125). + +- `CoreReader.observation_gap` — [CoreReader.lean:130](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L130); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-130). + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:138](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L138); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-138). + +- `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:145](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L145); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-145). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-89-c2) + + + + +## organon.grounds.assessment + + + + + +### c-94-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-94-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-94-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c3 · 来源对应失败 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `rejected`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** unrelated_grounds_rejected因bothExamined要求编号3而拒绝编号4，只保留编号敏感性。它没有考察具体根据是否支持对应主张，没有考察结果，也没有将该记录解释为这种考察的依据。变量名examined不能建立原文责任。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:58](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L58); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-58). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-94-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-94-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c5 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** Duties保留同一主张/根据对上每个适用面的全称责任，经验/价值混合实例确实拒绝仅有经验记录。Aspect的三个构造子是预设应用分类，不是推导出的穷尽分类；mixed_projection展开既有责任假设，bothExamined预设记录。均未建模经验、推论、价值考察的实质责任，也未验证examined关系。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.Duties` — [CoreReader.lean:9](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L9); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-9). + +- `CoreReader.mixed_projection` — [CoreReader.lean:29](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L29); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-29). + +- `CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture` — [CoreReader.lean:43](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L43); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-43). + +- `CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:50](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L50); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-50). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-94-c5) + + + + + + + +### c-94-c6 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +说明与检验承担不同责任。可说明性要求能够辨明概念、前提、理由及限度；检验要求审查这些根据能否支持相应主张。根据表达清楚，不等于根据已经充分成立。 一项主张具有多个适用方面时，相应的检验责任分别适用于各方面。遗漏分类并不免除适用的责任。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** Assessed刻意忽略labels并依据实际适用性，因此任意标签列表在定义上等价，空列表也不能掩盖适用价值记录的缺失。这是条件化接口设计及具体遗漏探针，并非实际分类器发现全部适用责任的独立证明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive` — [CoreReader.lean:36](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L36); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-36). + +- `CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:66](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L66); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](core-details.md#line-66). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-94-c6) + + + + + + + +### c-98-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Empirical claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-98-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-98-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-98-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-98-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 经验主张 | 审查观测、证据与表现，以及它们支持主张的条件、范围和不确定性。 | 将可度量或可重复本身当作相关性、正确性或价值的证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-98-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-99-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inferential claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论主张 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-99-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-99-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论主张 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-99-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-99-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论主张 | 审查结论是否由所说明的前提和推理关系得到支持。 | 仅因结论与前提没有冲突，就认定结论已经由前提推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-99-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-100-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Value commitment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-100-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-100-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-100-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-100-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 价值承诺 | 说明所采取的立场、理由、适用限度及后果，并接受相应质疑。 | 将承诺冒充经验事实或必然推论，或以自我宣称替代理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-100-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-102-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-102-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-102-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-102-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +起始价值承诺可以明确作为承诺提出，不要求通过自身证明全部起始前提。主张的强度与适用范围不要求统一换算成数值；不同类型的主张按其性质说明支持与限度。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-102-c4) + + + + +## organon.grounds.scope + + + + + +### c-107-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-107-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-107-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-107-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-107-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +表现总在特定关系、条件和观察范围中被辨识。边界有助于说明比较涉及什么，但局部样例不能自动支持无条件的普遍结论；判断不能因选定的范围遗漏相关差异，就宣称这些差异不存在。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-107-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-109-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-109-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-109-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-109-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较；重复评价可以帮助检查相应结论的稳定性。两者及任何检验框架的作用，都须相对于主张和情境说明。度量、可重复性与检验框架不组成所有判断都必须依赖的普遍必然链。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-109-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-111-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-111-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-111-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +未复现的观察仍可能提供有限支持；随机结果不必逐次相同。需要区分观察的可核查性、条件的可复现性及结论的稳定性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-111-c2) + + + + +## organon.grounds.capabilities + + + + + +### c-116-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-116-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-116-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-116-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-116-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张接受根据的约束：须能辨明所声称的能力、其条件及支持。核心不统一规定方法掌握、方法生成或能力等级的定义。具体应用明确其所评价的能力，可以要求理解、解释或在相关变化中的表现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-116-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-118-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-118-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-118-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-118-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-118-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +能力主张的根据可以由外部评价者提供。根据可说明，并不因此要求被评价体系理解或解释其内部生成过程。可靠产出的证据须依实际声称的能力接受检验，不自动确立对生成过程的理解。方法文档、术语、工具或产物的数量，也不能单独确立超出该证据所能支持的能力。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-118-c5) + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations + + + + + +### c-123-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 实现方式的取舍，应有与所追求目标、价值及相关约束相联系的理由。名称、惯例或既有地位本身，不构成优先采用某种实现的充分根据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-123-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-123-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +> 实现方式的取舍，应有与所追求目标、价值及相关约束相联系的理由。名称、惯例或既有地位本身，不构成优先采用某种实现的充分根据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-123-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-125-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本选择条款增加一项额外的评价承诺：名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-125-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-125-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本选择条款增加一项额外的评价承诺：名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-125-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-125-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本选择条款增加一项额外的评价承诺：名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性。将其归入根据，不表示它可以从检验理由的一般要求推出，也不表示它可以仅从表现的可辨识性推出。惯例和已有安排可以具有实际意义，但需要说明这种意义与所追求目标、价值及约束的关系。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-125-c3) + + + + +## organon.grounds.implementations.limits + + + + + +### c-130-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 开放不意味着所有实现等价，也不保证同一目标必然存在多种可行实现。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-130-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-131-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及实现内部的方法就排除它们。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-131-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-131-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 方法的解释力、适用边界、简约性及明确的过程要求，都可以成为有根据的评价理由；不能仅因它们涉及实现内部的方法就排除它们。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-131-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-132-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 局部表现相同不足以证明整体等价。关系、条件和比较范围受“根据”各条款约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-132-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-132-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 局部表现相同不足以证明整体等价。关系、条件和比较范围受“根据”各条款约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-132-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-133-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 开放不是仅因一种实现已经存在或被惯常采用就否定它；该实现仍可凭相关理由获得优先。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-133-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-133-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relevant reasons may still give it priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +- 开放不是仅因一种实现已经存在或被惯常采用就否定它；该实现仍可凭相关理由获得优先。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-133-c2) + + + + +## organon.relationships + + + + + +### organon.relationships · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](core-details.md#organon.relationships) + + + + +## organon.relationships.roles + + + + + +### c-141-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-141-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-141-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-141-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-141-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-141-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Each commitment needs its own reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +总纲表达生成取向、一致性约束与反身适用；根据规定判断所需支持的要求，并包含关于实现选择的额外承诺。两部分都属于核心，且相互约束。这种安排既不使根据成为总纲的推论，也不使总纲优先于根据。每项承诺都需要自己的理由。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-141-c5) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-143-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-143-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-143-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-143-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-143-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自洽关注同时持有的判断能否共同成立，根据关注主张是否得到支持，以及得到多大程度的支持。与前提不冲突的结论，仍可能没有被前提支持。自超越规定生成取向与非终局性，两者都不确立实际能力。具体应用可以提供目标、价值及能力定义；在这些目标、价值及定义下提出的主张，仍接受相关核心条款的约束。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-143-c5) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-145-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-145-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-145-c3) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-145-c4) + + + + + + + +### c-145-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自超越不替代反身：使既有构成保持可被超越的开放性，与将相关原则用于体系及这些原则自身的形成、适用和修订有所区别。反身将这些要求延伸至体系自身，以及体系原则的形成、适用和修订。“根据”各条款自身的根据与限度须可说明；体系自身的能力主张仍须接受检验；本哲学的既有构成也不能仅凭既有地位获得优先。这种相互适用没有提供自我证明，也不取消适用条件。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-145-c5) + + + + +## organon.relationships.terms + + + + + +### c-152-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Existing form +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有构成 | existing form | 体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-152-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-152-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有构成 | existing form | 体系当前的组织方式、方法和原则，不仅指外观或已有产物。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-152-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-153-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及观察到的表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-153-c1) + + + + + + + +### c-153-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及观察到的表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-153-c2) + + + + + + + +### c-153-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +not limited to executable tests. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 检验 | assessment | 包括对理由、适用性及观察到的表现的审查，不限于可执行的测试。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](core-details.md#c-153-c3) + + diff --git a/zh/lean/rationale-details.md b/zh/lean/rationale-details.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..557ff7b --- /dev/null +++ b/zh/lean/rationale-details.md @@ -0,0 +1,10345 @@ +# Rationale——Lean 逐行详解 + +本版采用修订后的 Core 工具说明源文。未变化的代码及初始解释明确复用，不冒充新的盲评；修改的实现说明行仍未形式化。此前源文和读者稿保留为历史证据。 + +当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c`。[冻结源文](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](rationale-overview.md)。 + +本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 + +条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 + +条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 264, 'limited': 7}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-68). + + +```lean +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-73). + + +```lean +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-78). + + +```lean +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h +``` + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-87). + + +```lean +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-60). + + +```lean +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-31). + + +```lean +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-46). + + +```lean +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + + +```lean +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-54). + + +```lean +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide +``` + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-101). + + +```lean +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide +``` + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 表格中的实现名称，没有独立待证明命题。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + + + + +## 完整受检代码与逐行解释 + +Code SHA256: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7`. 初始回译先于来源比较保存；以下当前代码修订采用明确标注的知情增量解释。 + + +```lean +namespace RationaleReader + +structure ServiceState where + acknowledged : Nat + cached : Nat + deriving DecidableEq + +def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged + +def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached + +def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } + +def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ + +structure LatencyContext where + directLatency : Nat + cacheLatency : Nat + budget : Nat + +def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ + +def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ + +def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := + c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison +rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem update_read_counterexample : + direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ + direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted +rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by + intro h + have bad := h 11 + simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem unchanged_update_retained : + direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct +rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef +-/ +theorem budget_change_is_distinct : + withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by + unfold withinBudget + decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement +rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by + intro h + have bad := h 2 + cases bad with + | step h => cases h + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim +rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 +-/ +theorem proof_of_different_claim : + (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := + ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ + +def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] + +def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] + +def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := + states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) + +/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case +rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 +-/ +theorem revised_method_retains_case : + compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ + compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide + +end RationaleReader +``` + + + + + **L1** 打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 + + + + **L3** 声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 + + + + **L4** 声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 + + + + **L5** 声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 + + + + **L6** 通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 + + + + **L8** 将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + + + + **L10** 将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 + + + + **L12** 将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 + + + + **L14** 将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 + + + + **L16** 声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 + + + + **L17** 声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 + + + + **L18** 声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 + + + + **L19** 声明 budget，取任意自然数。 + + + + **L21** 将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 + + + + **L23** 将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 + + + + **L25** 开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 + + + + **L26** 使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 + + + + **L28** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L29** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L30** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L31** 陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 + + + + **L32** 将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 + + + + **L33** 通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 + + + + **L35** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L36** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L37** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L38** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L39** 开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 + + + + **L40** 第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 + + + + **L41** 第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 + + + + **L43** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L44** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L45** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L46** 陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 + + + + **L47** 为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 + + + + **L48** 将其用于 11。 + + + + **L49** 展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 + + + + **L51** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L52** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L53** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L54** 开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 + + + + **L55** 计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 + + + + **L57** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L58** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L59** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L60** 开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 + + + + **L61** 陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 + + + + **L62** 将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 + + + + **L63** 计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 + + + + **L65** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L66** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L67** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L68** 对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 + + + + **L70** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L71** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L72** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L73** 通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 + + + + **L75** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L76** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L77** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L78** 陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 + + + + **L79** 为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 + + + + **L80** 将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 + + + + **L81** 利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 + + + + **L82** 在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 + + + + **L84** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L85** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L86** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L87** 开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 + + + + **L88** 同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 + + + + **L89** 复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 + + + + **L91** 将 originalStates 定义为单元素状态列表 [initial]，唯一状态的字段为 (10, 10)。 + + + + **L93** 将 revisedStates 定义为 [initial, updateOnly initial 11]，保留同一初始状态并追加状态 (11, 10)；这是纯状态列表，而非带时间的执行轨迹。 + + + + **L95** 定义 compareReads，将有限 ServiceState 列表映射为有限自然数对列表；× 表示积类型。 + + + + **L96** 依次将各状态映射为其 direct、cachedRead 投影组成的数对；List.map 保持列表顺序和长度。此函数记录数对，本身不检查相等或判定等价。 + + + + **L98** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 + + + + **L99** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 + + + + **L100** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 + + + + **L101** 开始一个具体定理，记录原状态列表和修订状态列表的输出。 + + + + **L102** 第一个合取项陈述 compareReads 在 originalStates 上恰得到单元素数对列表 [(10, 10)]。 + + + + **L103** 第二个合取项陈述修订输出恰为 [(10, 10), (11, 10)]；decide 计算两个等式。原有相等数对被保留，新增不等数对也在结果中；没有声称服务已修复。 + + + + **L105** 关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/zh/lean/rationale-overview.md b/zh/lean/rationale-overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c623967 --- /dev/null +++ b/zh/lean/rationale-overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,10570 @@ +# Rationale——逐主张速览 + +本版采用修订后的 Core 工具说明源文。未变化的代码及初始解释明确复用，不冒充新的盲评；修改的实现说明行仍未形式化。此前源文和读者稿保留为历史证据。 + +当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c`。[冻结源文](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](rationale-details.md)。 + +本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 + +条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 + +条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 264, 'limited': 7}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 + + +## rationale.L1 + + + + + +### r-struct-1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +# Organon Rationale + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-1) + + + + +## rationale.L2 + + + + + +### r-struct-2 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-2) + + + + +## rationale.L3 + + + + + +### r-3-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-3-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-3-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not add obligations to the philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-3-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L4 + + + + + +### r-struct-4 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-4) + + + + +## rationale.L5 + + + + + +### r-5-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-5-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L6 + + + + + +### r-struct-6 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-6) + + + + +## rationale.L7 + + + + + +### r-struct-7 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-7) + + + + +## rationale.L8 + + + + + +### r-struct-8 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-8) + + + + +## rationale.L9 + + + + + +### r-struct-9 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-9) + + + + +## rationale.L10 + + + + + +### r-struct-10 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-10) + + + + +## rationale.L11 + + + + + +### r-11-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative Drive +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-11-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L12 + + + + + +### r-12-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency and Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Charter, unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-12-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L13 + + + + + +### r-13-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General requirements and limits retain their normative force. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-13-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L14 + + + + + +### r-14-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-14-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L15 + + + + + +### r-15-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The provision and its conditions remain. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-15-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L16 + + + + + +### r-16-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-16-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L17 + + + + + +### r-struct-17 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-17) + + + + +## rationale.L18 + + + + + +### r-struct-18 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-18) + + + + +## rationale.L19 + + + + + +### r-struct-19 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-19) + + + + +## rationale.L20 + + + + + +### r-struct-20 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.1 Commitments and Objections + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-20) + + + + +## rationale.L21 + + + + + +### r-struct-21 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-21) + + + + +## rationale.L22 + + + + + +### r-22-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-22-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-22-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-22-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L23 + + + + + +### r-struct-23 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-23) + + + + +## rationale.L24 + + + + + +### r-struct-24 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-24) + + + + +## rationale.L25 + + + + + +### r-struct-25 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-25) + + + + +## rationale.L26 + + + + + +### r-26-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-26-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L27 + + + + + +### r-27-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports examining their compatibility. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-27-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L28 + + + + + +### r-28-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-28-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L29 + + + + + +### r-29-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-29-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L30 + + + + + +### r-30-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +They are not disallowed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-30-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L31 + + + + + +### r-struct-31 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-31) + + + + +## rationale.L32 + + + + + +### r-32-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-32-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L33 + + + + + +### r-struct-33 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-33) + + + + +## rationale.L34 + + + + + +### r-struct-34 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-34) + + + + +## rationale.L35 + + + + + +### r-struct-35 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-35) + + + + +## rationale.L36 + + + + + +### r-36-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current core withdraws that uniform definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-36-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L37 + + + + + +### r-struct-37 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-37) + + + + +## rationale.L38 + + + + + +### r-38-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-38-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L39 + + + + + +### r-struct-39 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-39) + + + + +## rationale.L40 + + + + + +### r-40-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-40-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L41 + + + + + +### r-struct-41 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-41) + + + + +## rationale.L42 + + + + + +### r-struct-42 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.3 Assessment Tools + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-42) + + + + +## rationale.L43 + + + + + +### r-struct-43 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-43) + + + + +## rationale.L44 + + + + + +### r-44-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Each choice needs contextual reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-44-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L45 + + + + + +### r-struct-45 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-45) + + + + +## rationale.L46 + + + + + +### r-struct-46 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-46) + + + + +## rationale.L47 + + + + + +### r-struct-47 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-47) + + + + +## rationale.L48 + + + + + +### r-48-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-48-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L49 + + + + + +### r-struct-49 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-49) + + + + +## rationale.L50 + + + + + +### r-50-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-50-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L51 + + + + + +### r-struct-51 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-51) + + + + +## rationale.L52 + + + + + +### r-struct-52 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 3. Removal Check + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-52) + + + + +## rationale.L53 + + + + + +### r-struct-53 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-53) + + + + +## rationale.L54 + + + + + +### r-struct-54 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-54) + + + + +## rationale.L55 + + + + + +### r-struct-55 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-55) + + + + +## rationale.L56 + + + + + +### r-56-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-56-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L57 + + + + + +### r-57-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-57-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L58 + + + + + +### r-58-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-58-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L59 + + + + + +### r-59-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-59-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-59-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-59-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L60 + + + + + +### r-60-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-60-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-60-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-60-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L61 + + + + + +### r-struct-61 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-61) + + + + +## rationale.L62 + + + + + +### r-62-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-62-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L63 + + + + + +### r-struct-63 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-63) + + + + +## rationale.L64 + + + + + +### r-struct-64 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 4. Illustrative Cases + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-64) + + + + +## rationale.L65 + + + + + +### r-struct-65 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-65) + + + + +## rationale.L66 + + + + + +### r-66-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examine the meaning of the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-66-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they are not steps a system is required to execute. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L67 + + + + + +### r-struct-67 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-67) + + + + +## rationale.L68 + + + + + +### r-struct-68 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Case | Judgment and limits | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-68) + + + + +## rationale.L69 + + + + + +### r-struct-69 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-69) + + + + +## rationale.L70 + + + + + +### r-70-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-70-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L71 + + + + + +### r-71-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-71-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L72 + + + + + +### r-72-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-72-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-72-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-72-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L73 + + + + + +### r-73-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-73-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L74 + + + + + +### r-74-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This violates internal consistency. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-74-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L75 + + + + + +### r-75-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-75-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-75-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-75-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L76 + + + + + +### r-76-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-76-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires examination of the support relation. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L77 + + + + + +### r-77-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-68). + +- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-73). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-78). + +- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-87). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-77-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L78 + + + + + +### r-78-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It can be assessed as a value commitment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-78-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L79 + + + + + +### r-79-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It may provide corresponding limited support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-79-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L80 + + + + + +### r-80-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-80-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L81 + + + + + +### r-81-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-81-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These capability definitions come from the application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L82 + + + + + +### r-82-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-82-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L83 + + + + + +### r-83-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the same reliable black box cannot do so. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-83-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L84 + + + + + +### r-84-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-84-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-84-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-84-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L85 + + + + + +### r-85-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-85-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L86 + + + + + +### r-86-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conventional use is not the sole ground. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-86-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L87 + + + + + +### r-87-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-87-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L88 + + + + + +### r-88-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-88-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L89 + + + + + +### r-89-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-89-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L90 + + + + + +### r-90-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Renaming alone adds no support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-90-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L91 + + + + + +### r-struct-91 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-91) + + + + +## rationale.L92 + + + + + +### r-struct-92 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-92) + + + + +## rationale.L93 + + + + + +### r-struct-93 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-93) + + + + +## rationale.L94 + + + + + +### r-94-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-94-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L95 + + + + + +### r-struct-95 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-95) + + + + +## rationale.L96 + + + + + +### r-96-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-96-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L97 + + + + + +### r-struct-97 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-97) + + + + +## rationale.L98 + + + + + +### r-98-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they cannot replace philosophical argument. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-98-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L99 + + + + + +### r-struct-99 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-99) + + + + +## rationale.L100 + + + + + +### r-struct-100 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-100) + + + + +## rationale.L101 + + + + + +### r-struct-101 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-101) + + + + +## rationale.L102 + + + + + +### r-102-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The following are hypothetical applications. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-102-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their conclusions hold within those premises. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L103 + + + + + +### r-struct-103 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-103) + + + + +## rationale.L104 + + + + + +### r-struct-104 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.1 Research Team + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-104) + + + + +## rationale.L105 + + + + + +### r-struct-105 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-105) + + + + +## rationale.L106 + + + + + +### r-struct-106 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-106) + + + + +## rationale.L107 + + + + + +### r-struct-107 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-107) + + + + +## rationale.L108 + + + + + +### r-108-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-108-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-108-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-108-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L109 + + + + + +### r-109-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-109-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the material does not establish population prevalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L110 + + + + + +### r-110-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-110-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L111 + + + + + +### r-111-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-111-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L112 + + + + + +### r-112-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the number of labels alone cannot. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c7) + + + + + + + +### r-112-c8 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c8) + + + + +## rationale.L113 + + + + + +### r-struct-113 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-113) + + + + +## rationale.L114 + + + + + +### r-struct-114 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +### 6.2 Software System + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-114) + + + + +## rationale.L115 + + + + + +### r-struct-115 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-115) + + + + +## rationale.L116 + + + + + +### r-struct-116 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Argument element | Application | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-116) + + + + +## rationale.L117 + + + + + +### r-struct-117 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-117) + + + + +## rationale.L118 + + + + + +### r-118-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Claim +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-118-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-118-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-118-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L119 + + + + + +### r-119-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Additional premises +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-60). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c5 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-31). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-119-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c7) + + + + +## rationale.L120 + + + + + +### r-120-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Inference +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-120-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L121 + + + + + +### r-121-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Counterexample +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c2 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-46). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c3 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。 + +**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c4 · 有限度通过 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。 + +**已检查声明及依赖:** + +- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-54). + +- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-101). + +附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-121-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L122 + + + + + +### r-122-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Conclusion +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-122-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L123 + + + + + +### r-struct-123 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-123) + + + + +## rationale.L124 + + + + + +### r-124-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-124-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c3) + + + + +## rationale.L125 + + + + + +### r-struct-125 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-125) + + + + +## rationale.L126 + + + + + +### r-struct-126 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-126) + + + + +## rationale.L127 + + + + + +### r-struct-127 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-127) + + + + +## rationale.L128 + + + + + +### r-128-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-128-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-128-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-128-c2) + + + + +## rationale.L129 + + + + + +### r-struct-129 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-129) + + + + +## rationale.L130 + + + + + +### r-struct-130 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-130) + + + + +## rationale.L131 + + + + + +### r-struct-131 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +| --- | --- | --- | + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-131) + + + + +## rationale.L132 + + + + + +### r-132-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +English authority with a corresponding Chinese version +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-132-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Another project could select a different language. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L133 + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 表格中的实现名称，没有独立待证明命题。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c6) + + + + + + + +### r-133-v2-c7 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1`. + +**英文源文精确摘录：** + +```text +The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该实现说明子句的 Lean 编码或定理。它作为解释性 rationale 接受审查，不是已证明的哲学义务。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-v2-c7) + + + +## rationale.L134 + + + + + +### r-134-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-134-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L135 + + + + + +### r-135-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +`organon-core-principled-review` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Findings retain their standards and limits; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-135-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L136 + + + + + +### r-136-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +External `grill-me/grilling` +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-136-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L137 + + + + + +### r-137-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A consensus is not proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c5) + + + + + + + +### r-137-c6 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c6) + + + + +## rationale.L138 + + + + + +### r-138-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +These are contextual method requirements. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-138-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L139 + + + + + +### r-139-c1 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c4) + + + + + + + +### r-139-c5 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c5) + + + + +## rationale.L140 + + + + + +### r-struct-140 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-140) + + + + +## rationale.L141 + + + + + +### r-141-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-141-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c4) + + + + +## rationale.L142 + + + + + +### r-struct-142 · 不适用 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text + + +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-142) + + + + +## rationale.L143 + + + + + +### r-143-c1 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c1) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c2 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c2) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c3 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c3) + + + + + + + +### r-143-c4 · 未完成 + + + +**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. + +**英文源文精确摘录:** + +```text +their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. +``` + +**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** + +```text +当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 +``` + +**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 + +[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c4) + + diff --git a/zh/rationale.md b/zh/rationale.md index d9c25ad..acfdc93 100644 --- a/zh/rationale.md +++ b/zh/rationale.md @@ -74,6 +74,7 @@ | 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | | 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | | 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | +| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | | 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | | 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | | 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | @@ -129,7 +130,7 @@ | 已选择的实现 | 情境理由 | 限度及可能替代 | | --- | --- | --- | | 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | +| 以文本为中心的哲学及配套 Lean 工具 | 文本陈述哲学承诺，使其理由和限度可直接审阅。Lean 实现、检查和读者稿提供可复跑的形式化支持。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。工具通过不确立来源保真、充分根据或哲学正确性。Lean 不是普通哲学评估的前置要求。这些工具是在本库目标和约束下可修订的实现选择。 | | `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | | `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | | 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | From 3cca8240817b6d2917c6969e01b1689bde6c883e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: YANG Jingyu Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:22:22 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 6/9] build: freeze shared release tooling --- .gitignore | 4 + AGENTS.md | 4 +- PHILOSOPHY.md | 6 +- README.md | 71 +- assets/banner.svg | 1 + docs/getting-started.md | 47 + docs/understanding.md | 37 + lean/.gitignore | 10 +- lean/README.md | 34 +- lean/VALIDATION.md | 39 +- lean/core-details.md | 3517 ----- lean/core-overview.md | 2857 ---- lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md | 17 - .../philosophy/evidence/audit.lean | 37 - .../evidence/before-migration-kernel.json | 71 - .../before-migration-manuscript-check.json | 942 -- .../philosophy/evidence/kernel.json | 68 - .../philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log | 4 - .../philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log | 49 - .../philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json | 941 -- .../philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean | 176 - lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json | 1429 -- .../reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md | 900 -- .../reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md | 477 - .../reviews/code-informed-update.en.md | 95 - .../reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json | 894 -- .../philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json | 904 -- .../reviews/migration-source-comparison.md | 27 - .../reviews/migration-source-initial.md | 40 - .../reviews/source-comparison-current.md | 28 - .../reviews/source-comparison-initial.md | 34 - .../philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md | 47 - .../philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md | 39 - lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json | 1345 -- .../philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md | 153 - .../PREREGISTERED-original.md | 17 - .../rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md | 5 - .../rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean | 21 - .../evidence/before-migration-kernel.json | 45 - .../before-migration-manuscript-check.json | 2652 ---- .../rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json | 42 - .../evidence/lake-build.log | 4 - .../evidence/lean-audit.log | 32 - .../evidence/manuscript-check.json | 2658 ---- .../leanified/RationaleReader.lean | 105 - .../leanified/lakefile.toml | 5 - .../leanified/lean-toolchain | 1 - .../rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json | 4166 ------ .../reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md | 900 -- .../reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md | 477 - .../reviews/code-informed-update.en.md | 95 - .../reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json | 2630 ---- .../reviews/fidelity.json | 2640 ---- .../reviews/migration-source-comparison.md | 27 - .../reviews/migration-source-initial.md | 40 - .../reviews/source-comparison-current.md | 28 - .../reviews/source-comparison-initial.md | 34 - .../reviews/source-initial.md | 47 - .../reviews/summary.en.md | 31 - .../core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json | 4126 ------ .../snapshots/philosophy.md | 153 - .../rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md | 143 - lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md | 17 - .../core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean | 21 - .../evidence/before-migration-kernel.json | 45 - .../before-migration-manuscript-check.json | 2652 ---- .../rationale/evidence/kernel.json | 42 - .../rationale/evidence/lake-build.log | 4 - .../rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log | 32 - .../rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json | 2653 ---- .../rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean | 105 - .../rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml | 5 - .../rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain | 1 - lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json | 4155 ------ .../rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md | 8501 ----------- .../readers/en/rationale-overview.md | 8724 ----------- .../rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md | 10319 ------------- .../readers/zh/rationale-overview.md | 10542 -------------- .../reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md | 900 -- .../reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md | 477 - .../reviews/code-informed-update.en.md | 95 - .../reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json | 2630 ---- .../rationale/reviews/fidelity.json | 2630 ---- .../reviews/source-comparison-current.md | 28 - .../reviews/source-comparison-initial.md | 34 - .../rationale/reviews/source-initial.md | 47 - .../rationale/reviews/summary.en.md | 31 - lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json | 4119 ------ .../core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md | 143 - .../reader-validation-before-migration.md | 23 - lean/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md | 5 + lean/philosophy/SOURCE-CONTEXT.md | 7 + lean/philosophy/details.md | 12119 ++++++++++++++++ lean/philosophy/evidence/README.md | 5 + lean/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean | 317 + .../evidence/declaration-types.json | 254 + .../evidence/execution-identity.json | 23 + lean/philosophy/evidence/inputs-sha256.json | 14 + lean/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json | 760 + lean/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log | 10 + lean/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log | 554 + .../philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json | 521 + lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean | 1 + .../leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean | 286 + .../leanified/CoreReader/Agency.olean | Bin 0 -> 1358104 bytes .../leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean | 293 + .../leanified/CoreReader/Choice.olean | Bin 0 -> 582952 bytes .../leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean | 848 ++ .../leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.olean | Bin 0 -> 1052112 bytes .../leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean | 607 + .../leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean | 236 + .../leanified/CoreReader/Logic.olean | Bin 0 -> 210448 bytes .../leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean | 427 + .../philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml | 2 +- .../philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain | 0 lean/philosophy/manuscript.json | 653 + lean/philosophy/overview.md | 1158 ++ lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md | 21 + .../blind-source-comparison-initial.md | 504 + .../reviews/blind-targets-initial.json | 1762 +++ .../choice-scope-design-before-code.md | 178 + .../reviews/choice-scope-reconciliation.md | 64 + lean/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.md | 284 + .../reviews/code-comparison-final.md | 110 + .../reviews/code-review-identity.json | 52 + .../reviews/code-source-entries-final.json | 353 + .../reviews/code-targets-final.json | 2731 ++++ lean/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json | 651 + .../reviews/presentation-derivations.json | 114 + .../reviews/source-comparison-final.md | 160 + .../reviews/source-comparison-initial.md | 255 + lean/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md | 304 + .../reviews/source-migration-2026-09-15.md | 19 + .../source-migration-provenance-2026-09-15.md | 9 + .../reviews/source-targets-final.json | 814 ++ .../reviews/source-targets-initial.json | 705 + .../reviews/translation-revision.json | 40 + lean/philosophy/run.json | 1926 +++ .../snapshots/philosophy.md | 6 +- .../philosophy/snapshots/source.md | 0 lean/philosophy/targets.json | 1077 ++ lean/rationale-details.md | 8521 ----------- lean/rationale-overview.md | 8746 ----------- lean/validation/final-node-tests.json | 8 - lean/validation/final-skill-format.json | 8 - lean/validation/final-source-format.json | 28 - lean/validation/final-translator-format.json | 8 - .../hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json | 11 - .../independent-review.md | 5 - .../hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json | 11 - lean/validation/independent-final-review.md | 25 - lean/validation/migration/diff-review.json | 28 - lean/validation/migration/diff-review.md | 41 - .../migration/final-core-tests.json | 11 - .../migration/final-entrypoint-results.json | 27 - ...non-core-lean-natural-language-format.json | 12 - ...nal-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json | 12 - ...-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json | 12 - .../final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json | 12 - .../migration/final-outer-tests.json | 11 - .../validation/migration/final-source-en.json | 13 - .../validation/migration/final-source-zh.json | 13 - .../migration/node-tests-standalone.json | 11 - .../migration/parser-cli-parity.txt | 55 - .../philosophy-current-standalone.json | 14 - .../rationale-current-standalone.json | 14 - .../rationale-history-base-standalone.json | 12 - .../rationale-history-current-standalone.json | 14 - .../migration/skill-actual-results.json | 67 - lean/validation/migration/skill-responses.md | 27 - .../preexisting-management-failure.json | 7 - lean/validation/relocated-philosophy.json | 937 -- lean/validation/relocated-rationale.json | 2647 ---- lean/validation/relocation.json | 32 - maintenance/pages-and-stars.md | 27 + package.json | 23 +- docs/rationale.md => rationale/README.md | 0 scripts/release.mjs | 14 + scripts/site.mjs | 13 + scripts/test.mjs | 12 + site/index.md | 37 + site/public/assets/stars.json | 10 + site/public/assets/stars.svg | 1 + site/site.json | 7 + site/zh/index.md | 37 + skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md | 4 +- .../SKILL.md | 6 +- skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md | 10 + .../references/manuscript-format.md | 8 +- .../references/proof-targets.md | 43 + .../references/run-format.md | 6 + .../scripts/check.js | 46 +- .../scripts/manuscript.js | 19 +- .../scripts/targets.js | 110 + skills/references/validation.md | 2 +- tests/delivery-layout.test.js | 66 + tests/execution-identity.test.js | 72 + tests/lean-checker.test.js | 6 + tests/lean-cli-entrypoint.test.js | 38 + tests/proof-targets.test.js | 291 + tools/site/README.md | 29 + tools/site/build.mjs | 135 + tools/site/check.mjs | 51 + tools/site/package-lock.json | 2837 ++++ tools/site/package.json | 17 + tools/site/test/reader.test.mjs | 37 + tools/site/theme/Layout.vue | 47 + tools/site/theme/index.mjs | 4 + tools/site/theme/style.css | 15 + tools/site/visual.mjs | 109 + zh/AGENTS.md | 6 +- zh/PHILOSOPHY.md | 6 +- zh/README.md | 58 + zh/docs/getting-started.md | 47 + zh/docs/understanding.md | 37 + zh/lean/core-details.md | 4243 ------ zh/lean/core-overview.md | 3583 ----- zh/lean/philosophy/details.md | 12119 ++++++++++++++++ zh/lean/philosophy/overview.md | 1158 ++ zh/lean/rationale-details.md | 10345 ------------- zh/lean/rationale-overview.md | 10570 -------------- zh/maintenance/pages-and-stars.md | 27 + zh/{rationale.md => rationale/README.md} | 6 +- 223 files changed, 49040 insertions(+), 145436 deletions(-) create mode 100644 assets/banner.svg create mode 100644 docs/getting-started.md create mode 100644 docs/understanding.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-details.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-overview.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json delete mode 100644 lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md delete mode 100644 lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/SOURCE-CONTEXT.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/details.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/README.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/declaration-types.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/execution-identity.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/inputs-sha256.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Agency.olean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.olean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.olean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.olean create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean rename lean/{core-v0.1.3 => }/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml (79%) rename lean/{core-v0.1.3 => }/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain (100%) create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/manuscript.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/overview.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-source-comparison-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-targets-initial.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/choice-scope-design-before-code.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/choice-scope-reconciliation.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/code-comparison-final.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/code-review-identity.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/code-source-entries-final.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/code-targets-final.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/presentation-derivations.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-final.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/source-migration-2026-09-15.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/source-migration-provenance-2026-09-15.md create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/source-targets-final.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/source-targets-initial.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/reviews/translation-revision.json create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/run.json rename lean/{core-v0.1.3/rationale => philosophy}/snapshots/philosophy.md (97%) rename lean/{core-v0.1.3 => }/philosophy/snapshots/source.md (100%) create mode 100644 lean/philosophy/targets.json delete mode 100644 lean/rationale-details.md delete mode 100644 lean/rationale-overview.md delete mode 100644 lean/validation/final-node-tests.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/final-skill-format.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/final-source-format.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/final-translator-format.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/independent-review.md delete mode 100644 lean/validation/hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/independent-final-review.md delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/diff-review.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/diff-review.md delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-core-tests.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-entrypoint-results.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-lean-natural-language-format.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-outer-tests.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-source-en.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/final-source-zh.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/node-tests-standalone.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/parser-cli-parity.txt delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/philosophy-current-standalone.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/rationale-current-standalone.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-base-standalone.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/rationale-history-current-standalone.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/skill-actual-results.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/migration/skill-responses.md delete mode 100644 lean/validation/preexisting-management-failure.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/relocated-philosophy.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/relocated-rationale.json delete mode 100644 lean/validation/relocation.json create mode 100644 maintenance/pages-and-stars.md rename docs/rationale.md => rationale/README.md (100%) create mode 100644 scripts/release.mjs create mode 100644 scripts/site.mjs create mode 100644 scripts/test.mjs create mode 100644 site/index.md create mode 100644 site/public/assets/stars.json create mode 100644 site/public/assets/stars.svg create mode 100644 site/site.json create mode 100644 site/zh/index.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/references/proof-targets.md create mode 100644 skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/targets.js create mode 100644 tests/delivery-layout.test.js create mode 100644 tests/execution-identity.test.js create mode 100644 tests/lean-cli-entrypoint.test.js create mode 100644 tests/proof-targets.test.js create mode 100644 tools/site/README.md create mode 100644 tools/site/build.mjs create mode 100644 tools/site/check.mjs create mode 100644 tools/site/package-lock.json create mode 100644 tools/site/package.json create mode 100644 tools/site/test/reader.test.mjs create mode 100644 tools/site/theme/Layout.vue create mode 100644 tools/site/theme/index.mjs create mode 100644 tools/site/theme/style.css create mode 100644 tools/site/visual.mjs create mode 100644 zh/README.md create mode 100644 zh/docs/getting-started.md create mode 100644 zh/docs/understanding.md delete mode 100644 zh/lean/core-details.md delete mode 100644 zh/lean/core-overview.md create mode 100644 zh/lean/philosophy/details.md create mode 100644 zh/lean/philosophy/overview.md delete mode 100644 zh/lean/rationale-details.md delete mode 100644 zh/lean/rationale-overview.md create mode 100644 zh/maintenance/pages-and-stars.md rename zh/{rationale.md => rationale/README.md} (94%) diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e696458..1af29f2 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++ b/.gitignore @@ -37,3 +37,7 @@ htmlcov/ # .local + +node_modules/ + +*.log diff --git a/AGENTS.md b/AGENTS.md index f6db0a2..2ab1507 100644 --- a/AGENTS.md +++ b/AGENTS.md @@ -1,6 +1,6 @@ # Working on Organon Core -Read [PHILOSOPHY.md](PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, before assessing or changing this repository. It is the English authority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) explains the philosophy without adding core obligations. Skills implement context-specific methods and may be revised. +Read [PHILOSOPHY.md](PHILOSOPHY.md), including its meanings and limits, before assessing or changing this repository. It is the English authority. [Rationale](rationale/README.md) explains the philosophy without adding core obligations. Skills implement context-specific methods and may be revised. Product runtime tools have no third-party runtime dependencies. Site building and validation may use locked third-party dependencies, which are excluded from installation packages. For skills applied outside this repository, use [philosophy resolution](skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md) to retain the caller's selected adopted baseline; Core remains the baseline for maintaining this repository. The [document format](skills/references/structure.md) specifies version metadata and stable text-unit IDs as revisable interfaces, not additional philosophical commitments. @@ -28,6 +28,8 @@ Use [organon-core-leanify-prove](skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md) for Before changing philosophy, rationale, source versions, encoded statements, assumptions, or tool/skill behavior that affects evidence, identify the affected source units, declarations, review objects and bilingual manuscripts. Preserve the preceding snapshots and judgments. Content hashes matter even without a version bump; a version number alone cannot establish currentness. Unrelated repository changes do not require fresh semantic review of every proof. +Stable current-object paths do not identify immutable evidence. Before replacement, archive the previous reference closure under ignored `.local/`, including out-of-run reader files, and verify historical replay from a separate copy. The formal Lean delivery contains only current objects and their required evidence; its use and tests must not depend on local history. New execution receipts identify loaded tools and observed runtime versions; they do not establish tool approval. Record the impact of relevant method/tool changes and perform the affected checks without retroactively adding execution identities or new approval to historical records. + Do not declare the affected maintenance complete until required builds, declaration/dependency audits, source-fidelity review and both manuscript granularities in English and Chinese have been synchronized and checked. Reuse unchanged proof or review material only with its exact objects verified and reuse disclosed. Changed source or interpretation needs a new reviewed object; do not merely refresh old expected hashes. Missing tools or independent review leave the dependent stage explicitly incomplete while unrelated work may continue. This completion condition requires accurate evidence and states, not complete formalization or successful proof of every claim. Preserve limited, failed, incomplete, inapplicable and stale results with their reasons. Separate historical replay from current-source approval. [Translation guidance](zh/AGENTS.md#lean-对照稿) preserves those distinctions in Chinese. Ordinary philosophical assessment does not require Lean. diff --git a/PHILOSOPHY.md b/PHILOSOPHY.md index 3705ff1..db7027d 100644 --- a/PHILOSOPHY.md +++ b/PHILOSOPHY.md @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ --- format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.3 -core_version: 0.1.3 +philosophy_version: 0.1.4 +core_version: 0.1.4 derived_from: null --- # Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ derived_from: null This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. -The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](rationale/README.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. ## 1. Charter diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 8c7a1fb..83aa41e 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -1,51 +1,58 @@ -# Organon Core +![OrganonCore](assets/banner.svg) -Organon is a text-centered philosophical core: **Self-Transcendence, Internal Consistency, and Reflexivity**, with **Grounds** constraining judgments and including the additional commitment of **Openness to Alternative Implementations**. Capability definitions belong to applications rather than a uniform core standard. It expresses a position that can constrain judgments and construction across systems; it does not claim that every system already embodies it. +[English](README.md) · [简体中文](zh/README.md) · [Website](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/) · [Releases](https://github.com/shendeguize/OrganonCore/releases) -## Read +# OrganonCore -- [Philosophy](PHILOSOPHY.md) is the current English authority, including the meanings and limits of its provisions. -- [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) explains contributions, dependencies, counterexamples, and applications. It cannot independently add obligations to the core. -- Lean reader editions: [Core overview](lean/core-overview.md) and [line explanations](lean/core-details.md); [rationale overview](lean/rationale-overview.md) and [line explanations](lean/rationale-details.md). [Chinese Core](zh/lean/core-overview.md) and [Chinese rationale](zh/lean/rationale-overview.md) mirror these bounded results. These companion manuscripts report encoding and review limits; they are not philosophical commitments or proof of whole-text correctness. -- Chinese translations are maintained under `zh/` for readability and follow the English authority. -- [Agent guidance](AGENTS.md) identifies how to work on this repository. The skills below are revisable applications under this repository's goals, not additional philosophical truths. -- [Philosophy resolution](skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md) selects the adopted baseline; the [document format](skills/references/structure.md) defines version metadata, stable text-unit IDs, and a revisable starting template. +The philosophy and its review methods. -## Use the skills +## Design Aim · Ground agent judgments and improvements -| Skill | Purpose | Entrypoint | -| --- | --- | --- | -| `organon-core-assess` | Assess an input against the adopted philosophy, including applicability, grounds, conflicts, and minimal correction directions. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-assess/SKILL.md) | -| `organon-core-absorb` | Decide whether input warrants revising the philosophy; develop, review, and implement authorized adoption with necessary synchronization. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-absorb/SKILL.md) | -| `organon-core-principled-review` | Review an object under six principles and stated standards; return findings, including bounded review of the method and criteria. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) | -| `organon-core-wording-review` | Review text for grammatical correctness, precision, ambiguity, terminology, redundancy, and necessary qualifications. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-wording-review/SKILL.md) | -| `organon-core-leanify-prove` | Review source correspondence, check conditional proofs and countermodels, and maintain current evidence. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md) | -| `organon-core-lean-natural-language` | Explain actual Lean definitions and proofs; produce blind translations and bilingual reader editions. | [SKILL.md](skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language/SKILL.md) | +Make commitments, reasons and boundaries readable, assessable and revisable. Organon supplies philosophy and methods; it does not promise correct judgments or automatic improvement. Philosophical adoption retains an explicit human decision. -Give an agent the relevant entrypoint and your input, for example: “Use `organon-core-assess` to assess this design under its stated assumptions,” or “Use `organon-core-absorb` to consider whether this counterexample warrants a change.” These skills use English instructions and respond in the user's language. They can be invoked separately but reference this repository's guidance; copying a skill folder alone does not make a standalone distribution. Load the entrypoint explicitly if the host does not discover this directory; no automatic installation or discovery is assumed. +The philosophy adopts **Self-Transcendence, Internal Consistency and Reflexivity**, with **Grounds** constraining the support and scope of judgments. Its philosophical version is **0.1.4**; product version **1.0.0-rc.1** identifies the installation package and site edition. -For a downstream assessment or absorption, supply the adopted philosophy's path. Assess, absorb, and principled review retain that selection through their shared references and distinguish it from Core's method constraints. Direct Core invocations without a caller selection use the bundled English philosophy. A missing selected file stops the dependent operation without fallback. Wording review remains independent of philosophical lookup. Core's own maintenance continues to use its English authority. +## Start here -Use the real external `grilling` capability, directly or through `grill-me`, when explicitly requested or when material unresolved choices require it. Gather facts before questioning; a fully specified ordinary assessment needs neither dependency lookup nor an interview. When the required capability is unavailable, state which stage is incomplete and continue independent work. Cross-validation requires a different agent’s initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal; missing that capability leaves a provisional result, not completed cross-validation. +```sh +npx --yes @shendeguize/agent-organon@1.0.0-rc.1 install --product core --agent codex --scope project --project /path/to/workspace --version 1.0.0-rc.1 +``` -[Principled review](skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) defines the full-analysis triggers and six dimensions in one place. It distinguishes the object’s own commitments, the selected review standards, and the method’s constraints. Assess uses findings to judge current philosophical compatibility; absorb separately judges reasons for adoption. Method preferences do not automatically establish core conflicts. Both reuse findings when the triggers apply; ordinary narrow assessment keeps targeted checks, and wording-only work does not launch a full cycle. Principled review returns findings without invoking assess or absorb, editing the object, or adopting a revision. Its bounded self-check does not replace independent cross-validation required by absorption. +Release candidate **1.0.0-rc.1** awaits review. Run this command once the public package is available; before publication use a local candidate archive. Requires Node.js 22+. Project and global installation are available; the release matrix records actual validation for the six agent adapters. -`organon-core-wording-review` is a wording tool that can be invoked independently and is used by `organon-core-absorb`. It does not assess requirements, authorization, grounds, validation, philosophy, or bilingual correspondence. `organon-core-assess` retains its own judgment checks without invoking it. Wording review does not replace independent cross-validation. +[Complete quick start: install → check → select philosophy → read-only assessment](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/quick-start) -Ordinary assessment need not trigger absorption. Absorption defaults to a proposal and uses existing explicit authorization for changes; changing philosophical meaning requires the user's explicit decision. See [iteration and review](skills/references/iteration.md) and [validation cases](skills/references/validation.md). +## Read and navigate -When describing adoption of Organon, we recommend identifying the philosophical text, the scope adopted, and the arrangement for receiving updates. Borrowing ideas or adopting selected provisions does not amount to adopting the complete philosophy, including its meanings and conditions of application. A downstream system may retain a fixed text or agree in advance to follow upstream updates; whether an update takes effect depends on that system’s chosen arrangement. These are usage recommendations, not a registration requirement or an additional philosophical commitment. They do not change this repository’s requirement for the user’s explicit decision on changes to philosophical meaning, and an update’s adoption does not establish its correctness. +| Entry | Content | +| --- | --- | +| [AgentOrganon](https://github.com/shendeguize/AgentOrganon) | Workspace skills and management of adopted copies. | +| [OrganonCore](https://github.com/shendeguize/OrganonCore) | Core philosophy, review methods and Lean evidence. | +| [AdvisedOrganons](https://github.com/shendeguize/AdvisedOrganons) | Domain philosophy collection; select a domain explicitly. | +| [Docs](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/understand) | Concepts, operations and capability boundaries for readers. | +| [Philosophy](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/philosophy) | Adopted commitments with their meanings and conditions. | +| [Lean](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/lean) | Claim overviews and paired code with line explanations. | -## Maintain and assess +Release packages contain philosophy, non-Lean skills and required runtime files. Websites, tutorials, Lean projects and evidence remain in source. Rationale is separate from reader documentation and adds no philosophical obligations; maintenance protocols live in maintenance. -The initiating agent coordinates independent skill and documentation maintenance under the shared iteration rules, using the applicable assessment, principled-review, wording, and translation checks. Absorb handles philosophical adoption and the synchronization that decision requires, not general maintenance. -Design, implementation, validation, and revision share a concise record of the object and baseline, objective, grounds, alternatives, assessment, and decision. Repository iteration records stay under ignored `.local/iterations/`; ordinary assessments may stay in the conversation. Only selected, authorized general arguments and cases enter maintained documentation. +## Choose a method -Validation examines actual reasoning and behavior, including justified non-absorption, relevant variations, method revision, cross-system applications, and alternative implementations. File checks establish textual integrity only. Self-assessment, independent review, and agreement do not prove the philosophy or a method universally correct. +| Method | Purpose | +| --- | --- | +| `organon-core-assess` | Assess an input under the selected philosophy. | +| `organon-core-absorb` | Examine reasons for philosophical revision and carry out authorized adoption. | +| `organon-core-principled-review` | Analyze an object under the shared method’s stated standards. | +| `organon-core-wording-review` | Review wording without deciding philosophical adoption. | -The former `ORGANON.md`, checker, fixtures, governance records, and CI were retired together. Their original relative paths and archive hash inventory are retained locally in `.local/archived/to_absorb/legacy-core/`; the archive is ignored and is not included in a fresh clone. Earlier tracked versions remain in Git history. Completed local requirements, discussions, and iteration records are collected under `.local/archived/`, with an index in its `README.md`. +## Star history -Core includes Lean implementations, their checking tools, shared parsing and bilingual reader manuscripts. See [standalone Lean use and evidence](lean/README.md) and [dependency-driven maintenance](AGENTS.md#lean-evidence-maintenance). No automated release mechanism is introduced; checking a model does not establish philosophical correctness. +![Observed total stars for this repository](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/assets/stars.svg) -Licensed under [MIT](LICENSE). +Daily observations begin when collection is enabled. Zero totals, unstars and missing samples are retained; the chart reports its update time. + +## Contribute + +Read the repository’s agent guidance and maintenance protocols before contributing. Mechanical checks, independent review and human adoption decisions have distinct responsibilities. + +MIT · [License](LICENSE) diff --git a/assets/banner.svg b/assets/banner.svg new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a9a0f64 --- /dev/null +++ b/assets/banner.svg @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +OrganonCore — OrganonGround agent judgments and improvements. Philosophy, methods and grounds.PHILOSOPHY · METHODS · GROUNDSOrganonCoreGround agent judgments and improvements.ORGANON / 1.0.0-rc.1 diff --git a/docs/getting-started.md b/docs/getting-started.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f25be39 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/getting-started.md @@ -0,0 +1,47 @@ +# Quick start + +Use Node.js 22 or later and your chosen agent tool. These commands target the published candidate package; before publication, use the local candidate archive route below. + +## 1. Install the methods + +```sh +npx --yes @shendeguize/agent-organon@1.0.0-rc.1 install --product core --agent codex --scope project --project /path/to/workspace --version 1.0.0-rc.1 +``` + +Replace `/path/to/workspace` with your project path. Choose `codex`, `claude`, `cursor`, `copilot`, `gemini` or `opencode` for `--agent`. Start with project installation; use `--scope global` for global installation. Installing methods does not adopt a philosophy. + +## 2. Check installation and discovery + +```sh +npx --yes @shendeguize/agent-organon@1.0.0-rc.1 check --product core --agent codex --scope project --project /path/to/workspace +``` + +Open the agent in that project and confirm the method appears in its skill list or can be loaded explicitly. File checks establish installation integrity; actual tool support is recorded in the candidate’s validation matrix. Resolve reported project/global naming conflicts before continuing. + +## 3. Select a philosophy explicitly + +```sh +npx --yes @shendeguize/agent-organon@1.0.0-rc.1 init --product core --agent codex --scope project --project /path/to/workspace --philosophy core +``` + +Read the preview, confirm the destination and philosophical text, then repeat the command with `--apply --plan-sha256 ` using the exact `planSha256` value in that preview. A changed philosophy or instruction file requires a new preview and decision. An existing philosophy must not be silently replaced; the collection root does not select a domain. Method installation and project adoption are managed separately. + +## 4. Complete a read-only assessment + +Give the agent the actual material you want assessed and ask: + +> Use `organon-core-assess` with this project’s explicitly selected `PHILOSOPHY.md` as the adopted baseline. Assess the material’s grounds, applicability and possible conflicts. Return a read-only report; do not edit files or adopt a proposal. + +Check that the report identifies its baseline, reasons and limits. An assessment does not authorize philosophical revision; missing independent review must remain explicitly incomplete. + +## Offline archives and lifecycle commands + +Download and extract the archive from the corresponding GitHub Release. Every product includes `installer/organon.mjs`, which Node can run directly; only the AgentOrganon npm package registers the `organon` command. + +```sh +node /path/to/extracted/package/installer/organon.mjs install --product core --agent codex --scope project --project /path/to/workspace --from /path/to/shendeguize-organon-core-1.0.0-rc.1.tgz +``` + +The same entrypoint provides `update`, `rollback` and `uninstall`. Check integrity before updating; user modifications or existing-file conflicts stop an update. Uninstall retains user modifications and the adopted project philosophy. + +[Understand the concepts and boundaries](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/understand) · [GitHub Releases](https://github.com/shendeguize/OrganonCore/releases) diff --git a/docs/understanding.md b/docs/understanding.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..5385794 --- /dev/null +++ b/docs/understanding.md @@ -0,0 +1,37 @@ +# Understand Organon + +## Start with three distinct objects + +**Philosophy** states adopted commitments, their meanings and conditions of application. **Skills** apply methods to tasks and remain revisable. **Tools** check and transform files; they do not decide philosophical correctness or reasons for adoption. + +## How an assessment starts + +Identify the actual input and adopted philosophy, then state the question to assess. Examine reasons, conditions and scope; distinguish contradiction from insufficient support. When considering a revision, keep the preceding baseline identifiable. Compatibility does not warrant adoption, and conflict does not by itself defeat reasons for revision. + +## When change is needed + +An ordinary assessment can end with a report. Absorption examines reasons for philosophical revision and implements it after explicit authorization. Wording review concerns expression; file management checks structure and identity. These methods have different responsibilities and do not replace one another’s judgments. + +## A map of the reading material + +- [Philosophy](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/philosophy): commitments, meanings and limits. +- [Rationale](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/rationale): arguments, alternatives and objections; no additional philosophical obligations. +- [Lean reader](https://shendeguize.github.io/OrganonCore/lean): begin with claims, premises and boundaries, then inspect declarations and line explanations. +- Maintenance protocols: review, validation and release procedures for maintainers, in the repository’s `maintenance/` directory. + +## What Lean can establish + +Lean checks formal conclusions under given definitions and assumptions. Target `accepted`, kernel `passed` and source fidelity are different judgments; `limited`, `incomplete` and `not_applicable` retain their recorded meanings. Defining a duty does not show its fulfillment; a finite model does not establish universal real-world correctness. Readers unfamiliar with Lean can start with the claim overview and consult the paired code and explanation pages one line at a time. + +## Installation and adoption are separate + +Project installation supplies method entrypoints for that project; global installation supplies user-level entrypoints. Neither adopts a philosophy automatically. A project selects its baseline through explicit initialization; updating, rolling back or uninstalling methods does not automatically change that decision. A domain collection requires an explicit domain choice. + +## Choose a method + +| Method | Purpose | +| --- | --- | +| `organon-core-assess` | Assess an input under the selected philosophy. | +| `organon-core-absorb` | Examine reasons for philosophical revision and carry out authorized adoption. | +| `organon-core-principled-review` | Analyze an object under the shared method’s stated standards. | +| `organon-core-wording-review` | Review wording without deciding philosophical adoption. | diff --git a/lean/.gitignore b/lean/.gitignore index bc9968e..9b73095 100644 --- a/lean/.gitignore +++ b/lean/.gitignore @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ -core-v0.1.3/*/evidence/checks/ -core-v0.1.3/*/leanified/.lake/ -core-v0.1.3/*/leanified/lake-manifest.json -!core-v0.1.3/*/evidence/lean-audit.log -!core-v0.1.3/*/evidence/lake-build.log +**/evidence/checks/ +**/leanified/.lake/ +**/leanified/lake-manifest.json +!**/evidence/lean-audit.log +!**/evidence/lake-build.log diff --git a/lean/README.md b/lean/README.md index 7128b59..add3cdb 100644 --- a/lean/README.md +++ b/lean/README.md @@ -1,34 +1,36 @@ # Lean implementations and reader editions -Core owns the Lean projects, evidence, checkers and two skills. This repository can be copied or cloned on its own; an outer AgentOrganon checkout is not required. The English [philosophy](../PHILOSOPHY.md) remains authoritative. Implementations and skills are revisable support for its study, not additional philosophical commitments. +Core owns its Lean project, checkers and two skills and works without AgentOrganon. The English [philosophy](../PHILOSOPHY.md) is authoritative. Formal definitions, conditional results, finite examples and reader explanations add no philosophical commitments. -## Read and inspect +## Current object -| Source | English | Chinese | Current run and exact Lean code | +| Source | English | Chinese | Run and code | | --- | --- | --- | --- | -| Philosophy 0.1.3, all 22 units | [Overview](core-overview.md), [line explanations](core-details.md) | [Overview](../zh/lean/core-overview.md), [line explanations](../zh/lean/core-details.md) | [Run](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json), [CoreReader.lean](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean) | -| Rationale with the Core-tooling design explanation | [Overview](rationale-overview.md), [line explanations](rationale-details.md) | [Overview](../zh/lean/rationale-overview.md), [line explanations](../zh/lean/rationale-details.md) | [Run](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json), [RationaleReader.lean](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean) | +| Philosophy 0.1.4 | [Overview](philosophy/overview.md), [details](philosophy/details.md) | [速览](../zh/lean/philosophy/overview.md), [详解](../zh/lean/philosophy/details.md) | [Manifest](philosophy/manuscript.json), [CoreReader.lean](philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean) | -The current 495 navigation entries report 14 limited correspondences, 2 rejected correspondences, 371 incomplete entries and 108 structural or inapplicable entries. Zero complete source claims are reported passed. These counts are not a philosophical quality score. The revised rationale row adds one inventory clause; no proof or fidelity grade was upgraded. All 228 nonblank Lean lines retain English and Chinese explanations. +The [frozen catalog](philosophy/targets.json) retains 28 targets, 62 prescribed declarations and all 33 source paragraphs. One supplementary application-variation case brings the checked inventory to 63 declarations. The two empty headings remain structural entries. Targets distinguish specifications, conditional theorems, satisfiability, non-entailment and nonformal boundaries. Completing this catalog does not mean that all source paragraphs are unconditionally true or completely formalized. + +The overview follows complete claims and their conditions. The details contain the exact complete Lean sources and explanations of every nonblank line in both languages. [Review records](philosophy/reviews/README.md) distinguish the preserved source-first and code-blind initial assessments from later informed comparisons and explain changed judgments. [Validation](VALIDATION.md) provides actual check evidence and its limits. + +The stable `philosophy/` path identifies the current object, not immutable evidence. Source, run, code, actual declaration types, review and manuscript hashes identify the objects checked. [Source context](philosophy/SOURCE-CONTEXT.md) explains the frozen source's original relative links. ## Standalone use -Use [organon-core-leanify-prove](../skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md) and [organon-core-lean-natural-language](../skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language/SKILL.md) by their entrypoints. They accept ordinary input as well as Organon text. Preserve the caller's explicit adopted baseline; direct Core invocation uses the existing [selection contract](../skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md). Code-only explanation does not require a philosophical baseline. Language and `--explain-lines` are skill inputs, not a translation executable. +Use [organon-core-leanify-prove](../skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/SKILL.md) for formalization and [organon-core-lean-natural-language](../skills/organon-core-lean-natural-language/SKILL.md) for code explanation and manuscripts. These are agent entrypoints, not installed executables. Preserve a caller-selected baseline under the [selection contract](../skills/references/philosophy-resolution.md); code-only explanation requires no philosophy. Language and `--explain-lines` are skill inputs. -With Node >=22, RTK, and the already installed `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1` toolchain, run from the Core root: +With Node >=22, RTK and installed Lean `v4.33.1`, run from Core: ```sh -rtk proxy node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy --manuscript manuscript.json -rtk proxy node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools --manuscript manuscript.json -rtk proxy node --test +rtk proxy node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/philosophy --manuscript manuscript.json +rtk proxy node --test tests/*.test.js ``` -Omit `--manuscript manuscript.json` to check only a run's frozen sources, build, declarations, cases and dependencies. The manuscript option also binds current source/baseline, both languages and both granularities, exact excerpts and reported review objects. It does not certify source fidelity, reviewer independence or translation accuracy. No third-party Node packages or Mathlib are required; the checker does not install or silently change the toolchain. +Omitting `--manuscript manuscript.json` checks the frozen source, build, declarations, cases and dependencies. Manuscript checking additionally verifies current-source bindings, exact excerpts, the frozen target catalog, actual type hashes and reported review/status constraints across both languages and granularities. It does not certify semantic fidelity, translation accuracy, reviewer independence or philosophical correctness. No Mathlib, third-party Node dependency or automatic toolchain installation is used. -## Maintenance and history +New checks write receipts beneath ignored `evidence/checks/`. They identify loaded checker/parser bytes and observed Node/Lean/Lake versions; this does not authenticate or approve an implementation. Historical records without receipts remain records without known execution identity. -Follow [Lean evidence maintenance](../AGENTS.md#lean-evidence-maintenance) when actual source, code, assumption or method/tool dependencies change. Current checks and bilingual synchronization are completion conditions; successful proof of every philosophical claim is not. Hash changes matter without a philosophy-version change. Philosophy 0.1.3 is unchanged; the revised rationale has a new source hash and a separate run. +## History and maintenance -The [preceding rationale run](core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json) and its [English historical reader](core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md) / [Chinese historical reader](core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md) remain available. Its frozen kernel evidence can be replayed with the base command. Its manuscript check deliberately fails as stale against the current rationale. Original source/code/review objects are retained; relocation changes paths and reader hashes, not what historical proofs established. Earlier check results prefixed `before-migration-` are historical, not certification of the new layout. +Formal delivery contains the current philosophy object and its necessary evidence. The preceding philosophy and rationale runs and reader views are archived under ignored `.local/lean-history/` on the maintaining machine. Rationale remains explanatory source text, without a separate current proof assignment. Clones, ordinary copies and current tests do not depend on local archives. -Current run reviews distinguish initial source assessment, unchanged code backtranslation reused by exact hash, and informed migration comparison. The two rejected support/grounds mappings remain rejected. [Migration validation](VALIDATION.md) reports actual standalone and compatibility results; [preceding validation](history/reader-validation-before-migration.md) retains the earlier task's results. Private iteration records and caches are not part of the portable delivery. No global installation, release workflow or remote publication is implied. +Before replacing a current object, preserve the preceding source/run/code/review/view closure and verify historical replay from a separate copy. Follow [dependency-driven maintenance](../AGENTS.md#lean-evidence-maintenance): review affected objects, disclose reuse and prior exposure, and synchronize both languages. A stable path or unchanged version number does not keep old approval current. Ordinary philosophical assessment does not require Lean. diff --git a/lean/VALIDATION.md b/lean/VALIDATION.md index 009b57c..b087a13 100644 --- a/lean/VALIDATION.md +++ b/lean/VALIDATION.md @@ -1,33 +1,18 @@ -# Core Lean migration validation +# Current Lean checks -Actual local validation dated 2026-09-13. Core now contains the implementation and can run without the outer repository. This record describes migration and evidence integrity, not completion of philosophical formalization. English and Chinese philosophy texts remain byte-identical at version 0.1.3; the rationale implementation row has a new source object. +Run from the Core root with Node >=22, RTK and installed Lean `v4.33.1`: -## Hash-baseline repair follow-up +```sh +rtk proxy node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js lean/philosophy --manuscript manuscript.json +rtk proxy node --test tests/*.test.js +``` -After the user requested repair, the two fixed expectations in the outer management test were updated to the independently verified, previously approved bilingual Core 0.1.3 bodies. The source text, normalization algorithm and remaining assertions were unchanged. [Independent review](validation/hash-baseline-followup/independent-review.md) also checked that subsequent body mutations still fail the fixed-hash guard. +The first command builds the current project, audits every registered declaration and case, saves actual full declaration types, and checks current-source bindings and all four reader views. The second checks Core's runtime and delivery behavior, including retention of the frozen target catalog and rejection of source drift. New checks write execution records under ignored `evidence/checks/`. -Fresh full runs now pass: **Core 53/53** ([output](validation/hash-baseline-followup/core-tests.json)) and **outer 87/87** ([output](validation/hash-baseline-followup/outer-tests.json)), with zero skips. Both current Lean manuscript checks also pass. The migration-time failure and its raw outputs below are retained as historical evidence; they are not the current test status. +| Current object | Selected evidence | +| --- | --- | +| Philosophy | [Kernel](philosophy/evidence/kernel.json), [manuscript](philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json), [actual declaration types](philosophy/evidence/declaration-types.json), [execution identity](philosophy/evidence/execution-identity.json), [context](philosophy/evidence/README.md) | -## Migration-time results before the repair +These records bind exact inputs. Successful checking does not establish philosophical correctness or actual-world fulfillment of an adopted duty. Target acceptance is separate from a source paragraph's partial correspondence and from empirical/value adequacy. [Independent review records](philosophy/reviews/README.md) preserve initial objections, corrections, exposure and final scope. -| Check | Actual result | Evidence | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Core `rtk proxy node --test` | 53 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped | [Full output](validation/migration/final-core-tests.json) | -| Outer `rtk proxy node --test` | 86 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped | [Full output](validation/migration/final-outer-tests.json) | -| Current philosophy and rationale runs, Core and outer entrypoints | Build/audit/manuscript pass; results identical apart from generated evidence locations | [Entrypoint results](validation/migration/final-entrypoint-results.json) | -| Core-only ordinary copy, both current manuscripts | Pass, current source and baseline; 18/10 declarations, 123/372 entries | [Philosophy](validation/migration/philosophy-current-standalone.json), [rationale](validation/migration/rationale-current-standalone.json) | -| Core-only ordinary copy, all Core tests | 53 passed, 0 failed, 0 skipped | [Full output](validation/migration/node-tests-standalone.json) | -| Historical rationale in ordinary copy | Frozen kernel passes; current manuscript is rejected as stale while kernel remains valid | [Base](validation/migration/rationale-history-base-standalone.json), [currentness](validation/migration/rationale-history-current-standalone.json) | -| Both source-format checks | Pass, 22 matching units | [English](validation/migration/final-source-en.json), [Chinese](validation/migration/final-source-zh.json) | -| Four Core/outer skill formats | Pass | [Core proof](validation/migration/final-organon-core-leanify-prove-format.json), [Core translation](validation/migration/final-organon-core-lean-natural-language-format.json), [outer proof](validation/migration/final-organon-leanify-prove-format.json), [outer translation](validation/migration/final-organon-lean-natural-language-format.json) | -| Independent source, method, wording and bilingual difference review | No unresolved actionable finding within reviewed scope; initial and informed stages distinguished | [Final review](validation/migration/diff-review.md), [initial source review](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md), [informed comparison](core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md) | - -At migration time, the outer suite was **not green**. Its then-unchanged management test expected an older philosophy-body hash; the same failure was reproduced before this migration and is retained in the [preceding validation](history/reader-validation-before-migration.md). No test expectation or philosophy text was changed during that migration stage; the justified follow-up above corrects only the stale expectations. - -The [recorded parser/CLI comparison](validation/migration/parser-cli-parity.txt) shows the shared parser was compared with the frozen original on 22 variants, including malformed input, CR/CRLF, whitespace, direct bodies, structure, rendering and Extensions behavior. Twelve original/Core/outer CLI checks on the original frozen packages produced matching results. Subsequent current-package checks above separately validate the new layout and revised rationale. The forwarding APIs retain their exported functions and old CLI usage behavior; outer `coreWarnings` retains its configuration source. - -[Independent actual skill use](validation/migration/skill-responses.md), with [command results](validation/migration/skill-actual-results.json), covered a two-clause ordinary source, a Lean-only premise projection, an explicit downstream baseline and an invalid explicit path. A first attempt with no declaration inventory was rejected and preserved. A later conditional interface passed mechanical checking while its source fidelity remained incomplete. The identity example returned its assumed premise; it was not presented as an independent proof of that premise. The explicit downstream version was retained; missing explicit selection did not fall back to Core. These are bounded behavior observations, not proof of general agent capability. - -The current corpus has 14 limited correspondences, 2 rejected correspondences, 371 incomplete entries and 108 structural/inapplicable entries: **zero complete source claims are marked passed**. The revised rationale row replaces six inventory clauses with seven, with no theorem mappings or promoted grades. Unchanged code explanations are explicitly reused, not newly blind-reviewed. Original fidelity records are retained as `fidelity-before-migration.json`; original source/code/initial-review bytes are preserved. - -All checker outputs retain `semantic_status: not_evaluated`. Binding checks do not establish semantic fidelity, independent authorship or accurate translation. Source correspondence failures remain modeling findings, not proofs that the philosophy is false. Migration completion does not imply full formalization. No global installation, push or remote publication was performed. +Private iteration logs, preceding deliveries and ordinary-copy reports remain under ignored `.local/`. They are not dependencies of the formal delivery. The selected per-run records above remain with their current object; rerunning checks does not rewrite them automatically. diff --git a/lean/core-details.md b/lean/core-details.md deleted file mode 100644 index 7f26e92..0000000 --- a/lean/core-details.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,3517 +0,0 @@ -# Core — Lean line explanations - -Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59`. [Frozen source](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](core-overview.md). - -These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. - -No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. - -Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'incomplete': 107, 'not_applicable': 7, 'limited': 7, 'failed': 2}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. - - -## organon.preamble - - - - - -### c-10-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-10-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-12-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-12-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The charter and Grounds constrain one another; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-12-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-12-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter - - - - - -### organon.charter · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## organon.charter.overview - - - - - -### c-22-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-22-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-24-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-24-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The provisions below specify the conditions for each. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence - - - - - -### c-29-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-29-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation - - - - - -### c-34-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-34-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-34-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality - - - - - -### c-39-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-39-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-39-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These remain within the scope of possible change; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-39-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits - - - - - -### c-44-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-44-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-44-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-46-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-46-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-47-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-48-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-48-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-49-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-49-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.consistency - - - - - -### c-54-c1 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.Consistent` — [CoreReader.lean:81](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L81); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-81). - - -```lean -def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := - ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) -``` - -- `CoreReader.joint_conflict` — [CoreReader.lean:87](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-87). - - -```lean -theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by - intro h - exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - -## organon.charter.consistency.meaning - - - - - -### c-59-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-59-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set` — [CoreReader.lean:94](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L94); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-94). - - -```lean -theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by - intro context h - simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### c-59-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-59-c4 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.ChangeReported` — [CoreReader.lean:111](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L111); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-111). - - -```lean -def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := - before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false -``` - -- `CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report` — [CoreReader.lean:117](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L117); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-117). - - -```lean -theorem changed_set_needs_report : - ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by - unfold ChangeReported - decide -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### c-61-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-61-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.distinct_contexts` — [CoreReader.lean:101](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-101). - - -```lean -theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by - intro context h - have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 - have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn - cases impossible -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### c-61-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.consistency.limits - - - - - -### c-66-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-66-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-67-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-67-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.reflexivity - - - - - -### c-72-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning - - - - - -### c-77-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-77-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-77-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.charter.reflexivity.limits - - - - - -### c-82-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-82-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-82-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-83-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-application does not constitute self-proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-83-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself. - -**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Passing the system's own finite test implies its owned principle is correct at every natural input. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness` — [CoreReader.lean:167](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L167); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-167). - - -```lean -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by - constructor - · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [sampleSystem] at bad -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### c-84-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.grounds - - - - - -### c-89-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-89-c2 · Failed correspondence - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.ObservationComplete` — [CoreReader.lean:125](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L125); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-125). - - -```lean -def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed -``` - -- `CoreReader.observation_gap` — [CoreReader.lean:130](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L130); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-130). - - -```lean -theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by - intro h - have h2 := h 2 - simp at h2 -``` - -- `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:138](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L138); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-138). - - -```lean -theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := - ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ -``` - -- `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:145](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L145); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-145). - - -```lean -theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by - refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ - intro h - have bad := h 1 - cases bad -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - -## organon.grounds.assessment - - - - - -### c-94-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-94-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-94-c3 · Failed correspondence - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:58](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L58); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-58). - - -```lean -theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.1 -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### c-94-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-94-c5 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.Duties` — [CoreReader.lean:9](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L9); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-9). - - -```lean -def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect -``` - -- `CoreReader.mixed_projection` — [CoreReader.lean:29](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L29); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-29). - - -```lean -theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : - e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ -``` - -- `CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture` — [CoreReader.lean:43](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L43); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-43). - - -```lean -theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by - intro k hk - exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ -``` - -- `CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:50](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L50); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-50). - - -```lean -theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.2 -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### c-94-c6 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive` — [CoreReader.lean:36](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L36); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-36). - - -```lean -theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : - Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl -``` - -- `CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:66](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L66); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-66). - - -```lean -theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := - empirical_only_rejected -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### c-98-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Empirical claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### c-98-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-98-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-99-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Inferential claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### c-99-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-99-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-100-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Value commitment -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### c-100-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-100-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-102-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-102-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-102-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-102-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.grounds.scope - - - - - -### c-107-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-107-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-107-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-109-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Measurement can make some differences comparable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-109-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-109-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-109-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-111-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-111-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.grounds.capabilities - - - - - -### c-116-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-116-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-116-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-118-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-118-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-118-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-118-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-118-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.grounds.implementations - - - - - -### c-123-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-123-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-125-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-125-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-125-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.grounds.implementations.limits - - - - - -### c-130-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-131-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-131-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-132-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-132-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-133-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-133-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Relevant reasons may still give it priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.relationships - - - - - -### organon.relationships · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## organon.relationships.roles - - - - - -### c-141-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-141-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-141-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-141-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-141-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Each commitment needs its own reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-143-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-143-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-143-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-143-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-143-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-145-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-145-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-145-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-145-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-145-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## organon.relationships.terms - - - - - -### c-152-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Existing form -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### c-152-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### c-153-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### c-153-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - - - - - - - -### c-153-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -not limited to executable tests. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## Complete checked code and line explanations - -Code SHA256: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803`. The initial translation was saved before source comparison; the current code revision below has an explicitly informed update. - - -```lean -namespace CoreReader - -inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value - deriving DecidableEq - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect - -def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - Duties applicable examined claim grounds - -def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.mixed_projection -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : - e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : - Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by - intro k hk - exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.2 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.1 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := - empirical_only_rejected - -inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo - deriving DecidableEq - -def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := - (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ - (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ - (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ - (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent -organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 --/ -def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := - ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.joint_conflict -organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 --/ -theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by - intro h - exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by - intro context h - simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.distinct_contexts -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-61-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by - intro context h - have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 - have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn - cases impossible - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.ChangeReported -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := - before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -theorem changed_set_needs_report : - ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by - unfold ChangeReported - decide - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.ObservationComplete -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.observation_gap -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by - intro h - have h2 := h 2 - simp at h2 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := - ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by - refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ - intro h - have bad := h 1 - cases bad - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -structure SelfAssessingSystem where - ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool - samples : List Nat - -def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := - s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple - -def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := - ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness -organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc --/ -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by - constructor - · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [sampleSystem] at bad - -end CoreReader -``` - - - - - **L1** Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. - - - - **L3** Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. - - - - **L4** Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. - - - - **L6** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L7** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L8** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L9** Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - - - - **L10** Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. - - - - **L11** Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. - - - - **L13** Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. - - - - **L14** Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. - - - - **L15** Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. - - - - **L17** Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - - - - **L18** It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. - - - - **L20** Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - - - - **L21** It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. - - - - **L23** Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - - - - **L24** It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. - - - - **L26** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L27** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L28** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L29** Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. - - - - **L30** Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. - - - - **L31** Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. - - - - **L33** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L34** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L35** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L36** Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. - - - - **L37** Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. - - - - **L38** Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. - - - - **L40** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L41** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L42** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L43** State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. - - - - **L44** Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. - - - - **L45** Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. - - - - **L47** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L48** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L49** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L50** State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. - - - - **L51** Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. - - - - **L52** Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. - - - - **L53** Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. - - - - **L55** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L56** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L57** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L58** State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. - - - - **L59** Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. - - - - **L60** Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. - - - - **L61** Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. - - - - **L63** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L64** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L65** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L66** State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. - - - - **L67** Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. - - - - **L69** Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. - - - - **L70** Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. - - - - **L72** Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. - - - - **L73** The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. - - - - **L74** The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. - - - - **L75** A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. - - - - **L76** The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. - - - - **L78** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L79** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L80** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L81** Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. - - - - **L82** Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. - - - - **L84** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L85** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L86** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L87** State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. - - - - **L88** Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. - - - - **L89** Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. - - - - **L91** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L92** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L93** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L94** State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. - - - - **L95** For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. - - - - **L96** Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. - - - - **L98** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L99** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L100** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L101** State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. - - - - **L102** Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. - - - - **L103** Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. - - - - **L104** Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. - - - - **L105** Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. - - - - **L106** Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. - - - - **L108** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L109** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L110** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L111** Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. - - - - **L112** Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. - - - - **L114** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L115** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L116** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L117** Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. - - - - **L118** State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. - - - - **L119** Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. - - - - **L120** Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. - - - - **L122** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L123** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L124** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L125** Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. - - - - **L127** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L128** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L129** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L130** State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. - - - - **L131** Assume completeness for contradiction. - - - - **L132** Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. - - - - **L133** Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. - - - - **L135** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L136** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L137** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L138** Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. - - - - **L139** State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. - - - - **L140** Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. - - - - **L142** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L143** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L144** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L145** Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. - - - - **L146** State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. - - - - **L147** Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. - - - - **L148** Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. - - - - **L149** Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. - - - - **L150** Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. - - - - **L152** Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. - - - - **L154** Declare SelfAssessingSystem as a record with a stored Boolean-valued natural-number predicate and a sample list; no invariant relates the fields. - - - - **L155** Declare ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool, an arbitrary Boolean-valued function stored in the system record. The field name alone does not establish authorship, ownership, or philosophical status. - - - - **L156** Declare samples as a finite list of natural numbers, possibly empty or containing duplicates; no completeness or selection requirement is imposed. - - - - **L158** Define runOwnAssessment as a Boolean-valued function of the whole SelfAssessingSystem record. - - - - **L159** Run List.all over the stored samples using that same record's ownPrinciple function. The result is true exactly when every listed input evaluates to true; on an empty list it is true. This is an actual finite Boolean computation, not a supplied proposition. - - - - **L161** Begin the concrete sampleSystem record definition. - - - - **L162** Store the function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n on Nat and the singleton sample list [1]. decide converts each decidable arithmetic proposition into a Boolean. This duplicates the expression in proposedPrinciple but does not reference that definition. - - - - **L164** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L165** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L166** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L167** Begin the theorem contrasting this system's finite assessment result with all-input satisfaction of its stored function. - - - - **L168** State that runOwnAssessment returns true on sampleSystem, while it is false that every natural number makes the same sampleSystem.ownPrinciple return true. The universal n is inferred as Nat. - - - - **L169** Split the conjunction into the computed assessment equality and the negated universal function equality. - - - - **L170** For the first conjunct, unfold runOwnAssessment and sampleSystem to List.all on [1] using the equation-deciding function. - - - - **L171** Compute the singleton assessment: the equation holds at 1, so the all result equals true. - - - - **L172** For the second conjunct, assume the stored Boolean function returns true at every natural number. - - - - **L173** Instantiate that universal Boolean equality at 0. - - - - **L174** Unfold sampleSystem and simplify: the equation at 0 is false, so the hypothesis asserts false = true and yields a contradiction. - - - - **L176** Close the CoreReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-overview.md b/lean/core-overview.md deleted file mode 100644 index 2672758..0000000 --- a/lean/core-overview.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2857 +0,0 @@ -# Core — claim overview - -Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59`. [Frozen source](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](core-details.md). - -These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. - -No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. - -Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'incomplete': 107, 'not_applicable': 7, 'limited': 7, 'failed': 2}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. - - -## organon.preamble - - - - - -### c-10-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-10-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-10-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-10-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-12-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-12-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The charter and Grounds constrain one another; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-12-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-12-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-12-c4) - - - - -## organon.charter - - - - - -### organon.charter · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#organon.charter) - - - - -## organon.charter.overview - - - - - -### c-22-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-22-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-22-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-22-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-24-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-24-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-24-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The provisions below specify the conditions for each. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-24-c2) - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence - - - - - -### c-29-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-29-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-29-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-29-c2) - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation - - - - - -### c-34-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-34-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-34-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-34-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-34-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-34-c3) - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality - - - - - -### c-39-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-39-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-39-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These remain within the scope of possible change; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-39-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-39-c4) - - - - -## organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits - - - - - -### c-44-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-44-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-44-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-44-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-44-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-44-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-46-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-46-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-46-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-46-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-47-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-47-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-48-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-48-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-48-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-48-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-49-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-49-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-49-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-49-c2) - - - - -## organon.charter.consistency - - - - - -### c-54-c1 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.Consistent` — [CoreReader.lean:81](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L81); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-81). - -- `CoreReader.joint_conflict` — [CoreReader.lean:87](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-87). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-54-c1) - - - - -## organon.charter.consistency.meaning - - - - - -### c-59-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-59-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set` — [CoreReader.lean:94](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L94); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-94). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-59-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-59-c4 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.ChangeReported` — [CoreReader.lean:111](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L111); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-111). - -- `CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report` — [CoreReader.lean:117](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L117); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-117). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-59-c4) - - - - - - - -### c-61-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-61-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-61-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.distinct_contexts` — [CoreReader.lean:101](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-101). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-61-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-61-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-61-c3) - - - - -## organon.charter.consistency.limits - - - - - -### c-66-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-66-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-66-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-66-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-67-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-67-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-67-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-67-c2) - - - - -## organon.charter.reflexivity - - - - - -### c-72-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-72-c1) - - - - -## organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning - - - - - -### c-77-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-77-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-77-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-77-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-77-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-77-c3) - - - - -## organon.charter.reflexivity.limits - - - - - -### c-82-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-82-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-82-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-82-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-82-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-82-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-83-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-application does not constitute self-proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-83-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-83-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself. - -**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Passing the system's own finite test implies its owned principle is correct at every natural input. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness` — [CoreReader.lean:167](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L167); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-167). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-83-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-84-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-84-c1) - - - - -## organon.grounds - - - - - -### c-89-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-89-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-89-c2 · Failed correspondence - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.ObservationComplete` — [CoreReader.lean:125](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L125); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-125). - -- `CoreReader.observation_gap` — [CoreReader.lean:130](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L130); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-130). - -- `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:138](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L138); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-138). - -- `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion` — [CoreReader.lean:145](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L145); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-145). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-89-c2) - - - - -## organon.grounds.assessment - - - - - -### c-94-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-94-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-94-c3 · Failed correspondence - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `rejected`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:58](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L58); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-58). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-94-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c4) - - - - - - - -### c-94-c5 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.Duties` — [CoreReader.lean:9](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L9); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-9). - -- `CoreReader.mixed_projection` — [CoreReader.lean:29](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L29); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-29). - -- `CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture` — [CoreReader.lean:43](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L43); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-43). - -- `CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:50](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L50); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-50). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c5) - - - - - - - -### c-94-c6 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive` — [CoreReader.lean:36](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L36); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-36). - -- `CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected` — [CoreReader.lean:66](core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean#L66); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](core-details.md#line-66). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-94-c6) - - - - - - - -### c-98-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Empirical claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-98-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-98-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-98-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-98-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-98-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-99-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Inferential claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-99-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-99-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-99-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-99-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-99-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-100-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Value commitment -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-100-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-100-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-100-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-100-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-100-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-102-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-102-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-102-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-102-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-102-c4) - - - - -## organon.grounds.scope - - - - - -### c-107-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-107-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-107-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-107-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-107-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-107-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-109-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Measurement can make some differences comparable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-109-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-109-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-109-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-109-c4) - - - - - - - -### c-111-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-111-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-111-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-111-c2) - - - - -## organon.grounds.capabilities - - - - - -### c-116-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-116-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-116-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-116-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-116-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-116-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-118-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-118-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-118-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-118-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c4) - - - - - - - -### c-118-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-118-c5) - - - - -## organon.grounds.implementations - - - - - -### c-123-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-123-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-123-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-123-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-125-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-125-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-125-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-125-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-125-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-125-c3) - - - - -## organon.grounds.implementations.limits - - - - - -### c-130-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-130-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-131-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-131-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-131-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-131-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-132-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-132-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-132-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-132-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-133-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-133-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-133-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Relevant reasons may still give it priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-133-c2) - - - - -## organon.relationships - - - - - -### organon.relationships · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#organon.relationships) - - - - -## organon.relationships.roles - - - - - -### c-141-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-141-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-141-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-141-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c4) - - - - - - - -### c-141-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Each commitment needs its own reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-141-c5) - - - - - - - -### c-143-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-143-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-143-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-143-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c4) - - - - - - - -### c-143-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-143-c5) - - - - - - - -### c-145-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-145-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-145-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c3) - - - - - - - -### c-145-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c4) - - - - - - - -### c-145-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-145-c5) - - - - -## organon.relationships.terms - - - - - -### c-152-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Existing form -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-152-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-152-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-152-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-153-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-153-c1) - - - - - - - -### c-153-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-153-c2) - - - - - - - -### c-153-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -not limited to executable tests. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](core-details.md#c-153-c3) - - diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md deleted file mode 100644 index a65a742..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -# New compact models — registered before Lean authoring - -These are new bounded encodings for readable evidence, not unchanged replays of all older projects. Historical Core/Rationale models remain untouched; unretained results do not silently become current results. Inventory all original content, map only explicit selected fragments. No whole philosophical text is expected to be proved. - -Core fragments: responsibility quantified over actual applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, independently of labels; domain relation supplied and not self-validating. Preserve empirical/value mixed applicability via concrete claim-aspect fixture and wrong-grounds/reported-label variants. The full articulation, basis quality, proportionality, value criticism and all listed empirical/inferential duties remain unmodeled by this narrower interface; do not label whole Assessment passed. Separate sufficient support from truth using a finite observation set with an explicitly stated universal-coverage sufficiency criterion for all natural inputs; bounded observations cannot establish a universal property, whether the property is actually true or false. - -Consistency: whole held-set input to an explicit consequence relation, context/question/polarity; a concrete P, P→Q, ¬Q fixture uses a registered one-step consequence for this case, not a general logical calculus. Joint inconsistency, removal of ¬Q, and opposite judgments under distinct contexts get actual probes. A separate changed-content reporting obligation is an interface, not an assertion a real change was reported. - -Reflexivity: concrete arithmetic principle n+1=2*n checked on sample1 can pass while counterexample0 refutes it; evaluating oneself is a separate recorded action. This supplies a relevant finite counterexample to self-assessment alone implying correctness, not a general diagnosis of every system or proof that the normative provision is obeyed. - -Rationale R1: actual conditional identity theorem h:P⊢P plus a true coded arithmetic claim and false different prose claim; exact arithmetic counterexample illustrates that a proof of one statement does not prove a different stronger statement. Missing bridge is a modeling finding, not proof that philosophical commitments fail. It is an illustration of the accepted R1 row, never a mathematical proof of every prose correspondence judgment. - -Rationale software/L119: ServiceState contains acknowledged and cached natural values; direct read reads acknowledged, cache reads cached; updateOnly changes acknowledged and retains cached. Initial10/10, original latencies5/2,budget6 both acceptable; update11 yields11/10. Original-match plus later-mismatch witnesses failure of global equivalence. Positive invalidating update sets both11; unchanged update10 retains agreement. Withdraw any mapping to method-stage lists. Separate tightened budget3 is a different context, not the original case. - -Rationale removal arguments and value/historical/general method effectiveness claims remain source-inventoried but unproved unless a reviewed direct correspondence is available. No Boolean encoding of arbitrary truth values substitutes for an empirical or value argument. All new declarations and cases will be root-imported and audited with fixed Lean4.33.1/core; no project axioms or sorry. - -Source initial and code-only explanation are independent roles. Initial coding model tests may precede fidelity acceptance, but published passed/limited states require the recorded corresponding review. New model tradeoff: intentionally small exact worked fragments for readers instead of importing large legacy interfaces with stale provenance; report reduced retained proof coverage, not a formalization improvement by line count. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean deleted file mode 100644 index a0fd49a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,37 +0,0 @@ -import CoreReader -#check CoreReader.Duties -#print axioms CoreReader.Duties -#check CoreReader.mixed_projection -#print axioms CoreReader.mixed_projection -#check CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive -#print axioms CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive -#check CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture -#print axioms CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture -#check CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected -#print axioms CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected -#check CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected -#print axioms CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected -#check CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected -#print axioms CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected -#check CoreReader.Consistent -#print axioms CoreReader.Consistent -#check CoreReader.joint_conflict -#print axioms CoreReader.joint_conflict -#check CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set -#print axioms CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set -#check CoreReader.distinct_contexts -#print axioms CoreReader.distinct_contexts -#check CoreReader.ChangeReported -#print axioms CoreReader.ChangeReported -#check CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report -#print axioms CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report -#check CoreReader.ObservationComplete -#print axioms CoreReader.ObservationComplete -#check CoreReader.observation_gap -#print axioms CoreReader.observation_gap -#check CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion -#print axioms CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion -#check CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion -#print axioms CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion -#check CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness -#print axioms CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json deleted file mode 100644 index c9036fc..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,71 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "CoreReader.Duties", - "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", - "CoreReader.Consistent", - "CoreReader.joint_conflict", - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", - "CoreReader.ChangeReported", - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", - "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" - ], - "dependencies": { - "CoreReader.Duties": [], - "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.Consistent": [], - "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], - "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ - "propext" - ] - }, - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", - "baseline_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", - "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" - }, - "raw_summary_sha256": "f3d0183c54061a27925a6707df475a0bbb48adbc9414c65c91b4c26ffd8d982e", - "record_note": "Extract of an actual check; machine-specific evidence directory omitted. Kernel checking does not validate fidelity." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json deleted file mode 100644 index 1bf4a8c..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,942 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "CoreReader.Duties", - "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", - "CoreReader.Consistent", - "CoreReader.joint_conflict", - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", - "CoreReader.ChangeReported", - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", - "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" - ], - "dependencies": { - "CoreReader.Duties": [], - "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.Consistent": [], - "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], - "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ - "propext" - ] - }, - "reported_reviews": [], - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "manuscript": { - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "current_source": "current", - "current_baseline": "current", - "errors": [], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "c-10-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-10-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-47-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-54-c1", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c4", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-72-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-84-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "rejected", - "reported_status": "failed", - "effective_status": "failed" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "rejected", - "reported_status": "failed", - "effective_status": "failed" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c5", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c6", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-130-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - } - ], - "manifest_sha256": "80535ab7d351555636e11c5e2d76e21fe48d3a02f4cc5616e24c5823331abb0d" - }, - "kernel_passed": true, - "actual_summary_sha256": "bd18087a6abc02e174cf823db3011c5302c3e7dfd371b5d2c33629158fdb0002", - "checker_sha256": { - "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "477e9bd0e87f4abb1748dba017952e1e03794900bbdb3dda3fbfa423990a6fb7", - "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" - }, - "record_note": "Actual final check with machine-specific evidence-directory field omitted; semantic judgments remain reported." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json deleted file mode 100644 index ff22f10..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,68 +0,0 @@ -{ - "checked": [ - "CoreReader.Duties", - "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", - "CoreReader.Consistent", - "CoreReader.joint_conflict", - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", - "CoreReader.ChangeReported", - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", - "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" - ], - "dependencies": { - "CoreReader.Duties": [], - "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.Consistent": [], - "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], - "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ - "propext" - ] - }, - "errors": [], - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "passed": true, - "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" - }, - "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log deleted file mode 100644 index 121fdc4..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ -✔ [2/3] Built CoreReader (219ms) -Build completed successfully (3 jobs). -info: CoreReader: no previous manifest, creating one from scratch -info: toolchain not updated; already up-to-date diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log deleted file mode 100644 index e166155..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log +++ /dev/null @@ -1,49 +0,0 @@ -CoreReader.Duties (applicable : Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (examined : Nat → Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) - (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop -'CoreReader.Duties' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.mixed_projection (a : Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) - (h : CoreReader.Duties a e c g) (he : a c CoreReader.Aspect.empirical) (hv : a c CoreReader.Aspect.value) : - e c g CoreReader.Aspect.empirical ∧ e c g CoreReader.Aspect.value -'CoreReader.mixed_projection' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List CoreReader.Aspect) (a : Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) - (e : Nat → Nat → CoreReader.Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : - CoreReader.Assessed xs a e c g ↔ CoreReader.Assessed ys a e c g -'CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture : CoreReader.Duties CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.bothExamined 7 3 -'CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected : ¬CoreReader.Duties CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.empiricalOnly 7 3 -'CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬CoreReader.Duties CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.bothExamined 7 4 -'CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected' depends on axioms: [propext] -CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬CoreReader.Assessed [] CoreReader.mixedClaim CoreReader.empiricalOnly 7 3 -'CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.Consistent (consequence : List CoreReader.Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List CoreReader.Fact) : Prop -'CoreReader.Consistent' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.joint_conflict : - ¬CoreReader.Consistent CoreReader.fixtureConsequence - [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ, CoreReader.Fact.notQ] -'CoreReader.joint_conflict' depends on axioms: [propext] -CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set : - CoreReader.Consistent CoreReader.fixtureConsequence [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ] -'CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set' depends on axioms: [propext] -CoreReader.distinct_contexts : - CoreReader.Consistent CoreReader.fixtureConsequence [CoreReader.Fact.positiveInOne, CoreReader.Fact.negativeInTwo] -'CoreReader.distinct_contexts' depends on axioms: [propext] -CoreReader.ChangeReported (before after : List CoreReader.Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop -'CoreReader.ChangeReported' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report : - ¬CoreReader.ChangeReported [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ, CoreReader.Fact.notQ] - [CoreReader.Fact.p, CoreReader.Fact.pImpliesQ] true -'CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop -'CoreReader.ObservationComplete' does not depend on any axioms -CoreReader.observation_gap : ¬CoreReader.ObservationComplete [0, 1] -'CoreReader.observation_gap' depends on axioms: [propext] -CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion : ¬CoreReader.ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ∀ (n : Nat), n + 0 = n -'CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion' depends on axioms: [propext] -CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion : ¬CoreReader.ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬∀ (n : Nat), n = 0 -'CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion' depends on axioms: [propext] -CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness : - CoreReader.runOwnAssessment CoreReader.sampleSystem = true ∧ - ¬∀ (n : Nat), CoreReader.sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true -'CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness' depends on axioms: [propext] diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json deleted file mode 100644 index e8070ad..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,941 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "CoreReader.Duties", - "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", - "CoreReader.Consistent", - "CoreReader.joint_conflict", - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", - "CoreReader.ChangeReported", - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", - "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" - ], - "dependencies": { - "CoreReader.Duties": [], - "CoreReader.mixed_projection": [], - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive": [], - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture": [], - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected": [], - "CoreReader.Consistent": [], - "CoreReader.joint_conflict": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.ChangeReported": [], - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report": [], - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete": [], - "CoreReader.observation_gap": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion": [ - "propext" - ], - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness": [ - "propext" - ] - }, - "reported_reviews": [], - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "manuscript": { - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "current_source": "current", - "current_baseline": "current", - "errors": [], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "c-10-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-10-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-47-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-54-c1", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c4", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-72-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-84-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "rejected", - "reported_status": "failed", - "effective_status": "failed" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "rejected", - "reported_status": "failed", - "effective_status": "failed" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c5", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c6", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-130-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - } - ], - "manifest_sha256": "cf46c770e449675b6eb0fe65798bec9e84b916af2bcfab3ed22f89dd7ea733b4" - }, - "kernel_passed": true, - "actual_summary_sha256": "4a2e827b9a6695b8ddd524796e99feccdbf49519abd8bc5098ca0bccf48e5e76", - "checker_sha256": { - "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "0e3e2ced77940ece0d2a6bebbb585afce0f0ce14d99cd880215ac7b560e976d1", - "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" - } -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean deleted file mode 100644 index 574c675..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,176 +0,0 @@ -namespace CoreReader - -inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value - deriving DecidableEq - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect - -def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - Duties applicable examined claim grounds - -def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.mixed_projection -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : - e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : - Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by - intro k hk - exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.2 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.1 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c6 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := - empirical_only_rejected - -inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo - deriving DecidableEq - -def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := - (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ - (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ - (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ - (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent -organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 --/ -def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := - ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.joint_conflict -organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 --/ -theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by - intro h - exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by - intro context h - simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.distinct_contexts -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-61-c2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by - intro context h - have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 - have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn - cases impossible - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.ChangeReported -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := - before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report -organon.charter.consistency.meaning#c-59-c4 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa --/ -theorem changed_set_needs_report : - ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by - unfold ChangeReported - decide - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.ObservationComplete -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.observation_gap -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by - intro h - have h2 := h 2 - simp at h2 - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := - ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion -organon.grounds#c-89-c2 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 --/ -theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by - refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ - intro h - have bad := h 1 - cases bad - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -structure SelfAssessingSystem where - ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool - samples : List Nat - -def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := - s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple - -def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := - ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness -organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc --/ -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by - constructor - · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [sampleSystem] at bad - -end CoreReader diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json deleted file mode 100644 index 0d312c0..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/manuscript.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1429 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "repository_root": "../../..", - "source_current": { - "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" - }, - "baseline_current": { - "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" - }, - "code_files": [ - { - "path": "leanified/CoreReader.lean", - "sha256": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" - } - ], - "review": { - "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", - "sha256": "d7f8083591e4e7b27886863a7f468267fa7a14cb35b22167c535ee6e8f370cdb" - }, - "views": { - "overview_en": { - "path": "../../core-overview.md", - "sha256": "4d979ba1a23c31ed706ddc94e0ffc787fd83d4f7dc7ae57e55a95f544dee0924" - }, - "details_en": { - "path": "../../core-details.md", - "sha256": "172259ced6ccd32448585fc488e840d99bd1c66a200300a5a69aaacec0d7ebc3" - }, - "overview_zh": { - "path": "../../../zh/lean/core-overview.md", - "sha256": "74597d5b9ecc8e7c6c458254d9a3c32f829f0a6e0fd72883ebf773b0c5efc1f6" - }, - "details_zh": { - "path": "../../../zh/lean/core-details.md", - "sha256": "f1f06df9e204c07450bb6815fcc2d6125c50b410ddafce63e15cc8f2149b7b42" - } - }, - "entries": [ - { - "id": "c-10-c1", - "unit": "organon.preamble", - "clause": "c-10-c1", - "excerpt": "This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-10-c2", - "unit": "organon.preamble", - "clause": "c-10-c2", - "excerpt": "It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c1", - "unit": "organon.preamble", - "clause": "c-12-c1", - "excerpt": "The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c2", - "unit": "organon.preamble", - "clause": "c-12-c2", - "excerpt": "The charter and Grounds constrain one another;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c3", - "unit": "organon.preamble", - "clause": "c-12-c3", - "excerpt": "their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c4", - "unit": "organon.preamble", - "clause": "c-12-c4", - "excerpt": "Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter", - "unit": "organon.charter", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.overview", - "clause": "c-22-c1", - "excerpt": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.overview", - "clause": "c-22-c2", - "excerpt": "It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.overview", - "clause": "c-24-c1", - "excerpt": "The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.overview", - "clause": "c-24-c2", - "excerpt": "The provisions below specify the conditions for each.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", - "clause": "c-29-c1", - "excerpt": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", - "clause": "c-29-c2", - "excerpt": "It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", - "clause": "c-34-c1", - "excerpt": "A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", - "clause": "c-34-c2", - "excerpt": "A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c3", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", - "clause": "c-34-c3", - "excerpt": "Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", - "clause": "c-39-c1", - "excerpt": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", - "clause": "c-39-c2", - "excerpt": "“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c3", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", - "clause": "c-39-c3", - "excerpt": "These remain within the scope of possible change;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c4", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", - "clause": "c-39-c4", - "excerpt": "their revisability does not guarantee actual progress.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-44-c1", - "excerpt": "Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-44-c2", - "excerpt": "Having the orientation does not guarantee progress.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c3", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-44-c3", - "excerpt": "Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-46-c1", - "excerpt": "“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-46-c2", - "excerpt": "it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-47-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-47-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-48-c1", - "excerpt": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-48-c2", - "excerpt": "Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-49-c1", - "excerpt": "Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "clause": "c-49-c2", - "excerpt": "a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-54-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", - "clause": "c-54-c1", - "excerpt": "The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.Consistent", - "CoreReader.joint_conflict" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed." - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-59-c1", - "excerpt": "“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-59-c2", - "excerpt": "Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment;", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled." - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c3", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-59-c3", - "excerpt": "old and new principles need not remain compatible forever.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c4", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-59-c4", - "excerpt": "When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.ChangeReported", - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal." - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-61-c1", - "excerpt": "“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-61-c2", - "excerpt": "Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean." - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c3", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-61-c3", - "excerpt": "Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", - "clause": "c-66-c1", - "excerpt": "Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", - "clause": "c-66-c2", - "excerpt": "Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", - "clause": "c-67-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", - "clause": "c-67-c2", - "excerpt": "A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-72-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity", - "clause": "c-72-c1", - "excerpt": "A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", - "clause": "c-77-c1", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", - "clause": "c-77-c2", - "excerpt": "Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c3", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", - "clause": "c-77-c3", - "excerpt": "The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "clause": "c-82-c1", - "excerpt": "Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "clause": "c-82-c2", - "excerpt": "When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c3", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "clause": "c-82-c3", - "excerpt": "Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "clause": "c-83-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-application does not constitute self-proof.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c2", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "clause": "c-83-c2", - "excerpt": "Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself.", - "countermodel": { - "declaration": "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness", - "verification": "passed", - "target": "refuted", - "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", - "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Passing the system's own finite test implies its owned principle is correct at every natural input. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." - } - }, - { - "id": "c-84-c1", - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "clause": "c-84-c1", - "excerpt": "That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds", - "clause": "c-89-c1", - "excerpt": "The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds", - "clause": "c-89-c2", - "excerpt": "The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", - "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "rejected", - "status": "failed", - "reason": "ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c1", - "excerpt": "Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c2", - "excerpt": "Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c3", - "excerpt": "Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "rejected", - "status": "failed", - "reason": "unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c4", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c4", - "excerpt": "Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c5", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c5", - "excerpt": "When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.Duties", - "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c6", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c6", - "excerpt": "Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility." - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-98-c1", - "excerpt": "Empirical claim", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-98-c2", - "excerpt": "Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-98-c3", - "excerpt": "Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-99-c1", - "excerpt": "Inferential claim", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-99-c2", - "excerpt": "Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-99-c3", - "excerpt": "Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-100-c1", - "excerpt": "Value commitment", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-100-c2", - "excerpt": "State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-100-c3", - "excerpt": "Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-102-c1", - "excerpt": "Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-102-c2", - "excerpt": "they need not prove all their own starting assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-102-c3", - "excerpt": "The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c4", - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-102-c4", - "excerpt": "Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-107-c1", - "excerpt": "Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-107-c2", - "excerpt": "A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-107-c3", - "excerpt": "A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-109-c1", - "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-109-c2", - "excerpt": "Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-109-c3", - "excerpt": "Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c4", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-109-c4", - "excerpt": "Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-111-c1", - "excerpt": "An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", - "clause": "c-111-c2", - "excerpt": "The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-116-c1", - "excerpt": "Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-116-c2", - "excerpt": "The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-116-c3", - "excerpt": "Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-118-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-118-c2", - "excerpt": "Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-118-c3", - "excerpt": "Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c4", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-118-c4", - "excerpt": "it does not automatically establish understanding of that process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c5", - "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "clause": "c-118-c5", - "excerpt": "Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", - "clause": "c-123-c1", - "excerpt": "The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", - "clause": "c-123-c2", - "excerpt": "Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", - "clause": "c-125-c1", - "excerpt": "This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", - "clause": "c-125-c2", - "excerpt": "Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c3", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", - "clause": "c-125-c3", - "excerpt": "Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-130-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "clause": "c-130-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "clause": "c-131-c1", - "excerpt": "A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "clause": "c-131-c2", - "excerpt": "They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "clause": "c-132-c1", - "excerpt": "Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "clause": "c-132-c2", - "excerpt": "Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c1", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "clause": "c-133-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c2", - "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "clause": "c-133-c2", - "excerpt": "Relevant reasons may still give it priority.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships", - "unit": "organon.relationships", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c1", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-141-c1", - "excerpt": "The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c2", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-141-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c3", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-141-c3", - "excerpt": "Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c4", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-141-c4", - "excerpt": "Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c5", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-141-c5", - "excerpt": "Each commitment needs its own reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c1", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-143-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c2", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-143-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c3", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-143-c3", - "excerpt": "A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c4", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-143-c4", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c5", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-143-c5", - "excerpt": "Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c1", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-145-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c2", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-145-c2", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c3", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-145-c3", - "excerpt": "The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c4", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-145-c4", - "excerpt": "The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c5", - "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", - "clause": "c-145-c5", - "excerpt": "Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c1", - "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", - "clause": "c-152-c1", - "excerpt": "Existing form", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c2", - "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", - "clause": "c-152-c2", - "excerpt": "The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c1", - "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", - "clause": "c-153-c1", - "excerpt": "Assessment", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c2", - "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", - "clause": "c-153-c2", - "excerpt": "Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking." - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c3", - "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", - "clause": "c-153-c3", - "excerpt": "not limited to executable tests.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - } - ] -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index b4878d8..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,900 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `ba7456d7a43ecc0a49398111904a9e5d75f421393ee4bc179da37850c80c9759`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Initial blind explanation of two Lean readers (English) - -Frozen initial artifact, prepared from code only with `organon-lean-natural-language --explain-lines`. Source fidelity is unevaluated. Mapping comments were treated solely as identifiers. - -## Input boundary and checked environment - -The translator received these two encodings, the task, the natural-language skill, and their lean-toolchain/lakefile.toml files. Automatic context also exposed repository AGENTS workflow instructions, project paths, a skills catalog, and parent status messages saying a later revision might be needed. It did not expose PHILOSOPHY text, rationale source text, source snapshots, run.json, source-first assessments, prior iteration records, or author correspondence explanations. Those were not retrieved. The AGENTS request to read philosophical source was intentionally not followed for this explicitly code-only task. A parent notice of later possible revision arrived after the semantic line explanations had been drafted; no changed input was read. - -Installed Lean reported: `Lean (version 4.33.1, arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0, commit 819816b2e0a3bf405af45ae5c7af2491d8f5bee6, Release)`. Both projects declare `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1`, one lean_lib apiece, and no package dependencies. The files contain no explicit imports, so Lean supplies its standard Init environment. For each file an exact source copy followed only by `#print axioms` for every declared top-level definition, type, structure, and theorem was checked with this version; both exited 0. Original code was not edited. Audit copies and logs are beside this document. This was actual elaboration/kernel checking plus an axiom audit, not a philosophical or source-fidelity check. - -Input SHA-256 values: - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b` - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6` - - - -## Shared semantic conventions - -All explicitly named parameters are universally quantified when a declaration is used generally. Unannotated binders have types inferred from use: aspect is Aspect, and context/n are Nat in these files. No declarations introduce user axioms, sorry, typeclass premises, extra imported theories, abstract support relations with hidden interpretations, or implicit philosophical assumptions. Core decidability instances support concrete equality, order, conjunction, negation, and membership computations. Generated instances are not premises supplied by a domain user. Constructors preceded by a dot use their expected inductive type. - -`Prop` is the type of propositions. `A → B` assumes a proof of A to produce B; `¬ A` means A → False. `∧` needs both proofs, `∨` needs one chosen branch, and `↔` needs implication both ways. `∀` quantifies over its full inferred domain; `∀ n ∈ xs, P n` abbreviates a universal implication from membership. Equality is Lean equality; a Boolean polarity is data, not itself truth or falsity of an external claim. Lists are finite ordered collections with possible repetitions. Field projections `.1`/`.2` extract conjunction components in the displayed proof terms. `rfl` proves definitional equality; `Iff.rfl` proves reflexive equivalence; `decide` computes a decidable proposition. `simp` unfolds the named definitions and applies available simplification lemmas. `intro` takes an arbitrary quantified input or an implication premise; `cases` eliminates constructors, including impossible equalities. No computational success validates an interpretation of the declared names. - -## Code-derived claims - -### CoreReader: Applicability and ignored labels - -Duties is an obligation predicate: for each of the three Aspect values, applicability to the selected natural-number claim implies examination at exactly the selected claim and grounds identifiers. Both supplied predicates are arbitrary. Assessed is just Duties with an unused list parameter. mixed_projection assumes Duties and applicability of empirical and value, then obtains the two examination facts by implication elimination; it does not establish the assumed obligation. labels_do_not_waive is reflexive equivalence of definitionally identical expressions. The definitions force label independence. Neither theorem shows that a supplied applicability or examination predicate faithfully represents an external assessment. No aspect applicable means Duties holds vacuously, and an always-true examination predicate makes it hold for any applicability predicate. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:3` (lines 3–24). - -```lean - -inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value - deriving DecidableEq - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect - -def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - Duties applicable examined claim grounds - -def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:29` (lines 29–31). - -```lean - -theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : - e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:36` (lines 36–38). - -```lean - -theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : - Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl - -``` - -### CoreReader: Three fixed predicate fixtures - -mixedClaim applies only to claim 7 and the empirical and value constructors. bothExamined holds only at claim 7 and grounds 3 for those same two constructors; empiricalOnly permits just empirical. complete_mixed_fixture constructs the required conjunctions at 7 and 3. empirical_only_rejected assumes Duties and obtains the impossible equality value = empirical. unrelated_grounds_rejected obtains 4 = 3 from the hard-coded grounds field. omitted_labels_still_rejected is exactly empirical_only_rejected after unfolding Assessed with an empty label list. These are constructive examples over chosen numeral identifiers. The numeral mismatch has no independently defined semantic relevance relation, and the code supplies no general procedure for finding applicable aspects or adequate grounds. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:43` (lines 43–45). - -```lean - -theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by - intro k hk - exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:50` (lines 50–53). - -```lean - -theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:58` (lines 58–61). - -```lean - -theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.1 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:66` (lines 66–67). - -```lean - -theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := - empirical_only_rejected - -``` - -### CoreReader: A finite token relation and same-context exclusion - -Fact is a five-token enumeration, with no formula syntax or valuation. In particular, pImpliesQ is not an implication and notQ is not negation. fixtureConsequence is a hand-written relation: at context 0, true requires membership of both p and pImpliesQ, while false requires notQ; context 1 has only the positiveInOne true branch; context 2 has only the negativeInTwo false branch. All other contexts fail. Consistent permits any supplied relation and means that true and false never both hold for one common context and the same token list. joint_conflict exhibits both at context 0 for the three-token list. withdrawn_current_set rules out all false branches of the shorter two-token list. distinct_contexts shows that the two singleton-style branches force an impossible common context 1 = 2. These theorems check this finite relation, not deductive closure of a general logic. Lists record no acquisition, withdrawal event, temporal history, or reasons for withdrawing a token. With an always-false consequence relation every held list is Consistent; with a relation true for both polarities at one context none is. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:69` (lines 69–82). - -```lean - -inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo - deriving DecidableEq - -def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := - (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ - (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ - (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ - (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent -organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 --/ -def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := - ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:87` (lines 87–89). - -```lean - -theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by - intro h - exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:94` (lines 94–96). - -```lean - -theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by - intro context h - simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:101` (lines 101–106). - -```lean - -theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by - intro context h - have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 - have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn - cases impossible - -``` - -### CoreReader: A Boolean condition on unequal lists - -ChangeReported before after claimsUnchanged means before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false. The concrete theorem rejects passing true for the two specified unequal lists by decidable computation. Lists, despite names containing set, are ordered and retain multiplicity: reordering or adding a duplicate can count as change here. Equal lists satisfy the implication vacuously even if the Boolean is true; a false Boolean always satisfies it. This is a Boolean admissibility condition and supplies no report contents, recipient, disclosure event, or evidence that anyone reports anything. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:111` (lines 111–112). - -```lean - -def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := - before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:117` (lines 117–120). - -```lean - -theorem changed_set_needs_report : - ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by - unfold ChangeReported - decide - -``` - -### CoreReader: A missing natural number alongside independently true and false claims - -ObservationComplete observed requires every natural number to belong to a finite list. observation_gap refutes completeness of [0, 1] using 2. The code proves this one list's gap; in standard finite-list semantics no finite list contains all natural numbers, but that general statement is not a theorem in this file. gap_with_true_conclusion pairs the gap with ∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n, proved by reduction and reflexivity. gap_with_false_conclusion pairs it with ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0), refuted at 1. These are conjunctions with independent arithmetic results. They show this fixed membership gap coexists with a true selected universal statement and the falsity of another selected universal statement. No support relation connects the list to either statement; no observation reliability, induction rule, or general theory of evidential support is defined. The quantifier is over all Nat, not all members of the observed list. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:125` (lines 125–125). - -```lean - -def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:130` (lines 130–133). - -```lean - -theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by - intro h - have h2 := h 2 - simp at h2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:138` (lines 138–140). - -```lean - -theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := - ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:145` (lines 145–150). - -```lean - -theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by - refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ - intro h - have bad := h 1 - cases bad - -``` - -### CoreReader: A singleton passes an equation which fails universally - -proposedPrinciple is n + 1 = 2 * n over Nat; selfAssessmentSamples is [1]. The theorem proves every list member satisfies the equation, by reducing membership to n = 1 and computing. It refutes universal satisfaction by evaluating the assumed equation at 0, where 1 = 0 would follow. All variables here are natural numbers; the bounded syntax ∀ n ∈ samples expands to ∀ n, n ∈ samples → equation n. This is a finite-sample arithmetic counterexample. No self-assessment process, evaluator, philosophy object, or correctness relation is modeled; the declaration names do not add one. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–154). - -```lean - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -def selfAssessmentSamples : List Nat := [1] - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:159` (lines 159–169). - -```lean - -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - (∀ n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples, proposedPrinciple n) ∧ ¬ (∀ n, proposedPrinciple n) := by - constructor - · intro n hn - simp [selfAssessmentSamples] at hn - subst n - unfold proposedPrinciple - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [proposedPrinciple] at bad - -``` - -### RationaleReader: Record projections, fixed updates, and separate latency data - -ServiceState is a pair of arbitrary natural numbers. direct and cachedRead are pure field projections. updateOnly replaces acknowledged and preserves cached; updateInvalidating ignores its old state and constructs (n, n). initial is (10, 10). LatencyContext is a separate triple; originalLatency is (5, 2, 6) and stricterLatency is (5, 2, 3), in direct/cache/budget order. withinBudget means both latency fields are at most budget. original_comparison computes agreement at initial and the inequalities 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6. There are no constraints relating a state's values or update functions to the latency records. These numbers are constants, with no units, measured workloads, I/O, concurrent execution, or latency distribution. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:3` (lines 3–28). - -```lean - -structure ServiceState where - acknowledged : Nat - cached : Nat - deriving DecidableEq - -def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged - -def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached - -def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } - -def updateInvalidating (_s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := ⟨n, n⟩ - -def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ - -structure LatencyContext where - directLatency : Nat - cacheLatency : Nat - budget : Nat - -def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ - -def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ - -def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := - c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:33` (lines 33–35). - -```lean - -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: A stale projection for one update and a false universal equality - -update_read_counterexample proves initial agreement at 10 and disagreement after updateOnly initial 11, whose fields are (11, 10). cached_freshness_refuted disproves ∀ n : Nat, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n by n = 11; the cached field remains 10. Thus the supplied universal equality fails in the explicitly constructed pure model. This is not a proof about all cache implementations, or a measured service failure. Neither theorem states a general implication from initial agreement to all subsequent agreement; the fixture instead supplies a concrete before/after contrast. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:41` (lines 41–43). - -```lean - -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:48` (lines 48–51). - -```lean - -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad - -``` - -### RationaleReader: Equal fields written directly; unchanged writes - -invalidation_restores_fixture computes that updateInvalidating initial 11 has both projections equal to 11, because the definition returns (11, 11). It models writing both values directly, not deletion of a cache entry or a protocol that later reloads one. unchanged_update_retained computes agreement after updateOnly initial 10, which preserves (10, 10). These theorems have no external premises and prove their particular numerical examples; neither claims a general temporal safety or invalidation theorem. The broader all-n equality for updateInvalidating follows from its definition, but is not the stated fixture theorem. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:56` (lines 56–57). - -```lean - -theorem invalidation_restores_fixture : - direct (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 ∧ cachedRead (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:62` (lines 62–63). - -```lean - -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: A budget-only change - -budget_change_is_distinct proves withinBudget (5, 2, 6) and not withinBudget (5, 2, 3). Both fixed latency numbers stay the same; the direct value 5 exceeds the smaller budget 3 although cache value 2 remains within it. The proof unfolds the predicate and computes. There is no causal claim that the service changed, no universal performance result, and no theorem connecting this budget condition to the separate cached-value disagreement. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:68` (lines 68–71). - -```lean - -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: An identity proof with a supplied proposition - -namedUniversalTruth explicitly quantifies over a proposition P and its assumed proof h : P, then returns exactly h. Its content is ∀ P : Prop, P → P. There are no hidden typeclass assumptions and no proof that an arbitrary proposition is true without h. In particular, the name does not create universal truth, philosophical correctness, or correspondence to any prose statement. This is the identity function on proofs. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:76` (lines 76–76). - -```lean - -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h - -``` - -### RationaleReader: One specific inequality and a different false generalization - -encoded_statement computes the single true inequality (0 : Nat) ≤ 1. different_statement_refuted refutes ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 at 2; case analysis of Nat's inductive ≤ proof reduces the impossible 2 ≤ 1 to an impossible 2 ≤ 0 case. proof_of_different_claim pairs the earlier results. It does not obtain the universal claim from the specific one. This proves a precise true/false contrast between two arithmetic statements, without a semantic encoding function or general theorem about the fidelity of formalization. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:81` (lines 81–81). - -```lean - -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:86` (lines 86–90). - -```lean - -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:95` (lines 95–97). - -```lean - -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ - -``` - -## Actual dependency audit - -The following checked declarations depend on Lean core `propext` (propositional extensionality, allowing equivalent propositions to be identified): `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected`, `CoreReader.joint_conflict`, `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set`, `CoreReader.distinct_contexts`, `CoreReader.observation_gap`, `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion`, `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion`, `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness`, `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted`, `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted`, and `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim`. Every other top-level declaration audited in the two files reported no axioms. The complete declaration-by-declaration output is in `CoreReader.audit.log` and `RationaleReader.audit.log`; these statements refer to the checked proof terms, including any dependency introduced by tactic-generated proofs. No claim is made that a listed axiom is required by every possible proof of the proposition. - -## Appendix: every nonblank source line - -Each numbered entry explains its actual line. Exact code is preserved in the excerpts above and the audit copies. Mapping comments supply metadata only. The machine-readable equivalent is `line-explanations.json`. - -### CoreReader.lean - -Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`; SHA-256 `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`. - -- L1: Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. - -- L3: Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. - -- L4: Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. - -- L6: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L7: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L8: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L9: Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - -- L10: Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. - -- L11: Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. - -- L13: Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. - -- L14: Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. - -- L15: Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. - -- L17: Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - -- L18: It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. - -- L20: Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - -- L21: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. - -- L23: Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - -- L24: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. - -- L26: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L27: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L28: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L29: Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. - -- L30: Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. - -- L31: Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. - -- L33: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L34: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L35: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L36: Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. - -- L37: Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. - -- L38: Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. - -- L40: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L41: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L42: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L43: State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. - -- L44: Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. - -- L45: Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. - -- L47: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L48: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L49: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L50: State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. - -- L51: Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. - -- L52: Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. - -- L53: Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. - -- L55: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L56: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L57: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L58: State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. - -- L59: Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. - -- L60: Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. - -- L61: Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. - -- L63: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L64: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L65: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L66: State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. - -- L67: Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. - -- L69: Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. - -- L70: Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. - -- L72: Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. - -- L73: The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. - -- L74: The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. - -- L75: A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. - -- L76: The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. - -- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L81: Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. - -- L82: Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. - -- L84: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L85: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L86: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L87: State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. - -- L88: Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. - -- L89: Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. - -- L91: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L92: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L93: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L94: State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. - -- L95: For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. - -- L96: Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. - -- L98: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L99: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L100: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L101: State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. - -- L102: Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. - -- L103: Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. - -- L104: Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. - -- L105: Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. - -- L106: Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. - -- L108: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L109: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L110: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L111: Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. - -- L112: Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. - -- L114: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L115: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L116: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L117: Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. - -- L118: State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. - -- L119: Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. - -- L120: Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. - -- L122: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L123: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L124: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L125: Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. - -- L127: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L128: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L129: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L130: State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. - -- L131: Assume completeness for contradiction. - -- L132: Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. - -- L133: Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. - -- L135: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L136: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L137: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L138: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. - -- L139: State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. - -- L140: Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. - -- L142: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L143: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L144: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L145: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. - -- L146: State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. - -- L147: Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. - -- L148: Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. - -- L149: Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. - -- L150: Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. - -- L152: Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. - -- L154: Define selfAssessmentSamples as the singleton natural-number list [1]. No assessment algorithm is encoded. - -- L156: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L157: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L158: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L159: Begin a theorem contrasting the fixed sample list with universal arithmetic validity. - -- L160: State that every member of [1] satisfies n + 1 = 2 * n, and that this equation does not hold for every natural number. The bounded quantifier expands to ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n. - -- L161: Split the conjunction into its sampled and universal-negation proof obligations. - -- L162: For the first obligation, introduce an arbitrary natural number n and its assumed sample-list membership hn. - -- L163: Unfold the singleton list and simplify membership, obtaining n = 1. - -- L164: Substitute 1 for n in the goal. - -- L165: Unfold proposedPrinciple to the arithmetic equation at 1. - -- L166: Prove the concrete equality 1 + 1 = 2 * 1 by decidable computation. - -- L167: For the second obligation, assume the equation holds at every natural number. - -- L168: Specialize the assumption to 0. - -- L169: Unfold and simplify the equation at 0, yielding the contradiction 1 = 0. - -- L171: Close the CoreReader namespace. - -### RationaleReader.lean - -Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`; SHA-256 `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`. - -- L1: Open the RationaleReader namespace. - -- L3: Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. - -- L4: Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. - -- L5: Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. - -- L6: Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. - -- L8: Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. - -- L10: Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. - -- L12: Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. - -- L14: Define updateInvalidating to ignore its old state entirely and return the pair (n, n). Despite its name, it directly writes both fields; it has no invalid marker, eviction, fetch, or invalidation protocol. - -- L16: Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. - -- L18: Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. - -- L19: Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. - -- L20: Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. - -- L21: Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. - -- L23: Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. - -- L25: Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. - -- L27: Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. - -- L28: Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. - -- L30: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L31: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L32: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L33: State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. - -- L34: Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. - -- L35: Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). - -- L37: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L38: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L39: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L40: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L41: Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. - -- L42: The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. - -- L43: The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. - -- L45: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L46: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L47: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L48: State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. - -- L49: Assume this universal equality for contradiction. - -- L50: Specialize it to 11. - -- L51: Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. - -- L53: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L54: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L55: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L56: Begin a concrete conjunction theorem about updateInvalidating initial 11. - -- L57: Prove by computation that both fields of the returned state are 11. This follows from construction of (11, 11), not a modeled cache invalidation process. - -- L59: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L60: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L61: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L62: Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. - -- L63: Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. - -- L65: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L66: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L67: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L68: Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. - -- L69: State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. - -- L70: Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. - -- L71: Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. - -- L73: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L74: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L75: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L76: For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. - -- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L81: Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. - -- L83: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L84: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L85: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L86: State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. - -- L87: Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. - -- L88: Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. - -- L89: Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. - -- L90: In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. - -- L92: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L93: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L94: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L95: Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. - -- L96: State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. - -- L97: Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. - -- L99: Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md deleted file mode 100644 index c2eceb2..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,477 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `2604d478b8cc776bd766a67a2edd4b27cd99f8b6c781d3f564fc751b0ae98425`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 两份 Lean 读者编码的初始盲解释（中文译稿） - -本稿翻译已经冻结的英文代码解释，没有读取来源原文或更新后的编码。英文初稿 initial.en.md 及其 SHA-256 保持不变；本稿不评估来源忠实性。 - -## 代码含义概览 - -CoreReader 的 Duties 是条件义务：对三个 Aspect 中的每个方面，若任意 supplied applicable 谓词判为适用，则同一主张及依据对应的 examined 关系必须成立。Assessed 完全忽略标签列表，因此标签不影响结果是定义直接决定的。具体示例用编号 7、3 及固定方面建立成立或不成立；编号 4 被拒绝来自 4 ≠ 3，不来自另外定义的相关性关系。 - -Fact 是五种标记，不含命题公式或逻辑赋值。fixtureConsequence 只有手写的三个语境分支；Consistent 排除同一语境中同一列表的两种布尔极性同时成立。具体定理证明该有限关系上的冲突、删除 notQ 后无负极性分支，以及不同语境不能成为同一语境；没有一般逻辑的演绎闭包或实际撤回过程。 - -ChangeReported 仅要求列表不等时布尔参数为 false，不含报告内容或行为。列表有序且允许重复；相同列表令蕴含空真。ObservationComplete 要求有限列表包含所有自然数；[0, 1] 在 2 处失败。其余两个定理将这项缺口分别与独立的算术真命题和假全称命题的否定组成合取，没有定义列表对结论的支持关系。 - -初始 selfAssessmentSamples 是 [1]，proposedPrinciple 是 n + 1 = 2 * n。证明在唯一样本 1 处成立，在 0 处失败；初始编码没有自评算法、评估者或哲学对象。 - -RationaleReader 的 ServiceState 只是两个自然数字段；direct 和 cachedRead 是纯投影，updateOnly 只写 acknowledged，初始 updateInvalidating 直接返回 (n, n)。这些是纯函数，没有 I/O、并发、失效标志或重新加载协议。具体例子证明 (10, 10) 初始一致，单字段改为 11 后成为 (11, 10)，两个字段直接写为 11 后一致，以及写回原值 10 后一致。 - -延迟记录独立于状态和更新函数。两个延迟恒为 5、2，预算从 6 改为 3 后，直接延迟不再达标；没有单位、测量或因果关系。namedUniversalTruth 对任意 P 和显式 h : P 直接返回 h，内容仅为 P → P。最后三个定理证明 0 ≤ 1，同时用 2 反驳所有自然数均 ≤ 1；没有语义编码函数或一般形式化忠实性定理。 - -## 检查及依赖 - -原始两个文件的逐字副本附加每个顶层声明的 #print axioms 后，均在 Lean 4.33.1 实际检查成功。部分证明依赖 Lean core 的 propext，其余已审计顶层声明无公理依赖。确切逐声明输出见同目录 CoreReader.audit.log、RationaleReader.audit.log；英文稿列出全部 propext 声明。检查仅证明这些形式命题的内核有效性，不证明哲学正确性或来源忠实性。 - -## 全部非空行解释 - -### CoreReader.lean - -路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`。 - -- L1：打开 CoreReader 命名空间；后续声明名带此前缀。 - -- L3：声明 Aspect 类型，恰有 empirical、inferential、value 三个互异的无参数构造子；名称本身没有定义领域含义。 - -- L4：生成 DecidableEq 实例，使任意两个 Aspect 值的相等性可计算判定。 - -- L6：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L7：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L8：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L9：开始定义命题 Duties，接收以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的任意适用性谓词 applicable。 - -- L10：再接收关于主张编号、依据编号和 Aspect 的任意三元谓词 examined，以及显式自然数参数 claim、grounds；未假设这些谓词具备任何性质。 - -- L11：Duties 表示：对每个 Aspect，若它适用于当前主张，则 examined 对同一主张、同一依据及该 Aspect 成立。没有任何适用方面时，此条件空真。 - -- L13：开始定义 Assessed，显式接收 Aspect 标签列表和任意适用性谓词；以下划线开头的标签参数未被使用。 - -- L14：接收 examined 谓词以及自然数主张、依据编号；返回命题。 - -- L15：将 Assessed 定义为这些谓词和编号对应的 Duties；标签既不限制也不加强该命题。 - -- L17：定义以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的 mixedClaim。 - -- L18：它恰在主张编号为 7 且方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；inferential 从不满足。 - -- L20：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 bothExamined。 - -- L21：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；合取向右嵌套。 - -- L23：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 empiricalOnly。 - -- L24：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 时成立；没有 value 或 inferential 分支。 - -- L26：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L27：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L28：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L29：开始一个对任意适用性谓词 a 和 examined 谓词 e 全称参数化的定理。 - -- L30：显式接收自然数 c、g，Duties a e c g 的假定证明 h，以及 empirical 和 value 适用于 c 的假定证明。 - -- L31：结论是在同一 c、g 上的两个 e 事实同时成立；分别把 h 用于 he、hv，再组成合取。下划线是推断出的 Aspect 实参；没有脱离这些前提建立任何 examination 事实。 - -- L33：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L34：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L35：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L36：开始一个关于任意两个标签列表 xs、ys 以及任意适用性谓词 a 的定理。 - -- L37：还量化 examined 谓词以及主张、依据编号。 - -- L38：用 Iff.rfl 证明两个 Assessed 命题等价：标签被忽略，两者都归约为同一 Duties 命题。这是定义恒等，不是关于标签的经验发现。 - -- L40：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L41：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L42：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L43：陈述具体谓词 mixedClaim、bothExamined 在主张 7、依据 3 处满足 Duties，并开始 tactic 证明。 - -- L44：引入任意方面 k 及 mixedClaim 7 k 的证明 hk。 - -- L45：构造 bothExamined 7 3 k：复用 hk 中的 7 = 7，用自反性证明 3 = 3，再复用 hk 中的方面析取。 - -- L47：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L48：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L49：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L50：陈述具体关系 empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处不满足 mixedClaim 的 Duties。 - -- L51：假设所否定的 Duties 命题，目标为推出 False。 - -- L52：把该假设用于 value；用 7 = 7 和右侧析取 value = value 建立适用性，得到 hv : empiricalOnly 7 3 value。 - -- L53：取出 hv 最内层的等式 value = empirical，利用两个 Aspect 构造子互异将其消去。 - -- L55：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L56：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L57：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L58：陈述在依据编号 4 而非 bothExamined 固定的 3 处，Duties 不成立。 - -- L59：为推出矛盾，假设主张 7、依据 4 处成立 Duties。 - -- L60：将其用于适用的 value 方面，得到 bothExamined 7 4 value。 - -- L61：消去得到的等式 4 = 3，即 hv.2.1。矛盾来自数值不等，而非单独定义的相关性概念。 - -- L63：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L64：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L65：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L66：陈述空标签列表无法使 mixedClaim、empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处的 Assessed 成立。 - -- L67：直接复用 empirical_only_rejected；展开 Assessed 后恰为此前定理否定的命题。 - -- L69：声明具有五个互异无参数构造子的 Fact 类型；pImpliesQ 是标记而非 Lean 蕴含，notQ 是标记而非逻辑否定。 - -- L70：生成 Fact 的可判定相等性，使具体列表成员关系可计算判定。 - -- L72：定义有限 Fact 标记列表、自然数语境和布尔极性之间的关系；列表不必无重复。 - -- L73：第一个语境 0 分支要求极性为 true 且 p、pImpliesQ 都属于列表，或者采用下一行的备选条件。 - -- L74：语境 0 的另一条件要求极性为 false 且 notQ 属于列表；此处结束语境 0 分支。 - -- L75：独立分支要求语境为 1、极性为 true 且 positiveInOne 属于列表。 - -- L76：最后一个分支要求语境为 2、极性为 false 且 negativeInTwo 属于列表；没有其他分支或推理规则。 - -- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L81：以所示类型的任意 consequence 关系及有限 Fact 标记列表定义 Consistent。 - -- L82：要求每个自然数语境中，同一列表的 true 和 false 两种极性不能同时满足该关系；未限制所传关系必须对应逻辑蕴涵。 - -- L84：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L85：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L86：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L87：陈述列表 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 在具体 fixtureConsequence 下不满足 Consistent。 - -- L88：为推出矛盾，假设该列表满足一致性条件。 - -- L89：将一致性条件用于语境 0，提供两种极性的证明；它们分别通过简化显式关系和具体列表成员关系得到。 - -- L91：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L92：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L93：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L94：陈述较短列表 [p, pImpliesQ] 在 fixtureConsequence 下满足一致性条件。 - -- L95：对任意语境，假设两种极性同时成立，目标为 False。 - -- L96：简化 false 极性的假设 h.2；列表中既没有 notQ 也没有 negativeInTwo，因此所有 false 分支都不可能。 - -- L98：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L99：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L100：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L101：陈述 [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] 在示例关系下满足一致性条件。 - -- L102：引入同一个语境，并假设两种极性都在其中成立。 - -- L103：简化 true 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 1。 - -- L104：简化 false 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 2。 - -- L105：把第一个等式反向后与第二个复合，得到不可能的自然数等式 1 = 2。 - -- L106：消去不可能的等式，完成矛盾证明。 - -- L108：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L109：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L110：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L111：以两个列表和名为 claimsUnchanged 的布尔值定义 ChangeReported；这些都是显式输入，没有时间、说话者或报告对象。 - -- L112：要求列表不等蕴含 claimsUnchanged = false；列表相等时条件空真。列表相等区分顺序和重复次数；false 不提供任何报告内容。 - -- L114：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L115：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L116：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L117：开始如下关于 ChangeReported 的具体否定定理。 - -- L118：陈述从 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 改为 [p, pImpliesQ] 且传入 true 时不满足 ChangeReported。 - -- L119：将 ChangeReported 展开为从列表不等到布尔等式的蕴含。 - -- L120：计算判定这个具体命题：列表不同，但 true 不等于 false。 - -- L122：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L123：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L124：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L125：定义 ObservationComplete observed 为每个自然数都属于有限列表 observed；未标注类型的 n 由成员关系推断为 Nat。没有建模观察过程。 - -- L127：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L128：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L129：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L130：陈述列表 [0, 1] 不包含全部自然数。 - -- L131：为推出矛盾，假设其完备。 - -- L132：把全称成员假设用于 2，得到 2 ∈ [0, 1]。 - -- L133：将这个不可能的具体成员关系简化为 False。 - -- L135：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L136：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L137：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L138：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个算术真命题。 - -- L139：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不满足 ObservationComplete，以及每个自然数满足 n + 0 = n。 - -- L140：用 observation_gap 和对每个自然数给出自反性证明的函数构造合取；Nat 加法把 n + 0 归约为 n。算术证明独立于列表。 - -- L142：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L143：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L144：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L145：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个错误全称等式。 - -- L146：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不完备，以及“每个自然数都等于 0”为假。 - -- L147：把 observation_gap 用作第一个合取项，留下被否定全称命题的证明目标。 - -- L148：假设所有自然数都等于 0，目标为 False。 - -- L149：将假设用于 1，得到 1 = 0。 - -- L150：消去不可能的数值等式。 - -- L152：将 proposedPrinciple n 定义为自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n；名称没有赋予其哲学或规范地位。 - -- L154：将 selfAssessmentSamples 定义为单元素自然数列表 [1]；没有编码评估算法。 - -- L156：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L157：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L158：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L159：开始一个比较固定样本列表与算术全称有效性的定理。 - -- L160：陈述 [1] 中每个元素满足 n + 1 = 2 * n，而非每个自然数都满足它。受限量词展开为 ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n。 - -- L161：将合取拆为样本成立和否定全称成立两个证明目标。 - -- L162：对第一个目标，引入任意自然数 n 及其属于样本列表的假设 hn。 - -- L163：展开单元素列表并简化成员关系，得到 n = 1。 - -- L164：在目标中用 1 替换 n。 - -- L165：展开 proposedPrinciple，得到 1 处的算术等式。 - -- L166：通过可判定计算证明具体等式 1 + 1 = 2 * 1。 - -- L167：对第二个目标，假设该等式在每个自然数处都成立。 - -- L168：将假设用于 0。 - -- L169：展开并简化 0 处的等式，得到矛盾 1 = 0。 - -- L171：关闭 CoreReader 命名空间。 - -### RationaleReader.lean - -路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`。 - -- L1：打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 - -- L3：声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 - -- L4：声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 - -- L5：声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 - -- L6：通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 - -- L8：将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - -- L10：将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - -- L12：将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 - -- L14：将 updateInvalidating 定义为完全忽略旧状态并返回 (n, n)；尽管名称如此，它直接写入两个字段，没有无效标志、逐出、读取或失效协议。 - -- L16：将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 - -- L18：声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 - -- L19：声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 - -- L20：声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 - -- L21：声明 budget，取任意自然数。 - -- L23：将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 - -- L25：将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 - -- L27：开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 - -- L28：使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 - -- L30：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L31：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L32：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L33：陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 - -- L34：将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 - -- L35：通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 - -- L37：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L38：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L39：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L40：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L41：开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 - -- L42：第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 - -- L43：第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 - -- L45：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L46：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L47：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L48：陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 - -- L49：为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 - -- L50：将其用于 11。 - -- L51：展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 - -- L53：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L54：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L55：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L56：开始一个关于 updateInvalidating initial 11 的具体合取定理。 - -- L57：通过计算证明返回状态的两个字段均为 11；这来自构造 (11, 11)，而非已建模的缓存失效过程。 - -- L59：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L60：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L61：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L62：开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 - -- L63：计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 - -- L65：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L66：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L67：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L68：开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 - -- L69：陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 - -- L70：将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 - -- L71：计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 - -- L73：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L74：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L75：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L76：对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 - -- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L81：通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 - -- L83：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L84：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L85：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L86：陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 - -- L87：为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 - -- L88：将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 - -- L89：利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 - -- L90：在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 - -- L92：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L93：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L94：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L95：开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 - -- L96：同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 - -- L97：复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 - -- L99：关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index dcc68e1..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,95 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `bd4eb98a1b1369a610195329d9f33f2162c693aa31def3b28ec03d37874a0e17`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Informed code update: Round 2 (English) - -## Status and input boundary - -This is an informed incremental code explanation, not a fresh blind assessment. The original English explanation and line JSON were frozen before this update, and the original Chinese explanation and line JSON were completed without reading revised code. The initiating agent then disclosed the changed declaration locations and requested this update. That message mentioned a new stored-principle/sample computation and revised state-list comparison; it supplied no source prose or source correspondence judgment. The translator has now inspected the revised encoding, while still not reading PHILOSOPHY, rationale source prose, source snapshots, run.json, source-first judgments, author mapping interpretations, or prior records. Original blind artifacts remain unchanged. Source fidelity remains unevaluated. - -Current input hashes: - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803` - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7` - -## CoreReader: an actual finite Boolean assessment - -At lines 154–162, SelfAssessingSystem stores ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool and samples : List Nat. runOwnAssessment applies List.all to the samples with the function from that same record. This gives an explicit identity link: the function assessed on the finite samples is the very field later quantified over in the theorem. List.all evaluates to true on [] and evaluates p head && all tail p on a nonempty list. It therefore checks all listed inputs, without checking any unlisted input. The fields impose no sample-selection, nonemptiness, coverage, or correctness invariant. The word own is a field name; the code establishes that the function is stored in this record, but has no provenance or ownership relation. - -sampleSystem stores the Boolean function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n and the sample list [1]. The old proposedPrinciple definition at line 152 remains, but the function literally repeats its arithmetic expression rather than referring to that definition. The sample function is computational, using the inferred Decidable instance for natural-number equality. This library instance supplies an equality decision procedure, not an extra domain premise supplied by a caller. - -At lines 167–174, self_assessment_not_correctness proves runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true and ¬ (∀ n : Nat, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true). The first part unfolds the actual computation and decides the equation at 1. The second assumes true at every input, instantiates at 0, and simplifies the false arithmetic equation to the impossible Boolean equality false = true. Thus this one system passes its actual finite sample check while its own stored function fails at an untested input. This now includes an assessment computation that the initial encoding lacked. It remains a numerical example of finite testing; it does not encode assessment of an evaluator, recursive philosophical self-application, correctness of a philosophy, or fulfillment of an external responsibility. Passing the supplied finite test does not become a premise proving all-input validity. - -Exact revised encoding: - -`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–174) - -```lean - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -structure SelfAssessingSystem where - ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool - samples : List Nat - -def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := - s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple - -def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := - ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness -organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc --/ -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by - constructor - · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [sampleSystem] at bad - -``` - -## RationaleReader: retaining one input while adding a revealing input - -The initial updateInvalidating definition and invalidation_restores_fixture theorem have been removed. Their old explanation describes only the frozen initial input; no current theorem models direct writes to both fields as a repair. - -At lines 91–96, originalStates is [initial] and revisedStates is [initial, updateOnly initial 11]. These are explicit lists of pure records: initial has (acknowledged, cached) = (10, 10), and the additional record has (11, 10). The original record is retained as the identical first list element. compareReads maps each input to the pair (direct state, cachedRead state); List.map preserves order and length. Despite its name, the function collects observations into pairs and does not itself test the two values for equality or produce an equivalence verdict. - -At lines 101–103, revised_method_retains_case proves the exact output lists [(10, 10)] and [(10, 10), (11, 10)] by decidable computation. This demonstrates for these two fixed input lists that expanding the selected cases retains the earlier equal pair and adds a differing pair. It does not repair the state transformation, establish cache freshness, prove a universal theorem about all method revisions, or model all possible update/read interleavings. The output lists provide concrete observable artifacts; they are not execution histories with timing or independent support for the chosen domain interpretation. - -Exact revised encoding: - -`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:91` (lines 91–103) - -```lean - -def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] - -def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] - -def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := - states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide - -``` - -## Retained claims and limits - -Unchanged declarations retain the code-derived meanings in the initial manuscript. In particular, Assessed still ignores labels; Duties still depends on arbitrary predicates; the token consequence relation is still finite and explicitly stipulated; ChangeReported is still only a Boolean condition on list inequality; the observation-gap conjunctions still have no evidence-support relation; and namedUniversalTruth still returns the supplied proof h unchanged. The new assessment computation and new state-list output theorem do not alter those independent limitations. Line numbers in the initial manuscript belong to the frozen initial inputs; use line-explanations-current.json for current locations. - -## Actual checks and dependencies - -Both revised files were copied verbatim into *.current.audit.lean with only #print axioms commands appended for every top-level declared definition, type, structure, and theorem, then elaborated and kernel-checked with installed Lean 4.33.1. Both commands exited 0. The declaration-by-declaration logs are CoreReader.current.audit.log and RationaleReader.current.audit.log. The same retained set of theorem names reported propext as in the initial audit; self_assessment_not_correctness still uses propext. The added SelfAssessingSystem, runOwnAssessment, sampleSystem, originalStates, revisedStates, compareReads, and revised_method_retains_case reported no axioms. No user axiom or sorry was introduced. The checked List.all body and Decidable.decide definition are recorded in core-library-inspection.log. Decidable.decide returns false for an isFalse decision and true for an isTrue decision; its Decidable argument is a core-inferred typeclass instance here. - -The full current nonblank-line explanation is line-explanations-current.json, with both en and zh for every line, including comments, fields, definitions, proof steps, and namespace delimiters. Unchanged entries were reused only through exact aligned code lines, while the changed Core block and all newly added Rationale lines were explained afresh. This is an explanation and formal dependency check, not independent validation of source meaning or philosophical correctness. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json deleted file mode 100644 index 48ad2b5..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,894 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", - "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" - }, - "initial_records": [ - { - "role": "source_initial", - "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", - "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" - }, - { - "role": "code_blind", - "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", - "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" - }, - { - "role": "code_informed_update", - "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", - "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison", - "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", - "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" - } - ], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "c-10-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-10-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-47-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-54-c1", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed.", - "reason_zh": "Consistent以整个同时持有列表推得同一context的正反结论，p/pImpliesQ/notQ实例确有联合推论。这里只表示一个问题和合并的context编号，未分开含义、假设、范围，也不是一般推论演算；义务仅被定义为谓词，未证明普遍履行。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled.", - "reason_zh": "缩减后的当前列表[.p,.pImpliesQ]在fixtureConsequence中没有否定结论，可示例说明撤回后的相容状态；未建模修订事件、前后时态关系或许可语义。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c4", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal.", - "reason_zh": "选定的撤回操作在claimsUnchanged=true时不满足ChangeReported，只演示报告约束，并未证明报告实际发生。一般List不等还包含重排或重复元素的差别，强于语义变化；对应关系仅限展示的实质撤回实例。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean.", - "reason_zh": "选定实例中，不同context编号下的相反结论不能组成同一context冲突，可展示原文“不自动构成矛盾”的区别；实际假设、含义、范围为何不同仍需在Lean之外解释。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-72-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself.", - "reason_zh": "修订在SelfAssessingSystem中实际存储ownPrinciple与samples，并以同一所属谓词计算runOwnAssessment。展示的系统在自身样本[1]上返回true，而其自身谓词在0处为假，形成有解释依据的有限自评反例。空样本也通过，加入0则拒绝；另一个恒真所属原则既通过又普遍正确。因此对应仅限此具体所属关系与测试解释：不证明每次自评都不足，也未完整编码反身性、形成/修订、适用性或对评估规则本身的评价。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-84-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c2", - "fidelity": "rejected", - "reason": "ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", - "reason_zh": "ObservationComplete只问列表是否包含所有自然数，没有观测结果、主张身份、根据关系或支持相称规则。真假算术结论仅分别与同一覆盖缺口并列，且真结论本身另有证明。未穷尽输入不等于支持不足，无观测结果的穷尽输入也不等于充分支持。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c3", - "fidelity": "rejected", - "reason": "unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", - "reason_zh": "unrelated_grounds_rejected因bothExamined要求编号3而拒绝编号4，只保留编号敏感性。它没有考察具体根据是否支持对应主张，没有考察结果，也没有将该记录解释为这种考察的依据。变量名examined不能建立原文责任。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c5", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation.", - "reason_zh": "Duties保留同一主张/根据对上每个适用面的全称责任，经验/价值混合实例确实拒绝仅有经验记录。Aspect的三个构造子是预设应用分类，不是推导出的穷尽分类；mixed_projection展开既有责任假设，bothExamined预设记录。均未建模经验、推论、价值考察的实质责任，也未验证examined关系。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c6", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility.", - "reason_zh": "Assessed刻意忽略labels并依据实际适用性，因此任意标签列表在定义上等价，空列表也不能掩盖适用价值记录的缺失。这是条件化接口设计及具体遗漏探针，并非实际分类器发现全部适用责任的独立证明。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-130-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - } - ], - "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json deleted file mode 100644 index 9a2a0cd..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/fidelity.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,904 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "run_sha256": "dc8cefb44f8c2f60248302da5a7ddefc283bc711e21a4f6c84cc2eb30ae92943", - "source_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803" - }, - "initial_records": [ - { - "role": "source_initial", - "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", - "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" - }, - { - "role": "code_blind", - "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", - "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" - }, - { - "role": "code_informed_update", - "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", - "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison", - "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", - "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" - }, - { - "role": "source_initial_migration", - "path": "reviews/migration-source-initial.md", - "sha256": "6c16785adf65077a7187a18094704874c9ae09721e01a8d7d88c7d96e7eb0a11" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison_migration", - "path": "reviews/migration-source-comparison.md", - "sha256": "3691f6e7a6479436b62c927abc3b7ccb4491c1f7aa59bfc25880b52c867f75aa" - } - ], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "c-10-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-10-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-47-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-54-c1", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed.", - "reason_zh": "Consistent以整个同时持有列表推得同一context的正反结论，p/pImpliesQ/notQ实例确有联合推论。这里只表示一个问题和合并的context编号，未分开含义、假设、范围，也不是一般推论演算；义务仅被定义为谓词，未证明普遍履行。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled.", - "reason_zh": "缩减后的当前列表[.p,.pImpliesQ]在fixtureConsequence中没有否定结论，可示例说明撤回后的相容状态；未建模修订事件、前后时态关系或许可语义。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c4", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal.", - "reason_zh": "选定的撤回操作在claimsUnchanged=true时不满足ChangeReported，只演示报告约束，并未证明报告实际发生。一般List不等还包含重排或重复元素的差别，强于语义变化；对应关系仅限展示的实质撤回实例。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean.", - "reason_zh": "选定实例中，不同context编号下的相反结论不能组成同一context冲突，可展示原文“不自动构成矛盾”的区别；实际假设、含义、范围为何不同仍需在Lean之外解释。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-72-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself.", - "reason_zh": "修订在SelfAssessingSystem中实际存储ownPrinciple与samples，并以同一所属谓词计算runOwnAssessment。展示的系统在自身样本[1]上返回true，而其自身谓词在0处为假，形成有解释依据的有限自评反例。空样本也通过，加入0则拒绝；另一个恒真所属原则既通过又普遍正确。因此对应仅限此具体所属关系与测试解释：不证明每次自评都不足，也未完整编码反身性、形成/修订、适用性或对评估规则本身的评价。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-84-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c2", - "fidelity": "rejected", - "reason": "ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", - "reason_zh": "ObservationComplete只问列表是否包含所有自然数，没有观测结果、主张身份、根据关系或支持相称规则。真假算术结论仅分别与同一覆盖缺口并列，且真结论本身另有证明。未穷尽输入不等于支持不足，无观测结果的穷尽输入也不等于充分支持。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c3", - "fidelity": "rejected", - "reason": "unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty.", - "reason_zh": "unrelated_grounds_rejected因bothExamined要求编号3而拒绝编号4，只保留编号敏感性。它没有考察具体根据是否支持对应主张，没有考察结果，也没有将该记录解释为这种考察的依据。变量名examined不能建立原文责任。本版保留该受检尝试，并明确判为来源对应失败；它不能作为该原文责任的证明依据。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c5", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation.", - "reason_zh": "Duties保留同一主张/根据对上每个适用面的全称责任，经验/价值混合实例确实拒绝仅有经验记录。Aspect的三个构造子是预设应用分类，不是推导出的穷尽分类；mixed_projection展开既有责任假设，bothExamined预设记录。均未建模经验、推论、价值考察的实质责任，也未验证examined关系。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c6", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility.", - "reason_zh": "Assessed刻意忽略labels并依据实际适用性，因此任意标签列表在定义上等价，空列表也不能掩盖适用价值记录的缺失。这是条件化接口设计及具体遗漏探针，并非实际分类器发现全部适用责任的独立证明。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-130-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No mapped declaration encodes this substantive articulation, assessment-content or claim-type limitation. Duties/Aspect/record-ID fixtures cannot fill it by names or successful kernel checking.", - "reason_zh": "没有映射声明编码此实质性的可表述、考察内容或主张类型限定；Duties、Aspect及记录编号实例不能凭名称或内核通过补足它。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - } - ], - "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials. Pure relocation: source, code and original initial records have identical bytes; the preceding correspondence grades are reused, not newly blind-assessed. Migration source/method comparison is separately recorded." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md deleted file mode 100644 index b1d6d7e..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ -# Migration review export - -Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `6c2528756e18a36dfb24a5aafd8b6b499f60f41adc26c2ad78fc43dd310e7b81`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. - -# Independent candidate comparison - -Compared after preserved source-initial.md; initial source bytes matched frozen baseline. New candidate read includes Core/outer skills, philosophy-resolution, AGENTS, iteration, structure, rationale row 133 and its Chinese counterpart. The only live-source uncertainty from initial reading (new zh/AGENTS appendix) was excluded from the initial source judgment. - -## Judgment - -The revised row describes the authorized implementation change without revising philosophy 0.1.3. It keeps English text as the commitments and separates tool success from source fidelity, sufficient grounds and philosophical correctness. Ordinary assessments retain no Lean prerequisite. Revisability under this repository's objectives/constraints preserves the prior distinction between contextual design choice and philosophical obligation. The row does not state that text/tool presence proves clarity, capability or correctness. It therefore addresses the original script-free rationale rather than silently leaving an obsolete reason. - -The Chinese row preserves the same force and limits. “可复跑的形式化支持” is a contextual translation of reproducible formalization support; it does not claim every semantic judgment can be reproduced mechanically. “工具通过不确立…” retains non-sufficiency, and “前置要求” retains ordinary-assessment scope. No supported wording or translation defect identified in this row. No philosophical absorption or version change follows merely from the migration. - -New Core method owns proof/translation and Core parser support; outer methods preserve inputs and route rather than duplicate. Explicit selection and real source directory survive delegation, failed explicit/workspace lookup cannot trigger Core fallback, and standalone code explanation requires no philosophy. Maintenance rules bind changes to real dependencies and distinguish historical replay from current approval. They expressly require accurate incomplete/failed/limited/unmodeled states, not every proof passing. These provisions fit the initial responsibility boundaries. - -One concrete documentation issue: new Core run-format.md initially told users to run `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js` from the outer repository. The command is relative to Core root and fails as written from outer. Requested minimal correction to “from the Core repository.” No change to the implementation needed for this finding. - -## New rationale clauses and evidence reuse - -Seven row components are separately inventoried. The row label is structural/not applicable to proof; its six explanatory claims remain incomplete/unmodeled where no Lean declaration supports them. Their source-first review establishes that the prose can serve as authorized non-normative rationale, not that Lean has proved it. Unchanged prior definitions, theorem statements, attached old mapping hashes and code-derived explanations may be reused only if exact objects remain unchanged and the reuse is disclosed. New rationale source requires a new run/comparison object; old source snapshots and judgments remain intact. Final corpus verification is still pending; this comparison does not pre-approve future manifests or translations. - -## Actual use and limits - -See independent-skill-cases/skill-responses.md and per-command JSON. Core/outer mechanical builds and declaration audits both exit 0 with semantic_status not_evaluated after preserving an initial no-declaration rejection. Lean-only identity builds, returns its explicit premise and has no axiom dependencies. Explicit downstream baseline 0.7.2 is retained; missing explicit path fails with no Core fallback. Results support these bounded behavior checks, not whole-text fidelity or proof completeness. - -Self-check across six dimensions: consistency and responsibility allocation are preserved; required source and baseline distinctions are covered in the observed variations; runtime behavior has actual evidence for the named paths; failure cases remain visible and can rebut wider claims; no autonomous capability is inferred from added tools; thin forwarding reduces method duplication while retaining contextual review costs. No new material philosophical choice arose. Further review is justified only for the final new evidence/manuscript objects and the reported command-location correction. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index b13bca7..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/migration-source-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -# Migration review export - -Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `47a9f88895b7fa1f4366d2ba3ca8e0bf4a75ee82697745cb5673f4c3056a8376`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. - -# Independent source-first assessment - -Recorded 2026-09-13 before reading the author candidate, new Lean code, author reports, or reader verdicts. Reviewer received the raw objective and existing Core philosophy/rationale/methods plus the two current outer Lean skills. The live Chinese AGENTS read already contains a Lean-reader section; it is excluded from this initial source judgment because its timing is uncertain. - -## Fixed source and objective - -Core `PHILOSOPHY.md` declares philosophy/core 0.1.3, format 0.1.0. The English text, including meanings and limits, is the assessment authority. Move Lean implementation and tools into Core, retain outer entrypoints, synchronize actual dependencies and corresponding Chinese text, and report accurate individual statuses without a quota requiring all proofs to pass. This is authorized implementation maintenance, not adoption of a changed philosophy. - -## Original-source judgment and row 133 - -Rationale row 133 currently chooses “A text-centered core and script-free skills.” Its contextual reason is a thin, inspectable text layer without an execution framework; its limit explicitly says that script absence is a design choice and other applications may reasonably use tools. This is non-normative explanatory rationale, not a timeless philosophical prohibition. Core AGENTS currently says delivered core/skills remain text-only. The new explicit objective replaces that implementation constraint within this scope. Merely deleting row 133 would lose the reason/limit distinction: revise it to explain inspectable English commitments plus optional, revisable Lean implementations/tools, justified by source correspondence and reproducible bounded evidence. Preserve that text/tools do not establish clarity, capability, philosophical truth, or universal necessity. Do not describe Lean as part of the philosophical authority or require ordinary assessments to formalize their inputs. - -## Responsibility and dependency boundaries - -- Philosophy 2.1 requires appropriate support for empirical, inferential and value aspects; mechanical checking supplies conditional inferential evidence and cannot certify empirical adequacy or adopted values. -- Philosophy 1.3 forbids concealing changed judgments/conditions; frozen historical results and current stale status must coexist accurately. -- Philosophy 1.4 preserves self-application conditions and rejects self-proof; independent review is the repository method, not a philosophical theorem. -- Philosophy 2.4 requires reasons for the migration and retains alternatives. Central ownership can reduce duplicated implementation while keeping public wrappers; names and Core placement supply no extra authority. -- Existing assess owns compatibility; absorb owns adoption; principled-review returns six-dimension findings; wording review owns language quality only. Lean proof owns inventory, encoding, dependency audit and conditional mechanical result; natural-language skill explains code and compares correspondence without silently upgrading it. -- Current outer proof skill uses outer resolver, parser/checker and references. Relocation must inspect their real imports and data paths, preserve explicit selected baselines, reject invalid explicit paths without fallback, and retain standalone syntax explanation without requiring a philosophical baseline. -- A successful build/audit is not source fidelity. Missing independent review remains incomplete/provisional. Accepted fragments stay limited; rejected correspondence can fail despite a successful build; unsupported/unfinished does not mean false. Verified countermodels can support non-entailment and must not mark the refuted implication as passed. -- Synchronize source/baseline/code/review/manuscript bindings when those dependencies change. Preserve historical evidence and never overwrite hashes to make old evidence current. Structural or wording-only unrelated changes must not require pretending all prior formal claims changed. - -## Six-dimension initial assessment - -Consistency: migration is compatible if the old script-free policy is explicitly updated and authority/status distinctions survive. Minimal completeness: preserve both entrypoints, reference assets, ordinary-text partitioning, explicit-baseline failure behavior and whole-claim/unmodeled coverage; do not use a path-only check as evidence of runtime usability. External adequacy: executable paths, installed toolchain and portable packages need actual checks; currently unknown. Rebuttal: a code-only explanation wrongly resolving philosophy, a changed source shown current, or a rejected mapping shown passed refutes the corresponding implementation claim. Self-transcendence: implementation revisability supports the authorized change but does not prove improvement; the static Lean artifact need not have autonomous orientation. Occam: one Core implementation with narrow outer delegation is preferable if functionality and boundaries are preserved; mechanical duplication merely renamed is not established simplification. - -## Independent small cases, registered before candidate - -Case A — ordinary source: “A workshop values preserving an existing craft. This commitment does not require every implementation to use its oldest tool.” Apply proof workflow to this two-sentence ordinary-text object. Preserve both clauses with nonoverlapping local IDs; distinguish commitment from limit/non-entailment; no metadata injection and no automatic adoption of the source. Any completed proof is conditional on an explicitly explained encoding. Missing review means incomplete rather than passed. - -Case B — Lean-only snippet: `theorem retained (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h`. Apply natural-language entrypoint in both Core and outer with no source prose or adopted baseline. Explain that P is already an explicit premise, conclusion supplied by h, and no independent support or source fidelity is established. A code-only explanation is possible even if no philosophy resolves; mark kernel result unverified unless actual checking runs. - -Case C — baseline variation: repeat A with an explicit downstream baseline file, then an explicit nonexistent baseline path. Retain the valid selected baseline and its directory/version; invalid explicit selection must stop the dependent compatibility stage without silently using bundled Core, while source inventory can continue. A later changed maintained baseline makes a current reader judgment stale, not its frozen theorem false. - -Self-check: these are method/implementation acceptance boundaries, not extra philosophical commitments. Source-only initial assessment cannot certify candidate runtime behavior, translation or semantic fidelity. No candidate verdict is issued yet. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md deleted file mode 100644 index fab352a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-current.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `cb99ad55a0e4dad0f45f74ef91d279313333a2571a48e0d3856670ad2734272b`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 第二轮：两个修订对应的独立复评 - -日期：2026-09-13。仅复评c-83-c2和r-121-c4；旧初评、第一轮比较及其四项拒绝判断全部保留，不改写历史。本轮两个新版本均判断partial，详见mapped-judgments-round2.json中的逐条双语理由。c-89-c2和c-94-c3没有修正相关语义，继续rejected。 - -## 新证据与判断变化 - -c-83-c2：SelfAssessingSystem现在实际持有ownPrinciple和samples，runOwnAssessment确实计算同一所属谓词在自身样本上的结果。sampleSystem的[1]通过而0反驳其普遍正确，原先“只有名称、没有对象所属关系与实际考察”的缺口已在这个狭窄解释中补足。因此由rejected改为partial。仍没有形成/修订、适用条件、对评估规则本身的评估或全部反身性；不能从这个实例宣称任何自评都失败或自评永远不能支持正确结论。 - -r-121-c4：删除updateInvalidating实现修复示例，新增originalStates/revisedStates和实际compareReads。direct与cachedRead不变，修订的是比较状态集合，结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)，与本句的评估范围修订有直接有限对应。因此由rejected改为partial。它只是一个静态案例与一个变化案例，未建模一般测试运行器、任意序列、并发或所有回归案例。 - -## 自选实际边界变体 - -所有源码快照、探针、完整重跑命令、首次失败和实际输出保存在reader-round2-probes/。不是仅列计划或手动推断。 - -1. Core：把samples改为空列表，runOwnAssessment返回true，但所属谓词仍在0处为假；把samples改为[1,0]返回false；另建恒真所属谓词，测试返回true且能证明全部输入正确。四个实际输出为(true,true,false,true)，顺序为空样本、原实例、含反例样本、恒真原则。通过可以空泛，也可以与错误或正确并存，是否有实质支持仍需要解释采样和主张范围。 -2. Rationale：compareReads在空状态列表输出[]，仅initial输出[(10,10)]，加入updateOnly initial 10仍只有相同对，真实revisedStates输出[(10,10),(11,10)]。另实际证明initial属于revisedStates。评估修订的可见贡献依赖加入相关变化，不由列表更长或“revised”名称保证。 - -这些边界不要求扩大公布模型。它们要求公布措辞保留“选定非空实例”“加入11这一相关变化”“有限反例/有限比较”，不把样本通过说成完整自评能力，也不把任意新增案例说成改进。 - -## 实际运行与限制 - -首次尝试在两个工程执行lake env lean并导入模块，均因工程搜索路径无对应olean返回1；Lake同时自动创建了此前不存在的lake-manifest.json。未假装首次运行通过。随后将所读完整源码快照与探针体拼接成两个独立Lean文件，使用固定Lean4.33.1二进制检查，均返回0并输出上述结果。这同时检查了源声明与新探针，无需依赖一个未知的新旧构建产物。实际结果含恢复过程和快照hash。 - -本轮未修改维护源码、run.json、原初评或第一轮判断。除Lake自动生成manifest外，新增文件仅在忽略的P下。无需重复已通过探针；后续若文稿宣称超出上述范围，应作为新的具体措辞/对应问题审查。没有full判断或哲学正确性认证。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index 19ae64a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `37695a48276f635e264f19ccc07bef559600946518835eef37029ab18c7b3a1d`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 原文初评与已披露编码比较 - -日期：2026-09-13。比较者：reader_source_initial。本轮是在source-initial.md和source-inventory.json冻结后进行的知情比较；不修改两份初评文件。基线仍为Core 0.1.3英文正本及当前rationale。已读取两个run.json、两个完整Lean源文件、encoding-preregistration.md，以及两份entry-data的全部映射条目。输入hash单独保存在comparison-input-hashes.json。 - -## 判断 - -16个已映射源子句中，12项支持有限对应（partial），4项拒绝当前对应（rejected）。另记录15项实质未编码内容为pending，108项结构或表格角色/名称为not_applicable。无full判断。mapped-judgments.json提供逐项英文及中文理由，id使用clause_id；clause=null则使用entry_id。未列出的实质主张应由汇总者明确标为pending并说明没有编码，不能因为条目缺席视为通过。 - -构建与依赖审计通过是调用者披露的机械结果；本轮未重复构建。所有保真判断来自实际定义、完整定理陈述与源文对应，不来自build状态。没有把未建模判为哲学缺陷。 - -## 四项当前对应应撤回或修订 - -1. c-89-c2：ObservationComplete只表示列表覆盖全部自然数，不含观测结果、主张、根据和支持关系。因此observation_gap及真假结论并列定理均不能表示“根据支持与主张强度/范围相称”。尤其真结论n+0=n已有独立证明，不能因列表未覆盖全部自然数称它支持不足；反过来只有输入覆盖也不保证观测内容为真或相关。预注册的“coverage sufficiency criterion”并未以证据与结论的关系实现，而且若被视为一般充分支持会改变原义。最小修正是撤回这四项对c-89-c2的映射，保留未映射的算术/覆盖示例；若要重新映射，需要明确的仅凭观测记录的蕴涵模型及额外假设，不能以名称补足。 -2. c-94-c3：unrelated_grounds_rejected仅因bothExamined要求grounds=3而拒绝4，证明的是记录编号不匹配。它没有实现“考察那些根据是否支持相应主张”。允许examined作为外部关系的条件化接口，不等于具体编号等式已经有考察语义。应撤回对这句实质考察责任的映射，保留编号完整性探针。c-94-c5/c6可保留为条件化责任分配和分类标签无免责效力的有限接口。 -3. c-83-c2：self_assessment_not_correctness是样本1通过、输入0失败的局部测试反例。没有系统、它的评估原则或将同一评估原则用于自身的行为；selfAssessmentSamples只是名称。应撤回当前自评对应，或建立有解释依据的自评对象与行为实例。这个算术结果可有限说明局部通过不能保证普遍正确，但后者不等同于原文的反身对象关系。 -4. r-121-c4：invalidation_restores_fixture修改了实现，令acknowledged与cached同步；原文此句说修订评估方法，比较两个候选的update–read序列并保留静态案例。不能把修复实现当成修订评估方法。最小修正是将映射改为实际update_read_counterexample加original_comparison/unchanged_update_retained，并仍标partial；正向失效更新实例可保留为额外候选示例，不能凭它证明测试集合保留或评估流程已形式化。 - -## 有限成立之处及保留界限 - -- 实际类型叫Aspect，具有empirical/inferential/value三个构造子，源码没有Kind声明。这是应用预设分类而非完整认识论分类的证明。Duties保留同一claim/grounds对及每个实际适用面的责任；mixed_projection只是由已假设的Duties投影，不构成外部责任已履行的证据。bothExamined及empiricalOnly是编号/标签记录，未实现经验考察的不确定性、推论支持关系或价值批评责任。标签遗漏反例能说明该接口的责任不随labels变化，不能证明真实适用分类已穷尽。 -- Consistent的整个held列表可产生联合后果，p/pImpliesQ/notQ确实触发一个context的正反结论；撤回及不同context示例提供有限对应。context把问题/假设/含义/范围折叠，推论关系是一个预设实例而非通用逻辑系统。ChangeReported只在实质撤回实例中对应明确；一般List不等会把重排或重复也视为变化，不能泛称语义变化判定器。 -- R1：namedUniversalTruth明确为h:P推出P，不是无条件普遍真理。0≤1与被2反驳的∀n,n≤1构成条件/量词改变的具体反例，支持“证明这个陈述不能自动建立另一个陈述”的有限说明。different_statement_refuted确实断言这个选定更强命题为假；这可以是具体见证，但中文英文解释均须避免提升为“凡对应失败，散文主张必假”。未编码一般证明可靠性、任意编码对应或哲学承诺的真假。r-77-c1与c4仍未映射。 -- 软件初态10/10、预算6下时延5/2均合格；updateOnly改为11后缓存仍10，直接读取11。它们实现源案例的一个明确反例，未建模真实时延、并发或全部故障。budget3是另一情境，预算定理仅覆盖r-119-c2合取义务的时延部分，新鲜度责任仍未表达。 -- 当前rationale.L120（r-120-c2至c6）没有任何声明映射，旧method-stage对应已撤回；这是正确保留缺口。此处的Grounds/Consistency/Reflexivity/可审查性推论不能由算术状态定理替代。r-119-c1与r-120-c1等“Additional premises”“Inference”只是表格角色，已标not_applicable。 - -## 范围与自检 - -本轮对所有16个已映射子句逐项检查了实际声明；未宣称全部未映射子句已做同等深度编码评审。结构、表格角色名称与实质论断分开，源文仍完整保留。模型失败不改写原文；既有初评与hash不变。判断标准没有因作者声明“checked”或“limited”而降低，partial也不意味着完整子句已被证明。有限接口可作为可读实例；错误的直接对应应修正而不是仅靠总体免责声明稀释。 - -没有必要递归委派或重跑相同构建。后续仅需比较有实质变化的映射/编码和文稿陈述，并分别保留原判与新判。未执行维护文件修改或哲学采用。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index 90b1632..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/source-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,47 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `5a292830b2fdb6e0670049bf56bbb278416fd2418272e4d586bd8f0f904386b8`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Independent source-only initial assessment — frozen - -Date: 2026-09-13. Reviewer: reader_source_initial. This record precedes disclosure of any current candidate encoding, author verdict, or expected comparison result. Selected baseline: `OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md` philosophy/core 0.1.3, English authority. Companion: `OrganonCore/docs/rationale.md`, non-normative. Goal supplied by caller: faithful limited Lean formalization and two-granularity English/Chinese explanations covering the 22 Core text units and the complete rationale. No candidate has been assessed here, and this is not an adoption judgment. - -## Provenance and limits of independence - -Read the supplied Core AGENTS, PHILOSOPHY and rationale in full; RTK instructions; assess, principled-review, wording-review, shared iteration and philosophy-resolution instructions; translation guidance. No candidate code, author rationale, prior detailed review, blind translation, or archive package was opened. AGENTS instructed starting local records from ACTIVE.md; reading that index incidentally exposed one-line historical task summaries, including an earlier description of Assessment as an accepted conditional normative interface. Those summaries are not source evidence and are not used to determine this judgment. This limited exposure prevents claiming complete ignorance of historical verdict metadata. Exact source clauses, not that summary, ground the distinctions below. No recursive delegation occurred. - -## Initial judgment and expected fidelity boundaries - -The source supports a limited formal interpretation of selected responsibility and support relations, if the interpretation explicitly preserves normative force, applicability, and the distinction between supporting a claim and examining its support. It does not supply a complete formal ontology, inference calculus, support metric, or source-to-model correspondence proof. The success of a Lean check could establish an encoded statement under its assumptions; its relevance to the prose remains a separate judgment. Unknown correspondence is not a pass, a core conflict, or proof that the source is defective. - -1. Core preamble: adopted commitments, meanings, and application limits constitute the authority; they are not descriptive laws of every system. Charter and Grounds mutually constrain each other without priority or deductive hierarchy. Rationale and contextual skill requirements must retain their separate status. -2. Self-Transcendence: expansion is valued, not merely allowed. Organization, methods and principles remain revisable. Orientation, permission, actual change and supported achievement are different. Universal nonfinality within the relevant existing forms does not impose change on every action, guarantee progress, exclude justified stability, or demand independence from external help. -3. Internal Consistency: preserve simultaneous holding and implications, same question, assumptions, meanings and scope. Changing or withdrawing a judgment may remove co-holding; concealed redefinition cannot erase a prior contradiction. Tension is not yet contradiction. Compatibility cannot stand for correctness, adequacy or inferential entailment. -4. Reflexivity: both system and formation/application/revision of principles are assessment and generation objects, subject to their applicable conditions. No self exemption when conditions hold, no unconditional application of every principle to itself. Self-application and internally produced revision do not establish correctness or sufficient grounds. -5. Grounds and Assessment: articulability identifies concepts, assumptions, reasons and limits. Assessment examines whether those grounds support the corresponding claim; completing it may establish insufficient support. It must not be encoded as an obligation to obtain a successful support verdict, nor as a completed marker lacking claim/grounds/conditions correspondence. Each applicable mixed aspect retains its responsibility even without a classification tag. Empirical assessment examines evidence/performance plus support conditions, scope and uncertainty; inferential assessment examines assumptions and inferential relations; value assessment states position, reasons, limits and consequences and stays open to relevant criticism. An initial value commitment need not prove every starting assumption. The general proportionate-support constraint limits claims; it does not guarantee all assessed claims are supported. -6. Scope and tools: local agreement cannot establish unconditional universals or absence of omitted differences. Measurement, repetition and frameworks can be useful but form no universally mandatory chain. A verifiable unreproduced observation may offer limited support; stochastic output identity and stability of conclusions are different. -7. Capability claims: application-specific definitions and conditions determine the actual claim. External evidence may support a capability without internal explanation; reliable output does not automatically establish understanding. An application may explicitly require explanation. Counts alone do not establish expansion. Narrowing a definition creates a new claim and cannot retroactively prove the old one. -8. Choice commitment: relevant reasons connect priority to objectives, values and constraints. Name, convention or status alone are insufficient; tradition may embody an explicitly adopted value with a relevant connection. This additional commitment is not derived merely from grouping it under Grounds. Openness does not imply equivalence, multiple feasible means, mandatory novelty, or rejection of established methods. Internal method properties may matter. -9. Relationships and terms: retain all foregoing distinctions under mutual application; no self-proof follows. “Assessment” includes reasons, applicability and observed performance and is not limited to executable tests. Read that list with the type-appropriate assessment responsibilities rather than silently making empirical outcome evidence mandatory for every claim type. -10. Rationale: preserve arguments’ premises, objections and limits, historical placement assertions as assertions of this text, and all illustrative cases. Removal checks concern loss of an explicit contribution, expressly not formal independence. Hypothetical research/software examples add contextual values and constraints; potential contributions and bounded support are not actual proof of domain-wide improvement. Repository tools, English authority, independent-first review and records are contextual arrangements rather than philosophical theorems. -11. Formal-proof example (rationale line 77): the hypothesis includes a checked proof whose encoding changes the claim’s conditions or claim-to-grounds relation. Its encoded statement is established relative to assumptions and proof dependencies, but this does not thereby establish the different prose claim. Correspondence failure is initially a modeling finding, not itself a reason to revise the commitment. A formalization must keep checked derivation, source interpretation and support relevance separately reviewable. Non-entailment must not be replaced by falsity of the prose conclusion. - -## Questions not fixed by the source - -- “Intrinsic orientation when expansion is regarded as worth pursuing” supplies an intended meaning but no measurable criterion or complete equivalence schema. A model’s precise predicate/definition is an interpretation to disclose. -- Contradiction, relevant implications, and the admissible inference calculus are not algorithmically fixed. Selecting classical proposition logic, a finite claim domain, or a closure rule adds modeling choices. -- Proportionate support has no universal numerical or ordered scale in the text. Claim/grounds correspondence and sufficient support require interpreted relations and contextual evidence; their names alone cannot establish them. -- Applicable aspects are not supplied as an exhaustive classification algorithm. A finite aspect datatype can be a bounded application interface only if its coverage limits and unclassified cases are explicit. -- The Assessment terminology row does not define a formal selector for when observed-performance examination applies. Its claim-appropriate context rules out silently making empirical evidence a universal prerequisite; an exact selector remains an additional interpretation. -- The proof example contains no concrete model or correspondence test; it cannot determine an unseen candidate’s fidelity. The software example does not fully specify concurrency semantics or all workloads; the research example supplies no actual study results. These are bounded examples, not omissions to fill as source commitments. -- The rationale’s external simplicity-source attribution has been preserved but not independently fact-checked in this source-only task. No judgment about the external article’s accuracy is offered. - -These are interpretation and support boundaries, not established contradictions in the philosophy. None authorizes changing the adopted commitments. - -## Coverage and bounded self-check - -`source-inventory.json` preserves exact text and line numbers for every nonempty source line, including every paragraph, table row, heading, ID and metadata line. Each substantive entry has a source-specific initial reading of force, conditions, intended contribution and unresolved questions, plus first-pass clause splits and force/scope markers. Splitting is not a formal parse; nested semantic clauses can remain. Structural rows carry no independent philosophical obligations. The Core has exactly 22 stable IDs: 20 directly contain substantive text and two (`organon.charter`, `organon.relationships`) are structural groupings. They must not be populated with invented commitments merely to match a count. - -Actual checks: the inventory contains 202 exact nonempty lines (Core 99; rationale 103), with 119 substantive paragraph/table entries. These are documentary coverage checks, not whole-text semantic-completeness certification. No model, proof, bilingual candidate or actual reader outcome was inspected. No claim is made about universal adequacy, formal independence, minimality, or philosophical truth. - -Bounded review of this record: consistency checked by keeping responsibilities separate from successful outcomes and current commitments separate from contextual methods; completeness is limited to the supplied source and first-pass clause readings; external adequacy of hypothetical cases cannot be inferred without actual evidence; a concrete correspondence counterexample can revise a later candidate judgment; a static inventory need not display a system’s generative orientation; no comparative parsimony advantage is claimed without a comparable alternative. An initial inventory is useful as a traceable baseline, not sufficient as fidelity evidence. Stop here until candidate disclosure supplies new evidence. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index eadcbc7..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/reviews/summary.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,39 +0,0 @@ -# Reported source fidelity - -These are reported semantic judgments, not kernel conclusions. Initial records precede comparison; revised mappings have informed follow-up judgments. Two rejected attempts have editorial current-result wording; their original independent reasons and verdicts remain in the initial comparison export. The bound records and exact object hashes are listed in fidelity.json. Unmodeled entries remain pending; structure is not a philosophical theorem. - -## c-54-c1 — partial - -Consistent checks both polarities from the entire held list at one context; the concrete p/pImpliesQ/notQ rule supplies a joint consequence. It represents one question and a collapsed context identifier, not separate meanings/assumptions/scopes or a general consequence calculus; the normative obligation is encoded as a predicate, not proved universally obeyed. - -## c-59-c2 — partial - -The reduced current list [.p,.pImpliesQ] has no negative consequence in fixtureConsequence, illustrating a compatible result after withdrawal. No revision event, earlier/current time relation or permission semantics is modeled. - -## c-59-c4 — partial - -The chosen removal makes ChangeReported false when claimsUnchanged=true. This is a reporting-constraint interface, not evidence that reporting occurred. General before/after List inequality is stronger than semantic change because reordering or duplicates also differ; the accepted correspondence is limited to the displayed substantive removal. - -## c-61-c2 — partial - -Opposite polarities at distinct context IDs cannot form a same-context conflict in the selected fixture. This witnesses the source non-automatic-contradiction distinction, while what makes actual assumptions/meanings/scopes different remains interpreted outside Lean. - -## c-83-c2 — partial - -The revision now stores an actual ownPrinciple and samples in SelfAssessingSystem and computes runOwnAssessment from that same owned predicate. The displayed system returns true on its own sample [1] while its own predicate is false at 0, supplying an interpreted finite self-assessment counterexample. Empty samples also pass, adding 0 rejects, and an always-true owned principle both passes and is universally correct. Thus the correspondence is limited to this concrete ownership/testing interpretation: it proves neither every self-assessment inadequate nor complete reflexivity, formation/revision, applicability or evaluation of the assessment rule itself. - -## c-89-c2 — rejected - -ObservationComplete only asks whether every natural number occurs in a list. It contains no observation outcomes, claim identity, grounds relation or proportional-support rule. The true/false arithmetic conclusions merely coexist with the same coverage gap; indeed the true arithmetic conclusion has an independent proof. Missing exhaustive coverage is not by itself insufficient support, and exhaustive input coverage without outcomes is not sufficient support. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. - -## c-94-c3 — rejected - -unrelated_grounds_rejected rejects numeric ID 4 because bothExamined requires ID 3. This preserves identity sensitivity only; there is no examination of whether specific grounds support the corresponding claim, no outcome and no interpreted basis for treating the record as such an examination. It cannot establish this source duty merely by the name examined. This edition retains the checked attempt as a rejected source correspondence; it is not evidence for this source duty. - -## c-94-c5 — partial - -Duties preserves forall applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, and empirical-only records fail for the concrete empirical/value fixture. Aspect has three constructors; it is a stipulated application ontology, not a derived exhaustive classification. mixed_projection projects an assumed duty and bothExamined stipulates records. None models the substantive empirical/inferential/value assessment responsibilities or validates the examined relation. - -## c-94-c6 — partial - -Assessed deliberately ignores labels while using actual applicability, so any two label lists are definitionally equivalent and an empty list cannot hide a missing applicable value record. This is a conditional interface design and concrete omission probe, not an independent proof that a real classifier found every applicable responsibility. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json deleted file mode 100644 index 90c9802..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/run.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,1345 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "source": { - "kind": "organon", - "path": "snapshots/source.md", - "snapshot": "snapshots/source.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", - "metadata": { - "format_version": "0.1.0", - "philosophy_version": "0.1.3", - "core_version": "0.1.3", - "derived_from": null - } - }, - "baseline": { - "path": "snapshots/philosophy.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" - }, - "project": { - "path": "leanified", - "root_module": "CoreReader" - }, - "preregistration": { - "path": "PREREGISTERED.md", - "sha256": "566dbb98e64acce0e25f454c5a890a4280eff60d3684b5f54b1164933804c263" - }, - "units": [ - { - "id": "organon.preamble", - "hash": "450b06d19fd0e8d4975923efa2d02c47ee1faeafad89f5dd5a4a3ce76828dd5f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-10-c1", - "claim": "This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-10-c2", - "claim": "It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c1", - "claim": "The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c2", - "claim": "The charter and Grounds constrain one another;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c3", - "claim": "their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-12-c4", - "claim": "Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Structural heading with no independently modeled claim.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.overview", - "hash": "75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-22-c1", - "claim": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-22-c2", - "claim": "It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c1", - "claim": "The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-24-c2", - "claim": "The provisions below specify the conditions for each.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", - "hash": "f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-29-c1", - "claim": "A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-29-c2", - "claim": "It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", - "hash": "7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-34-c1", - "claim": "A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c2", - "claim": "A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-34-c3", - "claim": "Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", - "hash": "4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-39-c1", - "claim": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c2", - "claim": "“Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c3", - "claim": "These remain within the scope of possible change;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-39-c4", - "claim": "their revisability does not guarantee actual progress.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", - "hash": "6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-44-c1", - "claim": "Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c2", - "claim": "Having the orientation does not guarantee progress.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-44-c3", - "claim": "Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c1", - "claim": "“Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-46-c2", - "claim": "it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-47-c1", - "claim": "Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c1", - "claim": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-48-c2", - "claim": "Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c1", - "claim": "Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-49-c2", - "claim": "a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.consistency", - "hash": "c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-54-c1", - "claim": "The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.Consistent", - "CoreReader.joint_conflict" - ] - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "hash": "81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-59-c1", - "claim": "“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c2", - "claim": "Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment;", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set" - ] - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c3", - "claim": "old and new principles need not remain compatible forever.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-59-c4", - "claim": "When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.ChangeReported", - "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report" - ] - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c1", - "claim": "“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c2", - "claim": "Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.distinct_contexts" - ] - }, - { - "id": "c-61-c3", - "claim": "Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", - "hash": "4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-66-c1", - "claim": "Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-66-c2", - "claim": "Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c1", - "claim": "Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-67-c2", - "claim": "A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity", - "hash": "13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-72-c1", - "claim": "A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", - "hash": "8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-77-c1", - "claim": "Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c2", - "claim": "Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-77-c3", - "claim": "The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "hash": "ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-82-c1", - "claim": "Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c2", - "claim": "When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-82-c3", - "claim": "Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c1", - "claim": "Self-application does not constitute self-proof.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-83-c2", - "claim": "Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness" - ] - }, - { - "id": "c-84-c1", - "claim": "That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.grounds", - "hash": "4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-89-c1", - "claim": "The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-89-c2", - "claim": "The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", - "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion" - ] - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "hash": "2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Selected worked fragments only; not a proof of the full source unit.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-94-c1", - "claim": "Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c2", - "claim": "Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c3", - "claim": "Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected" - ] - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c4", - "claim": "Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c5", - "claim": "When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.Duties", - "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected" - ] - }, - { - "id": "c-94-c6", - "claim": "Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility.", - "declarations": [ - "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected" - ] - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c1", - "claim": "Empirical claim", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c2", - "claim": "Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-98-c3", - "claim": "Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c1", - "claim": "Inferential claim", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c2", - "claim": "Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-99-c3", - "claim": "Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c1", - "claim": "Value commitment", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c2", - "claim": "State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-100-c3", - "claim": "Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c1", - "claim": "Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c2", - "claim": "they need not prove all their own starting assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c3", - "claim": "The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-102-c4", - "claim": "Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.grounds.scope", - "hash": "4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-107-c1", - "claim": "Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c2", - "claim": "A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-107-c3", - "claim": "A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c1", - "claim": "Measurement can make some differences comparable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c2", - "claim": "Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c3", - "claim": "Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-109-c4", - "claim": "Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c1", - "claim": "An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-111-c2", - "claim": "The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities", - "hash": "7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-116-c1", - "claim": "Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c2", - "claim": "The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-116-c3", - "claim": "Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c1", - "claim": "Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c2", - "claim": "Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c3", - "claim": "Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c4", - "claim": "it does not automatically establish understanding of that process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-118-c5", - "claim": "Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.grounds.implementations", - "hash": "bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-123-c1", - "claim": "The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-123-c2", - "claim": "Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c1", - "claim": "This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c2", - "claim": "Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-125-c3", - "claim": "Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", - "hash": "db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-130-c1", - "claim": "Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c1", - "claim": "A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-131-c2", - "claim": "They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c1", - "claim": "Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-132-c2", - "claim": "Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c1", - "claim": "Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-133-c2", - "claim": "Relevant reasons may still give it priority.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Structural heading with no independently modeled claim.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships.roles", - "hash": "24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-141-c1", - "claim": "The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c2", - "claim": "Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c3", - "claim": "Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c4", - "claim": "Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-141-c5", - "claim": "Each commitment needs its own reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c1", - "claim": "Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c2", - "claim": "Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c3", - "claim": "A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c4", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-143-c5", - "claim": "Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c1", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c2", - "claim": "Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c3", - "claim": "The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c4", - "claim": "The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-145-c5", - "claim": "Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "organon.relationships.terms", - "hash": "0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for the source obligations or arguments.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "c-152-c1", - "claim": "Existing form", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-152-c2", - "claim": "The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c1", - "claim": "Assessment", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c2", - "claim": "Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - }, - { - "id": "c-153-c3", - "claim": "not limited to executable tests.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No checked faithful encoding is supplied for this source clause; the full source remains available for review." - } - ] - } - ], - "declarations": [ - { - "name": "CoreReader.Duties", - "kind": "definition", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c5" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c5" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c6" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c5" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c5" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c3" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", - "clause": "c-94-c6" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.Consistent", - "kind": "definition", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", - "clause": "c-54-c1" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.joint_conflict", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", - "clause": "c-54-c1" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-59-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-61-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.ChangeReported", - "kind": "definition", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-59-c4" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", - "clause": "c-59-c4" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.ObservationComplete", - "kind": "definition", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds", - "clause": "c-89-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds", - "clause": "c-89-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds", - "clause": "c-89-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.grounds", - "clause": "c-89-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness", - "kind": "case", - "file": "CoreReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", - "clause": "c-83-c2" - } - ] - } - ], - "cases": [ - { - "id": "mixed_projection", - "declaration": "CoreReader.mixed_projection", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "labels_do_not_waive", - "declaration": "CoreReader.labels_do_not_waive", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "complete_mixed_fixture", - "declaration": "CoreReader.complete_mixed_fixture", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "empirical_only_rejected", - "declaration": "CoreReader.empirical_only_rejected", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "unrelated_grounds_rejected", - "declaration": "CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "omitted_labels_still_rejected", - "declaration": "CoreReader.omitted_labels_still_rejected", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "joint_conflict", - "declaration": "CoreReader.joint_conflict", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "withdrawn_current_set", - "declaration": "CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "distinct_contexts", - "declaration": "CoreReader.distinct_contexts", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "changed_set_needs_report", - "declaration": "CoreReader.changed_set_needs_report", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "observation_gap", - "declaration": "CoreReader.observation_gap", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "gap_with_true_conclusion", - "declaration": "CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "gap_with_false_conclusion", - "declaration": "CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "self_assessment_not_correctness", - "declaration": "CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - } - ] -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md deleted file mode 100644 index 3705ff1..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/snapshots/philosophy.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,153 +0,0 @@ ---- -format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.3 -core_version: 0.1.3 -derived_from: null ---- -# Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds - - -This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. - -The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. - -## 1. Charter - - -### 1.1 Overview - - -**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** - -> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. - -The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. - -### 1.2 Self-Transcendence - - -> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. - -#### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation - - -A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. - -#### 1.2.2 Non-finality - - -Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. - -#### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits - - -Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. - -- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. -- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. -- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. -- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. - -### 1.3 Internal Consistency - - -> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. - -#### 1.3.1 Meaning - - -“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. - -“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. - -#### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits - - -- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. -- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. - -### 1.4 Reflexivity - - -> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. - -#### 1.4.1 Meaning - - -Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. - -#### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits - - -- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. -- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. -- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. - -## 2. Grounds - - -> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. - -### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment - - -Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. - -| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | -| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | -| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | - -Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. - -### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement - - -Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. - -Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. - -An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. - -### 2.3 Capability Claims - - -Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. - -Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. - -### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives - - -> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. - -This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. - -#### 2.4.1 Conditions and Limits - - -- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. -- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. -- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. -- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. - -## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms - - -### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints - - -The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. - -Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. - -Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. - -### 3.2 Necessary Terms - - -| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | -| --- | --- | -| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | -| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md deleted file mode 100644 index a65a742..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED-original.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -# New compact models — registered before Lean authoring - -These are new bounded encodings for readable evidence, not unchanged replays of all older projects. Historical Core/Rationale models remain untouched; unretained results do not silently become current results. Inventory all original content, map only explicit selected fragments. No whole philosophical text is expected to be proved. - -Core fragments: responsibility quantified over actual applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, independently of labels; domain relation supplied and not self-validating. Preserve empirical/value mixed applicability via concrete claim-aspect fixture and wrong-grounds/reported-label variants. The full articulation, basis quality, proportionality, value criticism and all listed empirical/inferential duties remain unmodeled by this narrower interface; do not label whole Assessment passed. Separate sufficient support from truth using a finite observation set with an explicitly stated universal-coverage sufficiency criterion for all natural inputs; bounded observations cannot establish a universal property, whether the property is actually true or false. - -Consistency: whole held-set input to an explicit consequence relation, context/question/polarity; a concrete P, P→Q, ¬Q fixture uses a registered one-step consequence for this case, not a general logical calculus. Joint inconsistency, removal of ¬Q, and opposite judgments under distinct contexts get actual probes. A separate changed-content reporting obligation is an interface, not an assertion a real change was reported. - -Reflexivity: concrete arithmetic principle n+1=2*n checked on sample1 can pass while counterexample0 refutes it; evaluating oneself is a separate recorded action. This supplies a relevant finite counterexample to self-assessment alone implying correctness, not a general diagnosis of every system or proof that the normative provision is obeyed. - -Rationale R1: actual conditional identity theorem h:P⊢P plus a true coded arithmetic claim and false different prose claim; exact arithmetic counterexample illustrates that a proof of one statement does not prove a different stronger statement. Missing bridge is a modeling finding, not proof that philosophical commitments fail. It is an illustration of the accepted R1 row, never a mathematical proof of every prose correspondence judgment. - -Rationale software/L119: ServiceState contains acknowledged and cached natural values; direct read reads acknowledged, cache reads cached; updateOnly changes acknowledged and retains cached. Initial10/10, original latencies5/2,budget6 both acceptable; update11 yields11/10. Original-match plus later-mismatch witnesses failure of global equivalence. Positive invalidating update sets both11; unchanged update10 retains agreement. Withdraw any mapping to method-stage lists. Separate tightened budget3 is a different context, not the original case. - -Rationale removal arguments and value/historical/general method effectiveness claims remain source-inventoried but unproved unless a reviewed direct correspondence is available. No Boolean encoding of arbitrary truth values substitutes for an empirical or value argument. All new declarations and cases will be root-imported and audited with fixed Lean4.33.1/core; no project axioms or sorry. - -Source initial and code-only explanation are independent roles. Initial coding model tests may precede fidelity acceptance, but published passed/limited states require the recorded corresponding review. New model tradeoff: intentionally small exact worked fragments for readers instead of importing large legacy interfaces with stale provenance; report reduced retained proof coverage, not a formalization improvement by line count. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md deleted file mode 100644 index b21df5a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/PREREGISTERED.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -# New rationale object for Core-owned Lean tooling - -The original encoding preregistration is preserved in PREREGISTERED-original.md. The migration acceptance cases were fixed before implementation. This new run follows the narrowly authorized replacement of rationale line133: text remains the philosophical authority, tooling supplies reproducible formalization support, neither text nor tool success establishes the listed adequacy claims, and Lean remains optional for ordinary assessment. The changed row has no theorem mappings: record its seven source clauses, with its label inapplicable and its six substantive clauses unmodeled. Do not change code, other source clauses, proof assumptions, or prior source grades to obtain success. - -Retain the original rationale run and judgments as historical evidence. Reuse exact unchanged Lean code and its initial backtranslation with reuse disclosed; compare original-source initial review to the new explanatory row, then bind the new source/run/review/manuscript objects. Run the actual current and historical gates, independent copy and bilingual comparison. No philosophical source or version change is authorized by this implementation explanation. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean deleted file mode 100644 index d2976ce..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/audit.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -import RationaleReader -#check RationaleReader.original_comparison -#print axioms RationaleReader.original_comparison -#check RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -#print axioms RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -#check RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -#print axioms RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -#check RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -#print axioms RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -#check RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -#print axioms RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -#check RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -#print axioms RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -#check RationaleReader.encoded_statement -#print axioms RationaleReader.encoded_statement -#check RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -#print axioms RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -#check RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -#print axioms RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -#check RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -#print axioms RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json deleted file mode 100644 index f6e4bd8..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", - "baseline_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", - "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "raw_summary_sha256": "25c3e4c55898a2f4768b4069b7a4b872a8b38ffc41b69b689b249164ac737344", - "record_note": "Extract of an actual check; machine-specific evidence directory omitted. Kernel checking does not validate fidelity." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json deleted file mode 100644 index f6f4e2f..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2652 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "reported_reviews": [], - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "manuscript": { - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "current_source": "current", - "current_baseline": "current", - "errors": [], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - } - ], - "manifest_sha256": "bce2fcebdfa3adb21aa636f59fbe69d5de1aa2162c09ad861922df2b9d49a7f4" - }, - "kernel_passed": true, - "actual_summary_sha256": "b4c97914c3d09858893ed73432b15be209059e79bb2411e1a4b265f6e7233bf2", - "checker_sha256": { - "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "477e9bd0e87f4abb1748dba017952e1e03794900bbdb3dda3fbfa423990a6fb7", - "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" - }, - "record_note": "Actual final check with machine-specific evidence-directory field omitted; semantic judgments remain reported." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json deleted file mode 100644 index c742881..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/kernel.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,42 +0,0 @@ -{ - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "errors": [], - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "passed": true, - "run_sha256": "6d8a603d6088a0a9315bdd2d27269795db893c923d58c38edb0406c76a38b938", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "source_sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c" -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log deleted file mode 100644 index fafd12d..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lake-build.log +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ -✔ [2/3] Built RationaleReader (182ms) -Build completed successfully (3 jobs). -info: RationaleReader: no previous manifest, creating one from scratch -info: toolchain not updated; already up-to-date diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log deleted file mode 100644 index 7fd934a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/lean-audit.log +++ /dev/null @@ -1,32 +0,0 @@ -RationaleReader.original_comparison : - RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ - RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency -'RationaleReader.original_comparison' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample : - RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ - RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) ≠ - RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) -'RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted : - ¬∀ (n : Nat), RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial n) = n -'RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] -RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained : - RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) = - RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) -'RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct : - RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency ∧ - ¬RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.stricterLatency -'RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P -'RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.encoded_statement : 0 ≤ 1 -'RationaleReader.encoded_statement' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted : ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 -'RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] -RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim : 0 ≤ 1 ∧ ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 -'RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim' depends on axioms: [propext] -RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case : - RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] -'RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case' does not depend on any axioms diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json deleted file mode 100644 index a87c4a1..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/evidence/manuscript-check.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2658 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "reported_reviews": [], - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "manuscript": { - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "current_source": "current", - "current_baseline": "current", - "errors": [], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - } - ], - "manifest_sha256": "bab6d6e6981bca23633a05a1f2a054ea2fba545ea0a2dc9fa9a28747c3036c53" - }, - "kernel_passed": true, - "actual_summary_sha256": "9a23bb669877949ffa594e4a55a0c5041271b02eae5ac13a7c2ad069ad68b3dc", - "checker_sha256": { - "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "0e3e2ced77940ece0d2a6bebbb585afce0f0ce14d99cd880215ac7b560e976d1", - "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" - } -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean deleted file mode 100644 index 9cc82ed..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/RationaleReader.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,105 +0,0 @@ -namespace RationaleReader - -structure ServiceState where - acknowledged : Nat - cached : Nat - deriving DecidableEq - -def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged - -def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached - -def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } - -def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ - -structure LatencyContext where - directLatency : Nat - cacheLatency : Nat - budget : Nat - -def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ - -def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ - -def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := - c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison -rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 -rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ - -def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] - -def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] - -def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := - states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide - -end RationaleReader diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml deleted file mode 100644 index b7ceaf5..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lakefile.toml +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -name = "RationaleReader" -version = "0.0.1" -defaultTargets = ["RationaleReader"] -[[lean_lib]] -name = "RationaleReader" diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain deleted file mode 100644 index a8afa7d..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/leanified/lean-toolchain +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json deleted file mode 100644 index a44ed3a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/manuscript.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4166 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "repository_root": "../../..", - "source_current": { - "path": "../../../docs/rationale.md", - "sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c" - }, - "baseline_current": { - "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" - }, - "code_files": [ - { - "path": "leanified/RationaleReader.lean", - "sha256": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - } - ], - "review": { - "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", - "sha256": "9769e58e23dc722685c5a3cc19931532da6f9d1cf79b4af1b6045833bc3e728e" - }, - "views": { - "overview_en": { - "path": "../../rationale-overview.md", - "sha256": "a76d86074ce2ee6c64acf3ee55ed5ec29ab5cf39b4167a5ab829b793ac762048" - }, - "details_en": { - "path": "../../rationale-details.md", - "sha256": "de72db3e8ebb4175bffca222031ce50c000316acbfcca1fa5ded823576648e28" - }, - "overview_zh": { - "path": "../../../zh/lean/rationale-overview.md", - "sha256": "30b699a258a1311466c3f52b251e596380aa0e688630c20cd25b64b688f2b96a" - }, - "details_zh": { - "path": "../../../zh/lean/rationale-details.md", - "sha256": "98320f1ffd4b1c69d53347406cba2406b1ec463efdd94e5d1b463cf975559c06" - } - }, - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "unit": "rationale.L1", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "# Organon Rationale\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "unit": "rationale.L2", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L3", - "clause": "r-3-c1", - "excerpt": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L3", - "clause": "r-3-c2", - "excerpt": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "unit": "rationale.L4", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L5", - "clause": "r-5-c1", - "excerpt": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L5", - "clause": "r-5-c2", - "excerpt": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L5", - "clause": "r-5-c3", - "excerpt": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "unit": "rationale.L6", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "unit": "rationale.L7", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "unit": "rationale.L8", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "unit": "rationale.L9", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "unit": "rationale.L10", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c1", - "excerpt": "Generative Drive", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c2", - "excerpt": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c3", - "excerpt": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c4", - "excerpt": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L12", - "clause": "r-12-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L12", - "clause": "r-12-c2", - "excerpt": "Charter, unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L12", - "clause": "r-12-c3", - "excerpt": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c3", - "excerpt": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c4", - "excerpt": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c1", - "excerpt": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c2", - "excerpt": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c3", - "excerpt": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c4", - "excerpt": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c5", - "excerpt": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c3", - "excerpt": "The provision and its conditions remain.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c4", - "excerpt": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c1", - "excerpt": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c2", - "excerpt": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c3", - "excerpt": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c4", - "excerpt": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "unit": "rationale.L17", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "unit": "rationale.L18", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "unit": "rationale.L19", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "unit": "rationale.L20", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.1 Commitments and Objections\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "unit": "rationale.L21", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L22", - "clause": "r-22-c1", - "excerpt": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L22", - "clause": "r-22-c2", - "excerpt": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "unit": "rationale.L23", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "unit": "rationale.L24", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "unit": "rationale.L25", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c2", - "excerpt": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c3", - "excerpt": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c4", - "excerpt": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c5", - "excerpt": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c6", - "excerpt": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c2", - "excerpt": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c3", - "excerpt": "This supports examining their compatibility.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c4", - "excerpt": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c5", - "excerpt": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c6", - "excerpt": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c1", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c2", - "excerpt": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c3", - "excerpt": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c4", - "excerpt": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c5", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c2", - "excerpt": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c3", - "excerpt": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c4", - "excerpt": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c5", - "excerpt": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c6", - "excerpt": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c2", - "excerpt": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c3", - "excerpt": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c4", - "excerpt": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c5", - "excerpt": "They are not disallowed;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c6", - "excerpt": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c7", - "excerpt": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "unit": "rationale.L31", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L32", - "clause": "r-32-c1", - "excerpt": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L32", - "clause": "r-32-c2", - "excerpt": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L32", - "clause": "r-32-c3", - "excerpt": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "unit": "rationale.L33", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "unit": "rationale.L34", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "unit": "rationale.L35", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L36", - "clause": "r-36-c1", - "excerpt": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L36", - "clause": "r-36-c2", - "excerpt": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L36", - "clause": "r-36-c3", - "excerpt": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "unit": "rationale.L37", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c1", - "excerpt": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c2", - "excerpt": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c3", - "excerpt": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c4", - "excerpt": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c5", - "excerpt": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "unit": "rationale.L39", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c1", - "excerpt": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c2", - "excerpt": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c3", - "excerpt": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c4", - "excerpt": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c5", - "excerpt": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "unit": "rationale.L41", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "unit": "rationale.L42", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.3 Assessment Tools\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "unit": "rationale.L43", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c1", - "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c2", - "excerpt": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c3", - "excerpt": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c4", - "excerpt": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "unit": "rationale.L45", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "unit": "rationale.L46", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "unit": "rationale.L47", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c1", - "excerpt": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c2", - "excerpt": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c3", - "excerpt": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c4", - "excerpt": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c5", - "excerpt": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c6", - "excerpt": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c7", - "excerpt": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c8", - "excerpt": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "unit": "rationale.L49", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c1", - "excerpt": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c2", - "excerpt": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c3", - "excerpt": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c4", - "excerpt": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c5", - "excerpt": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "unit": "rationale.L51", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "unit": "rationale.L52", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 3. Removal Check\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "unit": "rationale.L53", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "unit": "rationale.L54", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "unit": "rationale.L55", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L56", - "clause": "r-56-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L56", - "clause": "r-56-c2", - "excerpt": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L56", - "clause": "r-56-c3", - "excerpt": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c2", - "excerpt": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c3", - "excerpt": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c4", - "excerpt": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L58", - "clause": "r-58-c1", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L58", - "clause": "r-58-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L58", - "clause": "r-58-c3", - "excerpt": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L59", - "clause": "r-59-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L59", - "clause": "r-59-c2", - "excerpt": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L60", - "clause": "r-60-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L60", - "clause": "r-60-c2", - "excerpt": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "unit": "rationale.L61", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L62", - "clause": "r-62-c1", - "excerpt": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L62", - "clause": "r-62-c2", - "excerpt": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L62", - "clause": "r-62-c3", - "excerpt": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "unit": "rationale.L63", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "unit": "rationale.L64", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 4. Illustrative Cases\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "unit": "rationale.L65", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L66", - "clause": "r-66-c1", - "excerpt": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L66", - "clause": "r-66-c2", - "excerpt": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L66", - "clause": "r-66-c3", - "excerpt": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "unit": "rationale.L67", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "unit": "rationale.L68", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Case | Judgment and limits |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "unit": "rationale.L69", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L70", - "clause": "r-70-c1", - "excerpt": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L70", - "clause": "r-70-c2", - "excerpt": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L70", - "clause": "r-70-c3", - "excerpt": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L71", - "clause": "r-71-c1", - "excerpt": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L71", - "clause": "r-71-c2", - "excerpt": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L71", - "clause": "r-71-c3", - "excerpt": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L72", - "clause": "r-72-c1", - "excerpt": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L72", - "clause": "r-72-c2", - "excerpt": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L73", - "clause": "r-73-c1", - "excerpt": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L73", - "clause": "r-73-c2", - "excerpt": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L73", - "clause": "r-73-c3", - "excerpt": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L74", - "clause": "r-74-c1", - "excerpt": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L74", - "clause": "r-74-c2", - "excerpt": "This violates internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L74", - "clause": "r-74-c3", - "excerpt": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L75", - "clause": "r-75-c1", - "excerpt": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L75", - "clause": "r-75-c2", - "excerpt": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L76", - "clause": "r-76-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L76", - "clause": "r-76-c2", - "excerpt": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L76", - "clause": "r-76-c3", - "excerpt": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c1", - "excerpt": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c2", - "excerpt": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c3", - "excerpt": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", - "countermodel": { - "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "verification": "passed", - "target": "refuted", - "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", - "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." - } - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c4", - "excerpt": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L78", - "clause": "r-78-c1", - "excerpt": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L78", - "clause": "r-78-c2", - "excerpt": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L78", - "clause": "r-78-c3", - "excerpt": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c1", - "excerpt": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c2", - "excerpt": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c3", - "excerpt": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c4", - "excerpt": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L80", - "clause": "r-80-c1", - "excerpt": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L80", - "clause": "r-80-c2", - "excerpt": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L80", - "clause": "r-80-c3", - "excerpt": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c1", - "excerpt": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c2", - "excerpt": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c3", - "excerpt": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c4", - "excerpt": "These capability definitions come from the application.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c1", - "excerpt": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c2", - "excerpt": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c3", - "excerpt": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c4", - "excerpt": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c1", - "excerpt": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c2", - "excerpt": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c3", - "excerpt": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c4", - "excerpt": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L84", - "clause": "r-84-c1", - "excerpt": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L84", - "clause": "r-84-c2", - "excerpt": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L85", - "clause": "r-85-c1", - "excerpt": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L85", - "clause": "r-85-c2", - "excerpt": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L85", - "clause": "r-85-c3", - "excerpt": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L86", - "clause": "r-86-c1", - "excerpt": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L86", - "clause": "r-86-c2", - "excerpt": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L86", - "clause": "r-86-c3", - "excerpt": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L87", - "clause": "r-87-c1", - "excerpt": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L87", - "clause": "r-87-c2", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L87", - "clause": "r-87-c3", - "excerpt": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L88", - "clause": "r-88-c1", - "excerpt": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L88", - "clause": "r-88-c2", - "excerpt": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L88", - "clause": "r-88-c3", - "excerpt": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c1", - "excerpt": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c2", - "excerpt": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c3", - "excerpt": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c4", - "excerpt": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L90", - "clause": "r-90-c1", - "excerpt": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L90", - "clause": "r-90-c2", - "excerpt": "Renaming alone adds no support.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L90", - "clause": "r-90-c3", - "excerpt": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "unit": "rationale.L91", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "unit": "rationale.L92", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "unit": "rationale.L93", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c1", - "excerpt": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c3", - "excerpt": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c4", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c5", - "excerpt": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "unit": "rationale.L95", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c1", - "excerpt": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c2", - "excerpt": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c3", - "excerpt": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c4", - "excerpt": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "unit": "rationale.L97", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L98", - "clause": "r-98-c1", - "excerpt": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L98", - "clause": "r-98-c2", - "excerpt": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L98", - "clause": "r-98-c3", - "excerpt": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "unit": "rationale.L99", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "unit": "rationale.L100", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "unit": "rationale.L101", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L102", - "clause": "r-102-c1", - "excerpt": "The following are hypothetical applications.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L102", - "clause": "r-102-c2", - "excerpt": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L102", - "clause": "r-102-c3", - "excerpt": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "unit": "rationale.L103", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "unit": "rationale.L104", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 6.1 Research Team\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "unit": "rationale.L105", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "unit": "rationale.L106", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "unit": "rationale.L107", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L108", - "clause": "r-108-c1", - "excerpt": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L108", - "clause": "r-108-c2", - "excerpt": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c1", - "excerpt": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c2", - "excerpt": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c3", - "excerpt": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c4", - "excerpt": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c5", - "excerpt": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c1", - "excerpt": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c2", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c3", - "excerpt": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c4", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c5", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c6", - "excerpt": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c1", - "excerpt": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c2", - "excerpt": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c3", - "excerpt": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c4", - "excerpt": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c5", - "excerpt": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c6", - "excerpt": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c1", - "excerpt": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c2", - "excerpt": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c3", - "excerpt": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c4", - "excerpt": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c5", - "excerpt": "the number of labels alone cannot.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c6", - "excerpt": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c7", - "excerpt": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c8", - "excerpt": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "unit": "rationale.L113", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "unit": "rationale.L114", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 6.2 Software System\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "unit": "rationale.L115", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "unit": "rationale.L116", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "unit": "rationale.L117", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L118", - "clause": "r-118-c1", - "excerpt": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L118", - "clause": "r-118-c2", - "excerpt": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c1", - "excerpt": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c2", - "excerpt": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c3", - "excerpt": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c4", - "excerpt": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c5", - "excerpt": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c6", - "excerpt": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c7", - "excerpt": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c1", - "excerpt": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c3", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c4", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c5", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c6", - "excerpt": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c1", - "excerpt": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c2", - "excerpt": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c3", - "excerpt": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", - "countermodel": { - "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "verification": "passed", - "target": "refuted", - "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", - "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." - } - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c4", - "excerpt": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c5", - "excerpt": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c1", - "excerpt": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c2", - "excerpt": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c3", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c4", - "excerpt": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c5", - "excerpt": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c6", - "excerpt": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "unit": "rationale.L123", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L124", - "clause": "r-124-c1", - "excerpt": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L124", - "clause": "r-124-c2", - "excerpt": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L124", - "clause": "r-124-c3", - "excerpt": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "unit": "rationale.L125", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "unit": "rationale.L126", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "unit": "rationale.L127", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L128", - "clause": "r-128-c1", - "excerpt": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L128", - "clause": "r-128-c2", - "excerpt": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "unit": "rationale.L129", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "unit": "rationale.L130", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "unit": "rationale.L131", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c1", - "excerpt": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c2", - "excerpt": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c3", - "excerpt": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c4", - "excerpt": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c5", - "excerpt": "Another project could select a different language.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-v2-c1", - "excerpt": "A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "Table-cell implementation label; no independent theorem is asserted." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-v2-c2", - "excerpt": "Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-v2-c3", - "excerpt": "Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-v2-c4", - "excerpt": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-v2-c5", - "excerpt": "Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-v2-c6", - "excerpt": "Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-v2-c7", - "excerpt": "The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c1", - "excerpt": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c2", - "excerpt": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c3", - "excerpt": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c4", - "excerpt": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c5", - "excerpt": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c1", - "excerpt": "`organon-core-principled-review`", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c2", - "excerpt": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c3", - "excerpt": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c4", - "excerpt": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c5", - "excerpt": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c6", - "excerpt": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c1", - "excerpt": "External `grill-me/grilling`", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c2", - "excerpt": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c3", - "excerpt": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c4", - "excerpt": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c5", - "excerpt": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c1", - "excerpt": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c2", - "excerpt": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c3", - "excerpt": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c4", - "excerpt": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c5", - "excerpt": "A consensus is not proof.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c6", - "excerpt": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c1", - "excerpt": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c2", - "excerpt": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c3", - "excerpt": "These are contextual method requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c4", - "excerpt": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c1", - "excerpt": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c2", - "excerpt": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c3", - "excerpt": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c4", - "excerpt": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c5", - "excerpt": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "unit": "rationale.L140", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c2", - "excerpt": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c3", - "excerpt": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c4", - "excerpt": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "unit": "rationale.L142", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c1", - "excerpt": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c2", - "excerpt": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c3", - "excerpt": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c4", - "excerpt": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - } - ] -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index b4878d8..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,900 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `ba7456d7a43ecc0a49398111904a9e5d75f421393ee4bc179da37850c80c9759`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Initial blind explanation of two Lean readers (English) - -Frozen initial artifact, prepared from code only with `organon-lean-natural-language --explain-lines`. Source fidelity is unevaluated. Mapping comments were treated solely as identifiers. - -## Input boundary and checked environment - -The translator received these two encodings, the task, the natural-language skill, and their lean-toolchain/lakefile.toml files. Automatic context also exposed repository AGENTS workflow instructions, project paths, a skills catalog, and parent status messages saying a later revision might be needed. It did not expose PHILOSOPHY text, rationale source text, source snapshots, run.json, source-first assessments, prior iteration records, or author correspondence explanations. Those were not retrieved. The AGENTS request to read philosophical source was intentionally not followed for this explicitly code-only task. A parent notice of later possible revision arrived after the semantic line explanations had been drafted; no changed input was read. - -Installed Lean reported: `Lean (version 4.33.1, arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0, commit 819816b2e0a3bf405af45ae5c7af2491d8f5bee6, Release)`. Both projects declare `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1`, one lean_lib apiece, and no package dependencies. The files contain no explicit imports, so Lean supplies its standard Init environment. For each file an exact source copy followed only by `#print axioms` for every declared top-level definition, type, structure, and theorem was checked with this version; both exited 0. Original code was not edited. Audit copies and logs are beside this document. This was actual elaboration/kernel checking plus an axiom audit, not a philosophical or source-fidelity check. - -Input SHA-256 values: - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b` - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6` - - - -## Shared semantic conventions - -All explicitly named parameters are universally quantified when a declaration is used generally. Unannotated binders have types inferred from use: aspect is Aspect, and context/n are Nat in these files. No declarations introduce user axioms, sorry, typeclass premises, extra imported theories, abstract support relations with hidden interpretations, or implicit philosophical assumptions. Core decidability instances support concrete equality, order, conjunction, negation, and membership computations. Generated instances are not premises supplied by a domain user. Constructors preceded by a dot use their expected inductive type. - -`Prop` is the type of propositions. `A → B` assumes a proof of A to produce B; `¬ A` means A → False. `∧` needs both proofs, `∨` needs one chosen branch, and `↔` needs implication both ways. `∀` quantifies over its full inferred domain; `∀ n ∈ xs, P n` abbreviates a universal implication from membership. Equality is Lean equality; a Boolean polarity is data, not itself truth or falsity of an external claim. Lists are finite ordered collections with possible repetitions. Field projections `.1`/`.2` extract conjunction components in the displayed proof terms. `rfl` proves definitional equality; `Iff.rfl` proves reflexive equivalence; `decide` computes a decidable proposition. `simp` unfolds the named definitions and applies available simplification lemmas. `intro` takes an arbitrary quantified input or an implication premise; `cases` eliminates constructors, including impossible equalities. No computational success validates an interpretation of the declared names. - -## Code-derived claims - -### CoreReader: Applicability and ignored labels - -Duties is an obligation predicate: for each of the three Aspect values, applicability to the selected natural-number claim implies examination at exactly the selected claim and grounds identifiers. Both supplied predicates are arbitrary. Assessed is just Duties with an unused list parameter. mixed_projection assumes Duties and applicability of empirical and value, then obtains the two examination facts by implication elimination; it does not establish the assumed obligation. labels_do_not_waive is reflexive equivalence of definitionally identical expressions. The definitions force label independence. Neither theorem shows that a supplied applicability or examination predicate faithfully represents an external assessment. No aspect applicable means Duties holds vacuously, and an always-true examination predicate makes it hold for any applicability predicate. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:3` (lines 3–24). - -```lean - -inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value - deriving DecidableEq - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect - -def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - Duties applicable examined claim grounds - -def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:29` (lines 29–31). - -```lean - -theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : - e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:36` (lines 36–38). - -```lean - -theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : - Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl - -``` - -### CoreReader: Three fixed predicate fixtures - -mixedClaim applies only to claim 7 and the empirical and value constructors. bothExamined holds only at claim 7 and grounds 3 for those same two constructors; empiricalOnly permits just empirical. complete_mixed_fixture constructs the required conjunctions at 7 and 3. empirical_only_rejected assumes Duties and obtains the impossible equality value = empirical. unrelated_grounds_rejected obtains 4 = 3 from the hard-coded grounds field. omitted_labels_still_rejected is exactly empirical_only_rejected after unfolding Assessed with an empty label list. These are constructive examples over chosen numeral identifiers. The numeral mismatch has no independently defined semantic relevance relation, and the code supplies no general procedure for finding applicable aspects or adequate grounds. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:43` (lines 43–45). - -```lean - -theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by - intro k hk - exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:50` (lines 50–53). - -```lean - -theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:58` (lines 58–61). - -```lean - -theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.1 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:66` (lines 66–67). - -```lean - -theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := - empirical_only_rejected - -``` - -### CoreReader: A finite token relation and same-context exclusion - -Fact is a five-token enumeration, with no formula syntax or valuation. In particular, pImpliesQ is not an implication and notQ is not negation. fixtureConsequence is a hand-written relation: at context 0, true requires membership of both p and pImpliesQ, while false requires notQ; context 1 has only the positiveInOne true branch; context 2 has only the negativeInTwo false branch. All other contexts fail. Consistent permits any supplied relation and means that true and false never both hold for one common context and the same token list. joint_conflict exhibits both at context 0 for the three-token list. withdrawn_current_set rules out all false branches of the shorter two-token list. distinct_contexts shows that the two singleton-style branches force an impossible common context 1 = 2. These theorems check this finite relation, not deductive closure of a general logic. Lists record no acquisition, withdrawal event, temporal history, or reasons for withdrawing a token. With an always-false consequence relation every held list is Consistent; with a relation true for both polarities at one context none is. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:69` (lines 69–82). - -```lean - -inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo - deriving DecidableEq - -def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := - (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ - (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ - (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ - (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent -organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 --/ -def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := - ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:87` (lines 87–89). - -```lean - -theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by - intro h - exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:94` (lines 94–96). - -```lean - -theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by - intro context h - simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:101` (lines 101–106). - -```lean - -theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by - intro context h - have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 - have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn - cases impossible - -``` - -### CoreReader: A Boolean condition on unequal lists - -ChangeReported before after claimsUnchanged means before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false. The concrete theorem rejects passing true for the two specified unequal lists by decidable computation. Lists, despite names containing set, are ordered and retain multiplicity: reordering or adding a duplicate can count as change here. Equal lists satisfy the implication vacuously even if the Boolean is true; a false Boolean always satisfies it. This is a Boolean admissibility condition and supplies no report contents, recipient, disclosure event, or evidence that anyone reports anything. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:111` (lines 111–112). - -```lean - -def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := - before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:117` (lines 117–120). - -```lean - -theorem changed_set_needs_report : - ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by - unfold ChangeReported - decide - -``` - -### CoreReader: A missing natural number alongside independently true and false claims - -ObservationComplete observed requires every natural number to belong to a finite list. observation_gap refutes completeness of [0, 1] using 2. The code proves this one list's gap; in standard finite-list semantics no finite list contains all natural numbers, but that general statement is not a theorem in this file. gap_with_true_conclusion pairs the gap with ∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n, proved by reduction and reflexivity. gap_with_false_conclusion pairs it with ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0), refuted at 1. These are conjunctions with independent arithmetic results. They show this fixed membership gap coexists with a true selected universal statement and the falsity of another selected universal statement. No support relation connects the list to either statement; no observation reliability, induction rule, or general theory of evidential support is defined. The quantifier is over all Nat, not all members of the observed list. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:125` (lines 125–125). - -```lean - -def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:130` (lines 130–133). - -```lean - -theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by - intro h - have h2 := h 2 - simp at h2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:138` (lines 138–140). - -```lean - -theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := - ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:145` (lines 145–150). - -```lean - -theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by - refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ - intro h - have bad := h 1 - cases bad - -``` - -### CoreReader: A singleton passes an equation which fails universally - -proposedPrinciple is n + 1 = 2 * n over Nat; selfAssessmentSamples is [1]. The theorem proves every list member satisfies the equation, by reducing membership to n = 1 and computing. It refutes universal satisfaction by evaluating the assumed equation at 0, where 1 = 0 would follow. All variables here are natural numbers; the bounded syntax ∀ n ∈ samples expands to ∀ n, n ∈ samples → equation n. This is a finite-sample arithmetic counterexample. No self-assessment process, evaluator, philosophy object, or correctness relation is modeled; the declaration names do not add one. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–154). - -```lean - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -def selfAssessmentSamples : List Nat := [1] - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:159` (lines 159–169). - -```lean - -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - (∀ n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples, proposedPrinciple n) ∧ ¬ (∀ n, proposedPrinciple n) := by - constructor - · intro n hn - simp [selfAssessmentSamples] at hn - subst n - unfold proposedPrinciple - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [proposedPrinciple] at bad - -``` - -### RationaleReader: Record projections, fixed updates, and separate latency data - -ServiceState is a pair of arbitrary natural numbers. direct and cachedRead are pure field projections. updateOnly replaces acknowledged and preserves cached; updateInvalidating ignores its old state and constructs (n, n). initial is (10, 10). LatencyContext is a separate triple; originalLatency is (5, 2, 6) and stricterLatency is (5, 2, 3), in direct/cache/budget order. withinBudget means both latency fields are at most budget. original_comparison computes agreement at initial and the inequalities 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6. There are no constraints relating a state's values or update functions to the latency records. These numbers are constants, with no units, measured workloads, I/O, concurrent execution, or latency distribution. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:3` (lines 3–28). - -```lean - -structure ServiceState where - acknowledged : Nat - cached : Nat - deriving DecidableEq - -def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged - -def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached - -def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } - -def updateInvalidating (_s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := ⟨n, n⟩ - -def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ - -structure LatencyContext where - directLatency : Nat - cacheLatency : Nat - budget : Nat - -def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ - -def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ - -def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := - c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:33` (lines 33–35). - -```lean - -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: A stale projection for one update and a false universal equality - -update_read_counterexample proves initial agreement at 10 and disagreement after updateOnly initial 11, whose fields are (11, 10). cached_freshness_refuted disproves ∀ n : Nat, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n by n = 11; the cached field remains 10. Thus the supplied universal equality fails in the explicitly constructed pure model. This is not a proof about all cache implementations, or a measured service failure. Neither theorem states a general implication from initial agreement to all subsequent agreement; the fixture instead supplies a concrete before/after contrast. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:41` (lines 41–43). - -```lean - -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:48` (lines 48–51). - -```lean - -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad - -``` - -### RationaleReader: Equal fields written directly; unchanged writes - -invalidation_restores_fixture computes that updateInvalidating initial 11 has both projections equal to 11, because the definition returns (11, 11). It models writing both values directly, not deletion of a cache entry or a protocol that later reloads one. unchanged_update_retained computes agreement after updateOnly initial 10, which preserves (10, 10). These theorems have no external premises and prove their particular numerical examples; neither claims a general temporal safety or invalidation theorem. The broader all-n equality for updateInvalidating follows from its definition, but is not the stated fixture theorem. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:56` (lines 56–57). - -```lean - -theorem invalidation_restores_fixture : - direct (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 ∧ cachedRead (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:62` (lines 62–63). - -```lean - -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: A budget-only change - -budget_change_is_distinct proves withinBudget (5, 2, 6) and not withinBudget (5, 2, 3). Both fixed latency numbers stay the same; the direct value 5 exceeds the smaller budget 3 although cache value 2 remains within it. The proof unfolds the predicate and computes. There is no causal claim that the service changed, no universal performance result, and no theorem connecting this budget condition to the separate cached-value disagreement. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:68` (lines 68–71). - -```lean - -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: An identity proof with a supplied proposition - -namedUniversalTruth explicitly quantifies over a proposition P and its assumed proof h : P, then returns exactly h. Its content is ∀ P : Prop, P → P. There are no hidden typeclass assumptions and no proof that an arbitrary proposition is true without h. In particular, the name does not create universal truth, philosophical correctness, or correspondence to any prose statement. This is the identity function on proofs. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:76` (lines 76–76). - -```lean - -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h - -``` - -### RationaleReader: One specific inequality and a different false generalization - -encoded_statement computes the single true inequality (0 : Nat) ≤ 1. different_statement_refuted refutes ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 at 2; case analysis of Nat's inductive ≤ proof reduces the impossible 2 ≤ 1 to an impossible 2 ≤ 0 case. proof_of_different_claim pairs the earlier results. It does not obtain the universal claim from the specific one. This proves a precise true/false contrast between two arithmetic statements, without a semantic encoding function or general theorem about the fidelity of formalization. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:81` (lines 81–81). - -```lean - -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:86` (lines 86–90). - -```lean - -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:95` (lines 95–97). - -```lean - -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ - -``` - -## Actual dependency audit - -The following checked declarations depend on Lean core `propext` (propositional extensionality, allowing equivalent propositions to be identified): `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected`, `CoreReader.joint_conflict`, `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set`, `CoreReader.distinct_contexts`, `CoreReader.observation_gap`, `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion`, `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion`, `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness`, `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted`, `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted`, and `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim`. Every other top-level declaration audited in the two files reported no axioms. The complete declaration-by-declaration output is in `CoreReader.audit.log` and `RationaleReader.audit.log`; these statements refer to the checked proof terms, including any dependency introduced by tactic-generated proofs. No claim is made that a listed axiom is required by every possible proof of the proposition. - -## Appendix: every nonblank source line - -Each numbered entry explains its actual line. Exact code is preserved in the excerpts above and the audit copies. Mapping comments supply metadata only. The machine-readable equivalent is `line-explanations.json`. - -### CoreReader.lean - -Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`; SHA-256 `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`. - -- L1: Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. - -- L3: Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. - -- L4: Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. - -- L6: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L7: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L8: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L9: Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - -- L10: Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. - -- L11: Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. - -- L13: Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. - -- L14: Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. - -- L15: Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. - -- L17: Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - -- L18: It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. - -- L20: Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - -- L21: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. - -- L23: Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - -- L24: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. - -- L26: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L27: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L28: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L29: Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. - -- L30: Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. - -- L31: Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. - -- L33: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L34: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L35: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L36: Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. - -- L37: Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. - -- L38: Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. - -- L40: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L41: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L42: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L43: State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. - -- L44: Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. - -- L45: Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. - -- L47: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L48: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L49: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L50: State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. - -- L51: Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. - -- L52: Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. - -- L53: Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. - -- L55: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L56: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L57: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L58: State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. - -- L59: Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. - -- L60: Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. - -- L61: Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. - -- L63: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L64: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L65: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L66: State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. - -- L67: Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. - -- L69: Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. - -- L70: Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. - -- L72: Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. - -- L73: The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. - -- L74: The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. - -- L75: A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. - -- L76: The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. - -- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L81: Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. - -- L82: Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. - -- L84: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L85: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L86: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L87: State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. - -- L88: Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. - -- L89: Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. - -- L91: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L92: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L93: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L94: State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. - -- L95: For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. - -- L96: Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. - -- L98: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L99: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L100: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L101: State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. - -- L102: Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. - -- L103: Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. - -- L104: Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. - -- L105: Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. - -- L106: Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. - -- L108: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L109: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L110: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L111: Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. - -- L112: Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. - -- L114: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L115: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L116: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L117: Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. - -- L118: State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. - -- L119: Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. - -- L120: Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. - -- L122: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L123: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L124: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L125: Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. - -- L127: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L128: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L129: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L130: State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. - -- L131: Assume completeness for contradiction. - -- L132: Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. - -- L133: Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. - -- L135: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L136: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L137: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L138: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. - -- L139: State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. - -- L140: Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. - -- L142: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L143: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L144: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L145: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. - -- L146: State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. - -- L147: Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. - -- L148: Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. - -- L149: Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. - -- L150: Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. - -- L152: Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. - -- L154: Define selfAssessmentSamples as the singleton natural-number list [1]. No assessment algorithm is encoded. - -- L156: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L157: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L158: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L159: Begin a theorem contrasting the fixed sample list with universal arithmetic validity. - -- L160: State that every member of [1] satisfies n + 1 = 2 * n, and that this equation does not hold for every natural number. The bounded quantifier expands to ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n. - -- L161: Split the conjunction into its sampled and universal-negation proof obligations. - -- L162: For the first obligation, introduce an arbitrary natural number n and its assumed sample-list membership hn. - -- L163: Unfold the singleton list and simplify membership, obtaining n = 1. - -- L164: Substitute 1 for n in the goal. - -- L165: Unfold proposedPrinciple to the arithmetic equation at 1. - -- L166: Prove the concrete equality 1 + 1 = 2 * 1 by decidable computation. - -- L167: For the second obligation, assume the equation holds at every natural number. - -- L168: Specialize the assumption to 0. - -- L169: Unfold and simplify the equation at 0, yielding the contradiction 1 = 0. - -- L171: Close the CoreReader namespace. - -### RationaleReader.lean - -Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`; SHA-256 `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`. - -- L1: Open the RationaleReader namespace. - -- L3: Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. - -- L4: Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. - -- L5: Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. - -- L6: Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. - -- L8: Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. - -- L10: Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. - -- L12: Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. - -- L14: Define updateInvalidating to ignore its old state entirely and return the pair (n, n). Despite its name, it directly writes both fields; it has no invalid marker, eviction, fetch, or invalidation protocol. - -- L16: Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. - -- L18: Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. - -- L19: Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. - -- L20: Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. - -- L21: Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. - -- L23: Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. - -- L25: Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. - -- L27: Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. - -- L28: Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. - -- L30: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L31: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L32: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L33: State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. - -- L34: Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. - -- L35: Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). - -- L37: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L38: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L39: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L40: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L41: Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. - -- L42: The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. - -- L43: The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. - -- L45: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L46: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L47: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L48: State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. - -- L49: Assume this universal equality for contradiction. - -- L50: Specialize it to 11. - -- L51: Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. - -- L53: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L54: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L55: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L56: Begin a concrete conjunction theorem about updateInvalidating initial 11. - -- L57: Prove by computation that both fields of the returned state are 11. This follows from construction of (11, 11), not a modeled cache invalidation process. - -- L59: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L60: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L61: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L62: Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. - -- L63: Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. - -- L65: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L66: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L67: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L68: Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. - -- L69: State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. - -- L70: Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. - -- L71: Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. - -- L73: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L74: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L75: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L76: For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. - -- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L81: Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. - -- L83: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L84: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L85: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L86: State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. - -- L87: Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. - -- L88: Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. - -- L89: Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. - -- L90: In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. - -- L92: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L93: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L94: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L95: Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. - -- L96: State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. - -- L97: Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. - -- L99: Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md deleted file mode 100644 index c2eceb2..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,477 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `2604d478b8cc776bd766a67a2edd4b27cd99f8b6c781d3f564fc751b0ae98425`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 两份 Lean 读者编码的初始盲解释（中文译稿） - -本稿翻译已经冻结的英文代码解释，没有读取来源原文或更新后的编码。英文初稿 initial.en.md 及其 SHA-256 保持不变；本稿不评估来源忠实性。 - -## 代码含义概览 - -CoreReader 的 Duties 是条件义务：对三个 Aspect 中的每个方面，若任意 supplied applicable 谓词判为适用，则同一主张及依据对应的 examined 关系必须成立。Assessed 完全忽略标签列表，因此标签不影响结果是定义直接决定的。具体示例用编号 7、3 及固定方面建立成立或不成立；编号 4 被拒绝来自 4 ≠ 3，不来自另外定义的相关性关系。 - -Fact 是五种标记，不含命题公式或逻辑赋值。fixtureConsequence 只有手写的三个语境分支；Consistent 排除同一语境中同一列表的两种布尔极性同时成立。具体定理证明该有限关系上的冲突、删除 notQ 后无负极性分支，以及不同语境不能成为同一语境；没有一般逻辑的演绎闭包或实际撤回过程。 - -ChangeReported 仅要求列表不等时布尔参数为 false，不含报告内容或行为。列表有序且允许重复；相同列表令蕴含空真。ObservationComplete 要求有限列表包含所有自然数；[0, 1] 在 2 处失败。其余两个定理将这项缺口分别与独立的算术真命题和假全称命题的否定组成合取，没有定义列表对结论的支持关系。 - -初始 selfAssessmentSamples 是 [1]，proposedPrinciple 是 n + 1 = 2 * n。证明在唯一样本 1 处成立，在 0 处失败；初始编码没有自评算法、评估者或哲学对象。 - -RationaleReader 的 ServiceState 只是两个自然数字段；direct 和 cachedRead 是纯投影，updateOnly 只写 acknowledged，初始 updateInvalidating 直接返回 (n, n)。这些是纯函数，没有 I/O、并发、失效标志或重新加载协议。具体例子证明 (10, 10) 初始一致，单字段改为 11 后成为 (11, 10)，两个字段直接写为 11 后一致，以及写回原值 10 后一致。 - -延迟记录独立于状态和更新函数。两个延迟恒为 5、2，预算从 6 改为 3 后，直接延迟不再达标；没有单位、测量或因果关系。namedUniversalTruth 对任意 P 和显式 h : P 直接返回 h，内容仅为 P → P。最后三个定理证明 0 ≤ 1，同时用 2 反驳所有自然数均 ≤ 1；没有语义编码函数或一般形式化忠实性定理。 - -## 检查及依赖 - -原始两个文件的逐字副本附加每个顶层声明的 #print axioms 后，均在 Lean 4.33.1 实际检查成功。部分证明依赖 Lean core 的 propext，其余已审计顶层声明无公理依赖。确切逐声明输出见同目录 CoreReader.audit.log、RationaleReader.audit.log；英文稿列出全部 propext 声明。检查仅证明这些形式命题的内核有效性，不证明哲学正确性或来源忠实性。 - -## 全部非空行解释 - -### CoreReader.lean - -路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`。 - -- L1：打开 CoreReader 命名空间；后续声明名带此前缀。 - -- L3：声明 Aspect 类型，恰有 empirical、inferential、value 三个互异的无参数构造子；名称本身没有定义领域含义。 - -- L4：生成 DecidableEq 实例，使任意两个 Aspect 值的相等性可计算判定。 - -- L6：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L7：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L8：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L9：开始定义命题 Duties，接收以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的任意适用性谓词 applicable。 - -- L10：再接收关于主张编号、依据编号和 Aspect 的任意三元谓词 examined，以及显式自然数参数 claim、grounds；未假设这些谓词具备任何性质。 - -- L11：Duties 表示：对每个 Aspect，若它适用于当前主张，则 examined 对同一主张、同一依据及该 Aspect 成立。没有任何适用方面时，此条件空真。 - -- L13：开始定义 Assessed，显式接收 Aspect 标签列表和任意适用性谓词；以下划线开头的标签参数未被使用。 - -- L14：接收 examined 谓词以及自然数主张、依据编号；返回命题。 - -- L15：将 Assessed 定义为这些谓词和编号对应的 Duties；标签既不限制也不加强该命题。 - -- L17：定义以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的 mixedClaim。 - -- L18：它恰在主张编号为 7 且方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；inferential 从不满足。 - -- L20：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 bothExamined。 - -- L21：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；合取向右嵌套。 - -- L23：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 empiricalOnly。 - -- L24：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 时成立；没有 value 或 inferential 分支。 - -- L26：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L27：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L28：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L29：开始一个对任意适用性谓词 a 和 examined 谓词 e 全称参数化的定理。 - -- L30：显式接收自然数 c、g，Duties a e c g 的假定证明 h，以及 empirical 和 value 适用于 c 的假定证明。 - -- L31：结论是在同一 c、g 上的两个 e 事实同时成立；分别把 h 用于 he、hv，再组成合取。下划线是推断出的 Aspect 实参；没有脱离这些前提建立任何 examination 事实。 - -- L33：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L34：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L35：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L36：开始一个关于任意两个标签列表 xs、ys 以及任意适用性谓词 a 的定理。 - -- L37：还量化 examined 谓词以及主张、依据编号。 - -- L38：用 Iff.rfl 证明两个 Assessed 命题等价：标签被忽略，两者都归约为同一 Duties 命题。这是定义恒等，不是关于标签的经验发现。 - -- L40：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L41：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L42：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L43：陈述具体谓词 mixedClaim、bothExamined 在主张 7、依据 3 处满足 Duties，并开始 tactic 证明。 - -- L44：引入任意方面 k 及 mixedClaim 7 k 的证明 hk。 - -- L45：构造 bothExamined 7 3 k：复用 hk 中的 7 = 7，用自反性证明 3 = 3，再复用 hk 中的方面析取。 - -- L47：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L48：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L49：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L50：陈述具体关系 empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处不满足 mixedClaim 的 Duties。 - -- L51：假设所否定的 Duties 命题，目标为推出 False。 - -- L52：把该假设用于 value；用 7 = 7 和右侧析取 value = value 建立适用性，得到 hv : empiricalOnly 7 3 value。 - -- L53：取出 hv 最内层的等式 value = empirical，利用两个 Aspect 构造子互异将其消去。 - -- L55：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L56：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L57：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L58：陈述在依据编号 4 而非 bothExamined 固定的 3 处，Duties 不成立。 - -- L59：为推出矛盾，假设主张 7、依据 4 处成立 Duties。 - -- L60：将其用于适用的 value 方面，得到 bothExamined 7 4 value。 - -- L61：消去得到的等式 4 = 3，即 hv.2.1。矛盾来自数值不等，而非单独定义的相关性概念。 - -- L63：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L64：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L65：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L66：陈述空标签列表无法使 mixedClaim、empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处的 Assessed 成立。 - -- L67：直接复用 empirical_only_rejected；展开 Assessed 后恰为此前定理否定的命题。 - -- L69：声明具有五个互异无参数构造子的 Fact 类型；pImpliesQ 是标记而非 Lean 蕴含，notQ 是标记而非逻辑否定。 - -- L70：生成 Fact 的可判定相等性，使具体列表成员关系可计算判定。 - -- L72：定义有限 Fact 标记列表、自然数语境和布尔极性之间的关系；列表不必无重复。 - -- L73：第一个语境 0 分支要求极性为 true 且 p、pImpliesQ 都属于列表，或者采用下一行的备选条件。 - -- L74：语境 0 的另一条件要求极性为 false 且 notQ 属于列表；此处结束语境 0 分支。 - -- L75：独立分支要求语境为 1、极性为 true 且 positiveInOne 属于列表。 - -- L76：最后一个分支要求语境为 2、极性为 false 且 negativeInTwo 属于列表；没有其他分支或推理规则。 - -- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L81：以所示类型的任意 consequence 关系及有限 Fact 标记列表定义 Consistent。 - -- L82：要求每个自然数语境中，同一列表的 true 和 false 两种极性不能同时满足该关系；未限制所传关系必须对应逻辑蕴涵。 - -- L84：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L85：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L86：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L87：陈述列表 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 在具体 fixtureConsequence 下不满足 Consistent。 - -- L88：为推出矛盾，假设该列表满足一致性条件。 - -- L89：将一致性条件用于语境 0，提供两种极性的证明；它们分别通过简化显式关系和具体列表成员关系得到。 - -- L91：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L92：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L93：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L94：陈述较短列表 [p, pImpliesQ] 在 fixtureConsequence 下满足一致性条件。 - -- L95：对任意语境，假设两种极性同时成立，目标为 False。 - -- L96：简化 false 极性的假设 h.2；列表中既没有 notQ 也没有 negativeInTwo，因此所有 false 分支都不可能。 - -- L98：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L99：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L100：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L101：陈述 [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] 在示例关系下满足一致性条件。 - -- L102：引入同一个语境，并假设两种极性都在其中成立。 - -- L103：简化 true 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 1。 - -- L104：简化 false 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 2。 - -- L105：把第一个等式反向后与第二个复合，得到不可能的自然数等式 1 = 2。 - -- L106：消去不可能的等式，完成矛盾证明。 - -- L108：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L109：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L110：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L111：以两个列表和名为 claimsUnchanged 的布尔值定义 ChangeReported；这些都是显式输入，没有时间、说话者或报告对象。 - -- L112：要求列表不等蕴含 claimsUnchanged = false；列表相等时条件空真。列表相等区分顺序和重复次数；false 不提供任何报告内容。 - -- L114：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L115：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L116：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L117：开始如下关于 ChangeReported 的具体否定定理。 - -- L118：陈述从 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 改为 [p, pImpliesQ] 且传入 true 时不满足 ChangeReported。 - -- L119：将 ChangeReported 展开为从列表不等到布尔等式的蕴含。 - -- L120：计算判定这个具体命题：列表不同，但 true 不等于 false。 - -- L122：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L123：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L124：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L125：定义 ObservationComplete observed 为每个自然数都属于有限列表 observed；未标注类型的 n 由成员关系推断为 Nat。没有建模观察过程。 - -- L127：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L128：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L129：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L130：陈述列表 [0, 1] 不包含全部自然数。 - -- L131：为推出矛盾，假设其完备。 - -- L132：把全称成员假设用于 2，得到 2 ∈ [0, 1]。 - -- L133：将这个不可能的具体成员关系简化为 False。 - -- L135：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L136：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L137：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L138：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个算术真命题。 - -- L139：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不满足 ObservationComplete，以及每个自然数满足 n + 0 = n。 - -- L140：用 observation_gap 和对每个自然数给出自反性证明的函数构造合取；Nat 加法把 n + 0 归约为 n。算术证明独立于列表。 - -- L142：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L143：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L144：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L145：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个错误全称等式。 - -- L146：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不完备，以及“每个自然数都等于 0”为假。 - -- L147：把 observation_gap 用作第一个合取项，留下被否定全称命题的证明目标。 - -- L148：假设所有自然数都等于 0，目标为 False。 - -- L149：将假设用于 1，得到 1 = 0。 - -- L150：消去不可能的数值等式。 - -- L152：将 proposedPrinciple n 定义为自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n；名称没有赋予其哲学或规范地位。 - -- L154：将 selfAssessmentSamples 定义为单元素自然数列表 [1]；没有编码评估算法。 - -- L156：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L157：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L158：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L159：开始一个比较固定样本列表与算术全称有效性的定理。 - -- L160：陈述 [1] 中每个元素满足 n + 1 = 2 * n，而非每个自然数都满足它。受限量词展开为 ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n。 - -- L161：将合取拆为样本成立和否定全称成立两个证明目标。 - -- L162：对第一个目标，引入任意自然数 n 及其属于样本列表的假设 hn。 - -- L163：展开单元素列表并简化成员关系，得到 n = 1。 - -- L164：在目标中用 1 替换 n。 - -- L165：展开 proposedPrinciple，得到 1 处的算术等式。 - -- L166：通过可判定计算证明具体等式 1 + 1 = 2 * 1。 - -- L167：对第二个目标，假设该等式在每个自然数处都成立。 - -- L168：将假设用于 0。 - -- L169：展开并简化 0 处的等式，得到矛盾 1 = 0。 - -- L171：关闭 CoreReader 命名空间。 - -### RationaleReader.lean - -路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`。 - -- L1：打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 - -- L3：声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 - -- L4：声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 - -- L5：声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 - -- L6：通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 - -- L8：将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - -- L10：将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - -- L12：将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 - -- L14：将 updateInvalidating 定义为完全忽略旧状态并返回 (n, n)；尽管名称如此，它直接写入两个字段，没有无效标志、逐出、读取或失效协议。 - -- L16：将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 - -- L18：声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 - -- L19：声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 - -- L20：声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 - -- L21：声明 budget，取任意自然数。 - -- L23：将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 - -- L25：将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 - -- L27：开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 - -- L28：使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 - -- L30：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L31：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L32：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L33：陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 - -- L34：将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 - -- L35：通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 - -- L37：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L38：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L39：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L40：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L41：开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 - -- L42：第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 - -- L43：第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 - -- L45：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L46：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L47：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L48：陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 - -- L49：为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 - -- L50：将其用于 11。 - -- L51：展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 - -- L53：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L54：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L55：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L56：开始一个关于 updateInvalidating initial 11 的具体合取定理。 - -- L57：通过计算证明返回状态的两个字段均为 11；这来自构造 (11, 11)，而非已建模的缓存失效过程。 - -- L59：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L60：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L61：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L62：开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 - -- L63：计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 - -- L65：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L66：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L67：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L68：开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 - -- L69：陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 - -- L70：将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 - -- L71：计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 - -- L73：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L74：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L75：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L76：对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 - -- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L81：通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 - -- L83：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L84：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L85：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L86：陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 - -- L87：为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 - -- L88：将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 - -- L89：利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 - -- L90：在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 - -- L92：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L93：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L94：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L95：开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 - -- L96：同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 - -- L97：复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 - -- L99：关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index dcc68e1..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,95 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `bd4eb98a1b1369a610195329d9f33f2162c693aa31def3b28ec03d37874a0e17`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Informed code update: Round 2 (English) - -## Status and input boundary - -This is an informed incremental code explanation, not a fresh blind assessment. The original English explanation and line JSON were frozen before this update, and the original Chinese explanation and line JSON were completed without reading revised code. The initiating agent then disclosed the changed declaration locations and requested this update. That message mentioned a new stored-principle/sample computation and revised state-list comparison; it supplied no source prose or source correspondence judgment. The translator has now inspected the revised encoding, while still not reading PHILOSOPHY, rationale source prose, source snapshots, run.json, source-first judgments, author mapping interpretations, or prior records. Original blind artifacts remain unchanged. Source fidelity remains unevaluated. - -Current input hashes: - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803` - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7` - -## CoreReader: an actual finite Boolean assessment - -At lines 154–162, SelfAssessingSystem stores ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool and samples : List Nat. runOwnAssessment applies List.all to the samples with the function from that same record. This gives an explicit identity link: the function assessed on the finite samples is the very field later quantified over in the theorem. List.all evaluates to true on [] and evaluates p head && all tail p on a nonempty list. It therefore checks all listed inputs, without checking any unlisted input. The fields impose no sample-selection, nonemptiness, coverage, or correctness invariant. The word own is a field name; the code establishes that the function is stored in this record, but has no provenance or ownership relation. - -sampleSystem stores the Boolean function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n and the sample list [1]. The old proposedPrinciple definition at line 152 remains, but the function literally repeats its arithmetic expression rather than referring to that definition. The sample function is computational, using the inferred Decidable instance for natural-number equality. This library instance supplies an equality decision procedure, not an extra domain premise supplied by a caller. - -At lines 167–174, self_assessment_not_correctness proves runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true and ¬ (∀ n : Nat, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true). The first part unfolds the actual computation and decides the equation at 1. The second assumes true at every input, instantiates at 0, and simplifies the false arithmetic equation to the impossible Boolean equality false = true. Thus this one system passes its actual finite sample check while its own stored function fails at an untested input. This now includes an assessment computation that the initial encoding lacked. It remains a numerical example of finite testing; it does not encode assessment of an evaluator, recursive philosophical self-application, correctness of a philosophy, or fulfillment of an external responsibility. Passing the supplied finite test does not become a premise proving all-input validity. - -Exact revised encoding: - -`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–174) - -```lean - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -structure SelfAssessingSystem where - ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool - samples : List Nat - -def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := - s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple - -def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := - ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness -organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc --/ -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by - constructor - · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [sampleSystem] at bad - -``` - -## RationaleReader: retaining one input while adding a revealing input - -The initial updateInvalidating definition and invalidation_restores_fixture theorem have been removed. Their old explanation describes only the frozen initial input; no current theorem models direct writes to both fields as a repair. - -At lines 91–96, originalStates is [initial] and revisedStates is [initial, updateOnly initial 11]. These are explicit lists of pure records: initial has (acknowledged, cached) = (10, 10), and the additional record has (11, 10). The original record is retained as the identical first list element. compareReads maps each input to the pair (direct state, cachedRead state); List.map preserves order and length. Despite its name, the function collects observations into pairs and does not itself test the two values for equality or produce an equivalence verdict. - -At lines 101–103, revised_method_retains_case proves the exact output lists [(10, 10)] and [(10, 10), (11, 10)] by decidable computation. This demonstrates for these two fixed input lists that expanding the selected cases retains the earlier equal pair and adds a differing pair. It does not repair the state transformation, establish cache freshness, prove a universal theorem about all method revisions, or model all possible update/read interleavings. The output lists provide concrete observable artifacts; they are not execution histories with timing or independent support for the chosen domain interpretation. - -Exact revised encoding: - -`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:91` (lines 91–103) - -```lean - -def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] - -def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] - -def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := - states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide - -``` - -## Retained claims and limits - -Unchanged declarations retain the code-derived meanings in the initial manuscript. In particular, Assessed still ignores labels; Duties still depends on arbitrary predicates; the token consequence relation is still finite and explicitly stipulated; ChangeReported is still only a Boolean condition on list inequality; the observation-gap conjunctions still have no evidence-support relation; and namedUniversalTruth still returns the supplied proof h unchanged. The new assessment computation and new state-list output theorem do not alter those independent limitations. Line numbers in the initial manuscript belong to the frozen initial inputs; use line-explanations-current.json for current locations. - -## Actual checks and dependencies - -Both revised files were copied verbatim into *.current.audit.lean with only #print axioms commands appended for every top-level declared definition, type, structure, and theorem, then elaborated and kernel-checked with installed Lean 4.33.1. Both commands exited 0. The declaration-by-declaration logs are CoreReader.current.audit.log and RationaleReader.current.audit.log. The same retained set of theorem names reported propext as in the initial audit; self_assessment_not_correctness still uses propext. The added SelfAssessingSystem, runOwnAssessment, sampleSystem, originalStates, revisedStates, compareReads, and revised_method_retains_case reported no axioms. No user axiom or sorry was introduced. The checked List.all body and Decidable.decide definition are recorded in core-library-inspection.log. Decidable.decide returns false for an isFalse decision and true for an isTrue decision; its Decidable argument is a core-inferred typeclass instance here. - -The full current nonblank-line explanation is line-explanations-current.json, with both en and zh for every line, including comments, fields, definitions, proof steps, and namespace delimiters. Unchanged entries were reused only through exact aligned code lines, while the changed Core block and all newly added Rationale lines were explained afresh. This is an explanation and formal dependency check, not independent validation of source meaning or philosophical correctness. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json deleted file mode 100644 index 82388be..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2630 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", - "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "initial_records": [ - { - "role": "source_initial", - "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", - "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" - }, - { - "role": "code_blind", - "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", - "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" - }, - { - "role": "code_informed_update", - "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", - "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison", - "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", - "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" - } - ], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", - "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", - "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", - "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", - "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", - "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", - "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", - "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - } - ], - "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json deleted file mode 100644 index 6aba6b2..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/fidelity.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2640 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "run_sha256": "6d8a603d6088a0a9315bdd2d27269795db893c923d58c38edb0406c76a38b938", - "source_sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "initial_records": [ - { - "role": "source_initial", - "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", - "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" - }, - { - "role": "code_blind", - "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", - "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" - }, - { - "role": "code_informed_update", - "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", - "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison", - "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", - "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" - }, - { - "role": "source_initial_migration", - "path": "reviews/migration-source-initial.md", - "sha256": "6c16785adf65077a7187a18094704874c9ae09721e01a8d7d88c7d96e7eb0a11" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison_migration", - "path": "reviews/migration-source-comparison.md", - "sha256": "3691f6e7a6479436b62c927abc3b7ccb4491c1f7aa59bfc25880b52c867f75aa" - } - ], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", - "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", - "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", - "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", - "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", - "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", - "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", - "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "Table-cell implementation label; no independent theorem is asserted.", - "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", - "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", - "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", - "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", - "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", - "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No Lean encoding or theorem is supplied for this implementation-design clause. It is reviewed as explanatory rationale, not as a proved philosophical obligation.", - "review_stage": "unmodeled_revised_implementation_rationale" - } - ], - "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials. Migration edition: original source and code reviews are reused only for unchanged objects/clauses. Line133 was revised; its new clauses have no theorem mappings. A separate independent migration comparison reviews wording and retained limits, not a new source proof." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md deleted file mode 100644 index b1d6d7e..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-comparison.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,27 +0,0 @@ -# Migration review export - -Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `6c2528756e18a36dfb24a5aafd8b6b499f60f41adc26c2ad78fc43dd310e7b81`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. - -# Independent candidate comparison - -Compared after preserved source-initial.md; initial source bytes matched frozen baseline. New candidate read includes Core/outer skills, philosophy-resolution, AGENTS, iteration, structure, rationale row 133 and its Chinese counterpart. The only live-source uncertainty from initial reading (new zh/AGENTS appendix) was excluded from the initial source judgment. - -## Judgment - -The revised row describes the authorized implementation change without revising philosophy 0.1.3. It keeps English text as the commitments and separates tool success from source fidelity, sufficient grounds and philosophical correctness. Ordinary assessments retain no Lean prerequisite. Revisability under this repository's objectives/constraints preserves the prior distinction between contextual design choice and philosophical obligation. The row does not state that text/tool presence proves clarity, capability or correctness. It therefore addresses the original script-free rationale rather than silently leaving an obsolete reason. - -The Chinese row preserves the same force and limits. “可复跑的形式化支持” is a contextual translation of reproducible formalization support; it does not claim every semantic judgment can be reproduced mechanically. “工具通过不确立…” retains non-sufficiency, and “前置要求” retains ordinary-assessment scope. No supported wording or translation defect identified in this row. No philosophical absorption or version change follows merely from the migration. - -New Core method owns proof/translation and Core parser support; outer methods preserve inputs and route rather than duplicate. Explicit selection and real source directory survive delegation, failed explicit/workspace lookup cannot trigger Core fallback, and standalone code explanation requires no philosophy. Maintenance rules bind changes to real dependencies and distinguish historical replay from current approval. They expressly require accurate incomplete/failed/limited/unmodeled states, not every proof passing. These provisions fit the initial responsibility boundaries. - -One concrete documentation issue: new Core run-format.md initially told users to run `node skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js` from the outer repository. The command is relative to Core root and fails as written from outer. Requested minimal correction to “from the Core repository.” No change to the implementation needed for this finding. - -## New rationale clauses and evidence reuse - -Seven row components are separately inventoried. The row label is structural/not applicable to proof; its six explanatory claims remain incomplete/unmodeled where no Lean declaration supports them. Their source-first review establishes that the prose can serve as authorized non-normative rationale, not that Lean has proved it. Unchanged prior definitions, theorem statements, attached old mapping hashes and code-derived explanations may be reused only if exact objects remain unchanged and the reuse is disclosed. New rationale source requires a new run/comparison object; old source snapshots and judgments remain intact. Final corpus verification is still pending; this comparison does not pre-approve future manifests or translations. - -## Actual use and limits - -See independent-skill-cases/skill-responses.md and per-command JSON. Core/outer mechanical builds and declaration audits both exit 0 with semantic_status not_evaluated after preserving an initial no-declaration rejection. Lean-only identity builds, returns its explicit premise and has no axiom dependencies. Explicit downstream baseline 0.7.2 is retained; missing explicit path fails with no Core fallback. Results support these bounded behavior checks, not whole-text fidelity or proof completeness. - -Self-check across six dimensions: consistency and responsibility allocation are preserved; required source and baseline distinctions are covered in the observed variations; runtime behavior has actual evidence for the named paths; failure cases remain visible and can rebut wider claims; no autonomous capability is inferred from added tools; thin forwarding reduces method duplication while retaining contextual review costs. No new material philosophical choice arose. Further review is justified only for the final new evidence/manuscript objects and the reported command-location correction. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index b13bca7..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/migration-source-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,40 +0,0 @@ -# Migration review export - -Actual independent review; initial source assessment precedes candidate disclosure, and comparison is informed. Path-only redaction; original SHA256: `47a9f88895b7fa1f4366d2ba3ca8e0bf4a75ee82697745cb5673f4c3056a8376`. Historical exposure is disclosed in the record. - -# Independent source-first assessment - -Recorded 2026-09-13 before reading the author candidate, new Lean code, author reports, or reader verdicts. Reviewer received the raw objective and existing Core philosophy/rationale/methods plus the two current outer Lean skills. The live Chinese AGENTS read already contains a Lean-reader section; it is excluded from this initial source judgment because its timing is uncertain. - -## Fixed source and objective - -Core `PHILOSOPHY.md` declares philosophy/core 0.1.3, format 0.1.0. The English text, including meanings and limits, is the assessment authority. Move Lean implementation and tools into Core, retain outer entrypoints, synchronize actual dependencies and corresponding Chinese text, and report accurate individual statuses without a quota requiring all proofs to pass. This is authorized implementation maintenance, not adoption of a changed philosophy. - -## Original-source judgment and row 133 - -Rationale row 133 currently chooses “A text-centered core and script-free skills.” Its contextual reason is a thin, inspectable text layer without an execution framework; its limit explicitly says that script absence is a design choice and other applications may reasonably use tools. This is non-normative explanatory rationale, not a timeless philosophical prohibition. Core AGENTS currently says delivered core/skills remain text-only. The new explicit objective replaces that implementation constraint within this scope. Merely deleting row 133 would lose the reason/limit distinction: revise it to explain inspectable English commitments plus optional, revisable Lean implementations/tools, justified by source correspondence and reproducible bounded evidence. Preserve that text/tools do not establish clarity, capability, philosophical truth, or universal necessity. Do not describe Lean as part of the philosophical authority or require ordinary assessments to formalize their inputs. - -## Responsibility and dependency boundaries - -- Philosophy 2.1 requires appropriate support for empirical, inferential and value aspects; mechanical checking supplies conditional inferential evidence and cannot certify empirical adequacy or adopted values. -- Philosophy 1.3 forbids concealing changed judgments/conditions; frozen historical results and current stale status must coexist accurately. -- Philosophy 1.4 preserves self-application conditions and rejects self-proof; independent review is the repository method, not a philosophical theorem. -- Philosophy 2.4 requires reasons for the migration and retains alternatives. Central ownership can reduce duplicated implementation while keeping public wrappers; names and Core placement supply no extra authority. -- Existing assess owns compatibility; absorb owns adoption; principled-review returns six-dimension findings; wording review owns language quality only. Lean proof owns inventory, encoding, dependency audit and conditional mechanical result; natural-language skill explains code and compares correspondence without silently upgrading it. -- Current outer proof skill uses outer resolver, parser/checker and references. Relocation must inspect their real imports and data paths, preserve explicit selected baselines, reject invalid explicit paths without fallback, and retain standalone syntax explanation without requiring a philosophical baseline. -- A successful build/audit is not source fidelity. Missing independent review remains incomplete/provisional. Accepted fragments stay limited; rejected correspondence can fail despite a successful build; unsupported/unfinished does not mean false. Verified countermodels can support non-entailment and must not mark the refuted implication as passed. -- Synchronize source/baseline/code/review/manuscript bindings when those dependencies change. Preserve historical evidence and never overwrite hashes to make old evidence current. Structural or wording-only unrelated changes must not require pretending all prior formal claims changed. - -## Six-dimension initial assessment - -Consistency: migration is compatible if the old script-free policy is explicitly updated and authority/status distinctions survive. Minimal completeness: preserve both entrypoints, reference assets, ordinary-text partitioning, explicit-baseline failure behavior and whole-claim/unmodeled coverage; do not use a path-only check as evidence of runtime usability. External adequacy: executable paths, installed toolchain and portable packages need actual checks; currently unknown. Rebuttal: a code-only explanation wrongly resolving philosophy, a changed source shown current, or a rejected mapping shown passed refutes the corresponding implementation claim. Self-transcendence: implementation revisability supports the authorized change but does not prove improvement; the static Lean artifact need not have autonomous orientation. Occam: one Core implementation with narrow outer delegation is preferable if functionality and boundaries are preserved; mechanical duplication merely renamed is not established simplification. - -## Independent small cases, registered before candidate - -Case A — ordinary source: “A workshop values preserving an existing craft. This commitment does not require every implementation to use its oldest tool.” Apply proof workflow to this two-sentence ordinary-text object. Preserve both clauses with nonoverlapping local IDs; distinguish commitment from limit/non-entailment; no metadata injection and no automatic adoption of the source. Any completed proof is conditional on an explicitly explained encoding. Missing review means incomplete rather than passed. - -Case B — Lean-only snippet: `theorem retained (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h`. Apply natural-language entrypoint in both Core and outer with no source prose or adopted baseline. Explain that P is already an explicit premise, conclusion supplied by h, and no independent support or source fidelity is established. A code-only explanation is possible even if no philosophy resolves; mark kernel result unverified unless actual checking runs. - -Case C — baseline variation: repeat A with an explicit downstream baseline file, then an explicit nonexistent baseline path. Retain the valid selected baseline and its directory/version; invalid explicit selection must stop the dependent compatibility stage without silently using bundled Core, while source inventory can continue. A later changed maintained baseline makes a current reader judgment stale, not its frozen theorem false. - -Self-check: these are method/implementation acceptance boundaries, not extra philosophical commitments. Source-only initial assessment cannot certify candidate runtime behavior, translation or semantic fidelity. No candidate verdict is issued yet. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md deleted file mode 100644 index fab352a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-current.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `cb99ad55a0e4dad0f45f74ef91d279313333a2571a48e0d3856670ad2734272b`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 第二轮：两个修订对应的独立复评 - -日期：2026-09-13。仅复评c-83-c2和r-121-c4；旧初评、第一轮比较及其四项拒绝判断全部保留，不改写历史。本轮两个新版本均判断partial，详见mapped-judgments-round2.json中的逐条双语理由。c-89-c2和c-94-c3没有修正相关语义，继续rejected。 - -## 新证据与判断变化 - -c-83-c2：SelfAssessingSystem现在实际持有ownPrinciple和samples，runOwnAssessment确实计算同一所属谓词在自身样本上的结果。sampleSystem的[1]通过而0反驳其普遍正确，原先“只有名称、没有对象所属关系与实际考察”的缺口已在这个狭窄解释中补足。因此由rejected改为partial。仍没有形成/修订、适用条件、对评估规则本身的评估或全部反身性；不能从这个实例宣称任何自评都失败或自评永远不能支持正确结论。 - -r-121-c4：删除updateInvalidating实现修复示例，新增originalStates/revisedStates和实际compareReads。direct与cachedRead不变，修订的是比较状态集合，结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)，与本句的评估范围修订有直接有限对应。因此由rejected改为partial。它只是一个静态案例与一个变化案例，未建模一般测试运行器、任意序列、并发或所有回归案例。 - -## 自选实际边界变体 - -所有源码快照、探针、完整重跑命令、首次失败和实际输出保存在reader-round2-probes/。不是仅列计划或手动推断。 - -1. Core：把samples改为空列表，runOwnAssessment返回true，但所属谓词仍在0处为假；把samples改为[1,0]返回false；另建恒真所属谓词，测试返回true且能证明全部输入正确。四个实际输出为(true,true,false,true)，顺序为空样本、原实例、含反例样本、恒真原则。通过可以空泛，也可以与错误或正确并存，是否有实质支持仍需要解释采样和主张范围。 -2. Rationale：compareReads在空状态列表输出[]，仅initial输出[(10,10)]，加入updateOnly initial 10仍只有相同对，真实revisedStates输出[(10,10),(11,10)]。另实际证明initial属于revisedStates。评估修订的可见贡献依赖加入相关变化，不由列表更长或“revised”名称保证。 - -这些边界不要求扩大公布模型。它们要求公布措辞保留“选定非空实例”“加入11这一相关变化”“有限反例/有限比较”，不把样本通过说成完整自评能力，也不把任意新增案例说成改进。 - -## 实际运行与限制 - -首次尝试在两个工程执行lake env lean并导入模块，均因工程搜索路径无对应olean返回1；Lake同时自动创建了此前不存在的lake-manifest.json。未假装首次运行通过。随后将所读完整源码快照与探针体拼接成两个独立Lean文件，使用固定Lean4.33.1二进制检查，均返回0并输出上述结果。这同时检查了源声明与新探针，无需依赖一个未知的新旧构建产物。实际结果含恢复过程和快照hash。 - -本轮未修改维护源码、run.json、原初评或第一轮判断。除Lake自动生成manifest外，新增文件仅在忽略的P下。无需重复已通过探针；后续若文稿宣称超出上述范围，应作为新的具体措辞/对应问题审查。没有full判断或哲学正确性认证。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index 19ae64a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `37695a48276f635e264f19ccc07bef559600946518835eef37029ab18c7b3a1d`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 原文初评与已披露编码比较 - -日期：2026-09-13。比较者：reader_source_initial。本轮是在source-initial.md和source-inventory.json冻结后进行的知情比较；不修改两份初评文件。基线仍为Core 0.1.3英文正本及当前rationale。已读取两个run.json、两个完整Lean源文件、encoding-preregistration.md，以及两份entry-data的全部映射条目。输入hash单独保存在comparison-input-hashes.json。 - -## 判断 - -16个已映射源子句中，12项支持有限对应（partial），4项拒绝当前对应（rejected）。另记录15项实质未编码内容为pending，108项结构或表格角色/名称为not_applicable。无full判断。mapped-judgments.json提供逐项英文及中文理由，id使用clause_id；clause=null则使用entry_id。未列出的实质主张应由汇总者明确标为pending并说明没有编码，不能因为条目缺席视为通过。 - -构建与依赖审计通过是调用者披露的机械结果；本轮未重复构建。所有保真判断来自实际定义、完整定理陈述与源文对应，不来自build状态。没有把未建模判为哲学缺陷。 - -## 四项当前对应应撤回或修订 - -1. c-89-c2：ObservationComplete只表示列表覆盖全部自然数，不含观测结果、主张、根据和支持关系。因此observation_gap及真假结论并列定理均不能表示“根据支持与主张强度/范围相称”。尤其真结论n+0=n已有独立证明，不能因列表未覆盖全部自然数称它支持不足；反过来只有输入覆盖也不保证观测内容为真或相关。预注册的“coverage sufficiency criterion”并未以证据与结论的关系实现，而且若被视为一般充分支持会改变原义。最小修正是撤回这四项对c-89-c2的映射，保留未映射的算术/覆盖示例；若要重新映射，需要明确的仅凭观测记录的蕴涵模型及额外假设，不能以名称补足。 -2. c-94-c3：unrelated_grounds_rejected仅因bothExamined要求grounds=3而拒绝4，证明的是记录编号不匹配。它没有实现“考察那些根据是否支持相应主张”。允许examined作为外部关系的条件化接口，不等于具体编号等式已经有考察语义。应撤回对这句实质考察责任的映射，保留编号完整性探针。c-94-c5/c6可保留为条件化责任分配和分类标签无免责效力的有限接口。 -3. c-83-c2：self_assessment_not_correctness是样本1通过、输入0失败的局部测试反例。没有系统、它的评估原则或将同一评估原则用于自身的行为；selfAssessmentSamples只是名称。应撤回当前自评对应，或建立有解释依据的自评对象与行为实例。这个算术结果可有限说明局部通过不能保证普遍正确，但后者不等同于原文的反身对象关系。 -4. r-121-c4：invalidation_restores_fixture修改了实现，令acknowledged与cached同步；原文此句说修订评估方法，比较两个候选的update–read序列并保留静态案例。不能把修复实现当成修订评估方法。最小修正是将映射改为实际update_read_counterexample加original_comparison/unchanged_update_retained，并仍标partial；正向失效更新实例可保留为额外候选示例，不能凭它证明测试集合保留或评估流程已形式化。 - -## 有限成立之处及保留界限 - -- 实际类型叫Aspect，具有empirical/inferential/value三个构造子，源码没有Kind声明。这是应用预设分类而非完整认识论分类的证明。Duties保留同一claim/grounds对及每个实际适用面的责任；mixed_projection只是由已假设的Duties投影，不构成外部责任已履行的证据。bothExamined及empiricalOnly是编号/标签记录，未实现经验考察的不确定性、推论支持关系或价值批评责任。标签遗漏反例能说明该接口的责任不随labels变化，不能证明真实适用分类已穷尽。 -- Consistent的整个held列表可产生联合后果，p/pImpliesQ/notQ确实触发一个context的正反结论；撤回及不同context示例提供有限对应。context把问题/假设/含义/范围折叠，推论关系是一个预设实例而非通用逻辑系统。ChangeReported只在实质撤回实例中对应明确；一般List不等会把重排或重复也视为变化，不能泛称语义变化判定器。 -- R1：namedUniversalTruth明确为h:P推出P，不是无条件普遍真理。0≤1与被2反驳的∀n,n≤1构成条件/量词改变的具体反例，支持“证明这个陈述不能自动建立另一个陈述”的有限说明。different_statement_refuted确实断言这个选定更强命题为假；这可以是具体见证，但中文英文解释均须避免提升为“凡对应失败，散文主张必假”。未编码一般证明可靠性、任意编码对应或哲学承诺的真假。r-77-c1与c4仍未映射。 -- 软件初态10/10、预算6下时延5/2均合格；updateOnly改为11后缓存仍10，直接读取11。它们实现源案例的一个明确反例，未建模真实时延、并发或全部故障。budget3是另一情境，预算定理仅覆盖r-119-c2合取义务的时延部分，新鲜度责任仍未表达。 -- 当前rationale.L120（r-120-c2至c6）没有任何声明映射，旧method-stage对应已撤回；这是正确保留缺口。此处的Grounds/Consistency/Reflexivity/可审查性推论不能由算术状态定理替代。r-119-c1与r-120-c1等“Additional premises”“Inference”只是表格角色，已标not_applicable。 - -## 范围与自检 - -本轮对所有16个已映射子句逐项检查了实际声明；未宣称全部未映射子句已做同等深度编码评审。结构、表格角色名称与实质论断分开，源文仍完整保留。模型失败不改写原文；既有初评与hash不变。判断标准没有因作者声明“checked”或“limited”而降低，partial也不意味着完整子句已被证明。有限接口可作为可读实例；错误的直接对应应修正而不是仅靠总体免责声明稀释。 - -没有必要递归委派或重跑相同构建。后续仅需比较有实质变化的映射/编码和文稿陈述，并分别保留原判与新判。未执行维护文件修改或哲学采用。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index 90b1632..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/source-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,47 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `5a292830b2fdb6e0670049bf56bbb278416fd2418272e4d586bd8f0f904386b8`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Independent source-only initial assessment — frozen - -Date: 2026-09-13. Reviewer: reader_source_initial. This record precedes disclosure of any current candidate encoding, author verdict, or expected comparison result. Selected baseline: `OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md` philosophy/core 0.1.3, English authority. Companion: `OrganonCore/docs/rationale.md`, non-normative. Goal supplied by caller: faithful limited Lean formalization and two-granularity English/Chinese explanations covering the 22 Core text units and the complete rationale. No candidate has been assessed here, and this is not an adoption judgment. - -## Provenance and limits of independence - -Read the supplied Core AGENTS, PHILOSOPHY and rationale in full; RTK instructions; assess, principled-review, wording-review, shared iteration and philosophy-resolution instructions; translation guidance. No candidate code, author rationale, prior detailed review, blind translation, or archive package was opened. AGENTS instructed starting local records from ACTIVE.md; reading that index incidentally exposed one-line historical task summaries, including an earlier description of Assessment as an accepted conditional normative interface. Those summaries are not source evidence and are not used to determine this judgment. This limited exposure prevents claiming complete ignorance of historical verdict metadata. Exact source clauses, not that summary, ground the distinctions below. No recursive delegation occurred. - -## Initial judgment and expected fidelity boundaries - -The source supports a limited formal interpretation of selected responsibility and support relations, if the interpretation explicitly preserves normative force, applicability, and the distinction between supporting a claim and examining its support. It does not supply a complete formal ontology, inference calculus, support metric, or source-to-model correspondence proof. The success of a Lean check could establish an encoded statement under its assumptions; its relevance to the prose remains a separate judgment. Unknown correspondence is not a pass, a core conflict, or proof that the source is defective. - -1. Core preamble: adopted commitments, meanings, and application limits constitute the authority; they are not descriptive laws of every system. Charter and Grounds mutually constrain each other without priority or deductive hierarchy. Rationale and contextual skill requirements must retain their separate status. -2. Self-Transcendence: expansion is valued, not merely allowed. Organization, methods and principles remain revisable. Orientation, permission, actual change and supported achievement are different. Universal nonfinality within the relevant existing forms does not impose change on every action, guarantee progress, exclude justified stability, or demand independence from external help. -3. Internal Consistency: preserve simultaneous holding and implications, same question, assumptions, meanings and scope. Changing or withdrawing a judgment may remove co-holding; concealed redefinition cannot erase a prior contradiction. Tension is not yet contradiction. Compatibility cannot stand for correctness, adequacy or inferential entailment. -4. Reflexivity: both system and formation/application/revision of principles are assessment and generation objects, subject to their applicable conditions. No self exemption when conditions hold, no unconditional application of every principle to itself. Self-application and internally produced revision do not establish correctness or sufficient grounds. -5. Grounds and Assessment: articulability identifies concepts, assumptions, reasons and limits. Assessment examines whether those grounds support the corresponding claim; completing it may establish insufficient support. It must not be encoded as an obligation to obtain a successful support verdict, nor as a completed marker lacking claim/grounds/conditions correspondence. Each applicable mixed aspect retains its responsibility even without a classification tag. Empirical assessment examines evidence/performance plus support conditions, scope and uncertainty; inferential assessment examines assumptions and inferential relations; value assessment states position, reasons, limits and consequences and stays open to relevant criticism. An initial value commitment need not prove every starting assumption. The general proportionate-support constraint limits claims; it does not guarantee all assessed claims are supported. -6. Scope and tools: local agreement cannot establish unconditional universals or absence of omitted differences. Measurement, repetition and frameworks can be useful but form no universally mandatory chain. A verifiable unreproduced observation may offer limited support; stochastic output identity and stability of conclusions are different. -7. Capability claims: application-specific definitions and conditions determine the actual claim. External evidence may support a capability without internal explanation; reliable output does not automatically establish understanding. An application may explicitly require explanation. Counts alone do not establish expansion. Narrowing a definition creates a new claim and cannot retroactively prove the old one. -8. Choice commitment: relevant reasons connect priority to objectives, values and constraints. Name, convention or status alone are insufficient; tradition may embody an explicitly adopted value with a relevant connection. This additional commitment is not derived merely from grouping it under Grounds. Openness does not imply equivalence, multiple feasible means, mandatory novelty, or rejection of established methods. Internal method properties may matter. -9. Relationships and terms: retain all foregoing distinctions under mutual application; no self-proof follows. “Assessment” includes reasons, applicability and observed performance and is not limited to executable tests. Read that list with the type-appropriate assessment responsibilities rather than silently making empirical outcome evidence mandatory for every claim type. -10. Rationale: preserve arguments’ premises, objections and limits, historical placement assertions as assertions of this text, and all illustrative cases. Removal checks concern loss of an explicit contribution, expressly not formal independence. Hypothetical research/software examples add contextual values and constraints; potential contributions and bounded support are not actual proof of domain-wide improvement. Repository tools, English authority, independent-first review and records are contextual arrangements rather than philosophical theorems. -11. Formal-proof example (rationale line 77): the hypothesis includes a checked proof whose encoding changes the claim’s conditions or claim-to-grounds relation. Its encoded statement is established relative to assumptions and proof dependencies, but this does not thereby establish the different prose claim. Correspondence failure is initially a modeling finding, not itself a reason to revise the commitment. A formalization must keep checked derivation, source interpretation and support relevance separately reviewable. Non-entailment must not be replaced by falsity of the prose conclusion. - -## Questions not fixed by the source - -- “Intrinsic orientation when expansion is regarded as worth pursuing” supplies an intended meaning but no measurable criterion or complete equivalence schema. A model’s precise predicate/definition is an interpretation to disclose. -- Contradiction, relevant implications, and the admissible inference calculus are not algorithmically fixed. Selecting classical proposition logic, a finite claim domain, or a closure rule adds modeling choices. -- Proportionate support has no universal numerical or ordered scale in the text. Claim/grounds correspondence and sufficient support require interpreted relations and contextual evidence; their names alone cannot establish them. -- Applicable aspects are not supplied as an exhaustive classification algorithm. A finite aspect datatype can be a bounded application interface only if its coverage limits and unclassified cases are explicit. -- The Assessment terminology row does not define a formal selector for when observed-performance examination applies. Its claim-appropriate context rules out silently making empirical evidence a universal prerequisite; an exact selector remains an additional interpretation. -- The proof example contains no concrete model or correspondence test; it cannot determine an unseen candidate’s fidelity. The software example does not fully specify concurrency semantics or all workloads; the research example supplies no actual study results. These are bounded examples, not omissions to fill as source commitments. -- The rationale’s external simplicity-source attribution has been preserved but not independently fact-checked in this source-only task. No judgment about the external article’s accuracy is offered. - -These are interpretation and support boundaries, not established contradictions in the philosophy. None authorizes changing the adopted commitments. - -## Coverage and bounded self-check - -`source-inventory.json` preserves exact text and line numbers for every nonempty source line, including every paragraph, table row, heading, ID and metadata line. Each substantive entry has a source-specific initial reading of force, conditions, intended contribution and unresolved questions, plus first-pass clause splits and force/scope markers. Splitting is not a formal parse; nested semantic clauses can remain. Structural rows carry no independent philosophical obligations. The Core has exactly 22 stable IDs: 20 directly contain substantive text and two (`organon.charter`, `organon.relationships`) are structural groupings. They must not be populated with invented commitments merely to match a count. - -Actual checks: the inventory contains 202 exact nonempty lines (Core 99; rationale 103), with 119 substantive paragraph/table entries. These are documentary coverage checks, not whole-text semantic-completeness certification. No model, proof, bilingual candidate or actual reader outcome was inspected. No claim is made about universal adequacy, formal independence, minimality, or philosophical truth. - -Bounded review of this record: consistency checked by keeping responsibilities separate from successful outcomes and current commitments separate from contextual methods; completeness is limited to the supplied source and first-pass clause readings; external adequacy of hypothetical cases cannot be inferred without actual evidence; a concrete correspondence counterexample can revise a later candidate judgment; a static inventory need not display a system’s generative orientation; no comparative parsimony advantage is claimed without a comparable alternative. An initial inventory is useful as a traceable baseline, not sufficient as fidelity evidence. Stop here until candidate disclosure supplies new evidence. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index 582c09a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/reviews/summary.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ -# Reported source fidelity - -These are reported semantic judgments, not kernel conclusions. Initial records precede comparison; revised mappings have informed follow-up judgments. Two rejected attempts have editorial current-result wording; their original independent reasons and verdicts remain in the initial comparison export. The bound records and exact object hashes are listed in fidelity.json. Unmodeled entries remain pending; structure is not a philosophical theorem. - -## r-77-c2 — partial - -namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. - -## r-77-c3 — partial - -The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. - -## r-119-c2 — partial - -budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. - -## r-119-c5 — partial - -original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. - -## r-121-c2 — partial - -The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. - -## r-121-c3 — partial - -A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. - -## r-121-c4 — partial - -compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json deleted file mode 100644 index 8f23b0d..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/run.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4126 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "source": { - "kind": "text", - "path": "snapshots/source.md", - "snapshot": "snapshots/source.md", - "sha256": "86ad928559159ccfbb7e38f883a214d457c4a5a9df0c365c07fd1389c6bd964c", - "spans": [ - { - "id": "rationale.L1", - "start_line": 1, - "end_line": 1 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L2", - "start_line": 2, - "end_line": 2 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L3", - "start_line": 3, - "end_line": 3 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L4", - "start_line": 4, - "end_line": 4 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L5", - "start_line": 5, - "end_line": 5 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L6", - "start_line": 6, - "end_line": 6 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L7", - "start_line": 7, - "end_line": 7 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L8", - "start_line": 8, - "end_line": 8 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L9", - "start_line": 9, - "end_line": 9 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L10", - "start_line": 10, - "end_line": 10 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L11", - "start_line": 11, - "end_line": 11 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L12", - "start_line": 12, - "end_line": 12 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L13", - "start_line": 13, - "end_line": 13 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L14", - "start_line": 14, - "end_line": 14 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L15", - "start_line": 15, - "end_line": 15 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L16", - "start_line": 16, - "end_line": 16 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L17", - "start_line": 17, - "end_line": 17 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L18", - "start_line": 18, - "end_line": 18 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L19", - "start_line": 19, - "end_line": 19 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L20", - "start_line": 20, - "end_line": 20 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L21", - "start_line": 21, - "end_line": 21 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L22", - "start_line": 22, - "end_line": 22 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L23", - "start_line": 23, - "end_line": 23 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L24", - "start_line": 24, - "end_line": 24 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L25", - "start_line": 25, - "end_line": 25 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L26", - "start_line": 26, - "end_line": 26 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L27", - "start_line": 27, - "end_line": 27 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L28", - "start_line": 28, - "end_line": 28 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L29", - "start_line": 29, - "end_line": 29 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L30", - "start_line": 30, - "end_line": 30 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L31", - "start_line": 31, - "end_line": 31 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L32", - "start_line": 32, - "end_line": 32 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L33", - "start_line": 33, - "end_line": 33 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L34", - "start_line": 34, - "end_line": 34 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L35", - "start_line": 35, - "end_line": 35 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L36", - "start_line": 36, - "end_line": 36 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L37", - "start_line": 37, - "end_line": 37 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L38", - "start_line": 38, - "end_line": 38 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L39", - "start_line": 39, - "end_line": 39 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L40", - "start_line": 40, - "end_line": 40 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L41", - "start_line": 41, - "end_line": 41 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L42", - "start_line": 42, - "end_line": 42 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L43", - "start_line": 43, - "end_line": 43 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L44", - "start_line": 44, - "end_line": 44 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L45", - "start_line": 45, - "end_line": 45 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L46", - "start_line": 46, - "end_line": 46 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L47", - "start_line": 47, - "end_line": 47 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L48", - "start_line": 48, - "end_line": 48 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L49", - "start_line": 49, - "end_line": 49 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L50", - "start_line": 50, - "end_line": 50 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L51", - "start_line": 51, - "end_line": 51 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L52", - "start_line": 52, - "end_line": 52 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L53", - "start_line": 53, - "end_line": 53 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L54", - "start_line": 54, - "end_line": 54 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L55", - "start_line": 55, - "end_line": 55 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L56", - "start_line": 56, - "end_line": 56 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L57", - "start_line": 57, - "end_line": 57 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L58", - "start_line": 58, - "end_line": 58 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L59", - "start_line": 59, - "end_line": 59 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L60", - "start_line": 60, - "end_line": 60 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L61", - "start_line": 61, - "end_line": 61 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L62", - "start_line": 62, - "end_line": 62 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L63", - "start_line": 63, - "end_line": 63 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L64", - "start_line": 64, - "end_line": 64 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L65", - "start_line": 65, - "end_line": 65 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L66", - "start_line": 66, - "end_line": 66 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L67", - "start_line": 67, - "end_line": 67 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L68", - "start_line": 68, - "end_line": 68 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L69", - "start_line": 69, - "end_line": 69 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L70", - "start_line": 70, - "end_line": 70 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L71", - "start_line": 71, - "end_line": 71 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L72", - "start_line": 72, - "end_line": 72 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L73", - "start_line": 73, - "end_line": 73 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L74", - "start_line": 74, - "end_line": 74 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L75", - "start_line": 75, - "end_line": 75 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L76", - "start_line": 76, - "end_line": 76 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L77", - "start_line": 77, - "end_line": 77 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L78", - "start_line": 78, - "end_line": 78 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L79", - "start_line": 79, - "end_line": 79 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L80", - "start_line": 80, - "end_line": 80 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L81", - "start_line": 81, - "end_line": 81 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L82", - "start_line": 82, - "end_line": 82 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L83", - "start_line": 83, - "end_line": 83 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L84", - "start_line": 84, - "end_line": 84 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L85", - "start_line": 85, - "end_line": 85 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L86", - "start_line": 86, - "end_line": 86 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L87", - "start_line": 87, - "end_line": 87 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L88", - "start_line": 88, - "end_line": 88 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L89", - "start_line": 89, - "end_line": 89 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L90", - "start_line": 90, - "end_line": 90 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L91", - "start_line": 91, - "end_line": 91 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L92", - "start_line": 92, - "end_line": 92 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L93", - "start_line": 93, - "end_line": 93 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L94", - "start_line": 94, - "end_line": 94 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L95", - "start_line": 95, - "end_line": 95 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L96", - "start_line": 96, - "end_line": 96 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L97", - "start_line": 97, - "end_line": 97 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L98", - "start_line": 98, - "end_line": 98 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L99", - "start_line": 99, - "end_line": 99 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L100", - "start_line": 100, - "end_line": 100 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L101", - "start_line": 101, - "end_line": 101 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L102", - "start_line": 102, - "end_line": 102 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L103", - "start_line": 103, - "end_line": 103 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L104", - "start_line": 104, - "end_line": 104 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L105", - "start_line": 105, - "end_line": 105 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L106", - "start_line": 106, - "end_line": 106 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L107", - "start_line": 107, - "end_line": 107 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L108", - "start_line": 108, - "end_line": 108 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L109", - "start_line": 109, - "end_line": 109 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L110", - "start_line": 110, - "end_line": 110 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L111", - "start_line": 111, - "end_line": 111 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L112", - "start_line": 112, - "end_line": 112 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L113", - "start_line": 113, - "end_line": 113 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L114", - "start_line": 114, - "end_line": 114 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L115", - "start_line": 115, - "end_line": 115 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L116", - "start_line": 116, - "end_line": 116 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L117", - "start_line": 117, - "end_line": 117 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L118", - "start_line": 118, - "end_line": 118 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L119", - "start_line": 119, - "end_line": 119 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L120", - "start_line": 120, - "end_line": 120 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L121", - "start_line": 121, - "end_line": 121 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L122", - "start_line": 122, - "end_line": 122 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L123", - "start_line": 123, - "end_line": 123 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L124", - "start_line": 124, - "end_line": 124 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L125", - "start_line": 125, - "end_line": 125 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L126", - "start_line": 126, - "end_line": 126 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L127", - "start_line": 127, - "end_line": 127 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L128", - "start_line": 128, - "end_line": 128 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L129", - "start_line": 129, - "end_line": 129 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L130", - "start_line": 130, - "end_line": 130 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L131", - "start_line": 131, - "end_line": 131 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L132", - "start_line": 132, - "end_line": 132 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L133", - "start_line": 133, - "end_line": 133 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L134", - "start_line": 134, - "end_line": 134 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L135", - "start_line": 135, - "end_line": 135 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L136", - "start_line": 136, - "end_line": 136 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L137", - "start_line": 137, - "end_line": 137 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L138", - "start_line": 138, - "end_line": 138 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L139", - "start_line": 139, - "end_line": 139 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L140", - "start_line": 140, - "end_line": 140 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L141", - "start_line": 141, - "end_line": 141 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L142", - "start_line": 142, - "end_line": 142 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L143", - "start_line": 143, - "end_line": 143 - } - ] - }, - "baseline": { - "path": "snapshots/philosophy.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" - }, - "project": { - "path": "leanified", - "root_module": "RationaleReader" - }, - "preregistration": { - "path": "PREREGISTERED.md", - "sha256": "fcfbe0b6daf4ff8498d085e5ce4a677737cca418cf1cda957a1110a9d86c5d15" - }, - "units": [ - { - "id": "rationale.L1", - "hash": "668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L2", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L3", - "hash": "ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "claim": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "claim": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L4", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L5", - "hash": "933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "claim": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "claim": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "claim": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L6", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L7", - "hash": "1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L8", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L9", - "hash": "a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L10", - "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L11", - "hash": "d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "claim": "Generative Drive", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "claim": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "claim": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "claim": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L12", - "hash": "fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "claim": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "claim": "Charter, unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "claim": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L13", - "hash": "64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "claim": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "claim": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "claim": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "claim": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L14", - "hash": "6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "claim": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "claim": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "claim": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "claim": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "claim": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L15", - "hash": "33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "claim": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "claim": "The provision and its conditions remain.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "claim": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L16", - "hash": "a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "claim": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "claim": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "claim": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "claim": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L17", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L18", - "hash": "0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L19", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L20", - "hash": "10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L21", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L22", - "hash": "f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "claim": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "claim": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L23", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L24", - "hash": "4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L25", - "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L26", - "hash": "4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "claim": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "claim": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "claim": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "claim": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "claim": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L27", - "hash": "7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "claim": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "claim": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "claim": "This supports examining their compatibility.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "claim": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "claim": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "claim": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L28", - "hash": "104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "claim": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "claim": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "claim": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "claim": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "claim": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L29", - "hash": "9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "claim": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "claim": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "claim": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "claim": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "claim": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "claim": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L30", - "hash": "60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "claim": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "claim": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "claim": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "claim": "They are not disallowed;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "claim": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "claim": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L31", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L32", - "hash": "7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "claim": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "claim": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "claim": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L33", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L34", - "hash": "4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L35", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L36", - "hash": "caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "claim": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "claim": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "claim": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L37", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L38", - "hash": "3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "claim": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "claim": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "claim": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "claim": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "claim": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L39", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L40", - "hash": "b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "claim": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "claim": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "claim": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "claim": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "claim": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L41", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L42", - "hash": "54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L43", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L44", - "hash": "8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "claim": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "claim": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "claim": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "claim": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L45", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L46", - "hash": "0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L47", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L48", - "hash": "956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "claim": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "claim": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "claim": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "claim": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "claim": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "claim": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "claim": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "claim": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L49", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L50", - "hash": "4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "claim": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "claim": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "claim": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "claim": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "claim": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L51", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L52", - "hash": "219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L53", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L54", - "hash": "d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L55", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L56", - "hash": "90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "claim": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "claim": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L57", - "hash": "d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "claim": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "claim": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "claim": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "claim": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L58", - "hash": "b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "claim": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "claim": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "claim": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L59", - "hash": "34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "claim": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "claim": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L60", - "hash": "66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "claim": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L61", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L62", - "hash": "c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "claim": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "claim": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "claim": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L63", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L64", - "hash": "97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L65", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L66", - "hash": "959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "claim": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "claim": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "claim": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L67", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L68", - "hash": "08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L69", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L70", - "hash": "d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "claim": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "claim": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "claim": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L71", - "hash": "9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "claim": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "claim": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "claim": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L72", - "hash": "02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "claim": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "claim": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L73", - "hash": "e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "claim": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "claim": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "claim": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L74", - "hash": "330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "claim": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "claim": "This violates internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "claim": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L75", - "hash": "34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "claim": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "claim": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L76", - "hash": "1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "claim": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "claim": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "claim": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L77", - "hash": "10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "claim": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "claim": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "claim": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "claim": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L78", - "hash": "6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "claim": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "claim": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "claim": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L79", - "hash": "e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "claim": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "claim": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "claim": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "claim": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L80", - "hash": "cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "claim": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "claim": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "claim": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L81", - "hash": "06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "claim": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "claim": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "claim": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "claim": "These capability definitions come from the application.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L82", - "hash": "bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "claim": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "claim": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "claim": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "claim": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L83", - "hash": "3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "claim": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "claim": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "claim": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "claim": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L84", - "hash": "252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "claim": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "claim": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L85", - "hash": "25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "claim": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "claim": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "claim": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L86", - "hash": "a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "claim": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "claim": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "claim": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L87", - "hash": "2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "claim": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "claim": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L88", - "hash": "b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "claim": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "claim": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "claim": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L89", - "hash": "9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "claim": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "claim": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "claim": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "claim": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L90", - "hash": "b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "claim": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "claim": "Renaming alone adds no support.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "claim": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L91", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L92", - "hash": "bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L93", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L94", - "hash": "8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "claim": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "claim": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "claim": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "claim": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L95", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L96", - "hash": "30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "claim": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "claim": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "claim": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "claim": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L97", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L98", - "hash": "310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "claim": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "claim": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "claim": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L99", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L100", - "hash": "e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L101", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L102", - "hash": "23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "claim": "The following are hypothetical applications.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "claim": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "claim": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L103", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L104", - "hash": "e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L105", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L106", - "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L107", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L108", - "hash": "b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "claim": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "claim": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L109", - "hash": "51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "claim": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "claim": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "claim": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "claim": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "claim": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L110", - "hash": "bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "claim": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "claim": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "claim": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "claim": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "claim": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L111", - "hash": "b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "claim": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "claim": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "claim": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "claim": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "claim": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "claim": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L112", - "hash": "2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "claim": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "claim": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "claim": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "claim": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "claim": "the number of labels alone cannot.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "claim": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "claim": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "claim": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L113", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L114", - "hash": "ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L115", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L116", - "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L117", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L118", - "hash": "7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "claim": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "claim": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L119", - "hash": "2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "claim": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "claim": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "claim": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "claim": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "claim": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "claim": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "claim": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L120", - "hash": "4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "claim": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "claim": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "claim": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "claim": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "claim": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L121", - "hash": "572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "claim": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "claim": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "claim": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "claim": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "claim": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L122", - "hash": "b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "claim": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "claim": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "claim": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "claim": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "claim": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L123", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L124", - "hash": "a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "claim": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "claim": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "claim": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L125", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L126", - "hash": "e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L127", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L128", - "hash": "138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "claim": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "claim": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L129", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L130", - "hash": "9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L131", - "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L132", - "hash": "d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "claim": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "claim": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "claim": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "claim": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "claim": "Another project could select a different language.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L133", - "hash": "044d412b20f7cbb26cd3baf8808637646e4c4c130de12310c4bfbd734c7b31f1", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "Revised implementation rationale; no Lean proof is supplied for this row.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c1", - "claim": "A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c2", - "claim": "Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c3", - "claim": "Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c4", - "claim": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c5", - "claim": "Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c6", - "claim": "Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-v2-c7", - "claim": "The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "Explanatory implementation choice or limit; not modeled as a Lean theorem." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L134", - "hash": "4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "claim": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "claim": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "claim": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "claim": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "claim": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L135", - "hash": "7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "claim": "`organon-core-principled-review`", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "claim": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "claim": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "claim": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "claim": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "claim": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L136", - "hash": "0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "claim": "External `grill-me/grilling`", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "claim": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "claim": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "claim": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "claim": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L137", - "hash": "89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "claim": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "claim": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "claim": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "claim": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "claim": "A consensus is not proof.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "claim": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L138", - "hash": "c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "claim": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "claim": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "claim": "These are contextual method requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "claim": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L139", - "hash": "57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "claim": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "claim": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "claim": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "claim": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "claim": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L140", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L141", - "hash": "46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "claim": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "claim": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "claim": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "claim": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L142", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L143", - "hash": "0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "claim": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "claim": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "claim": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "claim": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - } - ], - "declarations": [ - { - "name": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c5" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c2" - }, - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c3" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c4" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c3" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c3" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c4" - } - ] - } - ], - "cases": [ - { - "id": "original_comparison", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "update_read_counterexample", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "cached_freshness_refuted", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "unchanged_update_retained", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "budget_change_is_distinct", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "namedUniversalTruth", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "encoded_statement", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "different_statement_refuted", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "proof_of_different_claim", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "revised_method_retains_case", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", - "kind": "method_coverage_fixture", - "expectation": "Compute both read implementations on initial and post-update states, retaining the initial case; no implementation is changed." - } - ] -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md deleted file mode 100644 index 3705ff1..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/philosophy.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,153 +0,0 @@ ---- -format_version: 0.1.0 -philosophy_version: 0.1.3 -core_version: 0.1.3 -derived_from: null ---- -# Organon Philosophy: Charter and Grounds - - -This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. - -The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](docs/rationale.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. - -## 1. Charter - - -### 1.1 Overview - - -**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** - -> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. - -The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. - -### 1.2 Self-Transcendence - - -> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. - -#### 1.2.1 Generative Orientation - - -A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. - -#### 1.2.2 Non-finality - - -Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. - -#### 1.2.3 Grounds for Achievement and Limits - - -Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. - -- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. -- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. -- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. -- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. - -### 1.3 Internal Consistency - - -> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. - -#### 1.3.1 Meaning - - -“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. - -“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. - -#### 1.3.2 Conditions and Limits - - -- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. -- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. - -### 1.4 Reflexivity - - -> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. - -#### 1.4.1 Meaning - - -Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. - -#### 1.4.2 Conditions and Limits - - -- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. -- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. -- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. - -## 2. Grounds - - -> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. - -### 2.1 Articulation and Responsibilities of Assessment - - -Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. - -| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | -| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | -| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | - -Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. - -### 2.2 Relations, Scope, and the Limits of Measurement - - -Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. - -Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. - -An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. - -### 2.3 Capability Claims - - -Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. - -Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. - -### 2.4 Implementation Choices: Openness to Alternatives - - -> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. - -This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. - -#### 2.4.1 Conditions and Limits - - -- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. -- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. -- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. -- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. - -## 3. Relationships and Necessary Terms - - -### 3.1 Roles and Mutual Constraints - - -The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. - -Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. - -Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. - -### 3.2 Necessary Terms - - -| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | -| --- | --- | -| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | -| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md deleted file mode 100644 index e55f231..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale-core-tools/snapshots/source.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,143 +0,0 @@ -# Organon Rationale - -This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). It does not add obligations to the philosophy. - -Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. - -## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status - -| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Generative Drive | Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. | Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. | -| Internal Consistency and Reflexivity | Charter, unchanged. | Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. | -| Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries | Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. | General requirements and limits retain their normative force. The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. | -| Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation | Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. | The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. | -| Openness to Alternative Implementations | Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. | The provision and its conditions remain. Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. | -| Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships | Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. | Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. | - -## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits - -### 2.1 Commitments and Objections - -The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. - -| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Self-Transcendence | Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. | Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. | -| Internal Consistency | If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. This supports examining their compatibility. | A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. | -| Reflexivity | A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. | Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. | -| Grounds | When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. | Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. | -| Openness to Alternative Implementations | If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. | Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. They are not disallowed; the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. | - -These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. - -### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications - -The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. The current core withdraws that uniform definition. Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. - -External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. - -This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. - -### 2.3 Assessment Tools - -Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. Each choice needs contextual reasons. These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. - -### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method - -The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. - -This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. - -## 3. Removal Check - -| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | -| --- | --- | -| Self-Transcendence | The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. | -| Internal Consistency | There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. | -| Reflexivity | Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. | -| Grounds | The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. | -| Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds | General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. | - -The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. - -## 4. Illustrative Cases - -The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. These examine the meaning of the philosophy; they are not steps a system is required to execute. - -| Case | Judgment and limits | -| --- | --- | -| A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. | Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. | -| A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. | Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. | -| A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. | It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. | -| Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. | Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. | -| Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. | This violates internal consistency. Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. | -| A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. | This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. | -| Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. | Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. Grounds requires examination of the support relation. | -| A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. | The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. | -| A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. | It can be assessed as a value commitment. Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. | -| A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. | It may provide corresponding limited support. Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. | -| A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. | Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. | -| An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. | The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. These capability definitions come from the application. | -| An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. | Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. | -| An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; the same reliable black box cannot do so. | Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. | -| After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. | A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. | -| A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. | The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. | -| An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. | Conventional use is not the sole ground. Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. | -| An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. | Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. | -| Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. | This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. | -| A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. | Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. | -| An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. | Renaming alone adds no support. Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. | - -## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction - -Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. - -Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. - -Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; they cannot replace philosophical argument. These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. - -## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems - -The following are hypothetical applications. Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; their conclusions hold within those premises. - -### 6.1 Research Team - -| Argument element | Application | -| --- | --- | -| Claim | A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. | -| Additional premises | The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; the material does not establish population prevalence. | -| Inference | Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. | -| Counterexample | An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. | -| Conclusion | The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; the number of labels alone cannot. Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. | - -### 6.2 Software System - -| Argument element | Application | -| --- | --- | -| Claim | A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. | -| Additional premises | The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. | -| Inference | Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. | -| Counterexample | Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. | -| Conclusion | The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. | - -The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. - -## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form - -The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. - -| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | -| --- | --- | --- | -| English authority with a corresponding Chinese version | The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. | No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. Another project could select a different language. | -| A text-centered philosophy with Lean tooling | Text states the philosophical commitments and keeps their reasons and limits inspectable. Lean implementations, checks, and reader manuscripts provide reproducible formalization support. | Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. Tool success does not establish source fidelity, sufficient grounds, or philosophical correctness. Lean is not a prerequisite for ordinary philosophical assessment. The tooling is a revisable implementation choice under this repository’s objectives and constraints. | -| `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` | Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. | Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. | -| `organon-core-principled-review` | A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. | Findings retain their standards and limits; they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. | -| External `grill-me/grilling` | Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. | A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. | -| An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal | A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. | Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. A consensus is not proof. A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. | -| Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations | This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. | These are contextual method requirements. A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. | -| A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment | Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. | A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. | - -Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. - -The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md deleted file mode 100644 index a65a742..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/PREREGISTERED.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,17 +0,0 @@ -# New compact models — registered before Lean authoring - -These are new bounded encodings for readable evidence, not unchanged replays of all older projects. Historical Core/Rationale models remain untouched; unretained results do not silently become current results. Inventory all original content, map only explicit selected fragments. No whole philosophical text is expected to be proved. - -Core fragments: responsibility quantified over actual applicable aspects of the same claim/grounds pair, independently of labels; domain relation supplied and not self-validating. Preserve empirical/value mixed applicability via concrete claim-aspect fixture and wrong-grounds/reported-label variants. The full articulation, basis quality, proportionality, value criticism and all listed empirical/inferential duties remain unmodeled by this narrower interface; do not label whole Assessment passed. Separate sufficient support from truth using a finite observation set with an explicitly stated universal-coverage sufficiency criterion for all natural inputs; bounded observations cannot establish a universal property, whether the property is actually true or false. - -Consistency: whole held-set input to an explicit consequence relation, context/question/polarity; a concrete P, P→Q, ¬Q fixture uses a registered one-step consequence for this case, not a general logical calculus. Joint inconsistency, removal of ¬Q, and opposite judgments under distinct contexts get actual probes. A separate changed-content reporting obligation is an interface, not an assertion a real change was reported. - -Reflexivity: concrete arithmetic principle n+1=2*n checked on sample1 can pass while counterexample0 refutes it; evaluating oneself is a separate recorded action. This supplies a relevant finite counterexample to self-assessment alone implying correctness, not a general diagnosis of every system or proof that the normative provision is obeyed. - -Rationale R1: actual conditional identity theorem h:P⊢P plus a true coded arithmetic claim and false different prose claim; exact arithmetic counterexample illustrates that a proof of one statement does not prove a different stronger statement. Missing bridge is a modeling finding, not proof that philosophical commitments fail. It is an illustration of the accepted R1 row, never a mathematical proof of every prose correspondence judgment. - -Rationale software/L119: ServiceState contains acknowledged and cached natural values; direct read reads acknowledged, cache reads cached; updateOnly changes acknowledged and retains cached. Initial10/10, original latencies5/2,budget6 both acceptable; update11 yields11/10. Original-match plus later-mismatch witnesses failure of global equivalence. Positive invalidating update sets both11; unchanged update10 retains agreement. Withdraw any mapping to method-stage lists. Separate tightened budget3 is a different context, not the original case. - -Rationale removal arguments and value/historical/general method effectiveness claims remain source-inventoried but unproved unless a reviewed direct correspondence is available. No Boolean encoding of arbitrary truth values substitutes for an empirical or value argument. All new declarations and cases will be root-imported and audited with fixed Lean4.33.1/core; no project axioms or sorry. - -Source initial and code-only explanation are independent roles. Initial coding model tests may precede fidelity acceptance, but published passed/limited states require the recorded corresponding review. New model tradeoff: intentionally small exact worked fragments for readers instead of importing large legacy interfaces with stale provenance; report reduced retained proof coverage, not a formalization improvement by line count. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean deleted file mode 100644 index d2976ce..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/audit.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,21 +0,0 @@ -import RationaleReader -#check RationaleReader.original_comparison -#print axioms RationaleReader.original_comparison -#check RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -#print axioms RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -#check RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -#print axioms RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -#check RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -#print axioms RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -#check RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -#print axioms RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -#check RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -#print axioms RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -#check RationaleReader.encoded_statement -#print axioms RationaleReader.encoded_statement -#check RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -#print axioms RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -#check RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -#print axioms RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -#check RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -#print axioms RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json deleted file mode 100644 index f6e4bd8..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-kernel.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,45 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", - "baseline_sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", - "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "raw_summary_sha256": "25c3e4c55898a2f4768b4069b7a4b872a8b38ffc41b69b689b249164ac737344", - "record_note": "Extract of an actual check; machine-specific evidence directory omitted. Kernel checking does not validate fidelity." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json deleted file mode 100644 index f6f4e2f..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2652 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "reported_reviews": [], - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "manuscript": { - "passed": true, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "current_source": "current", - "current_baseline": "current", - "errors": [], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "limited" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "not_applicable" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "incomplete" - } - ], - "manifest_sha256": "bce2fcebdfa3adb21aa636f59fbe69d5de1aa2162c09ad861922df2b9d49a7f4" - }, - "kernel_passed": true, - "actual_summary_sha256": "b4c97914c3d09858893ed73432b15be209059e79bb2411e1a4b265f6e7233bf2", - "checker_sha256": { - "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "477e9bd0e87f4abb1748dba017952e1e03794900bbdb3dda3fbfa423990a6fb7", - "skills/organon-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" - }, - "record_note": "Actual final check with machine-specific evidence-directory field omitted; semantic judgments remain reported." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json deleted file mode 100644 index 2e578cf..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/kernel.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,42 +0,0 @@ -{ - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "errors": [], - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "passed": true, - "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44" -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log deleted file mode 100644 index 759779a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lake-build.log +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4 +0,0 @@ -✔ [2/3] Built RationaleReader (195ms) -Build completed successfully (3 jobs). -info: RationaleReader: no previous manifest, creating one from scratch -info: toolchain not updated; already up-to-date diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log deleted file mode 100644 index 7fd934a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/lean-audit.log +++ /dev/null @@ -1,32 +0,0 @@ -RationaleReader.original_comparison : - RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ - RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency -'RationaleReader.original_comparison' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample : - RationaleReader.direct RationaleReader.initial = RationaleReader.cachedRead RationaleReader.initial ∧ - RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) ≠ - RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 11) -'RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted : - ¬∀ (n : Nat), RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial n) = n -'RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] -RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained : - RationaleReader.direct (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) = - RationaleReader.cachedRead (RationaleReader.updateOnly RationaleReader.initial 10) -'RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct : - RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.originalLatency ∧ - ¬RationaleReader.withinBudget RationaleReader.stricterLatency -'RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P -'RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.encoded_statement : 0 ≤ 1 -'RationaleReader.encoded_statement' does not depend on any axioms -RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted : ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 -'RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted' depends on axioms: [propext] -RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim : 0 ≤ 1 ∧ ¬∀ (n : Nat), n ≤ 1 -'RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim' depends on axioms: [propext] -RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case : - RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - RationaleReader.compareReads RationaleReader.revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] -'RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case' does not depend on any axioms diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json deleted file mode 100644 index 44fcf2d..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/manuscript-check.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2653 +0,0 @@ -{ - "passed": false, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "errors": [], - "checked": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "dependencies": { - "RationaleReader.original_comparison": [], - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample": [], - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained": [], - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct": [], - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth": [], - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement": [], - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim": [ - "propext" - ], - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case": [] - }, - "reported_reviews": [], - "build_returncode": 0, - "audit_returncode": 0, - "manuscript": { - "passed": false, - "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", - "current_source": "stale", - "current_baseline": "current", - "errors": [ - "Current source or adopted baseline drift: historical kernel evidence remains separate; current manuscript is stale" - ], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "kernel": "passed", - "reported_fidelity": "partial", - "reported_status": "limited", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reported_status": "not_applicable", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "kernel": "not_checked", - "reported_fidelity": "pending", - "reported_status": "incomplete", - "effective_status": "stale" - } - ], - "manifest_sha256": "973288f219afd1356b518894640b5d9035fe669cb5889759471ede2d0a443464" - }, - "kernel_passed": true, - "actual_summary_sha256": "5432b70b55389b0069c5669dd519b81788dfe9e7c12654d3c11902e5db3c6e2a", - "checker_sha256": { - "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "0e3e2ced77940ece0d2a6bebbb585afce0f0ce14d99cd880215ac7b560e976d1", - "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "45a6713732e843b8e6b928c4dc9e40e9f39fd9571b2b9f5d41752f7dd576d32f" - } -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean deleted file mode 100644 index 9cc82ed..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean +++ /dev/null @@ -1,105 +0,0 @@ -namespace RationaleReader - -structure ServiceState where - acknowledged : Nat - cached : Nat - deriving DecidableEq - -def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged - -def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached - -def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } - -def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ - -structure LatencyContext where - directLatency : Nat - cacheLatency : Nat - budget : Nat - -def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ - -def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ - -def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := - c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison -rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 -rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ - -def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] - -def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] - -def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := - states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide - -end RationaleReader diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml deleted file mode 100644 index b7ceaf5..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lakefile.toml +++ /dev/null @@ -1,5 +0,0 @@ -name = "RationaleReader" -version = "0.0.1" -defaultTargets = ["RationaleReader"] -[[lean_lib]] -name = "RationaleReader" diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain deleted file mode 100644 index a8afa7d..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/lean-toolchain +++ /dev/null @@ -1 +0,0 @@ -leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json deleted file mode 100644 index 533ec56..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/manuscript.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4155 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "repository_root": "../../..", - "source_current": { - "path": "../../../docs/rationale.md", - "sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44" - }, - "baseline_current": { - "path": "../../../PHILOSOPHY.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" - }, - "code_files": [ - { - "path": "leanified/RationaleReader.lean", - "sha256": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - } - ], - "review": { - "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", - "sha256": "862a6a182d6e1eb060557f2e1e7d7e424162ecae9da7a01885473730840138b0" - }, - "views": { - "overview_en": { - "path": "readers/en/rationale-overview.md", - "sha256": "f58fc391ade4b2fc798631020a6d856212854893a16a9f47893de5804e2d1002" - }, - "details_en": { - "path": "readers/en/rationale-details.md", - "sha256": "22bf07d6fb1258f45a16d7e695171ffe8df6c9c0eac84aceefc679e001e74759" - }, - "overview_zh": { - "path": "readers/zh/rationale-overview.md", - "sha256": "ba78b6fb1724f4277bd327564fced7f9a7537f331c2c5d1141ed228fdb20add8" - }, - "details_zh": { - "path": "readers/zh/rationale-details.md", - "sha256": "10e79091114b0159fec9b7c967480b022985049e04a33f7c33c70bd9655fd209" - } - }, - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "unit": "rationale.L1", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "# Organon Rationale\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "unit": "rationale.L2", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L3", - "clause": "r-3-c1", - "excerpt": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L3", - "clause": "r-3-c2", - "excerpt": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "unit": "rationale.L4", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L5", - "clause": "r-5-c1", - "excerpt": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L5", - "clause": "r-5-c2", - "excerpt": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L5", - "clause": "r-5-c3", - "excerpt": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "unit": "rationale.L6", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "unit": "rationale.L7", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "unit": "rationale.L8", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "unit": "rationale.L9", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "unit": "rationale.L10", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c1", - "excerpt": "Generative Drive", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c2", - "excerpt": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c3", - "excerpt": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L11", - "clause": "r-11-c4", - "excerpt": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L12", - "clause": "r-12-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L12", - "clause": "r-12-c2", - "excerpt": "Charter, unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L12", - "clause": "r-12-c3", - "excerpt": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c3", - "excerpt": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L13", - "clause": "r-13-c4", - "excerpt": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c1", - "excerpt": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c2", - "excerpt": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c3", - "excerpt": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c4", - "excerpt": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L14", - "clause": "r-14-c5", - "excerpt": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c3", - "excerpt": "The provision and its conditions remain.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L15", - "clause": "r-15-c4", - "excerpt": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c1", - "excerpt": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c2", - "excerpt": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c3", - "excerpt": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L16", - "clause": "r-16-c4", - "excerpt": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "unit": "rationale.L17", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "unit": "rationale.L18", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "unit": "rationale.L19", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "unit": "rationale.L20", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.1 Commitments and Objections\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "unit": "rationale.L21", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L22", - "clause": "r-22-c1", - "excerpt": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L22", - "clause": "r-22-c2", - "excerpt": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "unit": "rationale.L23", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "unit": "rationale.L24", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "unit": "rationale.L25", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c2", - "excerpt": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c3", - "excerpt": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c4", - "excerpt": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c5", - "excerpt": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L26", - "clause": "r-26-c6", - "excerpt": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c2", - "excerpt": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c3", - "excerpt": "This supports examining their compatibility.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c4", - "excerpt": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c5", - "excerpt": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L27", - "clause": "r-27-c6", - "excerpt": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c1", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c2", - "excerpt": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c3", - "excerpt": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c4", - "excerpt": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L28", - "clause": "r-28-c5", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c2", - "excerpt": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c3", - "excerpt": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c4", - "excerpt": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c5", - "excerpt": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L29", - "clause": "r-29-c6", - "excerpt": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c2", - "excerpt": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c3", - "excerpt": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c4", - "excerpt": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c5", - "excerpt": "They are not disallowed;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c6", - "excerpt": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L30", - "clause": "r-30-c7", - "excerpt": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "unit": "rationale.L31", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L32", - "clause": "r-32-c1", - "excerpt": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L32", - "clause": "r-32-c2", - "excerpt": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L32", - "clause": "r-32-c3", - "excerpt": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "unit": "rationale.L33", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "unit": "rationale.L34", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "unit": "rationale.L35", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L36", - "clause": "r-36-c1", - "excerpt": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L36", - "clause": "r-36-c2", - "excerpt": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L36", - "clause": "r-36-c3", - "excerpt": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "unit": "rationale.L37", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c1", - "excerpt": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c2", - "excerpt": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c3", - "excerpt": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c4", - "excerpt": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L38", - "clause": "r-38-c5", - "excerpt": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "unit": "rationale.L39", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c1", - "excerpt": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c2", - "excerpt": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c3", - "excerpt": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c4", - "excerpt": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L40", - "clause": "r-40-c5", - "excerpt": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "unit": "rationale.L41", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "unit": "rationale.L42", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.3 Assessment Tools\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "unit": "rationale.L43", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c1", - "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c2", - "excerpt": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c3", - "excerpt": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L44", - "clause": "r-44-c4", - "excerpt": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "unit": "rationale.L45", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "unit": "rationale.L46", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "unit": "rationale.L47", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c1", - "excerpt": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c2", - "excerpt": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c3", - "excerpt": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c4", - "excerpt": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c5", - "excerpt": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c6", - "excerpt": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c7", - "excerpt": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "unit": "rationale.L48", - "clause": "r-48-c8", - "excerpt": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "unit": "rationale.L49", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c1", - "excerpt": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c2", - "excerpt": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c3", - "excerpt": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c4", - "excerpt": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L50", - "clause": "r-50-c5", - "excerpt": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "unit": "rationale.L51", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "unit": "rationale.L52", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 3. Removal Check\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "unit": "rationale.L53", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "unit": "rationale.L54", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "unit": "rationale.L55", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L56", - "clause": "r-56-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L56", - "clause": "r-56-c2", - "excerpt": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L56", - "clause": "r-56-c3", - "excerpt": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c1", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c2", - "excerpt": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c3", - "excerpt": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L57", - "clause": "r-57-c4", - "excerpt": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L58", - "clause": "r-58-c1", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L58", - "clause": "r-58-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L58", - "clause": "r-58-c3", - "excerpt": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L59", - "clause": "r-59-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L59", - "clause": "r-59-c2", - "excerpt": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L60", - "clause": "r-60-c1", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L60", - "clause": "r-60-c2", - "excerpt": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "unit": "rationale.L61", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L62", - "clause": "r-62-c1", - "excerpt": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L62", - "clause": "r-62-c2", - "excerpt": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L62", - "clause": "r-62-c3", - "excerpt": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "unit": "rationale.L63", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "unit": "rationale.L64", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 4. Illustrative Cases\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "unit": "rationale.L65", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L66", - "clause": "r-66-c1", - "excerpt": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L66", - "clause": "r-66-c2", - "excerpt": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L66", - "clause": "r-66-c3", - "excerpt": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "unit": "rationale.L67", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "unit": "rationale.L68", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Case | Judgment and limits |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "unit": "rationale.L69", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L70", - "clause": "r-70-c1", - "excerpt": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L70", - "clause": "r-70-c2", - "excerpt": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L70", - "clause": "r-70-c3", - "excerpt": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L71", - "clause": "r-71-c1", - "excerpt": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L71", - "clause": "r-71-c2", - "excerpt": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L71", - "clause": "r-71-c3", - "excerpt": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L72", - "clause": "r-72-c1", - "excerpt": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L72", - "clause": "r-72-c2", - "excerpt": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L73", - "clause": "r-73-c1", - "excerpt": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L73", - "clause": "r-73-c2", - "excerpt": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L73", - "clause": "r-73-c3", - "excerpt": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L74", - "clause": "r-74-c1", - "excerpt": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L74", - "clause": "r-74-c2", - "excerpt": "This violates internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L74", - "clause": "r-74-c3", - "excerpt": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L75", - "clause": "r-75-c1", - "excerpt": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L75", - "clause": "r-75-c2", - "excerpt": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L76", - "clause": "r-76-c1", - "excerpt": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L76", - "clause": "r-76-c2", - "excerpt": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L76", - "clause": "r-76-c3", - "excerpt": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c1", - "excerpt": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c2", - "excerpt": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c3", - "excerpt": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", - "countermodel": { - "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "verification": "passed", - "target": "refuted", - "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", - "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." - } - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c4", - "excerpt": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L78", - "clause": "r-78-c1", - "excerpt": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L78", - "clause": "r-78-c2", - "excerpt": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L78", - "clause": "r-78-c3", - "excerpt": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c1", - "excerpt": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c2", - "excerpt": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c3", - "excerpt": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L79", - "clause": "r-79-c4", - "excerpt": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L80", - "clause": "r-80-c1", - "excerpt": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L80", - "clause": "r-80-c2", - "excerpt": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L80", - "clause": "r-80-c3", - "excerpt": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c1", - "excerpt": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c2", - "excerpt": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c3", - "excerpt": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L81", - "clause": "r-81-c4", - "excerpt": "These capability definitions come from the application.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c1", - "excerpt": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c2", - "excerpt": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c3", - "excerpt": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L82", - "clause": "r-82-c4", - "excerpt": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c1", - "excerpt": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c2", - "excerpt": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c3", - "excerpt": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L83", - "clause": "r-83-c4", - "excerpt": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L84", - "clause": "r-84-c1", - "excerpt": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L84", - "clause": "r-84-c2", - "excerpt": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L85", - "clause": "r-85-c1", - "excerpt": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L85", - "clause": "r-85-c2", - "excerpt": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L85", - "clause": "r-85-c3", - "excerpt": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L86", - "clause": "r-86-c1", - "excerpt": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L86", - "clause": "r-86-c2", - "excerpt": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L86", - "clause": "r-86-c3", - "excerpt": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L87", - "clause": "r-87-c1", - "excerpt": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L87", - "clause": "r-87-c2", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L87", - "clause": "r-87-c3", - "excerpt": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L88", - "clause": "r-88-c1", - "excerpt": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L88", - "clause": "r-88-c2", - "excerpt": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L88", - "clause": "r-88-c3", - "excerpt": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c1", - "excerpt": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c2", - "excerpt": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c3", - "excerpt": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L89", - "clause": "r-89-c4", - "excerpt": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L90", - "clause": "r-90-c1", - "excerpt": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L90", - "clause": "r-90-c2", - "excerpt": "Renaming alone adds no support.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L90", - "clause": "r-90-c3", - "excerpt": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "unit": "rationale.L91", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "unit": "rationale.L92", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "unit": "rationale.L93", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c1", - "excerpt": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c3", - "excerpt": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c4", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L94", - "clause": "r-94-c5", - "excerpt": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "unit": "rationale.L95", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c1", - "excerpt": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c2", - "excerpt": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c3", - "excerpt": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L96", - "clause": "r-96-c4", - "excerpt": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "unit": "rationale.L97", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L98", - "clause": "r-98-c1", - "excerpt": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L98", - "clause": "r-98-c2", - "excerpt": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L98", - "clause": "r-98-c3", - "excerpt": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "unit": "rationale.L99", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "unit": "rationale.L100", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "unit": "rationale.L101", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L102", - "clause": "r-102-c1", - "excerpt": "The following are hypothetical applications.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L102", - "clause": "r-102-c2", - "excerpt": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L102", - "clause": "r-102-c3", - "excerpt": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "unit": "rationale.L103", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "unit": "rationale.L104", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 6.1 Research Team\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "unit": "rationale.L105", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "unit": "rationale.L106", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "unit": "rationale.L107", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L108", - "clause": "r-108-c1", - "excerpt": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L108", - "clause": "r-108-c2", - "excerpt": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c1", - "excerpt": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c2", - "excerpt": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c3", - "excerpt": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c4", - "excerpt": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L109", - "clause": "r-109-c5", - "excerpt": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c1", - "excerpt": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c2", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c3", - "excerpt": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c4", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c5", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L110", - "clause": "r-110-c6", - "excerpt": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c1", - "excerpt": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c2", - "excerpt": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c3", - "excerpt": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c4", - "excerpt": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c5", - "excerpt": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L111", - "clause": "r-111-c6", - "excerpt": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c1", - "excerpt": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c2", - "excerpt": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c3", - "excerpt": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c4", - "excerpt": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c5", - "excerpt": "the number of labels alone cannot.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c6", - "excerpt": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c7", - "excerpt": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "unit": "rationale.L112", - "clause": "r-112-c8", - "excerpt": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "unit": "rationale.L113", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "unit": "rationale.L114", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "### 6.2 Software System\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "unit": "rationale.L115", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "unit": "rationale.L116", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Argument element | Application |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "unit": "rationale.L117", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L118", - "clause": "r-118-c1", - "excerpt": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L118", - "clause": "r-118-c2", - "excerpt": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c1", - "excerpt": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c2", - "excerpt": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c3", - "excerpt": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c4", - "excerpt": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c5", - "excerpt": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c6", - "excerpt": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c7", - "excerpt": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c1", - "excerpt": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c2", - "excerpt": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c3", - "excerpt": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c4", - "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c5", - "excerpt": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L120", - "clause": "r-120-c6", - "excerpt": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c1", - "excerpt": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c2", - "excerpt": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c3", - "excerpt": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", - "countermodel": { - "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "verification": "passed", - "target": "refuted", - "source_relation": "supports_nonentailment", - "reason": "The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference." - } - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c4", - "excerpt": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ], - "kernel": "passed", - "fidelity": "partial", - "status": "limited", - "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c5", - "excerpt": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c1", - "excerpt": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c2", - "excerpt": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c3", - "excerpt": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c4", - "excerpt": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c5", - "excerpt": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L122", - "clause": "r-122-c6", - "excerpt": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "unit": "rationale.L123", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L124", - "clause": "r-124-c1", - "excerpt": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L124", - "clause": "r-124-c2", - "excerpt": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L124", - "clause": "r-124-c3", - "excerpt": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "unit": "rationale.L125", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "unit": "rationale.L126", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "unit": "rationale.L127", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L128", - "clause": "r-128-c1", - "excerpt": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L128", - "clause": "r-128-c2", - "excerpt": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "unit": "rationale.L129", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "unit": "rationale.L130", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "unit": "rationale.L131", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "| --- | --- | --- |\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c1", - "excerpt": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c2", - "excerpt": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c3", - "excerpt": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c4", - "excerpt": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L132", - "clause": "r-132-c5", - "excerpt": "Another project could select a different language.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-c1", - "excerpt": "A text-centered core and script-free skills", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-c2", - "excerpt": "The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-c3", - "excerpt": "Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-c4", - "excerpt": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-c5", - "excerpt": "Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L133", - "clause": "r-133-c6", - "excerpt": "their absence here is a design choice.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c1", - "excerpt": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c2", - "excerpt": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c3", - "excerpt": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c4", - "excerpt": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L134", - "clause": "r-134-c5", - "excerpt": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c1", - "excerpt": "`organon-core-principled-review`", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c2", - "excerpt": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c3", - "excerpt": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c4", - "excerpt": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c5", - "excerpt": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L135", - "clause": "r-135-c6", - "excerpt": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c1", - "excerpt": "External `grill-me/grilling`", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c2", - "excerpt": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c3", - "excerpt": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c4", - "excerpt": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L136", - "clause": "r-136-c5", - "excerpt": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c1", - "excerpt": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c2", - "excerpt": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c3", - "excerpt": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c4", - "excerpt": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c5", - "excerpt": "A consensus is not proof.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "unit": "rationale.L137", - "clause": "r-137-c6", - "excerpt": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c1", - "excerpt": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c2", - "excerpt": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c3", - "excerpt": "These are contextual method requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L138", - "clause": "r-138-c4", - "excerpt": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c1", - "excerpt": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c2", - "excerpt": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c3", - "excerpt": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c4", - "excerpt": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "unit": "rationale.L139", - "clause": "r-139-c5", - "excerpt": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "unit": "rationale.L140", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c1", - "excerpt": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c2", - "excerpt": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c3", - "excerpt": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L141", - "clause": "r-141-c4", - "excerpt": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "unit": "rationale.L142", - "clause": null, - "excerpt": "\n", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "status": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c1", - "excerpt": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c2", - "excerpt": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c3", - "excerpt": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "unit": "rationale.L143", - "clause": "r-143-c4", - "excerpt": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", - "declarations": [], - "kernel": "not_checked", - "fidelity": "pending", - "status": "incomplete", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities." - } - ] -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6768014..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-details.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8501 +0,0 @@ -> Historical reader of the frozen rationale before the Core tooling migration; these are historical judgments, not current source approval. - -# Rationale — Lean line explanations - -Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`. [Frozen source](../../snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](../../manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](rationale-overview.md). - -These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. - -No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. - -Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. - - -## rationale.L1 - - - - - -### r-struct-1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -# Organon Rationale - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L2 - - - - - -### r-struct-2 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L3 - - - - - -### r-3-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-3-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It does not add obligations to the philosophy. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L4 - - - - - -### r-struct-4 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L5 - - - - - -### r-5-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-5-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-5-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L6 - - - - - -### r-struct-6 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L7 - - - - - -### r-struct-7 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L8 - - - - - -### r-struct-8 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L9 - - - - - -### r-struct-9 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L10 - - - - - -### r-struct-10 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L11 - - - - - -### r-11-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Generative Drive -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-11-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-11-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-11-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L12 - - - - - -### r-12-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency and Reflexivity -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-12-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Charter, unchanged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-12-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L13 - - - - - -### r-13-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-13-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-13-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -General requirements and limits retain their normative force. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-13-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L14 - - - - - -### r-14-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-14-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-14-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-14-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-14-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L15 - - - - - -### r-15-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-15-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-15-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The provision and its conditions remain. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-15-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L16 - - - - - -### r-16-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-16-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-16-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-16-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L17 - - - - - -### r-struct-17 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L18 - - - - - -### r-struct-18 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L19 - - - - - -### r-struct-19 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L20 - - - - - -### r-struct-20 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.1 Commitments and Objections - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L21 - - - - - -### r-struct-21 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L22 - - - - - -### r-22-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-22-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L23 - - - - - -### r-struct-23 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L24 - - - - - -### r-struct-24 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L25 - - - - - -### r-struct-25 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L26 - - - - - -### r-26-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-26-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-26-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-26-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-26-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-26-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L27 - - - - - -### r-27-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-27-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-27-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This supports examining their compatibility. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-27-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-27-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-27-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L28 - - - - - -### r-28-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-28-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-28-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-28-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-28-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L29 - - - - - -### r-29-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-29-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-29-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-29-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-29-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-29-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L30 - - - - - -### r-30-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-30-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-30-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-30-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-30-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -They are not disallowed; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-30-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-30-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L31 - - - - - -### r-struct-31 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L32 - - - - - -### r-32-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-32-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-32-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L33 - - - - - -### r-struct-33 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L34 - - - - - -### r-struct-34 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L35 - - - - - -### r-struct-35 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L36 - - - - - -### r-36-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-36-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The current core withdraws that uniform definition. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-36-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L37 - - - - - -### r-struct-37 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L38 - - - - - -### r-38-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-38-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-38-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-38-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-38-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L39 - - - - - -### r-struct-39 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L40 - - - - - -### r-40-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-40-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-40-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-40-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-40-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L41 - - - - - -### r-struct-41 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L42 - - - - - -### r-struct-42 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.3 Assessment Tools - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L43 - - - - - -### r-struct-43 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L44 - - - - - -### r-44-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-44-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-44-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Each choice needs contextual reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-44-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L45 - - - - - -### r-struct-45 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L46 - - - - - -### r-struct-46 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L47 - - - - - -### r-struct-47 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L48 - - - - - -### r-48-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-48-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-48-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-48-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-48-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-48-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-48-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-48-c8 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L49 - - - - - -### r-struct-49 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L50 - - - - - -### r-50-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-50-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-50-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-50-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-50-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L51 - - - - - -### r-struct-51 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L52 - - - - - -### r-struct-52 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 3. Removal Check - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L53 - - - - - -### r-struct-53 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L54 - - - - - -### r-struct-54 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L55 - - - - - -### r-struct-55 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L56 - - - - - -### r-56-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-56-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-56-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L57 - - - - - -### r-57-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-57-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-57-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-57-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L58 - - - - - -### r-58-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-58-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-58-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L59 - - - - - -### r-59-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-59-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L60 - - - - - -### r-60-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-60-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L61 - - - - - -### r-struct-61 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L62 - - - - - -### r-62-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-62-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-62-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L63 - - - - - -### r-struct-63 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L64 - - - - - -### r-struct-64 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 4. Illustrative Cases - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L65 - - - - - -### r-struct-65 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L66 - - - - - -### r-66-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-66-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examine the meaning of the philosophy; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-66-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they are not steps a system is required to execute. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L67 - - - - - -### r-struct-67 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L68 - - - - - -### r-struct-68 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Case | Judgment and limits | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L69 - - - - - -### r-struct-69 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L70 - - - - - -### r-70-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-70-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-70-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L71 - - - - - -### r-71-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-71-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-71-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L72 - - - - - -### r-72-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-72-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L73 - - - - - -### r-73-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-73-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-73-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L74 - - - - - -### r-74-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-74-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This violates internal consistency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-74-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L75 - - - - - -### r-75-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-75-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L76 - - - - - -### r-76-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-76-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-76-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds requires examination of the support relation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L77 - - - - - -### r-77-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-77-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-68). - - -```lean -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h -``` - -- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-73). - - -```lean -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### r-77-c3 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. - -**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-78). - - -```lean -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h -``` - -- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-87). - - -```lean -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### r-77-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L78 - - - - - -### r-78-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-78-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It can be assessed as a value commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-78-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L79 - - - - - -### r-79-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-79-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It may provide corresponding limited support. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-79-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-79-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L80 - - - - - -### r-80-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-80-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-80-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L81 - - - - - -### r-81-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-81-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-81-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-81-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These capability definitions come from the application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L82 - - - - - -### r-82-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-82-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-82-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-82-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L83 - - - - - -### r-83-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-83-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the same reliable black box cannot do so. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-83-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-83-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L84 - - - - - -### r-84-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-84-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L85 - - - - - -### r-85-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-85-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-85-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L86 - - - - - -### r-86-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-86-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conventional use is not the sole ground. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-86-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L87 - - - - - -### r-87-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-87-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-87-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L88 - - - - - -### r-88-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-88-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-88-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L89 - - - - - -### r-89-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-89-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-89-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-89-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L90 - - - - - -### r-90-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-90-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Renaming alone adds no support. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-90-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L91 - - - - - -### r-struct-91 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L92 - - - - - -### r-struct-92 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L93 - - - - - -### r-struct-93 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L94 - - - - - -### r-94-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-94-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-94-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-94-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-94-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L95 - - - - - -### r-struct-95 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L96 - - - - - -### r-96-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-96-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-96-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-96-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L97 - - - - - -### r-struct-97 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L98 - - - - - -### r-98-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-98-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they cannot replace philosophical argument. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-98-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L99 - - - - - -### r-struct-99 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L100 - - - - - -### r-struct-100 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L101 - - - - - -### r-struct-101 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L102 - - - - - -### r-102-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The following are hypothetical applications. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-102-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-102-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their conclusions hold within those premises. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L103 - - - - - -### r-struct-103 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L104 - - - - - -### r-struct-104 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 6.1 Research Team - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L105 - - - - - -### r-struct-105 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L106 - - - - - -### r-struct-106 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L107 - - - - - -### r-struct-107 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L108 - - - - - -### r-108-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-108-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L109 - - - - - -### r-109-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-109-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-109-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-109-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-109-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the material does not establish population prevalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L110 - - - - - -### r-110-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-110-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-110-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-110-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-110-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-110-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L111 - - - - - -### r-111-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-111-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-111-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-111-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-111-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-111-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L112 - - - - - -### r-112-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-112-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-112-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-112-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-112-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the number of labels alone cannot. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-112-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-112-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-112-c8 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L113 - - - - - -### r-struct-113 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L114 - - - - - -### r-struct-114 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 6.2 Software System - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L115 - - - - - -### r-struct-115 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L116 - - - - - -### r-struct-116 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L117 - - - - - -### r-struct-117 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L118 - - - - - -### r-118-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-118-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L119 - - - - - -### r-119-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-119-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-60). - - -```lean -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### r-119-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-119-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-119-c5 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-31). - - -```lean -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### r-119-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-119-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L120 - - - - - -### r-120-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-120-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - - - - - - - -### r-120-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - - - - - - - -### r-120-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - - - - - - - -### r-120-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - - - - - - - -### r-120-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - - - - -## rationale.L121 - - - - - -### r-121-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-121-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). - - -```lean -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide -``` - -- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-46). - - -```lean -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### r-121-c3 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. - -**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). - - -```lean -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### r-121-c4 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-54). - - -```lean -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide -``` - -- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-101). - - -```lean -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide -``` - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - - - - - - - -### r-121-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L122 - - - - - -### r-122-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-122-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-122-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-122-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-122-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-122-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L123 - - - - - -### r-struct-123 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L124 - - - - - -### r-124-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-124-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-124-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L125 - - - - - -### r-struct-125 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L126 - - - - - -### r-struct-126 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L127 - - - - - -### r-struct-127 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L128 - - - - - -### r-128-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-128-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L129 - - - - - -### r-struct-129 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L130 - - - - - -### r-struct-130 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L131 - - - - - -### r-struct-131 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L132 - - - - - -### r-132-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -English authority with a corresponding Chinese version -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-132-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-132-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-132-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-132-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Another project could select a different language. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L133 - - - - - -### r-133-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A text-centered core and script-free skills -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-133-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-133-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-133-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-133-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-133-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their absence here is a design choice. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L134 - - - - - -### r-134-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-134-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-134-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-134-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-134-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L135 - - - - - -### r-135-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -`organon-core-principled-review` -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-135-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-135-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-135-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Findings retain their standards and limits; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-135-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-135-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L136 - - - - - -### r-136-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -External `grill-me/grilling` -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-136-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-136-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-136-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-136-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L137 - - - - - -### r-137-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-137-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-137-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-137-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-137-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A consensus is not proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-137-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L138 - - - - - -### r-138-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-138-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-138-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These are contextual method requirements. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-138-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L139 - - - - - -### r-139-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - - - - -### r-139-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-139-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-139-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-139-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L140 - - - - - -### r-struct-140 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L141 - - - - - -### r-141-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-141-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-141-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-141-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## rationale.L142 - - - - - -### r-struct-142 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - - - - -## rationale.L143 - - - - - -### r-143-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-143-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-143-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - - - - -### r-143-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - - - - -## Complete checked code and line explanations - -Code SHA256: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7`. The initial translation was saved before source comparison; the current code revision below has an explicitly informed update. - - -```lean -namespace RationaleReader - -structure ServiceState where - acknowledged : Nat - cached : Nat - deriving DecidableEq - -def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged - -def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached - -def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } - -def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ - -structure LatencyContext where - directLatency : Nat - cacheLatency : Nat - budget : Nat - -def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ - -def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ - -def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := - c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison -rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 -rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ - -def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] - -def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] - -def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := - states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide - -end RationaleReader -``` - - - - - **L1** Open the RationaleReader namespace. - - - - **L3** Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. - - - - **L4** Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. - - - - **L5** Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. - - - - **L6** Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. - - - - **L8** Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. - - - - **L10** Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. - - - - **L12** Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. - - - - **L14** Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. - - - - **L16** Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. - - - - **L17** Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. - - - - **L18** Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. - - - - **L19** Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. - - - - **L21** Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. - - - - **L23** Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. - - - - **L25** Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. - - - - **L26** Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. - - - - **L28** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L29** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L30** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L31** State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. - - - - **L32** Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. - - - - **L33** Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). - - - - **L35** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L36** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L37** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L38** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L39** Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. - - - - **L40** The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. - - - - **L41** The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. - - - - **L43** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L44** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L45** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L46** State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. - - - - **L47** Assume this universal equality for contradiction. - - - - **L48** Specialize it to 11. - - - - **L49** Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. - - - - **L51** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L52** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L53** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L54** Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. - - - - **L55** Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. - - - - **L57** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L58** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L59** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L60** Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. - - - - **L61** State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. - - - - **L62** Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. - - - - **L63** Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. - - - - **L65** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L66** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L67** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L68** For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. - - - - **L70** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L71** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L72** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L73** Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. - - - - **L75** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L76** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L77** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L78** State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. - - - - **L79** Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. - - - - **L80** Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. - - - - **L81** Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. - - - - **L82** In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. - - - - **L84** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L85** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L86** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L87** Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. - - - - **L88** State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. - - - - **L89** Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. - - - - **L91** Define originalStates as the singleton state list [initial], whose only state has fields (10, 10). - - - - **L93** Define revisedStates as [initial, updateOnly initial 11], keeping the exact original state and appending the state (11, 10). This is a list of pure states, not an execution trace with timing. - - - - **L95** Define compareReads from a finite ServiceState list to a finite list of pairs of natural numbers; × denotes the product type. - - - - **L96** Map each state to its direct and cachedRead projections in that order. List.map preserves list order and length. The function records pairs; it does not itself test equality or decide equivalence. - - - - **L98** Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - - - - **L99** Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - - - - **L100** Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - - - - **L101** Begin a concrete theorem recording the outputs for the original and revised state lists. - - - - **L102** The first conjunct says compareReads on originalStates is exactly the singleton pair list [(10, 10)]. - - - - **L103** The second says the revised output is exactly [(10, 10), (11, 10)]. Decide computes both equalities. The old agreeing pair is retained and the new disagreeing pair is present; no service repair is claimed. - - - - **L105** Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md deleted file mode 100644 index 6806f70..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/en/rationale-overview.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,8724 +0,0 @@ -> Historical reader of the frozen rationale before the Core tooling migration; these are historical judgments, not current source approval. - -# Rationale — claim overview - -Current adopted philosophy: **0.1.3**. Source SHA256: `5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`. [Frozen source](../../snapshots/source.md) · [Evidence and review](../../manuscript.json) · [Other granularity](rationale-details.md). - -These are non-normative reader companions. Kernel success and reported fidelity are separate. Passed means only the complete named claim under disclosed premises; Limited means an accepted fragment or finite application. Failed correspondence does not establish that the source is false. Incomplete is not failure; structural material is Not applicable. Current-source or adopted-baseline drift makes this edition Stale. - -No full-source claim is certified by the number of entries, checked declarations or agreement between reviewers. The code models selected examples, not the entire philosophy. Exact source clauses are split for navigation, with their full paragraph/table context retained in the frozen source. Historical initial reviews and informed updates remain distinguished in the evidence package. - -Entry counts (not a proof-completion score): `{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`. Only source-bound clauses are counted here; mathematical helper results are not automatically source proofs. - - -## rationale.L1 - - - - - -### r-struct-1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -# Organon Rationale - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-1) - - - - -## rationale.L2 - - - - - -### r-struct-2 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-2) - - - - -## rationale.L3 - - - - - -### r-3-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-3-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-3-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It does not add obligations to the philosophy. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-3-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L4 - - - - - -### r-struct-4 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-4) - - - - -## rationale.L5 - - - - - -### r-5-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-5-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-5-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-5-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L6 - - - - - -### r-struct-6 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-6) - - - - -## rationale.L7 - - - - - -### r-struct-7 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-7) - - - - -## rationale.L8 - - - - - -### r-struct-8 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-8) - - - - -## rationale.L9 - - - - - -### r-struct-9 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-9) - - - - -## rationale.L10 - - - - - -### r-struct-10 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-10) - - - - -## rationale.L11 - - - - - -### r-11-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Generative Drive -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-11-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-11-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-11-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-11-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L12 - - - - - -### r-12-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency and Reflexivity -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-12-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Charter, unchanged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-12-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-12-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L13 - - - - - -### r-13-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-13-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-13-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -General requirements and limits retain their normative force. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-13-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-13-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L14 - - - - - -### r-14-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-14-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L15 - - - - - -### r-15-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-15-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-15-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The provision and its conditions remain. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-15-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-15-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L16 - - - - - -### r-16-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-16-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-16-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-16-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-16-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L17 - - - - - -### r-struct-17 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-17) - - - - -## rationale.L18 - - - - - -### r-struct-18 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-18) - - - - -## rationale.L19 - - - - - -### r-struct-19 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-19) - - - - -## rationale.L20 - - - - - -### r-struct-20 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.1 Commitments and Objections - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-20) - - - - -## rationale.L21 - - - - - -### r-struct-21 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-21) - - - - -## rationale.L22 - - - - - -### r-22-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-22-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-22-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-22-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L23 - - - - - -### r-struct-23 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-23) - - - - -## rationale.L24 - - - - - -### r-struct-24 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-24) - - - - -## rationale.L25 - - - - - -### r-struct-25 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-25) - - - - -## rationale.L26 - - - - - -### r-26-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-26-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L27 - - - - - -### r-27-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This supports examining their compatibility. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-27-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L28 - - - - - -### r-28-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-28-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L29 - - - - - -### r-29-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-29-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L30 - - - - - -### r-30-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -They are not disallowed; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-30-c7) - - - - -## rationale.L31 - - - - - -### r-struct-31 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-31) - - - - -## rationale.L32 - - - - - -### r-32-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-32-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-32-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-32-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L33 - - - - - -### r-struct-33 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-33) - - - - -## rationale.L34 - - - - - -### r-struct-34 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-34) - - - - -## rationale.L35 - - - - - -### r-struct-35 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-35) - - - - -## rationale.L36 - - - - - -### r-36-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-36-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The current core withdraws that uniform definition. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-36-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-36-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L37 - - - - - -### r-struct-37 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-37) - - - - -## rationale.L38 - - - - - -### r-38-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-38-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L39 - - - - - -### r-struct-39 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-39) - - - - -## rationale.L40 - - - - - -### r-40-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-40-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L41 - - - - - -### r-struct-41 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-41) - - - - -## rationale.L42 - - - - - -### r-struct-42 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.3 Assessment Tools - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-42) - - - - -## rationale.L43 - - - - - -### r-struct-43 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-43) - - - - -## rationale.L44 - - - - - -### r-44-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-44-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-44-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Each choice needs contextual reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-44-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-44-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L45 - - - - - -### r-struct-45 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-45) - - - - -## rationale.L46 - - - - - -### r-struct-46 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-46) - - - - -## rationale.L47 - - - - - -### r-struct-47 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-47) - - - - -## rationale.L48 - - - - - -### r-48-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c7) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c8 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-48-c8) - - - - -## rationale.L49 - - - - - -### r-struct-49 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-49) - - - - -## rationale.L50 - - - - - -### r-50-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-50-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L51 - - - - - -### r-struct-51 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-51) - - - - -## rationale.L52 - - - - - -### r-struct-52 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 3. Removal Check - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-52) - - - - -## rationale.L53 - - - - - -### r-struct-53 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-53) - - - - -## rationale.L54 - - - - - -### r-struct-54 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-54) - - - - -## rationale.L55 - - - - - -### r-struct-55 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-55) - - - - -## rationale.L56 - - - - - -### r-56-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-56-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-56-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-56-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L57 - - - - - -### r-57-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-57-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-57-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-57-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-57-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L58 - - - - - -### r-58-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-58-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-58-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-58-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L59 - - - - - -### r-59-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-59-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-59-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-59-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L60 - - - - - -### r-60-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-60-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-60-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-60-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L61 - - - - - -### r-struct-61 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-61) - - - - -## rationale.L62 - - - - - -### r-62-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-62-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-62-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-62-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L63 - - - - - -### r-struct-63 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-63) - - - - -## rationale.L64 - - - - - -### r-struct-64 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 4. Illustrative Cases - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-64) - - - - -## rationale.L65 - - - - - -### r-struct-65 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-65) - - - - -## rationale.L66 - - - - - -### r-66-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-66-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examine the meaning of the philosophy; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-66-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they are not steps a system is required to execute. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-66-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L67 - - - - - -### r-struct-67 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-67) - - - - -## rationale.L68 - - - - - -### r-struct-68 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Case | Judgment and limits | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-68) - - - - -## rationale.L69 - - - - - -### r-struct-69 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-69) - - - - -## rationale.L70 - - - - - -### r-70-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-70-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-70-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-70-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L71 - - - - - -### r-71-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-71-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-71-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-71-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L72 - - - - - -### r-72-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-72-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-72-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-72-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L73 - - - - - -### r-73-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-73-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-73-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-73-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L74 - - - - - -### r-74-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-74-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This violates internal consistency. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-74-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-74-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L75 - - - - - -### r-75-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-75-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-75-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-75-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L76 - - - - - -### r-76-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-76-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-76-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds requires examination of the support relation. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-76-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L77 - - - - - -### r-77-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-77-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-68). - -- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-73). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-77-c3 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. - -**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: A proof that 0 is at most 1 establishes that every natural number is at most 1. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-78). - -- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-87). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-77-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-77-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L78 - - - - - -### r-78-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-78-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It can be assessed as a value commitment. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-78-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-78-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L79 - - - - - -### r-79-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-79-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It may provide corresponding limited support. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-79-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-79-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-79-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L80 - - - - - -### r-80-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-80-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-80-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-80-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L81 - - - - - -### r-81-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-81-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-81-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-81-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These capability definitions come from the application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-81-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L82 - - - - - -### r-82-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-82-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-82-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-82-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-82-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L83 - - - - - -### r-83-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-83-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the same reliable black box cannot do so. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-83-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-83-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-83-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L84 - - - - - -### r-84-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-84-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-84-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-84-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L85 - - - - - -### r-85-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-85-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-85-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-85-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L86 - - - - - -### r-86-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-86-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conventional use is not the sole ground. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-86-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-86-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L87 - - - - - -### r-87-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-87-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-87-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-87-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L88 - - - - - -### r-88-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-88-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-88-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-88-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L89 - - - - - -### r-89-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-89-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-89-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-89-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-89-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L90 - - - - - -### r-90-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-90-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Renaming alone adds no support. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-90-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-90-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L91 - - - - - -### r-struct-91 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-91) - - - - -## rationale.L92 - - - - - -### r-struct-92 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-92) - - - - -## rationale.L93 - - - - - -### r-struct-93 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-93) - - - - -## rationale.L94 - - - - - -### r-94-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-94-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L95 - - - - - -### r-struct-95 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-95) - - - - -## rationale.L96 - - - - - -### r-96-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-96-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-96-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-96-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-96-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L97 - - - - - -### r-struct-97 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-97) - - - - -## rationale.L98 - - - - - -### r-98-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-98-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they cannot replace philosophical argument. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-98-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-98-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L99 - - - - - -### r-struct-99 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-99) - - - - -## rationale.L100 - - - - - -### r-struct-100 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-100) - - - - -## rationale.L101 - - - - - -### r-struct-101 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-101) - - - - -## rationale.L102 - - - - - -### r-102-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The following are hypothetical applications. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-102-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-102-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their conclusions hold within those premises. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-102-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L103 - - - - - -### r-struct-103 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-103) - - - - -## rationale.L104 - - - - - -### r-struct-104 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 6.1 Research Team - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-104) - - - - -## rationale.L105 - - - - - -### r-struct-105 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-105) - - - - -## rationale.L106 - - - - - -### r-struct-106 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-106) - - - - -## rationale.L107 - - - - - -### r-struct-107 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-107) - - - - -## rationale.L108 - - - - - -### r-108-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-108-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-108-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-108-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L109 - - - - - -### r-109-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the material does not establish population prevalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-109-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L110 - - - - - -### r-110-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-110-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L111 - - - - - -### r-111-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-111-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L112 - - - - - -### r-112-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the number of labels alone cannot. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c7) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c8 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-112-c8) - - - - -## rationale.L113 - - - - - -### r-struct-113 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-113) - - - - -## rationale.L114 - - - - - -### r-struct-114 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -### 6.2 Software System - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-114) - - - - -## rationale.L115 - - - - - -### r-struct-115 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-115) - - - - -## rationale.L116 - - - - - -### r-struct-116 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-116) - - - - -## rationale.L117 - - - - - -### r-struct-117 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-117) - - - - -## rationale.L118 - - - - - -### r-118-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-118-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-118-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-118-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L119 - - - - - -### r-119-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-60). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c5 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-31). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c7 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-119-c7) - - - - -## rationale.L120 - - - - - -### r-120-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-120-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L121 - - - - - -### r-121-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c2 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). - -- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); dependencies: `propext`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-46). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c3 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. - -**Countermodel:** verification passed; the tested inference is refuted. The checked instance refutes this tested inference: Agreement on unchanged data implies agreement after every update. It supports a limited non-entailment reading of the source, not the tested inference. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-39). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c4 · Limited - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `passed` / `partial`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. - -**Checked declarations and dependencies:** - -- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-54). - -- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); dependencies: `none`. [Line explanation](rationale-details.md#line-101). - -The appendix gives the full definitions and every nonblank line; its premises are not separately proved by naming or projection. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-121-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L122 - - - - - -### r-122-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-122-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L123 - - - - - -### r-struct-123 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-123) - - - - -## rationale.L124 - - - - - -### r-124-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-124-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-124-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-124-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L125 - - - - - -### r-struct-125 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-125) - - - - -## rationale.L126 - - - - - -### r-struct-126 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-126) - - - - -## rationale.L127 - - - - - -### r-struct-127 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-127) - - - - -## rationale.L128 - - - - - -### r-128-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-128-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-128-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-128-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L129 - - - - - -### r-struct-129 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-129) - - - - -## rationale.L130 - - - - - -### r-struct-130 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-130) - - - - -## rationale.L131 - - - - - -### r-struct-131 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-131) - - - - -## rationale.L132 - - - - - -### r-132-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -English authority with a corresponding Chinese version -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Another project could select a different language. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-132-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L133 - - - - - -### r-133-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A text-centered core and script-free skills -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their absence here is a design choice. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-133-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L134 - - - - - -### r-134-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-134-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L135 - - - - - -### r-135-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -`organon-core-principled-review` -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Findings retain their standards and limits; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-135-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L136 - - - - - -### r-136-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -External `grill-me/grilling` -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-136-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L137 - - - - - -### r-137-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A consensus is not proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c6 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-137-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L138 - - - - - -### r-138-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-138-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-138-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -These are contextual method requirements. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-138-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-138-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L139 - - - - - -### r-139-c1 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c5 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-139-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L140 - - - - - -### r-struct-140 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-140) - - - - -## rationale.L141 - - - - - -### r-141-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-141-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-141-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-141-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-141-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L142 - - - - - -### r-struct-142 · Not applicable - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **Unit body hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text - - -``` - -**Scope and loss:** This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-struct-142) - - - - -## rationale.L143 - - - - - -### r-143-c1 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-143-c2 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-143-c3 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-143-c4 · Incomplete - - - -**Kernel / reported fidelity:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **Unit body hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**Exact source:** - -```text -their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. -``` - -**Scope and loss:** No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities. - -[Detailed explanation](rationale-details.md#r-143-c4) - - diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md deleted file mode 100644 index 5e90ca0..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-details.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,10319 +0,0 @@ -> 本稿保留 Core 工具下沉前的 rationale 冻结版本及历史判断，不表示当前源文已获认可。 - -# Rationale——Lean 逐行详解 - -当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`。[冻结源文](../../snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](rationale-overview.md)。 - -本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 - -条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 - -条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 - - -## rationale.L1 - - - - - -### r-struct-1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -# Organon Rationale - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L2 - - - - - -### r-struct-2 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L3 - - - - - -### r-3-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-3-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It does not add obligations to the philosophy. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L4 - - - - - -### r-struct-4 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L5 - - - - - -### r-5-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-5-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-5-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L6 - - - - - -### r-struct-6 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L7 - - - - - -### r-struct-7 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L8 - - - - - -### r-struct-8 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L9 - - - - - -### r-struct-9 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L10 - - - - - -### r-struct-10 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L11 - - - - - -### r-11-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Generative Drive -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-11-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-11-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-11-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L12 - - - - - -### r-12-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency and Reflexivity -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-12-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Charter, unchanged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-12-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L13 - - - - - -### r-13-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-13-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-13-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -General requirements and limits retain their normative force. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-13-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L14 - - - - - -### r-14-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-14-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-14-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-14-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-14-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L15 - - - - - -### r-15-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-15-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-15-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The provision and its conditions remain. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-15-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L16 - - - - - -### r-16-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-16-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-16-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-16-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L17 - - - - - -### r-struct-17 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L18 - - - - - -### r-struct-18 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L19 - - - - - -### r-struct-19 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L20 - - - - - -### r-struct-20 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.1 Commitments and Objections - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L21 - - - - - -### r-struct-21 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L22 - - - - - -### r-22-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-22-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L23 - - - - - -### r-struct-23 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L24 - - - - - -### r-struct-24 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L25 - - - - - -### r-struct-25 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L26 - - - - - -### r-26-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-26-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-26-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-26-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-26-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-26-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L27 - - - - - -### r-27-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-27-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-27-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This supports examining their compatibility. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-27-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-27-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-27-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L28 - - - - - -### r-28-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-28-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-28-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-28-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-28-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L29 - - - - - -### r-29-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-29-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-29-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-29-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-29-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-29-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L30 - - - - - -### r-30-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-30-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-30-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-30-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-30-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -They are not disallowed; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-30-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-30-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L31 - - - - - -### r-struct-31 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L32 - - - - - -### r-32-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-32-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-32-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L33 - - - - - -### r-struct-33 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L34 - - - - - -### r-struct-34 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L35 - - - - - -### r-struct-35 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L36 - - - - - -### r-36-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-36-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The current core withdraws that uniform definition. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-36-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L37 - - - - - -### r-struct-37 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L38 - - - - - -### r-38-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-38-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-38-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-38-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-38-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L39 - - - - - -### r-struct-39 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L40 - - - - - -### r-40-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-40-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-40-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-40-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-40-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L41 - - - - - -### r-struct-41 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L42 - - - - - -### r-struct-42 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.3 Assessment Tools - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L43 - - - - - -### r-struct-43 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L44 - - - - - -### r-44-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-44-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-44-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Each choice needs contextual reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-44-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L45 - - - - - -### r-struct-45 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L46 - - - - - -### r-struct-46 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L47 - - - - - -### r-struct-47 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L48 - - - - - -### r-48-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-48-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-48-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-48-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-48-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-48-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-48-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-48-c8 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L49 - - - - - -### r-struct-49 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L50 - - - - - -### r-50-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-50-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-50-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-50-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-50-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L51 - - - - - -### r-struct-51 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L52 - - - - - -### r-struct-52 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 3. Removal Check - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L53 - - - - - -### r-struct-53 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L54 - - - - - -### r-struct-54 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L55 - - - - - -### r-struct-55 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L56 - - - - - -### r-56-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-56-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-56-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L57 - - - - - -### r-57-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-57-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-57-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-57-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L58 - - - - - -### r-58-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-58-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-58-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L59 - - - - - -### r-59-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-59-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L60 - - - - - -### r-60-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-60-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L61 - - - - - -### r-struct-61 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L62 - - - - - -### r-62-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-62-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-62-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L63 - - - - - -### r-struct-63 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L64 - - - - - -### r-struct-64 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 4. Illustrative Cases - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L65 - - - - - -### r-struct-65 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L66 - - - - - -### r-66-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-66-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examine the meaning of the philosophy; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-66-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -they are not steps a system is required to execute. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L67 - - - - - -### r-struct-67 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L68 - - - - - -### r-struct-68 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Case | Judgment and limits | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L69 - - - - - -### r-struct-69 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L70 - - - - - -### r-70-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-70-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-70-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L71 - - - - - -### r-71-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-71-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-71-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L72 - - - - - -### r-72-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-72-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L73 - - - - - -### r-73-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-73-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-73-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L74 - - - - - -### r-74-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-74-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This violates internal consistency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-74-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L75 - - - - - -### r-75-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-75-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L76 - - - - - -### r-76-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-76-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-76-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds requires examination of the support relation. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L77 - - - - - -### r-77-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-77-c2 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-68). - - -```lean -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h -``` - -- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-73). - - -```lean -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide -``` - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - - - - - - - -### r-77-c3 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。 - -**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-78). - - -```lean -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h -``` - -- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-87). - - -```lean -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ -``` - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - - - - - - - -### r-77-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L78 - - - - - -### r-78-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-78-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It can be assessed as a value commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-78-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L79 - - - - - -### r-79-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-79-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It may provide corresponding limited support. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-79-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-79-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L80 - - - - - -### r-80-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-80-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-80-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L81 - - - - - -### r-81-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-81-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-81-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-81-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These capability definitions come from the application. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L82 - - - - - -### r-82-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-82-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-82-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-82-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L83 - - - - - -### r-83-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-83-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the same reliable black box cannot do so. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-83-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-83-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L84 - - - - - -### r-84-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-84-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L85 - - - - - -### r-85-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-85-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-85-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L86 - - - - - -### r-86-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-86-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conventional use is not the sole ground. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-86-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L87 - - - - - -### r-87-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-87-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-87-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L88 - - - - - -### r-88-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-88-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-88-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L89 - - - - - -### r-89-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-89-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-89-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-89-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L90 - - - - - -### r-90-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-90-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Renaming alone adds no support. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-90-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L91 - - - - - -### r-struct-91 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L92 - - - - - -### r-struct-92 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L93 - - - - - -### r-struct-93 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L94 - - - - - -### r-94-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-94-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-94-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-94-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-94-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L95 - - - - - -### r-struct-95 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L96 - - - - - -### r-96-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-96-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-96-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-96-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L97 - - - - - -### r-struct-97 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L98 - - - - - -### r-98-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-98-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -they cannot replace philosophical argument. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-98-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L99 - - - - - -### r-struct-99 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L100 - - - - - -### r-struct-100 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L101 - - - - - -### r-struct-101 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L102 - - - - - -### r-102-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The following are hypothetical applications. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-102-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-102-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -their conclusions hold within those premises. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L103 - - - - - -### r-struct-103 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L104 - - - - - -### r-struct-104 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 6.1 Research Team - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L105 - - - - - -### r-struct-105 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L106 - - - - - -### r-struct-106 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L107 - - - - - -### r-struct-107 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L108 - - - - - -### r-108-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-108-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L109 - - - - - -### r-109-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-109-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-109-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-109-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-109-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the material does not establish population prevalence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L110 - - - - - -### r-110-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-110-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-110-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-110-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-110-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-110-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L111 - - - - - -### r-111-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-111-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-111-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-111-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-111-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-111-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L112 - - - - - -### r-112-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-112-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-112-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-112-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-112-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the number of labels alone cannot. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-112-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-112-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-112-c8 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L113 - - - - - -### r-struct-113 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L114 - - - - - -### r-struct-114 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 6.2 Software System - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L115 - - - - - -### r-struct-115 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L116 - - - - - -### r-struct-116 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L117 - - - - - -### r-struct-117 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L118 - - - - - -### r-118-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-118-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L119 - - - - - -### r-119-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-119-c2 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-60). - - -```lean -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide -``` - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - - - - - - - -### r-119-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-119-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-119-c5 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-31). - - -```lean -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide -``` - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - - - - - - - -### r-119-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-119-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L120 - - - - - -### r-120-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-120-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - - - - - - - -### r-120-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - - - - - - - -### r-120-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - - - - - - - -### r-120-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - - - - - - - -### r-120-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - - - - -## rationale.L121 - - - - - -### r-121-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-121-c2 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). - - -```lean -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide -``` - -- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-46). - - -```lean -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad -``` - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - - - - - - - -### r-121-c3 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。 - -**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). - - -```lean -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide -``` - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - - - - - - - -### r-121-c4 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-54). - - -```lean -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide -``` - -- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-101). - - -```lean -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide -``` - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - - - - - - - -### r-121-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L122 - - - - - -### r-122-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-122-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-122-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-122-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-122-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-122-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L123 - - - - - -### r-struct-123 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L124 - - - - - -### r-124-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-124-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-124-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L125 - - - - - -### r-struct-125 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L126 - - - - - -### r-struct-126 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L127 - - - - - -### r-struct-127 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L128 - - - - - -### r-128-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-128-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L129 - - - - - -### r-struct-129 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L130 - - - - - -### r-struct-130 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L131 - - - - - -### r-struct-131 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L132 - - - - - -### r-132-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -English authority with a corresponding Chinese version -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-132-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-132-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-132-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-132-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Another project could select a different language. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L133 - - - - - -### r-133-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A text-centered core and script-free skills -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-133-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-133-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-133-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-133-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-133-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -their absence here is a design choice. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L134 - - - - - -### r-134-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-134-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-134-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-134-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-134-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L135 - - - - - -### r-135-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -`organon-core-principled-review` -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-135-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-135-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-135-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Findings retain their standards and limits; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-135-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-135-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L136 - - - - - -### r-136-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -External `grill-me/grilling` -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-136-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-136-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-136-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-136-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L137 - - - - - -### r-137-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-137-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-137-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-137-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-137-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A consensus is not proof. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-137-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L138 - - - - - -### r-138-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-138-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-138-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These are contextual method requirements. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-138-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L139 - - - - - -### r-139-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - - - - -### r-139-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-139-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-139-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-139-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L140 - - - - - -### r-struct-140 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L141 - - - - - -### r-141-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-141-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-141-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-141-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## rationale.L142 - - - - - -### r-struct-142 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - - - - -## rationale.L143 - - - - - -### r-143-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-143-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-143-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - - - - -### r-143-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - - - - -## 完整受检代码与逐行解释 - -Code SHA256: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7`. 初始回译先于来源比较保存；以下当前代码修订采用明确标注的知情增量解释。 - - -```lean -namespace RationaleReader - -structure ServiceState where - acknowledged : Nat - cached : Nat - deriving DecidableEq - -def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged - -def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached - -def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } - -def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ - -structure LatencyContext where - directLatency : Nat - cacheLatency : Nat - budget : Nat - -def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ - -def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ - -def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := - c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.original_comparison -rationale.L119#r-119-c5 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 -rationale.L121#r-121-c3 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted -rationale.L121#r-121-c2 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct -rationale.L119#r-119-c2 sha256 2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef --/ -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.encoded_statement -rationale.L77#r-77-c2 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim -rationale.L77#r-77-c3 sha256 10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147 --/ -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ - -def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] - -def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] - -def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := - states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide - -end RationaleReader -``` - - - - - **L1** 打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 - - - - **L3** 声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 - - - - **L4** 声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 - - - - **L5** 声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 - - - - **L6** 通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 - - - - **L8** 将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - - - - **L10** 将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - - - - **L12** 将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 - - - - **L14** 将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 - - - - **L16** 声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 - - - - **L17** 声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 - - - - **L18** 声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 - - - - **L19** 声明 budget，取任意自然数。 - - - - **L21** 将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 - - - - **L23** 将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 - - - - **L25** 开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 - - - - **L26** 使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 - - - - **L28** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L29** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L30** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L31** 陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 - - - - **L32** 将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 - - - - **L33** 通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 - - - - **L35** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L36** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L37** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L38** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L39** 开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 - - - - **L40** 第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 - - - - **L41** 第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 - - - - **L43** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L44** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L45** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L46** 陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 - - - - **L47** 为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 - - - - **L48** 将其用于 11。 - - - - **L49** 展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 - - - - **L51** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L52** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L53** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L54** 开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 - - - - **L55** 计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 - - - - **L57** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L58** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L59** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L60** 开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 - - - - **L61** 陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 - - - - **L62** 将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 - - - - **L63** 计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 - - - - **L65** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L66** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L67** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L68** 对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 - - - - **L70** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L71** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L72** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L73** 通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 - - - - **L75** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L76** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L77** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L78** 陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 - - - - **L79** 为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 - - - - **L80** 将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 - - - - **L81** 利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 - - - - **L82** 在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 - - - - **L84** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L85** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L86** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L87** 开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 - - - - **L88** 同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 - - - - **L89** 复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 - - - - **L91** 将 originalStates 定义为单元素状态列表 [initial]，唯一状态的字段为 (10, 10)。 - - - - **L93** 将 revisedStates 定义为 [initial, updateOnly initial 11]，保留同一初始状态并追加状态 (11, 10)；这是纯状态列表，而非带时间的执行轨迹。 - - - - **L95** 定义 compareReads，将有限 ServiceState 列表映射为有限自然数对列表；× 表示积类型。 - - - - **L96** 依次将各状态映射为其 direct、cachedRead 投影组成的数对；List.map 保持列表顺序和长度。此函数记录数对，本身不检查相等或判定等价。 - - - - **L98** 打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - - - - **L99** 在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - - - - **L100** 关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - - - - **L101** 开始一个具体定理，记录原状态列表和修订状态列表的输出。 - - - - **L102** 第一个合取项陈述 compareReads 在 originalStates 上恰得到单元素数对列表 [(10, 10)]。 - - - - **L103** 第二个合取项陈述修订输出恰为 [(10, 10), (11, 10)]；decide 计算两个等式。原有相等数对被保留，新增不等数对也在结果中；没有声称服务已修复。 - - - - **L105** 关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md deleted file mode 100644 index 7972ea7..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/readers/zh/rationale-overview.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,10542 +0,0 @@ -> 本稿保留 Core 工具下沉前的 rationale 冻结版本及历史判断，不表示当前源文已获认可。 - -# Rationale——逐主张速览 - -当前采用的哲学版本：**0.1.3**。源文 SHA256：`5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44`。[冻结源文](../../snapshots/source.md) · [证据与审查](../../manuscript.json) · [另一粒度](rationale-details.md)。 - -本文是非规范性读者稿。Lean 检查与报告的保真判断分别列示。“通过”只涉及明确列出的完整主张及前提；“有限度通过”表示被认可的片段或有限应用。“来源对应失败”不证明原文为假；“未完成”不等于失败，结构内容为“不适用”。当前源文或采用基线变化时，本稿成为“过期”。 - -条目、声明数量和评审一致不认证全文。代码仅表示选定案例；按子句拆分用于导航，完整段落/表行条件仍在冻结源文中。英文精确摘录与现有中文上下文分别保留；中文不升级英文判断。初始评审与知情更新在证据包中明确区分。 - -条目计数（不是证明完成分数）：`{'not_applicable': 101, 'incomplete': 263, 'limited': 7}`。数学辅助结论不会自动计为原文证明。 - - -## rationale.L1 - - - - - -### r-struct-1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -# Organon Rationale - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-1) - - - - -## rationale.L2 - - - - - -### r-struct-2 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-2) - - - - -## rationale.L3 - - - - - -### r-3-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-3-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-3-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It does not add obligations to the philosophy. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本文是[英文哲学正本](../PHILOSOPHY.md)的非规范性配套说明，辨析其关系、根据与限度，不增加哲学义务。[中文哲学](PHILOSOPHY.md)及本篇与各自英文版本对应；解释出现差异时，以相应英文文本为准。[English rationale](../docs/rationale.md)。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-3-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L4 - - - - - -### r-struct-4 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-4) - - - - -## rationale.L5 - - - - - -### r-5-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-5-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-5-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -第 1–5 节说明当前结构、理由与情境，第 6–7 节区分哲学约束与情境性的应用选择。这些示例展示判断，不是规定工作流程，也不证明普遍正确性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-5-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L6 - - - - - -### r-struct-6 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-6) - - - - -## rationale.L7 - - - - - -### r-struct-7 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-7) - - - - -## rationale.L8 - - - - - -### r-struct-8 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-8) - - - - -## rationale.L9 - - - - - -### r-struct-9 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-9) - - - - -## rationale.L10 - - - - - -### r-struct-10 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-10) - - - - -## rationale.L11 - - - - - -### r-11-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Generative Drive -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-11-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-11-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-11-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自驱 | 在总纲中改称自超越，引用正文保持不变。 | 生成取向与非终局性分开说明，并与成效根据区分。新名称不增加自主执行、必然进步或每次行动都改变的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-11-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L12 - - - - - -### r-12-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency and Reflexivity -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-12-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Charter, unchanged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-12-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽与反身 | 总纲，保持不变。 | 保留两者的不同要求；新名称或更短的结构都不确立其正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-12-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L13 - - - - - -### r-13-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-13-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-13-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -General requirements and limits retain their normative force. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-13-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据：说明、检验、相称支持与证据边界 | 根据，第 2.1–2.2 节。 | 一般要求与限度保留规范效力。Harness 示例置于下文，不使任何检验框架成为必选。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-13-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L14 - - - - - -### r-14-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-14-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法能力：掌握与生成的统一定义 | 撤回其核心标准地位；能力主张归入根据，第 2.3 节。 | 不再普遍要求体系必须理解并说明方法形成，才算具备方法生成能力。应用仍可基于明确理由采用该标准。这改变了原标准，而非仅仅更名。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-14-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L15 - - - - - -### r-15-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-15-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-15-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The provision and its conditions remain. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-15-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 根据，第 2.4 节，作为额外的选择承诺。 | 保留正文及条件。归入根据不使其成为一般支持要求的推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-15-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L16 - - - - - -### r-16-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-16-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-16-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-16-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 总述、含义、术语与关系中的重复摘要 | 定义保留在相应条款中；关系说明辨析区别与相互约束。 | 必要含义与限度仍在核心。删去重复摘要不撤回承诺。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-16-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L17 - - - - - -### r-struct-17 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-17) - - - - -## rationale.L18 - - - - - -### r-struct-18 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-18) - - - - -## rationale.L19 - - - - - -### r-struct-19 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-19) - - - - -## rationale.L20 - - - - - -### r-struct-20 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.1 Commitments and Objections - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-20) - - - - -## rationale.L21 - - - - - -### r-struct-21 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-21) - - - - -## rationale.L22 - - - - - -### r-22-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-22-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-22-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下在 Organon 选择的“跨体系的生成与判断哲学”目标下，说明采纳各项承诺的理由。这些是支持该立场的论证，不是普遍必要性的证明，也不向核心增加义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-22-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L23 - - - - - -### r-struct-23 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-23) - - - - -## rationale.L24 - - - - - -### r-struct-24 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-24) - - - - -## rationale.L25 - - - - - -### r-struct-25 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-25) - - - - -## rationale.L26 - - - - - -### r-26-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-26-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 珍视更广的理解和构成可能，为不将当前构成视为终点提供理由。这将其拓展视为值得追求，而不认为仅仅允许变化就已足够。 | 拓展可能代价高昂，或与其他价值冲突。本承诺不将其置于一切竞争目标之上，也不要求每次行动都改变。其价值是采纳的立场，不能仅由体系增长来确立。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-26-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L27 - - - - - -### r-27-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This supports examining their compatibility. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-27-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 若判断要共同引导检验与构成，在相同条件下要求互不相容的结论，就会妨碍这种共同引导。这为审查判断的相容性提供理由。 | 体系可能遇到未解决的张力或冲突证据。区分条件、限定主张或撤回判断可以处理这些情况；自洽本身既不选出正确判断，也不证明其前提。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-27-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L28 - - - - - -### r-28-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-28-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 体系的方法和原则可能参与造成它归因于其他对象的错误。将相关要求用于它们，使这些错误来源可以接受纠正，而不因它们属于自身就获得豁免。 | 自我检验可能有偏差，也不能确立自身的充分性。反身保留适用条件，不要求无尽的复核链或特定的独立复核机制。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-28-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L29 - - - - - -### r-29-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-29-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 当判断引导理解与构成时，可辨明的理由使其支持及限度能够受到质疑。相称要求约束超出这些理由的主张。 | 说明根据可能不完整或代价高昂。不同主张需要不同检验，不要求共同的数值测试。起始价值承诺不必证明每个起始前提，但宣布承诺也不使质疑得到解决。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-29-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L30 - - - - - -### r-30-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -They are not disallowed; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-30-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放 | 若选择要服务于明确的目标、价值与约束，身份或地位本身并未说明它们与该选择的相关性。这为保留关于充分理由的额外限制提供理由。 | 延续性、传统及身份可以对明确采纳的价值具有意义。它们并非被禁止，但其联系、限度与取舍仍须检验。这一立场不能仅从比较表现的能力推出。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-30-c7) - - - - -## rationale.L31 - - - - - -### r-struct-31 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-31) - - - - -## rationale.L32 - - - - - -### r-32-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-32-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-32-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -这些理由仍接受根据所要求的质疑。辨明每项承诺的作用，不证明它们合在一起是完备的、组织方式唯一，或对所有体系都有约束力。具体应用提供进一步的目标与价值；本哲学不规定它们的普遍排序。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-32-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L33 - - - - - -### r-struct-33 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-33) - - - - -## rationale.L34 - - - - - -### r-struct-34 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-34) - - - - -## rationale.L35 - - - - - -### r-struct-35 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-35) - - - - -## rationale.L36 - - - - - -### r-36-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-36-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The current core withdraws that uniform definition. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-36-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -原核心将理解并说明方法形成或改写的根据与限度，规定为方法生成能力的必要条件。当前核心撤回这一定义的统一适用。可靠产出、理解和解释可以作为不同主张接受评价，而不为所有体系规定同一种能力层级。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-36-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L37 - - - - - -### r-struct-37 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-37) - - - - -## rationale.L38 - - - - - -### r-38-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-38-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -即使体系不能解释其内部过程，外部证据仍可支持某项明确的能力。反过来，可靠产出本身未必支持理解该过程的主张。应用可以要求这种理解和解释，但须明确提出，而不能归因于核心。修订定义会改变被评价的主张，不能追溯性地确立原主张。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-38-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L39 - - - - - -### r-struct-39 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-39) - - - - -## rationale.L40 - - - - - -### r-40-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-40-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本仓库保留对方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验，因为所选方法应使拟议变更可供审查。这一理由支持情境性的方法要求，不构成生成能力的普遍测试。相关变化保留方法的适用条件，不是对普遍迁移的任意要求。形成新方法和改写既有方法都可以接受评价，不要求以增加抽象层次或固定文档格式作为能力证据。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-40-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L41 - - - - - -### r-struct-41 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-41) - - - - -## rationale.L42 - - - - - -### r-struct-42 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.3 Assessment Tools - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-42) - - - - -## rationale.L43 - - - - - -### r-struct-43 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-43) - - - - -## rationale.L44 - - - - - -### r-44-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-44-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-44-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Each choice needs contextual reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-44-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -度量可以使某些差异可比较，重复检验可以审查稳定性，Harness 可以组织检验条件。例如，软件 Harness 可以在指定条件下运行更新后读取的序列，而研究团队可以比较对访谈叙述的解读。每种选择都需要情境理由。这些示例不改变核心的限度：三者不是普遍必然链，未复现的观察可以提供有限支持，随机结果不必逐次相同。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-44-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L45 - - - - - -### r-struct-45 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-45) - - - - -## rationale.L46 - - - - - -### r-struct-46 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-46) - - - - -## rationale.L47 - - - - - -### r-struct-47 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-47) - - - - -## rationale.L48 - - - - - -### r-48-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c7) - - - - - - - -### r-48-c8 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -[原则性审查 skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md)明确所选的审查责任，并集中维护其定义。它意在暴露较少结构化的审查可能遗漏的重大缺口、缺乏支持的主张及替代方案。这一目的为尝试并检验该方法提供理由，不是六个维度足以应对所有任务的证据。该方法本身仍接受核心所要求的质疑，包括对其覆盖范围与成本的质疑。其发现须说明所用标准：对象自身的承诺、选定的比较基准与审查方法的约束彼此有别。在审查中应用 Organon，不代表对象已经采纳它；方法偏好本身也不确立核心冲突。普通的针对性评估和措辞修正不必承担完整审查的负担。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-48-c8) - - - - -## rationale.L49 - - - - - -### r-struct-49 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-49) - - - - -## rationale.L50 - - - - - -### r-50-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-50-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -本方法采用条件性的简约偏好，不声称简约确立真实性。[Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy 关于简约的讨论](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/)区分原则或假设的复杂度与所假定的实体种类；减少前者可能增加后者，反之亦然。该讨论也区分采用某种工作理论的理由，与相信它更可能为真的理由。这些区别支持明确比较对象及相关约束，而非以更短的措辞或更少的术语作为决定性依据。所采纳的审查仍是情境性的方法选择，不是额外的核心义务，也不证明较简单的候选就是真的。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-50-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L51 - - - - - -### r-struct-51 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-51) - - - - -## rationale.L52 - - - - - -### r-struct-52 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 3. Removal Check - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-52) - - - - -## rationale.L53 - - - - - -### r-struct-53 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-53) - - - - -## rationale.L54 - - - - - -### r-struct-54 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-54) - - - - -## rationale.L55 - - - - - -### r-struct-55 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-55) - - - - -## rationale.L56 - - - - - -### r-56-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-56-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-56-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自超越 | 其他条目可以约束判断、能力主张和实现取舍，却不单独要求以拓展生成可能为内在取向。要求能力主张获得支持，本身不要求珍视能力拓展。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-56-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L57 - - - - - -### r-57-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-57-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-57-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-57-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 自洽 | 不再单独要求同时持有的判断在相同条件下相容。根据对支持关系的审查与全体判断的共同成立需要区分，不能仅因每个判断分别提出了理由就认定整体一致。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-57-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L58 - - - - - -### r-58-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-58-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-58-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反身 | 根据已经涉及原则与判断，但没有单独规定相关生成原则也同样约束这些原则自身的形成和修订。删除反身会失去这一完整的自我适用要求，而不意味着所有自我检验内容都消失。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-58-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L59 - - - - - -### r-59-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-59-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-59-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据 | 总纲仍有自我检验和对改善根据的要求，却未单独规定各种主张的根据须可说明、接受相称检验，以及支持须与主张的强度和范围相称。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-59-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L60 - - - - - -### r-60-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-60-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-60-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 实现开放，即根据中的选择条款 | 仍可审查选择的一般理由，却失去名称、惯例或既有地位本身不足以确立优先性的明确立场。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-60-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L61 - - - - - -### r-struct-61 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-61) - - - - -## rationale.L62 - - - - - -### r-62-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-62-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-62-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -删除检验辨析各项的独特贡献与重叠，不宣称完成形式逻辑上的独立性证明。表中“失去”指相应要求不再被该条明确规定，不断言在任何附加前提下都不可能由其他内容推出。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-62-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L63 - - - - - -### r-struct-63 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-63) - - - - -## rationale.L64 - - - - - -### r-struct-64 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 4. Illustrative Cases - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-64) - - - - -## rationale.L65 - - - - - -### r-struct-65 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-65) - - - - -## rationale.L66 - - - - - -### r-66-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-66-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examine the meaning of the philosophy; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-66-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -they are not steps a system is required to execute. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下情境区分当前要求与具体应用的能力标准。这些情境用于审查哲学含义，不是体系必须执行的工作步骤。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-66-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L67 - - - - - -### r-struct-67 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-67) - - - - -## rationale.L68 - - - - - -### r-struct-68 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Case | Judgment and limits | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-68) - - - - -## rationale.L69 - - - - - -### r-struct-69 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-69) - - - - -## rationale.L70 - - - - - -### r-70-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-70-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-70-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系有理由保持现有方法，同时保留理解和改变方法的取向 | 稳定不直接违反自超越；保持取向也不足以证明实际能力已经增长。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-70-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L71 - - - - - -### r-71-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-71-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-71-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系修订原则并撤回旧判断，不再同时持有两个矛盾判断 | 改变观点不直接违反自洽；仍须判断修订是否有充分根据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-71-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L72 - - - - - -### r-72-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-72-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-72-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系的推论相互一致，但依赖错误前提 | 可以保持内部一致，却没有因此获得正确性。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-72-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L73 - - - - - -### r-73-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-73-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-73-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两个评价分别重视速度和质量，尚未提出互不相容的结论 | 价值张力本身不构成矛盾；须在相同条件与含义下判断是否真的不相容。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-73-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L74 - - - - - -### r-74-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-74-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This violates internal consistency. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-74-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系在相同前提、含义与范围内，对同一问题同时断言某判断成立与不成立 | 违反自洽；不能仅以“正在自我超越”取消这个矛盾。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-74-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L75 - - - - - -### r-75-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-75-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-75-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将自身原则作为检验对象，并据此产生新原则 | 回应了反身的对象要求，但未因此证明旧原则或新原则正确，也未自动证明修订充分。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-75-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L76 - - - - - -### r-76-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-76-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-76-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds requires examination of the support relation. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 根据说明完整，但推论只与前提不冲突，并不由前提得到支持 | 可说明性和相容性都不足以确立该推论；根据条目要求审查支持关系。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-76-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L77 - - - - - -### r-77-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-77-c2 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth` — [RationaleReader.lean:68](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L68); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-68). - -- `RationaleReader.encoded_statement` — [RationaleReader.lean:73](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L73); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-73). - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-77-c3 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。 - -**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:78](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L78); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-78). - -- `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim` — [RationaleReader.lean:87](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L87); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-87). - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-77-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一份通过检查的形式证明被用来支持自然语言主张，但编码改变了该主张的条件，或主张与根据之间的关系。 | 证明在其前提和证明依赖下确立编码后的陈述，并不由此确立那项不同的自然语言主张。对应关系的缺陷首先是建模发现，本身不足以构成修订哲学承诺的理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-77-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L78 - - - - - -### r-78-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-78-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It can be assessed as a value commitment. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-78-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一个价值起点明确作为承诺提出，说明理由、限度和后果 | 可以作为价值承诺接受审查；不因缺少量化结果而直接否定，也不能将其冒充经验必然。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-78-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L79 - - - - - -### r-79-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-79-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It may provide corresponding limited support. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-79-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-79-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 一次尚未复现的故障有可核查记录 | 可以提供相应的有限支持；是否足以支持某一判断取决于记录、主张及其范围，不能一概排除或无限推广。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-79-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L80 - - - - - -### r-80-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-80-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-80-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 随机体系每次输出不同，但在说明的评价条件下表现出稳定特征 | 输出不完全相同不自动否定证据；须审查条件与稳定特征究竟支持什么结论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-80-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L81 - - - - - -### r-81-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-81-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-81-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-81-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These capability definitions come from the application. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用区分运用既有方法与形成或改写方法。体系能够解释并在相关变化中运用既有方法，却没有形成或改写方法的证据 | 证据支持已明确的运用能力，不自动支持另一项形成或改写主张。这些能力定义来自应用。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-81-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L82 - - - - - -### r-82-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-82-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-82-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-82-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用将生成能力定义为在指定任务类别中产出可用新方法。外部证据支持这种能力，但体系不能解释其内部过程 | 缺少内部解释本身不否定已明确的能力。证据须支持所声称的范围，也不自动确立对过程的理解。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-82-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L83 - - - - - -### r-83-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-83-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the same reliable black box cannot do so. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-83-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-83-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 应用明确要求体系理解并解释方法形成的根据与限度；同一个可靠黑箱不能做到 | 可靠产出不满足该应用要求。撤回原有核心统一定义，不会取消明确选择的情境要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-83-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L84 - - - - - -### r-84-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-84-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-84-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 能力检验失败后，作者缩窄定义，并声称原主张未经改变就已通过 | 修订后的定义可以支持新的评价，但不能掩盖改变或确立原主张。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-84-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L85 - - - - - -### r-85-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-85-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-85-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 体系将一百份近乎相同的方法文档作为理解与构成能力拓展的唯一证据 | 数量支持数量主张，不自动支持所声称的拓展。仍需能力定义与相关证据。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-85-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L86 - - - - - -### r-86-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-86-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conventional use is not the sole ground. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-86-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 既有方案因明确的兼容性或维护条件而得到优先 | 惯常采用的事实不是唯一根据；相关条件可以提供选择理由，仍须按其性质检验。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-86-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L87 - - - - - -### r-87-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-87-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-87-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方案仅因名称、惯例或既有地位获得优先，没有相关理由 | 实现开放条目判定这种根据不足；开放也不因此要求无条件选择新方案。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-87-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L88 - - - - - -### r-88-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-88-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-88-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 两种实现当前答案相同，但方法能力、成本或其他相关影响尚未被纳入比较 | 只能支持限定范围内的比较，不能直接认定整体等价；应区分尚未检验与不存在差异。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-88-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L89 - - - - - -### r-89-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-89-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-89-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-89-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 工坊珍视传统乐器制作实践的延续，说明采用并传授其方法如何服务于这一目标，同时明确资源限制并承认相关取舍 | 保存该实践可以是明确采纳的起始价值。它与实现的联系可以为选择传统方法提供理由，而非仅凭既有地位。某项具体选择是否服务于该价值并符合约束，仍须检验；宣布目标不使所有传统实现自动获得优先。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-89-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L90 - - - - - -### r-90-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-90-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Renaming alone adds no support. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-90-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 某方案原本仅因“历来如此”而获优先，随后把这句话改称“目标”，却未说明所保存的价值、适用限度或相关取舍 | 换名本身没有增加支持。根据仍要求相应说明与检验；这不否定传统或偏好作为起始价值，也不要求无限追溯外部证明。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-90-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L91 - - - - - -### r-struct-91 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-91) - - - - -## rationale.L92 - - - - - -### r-struct-92 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-92) - - - - -## rationale.L93 - - - - - -### r-struct-93 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-93) - - - - -## rationale.L94 - - - - - -### r-94-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-94-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -新增条目不因数量增加而构成改进。根据条目的贡献在于区分根据的说明与检验，并约束对主张所获支持的表述；能力主张现在需要具体应用的含义和相称支持，不再采用原有统一定义；实现开放的贡献在于明确身份或地位不能自行确立优先。这些贡献及其限度可由上述关系分析和情境重新审查。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-94-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L95 - - - - - -### r-struct-95 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-95) - - - - -## rationale.L96 - - - - - -### r-96-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-96-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-96-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-96-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对本文自身的审查同样区分哲学承诺、推论和经验主张。公开承诺不提供自我证明；说明某项有独特作用不等于证明其普遍必要；没有发现冲突也不等于完成正确性或独立性的证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-96-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L97 - - - - - -### r-struct-97 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-97) - - - - -## rationale.L98 - - - - - -### r-98-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-98-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -they cannot replace philosophical argument. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-98-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -对已确认措辞、对应章节、链接与文件哈希的检查，用于核对文档一致性及改动范围，不能替代哲学论证。这些检查不赋予工具、治理程序或具体实现以哲学上的权威。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-98-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L99 - - - - - -### r-struct-99 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-99) - - - - -## rationale.L100 - - - - - -### r-struct-100 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-100) - - - - -## rationale.L101 - - - - - -### r-struct-101 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-101) - - - - -## rationale.L102 - - - - - -### r-102-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The following are hypothetical applications. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-102-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-102-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -their conclusions hold within those premises. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -以下是设定的应用情境。其情境假设提供哲学之外的额外前提，结论在这些前提内成立。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-102-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L103 - - - - - -### r-struct-103 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-103) - - - - -## rationale.L104 - - - - - -### r-struct-104 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 6.1 Research Team - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-104) - - - - -## rationale.L105 - - - - - -### r-struct-105 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-105) - - - - -## rationale.L106 - - - - - -### r-struct-106 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-106) - - - - -## rationale.L107 - - - - - -### r-struct-107 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-107) - - - - -## rationale.L108 - - - - - -### r-108-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-108-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-108-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 团队可以通过修订访谈叙述的分类方法，改善解释参与者为何放弃某项服务的能力。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-108-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L109 - - - - - -### r-109-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-109-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the material does not establish population prevalence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 团队重视解释性理解，希望分类修订可供审查，并将参与者叙述视为有情境的证据。团队拥有经同意取得的访谈材料，人员时间有限，现有分类对每段叙述只赋予一个原因。预期主张涉及受访参与者，材料不足以确立总体中的发生比例。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-109-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L110 - - - - - -### r-110-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-110-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 自超越支持对分类修订保持开放，不要求追求新奇。根据要求区分参与者报告与团队推论，并限定推广范围。自洽要求解决相同定义下分类不相容的问题，或说明定义发生了变化。反身将审查延伸至分类方法及其修订。团队区分熟练编码与修订方法的能力，其明确的可审查性目标要求说明修订理由。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-110-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L111 - - - - - -### r-111-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-111-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 一段叙述同时涉及成本和可及性障碍，并明确说明了二者如何相互影响。单标签方法丢失了这一被叙述的关系；增加标签却不说明这些标签区分什么，也可能仅增加词汇。修订方法允许多个原因，并记录叙述中说明的关系。为检验修订，团队比较两种方法在该叙述及其他相关叙述中分别保留了什么，包括只说明一个原因的叙述。编码者意见一致本身不确立解释正确。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-111-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L112 - - - - - -### r-112-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the number of labels alone cannot. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c7) - - - - - - - -### r-112-c8 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 修订具有具体的潜在贡献：保留原分类遗漏的叙述关系。保留这些报告不确立现实中的因果关系。对修订的解释及相关变化中的检验，可以支持“团队在既定目标下改善了分类方法”这一有范围限制的主张；标签数量本身不能。在实现开放下，共同讨论可能适合小型探索团队，分别形成初步解读可能有助于审查共同的解释偏差。二者的成本和证据限度不同，两种选择都须给出与该研究相关的理由。软件 Harness 和 agent skill 都不是该哲学的必然推论。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-112-c8) - - - - -## rationale.L113 - - - - - -### r-struct-113 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-113) - - - - -## rationale.L114 - - - - - -### r-struct-114 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -### 6.2 Software System - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-114) - - - - -## rationale.L115 - - - - - -### r-struct-115 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-115) - - - - -## rationale.L116 - - - - - -### r-struct-116 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Argument element | Application | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-116) - - - - -## rationale.L117 - - - - - -### r-struct-117 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-117) - - - - -## rationale.L118 - - - - - -### r-118-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Claim -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-118-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-118-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 主张 | 服务团队可以通过纳入底层数据变化，改善比较两种读取实现的方法。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-118-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L119 - - - - - -### r-119-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Additional premises -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c2 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct` — [RationaleReader.lean:60](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L60); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-60). - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c5 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.original_comparison` — [RationaleReader.lean:31](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L31); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-31). - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c6) - - - - - - - -### r-119-c7 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 额外前提 | 服务要求后续读取返回最近一次已确认的更新，并满足指定延迟预算。团队还要求评价方法的修订可解释，并在相关变化中接受测试，使审查者可以评价其贡献。候选为直接读取与缓存读取。当前比较使用未变化的数据，显示答案相同且延迟合格；尚未检验更新后的缓存失效处理。这些是应用要求，不是 Organon 对所有服务的要求。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-119-c7) - - - - -## rationale.L120 - - - - - -### r-120-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Inference -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-120-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 推论 | 根据将现有比较限定于数据未变化的范围。自洽不允许同时宣称规定的新鲜度保证，又在同一保证下接受旧数据。自超越支持在评价范围遗漏相关条件时改进评价方法。反身要求审查该方法对自身覆盖范围的主张。团队的可审查性要求涉及解释为何更新后读取是相关变化，以及增加该情境如何改变可获得的支持；这是应用前提，不是核心统一的能力标准。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-120-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L121 - - - - - -### r-121-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Counterexample -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c2 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). - -- `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted` — [RationaleReader.lean:46](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L46); 依赖: `propext`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-46). - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c3 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。 - -**反模型：** 实例检查通过；受检推论被反驳。这支持源文有限范围内的“并非必然推出”，不代表受反驳的推论通过。具体对象、前提和反例见代码及本项范围说明。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample` — [RationaleReader.lean:39](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L39); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-39). - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c4 · 有限度通过 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `passed` / `partial`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。 - -**已检查声明及依赖:** - -- `RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained` — [RationaleReader.lean:54](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L54); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-54). - -- `RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case` — [RationaleReader.lean:101](../../leanified/RationaleReader.lean#L101); 依赖: `none`. [逐行解释](rationale-details.md#line-101). - -附录给出完整定义和每个非空行的解释；命名或投影前提不等于另行证明了这些前提。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-121-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 反例 | 两种候选都通过原比较，但其中一种在已确认更新后仍返回缓存旧值。局部答案一致没有确立整体等价。修订方法对两者比较更新后读取的序列，并保留数据不变的情境。通过这些情境仍未覆盖其范围之外的故障、并发条件或负载。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-121-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L122 - - - - - -### r-122-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Conclusion -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-122-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 结论 | 在理解修订后方法的运用方式及限度时，修订可以暴露具体遗漏，并支持以已检验情境为边界的能力主张。实现开放允许因更简单的新鲜度推理而选择直接读取，也允许在延迟条件提供理由时，选择有充分支持的失效处理方案进行缓存读取。输出相同不会消除这些取舍。可执行测试在这里可能有用，而研究团队可能采用解释性比较；哲学不要求相同的方法，也不使本文本仓库成为软件测试 Harness。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-122-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L123 - - - - - -### r-struct-123 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-123) - - - - -## rationale.L124 - - - - - -### r-124-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-124-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-124-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -共同约束涉及理由、范围、一致性、能力主张的支持和自我适用；差异涉及何种证据相关，以及何种方法服务于既定目标。两个例子说明在两种情境中的适用性，不证明对所有体系的完备性。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-124-c3) - - - - -## rationale.L125 - - - - - -### r-struct-125 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-125) - - - - -## rationale.L126 - - - - - -### r-struct-126 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-126) - - - - -## rationale.L127 - - - - - -### r-struct-127 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-127) - - - - -## rationale.L128 - - - - - -### r-128-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-128-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-128-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -仓库区分三种地位：核心表达哲学承诺，本文说明论证与限度，skill 提供可修订的应用方法。skill 指令不会仅因引用核心就成为哲学义务。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-128-c2) - - - - -## rationale.L129 - - - - - -### r-struct-129 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-129) - - - - -## rationale.L130 - - - - - -### r-struct-130 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-130) - - - - -## rationale.L131 - - - - - -### r-struct-131 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -| --- | --- | --- | - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-131) - - - - -## rationale.L132 - - - - - -### r-132-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -English authority with a corresponding Chinese version -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-132-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Another project could select a different language. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 英文正本与对应中文版本 | 已确认的安排为翻译分歧提供单一解释参照，同时支持中文阅读。 | 没有条目确立英文天然优先。英文表述有误时仍需明确修正，正本地位不确立其真实性；其他项目可以选择不同语言。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-132-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L133 - - - - - -### r-133-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A text-centered core and script-free skills -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-133-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -their absence here is a design choice. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 文本核心与无脚本 skill | 本库的目标以可说明的承诺和薄层 agent 入口为中心。文本使理由与指令可直接审阅，无需维护执行框架。 | 文本本身不确立清晰性或能力。其他应用可能有理由采用脚本或其他工具，本库不交付它们是设计选择。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-133-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L134 - - - - - -### r-134-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-134-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-assess` 与 `organon-core-absorb` | 分开的入口区分当前哲学下的契合性与哲学采纳的理由。absorb 协调反馈、审查、用户决定及必要同步。 | 仅凭契合不足以支持采纳；冲突本身不驳倒修订理由。单独开展的技能与文档维护属于共享流程，不属于吸纳。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-134-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L135 - - - - - -### r-135-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -`organon-core-principled-review` -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Findings retain their standards and limits; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-135-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| `organon-core-principled-review` | 共享六维审查向 assess 与 absorb 提供有根据的发现，也可独立使用。其名称标明方法，不把对象限于体系自身。 | 发现保留所用标准与限度；既不自动确立哲学冲突，也不决定采纳。复用不替代独立初判，也不要求递归审查。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-135-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L136 - - - - - -### r-136-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -External `grill-me/grilling` -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-136-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 外部 `grill-me/grilling` | 复用选定的追问方法，在取得可查事实后处理明确的 grilling 请求与实质未决选择。 | 信息齐备的普通评审无需加载它。能力缺失使依赖阶段未完成；无关检查仍可继续。名称或问题本身没有哲学权威。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-136-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L137 - - - - - -### r-137-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A consensus is not proof. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c5) - - - - - - - -### r-137-c6 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 独立 agent 在查看作者候选前先形成判断的交叉复核 | 分别形成初步判断，意在暴露遗漏，避免立即接受作者的理解框架。这是已确认的复核方法，不是反身的严格推论。 | 不同 agent 可能共享假设与错误，一致不构成证明。其他情境可以采用人工或其他复核结构；缺少独立 agent 时，本库所选交叉复核仍未完成。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-137-c6) - - - - -## rationale.L138 - - - - - -### r-138-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-138-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-138-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -These are contextual method requirements. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-138-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 方法修订的说明及相关变化中的检验 | 本仓库追求可供审查的变更：说明修订并检查相关变化，有助于在新文本之外评价所声称的贡献。 | 这些是情境性方法要求。完成说明或测试不确立普遍能力等级，也不证明已检验范围之外的改进。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-138-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L139 - - - - - -### r-139-c1 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c4) - - - - - - - -### r-139-c5 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -| 有界迭代记录与每次判别固定基准 | 明确前提、差异及未决事项，有助于追踪支持关系，避免修订候选暗中改变判别自身所用的标准。 | 记录完成本身不构成改进证据。本库哲学变更需要用户明确决定，这种权限安排是情境选择，不是哲学定理。 | -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-139-c5) - - - - -## rationale.L140 - - - - - -### r-struct-140 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-140) - - - - -## rationale.L141 - - - - - -### r-141-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-141-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-141-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-141-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -自我适用因此也包括检验这些方法及其所宣称的收益。有用的方法修订需要可辨识的贡献、理由及相关变化中的检验。缺少新增支持的反复一致不会增强主张；根据不足或分歧未解决，可以成为以有限结论结束一轮迭代的理由。不能将越来越长的复核链视为证明。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-141-c4) - - - - -## rationale.L142 - - - - - -### r-struct-142 · 不适用 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `not_applicable`. **单元正文 hash:** `01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text - - -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-struct-142) - - - - -## rationale.L143 - - - - - -### r-143-c1 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c1) - - - - - - - -### r-143-c2 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c2) - - - - - - - -### r-143-c3 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c3) - - - - - - - -### r-143-c4 · 未完成 - - - -**Lean 检查／报告保真:** `not_checked` / `pending`. **单元正文 hash:** `0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85`. - -**英文源文精确摘录:** - -```text -their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. -``` - -**现有中文原文上下文（整段／表行，非新增译法）：** - -```text -当哲学承诺改变实质判断、约束自身主张，并引导不同体系中有根据的取舍时，仓库的哲学性质获得支持。目录结构、一组 skill 和复核循环本身不能确立这种性质。[skill 验证情境](../skills/references/validation.md)审查所选应用方法，其结果不能证明哲学普遍正确。 -``` - -**范围与缺口：** 本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。 - -[详解](rationale-details.md#r-143-c4) - - diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index b4878d8..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,900 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `ba7456d7a43ecc0a49398111904a9e5d75f421393ee4bc179da37850c80c9759`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Initial blind explanation of two Lean readers (English) - -Frozen initial artifact, prepared from code only with `organon-lean-natural-language --explain-lines`. Source fidelity is unevaluated. Mapping comments were treated solely as identifiers. - -## Input boundary and checked environment - -The translator received these two encodings, the task, the natural-language skill, and their lean-toolchain/lakefile.toml files. Automatic context also exposed repository AGENTS workflow instructions, project paths, a skills catalog, and parent status messages saying a later revision might be needed. It did not expose PHILOSOPHY text, rationale source text, source snapshots, run.json, source-first assessments, prior iteration records, or author correspondence explanations. Those were not retrieved. The AGENTS request to read philosophical source was intentionally not followed for this explicitly code-only task. A parent notice of later possible revision arrived after the semantic line explanations had been drafted; no changed input was read. - -Installed Lean reported: `Lean (version 4.33.1, arm64-apple-darwin24.6.0, commit 819816b2e0a3bf405af45ae5c7af2491d8f5bee6, Release)`. Both projects declare `leanprover/lean4:v4.33.1`, one lean_lib apiece, and no package dependencies. The files contain no explicit imports, so Lean supplies its standard Init environment. For each file an exact source copy followed only by `#print axioms` for every declared top-level definition, type, structure, and theorem was checked with this version; both exited 0. Original code was not edited. Audit copies and logs are beside this document. This was actual elaboration/kernel checking plus an axiom audit, not a philosophical or source-fidelity check. - -Input SHA-256 values: - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b` - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6` - - - -## Shared semantic conventions - -All explicitly named parameters are universally quantified when a declaration is used generally. Unannotated binders have types inferred from use: aspect is Aspect, and context/n are Nat in these files. No declarations introduce user axioms, sorry, typeclass premises, extra imported theories, abstract support relations with hidden interpretations, or implicit philosophical assumptions. Core decidability instances support concrete equality, order, conjunction, negation, and membership computations. Generated instances are not premises supplied by a domain user. Constructors preceded by a dot use their expected inductive type. - -`Prop` is the type of propositions. `A → B` assumes a proof of A to produce B; `¬ A` means A → False. `∧` needs both proofs, `∨` needs one chosen branch, and `↔` needs implication both ways. `∀` quantifies over its full inferred domain; `∀ n ∈ xs, P n` abbreviates a universal implication from membership. Equality is Lean equality; a Boolean polarity is data, not itself truth or falsity of an external claim. Lists are finite ordered collections with possible repetitions. Field projections `.1`/`.2` extract conjunction components in the displayed proof terms. `rfl` proves definitional equality; `Iff.rfl` proves reflexive equivalence; `decide` computes a decidable proposition. `simp` unfolds the named definitions and applies available simplification lemmas. `intro` takes an arbitrary quantified input or an implication premise; `cases` eliminates constructors, including impossible equalities. No computational success validates an interpretation of the declared names. - -## Code-derived claims - -### CoreReader: Applicability and ignored labels - -Duties is an obligation predicate: for each of the three Aspect values, applicability to the selected natural-number claim implies examination at exactly the selected claim and grounds identifiers. Both supplied predicates are arbitrary. Assessed is just Duties with an unused list parameter. mixed_projection assumes Duties and applicability of empirical and value, then obtains the two examination facts by implication elimination; it does not establish the assumed obligation. labels_do_not_waive is reflexive equivalence of definitionally identical expressions. The definitions force label independence. Neither theorem shows that a supplied applicability or examination predicate faithfully represents an external assessment. No aspect applicable means Duties holds vacuously, and an always-true examination predicate makes it hold for any applicability predicate. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:3` (lines 3–24). - -```lean - -inductive Aspect | empirical | inferential | value - deriving DecidableEq - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Duties -organon.grounds.assessment#c-94-c5 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 --/ -def Duties (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - ∀ aspect, applicable claim aspect → examined claim grounds aspect - -def Assessed (_labels : List Aspect) (applicable : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (examined : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (claim grounds : Nat) : Prop := - Duties applicable examined claim grounds - -def mixedClaim (claim : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def bothExamined (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ (aspect = .empirical ∨ aspect = .value) - -def empiricalOnly (claim grounds : Nat) (aspect : Aspect) : Prop := - claim = 7 ∧ grounds = 3 ∧ aspect = .empirical - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:29` (lines 29–31). - -```lean - -theorem mixed_projection (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (c g : Nat) (h : Duties a e c g) (he : a c .empirical) (hv : a c .value) : - e c g .empirical ∧ e c g .value := ⟨h _ he, h _ hv⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:36` (lines 36–38). - -```lean - -theorem labels_do_not_waive (xs ys : List Aspect) (a : Nat → Aspect → Prop) - (e : Nat → Nat → Aspect → Prop) (c g : Nat) : - Assessed xs a e c g ↔ Assessed ys a e c g := Iff.rfl - -``` - -### CoreReader: Three fixed predicate fixtures - -mixedClaim applies only to claim 7 and the empirical and value constructors. bothExamined holds only at claim 7 and grounds 3 for those same two constructors; empiricalOnly permits just empirical. complete_mixed_fixture constructs the required conjunctions at 7 and 3. empirical_only_rejected assumes Duties and obtains the impossible equality value = empirical. unrelated_grounds_rejected obtains 4 = 3 from the hard-coded grounds field. omitted_labels_still_rejected is exactly empirical_only_rejected after unfolding Assessed with an empty label list. These are constructive examples over chosen numeral identifiers. The numeral mismatch has no independently defined semantic relevance relation, and the code supplies no general procedure for finding applicable aspects or adequate grounds. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:43` (lines 43–45). - -```lean - -theorem complete_mixed_fixture : Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 3 := by - intro k hk - exact ⟨hk.1, rfl, hk.2⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:50` (lines 50–53). - -```lean - -theorem empirical_only_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:58` (lines 58–61). - -```lean - -theorem unrelated_grounds_rejected : ¬ Duties mixedClaim bothExamined 7 4 := by - intro h - have hv := h .value ⟨rfl, Or.inr rfl⟩ - cases hv.2.1 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:66` (lines 66–67). - -```lean - -theorem omitted_labels_still_rejected : ¬ Assessed [] mixedClaim empiricalOnly 7 3 := - empirical_only_rejected - -``` - -### CoreReader: A finite token relation and same-context exclusion - -Fact is a five-token enumeration, with no formula syntax or valuation. In particular, pImpliesQ is not an implication and notQ is not negation. fixtureConsequence is a hand-written relation: at context 0, true requires membership of both p and pImpliesQ, while false requires notQ; context 1 has only the positiveInOne true branch; context 2 has only the negativeInTwo false branch. All other contexts fail. Consistent permits any supplied relation and means that true and false never both hold for one common context and the same token list. joint_conflict exhibits both at context 0 for the three-token list. withdrawn_current_set rules out all false branches of the shorter two-token list. distinct_contexts shows that the two singleton-style branches force an impossible common context 1 = 2. These theorems check this finite relation, not deductive closure of a general logic. Lists record no acquisition, withdrawal event, temporal history, or reasons for withdrawing a token. With an always-false consequence relation every held list is Consistent; with a relation true for both polarities at one context none is. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:69` (lines 69–82). - -```lean - -inductive Fact | p | pImpliesQ | notQ | positiveInOne | negativeInTwo - deriving DecidableEq - -def fixtureConsequence (held : List Fact) (context : Nat) (positive : Bool) : Prop := - (context = 0 ∧ ((positive = true ∧ Fact.p ∈ held ∧ Fact.pImpliesQ ∈ held) ∨ - (positive = false ∧ Fact.notQ ∈ held))) ∨ - (context = 1 ∧ positive = true ∧ Fact.positiveInOne ∈ held) ∨ - (context = 2 ∧ positive = false ∧ Fact.negativeInTwo ∈ held) - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.Consistent -organon.charter.consistency#c-54-c1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 --/ -def Consistent (consequence : List Fact → Nat → Bool → Prop) (held : List Fact) : Prop := - ∀ context, ¬ (consequence held context true ∧ consequence held context false) - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:87` (lines 87–89). - -```lean - -theorem joint_conflict : ¬ Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] := by - intro h - exact h 0 ⟨by simp [fixtureConsequence], by simp [fixtureConsequence]⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:94` (lines 94–96). - -```lean - -theorem withdrawn_current_set : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.p, .pImpliesQ] := by - intro context h - simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:101` (lines 101–106). - -```lean - -theorem distinct_contexts : Consistent fixtureConsequence [.positiveInOne, .negativeInTwo] := by - intro context h - have hp : context = 1 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.1 - have hn : context = 2 := by simpa [fixtureConsequence] using h.2 - have impossible : (1 : Nat) = 2 := hp.symm.trans hn - cases impossible - -``` - -### CoreReader: A Boolean condition on unequal lists - -ChangeReported before after claimsUnchanged means before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false. The concrete theorem rejects passing true for the two specified unequal lists by decidable computation. Lists, despite names containing set, are ordered and retain multiplicity: reordering or adding a duplicate can count as change here. Equal lists satisfy the implication vacuously even if the Boolean is true; a false Boolean always satisfies it. This is a Boolean admissibility condition and supplies no report contents, recipient, disclosure event, or evidence that anyone reports anything. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:111` (lines 111–112). - -```lean - -def ChangeReported (before after : List Fact) (claimsUnchanged : Bool) : Prop := - before ≠ after → claimsUnchanged = false - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:117` (lines 117–120). - -```lean - -theorem changed_set_needs_report : - ¬ ChangeReported [.p, .pImpliesQ, .notQ] [.p, .pImpliesQ] true := by - unfold ChangeReported - decide - -``` - -### CoreReader: A missing natural number alongside independently true and false claims - -ObservationComplete observed requires every natural number to belong to a finite list. observation_gap refutes completeness of [0, 1] using 2. The code proves this one list's gap; in standard finite-list semantics no finite list contains all natural numbers, but that general statement is not a theorem in this file. gap_with_true_conclusion pairs the gap with ∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n, proved by reduction and reflexivity. gap_with_false_conclusion pairs it with ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0), refuted at 1. These are conjunctions with independent arithmetic results. They show this fixed membership gap coexists with a true selected universal statement and the falsity of another selected universal statement. No support relation connects the list to either statement; no observation reliability, induction rule, or general theory of evidential support is defined. The quantifier is over all Nat, not all members of the observed list. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:125` (lines 125–125). - -```lean - -def ObservationComplete (observed : List Nat) : Prop := ∀ n, n ∈ observed - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:130` (lines 130–133). - -```lean - -theorem observation_gap : ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] := by - intro h - have h2 := h 2 - simp at h2 - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:138` (lines 138–140). - -```lean - -theorem gap_with_true_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ (∀ n : Nat, n + 0 = n) := - ⟨observation_gap, fun _ => rfl⟩ - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:145` (lines 145–150). - -```lean - -theorem gap_with_false_conclusion : - ¬ ObservationComplete [0, 1] ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n = 0) := by - refine ⟨observation_gap, ?_⟩ - intro h - have bad := h 1 - cases bad - -``` - -### CoreReader: A singleton passes an equation which fails universally - -proposedPrinciple is n + 1 = 2 * n over Nat; selfAssessmentSamples is [1]. The theorem proves every list member satisfies the equation, by reducing membership to n = 1 and computing. It refutes universal satisfaction by evaluating the assumed equation at 0, where 1 = 0 would follow. All variables here are natural numbers; the bounded syntax ∀ n ∈ samples expands to ∀ n, n ∈ samples → equation n. This is a finite-sample arithmetic counterexample. No self-assessment process, evaluator, philosophy object, or correctness relation is modeled; the declaration names do not add one. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–154). - -```lean - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -def selfAssessmentSamples : List Nat := [1] - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:159` (lines 159–169). - -```lean - -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - (∀ n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples, proposedPrinciple n) ∧ ¬ (∀ n, proposedPrinciple n) := by - constructor - · intro n hn - simp [selfAssessmentSamples] at hn - subst n - unfold proposedPrinciple - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [proposedPrinciple] at bad - -``` - -### RationaleReader: Record projections, fixed updates, and separate latency data - -ServiceState is a pair of arbitrary natural numbers. direct and cachedRead are pure field projections. updateOnly replaces acknowledged and preserves cached; updateInvalidating ignores its old state and constructs (n, n). initial is (10, 10). LatencyContext is a separate triple; originalLatency is (5, 2, 6) and stricterLatency is (5, 2, 3), in direct/cache/budget order. withinBudget means both latency fields are at most budget. original_comparison computes agreement at initial and the inequalities 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6. There are no constraints relating a state's values or update functions to the latency records. These numbers are constants, with no units, measured workloads, I/O, concurrent execution, or latency distribution. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:3` (lines 3–28). - -```lean - -structure ServiceState where - acknowledged : Nat - cached : Nat - deriving DecidableEq - -def direct (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.acknowledged - -def cachedRead (s : ServiceState) : Nat := s.cached - -def updateOnly (s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := { s with acknowledged := n } - -def updateInvalidating (_s : ServiceState) (n : Nat) : ServiceState := ⟨n, n⟩ - -def initial : ServiceState := ⟨10, 10⟩ - -structure LatencyContext where - directLatency : Nat - cacheLatency : Nat - budget : Nat - -def originalLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 6⟩ - -def stricterLatency : LatencyContext := ⟨5, 2, 3⟩ - -def withinBudget (c : LatencyContext) : Prop := - c.directLatency ≤ c.budget ∧ c.cacheLatency ≤ c.budget - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:33` (lines 33–35). - -```lean - -theorem original_comparison : direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ withinBudget originalLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: A stale projection for one update and a false universal equality - -update_read_counterexample proves initial agreement at 10 and disagreement after updateOnly initial 11, whose fields are (11, 10). cached_freshness_refuted disproves ∀ n : Nat, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n by n = 11; the cached field remains 10. Thus the supplied universal equality fails in the explicitly constructed pure model. This is not a proof about all cache implementations, or a measured service failure. Neither theorem states a general implication from initial agreement to all subsequent agreement; the fixture instead supplies a concrete before/after contrast. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:41` (lines 41–43). - -```lean - -theorem update_read_counterexample : - direct initial = cachedRead initial ∧ - direct (updateOnly initial 11) ≠ cachedRead (updateOnly initial 11) := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:48` (lines 48–51). - -```lean - -theorem cached_freshness_refuted : ¬ (∀ n, cachedRead (updateOnly initial n) = n) := by - intro h - have bad := h 11 - simp [cachedRead, updateOnly, initial] at bad - -``` - -### RationaleReader: Equal fields written directly; unchanged writes - -invalidation_restores_fixture computes that updateInvalidating initial 11 has both projections equal to 11, because the definition returns (11, 11). It models writing both values directly, not deletion of a cache entry or a protocol that later reloads one. unchanged_update_retained computes agreement after updateOnly initial 10, which preserves (10, 10). These theorems have no external premises and prove their particular numerical examples; neither claims a general temporal safety or invalidation theorem. The broader all-n equality for updateInvalidating follows from its definition, but is not the stated fixture theorem. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:56` (lines 56–57). - -```lean - -theorem invalidation_restores_fixture : - direct (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 ∧ cachedRead (updateInvalidating initial 11) = 11 := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:62` (lines 62–63). - -```lean - -theorem unchanged_update_retained : - direct (updateOnly initial 10) = cachedRead (updateOnly initial 10) := by decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: A budget-only change - -budget_change_is_distinct proves withinBudget (5, 2, 6) and not withinBudget (5, 2, 3). Both fixed latency numbers stay the same; the direct value 5 exceeds the smaller budget 3 although cache value 2 remains within it. The proof unfolds the predicate and computes. There is no causal claim that the service changed, no universal performance result, and no theorem connecting this budget condition to the separate cached-value disagreement. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:68` (lines 68–71). - -```lean - -theorem budget_change_is_distinct : - withinBudget originalLatency ∧ ¬ withinBudget stricterLatency := by - unfold withinBudget - decide - -``` - -### RationaleReader: An identity proof with a supplied proposition - -namedUniversalTruth explicitly quantifies over a proposition P and its assumed proof h : P, then returns exactly h. Its content is ∀ P : Prop, P → P. There are no hidden typeclass assumptions and no proof that an arbitrary proposition is true without h. In particular, the name does not create universal truth, philosophical correctness, or correspondence to any prose statement. This is the identity function on proofs. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:76` (lines 76–76). - -```lean - -theorem namedUniversalTruth (P : Prop) (h : P) : P := h - -``` - -### RationaleReader: One specific inequality and a different false generalization - -encoded_statement computes the single true inequality (0 : Nat) ≤ 1. different_statement_refuted refutes ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 at 2; case analysis of Nat's inductive ≤ proof reduces the impossible 2 ≤ 1 to an impossible 2 ≤ 0 case. proof_of_different_claim pairs the earlier results. It does not obtain the universal claim from the specific one. This proves a precise true/false contrast between two arithmetic statements, without a semantic encoding function or general theorem about the fidelity of formalization. - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:81` (lines 81–81). - -```lean - -theorem encoded_statement : (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 := by decide - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:86` (lines 86–90). - -```lean - -theorem different_statement_refuted : ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := by - intro h - have bad := h 2 - cases bad with - | step h => cases h - -``` - -Exact encoding: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:95` (lines 95–97). - -```lean - -theorem proof_of_different_claim : - (0 : Nat) ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ (∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1) := - ⟨encoded_statement, different_statement_refuted⟩ - -``` - -## Actual dependency audit - -The following checked declarations depend on Lean core `propext` (propositional extensionality, allowing equivalent propositions to be identified): `CoreReader.unrelated_grounds_rejected`, `CoreReader.joint_conflict`, `CoreReader.withdrawn_current_set`, `CoreReader.distinct_contexts`, `CoreReader.observation_gap`, `CoreReader.gap_with_true_conclusion`, `CoreReader.gap_with_false_conclusion`, `CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness`, `RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted`, `RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted`, and `RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim`. Every other top-level declaration audited in the two files reported no axioms. The complete declaration-by-declaration output is in `CoreReader.audit.log` and `RationaleReader.audit.log`; these statements refer to the checked proof terms, including any dependency introduced by tactic-generated proofs. No claim is made that a listed axiom is required by every possible proof of the proposition. - -## Appendix: every nonblank source line - -Each numbered entry explains its actual line. Exact code is preserved in the excerpts above and the audit copies. Mapping comments supply metadata only. The machine-readable equivalent is `line-explanations.json`. - -### CoreReader.lean - -Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`; SHA-256 `bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`. - -- L1: Open the CoreReader namespace; subsequent declaration names receive this prefix. - -- L3: Declare the type Aspect with exactly three distinct nullary constructors, empirical, inferential, and value. The names alone do not define any domain interpretation. - -- L4: Generate a DecidableEq instance, permitting computable equality decisions for any two Aspect values. - -- L6: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L7: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L8: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L9: Begin the proposition-valued definition Duties, taking an arbitrary applicability predicate on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - -- L10: Add an arbitrary ternary examined predicate on claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect, and explicit natural-number claim and grounds parameters. No properties of these predicates are assumed. - -- L11: Duties means: for every Aspect, if it is applicable to this claim, the examined relation holds for this same claim, these same grounds, and that Aspect. This is vacuously true when no aspect is applicable. - -- L13: Begin Assessed with an explicit list of Aspect labels and an arbitrary applicability predicate. The underscore-prefixed label argument is unused. - -- L14: Take the examined predicate and natural-number claim and grounds identifiers; the result is a proposition. - -- L15: Define Assessed to be exactly Duties on these predicates and identifiers; labels neither restrict nor strengthen the proposition. - -- L17: Define mixedClaim on a natural-number claim identifier and an Aspect. - -- L18: It holds exactly when the claim identifier is 7 and the aspect is either empirical or value; inferential never satisfies it. - -- L20: Define bothExamined on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - -- L21: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and either empirical or value. Conjunction is nested to the right. - -- L23: Define empiricalOnly on a claim identifier, grounds identifier, and Aspect. - -- L24: It holds exactly at claim 7, grounds 3, and empirical. It has no value or inferential case. - -- L26: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L27: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L28: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L29: Begin a universally parameterized theorem over arbitrary applicability and examined predicates a and e. - -- L30: Take explicit natural numbers c and g, an assumed proof h of Duties a e c g, and assumed proofs that empirical and value are applicable to c. - -- L31: Conclude both corresponding e facts at the same c and g. Construct their conjunction by applying h separately to he and hv; each underscore is an inferred Aspect argument. No examination fact is established without these premises. - -- L33: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L34: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L35: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L36: Begin a theorem for any two label lists xs and ys and any applicability predicate a. - -- L37: Also quantify over the examined predicate and the claim and grounds identifiers. - -- L38: Prove the two Assessed propositions equivalent by Iff.rfl: both reduce to the identical Duties proposition because labels are ignored. This is a definitional identity, not an empirical finding about labels. - -- L40: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L41: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L42: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L43: State that the concrete predicates mixedClaim and bothExamined satisfy Duties at claim 7 and grounds 3; begin a tactic proof. - -- L44: Introduce an arbitrary aspect k and a proof hk that mixedClaim 7 k holds. - -- L45: Construct bothExamined 7 3 k: reuse hk's equality 7 = 7, prove 3 = 3 by reflexivity, and reuse hk's aspect disjunction. - -- L47: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L48: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L49: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L50: State that the concrete empiricalOnly relation does not satisfy Duties for mixedClaim at 7 and 3. - -- L51: Assume the disputed Duties proposition, aiming to derive False. - -- L52: Apply that assumption to value; establish applicability by 7 = 7 and the right disjunct value = value. The result hv is empiricalOnly 7 3 value. - -- L53: Extract hv's innermost equality value = empirical and eliminate it, since these are distinct Aspect constructors. - -- L55: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L56: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L57: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L58: State failure of Duties when bothExamined is queried at grounds identifier 4 instead of its hard-coded 3. - -- L59: Assume Duties at claim 7 and grounds 4 for contradiction. - -- L60: Apply it to the applicable value aspect, obtaining bothExamined 7 4 value. - -- L61: Eliminate the resulting equality 4 = 3 (hv.2.1). The contradiction follows from numeral inequality, not a separately defined notion of relevance. - -- L63: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L64: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L65: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L66: State that an empty label list does not make Assessed true for mixedClaim and empiricalOnly at 7 and 3. - -- L67: Reuse empirical_only_rejected directly; unfolding Assessed gives precisely that earlier theorem's negated proposition. - -- L69: Declare Fact as a type with five distinct nullary constructors. In particular pImpliesQ is a token, not a Lean implication, and notQ is a token, not logical negation. - -- L70: Generate decidable equality for Fact, enabling concrete list-membership decisions. - -- L72: Define a relation between a finite list of Fact tokens, a natural-number context, and a Boolean polarity. The list need not be duplicate-free. - -- L73: The first context-0 branch requires polarity true and membership of both p and pImpliesQ, or continues with the alternative on the next line. - -- L74: The other context-0 alternative requires polarity false and membership of notQ. This closes the context-0 branch. - -- L75: A separate branch holds at context 1 with polarity true when positiveInOne belongs to the list. - -- L76: The final branch holds at context 2 with polarity false when negativeInTwo belongs to the list. There are no other branches or inference rules. - -- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L81: Define Consistent using an arbitrary consequence relation of the displayed type and a finite list of Fact tokens. - -- L82: Require that at each natural-number context the relation cannot hold for both true and false polarity on this same list. No constraints link the supplied relation to logical entailment. - -- L84: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L85: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L86: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L87: State that the list [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] fails Consistent under the specific fixtureConsequence relation. - -- L88: Assume consistency of that list for contradiction. - -- L89: Specialize consistency to context 0 and supply both polarities, each proved by simplifying the explicit relation and concrete list membership. - -- L91: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L92: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L93: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L94: State consistency of the shorter list [p, pImpliesQ] under fixtureConsequence. - -- L95: For an arbitrary context, assume both polarities hold, aiming for False. - -- L96: Simplify the assumed false-polarity conjunct h.2. Neither notQ nor negativeInTwo is present, so every possible false-polarity branch is impossible. - -- L98: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L99: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L100: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L101: State consistency for [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] under the fixture relation. - -- L102: Introduce a common context and the assumption that both polarities hold there. - -- L103: Simplify the true-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 1. - -- L104: Simplify the false-polarity part: the only available branch forces context = 2. - -- L105: Compose the reversed first equality with the second to obtain the impossible natural-number equality 1 = 2. - -- L106: Eliminate the impossible equality, completing the contradiction. - -- L108: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L109: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L110: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L111: Define ChangeReported on two lists and a Boolean called claimsUnchanged. These are explicit inputs, without time, speakers, or report objects. - -- L112: Require that unequal lists imply claimsUnchanged = false. Equal lists make the condition vacuous. List equality is order- and multiplicity-sensitive; false does not supply any report content. - -- L114: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L115: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L116: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L117: Begin the following concrete negation theorem about ChangeReported. - -- L118: State that changing [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] to [p, pImpliesQ] while passing true does not satisfy ChangeReported. - -- L119: Unfold ChangeReported into its implication from list inequality to a Boolean equality. - -- L120: Close the decidable concrete proposition by computation: the lists differ but true is not false. - -- L122: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L123: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L124: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L125: Define ObservationComplete observed to mean that every natural number belongs to the finite list observed. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat from list membership. No observation procedure is modeled. - -- L127: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L128: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L129: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L130: State that the list [0, 1] does not contain every natural number. - -- L131: Assume completeness for contradiction. - -- L132: Instantiate the universal membership assumption at 2, obtaining 2 ∈ [0, 1]. - -- L133: Simplify that impossible concrete membership to False. - -- L135: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L136: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L137: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L138: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and an arithmetic truth. - -- L139: State together that [0, 1] is not ObservationComplete and every natural number satisfies n + 0 = n. - -- L140: Build the conjunction from observation_gap and the function giving reflexivity at every natural number; Nat addition reduces n + 0 to n. The arithmetic proof is independent of the list. - -- L142: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L143: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L144: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L145: Begin a conjunction theorem about incomplete membership and a false universal equality. - -- L146: State together that [0, 1] is incomplete and it is false that every natural number equals 0. - -- L147: Provide observation_gap as the first conjunct and leave a proof obligation for the negated universal statement. - -- L148: Assume all natural numbers equal 0, aiming for False. - -- L149: Specialize that assumption to 1, obtaining 1 = 0. - -- L150: Eliminate the impossible numeral equality. - -- L152: Define proposedPrinciple n as the natural-number equation n + 1 = 2 * n. The name does not confer any philosophical or normative status. - -- L154: Define selfAssessmentSamples as the singleton natural-number list [1]. No assessment algorithm is encoded. - -- L156: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L157: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L158: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L159: Begin a theorem contrasting the fixed sample list with universal arithmetic validity. - -- L160: State that every member of [1] satisfies n + 1 = 2 * n, and that this equation does not hold for every natural number. The bounded quantifier expands to ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n. - -- L161: Split the conjunction into its sampled and universal-negation proof obligations. - -- L162: For the first obligation, introduce an arbitrary natural number n and its assumed sample-list membership hn. - -- L163: Unfold the singleton list and simplify membership, obtaining n = 1. - -- L164: Substitute 1 for n in the goal. - -- L165: Unfold proposedPrinciple to the arithmetic equation at 1. - -- L166: Prove the concrete equality 1 + 1 = 2 * 1 by decidable computation. - -- L167: For the second obligation, assume the equation holds at every natural number. - -- L168: Specialize the assumption to 0. - -- L169: Unfold and simplify the equation at 0, yielding the contradiction 1 = 0. - -- L171: Close the CoreReader namespace. - -### RationaleReader.lean - -Source: `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`; SHA-256 `dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`. - -- L1: Open the RationaleReader namespace. - -- L3: Declare ServiceState as a structure with two independent natural-number fields; its constructor requires no invariant relating them. - -- L4: Declare the acknowledged field, an arbitrary natural number. - -- L5: Declare the cached field, an arbitrary natural number, independent of acknowledged. - -- L6: Generate decidable equality for ServiceState by comparing its fields. - -- L8: Define direct as projection of a state's acknowledged field; no I/O occurs. - -- L10: Define cachedRead as projection of a state's cached field; no I/O occurs. - -- L12: Define updateOnly to return a copy of s with acknowledged replaced by n and cached preserved. It is a pure function, not an in-place operation. - -- L14: Define updateInvalidating to ignore its old state entirely and return the pair (n, n). Despite its name, it directly writes both fields; it has no invalid marker, eviction, fetch, or invalidation protocol. - -- L16: Define initial as the state acknowledged = 10 and cached = 10. - -- L18: Declare LatencyContext with three arbitrary natural-number fields and no consistency invariant. - -- L19: Declare directLatency, with no specified units or measured behavior. - -- L20: Declare cacheLatency, likewise an unconstrained natural number. - -- L21: Declare budget, an arbitrary natural number. - -- L23: Define originalLatency as directLatency 5, cacheLatency 2, and budget 6. - -- L25: Define stricterLatency with the same two latency numbers and budget 3. - -- L27: Begin the predicate withinBudget for a LatencyContext. - -- L28: Require both directLatency ≤ budget and cacheLatency ≤ budget, using ordinary natural-number order. - -- L30: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L31: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L32: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L33: State that the two projections of initial agree and that both numbers in originalLatency lie within its budget. - -- L34: Expand withinBudget to its pair of inequalities. - -- L35: Prove by decidable computation the concrete conjunction 10 = 10 and (5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6). - -- L37: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L38: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L39: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L40: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L41: Begin a theorem containing agreement before and disagreement after one pure state transformation. - -- L42: The first conjunct says direct and cachedRead both yield 10 on initial. - -- L43: The second says that after updateOnly initial 11, direct and cachedRead differ: their values are 11 and 10. Compute both conjuncts using decide. - -- L45: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L46: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L47: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L48: State that it is false that for every natural number n the cached projection after updateOnly initial n equals n. The unannotated n is inferred as Nat. - -- L49: Assume this universal equality for contradiction. - -- L50: Specialize it to 11. - -- L51: Expand the projections, update, and initial state; the assumed equality becomes 10 = 11 and simplifies to False. - -- L53: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L54: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L55: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L56: Begin a concrete conjunction theorem about updateInvalidating initial 11. - -- L57: Prove by computation that both fields of the returned state are 11. This follows from construction of (11, 11), not a modeled cache invalidation process. - -- L59: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L60: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L61: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L62: Begin a theorem about an update that writes the already stored acknowledged value. - -- L63: Compute that updateOnly initial 10 retains equality of its two projections, both 10. - -- L65: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L66: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L67: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L68: Begin a conjunction theorem comparing two fixed LatencyContext records. - -- L69: State that originalLatency is withinBudget and stricterLatency is not. - -- L70: Expand withinBudget in both parts to numerical inequalities. - -- L71: Compute that 5 ≤ 6 and 2 ≤ 6 hold, whereas (5 ≤ 3 and 2 ≤ 3) fails because 5 ≤ 3 fails. - -- L73: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L74: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L75: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L76: For any proposition P and an explicitly supplied proof h of P, return h as a proof of P. The theorem is ∀ P : Prop, P → P, not a proof that all propositions are true. It has no omitted domain or correctness premise. - -- L78: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L79: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L80: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L81: Prove the specific natural-number inequality 0 ≤ 1 by decidable computation. - -- L83: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L84: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L85: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L86: State that it is false that every natural number is at most 1. - -- L87: Assume the universal inequality for contradiction. - -- L88: Apply it to 2, obtaining 2 ≤ 1. - -- L89: Case-analyze the impossible proof of 2 ≤ 1 using Nat's inductive order constructors. - -- L90: In the surviving step-constructor case, the residual proof h is of 2 ≤ 0; case analysis finds no possible constructor, completing False. - -- L92: Open a documentation comment identifying the following declaration for mapping. This is metadata and supplies no Lean premise or source meaning. - -- L93: Record a mapping identifier and source hash inside a comment. They identify material only; their text is neither an interpreted proposition nor proof evidence. - -- L94: Close the mapping documentation comment; comments have no logical force. - -- L95: Begin a conjunction theorem combining a true specific inequality and a false universal generalization. - -- L96: State 0 ≤ 1 together with the negation of ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1. - -- L97: Construct the conjunction by reusing encoded_statement and different_statement_refuted, with no new reasoning connecting their quantifiers. - -- L99: Close the RationaleReader namespace. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md deleted file mode 100644 index c2eceb2..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-blind-initial.zh.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,477 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `2604d478b8cc776bd766a67a2edd4b27cd99f8b6c781d3f564fc751b0ae98425`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 两份 Lean 读者编码的初始盲解释（中文译稿） - -本稿翻译已经冻结的英文代码解释，没有读取来源原文或更新后的编码。英文初稿 initial.en.md 及其 SHA-256 保持不变；本稿不评估来源忠实性。 - -## 代码含义概览 - -CoreReader 的 Duties 是条件义务：对三个 Aspect 中的每个方面，若任意 supplied applicable 谓词判为适用，则同一主张及依据对应的 examined 关系必须成立。Assessed 完全忽略标签列表，因此标签不影响结果是定义直接决定的。具体示例用编号 7、3 及固定方面建立成立或不成立；编号 4 被拒绝来自 4 ≠ 3，不来自另外定义的相关性关系。 - -Fact 是五种标记，不含命题公式或逻辑赋值。fixtureConsequence 只有手写的三个语境分支；Consistent 排除同一语境中同一列表的两种布尔极性同时成立。具体定理证明该有限关系上的冲突、删除 notQ 后无负极性分支，以及不同语境不能成为同一语境；没有一般逻辑的演绎闭包或实际撤回过程。 - -ChangeReported 仅要求列表不等时布尔参数为 false，不含报告内容或行为。列表有序且允许重复；相同列表令蕴含空真。ObservationComplete 要求有限列表包含所有自然数；[0, 1] 在 2 处失败。其余两个定理将这项缺口分别与独立的算术真命题和假全称命题的否定组成合取，没有定义列表对结论的支持关系。 - -初始 selfAssessmentSamples 是 [1]，proposedPrinciple 是 n + 1 = 2 * n。证明在唯一样本 1 处成立，在 0 处失败；初始编码没有自评算法、评估者或哲学对象。 - -RationaleReader 的 ServiceState 只是两个自然数字段；direct 和 cachedRead 是纯投影，updateOnly 只写 acknowledged，初始 updateInvalidating 直接返回 (n, n)。这些是纯函数，没有 I/O、并发、失效标志或重新加载协议。具体例子证明 (10, 10) 初始一致，单字段改为 11 后成为 (11, 10)，两个字段直接写为 11 后一致，以及写回原值 10 后一致。 - -延迟记录独立于状态和更新函数。两个延迟恒为 5、2，预算从 6 改为 3 后，直接延迟不再达标；没有单位、测量或因果关系。namedUniversalTruth 对任意 P 和显式 h : P 直接返回 h，内容仅为 P → P。最后三个定理证明 0 ≤ 1，同时用 2 反驳所有自然数均 ≤ 1；没有语义编码函数或一般形式化忠实性定理。 - -## 检查及依赖 - -原始两个文件的逐字副本附加每个顶层声明的 #print axioms 后，均在 Lean 4.33.1 实际检查成功。部分证明依赖 Lean core 的 propext，其余已审计顶层声明无公理依赖。确切逐声明输出见同目录 CoreReader.audit.log、RationaleReader.audit.log；英文稿列出全部 propext 声明。检查仅证明这些形式命题的内核有效性，不证明哲学正确性或来源忠实性。 - -## 全部非空行解释 - -### CoreReader.lean - -路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`bf374ca16008b53f25b1f9787111bb3ae8474a4c62009aaa1731e9df913ac37b`。 - -- L1：打开 CoreReader 命名空间；后续声明名带此前缀。 - -- L3：声明 Aspect 类型，恰有 empirical、inferential、value 三个互异的无参数构造子；名称本身没有定义领域含义。 - -- L4：生成 DecidableEq 实例，使任意两个 Aspect 值的相等性可计算判定。 - -- L6：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L7：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L8：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L9：开始定义命题 Duties，接收以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的任意适用性谓词 applicable。 - -- L10：再接收关于主张编号、依据编号和 Aspect 的任意三元谓词 examined，以及显式自然数参数 claim、grounds；未假设这些谓词具备任何性质。 - -- L11：Duties 表示：对每个 Aspect，若它适用于当前主张，则 examined 对同一主张、同一依据及该 Aspect 成立。没有任何适用方面时，此条件空真。 - -- L13：开始定义 Assessed，显式接收 Aspect 标签列表和任意适用性谓词；以下划线开头的标签参数未被使用。 - -- L14：接收 examined 谓词以及自然数主张、依据编号；返回命题。 - -- L15：将 Assessed 定义为这些谓词和编号对应的 Duties；标签既不限制也不加强该命题。 - -- L17：定义以自然数主张编号和 Aspect 为参数的 mixedClaim。 - -- L18：它恰在主张编号为 7 且方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；inferential 从不满足。 - -- L20：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 bothExamined。 - -- L21：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 或 value 时成立；合取向右嵌套。 - -- L23：定义以主张编号、依据编号及 Aspect 为参数的 empiricalOnly。 - -- L24：它恰在主张为 7、依据为 3、方面为 empirical 时成立；没有 value 或 inferential 分支。 - -- L26：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L27：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L28：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L29：开始一个对任意适用性谓词 a 和 examined 谓词 e 全称参数化的定理。 - -- L30：显式接收自然数 c、g，Duties a e c g 的假定证明 h，以及 empirical 和 value 适用于 c 的假定证明。 - -- L31：结论是在同一 c、g 上的两个 e 事实同时成立；分别把 h 用于 he、hv，再组成合取。下划线是推断出的 Aspect 实参；没有脱离这些前提建立任何 examination 事实。 - -- L33：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L34：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L35：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L36：开始一个关于任意两个标签列表 xs、ys 以及任意适用性谓词 a 的定理。 - -- L37：还量化 examined 谓词以及主张、依据编号。 - -- L38：用 Iff.rfl 证明两个 Assessed 命题等价：标签被忽略，两者都归约为同一 Duties 命题。这是定义恒等，不是关于标签的经验发现。 - -- L40：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L41：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L42：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L43：陈述具体谓词 mixedClaim、bothExamined 在主张 7、依据 3 处满足 Duties，并开始 tactic 证明。 - -- L44：引入任意方面 k 及 mixedClaim 7 k 的证明 hk。 - -- L45：构造 bothExamined 7 3 k：复用 hk 中的 7 = 7，用自反性证明 3 = 3，再复用 hk 中的方面析取。 - -- L47：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L48：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L49：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L50：陈述具体关系 empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处不满足 mixedClaim 的 Duties。 - -- L51：假设所否定的 Duties 命题，目标为推出 False。 - -- L52：把该假设用于 value；用 7 = 7 和右侧析取 value = value 建立适用性，得到 hv : empiricalOnly 7 3 value。 - -- L53：取出 hv 最内层的等式 value = empirical，利用两个 Aspect 构造子互异将其消去。 - -- L55：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L56：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L57：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L58：陈述在依据编号 4 而非 bothExamined 固定的 3 处，Duties 不成立。 - -- L59：为推出矛盾，假设主张 7、依据 4 处成立 Duties。 - -- L60：将其用于适用的 value 方面，得到 bothExamined 7 4 value。 - -- L61：消去得到的等式 4 = 3，即 hv.2.1。矛盾来自数值不等，而非单独定义的相关性概念。 - -- L63：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L64：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L65：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L66：陈述空标签列表无法使 mixedClaim、empiricalOnly 在 7、3 处的 Assessed 成立。 - -- L67：直接复用 empirical_only_rejected；展开 Assessed 后恰为此前定理否定的命题。 - -- L69：声明具有五个互异无参数构造子的 Fact 类型；pImpliesQ 是标记而非 Lean 蕴含，notQ 是标记而非逻辑否定。 - -- L70：生成 Fact 的可判定相等性，使具体列表成员关系可计算判定。 - -- L72：定义有限 Fact 标记列表、自然数语境和布尔极性之间的关系；列表不必无重复。 - -- L73：第一个语境 0 分支要求极性为 true 且 p、pImpliesQ 都属于列表，或者采用下一行的备选条件。 - -- L74：语境 0 的另一条件要求极性为 false 且 notQ 属于列表；此处结束语境 0 分支。 - -- L75：独立分支要求语境为 1、极性为 true 且 positiveInOne 属于列表。 - -- L76：最后一个分支要求语境为 2、极性为 false 且 negativeInTwo 属于列表；没有其他分支或推理规则。 - -- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L81：以所示类型的任意 consequence 关系及有限 Fact 标记列表定义 Consistent。 - -- L82：要求每个自然数语境中，同一列表的 true 和 false 两种极性不能同时满足该关系；未限制所传关系必须对应逻辑蕴涵。 - -- L84：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L85：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L86：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L87：陈述列表 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 在具体 fixtureConsequence 下不满足 Consistent。 - -- L88：为推出矛盾，假设该列表满足一致性条件。 - -- L89：将一致性条件用于语境 0，提供两种极性的证明；它们分别通过简化显式关系和具体列表成员关系得到。 - -- L91：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L92：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L93：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L94：陈述较短列表 [p, pImpliesQ] 在 fixtureConsequence 下满足一致性条件。 - -- L95：对任意语境，假设两种极性同时成立，目标为 False。 - -- L96：简化 false 极性的假设 h.2；列表中既没有 notQ 也没有 negativeInTwo，因此所有 false 分支都不可能。 - -- L98：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L99：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L100：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L101：陈述 [positiveInOne, negativeInTwo] 在示例关系下满足一致性条件。 - -- L102：引入同一个语境，并假设两种极性都在其中成立。 - -- L103：简化 true 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 1。 - -- L104：简化 false 部分；唯一可能分支强制 context = 2。 - -- L105：把第一个等式反向后与第二个复合，得到不可能的自然数等式 1 = 2。 - -- L106：消去不可能的等式，完成矛盾证明。 - -- L108：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L109：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L110：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L111：以两个列表和名为 claimsUnchanged 的布尔值定义 ChangeReported；这些都是显式输入，没有时间、说话者或报告对象。 - -- L112：要求列表不等蕴含 claimsUnchanged = false；列表相等时条件空真。列表相等区分顺序和重复次数；false 不提供任何报告内容。 - -- L114：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L115：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L116：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L117：开始如下关于 ChangeReported 的具体否定定理。 - -- L118：陈述从 [p, pImpliesQ, notQ] 改为 [p, pImpliesQ] 且传入 true 时不满足 ChangeReported。 - -- L119：将 ChangeReported 展开为从列表不等到布尔等式的蕴含。 - -- L120：计算判定这个具体命题：列表不同，但 true 不等于 false。 - -- L122：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L123：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L124：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L125：定义 ObservationComplete observed 为每个自然数都属于有限列表 observed；未标注类型的 n 由成员关系推断为 Nat。没有建模观察过程。 - -- L127：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L128：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L129：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L130：陈述列表 [0, 1] 不包含全部自然数。 - -- L131：为推出矛盾，假设其完备。 - -- L132：把全称成员假设用于 2，得到 2 ∈ [0, 1]。 - -- L133：将这个不可能的具体成员关系简化为 False。 - -- L135：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L136：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L137：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L138：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个算术真命题。 - -- L139：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不满足 ObservationComplete，以及每个自然数满足 n + 0 = n。 - -- L140：用 observation_gap 和对每个自然数给出自反性证明的函数构造合取；Nat 加法把 n + 0 归约为 n。算术证明独立于列表。 - -- L142：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L143：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L144：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L145：开始一个合取定理，连接成员关系的不完备和一个错误全称等式。 - -- L146：同时陈述 [0, 1] 不完备，以及“每个自然数都等于 0”为假。 - -- L147：把 observation_gap 用作第一个合取项，留下被否定全称命题的证明目标。 - -- L148：假设所有自然数都等于 0，目标为 False。 - -- L149：将假设用于 1，得到 1 = 0。 - -- L150：消去不可能的数值等式。 - -- L152：将 proposedPrinciple n 定义为自然数等式 n + 1 = 2 * n；名称没有赋予其哲学或规范地位。 - -- L154：将 selfAssessmentSamples 定义为单元素自然数列表 [1]；没有编码评估算法。 - -- L156：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L157：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L158：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L159：开始一个比较固定样本列表与算术全称有效性的定理。 - -- L160：陈述 [1] 中每个元素满足 n + 1 = 2 * n，而非每个自然数都满足它。受限量词展开为 ∀ n, n ∈ selfAssessmentSamples → proposedPrinciple n。 - -- L161：将合取拆为样本成立和否定全称成立两个证明目标。 - -- L162：对第一个目标，引入任意自然数 n 及其属于样本列表的假设 hn。 - -- L163：展开单元素列表并简化成员关系，得到 n = 1。 - -- L164：在目标中用 1 替换 n。 - -- L165：展开 proposedPrinciple，得到 1 处的算术等式。 - -- L166：通过可判定计算证明具体等式 1 + 1 = 2 * 1。 - -- L167：对第二个目标，假设该等式在每个自然数处都成立。 - -- L168：将假设用于 0。 - -- L169：展开并简化 0 处的等式，得到矛盾 1 = 0。 - -- L171：关闭 CoreReader 命名空间。 - -### RationaleReader.lean - -路径：`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`；初始 SHA-256：`dac93299e00a61c7402daa22118950d5bfd891a471690c76ccadb7ac62f5b6b6`。 - -- L1：打开 RationaleReader 命名空间。 - -- L3：声明结构 ServiceState，具有两个彼此独立的自然数字段；其构造子不要求两个字段之间满足任何不变量。 - -- L4：声明 acknowledged 字段，取任意自然数。 - -- L5：声明 cached 字段，取任意自然数，独立于 acknowledged。 - -- L6：通过比较字段生成 ServiceState 的可判定相等性。 - -- L8：将 direct 定义为状态 acknowledged 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - -- L10：将 cachedRead 定义为状态 cached 字段的投影；没有 I/O。 - -- L12：将 updateOnly 定义为返回 s 的副本，把 acknowledged 换成 n 并保留 cached；这是纯函数而非原地操作。 - -- L14：将 updateInvalidating 定义为完全忽略旧状态并返回 (n, n)；尽管名称如此，它直接写入两个字段，没有无效标志、逐出、读取或失效协议。 - -- L16：将 initial 定义为 acknowledged = 10、cached = 10 的状态。 - -- L18：声明 LatencyContext，含三个任意自然数字段，没有一致性不变量。 - -- L19：声明 directLatency；未规定单位或测得的行为。 - -- L20：声明 cacheLatency，同样是不受约束的自然数。 - -- L21：声明 budget，取任意自然数。 - -- L23：将 originalLatency 定义为 directLatency 5、cacheLatency 2、budget 6。 - -- L25：将 stricterLatency 定义为相同两个延迟数值和预算 3。 - -- L27：开始定义 LatencyContext 的 withinBudget 谓词。 - -- L28：使用自然数的通常次序，要求 directLatency ≤ budget 且 cacheLatency ≤ budget。 - -- L30：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L31：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L32：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L33：陈述 initial 的两个投影相等，且 originalLatency 的两个数值都不超预算。 - -- L34：将 withinBudget 展开为两个不等式。 - -- L35：通过可判定计算证明具体合取 10 = 10 且（5 ≤ 6 且 2 ≤ 6）。 - -- L37：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L38：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L39：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L40：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L41：开始一个定理，陈述一次纯状态变换前相等、变换后不等。 - -- L42：第一个合取项陈述 direct 和 cachedRead 在 initial 上都返回 10。 - -- L43：第二个合取项陈述 updateOnly initial 11 后，direct、cachedRead 分别为 11、10，因而不同；使用 decide 计算两个合取项。 - -- L45：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L46：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L47：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L48：陈述“对每个自然数 n，updateOnly initial n 后缓存投影都等于 n”为假；未标注类型的 n 推断为 Nat。 - -- L49：为推出矛盾，假设此全称等式。 - -- L50：将其用于 11。 - -- L51：展开投影、更新及初始状态；假设变为 10 = 11，并简化为 False。 - -- L53：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L54：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L55：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L56：开始一个关于 updateInvalidating initial 11 的具体合取定理。 - -- L57：通过计算证明返回状态的两个字段均为 11；这来自构造 (11, 11)，而非已建模的缓存失效过程。 - -- L59：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L60：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L61：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L62：开始一个关于写入 acknowledged 已存值的更新定理。 - -- L63：计算证明 updateOnly initial 10 仍保持两个投影相等，且均为 10。 - -- L65：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L66：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L67：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L68：开始一个比较两个固定 LatencyContext 记录的合取定理。 - -- L69：陈述 originalLatency 满足 withinBudget，而 stricterLatency 不满足。 - -- L70：将两部分的 withinBudget 展开为数值不等式。 - -- L71：计算证明 5 ≤ 6、2 ≤ 6 成立，而（5 ≤ 3 且 2 ≤ 3）因 5 ≤ 3 不成立而失败。 - -- L73：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L74：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L75：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L76：对任意命题 P 和显式提供的证明 h : P，返回 h 作为 P 的证明；内容是 ∀ P : Prop, P → P，而非所有命题都真的证明。没有遗漏的领域前提或正确性前提。 - -- L78：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L79：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L80：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L81：通过可判定计算证明具体自然数不等式 0 ≤ 1。 - -- L83：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L84：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L85：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L86：陈述“每个自然数都不大于 1”为假。 - -- L87：为推出矛盾，假设全称不等式。 - -- L88：将其用于 2，得到 2 ≤ 1。 - -- L89：利用 Nat 归纳次序的构造子，对不可能的 2 ≤ 1 证明作分类讨论。 - -- L90：在剩余的 step 构造子分支，残余证明 h 为 2 ≤ 0；分类讨论找不到可用构造子，从而证明 False。 - -- L92：打开用于标识后续声明对应关系的文档注释；它是元数据，不提供 Lean 前提或来源含义。 - -- L93：在注释中记录映射标识及来源哈希；它们仅标识材料，其文本既不是被解释的命题，也不是证明证据。 - -- L94：关闭映射文档注释；注释没有逻辑效力。 - -- L95：开始一个合取定理，将真的具体不等式和假的全称推广组合。 - -- L96：同时陈述 0 ≤ 1 和 ∀ n : Nat, n ≤ 1 的否定。 - -- L97：复用 encoded_statement、different_statement_refuted 构造合取；没有新增连接两者量词的推理。 - -- L99：关闭 RationaleReader 命名空间。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index dcc68e1..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/code-informed-update.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,95 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `bd4eb98a1b1369a610195329d9f33f2162c693aa31def3b28ec03d37874a0e17`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Informed code update: Round 2 (English) - -## Status and input boundary - -This is an informed incremental code explanation, not a fresh blind assessment. The original English explanation and line JSON were frozen before this update, and the original Chinese explanation and line JSON were completed without reading revised code. The initiating agent then disclosed the changed declaration locations and requested this update. That message mentioned a new stored-principle/sample computation and revised state-list comparison; it supplied no source prose or source correspondence judgment. The translator has now inspected the revised encoding, while still not reading PHILOSOPHY, rationale source prose, source snapshots, run.json, source-first judgments, author mapping interpretations, or prior records. Original blind artifacts remain unchanged. Source fidelity remains unevaluated. - -Current input hashes: - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean`: `49ee787c12f59a9885573c5b135a1d6bcaf02480246d29eae99891d1fb1d6803` - -- `AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean`: `2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7` - -## CoreReader: an actual finite Boolean assessment - -At lines 154–162, SelfAssessingSystem stores ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool and samples : List Nat. runOwnAssessment applies List.all to the samples with the function from that same record. This gives an explicit identity link: the function assessed on the finite samples is the very field later quantified over in the theorem. List.all evaluates to true on [] and evaluates p head && all tail p on a nonempty list. It therefore checks all listed inputs, without checking any unlisted input. The fields impose no sample-selection, nonemptiness, coverage, or correctness invariant. The word own is a field name; the code establishes that the function is stored in this record, but has no provenance or ownership relation. - -sampleSystem stores the Boolean function deciding n + 1 = 2 * n and the sample list [1]. The old proposedPrinciple definition at line 152 remains, but the function literally repeats its arithmetic expression rather than referring to that definition. The sample function is computational, using the inferred Decidable instance for natural-number equality. This library instance supplies an equality decision procedure, not an extra domain premise supplied by a caller. - -At lines 167–174, self_assessment_not_correctness proves runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true and ¬ (∀ n : Nat, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true). The first part unfolds the actual computation and decides the equation at 1. The second assumes true at every input, instantiates at 0, and simplifies the false arithmetic equation to the impossible Boolean equality false = true. Thus this one system passes its actual finite sample check while its own stored function fails at an untested input. This now includes an assessment computation that the initial encoding lacked. It remains a numerical example of finite testing; it does not encode assessment of an evaluator, recursive philosophical self-application, correctness of a philosophy, or fulfillment of an external responsibility. Passing the supplied finite test does not become a premise proving all-input validity. - -Exact revised encoding: - -`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean:152` (lines 152–174) - -```lean - -def proposedPrinciple (n : Nat) : Prop := n + 1 = 2 * n - -structure SelfAssessingSystem where - ownPrinciple : Nat → Bool - samples : List Nat - -def runOwnAssessment (s : SelfAssessingSystem) : Bool := - s.samples.all s.ownPrinciple - -def sampleSystem : SelfAssessingSystem := - ⟨fun n => decide (n + 1 = 2 * n), [1]⟩ - -/-- organon-map CoreReader.self_assessment_not_correctness -organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#c-83-c2 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc --/ -theorem self_assessment_not_correctness : - runOwnAssessment sampleSystem = true ∧ ¬ (∀ n, sampleSystem.ownPrinciple n = true) := by - constructor - · unfold runOwnAssessment sampleSystem - decide - · intro h - have bad := h 0 - simp [sampleSystem] at bad - -``` - -## RationaleReader: retaining one input while adding a revealing input - -The initial updateInvalidating definition and invalidation_restores_fixture theorem have been removed. Their old explanation describes only the frozen initial input; no current theorem models direct writes to both fields as a repair. - -At lines 91–96, originalStates is [initial] and revisedStates is [initial, updateOnly initial 11]. These are explicit lists of pure records: initial has (acknowledged, cached) = (10, 10), and the additional record has (11, 10). The original record is retained as the identical first list element. compareReads maps each input to the pair (direct state, cachedRead state); List.map preserves order and length. Despite its name, the function collects observations into pairs and does not itself test the two values for equality or produce an equivalence verdict. - -At lines 101–103, revised_method_retains_case proves the exact output lists [(10, 10)] and [(10, 10), (11, 10)] by decidable computation. This demonstrates for these two fixed input lists that expanding the selected cases retains the earlier equal pair and adds a differing pair. It does not repair the state transformation, establish cache freshness, prove a universal theorem about all method revisions, or model all possible update/read interleavings. The output lists provide concrete observable artifacts; they are not execution histories with timing or independent support for the chosen domain interpretation. - -Exact revised encoding: - -`AgentOrganon/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/leanified/RationaleReader.lean:91` (lines 91–103) - -```lean - -def originalStates : List ServiceState := [initial] - -def revisedStates : List ServiceState := [initial, updateOnly initial 11] - -def compareReads (states : List ServiceState) : List (Nat × Nat) := - states.map (fun state => (direct state, cachedRead state)) - -/-- organon-map RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case -rationale.L121#r-121-c4 sha256 572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803 --/ -theorem revised_method_retains_case : - compareReads originalStates = [(10, 10)] ∧ - compareReads revisedStates = [(10, 10), (11, 10)] := by decide - -``` - -## Retained claims and limits - -Unchanged declarations retain the code-derived meanings in the initial manuscript. In particular, Assessed still ignores labels; Duties still depends on arbitrary predicates; the token consequence relation is still finite and explicitly stipulated; ChangeReported is still only a Boolean condition on list inequality; the observation-gap conjunctions still have no evidence-support relation; and namedUniversalTruth still returns the supplied proof h unchanged. The new assessment computation and new state-list output theorem do not alter those independent limitations. Line numbers in the initial manuscript belong to the frozen initial inputs; use line-explanations-current.json for current locations. - -## Actual checks and dependencies - -Both revised files were copied verbatim into *.current.audit.lean with only #print axioms commands appended for every top-level declared definition, type, structure, and theorem, then elaborated and kernel-checked with installed Lean 4.33.1. Both commands exited 0. The declaration-by-declaration logs are CoreReader.current.audit.log and RationaleReader.current.audit.log. The same retained set of theorem names reported propext as in the initial audit; self_assessment_not_correctness still uses propext. The added SelfAssessingSystem, runOwnAssessment, sampleSystem, originalStates, revisedStates, compareReads, and revised_method_retains_case reported no axioms. No user axiom or sorry was introduced. The checked List.all body and Decidable.decide definition are recorded in core-library-inspection.log. Decidable.decide returns false for an isFalse decision and true for an isTrue decision; its Decidable argument is a core-inferred typeclass instance here. - -The full current nonblank-line explanation is line-explanations-current.json, with both en and zh for every line, including comments, fields, definitions, proof steps, and namespace delimiters. Unchanged entries were reused only through exact aligned code lines, while the changed Core block and all newly added Rationale lines were explained afresh. This is an explanation and formal dependency check, not independent validation of source meaning or philosophical correctness. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json deleted file mode 100644 index 82388be..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity-before-migration.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2630 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", - "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "initial_records": [ - { - "role": "source_initial", - "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", - "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" - }, - { - "role": "code_blind", - "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", - "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" - }, - { - "role": "code_informed_update", - "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", - "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison", - "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", - "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" - } - ], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", - "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", - "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", - "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", - "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", - "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", - "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", - "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - } - ], - "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json deleted file mode 100644 index 82388be..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/fidelity.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,2630 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "run_sha256": "57ae611f57bf8bdffcaa9a9f029fcdacbe6a1e3a4a5464c303ab87b110e7d936", - "source_sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", - "code_sha256": { - "leanified/RationaleReader.lean": "2a538b2c7b1313cb60ace76cae379ae75c73f0f5f8297bf9eda55b1b5702c0b7" - }, - "initial_records": [ - { - "role": "source_initial", - "path": "reviews/source-initial.md", - "sha256": "64196e2e045faa5899c9db07c9d755d21ff778d135351b4806a97d9f257729c4" - }, - { - "role": "code_blind", - "path": "reviews/code-blind-initial.en.md", - "sha256": "0f75aab3ab41a923af47524858e7868101d9f731798332a6a02056d4a1e0ac92" - }, - { - "role": "code_informed_update", - "path": "reviews/code-informed-update.en.md", - "sha256": "dc42e72aa998deb430b7a27a4038f64f5aa10d56f93d5f520215906b682f4053" - }, - { - "role": "source_comparison", - "path": "reviews/source-comparison-current.md", - "sha256": "2f39acfa49d709bab0a86db77938356fda270138b29895518a908b7386ab9ea6" - } - ], - "entries": [ - { - "id": "r-struct-1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-2", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-4", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-6", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-7", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-8", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-9", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-10", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-17", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-18", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-19", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-20", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-21", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-23", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-24", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-25", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-31", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-33", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-34", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-35", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-37", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-39", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-41", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-42", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-43", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-45", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-46", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-47", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-49", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-51", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-52", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-53", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-54", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-55", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-61", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-63", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-64", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-65", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-67", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-68", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-69", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim.", - "reason_zh": "namedUniversalTruth从显式前提h:P得到P，encoded_statement另证0≤1，可正确演示条件化推导及一个已检验陈述。它们未证明所有依赖下的Lean可靠性，也未证明任意散文编码与源文对应；定理名称不增加结论强度。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted.", - "reason_zh": "算术实例中局部陈述0≤1为真，更强的全称陈述∀n,n≤1为假（反例2），可展示在这个条件变化实例中证明前者不足以建立后者。一般对应失败不等于散文主张为假；原文也允许未由该证明支持但为真的散文主张。没有任何哲学承诺因此被反驳。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-91", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-92", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-93", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-95", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-97", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-99", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-100", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-101", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-103", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-104", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-105", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-106", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-107", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-113", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-114", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-115", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-116", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-117", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation.", - "reason_zh": "budget_change_is_distinct演示时延5/2满足预算6但不满足预算3，后者是另一个假设情境。映射定理没有新鲜度要求或后续读取顺序，只演示对既定预算的敏感性，未编码服务的合取义务。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result.", - "reason_zh": "original_comparison直接检查已确认值与缓存值均为10时回答相同，且两项预设时延均满足预算6。这是对应原文的具体静态数据实例；单一状态和预设时延不等于实际比较研究或整个负载范围的测量结果。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No current declaration is mapped to this inference clause. The obsolete software method-stage mapping has been withdrawn; arithmetic update/read fixtures do not by themselves encode this philosophical or reviewability inference.", - "reason_zh": "当前没有声明映射此推论子句；旧的软件方法阶段映射已撤回。算术更新/读取实例本身不能编码此哲学或可审查性推论。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements.", - "reason_zh": "初态输出相同，updateOnly至11后direct读取11而cachedRead仍为10，输入11同时反驳模型中的缓存普遍新鲜度。结合original_comparison可实现原文的局部反例；确认仅由状态字段及更新约定表示，没有并发执行或真实测量。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled.", - "reason_zh": "具体实现对在初态相同，在已确认值更新后不同，可作为“初始局部相同不能推出所有相关状态相同”的见证；成本、故障及其他影响方面的整体等价未建模。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "fidelity": "partial", - "reason": "compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite.", - "reason_zh": "compareReads现对不变的direct/cachedRead候选分别执行originalStates=[initial]与revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]，计算结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)。这补足了先前缺失的比较输入修订，而非实现修复。独立探针证实空列表、仅初态或同值更新均不暴露差异，因此贡献依赖纳入相关的变化数据状态。模型仍只使用预构造顺序状态及一个静态案例，不是一般评估流程、真实执行、并发或完整回归集合。", - "review_stage": "informed_source_comparison_after_separate_initial_records" - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-123", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-125", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-126", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-127", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-129", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-130", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-131", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-140", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-struct-142", - "fidelity": "not_applicable", - "reason": "This is a document-structure element or a table-cell role/name. It has no independent propositional content to formalize; preserve it as source context.", - "reason_zh": "此项是文档结构或表格单元的角色/名称，没有独立待形式化命题；应作为源文上下文保留。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "fidelity": "pending", - "reason": "No faithful encoding or proof is supplied for this clause in this run. Its commitment, argument, premise or application limit remains part of the source; omission here does not refute it or waive its responsibilities.", - "reason_zh": "本轮未提供该子句的保真编码或证明。其承诺、论据、前提或适用限制仍属于源文；未编码不等于反驳或免除其责任。", - "review_stage": "source_inventory_no_source_proof" - } - ], - "limits": "Bindings and reported judgments only. Code initial review had automatic workflow context; source initial review disclosed limited historical ACTIVE summary exposure. Round2 reviews are informed; they are not new blind trials." -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md deleted file mode 100644 index fab352a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-current.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `cb99ad55a0e4dad0f45f74ef91d279313333a2571a48e0d3856670ad2734272b`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 第二轮：两个修订对应的独立复评 - -日期：2026-09-13。仅复评c-83-c2和r-121-c4；旧初评、第一轮比较及其四项拒绝判断全部保留，不改写历史。本轮两个新版本均判断partial，详见mapped-judgments-round2.json中的逐条双语理由。c-89-c2和c-94-c3没有修正相关语义，继续rejected。 - -## 新证据与判断变化 - -c-83-c2：SelfAssessingSystem现在实际持有ownPrinciple和samples，runOwnAssessment确实计算同一所属谓词在自身样本上的结果。sampleSystem的[1]通过而0反驳其普遍正确，原先“只有名称、没有对象所属关系与实际考察”的缺口已在这个狭窄解释中补足。因此由rejected改为partial。仍没有形成/修订、适用条件、对评估规则本身的评估或全部反身性；不能从这个实例宣称任何自评都失败或自评永远不能支持正确结论。 - -r-121-c4：删除updateInvalidating实现修复示例，新增originalStates/revisedStates和实际compareReads。direct与cachedRead不变，修订的是比较状态集合，结果保留(10,10)并加入(11,10)，与本句的评估范围修订有直接有限对应。因此由rejected改为partial。它只是一个静态案例与一个变化案例，未建模一般测试运行器、任意序列、并发或所有回归案例。 - -## 自选实际边界变体 - -所有源码快照、探针、完整重跑命令、首次失败和实际输出保存在reader-round2-probes/。不是仅列计划或手动推断。 - -1. Core：把samples改为空列表，runOwnAssessment返回true，但所属谓词仍在0处为假；把samples改为[1,0]返回false；另建恒真所属谓词，测试返回true且能证明全部输入正确。四个实际输出为(true,true,false,true)，顺序为空样本、原实例、含反例样本、恒真原则。通过可以空泛，也可以与错误或正确并存，是否有实质支持仍需要解释采样和主张范围。 -2. Rationale：compareReads在空状态列表输出[]，仅initial输出[(10,10)]，加入updateOnly initial 10仍只有相同对，真实revisedStates输出[(10,10),(11,10)]。另实际证明initial属于revisedStates。评估修订的可见贡献依赖加入相关变化，不由列表更长或“revised”名称保证。 - -这些边界不要求扩大公布模型。它们要求公布措辞保留“选定非空实例”“加入11这一相关变化”“有限反例/有限比较”，不把样本通过说成完整自评能力，也不把任意新增案例说成改进。 - -## 实际运行与限制 - -首次尝试在两个工程执行lake env lean并导入模块，均因工程搜索路径无对应olean返回1；Lake同时自动创建了此前不存在的lake-manifest.json。未假装首次运行通过。随后将所读完整源码快照与探针体拼接成两个独立Lean文件，使用固定Lean4.33.1二进制检查，均返回0并输出上述结果。这同时检查了源声明与新探针，无需依赖一个未知的新旧构建产物。实际结果含恢复过程和快照hash。 - -本轮未修改维护源码、run.json、原初评或第一轮判断。除Lake自动生成manifest外，新增文件仅在忽略的P下。无需重复已通过探针；后续若文稿宣称超出上述范围，应作为新的具体措辞/对应问题审查。没有full判断或哲学正确性认证。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index 19ae64a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-comparison-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,34 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `37695a48276f635e264f19ccc07bef559600946518835eef37029ab18c7b3a1d`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# 原文初评与已披露编码比较 - -日期：2026-09-13。比较者：reader_source_initial。本轮是在source-initial.md和source-inventory.json冻结后进行的知情比较；不修改两份初评文件。基线仍为Core 0.1.3英文正本及当前rationale。已读取两个run.json、两个完整Lean源文件、encoding-preregistration.md，以及两份entry-data的全部映射条目。输入hash单独保存在comparison-input-hashes.json。 - -## 判断 - -16个已映射源子句中，12项支持有限对应（partial），4项拒绝当前对应（rejected）。另记录15项实质未编码内容为pending，108项结构或表格角色/名称为not_applicable。无full判断。mapped-judgments.json提供逐项英文及中文理由，id使用clause_id；clause=null则使用entry_id。未列出的实质主张应由汇总者明确标为pending并说明没有编码，不能因为条目缺席视为通过。 - -构建与依赖审计通过是调用者披露的机械结果；本轮未重复构建。所有保真判断来自实际定义、完整定理陈述与源文对应，不来自build状态。没有把未建模判为哲学缺陷。 - -## 四项当前对应应撤回或修订 - -1. c-89-c2：ObservationComplete只表示列表覆盖全部自然数，不含观测结果、主张、根据和支持关系。因此observation_gap及真假结论并列定理均不能表示“根据支持与主张强度/范围相称”。尤其真结论n+0=n已有独立证明，不能因列表未覆盖全部自然数称它支持不足；反过来只有输入覆盖也不保证观测内容为真或相关。预注册的“coverage sufficiency criterion”并未以证据与结论的关系实现，而且若被视为一般充分支持会改变原义。最小修正是撤回这四项对c-89-c2的映射，保留未映射的算术/覆盖示例；若要重新映射，需要明确的仅凭观测记录的蕴涵模型及额外假设，不能以名称补足。 -2. c-94-c3：unrelated_grounds_rejected仅因bothExamined要求grounds=3而拒绝4，证明的是记录编号不匹配。它没有实现“考察那些根据是否支持相应主张”。允许examined作为外部关系的条件化接口，不等于具体编号等式已经有考察语义。应撤回对这句实质考察责任的映射，保留编号完整性探针。c-94-c5/c6可保留为条件化责任分配和分类标签无免责效力的有限接口。 -3. c-83-c2：self_assessment_not_correctness是样本1通过、输入0失败的局部测试反例。没有系统、它的评估原则或将同一评估原则用于自身的行为；selfAssessmentSamples只是名称。应撤回当前自评对应，或建立有解释依据的自评对象与行为实例。这个算术结果可有限说明局部通过不能保证普遍正确，但后者不等同于原文的反身对象关系。 -4. r-121-c4：invalidation_restores_fixture修改了实现，令acknowledged与cached同步；原文此句说修订评估方法，比较两个候选的update–read序列并保留静态案例。不能把修复实现当成修订评估方法。最小修正是将映射改为实际update_read_counterexample加original_comparison/unchanged_update_retained，并仍标partial；正向失效更新实例可保留为额外候选示例，不能凭它证明测试集合保留或评估流程已形式化。 - -## 有限成立之处及保留界限 - -- 实际类型叫Aspect，具有empirical/inferential/value三个构造子，源码没有Kind声明。这是应用预设分类而非完整认识论分类的证明。Duties保留同一claim/grounds对及每个实际适用面的责任；mixed_projection只是由已假设的Duties投影，不构成外部责任已履行的证据。bothExamined及empiricalOnly是编号/标签记录，未实现经验考察的不确定性、推论支持关系或价值批评责任。标签遗漏反例能说明该接口的责任不随labels变化，不能证明真实适用分类已穷尽。 -- Consistent的整个held列表可产生联合后果，p/pImpliesQ/notQ确实触发一个context的正反结论；撤回及不同context示例提供有限对应。context把问题/假设/含义/范围折叠，推论关系是一个预设实例而非通用逻辑系统。ChangeReported只在实质撤回实例中对应明确；一般List不等会把重排或重复也视为变化，不能泛称语义变化判定器。 -- R1：namedUniversalTruth明确为h:P推出P，不是无条件普遍真理。0≤1与被2反驳的∀n,n≤1构成条件/量词改变的具体反例，支持“证明这个陈述不能自动建立另一个陈述”的有限说明。different_statement_refuted确实断言这个选定更强命题为假；这可以是具体见证，但中文英文解释均须避免提升为“凡对应失败，散文主张必假”。未编码一般证明可靠性、任意编码对应或哲学承诺的真假。r-77-c1与c4仍未映射。 -- 软件初态10/10、预算6下时延5/2均合格；updateOnly改为11后缓存仍10，直接读取11。它们实现源案例的一个明确反例，未建模真实时延、并发或全部故障。budget3是另一情境，预算定理仅覆盖r-119-c2合取义务的时延部分，新鲜度责任仍未表达。 -- 当前rationale.L120（r-120-c2至c6）没有任何声明映射，旧method-stage对应已撤回；这是正确保留缺口。此处的Grounds/Consistency/Reflexivity/可审查性推论不能由算术状态定理替代。r-119-c1与r-120-c1等“Additional premises”“Inference”只是表格角色，已标not_applicable。 - -## 范围与自检 - -本轮对所有16个已映射子句逐项检查了实际声明；未宣称全部未映射子句已做同等深度编码评审。结构、表格角色名称与实质论断分开，源文仍完整保留。模型失败不改写原文；既有初评与hash不变。判断标准没有因作者声明“checked”或“limited”而降低，partial也不意味着完整子句已被证明。有限接口可作为可读实例；错误的直接对应应修正而不是仅靠总体免责声明稀释。 - -没有必要递归委派或重跑相同构建。后续仅需比较有实质变化的映射/编码和文稿陈述，并分别保留原判与新判。未执行维护文件修改或哲学采用。 diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md deleted file mode 100644 index 90b1632..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/source-initial.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,47 +0,0 @@ -# Public review record - -This is a path-redacted export of a retained review, not a new blind assessment. The initial records precede candidate comparison; later code/source updates are explicitly informed. Original SHA256: `5a292830b2fdb6e0670049bf56bbb278416fd2418272e4d586bd8f0f904386b8`. Only machine paths and private-location links were removed. - -# Independent source-only initial assessment — frozen - -Date: 2026-09-13. Reviewer: reader_source_initial. This record precedes disclosure of any current candidate encoding, author verdict, or expected comparison result. Selected baseline: `OrganonCore/PHILOSOPHY.md` philosophy/core 0.1.3, English authority. Companion: `OrganonCore/docs/rationale.md`, non-normative. Goal supplied by caller: faithful limited Lean formalization and two-granularity English/Chinese explanations covering the 22 Core text units and the complete rationale. No candidate has been assessed here, and this is not an adoption judgment. - -## Provenance and limits of independence - -Read the supplied Core AGENTS, PHILOSOPHY and rationale in full; RTK instructions; assess, principled-review, wording-review, shared iteration and philosophy-resolution instructions; translation guidance. No candidate code, author rationale, prior detailed review, blind translation, or archive package was opened. AGENTS instructed starting local records from ACTIVE.md; reading that index incidentally exposed one-line historical task summaries, including an earlier description of Assessment as an accepted conditional normative interface. Those summaries are not source evidence and are not used to determine this judgment. This limited exposure prevents claiming complete ignorance of historical verdict metadata. Exact source clauses, not that summary, ground the distinctions below. No recursive delegation occurred. - -## Initial judgment and expected fidelity boundaries - -The source supports a limited formal interpretation of selected responsibility and support relations, if the interpretation explicitly preserves normative force, applicability, and the distinction between supporting a claim and examining its support. It does not supply a complete formal ontology, inference calculus, support metric, or source-to-model correspondence proof. The success of a Lean check could establish an encoded statement under its assumptions; its relevance to the prose remains a separate judgment. Unknown correspondence is not a pass, a core conflict, or proof that the source is defective. - -1. Core preamble: adopted commitments, meanings, and application limits constitute the authority; they are not descriptive laws of every system. Charter and Grounds mutually constrain each other without priority or deductive hierarchy. Rationale and contextual skill requirements must retain their separate status. -2. Self-Transcendence: expansion is valued, not merely allowed. Organization, methods and principles remain revisable. Orientation, permission, actual change and supported achievement are different. Universal nonfinality within the relevant existing forms does not impose change on every action, guarantee progress, exclude justified stability, or demand independence from external help. -3. Internal Consistency: preserve simultaneous holding and implications, same question, assumptions, meanings and scope. Changing or withdrawing a judgment may remove co-holding; concealed redefinition cannot erase a prior contradiction. Tension is not yet contradiction. Compatibility cannot stand for correctness, adequacy or inferential entailment. -4. Reflexivity: both system and formation/application/revision of principles are assessment and generation objects, subject to their applicable conditions. No self exemption when conditions hold, no unconditional application of every principle to itself. Self-application and internally produced revision do not establish correctness or sufficient grounds. -5. Grounds and Assessment: articulability identifies concepts, assumptions, reasons and limits. Assessment examines whether those grounds support the corresponding claim; completing it may establish insufficient support. It must not be encoded as an obligation to obtain a successful support verdict, nor as a completed marker lacking claim/grounds/conditions correspondence. Each applicable mixed aspect retains its responsibility even without a classification tag. Empirical assessment examines evidence/performance plus support conditions, scope and uncertainty; inferential assessment examines assumptions and inferential relations; value assessment states position, reasons, limits and consequences and stays open to relevant criticism. An initial value commitment need not prove every starting assumption. The general proportionate-support constraint limits claims; it does not guarantee all assessed claims are supported. -6. Scope and tools: local agreement cannot establish unconditional universals or absence of omitted differences. Measurement, repetition and frameworks can be useful but form no universally mandatory chain. A verifiable unreproduced observation may offer limited support; stochastic output identity and stability of conclusions are different. -7. Capability claims: application-specific definitions and conditions determine the actual claim. External evidence may support a capability without internal explanation; reliable output does not automatically establish understanding. An application may explicitly require explanation. Counts alone do not establish expansion. Narrowing a definition creates a new claim and cannot retroactively prove the old one. -8. Choice commitment: relevant reasons connect priority to objectives, values and constraints. Name, convention or status alone are insufficient; tradition may embody an explicitly adopted value with a relevant connection. This additional commitment is not derived merely from grouping it under Grounds. Openness does not imply equivalence, multiple feasible means, mandatory novelty, or rejection of established methods. Internal method properties may matter. -9. Relationships and terms: retain all foregoing distinctions under mutual application; no self-proof follows. “Assessment” includes reasons, applicability and observed performance and is not limited to executable tests. Read that list with the type-appropriate assessment responsibilities rather than silently making empirical outcome evidence mandatory for every claim type. -10. Rationale: preserve arguments’ premises, objections and limits, historical placement assertions as assertions of this text, and all illustrative cases. Removal checks concern loss of an explicit contribution, expressly not formal independence. Hypothetical research/software examples add contextual values and constraints; potential contributions and bounded support are not actual proof of domain-wide improvement. Repository tools, English authority, independent-first review and records are contextual arrangements rather than philosophical theorems. -11. Formal-proof example (rationale line 77): the hypothesis includes a checked proof whose encoding changes the claim’s conditions or claim-to-grounds relation. Its encoded statement is established relative to assumptions and proof dependencies, but this does not thereby establish the different prose claim. Correspondence failure is initially a modeling finding, not itself a reason to revise the commitment. A formalization must keep checked derivation, source interpretation and support relevance separately reviewable. Non-entailment must not be replaced by falsity of the prose conclusion. - -## Questions not fixed by the source - -- “Intrinsic orientation when expansion is regarded as worth pursuing” supplies an intended meaning but no measurable criterion or complete equivalence schema. A model’s precise predicate/definition is an interpretation to disclose. -- Contradiction, relevant implications, and the admissible inference calculus are not algorithmically fixed. Selecting classical proposition logic, a finite claim domain, or a closure rule adds modeling choices. -- Proportionate support has no universal numerical or ordered scale in the text. Claim/grounds correspondence and sufficient support require interpreted relations and contextual evidence; their names alone cannot establish them. -- Applicable aspects are not supplied as an exhaustive classification algorithm. A finite aspect datatype can be a bounded application interface only if its coverage limits and unclassified cases are explicit. -- The Assessment terminology row does not define a formal selector for when observed-performance examination applies. Its claim-appropriate context rules out silently making empirical evidence a universal prerequisite; an exact selector remains an additional interpretation. -- The proof example contains no concrete model or correspondence test; it cannot determine an unseen candidate’s fidelity. The software example does not fully specify concurrency semantics or all workloads; the research example supplies no actual study results. These are bounded examples, not omissions to fill as source commitments. -- The rationale’s external simplicity-source attribution has been preserved but not independently fact-checked in this source-only task. No judgment about the external article’s accuracy is offered. - -These are interpretation and support boundaries, not established contradictions in the philosophy. None authorizes changing the adopted commitments. - -## Coverage and bounded self-check - -`source-inventory.json` preserves exact text and line numbers for every nonempty source line, including every paragraph, table row, heading, ID and metadata line. Each substantive entry has a source-specific initial reading of force, conditions, intended contribution and unresolved questions, plus first-pass clause splits and force/scope markers. Splitting is not a formal parse; nested semantic clauses can remain. Structural rows carry no independent philosophical obligations. The Core has exactly 22 stable IDs: 20 directly contain substantive text and two (`organon.charter`, `organon.relationships`) are structural groupings. They must not be populated with invented commitments merely to match a count. - -Actual checks: the inventory contains 202 exact nonempty lines (Core 99; rationale 103), with 119 substantive paragraph/table entries. These are documentary coverage checks, not whole-text semantic-completeness certification. No model, proof, bilingual candidate or actual reader outcome was inspected. No claim is made about universal adequacy, formal independence, minimality, or philosophical truth. - -Bounded review of this record: consistency checked by keeping responsibilities separate from successful outcomes and current commitments separate from contextual methods; completeness is limited to the supplied source and first-pass clause readings; external adequacy of hypothetical cases cannot be inferred without actual evidence; a concrete correspondence counterexample can revise a later candidate judgment; a static inventory need not display a system’s generative orientation; no comparative parsimony advantage is claimed without a comparable alternative. An initial inventory is useful as a traceable baseline, not sufficient as fidelity evidence. Stop here until candidate disclosure supplies new evidence. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md deleted file mode 100644 index 582c09a..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/reviews/summary.en.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,31 +0,0 @@ -# Reported source fidelity - -These are reported semantic judgments, not kernel conclusions. Initial records precede comparison; revised mappings have informed follow-up judgments. Two rejected attempts have editorial current-result wording; their original independent reasons and verdicts remain in the initial comparison export. The bound records and exact object hashes are listed in fidelity.json. Unmodeled entries remain pending; structure is not a philosophical theorem. - -## r-77-c2 — partial - -namedUniversalTruth proves P from the explicit premise h:P; encoded_statement separately proves 0≤1. These correctly illustrate conditional derivation and a checked statement. They do not prove Lean soundness for every dependency or that an arbitrary prose encoding corresponds to its source. The theorem name supplies no stronger claim. - -## r-77-c3 — partial - -The arithmetic witness has a true bounded statement 0≤1 and a false stronger universal statement forall n,n≤1 (counterexample 2). It establishes that proving the former need not establish the latter in this selected condition-change example. General correspondence failure is not equivalent to falsity of the prose claim; the source also allows an unsupported but true prose claim. No philosophical commitment is refuted. - -## r-119-c2 — partial - -budget_change_is_distinct demonstrates that latencies 5/2 satisfy budget 6 but not budget 3, a separate hypothetical context. The mapped theorem contains no freshness requirement or subsequent-read ordering, so it illustrates only sensitivity to a stated budget and does not encode the combined service obligation. - -## r-119-c5 — partial - -original_comparison directly checks equal answers at initial acknowledged/cached 10 and both fixed latencies within budget 6. It is a faithful concrete unchanged-data fixture; a single state and stipulated latencies do not reproduce an actual comparison study or a workload-wide measurement result. - -## r-121-c2 — partial - -The initial outputs agree; after updateOnly to 11, direct reads 11 and cachedRead remains 10, and input 11 refutes the modeled universal cache-freshness claim. Combined with original_comparison this realizes the stated local counterexample. Acknowledgment is represented by a state field/update convention, with no concurrent execution or real measurements. - -## r-121-c3 — partial - -A concrete pair agrees at the initial state and differs after the acknowledged-value update. This supplies a witness against inferring equality at all relevant states from the original local equality. Overall equivalence across costs, failures and other effects is not modeled. - -## r-121-c4 — partial - -compareReads now evaluates the unchanged direct/cachedRead candidates over originalStates=[initial] and revisedStates=[initial,updateOnly initial 11]; the computed result retains (10,10) and adds (11,10). This supplies the previously missing revision of the comparison inputs rather than an implementation repair. Independent probes confirm empty/initial-only/same-value-update inputs do not reveal the mismatch, so the contribution depends on including the relevant changed-data state. The model still uses preconstructed sequential states and one unchanged case, not a general evaluation workflow, real execution, concurrency or complete regression suite. diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json deleted file mode 100644 index 8e0b2c1..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/run.json +++ /dev/null @@ -1,4119 +0,0 @@ -{ - "schema_version": 1, - "source": { - "kind": "text", - "path": "snapshots/source.md", - "snapshot": "snapshots/source.md", - "sha256": "5500596a134873f5d0bc96d669ba06a3d60e63a4577bbc2c840cb3a308c50f44", - "spans": [ - { - "id": "rationale.L1", - "start_line": 1, - "end_line": 1 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L2", - "start_line": 2, - "end_line": 2 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L3", - "start_line": 3, - "end_line": 3 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L4", - "start_line": 4, - "end_line": 4 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L5", - "start_line": 5, - "end_line": 5 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L6", - "start_line": 6, - "end_line": 6 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L7", - "start_line": 7, - "end_line": 7 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L8", - "start_line": 8, - "end_line": 8 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L9", - "start_line": 9, - "end_line": 9 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L10", - "start_line": 10, - "end_line": 10 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L11", - "start_line": 11, - "end_line": 11 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L12", - "start_line": 12, - "end_line": 12 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L13", - "start_line": 13, - "end_line": 13 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L14", - "start_line": 14, - "end_line": 14 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L15", - "start_line": 15, - "end_line": 15 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L16", - "start_line": 16, - "end_line": 16 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L17", - "start_line": 17, - "end_line": 17 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L18", - "start_line": 18, - "end_line": 18 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L19", - "start_line": 19, - "end_line": 19 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L20", - "start_line": 20, - "end_line": 20 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L21", - "start_line": 21, - "end_line": 21 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L22", - "start_line": 22, - "end_line": 22 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L23", - "start_line": 23, - "end_line": 23 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L24", - "start_line": 24, - "end_line": 24 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L25", - "start_line": 25, - "end_line": 25 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L26", - "start_line": 26, - "end_line": 26 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L27", - "start_line": 27, - "end_line": 27 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L28", - "start_line": 28, - "end_line": 28 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L29", - "start_line": 29, - "end_line": 29 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L30", - "start_line": 30, - "end_line": 30 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L31", - "start_line": 31, - "end_line": 31 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L32", - "start_line": 32, - "end_line": 32 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L33", - "start_line": 33, - "end_line": 33 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L34", - "start_line": 34, - "end_line": 34 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L35", - "start_line": 35, - "end_line": 35 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L36", - "start_line": 36, - "end_line": 36 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L37", - "start_line": 37, - "end_line": 37 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L38", - "start_line": 38, - "end_line": 38 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L39", - "start_line": 39, - "end_line": 39 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L40", - "start_line": 40, - "end_line": 40 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L41", - "start_line": 41, - "end_line": 41 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L42", - "start_line": 42, - "end_line": 42 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L43", - "start_line": 43, - "end_line": 43 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L44", - "start_line": 44, - "end_line": 44 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L45", - "start_line": 45, - "end_line": 45 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L46", - "start_line": 46, - "end_line": 46 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L47", - "start_line": 47, - "end_line": 47 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L48", - "start_line": 48, - "end_line": 48 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L49", - "start_line": 49, - "end_line": 49 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L50", - "start_line": 50, - "end_line": 50 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L51", - "start_line": 51, - "end_line": 51 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L52", - "start_line": 52, - "end_line": 52 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L53", - "start_line": 53, - "end_line": 53 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L54", - "start_line": 54, - "end_line": 54 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L55", - "start_line": 55, - "end_line": 55 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L56", - "start_line": 56, - "end_line": 56 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L57", - "start_line": 57, - "end_line": 57 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L58", - "start_line": 58, - "end_line": 58 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L59", - "start_line": 59, - "end_line": 59 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L60", - "start_line": 60, - "end_line": 60 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L61", - "start_line": 61, - "end_line": 61 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L62", - "start_line": 62, - "end_line": 62 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L63", - "start_line": 63, - "end_line": 63 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L64", - "start_line": 64, - "end_line": 64 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L65", - "start_line": 65, - "end_line": 65 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L66", - "start_line": 66, - "end_line": 66 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L67", - "start_line": 67, - "end_line": 67 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L68", - "start_line": 68, - "end_line": 68 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L69", - "start_line": 69, - "end_line": 69 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L70", - "start_line": 70, - "end_line": 70 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L71", - "start_line": 71, - "end_line": 71 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L72", - "start_line": 72, - "end_line": 72 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L73", - "start_line": 73, - "end_line": 73 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L74", - "start_line": 74, - "end_line": 74 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L75", - "start_line": 75, - "end_line": 75 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L76", - "start_line": 76, - "end_line": 76 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L77", - "start_line": 77, - "end_line": 77 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L78", - "start_line": 78, - "end_line": 78 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L79", - "start_line": 79, - "end_line": 79 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L80", - "start_line": 80, - "end_line": 80 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L81", - "start_line": 81, - "end_line": 81 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L82", - "start_line": 82, - "end_line": 82 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L83", - "start_line": 83, - "end_line": 83 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L84", - "start_line": 84, - "end_line": 84 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L85", - "start_line": 85, - "end_line": 85 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L86", - "start_line": 86, - "end_line": 86 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L87", - "start_line": 87, - "end_line": 87 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L88", - "start_line": 88, - "end_line": 88 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L89", - "start_line": 89, - "end_line": 89 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L90", - "start_line": 90, - "end_line": 90 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L91", - "start_line": 91, - "end_line": 91 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L92", - "start_line": 92, - "end_line": 92 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L93", - "start_line": 93, - "end_line": 93 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L94", - "start_line": 94, - "end_line": 94 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L95", - "start_line": 95, - "end_line": 95 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L96", - "start_line": 96, - "end_line": 96 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L97", - "start_line": 97, - "end_line": 97 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L98", - "start_line": 98, - "end_line": 98 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L99", - "start_line": 99, - "end_line": 99 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L100", - "start_line": 100, - "end_line": 100 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L101", - "start_line": 101, - "end_line": 101 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L102", - "start_line": 102, - "end_line": 102 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L103", - "start_line": 103, - "end_line": 103 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L104", - "start_line": 104, - "end_line": 104 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L105", - "start_line": 105, - "end_line": 105 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L106", - "start_line": 106, - "end_line": 106 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L107", - "start_line": 107, - "end_line": 107 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L108", - "start_line": 108, - "end_line": 108 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L109", - "start_line": 109, - "end_line": 109 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L110", - "start_line": 110, - "end_line": 110 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L111", - "start_line": 111, - "end_line": 111 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L112", - "start_line": 112, - "end_line": 112 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L113", - "start_line": 113, - "end_line": 113 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L114", - "start_line": 114, - "end_line": 114 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L115", - "start_line": 115, - "end_line": 115 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L116", - "start_line": 116, - "end_line": 116 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L117", - "start_line": 117, - "end_line": 117 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L118", - "start_line": 118, - "end_line": 118 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L119", - "start_line": 119, - "end_line": 119 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L120", - "start_line": 120, - "end_line": 120 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L121", - "start_line": 121, - "end_line": 121 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L122", - "start_line": 122, - "end_line": 122 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L123", - "start_line": 123, - "end_line": 123 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L124", - "start_line": 124, - "end_line": 124 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L125", - "start_line": 125, - "end_line": 125 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L126", - "start_line": 126, - "end_line": 126 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L127", - "start_line": 127, - "end_line": 127 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L128", - "start_line": 128, - "end_line": 128 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L129", - "start_line": 129, - "end_line": 129 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L130", - "start_line": 130, - "end_line": 130 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L131", - "start_line": 131, - "end_line": 131 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L132", - "start_line": 132, - "end_line": 132 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L133", - "start_line": 133, - "end_line": 133 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L134", - "start_line": 134, - "end_line": 134 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L135", - "start_line": 135, - "end_line": 135 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L136", - "start_line": 136, - "end_line": 136 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L137", - "start_line": 137, - "end_line": 137 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L138", - "start_line": 138, - "end_line": 138 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L139", - "start_line": 139, - "end_line": 139 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L140", - "start_line": 140, - "end_line": 140 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L141", - "start_line": 141, - "end_line": 141 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L142", - "start_line": 142, - "end_line": 142 - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L143", - "start_line": 143, - "end_line": 143 - } - ] - }, - "baseline": { - "path": "snapshots/philosophy.md", - "sha256": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59" - }, - "project": { - "path": "leanified", - "root_module": "RationaleReader" - }, - "preregistration": { - "path": "PREREGISTERED.md", - "sha256": "566dbb98e64acce0e25f454c5a890a4280eff60d3684b5f54b1164933804c263" - }, - "units": [ - { - "id": "rationale.L1", - "hash": "668bd85fe9333136585e10f0e60b8c8ba9874339f02ff9a898100740ef667911", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L2", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L3", - "hash": "ad826599dd9c4823c6f4da3473007466ed8045ffac78c0ce3e87b1f6af9db71f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-3-c1", - "claim": "This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md).", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-3-c2", - "claim": "It does not add obligations to the philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L4", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L5", - "hash": "933206925f71146455d8760979780a1814daf1bf3f3b68669d6886144aa4cf39", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-5-c1", - "claim": "Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c2", - "claim": "Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-5-c3", - "claim": "These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L6", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L7", - "hash": "1bb070e084f72137aae08f7d2a3228e65ab1f3560fd2d5b695cd6510e7cb4482", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L8", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L9", - "hash": "a2b4be57c7012269f0deee93cd0edac15dbe1326811e1fb80630d8e06f1a145e", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L10", - "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L11", - "hash": "d8934747ef3c4954c1f9fefac077bf7759a7db534925c7cbd0a47cad9c5bc628", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-11-c1", - "claim": "Generative Drive", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c2", - "claim": "Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c3", - "claim": "Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-11-c4", - "claim": "The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L12", - "hash": "fc352316bffb248c160fd69ab1e7d62e01ea00642b42decf19533f06f52be332", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-12-c1", - "claim": "Internal Consistency and Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c2", - "claim": "Charter, unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-12-c3", - "claim": "Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L13", - "hash": "64dc35ddf7c1b69b6502a0b95a0ce6711d8804d4129d7bc0b8c2cb94434906b8", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-13-c1", - "claim": "Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c2", - "claim": "Grounds, §§2.1–2.2.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c3", - "claim": "General requirements and limits retain their normative force.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-13-c4", - "claim": "The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L14", - "hash": "6ec509bc8e9f620401d647d5b8cf35db37d1674381ce4bdf9b1e3aa350a41147", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-14-c1", - "claim": "Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c2", - "claim": "Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c3", - "claim": "The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c4", - "claim": "Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-14-c5", - "claim": "This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L15", - "hash": "33dd9009f48f10241df168f0e3ada08f65a9a7a5309bda69c9ed824fc89e5fb1", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-15-c1", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c2", - "claim": "Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c3", - "claim": "The provision and its conditions remain.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-15-c4", - "claim": "Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L16", - "hash": "a20144da74b67b2f7c25541e9381865ea0285c5e97bb11f5ebbb8650607316ec", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-16-c1", - "claim": "Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c2", - "claim": "Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c3", - "claim": "Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-16-c4", - "claim": "Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L17", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L18", - "hash": "0d2c5939153425a76718e06122f904b1b653e5af24773db35bf231c649bd64be", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L19", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L20", - "hash": "10e99d9b3033fd80bd581c2dc6f260117fb39cdc25bb28899ecda49547d1044d", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L21", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L22", - "hash": "f6c7a606497eeba271c0b761217514e29a1e70864b2ec1724ee865d906d1984d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-22-c1", - "claim": "The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-22-c2", - "claim": "These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L23", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L24", - "hash": "4db25dd21eb92434839476950d6a589b560b838d158a6f37432e579a93498277", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L25", - "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L26", - "hash": "4d733c002221ee21e690a9bcca04d9276ff557753449c198c311d1b34e18c8b2", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-26-c1", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c2", - "claim": "Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c3", - "claim": "This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c4", - "claim": "Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c5", - "claim": "The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-26-c6", - "claim": "Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L27", - "hash": "7ec531fba287156ba76b2070628042acacf423fe0581dbf8140dddfbe96f21f5", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-27-c1", - "claim": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c2", - "claim": "If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c3", - "claim": "This supports examining their compatibility.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c4", - "claim": "A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c5", - "claim": "Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-27-c6", - "claim": "consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L28", - "hash": "104f17b3c4e74001954f65b69355285be10952500665db7a3942518bf3fca9a7", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-28-c1", - "claim": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c2", - "claim": "A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c3", - "claim": "Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c4", - "claim": "Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-28-c5", - "claim": "Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L29", - "hash": "9b975b7dfee313d6043210278c43082d5ea40f1807151914f75e0271a7831d13", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-29-c1", - "claim": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c2", - "claim": "When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c3", - "claim": "Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c4", - "claim": "Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c5", - "claim": "Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-29-c6", - "claim": "Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L30", - "hash": "60dfe4217d1b52aeb34ac2bc7c8e03726de3cfea0211071621ab67882a5010b6", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-30-c1", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c2", - "claim": "If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c3", - "claim": "This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c4", - "claim": "Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c5", - "claim": "They are not disallowed;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c6", - "claim": "the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-30-c7", - "claim": "This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L31", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L32", - "hash": "7bd2325aee0016fe97093cf4b61f6d4e88f5c936634bdc65d962aae7c1f9f023", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-32-c1", - "claim": "These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c2", - "claim": "Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-32-c3", - "claim": "Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L33", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L34", - "hash": "4f95bac5ab551be9fd41ea7fc3ad10572ccb52fbd1d19bfcf9343cf39d088c7f", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L35", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L36", - "hash": "caecbd85b600c05f99dc18fbe500ec0fa0d74a822d0176705f36c53c2a9ced42", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-36-c1", - "claim": "The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c2", - "claim": "The current core withdraws that uniform definition.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-36-c3", - "claim": "Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L37", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L38", - "hash": "3084747debf7e38f69282b9b532621addcacffd10c009dec2cb9f95954e1ba6f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-38-c1", - "claim": "External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c2", - "claim": "Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c3", - "claim": "An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c4", - "claim": "Revising a definition changes the claim assessed;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-38-c5", - "claim": "it cannot retroactively establish the former claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L39", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L40", - "hash": "b742a99069acca5a23c8ec56c693abce7a1e1728198d1b51942b150ee531ec9a", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-40-c1", - "claim": "This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c2", - "claim": "That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c3", - "claim": "A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c4", - "claim": "it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-40-c5", - "claim": "Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L41", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L42", - "hash": "54ce34ba230563cb8db3a9d289f2885d832a4be6c8b529c4290931acc9af4539", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L43", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L44", - "hash": "8d921274a86253145b291eb4cfe6f2fef248cdbcb75f3a73dbcb15a1014efe77", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-44-c1", - "claim": "Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c2", - "claim": "For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c3", - "claim": "Each choice needs contextual reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-44-c4", - "claim": "These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L45", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L46", - "hash": "0969d78f72a5158e5919c3080500387669843f5943df3bed5311fb4bd7738fb5", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L47", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L48", - "hash": "956e6fb12b6542adeb84076c891c5ab09ba7f88dab7b22646d5d9507e1c03402", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-48-c1", - "claim": "The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c2", - "claim": "Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c3", - "claim": "That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c4", - "claim": "The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c5", - "claim": "Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c6", - "claim": "Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c7", - "claim": "a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-48-c8", - "claim": "Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L49", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L50", - "hash": "4d79c7f3c7bd14f32048975a1b9a0c1433c844f9fe539c685358a4d2cbb80bb4", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-50-c1", - "claim": "This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c2", - "claim": "The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c3", - "claim": "It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c4", - "claim": "These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-50-c5", - "claim": "The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L51", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L52", - "hash": "219687b5a4e6c926ff365d2a134a4226abccb611eebab018d9ebfc3584519f45", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L53", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L54", - "hash": "d320e60399c0b9843ac2f0de83386507fa4764b1757074e1da6b31bebcf5afe6", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L55", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L56", - "hash": "90bede4baa976c2860cc3d797dafff40c4e15f554cc59af21b65482b3c87fd16", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-56-c1", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c2", - "claim": "The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-56-c3", - "claim": "Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L57", - "hash": "d2dee07dcb1ca840a7c35759fd404e8d2346755654e1d7f251642973eebf9707", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-57-c1", - "claim": "Internal Consistency", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c2", - "claim": "There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c3", - "claim": "Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-57-c4", - "claim": "Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L58", - "hash": "b0fb2e922a98a434f3c9f9c4afa09af4846ff800d6889531d295794d6cfc2f53", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-58-c1", - "claim": "Reflexivity", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c2", - "claim": "Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-58-c3", - "claim": "Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L59", - "hash": "34c086a824bfecf228d405a148c44f230210c79794cf9764c1292384a3b8cf06", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-59-c1", - "claim": "Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-59-c2", - "claim": "The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L60", - "hash": "66993b06fa3e0dd680c60855e9af72b9113891a9cd3a2c1992d6def1df3824a7", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-60-c1", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-60-c2", - "claim": "General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L61", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L62", - "hash": "c256b08ffa732f5cc51ab5b41f740f1e743265bf5ad18d41db6528f031501112", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-62-c1", - "claim": "The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c2", - "claim": "it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-62-c3", - "claim": "A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L63", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L64", - "hash": "97ea786d926fd96056444883a1f73b0a3b108a21a818a0645ee7134af8da6df6", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L65", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L66", - "hash": "959e57241616b828d745e9543ad85c23a61c61d40b4227100d90290c04be22d3", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-66-c1", - "claim": "The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c2", - "claim": "These examine the meaning of the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-66-c3", - "claim": "they are not steps a system is required to execute.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L67", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L68", - "hash": "08bba0cf1b4b7f09de11a7016ac2810937bfc30ad715e2ebd61f51dec37312bc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L69", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L70", - "hash": "d65dd61903b76beb1fa93aad45a57fec2a635d2ee37eb7292435ac2af4f1cd72", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-70-c1", - "claim": "A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c2", - "claim": "Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-70-c3", - "claim": "Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L71", - "hash": "9972b6b0bf412fff29e447fe06b3e6b2932b934b9a744bfc778829bb84cc9a21", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-71-c1", - "claim": "A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c2", - "claim": "Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-71-c3", - "claim": "Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L72", - "hash": "02440fc300df44cd58d415aee41cbb59a978afe13063800d557e89447386eb80", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-72-c1", - "claim": "A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-72-c2", - "claim": "It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L73", - "hash": "e52fc5d72d8a8e5240d82ff6a9da9c8b8bd8c3dcb91d5035c06bffe78e7ec2fe", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-73-c1", - "claim": "Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c2", - "claim": "Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-73-c3", - "claim": "Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L74", - "hash": "330240dd017f8fb690210ec66d2f44682dedd7fe0ee969808defaa02d6ec2fff", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-74-c1", - "claim": "Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c2", - "claim": "This violates internal consistency.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-74-c3", - "claim": "Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L75", - "hash": "34d2d80a9996f9a065f46778808cbee005a7b77295f3efbabe2be92d58d6691e", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-75-c1", - "claim": "A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-75-c2", - "claim": "This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L76", - "hash": "1b793e1a674cf4080b93166a9bca2a9c24ef26666f7a503a19859ee0bc9afc5f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-76-c1", - "claim": "Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c2", - "claim": "Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-76-c3", - "claim": "Grounds requires examination of the support relation.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L77", - "hash": "10590990e1fc3a0cf3b9f6cdb6b96c4b3abd6ec2cb73e2377029c7f0def14147", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-77-c1", - "claim": "A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c2", - "claim": "The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "RationaleReader.encoded_statement" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c3", - "claim": "it does not thereby establish the different prose claim.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-77-c4", - "claim": "A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L78", - "hash": "6c62f4450d99d1a9b366578fb0a0ebcbe7b5b425528a155ebfd2c942c9bfa785", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-78-c1", - "claim": "A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c2", - "claim": "It can be assessed as a value commitment.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-78-c3", - "claim": "Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L79", - "hash": "e3014b6415a9b7527a847c3f6002dcd314e40c09c7239010901b007dc5aa9e8b", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-79-c1", - "claim": "A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c2", - "claim": "It may provide corresponding limited support.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c3", - "claim": "Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-79-c4", - "claim": "it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L80", - "hash": "cd426a3981fb3ba3645ff82096d6315b30e720641eb99f7834fc73da985f9f80", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-80-c1", - "claim": "A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c2", - "claim": "Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-80-c3", - "claim": "The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L81", - "hash": "06c6debd51d024336dbd5aa0b2c875bbb6d120ddbe4416fde3bbcaa222d874fb", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-81-c1", - "claim": "An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c2", - "claim": "A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c3", - "claim": "The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-81-c4", - "claim": "These capability definitions come from the application.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L82", - "hash": "bb93f642fb73298469b8bdda629eeb8bad3e6ef890508aeb8ab3ff10068a574a", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-82-c1", - "claim": "An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c2", - "claim": "External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c3", - "claim": "Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-82-c4", - "claim": "The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L83", - "hash": "3014b78bbd73a9a3c3098f25c106b585383159d8343c6c3e5622aa4ee23f20e1", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-83-c1", - "claim": "An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c2", - "claim": "the same reliable black box cannot do so.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c3", - "claim": "Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-83-c4", - "claim": "Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L84", - "hash": "252c6f68ef0367566b5e8601f7a0c3c6c5dfd99c419ce2a99cfcd41b8d621d93", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-84-c1", - "claim": "After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-84-c2", - "claim": "A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L85", - "hash": "25d5f39edd46da55f97c77bab39d04ce532ebc952429aa274c37f1fd00a2a447", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-85-c1", - "claim": "A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c2", - "claim": "The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-85-c3", - "claim": "Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L86", - "hash": "a89a03f362b14ddb4aec9f07e28b4d85b2ab1c7cdecce4b89697b613da1fc216", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-86-c1", - "claim": "An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c2", - "claim": "Conventional use is not the sole ground.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-86-c3", - "claim": "Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L87", - "hash": "2cbf8a89b4ef5c5a3cfa628fd8493b80ed9d35c4b2edfbdc65df3604b6543105", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-87-c1", - "claim": "An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c2", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-87-c3", - "claim": "It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L88", - "hash": "b264f91593e4db7ed87bbfe143b884e3e7fb20d5fcdc307e17f1e5cd98887275", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-88-c1", - "claim": "Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c2", - "claim": "This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-88-c3", - "claim": "A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L89", - "hash": "9cf12465a0d2877df26011bf4928d8012d8c4f9f8c1704b70e021be626c7f286", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-89-c1", - "claim": "A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c2", - "claim": "Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c3", - "claim": "Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-89-c4", - "claim": "Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L90", - "hash": "b07c68558cd24b774774fedfbe2c2f5d23b271f8b959c01de6783e1a2daf87ab", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-90-c1", - "claim": "An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c2", - "claim": "Renaming alone adds no support.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-90-c3", - "claim": "Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L91", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L92", - "hash": "bf74efa148a551eaead25cb8895b5207cfd52a8d2d6c70d798e0c693d87f83e7", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L93", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L94", - "hash": "8b3b778f715e4eb7b15c44cc8e67b68fc1832c1bd54931f280982b4c038783e2", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-94-c1", - "claim": "Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c2", - "claim": "Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c3", - "claim": "Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c4", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-94-c5", - "claim": "These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L95", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L96", - "hash": "30b8d3d4b3cb9d660d883ecbaf3074b06c83d5c53adc31d5d7086d31eb03cce9", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-96-c1", - "claim": "Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c2", - "claim": "Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c3", - "claim": "Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-96-c4", - "claim": "Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L97", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L98", - "hash": "310354454cd8435355c723922202d89db3646bd55f35a7181c4e2ef7eb8861fb", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-98-c1", - "claim": "Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c2", - "claim": "they cannot replace philosophical argument.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-98-c3", - "claim": "These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L99", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L100", - "hash": "e5f5c1d1062b410a6dff019830f7953c9f9be9c88d99b56f418e9948f6ad7266", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L101", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L102", - "hash": "23e1e3ad740c63761902d9f5baf0c0aad209c606fa300af6fe30ed55e7d64614", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-102-c1", - "claim": "The following are hypothetical applications.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c2", - "claim": "Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-102-c3", - "claim": "their conclusions hold within those premises.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L103", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L104", - "hash": "e60d62d099888e7cb4becb94299e9f5c56a2718e96e6a91760b15154b822e909", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L105", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L106", - "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L107", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L108", - "hash": "b12b979a32161cbcb910eef366c584d19c4419d2723be743732b5dae6d84bcea", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-108-c1", - "claim": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-108-c2", - "claim": "A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L109", - "hash": "51bf9cc2d774bb1de9100daabf3b5f8216a74e267d179297493f3b9d790cb1c8", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-109-c1", - "claim": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c2", - "claim": "The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c3", - "claim": "It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c4", - "claim": "The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-109-c5", - "claim": "the material does not establish population prevalence.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L110", - "hash": "bedd2dd62cfd2d9320697f56b83a739bafe561bc4da2645fcaf454f48256aa19", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-110-c1", - "claim": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c2", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c3", - "claim": "Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c4", - "claim": "Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c5", - "claim": "Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-110-c6", - "claim": "The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L111", - "hash": "b208a87be75c7f34d1a01445bb454de1ff40aa0c2000e7dad2b7ffd7f8bd09d5", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-111-c1", - "claim": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c2", - "claim": "An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c3", - "claim": "A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c4", - "claim": "A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c5", - "claim": "To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-111-c6", - "claim": "Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L112", - "hash": "2500d5a4b1a7c1c27c3a7de40300d8b17374efe517cc684f7b7d07e73650345e", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-112-c1", - "claim": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c2", - "claim": "The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c3", - "claim": "Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c4", - "claim": "An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c5", - "claim": "the number of labels alone cannot.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c6", - "claim": "Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c7", - "claim": "These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-112-c8", - "claim": "Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L113", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L114", - "hash": "ba5e004e15922f8fa32d362062b20592747db54fd6aba4b2da8698963f446396", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L115", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L116", - "hash": "caca3660e35212981df701b50638df2a59464611b5ec2524aebf8f32a897587f", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L117", - "hash": "3491e014f5503eb5b2fca81db42f6f72765980ba5b5e48ef135b6cf69d7f92cc", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L118", - "hash": "7d97944a91060b82b89a1e4194bd2990ae2b2575f60ebd8b5618447f75a6d7f5", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-118-c1", - "claim": "Claim", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-118-c2", - "claim": "A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L119", - "hash": "2e9a64fb31f15735f92dabbd3f7351cd48d5bfb865ac419ffbc9867eefd41eef", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-119-c1", - "claim": "Additional premises", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c2", - "claim": "The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c3", - "claim": "The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c4", - "claim": "The candidates are direct reads and cached reads.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c5", - "claim": "The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency;", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.original_comparison" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c6", - "claim": "it has not examined cache invalidation after an update.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-119-c7", - "claim": "These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L120", - "hash": "4c83c9e73f1b5ce35bd6308e445eae7f2ba38c79682e75be371c4b66652eadba", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-120-c1", - "claim": "Inference", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c2", - "claim": "Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c3", - "claim": "Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c4", - "claim": "Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c5", - "claim": "Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-120-c6", - "claim": "The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L121", - "hash": "572fcdbe1f734c4a947f10223d5a13a39b4d1d976917b004d2076a2eb8881803", - "status": "partial", - "reason": "Worked finite scenario only; other premises and claims in the row remain unproved.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-121-c1", - "claim": "Counterexample", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c2", - "claim": "Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c3", - "claim": "Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c4", - "claim": "The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases.", - "declarations": [ - "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case" - ] - }, - { - "id": "r-121-c5", - "claim": "Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L122", - "hash": "b512892c88b07b50e8a39d2f3842c305e4fcc9bdbc2d2d1bce82ef2b55044332", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-122-c1", - "claim": "Conclusion", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c2", - "claim": "The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c3", - "claim": "Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c4", - "claim": "Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c5", - "claim": "Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-122-c6", - "claim": "the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L123", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L124", - "hash": "a36c6d348eb99b626a19eab46532d38be9b90368013a58f41e352fb96cf61b5a", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-124-c1", - "claim": "The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c2", - "claim": "The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-124-c3", - "claim": "These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L125", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L126", - "hash": "e906a1f57d0a6e437f1e7e5e904d767fd0cb481fa3417f0a5ce9d860a7e0a003", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L127", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L128", - "hash": "138518c30128ab299ca55da443b75bbb5e00d06101838c912d96e0e91bae491d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-128-c1", - "claim": "The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-128-c2", - "claim": "A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L129", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L130", - "hash": "9c0dbee3cfe706ff00bd6635975de39cb953c75f31cdc0366adce1a866f7856c", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L131", - "hash": "a9e436d2babd638ade86791e162e7de5a6b1b3128c6ae9ed93504fbf3c53dc93", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L132", - "hash": "d90246fc64bc43dd7109dc1d7db61fcf6b096d270c2be6fede6dc1810d18b64d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-132-c1", - "claim": "English authority with a corresponding Chinese version", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c2", - "claim": "The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c3", - "claim": "No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c4", - "claim": "An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-132-c5", - "claim": "Another project could select a different language.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L133", - "hash": "162f01175e7f148b92632b5610a39404a62bc7ba6b556a67c00079c1e4ab5b7d", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-133-c1", - "claim": "A text-centered core and script-free skills", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c2", - "claim": "The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c3", - "claim": "Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c4", - "claim": "Text alone does not establish clarity or capability.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c5", - "claim": "Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-133-c6", - "claim": "their absence here is a design choice.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L134", - "hash": "4098f6e7beaa9e7a7e6c6890c62b3b94290fa4f4e6334261adb91fb63288039c", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-134-c1", - "claim": "`organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb`", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c2", - "claim": "Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c3", - "claim": "Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c4", - "claim": "Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-134-c5", - "claim": "Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L135", - "hash": "7158cac19a6f57ddc4289c3d66d49760d46853ac9d0189432edb65dcf089e80b", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-135-c1", - "claim": "`organon-core-principled-review`", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c2", - "claim": "A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c3", - "claim": "Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c4", - "claim": "Findings retain their standards and limits;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c5", - "claim": "they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-135-c6", - "claim": "Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L136", - "hash": "0f9b821c296c959fb0cb3a2307947fd65bccbb4f8a97f786cdf838e1364965a2", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-136-c1", - "claim": "External `grill-me/grilling`", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c2", - "claim": "Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c3", - "claim": "A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c4", - "claim": "Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-136-c5", - "claim": "Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L137", - "hash": "89c055f6998a430d32f1c0950f51016b8c93e444afec830c48314334c36e45c7", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-137-c1", - "claim": "An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c2", - "claim": "A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c3", - "claim": "This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c4", - "claim": "Separate agents may share assumptions and errors.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c5", - "claim": "A consensus is not proof.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-137-c6", - "claim": "A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L138", - "hash": "c55412ea89518c00d792ebd6543307c91dd02bb1ef881cc86e9ae949da80c30f", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-138-c1", - "claim": "Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c2", - "claim": "This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c3", - "claim": "These are contextual method requirements.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-138-c4", - "claim": "A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L139", - "hash": "57ccbfdcf2c90772f013cb52ce0c5b04ffa8fa96ff84c6fe99c0b75da0f538ec", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-139-c1", - "claim": "A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c2", - "claim": "Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c3", - "claim": "A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c4", - "claim": "Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-139-c5", - "claim": "that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L140", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L141", - "hash": "46bd3957855fe404571f4278a01347c8f6d90aeb4ba3722ea8e009f6b5d041e3", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-141-c1", - "claim": "Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c2", - "claim": "A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c3", - "claim": "Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-141-c4", - "claim": "This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L142", - "hash": "01ba4719c80b6fe911b091a7c05124b64eeece964e09c058ef8f9805daca546b", - "status": "structural", - "reason": "Layout, heading or table label; no independent philosophical theorem.", - "clauses": [] - }, - { - "id": "rationale.L143", - "hash": "0c1ae49e235346ed57ae4e18933474bc83d5e30ce4acf2ffb48069d089e96e85", - "status": "nonformal", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this source clause.", - "clauses": [ - { - "id": "r-143-c1", - "claim": "The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c2", - "claim": "A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c3", - "claim": "The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods;", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - }, - { - "id": "r-143-c4", - "claim": "their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct.", - "declarations": [], - "status": "unresolved", - "reason": "No candidate proof for this argument, contextual premise, historical report or unmodeled relation." - } - ] - } - ], - "declarations": [ - { - "name": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c5" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c2" - }, - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c3" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c4" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L119", - "clause": "r-119-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c2" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c3" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L77", - "clause": "r-77-c3" - } - ] - }, - { - "name": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", - "kind": "case", - "file": "RationaleReader.lean", - "sources": [ - { - "unit": "rationale.L121", - "clause": "r-121-c4" - } - ] - } - ], - "cases": [ - { - "id": "original_comparison", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.original_comparison", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "update_read_counterexample", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.update_read_counterexample", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "cached_freshness_refuted", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.cached_freshness_refuted", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "unchanged_update_retained", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.unchanged_update_retained", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "budget_change_is_distinct", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.budget_change_is_distinct", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "namedUniversalTruth", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.namedUniversalTruth", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "encoded_statement", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.encoded_statement", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "different_statement_refuted", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.different_statement_refuted", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "proof_of_different_claim", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.proof_of_different_claim", - "kind": "conditional_or_finite_case", - "expectation": "Check the exact named statement, under its explicit definitions and premises; this does not certify the source claim." - }, - { - "id": "revised_method_retains_case", - "declaration": "RationaleReader.revised_method_retains_case", - "kind": "method_coverage_fixture", - "expectation": "Compute both read implementations on initial and post-update states, retaining the initial case; no implementation is changed." - } - ] -} diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md b/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md deleted file mode 100644 index 78a8869..0000000 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/rationale/snapshots/source.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,143 +0,0 @@ -# Organon Rationale - -This non-normative companion explains the relationships, grounds, and limits of the [English philosophical authority](../PHILOSOPHY.md). It does not add obligations to the philosophy. - -Sections 1–5 explain the current structure, its reasons, and its cases. Sections 6–7 distinguish philosophical constraints from contextual application choices. These examples illustrate judgments, not a mandatory workflow or proof of universal correctness. - -## 1. Placement and Changes in Normative Status - -| Previous content | Current placement | Change and limits | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Generative Drive | Renamed Self-Transcendence in the charter; its quoted provision is unchanged. | Generative orientation and non-finality are explained separately from grounds for achievement. The new name adds no requirement of autonomous execution, inevitable progress, or change on every action. | -| Internal Consistency and Reflexivity | Charter, unchanged. | Their distinct requirements remain; neither a new name nor a shorter structure establishes their correctness. | -| Grounds: articulation, assessment, proportionate support, and evidence boundaries | Grounds, §§2.1–2.2. | General requirements and limits retain their normative force. The Harness example appears below without making any assessment framework mandatory. | -| Method Capabilities: uniform definitions of mastery and generation | Withdrawn as a core standard; capability claims fall under Grounds, §2.3. | The previous requirement that a system understand and explain method formation to qualify as capable of method generation no longer applies universally. Applications can still adopt it for stated reasons. This changes the former standard rather than merely renaming it. | -| Openness to Alternative Implementations | Grounds, §2.4, as an additional choice commitment. | The provision and its conditions remain. Its placement does not make it a deduction from general support requirements. | -| Repeated summaries in overview, meanings, terminology, and relationships | Definitions remain with their provisions; relationships explain distinctions and mutual constraints. | Necessary meanings and limits remain in the core. Removing duplicate summaries does not withdraw a commitment. | - -## 2. Reasons for Adoption and Their Limits - -### 2.1 Commitments and Objections - -The following gives reasons for adopting the commitments under Organon's chosen aim of a cross-system philosophy of generation and judgment. These are arguments for that position, not proofs of universal necessity or additions to the core. - -| Commitment | Reason for adoption and premise | Objection and limit | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Self-Transcendence | Valuing broader understanding and constructive possibilities gives a reason not to treat present forms as final. This takes their expansion as worth pursuing, rather than treating permission to change as sufficient. | Expansion can be costly or conflict with other values. The commitment does not rank it above every competing objective or require change in every action. Its worth is an adopted value, not established merely by a system's growth. | -| Internal Consistency | If judgments are to guide assessment and construction together, requiring incompatible conclusions under identical conditions undermines that joint guidance. This supports examining their compatibility. | A system may encounter unresolved tensions or conflicting evidence. Distinguishing conditions, qualifying claims, or withdrawing a judgment can address these; consistency alone neither selects the correct judgment nor proves its assumptions. | -| Reflexivity | A system's methods and principles can contribute to the errors it attributes to other objects. Applying relevant requirements to them makes those sources open to correction rather than exempting them because they are its own. | Self-assessment can be biased and cannot establish its own sufficiency. Reflexivity retains applicability conditions and does not demand an endless review chain or a particular independent-review mechanism. | -| Grounds | When judgments guide understanding and construction, identifiable reasons allow their support and limits to be challenged. Proportionality restrains claims that go beyond those reasons. | Articulating grounds can be incomplete or costly. Different claims call for different assessment, not a common numerical test. Initial value commitments need not prove every starting premise, but declaring them does not settle criticism. | -| Openness to Alternative Implementations | If choices are to serve stated objectives, values, and constraints, identity or status alone leaves their relevance to that choice unexplained. This motivates retaining the additional restriction on sufficient reasons. | Continuity, tradition, and identity can matter to an explicitly adopted value. They are not disallowed; the connection, limits, and trade-offs still need assessment. This position does not follow merely from the ability to compare performance. | - -These reasons remain open to criticism under Grounds. Identifying a role for each commitment does not prove that the collection is complete, uniquely organized, or obligatory for every system. Applications supply further objectives and values; this philosophy does not specify a universal ordering of them. - -### 2.2 Capability Standards in Applications - -The former core defined method generation capacity to require understanding and explaining the grounds and limits of method formation or revision. The current core withdraws that uniform definition. Reliable production, understanding, and explanation can be assessed as distinct claims, without prescribing one capability hierarchy for every system. - -External evidence can support a specified capability even when the system cannot explain its internal process. Conversely, reliable output alone need not support a claim to understand that process. An application may require such understanding and explanation, but must make that requirement explicit rather than attributing it to the core. Revising a definition changes the claim assessed; it cannot retroactively establish the former claim. - -This repository retains explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations because its chosen methods should make proposed changes reviewable. That reason supports a contextual method requirement, not a universal test of generation capability. A relevant variation retains the method's application conditions; it is not an arbitrary demand for universal transfer. Forming new methods and revising existing ones can both be assessed, without requiring additional levels of abstraction or a fixed document format as evidence of capability. - -### 2.3 Assessment Tools - -Measurement can make some differences comparable, repeated assessment can examine stability, and a Harness can organize assessment conditions. For example, a software Harness may run update–read sequences under specified conditions, while a research team may compare interpretations of interview accounts. Each choice needs contextual reasons. These examples do not alter the core's limits: the three are not a universally necessary chain, an unreproduced observation can offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. - -### 2.4 Grounds for the Analysis Method - -The [principled-review skill](../skills/organon-core-principled-review/SKILL.md) makes the selected review responsibilities explicit and keeps their definitions in one place. Its purpose is to expose consequential omissions, unsupported claims, and alternatives that a less structured review might miss. That purpose is a reason for trying and assessing the method, not evidence that six dimensions are sufficient for every task. The method itself remains open to criticism under the core, including criticism of its coverage and cost. Its findings identify their standards: an object’s commitments, a selected comparison basis, and the constraints on the review method are distinct. Applying Organon in the review does not establish that the object has adopted it; a method preference does not by itself establish a core conflict. Ordinary narrow assessments and wording corrections need not acquire the full review burden. - -This method adopts a conditional preference for parsimony, not a claim that simplicity establishes truth. The [Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy discussion of simplicity](https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/simplicity/) distinguishes the complexity of principles or hypotheses from the kinds of entities postulated; reducing one can increase the other. It also distinguishes reasons to adopt a working theory from reasons to believe it more likely true. These distinctions motivate identifying the comparison and its relevant constraints rather than treating shorter wording or fewer terms as decisive. The adopted review remains a contextual method choice, not an additional core obligation or proof that the less complex candidate is true. - -## 3. Removal Check - -| Provision temporarily removed | Explicit requirement removed and its distinction from the others | -| --- | --- | -| Self-Transcendence | The others can constrain judgments, capability claims, and implementation choices without independently requiring an intrinsic orientation toward expanding generative possibilities. Requiring support for capability claims does not itself require valuing capability expansion. | -| Internal Consistency | There is no longer a separate requirement that simultaneously held judgments be compatible under the same conditions. Assessing support relations must be distinguished from the joint compatibility of judgments. Separate reasons for each judgment do not by themselves establish overall consistency. | -| Reflexivity | Grounds already concerns principles and judgments, but does not independently specify that relevant principles of generation also govern their own formation and revision. Removing Reflexivity loses that full self-application requirement, without eliminating every element of self-assessment. | -| Grounds | The charter retains self-assessment and requirements for grounds of improvement, but does not independently specify articulability, appropriate assessment for different kinds of claims, and proportionality of support to claim strength and scope. | -| Openness to Alternative Implementations, the choice provision within Grounds | General reasons for a choice can still be assessed, but the explicit commitment that name, convention, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority is lost. | - -The removal check distinguishes contributions and overlaps; it does not claim to establish independence in formal logic. A “loss” means the requirement is no longer explicitly supplied by that provision, not that it could never be derived from other content under any additional assumptions. - -## 4. Illustrative Cases - -The following cases distinguish the current requirements and the application-specific capability standards. These examine the meaning of the philosophy; they are not steps a system is required to execute. - -| Case | Judgment and limits | -| --- | --- | -| A system has grounds to retain its methods while maintaining an orientation toward understanding and changing them. | Stability does not directly violate self-transcendence. Maintaining the orientation does not establish that actual capability has grown. | -| A system revises a principle and withdraws its previous judgment, so that it no longer holds the two contradictory judgments simultaneously. | Changing a view does not directly violate internal consistency. Whether the revision has adequate grounds remains to be assessed. | -| A system’s implications are mutually consistent but depend on a false assumption. | It may remain internally consistent without thereby being correct. | -| Two evaluations emphasize speed and quality respectively, without yet requiring incompatible conclusions. | Tension between values does not itself constitute a contradiction. Actual incompatibility must be assessed under the same conditions and meanings. | -| Under the same assumptions, meanings, and scope, a system simultaneously asserts that a judgment on the same question holds and does not hold. | This violates internal consistency. Describing the system as undergoing self-transcendence does not remove the contradiction. | -| A system assesses its own principles and produces new principles on that basis. | This addresses reflexivity’s requirement concerning its objects, but does not thereby prove the old or new principles correct, or automatically establish the adequacy of the revision. | -| Grounds are fully stated, but an inference merely fails to conflict with its assumptions rather than being supported by them. | Articulability and compatibility do not establish the inference. Grounds requires examination of the support relation. | -| A checked formal proof is presented as support for a prose claim, but the encoding changes that claim’s conditions or the relation between the claim and its grounds. | The proof establishes its encoded statement under its assumptions and proof dependencies; it does not thereby establish the different prose claim. A defect in this correspondence is initially a modeling finding, not by itself a reason to revise the philosophical commitment. | -| A system explicitly states a value starting point as a commitment and explains its reasons, limits, and consequences. | It can be assessed as a value commitment. Lack of numerical results does not directly refute it, nor can it be presented as an empirical necessity. | -| A failure that has not yet been reproduced has a verifiable record. | It may provide corresponding limited support. Whether it supports a particular judgment depends on the record, claim, and scope; it cannot be categorically excluded or generalized without limits. | -| A random system produces different outputs each time but exhibits stable characteristics under stated assessment conditions. | Nonidentical outputs do not automatically invalidate evidence. The conditions and stable characteristics must be examined for what conclusions they support. | -| An application distinguishes using existing methods from forming or revising them. A system can explain and apply existing methods under relevant variations, but has no evidence of forming or revising methods. | The evidence supports the specified use capability, not automatically the separate formation or revision claim. These capability definitions come from the application. | -| An application defines generation capability as producing usable new methods in a stated task family. External evidence supports that capability, but the system cannot explain its internal process. | Lack of internal explanation does not itself disqualify the specified capability. The evidence must support the claimed scope and does not automatically establish understanding of the process. | -| An application explicitly requires a system to understand and explain the grounds and limits of forming methods; the same reliable black box cannot do so. | Reliable production does not satisfy that application requirement. Removing the former uniform core definition does not remove an explicitly chosen contextual requirement. | -| After failing a capability criterion, an author narrows its definition and says the original claim passed unchanged. | A revised definition can support a new assessment, but cannot conceal the change or establish the earlier claim. | -| A system cites one hundred near-identical method documents as its only evidence of expanded understanding and constructive capability. | The count supports a quantity claim, not automatically the claimed expansion. Capability definitions and relevant evidence are still required. | -| An existing approach receives priority because of explicit compatibility or maintenance conditions. | Conventional use is not the sole ground. Relevant conditions can provide reasons for the choice, subject to assessment appropriate to their nature. | -| An approach receives priority solely from its name, conventional use, or established status, without relevant reasons. | Openness to Alternative Implementations treats these grounds as insufficient. It does not thereby require an unconditional preference for a new approach. | -| Two implementations currently give the same answers, but method capabilities, costs, or other relevant effects have not been included in the comparison. | This supports only a comparison within the stated scope, not overall equivalence. A difference not yet assessed must be distinguished from the absence of a difference. | -| A workshop values the continuation of a traditional instrument-making practice and explains how using and teaching its methods serves that objective, within stated resource limits and with acknowledged trade-offs. | Preserving the practice can be an explicitly adopted starting value. Its connection to the implementation can provide a reason for choosing traditional methods, not merely their established status. Whether a particular choice serves that value and fits the constraints still requires assessment; declaring the objective does not give every traditional implementation priority. | -| An approach was preferred only because “it has always been done this way.” That phrase is renamed “the objective,” without explaining the value preserved, the limits of application, or the trade-offs. | Renaming alone adds no support. Grounds still calls for the relevant explanation and assessment; this does not reject tradition or preference as a starting value, or demand an endless chain of external justification. | - -## 5. Applying the Philosophy to This Reconstruction - -Adding principles is not an improvement merely because the count increases. Grounds distinguishes articulation from assessment and limits the support claimed. Capability claims now require application-specific meanings and proportionate support rather than the former uniform definitions. Openness to Alternative Implementations makes explicit that identity or status cannot establish priority on its own. These contributions and their limits can be re-examined through the relationships and cases above. - -Assessment of this text likewise distinguishes philosophical commitments, inferences, and empirical claims. Making a commitment explicit provides no self-proof. Identifying a distinct contribution does not prove universal necessity. Finding no conflict does not amount to proving correctness or independence. - -Checks of confirmed wording, corresponding sections, links, and file hashes verify documentary consistency and the scope of changes; they cannot replace philosophical argument. These checks do not confer philosophical authority on tools, governance procedures, or particular implementations. - -## 6. Constraints Across Different Systems - -The following are hypothetical applications. Their contextual assumptions supply premises beyond the philosophy; their conclusions hold within those premises. - -### 6.1 Research Team - -| Argument element | Application | -| --- | --- | -| Claim | A team can improve its ability to explain why participants abandon a service by revising how it classifies interview accounts. | -| Additional premises | The team values explanatory understanding, wants its classification revisions to be reviewable, and treats participants’ accounts as situated evidence. It has consented interview material, limited staff time, and an existing classification that assigns one reason to each account. The intended claim concerns the interviewed participants; the material does not establish population prevalence. | -| Inference | Self-Transcendence supports openness to revising the classification without demanding novelty. Grounds requires separating what participants reported from the team’s inference and limiting generalization. Internal Consistency requires resolving incompatible classifications under the same definitions or explaining a change of definition. Reflexivity extends this scrutiny to the classification method and its revision. The team distinguishes competent coding from the ability to revise its method, and its stated reviewability objective requires explaining the reasons for that revision. | -| Counterexample | An account describes both cost and accessibility barriers and explicitly explains how they interact. A single-label method loses this reported relationship; adding labels without explaining what they distinguish may merely increase vocabulary. A revised method permits multiple reasons and records their stated relationship. To assess the revision, the team compares what each method preserves on this account and on other relevant accounts, including ones with only one stated reason. Agreement among coders does not by itself establish that the explanation is correct. | -| Conclusion | The revision has a specific potential contribution: preserving relationships reported in the account that the original classification omitted. Preserving those reports does not establish that the relationships hold causally in the world. An explanation and assessment on relevant variations can support a bounded claim that the team improved its classification method under its stated objective; the number of labels alone cannot. Under Openness to Alternative Implementations, joint discussion may suit a small exploratory team, while separate initial readings may help examine shared interpretive bias. These approaches have different costs and evidential limits; either choice needs reasons tied to the study. Neither a software Harness nor an agent skill follows necessarily from this philosophy. | - -### 6.2 Software System - -| Argument element | Application | -| --- | --- | -| Claim | A service team can improve its method for evaluating two read implementations by including changes to the underlying data. | -| Additional premises | The service must return the latest acknowledged update on subsequent reads and meet a stated latency budget. The team also requires evaluation-method revisions to be explainable and tested under relevant variations so reviewers can assess their contribution. The candidates are direct reads and cached reads. The current comparison uses unchanged data and reports matching answers and acceptable latency; it has not examined cache invalidation after an update. These are application requirements, not requirements imposed by Organon on every service. | -| Inference | Grounds limits the existing comparison to unchanged data. Internal Consistency prevents simultaneously claiming the specified freshness guarantee and accepting stale reads under that same guarantee. Self-Transcendence supports improving the evaluation method when its scope misses a relevant condition. Reflexivity requires assessing the method’s own coverage claim. The team’s reviewability requirement calls for explaining why an update followed by a read is a relevant variation and how adding it changes the support available; this is an application premise, not a universal core capability standard. | -| Counterexample | Both candidates pass the original comparison, but one returns a cached value after an acknowledged update. Matching local answers did not establish overall equivalence. The revised method compares both candidates on update–read sequences and retains unchanged-data cases. Passing those cases still leaves unexamined failures, concurrency conditions, or workloads outside their scope. | -| Conclusion | The revision can expose a specific omission and support a capability claim bounded by the cases assessed, when the revised method’s use and limits are understood. Openness to Alternative Implementations permits direct reads for simpler freshness reasoning or cached reads with adequately supported invalidation when latency conditions justify them. Their trade-offs are not erased by a matching output. Executable tests may be useful here, while the research team may use interpretive comparison; the philosophy does not require identical methods or make this text repository a software test Harness. | - -The common constraint concerns reasons, scope, consistency, support for capability claims, and self-application. The differences concern what counts as relevant evidence and which methods serve the stated objectives. These examples show applicability in two contexts, not completeness across all systems. - -## 7. Grounds and Limits of This Repository’s Form - -The repository distinguishes three roles: the core states philosophical commitments; this rationale explains arguments and limits; skills offer revisable application methods. A skill instruction does not become a philosophical obligation merely by referring to the core. - -| Chosen implementation | Contextual reason | Limit and possible alternative | -| --- | --- | --- | -| English authority with a corresponding Chinese version | The agreed arrangement provides a single reference for resolving translation differences while supporting Chinese reading. | No principle establishes English as intrinsically preferable. An inaccurate English statement needs explicit correction; its authority does not establish its truth. Another project could select a different language. | -| A text-centered core and script-free skills | The intended library centers on articulable commitments and a thin agent-facing layer. Text makes the reasons and instructions directly inspectable without maintaining an execution framework. | Text alone does not establish clarity or capability. Another application may have grounds for scripts or other tools; their absence here is a design choice. | -| `organon-core-assess` and `organon-core-absorb` | Separate entrypoints distinguish current philosophical compatibility from reasons for philosophical adoption. Absorb coordinates feedback, review, the user’s decision, and necessary synchronization. | Compatibility alone does not justify adoption; conflict alone does not refute revision reasons. Independent skill and documentation maintenance belongs to the shared workflow, not absorption. | -| `organon-core-principled-review` | A shared six-dimension review supplies grounded findings to assess and absorb and can be used independently. Its name identifies a method rather than limiting the object to the system itself. | Findings retain their standards and limits; they neither automatically establish a philosophical conflict nor decide adoption. Reuse does not replace an independent initial judgment or require recursive review. | -| External `grill-me/grilling` | Reuse of the selected questioning method supports explicit grilling requests and material unresolved choices after facts have been gathered. | A fully specified ordinary assessment need not load it. Missing capability leaves the dependent stage incomplete; unrelated checks can continue. Neither its name nor its questions have philosophical authority. | -| An independent agent for cross-review, with an initial judgment before seeing the author’s proposal | A separate initial assessment is intended to expose omissions without immediately adopting the author’s framing. This is an agreed review method, not a deduction from Reflexivity. | Separate agents may share assumptions and errors. A consensus is not proof. A human reviewer or another review structure may be appropriate elsewhere; an unavailable independent agent means this chosen cross-review remains incomplete. | -| Explanation of method revisions and assessment under relevant variations | This repository seeks reviewable changes: explaining the revision and examining a relevant variation helps assess the claimed contribution beyond a new text. | These are contextual method requirements. A completed explanation or test does not establish a universal capability level or prove improvement outside the assessed scope. | -| A bounded iteration record and a fixed baseline within each assessment | Explicit premises, differences, and unresolved issues help track support and prevent a candidate revision from silently changing the standard used to judge it. | A completed record is not evidence of improvement by itself. Changes to the philosophy require the user’s explicit decision in this repository; that allocation of authority is a contextual arrangement, not a philosophical theorem. | - -Self-application therefore includes examining these methods and their claimed benefits. A useful method revision needs an identifiable contribution, reasons, and assessment under relevant variations. Repeated agreement without new support does not make a claim stronger; lack of support or unresolved disagreement can justify ending an iteration with a limited conclusion. This avoids treating an ever-longer review chain as proof. - -The repository’s philosophical character is supported when its commitments change substantive judgments, constrain its own claims, and guide reasoned choices across different systems. A directory structure, a set of skills, and a review loop do not establish that character on their own. The [skill validation cases](../skills/references/validation.md) examine the selected application methods; their results cannot prove the philosophy universally correct. diff --git a/lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md b/lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md deleted file mode 100644 index 326cf00..0000000 --- a/lean/history/reader-validation-before-migration.md +++ /dev/null @@ -1,23 +0,0 @@ -> Historical result of the preceding reader task, before Core owned the runtime. Current migration results are recorded separately. - -# Validation of the Core 0.1.3 reader edition - -This is a local delivery record dated 2026-09-13. It separates machine checks from reported source correspondence. The source text and its Chinese translation remain unchanged. - -| Check | Actual result | Evidence | -| --- | --- | --- | -| Philosophy Lean build, declaration/dependency audit and four manuscript views | Pass; 18 registered declarations; 123 entries | [Actual result](../core-v0.1.3/philosophy/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json) | -| Rationale Lean build, declaration/dependency audit and four manuscript views | Pass; 10 registered declarations; 371 entries | [Actual result](../core-v0.1.3/rationale/evidence/before-migration-manuscript-check.json) | -| Complete `rtk proxy node --test` | 82 passed, 1 failed, 0 skipped; all 35 manuscript tests and 17 pre-existing Lean checker tests passed | [Complete actual output](../validation/final-node-tests.json) | -| Existing management test failure | The task-start snapshot reproduces the same obsolete expected philosophy-body hash. The test and source bodies were preserved, not changed to obtain a green result | [Baseline reproduction](../validation/preexisting-management-failure.json) | -| Both Lean skill format checks | Pass | [Formalization skill](../validation/final-skill-format.json), [translation skill](../validation/final-translator-format.json) | -| Independent final difference review and ordinary-copy rerun | Pass for both fresh builds and manuscript checks; no fidelity upgrade | [Review](../validation/independent-final-review.md), [Copy results](../validation/relocation.json) | -| English and Chinese source-format checks | Pass; 22 matching stable units | [Actual output](../validation/final-source-format.json) | - -The full suite is **not green**. Its existing failure is in `tests/management.test.js`, which still expects an older English philosophy-body hash. The observed current normalized body hash is `41496fa241aa3c3cb6e3abc83992f904f4cbc4555f6fee935b72fc799fe06ee1`; the expected hash is `2c20e768e68f438edc462647dca33d253b9882cc5125874b70d55bc83ae9da57`. This task did not revise that migration baseline. - -Reported fidelity is 14 limited correspondences and 2 rejected correspondences, with 370 incomplete entries and 108 structural or inapplicable entries. **Zero complete source claims are reported passed.** These are navigation entries, not a measure of philosophical quality. All 424 extracted clauses and 228 nonblank Lean lines have bilingual presentation; this does not establish complete atomic claim segmentation or full formalization. - -Three bounded revisions addressed initial compilation, independently observed source mismatches, and reader/status-checking defects. The final new adversarial case rejects using a countermodel that supports a negative source claim as the sole reason to mark that source claim failed. Kernel results remain separate from source correspondence throughout. Independent first records, informed comparisons, initial code translation and informed code updates are included in each package's `reviews/` directory. Initial exposure limitations are disclosed in the [package overview](../README.md). - -The two rejected attempts concern the missing support relation in an observation-coverage model and the missing substantive examination behind a grounds-ID test. They remain visible as failed source correspondences, although their formulas pass Lean. Assessment's mixed-responsibility and omitted-label clauses have limited correspondence; its full source duty is not certified. diff --git a/lean/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md b/lean/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cc618df --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/PREREGISTERED.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# Frozen goals before Lean encoding + +2026-09-14. Independent source-first inventory and candidate comparison complete. The explicitly authorized complete-core scope is fixed in `targets-frozen.json`, SHA256 `35cda8ba439af8b32fd180efae2829b370bc5b82960cc91feb24e3e03636d2f4`:28 families,33 exact source paragraphs,62 prescribed declarations. Source SHA unchanged. Independent initial and comparison bytes retained. No new Lean code existed before this freeze. + +The author draft's generic removal/satisfiability result is an implementation helper, not a new independent completion target. Only permission-not-entailing-valuation direction is registered. Failed D/W targets cannot be reclassified to boundaries; material scope changes require a new visible decision and preserved previous judgment. This record is an inspectable freeze, not a cryptographic authority against an actor rewriting every record. diff --git a/lean/philosophy/SOURCE-CONTEXT.md b/lean/philosophy/SOURCE-CONTEXT.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..1817956 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/SOURCE-CONTEXT.md @@ -0,0 +1,7 @@ +# Frozen source context + +`snapshots/PHILOSOPHY.md` preserves the exact English PHILOSOPHY 0.1.4 bytes. Its relative links are interpreted from the [Core source location](../../PHILOSOPHY.md), not from the snapshot directory. The linked [rationale](../../rationale/README.md) supplies explanation without adding core obligations or a separate current proof assignment. + +The authoritative source, code, target catalog and reviews have separate identities. The source's version number alone does not establish currentness. Reader statuses remain conditional on the stated representations, assumptions and review scope. + +The original preregistration retains its historical source/catalog identity. The current metadata and rationale path were separately compared in [source migration review](reviews/source-migration-2026-09-15.md); unchanged Lean code, target bodies and bounded judgments are reused with that scope disclosed. diff --git a/lean/philosophy/details.md b/lean/philosophy/details.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b357808 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/details.md @@ -0,0 +1,12119 @@ +# Philosophy and Lean: detailed reader + +This reader follows 28 frozen targets. Target acceptance, Lean checking and source fidelity are separate judgments. Defining a duty does not establish its fulfillment; a finite model does not establish universal real-world correctness. The tracing appendix retains all 33 source paragraphs and two empty headings. + +`accepted` records acceptance of a target within its stated scope; `limited` retains a bounded formal correspondence for a source paragraph; `incomplete` retains material without a complete source proof. Lean `passed` reports checking of registered declarations; checking a normative interface is not fulfillment of its duty. + +[Other granularity](overview.md) · [Frozen targets](targets.json) · [Review and exposure record](reviews/README.md) · [Actual declaration types](evidence/declaration-types.json) + +| Target | Claim | Kind | Target review | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| [T01](#t01) | Authority and boundaries | boundary | accepted | +| [T02](#t02) | A shared nonempty model | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T03](#t03) | Generative commitment | specification | accepted | +| [T04](#t04) | Permission does not supply valuation | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T05](#t05) | Revisability and progress | theorem | accepted | +| [T06](#t06) | Generation has limits | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T07](#t07) | Achievement needs matching grounds | theorem | accepted | +| [T08](#t08) | Whole-theory consistency | theorem | accepted | +| [T09](#t09) | Revision and context changes | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T10](#t10) | Changes must be acknowledged | theorem | accepted | +| [T11](#t11) | Tension and contradiction | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T12](#t12) | Consistency is not truth or coverage | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T13](#t13) | Reflexive work with actual inquiry and reasons | specification | accepted | +| [T14](#t14) | Self-application is not self-proof | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T15](#t15) | Support, strength and scope | theorem | accepted | +| [T16](#t16) | All applicable aspects retain duties | theorem | accepted | +| [T17](#t17) | Articulation, repetition and assertion are insufficient | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T18](#t18) | Adopted value positions and joint reasons | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T19](#t19) | Local evidence and omitted differences | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T20](#t20) | Observation, reproduction and stability | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T21](#t21) | Capability contracts and external assessment | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T22](#t22) | Relevant implementation reasons | theorem | accepted | +| [T23](#t23) | An accurate assessment does not enforce the extra choice norm | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T24](#t24) | Openness does not imply equivalence or plurality | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T25](#t25) | Mutual application in one system | theorem | accepted | +| [T26](#t26) | Distinct commitments and their combination | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T27](#t27) | Application duties and individual reasons | theorem | accepted | +| [T28](#t28) | Assessment without observation tests | satisfiability | accepted | + + +## T01 · Authority and boundaries + +The adopted English source, including its meanings, applicability and limits, remains the authority against which this formalization is compared. + +**Premises and representation:** This entry records the selected source and documentary boundary; it has no required Lean declaration. + +**Proof or check:** The target catalog records the source units and their boundary status. There is no mathematical derivation of the authority or adoption of the philosophy. + +**Limits:** Source correspondence and acceptance of a philosophical position are separate from kernel checking. Neither the catalog nor the proofs establish universal philosophical correctness. + +**State:** accepted (boundary). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.preamble#p1](#source-organon-preamble-p1), [organon.preamble#p2](#source-organon-preamble-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p1](#source-organon-charter-overview-p1), [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3) + +This boundary target has no Lean declaration. + + + +## T02 · A shared nonempty model + +One explicitly inhabited System and World jointly carry the charter, its own supported output capability, relevant implementation choice, and grounds for each of five represented commitments. + +**Premises and representation:** The witness is actualSystem at actual = (identity, apply). The world type independently varies two implementations and two governance modes. Its context includes the system theory, observation assumptions and application scope; the contracts and assessment adapters are explicit model choices. + +**Proof or check:** jointWitness supplies that same pair throughout, using actualAdmissible, charterChecked, ownCapabilityGrounded, identityJustified and reasonsBelongToCommitments. The existential conclusion also identifies the witnesses by equality. + +**Limits:** This proves coexistence in the disclosed application model, not correctness of every possible system or independent validation of the adopted normative criteria. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.preamble#p1](#source-organon-preamble-p1), [organon.preamble#p2](#source-organon-preamble-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:595](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-595) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem jointWitness : + ∃ s : System, ∃ w : World, + Admissible (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) w ∧ Charter s w ∧ + OwnCapabilityDuty s w [capabilityFacet] ∧ systemCapability s w ∧ + JustifiedChoice s.requirements (s.method.realize w) objectiveReason ∧ + (∀ c : Commitment, Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c]) ∧ + s = actualSystem ∧ w = actual := by +``` + + + +## T03 · Generative commitment + +Generative is defined as valuing expanded understanding and construction, together with revisability of every form that the policy treats as current. + +**Premises and representation:** The parameter is a Policy with worthPursuing, current and revisable predicates. The revisability clause applies to forms satisfying current; permitsVersion is a separate field. + +**Proof or check:** The declaration is a conjunction defining an obligation. Later concrete policies instantiate it; the definition itself is not a theorem that any agent satisfies it. + +**Limits:** The representation does not establish that the valued aim is ultimately good, that every permitted edit advances it, or that a current form must be changed immediately. + +**State:** accepted (specification). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3), [organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-orientation-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-non-finality-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2) + +### `CoreReader.Agency.Generative` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:33](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-33) · definition + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +def Generative (p : Policy) : Prop := +``` + + + +## T04 · Permission does not supply valuation + +Permission to change a version can hold while the generative valuation is absent. + +**Premises and representation:** The concrete neutral policy permits versions but assigns no worth to the expansion aim; Generative retains its valuation conjunct. + +**Proof or check:** permissionNotValuation evaluates the permission and unfolds Generative to refute its missing valuation clause. + +**Limits:** This is a counterexample to an implication between represented predicates; it does not justify either policy or classify all real permissions. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-orientation-p1) + +### `CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:49](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-49) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem permissionNotValuation : + neutralPolicy.permitsVersion 0 1 ∧ (0 : Nat) ≠ 1 ∧ ¬ Generative neutralPolicy := by +``` + + + +## T05 · Revisability and progress + +Generative policies leave current forms revisable, while the concrete open policy can remain generative through a trace with no capability expansion. + +**Premises and representation:** The general revisability result assumes Generative and that the selected form is current. The example covers organization, method, principle, appearance and artifact, and uses a constant base-state trace. + +**Proof or check:** revisabilityCovers projects the revisability obligation. revisionWithoutProgress instantiates the open policy and shows that adjacent identical states contain no newly understood or constructed operation. + +**Limits:** Revisability and permission are not evidence that revision occurred or improved capability. The result is not a universal claim that revision never yields progress. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-non-finality-p1), [organon.relationships.terms#p1](#source-organon-relationships-terms-p1) + +### `CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:58](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-58) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem revisabilityCovers (p : Policy) (h : Generative p) (k : FormKind) (v : Nat) + (hc : p.current ⟨k, v⟩) : p.revisable ⟨k, v⟩ := h.2 _ hc +``` + +### `CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:123](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-123) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem revisionWithoutProgress : + Generative openPolicy ∧ + (∀ k : FormKind, openPolicy.revisable ⟨k, 0⟩) ∧ + (∀ t, ¬ Expanded (stableTrace t) (stableTrace (t + 1))) := by +``` + + + +## T06 · Generation has limits + +One generating system illustrates non-progressing inflation, dependence on three external resources, a justified stable action within its application budget, and a false expansion report about its own actual transition. + +**Premises and representation:** The system combines openPolicy, baseState, assistedExecution, required copy capability and an inventory budget of 1. inflatedState duplicates artifacts, abstraction layers and vocabulary without adding understood or constructed operations. Its report names this owner, before/after states and successor at input 0 with expected output 1. + +**Proof or check:** generationLimits evaluates the same system interface: available resources yield 6, deleting any of experience/knowledge/collaborator or all three yields none; the stable action preserves the current state, required capability and budget. Inflation exceeds that budget, and the system-generated report fails because its claimed new operation is absent. + +**Limits:** The resource dependence and budget are declared application conditions. These content-bearing examples do not establish universal laws of learning, mandatory austerity, or the adequacy of any real expansion report. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2) + +### `CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:222](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-222) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem generationLimits : + Generative generatingSystem.policy ∧ + generatingSystem.policy.permitsVersion 0 0 ∧ + ¬ Expanded generatingSystem.current inflatedState ∧ + generatingSystem.current.inventory.length < inflatedState.inventory.length ∧ + generatingSystem.current.abstractionLayers.length < inflatedState.abstractionLayers.length ∧ + generatingSystem.current.vocabulary.length < inflatedState.vocabulary.length ∧ + generatingSystem.execute availableResources = some 6 ∧ + generatingSystem.execute { availableResources with experience := none } = none ∧ +``` + + + +## T07 · Achievement needs matching grounds + +AchievementAccountability requires Grounds for the very achievement claim. Given support and an actual evidence-compatible world, that claim holds there; a concrete expansion case has matching grounds, while its positive self-report alone does not support it. + +**Premises and representation:** The general theorem takes a world type, achievement predicate, records, actual world, Compatible records actual and Supports records achievement. Separately, the concrete alternatives share baseState and input 0: extend adds successor, whereas inflate only duplicates content. + +**Proof or check:** achievementNeedsSupport applies support to the compatible actual world and includes ConcreteAchievementExample. Actual after-state performance distinguishes extend and supplies canonical matched grounds; the positive report is also compatible with inflate, where Expanded before after is false. + +**Limits:** The definition expresses normative accountability without making observation universally mandatory. The theorem assumes support in its general branch and does not infer it from an arbitrary assertion or prove real achievement from record labels. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2), [organon.grounds#p1](#source-organon-grounds-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p1](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p2](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p2) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-125) · definition + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +def AchievementAccountability {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-217) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem achievementNeedsSupport {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (records : List (Record W)) + (actual : W) (reliableHere : Compatible records actual) (support : Supports records achievement) : + achievement actual ∧ ConcreteAchievementExample := +``` + + + +## T08 · Whole-theory consistency + +An inhabited common theory and context cannot semantically yield both answers to one question. Separately satisfiable assumptions may nevertheless become inconsistent when held together. + +**Premises and representation:** consequenceConsistency quantifies over world and question types, a held theory and one Context, and assumes an Admissible world satisfying the entire held theory, contextual assumptions and scope simultaneously. + +**Proof or check:** The general proof evaluates both consequences at the same witness to obtain a contradiction. jointConflict combines P, P implies Q, and not Q: each singleton has a model, but their union has none. + +**Limits:** The nonempty witness is essential to this semantic consistency argument. Pairwise or isolated checks do not establish joint satisfiability, and no empirical truth of the assumptions is inferred. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-p1) + +### `CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:31](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-31) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem consequenceConsistency {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) + (inhabited : ∃ w, Admissible t c w) : Consistent t c := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:59](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-59) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem jointConflict : + Satisfiable (singleton premiseP) ∧ Satisfiable (singleton premiseRule) ∧ + Satisfiable (singleton premiseNotQ) ∧ ¬ Satisfiable jointTheory := by +``` + + + +## T09 · Revision and context changes + +Different time-indexed theories can give opposite answers without either being unsatisfiable; changing assumptions, question meaning or scope can likewise change the answer. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples fix explicit Boolean interpretations and separately inhabited contexts. The positive and negative answers belong to different theory slices or contexts, not one unchanged conjunction. + +**Proof or check:** revisionCanReverse constructs the two slices and shows their simultaneous union fails. contextDifferences separately changes the assumptions, meaning and scope components while evaluating the corresponding consequences. + +**Limits:** These examples distinguish revision and contextual difference from simultaneous contradiction. They do not establish that a particular revision is warranted, truthful or progressive. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p2) + +### `CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:78](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-78) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem revisionCanReverse : + Satisfiable (revisionSlice 0) ∧ Satisfiable (revisionSlice 1) ∧ + ¬ Satisfiable (union (revisionSlice 0) (revisionSlice 1)) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:102](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-102) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem contextDifferences : + (Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext false) () false) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (assumptionContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (meaningContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (scopeContext b) w) := by +``` + + + +## T10 · Changes must be acknowledged + +Under TruthfulReport, a semantic change or a different revision identity requires a positive change report. Reordering the same held content does not change that content, and honest reporting does not make revised assumptions true. + +**Premises and representation:** The general result assumes two snapshots, a report flag, the TruthfulReport obligation and an actual semantic-or-identity change. SameContent compares held claims, contextual assumptions, meaning and scope extensionally. + +**Proof or check:** semanticChangeMustBeReported applies the assumed reporting obligation; representationOrderIrrelevant proves union commutativity. hiddenContextChangeRejected evaluates separate hidden assumption, meaning, scope and identity changes, and an acknowledged revision false at the designated actual world. + +**Limits:** The reporting rule is adopted, not derived from logic alone. The cases do not decide every possible form of revision or certify the quality of an acknowledged change. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p2) + +### `CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:142](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-142) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem semanticChangeMustBeReported {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) + (changed : ¬ SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) + (h : TruthfulReport a b reported) : reported = true := h changed +``` + +### `CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:150](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-150) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem representationOrderIrrelevant {W : Type} (p q : Claim W) : + ∀ r, union (singleton p) (singleton q) r ↔ union (singleton q) (singleton p) r := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:160](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-160) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem hiddenContextChangeRejected : + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (meaningContext true)) (contextSnapshot (meaningContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true)) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 0) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 1) false ∧ + (TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) true ∧ + ¬ Models (assumptionContext false).assumptions true) := by +``` + + + +## T11 · Tension and contradiction + +Distinct resource objectives can be jointly satisfiable. In contrast, positive and negative consequences for the same question in the same theory and context violate Consistent. + +**Premises and representation:** The tension example uses the predicates 4 ≤ budget and budget ≤ 6. conflictRequiresChange takes an arbitrary theory, context and question together with both opposed consequences. + +**Proof or check:** tensionWithoutContradiction supplies budget 5 and proves the predicates are different. conflictRequiresChange applies the definition of Consistent to the given pair of consequences. + +**Limits:** The latter theorem proves inconsistency; it neither constructs a repair nor determines which commitment should change. The resource example does not classify every practical tension. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-limits-p1) + +### `CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:186](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-186) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem tensionWithoutContradiction : + (∃ budget : Nat, 4 ≤ budget ∧ budget ≤ 6) ∧ + ¬ ((fun n : Nat => 4 ≤ n) = (fun n : Nat => n ≤ 6)) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:195](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-195) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem conflictRequiresChange {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (q : Q) + (positive : Consequence t c q true) (negative : Consequence t c q false) : + ¬ Consistent t c := fun h => h q ⟨positive,negative⟩ +``` + + + +## T12 · Consistency is not truth or coverage + +Satisfiability does not establish truth at a designated actual world, and a satisfiable theory can leave an explicit question undecided. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples use Boolean worlds: the singleton assumption that the world is true, and the empty theory with the question whether the world is true. + +**Proof or check:** consistentFalse supplies the true model and refutes the singleton assumption at false. consistentIncomplete supplies models of the empty theory and uses opposite worlds to refute entailment of each answer. + +**Limits:** These are explicit satisfiability and non-entailment results, not an empirical classification of actual beliefs or a general incompleteness theorem for formal arithmetic. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-limits-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:205](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-205) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem consistentFalse : Satisfiable (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) ∧ + ¬ Models (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) false := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:216](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-216) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem consistentIncomplete : Satisfiable (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w ≠ true) := by +``` + + + +## T13 · Reflexive work with actual inquiry and reasons + +Reflexive requires coherent principle registration and valid applications to every owned subject where each registered principle actually applies. A valid application carries the principle’s inquiry, reasons, limits and a result satisfying its independently specified meaning. + +**Premises and representation:** The parameters are an owner, registered principles and work records. ValidApplication binds principle identity, subject, generation/assessment activity, resolved target method, exact inquiry, nonempty target-matched reasons, limits and semantic result; applicability and ownership are explicit conditions. + +**Proof or check:** This declaration defines the obligation. The shared model’s completeOwnWork_reflexive supplies content-checked work for the system, two principles and their formation/application/revision processes; the evaluator uses actual samples, declared scope and counterexamples, and accepts an insufficient verdict for revision. + +**Limits:** Generation is required only for generationEligible subjects; application-phase processes receive assessment in this model. Valid work, including a negative verdict, does not prove the assessed principles correct or exhaust real reflexive inquiry. + +**State:** accepted (specification). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.reflexivity#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-p1), [organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-limits-p1) + +### `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151](#line-code-leanified-corereader-reflexivity-lean-151) · definition + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +def Reflexive (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : Prop := +``` + + + +## T14 · Self-application is not self-proof + +An applicable owned subject cannot be omitted from a Reflexive work set, while inapplicable subjects need not receive work. Passing a selected self-test and generating a revision oneself do not establish universal correctness. + +**Premises and representation:** noSelfExemption assumes Reflexive, principle membership, matching owner and applicability. applicabilityRetained preserves those conditions. The counterexamples use the same arithmetic principle across test and claim, and a GeneratingProcess with owner 17, a false prior, seed 0 and its actual output revision. + +**Proof or check:** The general proofs extract valid work and its scope. The arithmetic principle passes at 1 but fails at 0. selfOriginDoesNotSupport includes the actual producer/prior/output relationship: its revision passes the input-0 observation but fails at 1, giving an evidence-compatible counterworld to allTrue. + +**Limits:** Scope coverage is weaker than full valid Reflexive work. The examples reject self-certification implications; they do not show all self-tests or self-generated revisions are worthless. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-limits-p1) + +### `CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165](#line-code-leanified-corereader-reflexivity-lean-165) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem noSelfExemption (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) + (h : Reflexive owner rules records) (rule : Principle) (hr : rule ∈ rules) + (s : Subject) (hs : s.owner = owner) (ha : rule.applicable s) : + Performed records s rule.activity := h.toScope rule hr s hs ha +``` + +### `CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407](#line-code-leanified-corereader-reflexivity-lean-407) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem applicabilityRetained (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : + (Reflexive owner rules records → ReflexiveScope owner rules records) ∧ + (ReflexiveScope owner rules records ↔ + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → (¬ rule.applicable s ∨ Performed records s rule.activity)) ∧ + (Reflexive 0 [applicationRule] applicationWork ∧ + ¬ Performed applicationWork (.system 0) .assessment) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:275](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-275) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem selfTestDoesNotProve : + selfTest [1] = true ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false ∧ + ¬ (∀ n, ownArithmeticPrinciple n = true) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-616) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem selfOriginDoesNotSupport : + localGenerator 0 0 = true ∧ localGenerator 0 1 = false ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue ∧ OwnedRevisionExample := by +``` + + + +## T15 · Support, strength and scope + +Grounds binds the same claim to all actually applicable represented facets and their actual articulations. With evidence fixed, support is preserved when the conclusion is weakened or its quantified scope is restricted. + +**Premises and representation:** Grounds takes a claim, facet-indexed articulations, an actualApplicable predicate and a nonempty list covering that predicate. Each listed facet must have that claim, be articulated, match its actual premises/reasons/limits, and pass its disclosed assessment adapter. supportWeakening assumes Supports records p and pointwise p implies q; scopeRestriction assumes a supported broad-domain conclusion and inclusion of the narrower domain. + +**Proof or check:** The obligation is defined, not universally proved. Both preservation proofs apply the original support at the same compatible world and then the implication or scope inclusion. The empirical, inferential and value articulation adapters expose the corresponding real record compatibility, theory or option-indexed reasons. + +**Limits:** These theorems weaken conclusions, not evidence. FacetDischarged and the canonical articulation are application-specific semantic adapters, not a complete definition or proof of all source-level empirical or value adequacy. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds#p1](#source-organon-grounds-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-112) · definition + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +def Grounds {W : Type} (claim : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-228) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem supportWeakening {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p q : Claim W) + (support : Supports records p) (weaker : ∀ w, p w → q w) : Supports records q := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-245) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem scopeRestriction {W X : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p : W → X → Prop) + (wide narrow : X → Prop) (included : ∀ x, narrow x → wide x) + (support : Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, wide x → p w x)) : + Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, narrow x → p w x) := +``` + + + +## T16 · All applicable aspects retain duties + +Duties for two sets of applicable aspects combine exactly as their union, and an added label cannot waive them. A claim with empirical and value aspects can pass the represented empirical check while failing its value procedure. + +**Premises and representation:** assessmentUnion uses two actual facet predicates; labelsCannotWaive uses a label that does not alter those predicates or FacetDischarged. The mixed switch example concerns the same selected-on claim: an actual observation assesses the selection fact, while adoption also invokes the value procedure. + +**Proof or check:** The general proofs distribute universal obligations over disjunction and unfold the label wrapper. mixedMissingResponsibility combines discharged switch evidence with an unsupportedPosition whose empty reason list fails ValueProcedure. + +**Limits:** The empty-list failure establishes missing recorded procedural responsibility, not that no adequate value reason could exist. Which aspects actually apply remains an explicit input requiring source-faithful judgment. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-261) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem assessmentUnion {W : Type} (a b : Facet W → Prop) : + Duties (fun f => a f ∨ b f) ↔ Duties a ∧ Duties b := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-272) · theorem + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem labelsCannotWaive {W : Type} (xs ys : List String) (a : Facet W → Prop) : + LabeledDuties xs a ↔ LabeledDuties ys a := Iff.rfl +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-362) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem mixedMissingResponsibility : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬ LabeledDuties [] (fun f : Facet Bool => f = switchEmpirical ∨ f = .value unsupportedPosition) := by +``` + + + +## T17 · Articulation, repetition and assertion are insufficient + +Articulation, repeated irrelevant observations, compatibility with a theory and self-assertion each fail to establish the stronger claim in explicit counterexamples. A nonempty announcement can coexist with a real budget violation. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples distinguish observable temperature from another output and observed selection from available budget. The budget model evaluates the same adopted option with cost 3; starting assumptions fix selection without guaranteeing budget. A true activation announcement is compatible with budget 0. + +**Proof or check:** articulationNotSupport supplies a nonempty but uninformative articulation. measurementRepeatNotSupport retains counterworlds after repeating the same actual tests. compatibilityNotEntailment contrasts an existing joint model with a failed universal consequence. selfAssertionNotReason includes both missing reasons and the nonempty announcement case whose joint adoption is possible but whose actual cost exceeds its budget. + +**Limits:** These are failures for specified claims and grounds, not a dismissal of articulation, repetition or compatibility. The missing-reasons branch is procedural; the budget branch additionally gives a substantive counterexample within its chosen objective/constraint adapter. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-377) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem articulationNotSupport : Articulated uninformativeArgument ∧ + ¬ Entails uninformativeArgument.assumptions (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-451) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem measurementRepeatNotSupport : + temperatureRecord.test (true,false) = true ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,false) ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,0) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,3) ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord,actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean:229](#line-code-leanified-corereader-logic-lean-229) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem compatibilityNotEntailment : + Satisfiable (union emptyTheory (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true))) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-478) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem selfAssertionNotReason : + (unsupportedPosition.commitment true ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure unsupportedPosition) ∧ + (announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ announcementPosition.commitment (true,0) ∧ + ¬ announcementPosition.consequence (true,0) ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition) ∧ + JointAdoption announcementPosition := +``` + + + +## T18 · Adopted value positions and joint reasons + +A value-assessment procedure can be fulfilled from a satisfiable adopted starting position that is not entailed by the empty theory. Joint reasons can support the adopted option’s actual consequence even when neither reason alone suffices. + +**Premises and representation:** ValueProcedure requires nonempty option-indexed reasons; one world satisfying starting assumptions, limits, adoption and all reasons together; joint reason support for that option’s objective and constraints within starting/limits; and a nonempty response to relevant criticism. These are the declared option–outcome assessment conditions. + +**Proof or check:** valueWithoutSelfProof constructs the beneficial on option, shows its starting theory satisfiable and its commitment not entailed by emptyTheory, and rejects opposite, contradictory and impossible adoption variants. heterogeneousReasons includes actual empirical/inferential/value cases and a benefit-4/cost-at-most-3 example: the reasons together pass, but worlds (4,5) and (0,3) defeat each reason separately. + +**Limits:** The procedure checks a disclosed application adapter, not ultimate value justification or a mandatory deductive form for every value reason. A response string is recorded engagement, not proof of a satisfactory reply; non-self-derived starting points are distinguished from inconsistent starts. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:493](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-493) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem valueWithoutSelfProof : ValueProcedure switchPosition ∧ + Satisfiable switchPosition.starting ∧ + ¬ Entails (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) switchPosition.commitment ∧ + (JointAdoption oppositePosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure oppositePosition) ∧ + (¬ ValueProcedure contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure impossibleAdoptionPosition) := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:564](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-564) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem heterogeneousReasons : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.inferential (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) (fun w => w = true)) ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.value switchPosition) ∧ JointReasonsExample := by +``` + + + +## T19 · Local evidence and omitted differences + +Agreement on the observed input can conceal disagreement elsewhere, so input-specific evidence does not support a universal claim. + +**Premises and representation:** Worlds are Boolean-valued functions on natural-number inputs. zeroRecord observes only that input 0 returns true; the compared functions are constant true and localGenerator 0. + +**Proof or check:** localNotUniversal retains localGenerator 0 as a record-compatible counterworld to allTrue. hiddenDifference proves agreement wherever n = 0 and evaluates the differing outputs at n = 1. + +**Limits:** The conclusion concerns the stated observation scope. It does not rule out justified generalization from additional premises or establish a general statistical inference rule. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.scope#p1](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p1), [organon.grounds.scope#p2](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p2), [organon.grounds.scope#p3](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:630](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-630) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem localNotUniversal : + (∃ outside : Nat, outside ≠ 0) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (fun _ => true) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + allTrue (fun _ => true) ∧ ¬ allTrue (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:645](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-645) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem hiddenDifference : + (∀ n : Nat, n = 0 → (fun _ : Nat => true) n = localGenerator 0 n) ∧ + (fun _ : Nat => true) 1 ≠ localGenerator 0 1 := by +``` + + + +## T20 · Observation, reproduction and stability + +One observation can support a bounded claim without repetition; a valid inferential assessment need not use observation at all. Record accuracy, reproduced conditions and stability of a conclusion are distinct, and different outcomes can preserve the same bound. + +**Premises and representation:** The observation concerns input 0 only. The non-observational facet assumes n = 2 and concludes n + 1 = 3. Trial explicitly separates setting, actualOutcome and recordedOutcome; Verified compares actual and recorded values, Reproduced compares settings, and Bounded means actualOutcome ≤ 2. + +**Proof or check:** singleObservation proves local support and refutes allTrue. noUniversalChain supplies a discharged arithmetic facet without observation. variableOutcomesStableBound uses actual outcomes 1 and 2 under setting 0; verificationReproductionStability supplies separate cases with changed settings, inaccurate records and an outcome above the bound. + +**Limits:** This is a finite possible-trial model, not a probability theorem, empirical reproducibility study or guarantee about future runs. It refutes a universally mandatory observation chain only within the represented assessment interfaces. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.scope#p1](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p1), [organon.grounds.scope#p2](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p2), [organon.grounds.scope#p3](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:656](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-656) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem singleObservation : [zeroRecord].length = 1 ∧ + (∃ f, Compatible [zeroRecord] f) ∧ + Supports [zeroRecord] (fun f => f 0 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:673](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-673) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem noUniversalChain : FacetDischarged arithmeticFacet ∧ usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:694](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-694) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem variableOutcomesStableBound : + let a : Trial := ⟨0,1,1⟩ +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:705](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-705) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem verificationReproductionStability : + (Verified ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Verified ⟨1,1,1⟩ ∧ ¬ Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨1,1,1⟩) ∧ + (Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Bounded ⟨0,3,2⟩) ∧ + (Bounded ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Bounded ⟨0,2,0⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,2,0⟩) := by +``` + + + +## T21 · Capability contracts and external assessment + +Correct outputs and an explanation contract are distinct for the same Process. Output-only and explanation-requiring applications have actual, scoped grounds; an external assessor can certify the former without the process providing an internal explanation. Duplicating inventory does not add represented operations. + +**Premises and representation:** OutputContract requires n + n for every natural input. ExplanationContract requires a provided Program whose evaluation equals that very process’s output at every input. processScope fixes the assessed process by equality; its canonical articulation and facet use that same scope and contract. ExternalCertificate is indexed by the actual process and distinguishes assessor 42 from assessed participant 7. + +**Proof or check:** Concrete evaluation proves both processes double their inputs; outputOnlyProcess has none, while explainedProcess supplies doubleInput. The same output-only process refutes the stronger full contract under its inhabited object scope. externalAssessment constructs the full output proof rather than assuming its truth; inventoryNotCapability proves available-operation membership unchanged by duplication. + +**Limits:** These arithmetic contracts are application choices, not a universal definition of capability or understanding. The explanation contract concerns an explicit certificate, not unobserved mental understanding; external participant identifiers do not establish real-world provenance. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.capabilities#p1](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p2](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p2) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:793](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-793) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem outputNotExplanation : OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ OutputContractEvidence := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:801](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-801) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem applicationContractsDiffer : + (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ¬ (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess)) ∧ + (OutputContract explainedProcess ∧ ExplanationContract explainedProcess) ∧ + ScopedApplicationEvidence := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:821](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-821) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem externalAssessment : + (∃ certificate : ExternalCertificate outputOnlyProcess, + certificate.assessorId = 42 ∧ certificate.assessedId = 7 ∧ + certificate.assessorId ≠ certificate.assessedId ∧ OutputContract outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:85](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-85) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem inventoryNotCapability (kind : InventoryKind) (ops : List Operation) (op : Operation) : + Available ((ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x) ++ (ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x)) op ↔ + Available (ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x) op := by +``` + + + +## T22 · Relevant implementation reasons + +Status alone cannot satisfy the represented implementation-choice norm. An existing conventional implementation can satisfy it when its actual behavior supplies a relevant reason and it meets the requirements. + +**Premises and representation:** JustifiedChoice requires feasibility plus a listed Relevant reason. The adopted Relevant definition excludes status reasons and checks actual method content against requirements. The concrete identity application requires identity outputs, budget 1 and admits the output reason. + +**Proof or check:** statusOnlyFails unfolds the status branch for any requirements, implementation and status reason. conventionWithReason evaluates the conventional/established identity implementation and constructs its output-based justification. + +**Limits:** The exclusion is an explicitly adopted choice norm, not a value-neutral theorem. This case neither rejects all existing implementations nor proves the chosen requirements universally adequate. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p1), [organon.grounds.implementations#p2](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p2) + +### `CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean:58](#line-code-leanified-corereader-choice-lean-58) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem statusOnlyFails (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (k : StatusKind) : + ¬ JustifiedChoice req i [.status k] := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean:116](#line-code-leanified-corereader-choice-lean-116) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem conventionWithReason : + identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ identityImpl.established = true ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .convention, .method .output] := by +``` + + + +## T23 · An accurate assessment does not enforce the extra choice norm + +Two independently specified choice policies complete the same accurate negative status-priority audit yet differ on the additional choice norm: the status-only policy fails and the output-reason policy passes. + +**Premises and representation:** Both policies select identity and share the true conventional/established facts, the exact question whether those facts entail identity priority, and report false. Only priorityReasons changes. GeneralAssessmentFulfilled records articulation and accurate completion of this audit; AdditionalChoiceNorm separately checks JustifiedChoice. + +**Proof or check:** generalGroundsNotChoice retains the status non-entailment countermodel and includes PolicyIndependenceExample. The successor interpretation satisfies the same status facts but refutes priority; statusOnlyFails and identityJustified then establish the opposed policy results without changing that audit. + +**Limits:** The result concerns fulfillment of the specified assessment procedure, not full philosophical Grounds. Continuing to prioritize unsupported status can also violate general support proportionality; this theorem does not claim otherwise or prove the choice norm independent of every core obligation. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p1), [organon.grounds.implementations#p2](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean:284](#line-code-leanified-corereader-choice-lean-284) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem generalGroundsNotChoice : + (Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusFacts selected) ∧ + priorityClaim .identity ∧ ¬ priorityClaim .successor ∧ + ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .standing]) ∧ + PolicyIndependenceExample := +``` + + + +## T24 · Openness does not imply equivalence or plurality + +An open choice setting may have only one feasible represented candidate. Local agreement does not make implementations equivalent, and eligible internal-method reasons need not suffice for selection when a required output is wrong. + +**Premises and representation:** The candidate type contains identity and successor, evaluated against identity outputs and budget 1. Relevant internal reasons are selected by Requirements.values and checked for faithful explanation, applicability, cost or procedure. A separate cheap successor costs 1 but still returns n + 1. + +**Proof or check:** singleFeasible identifies the unique feasible candidate. localNotGlobal contrasts agreement at 0 with disagreement at 1. internalReasons validates four real reasons for identity and includes a cheap-but-wrong counterexample. openNotEquivalent retains justified identity choice while proving its output differs from successor. + +**Limits:** Uniqueness is relative to these two candidates and stated requirements. Relevance is not sufficient feasibility, and openness does not entail equal merit, mandatory plurality or rejection of the existing option. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-limits-p1) + +### `CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean:132](#line-code-leanified-corereader-choice-lean-132) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem singleFeasible : + (∀ candidate, Feasible identityRequirements (implementation candidate) ↔ candidate = .identity) ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean:146](#line-code-leanified-corereader-choice-lean-146) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem localNotGlobal : + (∀ x, x = 0 → identityImpl.run x = changedOutsideZero.run x) ∧ + identityImpl.run 1 ≠ changedOutsideZero.run 1 := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean:168](#line-code-leanified-corereader-choice-lean-168) · case + +Core dependencies: none. + +```lean +theorem internalReasons : + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .explanation) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .applicability) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .simplicity) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .procedure) ∧ + (Relevant identityRequirements cheapSuccessor (.method .simplicity) ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity]) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean:182](#line-code-leanified-corereader-choice-lean-182) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem openNotEquivalent : + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason ∧ + identityImpl.run 0 ≠ successorImpl.run 0 := by +``` + + + +## T25 · Mutual application in one system + +The shared system maintains consistency through an acknowledged revision, carries owned assessment work and grounds for its own capability, assesses its general grounds provision, and evaluates its current philosophical method using relevant proposal decisions rather than status. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples use actualSystem and actual. The revised theory adds the same method’s input-0 fact and changes revision identity. GroundsProvision quantifies over arbitrary represented claims and facet packages under apply/waive permissions. The current philosophy method shares the system’s principle form and governance mode and is assessed on two specified proposal inputs. + +**Proof or check:** revisionKeepsConsistency reuses the same admissible witness and rejects a false change report. ownCapabilityGrounded combines owned assessment work with matching output grounds. groundsSelfAssessment evaluates the general provision through the grounds commitment’s actual acceptance/rejection consequences and relevant criticism. existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged proves acceptance of the valid proposal, rejection of the cheap wrong one, status-only failure and output-based justification for this actual method. + +**Limits:** These are constructed results for one system. Owned assessment work and capability grounds are separately checked components, not a claim that one work record contains the entire capability proof. Classical decision definitions are mathematical devices; the value adapter does not establish ultimate justification of the philosophy. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:144](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-144) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem revisionKeepsConsistency : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ Consistent revisedHeld context ∧ + TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot true ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot false := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:165](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-165) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem ownCapabilityGrounded : + OwnCapabilityDuty actualSystem actual [capabilityFacet] ∧ capability actual := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:443](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-443) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem groundsSelfAssessment : + Grounds (fun w => GroundsProvision w.2) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet .grounds) [commitmentFacet .grounds] ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).limits actual ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor .grounds .waive) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:497](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-497) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged : + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).form = actualSystem.principleForm ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).mode = actualSystem.governance actual ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.status .standing] ∧ + JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.method .output] ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 0 = 1 ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 1 = 0 := by +``` + + + +## T26 · Distinct commitments and their combination + +Generative orientation alone does not ensure Reflexive work, and a charter-satisfying system can still present inadequate evidence for its own capability. A shared witness also shows the represented commitments can all be met together. + +**Premises and representation:** The first counterexample combines openPolicy with an empty work list despite an applicable system assessment. The second retains actualSystem, actual and its charter, but substitutes true cost-allowance evidence for the output-capability claim. jointWitness uses the matching capability evidence and complete owned work instead. + +**Proof or check:** generationNotReflexivity derives the missing applicable work from a supposed Reflexive proof. charterNotGrounds keeps a wrong-output world compatible with the cost record. jointWitness supplies one actual pair with admissibility, charter, capability duty, justified choice and each commitment’s grounds. + +**Limits:** These results establish the stated separations and coexistence, not complete pairwise logical independence of all commitments, a priority hierarchy, or automatic grounds for every charter-compliant claim. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean:257](#line-code-leanified-corereader-agency-lean-257) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem generationNotReflexivity : + Generative openPolicy ∧ ¬ Reflexive 0 (ownRules 0) [] := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:577](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-577) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem charterNotGrounds : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ + Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:595](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-595) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem jointWitness : + ∃ s : System, ∃ w : World, + Admissible (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) w ∧ Charter s w ∧ + OwnCapabilityDuty s w [capabilityFacet] ∧ systemCapability s w ∧ + JustifiedChoice s.requirements (s.method.realize w) objectiveReason ∧ + (∀ c : Commitment, Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c]) ∧ + s = actualSystem ∧ w = actual := by +``` + + + +## T27 · Application duties and individual reasons + +An application that satisfies the adopted ApplicationDuties retains Reflexive work and all actually applicable, correctly articulated grounds for its own contract claim. Each of the five shared commitments separately has matched value grounds, joint adoption and relevant criticism, while its waive variant fails the chosen procedure. In the registered variation, the same evidence still supports the identity contract but does not support the changed successor contract. + +**Premises and representation:** applicationRetainsDuties takes a System, World, Requirements, arbitrary contract, facet-indexed articulations, applicability predicate and facet list, and assumes ApplicationDuties for those exact parameters. reasonsBelongToCommitments takes one of generation, consistency, reflexivity, grounds or choice; each position shares the governance choice but has its own actual consequence, reasons, constraints and criticism. + +**Proof or check:** The application theorem projects the assumed obligation, including same-claim equality and FacetArticulated for every listed facet. The commitment theorem constructs canonical grounds and joint witnesses, checks nonvacuous criticism, and contrasts apply with waive using actual operation expansion, contradiction handling, self-test coverage, evidence acceptance and implementation decisions. The supplementary applicationVariation case holds the system and observation fixed: the identity contract has matching grounds, whereas the successor contract fails at actual input 0 and its attempted empirical facet is rejected. + +**Limits:** The general application result does not prove arbitrary applications comply. The five reasons belong to distinct commitment positions in one selected option/outcome adapter; their checks do not derive normative authority from facts or prove all possible value reasons deductively sufficient. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:529](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-529) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem applicationRetainsDuties (s : System) (w : World) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) + (h : ApplicationDuties s w req contract articulations applicable facets) : + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (∀ f, applicable f → f ∈ facets) ∧ + (∀ f ∈ facets, f.claim = applicationClaim s req contract ∧ + Articulated (articulations f) ∧ FacetArticulated (articulations f) f ∧ FacetDischarged f) := +``` + +### `CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:423](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-423) · theorem + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Classical.choice`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem reasonsBelongToCommitments (c : Commitment) : + Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c] ∧ + JointAdoption (commitmentPosition c) ∧ + (commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor c .waive) := by +``` + +### `CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean:556](#line-code-leanified-corereader-integration-lean-556) · supplementary case + +Core dependencies: `propext`, `Quot.sound`. + +```lean +theorem applicationVariation : + ApplicationDuties actualSystem actual identityRequirements outputContract + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet] ∧ + ¬ applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds (applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract) + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = changedObjectiveFacet) [changedObjectiveFacet] := by +``` + + + +## T28 · Assessment without observation tests + +A matched inferential assessment can have Grounds without an observation test, while a separately applicable empirical facet still uses observations. + +**Premises and representation:** The inferential facet explicitly assumes n = 2 and concludes n + 1 = 3, with canonical articulation and a nonempty model. The empirical comparison is the actual switch observation facet; usesObservation classifies the facet form. + +**Proof or check:** nonExecutableAssessment builds Grounds for the arithmetic claim from its satisfiable premise and semantic entailment, proves usesObservation is false there, and includes the discharged empirical switch facet with usesObservation true. + +**Limits:** The theorem separates assessment from observational testing; it does not prove this arithmetic reasoning uncomputable, classify every non-executable method or waive applicable empirical responsibilities. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.terms#p1](#source-organon-relationships-terms-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +### `CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment` + +[leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean:840](#line-code-leanified-corereader-evidence-lean-840) · case + +Core dependencies: `propext`. + +```lean +theorem nonExecutableAssessment : + Grounds (fun n : Nat => n + 1 = 3) canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = arithmeticFacet) [arithmeticFacet] ∧ + usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false ∧ + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ usesObservation switchEmpirical = true := by +``` + + +## Source tracing appendix + + + + +### `organon.preamble#p1` + +```text +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: passed; fidelity: not_applicable. + + + +This paragraph is cited as authority and interpretive context. The linked declarations do not prove the meta-level statement; its conditions remain in force. + +This declares textual authority and adopted-commitment scope, not a mathematical proposition about all systems. The review retains this boundary without manufacturing a Lean theorem of authority. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02). + + + + + + +### `organon.preamble#p2` + +```text +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](rationale/README.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The shared model exhibits compatible constraints without a chapter-priority inference. Authority of meanings and limits, the role of Rationale and revisability of actual skills remain textual commitments outside this finite witness. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter` + +```text + + +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned. + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p1` + +```text +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +This is a structural list of three headings. It organizes substantive provisions and requires no fabricated theorem. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p2` + +```text +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +jointWitness combines valued expansion, revisability, contextual consistency and contentful owned principle work in one inhabited system. It proves model satisfiability, not actual compliance by arbitrary systems. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02), [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p3` + +```text +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The three requirements remain distinct predicates with a shared example and specific nonentailments. Their interpretation as philosophical obligations and their full conditions in arbitrary applications are not derived from the example. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02), [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1` + +```text +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Generative specifies valuation and revisability of current forms. The finite tags and state examples do not characterize every form of understanding, construction or intrinsic orientation. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1` + +```text +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The neutral-policy counterexample separates permission for distinct versions from the adopted valuation predicate. It does not establish what every real system values or justify the adopted value universally. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T04](#t04). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1` + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +All five represented form kinds, including organization, method and principle, fall under conditional revisability; a constant trace shows no progress guarantee. The chosen representation is not an exhaustive ontology or an executed revision. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T05](#t05). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1` + +```text +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The same before/after states increase inventory, abstraction and vocabulary without adding represented capabilities. Actual performance records can distinguish a genuine extension in a two-case world; empirical reliability beyond that world is not proved. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T06](#t06), [T07](#t07). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2` + +```text +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Bound execution exhibits separate external dependencies, grounded stability, a nonimproving trace and a refuted owned announcement. These are finite compatibility and failure examples; philosophical adoption and real autonomous development remain outside their conclusions. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T06](#t06), [T07](#t07). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency#p1` + +```text +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The general semantic theorem prevents opposite consequences under one theory/context when an admissible world exists. Existence of such a world, choice of questions and interpretation of held judgments are explicit modeling conditions, not guaranteed for reality. + +Related targets: [T08](#t08). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1` + +```text +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Concrete retraction slices can reverse judgments, and a conditional reporting specification disallows concealing recognized change. No automatic detector, adequate report generator or real revision history is established. + +Related targets: [T09](#t09), [T10](#t10). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2` + +```text +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Separate assumption, meaning and scope changes admit different judgments; hidden changes fail the adopted report condition. This covers explicit semantic models, not every practical ambiguity or method of concealment. + +Related targets: [T09](#t09), [T10](#t10). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1` + +```text +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Finite witnesses distinguish tension from contradiction and consistency from truth or completeness. Refusing to retain a demonstrated conflict is a conditional consequence of an adopted consistency requirement, not an implemented revision strategy. + +Related targets: [T11](#t11), [T12](#t12). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity#p1` + +```text +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Reflexive quantifies applicable owned rules and subjects, with coherent keys and meaningful application records. The concrete rule set has generation and assessment work but does not cover every possible real principle. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1` + +```text +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The revised module models formation purposes, requested applicability scopes and revision counterexamples with actual evaluation and generation outcomes. These finite inquiry contracts do not establish the correctness or completeness of every assessment methodology. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1` + +```text +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Applicability is retained, self-exemption fails where conditions hold, and finite self-tests plus a produced revision fail to establish universal support. The owned records and source identities are mathematical objects, not authenticated execution histories. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13), [T14](#t14). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds#p1` + +```text +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Grounds checks identified applicable facets of the same claim; support, entailment and an option-indexed value procedure carry distinct responsibilities. This is a chosen formal interface and finite fulfillment examples, not a universal sufficient criterion for all philosophical grounds. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T15](#t15). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p1` + +```text +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Articulation content is linked to each facet and separated from its discharge; union and missing-aspect examples prevent labels from waiving represented duties. Identifying every actually relevant aspect remains an application responsibility not solved by the datatype. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p2` + +```text +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The three modeled adapters check observational compatibility/support, semantic entailment, and value reasons with limits/consequences/criticism. Actual relevance, empirical uncertainty and the adequacy of value criticism beyond the chosen cases are not exhaustively formalized. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p3` + +```text +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +JointAdoption requires consistent instantiated starting commitments without proving all starting assumptions. A two-reason example and heterogeneous facets avoid a universal numerical scale. They demonstrate procedural consistency, not ultimate value justification. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p1` + +```text +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A proper local observation scope supports a local function claim while admitting a counterexample outside it. This establishes the specified nonentailment; it neither identifies all relevant real differences nor rules out justified wider evidence. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p2` + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Repeated irrelevant measurements fail support, while a valid inferential assessment needs no empirical chain. This refutes a universal mandatory chain within the represented responsibilities but does not characterize every framework or measurement practice. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p3` + +```text +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A single observation has limited support and distinct trial outcomes preserve a fixed bound. Verification, reproducible conditions and conclusion stability use separate predicates; no probability distribution or general reproducibility law is proved. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.capabilities#p1` + +```text +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Output-only and explanation-bearing contracts concern the same process and each has its own checked Grounds; applicationVariation changes the actual objective and invalidates old evidence. No uniform real mastery or capability-level definition is derived. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T21](#t21). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.capabilities#p2` + +```text +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A distinct assessor role supplies a proof about the exact output process while no explanation certificate is attached; duplicating four inventory kinds leaves represented capability unchanged. Role numbers and certificates do not prove external provenance or human-like understanding. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T21](#t21). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations#p1` + +```text +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The adopted choice interface requires feasibility and an objective/value/constraint-linked reason and rejects status-only reasons. Its finite reason vocabulary and concrete feasibility checks do not supply a general theory of warranted real implementation choice. + +Related targets: [T22](#t22), [T23](#t23). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations#p2` + +```text +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Two independent policies share a correct negative audit but differ on the added choice norm, establishing independence from the represented assessment procedure. This does not show an unsupported priority claim fully satisfies general Grounds, or derive a value commitment from neutral facts. + +Related targets: [T22](#t22), [T23](#t23). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1` + +```text +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Concrete cases have one feasible candidate, unequal implementations, local agreement with wider difference and four eligible internal reasons. A cheap wrong-output method shows eligibility alone is insufficient. These results concern selected candidates and contracts, not all methods. + +Related targets: [T24](#t24). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships` + +```text + + +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned. + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p1` + +```text +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +One shared model combines the charter and Grounds and assigns five commitments distinct operational reasons, limits and live criticism. Specified nonentailments prevent chapter order from doing logical work; neither the universal adoption nor ultimate justification of all commitments follows. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p2` + +```text +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Consistency/support and orientation/capability remain separate; changing an application objective changes its actual claim and can defeat retained evidence. Universal application compliance is only an assumed conditional interface, not an achieved fact. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p3` + +```text +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Contentful self-application, exact own-capability assessment, the general Grounds provision and the same current philosophy method are linked in the model. Their checked coexistence supplies no self-proof, real execution guarantee or unconditional applicability. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.terms#p1` + +```text +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +FormKind includes organization, methods and principles, and an inferential assessment has no executable-test requirement. These representations illustrate the terms without exhaustively defining every existing form or every non-test assessment. + +Related targets: [T05](#t05), [T28](#t28). + + + +## Complete code and line explanations + +Each file retains its exact checked contents. These line explanations are informed translations of the revised object; the initial blind account and rejected earlier judgments are retained separately. + + +### `leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean` + + +```lean +import CoreReader.Reflexivity + +namespace CoreReader.Agency + +inductive FormKind | organization | method | principle | appearance | artifact + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +structure Form where + kind : FormKind + version : Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Aim | expandUnderstandingAndConstruction | preserveSafeOperation + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A policy records an adopted valuation, current forms, and permission. It does not assert that valuation is correct or enacted. -/ +structure Policy where + worthPursuing : Aim → Prop + current : Form → Prop + revisable : Form → Prop + permitsVersion : Nat → Nat → Prop + +/- The normative specification keeps valuation and revisability separate from realized transitions. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.Generative +organon.charter.overview#p2 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.charter.overview#p3 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1 sha256 f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0 +organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1 sha256 7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf +organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 sha256 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8 +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +-/ +def Generative (p : Policy) : Prop := + p.worthPursuing .expandUnderstandingAndConstruction ∧ + ∀ f, p.current f → p.revisable f + +def openPolicy : Policy where + worthPursuing a := a = .expandUnderstandingAndConstruction ∨ a = .preserveSafeOperation + current f := f.version = 0 + revisable _ := True + permitsVersion _ _ := True + +def neutralPolicy : Policy := { openPolicy with worthPursuing := fun _ => False } + +/- Permitting a real version change does not supply an adopted value position. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation +organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1 sha256 7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf +-/ +theorem permissionNotValuation : + neutralPolicy.permitsVersion 0 1 ∧ (0 : Nat) ≠ 1 ∧ ¬ Generative neutralPolicy := by + simp [neutralPolicy, openPolicy, Generative] + +/- This is an explicit consequence of the adopted specification, not evidence of actual revision. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers +organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 sha256 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8 +organon.relationships.terms#p1 sha256 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1 +-/ +theorem revisabilityCovers (p : Policy) (h : Generative p) (k : FormKind) (v : Nat) + (hc : p.current ⟨k, v⟩) : p.revisable ⟨k, v⟩ := h.2 _ hc + +inductive Operation | copy | successor + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def Operation.run : Operation → Nat → Nat + | .copy, n => n + | .successor, n => n + 1 + +inductive InventoryKind | document | term | tool | artifact + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +structure Item where + kind : InventoryKind + content : Operation + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- Available represented operations are the contents present, not their number of occurrences. -/ +def Available (xs : List Item) (op : Operation) : Prop := + ∃ item ∈ xs, item.content = op + +/- Duplicating any inventory category preserves exactly the represented operation content. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem inventoryNotCapability (kind : InventoryKind) (ops : List Operation) (op : Operation) : + Available ((ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x) ++ (ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x)) op ↔ + Available (ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x) op := by + simp only [Available, List.mem_append] + constructor + · rintro ⟨x, hx | hx, hop⟩ <;> exact ⟨x, hx, hop⟩ + · rintro ⟨x, hx, hop⟩ + exact ⟨x, Or.inl hx, hop⟩ + +structure State where + understood : List Operation + constructed : List Operation + inventory : List Item + abstractionLayers : List Operation + vocabulary : List Operation + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A gain must identify an operation newly understood or constructed; this is a disclosed finite capability representation. -/ +def Expanded (before after : State) : Prop := + (∃ op, op ∈ after.understood ∧ op ∉ before.understood) ∨ + (∃ op, op ∈ after.constructed ∧ op ∉ before.constructed) + +def baseState : State := + ⟨[.copy], [.copy], [⟨.artifact, .copy⟩], [.copy], [.copy]⟩ + +def inflatedState : State := + { baseState with + inventory := baseState.inventory ++ baseState.inventory + abstractionLayers := [.copy, .copy] + vocabulary := [.copy, .copy] } + +def stableTrace (_time : Nat) : State := baseState + +/- A revisable policy can govern an unchanged trace; no improvement is hidden in revisability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress +organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 sha256 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8 +organon.relationships.terms#p1 sha256 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1 +-/ +theorem revisionWithoutProgress : + Generative openPolicy ∧ + (∀ k : FormKind, openPolicy.revisable ⟨k, 0⟩) ∧ + (∀ t, ¬ Expanded (stableTrace t) (stableTrace (t + 1))) := by + simp [Generative, openPolicy, stableTrace, Expanded] + +structure ExternalResources where + experience : Option Nat + knowledge : Option Nat + collaborator : Option Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- This interpreter actually needs all three external inputs to produce the modeled result. -/ +def assistedExecution (r : ExternalResources) : Option Nat := do + let e ← r.experience + let k ← r.knowledge + let c ← r.collaborator + pure (Operation.copy.run (e + k + c)) + +def availableResources : ExternalResources := ⟨some 1, some 2, some 3⟩ + +/- Stability has a concrete stated reason in this workload: preserve its operation while staying within the one-item budget. -/ +def StableReason (before proposed : State) : Prop := + before.constructed = proposed.constructed ∧ + before.inventory.length ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ proposed.inventory.length ≤ 1 + +/- The policy, current capabilities, execution interface and workload constraints belong to one generating system. -/ +structure GeneratingSystem where + owner : Nat + policy : Policy + current : State + execute : ExternalResources → Option Nat + applicationBudget : Nat + requiredOperations : List Operation +/- The modeled system uses the assisted interpreter under a one-item budget and a copy-operation requirement. -/ +def generatingSystem : GeneratingSystem where + owner := 0 + policy := openPolicy + current := baseState + execute := assistedExecution + applicationBudget := 1 + requiredOperations := [.copy] +/- A stable action retains this system's own current state. -/ +def GeneratingSystem.stableAction (system : GeneratingSystem) : State := system.current +def GeneratingSystem.requirementsMet (system : GeneratingSystem) (state : State) : Prop := + ∀ operation, operation ∈ system.requiredOperations → operation ∈ state.constructed +def GeneratingSystem.withinBudget (system : GeneratingSystem) (state : State) : Prop := + state.inventory.length ≤ system.applicationBudget +/- An expansion report identifies the actual before/after states and the operation/performance it asserts was added. -/ +structure Announcement where + owner : Nat + before : State + after : State + reportedNewOperation : Operation + input : Nat + expectedOutput : Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr +/- Reports are generated by this system and identify its actual current state as their baseline. -/ +def GeneratingSystem.report (system : GeneratingSystem) (after : State) + (operation : Operation) (input expectedOutput : Nat) : Announcement := + ⟨system.owner, system.current, after, operation, input, expectedOutput⟩ +/- Report content is interpreted against those very states and the named operation's actual behavior. -/ +def Announcement.claim (report : Announcement) : Prop := + report.reportedNewOperation ∈ report.after.constructed ∧ + report.reportedNewOperation ∉ report.before.constructed ∧ + report.reportedNewOperation.run report.input = report.expectedOutput +/- A true report of this form entails a represented construction expansion. -/ +theorem announcementClaimImpliesExpansion (report : Announcement) (h : report.claim) : + Expanded report.before report.after := Or.inr ⟨report.reportedNewOperation, h.1, h.2.1⟩ +/- This concrete self-report asserts a successor operation for the actual inventory-only inflation. -/ +def inflatedAnnouncement : Announcement := generatingSystem.report inflatedState .successor 0 1 +/- The report asserts a real successor result but its named operation is absent from its own after-state. -/ +theorem inflatedAnnouncementRefuted : + inflatedAnnouncement.before = baseState ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.after = inflatedState ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.reportedNewOperation = .successor ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.input = 0 ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.expectedOutput = 1 ∧ + ¬ inflatedAnnouncement.claim ∧ ¬ Expanded inflatedAnnouncement.before inflatedAnnouncement.after := by + simp [inflatedAnnouncement, GeneratingSystem.report, generatingSystem, Announcement.claim, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + +/- These transitions share one initial state; only extension adds an actual new operation. -/ +inductive TransitionCase | inflate | extend + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def extendedState : State := + { baseState with understood := [.copy, .successor], constructed := [.copy, .successor] } +def transitionBefore (_transition : TransitionCase) : State := baseState +def transitionAfter : TransitionCase → State + | .inflate => inflatedState + | .extend => extendedState +/- Both alternatives are assessed under the same concrete input condition. -/ +def transitionInput (_transition : TransitionCase) : Nat := 0 +def transitionAnnouncement (transition : TransitionCase) : Announcement := + generatingSystem.report (transitionAfter transition) .successor (transitionInput transition) 1 + +/- Eleven boundary branches share a content-bearing trace and executable dependency model. They do not assert a universal law of human capability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +-/ +theorem generationLimits : + Generative generatingSystem.policy ∧ + generatingSystem.policy.permitsVersion 0 0 ∧ + ¬ Expanded generatingSystem.current inflatedState ∧ + generatingSystem.current.inventory.length < inflatedState.inventory.length ∧ + generatingSystem.current.abstractionLayers.length < inflatedState.abstractionLayers.length ∧ + generatingSystem.current.vocabulary.length < inflatedState.vocabulary.length ∧ + generatingSystem.execute availableResources = some 6 ∧ + generatingSystem.execute { availableResources with experience := none } = none ∧ + generatingSystem.execute { availableResources with knowledge := none } = none ∧ + generatingSystem.execute { availableResources with collaborator := none } = none ∧ + generatingSystem.execute ⟨none, none, none⟩ = none ∧ + ¬ Expanded generatingSystem.current generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + generatingSystem.stableAction = generatingSystem.current ∧ + generatingSystem.requirementsMet generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + generatingSystem.withinBudget generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + ¬ generatingSystem.withinBudget inflatedState ∧ + StableReason generatingSystem.current inflatedState ∧ + (inflatedAnnouncement = generatingSystem.report inflatedState .successor 0 1 ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.owner = generatingSystem.owner ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.before = generatingSystem.current ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.after = inflatedState ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.reportedNewOperation = .successor ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.input = 0 ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.expectedOutput = 1 ∧ + ¬ inflatedAnnouncement.claim ∧ ¬ Expanded inflatedAnnouncement.before inflatedAnnouncement.after) := by + simp [generatingSystem, GeneratingSystem.stableAction, GeneratingSystem.requirementsMet, + GeneratingSystem.withinBudget, GeneratingSystem.report, Generative, openPolicy, Expanded, + baseState, inflatedState, assistedExecution, availableResources, Operation.run, + StableReason, inflatedAnnouncement, Announcement.claim] + +/- The empty work log omits an actually applicable system assessment despite an open generative policy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem generationNotReflexivity : + Generative openPolicy ∧ ¬ Reflexive 0 (ownRules 0) [] := by + constructor + · simp [Generative, openPolicy] + · intro h + have bad := noSelfExemption 0 (ownRules 0) [] h (assessingRule 0) (by simp [ownRules]) + (.system 0) rfl (by simp [assessingRule, ownSubjects]) + simp [Performed] at bad + +/- The same proposed arithmetic principle is used in the self-test and in the universal correctness claim. -/ +def ownArithmeticPrinciple (n : Nat) : Bool := decide (n + 1 = 2 * n) + +def selfTest (samples : List Nat) : Bool := samples.all ownArithmeticPrinciple + +/- A genuine evaluation on the selected sample succeeds, while the same principle fails at zero. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem selfTestDoesNotProve : + selfTest [1] = true ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false ∧ + ¬ (∀ n, ownArithmeticPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · decide + constructor + · decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + contradiction + +end CoreReader.Agency +``` + + + + **L1** Imports CoreReader.Reflexivity and its dependencies into this module. + + + **L3** Opens namespace CoreReader.Agency; file boundaries do not change declaration identity. + + + **L5** Defines exactly five form tags; their names carry no additional semantics. + + + **L6** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L8** A form is a kind tag and a natural-number version. + + + **L9** Stores whether this form is an organization, method, principle, appearance or artifact. + + + **L10** Stores a natural-number form version; it does not prove any change occurred. + + + **L11** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L13** Defines two aim tags: expanding understanding/construction and preserving safe operation; the datatype alone does not value either aim. + + + **L14** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L16** Documents the following definition or result: A policy supplies four unrelated predicate fields; no law ties version permission to valuation or revisability. + + + **L17** A policy supplies four unrelated predicate fields; no law ties version permission to valuation or revisability. + + + **L18** Specifies which of the two represented aims this policy regards as worth pursuing. + + + **L19** Specifies the form kind/version pairs currently held by this policy. + + + **L20** Specifies which form kind/version pairs this policy leaves revisable. + + + **L21** Specifies permission between version numbers independently of actual execution. + + + **L23** Documents the following definition or result: A policy satisfies this predicate when it values the designated expansion aim and declares every current form revisable. This states no actual progress condition. + + + **L24** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.Generative to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L25** Records source reference organon.charter.overview#p2 with content digest 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L26** Records source reference organon.charter.overview#p3 with content digest 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L27** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1 with content digest f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L28** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1 with content digest 7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L29** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 with content digest 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L30** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 with content digest 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L31** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 with content digest 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L32** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L33** A policy satisfies this predicate when it values the designated expansion aim and declares every current form revisable. This states no actual progress condition. + + + **L34** Requires this policy to value expanding understanding and construction. + + + **L35** Requires every form currently held by this policy to remain revisable. + + + **L37** Constructs a policy valuing both aims, selecting version zero, and permitting every revision and version pair. + + + **L38** Values both expansion and preserving safe operation in openPolicy. + + + **L39** Treats precisely version-zero forms as current, regardless of kind. + + + **L40** Allows revision of every form, including forms not currently held. + + + **L41** Permits every pair of version numbers; this does not execute a change. + + + **L43** Copies the open policy but makes every aim unworthy of pursuit; the permission fields are unchanged. + + + **L45** Documents the following definition or result: Shows permission for version 0 to 1 and distinct versions coexist with failure of the generation predicate. + + + **L46** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L47** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1 with content digest 7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L48** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L49** Shows permission for version 0 to 1 and distinct versions coexist with failure of the generation predicate. + + + **L50** States that neutralPolicy permits 0→1, the versions differ, and its missing valuation defeats Generative. + + + **L51** Unfolds the two policies: permission is true, 0≠1 computes true, and the required valuation is false. + + + **L53** Documents the following definition or result: Extracts revisability of a specified current kind/version from an assumed generation predicate; it does not revise that form. + + + **L54** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L55** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 with content digest 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L56** Records source reference organon.relationships.terms#p1 with content digest 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L57** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L58** Extracts revisability of a specified current kind/version from an assumed generation predicate; it does not revise that form. + + + **L59** Uses h's revisability clause on the same kind/version form that hc identifies as current. + + + **L61** Defines the only two encoded operations: identity and successor on natural numbers. + + + **L62** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L64** Interprets an operation as a function on natural numbers. + + + **L65** Executing copy returns its input unchanged. + + + **L66** Executing successor returns the input plus one. + + + **L68** Defines four inventory tags whose operational content is stored separately. + + + **L69** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L71** An inventory item consists of a tag and one of the two operations. + + + **L72** Classifies this inventory item as a document, term, tool or artifact. + + + **L73** Records the operation represented by this item, independently of its category. + + + **L74** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L76** Documents the following definition or result: Availability means that some item in the supplied list has exactly the requested operation as its content. + + + **L77** Availability means that some item in the supplied list has exactly the requested operation as its content. + + + **L78** An operation is available exactly when some listed item contains that operation. + + + **L80** Documents the following definition or result: Proves that duplicating a uniformly tagged list of operations does not change which operations are available. + + + **L81** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L82** Records source reference organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 with content digest 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L83** Records source reference organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 with content digest 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L84** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L85** Proves that duplicating a uniformly tagged list of operations does not change which operations are available. + + + **L86** Tests availability after duplicating the list of items built from ops and the fixed category. + + + **L87** Compares it with availability in the original single copy of that same list. + + + **L88** Expands availability and turns membership in the duplicated list into membership in either copy. + + + **L89** Proves both directions: duplication neither adds nor removes represented operations. + + + **L90** An item found in either copy is already an original-list witness for the same operation. + + + **L91** For the reverse direction, take an original item x with membership hx and matching content hop. + + + **L92** Places that same item in the first copy, preserving its matching operation. + + + **L94** A state is five lists; understanding and construction are represented only by membership in the two-operation datatype. + + + **L95** Lists operations represented as understood in this state. + + + **L96** Lists operations represented as constructed in this state. + + + **L97** Stores inventory items; their multiplicity is distinct from capability membership. + + + **L98** Stores abstraction-layer entries without identifying their count with understanding. + + + **L99** Stores vocabulary entries without identifying their count with constructed capability. + + + **L100** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L102** Documents the following definition or result: Expansion is the appearance of at least one previously absent operation in either understanding or construction. It allows losing other operations. + + + **L103** Expansion is the appearance of at least one previously absent operation in either understanding or construction. It allows losing other operations. + + + **L104** Expansion may be witnessed by an operation understood after the change but not before. + + + **L105** Alternatively, a newly constructed operation witnesses expansion. + + + **L107** Constructs a state with only copy in every operation list and one copy artifact. + + + **L108** The baseline understands and constructs copy, with one copy artifact, layer and vocabulary entry. + + + **L110** Constructs a larger inventory/layer/vocabulary state with unchanged understanding and construction. + + + **L111** Starts from baseState, retaining fields unless explicitly overwritten below. + + + **L112** Duplicates the one-item inventory while leaving understood and constructed operations unchanged. + + + **L113** Replaces one abstraction-layer entry with two copies of copy. + + + **L114** Similarly doubles the vocabulary list; no new operation is introduced. + + + **L116** Returns the same base state at every natural-number time. + + + **L118** Documents the following definition or result: Exhibits a policy meeting the generation interface and universal revisability while its independently chosen constant trace never expands. + + + **L119** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L120** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 with content digest 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L121** Records source reference organon.relationships.terms#p1 with content digest 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L122** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L123** Exhibits a policy meeting the generation interface and universal revisability while its independently chosen constant trace never expands. + + + **L124** Asserts openPolicy meets the adopted valuation-and-revisability specification. + + + **L125** Additionally exposes revision permission for version zero of every form category. + + + **L126** Every adjacent pair in the constant trace lacks a newly understood or constructed operation. + + + **L127** Reduces the policy clauses to true and every expansion claim to impossible new membership in an unchanged list. + + + **L129** Stores three optional natural numbers representing external-resource slots. + + + **L130** An optional external experience value; none makes assistedExecution fail at its first read. + + + **L131** An optional knowledge value required after the experience input. + + + **L132** An optional collaborator value required before producing the result. + + + **L133** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L135** Documents the following definition or result: An Option computation succeeds only when all three slots are present, then returns their sum through identity. This dependency is programmed into the example. + + + **L136** An Option computation succeeds only when all three slots are present, then returns their sum through identity. This dependency is programmed into the example. + + + **L137** Reads experience into e, immediately returning none when that resource is absent. + + + **L138** Reads knowledge into k; absence aborts the same Option computation. + + + **L139** Reads the collaborator's value into c, also propagating absence. + + + **L140** Returns the sum e+k+c through the copy operation inside some. + + + **L142** Provides resource values 1, 2 and 3 for the concrete success case. + + + **L144** Documents the following definition or result: Defines a particular non-growth reason: construction lists match, the old inventory has length at most one, and the proposed one exceeds one. + + + **L145** Defines a particular non-growth reason: construction lists match, the old inventory has length at most one, and the proposed one exceeds one. + + + **L146** A reason to retain the old state requires both states to have exactly the same constructed operations. + + + **L147** The old inventory must fit the one-item limit while the proposed inventory exceeds it. + + + **L149** Documents the following definition or result: Binds one owner's policy, current state, resource-dependent executor, budget and required operations. + + + **L150** Binds one owner's policy, current state, resource-dependent executor, budget and required operations. + + + **L151** Identifies the owner of this generating system. + + + **L152** Attaches the valuation and revisability policy to this same system. + + + **L153** Stores the system's current represented capability and inventory state. + + + **L154** Stores this system's actual resource-consuming execution function. + + + **L155** Specifies the inventory-size budget used to evaluate stable and proposed states. + + + **L156** Specifies operations that the workload requires to remain constructed. + + + **L157** Documents the following definition or result: Instantiates owner zero with the open policy, base state, three-slot executor, budget one and required copy operation. + + + **L158** Instantiates owner zero with the open policy, base state, three-slot executor, budget one and required copy operation. + + + **L159** Assigns owner identifier zero to the concrete generating system. + + + **L160** Installs openPolicy in that same concrete system. + + + **L161** Sets its current capabilities and inventory to baseState. + + + **L162** Uses the three-resource assisted interpreter as this system's execution interface. + + + **L163** Sets this workload's inventory budget to exactly one item. + + + **L164** Requires the concrete workload to preserve the copy operation. + + + **L165** Documents the following definition or result: Returns this system's current state as its stability-preserving action. + + + **L166** Returns this system's current state as its stability-preserving action. + + + **L167** Checks every operation required by this same system is constructed in the assessed state. + + + **L168** For this system and proposed state, every required operation must occur in the state's constructed list. + + + **L169** Compares the assessed state's inventory length against this system's declared budget. + + + **L170** Checks the state's inventory count against this same system's declared application budget. + + + **L171** Documents the following definition or result: Stores reporting owner, exact before/after states, claimed new operation, tested input and expected output. + + + **L172** Stores reporting owner, exact before/after states, claimed new operation, tested input and expected output. + + + **L173** Records whose expansion announcement this is. + + + **L174** Stores the exact baseline state named by the announcement. + + + **L175** Stores the exact resulting state named by the announcement. + + + **L176** Names the operation alleged to be newly constructed. + + + **L177** Fixes the input at which the announced operation's behavior is claimed. + + + **L178** Stores the claimed output of that operation at the stated input. + + + **L179** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L180** Documents the following definition or result: Builds a report from this system's owner/current state and the supplied proposal and operation contract. + + + **L181** Builds a report from this system's owner/current state and the supplied proposal and operation contract. + + + **L182** Receives the allegedly new operation and the concrete input/output pair for this report. + + + **L183** Builds a report tied to the system's owner and current baseline, using the supplied after-state and claim data. + + + **L184** Documents the following definition or result: Requires the reported operation to be newly constructed and to produce the stated output at the stated input. + + + **L185** Requires the reported operation to be newly constructed and to produce the stated output at the stated input. + + + **L186** The reported new operation must actually occur in the announcement's after-state. + + + **L187** The same operation must be absent from the announcement's baseline constructed list. + + + **L188** Its actual run at the reported input must equal the announced expected output. + + + **L189** Documents the following definition or result: Uses the genuinely new constructed operation from an assumed report claim as the expansion witness. + + + **L190** Uses the genuinely new constructed operation from an assumed report claim as the expansion witness. + + + **L191** Uses the claim's after-membership and before-absence to construct Expanded's construction branch. + + + **L192** Documents the following definition or result: This system reports successor at input zero for an inventory-only inflation proposal. + + + **L193** This system reports successor at input zero for an inventory-only inflation proposal. + + + **L194** Documents the following definition or result: Computes the exact report objects and shows its claimed new operation and actual expansion both fail. + + + **L195** Computes the exact report objects and shows its claimed new operation and actual expansion both fail. + + + **L196** Confirms the concrete announcement refers to baseState and inflatedState themselves. + + + **L197** Confirms the alleged new operation is successor. + + + **L198** Confirms the announced test is input zero with expected output one. + + + **L199** States both that the announcement's substantive claim fails and that its own state pair has no expansion. + + + **L200** Computes the report fields and unchanged capability lists; successor is absent from the after-state despite its correct 0→1 behavior. + + + **L202** Documents the following definition or result: Restricts the achievement model to inventory inflation and genuine operation extension. + + + **L203** Restricts the achievement model to inventory inflation and genuine operation extension. + + + **L204** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L206** Adds successor to the base state's understanding and construction lists. + + + **L207** Adds successor to both understood and constructed lists while retaining the baseline's other fields. + + + **L208** Both modeled transitions share the same base-state baseline. + + + **L209** Chooses inflatedState or extendedState according to the transition constructor. + + + **L210** The inflate transition ends at the inventory-only inflated state. + + + **L211** The extend transition ends at the state with newly understood and constructed successor. + + + **L212** Documents the following definition or result: Uses zero as the explicit tested input for both transition cases. + + + **L213** Uses zero as the explicit tested input for both transition cases. + + + **L214** Reports successor output one at input zero for this same system and selected after-state. + + + **L215** Both alternatives announce successor at the shared input zero, but name their own actual after-state. + + + **L217** Documents the following definition or result: Checks all concrete branches on the bound system: unchanged capability despite list inflation, resource dependence, justified stable action and an untrue same-object achievement report. + + + **L218** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L219** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 with content digest 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L220** Records source reference organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 with content digest 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L221** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L222** Checks all concrete branches on the bound system: unchanged capability despite list inflation, resource dependence, justified stable action and an untrue same-object achievement report. + + + **L223** The concrete system retains the adopted generative policy. + + + **L224** Its policy allows keeping version zero, so generativity does not require every action to change versions. + + + **L225** Inflating this system's inventory does not expand its represented capabilities. + + + **L226** The inflated state has strictly more inventory entries than this system's current state. + + + **L227** Its abstraction-layer count also strictly increases without capability expansion. + + + **L228** Its vocabulary count strictly increases under the same unchanged capability content. + + + **L229** With resources 1,2,3, this system's execution actually returns some 6. + + + **L230** Removing experience from that same resource bundle makes the system's execution fail. + + + **L231** Removing knowledge alone likewise makes its execution return none. + + + **L232** Removing the collaborator input alone also makes execution fail. + + + **L233** With all three external inputs absent, this same execution interface returns none. + + + **L234** The system's stable action yields no represented capability expansion. + + + **L235** That stable action is exactly retention of the system's current state. + + + **L236** Retention preserves the workload's required copy operation. + + + **L237** The retained one-item state fits this system's one-item application budget. + + + **L238** The duplicated inventory has two entries and exceeds this same system's one-item budget. + + + **L239** Stability has the stated reason: construction is unchanged, but only the current state fits the budget. + + + **L240** Identifies the report as this system's announcement about inflatedState, successor, input zero and output one. + + + **L241** The report's owner equals this generating system's owner. + + + **L242** The report uses this system's current state as baseline and inflatedState as result. + + + **L243** The operation this actual report calls new is successor. + + + **L244** The report's claimed performance remains the concrete pair 0→1. + + + **L245** Despite that report, its claim is false and its own before/after pair has no capability expansion. + + + **L246** Begins computing all generationLimits clauses by exposing the concrete system, retention action and required-operation check. + + + **L247** Also exposes the one-item budget, report constructor and policy/expansion predicates so their claims reduce to concrete data. + + + **L248** Uses the actual baseline/inflated lists and three-resource interpreter to decide the size, membership and execution results. + + + **L249** Finally unfolds the stability reason and owned announcement claim, completing all conjunction branches by computation. + + + **L251** Documents the following definition or result: Exhibits a policy meeting generation while empty records fail the nonempty concrete reflexivity requirements. + + + **L252** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L253** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L254** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L255** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L256** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L257** Exhibits a policy meeting generation while empty records fail the nonempty concrete reflexivity requirements. + + + **L258** Combines a generative openPolicy with failure of owned reflexivity when the work log is empty. + + + **L259** Separates establishing Generative from refuting the empty-log Reflexive claim. + + + **L260** Computes openPolicy's expansion valuation and unconditional revisability. + + + **L261** Assumes, for contradiction, that the empty log satisfies the owned reflexivity contract. + + + **L262** Applies noSelfExemption to the registered assessingRule, forcing a performed assessment from the assumed empty-log compliance. + + + **L263** Chooses the very system subject with matching owner and proves that assessment is applicable to it. + + + **L264** Unfolding Performed reveals an impossible member of the empty work list. + + + **L266** Documents the following definition or result: Decides the arithmetic equation n+1=2*n for each natural number. + + + **L267** Decides the arithmetic equation n+1=2*n for each natural number. + + + **L269** Returns true precisely when the equation holds at every listed sample; no unlisted input is tested. + + + **L271** Documents the following definition or result: Computes success on sample 1 and failure at 0, refuting universal success. This concerns the particular arithmetic predicate, not a universal impossibility theorem about all self-tests. + + + **L272** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L273** Records source reference organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 with content digest ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L274** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L275** Computes success on sample 1 and failure at 0, refuting universal success. This concerns the particular arithmetic predicate, not a universal impossibility theorem about all self-tests. + + + **L276** The same arithmetic principle passes sample 1 but evaluates false at 0. + + + **L277** Therefore that principle does not return true for every natural-number input. + + + **L278** Separates the passing sample computation from the two failure claims. + + + **L279** Evaluates the singleton sample: 1+1 equals 2×1, so selfTest [1] is true. + + + **L280** Separates the concrete failure at zero from refuting universal success. + + + **L281** Computes 0+1≠2×0, making ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 false. + + + **L282** Assumes the same principle succeeds for every input. + + + **L283** Specializes that universal assumption to input zero. + + + **L284** Contradicts the computed false result at zero, refuting universal correctness. + + + **L286** Closes the current namespace. + + +### `leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean` + + +```lean +import CoreReader.Evidence + +namespace CoreReader.Choice +open CoreReader.Logic CoreReader.Evidence + +inductive StatusKind | name | convention | standing + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive MethodReason | output | explanation | applicability | simplicity | procedure + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Reason | status (kind : StatusKind) | method (kind : MethodReason) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- An implementation has observable behavior, a stated domain, an explanation formula and an execution trace. -/ +structure Implementation where + name : String + conventional : Bool + established : Bool + run : Nat → Nat + cost : Nat + domain : Nat → Prop + explanation : Nat → Nat + trace : Nat → List Nat + +/- An application selects relevant objectives and constraints; no universal ranking or score is prescribed. -/ +structure Requirements where + inputs : Nat → Prop + expected : Nat → Nat + budget : Nat + values : MethodReason → Prop + +/- These are explicit, content-based interpretations of possible method reasons in this application. -/ +def MethodContent (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : MethodReason → Prop + | .output => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.run x = req.expected x + | .explanation => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.explanation x = i.run x + | .applicability => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.domain x + | .simplicity => i.cost ≤ req.budget + | .procedure => ∀ x, req.inputs x → (i.trace x).getLast? = some (i.run x) + +/- The extra choice commitment requires both selected relevance and actual reason content; pure status supplies neither. -/ +def Relevant (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Reason → Prop + | .status _ => False + | .method kind => req.values kind ∧ MethodContent req i kind + +def Feasible (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Prop := + (∀ x, req.inputs x → i.run x = req.expected x) ∧ i.cost ≤ req.budget + +/- In this application, a relevant reason is eligible only after its stated output and budget requirements hold. -/ +def JustifiedChoice (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Prop := + Feasible req i ∧ ∃ reason ∈ reasons, Relevant req i reason + +/- This proves the structural effect of the adopted choice commitment for each of its three status-only cases. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +-/ +theorem statusOnlyFails (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (k : StatusKind) : + ¬ JustifiedChoice req i [.status k] := by + rintro ⟨_, reason, hr, hv⟩ + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst reason + exact hv + +def identityImpl : Implementation where + name := "Existing identity implementation" + conventional := true + established := true + run n := n + cost := 1 + domain _ := True + explanation n := n + trace n := [n] + +def successorImpl : Implementation where + name := "Successor implementation" + conventional := false + established := false + run n := n + 1 + cost := 2 + domain _ := True + explanation n := n + 1 + trace n := [n, n + 1] + +def changedOutsideZero : Implementation := + { identityImpl with + name := "Changed outside zero" + conventional := false + established := false + run := fun n => if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1 + explanation := fun n => if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1 + trace := fun n => [if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1] } + +def identityRequirements : Requirements where + inputs _ := True + expected n := n + budget := 1 + values _ := True + +def objectiveReason : List Reason := [.method .output] + +theorem identityOutputReason : Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .output) := by + exact ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩ + +theorem identityFeasible : Feasible identityRequirements identityImpl := + ⟨fun _ _ => rfl, by decide⟩ + +theorem identityJustified : JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason := + ⟨identityFeasible, .method .output, by simp [objectiveReason], identityOutputReason⟩ + +/- A conventional existing implementation can be selected for an actual requirement, not for status alone. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +-/ +theorem conventionWithReason : + identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ identityImpl.established = true ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .convention, .method .output] := by + exact ⟨rfl, rfl, identityFeasible, .method .output, by simp, identityOutputReason⟩ + +inductive Candidate | identity | successor + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def implementation : Candidate → Implementation + | .identity => identityImpl + | .successor => successorImpl + +/- Feasibility is decided by the same stated behavior and resource requirement for either candidate. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem singleFeasible : + (∀ candidate, Feasible identityRequirements (implementation candidate) ↔ candidate = .identity) ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason := by + constructor + · intro candidate + cases candidate + · simp [Feasible, identityRequirements, implementation, identityImpl] + · simp [Feasible, identityRequirements, implementation, successorImpl] + · exact identityJustified + +/- The same observed input can conceal a relevant difference at another input. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem localNotGlobal : + (∀ x, x = 0 → identityImpl.run x = changedOutsideZero.run x) ∧ + identityImpl.run 1 ≠ changedOutsideZero.run 1 := by + constructor + · intro x hx; subst x; rfl + · decide + +/- This candidate is cheap enough but misses the required identity output. -/ +def cheapSuccessor : Implementation := { successorImpl with cost := 1 } + +theorem eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient : + Relevant identityRequirements cheapSuccessor (.method .simplicity) ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] := by + refine ⟨⟨trivial, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h.1.1 0 trivial + cases bad + +/- Each of the four internal-method reasons is eligible because of its actual selected requirement and content. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem internalReasons : + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .explanation) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .applicability) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .simplicity) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .procedure) ∧ + (Relevant identityRequirements cheapSuccessor (.method .simplicity) ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity]) := by + exact ⟨⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => trivial⟩, + ⟨trivial, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient⟩ + +/- Openness about reasons does not make two actual behaviors identical or reject the existing implementation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem openNotEquivalent : + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason ∧ + identityImpl.run 0 ≠ successorImpl.run 0 := by + exact ⟨identityJustified, by decide⟩ + +/- A priority interpretation chooses one of the same two actual implementations. -/ +def priorityClaim : Claim Candidate := fun selected => selected = .identity + +def statusFacts : Theory Candidate := union + (singleton (fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true)) + (singleton (fun _ => identityImpl.established = true)) + +/- Both interpretations have exactly the same true conventional and established status facts. -/ +theorem statusFactsModel (selected : Candidate) : Models statusFacts selected := by + exact (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩ + +def priorityArticulation : Articulation Candidate := + ⟨["priority", "conventional use", "established status"], statusFacts, + [fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true, fun _ => identityImpl.established = true], + fun _ => True⟩ + +/- This procedure reports whether the actual status premises entail that very priority claim over its stated two-candidate scope. -/ +def AssessmentAccurate (report : Bool) : Prop := + report = true ↔ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim + +theorem statusDoesNotEntailPriority : ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim := by + intro h + have bad := h .successor (statusFactsModel .successor) + cases bad + +theorem statusAssessmentNonEntailment : + Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusFacts selected) ∧ + priorityClaim .identity ∧ ¬ priorityClaim .successor ∧ + ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .standing] := by + refine ⟨⟨by simp [priorityArticulation], by simp [priorityArticulation]⟩, + ⟨(by intro h; cases h), (fun h => False.elim (statusDoesNotEntailPriority h))⟩, + statusFactsModel, rfl, (by intro h; cases h), statusDoesNotEntailPriority, + statusOnlyFails _ _ _⟩ + +/- An assessment identifies the exact premises and priority question whose entailment it reports. -/ +structure PriorityAssessment where + premises : Theory Candidate + question : Claim Candidate + report : Bool +/- Accuracy concerns the actual reported entailment question, independently of a later choice policy. -/ +def PriorityAssessment.accurate (assessment : PriorityAssessment) : Prop := + assessment.report = true ↔ Entails assessment.premises assessment.question +/- Both policies receive this same correctly negative status-only priority audit. -/ +def statusPriorityAudit : PriorityAssessment := ⟨statusFacts, priorityClaim, false⟩ +/- Priority reasons are a policy component independent of the assessment's report and objects. -/ +structure ChoicePolicy where + selected : Candidate + priorityReasons : List Reason + assessment : PriorityAssessment +/- This is completion of the specified assessment procedure only, not full compliance with philosophical Grounds. -/ +def GeneralAssessmentFulfilled (policy : ChoicePolicy) : Prop := + Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ policy.assessment = statusPriorityAudit ∧ policy.assessment.accurate +/- The additional choice norm separately tests the reasons actually used to prioritize the selected implementation. -/ +def AdditionalChoiceNorm (policy : ChoicePolicy) : Prop := + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements (implementation policy.selected) policy.priorityReasons +/- This policy retains status alone as its priority reason despite receiving the correctly negative status audit. -/ +def statusPriorityPolicy : ChoicePolicy := ⟨.identity, [.status .standing], statusPriorityAudit⟩ +/- This policy selects the same implementation using its actual relevant output reason after the same audit. -/ +def outputPriorityPolicy : ChoicePolicy := ⟨.identity, objectiveReason, statusPriorityAudit⟩ +/- The shared negative result is mathematically accurate for its actual status premises and question. -/ +theorem statusPriorityAuditAccurate : statusPriorityAudit.accurate := by + constructor + · intro h; cases h + · intro h; exact False.elim (statusDoesNotEntailPriority h) +/- These independently variable policies share facts, selected implementation and completed audit, but differ on the extra choice norm. -/ +def PolicyIndependenceExample : Prop := + statusPriorityPolicy.selected = outputPriorityPolicy.selected ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment = outputPriorityPolicy.assessment ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.premises = statusFacts ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.question = priorityClaim ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.report = false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.premises selected) ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.priorityReasons ≠ outputPriorityPolicy.priorityReasons ∧ + GeneralAssessmentFulfilled statusPriorityPolicy ∧ GeneralAssessmentFulfilled outputPriorityPolicy ∧ + ¬ AdditionalChoiceNorm statusPriorityPolicy ∧ AdditionalChoiceNorm outputPriorityPolicy +/- Changing the actual priority reasons changes choice compliance while the accurate audit remains identical. -/ +theorem policyIndependenceExample : PolicyIndependenceExample := by + have articulated : Articulated priorityArticulation := + ⟨by simp [priorityArticulation], by simp [priorityArticulation]⟩ + refine ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,statusFactsModel,?_, + ⟨articulated,rfl,statusPriorityAuditAccurate⟩, + ⟨articulated,rfl,statusPriorityAuditAccurate⟩,?_,?_⟩ + · decide + · exact statusOnlyFails identityRequirements identityImpl .standing + · exact identityJustified + +/- A correctly articulated, completed negative assessment does not enforce the additional selection rule. +This is only independence from represented assessment procedures: keeping this unsupported priority would fail general support proportionality too. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem generalGroundsNotChoice : + (Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusFacts selected) ∧ + priorityClaim .identity ∧ ¬ priorityClaim .successor ∧ + ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .standing]) ∧ + PolicyIndependenceExample := + ⟨statusAssessmentNonEntailment, policyIndependenceExample⟩ + +end CoreReader.Choice +``` + + + + **L1** Import CoreReader.Evidence, making its checked declarations available to this module; this line states no new philosophical result. + + + **L3** Open namespace CoreReader.Choice so subsequent declarations receive this module-qualified name. + + + **L4** Make names from CoreReader.Logic CoreReader.Evidence available without qualification; this changes name resolution, not assumptions. + + + **L6** Declare the alternatives StatusKind. Defines three status tags; no ranking or evidential meaning is attached by the datatype alone. + + + **L7** Derive decidable equality and printable representations for these finite constructors; these are computational conveniences, not choice criteria. + + + **L9** Declare the alternatives MethodReason. Defines five method-reason tags whose actual content is supplied by MethodContent. + + + **L10** Derive decidable equality and printable representations for these finite constructors; these are computational conveniences, not choice criteria. + + + **L12** Declare the alternatives Reason. Separates tagged status reasons from tagged method reasons. + + + **L13** Derive decidable equality and printable representations for these finite constructors; these are computational conveniences, not choice criteria. + + + **L15** Document the intended scope of Implementation. The corresponding declaration concerns: Packages an implementation's metadata, behavior, cost, domain, explanation function and trace function as independently supplied fields. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L16** Declare the data interface Implementation. Packages an implementation's metadata, behavior, cost, domain, explanation function and trace function as independently supplied fields. + + + **L17** Store the implementation’s descriptive name; it does not confer priority. + + + **L18** Record whether the implementation is conventional as a Boolean status fact. + + + **L19** Record whether the implementation is established, independently of its actual behavior. + + + **L20** Store the actual natural-number input/output function. + + + **L21** Store the cost checked against an application’s budget. + + + **L22** Store the implementation’s claimed domain as a predicate on inputs. + + + **L23** Store explanatory output content to be compared with actual run results. + + + **L24** Store an input-indexed execution trace whose last element can be compared with actual output. + + + **L26** Document the intended scope of Requirements. The corresponding declaration concerns: Packages the input scope, expected output, fixed budget and valued reason kinds. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L27** Declare the data interface Requirements. Packages the input scope, expected output, fixed budget and valued reason kinds. + + + **L28** Specify which inputs the application actually requires. + + + **L29** Specify the expected output at each input. + + + **L30** Specify the application’s budget constraint. + + + **L31** Specify which method-reason categories this application values; this choice is an adopted input. + + + **L33** Document the intended scope of MethodContent. The corresponding declaration concerns: Assigns a proposition to each method tag, using these particular behavioral and cost proxies. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L34** Define MethodContent. Assigns a proposition to each method tag, using these particular behavioral and cost proxies. + + + **L35** An output reason requires this implementation’s actual output to equal the application’s expected output at every required input. + + + **L36** An explanation reason requires explanatory output to match this very implementation’s actual run at every required input. + + + **L37** An applicability reason requires every application-required input to belong to this implementation’s domain. + + + **L38** The simplicity reason is the selected application’s actual cost-within-budget condition. + + + **L39** A procedure reason requires the actual trace’s last element to equal this implementation’s real output at every required input. + + + **L41** Document the intended scope of Relevant. The corresponding declaration concerns: A reason is relevant when it is an allowed method kind whose content holds; status kinds are excluded outright. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L42** Define Relevant. A reason is relevant when it is an allowed method kind whose content holds; status kinds are excluded outright. + + + **L43** Status reasons are defined as irrelevant under this adopted choice norm, regardless of their status subtype. + + + **L44** A method reason must both belong to a category valued by these requirements and satisfy that category’s actual MethodContent. + + + **L46** Define Feasible. Feasibility requires universal requested-input output correctness and fixed cost within budget; it does not include explanation, domain or trace checks. + + + **L47** Feasibility requires correct actual output at every required input and actual cost within this application’s budget. + + + **L49** Document the intended scope of JustifiedChoice. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires both output/budget feasibility and at least one listed valued method reason with its concrete content satisfied. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L50** Define JustifiedChoice. Requires both output/budget feasibility and at least one listed valued method reason with its concrete content satisfied. + + + **L51** Require feasibility and at least one actually listed relevant reason; a relevant reason alone does not establish feasibility. + + + **L53** Document the intended scope of statusOnlyFails. The corresponding declaration concerns: For any requirements and implementation, a singleton status reason cannot justify choice because its relevance is defined as false. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L54** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L55** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L56** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L57** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L58** State the checked result statusOnlyFails. For any requirements and implementation, a singleton status reason cannot justify choice because its relevance is defined as false. + + + **L59** Deny justified selection when the only listed reason is status, for the supplied arbitrary requirements and implementation. + + + **L60** Unpack an alleged status-only justified choice, extracting its listed reason and proof of relevance; feasibility alone cannot supply the missing relevance. + + + **L61** Simplify singleton membership to show that the extracted reason is exactly the given status reason. + + + **L62** Substitute the identified status reason into its alleged relevance proof. + + + **L63** Relevance of a status reason is defined as False, so the extracted hv is already a contradiction. + + + **L65** Define identityImpl. Builds an identity implementation with both status flags true, cost one, unrestricted domain, matching explanation and singleton output trace. + + + **L66** Name the concrete existing identity implementation without using its name as a proof of quality. + + + **L67** Mark the identity implementation’s conventional and established status as true; these facts remain distinct from its actual method reasons. + + + **L68** Mark the identity implementation’s conventional and established status as true; these facts remain distinct from its actual method reasons. + + + **L69** Define actual identity output as the unchanged input n. + + + **L70** Set identity’s actual cost to 1. + + + **L71** Let identity’s applicability domain contain all natural inputs. + + + **L72** Provide an explanatory result equal to the input, matching identity’s actual output. + + + **L73** Use the singleton input as the actual trace, whose last element equals identity’s output. + + + **L75** Define successorImpl. Builds a successor implementation with false status flags, cost two, unrestricted domain, matching explanation and a two-entry trace. + + + **L76** Name the alternative successor implementation. + + + **L77** Mark successor as neither conventional nor established in this example; this status alone does not determine feasibility. + + + **L78** Mark successor as neither conventional nor established in this example; this status alone does not determine feasibility. + + + **L79** Define successor’s actual output as n+1. + + + **L80** Set its original cost to 2, above the identity application’s budget 1. + + + **L81** Let successor’s applicability domain also include every natural input. + + + **L82** Provide its explanatory result n+1, faithful to its own actual output. + + + **L83** Record input and then actual successor output in its trace. + + + **L85** Define changedOutsideZero. Copies identity metadata/fields except the explicitly replaced ones, producing an implementation equal at zero but different elsewhere. + + + **L86** Start from identityImpl’s fields and explicitly override the following components. + + + **L87** Name the modified implementation by its change outside input zero. + + + **L88** Change this modified implementation’s conventional/established flags to false. + + + **L89** Change this modified implementation’s conventional/established flags to false. + + + **L90** Keep output 0 at input 0 but return n+1 at every other input. + + + **L91** Make its explanation follow the same actual piecewise output function. + + + **L92** Use that same piecewise result as its singleton trace; finish the implementation override. + + + **L94** Define identityRequirements. Requires identity behavior at all natural inputs, budget one, and values every method-reason kind. + + + **L95** Require every natural-number input in the identity application. + + + **L96** Set the desired output to the unchanged input. + + + **L97** Adopt budget 1 for the application. + + + **L98** Admit all represented method-reason categories; their actual content must still be checked. + + + **L100** Define objectiveReason. Defines a reason list containing only the output-correctness method tag. + + + **L102** State the checked result identityOutputReason. Proves the identity implementation has a relevant output reason under universal identity requirements by definitional output equality. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L103** The output reason is admitted by these requirements, and identityImpl’s actual output equals the expected output at every allowed input by reflexivity. + + + **L105** State the checked result identityFeasible. Proves universal identity output and cost one within budget one. The supplied proof term uses the displayed constructed witnesses or earlier lemmas, rather than adding an axiom. + + + **L106** For identity, every required output is correct by reflexivity; compute cost 1 within budget 1. + + + **L108** State the checked result identityJustified. Uses the output reason as the existential witness justifying identity under the given requirements. The supplied proof term uses the displayed constructed witnesses or earlier lemmas, rather than adding an axiom. + + + **L109** Combine identity’s feasibility with the actual output reason, prove it belongs to objectiveReason and supply its content-based relevance. + + + **L111** Document the intended scope of conventionWithReason. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows conventional and established metadata can coexist with justified choice when the list also contains a valid output reason; status does not provide the witness. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L112** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L113** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L114** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L115** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L116** State the checked result conventionWithReason. Shows conventional and established metadata can coexist with justified choice when the list also contains a valid output reason; status does not provide the witness. + + + **L117** Keep both actual status facts true for identity. + + + **L118** Claim justified selection using a list containing convention and an actual output reason; the output reason supplies relevance. + + + **L119** Compute the conventional/established status facts, retain actual feasibility, and select the listed output reason with its separately proved relevance. + + + **L121** Declare the alternatives Candidate. Closes the candidate universe to exactly identity and successor. + + + **L122** Derive decidable equality and printable representations for these finite constructors; these are computational conveniences, not choice criteria. + + + **L124** Define implementation. Maps each of the two candidate constructors to its concrete implementation. + + + **L125** Interpret the identity candidate as the actual identityImpl object. + + + **L126** Interpret the successor candidate as the actual successorImpl object. + + + **L128** Document the intended scope of singleFeasible. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves identity is the sole feasible member of the two-constructor candidate type under identity requirements, and separately supplies its output justification. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L129** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L130** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L131** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L132** State the checked result singleFeasible. Proves identity is the sole feasible member of the two-constructor candidate type under identity requirements, and separately supplies its output justification. + + + **L133** Over the explicitly two-valued candidate type, require feasibility exactly for identity. + + + **L134** Also retain identity’s actual output-reason justification. + + + **L135** Separate the exact feasible-candidate characterization from the existing proof of identity’s justified selection. + + + **L136** Fix any candidate in the explicit identity/successor type before checking its feasibility equivalence. + + + **L137** Exhaust the actual two-candidate type: identity or successor; no unlisted implementation is considered. + + + **L138** For identity, unfold actual outputs and cost; the identity-output and budget conditions are satisfied. + + + **L139** For successor, unfold the same requirements; the candidate cannot meet identity outputs and its original cost also exceeds the budget. + + + **L140** Reuse identityJustified to finish the concrete selected-candidate obligation. + + + **L142** Document the intended scope of localNotGlobal. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows identity and the piecewise implementation agree when input is zero but disagree at input one; this refutes inference from local agreement to global equality. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L143** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L144** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L145** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L146** State the checked result localNotGlobal. Shows identity and the piecewise implementation agree when input is zero but disagree at input one; this refutes inference from local agreement to global equality. + + + **L147** Compare actual outputs only under the input-0 scope. + + + **L148** Separately require a real output difference at input 1. + + + **L149** Separate equality under the input-0 scope from actual inequality at input 1. + + + **L150** Substitute the local-scope assumption x=0; the two implementations then have definitionally equal outputs. + + + **L151** Compute their actual outputs at input 1 to verify the claimed inequality. + + + **L153** Document the intended scope of cheapSuccessor. The corresponding declaration concerns: Lowers successor's fixed cost to one without fixing its identity-output failure. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L154** Define cheapSuccessor. Lowers successor's fixed cost to one without fixing its identity-output failure. + + + **L156** State the checked result eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient. Shows cost simplicity is relevant for cheap successor, yet output infeasibility prevents justified choice. + + + **L157** Require that cheapSuccessor’s cost reason is actually relevant under the chosen requirements. + + + **L158** Nevertheless reject its justified choice with that reason alone because feasibility includes correct outputs. + + + **L159** Show the cheap successor has an admitted cost reason with cost 1 ≤ budget 1, then separately refute justified choice. + + + **L160** Assume cheapSuccessor is justified using its cost reason, in order to extract and refute its required output feasibility. + + + **L161** An alleged justified choice includes feasible outputs; apply that requirement at input 0, where successor returns 1 instead of expected 0. + + + **L162** Eliminate the resulting impossible output equality; a relevant cost reason did not repair the wrong output. + + + **L164** Document the intended scope of internalReasons. The corresponding declaration concerns: Provides four valid internal reasons for identity and a cost-relevant successor counterexample to automatic sufficiency. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L165** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L166** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L167** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L168** State the checked result internalReasons. Provides four valid internal reasons for identity and a cost-relevant successor counterexample to automatic sufficiency. + + + **L169** Require a faithful explanation reason for the same actual identity implementation. + + + **L170** Require its actual applicability to cover the required inputs. + + + **L171** Require its actual cost to meet the valued simplicity/budget condition. + + + **L172** Require its actual trace content to meet the valued procedure condition. + + + **L173** Include a separate cheap-successor case where its cost reason is eligible. + + + **L174** That cheap candidate still fails justified selection; the combined theorem begins its proof here. + + + **L175** Provide admitted, actually faithful explanation and applicability reasons for identity, checking their content at every required input. + + + **L176** Provide the actual budget and trace reasons, then include the cheap-but-wrong example showing relevance alone is insufficient. + + + **L178** Document the intended scope of openNotEquivalent. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines identity's justification with differing identity/successor outputs at zero. It proves behavioral distinction between these examples, not a general openness property. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L179** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L180** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L181** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L182** State the checked result openNotEquivalent. Combines identity's justification with differing identity/successor outputs at zero. It proves behavioral distinction between these examples, not a general openness property. + + + **L183** Retain justified selection of the existing identity implementation based on its actual output reason. + + + **L184** Also require that identity and successor actually produce different outputs at input 0. + + + **L185** Retain the existing identity justification and compute the distinct actual outputs of identity and successor at 0. + + + **L187** Document the intended scope of priorityClaim. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines the priority claim as selection of the identity constructor. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L188** Define priorityClaim. Defines the priority claim as selection of the identity constructor. + + + **L190** Define statusFacts. Forms a theory containing two status facts about identity that are constant across candidate worlds. + + + **L191** The first status premise records actual conventional status of identity, regardless of the candidate interpretation. + + + **L192** The second status premise records actual established status of that same implementation. + + + **L194** Document the intended scope of statusFactsModel. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves every candidate world models these status facts because both concern fixed metadata, independent of selection. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L195** State the checked result statusFactsModel. Proves every candidate world models these status facts because both concern fixed metadata, independent of selection. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L196** Both status predicates concern the same actual identity implementation and are true independently of which candidate interpretation is selected; combine their singleton models. + + + **L198** Define priorityArticulation. Constructs a nonempty articulation of the constant status theory, with the same two status predicates as reasons and unrestricted limits. + + + **L199** Articulate priority and actual status concepts using statusFacts as the premise theory. + + + **L200** List the same actual conventional and established facts as articulated reasons. + + + **L201** Use unrestricted candidate scope for this status-priority articulation. + + + **L203** Document the intended scope of AssessmentAccurate. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines report accuracy as equivalence between report=true and semantic entailment of the priority claim by status facts. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L204** Define AssessmentAccurate. Defines report accuracy as equivalence between report=true and semantic entailment of the priority claim by status facts. + + + **L205** Define report accuracy by equivalence between report=true and semantic entailment of this exact priority question from these status facts. + + + **L207** State the checked result statusDoesNotEntailPriority. Refutes priority entailment using successor, which models all fixed identity-status facts but is not identity. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L208** Assume the actual status facts entail identity priority across all candidate interpretations. + + + **L209** Apply alleged status-to-priority entailment to successor, which satisfies all the same true status facts but is not identity. + + + **L210** Distinct candidate constructors refute the priority equality derived at successor. + + + **L212** State the checked result statusAssessmentNonEntailment. Retains the original factual countermodel: status facts are articulated and accurately assessed but do not entail identity priority. + + + **L213** Require procedural articulation and a correctly negative report for the same status-priority assessment. + + + **L214** Keep all candidate interpretations as models of the same actual status facts. + + + **L215** The priority predicate holds at identity and fails at successor. + + + **L216** Deny entailment of that priority predicate from status facts alone. + + + **L217** Also reject selecting identity with standing as the only actual reason. + + + **L218** Check that priorityArticulation has nonempty concepts and actual status reasons. + + + **L219** Prove report=false is accurate: it cannot equal true, and any entailment assumption contradicts the actual successor countermodel. + + + **L220** Retain models of the same facts for both candidates, priority at identity but not successor, and the established failed entailment. + + + **L221** Reuse the general status-only failure theorem for the explicit identity choice with standing as its sole reason. + + + **L223** Document the intended scope of PriorityAssessment. The corresponding declaration concerns: Stores the actual premise theory, question and Boolean assessment report independently of a choice policy. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L224** Declare the data interface PriorityAssessment. Stores the actual premise theory, question and Boolean assessment report independently of a choice policy. + + + **L225** Store the actual premise theory audited by this assessment. + + + **L226** Store the exact priority claim whose entailment is assessed. + + + **L227** Store the reported Boolean answer separately from facts and question. + + + **L228** Document the intended scope of PriorityAssessment.accurate. The corresponding declaration concerns: Matches the report to semantic entailment for this exact premise/question pair. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L229** Define PriorityAssessment.accurate. Matches the report to semantic entailment for this exact premise/question pair. + + + **L230** Require this assessment’s actual report to agree exactly with entailment from its own premises to its own question. + + + **L231** Document the intended scope of statusPriorityAudit. The corresponding declaration concerns: Records a false entailment report for the actual fixed status facts and priority question. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L232** Define statusPriorityAudit. Records a false entailment report for the actual fixed status facts and priority question. + + + **L233** Document the intended scope of ChoicePolicy. The corresponding declaration concerns: Separates chosen candidate, priority reasons and the independently stored assessment. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L234** Declare the data interface ChoicePolicy. Separates chosen candidate, priority reasons and the independently stored assessment. + + + **L235** Store the candidate this policy actually selects. + + + **L236** Store the policy’s actual priority reasons independently of its assessment record. + + + **L237** Store the actual assessment whose procedure the policy completed. + + + **L238** Document the intended scope of GeneralAssessmentFulfilled. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires nonempty actual articulation and the exact accurate status audit, without imposing the additional choice criterion. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L239** Define GeneralAssessmentFulfilled. Requires nonempty actual articulation and the exact accurate status audit, without imposing the additional choice criterion. + + + **L240** Require nonempty articulation, exactly the shared statusPriorityAudit, and its accuracy; this is specified procedure fulfillment, not full philosophical Grounds. + + + **L241** Document the intended scope of AdditionalChoiceNorm. The corresponding declaration concerns: Applies the separate feasibility-and-relevance choice norm to this policy's selected implementation and reasons. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L242** Define AdditionalChoiceNorm. Applies the separate feasibility-and-relevance choice norm to this policy's selected implementation and reasons. + + + **L243** Separately apply JustifiedChoice to the policy’s actual selected implementation and its actual reason list. + + + **L244** Document the intended scope of statusPriorityPolicy. The corresponding declaration concerns: Selects identity solely on standing while retaining the accurate non-entailment audit. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L245** Define statusPriorityPolicy. Selects identity solely on standing while retaining the accurate non-entailment audit. + + + **L246** Document the intended scope of outputPriorityPolicy. The corresponding declaration concerns: Keeps the same choice and audit but uses the actual output reason. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L247** Define outputPriorityPolicy. Keeps the same choice and audit but uses the actual output reason. + + + **L248** Document the intended scope of statusPriorityAuditAccurate. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses the successor countermodel to establish the recorded false entailment report is accurate. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L249** State the checked result statusPriorityAuditAccurate. Uses the successor countermodel to establish the recorded false entailment report is accurate. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L250** Split accuracy of the negative audit into the two directions of its equivalence with entailment. + + + **L251** The audit’s actual false report cannot equal true, so this direction has an impossible premise. + + + **L252** Any asserted entailment contradicts statusDoesNotEntailPriority; this establishes the reverse accuracy direction for the false report. + + + **L253** Document the intended scope of PolicyIndependenceExample. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires two policies with the same actual selection/audit but different reasons, both satisfying represented assessment duties and only the output policy satisfying the extra norm. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L254** Define PolicyIndependenceExample. Requires two policies with the same actual selection/audit but different reasons, both satisfying represented assessment duties and only the output policy satisfying the extra norm. + + + **L255** Fix identical selected candidates in both policies. + + + **L256** Fix the same actual assessment in both policies. + + + **L257** Bind that assessment’s premises to the actual shared statusFacts. + + + **L258** Bind its question to the same priorityClaim. + + + **L259** Fix the common report to false, rather than allowing policy changes to alter the audit answer. + + + **L260** Retain models of these same assessment premises for every candidate interpretation. + + + **L261** Require the actual priority reason lists to differ despite the shared candidate and audit. + + + **L262** Require both policies to complete the same specified assessment procedure accurately. + + + **L263** Require opposite results under the additional choice norm: status fails, output passes. + + + **L264** Document the intended scope of policyIndependenceExample. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs both independent policy objects and combines actual audit accuracy with status rejection and output justification. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L265** State the checked result policyIndependenceExample. Constructs both independent policy objects and combines actual audit accuracy with status rejection and output justification. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L266** Construct one shared nonempty articulation of the actual status-priority question for both policies. + + + **L267** Construct one shared nonempty articulation of the actual status-priority question for both policies. + + + **L268** Fix identical selected candidate, audit, premises, question and false report; retain actual fact models and leave the difference in reason lists. + + + **L269** Show the status-only policy completed that exact articulated audit with its mathematically accurate report. + + + **L270** Supply the identical fulfilled audit for the output policy, leaving the two separate additional-choice-norm results. + + + **L271** Compute that status-only and output-based priority reason lists are distinct despite their shared selected candidate and audit. + + + **L272** Apply statusOnlyFails to the actual status policy’s priority reason, proving failure of AdditionalChoiceNorm. + + + **L273** Use identityJustified for the output policy’s actual relevant output reason, proving its AdditionalChoiceNorm. + + + **L275** Document the intended scope of generalGroundsNotChoice. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines the factual non-entailment case with a separate policy-level countermodel to deriving the added choice norm from represented general assessment duties. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L276** Document the intended scope of generalGroundsNotChoice. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines the factual non-entailment case with a separate policy-level countermodel to deriving the added choice norm from represented general assessment duties. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L277** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L278** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L279** Register source unit organon.grounds.implementations#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L280** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L281** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L282** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L283** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L284** State the checked result generalGroundsNotChoice. Combines the factual non-entailment case with a separate policy-level countermodel to deriving the added choice norm from represented general assessment duties. + + + **L285** Retain the original articulated, accurately negative status assessment as part of the registered result. + + + **L286** Keep the same actual status premises modeled by every candidate. + + + **L287** Keep priority true for identity and false for successor. + + + **L288** Keep the demonstrated status-to-priority non-entailment. + + + **L289** Keep status-only choice failure, then join it to the stronger policy-independence example. + + + **L290** Include actual policy variation through PolicyIndependenceExample, rather than ending at status non-entailment. + + + **L291** Pair the preserved status non-entailment proof with policyIndependenceExample, thereby including actual independent priority-reason variation in the registered theorem. + + + **L293** Close namespace CoreReader.Choice; this adds no proof or premise. + + +### `leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean` + + +```lean +import CoreReader.Logic +import CoreReader.Agency + +namespace CoreReader.Evidence +open CoreReader.Logic +open CoreReader.Agency + +/- An observation records the outcome of a specified test on the represented world. -/ +structure Record (W : Type) where + test : W → Bool + observed : Bool +/- Compatible worlds reproduce the actual contents of every recorded observation. -/ +def Compatible {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (w : W) : Prop := + ∀ r, r ∈ records → r.test w = r.observed +/- Inferential support requires the same claim in every evidence-compatible world. -/ +def Supports {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (claim : Claim W) : Prop := + ∀ w, Compatible records w → claim w +/- Articulation identifies concepts, premises, reason contents and an application limit. -/ +structure Articulation (W : Type) where + concepts : List String + assumptions : Theory W + reasons : List (Claim W) + limits : Claim W +/- Nonempty identifiable concepts and reasons are procedural articulation requirements. -/ +def Articulated {W : Type} (a : Articulation W) : Prop := + a.concepts ≠ [] ∧ a.reasons ≠ [] +/- This application model interprets an adopted option through its actual outcomes and stated goals/constraints. -/ +structure ValuePosition (W : Type) where + Position : Type + Outcome : Type + adopted : Position + selected : W → Position + outcome : W → Position → Outcome + objective : Outcome → Prop + constraints : W → Position → Prop + starting : Theory W + reasons : List (W → Position → Prop) + limits : Claim W + relevantCriticism : Claim W + response : W → Option String +/- The adopted position's claim is derived from the same selected option used by the outcome interpretation. -/ +def ValuePosition.commitment {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Claim W := + fun w => v.selected w = v.adopted +/- Assessed consequences concern this adopted option's actual outcome, objective and constraints. -/ +def ValuePosition.consequence {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Claim W := + fun w => v.objective (v.outcome w v.adopted) ∧ v.constraints w v.adopted +/- Articulated reasons specialize the actual option-indexed premises to the adopted option. -/ +def ValuePosition.activeReasons {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : List (Claim W) := + v.reasons.map (fun reason w => reason w v.adopted) +/- A joint witness excludes inconsistent starts and impossible adoption states. -/ +def JointAdoption {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Prop := + ∃ w, Models v.starting w ∧ v.limits w ∧ v.commitment w ∧ + ∀ reason, reason ∈ v.reasons → reason w v.adopted +/- This declared option/outcome adapter checks joint reasons for an assessed consequence; it is not a necessary deductive form for all value justification. -/ +def ValueProcedure {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Prop := + v.reasons ≠ [] ∧ JointAdoption v ∧ + (∀ w, Models v.starting w → v.limits w → + (∀ reason, reason ∈ v.reasons → reason w v.adopted) → v.consequence w) ∧ + (∀ w, v.limits w → v.relevantCriticism w → ∃ answer, v.response w = some answer ∧ answer ≠ "") +/- A facet carries its specific contents; several different facets can have the same conclusion. -/ +inductive Facet (W : Type) where + | empirical (records : List (Record W)) (scope conclusion uncertainty : Claim W) + | inferential (assumptions : Theory W) (conclusion : Claim W) + | value (position : ValuePosition W) +/- The claim referred to by each assessment facet is explicit. -/ +def Facet.claim {W : Type} : Facet W → Claim W + | .empirical _ _ p _ => p + | .inferential _ p => p + | .value v => v.commitment +/- These disclosed semantic adapters implement selected nature-specific checks; passing them does not establish all real empirical or value adequacy. -/ +def FacetDischarged {W : Type} : Facet W → Prop + | .empirical records scope p uncertainty => + (∃ w, Compatible records w ∧ scope w) ∧ + Supports records (fun w => scope w → p w) ∧ Supports records uncertainty + | .inferential assumptions p => Satisfiable assumptions ∧ Entails assumptions p + | .value v => ValueProcedure v +/- This model's semantic adapter identifies the actual assumptions, reason content and limit of a facet. -/ +def FacetArticulated {W : Type} (a : Articulation W) : Facet W → Prop + | .empirical records scope _ _ => + a.assumptions = singleton (Compatible records) ∧ a.reasons = [Compatible records] ∧ a.limits = scope + | .inferential assumptions _ => + a.assumptions = assumptions ∧ a.reasons = [Models assumptions] ∧ a.limits = (fun _ => True) + | .value v => a.assumptions = v.starting ∧ a.reasons = v.activeReasons ∧ a.limits = v.limits +/- A canonical articulation exposes this adapter; the source does not mandate this particular representation of grounds. -/ +def canonicalArticulation {W : Type} : Facet W → Articulation W + | .empirical records scope _ _ => + ⟨["recorded test outcomes", "observation conditions"], singleton (Compatible records), [Compatible records], scope⟩ + | .inferential assumptions _ => + ⟨["stated assumptions", "semantic consequence"], assumptions, [Models assumptions], fun _ => True⟩ + | .value v => + ⟨["adopted position", "reasons and consequences"], v.starting, v.activeReasons, v.limits⟩ +/- Canonical articulation is connected to the very facet whose grounds it identifies. -/ +theorem canonicalFacetArticulated {W : Type} (f : Facet W) : + FacetArticulated (canonicalArticulation f) f := by + cases f <;> exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ +/- A discharged facet has nonempty canonical reason articulation, including the value procedure's reason requirement. -/ +theorem canonicalArticulated {W : Type} (f : Facet W) (h : FacetDischarged f) : + Articulated (canonicalArticulation f) := by + cases f with + | empirical records scope p uncertainty => simp [Articulated, canonicalArticulation] + | inferential assumptions p => simp [Articulated, canonicalArticulation] + | value v => + refine ⟨by simp [canonicalArticulation], ?_⟩ + simpa [canonicalArticulation, ValuePosition.activeReasons] using h.1 +/- This model of the Grounds obligation binds each actual facet to its claim and articulation. Its disclosed FacetDischarged adapters do not replace all source-level assessment responsibilities or prove real adequacy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Grounds {W : Type} (claim : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := + facets ≠ [] ∧ (∀ facet, actualApplicable facet → facet ∈ facets) ∧ + ∀ facet, facet ∈ facets → facet.claim = claim ∧ Articulated (articulations facet) ∧ + FacetArticulated (articulations facet) facet ∧ FacetDischarged facet +/- The achievement obligation requires grounds for this very claim, without making observation a universal prerequisite. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +def AchievementAccountability {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := + Grounds achievement articulations actualApplicable facets +/- The concrete achievement claim refers to each transition's own before/after states. -/ +def transitionAchievement : Claim TransitionCase := + fun transition => Expanded (transitionBefore transition) (transitionAfter transition) +/- This observation inspects an actually constructed successor and its output under that transition's input condition. -/ +def transitionPerformanceRecord : Record TransitionCase := + ⟨fun transition => (transitionAfter transition).constructed.any + (fun operation => operation == .successor && decide (operation.run (transitionInput transition) = 1)), true⟩ +/- The positive report test reads its asserted operation, input and output; it does not verify their presence in the after-state. -/ +def transitionReportRecord : Record TransitionCase := + ⟨fun transition => + let report := transitionAnnouncement transition + report.reportedNewOperation == .successor && report.input == 0 && report.expectedOutput == 1, true⟩ +/- Only the genuine extension matches the operation/performance observation in this two-transition model. -/ +theorem transitionPerformanceCompatible : + ∀ transition, Compatible [transitionPerformanceRecord] transition ↔ transition = .extend := by + intro transition + constructor + · intro h + have observed := h transitionPerformanceRecord (List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl) + cases transition + · cases observed + · rfl + · intro h; cases h + intro record hr; have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr; subst record + rfl +/- A compatible performance observation establishes the same transition's report content and hence its represented expansion. -/ +theorem transitionSupported : Supports [transitionPerformanceRecord] transitionAchievement := by + intro transition compatible + have h := (transitionPerformanceCompatible transition).1 compatible + subst transition + have reportTrue : (transitionAnnouncement .extend).claim := by + simp [transitionAnnouncement, transitionAfter, transitionInput, + Announcement.claim, GeneratingSystem.report, generatingSystem, extendedState, baseState, Operation.run] + exact announcementClaimImpliesExpansion _ reportTrue +/- The actual scope is the shared input-zero condition, with no probabilistic inference introduced. -/ +def transitionFacet : Facet TransitionCase := + .empirical [transitionPerformanceRecord] (fun transition => transitionInput transition = 0) + transitionAchievement (fun _ => True) +/- The empirical assessment has a real compatible witness and supports this scoped achievement. -/ +theorem transitionFacetDischarged : FacetDischarged transitionFacet := by + refine ⟨⟨.extend, (transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro transition compatible _; exact transitionSupported transition compatible + · intro _ _; trivial +/- Every applicable facet of this specified achievement has matching articulation and actual discharged evidence. -/ +theorem transitionAccountable : + AchievementAccountability transitionAchievement canonicalArticulation + (fun facet => facet = transitionFacet) [transitionFacet] := by + refine ⟨by simp, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro facet hf; subst facet; exact List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl + · intro facet hf; have hf' := List.mem_singleton.mp hf; subst facet + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated _ transitionFacetDischarged, + canonicalFacetArticulated _, transitionFacetDischarged⟩ +/- Both actual transitions issue the same positive report about their own identified state pair. -/ +theorem transitionReportCompatible (transition : TransitionCase) : + Compatible [transitionReportRecord] transition := by + intro record hr; have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr; subst record + rfl +/- Inflation is a concrete report-compatible counterworld, so the positive report alone does not support the same achievement claim. -/ +theorem transitionReportDoesNotSupport : + Compatible [transitionReportRecord] .inflate ∧ ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate ∧ + ¬ Supports [transitionReportRecord] transitionAchievement := by + have noExpansion : ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate := by + simp [transitionAchievement, transitionBefore, transitionAfter, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + exact ⟨transitionReportCompatible _, noExpansion, fun h => noExpansion (h _ (transitionReportCompatible _))⟩ +/- These concrete obligations, positive evidence and negative report case all refer to the same state-pair and input semantics. -/ +def ConcreteAchievementExample : Prop := + AchievementAccountability transitionAchievement canonicalArticulation + (fun facet => facet = transitionFacet) [transitionFacet] ∧ + Compatible [transitionPerformanceRecord] .extend ∧ + Supports [transitionPerformanceRecord] transitionAchievement ∧ transitionAchievement .extend ∧ + (Compatible [transitionReportRecord] .inflate ∧ ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate ∧ + ¬ Supports [transitionReportRecord] transitionAchievement) ∧ + (∀ transition, (transitionAnnouncement transition).before = transitionBefore transition ∧ + (transitionAnnouncement transition).after = transitionAfter transition ∧ + (transitionAnnouncement transition).input = transitionInput transition ∧ transitionInput transition = 0) +/- The concrete example jointly inhabits accountability, evidence compatibility, actual gain, and the report-only countermodel. -/ +theorem concreteAchievementExample : ConcreteAchievementExample := by + refine ⟨transitionAccountable, (transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl, transitionSupported, + transitionSupported .extend ((transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl), + transitionReportDoesNotSupport, ?_⟩ + intro transition; exact ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl⟩ +/- Semantic evidence yields truth only at a world that actually satisfies those evidence conditions. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem achievementNeedsSupport {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (records : List (Record W)) + (actual : W) (reliableHere : Compatible records actual) (support : Supports records achievement) : + achievement actual ∧ ConcreteAchievementExample := + ⟨support actual reliableHere, concreteAchievementExample⟩ +/- Weakening a conclusion preserves support; this makes no claim about weakening the evidence. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem supportWeakening {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p q : Claim W) + (support : Supports records p) (weaker : ∀ w, p w → q w) : Supports records q := + fun w hw => weaker w (support w hw) +/- Discarding the only informative observation loses support for the unchanged switch claim. -/ +theorem evidenceWeakeningCanLoseSupport : + Supports ([⟨id, true⟩] : List (Record Bool)) (fun w => w = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports ([] : List (Record Bool)) (fun w => w = true) := by + refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w hw; exact hw ⟨id,true⟩ (by simp) + · intro h; have bad := h false (by intro r hr; cases hr); cases bad +/- Restricting the quantified application domain preserves a supported universal conclusion. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem scopeRestriction {W X : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p : W → X → Prop) + (wide narrow : X → Prop) (included : ∀ x, narrow x → wide x) + (support : Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, wide x → p w x)) : + Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, narrow x → p w x) := + fun w hw x hx => support w hw x (included x hx) +/- Actual applicability, rather than an optional classifier label, determines facet responsibility. -/ +def Duties {W : Type} (applicable : Facet W → Prop) : Prop := + ∀ f, applicable f → FacetDischarged f +def LabeledDuties {W : Type} (_labels : List String) (applicable : Facet W → Prop) : Prop := + Duties applicable +/- Combining applicable facets requires both sets of substantive duties. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem assessmentUnion {W : Type} (a b : Facet W → Prop) : + Duties (fun f => a f ∨ b f) ↔ Duties a ∧ Duties b := by + constructor + · intro h; exact ⟨fun f hf => h f (Or.inl hf), fun f hf => h f (Or.inr hf)⟩ + · rintro ⟨ha,hb⟩ f (hf|hf); exact ha f hf; exact hb f hf +/- Omitting or changing labels does not remove an applicable duty. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem labelsCannotWaive {W : Type} (xs ys : List String) (a : Facet W → Prop) : + LabeledDuties xs a ↔ LabeledDuties ys a := Iff.rfl +/- The observed switch is the outcome itself, not a record identifier. -/ +def switchRecord : Record Bool := ⟨id, true⟩ +theorem switchCompatible (w : Bool) : Compatible [switchRecord] w ↔ w = true := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h switchRecord (by simp) + · intro hw r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; exact hw +theorem switchSupported : Supports [switchRecord] (fun w : Bool => w = true) := + fun w hw => (switchCompatible w).1 hw +/- The candidate action has specific benefit and cost outcomes; its inactive alternative has neither. -/ +def optionBenefit (selected : Bool) : Nat := if selected then 4 else 0 +def optionCost (selected : Bool) : Nat := if selected then 3 else 0 +/- The report describes each option's actual cost and benefit; it does not itself assert which option ought to be selected. -/ +def optionReport (selected : Bool) : Prop := + optionCost selected ≤ 3 ∧ optionBenefit selected = (if selected then 4 else 0) +/- The on position connects its own selected option to that option's benefit/cost outcome. -/ +def switchPosition : ValuePosition Bool where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := id + outcome := fun _ option => (optionBenefit option, optionCost option) + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun _ option => optionCost option ≤ 3 + starting := singleton (fun w => w = true) + reasons := [fun _ option => optionReport option] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun w => w = false + response := fun w => if w then some "benefit exceeds cost within budget" else some "reconsider if the budget no longer permits this cost" +theorem switchValueProcedure : ValueProcedure switchPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [switchPosition], ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · refine ⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + · intro w _ _ allReasons + have evidence := allReasons (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) (List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl) + change optionReport true at evidence + have benefitAboveBudget : 3 < optionBenefit true := by rw [evidence.2]; decide + exact ⟨Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt evidence.1 benefitAboveBudget, evidence.1⟩ + · intro w _ _; cases w <;> simp [switchPosition] +/- Adopting the other option updates the adopted starting state too, so rejection cannot be blamed on an inconsistent start. -/ +def oppositePosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with adopted := false, starting := singleton (fun w => w = false) } +/- The alternative has a joint adoption witness but its actual zero benefit/cost fails the adopted strict-benefit objective. -/ +theorem oppositePositionRejected : JointAdoption oppositePosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure oppositePosition := by + have witness : JointAdoption oppositePosition := by + refine ⟨false, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + refine ⟨witness, ?_⟩ + intro h + have allReasons : ∀ reason, reason ∈ oppositePosition.reasons → reason false oppositePosition.adopted := by + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + have bad := h.2.2.1 false ((modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl) trivial allReasons + exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 bad.1 +/- Contradictory starting assumptions and an impossible selected/adopted equality are separate inadmissible variants. -/ +def contradictoryStartingPosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with starting := singleton (fun _ => False) } +def impossibleAdoptionPosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with selected := fun _ => false } +/- The common-world witness rejects both contradiction and an impossible commitment instead of proving them vacuously. -/ +theorem inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected : + ¬ ValueProcedure contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure impossibleAdoptionPosition := by + constructor + · intro h; obtain ⟨w,hw,_,_,_⟩ := h.2.1 + exact (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hw + · intro h; obtain ⟨w,_,_,hw,_⟩ := h.2.1 + cases hw +/- Removing the reasons leaves only a position and assertion, which fails this value procedure. -/ +def unsupportedPosition : ValuePosition Bool := { switchPosition with reasons := [] } +def switchEmpirical : Facet Bool := + .empirical [switchRecord] (fun _ => True) (fun w => w = true) (fun _ => True) +theorem switchEmpiricalDischarged : FacetDischarged switchEmpirical := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (switchCompatible true).2 rfl, trivial⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w hw _; exact switchSupported w hw + · intro w _; trivial +/- A mixed empirical/value position has actual empirical evidence but still lacks its value-reason duty. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem mixedMissingResponsibility : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬ LabeledDuties [] (fun f : Facet Bool => f = switchEmpirical ∨ f = .value unsupportedPosition) := by + refine ⟨switchEmpiricalDischarged, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := (h (.value unsupportedPosition) (Or.inr rfl)).1 + exact bad rfl +/- A fully identified argument may still fail to entail the stated conclusion. -/ +def uninformativeArgument : Articulation Bool := + ⟨["switch state"], emptyTheory, [fun _ => True], fun _ => True⟩ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem articulationNotSupport : Articulated uninformativeArgument ∧ + ¬ Entails uninformativeArgument.assumptions (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by + exact ⟨⟨by simp [uninformativeArgument], by simp [uninformativeArgument]⟩, + consistentIncomplete.2.1⟩ +/- Identifiable but unrelated argument fields cannot replace the actual observation grounds under the connected adapter. -/ +theorem unrelatedArticulationRejected : + Articulated uninformativeArgument ∧ FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬ FacetArticulated uninformativeArgument switchEmpirical := by + refine ⟨articulationNotSupport.1, switchEmpiricalDischarged, ?_⟩ + intro h + have relation := congrFun h.1 (Compatible [switchRecord]) + have bad : False := relation.mpr rfl + exact bad +/- Repetition of the same unrelated temperature observation leaves the switch state undetermined. -/ +def temperatureRecord : Record (Bool × Bool) := ⟨Prod.fst, true⟩ +theorem temperatureCompatible (b : Bool) : + Compatible [temperatureRecord, temperatureRecord] (true,b) := by + intro r hr + simp at hr + cases hr + rfl +/- The world identifies a selected action and its budget; the action costs three units. -/ +abbrev BudgetWorld := Bool × Nat +/- A real issued announcement asserts the selected action, but says nothing about affordability. -/ +def announcement : String := "activate" +def announcementPosition : ValuePosition BudgetWorld where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := Prod.fst + outcome := fun _ option => (optionBenefit option, optionCost option) + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun w option => optionCost option ≤ w.2 + starting := singleton (fun w => w.1 = true) + reasons := [fun _ option => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun w => w.2 < 3 + response := fun _ => some "reconsider the action when its cost exceeds budget" +/- The zero-budget counterworld satisfies the stated starts, adoption and all announced reasons jointly. -/ +theorem announcementHasJointAdoption : JointAdoption announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨(true,0), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := + List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl +/- A nonempty announcement remains true in a jointly admissible zero-budget world but cannot support the action's affordability. -/ +theorem announcementNotBudgetReason : + announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ announcementPosition.commitment (true,0) ∧ + (∀ reason, reason ∈ announcementPosition.reasons → reason (true,0) announcementPosition.adopted) ∧ + ¬ announcementPosition.consequence (true,0) ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [announcementPosition], rfl, ?_, (by intro h; cases h.2), ?_⟩ + · intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl + · intro h + have allReasons : ∀ reason, reason ∈ announcementPosition.reasons → reason (true,0) announcementPosition.adopted := by + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl + have bad := h.2.2.1 (true,0) ((modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl) trivial allReasons + cases bad.2 +/- A repeated actual selection observation contains no budget information. -/ +def actionRecord : Record BudgetWorld := ⟨Prod.fst, true⟩ +theorem actionCompatible (budget : Nat) : Compatible [actionRecord, actionRecord] (true,budget) := by + intro r hr; simp at hr; cases hr; rfl +/- Single and repeated irrelevant observations cannot establish the other outcome or the same action's budget adequacy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem measurementRepeatNotSupport : + temperatureRecord.test (true,false) = true ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,false) ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,0) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,3) ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord,actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨rfl, temperatureCompatible false, temperatureCompatible true, ?_, ?_, + actionCompatible 0, actionCompatible 3, ?_, ?_, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.2⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h (true,false) (by intro r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; rfl) + cases bad + · intro h; have bad := h (true,false) (temperatureCompatible false); cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (true,0) (by intro r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; rfl) + cases bad.2 + · intro h; have bad := h (true,0) (actionCompatible 0); cases bad.2 +/- Missing reason records fail a procedure; independently, a present announcement fails the explicit budget-support criterion. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem selfAssertionNotReason : + (unsupportedPosition.commitment true ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure unsupportedPosition) ∧ + (announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ announcementPosition.commitment (true,0) ∧ + ¬ announcementPosition.consequence (true,0) ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition) ∧ + JointAdoption announcementPosition := + ⟨⟨rfl, fun h => h.1 rfl⟩, + ⟨announcementNotBudgetReason.1, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.1, + announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.1, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.2⟩, + announcementHasJointAdoption⟩ +/- The value procedure is satisfiable although the adopted starting commitment is not entailed by empty facts. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem valueWithoutSelfProof : ValueProcedure switchPosition ∧ + Satisfiable switchPosition.starting ∧ + ¬ Entails (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) switchPosition.commitment ∧ + (JointAdoption oppositePosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure oppositePosition) ∧ + (¬ ValueProcedure contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure impossibleAdoptionPosition) := + ⟨switchValueProcedure, ⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, consistentIncomplete.2.1, + oppositePositionRejected, inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected⟩ +/- The world records the selected option and its actual benefit/cost outcomes. -/ +abbrev BenefitCostWorld := Bool × (Nat × Nat) +def measuredOutcome (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Nat × Nat := + if option then world.2 else (0,0) +def benefitReason (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Prop := + (measuredOutcome world option).1 = 4 +def costReason (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Prop := + (measuredOutcome world option).2 ≤ 3 +/- Neither recorded benefit nor recorded cost alone establishes the selected option's joint consequence. -/ +def jointReasonPosition : ValuePosition BenefitCostWorld where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := Prod.fst + outcome := measuredOutcome + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun world option => (measuredOutcome world option).2 ≤ 3 + starting := singleton (fun world => world.1 = true) + reasons := [benefitReason, costReason] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun world => 3 < world.2.2 + response := fun _ => some "reassess the option when its cost exceeds the budget" +/- These two content constraints jointly establish the consequence in a nonempty adopted world. -/ +theorem jointReasonProcedure : ValueProcedure jointReasonPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [jointReasonPosition], ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · refine ⟨(true,(4,3)), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + change reason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason] at hr + rcases List.mem_cons.mp hr with hr | hr + · subst reason; rfl + · have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + change 3 ≤ 3; exact Nat.le_refl 3 + · intro world _ _ reasons + have benefit := reasons benefitReason (by change benefitReason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason]; simp) + have cost := reasons costReason (by change costReason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason]; simp) + change (measuredOutcome world true).1 = 4 at benefit + change (measuredOutcome world true).2 ≤ 3 at cost + refine ⟨?_, cost⟩ + have bigger : 3 < (measuredOutcome world true).1 := by rw [benefit]; decide + exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt cost bigger + · intro world _ _ + exact ⟨"reassess the option when its cost exceeds the budget", rfl, by decide⟩ +/- Each separate reason has a concrete same-start/limit/adoption counterworld; their conjunction is sufficient. -/ +def JointReasonsExample : Prop := + ValueProcedure jointReasonPosition ∧ + (Models jointReasonPosition.starting (true,(4,5)) ∧ jointReasonPosition.limits (true,(4,5)) ∧ + jointReasonPosition.commitment (true,(4,5)) ∧ benefitReason (true,(4,5)) true ∧ + ¬ jointReasonPosition.consequence (true,(4,5))) ∧ + (Models jointReasonPosition.starting (true,(0,3)) ∧ jointReasonPosition.limits (true,(0,3)) ∧ + jointReasonPosition.commitment (true,(0,3)) ∧ costReason (true,(0,3)) true ∧ + ¬ jointReasonPosition.consequence (true,(0,3))) +theorem jointReasonsExample : JointReasonsExample := by + refine ⟨jointReasonProcedure, + ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, rfl, ?_⟩, + ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, Nat.le_refl 3, ?_⟩⟩ + · intro h; have bad : 5 ≤ 3 := h.2; omega + · intro h; have bad : 3 < 0 := h.1; omega +/- Empirical observations, semantic inference and criticism-responsive reasons coexist without a scalar score. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem heterogeneousReasons : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.inferential (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) (fun w => w = true)) ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.value switchPosition) ∧ JointReasonsExample := by + refine ⟨switchEmpiricalDischarged, ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩, switchValueProcedure, jointReasonsExample⟩ + intro w hw; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 hw + +/- This local observation checks the actual output on input zero. -/ +def zeroRecord : Record (Nat → Bool) := ⟨fun f => f 0, true⟩ +def localGenerator (seed : Nat) : Nat → Bool := fun n => n == seed +/- All outputs being true is a stronger, explicitly quantified capability claim. -/ +def allTrue : Claim (Nat → Bool) := fun f => ∀ n, f n = true +theorem zeroCompatible (f : Nat → Bool) : Compatible [zeroRecord] f ↔ f 0 = true := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h zeroRecord (by simp) + · intro hf r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; exact hf +/- A generating subject owns an earlier predicate and a seed used to revise that actual predicate. -/ +structure GeneratingProcess where + owner : Nat + prior : Nat → Bool + generateSeed : Nat +/- The revision preserves prior successes and adds the seed-selected case through the actual generator. -/ +def GeneratingProcess.outputRevision (process : GeneratingProcess) : Nat → Bool := + fun input => process.prior input || localGenerator process.generateSeed input +/- A produced revision retains its producer and exact old/new objects. -/ +structure ProducedRevision where + producer : Nat + before : Nat → Bool + after : Nat → Bool +/- The subject itself constructs the owned before/after revision object. -/ +def GeneratingProcess.produce (process : GeneratingProcess) : ProducedRevision := + ⟨process.owner, process.prior, process.outputRevision⟩ +def sampleGeneratingProcess : GeneratingProcess := ⟨17, fun _ => false, 0⟩ +/- This same-owner revision actually changes input zero, while its produced predicate still fails at input one. -/ +def OwnedRevisionExample : Prop := + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.producer = sampleGeneratingProcess.owner ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.before = sampleGeneratingProcess.prior ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after = sampleGeneratingProcess.outputRevision ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.before 0 = false ∧ sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after 0 = true ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after 1 = false ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue +/- Actual producer/old/new links and the compatible failing revision witness the insufficiency of self-origin. -/ +theorem ownedRevisionExample : OwnedRevisionExample := by + refine ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,(zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after ((zeroCompatible _).2 rfl) 1 + cases bad +/- The generator's own sample succeeds, but its generated revision has a concrete unsupported global claim. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem selfOriginDoesNotSupport : + localGenerator 0 0 = true ∧ localGenerator 0 1 = false ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue ∧ OwnedRevisionExample := by + refine ⟨rfl, rfl, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, ?_, ownedRevisionExample⟩ + intro h + have bad := h (localGenerator 0) ((zeroCompatible _).2 rfl) 1 + cases bad +/- A proper local observation allows both a universally successful and a failing extension. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem localNotUniversal : + (∃ outside : Nat, outside ≠ 0) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (fun _ => true) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + allTrue (fun _ => true) ∧ ¬ allTrue (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := by + refine ⟨⟨1, by decide⟩, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, + (fun _ => rfl), ?_, selfOriginDoesNotSupport.2.2.2.1⟩ + intro h; have bad := h 1; cases bad +/- Two implementations agree on the actual observed input and differ on a specified relevant omitted input. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem hiddenDifference : + (∀ n : Nat, n = 0 → (fun _ : Nat => true) n = localGenerator 0 n) ∧ + (fun _ : Nat => true) 1 ≠ localGenerator 0 1 := by + refine ⟨?_, by decide⟩ + intro n hn; cases hn; rfl +/- One observation supplies only its actual input-specific consequence, without repetition. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem singleObservation : [zeroRecord].length = 1 ∧ + (∃ f, Compatible [zeroRecord] f) ∧ + Supports [zeroRecord] (fun f => f 0 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := + ⟨rfl, ⟨localGenerator 0, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl⟩, + (fun f hf => (zeroCompatible f).1 hf), selfOriginDoesNotSupport.2.2.2.1⟩ +/- This inferential assessment derives a successor value from its explicit numeric premise without observation. -/ +def arithmeticFacet : Facet Nat := .inferential (singleton (fun n => n = 2)) (fun n => n + 1 = 3) +def usesObservation {W : Type} : Facet W → Bool + | .empirical _ _ _ _ => true + | _ => false +/- An actual valid inferential assessment refutes a mandatory measurement/repetition/framework chain. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem noUniversalChain : FacetDischarged arithmeticFacet ∧ usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false := by + refine ⟨⟨⟨2, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩, rfl⟩ + intro n hn + have premise := (modelsSingleton (fun x : Nat => x = 2) n).1 hn + change n + 1 = 3 + rw [premise] +/- A trial has a reproducible setting, an actual outcome and a separately recorded outcome. -/ +structure Trial where + setting : Nat + actualOutcome : Nat + recordedOutcome : Nat +/- Verifying a record, reproducing settings and retaining a conclusion are separate predicates. -/ +def Verified (t : Trial) : Prop := t.recordedOutcome = t.actualOutcome +def Reproduced (a b : Trial) : Prop := a.setting = b.setting +def Bounded (t : Trial) : Prop := t.actualOutcome ≤ 2 +/- Same-setting possible trials can differ while preserving the chosen bound; no probability semantics is claimed. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem variableOutcomesStableBound : + let a : Trial := ⟨0,1,1⟩ + let b : Trial := ⟨0,2,2⟩ + Reproduced a b ∧ a.actualOutcome ≠ b.actualOutcome ∧ Bounded a ∧ Bounded b := by + simp [Reproduced, Bounded] +/- Concrete records distinguish record accuracy, condition reproduction and conclusion stability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem verificationReproductionStability : + (Verified ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Verified ⟨1,1,1⟩ ∧ ¬ Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨1,1,1⟩) ∧ + (Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Bounded ⟨0,3,2⟩) ∧ + (Bounded ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Bounded ⟨0,2,0⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,2,0⟩) := by + simp [Verified, Reproduced, Bounded] +/- Explanation certificates are executable syntax for this same arithmetic process. -/ +inductive Program where + | doubleInput + | constant (value : Nat) +def Program.eval : Program → Nat → Nat + | .doubleInput, n => n + n + | .constant value, _ => value +/- A process exposes outputs and an explanation response, whose certificate can be checked against those outputs. -/ +structure Process where + output : Nat → Nat + explanation : Option Program +/- The output-only application contract checks every relevant input. -/ +def OutputContract (p : Process) : Prop := ∀ n, p.output n = n + n +/- The explanation application contract requires a provided certificate faithful to this very process. -/ +def ExplanationContract (p : Process) : Prop := + ∃ program, p.explanation = some program ∧ ∀ n, program.eval n = p.output n +/- This process produces doubled values but returns no explanatory certificate. -/ +def outputOnlyProcess : Process := ⟨fun n => n + n, none⟩ +def explainedProcess : Process := ⟨fun n => n + n, some .doubleInput⟩ +/- Object scope fixes the very process whose contract is assessed; contract inputs themselves still range over all naturals. -/ +def processScope (assessed : Process) : Theory Process := + singleton (fun candidate => candidate = assessed) +/- This inferential facet checks an explicit contract under exact process-identity assumptions. -/ +def processContractFacet (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) : Facet Process := + .inferential (processScope assessed) contract +/- The scope's compatible interpretations are exactly this assessed process, not an unrelated substitute. -/ +theorem processScopeModels (assessed candidate : Process) : + Models (processScope assessed) candidate ↔ candidate = assessed := + modelsSingleton (fun process => process = assessed) candidate +/- A concrete contract proof supplies the facet's consequence for its scoped object. -/ +theorem processContractDischarged (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) (proof : contract assessed) : + FacetDischarged (processContractFacet assessed contract) := by + refine ⟨⟨assessed,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + intro candidate hc + have same := (processScopeModels _ _).1 hc + subst candidate + exact proof +/- Scoped capability grounds include exact claim, object-specific assumptions, canonical articulation and actual assessment. -/ +def ProcessGrounds (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) : Prop := + Grounds contract canonicalArticulation (fun facet => facet = processContractFacet assessed contract) + [processContractFacet assessed contract] +theorem processGrounds (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) (proof : contract assessed) : + ProcessGrounds assessed contract := by + have discharged := processContractDischarged assessed contract proof + refine ⟨by simp, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro facet hf; subst facet; exact List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl + · intro facet hf; have hf' := List.mem_singleton.mp hf; subst facet + exact ⟨rfl,canonicalArticulated _ discharged,canonicalFacetArticulated _,discharged⟩ +/- Universal output correctness here comes from the concrete program definition, not from an assumed capability label. -/ +theorem outputCorrectByEvaluation : OutputContract outputOnlyProcess := fun _ => rfl +/- This same process actually returns no explanation certificate. -/ +theorem outputOnlyNoExplanation : ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess := by + rintro ⟨program,h,_⟩; cases h +/- The full application contract requires outputs and an explanation of that same process. -/ +def FullProcessContract (assessed : Process) : Prop := OutputContract assessed ∧ ExplanationContract assessed +/- Output-only grounds have the assessed process itself as a counterworld to the stronger contract. -/ +def OutputContractEvidence : Prop := + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + Models (processScope outputOnlyProcess) outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬ Entails (processScope outputOnlyProcess) FullProcessContract +/- Existing output evidence does not supply the absent explanation for the same object and scope. -/ +theorem outputContractEvidence : OutputContractEvidence := by + refine ⟨processGrounds _ _ outputCorrectByEvaluation, (processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl, ?_⟩ + intro stronger + exact outputOnlyNoExplanation (stronger outputOnlyProcess ((processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl)).2 +/- Both actual application contracts have grounds and explicit object scopes; neither scope is empty. -/ +def ScopedApplicationEvidence : Prop := + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + ProcessGrounds explainedProcess FullProcessContract ∧ + (∀ candidate, Models (processScope outputOnlyProcess) candidate ↔ candidate = outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + (∀ candidate, Models (processScope explainedProcess) candidate ↔ candidate = explainedProcess) ∧ + Satisfiable (processScope outputOnlyProcess) ∧ Satisfiable (processScope explainedProcess) +/- Concrete evaluation and a faithful double-input certificate establish the two differently scoped contracts. -/ +theorem scopedApplicationEvidence : ScopedApplicationEvidence := by + refine ⟨processGrounds _ _ outputCorrectByEvaluation, processGrounds _ _ ?_, + processScopeModels _,processScopeModels _,⟨_,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨_,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩⟩ + exact ⟨fun _ => rfl,⟨.doubleInput,rfl,fun _ => rfl⟩⟩ +/- Universal output correctness does not entail the explanation-requiring contract for the same process. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem outputNotExplanation : OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ OutputContractEvidence := + ⟨outputCorrectByEvaluation, outputOnlyNoExplanation, outputContractEvidence⟩ +/- Applications may use distinct contracts, and a faithful certificate can satisfy the stronger one. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem applicationContractsDiffer : + (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ¬ (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess)) ∧ + (OutputContract explainedProcess ∧ ExplanationContract explainedProcess) ∧ + ScopedApplicationEvidence := + ⟨⟨outputCorrectByEvaluation, fun h => outputOnlyNoExplanation h.2⟩, + ⟨(fun _ => rfl), ⟨.doubleInput, rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩⟩, scopedApplicationEvidence⟩ +/- The assessor supplies a mathematical certificate; the process's own explanation response is unnecessary. -/ +structure ExternalCertificate (p : Process) where + assessorId : Nat + assessedId : Nat + distinctParticipants : assessorId ≠ assessedId + outputCorrect : ∀ n, p.output n = n + n +/- The external assessor 42 evaluates the specified process 7; the full output proof is constructed by evaluation. -/ +def externalOutputCertificate : ExternalCertificate outputOnlyProcess := + ⟨42,7,by decide,fun _ => rfl⟩ +/- An external certificate establishes the output contract without producing an internal explanation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem externalAssessment : + (∃ certificate : ExternalCertificate outputOnlyProcess, + certificate.assessorId = 42 ∧ certificate.assessedId = 7 ∧ + certificate.assessorId ≠ certificate.assessedId ∧ OutputContract outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess := + ⟨⟨externalOutputCertificate,rfl,rfl,externalOutputCertificate.distinctParticipants, + externalOutputCertificate.outputCorrect⟩, + processGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract externalOutputCertificate.outputCorrect, + outputOnlyNoExplanation⟩ +/- This argument records concepts and actual premises for a semantic inference, separately from executable tests. -/ +def arithmeticArticulation : Articulation Nat := canonicalArticulation arithmeticFacet +/- A reasoned inferential assessment needs no observation method, while applicable empirical assessment retains observations. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment +organon.relationships.terms#p1 sha256 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem nonExecutableAssessment : + Grounds (fun n : Nat => n + 1 = 3) canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = arithmeticFacet) [arithmeticFacet] ∧ + usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false ∧ + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ usesObservation switchEmpirical = true := by + refine ⟨⟨by simp, (by intro f hf; cases hf; simp), ?_⟩, rfl, switchEmpiricalDischarged, rfl⟩ + intro f hf; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hf; cases hf + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated _ noUniversalChain.1, canonicalFacetArticulated _, noUniversalChain.1⟩ + +end CoreReader.Evidence +``` + + + + **L1** Import CoreReader.Logic, making its checked declarations available to this module; this line states no new philosophical result. + + + **L2** Import CoreReader.Agency, making its checked declarations available to this module; this line states no new philosophical result. + + + **L4** Open namespace CoreReader.Evidence so subsequent declarations receive this module-qualified name. + + + **L5** Make names from CoreReader.Logic available without qualification; this changes name resolution, not assumptions. + + + **L6** Make names from CoreReader.Agency available without qualification; this changes name resolution, not assumptions. + + + **L8** Document the intended scope of Record. The corresponding declaration concerns: A record packages a supplied Boolean test and its supplied observed result; provenance and measurement reliability are not fields. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L9** Declare the data interface Record. A record packages a supplied Boolean test and its supplied observed result; provenance and measurement reliability are not fields. + + + **L10** Store a specified Boolean test that reads the actual represented world. + + + **L11** Store the observed Boolean outcome to which that test will be compared. + + + **L12** Document the intended scope of Compatible. The corresponding declaration concerns: A world is compatible when every listed test yields its recorded result. The empty record list admits every world. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L13** Define Compatible. A world is compatible when every listed test yields its recorded result. The empty record list admits every world. + + + **L14** Require every listed record’s actual test at w to equal that record’s observed outcome. + + + **L15** Document the intended scope of Supports. The corresponding declaration concerns: Support means that the claim holds in every compatible modeled world. It is semantic entailment from records, not a statistical confidence measure. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L16** Define Supports. Support means that the claim holds in every compatible modeled world. It is semantic entailment from records, not a statistical confidence measure. + + + **L17** Require the very claim to hold in every world compatible with all records; absent compatible worlds this implication alone can be vacuous. + + + **L18** Document the intended scope of Articulation. The corresponding declaration concerns: Packages concept strings, an assumption theory, a list of reason claims, and a scope/limits claim. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L19** Declare the data interface Articulation. Packages concept strings, an assumption theory, a list of reason claims, and a scope/limits claim. + + + **L20** Store identifiable concept names; strings alone do not establish semantic adequacy. + + + **L21** Store the actual theory stated as the articulation’s assumptions. + + + **L22** Store reason contents as propositions about the same world type. + + + **L23** Store the actual application-limit predicate for those reasons. + + + **L24** Document the intended scope of Articulated. The corresponding declaration concerns: Checks only that concept and reason lists are nonempty; it does not establish truth, relevance, or a relation to the target claim. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L25** Define Articulated. Checks only that concept and reason lists are nonempty; it does not establish truth, relevance, or a relation to the target claim. + + + **L26** Require nonempty concept and reason lists only; this procedural condition is weaker than matching, discharged Grounds. + + + **L27** Document the intended scope of ValuePosition. The corresponding declaration concerns: Represents an adopted option, selected option, option-indexed outcomes/reasons, objectives, constraints, starting theory, scope and criticism response; this is a disclosed application adapter. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L28** Declare the data interface ValuePosition. Represents an adopted option, selected option, option-indexed outcomes/reasons, objectives, constraints, starting theory, scope and criticism response; this is a disclosed application adapter. + + + **L29** Supply the type of options among which this value position adopts one. + + + **L30** Supply the outcome type used to interpret the effects of each option. + + + **L31** Specify which option is adopted, separately from which option a world actually selects. + + + **L32** Read the actually selected option from each world. + + + **L33** Interpret the actual outcome of each option at each world, rather than storing an arbitrary support label. + + + **L34** State the adopted objective as a predicate on outcomes; its value authority is not proved by this field. + + + **L35** State the world- and option-specific constraints checked alongside the objective. + + + **L36** Store the starting theory; JointAdoption will require it to share a real model with adoption and reasons. + + + **L37** Store reasons parameterized by both world and option, so switching the adopted option changes the assessed reasons. + + + **L38** Specify the scope within which this value-assessment procedure claims its conclusions. + + + **L39** Identify which worlds present relevant criticism; this is an explicit application predicate. + + + **L40** Store an optional textual response at each world; its presence does not prove that the criticism is answered adequately. + + + **L41** Document the intended scope of ValuePosition.commitment. The corresponding declaration concerns: The commitment claim says the world selects this position's adopted option; it is no longer a freely relabeled separate claim field. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L42** Define ValuePosition.commitment. The commitment claim says the world selects this position's adopted option; it is no longer a freely relabeled separate claim field. + + + **L43** Derive the commitment claim by equating actual selection with this very adopted option. + + + **L44** Document the intended scope of ValuePosition.consequence. The corresponding declaration concerns: Checks this adopted option's modeled outcome against its objective and constraints. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L45** Define ValuePosition.consequence. Checks this adopted option's modeled outcome against its objective and constraints. + + + **L46** Derive the assessed consequence from this adopted option’s actual outcome satisfying the objective and its actual constraints. + + + **L47** Document the intended scope of ValuePosition.activeReasons. The corresponding declaration concerns: Specializes every option-indexed reason to the adopted option for articulation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L48** Define ValuePosition.activeReasons. Specializes every option-indexed reason to the adopted option for articulation. + + + **L49** Specialize each option-indexed reason to the adopted option to produce its actual articulated world predicate. + + + **L50** Document the intended scope of JointAdoption. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires one world jointly modeling the starting theory, scope, actual adoption and all adopted-option reasons. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L51** Define JointAdoption. Requires one world jointly modeling the starting theory, scope, actual adoption and all adopted-option reasons. + + + **L52** Require one common world for starting assumptions, application limits and actual adoption. + + + **L53** At that same witness, require every listed reason for that adopted option to hold together. + + + **L54** Document the intended scope of ValueProcedure. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires nonempty reasons, a joint adoption witness, joint reasons supporting the option's consequence within starting assumptions/scope, and nonempty criticism responses. It does not prove ultimate value correctness. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L55** Define ValueProcedure. Requires nonempty reasons, a joint adoption witness, joint reasons supporting the option's consequence within starting assumptions/scope, and nonempty criticism responses. It does not prove ultimate value correctness. + + + **L56** Begin ValueProcedure with nonempty reasons and the complete joint adoption witness. + + + **L57** For every world satisfying the actual starting theory and limits, impose the following conditional consequence requirement. + + + **L58** Use the conjunction of all reasons for the adopted option to imply its actual consequence; no individual-reason sufficiency requirement is imposed. + + + **L59** Within limits, every relevant criticism must receive a specified nonempty response; this checks recorded response, not persuasiveness. + + + **L60** Document the intended scope of Facet. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines three distinct facet kinds with different discharge conditions. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L61** Declare the alternatives Facet. Defines three distinct facet kinds with different discharge conditions. + + + **L62** An empirical facet stores actual test records together with its scope, conclusion and stated uncertainty predicate. + + + **L63** An inferential facet stores its actual premise theory and the conclusion to be entailed from it. + + + **L64** A value facet stores the entire option/outcome position, including its starting theory, reasons, limits and criticism response. + + + **L65** Document the intended scope of Facet.claim. The corresponding declaration concerns: Extracts the target claim of a facet, using the commitment rather than consequence for a value facet. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L66** Define Facet.claim. Extracts the target claim of a facet, using the commitment rather than consequence for a value facet. + + + **L67** Read the empirical facet’s own conclusion p as its claim; records, scope and uncertainty remain assessment inputs. + + + **L68** Read the inferential facet’s own conclusion p as its claim, separately from its premise theory. + + + **L69** The value facet’s claim is actual selection equaling its own adopted option, derived through v.commitment. + + + **L70** Document the intended scope of FacetDischarged. The corresponding declaration concerns: Dispatches to a different check for each facet kind; these checks have different truth guarantees. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L71** Define FacetDischarged. Dispatches to a different check for each facet kind; these checks have different truth guarantees. + + + **L72** Enter the empirical discharge case with this facet’s actual records, scope, conclusion p and uncertainty predicate. + + + **L73** For an empirical facet, require a world compatible with its records and inside its scope, excluding an empty empirical domain. + + + **L74** Require the records to support the scoped conclusion and the explicitly stated uncertainty predicate. + + + **L75** Inferential discharge requires a nonempty model of the actual assumptions and semantic entailment of p from those same assumptions. + + + **L76** Value discharge is exactly the declared ValueProcedure for that same position, not a proof of ultimate value adequacy. + + + **L77** Document the intended scope of FacetArticulated. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires articulation fields to match the facet's own assumptions, reasons and limits; concept strings are not constrained here. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L78** Define FacetArticulated. Requires articulation fields to match the facet's own assumptions, reasons and limits; concept strings are not constrained here. + + + **L79** In the empirical articulation case, read the actual records and scope whose assumptions/reasons/limits must match. + + + **L80** This empirical adapter equates articulated assumptions and reasons with actual record compatibility, and articulated limits with the empirical scope. + + + **L81** In the inferential case, use this facet’s actual assumption theory as the articulation’s reference. + + + **L82** This inferential adapter retains the exact premise theory, articulates its model condition as the reason, and uses unrestricted additional limits. + + + **L83** Require value articulation to use exactly this position’s starting theory, adopted-option active reasons and limits. + + + **L84** Document the intended scope of canonicalArticulation. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs field-aligned articulations by pattern matching; the fixed concept strings are descriptive labels. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L85** Define canonicalArticulation. Constructs field-aligned articulations by pattern matching; the fixed concept strings are descriptive labels. + + + **L86** Construct the empirical canonical articulation from the actual record list and scope of the selected facet. + + + **L87** Construct empirical articulation naming test outcomes and conditions, using the actual compatibility claim as its premise/reason and the original scope as its limit. + + + **L88** Construct inferential canonical articulation from this facet’s actual premise theory. + + + **L89** Construct inferential articulation from the same theory and its actual model predicate, with no extra limit. + + + **L90** Construct the value articulation using the same complete position v. + + + **L91** Construct value articulation from the actual starting theory, adopted-option reasons and original limits. + + + **L92** Document the intended scope of canonicalFacetArticulated. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves all canonical articulations have the required field alignment; no discharge hypothesis is needed for equality by construction. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L93** State the checked result canonicalFacetArticulated. Proves all canonical articulations have the required field alignment; no discharge hypothesis is needed for equality by construction. + + + **L94** Assert that canonical articulation is semantically connected to this very facet; the proof checks each facet constructor. + + + **L95** Split the three facet constructors; each canonical articulation has exactly the assumptions, reasons and limits required by its matching branch, so all three equalities are reflexive. + + + **L96** Document the intended scope of canonicalArticulated. The corresponding declaration concerns: Given a discharged facet, proves its canonical concept/reason lists are nonempty. The value case uses the discharge premise's reason nonemptiness. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L97** State the checked result canonicalArticulated. Given a discharged facet, proves its canonical concept/reason lists are nonempty. The value case uses the discharge premise's reason nonemptiness. + + + **L98** Given this facet’s discharge, require its canonical concepts and reasons to be nonempty. + + + **L99** Check canonical articulation separately for empirical, inferential and value facets. + + + **L100** In this empirical or inferential branch, the canonical concept and reason lists are explicitly nonempty; simplification verifies both articulation requirements. + + + **L101** In this empirical or inferential branch, the canonical concept and reason lists are explicitly nonempty; simplification verifies both articulation requirements. + + + **L102** For the value branch, the premise h is ValueProcedure v; its nonempty reasons must establish nonempty canonical active reasons. + + + **L103** For a value facet, supply nonempty canonical concepts and leave the nonempty active-reason obligation. + + + **L104** Use the discharged value procedure’s nonempty reasons; specializing them to the adopted option preserves nonemptiness. + + + **L105** Document the intended scope of Grounds. The corresponding declaration concerns: Grounds packages a nonempty facet list, coverage of a supplied applicability predicate, common claim identity, articulation presence/alignment, and every listed facet's discharge. It is not uniformly a truth certificate for the claim. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L106** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L107** Register source unit organon.grounds#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L108** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L109** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L110** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L111** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L112** Define Grounds. Grounds packages a nonempty facet list, coverage of a supplied applicability predicate, common claim identity, articulation presence/alignment, and every listed facet's discharge. It is not uniformly a truth certificate for the claim. + + + **L113** Take actualApplicable independently of the finite list, so coverage is an explicit obligation rather than inferred from list membership. + + + **L114** Require a nonempty facet list and inclusion of every facet satisfying actualApplicable. + + + **L115** For every listed facet, require the exact claim and a nonempty articulation belonging to that facet. + + + **L116** Also require semantic matching to its actual premises/reasons/limits and discharge by its declared adapter. + + + **L117** Document the intended scope of AchievementAccountability. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines achievement accountability as exactly the same Grounds predicate, with no additional execution or achievement proof. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L118** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L119** Register source unit organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L120** Register source unit organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L121** Register source unit organon.grounds#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L122** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L123** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L124** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L125** Define AchievementAccountability. Defines achievement accountability as exactly the same Grounds predicate, with no additional execution or achievement proof. + + + **L126** Achievement accountability accepts the same actual-applicability predicate and facet list as Grounds. + + + **L127** Define accountability directly by Grounds for the very achievement claim; no extra universal observation requirement is added. + + + **L128** Document the intended scope of transitionAchievement. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines achievement as understanding/construction expansion between the same modeled transition's before and after states. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L129** Define transitionAchievement. Defines achievement as understanding/construction expansion between the same modeled transition's before and after states. + + + **L130** The achievement claim is actual expansion between the selected transition’s own before and after states. + + + **L131** Document the intended scope of transitionPerformanceRecord. The corresponding declaration concerns: Tests whether that after-state contains successor actually returning one at the transition input, within the two-transition model. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L132** Define transitionPerformanceRecord. Tests whether that after-state contains successor actually returning one at the transition input, within the two-transition model. + + + **L133** The performance test inspects operations actually constructed in this transition’s after-state. + + + **L134** It records true only when successor is present and actually sends the shared transition input to 1. + + + **L135** Document the intended scope of transitionReportRecord. The corresponding declaration concerns: Records only the report's announced operation/input/output, not its actual achievement. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L136** Define transitionReportRecord. Records only the report's announced operation/input/output, not its actual achievement. + + + **L137** Begin a record whose test reads the actual transition’s announcement. + + + **L138** Bind report to the announcement generated for this same transition. + + + **L139** Test its stated successor, input 0 and expected output 1, recording a positive announcement independently of whether the operation exists. + + + **L140** Document the intended scope of transitionPerformanceCompatible. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhausts inflate/extend to show the actual performance record identifies extension. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L141** State the checked result transitionPerformanceCompatible. Exhausts inflate/extend to show the actual performance record identifies extension. + + + **L142** Claim that matching the actual positive performance record is equivalent to selecting extend. + + + **L143** Fix an arbitrary actual transition, either inflate or extend, for the record-compatibility equivalence. + + + **L144** Prove both directions: performance compatibility implies extend, and extend supplies compatibility. + + + **L145** Assume this transition matches the actual positive performance record. + + + **L146** Apply compatibility to the actual singleton performance record to obtain its observed test result for this transition. + + + **L147** Split the actual transition into inflate and extend, whose after-states have different operation content. + + + **L148** The inflate state lacks successor, so its performance test cannot equal the recorded true outcome. + + + **L149** The extend case has the required transition identity by reflexivity. + + + **L150** For the reverse implication, substitute the assumption that the transition is extend. + + + **L151** Membership in the singleton record list identifies the arbitrary record with this exact transition record; substitute it before checking its test. + + + **L152** Evaluate the actual extend performance record; its successor-at-zero test equals the recorded true outcome. + + + **L153** Document the intended scope of transitionSupported. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses performance identification, the concrete new operation and report claim to establish transition expansion in every compatible case. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L154** State the checked result transitionSupported. Uses performance identification, the concrete new operation and report claim to establish transition expansion in every compatible case. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L155** Take an arbitrary transition and its compatibility with the actual performance record; prove expansion for that same transition. + + + **L156** Use transitionPerformanceCompatible to identify every performance-compatible transition as extend. + + + **L157** Substitute extend for the transition, so the remaining achievement claim concerns its real extended after-state. + + + **L158** Check the same system-generated extend report against its actual before/after states: successor is newly constructed and sends input 0 to output 1. + + + **L159** Check the same system-generated extend report against its actual before/after states: successor is newly constructed and sends input 0 to output 1. + + + **L160** Check the same system-generated extend report against its actual before/after states: successor is newly constructed and sends input 0 to output 1. + + + **L161** Apply announcementClaimImpliesExpansion to the verified report content to obtain the same transition’s Expanded claim. + + + **L162** Document the intended scope of transitionFacet. The corresponding declaration concerns: Packages the performance record, input-zero scope and exact expansion claim as an empirical facet. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L163** Define transitionFacet. Packages the performance record, input-zero scope and exact expansion claim as an empirical facet. + + + **L164** Build an empirical facet from the performance record with the exact input-0 transition scope. + + + **L165** Its conclusion is the same transition’s achievement; its uncertainty predicate is explicitly True. + + + **L166** Document the intended scope of transitionFacetDischarged. The corresponding declaration concerns: Supplies extension as a nonempty witness, actual support and trivial uncertainty. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L167** State the checked result transitionFacetDischarged. Supplies extension as a nonempty witness, actual support and trivial uncertainty. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L168** Provide extend as the nonempty empirical witness with compatible performance evidence and the shared input-0 scope; leave scoped support and uncertainty checks. + + + **L169** The already proved transition support supplies the achievement at any compatible transition, hence within the chosen scope. + + + **L170** The explicitly unrestricted uncertainty predicate is True, so this adapter component is immediate; no quantitative uncertainty bound is inferred. + + + **L171** Document the intended scope of transitionAccountable. The corresponding declaration concerns: Builds achievement Grounds with matching claim, scope, canonical articulation and discharged facet. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L172** State the checked result transitionAccountable. Builds achievement Grounds with matching claim, scope, canonical articulation and discharged facet. + + + **L173** State accountability for the actual transition-achievement predicate with canonical articulation. + + + **L174** Declare transitionFacet the only applicable facet and use precisely that singleton evidence package. + + + **L175** Split accountability into nonempty facets, coverage of actual applicability, and matching articulated discharge for each included facet. + + + **L176** The applicability assumption identifies the facet with the one prescribed facet, which belongs to the singleton list. + + + **L177** Singleton membership identifies the current facet with the prescribed one; substitute it to check its exact claim and grounds. + + + **L178** Assemble identical claim, nonempty canonical articulation, its semantic connection to this facet, and transitionFacetDischarged. + + + **L179** Assemble identical claim, nonempty canonical articulation, its semantic connection to this facet, and transitionFacetDischarged. + + + **L180** Document the intended scope of transitionReportCompatible. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows both transition cases produce the same announced operation/input/output record. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L181** State the checked result transitionReportCompatible. Shows both transition cases produce the same announced operation/input/output record. + + + **L182** State that this transition’s positive report record is compatible with the transition itself, including inflate. + + + **L183** Membership in the singleton record list identifies the arbitrary record with this exact transition record; substitute it before checking its test. + + + **L184** The report test only checks the actual positive announcement contents, which evaluate identically for either transition. + + + **L185** Document the intended scope of transitionReportDoesNotSupport. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses the inflated transition as a report-compatible non-achievement countermodel. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L186** State the checked result transitionReportDoesNotSupport. Uses the inflated transition as a report-compatible non-achievement countermodel. + + + **L187** Require inflate to match the report while failing the same achievement predicate. + + + **L188** Conclude that the positive report records therefore do not support the achievement over all compatible transitions. + + + **L189** Unfold the inflate transition: both understood and constructed operation sets are unchanged, so no new-operation witness for Expanded exists. + + + **L190** Unfold the inflate transition: both understood and constructed operation sets are unchanged, so no new-operation witness for Expanded exists. + + + **L191** Combine positive-report compatibility with the false expansion claim at inflate; any claimed support applied there gives a contradiction. + + + **L192** Document the intended scope of ConcreteAchievementExample. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines same-object achievement accountability and supported extension with an unsupported inflation report, preserving before/after/input identities. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L193** Define ConcreteAchievementExample. Combines same-object achievement accountability and supported extension with an unsupported inflation report, preserving before/after/input identities. + + + **L194** The concrete example includes actual accountability for the transition achievement. + + + **L195** Its actual-applicability predicate and list identify the same single transition facet. + + + **L196** Require extend to satisfy the actual performance observation. + + + **L197** Require semantic support for the achievement and its truth at extend. + + + **L198** Also retain the report-compatible inflate world in which this achievement is false. + + + **L199** State the resulting failure of support from reports alone. + + + **L200** For every transition, bind the report’s before state to the actual transition-before state. + + + **L201** Bind its after state to that same transition’s actual after state. + + + **L202** Bind the report input to the actual transition input and explicitly fix that condition to 0. + + + **L203** Document the intended scope of concreteAchievementExample. The corresponding declaration concerns: Assembles the concrete performance support, reporting countermodel and exact state/input links. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L204** State the checked result concreteAchievementExample. Assembles the concrete performance support, reporting countermodel and exact state/input links. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L205** Assemble the actual achievement’s accountability, extend performance compatibility and semantic support in the concrete example. + + + **L206** Apply that same support to the extend witness to establish actual expansion there. + + + **L207** Include the report-compatible inflate counterexample and leave the same-before/after/input relationships. + + + **L208** For either transition, all report-to-state and input-0 links hold by the definitions themselves. + + + **L209** Document the intended scope of achievementNeedsSupport. The corresponding declaration concerns: Applies supplied compatible-world support to the arbitrary actual claim and separately includes the checked concrete transition example. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L210** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L211** Register source unit organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L212** Register source unit organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L213** Register source unit organon.grounds#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L214** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L215** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L216** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L217** State the checked result achievementNeedsSupport. Applies supplied compatible-world support to the arbitrary actual claim and separately includes the checked concrete transition example. + + + **L218** Assume the chosen actual world matches all records and those records already support the achievement. + + + **L219** Conclude truth of the achievement at that actual world, together with the separately constructed concrete achievement example. + + + **L220** Apply the assumed support to the actual evidence-compatible world, and pair that local truth with the separately proved concrete achievement example. + + + **L221** Document the intended scope of supportWeakening. The corresponding declaration concerns: Preserves support when a supported claim implies a weaker claim at every world; it does not weaken the record set. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L222** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L223** Register source unit organon.grounds#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L224** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L225** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L226** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L227** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L228** State the checked result supportWeakening. Preserves support when a supported claim implies a weaker claim at every world; it does not weaken the record set. + + + **L229** Assume support for p and a world-by-world implication from p to q; conclude support for q using the same records. + + + **L230** At each compatible world w, first derive p using the unchanged records, then apply the supplied implication weaker to obtain q. + + + **L231** Document the intended scope of evidenceWeakeningCanLoseSupport. The corresponding declaration concerns: Provides a true Boolean observation supporting equality to true and shows deleting that record loses this support. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L232** State the checked result evidenceWeakeningCanLoseSupport. Provides a true Boolean observation supporting equality to true and shows deleting that record loses this support. + + + **L233** The single identity observation supports that the Boolean world is true. + + + **L234** Deleting that observation leaves empty records, which do not support the unchanged claim. + + + **L235** Split the supported one-record claim from the failure of the same claim after deleting that record. + + + **L236** Read the informative identity test from compatibility; it directly states that the Boolean world is true. + + + **L237** With no records, false is compatible; evaluating purported support there refutes the unchanged true-world claim. + + + **L238** Document the intended scope of scopeRestriction. The corresponding declaration concerns: Restricts a universally supported property from a wider input domain to an included narrower domain, for arbitrary world and input types. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L239** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L240** Register source unit organon.grounds#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L241** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L242** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L243** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L244** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L245** State the checked result scopeRestriction. Restricts a universally supported property from a wider input domain to an included narrower domain, for arbitrary world and input types. + + + **L246** Take broad and narrow application domains and assume every narrow-domain input is in the broad domain. + + + **L247** Assume the same records support p at every input in the broad domain. + + + **L248** Conclude support at every input in the narrower domain; neither the evidence nor predicate p changes. + + + **L249** For a compatible world and narrow-domain input x, included converts narrow membership to broad membership; apply the original broad support there. + + + **L250** Document the intended scope of Duties. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires every facet satisfying the supplied applicability predicate to be discharged. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L251** Define Duties. Requires every facet satisfying the supplied applicability predicate to be discharged. + + + **L252** Require every actually applicable facet to pass its own discharge condition. + + + **L253** Define LabeledDuties. Defines labeled duties by ignoring all labels and keeping only the applicability-based duties. + + + **L254** Define labeled duties by exactly the original applicability duties; the labels supply no waiver. + + + **L255** Document the intended scope of assessmentUnion. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves that discharging the union of two applicability predicates is equivalent to discharging each separately. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L256** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L257** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L258** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L259** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L260** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L261** State the checked result assessmentUnion. Proves that discharging the union of two applicability predicates is equivalent to discharging each separately. + + + **L262** Equate duties for the union of two applicability predicates with fulfillment of both sets of duties. + + + **L263** Prove both directions between duty on the union applicability predicate and simultaneous duties on its two components. + + + **L264** Restrict the union duty to each applicable-facet predicate using the matching disjunction injection. + + + **L265** Unpack both duty sets, split actual applicability into its left/right case, and discharge that very facet using the corresponding duty. + + + **L266** Document the intended scope of labelsCannotWaive. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves changing labels cannot change duties because labels were ignored by definition; no external classification mechanism is analyzed. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L267** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L268** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L269** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L270** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L271** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L272** State the checked result labelsCannotWaive. Proves changing labels cannot change duties because labels were ignored by definition; no external classification mechanism is analyzed. + + + **L273** Changing only the label lists leaves the same duty proposition; the equivalence is reflexive. + + + **L274** Document the intended scope of switchRecord. The corresponding declaration concerns: Records the identity Boolean test with observed value true. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L275** Define switchRecord. Records the identity Boolean test with observed value true. + + + **L276** State the checked result switchCompatible. Proves compatibility with the single switch record is exactly equality of the world with true. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L277** Prove that compatibility with the singleton switch record is equivalent to the actual Boolean world being true. + + + **L278** Apply record compatibility to the sole named test to recover its actual observed equality. + + + **L279** Conversely, singleton membership identifies any listed record with this test, whose equality is the supplied observation premise. + + + **L280** State the checked result switchSupported. Supports equality to true by extracting the previously proved compatibility equivalence. The supplied proof term uses the displayed constructed witnesses or earlier lemmas, rather than adding an axiom. + + + **L281** Use switchCompatible’s forward implication to extract world=true from the same world’s actual record compatibility. + + + **L282** Document the intended scope of optionBenefit. The corresponding declaration concerns: Assigns benefit 4 to selected=true and 0 otherwise. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L283** Define optionBenefit. Assigns benefit 4 to selected=true and 0 otherwise. + + + **L284** Define optionCost. Assigns cost 3 to selected=true and 0 otherwise. + + + **L285** Document the intended scope of optionReport. The corresponding declaration concerns: States option-specific cost and benefit facts rather than an unconnected reason flag. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L286** Define optionReport. States option-specific cost and benefit facts rather than an unconnected reason flag. + + + **L287** The option report asserts actual cost at most 3 and the option-specific benefit of 4 for on or 0 for off. + + + **L288** Document the intended scope of switchPosition. The corresponding declaration concerns: Adopts true with actual option cost/benefit outcomes, cost-below-benefit objective, budget constraint and a scoped criticism response. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L289** Define switchPosition. Adopts true with actual option cost/benefit outcomes, cost-below-benefit objective, budget constraint and a scoped criticism response. + + + **L290** Use Boolean options for on/off. + + + **L291** Represent each outcome as actual benefit and cost in a natural-number pair. + + + **L292** Adopt the on option explicitly; adoption itself is not derived from arithmetic. + + + **L293** Read the actual selected option directly from the Boolean world. + + + **L294** Compute benefit and cost from this same actual option. + + + **L295** Adopt the objective that actual benefit strictly exceeds actual cost. + + + **L296** Check the actual option cost against the fixed budget 3. + + + **L297** Assume the actual Boolean selection is on; do not insert the assessed benefit conclusion into the starting theory. + + + **L298** Use the option-indexed actual cost/benefit report as the sole reason. + + + **L299** Use an unrestricted world scope in this example; starting assumptions and reason content still constrain the procedure. + + + **L300** Mark the off-selected world as a relevant criticism case. + + + **L301** Provide distinct nonempty messages for the two worlds, including budget reconsideration in the criticism case. + + + **L302** State the checked result switchValueProcedure. Provides a consistent adoption witness and derives the adopted option's objective/constraint from its actual cost-benefit reason; both Boolean responses are checked. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L303** Separate nonempty reasons, a joint adoption witness, consequence support by all reasons, and response to criticism for switchPosition. + + + **L304** Choose world true, satisfying the starting selection, unrestricted limit and adopted option, and leave its actual reason to check. + + + **L305** Take any reason in switchPosition’s list; the next step identifies its actual optionReport content at the adopted on witness. + + + **L306** Singleton membership identifies the arbitrary reason with optionReport specialized to this position’s adopted option; substitute that actual reason. + + + **L307** Singleton membership identifies the arbitrary reason with optionReport specialized to this position’s adopted option; substitute that actual reason. + + + **L308** Check that the adopted on option meets its recorded cost bound and its stated benefit value. + + + **L309** For an arbitrary world in the stated starting/limit conditions, assume the entire active-reason conjunction. + + + **L310** Extract the actual optionReport reason from that conjunction, rather than introducing an independent support label. + + + **L311** Unfold which option is adopted: this evidence concerns the on option. + + + **L312** Use the reported benefit equality to prove the on option’s benefit exceeds 3. + + + **L313** Combine cost ≤ 3 with benefit > 3 to prove cost < benefit, and retain the same cost bound as the constraint. + + + **L314** Check both Boolean worlds to provide the recorded nonempty criticism response where required. + + + **L315** Document the intended scope of oppositePosition. The corresponding declaration concerns: Changes the adopted option to false and updates its starting selection while retaining the same outcome model and objective. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L316** Define oppositePosition. Changes the adopted option to false and updates its starting selection while retaining the same outcome model and objective. + + + **L317** Change both adopted option and starting selection to off while retaining the same actual outcome/reason interpretation. + + + **L318** Document the intended scope of oppositePositionRejected. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows false can be jointly adopted but fails the unchanged cost-below-benefit objective, so its value procedure is rejected. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L319** State the checked result oppositePositionRejected. Shows false can be jointly adopted but fails the unchanged cost-below-benefit objective, so its value procedure is rejected. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L320** Construct an actual joint adoption witness for the opposite off position at world false; the rejection will therefore not rely on an empty domain. + + + **L321** Construct an actual joint adoption witness for the opposite off position at world false; the rejection will therefore not rely on an empty domain. + + + **L322** For the opposite position’s false-world witness, take any listed reason before checking that off option’s actual report. + + + **L323** Singleton membership identifies the arbitrary reason with optionReport specialized to this position’s adopted option; substitute that actual reason. + + + **L324** Singleton membership identifies the arbitrary reason with optionReport specialized to this position’s adopted option; substitute that actual reason. + + + **L325** The off option’s own report is true: its zero cost is within the bound and its zero benefit matches the stated report. + + + **L326** Retain the nonempty joint witness and separately refute fulfillment of the opposite value procedure. + + + **L327** Assume the opposite off position satisfies its entire ValueProcedure, to derive a contradiction with its zero-benefit outcome. + + + **L328** Assemble all of the opposite position’s reasons at its actual false-world witness before applying any consequence requirement. + + + **L329** Take any actual reason of the opposite position to assemble all reasons at its inhabited false-world counterexample. + + + **L330** Singleton membership identifies the arbitrary reason with optionReport specialized to this position’s adopted option; substitute that actual reason. + + + **L331** Singleton membership identifies the arbitrary reason with optionReport specialized to this position’s adopted option; substitute that actual reason. + + + **L332** The off option’s own report is true: its zero cost is within the bound and its zero benefit matches the stated report. + + + **L333** Apply the assumed opposite procedure’s joint-reason consequence clause to that same starting/limit witness and all its actual reasons. + + + **L334** Its purported objective would require the off option’s zero cost to be strictly less than its zero benefit, contradicting irreflexivity. + + + **L335** Document the intended scope of contradictoryStartingPosition. The corresponding declaration concerns: Replaces the starting theory with a false singleton, eliminating every joint adoption witness. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L336** Define contradictoryStartingPosition. Replaces the starting theory with a false singleton, eliminating every joint adoption witness. + + + **L337** Replace the starting theory with the impossible singleton claim False. + + + **L338** Define impossibleAdoptionPosition. Always selects false while retaining adoption of true, making joint adoption impossible. + + + **L339** Keep the adopted on option but make every actual selection off, making joint adoption impossible. + + + **L340** Document the intended scope of inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected. The corresponding declaration concerns: Rejects both inconsistent starting theory and impossible adoption via the required witness. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L341** State the checked result inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected. Rejects both inconsistent starting theory and impossible adoption via the required witness. + + + **L342** Reject the procedures for contradictory starting assumptions and impossible actual adoption separately. + + + **L343** Separate rejection of the contradictory starting theory from rejection of the impossible selected/adopted combination. + + + **L344** Extract a joint adoption witness from the alleged procedure for the contradictory starting position. + + + **L345** The singleton starting theory requires False at that witness, directly contradicting its model proof. + + + **L346** Extract the adoption equality from the alleged joint witness for the impossible selected/adopted combination. + + + **L347** The required adoption equality equates distinct Boolean options, so this witness cannot exist. + + + **L348** Document the intended scope of unsupportedPosition. The corresponding declaration concerns: Copies the switch value position but deletes its reasons, guaranteeing procedural failure. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L349** Define unsupportedPosition. Copies the switch value position but deletes its reasons, guaranteeing procedural failure. + + + **L350** Define switchEmpirical. Builds an empirical facet concluding the Boolean world is true from the switch record, with unrestricted scope and trivially true uncertainty. + + + **L351** Use the actual switch observation, unrestricted scope and same selected-on claim; uncertainty is explicitly True. + + + **L352** State the checked result switchEmpiricalDischarged. Discharges that empirical facet with a true-world witness, semantic support, and trivial uncertainty. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L353** Use true as a nonempty world compatible with the switch record and unrestricted empirical scope. + + + **L354** The same switch record’s semantic support proves the scoped switch claim at each compatible world. + + + **L355** Discharge the explicitly trivial uncertainty predicate, without adding an empirical confidence claim. + + + **L356** Document the intended scope of mixedMissingResponsibility. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows a discharged empirical facet does not discharge a union of applicable facets when an included value facet has no reasons. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L357** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L358** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L359** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L360** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L361** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L362** State the checked result mixedMissingResponsibility. Shows a discharged empirical facet does not discharge a union of applicable facets when an included value facet has no reasons. + + + **L363** Retain successful discharge of the actual empirical switch facet. + + + **L364** Deny all mixed duties even with empty labels, because the actual value facet also applies and lacks recorded reasons. + + + **L365** Keep the valid empirical switch facet and separately refute completion of all mixed duties. + + + **L366** Assume every actual mixed facet is discharged, including the value facet whose recorded reason list is empty. + + + **L367** Select the value facet from the actual applicability union and extract its required nonempty reason-list condition. + + + **L368** Its reason list is definitionally empty, contradicting only that recorded procedural requirement. + + + **L369** Document the intended scope of uninformativeArgument. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs a nonempty articulation with no assumptions and a tautological reason; it carries no information about the switch conclusion. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L370** Define uninformativeArgument. Constructs a nonempty articulation with no assumptions and a tautological reason; it carries no information about the switch conclusion. + + + **L371** Articulate a switch concept with empty assumptions and a True reason; these nonempty words do not constrain the switch world. + + + **L372** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L373** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L374** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L375** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L376** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L377** State the checked result articulationNotSupport. Proves this articulation passes the nonemptiness check while its assumptions do not entail that the world is true. + + + **L378** The uninformative articulation’s actual assumptions do not entail that the world is true. + + + **L379** Pair nonempty but uninformative concepts/reasons with the empty theory’s established failure to entail the switch claim. + + + **L380** Pair nonempty but uninformative concepts/reasons with the empty theory’s established failure to entail the switch claim. + + + **L381** Document the intended scope of unrelatedArticulationRejected. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows that a nonempty unrelated articulation and a discharged empirical facet need not align, and rejects this concrete pairing. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L382** State the checked result unrelatedArticulationRejected. Shows that a nonempty unrelated articulation and a discharged empirical facet need not align, and rejects this concrete pairing. + + + **L383** Keep the unrelated articulation procedurally present and the switch facet actually discharged. + + + **L384** Still reject semantic matching between that unrelated articulation and this empirical facet. + + + **L385** Retain articulation and valid switch evidence, then separately test whether this unrelated articulation actually matches the facet. + + + **L386** Assume the uninformative articulation semantically matches switchEmpirical, despite its empty premise theory. + + + **L387** Evaluate the alleged equality of articulation assumptions and empirical compatibility assumptions on the compatibility claim itself. + + + **L388** The empirical singleton contains that compatibility claim, while the unrelated empty theory cannot; the alleged equality yields False. + + + **L389** Close this component of unrelatedArticulationRejected using the displayed local evidence or previously proved lemma; the component belongs to the following fixed result: Shows that a nonempty unrelated articulation and a discharged empirical facet need not align, and rejects this concrete pairing. + + + **L390** Document the intended scope of temperatureRecord. The corresponding declaration concerns: Records only the first coordinate of a Boolean pair, observed as true; the second coordinate is unmeasured. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L391** Define temperatureRecord. Records only the first coordinate of a Boolean pair, observed as true; the second coordinate is unmeasured. + + + **L392** State the checked result temperatureCompatible. Shows duplicating that record remains compatible with either second-coordinate value when the first is true. + + + **L393** For any output coordinate b, repeated temperature records remain compatible with (true,b). + + + **L394** For either output coordinate b, singleton-style membership in the repeated list selects the same temperature test; its observed first coordinate is true and leaves b unconstrained. + + + **L395** For either output coordinate b, singleton-style membership in the repeated list selects the same temperature test; its observed first coordinate is true and leaves b unconstrained. + + + **L396** For either output coordinate b, singleton-style membership in the repeated list selects the same temperature test; its observed first coordinate is true and leaves b unconstrained. + + + **L397** For either output coordinate b, singleton-style membership in the repeated list selects the same temperature test; its observed first coordinate is true and leaves b unconstrained. + + + **L398** Document the intended scope of BudgetWorld. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses a Boolean action coordinate and natural-number budget as the world type. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L399** Introduce the type abbreviation BudgetWorld. Uses a Boolean action coordinate and natural-number budget as the world type. + + + **L400** Document the intended scope of announcement. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines a fixed declaration string; its content is not linked to budget. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L401** Define announcement. Defines a fixed declaration string; its content is not linked to budget. + + + **L402** Define announcementPosition. Uses an action announcement as the sole option-indexed reason while requiring actual benefit/cost and available budget. + + + **L403** Use Boolean options for on/off. + + + **L404** Represent each outcome as actual benefit and cost in a natural-number pair. + + + **L405** Adopt the on option explicitly; adoption itself is not derived from arithmetic. + + + **L406** Read actual selection from the first coordinate while leaving budget independently variable. + + + **L407** Compute benefit and cost from this same actual option. + + + **L408** Adopt the objective that actual benefit strictly exceeds actual cost. + + + **L409** Compare the adopted option’s actual cost with this world’s independently supplied budget. + + + **L410** Fix selection to on without any affordability or budget assumption. + + + **L411** Use the actual option-specific announcement text as the reason; it says nothing about available budget. + + + **L412** Use an unrestricted world scope in this example; starting assumptions and reason content still constrain the procedure. + + + **L413** Treat budget below 3 as relevant criticism of this cost-3 action. + + + **L414** Record a nonempty message about reconsidering the action when cost exceeds budget. + + + **L415** Document the intended scope of announcementHasJointAdoption. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs an action-true budget-zero world where the announcement reason holds; failure later is substantive, not absent adoption. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L416** State the checked result announcementHasJointAdoption. Constructs an action-true budget-zero world where the announcement reason holds; failure later is substantive, not absent adoption. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L417** Choose selected-on with budget 0 as a joint adoption witness; the starting theory fixes selection but does not assume affordability. + + + **L418** Take an arbitrary announcement reason at the selected-on, zero-budget joint witness. + + + **L419** Use membership to identify the actual reason as the option-indexed announcement text, then specialize it to the adopted on option. + + + **L420** Use membership to identify the actual reason as the option-indexed announcement text, then specialize it to the adopted on option. + + + **L421** Use membership to identify the actual reason as the option-indexed announcement text, then specialize it to the adopted on option. + + + **L422** The actual announcement equals the on option’s activation text; this proves the announcement reason, not the budget constraint. + + + **L423** Document the intended scope of announcementNotBudgetReason. The corresponding declaration concerns: At budget zero, the adopted action and true nonempty announcement reasons fail the real budget consequence, refuting the procedure. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L424** State the checked result announcementNotBudgetReason. At budget zero, the adopted action and true nonempty announcement reasons fail the real budget consequence, refuting the procedure. + + + **L425** Require nonempty announcement reasons and actual adoption at selected-on with budget 0. + + + **L426** At that same zero-budget world, all actual announcement reasons hold. + + + **L427** Nevertheless reject the actual consequence and the whole value procedure. + + + **L428** Assemble nonempty announcement reasons and the true announcement; refute the zero-budget consequence and leave failure of the whole procedure. + + + **L429** For the claimed conjunction of reasons at budget 0, take any member of the actual announcement reason list. + + + **L430** Use membership to identify the actual reason as the option-indexed announcement text, then specialize it to the adopted on option. + + + **L431** Use membership to identify the actual reason as the option-indexed announcement text, then specialize it to the adopted on option. + + + **L432** The actual announcement equals the on option’s activation text; this proves the announcement reason, not the budget constraint. + + + **L433** Assume the announcement position satisfies ValueProcedure, to test its consequence clause at budget 0. + + + **L434** Collect every announcement reason at the same selected-on, zero-budget world. + + + **L435** To supply all reasons to that clause, take any announcement reason at the same zero-budget world. + + + **L436** Use membership to identify the actual reason as the option-indexed announcement text, then specialize it to the adopted on option. + + + **L437** Use membership to identify the actual reason as the option-indexed announcement text, then specialize it to the adopted on option. + + + **L438** The actual announcement equals the on option’s activation text; this proves the announcement reason, not the budget constraint. + + + **L439** Apply a hypothetical procedure to that inhabited zero-budget starting/limit case and its actual announcement reason. + + + **L440** The resulting cost constraint would require cost 3 within budget 0, which is impossible. + + + **L441** Document the intended scope of actionRecord. The corresponding declaration concerns: Records only the action Boolean, leaving budget completely unconstrained. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L442** Define actionRecord. Records only the action Boolean, leaving budget completely unconstrained. + + + **L443** State the checked result actionCompatible. Shows two copies of the action record accept every budget when action=true. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L444** Every action record in the repeated list tests only the actual selected-on coordinate, so any supplied budget remains compatible. + + + **L445** Document the intended scope of measurementRepeatNotSupport. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines explicit countermodels showing that repeated measurement of one coordinate does not support an unmeasured coordinate or a budget consequence, and does not fix the announcement value procedure. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L446** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L447** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L448** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L449** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L450** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L451** State the checked result measurementRepeatNotSupport. Combines explicit countermodels showing that repeated measurement of one coordinate does not support an unmeasured coordinate or a budget consequence, and does not fix the announcement value procedure. + + + **L452** The actual temperature test returns true even when the independent output coordinate is false. + + + **L453** Retain this false-output world under repeated temperature observations. + + + **L454** Also retain a true-output world under those same repeated observations. + + + **L455** A single temperature record does not support the other output being true. + + + **L456** Repeating that temperature record still does not support the other output being true. + + + **L457** Repeated observed activation is compatible with selected-on and budget 0. + + + **L458** The same repeated records are also compatible with budget 3. + + + **L459** A single activation record does not support the option’s actual objective-and-budget consequence. + + + **L460** Repeating activation records does not repair that lack of consequence support. + + + **L461** The announcement-based value procedure also fails for that actual option and constraint. + + + **L462** Record the observation’s actual true value and both temperature-compatible output alternatives; leave the unsupported output claims to refute. + + + **L463** Keep both budget-0 and budget-3 action-compatible worlds and the established announcement-procedure failure; leave affordability support claims to refute. + + + **L464** Assume a single temperature observation supports the independently represented second output being true. + + + **L465** Apply purported one-record output support to (true,false), whose temperature observation is true but whose other output claim is false. + + + **L466** Apply purported one-record output support to (true,false), whose temperature observation is true but whose other output claim is false. + + + **L467** The same (true,false) counterworld remains compatible with repeated temperature records, defeating repeated-data output support. + + + **L468** Assume a single action observation supports the adopted option’s benefit-and-budget consequence. + + + **L469** A single observed activation is compatible with budget 0; purported consequence support there would force the impossible cost constraint. + + + **L470** A single observed activation is compatible with budget 0; purported consequence support there would force the impossible cost constraint. + + + **L471** Repeating activation records retains the same zero-budget counterworld, so it still does not support the actual affordability consequence. + + + **L472** Document the intended scope of selfAssertionNotReason. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines empty-reason and nonempty-but-budget-irrelevant self-assertion failures, with a joint adoption witness for the latter. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L473** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L474** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L475** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L476** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L477** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L478** State the checked result selfAssertionNotReason. Combines empty-reason and nonempty-but-budget-irrelevant self-assertion failures, with a joint adoption witness for the latter. + + + **L479** The missing-reason position can be actually adopted yet fail its recorded procedure. + + + **L480** The stronger announcement example has nonempty reasons and actual adoption at budget 0. + + + **L481** Its actual consequence and its procedure still fail because the same adopted option exceeds budget. + + + **L482** Retain an actual joint adoption witness, excluding an empty-starting-domain explanation of this failure. + + + **L483** Prove unsupportedPosition.commitment true by reduction; a supposed ValueProcedure contradicts its empty reason list through its nonemptiness requirement. + + + **L484** Reuse the nonempty actual announcement reasons and adoption equality from announcementNotBudgetReason. + + + **L485** Also reuse failure of the same zero-budget consequence and of the entire announcement procedure. + + + **L486** Retain announcementHasJointAdoption so this failure is not explained by an empty or inconsistent starting domain. + + + **L487** Document the intended scope of valueWithoutSelfProof. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhibits a coherent reasoned position not derivable from empty assumptions, and rejects opposite-option, inconsistent-start and impossible-adoption variants. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L488** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L489** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L490** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L491** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L492** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L493** State the checked result valueWithoutSelfProof. Exhibits a coherent reasoned position not derivable from empty assumptions, and rejects opposite-option, inconsistent-start and impossible-adoption variants. + + + **L494** Require the switch position’s actual starting theory to have a model. + + + **L495** Deny derivation of its adopted commitment from the empty Boolean theory. + + + **L496** The opposite position has a joint witness but fails consequence assessment. + + + **L497** Also reject contradictory starting and impossible adoption variants, distinguishing non-self-derived from inconsistent starts. + + + **L498** Combine the actual switch procedure, world true as its starting model, and non-entailment of the adopted claim from emptyTheory. + + + **L499** Add rejection of the inhabited opposite option and the separate contradictory-start and impossible-adoption variants. + + + **L500** Document the intended scope of BenefitCostWorld. The corresponding declaration concerns: Stores a selected Boolean option together with variable benefit and cost values. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L501** Introduce the type abbreviation BenefitCostWorld. Stores a selected Boolean option together with variable benefit and cost values. + + + **L502** Define measuredOutcome. For true, returns the world's benefit/cost pair; false has outcome zero/zero. + + + **L503** The on option reads the world’s actual benefit/cost pair; the off option yields (0,0). + + + **L504** Define benefitReason. Requires the same option's measured benefit to equal four. + + + **L505** The benefit reason requires the actual option’s measured benefit to equal 4. + + + **L506** Define costReason. Requires that option's measured cost to be at most three. + + + **L507** The cost reason requires the same option’s measured cost to be at most 3. + + + **L508** Document the intended scope of jointReasonPosition. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses two separate option-specific benefit and cost reasons jointly for the adopted option's objective and budget. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L509** Define jointReasonPosition. Uses two separate option-specific benefit and cost reasons jointly for the adopted option's objective and budget. + + + **L510** Use Boolean options for on/off. + + + **L511** Represent each outcome as actual benefit and cost in a natural-number pair. + + + **L512** Adopt the on option explicitly; adoption itself is not derived from arithmetic. + + + **L513** Read selection from the world’s first coordinate, separately from measured benefit and cost. + + + **L514** Use measuredOutcome so the assessed option’s actual benefit and cost come from this world. + + + **L515** Adopt the objective that actual benefit strictly exceeds actual cost. + + + **L516** Require this option’s measured cost to be at most 3. + + + **L517** Assume the selected option is on, without assuming benefit or cost conclusions. + + + **L518** List benefitReason and costReason together; the procedure will use their conjunction. + + + **L519** Use an unrestricted world scope in this example; starting assumptions and reason content still constrain the procedure. + + + **L520** Identify an actual measured cost above 3 as relevant criticism. + + + **L521** Record the nonempty response to reassess this option when its actual cost exceeds budget. + + + **L522** Document the intended scope of jointReasonProcedure. The corresponding declaration concerns: Builds a joint witness at benefit four/cost three and combines both reasons to prove cost below benefit and within budget. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L523** State the checked result jointReasonProcedure. Builds a joint witness at benefit four/cost three and combines both reasons to prove cost below benefit and within budget. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L524** Separate the joint-reason position’s nonempty reasons, joint witness, conjunction-based consequence and criticism response. + + + **L525** Use selected-on with benefit 4 and cost 3 as the common starting/limit/adoption witness. + + + **L526** Take any of the two reasons at the actual (true,(4,3)) witness, then split membership to check each distinct reason. + + + **L527** Expose the actual two-element reason list: benefitReason and costReason. + + + **L528** Split reason membership into the benefit reason or the remaining singleton cost reason. + + + **L529** Substitute the benefit reason and check that the witness’s measured benefit is exactly 4. + + + **L530** Identify the remaining reason with costReason and substitute it. + + + **L531** Identify the remaining reason with costReason and substitute it. + + + **L532** Check the witness’s cost bound 3 ≤ 3 by reflexivity of the natural-number order. + + + **L533** For an arbitrary admitted world, assume all active reasons together rather than requiring either reason alone to suffice. + + + **L534** Extract the actual benefitReason from the reason conjunction at this world and adopted option. + + + **L535** Extract costReason from the same conjunction at the same world and option. + + + **L536** Unfold benefitReason: the adopted on option’s measured benefit equals 4. + + + **L537** Unfold costReason: that same option’s measured cost is at most 3. + + + **L538** Retain the actual cost constraint and leave only the strict benefit-over-cost objective. + + + **L539** Rewrite the measured benefit to 4 and check that it exceeds 3. + + + **L540** Compose cost ≤ 3 with 3 < benefit to establish cost < benefit using both reasons. + + + **L541** For a world within limits where criticism is relevant, construct the required response about this option’s excessive cost. + + + **L542** Provide the explicit nonempty response about reassessing the option when its cost exceeds the budget; this records a response, not its persuasive adequacy. + + + **L543** Document the intended scope of JointReasonsExample. The corresponding declaration concerns: States that the joint procedure passes while either reason alone can hold at a world failing the consequence. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L544** Define JointReasonsExample. States that the joint procedure passes while either reason alone can hold at a world failing the consequence. + + + **L545** Require the two-reason position to satisfy its complete ValueProcedure. + + + **L546** Fix a benefit-only counterworld (true,(4,5)) satisfying the same starting assumptions and limits. + + + **L547** At that world, actual adoption and the benefit reason both hold. + + + **L548** Deny the assessed consequence there, because its actual cost is too high. + + + **L549** Fix a cost-only counterworld (true,(0,3)) under the same starting assumptions and limits. + + + **L550** At this world, actual adoption and the cost reason hold. + + + **L551** Deny its assessed consequence because zero benefit does not exceed cost 3. + + + **L552** State the checked result jointReasonsExample. Uses benefit four/cost five and benefit zero/cost three as counterexamples to individual-reason sufficiency. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L553** Begin the combined example with the already checked two-reason procedure. + + + **L554** Supply the benefit-only counterworld with benefit 4 and cost 5, satisfying the same starting, limit and adoption conditions. + + + **L555** Supply the cost-only counterworld with benefit 0 and cost 3 under the same conditions. + + + **L556** The benefit-only world violates the cost constraint 5 ≤ 3; natural-number arithmetic closes the contradiction. + + + **L557** The cost-only world cannot satisfy the strict objective 3 < 0; arithmetic closes this counterexample. + + + **L558** Document the intended scope of heterogeneousReasons. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines empirical, inferential and value examples with a genuine two-reason combination that neither reason alone establishes. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L559** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L560** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L561** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L562** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L563** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L564** State the checked result heterogeneousReasons. Combines empirical, inferential and value examples with a genuine two-reason combination that neither reason alone establishes. + + + **L565** Include the actually discharged empirical switch facet. + + + **L566** Include an inferential facet whose satisfiable true-world premise entails the same true-world claim. + + + **L567** Include the actual switch value procedure and the two-joint-reasons example in this registered theorem. + + + **L568** Combine the checked empirical facet, an inhabited inferential singleton, the value procedure and the joint-reason counterexamples. + + + **L569** For the inferential facet, its singleton premise directly yields the same true-world claim at any model. + + + **L571** Document the intended scope of zeroRecord. The corresponding declaration concerns: Records only a function's Boolean output at natural-number input zero. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L572** Define zeroRecord. Records only a function's Boolean output at natural-number input zero. + + + **L573** Define localGenerator. Produces a function returning true exactly at its natural-number seed. + + + **L574** Document the intended scope of allTrue. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires a Boolean-valued function to return true at every natural number. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L575** Define allTrue. Requires a Boolean-valued function to return true at every natural number. + + + **L576** State the checked result zeroCompatible. Proves one zero-input record constrains exactly the function's value at zero. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L577** Prove both directions between matching zeroRecord and the actual function returning true at input 0. + + + **L578** Apply record compatibility to the sole named test to recover its actual observed equality. + + + **L579** Conversely, singleton membership identifies any listed record with this test, whose equality is the supplied observation premise. + + + **L580** Document the intended scope of GeneratingProcess. The corresponding declaration concerns: Stores producer identity, the actual earlier predicate and the seed used by its revision algorithm. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L581** Declare the data interface GeneratingProcess. Stores producer identity, the actual earlier predicate and the seed used by its revision algorithm. + + + **L582** Store the actual generating process owner identifier. + + + **L583** Store the prior Boolean-valued function before this process generates its revision. + + + **L584** Store the seed input used by this process’s actual local generator. + + + **L585** Document the intended scope of GeneratingProcess.outputRevision. The corresponding declaration concerns: Preserves prior successes and adds the seed-selected input through the actual local generator. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L586** Define GeneratingProcess.outputRevision. Preserves prior successes and adds the seed-selected input through the actual local generator. + + + **L587** The revised function preserves each true prior output or adds truth at the actual generated seed input. + + + **L588** Document the intended scope of ProducedRevision. The corresponding declaration concerns: Stores producer plus exact before and after predicate objects. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L589** Declare the data interface ProducedRevision. Stores producer plus exact before and after predicate objects. + + + **L590** Identify which owner produced this concrete revision object. + + + **L591** Store the actual before-function of the revision. + + + **L592** Store the actual after-function of the revision. + + + **L593** Document the intended scope of GeneratingProcess.produce. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs this process's own revision with its owner and actual prior/output functions. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L594** Define GeneratingProcess.produce. Constructs this process's own revision with its owner and actual prior/output functions. + + + **L595** Construct the revision directly from this process’s owner, prior function and computed output revision. + + + **L596** Define sampleGeneratingProcess. Uses owner seventeen, an always-false prior predicate and seed zero. + + + **L597** Document the intended scope of OwnedRevisionExample. The corresponding declaration concerns: Binds self-origin and exact before/after functions to a real zero-input change whose global claim lacks support. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L598** Define OwnedRevisionExample. Binds self-origin and exact before/after functions to a real zero-input change whose global claim lacks support. + + + **L599** Bind the revision’s producer identifier to the actual generating process owner. + + + **L600** Bind its before-function to this process’s actual prior function. + + + **L601** Bind its after-function to this process’s actual outputRevision. + + + **L602** Require actual change at input 0 from false before to true after. + + + **L603** Retain an actual false output at input 1 after that revision. + + + **L604** The actual produced after-function matches the input-0 observation. + + + **L605** That record still does not support the all-input truth claim. + + + **L606** Document the intended scope of ownedRevisionExample. The corresponding declaration concerns: Computes ownership/object links and uses the produced function's failure at one to refute universal support. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L607** State the checked result ownedRevisionExample. Computes ownership/object links and uses the produced function's failure at one to refute universal support. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L608** Check producer identity, prior/output revision relationships and actual sample values by computation; retain zero-record compatibility and leave universal support to refute. + + + **L609** Assume zeroRecord supports allTrue, to refute it using this owner’s actual produced revision. + + + **L610** Apply purported support to this owner’s actual produced after-function at input 1, where its revision still returns false. + + + **L611** Eliminate the resulting false=true equality; the actual revision is an evidence-compatible counterexample. + + + **L612** Document the intended scope of selfOriginDoesNotSupport. The corresponding declaration concerns: Retains the local observation countermodel and adds an actual owned before/after revision with the same unsupported global claim. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L613** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L614** Register source unit organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L615** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L616** State the checked result selfOriginDoesNotSupport. Retains the local observation countermodel and adds an actual owned before/after revision with the same unsupported global claim. + + + **L617** Compute localGenerator 0 as true at 0 and false at 1. + + + **L618** Require this generated function to match the same input-0 record. + + + **L619** State failure of all-input support and include the concrete owner/prior/revision relationship example. + + + **L620** Compute the generated function’s values at 0 and 1, give its zero-record compatibility, and include the owned revision relationship example. + + + **L621** Assume the local zero observation entails true output at every input of every compatible function. + + + **L622** Instantiate alleged universal support with localGenerator 0 and then input 1; compatibility at 0 did not constrain this failing input. + + + **L623** Eliminate the resulting false=true equality; the actual revision is an evidence-compatible counterexample. + + + **L624** Document the intended scope of localNotUniversal. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhibits both a universally true function and a zero-only true function compatible with the same observation, with an explicit outside input; therefore the observation does not support universal truth. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L625** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L626** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L627** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L628** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L629** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L630** State the checked result localNotUniversal. Exhibits both a universally true function and a zero-only true function compatible with the same observation, with an explicit outside input; therefore the observation does not support universal truth. + + + **L631** Require at least one natural-number input outside the observed singleton scope. + + + **L632** The constant-true function matches the zero observation. + + + **L633** The local generator also matches that same observation. + + + **L634** The first function is universally true while the second is not. + + + **L635** Therefore the shared observation does not support universal truth. + + + **L636** Provide an input outside the observed scope and show both the constant-true function and local generator satisfy the same zero observation. + + + **L637** The constant function is universally true; retain the known support counterexample and leave the local generator’s universal claim to refute. + + + **L638** Evaluate any proposed all-input truth of the local generator at 1, where its actual result is false. + + + **L639** Document the intended scope of hiddenDifference. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows the two functions agree on the domain restricted to zero and disagree at one; local agreement does not establish global equality. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L640** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L641** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L642** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L643** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L644** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L645** State the checked result hiddenDifference. Shows the two functions agree on the domain restricted to zero and disagree at one; local agreement does not establish global equality. + + + **L646** State equality of both functions only for inputs satisfying n=0. + + + **L647** State their concrete output inequality at input 1. + + + **L648** Separate agreement on the input-0 scope from the concrete output difference at input 1. + + + **L649** Substitute n=0 from the scope premise; both functions then compute to true. + + + **L650** Document the intended scope of singleObservation. The corresponding declaration concerns: A single zero-input observation is nonvacuously compatible and supports its local result but does not support the all-input claim. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L651** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L652** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L653** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L654** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L655** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L656** State the checked result singleObservation. A single zero-input observation is nonvacuously compatible and supports its local result but does not support the all-input claim. + + + **L657** Require an actual function compatible with the single observation, preventing empty evidence semantics. + + + **L658** That single record supports its actual input-0 claim. + + + **L659** It does not support the stronger all-input claim. + + + **L660** Compute the record count as one and provide localGenerator 0 as an actual compatible witness. + + + **L661** Extract the supported input-0 fact directly from compatibility and reuse the established failure of allTrue support. + + + **L662** Document the intended scope of arithmeticFacet. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines an inferential facet with assumption n=2 and conclusion n+1=3. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L663** Define arithmeticFacet. Defines an inferential facet with assumption n=2 and conclusion n+1=3. + + + **L664** Define usesObservation. Returns true only for empirical facet tags; this is a classification test, not an analysis of computational executability. + + + **L665** Classify an empirical facet as using observation because it carries actual test records. + + + **L666** Classify inferential and value facets as not using observation in this represented method classifier. + + + **L667** Document the intended scope of noUniversalChain. The corresponding declaration concerns: Discharges the arithmetic implication with a model n=2 while its observation tag is false. This is an example of nonempirical discharge, not a universal account of knowledge. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L668** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L669** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L670** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L671** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L672** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L673** State the checked result noUniversalChain. Discharges the arithmetic implication with a model n=2 while its observation tag is false. This is an example of nonempirical discharge, not a universal account of knowledge. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L674** Provide n=2 as the inferential theory’s nonempty witness and note that its facet constructor uses no observation. + + + **L675** Take any natural-number world n satisfying the arithmetic facet’s actual premise theory. + + + **L676** Extract n=2 from the actual singleton premise, rather than assuming the desired successor conclusion. + + + **L677** Expose the arithmetic conclusion n+1=3 as the remaining goal. + + + **L678** Rewrite n to 2 using the premise; the required arithmetic equality reduces by computation. + + + **L679** Document the intended scope of Trial. The corresponding declaration concerns: Stores setting, actual outcome and recorded outcome as independent natural-number fields, with no measurement mechanism. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L680** Declare the data interface Trial. Stores setting, actual outcome and recorded outcome as independent natural-number fields, with no measurement mechanism. + + + **L681** Store the trial’s setting separately from its outcomes. + + + **L682** Store the trial’s actual outcome, whether accurately recorded or not. + + + **L683** Store the separately recorded outcome to allow accuracy comparisons. + + + **L684** Document the intended scope of Verified. The corresponding declaration concerns: Verification means exact equality of the two supplied outcome fields. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L685** Define Verified. Verification means exact equality of the two supplied outcome fields. + + + **L686** Define Reproduced. Reproduction means only equality of two setting fields; it does not require matching outcomes or histories. + + + **L687** Define Bounded. The bound property is actualOutcome≤2, a fixed threshold rather than a general stability theory. + + + **L688** Document the intended scope of variableOutcomesStableBound. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhibits matching settings with different actual outcomes that both satisfy the fixed upper bound. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L689** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L690** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L691** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L692** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L693** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L694** State the checked result variableOutcomesStableBound. Exhibits matching settings with different actual outcomes that both satisfy the fixed upper bound. + + + **L695** Fix the first trial at setting 0 with actual and recorded outcome 1. + + + **L696** Fix the second trial at the same setting with actual and recorded outcome 2. + + + **L697** Require the two explicitly fixed trials to share settings, differ in actual outcomes and both satisfy actualOutcome ≤ 2. + + + **L698** Evaluate the two same-setting trials: actual outcomes 1 and 2 differ, but each satisfies actualOutcome ≤ 2. + + + **L699** Document the intended scope of verificationReproductionStability. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses explicit numeric trials to separate recorded/actual agreement, equal settings, and the fixed outcome bound. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L700** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L701** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L702** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L703** Register source unit organon.grounds.scope#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L704** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L705** State the checked result verificationReproductionStability. Uses explicit numeric trials to separate recorded/actual agreement, equal settings, and the fixed outcome bound. + + + **L706** Require two accurately recorded trials whose settings nevertheless differ. + + + **L707** Require repeated settings alongside an inaccurate second record and an actual result exceeding the bound. + + + **L708** Require preserved bounds even though one recorded outcome is inaccurate. + + + **L709** Compute each concrete trial predicate separately, exhibiting changed settings, inaccurate recording and failure or preservation of the bound without conflating them. + + + **L710** Document the intended scope of Program. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines a tiny program language with doubling and natural-number constants only. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L711** Declare the alternatives Program. Defines a tiny program language with doubling and natural-number constants only. + + + **L712** Provide syntax for the explanation program that doubles its actual input. + + + **L713** Provide syntax for a constant-output explanation program carrying its returned natural number. + + + **L714** Define Program.eval. Defines the executable meaning of the two program constructors. + + + **L715** Evaluate the doubleInput explanation program at n by actual addition n+n. + + + **L716** Evaluate a constant program by returning its stored value, independently of the input. + + + **L717** Document the intended scope of Process. The corresponding declaration concerns: A process consists of an arbitrary natural-number function and an optional tiny-language explanation program. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L718** Declare the data interface Process. A process consists of an arbitrary natural-number function and an optional tiny-language explanation program. + + + **L719** Store the same process’s actual output function over natural-number inputs. + + + **L720** Store the process’s optional supplied explanation program, separately from its output function. + + + **L721** Document the intended scope of OutputContract. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires the output function to double every natural-number input. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L722** Define OutputContract. Requires the output function to double every natural-number input. + + + **L723** Document the intended scope of ExplanationContract. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires an attached program whose evaluated outputs equal the process output on every input; this is extensional agreement, not causal or human explanatory adequacy. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L724** Define ExplanationContract. Requires an attached program whose evaluated outputs equal the process output on every input; this is extensional agreement, not causal or human explanatory adequacy. + + + **L725** Require an actually supplied program whose evaluation equals this process’s output at every natural input. + + + **L726** Document the intended scope of outputOnlyProcess. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs the correct doubling function without any attached explanation program. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L727** Define outputOnlyProcess. Constructs the correct doubling function without any attached explanation program. + + + **L728** Define explainedProcess. Constructs the same output function with the doubling program attached. + + + **L729** Document the intended scope of processScope. The corresponding declaration concerns: Restricts modeled candidates to the exact assessed process, without restricting the contract's input quantifier. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L730** Define processScope. Restricts modeled candidates to the exact assessed process, without restricting the contract's input quantifier. + + + **L731** Restrict theory models by the actual equality candidate=assessed, not by assuming the desired contract. + + + **L732** Document the intended scope of processContractFacet. The corresponding declaration concerns: Builds an inferential contract facet under the exact assessed-process identity assumption. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L733** Define processContractFacet. Builds an inferential contract facet under the exact assessed-process identity assumption. + + + **L734** Build an inferential facet with that exact object-identity scope and the supplied contract conclusion. + + + **L735** Document the intended scope of processScopeModels. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves that modeling the identity scope is exactly equality to the assessed process. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L736** State the checked result processScopeModels. Proves that modeling the identity scope is exactly equality to the assessed process. + + + **L737** State that modeling this scope is exactly equality to the assessed process. + + + **L738** Instantiate modelsSingleton with equality to the actual assessed Process, proving exactly which candidates satisfy processScope. + + + **L739** Document the intended scope of processContractDischarged. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses a supplied proof of the actual process contract and scope equality to discharge the corresponding inferential facet. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L740** State the checked result processContractDischarged. Uses a supplied proof of the actual process contract and scope equality to discharge the corresponding inferential facet. + + + **L741** Conclude discharge for that same object’s contract facet using the explicit contract-proof premise. + + + **L742** Use the assessed process itself as a model of its identity scope; leave semantic entailment of its contract. + + + **L743** Take a candidate and proof hc that it lies in the actual assessed process’s identity scope. + + + **L744** From the scope model hc, recover that the candidate is exactly the assessed process. + + + **L745** Substitute that process identity so the contract goal is about the actual assessed object. + + + **L746** Use the explicit premise proof of this object’s contract; the generic helper does not create contract correctness without that premise. + + + **L747** Document the intended scope of ProcessGrounds. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires canonical Grounds for this exact process/contract facet and its singleton applicability. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L748** Define ProcessGrounds. Requires canonical Grounds for this exact process/contract facet and its singleton applicability. + + + **L749** Require Grounds for the supplied contract using canonical articulation and the exact assessed-process facet as applicable. + + + **L750** The listed evidence package contains precisely that same process-contract facet. + + + **L751** State the checked result processGrounds. Constructs matching contract Grounds from an actual proof for that same assessed process. + + + **L752** Conclude these same-object ProcessGrounds from the explicit proof of the contract at the assessed process. + + + **L753** Apply the contract-discharge helper to the explicit proof for this same assessed process. + + + **L754** Separate nonempty facets, exact applicability coverage and each facet’s claim/articulation/discharge obligations. + + + **L755** The applicability assumption identifies the facet with the one prescribed facet, which belongs to the singleton list. + + + **L756** Singleton membership identifies the current facet with the prescribed one; substitute it to check its exact claim and grounds. + + + **L757** Assemble the same contract claim, nonempty canonical articulation, semantic connection to the object scope and the established discharge. + + + **L758** Document the intended scope of outputCorrectByEvaluation. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves all-input doubling directly from the concrete output function, not an assumed success flag. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L759** State the checked result outputCorrectByEvaluation. Proves all-input doubling directly from the concrete output function, not an assumed success flag. The supplied proof term uses the displayed constructed witnesses or earlier lemmas, rather than adding an axiom. + + + **L760** Document the intended scope of outputOnlyNoExplanation. The corresponding declaration concerns: Rejects an attached explanation witness because the same process stores none. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L761** State the checked result outputOnlyNoExplanation. Rejects an attached explanation witness because the same process stores none. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L762** Any explanation contract would supply a program whose some value equals the process’s actual none response; distinct option constructors make that impossible. + + + **L763** Document the intended scope of FullProcessContract. The corresponding declaration concerns: Conjoins output correctness with an attached output-faithful explanation for the same process. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L764** Define FullProcessContract. Conjoins output correctness with an attached output-faithful explanation for the same process. + + + **L765** Document the intended scope of OutputContractEvidence. The corresponding declaration concerns: Combines grounded output and a nonempty exact-process scope whose model refutes the stronger full contract. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L766** Define OutputContractEvidence. Combines grounded output and a nonempty exact-process scope whose model refutes the stronger full contract. + + + **L767** Require grounded output correctness for the actual output-only process. + + + **L768** Keep that process itself as an inhabitant of the exact assessment scope. + + + **L769** Deny that this same scope entails the stronger output-plus-explanation contract. + + + **L770** Document the intended scope of outputContractEvidence. The corresponding declaration concerns: Builds output Grounds by evaluation and uses the missing explanation at the same process to refute full-contract entailment. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L771** State the checked result outputContractEvidence. Builds output Grounds by evaluation and uses the missing explanation at the same process to refute full-contract entailment. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L772** Supply the actual output contract’s grounds and the process’s own scope witness, then refute the stronger contract under that very scope. + + + **L773** Assume that this exact process scope entails the stronger output-plus-explanation contract. + + + **L774** Instantiate alleged full-contract entailment at outputOnlyProcess itself; its explanation component contradicts the proven absent explanation. + + + **L775** Document the intended scope of ScopedApplicationEvidence. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires both different application contracts to have Grounds and nonempty exact-process scopes. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L776** Define ScopedApplicationEvidence. Requires both different application contracts to have Grounds and nonempty exact-process scopes. + + + **L777** Include grounded output correctness for outputOnlyProcess. + + + **L778** Include grounded output and explanation together for explainedProcess. + + + **L779** Make the first scope’s exact identity with outputOnlyProcess explicit for every candidate. + + + **L780** Likewise make the second scope’s exact identity with explainedProcess explicit. + + + **L781** Require both actual process-identity theories to be satisfiable. + + + **L782** Document the intended scope of scopedApplicationEvidence. The corresponding declaration concerns: Supplies actual all-input output proofs and the doubling explanation program for the stronger contract. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L783** State the checked result scopedApplicationEvidence. Supplies actual all-input output proofs and the doubling explanation program for the stronger contract. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L784** Construct output-only grounds by evaluation and reserve the explained process’s stronger contract proof. + + + **L785** Provide exact process-identity scope equivalences and each process itself as a nonempty scope witness. + + + **L786** Provide exact process-identity scope equivalences and each process itself as a nonempty scope witness. + + + **L787** For explainedProcess, prove every doubled output by reflexivity and supply doubleInput as an actual provided, extensionally faithful explanation program. + + + **L788** Document the intended scope of outputNotExplanation. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves output correctness with no attached explanation and includes the corresponding same-object Grounds/countermodel evidence. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L789** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L790** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L791** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L792** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L793** State the checked result outputNotExplanation. Proves output correctness with no attached explanation and includes the corresponding same-object Grounds/countermodel evidence. + + + **L794** Retain absence of this process’s explanation contract together with its scoped output evidence. + + + **L795** Combine actual output correctness, the same process’s absence of an explanation, and its matched scoped output evidence. + + + **L796** Document the intended scope of applicationContractsDiffer. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows output-only evidence fails the stronger contract, while the explained process satisfies both; both applications carry their own Grounds. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L797** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L798** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L799** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L800** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L801** State the checked result applicationContractsDiffer. Shows output-only evidence fails the stronger contract, while the explained process satisfies both; both applications carry their own Grounds. + + + **L802** The output-only process meets output correctness but fails the combined output-and-explanation contract. + + + **L803** The explained process meets both actual contracts. + + + **L804** Include the explicit scoped grounds and nonempty witnesses for both application contracts. + + + **L805** For outputOnlyProcess, supply actual output correctness and refute any joint contract by projecting its impossible explanation component. + + + **L806** For explainedProcess, compute all doubled outputs, supply faithful doubleInput syntax, and include both contracts’ matched scoped grounds. + + + **L807** Document the intended scope of ExternalCertificate. The corresponding declaration concerns: Binds output-correctness proof to the exact process and distinct assessor/assessed identifiers; it is a mathematical role model, not authenticated real provenance. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L808** Declare the data interface ExternalCertificate. Binds output-correctness proof to the exact process and distinct assessor/assessed identifiers; it is a mathematical role model, not authenticated real provenance. + + + **L809** Store the external assessor’s identifier. + + + **L810** Store the assessed participant’s identifier; the certificate type already fixes the assessed Process. + + + **L811** Require distinct participant identifiers as an explicit certificate field. + + + **L812** Require a proof of this very process’s doubled output for every input; a generic certificate assumes this field, while the concrete certificate constructs it. + + + **L813** Document the intended scope of externalOutputCertificate. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs assessor forty-two's proof for assessed object seven by actual output evaluation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L814** Define externalOutputCertificate. Constructs assessor forty-two's proof for assessed object seven by actual output evaluation. + + + **L815** Construct participants 42 and 7, compute their inequality, and prove every doubled output by reflexivity of the actual program. + + + **L816** Document the intended scope of externalAssessment. The corresponding declaration concerns: Uses a distinct-participant certificate to supply matching output Grounds while the assessed process still returns no explanation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L817** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L818** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L819** Register source unit organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L820** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L821** State the checked result externalAssessment. Uses a distinct-participant certificate to supply matching output Grounds while the assessed process still returns no explanation. + + + **L822** Require an actual external certificate indexed by outputOnlyProcess. + + + **L823** Identify its assessor as 42 and assessed participant as 7. + + + **L824** Require their distinction and actual output correctness of the same process. + + + **L825** Also retain matched ProcessGrounds for that same output contract. + + + **L826** Still deny an internal explanation contract for that actual process. + + + **L827** Use the actual externalOutputCertificate with fixed participants 42 and 7 and its proved participant distinction. + + + **L828** Take universal output correctness from that concrete certificate, whose proof was constructed from the actual program. + + + **L829** Build matching ProcessGrounds for the very outputOnlyProcess using that same concrete output proof. + + + **L830** Retain outputOnlyNoExplanation, so the external certificate does not assert an internal explanation exists. + + + **L831** Document the intended scope of arithmeticArticulation. The corresponding declaration concerns: Names the canonical articulation of the arithmetic inferential facet. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L832** Define arithmeticArticulation. Names the canonical articulation of the arithmetic inferential facet. + + + **L833** Document the intended scope of nonExecutableAssessment. The corresponding declaration concerns: Constructs Grounds for the arithmetic conditional facet and distinguishes its nonempirical tag from a discharged empirical switch facet. The tag does not establish noncomputability. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L834** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L835** Register source unit organon.relationships.terms#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L836** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L837** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L838** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L839** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L840** State the checked result nonExecutableAssessment. Constructs Grounds for the arithmetic conditional facet and distinguishes its nonempirical tag from a discharged empirical switch facet. The tag does not establish noncomputability. + + + **L841** Require matched canonical Grounds for n+1=3 using precisely arithmeticFacet. + + + **L842** Specify that this inferential facet uses no observation. + + + **L843** At the same time, include an actually discharged empirical facet that does use observation. + + + **L844** Build the arithmetic claim’s nonempty, applicability-covered Grounds, retain its no-observation classification, and include the valid observed switch facet. + + + **L845** Singleton membership fixes the assessed facet to arithmeticFacet, so its specific assumptions and conclusion must be checked. + + + **L846** Use the same arithmetic facet’s proven discharge with canonical nonempty articulation and its exact semantic connection. + + + **L848** Close namespace CoreReader.Evidence; this adds no proof or premise. + + +### `leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean` + + +```lean +import CoreReader.Agency +import CoreReader.Choice + +namespace CoreReader.Integration +open CoreReader.Logic CoreReader.Evidence CoreReader.Agency CoreReader.Choice + +/- Canonical articulation preserves the actual assessment contents of each facet. -/ +theorem canonicalGrounds {W : Type} (claim : Claim W) (facets : List (Facet W)) + (hne : facets ≠ []) (checked : ∀ f ∈ facets, f.claim = claim ∧ FacetDischarged f) : + Grounds claim canonicalArticulation (fun f => f ∈ facets) facets := by + exact ⟨hne, fun _ h => h, fun f hf => + ⟨(checked f hf).1, canonicalArticulated f (checked f hf).2, + canonicalFacetArticulated f, (checked f hf).2⟩⟩ + +theorem canonicalGroundsForSingleton {W : Type} (f : Facet W) (checked : FacetDischarged f) : + Grounds f.claim canonicalArticulation (fun g => g = f) [f] := by + refine ⟨by simp, (by intro g hg; cases hg; simp), ?_⟩ + intro g hg + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hg + subst g + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated f checked, canonicalFacetArticulated f, checked⟩ + +/- A mode selects whether a system applies or waives the modeled governance rule. -/ +inductive Mode | apply | waive + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- The four hypotheses vary algorithm and governance independently for the same assessed system. -/ +abbrev World := Candidate × Mode + +def actual : World := (.identity, .apply) + +/- A method's form and its possible executable realizations belong to one object. -/ +structure Method where + form : Form + realize : World → Implementation + +/- System fields identify the owner, its method, its current principle form, policy and work. -/ +structure System where + owner : Nat + method : Method + principleForm : Form + governance : World → Mode + requirements : Requirements + +def policyFor : Mode → Policy + | .apply => openPolicy + | .waive => neutralPolicy + +def workFor (owner : Nat) : Mode → List WorkRecord + | .apply => completeOwnWork owner + | .waive => [] + +def System.policy (s : System) (w : World) : Policy := policyFor (s.governance w) +def System.rules (s : System) (_w : World) : List Principle := ownRules s.owner +def System.work (s : System) (w : World) : List WorkRecord := workFor s.owner (s.governance w) + +def actualSystem : System where + owner := 0 + method := ⟨⟨.method, 0⟩, fun w => implementation w.1⟩ + principleForm := ⟨.principle, 0⟩ + governance := Prod.snd + requirements := identityRequirements + +def systemCapability (s : System) : Claim World := + fun w => ∀ n, s.requirements.inputs n → (s.method.realize w).run n = s.requirements.expected n + +def systemBudget (s : System) : Claim World := + fun w => (s.method.realize w).cost ≤ s.requirements.budget + +def systemObservation (s : System) : Record World := + ⟨fun w => decide ((s.method.realize w).run 0 = s.requirements.expected 0), true⟩ + +def systemHeld (s : System) : Theory World := + union (singleton (systemCapability s)) (singleton (systemBudget s)) + +inductive Question | correctOutput | affordable + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def systemContext (s : System) : Context World Question := + ⟨singleton (Compatible [systemObservation s]), + (fun q => match q with | .correctOutput => systemCapability s | .affordable => systemBudget s), + fun w => (s.method.realize w).domain 0 ∧ w.2 = .apply⟩ + +abbrev capability := systemCapability actualSystem +abbrev observation := systemObservation actualSystem +abbrev held := systemHeld actualSystem +abbrev context := systemContext actualSystem + +/- The output observation identifies the algorithm, without identifying its independently varied governance mode. -/ +theorem observationIdentifies (w : World) : Compatible [observation] w ↔ w.1 = .identity := by + rcases w with ⟨candidate, mode⟩ + cases candidate <;> simp [Compatible, observation, systemObservation, actualSystem, + implementation, identityRequirements, identityImpl, successorImpl] + +theorem capabilityActual : capability actual := fun _ _ => rfl + +theorem observedCapability : Supports [observation] capability := by + intro w hw + have hid := (observationIdentifies w).1 hw + rcases w with ⟨candidate, mode⟩ + change candidate = .identity at hid + subst candidate + exact fun _ _ => rfl + +def capabilityFacet : Facet World := .empirical [observation] (fun _ => True) capability (fun _ => True) + +theorem capabilityFacetChecked : FacetDischarged capabilityFacet := by + exact ⟨⟨actual, (observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl, trivial⟩, + (fun w hw _ => observedCapability w hw), fun _ _ => trivial⟩ + +theorem capabilityGrounds : Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet] := + canonicalGroundsForSingleton capabilityFacet capabilityFacetChecked + +theorem actualAdmissible : Admissible held context actual := by + refine ⟨(modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 capabilityActual, + (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by change 1 ≤ 1; decide)⟩, + (modelsSingleton _ _).2 ((observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl), trivial, rfl⟩ + +theorem jointConsistent : Consistent held context := + consequenceConsistency held context ⟨actual, actualAdmissible⟩ + +/- The current method/principle forms, judgments, rules and own work are read from this very system and world. -/ +def Charter (s : System) (w : World) : Prop := + Generative (s.policy w) ∧ Consistent (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) ∧ + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (s.policy w).current s.method.form ∧ (s.policy w).current s.principleForm + +theorem charterChecked : Charter actualSystem actual := + ⟨⟨Or.inl rfl, fun _ _ => trivial⟩, jointConsistent, completeOwnWork_reflexive 0, rfl, rfl⟩ + +/- Revision adds a supported input-specific assertion about the same system's realized method. -/ +def revisedHeld : Theory World := union held + (singleton (fun w => (actualSystem.method.realize w).run 0 = actualSystem.requirements.expected 0)) + +def initialSnapshot : Snapshot World Question := ⟨held, context, 0⟩ +def revisedSnapshot : Snapshot World Question := ⟨revisedHeld, context, 1⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem revisionKeepsConsistency : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ Consistent revisedHeld context ∧ + TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot true ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot false := by + refine ⟨charterChecked, consequenceConsistency revisedHeld context ⟨actual, + (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨actualAdmissible.1, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + actualAdmissible.2⟩, (fun _ => rfl), ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h (Or.inr (by decide)) + cases bad + +/- A claim about this system's method is assessed as its owner's system claim. -/ +def OwnCapabilityDuty (s : System) (w : World) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + Performed (s.work w) (.system s.owner) .assessment ∧ + Grounds (systemCapability s) canonicalArticulation (fun f => f ∈ facets) facets + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem ownCapabilityGrounded : + OwnCapabilityDuty actualSystem actual [capabilityFacet] ∧ capability actual := by + refine ⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, capabilityActual⟩ + · exact ownAssessmentPerformed 0 (.system 0) (by simp [ownSubjects]) + · exact canonicalGrounds capability [capabilityFacet] (by simp) + (by intro f hf; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hf; cases hf; exact ⟨rfl, capabilityFacetChecked⟩) + +/- This cost observation is true of both algorithms but does not discriminate their output behavior. -/ +def costAllowanceRecord : Record World := + ⟨fun w => decide ((actualSystem.method.realize w).cost ≤ 2), true⟩ + +def unsupportedCapabilityFacet : Facet World := + .empirical [costAllowanceRecord] (fun _ => True) capability (fun _ => True) + +theorem costCompatibleWithFailure : Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] (.successor, .apply) := by + intro r hr + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst r + rfl + +theorem costDoesNotSupportOutput : ¬ Supports [costAllowanceRecord] capability := by + intro h + have bad := h (.successor, .apply) costCompatibleWithFailure 0 trivial + cases bad + +theorem unsupportedGrounds : ¬ Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] := by + intro h + have discharged := (h.2.2 unsupportedCapabilityFacet (by simp)).2.2.2 + exact costDoesNotSupportOutput (fun w hw => discharged.2.1 w hw trivial) + +/- Five separately adopted requirements govern distinct operations; the mode does not give them priority over one another. -/ +inductive Commitment | generation | consistency | reflexivity | grounds | choice + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A Grounds policy governs arbitrary claims, articulations and applicable facets, rather than only one capability claim. -/ +def groundsPermission (mode : Mode) (claim : Claim World) (a : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + match mode with + | .apply => Grounds claim a applicable facets + | .waive => True + +def GroundsProvision (mode : Mode) : Prop := + ∀ claim a applicable facets, groundsPermission mode claim a applicable facets → + Grounds claim a applicable facets + +theorem groundsProvisionMeaning (mode : Mode) : GroundsProvision mode ↔ mode = .apply := by + cases mode with + | apply => exact ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ _ _ _ _ h => h⟩ + | waive => + constructor + · intro h + exact False.elim (unsupportedGrounds (h capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] trivial)) + · intro h; cases h + +/- The consistency policy checks a whole same-context theory, not isolated judgments. -/ +def consistencyPermission (mode : Mode) (t : Theory World) (c : Context World Question) : Prop := + match mode with | .apply => Consistent t c | .waive => True + +def conflictingHeld : Theory World := union (singleton capability) (singleton (fun w => ¬ capability w)) + +theorem conflictConsequences : + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput true ∧ + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput false := by + exact ⟨fun w hw => hw.1 capability (Or.inl rfl), + fun w hw => hw.1 (fun w => ¬ capability w) (Or.inr rfl)⟩ + +theorem conflictingHeldInconsistent : ¬ Consistent conflictingHeld context := + conflictRequiresChange conflictingHeld context .correctOutput conflictConsequences.1 conflictConsequences.2 + +/- The selection policy applies the actual output/budget and relevant-reason conditions to every implementation. -/ +def choicePermission (mode : Mode) (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Prop := + match mode with | .apply => JustifiedChoice req i reasons | .waive => True + +/- The following consequences are computed from distinct rule applications; they are not interchangeable support flags. -/ +def proposedOperation : Mode → Operation + | .apply => .successor + | .waive => .copy + +def selfSamples : Mode → List Nat + | .apply => [0, 1] + | .waive => [1] + +noncomputable def conflictDecision (mode : Mode) : Bool := + @decide (consistencyPermission mode conflictingHeld context) (Classical.propDecidable _) + +noncomputable def groundsDecision (mode : Mode) (facet : Facet World) : Bool := + @decide (groundsPermission mode facet.claim canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = facet) [facet]) + (Classical.propDecidable _) + +noncomputable def choiceDecision (mode : Mode) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Bool := + @decide (choicePermission mode identityRequirements i reasons) (Classical.propDecidable _) + +theorem decisionsApply : conflictDecision .apply = false ∧ + groundsDecision .apply unsupportedCapabilityFacet = false ∧ + groundsDecision .apply capabilityFacet = true ∧ + choiceDecision .apply cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = false ∧ + choiceDecision .apply identityImpl objectiveReason = true := by + classical + simp only [conflictDecision, groundsDecision, choiceDecision, consistencyPermission, + groundsPermission, choicePermission] + exact ⟨decide_eq_false conflictingHeldInconsistent, + decide_eq_false unsupportedGrounds, decide_eq_true capabilityGrounds, + decide_eq_false eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient.2, decide_eq_true identityJustified⟩ + +theorem decisionsWaive : conflictDecision .waive = true ∧ + groundsDecision .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet = true ∧ + choiceDecision .waive cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = true := by + exact ⟨@decide_eq_true (consistencyPermission .waive conflictingHeld context) + (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial, + @decide_eq_true (groundsPermission .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet.claim canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet]) (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial, + @decide_eq_true (choicePermission .waive identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity]) + (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial⟩ + +/- Each application supplies its own outcome type, adopted objective, constraints and actual option-indexed reasons. -/ +noncomputable def commitmentPositionFor (c : Commitment) (chosenMode : Mode) : ValuePosition World := + match c with + | .generation => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Operation, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => proposedOperation mode, + objective := fun op => op.run 0 ≠ Operation.copy.run 0, + constraints := fun _ mode => Generative (policyFor mode), + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ mode => (proposedOperation mode).run 0 = 1 ∧ Operation.copy.run 0 = 0], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => ¬ Expanded baseState inflatedState, + response := fun _ => some "Pursuing expansion does not guarantee it; assess the actual before and after capabilities separately" } + | .consistency => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => conflictDecision mode, + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => consistencyPermission mode held context, + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput true ∧ + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput false], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => ¬ Entails (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) (fun w => w = true), + response := fun _ => some "Consistency alone does not establish sufficient support; assess the claim with its grounds as well" } + | .reflexivity => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := List Nat, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => selfSamples mode, + objective := fun samples => ∃ n ∈ samples, ownArithmeticPrinciple n = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => Reflexive 0 (ownRules 0) (workFor 0 mode), + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 1 = true], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => selfTest [1] = true ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false, + response := fun _ => some "A passing self-test does not certify the principle; retain the relevant counterexample and its scope" } + | .grounds => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => groundsDecision mode unsupportedCapabilityFacet, + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => groundsPermission mode capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet], + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] (.successor, .apply) ∧ + ¬ capability (.successor, .apply)], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess, + response := fun _ => some "Grounds allows an external output assessment without requiring this process to provide an internal explanation" } + | .choice => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => choiceDecision mode cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity], + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => choicePermission mode identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason, + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => cheapSuccessor.run 0 = 1 ∧ identityRequirements.expected 0 = 0 ∧ + cheapSuccessor.cost ≤ identityRequirements.budget], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ identityImpl.established = true, + response := fun _ => some "An existing conventional method remains eligible when actual output and budget reasons justify it" } + +noncomputable def commitmentPosition (c : Commitment) : ValuePosition World := commitmentPositionFor c .apply + +/- The fact used as a reason has content before evaluating the adopted rule's consequence. -/ +theorem positionReasons (c : Commitment) : + ∀ r ∈ (commitmentPosition c).reasons, r actual (commitmentPosition c).adopted := by + cases c <;> intro r hr <;> dsimp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor] at hr ⊢ <;> + rcases List.mem_singleton.mp hr with rfl + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact conflictConsequences + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · refine ⟨costCompatibleWithFailure, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 0 trivial + cases bad + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl, by decide⟩ + +/- Each adopted rule has its stated consequence in this explicitly defined application; this is not ultimate value justification. -/ +theorem positionConsequence (c : Commitment) (w : World) : (commitmentPosition c).consequence w := by + cases c <;> dsimp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor, ValuePosition.consequence] + · exact ⟨by decide, ⟨Or.inl rfl, fun _ _ => trivial⟩⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.1, jointConsistent⟩ + · exact ⟨⟨0, by simp [selfSamples], rfl⟩, completeOwnWork_reflexive 0⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.2.1, capabilityGrounds⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.2.2.2.1, identityJustified⟩ + +theorem positionProcedure (c : Commitment) : ValueProcedure (commitmentPosition c) := by + refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · cases c <;> simp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor] + · refine ⟨actual, ?_, ?_, ?_, positionReasons c⟩ + · cases c <;> exact (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl + · cases c <;> rfl + · cases c <;> rfl + · intro w _ _ _ + exact positionConsequence c w + · intro w _ _ + cases c <;> exact ⟨_, rfl, by decide⟩ + +/- Criticism is instantiated within the adopted position's actual limit rather than made vacuous. -/ +theorem criticismWithinScope (c : Commitment) : + (commitmentPosition c).limits actual ∧ (commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism actual := by + constructor + · cases c <;> rfl + · cases c + · simp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + · exact consistentIncomplete.2.1 + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact ⟨outputNotExplanation.1, outputNotExplanation.2.1⟩ + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + +/- Waiving the rule changes the actual computed outcome or an explicit adopted constraint; old reasons cannot certify it unchanged. -/ +theorem oppositeConsequenceFails (c : Commitment) (w : World) : + ¬ (commitmentPositionFor c .waive).consequence w := by + cases c <;> intro h + · exact permissionNotValuation.2.2 h.2 + · have bad : conflictDecision .waive = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.1] at bad + cases bad + · obtain ⟨n, hn, hf⟩ := h.1 + change n ∈ [1] at hn + have he : n = 1 := List.mem_singleton.mp hn + subst n + cases hf + · have bad : groundsDecision .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.2.1] at bad + cases bad + · have bad : choiceDecision .waive cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.2.2] at bad + cases bad + +theorem oppositeProcedureRejected (c : Commitment) : ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor c .waive) := by + intro h + obtain ⟨w, hs, hl, _, hr⟩ := h.2.1 + exact oppositeConsequenceFails c w (h.2.2.1 w hs hl hr) + +/- Each statement names adoption of a particular rule; its defined policy gives that option its meaning. -/ +noncomputable def commitmentClaim (c : Commitment) : Claim World := (commitmentPosition c).commitment + +noncomputable def commitmentFacet (c : Commitment) : Facet World := .value (commitmentPosition c) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem reasonsBelongToCommitments (c : Commitment) : + Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c] ∧ + JointAdoption (commitmentPosition c) ∧ + (commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor c .waive) := by + exact ⟨canonicalGroundsForSingleton (commitmentFacet c) (positionProcedure c), + (positionProcedure c).2.1, (criticismWithinScope c).2, oppositeProcedureRejected c⟩ + +/- This claim concerns the Grounds rule for arbitrary claim/facet packages, not a single capability duty. -/ +theorem groundsCommitmentIsProvision : commitmentClaim .grounds = (fun w => GroundsProvision w.2) := by + funext w + apply propext + exact (groundsProvisionMeaning w.2).symm + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem groundsSelfAssessment : + Grounds (fun w => GroundsProvision w.2) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet .grounds) [commitmentFacet .grounds] ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).limits actual ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor .grounds .waive) := by + rw [← groundsCommitmentIsProvision] + exact ⟨(reasonsBelongToCommitments .grounds).1, + (criticismWithinScope .grounds).1, (criticismWithinScope .grounds).2, + oppositeProcedureRejected .grounds⟩ + +/- This existing principle form implements the same system's choice rule on two actual proposals. +Input 0 names the identity proposal; input 1 names the cheap successor proposal. -/ +structure PhilosophyMethod where + form : Form + mode : Mode + +def currentPhilosophy (s : System) (w : World) : PhilosophyMethod := + ⟨s.principleForm, s.governance w⟩ + +noncomputable def PhilosophyMethod.review (p : PhilosophyMethod) (input : Nat) : Nat := + if input = 0 then + if choiceDecision p.mode identityImpl objectiveReason then 1 else 0 + else if choiceDecision p.mode cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] then 1 else 0 + +noncomputable def PhilosophyMethod.implementation (p : PhilosophyMethod) : Implementation where + name := "Current philosophy's proposal review" + conventional := true + established := true + run := p.review + cost := 1 + domain n := n = 0 ∨ n = 1 + explanation := p.review + trace n := [n, p.review n] + +def proposalRequirements : Requirements where + inputs n := n = 0 ∨ n = 1 + expected n := if n = 0 then 1 else 0 + budget := 1 + values _ := True + +theorem currentReviewCorrect : ∀ n, proposalRequirements.inputs n → + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review n = proposalRequirements.expected n := by + intro n hn + rcases hn with rfl | rfl <;> + simp [PhilosophyMethod.review, currentPhilosophy, actualSystem, actual, + proposalRequirements, decisionsApply.2.2.2.1, decisionsApply.2.2.2.2] + +/- Status alone fails for this actual principle method; its demonstrated proposal decisions give a relevant reason. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged : + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).form = actualSystem.principleForm ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).mode = actualSystem.governance actual ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.status .standing] ∧ + JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.method .output] ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 0 = 1 ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 1 = 0 := by + refine ⟨rfl, rfl, statusOnlyFails _ _ _, ?_, currentReviewCorrect 0 (Or.inl rfl), + currentReviewCorrect 1 (Or.inr rfl)⟩ + exact ⟨⟨currentReviewCorrect, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, + .method .output, by simp, trivial, currentReviewCorrect⟩ + +/- Applications choose their contract and requirements; the resulting claim is about this system's actual method. -/ +def applicationClaim (s : System) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) : Claim World := + fun w => contract req (s.method.realize w) + +def ApplicationDuties (s : System) (w : World) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + Grounds (applicationClaim s req contract) articulations applicable facets + +/- These are consequences of an explicitly adopted duty, not a proof that arbitrary applications fulfill it. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem applicationRetainsDuties (s : System) (w : World) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) + (h : ApplicationDuties s w req contract articulations applicable facets) : + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (∀ f, applicable f → f ∈ facets) ∧ + (∀ f ∈ facets, f.claim = applicationClaim s req contract ∧ + Articulated (articulations f) ∧ FacetArticulated (articulations f) f ∧ FacetDischarged f) := + ⟨h.1, h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2⟩ + +def outputContract (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Prop := + ∀ n, req.inputs n → i.run n = req.expected n + +def successorRequirements : Requirements := + { identityRequirements with expected := fun n => n + 1 } + +/- Holding the system and observation fixed while changing the actual objective changes the capability claim. -/ +def changedObjectiveFacet : Facet World := + .empirical [observation] (fun _ => True) + (applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract) (fun _ => True) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem applicationVariation : + ApplicationDuties actualSystem actual identityRequirements outputContract + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet] ∧ + ¬ applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds (applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract) + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = changedObjectiveFacet) [changedObjectiveFacet] := by + refine ⟨⟨completeOwnWork_reflexive 0, capabilityGrounds⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h 0 trivial + cases bad + · intro h + have discharged := (h.2.2 changedObjectiveFacet (by simp)).2.2.2 + have bad := discharged.2.1 actual ((observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl) trivial 0 trivial + cases bad + +/- The very system satisfies the charter while its true cost evidence fails to establish its output capability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem charterNotGrounds : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ + Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] := by + exact ⟨charterChecked, (by intro r hr; cases List.mem_singleton.mp hr; rfl), unsupportedGrounds⟩ + +/- A single inhabited system/context carries the charter, its own actual claim and support, +contentful principle work, and separately reasoned governance commitments. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness +organon.preamble#p1 sha256 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097 +organon.preamble#p2 sha256 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097 +organon.charter.overview#p2 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.charter.overview#p3 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem jointWitness : + ∃ s : System, ∃ w : World, + Admissible (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) w ∧ Charter s w ∧ + OwnCapabilityDuty s w [capabilityFacet] ∧ systemCapability s w ∧ + JustifiedChoice s.requirements (s.method.realize w) objectiveReason ∧ + (∀ c : Commitment, Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c]) ∧ + s = actualSystem ∧ w = actual := by + exact ⟨actualSystem, actual, actualAdmissible, charterChecked, + ownCapabilityGrounded.1, capabilityActual, identityJustified, + fun c => (reasonsBelongToCommitments c).1, rfl, rfl⟩ + +end CoreReader.Integration +``` + + + + **L1** Imports CoreReader.Agency and its dependencies into this module. + + + **L2** Imports CoreReader.Choice and its dependencies into this module. + + + **L4** Opens namespace CoreReader.Integration; file boundaries do not change declaration identity. + + + **L5** Makes the listed namespaces available for unqualified references. + + + **L7** Documents the following definition or result: Builds Grounds from a nonempty list of discharged facets all targeting one claim, using canonical articulations and list membership itself as applicability. + + + **L8** Builds Grounds from a nonempty list of discharged facets all targeting one claim, using canonical articulations and list membership itself as applicability. + + + **L9** Assumes a nonempty facet list, with each facet targeting claim and already discharged. + + + **L10** Builds Grounds using each facet's own constructed articulation and list membership as the applicability predicate. + + + **L11** Supplies nonemptiness and tautological membership coverage, then checks each listed facet. + + + **L12** For each facet, uses checked to establish the same claim and derive a nonempty articulation from its discharge. + + + **L13** Adds that articulation's exact content correspondence and the supplied discharge proof. + + + **L15** Builds Grounds for one discharged facet with applicability exactly equality to that facet. + + + **L16** For a single discharged facet, makes exactly that facet applicable to its own claim. + + + **L17** Proves the singleton is nonempty and every facet equal to f occurs in it; leaves per-facet content checks. + + + **L18** Takes any facet g known to belong to the singleton list [f]. + + + **L19** Singleton membership turns hg into the equality g=f. + + + **L20** Replaces g by the same discharged facet f. + + + **L21** Uses identical claim, constructed articulability, exact facet-content match and checked discharge to finish its Grounds fields. + + + **L23** Documents the following definition or result: Separates applying the modeled standards from waiving them; the two modes drive actual policy decisions. + + + **L24** Separates applying the modeled standards from waiving them; the two modes drive actual policy decisions. + + + **L25** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L27** Documents the following definition or result: A world pairs one of two candidate implementations with one of two governance modes; it is a closed four-world model. + + + **L28** A world pairs one of two candidate implementations with one of two governance modes; it is a closed four-world model. + + + **L30** Chooses identity implementation under applying governance as the concrete actual world. + + + **L32** Documents the following definition or result: Binds a revisable form identity to a world-dependent implementation. + + + **L33** Binds a method form kind/version to its world-dependent implementation; this structure alone does not prove the form is revisable. + + + **L34** Stores the form kind and version of this method. + + + **L35** Assigns an actual implementation to every candidate/governance world for this same method. + + + **L37** Documents the following definition or result: Binds owner, method, principle form, governance selection and application requirements. + + + **L38** Binds owner, method, principle form, governance selection and application requirements. + + + **L39** Identifies the owner whose principles and work are used for this system. + + + **L40** Stores the system's method form together with its world-dependent implementation. + + + **L41** Stores the current form of the system's own principle. + + + **L42** Selects whether this system applies or waives governance in each world. + + + **L43** Fixes the actual input, output, budget and value requirements used to assess this system's implementation. + + + **L45** Applying governance selects the open policy; waiving selects the policy without expansion valuation. + + + **L46** Applying governance selects openPolicy, which values expansion and permits revision. + + + **L47** Waiving governance selects neutralPolicy, which lacks the required expansion valuation. + + + **L49** Applying governance supplies content-checked own-work records; waiving supplies none. + + + **L50** Applying governance gives this owner the complete contentful work log. + + + **L51** Waiving governance gives the same owner an empty work log. + + + **L53** Uses this same system's governance choice to select its policy. + + + **L54** Uses the registered generation/assessment rules for this system's owner. + + + **L55** Uses this owner's governance mode to select the actual work-record list. + + + **L57** Constructs owner zero with version-zero method/principle forms, candidate-dependent implementation, world-selected governance and identity requirements. + + + **L58** Assigns owner zero to the shared actual system. + + + **L59** Uses a version-zero method form whose realization is selected by the world's candidate component. + + + **L60** Sets this system's current principle form to principle version zero. + + + **L61** Reads governance from the world's second component, independently of the implementation candidate. + + + **L62** Assesses the same method against identityRequirements. + + + **L64** For this system's requested inputs, requires its realized method to match its own expected output. + + + **L65** Claims that this system's realized method meets its specified output on every required input. + + + **L67** Checks the same realized implementation's cost against the system's budget. + + + **L68** Claims that the same realized method's cost fits this system's own budget. + + + **L70** Records whether the system's actual implementation meets its expected output at input zero. + + + **L71** Records true for the test that this same method's output at zero equals its required output there. + + + **L73** Holds this same system's capability and budget claims together. + + + **L74** The system simultaneously holds its actual output-capability claim and its budget claim. + + + **L76** Defines the output-correctness and affordability questions used by the context. + + + **L77** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L79** Uses the same system's observation as assumption and its capability/budget as meanings; scope requires domain membership at zero and applying governance. + + + **L80** The context assumes compatibility with this system's actual zero-input observation. + + + **L81** Interprets correctOutput as this system's capability and affordable as its budget compliance. + + + **L82** Restricts admissible scope to implementations whose domain includes zero and worlds with governance applied. + + + **L84** Abbreviates the actual system's parameterized output capability claim. + + + **L85** Abbreviates the actual system's input-zero observation record. + + + **L86** Abbreviates the actual system's simultaneously held capability/budget theory. + + + **L87** Abbreviates the actual system's question/assumption/scope context. + + + **L89** Documents the following definition or result: Computes that the zero observation identifies the identity candidate while leaving governance mode unconstrained. + + + **L90** Computes that the zero observation identifies the identity candidate while leaving governance mode unconstrained. + + + **L91** Separates the candidate algorithm from the independently varied governance mode. + + + **L92** Checks each of the two actual candidates against the observation's true zero-output test. + + + **L93** Identity returns required zero while successor returns one, so only identity matches, regardless of governance. + + + **L95** Proves the actual identity implementation meets every requested identity output by reduction. + + + **L97** Uses candidate identification and known identity behavior to obtain universal requested-input capability within the closed model. + + + **L98** Takes an arbitrary world compatible with the same observation. + + + **L99** Uses observationIdentifies to infer that this world's algorithm candidate is identity. + + + **L100** Separates the world's algorithm and governance components for substitution. + + + **L101** Restates the inferred identity equality directly on the candidate variable. + + + **L102** Replaces the candidate algorithm with identity while retaining its governance mode. + + + **L103** Identity's run equals the required output at every input by definition, proving capability in this world. + + + **L105** Packages the actual observation and capability claim in an empirical facet with unrestricted scope and trivial uncertainty. + + + **L107** Supplies an actual compatible witness, the closed-model support proof and trivial uncertainty. + + + **L108** Supplies actual as a compatible world in the facet's unrestricted scope, avoiding an empty-world discharge. + + + **L109** Uses observedCapability for support in every compatible world; the stated uncertainty condition is trivial. + + + **L111** Builds canonical Grounds for this exact capability facet. + + + **L112** Makes only the actual output capability facet applicable, with its own singleton evidence package. + + + **L113** Applies the singleton Grounds constructor to the already discharged capability facet. + + + **L115** Proves actual identity/apply jointly satisfies capability, budget, observation assumptions and governance/domain scope. + + + **L116** Builds an admissible actual-world witness, first proving both jointly held claims; capability uses capabilityActual. + + + **L117** The held budget claim computes to actual cost 1 within budget 1. + + + **L118** Adds compatibility with the zero observation, domain membership at zero, and actual's apply mode. + + + **L120** Derives consistency from the explicitly established actual admissible world. + + + **L121** Applies semantic consequence consistency using actual and its admissibility proof as the required nonempty witness. + + + **L123** Documents the following definition or result: Conjoins this system's generation policy, contextual consistency, full content-valid reflexivity and current method/principle form membership. + + + **L124** Conjoins this system's generation policy, contextual consistency, full content-valid reflexivity and current method/principle form membership. + + + **L125** The Charter requires this system's actual policy to be Generative and its jointly held judgments contextually consistent. + + + **L126** It also requires full owned-rule reflexivity for this system's actual work log. + + + **L127** Both the method form and principle form must be current under that same policy. + + + **L129** Combines evaluated open-policy facts, actual consistency and the content-validated own-work model. + + + **L130** Combines openPolicy's valuation/revisability, jointConsistent, the complete owned log and both version-zero current forms. + + + **L132** Documents the following definition or result: Adds the system's zero-input output fact to its existing held theory. + + + **L133** Adds the system's zero-input output fact to its existing held theory. + + + **L134** Adds the specific assertion that this same method meets its required output at input zero. + + + **L136** Stores the actual held theory/context with revision identity zero. + + + **L137** Stores the extended held theory with the same context and revision identity one. + + + **L139** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L140** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L141** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L142** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L143** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L144** Keeps the same charter and an admissible model after the added fact, then accepts true and rejects false revision reporting. + + + **L145** The actual system retains its Charter, and adding that supported assertion leaves revisedHeld consistent. + + + **L146** Reporting the identified revision as true satisfies the one-way change-report condition. + + + **L147** Reporting that same revision as false violates the condition. + + + **L148** Keeps charterChecked and proves revised consistency with actual as a concrete admissible witness. + + + **L149** Actual satisfies old held claims plus the newly added zero-input output assertion. + + + **L150** Retains actual's existing context/scope proof and verifies a true report; only rejection of a false report remains. + + + **L151** Assumes the changed snapshots could satisfy TruthfulReport with report=false. + + + **L152** The revision identifiers 0 and 1 differ, so that assumed obligation forces false=true. + + + **L153** Eliminates that impossible Boolean equality, rejecting the concealed revision. + + + **L155** Documents the following definition or result: Requires this system's assessment record and matching Grounds for its own capability claim. + + + **L156** Requires this system's assessment record and matching Grounds for its own capability claim. + + + **L157** OwnCapabilityDuty first requires an actual assessment record targeting this system's owner-identical system subject. + + + **L158** It also requires same-claim Grounds for this system's output capability over all listed applicable facets. + + + **L160** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L161** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L162** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L163** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L164** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L165** Combines the actual content-validated self-assessment record with observation-supported capability Grounds and capability truth. + + + **L166** States that the actual system's own capability duty is fulfilled and its claimed capability actually holds. + + + **L167** Supplies capabilityActual immediately, leaving the system-assessment record and corresponding Grounds. + + + **L168** Uses the complete log's assessment of system zero as the owned-system work witness. + + + **L169** Builds Grounds from the nonempty singleton capability-facet list. + + + **L170** The singleton's only facet has exactly the target claim and the already proved discharge. + + + **L172** Documents the following definition or result: Records cost at most two for the same system implementation; both candidates pass. + + + **L173** Records cost at most two for the same system implementation; both candidates pass. + + + **L174** Records that implementation cost is at most two; both algorithm candidates satisfy this weaker cost observation. + + + **L176** Attempts to support the same output capability from only the permissive cost observation. + + + **L177** Attempts to support output capability using only cost evidence, with no restrictive scope or uncertainty condition. + + + **L179** Computes that successor/apply satisfies the cost observation despite failing identity output. + + + **L180** Takes a record belonging to the singleton cost-observation list. + + + **L181** Singleton membership identifies that record as costAllowanceRecord. + + + **L182** Substitutes the actual cost record for r. + + + **L183** Successor costs two, so the recorded at-most-two observation evaluates true. + + + **L185** Applies alleged support to the compatible successor counterworld and input zero to derive contradiction. + + + **L186** Assumes the cost observation supports output capability in every compatible world. + + + **L187** Applies that assumption to the compatible successor world and input zero, obtaining the false equation 1=0. + + + **L188** Eliminates the impossible output equality, refuting cost-only support. + + + **L190** Extracts the bad facet's support obligation from alleged Grounds and contradicts the cost countermodel. + + + **L191** Tests the singleton package that makes this cost-only capability facet applicable. + + + **L192** Assumes that inadequate singleton package nonetheless satisfies Grounds. + + + **L193** Extracts FacetDischarged for its actual cost-only capability facet from the Grounds premise. + + + **L194** Its support clause would yield cost-only Supports, contradicting costDoesNotSupportOutput. + + + **L196** Documents the following definition or result: Indexes five individual governance commitments, each with separately interpreted reasons and outcomes. + + + **L197** Indexes five individual governance commitments, each with separately interpreted reasons and outcomes. + + + **L198** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L200** Documents the following definition or result: Applying mode permits a claim bundle only when Grounds holds; waiving mode permits every bundle. + + + **L201** Applying mode permits a claim bundle only when Grounds holds; waiving mode permits every bundle. + + + **L202** Accepts an arbitrary applicability predicate and supplied facet package for the same claim/articulations. + + + **L203** Chooses the permission rule according to the governance mode. + + + **L204** Apply mode permits a package only when it actually satisfies Grounds. + + + **L205** Waive mode permits every package without checking Grounds. + + + **L207** States the general requirement that every permitted claim bundle has Grounds, across all claims, articulations, applicable facets and lists. + + + **L208** For every actual claim, articulation family and facet package, provision applies to any package the mode permits. + + + **L209** Every permitted package must satisfy its own corresponding Grounds duties. + + + **L211** Proves applying mode enforces the general provision, while the concrete unsupported cost bundle refutes waiving mode. + + + **L212** Checks the general provision separately for apply and waive modes. + + + **L213** In apply mode permission already is Grounds, so the general provision passes by returning the supplied proof. + + + **L214** For waive mode, the proof must show that unrestricted permission violates the general provision. + + + **L215** Proves both directions of the impossible waive-mode equivalence. + + + **L216** Assumes the general provision holds even though this mode waives checks. + + + **L217** Applies that universal assumption to the actual unsupported capability package, which would contradict unsupportedGrounds. + + + **L218** Supplies its exact singleton applicability and package; waive permission is true, forcing the invalid Grounds result. + + + **L219** The reverse implication starts from waive=apply, an impossible constructor equality. + + + **L221** Documents the following definition or result: Applying mode requires consistency for a proposed theory/context; waiving mode permits it unconditionally. + + + **L222** Applying mode requires consistency for a proposed theory/context; waiving mode permits it unconditionally. + + + **L223** Apply requires whole-theory consistency in context; waive imposes no such constraint. + + + **L225** Combines the actual capability claim with its negation in one theory. + + + **L227** Extracts both signed capability consequences from the simultaneously held contradictory claims. + + + **L228** The conflicting held theory entails positive output correctness under the fixed context. + + + **L229** The same theory and context also entail its negative judgment. + + + **L230** An admissible world's model of conflictingHeld must satisfy its explicitly included capability claim. + + + **L231** That same model must also satisfy the explicitly included negation of capability. + + + **L233** Uses those same-context opposite consequences to refute consistency. + + + **L234** Uses the two opposite same-context consequences to refute consistency of the conflicting held theory. + + + **L236** Documents the following definition or result: Applying governance uses the separate feasible relevant-choice norm; waiving governance accepts every proposed reason list. + + + **L237** Applying governance uses the separate feasible relevant-choice norm; waiving governance accepts every proposed reason list. + + + **L238** Apply enforces actual feasibility and reason relevance through JustifiedChoice; waive allows any selection package. + + + **L240** Documents the following definition or result: Applying mode proposes successor, while waiving proposes the unchanged copy operation. + + + **L241** Applying mode proposes successor, while waiving proposes the unchanged copy operation. + + + **L242** Applying the generation rule proposes successor, whose output can differ from copy. + + + **L243** Waiving that rule proposes the unchanged copy operation. + + + **L245** Applying mode tests zero and one; waiving mode tests only the passing sample one. + + + **L246** Applying reflexive assessment checks both zero and one, including the arithmetic counterexample. + + + **L247** Waiving it checks only one, the sample where the arithmetic principle passes. + + + **L249** Classically decides the consistency-permission proposition for the concrete conflicting theory; it is noncomputable, not a deployed checker. + + + **L250** Uses classical propositional decision to turn the whole conflicting-theory permission into a Boolean; no executable decision algorithm is supplied. + + + **L252** Classically decides whether the chosen mode permits the given exact singleton facet bundle. + + + **L253** Decides permission for this facet's own claim and its exact singleton assessment package. + + + **L254** Supplies classical decidability for that potentially noncomputable Grounds proposition. + + + **L256** Classically decides permission for the specified implementation/reasons under identity requirements. + + + **L257** Classically decides this implementation's permission under fixed identity requirements and its supplied reasons. + + + **L259** Proves applying mode rejects contradiction, unsupported capability and infeasible cheap successor while accepting actual capability and identity choice. + + + **L260** Applying Grounds rejects the cost-only capability package. + + + **L261** Applying Grounds accepts the properly supported output-observation package. + + + **L262** Applying choice rejects cheapSuccessor despite its relevant simplicity reason, because its output is infeasible. + + + **L263** Applying choice accepts identity with its actual output reason. + + + **L264** Enables the classical decidability instances used in these Boolean permission definitions. + + + **L265** Unfolds the three Boolean decisions and their apply-mode consistency predicate. + + + **L266** Also unfolds Grounds and choice permission, exposing the actual propositions each Boolean decides. + + + **L267** The proved inconsistency forces conflictDecision apply to false. + + + **L268** The failed cost package decides false, while the discharged observation package decides true. + + + **L269** The infeasible cheap method decides false; the feasible justified identity decides true. + + + **L271** Computes that waiving mode accepts the concrete contradiction, unsupported facet and infeasible choice. + + + **L272** Waive mode accepts even the unsupported cost-only capability package. + + + **L273** It also accepts cheapSuccessor with simplicity alone despite the wrong output. + + + **L274** Starts the waiver calculation with consistencyPermission, which is definitionally True in this mode. + + + **L275** Uses that trivial permission proof to obtain the true Boolean conflict decision. + + + **L276** Next decides waiver permission for the exact unsupported capability facet's claim. + + + **L277** Its singleton applicability/package is unchanged; waiver makes permission True and the decision true. + + + **L278** Finally decides waiver permission for the same cheap method and simplicity-only reasons. + + + **L279** That permission is again trivially True, completing all three waiver decisions. + + + **L281** Documents the following definition or result: For each commitment, interprets governance modes as options with its own operational outcome, objective, constraint, actual reasons and scoped criticism response. + + + **L282** For each commitment, interprets governance modes as options with its own operational outcome, objective, constraint, actual reasons and scoped criticism response. + + + **L283** Chooses a different operational value-position adapter for each of the five commitments. + + + **L284** Constructs the value position for the generation commitment. + + + **L285** Its positions are governance modes, outcomes are operations, and adoption is compared with this same system's selected governance. + + + **L286** Maps a mode to the actual proposed successor-or-copy operation. + + + **L287** The adopted generation objective requires output at zero to differ from copy's zero output. + + + **L288** Also requires the mode's actual policy to satisfy the adopted Generative constraints. + + + **L289** Explicitly assumes the same system has selected chosenMode; this is a starting commitment, not a derived universal fact. + + + **L290** Its option-dependent reason compares the proposed operation's 0→1 behavior with copy's 0→0 behavior. + + + **L291** Limits this generation position to worlds whose implementation candidate is identity. + + + **L292** Keeps actual inventory inflation without expansion as a relevant criticism of the generation commitment. + + + **L293** Responds that orientation does not guarantee progress and before/after capabilities need separate assessment; the stored response is nonempty text. + + + **L294** Constructs the distinct value position for the consistency commitment. + + + **L295** Uses modes as positions and a Boolean conflict-admission decision as outcome, tied to the same selected governance. + + + **L296** Its actual outcome is the mode's decision on the whole conflicting theory. + + + **L297** Requires that decision to reject the conflicting theory. + + + **L298** Simultaneously requires the actual held theory and context to pass the same mode's consistency permission. + + + **L299** States adoption of chosenMode by the same system as this position's explicit starting assumption. + + + **L300** The consistency reason begins with the conflicting theory's positive output-correctness consequence. + + + **L301** It also includes the opposite consequence under exactly the same question and context. + + + **L302** Limits this consistency position to identity-candidate worlds. + + + **L303** Uses the empty Bool theory's failure to entail truth at every world as the live incompleteness criticism. + + + **L304** Responds that consistency alone does not establish sufficient support and the claim's grounds still need assessment. + + + **L305** Constructs the value position for reflexive assessment. + + + **L306** Uses modes as positions and an actual sample-input list as outcome, tied to the same selected governance. + + + **L307** The mode chooses the sample set [0,1] or [1]. + + + **L308** Requires some actually selected sample to expose a false result of the same arithmetic principle. + + + **L309** Also requires full owner-zero rule/work reflexivity for that same mode. + + + **L310** Explicitly adopts chosenMode for this same system as the starting commitment. + + + **L311** The reason identifies actual arithmetic failure at zero and success at one. + + + **L312** Restricts this reflexivity position to identity-candidate worlds. + + + **L313** Retains the passing test at one together with the actual failure at zero as criticism. + + + **L314** Responds that passing a self-test does not certify the principle and the counterexample's scope must be retained. + + + **L315** Constructs the value position for the Grounds provision itself. + + + **L316** Uses modes as positions and a Boolean evidence-package decision as outcome, under the same system's governance. + + + **L317** The actual outcome tests the unsupported cost-only capability facet. + + + **L318** Requires rejection of that unsupported evidence package. + + + **L319** Also requires permission for the actual capability claim with its content-derived articulations. + + + **L320** That positive constraint uses exactly the properly discharged singleton capabilityFacet package. + + + **L321** States this same system's adoption of chosenMode as an explicit starting commitment. + + + **L322** The Grounds reason records that the successor/apply world is compatible with the cost observation. + + + **L323** It pairs that compatibility with actual failure of the claimed output capability in that same world. + + + **L324** Restricts this Grounds position to identity-candidate worlds. + + + **L325** The criticism points to the same process having the output contract without an attached explanation contract. + + + **L326** Responds that external output assessment can supply Grounds without requiring this process to explain its internal generation. + + + **L327** Constructs the separate value position for implementation choice. + + + **L328** Uses modes as positions and a Boolean method-admission decision as outcome, under the same governance selection. + + + **L329** The tested choice is the cheap successor justified only by its simplicity reason. + + + **L330** Requires rejection of that wrong-output choice. + + + **L331** Also requires acceptance of identity under the same requirements with its actual output reason. + + + **L332** Explicitly adopts chosenMode for this system; the value starting point is not proved from neutral facts. + + + **L333** The choice reason contrasts cheapSuccessor's output one with the required output zero on the same input. + + + **L334** Also records that the method fits the budget, so cheapness cannot conceal its output failure. + + + **L335** Limits this choice position to identity-candidate worlds. + + + **L336** Keeps identity's actual conventional and established status as a relevant criticism of excluding existing methods. + + + **L337** Responds that a conventional existing method remains eligible when actual output and budget reasons justify it. + + + **L339** Specializes each individually interpreted position to adopting applying governance. + + + **L341** Documents the following definition or result: Checks every listed commitment-specific reason at the same actual world and adopted mode by concrete counterexamples or computation. + + + **L342** Checks every listed commitment-specific reason at the same actual world and adopted mode by concrete counterexamples or computation. + + + **L343** Every actual listed reason for commitment c must hold at actual for its adopted apply option. + + + **L344** Separates the five commitments and unfolds each actual reason list while fixing a listed reason r. + + + **L345** Each list is a singleton, so the membership premise identifies r with that commitment's concrete reason. + + + **L346** Generation's reason computes successor 0=1 and copy 0=0. + + + **L347** Consistency's reason uses the already proved positive and negative consequences of the same conflicting theory. + + + **L348** Reflexivity's reason computes failure at zero and success at one for the same arithmetic principle. + + + **L349** For Grounds, supplies the successor world's cost compatibility and leaves its capability failure to prove. + + + **L350** Assumes that same successor world nevertheless has the required output capability. + + + **L351** At required input zero, that assumption yields successor's output one equal to required zero. + + + **L352** Eliminates the impossible 1=0 equality, proving the capability failure part of the reason. + + + **L353** Choice's reason computes output one, required zero and the cheap method's within-budget cost. + + + **L355** Documents the following definition or result: Proves each adopted mode has its stated objective and constraint using actual decision and compliance theorems, without asserting ultimate normative validity. + + + **L356** Proves each adopted mode has its stated objective and constraint using actual decision and compliance theorems, without asserting ultimate normative validity. + + + **L357** Unfolds each commitment's consequence into its actual objective and mode-dependent constraint. + + + **L358** Generation's apply option differs from copy at zero and its openPolicy satisfies valuation plus revisability. + + + **L359** Consistency's apply option rejects the conflicting theory while the actual held theory remains consistent. + + + **L360** Reflexivity chooses the actual counterexample zero from [0,1] and supplies full contentful owned-work reflexivity. + + + **L361** Grounds rejects the unsupported cost package while the proper capability package has Grounds. + + + **L362** Choice rejects cheapSuccessor and retains the justified feasible identity implementation. + + + **L364** Builds nonempty reason lists, joint adoption, checked option consequences and nonempty responses for every commitment; reason assumptions are not needed by the already proved consequences. + + + **L365** Splits ValueProcedure into nonempty reasons, joint adoption, the scoped consequence rule and criticism response. + + + **L366** Checks that every commitment's actual reason list contains its singleton reason. + + + **L367** Uses the same actual world for JointAdoption and supplies positionReasons c; remaining goals are starting-theory membership, limits and adoption. + + + **L368** In actual, governance is apply, so the singleton starting theory selecting the adopted mode holds. + + + **L369** For each commitment, actual's identity candidate satisfies its declared limit. + + + **L370** For each commitment, actual's selected governance equals the adopted apply option. + + + **L371** Takes an arbitrary world and the procedure's starting, limit and all-reasons premises for its consequence clause. + + + **L372** Uses positionConsequence, which already proves that apply option's objective and constraints for every world; these premises are not needed here. + + + **L373** For the response clause, takes a world with an in-scope relevant criticism. + + + **L374** Every commitment returns its actual stored nonempty response string, satisfying the response-existence requirement. + + + **L376** Documents the following definition or result: Provides an actual in-scope criticism case for each commitment, avoiding vacuous response obligations in these examples. + + + **L377** Provides an actual in-scope criticism case for each commitment, avoiding vacuous response obligations in these examples. + + + **L378** Requires both that actual is inside this commitment's limits and that its specific criticism really applies there. + + + **L379** Separates the actual-limit check from the actual-criticism check. + + + **L380** Every limit asks for identity, which is actual's candidate by definition. + + + **L381** Checks each commitment's distinct criticism rather than assuming criticism vacuously. + + + **L382** Generation's criticism holds because inflating baseline lists creates no newly understood or constructed operation. + + + **L383** Consistency's criticism uses the empty theory's proved failure to entail the selected Bool claim. + + + **L384** Reflexivity's criticism computes a passing sample at one and failure at zero. + + + **L385** Grounds' criticism combines actual output correctness of outputOnlyProcess with its absent explanation contract. + + + **L386** Choice's criticism holds because identity is actually conventional and established. + + + **L388** Documents the following definition or result: Shows the waiving option fails each unchanged commitment-specific objective or constraint. + + + **L389** Shows the waiving option fails each unchanged commitment-specific objective or constraint. + + + **L390** Claims that every commitment's waive option fails its declared objective or constraint in any world. + + + **L391** Separates the commitments and assumes the corresponding waive consequence, seeking a contradiction. + + + **L392** Generation's consequence would require Generative neutralPolicy, contradicting permissionNotValuation's proved failure. + + + **L393** Consistency's assumed objective says waive must reject the conflicting theory. + + + **L394** But decisionsWaive computes acceptance=true, turning that objective into true=false. + + + **L395** Rejects that impossible Boolean equality for the consistency option. + + + **L396** Reflexivity's assumed objective supplies a selected sample n where the arithmetic principle is false. + + + **L397** Waive mode's selected samples are exactly [1]. + + + **L398** Membership in that singleton forces the supposed failing input n to be one. + + + **L399** Replaces n with one in the alleged failure proof. + + + **L400** The principle actually returns true at one, contradicting its alleged false result. + + + **L401** Grounds' assumed objective says waive rejects the specific unsupported capability package. + + + **L402** decisionsWaive instead says that same package is accepted, yielding true=false. + + + **L403** Rejects the impossible equality, so the waived Grounds consequence fails. + + + **L404** Choice's assumed objective says waive rejects cheapSuccessor with simplicity alone. + + + **L405** decisionsWaive proves that exact selection is accepted, again yielding true=false. + + + **L406** Rejects that equality, completing failure of all five waive consequences. + + + **L408** Combines a hypothetical joint-adoption witness with consequence failure to reject the opposite mode's procedure. + + + **L409** Assumes the opposite waive value position nevertheless satisfies ValueProcedure. + + + **L410** Extracts its JointAdoption witness w, starting-theory proof hs, limit proof hl and all-reasons proof hr. + + + **L411** The assumed procedure's consequence clause applied to that same joint witness produces the waive consequence, which oppositeConsequenceFails c w refutes. + + + **L413** Documents the following definition or result: Extracts each position's adoption claim; all use the same governance selector but have separately assessed consequences and reasons. + + + **L414** Extracts each position's adoption claim; all use the same governance selector but have separately assessed consequences and reasons. + + + **L416** Wraps the specific interpreted commitment position as a value facet. + + + **L418** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L419** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L420** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L421** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L422** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L423** Provides per-commitment Grounds, a real joint adoption, actual relevant criticism and rejection of the opposite policy under the same interpreted objective. + + + **L424** Requires Grounds for the actual adoption claim of commitment c, with articulation built from its facet contents. + + + **L425** Makes exactly commitmentFacet c applicable and supplies only that same facet. + + + **L426** Additionally requires a nonempty jointly admissible adoption witness for that position. + + + **L427** Requires this particular commitment's criticism to actually hold at actual. + + + **L428** Also proves the opposite waive position fails the same value-procedure requirements. + + + **L429** Constructs singleton Grounds using that commitment's checked positionProcedure. + + + **L430** Adds its joint witness, actual criticism and the proved rejection of its opposite position. + + + **L432** Documents the following definition or result: Proves the grounds position's adoption claim is extensionally the general Grounds provision for the selected governance mode. + + + **L433** Proves the grounds position's adoption claim is extensionally the general Grounds provision for the selected governance mode. + + + **L434** To equate the two claims, fixes an arbitrary world w and compares their propositions there. + + + **L435** Uses proposition extensionality: equivalence of the two propositions suffices for their equality. + + + **L436** groundsProvisionMeaning says the general provision holds exactly in apply mode, matching this adoption claim in reverse direction. + + + **L438** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L439** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L440** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L441** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L442** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L443** Applies value Grounds to the general Grounds provision itself, retaining actual scope/criticism and a rejected waiver variant. + + + **L444** Assesses the general GroundsProvision itself, quantified over claim/facet packages, with content-derived articulation. + + + **L445** The applicable value aspect is exactly the grounds commitment's own facet. + + + **L446** Requires actual to satisfy that commitment's declared limit. + + + **L447** Requires its criticism to actually apply at actual as well. + + + **L448** Requires the opposite waived Grounds commitment to fail ValueProcedure. + + + **L449** Rewrites the general provision as the extensionally identical grounds adoption claim. + + + **L450** Reuses the actual Grounds proof for that same grounds commitment. + + + **L451** Supplies the separately checked actual limit and actual relevant criticism. + + + **L452** Supplies the proved failure of the opposite waived Grounds position. + + + **L454** Documents the following definition or result: Stores the current philosophical principle form and its actual governance mode. + + + **L455** Documents the following definition or result: Stores the current philosophical principle form and its actual governance mode. + + + **L456** Stores the current philosophical principle form and its actual governance mode. + + + **L457** Stores the actual principle form this philosophy method implements. + + + **L458** Stores whether this same philosophy method applies or waives its governance checks. + + + **L460** Derives the reviewed philosophy object from this same system's principle form and governance selection. + + + **L461** Builds the philosophy method from this system's own principle form and its governance in w. + + + **L463** Returns approval decisions for the identity proposal at zero and the cheap infeasible proposal otherwise, using this philosophy's actual governance mode. + + + **L464** Input zero identifies the identity-method proposal; every other input follows the cheap-successor proposal branch. + + + **L465** For identity, runs this philosophy method's actual choice policy and returns 1 for accept, 0 for reject. + + + **L466** For other inputs, applies the same policy to cheapSuccessor with simplicity alone, again encoding accept/reject as 1/0. + + + **L468** Exposes that actual philosophical review procedure as an implementation with domain zero/one and matching output/trace proxies. + + + **L469** Names the implementation as the current philosophy's actual proposal-review method. + + + **L470** Marks this proposal-review implementation as conventional. + + + **L471** Also marks the same implementation as established; later proof tests whether that alone justifies priority. + + + **L472** The implementation's actual run is precisely this philosophy method's review function. + + + **L473** Assigns cost one to this review implementation. + + + **L474** Declares only proposal identifiers zero and one within its application domain. + + + **L475** Provides the same review function as the implementation's explanation field. + + + **L476** Records a two-entry trace containing the proposal identifier and its actual review result. + + + **L478** Requires accepting proposal zero and rejecting proposal one within budget one. + + + **L479** The application tests exactly proposal identifiers zero and one. + + + **L480** Requires identity's proposal zero to be accepted as 1 and the other tested proposal to be rejected as 0. + + + **L481** Allows this review method a cost budget of one. + + + **L482** Imposes no additional restriction through the requirements' values predicate in this example. + + + **L484** Computes both requested proposal decisions from applying-governance results. + + + **L485** For each required proposal, the actual system's current philosophy review must equal the application's expected verdict. + + + **L486** Takes a proposal n with proof hn that it is one of the required inputs. + + + **L487** Uses hn to restrict n to the concrete identity or cheap-successor proposal identifier. + + + **L488** Unfolds the same current philosophy method and actual system to expose the real proposal decisions. + + + **L489** Uses decisionsApply to match accepted identity and rejected cheap successor against their required verdicts. + + + **L491** Documents the following definition or result: Binds the implementation to the current principle/governance object, rejects status-only priority and justifies it by its two actual proposal decisions. + + + **L492** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L493** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L494** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L495** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L496** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L497** Binds the implementation to the current principle/governance object, rejects status-only priority and justifies it by its two actual proposal decisions. + + + **L498** Checks this philosophy method's form is exactly the actual system's current principle form. + + + **L499** Checks its governance mode is exactly the same system's mode at actual. + + + **L500** Begins the claim that status alone cannot justify choosing this actual review implementation. + + + **L501** The rejected reason list is exactly [.status .standing] for that same philosophy implementation. + + + **L502** By contrast, asserts this implementation has a justified choice under the actual proposal requirements. + + + **L503** That positive choice uses its actual output reason, not merely its name or established flag. + + + **L504** The same philosophy review actually accepts identity's proposal zero with result one. + + + **L505** It actually rejects cheap successor's proposal one with result zero. + + + **L506** Provides same-form/mode identities, status-only rejection and correct proposal-zero evaluation; leaves positive output-based choice to prove. + + + **L507** Also supplies currentReviewCorrect for required proposal one, proving its actual rejection. + + + **L508** Builds the positive choice's feasibility from both correct proposal outputs and cost 1≤budget 1. + + + **L509** Uses the listed .method .output reason and currentReviewCorrect as its actual relevance witness. + + + **L511** Documents the following definition or result: Applies any supplied application contract and requirements to this system's actual world-dependent method. + + + **L512** Applies any supplied application contract and requirements to this system's actual world-dependent method. + + + **L513** Accepts an arbitrary application contract relating Requirements to the implementation being assessed. + + + **L514** At each world, applies that same contract and requirements to this system's actual method realization. + + + **L516** Conjoins full same-system reflexivity with Grounds for the exact parameterized application claim. + + + **L517** ApplicationDuties keeps the chosen application contract as an explicit parameter. + + + **L518** Also accepts the articulation supplied for each potentially relevant facet. + + + **L519** Keeps the actual applicability predicate separate from the supplied facet list. + + + **L520** Requires full reflexivity of the same system owner's actual rules and work at w. + + + **L521** Requires matching Grounds for the claim produced by this system, these requirements and this contract. + + + **L523** Documents the following definition or result: Projects an explicitly assumed application-compliance interface into reflexivity, applicability coverage and matching discharged facets; it does not invent compliance. + + + **L524** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L525** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L526** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L527** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L528** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L529** Projects an explicitly assumed application-compliance interface into reflexivity, applicability coverage and matching discharged facets; it does not invent compliance. + + + **L530** The theorem retains the arbitrary application contract rather than fixing a single capability definition. + + + **L531** Retains the actual articulation family for that application's facets. + + + **L532** Retains the application's own applicability predicate and supplied facet list. + + + **L533** Crucially assumes ApplicationDuties already holds for these exact objects; the theorem does not create compliance. + + + **L534** The conclusion retains full same-owner rule/work reflexivity from that assumed duty. + + + **L535** It requires every actually applicable facet to occur in the supplied list, regardless of labels. + + + **L536** For every listed facet, its assessed claim must equal this system's actual parameterized application claim. + + + **L537** That same facet must have an articulable, content-matching articulation and actually satisfy its discharge conditions. + + + **L538** Projects h.1 as reflexivity, h.2.2.1 as applicability coverage, and h.2.2.2 as each listed facet's same-claim, articulation and discharge checks. + + + **L540** Requires the implementation to meet the application's expected output on every requested input. + + + **L541** The output contract checks this implementation's actual run against the chosen expected output on every required input. + + + **L543** Changes the same application requirements from identity to successor output while retaining other fields. + + + **L544** Keeps identityRequirements' inputs and other fields but changes expected output to n+1. + + + **L546** Documents the following definition or result: Reuses the old observation while changing the assessed claim to the successor objective, setting up a same-object scope test. + + + **L547** Reuses the old observation while changing the assessed claim to the successor objective, setting up a same-object scope test. + + + **L548** Reuses the old actual observation for an empirical facet with unrestricted scope. + + + **L549** Changes its assessed claim to this same system meeting successorRequirements; the uncertainty predicate remains trivial. + + + **L551** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L552** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L553** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L554** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L555** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L556** In this example, the original identity contract retains its fulfilled duties; the changed successor contract fails for the same actual method, and the specified retained-observation package cannot ground it. + + + **L557** The original identity-output application fulfills ApplicationDuties for the actual system and world. + + + **L558** That positive instance uses the already supported capabilityFacet and its own constructed articulation. + + + **L559** But the same actual system does not meet the changed successor-output contract. + + + **L560** Nor does the changed claim acquire Grounds from the retained observation package. + + + **L561** This failure concerns exactly changedObjectiveFacet's singleton package, not every possible evidence package. + + + **L562** Builds the original duty from full owned reflexivity and capabilityGrounds, then leaves changed behavior and changed evidence failures. + + + **L563** Assumes the actual identity method meets the new successor contract. + + + **L564** At required input zero, this would force actual output zero to equal expected one. + + + **L565** Eliminates the impossible 0=1 equality, refuting the changed actual capability claim. + + + **L566** Assumes the retained observation singleton nevertheless gives Grounds for that changed claim. + + + **L567** Extracts the actual changedObjectiveFacet's discharge from that assumed Grounds package. + + + **L568** Its support rule applied to the compatible actual world and input zero yields the same false output equality 0=1. + + + **L569** Rejects that equality, proving the specified retained-observation package cannot ground the new claim. + + + **L571** Documents the following definition or result: Exhibits this actual charter-compliant system with compatible cost evidence whose specified capability facet is unsupported; other valid grounds can still exist. + + + **L572** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L573** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L574** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L575** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L576** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L577** Exhibits this actual charter-compliant system with compatible cost evidence whose specified capability facet is unsupported; other valid grounds can still exist. + + + **L578** The same actual system satisfies all represented Charter conditions. + + + **L579** Its actual world is compatible with the true at-most-two cost observation. + + + **L580** Nevertheless, that cost evidence does not provide Grounds for its output capability. + + + **L581** The denied Grounds is the particular unsupportedCapabilityFacet singleton, not every possible assessment bundle. + + + **L582** Combines charterChecked, direct compatibility of actual with the cost record, and the already proved unsupportedGrounds counterexample. + + + **L584** Documents the following definition or result: Constructs one shared system/world satisfying actual judgments, full reflexivity, capability evidence, feasible choice and each interpreted commitment's Grounds; it is a bounded model, not universal philosophical correctness. + + + **L585** Documents the following definition or result: Constructs one shared system/world satisfying actual judgments, full reflexivity, capability evidence, feasible choice and each interpreted commitment's Grounds; it is a bounded model, not universal philosophical correctness. + + + **L586** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L587** Records source reference organon.preamble#p1 with content digest 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L588** Records source reference organon.preamble#p2 with content digest 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L589** Records source reference organon.charter.overview#p2 with content digest 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L590** Records source reference organon.charter.overview#p3 with content digest 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L591** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p1 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L592** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p2 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L593** Records source reference organon.relationships.roles#p3 with content digest 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L594** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L595** Constructs one shared system/world satisfying actual judgments, full reflexivity, capability evidence, feasible choice and each interpreted commitment's Grounds; it is a bounded model, not universal philosophical correctness. + + + **L596** Requires an actual system/world pair as the joint witness, so the combined claim is nonempty. + + + **L597** That same pair must be admissible for its jointly held/contextual claims and satisfy its Charter. + + + **L598** It must also have its own capability duty fulfilled by capabilityFacet and possess the claimed capability. + + + **L599** The same realized method must be feasibly chosen under its own requirements using objectiveReason. + + + **L600** For every one of the five commitments, the corresponding actual adoption claim must have Grounds. + + + **L601** Each commitment uses its own exact singleton value facet and corresponding applicability. + + + **L602** Finally identifies the witnesses with actualSystem and actual, preventing unrelated existential substitutions. + + + **L603** Chooses that exact pair and supplies its actual admissibility and checked Charter. + + + **L604** Adds this same system's owned capability duty, actual capability and justified identity choice. + + + **L605** Uses each commitment's existing Grounds proof, then closes the two witness-identity equalities by construction. + + + **L607** Closes the current namespace. + + +### `leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean` + + +```lean +namespace CoreReader.Logic + +/- A claim denotes the worlds in which its content holds. -/ +abbrev Claim (W : Type) := W → Prop +/- A theory is a collection of simultaneously held claims. -/ +abbrev Theory (W : Type) := Claim W → Prop +/- A model satisfies every member of the whole theory. -/ +def Models {W : Type} (t : Theory W) (w : W) : Prop := ∀ p, t p → p w +/- Semantic entailment quantifies over all models. -/ +def Entails {W : Type} (t : Theory W) (p : Claim W) : Prop := ∀ w, Models t w → p w +/- Satisfiability requires an actual witness. -/ +def Satisfiable {W : Type} (t : Theory W) : Prop := ∃ w, Models t w +/- Assumptions, meanings and scope are distinct components; questions remain explicit. -/ +structure Context (W Q : Type) where + assumptions : Theory W + meaning : Q → Claim W + scope : Claim W +/- Admissible worlds satisfy held claims, assumptions and scope jointly. -/ +def Admissible {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (w : W) : Prop := + Models t w ∧ Models c.assumptions w ∧ c.scope w +/- A negative judgment denies the very same question under the same meaning. -/ +def Consequence {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (q : Q) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + ∀ w, Admissible t c w → if positive then c.meaning q w else ¬ c.meaning q w +/- The consistency obligation prohibits both consequences at one comparison basis. -/ +def Consistent {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) : Prop := + ∀ q, ¬ (Consequence t c q true ∧ Consequence t c q false) +/- An inhabited joint interpretation prevents opposite semantic consequences. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency +organon.charter.consistency#p1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem consequenceConsistency {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) + (inhabited : ∃ w, Admissible t c w) : Consistent t c := by + intro q h + obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := inhabited + exact (h.2 w hw) (h.1 w hw) +/- Empty and singleton theories provide concrete semantic contexts. -/ +def emptyTheory {W : Type} : Theory W := fun _ => False +def singleton {W : Type} (p : Claim W) : Theory W := fun q => q = p +def union {W : Type} (a b : Theory W) : Theory W := fun p => a p ∨ b p +theorem modelsSingleton {W : Type} (p : Claim W) (w : W) : Models (singleton p) w ↔ p w := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h p rfl + · intro h q hq; cases hq; exact h +theorem modelsUnion {W : Type} (a b : Theory W) (w : W) : + Models (union a b) w ↔ Models a w ∧ Models b w := by + constructor + · intro h; exact ⟨fun p hp => h p (Or.inl hp), fun p hp => h p (Or.inr hp)⟩ + · rintro ⟨ha,hb⟩ p (hp|hp); exact ha p hp; exact hb p hp +/- The paired world records independent truth values for two questions. -/ +def premiseP : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.1 = true +def premiseRule : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.1 = true → w.2 = true +def premiseNotQ : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.2 ≠ true +def jointTheory : Theory (Bool × Bool) := + union (singleton premiseP) (union (singleton premiseRule) (singleton premiseNotQ)) +/- Each premise has a model, but their joint implication makes the union unsatisfiable. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict +organon.charter.consistency#p1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem jointConflict : + Satisfiable (singleton premiseP) ∧ Satisfiable (singleton premiseRule) ∧ + Satisfiable (singleton premiseNotQ) ∧ ¬ Satisfiable jointTheory := by + refine ⟨⟨(true,true), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨(false,false), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by intro h; cases h)⟩, + ⟨(false,false), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by intro h; cases h)⟩, ?_⟩ + rintro ⟨w, hw⟩ + have hp := hw premiseP (Or.inl rfl) + have hr := hw premiseRule (Or.inr (Or.inl rfl)) + have hn := hw premiseNotQ (Or.inr (Or.inr rfl)) + exact hn (hr hp) +/- A retraction replaces the old singleton, rather than retaining both at the same time. -/ +def revisionSlice (time : Nat) : Theory Bool := + singleton (fun w => w = (time == 0)) +/- The initial and revised slices have models; keeping both would create a conflict. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem revisionCanReverse : + Satisfiable (revisionSlice 0) ∧ Satisfiable (revisionSlice 1) ∧ + ¬ Satisfiable (union (revisionSlice 0) (revisionSlice 1)) := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨false, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + rintro ⟨w, hw⟩ + have hs := (modelsUnion _ _ _).1 hw + have hp := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hs.1 + have hn := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hs.2 + have bad : true = false := hp.symm.trans hn + cases bad +/- This basic question asks whether the represented switch is on. -/ +def onQuestion : Unit → Claim Bool := fun _ w => w = true +def assumptionContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨singleton (fun w => w = b), onQuestion, fun _ => True⟩ +def meaningContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨singleton (fun w => w = true), (fun _ w => w = b), fun _ => True⟩ +def scopeContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨emptyTheory, onQuestion, fun w => w = b⟩ +/- Distinct assumptions, meanings and scopes each admit opposite judgments without same-context conflict. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem contextDifferences : + (Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext false) () false) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (assumptionContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (meaningContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (scopeContext b) w) := by + have empty : ∀ w : Bool, Models emptyTheory w := by intro w p hp; cases hp + refine ⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w h; change w = true; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 h.2.1 + · intro w h hp; have hn := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h.2.1; cases hp.symm.trans hn + · intro w h; change w = true; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 h.2.1 + · intro w h hn; have hp := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h.2.1; cases hp.symm.trans hn + · intro w h; exact h.2.2 + · intro w h hp; cases hp.symm.trans h.2.2 + · intro b; exact ⟨b, empty b, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial⟩ + · intro b; exact ⟨true, empty true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial⟩ + · intro b; exact ⟨b, empty b, empty b, rfl⟩ +/- Snapshots preserve identifiable adopted-form revisions even when semantic content agrees. -/ +structure Snapshot (W Q : Type) where + held : Theory W + context : Context W Q + revisionIdentity : Nat +/- Semantic equivalence compares represented content, not its list ordering. -/ +def SameContent {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) : Prop := + (∀ p, a.held p ↔ b.held p) ∧ + (∀ p, a.context.assumptions p ↔ b.context.assumptions p) ∧ + (∀ q w, a.context.meaning q w ↔ b.context.meaning q w) ∧ + (∀ w, a.context.scope w ↔ b.context.scope w) +/- The reporting norm covers both semantic change and independently identified revisions. -/ +def TruthfulReport {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) : Prop := + (¬ SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) → reported = true +/- A real represented change and compliance entail an acknowledged change. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem semanticChangeMustBeReported {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) + (changed : ¬ SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) + (h : TruthfulReport a b reported) : reported = true := h changed +/- Reordering a two-claim presentation preserves the held theory extension. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem representationOrderIrrelevant {W : Type} (p q : Claim W) : + ∀ r, union (singleton p) (singleton q) r ↔ union (singleton q) (singleton p) r := by + intro r; exact or_comm +def contextSnapshot (c : Context Bool Unit) (revision : Nat := 0) : Snapshot Bool Unit := + ⟨emptyTheory, c, revision⟩ +/- Hiding each kind of contextual change violates the reporting interface; reporting alone supplies no truth guarantee. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem hiddenContextChangeRejected : + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (meaningContext true)) (contextSnapshot (meaningContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true)) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 0) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 1) false ∧ + (TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) true ∧ + ¬ Models (assumptionContext false).assumptions true) := by + have neq : (fun w : Bool => w = true) ≠ (fun w : Bool => w = false) := by + intro h; have k := congrFun h true; have z : true = false := k.mp rfl; cases z + refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; exact neq ((s.2.1 _).mp rfl))) + cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; have z := (s.2.2.1 () true).mp rfl; cases z)) + cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; have z := (s.2.2.2 true).mp rfl; cases z)) + cases bad + · intro h; have bad := h (Or.inr (by decide)); cases bad + · refine ⟨fun _ => rfl, ?_⟩ + intro h; have z := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h; cases z +/- Two nonidentical resource objectives can share a feasible allocation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +-/ +theorem tensionWithoutContradiction : + (∃ budget : Nat, 4 ≤ budget ∧ budget ≤ 6) ∧ + ¬ ((fun n : Nat => 4 ≤ n) = (fun n : Nat => n ≤ 6)) := by + refine ⟨⟨5, by decide, by decide⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h; have k := congrFun h 0; have bad : 4 ≤ 0 := k.mpr (by decide); cases bad +/- Conflicting conclusions cannot be retained under the same consistency obligation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +-/ +theorem conflictRequiresChange {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (q : Q) + (positive : Consequence t c q true) (negative : Consequence t c q false) : + ¬ Consistent t c := fun h => h q ⟨positive,negative⟩ +/- A satisfiable theory can have a false assumption at a specified actual world. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem consistentFalse : Satisfiable (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) ∧ + ¬ Models (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) false := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h; have bad := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h; cases bad +/- The explicitly asked on/off question is undecided by the empty but inhabited theory. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem consistentIncomplete : Satisfiable (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w ≠ true) := by + have empty : ∀ w : Bool, Models emptyTheory w := by intro w p hp; cases hp + refine ⟨⟨true, empty true⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h; have bad := h false (empty false); cases bad + · intro h; exact h true (empty true) rfl +/- A claim can share a model with a theory without following in every model. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem compatibilityNotEntailment : + Satisfiable (union emptyTheory (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true))) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨?_, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩⟩, + consistentIncomplete.2.1⟩ + intro p hp; cases hp + +end CoreReader.Logic +``` + + + + **L1** Open namespace CoreReader.Logic so subsequent declarations receive this module-qualified name. + + + **L3** Document the intended scope of Claim. The corresponding declaration concerns: A claim is a proposition-valued function on a supplied world type W; the world type is not restricted to a real-world interpretation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L4** Introduce the type abbreviation Claim. A claim is a proposition-valued function on a supplied world type W; the world type is not restricted to a real-world interpretation. + + + **L5** Document the intended scope of Theory. The corresponding declaration concerns: A theory is a predicate selecting claims, rather than a finite syntax or executable theory representation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L6** Introduce the type abbreviation Theory. A theory is a predicate selecting claims, rather than a finite syntax or executable theory representation. + + + **L7** Document the intended scope of Models. The corresponding declaration concerns: A world models a theory exactly when every selected claim holds at that world. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L8** Define Models. A world models a theory exactly when every selected claim holds at that world. + + + **L9** Document the intended scope of Entails. The corresponding declaration concerns: Semantic entailment universally quantifies over worlds satisfying the theory. With no model it is vacuous. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L10** Define Entails. Semantic entailment universally quantifies over worlds satisfying the theory. With no model it is vacuous. + + + **L11** Document the intended scope of Satisfiable. The corresponding declaration concerns: Satisfiability requires an actual witness world together with a proof that it models the theory. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L12** Define Satisfiable. Satisfiability requires an actual witness world together with a proof that it models the theory. + + + **L13** Document the intended scope of Context. The corresponding declaration concerns: Packages contextual assumptions, question meanings, and a scope predicate; the interface does not validate these choices. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L14** Declare the data interface Context. Packages contextual assumptions, question meanings, and a scope predicate; the interface does not validate these choices. + + + **L15** Store the actual contextual assumption theory, separately from the held theory. + + + **L16** Interpret each question as a proposition about each world. + + + **L17** Store the predicate selecting the admitted application scope. + + + **L18** Document the intended scope of Admissible. The corresponding declaration concerns: A world is admissible when the held theory, contextual assumptions, and scope all hold simultaneously. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L19** Define Admissible. A world is admissible when the held theory, contextual assumptions, and scope all hold simultaneously. + + + **L20** Require this same world to model both theories and satisfy the contextual scope simultaneously. + + + **L21** Document the intended scope of Consequence. The corresponding declaration concerns: A signed consequence must hold in every admissible world: positive selects the question meaning and negative selects its negation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L22** Define Consequence. A signed consequence must hold in every admissible world: positive selects the question meaning and negative selects its negation. + + + **L23** Quantify over every admissible world; the sign selects either this question’s meaning or its negation. + + + **L24** Document the intended scope of Consistent. The corresponding declaration concerns: Consistency rules out simultaneously entailing a question and its negation for every question in Q. Empty Q makes this condition vacuous. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L25** Define Consistent. Consistency rules out simultaneously entailing a question and its negation for every question in Q. Empty Q makes this condition vacuous. + + + **L26** For every question, prohibit the conjunction of its positive and negative consequences in this same context. + + + **L27** Document the intended scope of consequenceConsistency. The corresponding declaration concerns: Given an admissible witness, proves that no question can have both signed consequences. The witness is an explicit premise. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L28** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L29** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L30** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L31** State the checked result consequenceConsistency. Given an admissible witness, proves that no question can have both signed consequences. The witness is an explicit premise. + + + **L32** Assume an admissible witness for the whole context and conclude its consistency; begin the proof. + + + **L33** Introduce an arbitrary question q and the hypothetical pair h of its positive and negative consequences in the same context. + + + **L34** Extract the common admissible world w and its entire theory/assumptions/scope proof hw from the explicit inhabited premise. + + + **L35** Evaluate both halves of h at the same w and hw; the negative consequence contradicts the positive consequence. + + + **L36** Document the intended scope of emptyTheory. The corresponding declaration concerns: Selects no claims, so every world models this theory. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L37** Define emptyTheory. Selects no claims, so every world models this theory. + + + **L38** Define singleton. Selects exactly the claim equal to p; this uses equality of predicate functions. + + + **L39** Define union. Combines two sets of claims by disjunction of membership. + + + **L40** State the checked result modelsSingleton. Proves that modeling the singleton theory is equivalent to satisfying its sole claim. The following tactic block proves this explicit type. + + + **L41** Split the equivalence between satisfying the singleton theory and satisfying its sole claim into two implications. + + + **L42** Use the assumed singleton model h on p, whose membership follows from reflexive equality. + + + **L43** For any selected claim q, singleton membership identifies q with p; substitute that identity and return the assumed truth h of p. + + + **L44** State the checked result modelsUnion. Proves that modeling the union is equivalent to modeling both constituent theories at the same world. + + + **L45** State that the same world models the theory union exactly when it models both constituent theories. + + + **L46** Prove the model-of-union equivalence in its forward and reverse directions. + + + **L47** Restrict the union model h to each theory by embedding its membership proof into the left or right disjunct. + + + **L48** Unpack both constituent models, split a union membership into its two alternatives, and use the corresponding model on the same claim and world. + + + **L49** Document the intended scope of premiseP. The corresponding declaration concerns: Reads the first Boolean coordinate as true. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L50** Define premiseP. Reads the first Boolean coordinate as true. + + + **L51** Define premiseRule. Makes truth of the first Boolean imply truth of the second. + + + **L52** Define premiseNotQ. Requires the second Boolean not to be true. + + + **L53** Define jointTheory. Combines the first-coordinate fact, the implication, and the negated second-coordinate fact. + + + **L54** Hold P, the rule P implies Q, and not Q together through nested theory unions. + + + **L55** Document the intended scope of jointConflict. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhibits individual models of each of three claims, then proves their conjunction has no model. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L56** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L57** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L58** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L59** State the checked result jointConflict. Exhibits individual models of each of three claims, then proves their conjunction has no model. + + + **L60** The first two conclusions provide separate models for P and its implication rule. + + + **L61** Also require a separate model for not Q, but deny any model of the entire joint theory. + + + **L62** Supply (true,true) as the model of P, using modelsSingleton to turn its first-coordinate equality into the required model proof. + + + **L63** Supply (false,false) for the implication premise: assuming its false first coordinate is true is impossible. + + + **L64** Supply (false,false) for not Q and leave the joint unsatisfiability branch to be proved. + + + **L65** Assume a joint model w with proof hw in order to refute its existence. + + + **L66** Extract the actual first-coordinate fact P from its left membership in the joint theory. + + + **L67** Extract P implies Q from the nested union membership of the rule. + + + **L68** Extract not Q from the other nested union branch at the same world. + + + **L69** Apply the rule to P to derive Q and contradict the extracted not Q. + + + **L70** Document the intended scope of revisionSlice. The corresponding declaration concerns: At time zero requires a true world; at every other natural time requires a false world. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L71** Define revisionSlice. At time zero requires a true world; at every other natural time requires a false world. + + + **L72** Select the single claim that the world equals the Boolean result of testing time=0. + + + **L73** Document the intended scope of revisionCanReverse. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhibits satisfiable time-zero and time-one slices whose union is unsatisfiable. No temporal update mechanism is implemented. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L74** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L75** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L76** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L77** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L78** State the checked result revisionCanReverse. Exhibits satisfiable time-zero and time-one slices whose union is unsatisfiable. No temporal update mechanism is implemented. + + + **L79** Require time slices 0 and 1 to have separate model witnesses. + + + **L80** Deny a model of their simultaneous union; this does not deny either separate witness. + + + **L81** Give true as the witness for the time-zero singleton theory. + + + **L82** Give false as the witness for time one, and leave the impossibility of holding both slices together. + + + **L83** Assume a world satisfies both time slices simultaneously. + + + **L84** Split this union model into models of the time-zero and time-one theories at the same world. + + + **L85** Extract that the common world equals true from the time-zero singleton. + + + **L86** Extract that the same world equals false from the time-one singleton. + + + **L87** Compose the two equalities through the same world to derive the impossible equality true = false. + + + **L88** Eliminate the impossible equality between distinct Boolean constructors. + + + **L89** Document the intended scope of onQuestion. The corresponding declaration concerns: The sole Unit question asks whether the Boolean world is true. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L90** Define onQuestion. The sole Unit question asks whether the Boolean world is true. + + + **L91** Define assumptionContext. Varies the assumption selecting the world while fixing its question meaning and unrestricted scope. + + + **L92** Select world b through assumptions, retain the same on-question, and allow every world in scope. + + + **L93** Define meaningContext. Fixes the world assumption to true but varies whether the question means equality to true or false. + + + **L94** Keep the true-world assumption while changing the question to equality with b; scope remains unrestricted. + + + **L95** Define scopeContext. Keeps assumptions empty and the question fixed while selecting the world through scope. + + + **L96** Leave assumptions empty and the question fixed, but let scope select world b. + + + **L97** Document the intended scope of contextDifferences. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves that changing any one of assumptions, meaning, or scope can reverse polarity, with explicit admissible witnesses in all displayed contexts. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L98** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L99** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L100** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L101** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L102** State the checked result contextDifferences. Proves that changing any one of assumptions, meaning, or scope can reverse polarity, with explicit admissible witnesses in all displayed contexts. + + + **L103** Require a positive answer under true-valued assumptions. + + + **L104** Require the negative answer under false-valued assumptions; the contexts differ. + + + **L105** Require a positive answer for the question meaning equality to true. + + + **L106** Require the negative answer when that question instead means equality to false. + + + **L107** Require the positive answer in the scope restricted to true. + + + **L108** Require the negative answer in the different scope restricted to false. + + + **L109** For either assumption selector, require an actual admissible world. + + + **L110** For either question meaning, require an actual admissible world. + + + **L111** For either scope selector, require an actual admissible world and begin the combined proof. + + + **L112** Show every Boolean world satisfies emptyTheory because membership in that theory is False. + + + **L113** Separate the positive/negative answer pairs for changed assumptions, meaning and scope, then the three nonempty-context witness obligations. + + + **L114** For the true-assumption context, read w = true from the contextual singleton assumptions. + + + **L115** For the false-assumption context, a proposed positive answer contradicts the singleton assumption w = false. + + + **L116** For the true meaning of the question, use the fixed true-world assumption to establish the positive answer. + + + **L117** For the changed false meaning, its proposed truth conflicts with the unchanged true-world assumption. + + + **L118** In the true-scope context, the scope component itself states the required positive answer. + + + **L119** In the false-scope context, a positive answer contradicts the scope component at the same world. + + + **L120** For either chosen assumption b, witness world b satisfies the empty held theory, that singleton assumption and unrestricted scope. + + + **L121** For either question meaning b, true remains a witness because the assumptions are fixed to true and scope is unrestricted. + + + **L122** For either scope selector b, world b satisfies both empty theories and the selected scope by equality. + + + **L123** Document the intended scope of Snapshot. The corresponding declaration concerns: Packages held claims, context and a natural-number revision identity; there is no history validation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L124** Declare the data interface Snapshot. Packages held claims, context and a natural-number revision identity; there is no history validation. + + + **L125** Store the theory of simultaneously held claims in the snapshot. + + + **L126** Store the snapshot’s assumptions, question meanings and scope as one Context. + + + **L127** Store a separate natural-number revision identifier; no history validation is implied. + + + **L128** Document the intended scope of SameContent. The corresponding declaration concerns: Defines sameness using claim-membership equivalence, contextual-assumption membership equivalence, pointwise meaning equivalence, and pointwise scope equivalence. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L129** Define SameContent. Defines sameness using claim-membership equivalence, contextual-assumption membership equivalence, pointwise meaning equivalence, and pointwise scope equivalence. + + + **L130** Require identical held-claim membership for every claim in both snapshots. + + + **L131** Require identical membership for every contextual assumption. + + + **L132** Require equivalent question meanings for every question at every world. + + + **L133** Require equivalent scope predicates at every world. + + + **L134** Document the intended scope of TruthfulReport. The corresponding declaration concerns: Requires a true report if semantic content or revision identity differs. It allows a true report when neither differs and implements no detector. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L135** Define TruthfulReport. Requires a true report if semantic content or revision identity differs. It allows a true report when neither differs and implements no detector. + + + **L136** Define truthful reporting as a positive flag whenever content differs or the independent revision identifiers differ. + + + **L137** Document the intended scope of semanticChangeMustBeReported. The corresponding declaration concerns: Instantiates the reporting interface with a supplied change proof; it cannot discover changes on its own. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L138** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L139** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L140** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L141** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L142** State the checked result semanticChangeMustBeReported. Instantiates the reporting interface with a supplied change proof; it cannot discover changes on its own. + + + **L143** Assume an actual change: either content differs or the revision identifiers differ. + + + **L144** Assume the reporting obligation and apply it to the preceding change premise to obtain reported=true. + + + **L145** Document the intended scope of representationOrderIrrelevant. The corresponding declaration concerns: Proves swapping the order of two singleton components leaves theory membership unchanged. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L146** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L147** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L148** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L149** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L150** State the checked result representationOrderIrrelevant. Proves swapping the order of two singleton components leaves theory membership unchanged. + + + **L151** For any claim r, swapping p and q preserves membership in their singleton-theory union. + + + **L152** For an arbitrary candidate claim r, use commutativity of disjunction to preserve union membership after reordering p and q. + + + **L153** Define contextSnapshot. Wraps a Boolean/Unit context in a snapshot with empty held theory and a default revision of zero. + + + **L154** Construct a snapshot with no held claims, the supplied context, and the supplied revision identifier. + + + **L155** Document the intended scope of hiddenContextChangeRejected. The corresponding declaration concerns: Rejects false reports for three concrete context changes and a revision-only change; also shows reporting true does not make an incompatible assumption hold. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L156** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L157** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L158** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L159** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L160** State the checked result hiddenContextChangeRejected. Rejects false reports for three concrete context changes and a revision-only change; also shows reporting true does not make an incompatible assumption hold. + + + **L161** Reject a false report when actual contextual assumptions change from true to false. + + + **L162** Reject a false report when the question’s actual meaning changes. + + + **L163** Reject a false report when the actual application scope changes. + + + **L164** Reject a false report when revision identity changes from 0 to 1 despite unchanged context. + + + **L165** Permit truthful acknowledgement of the changed assumptions with a true report. + + + **L166** Nevertheless deny that those revised false-world assumptions hold at actual true. + + + **L167** Prepare a semantic inequality: the predicates selecting true and selecting false are distinct functions. + + + **L168** Evaluate any alleged predicate equality at true; it would turn reflexive truth into true = false. + + + **L169** Split the four rejected hidden changes from the final acknowledged-but-false-assumption example. + + + **L170** Assume the hidden assumption change with report=false satisfied TruthfulReport, in order to refute that claim. + + + **L171** A claimed SameContent would equate the changed assumption predicates; their established inequality activates TruthfulReport and forces the false flag to be true. + + + **L172** Close this hidden-change branch because the required true report contradicts the specified false flag. + + + **L173** Assume the changed question meaning could be truthfully reported as unchanged. + + + **L174** At the sole question and world true, the changed meaning contradicts SameContent; the reporting obligation then forces a positive report. + + + **L175** Close this hidden-change branch because the required true report contradicts the specified false flag. + + + **L176** Assume the changed application scope could satisfy the reporting rule with a false change flag. + + + **L177** Compare the two scopes at true to refute SameContent, then apply the reporting obligation to this real scope change. + + + **L178** Close this hidden-change branch because the required true report contradicts the specified false flag. + + + **L179** The distinct revision identities alone activate the reporting rule, contradicting the false report even without a content change. + + + **L180** Construct an always-positive truthful report, while leaving the separate truth of the revised assumption to be refuted. + + + **L181** Extract the revised false-world assumption at actual true; its impossible equality shows acknowledgement did not make it true. + + + **L182** Document the intended scope of tensionWithoutContradiction. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhibits overlapping lower/upper budget bounds while proving that the two predicates differ. This is a concrete compatible-constraints example. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L183** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L184** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L185** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L186** State the checked result tensionWithoutContradiction. Exhibits overlapping lower/upper budget bounds while proving that the two predicates differ. This is a concrete compatible-constraints example. + + + **L187** Ask for a natural-number budget satisfying both lower bound 4 and upper bound 6. + + + **L188** Also assert that the two bound predicates are not identical, even though jointly satisfiable. + + + **L189** Choose budget 5, check both numeric bounds, and leave the inequality of the two objective predicates. + + + **L190** At budget 0, the upper bound holds but the lower bound cannot; therefore the objective predicates cannot be equal. + + + **L191** Document the intended scope of conflictRequiresChange. The corresponding declaration concerns: Given both signed consequences for one question, proves inconsistency as defined. It does not construct a repair or establish which premise should change. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L192** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L193** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L194** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L195** State the checked result conflictRequiresChange. Given both signed consequences for one question, proves inconsistency as defined. It does not construct a repair or establish which premise should change. + + + **L196** Assume both opposed consequences for exactly the same theory, context and question. + + + **L197** Any Consistent proof would forbid that given pair; apply it to refute consistency, without constructing a revision. + + + **L198** Document the intended scope of consistentFalse. The corresponding declaration concerns: Exhibits a satisfiable Boolean singleton theory that fails at the separately chosen world false; satisfiability is not truth at every world. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L199** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L200** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L201** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L202** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L203** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L204** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L205** State the checked result consistentFalse. Exhibits a satisfiable Boolean singleton theory that fails at the separately chosen world false; satisfiability is not truth at every world. + + + **L206** Deny that actual false models the theory whose sole claim is world=true. + + + **L207** Provide true as a model of the singleton theory and separately refute modeling it at actual false. + + + **L208** Singleton modeling at false would force false = true, an impossible Boolean equality. + + + **L209** Document the intended scope of consistentIncomplete. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows the empty Boolean theory is satisfiable while entailing neither the true-world claim nor its negation. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L210** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L211** Register source unit organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L212** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L213** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L214** Register source unit organon.relationships.roles#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L215** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L216** State the checked result consistentIncomplete. Shows the empty Boolean theory is satisfiable while entailing neither the true-world claim nor its negation. + + + **L217** The inhabited empty theory does not entail the positive true-world answer. + + + **L218** It also does not entail the negative true-world answer; prove these two failures separately. + + + **L219** Show every Boolean world satisfies emptyTheory because membership in that theory is False. + + + **L220** Provide an inhabited empty theory and leave both positive and negative entailments to be refuted. + + + **L221** A purported entailment of world=true fails at the empty theory model false. + + + **L222** A purported entailment of world≠true fails at the empty theory model true. + + + **L223** Document the intended scope of compatibilityNotEntailment. The corresponding declaration concerns: Shows that adding a claim can remain satisfiable even though the original empty theory did not entail that claim. This comment is explanatory, not a proof premise. + + + **L224** Begin provenance metadata for CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment; the mapping identifies the source-correspondence object, not a Lean premise or correctness certificate. + + + **L225** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p1 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L226** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p2 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L227** Register source unit organon.grounds.assessment#p3 with the displayed SHA-256 content identity. This is traceability metadata, not part of the theorem’s proof. + + + **L228** Close the preceding documentation/provenance comment; no executable or logical clause is added. + + + **L229** State the checked result compatibilityNotEntailment. Shows that adding a claim can remain satisfiable even though the original empty theory did not entail that claim. + + + **L230** Require a model where emptyTheory and the positive singleton claim hold together. + + + **L231** Still deny that emptyTheory by itself entails that positive claim. + + + **L232** Use world true to witness compatibility of the empty theory with the positive singleton claim. + + + **L233** Reuse the previously proved failure of positive entailment from the empty theory. + + + **L234** Finish the model witness: no claim can actually belong to emptyTheory. + + + **L236** Close namespace CoreReader.Logic; this adds no proof or premise. + + +### `leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean` + + +```lean +import Std + +namespace CoreReader.Agency + +inductive Phase | formation | application | revision + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +structure PrincipleKey where + owner : Nat + localId : Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Subject + | system (owner : Nat) + | principle (owner id : Nat) + | process (owner id : Nat) (phase : Phase) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def Subject.owner : Subject → Nat + | .system n => n + | .principle n _ => n + | .process n _ _ => n + +inductive Activity | generation | assessment + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive QuestionKind | conformity | formationBasis | applicability | revisionGrounds + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive SampleProgram | alwaysTrue | onlyAtZero + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def SampleProgram.run : SampleProgram → Nat → Bool + | .alwaysTrue, _ => true + | .onlyAtZero, n => n == 0 + +/- A generated candidate specifies both the inputs it tests and the scope it proposes to license. -/ +structure MethodDraft where + testedInputs : List Nat + claimedScope : List Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def MethodDraft.accepts (draft : MethodDraft) (program : SampleProgram) : Bool := + draft.testedInputs.all program.run + +/- This finite application asks whether a proposed rule's observed inputs support its claimed input scope. -/ +structure Inquiry where + target : Subject + kind : QuestionKind + requestedScope : List Nat + currentMethod : MethodDraft + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive ReasonContent + | purpose (inputs : List Nat) + | declaredScope (inputs : List Nat) + | observation (input : Nat) (output : Bool) + | counterexample (program : SampleProgram) (input : Nat) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def ReasonContent.identifier : ReasonContent → Nat + | .purpose _ => 0 + | .declaredScope _ => 1 + | .observation _ _ => 2 + | .counterexample _ _ => 3 + +/- Reasons have independently supplied contents, a stable local reference and the actual target they concern. -/ +structure ReasonObject where + reference : Nat + target : Subject + content : ReasonContent + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive AssessmentResult | supportedWithinScope | insufficient | notApplicable | undetermined + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive WorkOutcome + | assessment (result : AssessmentResult) + | generated (draft : MethodDraft) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A method's question, source reasons and limits are determined before looking at its activity records. +The meaning relation describes application of that method, not its universal adequacy. -/ +structure Principle where + key : PrincipleKey + activity : Activity + declaredMethod : MethodDraft + applicable : Subject → Prop + inquiry : Subject → Inquiry + reasons : Subject → List ReasonObject + limits : Subject → List Nat + meaning : Inquiry → List ReasonObject → List Nat → WorkOutcome → Prop + +structure WorkRecord where + usedPrinciple : PrincipleKey + target : Subject + activity : Activity + inquiry : Inquiry + reasons : List ReasonObject + limits : List Nat + outcome : WorkOutcome + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def RegistryCoherent (rules : List Principle) : Prop := + ∀ p ∈ rules, ∀ q ∈ rules, p.key = q.key → p = q + +def TargetResolved (rules : List Principle) : Subject → Prop + | .system owner => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key.owner = owner + | .principle owner id | .process owner id _ => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,id⟩ + +/- The inquiry names the registered target's declared method contract, not an unrelated candidate. +For a system inquiry this finite model uses the registered generation contract as its assessed artifact. -/ +def TargetContentResolved (rules : List Principle) (question : Inquiry) : Prop := + match question.target with + | .system owner => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,0⟩ ∧ question.currentMethod = p.declaredMethod + | .principle owner id | .process owner id _ => + ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,id⟩ ∧ question.currentMethod = p.declaredMethod + +def Performed (records : List WorkRecord) (s : Subject) (a : Activity) : Prop := + ∃ record ∈ records, record.target = s ∧ record.activity = a + +/- The old scope condition remains available without conflating scope with content completion. -/ +def ReflexiveScope (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : Prop := + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → rule.applicable s → Performed records s rule.activity + +/- A record uses a registered principle on the same resolvable target, question, reasons and limits, +and its result must actually follow that principle's method. A negative result can satisfy this relation. -/ +structure ValidApplication (rules : List Principle) (rule : Principle) (s : Subject) + (record : WorkRecord) : Prop where + registered : rule ∈ rules + applicable : rule.applicable s + usedIdentity : record.usedPrinciple = rule.key + targetIdentity : record.target = s + targetResolved : TargetResolved rules s + activityIdentity : record.activity = rule.activity + inquiryIdentity : record.inquiry = rule.inquiry s + inquiryTarget : record.inquiry.target = s + targetContent : TargetContentResolved rules record.inquiry + reasonsIdentity : record.reasons = rule.reasons s + reasonsNonempty : record.reasons ≠ [] + reasonTargets : ∀ reason ∈ record.reasons, reason.target = s + limitsIdentity : record.limits = rule.limits s + followsMeaning : rule.meaning record.inquiry record.reasons record.limits record.outcome + +/- The registered normative interface requires contentful application, not just activity labels. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive +organon.charter.reflexivity#p1 sha256 13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757 +organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1 sha256 8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +def Reflexive (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : Prop := + RegistryCoherent rules ∧ + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → rule.applicable s → + ∃ record ∈ records, ValidApplication rules rule s record + +theorem Reflexive.toScope {owner : Nat} {rules : List Principle} {records : List WorkRecord} + (h : Reflexive owner rules records) : ReflexiveScope owner rules records := by + intro rule hr s hs ha + obtain ⟨record, hm, hv⟩ := h.2 rule hr s hs ha + exact ⟨record, hm, hv.targetIdentity, hv.activityIdentity⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem noSelfExemption (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) + (h : Reflexive owner rules records) (rule : Principle) (hr : rule ∈ rules) + (s : Subject) (hs : s.owner = owner) (ha : rule.applicable s) : + Performed records s rule.activity := h.toScope rule hr s hs ha + +def localMethod : MethodDraft := ⟨[0],[0]⟩ + +def inquiryFor (s : Subject) : Inquiry := + match s with + | .process _ _ .formation => ⟨s, .formationBasis, [0], localMethod⟩ + | .process _ _ .application => ⟨s, .applicability, [0], localMethod⟩ + | .process _ _ .revision => ⟨s, .revisionGrounds, [0,1], localMethod⟩ + | _ => ⟨s, .conformity, [0], localMethod⟩ + +/- These original inquiry inputs do not depend on which work records happen to be present. -/ +def sourceReasonContents : QuestionKind → List ReasonContent + | .formationBasis => [.purpose [0], .declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true] + | .applicability | .conformity => [.declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true] + | .revisionGrounds => [.purpose [0,1], .declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true, + .counterexample .onlyAtZero 1] + +def reasonsFor (s : Subject) : List ReasonObject := + (sourceReasonContents (inquiryFor s).kind).map fun content => ⟨content.identifier,s,content⟩ + +/- The application-specific evaluator examines actual scope and sample/counterexample contents. +It is a finite inferential method, not a universal standard for empirical or value claims. -/ +def assessInquiry (question : Inquiry) (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) : AssessmentResult := + let contents := reasons.map ReasonObject.content + if limits ≠ question.currentMethod.claimedScope then .undetermined else + match question.kind with + | .formationBasis => + if ReasonContent.purpose question.requestedScope ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ question.requestedScope = limits + then .supportedWithinScope else .undetermined + | .applicability | .conformity => + if question.requestedScope.all (fun n => limits.contains n) then + if ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.observation 0 true ∈ contents ∧ question.requestedScope = [0] + then .supportedWithinScope else .undetermined + else .notApplicable + | .revisionGrounds => + if ReasonContent.purpose question.requestedScope ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.observation 0 true ∈ contents ∧ + contents.any (fun reason => match reason with + | .counterexample program input => question.requestedScope.contains input && + question.currentMethod.accepts program && + !(program.run input) + | _ => false) + then .insufficient else .undetermined + +def finiteMethodResult (activity : Activity) (question : Inquiry) + (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) : WorkOutcome := + match activity with + | .generation => .generated ⟨question.currentMethod.testedInputs,question.requestedScope⟩ + | .assessment => .assessment (assessInquiry question reasons limits) + +def finiteMethodMeaning (activity : Activity) (question : Inquiry) + (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) (outcome : WorkOutcome) : Prop := + outcome = finiteMethodResult activity question reasons limits + +def ownSubjects (owner : Nat) : List Subject := + [.system owner, .principle owner 0, .principle owner 1, + .process owner 0 .formation, .process owner 0 .application, .process owner 0 .revision, + .process owner 1 .formation, .process owner 1 .application, .process owner 1 .revision] + +/- Applying an existing rule is not a generation event in this application. -/ +def generationEligible : Subject → Bool + | .process _ _ .application => false + | _ => true + +def generatingRule (owner : Nat) : Principle where + key := ⟨owner,0⟩ + activity := .generation + declaredMethod := localMethod + applicable s := s ∈ ownSubjects owner ∧ generationEligible s = true + inquiry := inquiryFor + reasons := reasonsFor + limits _ := [0] + meaning := finiteMethodMeaning .generation + +def assessingRule (owner : Nat) : Principle where + key := ⟨owner,1⟩ + activity := .assessment + declaredMethod := localMethod + applicable s := s ∈ ownSubjects owner + inquiry := inquiryFor + reasons := reasonsFor + limits _ := [0] + meaning := finiteMethodMeaning .assessment + +def ownRules (owner : Nat) : List Principle := [generatingRule owner, assessingRule owner] + +/- Recorded verdicts are stated separately from the evaluator, so agreement has to be proved. -/ +def statedOutcome (activity : Activity) (s : Subject) : WorkOutcome := + match activity with + | .generation => .generated ⟨(inquiryFor s).currentMethod.testedInputs,(inquiryFor s).requestedScope⟩ + | .assessment => .assessment (match (inquiryFor s).kind with + | .revisionGrounds => .insufficient + | _ => .supportedWithinScope) + +def recordFor (rule : Principle) (s : Subject) : WorkRecord := + ⟨rule.key,s,rule.activity,rule.inquiry s,rule.reasons s,rule.limits s,statedOutcome rule.activity s⟩ + +theorem reasonsFor_nonempty (s : Subject) : reasonsFor s ≠ [] := by + cases s with + | system owner => simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + | principle owner id => simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + +theorem reasonsFor_target (s : Subject) : ∀ reason ∈ reasonsFor s, reason.target = s := by + intro reason h + obtain ⟨content, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp h + rfl + +theorem inquiryFor_target (s : Subject) : (inquiryFor s).target = s := by + cases s with + | system owner => rfl + | principle owner id => rfl + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> rfl + +/- This proof includes the actual negative revision evaluation for both principle identities. -/ +theorem ownContentEvaluates (activity : Activity) (s : Subject) : + statedOutcome activity s = finiteMethodResult activity (inquiryFor s) (reasonsFor s) [0] := by + cases activity with + | generation => rfl + | assessment => + cases s with + | system owner => rfl + | principle owner id => rfl + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> rfl + +theorem ownRegistryCoherent (owner : Nat) : RegistryCoherent (ownRules owner) := by + intro p hp q hq hkey + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hp hq + rcases hp with rfl | rfl <;> rcases hq with rfl | rfl + · rfl + · have bad := congrArg PrincipleKey.localId hkey; contradiction + · have bad := congrArg PrincipleKey.localId hkey; contradiction + · rfl + +theorem ownTargetResolved (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + TargetResolved (ownRules owner) s := by + simp only [ownSubjects, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hs + rcases hs with rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl <;> + simp [TargetResolved, ownRules, generatingRule, assessingRule] + +theorem ownTargetContent (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + TargetContentResolved (ownRules owner) (inquiryFor s) := by + simp only [ownSubjects, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hs + rcases hs with rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl <;> + simp [TargetContentResolved, inquiryFor, ownRules, generatingRule, assessingRule] + +theorem ownRecordValid (owner : Nat) (rule : Principle) (hr : rule ∈ ownRules owner) + (s : Subject) (ha : rule.applicable s) : + ValidApplication (ownRules owner) rule s (recordFor rule s) := by + have hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl + · exact ha.1 + · exact ha + have hq : rule.inquiry = inquiryFor := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hg : rule.reasons = reasonsFor := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hl : rule.limits s = [0] := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hm : rule.meaning = finiteMethodMeaning rule.activity := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + refine ⟨hr, ha, rfl, rfl, ownTargetResolved owner s hs, rfl, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_⟩ + · change (rule.inquiry s).target = s + rw [hq]; exact inquiryFor_target s + · change TargetContentResolved (ownRules owner) (rule.inquiry s) + rw [hq]; exact ownTargetContent owner s hs + · change rule.reasons s ≠ [] + rw [hg]; exact reasonsFor_nonempty s + · change ∀ reason ∈ rule.reasons s, reason.target = s + rw [hg]; exact reasonsFor_target s + · change rule.meaning (rule.inquiry s) (rule.reasons s) (rule.limits s) (statedOutcome rule.activity s) + rw [hm, hq, hg, hl] + exact ownContentEvaluates rule.activity s + +def completeOwnWork (owner : Nat) : List WorkRecord := + (ownSubjects owner).flatMap fun s => + if generationEligible s then [recordFor (generatingRule owner) s, recordFor (assessingRule owner) s] + else [recordFor (assessingRule owner) s] + +theorem assessingRecord_member (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + recordFor (assessingRule owner) s ∈ completeOwnWork owner := by + apply List.mem_flatMap.mpr + refine ⟨s,hs,?_⟩ + cases generationEligible s <;> simp + +theorem generatingRecord_member (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) + (hg : generationEligible s = true) : recordFor (generatingRule owner) s ∈ completeOwnWork owner := by + exact List.mem_flatMap.mpr ⟨s,hs,by simp [hg]⟩ + +theorem completeOwnWork_reflexive (owner : Nat) : + Reflexive owner (ownRules owner) (completeOwnWork owner) := by + refine ⟨ownRegistryCoherent owner, ?_⟩ + intro rule hr s _ ha + refine ⟨recordFor rule s, ?_, ownRecordValid owner rule hr s ha⟩ + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl + · exact generatingRecord_member owner s ha.1 ha.2 + · exact assessingRecord_member owner s ha + +theorem ownAssessmentPerformed (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + Performed (completeOwnWork owner) s .assessment := + ⟨recordFor (assessingRule owner) s, assessingRecord_member owner s hs, rfl, rfl⟩ + +def applicationRule : Principle := + { assessingRule 0 with key := ⟨0,0⟩, applicable := fun s => s = .process 0 0 .application } + +def applicationWork : List WorkRecord := [recordFor applicationRule (.process 0 0 .application)] + +theorem applicationWork_reflexive : Reflexive 0 [applicationRule] applicationWork := by + constructor + · intro p hp q hq _ + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hp hq + rw [hp,hq] + · intro rule hr s _ ha + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst rule + change s = .process 0 0 .application at ha + subst s + refine ⟨recordFor applicationRule (.process 0 0 .application), by simp [applicationWork], ?_⟩ + refine ⟨by simp, rfl, rfl, rfl, ?_, rfl, rfl, rfl, ?_, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_⟩ + · exact ⟨applicationRule, by simp, rfl⟩ + · exact ⟨applicationRule, by simp, rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact reasonsFor_nonempty _ + · exact reasonsFor_target _ + · change statedOutcome .assessment (.process 0 0 .application) = finiteMethodResult .assessment (inquiryFor (.process 0 0 .application)) (reasonsFor (.process 0 0 .application)) [0] + exact ownContentEvaluates .assessment _ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem applicabilityRetained (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : + (Reflexive owner rules records → ReflexiveScope owner rules records) ∧ + (ReflexiveScope owner rules records ↔ + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → (¬ rule.applicable s ∨ Performed records s rule.activity)) ∧ + (Reflexive 0 [applicationRule] applicationWork ∧ + ¬ Performed applicationWork (.system 0) .assessment) := by + classical + refine ⟨Reflexive.toScope, ?_, applicationWork_reflexive, ?_⟩ + · constructor + · intro h rule hr s hs + by_cases ha : rule.applicable s + · exact Or.inr (h rule hr s hs ha) + · exact Or.inl ha + · intro h rule hr s hs ha + exact (h rule hr s hs).resolve_left (not_not_intro ha) + · rintro ⟨record, hm, ht, _⟩ + simp only [applicationWork, List.mem_singleton] at hm + subst record + cases ht + +end CoreReader.Agency +``` + + + + **L1** Imports Std and its dependencies into this module. + + + **L3** Opens namespace CoreReader.Agency; file boundaries do not change declaration identity. + + + **L5** Defines formation, application and revision phase tags. + + + **L6** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L8** Identifies a registered principle by owner and local identifier. + + + **L9** Stores the owning subject identifier. + + + **L10** Stores the principle identifier within its owner. + + + **L11** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L13** Distinguishes system, principle and phase-indexed principle-process objects. + + + **L14** Represents the system itself, identified by its owner number. + + + **L15** Represents a particular principle by owner and local principle identifier. + + + **L16** Represents that principle's formation, application or revision process as a separate subject. + + + **L17** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L19** Extracts the owner's identifier from every subject constructor. + + + **L20** Extracts the owner directly from a system subject. + + + **L21** Extracts a principle's owner while ignoring its local identifier. + + + **L22** Extracts a process subject's owner independently of its principle identifier and phase. + + + **L24** Distinguishes generation work from assessment work. + + + **L25** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L27** Separates conformity, formation basis, applicability and revision-ground questions. + + + **L28** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L30** Provides a constant-true program and a program true only at zero. + + + **L31** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L33** Evaluates those two programs on natural inputs. + + + **L34** The alwaysTrue sample program accepts every natural-number input. + + + **L35** The onlyAtZero program returns true precisely at input zero. + + + **L37** Documents the following definition or result: Stores tested inputs separately from the claimed scope, allowing overextended claims. + + + **L38** Stores tested inputs separately from the claimed scope, allowing overextended claims. + + + **L39** Records the inputs on which this method draft actually tests a program. + + + **L40** Separately records the input scope the draft proposes to authorize. + + + **L41** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L43** Accepts a program when it succeeds on all listed test inputs; untested inputs are unchecked. + + + **L44** Accepts a program when every tested input returns true; claimedScope is not checked here. + + + **L46** Documents the following definition or result: Binds a target and question kind to requested scope and the target's current method content. + + + **L47** Binds a target and question kind to requested scope and the target's current method content. + + + **L48** Identifies the exact subject whose method is being examined. + + + **L49** Distinguishes conformity, formation reasons, applicability and revision reasons as inquiry purposes. + + + **L50** Records the input scope this particular inquiry asks the method to cover. + + + **L51** Attaches the actual method draft under examination, including its tested and claimed inputs. + + + **L52** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L54** Represents purposes, declared scopes, observations and concrete program/input counterexamples. + + + **L55** A purpose reason names the inputs the method is intended to address. + + + **L56** A scope reason states the method's declared input limits. + + + **L57** An observation reason records a specific input and Boolean output. + + + **L58** A counterexample reason names an actual sample program and input to check. + + + **L59** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L61** Assigns a small code to each reason constructor; the code alone is not evidential content. + + + **L62** Uses local reference 0 for purpose reasons; this is a category identifier, not a unique global identity. + + + **L63** Uses local reference 1 for declared-scope reasons. + + + **L64** Uses local reference 2 for observation reasons. + + + **L65** Uses local reference 3 for counterexample reasons. + + + **L67** Documents the following definition or result: Attaches a reason's content and reference to the subject it concerns. + + + **L68** Attaches a reason's content and reference to the subject it concerns. + + + **L69** Stores a local reference identifying this reason in the modeled inquiry. + + + **L70** Identifies the subject this reason actually concerns. + + + **L71** Stores the purpose, scope, observation or counterexample contents of the reason. + + + **L72** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L74** Allows scoped support, insufficiency, nonapplicability and undetermined results. + + + **L75** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L77** Separates an assessment result from a generated method draft. + + + **L78** Packages a verdict as an assessment outcome; a negative verdict is still an assessment. + + + **L79** Packages a newly generated method draft, without asserting that the draft is correct. + + + **L80** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L82** Documents the following definition or result: Registers a rule's identity, activity, declared method, applicability, inquiries, reasons, limits and explicit outcome semantics. + + + **L83** Documents the following definition or result: Registers a rule's identity, activity, declared method, applicability, inquiries, reasons, limits and explicit outcome semantics. + + + **L84** Registers a rule's identity, activity, declared method, applicability, inquiries, reasons, limits and explicit outcome semantics. + + + **L85** Gives the principle an owner/local identifier used to resolve its records. + + + **L86** Specifies whether this principle governs generation or assessment activity. + + + **L87** States the method draft belonging to this registered principle. + + + **L88** States the subjects on which this principle is applicable. + + + **L89** Assigns the actual question to examine for each subject. + + + **L90** Assigns the reasons supplied for each subject's question. + + + **L91** Assigns the retained input limits for each subject's application. + + + **L92** Defines when an outcome follows this principle's question, reasons and limits; no adequacy law is imposed by this field alone. + + + **L94** Stores the actual rule identity, target, activity, inquiry, reasons, limits and outcome used by an application. + + + **L95** Records the exact registered principle key claimed to have been used. + + + **L96** Records the subject on which this work was performed. + + + **L97** Records whether this work was generation or assessment. + + + **L98** Stores the concrete inquiry actually recorded for this work. + + + **L99** Stores the concrete reasons used in this work record. + + + **L100** Stores the input limits retained in this work record. + + + **L101** Stores the recorded assessment verdict or generated method draft. + + + **L102** Generates decidable equality and display instances for the preceding datatype. + + + **L104** Requires equal registered keys to identify the same principle, preventing ambiguous duplicate identities. + + + **L105** Two registered principles sharing one key must be the same principle, preventing ambiguous lookup. + + + **L107** Requires each assessed target to resolve to a registered owner or exact principle key. + + + **L108** A system subject is resolved when the registry contains some principle with that owner. + + + **L109** Principle and process subjects require a registry entry with their exact owner and local identifier. + + + **L111** Documents the following definition or result: Connects the inquiry's current method to the registered target principle's declared method. + + + **L112** Documents the following definition or result: Connects the inquiry's current method to the registered target principle's declared method. + + + **L113** Connects the inquiry's current method to the registered target principle's declared method. + + + **L114** Chooses the lookup rule from the inquiry's actual target kind. + + + **L115** A system inquiry examines the declared method of its owner's registered principle zero. + + + **L116** For a principle or its process, retain that target's actual owner and identifier for lookup. + + + **L117** Requires both exact key lookup and equality between the inquiry's method and that registered principle's method. + + + **L119** Requires an actual stored record with the requested target and activity; validity is checked separately. + + + **L120** Performed means a listed record has this exact subject and activity; by itself it checks no reason contents. + + + **L122** Documents the following definition or result: Retains the owner-and-applicability-conditioned record-coverage interface. + + + **L123** Retains the owner-and-applicability-conditioned record-coverage interface. + + + **L124** Every applicable registered rule must have a performed activity on subjects belonging to the specified owner. + + + **L126** Documents the following definition or result: Checks rule registration, applicability, object identities, resolved method content, nonempty targeted reasons, exact limits and agreement with the rule's semantics. + + + **L127** Documents the following definition or result: Checks rule registration, applicability, object identities, resolved method content, nonempty targeted reasons, exact limits and agreement with the rule's semantics. + + + **L128** Checks rule registration, applicability, object identities, resolved method content, nonempty targeted reasons, exact limits and agreement with the rule's semantics. + + + **L129** The following proof fields certify one particular work record as a valid use of rule on s. + + + **L130** Requires the rule used by the record to belong to this registry. + + + **L131** Requires that same rule to be applicable to the assessed subject. + + + **L132** Checks the record's used-principle key against this rule's exact key. + + + **L133** Checks that the work record targets this exact subject s. + + + **L134** Requires the record's subject to resolve within the same rule registry. + + + **L135** Checks that the recorded activity is the activity governed by this rule. + + + **L136** Checks that the recorded inquiry equals the inquiry this rule assigns to s. + + + **L137** Separately checks that the inquiry itself targets s, rather than an unrelated subject. + + + **L138** Checks that the inquiry's method belongs to its resolved registered target. + + + **L139** Checks the recorded reasons equal those specified by this rule for s. + + + **L140** Requires at least one actual reason in this record. + + + **L141** Requires every recorded reason to concern the same subject s. + + + **L142** Checks that recorded limits equal the rule's limits for s. + + + **L143** Requires the record's outcome to satisfy the rule's actual meaning relation on its inquiry, reasons and limits. + + + **L145** Documents the following definition or result: Requires a coherent registry and a valid recorded application for every applicable same-owner subject and registered rule; this remains a model compliance condition. + + + **L146** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L147** Records source reference organon.charter.reflexivity#p1 with content digest 13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L148** Records source reference organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1 with content digest 8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L149** Records source reference organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 with content digest ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L150** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L151** Requires a coherent registry and a valid recorded application for every applicable same-owner subject and registered rule; this remains a model compliance condition. + + + **L152** Reflexive first requires unambiguous principle registration. + + + **L153** It then ranges over each registered rule and owned subject where that rule is applicable. + + + **L154** For each such application, some listed record must satisfy all ValidApplication content checks. + + + **L156** Forgets content-validity details while extracting target/activity record coverage from full reflexivity. + + + **L157** Assumes full contentful Reflexive compliance and derives its weaker scope-only coverage. + + + **L158** Takes a registered rule, an owned subject and its applicability premise for the scope obligation. + + + **L159** Uses full Reflexive compliance to obtain the actual listed record and its ValidApplication proof. + + + **L160** Keeps that record's membership, target identity and activity identity to prove Performed. + + + **L162** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L163** Records source reference organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 with content digest ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L164** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L165** Instantiates full reflexivity at a registered applicable same-owner subject, then extracts its performance record. + + + **L166** Requires full Reflexive compliance and actual membership of the rule in the registry. + + + **L167** Also requires the target's owner to match and the rule to be applicable to it. + + + **L168** Specializes the derived scope obligation to those premises, yielding this target's performed activity. + + + **L170** Tests input zero and declares scope zero. + + + **L172** Maps formation to basis, application to applicability, revision to grounds over zero and one, and other objects to conformity. + + + **L173** Chooses the inquiry from the subject's process phase, retaining the same subject as target. + + + **L174** For formation, asks about the basis for a method covering input zero. + + + **L175** For application, asks whether the local method applies on input zero. + + + **L176** For revision, asks about extending the same local method's scope to inputs zero and one. + + + **L177** For a system or principle itself, asks conformity on the local scope {0}. + + + **L179** Documents the following definition or result: Supplies question-specific purpose/scope/observation data, adding a failing untested-input program for revision review. + + + **L180** Supplies question-specific purpose/scope/observation data, adding a failing untested-input program for revision review. + + + **L181** Formation reasons state the purpose {0}, declared scope {0}, and the observed true result at zero. + + + **L182** Applicability and conformity use the declared local scope plus the same observation at zero. + + + **L183** Revision reasons request {0,1} while acknowledging a declared scope of {0} and only a zero observation. + + + **L184** Adds the concrete onlyAtZero program at input one as a revision counterexample. + + + **L186** Attaches every chosen reason's content to this exact inquiry target. + + + **L187** Wraps each source reason with its category reference and the same subject s, preserving its actual content. + + + **L189** Documents the following definition or result: Computes scoped results from actual reason contents and method scope; a program passing current tests but failing a requested input yields insufficiency for revision. + + + **L190** Documents the following definition or result: Computes scoped results from actual reason contents and method scope; a program passing current tests but failing a requested input yields insufficiency for revision. + + + **L191** Computes scoped results from actual reason contents and method scope; a program passing current tests but failing a requested input yields insufficiency for revision. + + + **L192** Extracts reason contents for checking their substantive purpose, scope, observations and counterexamples. + + + **L193** Returns undetermined if supplied limits differ from the examined method's declared scope. + + + **L194** After checking limits, evaluates the specific kind of question asked. + + + **L195** Selects the formation-basis assessment branch. + + + **L196** Requires a purpose reason covering the inquiry's requested inputs. + + + **L197** Also requires an explicit limit declaration and equality of requested and declared scopes. + + + **L198** Formation is supportedWithinScope only when those content checks pass; otherwise it is undetermined. + + + **L199** Uses the same local checks for applicability and conformity questions. + + + **L200** First tests that every requested input belongs to the supplied limits. + + + **L201** Within those limits, requires a reason explicitly declaring that same scope. + + + **L202** Also requires the true observation at zero and a requested scope exactly equal to [0]. + + + **L203** Passing these local checks yields supportedWithinScope; incomplete evidence yields undetermined. + + + **L204** A requested input outside the supplied limits yields notApplicable. + + + **L205** Selects the revision-grounds branch, which searches for an actual scope counterexample. + + + **L206** Requires a reason stating the revised requested scope as the intended purpose. + + + **L207** Requires the old limits to be explicitly present as a declared-scope reason. + + + **L208** Requires the original successful observation at input zero. + + + **L209** Searches the supplied reason contents for a counterexample satisfying the following concrete checks. + + + **L210** A counterexample's input must be inside the newly requested scope. + + + **L211** Its program must nevertheless pass the current method's tested inputs. + + + **L212** That same program must fail at the counterexample input. + + + **L213** Other reason kinds cannot themselves satisfy this counterexample search. + + + **L214** A witnessed testing/scope gap yields insufficient; without those contents, the result is undetermined. + + + **L216** Generation keeps tested inputs and adopts requested scope; assessment executes the reason-sensitive inquiry evaluator. + + + **L217** Supplies the same reasons and limits to the activity-specific result function. + + + **L218** Chooses between generating a draft and evaluating an inquiry. + + + **L219** Generation keeps the method's tested inputs but proposes the inquiry's requested scope; correctness is not certified. + + + **L220** Assessment computes assessInquiry from this question's actual reasons and limits. + + + **L222** Defines acceptable outcome by equality with the disclosed finite evaluation algorithm, not an assumed successful result. + + + **L223** Receives the specific recorded outcome whose compliance with this activity's method is checked. + + + **L224** An outcome follows the method exactly when it equals the computed finiteMethodResult. + + + **L226** Enumerates the owner system, both registered principles and all three phases of each principle. + + + **L227** Includes the system itself and its two principle identities as owned subjects. + + + **L228** Includes formation, application and revision of principle zero as separate subjects. + + + **L229** Also includes all three phases of principle one, giving nine owned subjects total. + + + **L231** Documents the following definition or result: Excludes application-phase processes from this particular generation rule while retaining the other objects. + + + **L232** Excludes application-phase processes from this particular generation rule while retaining the other objects. + + + **L233** Treats applying an already existing principle as ineligible for generation in this application model. + + + **L234** All other represented subject kinds remain eligible for generation. + + + **L236** Registers principle zero for generation with the local method, explicit inquiries/reasons and restricted applicability. + + + **L237** Registers the generation principle under local key zero for this owner. + + + **L238** Makes this rule govern generation work. + + + **L239** Assigns the local test-and-scope draft [0]/[0] to the generation rule. + + + **L240** Generation requires both membership in this owner's nine subjects and generation eligibility. + + + **L241** Uses inquiryFor to supply the subject's actual phase-sensitive question. + + + **L242** Uses reasonsFor to supply the original target-linked reason contents. + + + **L243** Retains [0] as the generation rule's limit for every subject. + + + **L244** Requires the generated outcome to match finiteMethodResult's generation branch. + + + **L246** Registers principle one for assessment of every enumerated own subject with explicit finite evaluation semantics. + + + **L247** Registers the assessment principle under distinct local key one. + + + **L248** Makes this rule govern assessment work. + + + **L249** The assessment principle declares the same local [0]/[0] method contract. + + + **L250** Assessment applies to all nine subjects belonging to this owner. + + + **L251** Assigns the same phase-sensitive inquiry function to the assessment rule. + + + **L252** Assigns the same original target-linked reasons to its assessments. + + + **L253** Retains [0] as the assessment rule's declared limit. + + + **L254** Requires assessment outcomes to equal the evaluator's actual result. + + + **L256** Returns the two distinct registered generation and assessment principles. + + + **L258** Documents the following definition or result: Constructs expected generated drafts and scoped/insufficient assessment results, which are subsequently checked against evaluation. + + + **L259** Constructs expected generated drafts and scoped/insufficient assessment results, which are subsequently checked against evaluation. + + + **L260** Chooses the independently stated record outcome by activity. + + + **L261** The recorded generated draft retains tested inputs and adopts the inquiry's requested scope. + + + **L262** For assessment records, chooses a stated verdict from the inquiry kind rather than calling assessInquiry here. + + + **L263** Revision inquiries are recorded as insufficient. + + + **L264** The remaining represented inquiries are recorded as supportedWithinScope. + + + **L266** Builds a record from the supplied rule and subject; registry membership and content validity require the later ValidApplication proof. + + + **L267** Builds a record from this rule's identity, inquiry, reasons and limits, but uses the separately stated outcome. + + + **L269** Exhausts subject/phase constructors to prove each concrete inquiry has reasons. + + + **L270** Checks reason-list nonemptiness for each kind of subject. + + + **L271** System inquiries use the conformity reasons, which contain scope and observation entries. + + + **L272** Principle inquiries likewise have the nonempty scope-and-observation list. + + + **L273** Each process phase reduces to its actual nonempty formation, application or revision reason list. + + + **L275** Uses the reason-list map construction to prove every reason targets the same subject. + + + **L276** Takes any reason known to occur in this subject's constructed reason list. + + + **L277** Inverts the map construction to recover the source content and replace the reason with its target-tagged wrapper. + + + **L278** That wrapper's target is s by construction, so target equality is reflexive. + + + **L280** Checks each constructor to prove the generated inquiry retains its subject identity. + + + **L281** Checks the inquiry target for system, principle and process subjects separately. + + + **L282** The system inquiry was constructed with that same system as target. + + + **L283** The principle inquiry likewise retains that same principle target. + + + **L284** Every process phase uses the original process subject as its inquiry target. + + + **L286** Documents the following definition or result: Computes every subject/phase assessment and generation case, showing stored expected outcomes agree with the actual algorithm, including insufficiency. + + + **L287** Computes every subject/phase assessment and generation case, showing stored expected outcomes agree with the actual algorithm, including insufficiency. + + + **L288** Requires the independently stated outcome to equal actual evaluation of this subject's question, reasons and [0] limits. + + + **L289** Splits this equality check between generated drafts and assessment verdicts. + + + **L290** Both generation definitions construct the identical tested-input/requested-scope draft. + + + **L291** For assessment, the stated verdict must now be checked against the actual evaluator. + + + **L292** Separates the finite assessment check by subject kind. + + + **L293** The system's conformity contents compute to the stated supportedWithinScope verdict. + + + **L294** The principle's conformity contents compute to that same supportedWithinScope verdict. + + + **L295** Formation/application compute support; revision computes insufficient from the program passing zero but failing one. + + + **L297** Separates local identifiers zero and one to prove the two-rule registry has no ambiguous key. + + + **L298** Takes two registered principles whose keys are assumed equal. + + + **L299** Restricts both registry memberships to the actual generation or assessment rule. + + + **L300** Examines the four resulting pairs of concrete rules. + + + **L301** When both are the generation rule, principle equality holds directly. + + + **L302** Generation key 0 cannot equal assessment key 1; projecting localId produces a contradiction. + + + **L303** The reverse mixed pair would require localId 1=0, also impossible. + + + **L304** When both are the assessment rule, principle equality holds directly. + + + **L306** Checks all nine enumerated subjects resolve to an actual registered owner/principle. + + + **L307** The subject selected from ownSubjects must resolve to this owner's actual registry. + + + **L308** Expands membership hs into the nine concrete owned subjects. + + + **L309** Handles each of those nine subjects with its original owner and principle identifier fixed. + + + **L310** Finds the generation or assessment registry entry matching each target key. + + + **L312** Checks each inquiry's method matches its registered target's declared local method. + + + **L313** Requires the selected subject's inquiry to examine its own registered declared method. + + + **L314** Again enumerates the nine concrete subjects from the actual membership premise. + + + **L315** Checks target-method correspondence separately for each system, principle and phase subject. + + + **L316** Both registered rules declare localMethod, exactly the method inquiryFor assigns to every enumerated target. + + + **L318** Combines identity, reason-target, scope, registry and actual evaluation facts to validate each applicable generated record. + + + **L319** Assumes the chosen registered rule is applicable to this subject s. + + + **L320** Proves the concrete recordFor rule s satisfies every ValidApplication field. + + + **L321** First derives that applicability places s in this owner's subject list. + + + **L322** Uses registry membership to restrict rule to one of the two owned rules. + + + **L323** Separates the generation and assessment applicability conditions. + + + **L324** Generation applicability includes owned-subject membership as its first conjunct. + + + **L325** Assessment applicability is exactly that owned-subject membership. + + + **L326** Establishes that this actual rule uses inquiryFor as its inquiry function. + + + **L327** Reduces registered-rule membership to generation or assessment to inspect its inquiry field. + + + **L328** Both possible rules define their inquiry field as inquiryFor. + + + **L329** Establishes that the chosen rule uses reasonsFor as its reason provider. + + + **L330** Again restricts the rule to the two actual registry entries before inspecting reasons. + + + **L331** Both entries supply exactly reasonsFor. + + + **L332** Establishes that this rule's limits for s are exactly [0]. + + + **L333** Resolves registry membership before inspecting the selected rule's limits. + + + **L334** Both owned rules retain [0] as their limit. + + + **L335** Establishes that the chosen rule's meaning is the result function for its own activity. + + + **L336** Resolves registry membership to inspect generation versus assessment meaning. + + + **L337** In either case, the rule's meaning is finiteMethodMeaning specialized to that rule's activity. + + + **L338** Builds ValidApplication using registry/applicability premises, record identities and resolved target; leaves inquiry, reasons and computed meaning checks to follow. + + + **L339** The remaining inquiry-target goal is about this rule's actual inquiry on s. + + + **L340** Replaces the rule's inquiry with inquiryFor, whose target-preservation theorem proves it targets s. + + + **L341** The remaining method-identity goal checks the registered target of this rule's inquiry. + + + **L342** Rewrites to inquiryFor and uses the concrete owned-target method-resolution theorem. + + + **L343** Reduces record reason nonemptiness to nonemptiness of this rule's supplied reasons. + + + **L344** Rewrites those reasons to reasonsFor and applies its nonempty-list theorem. + + + **L345** Reduces reason-target consistency to every supplied reason targeting s. + + + **L346** Rewrites to reasonsFor and uses its target-preserving construction theorem. + + + **L347** The final obligation compares the separately stated outcome against this rule's actual inquiry, reasons, limits and meaning. + + + **L348** Substitutes the four established identities for meaning, inquiry, reasons and [0] limits. + + + **L349** Uses ownContentEvaluates to prove the recorded outcome equals the actual method result. + + + **L351** Constructs records for all nine subjects, including generation only where its eligibility condition holds. + + + **L352** Builds the full log by concatenating the records assigned to each owned subject. + + + **L353** Eligible subjects receive both a generation record and an assessment record. + + + **L354** Application-phase subjects receive assessment only, matching generation's explicit applicability restriction. + + + **L356** Places each subject's assessment record in the flat-mapped complete work list. + + + **L357** Claims this owned subject's assessment record occurs in the constructed full log. + + + **L358** Uses flatMap membership: choose a subject whose assigned record list contains the desired record. + + + **L359** Chooses the same s and its supplied owned-subject membership hs. + + + **L360** Whether generation is eligible or not, the assigned list contains s's assessment record. + + + **L362** Places a subject's generation record in the work list under explicit generation eligibility. + + + **L363** Adds generation eligibility to owned membership before claiming a generation record in the full log. + + + **L364** Selects s's flatMap branch; hg makes that branch include the requested generation record. + + + **L366** Combines coherent registry, membership and content-valid applications to establish the concrete nonempty reflexivity model. + + + **L367** States full contentful reflexivity for the actual two-rule registry and constructed work log. + + + **L368** Provides the proved registry coherence and leaves contentful coverage for each applicable subject. + + + **L369** Takes an actual registered rule and applicable subject; applicability itself will supply needed owned membership. + + + **L370** Chooses recordFor rule s and its already proved content validity, leaving only its presence in the full log. + + + **L371** Resolves rule membership to the generation or assessment entry. + + + **L372** Splits record membership by those two actual rule cases. + + + **L373** For generation, ha supplies owned membership and eligibility, which place its record in the full log. + + + **L374** For assessment, ha directly supplies the owned membership needed for its record. + + + **L376** Extracts the constructed assessment record for a listed own subject. + + + **L377** Claims a performed assessment on s in the same complete work log. + + + **L378** Uses s's assessment record, its proved log membership and exact target/activity identities as the Performed witness. + + + **L380** Restricts an assessment rule to one application-phase subject and assigns it a resolvable key. + + + **L381** Restricts the assessment rule to exactly principle-zero's application process, with key (0,0). + + + **L383** Stores the one fully specified application assessment record. + + + **L385** Checks the singleton registry and record satisfy full content-valid reflexivity on their restricted applicability. + + + **L386** Separates singleton-registry coherence from coverage of its sole applicable subject. + + + **L387** Takes any two rules in that singleton registry; key equality is unnecessary because membership already identifies both. + + + **L388** Singleton membership makes both rules equal to applicationRule. + + + **L389** Substituting these identities proves the two rules are equal. + + + **L390** Takes an applicable subject for a rule in the singleton application registry. + + + **L391** Uses singleton membership to identify the rule as applicationRule. + + + **L392** Replaces rule with that exact applicationRule throughout the coverage obligation. + + + **L393** Unfolds applicability to show s is exactly owner-zero principle-zero's application process. + + + **L394** Substitutes that exact process for s, fixing the work target. + + + **L395** Selects the sole record in applicationWork and proves its membership; content validity remains to check. + + + **L396** Fills immediate registry, applicability and record-identity fields; leaves target resolution, reasons and computed outcome checks. + + + **L397** The target key resolves to applicationRule itself in the singleton registry. + + + **L398** That same registered rule supplies the localMethod actually examined by the inquiry. + + + **L399** The application inquiry's reasons are nonempty by reasonsFor_nonempty. + + + **L400** Every application reason targets this exact application-process subject. + + + **L401** The remaining meaning obligation is equality of the stated application assessment and its actual finite evaluation. + + + **L402** Uses ownContentEvaluates to certify that equality for the application-phase assessment. + + + **L404** Opens provenance metadata binding CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained to the following source references; this metadata is not a proof premise. + + + **L405** Records source reference organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 with content digest ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc; matching a digest establishes source identity, not semantic fidelity. + + + **L406** Closes the preceding documentation/provenance comment; it adds no executable code. + + + **L407** Derives record scope from full reflexivity, proves its classical conditional/disjunctive equivalence, and gives a valid restricted example with no system assessment. + + + **L408** The first clause retains the implication from full contentful reflexivity to scope coverage. + + + **L409** The second clause restates conditional scope coverage as an either/or obligation. + + + **L410** For each owned subject and registered rule, either the rule is inapplicable or its activity was performed. + + + **L411** The concrete singleton application log satisfies full reflexivity under its restricted rule. + + + **L412** Yet that same log contains no assessment of the system itself, where this rule is not applicable. + + + **L413** Uses classical case splitting on possibly undecidable applicability predicates. + + + **L414** Supplies the general scope projection and concrete restricted witness; leaves the equivalence and missing-system-record proof. + + + **L415** Proves both directions of the applicability-or-performance reformulation. + + + **L416** Assumes conditional scope coverage and fixes a registered rule with an owned subject. + + + **L417** Splits on whether that exact rule is applicable to this subject. + + + **L418** When applicable, coverage supplies the performed activity, satisfying the right disjunct. + + + **L419** When inapplicable, that negative applicability fact satisfies the left disjunct. + + + **L420** For the reverse direction, assumes the disjunction and actual applicability on the owned subject. + + + **L421** Rules out the inapplicable disjunct using ha, leaving the required performed activity. + + + **L422** Assumes a system assessment exists and extracts its listed record plus target identity. + + + **L423** The singleton applicationWork list forces that record to be its application-process record. + + + **L424** Replaces the alleged system-assessment record with that sole process record. + + + **L425** Its process target cannot equal the system target, contradicting the assumed record identity. + + + **L427** Closes the current namespace. + + +### `leanified/CoreReader.lean` + + +```lean +import CoreReader.Integration +``` + + + + **L1** Imports CoreReader.Integration and its dependencies into this module. + diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/README.md b/lean/philosophy/evidence/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..933e133 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,5 @@ +# Selected current checks + +These actual build, declaration/type/dependency and four-view checks were selected from a fresh ordinary-copy execution after the 2026-09-15 source migration. The [independent migration comparison](../reviews/source-migration-2026-09-15.md) supplies the bounded new-source judgment; unchanged executable Lean text and target bodies retain the disclosed earlier interpretation scope. The [provenance follow-up](../reviews/source-migration-provenance-2026-09-15.md) separately reviews two source-hash comments. The preceding complete source/run/readers were preserved and replayed separately before replacement. + +`kernel.json` and `manuscript-check.json` report mechanical checks, not philosophical correctness. `execution-identity.json` records loaded tools and observed runtimes, not tool approval. All partial, nonformal and application-specific limits remain. Reruns write separate ignored `checks/` records rather than changing these selected outputs. diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean b/lean/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8a31cb5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/audit.lean @@ -0,0 +1,317 @@ +import Lean +import CoreReader +#check CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.Generative +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.Generative +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.Generative + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.Generative " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment +#print axioms CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails +#print axioms CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason +#print axioms CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice +#print axioms CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible +#print axioms CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal +#print axioms CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons +#print axioms CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent +#print axioms CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity +#print axioms CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment +#print axioms CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) +#check CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation +#print axioms CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation +run_cmd do + let info ← Lean.getConstInfo `CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation + Lean.logInfo ("ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation " ++ (Lean.Json.str (reprStr info.type)).compress) diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/declaration-types.json b/lean/philosophy/evidence/declaration-types.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6a1ded1 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/declaration-types.json @@ -0,0 +1,254 @@ +{ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemHeld []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemCapability []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Method.realize [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))", + "sha256": "dad931194e28b783758526be24d06dac429ccbeb57a5a3f5c80e0cad222cfac6" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "5abf5b02f1317efd145abf9c7e2250c40fe0338597fbde695b19704a7358b2d9" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.permitsVersion [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy []))))", + "sha256": "48d5f6ad7b8a2cad12991978a9c6e1935da61fd5e29a47bad8be1944ec9d583a" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.FormKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `v\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hc\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.current []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.revisable []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "f85088f4ea31cbc58e54317eb4757866d4ee7462b1df7211e3502845e2ceadc2" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.FormKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.revisable [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAdd.hAdd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instHAdd [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instAddNat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))", + "sha256": "0837fbe429c46c0de4ae2dca13e61a8816da6d729be2aa9c82806c1c6fff9927" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.permitsVersion [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.inventory [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.inventory [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.abstractionLayers [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.abstractionLayers [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.vocabulary [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.vocabulary [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.some [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 66)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.knowledge [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.collaborator [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 85)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.experience [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.collaborator [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 104)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.experience [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.knowledge [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.requirementsMet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.withinBudget [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.withinBudget [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.StableReason [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.report [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.owner [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.owner [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.before [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.after [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.reportedNewOperation\n [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.input [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.expectedOutput\n [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.before [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.after [])\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement\n []))))))))))))))))))))))))))))", + "sha256": "a66f85d3ecf6568b98ad56fc37ae5f4b09430a9d378970b52f3b1894b32c7905" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `achievement\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actualApplicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "e8b9e0ab7116417e1e72a14b1ccdf5099f40dfddff581d7422247d809bc965eb" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `achievement\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actual\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `reliableHere\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `And []) (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ConcreteAchievementExample []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "822b2cd2c70c2493443582652d19cda0749358f1ae5fe32b0fc2455c2f661082" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Theory []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `inhabited\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "191b2285b41211251808018ed56af50bc998cb2f059f48b01623fed7eeb33511" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseP []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseRule []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseNotQ []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.jointTheory [])))))", + "sha256": "ce600ce368828d06484c984614aec2b600ec72861b52e37df3c9d127e1869630" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))))", + "sha256": "904fee6061e034e3e5a694e9f138baa29300091ad3f835696fa0c2f1b8dfbb75" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))", + "sha256": "9b30750eff84685cb7297ce22b6084325b978050dd8dec01126589d972d9dda5" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `reported\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `changed\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.SameContent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot.revisionIdentity [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot.revisionIdentity []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "efc916aa358c8aa833410fd4ded0335d1abee82277a97caa895c86c0956981d7" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `r\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "ce06e20cbe631d314f7bdbadaa1997a5e3e337987ff75a6a1d2c1d9ee48867fe" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context.assumptions [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))))))", + "sha256": "58cca7210751f90e96b303a8c40928a3d735b0ec64e6ce80d5debf837a2ee8d6" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `budget\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE `n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []) (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero)) (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "c9dfa385d1b60a11fa792962c10a8b8541b2eb7d20879a306e758de9c40f4bfa" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Theory []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `positive\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `negative\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "4b3231ac25a534c2699cd8f548a59a7d8beb1cb3923456f10c95081a3b6b5be3" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))", + "sha256": "617a316a7963ffe373dd9f48edb8ade6c82b6a1018f83c0d7832917977c953e8" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))", + "sha256": "4a043245371faf22b23e9eef01ba9b03c92d959166ff9e68e427b560343dbe8f" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "edd8696ffc9dbc88b13d4e0a1d24912d33ece35258a72c2714303ec2b75d0247" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rule\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hr\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Membership.mem [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hs\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ha\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.applicable []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.activity []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "af1ee7c715a8432d4c92816c109aee67732d8307aeaab1d6a8d66ef14f4f9e80" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rule\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Membership.mem [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.applicable [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.activity [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationRule []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.system [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Activity.assessment []))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "bc78545b62c505f56ce296e85615d7fa73b1a61c223696c87dc8bb532f6e9316" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.selfTest [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "bbc48f4b905f196e6c939615e1e8deb2b82ba924ea85d87214b3a9db96bcc67d" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OwnedRevisionExample []))))", + "sha256": "3a32d7d0b5d238eb04c1ff3c4040363e9eba221e1304bb0160579141572bd88e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `claim\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actualApplicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "4517c2eaf39a10fcd99876dc5a244ff06747ca6c130c8c03c7da6860e7bd2e12" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `weaker\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "c687c4deee04291784db05208dfae9b0d299ee0512dcdf74786cea5919b7a9ef" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `X\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `wide\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `narrow\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `included\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 1) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 6) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 7) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "d20c49b2b30fa2639dcb643d5e085dc69f604e8fcd6b63523a0f635d157a33ce" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Or []) (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 2) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 1) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "b4e682692e878b15864ca7fbab372218fd46ce2faacd91e88991bc49ce1b4764" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `xs\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ys\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "4aa38f6f1cacfad2600cd191577020eebf845efd0f76b6e546aceb92f46a17ad" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition []))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "a3b8b9d25b7920c39ba44034d45faba23a579fac6b9bce01044a6ef8270a80c4" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation.assumptions []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "85f13987f0b8fce1cae5bbb59711d18a0c887a38e73b8bd00e1fd6b1c34fbfac" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record.test [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))))))))", + "sha256": "a1ca8f88b3e278adc56e4943aeea5513afbc3a4b45fc6aab79322bb788553da8" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "244a4c828b24802472a24f81b01a70de6e709e44128ed21a8515578c2498843a" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.Position [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.reasons [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.Position [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))", + "sha256": "8a3f43790ce0efbba6a4f2be8e1eebe1ea1ff6f0df1051bad2eeda3a73329895" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.starting []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.contradictoryStartingPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.impossibleAdoptionPosition [])))))))", + "sha256": "568b8ffce3fb2209e2c6e258286982e02357a12f7df5daf2df0013af31ace2a5" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.inferential []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointReasonsExample [])))", + "sha256": "c224d6fd8d50802cf08feb6f03c519161f4161cbcc1ccb85aca1d428bab6507e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `outside\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 2451398637) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 33)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 2451398637) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 57)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])))))))", + "sha256": "c551de35323f24746aadf22a6611ebacdb1cb94e8b4395566041cea3514158ab" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 3849707129) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 28)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 3849707129) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 45)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))", + "sha256": "9d56436068f437ca82a13d660b482c2c010378472a97d87202c93c58cc14f534" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])))))", + "sha256": "7e3fa4592c2b19d90c2f858f7168ded7b64f30e40cf7c0232ac87752ced3204c" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))", + "sha256": "f0ef7c27557eaa39351f56c8807f56428d4b3bf3e7adfcd888ebd0ecd2ec64a4" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.letE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.actualOutcome []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.actualOutcome []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))))\n true)\n true", + "sha256": "a0bb99242c31620ee4c5b6e988883f3aa22b64126ffee1e765f5520bda35f61f" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))))", + "sha256": "a92288aebed02e0acbf848f44ff85a32e40821fecafc92bb8ce7dcb89a31c74e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContractEvidence []))", + "sha256": "43406d330c84bc09d691acee59de1fc29de6234aeb88fe44733b301b919f3fd7" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ScopedApplicationEvidence []))", + "sha256": "a527a2020908a813787d377f4918c57975e27b6bd8d6449e15be34c05c40489e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `certificate\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessorId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 42)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 42))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessedId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 7)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 7))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessorId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessedId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ProcessGrounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))", + "sha256": "fe5654cff59f9fdd8d2c45b06fb9c074424a4dc98b3f9131c1fbce46b08f9cee" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `kind\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.InventoryKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ops\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `op\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Available [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAppend.hAppend [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instHAppendOfAppend [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instAppend [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Available [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "c42372dbdafd2e978ce5040103e18e2e8a26326e3f9eae43e2c902e076ab5d23" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `req\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `i\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "5e18307d2fd827fe08aa1e168caa706d5bcd1aa43c40eec1b7c6ff91b81e66f0" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.conventional [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.established [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.convention [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))", + "sha256": "ac0033fbed40e31d070cb960495ad45eb8726534475c7329dca05c8da8f6a1e5" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityArticulation [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.AssessmentAccurate []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `selected\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.successor []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.PolicyIndependenceExample [])", + "sha256": "eee90ae5540da7b23ad95176b6a736267b8b4ef0e9413bed8e5045fb71acaddc" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `candidate\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Feasible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.implementation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity [])))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason []))", + "sha256": "f3437f4015fdbcf92e04b7da7b29f047b90d4189c21e558d82314ff75051b319" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))", + "sha256": "e536339546398c5b31cb38c3a821354d883487b067c95607379060c352460ccd" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.explanation []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.applicability []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.procedure []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))))))", + "sha256": "1ec7968d246d20d2b1493c1e285053ff3d37fd3fc2c90aa7ce1af6fd73464926" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.successorImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))", + "sha256": "50e8d5c0a1072c29f5281a230d2329b8e7c22f8abc90a8222f7689c81806b65d" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedHeld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.context [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))))", + "sha256": "3aab586ee7ffced9c73f73f9eef729d01d47a6bbb0df57d834248a6b2a439e0f" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capability [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))", + "sha256": "42bfb4a096464e6d78e2b2fab189eab062eccc80015fff1c83d501d91b7f5a0b" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.GroundsProvision [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.limits [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.relevantCriticism [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive []))))))", + "sha256": "84129ee9e21d37bed63d1ba724e180ef0d35eaa8a3301454c50137e2e2ba682d" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.form [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.principleForm [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.mode [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.governance [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.review [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.review [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))))", + "sha256": "1ec61cc64f16f1a54396b2b73da6f7aa90251e6563d882b8f92b3af2d8128151" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownRules [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))))", + "sha256": "c6ba911bc5b6a702eeddb7e1c345e58c099b2032b097a36768b315f016ea31a6" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.costAllowanceRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capability []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))))", + "sha256": "27e83eb0e659bf4c081cd29c507d09939dc4a07b00996d95f03220f991771f25" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `req\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `contract\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `applicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.rules []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.work []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `Membership.mem\n [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero), Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `Membership.mem\n [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero), Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 9))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 5) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetArticulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 5) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "651f3b9c399a82d84279c623426939d6383c20da613db99958f86c454866fef3" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.relevantCriticism [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive [])))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "6323d4f56fb47c305d52b3f61a3fd8086550b60929520138401ced1e161120f8" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAdd.hAdd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instHAdd [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instAddNat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))))", + "sha256": "6909f108bbe2e4fd72181deb801b653071f204ab688a8a4cc7e99c4ede0d2728" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))))", + "sha256": "8c23f5b979f61d621e8ee78193561d5f1251459dc992801be540bee18948150e" + } +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/execution-identity.json b/lean/philosophy/evidence/execution-identity.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..2ab482f --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/execution-identity.json @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "assessment": "self_reported_not_approval", + "sources_at_module_load": { + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/check.js": "74194794f7b058740255aa0ad8099b2c27bc8b4cf82cbf0f1336fc03f5348240", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/manuscript.js": "e1aed330b703c2a5901e0cbca4b47b4d75602375646a462ced2e268f1aba4dcc", + "skills/organon-core-leanify-prove/scripts/targets.js": "cab6a7a55b852a2f29ca00ef9f03331a30549b2ba16d32d69138f488fdbc8888", + "scripts/lib/sections.js": "35c8cc81ea851e79af7ef9996e800112efa97c71005abecd59287a52ba8da180", + "scripts/lib/frontmatter.js": "42773238b4a39f6d5d374a814b5e23821340d55aea3e1972e5cac5a6820c354e" + }, + "node": { + "status": "observed", + "version": "v22.23.2" + }, + "lean": { + "status": "observed", + "version": "4.33.1" + }, + "lake": { + "status": "observed", + "version": "5.0.0-src+819816b" + } +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/inputs-sha256.json b/lean/philosophy/evidence/inputs-sha256.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f59f508 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/inputs-sha256.json @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ +{ + "run.json": "773ef6bd7c459a65cc678d26d7561c04453c50f0afb92b77bcbf72da6171c8b2", + "PREREGISTERED.md": "242feb5156c4dd9b7d47dcf712a8c196131a2907ea331d06d4aab8ea8fe3a079", + "snapshots/PHILOSOPHY.md": "226fa3522943955d5a0f1f0b88e883c97b3505b3bcfd285329e432757912543f", + "leanified/lakefile.toml": "45b7327bd68ebe8cbca3dccd419df21e4876773005900079cd7c6fdf0f43dd49", + "targets.json": "2400383120ab2d98454597a73cdcaaadf45b8e47b18a646118708dc5d81da2a4", + "leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean": "b0dca4187a88a0a0f33c3dd6a11bb383907603ef514e80e9e3f09f95ce9633e2", + "leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean": "07cf17f73802bdd34ae00ecba317ddc0283321cce00f15a84b69df421c3fe25f", + "leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean": "18beb2b94450fdab36229b645e2df129348f3e67306104e842e0dce6e72443e8", + "leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean": "b5ba8617e06f03963c4284344fbe3c662188f1b88542c55cc15beb1cd5f99c03", + "leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean": "6b70be8964763b6447a2603bde665ff58106678f2e1d421bebd8c6b29ae46e04", + "leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean": "25292faa71c5585a8f50cb07d72c2f44fa12dcfb125b2b92094f9306fecb4fd0", + "leanified/CoreReader.lean": "80eee78ec3453fefdb26d3dbce97f0447d4b9ffeb4683604dad0c03902a1bfdd" +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json b/lean/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..e0b8cdf --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/kernel.json @@ -0,0 +1,760 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "errors": [], + "checked": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits", + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency", + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict", + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences", + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected", + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction", + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive", + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption", + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained", + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference", + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer", + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment", + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability", + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails", + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice", + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible", + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal", + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons", + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent", + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation" + ], + "dependencies": { + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative": [], + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers": [], + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse": [], + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete": [], + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive": [], + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption": [], + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference": [], + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal": [], + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons": [], + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments": [ + "propext", + "Classical.choice", + "Quot.sound" + ], + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment": [ + "propext" + ], + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation": [ + "propext", + "Quot.sound" + ] + }, + "reported_reviews": [], + "proof_targets": { + "sha256": "2400383120ab2d98454597a73cdcaaadf45b8e47b18a646118708dc5d81da2a4", + "complete": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "entries": [ + { + "id": "T01", + "kind": "boundary", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [] + }, + { + "id": "T02", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T03", + "kind": "specification", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T04", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T05", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T06", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T07", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T08", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency", + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T09", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T10", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T11", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction", + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T12", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T13", + "kind": "specification", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T14", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption", + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained", + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T15", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T16", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T17", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T18", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T19", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T20", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T21", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer", + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment", + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T22", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails", + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T23", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T24", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible", + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal", + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons", + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T25", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T26", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T27", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T28", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ] + } + ] + }, + "declaration_types": { + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemHeld []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemCapability []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Method.realize [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))", + "sha256": "dad931194e28b783758526be24d06dac429ccbeb57a5a3f5c80e0cad222cfac6" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "5abf5b02f1317efd145abf9c7e2250c40fe0338597fbde695b19704a7358b2d9" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.permitsVersion [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy []))))", + "sha256": "48d5f6ad7b8a2cad12991978a9c6e1935da61fd5e29a47bad8be1944ec9d583a" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.FormKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `v\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hc\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.current []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.revisable []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "f85088f4ea31cbc58e54317eb4757866d4ee7462b1df7211e3502845e2ceadc2" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.FormKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.revisable [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAdd.hAdd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instHAdd [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instAddNat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))", + "sha256": "0837fbe429c46c0de4ae2dca13e61a8816da6d729be2aa9c82806c1c6fff9927" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.permitsVersion [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.inventory [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.inventory [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.abstractionLayers [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.abstractionLayers [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.vocabulary [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.vocabulary [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.some [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 66)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.knowledge [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.collaborator [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 85)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.experience [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.collaborator [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 104)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.experience [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.knowledge [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.requirementsMet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.withinBudget [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.withinBudget [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.StableReason [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.report [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.owner [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.owner [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.before [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.after [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.reportedNewOperation\n [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.input [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.expectedOutput\n [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.before [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.after [])\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement\n []))))))))))))))))))))))))))))", + "sha256": "a66f85d3ecf6568b98ad56fc37ae5f4b09430a9d378970b52f3b1894b32c7905" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `achievement\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actualApplicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "e8b9e0ab7116417e1e72a14b1ccdf5099f40dfddff581d7422247d809bc965eb" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `achievement\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actual\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `reliableHere\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `And []) (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ConcreteAchievementExample []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "822b2cd2c70c2493443582652d19cda0749358f1ae5fe32b0fc2455c2f661082" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Theory []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `inhabited\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "191b2285b41211251808018ed56af50bc998cb2f059f48b01623fed7eeb33511" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseP []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseRule []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseNotQ []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.jointTheory [])))))", + "sha256": "ce600ce368828d06484c984614aec2b600ec72861b52e37df3c9d127e1869630" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))))", + "sha256": "904fee6061e034e3e5a694e9f138baa29300091ad3f835696fa0c2f1b8dfbb75" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))", + "sha256": "9b30750eff84685cb7297ce22b6084325b978050dd8dec01126589d972d9dda5" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `reported\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `changed\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.SameContent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot.revisionIdentity [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot.revisionIdentity []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "efc916aa358c8aa833410fd4ded0335d1abee82277a97caa895c86c0956981d7" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `r\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "ce06e20cbe631d314f7bdbadaa1997a5e3e337987ff75a6a1d2c1d9ee48867fe" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context.assumptions [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))))))", + "sha256": "58cca7210751f90e96b303a8c40928a3d735b0ec64e6ce80d5debf837a2ee8d6" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `budget\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE `n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []) (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero)) (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "c9dfa385d1b60a11fa792962c10a8b8541b2eb7d20879a306e758de9c40f4bfa" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Theory []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `positive\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `negative\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "4b3231ac25a534c2699cd8f548a59a7d8beb1cb3923456f10c95081a3b6b5be3" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))", + "sha256": "617a316a7963ffe373dd9f48edb8ade6c82b6a1018f83c0d7832917977c953e8" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))", + "sha256": "4a043245371faf22b23e9eef01ba9b03c92d959166ff9e68e427b560343dbe8f" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "edd8696ffc9dbc88b13d4e0a1d24912d33ece35258a72c2714303ec2b75d0247" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rule\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hr\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Membership.mem [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hs\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ha\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.applicable []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.activity []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "af1ee7c715a8432d4c92816c109aee67732d8307aeaab1d6a8d66ef14f4f9e80" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rule\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Membership.mem [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.applicable [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.activity [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationRule []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.system [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Activity.assessment []))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "bc78545b62c505f56ce296e85615d7fa73b1a61c223696c87dc8bb532f6e9316" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.selfTest [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "bbc48f4b905f196e6c939615e1e8deb2b82ba924ea85d87214b3a9db96bcc67d" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OwnedRevisionExample []))))", + "sha256": "3a32d7d0b5d238eb04c1ff3c4040363e9eba221e1304bb0160579141572bd88e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `claim\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actualApplicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "4517c2eaf39a10fcd99876dc5a244ff06747ca6c130c8c03c7da6860e7bd2e12" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `weaker\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "c687c4deee04291784db05208dfae9b0d299ee0512dcdf74786cea5919b7a9ef" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `X\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `wide\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `narrow\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `included\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 1) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 6) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 7) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "d20c49b2b30fa2639dcb643d5e085dc69f604e8fcd6b63523a0f635d157a33ce" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Or []) (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 2) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 1) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "b4e682692e878b15864ca7fbab372218fd46ce2faacd91e88991bc49ce1b4764" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `xs\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ys\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)", + "sha256": "4aa38f6f1cacfad2600cd191577020eebf845efd0f76b6e546aceb92f46a17ad" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition []))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "a3b8b9d25b7920c39ba44034d45faba23a579fac6b9bce01044a6ef8270a80c4" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation.assumptions []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "85f13987f0b8fce1cae5bbb59711d18a0c887a38e73b8bd00e1fd6b1c34fbfac" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record.test [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))))))))", + "sha256": "a1ca8f88b3e278adc56e4943aeea5513afbc3a4b45fc6aab79322bb788553da8" + }, + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))", + "sha256": "244a4c828b24802472a24f81b01a70de6e709e44128ed21a8515578c2498843a" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.Position [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.reasons [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.Position [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))", + "sha256": "8a3f43790ce0efbba6a4f2be8e1eebe1ea1ff6f0df1051bad2eeda3a73329895" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.starting []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.contradictoryStartingPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.impossibleAdoptionPosition [])))))))", + "sha256": "568b8ffce3fb2209e2c6e258286982e02357a12f7df5daf2df0013af31ace2a5" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.inferential []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointReasonsExample [])))", + "sha256": "c224d6fd8d50802cf08feb6f03c519161f4161cbcc1ccb85aca1d428bab6507e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `outside\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 2451398637) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 33)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 2451398637) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 57)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])))))))", + "sha256": "c551de35323f24746aadf22a6611ebacdb1cb94e8b4395566041cea3514158ab" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 3849707129) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 28)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 3849707129) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 45)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))", + "sha256": "9d56436068f437ca82a13d660b482c2c010378472a97d87202c93c58cc14f534" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])))))", + "sha256": "7e3fa4592c2b19d90c2f858f7168ded7b64f30e40cf7c0232ac87752ced3204c" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))", + "sha256": "f0ef7c27557eaa39351f56c8807f56428d4b3bf3e7adfcd888ebd0ecd2ec64a4" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.letE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.actualOutcome []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.actualOutcome []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))))\n true)\n true", + "sha256": "a0bb99242c31620ee4c5b6e988883f3aa22b64126ffee1e765f5520bda35f61f" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))))", + "sha256": "a92288aebed02e0acbf848f44ff85a32e40821fecafc92bb8ce7dcb89a31c74e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContractEvidence []))", + "sha256": "43406d330c84bc09d691acee59de1fc29de6234aeb88fe44733b301b919f3fd7" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ScopedApplicationEvidence []))", + "sha256": "a527a2020908a813787d377f4918c57975e27b6bd8d6449e15be34c05c40489e" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `certificate\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessorId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 42)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 42))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessedId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 7)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 7))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessorId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessedId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ProcessGrounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))", + "sha256": "fe5654cff59f9fdd8d2c45b06fb9c074424a4dc98b3f9131c1fbce46b08f9cee" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `kind\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.InventoryKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ops\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `op\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Available [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAppend.hAppend [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instHAppendOfAppend [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instAppend [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Available [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "c42372dbdafd2e978ce5040103e18e2e8a26326e3f9eae43e2c902e076ab5d23" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `req\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `i\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "5e18307d2fd827fe08aa1e168caa706d5bcd1aa43c40eec1b7c6ff91b81e66f0" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.conventional [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.established [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.convention [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))", + "sha256": "ac0033fbed40e31d070cb960495ad45eb8726534475c7329dca05c8da8f6a1e5" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityArticulation [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.AssessmentAccurate []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `selected\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.successor []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.PolicyIndependenceExample [])", + "sha256": "eee90ae5540da7b23ad95176b6a736267b8b4ef0e9413bed8e5045fb71acaddc" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `candidate\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Feasible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.implementation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity [])))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason []))", + "sha256": "f3437f4015fdbcf92e04b7da7b29f047b90d4189c21e558d82314ff75051b319" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))", + "sha256": "e536339546398c5b31cb38c3a821354d883487b067c95607379060c352460ccd" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.explanation []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.applicability []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.procedure []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))))))", + "sha256": "1ec7968d246d20d2b1493c1e285053ff3d37fd3fc2c90aa7ce1af6fd73464926" + }, + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.successorImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))", + "sha256": "50e8d5c0a1072c29f5281a230d2329b8e7c22f8abc90a8222f7689c81806b65d" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedHeld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.context [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))))", + "sha256": "3aab586ee7ffced9c73f73f9eef729d01d47a6bbb0df57d834248a6b2a439e0f" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capability [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))", + "sha256": "42bfb4a096464e6d78e2b2fab189eab062eccc80015fff1c83d501d91b7f5a0b" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.GroundsProvision [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.limits [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.relevantCriticism [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive []))))))", + "sha256": "84129ee9e21d37bed63d1ba724e180ef0d35eaa8a3301454c50137e2e2ba682d" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.form [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.principleForm [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.mode [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.governance [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.review [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.review [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))))", + "sha256": "1ec61cc64f16f1a54396b2b73da6f7aa90251e6563d882b8f92b3af2d8128151" + }, + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownRules [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))))", + "sha256": "c6ba911bc5b6a702eeddb7e1c345e58c099b2032b097a36768b315f016ea31a6" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.costAllowanceRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capability []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))))", + "sha256": "27e83eb0e659bf4c081cd29c507d09939dc4a07b00996d95f03220f991771f25" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `req\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `contract\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `applicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.rules []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.work []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `Membership.mem\n [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero), Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `Membership.mem\n [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero), Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 9))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 5) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetArticulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 5) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "651f3b9c399a82d84279c623426939d6383c20da613db99958f86c454866fef3" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.relevantCriticism [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive [])))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)", + "sha256": "6323d4f56fb47c305d52b3f61a3fd8086550b60929520138401ced1e161120f8" + }, + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAdd.hAdd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instHAdd [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instAddNat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))))", + "sha256": "6909f108bbe2e4fd72181deb801b653071f204ab688a8a4cc7e99c4ede0d2728" + }, + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation": { + "type": "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))))", + "sha256": "8c23f5b979f61d621e8ee78193561d5f1251459dc992801be540bee18948150e" + } + }, + "build_returncode": 0, + "audit_returncode": 0, + "kernel_passed": true +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log b/lean/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c5f899f --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/lake-build.log @@ -0,0 +1,10 @@ +✔ [2/9] Built CoreReader.Logic (216ms) +✔ [3/9] Built CoreReader.Reflexivity (559ms) +✔ [4/9] Built CoreReader.Agency (402ms) +✔ [5/9] Built CoreReader.Evidence (424ms) +✔ [6/9] Built CoreReader.Choice (306ms) +✔ [7/9] Built CoreReader.Integration (457ms) +✔ [8/9] Built CoreReader (202ms) +Build completed successfully (9 jobs). +info: core_reproof: no previous manifest, creating one from scratch +info: toolchain not updated; already up-to-date diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log b/lean/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log new file mode 100644 index 0000000..b8fb491 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/lean-audit.log @@ -0,0 +1,554 @@ +CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness : + ∃ s w, + CoreReader.Logic.Admissible (CoreReader.Integration.systemHeld s) (CoreReader.Integration.systemContext s) w ∧ + CoreReader.Integration.Charter s w ∧ + CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty s w [CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet] ∧ + CoreReader.Integration.systemCapability s w ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice s.requirements (s.method.realize w) CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason ∧ + (∀ (c : CoreReader.Integration.Commitment), + CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim c) + CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet c) + [CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet c]) ∧ + s = CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem ∧ w = CoreReader.Integration.actual +'CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemHeld []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.systemCapability []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Method.realize [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))" +CoreReader.Agency.Generative (p : CoreReader.Agency.Policy) : Prop +'CoreReader.Agency.Generative' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.Generative "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation : + CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy.permitsVersion 0 1 ∧ + 0 ≠ 1 ∧ ¬CoreReader.Agency.Generative CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy +'CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.permitsVersion [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.neutralPolicy []))))" +CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers (p : CoreReader.Agency.Policy) (h : CoreReader.Agency.Generative p) + (k : CoreReader.Agency.FormKind) (v : Nat) (hc : p.current { kind := k, version := v }) : + p.revisable { kind := k, version := v } +'CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.FormKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `v\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hc\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.current []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.revisable []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress : + CoreReader.Agency.Generative CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy ∧ + (∀ (k : CoreReader.Agency.FormKind), CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy.revisable { kind := k, version := 0 }) ∧ + ∀ (t : Nat), ¬CoreReader.Agency.Expanded (CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace t) (CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace (t + 1)) +'CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.FormKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.revisable [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.stableTrace [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAdd.hAdd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instHAdd [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instAddNat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))" +CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits : + CoreReader.Agency.Generative CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.policy ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.policy.permitsVersion 0 0 ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Agency.Expanded CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current.inventory.length < CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState.inventory.length ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current.abstractionLayers.length < + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState.abstractionLayers.length ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current.vocabulary.length < + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState.vocabulary.length ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.execute CoreReader.Agency.availableResources = some 6 ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.execute + (have __src := CoreReader.Agency.availableResources; + { experience := none, knowledge := __src.knowledge, collaborator := __src.collaborator }) = + none ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.execute + (have __src := CoreReader.Agency.availableResources; + { experience := __src.experience, knowledge := none, collaborator := __src.collaborator }) = + none ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.execute + (have __src := CoreReader.Agency.availableResources; + { experience := __src.experience, knowledge := __src.knowledge, collaborator := none }) = + none ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.execute + { experience := none, knowledge := none, collaborator := none } = + none ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Agency.Expanded CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.stableAction = CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.requirementsMet + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.withinBudget + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.withinBudget CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.StableReason CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement = + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.report CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState + CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor 0 1 ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.owner = + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.owner ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.before = + CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem.current ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.after = + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.reportedNewOperation = + CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.input = 0 ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.expectedOutput = 1 ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.claim ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Agency.Expanded + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.before + CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement.after +'CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Policy.permitsVersion [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.policy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.inventory [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.inventory [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.abstractionLayers [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.abstractionLayers [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LT.lt [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLTNat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.vocabulary [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State.vocabulary [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.some [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 66)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.knowledge [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.collaborator [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 85)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.experience [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.collaborator [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `__src.«_@».CoreReader.Agency 2099545508) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 104)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.availableResources [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.experience [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.knowledge [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n true)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.execute [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ExternalResources.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Option.none [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.requirementsMet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.withinBudget [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.stableAction [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.withinBudget [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.StableReason [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.report [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.owner [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.owner [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.before [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.GeneratingSystem.current [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.generatingSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.State []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.after [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedState [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.reportedNewOperation\n [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation.successor [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.input [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.expectedOutput\n [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat [])\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Expanded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.before [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Announcement.after [])\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `CoreReader.Agency.inflatedAnnouncement\n []))))))))))))))))))))))))))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability {W : Type} (achievement : CoreReader.Logic.Claim W) + (articulations : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W → CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W)) : Prop +'CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `achievement\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actualApplicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport {W : Type} (achievement : CoreReader.Logic.Claim W) + (records : List (CoreReader.Evidence.Record W)) (actual : W) + (reliableHere : CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible records actual) + (support : CoreReader.Evidence.Supports records achievement) : + achievement actual ∧ CoreReader.Evidence.ConcreteAchievementExample +'CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `achievement\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actual\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `reliableHere\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `And []) (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ConcreteAchievementExample []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency {W Q : Type} (t : CoreReader.Logic.Theory W) (c : CoreReader.Logic.Context W Q) + (inhabited : ∃ w, CoreReader.Logic.Admissible t c w) : CoreReader.Logic.Consistent t c +'CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Theory []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `inhabited\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict : + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable (CoreReader.Logic.singleton CoreReader.Logic.premiseP) ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable (CoreReader.Logic.singleton CoreReader.Logic.premiseRule) ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable (CoreReader.Logic.singleton CoreReader.Logic.premiseNotQ) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable CoreReader.Logic.jointTheory +'CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseP []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseRule []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.premiseNotQ []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.jointTheory [])))))" +CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse : + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable (CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice 0) ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable (CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice 1) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable + (CoreReader.Logic.union (CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice 0) (CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice 1)) +'CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.revisionSlice [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))))" +CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences : + (CoreReader.Logic.Consequence CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext true) () true ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Consequence CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext false) () false) ∧ + (CoreReader.Logic.Consequence CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext true) () true ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Consequence CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext false) () false) ∧ + (CoreReader.Logic.Consequence CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext true) () true ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Consequence CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext false) () false) ∧ + (∀ (b : Bool), + ∃ w, CoreReader.Logic.Admissible CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ (b : Bool), + ∃ w, CoreReader.Logic.Admissible CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext b) w) ∧ + ∀ (b : Bool), + ∃ w, CoreReader.Logic.Admissible CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext b) w +'CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit.unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Admissible []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))" +CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported {W Q : Type} (a b : CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) + (changed : ¬CoreReader.Logic.SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) + (h : CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport a b reported) : reported = true +'CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `reported\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `changed\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.SameContent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot.revisionIdentity [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Snapshot.revisionIdentity []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant {W : Type} (p q r : CoreReader.Logic.Claim W) : + CoreReader.Logic.union (CoreReader.Logic.singleton p) (CoreReader.Logic.singleton q) r ↔ + CoreReader.Logic.union (CoreReader.Logic.singleton q) (CoreReader.Logic.singleton p) r +'CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `r\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected : + ¬CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext true)) + (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext false)) false ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext true)) + (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext false)) false ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext true)) + (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext false)) false ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext true)) + (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext true) 1) false ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext true)) + (CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext false)) true ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Models (CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext false).assumptions true +'CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.meaningContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.scopeContext []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.contextSnapshot [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context.assumptions [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Unit []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.assumptionContext [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))))))" +CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction : (∃ budget, 4 ≤ budget ∧ budget ≤ 6) ∧ ¬(fun n => 4 ≤ n) = fun n => n ≤ 6 +'CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `budget\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE `n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []) (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero)) (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 4)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `LE.le [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instLENat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 6)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))" +CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange {W Q : Type} (t : CoreReader.Logic.Theory W) (c : CoreReader.Logic.Context W Q) + (q : Q) (positive : CoreReader.Logic.Consequence t c q true) (negative : CoreReader.Logic.Consequence t c q false) : + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Consistent t c +'CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `Q\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `t\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Theory []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Context []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `positive\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `negative\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consequence []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse : + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable (CoreReader.Logic.singleton fun w => w = true) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Models (CoreReader.Logic.singleton fun w => w = true) false +'CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))" +CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete : + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory ∧ + (¬CoreReader.Logic.Entails CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory fun w => w = true) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Entails CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory fun w => w ≠ true +'CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))" +CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive (owner : Nat) (rules : List CoreReader.Agency.Principle) + (records : List CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord) : Prop +'CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption (owner : Nat) (rules : List CoreReader.Agency.Principle) + (records : List CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord) (h : CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive owner rules records) + (rule : CoreReader.Agency.Principle) (hr : rule ∈ rules) (s : CoreReader.Agency.Subject) (hs : s.owner = owner) + (ha : rule.applicable s) : CoreReader.Agency.Performed records s rule.activity +'CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rule\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hr\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Membership.mem [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `hs\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ha\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.applicable []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.activity []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained (owner : Nat) (rules : List CoreReader.Agency.Principle) + (records : List CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord) : + (CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive owner rules records → CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope owner rules records) ∧ + (CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope owner rules records ↔ + ∀ (rule : CoreReader.Agency.Principle), + rule ∈ rules → + ∀ (s : CoreReader.Agency.Subject), + s.owner = owner → ¬rule.applicable s ∨ CoreReader.Agency.Performed records s rule.activity) ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive 0 [CoreReader.Agency.applicationRule] CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Agency.Performed CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork (CoreReader.Agency.Subject.system 0) + CoreReader.Agency.Activity.assessment +'CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `owner\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rules\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ReflexiveScope []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `rule\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Membership.mem [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.applicable [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle.activity [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationRule []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Principle []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Performed [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.applicationWork []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Subject.system [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Activity.assessment []))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve : + CoreReader.Agency.selfTest [1] = true ∧ + CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false ∧ ¬∀ (n : Nat), CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple n = true +'CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.selfTest [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownArithmeticPrinciple []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport : + CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator 0 0 = true ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator 0 1 = false ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] (CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.OwnedRevisionExample +'CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OwnedRevisionExample []))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds {W : Type} (claim : CoreReader.Logic.Claim W) + (articulations : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W → CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W)) : Prop +'CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `claim\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `actualApplicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening {W : Type} (records : List (CoreReader.Evidence.Record W)) + (p q : CoreReader.Logic.Claim W) (support : CoreReader.Evidence.Supports records p) (weaker : ∀ (w : W), p w → q w) : + CoreReader.Evidence.Supports records q +'CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `q\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `weaker\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction {W X : Type} (records : List (CoreReader.Evidence.Record W)) (p : W → X → Prop) + (wide narrow : X → Prop) (included : ∀ (x : X), narrow x → wide x) + (support : CoreReader.Evidence.Supports records fun w => ∀ (x : X), wide x → p w x) : + CoreReader.Evidence.Supports records fun w => ∀ (x : X), narrow x → p w x +'CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `X\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `records\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `p\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `wide\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `narrow\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3)\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `included\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 1) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `support\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 6) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 4) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 7) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2)) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion {W : Type} (a b : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W → Prop) : + (CoreReader.Evidence.Duties fun f => a f ∨ b f) ↔ CoreReader.Evidence.Duties a ∧ CoreReader.Evidence.Duties b +'CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Or []) (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 2) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 1) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Duties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive {W : Type} (xs ys : List String) (a : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet W → Prop) : + CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties xs a ↔ CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties ys a +'CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `W\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `xs\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ys\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.implicit)" +CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility : + CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties [] fun f => + f = CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical ∨ + f = CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition +'CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.LabeledDuties []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `String [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Or [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition []))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport : + CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Entails CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument.assumptions fun w => w = true +'CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation.assumptions []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.uninformativeArgument [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport : + CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord.test (true, false) = true ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord, CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord] + (true, false) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord, CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord] + (true, true) ∧ + (¬CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord] fun w => w.snd = true) ∧ + (¬CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord, CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord] + fun w => w.snd = true) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord, CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord] + (true, 0) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord, CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord] + (true, 3) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord] + CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord, CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord] + CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition +'CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record.test [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.temperatureRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.actionRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))))))))" +CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment : + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable + (CoreReader.Logic.union CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory (CoreReader.Logic.singleton fun w => w = true)) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Entails CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory fun w => w = true +'CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.union []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason : + (CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition.commitment true ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition) ∧ + (CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition.commitment (true, 0) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition.consequence (true, 0) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition +'CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.unsupportedPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.Position [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.reasons [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.Position [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.consequence [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.mk [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.BudgetWorld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.announcementPosition [])))" +CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof : + CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition.starting ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Entails CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition.commitment ∧ + (CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure CoreReader.Evidence.contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure CoreReader.Evidence.impossibleAdoptionPosition +'CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Satisfiable []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.starting []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.emptyTheory []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.oppositePosition [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.contradictoryStartingPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.impossibleAdoptionPosition [])))))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons : + CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged + (CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.inferential (CoreReader.Logic.singleton fun w => w = true) fun w => w = true) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged (CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.JointReasonsExample +'CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.inferential []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.singleton []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.value []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchPosition []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointReasonsExample [])))" +CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal : + (∃ outside, outside ≠ 0) ∧ + (CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] fun x => true) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] (CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator 0) ∧ + (CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue fun x => true) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue (CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue +'CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `outside\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 2451398637) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 33)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 2451398637) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 57)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])))))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference : + (∀ (n : Nat), n = 0 → (fun x => true) n = CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator 0 n) ∧ + (fun x => true) 1 ≠ CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator 0 1 +'CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 3849707129) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 28)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n (Lean.Name.mkNum (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkStr (Lean.Name.mkNum `x.«_@».CoreReader.Evidence 3849707129) \"_hygCtx\") \"_hyg\") 45)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.localGenerator [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation : + [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord].length = 1 ∧ + (∃ f, CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] f) ∧ + (CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] fun f => f 0 = true) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord] CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue +'CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.length [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Supports [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.zeroRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool [])\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.allTrue [])))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain : + CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet = false +'CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false []))" +CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound : + have a := { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 1, recordedOutcome := 1 }; + have b := { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 2, recordedOutcome := 2 }; + CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced a b ∧ + a.actualOutcome ≠ b.actualOutcome ∧ CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded a ∧ CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded b +'CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound "Lean.Expr.letE\n `a\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.letE\n `b\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.actualOutcome []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.actualOutcome []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))))\n true)\n true" +CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability : + (CoreReader.Evidence.Verified { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 1, recordedOutcome := 1 } ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Verified { setting := 1, actualOutcome := 1, recordedOutcome := 1 } ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 1, recordedOutcome := 1 } + { setting := 1, actualOutcome := 1, recordedOutcome := 1 }) ∧ + (CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 1, recordedOutcome := 1 } + { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 3, recordedOutcome := 2 } ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Verified { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 3, recordedOutcome := 2 } ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 3, recordedOutcome := 2 }) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 1, recordedOutcome := 1 } ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 2, recordedOutcome := 0 } ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Verified { setting := 0, actualOutcome := 2, recordedOutcome := 0 } +'CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Reproduced [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Bounded [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Verified [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Trial.mk [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 2)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))))))" +CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation : + CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContractEvidence +'CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContractEvidence []))" +CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer : + (CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬(CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess)) ∧ + (CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.ScopedApplicationEvidence +'CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.explainedProcess []))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ScopedApplicationEvidence []))" +CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment : + (∃ certificate, + certificate.assessorId = 42 ∧ + certificate.assessedId = 7 ∧ + certificate.assessorId ≠ certificate.assessedId ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.ProcessGrounds CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess +'CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Exists [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `certificate\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessorId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 42)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 42))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessedId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 7)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 7))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessorId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExternalCertificate.assessedId [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ProcessGrounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.OutputContract [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ExplanationContract [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.outputOnlyProcess []))))" +CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability (kind : CoreReader.Agency.InventoryKind) + (ops : List CoreReader.Agency.Operation) (op : CoreReader.Agency.Operation) : + CoreReader.Agency.Available + (List.map (fun x => { kind := kind, content := x }) ops ++ List.map (fun x => { kind := kind, content := x }) ops) + op ↔ + CoreReader.Agency.Available (List.map (fun x => { kind := kind, content := x }) ops) op +'CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `kind\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.InventoryKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `ops\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `op\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Available [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAppend.hAppend [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `instHAppendOfAppend [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instAppend [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Available [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.map [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Operation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Item.mk []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails (req : CoreReader.Choice.Requirements) (i : CoreReader.Choice.Implementation) + (k : CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind) : ¬CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice req i [CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status k] +'CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `req\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `i\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `k\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason : + CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl.established = true ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + [CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.convention, + CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output] +'CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.conventional [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.established [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.convention [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))" +CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice : + (CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated CoreReader.Choice.priorityArticulation ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ (selected : CoreReader.Choice.Candidate), CoreReader.Logic.Models CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts selected) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.successor ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.Entails CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + [CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing]) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.PolicyIndependenceExample +'CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityArticulation [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.AssessmentAccurate []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `selected\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Models [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.successor []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Entails [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.statusFacts []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.priorityClaim []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))))))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.PolicyIndependenceExample [])" +CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible : + (∀ (candidate : CoreReader.Choice.Candidate), + CoreReader.Choice.Feasible CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements (CoreReader.Choice.implementation candidate) ↔ + candidate = CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason +'CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `candidate\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Iff [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Feasible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.implementation []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate.identity [])))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason []))" +CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal : + (∀ (x : Nat), x = 0 → CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl.run x = CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero.run x) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl.run 1 ≠ CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero.run 1 +'CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `x\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.changedOutsideZero []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))" +CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons : + CoreReader.Choice.Relevant CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + (CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.explanation) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.Relevant CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + (CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.applicability) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.Relevant CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + (CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.Relevant CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + (CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.procedure) ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.Relevant CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor + (CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity) ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor + [CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity] +'CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons' does not depend on any axioms +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.explanation []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.applicability []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.procedure []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Relevant [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.cheapSuccessor []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.simplicity [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))))))" +CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent : + CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl + CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl.run 0 ≠ CoreReader.Choice.successorImpl.run 0 +'CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.objectiveReason [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Ne [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation.run [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.successorImpl []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))" +CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency : + CoreReader.Integration.Charter CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.Consistent CoreReader.Integration.revisedHeld CoreReader.Integration.context ∧ + CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot + true ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot + false +'CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Consistent [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedHeld []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.context [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.TruthfulReport [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Question []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.initialSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.revisedSnapshot []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))))" +CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded : + CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem CoreReader.Integration.actual + [CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet] ∧ + CoreReader.Integration.capability CoreReader.Integration.actual +'CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.OwnCapabilityDuty [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capability [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))" +CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment : + CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds (fun w => CoreReader.Integration.GroundsProvision w.snd) + CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds) + [CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds] ∧ + (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds).limits + CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds).relevantCriticism + CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure + (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds + CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive) +'CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.GroundsProvision [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Prod.snd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Candidate []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.limits [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.relevantCriticism [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment.grounds []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive []))))))" +CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged : + (CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem CoreReader.Integration.actual).form = + CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem.principleForm ∧ + (CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem CoreReader.Integration.actual).mode = + CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem.governance CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements + (CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem + CoreReader.Integration.actual).implementation + [CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing] ∧ + CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements + (CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem + CoreReader.Integration.actual).implementation + [CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output] ∧ + (CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem + CoreReader.Integration.actual).review + 0 = + 1 ∧ + (CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem + CoreReader.Integration.actual).review + 1 = + 0 +'CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Form []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.form [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.principleForm [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.mode [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.governance [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.status [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.StatusKind.standing [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.JustifiedChoice [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.proposalRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason.method [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.MethodReason.output [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Reason [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.review [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.PhilosophyMethod.review [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.currentPhilosophy [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))))))" +CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity : + CoreReader.Agency.Generative CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive 0 (CoreReader.Agency.ownRules 0) [] +'CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Generative [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.openPolicy [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.ownRules [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 0))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.WorkRecord []))))" +CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds : + CoreReader.Integration.Charter CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [CoreReader.Integration.costAllowanceRecord] CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds CoreReader.Integration.capability CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet) + [CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet] +'CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Charter [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Compatible [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.costAllowanceRecord []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Record [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capability []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.unsupportedCapabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))))" +CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties (s : CoreReader.Integration.System) (w : CoreReader.Integration.World) + (req : CoreReader.Choice.Requirements) + (contract : CoreReader.Choice.Requirements → CoreReader.Choice.Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : + CoreReader.Evidence.Facet CoreReader.Integration.World → + CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation CoreReader.Integration.World) + (applicable : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet CoreReader.Integration.World → Prop) + (facets : List (CoreReader.Evidence.Facet CoreReader.Integration.World)) + (h : CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties s w req contract articulations applicable facets) : + CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (∀ (f : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet CoreReader.Integration.World), applicable f → f ∈ facets) ∧ + ∀ (f : CoreReader.Evidence.Facet CoreReader.Integration.World), + f ∈ facets → + f.claim = CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim s req contract ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated (articulations f) ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.FacetArticulated (articulations f) f ∧ CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged f +'CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `s\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `w\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `req\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `contract\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Requirements [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.Implementation [])\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `articulations\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `applicable\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.sort (Lean.Level.zero))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `facets\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `h\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 5))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 4))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive [])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.owner []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.rules []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.System.work []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 3) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `Membership.mem\n [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero), Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 3))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.forallE\n (Lean.Name.mkNum `a._@._internal._hyg 0)\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const\n `Membership.mem\n [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero), Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.instMembership [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 2))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Logic.Claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet.claim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 9))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 7))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 6))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Articulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 5) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetArticulated [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.bvar 5) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments (c : CoreReader.Integration.Commitment) : + CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim c) CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet c) [CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet c] ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition c) ∧ + (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure + (CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor c CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive) +'CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments' depends on axioms: [propext, Classical.choice, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments "Lean.Expr.forallE\n `c\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Commitment [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentClaim []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 1)))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentFacet []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.JointAdoption [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValuePosition.relevantCriticism [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPosition []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0)))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.ValueProcedure [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.commitmentPositionFor []) (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.Mode.waive [])))))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)" +CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment : + CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds (fun n => n + 1 = 3) CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet) [CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet] ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet = false ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical ∧ + CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical = true +'CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment' depends on axioms: [propext] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `n\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `HAdd.hAdd [Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero, Lean.Level.zero])\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instHAdd [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `instAddNat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 1))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `OfNat.ofNat [Lean.Level.zero]) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `instOfNatNat []) (Lean.Expr.lit (Lean.Literal.natVal 3)))))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Nat []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.arithmeticFacet [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.false [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.FacetDischarged []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)]) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.usesObservation []) (Lean.Expr.const `Bool []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.switchEmpirical [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `Bool.true []))))" +CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation : + CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem CoreReader.Integration.actual + CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements CoreReader.Integration.outputContract + CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet) + [CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet] ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem + CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements CoreReader.Integration.outputContract + CoreReader.Integration.actual ∧ + ¬CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds + (CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem + CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements CoreReader.Integration.outputContract) + CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet) + [CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet] +'CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation' depends on axioms: [propext, Quot.sound] +ORGANON_TYPE CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation "Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.ApplicationDuties [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Choice.identityRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.capabilityFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `And [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actual []))))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Not [])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.applicationClaim [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.actualSystem []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.successorRequirements []))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.outputContract [])))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.canonicalArticulation [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.lam\n `f\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `Eq [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero))])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.bvar 0))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet []))\n (Lean.BinderInfo.default)))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.cons [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.changedObjectiveFacet []))\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `List.nil [Lean.Level.succ (Lean.Level.zero)])\n (Lean.Expr.app\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Evidence.Facet [])\n (Lean.Expr.const `CoreReader.Integration.World [])))))))" diff --git a/lean/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json b/lean/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3214ff9 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/evidence/manuscript-check.json @@ -0,0 +1,521 @@ +{ + "passed": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "current_source": "current", + "current_baseline": "not_selected", + "errors": [], + "entries": [ + { + "id": "organon.preamble.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable", + "context_only": true + }, + { + "id": "organon.preamble.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p1", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.limits.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "incomplete", + "effective_status": "incomplete" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "kernel": "not_checked", + "reported_fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reported_status": "not_applicable", + "effective_status": "not_applicable" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p2", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p3", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.terms.p1", + "kernel": "passed", + "reported_fidelity": "partial", + "reported_status": "limited", + "effective_status": "limited" + } + ], + "manifest_sha256": "fbadb527c043cd26fd81b06b6ea76c16731ec56ca6b91b5bcc3329cfcf1d73ce", + "proof_targets": { + "sha256": "2400383120ab2d98454597a73cdcaaadf45b8e47b18a646118708dc5d81da2a4", + "complete": true, + "semantic_status": "not_evaluated", + "entries": [ + { + "id": "T01", + "kind": "boundary", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [] + }, + { + "id": "T02", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T03", + "kind": "specification", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T04", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T05", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T06", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T07", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T08", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency", + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T09", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T10", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T11", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction", + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T12", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T13", + "kind": "specification", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T14", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption", + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained", + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T15", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T16", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T17", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T18", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T19", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T20", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T21", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer", + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment", + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T22", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails", + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T23", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T24", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible", + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal", + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons", + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T25", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T26", + "kind": "nonentailment", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T27", + "kind": "theorem", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments" + ] + }, + { + "id": "T28", + "kind": "satisfiability", + "reported_status": "accepted", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ] + } + ] + } +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d7a0677 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader.lean @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +import CoreReader.Integration diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c5f9f59 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean @@ -0,0 +1,286 @@ +import CoreReader.Reflexivity + +namespace CoreReader.Agency + +inductive FormKind | organization | method | principle | appearance | artifact + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +structure Form where + kind : FormKind + version : Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Aim | expandUnderstandingAndConstruction | preserveSafeOperation + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A policy records an adopted valuation, current forms, and permission. It does not assert that valuation is correct or enacted. -/ +structure Policy where + worthPursuing : Aim → Prop + current : Form → Prop + revisable : Form → Prop + permitsVersion : Nat → Nat → Prop + +/- The normative specification keeps valuation and revisability separate from realized transitions. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.Generative +organon.charter.overview#p2 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.charter.overview#p3 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1 sha256 f4ca590e2ae15e3882f70c7b2bc46a8911c97cee547c8b137b5493fbf862c8c0 +organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1 sha256 7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf +organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 sha256 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8 +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +-/ +def Generative (p : Policy) : Prop := + p.worthPursuing .expandUnderstandingAndConstruction ∧ + ∀ f, p.current f → p.revisable f + +def openPolicy : Policy where + worthPursuing a := a = .expandUnderstandingAndConstruction ∨ a = .preserveSafeOperation + current f := f.version = 0 + revisable _ := True + permitsVersion _ _ := True + +def neutralPolicy : Policy := { openPolicy with worthPursuing := fun _ => False } + +/- Permitting a real version change does not supply an adopted value position. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation +organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1 sha256 7f9b85c0816b3d69e417cf3cbe17b7b59931388f84d799ce6730c998037358bf +-/ +theorem permissionNotValuation : + neutralPolicy.permitsVersion 0 1 ∧ (0 : Nat) ≠ 1 ∧ ¬ Generative neutralPolicy := by + simp [neutralPolicy, openPolicy, Generative] + +/- This is an explicit consequence of the adopted specification, not evidence of actual revision. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers +organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 sha256 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8 +organon.relationships.terms#p1 sha256 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1 +-/ +theorem revisabilityCovers (p : Policy) (h : Generative p) (k : FormKind) (v : Nat) + (hc : p.current ⟨k, v⟩) : p.revisable ⟨k, v⟩ := h.2 _ hc + +inductive Operation | copy | successor + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def Operation.run : Operation → Nat → Nat + | .copy, n => n + | .successor, n => n + 1 + +inductive InventoryKind | document | term | tool | artifact + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +structure Item where + kind : InventoryKind + content : Operation + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- Available represented operations are the contents present, not their number of occurrences. -/ +def Available (xs : List Item) (op : Operation) : Prop := + ∃ item ∈ xs, item.content = op + +/- Duplicating any inventory category preserves exactly the represented operation content. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem inventoryNotCapability (kind : InventoryKind) (ops : List Operation) (op : Operation) : + Available ((ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x) ++ (ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x)) op ↔ + Available (ops.map fun x => Item.mk kind x) op := by + simp only [Available, List.mem_append] + constructor + · rintro ⟨x, hx | hx, hop⟩ <;> exact ⟨x, hx, hop⟩ + · rintro ⟨x, hx, hop⟩ + exact ⟨x, Or.inl hx, hop⟩ + +structure State where + understood : List Operation + constructed : List Operation + inventory : List Item + abstractionLayers : List Operation + vocabulary : List Operation + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A gain must identify an operation newly understood or constructed; this is a disclosed finite capability representation. -/ +def Expanded (before after : State) : Prop := + (∃ op, op ∈ after.understood ∧ op ∉ before.understood) ∨ + (∃ op, op ∈ after.constructed ∧ op ∉ before.constructed) + +def baseState : State := + ⟨[.copy], [.copy], [⟨.artifact, .copy⟩], [.copy], [.copy]⟩ + +def inflatedState : State := + { baseState with + inventory := baseState.inventory ++ baseState.inventory + abstractionLayers := [.copy, .copy] + vocabulary := [.copy, .copy] } + +def stableTrace (_time : Nat) : State := baseState + +/- A revisable policy can govern an unchanged trace; no improvement is hidden in revisability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress +organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1 sha256 4ae4497523e79e0606ab3849c47b6ea16f8888a952e063e6966eb36b750f3df8 +organon.relationships.terms#p1 sha256 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1 +-/ +theorem revisionWithoutProgress : + Generative openPolicy ∧ + (∀ k : FormKind, openPolicy.revisable ⟨k, 0⟩) ∧ + (∀ t, ¬ Expanded (stableTrace t) (stableTrace (t + 1))) := by + simp [Generative, openPolicy, stableTrace, Expanded] + +structure ExternalResources where + experience : Option Nat + knowledge : Option Nat + collaborator : Option Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- This interpreter actually needs all three external inputs to produce the modeled result. -/ +def assistedExecution (r : ExternalResources) : Option Nat := do + let e ← r.experience + let k ← r.knowledge + let c ← r.collaborator + pure (Operation.copy.run (e + k + c)) + +def availableResources : ExternalResources := ⟨some 1, some 2, some 3⟩ + +/- Stability has a concrete stated reason in this workload: preserve its operation while staying within the one-item budget. -/ +def StableReason (before proposed : State) : Prop := + before.constructed = proposed.constructed ∧ + before.inventory.length ≤ 1 ∧ ¬ proposed.inventory.length ≤ 1 + +/- The policy, current capabilities, execution interface and workload constraints belong to one generating system. -/ +structure GeneratingSystem where + owner : Nat + policy : Policy + current : State + execute : ExternalResources → Option Nat + applicationBudget : Nat + requiredOperations : List Operation +/- The modeled system uses the assisted interpreter under a one-item budget and a copy-operation requirement. -/ +def generatingSystem : GeneratingSystem where + owner := 0 + policy := openPolicy + current := baseState + execute := assistedExecution + applicationBudget := 1 + requiredOperations := [.copy] +/- A stable action retains this system's own current state. -/ +def GeneratingSystem.stableAction (system : GeneratingSystem) : State := system.current +def GeneratingSystem.requirementsMet (system : GeneratingSystem) (state : State) : Prop := + ∀ operation, operation ∈ system.requiredOperations → operation ∈ state.constructed +def GeneratingSystem.withinBudget (system : GeneratingSystem) (state : State) : Prop := + state.inventory.length ≤ system.applicationBudget +/- An expansion report identifies the actual before/after states and the operation/performance it asserts was added. -/ +structure Announcement where + owner : Nat + before : State + after : State + reportedNewOperation : Operation + input : Nat + expectedOutput : Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr +/- Reports are generated by this system and identify its actual current state as their baseline. -/ +def GeneratingSystem.report (system : GeneratingSystem) (after : State) + (operation : Operation) (input expectedOutput : Nat) : Announcement := + ⟨system.owner, system.current, after, operation, input, expectedOutput⟩ +/- Report content is interpreted against those very states and the named operation's actual behavior. -/ +def Announcement.claim (report : Announcement) : Prop := + report.reportedNewOperation ∈ report.after.constructed ∧ + report.reportedNewOperation ∉ report.before.constructed ∧ + report.reportedNewOperation.run report.input = report.expectedOutput +/- A true report of this form entails a represented construction expansion. -/ +theorem announcementClaimImpliesExpansion (report : Announcement) (h : report.claim) : + Expanded report.before report.after := Or.inr ⟨report.reportedNewOperation, h.1, h.2.1⟩ +/- This concrete self-report asserts a successor operation for the actual inventory-only inflation. -/ +def inflatedAnnouncement : Announcement := generatingSystem.report inflatedState .successor 0 1 +/- The report asserts a real successor result but its named operation is absent from its own after-state. -/ +theorem inflatedAnnouncementRefuted : + inflatedAnnouncement.before = baseState ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.after = inflatedState ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.reportedNewOperation = .successor ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.input = 0 ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.expectedOutput = 1 ∧ + ¬ inflatedAnnouncement.claim ∧ ¬ Expanded inflatedAnnouncement.before inflatedAnnouncement.after := by + simp [inflatedAnnouncement, GeneratingSystem.report, generatingSystem, Announcement.claim, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + +/- These transitions share one initial state; only extension adds an actual new operation. -/ +inductive TransitionCase | inflate | extend + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def extendedState : State := + { baseState with understood := [.copy, .successor], constructed := [.copy, .successor] } +def transitionBefore (_transition : TransitionCase) : State := baseState +def transitionAfter : TransitionCase → State + | .inflate => inflatedState + | .extend => extendedState +/- Both alternatives are assessed under the same concrete input condition. -/ +def transitionInput (_transition : TransitionCase) : Nat := 0 +def transitionAnnouncement (transition : TransitionCase) : Announcement := + generatingSystem.report (transitionAfter transition) .successor (transitionInput transition) 1 + +/- Eleven boundary branches share a content-bearing trace and executable dependency model. They do not assert a universal law of human capability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +-/ +theorem generationLimits : + Generative generatingSystem.policy ∧ + generatingSystem.policy.permitsVersion 0 0 ∧ + ¬ Expanded generatingSystem.current inflatedState ∧ + generatingSystem.current.inventory.length < inflatedState.inventory.length ∧ + generatingSystem.current.abstractionLayers.length < inflatedState.abstractionLayers.length ∧ + generatingSystem.current.vocabulary.length < inflatedState.vocabulary.length ∧ + generatingSystem.execute availableResources = some 6 ∧ + generatingSystem.execute { availableResources with experience := none } = none ∧ + generatingSystem.execute { availableResources with knowledge := none } = none ∧ + generatingSystem.execute { availableResources with collaborator := none } = none ∧ + generatingSystem.execute ⟨none, none, none⟩ = none ∧ + ¬ Expanded generatingSystem.current generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + generatingSystem.stableAction = generatingSystem.current ∧ + generatingSystem.requirementsMet generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + generatingSystem.withinBudget generatingSystem.stableAction ∧ + ¬ generatingSystem.withinBudget inflatedState ∧ + StableReason generatingSystem.current inflatedState ∧ + (inflatedAnnouncement = generatingSystem.report inflatedState .successor 0 1 ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.owner = generatingSystem.owner ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.before = generatingSystem.current ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.after = inflatedState ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.reportedNewOperation = .successor ∧ + inflatedAnnouncement.input = 0 ∧ inflatedAnnouncement.expectedOutput = 1 ∧ + ¬ inflatedAnnouncement.claim ∧ ¬ Expanded inflatedAnnouncement.before inflatedAnnouncement.after) := by + simp [generatingSystem, GeneratingSystem.stableAction, GeneratingSystem.requirementsMet, + GeneratingSystem.withinBudget, GeneratingSystem.report, Generative, openPolicy, Expanded, + baseState, inflatedState, assistedExecution, availableResources, Operation.run, + StableReason, inflatedAnnouncement, Announcement.claim] + +/- The empty work log omits an actually applicable system assessment despite an open generative policy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem generationNotReflexivity : + Generative openPolicy ∧ ¬ Reflexive 0 (ownRules 0) [] := by + constructor + · simp [Generative, openPolicy] + · intro h + have bad := noSelfExemption 0 (ownRules 0) [] h (assessingRule 0) (by simp [ownRules]) + (.system 0) rfl (by simp [assessingRule, ownSubjects]) + simp [Performed] at bad + +/- The same proposed arithmetic principle is used in the self-test and in the universal correctness claim. -/ +def ownArithmeticPrinciple (n : Nat) : Bool := decide (n + 1 = 2 * n) + +def selfTest (samples : List Nat) : Bool := samples.all ownArithmeticPrinciple + +/- A genuine evaluation on the selected sample succeeds, while the same principle fails at zero. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem selfTestDoesNotProve : + selfTest [1] = true ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false ∧ + ¬ (∀ n, ownArithmeticPrinciple n = true) := by + constructor + · decide + constructor + · decide + · intro h + have bad := h 0 + contradiction + +end CoreReader.Agency diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Agency.olean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Agency.olean new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..8eed5e0dabb7da9b6c104f3f970b471850e1fe22 GIT binary patch literal 1358104 zcmb4sbwE_<_xCUiVULZqj*X3tJ?g5Xt~xgMAR#EiNGR&6V`Jl5xE3}x*2=Dhjg5_s zu7R$BwPL^b+~<5Qmr?iod+#59xX+2_ob%Lqo_psS66EI{taYeetyZmSH8elIJZseV ztWkGBO+OFsS_AxRd(`pvuU*I6uZ~YWZ~vOL>(}u0^sh6(&#$gV^T+1%Wi^`Agp)Fo zMhA`Ny%Vbj>iE7*a9}w9sWE7@4ic|?Sy)euf6g6AH-9Qhg>I6jC@v?ZxU!aK5~RQ0 zqaL6m3v~(ig}6ptZwl-8h(7r1@~OSA6BFszI0(Pg^-87xLLV@W#2dh*=t>E`?RLNalYJ{M*OI`e(Afqub0Bg75qiDCH! z*wab!XJe~g#6fyWu^iCA_kqD-;XnKN1p0ap2=Z$=v}I(tUudv*P-nlekcdzpzc6N# zf$B+xeyxbt+LP6+4R7qoO$<~I>;s}d`1<*@9LmZ_kBQ|27{hB<%2y!IAN8Rp8}kBP z`M$q3G$h2of0nLH`l4A+Jfk62H(|l*&jq0mb^y^|+JyTJVbz)}{y7T&dgQEPu95$b z+Ry_#fM^$=kl=8?VA0h{k2}ko7-Re7n>r+E&Ijm$UqI+<6%sn6U0`r#=amH1c15$k z`<|UVeHs;w{9pRKL&F38y?vB1Nc^NPk@chkGfE7(`F86{=tI8+!p_cq{y~0`fy4ZW zkuSA<9y$@X)YXOE4t(fYo>-_~@p%u)fPln>$S07!}&dh zT{^6m!$o?b2bhQThKG6whXsZQh6FeBm%6lEs@9jn`Ye8lsWX$llqLq!2S0&mmu5cU zfx`mBdBllI)cV|=gx|gEtX*-}y?;aK%OzMfz?^*V6CM)UGAM9J*AZ4Fl%&s#^+YmS zO8D%!JKk0u`p_Og*xAu4hcP6W^%JP=OJaTR$_?+kZ@jTD^kF;zF)n;UtctIsCxhkP zoQ0p+p5C`5n%|Fy9{2^s{1+BD(yya`|1hhc53$M@=`*q(3!|;#+yaxUp8b;;s2wnW z0AXL3aPM#gOzmGh>sfNYTfbx54|n=sdP4ntIwDr2CxzuR7!z|fI<;f@%pmB=M}J5c z5dHYSCQP+`Mi&vcLA~nTsy5d3H0dHgv918MM3Al_g9XyRq$iT)V;FngD&Md5vdJfi zPI?e`AmSe!(jp|-KO#&T2*fI1q%V>6q%vA^$ItPOziK9i|BAmkz&q@F@%L~Q{=IwD zXMzZ6(y&)qCH(YaJ&}x-SM7H8Y4nF29ZXhQ z#JZ5g`cnJl+J9oJCO^?hAM64`Z(#5+X*v%HRR#g;LqBoLCj51X*)ic<*P%WCmp*f7 zV6ac1H3+dIes%u{V119~{cS5)y~qO4W4IjcRI2u;(%EwS-39f@3$Jto#5@z?-@!Y) zKg}|2eC0)g>qC4~SnmqY++lf6+%!QS)-xc+pE)EbP@Qie4{*;e;^4F??Ur+k8O2Bs z`DNyE^w+y@s&4yGG;k>Dft^6~+h)PRArZkoenYUBvOd%o&3ea_9h}cF_-iusVcrKK z9)6M1%oFbC+c6^C8o{fe-2YimD&vYtmnwXjtD6sf=m$W%epZwCaH;#5M-CB>gUz07 zcRIQ65b^w1KN}zoC-t00{OW#TV|@<8j+e^NYhsB``d|+b?bRh>z#z$CV#}f@ne|lo zQher%jzKMmPI@2*M0-(qm+K3!}qt zIp3Of<-QR8zx?u%;uOX+Ht9*=^*fIBjB9l;W>-JmS=58|O6likmw&ym>+(OS2Yv#b zh#*~o!Gp5osjyd{OZdH_yIac2ikIZ^N%mr%1!5kN((`W?WU?FUyBGA8|9oxU`xBIQb=N55DYW`0^&PQ*WKp(~l5dG3O#3w>MmWiMA8Cj2ov1dfvwvE>3mh}-m z8gy>oyUTv9d$R733#bqC1rYJ~wpyi$D(lKZ`Y`V$vtEa$k;^VeUm6a3Ft202y42&J zoF`8o>|GfFo=c_EVS?e@3dTV7=S=-;Va|3^;;&BnmZ@^Ve}8}bT2v0r_*q~GC+ z5wk9$e)tK5zuf+Hhz}R(GqOGl7>Ukzlf73QWqBe82W(FOZ}v?pEdM< zwM!)Ht$F>0t+v)6PxCZB(0_sG$Dxu=HeK#d@hqRr=$H3FmwY!j$jv}{FiwGJXK8cd z6Tm}){LEl^w}QgY0SlU?4ZQd;ES09DNG(1g2wuGyZzEOM_g}W`K@)74zo!2JLPSTebf-(aC@L;8pq?D0c|y z-X~;;v{?!F>o`2PM@Z=4{-OWl+{dkuh|8I+F{{eu-q#!Yu|5GYKlTp`9AfQXqkm0e zQG0C(0P`UdPJ;|=V0mtii4cw9IFVY~# z59f2d?_XJKR(RCr!JCOr{$oA?VqTHjOFqb<{!F}d$@Xx(-Q9%$6AY6*`wnX+4}&cB za31$})M0Jq^|gCJ9_Je9pDm6C_1}^{|2Waf9yj_!x`3ER?8a4=<2kAq>tF)g<>R9( z6tH4*8tEc>I+vp#O?aO(_^!6)T%uFGm=A!M7t}jywf`PPg#U-H9eXf&$(wlS!Mp^- zIghl@AQt%|JsQqCBB7^E;5y$XPIrib=-4-4J#Z|&Vfu&tYvufu?8UeRB3^cJ`ra|2 ztRL}8<@$ZO`wNncFF~ z#D|OY1+cy-#t9{7dH&YkAdkWSOI+0p4(UTXr?9@OH@2FaRo^(8>Lj{rap4!@I?>~J zV9f?!EkvjKFb;sohop5kB$Q_c(u4iEiS@17e7HinH>1Kx57Dh$j{I`<&cadcTi%k} zkLp2ufQS>$%}Ea~(ue(BJnKCY-#>0`uf?InL;5iOfEb6;IWW}7cH!JgQ$oZ+H^Ne* z%pUUu=t2GlL>`BJtnM&m7vgPVeLZ%)c3zwN>O#^-^hhp8ymdu3-MO>)wvw0SW9xu8 zcSe2R8_?={6IlQ1&z`|wHjizCda?h;d3V{id6wvo7g5#$_y>fas{J+P1+sPO`aFIT zar?Pwn{t&;_{S0h#UJw#5aZ5ne#-LrORd+&dXM}*zeT-+AE%LCqT`%LY4_h-R64V3 z`CinE_6DNen`ItL$$HRE8C;KN?A#L$TiaGfJ%*CPFU-I9$1M2g{ltA&Q4jJ3Ao2!0 z-%>v?Q~PCMy{k)>aX(wcQ;t8;t-P*cJ-F`^FtpObyRA_l@=Ra>B1o5AJk`@`7C)1@ zUMI8Vc#?aC?j%d~!cVN{EmKXi%f}B=;(&3D@v$a-jyCU(kE0;(Y7lY4Il;ViswhvtM2}*5oO`S}zxwX=A?_Z~kNqF=@S_(>ZGZRl!8y=j zKh|TX3a)JnJj}HRbmWhaUsJh_@zL$0)j`KPi*v)Hb32xqoqF^E=S9_L8#&pBt2oSlBYCohL2k8>K>-|Ew!n-BfwbPV!{ zAL!0)es6X9WxZ6QJ4oXU`yn9uJq;}4p^NH4e@|n3x8G^s^k}2ezkseUE&RazF!_Yv z!Ju~=j)D$5(N8Al+G2S1w9r1#k*6Y#53Amp`S`-r8bl{MF+PBp=aFa1jKnNmWG~_# z&35@~_vd}|$;(J|(g%4U){B;rR_|b6KVRa*rS?CS^)0{cHF3t%fkTOh==w6kf2>c( zLjQ5Bf9|QWj+bF&z|wp#J#Uce>n2qh8Wt}7B|X?~7VIlMg9{4}jgZd1GI!;o9`si; z*EeO*(e_dEd}Clo440!nl|MJ`OY!wjCV-Cj4A37x?pXi%a+OWXK~G_M%p?8>-p#2I z-`YlWiW}xDAlhSCh>!Pxh#+tE12BpU&PmV|i`oBkW2S43Oh-KrW=yMl zdEO{x-m=)~KOdoq`}enjYoXs}r@!vuef2j~vw49Y%XB=)AL_Y#z@WcN%KHPU&L8JD z5y7NFzR1r+)|1M(wN3Nx+VhS5iGk>@(&QkW(@Cdastvx{{z$IRWzD&Tx5LNF=^yFC_ynRI1_y@> z5AyRJ=tmXvMf$M6PGWtnYm{sg(f_kNU6DQ~<^^KCkj{f^s`a29-P}bST9?>+Gj+|{ zSHwg0AP>WOG3C$JQ@r}`k0Sbi*&QCzBFi&s=)-xcjq6+Y-g)!PBS&^apS)m7H$cP} zd9nK7SsmA8)@RaBDb%EQ?Xsv(Q&ISZJpA~3s_9tO8M5e=kd}z zQqokHx#XzpH*!74E1qt+x7>}Eq=x92?~q?U%KKNyj0YZaa}wRc=e8IpE_M4p`1Nw1 z-Xu@)MZW@~fAlBwm%3e3*^hNMuHWx}F>WQ%Ne}uB5c5m3Vcvm3 zG-VMZU!)K7t$P&_7x#%4hqt90j3pMLN8vfNv!I)bU%hPH@me&l{4p_g{qy-g%f{$l+C zB43eSGo|OA#3uWJeAlh2@MF`A@+T`-`g<_wMlQ#>vir-LwVT}^U5n^c58?%BI=SC>ELYObKZcrJ(EQQO=akIsE31N9ZAKcovNZ?L3$<-I0pc((Ai zdJhPc*6k58tL!J*GoAH+y}#Tmq<)pH#6j_NuO|G*`FzrdXBW~By$&Ec`HA@$hJ6j{Nu4j4`cFeqC*Z zdHdCUEHFQ=EQMmGT+=K`QdHC)!O>hUDG zqmn-u_du-YQffAYbkHT+!Ffv>+gs&DjLV(nE!Tjq_YnTU&Zw>R- z(cV}Oe{}9>X1&)YEOOq zBI|ootk>Wxbsx&}KGDZ$0~*Y$AATK~dtCH{PlT`|7IggYZ2KLlNw&zRmOvDn`H zQ;tQ$PV{#m`js@!`DjqgDbR=h6i`FNdtTi~%lzMcXbO4^mm@Ayf9_tqNXB4C(3N)L z`88YB5snuZX3jep|3J(G((A%Q0>kLFP-!CQ?j01N8krO)*p=#O}cB--;(chrYTvPa2d-|T`uVzNPgC907ho6C)$2crmsY?VM`()%JQyU0Y%%GBy`FVM z99~=U#|CBFrR1#vT#kM|sB5(XwuwE4lLD#_;}nSTD$O6wLIcACr1t;=ee7N)R@WQH z`UkmnuJPATC#I2JqAU46KleRptQk{!>fUtFkw;;FH|@8_mF9N*;|b_Em&Lj>?b!Il z&)3=x1RZh2I=f+ewAZZTjoJ{M{6fA1M4mNFIw!-S7}<&S+*Vh_Z_qy%(>Ln0F{lU6 zEpV$9#F}gu~pAZBlv>o!UD;{UKezeBxFk`_EZtix6skCP+YfF@CJ5_sN%C zBgYoJL0m+~J`4SJU|BEFF}~3rL5n)K%;wpwKj_K)yd3l3rh@xA2jyI`A9TbGsx;eU;ZQFS=bR{Tg)azY)Kx7S{^1-g-R(9sM2e z@6U`$JiVsmHf7$%ct`&6tjgtPPKfugo_RES@UVZ$$Iy>`Eb7lSzt!%m zMgRO0bjahmS=AwL7%r4#KX^ZN|{G`~w@!uvnJFhiE9`iDu3sxQFdw0*E zw@UjUzIflc>cw-#;@&-34SD#7_mhW|Np9Pzd2(xeI@al#voF5v-({b&&L{ADaCo2g zOvr&F6aQ>IjpQAq{)y+LK=t!d>YxAXeOgUp(J$*v+G5OA=z+3d@Z@sz%MPo()~|~D zBu_6CH|#$#E@u@_t=V{Pf(d@b@wqJWf#+4~zD=6+I0bfNUj@Xxh5717&-D`6t`19M zJB?lQTzOuE^I)`d@aQus+dup)=c8mV&biQzXFGM)SJUr|g}qqk(GPNGZ#lk_`<;%U zqn&YHezvrAP?XD>7Vt;zP|^($c>wPliA^5wn2(~Gh`1lvweIlk@_)_(J)X<49tO8g znsWB|q!7?CU%`)AclKlp?^Z+c6Z-|MBWDk1)YO&Pw}9lSzo35rv5ryPRqqF>!!O&7 z^~YUT#}YZOSN#3D^Tv^>PTfcc$z$B3zw0eApQ=7eeGPg%|Go?T&YCjqRp&Vd zML*tKz&sY8a(}16_2YWTM{&PGJd!KXUcNtD05cZ~Di``#f)UE{36Zriitn=o{)4H9U z>S6@l!2K3+j2_U;>v7bRhM*_s5_;i}KCDYckKd;&>$LK_Dei~*9BWdCE;>{n^2jqW zf1AH*YgXP{d@kt7BatW6xEb3$VDD&Uen*~#@!iQhW9|8`%XC?H^R@JT%7~(2-}M zpP!$9t{LmX189y++6PCgeOD$fsQ-``=}Z<5A0~WaPfH1(SGP}otF7Mcgf$Y z3(={+V4VhHz4i$Sk{+LgNS`{${3(^XzXY@taXEjzXMVl^?bAMj<@^Cb9@&gD4Ae>rkT_)zV#SkUo&4bNpdUF|kJS6L@z zzkoPlpEa~a*rrN5wpV~W#ue7zp?^2+TF~W@ylSDPGtgfc`S1U5Q&> zInyBzI`aQ~#S0ebSLN0e(2>7K@q4xT5)RC8D0ZkM=;)V_ui0qN^&1VsYk-b;VqA7! zeW}pS?#^<*rg&lA0U~bLzt1-bqk4w=&%R*^o7LG;FF>6 zLqS*K#m@;ZDB=jT zkEaLgCs4;z-$vN~>U`bmPi#ewf{u78?c4ckrHDzP^1Ms&LOnpGKK>nyef!~eFgC8Q zrnBpxbCQ?K&zni#Pi!Bs1mD}Or{DW|mFy43Q!?uho%MS1+OdUB!yn|&nCE|Uet5Lm z9Id=Bp?Ki;6H0seU+LA+R9Ts4(Z8@?y)dkFne_YBm308|Qu<$|*jD|Wb4^73UVN^G z`Qz0??UFrfUdZbZ`H%JoV!jRmeN-E*Q-eaKgUd0DsW9JqOe^!kmQSTK$1Ro2UPJPt!9ugE`qr?Q?Q zufjarC87UEpNh4gkP4EAU5G=MjEk+7<=Qk8^f>H8{`vs-wgS%W-rzri*RpGbn+YfGa&N+0e=3{7p;g(*onNt^B3XgMekz`pN{zB z575&~h;rlw`CpBmJF>@(tDvL35&!)D13I2!M5kKU8JAM09 z*9G>S1v=IrwBybrk2=nqVtD|%vYzukVQ0Zw^Kw?+tpy$O@UOtM6tBl`dSrl({R7sg zt_$>u?vrd!L637~`}n!&n?pD6+_OG=3p)A-*4F|DwB!D4*`zt>m~YTNwVNL3n%K`l zIsek@vg!}dac#@7mQ9qr82drw@!_w>tt~&VUk}nx{TO)@5c_)M8$XBmg-K6B&7snn zG|A9K;}7$srlY98TTt^JWdd4^1s(kc<2S-I;7y%2$BTiE_vWy#ideE{SLYRPmAK&? z9dWsAS|8n3ckBYmlihmyL%M)i|AIrhNSRX0NWURg<)vb^y$Nh@or1e_AL(eVN;-&+ z`3C(wVnzO@oj0v62Rh=2{CEEEgL*%n_$C!}tm9bc3bv?_t9OC7ayyZ|m?wakFRXUo zkHNecU>0$$v!|Kuyy@|M)Dy$+ZJ@vJI;E@CyJB`_Jit!mpO-iGJL`ThO&O1vPY~C) zFFH>}A|uJf}}eTbdtSf}Afp$5s> z6FbjP=55HskGfjzxZRC*DD*_0Z*XqV{mPThy)XBa^GLOR$ajC8+&TQk^>oyaIH4Wt z#kVf`anawwpzC=($Go@DdNS1|;NM4}TlqW+aeAj|lk?#D7TZ8aJEQ&{MfUc4J}>Vn z&|`Sr!hW^Knm##?*0?5b$H;z+fArIZ^?QZne0pFh3ryi1S*kD_5UYTseN|rHjz7oRe}tDjeK_#fM|`e5M2YmkS3=pPF!#m{MMoV5#d%H;pX9gYfN2;TsH#&9w&9JhT8=&jEiE^AXq|EzpZ|VeBdA%XKU82~MW>@Adu!MCSc01yVDiB@jgBJyVn}$ zTy^>+yn#ICEv#2wovM1&y1bf^0I%55^oEaBc5(oHk%4oaM^%*bJHKv1y51W zZhV(&1>|{w{J=g7n2q)E^XG5gV@2H4Szp51qz?1;tbY zefi@4?W*1E=@<|1Yg~(Oa&OWh(3Nq@_VpaOVpZxcPRt%^Ly z1Abo*pZwe8t)1oL0+L5u&~6{xobRl=(p8>kC@wh90b(3Qh+npa;9F$&^?CFX@o2E7 zs&Qr8JIeVN_7_-38(e<+bd>q9yg#D)aDD+SPKu?=?mXjrkGJG_D)Rx?-#d2VrF?}4 zyd@oSdvQ7PguliWd-iV0*hZiu9vBA=F0`sQquGwuNORWx9mH)n-LxH zME~sF;aTY}m$FwOd9nxVI}rOYp5N)iFk$Wa^ha%vv9GY__NLtxJMEZM2KHFF9QG`( zkp9VVao{&PEY-qvBDEBiI>Z#VT@#+I7+>H+AO50RIA zihsRRxA;J1(2-|G^0{B5_u4rnsyvSX9rj_q+FL5%rpvFUu0*GJpq~KIUxrKbcVKYV zqd9f^r1lej-Fnol#pEaTl>L{!zbHrh+?=y|uRnt5Ll|01NAnd|C_UYBpG|SYMO(CDb@l)dHQ{13g zJ%20c7$=y=8ZF%2_2Gb~7l{6U=vSV^hfCeB+%3Ycy;G9w_V~NdGU8G9E7VtF^|V4> z`qG_=PW55F1EN3U`%pEAkuTDR=T^7p`-t4=P3 zVs*QuvEF@ggM#aP@Kol1thbo2KBx8C@#~s0RY?QME9XaZ5OwBouD84NaPFqu4Ekfy8oG$=oD9ZA(Q?F;`~f}_r=e* zgWqr^#U&ZKs9v1=83%~|@wsU0(i1uP|QHQuVP-L;_K zn6#0;hZg7;CVx-B?gd`51LNAwNBG&qz39Rnr%%e`MUHmub^A<3wi9HZvWCo|Eig<5+~&0m|uVDcIalscBy|u9{YTZ!!f1i z9(nk4wouS9|Du17sW_lVS+_2VJoc5Sf6Sbp@TFeLC84fBQDJMN0x4LB}}==DlUFW)?rb^!+T*kx!!^E!%&2>5i-G zI})ARSsn<|-$1Mr;yaFhzCZfClEzQOec71#-g!gXu10-`2lAhOO>bW5|NC$Y=$MBQ zk1=yAJZ(_H@fqkiw?cljY@lI&r6zNifR1=!U$pFa(xC1>CvSqT{JxdP#qBP>XP;jh z+yQjN3+MS?cF*dW>v8cA(9s_-AC)XS^Wn8pedO^@{SotBB(En;EBcOhI;v{|dE|%i z@9Wft69V4-rksn%@OLNBU&eO$Vw%>*N1jiqJuoi=kx$uucaW-+#|Oq&w7+PN1Kqc# zf9+$F(;l)H{$PH)lW$Sc+J$~U0eQ?r7+=d*HTlW>?u|STkUa7&jGwO`Kf3M-T7Hk@ zC42wX%aM`J;Tco4!VW8+A1U)c&$F2CT{(VnjL|&58*nbl&rLA@XYjo#o6w)Y=*syr z_8EG9U(3Q6<u1A(=6q(UadB!tdA8`97Y12dLrS9U2*<8RHqz-_h@4^}@bH#^}7_ z-h-bBn!dyYn4w^A507~={FeMyY2g~fd&V;Z9?f5*>@F_JNcQC~#J zc`?Q^CNko^17lIaXJN$q^67k!=iLdszPj^w#-bTh8F3!t&gaHBKgRP<9Y)1f>$1x@`rZKwmcYoX&0~n(i;~0||J^0+q z%xGmyWHf0-{5*KvCopC(n#u}#G-EttWO-2@!s|)m2UHjJMKQ)PCNX;O?_XmXjXWQ@^6xy|8BL4{j46yB z{5#E9#ze+cMh(CJXJEwpfQfvsug!5|%wTk@!*(;KGHU9Ia?I}rzBe*j7~>d|7}FR% z>Ir!>VNISK{~{@4*Hbna-HbsBb390~iw-QyDeQ1>L}CWVA4* zFyh=NgYVs1uwKR}#yG|##xzC^+vEDPkaK4=F-9@QF(xslF}k*7IYtv>45Pjk+rx43 z;CnNpl@Y&#P2~GjMonuWZ(uYsS{QANv5e`AdXtdzU<_b;Q+S@Sad|9bI-{|Tkc;Q_ z-GX~Yqk1)rJG${5WU&!}m~_A?^yjO2S$F+q>v`vgY(&NhYbGZ@`|5&RZLe76?o zTd`c8$cXPLr}Dj~J=?=*WVA5a7-JcuwSqs9?^78y9as;ekrCgu#qa)OI3Kbw-NqP; zd(6XppUN1;B)>Z_e3JQCExL^J2tv-AKO2xpNZV8@vU-kTsC{GzK^t?0sjA&cxR1nc6+7JI9!v03$5EtpuM6w->HS?@&K5Oh3<($vN<@k=~ z%73>{E}nEHnKY1m0Mqdu&27KzYi>KdOMV_8(X~-bzu}b8h-|*xr_c0e+Y{w;8nP45 zxqvRhG)@125d&LVswsdc5(Xfaovf5^f<8`P{;SAhyRrAO=o%i2;ui% z`_FbPKC%0D;vsuIxmn zX*|c#8Ab~K!B@LNi6T%S$vdU6oRRq|z490T35?LM#7TbOCzaJdHsPIfW%oOzLmkKJ zR3KgVvX^O7&7+BYJ}uSx!~UuKXKj*<+K)uGV|F>ejBNiNkn55DpJ&C-oq4zRq5#oF z@pT=Q)juki^y$)AkAdm;f4el7Xmk-B`%+e=S+u%MprFchCr_61V)QOnzW{hi9_tm# zZm(Nj5AyW?Qlo!{zM8X8;~^-LoKp3(zA1p0j!Dk-R}mj~#b~>u;iDZ37rr(U6*F>kHTeuwbHO1bQ zbz-`Q#?d8~<7{EHF@K-qE!sM>{lW{46b45Zn;m~F^N;d;vcp9WPJzVl#r+fdlbJul z(rY*75=a@O=;3@9@z9JG{u7T>_QP=%>Mu{JvMMQVN`Eu6eEUkDTQ{D#Ih`0Jx-OE- z(Z71nYHE^&1>Grz>F7TvYo9s}o2Xq9n2xw!9KNq4;x75^Y#-MY=Ks{S+d(G-Y7$8N z_HoT%{`k^MHamYCS7-aUx{ncYdNk)kVa$1`g~r)8ag~S^Zx8s%@==T=tJgSaV^#MQ ze~b$t=5KnRAN8r@pUm=+_d?EBh&_t;C3V;@Af`nJE_|<&*CFo*z3|K3%J`>#mBD)5 z#tOeZ8OK`tRDw*VK1U6n7l7u){KVs~am)dGFn%%KTG#7c%Yoxh?POnX9P5c15nKYf z0P3Z<+t*7p4~jmznt`Y+DA!I!)5<5EPUi`o^>ML_pb z$$Lt(TO{8@51#*nA1E}6es`Y5b z3IF4Yyk7Fx1eaCNgZ>6Yzxzdc8<}|MQtL6Xp0|7N-d*GLaU#=oRxZc7ZF6~9N){IK zI-GaI{{~&^wpP)dqFFwkao@C)OMz`p5q-gA71RwS(+F~ z5BvneU+INNUzI(|Jm)!H#BIdz)n{)F^SDGj>ih-%Qn^&W&cggQ#$-*r{EQKFoYTX% zz1#BqOEkJ9d8ZhbOJF?lEUF-QNk8^uDEnkOG)71Z`4pDRV4P*jQ3T_M^dru06NF#g zU&l7Z7?IXlN9bL0rPx2vOY?#o>+@teFUD={E(9ZnYJPW)e=?($`F}gT@HJwu=1=AR zZ{&3_miZ65_>4e~34R)f7G2iyoXq^hBl+;dcBb)>sV8$iGfWiv{@vGaQ^y_qK9Be!gcD45#GC=yxa6q7y8Mr>^$zZ)_t_|t;wO;2T z#6|khc0lxnA$~H8tc>h-pCsaAVodEd=9z8YqL#!!{nEGr{=@{SZ z9QU*y(`YqXs=jlMa_dxH{+WSuSTDjk)vtFl}KC7SHo-_yc8YT;W zFn%X?E?Zk|uaW7nH*ckjTh;a^vtA4H^`2YxB4S7W*ti_|?C`WUC6LDuJ(lTM4}W^; zRtote`3v8Hs9Vf*!cy`R<*BUi)IT+Hq)nUJmi<)nb&RW{i?YW-Mv~Wg@VPX~S~-}} z#WiH7X^Myw?DTol)Cuc0(cPIIz<9LNNiQw0>y)>npVnWRQcq)1>~@M`{y4^RE!>AV zX3}+d9tpd$mw0(rNYni5pg}HHt>gPT8l#|)J*liu6D90UD}E@(K}C1ta_kqX?rGCe zn@QKU7MV=)I=p89{SDnV z?G;qv7lL21)WP{0vm)n|zCEqQc45hEhHv@p*DJ#`5uc$2-3;0F-}2k9 zS7zqFc3Rf~eI8PhxE6B*l~Mj+zkX3U<*yp{)5iMZ850@NZ-}4r*Ay){UxS?fNS;bb|ceKhdMO+`xIkCJjW7V>-?kkIj4gwA#PT z{{%gW={R5fd^UZgwuF_^xOZD;t0;e0H-^BD%R3Kd~cNag_bk!w!8J7B;a{$x- zZ~ac|6vg&Nv7G0Hp6*(qn&Rb@z~xwPOT5i#5v?KeHShu*ShhbS0re}CXRyAwMi=)s zxapffbcy!E{J2|i;CJ_Z#@Ql{54#R}()&VW6xX8*;BwTr?eU%!M59ZxLx<;Kpr7rx z^}3+SQ; zZqb5&Mm0-b$bg^f%iwxEneV!8Mq4MYPi}v1Pqcpk^R>FyXTSZvh1LP&*;EJ3yY}-C zmD4(4?{!Y>356`S`YQV3BNX3rFZn@U7c7j(peAo$?nXTT5Q-{2j(N)bgBKo`^810 z%a^QnOaxUpVcmDzsTirjMg>-^@xiUZ>K~qM?74DhF?WI$ZpsPM1H0I zAAP9Z41AuTnJ4Vdw>MA!5|w@`MZQUNojaGqzAjZB%WEssolH!}d|YW$rHlz@RU;uumd-D*R>or1$TQj&4GORL2j;o4MOBf&M&L z$Y0o#&U(Dt&o0;eT&2OJiP}TY?GHZta?kl9PE=0uapQY4qviDMXR3D6;r(mqd-nUv zq9jWf`GtK}6w4cG850}~L>2S^E{|iZ7ISTc);*J+%zh*>y}kCyXI&;;hxeUO|BL;n z@n@F$T^9(yZUv>sIv6tbqkea$dzT*EOkIB(*K1<>^=;)toVb3P|E(NPjNbs}`#1J= zK4)$}QJYxr?8k2u^Y1)U?6r&C_@(y3_*I;el+pU&&iy5U<w{)tX1hwX zANHp%fg}Ao`YZ8K`je66o9%y7b}l7|Y2O+(Q<$#HU^>pVJlgD5dZ8rmAX(%In!;~FW3;v z`mVWdsLa+23kLBDJ3%VyG z(WQQ&HLLC^4?+HfeKzu^Y_-1riFKM}>5}YH`gM$p(0}L3yUyc}joNHa$M+T%-EP}! zWA$$G8GzhAe4dN(|8a8rJn%uSAK&Ag^Pt9z4{cUevDfdGP1L_~`~4LYtCW$y^QG4B z#?KAihi;klJ^lC&_Ro)#Pu6Z5E6)+?`tkn=f4=>7?`z)`FQ|TL94X`A-Gw0qG*&7V z?TzU#g z-o+y9#J|LEwd0Rt{|Mm991+y8!DUkH*?ex1Y6Yd}g*YRgcg(gi4y>2zk7s=WtS5%?W$)v6bK2=6e*1Bj z!2G?!JLJu!&ssn6Bfqe5J!#Cp^YQ2Ix$W``n%D5VJ?szMmWz0hX2~BN-p5B?xNXDU zA*%e(DS-Lm_oO8A&kml#E{aDK)6su?3pj7ks_1b{N4$DYss724>5@Or_VG$${>78b zWpi>KhA0rfeZ113Ki3P#T*^u)B#7TWUT(3%|3k%M*4W33=1;^6)!*)m>hSr!tQwvwZBs;U(YZnE#aYsOk7#``Z$$2j4pPL4MY* zrsMxlZoYl~=CVy5w6vGU_q$K;INJZc&b>F$$xf`}K%DDkem}kfvC5aazQ`3Kt_S?C zYn%7nBBuqU5Awk5EUWzg&zb77_?N``qFf_m2aL-8oWw{Uo(lqzf2hA#4wY*A+*S(v zS`6=9Zcw!jyPyy42tZ$_55Y?I^StbZ)JUn871`Nxlz6g)m$7bLWd;p z6wh*)=aV9DKh>(}$xO#Q-+9KO9gZq`B}s9=@d8k z1(eF02cRuP@_AnriKKeK=IS3;-O7sLAI`{$T=;PdqvT%Yp% z(lS!mKjZ0~Hn5T6md0}NJg*;WVm{+&C284SC)d?N4so+xG1b>Go$Q5uK=f;+|7Dt+ z#eWm)omi()=^NFYkD zXr51Ees{(+#+ic;cXEmqeE666BklM#YeZa9(|mt&js~YdSwF`W`aPI`#JP4h7h6_- zvJ;yFk4=LMYFM9KFYB?ed^F?me@Y&AwbMiV(cFJMST2tFgO7$+&1TJ7FY%k0AN?bR z`4j6;X_MU|_en*F_%nFk0Ke;65r;YL%6H9S{+2(^j^C5{UHccRpVRm)zn2|<0Q3KI zWYwu$9^dkN+VRIQ|FQ8=lXDxs<#)5=Phx)0vxPe3(SOUI!RrL_^9<%MKHOYT|DAk5 z?<(Sfe87Djj~^+D)W0zg0x=c?eU&h087Gk}f2YIDZZ*HAbRjOO-|J$z9C^iwvL%bF z^NK{KqrbFk+TpB2jHrX;@q0+fPipY=xLRHlC+voN9>1e`AW!`j8B9k$c5Ld}A?kcTf$47RMSN-n+!*Dgs^62#k&jKQl<}*x zitfd9dm4-?ec$DWUO;-wlFqZcFihdkVVr z+`_KjM3p?fXPe6R_IjWXs2DB%A=%-q*(Cg-a*5}MdCvfqpn9D)v3&JHZyw)U|8f?w z5#7q=c+Ow+N#E-gH|3OPMWRPD9nZOcpF6#?%k{W%kdJ3No^$`XwAY~qZsnUZU7O5w z{EldJwM)ZW-4A&N`E;h^Ie(MKJyzGudswkLkqx%NkU{5*mRiJrpci1W5d>E+JVTYLia45lN_GmYaiYHctU0Nrhi zhy&uh;n2NtC5|>3%XFu?X}?rX$WXOH4eM zXOHV7=#OD~Eh>;Mhq@S;w9_x+-3n+` z^faa;U#K>3L@xFI2m3ieX|>~zX8r;NPIbs;{8qo&jz5w4&!4zm@_Xl&vAkb~ zJ?YF}{ox-A?9VO9ew!V?VTXuM-qfZ0a_Yae$NqOxX69esZPsP%r6EP1+Q-KH z#3S`H9rhh~ZdK*@~v?Go=tLV{8$2dCsZ24yw6+NEm z$g8Ip{#xHPlkSkjc{Aog_s~*%17;0UzNeYa@|Xv0L8*Br{aN~qM!F>b9Q3<{|5*1L zHeB2Dox8R))3qK<&tIy!mdfHi_sl3(Ex()&ki41cmqCvgXxIRn7`}z=d6A18q>9ArXxN*PYrE5 zVMD!pkhd}&@tM}7NuF7L>$ZR%&2+@4?qAn_P8(m~H1x+aeIUo@;gp@47CZJS=dw8O zfq&Jetv#XFyf8z5I?KbqFYQ~^IW=zLd(ic}v$lWBp)cN#9p730?UB^JS`VhfzqPYX zYv;TwAwOf4+n?$1@9v-}*4GDj%5yBytxSi1J)ga9>f$)P1pJF;dLaAPwDi=0D>AC0 z|2m;vF+Qfx{%Jh+z0&;T9MAIU+z*oZe$|ZLe>mBwmduOzlQ|yXPiOvZSHc4^E+HZ7 zXT9JzB#3x59lWL&#wqwEf1Q$fyqTGA%*^rGve^U&>9b#NY|IyaZ_c~yy#7HS@!PLA zvCQ9m_~3duEa1%4Z@=CoGyl|euElc7y&_YF^xLmDnm>hqR|;UAM@Fy~Ve%t1|^q!eLzx_E+I`jYX^U2!w@0n4*#dle8?rYeWIW8pK zKg`pEeWhREvSZW_@P3Px<-=BgJbA4_`yIq0pC|n$^y2*%DwpJRG0dO9__W>dHR|?D z=5qMo#&g~vyk|oFCmr&mg#OPzoi43@&a7wuvCf2?TQS4Ii)xqack8kj{cYGYx&oa=`>!W?b_4I{8PWanx&KaiMoBrUOm&J8T=0pSnq?ecbdCAGcw{mH=mE559;e$U=iuFuGPhkNY3rLxz_ z%HYVA1GCx@L!mcK#b*qZ|9+bNd^&7-TUs=%qUN&p0Hun80Y9H$V_&pka zUxwcwmuVWG2wCE#OS=Ezb87mp?uP}2kH9lH;#b#iNEG$YuXU~Hq0l~inXWvC#QWlf zpFD|0z0{somc#te#AJS>p1-2)=*0#)4a59J_U5LFqzi~W6#ifAAiqqD)%GT{-d>OQ zuh}xZuB?OX!F-#}?b5Nxp|Myuh;BG2{Di&#zMtj^dx&ndqwhFcWxCEFtC!nD!*mNH z^7g#dH~fnIz2Fw@XJ$L&8Eq_Q@_FCN*#b_1R6pKxL%fIed|g@{?^KpYf2%fP?j0@X zB_xl2uQ|l+nSaI+M-?6V5ufK?t+KIuSc96b-AOP(KBa)0A_ zGMf1VN5dL_Z$T4 zBl;lOOZk3vz&?{-YoJ7MggPtL56;$z}+#IM1JYSK%Df`RCmN8n#0(}Pm5o$R%Lj@7+l zefhVCq=Dq4SbrSj%aY~yspp{pE>B{tTPE?XYi9jAeCHl@mf2S3CpJHee%Ir|zaguK zy-@2R#uf5`! zZbV=>3}=aAKJ5T z^Q+#F0YBM||AzxKca|d_I=?`D7@L?EC%u375$lRnuX28YdLvoSko#@A+V=-}UzkJK zhkB_#`8@-ci)BRHC-c3UpVrqjE+=^@K3Y6)#YYHNZ*3ZIJtG$9lFGR=@|sesUCKBb zNLtKqrqjYM_~}tIcq;N>n!oWJG=TY5E_$BkWRS(>`lI-{6YAg9-ur4d_ugjckL3NT z+j>#YzCxaVs^7oI`#iAkpM8dMjRx|Xc; zz3+0kGk+ALJIlGY%<Xd{L`X~4aPbGDbjC$PMF60yIVAyf<6m=>hJjfX3&q^&Wbn@54A6zE8)4&p}`GH zXe~km(F2$t=L#tuql!4H=uyxYCG@VWZHv;W=y6Pk{@@-3cRQ)*Np|{uZ>_8DtfHqe z9s8i2o=cWue?j)So)h(=|F)?RzSuQWUU@E4hXYXXr@sRp)USx=@5*}su(-mwWU~kks^5M*#xUQZfeH7s^SFjS;m_H-VIyL9FHEoawp%F2{Z(>dew-vapbMiefr`x7NkIc~jU#{Uwg+_+4q| z=7s}UAIVPSEMsiWVW&^=aebkH?C@YZ>?|HJ zAj|IxlVB(FSvO8?1zSiSzf-d^{n*>BO<*(8qanw5!x-?d6B|Hu#0kH@v)#LUR23&3 zzB7+9$2MW=@5|}%U3k#n?DAZ$_Aj05)n5{Eco?xNi+>(mj&|5MvFJLq1KF3%@@D4q z{Ii$4+J6tG!~WL$Q$t}3$y-@2nsHadFjsYa;#oeP>Aq8(4*sPS^UZ1dxP*%; ze(82}ul{3qxH4TDmRi_CMKsRr#|M>DzGdKc)?XHJ@?bPFs`XI5<;CSfKJz&R&S~-9 z`9JxqT*G-i@zN#vrNjTr1-;GdHCOiY=IJM_s`CqFALN!(@Qq$pE%4E^^ABMk{vQX}_qO`YO|tRAey0G|5BtLN z<~^*o5ATCSG2f=IzIn7pp@H%h`|pUwG2f741-9e7QgF-ha)Lgr_pREu3vp2CGqHRU zV+Lcwm}xg~J_&tPKi;QwXFj*9A`Y#Fj-Tsf0H;9W$2l9?*TnpW2Tw{ke>?vxzekMW z_K9Tvj-zhX`rdOW{C|IV4i(4zWC8UT{68^xE;2rH*HHCykqq#2zLj`>u0{Qv&n+cu ze|Y=Z&!$zKV|p?j@h#G6R24kulls69*Nw0dLxvz)lAX$Put?T-bAEKg_I-=seG*+P zm*Y8DxIVg(O5Q1v>DaHmHB?`UKByiSu=C04O{EiFLHa=k9j2b1h^wjZA{%-1|* zl+NWl=iv6^GlBVM7ppSa)m_+ye@Van_)KH|5!IeA$>s)5fy9sBzhZp4-4OAa`qICB zc4+}YpCbucH!wcc<+N_3@VGOvJlZ{y@74UYZbWlA>7{nI|NdYX?Xv+yql?-RekHRU z)|DGS9Vz^sbw!!i1I)so<|FU!sp0Za{uZ-TUnae*pckpLHf2+uV)FZLR3FawyhaJS zWhBQ%TS0k_Cae?v82%aC3BH!GM<2C&^8oKZDD_!-2>S9jwI_}l899-3kpK4ISxhda z+o00#lzdaj{XfROJTRu~eSc;$TPzX#*vB4Ai7EzFW2;b0P>ii62%(m#r9xFxN(V*k zv5!4!X|!l+X=5p|r`Ax~*kh|ywL)os_r2$NCnq=4&+mKx$jO}NdEfJ%_q=Dlckb{$ zY+;Yv9rbR(pt#Ed&i&!Y-&0Q;Bs}z*kmvd1{HwD)gCsm0IFBc{-l&@EdGAQzJRV%` zJ75{_uc&+vaPAjj&ixyCKSem-AB+dDZh`(kTjF%;MgC5L{ro-qB=DAv-uH!78Z$_M z`0?QL_?QNM@6gG+c)umI3%(P4H&Wd%!XHgHubdQM-<5MdI7{%t!M{`Uw;u!SyDWC- zO~JXN8~n@nOY{n`@5(dp$Ah0TdHM$d_Few>2Bd(;?+ti-ZD&G=oog!6K>Z~Pa{CvY zKStZ z3pSCTi+2L&c%S+B=0?7+P360RbG(n&MQ!Bg$Q6H@wecJWevz@``&-tzA9x-heKaq|p`LEY^Sl_3 z&oZCp#YE(jJo(9i`G@!AmLdJ*-yt%3+KYOyo^k&aQQsv5c_aTWA>)gFeuuY}s{XK> zLZ0KeSjw{3^%x(hd@Jw>qcDUa3!x+`D#l>u5%sMZ@n$*G5)RSowEK+wjX$zoxa!k{%;_EMSz#~X?$ira;kLE`cT_G z1XH_Zqn%|74+Kn7LdK4>DQpKPC{cs%g?DtmNaAxzgN<>p| zV-oVYyp1=$`iNCfd!zw(qn;~9c{r(8>1kQGsZ)-g-+r|BW*Eyx$-?l+MC(yy4VfRG+KdpKGu6#}q zfqd=`WK$^SeJ_v^!Vn_iadn+`cU z?0!~q-7vYn$-uLbu1q!0<948SwA~l=u+) zWx%rp9yhtZf%viDKYZqz7ij#{_B+x=nI(NDzV^MW*;7QliBHcT z*dK_`+TRmmUvo-)zLavzPRLOnjYGVy;@`pIeR-v(TUQ0xmmB$azFB{n)+c#7QtGL^ zKMnf1eTrcG+>n2C z9mQwf*WEAaxFMg%#WLS3c&Rt8)|Ss-6M%F3gnl)qlYIV~44lWSwApK}^7*SAAB;E3 zSMeM6KjD1tnGHSP*4o{i{Z6>;H(?i-|ML&6dhvKhxC1zkr)Ous{7gRgOov_6M}{`J>W_Sm{|jA}@irnyJ{EX7($cTS_m&KEiUV!?0M^LJ~Y z^Tn)!qI~XuRCDz?Aox8I@ke+d*^K5)OrUx$o6snvHvdY`{%^U>)elMoY5iQiIm5& zCM*A4!2OB!5ueAg4A||4oUY_ITmIKL#{P~6ziaw0ZT{Cd776_+;3tN}ngWeuN$?Ag zV_9sEVl?^3RbAAZ$FZj=9o+Ib=6oV>?$5tnZt#sfj=6zz`+Rh7=j(DmjswnqF1fT- z0l6P@d@vqgHo7zWpW=tdu@vZO|FZ4J>~|H{l;8Gg_7-^@)BPdr=W(pls?Qt9MQE~b@<%_c^=1n_$>2j97{$%$*bXAe9^kj z_9x<9$)xz=_pS4DGhbF;`w7dc{l_KvoHwifZ1o*Fq?6>`&=-d^d61(3FZ2laA)ntH z+->H?!TdZT;k?dE0q;zveXk`_Sge%!pZ8%SS_~Q_SgIZV^`7o8Vehrabq{~Jv8lS= z`(JuuGk4G9e&yefA<%!7W{axdGX9g*D zsTcVnRfCtcUg#pAoLfvRQ11ypKvd5>vMtMn!W!b#|PnI$mjbgyX_;3$R3n;VRA zfN=Ide=mPr)+zt-$d{_Y<=`vsFPblq{R1V_^IHJO*?j~aClyR zIQSeN+29}iw34-mJug30qd)AWuy2j+vAbw!UVhs0-1fV`zpKBYQ(rnKiO~G*EF}0G zZ(i_;M*igAZ(x6=b*%TDtXqQOn<9-%YqvdsZ z9OLhSc)VFR$m*3)>flUf-Ii$Ycnc6*Rt+1EJi5C^SdJS&ByeUmn zzQx$RW{`yQ`@OTkdv>8%V-s-dH%Z73{a2L3-vin9jlpC zeHOo~y=1?EzcfV}yynbLQ z;%ob_JxKWH@&19`3OJdWqu-?$@;amnhV)Jq@u>XGgX;m@#y+Q1M9#2M8ziN`-8x#Y19%uW^D%jWH^0%+a3!K~kY^kWj zLBQ31w^y`3+m{G_=ialf26_)q1n^X(&AV1QES=jKQ$lmc(~R`CAIk9*qp|1V`4SG< zUWY~agYDHHZWHjmL2R!Je4Fp(flD(!x z_}rc1*#_K&l;`gkGrRBLeY0qN5r4d%=l-`e--EmI_`r4~Lf>y?53JPrfo?KI8I;ue~3i34Yb6H)73BW{Q;jkqSTAf?czl_@#j}g^_|QA7m1T!laL>Sl%E&2J^WlbL_;A+KM!+9g;BB3pZ%Z)R z^?$XSCnhT3dzYR0g1_Sg!DdNAJLwO!TN9{OF7qH0Mx z-9z)YZ|i*G1I1f5%5y;8h4lTz>Skj+gpkPboCrA&_y%*=SW{eHK94KR_klmZ%Z_5& z^`#uoJny`BxnC!PQ|MLOWs(@@bOl9yQ_`Nl7bM|!8)S`(3#|q@f;h;FbBo{f>71OZ*u4iSK9lz;~P&UyHx5E@~&%2fi@Ffumm{sFP0ojUGoSothdtrobqJ~ciTpmSY|Nu>;Dx-~i^%W8 zibFp8uVIycr||o*NWTv_k2`;SG_iLG`X~8=-zUlIvJ~(a?RaNpAqQJ3QkAb+M`VD% z`7LKmXjqvB^kx4==Qg}9lk@5R zmlb~VK%UP^efTW%)%#z_C*?{#E!uWx`zw|FfVYxispW zpV*GDP~jJ1(ET+RK4<3_{e$giKF@!$YP!D`E9s$fw9oDG`97DE!sVC(m&4_0%gK<+ zq5AXtU--S5*?11@&bER!tq!uwr>%eCoch!IUlM|aJuJ)dJFwdN?)p$+4aK9j+*s)8 zfB8^Lt=}nLwB?c}^|=qo`H-@|)9{(?AU?%QCi3Ys^)nvl`T0frqr$^@J_r;aVMRoJ zi^aDo#OoZ=MVF$_zrIYvzN7r~Cx3UXT0ni~UcrqzjsFJpp0Qm>3wsivpT~u|m2OPe z+XX|l7dZR1N2mK+3=+=!kaX}`^gh2d2 zZMX7L0A~8_^Vi?@nuvppj&qjzzA1f#7*u~J^8M|yG%EM~IOykgi3^E1u17g){eiQ8 zs(v)JKerd*>A=}PpI!g-U!K1S=kum)@E)~UJCWCq(3bQ=jzuswK$n6QnfzV*YiAHvG=Th^iq4qq8$0RKRZVYdREtMc=Q z{Qc5c@PBwc@|yyhd4t9u-oNsGJ`sHKnBp&E)?30}J}(L1a&oo2zs&}p`$^YHjS}Vk zI{TU9=fQ8|+I55<3Z_D_xy!XHPsOmlD?3byFaHsCI#ktOTi=KVdjFPF#h{QkX- zqq#i76Cua;99-U{fkCoI+n-axA6fLTRUG$hPayjy zHc96f{M;AYfAh-OHEbWr$3TwlUzWMETaaYGw!eA7|9Qm3cD#R*?bp^fk?nf$)<-5g zGesJxzUkn9u=l6e%%QpYWN!p;t4-9m{+7j!EmD0Q$me$ZaY?E3R^U{gwm-VSZ~1kH z-n_r!QdPdDKgNPTIp*Hm`5es5sgJflCW3!){fpZ9m35qak$!D|Ob5T(zGXuS*kra? zH*5Q&wUqEf+3-Sz3u^i!&CA>${o}c!lIG=f^fL$Kd0vjeXPHm)avbu>BBdP+-dNF( zgZ`TPgz^ehuD$;L)UM5d>r=qz-(S~v78H4X25|npiOT2x{r=47pQ$ZH z`gNs6y zF~Qw`y!iugeFo~s{y9SCdTnD|S4PyI{WGhd=hE2ud%djR4!jX%DA&ZYud2RT z!K$bKseHzpQigIZt5I^S%Q3Sq{V(IqDMPuI4()m%xX1hIv+^?DO29fti`QQJI5^=R zeI(qmJ$L(``@3lIn{D+Mf$LLXAJ@;ja>JW%1UFa1Op(`TXzEwM+UD*v{Zn;mN&0nV zMg7~M{Nu5+mOQJ|_B8bSzhB1Bw|$%ZV!K*-VV}tfc|M1#Sa@kGL!3~i=r_56^Ek2k zP|d1A63+L74sQdlP{hbmel_|H1aGicgOAoC4fme||q>ys`9Mss6^y5~6)LZ{FyWUyv+a zYW<;~e|Pwu3PFkbq#QgBIG>a3)9;vSkZ>Px{(aWb%Z@DylJFGZ?El!lsV|KZo&lWK zdv}r#-!VzJuDqx}pU?Jgncmba;ZDfg!Bbu;GRY$0Y#*;9CinWxDBI_T9Jl|&MRj_} z_Qe6`b?((lQ9EV(e872Loi}iQsa*B}PeHmY(PX#6K4sju*kOMLaK4{Es8H+E!QhG3 z5bJz9;>CwlS3&rv<+^_P^ZA%5Qqu23|Kjt>aPS-LaUIPcpO+t};k&`#{MEOM3dH5* zyTRvuZ#?s7cdk>=lb7!VpZjYH_?^zZaD=$?@>4KAvi(`$-`m`v2|rK6QfhrQe7jxv zNB7~M`vW{zV~GQw?T-Y1*zO7^13Xt_af8qH$ARxn9&skXb2S#HhMxp}^!fo~13Xt_ zv1{zl0Kaa#S{t;_)zCUSzHsjT9a<6fRh**qZ=YSZ1_@6_K94Jdk3Q@gB;o16d0hGPMx_-- z3C{-3%aVMr!-O~9bJRLZXJEMoDW*3m~Y~VcZT)AQWv!I0A zDvSE_dj0PGoj---;CeoX=HD6H+bCh?H|3p&b;_l*pWX#|{++Qx70-6=c3_wKu06tI zf%EUE>9VY|-x%^>3*-$6z>DK|=8nELuwB)`d(?0t`DEZc@71oHujIXE_xQOEeL8TS z_tKBeFd^ zImRP^v%eSas6TzfOY<$@h8WV4boL^LsaTjp*_teEJ=X|($>jdD2Sm5k$ucy$${1_IC zdC858Cj)1Hm&|Htd-=(Wb*w)f_*D4&(&bv+&9yI02X112^7ytm?Zua}KY2^YDUZ{m zqdlWWkBuJGDSCWoPxR=hu|r3V{ z!~x&#gI)S~;Oy6j^XIp!=2$hC@g(5v*9z}d^IS=feg)i+2AutBJW@9Ci%%CWXZbAP z?AKZ$OI~ijvWxwu4-FG`vtJ*S$=~Se`s3ADe>m`I@N0w1WduQMlvcJ##61uBb^S#{|w*zN?r+hiCR?(1QU4R>$z}erHvNirpe|=^G z%e#TIzlYyE|K7`cU({ke4mkTeq0*>#c1&Ny?Pc%*=Pyf4I=8pX!7au7{^oI*{kd?f zcc<)6^??qhFis0o!O9gK>xmwy#Bt|wWAivx_N%U@@K3WbjazKJG^q#4s{J4N>{s8@ z&8=>g{i`>z#GeOWAcF{x*UhUVRunYH_}1n^fH z_M9*5m3F@4n2e-Iry9-yvr5w4!l&^=tQKVXp~)6x`JI&0=}? zWoGTZ%mx18t=EqicjwigqS>c-!H>v((WgXYUcOJmPX@npTEy0p&b<6M@OfXB3I4Ph z%`V!)^YY!`^S;bhN7UCHlUksZJuly>;YWZ!{N&B+r9<=b?Hc=I!T%(A{T#JZN+NXL zs@<0nO#3w__BDx+Pe)3)a=vQFl0GYOYRuH^?}8?6SVLU8D31N-A9Y22^ZyZF4?_mw zMo-z?`@?S<8`ZN*$Q!-gbK_^@Cw;CehkiHo#v!d(wBC1m5U6|~@)PF@J%@{oUo4ex zN&(LAt$I{@#DXA6-mz53@%OJI7PTrV%V%luYnA5yESIkf7xlIy4JjA*g{(gVnX_L(+?y{dkZryhv{U`M@Iz`G!=Yp@y>p<>`X_xi zYVnGcpZUmM5KLFI~P(52cC6KRoz54SxY-`-$XVHLLmk3jnBjqgK(Bs@lgdz<&zYXq*0*OpAwkH;e~_&cJORyXAx zFD$9x^Y_vd!C!S{{8^44VIA2Yq)XMrQ9Agh14y|6uzmPPO(6yOrO8gIogARHTGcoMuR$ z$q(+LqMls0v{~Xa@#(pp&^JUqZQyZVXFjLI=SwNa91c0kQ#jALk8#R!>cSj?ieLTv zrC7*s9KLV+IM2ukq7d#wKCd$`g@s=zUgg?-##4avI`e^V^~*=o>Re|$130fUcNVm+ zSvPUEzu)K@i25$LRX3e%?C)KB?e3wiBU#=Kocrz0I}I9t_3P|R#+|^q-@3b>h-~>Z z;uLU$8@Re~RWf_Gn^80-DD5HP)UI*B**_v*Z{+;6lDoFC50&%6pk%gZ#kxCuKVOmk zPk*Z$Zc?gTvcEH-C!$fK;JNMYEGC@#VQ53)4~~m8@RHlCj^XbE5SK3E^Lrwh9}f8^ zqbD6O@a9d>RX#r-$9mo14;nLLWRQkW@tTA<^udmJ@JS`ro6l@H<>yjIj%qb(*#?) z2Sp7S9^K}H|9oFS2K0x_eql=+((e$}N447_>c{oJ-Fi$iVRVsQDUfr3cdJCXlH7hI zpXtaw&eXr~r8<|fybE%%NE>G^onu7%ll}zc^ZD$yKOavuIn?6S@{@t{d{sMgMklj` zrvvBt>cGs~<@tRmG+t}tJR5vd+?)M9+e`9s5xMPbJgN2&lBG+*O|j6=@oSBk9Hh4s zDsUI@1f-P)Y&sKUSK(ap9N*q;o=bYHGf00j*dRJ+=Cm8*;?j`8qMkjuhmxUuJuQ-+*e>jtthJEOY*l`+*L42GVxzZ=W$p{e$BNO0Galj9)o_f#%oaQO*cdiXIo3*zX+r*r0j3v zQ`~rvPoEX+Kj-gp{rL$*wSD~Yk_7qDmn(JJaDBD<+#lJO9-utMuZGMogx`6;_jT2i z3+oN8=l{K%&{o23-tRTLHtM&kWh!qX`$#?5m8g@8q6cNT+B1hkb)XmrP>)Nx<2@>bH$^ ztM47`f36@6IPXUvS6t9M<@+amU&N3Fyf7(LuGofUUu=v$`ZN8n>@SV%x36b)Z^82w z?K{I;3%`85ZGwN_N&PYu`P?rfm^Wo!Pu|CnZo2+g`^Nl7`^H1xyoakMv}!p@?W2mH zj7fODUD2sti%L)9qcLg+|MywaA>X}|t%yEcaLH~v&QrZev%y<9c%c7W3#$J=cE8Rv zwf)(ih&IAsFHihxt7E#RlE`lD`AhdtLTj@EvYYQW#Y29=`u9)koq`d_?j-PD`}OuZ z1M0{6i0=WOhLoRE|GMU(N&%jWwby^yD zMe8>!ptln$@EGK0A$|2nzJ~I926(<>`9`i1c6r_jjS%$@NBW>;J2$_Ffc&bBw@C0d z9W9{e{kO12o!8CUc=Le&d{E6@f%f6rc=Lh3G=9d5K>KiQyrqHP{#nD~f%f4XZ|q;P zRo#bk+_e++=Y3H)KFfTX*CLQl@=Ck-?++a9Uib!aPY!BVWoi?v8u1FQ_kz#kdaJ?v zbjx}v?>G_i`b6M7t`8hFrP|NaH}?Z>NCnP|_s&&J@5D8A^wQ#uC_}lXn2r?LQvL(J zpYNA%Dq!7!>~2v#f9;b;KR?HQ{qpHQj{j~~my}dLF25DzJzq!7YWRD;()5vVeomk3 zUuET>FJrs*Q|CCf{_TZdx&E`JIR7Ym{F_f9uTKQd^*_<*i*cX!Xj+H$rvh(A8Ol{l zAEg_y;C8Ju zzYj0)3318(h<9?^A2E1L=@Bjd=60nYY!`1k3e8|}S~A#d;ke}^)ZD`wNG)}B7s z6X}0NzyJPCB;J$dT34zr&(DOXLY|+O+;^y?FUYM3D;MFJz@kX%lD@ZJo3p9zJH~U0nYU={M+lH zv;X+8GFhO=8@#}|{@*p;8P{g$a*hxG?`#R}KL_)7sg!O83C{%1 z&#V6Qv)dOW;nt3#-t4~`{{*ivN_ZG>e%^HMmT4_a67DQ3=4{_?(Gbjjz*%eQLyG2p)#-*S0= zcV2!b`Y*?S0{H8pb7XC3>7G5f3&&#)J^t-?>J->9_(9pd6OpNDjzZd+s|7g>Z*X}Gu>!ft7lk~_; z2A@7E{mbaBDAqT8PLzG~gnC8?++>Xu_H$gczf`Fd>!R@^3^+ee-lbcEa|Rzti}57_ zIQP$U3u}c0`Ba$7H^l(w{`uO~?EOXw_X6ks*(k}DYLf6o;M_ldUH#q=vxKJtXZsvq z9zAH0@J!%r-`fW3RI7wryNLR8|K2*g{k>ob4+GBqclsg6^n4N?0i65qBkNKM&D~i_?PmJZ|Km=+R@wjvDnJ?+HqT-rGgTdBbDZ9U?Ks-}-dq z^LDj4 zsF$sq@JsD;7YDq$Q}!rj5*~qk_V=`&4~jhc?i{b5^fAEM-}RdGSbVI5;}pw#fwR9$ zEUi4Y?BM}CzZw#Ov%gEf+3{~v(ek{$)29MwfA8|mEHmZlJAGJxCUExmpK)t`t5D~Q z?|~bv?}~aAg1`HZZgMX1?Lrd>Cx3A~a$0}@IdE@WSv{ z_|AxNZ!PJp-al5#_piq|{!UEY*g=lZSjh8ucc8o1Wb~1C;qT(&Umd4>e>-Y`5}r{5 z=>WAu)C6T{_z%A)L;n|pcK6tNr5UgD^;yVgzei7=^JLbn&2y+YYM0O+qTcNHF1<4= zC05v6kMVHe?DyU8*PAi4$149iKN2|m{lz2it5o9;M_Aqioc(@bw#8bh$D9g`#{*}- z7f`ZI&?} z2b}%cFKX74jvx450yp@8vp+|4c(%4{>5LsLp8}lyIj2CwPo2SsHZq<8oc(#@dHc`H z_x({wNy^6!1`@i=6yZTg>g~0vq3E_FI)hE3+=v8lv{kt9VS!fq0K0jagV28;^ zT5>LBon=k~kNIx!M^%`(nCEkrAifLnnt(JO{OT2o^s)GuDN^ExpZiS*#(*V$>{SMlDRUD(Y`krF>sv#!DCgVdHLFPb{6=HD*x7qzw^UV>U{;xI-4+Be`jL7ZSN!e6^WE^xe|9quU)L)c|3{=T@^*T>7uwyg?`>2de*g#*V_pdcqVXO ze>QmU%g+sV6;|bWU2E+t>~Gw{m=fd^IN6)_gD5`>X&88qI#r%(%-e33B=Gn>S`pwE z+dpwG-@g^w#eOqsxzHaA9{+B8rzejdneEKXv4`L1!Tw8xT=nlJce3PdXaBi#0{oB; zen^{35p)Wtmx`eF%tkx&`*p1SgkOk8?GdJVzs`@I^KDDgN}Y z6P%DAY%3Fad3Cb7ydXRV`Mge8(*JbCJ&RKI&RWjg7*;I?|H}J*i0lZc$-l|K{y>6Nm6DJFgzfYPBT-~53LJRXPy!iXc>+h1ha=+4lU#NX~ z+X&?;2lb-+nAwoq+->$i?yppDEPr&ILPR%Qh^l|7-kcv6CF=i02j{FRjvpQpLBWmu zybj-YYWMC~9halvCJ*GeU&VH5dqt1_BHzzqdB5IiA}*33|JtWhcguQHk9LoXF}dOK-6n=W6vW)gj#L2UiRste6}mC!mC8N{0PXg{ukpT3d#Dz zfX5&$)%L|*>He89=4@{Lr8`8wBkNDp=y%MU^qZ_d6*!N#wlk~VknA^Q0%yO!s$AfS zRKCdz+&WOy|Et^H{(S$A+AR$EJYHWMG3;;oz8U|{c?5W;Ttl|-eK93w@{A)KXPrk2 zAETZ9@#Te{N{`lFzdYd7VUB|&2Yb*Pg{m<dd$x-BX8*asfBuHINj_!%)AG}K{DXck_@Q+? zP4ioG^J%@3i1!fjeez`Rsr?n*&lM5%;*`gCdd@dGRvDv|OYxIG{;Y#V{TnQRW*u!;#PSW`1()CskO;n<9a8KX|4;=abvP1Dx9-Vu8iP?Lc;_Hxw0JoU*+mqDS@?(M)iE*f{4 zF-(qoCvc8i>yW#1T?ap3Lr-H*3Mh+5LRNgJ0w@WP+}YY)yF zmu78TrhuP+MzJdS!g9wA>DR_(7WkjeEn6Xf-ncYt=p&APN9eY5?{MdwGI{aT>SaoPJ!MJs@|L`p4JU#$rBr zZFln8+QY@0$Yk6(K;SRy?TR+sY^p9pWjvui)=Lxr@TGjW>anmVM}I~>foFF9^iZ*@SE8~!b}n#51h|$?`^Ac%`D;kee5LgE-o$lkwwC}ete(s-mIZb z^lqJcQCw$1j_>nze$?xrLBc~vi2Cz7Xx@@*MS~sL1^H#atg0)w50A6l{v(!|3mTGg$`2nY{KNjM+^W(r`F($^KN7sfw%V7Cl056@ z_{pkpr;5Rsqdy*U?Eht7j$Rui;jBLiykYy^I%t$|e*X-|U-UQA-;$pL$$}iWU%Qx1 z?d9h%Sbyj!QO|!WwklwZ&#^BIzl+21+o$7*9)`FaJQ8x;{$2m+|7(zhvwjbFU%nI8 z(kS7qpX2|rrOPdYCr5u0qFw0nWJC({R=1fFMRhe7D79*6zSK#2i*hyMK7|WM=H+YslLmfpQu}K~oO$_L|L8`G`X2ow-@>BddHGuZgoA(N<3Cmuv*+b& z{o@9|=wQpa;-Pu@TK~j@|KvpVH48Y8FGpKeX>LwYj8`tT|Be;) z=lP@arnRA#6ctwSaNs=tFFkhdfIL4%0_X92{N)XcWdC}A^Z0w{#?~y!zovNLJbq66 zX4#4SQu#^1dHl1~DHB#e!oyL&H1K{|dvIAn;7XhQ=Q(PJ=%|sRmZ~58>$K2u!XIxR z=r;LYtF#ToAwBBBuJS*p1t2_h!jp1A1IYH;vjk|Fb5`8xx1( z%8PtOw|brFJKKM*L+z3XoagPc_hMhj?Vbue664wD^J|@u{hkS&<36l{ZL#e4%uLZQ zIBpl-{_9;iF8O_V92Y6en|G1plIOLE4~4(#y#8paY#-0d9M^Fz8upOqeJ|uVZth>7 zGCR<`p9tQ~_`7$FKH)3!56_$2FFMz%)JdNAGa<)u_tCXoM*_|J*73sr0@-iY%Qf#K z--CJc(c&q!}X+u88 z!;<<#t_DfC12~Ukr_!q4G)lM&IJb9^s0u4h5*`bj+v~h*Vt=!Q^Ey8PydI}#Pq0Wh z*PF))=cL6?^md(kk^SkA<8iJ|LfQQCIw~7D$8*btC#TBmDBA?#7ar$a*Ej4jdUEtT zfOEW7itXRVB;hXL9B=K9&HmUd;mIgJ7Q8P?pM7l25c+9dkp7wIkBMlf1n_1X>ZJ#x z9R*w5|I^Ns$>1+I|4j$(=ge383*s#kyr#nn&XUJj9&aMCo}0Y$*5~p%-Z4@5CmiF= z-zy%z$h8jC?6boA3>q(wC$W%c|MlL{vYkAhBmigs-FRc5R~}E2fphzRH6!eMd7euL z&hx~@dH)8RQ-lYo{=Co12Cqs&flA!p2zMdh_K~RP+Fr(wPr@jB@H#~N$ z@{r^HvFV9nv%HVu{>S#u{J3{_x&I|Vp5ybw^7<8W|4RnW@wu;H@;c{5gPg`%Qi0&ICFBT);X0nw(1NYfi~2pW`nUy!b^;yU6jE4f_*-r%d~Fxg38k z_=m^WntvUsDbJ@ij4y28>~AmDkmDyCdO3cA_BVS?jvw1(QGfQ&g{5Q0%kkp?&iQKvts)zi2a2B<^I9i)e9DF#&%ZyE+qzR;FF7>v z^SyoRML9kkak=ATYkG1|IX+y#**`1Zx>r9?e8htH@rb$o0>wuJ&wt?6{rtD0f#O5E zZ%qdO^$J13f#SmkJQHbf*`Q;A;)Bdn4zm88u{nPjyrQ)%JCJFZ-KDhsN z=-lL+TPpV#xe54`^8*PG>Y zDwn2xJM>zAQ*J-o6j48JzkStw0sFTDyzwLKR|2&k`_Bd5)oO2l9jN`%H0L<6;5YrX z-^D=fmyLQSf;X|9W1ZZ7Tz_8wU8vCD8+rZ5>qlPyo;@=2iXQ7Kn!jyRMg4jGJ8o}> zAcKTEfb;x*sc0ojkc7K{^Y|Qp`M^A*gvSEs{x`YCywxTNPXNyCSH<*Lc_=I=K6rhc z4Bohm+94JRXL*jVK4-)B$nxos%SIX#+cww=d1d`+&eF7p?K9zzs!uxo!*M38QTMN= zY_x*|yoK3wvbo*JpZp%qB=n1*52LzTqdotc?^YBUR#L(pSZ{=Z*LB_Z4Q&!`!+JRa_@bFBu9uSV z807PMcF`kuhtd*m<^3;sQ(`tX}Kg_u8a8E z@g@`ekU9M?m-pqO>xi$NUu>TXe>J$gJ%5Gxy!?30xp4&epB3r%NIuU#Lzg{&9eR zx9rLORm1c0wf>0#zf{S2jjP%7^0od+0RPI@OUqUd&CA#NCl&k?zM^fE#~^ZD^qhkB z+?WV-o}7jA<7~)>%@BSdobK;BrO!0Zq%9Hqc7Edx4t%d;Yk| zj|b^uHRtD{Gjr-oe$wJ3N`49l&xYrMBPBWVQ;hUk_LD14)Fa>Vr+wKcOQK~8L^H2WoVK6@ne5du3dgi>(KUw&_p8S0c`)uJq%X^J?TdcXCuTt+v z*@Qj(J%UK^$!==DwEem5HR(Hd(<^!y_kqv;8~Wk4B?i=+>||;eSc?n(T9hf7t(5rk}qiKhMbHEw5{;_Bm0~;Lh={8}f{sf@{SD0atwYpYNsg zj2b?4p!}s;MWxc-{`*os=pEeE(c0WLd@_|t@xbFj$}!>RE2dqKlycOI@GOlzgAX?E zWN_!;q4A==Z10sOy`zGFD|-I(y?z77jUKIh5m@>*YHoWYp|{tXa+_~m?|X!vL-LUtyyBq(UK4QgAAg^h(_)Gr=!)`qlm=ISPO9a&K|`Wt zPs(=3L;u{Ke-B>y?q82dmh|$ya86nO=;#l|4IQog&JX`smGp&SS#KuvwjOco#_EwR z2asN>kE?0!`leT#{&kR>P_*Ct-1wXEdk3*U=>C)X#a@M*Pgl4wj}|me+ac#h8i#c1 zC+ioPvQ+i{Kg3UkeQ}821n^JoH5<(teyaKp@k7D)AWa4T_{rlXd7sQu#E(Nfq#(@( z|J{wxjC}4Q^V48QIQU@;gdgf}|N2az-xcNG3uOCU;I~bSx8?J(W|5NLvzLkZNTS?M}GpBkJLS6&@}n}TQ>5;^NIR(-aGhxi{xJ}pWnaIv2fi}()!Zm zSR~|l-E#8u{4{CZWU>KwAq{=Bb($6Wm3TA9t`qI+g`Z==JKD_lT7I9X2md9062>F8 zCjtDTXRNym#4}T*#E%D`pQB0z|J+~m!wSabVJ(5ZKL9sy(T~es2G; z#ljzpzDo2Iax+t;#J58~$D<4UUfcB>LL>9?wfi?O_?vcYb{2N#=2JX7(I1n++xLEh zgd)oNgf7B8nBOyjzY4iLps0jfm*j5G70E|y6qE2U;N0)J92j`9IB?b9YlS~}of-lD z-t9l$Dv@`cnrB@V1Ag0ccdwTWPx`g%ngsCkjV@comUo?M)~-`i!GFEa{OP5v zx%I32U#wHP4^zqX{mD42=dvNseK0IR_)F$1`xCtr`6RFS-57)YupRr9T|#SJ`{l*ONx%@ZZN>aQfE-GKQ zRMdmZ57X~1$K@;Oe||4;1S?TeMUQ`7=7hctkK1j%GkMl@qLCl0t%ZH8J7Qsdb&dsY z@v7({k2ybkkUm_Lp!63@GW4b+<@cU8E3$eWf6tojA%6NcVNU|{ zk+!=ry}r@T%pCpPANl+uY`O5y>N59wnNSawBK`b*W-sdP0{@HSn_ikV{ZTy!(Ciz% z;FC_Of5M~O{+s*naErXJP6wa;w0G#p5xlP^dE0Nf<@;I=r3b-(D!xM0hv&D#9bcbe zl<;imcYrtU!`5x(eG|{i+&-6XkDRM_3XhQf%*&$uSjcZ3bl)u7pMZSs4=t8Hsw~^@ z0-lUC`_+qJ-j~sMscrvs@Ei|I{vPN(qpi6Y z_6Pr;=Z~+_dq{a)AP=eMY?^V8@@YIyhTpxA=l+?D&$1pGkJFGZ0;-oVmk#FxysY54Kr&pt8tg~iTHk&=FXk3f6Ts*9BkcLPL#eZ`4c^3fGH`xB!t|L9rwqK7>;i5`2hMhV z^rYg2f6qKjWqJPnBYq#ngj+7%^yrNz8Mmz!_2TzdZP?!P!jC;Fc46EBoZnmZq;2(% zhUhUfxO^9IuHV^TXGc%EultPUV}W!1%AG6t#>rnjYKtlU(I)`s`hDE}*x-;A4g0eG zWZ+!C)-@}xS{Zp_GvoZeUM_#ni~3a(4f$(x`PrKC7Zu!eAR+kJdd6+*ME$w^?u#ZR zZG7!`SHFJXTz-eoRx}*(Waf{+jrKmGUvnHB_`YFL!sw!Y5DR(k2azjotkK&E6?hoF zXOsZm>~&|%2D=L9lIQs`ZE?4yyj~>z$&gD&dfnM>kGwziqzLcdt zJJT%O;QveGY-p+6{!Rv;NJ<<0=kH2Hjf<7^{@!ZaYYpE{cm-v^U4ig?>B#=5;sW;TwhDB9ZD^Jgg(f6~~j2;45O_cKd`?f6T+gG^6AE*0l zsX_#GUyOAU?;j~&ku%yiiF!Jb?l@S*Nf=#J4;SND7d;(P>xg2XdJ!HAoa6gwh1pi# z#}S?YJQ8-TJUZpF?5AYl?57LiZ?0iKkbFAuaLD&eEccxW>np;uf%Et=d2*5Iy#69T za(r;gwvF(h5=x@z(eryn9Erjo-?sc`&Dm-1bt0C68{Np~_YTjxy{{5$AUil7c)u{A z;pXKAr(h87gS-dzsL`m@%ODAlWBo|Gr=F}~lyH{kczqNzzosmo0Xf}fVSh^P<+pj= zO69xYCvK;=69x{^3-hRcCMV?hckVLYeDM$aif}h@w!c8_j~>bG7zdo~n{;;mdTvLh zod0Zx{!uVONtAN@ahw8uw}yGjna^G1`OxoYUeE7H`J$nG9&7zl)Su(Q{nhL@gCa#4 zv~J3TUiL#6_}`rk`Gx(>7E!%@;75Qre$Z{7+vh5$?f5VTq4pXk4`p`{gDj)slaEp{^2dTy)%)|^&S65 zzLQp|y|NJ})@`ERU)|kn2?p-a8Lgohf6|cJ&@N%%*YsrH&Zms8daksRlAm0fby5WQ z&$=eu$#0j);A_`Oap2GDvm~|v+J~h`zjmFJ1b(rO=Z_U+B2t>qwCf~-X#JFl^->1p zL$?b*5U%WB3}Mn|r9J)om!QAqJ|Rw;{i8OG8x1)||0}rO1wOA++FDMmTTo-oFO0_m z=XFY!D#N%)K7*8~2k=Ouo&`c*jiq*n2_F|)gGdMBTR+kx}E z@t$kg$^1FEA)&I6=l+_teAR)$duu#H{q=6hbAR1riLRO2J##DLalpC1j@q3tX6Du9 zEN}1uuS^2U)qUFda>b0Z|DpdC|LBu~MftoREo^-d->hKNe#SE(&->ABwcmPuWqHd9 z#&tV|Jnu)_cR5PkGiu*yje$ z^?USU^xA#KuST){IN((&L%C+mU#55VYxgbvuf*DOGyS7noSMW(<#z|hj#iZ@pUDrl zrlKAx(AT8S)3hROJFX?Vf*UiDujo{-3g>6AIN_$GQ9_>MY{J7^O@cgvOSpBHz{8NX zYn_-RKM&!aD{vlH{@7%HE6ANA9|5@-qyuA*JT*!By~yWrXW91hKbs{y5je+T^?luo z^79I`4)CFVJnp4}zkl8ks}*(#Ys9)F1#!XrOzzP-(^n<3%3#~I>l$E5`DU6mJ|E@aQk*N%Is z;6M4L?<4xX9gYLCD3Jba@Lwh;T%ur>`85A)$34PcEc{(>lr{eOCNx z&@~V|KJR(+%lyWI%i0YV`jm3O=l->z#owhagwIjeL5jRS1vvMwb6vl;g#KHWhH8py zLk95tl%ZVR+dd!MaYIrH{ZIAKC5!TN*H5q9XcGA^n_Mo>`&s3FZjb}{6{r3=mhV$2 z{yf+O%J%?p-edbt)SvmBA1>u9{x#Yf30?&9pSGUUh5e%7CO7iA zo=4y6)R+B1cpPw^|Mv`c?dSRv?gQ>{h;r60O-bSU5}pE__p>|Z-2BD}e-NGloaeu3 z#S-(&@A=m45qf#txnTsUzkMWg98J?WM)Kit~~sdlh;A{_H>}qn$W!Coi9HW?zJV|CJ3sk1H((Ki}Tu z#)E^fPjA~N>d)g!;}s1yb}PGN5paV8IQucY#LC()ZrS;~$>73yKbOC2WXzKW*ZaKA z`ePx_>7Y5Q#4g4YH0Ag1+3$G$2ZhFS`N^8{3ps*|&%M@RAmK`V|MNXRgNBZc zCJtS4J7q)PjEz68X?3s3nnY6T%H?x zd+t4T>B^PXZxW5li$}gv2lYBspwD&uOSp;Oqr?4mPHH!|!7dntr$L_k>xpt74i1v= zB;Z*{I~dL^HA=V>`Jvy7djD8#=rfaqhusu$$K@~l@rUMm8OMFANXQpjTcWINp9lF7 z&=V1|(*Jt~WPdpDc%*%fP3vNo^z%5#`oFr??=@L}nnr)vn55ge>JK~%si{Yk{+1m5 z2EK2|ar>y!!s<0T+~&B~hyNh_!f_k2bLaY@Z&}9ZluNN+9|@fM&46d_im&(DyAim- z13ZW_l*{s#wRX!5O()X-N}K=Z`}c>Ad3W?UL@t%Xagqdm!L=IfHicGKRERiAN4}b& zUo{lv1Ov#0O z|AXeOc-YTzmJQzZhMQY)ya{WBze2&c9T0vgXqcLx_S&kP#Qrh4@ z-@iR{%-d1J$B2fN+trJ5iZ?nqx6r{!CsB?u3HjWvbFVr)su8dw4Y&jKiHJ||$?f8c z$USca*Ke!t<)GgbdQjAl+hzY>7q`mo5)Pc>;_A3TPvv&`f0TU*d`#CD|IB12nJgmq zP|K(-_OYjy8hb2dEG1MKO9&;V*4RgFQB>@)l%Z&B6%=W0L$zY7w3eo-gti)03{?$P z{lD|>_e^eHroaFH|2`jX-u-^hx#yg_zW45XV+YRlQe<}PLvp=%VV@JcL#0O7^j9zO z;3b1+xHqPxzj}!QFAco!Qk#wnwup#OJ!fHD=Xo?6yls_MT=Vx`;8+b`_l1Z@tG%PP z^PDfVi*=-S9wv;|8(ElNt&mSo7IAmroa>MHwBATWzK~bmd(*T}uFtf``-gM8A}$@Y zKGyn~4tatx`!dEA`)^2NC>smJ$1 z-o*0~x7*jg`=yQCZq1l)a-e6_ey0_XD6!$$9y^=ANQJ1@Sx z`6c%&(w_sI`{mR15gGivSH*9O_R04zst-7wW3Z8R!oH}lL|n|!6Y|@>djU2TR_*8K zSux->`1oOeqlB|O*U#IVUk#Au;~|%Xv}A|tubCuyeh$m=>s>Tnrx(SmS>@952F|FQF07Sy?*;bmd}D5`!k}$2RG&Z zkPbW-X-1#E(R_cJ+CwVh6`3L8a{2V$--B#<{&Iig_EM?ut}pcx&h0Q3^4I3IO)y9} z$1@RlV4u1R10*~J`CMP$T)MK2<3#pxdrJpTcf9v{DL$qwOuOz~x`K z+R-DIA9+Uj&Hgnzma|SSpY7-R4*&XgrUBzD*%u3W*8fLUi-Gm~YY&OwFFUqr1-CmL z4$>D5JO$~y)wWH~=P&A!?d^H+(HnAoWI!$l>9nt2RF&hA%ke%d{9c$abyU9kMn3y{ zyXL$eW~siSIo{yKzj*$BFmQT)nt^dQp2sQFOFa0iA9?@v_xw~l4<>;he*awYPzwTt zgyO252R-12J*cqF-}6)LJm>{KE9I`==cn3vkcy`HF$Vrw&WZThkrGb#{oJN?r-bYhS+m3sHDKV)@c?*=_GV94hR|dq0A|6ESO~ zt33CAn*Xz)KbO<1DCc$^GtY~piw>2K_aoB5k328zZeFSRWq<1t-j~bwy<))c7MV29 z1V4m!p`Z8V+Lj4B62YHdZT)S3??*UreG!lS?5W_BP9?s^^gcol@2jr-!Rt-r`*OL= z$8)0r_nVcIzgrM_LHNh>zKOs9ylyBcA^i1j+e}v;o z@`)P#>$i?--6fX4;GW4U~!KUhlN@b~@&*Z+j#-MY!+0l$Bd3;EvP z?^rMU7x}fYoBMmQN^6$L{$)Wf8oc4PUKW+#ztFa?SnwVO-<{6)52gAK+e3IwtZ!Rzy6nXMZU&!zlkqg*yiVSB zvhp`W$A7pFxFHibfA`mNc+A4N9g@`BQc8LMd0)&qHf{*%phL0KH@-w<3P1PFJ>T)+ z)UZB`M!lE(?;9Y7vrxSeaUzhaE?>84{m+mW!7s?S${5YuD`%?-PUv& z^ND(iM{x=wqH=H=C{A_l$BZ342w!}sIO+5lXTA|}TF}4wr474xbA1>c$fvrdqf+ZV zz8l3fu0{gq`~NPSk8YmZnq`Ef7$?1`U(Zfat{ePMt|gw}^)B;iUdq(mhsgw=IEwv7 zT~ncl?{B{Pk?-~<;RbGR+@8X|3!UCKz&021dfT_cZ?5O@U1#34xPpIR+yR{HdG*|X z+U#gnVFYl43%Gt}pYD|RX0q{g)OMG8FP!4*2F~?7@1?hnvC6kUvwjb7uIHxno3yW> zAIA4n4cWl?=F>OTA3w=`B}A=3S}*7>3Hv#o9RJ)NKg`$0U$Mtzfj$f5zAj#ie>$7u zWwIlm$L-J^gBS4qM@8R%_P-u+&avbZ9ppEcoy_(%n|=57N6)VlPI~w`1gCs&V$jf` zt(;E#Amw8mL{$&cmkvEyNV^9vs=X?-)CnRexY2xB#DU9A@w8|tq(yn${y8-P96ol; z1SkHca=5+6K;M&ghkt3_XaqBTl~wR3$(tO&GmzGrGW85| zmGnRN5qD_ET0~q~#(Y)y+iANo=JgV9sqf|dFFnKK^6Rle-j1|GZ2$GMzAMH1(2R-5 z=Y2t6beub%HIP3kzF^{DsVqk=4Bl} zgQYU*J>|&ngr3JMzE~#P5smeC6!5CMMwF4u@oMnH&n`M-J8h72Af46w(QKY`$j)5Y z=>p!SUEo-wMOZ+14(ihlJh0-k&rHCnKDa+}YJ%}Y>}$pAj>$4?q^TnJ}78SgiFRUg^T zY{==Z34gOQ*58rsOaX2IzI)vAl4jUR`g1YP+JN_J*DjpzzbobZ=X^Jwe{@vwPtoHW z&t1@?`{P1XSm!Oz$bSVlrXrthf91!k_X(qe%6V1%spGUF&fAO`8`mRl(9pQCby^LN zOBgb_jy-QNd9Pm;@dxh)?=*pvQb&_`mw6$z`^T zy5XyjXymicEkA1QB3U}fzZCWxycKbm`h;0jSjD5*f8a4cEN)jw!c&mX<4K`jN!`MM z)4I*FM2u%iNYlaJbE|PcVGf!oPA$*L>mTs89a{1*0{Rpmo>c~y(@Hr1ul6H-uM14k zexiO9@uEy>KTe!~ROxvwCQ^L3{kVW{n=(D$ciOo9qyW#X7yp{S_LC0Wd~DceZa<_y z3;D6|cevwvw7>Z0g4cXXxK)mS2fT>oU*0HU z5fP#IS440)1*H40_>Ya7IAUD>?o0RC^r_HK>L~tRoX_0&^fMHpljEy)|un_=|rcc)$GGcDWq?6y$UK+a`LW z{#X3d!S8wDaUXy2PeL5Bz$^Le@~1^D!e8o7+UrnrwusBJ0V}r^)AT3eYp+A2z>h6- zIj6W#>-%33H~1zkC7156Xs=6&O!rrGxW0;oz9gh6NV$%PPxYOKd^)FkitM*3Zlb0eKmYyBQMo~+*keB#f0$^}d1 zvwnUq@?Pn0g92=M_Gd#*_mlAd0jI_g|Pm?Y2oUBG{w)T(JA3AeyL9tYmi|1>GUqEiowj~j9xq>U?t^bVKgS${V0 zik-h-SXjbYKi}v5Vcoi)q~{DK-OnN}7Npfe&QFezNj^S`WNi{ zxz@uVDZT}Mr@;ex*P+`x{lvGxcki>o4@_v&!%ut*eD^-$j_`lTZ-dN!;v1-quMPak zC&v%+6W>5>e4XI8TO9h*Pkal!2jB*O`Gvo2+W68uqm8eKtMc9w{LX~D?pNU#;mW*X zh?LH$9(X@4KhMf)`Q!nQscJn&ihAO_7>#@~zPG{sY~84lJLP`N`!bUtH@|n_*G3Cj zBiaG)%S;7+;k)CNOcoVZ+errUb3YP(>`nYFOTND5eUmA`YhS!n&LGK~bA%i}kJN8| zR#>(#2l}JHdwe#&HD9l)?ew^i=kI`w`*)E;dR}GJzIS?h!GugRKKZe#bv4{)D&wN+-v!?I< z;~YoX-WVfJgo&?3=#(jg9`|l?Yxmcp18e zoBhQr7Q9&ShQ7JtN4`%$@z=ihoCMzWmOlsk+oz{}?>QCx-N)BELOD=K)p0=6KMA7s zW<1(;7UX%Kp81~eoBK2IX}xJdKAkJ=(vXxW>WSZvD`Ee<`r_5E*8r|}fX~k_+JE2W z{h#{u^zDmt0q5rzQ?|TJzH)p*57zGn-hwieqw2Eb%{Rsvex|>ve8yW*hH?zp_+-S< zYP);U-_&pTeO!Lu_R@tjh2(y%`(60S_}tmGyYaX~^KmxH=k=-ue0PWGEB!sk_h|Sw z@XuY&t}kB$2>Swb>96E(=T7k1{*>tgPk&FO^J3hE^aLsg`RCEt-|)i2PV67GE3N(6 z;5(NZUo{q-zXP@Q>+XyAgw%CEHHl(<|5Llt+Ar)<<`g}ehP;WWP_O6OFMId~uH z^qWO)lYbGloAqs#IDVnfXV9mD&+TZwY1)&;+h+D5m7__ZELzTrYS=i?e@`JhihV;M~smIoy9e2Q`Dw-ycrJdAqOMl{Ao2 z>7e;Js%-vtmIXf1lz9K={_MeH2Mu{AZoH~Z@xynYE$X3&$L<4D8yLsNY$Sq$8|}!a zI;3Mx;*720FHsKr&neqF)xs<>&Ll$*<*N68alUMy=Q1;u@=Q+TXCR$8X;K20{lEN* zQJxaUB@9(nkzXvM^9sKfRJ!XvmGxZxeEa{>6R*(|1^F1H2L?4rt2EnmmkOfzIFXuhUPBu!-Wq<>!1W>al9{-h1|+XRBsY`LU4W@{3;z9|du>{Al2bNcXfE zS(L|DnrE&3gkF+S+dp{Ul#Hk?>*4#T8Nk2n6?>S=BtKJ-pN;gxdKZ`QJVZF#q5DJl zxwlr8SA$T1qUS%KUs#&9u&^CuuMP5)NA||!eAd4Me`Fq&$Mz-yZ~OVPKV*9?$WKNZ zV^~$#3KPp%UA5smE*!-hZnrHuU`9(A=1Oo({xXS-&LD7{zk5Ues08g z+NqiOem@`*a?wbe)Sh^Y`x)uy=R&c-f7@PSt=xXt=gi`wo^waP|51q@9e6%6ra+GS zli@5&8EMusylZTd(64bLH-xTauXK zk1^^`5hu3ic+JY}4&kO4;Jm-vx~ErP)=Bc-a>7r}J8?Iho4YC>5BVgdV^%NC_j?0b zuqzdKm8_HwQoM~0^cU9O_GrI)a=daN$JYa&HHo;Tw+IH=p8?$bRQS1U*vuwI2~R}% zQNSNA`e}hl!ufet4DhdNwR*Zdu7r(Ei%5q}APZ_nv+pP6br@chmKeCaTUx?hhtDh@r- zz%TAA@pqU-Xds;JjRpQr$I!S!z{y^&d``JBjT({nC{EGi8)s9XXL#Su^*8?1tPz!@ z;6@Mf6`kr)>u^YC{HfZR2s|6<8-G+acmmT=OBa2mMo2VQM^5c;f*}8Z`1j>=^NCMt;@8hqFNO&spd0f0%^Nr-9 z63+3?059Ueiyp;*)3~TEWOU*nKg`dBzXP_#x{$5Li^s)C;5~j)-fsgzwG+?78J{!t zX^!lt6>@f@-#Xs>%v2?@6&pZi6v zpwD$BC7kQY3EreKu_H@Kcrx<2y>1`&N3lo=XZbYnCbzj?w={5SuaUv|*9~6q&JO62 zZ#~BIu`rDFiW&GF?4g6q>`W;`9@L1$?dwt8bJfp0Hvmc4z z<@{0MY`Hu?bg$_04r;II;H|nF^eZD&AKYFufWPv^F{8is%J?q>t`C#_%!Zuqg^0tw z$?JUUWzx^{xCQv${@Kgr_R90HeZ7eL#3jpX%H_vkUWuG3@Y#Dh%KgQttDb*ew14v6 zZrMK<%5@{Xx^==FS-%7M9;8ibk0>kmw`}CwUKjqQ1`eDm_a_^0-9G{^_qutozy4$a zzIRpaD{_CbA)oux+Qf?&<^Gg{_&UJTB~|~hyhV5@_a_(dz^#w>RFH5t^0_~~adlZU zi-dDK@__f?@o(=|l<;iibAMWtdHn9H63+6vm%{(F6AN=H0jK_CZI!=2*}$7N;JmsA zQl}i`2lppC@Z)#y7M0tX1^MwvqpDQ?v9cdKl7NSPa{X2n2~R~n_owHDt%s{hIQx+S z-pmCT?^Od%<9|(E-l2~F{|bN0E)U{cBB~$UpCW;`=$pP@Zg0FUX8em&A75UuW`&NF%_d5)vKL_!*gLkLo zj7?FJeOymY;Mcxx-lw{RCnKNR``wLOcGi$^mQMrk$%i+})s*l|O~yB9AV6N{lV?s2E60SHbc11C=LCxSF{MeBQ zyusSD*18g&f_!f8kN3WI&MM*TM>=?&j!j%tFAq1yzz??R*n4;D=x~sIxsc;_wC|)`x+7eD@8lMiIB+X6x?R z{kD8X6pEXpt{7)|e@BaiUQWGTC?MPgIo_XfumAbd1_^fq=jU7W~@ z4!t3N?=u@XKj#WP78u6g>!k8+<%E4Yld!+kHv>I^dHRhpn&0he-+#$qxUc$WgB<&} zYs`XLvVRWfcYxP$bdzMsKclrt{`F7EkbmyT`rR7+Wt%)aBI|bn_aLqQ*LvT3=j2~D z@;Sa8uHBs}$43_^{O0&xx-xmL93KmCj&F^De}5pw$7BP}@m-xea#>Jb{7e>9^YLVIEIfQoqf-XqJ$Jn9x+kW034vN8hv;2F*R`Azt`uJ|4{OXnV5}-@gJcn?A zPgJ$OtohqxnQJ%0INmhQXycUz`NQ)!tO~N_FOc}!cx8g$(|TdQxnR5kweixKh5u6m zb{^p8wOk76*T%~V{@qKJkNA6TtBscf{KTmzqeEFSQX1#9@ghi#Bm78)yay@a%D868 zlFq3e@cW|to)`b_)gQNtAC}(*5&8`#H@;&W^`+>aWtZLb23QDH>&fUIAoBVB;?9Y~ z;^g;>V}nK9xZkzN3b`%6Uz`Y>`<;GK{9%6omh9!<2TcJl^N=X-dV_~1eh*hzBib#$ zKO4<@k=86%e5$|SN!P|B2mBu1rHQ5})+|!8$BFl{xt~Uc2>(u2E&M~E`gTyB4DtDW zTQl^=fPb;&q&I_<8`}Cjx>}#v=okDxcOv*iQ~HI`(J_C#1G+rQl;Z7s@0I7Pk@j`3 zS7~$hEaXjTX`)|oeO9plbyc26_;+@BoGbs)vX^?NFp~Vqfj#C>;dc~L{q+qwMu*_> z{|evtyHwoXV!&_q)Y6H^SLRc{&w&0!@FM0HZV?zO7=))HpW933m0syV5+1Qv_{ZNZ zU)w8uS%6K*E3y91`;9}#OiGaK&_}KmaW;nuKbQZtyMyv`)ao-jss}6b?cg2!O8Ne~ zQlE6Fc4D7s>Q~THs(x*~Lxok`4tXciLW2f}8R7-5_II>1exHsIDmUe*(3b|eyF*J& zmCMaQKDW-GUUgA_mRue{Io+|#1d^stNM&4p0!NFU@RRSuBw z802&N+3D@o*C^rfz`1^UEG=EuB;iS{f12>~_|Nly2$b+-*q;jCxMr`^4FXQ>jr)HN z+DQg@9a5g%HN#I4Wl>KV;N^ffQ-3TlSc(U?Cw{-_*B{P439tzbay^?*3wvu>Z~g7B zo@2vB+-{T{YT|k(`FNDe`s)r{`iDzZe|iCm#GB)ra?|ZSWV5c*JAJTMJ_S#UsA3h)3C)>n;A`!TPs$ z{_9gY9;uMyco_Sy86d|a33vw5EeBSg@fVL6;5kTbhkn24FCJ0A%@M-hfX@$>43**$ zjeKtJO*>!Q90r`)qjvs^1%KnD(+3L0a7z@a+;5`3 zw{TQJzIOh~0)O(9PbWu27UXN^FLMzQhbcY6*A_A7pTB6_;`vK2siNz#RE+D?HbUo%mKB=K~jwe9$FXlxq6z7Cfxmuj_BaHdwI6nj5i^-MBAwBNqf*(;-_{sdt zLLxs(lb=#YF?F{U|{BR^;X$v0T zSzZ}ejLs0jWBqZ5+OL#wlb7}5yD$60yEV|;1cSz?t4!U z84)1icHrDki>;o&*C^pU|2V;muINeR^#J*6gP+Nqf_EaYTZ=&G(cvJz1w3zt@H-9s zj(xIf(eFpd2l3OuV}3UH7rIWbW46d_v97d%??M_;T*N1E{KtQ4e;<|N$8lr-2OfMh zLJvFq)u$8ss%|XN$>67a{yk6|c*#iny*2%UpX&?Xy3>Pt_JCijNckY`?|Z8I!th+4 z*PUMQDH7B#?3(sO`Q&Ftak1WFe-CW0(pS2!H^r6^apHE;@W#$Q@_I87ILGPC^DV3R zx?G7PfPXvagX1O}S&?@TU)v7S!Jm5f<2Hc>+d-hV9pr#Nxm;1-d&pdZYLBKJ zM3xl(H7sGQVUA#?NQtklw;1q$K9S<`Q*XZCW#xKH1pn!bO2??)DC1O6L@D7voh$9Zz`v_AnKG24#fpUC z#kw5oOn(#3`zv{$aPpi6u@@Wd%>b@XfpgpdEc!$QuzB$;fcQA10daWP<^Cm z_P0cXFK~k~x~CYQcwOJ!d-^j~Sd}*z_;-sqerH}uZnwzUlQBSpMo2$$me}v&M(>?fodJuX$Q{ztmE&Sec$aTJ9r-&r+m+g_oc~Ss*vqT zhTgi(E8Z&k*^7r%CfVabzM@+_N*y`<8~#-7aRSdqx~0>JWpX>xl@)&SJhbN8dyNAy zo|8X0h^GZS^N;ZxdAui_-;=fhkGMPhT8KqhKsfIUbFh3!&r5vYm2emG`8m+=wo?+r zBzgW$fE&EVbNcP%eN-gxK|c3`alH@ed4Ci2yIk}Wu8(Z+H=gWzz~6h)S>Wr+iMag! zWYqi8J|$nj;>SoSmig^#E=}7+9xL|v@R=e6x?yW~URYN3r!Ro}zDvXFhBuDI^^@Pb zNk+N+os}t{)ip`)1^K=QlLnq`=gb;oo1Nv@Ik?8mCPT$hnZ7f8O;3uft{g+`z-0 zwX_FY^6d8@pY2;!x&KFU|6~8M!Fwencd*?5bQa;a1$L(FUTc*5pA&JjfcNy@LNy9W z?T!1l4Y>Y?H-?8xxC8mzziTX5e7dlNbN_aMm%e9FV1$IbIUm2vlhQiDRRlQoZzuPI zDPn!$0e{YfR`Ym&poo^3hwU1EHu#t3_UWnp&H=^W3VuXI5vR9mO!!dR59jOevrxz` z@72REf?n@Qr;5A}pAEdhs7_Z~W>w#)#peRwcx%>!U^8#d4^B@jTbyWJn7tdbiVlka%o7vdAT)I9)H=sOyJE6RUXFUFWK)!KHImg z?9%J}+*I~2qOyojx#tZ%p;CXeBA>^rau0@D!X%u_w}ZF6al_x`@xqCGF8|QVmm%_a z!Sc!A6+1nvk33%R`ih^c%&Px(h*Uquv@-ec|GeRC6@%(i>o*g6y-0f-<_?k9LlISk z-@G0wR;F%_ydFw}oE5x`Y2icijaO)AcE(#i?pDN>*M4}sbOK-bWwj5B$~f|QyzE-; zaQ$Ku&f{eocuO5`MHZLvOyqNazF61Zu>^1$FWndiIDTI6&#yT?wIu3MhlBVo@Ok|d zQB}le*W6ydeY-N>q2b%W@7{mo;m8PPij>-$4SXkfQMSbTr7Z%d^0n8kZt%)9I(4gz zMj!FD*R3A#m(K|5An&QA5)^U%sWr7gx^JMpjwL{SPZ-x@Ug)z_6LGL2*(w>%Q|J->WslHNk7iuvBh}Rqeir$xTycY4@c4h?JHT@zwSYgm%#2e3 zHfD;H_&V@xNbTV7>f-9h*EKAq@==f3sAm`W9V)+L;r)d&pPvI+y~6)A@RPo=_XsRF zKKSkr+riHUzx#)U>iFB25K&&}<@>`CHAQ^L2Bm(C4m>yEeIO_Mm&msd!~s6nLwM`Y zPs-1gU92xjl+!#hDN%kd=myT~fl=?x86`h=_5kO8pubkHru^JF8#vEr$hp6&r9J{ZsJCpcZ}3k94EligA4v5P=m5`+)CPXUlGk>aeKWC;ApJV# zA$5YEdU8(BU_a0Obei_z2H*I}Z}&o?*pfW`+V+tN{tus*%ntn@&;7W4=xU4j{8acG zbC|i{b3bk$+`p-08rN)yyA|>QFwKE;nNQM}6}_F3NL(m)f9AgUypB!*&ie~KjJvx=UPs5W zeMrkEk7^~aqqA6km55sv%kbJt^{EGyp9TMO!P`D)^WXd|fpF_3A;<9@^pUBj6kk(h zT@jyXq+?@#SsDWUw65S-P!`R9+WMq?YA5NiBNloRktQMKm=j-}|Bz4TWG8=@DApzH z&AQb^dhbs8zJ{h9W#^aoeRrZsYopp5iv4}G*@Rg0Qs~!Ptin&eFP>qz)-AUFSP$bi z;Cx^F{7UnM&=M2XP%8Er9KbntBYM=k`*QrZYas9Yolq`6wfox6t%q+M#`@iw@(b&a z)w(N17TT%Jhn(|lGX*cLm`-=~t-xQ7e3LL*u&es=k%qhN> zdcuDmUteE!W}Cr6(jxvg;5@#rdoOr!fJKGX`r+?7Ily~m)`DQ8g!6ZuT)^Ea&Rsmu zQTgfjM7?tP%iLcc(o6DD*l*>5d^PvfH)Q*=k)H)UkMGT#CEMo)uB$KnJiXys!$3(t ze>aNtpMEyr4_Utra;(4TcMGkuehY91(qU&d8G`ck`+jee>p!{m=#pJKKKM|l9E$&X zH{`he1!YZJ^zW=!YccKt&h4*T($A}VI5xEeZpa4C?Qh25Qzhn&+d2feuYP%c{b_i1 zHACL|&SYtjzy8Zq>6{^7kMr+f+Q9oGIIB3XYZUv9No_>^ahqDuwXKWFri1F&1vxIi z#ha0>rS+xBttr3%ptYA|`#iw8{Vo0U_S>?34&d2HyY7A`h3^Ne^Dpvsh?B0N@ORph zH+{dmDy)UQ;90=?epl5@`FLSO>3!LNi{mzfi$?-}C9??j|;j1?5+xd%^6Fe(; zix)UP<9;LCYX{E`-nwODdIehqLybTBACEsS@CH`W)$#Y7+=cOs`EKz49dY|9KTG2B zY2ML}|Af)Jql2DI$n$rvbd81I++K-K^G+o4g?!$=9KK%U{nV)whJWg3Uyg4-b<9tq zep{BSB7gtRm@`o1^E$fi)8!w_`#V#)e5{jalxy8a-cOwYoZH3KdXG04V#r$ZH*Y_6 z4tTtu+B4sCDF8gd7JS}MnFPMMiHJ+@3W-7gYdA7LPYU?fNhPQGyKc$ST(@L^Pd?JPMum#=^Q$UH8y%!2@1TCb>vWD^BIG)}{bd*4AH@%81ST*{jzx|-Oh-YL|;n#t0Q{R;L3v(RI zzle6#Ygl`;zj($&e)O_{&T>3cP(JSmuDppA18-LaZeE`*;8QuEBL7sf6^EJAJ@S=-k6(< zI2h;s@MeU$;B_#MH}bqe^Gq(rooLAOIxHUNGN0xd7xKw+r5zh|jl^|i%WGHFN9t!9 zB$oMj#=6?T^&aqfeb}$c)BN_`o9N0(a1h4Oczqe`U zOX4Ttdw|SO0)JqukkX+Jf;R65t1DCq{``trryKsYF zd-%(){(kpR+b%M}e^6xWZTj6q`Jj5|cERx?oceJj$H^w*#QoTcbD2;5I0pG7uVDZA zeI_Rna47Ng-A_+~{Htr0?b(0*&OD+}J5NKt2m7A+_nw`VEAEqRAU?J8WVCa}G9|l| z@{GF9`P;|ySJrePSvu7EZzcTY`kQZ^`-7p4RNS8V>zxT!ZtP>>uq5A>94dnnSiVqYn?Ggss1FUwAhlwxyd#fDhWp6L~R7i_B#6zC@(Uh_YyX5P( zBu)AAkN-83uiL2Jv*w66$AFiLv{Sz>u>r7y%Oidc;*g2)HUs9M0}Y~{<*== z1+R36Q{S4vqkgJwcTsIbylQ<>azP*~LQ4He+wKTbue(rA4CJj>gkOm`=lBty`cX3S z>0GhXcfW4y8zo;*o<3@O*wp78-vO@A1fS=_*5enhYaBR++kxH-oae)@cLpsS^&(!? zMfxM!3csq6Lgjeki0{$9=b*XtH^qtHpRlD0yPH)=>7jQKDsVgG`F+YF@7#G{aH+5= z?*z{4#SzOV-VTuPWZ?Wf;^M%|HH{MPT_XBR8hFcF-@j~<@J!_M`xQeoyFCb$@Mz3m z{652xpBgx9Qy6uuJ=ujJp1gx(~$1C{C!rSRK6E}X99o2`QYs!SDw5RxEJ`Sbw6w|Ckvd$ z4J+D@7imNX5sw!s*X{;Gk6?@WNc*0K6@2rc&Z|QdyYx&}Qqr$|Ps0KJ0`JqSp^k!l z?Ry%@;Gc3mKM`gx$hTp<4--ZQwKrWyVL#V%bdTGEgOl@c3veC}+V@+(AVk7#z`4Jcy}tWSsDwL!bANk0 zaMj*033mbK{xG0@oymnH+zp(^n@a=cMqOgQ#1LywS{>J4!5fZNJ zB>d<8_S1;&FN#RG1vt<9Yu7|OiUL>a;u+Nm9h^ppQ{AL7W5>taCyX68VMN04fpPC5 zTTPU>`__35=zr?${rE(WVSf;T@D$|p?@OOf8QpHgNXtaV(}DB*AnPUt$2_@xQ7xY2 zvw-vaAeG~{HQ%;p)PBeta)I+a+OT_(Dlbf?J+8{Al1j zkFGoX`1_Bx#XQFTttj>~`r`C;gBeeOJp1?i zm9@7V=il?q^Xb6ZzX}a5#04dfC=Pi;7I5~jbJN1_6?u1C2J6oS&i z{n4G<88^Qn{N;F`d)eyM=wR&v0q3|q7(S}+f(|u&&+i<-Ic|SG+u7{Ku7*#b-{1nyaqBz&?PJj;r$6QL-M~3+ z@AnCRx8h%gS~Kne&T(s8u4>fryMxue42u1RY~XcCKsmyzym#fLZc01)Tfu$n5pJh< zcivsh?T~OwH{n0G({68k+*n@EMeuqoQS|5ila@pWWRiBF-vN2nzaa6u9HWGr58(Qb zdHv^BH%U16BX>o?8?tJbC%~hsSMB#ej_04FY1KSN3Fq}%HhAw9>D0s|;jBMri|FV3 zh90aMkd~+4Vi*4N{MD*M(!u~CzCMO!*dHP+D$kzaf4A0cCCASVc{lL3 z4eM=_{r3Rp`TMgc|$Qucy;?Rq*B{C3lt zBt+W$@HN*1x?aNH?M*FjmbMn;Ywfp!|K_twhBB6de69Ts@PFHJWbP{w1^HV0lfkbY z5gu7q3Aehhm4xna_^A{aw6Yf9%=#w^=9oW!Bu^_T-oMeHSYLg}hQ|^{-WW z-sN?!Z~xVav(MG<+t=Swx?0JmudDY!mHwf(^cHd9`S)n?F9)}|b7KXmBisg@=id*z zH=1(j&FL+G8yvv7{Gn5?+#bI0ohaa@j8kIX;qhzQoVR~8SO^vKryKG-e${g>ZWCZp zVJhFm`>QQe^;z@%gZfg`*gq^NN?Ral@KWD=jRrzzuaFF56b%88vU>BAA4HX?*i^YYWXN~ zQBaz5le^2K5OA)t@dlfBiPH9r|ITx8+=&a;WtWoa=YORp-}7KYu}8 zk8pzxIM?s*2mY;e{_C+dfSV#Q?{j>uAME`-Kp96E=lxSI=-ItDz$@>cir2L7o4MDT z2x-wiJdor0wR5$iC-sv4Y~Wn}<}=HR@_l7$Kf1oce{Nr6GRiHM?Q=uk0$z(J31{T} zKn~yz#NP&shup8$1VipKPhL*K83CvWNFiu|7|&1Ks8J%=@QYDEH!k-@D22 z%D_GvJqmp=s$?Izd@su7cm?kNr>GpSh<+j-9Ir|bGRDgBvI6IL^*jA_V>w=#&~FEC z+TJ2J{lzN{JSTW}qI1spi&rvu$>0@TI`w8S;zjeP3;mkMM-Oc^?o%}Kx;6RbTbJ4(|4x=M=5;ZyvK?Rie7hT!O$U{q3w>OV&nNXv&@1yV z9TeAijsD2~!cW8L3v~>F=KG)YWkFvwc;}C|TFGMq#Zl{zC`Z}<47qs7u}l)q*?!_v z9NoyLb1IjwOOk&S{uYnfb2-RKsJP#nb{+G}I+12We*EwEMw%Te&G(<;cTh6;{JdHB zw(z@VnFj&Eb{|#!gZMV^9Z0Reqa{vOlFC%+vw_|ebb_3=Wl zWq^oJbwm2}a6kI_J8Iq^gk5&#Cq_lm4_nFgOY4~!w0nNv#sxmvtk~=Ot`L`>d`sy4 zEW6WuKjr(rE5zkzLf=Mbp+~+S)tcj(TOB zQ*PIs+9kbQl+wO~;-!40ee11lL_g>Gw_HE(A!Fg7eI%pc1`qh9q2y53gmZJc3_r*? ze|Kp4&vmoNmM_A38TW7RuF^@r&LRBc^<%0#sod8`fem{)koCZG1 z4~%Fl;^))%jX2-@WdlF^1(f${7K{4V4H9vw5o_GV<aYFmC* zUHqxzR9)yQd2Pmwjq4FNXlUHnI<1DsB@CHdr`Om)3FAhLSMJKS88j}g&WMCzqXvzS zgSeW|c;`fUltJ&UdvJc{wS}?FCA;{&^-SRV>m8iRF(I74(~<++U2I_Y5R1@2IKP){ z9xVJ`>av^(mGCI!^Lxq9D>TUA@rUI3z2q41`j41ew2&kpk9>|>k)Y<`;lQb1Tb78p zCvgh?@o(+b3Tws{D$fo-Qo;M6fv$Q4^eKKn+t5SJ+MI;Rf6u}>*9q~de!a*S z^2&Uu`M$jQoM@Ndoo#tRmSw*7`|8#>5jVrPYu!9<5SI>hJTwZN_c=SjA9A=|FCIe$ zTky5tS5F4NYn|2~^80i$U;BM^5BPn8zKt_65h=}g&a%Qk_RR}EQK(+D@!;?HABb(X z#%zNkB*fRo!!}I#dtvnX%KRM)mLk6Pd-G24$JX9Ag8PTe*T%yQeq(oF?@&MON*j+% z@SAjgHam=T_dnHpyyp5MN3vHL&kV_1MZe+u z2Ck6LKY!(~4WE+|1=mN%i#YJQp-=GcIRmDCRg3Xh;Jj`){&P}X-^#_N12-fB=Qdww zS*!9Nto;28;3mE=!`G?v8~1yuw-PGW{W-XAlny-;-fS8#U#IeYr7YlY4D%G0uTxpx zg6r{VllCt%SXA}opD7n|kt2kk+sb`fO1jQAC4Ma8!`Gd=-%s`J119-c$gzD#+MKu| zm!Aln%l9@~T|?HN0-Wt^6WK73ucJwSI&i*zo1#A$9w^0!{paTzp=bKlG}t8nAkXn> zwl=P6fP}kJg@2JFh5u2WfaXRC&xJhK&#ytf9kP5hOXL{|AVbLf64L90?zhTO}IByjxWcDpX-gA^Y1N#T^K<6 zBj17F(?t1ahs~HD0G!6HobCDRKN|dP3qS0_ae_OlKe_A=cuTLo_+E;K(X9E-Y|r6` zkIM3?kYj%?ma1Ax?hi@8Gmsv*Q>JsEEzh4sl%E59ME5Vt2T3^hH*PQGCf7KwmvC-} zQKLj$>Kqx<*&yK@&lupP24DY7ZV&Ou=lWVQf5wd$C;OL7xl#U{&KIhRj!W|$fYB-4*%tt9FGi+ zH}H4gjW{aTcP{eTU-#!XOY?kA{+c=73BvE%##Yh6sPAZ<(VT+uF`CB_q|xASO1m6E z-<8s{(@Lt&_nLVy7W{L61gz%uE{hOfI}avq) z9bDHRTrW%%(#LBPPD3F($mtw4VhC-3$&1fsy#w@JSF=qCxm_;kJk)|*(c+v8v7O>_-w5)Z#)jtK|TXK-VafD^QhvyKUG*O z)>n3qC@%^89HgJOy0jwD!Ay}V?a=poJdy8;IPrbQ0Ug3}g8cB4Hw*po&>I7}vNPs) zG{bH#h4km3-n_?!Tq5}87VPRk{Z45UzJvHF;Pdx4Qo%PJUU14!zYEHQUe=!l{vUt+ z@+tK@t^PFdS-*L#@Y`OvfsXo}me22*@O!|~;4jRzUM}S4K3}TlK3_ceV|uW_`F-Jp>tE{S_lmNhkLA;2zgjKH`}za#J6W@|ZyUYCr{5Gg zPWa31ap1;k{R|SG3;ogHt-r8&XF#5PrdZ@hq5gNq+^!FwSPhoki zKf2xd?Cn4aPe=Lb;BEgP`(hAq8aMgZD5l;!t4 zWxlq(MvWKoif?iKP)JOH_7SLUud(1?8`y1rXmmlow!J1Xf2}DsOu4C}X@7y*_L>fU zy$ZkHEEHLguWhe6;P3u&i#c4=UTL1-_L{$3qb>#Y5II5kAAlgm;9Ta@b)f_KL{r+a z?|lw^p>DC1xADRoe^-CI_hsOEH~4&=_2keWX-%H3?*ZK40nYb-uTB5^$NtK@wJe_v zocHJTJNoOD1@+IUEk!9`ubU|B=KXn-cYM&|VY{{SS-%B%;fk%*<@Z}Zj%Yq@_u&4l z-v*rRb1aSDXI~U_fN=+Kz7A}A^0nxkMaH*SzYBOp%21Bi=1;oXXXE4s^f$$a{Zlve zDS6XxdF!qz=BWW(?}0q~_iW|JyK~!p#ru5q*}&PqIvs1ROqi4M4eQrU68^J)S!+su zUbdd85$m@AXa6>q3J>|d!VUGek12jO;Ot+u`L)tq&oka<{SM$&C__133FumLa>viq zWQ0(97*>f3aQ_ zY9w5Hn>cFyCkp@Bztlnp=5~MFxFO>f;OyV7kpZ7x>9XiI;07D;3Y4K7|Ll6PIQ^YN z-_qYyKI4@rLpf^fH$_L>U#+%v1vh!|oh4qET)7f_TV9vAp`X_clZSPDZm^LiRlo1~ zp9j3XUk08EaOUCJ$d9Qn)*ny8t3T!US=9Ig=lgNG$s!)n70n-*96}HOPkaaX{Jl8~ z_-z^{p8-DWcY*(B|H^y$JFhZ79qlCzy!cY0yz&wC z_xQQrR-nCQL+;xWmu81pShGmUUu}Dfm?GliS+Hw?pZjgT@9SlvUE09^tkcje`hJ>x z&^kK<>wsK*_t6PH@s##qwBb7y+3kg2r}t+(m*@GMi=usV`?zuI-THhTuh<{R@5^$3 z$%g)UcQ+miu*uel_T=I6rwTte)k&LZROT}}sJ&W|&*e3GtH6Lw21L!;5?p{%3QZ$R_K&Z7*FH!^+JDc)1c^A8h-m1 za6=|=9?#l;(BO}vuRklp@?PNF-&;j*IyG8%U;*P1(}dsL-(S0Gd~@D{BUM?y75Hq* zP>xT#p8DeKyenM3&;OVJVc(In?&c?Fdyf%UiJ#sHdG`N6m4Caf9KB7Mp#`1{oc+J` z)uy(;n{S<9JPkOH=kq$hx%kRLFTYn|$OO**M-<+AZhJ3zm?|Em_d}%x@(B3n_&-8qER6CxLz1-ft;EjD={G9w< z4a*D>4<4VrUyL5W-_=m$4OYZcT`(vysFk&S_Q9hQM<5=)c&QCc$($Xqp~T^qBkmDS z{nG{gJU;U89F^=kdWXqIth|Hx4)A$=bmM%hXZ|d{|H%^MpAC2>((AbfH?Mz5pB;X4 z`MR0H--><54e__`wZmU7-vWLe)4ap9?v)QJ-;Vxf2XES~)H9*rQTf{O+XddG?0?3G zMa$X{FU@+v4gTl}%f2rZRgkY8zcaz_efzaf!_{7wCqwq|ehnVKbuJMPbL))V+Wiu= zF6QxDpQlEtSEJ62anuU=0N@Us%Y0fFCnBF{)UI;y{R{r?$9k)`@{g<1)EQR6_37Yq zKi=OtwC=Ep)p*^g&jQZl*tkAB?+>nfKb7_80uO>+JGNzSnLVdpH9A$|5EMB}_|5yX zc>ltZAvdyR+l9UWU5@5?N;KpJZZLZ4i}8?u|7c^z_@ac-L2>7K>i?}gWuF4{ry^aE zzVmhY{&*Jhd7RijKJ9LRa@|e`waZ-K{C%OQW&7$IB|P#y;Xi+m$2%yYr3tt{d!xaR z*`4u8peV-oKeZEWd{qe@&;P-vfE}?@M#WiGP<~Ji~Z4aQ1K6b=QWM*@5GM8+3Do|Los` zn!SHa+?|ue@)qFi-{eDgCoGw_e>CGZ;Ot+$>BTOE-T!VD>vsU>>!158j(RR#ETqPV z`k4#37yEtq`sbB%-|X^x{R4lP?}q&K<(EqMyZ*`OB-)31L8lm1^}0EEa{W_1**?Z! zqYUNv+FGpP{-H0%(BDdYO&RM&zvcIrJZ&aU(7Op0xNWY8AHUxfUZcbigIk4Fc?WR5 zANgt9jTZwX+y$KH{TdHytv5=z8#v#mT2*V;U6X|C@ZOmRyuG3CCIn{c)PwBLMt=N< z!jEBF7K8=?r}#&87V+_7f23}n@TcCji*wB$p@;t`zFEV!fIs}}q;0`z%oHi{a}a+! z;%EmyenVMfh`S))0(;pW7x?p&1HK7OF38tu_-Wvqm&N}Z<|@dKhdr!68~k^7k9k_i zS&$#2;YZ9D@mc)5QIBv(L4K6RUmN&M!p_brY%j<+YxFz8-`Qx~{0Lh?eon{y_2mYC zWzUP7_;+zwisH}fi%jtN`tU%d&w3TLGE=0)*Y-zUlJNKIHwX4EW+}*bYx<)V{O_BF zoGKnskndYxpx-*ce-ymwY6)|GK3yN0u^*GK50k+srqaHRF?P|e`T8*M_N{h&eW>{3 zn^$?f;OoDXq6^yw*tF#-{e|@}5PpAYNZFC^`VaZMzOSD7q>+66mx+GF*Eg4Yj(B$H z+i|=e);l53<8`gS&%a!DzS76=N1x34aeX(iVoJ*)GgH*Hg5s|s4LFb2s|Ws)7INi; z`e;kR^_jqVyk5T}@OIMG&gWRa7dVgC@v}$2^~%y`J1g^f|rDPfspDeZ} zFY)c$acca#(Ce+io8H~BlFN@+l;6KI%b%=&vv370ia#dtDs_U}SH@1Emr|5lf_O8JH~;G0N5Io$Ps z8?&$Yf<*e8>`T`8=Vx|w(sK7HJ&(Ez&pZlk>!J)#cycalM&;RxF@xKEk zJmLfRKUIvYZHjziGfKD>IN!f`{>k`0d|!d=<8_i9yes`HwG4FY)Pry*^7*>t@|sT5 zgMj-Ruam*IFZ=V1Ia%o8|4AQ@*JdVtf{7j6O%#T9s8CGM_cD}!) z#L@SCTi#!i2>$pF4|Fg|z6g7i_aSi|z;>sA4||R7A!5Gb?|fy)H1O31)f?Ym`+qCX zV9J4h^Ge}g-_uD;_`Vj!CmQ+eU+R0kN(My;!wJtmA?!(7DN^U?xdYTmMWGNL3;9H( zmH)VJF#C}=1*Utnm@m9NFvqM#{>Sz1-eaa3`PR(Ik$Ue`2{Pv|^ ztE@iTV*4Ui3;(T1`*kvXBHL$2KF^1a5mhz^*z?MF-4^}H3Eq+7#ul=DF}b4rWZ*r1 zt~M!HvOf*^x}SueiA9Ue3XyP@&jhbia^;Jm67EI52lCU)FDVoz;Vd7KBK(~5cIm!_ zB;1Pp_`ijnm6wjH#rHud{$9l04qm|Xob^0UQNP!|kLv{Qw~Ke?MIcT(9K_eYkDCmB z&9a^E6|pf>q{P?0kLv;7HPhS8-~A5l`?y~4UltxY*x&sQ?fbZvH6l*$oIjE5?|z5& zeOx>EFLqi!FOlDTrF|;zWoX7Z7x+Y__~xz^ap(AUs8TaSif^DczL}7JxqkY2Kk*IJ z#@7q}FU!_U_7mSgZG0_jh5t3?41Lc}d;_)dwS)iot;GF);v1-quM7MR;e9jx#5YhI z-!$-debHd6Hoi2@Y2z#6s(eQherH2IVx91da2n^Lq;qAw_|N^h6B3kHJjab6GiGQt z5>*eS-h9u+W1(l|-nK=LG<~M-6C!=;4IG8dX&7XOj7b z-{qXKs`pt)Unt}`ZOV$sCAACJ@@VjMQ?XnaST*V=1yHt9yQaEckZs?xMjSW{Q;fyni(bJbun$`TcBi zh#x-hUyXp>>5!ZA>ZzTfX$AFXq8;#cL=O0m&lC>~a~Iez8syUOBR2|v2NxUjgud4* z*8tfc#qATO$w5e50${k<9BCv4kdE~$(@a(&Ufn}m6nzdMl&zD_x4T;cub z+zvnAXG_#)5vtRz8fVN8*Lzg; zYWb;<=W%7(sWZC_5}pB^?-RYI-(D<0!gGN0eWD+p)V*MoaPwwiAKxdMyQj)ClY}Qh zJ_@`ab;Sk+=K1flKMnQT?$bYi(K~hOq52Ow9yhnPo!QGE;Yq-G-5mOD*A$k&c%kz4)`Wp5tf;`RNHXJ(R_ z*kd0{i9Kj*?1Liq6eZL$whBsPkEIM+VkuFyv6NBTrq-w;_CYbKh<$7|){eEYRjeKR zFE{sf;^dj>`}_Ij57*q+>zsSex$ASE=eduJ*Nf$&e#_&?%vX+QCh%*vC|OpQn3=B} z&l16}7`J0*UTbE)Q!#$H!T%*9&%k^MnfW#aKMnkgGun2@Z_3P%1K*5PyIlI~s(wRT zAU-o+r_dh{{?6MCrxi40<}1fDEBH;X@2piQHZxy2o+W|5asTq(g|*>)vCgIOjE{3- zU&w%V>V-V*3uWMM&KLVax)suI(b59_DAK=9&f~NWJUH(6CVN}14ldsU?JC9$elorb zOwUc3JaGlMZmBOy6sCZ zD*XCgw^I5`{rq(4O6_T1OY|G%^#(mZ)xT=bshRx??4v=S8R@Oh-!ISh!J=Jw&xzth z&s){sc(IXEUsmP2pm)Npz8T~P#Yc>LcHpT<^R2Y%`Ey*>9I`&?J$COo`S;nfMPjom zUum!2E#u`)?zdA}epdFH!GAF~x*xSYZm$Zs9qH|U%dbWU=6CTE`jqwU0WY~|{ZlcL z7W!B817-V?dIHZUqW)7MPtTpHR!M)j@1h^XB45ahe&ECNiC4zyTM2IVyGu4SJNJGQ z;1LPn(|tfqrSeC7WoN%3JP|nE2P`*KeIxpa`wH;LB;dgt+kwoM)=__UJY6;TUPd4e zG0DI^6J`IP_S5TZjW^tOsW0%Hy`rC`L0;fIuB4CJ^~MF3p-O!su1bAUk6NYu1^ovp z#Wewcb6p~?Hsr&Ox95@JTs(T8u=wUq?Uc`h1?nMmU2U%=P*|jg$7!_g(GapPAowiw5ON?eemG+zR)S^ z!`x5ev`&6faM3cpPIiJ%>$oE4n)QeX%(sx&cz{!V_=cH=M>0GWIMwHSUHy}zfQxpn zjF%t$qGiV2iVn=v{3rOzcfcp_ee(6lNt3yc^L|MI$x6HcbeB$A+D&$ zB*i|yzTNP%S@0rdORL&zpUp(+6q~E%_-lLd^ zI4b=Swum^!g6~C2GCurGJ_){vqiUVBTl_8jOsOZ^EAeheE`KdB@e_6#!Kd$^Kib{3 z1iw$FuPXIfz*}Et*SoZy5b}29Q=BYiU8mXlAatLM#se4l^&G>_Wp$s-rl{8x@L{jo z2!BHN$qt*#1)T}}Bib*`um8950^iH>NdMxHp3>zj&hL|1kWc>oa=!NmG|mYB)3BdS z<&B!LIdsmJh<}n|{LWUc!+T_}kat0U3es9vUXG^r6O1qN(~&0TeXQp9*+@R&uB_)@ z?G4LvdDVL9pC0L4O@%vjpH0~3`XIc0IBvK8B`fdv4HD0BHxbmU=4j8I=7bl zm+`e+mz6y6s2P`cK`sSpx!IlS(R+EqKAk$;zT~<~gL9*>k?U7&kbcg4Q?L}*pANlx z;5YBbH_gfVv9i4w!D~|cY-ifbrg(^cs%)RqjwqEM?bHH!CsKh2`eme>{T*nhZ`TPI zq<=KOcK&3)iTWy)E5^GNMZZX6`b3;ecz=VgGmdUuU!CN`=7IlHd4cS|KIMHHx}P)SO8-7tJSUv#K1~wz>Qnuzbw;vOrb55+K8+XrqqQ4d%HlcUO!sLr zz<2l7^vU6gW8PFQ#M)(O-bQ_;fq!-3jnu-dEb(8_E|u*=6lR zVBh|PA4+`!6@Iv&Hw9@rQa@6%N$`aq+AY#Q@pr%vwXRIKoeRGIIrz>aaE%FkT6gWb zm#ut+UZ64#R^U`$#R}c56{!!x!8oPkyWtM-?(cC_i~=68?HOI$QA%@6v&8-*Mve&S z30)6(p{LP1anlZXzH2TR!Vf?4sh_W(Gop=@mUim4O26rSz)qz-G1oedMFhk$%*P13V-6t;-EYU8UU&(knP~<8pX-vHjV= z6ZWR|k^Y*1msa^_WoJ0~n}qv|@0D!2j>p>pIg0nYOI#G>4RlE)0wW?M!naA4;y(ZwE*~QxYuXtO*i+G)< z&i{(H1H72sk?nZAttc-U`0tIM_;av$yV1|nfWOq;Kb#YIp#Ec&=ZI#2_s*9qTISNJ z!hV9Usw?Z4-Xn?KA>;MQ7iH(=4r7b<61WaljF%?x1y!_{(7JcB?8h6A-aEznZxZ-4 z9u99@RS(7Zm5Hy=Zvwx^k{mO{^_L7=ekVi+KGOZ0G!%G zHC2h2Y)n28IIR~;UVM`$JHwNJ(|p+PblyL601w3CnN~O&_)$vh!h!vVd`e%r6#a_g zmIi$Xc6F<)X?iX=WD8uiNBT+cvt3<1V4D8}U7XM@a6NE(Unt*{-0z&M8|s%4M&R_m z(3ST$9bIo+5PUo;ARlP~PUkP(sdK;2z^XY5k$yXHx=-NzdE1#bqucH#+y$J*g#x3l zG_(BMv>5Qn6yWr|&z~a7)opb1N*95PIMMS|l!~?_eu3x80_WV1q)-L(c)V1<%eYK= zTE5z*quSt@EbutwQ@nERn-b@84Act+0yhJvcxBslI3>6LZ18nEf!lynyvBF%z1}qI z+BC>VI)PKXESL5@cdmNSo%DNvQ@ln;?Cp8K#4pN#}Uur`C9=)&6;``>A^jpB6nD{98E$u*`4gJLW zLOIS0P>la+7{8s6PeCehvA#%Se~bAmW4vrvw0@=Q%Dl-l3x^h5LOAdf`b}jepX|}@ zmvIodK^2uFEn4E)L`L98?PYq)Pv4Eu$vhEHWw{B^^EByHO=Y>k{R>68LX+6Ph=-gV zDXsB5_?zq$e6fGwMZT1O>p#7hV7Vym&p*oZ6X_CM@e}?#6?SM3g!`Y2eN~!w$o~%Y zO=q(5pUO>uo@s5?oX^UCWx2whp#PAwBPE+X_&byT$d~>E?la(fV|0IaQ1t^Ak`exT zl>U0(`YZY+-47!9b0^=dc`F~O*7pu?FO$v zsh{6b87HC71l*1E+U^_)6cf>ol>P`iL>vv^ry(Vo4E#+#3BG7Yx`SbH2;KKTmr?T@ z!BH()TYbyw3#-L{19nB2!KeA@Y`3dbC)azB4m{EZoYwKq=T%ExT=mhrB<}=H^JmhW zJOjtx?ea0<9^f>8Ueo;cq4rLz(EG`$z{$Q*Q~Wz$F8L+6_7nE`fs=jh8r*F3^MQJg zNx$xp^q1z(TiZ8Wwcf2A-0KU-N5%oKDFgz)#T_R0)Xbf^Qv6@wHt47Ih`y9N$BkDv zo&b-qL7x0G6xjXMz84Aa6Yc~~{%st;YiDf53bY=I^Z+OS`u#BT@ZIKhPmz2oaPsfx z0>_tsUGpHV$0Gc|$-jk7FY8)q25p6Wr0%fvzn;hl{PZo~zjeEQ$uZ*pVjPVFPWKz= zyqa2Vj=xkspCI^Vlt=qaX2_=|{`Er^=hbLvUN`NadVaIh zrAVVdrG4IYQjY9P1%KWrbq7QR<~#li)R%^?=d{>=Jydl;@d(Vf0@ojr@u2c*Z@&9$ zByi!MvOFXBs@8KpjWY7mqx0fOF@rC7f%vNJeI!ojm&6a5(}^x>#5hLs5lpcd$L!GKLQ3OU3jXGNF^;8$ zmm7LdkM6%)yX%&bjIc|2KYd`yvnR;}(Jo?-Nx$QfCjYTUzBDiW(j*{1EuXCK-W5mf zkJ3vGLZ0?z62a@DE%qzl54GYwIC@X*$eR^!sQ!dJy{DE8`HQ6y?ry*Z|U6wzj zN5&4?XB6^Dz%!6;)+SA({Y6pF%IDl-k4t~|o-Om3?$1hZWV=@0---u+PVdoW>Dr6< zqFp4RT~N%e;0unhkKXel`*J?s)R5Vi>AAsV$RB$6Vn`PDWxD^C2L2IUt*1)+M7vYk zC+!N@4LNNp>L01V#k$kX{to!|pYQkd47@dj&)*5r;4k2J=z84_J;#psTla9;tgC_` z>cxZnRGb$^{k%-sA4A_ymD)rc1LyK7;+)Ft3+Ri^q%Tgkmj<)?_osbA(kJ4g)FcEtjQwj_>ymWc8^WtgSar7a zSIs}EZoee{6!I#(_tXq{v3)DQ>d^Zm2k_8$h5dtNIi{{@Ds_q^2j$<9`6U1SzhBmL zwY(5~-Y|e`EWqiycjMJk!}#<4rjycNx^CUr>&CH2TS&jg3Y_Mf`n6t9iDI||IL&`| znx^02*Trt&w4czzMQ_>IJ z201QwpSf>Swp8f{{VVuB)Snh|2FP`)Z@8B|g_trGd>87M+G_&%6-+}{W%YiNUBP#N zzc25)J2_pM^;^KFbw)Dy0}uMF{E#vfK ziEg*V`$_yK^t-_)e@)=$*qBmKXW?wAKc%RwAL1v1|HrZBeZ>1o{1=R;g6{_Z;F?2? z@)>bHYW@ks-}d+C&P@qQBj3H=uE$zSam>2Ga!`Zn=?68{C`so=+hzpBZ?>*D<+ z{u6w?!hS3GciJ^F1UCnnfEdT(E6Dap<46+tf+qT>y_AffceG4zX4M~S})k7X1D=3y?@j;d&(gV!%e{H{Uhsu0!yPAZUs*7AN`q< z{b>xt9l+`Rqr2U&9M&@24V=cG-dC!Z&c<*ra2kK!SEcRB&Tt=a8h^@8FvjIzxc02{ zpT?h0hF6}Oli>#7H2&1;TK1n@3^xI%b@HQU{_VNn;*l9;WWDT&R0V%WjK(JWaxS9l zw$OTr>Tl@OLmpm#Zs@1@^xy7_WAztlEhqKUL-={uwp}wvH!^scChDKwizWR9x4taK z^=s3l|D=DQS*POq)5=TzyJ3I6Q8ng#8?|!1a3-KXGR`3JJ;1k*=sdMxhkp+N*U-Ku zmH*Ywgf+Z;hobyNyWEp``L2pm|6b^iF7ji~eLoc#PUUA*lK4L0`OnT&Cs{UsLgkZR z)IOHA>G?RqF3{lk5bZNz3Gc#W~e;O{xxV&ig z!d}pxneSE1p9$c5C)PS$$d;L}oIf4lSIvF*NnuN7zHB0N-%K1}J#JuXoyqE@g?Ir1#z{T~9p8YNQf$OH6hh4Z2Tso!l z`6#_$2ggCR!zgijzu{8CxH!6=7xFgJhxbNibS$?t!W5F%IDykV^I5N=lOur#`fcdF zcn^4~TV;8d{;ks}3OuPzu6xqfNZd?(r0@K=|BV{&MQ}bnHyOJBaaqR0e0W7yje(dl z753QXNd2^KivwSGGctR0=Jz8)`zL0^&jS9$jr(83Xv6QXi26yux`*B;ae^-_2*gvJ zoDd%GaqoPRkHtH*Ut3Z&XFxM!XZ?HB6aoL=|wr@f~Wt_M#0 zh4Xry{P0oh^*-Q{M&Q{*M&K9c%URrT^HwAAe^K8akDQmNy^QHPMHhwsDB@>uY=wEz36ddjRk|#X+FR0@ zt4(7VPV=SyfsAvzk}F3?Sl-H;b4qz5^xQo)cSEH0El%y7^nAJP)!z{e*XEM)cE}HY zn9Uf)a2N9Fx^9p@F-gtv6yWr}+KI#ii!}^S2TtoUd&3Ju`1dU=z*SeI9sa*}_o44w zhI{@tm5f}{PKih z`FK3ZUwTh;%BdRjxxcB9BY&UWR=K#p9^ihYx@DG!S@|2ETiU0)D$|Sg(z|EnuMK+Q zz?gE&5^=_csM{{zLUHjm#<@q(5p|d{{hEAxH7pesXgI9uE(2Khnunww%f;9yZ{* z>oOiOzaN;LRXoh##eug!@|hl%+4Q~KChA!- z<^7T7GZ*-Ke%SjgPkd&+a=c6h-&tkZnUd9}5G}C!yHjww6Z+?-_rj{`^%0Z8RCmLE6bC1t5qt<8IjWdunm86U7~&+$d~eOpI=D8 z^O2UZ((dVz6(&TI0Z4`484AC>OrLmuBQZwGQ#+&a;`qlU{E&QkFH>liLpY%Vz zx-+k`T;ad6T=G8yl3;!IxTh4*$7;B2;2)k`SDG|xKWY7 zMY~bnr}Tk8x^DXJD7`4Cm6c#Xw%v2inUx{quHe~i2N+8kQaEK|{+jRx6Y z={|B2_<|9rp9q?V=()@z9iwNySMjqWg!{m!>zKp>&F&RF_|IVAk=nb`zk(to@cVl1 z8}D^%>|*hMq2Gt+3P^s?#;%b~A6*U719+qf^7L+9Y;ynBd(K*gcu=11R0F1tVO?l@E6Hb{gVDCPv)$dQsZJz z!hH(;n+JT|XYQ}1LiTI#N&kZn)&_*!_3pNKGh%cqH~8akj$fe7+&-hN z;M2UB2EKlM%M#f#x6fz;_|!hN|H$|>&he^Uc18OX<36>|2oW&+M7#B(-Ni%Rid0a< z{)(ObE!r8$$41Nc{zKA=)DlmN((^?c8eeE0sJx_Va)e%JlkJS;^*A@^o5ivHiVvKb z06a90&^Y(ve!=22j);EjhdsLc(%+0fr5*hSe>{WclVD+ie+1tHek#&9$epNHtd4SC z3F@CM_0c|>1^l0K?=6zWdpn_VBB7SF$4Pe8xvbIz>Vf=~{za)Q7$<1IBn5o1qzZ3iib=p1AWYG_l@%Ml~?7>ezL}$?t=z4(SpAP=U?xi;Tuk$=8{<;S; zK7;3$S((*&9u$9GFJgV~M?DxJA6oz5Z_W>{|B#P*i%jV$%Z(8kfnWD`){i>--m+j% z6z$3je(L}6xd;#136<+(<%#~R#6_9HkJyLOj>LF*eM^4CBcJpMzVO40eDQa19N#JB zTZoLnuh{EhQ*EEtZzTRN@T63!m!ALs^LevfE4%y_T>p#l!2^A?UpFl2K&|h`{!{|; z5vjmw9+}>D%GTm>721=2KX9@;rO1V&gOf@H=MfP{-6Lrqjg$5h(w@N|WHjc!34Ma^ zguYn3M-&J7WtBVAttdea{=|5wuPFN;>9T+?2qIqe-C*%|;5^uD9^iAPJ#dOV@e9O3 z<2^6!N&&w5%MK$*r@)gQN<0nttNG{p)3ukt=k|_f;Xl8#wj9C{DdBNn$+(AUTVstuygX`aUL1r zf92X7ss|zOf?NvHH_@}EQQZnWxx5{6G@cG@emqZvUNVGz7T_+V zpBH*Cjph}BtB{|9^u(s4pK6%All%uht^Jms(F|8TmG&oGlyNvcx9cGO99;t9rU$QY zp8VajGkI!9M&Lip|73FxhFg#y|F6_Pz%n>CC&NkJ4qlDwZ;s|-xC{B|kbnKr$-}uB zPVy<>8Gbl^I1g~qpXfW(s=!aQL)E|1-zl#iED(9(C*nx`Ne4Xj_m56coeMmj^aH>6 zG_r_J9~2MDlN~1Dg{N3<7yXIW)uKeQ97U{UD39rO!7#dKK!LvR{cfyO!}X{cn=frFLB7H{$gG+s|D{bZp6Fi<0Hfeg5r%LcqoPNI5@wz+cwmaq+@B83+1T@RjpZD)>id zcO9fy_6OQkWQ1~l61v2^@5DTzdM@qKSCDBO{-!z>{9wOBzW6&(FKSEc@Or&CbMXv; ziJz!92kEUMgmD}f4*f;RyftlPsdj7@--mqIcc)!zVUrPVzy6A)AuYb+TJ_C66 zeEV{9`%R>DxXdEBg%KIS>8Ql-I8b`E-te ze_gZbS=na=@5^?x9Na!%TzLEnelhwix6iGxZ;7UrjoU}(p?JaDm%hC=w=dNGf!`jG ze+92!(-!GJ^{-OfpVOmc!T1|qOWcI^)1`Hp3@%UQo4_kxaqvCvzZUscq(i^FTa5Xy zalkGI@Y@Rtz0cRHKGdrl_^g~CC-e2H3Ah({#`^gWX`3S0eqgr`xc_9y0kmEfxE8qf z4f;X$0ab#VQ-Mkl>vp?h-EII+)KQ=w{_{QSq5T4{SO*?<|D0}e1oge$=deQ0rnFr( zs+KsuLFg0hH3|6v-NE0Hofp^PzXI1J11CGyZXVZ|p5qtxQ0yqBSO*`whoXR<2-YsWIO(~ErKeZS-J@7&H%`v-4O&)Bf@RBhRaiIRt zb;g0iR5wCCj&SJt^M~&zQX3PvnQ*kHGLPDnc-xNx&p!dDIBP5Jc|h$!$S1%rvj5te zn9w*UuD5N!%63LLr6Y#yKS_S_cz94=D$?&;cJ0LdRYjrRu`bX)JRSH*nfwWR^n|1S zC%oubna9HjoZ8p9ey36>9szs)^PGynpfIBEpnk!E0_BA2-41=}^LnSfzMpHAAOvu= z8~M}^=U(2_Tv{2#HD2I!KlI}Df5Xlb^8weLk@350xE#&LKMQcJTE^q`l{H&BsnA|Nf$Hx&K;Cc>jNY(P9s`UxoNMsC?Ve=DeMl6!KmB zKM8!7NB%_lR^Zf5%)dMj`<|c;&x3f7MyW66=JK9XvfkX#GpyvVkGX%|lM=Uq*STq} zE8IRW*@rZD^ZhA&{?tapf8dw;s6wx&2IB|+4dB&Y@o*21p969x;2Xc$S)0et0Ne_E zcJ7ag^ZKXuL-X^9l*JvmemCT({R}y6@6Ppmfm8d*)^B`YuAkZutrKQ0PMXQ%tBsNV zQ~NO$^6ugBH2|meg|1QFA$)yd0#4K%V>w8Vaxo&(M^b)R>ahUV6z)jvhtiTPxyR|<4 zBac7TAI0ZdxxO|YA1maj{(dam^dOIq131NROzj?}xPGcXS_gjCYpg5Gf5=n)O}M>L z#qIY2cccGzXnA`Uw@;fby#LSmK1VFKkLu5h`kQ=i{WrXRObU75ha+{|J}Yplzm^k^ zSK{_j{n5Vj_)R-<^7?Z_p00m>$|zGZto;D@BFz}`Ds260K)w&@yk>^oJib(a6rU;O zFYM;_8M4dxQ2lkRR(vv#p9whC-_wl!_jvrM{%D|MRQ-ULPxWWTb;ii-U%%k>r_B*w|CMv)-o))Q0H^xwW$eLmn+ zKV#cp()04Eezb`1r`szea{CQAWqhc9Qp`10@c5a4TOt3^isJ>jeOBO9{_FX_#&i3q zetf8(ZcVI5`Sqn+A)mUYS_y8S7dX|=5>-kBw~yL4>2I9;W0-!rex>(5Cr@4eH}8Mi zTxkDDznPdYm6vZqKKWPi%%K^)d=J(yv|e2`;!ImU{yHGxU)H=D*H3Xb zfw$_TSA%)|Q~9*NF!V~X(D!P@{6ytDAm8djy$oKyTTy<^ooOCkKKbnhuXMX7fAI3j zJ|FO58P7_y_NPvMSFWF^&W|0q9(-m%tl)%whCCP_;Qz>sIxl(rOu!wOA9`LHwUyT& z?QdDZ`}F+jB<`OB`3BT~Gta2sxqn*VZlo8!m@|_1Un~6b0>7Jc*jhgRh1x&xbsxq3 z#>W?m54EqV)iQpiSaAPo{V=raUxhht(#iPH{M2=-Js0;cQAFZz8C4*@}vLd>pvgz$v?Fr<-@G5FDQ;b%~(2>>o?>@|A(IT z!`Ch3@izgd_@BCe-pJ!`1y1%?(oG!4<4@zC3H4~&b*B{f-wk=Pe{9hbe{uV~z^NYn zKd)QI?W6uh*9Siqs8x>Fk2at5kLvfYT7M++`l0q?059fM>QinX?Jtx3?`s^*dH=9N zj-K1u+UJp<_YXQh*#TZk#=_&=KC<78>zk@08b0B;S7HClaNb|Rn7?Nt5!ZLOd%#vu=ITIY`&_FmZi@KoRw=ayf!=)vp3PdMV}jamDK z*MqJ=csp2lFGn*TXA|V(z|%ba)4tnc{f8;{HGRIO2p}!soYJ z(3{(D1MWeZw}K;v>OqWCsS5d((?<{C_R%_r+C%&jV;kO1bOojVWJmqQkDl;$5(k{x z(S{a-)^Y#Lz{!5??Fx6eebmn#Xm8i66&=Up>r}|kzdZaTx6cEd;`naTtH9Ix@+aCM zjVY9p?}7cMe!T{b=v#prlWb3+eJ4Nko{8Q5b(L(l&kI^0o@#v|84s$XKh}NOjZ}zu z8-bHQCy)JIhWQiWUoYoXOHP?qA6~1PVR3^hq~8vCYVTK~s?6g0UBD@xXZNpeNVW)n z^Mg!jKKwmoXp^Bs`h7kk@LlSjfj#&(y+)GOpkE=s)1iOCpSflgZ+6@$SiS9x{Ei1s{V>BfnSUQilK|XsP5NE;i=(0E^o4vPa2hZ3Clx-x`(YAr>c?|x z_c+4hs!1mOUr7BEHZ*Og!Tn#MKLviJftTy6t?QzJi~GX#UK`b026#X2>HI6TXYQ{B z`eI{cT+TduG@rNYRJ0!x@TP{Uy{PR8du+h1z@ILi(2?4xs7IQMDW$o4$k35J2lpM^ zb4dR|WR9qx2phh8=Z3ytj@BIha!%rHK@xZx@@br1JkHS2x?s_#z||SRsojn3(WoI6 zAnc7TBK@TL?b7MZzJQ&HW89F@cedA>4aczt08Ij$&UKkoEN1cv*vc1NKOR0+pT%#%~{iOaCJ)+7i z;tD(o@_O*f6mhhr`x*i_!w(~H`||ehi1z?Vgc?yR$^cthC6`Ufg9g6>O+q) z2>qdTFVw9i zT#tN`?^b7=p6W3Wr~e#pgZFise?H{D##;;YUbw&b!l-R`Qbb4s<*A*>r~5n6KaIVJ za0TP(0Z!MEu9TM>19k*|!roK`{#w;NY@g2$oZ?#O=ikEi>2$?q94KzzS8)Bv<4N-u zT}Rp9#J?}Yb4O&@O>|GP9+-!9tYe6Jm*(qVrWhl zxE1--kA7}CcXt68AaEnvr31XByN>=w@1lsfP#d9?VlM8i_v|$!IIc5)Lh3J;SFO5NzlHaloggYG27xFh5`u=F%IpluyX?UHwp3v@Fo?jx{cn&5&rnluS~#ow+0t1iUI^~1#Si2 zv+thK^sbG-9mv-rt}{w*zFC~f`>?;~25&*tLx0gZA3=HGUf=`Qud)Om3J>TIIE^c` zKY2`bK5YL%TT1#*<4W((b2aAUf&n;$*>N78jW+2QJN;RG+=3wgS3@7p&iKQG@0+<>%q z>p5F_`Py>QFDgIj?(W;Xd|LO!A`Uf6mYBrbgGnL3Xn=J-x6cZk+SR@R`dr*T8lOo2 zAFT_1Px`ZJ-(+Xrsgu5@F+HpH?M1no0To{H{^~}42GU2r)pT)tW6OufqsP`ReaK$% z9FDTT(R#GU@^1IDvM2Oh5A-hB-|kCpj|2InN3&x^8owTP1E>DFqu&ENZ=YV^97eqXTP=R^7?V(%cJCp6C*D#-X;eQ|ZBX6l?tBK84X zZALz=-zPS0^qAL+4LFTc{Y(`KP`pGv)Av*fr+EBVT%FM8L0Wu#-vboatn~fA#>I5# zQ5mFv$4t#b&oN}B@Bi5jp~sB$Qe59Ayk4l?lU-$(v|hl!&zo>i?w8U&NSP&dZ$`0w z4jN}upx#u0lFN zH{=B`pT;dMMyx{df*i2`aKVJ=Jsi^k4f|3I9uWg9zUvI z3-q*Vu=)TmpTxcZO@=yHnAeom>_EY<5(n7a}`)7w< z7t$_M5(;qpQjkyai>~%~KQEuwr77_Lw{^bTJU*&-rTn-q9D`mqzZZprmMx!HI__31!=&ht^H zp}am*sa%X(Nw-#S;PvSTPUB+7lmA}h^{IPb`cL-F^PYQ;+vkCN9C%a8@9Le0*=K?M zX5dMMuXYjNK@vYvpS0$pl-3l1E83o7k0bO@Y=F<}(+Pba9VmXM*X{*DHUg*nB#YWL z-NpU20H^iL_0&}=stXbSRFrE6Z(@V09r-?r1M5>4@G|>iit~LG1Mn2!xr(*DL;EN~ zKaIb%?)P6g-IT9CR8^&av<`0jW5@fnE)?>5;50tgslB@i#Z=(5F3rGo!JD03hw|Aw4v)mp(@@YNR|E}sT zw};|IZ*s22U}iT z+0X5Z15WFqU!Uzg&h0Y;r|~mlXVcL4ghly&*k=Pz_fDD9S&i>Wu+RN^;lJEIkHWqg zx8CWj|YZq;i_P@qU8~6pg)R>*sc&S5qPVh{+65058=|X!>0sd%ltuB1LGy+ct{!^ct zZE3s=wuhS1Pa1#jTjvkw<4-!q6+L+Rk0%Z0`<`y>Cm4bIPnCGX_dP8nhy7rG_P#6m zzNZ`ea(3`;T-5d8`<^D?F5nyQ*7}z3d!`_t_D%2iQ~%2MJ$={@O$Tq>u!@CBVt^L@ zYjaBfRkdW=u-bZ$9(Z7!{?GN7n6LR=PEGV z1bHWTv77%GY+$%A8ukHqU2ids7Br&#RE7TI#UACT#N-{2_k-6vBDq0jhP%~Lzb;;; z`Epcqyvy)7l0 zzp&qh_fP3urzB=?;5>*39qen`y7#om2w9MbhYvht1%W`E)fok4`Kr3oZ_S#nKhQZ) zV%?$ihwRMCe^GC-&=ZgJjCE}z@>}3mpAa-WFwdq=+dJ<2G_0@v?>zc_b&_M@NHaa>zZ#)0IG zpUqvahP732-z(RWOWq$DoT*kw8Nui%?gWO+XLZGzmWCMTOm+lVPs!S{lf2p)Z} z;)bS5>6py?=+xa(zaOa^a`S)BFN~t{*rWYG#^p_^ zsSoK~XVE^C<;R0JIbVm`IZXfW@)N)}uWi;lC+eA`M146>z5~4Ps@E%;3p`Q2vVSIn zr>?iws zp+DuIlrw?<;SWth@9lBE^81O2;2-Q#=?2|rC%&j}U8V4PbAvB9qW>!6=e#8Oix(R9 z#sp^#(kA)J_+>!f_%=mWYK?EX;(tQFGJb|eG9Hbp4Jef@E;C;lzXb4yTz=LsyFN2t z89xX3v#MSlNBfN=CG1hgFB$w#Jf4qfzk>Lp-znoKFfm@G!EYbrsqMrzmj3bfE5@rh z>&1e0Bk*{YMr8wEUoxCWdMOor`UT2~cCvCrd#CZ7#zk76Tv_^!U+XyUPvgdq z{J=x!iqbe*|MLT#BG3+my{0BIepaM(uIQ_e%KekoxuRO|3`iYFi@w)vOq5=f`u3Mq zJd(k$G3nkPw4X^5f=}lKry;IB@DCpBTP&+{MdQ%lX#E-6RQe-y2I8kqZYASF-@Tc? z=W8deCq;a%#K-#U(_?Ms@pDBTz^NX(jQMFbKUdTZJanJo-LmE=tTTjuFK}8vn&u@} z;OB~(;GY$#5B#6nKf03DxuRO|3`n)jq`#$Y#cKVpb495=#)H4;gNj4`*SVq;e=GQT z_7`|3t8+yu{=9#P{%V3BNsy=h>c!ujFZydb@~PgOihj7L+=Fz1iJz!fQUG_^C>BqTGo3dBs z&sC{Ciurrx_Ct-ie7ZuuaoRt#X?_#-r2tp8kbZo&C7X`sv!H*-kFO%HKQ?_ew;z8l zi}u-!;9W26A3*b!khep>1$fDFas6odD8@^tVji=Dhxlu>o8@?9fu7TCmWG{=nF2oP zZ_)6V^tbv0_0ve&ZG`-W0?Q`z`cavr-xlyn)Je?8>L*lxdhkk5ofY<8qqcFl{vy3} zx43=_}(Ug7nC? z#5MGs0JR6f_rcFp%uDIuM-SSvhS~-3MfpbHx({WXep%xAlD7{!hsg-M+Qu!NdHbOK zbiyy)il5JMJLC)zQh(yZS82TcxPa4sSe4#gKjZaF`{`uoUxdaNBik|#A$C=>k=9uMEMqlyt~Z!rQAL{a2hAR z)}ATJ?Te@HU7)_Q`#*V)x33h)Q~P~7z*>j5-*g3@{gXM#+&+5#K-Egdq2=h6CT5@7 z(kXm=vgZ6TcyCO!kzjnG-w63H=3aQs_3M#uL3*nA7oTzesD0Rh&p(un~`^A9A|3l2?Ck z++wF&^-C-1XPs^Jyyb={@`(H)x`1{m}Z}clJP`#2tg0D)H_R@T* zGt0O@=1@$ zwDn)Q-yNve|9sx0-_YT`1`X=TkKYsV4_)V}+DSjp%)S$!?XK&UuqlA6(30F;#Kvis$#&7;7|02|G)9HL7x-pwmbDtvv_9GM{)SCc&0#4I?^7c8~31i z2JHOLcm>{KAJo6^h_I6^dA#D<%XnF*?d_KCAG=>TEaGKBKD}pI>*1QVG8%IJv;(L1 z_`%F>&8QuUcq!LwF7THQGGCx^oa@t3c}QRW8o!y^L%<$QI@*gLc*fU@W7+r-vX|;t z>%8IO`r|&9ep3BTYIHUq)vwU618zq8SNHDA`S@c)zq0{vV_$iYzaN%@^_mm7spjiK z=>8&}8V~a6{#$3;uHAG`MBo<4r-Ik5aQ$L*Up?qQt{42khc*8AAG)6|>Yv7bN@=d> z-Rn~dgRmpiPvSbrcx-Pn$eYdT58i4NVU?%kf0$ zO+tFO>dwM^UiWsB*G1a-a(vqFi4Bb(LcjAXnV*dN9ecn3DVEoh6YmcbelFhhCC4*R zZfr;C-=IZDF7bKQI5k}VS66B*=JN57OF(KbasCFyGGL!Nsj8GG8Q0Tu!M!LEWMO|2 zsVcE7aynGY%T9JN!eP`z||B>%Nx@Yduu=6qPXm4)dGvCj7hObM!$S3>m zZtiI0>k_(7^?{cyWtfAlOG5KD;h)Tl@5ONs?uV29Gwm;K;QpHuWZbmS-|@-gb=*H% ze_O%ZF|SEgJ}#1f4#-zocq#OLhNxdR!WF06hbPySyjF=i=`j}v8+& zI?)RMYi~7g8_002x+o$a&{ib$W`{_R`xP7#)CH>{^ub$5J+i<_1=A-z6 zHSIjUR_Lek>CY*nE3x??w9n=M??vMFfqcBD=ND-F8gbR+3LC#5NBHO?7gzK4=LYUW zs{XS0hrEB9kgx47uo+`uV*za2RrcCL?CA-`<3yIPokz_y6H?2@DkFLPtjMSM{XXgDNEW})bFoxUzn5&Yna}5L$desq z(#A#7`ZqZL0jK(1oZjjU_uof2>|gqH=ymQN^&bb?LCYHzzT@rB@QL(~>^C1;61E;Q z0jGVu(t%^ixqYCBsa*Fxdh^8%9)B-zYF~q9 zc3#H&mk&6#pNFN7^y1}fdrJRk9rBm1WFxu`5%Hyc4g+|zqx<&f>#5LrI*6YMyhjBG zKgnu6<$yg_@Orhr_6u+CR^Um%qhpTe=lxj=JQ?_CXEi5dr5z1 zKGAjL^P2(nY5-pS=Y~c3{OiU1VgmlEV%}r?x{Jman%{DrjvB$^X~Mik^Z&u~c^$m} z(!At`{;fYwKFRwpt)Hw|Kdl?`mxs4+ALK}X4%PEW3ScmPz_q=l|Jh4TX~^4?1GoWr z@hZkmRNq40gnU{bl*yM?jK|lcSl{GL@0!5NcR-%(A8al69rxc2ob3O3>g_k&e=Be= zQp>(HJ+D8CzX5pjX3q>f{@Om$?{w^g9!cD!;{F+clYjYbbE`j5SZdHHVO)V{0cX#68DpT=)$AN7`}Y~k_oDeU)rdv6A} zPy4C#pW0dPt)I8%_R)Ak>)$2kD}=s(9;|=JQ~iu>F}WtMUjuL}(t0h9*W>Jp>cR4+rqu@LV6NL-ER}>9F z$a|1a`$8wb+Bmlu!;`+0>ri?Q?qUd_kr&j~pX(sSA>pYwH#8TqM5lMBrc z-477<$06U3v}^kx+VXkEkGSdjOaJrdI`u6dN1edqfZw{)|93u)CSo7W4E*_o&zJIX z)P{Vj|C)8bf5yi_+NW`X7g_YKjgRv*j}gA+M$`q4t8U7;lm0*3uZ-dC!>=fRc9YRz z&m++IuNxr!Z>xD>;`KxR#X--ArPGtS|7OTh`QF17j&T3ufZLExAD*u+_dgYSoxsnu zj~LA70T1$N9v=10+Hrgwr}J^C{d6hwTOHnh{E#R6e)(xp2Ob~YKU z=;$?J>ufXfb%UiJL)Uz?hR2`kkK%K%XWte)KGeTbF-|PaaWL#0dh*K#{mm!c9F$f6 z(xD&BO?tYNk3SyBk$=AEz0-L6bOKLB+NRT17jK_trXcX^|wKeBVA*z zzu^A+QLp4*@|4>5`S@-odDve$&(5E?{WjoazbD(*-*WrofIE>EtM>Ow-o7dRWPiWG zh5q63PlcSPfb^rx<+(Swe}3T9eh1fV@-Fv}`i~RwxizxWzr20M4V8LnA2WH@+KIe< znt`W6-qCz?O&)(6a4NrU;}$Ks{j`p^LH_q{Ys0>i;ZevZHay&h+m}k^_mS&}=RJSz z$L*ti7}8&3>(-aN{n0)Q^{?#f8ua4*E6yhU_u@NZl~zR6;QI<@;8efO%#G&q{$~SD z?WaJeP5XKKaRR4(n2P>t=lJ{0v=8F}Z`Ya=q4%%FeJ$FDA^%dr%YHTf6vct>OX`68 zk-ElL2>Y&)AMw-=lYW=Te!l~6&raY*;P>=XI`Z~L?UmZY;j#Cc@b*CCg%0bHs8)|V z@%o_g!Ug@Ehi`hy>zn3dTF;Dizq^*NXVM`@^|86~zzW>{6yU1i(m(6|8SnG{Xa}wb ze(>j^t$2GiBA?pxxAklIxc@X>kbkjLwuOC{$qsq4zkOnhdfa{&aI$}A&9f$MzXf;- z()GRj)8&FntoJDXdf=PC)s5xxSB;Q<(|FP0*uHbzKRs~ruYA+$6S#jgUQirMuR4}U z?JQV6-)tw>}J8FIu3V`t$VRJ&y462&g~X z!TW7cq1klbm-lBX-vwUW2uo|SllNyM@D!v+I`j{_Poqb^A8DEVe=p?mPN8^xF5{B3 zdG)aQo!V2VzRDVFb9w5|bbVAJHa+Y+9TaC9^q>8E(1xt~b1KGzUS;3=g109RL1c zKXCGIVaX@gxqsB3oruqy%k{#}r;Zyf<3s)VW}ae&>&pJRs{^@sbP@9WFgOBUcRq<>b;bC=h*9{DLqdrhbx_FP0d z@~ORbPI$0``%nFu{3};!LqG1HeysG1>|fuz(qZnO5jfeuA@`tM+&&d>3#ETw54*2V z@hAH~&Hkb$wFA)~TvUDmX~(l$*N*Y}NdZp&{q@h0*S!9zKU)xo2_JVn8fM=(sh9e5 zzfSADynH=y7vx98v>eCFHv*^fFI^j>=jBs>HbQ=>UVnqf&#sWaSEtS!Zl4P{wX^)a zx3%N;QGX`=^$VP8!1Ysqruse6piW0#zp5{!|J0xDUzS^wRe#ol_x#RBj;#7Km2U*^ z((H}jlAXLir^6o$c!zF1xys|20^A9F_HTuc@_1T+dw@5KD&^+wneG$N^~<jH=OFQIk z;8khUel5SgRiT|Yf#=y}9m)5PbQsS(z@xr@HHhDbNL7?SVf>zH{62&S^PeBQMSJJ; z=Jz4uFfZuFOZ%6XeZ7+ILx}!p#QG=>_>D5(jO6?OX5^Fq)7L-U$M^r!vCg%D_u^Xe zK)(NP!8+Cne9q)5ZTWdhI$UpgfXABVRp93-r7Fr#&Q*OZKTpYn>wiCZC*B+4rW+u_ zzc^fX>n2G5H-75a$j?(s#r|0w@E@{&d5xc^WJW&SCn_>(RgxYZKtwH6|3^!w6$pbv+FOU8zg9a98=g+7uQA%xZ$j}eP6Wo3Jk8Is*aPLoh zL1i!r*cG~OWcSLpJbngT{r}$#P%o z^!P@X`ST$OxSv7e!t590Quw%Fm?+Do=SyleI2HEY5G`;M(poPUhkZZU2m7qR2PCX- z&c`hW@@X9I{7dOHelDCF@^0`d6`KAvoy!)lQfm`BAbyBXD(cY-{_)#8E|wJ)DJld% zetl(ZA?1DG|JdaEp>jk-D(Xpxa`clVe_5mN%;kZLa|M*|vkFMO=jwufGvsVY1s-@W zInu%Y4%ihse~HF%dcXfp{&&wQ-|rWEIuC&O$&Mk!FeHcp3;;0?^aP^A{KF0+V{Ww5plLczXR!&#arf*9|BKC zKD`&~SAYK%J5Nci-zoS1$ev@@KFdq?2>A@ilO5$-j>t`M6*%qhk^XPDylxqx7v2W_ z4ZVjHKSjpjVJ`Fck@_Gk;-N`Ee$qVI-;R%HoF2vSz&_BL6J=GZM5GyC+*_tLgybXi zW2KxmQl`0nYrf~ynlT>12e)QC-rmk_$EM(>TkibIXig$B?71O3i_l+f6UIi z(j)<=@u29;J^R!+|0v*pq<@{PUz&T{>vMN0YR>o=@zFSPNSx%;-YMN6Do#d7wEtMG z#4}KiXR(a)q~n|Vt1T4CxBN8lVyDV@5Pyd4<)48~wy>XQ@5=K?Opsf?U{khea~M5X zU&+v)2;Sb|Rd>fENS@F~`?`s!7dLn*oytXMO_}w@L!TGCzv?ZTlnp%5KIy%E(s%qu z#45Eub9u4Tq`zr+zu~y**hP&ob9oskCm#HlO@6tY9pz;e4=Z@f^0sM`1NBN;g?(w% z|H0dG{@xBcCrjY;9-!)+thdfbUgo58M1t~=vo4hQi;-jMQ2h%$7IDk~@7dgCFIoH2 zqyZ=WccMn+;`-wqGA^WlX#RcHF#W(2kRIH0Z4;fd5h!16{8ZXS{pU}Ezd7$eNsy!d zQ^=cV6YoFCz*VT1>xIgf=I4Q=0jKug<;sU+={%4?`Jw(pYtQ)nd5V0w;Z;>p2O>Tm zkL({b{{8N68XtvrEBcQoo5bU%%Qz(Dlz*2g^6qoBlWJ0?f=~S|#D`pis2vkE_AL0o z9Z2cCxqrrPdK8_RAMIKx<4MoGBt!16ZF9bfv1QVqsek&w*H??5sI`RiMLaSP&)Bb} zzYQIAKFns7Jl;R4J(<9ZnzrmQof}75g}y}Svw~+>yP;eT^ml<%|0I2*qFOaq$7L=r z8S-vC*VA!B-fkMy6E80byfmci7Zz~kWaEo6e%cw*&+5K+%jZ&zFIn|x1Ni0Nw3wMY zi~gL9ewF}URG9+j@_;A&rTLcHv+CKQk0XrI1A$Y2cSF8zUSnD$!@bD&o|Em+n5}g7 zD27vi_kp+k{zuJNe+cz=(%2JDlk(KM$0yiODJm&LnG;haSwFBqK zP=8%aZIb#e9_sIOtynU{ z(z49!)N881Psn?Q%DB;dyr@q5eNpH)LH&Qo{zdcN0c+adkqkG@lJOz=kB1H1M)IQn zXJ9_If~QK94MV@=V{#xKKM8Ftp4#<@!kIGk|AB+Ub1V_}nN@*sqLt5_oGm z56O`S?V9WteC7C+4F1vVeT(VP4>?~MZy)$;KV36CZ#*$&D(rP&+=z8b|Hi%?)iWP> zqI^1!ldiu^;1w}0oSokgu21ll*F#qD>umYrRe{*deC73868IN3RB2aG8_pNkp>(|# z!Jy!ISy)$jAs+=i1AlYAI4?^#Tly<#fjC4at(EeF_>L*q2{?=9EA z-4&TC3lVX&K_9gb)r)!^q8Lu^&p5#wxl;X(n&BSgyGKhqraSsK%?3OW*BCSDA1v`y z{5||tz3$mlq#g9H;QI$k9<3Yv;9oB`W_=D%ru~ALR0Ur@N5*GigMKG-x-#=U;M4aX z%;0NV-uN(=Gc(@_KAkgZ2fyw3F|OS9%zRZ{X+QBj;BQJ;J~fXmGhf;6)4_LtRpz12 zl9{iJk8ZB?cgm1jjq{o_^Of;2f?u}LfvNe7nfc22*uZ~SFFtqvxXgTId|co+|I6R7 zfIc%{8J|?}>!~lq7S#QJjD2@}lhyZsk|u3R8DR)z2tgFW5F@k73e(68$S6YzLZR%i zD>A~8I0*iuO_@D(cc7lX5MWE=)BHr`bzNT|Tw z%*TAVV&c(JaT1;eJPqY6Z9Vy|!V(?;o`v~qec4Z&7Lo7}a9*FE9MEq>Q3=;95ccu< z`q9NdPZpDKGw|H^G4H(J)+FIJ;M|`(4Zpj-xP&`_^ZInc`SiXeB-{<0*EO9#S$?>r zgr@=Lbz!kSnM+DZcmO!BI~wg+^zL&K9s(_DZJYF?r*Kqw zUzx^JH*h`=OMQBEXrGf?!^11##+M@NAKrg=zee3O;Tc82wESqSd^>4c3&)&LM zypoC9#|E6Qftdct{B(JPAu~|EA?t!@clO_b!bfJw{&Pc~{imDRzKZNWTlGl&*X`eN zqJHgP`8-`4Q0f2Y=P%_P*>>v$+ZR&l|8$$VMCk)>RA>Kaz7+OXrVQmc_1fTG+YeS~ zMgNn1sWl?&|EX%(88w#tI1RYg26^`1+&#C~?v7nFnQB9r-@}ue{e^!+Y@W&%K_l!5aq@y>izX0mvWP^W#9Bgl8h3{r=wJ`O~8$ zoZl;%1D@lX{d@Glsb1FSZ9~>Ijaf_TkUw(!L&75Aw|$pK4%11v1Nl5&>jJaOM@cxZ zZ(QJ&`R4N-dI{(L=Kn@Kr_!&E=Ujz{-A z(XN-D8$3d%$t&OVm9UHFi_o2I-J&F%%eR6T|67;m^uWn)+z)SLRDMH~9d=vTZ+!ml zf?U+_e@f{j+=G0chc?eH*)vMQxn3W5=a-xute5Z%G**OBc_@TJ!K^8NhiSUAXFTwOC0%E}!EfrIfRb92drKgxyAz zb8uS^yKKJ&IM2h4_AXMs)0t-Z;drTu{GBhCKWK(@+Dq?0*k%p2z2|eq1p| zY9B72+rMn9VVfe_AM)J(2YZcPA-8`Pa9#(r@4YlOT8a-lz?z4erM}EHAKZ)SiZ&2me%C`J`wSPR|H|YM>QMB+I!ZEru=-hf8xIr_Wpj>@)xa9#7L<8qa3vVqCPLAd^%rr;(W{w`4pst z(|rJ5={Lo-HC3!1jTc4wtlpfmQAAb_!g*c|K<-pgpHIHOGK75oKFJq_b}cdp@vuJG zs`FRP_rflskRAE(aJ^9)GkE-c5}PDPb|gx_X`dx$iqM~*U+4F7H27$SayL!nL4LB; z6nyrpM=H;viHb{&6*&8X$L$i;Lo>8W`_V!DQeAH*$}x5snxn3l>{Zt*%F%1mx&EcX zKU}XBzgbV>)4rJ<`9ePL{tW&e2=6z2a(~-mS(f18c{Y5<#EX>UNjvz}`5bSecFaHEWoHOI?aPGU zOm9za&+#Yo{opY_1^ka|xZ6fE5ouT-@ZCs#;NO1v=6=4vlf}aQ1b8OW_j(_l$lIob z8aBQNrW zd|n*IPZfUU`&Vk!sOaSTSD=OxN6P*59{9hGSnr>h;W!s%6AZ;G49Bq8==mwpHyMXgLbl>eZt@*weifgsMyx>o)UBna} z-t}SYBl|h~%MZS8U%KzvQ^2I5t7f^n>sR$FU8+Wj@7m zBJ$zq-1{k0j3OQ?+|{qX+;r+;;JM$U;rBGmD1G~1t(nkpJLSp;iwgPH%kS^F*mKfv zz;nMxW5jzHqTVU))*_yjcFL7^;rn5Wx@XSsQNHy;mgj!M?{U~%X37AqjZhKS@hgSh z2}m5ka-)pSMy$Mp;xrTX=O9gl++F9w%25UMvsCcXk$S*CxNq)Sy*aOJ`j5)z ze#6%%)4`uz+&9O7`H-dLeq)Rk{W%MK+pdX6qm_YCZa?ZbX{vq`|D&*<%A|f{R`r{$ zw?9}b_nTz!`TTUjU%dus6NN_9Z#=-cU%fVGS`D3q`+#%5F~0o0BjWluaPD^pQw$$S z*S`%}z`0!;RcJ8Hfbyx|soT@IO4v8JOylRH?d&;`5?|e(7Vul2@Ae=D{hg(VuWrvo z@PoJGO~(J|*W8{S@CS})`gd$Rmz<{$kAvKv>ELhu?Rxt{s`jLQ&Fv|-bNKoo{FDWG z?$`0Fg+F9I^=m8gNfV_Vby=T?{&>oe)0nt(ZLc=CH1B`m{XFV-F7SE3aCCg3swcN* zc4T=k@G6v{9EBTXt_>7>^nm^+c|Y)Et*B@0$xr*&I&%6r<3Zr*z`yt|sqU|jf9?ld zmkqpRCll!gZM?yCGpX~EOp6#pizgEM$mwMWPaX)aj zZ`$FElhM=v4Mz}_9|X?!mH2hk^qiVAAF_NlaJKL5M@`l5O;pbzt1kYBp7LovSp zh03NwvCqK!gW2DS_Mcg!%K^PN4-Z1#Hc8;ywz``cfKz?m)gs@C`)jkoKYXR@<7l@i zhyRB4Q}IoH;hz_JjHwahVx~yL_N(|d@E`5J_PqMOGUBH}57x&8{*ZkoQ`FxjCB9q5 zPXoW_pZfBJZ29#`#C0bwKM4N&^Ix77XU)$~M|)}32|JU^hBK@x=aW~}IzDkb67u(Lu3|~$o z`841>-Z@4TpO=#IUhegy0C2Xi;e#%}TBA+h^an ztof+ESLjkd>8~>b|CBP6!&BBi_Ud=8ar8gwm#DIDS-s$>wY#@nV%!ONwr_6M+;4up zbdJ}lS~qaE?_TLYx3w~z=Dn&xUZ>e4?4Ls!%29Ylm(Z{kces5GeBIx(PQ+>3o6dN>o0ua0ZII`6 z*U!P|+6H$RruiUWe{zEVM%&b?(P1kEm;NgD8n{2X!K<*U)clwf!6Dp_d|pQ`{;hI~ zF%Q?-(B5-VY@czlb^1&^a|7k)w&&----^oFvBkXq5aaBR1;DTGe%;vR%5NL#C)s2D zN%)J$Q+G)CCDWN|iE%;*3Gq!Tz5~DYyIL1DI`Z?gVP9_f;9vYFbQ;MeU+QDo;KCc)`2$t|pc57nbW+&p&?f>)bpv&J^wi%ogpZ zo_|8%Z)nkbL-F`LF8xRPsOKM3y70%o`xm>FFh=reUCr~4R)T0Y(A*l)$rDsqGwD7_%^H$_&c2SGMm3Hmo3VR(im%r zxMeIWvOc}*bIeOv$88-na|)Y8?U=Ax_<`$L_@H6#J|^Lb!2Njs$-KVK=BV(jAo_U< zaQ@!xoCQ^<>LolCIDb!8-+jj*K98k#$yh7&V|&xV|Ks8dCDi+c)Glg!$rfstc-8|c zw~KL$u#f#id}zqVY`}rij$p5CFMZEC7(CTKlbK8gX<~>+Wc@KB+*reg2 zmPozhw+el>m5rKxz3|8eLXW)f%y2y=vX+)o$`2o;hZAyaSJh_6@3B3E^LJ!eev&IQ z;(J1F$fqGK6;*K^`Scy}3N% ztK-tNP59~l6Zfe&CL*PNrjAR3sGns*FB{}j@I6@Xf2EQiFg~Iwjk|X#CDwHSaDnK zyTpl4eo*T}`Q(Qz=w(Ma$w*U>vQES&KX{Q(zex}OhvK}2-{Zgeos3d)f8gtZLCD=4 zxpgV`ZIaJMK3~6i)YGh7BoGJrF-0}5n05%ei9vR$ampt-D|mc8&>_hwcIc9&-!$H- zuRCyjpGX}rPxb+oALgsBJEWq#$8}z@a61r}4$>!8Wk*J2{n6_B?YKU2a@4ax_-i_{d1s)9rE0EDflhh9&Uf+lf2S?TGu`i$Go0z zHn@v+&KvK~1g;B$Uz{?OBdgP-pPPT!qdomk?Qbb2^mgF7a{s=UBEH*Y+KD*F{z9^ts zouh`HErxu*bmr0UN|)L(1$;hlThhGO@T(K2=AKuk0_S%AvR%y*Q8%{? zgx$Jy;5-IjzOi7#$p_}4gj4)w0+-`Sxj#?O`7IO1&ES5cr=b13-2D^qZQy^^|5!=&ejdd`?sF~RxscAt_;PhY?;*%RJmkQ> zH1OGOwjH$9tpz9U#LGjG(F1IURS;Y2bae_|EIm67HNM^yl?&?ADfhq9mNxw;{-HEPF(`$gK$4|zr9-cEea{c>m?YUn^+46AnZ^Az|q-UykzRJ%ZQ~4U?JCR=f^nq8_KLEYl!2ezD zdp^b~%BS%`{TyH#c$13uoKnF4NsRhAzySCoz8(F$djEvVSKrr_4gQ%8TVE-Jb-2(* ztV7iLm@|a^>;Ar4JI>6^JpI-BIKc1kI$XJM{`Gb~eca%eZ~AB5B9X-_@vGcV_Ocis zw7~q}(@*k$@Up-;e)<;kEtCDP*(da8|3`QD_YnJEk=JV)N0x6Hd?)-Z4KCjXdG0^M z{_*@H_a7&4?mwTsb?0ZDlca@yZs6R1eyKKZS(KAdfu{lI`2NTAy;hFj0B|1Xrfu5w zTSWf>&f}cv;*$EZ{bsIzzwkrX`Sn*Co#E=k{_~9!{fqn0CnrAe$@SYH=S190w}oQl z@}0oh|0O@IyHWD5AuCJxm;LwcfjLEG|HKa!{g3Ty+pnA_O6s2))EhuObu(}DmF-W( zxWfCmb*{e_rFG}or})nl<5r;?oT|ZvQba4f;W6%fr)vbNi1B6`dL-;ZEQIq~&V{N*dfkp89v@OyS=U z{1XCiLPD24>iuV$_tfKo=78`|uR_bta=VGr5uYg63f_QLr5_a(KRmvkGUp7C$5%Jx zY-q=%L05i~$4@iHNA};Bb7oDF<0Alhj_>6CD~m-rg@$4OLOulEvLS}|2-8}MwT&ctOIa{FbVfAW18&AJ=xS_A<3*LFzw zjpKLcAGO-+Y!x*Tw^OD;SS_;yhm@@U@0o$Zj2W$ z@FvXoAg7pwn}K_Q|M~mDEhgXvwTB4K2GqrX=~l2=dtC3%2(^-1%K=xn%BY? zX(a(VPf)Li2&Q#X2uTdsVIPsGzD(>paeQp9w6mKW zABo^6La)a=TAt$eFDR~4z&}-KZv}m>CgLB8YqdT?k0?z7{*khMKH$l~5BA-e zD%}TU@F1VZgZAYHR^3Z%`wYet!VmBCTeg?q-xscbKxEt)YuJB~_2>6<+adq{n_Ggi{;VJCpEc;}cBy?0 z9>}qNp7DS0kjqa7?n7F=kl`cQehcz5knZdLPO~`phx$L?A8kTAWP#T@y-sI(ub`F! z0SEDU{Pdz97&C=mrfw{?y@(}0UxWL%*uDht57pj#xTvxNtS&#fukfb{ zbYGjyr}4;MTg*dzUt22pq%yUSW1uL{2)pVP{%NM%ep%qNf3{wJ4x6sx{N(py`Qs&89WSZi-?Odj zX;Q@tjpH0I>Nv{aIDmW(QffDvFHEO|ouVC;>u88OE{FHK2~W@%G&b-9Q6fH>r%s8_ zhf+_pGol`8y_F%#IaGA$GA<)L{(#Tz9e4W0#X7Snk?;)Q+}`j0cClwv9Rxvt%Jmp@kHZKI^uwzn~Fap$BDAfxGhrO@rgeMwMsd3Q2Qi<&;F}jH0eY6xhNy*=kwf@ z6|>sN&xiQ9KD5uSQsYkR67$N>0M6|{XWbqfKOds_Gxz;$?4K;~Uu$3IBN`Vt)>vN; zaN}8F=MQf$Ss~3wdTSqHFUQkS|2LQAcw&87pEFPQeJAUif^r$3WUbIz)|cli);AUW zoyBgCElA%);OVUI*~*_v`Wmtr$9c_}9;_z!1~tr_EBrbvm;_Z#qd>jA&g zU*+C0+9LU+uMv8rgLlZ0m@2RD643rxz(0EW^&9f~z<6HR%j4JmwwwRr^+DKQz}at$ z_ujrF&zI`)%?`f)?&c~qU&;sB$L~wz_)Z4@^vmut1>+A4JnX%E75Y{L~B`JYqmK{IA4O?zoT)`Svw`YgS=ev+yTcsGL}EImHyB!8pT3 zg;{cWew6p__AhEQ?!Esm5h!joKZ<_G>rDNNeXeV5VR3=~E$rlR;^@m~Uermr5A(Gd zyh}0VIz>si4f!_IGos0mD|!hxV_fBVZQb?>2X*N0q@P<=|ExV%kMi{$rJv-ElR>rgU`J(XOh3%(* zDPSCn387th+;e~*tb1n{jbloi=N_bw7knP~+~7}rNn1Ns8Nbzh^|-#M*SY9Vue zzIt2@fj_TT<4Uw&q%L1Qj+ib9d;hf!zh1b2byALMon!-_j8xiN&*KcQ8wOeozsc(c zFZkRJCgaso+7#g;IiC4?!T$cSUud0qco6a&Z`R)PBCaR;foCI~JH6JiD5-qYWnrHg z?VI%R!0UPmw*u#RV$VQtF@uCVfb%@D`E0wlqa{3jwCIm6@Ycl)>&nk}(7eF&D#xQ2 zyscY?#2J%?o&1;hJnwKk`oZ7v`ujU$6PYPe;;Z8^1pdl_|NKMqp{o6()$wS`68=dF zOsPZPEl~5-@n{2o-pIAS!j}Aebv(Mj|Mc3V(M96(^VRW~2EM)X)t`#0;*sVBj>kwn z^%@u2KL~lA*ECmzeKMcswRq%{Cn*lIao>rpjo_Cs&iz3LcM~3HEAlxG?k_#NLcWhM z1?4%Li+K2U-Gz3%KT7hvpOgyTid{=`?;|9ftsu*%LoO5PlPd8u3`+l| zgW`bCznwV0$^q}x@GliG@(9~oLg*QPRn+&mQv8+}(5SpD*um?W>`sC=cg>C?JQs4Q zRGuB>By+mlb3kdn@S)(j&ry$AKT(MSjpmy+G4r1d?68>rS8#1Qj=INz-KQ6p0hyEvf;;#w)*&hC0eZLp)?UQ4J z_+(Ei%1eM;=I4Ef@*Ga~aD6>UKsikBeSF}2pU^b=U&eb=hI0JfZPshX4rR~N|D=x( zlQ*i%^7rY$UxBBedFN_87`Mvkq@Jj%4TRI-B zA8VFN7w4gTUcuMNvcZ4vcAvU@eTk(=AATMz72kh1-w^&8`Q`iGIMw(|alzkx;C&MZ z_*5pfSA1qizq?0@d>$KuJkQtJX9Cms zJeK4Gtj|qh$CR8A|3vH?p!`(4-=szA2fxbK6>N~>alY8l#L4n`rx~~t>9V^EM(}y3 z;?HPx`?|sF^wJmW)ZYanzPf$W!2kSr|4^D=<%9U@_6>qR?nd8sG{4FR@zw3C$rgS| zGfymC(EQ5n%l)3pqw_{L{Az_f&#zAWmiaWlrXZi>sa=9!h`8YUPO=AXTf;I6u21M9 zaL!vWHm4cM(n0d+C@&M~m~PjH@_0jd4)Xc^I3un!tj0PLZo&2A_*=sMzdoEdnXgL{ zo`8IQj^x?QCvWjQM{(~{jfaWglYTVbsd1sV^85*S{2WQDBuC?&U;0gYIKIGovZP4Q z*Pi^1!A7MCKd>Dk$ZfOt)$zDQ@|u5zeQd}1sJ4S*Y+-SlcVg7E6553L1aR z`$W5BV_jhbzh#B@&KETP_`zeo3;frvooi6g_+tZ~-+PwE`Wv?P=lMuzPxeP?GF0sl z1fMt*?`r$l?{7M8?&0?2@`$gt&wN|>Z}65G71iq|;;Zd*fZwIl!}h#>lFL`y=LSEN z)>QqOi*OvN?W3~DZVlx8ERU3MilZFqH^o5!?=$1?c{O@_!ZV&XDGoH%MSR(i@;v0* zwd0oVKjtCJ9pN84(oWyiYN0oi7I_Di&*K!oS1kqnrUz{gdELqq#OHC!0lj_TcbJ;+ zN^}A9kQMtwJP&1pPi2z*&VNPRvi-G-&RHeTLzcV34xWeFe0S`;JP(Cb@>|Y-VwUHj zWXSV8^hWiRzvX$z4%~yZa_nE@<#~wrZ_M!jv={db)7pebNdGLJ2O;n6khovgKMVOh zPj!0|_k*mz54iE3u(Qc?i;{SMoZ?vB{ub~?e^kiH&rJwzM8D#BD!2W?j~V-WwSu0X z$k+bhzj@L8tf1#7^0hzsLpQZ-NzYGcSs5jz@s`_P&Zl|G2)i>O&vStBzVL(0r+LbZ zd@7#&&hIPt%@Oglf6C^+<#{ISu2}b)FN^-O_0lKLbD1Qcf#;pwD0fKf&o;{PDUBlK zdky?%xh$Usxd76HKlXNK8>oCQ?ptx7oy5`n`2oC#=jsnNT5;2mer}Y{&p&?D+%QbG&j~yY>7zmkzsmaA zkRL!=c=M4uJZ@9@=BAPUd-dHZ59RVhkkdR6dLFB~wH%M*VR_^;o>JwHfjn*#9)jO( z;B|er?}ie7;e&7|^0N%0{F~)FEs@R(4Q>^leD7gV`Mk@C^3%Wz+{^OtJV)bv8pbuY zDF7ZRK=mii7xr^}KAYrz!tF!-LM<=kl=}s_oQFbhGg887{z#C1lODF{$n_XMUrl_v zPM!>YjvROX1 zG2C8wo+umT_PJ$hF7L}&9!1J;npOF_EYJPX`bhZYN0)u7ET4nt%N@Xf8Q!u#KmSSf zXQ;}re>^xrF5d+?FH*mMK^D({B+t()`GGGCJ)Fe%GZOB37^#18XO$?qeAYi3@(12% zH>@E2O^=0rjhC9gT$?7WU4|L}S^8~B$^T8)zJGpgce>7DUYW&fF; z2)|g7X4!+U$o6|tt^;_+yk47JtoTH3XY!N!{gk|3 zt=gkk&Hq}jW}@62q=(wfo$_DnRX#tpJQIGY)}_;ZjtBM&>BH+4em`X*_|>x>*C=Sc zYC*g4desBI@TX26!uZG6QC_w={*)~lbh9~JI zJOOwr(s#ZoU%R07FrUA_@!KoSv^L>!DxcTGnUIfjUuY-WmxFwsC*G}DW3_BwI`DX{ z@Wby1&m54~!|M1-0Pk6$ZYlq@9_IK;1pkZ4zsLR8dYI$O1OA*BMm+tm^)Sa*I`~aK zI+0q?dYI!&o_A?IoQ}B2f;{)}c%ATr%%}CR75RuuL+bBhy}{pAPpGzhIrmGYU2?B~ zCl(QLIqgu}g=0?@4YwS%8^;^J-($}wL8}&VLH)>!`us?_UzhDSu|LP3hyt;{$>$+1 z@PkN8U;2B+fA#B}=|VqEl(756;3rT1t6$r2pM@3twWBtERZzdStNOJQeD+`b!ASpI zyV0eg9JhY(*-vkzEj=v9ZHh|1Xz}~q_q!l)lU~?;xM<(lg8Ch| zkI^~lX+izY0r}pU|J;)GcOjqq-JfGWYbon*1@1+UZ4!azCPe=Y`*$kmr8q#c!EU z{mzGcj++GB*B0MR%tH-Nlv&E_eCk*Hybb%kwdU$=d0mr*@{G~K-lpp^?o0jF;2I># z_2BwLr=^8nmFMHs5+ZK7{I#>U+vW0;QLfD@c#A4%>d5P^-15PzQmtCVx{9A8d7f{UJpA7_9uH)B zJLIp=diHri^87yazL!3(Q;@s|@;}T?87a&Aknc|x?NGmjaiqL%P6nQV)Y)d{0eRhN zL4Fp}JqzF6BCk7r@Q=|b?C*cWZQyk$*=GlC0siBymk09mMTA>`+kyA?fVAEAeGUohn2V};-BNC~HPtyB6CYAL8R8{b0*3XUOwI-g$Te zcptU-xiRk>DfRrH??vpG#9D^+%v}$qpqwT5+q4-!_gWveGY$Ftotv^RxNC9=WJdrv z-xn}x)$j6q-3%edG476=ynBgkr>1bEoew7bnO%^bX7Hj0&sV-%Cl0FLjQd~M&&EBa zYRP`){QxKAFYRA`Lhh$Frhq3ea_UF7{ar$)##ex%~UQZjCXoCWoCTvM}k#Qq&{ zzF%W-w=qZfJe~aKDH5sQy%lpC$@-d{p zrl_!+^BBp}!4&KUeM261n}HkZ1kAc)0JOT)!K*8}j82 zKmJp$KTTEtvXq)ha{ZbpQNJ1T7vA5{M~=^sO8!itw)JHFG{uDdyf5`v``MeH~ztk&+Ixz){o=M4gB!H#Jkqa@9#&sw+9XRW|ZOQSI}RzUgRg26zy8}rGsOy)ZB3& zxZV$($Cwq@ZSRQDNR0b7;6bFO)`eWMKSJoikr;(3wRG(>jvhXX66TkF-Nq&u6^8 z<9Hyx`o6><_@~~D`H<~qKIv~UiFVhN6n^MYrL$5Axq!3(D;wIK=l(?XbNg}q=XTDiCfDzWJh%VSbA8Io^#_5o9fn~)yf4?E4czsX z(C>$+uNuqo>t+2)3HvuUd9$A!zgFaDIfZ=70YhdLg#$@{EBxyK@6@_;BZ^6Q5b@^% zzWd>Kxu3ltc`x$0|Lxd%aXr7wlW-U0{ou86T72P;Jt%b$ZbSbI0xxP><|!%FpN)Kf z1EK%UN(a-z4_`n&g!$C;oUnhxKlY2~Qg}XNKE+p>Y8{;e zK5?i$_&QMn?0ReecP+TR>3mvkk3C-auh-_-s|GXIBvRt5?MVjzs%=dd-uGZB;;ZdR z1^;W`oOV3EF`xR8+8)BlP7CBRkmevIocfWetk9c&Q#z`I@dEh3p zawvYvJ)d(_5pi!nshRcWFP{W}=YH4EiTmaM_tx8Ht(nkBc?-^O8%=&%HTkbi3xMbD zkMn*1zLkwOa=#{h{m?&%l=sK)u6(sZLHpw_@VrQ~k+iuyV?ug8X4FC;T<0 zV&U_=-zM|*I>4`eXUZyr;y*2um6X~ifH>sqUT*M-rubKH>nHrm*S(hZEmcH= zcAz*7G9TmL+0zZy%GbTJf%CYx)#BCZe|Rjm;o>US-t=keG+zMq)q%l*ww4S78pmWNz2(w2Y3 zyZQa9g!`bE2Y8Kj^>)XheCl`V_t5#k>t#s)s<2t;!GDRbel8&c{0);zk1S$hrbvme z-k;3@|C6;liu3x8rNZkG)qG*8DEvnpvWMSG&i3qW+~=-jPrmo+r9eJz)}I#&uqWSp z+)}~+U;BS<6kt!j{oM@konzMyQ``=Zl0=XQdmP&bc(tKf)ek*qCa@-=$ zdCjZ;?qV-niT2r49{Je?KJVA@ymD#J$_jEH;`%jpMO-uHjjS*CJ2YI*v|r*IFqhgP z1U`RGoP1` zEp(8d)%H+6jV}S{>4ZFwFJAm+n}|>2ix2tqJ8UQ4*VRh+-?pMf$rv}G0ynirzEAkG z==nd6N4djrSl(C}?TUG$aha`Ny@d1rkOjQCy+a2K67EI$KCIKSXB?Ox<^MsID5E3bSzmk+%2lZif~I}gu7d)R@$Sx!?V7C6Pd`ab() z@Z2A@o?8g@h|)wqQQv3p0sq)ncP_*^nJH2#Uwxl_I`|))ZSsC$_<^Ou`ecYWa3jqE ze}36x+l$zknODAA|M)7xPve`^GZwYx=d1O%ga1y2)_sbZ^YhjEr+`1B^NF1%Q+~cp zrN0mS1=}_C`FxqBXuLM7#*s|$i9_+p@5#P&ULx}SY8zNa{C@Uy)~8FSCQBI zD@Be|ovI9cH?Mvr{vprL@5lZ$^E0hmFsObHaDMK)X0;=~=p@_+ocmYJk^!6Ce=~q{ z|43S~tczZf&jQZ((QnvpJ0|yE<4eLmUSF*JqU54zN!|jS`)~K*OaGPqV+YRtujJ(s zUb%nRQGYUc%Hx&w3Q6Vjd$uj;XFZoMd?M@T;){x?Uw*G?B8rW|C?A?tdBnWy5CN1TAsWe^89_;_7^Wc z)Jb@ z_~^bo=ZX&FLfHOl!hVjArAL~Nijr^(aE^~VwV$kv7=KZ|9X!3Y)4k|4Q9q40yle>!-Zx<4ylP<&ZY|7W#ZPB*wj z31Ry!!hR#-t9>K$S$X_-Ag&Z|F& z@;%^fsJozLME^s+4{7tv-+zmU|12^7@N;CPPtLC>$9ERwIKIq1+LViu?6<>ztp9!6 zu}5EFl$>3jF^t-8`_RE6Zso=G^-rzU6{dj!$;`z&Uo%frfg!vk3-z>=S_&4Z5(XI0M z#p64V-y_$&wNi_?3y&|ggnxK`7`&^}S)GL2fph=*eZjYmC<#vn&h67~+!4QC!g+l6 zfcL)l^e+YpXL*jF@1AK+%JM$QWgt!2J#9iXtsOYbt4GPv{NEdg?gNRvkNh?3hY1^H}Gt4#-*$>Vhf+A9^j zlMRQQj+4qyM?UvA--W{43rlzg;w2NjgG(Dbi%7T;cn_Kc6zIr}S1pn@h_>bak1@Kkz>H%Lr_Lp{Lt@-(C{nNp({%r80a_0Pe_56_q{_UNNvwL#5ClPL}E9~O;1!cYva-R8k zWH_`HTxS7(5r$59v2Np<(KljPKi+R;`>sA$_rnVHYdm2*8S-r3koPj5e0gbM_|h=d z?*Y#C?OQu`O5KzxUD-Y#aJKK#*f%EhubcFFN;A~&n>l?ng zuyk?wiUHYYtS9Wh4ExHSZ@2hyVCpHB=ly54Z`r>c-rG2LQenpJkZ1emK0P+0)QrV^ z-;OpJINNux)vrIqmi2xJd7TG1+t>Q#%h$D4`{%yT$p@V6J03Xn=iKzyt8)Drz}dc) zqo-G%-mPgvE7{{ zKQwdsKH%K%y6)S5V*QpN`_I7l$MgEGMbRcxv<{LE_di1xVqbS!!;qnVC}g zh#%G`zM=5fw1u;?3%dSpM?5j#4*se|TL%|({oPbg#1FztlL9_zpu~s4;S%?&@OOjG zZJ)SB?-cqG&d*^iN0@t zZGMPx7jPcuM*n`TZgj@_&$)ar@J^JW9M_Uki!SO@&rAPP{fxgw8Orf_-zI-AZ#hy+ z{}b**zwSX9%F$@MsaBzR&j!-}3U1*08m;Sup9(GPyIyZ2RLEQWk@i*V@|`*D)#+1# zYpsnU?K{w-SVFJ%$A4tp0i5kidF5E6(O>udfXjCQXZ>1y>^*a1?M$ABa=*9A{dnw# zs{?dSk{0^=A$OKa0}D zIGoMx#r(#?{@q2lejk&+-^K*N=W*2rzP@+$7DgMFEK<_P4?d5RF7Rh9eEloFzRps_ zx2nod1K+FNl2gdc%)IhVs`7*2zglR*Jbr$OrKtRD^e5Iw(?r-i@AwRNc(KD|C8hr9 zRE^tK@QJ3xo8Ht+#1p^&q;&t^c5o3Ck8bd}9U7k-_EZZ3;c38mU!}{4H~c!6AP^n^ z&ig7&A8b1rCE+39ye>GJb*qtH!Zl5WeO!K_A;&u#B-{*~*A2>Z)hnYV+yjd}9A)GDGM^183&D-X(-pI7lyvQV*4n+ACvPckaL>8Sp{LL(Uu z0O$U8;Jjf`!bkVHKk7ojU&YOZh1-67I_bc?w;^xvj}-N@{RbUYj!OR1nKwr2_s1@6 zsh%CqzQ*<2nnjKW>yP|?DEs*jzG2)6ob@}qp!_diUo7((aGe`?UFf&Kxo%^hT`T`# z`J6aWKd-w>E?={$NVTsTGai6Eue(nej=EwzyUQ{j0?zC1^vz{<44JjQ8rQF}3H{ms zHJerF_Ge4?8kRQ$Xa5I1KmOIMU)`aM+kmruM_0FMzNW=J1DEdvULW?|oWJ9h*mg%x z12@<|72_4h=gziem$Cnq{uu3sd>T@-PWWT)iiF7=$5a*_#7~30mQ8{efL!g~pRVAz z7Hq-SfNw^c4gS6{4F++XGe6v45l`mk!f(f>H$M@Jc&7T*;XEiIn)+ z7@tfSUtQq4A3vWM=g7|ws>eU@(@g6R7PjT*`_>H zqUQX3ld60x_!nyZ)TWpzKVLn*I>Ep4T6y(tJmLKa_4rC9hR0ouYhK6)kP=SoqD<+x z(r&u+B_bZe9Yf&^J349d@l9RE5TC{wV@qKt_oGs~YOk_&STTxm3vlj7KaXnB>!qn9 z!ycsa?Z6FFdxV!xKLz$Z`Cs4ex$A~x;M|YqzHqnN^K;jY=kh(kxgY(oxT^Bpe4RfZ zbY?0w?=ZYF&m&lZ_^#H%-}Y9bT)q#r;l$LneBYkTPlvwo;HMz%PWa6 ze=)D~_r2y_trf@jp(^@Cdp;33w@21t@w@2iq+>c8m6CTT;}+6DgW%-6Ez_bRB{%h*QP`|RoBmkWBY zg1Wsd;Qu=P((r=btDuh0MDV>oo~`s>?^WRT@_@gqb?4pmUIqD}^CxaEtpw1%Wdi#R z^1OeNh2Jut_F*+|$n6}ZiLWo(jd=;v#C=#)4b`j0DWB@KaXHNdpX+rZpUWeDc>kCA z%5RFVWL3Ro)=Y}nm-cTJdZj~d=TXNo-p{3Y$lb4*BzQA@1ME8V3&L|CmyYKkW-d6^ zEe1HnuTk~9LA+h~rR0oyFR0v4`WpEArwQQAjeYP*EE%U9VI1`(1MlCkWRXGwR&eD# z(JFgA;N{BWd!v5-j-|t$``&XZKLdRB$DKth*0VpToz&%va+ULI$YmilzM0qlG>@32 z-&*B)$MC{N5#|)j8cmClBZt8pvN!KJ0LVYA^=oGO?%&qK9(@Y(l`_Le@%St34l$mu z74637A*tXGn^~+T%Rp4APkBB_<-c^5-ryhjKAj)|<>e(ls#r|L+JN~PjWK}sikdJRC{E_ol#)*s1 z`h*|(B7fMB@4YA5E9t_F;Zz45WUmuAx1+ztS1$G);cgZFVb7mha@-Q0ro!9T8&QMD z60(E)7^mDf2agytR`v<>$@NPJ<*pk#w9)=cKRg1iH?j)>?L;A!KQ8_r}peB73*LLhTR^aqku`gF27s`F~aNQjJ#D(E!dKFxshJ3E$uw`W# zE`j{xV11GHJ~ySY?7sl)3;}QaMTsxD&ysw?m!jSH{qZ-4$49)sHCu)Ea^Anex{$oN zgYcIP>B*bXe{=f~u0g&N>GBWjwdb*ea5wV#{CIcmd-df0;79zWftPfz_$>LoE)L)U z;MMosiiwr_Q$m91&)lDE+Fn}jPhtH!3jMkKS*t()UM@d`a?RkSZ+bhK_q%DH$WV<_ zHt>2@tMWR>0Jj&7!|HL0Fq$v3FkU&i97cWgWH5tIoy9Zu3hYjxko+wE1TW;K1I|=_yoZn*lm{Q*@ z=W@6|a?0iPA2)h*(ulFph}e;OrJ%femY(Cz4f)^qgp*!e4yRmRQc6<)abuJI&+;-* zUf-ncYm!D@2=6;kc_pb}<=~W`p;f+hs~FmEtny967UKpCN|H5|?T&W{yFVFG{Np#) z4J}7yQMsk)ALZbb%O9OIYTV$_Ndr2$l17J1ACsrDT&@e{esFYW)~zG=TvQgtY4Eg& zhqTHfp1*y0eOqmSP=RMaE^Dday`(#TP8SHnVfifJeE(|OfiM3YCE>=-!XCc=sqoKJ z8|fw70-W!EI_rM_jzPlhzP$-oo}7$6_Sh!}XsL`p0&jv(YHw ze1DWCMU->w^@f*qK~4A||757@|911>@lg_Poh#&6e*IVfjM7WEv5T;u_3ygyR3n3g zC*nQSEZ?%}PjPbjc9r~>t=5OQ{CFiYxV3L>JC>=jDUqTabRK7(2fskxgS1@3uSy!M zf)^%(p8-3(bH%<<8u&$@Z(bqVoS$z3-vV9`Y4)pIqGC+>`EIY!$N7aQU-Opm%gH5) zCyk07@ct$Jz~(VzXtous0sx(`5af;BOe$a$})Tem;K>%nP3DE1}o3 zpUVZ~3gGkiz zcNP9=RJzXOqW=8+9E?9s^j`<~?~E9Eu~=Guz7PCtd?(Tkev_4}CYikX`HA2MaKDrv z{E}}zdX4TklUt1JHG$9ihrqx6{qC|QT>1Ha=*|8ybrbeJ-Ryj=q%%L?3qF@`1Aq01 zzTHbX^7C!rvwvLRHyb&i{&Tkc{M`Gt;GZ<`YutL%QQDfHZ$|m-pCI@X{z^Dg#+;we z_vx_yn(o5hhX*z_i#O%xtG~x)1%K+yl^e<`la%a#I#1Cw5OK!O_d3DXCn~1peur%FF6B;e+hUhJAkU4)p6bD<;oBx%TlqwX12;4y{{~ha8XdGresN>LlEhDD3C! zNsda(|B8}uD{$VgualXvMlazG;C#Kvdi#7$gM_<)^FEfV{rHa25*}px!86b>y zK0osL`e)U?E&Z_)9t6(o>6Tr7v=@?aKm3;sUg?W-PsagQ#)sVRFYM8uubz8Ak zg|jpf2l3V8trh%@V;fH_k{Lm#@iSUI-a5fAcXz&{XhvjzA-;ON^@4xntu@7prRV3X z$J+q-pY1Qz*yPL4SC6;Z;1_jIFceSC&sUGP=3c@-e_M+6DdEY_SC6+2@K;uy{awkF z{CxFz>jwWb{jrs$lJoP`?<82!Fqc?ThU(OiGr}HfyZ?#e= z()pGb{U8W=Wn>mdA7P)&r}M3Nf{B}e)6J?2DJytr^nKAFNU5Vfmk?P~;DEq9C%RrhV=|TIQrgwzhtQWtpl=od{zEgP$+o0&J z_rDk!2M?Y*6}~5xiS%j5mAT)2B)i?nH}(lwD1eJQyO@qySrY} zo5OI}Z~hO39M1lc9h ziD8c>7ocCXTE7tZ4clf;Q|m`@q}EU9rMxc)aweznn++-96i12DZ^aIsrir)?QiKS~ zp0r214ap7-y{m0+k<#?FTtV|o7 znMxD>%!V9~3l;bOu!-X(JU$hmhoZmUR!PKxwV$xJf7Qdq<$CSN=XFngYy49Ay)((c zdEL`<_Sxk+Wxip(Jiu9ROOwmv`1&8kA-~7o1fCCRvrSp;^~yXXAH+8`z*s|mk?RyH zUmbrb;P2`APvf}!@fWR*KOgvwjERHP-=(K`;P{ir7g`5-(C(R#=XH=VN%%wN(>lnE zeDWOiGk(4%hn^%5Lj2SP3rDc5Tp_ zpP}-92z;WEJ?V);Prm+D^2_qGxd=H<|NrV!-iJ9z_|bv1>%$6}(I}AYb0eSayRxS3 zCSGR}&hNSB`r>EIN@iaZ9)P_0me9M;h1rw2{RvM49zyy~5C03iE{KrFcO?hCnN?Gk z*CY%5%}B4+aJHAPFLC{D$ltcV`B0X(LC%RZI5fw{*N^1-O-F_P4~8uGS(bN0E)D6* zodX;4eY*v=2YAV^uX?^PHyl#x2kQ1Gh~mP;euBJdu&|qOTF+Rd-_-BZN&kH0=2ieK{G2Y=~UjEWkdTWe342Q>&?4cr`#}5zcOW)FD0pBkx*karXs`x(e z8@y)uHrC0^yz>3v^LP0&!T0o@|92rre!drc-iI{~5&l^BwS8oqEk9rLI@aOXmrMY^ z--N+!3tRK^)#ts*;Kz4z-zZ|v&-Y`0Iu*Rs#UftJp0vsZ+?SZIeKH_d_F~+~0`5!9 zy+14we#rrUNy|rRCS@MxK1Z5Sykub<;eAZY(7bq2+FS4KBlP2a%C2?K^_SNZDd6*b zJs|1q=UU986fdd3d0aR-d*^zcgr@`N`P?^pMp6`T>KAH%WrF|1-(8OvRpwv$Aig@D zbHLxXy5^8#%KR%I#OL=4vcD|Dg#De*KHppIFY0&fFWHYY|0JTGM9A~}3V_l+`;~zH)qJm0_R`UYaK4^ z&oH$t!s8d!Ne9`lu9x!3eiP&pk>=Wu->fI`!}cRz$Sc=x<_dj1*F>5zPox)q4K$(k zrz}tQJ77P@ZAdDQ;x2isZzpN(|Ll{f5kKE(14x9FTub({V~c z{&B7o{<(d+@ffW+Tz!OpypXT3?2Jv;--UcXQqQ5bPT4=)e(ptLJl-33?caj*%ZB`W z&mMnRkbXHI3HgydkIpDaKdVdlXV&>(30XfA@*PN@c#r-n>&NYPve>k{fFma(D89pT+?n@+opCF8TeV z{C%n97bf22G6?5=v@FOiD*C&T_YDa*juv+EeR;dKc2DCmkj9OGYTUGdPxX^sYFy|Q zrLlv@-~CCJYd;s_ zb|Js1?IB@`halwKkYkxN{AT@$Pw|kBeELoG^8LU3zTKGR!`kSv4kJ7Ve8!tBueH_y zoaR;ab0G0!glcDOZs31DT|X%r(^-(Pul~>&kp;Plu|V9pDp( z+K=D6$?exaIc1IPpEU5tmyWX+xWpXemq44mWR+LB(zC<(U#=k{-L=-prB_z0kWCwLv3oSqgV$@6>X z%<#MSP?=a+J`HkC;IqyiOp*N)0M7nv^>2fLl7DjFd&%+8vgE+4?5nW-?+N?4e=Mkd zrlM?r_7O4e@cj^f?K^l_>(qn~lD9#g?}s?}IJJmQ!i{xA|8RnLJoSHnL`k>>IQzfF zqnCctN&UwSxiqA08lTL4Z!pC#zgN+O8C(1E{ z*Y?n)Ap4E%;r+V!sUmKg4B47wL`?t1ig?_9LI|{b0`e zjz*i%FdUE2F9_a)^3PR?mGErjbAPtKckqou5*|W-GEEYG82=>d8{Y2;w-<0L@Oz^^ zsKC#i7UWL{cz>j(&MWA7Q*}JL!0)b&?_0pWPISKc0DSA8>%J~vUngI@2f;sB;l9-* z+?M+{ygpZr*96iy?&fiHvha%)Dd99P+oj*+C;l!Xx6`~v^R-%3sKmqn`F+Ub{#2qk zlyY*fbETsEBLiRj_{G8-9}3(@w3(SAC4KlhR|@Mj zRoGYa*1nGlTF3fr!moUPr4{^Z^FFIw&^p$qiZ3Vlqyfc6G*sf0&%s6y9+b=%Rwypw zaX+>n@+A%|3p}ZQeJ+VBxIPp4N}1u~`|n=;f0TW9e3RApf0`z3I)E?@J1hyvs4N3A zf-;J%$_yY{C z@|1V8{%!M24LsD3AIbUG37!vS?Pgzei$pt8o6IZa@5BYbU$Vlnj?Ndv7xr0!o2JP) zP1&@13!QI6IO=I!*1V}|7L_D52;2^w#zmpoeY2t&?gUQp+1>fIp*rAVo>h(;H~5h! zj%}d%p6nHT<+$;I|NVs?yJ8cFDNDgujvL*F($7n;?!FOc%*$7f8#DN6JvaW7-}{l2 z1l-sgzud8)HluJ%;!8;JZ>KBwb=zTZmJ9TX{) zvP1agFoyf(X6>7U-&XbGvoj`~M|RUZ!_*2tqI4fgzeT;sTlyXfjl01!hIdpOrIf&v zz^A+&SvYx7WG=3;C(HKfzDSMsk=OWrku+)#=cA~GFZYT_%+;R(oX$tj2e+%spQFhH zPWJV(wK>S2qoL<@Q;3Ih{*CX><@X#-+CFJ7&F}gdG9Js1sfUSuM~a`YQ1lz!MKdL;OFHap!Sg9WVNYB&&suJ;YNqsu z?Cn?Z_dmG3%KkKhf4Tmg+WFa=h4w7qMP~LL#q8Clpq}F2EV0K`{+tf|P7R$m&UH(= z5@`vAKh(b&kSDzIiQ3g^oh15~eusweE2Bolartb8{Evet@8+lt)S6m3ZxofwX?$`m>?GWr0VrTz?wmDE>v?|NJ!XzZBpZC?guytj^aR zBv1LZ@#{(dQW<++R=&5HzEILOaEzpow#Ryq{b-YC~!US zB$VejC6%CcjTry5u27-<6!0$E=WmKt^oQVE6z{=K1OMk9rfYF2;r%E0M(`=V9`Fwh z%q$n5oR^>Td_Vdl8+`54YR3yC<>f2igKhjo#-m!xR{IKC!ucW|X~?@I@a~l9Ikr&l z{H66^zDNZ=xzDSk^$br(J;i(GqQCnTX1E79<=wo_XCD^oEU)IZsGD_@0aEa{L>o$nx*Kk+aDJ z;Ws_6NcXAedbCpI6%BdY(5E%em2tG9Y_;Zj3?KIn)Kfq9Z`$+ANWE-P8bA348|NAKY(nKnOSb@5O46Yk8E*Z0jXo(sJ@OZ&s~me)&veh_#>2K3Q; zv_2bndcdsj3l1hc6F9v`>*ns*F{_`Cr1zJovw>5-T-D!bl(esHJs}^AQ?&k5=@<29 z>M3c@h{l08xNpQygFbpLI05pHObZrM{|c@+MBZ5&%6O5kWbh>(d|zbq@Vx7Pq)3;L za7bRQ_Tl#hDSkaxwLE5;-6I+D5t-0O?=frHuggnuLrR8jO$6f~kqw;QV^(C`xg8%x z|9S-SYJHmY|Ni^(J!UIZOTP77dO!5qF(ID-oZ>&r+qT08*QS-B_LG29{8v@f411hD z`aRO00z9NJSUIn5sePICOZ^~lk*8_EDV`Mnmp;|yymv!z#UaK;2K>o@+|tp#o>SZf zo`rgvKm9Sa_C*>);;LXDJZUKZRZ&S(;+vz!4D2+p?|^}0YBe7`aAf~UwVDqZQEQ+* zrSHfAT}KA1$BqmBH)Q1C<|79LpHLq=Zp`@p;-v{t7b-;l8|TY-ii+U(7GhHIdD35F zGl?tg^j?&CmIl1c{#Oc8jtD#%xC?muO&z<&8l?t-r=5}VUf>mGpDat)=>qqo-g;T` zzW4N57SH5Okk>7c_NH#F+LxZg6Y?h1Qyi;A4PHX~v!dUW?~_XezxY2Zt0?zng+3MR zv4L0X&nKt!ut)Su4e6SS%2)6?|9(jsGjQy{F%t%M?mK8;&Ko8mA+N{XXh&3ve$XwH zewKMYU>FgFUDOW-!W-XTmR~<40N*yFkt4r;NCLjK_`t%vA5u_H{ZPhp;k*3$Aq~8F zKervo`ym7M)DLa-3FZG+KV*Vm>yNLq^6LjD^(%N0HR_KoY?KiZ{i?_KqWRFcNXBi9 zKe~JooL?w@q4BGj4=vyq998XYdKU=s#d$_K9|}yIXVTDa3gjJGGH=uInfgTV#W-`L zUdrb_7fAa%^jzSYOK<$cWd&c%%jt@FIl%Ps-`k*l5;{+(-J4rGf}LmSc|>YAaj}e7 z6Hmb`nwLbI;t>8T+ZFY~e-q?VP}2D-9iO=mA^%Y?gH~#S!#7%Ej~uyJ$W7U%!vxQS^H@(-)i%G)aTP&&NxRV;_(iBH#c2+6&$Y+=1?uJVJVeg@HM+l&0RHyBy_Z9a4hmMV z6z!*>{bcY8bbFE+2Tlk_J&mt9xBI+H`^WjkI|KZAj~kZHZ{JwizoIEIzKpOV6Y?~^ zR7<75ly`zJ#+L#0;Uj)$fBG?E~CvS8AD-;iNwR-prmi=0q{v zO81wR%lz**^35`hLX{^73=`aS$Ij_(`s#hl?BY@|E%N zgTG+&i}(`yynJPR3|~lp+YVgVHRpwd5EJLSEX8>x5qv=r^9McmMe|3a%#Y9V`NIi5 z-7%_y&N}{Mc+->OMX{7*#=3mWN z{IzD_H2+nqc4}`tYu}CdTEQDr^vHV!815Y}=Qo<4PVG3fgSYR59OXyMpycPgeLBBT z|CZgcGKKe_kL2+_)oDaT7CS4UeME;u7Wqc^U z??g@1X*mx4R`Bk%uhTb*;dFkX{CL0AbWdceDs%|_PRLRGFTLLXn1XXVOg;=NmB|Ke@mw}>$2;&$kz{O?n^NGo+pF75Z75&Ccfx@(*!v_9N@)t>@${+FM4j&iSziUZ7Ou*>mwiJ z+&I6t=~j9KUmwu>A}M~ep0}99$B$u6cz#!%vHU{V_yJDwtLr*ZjE^5HaO(frLwnp0 zoBx2*{4w#+>rJCPG6KSX$J?@fCwT1|7uE6kEkOPO|D$EbuYCTX-vg%m(C!-Z6C)5{ zp+5jQn*X=-`1TjRKGk=Z?UVicCf1KqXXV;wUMq3R&tBz|9z-(S3Y_BmcvXZ(!*Dxr z%FpS6b~CjMcLJyQ9<2YUbri!XKi%MMQl0xZzx*^HKYif!E_kGNOg{OkTn_}O{TZ`1 zP+V0wMEnfEP3vSFz8%@PBIU8beN)5NuO+WNI-pCJ3ItB?BPIVI_FS}t=a&z{!7G>chif{STb{*JaIc=iC3_727#$Uw-{h^Sckc z88=#{=hy$r^6? zW&F%E-v2beB;!2yb6-=~d#|mKqxE66U*?SE*QZH}{JD4W@tZt9oRFvd*fzS$E}kE5 z;1r)3hhFWRUw-(&>p$=EmHhI9)&~Lby0<)#nO}Y=uSX0UWn6mbCsocbKkU$#2;Quf zS(SNyn5W77v7-OaCqL|_P0byjCiFk`@2Y(n>v{jWp_lqMqvfQ?{QB1iUc;JwXN2`H z>H{cuZF=h)-oGh|{+Soec{R?qnQ zi`IAap3n`0cJGM5c}2)uAy4b`wM%Pes~K(wPUqk4yDF}XWVjPJt-migtA3$jxEnZ) zucsxae5+-+4>+x_e;cvoN)*Fs{Tcu-yYv31(F`Yf%C84yKAXhl4Vz_r%qWjPxzSe# zd9mKhp!M(P@;cQD-dCpglPS*-?ohnVu)_}C>5ZkYQon}Ir}+Jk%u7<=oEz$}`(s|n z*)VQC`TNS2Xpd|`$h(01QC8LVd6nmb?knjJ`Mc$>+2iQ<1oZ-BfFyhfGlBotz}9plgeeEWo#qV)`Sp`ONDsS+i76lS;?^Nkn0&C3qI zUxeXS%;$dKzV9ZqDavr&7U@6Dx2qd;T3n3bW}FXA;5Co9_jhrITd`h91pZIO>jz6P z+=hBu4_F3NJn|C5eOQk=z$;heN@WAX-B|CsfM4CZ_*zMZdr?p8(G5kf-zmj#H?DL2 z;JsJ(>aV34ZU?U0D&z2Y_>#}c0M9R{#*8nUp$a<$UpZeTf`4;#)zanC!{{o( zSDs(&;K#4otuCLIm#B1|<)VzG<`ql^jnhIThu8@+Kue@H!Cy7%OtUHpdHKrtc)=fZbm*He z8}ss&@dwo5<0 zxOxA$+89!k^Cv&PPX)hYTaQvJ`XM5CA72A$DkJgP)~9Zc-k_a1-*ZYu``M%RG%7Wv zOz1I}(ERU^_S5?f##OnoIwDD`$j>e>^t@5$&7x{cPE(Af$R z$PX9zlXl*nEuI_ahsZNkBN;#XJv$%xf)|XhCb^Bo>G$l^kN)!W=cs93rSqf1-Frbq zvTP;jZ_e{@IeEEL#^;yB?{2BlPm(S3(gfUwa_-A-_M+#mMSnX{Pv@g451rjKc#d4) zl-HT~y}Ls3U29Wbhj7UIP_8ar=%AL#2T)JHm$!WH={iviH|&!3)9>X?7iko|aX5ao{_{4Rfb3W@h8@aH@kE%l)4ZCH$XnZH)Gv|x@sL7}o zN<=@I@q8scNBMZk$Vie2;u>8InU_@eaJp?T86f2C_J&IpP8G$FG{9#GS*ZBJfNj?p~7uu`hsI^=^ z6>{k)A9wOc(Q^p-#lr)h{>PY>%I6P69xLN7;~xAT8RC;g@_S@l1TN0QCiYqMJI%jN zJpW4X-FodKk2=5iZduUp^t~M`(Wq`FoFO zp7cR}f2;PINQ4{Rx^B1?@4BqxTzs5yj zo)S2{SIY*xP>r7>>Agz=r|SZGf6H$(K5s?en-KA~#f7hXT+lQ9(SpiaOUTWfKZ39H z*9-o*#9xa>CFD>;{|LU)-vIdMdi+(Ho}VEp?yqT|jLVcs19sByo(kLnc`NWy&UePd zuy}Y8e>?Cdoo+X$c|B-Pp7&5W!E3hn%1i%iKBs(igMWX?qh0yE50~?N%e9-TRw6ElQ@#*>Ba(mi*Rb=Bo9|BjWfZttI1dsTuV-8%H z|K%<5e^6dc&wpRi1{#aDGG~r{RIkL8G~f{#kf-O5TQ}XEX+AyvRl+lYQ~QOcHJSEK z>A9Z*S7!q!zYbh%aWro0>BRyUd7%GB`bp0}(euau=kwptXT^Ce0rHRk?c0y$F`-)= zV*d9i=YQ}8F5+o^Q=ad{XYrhB2JoK}9<~;B;t=^oKVx2c_#EaD{&fjb|_@!|vC zp;NiReBL($4*;LK>U!^JDIStH9FTEHdnom^+1X_eEenKxk~f2Q&$BKehRM4hNx9_7 z(w{e?N;IT+1nqoM2wW-);YSQ7`?IrS&&j4?Ir|#>;@0f{0$Y-LS@@VbzYqt!>5FEm({cP~2 zTYicu30&lntz~!~B^;Jx?*{MRjg^L%1s?Q6RY8?|i1SDQyuB@Zr4u6TaQS3D z=#EG~4_Y6-#^*irg>bz2@eh9Cei|WXK^cE%#Xodz75W4CUP&_W7E?>F*T8@vu5lvX zq_fM;@896|r9+PLeaNN1Cq@`0L+Gb@(*s^HOL8-w@2RNILizWMIXm;qchz^&|Cn!+ z3-Ek5qMq{o^q8t{v?)Vk?;lXFRzAd%m(gps$1JyC<59L?Yr~4xFdylr~3j7EE$nnvy{;&6F(|sxn z`0reQ+xfrVqn(ZWS}EZ7ZdZ3je(%vHe|daFe`O&q>5!**X5usFi~jPXUc^?cd+B=& z^xiUBCq4hSuf5><3;LZX zE7}{D=kru%On5)um_KH7q*1gc=WF`jgdg(S_SwDoIH&JT=#EQ0wfEdC!^e4oQ~E=B z)azQ>3BFHcf?OiX_qQK#^6ynB-&qt8x}J5D^jUhY9kO zhgN*%xg_#11@%Hc=!ZJ}mYgqN6BWUu{5yYMp4qj@IPt&0(;7*;==++N=Cz+;8awI& z;ja1;e_d1rkB>H8D>V4u?>-j)i#Qqad*z%mV!>3x5|csfssw#6az zXM#`TGadX+Wj622?><3>f}aWghbRY_{svIj!!C7KDENHkn_fztGs7Uy%OLyhQf@B=w{eljr57?@r%J z?Fe1s5c)E~PXPaq`@NrOEg?8G&m|zq;1$(G~HjrZq!!PlLXei~d)J4GfD zGgrSI`>rnV&EVIGA5lk{H)0%{@%sgKls52hUVZx=E#?zyMerTan=(?`;RN5)po*T( zW1LUtSNdL_7yOsf(pJ*`KIhYZHoeC_0Dgz^r9ajMH+~|B94tluTaXvDpKZ#Nb_rUr zKQunPXPw^j)wxN5G5mg_9ejGes*S~1CBiNn5&h`|PW?XWPGGc};cjXV^T?~;4;&WB za363Q=i0HGdTJOR08Z<^0r%fNuVuL5l=O$@nG5}2n-s-xGjPhgQx!W8iv}*{5oNwv z!EdD*wLoW+e$rpTSLT}?{9SE-h>5WhQH`b}OjJH!%-UzVSQ^tvAq* zPRP@G!;8;9H8LW7V`22RiUoe0DniAWcy#M7adp7S$j z-~L6N9)d&i9^mwxU!$9ApGPu03pkClsS74g(lA_gM%qnztczRTK+A9=a2kipN>4RL zG28N6m-+fg^dU*S(kfZpT$L=Y>+fN5hQ4oq>@l8`@oA*5a!{Yoc`F%wdjCQa_>)dd_^PlmuYQYyp9+4u z>6Aa8_f13_74~OREVLcnhF+2%4 zjrR{WzF0)xmlp9$0Z!w6*o$Yy3o!XK;B?;o_V_zT3g+VKKqc8feX+hz>0GPNu~JWu zQU96neMjl~4G)_1_1-vAZ1Ak)Slx!L|oS&fJt1d}@o((#*hsF`-XCj~UkV^nRLBF*mjVt1d z_+@~f44zT-;f6xUZ?UdZp0Cotd$IZGN_{$MlBM7)&sQ1X_i6L`=E7-t`O5QE7Wid8 zENdx}nwPIUU+FK)csQH($Sj(Ym#;iuS-{`fPv5Rsa$deiF@L9k|8B=hr;8`$<)EKs7GxzNhmc0B_@acS&34ZVQE>wFdAum4}d^%sLev$rWe>Go6_mN0S#NVReCxHL= z%iA85)Du&dq5e|XpA7y){om(8n@mhZtb3K`D*=o1m>%6*G#&cr%{wRz(htyAz_ z_#8FucFuDSvUM3Ri{icCKJW!6=)Welr<`}`eUBB&%<|{TtJQWz{Ptfgv$truE`uN+ zk$6@5Pw(AZ+hfK3cl0$L5^e)d@78g1Fxe}rz;1@Q<|R=9sgW5;(Jzj=ByQ~!Dsu`{Wo`~}4kS>ejb8(Fm?9RUa-V|Y=LN6nt_MqFGo>E-EBy5$9)9rr2X8Kj15eCztR?*o7J&*Jem-;nX5cyyVyv2-Mpw*seloamuisbRPsIK^X7?ZbDq40i&j@iKjh zqj(gP5?|2wN(D~iB>>#iS$l!v6!QN!>0ct=L(%*4 zsu?Uk8fS5NzMvfack8N8d3>#qr|~pM{WybzHwSf2u^b3OoS4G@eSoeP$HzUm8y-pUdYtSI$T( zACWB^6Y}QYWqiDN4@+;Y_Z2n6t-wit)5TlLMKatDoZ?e>|L}DhhC6}NbJGlL3;M9Lz z=6Iakek*VqA0L;jc!=9?2TtRo*qxue-2MRUbAq?l+H{kS*-!cH20p#_>Txl^#eCq! zd_ev01FzEDzT;xEWIxj1P`;zR0C-EPwk)I{OAR~WMcLOnjeMzG~WHd2kmTD zoZ=vG-Jjv(ee9=mnsfh6z-c@V-t)$@cxE4sm(&Gv-n^FNwMD4ph!gs4kf-rfsIaDy zn&A%MG@fb(uD%<|a2IeIPj?4Yiq$aO3!KJNg}C=FY8mbaPUETc?)|~vn##40#*6Nz zj6=kTV#lHxPWI7w**(0}DQ;gPI8eoi!V`)t4|e=6@A=-~D_fYW&SD{j#_Zl8(d zQFd9}`KgZCN8`Z@T)S_;#u(sYJXo-gO5?!~-qhvm&c|ZhsBnbx9pgcFOU6St{_@2* zHva6u$)5+m{=GVE{6miX@%K7#H*EX^r}6OM_`y~Aj(_l)T{v7j-|-JTb4AmOH2!(M z`+%={XviQx1)hR^D6&6o;-;dbC; zUs|ypd$bI90;l-(xi@Eg6vJt}y21Np=lL4Z45#*Kyc&Mo9L3uYK#s<1tKC}zynVx6 z=|A;PBaP)x-o6j=X7FxQ?_Wd5+Nbeo1>Sq^7w2Mti}9%3C$fXL?B>(p@90ubvV5d` z0MC5SxiF56f13ZuUiH}2u6%y+LypFyp||&Ne)Eg&p7gub@7vboH@}#GS1nQN4Vqv0 zcuNG{d*`&iZ2F#7%WxZT%J&AVYxj#{IOVegyzED|$-R#A^4a=|suS1m z0`5myXGKbT9n(+ws=F`a@ZQglXT$&(`KsIpHG%j0fMvyEk=N*&P=C<%RU&xf9-l23 z$Hs>fF(zwzaSyzXkPr}>R9H}Gl$4~(br#q-ezyv2UkJhD^Z0n}4I7GJU8 z5x39qK*oXc(OY$E&-h&XbMmnxoL+o*z3sc|Ydqp3&qvQvnU6!;zq~pkAvYiG&`;xP@GYz6Y8f5?PWjrev*BzM!zmvP z4`m!uJU_OLW;n@HK2Ce(&`Vt23^^;xl9{)4Iwnu~W(VG`bJg}Sz(u~LEAA6J!E06T zuss%eiO`4Tn;X1SyGq5zvHYg|cOd`MfT2^iHSP!1C*QS^c zM~&|LA@`T^AprS{?|+`e^C9z)%m>3?G9K-&zj%%3Lst9n_1~dGA9UdMSs_RHP$;sH zljnmSIOW5vGNar)ADqA`AO5^CuszQQH*gx?Ur(wxgXe<}IORj}>mM!P`49k3`LI5^ z=tv$P!{5?x>d&NI+dkpvBQtR7&&AsM<#_ze&~F8A{_MqtDW7rTt{ryab+#P6%o zJj~QvUjYZyP@5OLl(L7(0aL@AA`&qIkRwPtgCkKDc|=Qi@+6n1NG%#+Hh2 z#IFymz$rhiqu1=@*9Ugsl%G-cI+WwB{5d22R%pjasf*85SSl)ZbIz z9K4xd9|V9?e02#0i}Lsx{t3^Ap9+88oW)NYKwQn>b=**O60I+IzEFN!!JFLZHy^Eg zdA#k=X9rJxMW=m<<%<{VcNg%LH4RIH-)jr05c%XqJ^A~~ppn0oWVjzV<@Z!qi;qeH z7xvP9bh_TvJ(d1{v0~<|()sKUxN$vV0?+LK>Q)(ceM-*-lD_Tje{*O&(qmz-3;Qu- z?`!*Gy&7h(6MCtCuC8hMJ-?oD1E=em-L8cc*tHn zM@#oh62bqrU#(shvdB_diu_4L{@cKt{mI$K6~PlYjUUo?`InJ1`S`J7|BdWDwk_Mh z_vd}kOa0fe!G_*^e=Y!=`fq8ipQ`cwIl~JX589ubIPbuL{PyR};BCM8(^q_dj>eZ2 z_`w>dH?aLVO`76)gok6ke?d_a{yQN@<7aWHAKv2kU);cH{9GOL&1ruB!Uvqj&!X)+ z*YWrSfYbQdQ8)H5kB>pM@2gXlRVo@khc@;f&f{YSPWN99yp;78kB=2N^^eOvrw70P zVh2wBbNiV+p2yD#ocgEWg~WO+ep)wh>Yv72kKW?@n?B%_ucP}}+OhphtsVXcz}q^q zdmN1`p3iRNi6KJ9V_s4Fp#sR$u>Jzi3|{fLjom7-d^X{}gAMq{Q+}IKnc)u9Q@pY- zUFcSY;V$6h&#uho4POQ>?DgS(9*q|-_$QkskExoe3Ohu8xxx2?H!3S(vI#taXW_mc z*)ycZ>~GY}9c5pGJDleC)2zU$ z|KbXKyPw}rvjeAm?)Po&WBh(v0R83!Z|#STRW$B+zSH=0gI8tZEnmTW^4$P^KGNs= za(XqE?*=>vpwmjfw@?4YQ=Q=^)KfgW-2M6dD-2HrPX7Ga>Dr7Mz=gejx*v=EUmN(n zH~c=SrbiWai2So*AJ_q2k+NIo*8)%Al;66a<@MtNyYc^`1f?-QpMUD7c;0G#ssqt-QMviNBY z(b9j)@21s1Bmv2$ruXTXGWq9RcbyM^5mCrl4!9Ou5 zeP+FsynN;JQhxBGzp8ewesW&ENAcXQAx6e$$cz=`8YJcArz`l0;6E8wc=T(Qy!=$~ z>3*gi{Fc@FZ!st2 zGxXhhk`nWY3(pst!CO|xyrMDe5c#5fzSjockxL(5Y?4p=%IA9>;LkjKds6jGmo|CCl~4kP54RoYtnFjZBt}s{pe(=MBsk#3BSF$yiEr@=ts0i znePQ;Tng1lKNOQB_0V6zPgn3w;FsyV|E*XHF=Z+Eso+z;TERat`bfRFguMJ@@M(NI zz#lc?hYIn=ynKs-?*{+iXvb#-@{X@O-<$J;-(uP5`vt?*hw@r^|Hn`;cbtg$I^UD| zMbB549{%Sk>NA1cz^C{}9gWaZ|A;*DDB|e=zrxy`-F126AC<1)yTG5bz;Y_a67GP| zp9((3-v@rmv-ve*^Tt0aSrJcNA?fete=BW`Gv?KAQSi;+*V>rYAU<#Wql^msZQvKV z{K=>S;p#*0k5|TDP{e$b2tS;V_o5WI_#Q|W`yA{Cb#j7SFVfAs4c6V4W}jF;S@1=k z>h;o3n&;^K0q@OCXhHocxZ)7)dld6s0^}tg+$Y>4=UdV<`9r`E=m) zUW+GFp4Q^_CjXeX zF@G!jTcBe8PDUJ!kf-@O37@IY1z*hHHq?vH!8mKIiuZi`8$WL-FmZ@}aDh+j>6*Q= z?nf8}DseAxI#1P@_j7NxF$9O?>Gzub;2rJM^kF2!bw#D$+52U_e$e(=!&u;AT-d*s z`9<@G3H%?iHKK0o*oi?$@v`Jecr-<9@ByCPLC$Qg>s_$8tg zxR`&E+2^1i>g=uZzH(J4Khk~qu%8Dl-!JtApWDapM$>iIwu=Asj7*Va5eNF+>I~?0 zcC7P=e-9%Q^;zFzowq;GDGKtUAJc%RAC-7EKEG1m@hzQ?U|MKCRK9mwUtIcG=J|mm z;=B|=LuwP zUB_QuJfK26!;Qdc-kERus9ynwTY%HNl%pv z#dt{FDe+fCMerE%0#4tXn|SEJ!>5xrx5&|Nkp9;c6~QB`K-RG7zHKwb|Dt~q=gM(H<8jDl zTYo+tP58b&?eh#h)a5;Ox{#Lg$s-*Ov@~7sCb@w9~o&~)| z@ES)qt)gZ6(}7!nznmb80eAS zhUUMhbmUtG=2Z*$U9L187Mn^;SqlBB3VsUs2QJ1%(l{k4k&nsXr-L_TM8yMzQgZbv z=l4wT`tFG;q)#SIxqRh(nhpMFSH!!8lfvgaVXtyNHI|lfYd+@8dqpgH`O5h;3H)DP ztZP#=AunHPPb&CTuU31nm@zM3X-@|D7TcrM#r1jlN_(=vUwy>(W{F@}B4lVnf5mxU zIll`)%=^ihSM_D2{}z-27w3H|`z-p6#&1edxsK`9_gOP-vS7>erscRCr)el1kYCX_ z`)X9MANV28vqtc;y;9Bv{=fG!qN6RGE%oR89vJvO@ZHBB@74wTfgeJ@1-w+0y0X&G zJL)!t>3g{(BlsDgOFPWqIakQfhb(9B(>jv#X`hFFpVawYXwg8($!-c99o3{rshjGhJt$ z+HrX+mlb@`Zx+RRDwXLI{bp3WS9e#hLtBKbID+lv#_2z`7rc)I{n;q%`@gK9mg<7` z1fRn&N~QX5u9HM zr#v^}J(DGC)c+yE7=lCcG>%e%&+j;7egx(np`X@Q`ZH30`Ldn;5f&-W^N8M~ow!r3 z3nx8$Z>2h)`H|i~=zeSCiZWie zN49N@PpJo3SRiH95fhtt|O z%r7397CEjcKm6beFY}8B&41G_#6_zuf|YyZ7Z3BxG9KFoJ$w9L;$Z_n^7!Pc|0Nzy z@NJpeNB<=rUhs>o=zc1{c<8%^$0Go~@KT&tOjV^n6fdebfR_lI>UD@`vZ6kKacF1t ziK=LoAM;iEb$Pu_?NCYQs~FKh@JM6wvL>|dj&`y7;CV%Dsw>YEUx0LI$b0I|uT7dO zK5~31@MUAqR5;zgU_Zij^`!jgz^iQftl;8YqP_K{ ze6mT#kKVue;FE(_HF@XJXbX6>PD;h+@-?Rak>7d6sNiSdbFb-*cjR|oQ7QOY_r|}m(cg0XG!#yRWeh+w+Mi1-|1ze0vW&E?i`*Hajqoec2Kgyzr zkE*)#_t?Z8M|4J2*dg>Qa2RLWZUH`q>;338%Fj3>Ik zM!7WY^U_;ipa1x=z{Pk-0iW8ZJl8bu_)OV`u-l`sJB_s`<|QRA+tH{z;JI%}e`x;5 zLOpLwtak%UukgdsR_@ES5ekDx?7m`;Z)RPl-(k=?(`CL=-rp|q#xI&w!3@PA=lN}G z4H?&?Mbss)4Im9>{qph;Q`<|=lS`Y-qbQYd%0}iP*d7Je5b7o?c0fdbVA+?oaVI&9_JL= zKU3ild^7lVlvc=%Fity|&pukT3GvUyzJde%Tl@dc%x51hTBqQ5#_OPLHr z{riaYlU|B%j}qnEN2CZ;uIIh4%KlA6=|}ng%+w8(Cz37sE(Kp#N6N2HpPiF8oNoi) zfzk~Al}U%jQ66!=Nul2ce#N_8Mp0gIz90RsgParmJ>75Jr930P7*AgCz2L>3+Pb;` z@+mlxeC7OYs4L@fwB@H83Z>=cE9dV-@ZY*U@D+V(UcPev zwu8UuV&!9n(T^l0?C~q-Kk%=XURk3^GBIT-_{#a)2mb2&2fi(ul$UQ)%$K@)(%(n1 z|DG&n$;(ev@Xg>KKUwlw@r1m5lfr%*_?M=PHI*>teQu5@;`YV$$&iR?>}HjU#>q5cqYnzJ>I%b&l?5v zAX<6>XR`?|U9MXIbN!tK#F$n`&H;}cp}QiZ85zM+iA=Q}nHjRsHHlLmPU@bnF3V|5Hq0iF!JQk%9nVi@l0 z60U#s{Z2X0A#wfbkpH{ti052?D(XEbhyU0oE0*ccM1N8HbsqPA$lF&nl75l=HdRv} zm#6uL`Xl4t^-XzySRFEs7U=PIeEFIh@fP+cqn`4z)8~WRMKatCd0JOqikNY+q-XX->zZyCZV44duO0)d%Djp^ryPy_(=h;>^t>FQr-zX4fW(t!=I*? zBtHc1MLt^K$3HU;o#**LcslSe7PQLZcsBIgy34#<8nv(w&xcIl`o_|~A9u_<&GUig z;RN7++WO4o_9da7{O=f8m~%ZT>`zw7c2mIXHT=_W3b6Q*erkW(&wYCH_A?avyN@b) zl((-!zh;6rbV#zD_iq~Nvr)DvvhkaOtbKhG={Lo{@!l5y7RtpnE}ReP_YY@x?o3;& zq4_Nd@)^@)UN#$lY6H!M!v7TD)PIKWx^(0HlLlN5`?@V^-X_d{;1u6??q1!`{Z9a% ziSo5!vsch_FQR=%0U3XaPy3IPTs%Jdrs4BJqn#%k^ZrQyPH|qht#l_IKk8r7f9uKl z@mxR6M;_$oK;zoA167PeVU9ma$L~(soF|6T!lmEPlG&-pQGpB zKETIM25^dRjUrdJ^Yudt@Jy6l8tipqwXUM=gu$MY>eA9;1#nT7pLnv5uXgq z&l$j{FM7J9D3i}bJ)Lj69-BP17{m3D&jxQ^@7L-U&&Ac|EwX=T9b3QBfx5%KJ|6mx zTCn|ygg2!Bw2ochci2a@%o~1H1rLEI0jG8B#ajK>OtkzE+A<5`>J;F0g+TDA^I6pJ z9&gkRy*pO;=k?3>ssDd|Tzw($e_9{XK39>hf%u5jkSfuB&iXJD?L6q?Yo=j%HtK18 zcy(fpCR*V6tq=8YN`G&qu6-Vbb&G6GuDfY{m;m0AYv0`C&o^hFy=34gYK?fvpKs2> zdX((>yVpbyzn)8n9Oe6|$n~G|e5dsp?F;HFbl4h^CM^{4uws3c1wGy0+Hp|La8(QG zAFX#jNchbd$#6I1>AI}WAN_ko7<2U-A#XwX@b95rHINtAn+aI|deD9{c(dvqs7Y~` z+T^}dBCgY@|5L%g`Skap`NcmKdNaWDy!z$u{P}Q-Z!&mO#_qVvYM9%?p-YcfzD)EPQ{dpYr4{2OXVhYwWJeW*dh`;KehHzkCMc2clD$%eiU1}7i< zXLi#&f*{&4w32a2#dVT(@zT&U>AcpVDV_+`OPC%@J9dKWjXbY^hVAj zcIdN%XZW}8KQSN(e_g1jd9Bpph;L(4Sv*R}`*B|I2EICLW*oyQ-ZYO~j+j_JGAUP{ z=2eW=JN<$cbgJrTsk+o*N(=yurCqy)SuOlRWoVRr2hQkVFQ1Y!C@tg5YhxJhN1Ot{Tb0w^h-Y{v#)YAc z^mmNTyr=-f_4qy*<$sqV^Lx{n6!y{g63EZyb*fy8LOcZSLw`|TWGpZEn-2LSaOy9b zmxs1nvNbYU6*>e?{YCeSc5L{zR783%PW|PB{cp^8WtE2E0n}4}6{@)Tt`>NH{bhJd z#$iO`g)hht*;;sinZetgovP>GGob#m0gpburk{?*!wq{Jz~6cK?q#|!8uAyo3%L7A zN+6cW+ktz5@A>TP#W>)?AC+Cs1JqxB@UqHOT1x%S{joxyuC4StV$LsFy#LL>&A`VV zyi=-Rs?-q7gD3G&Mr9m6j~FXdJdnDb?u~|H2>5pSbQ&^e@wt>ytH{EW;LIG z5`okFw6fRIdtvhr+P8tXY+bztg;I0ui^$$B=UETF5B1h-D;lR&Y`3ckh&@;3*ne&=zLbuccF?VDOaA(XAa2!IDXa_{JNLsGdiDrTK1RG z`N?}BfAPjY_N$q>euj^dEbsc0JDqWwyEt=bh`N{;`c+59YeE(4#!oNh+ zQ+^zCf4P|FhYk8|;AvkxeVylr1NAf?-S}|CZW@isBpRsHd99E*=GN&4r< z{#>{E-)xU(ct%lqT}<&gSN4FP$0rf;6rY{vUMt4qV*^h9UAlAgb?%=-A^*jMZpFBN zCg3iV)h?BoOV6E%{Gk3N{~CXG{1ES7KjgC7Ne{h_)DkG~DL7xMG}Jrc$3a{#A(m8wN1|IY1GMauSVke_vb)kPjZ zufqPJjvl4BeSYAShpB778O-hTLO=EI=n=)&^8Ph-3eW!+AG~P5`&S1%5#?7CJCEZ2 zxzN51c$?Vkr+Iv-|0q6_+OG{8--+8!{bBiEt>zf?Jr=B zlG9gc{?c_0_pe!OPbZi6L$3)uP3mnwkFN`OBJd(p&yV2#+fYya>mUE+o4kJ$k)PyW zr}!I_d3;@vC;Qh`Sl592?*&fd?^pADBe&lH+>i2i)gSHii+>{U+l#kX;rU_eBIA=$ zOy*&Qvu7W2{}O?de@jYdE#v;t_@Ow~`TkxOkDmkbY0!W0;^GCoeHU;O?EB1f_Be0f zt7w1!_Z8~!_G$c3ew3`_`<2H>*H!vQ_P_AI?dA5FfYbPCSgCLWZeLFRA`g=Le^Z+4 zSN$%}FSLI6U)B0jv&$S*k%WpsA zX#G%U>eUx~e0vG+Cgbqduzs_6{@H+=fIDJ;f1k%E5%mj#Yk^0dBPW%?j&edhvB>$|nzeD34xJ1_76_AAcss{VSI|G+7}qkVTO z^Z4qzWBg;kVfsGJS{`2$aFVZiqx}awK8e67zOm8&-s9ubhW2gX-5*xC5YJ!A9}{>* zD?NRg%j+WKxTE-vG#xQ<|6I`PMfp;f^&j*6^P`^RPZhX0lJ_5tPs)R+Z7b(+|4ddH zAF|`ED;-m~eTjs_{>`P&)Z^{jfK&UmS~S?n+o$pALZ1CnwB9owe;4FweRAUV!WP^< zFK`+sXAGCWE8C~>d7<(AT73LDpqKKe!?lE7T;2to*2i(H3eVH(3aZP z@W#IOX6Gp2;`-P3l^l0upC7zlbH~r7Jwi+uq4S}Q?CB}vQAeA$k@l@Z>v7;_;77Cr z3-Wx{AzoJCGiEjzM)PrS+&+m#V^q?$X5Wzm`V8tjeC$9nCRhgB%h_LbLf_fGs(w+) z)pM?oy{M--p>^t}k4S~E*AJZXXKJ18e-l^WcHp{R(%(*lCg0)bM+e4_3HVFDlzqV0 zpNYuZMBpD@*!Olpwtn{G{A2_EDB)w(6fAL0aH+n8m$UA8L1N`*b+gFP* zc@x%miNNDG)%~$J!)>V7ca-h#{9@Ux5)AiZ{o?@7bEW^Xml*EHb&(7Bwa1&@H89)- z+zY%{`S-V!Obxjo^52BG`hlN(ecsQd81A6`f!@;pv7ZmDUK+RiT#n%$pB%4rALP*beua6yx)t)1 zT3rgLlcfbhzYjRw_ZYsYY1n&p0>EiLnYO2HnHbi-6S(1B84t_QbF<4c+>CmadNw}L;Za?zs|U?-249(+4^rm;t_R?PJ$=e}Wm2*o`se=z>6d$;%) z@)yrh(S5k}zpWn-&Fsy9en0e|ELW$Xj^VmK(oVXM)b*7?pYnLneI$}Ut*Ww{%O^sf z?jvR1DY=%*({o<5pIyC6;9zvBbVk_k#(g#i^!R^y&zj$UwhMTP`f~>7x1a3=o>=_c zpM3v>_Ot!KeT`Ne<@;Y`AMM}HthaJme*3qkWErQ=zI$ZIZ~rzCc-p`?Z+`o?HsF=i zC*F@u%k`i3ZykiE)Nk>>_HSL_-Mx72Yw}ZSllegVw_fmmYH;-!_g9Dd0LqDz`eg9^ zJ`?5xis#B9LyPkLEOTEOhfL&EkC!K<^ZhIXa4X8L=|yANey7$?`qBRS67#ll`<#%Y z^-8;wb=PqF5^26ee~x~q)ERD{4fCB3dTM>Mv*P) z+n2-E3ySOcg?)a$#oM<+-j34yNk(VBo}l&!@2O z+(PgB+&)_GQyj`&*s_`1XBZ&;rt9%u`)bYR@i7CZ_&s+`Imhj@0;l*~@Ff-H_R)IZ zjW{28w)X|^KPTkrdSPd~A~(5xZs2r1zPrx)_1r#+AL&1N@qPx^PuDq)UNU~mD<=)% z`4@nG!$28_VWZysgST%+J=r(IKcOveUx)P~t>;Tzk4xp(Gj_<+_%2g>%^2Rk6F6Nj zTyOZG8P9(!a5u`!4^M99@hATcz`y**c$~`zP*2y3FUFR8m&eC2Ncv6w#SEwvmcNNu z-&6d0HaUHq%Uc!ls-;_7^7z?-n{XY`w!)%oJbq5#&OWk#iZ1IsmiuQ0?ne3XuyGrC ze)&+Z!@BpItlKMj{`=s60K7A|4^`yj&qw_~SjM5!n}N6ZdfpD)41Chu>>7MMPw}Vm z(Wv$}Ve^Xt^Z0rd?ceD*?nBdx(RE9@JxqEK&cAI)zRhm4EME!_VAjTLwY~dlK7Q|GbX z-VLBWVUV0(I#!Rq!>@OpkT(pIewKWB(iVQbYsL6A1Ak{y)(`x8*8toKd`^pVElTk9 zKGt7$;DaU&{C}jqcYISv(>5&2vMpnZ=%$Nqx~MT-)R-;;B&LgQs!cbciEa{#=%xh$ zA&4$Q0Ea5N>88enCQ67x72WhttG&jIgp%ief8Y7TYwa~NJ2N{wyJyeps8nu-#{*9U z{?FSS@56!f`_UMz|B{IAMYGgAxUb>s;RssygD#@+SMT!j`=0^QPP!i*Q24DnAH(T> zlJ0*77XK}an&DC4r}gB+^`kR|GCTr!49d67ng`N-vsh0hpq}n0LrPq0M)%9Y-elaj z(YahJ=)-3%t6b1XmdaAdvw}VubXjJ^7Ay)n?!QRfccp=DXxOeFiy6G-dD{O<`p1bf ze4zZiQf16qT>mA#+UI*lQJ_C^zWI|9x-aPyszE-=c+d|BUs9-~_Dg!-bCOojcX!=c z7@_%+-uHWdsi3d@Hp8b<-sGO|L;8O2PmqZ3L+YWQdXUsN5~aY!_aP1Jv%4RZiJRs3 zU19}+`#QaB___79J8gq{JebO5Kl*46cwEv?Y+=QM%4`!z%nEA627aG1_XeFoM_s~;eU z*d^#qkVn6BpauW6e;zcT{di&#{)( z3O@uT|0(sd0oSg2U6Eu8Jn@;tlY#foH1;q4d@~Zb6L_q1(^}g175wTr=?C+3DW`nT zWl#BjFY!l!PN#eNI#ej_zT9>wvde!xe}x?}pi4By{y~sv$C@hT#{)lcYRA{)H-Sf9 z@y0WjzZ}QyG=tBEvgz!97E|8}{`33L7V-_?r#yD|-tP|sw9*3t*8z`1xnO5%cp$@F(Ax~$ z{BY{~AcmV^pAGoRkzaobW_SwfqpwLjo33A4AcWyjknaLrLT{z}_v96xOXx@atQjKx z5P$g6)G&tYP#^hP%CB61ZRU&&Cw>FydM;R1Iupa=Q11Z$tZ&Eul9}PeZw6gdM3I46 zfQ#`G*<6k%h5Hh5mIAu^qxKFJb>b3s(0FkGpLg|IZ{E)~)Tf~gDry~|(R$cD{G>!Atec~n-kLlxu@MAAZujF>x!RJ8P^6xtuf8#|lOxn4-#ijJbBig6&Lcc>(uf;19 zldn?e_sMUqy0+r_>mk>Oa_7mGZMpslZ{;|n@iOPg{>lMbDM7Sv0-putqd($9x$B7;ZxUCWF7otFcNRCzMy6z)v`p&HcrR zdZhHvq^ME3d7MO`p5nxm@5DnMCsxRf0$qazWf~M@`jLGxz-y|HOew_h1k_WU{C0Ut z1}(#h-wL|YAxAG1W_U8{DNf?|<;Y)z;l%F*-K&Bt6h(oHIMH|aj+2OZ>4(E>nlw}3 z;&BoQe0c8PRXk4As5hW=L_2R4^P@)`@C}1DbT7_uGwLZ$@hyp9H#FGp3g>2VBH+VrB1mP6J)i_c!+|aPfFn zkCt}EU7FN^_j4-vw7}a>Jh-I1A3gNI=l!+5Xa$BFQBU!Fet1=fj^Sj733Lzpw(3!l z;W6*M^WIHoVx|Cw>#&ZqgFkWZ>_R+FDDOFdA3X4|pT9U!jFI-28QH%*j}tBGDNdr= z-?+}>!~(f`(A6BfYE~ttAK7OFUV3&$S7nBqP)~8P*cBL1h2g|+0bNYBn3Yu-Zbv=E z$?dCa|E$Jv;&*_qWs#PJz5*`d#F4=}PPAjCAGC8y(Cv+a$B7Pj^ZDbC^EgqUJ_==l zw8+yO5n7bpY2c-SA4!i-gAPk+k5>DO=M>=e$6uMpE|RO8ej3Cg{!qhDNBFyqd@OSI{jzpm;L;O{CLnmZ@pEQ!CSoBKY@yP zpM51O=mn|hpOn94UZegg+NyN~_fHz=$vB7+H+g+4Krbl-9u1t{=h%4UvScO0VKFS5R zRart9zje4Ar-|s-e5d-B=lp5lqxe~uY0C)ipYTc2KJs7ErY!TAf70JmK=H7qcAD3I zTr~K}KSRyG#&Y|uS7qF~?#c4(rnKXMMuq1R{?l%d@kai8a_skOO2nnW6Cpndt zeooL;IMpUTl;P^B(mooGm+udHnt|bw)Zd_6+*O-3jNz#mPf@@XJL8^b1n$qDF`z5E zt<;1}h-(EdLGK%n37}7X(exzk7jk;v{z?M<@PMW5vS^4>mj2{BL7(+kmCc9T^E|{i z-wH`052qrJhEJ3Ji$W=I_q?ezvd`{*RyrTa@mN6+xUZ{^PSwxxs<-F1mE&|Dd!Vg# zQ;uHWe-N}HPW1UDKlM|Wh3gI~wE{)nM|%_pyYE-r&(}}3z2FDkiI1ITsS@1ElOXN7(_C3J$j32mKZcln=yjl95SM94uoRpASNJO_r}w;K1ic_~+ow_&mN%&3pW>Lp}MwUZsNl zX#N-dV*pP6H(2U-2-Qjf0w@1#@IK&vH=Z0)TR!7@^p6>GF7EvPa45r5@t$MKoAu5G ztW+`F2EG)Omp@vIWB?xEK6jr(Hl?64J3jXvG;~P6h^Joy z+`OJk^Mmxu(aU)fj29m#ib~OMQK+Z)I<@FpFt6m0aTx=gem{5p>q)msrtnJw@aTu~ zJr+Hd_TA6#ORR)vl=1u9?oM%m7TJQ}PXyTQZR0PT(}3PW-vY zd=L@RO8=ctLv!p!;3-oh<|NC;5x~z4!U5sR0a61s}a1;*Dn!# z)L+H3_dm_`O9D>)655<{W1E7w-#{TC0M#^a2i3JnWm@~M9n@p8OpoO5JsK+5NM zO9H>8u*A!3IT@s6cq+;NS&pkF-5ZY!WOy2IijR9`CWNUN9zI*zP4S`YIPY!{!>NBG zLD#hR{b|7rC;ezV7Y=k*=laEikH&NRzY~JEeu=;-J_;46F_`O@1f1fdaO1UCxqi{a zk8)*@A#(`RkNP(ac*FSP!_~mWc=df>c(_^m|&n?@bVz?DJ#rv)g_Uu6nr~H%*x?3ZQHS?FBoTT5l>U$|a z3H>OZ)pMks1s?BSgWO%Yq``hyT7@=ag6FB*&;ppGPf*4NYSv^nM z|FYUou3&~!`!t@1*7zkGZ$AorG@ggHf6;)q9|N5H|KWpvA8$Vbcmm1+lS@d`PYa4}w;KJU{{23_MG19paDTq|&i{){1ifo^5-^SLsx{6P7U^o<>vC5Y#r z$obMwG+rwvp9=Puf1*Lx%b7IRU;c>)o?p@Y2g*M}KN^pTz%$=lGMMZTcoOPqetDrO z(1`1w3Y_Mbpa@Iju+R3TulHKOCk1mot9CFZ`HA=_oK#rFtgcsy{5=L)-Hv#1!J2%N^#%l+e%gBVWnngqJ`V>0#$ zW;n^Gcr8B1)s)Lm10Tg}(9%a?Tz)F>@P*RODn&!fhcNjRkCDJz_HNfy4P3;d@9$Ye zgD$Fvwo<4=`jP$$f5u?F7Z1ALy9-av06Kxw_@#KPoq0$Tf8!?^{0oi0O$%ZCq^}cr zCH1BjG=7A9iZ}HlX>Y-?c74j(_-&C*NMal4F;1rLePnTR3$Z#ic zibrGbi!D?PS0_rlDIU+>wCjQxPVp82y3D#>`-2%y{1k6fEJ@cne-!v)P_}PY^-u`o zr~XL*p8r(wnrh%8o_v2##R|HG?{=s|5qHwF3XeZ2o{~ZL{f3pxGqCuj_)bEczi!ex z3y<%#{jwjz7fZh!u}oY?@$K#pRkF|TVpOj;qXKU~8hq4WCAX}N<@qBXIQ7?GMb3T4 z^G70Z>aTA%KiI?bM-p)AuO?LnJ?G;)6*%ROc~x!|%zF z4#;?j0RA*r`O^+MtIxPPJ` zKMHh1j)d){c;fx-ME}Kru2IDWttgLjed7AaxYif4F+2@8+0#q^JSaPGp>H_ih2klEx%5x@ZNJ!Zq)0vJuV=hqy%7nzgiGg3 zQb)6TnCF+oDHf5BZzlte~r-O8zzk`U?3JpUJ?hb_&|T<~NnY zCq4^@7J0|@SN|mKqxkFbcGfn&K92xS@fUq;aW1|-j{;8dcdW*fhJ1Y-1DxWo_Wpnq zUiJg0^?Ci_`ATs6t-#5Dv(}~N2xj&t11JAA{BzP|?jI*`>hJ2-0;idOf}HT1dWG~u z_36Kjr1_u61I2Fy=wjQ=9Y^a%b1zE=DmWE9=^fqsMP+0(ps(o~irej*T`X`ma{Won~*pc6Rd zSCTh4IeXzC%V&PtZy|llJXo-d?`OnVq+h9jdabzDQN`>@08aN4+rB+@J&577pJ4@E zqq?uE@%xGN_y=CQ^&b=2{e&vj=efhekNJ;F?PY#euax>xe9zfZr3c?{iU3aWed5~U zqI^Fm3OL1g+v2L9yzB=~@qKpgY=f8mz-hnfblA5|xcye(hk>EyNl1)TcFwrg<#72~%8r~NNi`IUKs7@ofW1-h?JRVo_7a2g*@;Fq%f(3b6g zseFI`&Y5L*f&!PYFXCruH^u+!eFsMbF!@oyDgMjtJn@&8{lF>ypG{iT&&z(`6#rFp zSr>ZQ51jVnt1TbjklUXOoc!PPNv=b|Og|@Z^1p56SRMC|dJV=uz7P24>Emmee}W=_ zlmEMa+%r0q$&Ug~@wVk%@)ExPr$+lRplh7ctP70`9*;D?B!F&t-P#{A`iaLV^rIDY zPp{{1@+hu<=a07sY`KeIszcPU9yM z^d;+kld*(F;dP1lQG-4jbcvU;Rx1fQfz$H{!z{T^T>3_y%ppu4ieD@E&rPgwg*}f@ zIl6i8pPF_pC`U>N`A+areD6#{6M$2HyepRFb}+-Oz$tz&jZ}2y{z(Q-`Qy&`=G&Nm zf}Fr9epk%;y<#YnueM72>3LD_Iv-bLV0Z*@itoVNBOZq_JQ@Ct0^NZ=JH}Gn@_3>6 zjse|QyVjr2ggD^+l>m7Opu3T2OO*)FdF1*2-ZkjTS88*jl$j*SQqcSEN2P*(Qh4ST zrA=Sb`|hWz*Gd0`Y~9(QOx&0BzRyb{LH}3X)$7U{zoh@-c_`@P{!Zy$&hRCDjPLKC zf_}iZq2HF*e@P$ZL!S(KQAgBF@d46Qo}14YG`?FZTr^@i~CW66a9zF4R{Io#eZoh@t z?#X&O_v!-uoxi&NtRh8Fit{>&KIcp|8>QWXMCcPeU)oRl{FePn57NiePd@D#!C&)Q z;HW^K_JrSk+mr1CD)itpp|mkQ#5t>E_F3qaP*U1S=k1y*3a+5O5q3F!>`L?DS4VjB zzl^H2@iV_trEcWikC&gR8<07o{m4zyPthoUDG`292?AlKZ~Fog@f8mGc$6{wcwYwyGrX`sdpYx;l2tUvpPd(e<&&b=XgF*;l8>pu^N^iee$#TU+Ar_ zB>R)*fvjT=FHvd*DskOrX&1$(zWlOFfm#pj;ir9E1L!iV&X!dH7xAY-Jv|4F!{^`T z4yhjW<+u%T!9JolgFbfXKa+xGv*~|Dzgm5squN0)h}`z6lC`qm=zN(zXnR8vAmY_D zQu>eD`#$&0^+TY5@V^=Lu%MpK+C=gLmAY z`N6S6N|*6r06(om#xzP*1bpTXiUUseZCw!FUCD4Aa5KuV+(pvZIo9;wrwho`Dq6JL zu&(*rQ5&cIE&g}g7mxxzdS68Ulrja*U2`}HcLAsOMQpI#?zkpl%WB|C%~olDaZ%yE zR@^K5^WniM9vg-K67U>c=aPQ-VP2c407>eJe*^ewo#t9I+@>^00>SUPAo-~Oc6B>E zh39uO_-UPXaP9GlO5JCE(;GZ<596q+C}lWB1he# zO1<=eknezeE$H;U<{x11X-bcml5pCkM|D(M$FZ~Gqu@`)c}9wdS4%FP=l-F1p!a|&96%K$^W*Bql0++F7S~*UtGwd4q)wTwo5-yfAv06;Fyx( zDd5+E?&#sNeaKFszZtjzc(-{^hNu~T9O`L&zwEZ6VkpDSz^T86jeapN18~pyrFcNR z+d#j+Z1Mtn|Cj=o&_@sY6wv*>GFwbWgCr0*?d#I`+1usk)hhjGT#tSreODyJo#pMj>6wSL~E}lfU;ll8$iwP2kspuE3#R>rj95{?LL>54z>Q z9$Q9vNVbOdKxYKq@w`R<$;A3Yk9=bW9yH|O!^{k~p`PsNTfD&GEDTQpPWB|KT7RVX zrU`v@$mcY_yFh<-O8J1SdeT&u!v8j!FO#I7Uf-ECAsgs;{E)m3fAzn?;=g8ViKSDLZ>uhRQ`53R}OIsv4mXx|P#>i^ivHD&}be>i|s{;&AkH*I+S zRs1gPB7X*DN@^U)__e@ke(2d?!aJ_N9ys~?%HAC}nEpW)v~L96f}wSr(fq~x!w5PP z=#GY48-~Eo++IECETD@y&}e#g&mNI<{jSh0p0h z>82O=Wl^XX{NlbuT}S4*m^rdEtdM?`xI2#Vnc}E${U$e+kph)@!wPv6hqfXeS_T3a zez7f;a_v7!xyhjKTVtg{9UIIn??=();our*(CtsTth`4s^ z8IrPJ`oV=V1^jI)PQI(sqA?VL-Ud4Q-53|>|B0A!(C_^y{6O#JkINzBAgM&Q7D|8e z(J$J)(q9IYLt3p^9Q=k8I6~k>l_~=T#3Xtywe+qEQ zBSYGE98Uf0PhS`43pTC0FoX<4Df-XXKLQftSPMRlUD`waq{nCSr=S<(I2!fhvs+K4 zxrV%NY#=J!*Y;WSzdc{Ke+Tiuz^zp!{jEY>4<@;Bhs*@k!@Kg}SC6 zDGfYGXOnSG`SQr(F7=dpfqMAe`w$XOgI0lHpW{mMCQ@=p7HFzC@o0`YQLf z4p;lhBX%G9WY9mU^lMtEw|KWd0~Iko;~)+6f>gwn=~vl4`Jvy+-s1uwN8nKhrJraW zrkNhQny<5BfYUl`SNPMv_&O`WhhH(!dY7-WtiUP%n|?@$;_Iwr;1u_3>g||7>nss3 zjykemY9dg}*2(%}-Ic)f@73B652Szb?atOrKc%UzEd?u-xiEdtZSoKClYO0Y z&e0OTyZ?ft4oUySpp48V{rT0VcQeRNxYIqp+|R2(7lASX<%6xmFO%IwFZ}N$|A4Mr z{`l^6{~_f0#js$(Ks*T%b(2`_X z3i-bA90U5r_C`;`zKrK!-*`?0{l{JpZ)Wrs@0oXe<5`e+=1ce~8T@G|1@6vMO3e{z zr=(W~DeB1m_tb{6ze-fSnHwSC85a?F&#xYQ+sw($dA>HHp7ME?F=IP^&ews86rXWt zV(p9k>x)ah0u>g}h10r^@d-Op*=G?Slm`4!Ss zR5(D-k0iCEr+JTlkI#8l%FVU<(tM?!C}rvH?~wTH(tqYh(x1_gAFlZJlKRVd3W?7q z=_7Z^ahCx4h(>dQLbYGYkAhthpi4q&xlvw`;mdgXyw18L^>%{(LY^5RVSd(GE}wN) z__5D%BI5ZA`!K#2RcWa3V_&eZeKC+%YS1UEANzuR?MnoGM0mAKe(d|aj)Q&4pr3HA zYGq*`zr?uEXOw=R*iQRD>(F7Qz3EeNoBMUs=OnM*T1L#e+WR#xH~a7yGQB zZ!+-RBY*ZOG}1mAd#Ruoe(=|S>Tqe_>(Sr-PyH8hT-x__{E%h;i+$0cH`eI1>3^{= z0rYy<7j245tlJH&-p%`lawe4|r*F@alF9wooyXGOLtq8}!#zWfuE;<8r63Y= zs9h?9!5tUVZD=ou;&NP&b8Pr8<(hYz{#cNUe3cd^`(Ga}{X*x49uHOIRaqbug`l^E zN_txkNgsJqmIW5K7#w8&l0IDRO&NtpOV2>VsMov^xl4IMd%+6+`d8brQvh=Yz3Q${b{#v(=S1v0>9CEG~$%Bw?S;r zXBiA%(ra4DJWlk{pbtNPVqcj4OZpi2pY%xp{UrUZwHe*>g|9xAwNh`Ap9K2lb+%5+ zr2UfKcfNCieod_dPcpmb3t#zZ7AZest}Me(OM9C<8*?O!JD+lTkxw;sB^~YeM1fv7 z(H(y(TNa5&E|6uhZkikl}w}(F{3Ap~G?BDEZ81McN^uF<$3i^iD zLNzl+e@X8fuj;eXADz2B{WDY4m-N2z8VUM`FS?~rcI%mlEZuV~e96|f{*7p}L1r#d_Jir8cdR{+cPh{1mtLp6}+yb1Q*C#DJKeI#N zvsu8EcHng0W#MIAeEyAP%KPGU-sPVYc|TrTpx+HV{kGPc7l!pCTyb97mjpcPwoOkhy7qm6 zE49Eg6|V2uraDk3Id0#f>RpLn51jf>dFx%NN-=V4z^#9P5jgc<=IC*$xqjU7JIOZz zFDxqDSF;XRnpU$kvWfpi{E&Ure^d6&R?K*$I0-z!4t}z)Vu3yNoUPtIAlw0*?8`N4 z&z-D$gQ}2x#RX|U*{57t*xqX6W-ak+fs=ikzP{}|Uh(!l!u7z(zDKban;yRV^aqk} z1YTTJxUcCOik(y3?C2h`a@}bHPVw@8#8|m9+Q{wS zAjL&#Kg|ObOMaZD)(Y)B{twaur+L7!DeE7hS`X~$pM-et@qOWFOwYw{T0H}QfD!!U zzl4oF&lxi3YfQKaIQcK*qx_oM@1B$buCxFzAe&SKH0!nI>Cz=1eQ}DP!qFS=_tx+7 zJX#X*ld{oUztNH3^*=V~P-|*maY@=w`q^vm>v#L&U!Mrq0w?{7jd;>w@YyAcsC_-~ zLZZTbU7B-tYpt9Y;>7==eZq^13itI*u1Z_h)yhWkot}T_J(Eio4r?8x_mB$y^z&L4 zv~y?guD-zxx1*lkb2&a=eq+dIT$NN%+8-cAD%!j&)Cd21kGDQ6Ss%F44xGlxn3t;NF3>Ii#k@Ay z2&bSB{?Gx}{3-2P^;6CwA)pgD#W%gjw#MqI!+Ctuc`YOO^{XGQq4;+5tCHGy=cnr9 z3SJ^DgnSG5$e&xU4BisJ+P4Fz{_0bBU1KG~O~4%}XN6t;hwK#c^{7`|mG+gKo3VkK z@oP~}@{;M89k{tCaE!RUb%!rvPBkK)}3`cb9Yh5I|ND?b=POsERYoxup zYu@p#zOkwY?+*iT>W?M!O<`QWIN+pzk$aya1K}^>Pcv}x=acBR1G)Yh;5L*!HoQ)v z{^b7F;Q3$*=n7sxJ(=)1c`O(5sP?+Fd#7E-V{mJ#$8&~3T1>UlQ3v`F}m&hwGH)_<5M zs2EQ9-8fF}3mo|)>>khW6d#%!(%#TK8-rPXSGjt5$49@#>MPuz2Jlh;YYLa{#Lr{J z0jK=F%P?;~&#z|SFFyAFAAJXbXWKxxFc%(}8Z}i>gPw&SUxHTO;Udzg#iQ?|Cer`Q8Nj zJ9j4?@pm4}f%P%%d)YwW@#qiB{GG?LgPztC4$zlea?j!KJeHo;=ML$IT;=Wuhijz= zgufJYe?jLhKsWMi=0Jbvv3&23ji7goF4f%Mc`V=iW6`qMm$0B+Gx6g*mK~o1q>7%u zVqYQ^^`gQ(PE?8<-fsSdN&_Lcshnbl>InYlxwStf%)JCxZT^v+LQ=^o%Uq6Z8rn z`XtcrT<2VsL6W8a75ffWpM3`>=mn9`KXJD_*F^en@3H;|(qHtuuYQrYF;4c@ouT?t zzhGbeqCx-oN#x<6bj{>HVn51PKdD!sA{=}PD3eeMTs-$oVV~W0DD^j`9kf64cKoVi z>zgWQe?Xat-ybccnA=apOa@z05#3cws%%dgpuHpQqWhDe9Si;%+Vj4Sa6NFkKPmp; z`nVL+ar(Z9(g-|IFu1R4&JBahKIrLL2TuMkvfz5e=r!%Ck$ea6tfInwjdEp~aG}Tdp8Ic|J-6{ zZ;5!|m)o8oE#zszSGeNuRmkrGH=v&KhAn&B^xrFV%X{P5*l-J_(!JH|xf;X{>Ge&o zZasSqDPONouR%RVm2Wa=M6W@^Vuy@s)^||P@;zgF3?JzJ402B)@|qd#i3;(%KMs6; zKmF=4q7{14@B6ucx4Hgm7TG6oBYt02eNXyBUoNCc2CbAJaQfZR2;fg0HI-ouk3v2D zuFju}nm98uJOaO48Us4#>x*{rTt-|%egf*rZ{?yd6wIvkz@BxqcD9Vu1e8|L7tbH_m2(qkX_KMwef?my=A=l=xY!Ij_J{rTSteABt2bGZMLQBVGFy!QPKfBtuZuJN`( z<+=aWPH6}E|4zd6uK(r#2+-SBOl^*&3<^R~&0pwTV|3t_a zb)NXg=dIrlyH9i?9?1VL;Pdm`AMMZo>VKpk>i0-`=gOVw;o^Qq44|O;~)l~FLttQ^4AaXz%$)w+{|A;n1OG(^7kM9`oRYL`hkwk zc|W9}p8BC$(LRm*^@9s^@4JL9;{Bj`;5`m1R*Km9U;Us1eUr=sJNxU0H2B{Dx}g2x z_p_rP#QgKc{13Vw+dFN@;gi=q^Of)X5BmIr&5Lr9qfv@=l<)j6AhCW{U>-{We}V)1 zZV#pX)F*=8ljl$`K8tmQ@9$tooRs-l;1PLq_*`gt$|zSoszPJ!9_%tqQ51lvF;j_Tq<4GCC zKD+%HVm3=V=zADZI6pf-EdG9g+n@XrdeeT7v7U^_8;zGu3(!d_A@7UzAKJ^7b46LD zmP?aC1N8qcFAegF@B8g8eczs>iuU6g$^01pRQe$e=S?qUoLZH> zf5hpNU~e+yMuG43ifSKKTB4MtKYzu8zVrO$4u9tiC|=_s-wOKu<{GbpzwocS|LVzc zn1=V&q=H^(;P$`DUPQCji+ zIev+8Nd3k0g_!5m&?^D_lpB)pnbV7TE(P^MzGvP>91xxQs2pzs7xQ*%u#AHcQQ^MQ z=j~&YhxnVfX@5%hLfWs{xVoR;dE2L5AzRp^0bevqvL^wbNl!s9?6II;d=_zQHb{Mm z?)K=K%>^bd5oZq2n<~gSd7ooZeWDe(wz13)ikDLVy-V*+BK-wUzeB18UcN%#yriSR zlQPIWNBmLF0gE}m5qx@`Y=6`UZA+f7O+I*)QwLUj&exyYw}5W+>h4{GrFkCvEJ3pW z$iC>=4_9;hqIO8!0sfYe`LA;Q6tAS+R@_&QJUKps+egn6w4i%?^QZD$fAWtW_^YC! zS4e-i9&bn%mDG0gwlG5WQ~J4H6XbmTU`bM)X$8{+)qlwu!0trc{SjaVe=^Ey58j2U znpXc=$Z_K;7wYME%4#@v9~79lM1N{tOMlS1;p)~y6W#55E}=&T{7+>lK8xQ^Yu>hH zH>Qq|mu{BO*}Y`0c1yq)EFQ#++Kn`0#g7U208!?b{*Ofihq9 zCU5=P|3=z>sDiErx1Z#b{mSrqk9qqfUl0D@-hQaW+t;Grh_c4tlOFlCA9%&_tB3OO zofhCde#G(yNBM2hpFh@R`l%ASdh@p`dL%pN zw}an-a$D5hQ(S*1&ebd4N&Avx(@f+)cRO#$7AnbiLt_W_V(kQ2MoB&NkkfvC#8=m! z{oO#&xZ_+EgL=w4BPLc$PZeSuBmk$pQ|NJt=hK(9?vLxZ*AEf>C+@it0{qJWwZgvB%j0D~! ztcmAYMvCFiKgCA1UPAoQ!0EZg*E>Vsp8jRSK*HmJ({qa~hgSx#vHiS(L?iTpw(^}(RnLA@l0^aI6ZD&#E~Qsi#4L$f_GLw49Vz&Y;4`5d zWyrLfzHcaS%VBT+fAsqwaefQ<>?q%T-Df&Ie~eV9)Jd>A8hTP5aDcw?vBV+5hh&p5 zOtedRL-9%a=gNr{?uSM45;*0JNZ{q4+<$+W9hN$wZwmsH5l@v-ndCHCC}f0~be z#(novxZlGSdp4abrcjVyGr#<$h?if%@9Wn{@Wsymq0E2zH5zpJB3iWZ=T|fEpkLc` z;C{8Cp8VPFNk%>CHNR2zIsW|O z1l@yI$FeZLq>n@5|LB@fh3EYUrMKPZ*A1*oIY-13jh86U#lH$$CF~@>(s+phUgpY) zt=zr@ANeO&EO^K5qw!(|U8WsRXEXa$j!xd|fV*}|O5Q%n zw}LM7_NQjnzACP>xBaH9H+x9$%Y5MkAK4!~>qY^}d7}T+DrqsiYTpXFKOYY+z}gQYep<&? z8Gon`=coR2g1^(oE2TI;$yWzSKiuEgWFqr#`gtJgpSH~kAK5pIS*;Ek8wV}O;PSY+80iS{6hC8c>R91-e;d6`NWIc zoZksPb+EKQXP!EN{`8LkUdg`oCD%Xst@nM3JzJqh{`h0Se{tQrJ)A!Q_3BSj&YPl- zve7-Zh|ehCR+OcuuJ0O#028W_vG#1?j0{fz?gZXtZtJPErWX7WWPgaXzxKR? zZ89_dWW-Gb@ZFhyZjy!JQNW{s7ihaEFQ!|Cke`h47Xw^5aa%B*NfCGq@C4vV#bzGL z#^fg>e_4UQueanB-RKB@HSlEM)jB`vl!NiRFdsUBFaA5FJUuTI{E3*))oN+~weGp@ z=VJV3td}Eze>3w~W;!n@_)WOKiUOW={LF58%p!0L?muII-#>gZKb^_);J80e0KTu@ z*cx;mP~b-F+gO3`3P_wo-w6}A9s66!z&8&t81ggy^}wCLGlY-3L*FS9`=WNA{YiDG z^n(!b|FVumlb*t(7x@M9{%sv;0`9wxw4k2m<$qg8+Cj(HksiJO$93Aj>8;2h{qS$= zv`FB->$GUplivTfPKyT}U#AJZ|JQZYzv-O>x&O9~asl^UM`^;Oy`=ZQt)q0H^Ib<7 zQ2%e^FcIy>fzEdvI?#`1;QuxbZNUF+9Hs#Ow{hqK{%_+@lTrHN-^QU1_`i)q1Mq(v zhjGBY$Dw;a9r@o3Jn&db-Gb<3PaaUn{d&Sx_k-(jJOz9a0g~?0yUM%hyLp1&1>6Za zBPP71;~}0rtx-xo$`{&op=pTPSIJ6V*>c9GPo^hW`15WK% zh`iFD>#qou?Q4;*c5V-N&*xE_4}V#8js&h>3UFFabQzeW=K5*zd{qJY>Wfvp)}flr z(mo^TPOYx~J#U}n>Ohw>_(V@ z#V6@;<@+m1q^Hm?1^g7B2L^4(!S!YJX|l1&LfgiccN=KKwoGo0@a|;(${eUGH@F1=r6ET-QpDgH{#KujT7B9dH}UR=b^Pe4Unp`nWcd zzvkjg3;8K6m@!|?q*2J&?Z#g7^MmK@6?dH%4Wp5muTqih{`{zw5%{kJ}Ap0m9DgiO*d zYJb?Jj^}v$nrzyCk+i?YtpA;Ycs&%iJ#K)ftxDNh*ySw}WzK+yn_qKmZ?kV}W{uKXu ztVf^N_Y~ssZSdiLk*Ugau3sE*ivNXg4h`V?k^e~kjnNmkbNM##N1z|G9od+`<)`?x z-{SfDU@o8fUkm+bRb73Nk6%p=X+OQ^v8V0TOy0f@INeWA=$XgB+jqW{`}=esyrzD_ zSbm?Gwo}dzagZ~zeK!|x-;8>i9|}G+FQD@;BEON}Y@jEo7?jCH94jI)PCglq)fbhvRenbYi(c8UJWKKrytD8%PK%8#T+&FOzm z=k2?|Z-)Hy&i#3L`<A%G5?@w^~E}!=A*BqCR%eR)0d^FzL z_bD=;_pdIG^iMM6FMLvJ32)y3oW^a@3$`F?UyOe`NB6&ue@98^1G)JV6qC6=cGMdp zBwg;Au?nsa`HS*QdsqD5^uAz`PZfEkJ=#)|zj7JZT>5^Yz_q}szY9DnzMI}xC~%55 z%6k<{T>hKJm%xqScR;_Kvu3vC?VErbFm7hF>2i&?Zvn1=extMK=koR`-e^7;`b$zG zAO8;U+tL2~b$xSj{S^76{glV58Jj)i`e}j3m6QJ2_OQtLOl-cfL%tq#`!cMqBHkY- zE@3~-w>sDt^{LVYuAd2fq~C*P0hzge7T}cUmJDc^o9k!y(eLlen%}v8M&J&VjhF8j zPv27z`svBP`K2GOMDF`W!}QmpURy!he_-g**;)T%KGTDK!mMc@Xk9G5A^qV%yc$7w z_WI#KzK7>4$(+;lT`yfHEehrfBA>z zms+7kD)I4d13%@Tk+Gfj@%B@IQ~nt=pm994?=S!SU-KR1A5B5&k5Rd@4B`6dQBV2j z)pvnAxjy7CYNz}P$3PyxCh$}K(Nw>9-fR2=Cx2x-G2Z=dpy9_x#?P45ijo812LkCEa5bh>rTUhw?mqVZW+`las6o)(^e%rw4$xB0!&KAwLJsHgl> zW_-b+Jpbsx9|yX)jyH1i=O8JxJ_Fvj#_fFkIfxDQ+Puhbe5BGPVkK`Fm(*$(aa{kIwXI?%0)zq*a@FX(_9fcFZCj@M!W z@T>>0KSuZ8)2=-&!Sy$TkM;-d*PfDr>u&>2`x{jwx?S+nAN#i!JWu-PUi(@6{?`S5 z+P^q=Ies;*^M!tzqSAg1_6M@;j1J}g*8!*YbKE_x<@!@TFrocSXRfv7_s4NQ{B=~e z(_B9@aLNahzxvJVd<*4MlK;M9rvqF*o#&-hTIe<|1(r}JXhJ3i~q?>FPXA3aI#)8-yO=L5eVGy~Vd ze@m1%H*)=Kz{w8Rpjsuk{VBkW;2;04={&B#i*VTA`u9W^*FS!(yq`86m-_vc?`2!A zpRTy{ivseSmRZrA->({glm9DSol=bJ9|xTJX>Oi%DWt#KPj6^$rIK{}zSof0uHAa} zq_vbN-SHZr#e2MLko$CjZE(efm(K!MIZ#i1u(W07@gzgUyP|}&hxGmKugvARJ!bH0 zL1(RI^x99-0M`TWk@&TXbQkh%`D7lUc$gjhB$0FxxCwlO7wJ^1EB7~@FSp@)gk5Z< z#&Lf}rOAG>L(b*BL7B;)LcRs{4wMA_K~k&&BfrdY(Y~QJG`w z$wg!b_b0`V9&(fV_4GQg9fx|-x39MFNv^LMIQ7Secl8@`eQm(W?#4q3ts{Mfy(z%8 zus36#q_22?Xo0&>)>>F>GheT1BD~|_)W?~PY5geV8zEN*y4Eq-JMs0a0prU6eERTZ z3u*tr?XNc^i%M#Hz%UWrUD@eX@Ax)Do@&{hyA$>$cS3vz*ij#oUB=n^v^68@XsZlN zkAL9QSH_8oC%nHDrM&I6j}E@c<3A4kTF^DN6)(Z}J8a08df?0ZB%I;T8w`|hf$wP1 zt`?uqD4)}O)B1k7YJ9%2fRE4;O9><@#BWPfWn~_buCr>t{hd<>%wU8OL+|;*iHk{*p``j&u1A@RNTIexK^% z@)hNz{iJ8Fzo-7gCN^Q-b+`;~UoQ+~SMuhu@ww}Rh}_;-M={uyU}p1+L173HNLR<&$C zi02m?Uo`$VzG^tiYy5+c^3(E_&3@zK-w2$>SLUQVUATP8Pjr5)+QAZD^Ror~l%L-2 zPy5}=|G??I%fUv|=kom;hfn*p*Z(wu>reT~h;v$_);x{m@u98YogbEbm{XU>haNcP zC(XB0zv23k|46=lbZB=j-voZjPx^1_M{xNTpZ5P&?#j&NQ+`rF|1u3;to4e2@Kb)u zIq{aAx3ADi`}E+?x9!0(-o6$%-7j>GUs;5=Px;A#{Pca7UW54fH-ewy|F-qnPh39} zaLP|bZk!C~`dNU}_zOSvd^*=pPy8t7Cr$TSe>zZ45_@eWhy15Ngx&IWEq}?>WiWNQAiubP;xGhZ5Rs6fcM!sLF z2TtuzT%0fc^%^4o(D1)g$%ntQ@xoQEp9MILuO2B~2XXz9abC)Z`=F3_ z4~p{p2M72KIKR5Qa?SMbPI>Ypa7ATlU%vJi%6jE*;9B4#w^{?Z|7m=af5xqS63G2y z1RwR^cUMezdHg^~?byz)y`dF6u%V%xJ^`rd-8vhHA22b%C|KO+nrnqyfdvW~~ zUrGC;GstrP57wV~e$fIaJCaZ3Ysu}8ru`!1pW5|~1yK8Z|A6!(Jsz(Kxl45Xe$+XID zW!K)r2X$p%Fm>n8^zS|EBBlSTpKfJUJi51+?!S$wH%*lLG`*s3(sr^!0Ts*vvmt_8mZ zbPt1iSK<2$c8qU3@c!Me)#CY!#xLcUj5*h=%?}OY5a+NL1T$Z8hiEK`GV!O^zZ8%(cTSvu5A~$&%7#V z{!5O?J6uiz_^l|HUhdno+PPwOLF4XkRSN1U-`rd|qa))Fasf}p`x-9aX!w%yjnISE zrc{z$En)|CBSqZpq}!vbE&X@k&%jB=H|6+Kv?b(FPNtIN4U7Hk86hVc{P8F=<(;K1 zysF^uLXNPJ@;4HH1762m(T-8HQet`k{9I;@xB_5O|9aF z^^G0m0l8g@I?}H4v*!MGuTS$afg#IzC!UL^wj{5 z1HLAAcr2ga%&4dNz%_kXD8-cExB1}5Z;rV|eI)P{;FRx|6xFBS?+SmAE>x1QdXW** z&h-A()Rlh7yQD+!EB1&^!~6w&Zuem9y_-; zYbR*_OHQ1RoMiAjQJ(78cg^`sncX5}d~51SduhDgzY=v@VB!*f*8!*TR}tF%AxU835_YNUOS{Rg=W}K>akuZegdSuMmFad3 zaK90I(7)Ri1-YG%-umHsp+Kt;DCE%^he}!#4U7HKQ^LM@$Vo(5(vmTArNwo22zkQ3 zWYm*=_n(=!3rt+XJ|}RpujISCUU`z%JXF#eL*&VNpKWB>(jzy${~{Vl|1~_J$#q~{ z9gjIeFC*$HUzUyxekiq)dZ~e%P-eSUF&E_~p?3uIwgBHWIa^_#FAdc1z&oES_$Q4a z!S6sl<HPS#fh8BI8Ll}XpWB&0*YRib?ofs+P;Wu0nE(D+2H@g6n+fBX?6ZUJ*Ue{_ zhiS>vpY4eRy#sXDW5$%u2s$B;ez%t7X&OoU&y^hVmd-ViRNlYj86urpF38J!;AAh#HKM%~)N30{Km6qSrZb(Z^5}zlYUkH_rJK`vDz`o%U)T>nbbV9l zwm*I7e%b`N&Sf8W@p!kP-UvD73%MTgcuxUN{wp$J-g)jn7jUxo8)a-R@}ICr^EKif z{m}c^#?sv0IGo3(`1m<~#0qyl^IXFJbiSK#((~W!HK4sXl!Yg^y3XuPzrUvS?$k>G z`ClE&*IYE{)>mZ*ALYH)nH&8owUPP70i5*7QP|@3eH=xUw3qOlch`-fei8oA0*^-= zzdrnZ`u8H;cz~7O3#*X#-~SAqwr15l)h6f{U<7}1S9z|c^rY=?Pv)6=hj0_g$9jCp zyQ%F8RPOJ2ge~M-fa{Es|IUZGuK4N~Pl8`*2Y#tvmg%A&dX34|aqIIRXxHDQR3vO=SOC(7!g&op`*gHLc_P$@{ek8?9EAUnDKI^c0AlRl0(%I}|bu+IYg z>*5XOQGOBeX~cN813zS)*qQGiI8d*^{>X(~J-4ox)r;29M-hpp!Kch8(!0oty z)&f_K`{gR%|InkJ{93;C?CE@e*hKg5pu6?1vYPMjn@~^tKcmKP^*V2;1-}J!^9{!) z^5>^^>~GkCk7)Tmm7o8h{R`S(Ik>0d749EJb7?p2|ICXTlm0sb9{&KR{fkKJW;6E> z?f=mGNmO-y>dNEA2!7iC(Kb!K%KO&@+!`YFsQTJ?m-ny5r~S*bTaED2ANxP_UZ}~3 zM+8#*3;i8F{O^``$j$Xrw2SzXklX|5IC&zbS8@_J3l)KRqwJR){1l%D4p%SC zUlb=JM%2lK3aQY3}vjE_%OT6x#pV(R3i?1ED|h8_~{-dvmH$9`M+Q z_xln5>tj(D{PA1BKV<*0TRN^nQGe?>J>(fc*XNt!kNA3o)^jG{b$;pdH(!qsKdo1;M^wGY`_BSCJIXCr zD~{yr6$k36|6Z#Whw<@6>m|~!NR<{Rxqe!M^aHj3&FIUgyz~Q3dM-bm`ii%&#e7HY zzZ|7F!qzuICh*gISUBI?C|b|?o4+ieuTt{IyA&sUKB4*04!W_1=zct2T&Sn{?agr0 zBJNL`-$>sBj}PS|ef`aEy4KP^nRgApMtXC7G{6lgGybIVKF-b z_%}Wo$n&2a^`u8|@7R-G^Bav1(A{iQe+kducH{@eH`0#V%?>o;^P3j+qxW+etNuNT$CDoXG{5E0jP1wc$p}0F z^IPMCu`T)dF!{8fHF)q`u0K70j|!A}PI__N>-m-4hu?WWV`HwL131lZO<%P+=cOO^ z_euVV(`$0mxDxqU+g7$q?;F_hETlA-uLn;4JCOf?ip!_(KSn@*UGLQKG){zk6Zq-- zUB7-<{gAhB0Z!jPI%Z1oIzLL^_g6!H_2K>J@%tD0zP|%9WWuy2gKf9YO% zNeusfIr&WsxKF;(xaZfzxvILOIzssQzBpZe&62+`pXjz=xCnh`GUT;X98X5 z{2Jf#^$LA2+6MgkfIheQdLka*_a}cOOc|KTpFdpS@BaK-ujlcaZ@vAoWmlV({`{c> z-Sr2fQn^12sHgAKg^ZtZ;J^G42l{TOX1)3^f0#knEN*^pFMq%eJMg|8!gJEzq=+wC zzd3+!>-Wzk+QSsM;yYDR9aU{~u-V9oW?I zL<`HZWXoVcbkjvQ5I}T8C<@hd0STB8K-8Enx|2{uHzgptX+d;{5=04@5)dW9lz<=< z2MCDngeF>I`lr>Nu}9Z_zxO@;;cMM!eaO@E_EXB;8q3?a z0Vn&%-aY*fZ{MM4zuK0fS9tqWA1EJ!etVgn=YvNf|6k<~qqu#l80kOd)vXA%p4&(9 zBmL2Uc~@0e8J8ko*u#0g8L^+9ciq~eQ$V~aUewOLSG@wB z*S12Qo_F0l^?Wpc-qa49;`QuXdpG{PDdn39`Ih=`>rfhBA|Kt5r{`Ux@-My5pV#z~ z{rRPTzYfb=n76P0QtqecT|Z3BHj1}T`DQ@-r6y-9A29wQPtTLq{ln6g+h+w%b@i#Y z;kVpAJ8*iQ^m26nwX{wb{uzNgv0XQ=RDD{X`~Am$dfvTi`R?KTc~d9+_kuU^Mo=h! z-c;XB`cKchk6r$-#s7NV)Cm5t`pZ7jyw2;nnc@xJ_*`|1@%i0@{IvmpROQqYzCN)5 zcaVJ3FLUwri3|JbdDDJh^xekScLvCNNdKxMt@--Sh5DfSO8Q-`_1cPjeMk9B^=aLn z`_%%*Kjdiqt6V4d1dM;+l+V3?>vS)x@lW;r-TA56_;_L@ zAAfe>6t9<64z1zikH)_l^V#j(rRwqV<%T?s|NY;_Oycc(2`?c1t6w`}Hg8|wL++>X z|FF=l>%4s$|3LuPUAoNH~Z#*@ekaI z?dEqSa|eun?5F3=+r_Q_K4ARAe=m5^DcdapWi&c=-a;~(-K@Ja?h4CcpY zCK~@1>39B<#Ww~VpJ6{eZ~nU9u}=by&#zI{%6GuT(ldg&*H|6!L9~JA?S~m8!S&pT^^axAi>y_|5=ar;*ob zYmF@afY&=0^qatIF~8te9zTjd`L{Ih*y-Fq8{{bd^{&t9%l&fzr}#JPpB%;YQ~c@u z+rLc7TQk6avLDZ-e;@oPIKclt(*J10KgWyn{|21@0#5BWEd4r(+fVf{QX}<@+WxKw zoiFm|pF+OU))hhAJ{xd~|L6g=`*Ztrd1Tz_`up3_E4yfs;J*1S{rO}|MagqPU*|90 zr%_#|^@!lBa2<@+!yfRv4d0Od+!68l_|f;3{(af!?k+k`%Ss=`=|#H>;dEV;>oY-* z1>3U?f4RWtS3CBTp1;4e=ivEf?jZdn`_0vZu2MTMfso4Sp!$JZYQ=r@Bm z|NY%rwEhtBq+F*h<(e;^JxBH%+@E5Bc%{eF4t=dw?`l!$QiTMLhQ^iafM{chk5d;Qk6H#-SbfbJyiZyxtq}USDeOkA>%KrS_q@cG(-dgle+{GHh>_b*^I4)s%4fgb`#hh|j05F041T&O z;P(>geIIt{`TFIlfnPPp{>s~TV?RA_s;<*G;QnChKQDMWUY5Vc*E^)2 z>H)GppYN^Wne7F_+DSpX$##EphAo|BvPU@%Ugt}MR z-IbrebwZx}oIYu5Ro=cExDnfFS3U_?&(ZU`6u%ea#%s8L`oV$zwQtt$4A*Z2PH}p5 zKTOBtX9iBs>#j&%UWNPbgMz|f!j~>lTIt`?4}*imDew~Lf&2Q@)&NP7dXvN zYoAB<=k`(jNPpvvRsQArjl*TTbUk$Lx-~Dkelu{2Uxl7S-*WwQJv0^bYjWp5jXb~X zkf-y1Z$26PH*enwoUVu7Y`NqGZ=dQiz5ndv#EB2MelO%HKU=TMy@=~4|MerJpZD(A z8f2*-@2mOe+_l17-V8a?pJ(%rueiJsxE0&&1-t?8>#}1%`M>N)uk}>JMgBNZ|H+TR z;}>q^?Ykjw#`etT!$SkwFDw0`_{?<_9LeLO9|;`(J&Mjhoa;9Nr#KI6T&6kKZw5~9 z$I93Aar(0p!hSF8vV!;h&_nn5^*%ev<9XI`^Xeo@9BA{7ay7}=W&gPJmpRM6}o0TuCc%qu{HOr81SBm6vQi` zrF^g9KMn7szn@LSg>0cM>GlT&j`;itii5mvwDfoM(lv*MJwE7vuFr>SjMz_c*gG?A z439%9*$3X)6Bi%S{3zm-4BQI5{)*5jTB``$jriMvpN?pEi`Qp2#;+5&yV|}zygplj zyMd3>zv)9cAoP2&pU$@qzHj=6az)^J$m_>Q|JT(EdclvMoT#5h;4RbsyUvfFsD9{B z-@hu>crwplE97YY`My^59F)JJeLHZfpNAUfIm`X0`6nLr|84fe3#l*t@q;|gKdrN^ zYD9hR_n-8KNdKHGiVfxCPd`@fr}mfDZ&ifbPxDVK+Rs-r=RBUrW`+Fe;o$+#1zLgA z{F8skh}PV`7~H>MDLllSnRahMX1KBUk#TKjY@_AJ}aN zo^wnm3m+epUryjxZgyBf=TiLrkNuQiZ+6bfOUDO({lKYzr)dV~x zz~8?CPW`mM`1ID?K6+n{cZEFu*>t6A!0&bIzm@*c``qq#YF&@#mlyht;62X&*vACeKdrCyu)jv{{<(Pm z8ONbMK>x+=YnSu(tyo`CojJ3jUhe=L@^pS6XHv)f+&(jKJGPZJ+WmpNf83C#^>f>&S2ytZ zdx2A(UVnD#d)~f&g7ll#7bo0%zv1f(C*+Obz1uuKCtqKfv7go#kABzA;Oh%BkB9L)9{644m2@G<)%%JbqT-w7x1o;%RdpKR4{NgO_{yfP8%Y=>+Zs zekQKf3Eux^;BMdpX4MIJ{+05N`nT$vcMG_E`pNJg*UNY2>oS|$X9Q0DKSZ@U;C;xH zf6-W9=h)Nx4zEvE$W#7xkIC7A*C#vhM92?c?di

r}MgIQ)49Za?K;B;@lxckK!2 ze}#NfnOR4B|I0@$?A$*unYW6^Pp6mt7TsNLe`x#LAa1{Yn)ILM&wP#MSLgDvxuqQWpO$@q zC!l@E+wl7wZx-7B{=kypPNYoZ650@%MrO_T%?2 zbkM)PYScfxzIq`~{jZ8GHkr4tpDz7RgnaFJTOHg#BXDZ}vm3h?^Y+caqw)J8d8=w~ z^7%g=da3^98~FDL-v1OIJM?Uf8E@eIA2~zTU6MapZ-|}emm6|~7i(OgJ=gC9?#1?K zy^6W{_|?yl{*!+Vwne<)@uT%I`O*L95dp{7X2_ErV_QwQ%I&A?Z?TAjrca$5+&D)5!C~inv?Bo9ek$BVhf9{ImnFb>(%y^K4G+r}f{V zr**#ySpPxZ4c-LZu3dcnX9VsA-skY1IRWdxndpCuw0}pZM(_CgFBQMLY6P!E^uIm$ z`Y)D#Ul(}c9G3&ue^%_L_3`bkGhFaejwJgVQw?hBz8^7); z&+ur-d%>Hoik}(D@Kmh(^s{9gmWTdOrvk%`*iZ3UweN@DD>6JD@@DXId~DsZ62lWQ zZ&`t#K9GOLCk(eM^hczW`Lr^_y_naW;Enlw^6DxKcVm8c17F;uYJsW@_bT+?sMa`M61Tmr#&9#%H%8!_9&Y-%I>)h};?s9jbVv<`d$BIHg4ZiH`+%AZcjNfP z4t(U(d4JIbYO%g|D)g(mmfTpI$y*`s2Jb|t@k{G4+==tQUf`<=ezw_vk;BLFA0K`n znE%sXk9X8%@@B{z!TaH}s$=Rg+=%nzX5jN3mW`h>+^Wz&YwzrD>oeSq>$7(7j`z5< zssY3817IKUsap?RY{+o8LjSQji$*kJxDoPR@P=-gecr@yS8u6bKUZ$uCACLCW4ICf zsef;pXOC{oa0}$k;B9!^rDqd{n|evTR^W~2q%~^FaJxePv?e-rGlqLC@E<&H;njaN zXSksg>;~TQ`zbS9Fx;!qe>CU*U!xiB>L}&)^W-*d?gMX2hMU^R{YK#94c&&fVz?Rm zDL&>NDgV*rM zo`m)cH`S837x;pupB*(bTyK{++5c+g>N_16?x`tpBY2g+t(M%8;f@*-Hv|9I+tJ;L z;Z}wI0d308{hZ+@$lJk7h<8ozhZVdNSkb14aubhg1`W3_N z3jL!-{yMcg!)=gvf|srO-l;tp?k*+uyMc$la8pe>598 zv=_sjdE|a0@Du8vF7#%&8T%bC>0oK)&$KZZLM z`uDW^BeXxmt&n$v_gmGfQC~A$pF`^R0@pqrH9VH%3nfnW{}jCS(Ex@!!{I-8{oYKI zFPrjlB7E16U7yM0lOV{5jX@QxiVTx-X2@Bw6}Vm%q>g9b#XRI*D)q$Ry?mc9o{*n( z`f!b>e_%WAXSIe4UE(9;lb|mJ+bU-^&*ayk)3D!!=iYnHX?I71g@BN!R-wU`{SUO?w>2{*tuI;FYQkN zPWPdGdiXkc<0Izc&=I zSo(i|&t_u?ix0i`Fba5qb)VJ_WjN`l=Qg(0UNt~tkRFQo#y~C(Tca+rnU2Ym{siFR zqb{`wV>s!j_bOJdU+^QpZ#xNcDcE{D&Y4Z`O%&}%!T&Vi&Gxq%lpXrTa~&~jWWQ1W zMl6wWn4|IB3x^-nUxFW{;75UfGxw@JbpJf(M=1EQ;8!SF;60u1B)%9w9>usy0AFx~ zKWVrgME+>*Uz)=F2~ql!3i(!*`aaFVpAe-#x~0$DZ%B}StKub|@^6C)L0B*e+ytD)QB-5CQ_XM-aI$aJ zVN0H1;39AAYo%Tlcs6XcrN&Ox(864rtMc;?NIum?2lzpW4<~3N{r8T7t@87|^8@*A z@J+d+6GD6k{!~+hkkFszko?F6uxpw0|I4KC>!G?pzQ{{eW66s}J4Wz@J`o@HFM;jv zTQj{NUCgWtuN`^`*CfUVxkF38hb(2MV!@0(|XbgMBAe9nq~ zF%^~L*6=_+@3!^sp?-YaM1xP)mFpip_a+R167z%s^8~dMtI!{_C{TZ|moL_ke&Lr= zUZ@s&(=^J(vKENO9$&5(oliZbvO6S1KZB~PRy3Hx6i9( zcnt1Ov~Q4gN8P&M)L_&xA#ZjB)(_Lsgq#|NlYT3B?@pEvqdF+$lUvI;m=dM_<$1b& z8*Iz4&j~rIFQx9b>Zf5i>34&-vf{`IT8=N5_XpGXsQTN0(;CzT?!SJG^y7yejk0MO zZdxGiqw(|0mRqAW7M1@avjevS-)D=A)Uo&( zfjfbR{@QP5I-K*XYbrp6Xa>)6aBy%CFxHd0OX;YG0y3kV9H1+P4Cy`Y~(a<8x|;+kw;g z_ZWxv4Q99#xD#>AxxLRf8iu=pC*nHs+Q_jjwG8(Hr}cDNZ_nBghU+&-|LJ(AaqTg) zLK$uZPW9)Xx*d!1_?dxIed*H7wVaPnD{!hG6SS4uviNF^u+I+Ovu>4VXJ_pv;<-7h z&n?H@8l`2p8*)@1J{JFS6K~%Ooch1>u}%rR{fI5HK2raUANXb*k3ZFC>c9IfYF7=Y z{~H72H)`v_L0Q&+@E-JN?B(@8!6DnH_+DLx#K=a+H6! zM+MhZTQYDfaLT`^so~MV47UTP{8MjlmxIqQPT&-u%_pX{&@%b>*>c`?gICp4Th6L^zvwcVUm z{#r3l9bc4Kh4;T5a(49Jjv-%^=kuRwnq0R~d^UG{^@P_CH{>ZkBYsJ##Pin+oW|$P z_cizM`l0_(`bXn)W7El3wGQc_@Xxzawr>RQ*zy<~uMbY>Hv=!bxY83o{%CyB_=yVp zsN&-%agEeZ_Ps7LrijC z$G86_9n(58+Nb<5gV$@(%ujfJc*#EC_2OT&38*ira(vQyqTbS8Rn$_wO8Do59Lu$GtPgQz7w*|pIj~hJwtda$?>K}@a7rdF49UZdjA1lpwSa<7xlKzivSFmzc z{S$@tg9*GP-mdd_|4{v-`LTC!ziz>njQB-;FXt~BUrj>hEY+f}i2RQO?u7noi}EfB z1uo_*yTV>Kcon*Id`oebt)bok_hP$u%IAy8FVP+ym%ES`({D8^9^%Nb*RWm2!-Vb5 z!M84Qe=XQg{*;L7|B%mzR9a3|`S3HY~vJ&nu5a0~WRy-7Is zx>;U^TdCfI*Z0faweoQs^Qi-P)Hgl$=V!PJ`)NMhyf|t}0fy_b9`S&;!S!38f(&%av&ts}c*%9k>@Q?j1$+cwIbKZQ+X{8aS=bgp_n#j$D(fHk6N-;4 zT*R80uUF)^1N@=o{_IfHl9{huzq!GWExoCCF>_|Va{Q=v%DBv%Trs$~DKlT`uMzy$ zW53u}!kC$_^w$FZ!;6K+8w{EGN`LL(ch%TBl+U1xHzvC#lHLcJ=FFG*4@c+{*G=c&l7Fy4U?-8=%BlwOBf&5tL z8yRh^ulAkSHMbZ_V7&o7p$`2yi8hSX?G0x!UA9aX^daVID48)yg;9; zHR!sT&%X5Em2)G%Jm1QG{@fD#bFfMJL4QR)Btm~OwlymsUM;SViI2e3u%Ffu#}D4B z!mf*{-QP+5IZ8HG3z;$#F2^!DnBPXR~bI0R4?yoShpw=`;Tj7I+fmV}oSe zs&{YX`EuE))k2rRQ-CJ{pLAEh;$#0w@xaw-z{$U7rq8-}++p_LiYeqH_6GWwr*)Us zn~%;)*B=F({5xd5ljoNuag#}Z4De}UhwoEk$I`*$=N;`Y{`cwEIx(It6Xf}h_s^E9 z_;^l$JgpmwriI^P<2h44B!OS6(Xz-~%#N&JT&HIl-jDdXNUnKA(Y@44tK12umg}ylWP3@mBx_vS}KMXjtIa@R_)}~kS5wxnc<>*6 z`CgYJGO&H2Us=DBz^^;;#)X`|>uUTX_{#c~3jXnbDx~Jpakjj#jp|nrgT!^Uc+`=I z{W3nmz@zb<^Tl;F3-$||FK+5Io6G}}JNo;8m7m3juOmEWt*nQQu3nxf_VsLFI5oFL zy$QgBT+l~#Xm^)Ek52yj&mh7*z-gRXytWskcQ?BRT&+3~X!lp&ujfm?b{UX*D_wZ z*7A$IfE=()S6&AOeS`zWM0ST})h0^fn{`4-iNXki!U8^E_<-gJY1z4pJe>AkX? z??Ao~U-gTO%bi?HwuBN9Td__|QCx2^f-fk-|74ucA$_TrCyk&nA#fY<<7J*bw~Wf6 zHVJ7dPyI*7H;$8!+(G6HJiY&+r`*UgU#l7JA^q?>SG_-51v8xbS9M7G`MzYWPz`Y2 zKL+5`KaVF=7@-AES|jVcGTtW0&Fr?|PKb$^8TLD1pA|gsG3N+cFN*k(|1>Wp4Qbat z2zmsb?my%!wm4`}Gu(syE^MEfPM!&7c)I_GrT-PTPsyzT?(3)YchgYchp6PISMQOd zNA#8d`|L=6Pp=7jx)(S;?!>hx@q*#QHL=)F_q)2z(_Q1TpQ)c*h{v<FZODlo#83KsqVPUF&Dyt`{zqV-AMy~-|jyrD0LEqWg`N%{3F>P{T^AM)L*q9-D@;(ici-4T$eM;7EyBIHxB6}UKV z^|J52IIF$eaU3NGzE8-?BE#2y-+iC>pX2llR-J!6@7Mg@`Z92>6Ynce)JQ!I=3L!P z^Mj}#rlT@WNt0!Lv*3H4s{1x-6^;qMLBY4-d!xp2K{WP6+u|eqjV&Ve2FYD2C-@Rq zYYg2bZou`rXTLO<3##8gx5EF5n`&2I6)~VUyr2TZ9u{j~G@y+j74I$hFoQ^ZX zT2)GPUTwA!xY`1|AdaKT-8C&QvT$k}lD7e;^+T@(M<140r}jTm=8J!j130Z8{v0@P zOG>Y*%}BoscuBFt_lbNzIajWnmv4&yMgNh1)PKi1oT$^`&tda{2dRz+`q!de`_3^H zLj8}-i1rP@$-mTh*W6>b{aBOqn}CylMQ%6OynLJFU#kgu3vlw!@Xf99^Di%oqxNmU z$-k*pH^yFg`Eza3?*Lv_?C^c+Ps-Nc_3(rLkvcJMT)_W-=2wUZ@glwl@>%DXZ~me9 z|0?68TN0m*<^rF8S`+qDooSn`k5*^!n=0b3wE(BO*=9wV$6*Yo@ng9!^K|@`x0Pu8 z`1NCaIiTlN{=!3Pog;7;_PZdzr@|#q2-6=GCC4S%*YsGEc|iwC25^`5W)RItlZL7pG_<58o&YLm+U5%$}lH~zBpfARKl z{el@z@o|8+XL`L|8sMV;-KS*xbX?~G@5mX|Hm#zL`}+g92isOfSH7X+Nr6ZIE$xWJ zHpfui0a~vLJngWIr}2c0TT0@=rnFA=;TlU@DIX+VRJFMFY7zeR=Yth;G_U<(TJ$0a zb_)Gw;C5_(_;0_J{1CVv`<>Xvehdl^W%6$9r~cmd?Wt^ZK26Abfm45P{r>1vI)5hO z=|wy#pY+Mn&%@^jeX2ZfCiIyQMR<9 z%eObtL1|rM&+{nr~;R*$ozX+x|!AKh&wfPeZ;`yL(5< z->K-Q`||Nregkk9ww9DnCev}I z=zkCT#kED|wFkWMZOi^nb(8!Nd>8nXU#j0_Tv8_dSeoW_&UYyIM(~%l$YZD9mEnAw zf^PwT;_ij%??eG@eC%x!MHQn>sZuoneYUzZ{UG{FxH+@&>OrF5r|u`@?I$;q}G?obuah&z$qUL;AM+RtV`=4vRCj`3cd;a)`z=0by?IK5Bin#TfslP z`0zJjq!?R~4=(T>;LTdF<{8~*Ec)ACPxezI$h<36dH`TZa_0s(zRR%n48e|bD?1z3jA68~(;ZtghANKo4`RWGm)vVI5 zf*BqgBHO2Y>h}3>yLi5MA*Vkt{V!c~coz+mr}!Cxw>+?Lg%-Hze=qul`qK7LCKXA2jQO$`zfCi z)9N+n{yTtEK7D?2xI@SMqxjJEw7$EucL}n}Fbn-2$WuN!zc-XuGo0e1`a}A;?ZD^# zgBecpR6qUs)_XUBl!lJ{I7=*=H5i0vGv`;FA4M`CaP~##;nK&T*NyG@uqz9f^VDm*RFhxJuc*r{*v^&;E75F!od@`6ZL}Z zX?~?&3+^xVhXwLQy8gG0_Xiyx*??ESvF;x4kJyHR^W(lX_t%n@e)}Lt{ZZ}eDktv` z4{+*_2b({Xk1;UKr)1f1fzO4adiX1~^f_ATHYtCUug>OYS+<%bQtp+ie&x^GDMYk@uo zcvCK|E1wtf7W$O+)D2$0ts~#%Gg9Q_R`8YcwHN%0iRXUJZ^+E|Je2Dbs@H};W&D1= z@H(o1J~Q8?;G4m>cR%-_U?APUesN>{U<0qowp$G%V298D^!5J4ASv9p^qZ>tya#rO zZvvgwuNe8{o%QjTjr${mDqeN&Y+FZ_W;%@p%8F_k`2&=6K*= zxVy#V&E3L(cq{sc@|})1bFI9%hUW|AyY;G!o2thBoGf27svd#){&uA&RI>l71e_P4`Z)01;?Mc{3&UU1KgyTta~?cbn}oE?M-y<$mlC?8>w`^x zSS9?Y^`!+o>yJwsY8YxVDh; zT;!_?IOU%WJjac7maOvIgFK?~;{gBE_In_oE&kFve*8q&1L=6-*XzBi^Wz2m?ZA3aVgJ1KYKt^hwC{y}BX~<5zkb4w zztYd|_zSd8tmvRw^JdnGYalcTdAeRm$Lsbzi+|_G)5$nLL;3uo&C__bNk}6;3j3bk zE*BhZ^22`pmeVqBZt#|N-ndX}%fKnVUf{F4G&vChT;zux{-yW#9T|@b4(Gd2tJFh( zg+F%aF@o3p>FF=%Ju?EgoejJ{E~NU38r)wS1)fF2e80IE3fR-%!i+Q+y4;tJ}_G3jr?j#fkH+lrJXm7A-6`Bouj-RlZoj z`@Q|LV><9ee;AOzRIl&enb9Da;gsJ_$dAc$tbA7a?FPR3sC@hX~%y2z$Gqx`$_MXE0)94I=^W9Ht8@H6& z<@mNkj@m!^-}^1RJ~LFUnqxbK*<=eo`_t=FS2Vijn(Q$AJ0){U-2!vNm5uaS-j>fLnl9x@mKTvHD`eeyUH!+Mj%qjo}X9)SvbHf4-gG z(*yTC79qTr}-8#)3TVUHI)4|omM87AfcPvCSvtQkDZw$UXt7OBAR57kQ? zUk|N(cx^yDfSdo3aXmP=QVrgpv>vtspLFOzH{PG#7J>b#Zg<5XTgUtlIqJ_c@4pG- z{pkiy{dxbB9>;lqdVy1a+UKW^;P&euO1r5)>djtl;`5CWIQ2)172X8ypB?(m;LV+t z^Csm3?=K^GR`B|E_}G%_B==Vjo*le{;gQ30+9X5thaGj?1$@H%OXYJh+=Kn(&!cT6 zN9!4`dL;cNe}d|Klad>_u-A+6PU`~$_-=y0A3VQQnE%LL1)XZKd^wRuj9aOnVFvDqnbc5HWN!ylMhEx7|fxq6+Z5^8* zH5SG3*!eR99V&c;{l>?E^`gs(`~`!Uelu{&uUF-(T;ujzfz$jpx?R8F+;V6OQ-6lcau#C#Y4yOp*p81bormUs-rsh_NB>0n`{Hy+9IXox z4u5^Mf@cJ8LDBnV^RfQ6VBKi}uJ2O*N`8jhu%G9zCEoVaAB_% z>u<^@7x<^H7dsYVAxq^}^q-md;5{lgerO@^1n$9l+k*2Foo?rAp=I_^{urOixTxQB zce3@i#@#KjepQ&!sUuk-^jjfE`7wKYY6*V5(hi*RBm0vo?fLq`37pOcXb<$C#g7-< zz$u=c7BASVVfK50Q~sPQw)O<~Pw$m}(ecQbDPPrL{%MWCsXunrF<;}y6K3c)gLk5= zYZ>JY?=Q+PD|ioXlyuT@B#)OK`t0C2O~xCA(O*KJay{Y#FMd(vm?CDdD0onfZFf@q-ooq8nS>E1}QK z_tur?k?45C0sgT@9rGyE%khchSvPnuJ`{~A38ILH^8S3)bLn4=0t0WC%A$Sc{rLv) zM~(jKP3b^${m<7c@6Q($@!X*2sBFg!dC$-CIX4@=2QgjZxxobN7rVtcia9I!bl!Al zt%I6i*emczy#Fl)a`Sg>?5<%rz2Dt%S6J7?fYN; zh&=K_zy6hs%RRI3ZX3NXvWKU77S}dOwQ?{K;M4)CzZI<{R;xz8PEnf70L5 z`qxc!I5P9~;CWZbJT-w|X6o@RIqjMG%J-F6!7tIYU^1=aNlN6K4e@b+*YV9aP4w}S z;p?AF@o z%6OQ;FB{QZmoGXqUl|V@_`R!LTA4p8kT2q4K|Gw`9p2UUb^-AG@i-v+f$EV5yk*I= zlM6-$>JxlreNerY{tdcXc49Ip(EQKAp)L|H8SkkUc%&*gdt9iD1L3rObB)^*9;6p6nGb0bBroPWxz)Xq z{&&r%|4c1u>3@Ykv5I!39*rs$_8B2h{#fvx>=1n6PaO73`QT7h4LQH7s>`hj-)qlq zI7VX-tc;JZ-$GT@B#++LkOX}*5=So4!atG_e48&6?Uo@85g67pKpcIi*rW7%(??>p06Z4{`ShYW~MD)g*-FfLy(!%5x+ z-tLr|)71vQxbRP_dnf&k#P;3xwBI#MK5morpW=U_!8g+>Uxa)tr2(SurT!S$f4UDc4(m-XO%w;1 z>$f)*?L~qYdZ+FT=C8(DO8P-Q=FES;0GE%09ND`u@#UEy)?YEe6R?e0apo4g??D?& z{sNDj^JHnLNwy&JE$N|bpN@lnzi>C;z7EQxG{~1|QMjL)$#lD|E1T#De z`>8+bUhfg`Tngn=40wl|t$oYlqm9FU9sGE_VS<(Wmx%q;{?M@p2JrTiAW#0Sym7e@ z^^@?Q?5F-d^!7k)wLT+0X^2xBmd=sg zAXph6KVLCVS-}4(xqsep^bbi0zH*+jgTLftQsW#%#8%A5%6UpaV*ZMTe=f*-u@$&D z?$fEIpW?f(-B8s%Suc%VIgaRkcAkPoFJ*PyXP75>@z|Q4$?va%a)i@7B6N$7(68ht zzmmr_!`IJwO7oUvBfoIH!B#=ebDnE8p9GmDBTIeo=UwHv*=iGMl3QONzSdwDZE0SO z?dgBC-H-b6CjGr05y3J(oA%~1F8bkdk|1Q&uKkX*@BQoBJ=L%eP5JpI=&@j{swnvp z8(yW~cgy*SJLUPFRQO|u-0Y#bTr}P}-`Y&p@dWT);2-?9^COxsIiKE36$`!>e0R>V zUxpZnDYseWg+U|Zl05q1aXMc?Qi4zKnTmpbGx%jT@9d~ktdB*WCSsjM@5!@)FLe6) zLz5IE^NQY+_v56K>BskCoI7#+MRnkZRogZPS<~%Le{UM)wHNwt4qw+rZIL|sEA+X6 z>$TF)Q7yZjV8`!T6ZX^j*!vB_otjvwLC90RbGMNF^0r3d2wwLrkhfu5GPY?mEt7YU z{@pSUTseRJg1@)T1>6h${m&IC%HG?i^#C_U%l3Eoe}0L-7cEmhhDbjTysO;DjCKAOS*=k(|**`p}Zax3`Ce6)cd>Yh~~JTfz1S*M)fw=Oca zS`Pn8JVQq4SLUM!{2P58_j4-pQPfk)M_~1wh~GUtl5g)|Ei4q{C|Pm5lET^- zekpNjm+w3!co8^%5uua*30%w*M)qCU;SQ5|X+XXIwN0UxS@~gs+~I4Jf8c)Du%Gw2VK*^I2f`8#6e^KO5*gs zoyY&qatT@S5##Uwtv%oMGU&HsJG=dC6~)D`Z;%{EWVZ?D^V_XnQ8{*K8;!<>)q8m?F!NPXkVN{BO#yILE_Q){@#9qPO; z{h{;3vEXm^to&M>hvxAR`t9ITo+p5RtyR(aIUJe!Ch#rTCWGJKJawr!53SViOolzU z&XWfIqrbj7Db7PH`3C59os@EsIc5Bc54KF!TQl>Oc^dqEd|Ul8 zx$>AZ^Of;Q0{?BnlxyPoFs1#<_@siLkd%L!cuq{oSH>qIm-M%7%HF%;IWZ+)8J}qI ze=x0|ES?in@|E$41HW;^lU8E9a=xg;k%~H;2)>W1^5v^WRa^E8y>GB~{5F@s#7E?F z8u*l__i`0%nBAR$N9d)0syJDnI`=!XB%I+oo44` zcpPxLPjdai#xc1Vo&cQg^C}z@zd+CMB;a(Pmos;x3Aq`b0-TNqCLD-*ormFR!0EbN z^-3;nUWP~Hmj2VaKC;5EZSpZZ3OKFrciy))63w<&1Fnw9BmFNaQ$jU!WQW{W)m;-v-aSvYPw(em`fR{=FFtM2o$wgQ(|hx_ z=+d5@s~Kq{JPtU$S8kLsar*1#75!;0>U{!m^6$jXdHb&{ol%G6lYo3^KQeq>k?*Q;ZMrvRt;Ze03uXzX>(7~twO;N)NBLosJgsO-5( zJ|bVBf9)R6?$xhwufv2#0Vn@TEpFHRbG>#6>5loM`Ow*YTf#t5blJe+{3EYf<>< z^1dXW2AukDz}3V7vo@J2K0y)rrT^sLq}44;3|wuTPWq#OR}edVp9?*Mo9;e+-YNbU z{u%H)p)@{zkF4QseyZb8!s8%M{+)bqJM7ZIcB0h#YuSStPQT+92j07VF&YiSjmQrh z;&^2IUsjDOLw^$FX#O}_yhXs55=KJlB zC@B4>`6aQ(gzXxJC$GSI5WE?Cf^KTP8S-glAMl8=gTq3ZeO}zh5eGcqU$biKa6gBz zF9Griz;#3N{usvM69M@o;CTzLYMafN5uX(7r}=GRujnS(8LsZaIL(ix>XaRvjoGJLCF2tZJKmM>{XQJ?FAnlFe=b?Iy+Rnn$v*18 z^SLbhc>g6qJ_hOq#PV;k(bC(UF3{NBb!2A2JlW)UV`w76~fDe21)#Pl<{}|v2!2gS$Uo<<5ZyM}Q z0=~y;TN#f26~}E+=-1ee@^~Z#ym2Fb>6Qa}WVXuV@)*Z2ZUH5Q>d_uG-dFW z$173bFa2Ui>mts;^}DcFdAt$}ey1Lv-Yn|K%vT<-B!ItS*s`Qz_RM_c@k%oIaYv8U zEN;upS01mVf$yGsU}*_!X1?-xC9B;G6o?SC=$r<}2e95B|k3 z{ux!ul$o!LPZIcRihf_Dv@tVZ8J|?}yX4Myw~Qe(Um2f>V$$EyIUn~atIy0=#wQy5 zM~8FdDyItMi}QQR<2fJ2HxK!KUjWBxaga~MR^Z}1ri*!EW~_g|c?HMI0%6YwA}>BsK^ z^}pTfV*bV*n-H!qA?>DhSFr}QSKRnAybW-*5%}W?T{?(;rt=0@{Z~`zKAj*la9Vd2 zG+vl9KB$F%8RfGt$O@d+T_4N!Y&|&73&PcQ;QocUPk-d@9qR|RcRUnriT-s0r~7Q^ zy6n=};IYc@U`?y?Ac|3EwOPwo0zVSf%l-FTZ2I>FTZ|BTW8zhhZiuRTKgeNjT z3J;xa`d`;=EjwiUW2%4m#s9i)YeV~Ye*R{Q+C(kOt?-A|GikVfQnYAXt{{uVv$D?( zeVa-y8KE`@>htB&|F{lZE1fL*jq=V=QpTrlWUrS+H;w;Xkc3@yoz>fz1-qCKkLk+}~ zTftZ6bsYF*Kdae4i}z-xUsrZxJS2keDR;ScnBqE~sB`hCb97xf1$<$Fum3crPi1`R zy7G<2uY1vbPrt65J}yhk_@rvD4OLqukNygMk-%fIo!%pM zX>gom2s{D%Dc`>hpYG8xoYviRUAePvYGWE#LOu!dDcI_6#3pH(d>Z!Cb?2&=Ebb77 zN0gEFr{KEt{Xx(6hcY}0I9+#+|8dSx9m8XQ({<+yCFtdE znaXW)MrP(K^E(Fo;#(&6$`z5BPuHm_zvIELF)8#ny&}KG`hoJB>XgtZuDj^a&qgX!2R|2iJZ5R zQ{^@dzsI2J_-S9|ye{}D+hjYsNEx3$kJQ{>Qka{7DA?=J)OPWYY!KEio=BfA}~P<1!U_lm>YkmywlZyf|NsOB41B z+kO3_R@IXIeWaZ{yEbxOt0k63KYRx~$Ob+gFT@T{jc+sh_g92FfYb59qoG?)1-1G} z=ZV!W;B+sjb%mqCo=rc!7V^R`4{&a0gepiw`zuVCwt$Y$eEWkVK9PRK<|(Xr(8EBMrZIvl@Ie3koMj4%2lr8my^VSnx>%?k4V z@M1stQ+x54I67_={iUxW{iFHs=I?*E&CUzJ68511G!V_FISc{`&J2Auq;ZB5=w}+j(ivkoswjxo^ae1mBJOT9Wa-Qa;Zi zs&|4bK4Ki|n#npwy3)XxxbJxCrEHIm?`|z#F^0H4`!#Vj0_CfoXqnxw+^=7)jjkr+ z6N_!W)Ab9J9e(*vf${~SYR=^HiIAhb|6}Q(i9rU*5aS{qcrvz*vfum}%y88!Iq#+Ylij8PRH@0{g{_he>8ZT|14QE8Zx6l-&q6*Cy!w$JD&=5!GWL5Qzwv!?|C|h`_EW(- zaI?%|`duV39&ET@M&`@!Kte(541Y$H)H$H zrRDSV2EVvpp6sv!FJwKrIXA=Y*l&L!+p*1`Q;A;eAlfH+CwNyME<2W&%eR-uRg@{wnbi{yVYX7%c4^5p!m80fQeFbs|JrC*0sq zt$I7LVCLhD5M`b4g1`8$8*_c-I^ZMfud+@Ef~dcd7*~c`GHwRkPi)3_$`QdA`4)@) z;=Az6mLUD6`ttlq*ldy!^(j(OpAr@Fs%3%lJsZC7nIW&%I27;I`s>ZX8KQ0R5$)@0 zOS|d(*0}3MO9vrdBCfFt{gL1w8da+#)iJ3}>Pv-v(copPH+2Qob`eLVKSEZ-F&T1k zkRzD{d?%j-U&PUg{Zc;TxnX)3B(S#YfC5^!%2!rpzZV^o?Fwq$K6N zWP`7Ge#=lt#_j&k56aQ|LpWdg{FWJfdr;k4p+v-1^mDYLpKag^is&bLu943F{XA^? z9e&=A&I7n1ccS{58Fb!T$a}Fr1OBG6JXg zHXT~^ffjn;j)-rFN)azJvwg~^N=chggs8g!3$oo_&J-ySUe2%q@T1N?{%`u{A>(20VjLB*WSfsXSfA8%}2E^ zhwcam&h4e~Y6E|C?p9lJ7*zou&ZqI}0DoTfb*E^)C!wtJ&kcUf|E$Zh`WLZu z34&q5U%Cz(gX6|zw3BCUwl9=*TG+2_SLhaXI1zGQY^e?#>dSa2>u?nI3we=O$-U%! zME$;X$<9JSzT+jr0Y6V0-8)czah=afaQOttCt>??^ZRevdv`SYKjeCv zuIIcDn(>?;2d6=f>|5D(MP05x1$aaQ>2LV789(sz(ElH0-yPUg^~Im2Ssl=@0}6&| z8A4P>QNhU22naz@Dl_aNE9`&@0Y!?e2q#HBaIn-MZC<2XAbzQhSd6qo`=chMfJ`6 zq|ndL!wSGB`@`H@2@y{;8cxG1BFCW7eFyg&K6VgJBT2Zti=U6CwHEREb8626(>GS< z_ic3lG5%XFu&z+yGd`m9RT*z~Ij;`I}u3Vl4 zz&W1&>+e>R>svN()8oSa3R}lIrSdSS<&g^B#ui7;#V8MhS{@GYO*^~KQOkqcA(sco zhXPCGWPx2C$Y&!ZocfWVbWU;1+9B!z-}i1`H@}E=lD>?`MY;2}!qW1(Oa=e(Ezdy8 ziw?3=m8a{}UzqJ8ZZ@Qu`N9q-&N)BgN9Mn{F66_{f0gg7T!X}XY`~88-MH@|E*;c9 z)bFgap|5k}Ht*^Lt@v-GJt^N=<$>Si>2))?Ph|n(tMBiao)G>`PrO>iz(k}JR~ycV&eBUnHqkgAmX(Qq>ucG5*k}@!oJ!{ZD$i_LxoA^|(g1AoSR4z`XTzn11{8Hd0&;9v(#o<3bwwf?H$PZrs<@+*Tf6_hC z<+hwR@u~e;+lsi@k+y5J@;HyXgu8K_`=OTF?)m&2j&L7ve$G_1p!E)U-@*X!j3uHS zyNcSZ(IfsO9|E5Hv#4LS{@yW{?@I_T1nylb@DZ*3Pw;p9;rJEz_v8<)gV@>$f5sj# z6*m*oW5#tm(z3n=zw>(4gd@J~K`qY>e zqg@(p;5#`5zwz*qi80!x(X8nAg1_^2-H|ccrBU54EdYMUf6MiY(JqUh!xn#UT2b_~ zd%NC0Q)`WcrT9;{9F2ixB0l-hYkpG1r`71wXJhPFQv6k8h#T#b z-xqL$PexF^$TNui<#MKS<$W{wIl|tL8=TO(gz1FmK@Z=z9C>l|z3~!W1f1s!-L^H= z=p@|ol<E)L~^Yy@~e*2ViN(2A#Z<{yd`!x*?;=2`oI{3+_ei~=AGgG9*w{d+z znhE}h*?*ie*`oPsy~zRpfe)_VPOwJv)p}C^e!wW+1eI|-3v$FEyLryXDVKM@;lo)?#BMk2DuDdc*;@={dbf_a8}>_Q z?kN1>?`DrQuk;uzpmMbVXTR*}_I~Ua;ZES(Z(QhJrjPUHchR_eIai`rVNC zAw9Wz^Io1GP`{wYEdbu>?Hwkv@2rpNi5fS;sGj7){}AMP|7A@l;XnICe5xlFTo>~3 zM*j}6FPe3yNWDlOTlj-fXC+q2LFH`)--YLK>Ck6h_4NRrzpw=H{htZF%+CbB(Wb!U zSo80ErGDf{_J+%)cz?#nkNq^2@_DuELf`(ZqDW5{#^X%S2*3IHW$SKx&mI0dX$f%& zPX*4;FFy{{{-Et^8GiuRI)HP%tMW#h2O1exZUL^-D9;CnEZguqVRTTv(L653VIHq) zJ!ZQbhkl;$Oz6)>dg(%yWAgh$!47yo5BOb6K~?$vA(juK96o(=S_7>$l6@rq0?3&< zi#WVEwBesRDSzJIk;|ipWkfS>r(~Z4a%|u4$veBq`DXy<{Qn-`I8)Z237qYG?)Ifm zc)u#rpADSbRfBt%J%s+)=km!stKBEdr$Www^jfQz&+8@qy#FJ|FMdtYeR0CPNc=M)$NN9d`ef&~a(uIa zv;D#Q=Qok#n+u%nvw!-dR*o;nho2j`|LML+>nw?n$tnEi_%>Vj^Wb>k)bH^AkZgY{ z_|p>$e&sm9orpgLu*U)3AEy#3O7YNzUM$@Y9(iof{jz)(cZ0xxCYGoy#Nb->Ek^ z4y2#!Q#yEkEPoYA{_8!sZi1bMH*0Rn_GjZd=U>m;VYZxq4&=GMH+3}aCg<&m!n+{L;Q>x!#CqivB4NxaC<9kLy1dy({~}<;C`#yFGngoD@$7*vb*H+1IvEsA#$$~hOj4{z79@pBB?-!TL2K9&0c zqy^yXj>q+jwZEe}&Y7MQ{@*j`g(gW>j*v(xuIe~v2mk9g$2N&IPgch{H~5>U6?pia zKF)>4b9I~}jOL>S81MX$4JyusC_kZ+WVgUT#<7)QcbzjoM*JV9n`*dmDME{ZxxvqcSJ;ZWhTwjFiTwhbx znZK6bOSC*M{OA7X(KGcfYaPN;l1~H9_m2-HzTZ98dx^mp#JHXgzVUhAn*Vw)k$+ds z1Aa!^mihnnULy0e!EZaQ><9n#UScl%&I5mS^Y;>Cy_cxL`vO_un_dv{pa@Xh`MpGr zuX;UQ;!}C>dx>sb&-tWiq+A}ExX%78nbCi${9a-Yf{C^`r_Oq){U*;FRU=E(zn5acesOm2uV3z+8>=1jd+p43ga74!|`jk(zaZiM$%$l!13pK<=-d28yJ^fg1aEk{j6o) zyfRt|_X6j3@#>TwedB@Cc&f(J4}SM=CLh*?`(wHOP`_*k9z=S1$LV;f9qa6f2iK>% zt9M_Q>yt~dXJ)l(-^%vddWv|kz4PM6ERpS1%hL&d!Ht9cW7%s4?nc_8+TTYdd-Z-? z=lH+&ivAwC-$~sq#uu)?fejOz$oF;mkY{{+eoipnT2ekCyf@Ey$Ja9cW;`5!qivti zZ|x=g=I?fum$5v*rTXPrE#%$6HNAzOr!GFf$e`Fu zeD^EDKYqX43jVVBb4D9+zr`y6^1wN+cfJ_XlfQ=~d)5BV+(*RYnZ+Gmj`ba+ z+CFXIw|!VQp1y;W+b8K)+lLGMltaEX^c|$i=lA2ezw?1#>FG&l={rc7PxBJ)@8s)| z=SbWyK%U2;LY&Kd8i!1Mh2K;*G{5G4gZt6^_2T}D@L2UCtG9T*_V%Q;9&S&>r6X3o z$UuHCAH3R}pZ5tiWt0N2SLii2;Yh&zu*<&Xb#GTtw&CA|3kKgi8|cFp&?5?rgPF65sQBAUNO zU0(c1_oZFvl;q9B1brf?}F%` z&CKsF{44D3@g)YBDN^G5?-B9gdAc3^!AVC~CHbTIUWM-l|IU$76O(<>d>8oK|N6n7 zqxsra#v9GIgU`=9L*Ne@YZ+WN#`u-{z38u*uNffxZFzWmyA)Tn{$RDz{@TF*;NdZ2 z%+ce4(Xa4b;LqAKykR+ew0gknKoK9`j&`<6rRm}J60dP7@0~lrCn~iUFZK`ReMWQ3U23fj z2}Oka!RLMC7S~S5jF<2raNcM1TkG~qItkAQ&illb?>c0>UcxnlVE;`Dbj%>( zR^UAEshs}uc%y{dfwTSP?%m$XB;hXL0X)Zj_+0(I{JVD%|ABLV^6=ha0}~~AKXC3( zc3Gb^%lotjIe*;$40}6&wY*PjK5*_&4#dARSKg;pGg$b~^MTHHCtAvuRRhj{U$mzMGmq zwqKUdt0&}FLVi}ebx*YXu<^slUu#Ph_-f#1+YEc@;^gu_vwhwyF&?r08hvgQ$@=~E zh5TB`?+wnG>FsHm$@1(U%g`? zGK77Hye}{0dN1?63f~5PtLl6IAG&)nd5d!)IuqBokaj%R-G`&f+=_;@skDNMM*~Lte5+qS;1BMe>8@&v=DWb>@yrMQ^!s|O zt!9np+ZBEgeD@Kr@g8$D->TSO2!7%5eUIK-njTsARL3)-&^YJCIAa|q;^jn2IIX{D zNaqp0vMv++1NY5gKHbN7m2s2w(EK`Z{Dt{Y6N@Te#v@=_R~S!Otx>nGF(d9wGc={dYUoa~dVwrr;gd4_gzy z4UHU>zY{o*r?t8?X`Fz17b_la@Grl*V_zcla6&F&EG*$Jxs%O4^qAl`QH6=qZsec8O@i(b6N}dSxBerPs}vhVI&gL zul_E4F8GtStSb}a{W+uhyX{5bf6}>Qn*?jLe)V_TQ%4CuJ(u51jq(1RQT^Tabnve? z`T1jh=Z$lr{-IE5cbVW5hvMsRCF0NX#@v6;FV(t)2Ey~e=Xpnu`EQ%zCA^6BVcuBu z!hnBu5^iw|e^~#CA7S2=%ksV007?y?KKI`AK_G`ee8 z_3uUCdfP=&pVUfvfQa%oFD zU*)*T{2Ya!0sioh(ls1M=2N`0z|R72ORFy@C%6QI`js@)R}a!$@KSmt6(pivvOeOg z?Wq8Kd*QVaNp@zI=vUj5WsHc+t!th0l5Np^wLLk&FZ_L6GyZO$r6Tq`BFc-`4Lso2 zDjX0ji~dvQtL-Tp{Nb&tJ0cI6nH)~3A645E!PL%jxSc@WG*743S+D3{i%DfX^l7{NeAU`c8Ge#m|Mz^>{f9Sr~cm$9`CbK z-2dY`>mxqR1M(!jrYy9%nmxfoA5 zUJmfS9lv!0*A-UKoM@Pb`Ub%sDoc>??xD>)aoyOE-E>er%)ow19H$`o z0@vy?f%AOz&gqx`i3o@PP&ummG_rlpw(nPBoy@0tXPzkHWkdRD`5ifI7vU~k=Xp{e z#~fR{RcHw7yOj!MoZgS~wxh-jdUjC1frG|0eqzX=kpm_*esa{95gmt)9N2i&m?8Z} z4xQX@+|W@YBW$V%e&j}BlQpEPghbFUM5qpn`e!=V!ez}J& z9hGPm8VKioVr;;FUem8~l7u^Po%jDZTYbekc^{Wl>@(vA@7Er$e#zrOL_e-`yrxZD zUZ*VdQ~9X-4+p?sZFlunzvm`>UicXT@8hRltik)SQ2aSKoYoYsYW^esBLtqk_AL9Xj|3QD`{VT>@h`$f`%h%hCixvL>aMQh0 z9di6bxX$q(Qn~f?Sn)3e?dD*qLK8~Bs1jr%KB{58nO310Gj zp26j;~1e>WP0foN_t*NBsM_-Glm# z={Ir!7eJ)`zoOKCoS(LCjO=wt*_5jPz`q$#VQ8%Q`+#r#uHwX4@ecqW`sIxaa{NQM z&hh_v+xs13#lH}|eU0CHSdPE>)zbApW!BEw{}q25_!&1&u8tLd4f1hF9pf5m^yxS@ml4HyTe=zsjsPZuNgALkFGl{>^lIsQe!+g;x6jTL|M6cGoP z?b_m4@wWm0Az^iOIsQ&u=lHK}>{t;i{%-KDXn));$KQwRT>rc8Ea>@P@ehEX+vs5B zSn>D5&k%Ue8S;~PzbP6|)cJ^Js_^^k^>2L=>-RU+`G^(#HqNS5Ds!Nb(mYR{j}S!j zyh6-NoRH`5<-IuPG9f;-uPj^_^6|#}4PyO|=TZE<|G|;3Op|4q@5Xy5JdetQzFM`r ztp0BMsT_IV6J93{BA=GdlSb7)Di<|hvN3XB1-SyGoUdh?@Spu7 zK9!3N*M)p|UxGbi{*)HPJnCZ+pTEo8*Gp$3R>={zyO^J`SMc4?xBJqND|%}Qm;NJu z9_~N+{?ZSAqf7S3_cJliRwI8{+ zm)0(FB%JR@d0nMvorR<0oDx1$#KR4}N6&8QtCescuJbu~zQZo18{il7$v-D>>uVw|Q(nmGV+1eaKm1G2 z6>)lLz`aYf67Gf^<5!2+HpELf`{x61y5$w4PQrc2-;K0)lYb7#@!|ccLXaP>x!Z^1 zL-rNoI>%+?hwkv*e*X(!0TJ2 zUo%7a!{g13hU;HRhJ3g_72C`0*$RIBqWw3@*kC9Una}On4!&pc^Fw$XV=3aR_0J7{ z%E}kdspA>()%NTMzisc$Uzu4kQtIcT+H)AAc5Xxc2|-@-MoBvl_iI{cP5H{fcqe>FE@AIml6j@$Y1W)Io~Ykse7j0 zrda*DnlITz{kjKoL8NSRA(2(i%+>b?^7AH^BEDbY=Yg;5 zJ1jksiAbsZ>`#{-*G-uv@rblbw^+|h#dDtA&pz!Y_cQ6>TQ3SdtHystqBzwzgfE6d0zvTKh(G3m=bxdu1Jy3zP6En z$|`Jcc>IJuH`0Tzo|wb!nEX`pCqJnD+Q9cA<$VnTIAeL&LVf1e*9K7nd*38`>tH({k7>h-*1KGb-qER z>woosa`sc+bdY}2eBmGG->Z=|RN$Pyd+4FcvV9KVT>qMN%1MyzD}Y@Y;8n~W zzeW%JG=5|P&qVoTa(;6^euC?Puom`$pABB+*Jda4Jc0b-`v}%|e)8gaa(xfsev{+X z|M|?X<#^@ccRk{e>HI3G{pI}Ae5K>HE1;UXtTw z0iK1l_mUQMV#TWn{^x+V;Bv=zV#O;Dygcw;c(})$1gr3f;-8IvfyXt|Tf)EUKe>*_ zc%Q?Ns_;|6@4e~6?MWOcq}0!={Vze0@dbL)A)n(D^)wUb9Dm}|_~OTPAs=23cwO*w zuul=s2OR-hMOl{kG!EF5aUfsP7p^zj0{q^|{ng$WO!A&Do3z-o;7(*p62{|f3rhC` zQ@4Eh%Uk*dE}=iXj~j6A2aJ`LE-IXMxIS>L8#u?PWn<%KZya8Cl5v)2eDvoJBtL%j z*PmE_0P_61>CY@ny|%H{$|H=2fb;KnzVznAe?Cv}6#rgMA#nC@$7cPKxXUj;!Sd#X zrTxZamx%m$qOJHM^|@KH@azgTQP@S1cXe7xx2a=dos<9+FWs%LKC|66&5 z=W7-*F8d(&RLvQEw4^M2P&*IeI=7=k8?G*iHw&EdQ=dySuSVXEG%8>DAbt7Jr&%Q8 z(7);JxjN{h`jP#x7>7B2_da^+%9p+dR?W^0?ocsv@=X%cl%ZKADCC0%{;?fbz{}ALqA6I8I z$5F6FJZ-==Zwvotwf^IpUh<#q>kgqAPgwg*e5~$9I;HqzHZ2{W`R5<%`e@ZT{{oM5 zLodgt-RJu=cfHY-=UH(+;2a<4zUs?fy`=ww^#_3SdwId%^l?dVREq4oMgE3>^L-?b zXJhNTisG!KrQ{&K6a3r_f7N1NCmt7J2Gy%#zUQ*wr!GbuLhtY7d85qF!~B`|gG&eB-AFfy<012lRtmk$ z&ji0?xz6*|xKO|DRQmNC@JT0?LvDc>Cs^OwiOz-`6T(ed!hT-Y9XsVlH?5tdg}evx z;dR}``pQG%oF#bi{1CuIJr8;wn%;h3yo49eSHN3h`=b)CC&=;62F~T9 zKm1!$URMy-h<2~WI~Q_p@5p#{y@vcx1zv>o#~VXV##-04Y!v0PV$}0Dwe}MK9ZN*~ z7=NNg%6st=&i-Y9_rs~hZRB-bj*kQRZ~pj0tsEa-*Ug6f$F1J+a(p7?i|ZU0ljCSB zjtk+uuFLvIO`LjHE}sI(o0bYcKIr%8Bl3DoDz5YR@kF41S0l=g+A+7EOz3fdKlxx> zb#*-^5^wM_z#FJ9KP*9tR~D{w|FtF5)+?{;<|y_&{l~zGNs@dXa2_8#W#cEw>$+?& zxA!9OryN?rVt@~yz|=k+mHJnii}6p?ySp&pFBSB zbEi2^x?J3U2uYE@Tj_`FkS7k6JHH3WdS1UgGl}&O?gO9S16(??#zQ=xAv^%wnI-zO zyPsyXmgXn=5O5Rr-@nqd=>{IZsh+Cyp+fNM{aqL|up>w*&Z<8I(RkyAocUc5A0GSc zIA@=TPvcEGuG2Zio!`IYzI=7pRYNxJOzTEC#XSpr9>+QU-+yxABU!i57q9UtanF(R zBR^DJ6Xk2`6V zMgO_ToZ#U5LDEGB@$(L1Jbg##^&-F4f1hv3>luPA_&%+eZ@It=Al*`-Tk*VA=JR*z zcKpt7KKKV5qetpZrS}t{_7p%|dELH>%VjTXDQ;Veq@9HP~W$I(1rbw5Aq|kOldpwBtK%=%jLS|#p>z*i@m9S z5tr>xj=TQ9*qaXis;aBLiDhqkmD2WRf=_-?+;ea)$DOX5a6M1r(>}p=`0GN-a-4F# z*CTL+l03&UT>p)xl_ljLj$71oF>kK0Ti1MG)O!b14w{ao{c=hAhAXz%X z^+KNtoX#mO9;KWMtC!RpD(4)Xs0Rro5I(q^UrIdQKUO)1jthPk@=3Y*=+CjrSoOEvTf6;t zlouUTUaCA@C%ZGCCzDhBu1Ge{*#_d1-9af|YM(xQcVDfcPo6& zS`i21%QcFBzmD>vgZMV^ok(rq4`uywp66VSL0y^ zfAzi|=S|jVz8ViV_;pg;6JtEbHmLFNgWs>u!f(~**i^67c#s8DuL=>D5ahW%Xx0n= z)OuyXb&{v{!0k1!otUq@x@_(*aWUpSyq?VSp2V3)yTqFJINFMSFjPmI>FCtwPjc=dtFLgz2H;SDDDBA%k`74Yj8az z@oCf50`Gjc|+0UlQf zeZ2nKw!V=X8LQ~N%?A8_5(pnV9~``I+EXd*>3`}M z{2t*C*ZXb{b@6EJgbKW1m%!c7^Y=?r7VtU{wNodq``8Y=Ke~E{sk7c5QB(Yf_^waH zzLX*O6@XmFFK(^UWWK_&k*V&Wk4W zcPvHxT=03nJ3IK>^ZuF7a~wMWp?DVU5%J=6t=&E9Z{|8eco2MEm+W?D z?Ln&q1N;!yQ9fp`hmd?@^3`PbtUo6GBJR^Yr2)$P}uGxEBc9XR(Jms15JiCoEP$3AG4;ksj$3!K_|xjz_~u|oNNBOr*rrQ z;MySY3&Lg1yhV>(dwOfP!NBzn><`KQl{4SCCi$=RVSh)q&++=LR!gmqZ|D52n?!ur zzEM~HxqEcO^iho4fwO(x?;V)2y4=75;93{(OLQT8Or5FyWc0$?@6!KNK8^#Te(}2V zUEAj4Y+txO8N879Bjs`QtM?r{xtvHB9mLN^JT%}3k@k8&X)u?YV2k`+;1_~tcyf_W zUe{FHqxB;Zk1wi!dq7>+r2N(PXa|4X+czz--ZN9%qZ|A^y$;_aH42>)$J2@m(vT8DHVwlnI!xDfZnMQK}W zsq=2qU!?Q{9!Z~kU(Dkbx3@K(!5_z=AENlE?~CR_&rjM%cnc~rIdagrspd-njZ@i> zD@4lqS~m;-xep>fjZ_f4%4IF)Z6@HF7uKR4SGI&T6Grct{zW-b=vR1W0QA@|wgNp%xk z%oHi{Q#&GlxNpk@|HOyyJ|1H~17k*q()=9o2Tz@|hMx;?E~MX~@C(2{TKG=c82cF* zQ^9xQ{>}1z*z8fY5P6k&#n5^rj*j^Bkj@B zsr0-y8+@Wt`KCIBKHh)Ksy%y6>lKO!F9JURe>y)BdM;kVEn9?ty#L49SL#mHNq8D? z9#_&Dz1%`C;pxD+U)Q!M`PV+i5bY4P5`!#hF@<$=x>x+>)>OSykEymNH7x>S>cRjlCf$r6J z?gXw6_{IC;tlzfv%7Z#Dp+bM)1tEVN^2Zjz7)S&i<8Q>pm-*Q%pi*qi~ul9#o;4jtpkB_m>s3Ak? ze{#XE_*(waa`tHb4uxL?e)YvUYhvs(YDiW3!_*uRm+3FI`i8%6*>&)S&i>%CUxH~KVuPFqDd(Gwb2Q(G zHkyY7ah)!Z|LSuTehx=CeaET!O!&{wu~~Z(|CZU|hs4oU^9c{vKVt!KevZofdW?9isEz6)@iV~Z`(D!y5vO2W zfkrJqinCX#H)-I*KApXfs0Y07NWSi*hcG%QJ{EkZ$?<#c*|sZx8TiH%z~i!^kKcQ& z@|0&y>)O5uJuDxW3!LA3EV`!a{7}1kpRoP{;Mb;f?@HHRsz0K-{lIULkH|^hv{U%U z@n5TN)ph!PPj2S?Q-O2*+i(9_uWz1JjrBW#m!k{equMjA`Yhbo<~jPG+J6Rcjwi?e z=MN_CP~#uAN1q9MGa=XP>EZWt+zHRYb)LU&$*uNzyp?hj`%2Ul|7tk3;yn7h`Y!H4 zV&#Obx8*5k}2dw5?7C-6BZ>`$;?g!8@<8Ni$D zZulE`y=OqFeGRg4oxiJ3p7LnrWUH`%S&kG-MCQKLosQ-#go4#lHafQ|a%Dz<=f+qqjn7dSo41?eB;}<5dRQZE8@& zk@q!7$2pe?@u_{eab3uVpV#4ij%>V7V);hQQ@uND-sJX8Tsp#bN4;MXfW9^BpB(&O z&q0dc{{Y{Uf9*u9=OBLc>->D%yjS=|`G@O;j^7XA-;>#%{Q1#RzbC_dtUp$nU2%{6 z`$S&gTrXPxIH$e*`$T@=JkMD6bF;bp`$SYPgTVPd=F@tfPV_r7bWpkSdniSCuO=V- zlM65P<=>AGY{6IKuh}R39r;16!-iC5ij?%L@Aufi@3yM^5u+uV&(EPa{x0xeAAF{< z$yECN8=4n!{N;K>^~?@Ge30jHKZtXgPxUMh*U2KPH~jsm>rmaWw+4^ z9?u^v`$b&d{@!OYSflwGh3^3W-!I-TYm9Dx#{6$_KQ~#-6FlG#Dl_WKa9BzmG~Wm+ z^NnoqiAeRriSKir0nvV%eU(w__fCtz=kIg>{PV#dbas&q$y+`b{&BrK?KPD8JyZTZ zHx0axucgf8=f_kp)cB@@*J#JCqp_YFtMT=KpZM6-qFB$3)%a$E|4{Jwjabi()%fOt zKUnv``b6P&@n5QUYJ3Td+)p5GrY}T%(vT7!u4h`ObWZ$S54gSv+gk;*+-)Poz`QpNn-QUXR$^<@DQeUO^^21A2Kqp+c2At>yKo zOyInpv#>+aLU}zZ8#u4$oE&v(nNHH53!MF*UFSyeIt1lkydDbP7hSL1HAwQTpZn32 zuO8SX>rXu(;==K3{@wiUdP&{{+<|n{TQ_eRfm46uK)xBkdA+n^kH88Ocp4nUx4bRZ zOH(123AwggPEAd4GgG9*SJww}z+W-oxm$^@Xue5VUo8MXrG7V0k~5mGt|wS>MLfRq zzSp1Mt7fT)zsmi-1N`Rgzd9G={pzUoRS)=U+po6pJW1BCt|w%JAIy99dv(4<_NeO# zdEnpmcYaUlj>GjiUX!o%ucohrzhnc|CthFm;deul7c9G^^$80JPY0jd!>QBFKZ}=e z4{&Y|nHio@ItkAL&h4R7kIU!v5}pH`+e71T4j(c|cph-J&(dh?mqrOM0?zgw%OCu$ zNy05(3xC$CqIvx@0Do;Kl2! zSK~xXAN;h%>eIctMDATFzD}%vvVV0dZrClwPs{78*B~DpJL3AtYyWJ8xM zKP}((we90y0w$=jn75@X{2ZJ&p8m&uTrXt4 z1$Y|L0;J_$(2d}FBJ+z-UU^6@-w6BW#SJoZy^;Aj3f}>KJ?k4|xgIf};*|xy2fR@; z9PgDueV}-#{bx3Kf!``#DeGlTA|<}sf98TezsvN&Deh>#+J6>--=S+ygV`0$SNqS@ zZ$&%?Jzp@hoHLrQ_MhqCpD=#zFK>_LJCy!26a2a-KKP=7Et;RItjFen|BbaM$ot)~ z6vapFKMTOW`u-!eV(ojU_MetR!rw-}ZX6nG-#fMcq`awLO+&xqfV>AO;WU5pN#|5A z{MbJx?-wyYI$1I0b-oV_<2q*xah>nK4jv4ziDAM_^7*U}_g}kCR<0`Fe`&rGesDiE zE$>oezW)lx$;iJCX$3FzsmSk*>{edB4f5EJvoF=rxu6tDm|uMV$?*$7u9v0gky!70IDzLQ?Upd}kRe?tr21n1zI1&Ucy9hL zMhWNfI2aK9@t~?V!;AMN^3G&&-3dL%C+I6_GfHr-kF2Moac!?S2{)Ay@;=DtZ9RW3 zUcv*o&hyY#wf-2WlkgDmEbOD+Y02#G^b%eOoX6cWHy%1;kZ?C}^A92pFBBf_ZUj#8 z=K5WL@yG_=-nnHyH6c#ITQN_vL7x-6r^e^o5@N(N{Z~=1n)F?AGFCkOkY7G&bVE6w z>~F>rAwR3&cz@a7e8{oCIXxhuW2l;PDH~KY}zqvn)`}*fz4%U|a4MC3mZE&*JaM|Ag z@Is`oFMsh)EPov-!ann15f|<3s~uwb>xLd1c-?Ncxt1jP%k3d#6?&#@d++;L{&<%P zfBFPo`9$`|554Tqj^sZV$o_bN2aygbXtFMrKkjqFpM3C^_1L^UmOn1wnj^yA`H7bs zB}@L8Hw!!M?F63t$)@A+_LBC^{uUe(&kcKiyMI{`!zF``h#4@rkm( zZr}l=UwHDa#q!q)JcP8fv*k;%{IvluM4DpjS*eWVuk|P4C-*naAKP3|7C7|>>iB2} z|McHel2aVq6NpsqKX`m}fq&#)Lk)9UG+!Mbec=0+Zf;vHHJY!Ek3sMkRU1{gyd|2i zj*o@lf1NO;M+H;KIt)qDx)6_#n6^h0MxN7RJh2`X@#6JJC(dO)tw(0yIw=T`JKA7K z-0!DEG=`s_hPqe#@u!(hfa}xnKAHc#cz^%!h95Wa`;RnkH&cV%+Fm|DR**KgHAX zv+$SWG`Yg5lhS*=`ZVBt{~et5p^M)eCHZvVe1E**{Mkb$%yS6$0Oxt}CtiPx-+LqZ9N^qftb3=5k=Jd)c=3D39sgPM7RBIPyBQg$)=xYD|Ko}v&(C|) zb}jy<)7`!E8Mho0{`2$R6BBl}*`&G^N7=Y`o z4~p@G@9($v&g-gm6ROcr`J_Xh>&K2|qn5`@xM`~xM?B!o`fWx#orGuMdIos4w{Bjc zm+&0mTtAL|*6^bIerFzVt{;~^9#=+sf76f#JcRjp5za50Pd{mLMcgRG=s z<%EdOif8=V`Q>=X>rr}jr4@V;tr$56)3no9U;e~|@#&r{=X zl(m&^|D<2-FLJ@ZzO}-p6l*kJ)n5eu>!-(`Hk+gQs{YiIA|BPou4_$gg8LovfW{5A zKcef@PZgnGN{4(VQo`we*e{(^yS8l<`P3ys_;}-`e)T(i(f11dPyKKRd~c2zPk5bq zXqhYJcsw939mKb77CaaDg^=HQB{(zIxS+nTZapRJnf_MO^)xQX2kCd=dlUX1#0mcW z-#+B0aX~(aufE^z1^=I3KQy9oK|YADzTX}I-@B%228|2yLGiXL<3c|8#G`u4-;?nD z*_bD1Bxqei3*olY!e4IJ8BMxo#7npnIQRQwR=?kr?^{XU4V?S^W7i*eOE1a$fETyh z&%g5;O7PM{@pTq8I+kRp{AsXR_ke?ZHPNWmw zKUKtjGoRuU0N)E<_ttkO8eM`x`K$Fi0G_YhjyHLHWqlEQmHHh5f83$>ED3gImgraO zx8{uS_vl~l1&Pu1+o0BO8~8Oozj-jp8m(Wg-!Aa0jz7I6Il6uu)cWlMe{%B!Wy_RS zAL(b*`b`w7_h!U32>C*!gi}9bIxGAX{P4c$Sa-|(NsQn7Ke)S%_XDGHN&}zq3z>EY zfB#7BGVnFtf5!9dbnsgy*stj*6X_uPTuQt2DE0(@72_r6cmA&d9oZf#XEncE$p3wE zc|V?ubC%Q}tN9T|c4R}Y0IB6%Nn9vSHtC%BUS++^Tdm}MQObw$ILC0p#xAw`oGWgqtqFKkVDS^w7jv^8HmRaPF7y?{%abkEf)c z--mF3_xa&Le?l^*{gf z&CPYzh$25A<{0rR-HD&2a2Dy zK*WRZGybaOugLQ@!tKDhT|E5hp9{FY$?>6^$Bt_^Xu!~c{rV3d)P6L|Bm6!Y?)USdchZi( zZulO{i#);#=chAY7XI?OKyK$V_aPiqUV0mF?iXube5*f~E#Xe!ykGa*AJ(3zmE!3J z&hxXkb1D_ay99yceZYBs*s}kWVLY!QJP5l3;9dHr;l2b(KJ%<-FD{I`_l+JfR?fc= za(v&~yHb;@@_nfX?I0^#l-IOh_sr6HOYF-6&gK26dD*o%1V7^c6%jw4|BiTK{A8`Y zMBWXY{kyvK(vo-yw*mJdExWSrvwCldJh$fn@K-7i`PKlO`Zec=!fy6I1fG4%zS(^L zE3}Dm!wkF->F9TpUghr>$)8;8C&2b*SD)KM>n^d!{!8ihF=F;>205Oon_&-lKaFaB zRlbjBf4so&TRozWd>_y4!w)?bBx{GLdI^xoIB5^e|1_34{0noNtAa1ZK>3%o6_zI%^O!dXAp zrw<>Rn<(q|LyqgyJ++cr%KE*)gGfzBR&~=$`Z>P&z&qWWY~=SLsJ^(B`l9(w_&Ypd zdru?kRjm4A1utduy$ksLEsCcH?S|`1{|Dnb#zPO`Hqs%iWJ#nnEY+oU8t`BKTZ&y!{?Bn{7o-F3u-~Li_dz@cH zAY%XTB0gMSZeHCmNh{$_;9OtMq+eVfFX3Dt+~9SeJjtz-aF*x#uwsg*jV$kjTmb3m zGM7HrOY&UaA>copY2DlaoXXp$ly@O`FSHo)xcc4;`OE!-`48duGWUZve&2;~u757n zuNk?GTFLc~f0w`o`B&$R+{g7VEU(K~<_E*B-wkMRkbXbpINnc8nz3JQpF!Xp@0sOR z?~vP1K5%ZIGj6^xx>WlCt|=7$eb``lb&dn&ZwGD#-sQzwb@~0B2#)LAKHvJJ$7%UJ zFc)wx&tT2WLHr&Vl}G9~=pQk@d%?eCI5s!g%aIT%$Z>f+T-R}1 zE-yE5F0W_)edw56UOwPlUR9zW_@J;Y`_bV)}OIQ z%jGSXhZp5x{!_$Z|0mh=xgU}J4Iz#;@FtvZ>@O>ohm-pw;BCensGB0;UR-B?G@;h_ zm?hi~oc*bLA^nYVz{y_QzoqL>5d2E*&rd4v)|5J^d^9NkeDJQ%Yg@enc!Z~;|7Lrp zXeYj)mF%%y6Y=2w{io$Go{ZJMJHhiTow`---?@Idf#0t1@NZK8uJfgou3vd|cYe=K zkbMEjas8>bVtubT$-WS9u0QvF^;&J&{zBk9|4d!l^MGu>`MU6r{r`A=m3BHwzYRG1 zUu|foA7uZWz`4BEulS+4Whw;2dj)$531#k8@ zNzYW2%F~MZPd@O*W4aYpl5ow9(*B<4aVn#-gj<2LKjqe48eRoB*_(sk&EfIZ4t~=g z(qFT<*iw;F`Gqk5c7ZoPw`=vP;6-r!E=xA%ji06*{!^L{>WWOI>&M}C=SFcZ5qaq4 z@=tuj?}?NADFn{t|JSss^RyCf{!7Gz*HIqJS=Cvd&)R@<{dnQUxHCFQ-U*!R$Gj&` zOwvoZ8#v!jcC0^VgXEvy2b|+w>;1c4dA=K9|G>MoVc|xu7jk)U{Rx5Bq0d82_&!OF zmk;_1!Ryhi+KFl?57MX37pyl$e6I9~D}RrZHHnn?>U`1;{*Lo^`rd1g<~x=7h#UM* zE}Cmsw?*^)xUb{;8$b9dkGy!bhBcb+Rrn$BD^2_5(tYM=emd@tS-+-8`0F0HdX1u9 zL-oyt`%xQspS_X$dQA{19_spv3%ves`zF+ik-xgW;sw7$zg0bJmo_)D&ZMrd5QWxP zy;#o(K%ReBCm-iLeiNV8SBr3+&dIO5H^uyy-_xpBwoUVR0>cO4srbFGv|A!R=N8R< zUMJuPo{sCbrJ}vwy_V2cUyO&p-+HEWJNAH26k0b{ak@_HNm<}omI?VBNsiXfLehEI zPOYZ8@S_VU2p@9-y$Ze=R(2!(A1OcJJf18*Wu7dLC)U4(f83umYqq6(==Y4f;;6HHZSOPs~mk;9G z6}}66=j7#U=sCN55Z|iU?*re|>{tRlXO|CZANfkV3W85Ost?|pB7QtSPgtA0N1lJ1 z?+AanJ>0kA^FQSIw+%SAhu+DfUXbVCPT<@g?(A8YF3-Q+z_~p<_iv6vy1&r-fOC7e zaA?jGJU=J<1Hjq-KU{M%<@?bPaJK()nXh)q_iKf~+5V25MqH8a*UbM4|JnY73u-3u z{Tk(O1J3q;G3%|5rSEq1PT<^L>tF8ubs3*1C6ado=kY!7f!y_FOK@#bZBagTwL<2| zX4BC@t9~(Z`4vnkU4GBhZ?RP>A8kfmf%9e&7gyi6x}d3U0L$}tfE>SO(-KyfD*wB} zf5uNwi+@VipI1-luMhir=Dob-&x4Ksf_|+nRp1SQw`{+m+8pnS$RiT+zi?z}`$zQ{ zA>W^B{q+U@0OZs1pV_}Ccm1!dzo>!0n*bm9_~gH4HD48ZBa`%Ve7O7*`s_+$`@`+Y z5Q2Y&NFB9>ziaAkAHnsQ@}h(I0q{a7H?wBSpLum#`E@k43{zlm;J zfa|%;cYIT2%-Ej-J-pl+#*ui{1_?;f?wu{?=%nyLi_J^21>bLi}T`-^G=L268 zC;Z&sZTf{2)K7|sIv&`->(bMHlYiaDBZRqXeJ-@IORRD#td?g8Z&Otz|Mmv7H_Nq zwWajtL2uI6$=l{%FaIg)WxF_K`-YBmj~^GqKATR&?eab6th=YJj`UOHCl?*3{9JC3 z$3193*uE~~#}zA-{q;a!;CiNc&A~{qIPR0AP_+JR#DnLl7K8Bj?0HvCai;)Z35sNYuknn#5F%r64pxbWbF&XzE{*A_BYie;&U!% z_6O8&tNbFr;HTpI#dPqiw;9sR67E!GKK0L<&VtY1A!dTF2_ND9Lgxj}-+iu`GP@IZ z&S6}i2R^rhvLBvKi7O)Mh`hcCc$P=_?K-jLj8VcZ3BsQs?*ERRx>>^{;c3A6zH-P1 z^_C?_csg*N=Z;+QZmUEI54<4imj}F-{!4td zJ?DU5kXfcdnLK8Sl=y0UE&#tlpY8R_=9VrG;;Zf1k|^Ty_H(yQDLK)6wLLq)U$E-R z8FO|tUv1AG@Z-zRDpxKmnyMQa~}9*2luaE!4u6_+p{T2_`C0S zPsfTG(R{T%r-6TJ*TxN%(xdrmd(Hs=f^l`7%8qEh+Mct(PmilPs7hKiUv1C1;13At z?y;ms^VRlT1pefv{a&wXiRP>AIW<|t=d-6yR<33$&8PJ&ZqIT%r**m@0V}hSk;a1r>LK?1LynY_Z~ewoA09tcLC@7$E zpL~k%lOpen`B>znM7*%*#`a>mKW-zgvVL=ApI`zd7O2z{%b$AFk5A|&~I1xKJZsJdbUNm@Hi_Uq~EI8 z9|V8o{_lI1m&xJ(X`HoU9OZUa2tH9G^%Lu5{65I%Bg)Rx`Uw@d-7Mn6?d!8aRSV+% z5jZ060?zHrx9j$AItljz=k`@&@^cUBCEO33+t;(LAImmKcn~ zoZIhv4bxVZk#Ik7o=03vnLn83!*qnpr+B@rE!KnDRDSQ?FGei60$lI1i0^yY|EqV; zuawHCc)hGW3nqN@5TEy_^@8Z@@>a9OOoYzJ?tsS@2arl)yWA@KF;>>df3yz z*K}X?e9E=g=dpd6SkGhq71opq$@+OctRv*#TRy$EGk5(omS_LCe7tvl*eA>Ldf79O zZ}iHLtB>xSmBI2X$Ngj7<-HE@^N(;1$kIf(BC-;dPI`fHzln(H}B5Z?u!o#nuPO+R*<(a%hg65p!uL*TDzS?L#U z2P{SWe6FvM(^M3Gx7yLSF1HKjQ~wYI-v(Z%>GSub_)GFv#}5~HO|IS;X7;hB623Zq zc)@S}!O7G7-UmyOz3TW80RK$c;f3n^AH-M3k9_butlHtO;9|`s_5_vw)Lco#qeYM0 z=PNp+`F@3O2mh~TjkZ>@NAtbl^Z4NgU$?*Pk;=Acz6*RFKm6b?c&lOgD%NPeUEzno zZ$0o;pT!)_w<`8)Dhq$VNPRw^_oikkn%Al02Vs$M1^uoK@-C!=)B2i6IuDmi@jkBU zcwdz7EAJdBs2E2=(n0#|%D9y+=?m9Oou!+&f8_V-+kE#%YgR$^pm<+_|0%!l?`1&0 zrHY8h{_}raM3)k2_vtG|elDyR6um9JH~4PPFL_B;&RL|Cf11M2fZn(>jgKV9C>M*u z&jNq%r-j|hlvW>(fB1KmfafATI=9cMvfvS3gzG%6{5xd9D=Ek~R(vcL;rB~QzpY5m4xT!i%bn`Knm@^s-}$h^4mn2~ ztTW)8Z6H4R?ZI^+A8%Ce$1Kl_^}Lg=>ITlAxO7l^$a=7J9CAwQGpPC;CNV!B9@nRP zvQSg}m;6%o5lDU&K(DEqhztLIUmDI;znr*E@>HJuJF?t=c`olgz%mg(DwX!bS6W_| zqu{T6VzvF$B9LOgF>5k8Ts;{$_aOpqdbAQF{APf9D zU4O5kR~jVod0!J#f~fzw;Me%2(gcHYe@=0CDeG-T;8XtOf6?92{&MCEeM?J%?j6&Pq^Hu9q_tn#wk(%^1*is)Z7ujFZ&+U@=Ht>gE&{UxP_*A~SZsr32=QpSHjkO=2 zS810%@DX2qXjf@_(+;hDBQ9LNjOT;T@v}^yHbIN}NbQc}&-c%@AFzENmtG=owF>{a zeT~2EcW5Qt4xHP~^_puJ#{;K&sK(O;{!^PL-J^4qjt|+R0q#ZGW92*3q;{^;3@Kfo z9v)P!r(B<`iak9X9e$VXEmZI!ja%-P?N!UuTvPbpv-jAKV%ZylJ{x#9ZjG5O*{gTq zI>*22+RwUkzd`;6cpnA4Px$HR{+r@mBK}mr__?QdzL-CF7l`zY1MPEkg@VU_iOKJ>IcTJfCD zU4mr=QZ#q$HFOj!G-i|b9^ZV`P_nBR|Zc7w)Tz}>tbe!e)YM97yP5o zeYrcu8O>McwE^&JjQ+Nd*F-d#^TF%p_})=2+z-(aX^&{n=DNbK503t|vb==b zaGl4Sz5BD?tRUe|;M^aE+Mm5p5qKmXc<#>QksJKu!)u(Zgnn6ABg#|lKYiezeExxf zl~YUipQK;yzk=X5o6*o*#S+a|$D=~<7vJ1JU41S~^J^ZDN{?$gO%UUZwVsF@&l8+D zm-#eL$iQ`uJMZ&ba747X$C~EVj<n9h_C!}&Ip1)^9Zz|+ox^K$aSn~=lmz?Rs zk96=;D$cDz^9uPOd(?dlGr^yI@yogYwa;%B;+F&d;z?K5#F|(5m3c)0_+&>o-rB;C zM1RHa6;+&*{Kd{c5+e6nk#>T8!??WmJY4Rfc(hNlKP^?nF&!!I|bh>}~1! zEyu?Lxe31{=IE7nPx)Jn==Z_voZ4)VypL}lu5)=`?6bE>-p7~sA?Ev$1@r#t&-Rmk zUKi&5WzM$#g)#-eGug)X%5nh0OgLxdY z)T+H!n^A&u{pRNkZ5!?w8z;$ULvJq9`IV}L;w8KQ*Et?L4$Pe|=Wl8t?B{r_`pCUm zFUh9@=YDO}x{+@fBs>%P9pJTibHh%fglFJ7_nW7dZhgiCJRHyB`ymVTWP<ED+3sdZs~#rp_P`=w)2yh~^xd44{T zS6f-^@r=VvB8Lnak4!0ni>hay_3IO5HI1WxX$ySE0Yt( z>LlC&oa1-wL=&H0!ZUz#{kil?y$Q1YxyU~gym9-NzHF4_vvHm4uP(du36q590_Xa5 zYp$(Q0&uy0r6QjK@OQm&wOJzK#8D@{TAro{L|m$^dhV^H3}%Xy_-cJj1Ha*tl|Sr_v5*2Q3b(!{+(m5>w?Ah7&DT@ zbzU#XLq0E!T=0!Pz?PKoRey`Xe{y$IjlmzySN%{~ylYJie*odmm5t04<5+bT9I0|NFn3Xj21p z(T~qboWBKtf3%h@k@ItwDtP*f^S2Q2t^RnRf2}Mc%k4ML-!j@N`{yR~_1Csm#2e>t zcHldkJ{fdXMnyc=>o|YQ1wOHB>Th+-(erkhhjad>&#Ps=WUtolwWcV?phWfZDvG%2Ijw6kn03~ z&&Iv?@%$v&WL?_bPLHEZ|K~+|dH`u+r4v=T&M0wjtp5;j zS9PtCd%5=$W%b`t*+048ciESFKT%fyz;Avz*!ptsC(7y{_%#h5FNyVjg7vSr6Y1{) zsMmb(v%d@AUdKzjDn>s19&frq&6BP%%^NG&Gh>=w<2ttfanR!|H!8dN9q~t&);RjX z!fm;v+d$`c#M>_KwdlSzaqm*T6ZFUdz;Nb>!T0?+XGebIIXco`fUfHq{+;7QH}dya zzU_PVqv8C7LgYVIV|kh>JTAy3{dRgsWe2~r90acA;ExB!0jJOk?|ELuJMkglH+2|n zi;sclIuYe&WGTN4uJ_Wv2?o6M+r?|xHTr?= zRob<&-u=V}%|FCyr^b3O2L9ihS6>sWof_*s{U+tF=jJx+CGAwdq+VI?dc8_J%|$)f zz|VG?gL@qx8UK(k^2HC_H<0m!^7G<^^-qyU;>}Y-wL zCVGb;$J|-j&EK=O;-2LRUi7vhU+zUOi{X1d{&&>)B=pGdzXD&B9IZd)vfmIquW&iZ z1zI`M{(~3Q`+2^H@N55V~S>zYJLYdL!g`(vp8|CHwtK_c?{BbJQyvHa{%8JZK z|EK(xg_PgnaN%CpP5kFZzVJ)EXR$x%t>$%~q&K{YJYjmGzh|@^^&c9uQF!GNe$Tgx z&h~w%>t=obPm<|or60f3vA6Eu|8gEG{F&cH^S9~wMjfsEBn$X$NdMcE_&|~>K2m-$ z>~VrVV#%w+lQp^@bT{aY?tU$mXD`F$T%atb)NRV7hetzMC^F=>mVxuU7A-O+xn|-|?{8H`guaiGc1WmhT1bmiU1;&`)~#>?acz zv>6_kt`yYE4}pJS!OpkiHM;p0Ww#mh8+vYU!TGhcuK>P>#yGM9zk2hybF@?Urv-RB zaDR`oeWcqPKsmXfzp{MhO}fABpyz{L@1;T~+nu!EtUIIQz7ROkLG0!4i&!D&V5_4Y z^!h3Vp7Lv4+E+yR;TXBVvjR-3!?=m}j~FGN)g3)z^g|=`AXMd+oqx`x|{_ndRVR@7Vcss%7p{yvN0d%xW#P8>(EBDYMh zAmm@Ops9E30Q(RDiC*TeO5bo9k?Y)t^C?>BNmkI=POo+R{i7a#cF@i6ci*)GIZcT0 z`%tb6xGx(toKJsC`CNbFcZWOAy_4Y|;dk7o`ak+*$)WST=ois10J)UEame*!H2G!i zF9h7a^CN>CTZG@-Ejs=m9{p1(_XP^w3qC7w541o3DfgWUJv2qNTiSo^dppbaDGJ>V zJ{Qt~rrLw_{iq(u_kiAHV(R@oGcNoY@Shj-7XNNMfaV+V598en|L@#%-l5k|2zGm^(Cn|r>G8q(HFsBb-2S+I zsU9CzqSk+B)xrKmjDv5_`|Z^@wB@k>%f`pdx=PM({-=lKTK$m3PEoxaOpb=`H7YY-Hv=0?3i2db{{=HT%gmwtM^^%rrYNMo#WTvFC}zL(d_fO zm3>~|>O5YQ$=_ATG9{X`2Z9bg15AMrEy_78>s$1R*e%ZwTnFVi6$1Xxi!CcNJ_IY5 z#IXl*Ej^XLE^c$4(c5VN?aTpsLWh3CICjW9+c<71xe2Bsw96du+47*;G_Jldum7R(@nQ4z4<))=nD_LBm3T1ekSOQ(-h}7ef4#&AmlrM zTe*AuPOd|VeU!`c58BrJ#C1xc=YTH{>6zK}C#9f#nTO@{Q1i=N`T@9xU;3t+E3Vt8 z6n0m5Gw?y+3$9t2RLQFB;$M+(oadQ(D}Qtub>Gy=71!;{_F218Z<)Xc-hBS`vJM&r zNZjTkZcBL{0C@N}-h4{cAN%evht|0;cwUuAR}uD4yd8A*&4cg$vH5fVd-xObdqHR4 z`*v`pb6i}~0@BT=m3+3@dX{IaS8gBQ8}uYQ=!~!1tJhkm$5-ZU${(!XwTtJ~Vf{)w zN(Y_w}05d@y|@B-kItF~DgYyH9pJnJV2 z{3j25a!aiB3)YX`PNm-RSWmYr`!kV>9nwG9wfivd1=b%^j@2V4PM9)!0>7jq+>v%& zHb2dUoQCTfR=qxH{7|7wTxM=j^_GeKqI^%`J@eTk zW0RZ_SlJ)J^Zi*VaNI}mfY;d|IR>8ls?CsZy+iqB*1Va+QXFNXBmaneFXZx^TQ=}7 zl$&s-3Af`!OE1+wb6yt{`i%|;OQ#oOr)eZNoPB={RR|AiIdAQJ0TyEevCHgH|9{&23@rEvTkj*qhMmoT1k zfq$~$3zPVJ;X2+JPhQ}Uy?JeVWqWjeMC2RdsR;Pr>b};XN_gDR>re2;crxFq{Nd|f z^n0o`2Hp@)S-`jG_tdVm@VH@=Z;U4w@I_q`cULvUlgu|5PtkJ1>#C^7eDHI=5x~8U zm-$99^2L`j-tv4M*9})a^;ARhMAjK@R&iRE=TLqiKhM{Zzy0y2J}bk9<2>8Izu~`* zPqQASd?)0&kxsmS&t|^w2sgucj$^_TnLirjNxrNz+Q46c)Q>cXlsXAs{18IE+>0Is zJyn0hdCB;E*2Yg}v)2S^>Fapo`+Yy~HNM_fHP$%h>8SMaqMQ=o z3u`q>jWv$hpH}tgds3yA0m>gs2hV6D5CA2K{=r4KA`|6zH_ z#`?_arJlpurLH)i?4Tr-3f@?sPRMJ0>+VH77eOw;8|yO<_+M5nUu||0SuWpLpMKzf z+SmG6r5O4c>$3#-zs7VpUD;MqzOg)mafAgx=IY7x;$NCx0mCUX1ed4D!9e z*BJIzeL44H#OE0BMZkZSRdTp`W<`7^@D8NrY-R7yBRUMJVX25uH^|QdKGgZ>)|%-R z@kV=Hz%T8z{J5;`>-tN4njNZMnV%1Q7;2JuGCNc}GEPp{f5KGRCsaibQJ=S!oDsLC zJXA%ao9|Ngai4dgyXo#!jcx^<`%iZa>OCS&quW8}bJ=Tq2HaRxqq{)&!B3NJUS+GM z(LJDhF+LyMKfGJIM)!iw{i_{n-*u$AMh}3_`NhZM-)UV#qlZA}xV@vW!|ydUy7_Kp zKj$|ipL9G~OQTys=lrH#oi^XpE~m$5^;iDiIjH(!siPUQyM0(K`Q~EyKh6by?xR`O zZvHKY@BQCg(mkMaA5GVkf~Vg+bYdjv@m|ocm5lJ^$ep}q;^znL^1t*)-T~3&522V=L`9p^^O+9)3CL8$U%=ak!S-yAwJJXlUT04;Pt)MrSjPNyMwrAtC z&C_0$|E2t*fzjokIdcA&iJN!vce&$S;HUkMyfOWq7guyy2L3pYq5QVbG{0j+i?xw= zV-fp6Zz>Go>+~IUZhh}?wN~=K&>e%L%fGQ*&u{OpvUm>YaUnzbkM&-@e0%m66G%4? zjke!@e8SnRL(K{)-wJwj$p~M!ZL^%4vE%B0ux8r-s?4O1`IPaOnV7Ywqn};j=`#SP#Cuwxr&vOU2&%UKF!C%gA2Os;l zu5YF%CTesm=q{ws_51wqWKDhudV4^3f7`hzrMO(a2Xrs!*6t^dn>GJgK@WhwZBy0N zm9+W`A)o!{;MSFYudLBo|1QWmKgaZjUO(0m$}cQG@7dZuy?i_9?0;_xW-hIy=|}ki z$Zz~X;J98t9`Ji;UtnQ3-F`3V?7ssw>VIk0{6qO>@b4S8XQy6&A@I9Ek55kfTKB)% zsqAC_|F!>?yHd3Jv4YP2|NPYV7n(JC0P^j?-Mg^mhDw@#E|w4aiz_~Qx3caZ&^@5P z>HFDL1@$A(0RgmM&L_RVW&JsITq@+KXi@7=b^|^D{M?U*)K7z6IzE8@F%R?2Qs8%W z=$u*=cItRL@YKh8ukv5U$j|Pn<|k665&bd#5T6bFq-tN>%yFJvk^TgD4{)Qp_j&y) zU%5Qv{J0P}|Jcudu2Vos<@h|q{HzH0&yM}^T}EE?d`tArG2qSjDf_lPXdheGT@jxN zyaQ<#@WaPG_)@)`iuiPcd>8PC=FDGP-&qlFoG<1Bf9}8ge{A5Wh|e>~4*>toGyAV; zXsd|NG2lyqzjprStgACC;xmDFAhnKE{#o62-N(2+Szt$9um*+a;{5T8=k4xd-TgSY&5d0yeLYL<{(x=Bx3C>+b)UZrG$=#6sz@b8_Dik`>+JnXRoDO)ay`#i{FKl5&r(;MT${*g=K z(q)kE1AgScFV2Zqu(H1*F9-A>(uO5%*ChZUelyx5Bw0^%0B;(t{6iiK?rD?YWj!$q z`EoCQx5H0d|Ic_s*{$f|bywVH*wuPT-|7#)D(lds=R+R*<2iF4osFD|qpHo*_Q{nmns1 zp-N$*;-?;rvvW9FpTC0qj4{eTkKa4q%Qz4} z+mX+BdhOp(?F95&LU)1A^Yw9UZ#k>)U-E#?^V2W*wsq#YDdG2m&hx2T*Pc9`tjQ06 z?p~z&-`s=uwB-JwSoVg1Z`-uT#Bg(tx}@HX{uO|<=OXyQJXZN36W^Q2!o6Ns63-6g z3%|rc@mi%H-|KXq)31BdO}{)Z^hi63AxF-`NT;MD$O}1fBEnk^#LO`u-XR=pV#dZJmZ>p zKkyliXLL*s_wzZ9mB_5Rv}{Qnw^9;w$y0rF|jpZod_($DYsL1+6dzV6eR`uUw=(0P8xpK@CsH|9!x zo5m~sbKg?+G5xue9{Twm3+Q~VYyI5+{?_+9*+6GJta#qnk^5mpz7urDL$Q0mh5MO= z?gpLxM$!veC(MX9X}89BDFA+s`<@<^D#lCMc_8}B5B#s`xgS@q7%yf0An_%@Kb^O% zpi0GfNjAodWrFhG`~MwkXWR!N_0D*Sj=S*u3iaXuKgTpT?sdHMBl*aec#8N9^HlEl zh#z_Fz2uQNP4B1rf94e#_&HA{|HPfwyiRObexkc`H2=~q_eS>Ou>7ov%5K)1Z&E>z zxES+P%FhOV!)uEVvHucTa)~_|pywiO-@j^rJ`q0}?GZldk4s^f7kuOi;GQ-KUi?^$ ze8nIBKH_?1XE2~r?r&+ZdT>9sGr`Iw{R`)j#9MNdA3`mb?O?l8XoY9IP_6^`-1{c{ z!FEWz)LSO%jq_$V@Pd(g$sDTmG~J}$*H<0CJcIp(v=^g(EH{=t;`bormms}m>@8zy zhtMq#Df`%dpY3(#{e*Bkf<9$*w*QuOufLRlb{Xc6_XpMcWsY~No@w>#)VaOR3cvU> z_h;;LTA}(MuJ5&LKA~x%TTtbf;JL3W->u{pK)-i4_Pj3E`*1htL8M&&E7?7IMRHEL zZ23?8XWTbynxyPM+cJJginAi#xNkNS_>Je6h2P0U;A@aJ>e*WvRNd8B+B$}a}a-=JHL{#<2j59yPY{WB-tRQ+<#RcsHL zz)#;-^^aK3RmS$<1pY|fb|d7uO24GtvpwkTSlYc0@tOyIwtGMBb-c9uBIJvFiOc+D zYCc{Q1x{VL?%epNcgzC4?ES4LN8t{)?&e8EeTpBmrYOHyJFEEpDeLHNey2;~Gy`-O z__J~UZOO#Dl5HpyiQt2qRJ$%gnhX5+es{M@$*eeU@d3wi%M1KhH5Q&TTPos>@{53f zw&(L{G4{o$80DKER`!0eZtLH&FJAYr^ji+Yc#{RZm>Bj~qSvDA3Z@V?w=5UdqL;=^*{5D|IPg=LJzP!%v%>ef8%<#KcR;}XFs*O*H;g6KZMZD zQ)8=UV285?&5Z7!1aIumih%!OO#K?wEEVxa`Q}HJKbq~EY?I$< z*ZaR%^0R>d;?up6-)YzJGOii>OR-G)Q5X6t7x?p$3OziI#rw2-saLL7XFQ?WXWZ$* zkFhL~mt*Lciw*pI4j_N`x@pJC`QsB!hUb8{p4%}>bdgKSw@p`mVO;GWHljE#>>s(r zFI=ytd?)Z9e*4zeSkD0#(A`Mut*uwcv0eOTv`3W_UhxCohm<@)+|wq(%X}b&e7P4t z^LW!;9j?~P7QFb){+RNc3+b}g zSNZ7=q30u?e$8$$$fU2Q6@t$7wDF6cS);F~6;b}HDlY0SZ_tP9X|ePz1%7PyfZrpB zZA4LA;&-Eege3DYEBG=VSN3o{%#M5AcJaFt`NA)D`b(64T-Q6hXMPFo4C|TVY@y~~ zo@>>7pWkiTdDoY9=HS`m>1^9UZB+vgbLjyOsby=E1LCpufl^ z^7&rC0lh6Vl-+lAYv_sf-6o&mdCmd6$Q1jXzen5Ob*&vD^~r4#>1)aZWd^MtaaS%0`7hgrWt;9u)d zd19>dQpWlmv)hhe8fe3;TH8=!RO{> zM-Jb(pme)K=+YhwW5|(pV&)H=Rrf*mC$dgl0{o89b-!@EK;$rA*C!k|iKVSnTw0z~ z_BXoes>uWu(b3tcZKJ$3Hrx-VSJ9f5J?LQy* zzF+tI_j2pR{Qg!U@YDYI<(tc`6B8c-eod=7$1k@|Yz8jlDdm?5Ymbdh2|u?+`!D={ z2JOBGezyb9`r~>q{cFt6*YHvwTqpJ+fBCzw)YR)EfPC7Mv$4-Gu3t%gg+S-H)VuG; z4fS;%^GszA*NGd}>s*KHQ^Icry%68w>wZt*jJ{562c7XSqgl~xy&rLrf4YjRecl&( zu^$lm9?%&NHS_DA(btK+ptGMD+vly>vDS$hF9F~`nR@E?%dHdBUm@V%aXwM!a_hvz zXFRR^bv9x6PnTOKX1v&euQ~SVDY4dx883PqNk5W{ddmer`w=hhb-eT=e&kC$$-JiE zM&)nf_&r>q%lDT|&nP>x%?ihNqr@{6Jg;y$$rkWQp0roKFXlXt{p~An-PqbFL-fk% zAFY>5lPB+~tqIX|)_Y;vHO=DEl_oNN7|Sh$oGHEP+`;~jdP{$2ELZ8DXvzm)F;eH_K?RfuHkm@^5eI*jmmXpJ@AEv_D?%`{8KX zCFKVokA6D&&iQ=ZPn?HSehB!4hHqXn`bp$@K{wA*_Ir}1-$S2>AC30Vj~?)4fsZ`d zxTj5m7eD48U+%-@#(Oua{=SN2gs*z_ZtUNq$Ee%ne~B|6@QgF|XaCJPlcCENy!bua z;P;?bp2QF5?Ucv)^!4MXlzk^lWXUCV8|6v9v{REu`N@Km^I!+=b=|~n7xIN){9Sxh z)o~it&lLHN|5Uk*ubGX_tM&7HR`A)8&i>%;iTe6o0Oh+tuX{(y z

Mbyomi?&^@4k^^@Slx7_(hC!O%?R9KBxTl;k#Q0rCKOirLpwM2L8zWR)5TOn z}sHUB0BLaKh8`2Ez6lYaY%{j&Ja3x4`{%Tx6ebpNn@nNff3>oj)h z_T^*VMgOdSIIUBh#T2b)q05?xOcm@ zypZHp{1X2~Pb>RE^b>Hij?X&Gbx4Jd^z+Ha_UHkA-HCJc={Mp<{{Z9`0+(3pl{aG5 zAN^BhXxmnL|7Lzs*>8vc4mDdiMDM?R_}wDvv%2c>!}@3Yd3*BKS$hAT?N$DzexKe|FFW2{UVaF2S%0mQ zH@=^s(OG}ymy{o_*|DZ?tooz>tiY}RHm51qnN?}3{*3*v9eCfD&bw$A@saw2e!0L6 zdZSAX*0a!QKjU*~;J`#Z{z5)wKmC8`!$nW(>+{wXh(E~BDzZP#_49CiCTA~IbhbZp zp7O(zO07n+9YyI2Iac8Q`z~)8?Gk;97AbkzXm>?*r~VlS0Yc9OUkT#s%ghNs=>1tX z==n&~j{dez_eUY}X>a&zJMTrsJM=38?yhk!cC74F3P|~-$Y;D*osG9w(db^(N5)*` zhs}p-u1VGCA+)nB(0lJqcqmPyXCt5S_V3M|npM^49<$j zS4jswR(%x$=gTOrTpjZs6E49U> zLJ!YNT>P;t$Q8v`%>C5~)zsI;OF-v7(?^!1&gVL>@TbpL z_H#XY(;sU_CZj%L*^>$Ua$D7PDKrGBJTDmiCnR}Zut5(8`1!ox#=Y(vd0xmzzVJt$ zpKB_=6PGbZ-3wjHbsFf*_jOUYQca%Clx!+8luNnUURB@e3zT1&FYL$9kWLynYq^a%0Go^-Jc@s%^Ei-evvL2mGj0Key((SGYdP_J{Jl zO8~f=Iu(4u^)Kovc*Y~~#lUCUj?UzIn2zUu70OLtsQj@1r+sy~K1RIMOCj1zKIGbf z7mV0VJ9IxvKGy^D40z^ywfwMu%f9>WNB;14;=iX~B#w)aPdi6H{PPL=L+GWTvpxEL z`!SF93q9i%Whd7IgQL3rMSF#w1-kW!il?WhwYo}Q56lLg{r`2V8~m<+_dOSMjz4wI zF8EUa?t4DvKc?h=cI@TDd>pg(6-iv_mzjpl9vEBn1>)o8M z{PEM4LwjR=H;whK*Q>Pi9M%K)xgO%ey^fc5?nb`Ei^P+09n9FyjdaFYQDfydUB0w) zzoA^xi;-Vypo=_S($3RgReq4XNPBuwwetYd^p&dImfo|A_@0UUI==KJ#pi^)7HQ(C-DX(aUAEcM*TdHcp~nRmrG%IQ46;)a~r$0u3hHF^Q^ zi`S@q;@i#)t)$QU`JHV)aHF?c2Xb9U_jfVqte++utljwhqqI@uwb9?E#mc_FJ{xym zGVCH=>~lhHCU9T0=zJgrINg5E+qXB|JT6Y7m)Q?~_sc(+<28B#^N}vQyIrRQjb3Iy z=mV~*`#_>br~lm0vtf%~pX>hfY*OD}F}f&VGC4ypLO_g0Ab! z{=flz$E`^t(=wqb5*^R}AP4vnUH)xQ)lv~}jL!n#A6#6sezo+9cw>JM1b*4E&5s-4 zk@4BsABaThCoG5`(-P&MOr$~&_lxm%?LOS6UZ^I7@WqsCcGD(Kn&NUiJZbX7VX^y*-ZySEWJ$IzF93O~UViUX z{gL(030>sTcBa%bXY{1;W2Q_VJbKdPF%u^!p}M?`H( z?he;^*(LJ5kne{45b&p0zI7zl_m*tXoBC%gRrW6Yrl@+X?=4w?r#^Pzn^zvRI@b4= ze9(jVT;NmIHcg22y(Js))ZYty*ZAQ@vA(y&`5ezf6ajy9!B>-OnWOz9?Y$K90-nP# zzp3mMCrUr*e^1p5igr~9oNxZKhbntbQJ3J2?X`$7tzpea{ zzoK#HR8Mrg2;SIUvw)v+Vbrj++=_T(dvyUHx~{Z(RaXqWp}pno-v>qw0x~hLE#JO8Lz9YY=%YtIABS=|ti62UVr~Ov^ zPI#@n9@P>o5m?zD!RIto@`*3y?~1>?0 z*BvuzsrkbV-DW(%_b%iTyc_s3eIWl*pD!((uj_cH0dMsxeO`)tvooK6bi8+^>c_Kz z3qYS?&dEcK^Z1B=@SXnv^zeYMW0RTh#QJV3zw_?`z7Y62?Ok;%Td0XjMZU3qL%?rt zG4_`#=@s$Z7nue58OxNte|m1MBm0^3OX55WanA4j+kqEcczjCqr>k~Q+*8%d(Z#QB z;`kWWudE%E#osFBzriWHn(+CGWy*M$5BY^i&F%i!n-K07`hy*z(%f6q66-QDJg9i-bq=lPR*lltYK{jA+9 zpvSvFZ;ytzZehvakKg%UxF?RZpJWf{jK8d_lwWp!@JyC*pR?Fw2HuM_uWms>l4cLf zy8-2OcWmt6(>8V~_3^fkwzt+VZ9Cnx=4<{=LR`iN(e@truhQyD^J{+&{aGz zCqJxnGPs%Yvq8TR<=0tzZ2GaS6V?h{>Ngj3+8cnq6KbAc!u`vFl}qrY2LI%PzkS+~ z4-zdASlJ)(PZ96|;98&CKOi}Ve>y?G`c)Fmsps$hNQ8v>DIIVquWXM zbcps}o#YR@KkRS+2Iz6wA4dDHL2m0i2d#N2@|$yE`Ej|R(|@5QYfGNlogJY3e9&)3 z`FFiC{g+A`lUfR0{80!x`!`P=6)y+IKiWISx?6G<@bq^P?oa>PWqOQtx8w{1-u#iW z=b`oAv^K80iN8zX=Pcm;vHx=c_x8t0E4hzTY?Djy{GF4s{tx&wO}1Bw zwV$&>{|EfhO6|Uo{hazG@+6-#7MuGA^_K zL-j?($+(=0e#j1f&PQ@_uj6H0&O^Qk5I^&K_3RgWuRI>L&oH-P^!y@d;OF=1$-m^t zp&=|YEI%>d!2i&OJ5%TjDL;L=vO5!Lx7wS=mA|J6$F+f9c*X7#=-~jL>oc{#JqP#H zLGWU?2l;X@*J|Yg;y@&4?tcBY4;uK8m&*9@p+i4-sKoMJpz?gD<@hYfzO z9AmsSp6m7i-}c3X1kOd3bg?hI&(SciECgOKq94~Oso#ouXSZwmRXF!p{3Vo! zdC>N+Qg6}EZKQvq?Ba8Oi@oxheN%tm6gl#jGx3RI z9k+l#$>&q!HtVzFqHZ@OI22g)b)&ojq}D1*-ok0CpW%88L`y$Y_Wcj~&kw$NP1aoG zdkf+v9-N?;AnkhU??P>!lw?^Q9S?)fG_rDB7k;ikIlC&oRxCStA|9hxnaze&zdN(F3h3fr zuFJE(DFD7{@Vm3Ac6wH&dVR3J@dKZ}`{S``Srzfd{-y-@c?qYwRJB&b8~Yneq4Lv( z8M9hd%czJq_BRgTAK&s&yL5B(x|fWT>~HjOK*kLl+NT@*95;Np*YPrL1duNpMdIp! ziYLx*rglGfR2w&v%%3VdNMABO|1jq_VZWvn?@{M(+0R;m&%V9cCGMZ1^@8^U&+*v~ z{J0($RwWaNRL1E-!#JG_yg)?%{Kr*4%W;3$%&+(;9iayd`d6QPUD>*m#D!7+5b!7R z^R{t+7}XNIQGfF~<)0PzHawF=AX2F}qy9n?ySykT3;ZsmLYMiCTe}y0kzu?s55xEn zkr&=ifP1#zqGrc_jz?UJpMsFb_H=XgPdf2?Okx+mo0>aR$t?lC>w#u(CdY_(wh#W^ zPx^Z0hy4E8Z>3x&-t+HK@@>FB``WP@<{0r#d*j3*xFp_v&?^W0jQ0ZE>v)OxLgb4G z@ndO{iWlOH`(})E;gfoFU|ouQ%(o>gd6^rO{gN;HX-Wzb1s;@NQdY91iKxg~SKJeaR zuIC6n6LcTarO&xL>gQ~^&!!0Ve{X7XQk<<^Kc43=0snWEO#7nj-=yqk|MLFnTi({~ z4}vcfxHFkA+?Z@v@}++<#-9VYWz%o$&i#7|9eF+|n?EuBa)5v4pSWjY?c+1XUjgvj zhOT-w);>OC`~`uppZWWgSm*f}e|me3^hb;}MRY zbjc@t&mrx~xPROO{h8_2M9N0}MrU2yT4pq;aq%&n4F?DHjsY5uPQrud8IG*CO2S)F&{&U9Sxq}Ct z{Db-w#n4CgS2O>>+7)BtQGo2PPT#8RnfTJ`&#Z*ZvE}a>2U@>37+pS ziMIj2Yxunnaep!G5`5WvUf^<&j@dh~7WW$yFZGaxI4FgE1;Ep8+Cl#^pZlmw40z_7 zx0Tmt*uQ1_t1ZZ{)NO9mcapP^Pdn$oZ>vRrNPEu)o%7`drWQZZexc`r&i&PQ6}ysY zuh8>BH*Z&Q_vp?3TNB}Lp%;SAap#=-=Qwib_P-D4`>RVqXFosn!Q^My zKTCTu)_cZw<)0zbpZXwHzih1cEZ}EOeSc4^e%V;>F5m+vd-jO6znb-~*Q@l)LDXkH z_}PvExYzO0FBc?|hf-SC{7m-H+7rVc)3l=o;-2 z-pKPM@Fhs;$Ml`bUg|G+@uL;_axZ?$HT2Kk+N%Fm^zeBCyx(KI-qdx@(fDkks(SE1 z9^-ZAcdw4u-`{#cr=R*x{5(s0f14DbKA89YlhFPY--n7Hb89Mn^6}n11bpppzd9G| z{ZlUXBiO-b4k$mo^3&S)W4(W}?^E?`2VWNOBd5G-i}n7A^BBH|aRI-!#oJ$A?)_6f zzBiu_{Or;eAI18f2qbA><)mR^<0X39WV8q{&{)4OMlJp!)D-nbKFnY>bk3) z?Eh4)s`X#mNxTE{I=}ey{p=5Qd|AJMbzL{`8#k~0mi;5~5_kEAxbtcHhTB)74c~3! z_mXG-bx+woJc$dVewVXH+Nt?yaPxoN}!ECwL#|rd`TTelK}($Bt>q74a2*Cp;5;#Y^V&PH|R{U-sUJ--mGm z?>|G9`YJFyIR7TehFy0shZ-H(a~B+I=kqBJC^}`Fy@|;=2#C zA}saA87l;r>*#$DD;AD zDxdw*sDI`K^>q!(w|=es5&ziv3(1*EL*ch0zqq^7BmCBIcq-@;_gu&4eAos2zYn*u zrdeodxjZxI9;BsjR86i5oXE?%MU_K&g}}Wx@~#ucb0DH$2>vPpF7BI7t>rteaz*qr z)Q35!?40oWjiah7SlM5RFJpZuIfhRsN%|&sh-FBU2B^j-W3zMB(Cxx&(>4DFBs$< zwSw>4gzf{~a$NPRQV0C{HxWy{VL^`W!_m6_?#+whaivbsc7Zd!uR^VSfvFf_i%e)u#ux@{3d@{t5*eQMt(0|}( zd=}zfmm_`*B47C_!4xp~(Hd0q9-&LQr0a5|-1H*lkNj^Hp5EC^o zRDB1r--pjt&!=7UNMeql$}hoZn4|F?$ZOJi^1&o$IadA?Jm*)1!0~qs9-Wo)X>tra z&qL)wpAhx^=3uiFM@9L;FQVW7XZ)c2VP0|DYB|54+b{a0<2)kgXLjH}yZP5ca(=;x zFTi;^;&XvN)IYDdvZW%v*o}S!^JXvbZzlA4OwKPD&zf%67pDzYZo{Y;Cs-kBD9}KE_>Q%2d8=9ceb3u2&|A(&WHz-k~=Y!7n zT2l9wnn@bH5Oj`TtB+-OPuA&^R6kGz+=m^Sf0+V$xPHp!|JO1Jg(!7@nQ$Q#;)lN)13cqH7pZ$gl_c~ts z4L9<|mlB6&!#ucfW_f=l^-|$?DzL9(=HIW*=6qGJ7vt|>6r;R@9UffEahQ1N4~^vu zP5MJW_|kt;exY49+#Bu6M!xV%`{6zZ?tApj?Xynb=a3IP_pt?TJMj?hk^Y7A} zu%Gj<>eC;&+}%k@ z+tH1D4X{`BpX^HALXK!2j zqOQLOeC*E(*F1BpuD=U(FVa<+eGlvNaUbeGh%^A)mezl+y4-x6@e=}mX6M@;yxe@8 z@sm-k{PlZ{r&?ZaKF;{D13%~L!y97F#~D9*yODP0f?spN&vxd;y^fdu!;gFwcL}DT zq5t4~4RINt^{=XrN+%jTEqP!3_H5_MjUW3T=y8@q%1)kp+kSo3OV!$~EhOCrI?pkU zetG7mp8MO?2R+^iI@hyXcWIrs?0ZXOh7pdt_|Wre9B27omfU{tjXz{ur2GOy`L{k- z^8Kr?c_N>@3-ibM4dssaY#&=$b3(rT$?*Ly8(r?@TdN=zu z;ddGMpKyQMU+2#QpATt|LA9Rd{zc(0tgOZdmf!38dy;hiAoxmGZ@tg?#Xa7a{t;d4={)`jqA$~KKD>U(&6?{2J+3pK)Px}Nfek(-2;;*<*kMrur zO_uP;qd+5<%rk5T`%5)>;kZgHyj|JP?>yeN;cP?li``tW;J(1imls|yKC1lULRxLr z_FeRk#Bo0I`5b=W>Q7E_eiDgu1O1hCo0C~LLN5ZH_0+}l*VkMRkEL%Z@a}G3{=@YE z+9&m7^pDUY^#s0*W6B=ZlO6ZQdU7IP@oVRq4k-VYELQ0s57u~;{-7RGPx*#=D$wLf zoU$G8eF*Izxug5kSaHhrnG(pcesXGtv0Sm=ST5}kf-mE^!G7FVupjxtFZIOpOhx$p z>F$SKXq;dXYJ{HX#Xerno7x@R&`_T@`6&^?oOgudpzOKX z6jJ*0JX7{}pS0!tLunHkFUsbf1(0h2-&J=fPPp88rc!)I!2$e^f`Z*i;pY_n5`B#4 z3*5jT$r_ZF9DYvGFTr!&&xZHqKH!)A^{6++@SGy?Q;7KCJhd2jksGd$#DbA3{^;+w z_BIJ>{*EtNs@5gA=2f}=v>*L7T1GxcCH2YkOsvmWb~oLg5E<>2{~RZjpL3A%JX8FT z4R0qpb?YMdvVMjB%L8Bbb9<-8I?t2|x*zGP((7vI=b1{7&v@wm>n)|R&NF!yC_g;7 zaBR%;OqnN@9gT*bni=m>dW-#xN1kU|vhacRaT=ZHnR3AY`u^|cCTR3Ld`O+`)xr*nR(tlNUK0o>0 z^RdqNq(e?7aJHwM+qfPe{-7Vs3za`VZv4}zIMlPyc|Oby{_hrVeN*=*?d5aHxlQLr z==S=-M|&%^O#M=~w*d5Fq)Ypyo{MEK&oh}$DSJl@Zv9Ctd!3MD0nUDLbD@5o$$@;< zU)t=v`>SND_z?ecosRuY4)BfoPK^5Q>hF1X|J|v$bI2Dp8L^C;fH+S zZR7qaiMc=glxlCm3F>(u0Q_&=b}i(4e_g(3x55=cekt&Cs#M(*YkxS$9S?pF%=(+M zdt$XEHyF?P$hcEv7`t+)84*guf%^L$or=0@2_2n|1!=hf7G~d(EqN) ze|F$~C+psJCH~6=e&Oe{0$1WcFZIc3d{r#}1=FJaR|Ne3SK_~X;CFue)RZgnUjXuVB;U;UlEAgKT_$ePRdoY&&(i5Zomk+%7Po7T$xQ~+zT$1mB zogo9>j`}s7FOOrvo7oNw`2qBgnOeS_@9|(9DXy;O5iFl6=QVsDw`=^=Gd#aZaccQ8 zKjH7eL z_hCQ9hfb^cQ)Iz8jJdn}`X2dDpBO24@k252+;_@#sn5F{J<2)~tXxulMs{?ZnM%v! zL+s=^7s}&vnEQ>fX-0WsX9aoTa%BFS3AqlW{63=__qwde{8!UM^t4|ettabQ?2vMe zbjg=;iy+5(O0A>jUa#u4^#3R~{X)6@5|{oB3eWFTlzhM3&iWNP-|IQRm)fky{fSa| z_!4>!^0}_pz}z>feBCa5zRTeMJgt1O%Scyp6HGqfGO&IY)c7QBLfXCf&p038JYVF= zx^l)vWw$>;`I$DdUYH7=SGb(yEbvL5l#^FAx}Lb7OXyOL8+e-mNBK+z&r8ZFh$^T2 z924WR#)l_{lUMY}HuyDU;O99e@;`BG&yI5b@V+XXyJlYX^Lv+5AE{US-^yPcw`}fR zQ{wR6L)s0`F;Tt?`0=A_Rah5~#1ZHoq~A7M`w{Cv;=pK+=pylL2EGs}d5UmP{RJ=W zss#CRFXiU1SN#d!2mLv|iJv^;$HH!g`ur!lefTyi{`7lQzx~|OfgAZgTIAb6&jH{5 z@0UKp@l@z}$hYA8PHiXtcq5He^R?nhdy@t0#_`NM|#EC%kCHl`D?{9yszbV=!5{KVFM zmEaHYuLb^P`^W^Y^OBY+vAz>muujD(@ebg7pMI+o=S1|Ev}+zv`_ktTtols0-o~udx6yN_{6lJreBiRQ2sC1?ij=J z#cxLWN^W>RF8BgSLt43EKgFBkls&}f8}#(L%KJAd$4D2x$b1HJ+}K~ve%FC~WBs_a za>H?zV%(nkLY8EJQvdHedZ40xFhmP;BU&y2d?%HiHj>?UPXz5x5GaAs}T4N zMSWi6Z^aNFi917m3r*tA3OOP0Gu|_jV#j+X@`YdQ3RY5f^IS}5_=RqIJ@EM;2YlUA z@*dXvxjf|a`CwJ;&zrHIllD|(XfHmke6h<&S9*o#`@r$}phV-7e$bq(>=S(0pJm@U z;(HXLdX*aV%F^UX`|#bS+85i$H*@UYN?CG6>KorRxw7)Y`voE2i}dXI ziznHxr5=iqPd_%z$+zf!E;Z1{6n|b&?&t7%{gmkTke}pD*VY#*yqC=a{`1E1PZ;A} z>c!|EWp{Xg8}!HqKV!v%d)?PEt`{I*_{C1!_t=+?^CZc|i5dESr~(rmfA7o(`jpkP{$qcj$1USE2wcaezYaI{ z10v4>dI{23@0^e@jdF{h)^+XXm1MtvE&rJw0CW(T-*N8=Ys2 z3Efm#*=2_Oxx<=l)!T^$bPLMK@4TjOx&7hz1D)mH`MPZkmG6Wf7i^w$Trb~k z;9oOp%`JNQ1)wwTKAbRBTQ3RQ4|;HbDkrH`=#d&_^%M3l=*37cE$*LIQ>Vjkv~NiZ zf0AyWr3(51_-EQ4{}A0i8|buu+;JMZ2stH4)9asZt=mU`2GKvJzO>xO=iEsB zRz>?rQ+DP~`SBV4eu~hYpi__QQ(M22it$J29`N}f-#PXh5BqbW7l5DplDFK@ZJb`d zA9RijH=b-UP%qzJs^W+9-bXi2u9sv{H7xQ?)s+66Cme2n`>te-&hg3u+=pL(-cMgI z3jL|ZLmTLeN8i4b^H`Bzx>oi7PS9^`ILyTL1fjc;&w2Oo(Z0=e~56-DwGW6#H3-YPoGmd}%)BQ)k+kl%m z?C?I_e}0tf1l=@#a`#k}FY%uX|8U;!25wB>!Bf%<^L+7FCh!Ho{jj|E)T&xM1xKp- z2!cN7*zG=k4?*~IF@Lc^uSb8bwKrCMrB_$}SbStC$ z^^smf`C)g<%4059ADO_t+-8bfua6ScgA??$J_`!@-3h4=_AhSG>yB&iQgy993y|-t zrTUjZ-oxW-Xmmg5>>n;pSn;a-{-InVpW|cJd=-h3SIZsm2rsA!*xw69s+&#Db`=mZ! z%0a%vs&M0`U%f$}51Fo4`P6sslU@2y-&p;n5AtsAQ|BYj>vVncKo25qTj!4%oG*xf z+_e8HW&fd8N7v}}Zvou``koezcSglO^4*zA@BAkZJN5YYBmSJgb=dD|UQ27APSD+; zH@ha|VALBc<|HU*tzKTI-d{?bErKWBl7!@;|libl)c+tI9cy<@ofR_*S(n!>GADAKI8kJ zT|Zf4#W(eJ9_wwQzOmvv5AvG5x1>(2_|5^{hxF~g_72eF+e!ODKeF7tUax->=%%{L z?(XS_KGx&gf_%nzV0FLy_4qD8eA$3Yo%vV(Ra*QOV|;Rg?rqxgxjGu%jeJWz)qXtx zKJ`Y1MlZ(vwg9*~1yB83SEIW@_k-T@c>bUDGq#f zUmnte$v>>;*+roj;Cajk`r^ZV##l7@PCQQrL67&`-Q-%0UV?mIN9B+01CI@Eq|r^_ zPp_~1aP5G4OB!qRVyuH?f_~tIn-ZF6bO-V&KQM0Mp{5$$4gMV9{{H#pZOuTJbwcBM zl8|Jb$qBwZ%10`6S-%Zv_Yptgcar!W{j_Z_K9yh*bYz@L^mbRzMLg#+DtrC_?VL+e zMgwI(_t9Q`=DA}1Tu~P2e9wK}dhq6WyOJM{tMYY4;CQa6cxUrhE_be|6n5l-Z|--d zOP4!W6r7{%@B(kQzIGwWs`TJr(Z_hMs0jE|pS-#Da_5Tp-F|aJ<&Q5bCq(u)GG?U= zsULoqpYOS{fLHYR#LVlW{XN2Q$G4il48@?9nT#*O#jH{I&n$P+7oPMsz zj(o;L`x(AJVx24EclrA}s`rV5UJ|c72jhVp+qYj%)6c;$9(kU|S9gOa*14hp_zNDG z*(SlIOcwbeSyOj8m zJJvZHo-1+z_v)wFkHtD?3;b!@54B^RD`J16_e1jj(uH>F1wYr?i*T>w<$Y2K@};GO z+ey6bXVnk!9YVEj6T9bBTi;IT(vM~~Qg(Cv=6=5I*`+RBwvrd#|7UnV;sC#*ho9d* zRpT(_Tz6=|Hy?iJ5+>rmq{J8tm5;s=l%e{<$?o8!h;<(RI(c{a$vvK^zT0aS9>_@$}T>tj{k?%T({TSzgJbq{6 zownaSUfQ?w5%9-(LFacidJKBuyV?Ugo}>H#=v;e$;o9tnHzXZu4SEvSLD`>mdj0#8 zaoRjN@S4)!+*H{+G`Qh*{k^3X`9)Yi9KH5&r(Vx?&}|n~Jb#riYK#8f(gk`bNzvO4 zTv({Db9)T*PPYYLfR*n|7hD$zK~VmyjGUg0=Q z_G)sZ|Kj=Vx&XOLZn^o$mlq;6E%f}LS|9Gcs=-$xJNNYHYif0UXtKa14%3?}`x%E% zv~007r+5Byq-TQ8I813X>!w9Fwdw_WyaROVdw=DR-uq(5;&nog%tJwE|LOil=`;R+ zrQK+&VC52g3H<{9=7E1`+nd_PD_GfI@pDm!X#e?v7f{%~#8S|?4`c5Bf6Dgx$-FRd ztLn$N4}ex+u)L&ntMXSS(p{nTL#UU~oyh07-Kfo-c?lLJA#CpjKKn4` zv(l{-Cynku`rc8aC$;JNz~~7hA8FHdt5vqBf`p#8NAYKZK4ast zq5As11NqrMD%|FG>h|LLy6{`Up95Tt{=t9Jbot1qzn&O*U8Aa?OZ`}0QuXUW>H~gM z@7brgE~T`M)OV5_b_Ria`C{Lh>5%vT)BpEQo;-T;#Mcj12O z&r9zIEXx16pg-L6!*j9xp9lKf*}FQ&^1l!CX5%Ui)BPVrKK(!Y|1oym@l93lJ5AFh zZ7GCZreTOdh7lQMh+zno8Kz|i5e%~804g(xV3c8)7Ey?xSOp>MvLwig0vd2onFT?D zfJ9KJi1^E!^StfJO@4m9_m7_DKF|A}_kGX2=bn4-5L3^1@ehGFG+BUy)jc8ZwC^16LK`11!(S<2(8V1qwd@Od6u2>z2RD^8_xRX(Vn^(yAIrUu3J zpX}%FjkA5u!Qa0i*%$NOhHS`hRrj74$G({FM&y9+zx~M^rF~THO8dxuvOA0AkQO2( zJY3FdL&Io4TzFre3j61GK3U>{JTLNf67v}gRzdBD@8|q)`Gwzi2K|P| zL|kUSwRVjb3aOkeIM4pox_|R&o}UxW``S6bMTcD*EBXF8vP2MPq+j><{EvthwOZMqD~5ZaLuFdx-t_Z+5+NMq@6<`MzET-h1>@ zxjseD?UOv;FU^OZ3-4QcX)ML^S&-xREcD2~txB*K?K^1}gIo3NAr5?>D< z&%^V;FL&l-f)4r0{389cMLP+Cud2S_zTU!2k&^z*Hw2HrgPYz+#Ai}yL>qdav3yYc z^Wa}5ct_iwcqj!t!uh^!Ht;piTY9ESxWBLHSMoZF{yi;tue@BZ^B`w`R`9-ZE_{#Y z+@#-!{f7DA_4;ebN8FzfUWoH1mGHyX;D`BgyJq{+pAfjaZqIIf|B2+e{;+(xt}{1s zU5?<8%jqrbn>_Q?ZgT$F!1=vE?JJF{E9cMkI|sZG$s3$<{uwx*hcsKDf_8+_uBKl-g=o{$Z{&i(k|$5HhKeD=5dqN?ZE->`fF z_cy*RLXUTOpT|eO)h-wMHTovPAI|@oXY0)=wl6$y2hRP`;&pjZ{ZS@xuJ0|Ybek{L zca0IxJ@U9@Oqx(A>(54i!u`!J=^rgs+XRFB&xL;OPj-KJe?y{#bARFo?~9SwrX)$Y z3+IDKAF6ujAMQsY@og&n&ww4@eO+an4)Woc{KaDdr+lBH-RSV;z{p`kN2`htiZ{nG z6M9Y8&vdUd@580UB7M9^mQ!B0alAav(SG=_kx>*VRu8>^e+f@2KtG<3a&UaP^;vmb z@QwM5+hx-YwIYW%=9A_)|wtC)yT%TlrO|ZiO-oMNCcS*JhMmR?Q z5%=O67q+V??mp;wWyyvX7y6IfPnyEGCW!N4osna}^$SPwZzS&e=E84|OW*ScbL6;~ zfOA~#=@K|c7OU+~;60lhNc)l`&YF7na05b>E%e&4t>)EAkroF8O> zpJZBjucU>UA|-qHJ$u}r+QCjv#vA4E!^s$7*D>rgMq zoh|e`&+ObZ(UX3ijQa+vvV*bPS zuAh2nsz&mg+Y66-x)tXSCKy$bgXEpi>p}Wm;M}z&r@$#LHk{{j^Wk^Lv-kJMi%UB2 z0;C`BX!&UJ|Kc||lylgwBEQW~3cpwNZ`61E=XXyMPIhJCJl8k&^SvtH+|x+9pfAY) zel}9`#ChFQz$1Oiel-`oHS?#IPPLJi;)D3g{=pA^LP~942}S!$yRuk0U8twkILo!HT}q&1eW>>skguV3Qd;iW9GeC{83KIH=c7tcdYx!toA)e}G3 zcOH0yn-2M`v{^6+4`O~81pdPG8HO?v&hyK3%!6~@_o(Ihw&^M1Umoz`4Hhhr=i5$P zNAdNBKdnk7o-0uPcF1!*NNYW7LXx4#K6Pd@(e9tUa&~{X{i%+Bl$bYn*|x~Ho2b6! zLZ0tSYRYP?QExVNpakFUo%H=kCL`vk&0?F7#KTfgtxWUDQtUFgq3+<0EoVMv-; zp0~IxBEFXPLeIA6R=v;jmT-O3as9W0my6UnDf0=9C6Z0iAF7|q`sN4!YLj{Ul2Gm} zK=x+>FGO0UT)VnjsebUhjQxKwd(9SvG7`VcHmDzX&qCh^V~?pNdB!cam&xMqBvXP^_EoZ882moh0uMit9OEk9fC3mm9J_*$VmFU#`rO+Z)#x z9v43SuI8(1qbhPl;stq*M}^AQKS~5n^+k_(nULm#@3U20&h1WU6a86C{|Em5@20=6 zWg=3_KL@y}oruHbIgNYB{Xr(L#~?nxJ^FK3**_ETY{=jE@oZCBJ_qNyJ$gTF+JdjS zDF6HlVqJvax6wT1?lN8nj^L0lME*NJt@>37$$ow=wGg}qu4@nTH5keBa|Mjo{q=OR zjGMZPcFOvv4*5(Y+n3c|#D(#1+SPxVuN_H0&$qI{(=xWa7W&ilOm>k4mX!~8gil4?ee`UKewEN^M>vspRXp4F1o)*@;Q*t125&5t?A{Y_MMKn<^$jITgsa9z-fHs z{xOgH3Gg%r$Cr(KTn1c9D8DT5(lbRo9$u0EbwzL@?FHv~e4jII+~RbrAQ0}$j~);D zJl3d{JRZ0d@>Q~1(MeW{8Cfso>n4qhgBU!GfPs|p^)BOB-0-gj=F zc2@%~=V!zMnz3Ggqv;+M#FIYney2QvPmSzq5Xw zw{=xnzYB7?NC(thIZiHr?k`#YJ6n%EBkSjWg5_TR%?#v;NOtShZBDe;U6{)PG+89ic8cl}nN0v z8CGJ!0eSxI2hR6HUTD~69$&jh${#qF&xf9>kIMerf$O`7I6NJ^a5-5jAC9jHyzz_o z?3UxN$9eAWL%W=%-x@=Q z==iq&?j^4r-yrn!{j0)_$kL?>3f5^FzmT&v~o>WQR#PI<>`D|Wt2?_T@uOE2ct+Ma&I$fmv zai06P*GDz{p0Cph&xE|bn~1}&hYe4blJx7j{sVWE8vc3>3D3lN?$4V18dz2nxZIy* z;5x?+ekDu$r)#0#x;Fc|GCN#W(NC z^M7t{j89up{&yMAgI*KfpU`N|fFI=fM?P?#Ki&9wzfGQ>@_QF@a9w_4^Z5$$^+~!_ z_{Z(pwEjp)&OZY<-)}hB`;jJ5`D4D2iFwk7N>^9Q^EdV{8+x8LO^Tks;rfE*Grtct zmF>%e9M8Xo%<@sY4&U5^J-G1~ldH$P)`5WhN?9iyctUsIeBHes7$d4UH>KDh4^Y4HCYBM>$ z`Hzez^vg3Y*?zu0;5d9b@cA!f`!afpxbSoH*~Z1S<@~dNrz4*k zzd9z$`DX*?_)L6XTUE}VuMfEVCjB;JpIm-<3VDxp_a)iBeBfLU%G_d-8aj(M!Z93u)@`DBmHN} zV1sOb4$gCYo~T{>H`)GRUojr?{(}46@?A+%|B?@Rw(qeX?>^vl4C;Rhf%AO&$m+ot zl$l>fll z|4qHU-^u=S{mg*=Wrl-G<@n}9-eeH^r_@irDd%4ZJPY#MJ6Cnc`KR|0{&W9Xzrxgu za{hsdLNC{oBac>GBJ0nByf0hu_NCXaF3V>C&qg}%DHos<@rh; zi{l@;n-%I@BbkCl=1g~Uu8_n z+uWWxKiZ$FEN{YSzq<-{_#n??bqK$?ZzVqMch?UPe$j98!IsWvCt- z`ipYpbD0Wx{=NXq4+(9Yz+9?_%J+k|7&g;NdDB7p=RzOHspD#G!vwTTiW7fdfc5*q ze{t2D^SJ&AZ9<<5co1pm?x_@x3B^(A56MQJ8v{RmpokC4WZ*aZM0|>)73b+U#mT0K zlm3vne?&NazcpVQ9Y^-}{jKX4%l`6rhPhpOkvOoGk z!at=yMw}P&iMn8cxDTU0BJ9p=FY3uVJ^Y#ko-h$Pe1ywMr&sW8(AWOsx)s$5ex&^@ z7vryYw9xCEpYfC~B=iyPgS>l;z?c2=##KFV%Fk0poacVB0Q{o~jh{;{5PJA8@tq33 zYOshyFVp<;DFJ4Rl=wFA`8f+S_?^=%Po(-{`4;fG+-%^N|6s_i65d$8|G20h%y)yo zuHC|hX`WbqF8J)P5Bx)G8XPF;j^+C*N5>}w{_11BDwJ}@@;wT^afpb|c_SXsi4D-7$ma)e2EegID{JeHoA1-T&@jaRz(|*FwC8NJ7Y%A;zfKNK9-&MUJ+HFAxf&ZYM{1CsFBb;B+zAJ9u z1(QU5w0wPTNTP);6DhSv<4_SN3(~~0&Bkali*X0e^Zw1Js*SxD{&+&<2+OPejYNM^ zzDC(l ziSRL^MB91QN?mGA|C4@I3lRq+-n*LE`@%1!x}9#vxcNEMg9H(`H($1o+vIH!QAhGt z;CaAJ+jKww`en*6$g3T|*}v)Ot%LprJ-%T5Zs6=+xi^-Znx5?R5940o?4PCE(Y&t~ z?B2-w1HeC~6XD~dwoSgC@xrrt^gr3>9u@6hsOc+Pr}--y88-}z_Ag^bzdiF$ovhEe z894iw_-~!j`cC({09RXqvwwQmyXkZ4mbu3A4&dzHV~;m)JhI!6C5*d)vw!b?cD1gn z?}NxxCv3mk3;Yuj2p@aKCO=X2+}oGvfAY_(@bAxB2@fqi_+#YKgYXdK?I@ob>Y4l2 zsP+$JdBgL*wyw0j@R-7yh$_AG4l#v;M?y8ngciA%%a>I7XCzc}bdqxa6M~^6cNA z`$sO=HhuC!#sk3Fzt{UTUVGv2-N;rnif;%w`&X^sn$#AJPI3KBFpLoXvwtgI8~jqQ z9~TtmZwAi(E&Qa<>2=yCUqk+CEAY?hMEDr=%Dm=pymE3I{U6RhDfp4-H-aZbKU!*E zu&T~WsKDKj=Xu|@DSLILC1 z@7rDC_&h(g7%%ECH$ZEttrboUnYr>A`bqKR{wC4^h0is$-W=J^_2VYSxxH?t6XD}A z$FzZqe}7Pu{wH~^?_23a_-LgzxEEP-Bh`a&t}ojKta`=JJ8jMH8QdQg#d`(H*J)9hLa_W;ku{hh9QO?91w`+)O(yZw_N zwAM>_0dT(WRes<4Q^^vp8Y%qe@p#9#zxU^PF2%wBD#=@bbA9dl;|rBb z0H^v|!1ZgAh>s2YR^RUkr1?ZS@L%Hl6nrQ64XUKoFX?5bNQv(OpXZle@MnDaYhEc& zEZ+$}&o2wWuhOaBL4!M%Z&UCMFN%0=(XO3U+8N8YDD1a@|INqm-zwvX=11ZSz5~2b z>YTx4(f-Ik2ih&q=RM$EQ9re*T%=bo)=7Lf`ZwnLz*iTxx>nv*%%%T`@5Ok)@e6_P z$uF_6LUt@afbo;#XB;KsvGPI5P8IF3{1E0N%(sGn;_tiH(z9au2JqQ_C-`k2N`1Rh zW;CDT=f-@_3tq2?S2e}*mGgHq z_`TQu)u38>EMGZ)w}D?``HZ{O_0fE~Zs+-Xf&@j@bKtid@`=EG_$~8k9U>p+i5B)# zm-QjqBidya_U)eRb@!BV{ebux3V!++5tn;Ub^4C;W)q2@uHa{aU#aiv4f$JpBRp%B z=;t3&Eqsx5dl&uXPWz-sN8kzOvBGbjAH2}1!sWV`MTZxbPp|^#`N4(_^Hx-wJTbDg zPWm0dIsbDXS1LQ^*0wsFf5v(d2hQK$sq^F(+V+v@Jn8o;^1pfE*|RUc{db7%3n=nG zIlao5h6SD8X8j>W{&y0mx9@zYedN|ySbq|Kzm5C*C1po1N-&bN7*BcMu6dk@L%*7b zvem{2Oz}&y;=BjnfqP|t+VVsR=lkUj@TwnryS7HcO<#z45syb(pETQ7#`I?>AkYawowm@*|wfCjhx`1~+M| zmhceHbNQGzt41eEIG2y%CE=I1qH!tj(~;wA2F~%FQ6_g2?{^Z`i19@kFDv94zOb>M z*22tU`;D)O>whPBBO85FO9!6pKhJ0G^?Ig%f`k|O5BX;6{=TM`@DR=ikXGBBJT_6n zi~N5X{?A|7MI+%HKaTH(>kn^~)-!VyP0zNx!EqHTOXZWTHdD@ze*2#5^e*|_Pl+$(U++b?gY;5`R>o9>y`j6+sp0Q z1Ad(qzg0{#tD+8>&+XX_JUnixbEMzlawvMQ8}}LQMyH-#^;i2}iBIj)4?f@j z;Q7=4_q{r!qMr#y=cn-~zUTN=sox@N0LZUsUGRU)FZ{lX@gh!HNS9UAOy_w9)iW2) zb3L)InwFl3fD)byoZnA7)l?#=k#Ik7exK`ClTUU{0#5aUpC4s=gWzBPw#hi&7ec<# zLGvzUeCRyQyV4=2pCJ6<@3v>)cLEV{MDG9KJe{I)4_Ko6cOFLwr+JPWeEuGI5&_|Z z^>QlCioZ0^@k;qneQ@s*`S7}}X`%T2MqzJLy!$eIpON{6&^P+n_Djn9GNixIBlNLe z(?k)EUV|RwBr4{yI?My zkv?U4>?r#|cp=Vnzcc&cS@#n$zn5{oF5h!lUpo=kLt$K=fmugcCAar@j^E~K$UmoD)OOwoKd_~TQIYm>~e ze8(e#pMG78qdxH0Z`E(r8e{qC;qR)`ca1YAARq86=bRX+GsN<9Ye(~quL=7fE|YUy zANE^5$o_Oa^uk{&`1xaguqB6Nw&=&QkiQc==RzT$+xzEhDY1MluNQKE=Y`yJ$+qRG z1u^=yynf330`Qmbuv>WDf~CUtYrR;HbLAz61QFM=v~6%EOk3l&!##fDrCm;mGLV8fA5GE%_?R@^C^Dmh@WAKh|Azcy20t-k$=j5)&kym;}=IN zp+8}*#8>uXHt;*2`7TsBotYvfzOtWngTLg&^GQ|o(R>=WxSy3HGg~tiw3ZQW1N=cOvzJzdg18ZAI839k*`LT z3AsX~95>T65g%pTEI3c{G)~x>iRX;dVBAX|?U{9O*IxznGqS!DM^AYC&^U2^er84^ zo+pLRC+6Y2dfv1(JU&uAEf^r)N5k`{KPPD`@O3xk!*a5{VL44fHxYmRbm33A!yT&1 zdW|^G*IOkM((cIL!LR`5`Tv@Awa2K@?#M11a2{vdRU7_oBJglI>G(YdLHOkaKXFgS zgm~Y*FfIYnIRxO2+s z!WBp6Q@e1YU3kDZgU{uwpBx=u<$0&Xr}D^uPK?_*IDhKUYcI*=;l+9OXJy4DnLMAP zcn5&<_;%v#zy|WXCj>krL&Wh^^23dIzDDwf8Ny#)2O7|3_Vb#s-*gae2F~?i-uk`A zr2F?tR^VJ87A(KCL5uPxc?WQ=50>*=-_uFB8#veF%f7r(df?QqmG#97e!~+>UP@N< z-^5qemjL)Z%wt!in4-&*_{#dCdR@e$)t!gGOpUECMg23^7c=;6?hmY5LLaR^(%u#Q zD8-ffXB*1J26^sh-1sfmJL;cvaUSKOcC-}rrVpJ6A8BXW_4(M^W)b~Q?H~xg`KDN( z;Pr>J8Z-K79mFa=i0`;4c<$>W)z1`h=zMt2dY!G9OaBo+&;s+#wW7Xffd9*W(-D5o zjire11)uAw9emx6Ur+J+g3Nbc5Oy#>2mD^oEGfrUow*J*UpOM6UZ3<(>sTaj0E*o`k+!5x@C2 z2h34Bg$BZN!RPCdoOKCn5+&RZobMCfum8znjf4k*^Sa>|8yYrAl5qVjVL!L)b$dT7 zrIm0KaBkP{udMNfPQo*RbGz-4vajH?S;3;&+cs3M2ug^qWhs4^{5KgmDqIME-m zeScm_uO<1Xc0MKKJ40TRd$07p7i!)iWnp=>%_8uwz>g$7{aUH1mm~L~!{w_D!aidq z@!SZ1kEwIThwp2gq^0;Ez90Ntr25$+KCf-Bxt8O`62x~Y_!;1T7btas9U?W1*%@q3Y2AMus#H4pq>k3XoGYGY=xer0iVhlv%&^K%=_r+zx1Xs?7(J9eQR>0QGA45WmI`(?FN`c37W z_du*?_P5cm(ZeCkVHKa=@<|5BeU=J&?8L>y}D9^}v} z#yg5v2yx_fA1nBzlj2kOZ*+YA9M`J1Jb(0n&vB}>wvm(Pk0hU^678PjyRH6#H~4-K z;RTTA`Nr+UmkwzVU&4KC&)dR}vkUx75qi?5EPdoHZ!PA&j7M&4<3=Tygz1e8h%3I^fh!@_?IH zi})1cx3}ThU3#0)!+(jdykDL^SHxxV)X>3XYxF#i_{#g`nc!z_JCUDaiRCNrmuG`t z+~oO!d>9={AR=N2i?gMo(r7kH_saW&gOBDT z{_uO^6Xp0lpo9n69+$A=vCL$12}!?xzVMIxnbUv16-<+G6L9WFPISKUeMt$=1kU}y zQ*FvRN)_X3^H!1X>7>HQdtV+Id-Izkhszf2>vTb$_Z1xN`>FNm+btp*!uBWR0_S}N z+22jr?3kZfwC~Ulyb=XGeDr;9;@W3VUE_V5YU{S>{MSq^Jz#&Cqg{zh`t|P!|2h8) zZw#*gbgxsqk1xRlob&HjYWRMqdhD~1S7!p}XZW`K*z;oV9anlVZr&c9f4?z%EPKa) zev0#VDe`~&kH>ux>Rz*IJ=X6B9@z*RKDlUp@`;7-PyHHrQV{K& z_wl{3Y`s0vL#U{qdbjYO>)*#m&6_ly2pp-u{C-3ec*md4UzQ}{te^J*)_ktBG0|Nt zZ-*S$-`@tz-=>jpevZ}!UXRN+OD9QqF3yKgkD81b@{Cr(GlBb&uIN7eo=&z8=ed4Q zxH_PXUc%Ww&Odor_3Lu}rUfECod1}T-T#TopYh3}oJUt}a8W1OX9v#hW5$AdTD^qp zfxD1S>3r@g?`IA7ciJGzm;3u%@E(5TK${fk5z&s!YqWL+-w%F^DkD3mI+-cbh<RRL-(gE>8*3`gKTEM+DjWPG zC6>0N=Ux&d5z?>h&vU`Ab3gP$SxYQm*`McwZ*Tlt542<&Cj? zr9BzokKR>cD18rFsb6W29sKPl_HCjuU*^+1Lpi=sIB49lqhHT~ydNpyG#@XJep9*S z?22ALY`VS7RL+a^6)2w1Gb|Q_ zH@yCZ^Nw*s@4|`C1bDrha9)=)1K*J|XO!9)5s%1wA0a_$H|kgJm|vL zDG~pHb3gFl&mqI)`MLqP8>!E=_65FwK=s~$xN!Wu;8p)~{sNApY;TC;0bbL*m1%lo zu|I)*(eY?^d(bU89xBCk;Cr7gzAfvwERBvw%{0|+IUY9P9FK8xx2%)n;RMd{sL;9h zU^yN};2xx3mcBPAUOe20ix0fIhYS9V7Y`Ni0;C(-{xmij@u2uB_rn<875<%k_)cO< zxE;$!q&&t7oY$kx;3uUF|07ic>IT)z=+$9b*?lef-#PYay#^DYi~q7IENn?r3?9MS++6q~&0a3)!udCyea&LQepx zKT*Uvgx{PW@yTxed%{2ZO?DSt7IxVkLhk9)n;uTG5Grt>Wp|IoS2UIg9FaHf z6Y|_|PF_9#xZKWN$dCJhmlvP=SL%n7?7(x8?(@7}P0l|P=lw_zEWGf!7Ws$ki!QKN z40siQ|t{cgU_7YFO9sEb$ z`XCh9M8nF%Db)+BVqD4rpJ-G*fh*DFlQ7U*Uye@@e2$MdSi2j?CoHeA_7L(3$hUOW zr3dhDM8D~M)CXKYc3-e&Q-Vb>DF000Mdf>B;D>4nw*%+)e{1$7OQM9kfOGkuZ{KHt zTz~YybCEjUI`OHzFE)3)=+C(Rz42zf(z1Mz>GtE0A`5^bu;LH-8^i2T`qZ;jvud7R5+{YWRSTKR?s@>C!Adt9cLVm;6W z-urtF{K5NUMQ);hR@Tp4@HeKP%4NHmPxhH|#QpJn&Of7he>r~qzHV+GV=lK^poW5o z{0b2t_V4#P9kb;2>xcim{xI>~Ps$}&g#wbdL!R%i{PgO^j%o?#_`1L|Y}+|KQNmfC z>qqsT501+6xsdZC?cLQ>lJ^~lwz4vOyK&J!f#{Rt<@Y?^2eVk z*5^#<4_~M@_O@J~Ga#3R^w^y(`{a0M<2?Iw^rhJ*y`?x_dgPx2-tCh|`tW^0%0Cb1 zxjlWotA{E@k~g88^T8`S>yOvueaC*ZheF_|?wekb_Z=(amF^L77s?RtkiD@|Lkn9Dc-(grT!f7o4sCnkD_~x%(ImJB}JC{Q9t*CkS|0^I9)Fp zJ`{e^Z)%sy`E~&F%w->sxyaW&#HEAy%K4)O`u_cM!Y@e*LnHbX^G65xtp_=lX@%ON zzhu8dF%Ebnd&BiY?fzKwL;U>AswbugrjKoUo|J^~gb?_=&NVM|b=={zEjlo6SS9@D zb*`=le*f|p`{&bvtIfc9-qX9*BD3kS_K`UV)l1t5(Jp+qM1T49!)-I~6#QEyFmy+e{KR4vONKc$TX_My(*`Emic|Lx;`{31bKNf-<+xMX7r;o__ z8&(VdIsY}oj3Z?IX5egR;^aVSz8)d}t-!fm?>znS3ay!j1Q8$hzt-1n-jVwa zeowL+dh#?~Tgu}Y%X2@RI&IB2vb+~^0i;=puG-wck$qW;_~h{>C*TK0Iy*&ATSc`Lq38 zo@PVcTs8VRvd;#2)~{Lm)akRSYQ3Fjxr+0Ua@ zKG#zS{>rVJmZU|ikBqO%afm21J_Rtom~zpNASIl}SBLbQ>IdI%;P+R3*7?hQItQ`E zc&gl=?ScIAL;sA?+ak20KQx{y_h~9Z&-|HVtxxz;qWfbyAGRyzIRCcVb8LxdR%Pj}| znHv{XiBoPx`xv;~{NV4oUH7M=7a79|Dz{(-5pQnmh2Rr~%FVP+_%D}trb?%BAdYUN zjB}cZJUGpS9-NLO;eJ79lg^VpSxM3LBz=zfO#)<3R>f$X&%4sZ`Fu&AMWt2cDePza zY%9feaY%tj48xzWeM$Pyh5vMl`mLZ^?8oGBpx>Qc8xqid2)9%f^O!8imG~$9raUfs zl0-XY`Ccc>y(7zKLoNsDm>UhYB|?9=zUeZt4=Qk4_?rjbvLD`iL?as?u{Rw3LDBKb z2cP}PS{!X}g7&GRah&S6GC$LL5s&4b-t(O$=zHiQ#_yzl;`9A1#uE;pW`@oq`<;3e1Mttwgne*o(YV;q3 z8#f3)U5NM2Cnir!1Wx${z83u=ud7?YKbrr}OFU2F{D|*W@NM9$=5;y8*AdL8{CRvd zT@~e5rFE^+YKLGD?t^@O8Bu;WCN*f52%Pe>n8bchwyyyEo}1RJ*4Q{FkrLmi;H$jC z|2kuyycB00N~cor&ES_@5!CX$igO`*d4GVduCS}cZ)^Tiy9FbHL%y)A@TdLPn@VYb zlYIq8MEUZ5E-(1!zZp3{$;mm1l=wdI+5Z6e8skZ~7I9)J;(HW))kfj}k`R1lsEIc^vKzLfi;1~~a?JtgG0UHHK-J*T%b$tU#iU*em==ePvH z|7&RfN?MeU%r_|b>03lxjy->&jn2bNkw(htr|5FZ1pkG-=j!mj7nUM^K*7%j|Bmai z{>e^eiuAwZ-mHi$$2}kVR&{v9^6!o#e-TNJyX~y7S2cU%NscSw#;w9nZjUX@zi&*E z;;w=m$I$}*;4!-QwLZ$F_#i(E&P11!4gAMH`t&hfoVfeIXZ>#Q*LPi5UhgT^P5+U8 zkAm+5|5x3u>|}Q||G(pio3mjNIgZ9{A|7@AerBC-sb)KAq&PY7o?=r|(XX9(CNZQ5 ziTnt+Lyr4_3UhZqnFO5d&TJArj=I2a+4|4c+5(}6{}SJ%;OByG(vBUb3ouip#Mgt* z?IR!jj}ltf(feZgrpD3s=(h{MlMf#6m+Xz@XFd_l&j3H8!_ccKo@oAm$Gv$GS&n-S z^!;GgZc^J8MLHLXtM>yjkF*^U_l*{{U$RGo=hg`?fE@Q5L+?GkF$p-uMfn_rDo^I4{b2$4Jx<%NmU71OGi!+JBQxX-JB7bj{!0IZ_xrIF*>6b%ALFbA{7t_; zcstI%KV9x7(Qa&*mpH&bw#hm$-utc{PmA%~hIyO^{GTdL&Z2#P@xs7x{weMS|aTqe6GJ2hpx<40}tC%^t>lu zU#WHrf8T0kQ78I@9{x-Eay}K$6BxmJ{$qR-EVjZcVCwFsT?#tHi;hgq*$K?xDV;+hc;H##j$q=;(vNYpH_Fe zwt9gygyXN)W89kwyx)h{cUukbKLfmIzR&kd{_HmQ7ug@{7b0Hl?;mS_Gq68Yz7F8* zZ}KC@%zV8-{+fZazi#~QGvWArjfbo#K8SBn@V)qbuHBlhN$z4U{YUwS5SIe*9$MD7 zqdrc2X2JhSX9iUJ%~ZWA4^i1@t)d}Wp2Csh7+z+BFs>jU4P z7;<>?ayfqPy&`@b-y@HvndSI-fpdIo<{bNu<467lfOC9rs++BpuD7%f;5-is;djS` z^6n%LSy_Bge67H_JPbZzU-J6}ZM2H`M#@jYw}9V#!3Xt}*IQ(-0elB|)v`V-Oh$Q- zJ~!GW=kEdU!%3a%r=VY9izD?5d>?rBe_Lj!#_4~?qkI~-zLI!jz>RN7M_9h7d?y00 zvZTe~PUoiZb09_YT)uv0V~#E`In^0)32@!|MadjIluo(GdZ{Cqw4w+`?}7WPd} zDiC`3FX`j{$qk+*weI`cU~zsvoacGUxc#N|x?;Sjf0_e-Djj`wo%UMG>!gA7^Lh-| zH%Gk>K1)Ek5^nr5x;<|-AF|5pH5TCP@0QE;8z(}Z{8a(x^0VRhhE-#0YMf+6@j>|& zz#k`g*J^irOCQG{{;18M*PB|vq-e$_$@;GzB{=0M*p|& zyhTtP{e!38 z*{E|AbLl_g8x(vC_+8%Ld|P?HlI#tkoE+fY`hIHl6qHvae{T19Pq7EQUiIzwQ_)Yd z6_NZEd>{C)ulnaq2|qJM8p$91WC*;uGwXIt1CPp^=WDN_yh|*6w$j$O_D5d(MmWzG zCIer1LEUC_>1J&x2g13&Oa>98o6hDe6xPzl<~2feRAUL0P{T9uv(3JLbwC^x&9vgaA*5O33mf$e}`uM z-B|;i{Ivq-`sl^)j%_b*O0o$*_%G#W1|C4V^4VEGCdct-8T?tNY0E!5@cq5u9Lj_A^Zf~K@5de2`XosH*!Xmz*DmR- z(R|8Z1-==)??3-YpAsj&A0U2fI&?o!>*{awNRu4jmB7=MWYw(qdWDXRbNl%ac(%*z z**bmLr-YNeKIF^&8Q(WwJ*rv{<$68wJ>VC`1HY%7>bXLBzk>Kq1>f+sh)4eN<13Z- z%_$x>=7U%EkgZMV^*o;cbclpMRtdJGUSFYdKz+X1C!^;&jWBJPU8#nmdbj=s>dk9%7QeKMt z#Xj(x*yr_%_dY`9`b`M@FIHQI#d{y2a{b15OvLB8`_)UtdmkaM--r=SSW3_1_^>Wx zg?u8MaN@Vj58oG0$iaD{g|WZ1;B%UU->NH7vAaN{?^Kki@OXuo2l+8BW&^88$o1-vfxGRh|wgjqxT(L zs(SFgkQVx#kmLTpal86`6U@c>3%85)Z4Y>}9_@BcBjG-Uea~0#J3C3j^*e<;`}gfr z=Swgit}jK;T@*l%>RaLOrInjbYoUkjCB97~^zr*pjo`O(|8-FZznLHD524ozp0>l% zXZ7HbJ{53&|EUwaMX$_Q9`Cs!Laekk{exxs(1 z?aQ@E;rO%tBo&YE1OKPe6P}~KLgrK4yo&k}0-y9z{jeSt>+@`9l~b>6mD``?goqEf z-)7z=?{fQ!)PLX{k8}D<`?y^Z?gY;LOUogHKhqVrU$tkmi04COQ202p%6Yi@-mfC> z4WatxgFM^EdY*pv>TD+SU;0h;!jJo( z4&2A*_a9#P#j-icN>arK@s;}t^xum(jLu&+O=~IU(tpHP?kC6q|3QP?B)6Jfh!M0nhz`_f-1a zkQR72URq`O<+8p$BWCJi%TKE;KR@{XtKJ%Vi^!M%l740R6@qWsl8~5;_963?RrPN1$8Ws8|Gn!92q1S_yzsnH7Z&_E^?}T8q z9Xk7Nao?8bHN4MqkEv9Pc>64k?}+x|Lh28SxEXtW;J1R` zaONk~)fU0yztq3vKz|<6p&Kvnm*2w|WPGyF^XI!2hih=XMe_Pn!k&CX^2!02AcAJne6yySL5?J65_D};O^1Wl(!yktJLD+|sOjp~8&d-lqG?8Z`} zJY+qzU)`zD&$zFHXr~?pF8dRTpHeIw?1Dx=WP z?JfM?v|91nC%=bLe@4W?gmmzNfz#u)H-1iq-zSmE(tnGV@AmoWOzwxM z{bWL(=ecuqOYZRelW-GoJJKnWXD7?;i|>c{yrN%x@agdu2^LYRB+u{R%!T~vV|6^T z{eGP1`9;rehb^-GF5p3=pRes$Uv9t3^4Fge@wooH*&VO_#*{z!ujYRN4O#krK{n23^euaX`+L&E=Vd+Na@Tmv zih7p|x$ZwqIL~raFMK%9^=HBPu2tmk6BGdFdVTrKYmMZ3qbd;oa=mST?cL>EZ>V43 zat_WF{eltvN-1A0{jcv61n|6$1^m5}rf*6zMYr2XzcW|($9xC)?iVVq`mgU3xZ#%v z{IAcxcTg9nUvQ#duz?={pNfRy&fh2C_$tpEFGSUcqVE%A;Jkb12VLdzu;M)Xv!j_R zB?03Nm6roJ&l}&LxxE)ZmqNH3IKKyNbi=ef`TGQ3;Mw?o!O(Yq>7bGH2Y_>Z7^1J- zN$zJtz_~sgnQ`z6_XCu_;bL@ss5vxyqWpaVGjQ%_ZXSH6k3LgWaGJL$>x&iqhOZsn z|6kuH;CMN}Up4k_+JAkYfcYNq=QSQ_|F7>8aD54Y|553_yW@VJ;QyIlt2nMdi}-Lq zV#aT|-BLf2iSra0s^>g^r|Dku9A(QfiS71xbp zmYi;)Hi>c|Jg`{c`H=gz>&a0X3Fr2%$9uPjcxSCjFc!Obfp{|ez(9`If3R<_jw zr+Vl>e7T+FgSTP0-l0nudiXE#mE}_i{-xm0Z|U{Xej93+{=18y~ytR^WOZDTieu4$k*PdF{NszNnrP9#Y`lXU-2l{3;H@ zEmuX{Y)Hq9Upj#6GU2&@i+r8Hmu}kJSR={jJSFO}2YBPZZ?)#~B6%au`&fUk!tLSi zDsoUc<|@ju06Zd)e70Nc=Vt$1IjsuVe~PnGUdV+#_*M92L~21wIK??j`c3uKmL;xh zoJe{7*|V{F(fdY8mJXTk?I+}1(Dzf%u64K_2)5um`wAZKE64-?!o3@Z;h*Y!*^I;O0WtI6leY}vmJ5=A8o8sOSlW?P0-V0 zySj9ug!6ZqbHTe=<z`?~D2EMC?)*e8;daO|eymzmf1-r5e=hK@pIhb7NI1vG4m%I-_^Y}c zAO7yNAM$_q%>RqyL-q%8p5wCBHFYV+g>e4vH0ux4G+mI(M}I^3Z9-b{@n&VTQu$;u zK1I}nFY5Gvk=Ny^KjiwK3p?!KrysdmSGgWf_GE(R0&i9G&-3`N>keL* zBE>6TVNbI`bN@}1@Iv4`KAn5&+)(-bZ)`8O*Yw|n{}u98YtziCs6+OT+iM2+$NSY9 z5%2wP%KB#qe{~(*>+#IW+Fbw0~e{o!>l=3Alf z(eL|okU9exEu7zJ5g4 z$5TQguKbt$^}=rBA0j@ye|tc7=kHQu`C9K8QU5~AMQVlITP^?SSfYS6iePeneVYAeL_d--gr+exD1sua)%0@{7Ksi}lF@@Vnlsu(XsnmT!b!z8*LHDf}KX zadIPrCzh|=4`Km--{spiOS_}_RG;05rvtp7+8({n`#vci%J_M}vzFT1C*FQfW&C{L z-%puQChmSuMf^hG@0pqRPQ3k|%J>=Yh=sqsqeotlmoZyeT z^}SEI-;?6!K>WPm{q@SupDJaDI7jN!E>Z8e|1AJ-$3K6xuZ(_)ONIE#{!n#S`1k#< z&p%cr&iJS7ug%~;HDl=Xs*3)a#y{?_<(5d}Ujh1U8{~_|Km3;Yk?{}b$#&{D`TM6& z!ddTJq{LUg$Hfl*t+%c(insqq`5u=X@YTmXP2=tVQNG8;5B}cu zr^?0K|C5Drl;d0oK3PolEb~ioozCONk8`J5)i&Wz1piCKhp+$6OkQYClyEz6UYEbq z^s|3767B-d^ZE4`c7G`E56T73>s6x?7iMdV<%_;A+5;8m_14ZuzItd%WGR8_2Y)}b z7w}FC+aKxHN#9l#KB(U7?+N?uTgCX1TS27z)|Ja*JBdpN@q@63`6kFewRLe9wp*}8 z{QTf&ftNb{-y1rcU_|sO>Zc35ZqL3|E8cSn%KDiL{x1g?f5_KKoImMT*3W$Kk34bZ zcD(obDeI^HZxNsFt=FtdHL~Vn`<3-G1N_#lRvj*3h~+Emrycy4?oZ#s_ZnG>`VD3M zB#h>NCd4%d@_wX*)AdY&^qcs$zM?+woD!c8nkSnf zN9V%v*6}=<$4#DB?jF0~$^V)sGd~;p{{6f8MV?=BexzU7@8*JE`}Zl0=78U$(-d#K_wnSzKR<%8hEbD~0PSs=rGAg5dS9{&#?9RSN1o4@V1WX@_G6HnCJOWjzRF#CLMjLLV9%mq+i+Jq$h}Yy!Asuf8~2ysK4g^ zM(!_Zo~MT&nULrHH5uyh5~uT#`)Sa__X)Be6YVMV z|KzJz3;#%-^7W(tXb8lRlf?{J)T-T?X$T%U!I z&iQVA8(BBoWgHqko_VA7X_fknSA_mSwQAj0>LWjt`Y4~s{G9bBinwt6%=j(qqH@c` zd0}UGJeVTvw6ziWYZo6so`87))o&gLES<$Vdzaoj{Ru{r7UL<8KRjM%V19PQadu$5 z{dwL>qMyu#9e$)O&RrjxXpE>W`a^MdfbRmY5b2DOXMT-yzpiLq)B-t^M#N>-@EU`X z^wIarsUBERPP|T)1wI);?MrDd$D_fzwV$btMW#mnA->YyT<9B>eCtEr*T_=D=XFZ9 zHy`{S{q8@^`)8O>_U0&_C(4tzl*RGv zRnF`3Bzvh|2k~33r*u98=k?lR|LDEWF2u)kT&$O|9H-oGB_U`=NuJ{vZU?#y={(i* z{I}6>Y!dBYMzs!=SQp`ZpUe%p3#(sBi(JHnl@jj7dGmXsJ^k?Qy=z4_gv-sQ=nn!? z{^YL`CtIn!L*S)joywpqjtBKqCh2$Bj-qu+{@!nP(>jiUTlQ=wec}3{%L1R*9e6$K z*};c0IflfggYtJO?9P_*qx#0r39vri$GdO%LyA>E(H|@IQ9jg<om>VMzOGaB-`0hO0e zVP^*TEbm_@`d`+c^8I7gSwH!qloxX0_nt#fHqsnPFZtn>ep5YkbrJS=Bn9E4X{&n^ z-$}dXrT?iO7J#3-Myy}(y3c_DpJnMIEMkg-_@+667kp2osuU52kVQ8o*~3hU-&y3( z>$_&~AL`p=QHnd3uUGJG;Gej8rB13dmLKdS^jqH-_00|bhJja_mvF@Ljk83*!uI&U zzvS)OIn5T!S1I@*)?Z-QUD6uMx5FORZ%h^OskLXt$E7T>{7ePk3VyS(XB!&Kv3!%l zUnlsPi_5%F+8E2%EA)H8*WCK{u`-5Oe(;&-@+ttoYqwEn%0|;8{ZfIVo*PO;_Xj4c z(8t$TH@w?tsC_~awIdt&{NA%6U;o)YQNo?T`Td!B`@guXk#G-ieoxh*M<=gMl5ihz zzRrDr=rjGa5?%nD?>D`C$+})A;i@#@53lQ;oBBt0zWyZpjllUjyz$#VUrd(dEx`FY zdVQmL<5MKu2AtRR4$U-NNR@CWaGpQ>Y%jB=L@}<;=_%s-G&&DQ>l3NR2bF213Ln(| z^}Pk&5qQT-ZHBKe7-wWWqmRI!0j{g~+nN#?fBp?T$&dEP<#+hEi~HpAF_skZ;rJbF z*RrluK5B1Yp}#Zq&wjDWoKcM|!#ICcmcY9LKh`d7;QiE6dkCj-%?bT>+?TWY#dY+m zzQ+@|oQX>Z@ofse2frUmypXB&5v%whz6!VnX#nXTUABC~^?)UaUx4ypdsL-_{|CDo zR&l+M`91~T4E{^s)lhRiVLsI-5BN6lYG;JbrTGLSlE0$Ac7u1X)att>y{xI2uk5eA z;Q!(E-z?>c!&mgb1>irmuXYWCJC?8PuMGwfk4txluPN<}Nu#u3X` z_SX*ZPae8ArmQWNuk5cq;0Is#I?GvO`F2JB7y$oFhaDN^EwTJe1z%NK_?xU7*S&%{ zmTyw{YX-kte|x=(##p{yq2C7n=UMkkq#I)S%Kq97e)G3$mZ%g>k6ec<`)i`me8qx( z&NznU^SKO#Jnuth`SBxPEP5A7 zxE*MGHKXM(ZaME3+Qs}U2l}{Qd`vTFX9D6w?S%Isv;I8rhv+{`L|4P=!uE#OTY={z z9g~|>81^D^(0okk4*@h^&H`UwR>X&8O!&?I6QAbG7MvII#rr?JGlai<9WeA{<9}sY z;!|9Winux@eH1rSYoW)8b)Vx?iocFcap84>|1H1pa{|yGLVEPm?B*Ol(x?1Rr)r3p z*Zy5*O&499`l|d+r=^^T+tb!{56*Kvc)6DPA9}9> z9r672f!{LW%7#=yEBZ_2tcOIWM_T5U5WgZcqEET+ApN$uPwsEN;wG1Y$X)bL`idehCZrjS9{P^!H`(X; zB)Yv9ej~0+20wi8yEyl&W8Mpr4ZZd5zwtI-cgp!^0nbIc_SZMhbA6}$?Wtnk#rvUM z)kM2}XWy;VR3mE=XKzkmq_{h~IKurFL$pB>WgaiUIX`8jGgr5 zCynRXt4zAGR<fc|6}Z`1Dm?Of9fe3Ja}M885TTv z&=ng2HYgsvc!mZKUOWs79vD(QFb2hg7hUk;!A5}r8AA#~ez`fH6J8$u@g;xs)B8T> zoO|!N=gPa!!cjjFhw}E-LQYZbN{z2QC(Z3^fV{PI5#zT!CvAazx@^xTe#>*x4#=A~ zF4d&=oHVzuG|ol8(4yXM=yShN`ghCo= zU0sDr|Hy44cqi=H!56!gZLD;^H34?@^-2H5&BHsmOhVty<;h3o4{2A-dy_By1aAkg z0e`>Ux+Ux%(Jo1{d0Y=Uu3yR=8Yj7ahGI8vas7l}<@%)O-N%O=3(zjH>-A%Bf+Q`< zks>RHxi9S_2z#R6#;l-rG2%VSdR&id+oX{um2oy)CzDs^C;!-UYJBfq6L$G0?5kz+ zI>^_LzjmAb#qy%w^70B!#8Wcr6$^cCYa7zsc0yjnlLN;|-~0U-*>@rN`f2Q#fi9`8 zkQaV)wBH0@Em;tJ@+;~m zanM`!!`e^0UJyLL2QwaglM>4pN$15x9Orqhakn22gh}k{s*?R=$c@@|t6{i=k9!wb zzUf8&{yw$xMHM7Jj7qq3Hns9agTG+U+e%u#SRCi_t#6nvr?h`@{48`?*qoaC_Mxx2$BYvr>O>{!u7@ z-73G2OD+E-=-(eXcZD?n6j}bQpO1JT&7a#tU5M(xY2>h#()<&kuLB>~vQnC_wMPu( z3NIO}{#tvOA@}CztJ$ROp+kQ0;C~;~d>)_2i1tiuO#PnQzgejQ-|?8@>tE1g`_t#7 zKO(iSEKK#Z4I?|%+Sk3FT6^>OQpnyVSUUc2|BQy6Hc1Ws=6OZrA1kxJGOSknFiAWq zao=qmJ?ls#O+b9?jnSMo{sVyWey2>lb2??0F3pDfG2dd;j2rTKGvD~pgH8f7ha zNSc2<^rOJHiqAJB0_F4i`7Mu$jJyWv)2;g;1%6&X1gX()VqquU`+F^7c17{`BSNh> z&TZG!x&5|8Kg4&|x2q-Q2+Il13(Ics*?{+!Dx+94_0TDAnIN zg5n_Rf@&(yBR>7fG|p=w_k3Ob<5E8xaNIhY^skh>cuMML56W+X+**D1yh`{{*mr@q zf=@Vd!~fnrA$Bm_x!`e&ZG#dIY$SqjfakI3au>aUUS56nJFZGWqit5khyKT#V zPFlW{F|S+ubQ1qXAue3t+ZFG+JiUZZ#5mvq-*KWgIsQ(6<5wFV?&9lC+SwV7!t0~ zPJCVR*R2b)1RDiQ>tVj1gvZMi*zbM*?>iv|lHhH-P@s+wv42>ZP!AIjb z=T~;b@~dGIJ{G(+n$BnXnce?}OZYhOiI1rsd7G4Z5&>TLncpvHJWYH&l^`xIN-MMADyFM|1n~I4F3rj!r^5#X&y=iU~+d<;6PMh2ug@ z#7%N`**dirJ#Q&^-~In3s2;rk%=Q@NdwW99n@_kFdLk|Ik?YIfdnhl5&=c=HG{X+( z$7o$o>oJ>*7kd2jmLtp|D~BEZg!i*l2S3+W_?damN7xd6R+J<^SPzjr`&onIQhDKL z9gYiqQGb){z1sh4zk=TnpRL@0D5Y%R5b+~Fud^Y)86&rPB1NW>pQx8Se?g0SnW2{m z5cPHbsZWfb$HKOSRw5o1;%O74|HYFFXBk9MR?AELD52+`bi9Uj+;NzUHB+%H#2yS ziy?_?Z*aSbeqminc0H469chF77{gs-YVTd-=O1{#Cjs&WtIU2E=AFN!^_BKJmQRL! z{Tm|`;yn*?`7fS-C`e_Z=eKiuD+@kEx2K@$JkAkY4* zx;fXzV4cssqJ8}S=limX_aA*f2mUE~ zBaz3nXZkH{|p_H>Y|KEkn4(vL%<4T160OZ{e(G@iJ;T%O=h|E-gj zHy(DGZ@O^tc4>Ke9Od#RLjJ&?yYHq}-Z=2dz=;P|_m`A6OkJMp%l>~9d0{w@8=}53 zIFDohXK3?F`w*-feLVD;KQgD(6Y2YS_`Wmdr{3a%Xu(Q61Uwtdu&oV=f zzZ?AMx6zZrTofn#*B9@&502%NpjTpQR#mu@B?*PR8TZvCKu%eK{1I{YXrl3o(+M;5jZ5VW(}m zyeC2>JnOT+56@H&m-;&yddiAa&x3;`5=3N8_Lu51h5~!|Vu&ej<*?z)yzt4?8Kri~el> zjryMr^-PBRjuVf!q;j8fxE1#s^L@U`O5~STDFbb(+@~CFlF92Je{%DK{i)oi9Ik~t z`!g2uT_UFpN{@0Y@Dt@%$?V%8zxi~0Vk-A3hr93`1D8J$^0{<|EE)A|na~$si1QT4 z&3ByWp_0sJu{{3h$Pd>e3lz>I;iGY!=d<(6Prc>m{)GKl@EoT#CuS_31^S|X^7$?f z@)O<^+{(}SajAXsdjjW=c*qyLRU=Y7?uHvE!d~SmcYE{m$5MHDJw1>wcmDOisXa%n=t_R)^C?Xg@{6$PZRb#%ns|PW zI^p5caXimS+kwmXwfcy-F~PnSc>m_~Zd?z+J8_)j?rP0{mPwzZW}e5TWd)jC=5>}= zKiIUF_DOsnH1*cu;({J0A`V{uNz_O9KXDb+$GC-%?~|TaWnh!AROSJ*OkQ7={B!)# z(>&pJVfFLRXCLDd+c!b}1NpxBPKg(rD!-Kf;<~2`dUMTlD@0m8 zmqq+1+DCrfQ&Ek|-(_vd-_w}Bl$T%k)I$Do!8uvd8Uy7;dnu5=5poS@Eh?2RmgGeK zF|zBZR>*x^nSVrjtl!vbYUOo6epI#QBQr#^^6hrNoo%oG)9PssB)#PUYSf2{SUTW0S#B>f3_dH=LRJ}Elq z#w<#yG+lq?{wW<-#5iO?J)F?zama(TR9=ij${GRv+P}Ww=e{DUEIARRqWrz(^p87y zzZrk8r0LZE1_$c{%PHj5>v8@bNBcUl$gkwi9wT|)XDuP0g!f#l@m^*dGJ^^1l4T-Da&-%>vtw_DX^6mk4>$&SJfi zf;6`;A6MhJy7uSx7V^Fq;=IasqD}C_a$wYC?6fm6 z|AdzAj?(?31jzHaVk^D3iez0ArnwrZ|0Hd!n#Wb)-xTO`zdbZ>=q~BLWDu)Q-}3lU*CRjF?U!|V zYTvQo>xLX(I>=8Qr0tyA^&@$F#X>$&yCUps*N-^9Y>>Z@zj!Ng{YV;LqQ7!{Nso(l zfDP@M2z~CKDM(A@#X3M$|MNH?{Lb+fU6%UYz|O9>99N>BnMMX)7c)SAOS`M1Qk$nu zBS@a#*J^_N-6h?}rZ!Kr-_&C$zD-$4zh)`ThhR-$oQU!`a2{-jT^De}&2}Hdznmxi z{n)jJ)+dS|sQw$KZO)k5KBrOEkF}5&B@uBX&)?ROt|!^=Elo%zfB$tt&ffxi{|*F@Zha&oO9B>)LxUH5P_r^zX(h7=; zj1ZbP_3GMw)r+1LNnd4Q zYd&YGP`!`#^)D-qySNAvz!h#eC9RadH*QwzspO9NO-+WKWun%6<*(n_B4X$ zd9&xJ4pCteeG7Q*x3gN+AieoJ4VcCaW_rW|b-zHmBxI|W|*K~CuV<8eyU zzCB9J9Ekb_xxxG6F`wtt3sb(M;DZ%EQvDx@1KwX~>8l;8O?&f)_+OOYf_P*9^thO{ zkfi>>3D?NKT)vU-2UUn_lKT|&gN(4x<-0KbdX3dR4<<2h0ng=|v){VxeU9>v!3W#H zKNJVNzbxAqSNnK;>j&|_7$=BPGcZH z8GwQp<7})X?JcK&zlhg;Jf0L97Lkklr_dEYpM6-@zR ze&KcFx8>)ZFJWKVjOw#4sCq+R2lSQ4dp!=v`8`I}57ubI^OEQ{F*3f>wB>tvjV5@r zjQ_d$<6OL65WG#sFZ{uNJ;LV=ipvD>JZ{96{U?#f)70vl1o@7dITz*QsBfJp^RLKC ztVtxf{$bA=Ov>MD^DI5AUnhITH4DicqBjcDY^o{fc_XPp|%aq-YFoe^G7` zZ}PYh$3?tZ&|XI9^ZjWyq@{L5yg6`O=!^RBciXHE@{9AK&Bp5>unMmufkAM9*Q>yPlep<+F%z3s#xL)M$n_nX2`yK|!W#9HsiHI-9_XzpE zhY9k1AHMFw_g$0q)a~0LKS=T4AZ{0_yxhJE@=M1g9rJY(7WSg(uLfCvRkS332r=Ow z*F)+D?B9`lm*kiF#{hZuk3MI%wCo?ReyBZX;CL{0Vtb9SEq=njmGi@WJ7aDqlnc`P zXdmwY&+Dn)VcL{n3GV{W>*v~Kf9e$?;XU9v-ZQp;H&fdFCh)3ORPPe~TIY+9=*JJH zxZ(KGk6F21s&9ZE$It6+**8l4V*=0qOLr<=8;O6yl9S0lyxwd*Jfy$0ehJubgZK8kkk70|MaqO46~3RCcatWNeJ;NTa)aA9?IU0Rhkv|L=FGf_VJWU!eiq=$L4bYaZdqZh`^f=D- z`LOI!S6=rC`zGXTgxupRL(fO*sf2>J;5f%?t7+X@r;+eh_|p!#>g8s1PAlQH;GN+2 z>H3dM2R=1_xgl5jO!1HDzZ{RgXm3Rus{cPnMuhQm5>$HMc=SbkXd!PrS8sM|&r8VT z$q4yYi%R9dw8G|n^TZe9k(c$YE6`7^(02lbvRH2>Nz%g4+&%^ywRgwOC8ggr^{+?y zettfW81zbciu)HAO!OlUzTf4-cdMe>lAn5)KRhLs>pc+;$SWZi1MKg)evbE>r1trG z9e;N$4)WQTS9vV1_XM%97ll7e7`OSpj0DIFF%bvy@^ZYL&;CjmtPxV5e?nefUS&I~ z-|9IjcHXC94IwWtuMYAHf89~SyGjW7iSp{hsU5f;v5*&nsg;-8ui?&1m%pXF39#4s zLcv_$Qr=|9@A$9ItJKPCPz9D(-Jbj*$}840(MWTB__z&rVKX(_<7?z!X`QH^;<;TOgbNrn?aa}^z7co!l4?Un*WcGkH>f2UHran*eg8y zdKKR1WCbA~C6m{5AU_=Kt*XWAR+bm-Y?ZAi43HNx-hLTuT}|`pocpDH?@8M8VoBP6 z5_b9CqwD3p-&rR6y#805p49cz+wm`<@BMx-@x1=OKlsu`Rcw=g*uEP)`*UlV$yM?y z#_|41m~#j1dl_&af0aDD6S=>Oal;N?(~m7n;{b=}mZdjIv9G`;ML(d4j zI-_QqP|194UQ6|7|JNH=t%USE(+)i@U-=d#y9eYCp7XEy&x7x!_TAvQoH@of+7Kqm zUty$rasS$HIaxeh!gKw3Ju*IXlLoN`)JX=VU~ERpAm8; zZfD;nT`#dduV)TC)K?79hn^jnr_uH>p67-A7@7Z$nD6_qBM9CNy_oUTf2Zz_S|RnX zq7&7h%kLgNccaw58t_~`clUZ#r2b|9@c!6;wd=2!u4jzUXaBy)vM*?e|jzrovqhQi}2OZ*Y4sS-F&4Vb)cxK!T*J+99+{q8|QlJ<6iS9K=8 z{L}ntMd^CU34dzAH(Fmhi*!B2ab{Ue*9)G#ySFY_PbCoT!TvHqzrVR^BWZhEah%(u z=amKb*$>iqazHNg^+sw*{li>1ZbUg744p7hT7CuU$N7)koTHUAe^nQ%H^+PSvpKEO z{JH$xo`V{!91^VhTt5T!*?ybh$v?6E)Y{tw`Fqo6mF2i1Yt-Ia@K)fBrNy&L>&xxQ z<@L->Y8E8%w-b79;HdvBccuRDz+Z~4RPSkNQWi+tQ-kAN-@9+xX{7601N8Nf+gJ3r zyS%>j?GIpFumCk^7bE1`zHe1Ye19p3EA2($C;2>Pf&9zFpVp_%rEM0hipDf9`yM= zH6kB5FYJhY5i9JNf1~k&=Q9V6OZ_MIMG^z@_3mdDrS$;cPx9{i>%P1$67xFWzo6_+ z_0T@2eWBO;^5;u!-N5^)yk3riUg&p8#lp}ZMA^kp*q5&lV<6wd)S+Q&_t&{(>)ANS z3wvT5h$m^hh!;}L1cNymM45Ap-AlRM=aT8R6n z$Ug=4b&yL~J+`m({usVLMfZsOm~iT^0@CuCp~wAd>G_-rY58Kn+knqr#~$VTTSWih z^}Gu0lmNL|1rH4V+H-r{zDba;>KM@KYtQX*`zm9}AG3PDY8mNUJ&Bf}pD2&KeRYt( zS8sc()Slbp_Lau1i1P&aH5U3D=QgCJ@*>V1I4(-!Z5RLb)xs!ShH3x2xKeCmO_3CF z=z+ZI7VQi0b;0G?3Jy$V|0BYEndCe-A>WhyP{X=t1COJ~%4c7Gy+#lDNwc2hO>O_r zi0i3*z0(Bwj$L0ANNxX5etpLd`H!`J?2_94pZxlc3-U$u<AFzTfuX`?J>E_)-Vb0 z0MGrVU)6^D!$0%>>zV&4=r^y&{N3AMU&|m;qI{Y%)E~M0H8&OgOWHRXZ(&>f zMEPBiw?ppC&U`H*j6T|zzdXKOkjq;yUxU=XqbQGW59G~}@3KVd$u9pD^^?c9rVsh6 z#{ON_6oexLo| z<=%!O4@MrJ`6y!nJWaomFYzxpmI&$pflKFkfC=dp&D(ya65@B0Z}(Vyz4#{Go7Vzy_L zo*&xHf!D__mRO%RSWo)Wc47N^*qavdt{Sf=NZME4Fb#Mk@Z7Wt&7|uJD~|KJL-GBG zXVUX^cM4sXazJi+rI0$(^K}=FGoP;A6*bR0qQ3E&F`q&1Sc&DMl-~8X_z7NRB7gAs zdT)8L8hl@Z;B8u3uWBK8r+U>=-0!9KIe+!zJT7VZOfvhU(yX~HEuR6r6&Unm`HE># zKGCn_?|E}T?kC3|71L>a)$srE$)o-GIY<}e>x}MHFnucPRQdg=ieJbd4?e`wB;vO& z{N?@rYN^0}tA)G}^ZFww8Sk5nt4DtSwQshl`oH`a4nEWZc_;1{o0s-gB4;7|X$Q~s z3>h<`VY<)$@Q(`|f9~P5pY?ofx%we`wnQlGas0VqcX%PwD(U&HY5>)j=ihNj@3u?N zH=TPZ{O$u)CdkDNjrK^-C#^Wn{G@KTC-FQa z?DO?o2jm)mmm^wwy~Ks%mc3NYtBtnI=IbS*zv@wb?(ZJRM?HP=i2cf56Zxg=COfKu zjoY%k_Eird(cWeJ#-A@}5r9cOcg{wes2_UnpeU zAKdR!E3XrBn;m)faQ_kIHR8Aj_~+^6Su#q>>qK0r22p+A&e+tAzf&ai`T9D?WAdIG z57}>mH$ac|vtOTmN2(uRi}r;~kgH}0&YMY+zb7~O+kk%hqFCLP((*f?$MyK5wYG}1 z{E867C-f^^uhW$MB+BQ3z8>`t|MaY;w7pb=sovbK#r2hzvwbn1$m56i6(1DrIWUMD z0x0t1{YeAt*2%k4DV<*|IL>xXq`mIqIo0QHjQ3i^X}Y9-bEW;w34K4Geq(uQf8+k@ z=KL2NnkhgRhH6Zv!eY9M#B{lp;e=|b<$3-;< za@?@nM1FRZ(*n7l9(`9(+TR>F&iyf8hKISN?dJl|{dU}*<-NH5gnd&{iVyDp`zEd! z$?Yck8?UpN=XUx3+E+D{{HFyjsM}%^w{L3p{#X5tuwwys-Vu6>>z|sv|22L&V8;bC zj60Yt^%wUyZpTlvDrMpJ6aLbeseUfRU)ZRvYxw%I;JLqP;P6P zs+-il1w6;uA5RV~l-LiA#{A0jW6wXv&y>cC6Z+g5)PnC4()ejs32(r0o?q(K4Ih_H!dszlf?V*kJZJg4O2S`S@K*4y zF{gjYA<>VjK|$zILVPXxNz@3PV)VL zL8=i{Z@%7`XXf--->*owUijEsz921lzTTMJ=kdzvwdJEA;t3)`4@bEf$>k3I902bG$E5>+g$th@ar~ z!)X1-@xEx-%Wc6%AMM*8;PFj|^BoWD4YI}?LJTCwe}z3>FRDh8U(Wwna3=8qbiv<7$gK{_u9l7$JZ~|7{CW9c=B495x1VA=#dFzu@zp|%oD-oaKewL? z`KjvJ4odgi6r-trykGZ1)wvn(JNf*J^|A(XU9WB~E7@-g)8ja|-__h7az&sVLZAI_ zgxvfVg_kNNJo}&HXYrFpVIlg@<+ni34y=?vJS-CWsrlatxvPiUpM5A zHt(`c+Me7$9PF<##a$3mMvbWUm_$}&h#BuhIq5hL~Dm_{7^1-^z zG!F21bhJ^S`3(vm_3e{*`5-&=c|2-q8FAyV<$7^pLGVuSJRW@?+rPq=YcE%T4|ap^ zPgyETL_O_3??lg2tgpsBd(5wo zf;FFcH}p8Z{`~9cDrtN z^Y=@4UD!T8$ojc_7U*$&C~IX~9}GUV{%(i-^I>CZhgirC{}uk={_cd_`=EaZheA&9 z9vpYzzVysPn{*A6@H}3t#*sgaYl@r=m+)E~=kiW;|8_Y-!n3~&kSmyF*BYgS=l;(7 z@0(s``YFVy@cl&jOwh9e+toZgG15YOYW>{-xmM?mWz(2Qj{gdK+}~Z0GcUjNJT2s; z{x!lcit$wMK1GL_(;3+kq0hgN(?HI=xJYDr$O+zn+-U`3w#3jzdJnK zwaUW>s=2wjoGq`c`bMzZ>sevHe!DBYxmi{ z0laSj^B%O7*;C%otEf*u=qvljvHd?cp74WL*7vi*-kf$vF4ehM^|UxB{Omw~=XrbP z`c@X{eJngKBtiepie_zteYM0qfa5&xoeLV&g4aL7z83MqPWeEl^jeA~4q(Hvwe0}KPb}Jo&}Fy4TYTGqj8+ax!#%c zR|=ExJg&q-PM>t}Zn%Vx!*MR}gDZdk6CvSwT#1KV@g{5MC?!0PEBqbk3!P6keO!bVp`_;iCA6KS> zUj)x_%kM3_7}>K@ko~iLE88DQ<6F=5&5s3xm-?0C)&cp=n-`u5Nu`}QZe5W3dvu%q zp_1|_rcix2ZbttytVfuH=eX5CE@sHm$Z!d-$8oOjRNK}^5fYxi>tTdk9o6nNN(s;7 z80)uNw|HBS;j=$@9J52eSdsdrf+f5Y$9X=VR;bL95YuOU3wSrM_;1Z3BPIDOrlLLJ z@8CJ->vOz|_R@goxchT$SV?Jno8VVHk!{Y$gRrrn}*|;N{jeI zTv{NPE4J~9jF!*!ao{-f8zN&oD)1t|1dQuy^LGQlsLpO7~}p4WFC$bZOq zuzF@AOA-oyn0S7kMt(a|_3Z5|kQ4S4SWohKpaF8%7UkHH+V`pXe1rR&3Gx>cJA5bq zKDEf-g7v%|a_Y@>&t}(C`F!=k`6cgpENj6+Om4*O+G&t<<-ls$5v>Es-bX~%zWn(7*$z3UbKAbOdXf<3;c=PyaWi6vOL?AmjX3|iFz4O|>G_Ci29=lj zf;R?am7b4qeYKEFQ@v%GG{(>Q8*tnX`&o8oJ;mn(snyp6`I()6KAFxycKENfK32%p zdYk2SddLZT96uiR2jm97p7J7to-GjydoIYiA@|RtD#;lkCwSG&!0|w{$@}@&&%FP9 zasy0vE8g6*<+tPaL{jMM5&uSD%YNC@N&RbreFfIhxeo1*OU=Km|K6DIfmGii(>H&( zu~n+i?Q6jLZMk{wd8LI4E6V4AKJ(WiKGl}4tGIntv&at#hQe#pNc6QhZiW5L2TEm3 z3qG~>H9&sd(pz2AnW!B6SCoh2)daZ#Yw|Wu4>@W3x=?OAmG@N|0* zNaq{&uL*LO!kfR6&NsY{IHzMto#)co&)T+pU?S8D4nE#@Z= z`%>XswbZZ)HrUqok7C${LbsV^7n^sm&Oav@2tP-{M$)E`p@=xezzc> zTDAsxf+f5i$N7BuZN>ZvAx4GoC)(2p-U;kEb;nN}kAhcLru}lBf5R7)S}*MnieIUI z%x{@_<+8LtXu$LQ-!e_scGCK}k*^+dnbQp)z<&0X563y4KDGHHTCGdA-5ohZFKozE|zeWF))%SCmhMcK1N8aF55)Jnsv8 z2J|PMmo#(8Uric+r^$kGnC%I99*=oG*F*k#&KFm+>RFOdg-(QgDePK_J z@tUuv*dZ5O&bWuKo3K@3Ps8&7mL+7$I+Xm~E496GNgR?qieRUn6L7-;MDX z%GU~gCs6R>e!V0~+FMTl{pb3ebbTc8S318KRr6_hurl!Z1K<6CxF3(7r&P|P{3w6# z`^@paFe~ik@=Sdm93@zq2VHpISPb;`#FnZUD&bi_K7{PvOL5$g>YJfw1Mb$3t`P=( z;dc|t&-WE3Ku}yX9<*Jc}5}6KW{$aj(~hVzo$^Y zf%b(P9^Ai#uj`0-aIdH1?7tM~|2HY#8meK-ghHOY`kq2u#}6ZyDqqC3caO7!M+xlH+2WwB4lpkoZ2@ZU;u0L*Qp$d!t{+duX4J-!D6U zaEAK9TDD9mS3|)Rz`h1Fd5!HkDS7+~cOp!jHqP!ibpXXGUJKVp7{TS%; zx}n*S^1p_{Z-Uo>Hv_AM_8l*Meumde##+=*Yirt94bqdpg+4!DlK}lC_SeIuti9>} zO@7}G-yc=t*`oPUU6xl=36wX$Uhm!0%)Cb_WW`U6Q>yO*$9+p+{^9cclXg>l{Qhxm zm2_W@li~9GU9cC~Gv|@?l&$}-@4k6i{(=;Kb8tD9l0W#pL|UY!br*h%#&Mx9;x(=) zl`{s<1Kg}sZy4){dfR2s?Z(OUl~IBE+j_?Q_gUY2AG}Qe*0Dx+Mc(2k@=t`lWT4eO zdn)^1)LWjv&=d8JhrDtb#se$0PZZKz1|cu%t;ccF4~dY!??Z>@u=}sxs0|fDlArK{ zQ?~A~NbHGv#Q#9!u`-<2aZAS)Yn0~mxc$ZZOI*Yhev1~z zpNPE0PvoBfdr82)eNJqUwzoWgp(pBXgM11wx;FJ+wLSHEYjK?Owb)3W<9zRg0na{{ zJ4E4@wXaF0uUHtUUu^qN??3AYhw6U}^xOXI)hCO*#ZT1R1$#X1=RWiNS&$??VrBL{ zkk9EptY!a@HL~XbuUbL%zh0@no5xHMKl1trUExP7^z_hU9V60QCm}ETjTy&9TJ!@& z52`1he?;}BcqiVwenHx{f!1l2Cw#h{UME;8cM|OJ{HxSkie&&VUGLd?k=+!?zp8ux zW=5Q6kTp>s@AIa!sXWS4gzA;#j}`Z}SXEy+--zi+_M;&`GG)N|Ov=FXE#XJ5uhcKX zj|nK38T#zUc%-HB!jDcI7iAagGPRQ8$#jnV#MfCyl{j6QpL>whGlIVprudEO$MQGE zT|XYCXGua~pTApW{EPgeg`Vro@;&_A3u_5^Ra5c@pLZA`KXB!{B@voHzX*Bx_-Tdw zloi|hD!p+nt-p|$e=o)fc~#Vbv#EWDKqHGY59CFeMSpUxrFyX+o@Y1I3W}i`3Ep;w z#$)DR7rVAr${SaaAC1LGZq>W%3xXy37VuGc4_BYQ6OQqB4TXI>c#h+sqGe8pO7xwq zkLy>~toaH`zdNl5?`FBA4AuF&(_Vl1zYE9htyoRv{giXkfBd}wsx9>cd3$Rh-*R14 zE~Sno359)mdmAACw$l}7q_>~R+V6|`%L4fqeP16>qyAD}-rf$#+uCQWo;HU1Ueu6&tGu0aMhg4qlvnU)FHT80@RTw-OoueskqAi3jpc3yHaspKtSF{UA&V={% zJMENqY#`KaB#hY&+(Vdfgiwp~sFahGR-YzR;r*O(_%4U@Ivr2q`^FwX?g^n8sPRxb z`6Z#@6`|%MAnnq~Cd~94qX~ie z81*xFU|d^DyV~J+M?y_ELURwonEr&;!G!S^Lf1ILsJVp3`GnDn3H57`UPoxh{!8*E zN^7?eCT=4%{XwY1ecz_Nl(y|7OgRcX20TuvKS8KGOK5Tt+RlN$NtpD2(EJx+!b4y( zp&jp?OZbP3JAOb;6_?gz+^Ajrh)XB2ZNy{5V4WY(mFMLi2CHRfJA_ zMYU<9ZV+`VcDn5$XpbJ&4df zm@sh+q18fY980L11e{E$m`a!eG)<#)63{i9(&`0-swISRO9>6jfGdF57f%Gn{zk`j zs|Y>7=(UuNUQg%*#yTh+yOmJ0i_im%*-dG?lTdk>&~%hA3FtUWY1yM%^& zgo!}MU*O*odVsnR+E;d^!~Sx1LWi0#J}03i7ojdUp(!7stq7r}EMY=9LRBTCs}P#1 z5+(s1)hL} z6Sg3|6}XKsC4tbsn=p9~(s+-l*-7cdLxiehgfYhn^(P2*XOPBse(d<}km(#9k2+6i z#CMGnE>l{OL}&&&ZcsW7*K<5>N;~cms_zpf1Fe5i+WL?%@hM^aYeLr>98V$Cza><@ zBQyb%fSUJoJmnLiCW!VKY(P^mrIUfiFiJ;-6S^Y6=O)w?B#bFU7+r+W4U8^9X>BRO zIJ}R;8AEAZTS7}aLPL8(WnV%?Kf(mOcg`||(#b&GC`y|~6DEyA8sBM+pGIlLT<{AB zEei>CiwLzV2(9si@f!)FHxW8E6DFP^OmY$Gu}_n7fzp~Qgz6+h({;iWp!PPU&G!iH z4+xY0B2+yB|CmsV_cbSZD6Rj8FzF4U;yqz3&>2MMzq(*TJJ1|LX-ha^bOfPZNvMn@ zbOEC>Q`(e;FeV!?JE1-&(s>B2c?py95xVmeCTIu~ixDbH5XJ&MoGwYn^`!`-$`Cp# z6Y6RZ#@8m)*C#Ya6DBnv)HEWDGZ31Z6S{vQOlgC3dqPV$90$5%DIMLHP>=gXQgDBU z1=rn^fl6GT(&KuI8P^|7*oTkBzO)hhtMR77aA3#I{mtFF zQo_5>6y&T==ktR+Q;oaYO%h#?x zOp`t=UB6yJM(`#a=jV4e6q+2FYxZw0=B?oQ`JF){I}KT=A6lGw2Y4&W+jn-JAL?$V z>WOl4JsG*a15Mq!bkqtfR1O#Hcz{#R?L5CHqO)%oN0d{YKz?98yE1b7Ht1{WBV@!+lta0T{1OFxd-}sF?bN8*;DZe~?zQRr-N^Fvw+tsX{0%@P<4TlYSl1~utq`l-3kD*X}VvBI7M=xpBk^*Qb8x@?d4 z@ffj9r|7{Cgn9*q9XIq9yQzLB^^f9yU9xngup{^=9Ot->86Q-jXp@H@nU4m~aqXx* z=tJ5f5vQ1s1iA89H;&oppW`gdi?jA6BBm(-gPZ_k2)|O z;uEVnqd)z|{nY;*POk65iI;T)&V>1fO`&hh6{xR_9$KT-4?p|f;~@Ou-CFnk7v zx1z&6e>>{;Q@yzSi~1hRbMah6X}0gc`$U;vcwy#iP0fM7F|TPGn1A7(wnF3jC4A4k zwqYRu^lY&eM@GM_&%8M=@f`OvKjwYb^h5kM=563P|HXqnCI3k?#5Wv%OI%AY=?H(b zJu`1fGgLBkY;gt!Gu6S^Izxk> z1LJLzr_;72f9~@=zbwiZE8`dBSy#7P$yGgBKdvmi*VhF0+h?BjpQbPKuH>b` zGntPs5Lmx5`3knzR{buTc?ZTl?oV%9h4s1Kx=u#sU9xd8@!jzQ83$#$CFeO_YE8Lb z^>xL0U+~=ijjF#6Y4quXZ}=4TXZzg#y6(qLlo3}5J@{d>)-KXk;^%l>tQQWNN(@F~}?<(U2ZRMyu<2lAVq6e+lFaBcrO$s-%j zx-HzbzgeBe{_&7`Zl92*p7J$n9f)H4*2970XORe%!9PAQ&*h6qS9M#q ztZkOFzTs$K{co&$bbi;u58IiK$r@VS)NR z+79TMq4Ge#|1_Nf`I++y<{xsZKsL6o#eB^Dqg=(bRc!8${`h5{`+wSYiyCgsbm0u^ zJ5YY+OPB31;g@||W-y;3t6z~N6)%kYy^w$WVxIf=<&wWHuXjJz?;qy5f8QQEwCw&* zv18@-x%|^xKK#M8Zqy(-&*j^0E&oT=gGJ{suad>bjJlT|6)cjiDf7w_f&Sauz32MP zx0g?3-q|IPZyi?U)ZuLd&&zp^kBpsWD+}pfbnNMjEXum|| z4~43q__Md1XZv@1F1RwKO3h!GcggJU`}p?m-b`l}F>h)eX#d(W>%^CBqaVn5wtruL zUfXM0jE8w`Vqp2J{`_Wfr|I6WB6)ve{B}eI+TZKR`)Nm6#VqENb%DIIXsI)ii*vN~ z^O=a}_WQNpA6xo_)a}5$Nj84`)$y;#otlq6#JsM0p#G8MUCUGjJNx@r40xVDr}WgU zU$c3=e|}(|>tC~B=M{>GW5rz1o#H#+_$GUj6G^E(E9{;7vrN|R4_oH==JJ(Iy?k!i8`?Kx$4on$`_^CI zR6fZ@fwX+uQ&is@cUSBwcd_O4Z!RD9oBH;!*U-{^kO z_A0JjY5#c7Jg*1my>S0s>RR2ta{Igf6&5yawYDj~A{^vB{`FFHaA15jo43~1$acm%RM2>0mGNnv9h4($ z?f8!Q_@aUOHnWuj1{Qk2+6&V*UHO zZ(P6G($U7x%hqMNZ{GR4+_Tsfa-RG7s4926es}DagZVhv=XFTljUDRF?AEHCoac2# z`;{SG$IYwhl=Hk!*wZBAHf8nE{&9fq^Sqya^?>wGOAXH}*XMcsm?l@pjd@>glk+?; zA6UI_K!H!~{p)hJ&+}}(NykkKrq2I@=W*=9k3}A8hdxh`+vjoYk-k?gYu~PyLa9>;F&&+uounb*e3 zdG5zoZVj8i)Ya(I>GJR$hNZq$s^C31&i(z-?wjYv z9{a^VAFD25Jiv9r(kc7f_So=dG?!Bgp8M;_v_Ci!vwkYhyn*#`UA247&2Q7~J(-Pp z6L=m^{!;gB+iFYugUnmO^LVoK(#;mye6Rie!~veilYCjHwwqGqfq%Ynf#>oC4X!)v zMv!qo+xLLyem<(hjBZm~ZM@99>N3@z`KvvylsPhM?0Lb9cHr@cF-#ENU-$lfy7Glm z;b$Iq4Y1c_Kyu{Ow)MLTS;3oeoZI2aos!E6HLO^Vc^mj7T<^8lj}Bh{zrS{0XZL&7H-qOm7!ou7;LN?l3o&m4&vDTA zeww>S(yjBa%M!qI9Ly~Js6xXrldH3S5_m3Onft@uRJ@YecilsjF9kfebKj#47v<3v z^2f0{DKHMEWLwf;b6oL8Y+nbS=bLBSqbiRn@oF&h+d;W-Zetqy9AGzz+Q!E}A>|ggJfamy7)tKIE`s-a)SU(9o$H$}V@2;z6jc_xc z0-oa|$Kcx)OSidaWnO(1?Z1<7N@(IL+lr#6nb$FoapF%+!S4HwBiAq=1D^eV!!u&h z-nO0m^MRT5VSmzvVtK|r$TGfP{~K0C#~Zc|?iZ2$I0@~!*O;g@`zzfQ(ie)#5UlXE{8 zVLk>t$H(ZT$)`)bYVTXIh;fA1GmJc*`0i7|9)NG0fE^pK%J56OPBmH7Smg6HJ01IU z>f2E(q-ea+qQARgr$R<^-!;EZX~4YlI@OogH#-WI8Q1WmZ7=h@e&YG*!;i63kLCK^ zzkY~@KF{wh+{^cDE3NX6tIYHK-g9l)0WCDq{_`B>d43=H>2-?*d3XBzJM%ohk6AI| zOqcs3{PDy*&+miN^`4~IG-eQ&pLw3&J7|xr@6~Fif4pIy=l52&4wwF_`0iJ^KF{x2 z_de|V;$gyDInVQZiK5NA)aX-jKJz^9a6DvR5Op;3zAYZXf2|#T@laMsQ9H)npmvG} z?)hVS-tXHt^v~Zsu5ms^x;rxM%$wU6W+I+EGW`wVMfyFdz0tS7|3Ay&TSZVgR5z&{ zT43Eet!rPtJ;Q%q%KeASQL*9~)u2Mr7OsaGdR&jT?X&Jl*L25o=4~?jSy$zVSIP&pG|Ckfc<(9@S!Q$D<7-j*%!{O?rtQ*-o5i?a}DP0w*vd+ zrgu{+Po3QOl$__dJZ`?_-mv!IXgSYu*>v&Y6>pZ-{g3&$%z^dqU9?Zozt%o(=Hq4j zl$ae)mP|_clX-Pw(*KdzVx1~Pw8t`2IpY*qX{WR3pUC#5k&}C+w?EP-nxFzR# zTo|(VW$iVw*&E4u9v2Fa>(nRH?XmvzU(TP$h5qGxj(+aA>L1sb=W!vl`O*{`O&>{huLc+~R@{cb$}%kNrO>PgL1?^BNyw-rXk9|DI#F6Pqtl z`0H<#U9VV_DWQD#IXC>*3$)ljWB-8`Pt5o!{TyF-1&O%XzkcWkseIIr8jV%)C)%zt3~W(VbyO^D(c* z{tA~rf5)dG_PVbs$a%J3Y{i=CRg&TkGw+ny@3rjNnM{-J8ku)w2rPf|E$dQ#8{EL3 zKl5yV$&jPdf6SSFD(h?R2Kwi4@4e4cs$N;fe2i@WXr!U^wY$1W9ppUQAFyuWo9um6 zb(puv?9Z5Sf8~x5ll=9!#RQgr(c#x^sy&$FpSN6wKz_dGcX!!8#tviq39{>XxvDik ze3`3Bkfm{;{iF_?#^sn;+<(5sJolfd&S%QysIc^Rw$D8G zpSPb57ud9ZrGK1fp8L;$joEJ%OX-^Qg?<9H!@Im0Yt1>I@QQhj?0$^+h2ut#{NO&z zyh(PwbJNu$9Wsu3nU#5$?Eb9QzXrcuRBCa1InV8vvE}S!<=F}2nAhJAjF0k9*5zDr z>w#p5tr$wYa&{ zf3Qc(d5*8L2W}on+o0SdInVJ`Ij8NXk|CS@@yGdd`L|;VUE99m zM5gZ_HDUXTa)JEgx_PJfo{{b+<}ED)`RBQ`1Ai*G-#>pc&+YT}V36zl{n?jT-~Lx% z`@DPKzQ~yhrTqPu-*d(OTlF&XK+0O3KYo~J`->Xx+R;9^r+?o|@i5SSy=NKU&8vHM zJ?C$eU60>*W66^>$-jIapTM*I&YqWHkB|SFj`fW)`_*eb>T-A0;55vuD+K!I@w@tm z{+(E01M|t6KtBA~!ks&d{O8+t5%X8F?0WZzIR$3!-alQ(`pSBN`YWI6Ua4018Y1Vp z{D05QQ*uYp+)2!9lF2^?TpwPkxl{DX!MpKtp07tAukm}HU9s8y{fqT^UpGc;zSw%r z1^@WLJn!q;D&P0q&Km7MFJqqfbzh(Bx@cmLMjz$*^S*9;vo@0~2?dHfhK{_c=#vmW=A^E`gMeg9#8RqLnWa-PSJU%DkNicLCsmHF73f$`UQ z_a(b-n9JY4;$(c*i8W@|h_Jn3eKW=vwjcE@pLh5>%_|G4h=k_1z`rZ8I{Q&>^mw9ggmWRe>9ld3vKR%h~_D^20>;AoVSN#2x zd2avaN1t7578~VXzcA13U$f56&E?Zq^6!%|&+WgrUeKxjYZ_0J*Pq)z{J(o?v~Sx4 z%Xx19yptCu&WO3*RL*nz*PYy|%W-Ga6gkiBU$oip>R%iWmdJT-pXY~;T+~F*Jj8s$ z7xVLpskhTP{r$sPH84JIg^jNGwUA2IERT}My+*4iTHdHmWGI<~~cw2xac z@BTY*e6L}8d8CSS&sgTovgZV%($uN9w`|*ya-QuU>u=4Vb`3NzuYVe7e`{;?f{gWE zUSK|0*xw zJ2qyP^K5^~vuhhCMdhBryy974`49hFu>IiUW1Y+!I|SMv-!*)T`bx?ZInVYVj6GK^ z9oFM& zU<@!Gn7Et#nhez8xtKInJAzcXagnylYl8e^*+i^2ebqE`4T763OujD z&xL4^HUjy14hzzDpcCi@D)4-P0cZz$fO_2DZv{GlE}#dfI!NW#0u4YD&VZa}1!xC4fo`CJ?^^=ufkvPOXa_ohZlK~%~4s-(DK!pqXKt0e1v;gfu zC(sR4;(9z^_lQQCuhYjO9S4jDCIXXz$_rGEC}1=&78nPN2POiOfl6GjkK*h0z*t}$ zFdoR)d18_%Unj2jL|vz}63Ev(Vv&vm#sd?9$w1`|)B_j|j0L)YF*iw0af?s`)B}w` z3(yI)1KmKyZRi8_KqJrsv;&<$H&Ee*K2Q%d0xdv0&|8>mP|{y;s@2($q0 zKqt@*R6K${P!BW$EkHZa33LM$kD(9L1C2ln&<=D0-9W_?=mYgYBhUi01D!xOQ1LhP zfqI}3XaU-RPN3o`>A8{CAZ-Ndffk?>Xa~B1nrCE(*VlTaEkGmC4s-*ZK*e*EA1KzK z-lgdOd;fQ*!RF@Oy3{lKF8B&z?@#Ox=?2sNP_DORujkV>H|O>$)Vt=oqn$KhOe7=VF#wu%&yyXW%-Y+vYpfq29@t?+pG!9_2LRITbth_xU;NMC>Qv$8{;bKEnIZ{CrOWu4`xulDzpRLL1IUUFj&z*JqNj&uD@F zcwaLS`J`kcdA^>+=WYBvpr#S=?ka@*oF6}LD#F0~9%hB&9pVlsj{B~Y6(&6u;;BvM z(c>~--Z)F}A})O!p5Ff%(+a}-tL2N!!2<^N_idT`jtP6w?H;J-h#bLsZGe-Q#+ zKG=riUfaH3hgL&fInrxB?<;`k@~oXbZNTJV5i^CbC{HF*Q!uKK9%$+`U|_d8od$Lr z*tB0@cMi!lSz{rcDG->>`Nfj#?w_MY$?k2AWDWbgaXga7;= zdG8+P+ELw!%CBSD#vrhbWo(0tF_!U5r=M!TSjWajwlNkMgUlnATCF~6d``FM?qlm< z7?hb1lyDhD2tmAp5+)N7CLfy1FenfP0bvk%iaalCruB!cvcQvQa*>b-3<%oYiP+(f$FuzknJjhSG z1U%Lw@@v??+;RAFUivxUp8=dsz~O&Mr;2%ukrPksqCJ}5!n}LzCpJG!zx@>34wRly z75UKe9Qq9{?qX~=VEZSK>vCz_WBE#c8q;IFV7fd9 zJ9OG?xMP9_H}D{%;V1x%DpyQ-$Eh0Pt$rv=*M0AO+WVNrSKcE34MKF81*3u z%m7QkDzE|U0f)c|FarO_fhk}XSOzwM9bg|g0!HD_1TYQE0V}{dumxnfl#s8kBbWZ1 z?Ucy-%v!N<>=pUVqeZ7Lcl)E>>9%|i?R@74*KAg%^Lo-B{I*dlKfv^Vk$(b$FH9x& zPuzTmAbN(?Lw*8bm*?tby%Pn3Q|^l&2d@OAT`lx)btPy2zvZMSc2NFyM=ts3 zB0l*8gk7E+e@DfSo@Mh*xi9`0dK2I?AH9ohKa^GSk51pn9IS7@0r~rs9W}&9F@~B5 zyFAGU^|JoZ4$7}qdWXMAnfua zKJ~JlNPJg*r3mm7y~%T||H#iE?D8aj1o9G4REV7WEbB_n^DuNh_yN*pKB$NCBCZRF zeFNwve~hrp6FV56`Otc&FQ%be^d`=o&377MmnV9|kmrEZ%l)S{B|i)OBI^tJl)Lpt z?C2mq`F(_4p4c&hoJhSq_bGDTY`eb%cCbGopK`a~6gyIgPkt6*mnU|VAtzFA4bL47 zWe1<1m_PCoS`Lp?B{bIjOKIOW9O&~t` zX@p&#q?d!7NWDByuBPl@KHwIiPwl>T`k#4>0}6;gI*3nxA7Pg_^)uqJeoD}lGhLC3 z-pG@!f5?v`?D8c32eX_#W08v;EoDa+VV5WA4In2{@8oJ*E}_V5{r@QJ00@0*_isYr)@!jNf%xR75q5cE z2lcYOQZMCh|0sHE&_jL`VV5`cC*&O<_41sop^|eQ2kj;Q@+5u>^3Vmd?IDNffw+?YEDWW+wBw&a!2W}FWD%eIGQuuT>|lJ_tM#&+ zsJ9J0!NqW?)?;n&CB|Xs_y~z59`~<=-PxOwFUK-bF zZ|qsNy_S{yd?A>hE-%VmyTy(s;*;M&*yV{GeaMNDhRC^|cB1UK$4U(%zTW!aa+u1Ar&Efq-N6C54lb#=8|4XDEhTZ2uu`l!tn{Qr^BJA?Sz69h%>g9U= zEUr_|daM0^5!#8{e~BG6#3#Rru*(xWsF(Fcr+1YI@Dsg5=plcCu*(y@9mpe>&bEi_ zS+;&9mHc;*585k9ik`1QzDy$wiXA1yC%=lY%aizDLVVU2>ZSaM(%Xd|@&^dJJki^L zd<>-CI@T{lFPqKxFCd-6PI{t;^4lD_PZS8}#5`c0A* zJ(RomE3qSs_~e%nc6k!N204*>2YBz@R(3o9hn?l*Tl7%=6h|(03=yCF3BoQ<;zwfE z4@BD0TtWYb>y-a2(qZ{g{x--LfdXPj3GvCVBJA?S4(et3NqkrC&aaE!F7%K;K-lF; z{08J>AoX&;c=U?ddcbiN{YF0JSBL;Vu_KN6fP9FacT>)c z7)4@71Mw+tGfaWuN&L4X%yvjSD1V6v@Dsgb=pjFRrOmI)6TLm~Vz@3UL|(=DCTS%< z4{5v_NIvDq9l6+1L45M-2)jHRS?4&1l zQ10G;Bp)fnCqIj@%aizJ$ceOr-=AnGJ9rz@yxEe=dPXWO^Z-6H`~|Jr(IW)qGm-IDXOj?jk<<1B6|k_0Yn9#-^pIag*yV}d6yyyc^^UP#xU1x! zLprpV{I5dp)&nW0G2)XSj@$gYJh6j%c^{x&%H8qQwEUrm{2anAPxQthuK=lcaLA4` zno3R{k^C6eW%d=H&xc2lfAT56-;s;mp=)gZ$&VuJ^2Bb&zfHx@f={_GegeEQkalIU zeyE}3>~Gob$*0_X9+7N?8qQK z`6Yy1p4d@^oJhTCtYd8{J3i)lzW5~M4~PQ%#Et>tv!0I;c6nmQ#}S|XuBdS3w^FG= z(VMu|`iJ~9!Y)tZhat}asWCBK2N%aeR$A#VezcY^tufs+3R zPko{M!^)2E_0|u}UkqWFCw4GC`*GSq`6Wtk4tmJ1Anfu)ZxZr4kb3!@+K!U*oFP3A z{S#z>^@4gRKdkHv-C*-geiUJsC-yNu^P%;!{6sGGGYdWBml1Y(qBj9~4M@Ey?uSuw z_9L!+lHL$J%6;RY33x=N$8&RHH_o<)uL{BZs8{}%^fKU4?z@kcz#~e0$#?uR+Yi)L zdPh-y%qRJjyZyP?(M5dn2MD`7NpB1}k$U;Pi)dmt-#o`f&+DFncE$QaJ(RomO|dTr zz2sLAc6nkSC`vven`vLOrfZ%2k z;3syZ5TE=k!Y)tjxCsQ>D=J+1HB@R)^fsV}{5HZaPvVy$?*XZo-w_!rInS5T?*m_r z^qCLpq5Pw`E+Fh{7zVy{+0Zd5TE=i z!Y)tZ{|Vx;{3Ynh-TS8K?LrUv1B6|k#BV@822yY2N}Ipv;%vUTu8l~38SC59iob!3 zF@NN5LGT_C;3sxh5TE=y!Y)tjeh>uaPgJ<_Whyl&di&5r{s>{0C-Ga5hn8mZ&F`(n zmHf*{hwVXvqK9&Kye4*J5uf}r!Y)tZ*B~cSZ|R6Fm$tHF8UCPN@+o)qiycE{$HZet zWZC+GNWB&8qfO#EES=#}_s@G1AjkAas1G9Mv4x7U=s;3-$i-F{c> z=pa7pK_6k4C;1pbPNW@OoHG|$nXUilA-^zZ8j|!<;8E^dhr{^nZj(NXhOo;MI~bq+3+=o4wB7 zPeM1%=I?u+d4k6vcgLM#M*{Jgzcj)wPwe<>#D6OCNjoTK|0{CQTZ10*n+Ur+(VK(3 z1Ek(0*1-*x`~o4E-(I~p|BD{V&!1kkf5eW+i)QYW+Zd9ATFy>7^hi(vAk!wU=<6^4EIopxhm|ia#65jyA$B zPwePHPGou|yk8zGJBl7VD8EAaBlhB1en($z0b0N_e!DLX6tzc--FQm@h(F8tOvB4a`!$ot^d$Vehy)m zC-zk!CsJ<<=Z7?veV4+H%Yo!mUUcMQM<4OYA0h1W#16)H%TeOTZ@2!T+!sFtUJ6LN z8kkQhDLMO%mpJx{9hAS?kx%PC;*;M-*yXwL?^5x{;8X64-vclFlG%EZ!@O5Q$yq;H z&dfLEmnb`Oh);e6VV5WQs6$Sq-qf}BKG9KjFkfsB+K*c6p*V3V9hwz3Cfm{u)aDV;Fj$5b+Z|ly6XIQ0(X-KKVn0 zU7j2Neic7!z2MD`7v5$ILP7>dhvp=BT=$+OdjYB}4P$iFpr`#960$vA5yZYGAG*oh?_X|#Xt{oqC92B!}|#Nl)L3E`4}KR`D27#p5!C^GMir_^@i~L zoWOO;Ka2{@dQAC8Ao!FB@Dn?7h);e6VV5U%Q13a6Y|xdv^DCma13l#T5q5bJzYh5b zDC$L?DBAuya?fnNXSs9SK|bZYzlvP!NFhG?S%h7lq{sNYk1~D(e9C?C%iy(vv@4RZ z`4}kqSA<}GEPwf5?4bM-5#T5J2xqJx$d4iH@+5u|a-ygZdHOlH|KU32izs;N)pB=y zEOykD9W8`io}|}>oJhTO*fCOe@Vk?G-#XuevVKwz%kvHq;3xJaUT*zFei~tyC-!mv z;~Yjd=*r#kk?5^K5BW`mU7p0xLEZt1dXd+$-*~9x+;7Kx3SZKTyu#*#a^HTtICw;+ zH(0Rcoxyd=KPvy2AN?c$i+#T%|CrwkEKL839aY39zk#sJllUJ;JkF0w(3RhW>jI*8 z06pZ75q5bJzYTf#-r0U2j`{F}l79+@(q2hV^!#@S9u@(9Vn+_~$*&;n@+AJ}K%l*% z!j-d}L@s(e&_jM7VV5WI>yVFt)Z4}T)yOMn^F0qcbbF=TZHHn<3h~L$BJA?Sjxyv# z+L6GxxuNWMy~hs9nQ!`|r|cLa?DE8p3FJiDk;A#rvHNEIahAsp%H94^{EgVFy6y)A~U<#~UISI|hhP{up7GCw4GC`yH+KdJ*6!dK0g* z{vkh&u*(y@VaRhpQ6ci$12%s(CFePEy8cqWLL&@{9Ua6czmKrXlk`TA6KO{i=VC`* zJzL)Ac*>h{w?7s;Qi#v;&LZsc#EvrLMB34~&HAIE?BF?tMDo)(54orKuk}1vy$kYt zL;-$c_XP1-KO$M{2bU*y=Mi7GBg)-=TJ&b1hx`)4E>HBvA+G|(G?9nPjIhg-^uqVsd=o{D$h&9Ta!KGi<@`RjUWY+D=uhE`9Tmi<+*eQQ z9y=y*D5b})Y; zm-NcuQSLj3@_rClPSi`eYoF+CLofL~gk7H4TZ4QEq~0#pZ-rkw+wSwQgYB4n%3b|p zM-uVL&mipb#Euf=MCz^JJ8^YoM+)cj==HcC^tA7fKwc2V_=$Z3=%xS12)jJ7k9ygk ziwaln-nT?=;&s+<o8LrEr~kV|m+7N=nY}KI{F3=XlEXDUjc&>}x|W z^W8((<%xaNtMg6yl}c~;XJ+#qL)hhs-XYRU;yUx4K>v_a^5aN{_LBcF zA4S;ZNqUTbjuYRNU+u_6Zx(vUFC*;oBz^+&8c@`TeDqw~kF=G%>lwHH5a}}?)bkU_ z*$yQr_D!Id{K%^HgUb^;evJ5g?Z$*%`OUa4AbK;(Oi$!u#{lukA0zDYB)xFK=9@^pb$st4f$NlWKILK&;3s-0cklmVM-K7H zuORI5Bz_%oqNo=67~j|EC_7j`muUp}l;7>h#f}l;@A21czFnTA$M`Q$@l)XM$vyF- zkY|CSM)YQ|j4@?!|Q zJkdKudP!WD_##i>J6bsA|KIHnmhBu->ST59a5`uS%06(#>0=?wd5q5cE-wp`uM@5Az zck?59`_M!F2w|5e@mr9Gj@tZF?+EkhaV38TY^OiTr`**qc4QHs{4&BWPwc2cPNd%9 zYta8IJCZk9xjvu&3ePz5D#)*b{Q_d&1bXTJNXh!a<%xY)B0l{|`zXIu>CHe7`6Yy1 zp6HE3UIkKb744{{+n}#0pa|pXU(Hn!j0u&V@k6>P`spPe%*?jBs#A2TFL*4_Mc;BOb%H4Tcu{-nz zn}7172)jJ7F9A7`ddt{`YXIde96jG+6Igw+4Tqm%u?~zzYDfoI%30#TP#k1)mv>i{9=oB zVDvWdfgND=b}LW6#9|-VPTO$h4vQ^d?M@pm-DNR>bsrO8_iigs&7tcXyJP-7NjWrv;QnXkHc7f@2*bPh_ zwc#Fc2<(=ud;sih*l-^>0+!!k<(UU9vLBzEZo?%bu~EU%%qXx4rj|BpvC$bMlY*<)(i_p~$+u&-%WDo4MUy=l5@0ICrFh{Vw`Dpb6;X z_aphe$k5$Z55EVw_r1`ZmGe7}jjRp(zL)F!u4ohI)A4(`QRt~+Ub2C6r1%}(KAv+! zYc@UoUEK)wy|rG9>-erFzqiZpm)1G|7Y7gTQ}uUE`JLS;-gELhyZqj13g2DicXm^l z?}#B?es`DOo$TTqyAj4u*-LEt34Gs@-{Wn=u2IZh=l6N}-AR65Reztih4*bylyhxw z{>s-TaPk8|#pINQd8Z<##E4-}U8pC>zkv@BH$6ll=Z` zl>1EJj}hiE+t0K1>+b=F-)P%Q94O60+TXcoCq#~?UY0*z+$rY^MO+tyttj zd-#1?;`vrhXp{Er>~{#FuLpf2;Gcf%ZFm2V>pt~&(D&%Qh)?AA3Hg0LekYFKY2)|F z_`NQEPipUbPS{t#@8R&f8T>8)&*kTN@;r~7=b7_-@4fT2(ckc#W1cgd!g;(rFP7(- z@*GZ{^T=}+dCnovALRLeJU@@;u@cuo(`k>R;9JYR+9jqn@^ zo}bXT$m-*MaPDK~eqZjZ<-SzzgX6w1?)Txo4({XN{sXSx=elgJx8{0Rt{3Hc%e{4U zn6Kgb0KRYM`(VER<$Ku%{KEH&e1FIHJ)Cdnd^P96I4{Kc9?q-q`JT_aeE#F}o>WtL zUWuNt?J5aGJ@(!w*R~4x?rv{v9^G#i({{@5IEN}$-*?*oQ2vYC-}!dxd!zhge#Ej3 zhF)1J#>!jAHVP-Nixp06Zx=UrV}*P zR}|Ne6)PJL70(6lhC(U7ZEDF4+qkl^d-BTi;n+?oKexCPJ3K$PGQYa8SeRSSCsz_n z$-+`HUtBJ(&leWg*5{M!iQ;;GZFSxVlFRdJ%gOxWYJO>XZDncYaDI7l`SFsu;dn8> zX$sLvE}5SzrUi@ zcn88qV!PWXil$XheZ94AyB%r1rt$6OH;#$p%~k1rO!vv&@G9D9eKZZh-#%aUPHNjdF(cjKSTmQx8N;!%XU6J^ISq)U7dVJSam&5mheCyZ{}hnl;z8Re|m zffD?8V$<9&O&_4f6V@!#W0y@=yEhuyF23=^#&%H*bv!2ZjOPGWe|FYiEH`3y-_9LV z5ZltdNLRBXwSRj$tTE;pk<>UDGQGf9W=dB|bJ`P`Q3*yT_KvVwe0aa^IYyau#4bJ$ z#Q*86T^z3wPr|Mvv7=_B7(0Gq$5ie$lh2LylQI_C_kl^!*fVw8&hFNhsrlP-V>3fc z(`gphUSNAzX#}ygjh(`=tsUd>b;(n4f8=^{zt0W6fAPGyuCn_9*h%~ugkLf3;7y{& zhv-dBva2VpHK++v)%G$a<4oLDIk28O+*C%XEgRdh)x4>_8=FOXRs6|w+baKT)}OD3 z9mLnspAVUPOn%jjVcna|o;R(*(jJWqO$i&Da4WiQI*7D}Y@Rs2YAUH|URwogs~IQI zDqGGxcPH|5vv&PD>>&Oc!jFHymsb1A;?C}i&0yBtkuuv`k3WRG;ios)GWLq!dG1b2 zg7mfJY1Pkfn}?R;#odj9k!@@iHp<2-(>zSKBt4PTwP`PT{jPENwA+F3 z#HQ&gw|7iOfG37c(?`Y%$MPG;XUv@Xhv%Gxety=@o6oR@5?_SyZT@a zKeSPN_{#F$xL|p4&5V^74zJA@63fN>@5%hg2El#!TgVp|7FL!Q=jMycE5*c; z862+8Cl^)<3(KoZ#r)x=^`!abR~F~Y#d-4xwX{@RonKmAUQDddudOGaNYV%TiKR93 zyqcU}PpmGl7Yd2Q!m4?^H0dqREfo$guFfA`HD=5&n+LRoVsdG1F|kxwS(`K2PA)7b z=2q7J?XN{71Y5;m7yi{&Unzr%(TT zIeMIS`2VRYIrXggmHQ5J@0j)LN8x)S#|4k?*L=BbrXVr1_loJQw0N-TIde)s)d7Lz zkNcN8|J!W-c91{fHo`|X%@7(7^D-2ZnHLNN%`EElCXB)0YSGLN6mOh9uGt~D8Kjwk zqui(W#%(v6M*^8d$ea6ydBWS9#CcdIJ=fOuru6p91N&hb@0_*wLey*G1y87+Zxm<|ebWlwZuRF3g!uKCx`3NYmbv$F)(rcY@H$6Z`M-gwun9qg}& z(I;N6X1MxlGi2O4A>;0&X0qY`SA}cJOWHTrr^o8Eer=;XiJw6D@%yj+IeK$reHEwk zpGceeDUH&mR!cs)p1Jbw*?g`cU&I2!_BoeNi}DJVlt=V`djjzi?9b zU~00;JOk}@d!_tC8(Z5>6&L%sPB-^Uv-WYmh4=>8cVs$&V|rM5i{j~FF&$*5Sj^+u zLuMQrGw-2F<{8(#E|DoAX^qU9rwK08hG#x<~O2xv1F*E0V)G>2fU$~w%^qv_z zAAKh5B98DLtBLn3So1$obp?kv>%W$W(;zWTiW;&ngzm=Gkr(97(5L-Hu^V%@Qp zb3Krja~;4r)0FKW(VxTmc+Ib2eTSBF9f8)@9~t%vI^w7iOSMOshn z^}+t(x-ZQSqkOgg7VOdd2-f3he)T26{%N2bwVvD^!F;Yq)BLWd{*06) zw7lujQ$hcx`Dv_Q)N+2`PRqG&Qp>rXN&6wS=J7M?q1F@fv|p~v)O@a+(&=*jrsi|~ zrj~QvmDa;`o|@mmxTF&*TTF&pa zXnE7q&!>F#AM4Y!Kl$Adt)J^*56H28R?C~7`cp%D*XeRSoR(KS_XVDRuhZpvT`iB} z+!d{#>+Q6h>wUGJA=bBQ{simlv^?c$FFCB&)%u%QSFGh(taH}-dA_-pb6v95)ARJV zJl9+EdCs<$^W5tL@|%PE6Ruy>cJf?kt%vKVwLI~ z39Q4`^45L9_D3+T*7bzz;I$sEi`Vjrr~l`9Y?`0&^#57xC(!nA-M!YsbJnz+>+`jo z=b>qN7xh-B%XR&lpLw?Rr{;70zvhRq??CgpE?CPao_@H4eo5=+xnEiyITCCq_a$h4 z%5$HppjJwJUOP{h1ZIFGU=`Q^wt+q15I6xwe#PpG15>~(unepLo4^jR4;%qQ@3Z=% zzyvT2%mFLFI;Z?s2{7`0~lz#OmwtOHxXE^q)G1H&Ig{((tg23P`Cfem0A*aHrM6JX>+$UiUz z%mT~68n6lM0QO%UElyX28MqX`3EL}8DI%m1vY?fU=KJ1 zPJoe*ApgJ=FbgaLYrrP31MCAwz)%zU2PS}NU=COT)`2Zx7dQZpf#F|6{((tg23P`C zfem0A*aHrM6JX@mk$+$cm<5)BHDD9i0rr6-VCbXBKQIAI19QL%unueiyTAc(3=IDZ zW`HGN71#i_fj!_5H~~g}1NjH0fLUM}SOYeJ9bg|g0*3x2@()Y^)4&|C0;~gD zz%FnA90S9@iTneTzznbitO6UrHn0aA0w=&o3;748fLUM}SOfC?PYCyqrXx4^tH*dB zB!+SSx^?S#+3W!0GLETK-am0aUFH+kju(F^ectifyB-pP=$meEHUAUOo5l= zEn7j%8kgHQ@7P@5a<<8a+;$!Nq)jjKuO7Vm9dEerB@#UzIwMrW^D4`U2=!BtcEDl~i|M~3a`+~|T;``F)dxegQul?uC zKi?-zRD9ik`Qr0^L9#QOf9-!?{yD#2QSo*C@zp=R2k5Byy8L|Yhx7lFQ^fc6ADkag z{?2Uvb@}`J$NBGyim&@`pZ_=?-Z@2lpZ%P7o~ZcRexLt1pPKy4Z2q*<=fzYT#g^!GVn6F3CM&>!Z2P2dn1Lw}J2Hi1K64DBfgYyyYC z80uRN*aQxNF_cFR*aQxNG2}M~YyyXlALRa+MSdra-1z4))(4_F`EmNYZ+C-RRYNk) z;kiB0-?im?-Gv`~QS+G>Ot<5U9-g;D+v%|;6m zxn9sLsy9pNi)+>(cQj|8tNPG826lg=_u1XyO}_`dk3#JXO#OSI9e1Zcw_pE7&gU>K z4`E(b%VSvYqvcJkH_`GA=D)R^=M-r<&n?pO;asr&T>q%~T>q%$UA*_u@*dWaX*thN z((*RW`_}Ra-kWJT*IjBk*Il}DQ$HSMy&@*oKmFTZdyXyEX?fy2-N@%>%QJ)b=vrRF z_iEjAL{AOlKP?~TgZ<5QpPFAy1oQXKnNszxb+w0&b!J*W*Oh8H&#%&Qt}E5@9Nw>J z`SA2$dpN$(e9lv7`2g?NwVdl#wVdl#wVdbeXn6zYb7^@7`(d;^i}!_EKJm3FI~YFABDk>yot|p8KZdam*WNIoB&|c@^_nTF!Yr zEl+v+AD&mE`8Hjd_FDDc*)tL zFRb;1Jokmf(}K&Z9?-wZxQ^pgBFC#QKe4sTL79vXd0+4Sdwc(W?OXqDcdO9s2}krC z0+~pCJF;UL*F?`4@grZcdVcbgzq&1c&sQ#ko=45jk?D`faYPb)xhUfRp6ioUa;~G- z{^EI#THf-EGkET!=JOm#E$2FYE$?~y$A+h!)I9a9>uHCakI?CI{!hyXp8IIkQ!jg1 z2c+9=$I~B0FrL%taz0VZd48srmpuJ`{VBoqyX;Aq=PT)Y!hH`qU7q8qF6Xn7p- zvsym%JeQ?C^`U)dusx|42FtlGM5oJhS+$(!U}<^AlP>p{X#U8PU!DW2`P_G+<=l6o z<(${k@-)_)YkALepWyx#&F^}~Lp--u^M^-*{onAki?CK{v<7Ld&av_PdiF^>Q(xNVE=HvfKHeDpR}C&pR~O7^kDrwpIY;|UrNh) zj-Hm6J^gJ8=lp9v&)e7XlBXZ;d!C0Q&kL?^9lW2^`p2lZTF&>8THg2E*Git}x_-bo zUdF>b=kI`iPyONfdYaGoOIptTXIkFG{s1lK{xdBfVEwO_b6=X4^SnJR?|H`UolAqu zi|=!_p2;o2{20~|Yktd9fB3#v^P8UgX38V4Ee6}ebKJH5kf$Hx`(w@L`R`hu^OPgc ziP!w9htK!UnxFRE-)N-E3ujM?KP|M?<`PPod9_~BTdg`A3wsLWBzGCxMuFHk{6t(``La?3+ z`c|Ea(1Ct*7bnf6vpdx!yzT348dFOM>m;x(}^~>p8TX z-?h;4h-aLcJm03P>*v^$-@0cWpZidCx?DG+1i+A&#LuvKdY7xJN){m@#@{m@#@^-x;g_Vf=`Pd}W(cvY7R_f>2C zDbF}I<{5v+Jo66|UwL`z8_z}6_Hci;mUDl$mUDl$mUDl$mJdARims>JdH$%LSK)qc ztv}{@UPxg6NAr0Or`FGP@tQyJJXa1p;}fov(|Qt~=e{1E(=~tSneXDhbIs?zb1mn( zJ1ytFb1g638r(lrJ@#}x&mHwc!FooX@#@I)Ji>kL+D`6k*Yf)7g46AIo<|bsSG6AQ zd(iUcT(JI#r=Hh5@0*&QeqiFc-*r6W*qrCS!}X5Zey&&4a_;BQ@)YjlTF!m>TF(6+ zTF!m>THf-^t8l-*=68MdaQR@l$a_$(=OprdXrZ*V!H@UJd(g_#=cntVqJL@MgTD09 z4?OmT)xTes_nSt~qgv)cW z=2txP$vj6v^Z6Y-EgyKwvFh=2#nax~*9Y4l^W>|%9?VaA?rT|(oaZ;_d{sTq1+mu# zrd!glB&wVQAX^%W7L+goo#?Rwt1lN;cAy}Tle7hdM zaeci`cj#$f3D12w?(tjMGk(i?#_c?}L)#Pb+`k5%cE@u*w4T1FeYHK$WjRl}O^<)7 z9{nLte))Y*ZD+$X4;J&h7aKn*xZHUzvo814%Yykl??l^ExhI%k_Ow&(57ByfZps0< zXWohDrf7c3Q~w*D`oMEmw4Ts>aK89`Rn1S~oH;G8Uly!q=;;T>p7(Jf&vO~iuh!}E z+!rk$z9!h7oTuEwhlBY%4@N(y^E?=xZgnnL55G^V`3cW_V8qkU)II%4%#$ykPovZA zd&UDf&;4cOc`oL6cD4Str+m2|N%Lc#ex~Gkk2dhslQ5nWb$Ri89i48@bARav*e~Px z2o^LFa~LmFfOTLC*aZ%NV_^8-+2@5AFbT{6OTa3y0c-<%z#(t~OkiI|8khrCfOTLC z*aZ%NV_>)o`+!Mc23P`Cfem0A*aHrM6JX>ER&N}b0%n0_U=7#=c7T202pIaJ)fWXO zfN5Y3SOM07EnpWo0FHs-FCqWHBrpRk0jt0Uunp`1hrkIi@_WcXFa^v4%fK423G4v- zz!5O?W#k{20H%RCUL1WtgFKS2J0DPR^@2G)R0UcYMR)BS23)lq?fMa0zkC1<0 z5|{y&fK^}v*ar51L*N7$`D5fCm;z>jWnc~11a^RZ;0PG{6XYM50H%RCUrrhr*s8CU~0fgNBUI0AjWnc~11a^RZ;0PG{ zGvptb0H%RCUjWnc~11a^RZ;0PG{56C|-0ZapPzzVPqYyrE#0dNcqe+T&oCV?4X30MU-fNfw8 zI0R0Bk^hMN15>~(unepLo4^jR4;%qQ-$nj`31AwS16F`_U<=p<4uE4|_%D!uU=o-C zmVi}Y1K0-kfJ5K}7#Sk}z!WeGECXx6Ca?qS14qEn_mF>J0+O0vo_Kum>ChC&0)Lkbhtbm<5)BHDD9i0rr6-VCX+1 z|G)$=4a@;6z&fx6>;ebCF);i$$UiU%%m7QkDzE`;1AD+BZ~~0{E%Fac0kgm|um)@b zJHS401PuKbTKSch4 zDPR^@2G)R0UVDdhb=a~#c zU!1Af_aGmFmJnh?=-#UK( zZQl^G*u(Qrh&%Ft?5ikOpy;2LBf{LL%KQ+8$Ddm+T>niTkzB!PxkEqCKOm2&`Lvts+sGrjd?P!M z?>_t!I@9_o0n7mwk94N(y!>X1qEGTkc@*yxXfIKC{7w0Y z&-q>Qh~x?y*@6Ax(X&twfWnh}@%(@>@>3xX{hd!A?H~TuY`z%g`dr#a6n*@;eyHF* zJb6TN1&!=LzQ(XOcF5*Wc#<#f%kANM2G@0YasNHB|3O>tBOkJu0G5Guprj-AlgIrW zw3{eA{-*gweD1R$k4Ubd@R>gMWs*nKeA>@*SI8r3KJ&x%o8%E)zL7mjKM{xUYvgR} z{}iwcYyw4(lneLqHW9Cn>$+Uneu(YQ+w$lGMW6VGa-L&KyNSZ%Pxy?__0HrG$rUuR z1NAKzw)w0Bg(vyq`uHT|U7*ev*C`RBzh?851ZIJvSL~&n=cLk3qVV_=KJ{_EAbCV` z1%=P_xGs%6qRTh31M96)=U9J~flZ*q6TfiXQv~upQ2T}B3nK5&q37H4vFZ<6YyD>U>2N;;c|>vrh0pZ4{)jxH=GS2#&zT^PsQJtn_ob0X)O_Zj z`!>iUx_l!$FwQ8SYs;?*>;psRS$P7O1ByN=SFQ((gI~vWU9LQzoLI*Fvxoal6a90A z{RrC4i0upd2TuC3F06_1P3TG1PO(eIvm9UZyz}&r{?lduYW-W&+k|96j;r@;5Ks zl?ZR!lU1m>yjU~Un1`lcjtEtB_Wxg=;!#t+;j*F_JX zr-*#6G9^^p+%d;u3lTrj7k#qzOA>heE3f$%x0JtdjZhv>U(utl1U)t2oiBOmr>o!i zhkp=#COy$P{b>}TksY{C4xr~$DDfkq)Ar60qCS3anyAzLe>yC7Nqu6v>8I?s!(`~t zo}Bl&3G$x=kM(cp#1nno&pL7B;%}Be)06c1GqMBqJ{{S&N3L@mL8Km{=yL65y)8ix z?XDrL?dJZY_9@cU<*(DFzd}z%eLjW1xIR1%zUUJ_a^JKo7e7+Jn{SCDzaT%=p_eGU zAV0O0y*@wj9H41Zx;!{{Cs|+ zoY-^p2Kj5G?DY97e1#n!hA-H!&tebfcbJ~F&i*yB1MMN}#1FEkg6pTM=iFD)aP)~i zm%xB0YR|}tA7oGX!r5~4`G@P?MMqOw4RQ0Bec&Dm2JP)!D zzW7({rC*8cXCmMw9DY!F#GXD|PkiN(#QZ`Ad`VyG3HQb8dh!$@m>)3#zm0%7^j{TV z1ns#2Yy(rM=Y3!f^`Qcs0K>4W25c%jJGg J%qI_q^$i&7Ix+Wh*^NaTR?rUfOk*KxHeV&jw@-uouF<<-^Y9mAot~C#CS%JsOhBk8mJh`JnU2kjjC%OUJ5?=r579w~3056pB$ zZvOYS^Ntf=?22Q*jKmYW`ncZwT{~Y)yC$cwD}0&F57TEk6Loph4%$tW_~K8V*G>5& zzxVbp$~F0k-MlVgu{(qG>pPrProyho?7 zYvSk?yLb-Y6SXV#%>DWzc15tBpLS(&J<_oE1^TNBxzAs9N3ZyW^^d6QA?={uM6pBc z;(ig@HGux?-+pGMKa4)h=ErAO9M?sU*v0xqWIdxj!jtrQ{;7neyvop1`_b%uxN(Z~ zTTc2?UOe~L&2Nxhyibgs_+l6L!O^a8%;vv+&a7V&ko)|S!gbLj>9d@Oy1Zxy?Iucm zv5Wg%BrN`_L4T$_d%y3U!mfd`i{(UQdC?xG&vR*+e(VbCm(-7D+gBQLpI@@LE_$TA z`2Nq$ulS4h5LsSLC%*WF`|oI1hw1;_Z2KBg?z~r&IPx=kLSsj-q|b69>hhu;w3`Th zr*U77gr&Ta&$j+*y?eI2Dv7WOb;x~wX*zl(eU=kZmly4z-9)iN z?Bcn7v}*+Y+3(M``}lLLKYVs2ab5HT`Gw_0dxR(H^SnF>OL%r~c%1+TEbtK;CyJr?5Nx+U3_2nMD40M@x?BFcZYU0aXs?A+5W6|3cCi5Uhxa-A5qss+CjUCVu#d2o(D|% z%4h!TugW#~iQT*|VJYWW-1;*IWI0z6_W84p>!Qb`<*kRbS9sI$JkC#`edm4t{ddYW z`H6kp|0-dzZ@_e}v3AnF7{WgL61XmUq`Y~~Ez=cwkln0@6(_#f#q%g7p4e5#_2Esw zGt=*MPGMKi(JSe*oQb-;X$S2liXGxlo|i)TV~<_IPrpt5$?LQ`@;vLu43PdTBkc2M z71u?NNy}T_v{!gyAHN4i`)(ioYc9c@+Q;j{7r*w9&RE$Oxz^h4voD70qDRV`=hiV@ zkq6n$@-8{?r}Yr)&?KJNRmJtec(%M-r?9Kz=#}(Y&O}|_w1ajN#SXD6tmY9y*IB>R z|4QBeAouwzgX^L<$S=H)&>p7G?@&ls{L+A)@pESTp&BdGUK5ZhnL8VtGZc zxA~@BJZFn`C2&3Y$Fp{2A@}*E!Qb`)1DKpJ&BH_!2-T`^p*|HAD3Hx0S3yt9s8NuT9R)a6Y( zXg5*p5P$L<6v{vSiPwHsuE|gQ$?Fmpe>Rc+5J-Q95|3Zr5nLBNCM|Dy(_Z0;eLQc3 z_GM1ir{DUN>tY|TOIYm7BAqIb_BBsoU)!-y%A4x}nXc#$vYX{SapH?z{N4=hiX687 z$^Fdi^H36UUwNl-o#{VM{xLsd7VjTon2+xOGnlUqV}7;;OkrMg0&H-e5A#<&U=H&- zLtq8-9uYj}*MV_7|8{{XJogQNWjs%ffi*lYq%dwC0xKMkV*JztmN@>v{j~$k;yyJ7 z*3dtP(GN9&S+wH`u+H{{@)`lFj-O5WhZ=aVRd?j3{2$}{DI(`r?s$bQ7x`=I?cO@8 z$ht^2|I(Y^An6%< z4~71yI~~`#^(Z0j;lJ7b#iTj?`A{xOzPr%x>JfYS{*B1>Vfk{o$Pb^1ow={s^uh}^ z-`~CB8Gkwd=C6NB^ou?d}7l{PwGw3cSwTbDSsd0_dF+#KI8B6T%Lq$ zzr0^gCLCh9i;a>F{YPZ^vfL6cw(mVNOV&@lzqj)_5?}1+cQbOhE^Zi^D#tuR2<&4 zAGpw#Ll@V{Z-U4AA^vjf6?r1(Pp<29c}-BtmHi@df^?$EeSZY;Sbta#M4yy1=c95? zd?P=Hex$#IZ_58%)*A`CerNeKp{L{M6CU+YZw=Rb4sY5{|HQV_B;?dPM%eY|w4Hrp zwq1)|qNnw3+dt`a8J{S8qbHPGvHnx-?p)Vjk`G-zb;N4{MPE=q*Wq<1VbMo_us)>0 z84qyNM%{@i*-J-jApbRDQ?Iiyns3Qy_-?f1oFf8+X5 z%8lR29yt1p-_E9gsh9Q0&7WKE_UwOw^+OaW_5{_t9@0xWJn?V&-`jfB#C7T|f#;?# z_E**Ygz3?4mS-37b$RAge5N-DNY5=#@+3X}g32rLLhBE=ybRB~o_%*~bvot|ohH4# z+i?YYE@}PZg@5qQA56zt;;+cpXP?{XAC02VEeF;|-p|$e;6VA0kv{c`K54IA$fGye ze2RS9PX5%|#d2VMVtgX>oIxIua`IfcksY}2^Zto=hnnBD^{C_6CGEt$ze+vleU19Z z;4@v(Cw}97lI1?2-WToXTl7&6G45O!UGkHDNvE3uPp3;B(`_Q%ilaBEy*2~%x#iV! z;s^QD9ZyI*qd&tp@8?(IF`q>CFO~n(&hxnUDbbVtkG5P=jvgtOQh9&eBmSN)^fSI< zzRTd(oOqINwr{52z;*3M>LJF#>neTJLmWBRr-g^|)9FT1)-O6;@|Z5mFA2Wrl=`5@ zO}PMl#!si!oOt4Yjz5TFlxy4J8GoMBL_1|Vw5L1E+Z(^}dJXk$F`{8=x3&vad^^?^uJ^4O9u9nR{_uUxAD(;qc_>{wD?u(6~|lF&j;`Gedrmg zbccUq)8%s_%W)i#ZqR+fwM)v0VPg80eZNV4Xa7ilaNO*UXWaH%bK(c-=lx#tE$xoq zr|Qkd^X`Yb?~cvgq(nA9_dXQ5)!JSEAF1@&g)e_wu1h&3PT2Ww=Ff-1mvT}4btnzJ z6(IGFZnEny>6gdTYpxyev+jSQ9b2w_Cmr!W`*)@@#&zBg#2)c~6Y}tj_sdVxWql{s zz)LthsrPZn*{?Ib^ek`hIg-~$D7UiW>GsU_+E6@>zuA7+4|N@$+pb5BJScx{*b}*J z-w%)1uHz0*>I=)E1U<}W20WIt_&umx`Mia4ImGYixz7!9f1qBX+nyw@{M`1(cHV;> zLuGdr^H43w$q(Od{h;k;eIU|qcRVQVbNmHcFWu)qu}ha*4e7Y!HSuSg@o{~xoCEBV z^ct7j@!4#82gm(P$IVxeT@$1edC7i#5W7O3N4}I@N$^~~LFLTxvy_wA-TX_d?}?VP ztKThW`lk&$ddluD(y2pE{y4zy>3!!d`}ZA5hxLv1Bb~N>(f660=RT7K-?cx;KRM^Q zE$BMOWAxt$?<@PzFY=)B9OF96pFDk^;&WX1j@feW{XXkyXpY^SSc=RLFsejR?qsKM9fOMw)1kOcQ{yWsd zeUy4cztlhWb41oZJs#en|9?8Uzb-`z4su$5}e+l z(D$uh-STqlA?@uWzV7#8h_CZE@}!qTJ3m!=sk^Ozbb3|9*Xd=!cZze`|7S2ip!GY@)zXyHthlmSIU{|V3-d5J`S+U9shG2$utG!I{O)xyS~o)?2E74g_EsmyW_rO zV)|v)-z8uT*aAxW;y3E0U2JEre(^`{8FswTLwwew&^-t1{gjV#eIos|>mTZM(>MPg z=vO$7sv&*JkMviGuLjqD`j`6qi0Ag}Vs{qn;aa#({wN@y(!S%rJKLXHzaDJgsf_iL zZr@=QpY<#YzUv3cAMKkRw;dcOwh=#~#x)W6C#S|^Jx_Y|(}Tu|`{}XX#9nUmr~S$I z8hnpHeiD40zsQ%Km_O@?ujg~e>i)*^YXzrwc1H1iEk z>K{zp$JjoJJg3IKmwu)5R({&goL2r>TV741|ApP!(ht`^^cRvZd5-Txp2c|MAAaLU zXKtPTkzbPQCcOjgjL*+R;YmFlLr>&h>leyX{e$Hv?J9=v+tVL>{$-dbdc+R;gQ&+5 zoIl`vE)jNwO0cWp*eCrz%ZE6?^&a168U@lXGF{f!F?g<>LF16|w;7~c0$=hcJo=BkBzW~1-hThibURE}6yYcOSih*RhVmWG=-Y4idpykVh40(1 z2cnPZk;nOlgyPY^ERQnlr^A!_Q%%@pLydN;$ z5PJsSu;Xv~jrpY=L~*gC!|^bY?TPhRcqYA2@>SN4C7{S9y)x2c{h;5N4#UEi^e89l z_R)g=fs>BJqkTlqlNCHM}LxEr(b4x`|XJOLfPPU&UQ&&oIGaG_%Epa#*l6XeDSl4i!PRb z%#ZnY)C87u(}^$TR1c`X=J|2&JQUGwbRH=8-jD73o5`%cz4{rxf4|%%KJ6lQ{(k@Y zRO&VBTUy0qJtKx6v+;cOt?I;=dF08L?0Q4Vhxqjh`N#a|uNL@SC!W;5XIa|ba~SQu zT*>=RJkig1tS=>8pD3Qz!}^za&A#76-=#>8`V!ESo#CBvi1mQ=s*3BhThz$?i1P;I zwa9abk}i4l(-7s{chZ%9r~M+^?=rd%C4HHfh<M7&8sF3;`Q}bmamvpX{fAEuZw4J?KJ?HUxVBpBbFVsW7v~hjn@T5NTeMRJT`{gP2 zg*^6ML*onv*;ks?vu9t$k&AuQL;Etg-f(zgAKz279eI%dlej)`cqW~__Y_ybZq}#q zEH9+5H{hq}>-YU4cC#L^-etf`IXtmD26@SmOFhh8VCy06(B;dpm>ZPO@J~Gb3hLRw zNl)t2jmS6kQ9m*IGyC~7cAv-dx8jam@=ZM~FV?5D!;^foKII&_`<4>-${Hcf61m!xP6N0XrygkZ!J0jnE#aFGL(!df>^qPL^T$ZndgYBT>7%U!3}^Q2eCcjr%)UTi%$e zN9e~W_&Q%9-&Hof5=&!)$G)dJF!d~w_>>6m`#wAP>5aq#e3ThF?;ylwq~ z-}?F2$@S@d0D4a4_sE8|Ywx~q;=6uhJs(0}9DGSf>fh*3gY%IAPy4NnbFyadPY3Ti zEyRDK_noe?D~0t1`o1#?u*=wZpkL-ZW662XCVu6*3)inf@qPE_&d=F>?$tN!*9W;j zbKJr9&h>My|AOx0UFezR9lSrcz#Gk^dvLy(>qR0Dy7nEMFD^k((&0_--}s()3fGyR z9C)ss!tegr)?@N`U8B@Dacqa7V>bU$prjwvE=I5? z874!`vdZ* zhhd`dWjw=i9PJZ1e{!AULF(Z(L8I$HyGb6me#-)dCwi!#=-MHA7$!EI_)@<8?rcAU z^u6!Zwu|NM+w(iS!sAc;7sENN6X<_r>j#lLHokbLa3r1hrnSF!%YOYA``HijzCfLV zLH6gMhu8W1P2@UxJul1sq0Ljo-N60$y<++CQf|8E3pDX1b^J6`zg5PlB$-M3rmbN$Errn&kWqoWp@kBr4 zv7A!4-d8-Whx5AO@_znBALoCmFAP128QvL(m>=4e#dX>(*%5tup16l{sw#ba|3ZB& z>T?vDayyUn$?pCblg{aE*Q7Ug?6_#+q!SCBaRzz3|3u!npMR+roX<)+a-;J=d!>HK zr^L%)yi-0!ywO|s$7^nWT24Ii+f}02{8$ckT<U2EOH*KYUbKOLUt_ z^b_Yp`wq{o2O~!=>9YKZHC&JE&g6Hm9&nzX?Jz#e+ndMd^$7H36z^*IkM|MIn^$Ie zr_ujilz$iH*K~NspHE_X^e6K}9>%X9eZe z11~enJ20=vbrcncC;1CQPt%dhxGog2<2u^Q`2qToDA|(n$};lDc7os(>z@Qr_@al08ZjN$4$;FfvEsxx`8|{h7}trM<1qJqi1Z`3I)(=6AI<9DyAMqq zx!8RN^sv1-Y6JVHL}kBzh#ibC@g#h+qd@FpJ0zA7zv}3b^5%H2?#M;oywXSi5&I6` z_1Dmmi=Mkrp(lEBKVM=G@7r-lE_&{A^ho#~CmfXD9O9Q9J#K!hj$HJy9*J5Bzx)*X zyNKU+^oahw@vkEnefKJT^yB|U*|&hbc9i92^KY_4w?MogQ3TSntxc`9DW#B7DygM5 zfQ1wUf{3J+N)SrJO;UtoKrT`A5Je=YXuJ}Sx2We5MKFM3yvNJYD5CKK1`bFLDh97- zeVO-N>zi-Q`jh5)+S&h__q%^HYu2opSuD%1@cqE?a8+FwK2JA%7+;nh;8XWwjE{SU z-!l}yi2p@1RWJPz>)F1>s9z|YjF+hw+cWKYD){sIO3?{_(y<*hS^rImKLls_aJ*bI zIQp6V3gFlFa3^`jn|cjUPrXHLk;^;uq!b`I|vMQP(3s+>3nZp8@I@894g2hx)a` z$+(~VIQ}oZDzRVM5yx>=bzSslp0lJLlq2fvcHU9+;;(1IJ}E-}m?*sV$4p(9ydWRO zXNdZh!igSy9@whuAv>C=Fa6iV50RXB9BA*CRUdbTacd$^n(%ka!=2=Bfc=b5ANBFX zPE;@UF|TM}34A9Wzq9fEkhmr8b4!DxT=pX~;C2Sb``G6}PtI?Zzd7-X#PM0Emm=iP zF7T;-5YHuj!|yi3FXFlXv79Tsge;)gY!cSh>^em?sO_uO-D_?;!= zLVKh-y06{)^!j_{?gAg`Lq2j@{La5wR$iOf9qF03^ZG(3dH!7a2Yw+weZz;(H$!z@ z_`HlvqB6v1q4452j@MV}y6}04;v;{*T>UM4+5T7-U+3&BqZGLC=krNbT^D|LD}M6# zi`3sC{$0@b6(7xisICjY=NWzx&;5_(QsE^o^ygY#7e22#z^C+jFTSxqE9$!N`6k6j z{{Ck5cgWs0=(~!KwzsdY3%^$%;5P?8%YRG5@A-o*iMD5{Qa#5_%A`fR(ym%p9i<k;rekQ*X_;o$pN&YUQ*9i60TdGAa z^ML$ji0j4d>*3Pl|I&X;{6tqv+<0H5{sr)@E4(}>aQs4C2ldPo;VJxxqyIUM9vXfe zUy|P}gCB9^$MN=B@soJ2FwQQ#DX~-HN&YMs7?;n1uPVI6b@Kv8PdwXqL*Zl`&vT0G ze*7MA+AooQ`N|)r*L#S+tehq2?K;JRp{GAK8S)x9pYG85A+D3N{UDz^D5pMjerchU zc#Ge8&Su}go-YLChuRmPm$|+SeDgeCZ)NySK9KgK_;(Pv9+JoXre>Xa{9MrZ&Ln?? zZ|6w9JeQK|Sm+-w=p$xG5P|I4Uv7@Xz9aZ}&m9^k~q>m3THpLn?R`J+qJ+x+}&!*2oq>ehuJ7ocM+QVA%z(>)}rF_l16xJIatt9OYKQZ|?C+);|(g0&Zh) z_kmpEa=;b8TgNy3e!7Nw>z8we-yH3+t@uTGcV?je4(0a*bW??s{+8!|(ofWTu5i-d zHqZ|3y6FvY%xh6s+U@jyZl2}Py4?C(oL`Pzm)infaet{?A%-uhu1kSF?ef8FWF{Y&(3=v=ZWj^{hCJpH`5-uF0v+4Ew?W`8N$ z#{hWihmEb7#)V;nTR_}0mY46KyXS6@wKcO5a{vnR?SKz<(<;43COQXbZ5v$brb`H9_ z!b!WV-00}256hOqiC_6W3j2M7K5$C?eSE1u`SE-nd(M9j=e6*B9^Q{u0lwl_n}3WK z<i7)_^NO6m-*BHUfUt^+BnDCk7GK2$Dm)_lEgv$#_!ycp8Cx)c^%0U9Q9|MxG!jK^qQle zwfjIf8G20@>2adSqa6CX{(Vkw8=uW*`t6kX7Vz2+;Z9v7VS zBU8v*qm=6+Z;5@8wC9jKwmZtJKEm0p<010O-|wzBQBvOc(at``>oj?CAJOv<;&+Zq zD1Q$AJl9R+i2Nb0FOB@g1D$-@aY(*?o)G!xML_hU{QBFSo!plqbt1or>rIq$UHn}< z>*UjpL-O_Wg~;bPkMif>&wZ z>39f^c}`q$?DY3>$#V?jyMw$M@J?=$x8yeguB~v=KGxVz+Ce?}4g&JU&VJxLHn~0z zTo3t`{$y$W%NbR{WtP-=$qLe(c|ysMr0X%zx4UZ2ukL{O6_gdBMXVF1hc~ zPdoT&X7r=qiCY7=Rygs0+xU(46n;1zfAMqqnJ&)`o!`&~z3-1if9l8kb`N;*yXZB3 zx4RG9`}R0PulYxhyKnD6Z|~c^tDRkTTvhy$upe?C4$EUZqTf59*XLmE^A+dPQl8i? zdBy&Q^b^qAbBsn8oW5+IS*7rmJl=p$>KvMUEEA7Iv|IF)afsd*CUK#E7@x+EIX-qD za3SM+S}owU9MLOx56+d9IC9=p=S{>j^?b&04Er~+OX&HXlO6Pt>tY}KC$|6ck30MH zI7|0?^dHX?uK`bf?Dyz5jvLzs$9np84ZQ{mw~yaD{q{!rQ{c2;rG3@We;k@GDZInk zY3EDYpttiSW#Fy6xj8>W{2+Sdg8fpuzvpw8e_u%YOWHex{0U0>n|>s&hx(<$?fX@u zC-FPrtX&oJTxaDmUz!u=NBewi=hrE(1H6^D<^ARB96!qAIGFTv&>uVhwgO)Gi66Q+ zPr=T=<$l7+wR*J!=Nw3UZF?8~(fIMq_-@zVEb$%3pL*|IfA#9mddwqOKY*MD&hPlt zFTLgBpM3wFzs~vz>Q_0(=hatVa_j8M;%`fRq+90q)*3H;X;(1v6FnB-vq5>|M_-cr z`zJo+O;Rs>*zQ^KJl^Ju?|SK7x8L;w!SN^jivQjDr;4(1#pNHm>+09-_ZJI4<{?YI z4{cmUE>5pD==&(2_r8liaM{V5|5{MO=YD{*Wc;7^!k4`C$ia(anumR;Eo`KIhwF^T2Y=y>Z~UHze&hGDzVwsMt}Wv6i@l3}_+vN!{8veR zq))1U)c1;!EkY3yeYMzf``mLfDy&7gdI7=_yPqX6P z_~`@w!g+mWe`mZdYoO@Gk9<$3&)*B#%X1dZIeM|ZYsEK2&;3(bc~JhD#I9&ul)FY8 zgkOkX8~Cie=qi5Ve|!FmuogMjQb<&Wp!si#;y;9eOAJ=IM+YrCf&pJD^@}`1% zp%=a9=G>YrzMRj=%A3C88`6vW*DX51%O{je*136f8fiB<2UlJ=j#DEA->$lm$lz+tN4cKyFI5@)_%I`&n12l zJD*A;qcZyYqOPi!_vozW{VL{7S%;em=2V<~5#V_|;Kw`4Pu)+Y0{gc>K=B`!i|B9Jrx}JIO!6$em@# zC602t;J5bposIXe64wH*@C(}BvvEFCzdCSLg_C&SWc165cT3Spyh%s?Iq>fr+>Ita z8?^tKhdaqX#^|v|y^YTez|sB*_!a(#Z$J4F*8#3-aMv6Cn!vRTj{R|LFK~SicarCQ zfO$JXy|sfl>NiFIzx4Q>jrW67?g+S@!SOyvTm!iB|MdNGwXwGVTtnd`FRn82$jXbZ zqLaKJ9rak?em*j|D~%pg;FcclB!9WlV~2X{&ntkVKfB;p{$IZR|H~SNz|;y%&t!K5#XIyBIjmYj9m| z+u$B*_|?I0;Ned44+f5YnWEnMg*e*5_qr>OU;6x=9OUL^+TQefqzdY_+gQFd>7B2v^%(WkWC-viffcCJo?@dU@{274nSn-!UBww3{D}$pP zmYko>{j#%L^cDYX%)Be*SAe7b#CQJHonuA5EQw<&c=1yoe6r?gDQ^m#Ugse8l7DP3 z-d`__9Xa#7#yD>ScF6Ni*?gx^^wsjHSL0pIUv}OzXXq)f4ZQY)__==%)|o}~S@HWv z+AsR?C-rQf>_=E9rPSMgL+ca$JGE}0@kD1Qzc;jj9ffzh>lKv3U)nwSQ$Mbk&~n7? z(No;~W&`x}(*S>KeDv?k?|a|y;uqg`w+N4ZGT%qKHTc~6rSCcOrI$Z{4-r0`=VZzD zb?5VMy0iOI$4U4Ueg*cS{N$g$;`NhPyzL^96Y)v)2ej9`cZv4PIzC;LLa*B^^J#?o zgL(c4$8W0mi9hXkOv!fz9Q`8lCC}-9f89X(J%4rXkN5Se2?qUy5HJ+oc_nYcW44nKa4ZZ&65)$OPA zUPu42<$FK!AN9AtSg;{^Y(M6HnjeCGic;vs50uY*SfO6uKjl8d_oiD#Fa03>L3-iK zpVad@^*;9|Kt6ef3uXzpuESrb=UUX z$tmQoGxXs7@(^FXClH+Yk$h{vn&gA{>4E^FAN}e6a{m{-X$Q-mq7T`{?{)EgfN&D| ze1APt^pa@Wa-}#ovQt|G@ParA1=5jw8A7rr>J%D{CDj`FBKpGSrU z$9VwCEr8$5!=;~N*QjSciCSU@=L_h+5&Fx*Z}|4I-==-ydnel`?SbN2y0WfD?PTU%G>O@q5UgIrJSW zoX&5~M^fIz$HnL2vYzMqEPdP=`n`)dw;*@t<5JH@+>c!TEk7^#oW=a%JVQg_bpO#+ z*F%0NL9da*i664|yG<2N#uM!C>lo)yuN81Q-jQA>{F~zriH}^TAMJJi%~J4kzbn;n zjyl#){Ki$cJnHG6{P({CzjM9cc7EeHlyt?9xbX|`lfU}dFWcSxb&r3!)JM9d_F;3q z1mDMV9R%d$r;xKmDc9wGr^iRq9vC;;S^Aw|dq}N|u4LfYACX@(1IKs}*UP}!{$>oE z*u$UX74K^cReze__&%EZj)hmmC-z(6ca!`Uzi}KUIPsfp_f6m*3NbY&e}Op z^2t!!IaT$i*~#&ceecfv*eX79AF%hI^6xo6=>5&22m7-c>P1JAgiBm6k~!XuWyAq+V4Y7vE1=p98;^ zhfC|-SM}6e;zIk_zD8)*6NQ(2V}C@sOI4rnOMjnW2b`b3$$UQZxDC1G-`9Rgzei}G z-twdV20!-0F~94b+=1c8=Y0BQn!%4a^5gw@rTEExa(FK{@5uc?<rwC$$=wG>~ukLZ3_{KxpvzCQ3HMW_4QiMk%LvyS?u!s&jC zey6;RkBgsESzkeY@&6?L5xuk8UCrRwPRMVKc()DC=0EdwU~tT9@|%O-RN*AA2aj=i zZNGQ80*-klaTR>^sSbb4cP0ftf8z0Y$+NBb{*%ZJwV&Z1J3rg^DE50+%$o`D+8&Wt z`EIA5-X|E!7e1FUk3}y{U;2}9-06Sr1GW1wIUZ{ndYgaT$Ew?z&i9d`59!}W{aoR6 zzT5m;`MCJ`Cboz5E8lMBC&x$ByP|NSH|=h!>mj}AcikUozYi6?enh=FkJD1P{r&eDuAOrKFa6O6F0vv1 z$^EzecggpWL?7bWu2!J4_uu;3U$;v9CLl+~E#%9R`ny2Gtxygt=eF_BIr~ zY$EP;_{jWs)72gm&-(#5XcO~&x^x{YEtI*%m3i0K86!U$j*xuS-p6)O1 zgUH&K(K|rTeHq-B!2IO7ZZkt4*|7hy7G5o6F*E0Mr7<>B}{D`ByTih2W9>4VWK3Bjk4UX%LIX>gMwV%uP>Vi{!%zpjT%ueTnd-ujb%WVygNXYTP!)^Rc3)Nf;O zc3xuue#H;__VT%sa=XCQ435u@#Bp76+u-bTMHBo624~07Rp6!yC*$KW#zRHaQ~nA# z#$TGB9^djh<=A@Wx31rhbH3V*Q_MVCzKrh$=y@=?Pf{Q98~mN~Z`Qom81V}20Fxc3dt<_F_G zQ8z2A7N&Fh3 z=W`6752!Ecrw8cyJY=6MNWVQm&+$Fi!C3j#kDjhSpXajH&vX^Nw1M=Dq%O}47865i~@~gwY#gF^;vp-^-$**Q`w1@mE;MewW z$$S^Yp%khUTH+vqCSzuEQ7(*R!P%XIq_e=!c!yYTnUE_;5_#GHq~c$a|JdddAS zK3C~czMp6h>ARpWUFYNIPwL0>zy`q6{xQzW8bc2GP6K-F=gIQUU(`3N6#g>r$9Pc> zuD>Up;P&^8PdNQ+DCN4yYnty8lg^fckFI_Cto$STv83GFp7R`65&d7*)s$a>`x@l^ z!MmPz_iH})lOGe1_K^MdWPuub@h-96A()%D1Z)Oe%~Tub4i z{ENpUw3B65;lz)#FLCzTbGk;r(Vt?!;JHtL^T^DL&^gtSKjV39woBo|pV-4ZV9E9G zJlC=O|D0b!=Q@Vy`M!hqMb3BeKFfJT(Lv%l#{0ECBK*nVLQy!b`*TH|~z+b=8v zc8FfXTb*8q&Mz$ggY$#lMzU)6x8UTySO_WZ&&aN56-Ug!FM>A$BCKDys# zzRo~z-*dDLJ@L!1ynOZX&JTM0tLNMC`N_q{$s1+J zE56tH$I6>#$g2X+br)IwEc}zR%bo{0#q%5K>CZCo*1mPdd5+8z()U1b-*e9mJ^eq- zkk<~JD;MdMxi9A_FMaXzUie(`g1fK8`hUvVpMOoQa9QW|mrK3y;r)Xp_sKo(g)hD1 z#V@=qbuL&1d>Savz54M_|JZxq@oSXV!}ZbiZXM0C;i3PyqBP#cfiGdiSVLV`EQPEm(70;=h61TF7Is~b%3|>_})XW zUl98^PNKeZ&}a2eyq|M?x&oelDB!yo_PplY&e>u0YMXQJg-^)uEzsNit{ZyV(GAFx z@oVR!r@!xAP|gibU)nX#=m%E;ITBynZ)Vw5{d73KIlQN|@ofOF{TTf_wVv6IFB)H$ z*c0g&?_1OR8>8#-x^3o#=q=aT-{|Wy?y=90g6B{4qMj^E|B~n-?}^wC2#w&m&XpzS zE6lt{p84ES{6h4cH?i{;d_Orc^t6*D$61`Wu;Z%vpSgCtQGCQM`<%pi2Ign!U!5PS zD8+usdppmt1mC*Bah`$vhQM_^TzWnF5cP})<+5GJc7xx{Y|MGvF?g#3X#kZ;G<++7=lCFn( zZI3*EvwtCOn1N&d5H}0pbX?a;pOBwws4x6yVz-X#1#x)vqr9?@i}$^KME@ebBWCUG0H^I0`S$sm_pM{k z4WAqN_PY?w%S}MO_^ZD1%lj_lKwhlpxR`#>^^tE=^Q${WFMhgM6pVfxFS)9)oAtWMs6F3{ z{wE#B=RKc39{&x^b)FAZzANefL;Be92=&=0e$u~OfE~1RiTc7h&z^W(SXS3XF2{o` zXP|E=TqGwR7ux)4`?xdIvjskU?>X>rC+GMa!91O!o_-ax#6CWkFyG7IyE6QE-yy$T z!P)QgJ2^)`5myP~lJf*9ca8jN0`K%o?;q_2`JJ5OeVlT~L0qz4h;qk}yYS>D&qL(L z`^r|~WL&NLk5IfhZ_o9xVwdDU8mkBj>&;&-?& zEIeHL{<2l|PUHRkF7^H0()m!kNXD6z%kg&|c;Okk|8-QomTSjn!wk8^Q7-p=&J8vZJLMiO_4C&&HFGs-J_xb!%pq3X4L=r{n}5ooAVdN&+_|$KH_Sh=WD>}xQbubz#sE` zD}L4cWkfIP!}dRi9J_9*_*?#Sdz=>;dUdh?@R;=sV#g5cCE8!%@{9b(_*>f@{X4ae z#GaqZbtHv%JAV56pc3~j4-6O1F1v1{^ni3fAbJgvM~ChMUC`Tpa*q9}wx1ki$Xmc~eBUT~>vqEaWDR;d zKQ%G*%!^$>p5!r~b6N6zCC>pC`QnEOzI$l>VB^#KT<1p}AIS&iQxo;nYly#fJ_w%Q zi904=L-DWQ;quPjC+A<`@{Iiz^QH8_aQrzxd+6NQF6fUvH+BHL_*d*L<2$+bdv((c zz4~T7iSP;KNulKIvg==J*E&Bi&zM(b;B`DCPuRX#a{i0Y%X}Zj_lSI7D|$)(bicsK z>w!P@Wq(KcGt}$;E_%*Ny+2x#k5W|Z=kpW!t*>!;up=IR;`oBN{#zZc{CUn_)Q|bi zJgGjy;Ti@B-kq>d?H&Qss2m76R>Ny8anZ5UK8S7pSwa?P$hudf2CKsQ{ zlbn5QpH<+kyw;@-f9PE40qBoCS9%P*_+R|c#yQXS`_YSlUNXKI-*x)BlJbL`{dU}D z&x5DGtH5jfMUI}w(d~|L9e~b`WBR`l9>uK(Ahkk&i(u#eio1u$@~=8m$T$Jl;?R5p6J>$ z*E5SgLdW|(OZMCB&jlxb<2beP5a$=UuKQW~p^JKc2S9Mre(TS1{X`M<#1HVd_M716 zfA8$){W-=z&e@T|-|qMyGfs%?IoC1cBih5fqrdA94fhjkb3O<0E#S3&;=i0ZpCn7( zl=7~1cG7=qv)+yVSY*hnf2Q+C*0`N^mdnmQ+kVTSx96tSfY7{#ZXufTtg-zv}u0 zJ3d}!=ruRrXCa^NMJ{f%BdZjAWM8g+!TE{fWb$cXy*ueSj^*Dh1t0zUQ~Z7cOTIV0 zhvVqn0Q$^O3V-R3*$=VIeIeqD@v6h6$I&I=L`nW+yluz5^$Z;Q6P6v|?0$CohvOrT zkB8(N3D@@(;<~ig;MiZ#-tLoKzqvLz+Cf|e{0f&i|A@^Zm*W7+<+!|RaI};C)NbtL zwiHhK#j(jh%I^cG+`YfgF0fu(=b6NT@>p^lWc|x}>a~KLt2(=mAK&lO-$URhicWC!GxMc^`k9AIzaL(s z-o}snmMOOiT%nTa8`%-B6V~f6L?5myIZ$R-2Fc@gp}esS6#(k{4Ox`ukOGi1*Ya@q=~rb#l z4ZP?tc{9bli5<5OfYbgJKa3u5-1F-i^g91VUK#geo2R=Bd3KzZ<@e^5&JT7TeSq_o zIc{TKbb#0PNj%yAFpoISoT+v!{V>;+&B2Fy*?yekXg%*D^z6rT)ui1=x}@&M8}P3v zob+E6jF;GdQQx|ci{HPqp6AAP437N~+avWJDxAcxi}mfC{~_NQaN3{J?w2nRX}&$tC&H%YAt%s#i?Rl~K1$)I^NjvrIZ`fCZ;4Ytv4c4JsRg;EMI^j<` z#y^Mpp}|=`%%_FH+4E{Q@Y~kIrO(|h)tn!wx2P@obdAx!PMiXY9mLU36UglVFKi^A zZU8^x6q{f^%@n=llRaNR*hM^2{nG$>v3YrtA3C3k*Cufndg{Tlr}9eZc&>8O(6K*c z+3h)bS@||l^pbDwyA%Dyk54fEnF7C1bdqn61J35#&F1<_(FuRjG2gnZe^lZR!C5}c zx0=D-1bO6F1HZP1JIUW*^ctX^{+4RVw;K&^N}K|Ue#9}4cF2>Jk{gkv@}dNPr{c46 z_m|3bi64ZXVp%R#yrR4~e-8R~6rJdIE3Q+&=`&rN2MQ;7#qs^vzaI0gzQWIsrx?CX z+)vj&eLU{psp}zsEKpy5bYgd;e?0Dgl8Hyn$K`B&6a3l+cMJG%9Mhyf6i)mx#W;DY zu7~vQ{#-^oLman;p7CQjQ+|~=a{pHKde0BJXBdAoj!lKraqRflW4^Oj`Eh)v;mbHq zeEK+!b9FuBk0I(e3a8`vbQ8zim-%+u`V#n54DP8JacnA__@n&&&fcDX{rm;cFTdIM z$8E+R^z+Q8kK4=AzaH~#^?km#8@}{&@iB@0qA#D5E9!d4&pXI%DxCK7vmx&UWyiZ$9ZSM=Zh$Flf_gnwjDEO(~pq(6PWk;^!)6i&x+tFDLqF-CpqhQw|i$LB&G<5=}^ zIa}WVzm~z>0X{a4eT5Ufi+GNnsO!=AAa^I|r3l%v0X{3PJH=1v>35cW6<_iHV<4~g z<(^-1FT!;j_m;wm9lW1))%B3vVuswQqLaA4#K>jbmkOujzERgjF2`joN2o8}=-C(F z@9u&;#=YX>a<;whW)_+yx-0-|FOk<#>n6}zREq# z^%GOz<_ahCLh(72Pjxuv=>|CFyQn95MSn0pTwh@42bWKC^L?DpA-;Z-^N;2m#WTM) z^NEzlI8v_>=qK+;`ai7~aXe3d3cTw zd#wGr-wV%=)`8dd@8{<*&(C>V>J>VtRs2^b-HBv99)*{Y>Ito`ZU59ayE| z{9yM_Z%c2Nym280N=LaFVDI66+zK2 z=7W0LDRqJ)AL8bUk6`2{a*1Qf{nQ(U7aZkMPwoRQK0dKu;=p|xBlw4WYrtteCC|3+ z_xlOzMZHNs1igK4xis|DZxWCf$^JC&=PaoY$IT)?>i5p%o{-oj{a{7?E&j0j)lhHy z!HrojMSB{+Q@+R*e{9~F_D6I*KF^ABfzM6f=h{Wq`QDVbggpJ8Q1Zm~gB#kZ6cc-y zzx3}6xZ+nPei9t{QSKPHn!(WymVA%dRyfJ0h4BaZ4uDf??(c7{mGhrn4-qAz7xp5Rv({C<)8 zuw=ZLPh0TexJ9l@zsC5Jj&g0O^$pRHo^nZFd!nC5l*f3NQQtK<%ZK0HofsVDu;jet zQsKm3v-t)Nk4Gh zvjSf15XWu`5(Q)IxIp~kJ zA9&h7{WYgo%Klr!_D}!e^!++5&{_NKd*;~wfE=;EjdRBjjW6e*KX!b%0-pBQu#Vr3 zFLO^$+b??Aep>iM*W-0?eVnf<*Y*8`_IAP7k5~HsGypCh*nuDW0rG1BHzgi8<~^Us z_#K{=!b$#5%zcOVf!tHV_H%#yp}4d_e{5X3z>D8RuQJX9v~d|_=ruC!OZbTY=?D62 z3wk@g>KS_aq3~5E^yjE`#kwOf80QMw3qY?(A$1ybG?(t zxD&q)$kTSvk31(x+bwnsvHsA`d(@uc?A3M%K6elHt4cd8TsXZQ&LPK+Gq%6t`-}E2 z1A2*n3;51bRy(AhD_`yGvgejm&3#yy1zY{&#=5{|kTmg=JsS zhvd_5W?x9WKWVP$MXz|@66V=Ove=t5=T6~zj9>pnGT$81BVK=}_6urxjju`kDA(Iq zFS*9L7m*j@%k!SH)_08+-w-|5`7M4X(O>JeK0wd!pL0E!^-K9#zFqXMUMD2-xW2J8 zP4p0bqyP3lmIGBUbX-3)RC1#BauL@H3Gr#`dbn?l?RBB}NWW&+^-NK}GPs+ansMIt zP+$Do#D2LiaNQf_)lhHu8{TC2wZX4#_}vH``3*Ao5y$q=@3K!lerMx#WNd#8+Uwy? z@_fHVxw&UMJFOkWQ7*sBUIAXz7eCW4#PPfAO@p)R`U=pmr*IPQYmHx+KQ`WDMJIZY zj`nli;KJbSdcXzSN!yS2RYs2r>aCx+&W~~j;Mer{CEu?nuJJyTsao{(bG?PVyIw9fhw8w*%s62fyE51zy-l{#|V3Zg78UdAO52`LO-< z19GJu@P0~MRy&v|{!zbr{=v{=c74(xNBZ5%zPI7N-NNlje9O`IYKY@|k+Q0new*tV z8tQtaTdKb&e^E#G_x%HOdi|$okD?QQKf(BWjQW+riCnH@+N$fKFW-}}?4Z8%oWviI zoOm4s{lR!tecT!PeT=v-5to*ai}yQ|59e$92FE;SyXb)L#KWEBdColfEm3dV;{)L@ z=3fQ;b{@avd&`th{mOTEeo1{_VDRTI-x>x-c`UoYbq$Vo636%aBZUjajr-8KjurWK z{ywmGqv&=17Qa5RC&ZWj%;H;D^wIbrwg0q(`iOV@lW_#+|H;1}!0Ei5C^;cLE2v*8 zoX*=@Af56yJ}zhLw=Z>ZEIv2!PsHyG{n@+I)z9JAnvYApPviU4w!v{8f_lyW(D5B8 zoIFRC@%(PjU!DTz`!{)?8}r3_Kz(kW&Vxe7vojtClAiDH7H0gIL zKJ0HPZ{XwNeNwEi|B3U{)ZiE℘4GQaEjQ?s>l5Y%6Qh`jFif)OQq4 z+ns6$J}%B9>cjn$6N6(O(QfuvONEm>s$yLY=bgxR2b|6$!EbTC5b^X+*18?LFHV|W zWN$nlP5S;fIKP*1{-WUa^CcPk>PEn8{h~PJ+n8U;n#Z8LE$HohVjuK&KC$q8r=O8` zu4vBZv-Yw7Zi7BGPqPTm)AYjf@~zJ~{e2kaEkW=qHv1qcrHJ{r zsb{Q%YXGnFXWx(Wyvi?k{TK5yt3B~t@`LApL*CKne-j@ifV5BB4>3=QFLZV@Ppaq- zQs;jIr|p&Y$?p~E^%oK5(>#xmCG+#nmnEMTj^@+OlwaZUe**rm{P4rx@!XFO-Y@z@ zd{X0AuIJ)-NN{^SK)+S?$o1K4f6?XfAGvr4UdA!jAG~jB`vhn2TaCNY?M3{X8aD&i zMd{=w=hHGTN~j+hoW0NS+@-m}(GKz(!v2lH+4~3Yo5ijle}312_XEbQ2AuYf__vAk zlx_b^{i)Zu?fie}{Qe>2OpIPUC*Pjmzs%5!_cf~*{Xo4cFLL(V`$jQiT}K^w>xXq< zzpK74vL76Q-oBT#`>(0rG(+ChoQKc+V!SA?@M345mDe`(lvf7c*mtgP-kWC0>rtM0 zkJvW!)Nhy}uWQ~rX35)R$ZHyU%FDeZ-F_vH>v&&xC|_EjxB1cry&Y$C!}1Eu!v*dW zw9mGi1?bJXztnTs8aUy@U+6ik@Y1yX`u@N?;PXrsc;OlODObRAQOmy`+oQjGCw%F5 z@*ROrKW9ik%e-YdRs6L*wx3-Ar}I_!$CS(O_2gdW>=&NmAKSlIP;dDWM}G8AQ}Gl3 ztiRFqb3Olhy#AB>A4Gm6BlW#-z7NWHFBSWFsrZY%94}G7+&4NqYu}~sd&zgwh?{{= z33&J=6_2{A7mWNwF70953a@qYItnj-w(~bb)LTCjNBtPLnc>HJ%3WvhBaS8GR(N@m z2NJi{w>Z74>Uta{}$# zf&SR%gkmr8gXq=8^NU?KR|8J#CGqF@gZ6UWt38*gj{cwPUYW1M0AJCgf%A2bS$8A& z#bcd+j>V6$&V=I}`Y&sozQy-b4vo`$cf+4&62FR{*ss%1{O<0Mc(f<$Pma@P3McmN zu&&FF)7QZ1I7$BGZgKuObY6e$6;AJC&+BgjFa3e&HRgJVA9U@2e(eFL^@{$Txt^c< zq=j$vJbGrS(ZrC-_J3g6`Hu+MXqKMy~jmw?y$iJbXur?1!OX2{uQj6eDT zITD}pZ~A(P-66YHl!y24f)l?l&AbKuzRi#~HqW(I9_bsebbhq+IDJD;d>eS}N3oCX z?a=sY26{WbnrEyFTL$DwUNIk7^8Lp%pCy*MpX62LRY^OQcsJGGA^*2gZ}X~?kyl;d ztv}{R#(P0|Cf;2`Pyeqop$#zt0wT)zBSe#ABy*c^33<6 za?sa~r{`Jn0_$Hw@hg2Z`UT_9xuK^&tH5jfqJO9MpYgj%6?{LwfwF^A?{^E)b3TLn z*mw>t=R2DIynMcgb@U79CmAjFvj3z0g+Ah`=mlrT(Yzm(ffs(#uT(K_IDj1TZ2+hJ zBKX8Sw-Bt?|;{+Mj=V|GI=6+un*8KiPa-2lSHuhu_6M^xc8ltDV1&{q8^$ zc={{%H?E!8?+)~U)AsNC#Sc6Dp?0zaeX3ssy=^C(40%he>pLW`{u<JQcmQ~bG6)wvAcwGkNuv{pdw6iAq=^^|;{kOmwz4C3d zPtMtu9!ED`k36}>`B88pZ+hO(OXhJKcq`BD$8qw~=d`n*x9d7+H|?51&Jrc{YCpu+ zi}+nYFR^2Q_I1qniKM@tUg7v3YG3^~gxlBVmt6m0+t&zq>$eK_)9Cjr(jPMaXx|p} zMblsNdq;MEYhmE@v-0@Lm#3pQx;V&n z$v57QX!i>B=6)2i{=1IO<1S6S%d((I3Qd|5D*Qd_ObJ^fSLFR8=_Xuc~OL_PL`4ob5mAyVJiTJ_Q}` zd*TO?voYuSQ?GeIj`Sa^hr9mc(DO~{zd5^)eZHvzPrWLbceKwpE#S2MqSxH)OJkg^ zzo($L?YVB~8OKFHp7^bg?+qS%Kbd2`@=*WQe3SE=?cdg*=lzcQb%59Y*z1RLrH+}W zmitfVi%;K|zl9u|KX%_R^CvexVMvtslA>^7ws^tZ@zVV*z^m zJ(51wk=geN>kN6NYmU3W*1psE=h*ve6L_|dG5lcfuRY*&K1BacJqPgIB>VmCG2Wlp z_}G4M7tmkwu6!BnM?Lej_+9CI5Pb8VJs0O^=oi>8vYp%Kxe?^q^Y86Gb<%U3MSWMG z*XQ4hz60#jrhl_a;Tz?9uJmSScjsCD_^|ar=O^ahAwF&J89qDV6N+ntIFzt2^Z9P# zW!*uh83g+I^qguUA)e!jJm`*VxZQJs0La zO*wq7XW980mmfTz4D>PIi7zid3GfwvO|TDrq1KIr{KEa5+&@Wq^h@b`62FLjw0r!u zr{{6uKiznS=k}8?{nJ%^Lwa!^Xx4t$=>huDE1iCAoFi@JZxy}x%YGM0@FBgpzcg!~ zXydJkze4o&I^lYee zwzZud#WzGBpF^$QLuvYnqK~e}aa}zv@oR`L`~RhXu5cXJ-1mj!s?V7Y@$F+B6VF+O zzv8&I6yFd%&pBScA<z<7&l&2iKc5a9{aK{_9>23W@*{4CaYf;W68puDrx^X#z*PQB4-UHL~6 z`^65P4?;Vp;MXv?>x~^<;JO~}B!8Xp=Lq%I4&q|{z;EvHOP>c)0&Zh)k2LzN@SIfq zQQzKc3~mHmP2nUjt~PdLaBj48Gbw;WNP?bYV2KQ@FR|P3^~8> z;8m`W8L7$hvgFdItE975XW;bh8`}x z4``<9q0)Xleqa1S|E+;zoTOUpC603WKC$o<+TQd&pepJuKRchz_l_;Yk9ke~`WgI) zqkeopIWhds8GDx*{D_PB;e4E(;m16oe&zp;b^tl_A93Wz{WA^V1-GAn$2@{PzoHx9 zE6?}ad3YV2mA3$W3HxfO7xiX4Vt=$YdM%9{+EMt)w7v4atF?anrrW*5H)q!6ie7TPoN>J#xGr+%=iK`* z<`4U0{>@VOiyvtRORf*%dLix$fIhh~^k1Ts>vEsteT4CjJ}k07_rUBMPOa-H0q2hs z((8ok893_AvJ=Fm*DDU7{}6cEVf+6sa5ICWJjS&J+*;uz9_!!n?=$pI;pftMAo$j$ zE`G;+XGz*=`BkUiFNTm~`&GN&i+YU%dPyE`YECcv{@?m*2YP$1G53$!_p-&GPy1mn z@AsYGveswN?;X(Fb*BZ42bzy|<3{590eRxb?Z2FUe_Dag`f-qPf7%4(h+T~bIX`CE z#k{Kjg7b@AcT&Z^6T9xD1-x$Gk-T%`5Bd4WJf|GSeF}POU*FIZzX;3AZGOc0dyVhu zio8gVT=hrY^(M{R&R~DKr&M+Rvu!{A=^92b}RwzQFgO z4W}RErPenuL4WMJoQ=_|0y%bFPVs-H^Iz;(aUJ=Q`rNdb{raVmQzG8ST0cy!J!%@6`J7-6LIpSi<)c8`w`D z+D|I|0>9hm@9$5~r|5H6Bxdpxf3qF1Ed7$RtBR61j?)>R3G`|yocMW(b0k){JHT)+-d-tb{!w{VWRkoUeSO1A4{&|ga708X&XbwaXiZ&*Gt}=*sc9h zo+tK%{K0dfv*Oo2K;MPjtoV%;y~NL+ODFb*^y2zKuD_#S80Veh8=~iWz^pje-jn!6 z^eUS3^0M^eJeXM@o9}<6>pzEzZ%D6M#(F~L$AN$n|{m3-hG>zQo=TJ=Yax zA7ApGyVtYxy~^&{)%4wY|lH&ia*ys+VzZa{D19qySTnFGyaNR^y-^)nBd1aFA9%I z`eBJL^MPg8tQTcoER~#4Ud*u$vux;@7lrrxc2XY8zM*5k(J*wpudwVw?%L4Pzx@OB zy@B&b6{XF)`2qR`=t|$7_*L?r@^inQ*d0A*eZbk+Pvlntzoy~$W}|;EgCB7m*YkT%V~^k2+;{t<2)gb>tyQ&_eP`N1p0LpPU8KoM!&3h4;7unn{@Ph2mEIS_XeX!6}YX3 zJITM==u!GjXSa>_>kPjw`ky-RQZ4#@i^0u+>lhs6(w}4Ch6eY|hTj0VnZeoh;tk-| z9_}RnP2k7;F8o&5UgD@<0sN}K3mdWbZlm88_obG>z1-lY!1WF8Wd_#;ZlZ9KKQ94} zc4XzxQqhUNq+|Y6!GC9PFEV*&O*1*8^^3 za8EaWY6CYnxThLi8MuvyJIO!A*irnwa6dpC^;_dPvIe}c5kKE*2=^M)Z2W#!RS{8zufQp_CChQEdW@kfqAEj&gYJ9sGg5tr4UO+5Z*Q{Q3kJi|TzEe*~-Pca`0|3}9=y>5Gs z`Sq%YJIOx)`kq7CLcR4T#;|QukgDsn3LZ;gCB9^$Mx77 zk6(J-UnH5@{`kGu>Ypb55qh>K($_&h zQ1f^)AH?q@b`^b4f7Fi@E|L?kuVVZuZ|dXX_QU!T>Q@HGcENs#dguNuu}}1--4%6R z>}G#MIsE=q>395jHrm}$^dY;Os2?hvwww1S%A5GO%3nM|dhy$XO#7_jyo1T5i5x9|tmyaig#X~LgUq^rtreZ{V;r{XddQvy z>Pvr~=%eF6zcCI~9~XaThV=vRYZ=@F;Ro{LeYdZ0TJMRv9@4u3IZK7pdb9tbUK<}5 zuXAEOzq48Vpy!9EhjKsa&G^+6Zoj_cI@jOWbLQH>MK;7g$(L2e`B>D4?S2M&yB@-x zuf=|CnIX@vKN4jmKdrpVUpV`%ytY}tM0s`KwSB^uej|?Okgab@`is5aaE_V1-;4r$ zBfrJxbCSQNp8926c%I##}*q(?RX5ei9IRj4o%b)Zcyl<^l{b_OJcNDm;MtDiPWE{(XrTc+& ze5(KI^4R*x#-{^57H8u#%)nW{&oXe<@9PYl^?Tv3!|}F$uL4J(!(XxATdF?tUDLyiO*m(Ol>hcPJF6KuYiA2M+9;*Av#;t; zvy~?}54=(z_4(slsW!?L5)K$HntOjDHjT;nu^Y{ayOI#Qu=K>#9DacL8!b z3a9n9Z!NHkNL#7l)-PO@Y0`h+(dtsH)%h}d_$`L11|DK z{1dsvar{?++^*s){A|BF%HT&F`E4;ioEv`je!0ouM;!UJf7{(ZiXTbr7X9q_sD^rL zFLC780Kc~3$9npCkim~QmR0bZ`utMg*MgE-3Nd|U;1;VJy= z{kNIHk2vz=!PnZq`W$EXq3?2YUupeg ziJ!!-;^UoN_Pg92;IzM@`@y+-;Q37Y58BIooP*x(_b3~B;#UEA(Kz9J$IPc#In|Fl zd#s#w#(4yF;I&=ihib~T_X$7IpU=(qd!kj~w7sJLn2R6+hwop^tq&1IS@}ssX3{Ao-R1#?$wQ4MAt~t8Dfu zFptLpIg!lN{;!f00lBTlut`ex89&?^BEJKdE_@WrloyZ)>OIi~l&TXE{cF`Tr&HkNgqO!`tyu zP2r@y@cWB9#Ebg3fzy5w{PcdVy&SXeP}lIu?=E>|<2nRC8&~pUyPO2%>O3W`58M)^Yv<|rl{-~082QO~#>y@K zgY%2FSL71M`11bV03Q5O1gPc4jJH|lywpE_{GPicD-eduS(t0mFC!Ah(zxgJhS7@IoiT+wH z`v>Cc892^25Z3|D>SyOUh5?-9Gw1bZN}l8spP$z6)BRK0k8`X8qAgO2f2<#ipLTXz zJ*^*W893{oHgHz1_0J%KpY_i)fYbh2DS6sIEp@*L*_}0SZtbrAOV~fwo>m6V+S3o< zv^^8li~qzPJ|C@q(vNpaPt2>@I9fe({~ET(>RAckw4P1Wi=L6pRKL%8Y|h`)9`+YQ zMIUOnoUgX_SUr~q^xP>qAwBs%bE}?@_j!bVt@dw8zYx;1@_rYWLwfeW$Hyh>A=z)V zfg3Bi;&;w_FVyvrJ!RBy6;AHAl^dO&mr5X_ALSMP-M7#74^`CrdY_!LdDRNy((fZ? zh(}+^)%H!)^^ko%&@UBE+jogGFSc*v<5KSAUcbJRz&;-9ojJD%PIamjjF+Bd-XpqTsB{WwOL3O|mAh^wi33XX7j z+aI-o^Yu&4WoEz4_W}dOSNPd>HO=5h9QpCRz{=y7ypNzAb&jvjc=o2=M^sdOVsG-i z#D0SB51I-ucG&S%Pt|LF#E~E0AB+`V_}Ta_P;dQA9R0%g2V0+C>it3KUWq>v{nF1> zb>OUA%45m*2OY&%?4X^D$1sB*apcGM2Q!afGH*qGT+h4qaOvm#!b!;9J$GZ^RqEOJb(2SUik5Oi2Np~w|*v$e&O@$Qt^}LwEAbdc_YrNlJ73S zH|o#w^^d#fC%c}P{Q%`P&pN-^^Ud0zx96L6fY)}2ydmBf9C|LCgZ|j(!WHlm1M$Na z->JFH%7d}rN1KPx?t)dGEOtjDG4eB`-UUErzLkl)qBxmon@C_}Hpy)h4% zaXupRYYX~g{Z+^(?LhpsH0QRFZxuN0FTsy7PtNs^v}5qN^te#sUVEp@GoEuO{*e2w z&9fQgwT6j*Mc(uZ=Laiq8PHGUZE)VBmB;o#`zq(0AMEOW(%C|ZFcPdWApxwdBFJ)($7I}zZ2Wepr@Xs&)vt_rN0v!$&cSp=$5x*+ z7tyAkZ|fI1zqU{wv|r&w-|{p4cEWg#fYbVh`Ul?kYM=1)u!{SNJ)dqH;467J&&VUj zjqRgxKHNXpJfRjnN!ty%6Yk8r5h5Iw?x`uMbx`ugxuh>yH>($w>SU;EU8;)n$&@-M@;I$nh zZ~fKI?nCeI2cSRp{r#Bu$N=#d`vKa)dGLk8N!-WK-@d=!X6V1f`hykD`=`G+zNP(* z`#FD=u1nh6X?nGR7k;8w^S$oAKZYFg9RR2OD($5E!PDEx8g%x3`Vw+@e`NdJ2ITD9 ze_*|`&QH=e?jO#Vv7x73ZQ!+CB5!E)qrVwf%9~}#>l%8>TV}}X;5*Uuhm}YAO3~R@ zz9xyU#I0fIiLV2%?Gt<(=N#MdS=M-PaOC=t1?1WFBV2FJ=N#Vu*8%;+|Ff@i?e)<6 z^x9{_A4jeqX#&rD@8fyMzEAG~r~S6iL!4inwT^~sWKik=n((Ct*dw%JGe)5i_J?Vah{^EY?A@J0zZR8L?%h0R)3>VKs&#lGJadsX1 z+*$#idKGb=bH_ZlHi6Ur+V=-vd(ZN0@z~?q=L+(UUGK6rcJ%+&#nHCU(gV_Q7dt9f z-7`C?@RMyX_BnS9d3HXf33@x9G7IP@{YUvSr=Q<{q~~!fXWe|aj+4HRGtY{j>-^gM)N|(qbSs66^o`fka2!RuHwq{1c!KeaZCAz5 zOSk)wAKE|c>_4q%D@sp>IgEyeFF*Bk+7A-f`MXd5&cPgX*57?IUqLy`fSi5*YraDQny zJtA4h5XCBW-`wJRrd%g1JVejJ%H3beWoL(67kb8<+Qh<@bT{2Hgv%BPRl32oK&kU!?AFI}A29m$E? z;nhxD+Hp8{h@H;5B6&lbv>l_0&&QS<3`a(e9v=z!R{}U z_=!KShhFq2<5c-Ci9d9l>gu}a#k^qI?>x-x_Ur78QdS9Cn$A-d*-n_4L)%B3x1LSvB9H)w2{CNTLo7X1o zT=cprBaU02K5lP?FHG#xe235S`QB{!GENPjK8{mcT@Tq?Mg2hGbewL4JhrE?kIUKm z73^CW+zsGk+uK&*Bu>0CA$n6j%O%>=2=eL*uk|OMWy{B%xd6Rt4|jgvq2C@D z9NX(0_mdfLQ-fpw%lCpk;8qGJ_sMvE-@F&heUY;}vN`@me#uYp-P5dj3yvdNpttiD zWqdD?&sW5EGvwL*Z=#IkHT_8X1?cU##eV09{mMEZPy8{)ybs3##AnS<^Zopx=atT- z&Y#CVuk?WzdquBx#(u*Ia5_%nANzbhf0E0qL(iqF`=gy#lDyx`$9pV0o~i(+<;(L+ z{avR&zw|+8pI_|zR>pT2kRy7vpXkPI$Ier4F>l7_u&jJ4UFPh!&vCWuojlT0zbf$B z4-yAHCoqpX-{9_p_Wfw-n((-NkinPjo9$roB`$9E{l^&Zg;Vc8GWc@*8uNv|J*G;x`c?evd9K$Vsr?6n=lE6clMCs^_4VABC;pXwHs-73i9dMX zqCe)SuYH#{zKZX=D@7lY-)H@oB=(A5xE|i_Un%*xcz+=E>40C|;CSC+9&jCN$KbNo zrw$E{d{}bd+sxn?PvV$=YlV||@%xE|D?C5M=cLd+=AS;NQSz^$=t6$3qQ0wer{!N? z;k14ebzSzUF>fQ8`yc<7KSFwNABXw=Qk-vvFHP*%dCYwrS$z5ZL4B^2&f~V?8~N*^ z!ha_7mRinO;X?ZJTrhpElgKIHd(sO&lU2I=*M_&fiGO?+s)^TlDZz! zXA1hd!s+&Nxf2)5Yx%gGtsj72U*W_*)MuiuhxBQHeyMO;pUaFs8y}am^;PgIRulh- zA1}3hke4-sy97A4Keqd}!Cf#o-cJSwcd?OMc&+RArUu7-6O_yTVP$aKpFkY@hul?( zz2bj>xcT)&R^CKWz6qb zKTMwG{CLO@Bk-M~6hEHkhlRq4A2zkHAGTqA^PNBU=Y1hB?$4MXjfXpX?ekZ|(6gPj zfj9oi+w){8kKb2{o3_;r02Ma^gGbodDXR9uSI(HcciafkBhJ5xkIUKmHSAj&9OoIC7o2z9Dcrt)y2{0; z{K&)~A-(y%-mEya6}|YA?USaT@#dahzuU^_Xu3-_sR#!uJ-#mvP$p z^l_YuwbSiggRZ7 z`o6+x|33rr=--i#i@%e``X%g}8{E^u$NGPxaN_?a{9k-@;t$dLEa+J_&|bG_Z!^fP zDLQQj^<&xeac3CE0p3#%(Qgk7?gI4SJb4qisll;-l6EB z+*Gc+ag*IYQvr_cSk#j|p`9$bFUrn$b};Y9`9$LT0luO~4(sd2pLY4q{%3NzYd2bt z=(*#3PJNF;>&0bf?#$^}9>ZAG>~c1H9zzKF{Cn{AJhg7VFLqtylE#PyHq?uI;EnVg>8YTPTZ7;81Q+wr_RUmniE`c7IRs{;b<}e;2TybAWP( za)kW?3zRiHKNs(SJd|6M?XP#&cPKm0b$_o=);sR+DazjS+}}ma+Yg@a{vN)-mE$*| z9_u8FZ*hN5P?o;O{oO!0MOl8UyWT`O8M(i6Z*yfA{jv z&QMO@?XKtMt{kB(yvO}LMp=9>a5#Ut@`vv4As8>fOS+ml%0PBAC!%Ma(~ZImjBuPJw#dA zxxYs!bDws9cTx6ouAlt>q`e9JW7GLRp4o_68cT^iMw!?u{Zc|(f+EHidz4lNL#Ad- zIt;N@ijuL$+Mo!E)YjNzPf>zuL#tw`rmCdYpw(FWzt27I_vb$MeC}sH)8GHTUNg_< zSiu47~vuThZW6z&>DVB}4B5rlSV$uWVp;6$1x=*;NhR0!*xC z@ETxvb%PfHdw>nhFFnA>nntb!H~`FHo~r=H*D`WhzyV-xs-X`7>+2XiwXT6xz|b^< zcd&ja;yGd;Ftd^2*8!v7Fn9wnwz0u0fIYk~m&X0r5bMeOCPpr@y@7ea&tAL3e z4ZRIG1kB@ozua`g?*JBdHh5zf1ABm(T@Bs>jO}jl3Sc|~95B8IaKQMU29NJ$U<)v@ zx4~s`X~6LD2Co68PB3^KFnXfF%YZ|`>Pdzk{)vG_z&>F1WJ52M46Ff$e+nEha*DxA zfDORdsfL~bYyl1cbEg@8^mGHufUz@B4zLB7C>weWumhM{VCZ$g)R_iv0LIQTcJH+oc^e$lP9)mXk zV@-qC03-JrJOx-MywA`h_ZwIQtP_90(EEUyuEAS?<-Ztw2$+8re8A@029LaBU9){DHxnfSC^sUi{d=$bSrsO*ZTM3SfMS!CQdY#SC5s90KNX zjz|@-4VVl=A7JDw&<7Y@68ZoKfU%`e4zLfHUE0v2%NW=IjD8h*0EdA2h@n>j!^;}H z1{hh+;3>ccV0w8&?*SH9FnAp>^)-VR0DFMN6%D-)SX#;8(WrsRl?`kH##S+S88Ei0 z!7G46!2D{4UIiTDJ^suZhF$^;t!eNCU>xtaRRP0zPb>-80nFgNswQ9`FpKwt8h~NE zH;k56-`xNV^L`buMjZE>a$hR@Qsqs|x-+ln&aLMs zd@f4J{i$8H+ieFaE0_GPUtuXzzQ3Ev)8AJ9>VylH+iy$Zi=MB@AI?R%gh4~Q&OLJO z-p3VY9tB*0=!@)*d;^|-?E_zb>y4#;3I4;U!wL+~#Om;g)z<^bz}Ex<0|08o69c9ewP@Sa{ir2Uo9-r27IvCF@=m=fNw zDdn7aK3Pisa4teV7oLND%C;;rqOS@4UBGqMSmugr`v)v1eDR}>JhyH#c_qEQlEJej zk1qB(E)a&LfOE}0WcztDj+%L>!OZ_+-zno>*}Y7hH@)=MBadvcvpZZl{K;j|DfieV z)jW#$`db}x!b>>kZ+0Fwevv*r#o!mN()$B-QIE(sAWyj-^c}GK8_V!4ddj=wE!uHp zZ?ArY&VEk2Qby?P=Qh2(wDF5}DbN0I%d`L6^a}caV&K(>*yXrj%XhzF@t$+A7Sq!=F;w$K*MAvXP7Y zZ6|K2hBQA4{vii0Se3e@ek;E)g4ILqL#5My?i%}5JZEyIVvjI6_ z2|bH`YqvL!@48+@K85}M?79z+oNw#WagJd267Rcbp>saadL%!oCyoE4w}3x$|6*m< z6T=Ysm?dA>&*byo_^JB_)mH=UjQVSk|4!kaR8W1TEcp)PxBlpXJ?#3DxC)p*LRo)* z4{xJWch{;1d;(x!hivDQ#uN3BEwtMPnY-RLx(2hyxd}-UQu5IM){+Pr3 zZR_E8ymnk&=xIM}ez$>kIUn10I~d>WxFT35jiTdR9X*c8_)t5}_|LZT#=NGx78Lu^ z{~P<8dPyB`hyLdD-CKzwz(q1j$z* zPy4a&8-L!O{oCn*?GN$;_>qBpVcIck+3ipKXZz;3Rf7C3FHPMuXuOC)Kl@n&^5?&F z-^KQLA^Llm$LW6$@@u_cxu4GxCD(FEe@L%o@)0?}>kpzQd$m8m%=aT-xpMI)cw#+!GYcKY$gCbc8)%f_+(NCCEqW4)0DEC7}PYk*C_4qzWJg!w57m;g)z z<^YR;JrFv$V43v)1b4AK=GS;2|32>J>!t0XB}d86SV#k^t@I5%VxLk`|>wLkLa(Dp`T*` zA;*&K=FXI&?xpqjpr?4xx@-Mo-;dn;DbXL!dE;A9x%NS39)Ewcpa1w(4K~D*A*>AqS-MI&yxvz-0@dx-P z`l*kQdDw35ypaU>;)k9)>vx^^(oV;HM*ZO#!SOS`A?D@%PI!L#ZyfpQ%TmsbALZzG za@Mpb|M`=zj_Az==oPpcroCp(DeN+H&YT%)qe=T;g}x2GyY;d+{`0Z#)BkpW z9Vr)@VA?I~@7TY!Cj9r8>%1rB#1FQALblWI?LBYi%w1;`M2?rM?_iUs7~pTh=}*6P z&L7>4BjIO2Pk(Io*$#YX(7&M{zEX6EJ;q5$yW7r~J>$qjW*zAc7%(XM3eZ;peC1bf z-*V^cYYjz2+C>X=6mh}A^1FLs<~+B9TluA(A@ohUwLJH}WuLg1cH)POZXaTY{h5&M z-1Kkbm9B>z^z3@|YWa7M*>gvcSXe!5yYKgA9y06Dk+v-IqOS}+b--G6|Brur=f?x; zV}1#l=iTPcn=@nftmCyp(bt8ZA>gdyCRac4@Xqdbq4>xCMaX`ZnKyT&jfkH3p(amh zz#DEq?YJHH4u2|sNqrSS7o3;q=lfNJ+^5=h){%$KoR^t5^Uzs`%sAScbEK@B2aL;g z=-uj(2|F$O+$T>8U+ne9u(yl|I2R%3IgbDCJZD6FcA_&)d~05~-!b>z^M8L35wVj7 z9YtIq{&D zp4&OQPiWgZKV9g#|Bm51-(50wt=Jd8Lx+uS*V-@6chB$9fBVYKx4WF>k^$w!FOFw~ zY=6>D7B;RGps(`Iiw8}=;;CQLPA$NW_K)N4GMAn9_=Wo)H;v`GW0Yfk6fvG}ck;XU z&PlEMfRq!xk;6?ssP{Wlx4rf8J0`f}m*gt}zR2^ExH)bTvR<5)J9|F5uda_g^c+~q zT=Dr954*1ui~dT0e(e|A$zhu%zH`Xd7cLMVq+C0oocP6dLCF5Q`#h&xApp_OyoB;5 z{;Bh(r}kau#OWd;{5a^ef53rfOqg-p{%;9i?5DvOoY%tgvh8tRL)CdHLC;eEEWO%4 z^w3R3m*}qt=$CTrKk<9b`g8Sz7F;#+$>vX3t`|_w@$2Kw;Ur-m>!LPb9P5NOV4U+j zU>~rD`67*Rv%>KP{VfmJ0*s+uW&x?E1)SxncZ84fL&#B{a<={P%4N`A8h|Cn1$->M zdE~PV$hc_F_Md)HJ~Yd;ud&Keek^?~M>$i^&VDY|`BCT>`oh}Z!Ok$rX9UuY_M3OT>;6RLn;Pnr2Z?^hYkZd{|j8)=}N$RwQiqO&WQ`G)?qp|1-$ z(nVhT#kg9%cjNaz_33lMcVs`Izl7Z5IH)KR=JLfq+vM@C39Eg!Nv_*0J&e)06t;|adI5q<=DNy`S$&fxW`#( zKNxTEANz0h_6dJEP|C~mIo5;VjxVF~ot$Ih6TbM(-`yGUTk*y3A^eMi&i$>tlGF9T z_1bqonY6*?^FRO6*m2qq^f0cAj=$jUoeq2RcKX5nm=Ql7G|!ENFMc#&uLH<^o52`< za2`LR{KT=(Eph9;wjcC!os<8w>qGm#=#JM;{zB!8O#7qV<-4T%lGeZzx3W4AGvYw zlWn{7>x$p+{*C=h|GEu!C$L=-XMGcA-ib3G#ObHt(%#rE3G;JJ{)&KQz$#!JP|8bt zEUf15|4qer`w{RoVEAbxKU8u~KBvSLF8hGdg7G5-DE5RNf?UR;myzeZMUQ}9vgl>B z!>UE^pxzsbF7@43xQw4ew4Wa6><8i}FX?CHvrW9uU?BSX9fw@J_swy)J~jUj;P>8q z=-R2@+tuB^l>Oi2k4+v**!Lj3|KHc|VA~Y=DC9H0Fm|)RKRfE_FFBS5`Nwf`+lM|b zy#L^N?q`2`o@iQnsY9TSgY9Uu=C|Me#uF!eBz(~`(r)MZ;}JeDC!SH~=yYK>hH@e+ z^G*lfc{2xP$fY4iy2v|!k3Fv(CKBdy;ux7%YtZw>Huqlko4p1%iiE`32A$*L=W8wb z*ctm=dzJ7PYUenSFqgIyKFZ|dmxZq^c>nNg-F+6ZlK`FLUTX8hPTu{$A6G?#+y2l_ zGmztRT9|NwmVUOst*0-&hoj$j`Nn-~ z9Mt2l_{FwJXpc9dSjHEgBTrk2qfNeqFZMXTaeSeFStTdq3+1Go`@91DnvxTG7?@?Ec=Au=*=4p6>0-8`4B?quHUxwdzBn>nUFvCBBP&SE*r2$Ve0 zAHviLULIv#6m9z3R|Nb#Aj^q9X^;KyKIFcKL^|gS;Y+@`ZsYwV<7g_oP9CRFPRdEU z>ym$>=U>pc5b^ORj?5QaU!D8bEq^}$->1(s{y6Jy^w%`X@%~Quyrh0Oj&uFA)QR6& zY5#R{?tZvC?_m93fu6DQ&AKAYL%yN>c5*kWUbvnSpCr#ce0R@0hfebHB6;Teq=R)6 z^BhxhlE1|K2i*E%J?ZsJkRN4rUnPFn?W3&piyxdHxSpaPbtNbDO*x5A>bnj8K*@=} zY+v*@^b;>`@t1ie%%gl%$%$V@^dI`ed?l5f^!uE`#jh0fl@(q5;&{|WJysPz$geo- zUCD`G91rOi`*BCfiC;rM9*UjpITWmn|be>tA8{}$2ijlGGJ z!w;M1x-C3E`CH=VUot+Ye^1GjO#Y&$nt5f(+V|ez9PH$KBI#1b@p)7`tDwByPcxR? z8stQe_|N?n?rRmmZ!5VVdt4XT{jq(YHD3Qzw+nAv$Ra;U#G6!d($2HM^>`rkKKv?K z@^R3s7Ci)dL(!dlhS~~u$4}I24|KK*$rCSWXANtAIC7?$4>=y_a?;L*mOSM|r{tgg zi|wqDGv{HXPx105^{@A{gX*IKd3%4gKh5Z4yQ?X^x}CHAGM=`QbMsDI%@ab;gC056 z=Wi&kaLI2Jaw*Vto|s>UHs*7;*@tX%B)1%#{xWi(R)oISZaXVfIHh%}=yLdzYnGk* z-Lu_$BJig)@t$W3a+_S3dT4?>o4VzlgG@|6B!8u8AMQCJC8f=JsQa{e&d@{o&}kqmSH-SyV_MxO6sXCS}UnXwNhySx5g8Ii9; zK6Qa9SAzVblfSriit}()=Ub1vb~#V08J{^04lI9cIgW!}D^4xvJdYfCJ}_y|RjPDK z#=q>(O#YbfbNAWuYF4t_KQTTt?*+(f{Z5Rd&ROaq4`IkB04u7z^y}OzCU1Gf*+97_ zrr4M9BzC&j{>9$`?SZb#(`Q`|TqkosnKA;M{7g)COnc*gJN?egz29A@bpzs&{ual3OO)?yedQyx zE%~v3mz(W{^G@OnlfMk0l-2VS=L_DaC2&6_a-zQm|5%ReDXu@MzoGO?KIkuD)mmTH zUov?ozpu)>{$U>D`jY;I%U*jBJIpsB=gqohFR`gvC(vF->2b$v$VU)A?G=@rv={Ez zai8j~{=B7sf56`sFkktPOkB(t_gz}h!+iC|(98X#>*p*8KQ!@_9Yl}JcXqz)eHq?g zM;Dm<(ElWG_%|W0@)DH466Edu2s?ijrC0Ko#QnOxFVs|W(w_1K)83gM?we$=k1*1| z&h*za>y5ArdFE$;bB4%Is`BC=_d&Q{(th65Q&!2j^^5(^RYkFLRi>`8(o?Tj{~&+s z`X|5sy{$et@Q}NnG5kpr`5rs{;5tP3;ztekT7ZnVH-;apOF`#4`=4KY@rUh~J3#){ zevrTSQ(OOinJ=EZTlh|%C(w@IjxVG7WBx2JztXI0qqBBSKA z-)o7Z&Nch62@jSYx#4>GTl-D^oy%s9yX2;`-RC*tH`|xU3qE4k!6gokPlR3A@B93i zG^zV1|F}3*e779~Zvrx&*f}~c-oEMD;*fLw_s#=f{lo4LyeWU{c*wtJiCd3ekh$iE z;7{(q?Du2ab=F!#cydX5NxtIe+w1Q<{3!$00o!BvxsFjCTJWv2Z@ur>zuj!?c;hYk zzu9|-2lhPf1$X#$^RDtEIPFULpuA_!HF?Sb8avMOX)Esq#h1KCfF}T%_o|Z9?P!`P zcCO{0e7t<^BkQ~ETj!npovX2{d+Yz^eUTOaIgS#iUBQFmiJfQSNdStR)Q>%0rxf4q z7xWu+#*tH;{tP^`lj8O-HVH+I>c&?UFzBiGy!?@rH@+zQ5#=cBHK2&H3kEg!zi@ zFQezzqT-9+ao}k{=BujYbiOu%y;Gk5PI<=nui9Tw?Kk<;7fVjRVui1{k8Q;79_z)C z7o2vbyu`urgD`eJ>K{<#0_$J#-TJ5BpfjGllGE{QEQ+0L+0zc0e)&_2yLr~}kpIby zpC=!=^F+5jiytl2Kl5&n6AjqwSbhw~@Z+1tjnK|7e*DtOsSf5{Z=4{1`Q`54@Y2)5 zkBYdPSH=sRc7-35*Wv{xuVp}y3(9L%@g=WG;8{TCwWZ{AUN;fN&UJNlqxH93kljN5 z)_Em=)>3q2_E;<%Z zJ9hptTm5NT;gDVA}n5n`Ue!b!1`BwxBh`= z0U1wA$?1693U_o5e!l%-SM{f!ZR~jMnf&smOXudjvD80=@5ZC_1^J)8*!Vx*Iz9_I z(JTIkfyV*qe@V${|GzB-o$JttpZMmNo9=yq{H^PQ{1X=}$bapsb=~hSr2XpOl@hyc z=hiTXS?Y*my6u#t*b_AEa zIse>?u;jBhX_9?kQBi#HI|V!k$oqV)W;hqr0>Xy zxWrq6z8WCw$=a76d9Qdo*jaJ-$cGc@oOT7D z5YS)aRTFm-P~@b)#;x}b(~2+g^btoGbhh_`lGF9)-pDw**Ntrd+~#Mm=k6Hlc*tL7 ztCd&X^wu}rX;J)VI}yJGr(MB=;u*qz_)^{eN8cYr6<^|MqFmRCC#B?cJUfa5&h^xr zYb5tx?ZBS=t>Yno;z6^s+h6jHp9x?5ryaqA{BOhFc5+7*6KJZ0Fg`urHZ&aNxI z#FGY|2V^`QC8z6SXK}!}R$p`FAAWeys~^hWIv(uGcNn!B>7wWPyW-d-+bdUx1W2w z@Wp@H5j@EM=r4@_qe<*Z}e?3-({w5&TW8E?A?qSS^F1lljOV)ULSNC39+a-UO+-K#}zqgqC zx|8IMcBHuE&H3kEgqbUJzZtzA%PGF(D*`+L$oeiRIi0V)U~f3#)2a6zyXi-QYQM=( zO*#CAga5X^+kC}u){DpsPP>9j99)MHhOabnL;*!EXgwBJe2J$Gzx!4^86~IV*+&#R z*XM7&@#uec+}Hh@M8`w^>+OB#pFZ`;k@1jrq->D?UDz9MJ=Rx#iT_pLO+eO1=gmIzNn7j z$Nol5=r_~rKRkBsW~0_Qk9%)h@gDc>aPfb{jw2uBKllB5 zKD(pm^?~Ax|25z(K>8oOI=CJDKpb|iPp@9`<>B@9q5Q4=C;x)2rv3JiO;375_~Jk9 z2p;5r4fe*H*Bi<&@jnN=M2PPcx=K#x-(4s=J}k5DZPUWfZ@9Mjqx~m;-Sqm`&;2;| zQ{jvM>@UP=SMZ>Ca@Uyr6#zvpXj~~NzQhv)o&scj)Rml$XND+tt|L$0VApSLy3!N! zw~mMW#a7rp{n^a(8p4-&Xh-k~0pnugTI2tC^Lh$$qDTB6z|RQi^gplUwEu1gaLQgf z=hV5=w)pBbqDT8r{%vpGe$7KKZu+S3#edonJjnk6?2R|Chkog`bMe1{avjV6xRTTU z&lCro>(|pZU;n=KZaiK7*8Y>f;{zw9s~acX{VT`+P`v1$*9*{J0pz^i7{l)2V#v9k z-75dzm;d$Lee$=qOa2ynF7w!xGaq$tTP1I_Bl40r=bw8K#;^18A??+E4w6)S$yXo# zg+XV1XO*1J*DTm;F6jL5vRT`HA*lA7{L*sApPyU0yOi+7Z`KQO+7(>l;CxQlgZ+We zkJ0PW(Dh!t5>E~CEkMQ-S8_U@Bg6scIk;;9S`}3zIxrU6Sv;eot`8f z+7bC6{~NG3-n`yYeu@7D;1xjn-&bk9Gu?{IS0f#(!nvw%0+WUCjG7%ySZQqQ@Nv;Aa?gw!55?(|MdP1)b|#8~tbV zRd4=$1NmF$k^DKIulaO8y5skRFaEQ>i1$@~g5v4J{?O;g=yg%}Mz6lzb^-Y|Amd3W zIUUcj;*fJ)F!RmdKr&UgO%!GTXbC9-Zj%C8{*o3Jpyagw$B9GEwe5m^fA`$4w;r{hM*f+vT=e2wE47{$S@ECa4RP8PJSd*xO(xG} zK#>bt7gZHs;z+UY?5R<>PUGjgu zS90YmzrMsB!k2od9l<9A%qyu|z40MvU6fIL$yW$?43PC*P;xq7r;1_c8XS7TE)Oqt z_rdbF_M80j9*_3_dhl{r2w(hWy%48e!6gok>x4tt5C7U9kNsRfs`wI56Xm*AJSioo z<8e1I93LiMu>1V)pYxY>#UC9H`Kui`IvoaIW^zx7~Qt2H(xf-`aoj8#ivHsh7{mAGd3VBfi1s|6hP^x> z*Gc6u{8%80o$KDucK+^m|NZ&O^0)Sb{5?`9K7HHFm;WSu$s_FuE_rnRxffyNHXZlq z_q1Y)FZt`hzX2foVM@vA`acWy&Rftu?x(YFxmQr_H~G_!`S(As_}+r3@WpT15j@E6 zw$I+^`;)HXyY&vd4#;{RDmm@|5Lzofb_qq1nh=i-2KEpg#>cVE8B#c#>q+JEx5Ie5Fx?)bkwb`-vo|4{5C|2iac zx5-a}@C<`zfRE@s!q6`jf^%K?lhv<@?KJgF`CHp1|LI-NTyD>w-2RI2rQT^raLJqV z&%FrSK6?S3m%ddrQ23?nwuH_nMyws{JN^o5P+xsC2`F?rpmG z&3X}e!D&};iG$-HVd)-|rwX9R1>FbK6kp;=0nY(4p0<+H@wf{mM|Z#RQ1$hFR=?iZ z@y2uVGb?P6p0;J=E5aB5X-DuN|1(YF|9I<=9OOig_#XkD0HptAC8zzrN(wsHF6-_2 zx2A@{&fGl%g#K`z0Gv|5B06~+kyT8AlDs{drcf8deMHb7J^)}Gk^S| z`AA&;)ON{FetXVA$wRLCv+yNvv?KV0fc9JV*&Dq-Q&oJ)R~mR8knh1Xm7LDkwPM)0 zF8}KayPkI7oWtaA?Kk<8KKkgmC$9boOm<*)6tH+tRHReZPq1Fr*e-8NKm z+HcoU$M)PSPW#dP<%=7LAKGv7&p7^1rz2vfqB?%B5BnzWB}dMLebSOB@`p2$K(( zIMRSpPR1>J9hX&niDwACQP3GrNy+JWZW6`Lwan%d&O37L`xckKbv)#+J7MSPCm(#+ zGQyX5Xh-lM|HBU&|HoU$MIk48#Q!$@>|6e)l$`ee7Afdl=l<)5UtU$&@)`MC`%nJ$ zM{W|i|KWste<=P()Ho$Nx}llKGxj3W(h-^cMlyAFE^7z0I{03cY{o zRcGw_!Z-F5RNEzg@qO3d?VSy_L_2Z5m$$y}v(J0zz}^6m<5}e4;P~B*636xzPd7I{ zVD)8-wjbor-2Cmg{_@!;UlYF6AMFS(_2>L^FT$$N-st(DuJ~^LfENKdAGDR6Zijcl z-qWkEef_eJt>NBh>im&^;cn-|USIWaJii$|KH2$;v`n57fNVb*;9^$$aS!|`Z8-O_ z*B<)6>10q{bJa;vcG(C@%R&;rsZ$l9>|aVW&8K*le3=+U;Ji%h|{j%5(o27 zn0v(JtpF%;LG@5le2FIpJO#*j>Pk+>^Pnhpt_2gn`QPQXdEC97(eaS~ncgZHwN;eL&Bm$3P!i^g7lTk;nac=;Qt| zZqcKlr!0C7_s?02-sk>=MUR7Cw&;26!_+K#75hs~i{8b)U&o?HLGN4i9QP%k@W)%n zK5o>a$GE?1(R0{eOI!2`o(JSCdKb@UiWWTwdc~sG@LZ{G(R+Bl*Rtpl(7P5rgXfzA zi(bNW)^OXOhZde6$1Hjh^rS^E-C)XREP5F9yhTr6Z{$lBy?C9WS1o$$mxkW3=xNZ~ z7QK9}k?&db_BDn+wCKaD4L$OtfgG=rpvNtGv1a5_7QK0up=T|60`!7KFI;Kl%ND(M zg`w9hdjA)O-n8fi&^s2rak-K2TlB$Yh8}tf5aV+U^r%J8U25bK7QIq6^t459{oK%V z7Cj4k(V}-QG4d6Q9tFK_(Q6kQ`IbfRU1aE8iyi@eV9~P|8u{?k2D09J7Z^Nd(IcQI zEqeKUBcHM8&5EJtEqVy_l0`3{XXL9Ey?L&oH!OPp97Atg^c3hli(WX}$PX=g^DIM; z{LVn;Aq0Bdq8HCJaw&@*0X=Kcy9#_$<$4)my^JL{NGLg8{wO$c&n(4Do_sLNTuO=&!6zQ^WyNe4ea;n$Rv^NtEP zoA-zK`;jH+Tj&3N`v%v{R4nqLqF=rS`F)?gr0IC&yMoT;p&c!#&)o^lGx-RT3tT_` z-pI!RMX#K@lb+~*FRBASGmv8rL_SC_&;QEL_3B5~)fG!`UD=g&seK*~^Vv~yvM!~Z z*q8O*0Q~45JbO~_afM5sijYfzuHz70a!LFp{Jtyse1D(cW0NlO5?5nMf4(Rue2I(u zt~_6j`s&I*N6$q5?lkqY9QE*gC7zQu!0#;&#?ZqyW$R)7c7L_fmM`r?_y z-zjE(?Rw(*o9Vfx9N$;WC_NGn>EfTnLw$r*B`^N-+;ER&rv8 z^+`xOb(H6MM9dq{*+rbRD+-m&O$(EAp>#`gawFCOtH3wqR|M?gM7q zCDFKo=BtkS-EYcCy>f0OY(TGl{+oSnCC{bo2KeFV{ls}Q!@UUEPY(J~f#yTbyzV@Z zGFRex6aW6(e>HjY$A5CSdu87y3%a}U?1;91x6SGC@V4&0jl{|ElfM(e{n`;D&L0vd z?GRR>SLDPFe~)5K6x`?4U%fkR)(P(Rt*jS%kf(m`Gad2DaraXvipqXbs5QgCFVFGW zK7TIpXRqBzf3?4du+J~%_{wpSe&m%N$DdL4YWGtU_vq(J4W-8&myR_4aXh5Gt|iBD zljp?+otqTo*I47FeXddZ1usu}yo_SqOTP+AF329oM~+|2L)bb;sj2knagyT`?e&zL zQ}0tao{C->2SQ!rcN~!P3d$uddJOc8MIR#Hd5c~Ky=2i-pjQ=Le&-{3tnsIa_S|AW zfP6#A>;AWrIPP4_u7BKnYaRNq+nsg4S=q2d)BhB{_?LHn;6A^R{>gLlqAwb|>^~59 zfz*@pkAJ%`33)-Zot<57C{&yJvt!nI_{_HjmHt_>^s|1(>Yu4Y{QZ;Xpz(Y=J~!(q zKZ5+^dw1eTQ2!0T4dZgWsoJ)7MDNlP< zOOEHh@qD&L?Y}(N&OQ&$?!V!e{duUupYl0=zYw(-)VSI8pQkradfaguc6e?Y?<1ps z@$w`6o4+@)fh69!&R+8JrT?+sA?|qsGLG;(u^h^AAHYbP|HW_TpL-FOlpV=O^F=Ek z75H(!KOb#XE=X_j0`33k=gOg1J-(X<=9E>TsAUpc~MW-E2;`p6c<)nS3fR`U;TOExm-N| zi|uiMb%)rKan(N0XuR{dnBS7J7nt9RJb!e4+p3)8w+6g#(X+&Ro*v0>_hFOYB=}Lq z7e6?z6Lyftgp!kXQ^CF$$8DYum{D?0yPjNBxcHl7y<7A)`e#GY-S)7R**D>Rcw6zs zk0kQM^TAk8fcFc36 zByMTPoF^)(oV1HP@Pz1B zD*AU5=c49633<^edEvQJJnxG6*W*M`Uc#4p`3=f{-Lk{;p}MFy=D)4vg6y=F9i9Kk z>z;kde;;}h7QF;|TG1u{97l5C=M-Q3;P^o}MEw+%oaE0QN7%orN>0X+mcqr~0_weQ z(L5AwH%aVDJmBn(|E(&N3cC=;h=UBdBe+x>~Ghn`S+_k(3gaqwl8_% zzVpKNuch9~v~!|oPvUKm?l>xOWP!H>>@gO(zbY5DcAnbjA4hOckMg=-@b@cNjxqvup81?CNKX0>eIkti)5Mnn6n*Y&g(#}}F^UM8V_RG{eUY?|0_ z+@h|x>OMQpb5yMR=x;epD}j3N{_@j1g`gaWj#dw zP4HvydG+bo9MwNEkV`5#-}>ztQ=ZQOvPw?YLnVcaUpck|iyj5NY0(>Kw;e^7bwgj_ zlK&jr_xr{l=FilY`9CN=j^Fn4rRwVb{+x`ObyYGzzqAkjJ|Le99dY#2PyG8|Yq_6& zh=1(=6_jVcwEd&sgbm1xoY>*>rzKEu!WyT9*ZIGQ`~8LR`P^tp@ZURX{Y!Q|Ahn^O zZabZ0@)I2x$omP1yFl_p`-Dlzi-5MX77AYa{^wu);SZLm3F_{DTl%?f9&7(Qw~BxN zo9!t**Z4WI|E>IR$Gam9-+msXf8WSmr$P^(2hpDa_P@k$85iwyAr|#HPxb@j2ld#$ z17m+r!G6r=H;k{Q^f1!COc4?Tay4(D>hBA(0ecQF{3 zou7=-Blh@wg})C(dqpJ|WUq|+;d2Grv!5rllpe8XKPRERz9nZr=UCL|34ESnKj*NY zCuBeJ^69p>vw)v%ApI&Sxu87o`Gr02+s_l)N{`sHpO?_yK*>4d<`l|Fe%<--U&g;A zAn7%fOI!2==sAlX2EAy}tEh*HMUR7Cx9Baj-7<~RS#CV&7Tn#X(k|o=;wGo-u@%M#~4+=)^m%xWsm!3BhQO4?{<`& zjLUp(F-%biNDIed`41+oNx5-`3&=`_ZNfmtDnP&9zGYzUSRYwzu}>m zkD&bWcRM6To!^WqC;5#7FIe;*;wdY-mHtBX1m(2_`S7P+e#9Qv zmz%?h*5*$=+TAJaE(`R!Zwv6}yt4e6t6VUxBB=Po=Q2g;WqX6T3xe8P)$)Vu*cmAJ z_P2kw{!fX+z5%pX>1VM`$nhxj#O89Xskd z=g*BipMx-ud8H>PkIAavj-AJbDld8D^An((iF zsiD(eO34M;<8zns>Z7dmh`loG*uQVlP;%1V?E28pg+&j4zan|L@tgHARCQQOFMgnV+1J3(60F_apiXPoLPc>!YspNL*dm;qO4uUPs9V*-N8;^LGyz zpM75u{jcYb*yHa(*uUS9vgG)C3;bP#MZK@cTw&}*uk`Fn9_;&yhGmbxk6{0fL08EI z<)I5Zqt>0)dxo*lZ{6QfmOQz6Kso+i0rQ?#a&ljx&x@CNHV=M9$q9W3KWi4f40_X| z=RogR^a1L^nz7Gy$9VTG{GEkS?Z>)r$xZa~ zF82642qV9@fcuuRlGFDsKahs!TqnjRUYFl+{XOJwSy%A)2RbOXsO##1vLpWRcL4Z% z1B_qaw@CkS{<#-n;#z+{weM?kll*b>y#5HvaUE1razS}7^3U`5dG0^+ zKi+-Kc<1mlzddCyFu&J%^{De3pW@|9@*4u4w&+dh&ndd(m-jVQ@QaEsesEunFaf!W zl9T+{_ciQ44J9Y{HC=^^zje0r#r$z3L67+96T_g#6-^$M^1QW}%(z zcf?n}c(1dpd(NEnQ=ao*L^;+k#9g58YmNZplJ+-mf8f^j9urjb@SN?|IC}C+n&(*V z11G2K^M77r$48&s%{|vf^zi)r@Zu&ft(#1IFzW)TA3mETtio;&Fplz4K;I|14}cun z{hu$`;m%9T?(uZ`KIzA<1*gm^gH=8_>Cqbm6~B0{dkuQoej)CHp!VCc{NQ~O&--eg z`S082{OG1_M1kBVg~KLp>gW7D)_qcVZU21|&(G&M_gqhAp;zn#`5FI}*Uw~KW3TTk zs=Ty&o@;NPKi{zA>d-stoOkS(&>!|QLY{};ywUHMz3z-H;q@Q!i|4!B=dh=hTu}Ut z>-~1@b$dmX7dt$MJ$|z($2>QbT#%hK~aN9^%jbNd|fp^^*AWAP?`Ty}k>mh|!? zc6jbM&j)9H<&<2I9s3+|yI<5*d9lOu!R>Rr+e$7df2mtdJndimp^U8SZ*8UC1!)^XNbXGC*fD?;* zMVGen0D1cy>XecT$^*|CFWv69XXm}F^hh3f9(C*vQ;vCPD7heeeT;`Gl#^g&9I)?i zhf0szej#t4>l|Cgp9h}H%=42M_5L<;r-`EjNWbj++lpn6=P29f9XFL+P#!9G8GEDd zPptdf&{zHO@f=^CbIiQQm7Lt)QcmKK^;R1Ef|3(@7k-v3dLHzuMNfg=u;?AsSKFfJ zK<`=f0s70(qPIbhM7+4g&n)P1i{8h$lCtO}(6bgj3VOk!*D>CfEqW64nnmwmo@!e3 zJm?*ZKE%49Z_ztkFD&biHxGJL(cSNt?nZyZx~dNthkQcGOTXbc&pcmxQO6;k`#h?B zTKCU2%O1~V9y$LR_s?x5r|+M6zVkBw{r(YaZ}7Y{S9iV1b4DY}nY=9O{aXU^MvwEm z2u+i(0U+Za@BW$R$ci4P{Y~Pz-!-M*?LYS#{Vj`L1m0D2xnJS)x-94eAK$yLy;cl6 z*KgO~aIMupPVXRp%Q~Fr5674P-|~`%ywT&di~Ee213&#UtrTEX8By3iA|=oQeDiZ1!(eQg2!jN%84!(qtfm7Me&`@WX#x~$~nzP6!o zX%Bt0^R7iNg5LMjC#KmizUIX(ailgf^L+;WJF55+2k-j`OL#t(#rM^vQKQHYE?{)X%nIBzF>M>@?Q%>r^?RQ6*dg1pOxsS~KeK@-CeDK^Ip4TM$ z#9n`zDbI6bGD=TSyP^L@B`5V(C9c|y(Bq)D$am~I`3-dyF8S;tj|0$kUc^_qB%l3d z{rL<(ZE)sEmkY{Q=Vc?`nC-Q1k+a(;&;1$9@ym_%K6VlBEsCF_kMBEnKo6Qf9A8JB zd&BzSx`O9wl;;{hcn*%(k@_pF=Fi7)Wv?BG9}U<~qdfDKT*Z@Iq9AFDDfpRrfUh?0XWb`xdY{xAn=fpKRw1z*NaT8;Y{8r+=h0aU)@A>69-il7~pZ>D_w~jISuPOf=|0nAHD0$<2P1uJ# z$3fBW_sh6?EoL{NxoB z7r#rgze~t&;m>RCJW~&y0R65%=NrD*^7UKvBko(qWB$04!2j3tdU8sS*biUmw{O3% zP5X6KPV(CXo_)pZ$L{_5xdtEWypf*LBmJ{9 zLVDh}%Z&&*e~29CY1EBi0dft@w z-BNOr|1|I}Anl4CUb6qi?@qS{@xdpSY2|Bw{XkI7-v<0AzV(BTp8nC#*A`UTXJQ=_ zZ=q!RNAgq?=fyAnEXp$jQPh=>Kt8&Uxj)MQzwhW@EzY{2ytdE%g-gCTe$!)bxpL&a zan6SgOD}Z@)Ou*+wdl6{uk+B8D+ph=*P#`U@Oe2o95s)2Xm?$c2a%Qb(Y~+c&ht(g z_bNdy1v%1%8Kk#@eDeN8)l(!t@>ps6HO)6tu&b%`|(WUzz@85>_u70TWIQ?v*jz@6Hi5~HXZJsa{ zH~Gr|^8T`p`$Q=x^*Y?h><^S+HwSs)i+^#*^LxE0`dL-UiJmOh>tn`=`s4R}^uMR{ z{4a6vd$+OTh_C0hABltC@9{fa#*tHUVxRsKvOmxc+bQ=`>Z-ih;rDylWBub&TgizX zjw^(;!|w&{@A&LF*)7iw?%Ars43IogCfB%ZGzI&j&nQ z#{WF#l?>>P5AH=Mh^!lWZ)o>Z`*~7doF8*2$NOOMpO?hp{BtkDlCl#t-_alY+>$oR z6^=9Wq9~Pdlh42F;18639mlH1jnMhS)8GB;v*+$EsKmi}FaCcf{zZ)=4SCTcak8EW z?fNRCp13ZMa#L&l2F;VqPg}|9IC)=$J!rN|eJ+r+%Mm%pzQh&T%*2%h6u%@czV|VJ zowVXhd*R$cScY6q$%$Vh?|tCCCANo>l5_l;TvxdGRY$#b6kYq30KcdBL4LK-FNR7k z$SR=|+{r7t_NxGXQSpQP3PY}<2PNDO}qfV7*pX{2;qc z#SgN}^?g^#iQS0d@*@4Nk9BkcbjFFWUEr>Vo;A;LJJ$Jk%bkDy_H6qsA}pyHSNit^T`{uy@_ z{OFb@Po#@|8J`O$n0+1ISDf+QC7`?a^=EfAptiW`FSRO+OO8*yH_2{M#n(@%-lf z#7f^e{?aYJvA|ou<9?z5J&Wph8uArDWB(2c?>o4U#(vmSdZfSD>u<{G z`A)`(_;*bF_IYt!U-G=T4CI(!u9Lqe1m~K!&Q-7Nw$8T>lfT{kV&AHaa*H~@)qQqG zpI4YEd+T6{lk0KrSB=E!)8oy@D~p59_1;DM_dh)O`rG7h@t6Bg$?uwcEULd*$QwP* zcdus}|G1wt;?Fyt-_AHSg>q6(>Y)ZbZKY4fP1ZvR^sbNZ#kIO9a;}RPJoASM!-J2I zza=itZ;`G3x406JH+sBtrb5>GSFbZ9jv~tGbEWh=nFYV5^gCnDsPSunIGajN>f2sd zu>QMBPUeBo)+S!@U;K(dUtH0(UmdiUq~Ztpm4{qL$p!hvep*m+;#XDS;#UazT8i%a zh4*}#=+_;^7r&f;?nT&FeDNnT)r=!-f1IboDK9VLPh8>JZU}ZWiXUV*r}#m3InR}p zoY<}T@ladg(r!~6*Fk5T2-^iR@3z)6^UDA0dC-w~b0`Ak9nsRRBscVXv2 zXCPmIeD+sQAG0XuL9?8W)9uGt2k<#F{judZk1{WddLDEKehvY79&~J5uf53nA+e9i z1D_k$AfJYut|#%k1p0XAK{GDS!_4!dp1a+JouG5KrQLFWf^e+!ukCnSyZPe{Z)ft6 z1hnHVfWEMJB`@q3?O&r^1?Ywu3dtK>va z1nragu=geH_xsq7V%vLu%eb5ZuHRFT@i8&~0pI&?c~wsAcT)bm+4eavq_HnX`!%IU z?6-j1=N0$A`;gCmUzH2WcZvKRy!a%aMbsDVGrut^2Qz$2S6o0~L6K4WY=;Dvv zu2PC0l>avDWR+Y{yJEhJO3t1C6)t|Ips#JwJE*^|q6hgqQ2Zc&8_*Np$*boee|bL} zS90QSM&WL~q8}73dJ6QiqC4e7HHFLgAAwvGbjRmWm#l9hx0-zg{$4WIa|e8~+5;R@ zSy1E$xA^4;(7)9V_pG%j`w+B4odWgxgTIpyBo~zT%yg6QBB1D#d8@vhzkSERuL0_O zh<(-z_ZisUMISGBzv4vyK11^U4S#>bbvKXP=W%@$+u8WV?>DGJU{D-G_?1FAkrTf- zZgL-CJioY)kh^@T=kf>ac@Fh(UTXf2epMjfRes6%(fhtXzl*w$5Z}e?AEGB_eJ{VL z_umDjNBT2{%{EV zjN*%5Y@dXA#TS3#lT7~EUwQvkR&wG`UE$hp9`)H#{2;qM#SgN}b!KQcFK)3L^W&kk z!lhle(cZJ5Gfru*yrdsjzv*vh&6Umiq;j&^@6hF>J@Nch((T{NV4nCMDc@IXDgPu7 z9Qz1I)&tgaVV-M5d*R)^JV?Gc9(3?s3+*M8ocLW2`{Nw79>98q>rf-COLNVh3{ACe@p3e{fAwCuR{L^N>22ItlvGi{bzsSx|IGWGhV(H#ee%bFTcN~ z|0Si*_1{|m(f@{$6aQ zA>XT{9s7O2rYbLXxQ^p`kMEOqm0VDKw8QrR$9pd?wx>Tn?u%ydULNgcl-$DX7O_4Z z^hMFw~lcjkN51DXTEPnyOF*8@p8YE`?s{4QgREk zTZUbp=RcO+veGB<@;!w#{H5Kdl3SSFJnY)Pe{9Da+S?!R$omS|*QMQrl9PEd16;qy zAoMQ$D_Zh7&?^?bkNT@y^aAKDi#|mA?ppK;=mU!$1wFiv7pM5y!8j1J=vmN{7Ci!b z#-dj-uI4Rz2K16ekK;Y~szvW%K5Hnt+$XdZF7t2&ay`(UHZbaP<&H4(EuSX_t!qV& z^DEc!yx-PJrJZqJC5-NC@|gk@d71y48~VrP;Y73ll!u)5*BQq{sl|-^$o!+euakbj zbw1}~`lt7&g8XCq=lfyepUfMb_s#pi^dr2V*Dk~!=YP)Iw3kqFZush#`H(#Ea_=AU zJr(z1`MuVL2kg4a8$ z^2zUF2)Vz@@1X{;GuHP|pFz2rVjA>Q&2vu&zkXfynL3Go}hfv|Avy2ymg3M`OJYnB;Scc z@)l}y!=Rh6U43jHlQy{z7v<^x1eyzZw_*0&~=_97jnt|6wjNO zfd^63_Wft{@;5(!*yjHj{AY%@oICZN%YJ6_j{^UN=XN{)$l23p3SY+K&<{;qgUd}j z=Xc4+yghdU`@YD^CGtJ^OSu@zZ?pUHEASrGNE`WUQcl`?>m}XA}?{1PssI<-CykU zD5E*AA4q@UK4cpA6RfY4B^L+(e|>IKrrrhK`!GS{a>KI6=R~}}r(azq7nFxO?D0NS z@+J1{Jj7=B^T7QCKHs6ew2~8hY-fbbH}?_j{T#c!Rg^x-Klc-OpHI6jB`4!m54e7= zB=kJ!;e)++gg!)`Vivs&deWljK+h<;w13`D4$%JciXW8!668usPU7VET8xkVyQbuv zadvXskB0^dm;RPvKRCqSUmagYE_Yq~-v7V%M3T@y-g_eK?|I1obJz91yRi2}vYQ#d zs*qoMi8Bsgl=nnfZX`(O56K7DXIwASA6t&&)Bt%|)b~V&@H2L($v58y>R_O$a&CyE@1D=)RZ1Q4|4vcy|$7QzwP~} zv3{49^C|U2W-Z)re#bUyzx*@Pf4P60ReHp4d%rw~aiFB+WInC|*WdLCJpp>#lJ6t# zo<%Q$KD6iw&?7(c;&k#A%ESK%_;JM#s=qqhpOTX}YsZ=Kjq!2am{W2xf0q?5@s*&j zq3GJL6!t?iL(s3DCmrXF`77> z{mYw;U)(R_^ZGk4`^9A(!&t_>zb^XaGtmF&nxFrUb0Fn|@=ZIG5h!wO4}-VNeNm8{ z6T_(SwE_EG6~EL^IOflHiToo+w-2eG>YjdiyMDM{;5^Ry$wHsR5u~U4ws)T={ebHM zd%wM=^hiCofH&Xs$_u>+dSA)A^*`5N|8el6ppRAmTqk#M&N279Z~5pyGbhI+D({l| zxA(g<(Ers5{nr<^-`(BToEKGs{1czdnHaR+&Gkkd`|vF1dEsBb+5T%eX)j#I5cXi7 z`{Ln($=g`_;sv~4%yoPNzn&bM zys*4ipEvD#2>DH~_;Srf$veyGd`f)m2e$uOE-3HWADcWg?%eqZH_oqdfnm9=V=fSiVG#`!W1I=CSh1xq>ha zdj+3e?>!EVqm19qFZB>|9nJSRm}kBh(zonz9m;W*b|Oc6d64|Yf!piQ7W8G5yyTVd zQ&qvwE5785?`@2iSH5Slu)K;sz8AsYdmC$B`>S*O113B<iVpyq5;Or{vvsj`zc&pbr&a z`YHV;jHBL4$VcQDzn}bl1Nz7DE}`U{{y914$3ta>OTG0mPE|qYI3ewpm&~V4ocG+r zd6A*hOx!oEyZ-Md2An6#?@sxBW(WGm+n3|>?9j0$-bMYcC;|DP?}{W&u4fp>qVA*d z`E>tH6EFACDzGOxl671$YQ}TUzd7)mfI6?@&j9p=eSai*x4%2$KJ1+D47b%fjUUc) zC9He-oFZK`dHm1%m;aSx6zf&|;5x=GM;U=4$91pmkCu~mOdEuC*zW*}yyPqXod0=F z5&R*bj!o8$nUfxMzo(J%(ofmmIsfsT;>>aWe!_a^JjVQGTK;}pMmfEo<<486HziW@@LPfkcDD@(K+0Sb_mOakrd>%!6LnRl~j_l_(BliC6Z%3&U{Q2a%fcs&z zmsfI9U-6y&^~L#``&z7rhAJoVRzLQ?x70twt0!rvBlA1*#C1vE(qsQ#arh;_9?sW% zzmvZ^lsM5JFX!tf-UDU4Vf8(JP<}a2>UB#{eby{{ocH-2ChfJATu^&W;`@84M>kJ+ zuaWOnQcvV0FTNnZIj?8V_3{{iDyxN&o6=TA%^pX*gx#w^UM9j%cuCobCgETe}Z3SB`4!x9k@PU zN$5$?JC=L|c;BMe81KoRAEGA#deox#(T)-py$E{RqGv$QS@baIMT_1-Kde~vGU#=S z9tFK+(d!t$x)!|z`oN+mK@XSwd5C}>Q*>v1nwV60P`m75{>dmgsbBl~E$923l5_M= zF8lFNL*X+2$DqFjy5qyBOV%sV8_oX7|LZz&2>s)&6M26T|EbB}O4khs3wwSWUcx-T z%|ia}N8i4AQJ&wjoDNp6hq%8$e{8vt^#}5@sO!!q{Okd8-5EZ`YcH~n8XVwXca|v+ zIbBcUcOLYGtvf}I?Ib(hyjNBP)bU9>q<+GdnWIV|dxAvb)q&tB~oMGTqK*pitlsqS`-}NY7W&GsxVO>t*uzv@Ha-vuI zCG*QT_&Xt?)4VvO-}Cnvq?}`8)cQINd9IH{PVC$7hh~*tvClkmUCek&N>1`vBd+o& z^cd)E@*TUfj_N5~^4mdPhoI{`iLY`6#l>^68tQk6q#nZCoAypU!-Q#{iJzIgkuG}0 zp9X$UO>l{OWF3xmHrI7!lxMl(zsz{Sa$FB`{l#@$OO7`>^%C!Q zhf0rIKlr|c>mk}J!f(+RlsB$VxSkU^X%F`A{p3&g+L_qnI?i4XRg|3MGroz*x9F8} z;S0?=B@W1ZcCB*l|M>ISzSxxO12VqI8J=G{pWGL*^Etf4=!yQ^K3`&5PfqHY?TIja zrN@{0weKG?WiOB7cl8%Wz6r?thk_*+xx&aL02!aYUlxCOe@_^NKUu^fc@@9x`@x=N zuMInW%U*ba=fBuv+=NlYK|A*Ev}aU#H-7ln1Y}$VB`0-!F>TS~pyw=l6YZ{O(JP==EP5RD zxU}%S?TBEqV;}fkn?*@+FI2 z!#G^E=)H@KpACy10ljU}`xy6o7QJ_Y(KEE@5zr&&`14T4eQeyKH*t<`%A$ur&sy{{ z?u!c+y@~txvPJLXzPo18Q=m63dIRxxEP4v`zD196UOd+yZxQ<;QH$Qex*%cEyV!qA zTl6gGIg38P{!h`OS3$2>^f>5si(Z94EsI{pzE{_x=RhAQx~wC@=XvqVIx!2qG0>f{ zYSg9gOZZ+4fA?1l2aR)C=(X3AaqIV1yYHFrv`PVfh~Lc*gMasu`>dSjyDB~@H~7e3 zZmjiWq@wfUeP7M>BKP$Ne=z+?;+A>V-cMiD^<6>P6F*Z!zn^2R@0wP*@F)IqW3BH7 zs+`Ot_WF(SB|BbxLG>BO`paJD+Ih&F|NoKpEpXFSWBb$dyl)MnAu%aTUucrU_>#sU z2BmR`QGX1fN%{<95ltvUYxU})c>-@P^J-?lfN*LzdRl!KnZzr|0`AIJOeO-)lC`uXE{y*G6|I)D6K z`na2?Xl&4rY5eW?W7CVH^I+)@h5mqE8dv+{?}DL=tEUXd>zz-B{VU?o@5h>k59C!y z-w@fxI5ejXZgY_WJfsPIY!|)Q=SnAIPhH)|G1!%D$SRTRi`7i?*{V z>64VJeynfG#r0#^t)U%|-(mRyq2$jDpE&#G_(hL2LB@c*!1&JfB5}a$&`nF zm9C?25UL-m8M>ezm&QEzL;HLE`L-#`Cn;a!wZ7pK=hr#u{eI3LuO&Vf+6}$CEH@;S zU$cfTPF|Mu{VzoQ7`4yu=SqeTGro1fw2ZPd@@ zJ`wr}@|x7MODOxwh7Rp8w@q|DIzf3ELiKYUQx5$5%pVhq|L{(p9$$9)cL_z8-#(;^ zvpexsS8k*JC;Q2e5A-VbT)8Tt%g+RPK0({?iPL*{rjx%>`<@s+ zi~3@@E}`^Jek!ytPF{-iDf$bYBc4O6;@|LryutrDJtu^cSNG^zK*yaLNr z2qkZ5=um&bzr|0mMSsbD|2-)6Y0v&X?I)C+oS}mp&D#r>NIyI;>Tf?z>V^;eJz}|; zC$D4Z;^YnK_vSaE^8Dw{)bN44BI&DyvM=?S&<}C)^5;4^8$EZ*h7aT=&UWQ8gp$`V zbU{D4RdlGQ#d_)Hl$84q74KJVd6#Fsq$lk=J$#mYCLX@eesAvKYs9BM8}&ni_^gK?^LbS8@IB(o z9==X|&BG^&Z+iGPpUWK&pC!KU;rkrVj68gi_^F2xu_p1#AiJGjPnh7 z4?iTnkYYjoPdAv9yQR z`dH4xYkjQf;k7tm@e zgnq#LN!FyX?$ssV0`VG0Ee2Km58q$<`?PZZ<@ny=v1eSfRIt?8hq1h!zyGUF{x>x5 z_qOGjeLeNNx%rE(^y5CDgZKH&>$b$u`}=^#EO$inu=BTOR_mkhDYf4;dAig8(2IZe z%WYGu>9zk>`#|%g|H$3H`}XaUi*KY>3c-*1?#-98LKOTF=SO|F`KEL4a>*x}ILz-HF)$31(QY`HAq(`UUt|xLVOmV_@8~3 z-6H>uzRTAB`~m6zx!W_Jz20}(+BZKV{T}D@fz|E2Y;9>FT*IsXLx?lYtDo@aiG(E1gA9}>Ub{sMcB z=tJ26-}>m+-}`Q#z4{Z7Yx56a{zL9^%{}h^=l6fg&p(j)hyQW*?6dy#$!(q9LB0N; z^V`ZgEY~Zy{AzrbVjHyhAr1Y`dVl&_$023+Pm3vIm?C*p09PL*E*N8MQZ83g5+C4`#t{(ir(KkIh#h0GX`tGu8{04b5@4Qag4SgU_{ZEO_eV52{?>Tj-;ZA0Eoy(^8&UhUA3gnc=LgkS)6gMK zx=h>q*MYD6l;u47>BSB|_3$;~6K98dfX`@W#=D14vwY6OkLa(WhwljsZ; zQ_G|m&nd=tmw3e&>Q6t!dF?5lUq9~l1;yQG3;R;6Z+pH1`a}Po*3>znUl1>P4k=#Z z&cy`(BFlAN>HH2|!Qa0xvu5}s&eYEeW|`kKbkIZhuu8t#L)Xxuza5!0^lI+!?3sJ` z!7dJ;JU6r#^^q}Y)W?MNkS9K_K0v2_MCaCPys0_^guN;+STpiaum1UeIxnytBOm_N z{ikZ@Q`!Z2$WQTpR^=CW4edp~?%`E_*UQ&E!OBnHJ1h@-)E^2?sb}&$N0%im5<)N3 zXMy*&YMw*>s~S4gXD6CY3{4t-?^E8Gc=;7_^t1J&@7A^NPc(qAM{y{a`lhqP|8Cvi z&o_9rYkzstTRjk0)7M1z?WrI3zgusyJoG{Qc9?FD!*-QRY+X5TtA3fo4+s-KbLpYs z1Nqh0M&;{V41L$G_4U;GVf{jWhUxOJqVjc~!kl_lE_eAI!lL1W_lYv~+XIFLzlT2a z%rkGj{BaHZjr`mzT=_kL2!4m2_nB`zV5#s&{Jm(0C%gO}`D*!R<1_T+^_XAg_t$afT0q{aeP`x-?ZxweY3(WD zI^fGne>>C{_!RMJ4?m?Ja~{4!e9^<#iLV$u+G~UQw-}Fe!aV8ghTgV^Q(#c=yU(-A z?|i|jPdONWBTfgT-)x*#Ul)zj`%F%Zhq6&Tmkb~HLHkks z{ULQjhj_B|BnLjXez-O5rdH6o417T3`d-`(@?40`e%YTf&ZM;7jh~Rhdt8V=JE1rAYmG~R|zxKKG z$X9WXeEkp?!N0{%aOCNs{{JG<9bLKe@4tEAb|)dZ=>Nax{38B}(>445*GJox_QzUy>xF2+Y{nM`&YDITzYg2AJA!kiuQ|dw!LWoy1zfgZ!f9uhj9XV+MnX@ z7tb3y)Pu%Pf@$s-*{HoV3?InT{**q;%MV>chxQ^m_!sd!Wd6+10bf>n7}^E=lzvTn z_yO@b58q&Y6+L{N^c90gd(nQG7UOYFm?wSR(8F$j-;2h{eKQV=^RxDstn%|X`kbA5 z^8EcXnqNx&AoLU3sorl6g`$}FezCmpr>A9^ne1WCcV zkpuhv{VuY9ctzMw;`nI43nZbP`QLR;Jvsh97q$E34@0|y_*m9Cc9rD_K9MC|DN3Ih zP)^n01AP*`Z@GHtFuxJW5B+<%b5)}F_#6f{ogWj$493S;JY9HwzhxP^i&X$5nL*Jb0-NO&q-s%PqecKOl^Ei6H zZkc@O;qU)ZJ#Ewv%;?9B`hl4zZ`D4b3tf9lUl`hL`+=iSQNi!;J0CInP2s9V*dk7~ z|EI!on~l?kkpuhveLb?@_5+9?y^q>`H>i(1_sh%-U*LyKCx2q?3fpIw`I$(5*glVQ zW+yIq$2H&H>ypOrk%Zma=Tm06&Dvczau)UO?eme{8?{gE^MO8b?Q`nM@%Q(reI_po z{epHA{9F74?Y^Ff|4ljgIm>j-!w;xO)8K9U?J&P%@}Y;?tze#XeM1-5eiheaLx=X8 z7=?B&;)V5|_3%Tslf1!0-_f0;?YCs|p@+YpN%go<`_+D?joNR|lecO=6Wj0D(AoBT z0_$~jhqrv`ho5-q^N>UwYoAi)V&|XD#&Lo4j?e1-N3!3x-?;eF{v+^-i{qXr$KQ9P zI35`~#HrrHOJ{`R2-N$Gbm^Z)&frn+dX86_UyS63{luGKK=9kS{n4K+9dKJ2 zf5X4p@6=$q&HA@vo{!LvH`T=s9q}P5b`8Q|i;_6ZRsbIJD zf8CUW|4U4_J^YmR_6#2W*K>Zz{GrK*9_k+iE2Ntky10Hq?I&?*Xg~UitVu)PIongo z!#9bq7(DdtJSN&t)J;D0@b{0Y9yjVIv=3{eeq!v&^Y@u)yq~x%wA=O*??eR#zq_Uj z_xaIdo_r4eMjSWKba7N|nXg`hRNVEZPD0ooT|LUacMClVb zruzmD|EV8H5kE5das5D-c25mmTtA@pksOD5qaVnbH1y4|-pU@n$M#k=c<4L4XS5$^ zn0)Br?=w_AY}5~E-`ht0z{HccYQG}K3(3nvyKO)4F$7-l`}reZKf3V_&ClU)#G&>f zmRN4Haac2Q7WQ+$Uye}rZ`2R?`wRW|{)s2Y-(RRWP5dIX8|_^4Hf`<;guRP;CtWd0 zpXgIg#o%o_Z!^Ch$q(E4ry(Htz50pQ?e^FEG)~6f@UQkK_E>JS{v8=P@UQk0YTu#! zyHPtIbDyHqCm0Vf-6fR&3crl^U+bK3yaE4JNY{+gC(=xJ4Boc$Iqm72{J3`BBHhT) z#kF(A|IE;#ou_{lu_KXXy%juspY5q+@X$B4CECubCLj9hdw9Vv-!G~hKeX6?w8_6= z%EOMqvg5D$39X-Z3?1y4m~`Oxr55KQl2=6RTdHtAGVS48oX^jB_zKsriXMK#b?1t~ z2YMvxCXINmkgi31;FDFq#rF`;c6KUX-$!Y_M0mxe{Gji-L~p;R3iR13I+Q~^&Z$S{ z%Fr*+J7?0+dq}z>@m9VJz&e8Vx9D7Q-P^YN7a#JfEg4Zd2zvj%yaxGS@QEYdx8A*N zIv>49`tzQ0c_QxKHhnMS>t!_wY*`hTItN|%v88_P{Ik}5Y!ja6r+auN)GN<&)?e^v zo%r?c!Gm5ZCzyVASWk$PR52PSwO6=xnNf_~pnWd4_+7R5t#!`1zROcTnVE!g5jO>; zUl;aoh?}bLfrDY^jCwSPmt54U4boZv1@*bq zXMZca{0M&NFMIs{P5pxGn;E&5kNRbwPnO?1DlX*r{BOg!fc^SzQn1T%y5Cvjw6(sY zgx-kL={=%x-7s<%cD>5QoxTgzzLKG#L!3^T_U{EO6QBBBs6Xga#Agj2aa}NJ#Opxy zN4)$G{q?is$A1P>ANc+J+I?@k^KO?v27lZ99r+>Iy&rV;%`e~Y2dDY@J2C%+onLhD zeZP6p`;m|Sb42+%4@u9(S6_eZHktzfEqw>*x1Cto6c<}g>z`U!q)Fh6lbG~d!Ko)f%>S8=EJ_TtUw9UNz;z5^Hi zm~xJK>4WCJozO%5iuNg~oNNOObXqmPqVrwzSBG%~KeTs>#&44O6+&wt;=S+DZ}z+L zzLAUg9W(9kQ%d|k)DQMHMMu2VM>fNbq}Lx6FLd`f$Bjc^hkvfE=)iL^4n4}XTlGgP z=iVCqg7&s#{U7J|A?fvfHux|4jXhj{sr%Q*hA-r+p4E@Zp2Rhwf8fWA(&qUFe24ss z$`9nCf2f!={97Vjo%neFE^n9rgNu`Y_uiTw`ERrjOy7M@NWalpUMh z2e#JzhBeAVeIov5TxZa@s=)j`k!#)?@|okIQujnv-hMg z`WfkK?1LRc;RE@wqsH_kMjmv;4|?Xj_k{c_ot|;~CZOlaxcC^?UrSFrU$UU%_;N(3 z_r7^4^f&CO{lTSYuMgiBf_PlD52H;w=#6q^^0E8ZQO@6AF*4;)ZyFN__Lx64bkJY> zE2Ou^`NKIZxrXLKZW+j`LD_M8oz%Vz1-dBDgDca z5B#h6(!L_eYZyA{ozA=WTk+{}e*=86h!?NjX*@hMeB$&LKfRZMALQkp;{2%m)GV|g z^0KtINVszUnW0;>SEg-y1%67s8XkRz__l{{?CRwAJbaGyLl0kIdz=_N;%sixh_eaf zD|MseFMHt!{p|aO#!d3?H=cBKT78P8*ZYR(i{yXvncu!*z4wjTb*?{DIq?JxbX(Pr zXT@%3T%JN(hTm;JkbZ&S`je%CzTko4Cc^uYbr^LzObPOmxXcfZ3)FIms; zJ=(EZzt1_Zk$JK6pZs3FIc!I0zr+2be$O($L1^O{e(w{%zTboK&AlC8l^>n4{`-5| zqu=QLAfI;rE8G&=6W4DQvM%3$Ui$Y%HVvP}bI02!F8zCk4*kSPX)|61zC!$5`9Ywg z|498c)EE9tF+WSZ{DpR*AL3Z+2x{M2-?-tid%Sux>l+pFKlAC0$FH}(q5hyn`u*P2 zIB_%U8`4WU1EM}OuPdnjKK-?D}8jVk_ zTPf~*zCH3?e;q1#f4NhXuinSw`K~?>LH$VS;_!JC7mu2E9U40LThDyKHuDw#RgR-j zKX{H-f9mwryjAmWHa>&u=^bbkWwTV~!z;F7Yf2erl z+Wd*mpKG;ae|}f*(fLwnZ(Ka7T?+c`v+&?(J!bzI@%&rCrmXiQA&~^t^T{zYq5e>Eis@YPdLV zQ?HHMWzCbD_1dN6b_^Zjb-=X$o>?S*>d|ME{#U3!_;l!>w1=+~pY!ku;)@<$=bTgw z9&ukcX~g}A@!ldnF7AVM!L8ks*l(Wb{Q3OzUUAoLDz0T<98$fLn;%eo56SPk51(-M zQpwTjf6)8qvrb8W)ivilVYwhm2SM+j&zeqrZ!ypEr;Gpfo4E5<>pMDqilj^MedEmD zpTD|w6X&zmS?)*AyzruJGpqH{xJ&J-OZq2VboC|MZQ^{^G3g(F-;=i{z4KY){HgK% zMMvN1wM$+l#rZS8jq}g*9`xmcf9`6WKdYp_X1|~QWQ)fiaiV@ger=Q9dL}5gs-IZv zoYtW!kAAhuahKlnlFXkGT9wehso&80hUNq8_lbyGozp6P4?OpZpKdkhvodndyzrLu#0EadD7le%sK&51Ox+d_8yjhAybLEfbT5UYegy zZVl}QUh~swgGasROd9pxq+g4~uT}54Bcp!Qcuw_c%fTLhyt3ANhx!BgU*rGHzIUuO zUhv;L65EFUfqtrYjTa<0XXsFW8kY;|eW%LjxyA#C=eYNsy5YBocW?Y5xm}OWA1`Pe zZ|^@`@bkynykE%P9|k)ATsFz|?;+CrfMC}f@2tERyv9Ah{d<-C_k!wnp5IxnOsF{O z8al-9kZJ!s$pY~+k3P+GG8xJPpBep{@$f_9^B%rLe96O)**>ZszOl0#cQrhGkMwO1 zKfK8Kt!MCPmqU|AyKJ!hgm~M&5Nr6MKW^|`a^<&*ZaqJ)KVHO(*WbpC)8V(`9h@IG z>TheLgFfJ|cBS?#{_{PeLj%%2)M=%M~}MLy>ll6MT_1N~{v zq+z%E)3S$Ge_Azo)LX-(QEzGL(I#H?0{`fTaZ_*S|7^Z~ME)Di8&`&|-%i}g+5POZ zKmC^V=8X%~D@Xe6_y4~~#LXM4f7keRMUIRNApD{JUG{4HX~+UEt{(3dc6ag8q8^%G z?lX<@i}>gF^o4ki_5nuA~MdGU-K0|!N!|NWZwujd} zR6P%`d#HvUe$IA2@$fz3=N?}7P^In`^+V<)*M74eUiVNHJiP9qDtma{Lsj$eRqE69 z@VbYpc53hTuavomyP!&DA?xCu9_#Ex6 zdwAVL)$;IDKEJviUiVN9JpAabuD-?|UiVPVJiP9qO5Q!{2i-%J@$kBbD(~TS4^_#- zx2aFn!|NWZhKJWZRBeODc(G^F7>~5+mm%>%pS0=+Iz3-?-mS*9mN>3IOYG$Q;g4I! z505@~2YZ~qm+;+;;Tfu67jbF;WPYT zhwy^>ZVUMsj}IObjjPsP?z`<~3}4u*_Xy2zYCLAY$3h&9rLXx80(KmJni5U*Zba~#PNHB^mlo~oBy_% z?;WI<)g-WG)%Om%cShekOeklq?;Xl}xcbriQjhe>ot+=8zu?az@f&^b(91^aeR`vN zubA!R`fvy1gZaL?3z zonC5Z>R&R34*g3pnoiVA8h+}Le}j1WLB0gE?M&}~YG)7n^jAuoX=i=%f6y-v+Hbvf zrtjURr2k^_wYzMlok=gNH~gvjPeFa}rgm1`)%kU;b~fhvzS>!u^ff~3uZ2H}->986 z4~xcC`2?3%TtxY<{{BbxKI1$z?1sIH8^KY|wOf5R06MhW>aDIn*Y`Y?dq?BTZ?~1> zoqkP^PU{<5_mN(9-EBR+H1EHbUUN^L#w(halwO(pMD^GFrN%YVYqG2J2js1%*Q)gZ z&tEN1Ue8+(kY0U52YH%j5!Cua)0>}{KL*=H<0Nt4sGa`$g5oG==+M8GnD)O%7*oHx zM_(nr<>3p&cRl=w^)&GCUE;?cK2QA2;4uzJW~_a|cQ~ZW5Fhw()err2=TT8VH9z6z z&*Rz?;(y@Liw?{&o>70Q_2kNVZl1Sk^b7P|lD|IHu3;Vh8o7vLJs;GL)DPFqb89jF zV>!Do9OJ3N_Rg;(<=-!~3wo+v*V7YpdLH=S8Tt0;xhYtpym~}#cy5LNzGI)quxrS2 z{=UNCK(WPpdPn&Y{(=AbJlM#t9@mZ6vkUfX-Pr#w%eP<8CBf|doxe+jbwZRw{p$Sf z^`8Im!-(bVI`E=?`Q2iN`E$b`@g+S3bM#Y^bg2i}cnIQ+-&HHl)P8b?4&&lVG@WRg zH2hU(ytRq9?L$7pxLEtDw60&QyYar>zRYW|`@evpg$>@eMZV^|*eH2DoZ`tI?L zZsOq^#Lqo^p7>NYtY7d?5uY`9JckP=9p}HvYn}YEp@Y5teUYl4s-Z)?w4&)m-=tBm zCF(yU-ufLr!w>Z}cyx4}l1sU9_?qkd>?d#UI9B70F8dM4NBw6%5S3rvGxRU~p?;^x za@t4PFm&LfbJS#~KYmibr0>_Ye{g8{pgyNe+waEFFRZ%%?t!76kgxL^*OIUPPH`;x zMZ*X3t4!Pb3nAa%zuhwB0-3AYXO{V0LkEBA`vu9De}{$+@ijAP=+&WL(tCw=1D_*4 zYw&UYDn#>_b1#Ti}RPB+jBz)e`OvN z^^5kq7d^c8>6Q&X&R;c?4?S{qH}9+OoAf-f18^8GkUJ|xsT&fgvK$r!r0IFf%0h7NI5HEHOTCcl=4@3I~`1`mJv`u0tJoW4!+ z85z1beKl^L89L~jerV_q=&SFX3Lakj%}WL!luuMm8qci+`;!Los#nCVei-NUPU3Tl z-}P$0`C8{&wLJPh`Ny4ah3BGwzSNZT@#j%3EsgkncgJt@1SDaX{8!95 zf9X3(*#wC5%~BtC?Sr3yCw6|?BQAQt^}jnE`QW4Xi`E8wa^!O-6byc~7k}WJ?|s$M zqwqKQs2>}XkH(A0*AM#C$mh;P&JQ{J;%@hi3$_b=I3CD6Y<;_0tbJY?LhPBYTrAicm2uAI|zt_pMCEUeVhEIzqT^0~yr}1vo*P5*n;Si0r}mo(u6)PM=Z@x+>-;VmI^elgd`EP?yYO)5PvoQj z)pM&zKC-`V=r$w2$#Jv)J+&`?VE975*0FOZyXU9m&kdcer!@DwitfQQC6&7RxcG;*Mi|DC1k zWA=y8Evbk)gA8J`xHAzvHI+RId8LOTUZ1VW;jz zP3Lc)oq5tbKEXK_A9VGi`&Ffnt*>C5v{iH{hx%(suHk3vuR?r3k{`z5eqa>*?tabe zgv2W{i^nqTD)9c*nfMhA-;R|NdA0Y8g6P ze~+iqyIyeQ`A`4)$!|e&5vLz^a>p#U**KjWInYPU5A{`el=F|hm(|u+ zhWS-O=xOaZ0EpoCj2Ha#rQbQ=iFd@`utWEYbXab)b_|Rh*r9tVgT{%MFVVCaPm{Lx`Zs_nH(lKf1)nh#k z4c_XNXa3ma$LTdu) zo=;sv2faony@*fs_a1)0=UsBY&@QX*Y#;Z&oH6-v`Zh_IH*|6OYTQvabkMh9($F_e zy}AZ(^~ycm>D4#+ae58+c61{{7pIrTV>3esz0!{j{Q|w(93K@te46-@!9!o|Yb$eH zSvC34H~6>s2{ueV^c-*N#uaL>S|{rmI_NntX)CwK_nfK8kCQt$`EhbJPn~{T=nu%v zN7IRlNu&Qt^L?#GyzHde3t-2YT91{zU)}fqm#Pm@8T&pU`Y!o@=fVRn^v9XdLw?iw zaw;dDfbffC3HB~^{bRBa+Ku^xly}bQnDTR^vv$Itnji4jt?YMcLA|Z|zHPJT$MuYU zh|>|%{`qlD;^&4wsK-R=@u7Y2SDE=);;lXMS@8VYs&fqnJeT3R=bv}eQo&K6o`zp` z@vHgF3i+L|`=!?}d*>j4U+%wLdlkP!zW29%bbdn|zn=6vZl7J3Dc4Eod*%V|9EK6; zME{u`Ub*9z82bMHj=n+q#1ouf&VJ?{J{fmzL+(dzU0e3$NWcASzH(^XxecWsI(ogw zR!G0&0nfN~y>lBHl+z;p+b=8KhI1S25A~*Y+I=tk4VLri)E@L*xb*Sq6t_ADUUphK z)SJFO+)X4|- zq5Za)_Sf+Xd>&{%qaQ7|MgH*RYW}Uv`8>&;Maw6W2RM7|cUyR#l=%ICm2ESc<5h_U2ngvzVEJ(zWn(gy*h5c>`ENb4z)Ac2nhdceo9c^ch4X1 z`cv(L9Z(+1A+CFOasJVFL@nk|32j`%@0kOgKi2z>2=6uee&_@~jQ4wUjl%hARm65kY4=d&&$8~nsdYxwD@8C;qR->y)v{D z?N|Lvk@GX+mwU4F3;3Y_Dlu*M=>wl6zq+Bvz8dw5Q~GrvJ4x3v^zfh7`_r#p+kc?b zJpGV#o2}=uTOkArdV!h=%A1Py@~uWHgxE36HkrUnb0{XS<+=qew_Rk*H!X{E>6DMUD?nHGd)gMjUFrtx7&?`A7ABZxjrEuYdi!KXlRI z_ggHxgOBEEdh76stM@AX&?B4^7RaYbI3k2>@KN6&sP#U7z0JR$pipxD0w45)6Rz_m zI3KS5r)ucXezcCX8wv)$n{(Uj^@Qgg^jrK5``awvW4X=F2ak*#=u>^SYX?n2>Eq99 zr=RKUnEo<+PT_q(>qv9*Eszd+T08C!MDQCI-}r$yKmPoi@i*+yJYb#WHfu-Q$cd|; zCdVcII-h_4*u?Nz)DPD|6Yp_$${)#t!+NxK?FmDI-*ZlS>wfoq@mYuBZ`jpi`4Y=* z)~=e71AVeBr$>=c`q=sjo`+jS2l*I3^vP#p_}Thu6F-aOhjI5{FbaNq-|eZ_efQd@ z--5qkm)2pkhd6(1)~+Jy!6&Z1v@Sa~<0y=?{Q7DcKJbs`z5R9BzM+eg*JXV8>r(#r z0*U_@);r{B{@-6$%o@5ld0Gdns{IFkfPH>{Q8RoXPwOB$2S@eaHgs|F^c_ORTX*y2 zO$;B%)4GqpK9qb`=m#7BPez3Xzgynon#GLEH zbuWJ%PUrui9PDb5Pv7u^U0R2$5kEBfaq*F4{>0G1-~KwB;vw;zu>LVl&zdy!%F>S| zgSUEVeXwHk7{njHgwQyVA6{?V0=#v-s+|G!MVwg(@X1vsdDItIK9+A zR&)bTjgI-OOUc?ulQ$2&XdJXs-ADH|&y~?B;8@gD%*iX+59rVgP zFZ2uaYI59DG-WYXv-t9-Aj5HCAv_5v*C9li78yW6;PT3T;(;~rZM z`mOlkXqT^ZZ0z}vuv6o7!788kmS5nnwN~H2&O3 zUd8Z%eR@yV{Ji8f4PD^>CE?*n$d??!k)em3{(Tb@lMlIiuOD$;U_?6;FNoTyIS)a} z(fCc{D(D5dnm^Kh|Dxfys87~Qkx+8$h7R^go}lFFJxt@Pwd4*AzlFV=r_w$l$(^Q3Qk_#xx7XYfHhB!(u9_SYue zgm}dT^wbY@YTvz)TaR38JzV7l(}#s|fp(lZJlc+WOKu*#KsuF!Y{;z;Km7gbb}s!e z|5p1C&pGW=&PMAtI;Uky`puqmnyxrMtaZ+*)@@|RX4h@jI={3|dGHbZUi%;CcdgqL zncpGw{XQmsy>*+Q%&Pt~{cJaX>7N7UuM_0YardX@4tIXB@)4(n^ISgkU$jHcZ>rzX zIbcne2i>B*F@1Z_0UH=TkU#ilRKDi5^!>NwCtnoCH{_?8zP;yw6$~FdpZ#@P{~R!X zeRZRAz?$UWHFDtB`5Nbd4Gmr3k1aEk4(wbiGo3ynV*k>Ze#{#DqCQO;?Yd05GV!+l zQJ47Hen;zrdX75^_dnuLU+KmV{TTW1zkd#!e@>Er4%nW*dtE!2 z#PG%Yz2>>~oy1}P`~LqO-+I!EoqgeVRJkLa{jzf-y-K79-J(74oQ1mZ<~$MTq4Nc_ zKJuKM-*MF^p1UQ3^6-!P*Zu~2XdEc0`Tw!xQXid(+#gPTArdExws-*7`&IwUwQEwc#XI|p`WY>4&__gWhEcujJ4*VAV)f(p~)C?Wk zODCF63{4vGkf59~@qsR@erOL>HC@%={Ng*&4Bb9eqTd7HakvR>-(C_%R)ac`rll1oHnCAMbcTn z!tV{@Z|^uQ@e|kY`{OkK+$o(aHI9*wIOy@*DO54qr}{O2oR&K(v=ek%-_v-i!t>ke zN4oJN_#uw-r$_G}-|YGGEhBHyE(dNsUwZocqBNcxn{v=o`)sryNBwl^gQ1>_eu?{J zH2*GpTK^N$#o4pjbLcBahyH^-xeKE9Xuf&QbK+%B*DE*o%K7J|%f5*z2m4me6X&_( zvaj-z_3cZ4D9m5fJIfEe^UDjzg!X~1cZ!S85uxny&)Khi*3q>HrN2FAeil` z`OaqG@Q90`ZLNBr>3z=S&!`9JP>=rk_=%TC^{=s9i%{~ih7NqXzi{7ms9hI-6!ll` zG$+4AC_XjACr8{+A<<`=>Z}`AZUD6Ldc@skyCvQf-PCp;|6ZZM%=VyHfv*vt_V5Yf za~{4$KNdZFk@$*-AG2N5J$z!Ti<6dz?~%Ui;hV${JbdrNj?dV`7l@yE_z~N4^0=rU zD&(K>@M+@n9)8IFv*h7t?02djK1=$Bhwp#D>EHJ7MdEuNzEA!`4?ldr<1_K_W#Z=^ zUiS{9{x|9e-8+!=@Va-P;Nct8r|jYL#MeB$?j2})_!Q|o9$xnj^gX=p9T<6d-8(S# z@KZe(UlFxe_YR~zyzU*yd3fDBQ1tM+cc9|ob?-pk!|UFGmWS8916>cVdj|#{UiS`+ zJ$#S$&OE&C9Z0@1>W3=nGag>|4&*(2rsd+Tdd{I=)er9l&7ZjO%)k3yP$&P5 z-V1czPnYyhdFq+d^}f4rUhl@^W77X&kE7@7eRnTAHv3*MxQ5SZLVb6ie|6|rycbkn z7=15DGQUD-{knJ`BYwU20{DIWd3Ueozw7rImB` z2YLRv&27U6@)Q?ZrU&_@jNqW_$$wJ@(ru)feifMhs54deOvc+R(+mL@0kKhMCY28Bo zsMeor)B|*j{*UR6?osWVa*(h4K-QA4`8<7RBKb4J2l7*Ibbhh(`)DWr`Ga}VLGM83 zs`wg_Z^_WX4?3q*^7VYF89KC&wn;-Toj*A6@VaMpWbml>sY#>W3$nAZcD={h(L2V) zu|K~$^3E9>alRuT!yo$Oe(C0i;IBwL@cSFhi?vuDbg;X_^zB^-9~wT8U%MhIf30=! z)SH}tBtOIS?Og{i8a|LeyD}!gST;7BYqmm5A9xT^b2IX=nc1A_kf*Vd$H3uSns6#%v*1t-38J+KEb*R z`RLwQ**#;w2RhVy@Ne-G^zV!H@7L{la{ToV-LE?`bk@I3v+e^w&PbPjTeKZCiO(6l zZJ$-<7fn9w(Kt&mLAr{ei)){X+lHY-`|O%D^i8PVJ$#GtJu!Ib>yLxyCLexLe_B}% z`&r1z{?Mg!Cq?}-_<_S04c^9GhxrwgZ{_5<&VWjXoF>;x+EMyMhWMVrTmL7RKQ#Gq z{;xBCV(8-hzp_5o4DE&gvnCCFbF{DI;Ri$Kmx{qdU;jO$Zt|h8-Y*1etj84fZ5ev# zt@jMAd+0r*XXv2!#H0hgmnM8JCf^>~2YiM2w1=N?9Fa5lfN!E`(Eq^l6GcI;ZU z`+xC$C+ADFuCIQ1mybPT_m#H7LW}PV>TVn^`ZoE0_mL;PQNEH4=;6N)shns41BT4cyu=;phx{NOmPe&1-_5=cbto5n5QhV% z{r90d@l!*OdP}@BtatdU$ow?%)*i^f5B1Rg59b$47yMwC@PfnZ!tp5THN8*N|GJkmdvbjH_w7^r zZ(Seqg?)9FPZ;}PM@RTTzeW3Gx*sENVMOpB+GpY0=Pu%+&wIPnuU5XZSM0gk8IOKO z{y%)y)kpdLD*RC0CF+OFdz}4ses?PWK_~k?slMaoAezE&WQ6I^cv&Y^yf_9K29`c}%o>78R z$}JkY#dCn)H%gx3qHO2_{#zO*ZS5KV$;C@Ik{^DLs`DRyd*;qZz5B`+J_!23uPf(2 zuw0y9?f0lU|KXtbwko@Cchx<_NAm-j_d37C@rm=tTyj|s{A@hvoQQ}1?Wl);?evp> zCVBdfthJ6jtGCXH*!Hrsmb1B=!tY?Wj=!YpS2&fX6Vo^+9nOX#@K!JF2OXLGIK8wVbZY2g^X<^vanu^r}*?vcW?yeOI1ge%0hdUY_T|mkCvmwqFY5Z55sBr$atN!!Mv)8k=;S z-3{i?3?1~)J$90>ek$?7sNGqUw)R!oUP_Vtr6ql*zAqFHey?3>?R)TDyO-f_^i$e5 z-C()3){FEk5*+-^#eMSc4t6}b+Q*>t-7h+E`qoRoFkN)lkgNHxIm^ZMYqpFeqAn1a6Ty-8r;=^IRFXF@d9(E;83|*YOrq1DK`L*QL3?Inz=LsdR zZRq0U6*;dtZ%6G*di#ARh7aWFyoLV9T{+21wnIN49&|pB=F8rF{#&2b+~J}}!7jvu z=F3Vfx7m5Znvny2{P{BJWBUd4JAIa$ec!#e(!VS7({1KY41a6Kvrr)T-M^VnJ@n3> zY2a_zp?S3QN1XkewIfe@$0wMd_>}W!olti8&mYmD9PDaHuHk3<`3muUlOGokbJ{&J zbnvhL{89bS3?2IU^hd+`hhACoD;T`hOXqNuOn#hRI)|fb=;HKJJ7^j@=+!gnMI11m z#|Cfp(m5PclOLy-&f!RWEVMgLFP+1YF?7(YXwuNDNWE$X54{T9M>Jx8)iC*xw=(~x z@5(t&SQY;)H%x{4;yE}m{Nn6vGkopA>{N0bH6BCn0J1+6PWJY|T%c>vfR`|cmz2B|%{ea2~W*XW1# zHe}lFUxXbqLkBzROea6(?6vyHj<~qk>^T7i@&zyWW15f78%%F>-vd@-NY8 zu3t6fAivJ^?ftHxWB4rWpGM`c^3!!IlA^=qt~R-^O@t(!Is-uhqbrfrjN<*c=CI*QV- zteZ{^-uhqbrioKSKg9XJ$MR`I7w3PC+wz7E{;!xc{H%4;ria(MY1`nTZ;Jb9<^P_^ zhhMaAUHWL)jvyz`{bAE6ePVba={^_QZT;V6e%j3lZIdBBd1r>!#9a<8$9$)Ju5oi>6v`!t9u^=i)^n$#(k0c z4^27fUtquHe?KrabkINZ`OrUs{!4v6Pl_HsPkhO@j~QB|0XJ@l~JW zls@r+&8vQk^(k+iPUod5Zf&_m{T=1%OY5N8S24+k@f8;jTJN;{f_hqYu3Yg8q2C}+ z^Qv0+lzufshxlkIZPo>W&k)~Ne&7Z8Yh=>!*NlFe5^wdC<1i1T@7~_a!1?ImH$648 z^svQw?Kc0@%>VAK-#zU6+kO9|;9>JmVg7r@iML*K^yObgKGq{Er#t&~ud(86%df^~ zY3&TO_$}5iNiVtv(+_;|uJ_lwv!izO8IQgvc^B^eA+?2&KEPZVy{BVB`uta2eOo`l zkEt&@{o7xU=36@Gt@&oXN9bOxuYc)@gC*~tE6^8z=Gt?W{6+tcli&V9|6VN6Yu-`w zaBY@**r_jjy*m|0Ryx1T-s|{l9e7Ck@&30QyEPTk;xF*meNpYpT)8>v4>|CAAKf;% zXKEvR^&Q2V&b`Yey7x&^;77fW$nNr&!ge9LK*p+mtbCmFd;4?;wXdsb$}irxd7hBI zyT~%XM`-m&JJfgZYWJ$Qy7?Y4i0`e{4?2HH-*5h_dDt=+vx9cGBs^?@{)%bA${Ehi zruW_I@N&nuME*6>fe-Z4IY8FH3c;N@T-sb*H2+nG*-y9zAV1eg$&fetGr4xyNn}cP}-<2+M=_c>hn_lhG|pij4$hwCV7}~N^SKUApGW-j9c;hA!PF5Bj$iCxn%{e6k8$bju?}`>4t8Jd zV5aWisNrDy&CEa1!Q@*V%)Q6K(ia@8vfh(Dmu{Tt;QT8NcG+)@&T{Gg*$x)Zb#Qu~ zgPkiJEMMth_ty@#xPPbmJD2WVCV3#tSq~DEpK&jmUOUtM+b}BJ2<|(gOz(am`yua-`T;! zy&P=q;^1Ug2Xh(XcXKegyMx^aI5^HS|Dg^x9_L{G@ytKK!P0>aPM+#u?NA42FLbbV zn1ji~9jqSVVE@GqPG90+sp??Ld%ztpJDk*`~bNWA)_i$4FYOP>1`q>!Kas*`gN2OoF%@nL7AKD6`Glwae# z>^+(P+v@L^GneeUI5!^S!Ni48eWVAG2H8IUsSvqnlrQGt+kgDvgWiz4%l?uxB)_RAC&%+}#Yb|UNj`;_eY5!KBTv1%@+D^%=HIfzhaU2% z*PnSD@`LBgHj<-s!PtT4h@OjrwXZqB_;2yPa%nU^RR4;T zz-KEz8?XBv=+N)n{@2f_+-Lj6ehuW0C}&SLq{p!6Y8-S_4xB2Z~D}ZUpe~%4*gXleyupD+|GVW?NlFW-copR{|!%{y%ze}dftbD`QKabb+3=?f89@A zesIs9C(p0vG4-7js-Dx|2-^+hNRMMEXY%|H{NRJ{&Ry;6u`l!QaLNVmI{F3EUm_p% zEICNW)pI8zZ*@KQOg`$l!gNEB{ldu5p`Jwtxv1wE^V4UC_5q(KK5Ou(=YmP2p1br@ znfUm6UfwQ!oO^zap5ruL=Qso?l`yYN&S-}DI@b9S{{VLku zv`9B4RQq!BSMOs`yRpv=_^EJ?^P63FT+CZt;@)!(Uc-ymJj(8bADI~o}}$e%~kiOe@c z`_cYVcN8$bt_^%o-jEw%MuXI0JUmfPp38katYW}Ll`PjAON@u|;>5GHVpEk~G z#JAtz+AZWkf0Y-^l26<4v2iZHDbD+b4skw-rW46;h5Ep+Y38Sim;Hj!3-#sCa}GGq zbJyngce1pi*L+`zd`16*cbxh-*#=tt7V+TCTQ*p3T;1UY^_7k~8V~+_r)U6SpXS|t zeJov^-zSux{C4Os#82;A(fH|+E=M}+3-sSJkAAK1ds-Zy%TG-s7wxmlw0+K^eU1zr z>@71rCA9j;X4p}=o&8pu?fwc@-b>0$XWY>F6yJA)_i5_?Cko7e^G(Sg|8O_%C)tuH zUEus!BV6g1zUQ9*&<*{P=#YlpEzv8Yf`@uI{ z&3#^55=EA;5=x)en?nDf-bDw#sP`u6dxXHlF9VZ?U*`13nE1GQ5A4`d;l4Qexz=v# zlYH2@HT6BGkJe2-|D``2E?VU0n6GuhKVJ6d2dE!IzMgj_(p`4&RTrq=it9gXr2FEf z?|XmTdewmUyhw)@>ErInvht<>O@H1o@Rs}Gd7*w#{mhK~CY-+qWx!`k^8DyI-FMyh zK^Kw@^0(%{@BAb?Z~d=tyjgYz@>V^+q=W8la&nfJOP-uM`63_s>bX1OeKBR`cRV_c zFUx$NkYDp$j{rZ!(^Tcnz4pKlh))f}cmzJ%aL?tehfk5dVDN~`vPmN@2lQ`^c=-YP z=!dwd|HSR*EuY}tmqyQZa*uq>lkTth3h9G;;=FmqF8OcNzV|uIaryARr|j_HU4Qu; zq=NcfO8&svy*q_G_{1GbSMB-6hakC#8|Lf2V9A^Jqy2W4bSMY^6`8IXJp9x!Y4~YO z{oBOHwO{yY{1)dQjVJYfam-`pPw;(f>Gj>}i2NV;%S*o==hxod9sda9V1yq~uulIKSC(m9%O?GXJ}jd6FU&p6K}Pg#E5&rWGA z#vjO^Ql8e8Zg}>AFMPgG^MU0`gupM_ze&UH zKIPYmU#ox9IkI{V=)LZL?{)I$Z5=}n;!)?wioQqwjUT=&y}JDe#zQ)PBGkmJ;^XWFoyOs#kGb~P<2)Jo>IXWtztqRqr_=K^N4mIq zbnw$Sxwa8Mj-y-a&>=oKeHrXnaKAR~9uQ6mQNSbvcG2dLl5mM()!Bmoop9|4()ZsbnUgFe}OL& zKlkZrZ|Y~EJ)kcWpY`x5;tL*r%6KaqeBj@N?5Z%oX7W*AvRANa@?rOw`y^$r=A*iX zF6g(m3{4vP4=-}|&kP>@b>ioto#+?pq)QVoJy0+DK@aV#8okHy)p#I%Md)YHWm_(- zb6xemX3x1?wCifLUC(Zb@|loN;=K;9^Bg-y|G>_beMyNc!}73yK)Pv^K2cYC9QpzE zlzWvsKS|G@w8^(}O7p0kEYqbZePZ%gM^`m?$nnonZkYVQ_pAEF9P`_T4t}n4y+qG- z)lc8hAuc8+4ZoCVfAaFse&C0{a{8tX9{T$GF>@v#dieLRslGQl*H!0HsGmTrAujxL zU0a?!?f2>MJPXBP-=ov{B4wUKA-!xI!rzK_L7gKZef)Drv%d)awy^($&Tm;l#c9#d zA%3(^ta@uSeyXHvMd=d>rn?3o7pDW04}FHzL;DY9w>@vw>XY@(L)N`SnO}x>B0lDn zlQ;OdcrKZI_*c(&!7=$%4P9J3tDc*N4)NSGY3Ma(y^lS7mH4T_LtlUYaN<{?opJgW z$tP{-ps)51tNp28&Ko-DTQTWC-=!woS<}N0$1X0~29N%_XVU1e6PG!9fEH`IMg>0dklT>sbp@fzF0X8fR!KmS)G{p${U-)(X8hI)Ug zdv-XE?tj#y)<^_3A2{{yTk2At(dYSzGK?02;P>Rj*|+|DVDSC!wb6M4 z#f9SD@?FF&=c$h69-NnL`+*<+>``y|E(9aLMY$)k;M?AO_lLe@e*BHf*Zjc&%zwbM zx9y!Vy3c!E{_=9g(?@zBA936x|B>wDeB6v_$&ns!rJVZnAO5Q&?soZolrKFFWd7L) zyf6EUr_~nuXn&Fe`ha9r`>X#ZY+rcZ`}bxxO+NI_GhHT>pSy+*?N4-&i*`0-{>;z; zpHlj_p&n>|X_H1AROBb(*J^*7x6`_t#v`w9ob+kB2r4apcHU0(Rr3GF$+zC9XJkkp z%-ebAZnjAuckU+qrFjFr=SrUu&*=nj_+d^y{=8l0ccEY4hau_m#QQdZAD%avi~ha# zaA+AE5{doaS3l&b|5$nv{ziM~P~NX8@CncV><0?JeflD0p9AMGzk1oDf4%2}8@ssj z%gY5%AHO{e$bUkp=TYLS(0;4OZz$(AKfB~{yI=97#d(`n4?Q<8{rkPD{p0U(D)c~m zkQ}4~7OUDrGa_$wduW?{)NhgLDxum#-_W5whz@d5-(%%p9oh$chWM1hqdjCz8gWpg zp9;jsw})VT@`uqlkYDA0x)Ew6;6Hswd?FtvZ$IQU2VMLAN1m;G^*7pw@xs4<=Ll zc1dLSep$`Q3BT+4KJ)K!-o87&p|Sn$$PfIrjpQI5kgSUD>NTN%&O5*Gg$F%W`HJu3IC1^S!v9^^I^;z+As_x|QlBoN-sjThybCMm zNXj|*xUao!r^|N#o-gMWl=GFXr`_<(ojQjjAN43XNXOM8I><$RHJINubifbEuW#_E$B{{+9?PVg5+7fW%iHO>t$V2SoV+x5zX#en zgkJW!E&9xL&L5}0;A_8+dv5oi5FK}xNT0vn^-ER;{MmntyT4QTocT@#{?z=v=6|Jc zk9_675!3emF8D9~2Pb##(f6oN>iV#L;n%E5!>+*yB1D@W}S8`H+aQ^Z4o#lx4A>f!=2QBVKaA+HdLP}`z?aCU?BS=ZpPIoVzM3Yzc+QfpLwsDjh2EM+%bo1vS?yqSbNIXmoz9g`aK2jo z=0@{>nMmBM?&q?94E+N+ns?Q_xca%Gp$q)8+`RRj~ zp?^T+@9MQ=EEfF$(Ey~4%iKFojBAD^(zzYhM&_DDjXmHGV}oxc>{BwqmN6a3TP z3s@vQ5~yFz=W0G);UUh;#koaVtrXP*mkek`(_ ze@=Gp;nDS~>`h_(z`h~NRe0XDf{)H?u71?{ZN+}WC(i!lM;yKGIYfJj^LN|u zfjpgenEzN*-oVhs$s2IptjuzfH@-A_pJMXn(0<6%J&1EpUe2Q%GhgSaci-*w8xlfZ zoL=dVJG$g29h6=*Pp^(APv>{%c+a5xJ~VW3@=By%wf^YIOWhLngU)%^eTI^kH*~>s zYOCmA2cA=9<~Ix-@Kfs9^6+)yyB@wo{J_IcSnp#GUn73z;j_di{~Fo{eI{%_84q70 zKJVcZ#FspLpZ!eL!`Fy!c=!bIZ4Wf&l*=n>aC z@4nBt({p>H_3O%K9KTiZ{Je_y1bMZBPt$TDjPcy-D(52T#Q(-S^OM>W$rk`|6a3TP3s@&T5{MU_=i2(5vs2@eax&a^gK>gC4s6{a%m<$u z%a=}beDu7Udh&A2A9{3lybOL_<@0=9@teFnY){b3ALkC2qk2_XKKc2meT{!c`S|0` zd6Z#((a-_kBmc68FA!hz@M+?k9=^Q2>nA!MzRUXQd-y!@BM+Y>^Tek;e248L=i$r57d`xx{Z7ThkJxY5J$#4sEe~HNzU$$0#1A}tlK8QQAF!XF z89c_x3D$d_`5nS6^-L~@{z1G9NIxOmY`-vK`&<>D-Z;7L$!oD(k5J>}jz?Genv35W zq4cujbQ7FZ3*o~JWMGkYw$sTwrYG@F!_sqmi)Vf(#MWZ(T;a&K55M^1SHleySwfL&oI8 z4ldgSlZK_kO+H*V~=p zcsjvx5uRJndd`OT|-*?3amw)~(zM8fiM^KIpKN-Jk^M7{%wiQPlE9hc;IKR zN9(+kXoaC{9Z=M?c|Z_tAsb>6Mc zbC~jf{@CDs0CD8L#|*eGEjrrQrgL7>w{6J>JNKEl_qF-` z4h}Q*PW$O3f9$wGe&A_+UgyGuH|F}I^k^SWdQ7E9ocFg0FMWi;%P|$6`#z>~Z8{ev zyuwT7dC-G>-TVJ0+lJ-WxiZ8t4c6>-*6i;>ixBhXOprx9Wz{(ix`QJ&)(U2PT&b+ab;8 z^qnj5%UXC*^~pVd=f-`_dLDY|`_eh`6Q7oa2Yb8n#vcvz2A%2kUamun&e)<8WgmT~ zI)7$B5B%Kstf@DJ?Nj1>f5+ihbnvFvd5Qme-?NI8Cu7ww$mPCg^&NiN7ohzEvctr} zL%S|K)E~4T$u}GQvP=bU@wvPMuM%Ez;0eO34!lP{G#q%5@U{aVv!3)Ec#rU*18)*O zao`2Q6UztwgT5KU(++&Z_A%?gyMz}Uc!Th=11}R^bKp6`n-<*j$1)u&9~Gx*KG(PK z5clqVlbx(-Gp`=U3ee+s~?8ar+l4@UEAhe)aisb~}_KZp8Lx^hxa27Nnie=S$%xSn@*bc*1g{>`&Qdd-un~t1*SF~ zpBVYao%_dS&nW(Od%EwkhRSEZzwvda9)10($k}oEb#E#YzgI7M>4FOnIg0z%y!lGX zGh`}$_WP5~XFu{;_LAkdUH|40=Qo1+kF&^U_0fTee{PfA89dScx#s|-56b=cPcr_Q zN{$lqhEC9KA3!;Ne&BbOdusBjKd4;s{|(Bq+Dms`a?l;`{R+zc__ydGFa1&O`DDg> z&sg}Y1pb6R?t4VSD);LJpX)P~K2sK+UoS-8=U`9$U{~*-|5KV>HLxe@UER4~D#7v+Q#}VF(5FWDT|pa2HcP ze}32DCq5`gTx9sX-m7#^OrCHbDo}Ld|E%2Xh7ww<@`KCWR_~v3|8|j@RzV17jOJ41>J$}bc zFTMJLn}07lb@Ba%@zY#%Hp7G7@2unj=M;YY#k24?>iskw=A|dfy_lGBZ_|W)mBv>$ z`YW##&!c_NeKv}(B=J!W{|!j5PdyZu1q%=DgYfVi+JOqon-(76ZPIHy@DkxY2c9B) z=)gPl_r!sh2~VsM_#N#`+RCF|4p}d=gwNK_s9)B3dG*Vu{@~>&qx$8_CgFa$Li(y- zva{^e<@fH~etF=?+hTsq)TRSk_<8<}HP$x##m~Oq1?9!v!{u|`myur6*fGZxd=M9@ zH4Pp07kUpbS$Lk^7u2o1=l^9UDKie~IPePLJqr%M4XwOCp5k`_Cxl1Y0qu0$`TmjS z8D$syIeXl&CEv4J$1d9K@Sh&>g0X8bZrF+MS*7t2=Y06o7e}&3F=gyjWvcnlL_K)V zwfSsCKAm4YbH-odZ@u5;vkUqB`j@>|ZeD(B`a3(~1AI@18U0m!tsw4Ezuk4mq*V?- z_9*X&sq8dm;h}yD4}4LN3oNf%cz`!ar*6UF$Cj0cA2Y=35z?yvWD!SI($W0C^s~ReY}46*bXuSLQ2f6)ej$&n7bo*XM|sJIJp870TBWkx zi2Nr^fsgoi@576~Bk;2y|HPkOkD$G$EIdE{ExLaEv%G5I`SDM@x&to|-m>7R7hNll zI2w`vfbi&g;mzYY_k*Y%o-Iyv56Bm2u+MGw+d~gHqp^~)Q_#L`&hqU1%l>gd>2sIL zj$MbJ_@Eqi%&ueXT4XADs?3XziCA?x%9S7j41vJMO*glzBTpa)v4Q z&dL8dTt8endgM29Bg6;gu;WmAq>Vi^Zfo`Xa9O5o=03v^YQYC1L>)>72-E@-l}7jL+%puHKwxTz`}$7g$Fr&|Fb-` ze%Sw6!ZQ{ee$H8W__4E;ho8C{reG0N?=JR1Z?I&>eCu9x@_LoH2Tlcm?F7%J?eE-x2LA?0# zkZ<4F-%xPywBNwp-;mok82|cq;Qj#ZZ;%~^&VC8)Cvf*K*z4rbPw!w#weIiUN9)dm zCEpd+Q~MG$4wBuo4xaWUXq*#0&YwB%u5i6y@u2+%)8mfcn)7;XhoANfXdi_5Rp<}U zi?TzB`%Fe$uLmCdJ#|HRA4lrljva{a?t{o#cv1XPd~U9N1$B!K;z9cg-2D(82T%J7 zV&oIGuK@J4&hPG1u=fK*$*+A8?tKAn+~hY5+pEoats3_`C~hhap3d=WK233N?mSK>Vdm9v9(1pHk6G8;Miao$JsYT{RL@N~{y^Jc=c=jWs3s!^WG zHKZ*|UG^~|+vEfcnD z{9L1N`W%yrU)#cq;-_=fbG2_1iw^YDdG@BmFST)4E}d7`xqh`b`E$eVxXz=esfXqb za@PH`QS$5l@VVNhjw6@OqmRf>_8MAvh-Y^nQ;z4!;TPCJ=gi%6{pt4vc8HQ&=ejej zck;8lKdEfd0Y9Bb*ZF_R-LUYY`03n!kLSt7&yB00MF;$JZr!~nAil}c_0xIvx!Q-k zMF;$JZr!~npkm=g>8JDRbJhEi^rJ9yLQoq66~^>ygzsq?8Bo|9L7 zZCUj?O8(mG97mMi7nWb=okz|&{RD{lK&~i$ zI`=$Rz0O&5z)$Cvb?#gI$`)P}zX9W+%=5Ri)$5K$2mDgPr+vh4=-}yGug-rf?i;rR z{VV9Td2ZJ|cRjN9{Q^(taYhm$gOj^ah`V+zm|m; z#ZTuk-E*RDy%<|`z)$CUyAHqP=1bRaq;tG;^mj#z4*2ODu+BM4znX=I`3m8|-@D$;F2i|6TH*(-vwS!xP^-U6;x9C(iKu>+409{)ht4t0(XQx3dD_>=?B5}tS9eU7I~4!lTs)qzhD z-f-Xv!rKnK$@i9?1FsN1bl`EqCl0*J_rSyl!**y8o_64A!m|!MMtH%25BOeQcHkw# zYYu$E`HZFm?-Sl};5EYg4!lVC$bpYF5A~t2zCFT|4!lWt#(`G|&pGe};Y9~N;{0C4 zfp-b7TX3&mh;~gK@Y`XC2b{&5h6Pa{lMPd7tRSvqt}=&6nA9 zv@V+4w6MdD$6o%R=;TR9^I#fR+w*QV9j%L=aMipwefgtr`U&WG_May@%1ck=JsZxL zNA5^|rah*>$M{0$S!Mr$RSr8gnAd!o{1)FT6c-DH2fFAV(=5+hcz~Blujs(jgjXE+ zkbbONaKvHD$|DZT#Oo3sy}sb>b9L4OG`~Mr96s!yK#0Ze{o={{UUzT9zkeD2N`Khc zLF>%b{w)OP>p0Te}-^VGfZQ7wa(+<-iQ!s^H8y`3FiEfwt#!LkVKH|W> zUmSMMY-jW@GM(-F&aF;(KStp$Gry*KX!G&w5%(({&HYNp{Qcig9=qxT{%zqX?~&i% zAei^dRsZp&1K#|bZSXhh#fasdu4(sVf45&2otN>T_gnXtXE(XJdFc)K8}(ImkcYk1 zE-RJX`CL$s&_3sH4X>XSt#ZhhVZL^okx%xhS$L?o!UKQQ&lb!379QYn=7$y>{+d{M z_^Uy?B(^v5M%7!y#n9c?mbuyQZ|3sXS^Un?_WS+kvQvJ#}D z(6OF_J*T+7U0cuiO@4rU`bFte6uw0dc=EAQ>8(`r+%3*`g9q#|d3Pr?9?O0-Y=<=Q zwVxr+c&S);{~!Jp?vI#_f7hZ5KWN{D_AQA2#KD^)UF}OS8>-*T)sn#p5N~9-Uz)1if>})KtAwQd#_aWK>GpY zhuWRt`cSawfS>k-=zUS`Ox3~Dz7M^hNv`GwL3@aL)8lg^2i_!nY|#aNhWYp|fqsB@ zXqS`&&k{c6z>|dM9e8YgBVWmZHyCGC2cAqD{DuWby_esTe6DSkNBN`Adfc<{U~k<6 zAp5EP9a(r@f3YBu5A1>dW6H{-ok@~@j&Q}hQurU^z2TosKdF6gy1(qGRnPpPjVt`F zgI^{6>MuW=RIC9PKeXfZWy0gNHu3Y^A7}G`+-iT58yY+7z1UDR{{v6^*@|=Esl9D2 z1<#XVM*EQXn6d8^(;`zy;PYoYp4w>Xa;hCI&4JhEezf*d@S^1GP_7}<_^v@*_~ZF2 z!{d4R_s~<8-@vv#^a8%_UDEioNP15`wDQ|r|3i1D#x9^6CAZpL?VE7>r}nSH z?b6873w+&nUwS1!9_WvH>3%PJWc5Q!ldH!5Pwh1HK)>nARkip*F1KHhTx|<4O0G=q z_1UXIx!nHLl`Hv)zz&eB;q)7lD`(-MT`e(hf0rKey7%VQt><7z#fH)e^=(;rkfXxy zr-;Ao)wA%>zKyLsbyz8X)zg~9_}_`gQ{HdDYoyja)DL+>Q> z1E$gMv0nRoznLfP_e{GjKR@%9kH6yD%J0AXVf;kF=+Ql8<)>8_ArpSEYi-MLf1D+L z^8Kd$v3bDn>c8|JAbEyc1nm{#%WY?~^b-8rmpm3-PvU42J{FI`{n{nYs$;#})8 z`cC6(43hB!Pi1$yyyJf#&8s)_#|}O9H}D(kMR^}%AFW?Z_Y;Hz5B-h!cq`Zb?|{?J zd+p(WerGLYym~WFbdZN#rN7cih~CU~mH4NE`VYAV#4rBX)En6$ZQ*%*7YYx2(Qf5f zUbgT6Z%a=L?mZuCSb5ZwEb-ceNB3*qIm%&pK2LU&eWf?#^80Jfr=PPnAhFo7$<-hF z$3-9f1pY>O^3z8DE!fHROP|>2>zh6JYn5w#?IaSuVZF{CYwoxFuTTzqP4W2xQ^`}h zB;4N%56{6a72-FU0uH;htvu{9qCI+q&uSOv{tw-!F_&G=&w+C+_RalYykdpR|Mf5Y z4ZCED#xA=7;QdxvwjaOmFU3FLZ|I$8x%R<}pL_p_=99n=HSQC{*P@40TqdpX@1i|uRlOfUsL z>aXTugqO0)A@`7SYrp-p{uUnUiSR%delN4UVc`MZA-$FZFB9Ii;E0ofl}DV!h&LuY zI!=P~h`L8h^?S=5-t;l)3R&^<@-y0#{0_l*3H?v=iEw>Pf5zCez|^J*IW_JmA8-0Y z^}B|n`5$0F zUF-Z_l)rL3x8<%Mx&CS&6!uq~&$;K;1`b}2c_z|TFm zmOeNvx6aAA=hpHTUKBr_Pt zF~x&@A3fx9??=l1H;4nsrSoPwN2Yiwd^T(^oi}sOknyLQl0Yy5c1()wCF%yjdPSH ziLY~0lH08>Ba06FrgL#R?KbJdrEMF;$JzRo@GR<-aj4sJ5vx*%wO z0nZTLbMU*=Yv{l$gijoJg7Cy)fu25J#zoqJR|wBK@C@Mv2OcN9?7)Ytr!@y&CcNpu zV}y4cc!%v--+|`{A35-p+P}lY`cBwCBprB-@Qed55}tG5Q-l{Cc!KbX10Qi5QFq{7 z!dni!L3r1JmkA#@@EqY|2R`8VD}F@S4sF6y4!lPAlmkx^o_F9ajweeFJpV=0PgNaw zmG}(@ULd^fz%zvR9C)1Yp#vZCy`u#QW#}l-8_rv=iz1X1t*GNb|)l3(tH1UC;~XV`D3i_s5Ff|Bf_ziXYkg z3FeCvSDAGWy$@@>V6(*=p65OT{PB;%_*106=?5R(UTv~?;QhF@Bs~5p5x>dzXq$(x zKi_lo{w8_S9}SOpW?SbdTX<;K#^g8GI!E%TARauKX7n>!=g3%ikhkKj!)l!)Z{fjT z6)O+9da{EBx8o;9J=#_|xs;3xx+c5T6Z}cP%`?hm@~x!Qsb|m4_e8(&IQIZ}fVAH?Q^k@cg~b z0kwW*-oKg4nM!nL;7nmA;@5B;CJ4&NpI?RPGJ z2hJbZa(jQzd0uE-FmW{7d7;=&PX9@MspE}(ZGNy*k?^_B2Nj6%CCmH`-*^Pkbox8RSr2 zCqLbvyUj~?pL4}_f4oKIT6ez3JRW=Y*@K^W=OzcFO!@rzLq{ITfpYk{P5OPNng<*+ zZ|DSaY)Qp`{*KSwy~bC*>YqOI_2BsVUOeFaeh`0gg~Hn>Yv6Cs|MSELd5^@5_OkM& zz}{#t-TAbdRSvnQm@hDuom&% zaTJaN^+U419Y4OGho&7phXpG<`q~8#&g*Usxo!LI#`1T4_$S}pr1GDRDW5;TILCd? z4a(bLDnAb_{cJhTC7(UNv+5sm+uw7QE5{xzug}jMwd9zq{e6${v-kktLz&^{Vl}WY z{Oo=YwQQBc&nf1!N{=(`LEXZGpM?j$@MoLl0}BuE3H2RWaQHcPQXm)nTq0hQ@Mu2= z?UUA>)joCSjXZAQAKHiU>f!z&Px?`D0eOpiN4HOHN8T#)J*IR|NC5aZbF>-vJV<#IsNFUX!-(C5In_QYUJ#S}$|9k1gZ*H;Ul09BQ26oi@ZQh}4 zu+9HbaZ)BeFkrX1a}RckYu%SjQDfcom%%9`+zU#Xn%qFLD?hm zc!l&@gnBi_nZ9(L*wuSU474`jg)cE~#4m6JSC@dN+pJ9hfW%5Oin z^I3oU^uGTAJ(R2ec!><(wfvFSUXwcFTc+G=R~&xggL2qsOnDQh7<;H)$uMu|1adsZ zN^#cvuG{kY`>*?x$|c9&C`Wbe#83ZN*v`K_9PNtu0N+EI(XMnt{ATtaJ*ymYSD0@w zl^sVG9@-V*fiL_SKb3ki6+F-9vKAbEE?9Z^xl4PM36E}9ym5px-jiKrf0_yGWAJ10 z(?+iCXy2oU&6f|^JTX1qlYPI=2d{bljJIv{%;RZ14|@zK&xEP?mA)ISufQI{!*j4l z@-)LY%M@_vowxGPyCr=IkJdYAPqp7i?dd!A>&!S0g!&M3_H{H#Kgv#!x6SdZJKl?( zZuEfskhf1dNy2S=0|!69z5JAEpS7<`arD&Rt~q*U`#*ota36y&ygccjxW~l{)P@@B zhJM$!iDb3t@di*$Tf}R{o&~{V_vLH{M1pV{To{LfStRKgvT>&md9(x zZnk}3KkbjwxntSKl|wdC+WfS!PlWmp)_gP!4_cywWP^bSyfEbDejT z{ip3^;d$}9Aoi6Y9uUuIEAQ(^{3*hvzf#DB_!z$s-p{Rl-BI6B1-`p4y-fOZ?MqjG z-6VeZvg=z>@#MY__lbY;g%@svc(Ub(p4t!R>H+=qgZ&kYO0_RNwZHL`_N8aO8rT(a z)juFS9*VKNz|@tePWW8=wB7IWDgL6`1+<@uw;8$KMy0;I(s$o_{_(&2I)01nV@IV*s?G($479QYL z(knagDZ*Eiu#^=NBmg@a%aiH^@aKSeo?+U84FUN!&fZBdT+5Fg|{lo{itQHbBn@zTU9_x;a&kE!gKJk#;N^_=g2 zmKQBN-~YrbTX6WfX651MG5y;lJlfCRe&uhO?>?w~RT|aKg09|6+~;5~{i5s^KP%AJ zACLbf9A5*cy(v;`*@+sB>yW09_esc4x zpWb`;%SX$Q6MVFO+~RYumru{)gSgiEc!B$hquOKGMdJ#k+MliUJjjK1wEtrG9Qo8Y z0=>Xb`>ypJ7|C69@TRyvnd7>h@Oq_S+yi=Af7Lz!;Ux|Z@S^1RVE%8$x~p?<-o%kh z>#o`luKN;FX9s$serK7t&vgUdC%uw`-y*!~z^jBe9C(88wgvaciIjg#KliNiC_4-o zr$Y-5c5NPO>Ywz}I4E{bpr_YfEl68=n}3b`^HzBj|19x}7G4y8jZ>=@9{9Jcyv;vF zx_zrWihq~w$DV}ky&W96ZDnfX3bR|m)jxr)wr z2sIATc*TAW?XkY|cM=O$+u~UJm z_>IpB=G#1d777o~`Faz-$rNzt-L~@3JI;KMY4kY3+t1*P&vfp$%=5pt-k=*h-^e{z zf1S7|JPy$M?QHhcJ((x6!~W0HyYHI)>0bW$-nOUi^Zes|dn~_q=?DIN80=Z2TrH+* z_sc&B>3R&5Zh+X$0+o zSN~_Mb7!q`$UUaK3BqNkqJ@Vz5FYp<4yr6~S$Kf=NUvkT5g&ak4?h-&HzGVbK7#Yi z{WDCx)q3?=KMvKC1yNdA)e@`dUqTd%x2gHN=GnbEig%t5F*^~}% zGwpKx!XWO^p4M***Z%?eXNYIp#E(b9M?W|8>~hHfySaKP9>4OQE8|giaQ8>F$!GO1 z{Q6I>9YEiW$06~TTrxWQe~HKHkxP%qrgJVo@oi(rEK}PKetY8Bwf#`gzM(zQ`$nDX z&x(^a>A{w0C;H5fPY9kzJ2A2F;Fl`%iSHP>qVH>+IZvnezPaY`W;`*gR z{HS{pAh*V+bG^?h29#=^&b?1zKz^_v;=7Uzw<9f;Uu5iL`wj9;5kA*EUF$dDdZT%T z+4@cG+d7#0ww5XV>aUA_+WHjawEMF!@WpY3ZJsQbV(0(Jl+T~vbNGo5$`Map$~~0) z`mX53L45}w$#Dqf*mjLgMuoka|1f-l@zAl9V~bZezIV_2H@*zzUfj(SALKpT&FEKa zA$~LGXBt*HWY zrg_6$#k3QztajvA)V4w<{Cv9HzvMn=FwFn3o1RtLq8xqF2PWb-?fAVSJf?R1qTOjd z7>>&v?`Hu$*jw*oYIkJs^d(_C=9stVNnppag$I2nl%q!Y>uq-us~UcDwL5xW>5~3G zw)yg^QT>P8?u?25qut)IJK7A}PLNyePV({_{rg?j{=!cB!B1*$l&akso@C-c>jU}k z2KIyB#(Rg`ofOL}OlQbL_|n^*`HKoWn0qLzx0?P}?|pyT>FAvlOOoG?NB245AcdZi zN9ok1VST#WhV_ZFyvS6~fgbo)32%Ja*vT#j4u0szwNFm>u4~=&@9DG8b@hQ=r#27E zF(4nchc+L-Jvhbich^m)E(`R7ym999Ol>+wT2mj}y>R`C-(%#7;_tWXY!9|N!BF{J zV*f*y9Q5Pq`S1?;Y5nFu-+kuQ{#uzAfsOh)V7d0sYuq~KydUtuM|8A)^TYJrr!Kr` z<1Iud^*y7n_QQ)#cwb3CN9#9#Jm{WdzP#FD&x%fobhN)+^NwSyow4Ov3lDm~ubj5( z%O_lO(8c&0dbLSM=l;ihZ^^D~`~^Il&e{NYzu&*{(p!I-TYLI_azZ*f&)+?=W-6bPx}@f zc#ZIi1J4p(ci&}gXTH5W2e^r-WxWFJ$uS|@C)Kr^HVFZ{Dfyt z-#K&lZtp_5-#$>D2~+WFYy9WoAr1zXKF~Y)Lt}?5Q_zDy@>U*txA$BtygUe&yTOOOncuWe71Tubn3h8Hd}mY-dFp^_F6E0_5AZzp0WRY7dmpc z{mSe8ZQ+NLus8gaxzgA(&vZJztouX|U*dBX=_Hmve6Ka$v(CDpW5=;BpE_cj`XeZj;a66&)YBoRWe!yp0Kfm(i@8@sOxyV27VcYjL4i-PPYya!d zoOj-7&c6emt?-LmE>+Cj6r2!^XtF^2}H6$6$%!>ElCgz5mQLkEr(^rF#EqTw&_% z^!v}%L43i_+5N-gmlVq@Ol^7mxOV2t5+?=z@!L&~clF+?_qCzL7x5Zv8#(On8NqL9 z!eIbke?FHbe71I{`$9Ng=Q=-DA-$!qyUdJ-O2WuJ*ZZ*M_xt2C+x))!J{-Ho(9iw4 zwi52;dm&LAMA~I=JuU>egb9{s`O28+Lkni#yic z%U|cT+tIJk5trR~@Tu>A$D#gv7V2lrxtCOYpa<-dz0TOJ$W-lYm3iQSkL1{fa%_Cq z=l}HNY2Wd`E@jJc2IVM@O7Hp3y+^zq&wKWoCqBq~C^P!Y_>YYoD2Lqcd90*W4!L`j zZ^Tq~oU-uXPvLUYGD_KL_jldcV_r&*JZ&{{&40 zk^CR}0nIxKe?s~nj6b^xO)hl5UZz$E*UR+v#(tf)iD#P!?4|ib#lPf9Toc5X?^|7!Y>ntBJwe1SKr*1IzSbF<9e^F^M_a|Oq=*#Zu z4LUmV0ulTl?C!3wR>*!-}qH`90j{fudh0ML=!3eBwdtheYHgTz=L1P&bVfZ<#nd6 zUpj;@eSOv2=jF^ZXx>ZhvP~E5YW!|9U%UYX^L~xVH$U~*7ru2g{`TAN8;xCb@1)i{ z-20A2=iPYF`&EB){F0CCbX^{QgHDZfbT6geo80+I(eYn|yk~F!OZl4G1}FUybkJ^h z9sQ&i%E6~kKDyUZ`%K5;@6!qN-WU&hzpq@e+QAE7`HX*R8FZ$8YV_8x;y#TS)-p69TX!k`IML5%FCY0Py3P2XDz!T{{4Z0SEe*` zld)r#X`X43X_;x2Dfqz8xwV{j%PNOG63pvfPsRDb!bAToJkUk|Ghun^XGSi;N3?Io zfj0@yIq(AEMF*ZByyC!Hv{T)I7YT1!aEuGOR^A^M5N|+u^tiw~*WjEh)qB3`iCh1* z?t2&=cG-F-zBcdbW&H1y+vBba*eKq(;NE4fecQaFU^n=w=kOCBl*3Qin~j}|Ocl3P z<_(=-{rL#WQGV;A``>m$s;Y9$cV0+2KK+I3f3wcjIsdx@h-2{qKH^Y%DvjR~_#1M& z_m?ECa=*S&z7bQ|amvC&eDy3n{P7>ls}`O={v%%9g2T@(EARW6cwNG0^Ko zcy!?h^@B>~kGlAIc<_h&eez-uor|nsI@Q3iA7wkS_d7>NmAMhOEDGLsN zOj&vOV?saV37^d$UB@4a7u5&p4Y^RSnopa4_b)71Ve|byvi@@`Zl!X?``s+xwDj*Y z?*Gzvrq{_jlxM(H{u&-?=!%Z`yhu9x-0;R@fA#B)iz*kNdsu$*-#X*NmVf04l*6Cm zgS>|_qh1wn3+x(IugX?A{Fq`s%T#u%TX^uJ@W2=TYO{P`;Q>CO{v!(xKgNC@$OS*v zh?gWh+K=A*#C4`$?(b&eUhjQNHazKLiebovAI6bc;tMZN`di()?W0lS)Rco?CH`vr zzWg(Hoa)CP*DH1YRdN{#%>VF05XyXdj~FnBqE{?x)i^6A(tc#GLOa)X5*^;H&c`I;SYUT?-F!Fl0VG2;>30M0os; zARYiO|IE~rlmjmojsK@CxF_fIdEMSk=DEC84!so{N_AehWa0Vk*hywwBR%xqT(j`J z_+8Kr=VJpakGPnkUL(TgFQu>_;#21VUhntNG*2M>)Sbp|vwaV(Y#0kOXE$e^a1OHs>&nSnV3%@XSt1wmjoIf|v6Ld8G+M9gFUwg}zuWY-M-@V#= z4kn*{hX-!^u_rHo5_~*+%o88vJ>6%t&#}9LxQ}X|6IMCo?o!?%Q?<_-3(w=bPt3`~H5(3J=G9Z@?a@p0Qt+spc~;hzc#{;;sg9BKlaGq(3^SB(7-B(+%@J~Ol7Bug$F+h4|L(LP~Q@AtfIwL@#m-Dm6(?1$Ko^(1-3jv{=e2|awb34Ru<~()RDu>)<=Icyl$DxG>KMN0h;pf;rM$a@;!E=0W%7Vks zc`FY;cjRBfqx=l{w4SK*sG5(NSo0si)A?7O`_w#>eIEhrrSXkY59a@LZq@z1kb4in zIHbqSagF$4RKJXJZ+}a{H*WIAfAN>LE(o!@h40Hhu-n~!g?23 zo+3OdZlQO|xqnXeYBs&K-{T+}p?8h)3?4V*OX=OR z;bvlb+D9G4!Op%)15{x*&%D; z!5_i{U-+ZQ@|uO`*B8=jSaA5MZRHW41>*GxkMa}b8(z%ue$%AW>rQtE^%QtbmUo$| zKMc=r%$yg>zhd-;UZ7LF#PF#y)%Ymi5A5pcIbY}9N0uDWzf8PF7(bR~zHPzr-r;^1 zxM!6^p44}ZJXxi@PtcxMx8>>059|VYn#`x~56K^kF`u>IkjMQ_aKS1^yy^W%>5%f4 zEj-9w;r;oFC;72%;dybfpkw7BZ;bSY4!qkldW|hOj`pR-eto8j zi_T*P4!=k0^*vKwIwHVBeTomvIuxs?_ud%hSH8^P*O@9_>ki(C<#F1dST#S z=-1@)U8aiH*aLxFh!1^lt^S7KdDuHeyj&PRHlVyk3mz4(6{{Tbl)q2?nMyA^USUUf zem1)}kPCD&JQtj2D!m34KU=Q}@!(JBH6dQ=!H^wdZNjH4IP`MkK5vyr#YdfVN){gE zcH>_0P_yt5_iZZ=dE2!2z=3B8A6an7+kcapXHeY7ejDfsIa;zCQ~6=8xF7xS^~HVB z;a6;#=c-H<_caG^#PT@#NG?0>VUIqaD}6s`pQGY$;?S>LZsce%6@5GY;7`?GrL`-} zbBLd)_$)jWw(k`23rrQC6$=mXsqgDeoO;(FUN?*%%P>E%;8F28w#uQ8+GC{&md76s z%k9Re{Fb)x5TAJ~4}Y|1=ZXWLBD`k7A#d{o;rMJ?<%rMtmB!v_rt;HV@frV-d2X(D zIW`FE-6Nk7Q^jZ6!K;yei>c(Y<1;Eg@>d1%1N~ymrH`%ph;URwNRv!A~C~wDs4;U9c z3l4dEZw<%K&?<)<{kF09n5q03`)#-%sa<36T1=z-3H`l){!eN3+Q6St{w_Td*cb9- ziC<(Yf7dKL_*>tn8(4C}J}u()!}zf*^CJr$TL8TnI8rMKMPcY4(w;^-Ljs8-c{y%4t$FFp#_KDZa+P-${~l^Kcz{QCmsvi$884{ zPZrbuS>=$I(}mOL#Zv6=lWbQztREA`f7f~* zao3&YyJABN4|=2?5A^r+Sf%y7{VbYe${mXJKB77j_8?P_u23t*Kg2p`K&`eD_;4D!aeDmZ#U)h z=MNpdq>toil7H8cW5~StXkKO?@;N8<+3goy^u`(U)9bOkbmHw(yPw`W6VH2onI}HV zOMm1Mr>aj%OHUd*RG0z}?TP!n*P2xhyQZ1XF_m507M>^1Lg9ff>Rq4Z6AKUU81wOA z;1|Fvv`@-{BmSnWJmN1-ygcDi^AL!?*suS8^JH3=e};jX+hM1Z>4$it+K4Ux*S6$?z592C?OkR0fT^Ct!{9q1e6I5s+83(( z1#~~nZ1)Se_tWHmZ|wT;t4FWtuIFPt);)hwCH@0P-*+3@dRuPq?-}jC&e@dKHtlEP zNt4cYU((P$FHC+zrZzv=DfP6Ge`)t60Z;SwsmDzJrG1UQv-ltIv~Qr@GkDrZ>Edaf zKTCS!J%jOqa6wP=YIWji+#(#Lz|%dFZQ^NO-^PP|xm-8BUom-iL*?`@Twy zH?*%Z%ktzO!+MCX(u`H^w>uoKh_C8%-oo?RlLh5)KGv}E@K5(CW9Js(;%EEEujjvT z>iPYz?;OubCmBk&{XUl3;nn%m`xz5|GWu>thUY%=rcIAseCo--w)_1%Dag++>;HD| zV-_zl<=(uMBaho3XGlNKRPAz^dGV1Pn^TUhFMM&cX1o14m1`aGF3R!5pMLw=`v=e5 zhOB4bdE$e-M`A{MISKKbInN(|Ch)uOSK<$ts^3jpcz%Ck(M6o)SYEd90I!RV1xG*A zu=0q5A^qPbJi4Fp)@Pk{f7w;`rx{_682qSp+JjiZ-~H4X8$W*9ug+1q?0XIe*zMn4 zdE3WxYpjEE*dsYI_L*WTe(mE;+yW2w5FYZ-yFmOZQ{u(yRvvnfsBeq#+4Sz+6psHq zzjr#D-pwtI+}h87U2mcEXynO$&ylUYA-XOiY z1J4lNvf!vET`TX`6UNDa@aTA%zo`GT@uT`X)#KT|-_a(%@Dk4%JIwa|j=F=NC4SWR zJJ5a?2I2TE6MwevY&2Ou*LNtiuTA3#&F@^g-I_m`_9>j={V?v*zBb`c$mf0MKKdWM zvlwi%U#ziGxF1eGZ|qY1qp`2e1NCaQeQh1$gEr!zMmjUjzYz{R_`AS-kEzWMIQYT7 zP3N3z@ZAP}>YKj9u$Cba`{(nYeg5M9PB$Y9Ju-hWdg^?>VeZI-k4m z)#Sn>=6z3eDx{plGEdyiT8+HzN&0y?PwqNBXzL*CPE#(U?G ze8)_IhxSU}XP>sm3r>9}zV1Pi9n%(`U*9dd@Mn(YWed-*@5HM*@I2uS3y%8Uw({_Q zjCei5qwBkO57f`X^-KNKZ2s3d=jSegWn!^sk68KZ@7yZS@9r(LOy)&nm-o?75BzZ3 zmD4wDcP(%cKk7Gc2f+KCwbH>aU${^4_xKy}ljrkgrjn<+QZSzkI|>ia!CrOZcbEbW zyY#HQZx`l=OlPx;yWc``%w`wut2lsq|Elr5>yJM8SJUUab7Nzdyt6-}c4`pM&`WsI ztHkH(Or=-T%0sUt^BtzM>D6-j-SX=k59pj*X1}c;J^$J>4}=`>SL!9Bm+p%aJ$v7k z-B0VB+asg&1MBTyFMbHG+2W+)v?A#!ynn*I=P>nhpuZniq%%dhO$W5_!+0ZmOSr$8>)w+x z=`DTU&D+Q2oCBFFUe%ASv!RjgmdjSXqWO`G{8I3uFF6t|s&PE`jVgw(t<|!UJE#b>g4YhpFHdK9{rLi1(tE zNBs0??+W3w#rxFrCVn+ftTbxA7~^*L`*Cg3pX)uOUCOmm+?2O5aO z2JyR00Y|*`tvvKjGe2S)9dF)xl5_8|>ceb$Yu;#c?(bjz?Ux<8%`z)3h8(uu+i`#Y z-T(gL%Rk}=j|MLGbdY74spSvz7K3kB_D(76)z2qEopN-9Dd-5s&>!D>n^Up)3 z+oznPm-LYw9r7PIa!i;99{5O(4^obYN1Lts+g&#Qw#qf$-;r{B;>u7hdZu6kau@H~GlsD$&erj>{Pa?f(UmT-ov zVZ{IaaS-1VbS_u#2^*|9yd~;AVf4Z9d%}qHRo`qrh_~#YjU4WKLT;X|w>MA0e37Y5 zM?%}}-dy7(J+HK3@k6^8bM9Hx_^%tmAAE;|&(-dYZwT$?H2sOMcP551SpSu66pMCRgJFiN8=Vkdk@*c{J_PA%2N43WTs~mE*nAiK6>@czL&>jm9 zeBqDe0;5lsso+&Um$%^XQ_0H1PYL2x36J*E{6(E3O?#vItntjXt%vSYT>x+VBJHtx z5LfWKd+&LN{6|b}nvhfXnU#+>>tK3cG91nSz*E05yxic)zcwD^QyZjoY9Zr-De&R9 z($?X2slR{F&%$rRGmKrdZXmm~Ejqx9pF{h7!=$QjgVO@L0B>@hDIc91#%sQ0@{-Fv z2Uq`nP!2lP^G&`;dXg)*tkDy6fHxvulBw`U-w4a4eceq5uW)u4uXcgq8*i9Y^m-0n z?pvmOKs?!_af^XVzT|}_-y&W4v${C!hXL_Qq^tT5FZoK&cdZiN zF?bUPFTQ-3UXOSk(iOepf5UocpLB-!!fQJ83OpY;a_|y~FkhWN>s(~`h+fsgL;H}6 z8-Mp4c#7~cQ`j5$lSKx<=D_=eHywD3@Qwqo65e;<1;R%TJVSWw4MBWDo;cx22R>vR zXB>Ek@SFp$6JB)SCBiEXJVkijf#*sl?ph8!MR?bNPYyEp0|#CseC)uBgvZ|)w!?(& zNy>pIh(G1PM+X|dc?aGlyyUg&jn;v-8c6T1JlYd{F7kBf-2l&WKKjghf zW{ls`%NxC?m;w*uH+P;cXO%;r5%q`@F1wX2JdgiE;ejstr8>(y79QYT((5_!0^vgo z?$M1+tUThcM?WSKMxW^MxEI&X_q*~(+~mLSD=uhOi0j$G+Xr!o@z1GW^g*#(6BllJ z;gat?uks4{aoRL?;Ptj~Y(0gp< zp?8k?_zFwcJLP;oTI0sq^lsc@V(Yy=%kTKvnuG2B`~LMIC;VNaJT;~ocgMaOuIJ*jFX^mt)JpI9z~r$s z=-7NVVEM)IA071d&D#F_s}~3J#0U7E3ue4WC*ET0V(87B*GyUEkh@QL$4q6Xtc8a- z6&~oqUqzPJEIhzlq|>nAh~KuAhaacJkMP;*ZT5dWccb{s9KK!keaGxwHTDShH{Hni z{dRwk@2<7~{kxzX_Q#U8d1`d;1w* zdj0FDpsW7heGYQy7Zoq*m4bNj=NW$Q^#7DIPdu8P{p4SvCb!;fVv550#k z7`z(c(o42RigBFwv1%vYJ(^liDi&xPYi2fj&>K%%XZJIXH09noN{65Lpd9sjM0w*$qo3+^nt4NKnPnu$ zZz;!4$2_u2wX*UrRIc%!&h_oI#qEp#bitD=q1?0AJn=!^6Lm)W+z#=Zx!`}}pYv88e(um-CBmcIDeu0dd;WiZR{wWA z`?oKibKjB2Z1RgK$Y=X`8^C^f%ytk`MGD| z!Oy}2U-)^%^2FN${Q%Dpp0eQZ^OTi`pPRH(p72@y?Cjqv{>{u6%l@pE5X<v=xV*8a%p(nA{?ZsC+fqL>ia1zOHO|t!uftmh2?#wcD#ZA^g2e>@Sh%kTLOT; zo>Q7$Be0ie#|6?Oc0yop_(k_z)_E>d^D*V{^RXK9_IfkspR&stx$-P;ThBp$t+%`1 z#j(Wq>Vs>uX0*Oj-!SuXpaXriUZ3QC0qI)|KOd_wpDhRW zg1)hY(RYgFP3t*d56*wgrLWEnFHK+HeqS*B-R~B;c42c53H{$da;1!2(o9hZI|@&! z&ijrkhF^;N-GOh%Pt~FWd+NNh>b30Iw(wAod(3BYK|ANi&$}5vEFW9XMakKtzdO_~ zzET$ln`U{Hso>xPc{+qIeV^z2MeP?%|08*ozTW+{iM5TKbJ<p>@Jy+LT=GlS|fdwL%!x;!sF%96XrdvO*}mZeDLiPzO?si&`m!U zrmJ!9Y~wTS3*B>BaPrQHC6}Ce)A*9#;ct5!e(FL%VzDP~x+J#v(Tcx680|-49b>l& zQ}K&&9S6@~oFY8r(Y`f^-(^a?Sl`M+?=_*`Zf{U89$KzAa;|cSA4XNv|@WYcQ2wEh`VbQp|Um&Zbx2`L4R&2WHbt?=xqx zk{*%&<<H9k%lH21p-*i7YQAmCz4ek`hT}(kP!7AK*E4p>F_oQ5%o{qv zd)3#;=bouUPuSm~R0O{7`SJ z&itn2ll}d`H0Zt`b+6EEEO^Ha$9L}DK09Oo`gd5q$7#1`UfH?fe=ZL5a7~Aw_<#lM zl~~`{FT+&wthpS;WG5|*bn`uo9~{rK7$;}nY4p!C z1s?3?u8S3|a_AFdKE+gat66x6GvR?Q;;F^*zJ&+)fOZ)=@G{{O3y%0pY+%Q|H$Ta^ zOA|g@J5%}}`;CvY->4mT`U4v*Zp>I8I+6XxKeu@NOUW00_%G-SJJl&qo2lB7{IS7! z7j_b!?9?azgel>F^UDl*2AH%G+WpyYwvmY&lLRpAX-C#>(qG(D3bR zx33>#`IcY(+LlX}x%Ow^6|Hi}onSu0RCcUdc<`t2 zz!&k|WO>iR1AIh%2NoQD9$R^|uLa`8H#G7_``J5R#(mYgpG5nr4_W@0HS}%_nean< zTv5mX{JYNnUfDB>Km4tIw?~s; zZ}GNY-t60hl|j#r2aR_&Tla7KA74BBKvV9`n>+l(2j%c@Y9nLcEK|j0k$FQWkmK`| zpPwo9+G9y@zf< z`ma9v{^Rs+3LWsn`?mW&9N*aJ{gaFTn?ut~H~ILmH=FC}dr0-3t9$6i|1@zv+dXuh zJ;L>7iu_7UZGNy*i}0o0Lx=j1aOMFOe~MF^F5+GL_|DFIrc-i*~=@ zO1&Ij=L$x zCoaGL-W@i)nex; z3y4r%@cq9~II8 zKg3O)`R3<>=lyy7WsUz8=bi9#3uFhEuhxC^oi*_tho6tdH#hp&`(wa2&-EDb%@7ar zdb-be5AKt0&ccKKlZ8fp@mD`pvhck6v7jE#$2wLX{?3tpkMODGe?EQw5;EZjep-*y zI+X6cv+pm0{EBU*@~6H}tNU3&7w@@DS$}=I!-A zz{ixg>EP%7#c`wqj}hK?;1$vtIq;b5@qs{Y@SS?a&`(-$zyGuHh`%`Ta)c{hU?2Vb z@sqQ^O7}yl9@)>qFKU;Rs$8l3P@{dp3-RdQSJ@89YqdLE|JD6kBL~loAIbZA>q~=j zDSjlMTVDzv4D9aLQzu@;w`SqNKP~3nc*zjncktuPj~saOKgQ3o4+V1g@kn^mfyW5X zIBbUDY$d*L$GmC)%Vxb;~Mu za*9ppK7IGSZb!|&Ws(1GI@Yg39t={^^pWU=zVTSW>%Pf=5 z8o4*8(q}Kb>wZ7H?i#L-c=NjsKk)%N;ycIZW4u>a@{|Pk@F0iyY(YN1cy!@zANa|B z{!qeP#Px)6 z6#uZ%Cwjc?-7E7yo&z|7hCB0(_iU73^SSelor3qn%~`(Rvb+9ht0*+#cL-Li)gmzvW-0$&Uo} z6#jMZH%VLNkb6LS6Q()`khAdMU*Ul-{8(an-NFOBO*%~r4nKCRJp7m?UZ3#U{OGP* z={;HXRC+@$)I+Ts-OPejPP=udw|wC@DE7-`U)?Wr`=5(HKj((sA2j9OeEl5jWK&xk z`xcmLzM;ar_(+ahDaUUAz4o*>>~;TG<&xtl0Qv{M@B{L#DE0#=?W2g$KUyXP)I13lH!H>C`MZ{M@wi@N=Aa9m1ph4EZ$f z)ObIteFUDqJE8Hp@W$NNBYUy>coLW&%^cHrr0xA%QSD%M+rYlyt9@KKj(5}!mMuK^ zNqxQ20r!h3)%b6=@s>M2?^yI9hrScxj?X6+9{iKs&d6_nCj#&~@v=$61l){ z(5v@r^Bz8B!4ao9D~~v>E;Mo#30J%@eEbCClaceidDZ{f+9U0^**aFlV7kbCHH+IM{1sr;3 ztvvK@kZytSsQL-Lv(9~DYCmSvTkBKW2XNw&mH)crt#L0!9;9Z+;^YNjl=Fwa|d<6anKk7YQsos0)i%mPA_nxVb2KGihsO}zq?}@X# z$kdgmLHN@48G^2R53}M~ac|Q_TxWPsy6*9e?|k-cXYP3Kbx;v;mfFe4?cUQFTiNIb zJj9vskViaa`CN%9@nRJ#4?B;kS6%oK`oYhZ5PItad^`U3+gIpu#-R~4{nCU-zh};0)Nt-gSX!L>^@r;a?sKq@euyjiNon1Z4}Q)&>ncT-cbMuq z&;;KB;Y(XrLH}BFz6+iCUEpVw7o6{^#vTjGA-C2PlxB7@cFi+2@_73{IS(v9sUI#| zcwSsBXjpmAf6L?Vg8AiRG|;{?fh-iDV> z`$qWCTXd8b&IwSSk>eF>A`vc@Z52%{);i8v*B)~&E;O?UW3n6DEBigekM~EyahiT4=tsaWey)+T zPdeh)u=qvkS0n!#@1>hfzoA73{Ceb9p#8-!zI$MYD1KGW%az#f%*HQo(E-0KpG(sZ z;#YC-bU$H}cxtD{RyzfIy6wq1GkYxEPE!rz z&p7WDl%3r6s$$WBopcYP?q?LgriB;fmmc|~toi``%1-+@vgm-H?o)K{aZD7JuHS_E zHRg!Bf<*`XbT6ZOA7s_R)4h!DeUPnlmfp@Lc~9b8^?mH{)BTR_y^_g213N%|-S6n$ zD>=600-o-7)V-4OW0m(VA|8OJ`yF+!r10{*cM*6|{vNP=u6j6d<>zzm{gko2!g}hS zNZn7VdYC^qY=2KS|EDz747dMoJuN$Yrtg`g-&9ZQ79Qd_=X~$7=A1WflCOLJ<-np7 zWyc|(YhDtT+pVXmy~Fk?65qW?GiTvN@hgAV@R_Tg)-5`SlN6tG@8j%Pcv1X{d@gfo zSU-1M8T({dzcHVy@V-#RW!k}Oi!SXrjdxkVFG{ZA_e}X*^|ayeE0b>5;n#KWM#QVq zPZ|$(8bSQRu1(63rM{AX?BJEZZ{$r-U*Q!m2GDt?YL6~G2RK`9+#y&_*vP=|{bx;`zqoPsC|2}iR-}j#T{LcN2 zpHK7oyzlpSp7Y#iJI^`y+;i_e*L6M|s_U;I5q)JGmqT2sFR}CN{tdxjMSIgf-Oq}a9MP8s ze^=?NS$r=4vX>eErp>qemK@O+#c>t1BmIjMX7?|8xzRVRzh*5tqOS{mQM4oVl@wnU z^1I+;e{Gx-%;U%v#*RALX|X)eCGMiPjdC9GC12)BbG-1m;@U<1wEmjf#gCWhtKzsM z0|ElgE^e@{o_6?Psh9$>kcMjKUv8#OlT>Wck$q~DI(APx#8K>B;zJD%# zUFezCzw(xxNt}2b+K2io7N1LBDf5>r9bLFA0+xZkW)llIUW~w^W!OU^t`C~NKj4<{*EAr<8{-LBl>dJ z!fwQs@yuIxx#C&5&K#G4z2c16rQ;dj-M3rx#eQy%Dm9|3K**TYN5kHN-d9Hhxo|K5u3AP;ml(i+PLjplI>A z^mT7GdZzWOmL*60>p@=$_A;J*i%;%bkWc)O`vYUtC%*36FZ3$tDMgQio>lZF;#g4h z0_bH$A0dxxirxjispu8ZJBpqLy|3so&_{~iK);Xf8T2;=dP31V7%$U`UIsm<=uyy% ziax;kuA=B|(Cdm`1HGl_3DCQW-okl)py(OU$BN#=yeC!+#-RXuQqkj}XB2&e`Dk9z zyP%g8Jr8)hThRxY@AnkF1o}|Xv%EgoE9h?@*H3XpFM^&@^f9g{vx?pV zy`bn>(94RR0KKN@EnKfR6}<|2N6`zQ_Z2-2`bg2cSoes2BN&GU=m|wnfu2_M4%U%! zik<_#sOVA9D~jI1dR$%6>!7z3JqdbO(c4(x94LAT^s%C6L67Ynj6)ym&PhdYfu2$H z4Cr}9A7g#Kr06}+tBPI#y`ku7(A$b01HGr{UEJ3gDtd+YJN60s8wWkE=p)=eN-261 z^sJ&+KrbkI9`v%Jr$DbMdKC1gq7QK2u%qa0(EAqMn}5uBZfa!J%X!!PH~A5x`}%Q_ z^C_R3;(3(!Ym*kA+^@|B%aM{*miw<&*jE9a`k;OSa=*0K3EnTI-mvEw_}=a#c=+SK zx83yMcRum8r$wOseAG+00rkgak6rrkJ)hf1>czhy?1_HU_)UHG{S=WyJ&!@p-VeWY zQRm)|UZC~-9eU#HKK0Hup1tKbQ}4}lm0$FScI2SHr0l4nOg*&Y3D~jwnkOy$NaXe_ zSkLD|Uxpo9?6`2#?>%td9#ZeM(>&^7nf^=JYm*uG>*D*FxFmtX=b9gYEmy&|BbZD|!<2o<;ZMMut{d@~_Q&EE#{?&o6oRHPt?`y#8T( z*?B8@!RN6LMtl72>N`LAiOui&xrvkieAtGlzwBGR!*;yl;k%?>;#7n^RUq}XtaU?) z6ZzygiANLsJ)qFV?}1eoztbp>fnk0R)c3p7@i(?#>C0z}=1642eeP>jPB?l?`CH;r z_?C$?->W@q=RI~l`Yr2!Nb1G!3hEa>hYNif?293M;y3xEEPgj|To(wwNZ%@p-zk(w zz%aj)Z}NG}ui<&j(r^CrpFMu|&52+3c(XSge`u6^ZlBjSxL52Hzw`T>xRilxZ+ksf z{3f3qCw|w#-vJ6;+Pi0!#qT7_LtvQS3AKL*?Fh?rJ_mU$I>3duZ@xuk-@Eq`J8Zu< zMg3;?ynf_eCtfmnj9L87ecSk50#cv-T{iKXd?Hu;u7SS|6uS7`waVgm0_6cP%zG(3Yy$N|`i!SY0v&zzraqu-M$MIaC%oA$r zy(`+s_##YVme&sccgxvMcYkJ;>$}@OaHFaB_6Jw;C`alg90<~QT3+llYJ+=zN_0dljFqiG58Z@KOW+D$|{TBRq$m&5A%C)PjH;cA8MZa z4f8wsdDG9<5QDtmRi|A3&fg#Mo`>ac>8}yB?*-*Zz4+aNJ$!Da_Z2g4^(^}(e$+Gh z;E;FhbDLcM)a}`RMdXN{#1uX8gH3$+ybSfEK{s-IJ!=WU`)%;y=hr&v)sOyN{uVu% zDS9f9$LD0IrxBuOZ4vDKntL2_%ZKadJS2Zhf1@0hX+O)1o0R8y<0htQUQ3%_^bq53 z9GC=3t@zPdGWa}q+Nzg!8NyyZ$HP1*T71$!$tQ9pAFHTuS$sn8Kwd}D^Pu+?eT4QO zS#-(k=%Id|OI}yNmjKR-Eb!Gjmv^NvX@CjB3F z^?=lu!+io_lss#pUdobBBb4KZ`}rXGk+jN_`~Y7Dba#Gu_y6AHe0m$qr&qss)o0hq zuKZ82&-Qy4%%^X?ar^VfXFqn9)QjIu*wY2lZ~HkU@tb^docKKif9yL!zY|tj{4Rqp z4SJa0l|Kc?`@+d@Y+s@s-X#`AB5Qp4!qZ>;!J@LmC^;U4?fb3AgCgWF z`tKVX59;7Q>#pnDZ)QBmt~C32&{z9*bfIqywEL~ZDP4JE<3VH)%n#;i*mw}%*~|wv zz&g$!_B*_`?2A92v0pE*$CB6o@hzPPkDbgjC;0)p20-c?p6@?zJIN2!Ge06n8h?^N zq04xXw#wpn4aem`cjt$9o!<-k-P_L0OTzq)z1R5t5mD^@3b9Y_{jbaVKa{`4uQu&C z!N}ozwDvwF(tjvtH964xz5DAgzi@2rB#bNGdqv7F+9SN8CvudD1D`jKA7RcD3DAYl z*7H#zc)z7q*eQd8@r)2`>Z z4*DF$x85&EO}$_guK}t~ECM_Qg_={8+5VD@#7G{fW(hzM0p9 zZL5CL{wP<0jAP&8o3y`Gp0q#8iDOjzgPyYJ(#~0{EbZJvyb7R)wR2a!55>4L{`6bo zBmIl-Kkte8!A_C?ZgTG1o|$~tQtBDsML1F3@P*4)z4`v{|4NRRcywXU5J-LY^HdTK z^2u=$kLdT%?m(f7-x;ece%B#454y{5&!-vd>hzQQjEQ{7%i_Py_hngM3+S73)%R26r@}{buo@TH5&Q9e? za~_`d9(M0|Tn8R!;<@L>nX@s}S^mv@54!;V?0wahV0-O&bsnf{NjGPcf#+dclhQO^AA4qNwLrN`yu$f(xShdcj&+N zI8f@v?*{DY0I9EbOYr)Kd~%%lJph07grMJXt1Nz(C>QiFzY~8B&TnZ)nBO(5^K)PI zOAfef|6eY*(d2%D_*I8K{T-QPBIp}qfP zdr=~n&jsk?#6JGKrkpXqDZvimkv!_CeWx?1uLF?|6Op2~4f<^Fw~JhT|DE%quy*47 z@*xanH$3s|a(}t|@@+-2ouAJ$e|J3o51+g#^J!DRV1eF$oO+~Q+BtKQiGKmeys4mU zwq4Xx7=qq`WrL8 z)4uFApMR&FJ7MuCe$R~WQZIRvQr}Y=Lw~Yn;%3VfJGmc4}oQ$F6$Cy7TAWxd})`BXn{B1b=eUOUx4pNpIUzk>+&U644q#s$7dA@yR9eojAins2Y@DV}Kj)cYOeEIyHw{ATdI0lnV=_bK3h z2aI#wlH;;Bb+R94S33-><0tVu$?)s_5F$VD{SrMGR=ttR{0cZuKbNkbgU?!WL?8D{ z$fDhtXC=kQeGa%^XcKYm0>uiKUEEJ0bxJS}`n~6Y(#QQ0xXwkpqNmRu2kwVa#(VQ( zmn&~`mYhi(U?10~sIRQ}xF13a@n#-O+s7d{_Wc)q+%F-5{Gh&}rOy>lzE3voJ+IUm zew;*Kc^jC&S- zv7Plip>~FEkHmrd9PmCd^%c(aL?-x^F&*F2%DR+uL zub#BunZ^&^uce%L-M3r#xE})dRp9y7-mg{oxQ{^+apn6<-KT@`;{F3e@KIhF=XJ(G z?Er$c)5fcsB}d}f zhd#X@LfhhV=}Xs*Ur}p60ardm&IA9R1{DZ99zg5JMjZ1K7D@x6ZT-xa1W zb6zlB+?PS`-%wP1+?PS`-%!GS0Mw_iLu%1rKjpp*dVhz$rO)Lb?`PleG*)Djju50_i6okp!9LS1-&mr^a4K) zVn6p=(EBoUFZbt5!pHp<^u7$;rGxFweG>G(4C!TjK9`?-|9@IP>?-@YpF)!H#e3Kz zi%;@YU!UuJ8Msfv5OO#VNM9I?R~7H!>-`kQpiADk{Ns5}?{A>{PgCjR{ssx;0ng7p zi_fKx@BL5fKk*+2{fprJdA*-PM)7sP$Ndy&SNXiz+qsAL<)_UbTS_1IOW?i>)YrH8 zTyfz0{nPqS;wQm4aNh;)&p>@y#mD^;nrMIKjs1M0^dIhrp!Zc6ThB2HUk3XaBoJTf z?OOXGxcub)1=IRZ^rt~TW7t<>@u7u6U+zGWshw`u@4jcX>>Me5 z1;tl|+#=eY?Kf?|mFhu$yhUIB7E?~39hrAMOP|=S=TGh1f^vG0(}W!6W&GlxfB9R@ zaRtPc@k}4*%X7sub%&|%Pl;z$>5FyDadGAw&R;EyPxN{JCO_g3#|hEZ560H<6306D zhe}WU65oH(!}VZdAIBAL_x*R}Nx_mM`ih8u6Y*dis}`S2Umfu;DSi4p*|X$`z6AKo zXlLphTYN5k8MNE9ewVq_kCW&dLElK}D_VSVzmR;=PI6zciu#ttC-gYV9Yt@#{=TB8 zK_4l45A7bk%(qwM7eG%adK&b!qL0wOa*Eyry{PCF&?|}_1HG>34UA7MMNfg=RrDdo z{ehx4Kp!i58T8oY!8qhVPb&HV=k<)Dw?WS`lQPG=NXQ(K81@yY2=Rt2N`Vi|t zT}AJJK2Y===wn5Xf*xxH<50)?SW?k*pl1|43VL4A>sV(jDS8g{s-h=BZzy^j>$Yu0 z&w}1l^ghQEk#-R>+QqgmuXB0gNdS1~ZpqCWAe~QspRrD6< z4Mnel-nQu8{3 zv&!=PO}1wE3!qaU)K5U33yzeHKE9WcEt_?KEw^qT!MP-l5&KCa#+EYArSx!|@XB*a z!`}v&HdrOBs~)cXf&upTuVbJ1U@uJwMyN zDd-3F^7%PCuJZgFzhks6Djv(u+kBOi2FpoY#LvExM>$e2?LUM)xj&n@^7jCSN`YKeWhO7nR=w`vCL@aeA|zwtZ!=G zYrXIbD_?{ViAj^6jBho?pN0IjPk-b!j$uB(w_g74;Qf^{_zQnBVWq$r_pKo1Y=MMRK{w4nq@}9ZnxT|!2O8?|@pL|X*ev`3l48KIK z_`!Exh}<{3jQ5?&)_R?c3+X5Bxcs*tnj9-4A|=R`zeO*f6Xo-Q^s8a)>-e7O2 zKf(9QlQ$#pizs+GFOOM)Q>Gb zv7?Oh9Q89U@s97m7q5jGt1NcKAg5^2U3QhNdY4@dv`fw6bJ@jwYgv3^SKlg&U1hfO zZNB|NkANPt=q`JcR=vyK3i?;Z;&a){@uOhziM>^;EOzA~uVv9)c6F?Jmt8}Qmwk)R zWf#ZWvBf8LC2kMKs{?siMbCnsx9DOozgykJd8TC5i@n~z$&XmI>cvj(zsfvJ;(DxU z@rj*Xt8D9S;Cwo=>Royxclds~^zynmVeyIHOt2g&T4kAkG%>F!gHAu;_5|emHS%2W zx{vprcwV!QlX*PfAAANKId@3=`(JwOGc(@1e-#HVwd87BC3f0*EDFWH0qy*S@tgO{ zMuF#TeLc@Y&vqLxIC0yZFP!oI`M;s(kl+5~V?ST<9rueKFFx}Y>+#AS%gpwMe&P4p zZN~k%x>YZBXHhN!8K<_z=jmO7d?Hu+Q=j#B`t2C;7{LC0Bl*k+N<4 z>ObCi>B{R#N$MNWhiwfaOWm6K@D2wCfVEJ+!Tg<%+2LOYPPTCo zzw5B44divc{T`P1O+NbFr+?j`-!ZE!eiy-)1U<~}l-e(n*P&tKRWf7razDJQUw*KB z;_quqiGAW%4f^=r6XofBZ764w2;Q-u-r?bEzxuNeJxDoy$l>)0uX9HG+Ve1Pe?Hi= zt{mw7etO4U&+mNC>oNJ;i{CuTVVU+x*=w2^*E?vgNaokZ&m2(rWn3%XAMCdUt6uz1 zpv>zX`d_p7q+Q7;awVTzsP9{RLLVazLq%_a9=R)+2XU(`c~Agf3iPl%NZcJfZ!sUk z@__rieH#~K?_B??^Rv;a6d@Mlz zDJPV!;~EH$5&q^WCSRJ{n7pll|FEC$nd3XDu>5!<9)TbOrnJm>f1%NqsHTP++v zI^6Eh3nH1f7=6sUzGaWd=eiW%o2C4bk{`Rr_>n0E<>z8S`DyTp{Sq&ptBE7%&slt8 z#~9y#r+&_7OBSD(zYFWZa-?IGrM)YV-vix!Kf&9FMeS=cewXoY+P)^--!giy;Sby2 zQs-$J{GWV%t2?A01l!rq)5uFEo{WRUkw1wi`w)@&H{QUU-?^_z9s1;0$-CCugLzj( zeFv!R8H1j}d+%X!EPuh|A;;x5%0K$!iubY2X}`1&uNU|}K93`hpet`G_nCMn_V@Eo z{7O9-9A|UjYXWV*o~i=@qKZZ ze6cg%5BgQV$?xxzaRKYR`hD@HrBCeaqCB*|qbKwV?YH>7{xv`PTi;JtI~2g5u=vED z(vik*`or-wW${V>&0A&9&j`=|wW?XKsaW+c{goR{9BLMyOF#3hW$}srey|*g-0%A< z`PoC>#6Y+6N7`O~avn-PZtiz*KM7vXEdA3nAJ@kSe^l{jA%DH-vuo*oB6*!zHrQXw z;BU8P-v5w%X@A%3heX|(Trgj_zM|J>`rDwQYiWxPGPAORJV1X?L!_>GjLxw!S=9d`ecm$O&6t99#NaeyMfF8SOAodicIS z-vej-3cvH?H|d`!7uF8MZN@rg(>l)8UoxogSbXAdS*>Hz|AECP{U!SQpj~m)r!2a} zMX#@Bta_JSTwl#wd@j4#zGaI~>}ptLiB}Kp)V1g?yZTnW%Py|3jx0WxUChtegMNI( zuC!GayPB}8V9{N6m8^P~T}8;LT6`|M*gu;VpV-y2%3@ar^2Qe3Wmohe-#?dKT;EMt zd@j2<{$wmZv8!m6#jY{NqnbsZ*oEhL##@y2z_^d|bjcu*fPW!1a%^1PI@_(X3hSdP@KvYeNih)WZ6>Vw-8u;*8;_n7lj z*gTTQ69<+)IsY`&{$=IOjo;Bf802xHSo9`ApMAfr1xpSp=Df!1!|n&odH>w;d2e-{ z2V1KL&w~}{sU2bFfk8XG>j+#Yb6=tHQRetT(jP~qU3gu{>nhq|ud8^nL)SBS|CaYl zB@SM`%vjGzJ?!U;=;geK*IU$Eu=r-vTg1GS_aVddHZ6G*e|a4Vq~5;8H|c*U+w)qX zS3plZ;`<}?DClWLAE2Fbir(G9^rNCh_wqkdvC5K9EgWA5-EL>`S$>kIMKz!2{FB$a z_HnX~!hK^GVX@%gzn>O6?4h6BD)Q`gmh*9ee_-{J&+c{D3LBdG1q+5sAN5GR#5wY) ziBAH^b(jpwMviaCL9k=plQ&=Q$J?(msdDJ8FBwy$! zu^Z4g^LeAbRWEi|QEmbm$Fard>0N?+qF35K{+RJM10=nG<8l^V+PP?zrJZ|d-wNnq z>q;}O*FRv!jcM2Gg|6xUZOH%gJ+)=9geIm=ey(+;A^0CZD*yA@uGdRb##vsc6M4N} zTiWykUaw~#_xqLPb?NKDaW9Vg5|HgI4oDoEpwE82?wtq!61=YL9QelWN4$nSTo^s( z-Ss1WSQow0Us6vPyUiCTB9Zm)zjmFAmj3wfjao4)jJ`CIx+ za$x-C^$E{s`aU7$tSSe3zh}SppL5rE^?^&}Z_l53lp|%&h8gQ+w5tYv!Z$h3sQsWD zR=wC)LYdb^^tWsAN!-aNawYCV)W@Fm^HJzo&=VG2+9Pe1r9H-IhaBjx_KuPbsqKm6xk9$V+x)pH_K@}i^UQI6D0 zUUXoOey(|7*)RD|J$$aY^T07@zV*@C$3%|j?>x$pva|>NBW9oW<0f|L=Uwww{iHvk zteKKkAFI2p0O(GKlQIe*Q{zm^C%wPR}blj>JySuP=2;}n@X^T(Vi+rM2+AELxip3}N2ISN%y0l}{ zDoZ=2z}Epiv>o5%bNTBbz8~9Zqc8q#$I}iMyY2WMjrbmO@9XP4efniTGWFhf+>}1{ z6RDr{_h(Fevq0u|5oIICe?MS-*ik&G_KQ#7`;AFE+IAcRJGOaZ$sgXe-i;$U-iz0~ zq$SVQ&LgYdHBLo_ejbS3E%5h%9Iq1=pR_ai#13iC4C;#(pU|t2Q?}^R&NZtn?L0>N zHYq3M`GoVw5Pzc=;Xc~t469;uhO3}J8dFD5>Wa}s4E$Isu*k-wL$aOCaJ_H*a3 zp5xRhu;Y|PPv5iamY;f5>b-c)qaG=HEHlQbRzTm(^K8ee7rRR+*MN-Uz~YnkB%kP& z_KZAd{7eE#&*HeWMVEHYS!HSGHrp5Uuy!t~{H1-2Kf)yHBX<7Yfr{^awX)4+9~-V? z>K81iDS4D5^%9RB?1{fU*p4I1ep}C-&@(LkW#dyKP_SsmZ&x#yP$9P#R%XPsf<;h(QRg9qE5SaQ=tPd)Xy$@7vDucFeY+p!FL>p;e< zjWYGnjx}J%Bb#saxkX2B&M?H9H?tvw~I=Q@+c8R=T;*tPTkG&tci&pNArXxSHjf7||2FZo10EYm+JOMYQEk)ApEHDOO1C`5^y z-jAkh)r&txl&e7cGqU(3&&VfoC;9ZEi9;GldIra36}^vkC|GpKzp_=9{L6x`2D&@{ z7A#r4H@Lpdb?()(`<&p#C-4)wyzbM-*^Clb9!nfs_D!w>UI^xW7xjsei3g7pxuQ1% z`m}X%y}rfoTTENu;`1nV=y{{hqjbSP^?4Nay$>BPu4@swzNMc>Nxo#_Bgab|Q>ozk z))@BWz^CI_1%0;lEy?$WTIUISf0^r1%=dw1-{gGvH)F4Ue>n-d_#y2Z!S|yxpu3-w z@vdv`3+4^=avZb$mGOh$yS@h%pFVTPuYBlRYds=*rJm!|#i-x7y!}?q=a*UhJ;WyL z=>n;*va0=FjIZZD$obui!=G+_?kbb>nyu$j)L*^)cDvrZ?@g2OP~u%te$gKjA8-En zcN51Hkapxyra$!ex6t###&@3m??3GPSJuL-pKlS@?{f`!*)LPzcMzU*(4m3e#853 z)5c?tD@2Yj!)MHT0N2l}&?oXI?|9~6vC|%>Hb?#Yo_Xk~r~Z)tps8Q5 zAffb8kJL-QZo}?A?Z-OX7-b{Jx8r!|xitRT%Qv4Eudtru)E7~|;DtlBz36MNT`l!8 zPEn7PJ(d~sjmp@>PwHiS)$67;t6uERpj-eljxCE%#v}5HTp4$Is2^K=LXV>yebu)^ z#+`&!mT{+wxTHaMk2{`yow=R&_jU?WRHV( zI!5Xx9u3&j0WuyVeBXj{sOKff+4k|j9C*y{zx*xMvmKX2{g;mXY3m2O9{jwi_pU3I zUpk+n|1$AQ0%=DUW$K|Fe}|sumOt^H2mX28E3Bs-OQHU~<7*2i^tSqt)Jr~556kpl z%93BaJ|Om>e-N-^=6P>q)k|D!D7S$0C;sn1o-9E=(J%RwMt#BJ6M7MHN{T)}yHzc^ z*9P64e+w4xtHbAvY4?+Vzv|nJiP$PXSAT3a{P~icSDNZNbOim0|Cl&< zG8X?P*I(-SUq z&?B$;?J4rJpvNt`*BZw0{Qnw?Vh# z&IXY4HQzhrb3lCl>kGS`Gt$QhKlgzk{|NH;Tjt4Cb-qYGjN-xbW8%LiextHkAGLK% z+VNmR*Y6!>L9gI=@j>#wZk5IF9Lg=AE#LRsd!9q(Dc2`CPT9xF`IGAvAHjOXKJWO! zf-n5`pOg3N?DOl|Sg+XY`>Xz|b@(c~h)!wO`0K{+G?4oGC;R#C`LhK12`?XKE3csevwbg;#V8T4JJ-#jW$@w9nF8=tA zpOkvf-+3jA-)plO^UkqV@0xc;7ub2=?LPp1eZM|w@kx7-PwbHP$fCYv@d>>Jc@>K; z?NqnQ(oPxhwLlMRr&KpM4&?4O`P~HCc{|B#$eVqg&O2WZgL0>~|G?<|5fpy#;0yNN zI`Z(T5)XS^{Tk}Oa{Iz(_g#LpkJL}vf1!zc4ak1fKf<2}h#X!YodY@7{Oh)VocQ>k zHq?4{M*ZWJKOXwmd8`(H^Q=RvtA{pTu#uZ#L2(DnR< z*B%SFFIe&^|9EMq-WjHxUDD4Np(ju-SadIsX1pgc?>-Sw!R=xBeo|B0+$jMrKVmIHzVgFz| z6)irm-51uZvcz+Y_HHYB1nt?i=wfd(YVwljmw{C;cJRA}{GJ`-+_VK1iXI2O zY|+Ku$UB1hTC?iK4t{@;-`!*U?0j|QVeAzXH;#+^t|Gs?$2=Ssaf^nKfjmA@8HoMJAZ_a-#O%W@R;|tuLj3O z+C3cm@tN2Sz45mN?e2n}vgocn%UboWJZnNu!Qyk}8QZC1@kyRFt+Ln~gS?)ichQ~$ zi!Syy)(z&_*s2$MvFs)pIr)t-ZZ;t=_I5umlXk&4%kiA+8!3xV>@HYk&+hpHJWo|s z^aAL0MIThq|1G*FH`2ArllcMo2B331hC36G>$Qm5uY~sVd|@9a^G)tovIv2>^2qOw z&tGY;b48#%uU#MYA3J}gwHmu$^ixysUH2$`)Fbs0$Lu>yT#G=?d#flLIldhSLC<^d z{P;Ds?|kw+)^q)I1JpNGIq#aYA3gj)srTYFk9wpm?M*+4v6$b!GM?!5_=Ht2cK2Z4 z2*@~QEIv=~666!TlD7raS1mrFHzB8P(WRYRR$1CP4!$nvu6eKUF&|qmn0;6H+=SS{ zpDPZLW&JovzBK+Aybg-3V#bps_!vKtDSES@&pv&)*w;m+)H@nCw33M8l0c^z@PZO=})!}iGK%lJwGplo?6b2i?mDDDvRF{lnX#x zzOl;KrJvhpzO!H0$4URXhLC5UdxL-I*k z{2k)B*gJ!MC9JaeRR>=hbXUH)?w1y}GKk?=L_(&YnDBJJP zdi`vE!Q%6D%(y-r(|(Ij^p2M{c2ghUTd!Jtp8SO^t8Dw*f6>IFAE@`{8+fjR@9o{( zx%iiVczmhJbMw;9NxWwqUBURr`K82zKN*J_7a9AO1+lx+M(3_{#J?_)qR442GWv6~ z$Z^FZ3H}mL;yu29Vpk6JS&J@qMX*0u6!m$lUi9gG)akeGS2Y~hUC+M` zmVVW?%k|js-HEiFYy2U5?$@3V`U-te%E_;U9hdp)j z?Dj<7=ldo0Bx{C03uM1dT6`{h23wo+uf*MDPY!WO1fJLN))N!K^L@?IBlZknM+C>w zp0>p&<5VBz^g8}HB6jNWGxC1lUzeRF$cbBgVuv0-8K<?BI2G z+Ts&CiotTEW|d`p>tbHm0Nt}?#!s$0s>=oY$Kvl=Y-aM@K5k+k_Q~OM@a!+mbNzOZ z_K$wR#6dp?p8{Qs5j*>^FAKV@j|PjK*++xx23#NEcx4|a^F2P7vK{tGDZjMQ_~`w= zyS2!adamyriTx?|ef|59lNRpKHuc_nLrNd@Nc|*FVQ&w}>+X@|pKZtXu;U-6ul>9G zUpaFnqsO=7XxQ=euWC0N?+Vu!S67xg2HPv|k0SMlxej*rBxvb1xBaRS|S-7og(`z_3`!O?zx318TK z5WTL>d41S@khW!~_)|l+|E#suz30?km{q>e4>?eel9L{`phnaJ`!M6}ax6 z{g5ADS02RA_2qbeEWTe^vyK!0iYT`fJ%Mu9qKn`9{5G)a#SUI$6C0GFEwFFXCKO^cwP^Y|+Ku8uqJYf2~>dVn^8hm}&Qa5)uErKWT5oyA5QX zj+DNz`z<<8IUfzXk5c%sA18@R8s)M@cjal#su#N(4U;DwAm`6^o=W~Kw&&Nr-=eqF zGuMA3ORmtnC`Uiy+v&=mgjMg#pC;s_Ek0NN)Dic*#V7ewvC3js4DygZ`xK_>?%XvK+&V1k1V>_+sl|dVBSRk&-YX8DE-vLtp;TK zOv{_{rEe^6ib`MVB6D00$h@g3z9#CsK-#79W&!Wl*P_98t(}GPM}2=KetqbPTXa{R zrL21IxW#&M_XYJNQ7#7gBb|E% zj|JnB0X=2W#opL_4NYUHp8~*6(0e|PGK~Gq8PhTW$m1Ta|ZkXe9pnE>g_{nuZaqZys z3ZH9czq5~%c1T=e2$oOoXMmr4 z(T|(>Y;fx)kMNq1j!y1pDE>6~SK8&}o7na~zejmIcwJNkfAkJB-rDhyIM-1>{6(zH!A_u5-pO8+m+A^rhQJ=Y1-d{JYpHd6-zk_+40F?&DEj{%t0n!sq41 z66BMzv|k3t6@lQ3l&!M(HG*F?@`vnmlfE$+FYad==2v_bbE0&UxxQBN07hQa<|Q!*>7ilk0$X66OXq=K6tDw1u*Us53!r? zJ!c;@<6jQ;NIieje$++ed(ZVtO`h<5-3s){v6FQm+~=g;9O|1u(uH5_8GxQ?nf?*B ze?dn*_s)LLeqzg&{N?lL+}G&S2R?NFb<5?B5xr8+b(?K);P{af_gk>w}?Ul`7AF+(_XoTX{++r|)tHC7NcYM1kkM1zo`-Q>O}Y7NgVnnXCh@+)7+AXp_4gXA-Dj}; zTZ5(h4JIEl*vGz^{Xd(ybsjhLG~P?dJY~w+rw!)*gz}#ariKQ`&!YZ0gRSQc_TFOh zrX4kyiy2HTYcRf?!N|J|_JFMwOdhwFH}v8P28Zu4n0T+L&tjk0_KJp{d%wZR$_Aqe zgFWmA+`xX~!w(sH^&}0UJsqv@3vnfY*H5mIA>c4F;TL%3QgXz3Eu84B&P(!aChI+jB zlfnBS$s-ND53C<;%9UdbmcM5(d91Af9hx<%<@R-5;7<&9Q)W2@9 z6EX9{(maEs=Zw9v`KCMs))ty_5Bq4eUod=)w;6gOW-z|2!Ps&J`|mW^dzZn+yA9Tt zH&|Q2VEH`;3-2|UU&&zZeFhsJFgX06!NP|OMpiXA2KGK|%I&1V^hXV*K4vifaf4l8 zD`m?4H4XMYVX(B8!Tj0=TfpWzraTxM|NEZ;-)9Y0KWDJFKIluB@i+c?Qyy$+u)DFr zQr2K`Q-it94L09uj_Yn=%8f4?Oyjw{=vJm2%Nb0@4S#K4&`SoR-!d54-{2TH`nD;z z7a1%ZWH4Vgm^u{Y!wlvQH<($`=*fNu78uorE3heJVma^iY})jJI4?lhSFrNPXv z45qs%--YsT3=Zxwn7q$m;(mkezQOz-3^pGzSbGe(v$3Q9xGDFZFj&C;)y1bwxxKsL z8}4Z^hJAjce=_yCBK+CQU=RC?wuh#^hW#4L&zW-Kd4mn?cUBsiavS?*<^E>MJ?s+{ z$Nn${>=TlG)zo*fUqTn})pzh-cN_0P*CJ-#mzifUKHp$x0m=(eKFruXSi+RkZ!y>d z#_-(x=_o2KQULCmH!I+}F(EzGxozzlvDr$l$(40qYF| zU>Dc14P2*maUBuEd^7qN8{Fl!-D}CGDr(xfc`3oDLy?ydNJEpafBfj|hbd;L`iRrbw*`)azJ#JKyo%}p|7A7|g)}OuHx3@I4=K6!{Sj~)iPN@Wa zzyh}jg6u(O9 z`^uD82Oryk{DnE>v&%2aH*kVUBS`;zaw1HRxyDJI}b|({|Wt z$ESn+P3afqi(Hr9=qADTjy&nsn*yIL&(_<$()dfg)7qt?^u})v>gD*}bm*0K(feSt zKTI1h_@2NUwKMsJV0=32J4Td~1D_oqv9lA>&!^d0zHn~w>?u1FYCj0tIS#S25|VFW z{H>7rNtj=p4{-eAIBVyLsC)#btRq~kY$V9FuH?yX_xSrfYS@cZ$v)a#s z^2gw__1O8X+r#D)dsrqGHVx)YAtb(4@bNgYQ}i-kdY)nPd4JCs$2s2imHxbXe~Nxb zHZykGawSgDn^b?qdCt|o!XNu}ke~8h=LhGv%!jb~+(_+vPx)c?q!j;b6B3zNrj zC;ivi$6by$#2)+}0~22~@yY_l9*M)?d3Sr2z-Pxz{G&bP<^DJ0U|-qO-Zj{ci{rAT zdpyXf{btEOtsU7vm?zp#j&r>3aPfJ^%oykDu(JbXoU`gZO7_d4!!MCbdx*TAp}e%Z zK46|@wwf6yJAd<=nePxXP9l##m);uW36JDU^15KYP;c9zSNJ1pUQ2%0{K>Yn)idJ( z`Dvq|%g%HzI3A4dRCeM#Q2-y~D)Pk6gu0Gre5U15{1UStH2Fmye=a)*%FfmuK|3iY z`lXreD0X)43i2~AU3LopK<(2{`Crq%dUKlu^)jxp{7gG-z54v?>011A=`BE>Fp1t;$oaSG&@22I zy>2qgdcS=>DxGTlqhE`S^!^Y&UJp#WZs7cT+I2%3`)KI(0b8%c2d~jZh&(SxzhdH^ z0_K4gpvaMU4AlIN{x!j8w}oKh4lL(`0RMP+NWf#pNoI`dsvKj z&mm9vhpK(1}S5VRyFOz{IF;t+YsZY57cma5c6Zs!bw}oDL%rujd4=7KU)tWL+Sg*XJQDxv z>U(9BA9la7Ifv^@k>3cpPw0C7#O~)@ucbYyvpJ@?MLK`ZoeBL=e5CK-11%R zBylQ)v}@RWzM$T#W1L+5LgaTs=CQ7Mm_0u5`jzr^J1|bf=GTMy61&|UhaUKN9Q$WW z-S4H|P`^Ur7RKLD?-4P7!}v#P9db5%?6~EQGS8uxFwRel+hEUN+@c}Z1<|76({anp zas5SqUw$^fB!42AVE)g>FL7W$?(Y;n5Al4M@tz>>=VbBR*AV_PKROS)^C`C1%(&R& zAJ@IPj-}g!;~tUgMJ33k{*3xw4&~KD^z(Xcg#C`0Z+81h95|mKhRrKR%AVdH!FHki z_%~+8L)tN>)=Ouze==^&;ru(vlfSy#$JM{={?a~c_WP!c7csVXu)kzN?$@Tl$K#|O zZN24tZ<#z-%zV~)!Q+TkrFXQgJN_+)UWrd$U+>_0dD?wHJujVRXKJ5dd=eqo9eME4 zKaneT7DDpeWvB4h^X@o=tuHrJo-hx?(SIIf1>Zz`yD7`Cq~55@jUh&`@;E&Kz; z&wl56?oRk)zj@>RLikH+UQPL~`G!5t>E{o0o^X64@;TD{H-q_73z;8Pz-Q-+_xIFw z1J1{|ZlKpo8zI*_eTP2rm*eWRaf9P2F>GAT?icjGtiG$r_?N(E`)|izUr$YoKkp~@ zmHuqV{pLu?*lFvRe5tALjnUq)`D14g%*Sc{uNh*Gt3S;a58H0Z8|ERA@fgBSjz`H5 z{jqP&jE9{cdYx43XI>D)@}menv}d$~d%UZK*u!-h{hW!mhh^ee>FucdK^zAY`_CQ+ zJ^#>oN&ktwp3>{ZCFo%s5+V0F>JED(Pt)qY!nAR@rSf_je{^GayM#SAPzbp`4O>r4 zsP*G%_EbWivkdDu%#&&BkIWBZ;(*}zH3&K1XTitg*pA7S<`%cX9Im6JKhiIKzhCDe z?IMnqUo|y<_`0NeU@-qWySeRefzQ?>?KDu=8MC$1 zgkPr3wV^uTB95&J74{<_wa z>^v^NGk9I4`y0=@M9v3`<)FQ#kojN@e73!I{QCIL3EM~OXTKnZop*-Ho}RiNK>4wQ zXO076562&UA5YsuKZs?>6FzB&M#z101`j7aVQ+dmIZrF27#W~zJ68YIVuHSd(7|-Gy zpza-TCmTB>?s{3Tq&I6^*g5xO1^|1R-mAixa zGfjRk7nINb>w5l5@*xqj?jP1)iW|A*hdpQ0`*M(<@eGsSQU22YF#d>o-g~zA*yF0s zH#-l!zh~S>?0qMgSG|zD8iUW4Cvnb%toys3-?RJ0v~@I&zr?U{xO_y={(-ulW}F+~ z)AkQS=G(6I9q~7o4YoVwyVlq2cHw))Y)9J;;p21RwY|+efqeFOA$(lVFDx|gAC#ud zi+hkqJGDGMk20EtPx6NM_lU)ciF*y$1`dGHBZKWyQgNn#De&3xkT~~3-tQ0VFGDq+ zQ+^nK_r|%6Kly%;pYaSk-$g>M%fjC4tG_##S8Ug?^J8NU^K?58r_F!Z4#d$>svX1T zIY%2l9>?>}Amq9}Y(1<$$M+{&ce>jp>^+){IxozYClWW#8>h`zIZhG7#;fFagYis< z%wu!l)A4Moyk#D`^4zvxug}`!fTv@|^<|j-LuG#=p5jNTR;2WU?Le6}93zY}u* zBkX+FQse4u`7iP#A?+J>zbg4ApFh^?qPCwBPnL<*V}o(agsgwIz{le_E>%LtXIEai z^z-~jd4nB;?Z&vKs_uR;RPU9O-=$yLp{C~7%!_IBj%j(yxDW@hmwrV;*0Z9=x&0cc z=ijFJl~VIf&ZEQbKUUQJM8+X3Zi$d~c0F$+aZaiET?z9m*L942Ue)U>jHkrWl|R|< z2lICnvW`*$pDl0FFV%T$wm8^!R__hI4<+{T=dyF8?5u?3L;U!VeCP(x&$H!&Z725u zV?NMEL6@C%=$HCQe^K)S>g|NsnNZ^>`NQ(6F~{q<%$vNP)9)wRdEkmel)G*1l1Ar>-k?SW6n zp)<$lxC(Q8uArdi9n?v+Z`}UH+6{92z0>&IP+XZ*R^Wprw= zT{2}fIU7QxT(p|y%!fbv?9LjIP2rPw)^c0`dsj<3xL-@cWR$$MwL{#^HPtAFcxuxn9tK|6Sk+ z7(YFjM=3QwV>@TSr}L=2eQ@4D{?K(=b>5gQ@5CRThlqUcn9n~;94GDmv^zgzXUuGO zi6_Uy)_dkQ?=C_f^>+U3)?1sRSKkj1dHlKZe4zA>)b$zT9zAn*f2ZBAXZsTKkSDfD zoC{C7{jE6k3V%k;-)X07JQV&`$b2wtov5JhkIt4)B0sxEFkg8-a@k|&iJtGXtpr`| zRjUX4RVHM<-v%G!E%HP!$B${_0_Q!`#s$uIh%m(BYn3@kQ_SdnWxbSD@czs<7IUk43`+Fh%-}OGS z*wdK9d`tLK>V1%DNUpq*jQb#y-K=69{Li~MTHI2*RU+*8lN(w?w> z*i!3Cv*o4OGf?B;H2&lq$DM?_j+rLE5Hep5^S3s~^F&9D%d^=d`OWh*QP1NyeG6WaggI6ie%p3G*C9cO)Ca$20rKMBS;5i;LsfKSJ{x^pleX0ucB zEf&(>!=77deEN;cmpJhHLSLWTc6)!%7_UO-KR*q|XB@KsPZNB$o=N|jLtcsfyl&)k zXkq<@>qA6-&x6m6WiB#yhdnpeQ|tL`w<3SHBlz+ac}7 zGBMo@wofNyeWL(A9w+_6)~ok{u=%{dXXtGyz0D5<^OWO3-=SCXVl>C`AQiHX9X1~t z{x&$S(;nCRgkn$UGeP@HQ?5JPYFqXnd5!Pn0iix z@p0W>m3Su9{A{-T7yiK<=YOd=&gTZ&9?T2E?muVL`#2njT-QVPxT~)__4$YMLn7C= z^?R7(ON0HoqQ(>EL*g>SXZP1h{M9u@8w5`2q~^Ac3@eH3#29_Cjq zgg@*)ZBNbH*q>bTB~KU!Js#M0dw=+0C1@wxB?mqpC*zpifA#vB&FB67hR2hJ zvZoaCJ*uw59*J8=ue)L1;fkB^XVm>7j-O%tl`VqtA%EC9RU%~H1K0Jf*ppK80?H5D zZ?B=w!{iUMzc9!63`5Q@u6z*tTWUR>_Jpm=CFVG9O3ZQI*HHYNcZAJTa<{w3^RV^$ zp5kYJ35$P2&4U=9F#eK~KaD^8CZFrp&ztK0%QCTWZE)Nugk0xW!N=od+>ks;s5r1) zT=PNi*cszT*gQ|~3s4C;??r!Z?ALZxLdFBv{WyF4n|7Vac@!~hKGlF-j8jT|w~OuH z4Y9wY);Gu>wx35PWc&!r_kvo-rTnn`jj443^1J2*c08x$BjZR6i|6P%m8Uzo$M1N1 zWV=;!vNefXP8epaAIj+K5;`J;QhX-=_6KWA&_vCE#Y_{6Rc#wQu_Tw@x1wjQxR z7t+42`-u~OL$1SJ{Y&^G>N=MByvj_Web zkn!8~eH@9;NbS4Dd0*H%LRHD1cD@?SVLjiDzwW>6D}t{442ys3#$fz2A?KMs_;mc+ z>b~MMe=BM{oW>ssxt?(4r?gipq`!nc&s5*qJzj;)9}7eGcoJq$M71ybSC~BswcqTt ze2b{>XprCao{q$)r{vQf*Zf-YZSi%X`tGC7H|7N~aZ50-66*fT;&ulgj}y6*aY?NQ z(N0&K19nb%{+oJ;U1et@E!2Y72pDf%F>@U@2-0`o1PxqIO zI)5!5heMt}OsMB*Xus?F!qfH2T~J6&ApU*e5b=s{VEpI+N5DGv+3o@}8ydbgu&@!z zz|_X3TmbfgxlIhc3mgMWUoi9rFrGE#EU*krZEEOEU~)54&I7B!HgE`xZw`6DE^rJi zZDHygz~&cCIlZO9A~3d@*mY%l{X0V4%NPXYVD=q`qy1{Q&1U~*Se zp9l7Uk=-B{^%fKeE4~*_>>eIj?unz13$H3$_4Sy3D z-w$PAvSiA6U=`Q~roUzCyTHu;rrZNYzHQ1WU;$VIc7P*b@c_eL2X=v(MTTAiCJ!{_ zJa7n%A7toRU>O)K8+sbp24)X7^bRn0h$&ZqE#LqcJJi%?fF)o9*aJqezgh~|0gix) z!;PFAumWrW2f)~OpbuCAHh}RXOnnyE2SzJ~o(7hVH01`c2aFtL=qX?USOa!|>7xx_ z5m*Oyfn#9xyN0g~%pPOPWndH72S&eV>g&KRa12ZyYwGjB9xzfh^c=7PYyp$U;W%Iw z*ai-P@$VbH8n6RQA8+VI-~bpq!O%0n5^xBNpJ?i{z%pYKnm zFj_P8Ixu;PDK~&UVB}OoPXP2OAmw=ViO}Pae0MloH4oseD z$_-!-7^xe23RnR4fwdo+`VMdetege;zyUD!BSX&sOTY%O2aKEzy}$yn2J8Swz{EL* zKL;EDW9J%r71#z2ftmA6eH%Cg#v6v71(tzLU>_Jg-|(e@MPMD+1*R@Ad<9?)*a41! zi3<&14p;%UfCFIu$A+&8Yy*eD_)koI7T5uffQg?%4{!jCU1aD@U>_K58hQmd1|}~y z^gOT%Yy*eD_$7uf3oHYhz&;rQxQ{M%Sfu*YqJ@PYyDPRFu19pHTVB%`Sp95BaE#LqcyT|7`fT-rGN!s4cGyWfW=!3e;pXR)s!2+9x&1|^ct`O903!znfe^C0&D>X zz}W4EF9R$A8^9hga);qd0Xx7EF!2jhFW1fS$o$CQbI@5$F>KT_5dl8h|HfC+v*pS@9p&NH}dW{Yr#_g_sL&9BRpRH{Kx}_j?3D}+xNWe zkWz7*yHGzbf%@1Y^Pc#1@9u2#o$YSei1iuN=dQeMqUYi*e*Wu~ws`S$))!De+|t-_ z*?EWUURqH3veb(|Zii9Z#{YXA>@=weO6Zv{OQjB{dTL+3gT`I8IWa`H>K`7?NKP0JbM{Z(yG?1OIk{kOR3;}E^^ce?HA zzM{F8TLX+j0_f4LP5ujgw!Gi%fc^I0VwZ#WTXcY1PaX2k zIrLw-!k!A09y{muNq^P+-4#rG#~;+F-zZrLMr+S5_=_-S`I{i8U|DHYb7W-%Qd!h6BW7|)mFDVYoPw_8hr~$gfg>s0DM-FxrffZmqXkVnb zjq#_Y=!tijb{i>rAtYb&=m&|1egDNiwkMJHi96C>(S42noOPVgGg!wiS#*)dcoHd( z{<2?Ce*b7AzhTLl$j9@cJxyQ5$2j{hs3?Hu94rg`0eqPdGkic*S;l3;y?PL$&az3_u*IK zv0xk$A>&IA<7-aw*Fw%SG0f8{ioX*w9>?$;TPw)Fcs%0sf5^ARgOuO6(zIjS zk|TOMn7<7bJ^Bgvd9R22o$)7v?Vbzak8OwiSN!FW{+L65F9-Skc6@{JZ{m2ypW|fM zd7+;*{&s?TBg5s5{n3H%uf%_4v^z0^c|!`=2S#x|O#}PDD9$r!U=-tW8dwDmfpLsa zSzrU$+b2DPRFu1179^NFH@De@t6+FHWzr-w@x5 zxNTF~V>fT+yw@R%uSR8F=wFW(o;2~kc>L(4cW?8BE#xq{9<71y$)5cFdf_JXPhIE5 zo1`Gew@}aP(dTQKFK%_kc=7dS5B0nrJ^qOwtkrnsp5u7@2=%-kUFRpOMjp#%_3G!B z_A&FNM-ZId*S~wme=U0H8pvN<{}}4edGdq1Zm`<1J=8CeO`7j}j1Dz^6pnf44)YRH zi*|zkx*(fDCcKAr2^E53>EKocGOFslMs2 z+xtA-^;Mm!I#qS*oO^TcS;GJ8{9@dzxre{5KBs)(hC1%yr=9;T z%$Gu3X63QIvG6&UFP}bn&liS4L)=o3V_eSL`ph5exaUyL{Q3KakG+VlA-VP%pJxeK zmfwT54BKb)ySfH_KfUde$|Ya=N0_5t@hfic?p zv>mUa1(L@V=x3hRo<07qK*VuKc?0Ejj32$qULTo?jmk&k&t<6p)xDoP|1a)59Q z=L;M_-sF_fd14mkFA^)8JE-kUIBl4^N%<%`KyJ) zywLGvzkm6uyAPil=#fk64gH_1YI`}_EeNUbu?=TXk{m!wSEgX0Cqz2Cfb z-2ogEq&?ZsA4GdzeCQwFSpQvfw}<>x0&(~+lpnD1tC#)JyZdC8vw!{(<#%nFzxnAy zue#5cKZf$}ZFR-Ek6stu)t3Jb<=2;=eC+=8F@Le;_n`dhZFj%u{Jriv73H&eA7cOc z(SkX<=>AiAcD(<5?4@^aqWez)<&1N~@PF{l+=+huCj&m)e>$Ll_NZ4rw7UNDIQ$8{ z`i(tycxuUTJdu1&{q3LY9|_|}7v78hps^y?oD@F&5yZX>#z?jP~9-Tj>U^5A>y=V$Hf*FVZA z=XspWFXsRHn23J-q4mpppSb4VS@vDPQvbVA-ue2QiGTgVFTM`>(fy72|Kle! z-x|yR=f?B@N0)#0PhlV?_+PGXdV_EN8#&&0I-vi4({FWWnQ>L}JArcBZ^Aui z=lMSkwr3Bbv&#L-)W<3;caof zzIn#+Fb%%1ZvNxj^mrKg;dq`E!FSKQD-ZbPSrz46KY@0f6~+F^{C)C`v#a+@nOyQb z(SuwazhCY@Y3ar6t5P0%3Hg1o`+d`U%GT?&J^r z=I*}T^~E=H`}p@D7i?a&bi>H1{+00lhxHY|>gtQWf;{?kb%TvU<8tzR9J~~E z!Ojf$9}FJ;LC%3027mCMw0jKxm%+FB)aH+K&dl)rEa*+-zsQPQ>d^lfzNaVwUbz1c zUgPt#$a$~A&ieFtJ!tz^*yjj6yr)S6Ht_x+j^6=QJnuAd|H)x|XrsS%VP6FGiG5Ok zf$ujJeNg{v?-7Q4?Sa>qFMf8cMRj(HY!==<&G zE}eJ%J2Mvxljz+9+=SGB`idnB&N*}Gl4DjZUOa!|etINeKQU1Pz}lT*HNoZ@%fne1pnAMK$X*$157 zj;c@mm@N#0i!k^PXFnnJ5GNFwLAy_JUO@zMpnC;;ugn;F-@jd^M&Hq}PEGXq#kmT7 z^b_?>@q2AU)#oSQMLGSVJmcfNKHYw65}zpe85ct8WqcA!uk@Gdj;=ilhF(9_xBa~& z)}0!=z4}~#{xZ%B(){Aj;NS2f)aBBi)kj^vhTfQt!+;)$0jC`N3ow6^ia+E9*2ySb z{7qs%uDqe=u)mzK!|Pz52ulxQ9-z%D5Bs!R{x0^5v-H$Q{o_{pwYv{k{yf&q$gNez)$&^|53M}=YYpX$V;TFev<XsdVD;oC#FOvAEPvLgpAY)gYrMY`;%B~h{=#KThc|@5fAaho!S~SM)V;&! z=Dm*k#>t1=aKg{fzoufKo9B>;`j@X*u)t4$7J5$l*2iA?Z1jfV_ZGSTlt8!R!n#mG zm;xXD=Y5oT4dwQJ%=t!5l*2Eth;cBqj`N%J9QG5WUea4B|Mtxu>`!lDKItlYCf)y# zhn7E-^w*!8z|ZdqR!?~oe?2^h-ts4~Pk^QK9Cu6SIpvnl^TREj=Y(52&jYt~Z$iK0 zIoP&e^So=Tr#In#&+~*We`jz1xbeJS%io*Oe|i3?<>xu1mR^}K&huPI%g=KJEuH7h zS$Ylo&ssXqceC^q_Mf%%8rFNTKcc@(asI3sH&&Vd%YIE*Tz9NLP9-qUw_@m=uWa@6 z_ZeXea$O_e$9pMnz3KY=o=2i6H-1m?c_g9a<^Ip}*s_MsbJ2_*kLQh9I?vfMarJn9 zmF4HTP?pZ~jBNi%O=y3fD`fTX{2)s&VxE=N&vRcaKhJBibe?Ns={!e7)1{pT|ArSK z$A9Ku_Vu3+?`PfMc>7WhVQ_s{ZXxw>K4}DepnE)bBW373FN6BY&vPp*o#!Q3I?pq( zbe=D*t;(z%bArE|Y9OXt2|md^dWES>vy znfs#0?@N}S`%-DTjKe>WL>*j&S-dYU0G0u3fK9*-U>`7q_mokbz%t&W z)c~7-9l$DGP)4g{H1I7T8fEmC%UD0ZV{Yzy@F&um>2$@3I778ZZY~1grqo0b77wKyMc81B?MC0W*Mkz!G2; zumRWx>;VR6JG~LWIA97e3s?Xw1J(eWfE~a-U;U!w zLwF8~0ww^{fH}Y-U19&^mn-Vyh4}y{zd*6T!im-sCVl81)n~5{<6~! zUU>S#vkyGyoMoU3(DfCd_o(-ud&)-PTknzbf!&-e3z=8;_w*WPq*>irHc1wMf}e1f70=lARoc^md<|Ax2J;*ococ-`_=OP(2sf| zAA}yfrwPK&*tU+|!tYw~N!qUtzuSO9mw576 z2X@S=;e8qP?fTmJ40{>p>6wi_UTW(!V5d z>J>ThF9SO9vcknbt`F97YvW&C=@b7l=3Js1_kX1zb;~9G*>a(ae=X>tf5FYi{fh$E zc8Y%q&_$2nd4-FA+`oa}BZN=<~8EB6DSJ;Epc^L|0dcCBwQ-mW>N zPyDOn{z!d)-t(5Q=#)$H)|Lx>=pXdZzXovn*8xtwA}9XzRsF+ueXomyl#74d7evdg zjejYnPyCDHd4c-2`PYZ|(|PEhEf+h)zby37zY1{r*8onvA}9W|RsDj8-Z$7) zQ;`$@n74#%zv_F(+b;%vtalO=z2bip&uQeVJbKETQYM$QuPqn4_@6{QBmaSq{5N)p z+|Yl}iHEkD_J3f*D;y*U*-z=`n)hA%giOjKln0fAXJFCYQv)mJ40t5QF`U zLlrpV&;(AsA}4X^D8B^{N2cQ-dCvJ}T5j<7#D1K3-*_Ixl|J#WgndY;Z=a1GxnFFN zOZ>CtLKpv1&_n-EvJ7m=%IgE;PkHuT-z!BR8;+fw-qk_asMVQw>tlNTaCA0U+EM7y5{-z{)5;1 ztN0+7w4W^(y0l+t8y6?~mjq7#vcR>S;!go|(Ia?W;o=|nL(y_;<6m3p6aU)yJw|J>R@uLS7C^9mofALd(VxwY}Htn>}r&)i2}_~tj8 zQny^p^wQrpaQfRf^@^PM7uvzafp}8k(rz5=2zlS6Uz7Zq zM3;KR&s2PTTz&kneZJlp`f1BWPW;TmKKj`JPCq-q89$K|Kl{or!DBm4`z`It`Mev7 z050*L&r5`SK1yvn-mWR=W4$v$sY2qA!2V<8UwqcCPqTh$Z(A;9!#JQm#-RzEap)R* zL{9wnqSJm09#{CF^p$rCd(+>w^>c0crS4%|@IH=l*=?Kmjs5;fm~xSmxTN6^ zkt!x|fv6C4Sp-p%423?4{o=;Pkr(T*q1b4(>AUcS7OP-keX!_pnl*Up&~}y&cBe zI|F^JcTJ(xBk{;?Jsyu8pS<8eDU(a$VatUs@yMfI#-jtA@$hz?kpG~Io?-qgd|>-3 z``{Rib`JXs<^d0E99|b}A02(V9`+YgE=&@q9QSg^iL9s{T(Zf7;@}IuzqTwC}QZDhZY`TT&*M#L1QmUE)-Q ze~eRN_whJofZI6bK^Hv|x0=EwZ@53FmXrALy&56MoBU4WdDBw*#J?8y`=q`CtLLcTQ^w7T!aE@!iXdA?e1ZT!nAed1r$ zydT{D2e0bx9wp0A+tNI0x?d9Sidc{BPN2}%5#=n%(H_Xp{ z#_!*!{5tz_sY|Y5ewuQjOZ#P^hyGQ7)4v9AZKwFtR`m-W`oOqRX?>*i>tiRcL-@pB;)Ij@4SvwyU+Z@V^C3vzZ?ikDle*-RcDCh07r!IWPrq}( z>37N0FLL5{6?Ebqg^Pb|M?yZ2GH-3ZT3qx>{>I-i-k!mJg-0a}{j%jECw_VRxVX`; zByjqb1hRt*$@oR4J27+Rv5?UHojr zKKdDpJHP2?3OMzOocNgqop?pz;wOJk5?ViJ%FCI`rC#wngZVeK@6q-FWAis`xyXs% z4cJS+qx+8godiz3A}4-lKqp>Sxb#=fbJuc%zb8KD1$Q4GhwDn8_?O2#DC&FW`7ixm z>Xu8|)s_og{A)oE{R@6*+`lMr>J>ThF9AC7yu!sluGi6WYvW&8=^OfIp3~oZ)^~4_ zy5$=BXUc^x{?(v|{&j&fZ-e_ef3=rvY*ngN&ZZt zOFhH!=EU)FSLotL7WLDQ?1^qaTl&#JIpZU8;zwKAJ@jk;X}`peorQ655e7GNmLk4GWbr;ejrYM;rLvR>AL^0-pObcUP+F0Z&B4ENpOz7W;f zuAKWXaGwP3ix7i6_X*(o{Coy-_};{I@?8JU_3m89&UNLD1x~Jl->X~?9)_L*e&?03 zuAl3VJj1l$=bE15%41m1&UJrW=f`z@T*t?Ca9rOO#=NZ}zDEWTPp&KDx~nwa19M$f3cr(T zcz$W(y(rf|aa|MFF>zfH*X?jU4%gXm{Y(wt^|{_f(n#{Ri#!V+;POrAlD~Y8CggMH zVP`HmXW=s8@;u2`&Zo{D=;WK>Ki>S)6V}N|x#)S9{4ux)`JH8Yp7!*lY0+1Po;u)h zuWWYJO_yJPv*;L%bAeI53~Z zbPcbhDwp__k+*3@7d?!x2#KE340@Q)6{CmkM?LKs^f2$cMi2Wt^+XPGeopd>`5ptG z$cbOf7wXB*poje-Z}c#qsi!uR9^`w&=wUyjp8gDanE%0pr`vfDgH?VX<`KUJU=Vs! zfMviAU{vWF_8a79LeU5HOx!na2 zN`2yY7WCAc)BDT~?ZEu}+>$$o>ys<-_Wbpa`@n-DCwB0AG9jO@&RBNllGD^4ZNe}5 zDyXLcSP9(v;O(EkXbPRZ$$Dnwr#deVUZb%CiQ(TWhoa-y406+aR>pDZ(7^X{&gZK7y7^-FQ;%FxAe2F zeV(p<`*`Y-c4OR1kUQaqXaBC_R`aP};>PtHQm@3L>%*tx)K_+iom`(G@;WYDk3kz- zkPCgx#UlzB@~KaB$u-cwP8@u|y`sW(Tr#&~f7So~uLkSXaj8P?`J>NWtmD!IoieCr zit9iG7yrGFJG(WXj!OvTw3F*P1lMulIu7dTqW&o46M!?tC1vWXC|t*-kAAw{+xymp0^n^0$xPuk)o3I%VM36xW>yE^&z+w)(gvP!9Rg zIugNkT)1w8^@Smq2FwA@6qkajucdGumsZn_FH3*$(s8U);==nv4{~>W`^rD~-50vI z{bG1O-eKjzAJ_7s!(BXLfG@P-N2>e6>=fvUTV1={TligTRz#xV;+aD^bqZa^FRq6n zU)6_C_tQGcA@6ZLi{Lu$T))Emdh3E+ud`|n5X57kgEc|cyx1D*W8fBwx!wR{tDUBJUv+_IkT z55Xf>&2woNu4fTHCH@H?KHV-UlncMySGYb!aNRCkk3t)xkjnxV0B35KlButwaNRD6 zL)~-L%9DRSmvu_JFfLxo`M+SR5B`siO9XVvz^^H;gArW(Py6ucxMWcdd5`N_1lMul zIu_QKfLsBv3^-FV}+AGtnh- zV_c$;n}7AazteF^f=)X{ujDJ&*$6KF7kv11TuRC=89%vhM&xx|xK4)kWg%AuYyi#_ zmzJq7a-4r$Vm%j^aQ5pju}+<@3CJDx%U|E@m#?+;-G2Hn{bHlrw0s6~1;AfCv*=d8 ze2qNs>c4ikKmCW6uRyK=_?P!S{T1CV9ndKwag=u9`XIq2{^3tJzcrt3mnh01KU(i2 zxNaA&?-}WVTmmo+I8(c1O?`ER>wJyuIm{9P%F52??&_!gWEcFATXfU=DDmxD-r%Ersj26cCqB#A?e}r;bYx za_jfE8T(xjO0Vj#V##ieZO z>ndEwCG?Q%M|W=Zy(?L#j!W=(=l?UeA3OHmAqqNW;MZv1dcnp2j1QlVOAh6bAFWFg zT*rm$kXT<5az(%j;7oC;nfkmFoPScEjtkEL+yBTbi>y=P!rw~~$o+D&pDpqm-;)1u zasADHug}u*3CLvtpZHsEA2q(sE`Xlg)4hlLmme;CN&jA|pqx6zZplZkuM%A1+xFqp zaqprW@}u=pg6p_*JrsX0H7NHf7q>9rOmUBbkM-phuH)Xj!o}_3$A1x~k2>yU$o=fh zx90oBz3{S=f9~unPuB8v$h83<-Tk5qb=>=)XTRp;FT3=N7v$U7k6aB{lu74t5 z%7;(KJ%e)LmvMmWlmypt=ei`mPmV(_4_E@6Dee_hUr*sW?&%Ah-|e@)zEa1H`5rpS z`G5HhPp;z^_x6|F`}!x|zHb{XAA?*9aPEccb#>fxpeHVL^}qh-ubnIBU&$qLE1{e^ zg)aHdbw%WB`ta$vw^0uH(Rv`kb=%{%;56u40U&zf>XD1WazZ+h29uyP%gIclEFQ`#qbi zml11S+=Hk1=X(<0k;#|v;nQ(Xp|yN>(MO3J2o z?xWwi?Soz1uZ!p2spZ>{>jVCL)>&iE$Kg}``vcdXh~E-~lM_SW)A$YlW+e(C#1`Q>Z%x32!s+#fut<%^K30={@x zqNv-Y2|8sE*D0>I5nST$EnGFPb-RR64*Ajg8NqeCaJ>xc>!SWBI&C!$s#UucT0VNb?UgZA-7I;vLFN7;c_KFpcfx@`8xZzZy!G^B++p3%%Pk*g)aAd zt~(-M)rU{_(>lr_KUzN|xQ;v53(>|Bp-*hfn)mQ}xR8CD##&y!Jc4x3iDGV~db$0(Jmr^1Em1OPuBJ zcYkB&_t~G>_MQ6oOa}bcZ>~q8-(?>@?RQnxD}Hkwk@cJFhWLA?0J#QW8*nDSyQaSQ zr^oyrJzw$M)6d*^VV*wfewK#ZtGlebtzSPYUFPEU;W_P#w0s_NWx&_Zyz_46uNE;0gbIE03NY=2;(f)+uq6e#mtvY?s&~=eOq5?UFz_4bA3h!T7RniSu7eR=$DQk5I6hV(*QNYY7l)bR9s(ch%P4%{%PU(+!Qdh+B%R*! z#~iGE+`;Cd4t5T6FnxrBJ$%m(;yY{s-zUTPZWY7#ohH6#bnsrk&-dnde_6!)J`eA8 z@^~N8!~23Peg}H^oe;+JYz@zkO*}7k@Z6BbeIbQ$GKuk|gMQUV{^e9W2JPha<~hF# ziav9M%WuyUp2W}l3+IuMuMc~oXFI#BexCbEehbOZyyQ8$#K~Wrpx-m+ z>yn?4`uUxo{fqw8p|@-Fb5o`IEY}~&p9WuenZLgkv(B1!5Yisvxs#lJ;ueyh_4jd( zF8T7XqdLJJo(F5=NqOq$d*}@OWxU$Z8(i-1Z{(BC{+aZ%zQ&UA^G8W1q&?Kf`!mbS zu!A`HX>VjJXAj?ZWx?Mx_VYY&u7{w$IQaU8e@CfkaHTeI`q^KTh)?t!|M;Y_u8QZG zvmQdxsrxU#Q?uMc@-rVw*cXp{Mc7fFU=QcrvArorNd3fnIDe7tK{_G%X-@_F3K0*l zaB)cjlArNQywk;#@#(_uyy4$R1P51i9mmi9nFfE=@Y6n?gGSs!(W&Fl`NNivIQi*c z?h^ZNb6H-5Mo_ELgCY_M{v^RU; zcz!lvM}LAn4eVPzlYYjB`vbB5==sQhK-$A{z8|4|q!U{Hv^nRSe1znuKCZ7}c^!6i zC)m^7-^~jrzlGFKfBT1y$1{8Z@*j}=9M2jU&xsddN8a%7CW3>D^Fc@cpq;9Q{~*Wi z^>P2*9(W!7y>0j}ApeHWe*S)G0_nj0U(sTGd%KIJZgw#*}ytmvr zo-EJ8j`9S1!uz@3o4j9Aj*$9^+w*-%CnP`Z${Eo(Q z!u$mNd|yvK3$1>hZ@yd#1{e9;MnB_`#5#D|Uj<+AU&sCB^B30(P;V0aal^m8tKQ4K z;^M>p-bFiQ4L|kqJYnJ%idyN9w3p{GTfXK5{ai<9`H53M?}zE2v!BneedvuA#^XbI zt}h~PA@$S#-Yet%y$HROBR}!vcFrE+7FvFLe)1%K_V<#}--SKli^l!s^Cst$Qg0pn zNyE?fx92~n!Jjw$`->xki}T>v9%aP8YWP`y3BL!K-=q_YPCcIIKel$yw=sPGqQ2ng zTwLOSRzKINlixz}Gas_ppThE$C+IKFTeEy%{CJKt^*5onKS6(OfxEwu-$L3?I_Gh* zKGF%v&wR7zHK#9j@hk$8pW_ebD^WfQzPjP(xp|qxTztr%g`Zu+Px~79y}zdUllk1Z ze(E8l{j5KKs^e#SCqM7}%>$C3@;pD8{G=0-pXJ$Ye-(Z<4gc;=otIzF#h>GO z82o+1PkT!#$4}fsQLD$3TyM?#3*+P6Hf~S)3&?*!tDp16C_l*_<}cT$kiQPS-3j{b zIntB#Gv3{pv!D8tmpc0?XYCJRA03ukNPdnV1?;!T`ts0U1tdT9@SJDj7LuR(xUY%j z3l^OpueB#iXHTwB{%l%`huMI!ThM&JzxK9lE!{Bck{v*Y( z!PPzA*>kZ&y(sdaZ}_i7d2OZRKLB_e_uc4a2rqQ0b|H$cxAdKL7%p_f1}DZ2Q1>v!dv z8u=N;`>uxKlel*9p4rlQZkVMv@w>*-IbYe*Yj|!n^g!~9{_%=|o&jXM!oc%}?g1|u zdKZ3H4ZQ_=W1Q|WJ_*DV^^W3W>Gapo1CcBJ{R)B}2c%y;*pV8ikM@bM`V0R0NAnFW zf6a$q-&gsavk5+qFNBOkdQ+G8R)6ThA%jAWwe&j^TIaEb=CY_9`fT8TWGdzGLn0_}DM}-6LK8n|Aa{JNwcD(W_UD zgXC2R^aLRDhx&~@gLx1B`im3v=RmJ0{W>4`UA>NS#+{JyB+l>ZGqo4{FTbmkzePK~ zG~HjcJ^Ze2^Nsb>9zJ*TyLuXWW6+yX`lY>i|FZ4H`ff)ss4t9iu}$)!1$s=;<@s!{;q~I^`I!6gWE9^pk8yswrSp7d zLl0CS&v?_0BIxyT{ec|tmZDETe@`VKKYIT5u9KZL;uz?Fo=|k% zzc|k&jdJ!|LbeCbOB>lP#dhpt@{t#$@9#M21 zf6g0avwhHSJOw2wv+RBI;*i$`1#z(`As#$ z-&ghsKcDM3zp09NrN9@xZaSXA&*wVMZz{6CLN2ZN#os*UOIv^I;M31V!q4CThTr4w z|5fPt{cq@j@b&(A>wz8vWZrgRPjZ|-+TY6R&->`t?Zx>}CGaty2&G=#UYsA40e{uV zF%RQ-?zQ#=Z&=k|Z4c)YMZiZp2(3Mw-^Axe^2H%fem)0szEulxY{UMn;pbs1oX^$8 zeXa<(vf`I~;B%w#ceMYNrSrMb&;!x0ts0+!{y+%y1R&xZ=);cmINj@Q(hP-y$O0$(RKTAKHlouPweMa#A}{vwcT4!@G5xN{a55e2=jD^FI9AU(QD?fscL?vc34e z!Rl|%pr7**d#lke_OSnRK4k{{Rlwjkr}ISH&-s7MKiW-b+l$}BV$d6h-mKBj`7xXi znn1gD(XM5~zmrrnxHvyDhw-J1{@gVDhd6eR^P!V?zG&ip-Z%Vm`Z~Si38P^}+cay%MH-U$4nYLT{ zZ4LCOp_f5VjMKg7*8cq@2R>uxXx|H)$CU~E+&{$fw|w}=@^Wuy*P1@Za^7W^{(alU zMdz`!tNT9pk5RkweMAQQk|xrwd>>)yd>^6d)A=$hL3zGcu8->tG=ZDA1}dO;41W=L z-_UcwL)Gc_*YV@LPmZgM10n6K<9n@bpB(gRJGK5Y{#h#Zmh!{V5509uRR0#DJH^>7(~` zCZ41Bb(YTeb%q}3L9ex^4SMjq)9o&HHb9Sz(?{P)tbV@Fw)#_$&ni8--8nyab>A_h zUAV7?t+xrix?ZiH^MgC!V?GfwPncJn?^^(W8L$tC_8PtSvi78J^=U7skJ}(J%4}syUOzCC-C$9 z4a;Bk;n(rueB}oC7#BjeS7yHdeJS|;RqfaMIbS&fKI$c8Jefb7zgvPmZNNC>$xnIC zC+4_BIwASlzMS7|`O8K>+n4i?Gq58IzNX>dLMj?uoX=fF{|`g1Z}|Cq#rgVm-X|d! z{lVCHG8#AR{i_JRN&T1el`G(5TnNQxX)nfy^N$&yx{(up$>-LD@9^Qm&zpuGh}Tw) zkK8XJpr-&)Zy*RftLVCaaXxeb<+PiS@nQRNK6Jn2>>yv+=;!-s&WGkaf;QsVH2j<| z%lY4oXBGT?!#{lB8yLs+14ZP28toOmeLVkLm|tMxIohYt(u0%Ue?zbCFB1O>=&kX3 z14ZE7ak|I%NBX&Q*e_tGrS~>>`f{C68|37 zhnai`)O_sJao{}onVzHCY5)6R=trx@LF?zd_9*!1C!zJ1^V*xRy91bjJllo)`&)l2 z;M3m&wLP4-U7x`oj;oxf&VHSPTua#_`Z<4r>jc=Z3v8z!Pv?)e$HRN4HN7uzUUC-s z$T(&u=;u7|)wQqK!*P%E&UqgxL2qM%e$K1rdsx~-$o3`9dE_%amooo3kDSj%k)OCY zrU0p*?}a%Jp6%6x-37zHy$B92&inV!uVUb@8UBTieYDOY&2by!W5@762!5`sWP7Fg zzT~IV`7juhSDCk+Q03CUBWUlOqKn*isE082hT9h;@|J_Osk?^fQ8jW7CeCrNd#;1E zuQ(XL&B5Rg9rW&Wu<5z;#nT%(Si-rJ$;}+z-_ya?5qGzg=O{)mI=105_K>|k*o@SKC~%Ydu6 a$vNQh0LHU39L(P0;+1&L!K&hy5dVMkx0<>D literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3683f85 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@ +import CoreReader.Evidence + +namespace CoreReader.Choice +open CoreReader.Logic CoreReader.Evidence + +inductive StatusKind | name | convention | standing + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive MethodReason | output | explanation | applicability | simplicity | procedure + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Reason | status (kind : StatusKind) | method (kind : MethodReason) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- An implementation has observable behavior, a stated domain, an explanation formula and an execution trace. -/ +structure Implementation where + name : String + conventional : Bool + established : Bool + run : Nat → Nat + cost : Nat + domain : Nat → Prop + explanation : Nat → Nat + trace : Nat → List Nat + +/- An application selects relevant objectives and constraints; no universal ranking or score is prescribed. -/ +structure Requirements where + inputs : Nat → Prop + expected : Nat → Nat + budget : Nat + values : MethodReason → Prop + +/- These are explicit, content-based interpretations of possible method reasons in this application. -/ +def MethodContent (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : MethodReason → Prop + | .output => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.run x = req.expected x + | .explanation => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.explanation x = i.run x + | .applicability => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.domain x + | .simplicity => i.cost ≤ req.budget + | .procedure => ∀ x, req.inputs x → (i.trace x).getLast? = some (i.run x) + +/- The extra choice commitment requires both selected relevance and actual reason content; pure status supplies neither. -/ +def Relevant (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Reason → Prop + | .status _ => False + | .method kind => req.values kind ∧ MethodContent req i kind + +def Feasible (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Prop := + (∀ x, req.inputs x → i.run x = req.expected x) ∧ i.cost ≤ req.budget + +/- In this application, a relevant reason is eligible only after its stated output and budget requirements hold. -/ +def JustifiedChoice (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Prop := + Feasible req i ∧ ∃ reason ∈ reasons, Relevant req i reason + +/- This proves the structural effect of the adopted choice commitment for each of its three status-only cases. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +-/ +theorem statusOnlyFails (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (k : StatusKind) : + ¬ JustifiedChoice req i [.status k] := by + rintro ⟨_, reason, hr, hv⟩ + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst reason + exact hv + +def identityImpl : Implementation where + name := "Existing identity implementation" + conventional := true + established := true + run n := n + cost := 1 + domain _ := True + explanation n := n + trace n := [n] + +def successorImpl : Implementation where + name := "Successor implementation" + conventional := false + established := false + run n := n + 1 + cost := 2 + domain _ := True + explanation n := n + 1 + trace n := [n, n + 1] + +def changedOutsideZero : Implementation := + { identityImpl with + name := "Changed outside zero" + conventional := false + established := false + run := fun n => if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1 + explanation := fun n => if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1 + trace := fun n => [if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1] } + +def identityRequirements : Requirements where + inputs _ := True + expected n := n + budget := 1 + values _ := True + +def objectiveReason : List Reason := [.method .output] + +theorem identityOutputReason : Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .output) := by + exact ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩ + +theorem identityFeasible : Feasible identityRequirements identityImpl := + ⟨fun _ _ => rfl, by decide⟩ + +theorem identityJustified : JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason := + ⟨identityFeasible, .method .output, by simp [objectiveReason], identityOutputReason⟩ + +/- A conventional existing implementation can be selected for an actual requirement, not for status alone. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +-/ +theorem conventionWithReason : + identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ identityImpl.established = true ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .convention, .method .output] := by + exact ⟨rfl, rfl, identityFeasible, .method .output, by simp, identityOutputReason⟩ + +inductive Candidate | identity | successor + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def implementation : Candidate → Implementation + | .identity => identityImpl + | .successor => successorImpl + +/- Feasibility is decided by the same stated behavior and resource requirement for either candidate. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem singleFeasible : + (∀ candidate, Feasible identityRequirements (implementation candidate) ↔ candidate = .identity) ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason := by + constructor + · intro candidate + cases candidate + · simp [Feasible, identityRequirements, implementation, identityImpl] + · simp [Feasible, identityRequirements, implementation, successorImpl] + · exact identityJustified + +/- The same observed input can conceal a relevant difference at another input. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem localNotGlobal : + (∀ x, x = 0 → identityImpl.run x = changedOutsideZero.run x) ∧ + identityImpl.run 1 ≠ changedOutsideZero.run 1 := by + constructor + · intro x hx; subst x; rfl + · decide + +/- This candidate is cheap enough but misses the required identity output. -/ +def cheapSuccessor : Implementation := { successorImpl with cost := 1 } + +theorem eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient : + Relevant identityRequirements cheapSuccessor (.method .simplicity) ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] := by + refine ⟨⟨trivial, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h.1.1 0 trivial + cases bad + +/- Each of the four internal-method reasons is eligible because of its actual selected requirement and content. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem internalReasons : + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .explanation) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .applicability) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .simplicity) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .procedure) ∧ + (Relevant identityRequirements cheapSuccessor (.method .simplicity) ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity]) := by + exact ⟨⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => trivial⟩, + ⟨trivial, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient⟩ + +/- Openness about reasons does not make two actual behaviors identical or reject the existing implementation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem openNotEquivalent : + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason ∧ + identityImpl.run 0 ≠ successorImpl.run 0 := by + exact ⟨identityJustified, by decide⟩ + +/- A priority interpretation chooses one of the same two actual implementations. -/ +def priorityClaim : Claim Candidate := fun selected => selected = .identity + +def statusFacts : Theory Candidate := union + (singleton (fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true)) + (singleton (fun _ => identityImpl.established = true)) + +/- Both interpretations have exactly the same true conventional and established status facts. -/ +theorem statusFactsModel (selected : Candidate) : Models statusFacts selected := by + exact (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩ + +def priorityArticulation : Articulation Candidate := + ⟨["priority", "conventional use", "established status"], statusFacts, + [fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true, fun _ => identityImpl.established = true], + fun _ => True⟩ + +/- This procedure reports whether the actual status premises entail that very priority claim over its stated two-candidate scope. -/ +def AssessmentAccurate (report : Bool) : Prop := + report = true ↔ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim + +theorem statusDoesNotEntailPriority : ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim := by + intro h + have bad := h .successor (statusFactsModel .successor) + cases bad + +theorem statusAssessmentNonEntailment : + Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusFacts selected) ∧ + priorityClaim .identity ∧ ¬ priorityClaim .successor ∧ + ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .standing] := by + refine ⟨⟨by simp [priorityArticulation], by simp [priorityArticulation]⟩, + ⟨(by intro h; cases h), (fun h => False.elim (statusDoesNotEntailPriority h))⟩, + statusFactsModel, rfl, (by intro h; cases h), statusDoesNotEntailPriority, + statusOnlyFails _ _ _⟩ + +/- An assessment identifies the exact premises and priority question whose entailment it reports. -/ +structure PriorityAssessment where + premises : Theory Candidate + question : Claim Candidate + report : Bool +/- Accuracy concerns the actual reported entailment question, independently of a later choice policy. -/ +def PriorityAssessment.accurate (assessment : PriorityAssessment) : Prop := + assessment.report = true ↔ Entails assessment.premises assessment.question +/- Both policies receive this same correctly negative status-only priority audit. -/ +def statusPriorityAudit : PriorityAssessment := ⟨statusFacts, priorityClaim, false⟩ +/- Priority reasons are a policy component independent of the assessment's report and objects. -/ +structure ChoicePolicy where + selected : Candidate + priorityReasons : List Reason + assessment : PriorityAssessment +/- This is completion of the specified assessment procedure only, not full compliance with philosophical Grounds. -/ +def GeneralAssessmentFulfilled (policy : ChoicePolicy) : Prop := + Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ policy.assessment = statusPriorityAudit ∧ policy.assessment.accurate +/- The additional choice norm separately tests the reasons actually used to prioritize the selected implementation. -/ +def AdditionalChoiceNorm (policy : ChoicePolicy) : Prop := + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements (implementation policy.selected) policy.priorityReasons +/- This policy retains status alone as its priority reason despite receiving the correctly negative status audit. -/ +def statusPriorityPolicy : ChoicePolicy := ⟨.identity, [.status .standing], statusPriorityAudit⟩ +/- This policy selects the same implementation using its actual relevant output reason after the same audit. -/ +def outputPriorityPolicy : ChoicePolicy := ⟨.identity, objectiveReason, statusPriorityAudit⟩ +/- The shared negative result is mathematically accurate for its actual status premises and question. -/ +theorem statusPriorityAuditAccurate : statusPriorityAudit.accurate := by + constructor + · intro h; cases h + · intro h; exact False.elim (statusDoesNotEntailPriority h) +/- These independently variable policies share facts, selected implementation and completed audit, but differ on the extra choice norm. -/ +def PolicyIndependenceExample : Prop := + statusPriorityPolicy.selected = outputPriorityPolicy.selected ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment = outputPriorityPolicy.assessment ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.premises = statusFacts ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.question = priorityClaim ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.report = false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.premises selected) ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.priorityReasons ≠ outputPriorityPolicy.priorityReasons ∧ + GeneralAssessmentFulfilled statusPriorityPolicy ∧ GeneralAssessmentFulfilled outputPriorityPolicy ∧ + ¬ AdditionalChoiceNorm statusPriorityPolicy ∧ AdditionalChoiceNorm outputPriorityPolicy +/- Changing the actual priority reasons changes choice compliance while the accurate audit remains identical. -/ +theorem policyIndependenceExample : PolicyIndependenceExample := by + have articulated : Articulated priorityArticulation := + ⟨by simp [priorityArticulation], by simp [priorityArticulation]⟩ + refine ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,statusFactsModel,?_, + ⟨articulated,rfl,statusPriorityAuditAccurate⟩, + ⟨articulated,rfl,statusPriorityAuditAccurate⟩,?_,?_⟩ + · decide + · exact statusOnlyFails identityRequirements identityImpl .standing + · exact identityJustified + +/- A correctly articulated, completed negative assessment does not enforce the additional selection rule. +This is only independence from represented assessment procedures: keeping this unsupported priority would fail general support proportionality too. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem generalGroundsNotChoice : + (Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusFacts selected) ∧ + priorityClaim .identity ∧ ¬ priorityClaim .successor ∧ + ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .standing]) ∧ + PolicyIndependenceExample := + ⟨statusAssessmentNonEntailment, policyIndependenceExample⟩ + +end CoreReader.Choice diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.olean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.olean new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1bb050d557b64299718d30d093b44c2576287f9 GIT binary patch literal 582952 zcmb4s34BcF_x>cAEcUU-9#lmYu?MY=wV}nJh^-P45{)F1AZQtCNi7v>35ro#p_ZT} zt);1=K~<;{sugRarJ}W@miB+oeV=D?Gojz#|N4BK%=?^k-gC}--u2$O6B8948tv}Z zqH*))jhmXDeFZjc6WFxX@Mhrwq0NVnY!T2hbYzQ`q2VpVT8EBo)}l?*5rHFH4i67+ zWillkn?KfM%DeiuPDP`e$@I4;RFj(Vxm$E(0{%4lncUqpUi}Jzo|KU#cV=FwSyc*s zHBCt<7p1%kmlpuqUw@YX6KQdL?i3Rj-X}bCM0gyvm`uj{vr$i(3j=*e+&GmbT%xZS z*hzixxy$&-5#iBc;rOT%(dXl);^7Zk{o#w%r_>A07Y4CA80AKPw0iD)KoMyw?8yL4 zq@2blc6o!J)C-?GMZ`qXDx*Cakgx2o*>`kMbz%Q6JzA{dW1^K((US{#A9v;7h1w_I zf3ITBW9ni3q-^)N@UUJ`V-h_9khg)_8@P?FxTgGD)WdcoW&8C_2u&Cl|5{}92xXJ} zZ?r1~`W_CuIi_q4a|P<79i+^|=+H6Fwi7*>kk18e5clKA$zAi`pq`TQhjx+DzWB&V z;k`xuH1>6|FAaLKXy4A1>uXn6oJf82la&5O$8?H`9yu=F zX`CitjGv!b`EA|fyPoX=bP58|4Se9IWjuF&^%&? z9tY^x>-TNBcVp@*>Z=H6Nc90iD~n|d$0bCDjf*n$y29;|N54;QY`d>~cfH%XY5kb` zNU68O2rXl@P7)fWBG5A?u5dize~>rg*{@{%ov*G7H!dyGD6nbny3Xb&mJIin`g zLnfAevwwni)SwKBpPmsF9hB0s94~>W(&Ih^B^M0ENbNhBWv5R^*-jFgchmF+w zjP74yeU{=XP642o8t(l)Kj*fd4iYcQld>J+$AyK3$H&JQmT9_ujF%nyKFWG7q{oijyzyk@>k;DzJC^;2L86_@A#s&>Cy(hxl!Qg1BExh`^FdVEx$PrAKI|5zU> z>+RsIugLVI$Bp%-L4QZDVU|^;_I41xQZMs|>wwGqOS+wWcx@Z&wa6dZMauO`%<$3S zVF{7rWl_zAqUd9N{w0;49s7>o@YA2;M~M!JAKQnN?KC20OlYJ&`W4Q{MChp-G;Y+A zcPGC_J)EaVncv!aQ&{xN7}pHy$=Mq|$o;LU!th`A#D&Mk#2NC2?c-BQ`BisS%$qA!^^6i{jCw@IbIO&JbHPv zW7+G63NHS0d?4kx*e5(He0->}w<&v>hiS0)VE4IOEls+-@W1rQ_}ay=_Mv?oe@tbR z{|65|+4G9y(OKe*5Bt$`R|5L~+_JwOUa_D3m9(q~YM0E1eZpho{@1)7i+Vk?AJ{B4 zCTtK{(aZ6Gl=`Xnf9;zxq4)D$WddKnzTP=+a9$;4Khyd}oYXCsw5!RY;^7DS{n6<; z-^YKQF1Xmob|PiJ9}}7o7BNiiN<>c(t*A+rvCd zqaOS9-T!nO6d-zxdB}aJTW#ZG`i68P}j$P=37?9p-bsr z>pJGUoufXEo1`2+x$acMXS}fM`Zyj(K;QHB1fTLX{hZ?f^PiM)#kxfWRM)2Taov&* zeO=#}w7quUbJK;zO=}3o?f7@&oT;jm_fV7GL+T{}G zr*+ptagIg(UB5Z|S>DfyvqXo~&phOM^6;LoSN;(({UULWPn-uw-Lbs<;`BrMup#ms z-?;vmeQDH9cl-W9lxMqeeb{t&w`q-^9I+7(sDN<*`|Mw9551A&{=sR%#ec5RgA)fs82AE~7m@6_vk}?woz{cd6gU3oiONE|GHF3?GZZ4tfG19}HUm zOIy8bTbC}T9_BYG^L&hcZXjIB9_G0NddglJ_t*aMm9G=eL^<h@`hTt;BKN0$aOd$_GwtG0^&-stkInQFB+kISoLgdKE zLIaOcZ#MKM`Stv6$GdgbO4VXF^MjOm!g0J)RH*a7#HcTzvWi3I`VTj+=ukgI^a;-K zg8j|s$-M4aDa)PXJm(!!uFpc9>wVFrE~7pN>hu3`$LF2rr34Fy*w6MOWjh+q^WK;k ztD-IXIG*G|U()>I5q^WS9*I7|xgO?vCwKqN-tBtzakc};Q&Q$}Sg5u?!ilix;kXjw ztKt-NqFBlI7hF5WdN}T~|2Bw-DRp7#FK37|jvUt-v^ezs&)rypt-B>mydjVF6GmKbG^9v zn(viQ7F^g&JR3OIYkQXZEz4^9Q4;Zd;Eea_$=!POaNn?txNlYEKgX>jn_l1Bs@|o# z#F-bICn~*Jr`tzW*Er)740)alM9yCR^VN$136$qNLcDv9`Fe)?X?@M9#q62q2HLSr zSonx>ajxS9^Ee&#zBTXup#?K$>*JfmGne*YzdxtNh88vI#yIns<1VSE7^+>7(W48U zH|1cR;a^R~XHLYYxBr|NrZ20c9AmZs{;&rSE+Tyh^bFHvO05B4)s_P2O#pZ2u%9{X=F^mX6ev3F9Hp9fMO z#|=`pLu9metfQ9Ay1yJpQlV$A&+5mvgkWdhJM#|hJU6jxc*VL)8cRLm7w1v#@8;Hs znd`oFmL48s`*EE4^n8_;!>tQ0(@wSpKVZO`f-5=-iy=`xDPXIrHJuUx(lS_>JOwh%;ZfPI&R{cC|A% zPrXi@{hIi9$$t)VOR>E|obh+y{4mOMc#ZJUt5O9Qe;5x^&THY?!hLvDWPF5SMmEMf zwx)_t)cCCv%I79H{c+ZZbNS7c`e#KXN9*H^)W>;_l=Ge1C-jPrn%FfoGOA$T#r~9o z`fe|MXX5Y{6T8!X&cCG0Z|#1>nAl-W3l?{pfY@)TrR)v>eSL6!_rER|vx`1sdoka( z_*PqX{?dS5f{XpEhm`dt#B?fjmP~!jCkN`g^_?x}W;uJ2^*!h7Qe$dQdbjWR2b5<# zIX)dPb>-%JSN#vt91~NqF>@C;~LiOfnlW&gQ5-BWF4{@#|<~KRff85_UFA!({pnpB1Fa9w3#OJxL zxC8mLEq~9VTW8JAeB<~{{U>Jp_Q&L(Z2IzE{9yZ#a@@myvbog5OYG&k##UR!rPq6{ z#^(6Gs}FO={9u2&z5Ve4&%q}?5FJt<*UzN-z@cI4PTT)|9i74YKl$vz`Qx^1(J%D} zn^y|uRE^&P0I6EZC(@>{nGu!ylAbX{Jgz$@Sfr2cApW3|3loG zDNX8sW89Lc&tvYXTfMCMd9E>T+y`3{KI^l)>Ro*t65J2>aRM+8*!*W*d-b_(4QWqJ zR7hF_pH-e09OL$kiSDA^q>qd;9QBKS=DTlQ9>&gW*XYf^ zE>00#;=%nfDf=7O0loD58HPi5=w-brs5kaptu^t3>pAy%ynjo-lh+P8l$yR~iPS50 z`Qttx+uO3K-cSE@nHw*-*u{B`l;e28d2wiz@X96n*k1ykQ*j7r_I2bh)hg=CGr`$k z+249!y;1qAF#C9s|F1X{9&es~U)h0r$J+gSFP^ddCECUKa~^N{&htA4g}kGztfoX0K5d#(e<{&HopZT+TS zMPBUTJW0y^t~_4wU(coZKCk>gbLXq0C%sSV;-Zh^IVr~r?L5TUx5e%t$VY&Vec`?A z?zY-T>6bHKu)Zk!L(5l}rcTnsWsEb&=Vl`+?%4Iwjz8!Z`xB{azxrR#q2$4?$z{9z z5q|I82-@XeU-`{=FUlMD&B4}H9uueCS%~|N{Fl;Z9c+4tcmVECuwS0aY58`1(#xU5 znLnJ@Po?~`COx{nJ}gOmnKz`&pLp%IP=agx!li?{|9ooEP^CkKj4D zU*xoB=GrUPztf%PugnWl=0{XaSZI{CU3fJrW;jOz(Z_rZ^jC2@b?E2xu>K33^Cr({ zNV#59{k&^vSVDY{m=WR5v4wV0Z<15*z_-_}U$vSz*Q*?7%eC$M$J|%y4I|FDay@aX zXQz#yy?ymKao&&Oe(ukh9cz=HoAe@at|us8J}~m)mhj)k5@)+}eb@KJ8D}G6UvSQ^ zYu0{lmpap^Sz6C7f=gboeMs3(VG-e> zv3(2QWH+``P6O3WJGa-l|G}59M6*7Qo7}JbwS8Ub5_4}QcrB}WqQQad&VI)6gZ=QY$yLtv zxPPS{<$12ab;#+o#OHqg^3g`(JSQcdFt(Qa2UP;E5$F1t^F{@)`1rFg4h_t z)jvLT?1tluhzH^R3+-R>Z^>g9e!jU*aA_}&OQam13g*`VkqHscp7)a*s&-ql?bqbp z35VQSZz}HZ@w{jCh@eg*qr#kcF64OL^ZD7HVc&NM{F?G?SGN0)m2VXLDB$lq#MzJ7 zu9Y6U&--oJull}H{PGk=?IPv)9~M*i`7P#0#EZ(0{^7TF9ErZyS7ar>ob@0-`hV_m zBlTX#9Kod?j(?;a2gi=nc9@0kW-EOhAF@#2t}%Tk?8&sWjM^)#ukRHR)l_iLVZ z+g7)iiM_I~XTN|&t=KTztB`q^(u*?)Pz#Fz=j{_B9= zR+|pAsT_3v3(+Sy$0M#omUf@+J*Dx)Ev%2@E-CAEo|ix49LUmG`M1j}<94x(68iWi z_E#6h+C^GTeZ+pTb4<9LEvXeWH;>>@_A-7U(0_l^!unxvx4$Gz#(d!T-a5N}$HQ>{xAD>>Iub}v=V^V#a&H*Y7@%zU19mk@;_CX^O4}wg{D zS(pT;Kg@&lzE!QI*S>yBaH)^uDJjQQ^;{TJ@7eo^T-2L><;mK=`&@Cxf#W^*=M(+P z3wJYYM1G1!#s z_qXqBqF>@#PX5p?Qs!xlcKc3xw)Rx__|T|AkHHmcPir&Po^6w71{d$SXRYWm`kjUR zT4CA$_mXBeW)Kg;c>%g3bReDvIrgiE>wRXtP-^);;yeeXU+0f!{L<-K z>RZIqaDScpANHSdeaiX;L4vz!e)Alfl;>8Ov)W7}T*?oQFM-XKpAV0oo3Oe?uU5o) z9?kZz`pU>X4NfgwK%DX%uiFLguky>2Zik6;d}99nw0`H1@0wKZQUpi-RD1Jo!sgN& z8WDH4FYf=g8{`PB-~9U!;=C`y{2JWzmGPyfmJ?eU=ZFEo3FYWN0{GnZ>`VA=U zv-aHjDA_l6D|CNa%gDatMvl~;k2hwd)WdluqlIdxw?kVkd+xQcG|?^fnB@=cBIP+( z+&Fz{tYf;p$UFa*&@=tv-7PCVdO;WjXM3|ftN+xe(ZEvO^!_9`*Ed{ez0~g3gtqN| z*M~>Jxqf84_f9z5@cyYswW*)uAm^*0eQv)ITW8yC;>;)ZiyF&rZT)gqFFl{c&+@{k zU8L;SVG*IxqryjM$4>Fu)H5hNE=KXm|6&*8XKAJU9=bDde2Llg6T&Q(rdp zwa*!!_1b4qk-{T5?Pt5KUK~66^q4=wiF2GL{$|> zh!R}v<+_fvlmObLo`=!CYm-orvBr2OwN~+N9~W@pY{1RmL`L+Lkw3JHlzQW}dqz>= zg;xzmec8}g^U8;Hp1*O=xld(YavqtoXK=*WNx?^?4v}~653r6|z3f8vNA2R96HmkV z!g1u6cGl{3EI;eZYLVwUnB(og{@eQamObWNXR+Tfe=b(~y?VnB_x>&VHGl6vkw3JH zG!b@$pg)@MJdzDG7c>apX9>Xgm<7snP&>{;tvoNrzQYch2^s?b=%+89vrY!h1@+;1 zI;aCQ7c`)hYR_a)?ss`kV8c04ENC)l4rl=Od7Src_{{xZGM%W`X8`T5w-10yGUYi=W{)_bquS4?-STa33fD)DG$Z zHQ{~>?`!(ua|CEQXf|j*XmDMX*Ze+CB0gt<=7CypULOK#2h9fMdO07TgK*9r0h$e( z51RbEsy7Xk>+vjn4#N3o1ZWayDri2aFU}VuKr=vdKurx)J$|58&=62ND4&ma;ByA3 zG!xY4MP-LSXb@;JXd0*q z`v#u3+3}gaN5d^Ta->IZ5C4FR=-IzWA}KIOW_hR?B}T<;{~Gw&y*;d2&f9%vBO zO%b5!pgygYe>`9G$LAo>2+(v;pFqX$4;lm-0h$Dw3MzBHtatQ-Ozm${txUhhfeMjz z2Fo+8uxrPIJ0o8huvKth4bMY4`J`O?`Kdt!E>!H1NI@e{i zkCgQ!C>2HY#6r*Hs}189O&Q!0^_bail<#*wJeVr9_Y0WmM}^48D_ECS?vV|Bn`5_} zGGUP&VDj)zL3ui89%%Na@hjZ87)J%hIP$srcZOycxlE?j2PPtEjpFms(kxyT9CmKx<) z{_uyp75Jq#%^uHe*pUyKQnTuAHypYNo`G^pCuMKnsio_?qh5)l9k>HD0DOIVMfrR9 z(E>${{`0x*X4Ss?Jz{QnvT$g)nd>;(`>XZXerl2TNbvljaj(Bynyd;DInI-mtA1pk zer6;b;zu^@qMs*w@3a;2lQ`(%#N&(Its-sG!ffypxNm0_k3L)Pd3qooid)r}0Y1jB zYme7r+^mX2*9SZhdLlqKo9Fa4yXX`CK*ZMuxg_xK@!1gV>BpK2^thYtChj*Zkn`=L;vu+>?mjawtjzmwp);BRqqkuImF19noiRU(Jzs6P!9C>=IgBPkki{A&V|ApVRy#m31Z)nriUjF1%RQO%n zD+2tt>TS8=?OT-JwY^fn-}_YEOFlk@+e_Mm?PY9_0PS=q2!3Zmp7G7cXCuGG~Hdua_n_JB&?aP#osv(*&x55UU+`7`(Nqb)6x316aTF2wn0obu{#C)Mmscp z=0udIfnHs7`U6Hu?Be)KO8c~LrIW3YUAfS+^5=^YZA*RU9FHwQ%3s#sqJ9m14=+k2 zuQDMQ0KP-Zi>H!TqtBd2`|9scQKlH<6AL{Z_TO#v@xhm!=Tsc`NO}IMUUO2QCk689 zpv#U2{oN+0!l$s;oP%=4?VX-$rzvUWkExsTm*e^0J&*OHKN5HDmspllw;7LaOcD=2 z$Xh|*KfLrhb3&K*C>+nmJ3BNp)*k{nJLtC!zNyK!6a6;W?*P8L=?ngBW6h>#K3CaG z-ba9nG(FCI%YmNRcRq>wEBouah?AR7cV#D^b8wGpTW3VmX8QS%Buh<{La`;hf=AT2TL+fAK$Xak|{i2uy{Noxv)(f0ZG9gEMXSb_)nD#1eiHp_} z=ECip>rx-jaTu4hJK^mqZ=ApWZ}qu*2KG?(1%v+CX;wAnue1|w%yn0MZ`}WFdg$@w zK2oQKJ$qbDh;x2Rz^Eq^^>|GW^l1<=tD)$TIOd_8^<}-X`hZ|^8Rhvr=Z&MUM2?+u zZ@A!M2XmB^ZQU^@rcmBdzpbb8=i!Tov(vx%b_eP)C!(BuWqofH7fddr9sFLvlX>L^ zjQets{`D0j&igR80;2ox_|B}4XJRK~OUimeRTV|*$%j1;Y+)0-*FNSvw`ZRvrM_X- z0!3nvUoYjS6|`BIk2=0T^`C!*OYEU@q`VI@j9;)UP-hZ-5zvza`tbb4J>_$v_4`Po zkMSpEI}D4MsNa(ib)qL7^4XwWzbyX!lNT$@1@3OLDZ4eD`gP)T%b>$o-1Miw>wUYM*EY2XMwJsdG0aWU(Qo_ztldaS!I)5Ns3*0;J5Ts z_0G6o_m+nNj|J{eeB@%QmjSl{4+7q<*{a^&2AqDU!0)ARz4iuu5WhJe((i5FGfexo zeEEx5sNv>R=%viMZ@gT{66sQ zC+9p2cm!}i;A#l1#+y{4!QhAkNRR9&j8H?U+I5RuarW2DsFwf?3K^?6Eqk6Z(ptdPw5bH z7U)j~UnZz;u!_T-A2P<3u@&Wy1s~%d1pe|Z7Ob#Xi}GiqUsxfR2>zUYYx ze)gwS@W1r^_A2H4it-1z@MnYHw_f1!@|L3fsaPj-obnl{{2f^3X!{C<*`@tGlfWMc zKEL?+Z}3?}!6Q)4^SDFbof%vS^-BA>?q8C?U$t|++xnu{P^ZkRuKO2(<$TK*cBDd{ zb6Yk(Ge3o2&bRVVE}u2*nd@f#fk9!?F3lfje+U?);_^w<-mT+eql1VCqnzvEv;F}; zR($T~--ssy=ld0YcdU7QYi8q1#8ZIt{R$Ng47U2`vR_jKTmc1+Ocwu_G%{_*j) z96;2OghcOa;${Tn5g6 z?_B%spu3-{L~x&>%1`!Bzm4;L^Z+jH$aqqxNNRFs=kpbiZ{PgpHO5=?hM=6|`in=J zhx2@2a656F!&iT6`I8UyVEmeX=0N2i{}+Bc_!*}h z@E_}3zqqHr-nL}d&s73l_$_a$I1Q=uOB*lWqWl@iyL?b9_;=RayYOlERrtJ?9sIH2 z7b7G;I5d-T{bqQdO_%6#V|1Ifcsj?W4CuMr{@ktbb^G+Q8)-+LuLr?z5j2)thAID~ zTyJ0K@kjX&*>R7I?Q2Cjl@{LLsXmsL8mXe`kT2x-ZL2G%=?UC)lYf`DGgG8B5~xs^_2$eybO2>apZk? zySI9I8}M}C?5~|)dLh{dxXh=n{URIun>ti~SgdHj@N(@J`QT5_p1Q2Ke~~=*a_txX zp(-AqKk)dfMA3fX<=QWT!N0)swxgs^Vf~Vi>=%r`L{8>+2l6oq@|@q(@!7~P^LrM` zMP9?6xv$sW+cHvk%qzWyr)=+BA@F5^rf%32=@jbI&B*cviH`L?Yr~8L1e=FTP zP(8iaSiA6uoi>!S?vN|5>@vuE`T&mw4QexSi8Hq}JCk5vGVlv=QycMoMeJldkg`2q zj~NvihKe*hoWDN=)>iwXLDUeTisIr>G)^|AV@Uc8Qpo_xsrj#U0mSeE$7 z^%<3}34{1+MLGR_y-h%hE)1N{_Yt4@Lw1e<_Y8r&9rV&Kr%sbs^z->LmbIJS?>VD< z2ISc8hd%AmioBY_&nI<)!EHmo&8>RfF{v)*qjwi3^HvzYT z9$CKb6JvX(A$}piJw}f`$u`sEo%iSXeU68D>D!v!Th&`^knxFi@jjH4i`@?B%K+Wq z?T2W=kdzz0^B_tcr_`|uALVihiBA1_N)9Y_Hn<>{pp(r z&Tg7AZRQ5zzLACfYy4|X|BJ! zO!-9M^zYMt56qL&{u~cE4!vQWe!;TU3utN`9SB{6`M+WWer0o4_*_YQntxAL7 z9B(r^D!jz#nTz=Rn&3H*H@&6s8z)=d_cF-)p`39@v4!mQ25#JcS;5DC{_TeD_kF;p ztWoPCu1f<^ZwTbpfB&#Yu>f)^D(l#6<_Tyr_@6wi*1ou3QT}}7J^OtI_`lqC@n{LO zKc&QfU-0LF@A;_i;Ux`u;uodj!aNCY{v^GW0k;BYo^`(Zw!L%#?nZyv&$iFZt9PRH zN`0-U)$eA9Jjapw)@k|8H(B)~Ho+ah+0Vw5zP>ZE*@4>PgND0j0B1j|921=!v+_s% znI)0Wp?x^tsXp_=@pJZkvKI1grZLJtp6}#(HoclPZ%lRS_XA!_3bd>2qq{dAy!|)( zv9q6W96kNvlutSSYq|f-`MPUpRD8HnDSkNni5>M_nUuD@*|rpYY!o~d<@|nC^SD;c z{6B2pL{w!YXxZ zewuA4=X`y(>MxfClS|?d3!HIUzv%XI%^v;IaOe7x-}k+pF=J@#zn$&EAo|lFPnlCA z*0Gs%{mH;ijG^hc7M#Rz2|9X zFv@A??)UPYN5~Qf3-CnH$z5am8OQY$lyh8(TlLx`&w_EqGav1m4!*Z0Eosd0P{vIw z+CKy|8+`Y(DlU22I2gil0(|F3H7{PqP+tVetW09r9j?| z^BkYU`t0bHM&DhW+JNy&qI`FyC)&-IDXF(>Dsaw&8?N^BFvcqrIOElL*R1Wvctrru z1--NF`dejTpTvvfH1+$$DLX>_b0#V`_65o0r$*+e#WWJjvfPzak2#|yK=zyN`(bKxTD=Q`<&k|5S`k6gJOOO zivN7-_QS?{OehZkZLxcY#ju`q&R^-CO1{tVt_}LUy?>$T(Avw)?_bf6f%}tq%S3SJ z_b!s4|J1a{QEmas0*PA$%2Pr4{ehQ;SE<17XV6~ZXFdmkKNEDj-MfO>kDLYiUE3ue z{1x8p7stG!l<4R4=*fty|2XBhJ@K;?FKtszKSf5)YxwodzHT<_-r=XyRZ>f3r|67B0g&E25)U>TRPI~2|vk=EqQ8Q{+W?OA$Rt}&mOM@fiN>ECbqyIDnAwNpOi zd=r)aiWz4P81pF*n$A zthJ@{l5^uE^fUj7DsF7wV0;}G9}z_Pr;^}DftzBlUlxl=1b8n0c&`U55@zi8h}?bDpml=^MJ zS^wW_r*&mr8hz${Z|5MR;^6E*$?zN0|tGrv1V% z`Cv!6e3p1|k|fnPgc{c28NXx7-<{5Yo<7Hu7QB04{(!Iw}7YZIt}sdox%T0Dj23Q9tvi+=;Uf&U|uq1M80kKjk}>tgN>w>rZy6f6|3b z!^o@AXUyyYD0v6X+Jlj|B^61>O|T#82Y3@)>%pTyk@O>2dtD!{|Q8S3h{f9 zpEDoD|FXiUU8MR%pnWcQe`IKs-#F*dg3c@TXSvkxGe!9~f9inubSCXTWBtCs%@q#E z8SCd7pOkw8!~6aH)H~j&Rpqq}`lM9%AD_={UH#PhQ-C+0{`y2?{oF&4vOh&fMmZ}i z)c(*jXz8r63!mTeNSHL-oR4z0e^~WtL#aUG;5)T&`)|IP;k<7tcpBsb!PoJf#v!yt z@BrY!z&%T4b)(I?JlZ1>c(ncI5lTU~cz&Syx0%4*P1BTLmooQ$E@g9H?{YTyZu0w-_XEyz`n)Ck6IV}u ztmlfGl1dpl!1L&c+K#Zm8$FSTbq+Ql4% za`LU%bN2wM)Yd^BUMAp-YXm+|++BPTWymjn<-ngL@QwJj>^{!5+MK7|xGlJ3{pGqY z5meS+HjJa`(31_C3u>%e=1J2`<)6rF*faNg>UZpfOV4}fdesW~j*~9!Y3hAlf9_24 z-#Y^3To?2EOSg_3@i5w;^m&;0UNT}y2D`NQn5~VKoy5mhX);hZM%iQL`(udLud>>1 zz&*2}FCTQ#z9&}lihjQLhh-za{WskpZ|3{3i2t>_!F2=f89Ynb$MtvjN;B$l{VnYq z2s{yV;Hf67c`hZmFUnIuLqG3U&2Zji=6lRo|HG^A-!#^r4LR07`_*rMHrAg`9Q5|Q z<*8;YrX*io+sk*h@~3RQ*H^HAvp&g3_Bkn&d~|I;DVKaqN4x`}F9I|Xl>P|6tCr>gRb;CiL$=^w(*g8%h65MR_hL&kv{G+25PzNAyJadESr&exLW0UD4kk zsAu*gr=r5o^9Hs{Ao$B}J=gBP&JVNDz7gQ>Ic;s|)6Nh1enOrfrhs28kofSufIL53 z`Rjzq#`B(B@blcKNA7!%jpv6xbCiEg)`s8opxm_yj@1pE1d+*}+#&f$M;F+LX0w;{&xt-{z z-^`CX^#{J-W>xJcIM2I$<|_UDT6f4To zyifFQ@?Ym&%)cbopV8?0f1P(R|I)#q+UD@-|2pqt{^f%I&aCj(Pdo2o{;~f_&$>_?UNh!*dc#wzCH6iYq&7rl6n}25a?@C>F$lo8}B&x8A&MTKBww$ zL(ezZTylh{5cyQvX;SvC_+V}y@AIkCh-U(4oV?E5y+1bOvHtyYP2N2hIOEi@U9qHq zcGX5w-sgR#mvOqa$)nHG)XR&B`vYg3w*1ig{N;AXxsP!V0?vKT3mdv;qvf%z@FbR6iOnW@!4|6M-`yvOlg`)~omc{T*gfe+qEs+!>K&Woxx8K*tGbJ0Jt(B9eLzqKwY$J39TiVA-O z_?gE(i?X>39;TD2Hf`pRnC4m>|Wy* zX5d;q&wPGb-hVhOe5_uPR*$ov1w-Gr`v*7l?0io5MQ}UH+0QP2I(l~AOO^mpAh-iK z`&qderE8pOJFNrp4B+f%zf_t(^_53+sNX#Yc&XYQ-9=`_!fPFZN)Ee0dDCL}IY`l# zvmg8u@lMM3#QlJC+#mO^rT*P5limjIZUsI@3yNH}9Mi_W)%FjQza`GG$Tzk_lctvk zx?2TRxE=EBXFnw#3-++;urAMXXFKe=6Ulz4<*8Q)!lx-0Dc4s0)_P1P5Oc;tZZ z)ZWbDo~Tdsx%Ml|5*3#pW4mAW(p!bv^nT^#+OGn@zrIV&bZ@@`UinM(yY{OP@PD=a z(GNbBqWrG?DjEE>w{`oC=OL8R?@PM$E5W3{r7+(ip9d6ntO!&;FL_4Z`k-#2xq3@eI^Hy?A zZsd1;-$WAlfByd4$FBWb^t--qA|3pL4%`{g1_6cm*braEdzf# z`1#zf?@A>+T5`-g)G0!1I7}+^yN~b~hj3T00bZkBViLibI1PjlGJ+nhIUQ@0!;E z;2-8TbWHJ(LhO2fcFpS$@OPg+Z9@sfiBh89HLsJwzq0h#vr1aYsi^R~=5+@6x1AjP zcBz1({H}SO2mTpfG_scVE6VSh*M6&2e12Y8*~aIkDJAx}=Cuv{Wx8$s!$L+-8LwRP zS|Ay(vXQTL$a9QI!)NBX@XL6WiE{ZY{l#^@5$`nkTs|Gzw(s( zAkKXlpG&%U=0Tt7hbM1Q_7&{Y`1?=~N_9T9^J*9Uc@fQqXWj>VBO*K|ZlY+>fuPMM$l$pGNySd`PRa*bm3Gcw?w$-tSP|ITXMoV;3GoPO~4Os8Imcq_it z$GurUd3{Q$`pZ2D&pN+vbr$RA?{|>TTJF`t-^=(&$#LJ6F{osrbB_Sx7+1v(-Nq=z00sdaJ*{8T+9F_WgpvSUK)o%q| zx#*oZ9~XU3%i9p}KR;>g1FoNGfbjFV)NJH=GWpjnU+#KNFa49hN5%U@8Q>S4(y#bC zRJ>1g@b_AsjQ5Ew>kGI4;v=tQxZ!zRiAMl%w(rIh(QDidxQ+6NS9ZIyJ3WAF{&=~@ zE0+4MJeu)e_chqhlfhpy_{kstbzg(=$^ifAX_=Q?<0a!2PVvtsRuOSs>bc6W?a<$RtjFXq}KcQIbO#6JFB z7wtQd+3Hh;>bPeR^hSUVdCucyXG}Hy{wPlZz4BtmpLyR@^2T*sNCjVqzRfqfuJ5H? zUE?XXNV}%O&rHbkd60a3rv1V%?P}Se{8sV>^A7i8|7(Be`kb=Opikn)-z($u)OSPr zBuia#iQl}h{C}%YYbWT>09`y`-cCb1Ip>ey>dLR}BVWCJ`Q?+mPvpcS$|`)x#(Euk zU8<{pjb8G=-dmOP-29z8kA7v$G~6lgsI2%tSXd*c^Y6Duh(99F^%3W{5C8q%c&=gQ z?@>`_^$CAD<010NsY-7eXsHKPFB|;x%tATG?XtzHerue6_#V$Z@OdmZ&*D5G`uSc- z%SKgCNAvL{Z;baw`)!av_*K{zL;cR@j`<$Xo244A$^Sge0sqah(93h}PX?CUEtp)o zf4~{vmB04p&WfMofTSrMN`83F9ftqRz-fXbX(}waq&~vX`b3Vr|^;s{&kLPPB|~o-=*m|r_cZ#Kg>sIAi^kN=F^+Sw!1F*mb-q!oIP91H7K?VJeU?vE zJf4(T{&xw)f$D2jYu9OhkKV{{0YCFU1pL;2I>eMBBdEkH5B)e9e6=cU zdZJFVRC{Njoc@m7`_60Jhdpil$N~RW_m}QiTT^ILF9B}YESOW_620WdOQ@es|l4 z#=P*Is_LiyKd*%kHOl8g&S#6_Yc%v-=kGO0TwLuJyCp73kn@Ke&(VVLnRN)i#3cmf zO1|JdS^OOVzF*a|UVsPf7hbs}j{H4Q>U9|O$$PT+I|=&35Sk40;;W6rR=c6WB`^4% zEY_O`J=Tl6>blk|{=3#I_K5#kkn`PII4^?mnRW`l?mx=qv$QMEdAJ`qQ>?>SvsF-i z{wuN{a6mqI%9M4U=(mbn@w@H^GQhul-kiH$e&keCi$jt9KpyySd{%Y?&*Ld2{3#uf zM_7+%;675V&v!p^e~Nytcm1|0IU8u;RG(Wsk2mUfUGLk$|Jpa+b&F{SjmCKD>&B8w zFW38N;1`|JZm#=iDVMnO`8SU9SI(bW>uwcP;l61~FY{+b?q_{HtU9c zzwx#k$|Voke>qQazZ|}{#a!y9yx8yh{_&X9K1Gc6>JaAmc^~%0*uM;qNDt&-i?_R`$&2eL6(zOHomy z=_y#R=0kte3#UJvbf)!e;AX#_%0JdKp;nUqjtjx19)2H>l;f`R`+4Do>*M$HLZJ84 zO1;Y6ym;sq>q~a2@9~tXhXs>M`fVC;t{=946KniE9<%Fn@ZO1T`ZMU1&w_j&=-U-L z7ka-lUOsh_|9#rA*l_75*HHX3f`?=-V){;qlY-h%bVLND{H4R|u>feU{vH11>5P|o+U`H$RR*0{c-{aN7iyT5RUaUYu)ru?G*%kQRjFzU~P zoaJ-HcYRpP5bi_8z5w6>!0UV0`-kI^jEk<%joZLCecSktICe-Z>KeoA_F+T6?o38w3oV=0-A2mMj%=au%erHZfcjG=gnDSkep5jU7hFlj&`~!g} zf^Mufed5!e*Jk_pFM0ccn^i?bskkO_JAzkGZ)^2<14`BM2Uk=L+izPBQwzG@r!Uuz#{|Fc0pF<{l6%F*@p z@96xO9y~gyD>Ldzfu1kz!6$o989WH}IOikoV|GkC>3rXSf{Y~6l6jCm^KL3{L*_fPQtq2z}j zaE^n0x(xZ+c)!Dnc=5j0&PT~1Zo$fMkq@DKCsj|ExP!mB8*n>t=HL2RZrwb9YwhFZ z+MW*Z_xtTgk~yewdrEy))(5)tR;P!Can&49yKp}LdwTsoV?1at?V0n{H}4wl4cM>b ziBE_<(8g#l=QYOD2L9r=2aJ50y%ylHpq^1%obTHae;g=h{3Ex0_Zr7($se9okZNW6 z^%kfQO^}oKka#5|F2XW*6zAK`A+Ribx@CU zJmPyJmR;VspEijw`W9%K3&!*h1AeA+4T;l!Ix}`nQyjB?J91}6H;fsB*sRCMu#Ru#uONB zv^N=g|83MF#9#bFvC1w9jhzkvKc3i!77yqH};-XC7tFwc?6c(|cdBfk)nw8P+ zW3G_|5BR3A{}=r0xS8!DjrMfGqd)y9($lWP+BuP%slNKtbZ6g>*(R%-{z>Lx3*=%! zlR;}(U$uAzC_ad4`$2780Q&>cj;Y{J__R-JZ@;4a7VyV{W`lpoZ?_lvSc>x7p*I86 z=b-ZYvxmjJifMirFR>>Z{fYJjf`4JBE#->m8M)OtZ8G?+pb_Ao+0t`UiJYSRCKvt` z@Sh4z$|#vtl;4K&E)6sj{9P`V*i-ElGO*1 z^FO5G5(JuaaO^C11I~Fe1o)^6tsZ$8aK2ZR{ofR5YiI2LcE~wEUp-yq?&Mqx%8g+udyi@*&g@dhg3CH@yw=w2${iK6`cjCZl~BkmLHh@sxj$cvuVc zJAmha&K%pw-^Zw*@*S0(o(=yhZrsP3zE$OZpeLT>coj3s!#|D}qjJ8vY8)>@Ajkd3 zA1{_}&hr4tA1iP>=pP?N{8=3OW&P)a{LM%HI>1+Eg6G208Ol%oFZ{00WoLkY<@@Ug zmPsS0qQdX`{AwQfGivp1WpNbccYS`Ep+(%ffC-iGJ7TS8d?mcXwc|a&~em zD*Ud`uiC-C^SQOd%f}YwcYS^}4g4K0H!M{lq$t1Z^Q$@FAGZE#$%?k3{I1WhT8=1x zQ|eURSjk$LU)nPR>q{&6dd7^sTscVb37&^_c`WcPA+L|}HQ>o8XTH4n^#$)L20RTo z$Ca-SU0+`nxWvzOznBI7sO{?ySHp8yv|9LG_ZNBKAAIii>(%`W?=OVkb$#!5RK?@a z)%vY!_!i~o?;df#Xaj$@yxEIu`V{7ueH{0T9DBu9Ik&K5|7M3g`&b%28~OF~Pn3(i zhCO?qsjcrhCu{BFTp#%yQ+{=Q`IlE;n^#dk))zfouaNSdy>b2hG<`Pc8nJB7MI!y z?|;Qh*0)q-v?uU86|WODO(B(Y2W+Drt%>!E)El4G`c!E$>ajyl+ngDW{5MzW&&G;9 zj1Q?ZP6g{mnpG%Hnb23gU5g2A5%>L1jviI+jHJmhYA z?e1!F6v!omKMnM!wAPv4kdwG&qMYlnlRZ0Z@G;;#2h0Uuai7R*T*r#M&k5x}zwfcR za+NoV8|bC=aO%5xt}`Oz;wZe_%CT;w+|D%rVBOc-+@790oXU6)upQ3#Adx367+~FeM=l-NOJz>A}hvsM(kI+krCWq>O z+C1glPh~(p2eiz|$*sMT6(2+k?WauO%LnyXTQ0%dUX-8vDLeT5PpUYL>NC8!Pi#?s z?x(Ea4+ekWl}%lWg%suIev0-afj{Fn%lzWDqWs)XWuU#&!Qb-X;dUjgMftg(B7ZLU z%bw^lt7Je?e(tC2(C>Rn`8#oL%aW!13iC_5)I)G5FT9m!f<9>%u4jWFp9s1uePVEF z7d^ty^^8C2O$L9D(r31mu@tUX_^lYvxE{{{f4Hfp_Omq{ft7K>pO5*0`=31U-?@|j zb6IU%Hr62gso>{+#P0_chdIw5$SRjpls^Rgd`{Q~{++ik{#ITahh6piy4Yg}|1SqV z?o%P7D1R2_Z$AH#27b@Scb>1Pjk~V;?JoQ|;4kjgV0tA-QT_n%b6;#Zt^5tId-r7J zv}r_{2g;Y4)=3eZ|l#|lve)n{!AYDP1>d9&NJ`#MHW2PV$$Y8 z=epT?M(MlQbAG>O|7Q0UJsNI~KsoQD9eJ)+b>n@9B;Xtm>RfQtbqiG4EAreIP(FNC zi4jKmOc(h-{NGNXyo^V6#SrZp>Y4ky$rM1LwMJc)eHFc^YsBaIVj8y>tDdmjTZJ&UM(X zOBG(>`Jb#$a)5KamEG6JtXdU;CA3VzZ&pG@Ec|W?f}m7r>S4%cl0#i8NhkIwDDfG zrd|d-2RP4%zWx5g(cT8!bWZur`%8UC-E8S&!2KZa2fp7tH+3v-h>w->U6h^yy{A?$ zVZcLxbH6?%bW&zX1D=Zb+rjtCKi};u1zekNoaaBBFCF09e0X);(*7!sO}K>Lb-v61 z|L_&|_GNsF^1IHLdEl>kyh>e*Pm%f3%XPl=JFomc5kGTD+595ok(cXyX#@YK7gwDt zms^zIb-uKNKg2XTxO{d|e%JXj4g9$iCVf*Ovnapoe3=9O9>u3vE2bCacbzXSKPi8k zt?u|!rPQMQuJff8{1ao|nOHfcD8K7`84LbKgC0)sO)ARoI$t`#Z@N7>yGmkFe%JXj z3;gx3|GunhL{Wa%`OwFmke)nZzr)vZj z<#(Mglfhr9#_Xh;{zds+=gSQ6Tc=blUdy*Azw3ON2maKxwQsu4m-_R0m@kbzNzSMI z(2xCoR`KHblntMa{Bk}OfpY1(8urZRRpSf~#AxHKbDm9w{IczLd?wH7u$FpwHcrZV zBQZt@G3v>Kp3-N{%R|a-(2uobo$F^)ex!F$G!37J1gBi2PO21s-(M6T@B0Vh^MMWR zI?@&+e-`Qu9sp( zqBY|5s-jDOFTGJ@z z?@jC5dh2@+&2{I|pKQqUy=j%RR<52_V$xRP`M?>^T1)%4n{n{ikHFo1FR6Gip5L_Y zc%Ws^HEk##2%PcE?w%87ir%$`crbA0)7w|iT{^V3>OksG1m08%wCno2jutltZ+uh! zmUyNBcfe1+=kCbkO4>PM;Y;F`4u8@i_r=H8vJB5Xn?sr_e<*wBc;*yp5qY1>3gFI@7)bJpSunMU)7KP4fiO(&FSbLtlvH+n$2wz{YftM|Mqf; zd}IBo#5*cGcg$XR$yk3TaN1X^Vy!<7^?ODD&js!Ai|<_-XgI=7^?~&^L0r}1T5DY%|{-;)Y`~u|u*_qb7$>u#&*!R&gD)uCPxxgX3qZMi*5cxv zpZNQwRg<5u)%f6F-GDovcj5i5^$YCUeo9bX-ZL5c_};i*j=p!%!%v4rzd5<3vWNS? z=ZBPh%eW8Bf;{uM#pwk@jL&1{5l0>!+!$TxJ?c$9h|Cuq{~u-V9oSU${*R|=(uN(D1Z0F=0i`T0AR3lLX4wT4!ZgSVWtAOS zR%QT&GK8|rE{ISNB&a}T76dGUSOlRUqwFyK-RGXylb+m$_xJO=fAloxc|Fg0);agw zbMHOZxn)YPvqwhbk~JFoNu2tJJLH8@mAV5@^vZaYw1<D$M_f`nfi~4&X~iZ#i#7yUalCJ0RZ!+?R7lbP7}E;dBt)i+ax2 z!fkd}3YX}-zR&$({x6T8>utm>_;s1WetwRBafkf#LTxHp7oyBd`930-d_S?zkWqsL zN|odPPN5C*=0Dlotj}kC)qU|4Jq=FO^Y;jM9-4Ds$`d1B-}8Qkb3M-dAr8?3*%=T1 zB$U$^9Id5Su3zX-==y|a!j5$0cUXsvC(5i)J!rhk1mEkP4>sKp{5Sd(3)nZ`ihAx} z)n2Z5%FhSeKi@0}2c7bj$1f{zR^Se`8gbu* zJQH3P`ILctv;p^a@!o}UN%_e6mfT#lcm2YVhn#N|XZ92CJ87xer);o1NQV4wf1c?h z<$;m?!Sb&)Nh=`xBMW@&kI5yj+hu>Gfo}d+=vShAzlOp5;Q=lZxWrdqbq(eZ7jV(Q zU0c2MUT(=BZq##pLmgW`$OAh0pYNCO`6dzgt&e*~=e4uvMJdON&o^G+i)_5GJzrE# zymmaw0)Eun1*+zc$cfjUZ>+b3pU##3WM~0PPQ3Pf6Ak>y?~A-=HU(afQ$OYNjWYK5 z51NJG_2JTn`VTb_(6RP>(rjni+bL#?p~g2TlpMC^b8HX;))h``CLYH-CdzC^Y=Fn{)Okt zM7M&@<3&QB0t3R$!lGdI*nr|3bK=~aFJssfZ{Py5C$C>by-$|&a z-wN%u=jnERU9p6rL$Sv{KhFfexBlcCAKZI(5p;t&OZbELr-{B({7aQt@EapR=lSV3 zt46hE-Kak$6%hPf7Y#h*hp>F!hcD&nJ3A-LwDNVa!J}!vaOV=`n)68st3I3?Q%Z`L)*d2Lyjq+O^W|Evxx9Qo$szr`LE2ON;GcKDy?vCrztH0K zyTadm+^7lhQ6Bif$MfzwcN5k}p&VOJzAUqO-uMUfKk-L_&g(0M z-+1!hhF_o6V|oneyuLDQZL7JaxIY$vu8#x#_Jq!DsqWCm!#Bf1$5&$h1khQ(13R1E zFO5>yt^8Di#aF&&6D|tRBTKeDdb-pIPagaCn*0Rx!8x4skS(GQN z8<$F*dh|d^1;vBwy^xdi{%?EhUF?%Wbdtkk9+x~ub{yQ_{{a+Pj_INB!?g~d-|Tie zPSr=D8zNE9?QOg9!wPDH4u$T2uiE{w;P2f@cOWEE(8-UP&@UQtTqxW9-N?b~00RC0 z@?%YgQM=jpL*9#{e_7r!{;7ggz4HrwSnnxbqn8D!dN&qy(<4#7EckEp5Su^*(>nsV zTHT#7+V{bgHeTDmojv%8rNFqwL0;C7-StY0Eva@p(mSnGpx(_#Pv%DlRe$q!hZp=8 zR%Nx8*DJLC&H%2>((MiOuuoVi;^&tKf0XSyn$bJfVE!>l~g} z#HV~ZFT_FI>bipedjmY)BtVWkcZVIkej(6^8|W!0pOq-(e=n2T%S1h|16b-e{MCT# z3`O_Xjt?U=;{*5q2%oU8^PUGkIr9FYo;JzuXwwDwE#Wc!(y?N9Bs;?n=L zA97kW+sw;l)TDY){I%^8f#RPEKJyEW{rJs#5MGTx>ghMx!`Hox!vgJPKkK$` zni$N_{&pefi(*?swe6ChbF{0pM}Ce3UmQyILlS<=ejq=4QBV3Rn^p-JzGpL+h(R`iMpERtyE5{Hp_<&r>%1F41_Yf#;ai z79Hf@%z{E5>+JxZ=t|vd=S{Kw1`8R&*h;Fk# z^pDPDw-59btQS9f`l1Kxr26H*K)c6QpZ78Qg~k!B-BG~rFEsBQ$4F=^<_TK6g`Ubj zX3!%B{P8G>uEbNHDE%h?<5eEO)y z`j-SEKk0NMj?Pk8*iWDB{$URbAU{|^=l&Vitb9tgpOk)FC@`Kj;340C9XfR8D)qkg zi=l%n{8qKezvcT= zdK>6$-&S|#p>dPkam?=ko$XtF@b89i#jhX5bT_w;>)7NuXE#^}R=5hfJ`r@b?{>G| z9hR-ErSAPr`M}q6Tymf5(|>qhl0krf{f4PX}KVaB(_sg)oWk>mk}_`K2~4*ec79)5w34|9MeaehladC^HXqn$OP- zDE9fkr^d=+{}Azq2V4J%dj2gFx@qx~98QR$Fk>ip8x+PrL_cXk7 zvtV&C0~ZBcV_kZYU~$PpJYs-5*x*u`T!;(B*^6QE7*nYxi;JnB9 zB;ad)FyJ`P2^dfFOYM1@Xf(fc@c9+|{5=GdN!ZQtBRtJ7t*96L+4F0Dj+5V`dVVoI zpLU+B&aXA|1&1V$=GTb^5qBPUI6ghkTlxl@Uvs<3kh37Fkbga&bfiO_Uu)W>da~aG zzI2q_t|`}R>_@%e4-I!?T;lmJ&nGL*-Ru7zEn(>(`!h6pI3#&=-Q&UUNPS@ba~xPd zAyNFL>z-suj?zE<&oAy z*@Ks^EW-0r|8+?mu1{uVRh+N4ipFRhOF{d5-C}X=Z^-9QrGJDcu>L6d`N^dvn-%Br z4yr485E>o_9LLdz-_g@*n~XX8Uw91TaorS=NBHa8LtlTu_YYY<#XYicU_4`hCk)w> zIY`i1&)*Mi{E%Z#bk`8jalJC~)pB|NdxNb;p#1dipUuy1UwJ#}?rPqgtQ8pSytc0}Y8{)|CMbh@5%Nxuot`)+frwa*`Dzt=@_=sAEy$YDM%b;%+R zyc#<3@uBEpOb^gQ$qzg~#p@MwyJV!XOf|mwg*_a9+lYSk<^E^~o#XpY_W=vJKPvo& z)JUNhKPOnS%hyxn_3(I>kN&iCNskrsbDK#_M;;FT?%#oWT+x$$sZ7WDzN+b)v!S3< z|K|6ioWNzGtW~nnz+lf|^1dkS4^shQ|H;vM&_cjzCH~-_TzU?%KGwiD(p{7L1BOX%`KV) z(>ERRqJT?pw|9`FuhEHm_J7pQ`AfoJkCIETUDp}bcVOS%!~6QbDUW#juji8>x7{DJ z%1;U(-iz}gYJu<%x7X@S$+-dZUyVL(NB8)E$9vMJFbPr)E(?jDI#+D}A+i03k8anu z=ddAzhw)a2Dpkodzg|&=gukr4?>Nur%2%2IYCpv|!|Sj$I>pYA&qE&YvEIgot&Xu? z#GkC8_b)lI2A^k0@BGk{OWrT0=dfXYhYcIlcd&nVMpYlbzFClK@+LIy?Az3g^^M*U z=*I)w^H!DpXe*3kVo#OK;1jbN@9L5q90(n6^JuqVs-i z96#rj@w?^tMT3vyXPQ}e8T*6Uj|AO?^4%)?el-M<&)*kV`f`g;iK}|3@n`uM=T99B zzaXE7JfNqc?E7PZ)<(!z{Of<7G6R0f0&ZBda>c?m{vy09NyMM^F&7nnsn+`N8Iwck z#eWGO2|WA92K=V4N4}dYnvtR;ycu|Yp2`J$?vziO=e7mn$^Ll6I}y0GkG37llRYjP zQ!oytfgbu!>4N;6DDh{Zp3md;P7dysPvSSfA?)KkXjXk;B=Ci9{IRq^ zko%e1aX%XPgxdRanatJ=o%i=dj+zzplbm3oKuT28~^xfm^ zdaFuS{m=ZIw~M9}uNPv@rl*206J_P^KdTxl@yDayR9yHWsa)d~ypBWq^Lj3~f3rvT zeRBJD@Ui?aQx?A=%Z~uviSn$Y>DPSSLhvz z5PsqKgjAT3CXeg9&T0p)?af(p`Mj*?Z?M!7_HmymQsm%bYMT!7Z#>IK|EaL+%shEL zFNx_G_ZO}B=9sKsD(D=4=hu#abyg?nnJj0A?q|OKq;bTAdK3I)dQ;f@=YS!}oCiW% z=nGr~aBq#-`zY8tE6c0v?Dm`7AL6iXXh*xXnjZ=9SE6S9)7Yrq$8!5AXqV&Ff5fG3 zvcJ-q4u4tZ45%gh%Lh99Yy6G6E9H15fNm)%{7`7xxw*mo6$e}ta8+v7KOf9rF~G$D z=bmR?kjpA8BLCab{}K`Zc;JSW*)lfR`e!P}GsY(YU$$ulU9j~}?f6SA)B0aLG(1dXCe2oqnhRbj5GsQRuh44(tVf-&?QLUb?q z`8zR{rmyWT&qotM&p`RiZg`*9f5=|#b0{CDA3MS>ljU2>2s@@eoHap~uS2~J<%V%H z{^9R~mH_nrtUk2@aET@hw-w{kdt5w)vKkU{yS-uYSHk8FI6O;M7r_`^t`QiXBdf3h! z-#exGnKnO37s^{R;^zi`GD@P;x>~CAoB9P`zw`LO^TPuVwin@b5#ptT{K)yo&n?gB z^~(`y{@}k()ZsbecWPA0Xi=+ESLWyQB0oP|^sb>uh?S_Sd_R9;DG{f&Su=Zf+|Y6e z=>F%X`8nR3RaW`eMBmTY^_dBYme2j-aNhtaJ**oM(c|Jc9mJY((fpelXmlt+# zSv;y(s8xme{}5hlw+;BH^ZCZ|xXlcN*V^p@zF_Lc1fycNe5m~(H1K?r2t46}+K2Oh zzA^dz=YN(N%)Tth%l~E4_Wz50)(XNO|AbGu{C}}88u%xL$DaviU!>+aeK+v0vyc13 zu-sox{=dX84f2jWEw%ptVxO*}uy11J3t#AR!p=np=WERRdR4hTmwWJvs|qH#6cC)KOx8{`wer@iM{o?9VS z!J*Lo!%I^wYYoAS}}eULQJ zxnIQm68SIR2OKTl!t?mZ{`UYs;a;B3CXN58pP1o)IW9EMcd^~z=lsvY zZy8VXeA8RPZqi52>!gw*e*fqjl{xn?gP&*f=e-m6_cNNUj(fFmlmC7@%lG2>hOIl! zH|R09#(1s#C|oDEEL!hw(chD@P1r859a;2M(=phgk`hul;5v^j%ToI#PDI2 zRj6#25BBD--K}DcgO4)^KyvtbKQ8%RXx})OdS60FQpM?HdA2ITfA`yL?$u*ag%&JN z37L9u$>UG25z1~6*jZkd#cuUb=!Qs5KHZ(YVh+eEzpbjUllQm0vGBd-A#Ojv(E&Q|Bhq5= z{408i?gpLT2Rd44wdLO(0RP+Qh(z`c|AV^?K^-QH00`@Ft<)U z6hFT8nwFJ(0StD7W$hUZ;`<3stbQyf7R_!m^UZh0em9! z0Y9qe?6VLm9c!1-5d{=mK?aLJe&-Z8CXvYh_gL(Hw z@^^)}6|z@{{>lE&0={{fc3bnf1Lrq{Pr*3K`!-l3g@5Y&)w4%lS5CYOcz!N08u-OW zX1>bj$ceWC&-<&pfgd&L%5V9jbK;YbH>`g$@UJ?qd{)4g6CV#e>z@Jq{bgBI&5=3r zPT*O8a}8l{j|C0G3tDsH?W|9<7=LWQ`!1(_S;(9duibyt1$^<-O_B<0<~KCIjMmIA z6M@$$2lWU4KH4Wl`-S&7>W8EdRizseF~8vX=ie)%_R8~5b4~Pr@Gq^Dcd5j0QC(idWl@20!=Lk&~|8&`Wd|=zP9BmizM6P>JpVozIv0u%{-2M2`eL8Rfrk zC+m#a_WAYW^XbByH&a3!I`vS;fAI16R^#!)rh18Pt|jc}`S;zqk6VOF^hl;-{=B4C zQU5+)BtH%Eqk$`WIrrc&Nk13!<9u4Ad&wc;65RtjpHJVi4}RYy(X$ZmWZ+&d|7$@m z(3Sq_zrW4nMH;s^C1z~yB-IW6KZMtg7g@j`S(3gZPl6w+{zG`}cwwzA{FT34){DIH zIr2M9J6=Qsf2W>tNxrz8cd6Wizz8=!OE9{f;bUkE2J-J`WbEQiQ9PbY@ zx<=FM&MOw)KQ$xjA<|BW&K*7d8y;17ud-Tz+Itt*iWQbV4z`~=YNVt<3={M5E% z%XXmumAneKyeI7A>#fKKLQe9S2XAQCj|s2cXTh>d;FnEYa9D38so4jO6Fk0Hu`WM( zLbVzpHh~EyF9G`eRJ4%)z9&m0c|4xEA+L5R@1G&c`I3%c@-iVWeqirSdK;m#4<+`m zeGk*wLwyBE1uO0P=bKSc!e8rl6^Q(L+3gepkX}3v^Zkjll{=N;@i>@XZpis!>9|vR z=+Bz{Z@ua;jN0|#9<}cPJ`rU+@I6X=oN3Vbh48#DfeH8& z;I9=2n#%GuL{u^_Vd|u~?g8Vq(bJva?noAkiPk-2tETb-SWZj{8=Y`oiAUXA>IekteJZ#oveaqkuaT<;@=&ClEw; zqMq}^R=(F`gGA^4%llGvGEHg3{g?RT!JmY(p0m^EMv0%t6Xt(jtAvHe6XH(=Una_; zSv{tON&Kewg?%3Ee_?ofbAPx*j{rRl^me&^m~E2icF=j>4D*f74Re7`{>+j8!0XpG z?3CNdo)jhFbL2npwFjhj;{6esi|{$}ANbM}Pu$|?-()=R%i+&|;3xdksZX$d5_w+^ zfBrWR{+hMB(Xe3qB<9F};2V{XUHHHDN%ZGG@HO9SR+aWiln*+ubN(x1qW_?E&UEBq z68QPNo{rx#p3du8s3##xo*1HvihjYkK{eY|ie;OljT=PAzz zxU_(|{fOSZl?QN##9I3gat-WD58|pH`)1ixl0GiTrQgbaT)C3*dqr%Qr&LD=>ET-< z^zefIaNQa4QYq-^sE>0AT+-E#HnW~8zlMIbzGE=^is;cD1RswN&$+qNwyx$Pzqs0S1*+m%x{MNPaejct`k^P6{Sy&#*E>|ag%wbpjqP!WFeUM*L zfjg9NK8z_O$K71Cmk#>fL6)ns-BB$9>0KR9?r^M$KMQ3{Nj8t8m|@0=p+9q3Fqu$_dZgY1n4J`3gE zWn0GcS{u==4H0M9eeY9m30@N#kkf1g>rR!Z$fqhCdX{!ZbH6Zs&3&f9Ly_~HVNAjHql`|$oe^{eZL z%l0M%&*RVM)joK@`Ay@ZR=$uMs`G#^4P}e_rIU% z!+nQ>?P5L%wGvfakGSUx|ML6aJpYL<*>Q!zro#MxlsxtCyPtse7(cvM+x5Zbx4f_mSg)C#O(;_}BTC3P0X`Bf6pVzLvrMo~Y+_zVhoHy(`aueUQg~ z%$J_~Gl}1rj=1r>a_3QdBY8e)`AFCsg>q87@0>nHgpBlyVLIL?ZB*s2QT%?Dn%|)F zb5nEvYrdBEqa%6(=sa$|J18@dtQMKMy8gxBUvL^I)!dY@kWDpy2cJPEJOml)uqzsXxCw=zkRE_*({IRt};&P|x$EBDdPjuutYM<=V(uLemT_SLf zmV)0a@zHpmF8x;YFlfJb620if3{^?!Y5G{$?VBp(9qzLIKI=qwM1b!7LePKOk{Ze5 zG10ld@On=FKR=0<`R(9$qHI}x?H$>V{QaDG(Ce)k`=;zime1=u4^~W@8%%yG_z%w6 z&?cDtOwgA#9{ezvd|s!i{oS13g2|6)F8nmM?Z5tg`pACP-wt})NgpZS5f?{*f2@MP z^QU_Pp5wJcuXyms7wfV)nEpwi|JNqhT1mdaTqQ7%j$ZrSBgZ!a@-xA|aL=O#a{Np! zgkBM#uUs^)SFrXYfZM-h%Y3PQqh*?CpXDE_*3c-+Pue8tEI+09tXDEU9&$~a1@3*< z-{s`?ouDV79FkenA-B)_x}<`hyV&lF+5Jp!w4*)~rLNVbc6{ML@kxck?1Lqw>jGmE{O<()*L&SB@cfd-ff&s=5Dy$R zpvVugekc55>m$l~?>tN^)U4G?&<&};bIz7I^OgE+E$GHf(Bq*;qrJH{$^J975_YqG zmyiAUBwIhlzQ0AgJU$dE5V?rkBKz&&=l*{^A^M;kUvA$C+@Ud>m&);t*U0bu;grI% z{3P)4_;de@{TF2Ushaki<-Hzo-4+jeCd#`*KKY96SK4{)^FqU8`;YA3b0E1AlM- z-~Y|+Co^AH5s!{XYU_#(+~R)^Dh+hLe*DJs^z3&Z=TaAk75(*Dpf4eT%CW+i_U~`6 zmMxl1R`!C?kPe{oCZ#L7txsGcykJglORBRq8l{<1Xv( zL44f6t#1=jRvxD!kiW^G@9Eh4TlspN`&lOX`L(;JT5_JN_Jhxk@t|@-uKMygWrut| z&zAaYMH{)FvHZxk!atW{?-Y~!ajJ%Y-~JifWO_9CTqtLbtr>8h_b?rPSeP&3KlYQN zzdwJ~joK8)8BZ3=D!0_a&k_3R>Zbn+J!Z+8j#Yd`tC5c>ep!&u@pGXaU$^_=p;&hy zEFFYT1D^BI+)miNsf+C%`&FRT{$orA-Ui&Hy?MWo<7a03K%cY!O`SZ>vVZM3pX8c$ zDHpdx@k<6@1mbt;Ww{RWd5Gi3^O)^7Z4-mVFAH+I4#?$|204p!{7o**CiIg!T=R=#9CxB8Y3Q!)@9vWF z$`}FpslZiR`et`dEJdf+uIngC(~@1Uv=d^+IBn`A?7Z~-nv*k2l(|8+D0D+4>e(vL@6VrK@%22pzp(ri$hk7=h>6E0 z;^%Rk`JejY-jwO-;PatO&a<+rte>Teu$#y6_ATE0LCRDAd6tvEjAi-CH%h(Yd9a^; z0XDU7J8IYI#3~2q=l{y%Hm>3QhYa@n!9SiRK%X8rx9tu6yW0ywD0UjWsONET;r2@> z1-D8!W`NG)V3qs*a&gX+pLo8h>niLmGx)t7>}S%GbCOHWVdY`{mOY0J|B%~)J|T{_ zA|Gv#H|B=fTX)5$y#J5Eg?iR^cBgkat;rsv2XxkV*Y`CaO8OeK`|*GI;hnv#1M#PU zpXa~&od-ur{KhP%WBz+Gvda&8tB^qa$)KCN34h$`p6Lsf=vLMb^sg2)KW6})=1Xz# zH_xx4feSfWuQA_06s?K*Rg5M+F5r8XedzxV8RJR6DBu%;dvt$BIl12?AfMAff4BCT zDI7C}-(ac}c>U11(&%}z{4DU9KN0pD&)&Ylv8VQ9AU_iH3ll!M!P7>fdoV6UgTAum zm}5LgA$l6--!9M(Z|pdd=Q6b3r(Fji-DrIv3FCwZe90(@PV0TC(r>a;S1!;_eeaf& z2ulaaOVO-1_#}QMUtaqjK+o9W{d`F#G@7G?uoVzN~=pg^P(f{~+5_vX^ysNaY z9;*MrpM~=Iy^7CR7t)hs%_Zkf?;(SG_jL_d=W!56?S*8G6@HHFF6`{d;tLd%Y0~5ngEg|1`BFr5(Q?-H@{@yw19vci)*q0EKQyLOuKDME=Y3p(fFdsi3nTXKa4tWGvA$ zL1#bS`E+|7*$xNjCWr7t__I&Gk^K~bdiP}Ehv{kEzn1-E1-~7*rn`q+;`x%I$5Wo0 zaLI$da@~^Sf`$CSy2nG_j`SaE*C>5*JNqLA^^7~V@8Z?~e_)?E&hy116{!G_KYZX% zKwccO7q_#%M7Q)5e&D=${_)US@;J-utx>=&+8F*h_Z8w#hx{1O7uTxm<32_H;I_DA zUk;D$IhZ?{A}1scb|gT~w-JYKnv>c*U_W?K&*MRz*meQqc?Q#?McfK(zO;{hMtbUc z2|HQOgS9_7&UzA^?c{xFCr?{*UFNrf--fc{s*9aDw#4s1JwJyrZQkjMoCD+sZi`Fy zp)%fl7TYlPGma_j_2)$*?Huj~)-8Pb5yLb>gy3O1tAL3)~c z3qSCCl~*>0yJR~fH1zeu&IYUt*+J)gFm5<8pKT%ePSDwpEmGp1vCTw}2c7*r#yxWe z`;q*_|8vQ_O6TcE8?#pyrm#JJKczzMS<9a3)pOna1NItxsAn60**d-(iy(b0eUSgi zpS<@ww36-N{fN1L6(bG}S{kwkb;&R;Ai0%WO`}bn2*(djJOJ89>-+!*$ zuXcXu{NXtkmpmsMJY={?pq#_7PHETgb5lRzkEOTvd|v73 z{PP?~8|pcaUS@RqShgz@`Z$0)xv^`6d>t8w{BnbS`CLp1`8v{xaWoP1xo7u}mFJuM z{ve-!-?B#jEayQ6_`Eo86>eGc8##}4p9#D8y!Osdr5AJGBENHgv;wzhP<$zlAJKW7 zw}D=(=Ejb4+;oTw(`!2>9F*y9@Y#T~KCIDJj%y<5JboTty~)6FrS|Q}3oCFZQifHR z^~*p#k2@9W_05#q*Exm#Z0CWa({IY{TacG5f8oP?`(^n&4zT~XY#x4F_J0ESdHz(_ zQzu}5CI{Mgqdc?X_mlFxBN6o+ze#tOo|EI}Wq!o>!HZ*7IerpAYnY`+z_-_zIY*iUl4+t8j3xI3HY?Uv(Z1>FVum{NN`ko$ud z@$!Ja+tT}m+#ixr&;4mo$phu({@?(A8gQ=v1~%fpPWj?Rf5-y;{i?5wJSHe~LwW@< zUUPqb7+Y@#EzYF!rD0}_ZNx7O62hn*xp9XrPTqhIdd~)p&?MH(CUX$Pck>&G#zvcnL zzCZT-Syj^C$owAgAK5cEzsw&AzG#%O=db-I>&MSYxIq7S+LLm!emtHfuMm1#YUx|c z?R)!)de*PWCmjNwV@QVFG?d2o2N#yx&q94V=DmHs_4>clM*d^{%man}ch|-y@Z6N> ztRMI1_AOopJXdY~EKtA1_N_mb^^b;J7s}JI*K*7Hc~I|ME96|e(4?L0AJ#7!xNn|} zyAq%u)?L{@weroh%kA^JY!>*l2DMuvw{IRK?B?gjUmUv=aQ}(hj|A@E8yo!JlUMTK zwd>QZhV5EFaFk0Cy+`???}Gb*cM<#n@GQYI^OLjvkKw<_&PU5GR%x-kWGzTRtG zXj&=85wg|#pPjxNAdkzW!wwb?n`VLEd0_et@LU3x2zBQB?`D- zLh@IX=UaT8%=;pnZJ*_l-Jme;!+?D?G1lb9G;Nx+n`_A+X#uAqv&{NL@}m|x;IxWfbW(~p_*sT`k7jee^q4eBY&=kveGCG1}l z-KDZ5->-iJ=uvSMBV_-xeAa(k^8@j+d^`A@C}&Q*TVM8nD)fs7J>fyZP09bpc+itT zfAYy2yX5?e06i7-LCfk+k>~SHjz8#=mPBun=MmB952m5Q{-;$tmX+rbX&5geK(ExP z`TO!bC=zr#=$-C2e<;thJQ#PKpx5@DT*UJS%8x9ZPvSveacII1^1Ol9>AAn3u3K`P z?B7)IMMF;L_`Ln(_$7g!iL&2`e(CbOgU_2T=vnaZ(>vt&M8pceIKh9b+PQdHf7Xxp zN#9b+_kpaR6Z||be;?lI9a%p+=W;bOxVZcWutQyD+c5@Ju*(--pi!uQ{qf8g(>J2AiFr>8sz=aT2_^t^%p8=9?$$d4W9l(_k?zvI#V z*=lJwevf}!HC>?_yr}0`g#K0T2ia~cC%Y0*&+9|2dXz2! z(L^_R+k97=5Vc=MOeH){T+-13!OYi4%IP&sbhj?ypg(=jRXR8K%~h$J+$R zj{)x9Pp$Il1- z<3OJn(fqcoe*)@xetu~D?p5-8foz`zxYCcuEtd65M|}*+P7l&g1hkKOKHsjGGwg4v zeS_T?*nfWdB#-*c0s5!WGDi3%3Z=1siBod^rEvS87Y#SqE_~LOsh-^}Rnrt6m$44X1b6b7)M2?RS{2c#Ld(Q;DPPdE|b~dU% z%_;krBF9Btx%N6U%{!f7X6wt?(`?QR_u9*P;ri1?R_aip(x+e9n1oS^2=*yNJ zJd_`k5~7>A=T&-mn!_ z+Txf~yLA6h`&fUc7BEGwE2?~*uEj9Vxau$DOFnw=|a8_c+UR{x39R_7png5 z!2ECZ>YA*-e|(MtF6@`D3$T8QoY$^{HH}kdg3>w|w;2aH4NFCSc{ur-kKhMGBI@~m z?zVZu0_^aD&hxSi_c>Y3oM6uUD&(?h*>@IftcK2@k|EfU`MFUL2=ei687@C+@b4B{qtbblkYun z$!i8Qzt`GMcKe_IgIwdR-m7n3nmU&nROkj5>Umy2rCo*ELK~HC^nlL#p0ZajE$eFq zJsIVd4Ml%o-;q6OsONt3+gry2-t)==ozJTqW-W=}=kkc3=Y8hM!Y@Y$em53m;`&?n0SdM}iN7&~X zXs6umm6y-=I{pjC(KJoi$+-Ma-~E*(kR6t}VtipcLJqeKc)!&Sex?`9_#;#9ml2>l zQC2FvV~Xr2_9MUl+WWw`&t!U%M*f>++lR<;j%PZ`cRP2@P5 zz7+QJefA#5O!3?w$w_bb}Z5Jf7;V&v}<)9^PqyTl~NEduR3fO~TMbaD2f+I}z5 zKF8%~huJpv1<@lAFOJLlUH=8VPw9nRe!gMIsuL@vd6qE|^bC~$+!))DeXh3uRbbo? zB{rGN`YC>T?Q?qS^J&?B^v@q`kQdeN)WoZgyR9UM(vHE2dVc~`8 zwsLUqfbVZ7Y3OIl_llM6Oa-0$!LPaPE9Cx>2|D|0=l8eI$o<1K9eDtM59x8KKtLQo zXFs3+V8<`)N4j4aKTC`ctUs5-1|K@j`6k;N(Hnk;+{Mkic9QK$K)nj}-MM62mFMY{PcHXURaN5VkE>;d&^P1jUg@vy z=37qyimMIveEyq%X~##hoet2s|MhBHE#NxS4LbL~X`hwLC;Pz%I}(9w(K+)3>q_}+ z2i*($%oW#f%lXS|Zd~%You2!mv1@Sufvhgs;~%$lGljhyj@OBOF)!{W>GabKZx!Do&E7wY@TVdKQdrvGH~bC zUyG9FJ4P$=JPq_WMkK9en8!kEiLt@2aaDHbf|BydeH}fpvk45RfJeuGb`V-r0 zLp|emZvT2G%OHCkp!4{3;FF>a8B6pm=;;RT+>_S#I95b=W86vv{hsOK-|{+XBF<}G z&=(E(ry+KZjH(j4Q zH0vpRA5F;1elCgU?MeUqo=1M~-ZV$p$=@|PR_>oUY$(m!wa-ID0AK8vJf(PCqPFND zyR`aHJ?+Pn3BB#$&srq>ABW!@2f{0MhImjf__M$B#@|QI!gq##czEEFc3)zOuTL}o zKX)WXeOH|1QG9eBVK;yOBmaP5i$fxbD(F_G<9(^4`qgXo65R$m`*mf#p9h3WblzXe z0o>DbP3^pYEuA-9Ny2`L} z4&d9L(EpQL8I0ukQ(n7~*Srsy2Y8Z6@lCY|{dk|R>YGj($?0WU+?YC zWyy)x`pX0SpxfuVX#GX~j{PP3k@}sN{Q!QR!)D>PjHiBQnlJo98d2P$dI>*soH<`h zXKwR9|Hs->+|o4TkzJA(p$pC94ioZt&cgoxK0M!!5VMd({?fLa06EuEiHg=}ypjUzWk|*ZlU?^U@DN*T;j-=jv)phi_jw>q<+alU+%m%X%vNpc=UT zT-WPP_J>j*ngRTsvQf>rKTsUqn(yWMfO}cG)e7zSsm5J{H-97i64LHbA3aYVNJ-@& zJn!?za&5rp&)8EdRD-8Hv7-N`LJt@4Bu}yRX%YHIIk@Ee>w||h9x}M!h+)dh!W~At z`ZgUrB5>W1{p5wbo@-82bIk8Kf@G0D**}cqdVYV#vLHMDgy;H5sh-9kALQFnUr0Z@ zCi|Pl7YFKjpTu2J_H*oKqPs!o_kE9)>vE9&O7uj~`TOfNx6iu5ek8gVbnh_HpN>9T zH^=}#6Fr0J*l%ZD!IO1N2vChfCw1HlJ+3XKsyX z6Kwp;@jYDNYt*pZ2{!&|^T`AJuw3V+(D)}G6erFnIj+?I6A>pb`2GDKzh%5S{v~9` zpYoc=Z65bHUT4#YpC|rr?J4)O zAU_4=%F9>Q@OVIZkl9h>2gh;6g=&v@en)gy2SGP25_W&98_<&1eMz4z%nSJWrwHKM zU9Z!VugBPa!lwbx^H4kRVWsme*Mv>AHv)KmJ}nOTAEwM)&etj|U$qBzCIQ!|QuB`T zbx=C$+1>&npM1&p|AP6~2mHTFN-pQ?4{ne0N*hn2spl2wVOcEv#(8DOZ;n6VDX$!; z7yQ|I#oyoK`Rw)ok_PcOL0CG-Zr(qizb9vHTi#@JsAP5g)qdY44ecf6Yv~S)7C8Q^ z_#s^TeU~iYe_r&t*B_2YQ- zW1fGSmu8O(N<0jaRYkwy`Ddi9ckh7lA9$XBy1rbjljon2j|D%|zh7Umiym>JcqcMH zu0LvD+SoZ%qI*H-Jpc9C>IKsEMVK}pGJvl+c*c+**B4>he9(O>?ER|y<<>#2FT%9> z5DEO1H770wxxNU~=7R(HEnlq5%g;w}ywrS$z8>Iy+`OtuF6sQ_MLnOtmedb%<(AG* z+I-3Ye(?5|r}IQ`OQKZr!$0nFKIxVT`%Sec`SMzF;mWZQ0(AbKks;*GCPjZN(v0bL(D{2t$;Xd< z+IMoxiJ^zg$HET9Yk?kON)-09ebKis&MDCTHt(Al z5&=5fH~fot_xzPMS?!4=-wrz4=gS(FGQUg&(?gt~vwi;+TeGWG_trpQv(yheddkcP~|7l!H1w94V%kY0o2s&xF4ip9%hV zH27j*ykm+X0kA9otRdqW<_oGV1Vxv`M*;g#_R zcpM{r?4T!No*Iwe^Sa!7$6%vYvJb-RUI{sjPXgZYJnkD~WHy%mBmJXti}uwU@k-sC zna2)nS#x%=mOh6nlw*41x-)7|*fEd(SNQ$sUA8a1-R!%12T=vxzEa5N{oYeXuIUr% zAgYK@1n7Jn;KXm6XGvWiuLWA*O^j!M;P(8-^1@DKabvJR^X=ICbtzqnh>EJk&ma?~wIN zt-Su8-Yqahj|V^d&pE~Ub|~o7o)h`U{!0SB#`b;E;cvOu3G;LCon%|i1k`Jj1K66RI>{VFH$gj3>Sh{n8%zhCv)2Sc~W^D6!x z70-vKersII`K0*A|NSZ+-_jxf@WcDDocF8~#XkjfAIhIbk6t8ypDJRlu%Fw@Kcm)T z>HAau@r6H5GPd!Eu;m%wRE0f8{vIfg9|xOn*`)Uf4b=RHe4fWu=rXu!DCoiLNdkUt ztMBg{+(HijmF-Doxql7qYK#{MqWd)VT>P+j`><@f-<~%^1W$!Oy|Z^&{(DBhh@bty z^Da~S1ye#C0!#Fmb;4h4&+(5wOyluVwFh(_Z{qN~)(;=O$>#+jO|)kLJptu~%pKw3 zLGBIe+^}V*Q=b8}oL!z6K0`;9dXh$hNf04eKtS^suz!^jH5DbvO9kEzTtbV)?k4C<@|^I$-+tg;-fO##zZ=Fej~H`|3?=oVxe4%70Ld7d-y@5;l#L^Ut(C(Ed;DzaINv`4<6v)clj(3~tdT z|E2c0KiPqs`R%yla{k4kp7Y3O==yE2{3`={YHY1H@bA6mjnoFo_aY7)&jB~q#)jC0 z21HNS*z?npdUf=mlmAmdXaD=~`%mNb{e1sMNE7WPfNt3!{4_sn!_;8;R~Gs<*w^L@ z)0hta{=(O>+#lBFTeOYuBdPfSxqQBg$M1r5&&GyYSrbvJ@dP~yWw*scK9}<=6M4e& z(t-PP=ZMn5@+%d1A8^mw$IQrs{388woc}foKlB~e_`AH$K>Y}x7oMYIxqp}A1C0yUE zgq!_P^&i6X`VHS#@_sGGDa-R;D(bB{@q9h+g4{%u&L6wvSU({792dUdmJjnUq5g~Tv$%O`tM7!pHhMEIPt0kQ9Yl2_hI9$Ojy;XMWitZOL5MH5&L<7(32u%)cYp}eR@iEg~ zpz}I{>-x;~Yld8Y8+5$~^auFv^St--=J~l^k88}I3_7nP{8=t->5;)3)C{Bc)3|-C zBkcR@jPsX@+to)>NdGL*`5BdY%V!Px;o8%8NIvx!^EP2Gzh}?u2zw(d>w~T%;5sDw zq3}y|CBYxR>CILAdgXC+!6YT;1N#TsV+WxNSYvBF=_&Q+Ds<2Px>i{qG&5RfA z-wUh1TDpI4FjW)v%zxk0J-5uS+b;C=;ySzQ)LVPy^;s+E{9H^}?r~it`9>S_V|}*# zfYFEe`2aJ_C5qyO&>>a-P@x<7XuB=I?~Rj_u$7ez0*Ns)X=2U)R}y zr}!)OhVVFJLw+9X7&i0mw>~?@bPw=+pFFNe)7vF}y`$dTRrvMEp!2x1?@}dm(L#mQ zWhs)+_ObkNho1e_pjaLC))3LNH1h4IXDm$~*WnGcuQ%@y_VGQZk}0*4yFS}jm-XX$ z3d?`=Xx`>2wJ-KydNlZ1|L;Ga-h2M0vh=DI*{^qjt}fClb+taa>d5(=*bM*8e^XVM-*Sx@YSkdV>P4`phvs(LvUCR9^ z@MWQ7-&=PFk9!pAiC-D#jLFMIKJ)hn{)kSvn)qwRto2R_Hulz{KaC7_!Up#7EfsYW8zcCqf_E+1th^pZ=M`m4zfLIXeXL+ zgMQpA#l!!-YhI^!8cO$)?M(z9_pd*#zGb;&`VZ_eQ#8_TV_pcp@&#QvdiO54APM&p|edE^3r zB1)pG^B?IqjRSFeL|*ZC!?SQ7cut*)3Bj)0c-@8ZnUGg@*@`vnea=O9uV; zzGd(6yqMyowTJZ#WPG~-`Q@ppLheufun~;hJY;OLFYaeXnkfUI2PX9OUzL{AV2>blAUb+;gTUfX>$uTW>wPc+}oc z-6KP3U!MZHdV`6We&5n>@3>9xgWu@dFZ|^=F3Mf4ig@%o;Z@S#2Y$XUTlVkzFG3|c z@1Ml{8;@=NTIP>BfN=uP6`r-7sV(#Syn*fSxKXp4Opnv>@BDAjdj_d}o*!`g?gPTkbjZ&FzDk}2zvpu0#HS;!tdI3);fJOBr&Y`C$cgs= z9|QT(z;{jDQz%b#PP|TocLRT7dBMfmU-G0Z7ygMxo?9S4ndM)OS(7g^r~Gu}eFktI z#N$QlA^q~_#D`hh3jcUfntu`YRvi0z=>paq^22=i&V-Fi;0OKwxw1b@PP_-WRFp2@ z59H6hSx}b~?*fjWKTZVxlis~f7RnNS;lDI4renWC)+Y`4FS?#6TsVV~q9l9@@cf*w z?x3*u=5LQz6-mp9kJR8Jfp7cALVZzhPJB`;;ZOdqfdhEw$d!5DNDjo)I2D65?=n$=c#2OH;u8s6$Lb!SfQiXQ}HPm@VR7 zFtr;mwX2+Ga;4$7Z^ZCL5UJ>+oZpv-ewG3H->?4YtmvU0DjoH_|KaEoj}3Z>ZuwQ% z&Gc*e1~g)yP@F6tA)m(~o?n+v{~?OofjCv4D9DRJ*|ngq0k6-HKJlpM>-|ZcCjXdy zy`TMj>+cU|{73Salxi~HH?`VOYD3`e(NE_UL+n*R+Z5ZYcEeqU>?aQJ3G>2luSSb6Ibf<&lB`_W3*d@pP`xlsX z%7jut)xXqFwE0W~>L*U*jp?Y+F9Ky0O4%2buhFO{e$pc|kKp5c+1Gy6ix5Qtrt`ed z1HN7@c82qPB;rp-y$kny{yWv@0sDpM{9FiMzwWXv2-VwE@#=b^_WCso@|up`yO6JQ z1zOB6qHsNJJ|^^bHW7LM?K?d_4{~2OoWGZm2DvuyJu8~nov(Xk`8?jG;CjdfeCa2* zz6rK|6AhdRdL;tCqeg|6;mUX?`=7?849#^|8t|lp;xB`_l(2{2Ux@P5`hl;j$e-5Z z$iv10r{8G!I0WYnqT4{{c=Y&ie^b3gcQ8NnJsRs75Gv6*A9%eYYR|%{@_L15q-Zx0 zavI(pvshlQ@M_x67~6j)$C32Q;P!EUZt9%vcR6lEcZ04wA?&BrBFaX!WF ziCm+P773%U%en6`=20;V(;q zDEqDNcwXk`?e8WF7^)D`?7@UqDl(+9FrK}(I5T$(y{zGd1ETd@)I=j-+es3ezttQA*Otw{7W5I zw2=FA3i#7e?%v}wNc+MVwELWn{dJf63=Zq(1E1xLu-{bXXAAEeL-Ql8eS%N9?+d;t z@Wr4cx-u^5UD9vr_ffrs9sK+oKX-F{ROBS~9r4mZ=ks`tUlS#H^1cep%i~S|hhNO% zdDj0&*?R{zS$+TGNt(2QGQ!d_gs`L_BOpixfiNv75SE0cVHC;^yDSaJD9DH)5Qb8b zQBfcYXq90Q!6FE8L6`O|*Z`lvw`49OdPyN-uRn(X7 zGuX2E$F}l1h}Yf5Q^L+Y1I9he*RM%F8TtI&ckA2*R}w6wU96MU_cNq|A6QWKEMHF% zY{6IG&yWs&nOUs|$GEOi=>7{2_^)4or7@3dte@I1q-wuh@QD*1-*Ekx?I~LMwaE2! z>K|%*k^;gnbBCY(hR0zpkN9ePQovu>MEf+ytjt&6pOFr}_x0vxwLKIUYI}qo%6*uy z%LDmbq=eIW6O?|F-R{dG4*2}4x24|mab{wN{i3(j5jdX@oXqUeL_Qy|oECoI^Q;`!U+VWM#KrPPfg&vkv_An^CP~G zPUfrEr#|ps+VrZ$kjzYxQhl882cOr6z&|o4u}^&A{iewMaD4t{J|p}w>h_F3Vx52S z`4wLWvw=@FP}(E%oD=(db=uf@lE1aa^+G@ITfDpW?=MGuv_En`nGgDSZfrfO)!CyD znr(xAgXUUvd(Y|GYh0Xk{u1Q+oE7C*!PlHxldX4oBaIQa}UoKnn_aLr6$@BFqK0oX8*S1WZOX#Qe zRiEz%QQpUaN5(iO*R-HMnR&urnsdS*&9@zEBR>aby)JNmZY8N&^-a3;0(lGKho8p` z{#m4tHlqNyL9Y{O#|lf<#!0vv`RtE}dGEa}m+xhH?0*zXbljAlLo@h+^L$jbSEc*$ zl70*D5YqK^cZ^MtaMO8VH{bs-wDDidjlik>xj*{gM+^AfHx3(D1b$$z5?}3q8~8;Y zo0wSC&ddV;WI?YBypL*Rlu87T+MDCS+ex&;*#5&`j1>?39I319b!W_YzUX(49FXJo$Pc~HT5b<3a2L|zd*9H??U99iZjWLs z>UNFQ9)8&213#sva)0iBwFm4Eg8%rl-<^up9$x4*{VeSNyXVt$ib?HZMLySW{N3UE z`S~7dfAx6p0RQ;BRgc<%!L<)I5-i1l2LdOY%iU;Wo*U1L4hqaN>r;Fp~< zWb=PL*TdtzDJcB#+t}|m({nxYx{Ky%9`EIRTEDq44q744>o+HU%Y0hDWg?$?290BE zCtp|i|GK|{?@KVfE&55zcOIQ9;uigk^r^3#<)ggKLnfUm>JmKuOMLZpv!si{57S@u zjY?FFqr_KVH%kS7;?dv}#T=|zq{LTWH_HJ3i5GKg6<5tG#8+Q8%Lf0+&25{Puol*@ zzHSx(|IcD2H7IAG4n#_gy>g#4H;Qvuizl*>7!BSLzb$jx2Pg!%% zE!M@*&(A%jL$3$v)Mwvs&fg7@_4B@4F4{F0eB1eN;v;UB_Dj!NpbCs z6LBQRDUHXGIKzD)zf5bfUyC>++;K_xjpxJ59W~GCB-{m@=Tl4LRocCe7 z56*f*FUk9W^Lo^_z1d)cga;YNdeoF@Y#1-$n#-boJbv}s{?mm72{!}h@w;bj*AXLd zr5y`hf3|}E!=XRZi@3N&L`r;hKXQP7DE>s_qRzs6bw6^0|DfXQ^Aa6}`Rab;1Ha6f zp(l&k3iH+dCmoi-y_7ac! zg%!W$enHQ5!kjDEFrOkoaT`-51FA8Ao^hTLye6lu3wM3*AKD+ zsz*9-9!KhYSf{JjBp8He0_SyPg(}9A@^w!Q@NA^rSAH`nE~&6QpC=6)_2_&o`8>$a zeel34$?G$4T`I`er;aVXE&GwjM?dcC_oc2Xtu+^vpL|{TB^7CfBaOG{k_&Jn^3#!i zweE;pFX61;Tt(;^S*~hMEdAM#uW{V>tgJs1`MF5DT-Mj+^L_GfF6_<&?*F66y?Cj7 z_J5$2DBs=hF+(i>CEpNuIZc;WCI1^}AG!Z)l!Mm&sThA! zAkX7VI)2N1TKBtQ`yZgZBxb5INy;;7lm|0cGWh3SL7bfl7 z{5D@lr?Tjvd4bQrf?SW=LVobM79;iMFfHje0?-($?v4A}9J?J{DtJZ=TS=k;Oyv=`fIQ$>x)znWh~ zJ=lMBOKx~sC*fw`ydP7kS;_Z#pOWNL9HM;2?{)sFmKN(E!ukFM2lVuJRH(#$C)}kf zzw)F`sd18g7MG9v7pA{4GEUyNw=#~@pe-|8zF&at=If+?>TVgd)&l$aegw@O;fEdT z<|!ZZE5Oaj=XvX79dA?F{vgV=f|oQU@UwhBf;#>j;Pw1xNydNOkHGQg0)N-pHckKQ zeguv`FZhcdE;s$x{RkX?LGXv&%1A4!ia+Yt9Di~@rGD*0T$w_`Z``k~_$~9PU)zyS zo~3@^S}x)ywSti6^P9iMzCT-U75?YH#OHk!5A-nq&#NhK8Dj8#cpikGlgfphab9Mv zc*K{i-`-BtgZ-Ef{-blV|4uMRuLr~RM}KF2@^3=^)Gsg3ruR$8_7h)ypQauB7K1wN zQje$Mb$4aqA3h(=1fS|m{U(6&IldGAsL?}?>!c2%J^{#?%dc?gqM#qI-lY@4!L!SFlCVtC&>PK0~Crc>~_&dkkPV4sf=%OXJlbc_H|MU({X7Vq+kZ#z_jhwYr+%XLr{+&#ukOej_2|Al z*`HLOEa)?Xx6(B6gf!pk%?+aC>7|~5F>*X{eYrj}w>PRI*VhfbjIYaXJyWi)x;?$% zI~%6Wk5ykMa6i&EH#(n_>TA&4M|>lGZ}f7EF@V%LGea!jM_}_nB{zk43U#sVoul0{lbB-N9 zQLasRyo&h80ljy#UOak#)mPzRkK&7;yW{?_W5H*a<@KUhRiAz*6W`_fQh#>?_apTl z7x6gkkLg=@-&FJ-u@2FIXGI!9dU;mrErW}hA|?G!_|c2h{6P5U^cyYyig!ly!~GZc zS$N+S^{6`H-eMhSgu5Wm^Z5E1rcj(!5D4dfkOf}1ImO@S^^vTfzcbLOY}3-R{vhi| zd@uV)`ChKHzV-pv{3Yyg&j0K*uct_V`WR7fo?m*~_xG3Q7c=CnNP9J?{AN7rPvZ-( z+iWPu0bbd&e>f9V{vy8mz7rSt>4P3tG&+P|_%HF*_nmmbAH8+#GevC76e;o5_nid6 zZ@E_IEozPChy9CoHvKL9b3NgoESv`2ZvFhxphhp-UKKtAx_@3D9=uP@0S=JWgRs3fHvy>FIirx4`o&3gS4 zmLtC#wZcwbcYHKy3QV|Avez zb7cL=z&S3*)@#*Mu7Cck(fS{1=l?F(KV7B&K<#-qWc{hYGm*}$bNL6U{)Rl*l@0tt zk>_Xf`60DmF6+m6=AH)6zhEe6zsP%r^1z$FecRA@;NgCNxZrr?xZ(FNCdUc?-0HG^ zt!$SS`5ZUr-ajVCjlsb<>h(x5wMYK>LNVJ;XQTy@Om{5d1^mOj$|$g=&5l{1QNF(hEP>ORT-A-Y=x_(SiNw z$omh$Cx0rs|L1p?>3vCQ8A_j04y8RK{fgu&|If z1b}mU59pKEncJJELNx<`v9`sFJ$opnA|MK^{IgX6+!j8|jAG;W9zf2uR$>29m`h8`r{W5hN*}-4E za^%)n`(+$Q+`ht(%6oOtZkdqJK}xtX59$2UZ)#^Z?r-MnM;#k?C?01fb~w)T$#uoJ z#n(?Bd$WAH+%Dz>;RilHyS#k)n^F5;jN|;OanBF8>#)A3{>JA&4)FMX?={uekKlbU zQ5$hS%GaMX;Jc8{+Bd_>7;eBnYpAGrkkKgV(eQttXc$ILz&&$xLj`Nds z=>@o%?b|cniL(~O2ges* z@7y<`bdOm62togam#Qs^CHv|2vOg@vqW$qz>x+r9KTN=FNSnU(pi3-&_))$S zyaBi355@9_7d$t3d5v4oOO)E*hkTy5>cw3!@%`BpZ|dU@lMD0J!Ci94N7BgW+fRB@qg-Th88OaDth z6+a}Tf}e%!5WF99uFt!JWZlH4b)p~ZM8?vk^2iP~F3M594*?#3@0ab!K|bpvKH1@y z^in;!z4$p(uII9zC5OqfBv17Wsp@Ge8RZv!a*F8J{2kk+PqfS-SvutS_`j8>+%F9M zE~IzbT5jotI;B3!{si**Ju!dp{yOrWU&8$={C8 zuFTJYzI`39-lO|D<%9U@eat-YJst1#iBs_@4oqgz&b+QkDis|E{9Q|aKjZB#MgQh? zjqF#h-+$Rd?UWAvnMjYm{ZrI;v2&2m<6gA^6>r92ydinU`MTku!u3rd+24Eu zj`{TUCDR)0t{&ctB6-`F!d_nY4lqyYt#=7B;YkOgapOO`Cdzo03SYdn+_E@HKC8YM zPx$$@!J{6YlyOgK;a@Jl$(Q!_te@J?1^FECJb2IJ%emKz7=oIpgZQC(qPz_714yd} zJLbpxqv+xB%mKa~JYyMApV4g(K1lEt=KJdk{VCw5fdAH4Woj9{h51R~rGsb1b*djP zex)r^m|y5U+aAb$^UmKJie?qkU+6vCx!`Z9b7yIyyD(q<9`SteNB?oFNikPpzWP1l z$z_Fqu4a4QDDI5rQ@rFOUhUwW8u{|-5*dO={Uf`!@Lw*{Oz@_ZY|^!4dbB>`XM)G$ zcQ*KSntOVg?1lO1;PZO`1K=M&TPC|yYGHmV*9Y$#G?o+gRhT<^T!-9G83(3(QjER@p+zNekS+_eyp2VE{T~UCBAw*%K?Aou0yXp zW{l?3xXt64JPy-3Ar*GyL7vC$q{oE)GM~n63-YN18Yj~+PBM@0dl0ztyy^xqZt#0z z(hQHjV=np84SoFnmeFMo^p2YUfb)B5(i#st6se46PwCO+ zMegh8b;X`xb6zD`I>=8s;Bz@^f~L>7oNzn>&&GYQhGkU^7T~KFYU)7r$(1bzW!4lKuMqOaVzObpV`=c|0*{NxutoWSR+)UR9>g#WXU z@^@-8TlhQZ9HJclOZ;@)-|qn5htxF9y)O>+lKE!fR-_@M4?j86gYUDD`TYEv20U{` zQNOQ4De(sQHH!adl&3eS~#ZtuQ^FzK* z-wXbbcmJ(I-<#1gSxLj^U8;3#5PYI3?V%4g6!qo((00S0oxhj*H;sV{hst+zFi5b)C8#48}>gn{n)CE*o>p81=k4y=eTROq-Aq{-dyo#ybJA`h1B$fuy@Dkgek^!VJH73zB=A4;J^8G zr`fzuCG*YDYenh+Kj+5k8bwo?DN@p}jyE^>TMl)~Nlb~sSH+tT{P#ScT`QJcn6Hkv z5cto{9rR`Kq{4i4yqPNt|D-&5{k;;ZcnhD$tL8b%5!wI>2B4ON(Z)&bvd1pFG&-24C2x+!27^(RM4}QFvb15mfOxKVQnHaW8*`7@tj5 zgD4p#=TVFy#8A<_0w`}KjG=X^IsA5>hMj)*VtadGlBE- zH1YSI|56Ws6P^v6=krIVQ7h%^+qsNmT=S#7kJ5jfLGWbUxm9ItDk>!K*^Z5z4yB++Lwhiylb!7RVc;d8qk9qA`9>M1 zxcpSn|MKvA^mF-bSVrcX;2-Yq#+t$(<4)+$^Ek?Ung>!%LNDt|0iQTjKR0kbpNm_& zYX!?w|H%Jc$a8sIzY5*vY+#+tSM(V&p+6hx?Q;!Y;d&7sKtAse-fH^U$T+jmpy>Ob z_q7ikGNiTBX&X2`jqh#{?Pv;#`XxOn{LoGLY~{+t#}AN3vM&|+Tvv~;MPpH#XlHI$ zPI*sy*!Z!NoFFQCwA_xF(08x>o-5CFn$U*J@v6${{72s{ayhJ*Q;yFu%I)#YlgkM~ z-_B(xR~(!;^d^^+R7=>&_PA=coy_t|-v5mM;SB~U2>-8gly8g0EXN0ZEy@pCGwHSV1G$_$l|75kuBgchlzJMnfE$yA-F2r; zkL+7eJ-B~!%CYu*d)6Z2MB#>yROspSzCN{Oxqjgp;lK0@D{z~J{N{wb8|m}*{_AF) zdb~3!S8#m}@>4sBxIEZ#?tD>l7&iof^L$*wnKpszM)u|dPwyq>{XX04S7Dn7PpU2a z!2Kuro6S|?%%TKkUeWN}PdUnZs)!x@-`_g8Ot3^fT&Q0<@FzbUUO_G=BkJp<;4G2$$ok8I7RUdq2kZ{{e!hV+TzSQ~} z_ZgBm*NOH+D?_ajvb+Yk6=~(M<1WQZ`W>*JDA`VjKD4#pwZl7+WKdzqdR_Hun} zvzkt0F8L!1@)q!ZSkStv+#U|#HsF@2UlvV}{NV!5*Vkv9-`<$*CH-7J<9(;DjQVbc zo9l-(n7i((T)q?eex%zbEPssOKT7&j(9c7_d$w<1q6q3o{x-lFoN_Eo;Cegq*>@GspS%s#8Y-t6esEe9zuS%-pVmEX;E=TO_1mV8 z9X>d%eh=kCAd@D%Fnr9A`eO!;mWGM&ewT;KSLCT52J!pz%X2Gnd1QA6@CjhZ&uf3Kw=VV*f%Nh7RGjktPyN>v5*fFvnNS_CKa*(dNG_}IU zQ5PcZk%xS?xz&4ZT;a+nf5^U6;KusG{z{>nw~LttgYa~=A9zNuJxrlg><09mfyJXCj~dZynO*`B?tX2Jff-@63_?pNo91^8b@?4yQHo`#=3ZVdB6sLzJ6m!6pCOp`WtI|5^Aw<5KnOphfxL z3w*0%c{`;Z;Y0R+F7VJD=h0aH&jbEf`mtiN|BVfWo$UYH)uyM$@_#aTc`5U}vj0<& z&;GBM&}Pi6;`Hx_<+cEN)p#hiut>i6>5!S83UU-x-x*X;?sFHG^4{EV>IhyBC(%SV>g;`#&OslfUDgV$eZ{!b|hPiJ}T zPkMAW?(uyTiv5xI7_z@I!GC{xvFc@bl7~gaSNkg){GWzuXO@kz|H#)Z*k1wg4}I@w zT~6gM>bLAKxgS!$HA2qVRQQAYZ3=$N{P6gPeE8Ym_*|TC@%x!W^RHBmGYiAQaZps? zZph`}`|7=pH<+adPq0NlPu?K-e7(>MxxS6Q>(1A+WxkR5XvZM=o6)fk zugO`4;zsQ+!pM(Slw*aw6Di?Joai#8--_Lled+`vD94WrMla6wXcy7{6el_0^E}1- z91G)$$N2uB@|>=!9RtzjMV`yxeWWsI>-;|{r>+hPZ=+o2|uMGO`CdUHqW2b zt{KSZc5l~x#4qyw8y?{N9Kw;Wo_tTfe9C`!{0Q zlMntIZJl}Sb74KLOLbbc|Ab$Z@c?p3&4s=EymcymtH%Qe@=2cJLQ^ezz2e3FW&$tx z4v~L^=m*V`&VS42_49P_d3{`CtLH6~6$?!-wr#}m&>zg;PLM~=6A$ZNQI$XG&CXB9Nq7eE0McI$&N!R^oW{RoJP)7KTC`t2c)^;M z-bVOQ)JC*d&?V}dWEK7>^V+UYi%9+sz@MqWkG6hzuc(ak_<;M#cC4@6NN(>;$Z>o3 z`{!MYPLk*LOvQSmMrcv8&a4R^4sHDS!cch-f0-#&QWlk890wK2OAVS_3|@=Z&39~-U^(@nLzilSC3Sgf17a! za2{u7EZX`}$M?RBe80y9ydM1VeCRpvXGiNFqMzg^UXyal{u)1gSUNk3>Y;GMhY$LE zjf*zx{ba^{$|O7w`Ru26hmKfsxXS5g7&o>ReqcYfIAVror_MvBSN~_EYbWbZ2hM(~|NLk3N`CMEobgO9AJ^k`OSkT9S-#<)z;)Tc z8&HOF6dnKK_@BP&y^j7@>Sy5o!S8zvoE`8`XC+kNd64J+v99LF|HfIva9EzlJ7YWH z2V2Fd+qi#_{$%8HJg+FDDaQSRa31ec!MnNW?y7i6KaY2O-(A^`3*ON>3d+xf9FK<` z5?6H7NqDxZ{K1pI{whww(}CwA{kO!;)Y(m6<4$Y&s*q86@&g;VfczH`V-inuSj!%C6tWDKPxms6&{-ln=evV)Ly;*y75}pE_ z%YRV*y)JPQo{w_v;C*#}@u&m|=l;X>`?7n92Xg&9kYo8j2fz9S%ggbW10Khl!E>>t z5#?xbPt8AJKlMcJt_in)M2{PK%C@`s=w{QEHAxTI!|li4-)ULCQa!DkP=N;^ z$L%|$Z>7^Z3C{=4>&;z98(oW&aQ9xZ-sSPROs59(*fu%-S%0fhBj(BRlk$S_ryc3S zWzEjW@x%4cz&`$;wMI_TdJF3BfgHcT@=&+^`*aeX1DwZ)8o!rKjRUU4M?wzl3xLP* zQT+Kz`Fij~X<~n;(D?x5uCE#YiXn@cA`QnA@Z=YTokxZwJR1+5+&*0Y>bt+*r1-KO{8{IK@BPmjfRAq1;cuZq$RP!9n%0gBL&=e|t;+1n|Q3 z?JVrz^R2fI-+J39;m*lo9OZb>y7#n@;~`Zg|L^pJMRit9_#pl1z}cQBTmJeuj~9xb z|JlDrJB1GVtLV}4`>3*^@6$Gq-u-^=%Uyu${mAF@?l-RNt;QOt9+7bw?RW2q8r9{v zG<6Yv;Bi^ga^lBaPmcz(?fWl2ikI*t z>=U#6orZ5r&{;L%gYHWfeyKG+uPxUvgnBu_yYk!KG;FWsnY7ri%Nj@34ANZqBvfCtP71S?;eC{u2=WG8g23+n}Nr(@V zP59&0+JmPTcMCoIm-tQ|XE5Jc!2jzx!?qGGW{NaiKkyyk^&NQN&ywJgz7*);^_m;J zmBT6zHc5SfG!kDuZh67Ce>=}o%0aAxgUZjrx+e%;^*w)mTG}Bvq%RleNhw$lnz{-5 zyP3NETgFzPi~b{i7S1bqAIbuL)g1|OWv$VCDnA3~;|}ol?(S2i9C%^-v5&(0ly2}U zw^_aEF-x>Q;;Z*9z2HAqr(VwE=E8jSzGV>nnNR$6F3D7wuim#bbr=4a5$I(vA59PM zldJbFi9-9CIoNNsLf(m#@bL8y={NbwU0Te)9_$l7ySL41UVDVw5&YzBVqA{PJpPoP zlqm<5XIAa22UPlPWux^!_ua$2te^JD)$*)2A9|8{2tTACC7kTANxzkP>U?KJIc12T z92-9VVCY~|!OUEl5nNNO8SNToTQ`kxR6npe0y#JKP&pDeui>v^tU2Nd99hJUbQCr?O zbpq#g*D+(OTJpZBn{kYP7Z+C7$or;V;5>dgYc6b`fPO*#4&u8av$`!$q&gS%p0}@m zYu;GYUmIe1oEI5Bc_z8@vn}~~SFNd+u$Rw^YTlgjVW;oxjUlhI01t0qDVb08`0~{c z{QiA}Q-8DpXZyLHqvy`J&VC>+9po=R>f?l5{a-5oV1zxSPaPjw;Keu6oiAbztBL#x z^HuTT1HY@?Ub<-E_$c(!q#`xTEE}T~=O4*L&J~q>KD& z+9&!Q?-$qosf&U4_o-h5P@jCHygn{%8}OUDorv#Y9@3=V!p;qEnyMJgRBFLN{M2_v z`P@%a!JjcTjWS2{KvvKRlkQ`e`=!L?!!eXb-mQ8BN|( zTIeA>AADZN%o+H@4V_gG2v4#L`?#O>9Mry4oP?(U=lH(<?7Qa??G@sACTEImwipR8}j^qNRLm`MJLpU^*e!kkzRg%aw5l% zEYI&lY*YNv+p@eLav`KUT?=Lwk?QA0KEFTkx1{Gg%JQcE!hQ?VH8TUr2A}FfcBpa6C%IJc9BB7+NsjDr zNxzA2uP*A(F_H9xm`8*@W!%mXzw^HrY3oCidb3}{ete{Bf*`8wPePLI=Itvj7@(<`ta*WteQ9{l-`W#3HTIt%bil%X7ZJu|8gK6ZWy z{jc~(XCE%=$K`jMWQsrj*tzf>i3+ZDLY~WS^lW|OnoVU#LSE}umH%?>16?-%e7h0r z_X58{8OqTvrAxbBpUoOf|5N+0|9SlRz0T&S_v&Pgi1z>Af6v`4``_dc_Vc{Ft8Fa`Z-xY*7tdni~N;f4a4E{6@EXg8$6DK z%~PiKG=eAC;{1mBDX_~6xhp3;Yl>Ky8POl_hyOxIgW!Muwr*!pb78&>JpK-bX`t|r z-Kam2h;fgl$bLWK%L-n@J?{-DCXKI71$gAT569Pt zogY`bcMsL%{j`rhS!ueU4Qf`w+O!G)UNYjWU#D z(~?$I(zLJEr~k>mB>0*8UvAkl%BUp{!cD679sgm8r3P~W&hg3eWhV4Zkma2y-;K2K zm!5m^l01Kph~n>SkY z7t>(jm!JEkPU7<}ve%0I9H-z-(zZ_EIHLK`f^uv~9pLXPm-=?B`0=8BT;NTcTIVJ| zA427Mk)JwFl(%?T`{Mjvc*3)h??fElZc=}w+`mJR=lB{`vu0V^H=u*${lHB_guRER zIX^E2oa|x$v3?79&%A%3Q)!_l@;6*x)WZhel&1L)qUIy`m-THA^jR&}Hw$t(|eM=S>vzuU==_CC{&{KOg!}&yIUDD!w7_f&PXq zKDlm`>Yt1IKzSW>p6x%5YkbHFCLfc$K~6d;2zjtrUEXCt2 z;UVDM{@xJ_Yf1BSWc~}^*rgQw(!Me0b}jDuE7gJIEwGE@%Uj`SFlzn+&hg$&((utv6HYqI@s%Q_z1pU4Hd_o?qqm^@GRltFPGMBG02j zo6yJeTL}D1D~6Qi`I78)jurih+vm~6UQzE+u#OP*)!@AA^JjBkmgC(4oZDlwzxe>! zUKeoo$Ie81Uex#xoZD;Rj$dx@_)qmS1NR|K*l~O(#~HKYhHX6d3|OfB|M7V5!FaXZk}^P^&&;EQ zAM6QZkRkDI9PtBm`~EaxDt6CEy-(uyO7R*YHA%`M-Xn} z{tkS`yk^zq^@AJpm=Ac5>;+q*=5ydd;FYF)HTN;e{t%ykj}~^$o?NrkUVT1J z5S^!cA!ml16)E9#UT>FvlO1NfKcBBFcX)l(PA!p@gYh22A~o{&aPXVUBfe5^t!51Rb6CFMJ?vcX5bhTbY@NJDeg_K4)A-{7 z&U`EMot$3v1iufBxO5Po-wVcio#3xI@WxhtKbl|*KV@Klgr8%~lIpAYS#Ntv_>tek zzWckBU->yk>OboGak;VVp>_*FziF)SOYqBwE7=aht;px`es2Hz+v1W%jTJm{{V#li zres%6ubpOnP zC7(?5sposL#{pd96!tD|xOW79kDdJIY9such4l;HpSpG4M`yKGuBk{#p9OksNLyu< zyKGDqc$7Zqb%EC`H>X^Yl*0PBep%pURJitIQSf5vmaCjQXa8sW!QXDk zjl5ERYOMA%1NR|)l$$v6zuGSZ-i7WLOY!%>*z44Oe)z>SUex=e5hb(vy`$uBey@3? zzk^pVxAF)7^}bQ&JHWRN4{nV0zESn~;0C|G<5mxP->7`hc+KO3Jg(6==tn>HL7vwj zA^ev4G!7ak2zyCCjn96JJIpiB74wKJkO>>Z*FkzU9JQ9 zIaeirx!B?7Wjqsd*+>^W?LH%~lX8*o>>}#%QlsfJqY zgzrO8%GVkv3VV59vfApRkKS!m{x{gCO$N^UM%y>k*EHC1I9x^QC#k?|l7Mo&JT-Cq zwQ|KS(f=}Dn=+JR!RzNfjXRq6Ed8(GdRvp|`EO94nMVktL%|K%(C?cicyFA1Cxh&u zgYaC&ao#g%_^C9VIShw!Z&%@$Jn%l(9{Y;dnMs_b$pR5#a$}oG9j0ZlyF*S_@v)d zj(5HA55JH5qtyB3N^)dJrt~}9o_K$&1>Y^z{W$Xrxj*HAAHs8pAFQ1IvTSDncn;q4-+I@+ zI|chJ%JY>qqT?-JRX$&*yyTK`gguVQ{Y7phj7_j0mwo6zi+EHCDVKk2V zAZN@F_H(%@_^o9nN=oCX4f&KEj!%4Fnb!}aG%Y)`4B6{a+3QxxN8bN}`S7%1puIp| zr%$gH-L93#*PX~!qVhw~$A0>|--t6>X@4{F{uk&sO%--lczNeNwVz0zANnldb>Gq9 z8}4+NCqMiuaOJ$pEyg=O?_N0M%yHI9 z_0EUBB%If!B%W^|j{`~5gx#LO!k>KuXS?z^Kz6Cir*g@z0Q9CnK5Ms-x8pb0f%s&X z6Zt}3Sr4n$m%L6mH~RI@!XecqD?ef?X8HgmbGFKiF=<$!0LA^g#Fd4;WdGcybH zr@)?c@KeCAzi9at-mhUP(r?3gqLJmmU*Ep_2l2|fj@yT1sGai>?|k0p0iSS+M{ZwP zj^_19JfR#P?h~5T`)D<8Khi-*n6I*1GgH`|zgYW247=mic3Z%2+N)QE7*xu3ehCmyxC55MJh59hy@xqR|VYR%|zFI!!oe+ACv&0es{#`U2%SC^L$`5SxF7O@YwJo2Zy zJi@3R0j{S@_#+i5;fkMh4(Yez2VD-XOV5A!>K@|!_-&O;?Th2XYkdXRy20o3khM?N zTVk#HdoSV=?gh^0A=68H?#(ZjKMT0d54<>KD96sLSKgStb!Z9tpX>+$=k^x)T0Q4a zIs9eheiG$Zd>=y9C%^Zjn0zu@P)#bbScIvxGO#CC$u?a$wTVE?M~O|M7wYklZt(H_ajKmJ3xEV(_b z$Y*=r*nYyx`=S&F4&Z#AIQg4;Y4ZM|3pjrlqC{x-eBSpY`7GdkeWlYA?bh=PV+i*F z=Xl8e^yH5Qsl9`YBOX%UonnudaLpWHFUN85U!I=A`$eSR44mV5k+J0tdH+rwFIMoE zel{XUy?;mJjyhf(;8)xF&DTW>$4lh?O!luE{0o~;Zb&Q~FOly|aJ=}y|JA-qU(6UC zU(^pdUZUepuL&V;LXhV%(L7i9OXkx$HU;?HnAS|Fz%#&Szb?;c z|C~I2Sn-}X4|oG!cz+U)AEe)geG0x#{7kWjziP35Bs`$ffA{H{243e8p3VCuh>L~K z&hID7C(VnFi~CbH&XMJLA0Y+2w&Q1or0djr57sU0rz0ztZWq?We%6n1?Al}6Y^_x= zsD2*C;lDBd+zg$B+kxjG?bzBPzt1JXjQ42e!w&)QDmAWEfuA=KrG?i$k#ULpX+HQH z^P4n_b={Po-%g${{PgxmomWWLP4(`&(ev}o=@q+jd1PM(ZI~8J)|v?wcn+73bacf(Tk!ghlR0UYUh)!~*`9 z-W5y7SpP@P`||PKMF;qMZ=O9L^Slp!;`2T?_*4h7U-N6U{X1{`>Xz3#LGXE;+;MjK zGrZm*d6!E5z?_z?q;bq(enZ&L{m51);&T4>Lk@iY4Tjlwe=ViX1f6Mj57vym+ ze~M@i7vw+7t?8HRpM`uLCyYJMkCE%|0PaKDe9*Pucz&liR=0l;JZ;vyb@=;FQhP@3 zFNn1NB4Ph=|IrJvz5`XL{lVWh_N}*KeFuuqeS_MjemKfbTV?vcXa<@xbkpLYkbZGtWQVqPNjTakX< zYW8<*7x~SJe2(WXf0x+9;}zj<;5?qKo!_@9kGF(-f%AJmTa|caBabtL`+@U&KWq2* z4ddtS2oC|bOcd?Y_e$D4em+O>pQZ>KqonjcddpH_&xEgykzt(ln2>KpI?0^>B|nD~ z%Wrn@p6OI|>nuk{sEW4n4kP!RLOQiF}z) z_GLwttIYFH3Ay~a!p?n_;$D~HEppxSyGiS=P?^hg3xf_z`dRv4X-BQ*O<_OpH=J)b zf7;ulCrx4844n5H_Pzh~%=C9kMV`m70_S^#cNROJdnIAdDw3x-Z~*6ilRih(b5wdj zFWZLl3|83Vg50jLudI^nF?f-0KO*eT>Ug6#`z##)!1*~QP4z=1dH+bkbzI-tRG@N< zx!d=}F;0E>8VS|cv<&fpbvf5}@5CQ##;R|K?StH~*Q<=>jzaYbqP-lzQ$8H{1Yh^0 zxJgxAuW^A#bt8FR$MJhp_Z-@Jl9<$cJI3vzkOh24ZJ zai&X>ek*>7+}HGf8wZu==v8*5O8S&~N4~Sm<8Io6jPNrUR6eysWL`x(aQytQan}R= zIY=w?>=QNa<{_WsqD|_XjitCS7~c~1GrsU(%5J$GlU4Zm36DGl?Wo-Upu(FiPMaX# z2biwHH!OQ6U77B~2eo4+aGn>&uAecE@6U|ok8JSEZC)^uuj@ixcsy16pD-G4GT?_? z$aCMx$8U};;?sCzT2T-eR8L1o(SP~*$|tVn1z88-Haur&gWNA|o*FOv*@=Ai^N4np zn-ustPLrvM8@E(G#j_fxdWPqD@c8<=Uy`GE&XayC_0;*U3Ol%so?g4Z!uhuK!{_J} z?@23#-MsI@@wcpJ$zigOxcqEYy;C4hIMrK?Q+{~-XCCe!W?yC^UoI;={xd%;AD5v1 zu23HI9NN`vvCd4T6dcq(ydLLu-`N9)Kh#d`8D-p3cm+ohXZm`uUv1gH#4)KKBkYvIM40i27l1=Uk>GU4@;4LUSC@v z=L3K7uvvjv*H`kD|)FN_&yc> zu6zg6qHf&wazFAw?wRKn_K^Eg4)VDlb*YuvLheUN$-*A4M?fl{>{8=oFZH8*@VFl( ztuE;Q)Q>FEZ@Hd4Zq-=$Q3<}zLO6f_kJq!QE80FT&*v$)&xY~y)s~*+I)~*^UKY|4 zPq-r2X9#y7--oo`#Cz4`^)in~eBaZd`***HGn2L9cF?Cj6YZyo8{b!URmDO2d7sd{ zM)<+kxzlpFepb$JFZ5hlIlmS6JCfG`cObpj)m@R}oZ^-D>4K=g3%ny`kNqAizWIEF z$D=Ip&*<$ncs`Qr&--+K@P0o1%NIQ6QT_Y_MEtV886O@UDchGjQP|CKmQbTeQ8^CH zYXxpa>O1($;et3+?hi(}EFT>D$u(Kt0XY}a=N_;4G20RLAM&%1{?w>f@q&3%S!bx? z+y@@{faLkUL$<$`D{p{ozh<4NKkMH%;Hx97U-85Ld@o&k275VNPUL-!R_Hs~|JWBJ zmk%4m_2Bm@vY+o?EqPz|b0*|CjvHB5OYd{iMegt8e)h{?<084Aah&Hu&-~E*$UYeP zf!l%Q(;A-aE6e9W&iJMCEbd22oJP)rx&F!EWtO!Zq8kqepT%q(1}sIYOAI&4xy^s3FO_ z@jgSw?=|suko#@YJHiiKzqh+}dzJew$)^Bkf9@@s*uo&`&qw)o@J^qfA9-I9`7<5< z;eMY1-kmG`O)>U|3;Evz{{Hz3iWlA=R?ZusKNq~uhL*ll3=Kr}Pwt8HC-fJ);Z_6L ze;iL%;G^p<4axpbSugzK0{+LAQ$ywU4NemJ?cja#@$*|{{d~QT^?z%tFk9B|QR)Aw za?L)n{tVzbNJ}(se46_$*_VX;08;n5#1eciAI5t}+uzHvxrSW7q%2_{%UA7tYnCj} z?}11G@4Xg9Yx6ps^xKio&$(~>=Ir;}PK3LAi1IVQTX?+GQn`IR$mi#r-~OTDTE3=F z^7(8(c%%PnZw+7MSK2s?qum3*OO5>2&Cg)a{I4E2DKu#Q528KuA(!;7@B`uD`Cs}? ze4lFk<>!KlPva-|X-;{KGukU2RldzzJ!a$ORMJJ|m^KJ|xtvlTxud?LY5~sc zQR|=ABJY)=dTjD&Gm6YZ;da`E_lC0qwuvds!x`xKCOp6 z_=oLQaDz`(ADgLWkn67Ck^P^xv!{o@=l!2bU-W~dBdrZ;rsllJ|R_oOs|Xj z^q+7s^}p(4+9>?=@w%+x99vW$KlE9Fueg6cYJC+LE&90w_^}T!m6FFP7xH-?8MwOn zWIpdF{ke$KEbxj?Tbaf41L3Tn{n7dDNs;^N2@k6DzvwvBocDVP=k=jxld!MKy33b& zA6M3Ig&y-!%W=uy1}o&a{)c*QXeH}619u=@_}6f+Y@ZK$UBDY&d+Zf{UYYt6kBOY} z7&?0FkhD<~dP%)Ix_|qi?;Try>AHQ#Hb8voL&)bo(*DM}?-45D_%m%5e&BfB*m*(; z=8``wz}erAz4qp7vOjFV*h5EU{dwoV=h4g%OWId|^ z@7m1TpUU!n$T@&lThQ-c+20&bEPtqzHA|K^Z4vf!KOK0!$NMZ#?O}qmIORD-v`3Gq zQBLt!WPGzhZ`!qqzwS&g?#q$#%o1(%I%Q_oZDmdY*Rz#QhWFqM?b8&?br)) z{|o|Wf6rO_&j|T?hy}PNTiE^ZRQn&~{*{XNR0Q$djcHc%8}j+98FE&nPw8it=lG@i zg}6O{+iJYoQf^Of4{opgV!EjI%z_+`Q=?6%b=)4Z{X9PXoS)n+%6`bR{hQ~OY9`z7 z1Fm^r*uQP$4NWZj{TR2)zjASAl>LyiB8_{c&2-s*7xX)TKWKP;mi#=q7yfYpe{0j2 zEPkGx#%ohH)&)aFng!mi*?o#|>~Xx%x<~odM7bf{uf6`q{jK=^HsaDjeBQ6l0Y3%$UMkUL5#R47*n-dZ^|9V`@ZUTT^7H*~ z%nz^2u+HM^OCG7dN*w6T4MaWpx!;pdU+Km7>5(7R_2Y75*+X%a2mQtmgkS2Ldp}}3 z2v0#ipFfQ>KDAML?zaHP{{6X$&vliq+eg+VD~68vlkChru)19B_HAACzoK93fqq_> z+{rDq@^DGJo$(ytye>IaY2e&JZ|x2*w-k9@060G@-+#5?aPY0N9>^QKBgMST&!5g% zqS+YdAXKbFl0Fo6^L-N^cHZ}w-VuhWeg@m9X!##TYW|FqaJx#r>w`=0$nt#tz~%2; zYjNl#d5=nd$DiF-v3`m-cfKe;2Rtjjqwv>{?T_ibny7>L8t^l~42Se7d+}e>iQ;c z7yj7)^77-w!ckeEllbcTrh-4?%4GD@TraOpp)uO0Qx2JiPr zdp{`&9+j^izXIUx*fQ{-DLGmn@zvu)KKOfz7O|E}D$G}pU&%X!KelZgR;)BHa3MzH za!_@iND%F#=VF|(L!QqMGx1w16;1o-S;(hs>gRkNhv$M#HSRQ@fBC77ge!I>1i|Nh zD_%#OZ#<=wtXt?)N>{!ARpS+Q30%4F?{V>)^)!0WGN1K?#|7~7@CO>^8Fo7 z;QU-#aNzU`yw67RZs2@Wu&r+6Qj+9?U|eP(;S;5WNzug~jHsw*Aj_d@n4`Q&#C z45MLr}V zKhL*9{-=&>zSf0EyU_1JdHnsM^%p$V;v}5UTXMjA^^g5G^%Bnd{m?)B%K7JX!La&p z{qrHm<8SMd4}Oi4aMqvnvG7OZ#AmzdB|P6J>TSfhJ9g9NpX2-m`t6Y8_b)scHP)|} zaMqsz-n(nAFEvPbWd9BNx9=&rT<0s$p949*p4Y$H2V3GKob?C5+udM9mR`awUyAzk z_jm3$*;G2tTcAH_r?8vnzqZBRoT8U-)}I1i`@2KR8YGw&tuX|Ut(>69pcn;%8t6R%7 ziI?=-k)O0n_~H9Axu zO8J;6QmTKTi>N=>Cma00FGn<`y@mNX;PZMT0Dhuva*Hxqh4~g0-}s5J_rawfzbxx6 z%;)<|O^{0gzt#&k50!Hj=Bxdm4t|~dCD$Kw7Urw{?*V^!dh;HSI|}pF{?7$}ZS`LU zC)o<~)&9>1|M@Ye4dtzc`D*_se=7X*Nj2kl6)c7MYX958pMQ4evWn)ye6{~G!GGB1 zmbQ|qFkkKe9PmeOeBtvaqUp-`AEz;^=J`DEiAwXAcaNC2cz(+n|6yx+eoM&__HzHq zt$lS7_b)|WZ^ikT7G1^Mg z1PQkT=kfW+xebzy5}pB^zaRJ5N1y16NVo?$&;RBshsqa~@EqVge}DDSvm@m82>|E$ z_oalp8hL!o2hQ{7#>}M+rS>x3Yc{I%el3XMuixE(mpKRK5# zG*Q-3;SeDI+2Q{T@SYEhn^+3C!up@zM}9GFV0iDH6e)Tl*PU~qr^A6BuU>EK-$Xd+ z;cG^m@;>VDF(cZKdnG+>lrt@IA%^q?p+~bv*uQ1$u4QwYt&O~=#)5odiAHmx|KcN5 z79C`l4LGm+%6F?aGtkDKfe67+%9h5-0w>MvZATnE_@xG$Jv_B=3TiiRK6eb z+^+^)K08S6H@vQ}V_ll{>`UwA`tiDj`_(63^lT%q3oUzvUpVf*>HFFQd0oi*ZQ#Au z$!|0S!|oCONfq-J_sdT%FWs;67vOHlaoqmX&uNg?m8{k^16`qoAwDiwY!HjG58AV$Nu4Q;hok+%gO6T8|1j(Oy0BZ!&vJ^ zCwLbRjQT=eH}blU$CVZ3cHGcs6_oE~{pfdZopML^FR1<9!2L*_63OM1QThK))Y)dEEVJTIc6=?gBgn zoX6b{zHT)wPQp!J2)lXQz1Z#g9eG`C0nYJXzEYPYd0lM-&hh*6v?^GWA9E&uXq0d->hA^bJ4^9CMd2S>7xMj7Zt(ozO)LBBh+-z;N8yd| zx;FBB5RWGz@B>HETJpHVe5!v4!(=#!wFspyxmWImXjExf2h~trh~#i@7!wO)C(c!>IWGDmwo2@9FnO#XsYS|MRu`{S+1dz&ZYBY)c*&GycJ=-lI`p zIsUz$aa^m6>B-D#^e35C3Qm3qMS0yt7WM_{~849vP=R80RmTUu}@H|3AjA z1U{zgZBHhXWFoyPTgM#*v?Qx;z~x=Vvx>&d)z8tknn0Pu+20 z|ChVUT#@tB26-d!Q}31hQqE7FpYyuRyi&I1^7UdHiqJioOn@^`-ZpMG+F zx**T_8P%`AQ#n69z}dfHE9>5q^D`Sb`?pK`(XYz+smsXU|4&cyjt!QdM(~=S?$|U~ zej1UV7Vzd&wH^wVpUQO<8~CO+2_FQ@PY2rX1h4q;9rJ_bXD0G<;mFUf%k%qe){p#r z;n=ZTUbi&-fa4>s+qPR}*dphj@w@!~sru|U-~BIn$2SY($iLdBkM)!D&jy_H@3&F) zV}j+M1H6Tw7EhG(Pls|B_NJtZzVCnK)t|gpw2#k!mf!lbtGsS*SL9d7#_#IN`J?+@ z$aDUjk2{bi=Z_IM=g*#7=Lg97V__Wqv(~Rq;)CUn4ZNM!0o#M+j}H0c0Izo6t(}AA zk8<741%63Y=fq(7lMTOl!CPDCaGPNHW5W9Phd(#|G2i*w3E>|-@+anwE?Qm}kLUb> z{Y_pUc0$e%8|3-Efzrh)ZjkfC0i5%rX!p+hg5`$`yxmi(mzDFwf^rY`4-X&cE$0W1 zPrNQ2QD(PE9-nk45r5e6ymI9pa)#_mm zmLCrA7999HGFX1_`Kt@O8#O;15G+5G>%boH&lf#p4wfHA;Hp!?52h+LW(3QR6y(Ri z&}}oroYL_Rayh_1+FkREd|k!C`GN7_-t0~n^2ML!;hzz&WV8z!fAC^H`?HE1e;dj@ z*iSYt%Qt_rVf^Ivg(bJ%D=A->ax3Ed`{9XtIex|;gkSjl=$9%7Q-j6N0^a<&?dAlF zAFof?z$-iDmp#Gar(E}UfL~(CH<`iWr{nfvzqy;GsvJMgf4=VXN}=V;Lq+&hG(Xp! z7WVP_!B$IWw|xH3>kn}_k28mMP>0~W!9Tx;Jg>j)k8g5FE#Wrce10~h$*~2Y67B%b z^IJ#g1NX z`Qv4TJudL-7noLv^Mc~R@7c&gzdL@Q*t?O^@zM)9)sMpN#QklT%K2hIIong>qwOo? z^^R=hnHjtxD-#RK>)=+D^LRf)vv{Pu4xWvEY6tJwo$Hr)9h};41nvYr@7H6`ic0Nw zvwn;hXT~({SWLpRaUAf1S0ipyvsWZs2V8YV*uQyPpD&9`xB=xnp0_biUQt5AJvg44 z!5jXtL;I34j`@}q_|V5CPx{`g;SV9%XGb~DH#YRW_E9MbxA1%qyz!|kuE$8Yk>~rs zSL}M@NNEZ8qMYZ;D|9^%m6324pYQx6?Eky9w|!X&x8Z!$0Q@&g%$RZ#ZbmtuPgZ#N zPxtZ??!tP26}%RPZ^H}{ZsGMT;E|8_UauhGPL%U{O!-p%KdUI=F08k?!E0o%^KB&w zPr>yJFYuIlzs|1=JXn8I{Ve>jX}f!5m2B>5Vo!YKcx(XQG%F$gRc|0)dHl72KX_Qg zo~k%+WGT|GoX^?8KcDnue5{+9Vo!YK`GX7mJ{g{vYOX-O@_g6}e$|un->&Wq3=u)&Zw%6*Ynf;_lGI3gA;|WkLz)LG8^)S^TH2=`^ImzN&4*@ z$JA*h#r1N&5AWiY!WB3C{gmh`U!F!JfY0}LI5A#7-Cks!7!CbY|9@1!S#fn8Sw0>(e@A?L{nXs=c2fO%;7QoOe=p`@INC@3T6v#e3V0Wbu8QI3N!Vj_ zpP$lSgwcI|>98{$@;uke!f*B&@##K4)rGt`Q#&0u#d?5utk}=X-V_&VAU5TRT4OIO z$`df3@BIDp8+_k6$y=e1kDrA84*1UkevxlKY98$Uy;kHs-{)@!pY)Qy`F&;V@4N1%S0sP?mO4Z~ z^xp{YlR47)#?iWmX8Z>EFx4H=9**aZ2XmrBErbgHWurdbC1IBt{6CU5j^O*(1>4Wh zy>FQPXM~*nhl7>FpqKfS4<6{Zf;aV2S9^H8U=Z#=IiFv>*Q3D92npwT41Z^6{)8UO zL#%o7$yvfa5A;0mX=|=d$iq1wSoW-rUnsr>aG*Oeh*2(r7z4`6^Vq56nvb{Rs7VMv2+>{v1-fXnr2Hw2V zJMF>j^?>I9@8ITN>K2sZ>qa?`N8yzpeo+WGjTg$}rx*MytylhCIF3gOv6sgeK7OjM z341HdE8baW3gjz~pGNS_p`Bk8i4Ei{kDpfXmp2-EyQn^puRMM_z(0Sx^u}V^!1tx{ z@iRnHMe`sRjyrD1^E@aUzhyqngS6L$-K2){ir+KLoi`o~*U%x87HS$4w?akMnWhCu6^)d-c^C12gmV=f(l^sC4jer_8P! zrVHe=U-><>S>Ts^vTRAX!ml(Rw=3o)`WyNE!|x$x|GYo)wQD?&BmX6U&wi?1|Ld8d z$UnmQJ;W@(ymg#D6n-H*jpZ@VtafQ!9gT!11JA(zd{(n<@_UH+J;Sk2#Bt=*)aprc z`?NRn_v@28t6q`Ymj%7C;EjA-*c*=aQ@>HhHx9hwi%MVoulEddd=tR$a%u4LmwC@{ z3iy9)?YIAB-ZPv5{?pgjEDiRaVUDld52)Y7!R{Q$bH9nbCHy7xso$7UP8mmelT$$W zn|VA>B%I#AY6m|hEI*I=yeB?yzIwu)`RehF`)!0gf8Q-}(Yzxp>&qXFt$Kd_Rnn&B z-WE>zl?8p;+rqB*s&C1Ck0#-*~cT24z|5{E6Fj*Mr0_Tp7O<@EhM;ULr{R0@e{Tz~3=)VZ$Kt3s^_Y z0Y7HNYi)wWFI*YF*t^2sf1-x23KG9?W&Gm7FW>IMogncGxGysq{KU%bswv|~>mSPa ziMWNTVqr%*6R+&7M>RlkaM3%>6-kK+rk3muGoaUjG%s5n1P#&KMAUmVYke~SJ* zd+(=})n;PlZIrjl)0{`Hlk;7l+xbFr3 zwZ`wn1Uv4#6~}$uZ~6SC$u1`B=kqsokHdufWdG;;x%%}RJ7yq}e4B5a&3&FF z8Tv=|TU4t}^i}^tGT|&fTGroB1fN_-LN0#>h&r}IKso1D-6DOaj%6K+#cZk3z z?^^JKvDD6uz}31xguRy*RrWtJ^X8|EpY45h-Aa}>0_XQqZ2hCf+aG&-RAbx%oZm}v zu6N0!m&ba0v3?tHzj9yUJJs4%tup1oNZ^_rooE;P+cxEDW5Q^o=>}QSmMZ@p=F{w0K2jav1i@(3&0>9*gjkW0AbDTe9 zHyt09{gcY6-zT6ycp#sN_w#EX1n>6-lneR1^=bK8kPbT_JD5c)jn($4@n}RGY|uEpQj)?#2JHIZVP?p1<2#cyZB^vb+a!+1TIN zQ9~CFc{&~_*C%ujg&%4Z9yB^aFWSNX6Q9qc*?uGVD>gjruT|JjabWvpzfc?;Xpa^0 zJpMZHTjtaFn}%}X7vJ~A72|K_o1)!>Q@u)@%BkKg=rLJEzu|hdkN!veQBLyy{)q1` zb3S&@2~Fj;QoL=7c3Bnj{5@-yUsL$umwEDPjY^ZhKR;PhJYRoyLm&62ao1ne<^DwR z;qO_qelPfcp1fa7O-4u?+2iE)Jr?$_snxXw`-J?cw1>pWk9NozA;&Tn{AQboPw`7Y zIsNw4t4?=|y!RhSd}WX4v{`dz@yxdg_t_DV20q)t*PrGzEO$)SO?>jZL*e%fsXp=x zzek$&@%0MVvunA}Q<5&)$Zn-RDkr;hpjZDy_=~^K5{KV%+sJM!%1NI5t-^O`cs;$^ z#cFlr;|uP`hty}+J>uOH$z1ZK=eD>ad&aW{Z>HZXU z?k|@-nU70k3vCo99uN3>pBemwiT_%H&97aG@z4f7=_CJSj2HRO{(12F#c$+wD>wM; zr=wN9o8)yX58iXk@-<6kKjHHZzyJRd_V9U6v$U-id0ov5{RZ$h=bY3BTURq94s}+y zZXmbM3OVkd-6p6i$n7%&w_`tG)9N&ycT=7!gWs<0^OgTO z-{$MT;P(iP-u++mZH})YNBGa$FZyb*`8LN_?g!Lwobam!@;qMH@muCozezzk=LLVi zi{B&USbi;zWhkzEpJFED>LuvU@pwmg4$9q_58kdfIfC0jnD>A5<~v72C7kQe0B^(OcfQd` zxU;rs7hm@-yR!PGP-~uk?K9}ddG`KVw#|IKpW2@Vy|Lh}Ker?{OwykWJPvrL*oQ;I z?RokWfF}SynGpYLghSvoZpHz(*A(qc2Jhm}PEU~c!9}E16TA%U)4(@R>aL;p!EwB) z2GXAl9v?R|!QWa*d%J)&ke>iPKgXo~NBAf9nr%sxC6FJ-?ZJC&OyCdF&n*;f4&BMItoa5CUEXg4_wysQ4*d5ocqIf1zoM8C0zfnu!q;J?tj<3eL)E~ z0q6Ugc6gKf6_W6H#?fDA%^usWu!JWuj{bJDUuBI>!c&0rakIzGPkt$qhlhC3Pk0?< zK-;bRfB3t#e{SsaZ%8KOc^zcw>d~j$g(s|r|3h-PeyoG^jcWVh$1QgG-%;a}SLpTl) zlyB2NbyzlVbq;X0?@^n{y?=Tyb`#6%RTEAu9IaBZeOZGNPYil}-A|00fU|ug&b*kr z|3r+F^~VFRL*S&pz>bdR1pXqP1FI!<>z2b{D4frrMhVc~E5BnN?apQO0%=NPv zPY2HSO?}dE^WhZ-{D*LgUnbX&_*GuE>*7sKw3ZN1){&3F>)hkYdy z!#}(@xgS=-8i8yvhXzP*Q>QCTd{GJtl4&~Kz#e0W(2=&_^ z77uwIzic4|mS`lLze|$@p3U&b#V`ry_pI=9EEC@7dpgwZS5N*8ONShffBikXH)$lC z=L4DGg?4?qE=!e^d~`%$KQ@0KN+Zz@Oa=U*jK99BRWjdp98znfp5Qicw4wTPk##VOyI8Y zgM}hw|Dv47?~BvdnC17paD3Q*?JR#bm;Gnb2>)>Xt6Cql%Js(s=kv0GwJ)bfNbO_& zCbZ-0Kdycu`!5CZDZm@{JU&RaKb`gC_))iW@sGnL|6~H^V-E8NrVSzwZ}`tD?{@ znV*F5$%%0?8T`g^+KbUnW{N%OPr-Pu13w-7Vzbx=pT^?Pms3T9G zaz3gL7k=p2d-GSt?5rt|ubj`Bz&~7bY57-d`R7m6Ugdl)0sL)O7xpf04dg55b1C3A za+dq5ge8!#oX=%|-+k$X_e+`s`O5a^fL~#9%w)YWkgsfiY=rR7(bVOWOBn+B%J#>D zf4H~jQH(B-uWWxZ_@`RmD_+{?_7LAc-sn6~IUgmA=Be?R=cPkF3wy%pd{d+~2zR2K*Qds}-7+@RAZqmKd+ML?`F`@A=OZl= z#|(aFaQ{Jr$JB0-kT`7M;MyGqk4s1#$ z+S-D*V*iTS(Gs2jc^7!w@6UXrpoDu+&i?B5?vkZ+en=a|NBMovZ17t(`8SNt3+0X4 z>xN%+QNkbhZKdAU83c>`&x`TAuMP$OkN*cJ*+%pq)qh;x$C-R`6bCEnAvF{S7k+P_ zdaFHDtEgQZ2RHByqZ9T9i$f;xw(fnWg2f>R_;(w!TFG(HM+j)0>=@YH^m`NC;XJushR)Y5h|DaLp<;|Q^)KH76%*f6;sS_1&f0N_|vLieJ{ts zg>sI=^ub%&28)9SygM&WHI(C!jdG5|s7GUq|5qGzMTDL8I((KHEDo9QixIr_&r|xo zVjypbL0_Sut)D~>mGd{WL=?BEYt9aFl5P@DTd&HDo8EB<sP_;#!V^1LV>@|R{zok!OZ<@N;QCxgH9PNmV|KFu0sAh^=7UC2S z`DE+~_vNM9DgE}3FLOC&hh7)<^9$MvQrzT?^z-$3=Nj}|@FyPr>H8?f{W=sMBl;EJucRv> z>?OSvSEu6s6e{=C6RvERW1XmP;F$^Sg0w65J|b>c66$$-YkfVnOWyqL!g*LEfHXzB zGVxo^!#Guh%8YWW0%sndck(_*(#vh|nB;d4xbEu7WT#m z!Vaxo*vD-kJ{>0vD5u|Kmoom!>(fT%`Ls`tu1{MP`nevCi(P?JeZ2YF5tgE8heeU6 zdW_Q~L;i8{?+?W|++$8+P5C|yZ7IZaiooj~Xl&NRi5f{h7C0Xt>I`^LiSGlUe7EEN z2~$hqzc}z`U*6j$+`sz4trz{nggoK<{1U+LarwIe5wUq(`iu1QxRBmV=uZJZBDBUe z?MvL3mjQm~D3vEt(a$MA*nb=cQLpd*IQTgS^4u?CV}j?08RaBTe&hR___?;PYJIsS z6yp+&NBkU*Dn|I7?_XLL_1y-wk+kG(#OM24?5M|y{fWcF&Ig-!u-|yz;Q_zg{IN@D z-XU+KpT|eOzeQDA*m=73@khb#U$QCk&Imr~CHwjQCAPoe^J_=s`-AM@b6%aVv#X$- zmwf*c%fElzeM7!~$<6Y}?|R2Bf5!6#f8GQ4V&5$1*gno%!uh$t6s%i0!b&!g+h-^v z?C1H&yMsTuF1Jqw+>HHOB|6NK?_W~J*9zYDYG+>iultuczIN98*R|#^bN`YH{8txG zx%V>nFL}ZLW%G#E!R}w;_$vE_75>zf75?FVVa9KnPvd4h$~iCi`VoI;wpYi$ztA8V zDK3ojcTa1F&b=q&nHWF#dD~4J8;Z#}@-FRjF-~Nn-W=oP@@h$c4$5P<3100_h7FYU zCruT{YkfIk-)~u8Hx85J(;;sH{&e8+do(YnjoP0AJRbOa%U^Ls2-t`F)>#$v^(63E zp05wFf4W4Kds}W_I{2*r$j2S)<>~jm{{}dJm$rD~AU97VsC}%T{rhKuY8_?$`trhV z6Z9_If?O&z_DKvC~93A1^Y&?|kafK%O%p9R7HD?Sh{J-u>@9)e7Xs z%lEw&;IRhbm%TTO=xCl#8?`qM<*J!N&l~SgkB=6xAGf2N^-nf8EiUU%hI|I{*7am& zA6b7A+Qs<%=!V_pcyK&3py$`NZ6?X_$U?bcmT2GZ^=aqje8{wla+bfXP`V`rs&UMr8j=Wai;oJ$@$xty}ENpc|6co6z$^i;M|gGGv)Th0%!jZDEsLL zaz1CF{y6ZK9s2Qt9AEYyxBsgao94*=WB;Tt5$(TO?bx{xDSy(Sm+kA-w)J$m{mI-u z?8lBe&|UUVmO@@%?#NWxKN)j{f0ALxw?|Tcm+gzKB>cneSbe+w>U{A5&hdLYtN2~n zz69Xh{vtP5AD7#gGEdZ>fck43QJ0YYp9XpM&(UeE+RN?B0M35w_4M^ia{Kgy^6P&x zwEF>BzcyOn9N%tLesSl^-^#*%&hG|K${mvBxl>M0ne`Eqr7~N{E9Peb{IlwoVZgiFN zRbNHe>s~0@{i1i8rjV46TF9Hg+pF)>sxWY0-ah5F@Sbf*9Mf;ynDK-COrKwJpZ80G zp6X-9*sFd#?iV8XaE%k?+!yXAn({rj?*`6!(W8gq9&^d>@xZ;vnNOGKyhk|? zp{CLNBn5J+s=_Y@>z)eyV)e>HyTfUU_8&Gb=e&Rpl3dqkZdeLq>@O>dGhK9pF>KDrA5uMNi0?*M9sCupi|lPkG`}=rv*d6nNfoh3`i?Z9d0`H=q9lk1OoIrCkdTmFtGSFfZ3% zTiCn(PU`n;FXgonv@D*fb;W|NB$ntP=5a12AtQkCRnS!%k#uw?R9`3 z^2bmO&u6Kvw2|MH{-JWpJ2&ibL7tz>^s+u8VxzpvK{*xq+L4=g=}wU^cDvYLUD2)< z`-9~vPO4h@`=hCj@E>s~?`%;5=lHY#&Tgu;I#}Luy~)sHJkevdvR<-ZSufS+KaN4p zg+15n#cw(Ge)~}_?PL8czwXSgcYbTuArW{;>}$dvexBq)*?TST?N7YS zcpPxPU;nks%k7=c?|*~!Cje*r_YL`F`t`m)&SUvx;B3DttxoA75KIu+n>Z_CwBEum8oB40e`u8`sNkjYwHTTfBmNBan3*L z=O&bM9-lAvY!HtF{`xTAvtXXc&slC8m)MSTM6^^Kui~LE3HvIauQ|ZuMlgN+-iMp& zcXQ97WPNGSlY#x$i>o%5$C)hT3;QDnysba3cob}$iBse^)#dMJ(4()1{J{E49Dd8T zQa`hzoa8C*+_&?O3sFzk3|rF7b%$|th?ob@c|K(yl|5|vzN_$-p8k8EC@-*G0Q|e5hQtZ<(^SCT!sP-6KT%xc+%b z!)opS=9_J--wb)Kf7XmG@1H$0!mp0nX9dpvHuaZ_5ucsjxs~nFi+sxKCoYjyiF0{k^k6!_D_w55w;Ks&$S=&E#L0ZT`l2Gl-sfIQFed*PzleqA9&pI0xdPb zLwxH{9CP0D*w%l**zscqsr(!DQy*7sCSh-%65mcfe(8^7D)ix+Sd{bgtnMFsLO{fs z<79_FE?idqD#s}f@(I{Ketx|O$BF!ujB<|8+iNE~IX;B*`v+P79^*IDxoaz0+Yv8&OS5qWtM&i&F0KWg6;e(3&cZMW8(YpVYbYL6AXSnx_mK3fq9 z9^vsQcjG!;gKHf>C?MfUz_~qrhuwHHO2SiE9@ljnUW_O~&r#Dx$3t#!?zqGH^et29 z`DuBR`8@7qf`7Z9Nxz97A0x(Z&fmD*V!S3kyNA?A93c!Y^r%oA{#6 zuPjG?aig5a*Y3Nkm6E@&;bk2Cu+ohoi`8+|dJ$JuV_`2J-!IzR_2G3?I)3nV2^Z!G z2Jk=qXJF@G-_x-77VYKxP0Zk1YyaMX*1cr=NI$RpGT#RNvV(mR!hL7*O1`_7(C>g< zPVlch>DMhno1ag4nT@=(g6{#J>?gmcw9fBeWx1hAzI@PR_Z55-%G1LZuax6qK{?wK zR;&G;5MR4!qj=eX^E!lQas9=#F3PwAcuqf2k8ADIN}&?&0`A85L@G3`xy^r zS^wnJ33**Rn{nhr)U6+%xhwF~HZ$-rAwa*Bg$L%`0rTetNX&hAMiv|1& ziQcqGlhDKe6JMDxHt^qiT)|NwHh(;cugn)G_*ZU)M@9waOSm#$Jm8P1Fh48W=QlaO zC?7aqEERPdY1Ed0ag3r75w`81Bip&W6|onP4diSgv3ablSVH|l;$IQ4^M@GWVG zyG85`(_X*Alg-^SVSDjz;uxIc!E@0V`1Z5D##F6B`?_&lzhc{Zh|TEhAMo+R+fUmN`!pI4AP-#^0g zG5@BA$mb>LkmEeueC_)KVFqCa$+P}U@b3QeX5VlL*S5iV4f@HX&^~0O^h3S ze@Y5?d-`>GB~tQd3hK)M9@1Xdwg7OdPnlm?;I-YSdMnDnHHkg(mHDM@A^ef!eS1Q* zE|9OxFBAC2CS4Bmv6H3z$4y0k5k~#Y1UnK~9@i67@SF3I_|(r_D5u|)w@!uLlppiv zLq6H3oa?;jzA~WyAX4GqeDTfguez4P?!7HWWJD%pS0@6+pX07i5&dLU=^y5Yz%PVn zjT7}U{>JbsWx4Hy$3t%t_G8RBSv*nn;p(IWq4&kL-wu-8sMEzhTD7;iZ^ZJ~ACe9^ zUUzs}@M$gm+3*RBX9DMShaK;FHk|L>&wu(u`g4G{A_3pF_osW$5*ie>(BFi|56fSF zzmW^im1_1|2jC&5R>+5*g17T{m2Oia{yo5WJaDexYUp>r&DMu|S$`7n)>PozF5UmP zMS<;)s?y&+d!O<(c;0i$jY@2TC*|7rA30!9f8z7zYjAN;YO76d*?>(a>Yj>ID}h(bN~4LqN)~;7d~9g>uH?VWom|wuJPrk z^Qq-NJjB8B$g6taH{USty)PCs?gGwv^=O0odi&jNd7WJC0q$S;_6co>vNhXOWPyd` zWq*5y<&V#~*X|YO;{$PNBYUz&iu~5a34hc`E8Q!?;D`OV8RhQbLSOliIxjd5G>&GY zJr>kw1%GQ!^%cSVZv)>B-jqK_oGmE%*M;)TRia%#PyhLGAqn>Ycf2RsGq==*?tH#V z?+-Si-ur$F|SsR!-Vgbe=bGygb9#}PO9a(n6gi_7aizLv=I zCp!Pi0sq17BRhEBPI4=*h@;q;G;kV4Ec~J(+ zDPR14*em)iUx#{@ICup23&OP>gx%T`A|Jj|oll7*Vc$mi=vB!*BG%Cp`$=t;mnS<*}6fm8ZT?KI&1ES!&{YCpNkwo^N;ighTDLOw+;+L<&> zj4KuEf0ZepSHuF>brk-XestJGU#0$y>NlcXh3f?SY%81caf5Kqb2qMAG&pGeLM_SL zAkXXhrQExEg-W;uxC8q)ej1-HA8(v^&Y0IdtIs{uh_AEw>enQjM4Z_tLwn7R6Rj6{ zkPW@upT<727Lm`}be)9VeBRae%y*6D^EM-JKE8kb-5q1T^ET+WfVcPhCM!QjO#O}5 zZP|Y|@an(y;!XCW++G*^1H3;RAtU(sO8!m?7x83&B;THHll`GwXMONz&J_>f5^WE#q}}|c(*pa-;n2VY`;GqigoL3@R#=f{URT8nNR&#*}n** z@hKbq%+Oi*lfNTi!Eeq-;?ww)fN~)p_}niaPxdE{n<~o^pZd9~PX0Vklk`zPFyi?d zzTct4;PSce@gckUxj0@A`S1FC{Tll9?+E+0s5%tq@s08@8Q=Bde$y-D#ss-v+q#PO zCP4n=i%l;$zSN#H#rt5B!Ryv+;Z=U_g>0vd_{!(D)4)H`Aic7GawMp^eC2c7nc&y& z((f6M^DIL8mCtQ!y9m3VUpZ|kz(nlH{y69}ffq94S~<=i!V^%={lwv1|0kap1dB&9 z_y@O_ydP}+KpB5(3guxY;*L9%iGQiYc!Q$Sb}d)%~f6o4|eJ|3>jU z-6i%-{~C6L=M!Y7r7Ol0j2E+~{M=HD`3l*|&xPxt*9Lz75#F|uu~OrFf69L0`=K1* zADMZ#LIK};r@RrLpWn>HeOqquPez@NRX*QN{h95R`xyDr2)S(R*^h>Ig?%!g{AfZs zwTJxZi4gu_p7Ob9B~EhG9#?_ z2qW-V$lLJy)RK;lf+}vksGRu9@5(vAukf1dXrb(Y^R(ROiTS%%I^YN!0$g{Pxqp(K)&+3a(3`HPN~?a zm@|;C{H~k}{2hH}|N4p}kk8-a(sdN^^MXHeSc{*F+XMMZ|Lfv~y=~sv(XfOqkk8Ni zvj5HCkB{u~Z%Jz)U+I4v`1|i^AL%WDe5L=L;CH#UzHcdWAYbW!5BSRutsWd>4CE{Q zuj(P}?R(9$t+XMKuk^nW{Q5=yeOg8r$XEK`3jR+m`fsHNd*mKKAPvrGR}MknD`;2z+%y))k^BH?!6{2t-sTO(@~m2f9;eh=`>kpl`AlW;e1evfa_ zt2w^!VdjlTUf}#5-aShf-z+ZSs$Q`FsIafso?E?3NVowwzh^kCUAYA%CEN_0-xFNt zt9c{z5^e>~@A*BSJvpS5gxi7h{ZXSYTy78};ZERueS7=W7w?poa5v+azxQf%>PQ(0 z_cD&-@jER%=gLaBs<*J8=OqWrEp?R3!$T|wguP`W zXQ@VoKV;m^^>-5Od~R-9>9bq6{$c%I;B~0LxAlLljr?HSzz6iVum6Oo-1+VE{7|4) zgKJNd7&r70{$cwvKQew$E#%Sy#?8RlzO_&GH~F>s&f&n-R^V*k7ytGt^8A<8vsvB_ zoUdcN`P4bPLWdvxGbU=Elk10lquYUndK(0_XMmqASz)ZTqlD?tSZa;C_WZrIo(^^IOfn zSpO*o*=IkLKR?%{wamKVJmf!RA>7USVc&(1=AYYj^63n2pBFgW_uAE7En4qh))Kf{ zWfk_beG^i0%Fi);+L7fAz}de2mVQI#ZmLs>aWinXPuum|*vuUp{HH#YpH|=vNWixZ zek*2Jc6!JN`kUIXJDlIXwH2CL_SH;n#JH37!@ib@t2%$5vU)q?Zs2U6?fbR$_Sf$8 zCvdeFINSHh#T|V@_g`Gk@~ZyAeztGnvdgO?LS*I3qX2JU~c zzOT^pTeBj)5)S)j7Q#Na!oGRKrc7%+@yvb3?W`a6eIJw5yHMFeg6A}8N15sbNiPUINLXH(>tl}Z>g(c{i*@z|LA|A*UJ_wHg{2F;A#W# zhE(9&4xejw&RJ+@I{odB-;w-GqS%<)jN5^;eSc0E zyw_xz^c=X_37qX~KX1X$g`VqjPdQYk*U|eBNgnRA`0D7Fe%wknq={dX4Lh+&s`h1)5`@t6~YhJzl9f&l@C7vsBKUBiqDCha*sSveABjH@H7rbL* zrW_9gPW4vvM^vSnoLqO1%92;FB~JL+Fj&}o=+vruY6&-?oae0rDpoEYD&bsjJb3Q2 z&%V}3IDbFGf&TNfc)zzp&3W~wK#u3VMPmvU(nvV#PY18p+MgGNNjUp0>5Q=Be8${dw zg-N&xcoO!@Ke>D;T+*M3_N4%?SboyS5t4mLz|(;j-W8InwdB>W0-g!HeC4xWM_Tjn zWaL8*@SFFCZz*8Q!*#&*Lxuexhs~KEWzWM?(0@$8`*iv}G1`%b$D^Fj8)lq~o?B4D zx&L!NT=U7%q1+E?d`W>k*Z;<^A4SRarvvBn4*U8-UqwspWBuIUBG+fH=Ke1h*LD%#D)#!}_^j9jMXO!2OE!$3vd|-(Y-ZCE5Q;!1=tVNV{gw z3P|x`{qcxn#+cSO-W#qlH;EVoX?w9Z=cyV(vlY+)}IdjUC!?MQSLwb zVZ#0t=$|z8UI{t>Ou+d%()4#r4Cha{oz!d=l_RvyU~C^FM|4A>#jCuOgf%AErq0jo>S_zK_o{9bVW%IT~O6|*me{z89PF9~&K=MxtaQ$%Mhc(|i zJ4H$HF#$ILFIr{$q-a}S`!bPV@xXW4r}r;t&%={|CjpO7`{18K4uR7;t^xha?GfWk z3V7-@n?@Ce9t_?7bz(D)^D6Mu!T&ts=gm5_OXgcKFS3K51^%pmo-HZ@J7vBd^GGxJ z`uBuiW}GXZToitj`A*Ecxjk{`elH`<>4p|7gtX9o!!3zXqH)Yext>f4ko1YI$8=e2iEp<#k*W zc&n!VFyEjGtY5i~7!Q8C&qB{u$X4Z(p!h4-5tG5Mur6g&MQ`bvKNI}ZKXy1(%@)X4`d>Rr*t<4i+?&;{fqbR^P2fKc zpLD*4C6KT5e**X$4>dbc(;UcG`acEyu6t(fu4N45EB&7V{$ILUU+MoG@MDi% z+*d~z$XEJ5Hc|Lz@5ZQlzUJi1XS%MVT*viMRJ6Y9#`>671w!Pgl1c#^zBJ2b>+H*M4(mGv5I!rnpG(x<2e zE%$%_b#g_$LXYpX6LN9bhe9d|zqy@MOxM*MD5u|Kj~#mX`lPqCxXwg4)yuf7hpy*& zpvO{9@VVaX|52}Yw6Krs%~aT9!ut>f?z<0Tw$Ph1OZdCz+pk)=4K$u6Kp$Tpzti!+ z`)UJ8lU=^&MAr!UWblqI{&6hdmqT$kScG0jCvm?=8hHP#n^-XnaT416@ydO!h_CBs zfZzMv%!c7i#GdNs`A`mck@sK!D?-AP=7{$3{Y^haUHeS7FZo^3uDCJ6Z`)>nlgvIQ z{h5$w|4b-RVyi5l0J&uBZAaRE=U=4owSnYgQJ#kVlj~_VzRvH%bKfs^h&}ly1NNnZ_tS27LB6kn@Yt@%8}K$+r~JWs2)A_0AHVj0RqMk2+Alv&_$L|i zRXi!RLd*oftGm_VL&tLzHF1q1z{mBaXWvO8oWO-iqNCWT4@V=$x{LDbP zZLsJkGn=|MNcj=w=pyRR0`EqF3U1jy+VR4^xY0u1KKl75{zX`ykE#6$kc(yBCkBgu zkrQ|p{2m9qP>C76q7fe&mz3iNK{TGlp}!?SE*X2m{o}v%o7$mr2s`+^Z1_KyPKH>C zE!yb;pUsQerGFPrt_ylRwVOpN>-I_uX>5cdDwr1n(#IdscT(Qfu%jYc1r zRh#qlTOh~BQT4@obwVZF2;7FfsoJ)K@^k7Qw9f&2^T)sUim>MCw*hwn&#HWNhZZ;; zCv13rj_;T8fOq-Z!z&`;2cb5U?OAt>{L zPd_O?T>J9p?_kT^X>$G=CklJn|C8U_T#fzjlh-7?q0m3C{9#n(*KdP7_urY94t*#0 zUk7l`-x5DxZmhNn4gU54=lr`_bn22&3HLCL>%p%N(-`Fbkrzs)=6AItq$H%ZvX z`J1!gwPUjV7RVdHYmqu)QKVGAWuG{%asQmScg{|^ejDT*$g`>KDvgx$+X38yJkQ!( z`76o4x$hfc|3&rQ_MPk>?*EKOo~_kN_D?qS^Z4>jW=sPwn?0{$B7(Hkj!NmcKgW=a>ssPs-!J@k3$14Y;mvz1{i7Z$7@Ff1OVs zW0v#N26^sZ|K{wC2(^k9`u)q}KX_#e#@)!5e<*ihKlIM+q|2FVS zs|NKB4-#MH@xTH8?HZ|1*={+$I&L5K_n$XP<2)ey`F%!wd@SGXbiEKLAY3;!e|}e3 zzr(IJ3j*QXKe+#Sqi1ywLAwdJK%V>G%-5#RRZF-HIQzdu#Sd16N;vmV2Y6Et&yCSY zILmYXJax`HD9gJb=fS?!YR!Z&$Wwn&9*?uZt2K7u7d#FLYsK-<2wZ0ue)-8(@)7%; z>@~C($2$++cdBhxz<>TlItaHyPKUg1v2I)2eB&)}JN7G9|8`4`mlNe|?s$k=1Hu$6aR9INd7|2)Vk72s-+j8f?FJCbP@|EqefPZq*5BGz8|4^rx zU)sUHQT2YR|7C_!6?9&uoX-(V^E@5qDK5x+u_v6)t8%2@lqae-B9Hm~Jl{4|RguSq z*crl3&lbUJ_my_Oe104UJg0@gH?O%nDO5+biGIM>lM}#O8`-WApZ8P!uJuBW^Ze(F z_CI8Ketsei@+Hz1YQiP`$tcgjex)tC7e6=Qi*vyD7qh@CepM6C=gFeA!ha^kJXt$a z*w6Ox`?$EiDbeLhO7#VNPcRyRMscz300XOmxO(q)DDWHTly`>k)Lb1 zKcM9gQXDnza>CDCc0@aRcb?t8<0JIxW(j)}b6RG~aW z`5cTF{EMsV4G!{rRKWKOb+d(ECbyirEQ%FlPyH@lkvC@Wi9-J2ykYzAyr#BA7=!{E zj{@w6{1M&PZ}InS1Y4}DCF8jvUMF*b-}lObPk4Pt<_Fjh{`3Q(4|%;u=Ew1KNmzf? z%@OvGdNl5i(tgTgrTwIf{9;2rX2{#HC!F#)S^7=eq;eJ`ppr&qvKgq9$z^>vVmXc$4#9JB2QR~ z^efxz1i!DNZi7PpyT+L<^2dtydca#4R_tbB@JOGsf2$SlYpJm^Bh#*?$b+ zH!fZ0`yzT~iaqg_{o4Y5k8c*F7S-nG(>TWcTOODE*YD5|?U3j3&xPMIpT@Balv52f zZWvz6f86KsN#MTwp(cv)F$M4Sdb>>4bNRR*yHNNgWuVaW&$R8UxDC{9rGC;&?bbpr z4twV=A)kQX%68jPj&|jKhntTzb^h&DU$yty9HBon!VNypTlqNnL6|f5{gT9`jr?F% z_`#dMJ`H~dl%E?Owji9Vrtv-Z{c|r@pKrZrk?@-Z`-jUnWXXQDqnzixSHCZEjOV>n zpB>|x6MO!yz{%!uugSg>_Nl|1(C5bfi_~$Wd7hn5AI4+;4ne&=EnfuFmkm9-#lnsl z_0_(7y)~FW%;0_f%{!ID{a(-ekMcz6e?lowbg0J)dH!C31Ha|AQGTbPoaFuat<9g` zygpAjy$3Z5eC2bete5x1=gn77xYi-;rZTE0D=dFKPWX{cF;3V0C&_%_zhdr>O> zr+RGp>haAJaUIEy?|h$*?VA>17kvM5^()a1Q&G`xQ{S&xHcZ0#{#Rb7dE?yMm*jPl z9Ms3>?SE`CndEgAUI*4M5%$mg^}zvNNAVw*<3#;@T&~jVL`k(ZuYK{5<9UJRm!20x zC7ksqfw#KnZyI@B#93P$w|SkYOS{?ILM?gv(;>(GruxEJcQg{70z4D@rg3|#$m@tE zmdF0e-(L^q^*6FF6aLXJ754A?ZD@1Z|LMR@z}02WHsRy3uU`b5$HarTXwQwtL5{-# z=P^m(e-QO!s`5BY`jzweH1I>(zP>REeh}Ug^GxMDJ`?;hH%9D;HZxP~gSB6~O!&e2 zb%h@a8Uy*sit`W?_|Gn0NGN0o$dUxs#uEJqilZ)_#eJ&pxcx3ZPZV# zig7*zd?HeO`8pT(ulc9jZ<6DyUoPzB_?D=iFo5Ihlh0gKal-n0?z%f)Xzs2Nd5^kL4Q1W72YrTaipZ5 zuaoikRdz{}19JOPAg4#3F1&m-L#{s^ILGhX&kAgk>(`wW<0AY2fw^Zd*?)!_VtjGc z75mgH_XdSIRsN0qYX;8tmq?wnBE*n~n^p?{u>Z?wj=9y+_!AGD{lEK@`Wxl(D~WOV zf0Sxmggk!ffu~?U=fhsD!=0jj>JNOKDB+o~GabAt4QBin>^wr*e=@;0ZHtd$zX|Q4 zf8@Zw+Ev2N!ACQv2aBH`P$1k1rL;gX{EUU&YETH&#p+6J6e`j?#F6Va=%VVG3V4PFVFWYh9SMHy`$9s3k z$4?9LhTC^)!sttCXI}mBDd<0#A2h6Y__t6APhuSHKfj`QNsWZ(#vi<;m)^P`EdFsE zfACJf|4E5p@mG$wnc#=-==)Q!_?v)hR|`98ocnEeu=pn-zCRWzpRBP;_Cqccc-772 z3&_V`JI5c_2|rn?yDi5z1@b(;B(6X6p~jx4pW~Yj-j~zDs^yC>*N^>x!`%+Z@l9SU z;>+Xf`jd+bsjYeXZHoBTJAPaz$Ir9|@kRXVguS~jSp4F_d$M+LvtaRyMf{S$`+msy zYQf@{tT?`=fWPzhf!uLdv|jXIJ@5?dH}_g$l;g+O0W+YtysPYRH55?)(SIcDQ4u6;*IwXg-JNebN;0NtD7&&XF@Iq`)Z4hW$=29Z+s0{ht;nY{uo=P@*K`1 z+21DUF@bk-@stGaSL9FkQju?Nw0m9ef8UXhcL|V7#{TAn!lmVSrJRP8qg`y=q2mM65PS|<83;d&z+xiuf@Hmw7 z`NY=)a(*Z*;d+cG3E=(wxqhQg!c7>5lUe`HZ)X>g@HEzs@w7w18AppscqWcl8Q|@I zvf#^N5}pJ+3%IuE*;cOr4;F9j$HEWy;S+51ac0{L-@b@ycOn{JufOm7b4r!gPSui3oYYdx>k^hXd|P86wip+)!RPN;j8DsQgckO#Z?A+KyZjb5{;SU4$V@lpEAlqw3Is2<$@nRoDNdB;(UMqOR zKA#n@1s=>EJ9wwxTCg%QFy8{~cY;5<)R#?^*YBubDf5kdLwV>x96gX%eJboEocfhs z`b}|j;r(RWp`rf;*$m=+TJb%xZ@pJ8*QX78F&`<_w66m2oE zDh1ag*=`r)8dRPhbiA^Fuf@F83x3%GGm8cLevTV)Pt&l(U)$1Q~eG#K$dd8v6IT z{yYh5=@hZlRIPgiQul{hm!hamUU!VRQ!TnRJKV0d*6zDsCrr5Wk zW@d^#=~wzM1N^SBn^*Dp!BWIm`Y#9ks-MnU6lB~DSNbn@tMG@({b*W{d1CH+S=oQ_ z;CJ%eQ`5LBZ~l3&;ytLz;1e&H|9G9T{=qUEUdDf!(05P&llx`-r~ORWH-Exg?w9eO z3Hie+l5P9J8v=%lIz^{N9tkEfvgvaYaOahrqEJ;QvqmVSE`KuS>Rvk+t~dw z{?mUU{PE?WvulF+PkEg<4*dV+KRzzK6P5YN%lIz^`uYz#-s)ximjV9picR$|h*o`iO1D)=VE zH(ODjgKsXR^`{pOP z_qlWs6jjykZ3n(v@Q<1FlkoIPVjeK9v$*Ya=;U*2)^_Nf3OpnO`uO?o=r@+dI9nE- z#&{NRe!koEL&L+<2B`Txb!zPnVL!M3XsHDq_Ex=YAbH>MCL$I%-(QneS+r+lqnze! zJ8@|vej4iI^O88o+akwy3_Kt6)v7rEO9G$tk^S2BVqU}kDL?E5M{!7Dn~2e3J1j;QXGw79W1xy{PxXuw4CL3i}^S>E4;jj#M$+AEJ*Q$nvqk*}s{U z9nI!?SDj)!4mkUF^0CWzlQwT|0bHE`obPiS`u3#VZ5}yaA)Joq$-voP>|gzf1+hy1 z(tI}Is>r`I$eoD4vYq`(cqYnuouy*m4O>DDRGaXpVWE)kB#Km-J2gFjdTnxB`su6h zDNjjw&udw6&1|;8qXzkyXZ(#2cvuE-_M18U{?F_;@<)~e?{>ICZXOb@-6`77^2r}{ z@5_CG{NWFjuP)y6dk}_=8aoa?=`=*LiP|RnCl2~w8@)Q|o^2NQYmFV{{Qhdwfvxqcm=YIG~r*_}*U_>A~-7KgFD>Nw}Nj1gz zHMGlbj)Dem}X;!`ZfI@ zXa618boKp@<4KydY0C&hC`-aFAP{yH#IVZ_yMRgyP!Z2gsO}nB4ufm zRb&`tl^tYQc2Gu{1`sGqzd5;&)80Irx4+lt_xz)`xsP+sJ?GqW$MZh#^FB#WF5d$= zGuFQL`7O_~ORT4UyU?HG(6+bLE?LiL;10}_Gb(TEz%qUEeH-`!$HTVp4w$AUir zY52;P-^y{5ihQ02#k5;3=%#J#+NPj{$0DEm+b*r@Cco*KHEJRn$x6YtxGd#^tvye%>Io7y5f3SM`&y zFK5r7`f^+vIUjNV-jJhP0^$<RqHhWsnU~!oO{P5EU@5*uMKt9Li ztDpBb2^N%$ot|e?=7>Jd3?Cm9U2%%XGU%2F!b|B?-G8CMe3+> zpp+a(3CQPjV}87PWCP!aQTZ0^r%eUjx=9Bu*15PHlRTxkZMH{$bqzH?79 zLH|kLbyGNA$X2?DUiscdHt4sMtYrCL&KZf?E$qF}ZE=TS=ZqK?^Z8iNQ~6{MzX!+m zWV%C|N%rJ>k0cHJzn9$*9mJk|@4aMzzTlG+&-i&`+H@uBFl*iaVt}!j2GC zGWeqQp#G5(?u#>xRr>9>8~e61@Sa77(6B{3w;TqU*Y6j-$nNGIbv-8{CR_x%KEv%$NcGyTJMzk z`5ZAX=st@WU5W1*NWS40VK<*6HfQdcqmiO`fBAflmDwHtg~K*BA^=X1mk{n{b9 zpoBY7t_^f&=H5NT?TyNJvi-n^y1bUc;HP$|j6Z@XE-m15g3pbVaB7Fy(r@bjl+VF< zUE}|HZ%FxkI_g*9CsDpen^Rfz%lzKZw-Z;qM;Ki+F8;rj=exg${8XfeYPAfwzqjIj zeV#8LX<2N#JTKw*<+H#)*SL2xugj4>xz9Z@ugL*ji8=imb36&{McicokJ>BjPT01% zI>&8*JUqYT_u^NsJ#aplyjYfl^xKBd-j(At4f$-}-sh%;l39$eJ>}gm8ukl6{L~}t@10|Z^LLBXG05ldBGqqRx#z_DSI?6W;*SH)>v4?_ zFUwe7*8C~s$-sF%?&Id=w>9oOWiD_{8t~Ddu71O(x2oKdHES%rYqVhg4B)&Tx8nF8 zRr?%YwT|&DF29Rtm!GxYcCXsT(XX@o9N=vKhilSTk6KvuC*V43IZ;o}@q%CX=Jwed z6QQC#*cOQVm;=H;!{7V0pS*8@`E&3+;T6{|^wSvq?BpL^9QcxvX8ac2P@WI!2Z{2z zU;2A!%>(2Ix`;mmd>j|eyZpXao^NIWXZ`<*7lbD|*L(bTPYd+LUcpCB@kh81U zjO98BXaBJMQE#eu%Kpg$zZ2&cl=!uRQT9&`@EG=k`kUplf1)yl{Vw#6Szi>~&HnL~ z^Niz$QNt-0`S;q!U-i~lgbb=@2l&{}wVSBo zLV)}GUEu5o7k>BO(BT&QlQklFF~B`YXSLmUPV%ePT};#)>)mPmvQ(MhbSTg-U8lES zrIza50NjFf_WVcTq2@e$GT?U`@B;CPb;Bgwh5ZFCj3aNq9KTF0;T(@n@V6;`yoFwSQPgg-Ey;`CRYseZS!j`-%L+acMX#?2KwN%p>_nXF`55>=m!Y78p>Mfy3x&+@-M*D<$U1&aqa=r4CXnEPF9 zAx-oncHmy5BObJE9bhl~#rp0%)mJaqhw+H;lNo8v8@;}l{b7MzEAaHiJNn7>oq~L} z_g;(p8og9sc9ib`-4{c*Ru2arqtfc5(0{2pB&F*JNYT!xDEQ9 z?R2Gi{e@`hB6{Vx9d%UL{r8WVt@t~}f?Cik$L(0qM~;Ye@_d--X?~&{w+W;1+>7x$ z8T{!;38#6jOZrXpSs4F$zg|{D(a#Eb8eME7@tgfUfAO^h4R%^md>M|RedBq4hXplW z3jt1k;O`g5Laqt)OWzswN6~01CGR47p7&be)2!h>s^mU`6d2Iv$5`k^E#0ed^bn#n9OrI!rjPE z?jZQPC!dtoTYdZK74t){R6g0I#D!kI^TbXFyR4{36Mhp;aTqK8_UV!PJe!~I6i=>o z zcpBziS)iL)ZPHzykNe^*EDibmyfp{EzxcY!@L==sWCeYcTlk|?!Fp#xg<83PDSkYP z^9W)=PeeZZwCPd8KE7Y<(|2+r3!rw8=@9YrKk65njpyS`pYfmi`M$3NJR9lwNveHe zP{8m1lY#v}{kMK8t~Uw-!efB5|0539`Y>F=+5agx$KceHS=-qE#2=0NNrs&8haY^c zllhS!{hsjCw?ls%8k&b|or-x%&d;yy7TSq+l%>%B(%DTj)p`879EJXqV}2bL5MRKf zeiMEed3J2gusnWk<}RU^cc7@Je!a)fk;{(*A3yII)nREjH3-Q5WZ*o%EaUxZwS0fU z@t^fT$Uo{huu@|d0*F5Y{07XE?tM3YU5JFU|Fb}MqEd%Uo@Y>e#jX-^S-%|6Rmv*+ zC(rXmX~Lgrz@ttHe`t0zIU>*Z4S0{ji}P1+{qEf$&!-)@FHQjene4Xfc|Ps4N1LtK zuQ#c1NC&z6bnvmiN_P2VyFBkq1)hoYy)>hi?I3@}B0n4HpPjy+8YazK^``^lz4Ycz z&G@`I;*SQ-@xIpDy?Z$L$)9Px#JI}w8VmaMb6(zvFtQ~gC3!LMX9DOhdkeqM^A5t3 zLq+}MKyHC)Ti%xal~GZ|AIDVkj*6YR6yncfdvN~}cejgL_E!$$80U8%>UlmO{>})0 zu)XibM~2JwnF0P7&^4Utn9BZ^{gDCv<3Ly4@%IyM$Fja@ke3X)J*|e!=XL&I@tO|0 z@ptMx3%0(m`bYSO<2w`dpX|?`&+CnH`ElGIfG){4q)TC=ppfgs-dNQ0h(c@TOZ}NP zr9xnRgl#^;pTeO2UYBq-Fuvw%i;PoC@>7AczmN1;ohbK5vB1-jYK!*FeUFL!6a6*X zGq1mauE5H_`tZ7+utv7>rTBsK2e_Akq_6#77dKQ)T_76!h53s&IUjG_t>tF zKUYio>CXkW_oMxLd?5Qb6a3MjD|)9ysx%(z;?SS*I>b+DG4FHVMEWOykNfXm_f5GP z(BELb7t=<>PqVvyPif35|K+!z^+SD>crg0QVB=jT=!y(F`$`_~66T{n0Dm^<)_p!y z&Ha`rP53Jnxc}T&k9Tq4e_l7_vfO{iRtc=H2^lBv z%jKtmkNtJ;gV4cp|D6mx18Kz}y_T^Znq86oWeN}U*Rw0z zR?Gg%gk1Jl;xEVQ%Kpk`9OK=H(f#ho@u$BSXzx_h#5B1+)4?ANx>j4?oXq~F{)PSF zM*EBf-Ger3HgY?a^-YDm1kfcuJ^F(@-YMfX4Rq1Bvla&%@66cG$?Y!#^bM|Ajt3j> z640KrLD&1=8lIv?p&{9$yg!P%B>eNYYV^rs2DT)RUU`2M1Nv?+!fNxLN#>&aOy&I% zVRZkTjQf!U@bh_rY52{33enSjyA%0>KO{_FTJ#_KQX-AT?+LR`PUrrXXzB9V85SEQ z=y+W4Lf*EuLlSlQ?F`E-8AxxuEd27;y4nvzh1lG`bRQU1KQL}BpeG_Zc+-W*mP{2CAN5X$gf z&%9Tf{rz3>G4wz66Q;gmK4ZNv?8gLr^An(OKSD< zxM2pL73rXP1#;g%pz<@YZpZ%rbnJi*yp~S5gZZJ~jxW1^E0^yA&gDND@nw?KZ|FS0 zSu6_al8ltPW?m*KYxJ!X3)2KVtU4Y5YmLbD&SV6 zk%NjOILDFc58;;^8{QnEk#P2>1$ddK_ixDYVnaUHm$6teGy93^ zo8!q2y64|~SVi)W&WU_8?9h+s^{#9m#{-vtZF!MUxqL79*}fG6h8yJaS%02qkG@m6 zp$7dR>1X;=*v<0WCwvjb@`J^L1@r^wMLguVQ{f_c2H-ZN_5Mxi8DKBhH|A}HZXPcn z*M|dqE~E{+jw~+w!wq{qz~kd5kCE$JbuBQyTdjDrt^EAK0DdFr%50i{SAPDWLcfrL z)QEa9gMMbAI&*?Oe^8E7R?tU|DG|=|BK8ycRXI+jf&QTSTtcwt56W>W6Z9`X%vu%f z`GaztqOxiHO5yPb{L$BizX+#wU$gX^##8=IDt~_<6X(&i?)`Z=?zf1SE|PCmjE^=+ z9(|wHp%v{hOt7dpE=vraS5S?(B>yPObwN(c&liyA6rU5TlW;yC#|yeAsUrr4%J^oXf6PWP?kzTS-6!)~ zMu>R=>%Tl=O=TVr{QBJ#e&YLzrb~Z2t(C?TKKIoIx)(Jf!*mkP`_tI|)<4g%Ys@PD zMe?2C<2d-{Qi+8j5^e|XM*6`U@zX*j`6lFhkSMSi{9F?0+A>Ha$l8Q4OQIjQD3W+eh-<;OF-DVaG9w4!Ty;J8TY@%FjJF7436lX0r>jd^h+wzW-Q#d8{1YUdGY>J0CtYK=NxXhdAOZ%#Mk%DhTG-- z%>vws^vId`6S@?^PyG|03+slRZqPmW_~RL2HbKXKY1~w{Z!hR$4_sXJ0Spz&J2^|%LabFe>rk5HZZ>6e>>=QoSrl&Sp9PRJ3&`=XuHCpLF!l8-@8G-WOqdq z+Z|B9z*T<k`r;=M0dM2{ml_t9a3{v26yU$jeJ9xfJXn1=KsWO4GE=bc z|0(0$1^PQV_D4m{s(>qK{|EY;Gb^_V_WeI)d>9`JzYRbB&ZotV0pe98U#X7;^r{!e zk-@(Ir|geYK>u^wslSy76z|`Mq?~UN3EfxOFpqG8-^1nlaJp~Hk$w|>rY3M+rN{Xe zB#-Ww+~ops&Nmej`LU0LA2{C-BJ!5&AApb1LG#LV*h^@zSQ!>LH(h=ZlXp7rrm10$mEyztZ>A*J9tDC{5fS z@b`-N{@MZhi7w)eNjxN<_unzS8}#OqDa}HC`|sHQOt1W2k?OIqztF{FzQy%G zdWstd=KH+g&;)vtNB&do7XIb(=MF1hL+z8pcnavb|M;zbxm1dPSDqwP%Au`zBb@) zq;>X(443rPsh%Rf5x*B2be_fM5t6;8Uq$_K{8w6Zp}#P1@yWhQMunAVJ@m4*8$-lZXZ>z-Cr)xM>&o>kkk3Z`VZyx7$f-Ee}9!5 z?~?tedM5m0M7sZ6?<4Yjp5No;_B*!3#^2@VM`rL@k=BlUD^;HF8?m31*9n(xIDSH& zZ#%%p{rkzt5_P2hTbIH((qRp58N)2O{twmvEd1ky{T|Te>{#0@Tu*b~;VXiT8KM6c|BZJ__=-&W^~MF;l3M6c}s9H94%iW^rv zDnGq)JadD-d85!NujvEnX`aL5nOahn)`hL;_f;>2e|TNkgx@kftqaE@pTy8OshmGK z(BBeH-wjIzJE%)Q&#K_hJr^7N*Q;Etn8&ZtnlYc?ypYK=Dp1*U`TKv!!#r&W_p^dp$aAoM{|fv6Zr5%A$2$2@X%F#I`$z$w34F|B z!Ee@|=*f=>$QS(i&#&NfIDQN-)J*1Odgb{Q>5!MUs_c78yD09J-wn+I{owugZ?mo> zn=Yz1RfE8I(yNk>%o{Cm@~bUf;M|V*T#vsZ-VDKgD)@=NieM|MCQs>!8@ueCo>@+VB{Yno=0lUS1H2{6OoKV@RSi5c`MNFV<_An5)b z9uFLte>y?m>Cn(cLHruV?-%hoydKcMG3FCjsA4>zI4~j(`2NPA3G`3qxIq7uJz0Bd z!2KWSd46yzj=A1?0=nSo?HK*zn?y9-G7~Do?HK*pSJbYzroHk=lYl1 z3AHOT>^5kH-?&|w@mr>+b`^(w@;v!HcDm?a`TdPveVozAz8CD9+7_{w_zMFVFM2yx&Xh=_r+#?>vcE zo$yP8DUa#3y?~4QD`j~^Kzc-jF9B&9Qo?%O)VE^dmg|+T+J0V`W zWO@VMukb*g>-Sb4=!|}{+&@IGeDBi`D(t#;=Haza_?sDsUisdq8T7?$vEPL;AyTr} zs_?rF^h82&lKZ_B^l$N_3jU!n6Dn|iUz+d#S}zGJsUtypl|FC_|L!v#M*>i2LM#4SdW4y|dp6`W7INPVv3qSmHRezP& z2S~mO{OrH?cGtcw`zJO=lxqh6lB{Eg*+0Z@MLzpw*O&ua*)N21yJGo&|De;$^^*dA z2h#mtc77_~Kf936{d47Z=a+|}{(SY5`<}BAbRMKdYCDSQ;Rh8i(#HjRRpG)PRTfll z87}$DgnS;)!h0WnCqlw4z*(P|AIfixlyDpKV?0}K8o9p!a9Lk&&vwvX=+|O&knhgs z+Q;qL3Hleu5|auURRI^tSH_IM?TukPAKK`bsSz{2T?nrWClahW$-(m;jvpnU3GfpN!EZ~iD!1wT9`Z%wH~Uj90pw>r_@WC6d*YB1 z8O6Cx`c3u7`yhFrKKGN0KUB>KHhwdGav4z{4#?Y7VEln#7?NE&0CeV|;)J~juAC~9g9d}sjYRrTRoc9~^_&wfmwL-A*+X1;{ zT7T459v@uD&&K}yft@o=^7zE#n+J6FyLbPL$0ynUs=~rf_J7~)y+U}L655LKTj@_D z_;lV6w+0)(Q&6r2bYpf-I~i>JHesJ_i$X2$YRsZU@}C2Ij8ARZrbvi{vwbemtu3W5 zFOT2s9|!c9*>QF;**`pfs|>>a`&+ACV*gP2M&z?!_Pv^^X1@^5<2TE%+I~(0xqi&x zw<7&u%F~cR=v<&{*4Gs$kKbP8^Z31_ z{F06ll0OYagdbR+Q-&d5%Hy{QIFBneJOc;G<2UQe?b!nQ&;NYO6KwoudT!4)F2CZm zAPv=LL@v3`KhoYdfk}0THw_0^FBd)7sLVRTkQXFx=ztBh&~4EaweQp9QB&8 zKhxHHHQOz;L;ONsEaFREB{AM6O zb&RN|VjF(?RIZ<7;8{q+Lr*W@X$;AaN)ht8{N%rH1-w_42K}Q-2s`UWWp1dzxZAU7~<;Q`K`_UtxhYw-DQu(?2WI@+%WwUgij}WehT;^|<`l!FWK9mN&45Zti zo_#kA_2#Ru(CDc`zl`RX?}F~ws&7Kr4|08Z;Ex>8J%9bCBOC;zPYm*-OA3FOS{Gj& zA>pyeXMM*NynZMW`VfB(>LCGi*9Udz%kQlao{D^KZ*d0;?&1CDgr@`N{^&x>8np{a z^0S5tJ2^hX8f@(>$5S@zhxWcP^SfSBd)Fi<2>$qiH@sxl?pkfn#i+|Hp#Od4tD~cY z-TWTrl;p+6? z^l9t|H+r|ZO|(>gx}yA+t5$tkqe$XF#xoV=4_a1e+R%cnssh(!1D{SAzH5nL(9>`J zZcvy0C;vtv-nss|Uo;n$swpoah~7E`tiJ_bHV0gLrr<|)4`vK^tFCZ>dNz;Y?hDyw74Pt zFP`^M|HjW9^reLzmNueaDL?dO7SDe~X<{9b=@TF~8ho$**tfX=^pfa9^-PB}4)hz= zRxlPcGNnkV{idS6IG$5Muc;IAJ;yzBk$?1{&j4MQGunT6K16sn^11#te(-p^L25tx zGKg=i8#g~_-c=+I*SJOm#%JL-d#U)_#8|CZE3O}5@mvk-M=x6tr&+~jP|H$91U&-+w4Zc{UYm#?VhycGF zUkSiDzS8G>dnOWeqBNmzcB1fOD(Lr@8`y{6=OKG-qXf?J@xc{SM>PaceHbuKJ8*8o z#Phc|zus*979#QC+8oGbo<6BFV&(F)fJc=R{utEaQSNh9DnADK{Jj5zDvsvz_!tM= ziSHcuZGLxOcN zKsRph*`EA83bKdmm)pmmXS(X-`qjTK{1A<_qW9fXd=3Kfr;ir(!TsBqBI|R{(IGqm zd~9$3r5nQK?}WqxPerO3sd-r(?T^m6jA* zF`vi;{i6@tJXY=}COtFIK2+slZ~xM7@Igkj?xR=S*HAfhzmtslx(R$1q=eJ`QG)cF z=uH~oFVZUs*A`10we%a-JkeintD z?oq=3#6$0;IzxnhJce<-Zr%LOW;N=K{2wz=(DC_^aYo_SKWhx$#rJEh2id1AmoWcx zeDI|p<+kR;Z?>1{efFp`kx##U*fXB1amsT$+nD&oVM*~x)rb(6FAj3gE!I~M`aW5C ztTXGr|ehXcdSN@87rj8 zdZk0o%QerMW_`7&7RjObbq*KvUVi_iO_MVBL;RzRz`fw(^|&678mhDs&hNJ}f4gpH z{*n1j6@@>Tf9Ql|J7j)-zm55C4ViUDBgwZZ_-CK5HIwDjIAPBb`rAR5d|bp&vA4Ii z)H=w@yo=~nptpeDiF9oF{h#RUd9?H&(c7L1`3BH=kj_hr=pUMrpPu(m8Y&69WA_Vv z%08T+4GTig`~Ud;PBZwva6I$q;Rh~-^l_s;_^EzMbvkUtgi%d`bmJR(D?^khwo{XgSk$P6t zAJ=1tcRC+erwJGMaINWef%E?L7kz&_CGTH1RSArP(StT`koa{L;3mAsR(#gurP@6C zI(|Ql*Sn`hELthAciX|w?aS4;;qMw>z0&1x-;86PY7U$9GDN~{z}-lDO!#1mPAcEa z{J0Mo7E$w3sDvA;3j4S}PphUW8Ybi5H-WC|_uJ0vf&1bocfT>W7Ypbf9Bn-)JXP4i ze~Dh%UTmOWe{s^&h-9V|DbXw2iv#o>TYUa7G9fS?h+f%V+@PN}W!Gl~;_}lg+l#82 z@W=F$Kg}-~o1b3UUQD1r)mc}$P)vS$WqYxL{-JKXqi}S7dS!dDgMQ12jNOK){PfE9 z;sSkxGv6*Lq7S5}@s`_*+>U6x^`hN)!O!EZFunV63+Ku{9HO|<(4?Lk+=mv%eR5w5BJJKEDBd^nYO>|K_+pY<}@_mmJbd!rNNTv6gaIVAIt z-<0JOMt;kN9x>qO{nZKhE!$3hOF=&I`}_Nq!Y*TZ5tmJ`Hvg7=Pq+p5xi0Ya8$MPq z-)DM|&*!0+T=DhAy!*Nkl~Xa#SG^(Zr1HtGe7IjP-@Z`LS@HggS>p5Ap^1}zQ~kIV z?asbX*hA%z9jed7@67K+`qQx+8r~mCcsk^9`)b=T@ul9^ztTnZrN{h61-Y4^*V$Uf zg`@olYC+HYW_h1=Ht0<~x+F*ZS36oD^oyz`{Pg&6`5z;Lv?I1xu3w6WRFo47ey+=8 z{Fdn{9_+{`-N}z$g&z&e0{xhR-#mUdEc$qWywAc5dF;n6?{rwt`(k82rhFyj8fptW z--=Eh81Wx|~uB@xJ$7K2f8eCixlQ=jSDz%-!Ac{@^s=Sx8r%>lh`k=jSN+M?ASbm!BW`?XN5R z68DaX(^vf}9Od;YY9~>4;TN_q2J~~w^-tur1+Ev87l-oVKsVsZSr3mRgr_1u4bKIq zwQt%-etwh=+~5^{?b@a9F8TRUCUBPj^x3|0^7A8Wb72STS@q?fM?CIP`TBaoUKi*} zU9R+w{JlA)z0shLJh!||BpZs9JOqIFAe-zGlV=he#>&GKgdQt@%!}En7$D7ynn4x|2=EYZP%;^ zu8UbBa9-Ca6Q6TgVFc5WVvKoJ`O+v8)WEbGl@I5WVvKoE*?Q zhn3YunDf&s-_MC|AncE>_QOm%r%NecsZSi}V-hpJp>=&Fy;7f4(6<}e;d_c}CB0Ig z4A39{_uJXDuR^A$aWp~E|7U}qoan1BZFFN%-~2uJ1|K$hNf=#JpD_)Ey<87!Psgsj zzC(B%aE_Phj>?U~QJ;h-1Lt#K2GujK;P-0@PXo^D1f4qHcoiw}X8`AQf}KbH*j+%v zvlz!ZLGStrH3~|24&zt{_-E!-Yat1bY9#FA{`W$1T&2Q!xH_wd=ui0jhc8xtvo`XV zZHM6>bsYHl`-fcyc2*a?w7|c`#b=*7890Cc@b_KspZva$Dfjz?X~0jG?AC^4e)Vib z*UT|J<5+$M>xbuUj@M?G8&0TnkMS%nzl*3x?SVDfWhM>W3tW=}oCn1x_fj`h`$;@8 zBmHbe1MQnydd|azvps*Z{FuhVKWyKn7M*zDw7)-qY7URe;M+2F~^! zI$N^kVO#Ts%%29F=NEm;j-4=ly0sGH8C*W>t6FW#>B{k+&SUvm!1>w5`GZZjCHz>< z-wY_e?68mHbJ570b#i|d6(j89_*zr@o>uCw)W%|g{(19;cDeOXz16H=9QfHk@kz^i z{9!ElE#t{7UoGkpN=xGVD=kaHOkNcPUZ#K!%N;r>4IiS0=XU2A>Ps8j@+Qv*I(77= zKiy7T8Y1CQz~hkC{pm>EP)U9U%1s8o$JNmt=E#$uhJ4=dP$Hzsw|WU@|FHgN)*kIH z>z}14e~#yLZMpm$mXH1~CgHUvVUm7PO@w{i|CL)*Z>e6wGr%7Mx_VnLI>Vu#e|`x2 z;y4A}xiDPH2U@nU1 z814^27cyd2IfE@vUNq$J{6gPU*k2_%zGe|COUk2Hj_1*!k8tfBUeppe-jcq`@jMRn z6XQxn?1}b-5{CTrN`0c< z7XJAuao8S-+lGAdSaWC2=1-`_&ZxGx@Zc_d--7Ge!beXF(p%5BhK0Txv?6A7UBL0nY0)LkoPj zaPY}H!&rV)b742@eV}05xSwyoJ&tf{modQk{y)32&?m8JP7B#Krq4imDTwbl@IR`) zV7bz-RG-;31M4dl^pF>7zx%ovEXesa_GRw=3qRgM*vspJ zg*TiY6k?>({C(TAD&k)irY!Ko|P-vF2W7KGk_m2*fNgy zn-T7=D)_U29|-UJbEHvdLU<1H^|b}vx+dC{bRS9=;R)c6YAO7(v%u8053R ze*Ad#$U;UxJH(h<13J^BPX`n+l9$B%OxfO}TMNI%lvr|^_t6PzL9cA@v7jIGqR+xyM}vX-QDu7< zwLI(~DV5Ixne3;Fb$;wFOr@m-wq+GJAvi1Y?wu56UHB_;Ygk~~didFhbXx!B62!-EHRBYD(6^ZhB$zj+@~ z+k$KBY8^zCcM(0`@ALdS2XYS#c>k5oo<~dn5k0Se@ccWvt?<`BuT4^irsSvReME7f zYfwBg3$B62%e9pg72MiS~agTaVdU%pf8Wx8K57rD!y*GHE@1P^r@h?q>FJT z8}#+IX4MR~kH`di9&e&zg}o!s9Xk|h&M#j%kBSBT_Gx7r2ir$vf*!0-GU#u&3hhtr z-WPkh7wK;RJ?oPW`lhGm*8E@g5oLk?)!I!9g6$*X^*`Q6q;DteB_(|Er?nIle&c;Y z9Y^$?DDM-B13lOCA4OW;k@pED1NUOR_u<1&wrc%PkNom=D!W);;rr{0MJ8OA_X%Zy zpVw!eq}80Ou?QFW^wVWAj`hFqrn{0uBs>jx4pPn93nB78p{Vx4UhZE{bcpLD?-Pmv z&hyA8f6j~vwofPybR*~A-yCe85Vwb9(0yj9zT?0432}Q!1AWz5TVDm+CzPdV51F7p z*t>CJ(0xLR_K*YmA|Kwo9&DeGvOPq15dPYH;@Zq$`-GJ3ArADP+P7JP?GsYAhg8rH zI-J-!*ghd;d&mHNiH9Yc{xAE4vO!<&)v8~D?Gxhm5ZDfV=W8K;qB;uudA=Nr-!eUo zPgdk}J4&t;*p6B`HfGB0$N_qe^C^Ee*2(7&yBJ5DpRE=(S3bYV!#LJ?imkg~;PacP zAK`vB>jd^UcM^6?E>^5Kp9djYmFV~RyheVn%n168-!yDO`*dV`Nj~p0V0sJaJ@MPq z{+IKIQ$Rocxu>ggzYg6e#Nxh>`za^r;osczhq?SY7stBQ`n-NZ)fw#^{(JjHr4jOe z0ro%lLuX5T+(7MLg%|ylnfdYDt8yXhTN(+s0_T3BROP-WLxB7IlY9Op>z4xhd4EJU z4R)Td5x4_smB_{CD zZX8HWpx+sOpmC^~Df7xtfm|!-=4!tz6Xw4w7xCmgEZQOKx&PiTDZ%{V1V8(us=e^6 zVE%BuF6xKH)hbOQV|mF0nYyH|6s(GNZ?d|`TDOcXU;hVsYs0gp3P$Ja|8mc(<@Rj>y`gSW(?U`C>6QCeQ$TNeW9&ZVJk7r! zK(X#c8q@ll2mPQE{5&ps@LTSuXc3l;5z!n^GJRGC=s_3NO0@HC-#ylan3z(eB%jX{O6xA_htHARsGZwY8-$+E z6G{MmCeoeywIg-L{PLCd=72tCQp!x;H^W?{5AQ3D0bO(tq1P7!Cr_hsO1@~ENg=>ZCCfRo+GYT*exKr$f$#MjL1HxbC0-BA@%+r_IU~ zq5hjLAFheID*XLmO7E_eH#_vj72n4<7Xw#E^%VB-`r+L+6FU{%zHuVsF~E8KFlyVa zerI<(x&YV20pCs;zN=KDZ+>>|xbJ^HN%kfK=Xh}~7Wz!>eWW7yPl8kQi#f0-4Seq& zu9=O{ zxaF6JbuEs^7|{Ju@n$LBx5@H|UKx*Zpud?he|oTUEtT<@3i{pOjNAHO=UQ?+W`N$9 zbs~h$wUjUFH#i>Uet`OoRQNd?{M>Iu^%j1R>8al^A)n;??98{%ITPoXSNx)Qs76)- z^vZq4HpsitcikN>o7t!xWhnYPhg3erwF>*FHh*7!2JyxH+AH?^7yq=P|9!aH3wn<0 z@=bbV*8Ax9eT*C8gqSeXW(iZ%U6kbH@q6UG-skYhjBY_-Z!zOQCQXFf#pxLd?#?Wuh5G2H%DJQe1Q4g zz}db&XG1>dcd*|H#=TrV_602bxW}4d4YPbB7xeEV?C15>V~JOL{4noGzp|Si zIL!VEX0HqM_cirDW4}rDoi9E-pbxF~Dnk1|#E0QMVQ-hC6V19H@sR>~X3%|qYvQ>G z$zDG9hvy}2>pZNemT*4z#}0numCxt#e30TR3;Tn4J>>Ai5;isTCfo@=H`4N!%;#)Z z(0B)3qtN7g!R)aCH@q+GzOI@P&);FC@-o|seq7a8%*Q^xyReYkMF6pwWAJ;44R^~?w^ex^g^bE?Jfq*00S_?P-2 zwX2WNU)5jO*=KQd<4X^3wj>%Ku8l@M?*|<}t4ClmDhKKnjB%$$!tUq6_` z`VLupl>0a4B74lxH`*%v_13e@p|q|~7sZ(c<1CMpaiDv8IcX0+#}m|oUip4jGUyMS zfA*C3jmz}Pc~d&*kN?p47SBDHp5}YXc@tqY-*aO=lm&jrRuRwo0m3d{4CP)l-!meg zGJV+p`Fw2FVuo z%ko_c`K4!O{E#PKlY6ez(9LDjNoKFBt6yv`n%W8S)v7_lKAtZ=m~hzs@!IV?A5jhNbd_GF@R51>#1`B_T zdH6=M&PZ0~UDU3vki+p|1pUsNzcdd;oG}OKAH7uQWdYrHC0m7uN%5G1e2(|wCwsr( z_iTLpx#uo%{k1Mw^6Gc9x{abTe7M@h{MZM6*7`%($5Wd*8213@`dj~5gC0H2)0+d= zsN#ja-6_L&b-47F`uFKyuBQJ z$`SQ3b565Vc|7Iz?F9e%r00YAK9Te_4HbN>Z}oG(_my!s_`FE>d{ZT!$3)`KvWj+U z7$W@gU1;qh-0lfi4GhHl{MLGsjI(|TGeo_Q9{b@jH96CF5x)&`8E-Lab4A%c3vfH9 zFa8-L`^Tx^e_CDjOlt4C%sE0owsXzMUkb?fdBJZ(8hN==Nm+lxP+>Rw=TF_3M{@Zl z;H-aa{cg?W^3&#u@}2PSji;|Ik^OH|@YlVxr;)6m9XR_jdUoP$SwFs?l``PB1+AAJ#G^t<2hf4-mdf^J=nS?_2i+>jvb=W{c!UM*6O`vK}N_Dhv(01|Jf!VRFm!J`Li4R zV^59vRrbFZ`Fw6>x%G~Pvj3gH4a0;VtOGtf!+U1r_%{K6bg^A;-djUB@2ltd7|}oK zR6zWLkMa6X*7uS1w*a>zz2E+94)28_`A!A@oOYeN@}3#OIsVy>L!~lK%KCf3Z$mn| zearK*{)P{P-3H(*hBRIwmu~{j`cJ5E@tj;f$3NHKcWeKhC)b}%!GGxb-et0WcHr#C zcgk+BE$e5;{wI#_Qt#Zgb9~G3$@;k=@6P0msXWi&c=OX^9f;@2UeLFGwDk$MJEoWG z-#A?Oslv3zlem8fCXe+Pk&vb3IFRL8AjgJuO#FghxLr_r4&<|(O^zEw*q=Um&k8~q zr(739MvWOTVnqKzqec$p?SIt%bLXEP$UU?0PE7b+$14)!!?lJH!Y(K7>#k&dS6$ZE z1f2a8xsjjJO^m;jI$Zc(*4L}h$Ci3*2HQpY z8b%6x*zVtVb)75sPgcCI&GWTVmg&#s`wJ8JEl86Fum6tQ9m%&T2pHsH%EFjzG1t06*Z&8oa^8J$=xM399!4JnX zxxPrh6!^~seD$;Bemq~L`sBWhQ*Nui`t0x9b2)_T0`-;K9&M1BRW@O7_KsNv`Mq#z z&&u)J2)gD=&mQ7_SuW4Z?HF|RGvaH?efDvmMgHUX=aeyS4`auSi(ZwmBtvPID(%5c3LpsKH8PYDvGA4f17~i`Bf>yRG0rJg5S`-=O z*bze%K3wZSKI^@+f7^zFTg(?-3cU}!zM#IWw@0D(FQ2q`$$Ilx!zqvXZO057IT!_z zo}Qn?eU&ju_-U+m{f=@`O?MFq*HNNM$auDaW~QdF(&?!xYGyvbf2dUKa;c zA)Cn`PUN#c>=PbxbMyPd4V?SCryqA%%(SGh6}T7a+FJ3mxy}f8;=af*PWWX_*KKEc zzdqp>;3nYj?a&=4jtcS1$N0nRBex6mYbTd)10Ua?H%f1w$?@oy58RG)VBs~J_{A8) z-MDXc0zdZfZX<4MzH`4KhI=^-ID9N98+($crKhPG>;CI4^--Ud> zA8@p6d9<`q2q4@xUi9l+A9F7M-c;64^`Wqj`D5)T(n`1o`dLA@YIGM*8Q}i;GVJ5^*c8z9|NB&IS#D@5agjX^tY1ZU-#SBdt>DIG$jjv@%q*9 z6S1M(canTwzlxeC`pb-I18U0ryslw`oMBh~I4}2C-XVeOSCjj_*G9(e;Bz8PfAIK- z+@JCKl^b}`^ha;Y{Ta{y8Q*;>>wOt#{rG!F8;|JE$?;;EAna$nc7t<&%Jvz6Tafnr z`o327j}7_UUYLotLw6Uyne;;@nmAT$+G|K z;OF+ZSzF~+2-*wzhu5#1pc~b5Wu#WZ-N@(ls}H+wR_lQK@6RowKj8H%FX*@5uktJ3 zN1*A@bF6&pSB6Q#{AEzF?n(*H_B9`gw2^((f2P{~C-Wczvj$_{?> z>rowL|2vV->sJ-*)%VH%w*hw}ZLxapIUakde2#xF@JIEw4B~mbtUt#`-Fi8>_xFUG zCI{Ak+e#xx%laFDTabRUZq{q^{NJYFKig<_8=m8ne2#y%n#uY*!EZvkcJh@H zvi@%5v;9A9e*UpszE@Gc^;x%La`_zpTz^aIUcW2XpXsAO`*#)YJzLh#0-WQZcGCfW z$@*D(i1_39p7={rX^u~_-wuABkNr`>}JGX;up zKP$_#L5>~iN$txna(%gw&vI@qct4Bp&wS(^9Ivkszlqm>K(}p)*~)QCxEuLw$GedS-jMz21 zt)>1zhg{nM2P@#UG8a3{*Og04s8dzIwxE~#K|3h<_p z^%MBJOJpzKn{&!*3nNF3?N4ig6!iaPw+nJ7#C@TD*u6s+wkrqutZV6)zbuyRasZE- zDg1Ny(?`eoJ%1Wklf9pB+DE+O&%+**{UUgx$Pu zdTm>`X0kmoz`37V^5c*(>`SWmIN-bv|MLZBBc3OcJ$#SPDX$68dRgaDBjXcoV<-4l z3`Zsm7&y##Oo6{>*{(FmAM)kf-|Q{8iO=QLx)pj~PaQp7*4wMl%QR)<4c43V;`ri} zZ^8ZRc&ts}GM-A-%QRc~t+8f!>)rb&Zdh)c+^>N-hW(O)e5UIX5kHe9kY0R0WHO8A zAGc3jC@uH5F7WgCQgr>g$MSgV0PaCru=S<^^8K)-7oHbE{-b|de<{m1&Jq4#`CY!! zx0dCrfSZw8;%i*s`$E#+ihTD#v98hdtFRdPej*xrrGW0z0qsM1eanvf6$kJ_TMVC- zhJ#2xuXl1g{H(`~DeOzaUEuQ|t^If9TV*7E8}5HqbA_E@nZ*W{m2d-aBk)@ts$`dw z@TkGUf4trh-r~?j*?-m#gx$QJ)H^LJ_q`UJKD&!?>+pJ|Llm3I-n zQr|4dOT2yfCa-@p2hl6_)h`hCB|j^^r~EJa zrb6DOW9_Q{FZyPH{$a?>D#7%1Mg;1cE$K^f8f6#uvOQ#n|Gi1j#Q>-LSXG!R1O80w zDfY`UAE!K5;jz;q@skX?d~qI@Amx)^V-;~=xFh12=t&>Oxg5%;ef=)T@!S>kT)qeS zGCl3<&j~2kcVC0}=I?jj+&Z8S``uTcx%;ML779N((SB+_?zWKoL(+vVqUUoZxIM;! zZ%ajURUXd-wV+qVUn=N-eO|aJ*R=6 z<2)0;WqOKp5AvyIC@vihM0-^=6sZ|$R{EaIU~y~&J;$+evG9xSV*QK3;@DAN$Ypv9 z=-;VWcskF+MU;qsKUHC83h0T(7e|`3{X!m}`{`WN!7y!ozXrh7ZqW1l97Ee1mPH-v zn0w#r1H9i zx!)GZF;s0=MQ$g|?}8tnl$uvsVCBJ5{9<6A^^&`Iss1f1Jpt6@bdhe|lx&+jL0&m7S} zV-^aMem3x1pht<-f7?PN+}laCe>><}?oAw}m2l?gekvr#{+i711fLseFXQ7uI*DID zNX*MP9<3Rc+;fykKf_XCKfl+#r_$}BvVTp$S^toE9qP&cwE$=R-l^uOBm0;A!|y|u zH>KT^-*>cwpZz;T-zq1>BK$}5h?LC0`gejp>f2@I*-wHR@dVtB^!w6{)=K`+rr`V7 zYA|_wPX1fwH>L@Husx*kn7upe6Ei+L(lGHKlsZ>Jb6Ip8M&mNWWP@Jg|N>KJv&ye zbVSzQ1ix|l%M!L%lgl@QpX0sJ)!n1z@_D}n^Z)8S{et;})n^LiRbKx*g5ySbQ`Dyw zxC3dSgbpQTdyKG?_4)Gd!WU}EpKkDZk$zD2`Bd3nBk~Pj3cqwdopn^MFB9@PJ|n*@ zH$*SVPvQCi-LenX$Akl?@BWz3?wv?2@VgE4|L*;?cZ9D$;dmt5$xq60$`1N13zi&= zG!j+bMfA#XDiieO&UcUD=L^i?m#-M7azOv`lSQ+6&6VkCJXVfVgwcG}iSZ@+E8)L5 zq=eIboK5=ei%(6~2GQT~TJOoWHG8Ss_E{w4OPKO|rY6uY znY8;zggHOG@_VLM(7#Geyg=`jE9EQov4j5h#1iHL#{Be3eO#bFekAq~J%>@sSL)*h z{k_O(HriMy(^LJXE9NK0<-$MYL|=VsZTLPP?^kUSTKx^e=%W6}270cCK^0EEtw((k zZU@fa1$nlSB(Zs0t=RJ-y1+(-%c0_XnW(4^~a_95B#IH zgP*?}lf67FYi{znQ;a*ge0(>i<9Wlbr*Hr4--qkdU*iV;`H&Bu5YO3mYxEuJs8=w* zm-WN@qNA%NeY&?sl^n(mD~0_$Kb&I?t2ZvDQhneW6L4NTuW;ta>#tw9_B-?Q_sH44 z?H#kmw0V@}Uor6Mr?#41xtFMZ^v;G*D?*z{Fbqa0X z=G23s^_brcoaeu_Uv;QFv&8uejC;9!?Ca2c)PG~amh=46UGks7A?)Wh=pKuHh^~Gx z<}>E!@3XUgv-Yoj*YoP?FN|Bj&-HhpdaW}N>uUSO`RxbJ_LUws;NI}oJN?fTseC(d zwlC9F{q>n&ulJv0Mf^_SY~Nq?Gx}XFRl>gnN4T5Ihkd`l*)deDE8_27Nxm02uYv#A z`^l<$WkdXr(S5kiIUMWR_-@Z9ouBjxagcSQ{hC$@|8V=9`oLaC>+r+=_Ra6BTR>Od zRduUQ!Yw0&d_EU=-Jvyh!htYB(oU;RLt$vFiC$C^0|NLGS>39Uc%Xa)~`y}HUnk- zY~bhemvkTcrd+byI~ zNBu63o-aG#zvuF=BzKPu&wo-rJzs{tVEwWAE$`eo>UVjxJqhq%_w66N`^BNT`n5ed z@W1`1zrJGB@A7DSD&X&P)VD8^F?x}8P49nMx9Ry?B4l1qU|wt?ec+3>ToNzqwy+a6 zI=A#*m^5+37~Yqx;`fk4m|uLWv0pG@F*j?mwAo_i9Tp>(TdZASvG5^_VeB`wiZ&eo zq{Z%MET-`L(B+a1r@v@1cD=>yS1lH90DjG4{p-MQSnT4vC#hQ?2gYtg{Esab@w?n9 zyocNUvy}(_VzK#Gi}}9+p8@_0_^iba@i`l=y^3Vwu!zUyBYKxJ$#V)Y@RvS*^dnL{Pu;Cic%}1}X;pj(!MT><` zT5NvCV(Y62-)J#bLHK5inQvK4-)b>(8{)rXF&)%1G#wf%VmV+jwI|~Dve?<%V*RBS z6Z=`L0)6=1p4@WqR#?m(Yq7k_V&OQ8$yY-DdW)GiSj@l4V(2`J&9_=Cz0G2Fy~W71 z#ptZX)+USPi!D|zv6#zRtZ%khy3}G6&&`tW0WW7UeYwTP2Q2#WzC(w2wUs9e-~pr8 z*l_G)NcVBX1M@{2PT)P;#Aj_d{AKWNv>5-o#pEw6Mjo;l{f))U?<_Wfp+DJh@(GKH zzajqb2tR4D_z#PPr!3a-9g@n^HXMD%V#sgrH^aMGtnFbjxtGO6&|(vqd5I0@mx6b& z#nd4d(}!8C91c9fV)!Uv#9{&W>5W&|aP&Bfkyl#G#w@l@wpcmcV)wNcYiC+4o^3Jo zMvG}Yw+g)pycuA|V)P<}H(3n6&tmKS7Ry&yjN~nLKV-3TmBr@O7GnjAWnk+%8;*Y7 zV(tqTtJhmBRxAd;jri|a^ncG{;s+L6Kd~78sl^g7jqlpGere^Y-vNJbG5Dm#1~B`q z4Yz>J=WICfyv5=R79)%7{FvX?Vq-gt&0>B(i{X&PE-)Ro;RY~!s0~*R zvzR^HV(kcv{-Z1gS6HkZZ?SwLFlMoHip9cfEr#DDFN)` z6tG_sAD;g`&taZFv2JE|a?SY>SvcU5`;yQyJHI7wu=yVGg;y_6AMn8Yg<{qd^Xlu} z;5qu5FSGi}(D%NBX8w8q9vAlRvlgOn8FUGVebm>5zV_GOzpi!5ei!L@+FxleyS(Lp zEGF>_$**_dOUUMu{KDH?`_o^u{bAg^0`5SB1W-t~xTfwzn1SrJr7Q%{fo&c($Kt=HfSW zK6idv$Fu#U4&8I*asK^E5-;_$z5HP=;+PHk&R;!~#qrOc9o>V`?kl!lp15X@74_Qh zuN1oI>20)_zlqdm-lku3(uNCqTBSVH(}A8dKD76NN5*b?oe(5G_;stljQG-h*Nz>Z z{9NxyrNqY%8n$E6A8X(L+ao9R_esjT*m#!rftNr1@ZLwaFQk6{-WTSsLtzss+trhk0iKdxtd@f*YbKl=NJ?z88n=ikft7|z>J|3}V=UVT&j)*W;_ z^*{Q92hM%sML&HRW}&#`Q@*dzIo~o{qd0T)PMY^PB`SH z-?E60(A@$7Hc?(oCk+;P^|dhf#b@<%-D_dWl1K=Fl#0{!|ABY(!f_wz43^X8Afr}wUd zq>mqi{Ly}nJ@F4;yX>JWzs&p@&-{;m;`Jwm&Oi1&I-dGp^tx61{By@WzasHl?eFWx z*PoBc$+e^SP3zB3{rdXO2O1B(mHE^lXFXLO|F08&mi<((9nYH&CTTYx-_16k9lrhe z(?>lX*@O9nA!j~2-u9b!zy8QAA7*^?#i$RApHKZF_`t1y4Dx-0MU3b8x$dIhUBB1t z!w<|!4}ZV#`)AHxyXArYz9!StpL-p#bmz{EUwBZbr=Qw4eQ?7~Fer*}lIoPyH-kwDI;!cH8ej?i(*+Jj?e?_V`fg zvg^M={cTmg$;fw}_~P0B(H~D681I<>`|7uyxbjzTIf&_f%h4Y&AH3oV55NDBGvD~1 zI-c|UH7gI;a@`Y?{rRt-9_`};iAH7diUaaGJ;(bW|Fia%OLsi1-yi$w(LNr(c)O48 z^YRZT=A=h_?rpEV`lHtzv|h)ve8uS#&U$w+dky1@YCOI6AFsJ$Q~04v7~fLyzq|I7 zkG&!?@fXI|u)bygxHS9q{XV>Z^;8|t@$v`z{w-Nsbm)f|pRW$Lzeo02dBy2_-q&xR zEwn%CKWDca-Wh(?d;9Y>cdO{;+x5A3b$&jq&9@ zZ2qjDcLzVe{52;8>x{1>p5?#tRcr3MId$cN*Q2XM5iS|;sILvXn{Ry8d$ZsD=+#1T z+x%1G&wb&Mf9$H`*+k80Cyb~5i)TNx`;}k&pI1?TR_TB2q}!i)(anGBtq;UM8T|e=+xvsNUi{}PKXOlh zyktD}M=!YNC1~@S#sr7O3+EXJ-@BQhmI-dHs?D5)zo_yV{Co;aM z^pBq#-07+Jyl_6_8~Y90|NQ6P`?bgJ|J41RH2aDP1V1#Eh@?^i$J zyYHmH?Y-Mp@qZlg^#2ZfUcdI`6X*5&KjYc|{}TDj(jWbOyWV)@rf2^@?5%sQea${c z+)MkIp8db_{u>XRy6&O=dWG@q|F`9@yyacB6$j|_?EjlDd)Ic`d~E0IbUgci`M6g! zpXu)KV;#@_|NYE^SN`jR+xG8gnLqvWuag%ojqG{zVy3U`KJ5QxUpegh?|$LS{q_-4 z_1`RQ|G^th-6zKM9W~$7e({f`ca(SRuXh;F_VI5&Kku#&-8sxzZhsFg{mA;q z|Ld~L7@t%52fy)(Q{OiBuN!qd^~X_OUc1d{jBhIaf5@J3!hfa`A7Fe!jbF__{qmzf3?J6Ne=qGnT)qbm zYTy0L_x9RL(wqB=Emz4O<|5`Xk2HZ{>_f$YMPM5k#X2w#Yy!hrU&euHU>?{2a{nTV zeG2YZBoWR6i@++d3G4!cxDSp3lfW#n3M>Mfz##5#y9h@S&H{P=TST}DYy!K$AnxCy zz$7pWYyo+n7sq`V@5j;z=XrkytOMJ?FxLOP&xs?P2IhHx0IUQ3-?IInjc^#@I4}*& z1IxfVunqKM{TT+vfoZNwfq7sZ=*Rl3jc^#@G%ya#1IxfVFnF7_KMG6&v%n&-3Ty(q zz#!HcQD7371r~u#U=`Q}Mlla_J&{DX2+RVjz%H-}3}PNk0y*zy5v~G@z$UN@41NdY z2PT18U=dgaHi2DW5aVnVm;`2lMPL(H1$Kc^j6)nxlL!}qSzr~|1vY`fJ7GUi#vC*L zcs?%}-;{m*Q2aIFikN0CW%tM7GmdABz0QWPzZ_I9E;}cl-<@T~+uJbq_a9-s6*2H~z z2j?#HL7R^IgWRV}!Hx#j<($77SSK}*p6gcef;lhZ^Z(HLD-0BQZ+_g{=2OLYLC@Rm z-S6G)!LRo2pQL_z6Q$u2mq_9kHi(<7BwRKu?R$H=7yXFgtnj z`0V8DS<}PKrl+?Jz5cqjulDTbP5*x3b$3c~qjw9-N7U_w?S$=t_0M`|{pxyU{jr{O zy~JQo3J80i-Ua0%?u_vC%*iv;Yd6hK%?wKE_KObm9J=kDe|yQ*CG0ya_U(Z5y@j9o zySKoHOxi~V_YtulS^r3s$RjUBI~tQWVW1Xnwr4=Ln<4bHiQoiWL@B{6ooe7L1 zb!BG&{&(${_R97^Ou>IyU>Vp1c7T59j{+0GG%yD&0xQ54unVN!A?OXOiNWFY6l~nS_kcTN_{}MfaMd(X?sm~{Nl@lpuN;f`4J+( zC3gYDCWS9VsP$8u`#(@}Gmew*iK~#f}2flV3*IHB`W)mG<6|J;_FNWER$ z-$oEm`5WX9bJ1_|x9EAZ{9!J(3;A2@NFhD>S%h7lq(4Uzn2Uaszg_v>BEThjtI$J! z17VjZ=?jpzfucg>E!6^yFs|c6pK?^->S@QttL!(OZQc@*4=dJkeW#ybYw@BF53cL&Np`M;JF^DAg=?dm*;ysN=|>i zO^CQe59RNm(4g26df57h{3yaM&rLtB(r3Y^+$((oyaG_vh~CytcD}1B`L%F3pqH!g zKLx=B%8oYD_xX?5a=AQ7{|ON2ciKU@+rE1B4?W~35q5c^HwbwKNWE>WONvTH$eEu6#f~`Alb=G^nxC;8PNCrWyeN3cKMR(8Bk2SE>H4fdUu?W^l|Vh_eviEF9oDsfyJ2rl$`m!L5R3qJ1(Hmpx9AGdh#0xyF54j zxhj3&cedP=d!=tfZy0=0BYGP+&y`Se&O2;ZHAEAuj-_w~FV9 zRV9A}1*6}{r`**qcC?Yc&;NrhugeoVf{+ubw}JBsF~n2;3lBRe=XfA|u_J@@v?GtO z%M&|FkQ13-eqY;v>dKBX&sV7N;S$)V+refCt`)_&#J)g#xE+KMc6nkS)3aVhg)2Xh zN)3wMH1v?4L)hg>`WWOzAoZr;|C*A&9Qn|ni zx$jT5{M5_$%)&~(yAaH!+X3Y_*y!H>Vn-6`$H{!&imAxg&y(?2)jJdn}ECw zq+Y(y*HH5BqhM^`+*0c6pM%3VGm(;rR%M-mt$U8vl&GG*CFT>@&M+oMk zz4Eu{xmW%$*U1)o|BD@Qq$fXxu*;M5)Vr&b-j%O%*vrc6pLM3wZ-5YDC_^ zeOXt@cQudd<)Xdvx9|^y{8$m-5<9|w9Ucc_2)jH?UQyx7U4Mw)9Q2T1MA+p? z`XuBPAoW&puAr&pTt6;D8OW#H^`F?`@7VH@A41sWi5*eMiPX#Y6;p_(oa4Xt^YyTc z_Yo2lI|@ioei>nxCw5RT+r7^3KvCwome(hTt8_j?h!qKjcRdc6pNDlOVAFQ7`4EDZN?fA-{mI%M-l`$jddCjomVg-PggV+$((vycST*5WOM1*Y5x4aJ%0RcCwzyr@x3ImvTgrp8N#DE>H5? zAA0qAnsS#fdJE7)e%V8B8uA*D_ExaJ)>d+!*Wx;#e9Cu)odRM_v1h~YG64H}jMcCzu9Zb*pK~%VM?dLA^kRNz@xPLHx z1H3TeDG%ZO{)Cc01ViaJ@+s#yDRL=a4(Z7+BJA>{92Llk)LY!u-hVZf9lwMf^c(q) zL2$naaETrMXKeY&4(VK!E^0NrLJV_sgya1%$0-ygY`Q@;K z_LBbr2)-@?Tw+HX>HGYD+48zPvEvF5bUUY9x1$*Jke@`@<%!-Ps_`B@+sd3WfPF{)sde37Q!x1^6NrQq}~+HyM>;$exdv!`NLd&znQ;9&m%pl&vye* zK z&J+PIu_J=?#S-cn5Qu5bIgxrBxX+_{Ke6ORR z>{#Vt$0?Az_XlD}P1(^z*yZ*7iS*h}%~k>-vXapQ@fucqXSJ<7K?<%!-9fA7*N!R-Z<_@(n`J(`Oxp=bAOWKmdK?XMWiRcg0Rbz z{OXYFb5JF`SKLu{TnB~JOFO;@0p|hQ5!!yZKSU9Bd143kvi_-;a(7=x%9n*6@(T#N zJkgtgybPq?68d{X$@dn5x!z`>_rK_&{1c8`?C|+*`N$6o@Wf2)jJd8-P3wq~0o?n--Lu-(A%E!>m7+L-dFpO{AyX>$wfnzgQCD68k9MpF)G8 zH@KrMANdi4U7n=xApbbxMUBWKc%Lw%Dw zKb|YJfl2J6hq$kdebGEHjs3?Cuz~%y3ig|#*pCTff1(S_;Xb_x4B>vV49w$xunKGd z+rSL&W1?8^2eJO`0-IRxRk04rVLjl-yx9iUF)x%cp4EVPj2i*;haxcLw14Rrt-EbI z$vSe=FFe2Rk=Zb_adKkg3`DCmdPLHBJ#VB1>A4* zdp!JJr2dXm4(C?+ogRLdJc4sB{JxFX_nr8in;PB^obNkNE$nY*aBe$}d5_XyUi2LvD2Uu6_UWGp}f_eR1!zOp?Bhczz%1_`N>*wmX0Ni<^Wj_V9Z+#GR}f z-!$!+9W+eQ=iklR5eEM3OP8Pd{NXo01ASXwhV(>!7lz*z;QRM{f4z<0^W=Nhd>@nV z`|&*~zGuYubohP)&%^UPInQJB94ycO@mva@yYsm)pJ(!UAfKCYpOX7?+?V1$6!)FD zU*bnOc;CbO4z6Fhp5uCm^QX8=+Dj7t%mU$0&v9eT%)}cuZkU?BU{F0isULptt-iah zr$;N#W`2F@Raa2oj%X-E-p9^txL|yGX8MTrJ1)r)Q=nCXbw$ znZ9^(dZYP>*11y~(ve0aLeEG^_ zLaSFVACE3yKE5Jy^qQl`mq*sFT()BQvgq0sE00;TX7%Lc#CUXaa@mSilPf0IL?g?W zFI%y4)w0P|Yu6q#u`;r1<;471E&u;4D{&MqsTY3tC%A|8r$kA=DS<=04&kl)aoxn<%Jh#hsLT>Rco>czw5 z`Yg&pWcjvUuBqvblN+YT*V&da`+urnu)Wuxa2_tY=WzK_;1JJ8_@wF3_^kOD-mEm> z(9{}f?Q5qdXG0s)lcCA%_{7FgX2azADMJa3Pp>h7shJH^8#jk8+B7*U?LBl!+WY`i zNSgoDI;&)3Xv1V?X2ZtWBSXDh#4e71!M%pMl-aalGBj(3l1;Or*-e?uI;o54Ni+JGQ7L3I7kl~ribQbO zpBdOkoax&;HH(rPLrh&6k0P7#bu-h(rrD6`bA$Tb&>QSRYs~CCwQiu02Su4!H$JsKG-HIlB1%Hjb~auzbHs#c(o<_pFf=tO&`2Kk6 zCBy#P4)YmtTZFehURj@=WpX^#^wxRDtN+WVGU+FL|F^CD$9f~a4)u7_pelNUyJ=o_ zUYCAu2D;ghbQUwH$oSZ+S<{X}Xp(9rfacU2U-J=Pu_Hof&mUN?SCk$6IxF#_z8z+0 zSY!IM8S2f*iy?G+X2W_ju$gbEn!aP2??y8h&=MKX%v{kMsZG=-^Xq`2jWcxX)TPoZ zjO#cm4*QHQ>*X%?@_c@D>9F6{!9L>K5k5I>J{rkk3f0o@Ty{(oSIUiyuLSP+8NTUW*ke!PM$+=D?49>=S;+t5Z-z}yB za>Mw#)9ebcgwW0pl%tysH!;^?DSMvq>;_Gq)FK4$HTWh>XNTD3MhzIq~Z z%y?vS znhD?Tnp5J*Hq;AaWh1`UlVJ2KFDekNua(er(pI z!y`i|ZB{5Vt7j)STs*$o^wHIm>G6xrTJ&(Uyu*yXW=8s`5lowvYi8Z}bgwmqjM3{i ztsA$iE{U3)*wkCOn$?@R#|!m6DSqUAa7EckyNDMeRd1ZOD@u%Mb{yI%9sIjW_HGaX(}NMSn#RX z$@7c81BdN=E9@fj`D||;H9YgqnyNPo%-+q2%r*Uqcf%$byLpFhvX}N}W+Kx*re@Qo zKz6wkT5H_RdlAW2?Bcn@va;**u#5OPgttCko3-P#8KqA#>;8+!*O`@Qf3We`B>3NT zi`%nS%E$9?v6l_|ozEwT^nZf)b(|y3&|rENTDH`>S@*~t;^5|rtDwRCl{>#) zP0Xym(A*<9ju*SQuM~RuuwDNSKNBxU*o;%=?$XKCw1A7pH%#@$fc|>BHUget`L%VHY zy6LQOtLfOY$C<$-v}xKzZJ3pN`SIzu%dlu>7IP0~8l4%W%%XdCV#Czx$u)i7OSWPs z_ZJff58F8byNIh1w(Un6vrGw76H@26**;>m`4s@OWR^Xg{xaXpF>6h$pY2shXuY}X zoLPf$+1wyY3o-UNC3g)J`}kbDJ8a*Um%tuk9Q#ip?$co3p$LrPzP=4C;65~t`Y`J741`P@m%`5a2i19%>#<$O-1<$P|X<$R8% z<$SKC<^1lbmWOaoP|Nv!P%UraIhghvpQC9$zwfE#IgfnfI2We*{Cy2APr)87FX6eF zwzGimjcPfc^JzW&eU~|MJfG8g_Vmh*Q+w4C2z(((YFBWip2y&TQw z_g%D{-&@ggK4;SU`8zk7&)+}M@&eA?YB`^qYB|3@qUHP@5H06(S1sprSS{!G9JHLz zYqdO$=egPs{5=uP&*A$inxDbGjF$7cotE>tvDVM`S~Z`~`?Q?DKcw~W{WUFb;M~5} z!}qW>pU<(iJmt~f`Tm6F^LKN!oX;z@J$%nW^Z9!&TF&2d(Q-at*K$4w)%o&weKeov z+i&fkU7a=(Xuo(Ir;o)6G+o)^$^{{EDf^LK6L$T81qInNsPL-2!^ z^Bjhj^W2}7^Sp+Z^L(BwH-B&8z7es5b(sH9yB-Sxqre0(4a@raaKQIbR0Mo!6un4RG z>%bPU3k)2I@&jYQBrpTa153avumNlXeMh1Ezz8r7OaZgN0unhfl*)r zmR5gHh~?W ze+9}9i~@Q8(Lg^*IC9gUp5{14^yB{IWV6F!9zF2!OHb;aYbhOL^LzF8<4e}(ukJmD z7JV;5dg2m56UO;4V*apQ(rNPIrg*MOc5@Q!`YE`IX+#m5i$ms50z56Dt zleN5t^)}B1OCsTOU8MOu=cf5Q-=^jK-B+!L^O}|yu#VDtIFGn|^Y<2eGGuTrEq1K+ za}t;V=7A+(71#i_fxal(8<748AwJ^BP5w{s0WTAGN7!t@%I=wY>UQe%>CTZMcy5d3-5z>fkb2^MpnsLMTjEEhryiZ2_l5C!((mFX z#NU!X?+5cLJJio|%iLM$+&-<-?p@RG*s$iN z(CjND(3=+!&vVb$p8chVZ@cgvcS*e1!}=iZDiP)~yW{4$&Ey(ukUQI0y}lD|`9i?j z7wflgY#sjtNo(|O5!6@Dzxe&gEYb-__~u{lB38G(xc9!j2qhiQpO&3;BIkaut54)S z*Qw>)2i9`_9-)@!uy3a2e9u736T8@R`&wSW{hgL`eWm66{Xi|}@9t?i_ocO*`_fv@ zeQ7Q4;5`B@=ecz)=RUTU^L(e4r*<6eAMSf=KF`N%Irqc0ocrNgp1}JSy8UpUT=RMU zQ_FMMH`aP0SZ8W}#iQP%_#Ut3H$3!k{?dG&`_yu-Gw4CcnE$8zEE$8zEE$8zEE$4bu%OfMk zIT@GuUWexMd4!h7jvn1#c#c-{Qy%S;?~!PJ8ow{7<$MmJ<$MmJuW9N`bNv+_};#j^Er-|2R+(3-`mlAzQ?2GJg2Jr zSIDdXdiXQrG5+vAN9UWw`)4}el1Dq_x>oC{VZ7CHKDW|x-ZyD^9s9#t&i9mw-+xr=IzFet_!spUcZ4xg6CJjT_c$9g7! z=bKtj)`QP;(|Y`gdGu?)$2i0H9Cf~Y-m2yNp7k6#)*IR$AHJiY`TVZ3mS;Tbi_dd4 zpU-o(yy`Ljw_oJZ@9=wP+Wz*gqxnUTcIfk%$N79&+sXGzwVdaEwVeCFTAssvs_p0V zYt85LYb`H%+{fi!JlYR@4_52xV1Cqco)gw`?nh~P5bIT4uC7Oa31MBQ_3-(-mUACV z%X$7*%lTYh%XuzV%Tpfhf!~$XOgtv92h2 z+(&dg*7FgZo6`Ej9{1x-kN#UYX!LlPJl6R<2cr3DkABDJ zdYaGkAzB{uSns7g?B{uJSC84V^!%R1$?MEIBTTpU-U&5^i;qyGWmh-&N9J$B+9KUy>`6Z9`62ZA$%}?R`^I9J8*dO9|GBm&G zu@AxXN}A8}N?OkIN?Oiy>RQfoOj^$GcxXA#H_efIj9Vp-e#Uc8T2BY-SuHPnjB`9E zrTKA>ahKmE(fo?XxX$NgnxF9C^ZA(O^E)W6+>8TTow?(-ViVfOaRls9Iyzi0PDaO zunP>FjPe6xz$7pO%mYinDzE`;1AVVX`GFB&9GC)Tfdyb0SOYeJ9iaadlph!cCV**R z4p;zDdeqa=s0H%RCU=dgW)`2Zx7Z^ATvEn;X{M}Qw@e)J>D(EQepm7_@!R;vt=#DDUFV&g}d5&bahZA33|K?L35VF|Ab1X!jKQ(W8T6>%$B%&`4eQDrzXTJO5 zS6%#ucS7Hs`-Jdk?R{wj*Z~SZV!q=_IoDS#2T^#ugwOQcpCgY*uAuOlKll5|Bf5Me zn`3_);i*lTe;*f zx{nN&dVaCkD!BSHKKV_)?z{gt^bmauJ2ct5^Tv^LZ$FL~;d%&;0p3lsux#H?leQ zCnv36^1v!k(urTVPa1~24b=UO`z6HqA)9*V($c^@unZLaVn2D@*QMP=;qeka)AKwD zc|>vrh0lC>|4ANE^V6`8`{CpfUA~cRVR?z!wbq|yU=!%Sz{(}P_?7!FF~mm^Kc8RA z91l?sL8Q+(`g`YRFg_L?xjVn{y@>cz|FiE`*Z!h+jNX*TbG|%tW=-Pl?#Dw-IYeI@ z`u%BJzB7KZ&r5&zl~4U%%4y=ai9&94_pW1tZ<~4JYcDue0zG>W&-wEF3pRZ#^WYxS z5^vIY+Oyuno-Fhgfj3>T^Y!;FdHM~|H|P8$?UH!$TOH}zK&10L*LtS;%$acHlJf9- zs-Y?CkMAwN@H2l(9sn4F$9uRjP8m*^`%PX)OCuJgX|s?42-2xV*fCO!1EpvQNiE$3@ad+oP!4?O#< z=rj3=&fcX_ghn=J97;fsM&Sp1i~9S(OdpUx%th4s{Qn&mTcrIk-wMhj@~CgDFXz0G zL3|0w_7;EpV4M(rJYSY_04`SJ=y*3iQus56|It9DAg`X$Q+M`S22ZIX)6& z>ufo_P|`{|eD=-cU@z(?iq!Ql?MOjC%Tq*H`g3aq!~ zAqvm6i~1tq(Jrrg=XsVS_+I(ydiKhjDc%=bs*K#}Tyi zkRvyK^gLH@zO%YfzAWf9o^gE4Lf;wB-Tvl3eXiYm4b1eLZHsZcE~DSYFCyppY`0!V z)n@~G+m5|54)J`P^|SHD4BGMOHoyDuASw*GJD*D$xr`oP6!8)kyRzHZ^^&$Xdz#hD z=Uc)Tdsz>}9P|}|w43E5N_r^=&!b26-Ul(p$H&939BL%Hhil)$_K2&RoBb z@^2jJXeaIBc@^4~0x$ioVY~8>d)ZY~cJVy1>xWTxvEExwdhr*}L(#4-;tSUe*L&z9 z>kluxB8V3~l0WN@sOyn-&~Bon7rXeLhJ>Xav(Vpe4*RP*k6m?T7sp#7>x=d54R2HABEh@FL9~J7_nN{^B_{+7+I){_0+A`#<|#8gegxWf3oWM)`&HMSFy2=Cy5ko`iNC zf9l5mE2iQ%#tUECQw{mFfwa%RaqI0oh^~rNz%va>2>}GwYob+N>2G0p4U9X)Z z-v4|1{uAvg&0|-^(JOZGK5U_Ob)EELR}JUnX;)yA^-JJ#)&3#(s?Rv$MUU9U^X?0^ ztKg&;yLjG*c9jud!TtjM)tJYwmZMkdi|w8`r~QLZyNP0lv_GCtqWrCY`hG&<P7 zJgWc`=+|vv4(%d{`fUI+@Q)w%lpMQ^zkC&}7b}k3*!wisbwtizr@vl2V=vSG`uhi| z&DM{PJv#gG&XqI0#{{B>@8c7>53pu(V%?eJ8RzLiufHwILr)o4`SZt*So)E7UMM-5 z{QCDfe4o|i(Z9^!bM{NR&?6*MzdM#*W80U6&G!$+SUzI(QduY!nY z{_zof*G}q{{CG(`$0O=-^OJJW-^3E~sR2co=;8ArFFn*t^uJ@!-c9|Fb-#|^^K$l$ zrM$s|?L0;Ow3m8_Vu$gokM%2I6F0~H$kkR~VK{$Z3gMC?H~N;O@`HL3dnyOn^n4CQ zztRqdX%Bg{hdg5FokM=`b&!9=kxRMgSL$JX5Yyn-PqgbH;fY`4us5sp@w*?wllEA3 z;$@$e@yxeG{SMFEr*Fr2mYe0`;)wF5lTP$A9eD}HziZ$R;W3_iTJTR)@#tsr>)@q^ zc#Fr_j;Jq>c-k%gkp9SaL|%nFhbZ=u$MVFHZ_~+F`o~_P*j(f}YI^OIVPg2*13yST zR!8&?X&2Nhx+Tot7nQKlHK+aOptmrrf6)FNx#-(R6yXwmw2#O{dOF==-H1- z434rZ{2p6gul5^7yr>a<`#btfc*m?0FZIHB`a6aAyu*|BOS@RlEZ0)#r@ZK-6a7rb z_7*^VP4ToIw%@Me(a+RZhyOykK|7Fk$@->Uam3SZF!tv)`FJPf2?`SO~bpE~X>;-#e&B zqh|^CrGk!J>VtY%A05~mb$HUxYLF)!xs)d{Y0JZUXZ{++R4Gr=qddI_99t<*)5+H@ zPur18d8miwsUhC~z9E133Xq2!xv_ap{bs?7J3N!m4gvV%<*=FMPYv^YI=+l_dBtNp zWB*8jS8;e!4-v?lj=Z-{*m2?YAnoTc*ex)s-0}Bsyr$GXE4Kd?Qv9J$!Bj7At7Wk=}pp?1)>BjU)#4(g#DY)1))Cw8zM zr5*VwfBF$$aCmMzIs$gH9hHZ9J{_M!xf_bdde!Zy>+r5DXnDM^5uVtUfZmLw-}rw= z_rAxh6SikP(@z!fSzgg6JiTtNjpPm1!_-#$v67M4?$Hf`XK?Hqjq#ZcJ?nsAK#B*Ixn>4 z8PpfYb*}5(a*N;Uu&1l+=lf+W@7D5@anl`lq@A(f(;n6%?MZ*g`Zo&{p4bybIPb`% z{QQ0o+u?lnxb0l*amOF2NA_>p(?x#%s|NkM=O4&}j$G{Fcez-u`RvjD;C(ss&qF`Q zH~J$9c~R$&?? zP9k=9v7heBd-~rweE-IB=zK)KkR{!#0Ie!FuN zjB2OBYplN_K+z|5>F-#wyh-pJwLQB=eK%~BU;Fd8qhOR@E6Atr*d^_a`vRR|`PiuM z07?F=f7VC8-c|nOv7C{QTEE1B;up!E_mde%ZdA=_r$NLQ9iAzt=X_Cdc;bJ4FO>5I z?P`MOnD2Af-JB1_US95eF)Ci{=R81+e9V@g_iYJ;-RDc7Qmj5b0m@8_q)MU8Y|9_qD!jtv`Nt$D204chA57 zSqNLRL(j)yq>lq7z4(XgJ(f3vcz3-gJhlUlcU&ju9evV&xSv%~a_%p=ejjCj6X`lm zdbeM(AJbp{qV)^QqvPA~dqnX#AFw>U4@o+_-Z*))9gl-*pC$*MDMSAfKEJ!WkbdCy zYueFQX8w?P+R6HHyI#y>pV#(>pSu!JSsig4cjr-cfyzU9K`dqJoJlv zR6D97-m4wajx2Z$N1ymHihSabv;19zUB62?7$(vWw42`e z9mR)j9K`*YzF$s&@8&1#)KX;Y z&t1w$H)oxyo)5D=sw46de>ZO&?l@LO<+3hkKP2-0RF4Df-^@S!S?iY=Q1X%b zq8|D`fcUh-llsalJIODA=lXBd{3iMFlJ-dZh}@@Qdu&55_o?*!#B@Zx4(EKub&a04 zIPb(iH|Xcm&Z&=n;e6$mPk4HqEjfBvPVujv2lL?79lrQCjQ-$rNu?OW2=u&+vZ@$}RrU>*ECC-TM+LFMmg(1AEx-(%`%0k$x0a z9HvN95P5KkV}^q&~#H`Yj9V=c(&Q_w&3;Py4dqD}Ri|N6u4& z_Q~`Or00C4{l<35{nR%2!V^D)RX(hzKzZbNFs9d|IzQT#MtZ$Zs(;Ue{G3OAdVk6* zzb4X$)$`4w+TUXNIwSHEe-yDEU0}Nyi{ZPD?szq79Lavk`g6`Wg7vo^M+)G(?V{JO zcH8>%298_eC(~|yZRl~wZ@I7H_(J_erYE}VXSZCex8Rp;xgtPaKh)F3^TD*klk&vX zeJAx6z@uGWdU@ZZ#{>QQDzu|LLa*47{kHAj3$6FAYFFAmmLu~O>mS`Nn<_oqWgdLD z+@t0L$&Z)e&Y2Im?rT9G_pS7N!2MFqtn~zi}QUa-WOqWwCb@kLzI0pTZNr@Els|hOPUB z`y8(Q;ur2)u$+15DGlixtoPWix$jqZc;b&D_Wh!eQ*Q@hH-8x~_*~FyeaUtm|C%k| z@H%TSKk0cV1-|%6?BaaNagTQ8!BcjP@%MCwpMTH24`?C%LZ54Qm0ew|>r(2ucIZZ1 zUTqiGIm7*6?m8)p^tyf5J=%9+M1CgkIs4N*FUa=FelC7Ce9!apiF2l>_+e}_zVvT% zgB4rOy*}}ot16#+{1c)_;$x79yLSHh$Xj0jgQw$ne^272K2wONf4orm(#~?=yYrGs zGiTpftxNr!x9UhQ`bLc>ZN$6dkK4c4J}cDo_2K@i??c0gXSrAoK3`2Z=}r0kOt0Uc zV*io!^8BFeq!arX&;C$Ad{yyy|EtSUAL7lu@9rR8mxIq~gWnkVLF$9!A~B2fF^6aD z_Iys8ba>KE_`IWy_RVtUz*BaO>HA0ceXOqTD=E*9kW0S&-3IFCeGJ2FSE5JC%`lPs z9D3YmnDZv=@P%%&eoO#GF6%DV8}sM*&2gV$?vHq-qun}P*~w4Z6Z2!cDj>c!#GCt` zS@4@^2h7MAV&?b$`2hMQ=D}k*i0P5M!8l3#{IIJ)elOp_yhwdq_f-{-{f_!NXjd)8 zqy6kZT%Y=H9<+b)AM>NWCiF!dp0uyDYIo!(!E@Z$TPFmu-t@X}V85s!z20|?BE6nJ z>m%~(jnB8(^8qXm?a?UhO~&WYE!Ge2_-y23ZM9z|e51qjcO1qunMwX|g3KfJm)ZT_ z9Q6Nc|CjuB#XIl6S@ejVWysk-SWjMd*1@0e98;I&`H)+`BcA_!%f|O7L}Qn<1KPoQ zNkd;0e6incFKkx{@KO#>%2`)_q~1L97lpXQ?{T$%AW?39Y;P^3*Z1A}yb<}`5&4OI zTyHJpIg;3?&q32Z)+5W8t6KlM@1;t5eLuwX^dr;PkluYSQ0|XjE(y#<9@~q^%-?g? z6~0>s?LhL^`vj8C%+Gzj)Wdm@n1mknUS0n^*7R^b{r6Jc_tPYwBP0V{VlVX*YtWKJb&Yw-w5tj+&9} zE#st@_Lfxl|DsOX0rfJx68Q*>Y8Q3rZ4T@2x4*U{7yZ2-%z;kPN4tsPZx708?CiJK zs3R9W$IW9`27Isfnp66Ycl1g7tvT^hFN|lslo8)>c+!4p7uy5NwF>$vZ#n5iKhv?j zB@yqxW8e?r&C&A?8y{0V`kDFy(3c+KEgoZi)2;&IX}6dy?U(I6+8M*d$ae;QkoFt&Xus4e>ZP5WjC=%)t~ujc9(s$z`upv-?8rsm zDM}yhBeosB+kU%_T=bl-^l+RdM!svy>(zc^h!-`Y?+izu3GbM5;-y{~Pk*NoUvPNR zerXr$ndLeS`YA6t=|n%%vAqQmUspV>hvToWHmG0GM?X_v1O5vS@fMGrr0hx{o_0&L zv|qLZ+MgxQAxggF(N7uVTXOOhf1inb1&oS0?WzO5u0Oti@4ItQUeR~9(nqt1F^6y3 zRsX&Dgd-RGsfYISJ>`tUlXl5-oq0ztcD!L8JL(SKwWI0C#SZGB9ehu@>+r;m{yEa` z4g4|6pB1EwIy{q4|Gxh$*vd)`N5_$i9n?cR*e(J;7}USm!FCaL+oGW{68Gjx7a~Fw1e#;?C``6wu_h}H)WnP{;-s%)oB8i^?$1r{nV|cT@3Luex3M?j9<) zumAqDBNw~3gB`>U)*pV1Pa(9&DDqD@>D}_M9K`f6ZxQQ1f%R`4>)Ep6ErUG;+~@hh zZz$e@;Dxv^1AbTWxPIYxS(?~y3;kr^A5)G++e06}%Tfd{?(lm1ocO(C{auy}cx?Zo z&a}@Zfmhpe7!sCtM*r+00&~@oPM`N^s_)W~-yD&TX_sUC-Da=-cjg8GkRRuiuY~k^|CZnB=6*cOR~?a`v{U9!be{`LzvOfNOn%s& zCDzUT=a7+~+W7gNqw;)N9DGqDc5u8T@;RCM-emv1zTyJY^E;E0kNB7G<26-!mY?W; zU(%#o!hRgQci0cRi(+$eeDfhbs(6fN{qsG(gu@emb3D!t%lrAe&xwW4akJ|1NBR@- z4TtBBGi)bp&+TDezn&RigZ~1JVSnso-O>L}ANLKS!@NcGX8?LKz?8$2aiR9j(dVu5 z;IY0W+a4e1jTU&Gbd2Zty!tomEpVSLr+&Ux_4vL`7<_FXf6tnJWIT~_DUZ}|4tm(1 zMK0qV{l|K%fH&XyI@U)We9G z!sEEldJaBd?H=aMJ)hzOF9x*v4$d7=Uj=rh9iFt$D(WSJc(#|qi2S9TP4)c;lylDe zJ6s>==eV?o`Lt=z&uw`{pV*arkv-?cen5U0Jl8K$f1KZlJV)q5{fl0)pWnxK=UpT3 zzu&-m5Wb8DdfcrcfA@Td@R*L}D}&c`$|bxVM6tQZE7HCP2jv$Y+b4NEUl?|H;-@Ia ziyZP{e@TGn`bpMzeta)QY><4YpW{jy=~#cllYG+ZoI3f{5&4Lp^XmCJ^W*r+`V9QS zmV2Sk@x$Qv?Na$rZvs5G{9;!S^B&t3?V95Uq}S`fFy3EeditT}kzc%Rzc=fi=M+0A zcfViY%H4ICj92b@OX`i~q}}|ERH`{>M@ChBy*&vj76Nk6K; z6%pTbcqX6z{xto>{5r$DIqRS};)4$j>=C{lr`<`1=lUh*$Vb`D z`H$ZT7k`=b{dQY((u*J6?|+LQ_mKqVq93^~_dPNwpKDLRkxM--waI(`i~fWYFZvlz z{ak;g9G+WG8Am>lpepQhsNg>q3J?e;x7>=(ALup=L3 zcNzI49G+{po=4KdygBns5bdj=cpSHBH|w+N@MNCg`-6OsgZ^lNXUfpOO#N)n^YI){ zB~t2_={Rmge`)=r=cTM#?~3Z@cRLSd70yC8R-{#?!N}U*x#F%@jjeB z_un32mucTi;(@JyKPdLA(dCb-a{&GFgRjf)$9ebp{9Q(ReSe|PAJShnkNo%@rTOkJ zg1@%qTj>2o1bq6t=<(h_5~Pxy{Zd1` z*Zm)P+_!BieQXbGhupXI{dQ1($(QYc<<3D*Sn=2%sE_kEtKr*&djl^}~H2u}ji(y%+rbpdE~Azdppr9G=Oif1ky1 ziTNdmd2{wDct4R-Jl#%dciG{&@UnO zG0f}tC&qJ~n^ipBpJ;c<;YmB#H zB;U?Eti5fOj^!otcel7M?3WwA(-!*Epxn}*ct6ehh%?@~zm#I*<$)8QEt=B!7!uc6xk&qId)JZJ}! zp2Z-#zjtQZ-x7}7X(yeOcYkq^xo98Ht>hh^v|r9+B}YCg-wga9I^BF*PCCi=Kp~im z`SP5K?}<0tDp9>L=x-H+sj?YM-3x z=vN}&r{eog!jtrMoFl0^dPmg{f1k>I|4GWl@whurdj6i6`aP)rcpUxfz%Qf9&G&I& zcYi$2s&p(bk?-B;e#rN`Do%RYpIjvw;FA5xjuS8Kp7E@&CgVE;`(?a77CP7-S+6UV zJm91g{Y=O4un7H8#nXB?US||<1@fc56!aB`c#Fr_4ry-<@w8jih<(eHz7X`amA=Ek zqrSl3tbh6o80b3+Jo>YRb`%9)q9xxWz|;LUrFhJj`byB3cX-n7IS%XhrFcF}vK!S7 zJHvXG91OdBe;?Gp*h@XMgX40@;Yt7DxEyulqw?kZJd&MB*UvZWq?3G4f<4Ta<8smA zNxmGHD~??9WxpY&5Z`ooCZGPed_3}FJ$HtA{rAfl--Q2yPY(O*IOx&!8yn^=qQ7&f z*9!Edhk5{0fbpLBu%C4up4?aXmfQQ_82GH8 z&_B>GP<{bp*O-3qUF1@~I-e}k>*tyJcL-=#VMKnT%FFMq@;gVgtBBt%bN6G6z5VCx zykDceoJU!&;iqhQ`JEoioBO@i7Ud3a+9eU)ph{SAjF{ULtL@Od8cyWqKgl;>g5Teto^Eb+9>M?ViNt935( zNrCU?BmJm6;=2xFZv^XI^63wTiR>Q@=%4R97`|t$-PsSh^*s0aNf10)T=0_iPdiwy zD)NnyZ^-WW&vAiHGLA?d=oa}q!5q}S2zUO&uq+jUsJm0?t{^;3-^Pl>> zU>H2tF7x-C^$7RR_&rwfq11P4#JnW_V!vQ}E+Zeep2RNBYdOS|UmIbUdm z+Vbmjuw9Su%tXL<{b2IjzNP9@%I&rX)^8r^b^p=x3i+iG`AI)*)b05uuY9^5`J`39 zV?O@ptRGal#`vB5`OXukkY4+-slM~caV_hSUvYuoWp8-oS5@yPFu%4(e)_y4{mK5$ z^s(oye-`?C21)QmpS0h+$L|^Bz|(%`?~G`_bH1Tn{GE~cez&!Wd^*am%Ij&LmyEvDupI3&#*M8{ocO|YK_*3ec>q+L9Lwfi5o$&N}k>_%Y;L{HcoP*VVsEx48 z*yuSg@tiu_2j?H!$={c7+ikD^;yxs}jrAM(F@#;e$oO1Yvh{UT5$W_i(DgW1R34F! z%yar263eCAy>Id8cCWu@!g2+{cgrRD>FiO1(|+gg{CU~M@vZ&8XqRt0 zTMpWl#JN8HE)DgD!E^2EtwV0!dOOb{oo?s)JRI{WjL1jYT?O?r-+0?b`h||SzA;sP zkMTAPo?Cty7XpjzJV3b@ihoTxd^zaRzegR}+3I1xolj34dh*WwjM&pyYV~lupHEL< zdt3hCRfF-{q?z-*-3sjn#*j|RW!imzzmfJ6lMYYpG=y{+u3fx*qv)AJE-D8?~>+-xqQ1mHw~ilZ4;;Hw_f~#Sd|=H?FgOrymO7 zxq7Ajch$KbFF&-AUaxPODn0Y_?O^S5^OJs^f0u1XUil=EPWNm5J45W(=@I#eAGnTM z==T=&xnnQ;I>=AAhceDP>Gt5?ajqZ4KHiT6FCDI@QTvI;hjX42^L|+Dl>X1>jBfw$ zjSKf#{ce92ecb0KR$ylxi1K^xbGICxlqZJ%P=K86z`tZ}`K29nj@tTr=_#bs?LhB` zvK?ebT;==Wpt5d)Sr3?|95Nuf}$=epu+dngpMAb+Hei*YE!i zY2N}b>s0dZw zCaEU6Y`SfwOca|+lS=>h`>yYI&ogVkbN24{e?Omdp1q#+tmn3#b$QoX@0tqfe1GNn zdmr|D!Kn9z36`Jh_kL4GFWX;hywdwj0Oq|YdSA6;^XjrZge>rv0y)=AT=IlBkrZ{|8_j&y_j#WR0TZX}YfzYd`I zoTPqZq=(+9AJvQK+N2vdbYVa3`ER=YOFkI#fnT%U@6RDC@a2sDR`PXz8FWGU>2u44 zL_bcTuj)ba%gi7AJ(-z)8YA7HKWEyXCEd7@8^)Vwzx*{RzEGSG`t|gR%bvGqS9f;J z=-1f})KAOKJn0pW5M{q7mmj4AAp9+V31&X)#zCFGtdnp0T8HoGyiZU*YQIVMbyz*% zpXu+!$xr@?t>NtS=_lB~&$ay~*}uszu+R2al2@g?8TUYY^D~v#K7z`(S>E0Qjd=FY zeXIPY_#=2!KE9^2*WT-kdeHnrQ0IWOKM5X?qjMQ~@&O*@>_tPbL*`ObDuNA=hqEI(b3lLjBrv-i zR8Ofvy6O9pm7gWQyhpc#tHv4iIBMwN5533N3_eP4oi7?zj}xXm>S-g&xA*^|p7tc( zuczc%eSg?`${2hwZp8Lxc>w6CI1wB*^j43G!9x%6kshkox}k#}YM3<c^9<;V`j)?^=Q(RTKl$qloh{vZ ziN=4?mq>5@0KZLfoo+7c9?-+z_tQD8*qwv=YW+!i>s(!zdcdx*-gqyYzn_s<$JuA~ zjgqhT)YU+8#nJ>MlPb|al0VYiO zC_B9GeB$DtTzAk8^~Zu)=G*Vb5D$uP-;TlnznQ;lU1q*-hkl2vZpyxNkP|9H)IRMOi$kU-?n~Nv`kwlOY5h{8?o`(xaZDFOtry z=jBGSuAiK3y{XCab6sz0dwP|54#Zz?ni`^4oa;4%{+j8Be9HO3Uk^;PyuWW=BE9d2 zalS{-CU1O*ya|@~<#nRvE#IEwJ)G$coPGX#zkiRX+JBDp);_E+q_%dyccpkz{Ht7T zh#Y^PL-dUZId)tUf1S6p=a(@b)B9s=Lua4#^3NaWI}NQPfDYv~56zkKXou>T1k=nP zF?6x-k?hg;vJH<;?Nj})^zIlsv`^jls&x$U?UByb8@^xdZtCi-nsV*5 zwfiSdJm%Jmj-nryD{SQaH(T6}lFs%os4vNv-aYPLR!I*z(7Wudhp1m^lFsUle!9s1 zb2h!=Z;fuhWtR8bQ;PIf9_&y(N-y0LFs%QVy^7B=`O04PKdLA3tw+d*y;Yt^8QiCw zsaKEXwO=WD4c$lM?LQ_qcK)&UqCGcvS@wCu5tj4&jp~r!2P{X(LA~dAPINBwJousP zotJ@qHqO+4#5Qqu`TL?pue|)8B)#=RAa8l~^P1-mlQ+upzCYSS{85dN2Y*c8&oIYz z%jx&4InW38OwS+v{YcHnX4{X+-M*`uh6@ikEzPX1hUr>if;v?!BtB{9Nz78YjK<()jM*do?*k zukIY@JK4>gUH*J0&i7@%zbug6)*Jkg_U^HS-oX3!TLO=I*7&CO+allG4TJByiYwJa zgLD&w;D>sf@b-H|AKN^--X^^J&7_y)Nv|Ty`~AweS6=c)BjiCp-3L6EelHc9d5?tr z1wG+co$H-#|1`OUv)|5l;D5az%HAIJ&X8XI&^RbMtv3`6U7*kOxrd6uLypdgs=Veg z_PrV9^&Mc#ln-KT#{8?n{H~!3HBke^h4v9~$<>9=V;(*_ScMeplrzpt`(j+pXM zdg|T`@BWMBwC~+8S+1_ zz20l*Vi)MU|HHZJAWoL6a@?}>FW^Ta@YZjNhj_->H{0)QYo4AWz3(^i(|2Hbk52uJ zKTjF;==^w{qF-x<4t~me_DOz=bhaJ>e=M)@+4>3o@Z}}9asKeGNkw9EvNPD z+17QcEI-$EojU2^fB2y`?XkQ+f2$4o&Li;-=Lc&S{I2uYbD5tY&J_Rhm%cx; z>jB`a^Y%05{}Fn?ZvB47Y<5qvyl=O@)AQ%8@oi_?jrttheU|f&Ea%r}lIxFZf2z;X z2sweTUww$ZsNg8io5r|bF+y0q*v)@OFLAKUbJU&7i63)tf-rxDOLwnyu)^sM{joNI^o!tT{?D)gBij)VYcD$4Z`GCTsluUE_kcMCvI~vN7y8s_^QLlZ+9?x zhl5SR{MTH1oUn11OIPl7aEh>bze}ga9V`&m9(U>34;>sOoFr^^9Db6p!1Kb%Cmg;? zn0nHs$A9Wz;b#t(f9~KUVfhy>-6f3wnskJT-!M(sC9M3`;m3K;Xo2@*)_K2Vg7+{s z2&bNN^m*RjFitr6cZW~B>R^iBQ&$PcUvu~Zzwhl57WrLkn=r%gI_rdq*Il^=VeY>! zJwcd{xpqEDSeWP1UBZ$1F5Mx_EpX{3VQQgEj}sR7y~#LXVL8$-?_erUdcyPyEmH+oajplH3DbO^tr4~fGn^+^3C9UboR^Iewg|hNe-%0Zm?A83+-(zP zIUbD=wg@vE4{C%M27+-eHgS%N+qS_6)ScK#||jh-?qno zCn>+peA)ArMLQj`@J;tj+mi%g@CfR@#50yIIcv${lMg;)>6yo!apuw!_Br*$)AlT% z5z>Z!BH#GCoP8^-z0xnfan}28bG(A{S@YdKi0lGBSbvEX*B->HK9C>G8|IbC4{6lr z=t_>h=HY9L2Kk7-vwSqZ>3we|`pRmI2V+iCm*-x(#5Bra6IVrfL~B1d@{Q@`)+&s`G+6gVZX4t zgZzah;zjq}t7{`F54#mV71ANk#)FUVG9K!CxOxM9DCfYzdR+gr^|g_QC&*vaCI9i= z9Np#DFCCLknc#P>MjH-ad#{6?a~%BX^;`T+bdDR|vlc9$A$@#TXLp+Lzx)6BZ0&Vg z`UL4KCpx}G(!c-TKc2pOO7yV5x3#0Ik`8&mt3CLBnOw!uTfachsT&+#b_pK*mFAOC zc6CTU%|GYt+x$=8+AYeiv`3#I{g3lkck~Wv?NYx`BAx7NuITiXe}q>%pVlYHfL)Ev z+8&1l0K7nbQ6@{I{m*JN7*$(`dq=$$9Hpnc;ez@#ZieSoxlI+Dc|4FXN>f+V}kUTZgRzAc5H&(pda=0kMH61f8Y-rt+O16%mexf z_8ZbCOZw%WxbRC_BUKU5kCR^QafI|AJteuJ`dmw&@#t%$Kfd>&9o1J``o{jwe+iar zi~d`0j%!XMdc;M7?XO2VemuKl>nukQH!ai{TAeik474rcS*{<)WsKgU_0zDIp5 z{~*3z)%-=Uu6~`cqcr=?4q=yYjP1Um_D@)2J8TlR2`34AgbBt?nlPvIyIp+b2#bWH zgjK>i;W(lElaT%fAK3d(?f(dBoDatJrHl7J?f64a?@vX8b~&&3s9TR|?dkM+c+c}c zeP(-O%@gNO5wEs-)A`3x*d9;d}1$GPV>+g3tJWr{qq55B7a%>oG?V64EYrZ zcYpb(3vb$G(N*H7*cDXlzxT8=7N4=?v{ON+2l`cGj63qH)IQ!@{_*wi22C>1utU7c z077r^6;zu%WbtulEIH22<}LsD-p&ut*M7a-9f$pLEARpT4Dm?o0e`LI2_~4i`;t?S zKVfNM=?TX#Id1V8{klT7l{Z4ZyF5H^pVgoE=l78hdG#UkRs})u2r540w=g~&$$*>* z@>~BihoAMp{cry>Vk~&tIV&n{(g2~_l4`X-{V^3L%+rl{Zx;F>YLwl!YQXL=1W?r zAInb?K707e3l@Lz_Gv%I_ldS&dg8Pop)XR)<1nW{QU&@sWU{5^cR#JF8;yY)l=oIu78g2>-@3* z4R0Cw%UK8QjeNv|+Nq%0)9#18`-J0`9Df4n^uX^K@+lD3Ye&5Ly?b7r0uA`dUP1AF z?`cai7?7ff(;__T&r{u7y7B8l1AdA#LHYfF(G!-29WG-U z^x!u|K8g1@e=NA8dfL}lfAq7+ho5r9BdrH=WB9Q3G!q6JG;~`9C_3y=Pf?x zi06?H`6=cjtq1nWZ-R>3-4~y{_|)T;oO+Uo18DtNB)?yM<%Qetd3J*y$RMX0A;;?9 z-P?_OhoASeHMctTwO^tf^pO36^26?nPhWBzh=K=vTC$TcyJXYv|LKC&ru`g$Z*;s* zmt((q?9WDCyXpDu&jR1D{v*mkFU6Oj{DgM6tbVObeq(=r>X?16d+ckH(}= z@uR?Tu0@!p{%yiE`^hTd6ru20#=Va(F^-hqVp?=L`IqGzOsA=TiLgzma)Qp@;5-lQ zm^607uj+3F)t?_53`bh)3G18dJDmeuyd}8>4qqT{OnOKZk50Lw_Y86>6@QE z6#2pT>9G>aR|L5}f_yzzj^evD`Iq#AkG=K;Xpmpr$cEj3X+eaqYzwPpVL;0t=o11rMNGCk_TK#oSX^;P|8Nc_VkNk#m zhyH%jF(2p;83CW^`e;zj5qqwd{pzbfy<2iR#49e^kMDL-I==fk%2$0U|2=0Pvds$* zJ{*3Y9O(Q{)svv!)sG1|fJus*oL{~)y5hwzope(;4+-moc=e09?N9v30snoq zhVrP71oO*;@pS*a5HxrKeP(=bRwF&~t(^6N2%bZK^Oe7By5zij@i*SHCq4dMj^7{r z)j1Ca{0AOePttqme=gW!`!oOjItZ8PpK_m-t*64l&Oi6gd&|F8TH&b=fC_TT#H)XN z$C5LDa@t+{K92lgeLUvxt7k}GBh-8SIMd>*`W4>~Rv$h4i52d6K>3oZ_l4_zbih_e zRQ`4+<<65Fqyu|r_&;+-a03+_U*Tvy8PW&Z6>`HPfANJ(y&8uEZC*|-hdtp79{z7hwOG)Uhj zlsy?kXYG-`cYW@GTOYplkdHtgTmO1re7?JMl^-4X%*D)KSle>Yue)!&!FtHU1HX5@ ze4V2}KJ+Y8pBmvf;lvO z+0X^@7fl)auwGVUe#_7S-zHth!}nO|@y~wgo|nVk8RJfe`b-hdb=*lD(f5;;vmfoKZ}^F`Hh$=m7m&ob zQzX6ktA1x2cck~Djj5ZC_~rd2@Pj<{+v@-kJdJnn^72u~-TOoQ9mGj2@$SKMSPjZ= z6KcHZdUj~M5Z|#4*Iw(fXKOzOUn_TAAcE(R$9Dbws{eW7KKzaLAvs6~u|8wGD80}6 zZRU6}YVyN&&UB7Yej77%&`WwtuS@^*pa1-L&oz#O9#(J73liU76bt3_jLx8vzkK_pflr85b9BJQ{z) zPqIg8$wfNKZ-t|r-%5m_i|X%3O+M^NFr6V(9MlY*^_%ql?>$HT=Enzo<2fg%?>F@~ z-#%ooZya>aFT&vt_DBxsqx4U`-|0VF|DGWo_(1fOUvh@bTEO~s>!@2Q_Sy5C;WzmKt>Y!YTkS0+pwdRrfx!V$r<=Jy|| z-t_S1VY{>OrTqPBsT(FY|Mp9u4g3)+Zq|PffFDQ6e~eJ?ZOtKa!wF%)>*yaO?_TAR z1HS~mR<82j)IR(-o1Jlp<~fUM^9T2nkNw%auLbcCK8O?P0Yp@saisYee7rNsxE%t7mq;F`dRt=E|=Z+x;MNroNl3h?fp!!zd-(@ zgsR`MA#%5-+|@5UZr^JkTmG%ST;>0B@ip0p@AmK4|9)G@lw9#K($EH$8lv^4kU<^slkvaxR`T%%2>{ z?~k9`K(XN2@2OXx{z$G9&L?acE|MPk zHlE%AMDW~D+j8?AFD~wYzim7zf5`@KSi0vw?)V(?5l{BsNz_Z7{9A;Ir^z95-w8&+ zlRtR*KOB1HMZd(~R<80hPrX>V>WI^>Mn39Qa*&R+^SEWl(}>B3-btpjgo>xCp@Uq} z4U^k3^fsO*2l26n(#QAp#5glWKP3$w@l;vJ{!xB4`LJK}B*7lzEpO;xXPN!1#zXag zBZe-pbK#gtL$5mft#J?EV*lATc<8HhE_yGX9LVp-f4GntIP=1@&pd0FpRfBQ{A%l8 z`Cr&={p&aV;40x_Tv%TxF#ZV@XT!#&FrWk8Q`hWy;upIcUh2zHes$YbN=yH^@*j{N z);IYh9p&d1^ZogWKkjr4ALw6Ux=yHZr)TJF``if%1kdpgJ-W^7+a7Wy{zksW9pztn z%eLG6@Y2tQ%?ABM?nLLO65(9?i3;f@NAvw~p)x?O^4G`D+v}A}!fgdxU&=ppuT5`$ z=EWOMMS0lUCciGB>TB3IvnvV)&!;bcWZq96+jbxPZRIF`)AQQL?7R4L;g%EXOL9Pu z`U?JqkKpJ@{q}}=us_aJOg{9^FkK*2zfd=HkSjU}i;~+l^yn8fuj>usV=bnWBYi#5 z{^G=E4Bn124f-`dkl$}-yE!++_AKmi;j(3p7q^(!wAN{Yl?y5nVw-&%$) zuybM8q!HIi#%<3c@4}En`RpUz5H!p1J*074JhTcO?doS#V1E-TzWTtwveFIoJ7r{0*;<0`DKLp@l$5{%k~@EPrK^eEAQLq#OLk;KeQ{^i8S;OU%?9b zA|K;Ha}(!B<&T+s#EtejO2n%lY8pDL*9u@9JR5)HANzmnu&1`g-vRF#die7PUytOe z{q_Mpv`^IY^vD`I$Wg2aYTw1*N18Zh(C&)i19{rd(f*g>v0><7cboCD3JeXNqn6)w z!;AL1=oI{oc+q~v6wA$ZJV~6^w;%PS_bb&??PT{|j+4{hf6+dX^eq}bL3}K-`z7d) z%FM4DI`lh|mnFVAkl(jk`#4Wt^}F>>K5G5bWViM;x-2(WyW^vScI!Q0nBCg1&_0dq zE*L(rbChYjj{!TyKg0Z*DHjz_ZTZ8{Azm~dNWS8yW9ZPo_DmXjwHX(w5B2Q^zDRt= z!*>|}d4os4TQX_HU50dJ;^jZoj~?4EYF;#~KT~qkgf?a?;1n&!CU!q)(UhiPQV_4SjUJUHYU9PVy&|f5xD_`mRdy6DA+> z?eDHbzWP!1$MSc6u-qciNq&*}6+;L6^&N}kkC}Y5d)2#OgY}lBJq^M%%QZ}S=&SFh zq^HK^wxJ8`To^yI@0ZYSlScdOvHj$TSNnr~deHvT-uH0_i(6PD4ta=dDehG<_iy7Q7^JXuwdwedR@??e))Y} z|4}mewjC*sr{2$XCPN1~>X!s1r+bLg&!129=x@nw8-BL^D1IfkXXutCSMw$R{D?0% zcXr=@w%sJCx8#l*x@F1Le6e&`pKs`A&)#vv4{|ln(0oL4yM`{D$Ll*Op2KT0{lNK8 z{!4YNI1k2+MHQas&y<}$w?6*JYMSc>@i|}kVewL7Ipjyh%b3ZB9h%3~4t4TM%x@aH zDE~>0Y|y!lX}O;NdWK&ZFZ8$OHIkb?r(X|&z4J8xk-dsnL0^wiQ$DI5D<&U$Xn#QG zMx;m6(An`^=OoUY+GUHQwqG~gFG0Q7@Bg5;_)2f}vx3QUot-+jBR{5zS6cq`e}5}W zI^@F+?Z5Y^_jLbg=mNbKi4Ns3f2c9PW$1wKkWa_M=ZWun_>SuLyng+GPn`IqhaY1* z$$0oA@p%tlXFpQ%@M+@99)61b^O%PpC%$3ufnQ=Rlg7AICfx+_wm#rHJOOS-e_b#1 z?GN97z4y;-#{CXf;=_*4@Ciks*8AlQ3^E-XzueIqb2hGd5e2h1hwcUG3iRCMV zw{5cdkLHt)to15I>oDRr=<(NyO>^AT5!3(`7J>| zW=NMMo%J93G5a0_{YFVwkD!;1&`*2>wVo$EI_nSi3)Anv5qzWiDZMAybv5)8>5tNX zoR>o$>?jbAH0>h~bqv2=EWaQYW~>vW zFLd=*AS@Hs3EPC=gLq5ucc;{U_2{=L()sbG^^FSsZ0|{sZqQ5R1WTWAdVwaG$ILIE z?dn(gvKRU2pY;Bw^#H|f!|(~p&Xi-`6NCP1q4-Rha^SD`Dy<^h=Fm%AT$-iXqft}O$l2n;rHu+&aQ{QQSntOgA6Hk<#%>h3B_av=n$e!8!W#7l( zFTEF~KH2v}IG-!JwAL-eKWFIRha%Jd`$~`cRt!D-qkA$Ym|rvbuv_y?!7(XLhJTGl+S^GVmP+NA&4v$6DC=5Z=#?X>-$`Zej})2Uw@rC;VcE~YPb{x1+}o>gWV za?nrdccP~IDcV;jovkP6Jwg1k#zpYe?|G?w_G&jjANKyI-=`4$nAwL!9BRB!zoPN0 zbV)zX&`v5$+xI`rs~Uz5c4U}t5lXK0KjLw^|6spdVO%b}=_?yWy;o#O*OMNk|I3T7 zyM=G>3e?SM+>+a9>mpr;b8;xSAQy)yv*6@uPe7WPEQi1Ne4dA zPxArAdyjS$3?1a_Jx%hp&L&tRz1Ekt-YkEV%(#wq5Y1ag_H_MS!^neP8uv9Gs@}VX z4(%|0xwG5uKLbBXx(xH7H}D3rfyh_gOMyeSbi%+N<_i zB)4Sfp#Ml}u-^T8RJ+o?$#|V{Zums$ul*9WBfs6~o<-Hyl;LOFO`H2QipSIyeLK+( za!mW}rcHh$9({%QiieLAU-R%|tf!`j&lBJF@G;^i4Ib^XXVPewO}2x?mChdd0dc1% zoNsvbBmb+OY&q0tadg@B>9$)Av z|Icm@eE!=9Pu&WtAb)<3c(wEI_MUiO<;4xQLO%3Y{Upa+J!+gqzMepz8U0fBs(!n` zJj^dIK5w}52iFAU2cE!>izF8r`2I}wl_cL1VTG`15a4k4cC&t*4oQT(fhe^h^7Gx@eZ*Ek~iQ>@P{>57D7h92#$({}Sa z_|x{&8fSD)VZxMyUkfKJyI<1!hQ=B7ONndxc7%R7%%wFhsDABvBlti3@G;O)Q2VFa ze-_mIPU{ar+3*qGAGdU0r|2r4epUK+&DYY<=d@GaK+n8Bl-8zznRTW7!3B3|}8Z@K@`?~I(`>iPe=9?>KJ+14Yp zuay3r^VeM0)r+Jbwy&i5n(WYg-P(!x(!FYe!}e*$DG%i_?qrs8{?U6^mHCr|*01n; z^7GEVWvw4TAN75L+LwtR*pDa3*Y7?~%UQwgGmlcvG(ON5agbioydn;ns_UR$NxzeC~-Fx8QuaGz8!gj-S;^;oVxqMe$F?=wt>0S(dH@)?N zci#E0r*^HtPUP#}i_L%to+H0`;{%(_&xQ9AqW<*#a+iGd9f+fL|D*oocft4<`g&VA zXS3k0%YE*ScWiRuaY&-w6-Y1s`o3Y8`6$*%>!{VQ-ys^-WUv&DW35Bn)T-L)Uh%b2fHvK%};q$~-JbZ_7Su=R_7y9nE&Gwri-6&zx z(A)k(->-?Js)PN7z60w} zj{1u!qbK4|bkHlxuJjGg56F+|FR~^dai{NI^}VU=DjGV-6`ka&pAc-Z9_prCRDaPl z`C&Uh(dn!2MkRm3(AoZCHz*K1@89r|=6U(MOZXdn^j&G{M#pci{l(}>j^2KE8r5Hn zkgw$Fdry65DZR%GU07cu{rW(C$zOsKq@S(7=o-GTSKnXidr8Sp+|-vB$X_Hn=#Bm& z!~CM51HMWABOX3Se8t1}SU)unUnaik;bX+N4Icf4zUS<*Unnu&>x7er9&wN>IQtHT zLBaFy=l}Sff9!o&cyAW+HUHS#Wyjuo_}=xKcY7+luh5oP{$tOrmp$YyM@@np`I?`E zA5sUngU)>UwbPIIPx%M{=())6L3`FppTw3Li-`acmPvUR%H&Y&e z)$g$WMt+grA9?ls2VPy6d?Wb5E{(V00z-iN#3k!}b%UM9E=GP3C$W5Dus_P(?CdNN zsz0hQjdIqX;=AtpZ$A2!V}A3B@+EhFAcE%y&wlmRAKrEOx%fNmR}4S2kKkYU2=+{V zRDTx#azEbDF2+eeK`6ha4V~3ndVOZyGmrV?=U+Y_!mYm!aO%X8uRVA1mS?RujwJL} z94IZhNW%`bZ^0(zw+8f>IiKp7eAqL}^cbP+=@~j}kMu3w{GSg`Jbh-UueIkuC>T8N zDgCQ@(Yu!mk6lAf?iSWJVO0NV<%rK!ckgiZdOz4dyuZiFIoOGbW#|I=i$n+c=*JUZael}W3SVHk zyoayQKP3;JB);t7^NL3gKgRafFnILuY4&4z!VY1A^esbg>*H`J9y~|R+v*K}d+7QH z@wcrH7Ub|tX zU-rJ-=qX?Qzw)o#Wz+8+x9$0VL_X{tC%*|o)tCJ~(aH%g!U)Q)y2+iJ#((y#1$OgM8FOkNlE%IKL=uTl16O+y#hxp2ay5!Z3XZLB$9Uo6k^34@2e z{&(5wf&6~Fp9Dt+&rfz4`R_0P_Qcomx2=EW?{Ltn-@X2X?}XPhh4n>#6+*??uyJJx z7zfYz#hs%+zhw9S;BPBO`IR-!y`r?r#LCDI>)YrZ<>&aF&L6XlD@oFUFZ6GdZVf9I0t9^T@~3g-jCxnlC`63#V#;`j9JwQ+np^;mQ1KQDdy{-;I3KqvRkR zRgb*^yJpTy;`jFLhTh|(pCDBHqzxV9if)+PQA3Y;iSA*m4B}&Xrt2PljPl0~-i|97 z=66g!?ALfA*ibwey0D#i_cN-0i{IDxM_}i|j7ei$DKTz~9=^_gam3)EuYbQrWgx#F z?`Ol2!E@yacbvLia))o=Z`*$;|FzD${`>M#k3EL`u)fG|f>3cbY+TVdk-J}f*yB%p zZPyw1!YTifUtRUo^J}$!06AfO8@;3aT)N-+ZMJb`lyuTRrE-KCS89gNw#V~OFnGTF z;&;w$Y;oEI{zksW73FtUxbXJJu3PdxtyEx5j?+~cf;@h zbkyW>_}kW(^1rk7M>o6tLyv^}e5kJx@~aZ6zJ`q}9|7aw+5edbu6^wD2S0?rtsLdQ z@!_RkY`o>~;W{JgOL9Pu`U?Jqk6_|~ew;^*D=Cu?y*t!*ictMR&d@=w=pZagZq?AE zU(kL}Z4e(TF+J|#8;5>Fu83*Z{ufT5Fe{E-ShBW`YrK|0sW`nSE|fUn|#=>@kB62 zx}2edo&NiZ`nQsy3+!B2HEE11)) z58!X)Yg|$O>dD-CKX}(Z4tWl>+jzwi+pd1#Y1Nr^A;NZTu*|aK|0#@^97%yLZG- znfz*mbB&+zA$ojlf-@W|AbGI$G;Rle9dWe17`6ETB_!%~? ze3o*Ky>#z;zx%h94)od|w$i`OtfW=_;Y( zXTs1yuIPrzO+7pi57Y6J8N|nW zl-ZAs8@j;Gg_9>k_Q{q_U*Mt)dd4!Yp3 zUm-uNZ=-jVpA+A8{+MlCNs$hGp?`;brwBE!qrb%8R*v$o`ssszS^b1_!q-~Vm*jvR z^%eXJAHf#o0~y5WjB%x7@=;F}rt5_27p4pyUj(o&Vhy11p=NdnW zNBj0dj^g+xFbtD}#^oGBN{Q>HsNPcBP#m}&DZ}ipG_gZeda9W9alpN5{i-@0C+uAiVei9}hdbgv>M-krucr7 zC;z%B4?A@4srHFV1*d<@(7}$_V|}{&%5$X;sc+|cDR>LuDtaVY{Cc(GPrjmGbG6Ig zKbQLy$}D&3(I>9IFcqpX{U7x4?>T6Ye$yk{`_JV*g$dHvw|?iJ{QDH5?A7--Z@6>u zx0ZEJg6z)zuwNfi9PtqzbO{iG!|q8KG3CSWM7J6IUMJ4{F+y8!h#!4-t@s@>zD(bf zAbpSj-HV&qdlH0)4N>u(`;oJAwtEr^qyr!5r|Y z;(NlR5#MdnO%ZSX1YPjJzr~dY`wxAmu71ImL;s%?NN#d>k z)?ZEU9)OXxcz@?rj-M@u_|Q1EtbQmcGh<$+@lt-3AM;%|u1ij1z>a=9P`{$@cRPk| zS@QgT%$JvZ()z96&no^UFXz#zzpEYW%Bw%N_w_GJFaP^rU$3SouY9PJi35GKMb7Uz(2; z3?2McHfiWpqF?GBUcZ~sH25fgwM{ zqOW(99}^}YcIkJ&^}Vy?+4&6QiB9tJn)x+D7Zqpn|G1$;oK2cE z{4h#C#GmT>0r(j4NrR8lH)Han^qpiJ<_%qxzM8j<7&_=XX424WisRR~hp!OdHu#`? zY|^ALA1aWpN4)wE)RP{}hZ36)#+~ksQ2%Mm!5;rTS@iaP^}v7gn+pc{svKm4kLC#) zxAk3A_33{7SUwA=w9iNW)I3VV8y{=8OvlD~}BXZa!esNd7LpX2Xolnfu( zula$-YxPru>w$egt};ZP#wCr{lGicvtRGh!!bju2#@!b0w@Lo0Z$IK*_nHW5zScd& z(P=*A-@m0e^6x`|I)Q!*{QFHxMlSrNd4a|`#of4}3;R2!?Ysc^tmuB-wMBJ@vAtGx*rez9r=y(xBvT3{ycGvbc%-z?*W%x>W`2Q`HFkBAIWbU zK9JvK+TPO^#M_K{V&b>`xCms@2}Qi{(^+p-}?Si`&K_8fAtI>=#`vwe(>k@{=7OzI@Cv$zb44HXy~H+rT)8Y z=-{uqNkcDDOd9PaLBGbIarP;$puZl_X*ZVX?*$Qi;vv#m0x`KVaN^bILPVMVtLgg^7TMJ*(W$j zdeA_QzV8kXY6rM^>wPS~@!Jz$RldI8UI~ccdGYkkuipR2+}rSX*#8{t^vM6tLG246 zUr&@CBculn^pKnlSm<*v{d={e-@if~Nvz8@J^tF)i28mT_1?L6@cV1ENA(k$XT*N* z^oE=$JvDwIALCQeyDuhd%G>@>?Mr$V4ITKD?sNJDGQ-Djr|Q=<4vSCSeR?0!dz0jqJUYFn z<=*GYk00vb1R?B;(yK)J^pSnJ@VkF6Psfv|_p~0%ORt`xi;`D3%E{3@Pk#6B;mQ56 zuTR(>s9&2<@;)PKUmSBRhT@CoAM&-L{M|2pF# z<>52LXFYtJ_=1OTv3-qr_%iVo51$~uX7KplJ3+sv+5e3Zb_kn>9{!#reMT_ioND0j zd7>K@U#V_%ef!^AXGjM=kgxArV()k5bsnf_=+NKm9OLpKl(AatAJ6Y)QE6@Mh$IF{Ou6)h^wrBoF_qk@p@9%NLlC7$$J0Y{j$y%-GXLD6n~9Z!{(XU2L|Vv$rI=&Ld`Qr z$QN>=^wfP{$j3PD&ok?$JmO0Cmg#;o>Dlt=bkCT7ADNv;LLbGkpzb~M?;rE$S(z7| zz0ezawNG?u|NgO}N9W%!rha3#`DXDr$KStS%s`Q}w&^=-PePSg;hjyWJ=zD{4@XSBv%JZ}kcM9i>l)_BWUG<}l!J4fucklX=$l_2)Z3r0R>&8! zp|^i;mh^5Ix+p*Co~zmBt5b##fsZ_*FAiN^)&9`6U28se4TOK_3&lI`zw8Wpl6);q=%nmf0FU=W#aP&AKpL5`W<7x z+at`9zGUdb`n|>Jq5HVz+7IadD!+dH`Dw?Kr~9Q!l&kq^&(NVAXnuMyDmZv9SY_3d zR*nBLTzJJ-NOXoLEJ3R{bPAk4)K&?dc?ywW`14oYS5-@PRwubbolh8-CM0 zPuagaKdHX#d>8d4I^syq- ziC6pej{4C2H_808$%j3fCkQs_$DE;q-v0b|y8RitaQ14g3`CDj9l= z3))W__In;>Ly!Jfzf+=h>B}~0R{rqwOKyg<;76_J{;$91F=^z$Z;eBoUE05j@>^7# zXkEB;Sl=&E{w@5opC7h|LtR?y(2`g7=(KLDb!7eC#$12rW7z&`&pX%I_2g32%9hCb*AV$EF!f2Tz2!CGI}dtt?tgCDdWtaWjn zKd`@#1UjwbYCT(VWaka2C+*J*`s>D8Kh}P|)_K*x2=A|d`}_3qfA{?e{j{E|^>6iG zB|`^)SD5zKc_-2*Am7>gYt3id#tu85ReyTi@)zbFJomL7)t{<=PQ32? zG1vK1hV+h4|6J_<+Mnv&o%#>(i|SA7o;>y6et+6FbcnOA>^h@g-@uoNPyDx!59ChI zM~lo)59IgfqdG@(;ma%R@bjO({5|=z%znPaa&z@(Wk61U9@Y?_rF}iozBT_6%#p5b z_@F&%9;SXm`|Vvrhxtn)cHR#z`w*;f@3mdVQP#uPiO(B6`bmvj!^ZiNp||7w>P}?r zps_6;D!*&x@P52-oagxZzmD^5PmcDv*QA^ke|19h#L3g{LlSyuUGR;}f73ViTIFM# zZy$a?4LvkIW#&2m$d4os0qP_8r@up3AUzUR&YodzEOzjkjgvM$tP?JKhTk`N{51|n z{k|CLRpXMz3(?PYo}hhHzkm0~>%{ziT!j7m5iSlj{zz`l&;{|dNaG&NMSCkTziQ~h z_DQ>I1|P=L`<$Ev^UH+egiS*ay)-Ur+)+K*eiikk_9CeHipD?a8`b}&7I=O*(&?xD zTlK$rLudQn^}#rJ-n;tR_g?qgyMBwm5ntLD8e_S+_7_bf2li`UPy4O1-@czN%YNSfF`OeGnfTVY=nvd-TJE z!P|a(g85Se`Tc%;W9oDG*dCwWsd4cSkwm>{A2Pkj**({K$&(&@qU^PCX6+p_<)FXb z!$*m4ntbq8{0hdI-!^oJ3-$kMr<$L24PDs(FW0YMw966tE$iWXY+E6t}$A9iW@HPAOUwRL%Vyh1tcYsQapbed;(eg539 z)P8Q%JUj6J^!a7Yo1_=yL!S06N4@>e{PKN2qMkJWo`&52)bA<@>U@j#HPt?Z_kX|2 zpNEebxzJDhciNwoAG?MQ^&F2oef{4(8X;YV`LG-GDdO`UzDGZoJba7z@*sZR81Z8s zzRdV&7(D8`Wzu2$cO~Lz0A#{b&gN{^sf8-;P+}fmOgdBAbny5=buZj z+WdIE^NQZ~?~91sZhWT~wtDouzaj}ewLUXSKGH)x0HfNo&J&KY9O&@AQHu}07v#j3 z(E0)W_@qZa*Y}9Tiv2i7y=R!V>prNLqM?Jmlhk9Bc&iU=z+>x0=NDBkzdqo$=a*G4 zqHmD@wP#(upqGti7WfY7a?FRl zVf~vl{8=I0DDl=_=XDpyG4Gt<$XaecJ?gy~_W9=uMF*bf?^NGuz9(fjcIVtDjDCT> z^KJb`)oW@MXTRP{!5{Md`x`Q(lYF&vea|9$iiQq;EQ`N+p98)}J?n-Z{v9`I__sm2 z4)Ia`wehe0ENeG(#sm9RUNF9Dzulw1@#Ax12j|xe=~NE<0zbuc4qf##X6!`1&h;xl zb$UO}kl$I?wFl*onfyT3jP=I~^{5lJjQ)s=HrMYJ?~0R2Ll^jYVPdtu-SB(Xq~Xs3 z>GQ-}yJ0&X_$$SG8h%V)BbntJ=#(8=sUzWJ-mMB zzHRWRuSt^*`yrO^5pVqt+wfo<>goHe3!EQxZ^><&Z2qIDdrsO%Ie+MVAhWvj$6S9m zxJ3H7{%-IX>1X@hVA-L2OPq!7f7H9~9}yh(yTMbG=lm0#AKAj$tKSW7F+aJ6v)lSL zY$wDo>vx0EP8zEX##Ld;r4|2{FWO0$dI&E%=o!`jS9f#o2NTo>bnt`b7J|uhS?_EI zpo2WWzfY|>825gEFa7g|4sk!ibj9?8VSi7(#tc2;xM9-pXM=Pt;$=Vd)B`&8YwGWZ z%`;VAuxI3Mf*?B0& z4V`zaF@JJ^e=zPG%zBodyst<;1PpvKV?0d0aj@Q}$VdIL^t9_NsNa&xnRRFAseS1j z^Q)qxe8r_;k9O1zUD)pq8P{5d4&z#PFda+0$=b6ZmLvZZ@rn!UmvDV@H`hK@zat-a z{`|zw2fcM+%2K<2b@W+BFaH$D|Kl5^cUsncO}&)cKdX}drERwRfPY_;jrRieQaP&$ z=oD8qPk&2?de{4#V3+a>7dkr=YdOEwnQjw;586#-eP^%w$#Is?vYhoR>QDO@iuWAH zpT;MgJn%&vHCWz$KZ$;#Lpv!cZOx}s$(j8?IR5hc zD98!plkG(NL0XR~vpncvUzO=hv2QoljkNAQb)dty4q`s}HVq%hPi^hyrIN4pXRQZI ze$SMH{P>%lJqfNip*-Yk-Lgr&vRwBr6J}Tr^pIcA49eHKm)4mizii5d_A~uI|NiqJ zpXuML>Ydd0Blx$N?hVq%;>0J`?)L}ipL8Cp!SlRnlOOP#mXqbVPS_7QF{Vp{^szk8 ztCkHOaV|C6}{oZWnnsqK#^KbYwkhj1;&sg{5>3pot<7)k+ZRqU!)P7(b zJbSFWX#NYWPI&z+`VF0DO}xeVLGxNi?fyr71pmTEFhhDEVZY7;>in$i_s=D$ykM8- zF~J9R`{x(yo*ezYs?Lq-{9?<{1-xhIt8=4}gE&_Ej;}jd|C8jC_V8uma|VyNP&EZ}P@-egZwQJemh|LwdaXb1Cj zeiibg{FGX+?~kbZ$e4V{)%jGNV^w_=44w72J&%g^HcGnMAbqSy`m6m255MU9mSMkB z*&L*g>31sI25;j~zf(DB@~xa!VNxBU2@|SgLxPP&Mdrv9-AJ>gW$bZ&#BfhWJNdNffOWOvAbp{^j zD(%!kQFX{a${Z{Ai=0{w;7np_th|4Li z_v*c=N4?9W^Yv~LzwGs;{=Q%3L>Kp(A1!FS=`oEBaw7bveLvC1H+Fj8^O=wTMty_m zt^c%dq;jGGjEes{<9LMpK?gsSy!M%8{utq)ANuPhTJP0(U%JHk8GM8OZ$a~IgYAB< z`$CCL`t1bmD#LWf+ZXCmzoMZ>yBalV_-mYWRpPBZ&=n8rA^-o`u3F?j*LF2U`nk5N z)TYia!`hYFi|qLSZ7&tdbN&g|8F-(Q+Dn1?4MOWz_!Jz-(4>H7EP-Y#C= z`TIZWs=}~dx_@=}Y}(nce(!I+=Wd^$f_D7}_2|=UUHz7Cp7zD4b@lGw9RDi$i~fr7 z|NJ)U{_r~WDUyDiaL=N_6Sp(_xlO-V?ExlJo&P#&phe!q_gpf{;A}}oxiT{ueU1xnnrHWKP{B~!|vr# zKPf-<2Fu41TR1!HIve`E4(YPYhd(i|Oz~WW^eveDaDK~kz}jz*(i?u3KLqvt2IRml z)mPKwuk*HAUz1%OLkIo4OxydsfUgptcw4{zU{`ZRS8uW_ZStY7#!kTz^2r%G*xy;+ z@sVDN`;wup6_%YA4-PeR4{rlQRO*!yaTq{1rfAaGF_znIImGkxy{QKBC zq6_qos;4URyM``|Q{G=E`D#b;t@?JNo-!s4y>uU2(ZlOLwh@EJe4t{|sMj9rvqrq? z0shy6ey~w>aisA^W0Z$-i2EG-A?}u5SCQsQn(rrLPzKpa*``{*BI@fYlpKj_eY{P&~m)o$EKyklm4M~(ab`6hq-wC9`PPmP;`CCaG~LN7ahPQTZ2 zzF0SO=$G4r>DZJ>!%rEdx1DJZWZ?<>+5P|j`q?b`&(_aQ?;n$XuJ2tn($DtZ)u0`7 z?PrIrQ}ig$`6rmyZtVP{exc3$)H`ST6@D)gKWjhxW48`B&i!evQw%$wT=wXjloNG6 z8S(9(|D7cL_zE-i#(t5`ap>Ip)o(fG8!O+t-&OEK7*E`P&28t(t3Hvh2XU_UCRidp zXu|oIcTTo)YJc8i=SP~~$}bJW2lJ3N(?oerw-Z#m>6qggbT_+v!{+VVAy7 zE3@2O_c?1u4)oE!?TmXSO?wLBc+oUnARp~(l6>Mj_3cCZ(*A9W`N@I&zFoSn^4Q1U zzs`q_yZKGBOW%nVSZ=O%jT$+yOXo%6{C-J(E{yj33D_k%$cJ6y{a5e7HOhmJ!g)M@$3*k9 z5$3lDtzY5y9`VbXpCKMpPEhCNB)8!Geu}=2DD3L|r*fc2+-ThO&yU*gdC-39EN}NQ zgLsOyiFf>h?^KzdjF1N!Jg`Ied2ZU{IOeY}cTB#OGweR(_`3)6is?S&l)*!ezs{UB`9WRHm}hpWN5Rm+ zKV_~n>)ed$XVlPPysVit{1PX>mWOZgyl%(fp|8I$(>3|fL*GTWc)zjgd$x0$x_@@I zbDH@*`+kKyo$t!>{#M1|s87dpr&&VjHCr4GyC1ktK8nLhBM#Hz3;OpD`{zQ(Jvq96Soa;v?g>L@?XK|r zv+V1UF12^R{t$m-#AgjYs$CRJepI^{C7%&P7u7BlFI7W_cF{EHP%qZUgojTN-!*vX z>#s}3@_jp_^o@~E($GO)?dz!>Yh1`0I_O(6=|JE4IkwlThcEGbea+y*e&3|g?-%(U zK%02Q3F=P|#+U3vgX7EexqF^pv*qyKn&Z0aaol+M$HqJK3ZK3IdhkSkW*_IL@3G*1 zx353{g$)jTP5EW6hpo^2_*?GT>zw`W+7tQkSApe638(c*_Wd8&yGV2>7uGN7#|eRl zU)qD|dG>4){1jvUB;k~y2M;_L|8*~d))&+-71lWSm)1w3*ZC;Xr}uUGzjr};MXhCr z%tQXcy=dOLLXq@werIQ81o63`P#wIVa<=tA={ruokPW|0C~fvjfiG%(algLbf$vbC zq`||_8Iy)ztK^#}-s*4dPChsoe`+V%U$*6J{2jBR_V3#Ve1`ax!6Oc`CXG0#(2fG}(d{dk?|gkQ4&+z)-;V>;^P}`{ z_0FxYxctns!{s#iU-kSa7F_GCU;k|Bu9d@Uk>QVV>N7zoc~kZN_zr)FPX6eTKK0(d zKVWypq{H|pU7q-1c29Wo`}nR-{xG}M|NbzvG^nG`-gEoL?cdxD{ld7TJl(hVssF5f z&l`?-{Qbod0xxs`hh=#5+Dgd#2nqfe4;srdECOrlbD+JNzB^eV+Iz-7$Ki-2^>+_y{VF zT9nfnkQexe_r8j5(&R($I@7v;RsKm72I66n=pa07FU&6*I^fIXH{#(F#8(U+aaJ?w zuzk_qCh<{m7Sz|G?k+B_6z7#s?7Nw4gk3s!q4PCe@tdPRbq|8>L51BIr+j~A4($60 za&@jp`&N=$GIW8SL+erR7yf;izTAf42f6y5RQF*@?u4ORmRz03FM0PG`*KqU4ce>w zF4evyw_xaOeQACC^}l@OOx4%2^b*Z%^)PPa!5`D-<9H6Q#{90Ko0Htb`~7ER{U1E& z58b1z_9VF_LkGD!pCTwbb^dQUeU6i_wBm5oYu63KANFhiQuhvLNZ&PdXs_`@oc{j3 z$`#UOm=C!jJ@I)DKT5xrJbaJwSN8A~;>SFEocM-^PoL%d(DLw8T(_L?@Z-c!89e%% z_@TDGg72nDmm=Q!88+j=e7VB)cde5NMy;2DUi)E+_agbf_+wVDggcko)-}Ranf&f%tzyRm9ci9U)6h>Ursy$L8pGxx7X4Iyl0$OOCIL@ z>aWx1h(~$6pQX0-#%t<5LONgXI`LYkA9nt8{Qo%L`Zg=$rEON(>C;c|`9A20`GDqI zzo$Y+KYsSpl?OK43HfMW>BF79c|wgttuOTZiy+<>i4Nt^env@I#nPKWP8G`{urWAJrdq$$zf>QSyDx zKXdJm@}wWuAE}@5?U*()_yhH&^RR-$`k4mhp*-3}Vb#HYrp){fq4g{L9zW9Ax9omq zX1}iei`o3B_kj}SoYK7Mi&6c$f9`XP^qai2wj&lAJ9y+3*$UiXHKgBs8Lq6J>=B@gURO9Lx`GF4Y zs>!tdJ_GG%!qA}}OH5A@4jV5fZXeW3_m=6sZqSbT)9Zvcyd4_FVz*rWj`J2=^wK}@ zH^z(N`QlbUx_$okxnlzWt@?^_=t_ zgL+F}$b_60<>+^Q^*%RAJm{>P4S)!qt)9E*U!P6x_96TYKIx;KJv#TJ^R@Q-1j}b5 z6bzo7SA5TTTdnZ#@c#6me&&e}@{pE(N|%jZfzM~W7mZPmI$@I#<-_^7cRyXrUql01$r$K9rz;N6300EvxLIuSuXG4W5ky{e2w;%4IXhjX3~h;H0c_|N00Xl zmLJ{3eaEJDA~@H1=p^~i)?cZ<6D8+|$wk`~qxvgbr`hDLH_*W0& zKz*IybU)>N4^gK)ltsTkk{#^#N15Ly40umJ@Ox~rvv0P3U*A8=--1zo5BnkREBNK6 zg$IAYPU$09r9Pm8J>%YfMv?hVLX`tO)skurGn(^->7 zoTW%tAU-o3yx5AxN0ABr=}7wtmr=G$Qp5sPiN(|qwBmnD6b{6)X%3r`hi#@WpG&~cV~=}%ikzE^5}QSYH$(l2@K znXNU)l0s4MmB|k{e{6T*Q?L8)m7!mF4#KxXJONQ3k|n5lUH4P2UFm#pnetE$^)$K8 z;Jhx+{5qknC&-b{1huc??<353KmA}o?$JK9j^)3f{y)~f1l*CLYCCs^!LVs?jfxNi zG$3kF#JC4g2`YFM&?tx*hJlN+gn@w|qCo^Beo9o-$RZIHB8vuPi3kz|A&7hg6$$c* zaU}?9T+kpcf4`~sy*a7dxdETQADDCN)Ty&qb#+yBCuQi+ALdmy>sT0fioyqWz)xN3 zTOoeh^J(0hpXvLX>c7@rJKml`$L{^B+YUJMz8^mX|Bc28%F{mTzqbGGe`*hX_!!i~ z&iLWZZjHB+=Y2namFUn8cBj>j5O~;KFlE@?ru;JT)5Zb4zo+~coHY*k?VyJ)C&|-c3i12YBP5koXKrr9Da&mmp_&O_&uj2y1-EX~k&E`M(!f1MlIJPMF z?KJMHPrUEmjrRP`!6@4M!RQ7N;MQDl^=IyU#VQ}C8d-_NZ)FTgiQZ!}cL52J)#E0iWu>Ro9XEpDWzKSFCf!&&i?*l||buT{S z_6I)xqo?6-*fpd)t&51Ce-1!=_Cv$q`oF(k|FP{)ec)I48~4+!r+DLa(>gg ziRRgP;vJu{zKY``*I)PT1Fza+^!rnRf9J#p^e9VzlmpwR&a>N;)18pFblY;a? zWv!FQKk1KpnV3d zciFgtPUE=t;onIC{Io|gGJ}x|={4}5)B@bUY!?mw^ z_$=`a55M^P2L=!S^-LN5Yw$gcA@R1qKqp)n_p08$na)uuuWdW@Go4eqfj8C%cUg1m z_Z$02w(@DGQ7>$L6O_Oa2rBKnWNPbWFh2ma5mbABxms{hnj2A$R8d(`8H z_x>z%+`VtxS@qK6KI*a8D{k22x1ay{=yhN8C&>YQK(gfikUVCb_s~1X?^}~yByH-U zcc1!2iI*R9hAxo1N_3Emd?~WNX6S%#kzd2$5$CokBhD$(^@tDaC!;uDJ9!_{zD3x3 z7vLK|*4aPn{+9LDqcy)&T;(s=i@0f>T<4#D@Yjv+c-5BRKU zNAGW+yzk1F?{?|#52GIO6(5wt;u~E*8DG7(D}CdpeiUEorSlZBGi~Tb@g*JPB91xM zmkiw~zND)dJmOn7WyGOCx)$-%;=7QToF6ZaTOsG3A-~G^v+Vmdke@tm>=(!%Qf`KL z`3Lst!t;XO>(hKqaMrxdZzrCBVR5S){YLY)YbNu$$ofu*zOZMY`rVwJ;r0aYf&Z7| z;x({6PwUu8Vt<$34NDk-&k|pC}rZ~=zuyJwT z)I;wG%Lzh_iv>f6ej_@_MSfOT-!yc1LLdH<|&F?E8o zf7ZC@&$Bg;4m+0tKk2aejKcfllIGvaAH`+<{S*1Kf$Yw3ehqz)f0~zT-9hoJPPUIUR5t4? z$iD*dUDXGC1HG5L2RJbGkgIbCdTyAex8g83bv(~Ud!2jL^Mv%CKWW15$O6l?qsHx_ zcar#up@-i7ds=lk={t*ztbMYeq7SvmZTdaY}J42a-*%?9N?@4Wvl zJK}HTrN7QDIjA4Sm-@B|HU9REeO8Y<(J;6UeEWu}*WJ8V8-H6pJ`O~1eQ~3gb`RXR ze<1#b9&OKVUysxWoqy*Ebw01avg0#e=f4Yx;5vG*_k3{cD=!!=>%*QV>9g0lJkq(e z$@fFYeC~E^BF|fS^P3+&bK}u_-`1W_vi`V*4HJL6^5#uZgq%pp>6;*&rSCoD^RLH0 z?aCW|d*R2%ky;pd6x$B;AiAhzuVU(K)LCy)Dw&6i(L-!0mQ?zqkB&QDMb`p=yBs4V?e zmVZ@NTve`{{G1E=yWaB`EK#3|2Wu=h2!pnxOZXP?K*Ap}@B616QxCuASsu_I>d(m! zjr|eWyGnH6i*YT>`huYYK23fl58t8Rs~)~ge8aWsYc%XPV|F2lwAN?ZtM{hgn_q#v%qjN^*rjTcK%KHx+ z9{J(S)@#aP_|>YvV}q|e`1zY#s7L(TY~L5$)_p&w_N(!I$jX`H4Q0)*|8&J` zF8BrCuNtrCtf8E@UVG;)r(IO4Iz58@MbB>8D?L&lcK)3wlwS%gJ3eE3S5l7?-nYS( z^WDS0ta{nImU{f>*_GFyd%)>$K|T7N|b$`td z;%B=2(6}EzZS0>>UU42VAf4{3c7FhLnm1`)r}4D=*>V1XPV-02!?bP@``nlg@zeMx z*ylV_`+0(T4$}KmOqZ$8NB%h2_3YI=QR~4P2U8yz`vq~FXW5=l1-|%iXGhVaZ%|If z!s+~Shin8yKIz#^Q2WsS`zw);j^m8yr__d%>ueqBlO&z> zEBu}(e!267=m+}!qsm1tU(^r!EJN>6f4SJzryp`KY#tco-Qss<3YR!Kv`0R6*e-hd z*e>9E)H7l5!ML&HeT%fIhdv4N&k#x<`+X1GXEc7Vh9beW;gesNePrz!Jm(U;|G$mX zQ~tBRhc)sKe{ZTv`TD*`)98cyK!J3SfjEnwVB}*Hb}#xVHi?gP$v5TU3&dv)9)9xQ zJIR}R=%ME|!Flp28amin^uCj$yr>$wz|IX?ri}PC8Na@V*Y9Et4IcUqIseoBI`%(f zzd(;6{TTn+WS-6XPEL*V{yLQZdxiy1UY_krgv$S_PuFnzln9k?_Bkjl?$OJ}{Q&nv zKi{GspR~VC{(VB_Thh=W-$XYp-wK8v{ZilEDNW)dS(a-azDN6;1|QZhI}`Qe{`Oud z7F-A4`<3HYyymTo-wPbLVA-TdW_e}Pc>X8SGTuJ0d}t{C@M_%X|J%kTxh%5vA>!}`a- z)WeU>D;@tXq4cr&AC~X=tHyeT<@@|6C;gKkeTGo^UNCg%XQESl0@H8G8M;wkdiO2m#k`?I|0tR=;#Xi?Y97AFyl)sh z^zCgn*+1G7_2Y5xMEdU&#}4m#!vDQ^2Na=aPx1S-^Mm4U`w!x=NEfsV^Fx;HXZ4pH z=_G%l>GG#csQyy&=sK()5K2$mUu-`=83Kaq>-(gi{)KHf`X>Gk%g^e!#`z0>B(8Sl z0p%+{V`q-@WR#zz17G+f_<_taZv%uedUYNv3QY@D}e4FxX29J3A-#KiWdMl^< z?Xg|Rs~XFLN%}~ic0@ljwlAz7BuqW*RsIWh$Tw~1!uo;YoilXk2PIP;=}Y_T9zH>Q z)8L_Rf7N6^=$QJE9@jd5R0Y{T2P`9aHh;9v{@mjpy8qnQel(7H@JWBi@kxDlvcK3o zM1F`4?clHA|IsB_WP2dP^0I8|A-6@jJwoMW-OwTa`u*V|*Tumf{%n(OFi9VoXF2-0 z$@u$umN50uCrSSP`n$bfSbu7L{qfgtwbxa@K5013?t#&J6t|Z1cZu?4cg^Sne-}vy zzG43E8+z-f;UqrNVmV$N`vd;V5uY;nuzr#?_0U88LoiJ~c|$j{)4N|3nU^I)hkjBw zW#|=U{5l?fp6z=EKk6sXnCvG*QxARh9<*SR^RgE2KRw=G`s`n^&yW2CJF4u5TG!M% zTFTJDj)Ex%cC6@rmHpGh55MH_br0V@&*57hzIwL9cRhTZ_<_L(dPJgUS^ZZ=s%N?O z3E~5vEV;1m(e?I?wVtPWs%?jUkePRUFXchxU0%8Cn?L^jm;49JQD3IKSFqvAt)9BY zm)`f{(Ke9nN4HR$Km7itC_kuFVq*t#m#zY_B_v-(g?+R_AyBTvz0rvAwXbLq2ih#otMG|3ZH2^2zf8TJH@z$AY+Z_?=Fjm6)Hq z{^?)5@RcWkBkFT+b^58lU0b>S!M)!Y9X*#oFP#&pQ7`$`>J{j^s(9Ndt1mSf4y4tkM{hH=7Cz5cJ?kkcbz}i#$oCDx8zm~9pc(x+5XPpDBi?(4Sg!I zYVlk}iGJx5MoBj?^rQa7^>m$Qkl(WFT)bqD|NWT8kH+=jqjM2jFW3Aw|Ak4r^?k0k z*75lqYwxFsv-*Uf*7s9yAIrsj!v7vk$CIb;a_RegvTtbU0)MX5d6dLQ#{A*u_<2tM z3?cjhe4Xuc29NuWKc6U=dMn4CD+#;5)=j%Gf0S9@GIXOj@cycNQe1k54)>*KZ5$Wa zQ=&a751%GJGl^djmHh^f@w8yd=-2bizcTTGElV!++r{_h_&XHZf7t1B>sx-C5k2Wz z{`Y>ay#q_{e-B|^^v^hQ zJ;pq11N@@>uaakncmg8sk|n793je*i2IZmMX#C!3^8Qg`eV5SJCw9KGZ`S*1L+^W- zIu9LoU&6TG*xT{l1d0XM55N4?x1RptfBzbPBVVhOtMNzo$K37XerWk@hK9j)=CeL@ z_LpiWjs6buZccoFfZt@FVB|~Ve8;$<-`7%o%+y1#9`(|ACOcDxE|9xQbdZaFG|&2? zp##22er1D4f2o-=@?wE>P2$7nAHh1kH!sutV_F=_oY%aR2ESn2Lu;>n$7x4FZ}?aH zG~WXvxW4=4&Yk-ox5?;~0{j*C-Y=IN(86DdFFXHc2sJOuvkW@OksdFj9v|Fh-`l?M zsV}}?_0r>JAcE`O-`@G3mv`^G9)Bawl7n)%DPm6PI)5(6U_m|{#ZM;L&$>!>Cg`LW>{V@ zc-U1m>g5|c-`4AdDG4dJ%w_<@Xy~oY0bs=-|x#go&o#Z%hu;^JN@LXU43v4&$CPR zNRK?_mwY`~mK@ppH0trhi*Ao@cho)is$S#A3Do2KFKyg9{lI68o+q_3&$-dPj+uUkio~`6N2J z?7wd?_`B`r^{A!+=ZX1Cr4y^a0wu>9LEz2M|C_k|vI-1#FN zmj2Gk(I0$&YyN&>aPEcrR0t)n^p(l+R&?MCyBnnM5(1BS_e~jgXH>p)dAt2{jOwS; z?AG}62<`etecR1WxI6I~=wa=C7wg~g-3{(P;;DnfUH!_H(dOj3isYak`LIBJ%Y^bv zon^;od~Whzl=F;TF5G{`<9_)A)oUDlH|y^${rbcQ=eC(gec-P-$w4_FSu&4GeQlh7 z81MY|U^Av3dJm*8@$zHd&>@dS2f2u6iS>0u2Yj3Sng)+JcT5>^PLr-reAu`KI;}71 zdlB+0^w0%5jZ-N;M{6BJG=QMf{HZyEPU{L?(q*`A==0Ng!-BW2=+o(WzCt>E2im98 zI?IrB)8uM>B>omR9vAtYBg+r@q4Sr5iLbl-$PyL^tAs7WK4Glk=+lJYkG#?M%Jm+R z{B7SC09_~N#s!U&TF3F%jijHT*5{J%bL|CnPBgy1!?T-2w7yi}_t&8(^4~u%8og}X zKcJs}?^yF`ofpj;x>3HfTwXD54}6b)seANI;#&qE=o67XdDeGLeOP}Un0n~jSn1-u zs3+I$W8WC-74)|aQl<<&^FMX|${9TR<$@`X`UmMs#LK_%r!L%g{O_9TIYi^4ZHMty z?~#u_@DVWjKL1!gPp2|hG!MP=Mc41LJBo<6|9-pl zK|SQ8zUll_z03JS>jU$|J3eE5p9w^8J^P#;4*AS8pZPNU9r$fdd{mbHC?k$qn-Y{i znv~O?khgT*xohg7cUA59oFo54FQ16}D$zj?#68LSc|!+$f&B6wK1zJi;E^X4Q%0UN z8Lv9=VdFRQr0>1Qv)q0J?9@1}aYf@reCXl@yGC)`$CWj%Xx-H23+ObCtAC5men(`v zcxnAw;|}B_&-~xnC|@y-1LW$yP^F%d+cb2DLziX$9C}`KSC09DK23bw!^enEdHB)~ zou9G>k9g)y8S(5fjz!{?udr7a;#u{+bEWx$`k8Hq{+im;>Hi~EeCJ&oe&VzjJoiuF zY3E(fXZ`s%-uC2IY<2a!Tz&BU5l^1vpdNni$&Ra>9L*0BEIU49J?^BOtK)CFBmcyU z|E_w?yI#oppM3ty&)V$VEBmNNe_xanlmn6_^RD`YyruK5rm2VC3oMrj<;Sj}3*@d6 z9rQr_hpbODC-Wjhe9GVv=d39s&JFr2PkdOvg?>8ss^4wb{XN&8?1zN|UAaQ2{%X&g zg!wD`?lB+qC;xnJe?sqI93g-GKCI4JM87rRhn4!h^XR!_{_tCpbn}z+krw4F7(DLN z{(ex&)Wbj1euvi1YXZ58`b_)%*q-4FJ)0~K4IcXV=VD`5kL`wk`8XGFa95S>lZFm@ z7df9*zA4UGLl@-D1_e`wURC<3>fwj?IX~AY@hjTIw+tS3=({b^U%GbPiTV{Qw4d}s z+VS1h@7>{Rw--m-&&c0)-nEN;+u5&u2a=CKSiYr54+4xk+V|dx4R8M1c`v);?H7%X zUytS)-1mMl>$kn+t>w$#amcGsgdTDJ9&MF;m5(GJfiOLqMi0cJMn3wzS&d%{zaQr> z`iK7zn)h0sqO6C;gz`pPlFL%1W=Cp$n6j1##Ya6;SdG#-l-jf%9u6sW;XfwKE-e7w|+kp=G(0Ibffz$>A)A`U7q!2LkIkTdR9GriTH+x&k^7D@O{R;=i!UQ4?TR8 z_*iRfAN1+5A0<6}f%uGv&k~>W@Dbt*29I+o8LsOUId1g`(;T15h8}s|Bz>On(e~rk z1>y1a-$NRD@(OI%r991364#IY1idmBI{p>XOD{W5LH_#lkm$1}`P9iLPpEOfV&oxz zga1dDV6*Pz0~y3^rTp48?GVof%R>*pz;f)nV|@aBm&{X=rryfw{bfRaq_Cyqlb@uI z3~6uC;33DKe^g9;Sbxp1zHaCc2Y>#d__Ylk<{tx7hF>zYKYqj5e&9RIhvX!FMUD83 z!NU%nAILF}bEZDbjsfQ<1w%I)&sVs07>%nsM_Ms-u%kIyj`U0!^N7kXTwDgkD_>mp zxPOtC(f{&&@Z^nSe?f1pr~2=M+wX^iPS4?bzSg{?^vF1mMtxNlV^J}fSvQ`~30 zzpVCxEh7)l)p75;czQ3pA0i)eqc=G}EcabA#7Fuic`k5q-SGXBah$fEYv1d~yjb7) z(Z1L}x8CH&kL>rQ^N^{?)1`%PY*{Qr!9``q#r0bGS=Z3=aIEdYn_4Fjyq2~{9as;(LoqwCdEAESU%9FiX7ZzQ^ zv!hNqI)AA+M%!aM&>xa4H-0;gFYsmZoA>DR#4mXGH1Q=5KVY1y9==R`!{9OA$}X*U zw@p3#DSHKbrXKN|w%#4NWo$Rb*@P*>-aPfm8a(=W&Xm!Q3jcC`DiAL{5EotOpLOpX zgz`vvY1^TnXuokYK9IlUo`u)`dB?(Ny&LsfZ#s$%pM1d1Z+g;pPgxC_u)9lrhJ=!5 zp9=$fR*4SnV0Zlc&Mz54;9>W?DZ}nM`7RJ2whlBJm%Q`j+W((sxAxV)wGAXkB6r{Q zz!$m~{rn^N8+LanZ#y7@>o=#&?|J@;XO4yw*garYF;HgI;*x;y6{GaX(Gp>in1^)HqdSS#o60_SEC*6D}(3`{wtI zz9Sm=eNKE(jk4@RISBpKa~nO%84w1vixg?B)3aGkXMwpV_BzYSlGzhPJYcIOwZD~q4~?h)(~9ooUJ z65G`Yfrnj9Q-)nBmOF&g>?;44zi)Zjiy%1?x$L{IKH{A9&o~8tBi`wbvrFf$|FqTR z^)0@fJQ?+{JIDIv<~x?p6VNcYj{Nsu6ZP*Ldjac!j=zx#19R1FURAtzU!{>?+pt-s|5a=xa@c=`WpFP`r}hB z2pf+ZPnsN$JEYHT;_S6DV0U~|`r(a}{^*cC^`kK!c4ti)c1Kvw6I%W<2KNd7+^e4R zr;Rh3?>&J=UUm5!wun6N;CsLm`LFrj(G-}xsCDWOPfdQu)d%b7-uzN>P>;N7Q{O(J z#;NF!$M!;w^w^wwJZsYjT2I(4zT{l-G1O!Cr~GTT*S_&>i~F3C1GxdolKFXMLf+DS ziJGa0-t#OM2<69?p+kQV9poa;J=RC>9NPzclK8m6BhD#PMx3kkQZGI4>go~QkGmJoDWXPNb$kotsRgZg%jJ)?Z|&L5Uk{}bmQhI6C_#wq`I zvZnoRyw(Nu9#)S0zzF^>vh2@mYK9K>CRuJ0T7Bdj*x`RSUwN#2x9yP6I4WIJ1&C~x_@!=0bCh{+Fm-A1CQ1Y^8kDrf`f1*P>*qtYRnGks7 zS=E$b_ki{`h!4-RV136sr>lN2%kJB0_xk-e`ri9*-(tym`9IO_9iMRYH!e#Ybr$qQ z{QYyml7o8qCEj&@NfXL1IhGxtvH$O&9<7si|J&~(!`)P`aqTbEqqI%z>fhw{*bw!B zzvd(d<$z?#c+#7Yw{$!in0n}4W4T2rKgRAJj}wTe=pYyIOtC&^=tlWXJ_`nqIG0Qr zaqcs|RpP_rJbu4i_rJo~POqbH-{5C-AygV&=ns*YcmE@Q#fxqo(L>)M?|=UL;;EmG z?T5Y*ma~MG55c z>)X(;MtRlPSiezz5#Kg?0KQ!j8JhCQ9?qj<|L6Eli(}V2C#8NdEsm)@9lzVi zaQ)raTyW#&%1xX zjRTsGJlgNrMt|)Qdp=t6$#{VYMf7w&(@woQ3xi?|n_ zH+i3^vVK6w?lBStzbAXnAIp8mcJ#ca_Yn?p{B^(j%l2oS8+N~{KVedj66L7>TRo5` z!zVgD{QFgp?VvF9ZLmBfw0uTJkxujP!gJQ&`thS95#@4AFqv+BJU z-FvsI&yh~;Ko9+j#4oqs2EJ);-A?@}%s&`svs~}e{qnLS+t=Q7!qXSOE3fhIHYgHY z7e@cMdG6W6E%Engy!xfnJ3%OUc7JO$Ua=nS5SI+g3kHw=TQp_Z-J#tT;=}uIFy4E1 zFRqt|{GOS$`|Wh}y?;LQ#xJf;{S^A4Uh9$ip3qO;z47V?_I~xK2)l>WC;lsEzvS6{ zMA$7l*_|eRo)CE0T`*&# z(nr7`Tz|OlhVR|_|&<_2s$@-q51AajJ z2OhpmeDt?YZ}36BCQKRm8Yf+v_^J8o<$>a?e2`xt2mMfabr=xA75~+XOv}~pOu~qh7R!*9rQrl%B*h~I^cV>uVwIvTi28kw}RqD{Is~GzdhNnG|o?p zo7PRP;7$Bzr(g8yKkT@^1ij&J-B<3S!?sxeyYo)`$J*mi4}awP&VNNh$!niA`J5&? zw1eGM(zghKhus}hhTTb)`-I_k2j2zb`kbDp^ZPr!KK;b4Kj*K{VLns%wVR)4-#Br< zqu=Z=r*5S=7j(h}`X%50A^nltU40%7ohzR}AN;*!T+#e({=?2Mv8OqCHJ00iXpi|p zX)AC3M0pKDD-V8)96Rl|s<$P0YC zWFD(?*R*5N?!<$W_6^A=>NpY>kSwDadZBOm^6vOF~Su>6YsY3v8+ z9p&%tBnhRD&98vZl75r@>!e-!{TBVMkMgHr@dg!Y; zoM4)HTcDhtp@-h>Dd+AZe;NA;dZ$b|(0fJu>8?KK;j_dqc=&eQ(U%N9;2Wu$GUhv3 z(lv+=Y+7>JbvB)A(>hyWqht2gJyi`c@9I2%a-P^HfAw1{2XR?=w$s;NXUqO|>=)=8 zXE{%3`HbbST=Lz`+-k>X=KAVxPVXxDPn)Ov^X@k3JGcDkX3W#AUeH_LZ7FZP{JNj! z_=1|BC%2`4KIr;;@}aR`;O_zRRC0&ZXP$Jz!$;7kO#H0%RXx8b?)ts*-+bZuU-#n< zzS@_HUg!KcZGBU11$Ay9_P0s9{Br<3>YXN?Z(u$EAR^R7$ zgV8?7*TvtL?wWS!--@$;E@5cskngd-J3H<74Kd#6{o*F+)1-r3_*d_tEZWEKxT0QH znEnOB$LgOp`81N{-q2yZEKimr4O2$`3>e22 z@wJfkIpjh8Ta)X#k&TWY?Pto*HV?2~o8fo9KDaR=6Nzm9*vFz65&0?!8%Z4f`r?xJV6o-1eBt@ZiSRzK^XbGL8z73g8@ z-idbaa>&>A_})=_joxp9-SNo#NBNW{)bp@iX96Gj_ipm}^VQGZ<*mEkx{)vE#jM|T z#k)`4{~yO~kNUtLbCQE{K(b_B*rI&Y2mN))^LNM8L+=vHHA4AmVCWDp(Sa}G6`P~I zgu>_8E^F|JW8Rbz$3Ej%Bz{^P{r9k!+wUFeb%o0_dwv#peV40e^nhMNQ-)p*mSZcN zeGCK4Tf8uyl)d+EmFLs)t8u8)>ke}H?eBXJ9eUude?t**C{mt&k4*gR``?Iz=+F*! zRoSjZ2t4fSm@@3jvfL*O_xIBIRe7z`d)E9)^N7Ss=eORfopM@ZfKIqV_kT#g&lg|$ zM$9{`zoED02levg{bIzB{{(HO&JX54>h5a|K8H3a4^0urjQ4(8iS=DVU!T|p&c5a6 zSHXVXe|i4+7T!2FYj5(u$9?YfUqMeh{yad1*6wuZE}QN6ksV$A%9TY=p7Id&$ge8( zZW1cLx-2_B1+mzYrbxqF*#v-!*i=4{2}T;L%?q8;8GB%Ni{-w-!|tIe!|r*OV~=zG2)BE@Ppp2ged1~T-rpzA zlK;Y;yLKPV^G1>M?|jv@zx{9aiMuH`j!oMqPI>3->Xg?dv~h%=;!)?H<@SX!-f2Bb z-%XRBrk#WI{Zycw2WlU9<)iUajr6;J>Ro&PH-1XKXn8;7z30&mjA%1y3 z1>@y^IbXYn0`GYH*4cx8fA*5|)GuNEOP}+XgHJ4f>Jas#HudTgYQ8qPe=(k~>3x?E ze(1U7fA03zCG)kHQqI%w``SUTzIdzA@3jT}Yff??Hy~Lu9u_tpk2_)WwUVhv|4*?z zPpJ7?&CsF$iw<%}{h#%HLkE16<)Oi2T!?Kl)(iPwrJs_-hmQ-vc}(wolFs!^8xM8f zX)P2Dt~d8P4_tN8LucS`*jtf2eqXXb@AA`rcNXKS_#BFc!L`#D{^yj9e{ygReEgFaQ1(@PQov_iKDP74p;fP&Kb17GAt zne`1r2YiS8S{{CZ_^!btj|QfUJQ^~8qEB%4Ov|ID_q!jOk0~zdKh6*1-?4fXEB4sp z!pg7idi9N}*L+gnLAd|^!|vVT#cLC;e&tI4cU2_^_3&eX`c?=RPPXVe4P`QpR$H-6knq!;<&*2ilH0D zmvl9QM;x1`j5uaU*C9SUj!U2OT8F#wYSwd}_NStoJAXXdb@VjpXRV{_cPF$ihv~oVMRsr98A9tpjg2xemO*`WB($4Ej-jAb$DhykLHJyIV)pexvqbrhPx9=+VzV z(fM)O_fvZQ^C{`4eLqF}ZCdx0KJ{H(d|@B*sYgEcykn5pi~D(H(np_U^M3rj;LX4& zxIVC3>Bfi7ZE{`}eCLS!jv2Poyw_2?e-TIdTQG0rp#Nx{Ti>~m9sYZOb;&tuynYQk zw69lYeaG;Je63FlCRpD$bkHNkeLcz7I(78PW4{FbaD$X7TR-Z%%ejgAu^%_5V|GgZ z<(e0K@Y}nfi2T#~eVOeZtsm=CrZ^)8-K9n*FP&c`dyQOSVmMkDO+G$?(VgPW#9DJ&Oy98}y5}-nYB#(0A^dZ1-sW z)irX$@)Ld6DP-$#8W5zq3`ACJwN#)Yv@MfJJf;}S-_lxwkllw*ecewF08h3tBJ17CUN#d73hdtJ>^bGgi=4tmi z@fR$SKjcBbruTkAZa=4AeTshVN1>lxuh9Lhd6?sS%yXarAw4TW2VAgQ<6)ZPMw#@E z!u=cAuw=Z|`I-5rkMjz4^}X+IBv@Z0ls_cDM*OVrU}U}TSm}F?nonB37;p3)D?OKd zth`&fc;q`q&!wo>I^FYV=+)=_{0~3>>_LjYN`hy)`@}ST*Pvl=?YH9CSG?ew$3F*ugHN077oW#@PTv2%s`S~pK1mltv?*`l2_iB$puhv)D098)CT@fqjk zVL$}e0S|6`+yjrl>wocgFpkcNkIK?tW%*ZS#Z_hHCCYO_zt!)93HGSZz=M%zIX}e+ zgSPHsIY9^{{GsoZiY{g9;rAB#>wOjV*Rr7t>|G@~@WuVK&iam_1HMXrJrAEEe(2%* z%%9kn&Mxt<5ufz%Y2q^;e!za0^YCTj3kDz96DgZA#@8Xow;J)`&vU`~1~0!B`}vgj zftC0B!LZ<}KJe>LKl0AE{04v9e!3kH!FBgR=`SDstMl*2--u6iE9aLaq2$F+8$V|t zKB7ZA#34)i0wM6QyJX6+yGwhk#80z3ew}xp-qzh$HQp+}AP07(c)sCgR_wU{C426C z=^wtOdaXxn&H8Kp`SZ%Q`>q?kev7)nbwaII3=JLP zDLTkSJmXtCdozT>=h<%F;1TBqQ%0OSjBknfX>rba>y7fO{7*MQd<1dUdhlCDm`LQW zpGs|CJ?EYximxbbrd>=hl_!QSYzoxLeS;9*zBlwnts{By*I+qHBZ zrg)s|KQq^1c#gJ0{?qo8{BwIP($D&?MqH-T8Ht!tC85o`3ru+{I0RXNh+lpkCOCiNeP3c$ew5F0e%Aib@X}N7`^9njlc6W_NB!>xAcE_RryTas z+3(8#5`T}zzipjeNkYkM^1L1BkUvq@qdXe_SS}bm@~33Vqw$Y+SBVeHpTJjtI~9zB zOR%?_v#XosIQ#|&b3B)u-^-Qf`MsIk-mcu@zDkPE5uKAl5Lch%zIcV_dGmaZsJ++KSGhj9aD*$@ zj&!hHa4@>g!ND;OW{-8Sv);jZ_N&D4t{gqV!8~D==TqlDK>AZ09GvQ4yzF4*qYkE+ zKiRWgIeCtQ)tZBu^Brt|$-%}~SiZo)+Jz1#E+V|x!RSw&pW>Iea_mwEhhKBB@(l-@ zmpfR#(!oO0!8m{4B66cESHI_A`X&cUw>Vh*zJvWAI5@b?!RYM{_6UnVbmhX29L(M6 zVEZQyw(fGUemCoX>fro6EI+})#Q!-Mz1P7WVUFLQiSoNAb;8tB9bN604p#MD5W?(l z9X`@`a7dW?ohx?;TYQhF!1qg<54rjp&$Cw_cIDnb*pBBa+dOC3;yJbY3tWA9&h`7m z3I~UTnGHA|@ccxA=LWLeA1`qKG`6$jljgo%hx;yZuG{yxZlBaTFV`hs2mqliNE#JoMSK(%1js)4vA|_^l$bpza&T9(B;@o2{q@pMZ9B70Ku6 z_0ykx>&NdOi4W>Gs1Yx^5AOA!W7s4Zm&fZXdY`A|(StTW;v!QV^PQ;OtQ zGkizuDc*Oi#IHTYj!J*hjxQbd&NoX(@bl-tiRU?ggw4aOJ*~rCeuUY*oIM5dhYpbM zue*w0m2}om*6&&ml>M>^5c1VdaNx~HOX@1hWW%>X&KayRu z^sG`o=peW8oXPo>u-JFI?(Z#M#fAu>NE7LF@1Gr}Tz==%@RW zpq_8Kl&|x|k(AR%dM9=c?|(_sSvl}q(>u2-JE!@%<9*LY`cLzV@+V$#dWqiZ0ee*z z9C&v5zcVF1@twlsp?>F&yW;;?{k%Xq^7A~us~~>Tr!qw!`Ju%7>a=l1d8GHdP z+3`p3t%cDAx-B_3G^Bos7dgLW3Bh~RPrdUs;#(k{>;*makX^cOgxLi>)K0MD%e_8) zd>BrVD?jPHs`M0p>8Ej8Eps#!HX^Q`>am~*wz5g9a z={YUW+mpz^%y=^LHmr^w5e z<~j7Od+))_(pP@<=OwEGfM|CUK-`HjXeZ~t?-{2TQzZ$C+ThK+Zi?`}Kkw^{tF-n@Pm|LT))f`s+R*sOOWur*C!2b4lzq&Q4$7w$~qJ-?VXA{?_k0i(a|{F6Zx> zw@y=~UT6n@554<@__spzUrvr6SATqMPl;Ee+he`d`6XQdp^u)^1f`Fj*Rrp3{+#x_ z)|{eOf$bDO$Q#+Q>6Cm4IR^(j^c<`GscClT{wS#XWbE}$f5}fz>33<;`TF|rH_pnN zg~vEfCcSl)S^OJQ=6zxP8vZVNc|41M+IybRxG`-Wk@n_yv-tNPgMVzl^7jJ}PhF3t zU&XSM`B0rQ??{u*&xe?IK5CY|NpD^+e};`Ch*#g64~RZ&UIzN=lz2_!pZ3N<@t@XT zGv4^g+J0ynWUHeFn=tk zuW}2}jzfiw+<6S~wRB;272d${lMwXKGwIDkHLkTtXYI0j&YB;oonZWplldN>GVjZf zPVJ;;c9%!*PuNxW`nUWP=6}$~z28Y%jvju{bBMoh<;OwKdxE;J`S;nxn>_zanO9^< zXZ^EWURb)|@2UCT@Z?v$_es^?x>Mw?jyZn8TS$0MDp0um$t;5JaDbiWHY(Mk&hi1twd2*ZHJVSEpA#&j#|M%{f z^AG6#-w9Wqgq^bqY+SOQr}>fM*`1R2xi>q1T0f2S_4>K&3+v|-{g%J4Cwkwn>aT*+ z`fZnbN&n`Q{Ef_q>pz?_Z;eiwPir2k`u$QQ3l=H2MkqbY-hEJc(GJlQc{hBF^Ub(NFaBY9 z3jY4@56|j{*~d6vi%;3dpVrTEQ|9l}=%b!Lm($<&OMhM1<~7C-<)5JP(7&G+_L&@i zb5r_dm302NQrmiRzM*)9osUDj65jg5a`wUw<)fhHXa0I>cFOpc-*;*Mfgat*I1ev- z{c}0JZJhl3y!BsLoTjah#rKzBQw)&{|MMEM>NbOXK@ z<*&=y_#;kQClu89qVrwz?{N90^Ib)jAqV>VzxOA5YoxRCY@W{=_tZ`>_Rh&X?@r0{ zH0jh%dS+wc_n~R)|HUcu=V|LI{_ok$ilgR>{_~L4JNSD^KT>@B{gL?olm794??rLR zkj|H*`=_Ahcm8>-?38mV^$@bJ$amVj-v7M>>C+F<2mY*18Lz|UkG8-0_e<#x2>oTZVCh|x zek)IlJL%L8{A?Wk`2p&6L9XH_IPE?$^ze-C_!m9?(tql_XG(sCJ%@vTbV^*p z?#IX%jZcC)Pv<{}*1hK@={=th&yTYA+_#(`ZGO)>r>MLZoHkB%sh9G`|4zE}kE{;Y zKld1)i`$REUc|}&UbFNGyU&B(|8DUt`o@mo_vdNPiMhv^m;QHhrO&iHZhQSu^waju zqEntP!^Ri*$NxU8_)pWP>8%?qM?aCDdpW;~UgH$<4E;%YDL5@Zi)$wD2Se}sj^bY< zos|Q7{qHL3J{qJb4wV&eeBUn9PugZc82T$6So-*&NkWTH?PjlY$iu4S7 z{#fq5V)+JtFVQo$c2dvgl>17WbUr_gmx7w#`R9=Pp5GPMatPm1oV@XSxp5Qp^~XSO z^Vpv!!~eSAFXgY`w0T74kV!vQz4*!A1=3kRLjU*_`f2^v|BlLX{;~Nn>)eU-5=x~Gr-9TNGu6QU3NJn!wxi$3iA6wvp){VUN= z8-L^8{BgOs!0zjqY=TL?&pjZ_@crc$VR}awj|IXW;rt66zC<`AO!7U)9ATX>pK|mS z!WLnACx>qn*7)97T<>4-eWDa$i!jaiYZeHrgc-iq(j@E?#$W2>MEJf!k+4pfPC3FdVVviv8iYNVUqiPMZ!8^n)_c1gjwz%4G0r&r9TKugbl(TVT}6{8Nv=>gzNq(!ZKl# zuuoXzdUc&J!S&%PVViJBSl~KkjWCsSdgci$ge}4WVS?*rJ;EH4Xhb|m^oURSxgd>-Q{ud}C!epAyfD`}}Jg zgwyLgFHC=*UiN?<`X`QYew`;2UUEwwKK|iw{q;MvjY;~&IM{v?$eokk zHa^f_&u4-{JQQ z>K=V}T0S$LT|*DMWsjgAr~X%+ebM!k_USwQNe`dm_pf~W54)e>7R{OzIs;eAD@*@8R`5o5dFv0Pn zOBiMUs1mjb^USvjVT*7;n4$j)ggNS2CTtS+3FAgD^s_$4^_0N}`ab+*r*1@0zk9LY zk?Yp3UbC?Jpu^Yhwr=&2YZlfnel{+Gd4j%Q*CW51KJ<~-o&EUyDPRY_Pa$7H@jqn! zk!y}U?5HF6S%1V4tJfX2_L%W)Xv8;ObpA{e{_yUHH@~6!f{ky)h=ig3Bp7V3mL*L;4(IqH7feie*qQ!Q- zN%>303$>dDBk!B^gHI=U8W-ZECqAO@TNOOKz8@uiqStqye0-AoCO%%@NAmId{*8~< zcV&Ehlk1B?)W^!}fF7)>b&4W{hALQtL#03wp_YN2N28isp3fAB*rF7JK3-XHV%$EWl| zy&vV%>pdQyzuw#M@n!C#`FNd2_whO>ZSjbQ%7PldlsAfp{H*aSbMmA=b*{SL;dM?} z{K;qWJg|?~d0ii`^Rzy`&+*I0>)fD^*SS6)uk(98Ugz$7yw1P*c%5JK@j9pG<8@xl z$LrjdkJtGcAFp#RK3?ZMe7w$E_;{VG@bNl7;p4SW@8h)}@8h-q?c=rI?Blgx?BliH z=i{}nXYt7MHz4tXOR&Ouah=5<|BfRg&2~&hw!aQM-utHcT zZ1cX~BODUOcz;V0W(aeHL&6xx|0H3CFh^J*jB|V}5mpHk93Rt!^Mnh8CBiCUgRo85 zBODUOI1VHU%Y-$;CSixLPZ;@-8&~3lDZ(sap0G$*A*>U&2)l#>!sscEZ-OvQI8V4h zSR$+vHVE5j1z*-V^aha0%*nDGyq`=Do+SUU%?o*B-L= z=v|LJcAX;|{fp-@$%}u)$$QHSj(_*2@r!Q(0s4{d+kzeLqbHv2?vK3}I2hyiwMu-y zy29`Oc6qKR%kLO~FYK77yaFNRP2C?jCfFbd9?jPtc}(!I4&vZ~{@KHvAA02T$#1;q zy!V{3M;Y~joDF(>-qiY&@LIPEY+SrxujWaDsj~A+|41iC^jYH3IM8E*Jl6qLzw-h6 zZ!gC2z>|JG>e9h_ZJvBIkF2tM2NiCzEWT)m-y7)|`6x#}I+2$fXno4I3;ur8_9YEJ z*jM(xLvjB`dtM4%aKS#m9(dT7As^XSWLfrAS+;t@o`#W+a^I8@S3NJpB z!M>sQ9f6ZJ-d9T*Bm4Y%*_R+6*_UHk_7z#SdcvNHk&klQlwqHqFKoNz?CTXK^RsXG z!M-^6!^Cgpt1f#GHsC`1{CeOKzsSd&pJZQ}W!aZwS$xqB_7sR$xo*m^PwSz!-D9z@ zZTP{y#!K8dBz{l-(COPjHZIub*8>mxdgLSf;{W69m3?WJ#TV^h-#qaumrZ#z?r?v` zwtFo0)eXN<{F0OQo%X!{)6%(%pH~mPU|)-TWZ#fw*%$w~v)Aeg`%=Wqz6Dc;ecETU z?H-GLWy25l4YrxIFM9i?qkA6YBYu88@UX8&KC-XNvg{kOZ1seFu}_TqKgwBC9@*#Z zqe0$dv2VffgMCr&duPx7pEaZ3_yk|r=hp)d`%2^^`QOFUiklxVzYM;J-@KQnf2tjjK^-pSsb3E~@-+TQ=XcqaXIXZYShjwIT~*@2 z2jz|_KN`FI`1ob;gw$+|1L`BY(w}m6%B~#CzFh_4!3TEL zO&R@9>sOkmgAVrUcbWv%|MJI9_P@3#SMnb#gk1Qi=Do*r?x)|Nt+J7S{Cc#5e|pqI z{>goM(mzF(r5D=49~I(NZkuvI`#0^+2`ZoEhyP#p|Nr6xJK)EJ=g0DKdwmpjxR7Ul zJ@D{jpZ3d-wKFIE*kalDW0!dFfnQ^vaqUn>o@pI-ak3EL;a@$^2`bNqUY@1MPjaV0 z$bPLdgBiZ?A z?R&Iz&;x$Rd*jWe`ArT%9WMC6uLmA}NKt?Jq0X}W&}Lb2Ks)%MXY58f{<*OqkO$g# zv+dv?J?9E44=U>?$D6d_2m6M6{ujSD?DhTQp$jh9=hp)d`{v0<_LW(deRY<_7wuqA z%g9H0Xv(m!!SfHc-D9yYULE@j_C=pMd4J#Y%_r-pXh-(>^|CKTKC*9tW!YC|+3E>< zYDPZFT~mgAI$veiF<_s{f{I`1_{sPUJ-L!E2>oIAV2eq+SMPJ&O{l|#xcc?LBd)Q} zJO9bTn_6em(H8yGMN$@9a5~@m^rrx4T3<_`vR_DZ}okq9V8i<6Q3=5_Y+s z)8u+ZRnPT&zRmG@FU{wn1fLJ0oWJ%6o1Cw8Ip0X|{+ZzYBgt_!%JHI4*khh|nO7b9 zp>6C4@-`CVx@6bj1N$C+nlmpVC_C32bwuItwK##b+u^}d^_vbmW_%Dhh|}WwZu4B{ z=a-e&|LKtn-~0`*gWt9#UqPLts&G9>=W%rYM(1jDj;6%(m^wdG=Q?MK>)blu(&G4_ z^9C*6-+NqlDe$?e$aReNMs7UOKCJdd=eKnD4BKnpQu~V~&L1n3ALI9YwXdgrygcc& zPp5skHuE~k_n#Z&GfxP2Ax;DOGxi1NSKtvRjVpqBo_y0`M;^PDn+J%C_6_pqx%Tb& zUFTo*&Xoo6c>?|jEi}GtN8x?DN4R=r41ME6UJw6Z{ce zg1SGvDD|S3JU^9w{)=AX>hUkyM{8p{gLB=HA>{upyBD~j#K&HL{H-598rTtjE=Rod0Y2cjae?^SZf-n#*Y2BqUo=7es>q%WUnbp|@4W8G zE6_N&Z2Ju9Zo2yLi*5Tl+qDVrz4p3&wT5Tgm)L&i@9e#`ZQp0R=$D|@|H=;Qfe-A7B)&54=hko0hg^K_-FV-7#0zng-!g1>;I^?Xt>5y*s}1F> z(0(Jz@JBU-&ibit^n#w+KSX=$7ws2HUWx5mgk6O<7r3H)WeIwcTC5)SJ7UE}8I)`gwuv4yazaV^}}0oafpEE_}hwTQ0&wE1UK^vD?-Pxx$@FU`){Z*9V|7-}IjZ2R8Y`?f)in5K1 z_D3Zz#dZb4GU2SaR6TipQ?_wQY_)zgUKcmKX&{-1i~JJ(sK+cWxFzAjc}G<8lJq!MdSRneksu}D<0`?B$?JP z3AWpOi$=!!B}2U0(5@AF-wtKiUkstMekmKh(68crPC$F>7wyMNUY_l0giXR(erfyi zE)Mrg`B>Kvk9gtDua->fmo(eG{P;Ki#`+~kyxPDH^ds#9qYV2iA#~O+HKP~&qJ3So zw|>z+uH+Tju1VM-oaL9ECogqLxL*(f+UGRoJdW*e9Ijm!T&wdug~|n!CDuS-5}uBPA1l z(YU|Bc0c{!9sV6Q?svZG+MmDu`_8xR%WPLC{QHk~`KTH9SG9?c@xJrB8&67az?azI zw?6B|6Mll<^*#v7pi6ws*=6ah-&3q-`-t|ZQMP{9ezbIqvR#%iPdLl(1y5efl;Ky| zJ*3??T=eT#Tf2LtxAwqp?Q=tK*cbo$@^&X#4|?QVn(GEATf4PCExRLZmm$m%&a!*K zlh-um!0yH8iT0aZzP#dhKc47^%C|1t9kR==-w(^T=x^P33)XJA$tKjNiI1J@)6)eqDUO z4`t+iEribYhX(7}esSLrWg8dm6G~p0?b?Jr!dY<{c=9rrhxdng)%m5=cwi!*lWd=7 zyLB%(@3Yn~CE}$g?OLJzNt9uKGlb6irET=W_^ka#w6}iI{-Wg7*se!7B%I}!=oMo> zKwi$2ZN4^Z&M)Wec1}_MdXa1YlP!P$D%-xwc1^-7@BZ4QCSO-| zi7%Y*+8=n~apetC@P_l}koDpTJjMy_n~E-V-Pfd#gl$pq5Vsgk=OMQI-BoJ*0X&?`;I7EziXdSey^}y zhpT|G<_d-%Uty{V2$nRBAL#oqr^Z3fyG#2n$DDA)K}Q|_`gLoMUcdIp zH7ATJgS=T>Uygsv*}d`BFTV2ouU*&;1o)1OazOhoD*Mo<*L(3koywwD{F0Azd98Ku z1?p2J6usK(yH1;-BDjPX1P=O(pPo-8Z%DpAz4+;SQkr+QNuRuWoFCRd%5(7-UqN4= z9={tR`ZD?Y^ePYdyzduF)KHm!vz4!`>zv{IPqO$0+-=6f3 z@=xE}dO8>dSDbW3k6wokn*2RM@y${1x<{}2I-gr)zwm;PY2&5)@GO6-UiS}`qt`e) z(}X^M%}YfuJp@HB|LMJU9k#5JuTQW1)OX6{uLaV#r|47TezW-b(AP)n)xQ48YbWC? zK25&gC3}Py^!Yd5_gE@AFXFep6HuX z_~+j`slVt2#b5r^IRw@B$v1v|cs?{%I{s>}c7o!sa`gz;-_?JF7Zknf^?jh{qawJ9 z)T8d{qx-YYwMw5X>AD{M){b59{V%7#%4OOc{qCf_dywA$u0@*hO?&ifNw4p;$i6P` zTMHh&>h&E-*)O~x*xLC_ac`%;@}W(>KE2A?msLIqFDU*hXZSv^zPly7py;J<#OsgA z8=N0=grZk}(t4TN52=6IqhFNAbHb7X%NRKUybN{zSj$ z^!MpiuCTvIf8hniU;ap);q+I$)8xNED0;QmKJ25_U*A#P3XFnFeA*s=**E;aq&`*B z4L$np9lMCm(}{1Feox*sIX;|0dYu>1cv59P=L~)De75AfW@S^4=ejJPGnxh;w3~X) z=a|EeT>F;wYxiD!89va*KGzM%XZL+y@u#D2+Tn#zSI>r#$lx_7L$3CjGB=Oy13t&| z?;d_`fpmdxi&sEDH&1-YWUg!mMp{L*<+DF3;92p>D|(>g(sbm~8X;vY?i^KZ@I zuXTm)GW_j0t#ySg=_`Z-Lg}OZXY03dz6=-hFv{oZh3}8^#r6{qKUX20@Ao3{^+`T+ z^DMU}@sT?HW%Cqr7xO7JPkf1x{+&y+T=nn? zmKz>E%5vMo59pVk!Q1@Py3mmI$~!^mWAB4n7wVF4><7*+pI-Mdtqb+p9}{esVLRnh zk?&J@ev2&d{D+61YqGtcCpF?b9{)~w|DTK8=JfaTM|ooN8~LMr@bStA4?mYDe_zim z@kK(#J;idx;BCCLZdPZ#{4VInOY3HF(zm>J^1sg6`1&XQ*ZHSp?jz{u_gr~I@ZTeg z{k+6;`SYX~U+s_k_!z(Q>fz@qZ14N4NPK;g|6HEsmcd(pX&tT0dihCE{!&@%dK&+P z7ZknbU0T;mlmCD)al7-I=+z&z&e&&u4j7MlkN%lx7+hM{Yt#P)wksKWyD&C^Hg-de{V^1hH@yN*Zy zVkj0|T9?!Pr=k1KPbSBU(njIWCwbEO`K{+u8$ZNV&!;|K&!-kYj`u$o?+bkQI+_1X;^Q8^MtsWPt-adk$g*B}BdB;OzS@V#k#B)8Z}=l# z@`LXm`N7A_4<3GQK)yCVk+)sqqxVeup+$Vc;H|ydhgj};4EpOmEl;0_<^_HpRw>Wd zvqXGjiay%6XtQ2^7xewFeT6jX=Lvfrf2|8^UnN_kH%u zYZ~(DefRF?J>U7x_nh2)Y4pUu+_&&N_boineGAWX-Qsz!TO1#< zzw7&13O)y-{UL!|IKB_Lbo@5t+VK(OOWIwKl;B%)xfLu7f3%Ok7o98oM?-F{pUfX{e7wlYVd)Xg}Vpn^gdD7U)=ky`+ z(SF7k93L|1*>=ddOTp)+9NRv|6$_-ZT|}u@^f|vWZdt?bF7lP8d>IEk$JSm?;WpaFYJFsgBd#0{@zCXnHWQO&7iTgn1 z^j}Ct^20ic`fqW+xpDfhR6FAPM^oIt`>3b)zwP&T*ZM&`b7a!R-(BRN7+&%{M?J*& zhn~Ao<6MU6PnEN$dY;kvnc~G3fD g6l=t53*#?2ZzvD?JX#?RH2SLk8GTnQjlQ_{7PNsC-~a#s literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8b45614 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean @@ -0,0 +1,848 @@ +import CoreReader.Logic +import CoreReader.Agency + +namespace CoreReader.Evidence +open CoreReader.Logic +open CoreReader.Agency + +/- An observation records the outcome of a specified test on the represented world. -/ +structure Record (W : Type) where + test : W → Bool + observed : Bool +/- Compatible worlds reproduce the actual contents of every recorded observation. -/ +def Compatible {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (w : W) : Prop := + ∀ r, r ∈ records → r.test w = r.observed +/- Inferential support requires the same claim in every evidence-compatible world. -/ +def Supports {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (claim : Claim W) : Prop := + ∀ w, Compatible records w → claim w +/- Articulation identifies concepts, premises, reason contents and an application limit. -/ +structure Articulation (W : Type) where + concepts : List String + assumptions : Theory W + reasons : List (Claim W) + limits : Claim W +/- Nonempty identifiable concepts and reasons are procedural articulation requirements. -/ +def Articulated {W : Type} (a : Articulation W) : Prop := + a.concepts ≠ [] ∧ a.reasons ≠ [] +/- This application model interprets an adopted option through its actual outcomes and stated goals/constraints. -/ +structure ValuePosition (W : Type) where + Position : Type + Outcome : Type + adopted : Position + selected : W → Position + outcome : W → Position → Outcome + objective : Outcome → Prop + constraints : W → Position → Prop + starting : Theory W + reasons : List (W → Position → Prop) + limits : Claim W + relevantCriticism : Claim W + response : W → Option String +/- The adopted position's claim is derived from the same selected option used by the outcome interpretation. -/ +def ValuePosition.commitment {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Claim W := + fun w => v.selected w = v.adopted +/- Assessed consequences concern this adopted option's actual outcome, objective and constraints. -/ +def ValuePosition.consequence {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Claim W := + fun w => v.objective (v.outcome w v.adopted) ∧ v.constraints w v.adopted +/- Articulated reasons specialize the actual option-indexed premises to the adopted option. -/ +def ValuePosition.activeReasons {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : List (Claim W) := + v.reasons.map (fun reason w => reason w v.adopted) +/- A joint witness excludes inconsistent starts and impossible adoption states. -/ +def JointAdoption {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Prop := + ∃ w, Models v.starting w ∧ v.limits w ∧ v.commitment w ∧ + ∀ reason, reason ∈ v.reasons → reason w v.adopted +/- This declared option/outcome adapter checks joint reasons for an assessed consequence; it is not a necessary deductive form for all value justification. -/ +def ValueProcedure {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Prop := + v.reasons ≠ [] ∧ JointAdoption v ∧ + (∀ w, Models v.starting w → v.limits w → + (∀ reason, reason ∈ v.reasons → reason w v.adopted) → v.consequence w) ∧ + (∀ w, v.limits w → v.relevantCriticism w → ∃ answer, v.response w = some answer ∧ answer ≠ "") +/- A facet carries its specific contents; several different facets can have the same conclusion. -/ +inductive Facet (W : Type) where + | empirical (records : List (Record W)) (scope conclusion uncertainty : Claim W) + | inferential (assumptions : Theory W) (conclusion : Claim W) + | value (position : ValuePosition W) +/- The claim referred to by each assessment facet is explicit. -/ +def Facet.claim {W : Type} : Facet W → Claim W + | .empirical _ _ p _ => p + | .inferential _ p => p + | .value v => v.commitment +/- These disclosed semantic adapters implement selected nature-specific checks; passing them does not establish all real empirical or value adequacy. -/ +def FacetDischarged {W : Type} : Facet W → Prop + | .empirical records scope p uncertainty => + (∃ w, Compatible records w ∧ scope w) ∧ + Supports records (fun w => scope w → p w) ∧ Supports records uncertainty + | .inferential assumptions p => Satisfiable assumptions ∧ Entails assumptions p + | .value v => ValueProcedure v +/- This model's semantic adapter identifies the actual assumptions, reason content and limit of a facet. -/ +def FacetArticulated {W : Type} (a : Articulation W) : Facet W → Prop + | .empirical records scope _ _ => + a.assumptions = singleton (Compatible records) ∧ a.reasons = [Compatible records] ∧ a.limits = scope + | .inferential assumptions _ => + a.assumptions = assumptions ∧ a.reasons = [Models assumptions] ∧ a.limits = (fun _ => True) + | .value v => a.assumptions = v.starting ∧ a.reasons = v.activeReasons ∧ a.limits = v.limits +/- A canonical articulation exposes this adapter; the source does not mandate this particular representation of grounds. -/ +def canonicalArticulation {W : Type} : Facet W → Articulation W + | .empirical records scope _ _ => + ⟨["recorded test outcomes", "observation conditions"], singleton (Compatible records), [Compatible records], scope⟩ + | .inferential assumptions _ => + ⟨["stated assumptions", "semantic consequence"], assumptions, [Models assumptions], fun _ => True⟩ + | .value v => + ⟨["adopted position", "reasons and consequences"], v.starting, v.activeReasons, v.limits⟩ +/- Canonical articulation is connected to the very facet whose grounds it identifies. -/ +theorem canonicalFacetArticulated {W : Type} (f : Facet W) : + FacetArticulated (canonicalArticulation f) f := by + cases f <;> exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ +/- A discharged facet has nonempty canonical reason articulation, including the value procedure's reason requirement. -/ +theorem canonicalArticulated {W : Type} (f : Facet W) (h : FacetDischarged f) : + Articulated (canonicalArticulation f) := by + cases f with + | empirical records scope p uncertainty => simp [Articulated, canonicalArticulation] + | inferential assumptions p => simp [Articulated, canonicalArticulation] + | value v => + refine ⟨by simp [canonicalArticulation], ?_⟩ + simpa [canonicalArticulation, ValuePosition.activeReasons] using h.1 +/- This model of the Grounds obligation binds each actual facet to its claim and articulation. Its disclosed FacetDischarged adapters do not replace all source-level assessment responsibilities or prove real adequacy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Grounds {W : Type} (claim : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := + facets ≠ [] ∧ (∀ facet, actualApplicable facet → facet ∈ facets) ∧ + ∀ facet, facet ∈ facets → facet.claim = claim ∧ Articulated (articulations facet) ∧ + FacetArticulated (articulations facet) facet ∧ FacetDischarged facet +/- The achievement obligation requires grounds for this very claim, without making observation a universal prerequisite. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +def AchievementAccountability {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := + Grounds achievement articulations actualApplicable facets +/- The concrete achievement claim refers to each transition's own before/after states. -/ +def transitionAchievement : Claim TransitionCase := + fun transition => Expanded (transitionBefore transition) (transitionAfter transition) +/- This observation inspects an actually constructed successor and its output under that transition's input condition. -/ +def transitionPerformanceRecord : Record TransitionCase := + ⟨fun transition => (transitionAfter transition).constructed.any + (fun operation => operation == .successor && decide (operation.run (transitionInput transition) = 1)), true⟩ +/- The positive report test reads its asserted operation, input and output; it does not verify their presence in the after-state. -/ +def transitionReportRecord : Record TransitionCase := + ⟨fun transition => + let report := transitionAnnouncement transition + report.reportedNewOperation == .successor && report.input == 0 && report.expectedOutput == 1, true⟩ +/- Only the genuine extension matches the operation/performance observation in this two-transition model. -/ +theorem transitionPerformanceCompatible : + ∀ transition, Compatible [transitionPerformanceRecord] transition ↔ transition = .extend := by + intro transition + constructor + · intro h + have observed := h transitionPerformanceRecord (List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl) + cases transition + · cases observed + · rfl + · intro h; cases h + intro record hr; have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr; subst record + rfl +/- A compatible performance observation establishes the same transition's report content and hence its represented expansion. -/ +theorem transitionSupported : Supports [transitionPerformanceRecord] transitionAchievement := by + intro transition compatible + have h := (transitionPerformanceCompatible transition).1 compatible + subst transition + have reportTrue : (transitionAnnouncement .extend).claim := by + simp [transitionAnnouncement, transitionAfter, transitionInput, + Announcement.claim, GeneratingSystem.report, generatingSystem, extendedState, baseState, Operation.run] + exact announcementClaimImpliesExpansion _ reportTrue +/- The actual scope is the shared input-zero condition, with no probabilistic inference introduced. -/ +def transitionFacet : Facet TransitionCase := + .empirical [transitionPerformanceRecord] (fun transition => transitionInput transition = 0) + transitionAchievement (fun _ => True) +/- The empirical assessment has a real compatible witness and supports this scoped achievement. -/ +theorem transitionFacetDischarged : FacetDischarged transitionFacet := by + refine ⟨⟨.extend, (transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro transition compatible _; exact transitionSupported transition compatible + · intro _ _; trivial +/- Every applicable facet of this specified achievement has matching articulation and actual discharged evidence. -/ +theorem transitionAccountable : + AchievementAccountability transitionAchievement canonicalArticulation + (fun facet => facet = transitionFacet) [transitionFacet] := by + refine ⟨by simp, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro facet hf; subst facet; exact List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl + · intro facet hf; have hf' := List.mem_singleton.mp hf; subst facet + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated _ transitionFacetDischarged, + canonicalFacetArticulated _, transitionFacetDischarged⟩ +/- Both actual transitions issue the same positive report about their own identified state pair. -/ +theorem transitionReportCompatible (transition : TransitionCase) : + Compatible [transitionReportRecord] transition := by + intro record hr; have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr; subst record + rfl +/- Inflation is a concrete report-compatible counterworld, so the positive report alone does not support the same achievement claim. -/ +theorem transitionReportDoesNotSupport : + Compatible [transitionReportRecord] .inflate ∧ ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate ∧ + ¬ Supports [transitionReportRecord] transitionAchievement := by + have noExpansion : ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate := by + simp [transitionAchievement, transitionBefore, transitionAfter, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + exact ⟨transitionReportCompatible _, noExpansion, fun h => noExpansion (h _ (transitionReportCompatible _))⟩ +/- These concrete obligations, positive evidence and negative report case all refer to the same state-pair and input semantics. -/ +def ConcreteAchievementExample : Prop := + AchievementAccountability transitionAchievement canonicalArticulation + (fun facet => facet = transitionFacet) [transitionFacet] ∧ + Compatible [transitionPerformanceRecord] .extend ∧ + Supports [transitionPerformanceRecord] transitionAchievement ∧ transitionAchievement .extend ∧ + (Compatible [transitionReportRecord] .inflate ∧ ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate ∧ + ¬ Supports [transitionReportRecord] transitionAchievement) ∧ + (∀ transition, (transitionAnnouncement transition).before = transitionBefore transition ∧ + (transitionAnnouncement transition).after = transitionAfter transition ∧ + (transitionAnnouncement transition).input = transitionInput transition ∧ transitionInput transition = 0) +/- The concrete example jointly inhabits accountability, evidence compatibility, actual gain, and the report-only countermodel. -/ +theorem concreteAchievementExample : ConcreteAchievementExample := by + refine ⟨transitionAccountable, (transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl, transitionSupported, + transitionSupported .extend ((transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl), + transitionReportDoesNotSupport, ?_⟩ + intro transition; exact ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl⟩ +/- Semantic evidence yields truth only at a world that actually satisfies those evidence conditions. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem achievementNeedsSupport {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (records : List (Record W)) + (actual : W) (reliableHere : Compatible records actual) (support : Supports records achievement) : + achievement actual ∧ ConcreteAchievementExample := + ⟨support actual reliableHere, concreteAchievementExample⟩ +/- Weakening a conclusion preserves support; this makes no claim about weakening the evidence. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem supportWeakening {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p q : Claim W) + (support : Supports records p) (weaker : ∀ w, p w → q w) : Supports records q := + fun w hw => weaker w (support w hw) +/- Discarding the only informative observation loses support for the unchanged switch claim. -/ +theorem evidenceWeakeningCanLoseSupport : + Supports ([⟨id, true⟩] : List (Record Bool)) (fun w => w = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports ([] : List (Record Bool)) (fun w => w = true) := by + refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w hw; exact hw ⟨id,true⟩ (by simp) + · intro h; have bad := h false (by intro r hr; cases hr); cases bad +/- Restricting the quantified application domain preserves a supported universal conclusion. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem scopeRestriction {W X : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p : W → X → Prop) + (wide narrow : X → Prop) (included : ∀ x, narrow x → wide x) + (support : Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, wide x → p w x)) : + Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, narrow x → p w x) := + fun w hw x hx => support w hw x (included x hx) +/- Actual applicability, rather than an optional classifier label, determines facet responsibility. -/ +def Duties {W : Type} (applicable : Facet W → Prop) : Prop := + ∀ f, applicable f → FacetDischarged f +def LabeledDuties {W : Type} (_labels : List String) (applicable : Facet W → Prop) : Prop := + Duties applicable +/- Combining applicable facets requires both sets of substantive duties. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem assessmentUnion {W : Type} (a b : Facet W → Prop) : + Duties (fun f => a f ∨ b f) ↔ Duties a ∧ Duties b := by + constructor + · intro h; exact ⟨fun f hf => h f (Or.inl hf), fun f hf => h f (Or.inr hf)⟩ + · rintro ⟨ha,hb⟩ f (hf|hf); exact ha f hf; exact hb f hf +/- Omitting or changing labels does not remove an applicable duty. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem labelsCannotWaive {W : Type} (xs ys : List String) (a : Facet W → Prop) : + LabeledDuties xs a ↔ LabeledDuties ys a := Iff.rfl +/- The observed switch is the outcome itself, not a record identifier. -/ +def switchRecord : Record Bool := ⟨id, true⟩ +theorem switchCompatible (w : Bool) : Compatible [switchRecord] w ↔ w = true := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h switchRecord (by simp) + · intro hw r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; exact hw +theorem switchSupported : Supports [switchRecord] (fun w : Bool => w = true) := + fun w hw => (switchCompatible w).1 hw +/- The candidate action has specific benefit and cost outcomes; its inactive alternative has neither. -/ +def optionBenefit (selected : Bool) : Nat := if selected then 4 else 0 +def optionCost (selected : Bool) : Nat := if selected then 3 else 0 +/- The report describes each option's actual cost and benefit; it does not itself assert which option ought to be selected. -/ +def optionReport (selected : Bool) : Prop := + optionCost selected ≤ 3 ∧ optionBenefit selected = (if selected then 4 else 0) +/- The on position connects its own selected option to that option's benefit/cost outcome. -/ +def switchPosition : ValuePosition Bool where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := id + outcome := fun _ option => (optionBenefit option, optionCost option) + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun _ option => optionCost option ≤ 3 + starting := singleton (fun w => w = true) + reasons := [fun _ option => optionReport option] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun w => w = false + response := fun w => if w then some "benefit exceeds cost within budget" else some "reconsider if the budget no longer permits this cost" +theorem switchValueProcedure : ValueProcedure switchPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [switchPosition], ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · refine ⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + · intro w _ _ allReasons + have evidence := allReasons (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) (List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl) + change optionReport true at evidence + have benefitAboveBudget : 3 < optionBenefit true := by rw [evidence.2]; decide + exact ⟨Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt evidence.1 benefitAboveBudget, evidence.1⟩ + · intro w _ _; cases w <;> simp [switchPosition] +/- Adopting the other option updates the adopted starting state too, so rejection cannot be blamed on an inconsistent start. -/ +def oppositePosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with adopted := false, starting := singleton (fun w => w = false) } +/- The alternative has a joint adoption witness but its actual zero benefit/cost fails the adopted strict-benefit objective. -/ +theorem oppositePositionRejected : JointAdoption oppositePosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure oppositePosition := by + have witness : JointAdoption oppositePosition := by + refine ⟨false, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + refine ⟨witness, ?_⟩ + intro h + have allReasons : ∀ reason, reason ∈ oppositePosition.reasons → reason false oppositePosition.adopted := by + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + have bad := h.2.2.1 false ((modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl) trivial allReasons + exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 bad.1 +/- Contradictory starting assumptions and an impossible selected/adopted equality are separate inadmissible variants. -/ +def contradictoryStartingPosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with starting := singleton (fun _ => False) } +def impossibleAdoptionPosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with selected := fun _ => false } +/- The common-world witness rejects both contradiction and an impossible commitment instead of proving them vacuously. -/ +theorem inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected : + ¬ ValueProcedure contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure impossibleAdoptionPosition := by + constructor + · intro h; obtain ⟨w,hw,_,_,_⟩ := h.2.1 + exact (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hw + · intro h; obtain ⟨w,_,_,hw,_⟩ := h.2.1 + cases hw +/- Removing the reasons leaves only a position and assertion, which fails this value procedure. -/ +def unsupportedPosition : ValuePosition Bool := { switchPosition with reasons := [] } +def switchEmpirical : Facet Bool := + .empirical [switchRecord] (fun _ => True) (fun w => w = true) (fun _ => True) +theorem switchEmpiricalDischarged : FacetDischarged switchEmpirical := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (switchCompatible true).2 rfl, trivial⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w hw _; exact switchSupported w hw + · intro w _; trivial +/- A mixed empirical/value position has actual empirical evidence but still lacks its value-reason duty. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem mixedMissingResponsibility : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬ LabeledDuties [] (fun f : Facet Bool => f = switchEmpirical ∨ f = .value unsupportedPosition) := by + refine ⟨switchEmpiricalDischarged, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := (h (.value unsupportedPosition) (Or.inr rfl)).1 + exact bad rfl +/- A fully identified argument may still fail to entail the stated conclusion. -/ +def uninformativeArgument : Articulation Bool := + ⟨["switch state"], emptyTheory, [fun _ => True], fun _ => True⟩ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem articulationNotSupport : Articulated uninformativeArgument ∧ + ¬ Entails uninformativeArgument.assumptions (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by + exact ⟨⟨by simp [uninformativeArgument], by simp [uninformativeArgument]⟩, + consistentIncomplete.2.1⟩ +/- Identifiable but unrelated argument fields cannot replace the actual observation grounds under the connected adapter. -/ +theorem unrelatedArticulationRejected : + Articulated uninformativeArgument ∧ FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬ FacetArticulated uninformativeArgument switchEmpirical := by + refine ⟨articulationNotSupport.1, switchEmpiricalDischarged, ?_⟩ + intro h + have relation := congrFun h.1 (Compatible [switchRecord]) + have bad : False := relation.mpr rfl + exact bad +/- Repetition of the same unrelated temperature observation leaves the switch state undetermined. -/ +def temperatureRecord : Record (Bool × Bool) := ⟨Prod.fst, true⟩ +theorem temperatureCompatible (b : Bool) : + Compatible [temperatureRecord, temperatureRecord] (true,b) := by + intro r hr + simp at hr + cases hr + rfl +/- The world identifies a selected action and its budget; the action costs three units. -/ +abbrev BudgetWorld := Bool × Nat +/- A real issued announcement asserts the selected action, but says nothing about affordability. -/ +def announcement : String := "activate" +def announcementPosition : ValuePosition BudgetWorld where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := Prod.fst + outcome := fun _ option => (optionBenefit option, optionCost option) + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun w option => optionCost option ≤ w.2 + starting := singleton (fun w => w.1 = true) + reasons := [fun _ option => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun w => w.2 < 3 + response := fun _ => some "reconsider the action when its cost exceeds budget" +/- The zero-budget counterworld satisfies the stated starts, adoption and all announced reasons jointly. -/ +theorem announcementHasJointAdoption : JointAdoption announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨(true,0), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := + List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl +/- A nonempty announcement remains true in a jointly admissible zero-budget world but cannot support the action's affordability. -/ +theorem announcementNotBudgetReason : + announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ announcementPosition.commitment (true,0) ∧ + (∀ reason, reason ∈ announcementPosition.reasons → reason (true,0) announcementPosition.adopted) ∧ + ¬ announcementPosition.consequence (true,0) ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [announcementPosition], rfl, ?_, (by intro h; cases h.2), ?_⟩ + · intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl + · intro h + have allReasons : ∀ reason, reason ∈ announcementPosition.reasons → reason (true,0) announcementPosition.adopted := by + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl + have bad := h.2.2.1 (true,0) ((modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl) trivial allReasons + cases bad.2 +/- A repeated actual selection observation contains no budget information. -/ +def actionRecord : Record BudgetWorld := ⟨Prod.fst, true⟩ +theorem actionCompatible (budget : Nat) : Compatible [actionRecord, actionRecord] (true,budget) := by + intro r hr; simp at hr; cases hr; rfl +/- Single and repeated irrelevant observations cannot establish the other outcome or the same action's budget adequacy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem measurementRepeatNotSupport : + temperatureRecord.test (true,false) = true ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,false) ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,0) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,3) ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord,actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨rfl, temperatureCompatible false, temperatureCompatible true, ?_, ?_, + actionCompatible 0, actionCompatible 3, ?_, ?_, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.2⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h (true,false) (by intro r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; rfl) + cases bad + · intro h; have bad := h (true,false) (temperatureCompatible false); cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (true,0) (by intro r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; rfl) + cases bad.2 + · intro h; have bad := h (true,0) (actionCompatible 0); cases bad.2 +/- Missing reason records fail a procedure; independently, a present announcement fails the explicit budget-support criterion. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem selfAssertionNotReason : + (unsupportedPosition.commitment true ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure unsupportedPosition) ∧ + (announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ announcementPosition.commitment (true,0) ∧ + ¬ announcementPosition.consequence (true,0) ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition) ∧ + JointAdoption announcementPosition := + ⟨⟨rfl, fun h => h.1 rfl⟩, + ⟨announcementNotBudgetReason.1, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.1, + announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.1, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.2⟩, + announcementHasJointAdoption⟩ +/- The value procedure is satisfiable although the adopted starting commitment is not entailed by empty facts. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem valueWithoutSelfProof : ValueProcedure switchPosition ∧ + Satisfiable switchPosition.starting ∧ + ¬ Entails (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) switchPosition.commitment ∧ + (JointAdoption oppositePosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure oppositePosition) ∧ + (¬ ValueProcedure contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure impossibleAdoptionPosition) := + ⟨switchValueProcedure, ⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, consistentIncomplete.2.1, + oppositePositionRejected, inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected⟩ +/- The world records the selected option and its actual benefit/cost outcomes. -/ +abbrev BenefitCostWorld := Bool × (Nat × Nat) +def measuredOutcome (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Nat × Nat := + if option then world.2 else (0,0) +def benefitReason (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Prop := + (measuredOutcome world option).1 = 4 +def costReason (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Prop := + (measuredOutcome world option).2 ≤ 3 +/- Neither recorded benefit nor recorded cost alone establishes the selected option's joint consequence. -/ +def jointReasonPosition : ValuePosition BenefitCostWorld where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := Prod.fst + outcome := measuredOutcome + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun world option => (measuredOutcome world option).2 ≤ 3 + starting := singleton (fun world => world.1 = true) + reasons := [benefitReason, costReason] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun world => 3 < world.2.2 + response := fun _ => some "reassess the option when its cost exceeds the budget" +/- These two content constraints jointly establish the consequence in a nonempty adopted world. -/ +theorem jointReasonProcedure : ValueProcedure jointReasonPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [jointReasonPosition], ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · refine ⟨(true,(4,3)), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + change reason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason] at hr + rcases List.mem_cons.mp hr with hr | hr + · subst reason; rfl + · have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + change 3 ≤ 3; exact Nat.le_refl 3 + · intro world _ _ reasons + have benefit := reasons benefitReason (by change benefitReason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason]; simp) + have cost := reasons costReason (by change costReason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason]; simp) + change (measuredOutcome world true).1 = 4 at benefit + change (measuredOutcome world true).2 ≤ 3 at cost + refine ⟨?_, cost⟩ + have bigger : 3 < (measuredOutcome world true).1 := by rw [benefit]; decide + exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt cost bigger + · intro world _ _ + exact ⟨"reassess the option when its cost exceeds the budget", rfl, by decide⟩ +/- Each separate reason has a concrete same-start/limit/adoption counterworld; their conjunction is sufficient. -/ +def JointReasonsExample : Prop := + ValueProcedure jointReasonPosition ∧ + (Models jointReasonPosition.starting (true,(4,5)) ∧ jointReasonPosition.limits (true,(4,5)) ∧ + jointReasonPosition.commitment (true,(4,5)) ∧ benefitReason (true,(4,5)) true ∧ + ¬ jointReasonPosition.consequence (true,(4,5))) ∧ + (Models jointReasonPosition.starting (true,(0,3)) ∧ jointReasonPosition.limits (true,(0,3)) ∧ + jointReasonPosition.commitment (true,(0,3)) ∧ costReason (true,(0,3)) true ∧ + ¬ jointReasonPosition.consequence (true,(0,3))) +theorem jointReasonsExample : JointReasonsExample := by + refine ⟨jointReasonProcedure, + ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, rfl, ?_⟩, + ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, Nat.le_refl 3, ?_⟩⟩ + · intro h; have bad : 5 ≤ 3 := h.2; omega + · intro h; have bad : 3 < 0 := h.1; omega +/- Empirical observations, semantic inference and criticism-responsive reasons coexist without a scalar score. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem heterogeneousReasons : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.inferential (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) (fun w => w = true)) ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.value switchPosition) ∧ JointReasonsExample := by + refine ⟨switchEmpiricalDischarged, ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩, switchValueProcedure, jointReasonsExample⟩ + intro w hw; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 hw + +/- This local observation checks the actual output on input zero. -/ +def zeroRecord : Record (Nat → Bool) := ⟨fun f => f 0, true⟩ +def localGenerator (seed : Nat) : Nat → Bool := fun n => n == seed +/- All outputs being true is a stronger, explicitly quantified capability claim. -/ +def allTrue : Claim (Nat → Bool) := fun f => ∀ n, f n = true +theorem zeroCompatible (f : Nat → Bool) : Compatible [zeroRecord] f ↔ f 0 = true := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h zeroRecord (by simp) + · intro hf r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; exact hf +/- A generating subject owns an earlier predicate and a seed used to revise that actual predicate. -/ +structure GeneratingProcess where + owner : Nat + prior : Nat → Bool + generateSeed : Nat +/- The revision preserves prior successes and adds the seed-selected case through the actual generator. -/ +def GeneratingProcess.outputRevision (process : GeneratingProcess) : Nat → Bool := + fun input => process.prior input || localGenerator process.generateSeed input +/- A produced revision retains its producer and exact old/new objects. -/ +structure ProducedRevision where + producer : Nat + before : Nat → Bool + after : Nat → Bool +/- The subject itself constructs the owned before/after revision object. -/ +def GeneratingProcess.produce (process : GeneratingProcess) : ProducedRevision := + ⟨process.owner, process.prior, process.outputRevision⟩ +def sampleGeneratingProcess : GeneratingProcess := ⟨17, fun _ => false, 0⟩ +/- This same-owner revision actually changes input zero, while its produced predicate still fails at input one. -/ +def OwnedRevisionExample : Prop := + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.producer = sampleGeneratingProcess.owner ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.before = sampleGeneratingProcess.prior ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after = sampleGeneratingProcess.outputRevision ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.before 0 = false ∧ sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after 0 = true ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after 1 = false ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue +/- Actual producer/old/new links and the compatible failing revision witness the insufficiency of self-origin. -/ +theorem ownedRevisionExample : OwnedRevisionExample := by + refine ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,(zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after ((zeroCompatible _).2 rfl) 1 + cases bad +/- The generator's own sample succeeds, but its generated revision has a concrete unsupported global claim. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem selfOriginDoesNotSupport : + localGenerator 0 0 = true ∧ localGenerator 0 1 = false ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue ∧ OwnedRevisionExample := by + refine ⟨rfl, rfl, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, ?_, ownedRevisionExample⟩ + intro h + have bad := h (localGenerator 0) ((zeroCompatible _).2 rfl) 1 + cases bad +/- A proper local observation allows both a universally successful and a failing extension. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem localNotUniversal : + (∃ outside : Nat, outside ≠ 0) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (fun _ => true) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + allTrue (fun _ => true) ∧ ¬ allTrue (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := by + refine ⟨⟨1, by decide⟩, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, + (fun _ => rfl), ?_, selfOriginDoesNotSupport.2.2.2.1⟩ + intro h; have bad := h 1; cases bad +/- Two implementations agree on the actual observed input and differ on a specified relevant omitted input. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem hiddenDifference : + (∀ n : Nat, n = 0 → (fun _ : Nat => true) n = localGenerator 0 n) ∧ + (fun _ : Nat => true) 1 ≠ localGenerator 0 1 := by + refine ⟨?_, by decide⟩ + intro n hn; cases hn; rfl +/- One observation supplies only its actual input-specific consequence, without repetition. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem singleObservation : [zeroRecord].length = 1 ∧ + (∃ f, Compatible [zeroRecord] f) ∧ + Supports [zeroRecord] (fun f => f 0 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := + ⟨rfl, ⟨localGenerator 0, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl⟩, + (fun f hf => (zeroCompatible f).1 hf), selfOriginDoesNotSupport.2.2.2.1⟩ +/- This inferential assessment derives a successor value from its explicit numeric premise without observation. -/ +def arithmeticFacet : Facet Nat := .inferential (singleton (fun n => n = 2)) (fun n => n + 1 = 3) +def usesObservation {W : Type} : Facet W → Bool + | .empirical _ _ _ _ => true + | _ => false +/- An actual valid inferential assessment refutes a mandatory measurement/repetition/framework chain. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem noUniversalChain : FacetDischarged arithmeticFacet ∧ usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false := by + refine ⟨⟨⟨2, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩, rfl⟩ + intro n hn + have premise := (modelsSingleton (fun x : Nat => x = 2) n).1 hn + change n + 1 = 3 + rw [premise] +/- A trial has a reproducible setting, an actual outcome and a separately recorded outcome. -/ +structure Trial where + setting : Nat + actualOutcome : Nat + recordedOutcome : Nat +/- Verifying a record, reproducing settings and retaining a conclusion are separate predicates. -/ +def Verified (t : Trial) : Prop := t.recordedOutcome = t.actualOutcome +def Reproduced (a b : Trial) : Prop := a.setting = b.setting +def Bounded (t : Trial) : Prop := t.actualOutcome ≤ 2 +/- Same-setting possible trials can differ while preserving the chosen bound; no probability semantics is claimed. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem variableOutcomesStableBound : + let a : Trial := ⟨0,1,1⟩ + let b : Trial := ⟨0,2,2⟩ + Reproduced a b ∧ a.actualOutcome ≠ b.actualOutcome ∧ Bounded a ∧ Bounded b := by + simp [Reproduced, Bounded] +/- Concrete records distinguish record accuracy, condition reproduction and conclusion stability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem verificationReproductionStability : + (Verified ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Verified ⟨1,1,1⟩ ∧ ¬ Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨1,1,1⟩) ∧ + (Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Bounded ⟨0,3,2⟩) ∧ + (Bounded ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Bounded ⟨0,2,0⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,2,0⟩) := by + simp [Verified, Reproduced, Bounded] +/- Explanation certificates are executable syntax for this same arithmetic process. -/ +inductive Program where + | doubleInput + | constant (value : Nat) +def Program.eval : Program → Nat → Nat + | .doubleInput, n => n + n + | .constant value, _ => value +/- A process exposes outputs and an explanation response, whose certificate can be checked against those outputs. -/ +structure Process where + output : Nat → Nat + explanation : Option Program +/- The output-only application contract checks every relevant input. -/ +def OutputContract (p : Process) : Prop := ∀ n, p.output n = n + n +/- The explanation application contract requires a provided certificate faithful to this very process. -/ +def ExplanationContract (p : Process) : Prop := + ∃ program, p.explanation = some program ∧ ∀ n, program.eval n = p.output n +/- This process produces doubled values but returns no explanatory certificate. -/ +def outputOnlyProcess : Process := ⟨fun n => n + n, none⟩ +def explainedProcess : Process := ⟨fun n => n + n, some .doubleInput⟩ +/- Object scope fixes the very process whose contract is assessed; contract inputs themselves still range over all naturals. -/ +def processScope (assessed : Process) : Theory Process := + singleton (fun candidate => candidate = assessed) +/- This inferential facet checks an explicit contract under exact process-identity assumptions. -/ +def processContractFacet (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) : Facet Process := + .inferential (processScope assessed) contract +/- The scope's compatible interpretations are exactly this assessed process, not an unrelated substitute. -/ +theorem processScopeModels (assessed candidate : Process) : + Models (processScope assessed) candidate ↔ candidate = assessed := + modelsSingleton (fun process => process = assessed) candidate +/- A concrete contract proof supplies the facet's consequence for its scoped object. -/ +theorem processContractDischarged (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) (proof : contract assessed) : + FacetDischarged (processContractFacet assessed contract) := by + refine ⟨⟨assessed,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + intro candidate hc + have same := (processScopeModels _ _).1 hc + subst candidate + exact proof +/- Scoped capability grounds include exact claim, object-specific assumptions, canonical articulation and actual assessment. -/ +def ProcessGrounds (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) : Prop := + Grounds contract canonicalArticulation (fun facet => facet = processContractFacet assessed contract) + [processContractFacet assessed contract] +theorem processGrounds (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) (proof : contract assessed) : + ProcessGrounds assessed contract := by + have discharged := processContractDischarged assessed contract proof + refine ⟨by simp, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro facet hf; subst facet; exact List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl + · intro facet hf; have hf' := List.mem_singleton.mp hf; subst facet + exact ⟨rfl,canonicalArticulated _ discharged,canonicalFacetArticulated _,discharged⟩ +/- Universal output correctness here comes from the concrete program definition, not from an assumed capability label. -/ +theorem outputCorrectByEvaluation : OutputContract outputOnlyProcess := fun _ => rfl +/- This same process actually returns no explanation certificate. -/ +theorem outputOnlyNoExplanation : ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess := by + rintro ⟨program,h,_⟩; cases h +/- The full application contract requires outputs and an explanation of that same process. -/ +def FullProcessContract (assessed : Process) : Prop := OutputContract assessed ∧ ExplanationContract assessed +/- Output-only grounds have the assessed process itself as a counterworld to the stronger contract. -/ +def OutputContractEvidence : Prop := + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + Models (processScope outputOnlyProcess) outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬ Entails (processScope outputOnlyProcess) FullProcessContract +/- Existing output evidence does not supply the absent explanation for the same object and scope. -/ +theorem outputContractEvidence : OutputContractEvidence := by + refine ⟨processGrounds _ _ outputCorrectByEvaluation, (processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl, ?_⟩ + intro stronger + exact outputOnlyNoExplanation (stronger outputOnlyProcess ((processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl)).2 +/- Both actual application contracts have grounds and explicit object scopes; neither scope is empty. -/ +def ScopedApplicationEvidence : Prop := + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + ProcessGrounds explainedProcess FullProcessContract ∧ + (∀ candidate, Models (processScope outputOnlyProcess) candidate ↔ candidate = outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + (∀ candidate, Models (processScope explainedProcess) candidate ↔ candidate = explainedProcess) ∧ + Satisfiable (processScope outputOnlyProcess) ∧ Satisfiable (processScope explainedProcess) +/- Concrete evaluation and a faithful double-input certificate establish the two differently scoped contracts. -/ +theorem scopedApplicationEvidence : ScopedApplicationEvidence := by + refine ⟨processGrounds _ _ outputCorrectByEvaluation, processGrounds _ _ ?_, + processScopeModels _,processScopeModels _,⟨_,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨_,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩⟩ + exact ⟨fun _ => rfl,⟨.doubleInput,rfl,fun _ => rfl⟩⟩ +/- Universal output correctness does not entail the explanation-requiring contract for the same process. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem outputNotExplanation : OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ OutputContractEvidence := + ⟨outputCorrectByEvaluation, outputOnlyNoExplanation, outputContractEvidence⟩ +/- Applications may use distinct contracts, and a faithful certificate can satisfy the stronger one. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem applicationContractsDiffer : + (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ¬ (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess)) ∧ + (OutputContract explainedProcess ∧ ExplanationContract explainedProcess) ∧ + ScopedApplicationEvidence := + ⟨⟨outputCorrectByEvaluation, fun h => outputOnlyNoExplanation h.2⟩, + ⟨(fun _ => rfl), ⟨.doubleInput, rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩⟩, scopedApplicationEvidence⟩ +/- The assessor supplies a mathematical certificate; the process's own explanation response is unnecessary. -/ +structure ExternalCertificate (p : Process) where + assessorId : Nat + assessedId : Nat + distinctParticipants : assessorId ≠ assessedId + outputCorrect : ∀ n, p.output n = n + n +/- The external assessor 42 evaluates the specified process 7; the full output proof is constructed by evaluation. -/ +def externalOutputCertificate : ExternalCertificate outputOnlyProcess := + ⟨42,7,by decide,fun _ => rfl⟩ +/- An external certificate establishes the output contract without producing an internal explanation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem externalAssessment : + (∃ certificate : ExternalCertificate outputOnlyProcess, + certificate.assessorId = 42 ∧ certificate.assessedId = 7 ∧ + certificate.assessorId ≠ certificate.assessedId ∧ OutputContract outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess := + ⟨⟨externalOutputCertificate,rfl,rfl,externalOutputCertificate.distinctParticipants, + externalOutputCertificate.outputCorrect⟩, + processGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract externalOutputCertificate.outputCorrect, + outputOnlyNoExplanation⟩ +/- This argument records concepts and actual premises for a semantic inference, separately from executable tests. -/ +def arithmeticArticulation : Articulation Nat := canonicalArticulation arithmeticFacet +/- A reasoned inferential assessment needs no observation method, while applicable empirical assessment retains observations. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment +organon.relationships.terms#p1 sha256 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem nonExecutableAssessment : + Grounds (fun n : Nat => n + 1 = 3) canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = arithmeticFacet) [arithmeticFacet] ∧ + usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false ∧ + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ usesObservation switchEmpirical = true := by + refine ⟨⟨by simp, (by intro f hf; cases hf; simp), ?_⟩, rfl, switchEmpiricalDischarged, rfl⟩ + intro f hf; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hf; cases hf + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated _ noUniversalChain.1, canonicalFacetArticulated _, noUniversalChain.1⟩ + +end CoreReader.Evidence diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.olean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.olean new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d5f05a6e959744856caeb5c08bde36f8d5c1005 GIT binary patch literal 1052112 zcmb4scR*A}_x1t{t{poj8rK>uiP*6QMGeNn+OZ^pun0<7DT+0#v0%rG%A+pH|NfImSKr`f8YJX$Gy*))27e8yF`YW10oz98h_fT(Web` z@4q}7H1}-KbZ|qnM?j;&!Hqqd1Ozv35@2o;*eoEpVdLfvf;@wp3^tpa>U8xgjW_9Z ziN#xKNE#h;7kB6S_TQ{Cw-?2aR zr{KO&ic9?WIr0un<~Y+BEnF@Gcqb#;MCVg3~N2izZ zCN=1_ZhgBMT0fP_fF-hk+LJ(ab>ceK3x`d?D>)BI_N<=1tRa}a7$=ZXkb8?%_|w7 z&V~B{I~tMFfO-n?(-}77ZZg z-~Dtm$oMNZO-Wu>_fR6~)$-2w(f;Reb$dN~;5o@Vw&#y)#!$IXR?K63LKW^jje2A+s2p zRXy-8iS?{lb*A#JF+DXmNDur0mgK@pzq1YXTHbh^&t`r5(#vmK*l}((_*H_-12KQ} z2?&d|?;L8Jo<(H-rdS6@VLkDTH)j5QW#;zX z{_qdu0TA^PE$Sf5>^nHx95o_9nR}?5>SreFt$KCUqlD$VZ1s%!3|NT@iYp)@A~II2 zhr&f0^a+Umg1U3tAUV5BiTwIKipo5+-5!ziq;?B$lA%0cJ_BN267xE(k2F=Pp9!pI z#h7gC&Nt_5;}^z#Ali>uxA>~_Z7P?~gg+gIjjJ|2)20XU0YBtm!o^S}##RcqhuLBd zi0Kv?(^Ix}mdGEkv6zgvgj4dlTCEmsAR&qu;}j6{%b@7ca7+GSORFD$)?;OCyP$r= z&<%^CpbzDN$m9FQYqX;b);Hl%#-5jh-vvM);szrA5dl%50fR+Lij4`33^zxMC5`yh zPPBo%C5T#2#^N&mfUgJtcG79H5&BWTK-5?J*qBhWtZprCjQ>{Fb2F>%>UG21H9yG? z#yRxY{Q*w1vn&-4!w&it5dAACGFJHADZ&yPL!#P6`moN+W_$a`MPJOhH6nuqh)3Sg zZf<_-b+ONh7g{ws{6~LoE2fRW*f23|{Cl4KO2|B|FYjCW;q^m*l0DLg_6xL)gTwP? zHu5W;%O^8dTXMI^=<3IFpa=B_)E2IS6s;{XIyzM30=>3iiy{4}haBkNwtB;+*nhf1 zKiVA-?T^N>n1G19B#Q!So=qiX+*_)gJLwWxekk;zzJRE==+Mz--{3*f7Q20jmGvYs z?teXD(l@UcX>$eT5&aAZKSh7j6gD8kd};CWyqClJyp0b&ZZxIdw!4o%pYu%GM$g(u;Wki231ja|A6LX>+2CxKgpIH<$H} zIn{H>_~EU!`GI(kQZf$o!@w^OB(L{+qNRs;jJH_-Y_tsP{rO|VPO?C}h09~T8(7uq zc5|;T3%spn!h)E?xt6x`+^@Kd5J{H*dAPal3Byn;K7XB40qP&&BCUgxpl~Z2X>aHkJLFRB6}C zHl2t3g*dUE10vpkThOR^b1f_5tZ~)*Z}&#J7ynD2IO7o&!5bbD7MGeAf7Tatb?&wY zpZ)$N@f0`Ktw8uW+8iZzkl_~5b;TG?()sH(h4uY0X!}!V$D1v|XYqZkCsqY)`?E&p z+S)Ri?4h247=O)imau?`{3}TEAN|`{PUhpbL(OaLm)~AZ_DCP*10d#oZRNmqrRLSb zdd!y}9-TGUU0b>lpUC$y&jp>Ss?hR$6&dg zd=GwCp#O*qi1AnqzhdctW4rvPf~sEk@-iO>pOkQ2UT?+?(nWq^{sAH{QRZk1E&WLj z7wJR4v9i8ZAFlhn0yEIn0j-k2K!%Tht#~_o4FG zf1=+xXZNb}`=iaTNI&_DaS^B`TyU1C(8wqf5*O*gJm675#(gNO`_wPX`XzzS;`1of zpYxN1ta=lRr-8@$4*clw)UqwZG-xF8|CKkf-wzcVn*wB-{qx{5Ln%i9-?TjtcY4)LT1?G}iB9UdU2 zGhU*S9(OM9!)WYw^p)@Z=nJr8;rnP8<`cpi|# zdi~95S+mmLYWsLCE<1axOHN$$W^%iYu!neni0ktx+Um#+3hBXoXZ%3sC;03SBR^aB zL>rzdKNvTGSbx&EZGS+g>I-3gE??fXZVv4+6@Fn}0%Cl&?Jx3`jpH+kr#R5wfM|DtqIXC02?puGzBiHe{CFs%>Du*w)Q26+ z2Ut%}ZTL~wQmZQrgB|oEAo`Qo-p7Q5o5g1J-{(nPW$E{j7pHfO9n(}RMt-9_5bG1U zuFb!vRP$hBeIJyXR^i~#5q|LB%J(rIO#N|LNb_Ekv~-d^%tJtoW7__Rl!!~sQyS|# zKCEBoalKAH1)t6LG2a-nBOA^NUOo`KiT8n6uNrPwepRjA;abF#A85xwv}fg9JAd$^ zoEpE+M>3xwaj%!Tz8Dw+y=cckv}f#BY5XTyx=0_^UrDSl-q77=MeFgY;IV$d{>N}* zTCvNI8lNPd;=q0ch@spdx-%v-F9x#rc2^69^qWw z{fpb3j?MaG6P2g9-RM8!0%`@tXSu%fjR+gnEwY2%npgG9V3cvk|2*y6ulL+fCS9Z# zaRPBZplz6f+U7-{f9XiYwYV^D`?LP+kIL_Le6~qDe%0dUaU1>HQ1qdGRjt3Z`X>7r zKY+GzM2y&-g5qp;&~CEWj*qXYbhEX;+j#7o(f-qyL|h6lT=Mp&-7CjFaPuN{td*FpYRKa{yf+mEZ$fkDVYz9XYs5ry=5mu>1jVNA)fT0 zy#mn>wf)=w;rUVq>n&_;`}g`Ex@h|((u?s7h;dEZSM#9>=0LSwxL1>L*Is4ZV_J9a zCgQNQS3Xy&9eOpZM|k>j@EC6}AJ=aFlUMe*HXeu*;~Ws{wit8%@c{Lf%6=T(e(#Gf z%1-^!dP^IA1fK85w8oz))jVb}Y$%4LDa ze2?wNk0s3G&Uw#>7t z&--1O34K_{12OK#iic&Q<%{LBSUa?h8WKxS8mN%C)OxV8-k}-k9}Rl6?jz#KPpm_L znBV0*Y=2TfrSj{|WW7aNFR9j`akiF!(u;V3XfIN4{*|oir$z@Bp$$ z`Y;~=F;0eu#+ie zS*&;Z_ox2YGWbIu=*2h%#CRp=3zCxg#JK8NOUD1j(1>Ceo%X*Vp5n*241_*$u14?e zkeH7ALA$lGo+4Xn7fyfSY+HXAHA#|{R~5#*^A3|aN^4N!A)Q_ItMR6@{yM(p<0_3F zexKBkpO_bcm>(k|BRa&H17o$vKW(GM;xyXUQdPa~AItb3)*3l3HmF2%(o4KQ-^ck= z(d<7fo-5a*h5Xs1$AFXqi8*1z7=e)gUIJDw9y@nF3U zL_f)!@Bhd7H|rf%_{oe-bO{-lj8A>3LO#}(LT}~ z{Vxv_?c%by%Y3dMwybL3PfND3w~u-J*!t@Oz2yiALBXpM-Pq+uW5Gd{|eQlFbT(CQ0@Gm_>?*_UcArrcjJnGJZ^R=oAguM z7^i?(KLmya*j}h0JsGSghq2?B(}Eey6jZ4R7~%c(b+eR^ll?)#*Rt0%`|E;&W(3Ku|bMN8)r{KAqur_o924hnfS` z$GMsv`0H9v+S_oeS>MqM!uyeK@&oH6tWzFF?;l&CQHLwUlOLE@f#|R8VuOa5WBNu$ zh2?crH9v`LuXshrhg&L7)Yg-v5A!Mz;}6cSqr{65G3`cmpnY@xQ+??#;>m{o8#l@& z#Mk~3@nC<2{qwB(t^Te!@N+F*vX6NUi1sI5;|Y!7zDseS{fB%a^R}^e(|4ck{eD04 zf^`BA@rc8sz$kN!S$Xbiw@b|*M+)oz^U#DXBl-{i3~{*fe2@9)&%(!-@0vaRAb2b9 ztI@8z9w^guevdAG;IXd9J~O;gxsl^8>1x1#)FTk%uicbP;#xaF-YuWXe9Y=OC(EVr zu6XD(Xp%Y|5c&0$?`3GL+TPMw&+M?UPP>i`olXK;-ue6k?eV8wl@^W-ou{3DQ2k;3 z2*f@pZ+(&X4h8AMxvP79>G#wt55^5@d-pQz`SE?^F=D>kfNr%a&mo@dp?-m=XYn4v z|5rUHvYpwpTFq{~wY|2UA^)(>$2fiRUh^JLwl&qvk$pUm0V2QRB?j%)UGfu`nqM~$ z8SkTuzI(RJX&*o`#AE-9{t@v-z1;&py`ptPEnmFvfImO|Hoe~TcF%472YCk~|JvzX z`_SmXkbtNm|ML7Snf)m-pyjQVRc>0zABqq00MTv&=$$P^55}on*3&I=p0Sb7RNHe2X2JlQ9+U&x#_!>S8cHov59XD4)-&6CPt?>} zeQoojiQi{M9(}Vv+U0Td(GAi;aiczgh(B5!L&f010UIR0VK0a6Jx;2+u0?mB)6j?d z0HR*_{jebWeu)0;)llZacXONBM{0edZA-{M%!feCi{g24Y(SW*jq}0J>l0XC$h!{H}_=VT6^U0L1eMsb{`}c-nqZ9a8cTIYb5a-B(A1o0*Uzxht~kQYDJyQ$mNN@t>zH$xxV7ZB|v!1lC9`i1poGV7Vs z`HaJBSpELBO%AY}&A0_e@L5_)X3~%-iR% zMVlX}{xD7fG0&R$yGZOT z&AkJNr+mOqAp8~k9lKSNj348Te-jyh#-rlpk^ z3=dEq`$2qPPNl}o-&@OF5f-*a%WN7{Dyi1;yg+jhx2xx zQf&?>t6!950dEZI+g>?@2sJX8F9;Kpfq5uB8 zyIPImj*YeTs@A@FK1KUJGx@v2DJOP~B>j{()C&;nh-h;Ry+o)*LV9p+>(yN5=gF^s zRekdID=pom2m2f#`mdNTV#BrXi18*tXe52uC&aV99us?3Ji700BQi)l)*Fbc$I975 z^i!YjApXDXiS=c)s1xz_dVYHt2XfionZvKHPac-E81@h!>^)hzaNf*-%$?w|{zE-9 z%1yXFH@;gl_=9r@Ao_c>_EngFe=C#XM7xV`A@kbEeb44^E|qHsz37iX^h>eb6W{ML z7g(Pljx5$!=Jc*ZwK^}i)f4mpp)ZymOWS>`K=sd~rS$JR=O%-nEbrlnyrBJ|ef?hh zSmlRb9M#U3sGc;#LKujCDaVx#_!idx?3YPw|7p2HCn^tpZrkr6Uf3@)y3e;yH?<6a zf7sVzU-aFR4!WP`uJ{T(+8N4kxqD*h!;IN^^8@!Ew2MZ4i)`-DBWNj=r}!|w0nv|m zw$k*FEM1gO9nZ7YR$Si?=2d-nZm2ellRlhd0#Q$VqC#J^%zt>mdeM$DSZ~?pPxnnb z*isumNiW7LAkNX%=iC4FzN&j`>2I%3ZvJ|>Me-kr2lF}3!{)WNlxmk2sV(owZWR&~ z7f^e^AwK7gn_^}cUoiT&Q&YA5C9(ao57zihy1IEe>C|{W--P{MW0o(C2x)f=yoKLK z#(v^&r)K?zy1RA-kA98kS>?tWcLvV2+y;;KjrP-|*Mur(zxz{b{}dnU9f_pEW9Xla?0Jhk6I1{`Ka@MrwA!CF;x>Utze3)6FAtA) zyx4azc=TKF&zxqwv$oiy^%wFN`2-@bbbesAD1$rui}@sz{T-1SoHV?l=l_=;?G^2@{Ij1Htr&Q<40scdM>vN#f3JSu9m8s9+ii*y z>p&ppV|gws`x@z@OYL8-ZDl;=ONQ+lQt`xj;z=LI3n0dgpwMWsJ_w94X$#pK}4Hde7482$%0I|*w6a!qo#jBm4sjP2n8UGKxrhGb-^lA2RZou!4 zJRh=bz`IKi$AQQEk8z@z$Btzs2N@H=qu#JD8JY8TMB0!XTYJso_Y84vF)}E0-n-2= z-=KVIQJFuq=WY7dH;dGtr1?jAM4UjxEBDj%E(d9nmzuxic2e&)kG-E&oHut=j9K<-;EZptEY-U#Cp?N z@5sq@eCrmjTZd$b$NCxl<-+jau8g`CHWNJhBkHx;;GfEPG);5_?^a9ti*c^+tC&S8 zH640^Pvz(A;75M6)l#GNQ*HfDaUowoNhNTm@qNA0@xaO=4OeVaKZjx5q+F ze%$)_Q*GQLJ=hlkFBYizj?$rBmvTk`46Zqzy!zVJNz>qnmR3htgk#f%J|)KzA;Ri z7Q2un$R5@i*dOG^Wsm!!e~&og$sXD@5bZmfzIY>EkcbgKMqu}K-h6hG*=}m5G26Ok zj0%KZtS2#U#VuPmze(nXMmCUh$ol-M)NXvR`K(W1 z4{@TMr*2xdtnSR0uVD}49}w*szXL*YxX2#Xbp{{lf9eIZ=bjgT^d}keAMF^3{N#;y zwyy=^>pJ=J;>UV(KU>=Uvk4cp_Dptho&>wiZ%0?y>g1=zNp{g5foPZVnPvVJx|+8P zw%2dzxRw24nr@{yG@jSTSdUbE_H68=9hXlbPMpI6wS|Nr&BF(2Z3ueOxF30SlKJX4 z|MH@7=UY629<*y9+PCJHZEnXM^9{UB< z-^KG4%P!A(Jr_LI(I|iM{@z8SuEyRYp8Q3B29_a0T(J?+^4soWN5N0RB_aM*+m*31 z*LTazi)ZSLyFo&v7ySVU{l5Rl_l)CM@2E0MZ~H_|Jqo?(zd-b3K7ouTIb5or8LaPv zfhSY0ZJ+TS$&jBocL3u2A+I0*+Y>lxLDg^UBJ`=4}7XOQ9eAABgc(wm0uc?YX~nSJoT%_bk@8Bj}y`RsWvHNQB}+d%-yR zN*____zmx_u!sH&L_gNDWShea?rSkWn!3t7jjmey#LKz;v~-YN^aI#kT=?zO-VJ=U za~P^8)H4w4kbtnTUQw}TEkdvI7GM3I+_hb)clPmP zzHCu`aLqGCJ8Jo+^5~D?M+g5|;fEV5+>syn2ZW!ZKE#ld=O@M)OE>AyjvhZON+{|$ z0)8MLuybku+ugpCM)Uv=Kaj5-RUQqV()Z3v_<{KWi1xwf-RjqyWV_&XaxVMxs#&F9 zj=hMotpiaWh;~NntO#+=DE7m)FXd65@P2@guZ(Zm`1t{)BEMJ#|Ks>R#_a)POKsWN zZ}cnh*e_w+8gsCi`z2F{@4;J~rC#i(mP|U9VaN*T1Rncfthbh2xuWm)cvB1FsXbvn z0AgOi^M|~r(z0LR_k`R`((aOk@rydRpS}QlcrOh83^+8V*`~_7Z1suf%$OgSd~&Vi z`Nt=<;fDOdxC3+}#p1I6J*I+hBT4_zzmnO%ou$_P=uy6s78dEpIt7SvS@|8Q0z;76 zpA6k)+&e!RviHj~^_<8z(u;8bi19$K;|i#xVmei?KkI!Rd$COF$aHP}O+5Ms+W*ey zgGPQ|G1Rsn#eM_(_1Ar_#SL$Ca|-mMJoY1F9()qrD14}GKMx-L=k+H4IyZZqs*Lhj zci=g4rLZv$l`GXa1YXDIw6Omss7LSLTc^GOZ{l$V?V(lGRW9R(RUQQ%&zaFam%ePO z`=|9f6Y-SS()1s30g>M*@mzI;I85;t-`@%i42=$#V%ooI-cozW`r37G?dwh7ZV)PE z-m$*Kdw*~Kx%5HvS69w~$9@>+OK%)D*50xCKuzMwFN`NZj0b$|_}+2F)KmKNrsn41 z{Yy>LhDY)j{vb~S4;MfC(d{0);1Bkv@aIay3g0#v^6O~uSa)K7{w6BD#K~%xZ1W@X z21NVJn}6FW-#{U)GEW%4biJhCyOW1TG+ha?ALG}XT7xZ5jcb0U@{}j^FCf-G z1^2sobEVoZ;#mKcAF`%+->>dPdWpC4dkM%_>n>euPxJTH@3U7kM6^Sh2~CzKv>-0xFO73i{!mN#D)8-m$-JKDT|plh6I$ zmM!UjV9}C$RG$1sy8xnngoFl(-~W`~RLl3{Tx=KPt+9{v`=b?AuGPQYB8BvlUzoq) z*H^XMkLh{lXYJgH?4n%&kvF++6DK}O;z%c5YQ7TL?pO0i<~C~j!28(JnVyoc`|;>mBcDlEK+MD1`OE*u_xRlXWPELo?Z33+WTG#rrM%&}7EqgL1Q#12 zMs)hMD79PKP4cS$@vQ&amh0PAu5KAi`iXbt@fGvc*OqFQ54)GP&38%segXQ?^7x$K zJ59R|LwURhgmLA1r9z9$M?H_)c%IMDuHKnq`DetIHAnMgN4*$o- zMYXT%FYPa%@pV{(uX-hse&VqXG4gug`jW3orSEvQgm_{9`B3o>UBF~sXZv9N!04fu z`V$!O`x&Xc&Q0QTx?Dz6At|5Bn85owcOK`gjOmPSMWlQxqbr_AFzSj)K7~Xv z#CklLKc_QdeDy3Lp5QqG?-g)xWGwF28?jAKk>OyK7~_}v;Ee{a`^5$nxF z{%qjiBk*HPVbt;W{EdupjA@Knj2`?xcM>Ch=f}YBue&o^88aAj7=7?PZhYUGF`Lng zzbBl;n8s+RD)ZpZ7{ZvsXsE_{VvJ)Ob!oL@c3<9h~i{Mo|&Ae}$Ee#xzFHMzUNyV+LamqibWydoX4( z>YB*=Mn*5j1jZCbyoX?HD&@Tx{TZ>3v-0OmM)zh?K8`V+F`Lnc=Tpq9Y5W=UK^A}3 z@%v;(#t_C-#!N={7Sf&%5dDikr!l(nc{ui`R{osDsB6V}Vf143XG~$lI?=%I&G<7~ z8M7F5ZCD?p7o$HT){`mtY>@JX&m{UW#xW)`rZQsxXW;iGOc)pVa{^-uV+LamqgPvL zCy_Cm(a=ubcW3lr3}K9C%w%-;mhwJ~$&9-8^1hMLi_xFa%9zEd>%j7iA&l6^xOJ3# z2xB~B7NhQSF3%Xpn9i8Z=;bgkYpD~TmwX3}E!HC~~iRaJBj5&<1-B_N{#F&WBE|O2>&zX$w zzVdz|V=7}NV=kkQNy=d#8N#3A8L=PA=FeW;SubNMV) z@Vwi8nbxTrM}hxvLx*2Gx)yH zsa@TA_YL9y67QVDyeDJ3!G5D4OXV>h<6h6lIYza-#}H{Bl?H=7AH3x5ii|y6aB_M|8(C&r`Kh0UR^_F9=sS$jEIlqU3Cr)A$*@c3+^S_ z1`zVv0S5_*OXS1WZlt&qZuGa~2Q(o)g4bi+DRgRA=1=3avt#-o+Jhc(lns5e z7&#I5ol;rf2Fu1X_);+Sqd2~w$e6(xV=9*FfWc6jBKx*H`Z&utub+R>W8&d48%adv z@gDlz9OHr`kNp}GFMNLQ-wo;(ke3NnkKZt9XUWy;AuWm@U&eOyR=$rsH2%0Uj%f1v z5nol7uj3Xpt^I0)_PP-Hf!qM0Cx8s_rTUS@_Fk9*M}1NCSQv?r9<*~H^bPW2B?3r~ zAx!$=&e*Wz%67BAeyg1~lO8-r1Y$lKB))N?{b7+jb(%gC>#;Dtx^#VKnXHJ;Bu4ts zCxLkXW>CneAy7qrC2{#Q#*RCRocyO=*%>4wc*ktMFLY|xsk2Rd4&QRnj=lfOPP@oR zEk{&H&7*s`%)_gChciji7 zRycYQD|sL0k*CGkzw~tS(rBtD7yEh*VfpFRD}16aSg$Vj^%~Fe=EEx+IUA*3{7d@n z>ot|-GrHeB?ou$XF81}1&GOdZ{*M1r4=(og;5J<5V|w*HI;sctqIy98L;v()d6J`g zh~v)=NoOCybr&EZRn@?5}l+xICm~jGUDEQ=ST6UwV+0)`W46JOFAxm-nw$yTM`oE zl+Ev7N^R;-isgMrhcuRleY!97>67?=CgYi%-j}pOl6TJG`-rdSs}WhyA@IHPpzV)E zNj)~dJfdYD=F~Lj7Jk0>I@uyW{P;fnxc%)}?VUU3o#U8CzPGqmZUH|;dFMpt(VwPA zeUj+N?U?+;_zlFo7=xF=*iRFWqnWI){ImU)QVS2avLAX~O#XWGzxCNx;^-njQn{Rw zHDJPKV*@G)s1E`L(j% zD)Vb5AL!}Rm;KVG+WGzWhIvq}`JKr;@>lrofI<$6-?_{qt_3-*=ODinmp}7vu`)l0 z&mA7>tmGf-XCUgqH#lzvsK(*PdZzxhChTeEzP~9B$`8r|p(oN#kCn?OF*=5|s20?q zVJ7LJ@kHp-E+Bmn_Vwv3pUvpeX`7prl=Z6{A>%`TC_MSeK5pu2X9{qzjx@bPK?dP~0_H#EsUUKBW_H%e&?t_F{RX#oVv=iwQ_8c)^VE^dS zE9-?LSA?iPC&MW22Z`UGRQHwHY#;r@o#pPle%H+25Aqx9gj6o)#qw=itefTdFY7ft z_r`k7!t&&|$jy7ld2!AbL^5=V_-y?pjmuA*nf@T*&;-aL%8p29BRj~&Or)IlTb+q?OD9>njLZ|Ig@5ggFA}RkN{5gry z|M;9gmHg}R-U0L#Y326{iYYHxr)P5c!+mlVIvAw{@u_@2mvMj2rWTIwdAyPDyN#83 zdG^z(75Y3ruf0{4{Gqn>Go~bcq@7)m|9HLz{}QXOe;~DM@j1t_Uewz^AOBNYtvBpL z5?O9gx5AaN&!m3l$M?}MQ~7i1{E{!6I8N0b;>~2a&wt!IONqzXlkXeG$#@p*7`M-v z=E%tasB%B7H%sl?SOkA0Wm{DVo zeGERGdHinZ$Zxj3I2!Pz8S{?W%vTvcbveZ{q<_tT)EY_J*HS1BQ6<_1M1QAqChwRy zjiWdWU(0;CGZxdGt+!5hco7K@Z{qtnhw}7)R_AfbaN9g&VIJ=f*X?xihsa-@@jjOx z&jZOvx~7<{-Q@o?{dznf248>D*bxfvoWc50p95ER?FU)mpC0cu;a+3M;qBD&uGakR z;lNr;0AxjZXAkDlZ(pq$=B19OIc(p=a!&P+pI7z^dc1c5oh2Kz>7d$Au(QAGZG+yB zCHpCM_W#;kJX^JIVLpQ~yUzDhu^*xM@ty{BdRQx`sPxdNbDQPKHkrO&YCZKYu_y*A4q?Ko&9URp+?9OpJHdfWqirt|g_Y9!Zaq9dRs{I5z`@LT;OoFTyzn%SF9%sH&?OT}7U`!dj>k7_uH2W=Ne9*b+ z^XRLpeb;aD$A4u*-~N!*;%6T5m(un7TD70Uc1tkeAwbFh~LUo5eiFgLQ-ME`hAT_dY+6 zBc99*`GGRVNisiA&A;x5iuz_Z+i~#W`xw8c9PBf&@FC1&{60MI*~3qtx7!Xr zo_UPlM;DoHPr2Ns8uO0H%wzoS*U8^;wac9zD4!1dJpN424yZowl~*h9+00{HZn|MX zLfH*JX}J>dIT|L*xU>mH6e`yD?q{cB{Vr2^$`jUoK2 znD=M=`47vDqKbXImj?UWoZ5_1?I+pUpES$+Eo3SFG&}n*$KEfY+P5;F#n|)vJMP64 z`*`mJI`6k!eOI+_oSHxWtA{`73R$x6#XRC48-MwnYG22^KjWhy*L?k`4OAEoeTUA*+` z@-LwaX{`dAlp9gp(bj0iXIj77uMD0E{!dT;vR2if zZm0i&PwmfC{mIN{Gk$TvFdyqO8h7mTWtcAgeRTHaQ1wiRY*PKh5Bf~?Z=XN9PxbH4 z_S{*YA7coks)zP3R=!W=1^3?hNjnH8A#sWP+vcYJgz zr+aj%~EoO=KVky2M?(S{|bG!dGA@9YV+y-?A5pC25fJq?M%sD+6-Aw*pFPC7+UH{sio6N zmiR2@G4GWM-rw=@rAgY3mGtXo%JSMqNR+8`IjvdaIy1U+c|G2nbf6pJ^82!Uefd8v zuR5$>s#M)KUuTkx(Ch5Qdi@!vS8Z_9LE-WIBaZp|iFLyq^LRbptA*XI;mt5LQ(Vre zcKY8uGB#KBXEKlHnhX5ae5vSn&Sf6;aB}^~$xeCpofE;&lKJVkXyI_Z!b3mKSsFOD z@1W}U<8o*>S>4WhsQNvbk7FD^vH5ss)-Pgy@A+BVykkGggRR}CvYrN4&MqB&zS&f& z3Bl{L_`cAoT_dZ++n$GsexWPM_nUv8*-YmzKd9~0I9tY#cKXz%n8ktRxG34NjgOuz z-`_uUjU&quAHw(19{gW?HO5Kd5S>f@#4E5b%@1z7r zFP(Og{cJ9W`l=CkYOIsOr!#MuBjY`>^4vxje_5XLVdVCZ$oX_#H7v%Z~cSGZMKINvtjr|^C3vzDEY?=foOiMc4B!94a^5d*r#l`NKK0iVM>_F3I~ z|FWj>gVoW@JGy==^MLs#c%{RmsY^O*V?O!k!93=h6#-uy?OeF|Qs_4^kNIZNgW?nG ztoHi_`Yp`k`=37No|ilA*WwiMlqak;fH?2;Q69jnc}ih@-oLEf`^CXTZQd5VK9ld` z`FqOe#{$R(U4nPcWgg?zM;9+Qa`e||jd%M_<^k;~X6M)YoD|-Zd6b`iZRt1ac;&}D z+S8d56V_n7au9K98$w|Yh;bOdi;6Zu9;xvrvfftC$FEhs^3rxbn$GvpE}HnAs$?uu zzcb2bGmmx=kYdSbKWZTM*A9kxGG4Tc`|cf1Jf8Zq7ly7VrfY`r_*Ak;5rAaN%m@f_UWjU?V9@|YJI{t~vk38<{>$+O6@FwP67s&WS ze6GxQR(R9{#_26fJp3K~b=pPxOTiJ{;2r9 zwaDN>Av{t_d122sUZ$|VTCGFU>N`BQy^op2_c0C}S+`z0Ga?P-uWq4?6M612c;s2+ znRp}f$mcK4g=?w#^kN?Qto3R|8@-jZOa1=LW8OH>_24&ZJ`>nKE6df|_*1z;R;{?^ zUlQNPyyETWe%ipiXjd-D-0ri{zgYgn(tFmz+%BXxZJptgz~f#Vj|W*SzqiBek1*ds zp5hPT`NB0(=BbZq-s0l^QiALo?bbzJEa&sb1@{srXv&kfU$^+PeD$wOKPc&ye_f&J z=k*8HMF}ilDLk~hs~DX`o3ULaZ?8X%;*L`434i=`qlM#04xQKkDS~`vVYoWiYD&=kaNc5lGL9d=T7^MWY&m=CN#<*na zjS`N`lb;yxf$&%RT??rupP#xVGTzG(L1+Fr*5)9IkR5z)2=mL`uFc0gi1tSp*}?n` zEFvi#{T_E%Y_#pSX6Uw>-w?L1U zQ8D!Q9c;&_`Rrw~y^ni7{2+AVcI`|-jSu6P{_dCu*iTb@*yjV$ez@IyEIpI|s`2?O zmHE8W{qEi?BQjQz1ljZAaRc+nt_d~nI{4el+v+uu%da~={BK9*$se>^AnI4ESN2Br zBa`*4tbZrzmqAq;kR>&4jPHIQ)jjH9k$#XJ;5H;*+*e_cDqIE(ksaof;VOTj`g8ZPy zty?DjOl^Coodfd}w-c8GI`U_A0#@yNvYs7Qzti2v59m+g!oKZ2-9070TccwoG%i|M zUf8l-LZ99*TKbd7{JZBd8z4aO;3dz8F55clk|aa%cnp!{GPqpOo{lpe6h4LTXERpa zFv;IBkJp=AWO?{AsYYB!sa>`c_vQKZ?`{0ca8`wyHg~L3 zo_*(d=FuNM{I*7*Ug49ONB{h_x4wt7!W)=RXB>Rh+QmiTefU1cleWS8r>p)Ml4N`s z-+Ftw_EY_HXCCA5+3?=8RsVdL$2ukS+NuMpf7xt5gyk0A{$*An_D|&ez4M#aadh%h z+gmd031~e3>9>L2Kad3JLH`6|9OiLK-B#&TeL1YJiazbjH8ZDb`xa_%<=A$>;_Ji3GvD8uFvHy%?zE8uo4V@G|k?*5_rrq_9(kpx_ z^C(|y=BNl~h0kOj?dACA?UuSQPkF*P4#aq_ji33lq_uzBI@@ifjJNEL1F5r0Ug<*_ zp*&UKJe?YJ?2Il=exQDdc{7B|wcVI7*FoWt2P^Zrn@-MfRQM#mk36^xoI1-%;nSE$ z`HnfWLi7rs#XRz`p{G98nR&`X37x!v7`cq0F&aW!(gZ7O2VEM%(>Wnv} zK~f^=H*!DDWlUiCzb+hFCBFrjSBB&>cpOV(IgC#|Gh!DMNy(F?|B<{u&xi3`E{Dri zI2?VeXi`D>EM8~0aXI4}nWyH{ev2uVppC({LZsiq@(GM4mS2{<#$4Q5P+rG!Mn)^k zSG)E1))JP2@^QSbOJz)9`KG!jT}t{FlsB-PJ7X5hr`*{a>}o0~pUCUwR7TeyWxRdD z?w2g(RZ!lY<$M^uSpIxQv7)6t3d(!(z9oy%!t(u6Zf`4NEGVDD`#QW2pTzPNnhl>` zRy@@cec5(V{_Xdx87yD-$;mb4#GtRr)4mkHvxfK4b;&YbQcB~56Ke*IWHYN% z#|IOazus+D?}qO(dyKV3?>!%_QKb?#r8Hh9GLQCKW`}=Ehg4~U%H#JyQ2uz% zU+VkO&Y5=Q>pUv{QYr78%RJ_#;+2k9Mfq`KK9$ioamQaSivO8> zAMtG%I^vf?3h&80)|Mp_kvab{g}sk^1`E| zpQ--mvi&%g`|;D(mkjJ5wKHc~6}Imw>-lq(IXH~}tF<%i7gAY|kIS%Mb>qtIBpGTa zS$rS+iB~tzcUH(xVI>Z% zKY>_piIYq^&{VfmT0F3AWqn{ZW=0BGIdRyB@C6Xa2k@Ods|2E2eE!n&5R>{Qt<0;7(nEzP*ewqCi*Z6|+ z1?E4Ne|M)x-BNJ{?Tpl~_Qg7O9CKbB8zymVT5_k!{T=0BG2Jm&B>72FES7nuK8J~20Ev6~^k zJe^Bm{zE^cny2@eJhnMz%MS3_v8}zGkhd@YG28GpFUIm@q4(C z!~2|)7r%cpUdA=I)8659@8`#bzK&V?xAra&<<;;r*YDR7TX(*4y7OL-(Ollaoq0UJ zt?Xa>a^N-NchK*{Job+(r!0$^HvcCvLdf>-LjMsL5IG69dw<##F73y&zSxB;_C)@< z3x4WT_&(y?HZ3>b_h0b+iwu@qmH2j{v#YeN)j!|I_anA9*>+X=euT5@7HQu!QR2Bv zRsEFjFF1QJkM9>u_IuJ#`F?@33FW_$9;yhonPa?^XYJ%TzS z-op3Yf01^V7rwMsd5_%LhwuAOk$mLcGY6FSyq!as$9vc-52W=`-oti|NBOC;ykU%f zs`8$+b27>^U-eR4igb>Oc?1NFdrxmkuN$FI7(( z>&cwIZO7iZnb9Oc{-8V%dTf83O~{d+Y%XuuD&q_<(SL)_x_C3`5xm}m?_>U%-eBMp z;^-2*vx#}UCtb95_x8fRb_sm%??ch=0Cee~{0M;5XUk6l>;1jH*Qb5W%|l5c`IE-? zVdGl8&JQ$Wl6ST+pT%hT@V*hTi+Z!Y|43!T`CVb-HW~Mw=LzYm9(<4AgLxPa{fRA|ctQUMD-iOPDFuok)_6&7FypHe3Gd?L)ay&1U_h>&*Ddd;HAx#0woZo<58IqBEw- z{CF|)eFqbNM$B|y=r0n&_whZJ7m=B^?^B6!s!$TQw{*5|W%>RKC-=czLAvPD))|HJ z_rD~?4`KVg>#Q#3fC#B2f804-zT>{0@q7 zcUkh{^uSrU(1Yg?KNio3=~UV?TUzu z85A85^D%8IL!(8VM@C17s$aGjQlvkH^=2>*uI2ru+o3xpNQvO}t~>JQcihSYGc*Hs z9raR|4xBbbs?M zr<()b&`r{V`T(M@MB|T)2|3b}%H=Z|`^|H2cJ;|0-lT`()$Nq=Vmuo$v8k;_$PV-Z z(Puj;6{q^^#rj%T9K1O8>ka|16TXq<@v$ z|8u0)!YAJ{ulMKs@YN9XhuGE0i{i2}4}VM(nvI4m@vh7#G5$WSZB@idd@{$8#{BH> zFXbCIEnM$e%vac5d=c6Vl}A4C`w-PvZuuJdQ2hgcwb8Kgs(;4aGHx%%+oAPu|C@jQ z%#ZQ(KZv$O`gMHY%J^HWm_6td#Cx#+Nz7OF8~Z2vj_~8Xe!TOe~P;X=x&&hzrnEbb~hwNe8@ngNg z6XPewrdeK4F|rqLXK#L-^Fi1XymK=1$V0goC?QSO+0>23i>-_#D%H)eYhO-Uvl4BUe)i;dItH=XVE-Ff1|rAzI#=ai%mxdXzOY&5pK zIplJAw=|g-SO2yf6PM_(kp%he#rK6y?HY7aOM?jrIDloNvX7^GeI&nxANAK(sgSNON$owoB3M*w#Ps ztS7yg=gB1F#d)NP;zfBN^h5^dy?IFSrf~TTM%TeFHh#N(#WK<(czrJ4M-1muGuIMF z7scy#K;{GS)GA&054B!HxV$IJ?JV0pq>L=C`H8*{#8?p%8Z?R)YAmV&`HOX59P6vJ zx8p9?_#V?pfc#D7`|#K7+Yi$W?LTeLNl0Fs|5^TU;zguLiwpBzF7sor{?u5F%Qhb~ z-+$DCzOYGoaXl#W;=!1ezVt2}As+LwiTTMD&fHPwJIu!x=KY=P7sY%m?7Vkf7ZDj@ zrr7ABd|_Re!g}UMRlD8!z?^TG*Jtv5wC8QtHfwuo=ACnyM|++%W%*<^&IIP&4#{}y z9R4H@iKIBwIX|AvJH9+y5^a)rKfaIl)72Qa2W^1(IOfrQ=C1nN4{e3=fW8C7A}$~( zs8fV_cx*seXpDVBqP$?9O=bP!X;f0b__)3H+Cy2s=G~Tt1F5^n;F9pFR5e5$Pd+llVUBF=Ft( z9>mclc;__cQIBbZ-`IXHhWx->0>s=y=M5qzbs10k971?}(;bmjUPae-NL- z_tCD(hF?oo+hqpxXjixYyjC3TlJbGM2Z*^a%uG8+`7a(yQa%u;Yr4$GjQjV#pH(7M zd%Z{SdN00@`gyUw`X_2W{Fz7noM>?>-?@mDd4Hbg+SQKsM?T13#0~`K(=&FkV#nrZ z8tWT1@sqO=e?GiNGXJF~#7<8(mp2@h@&578@gI`Ae%ONasLx;Ue1Yy$9z0my#8^7E za8=^yqIwJA`^ZDsOGn%9Y!V-D$KQX{^P$>qlI{3;r6=D(-=z33b^tNfP&-$1#s1jx zmCbsMHwKni*LvMd=JjsB$@o#PYdv+^ck2+3C-aD>%&I?!2tTxo{DFNS+93IZl#94+ z{Vk65RqE~AwN{@P{H}~XiSI-A%P*%aWivX;n;-LOj0xrz9%|mwIle6B2i4xt4Q+`0 zM7sil3k=A6@I-!Ehsk^xk4Y@^=Z|NDwv@4uFM`+m@O|W~uyJg@`6h&US!QvosF!X4XKMgE{{GV6`W>fHQY*z!a0CzJ0(Zu5eFx~O@JXFiv4VI%iW zYTn$A%Q$h~7*WIbC~`x2*Ks*dmYY#1qZM*UJj&xd^Yra)b=C5ITrQ4rcGqcZ)p0C| z`(YyUn}+|~3vGz{i8U{!|%Hv!tv}*Z{pbZ=c#v zD=hvYf83c*WL*5)&EBw0{$M=>#GWZScJLsvRusz&IiEo%+qL35cuGdtiU& z^{%I6{P1gEpMZ4eAiq4A_vC!d&pI+ettS)namDf zaiRYMF%D?I2hH;{p4m{I6WCq~aN#8|%lSdG_}vrdFpSDzck zMYDh0o=Ur~Pem-`e;Sud4EUe|+8Oai z?7P|iW!Lb0?@f529NT|lcsfnBZ)Dz|F=K1Sbc|J`KZ*UbG9Qt3EmeIkn#1e4B>RIukW5*G59}HwW`VhX4bEb;btaYJ*>M5RiJU1P?;n*m8l?u})0sy<^ndwR9j83rmdC6v(!Z4PM`!PO9jSfY{=e!Y0!|84<8(hO z_4M}M<-6hO#OWj^cs>69EPVf?rSlD_AU`c!4)2v#ZT@qd zY>2+R`;Dh|UZv%O?_*zJo$H7#y^i9sGLL$1e(zL}u&-UjC)x3p4Cnfy4HBPb$L~Hd z|5LP8iUVUE5Ocn^FHmA3gF>GzFS_$Gt~=cyS3CB1jmgaGJ@`J>xiM|_*U_An<(*B; zBc5k>!~a1%ulZah@JY<$y|aWE=O*P#W;SNtF^%~KbVFRf9a#8Ng$I|k^_0-B z$KQ2D`7DO<%HK|Z zl%Yu@Rlk*ad=DUQ>r+=nzjG4v_#VLB^Ec-D=%b|FXCo;$QTA{Z!RI-E6M^%MwGrtguD( z5BgC*1GQ7l{-|VNAzktf1?97NT?Tm%mXFOnms8ACP#*p#@%ZA;^8IJb|D(89L3w-s6IkB0*R;ANJPOL& z`=7@0&1PMAQ_@&a-roNlmd~}U`oz_>pnMv~i@%?0yejjP{^_05v=>$LPwy)w*o_Y+ zmKUNr8lUj@mNB1x-M>)>;^?CGmBjM+o{?Xzg%=%?G+N`+m`A&roLT#ti^6BY-ZJTD z$t87D3Mstqn!Jzp-KkO0j|>WLWFF(su<8d^6jpdI<}v;ZJD#w(h{F3bkN&qh(78=f zg|{+~{u6y^cE4f@pTs=Im&n&Y6)CRpY0P7MS+Mm=Y6*qUVjknm@8Napm1JJj)qB7H zEB|hCWK^f1yzl6U`mn8!jMrt}I{h=XYj=H%K%KaVH}QS^4%h9Ff#X{?KeHUXg?aoA zSF6mJx)+)@{|9^m^Y|UE8N;W!ZLA&V&b(s^^O#TX+`aMouv<->GdX0y{@2pKtq*sa zo?RcTJ(?u{a+t?_I(^OEy$kB!T?_rLS+ZOsx*@K1PY$HJKH2C=|Nr0lG6%gcUnbU@ z_*=WAxjt`f`!g%wN4`QA_0+Ggvwb|-BY%^aN4|Pr`###^&)>DRJn?DFBVV8Pj{fO# za)0fNL-7BPu`dsd@%rAMNoJCXSYjVb8MTc)T53==)G{by9~23~Sd$WrJt%_GR4vnw zme@lrv6Mj(wWX-W(u%EOk3FT@p_bo!=00cKc@zD8-#=Wr&vVW_=iGCb_nmhM$OO*u zI&}Z*H6O13<1p*jTowNE{^Q>4?;oCuzWbbU6L5}KwT;g9d*>fv`vR=M>ym(S%=q@* z5lyZh=t}=r+V`zb{2b%JV1qj#g;0UVL!QUi>XUP(1WI_sLSbJLcsn0n*`$+jUY~e= z7<{1f#DFBPdT;xgkmK?B`~9%CffAkyTyssdGs=9qre4x-LOqYKIQ#tLK@x5S&f{y= z;$2IEfh+4zP$cWex)TY0!>_E@c%Bi~de^I(xQ^2eH zN7TPz@Q>P8udkWl{n_i`Zv|EQh|lX2udkZxA}$Tv{-P@s??1m2U%ftsgMXm!55wu# z0cFhi4&tlVr%3P%ws2H05}A{)UY`=d|7URjz@ia3`D{P0uc_d_2uhe(%$k$0wm%#E znx>=UiihXqtL-=45b+7UR*ezu6H927ex!qNKA++Dq2C>A@5iPyS|5_H&+vP6 z!fy%xzILCV6%g@8fA&C8&+>)$B%P7vV1q1{CH)b=Q&3)Y zzI5s&ob_{j?v`FSQP!UgIganSg#I06{prBNZVNwp_N}&6FX;~h9uB-&%oJmggme7a z|Fr4NSIPc!{9_@%|BrwNvVDoD=lC=^bfc7PUkY&cFTGBMS+f6pK9dgK&JB&1%Jy^n z{QiUUrbmlmrO%uU;_u#OJ>gyrOd>U-Vc*#bY0)FbG+xh9e$?`#b)}Ic3CioxyU=PbmkK?56DqC#b=~xLf$OqS&+V;p9q!j z{j1)MrcyU(_~7QBDeos88XG+V6!O>id`JZJt&Q0}|MLb*>Jx|J6_0vFxA*w<)44z6 zzl7_Pfb)31@^H>7+1^y(5y<0HCtHNc{gnxv`*V-J>3!}mrOmfK=Q6y%^2RI}LVj>w zneL0Yj9m5avGWbuZX=3(Ukv}gLG|RH4SWa6laC8EA&d_4FCO)=$hXUbyPuK!I|(@F z!<>dM=F0ue@0a5J?X^e6s%ay=>b?4TzRQH3Cs)gj4Ulln1K|(r*EjxjLZF13fO9_e z?^WHZlW<-ydH>#O#=?XA{y_4N*UL!gS$(!y$$(gm_aL0tOO_v4zMET?Pl6o#7jwRD zAz3~ZIFF}iu{-MqO8Vo0XQJFZ`gvWQgtLD3@1eGSh^*iAP{fDFThO>RQ)T@c;8v6c zUR}Pfhklw5`TH4Gwi7%<{k*Y3h@*&x*#Gl<%lQxw{tq233pj6?Pw`7dzovlq)%F*I zdA!Q`#p_*Y%_Bi_erX>0`**w0!6R~hasP7s&;0Y=ZaKfWf346{Y|z0!<^1CQW%da^D*$(+e(+s2V9P)dx>Z#7QDz`qCNSo zUNyddh|lAJ_cw{)*V277tU$Pr>iv(bpZ7PZ;E$`jWp&s@^q6j$pPq8;wnM#nZ> z)xti)`F)FNklR@QqrU=xD>l9Legof+gj<4V5z)`v*wk4Kp`>E5aU*h_8EL41C% z0ne97;J5vF$v-@A3%0P20W4RM+UO%oHW*4+oFmCzl9*VDRlSK{>~N zFke6MjeqdxU0Aw0*pyR0zkeqS<0c#Ytrb4|hTm(!Qe;n#@&C7o-%p<=Obt>RvS%!avJm<-wzNZQX#0m{0ZwAhJzH9dL0`fkH^MmvJN<_Tx{oo|e zdCl@aEoo3U!1_kN1NswC9@KwUDG<04_nZ}3_i?&2Jyd-cNEKRMqY*%j=k8m+!lUiIC&>JeD&4ur|O*THhS9KF+)K z|4taGH3^R5!&}!q#~U?@A8*zx&2!;L$`8M`J>0FC_sXV%>(b4lp5roekdaZw{W+qF)Jj0B64kyO)OqNI3tFkpNz$3-1^LB|I7R{G52P)WmmnZ*bpwn_>`l zdI}^pxi|PpL$ZM1@`)CJvvDF=Q_29S#wS5mW{Q&ZXCXdr z@XWEo-a3CxE|bf63^s$GhB6Cs_ur{8JD2h3%gapUrSXN(Z_0D!f4Pju;PAl$PXXTs z{^Ikkp5{^VnDdA{@Y+9H@cBKAPVny)`Z6n2*=)&t8h2?JkNlp}WbjF!(qFn1o6yJa z2mS2Ej@P_tqyF@O&;3?;Mc5pzouoy+7+(r`-oN}jFn`Mc3AX^}d|ch#{%xRy+kx|V zn04fScO7uWm$%-hICAW;VZsWp9lq->F6g_oFtK6VUM0@MPF*VM`MOJ7SmKA0ygm~+ z-=Fc+RLk#s<~H;{$6?C5o@es)IMXW;2liuO1=FU02+;z?Q3KqHGIRbxJ@3N^k3>Dk z$^J*d3A`^NJRUfYyS*!a^L+=Aa3|XjUi;bo{|=Jk$omE^dH*mfmZKoz=opXwgq~5( z_?6#htqnsQ1LKzp+>N}gpZ%;`0F)|r1aQ6iwcrhY*tegui}xP1KG;yt`3Ai@1L_?p zXT4kgsho!rb#*T5yzhEBUth@t ze|#7Bzv^|~+dsg=G&M?3Qu*^BTIz*o`0?`#=tC{c6eaQbyS6-UrGuZEuX?Gx=A3->yrt0! zzlZ)2GB%≤)GMubQ{Q!GGRr(A4~@d5iLd=Ph|YqxX$v@O%V$&gVq@E%TLqg*F-W zIQcjr7ry%aosr=87`$+Qpo&lPyfKd$Z#>T@f=_lR&$(;eu(R1GeP;$B zNEGKx@Z`8D{_E@=g+34PD!&h~!X=u!~x`;@lddjEaYfH?o)34K0$JTwrxqlMDkDFKY zN4kGiK4|<}z~}u=D)_y=c;vl*RpwLwC1HGIgZKPy`FnXCf<^k&_L_o4JeGAh@mD^q zW31E5SJ`U?f60+XmGfg<%Y3!HvEV-%GBu-sYCR)+<6&3=j2^Zd=@km_l@ zOU3*f0eN1x;_gG%9wuwhv4a@%2Tm{6d^GguRX@sE-H!D)~K`8yCp(nmockmfw1|$4|1n z2{^~6Y;4ur@_BjK6o30-kDgs6>yK3F|KXE%&1C&n;PEI|Rb2E~IBA{HV*b_46YZx0FIhX-5hUSZ)BNr0S>)(G**;CEzyBTE7{|%>nSitZ`$un#ll`{> zXZsJWntRXBe%KWWUdHpGQ-fh2jaR--$MKH`Z{K?p3K~paH+}yQU!9Lh;2-O8#SntL zWdY)=^D!O#ftH{hw1#rtkqnJjbv{x(jn^d3%e*39{C?_i{4MLD@oGao$t&1fe{UEX zJ$zuCgIM1F^u4Dl0rJ)Qyfg5Kq5W0hx)jv&{ql1YLh5*hg}m=~B3>_+tm^lQ=Lj0_ z>5$JxdF92;zj^K%&cf^lN@Y4l(H_BEYxr(!`DOmK&VzE^l{U&`C=QYjL%lJ-@Gqc4n>s-f&ignE@MV7u{32Mw`F**3-hcDTH}&Oy z;P>S+9?`VHHuja;cS5fVWtXqc+?VaQqu!13`x=&ty!?|1lE@&Qxyw4%qiei#dgI5c@DeCE-Vg)PWc1=m?o&(~kJ%pd99TLafe0_S{uwS3Yc zjsw}j|L2lpFaWWH9-kda(DzQWoyPbDTfN(M@|S<#;CAZP`R60n>BS*uL_E@ucWcT% z6K)6-{_#9l^x;1d!I)2I9!XRAVFv$q=f)!(cQ%>y#e;7HFaMgnYdQXebN@Jjhi^UC ziTCt`^Y3=-PxDKT?y^5_$gw|>0oVG<{;(gZW5hTZxxHaG9sKd?A1UfR(DSqN{xH3S z8w-kf@O%Bbo?l%r=s)6N0ss1hPn&Q~$??cQJ9hA<-7d70<0i)=0r=!UTDUo0lqWp4 zx#Y3XF2*-4P(J$dBn^6Yg&wb0Ds|Q^s#CZqjW;0-H%QrfTI5vN4ppY5_H@i`~y_aJ{$fbZW~ zD~QicX+ISf>TiEKc<@ip&r|TcQ0eC4ksN2Q{e^{Jtbg&kfN0kLU;QxR&1Z@H`XK`P z+E#tpveD-ovpLRA)bqU2b6#Vc9A_7BK99MT`tNb>GqTeS+=6&mPYP`Pz_Rq=saUOX7!UVtfUAchs{BgLNWrWmEI{Ul+{X9-TH%Ce7UVk-Gg%b2H*~qbH3YKQ0~vnBL4lk@Smu0vVX~t zV>_SsANf?aF9CQO$}00l1af~;fAe^XMZP&F|CP+KB-~J3_+^HCJ=62qvVU2qH-lI6 zVQY&t9`r`U)doC$@WqKdZ;*Zq^2`Bzu&wN{+{Po%|1-xsW=QeTCqph4^V!EyBfe$- zD9?C3;F8x$$D4HZ<{A5(1$`Go+P<7vC4YI&SC;3J^$d&U-VpnA&ew3Gh}+kfGR%)w zSKmY|%2zw;xxMvqjsIp1-gsl4=kuP0o$h*qO@cwV6Y?&U5A+{gFi1GdalS4NTHH}5 z;he7-kPrVeTC10E59&Ezzn;+I?;r_x12>is{tdX2KPE)NlaUW>$AYM%J+%^Uft(#> zXw;{rjuLP~f!R3Pbz6&vJpkAaF^4em{@~M{fHwH~49_mOte@V?M<< z4gH@5-m89Xw&Vvv>9e<<2MvuL;M;I0dbF8y#kjSU6miP?;(90hF7pCXrQo_q)N>xR zPu+e+wj&-m=XJI8gjQ1C>r&eI&kI_+`2yO9%8gEsqNx!(8&5F=Eg_2RkDB zp(!Q&D0E_V>dPt*zG6SjsAoS`uBiQkY=;dv&#&7S<~t$Jue{%7Kfm78f3@VNJ^}LV z$LPc7AF&_QUk>2OD4+GeY?bF9o)_KN54116_h}u6k#vPDj`y1UF{H<)i4R`{|xI)@K^8Cr|J237h zo?ZS**3a=}`^GhC(^bZ^RQe--E73{Tp9b9Uj)+6zgKIl^+$izUrKs+IxgL_)Pwsy+ z(cpBoH0KCQT)t=*YgT|3Q6ZxGCe8`x8z9|R; z2sZ*x18)8B+_!W;E**p?@OTFv)Lb*w`y&x>5B7_Qoe@(c?)K*w6lzA3fJ7+virhcxfO86xqk^d%(N@ zu-PujK3#Zg|M*>A-K(4&e@i(LAGS|>w6sOG&kmg9*Sk-r|H<|_fpdKJ3@Z|zn|&_u z{uo=ZD%+>D^VU2Y5gj!$X1K6a@zZyHk^w!%Pe170bN`jv$TNLdynmc;OzZcp?1$-H z|2$}XpiCJ1q3k<+_itOlbljD4T#(eUV*9b0oO>7%I ztZ(#)k&Z#CeJR_X3cbIaAJ+SIy^h03C+XuhxMUlLMSCgUrYUaOkPj;_{Lkz$=|TL0 zZ<-T9!F3kY^LwD1_DwnM6&ASO4m=ThKC5+pt-K!d^9qb#>|OP&j5{IkLaD2^@CC2e zVvp~4DvpmCyrxr()i?*)3vax!KG?v! z+_r3KX+Pupjw`<}dDPg7;~k~>s49aiT-B!|J52FlAF8-@>i~n z>nO|fcwzaDdusI2n?w(geHOEb59fPGMSD7*Kj)V3cJNnxF|$@K_v7ctcPIF*Yc(0g zbHCjGM&QXPmp^UYQ{K;Kz^@G8m&c3^miF^{7jO^oy{#%e;yIN3%f#=-obPpetUE8~ z7k?+1^XvD&M^%#Z%U(sqhu8P7ZRHEf>pP#1Il*i5>C$n$zEk@y)N_7rIMk{r?~igD zk8bdfPG0*X_oEyy3-An-`>HhYy-(enZy2wJs>1Gf7maqw^Q#&4oDa7gWeUmXuY7&c z2402P=RCYtlYTqeW%-{b4Xr8XBgZ2F@@ILRZ%4&Z4hPe*?h z&UvHs+cTbfxa2u&n0H^^Y0&V2L!;xcaZ=jzy~o8+O~fPmcHF~lX5$AGQw7&qP|rEB z>UPLBIo@{QoIgbtjNZju^2Z6B`{PNUq<*qLF5n!m&;k!u$o-K8Ki%Lx`=NZWoc{)# z?>W5U+GjGnzTf5|b za01UnIk->Y5qX@mA0GHo`O26kvLB`z7{{0=W<6>Dg&b$TuFU)2Cr74z&3j6UQzGt< z;XJ5PWBY2hmGF4z&&K)afNtBf<#{9tIOjn}L-!T(xQPUwigM4DQwG_7E9x^*)=4&p z%KgB$a>;Ew-uyhFk^8|^Q^e!zL9_pP+`h>}inZd;TldwD5tX?+{PZ}Wr{lTM!=JTD zK1(EuhZDau@V=+=s_n&Oe^VgG>r>4&y0{>dXhMQLB7|i9HJznMMDn zIB*_w$$b&?mhYR!LSNT?zohKiGo{1-PfsUhfD9iglOr{CqC$2VCf9-VdjNXKEO-mDg$Z zkN6Sb^SqP={zpA~{>AGy^QrxGj2q*7B3{PblRJc(1cPvAK2gu(_Wk&?=jCzhU^$c_ z50~8L^_k@PekGRw@STVlSv~=B$td%Te)W$$5A*q98t|ce_MYW=j`U}tp63ni+`9|% z%l6~<7Q_3(k5RAO#|ucf8TB^kaecM;moVUz54@&u$!#mw75a?y+g*rp%je?`=&ial zrQ+iK;9gM63#)-^Y9j@R7Hop;Ic$^g#(eoUn>wi(GK0kc7wMJsE7@)8G4_mhE#wp4(qGzC{%&AAH{p zw`1Mi_Sre#?}K!HVM9Lh`LrAQ&To0TGMDpJ90}dPttX8=}Fu{X1+)ijpTj{Z8n$0-yW+1^K#K5c_8b&xJDY zt`BT%2h>r%=qJ$4*@<(I@GR8x^^cR+g16E8lj$IwpA+Q%`X}w|2D!h?ABZ@x z{KvhfU6b##wK0zI@yxZ%9xCZ~0Ox#3>ph}&UI{kzX{owjC#)J&vq^7 z69##UMrTMwKJfUoqyN$%_u%QzhQcQA8twI&{-Jr0O3;l z6LBe+ae8u5CZZ&}HLxoJyx0bfniZ3A?91YTw{6oV(|c2&!XbGJ_N__457s}b=iBlL zw`1R$3VcRdzKbQGpYG>X|DHh*{mv1N^Sw;SX)MAI!s&M#qx3h8H-1il-+Rr^MMaj} z`HT9wFvTw4zTJY~V~o9b+%NoBi+ZG=^znP4`23m6B3q98zOPGMI%IvOqGBH~;L94% zEd#p80N3&NKzY7gy!DS?y~09Xp9OzhP9gv8^V%P4K~VJTVhf6TuDh97X}T5%7w zE#l{7e^4faU%Sg3BVVVH`9?gKk^vsSZ{oy)JD2cC*mj(O} zYdstt%mWr;#8=150e=5M+pDPKMdO&`CC8EO%Xh&K7vy(Ytzv)Oxwh`lc|;?Bxm}i5*V`dS^@@MK--}{VUt`L&9c&lnYXa&ypSO$}GEmBA z9q$)eZ>!F6zL!vue40xBWykfGC3$@^@GO*PEdf?(Jm?JgU4r$emwlNm+h_hr#DVQg zbQLcv>o)+mq0DcXxtqrm`ESSh0qZaMNpu@oe}YQ?3TN5RW&O#(c|6C|Xx!P)emw8M z`d?~iK9==osq`PHGUKkSKMlB{vG8+Z)f;Cd`}GdsX5fE>w4A7u<`Wz0c|O@wt7RL# zg!6lY9pKH}v~fTXaLOmnS2>@&al`eHWXRobx6JpvGWB~Z>bYMotvey-jXqOl*H;rB z*Oua@*I0$W9M@D&9-HiU0_08L-5=IDZ!qkpb<2W$V!y56?MZ2>Hz@O@><{q`L&dz# z?L~rr_}G|5A;z5iWQ=1E%0%$(`Ip?wlgql2f_23Kek%Ah4i#J8dfra&(~Wj2V@f%c zxccU!uqGltbr;nxGcm9-Uq{keP|yBlP5$|mS6ImF?ZCOedv(uh%l%FL<^;}h{o~Q) zWR5HKJD>k?J}1ntbWF}?H{`kBlm8jIUC!qW;M_06_EwCS``rVa`{Dk3hg-`1?qdB- zh5rXr$Idpq>GvRYzgxiDwduswkevM_k(CxHLWq9N)W1ewa0Zp$^q^rQFXu zBDeY8Cr|qjwVfX5sb25k&$-x{<9R|;GvQzOyh-W2##0RFpng%?N%h|MU7(!^$g^xb z{+9iveTxhABv0cbMRi?rbDP^o38RC?R|fd}`|bb2w|&8VNw^0%-!J)7?cwvd&j~j+ z7k)9Gr^PS%_*yREzUSKxihg)B%y@(M6yEkni+T_69+Ce%WSQxl5B&3^%=oE$M07-aJdo%4Vf?P^HMAzd@cQ3E_|JJW zV#JX`0TRx?KU=`--~Ef-ffAlJOSI4Whg@H-*Gf2l&(aC`JZt~gMb_^^eHQdYPnlg= z*3a#`!Ta@}f1m5#=-0V$p2#upocu$A1_$})fgIa6=*zQpwQuBo_lFr9$+#ffpMmzBz{@9{T+Zih-uwXW0zR(T{ zwDH#av|bU!B@ze%(q81=qPy&-S0#ducPo3D)>$nCRzF5o9tZ=KH9<-PtRKiIxS*KeGX^|O2i zp!-)ko^p6FZ|={(UZ3C$;4FHL!NIq&(c2}b4r#^fm{~G@veD;i*TM%`{}?r&OMgh znkDP!alrF;|8q0PaGXg#EW&>rq?T>oP;NgQxCQg-zcVyz<@O_hbNku*Hjb9tw;?_* ztPh7>X-nliNL0yJdcVU)*}fFuoF|tymj7P1&xZXX@7sTFFf38-pKQpxuhdf@_jr^^>JPy+#ABOU)5BGd4+nGHTtX1iejQRkdX?AL$UMfbxuBYWtsjOL%c_50#k(4T+qb7T6zUI(dd zvdh#-#Dnd+*=(d+w#y2f^R3D`do?-VB7t+h)vMH?oSbiIXg40b5|I(x<^Hf95P8JU z<()iw_MY6|NsvoLdFRf{liXjFFX7Oi3B3D+Tjk|^ND4I@O&j|KIZ)l#f9ftp2y;wKCQ)m6K?Dx;=%Lmx>em$cdOc;c0cAfxqY5z zGthpga;g30yzr>xow0X*lI=5g75?))Tk_!SW^CVo7Q; z$a#^7dd`aqH~adn&zhZLJn(o6dvD4KdAy}Vp2u5jP2bJ(cuN7Ejq;OK)vw9(2>+i; zmR07oPoj~al;83AJvF==#?23_fBm9l**olq9rf(TZ#&-cdv4hYoc$;f@=Zb64;OIu zW9G(W1KUFR8OHJ`o1G1ABhMQdsE@?_v8`R95pw@q;J*jF9iNsiBj;BJ=bv5pccsAP zkvzVr|Jhb90}-1}asBZ>@BHbT2kg)jo_JuwvROSZ5Q+4#Ovz3l{P0Jzh5YArgiBse$p1Hf`z_OC zzcv>75>a;iX7!xkl0DuqD!48U_3YEfAAN9I_TLOV3uV!Xb)Rz1QoqF_K8Btm4mCl2k9YRvDZw!y+=BkGfj9r=w0-iv*N*Yz0Pc8D>;|t#6c?U*x#aN>HN5|u z6C60CwC5XF$#7BKe1lH)xGzaQ8|NW*;KR*JwsM~n?nFK7zxwM>pYooP@I=VF!25LT z#FyTi{)K;fGtTGTz=!>*FU9v?k$i?q|L9w`);!h-cVS)ifah7>_%9xlbe%$dy;HGz}v>2JDj>Q+5Z&c6c@pW0F5T(7<#iR!JIAWb~Dfvmcz@r;`*ryH zC48RJ{hvG4a``dthbM)VD|1n*lUR-bOBjUjKcYU|!&OohIFeuL=fpa?_ zZX2{b0Jt146L|3`ot?kC#m|olZ6dz>9zK4beG>RDYp=SjGci+?ivA#VeAB_do?fE{ z-$&0<#8<~x6Dj;lin=|R=6*T8%6y<)NPlxsKC9zRDE;22LA&A57l|?!rN3USHUae{ zuV6XuBjUBGTV-O1L(b1M$e;bXb-%1a3!{la@#gmx?iI1@YDKjs<^53tON*7yat@FDHTDX~?IggLu(^ ze#-we3;&xhMq~qZ`=&93JWODIG?%XJwX3KZ=NMl^!Vn%@O~mbv(_A5 z-t0o0_XZLL*V$3eaXoo`U_m*qPT(AmO07rc=lf{MPW~>73D^A#-0pE+8!7B0+zomD zZcFzHKk5P`oUemrfH&mtvC)AN?m@i+@5e0E^{Zz(33mZE_80!8p7+exJ2c*d;>7zv zE;(Mxc~bMw1daOBcb;U2o_s&HIB;g;*c75roZ?Zh==2^_icTMm{}QfG0?vM%8~$$B zz(~O$JQX{y z?fd2T1EGiebJ5YLO99{sw%1?175XAkUffZ)e;|0|Pa^8M-~XL(X1`9tQ-Je&_4ww~ zIK6~({?MAN(()rL50 zm1|}C<^%e_V!t+GfQT1AU-!RyGg^H!`*=9xvB3HHx?9&b?AzZhv-S}L(iO5ou&myxMx1bKk%f%JC+1Wc-TN; zzXsm}8s046N1cR+19vVLdQ4+mpVUiu1aO{z@~oI|50dcoRYER)g(&ZAsL@%M={4V* z?};k;nM3D1)dN@VYt_6XsG5gqK&i_y=;p}%7@Xhb6_&7kq4Gw?5 zYqY2^Cs4x8z!MPn=}(u>)JeDvIQxC(X~k`N;AD4M*qujHP&rKyqn+}d?M{IF-KsxK z)Jizpodi6!Xx(A~5}t~B?yvm)|Fj26cqZ^f#Qm$i9}d?^xMq;>o9+HJec@0&aI(8R z?Czz{x~DM-yJ_9FL!SxqR+Q`VKCK)SCU_9_?mHq7HwWyogMX=Q*4<#VC-ZH{j}-J* z0{DyCW$rN`t}@?*e2fL(4gRYWliv@?WTq&|{uJbY7I^89tJ>{m|2#SQL56QdzJ^22 zI9SB3@sWb1Leq2T_kB0oh;d{Czt{Z1=kliJM zF9&U|Ul2TMkADYZeFGQGI;D@y*`5>fJl|elu`e(vF=u;r@LVWo3{L7&2nd~`88Gezm`AMD4R;7vG`|59=A2*E`@t~JsuEhnkNS_#OZdC% zyiYms$`~DxOMhfRpJBL&OT=%b8_3@`w4k2*V_eLrF8qB%>MuKR-lqiLZL>`Orayh_ zd~Fdz&5c%;S)JBxSVDg)v*%miZxuCiwgw- zo?o?5GiK`~+z^X?#`Tb}Q%$<)fh+kF%0#}Fs{=Ibu6?@h@sUw1JB z=k@j8(xwmP>n=9nJl{8M)n%fzKKkbS_eIDx^Cq8u=|;waD|ehy5KT;!<#2 zz%uzf*@AkGM|AAKfIy5xSwF8ANl|ATX(QgWZ-=}S<@2xFtHp$AU$ zYXwta>c&@|6gF~eGhWFPtw+V!sV9l1DY)kiInV62OZpv2#f%c!cwO$@;FXHvXUw z7Z%C$Wd`KApIg88sC`f*TP{k{=LXM%(s}nxQ~5i9>UfyPhF7Ry?hV3e)WVSMfdg&*Er-;Xx_g@&x82t6q?*e=s+TTv)>MHjA zcE|@pGy#9he0mNj3H3yy>)XcsV%}pOKi^NdMWfebf}a`a&tpE9#OFh4CrC3^_(OF{ ze0|c+JFEhKJr2R&+8GdH*2Gt=GU48OTm5XSvsCq)Yv*k6~8=x0WoAe zwWhH9Xyd%6tA2L)m>T!s_oAxI8#$(-fZ9SfkA6ac3JR;(2G?4>q1hnJ>5R!S&eQ8tu{x z-LGy`x6gj??}Wd8aCCNw`p8`HZNA|WBXWNpD}G$@;bo!WPf;`HI5hl z{2o52B%dcRU-rj{{<+=q>Za^l-OCY2!F}f=eBQsyp3+8}Bs9qK*5<m>~SzKIq{1K=5Sy95sY} ziG~`+e>XoHOd4d|-BIApyB6NH?8J#lYCOJ}z%T#rdX*2Oqk@3@-q*qJ&q-deFHuXN za>)KWaUISLJHJ0V`162FFU|K4`IA0bw8PiAmY1GePMa+#gc~LbKl!|7ToL8F#1d`> z&hb06a!v{P`lt;!_vh>CKLzU~c?WRLpLcfdt)rLl1mL`{KN#5cWsrm?1Lu4#F>BkH zUq$Bh41E>CWp?@<_CW9CMP5v4MRQ*kS zCwP3lIt~2Q=C9_4rTbFD`yb-l!RPDp9`Hk+F56fzH7DPV@neCUd9sLKr6#-L3Z>-a zJHdCMw1YqNq`h0FU#*2L9BG_3j%Za`N5a^Y83V@XPf) zcd3LmC*P&wCxib>-6xw$hUet_-sb`yzyD@h_OXqna^ds-$;s_Z5&o|0P{mo=lv95= zzC&*V-va)!m?sr-*+1p@-QNNJq+gC)qWu%kb<`5=b1c~B@bCC8@C6>Aa~2l!8^14S zeY35@{m%cu=kaZ5yCBx@{BNr8kH@!p%)`k6HsL4DA72UnPFL!QpMcTj02l3VMPXK?-$-dol+rO&g?*{)P**t%LYg| zzqiB$-ti$nUJR6Q-Y4)n9lCz>Blel{CgF_8%Sg!o`)9@H0it=Y{|2kTS!QGKH`4(V zu1|s-+h6_Iv@EUEeyYm;1D9TYF54duJQL;W)6>kd{ruiZwtvI@)X8iMwXc~j;$uSj z?TbfII;nllJYl~Tc+2k7+?p`_URnh|FKOc^I!d1 zgM;i#g&fBx^iri!TB-d^;M~7`kM6lHx1R)DGeh`!ql9Cw>>tO6?Qi$&^JcQV3367H zk26C@%l=0~e)iRpTcce1X4tk0bA|xBc?K@3~v+OymdrcvWb^3GP3d$JF*m zg5UksJ41CC$J7=b#8=xN4}QH*L;ut(9NB)Fm(=!?9`efsxfGO{C<#~Qp#YEcH}S&@ z_>V)=B=NV<7Z8wzzuO;;JVSMBcJ-QDXk8xf_o;=+&kHkk>kZ z^L-!Pw*~F|?bW$etUm!b-xK}8#|JxXI@S9&g`qNbHuWd1U z#`8H_eD-Cj+K-v@ckStM@3&|DhFQY?a#W!l#U9+ecczKRbm|u~aDKloKaaJ1eT9m0 zpO7q#%h)NxUK`~4)$LI&=*_&XccMOGs^HaowxfQqgu8&J1OGLoXJgKH((h*ZX+nPG z;9Cvk@15}Xo!H*W1E={t$LfJR&kLJ0TQ3Gk?PmZt&K7YwcIw3>ey=LEZ$W(|zU#8| z!-7xvyCj6$foB45`SJRT^7lxbEI(7&|CM>vlzdYAE|v#gq*94X{5=wSk3};2lk+qM z=XY+%EwNQE$GJp(LI;f(b)Hi_t>b3s%YeKc@6`yKBm9^9nAUMK>PcR~-um9}PJ_lN zPjnE=n-{+8J`Tt?+4onC)rT5+*X;k&Gg74|5%MW07yn{=R^L|Sd$gm=Ks`U_Jh9#K zDPALl9eNLNzFzjx`a5UYN2ULC8SO;BaNWmyHrs91jQT zdAwa*vgEoP4>#l!z$-B-{4;sJZ~;#Sp4Gm7Z=Nq`-LoUk9FH{ce!cyBFXeQ?@9?gB zs`)+(d?I?|e?Y{a^;KxC_j@mfWuAx!+cV*0r8AN}L27&K;8$<)$5XXE-gQi6kFZ0z zz6&`gw}+B&TE|kQzsYXRd0{uldEJS_{dvDkapLoeY{;>HqhegodHy5abPzxFw9v=z zy$$*4(i*%NzK*vr?I z9u+HBTpKAg5N=IG9^k%#MaB1(36O9e=aJx*pFXWlpoGVxJ`&@7;E-{hgMm~0BhWtk zkp%v!k{`tyA~b#n+2cSS^Lg&jE$!b8vWO z-_8df;Ss3k@#koK;zoYpxm6| zlASl(7oJ`QNYu&gxzXNd zVFzq2irZHZh1%om2%NX$8h>_Ji+oVx?EAflpDQvf5dN=C7`0nHZ;*Y;O}yTNOYXX; zesQCshBnFN=`pVzzPQ+-e|6#318WS*_d6*gJNbDMw)59VJ4fecXA0!`ysS#Wa{mOt zA7R;l@5=^6^^1-}0Oj~;77D-5HhMkeSbWt4*yVfwF3;P6!!GRPcF1lUp9$cH zKHOc-V9Lo?_oo~Dufv8K`Mi*&y!vO0b)B!bXMrDlW<;+%3Q_LQFpVZ4h=rAs=2>#OVdT7o^3QdtKM8#BkYL>&i+*1*s%?Uy)TxUZ)+x|)Y za2H{8kR1-->}SJG`F-DkB0KoLFE081uW03F-?5z?%Igru3S~l{FYd|ETl4&T8#7y6 z^@fJ*$xzu-X2_B(RzUW6RQ4<{T%;Y_PIv-v;}YR-hSDC+gXs(K~lem*wq{ z<9^$;`FxU}Ja8w>r1&#j1q+UNV5T)^Mm-0y4dH^MoO-N1`aFOye3KTa&;Z(qG5 zjY1{+bP>V+746*zMCTC=RfeVtL*nA|8K~o@I@7$qqpsxEz7z7prgcA=Tl+5Hn-7J}l-swX z-i>nV$|rLr|MeO0D+BoNlb5IS98UgcpnpBUn=~Doz+>MVU(Wxf!v8+Mp3lp31mR(r zPb|P6jCwTBd$CnyNjJK0RCu1F3x{^z*!Zutmea{rm^c`;X^Se*c`WkJ0+=-X{F#_TAvu>a_R= z&I36fcHkK(>+CUoBxAv^~Uf=4_Z9$y}n{<7=7 zGRpDK0B&3^;!+}`%qA)S^!950{rlv@cdp3&Ylj^BKWOafA%6Y?XZt<~n%-CT-vZo) zGJM&y=5qe>_gz_jeEe@+WdGcd%RsrQ)i?k0no99A!#@x3Q}6fe$7?U)7UYR>h4Ax6 z-P1Su9F%Y#zr6l@c{Hq~?4KQSJiq*0d8gm|i7l9aI6f0^udOA^^ZMX|o@@Qy=`6=5 zzNE0r4SdeQ2$!56{JScTk85W%M!A1HkmK=H>t^{=eEpC7Gp-c+Ilj)o9vAp}ZEoYi z0{+@(*S^VZJg~oZ@cQ@sX;W_gCIJ8JSMxR5-wd`F_@K>md&=`s66Rwg;yNe)alieF zt(5R53-SjWd^JeUcV5ppp6~A&;gsWPUM1v{AwQ+dMz`F)0k{q2{fnJ0^LSC>{*2$v z!(|an7Rvi?M-Cbpr(8a1HN0QUuvq0Q%+b<3;@jsXK(G1Jf|oMNl&(b_rJr=EsOP?& zJ$lNglDyslJQL;PlQ(C{<0uXOXjTjVT0V9*lE;Y?aW?@!d92=Dd7Svh0oL0oP3ou0 z{Tc~5UWX^yA1sslRhJdvzmB~=Wvn3E9}oE?l+N|dYD)d0vsd?*ANom}QJbxDI9-=F>0heNmUdo=`G@cB9< z^RpoLdVEh;00#&Hq+fl%yK$|E*Xp82YXqwJd4;FC)7$Jtf%8$YjeW&g(U ze7_dWFKYY#%OC0o7xcSPZk!q9W!0jBF|UZLwi-__CGaEj%Qd?7_4n@r_qEU0Yf4?LG*!BP%=cc2f=#xq zC7J(qdfctVgEBnMwaLjM-h6*S-S2ALPVcijgWFF7&i5CL`sJ(o<*M#U1RjtDyf9TL z$AGw*ReSy2X)yg?nLFP4JX*|{;n5@HhmRD#953@aVOODY1@^^zj(T5l_Fwv9M+}Pj zFMUqv`>cDl7uTkRykh&5YcSq}OCDnbqZRv z>_L5sPT0@)J&&mI{)f60G=_rs$>2xo1>d+{l(l!fiqI$J8 z*>dvL_PW8pzg4>{zr~+V_8MSs7I;-6&O{dgkJ{(wlX!kKZV>)&sDCLT4D$wSCBAyT zvVec&R?F;yMrMkV`0Dx80sfXc#hMjT&8M`E@O-L_E#Kk2-iUe41$o}nq~ULwPrvJA zqMnq{IOV3e_K@6z$7TWPuLg2&Gm&HJfFV5yZaHX)oU*4 z*JnU4U;nPPqs`?233mhcpxk`q$?!l4H*OO89cV{0VPth3aK(;iyochF_j)33JQHcW zhwQH%dP_x5c$K%ozut_K{dHN;ZtBK3`FtiBa{PNhgATuZB45u>1J3?7?K|cxzMfC^ z@_fl9?_s3=@fj`KYuGI8d0nGU>g%RgUywtxy#~amSJN-kWP9z9V|zzdaAnK(I)Ssj zF{7ULV|$hH5o`hOLdnmC%zctKRiAUd3QmCkSt#9*yIA`qPs{er18j z&y`FnIq!OKF8oM5M{D6Yr--;z%U5!^`geHJ??PU2d~D#KGUxj##OnY10`YC&bN@TR zud`=M;XL6v`RecGCWGJSYVUEOrks5B_i{79f4O~nCAu$7$r0Z{_NeD4!xrK1qX$1; z%%@BiGN1N)iK_jc1$D9+%{O^MMKXBOgxs)uxRUE|Gi|%I_s}0O#}VxrvPq1v%f?mw@&Yz$<&_`Q~8YN`C~Y^EDZ~ zCX;Um8XQ6o|4V#zzNUfSa9_x<5IZwPNqlv_dceQ@?Xy~WZ2tXCe09E>w~4r&8a|^ek`Tyyl#Ib-pHme_?N}68Vfd`RaUigWv34My>p+e5Li2^VQ!@ zoyLKF$bvktr^fBVKbcSKX*lXBl9b00s{01(Ue4zep*)NQpYxzj#}n7I%J_r4?>!8O z;LRO)EKt5KlY)AFPtUIZ?Rv)7Wfc9s^OOkOPgeNQt75}@Zu3sf)IP75d|%?d-|txh ztls7|NQ9SJ_`~y3!ve=w%kz?Thlmfyb(phrb3?QwQT$?^S$?f?Gk>IJ&GN^>q|Ti`FhN?%1e&^*Yzdl+o130 znon!+bs6@R^sDD@C-^NJEW4N6^`&&xxJ{PqRq{X=-c95qUthY_xx%-cm$~)BfB8ds z<$-?VZV{IsTRf=6eh_X$J&&W$9+g`nU0?FyoR@#jx)2nI{#N9D*MCke_@D~)MfCma z<5$l)V4@f)xHcL3`TEZX^`n-D{F@lbcp7lN{*!0gtC?X3W4zZ=Nq-h_K0nK^D?9sk zz)0^MU=)AD9^n_yGd!QI7}n-I&o|T-9prBU+XK0P-+yb!-vg)ks_%bhefbP+<8#wz zhaM-&vTF*pl;0oZKzqr+!}@%7Py7#iGV+IUR|@<)mH zTd#kOjv6{D+IMC|Y|$UoM|7Bf6mfG-__$5g9S{3b9mR+5`{jIC^<})@b8k+_aXx%= zzWrZ;CXyE8%?{j!lJ~V2H~w^+&yxgO@D1R(Rs6eUr}gFgwj_Rz{>g&egS2_EK~`pp zlKja++>LvMzn|W(e?HhI@Z9>_2HvJL=L-IAHftq)Y0&2Yuic(6Plj0D=;P}zJb$>r zTe@<>r9A(KdDRX6+%iWBhvqV`s^^<5@Poe87V!Ph4})o5<@tvDogkW5Gk9LuC*s2M zstte3e41AyQBU#;_SW}p({mccp+kw6Z(o-L`Sm|$|1!Ms`ksuZq24@H%zM-3e|Njc zs>Y8Q&jOyI5qR)N#S=c>G0poO8q#mrFYGr32t2O*p6PpHwl0KxfEoDHkKXmxwd`1L z$sbkHBUrx;IL}WTE}V-m+v#x^#vQ{xGo6Y{Ka9<`d+3JZ@s-A(-6s?K& zGPu11A`TraTaU{7NPZrPe{Wtiq)lh`O|eHCf$Ppmc>ZH^@aLMn8+ZQ!e{>1Z%Q7pE z?m8^D?*N{R@{6OrPIymh5RWv*@f^nTi`Ab>=S9Bf9#-d)xzu9M|CW!vveOYM5mr4J%&t!fI^o{J&=zZRw zk#0Jaxa8PpW`e(_*X5?U?KADT&x(J?3_B$JB7I7~=`yrj;aAUp;2ysx;~{ox#GpXpmCta$HJp>8V@nmmf?2YY>Z;(NmG0`c2t zXV&<#wHnWCAn=ht6@BocM~98TeeLr;YyHM~4W;u{-#)fO=R!wFW?i{56V@f{N@M-8 zheiB&oftQ8i*8%vsRtQP1kUTkk>9U}E*>z~dwE^)KOhA-@8f>!*YJ3oyWJ0vypmgQ z{hrUr=(xB+!w359-zBoa8DZkTE|9|~m z)2ZTT8S8;X^iq6!NfOQ`k&Vx#5Dpu{$2A##o1ZGIr%~1 z;PZME54i(|n2Wjnt{JA{r-1)gktM0Q{jQmf@x%Hv!4FB+*2?X7%?RiZOA~%heZF|M z{JW;wUMqOtO)H(8+wYocdn3W0(06*j+@FI^sq><(>Dsp6dQszRy?|o`M?f>M1=5c;6iUYh0_48Je@0;TL_guiIWbBzP-8ZGT;=KZF z|I&puzhnDJzZ-HHC~tk-uOIJY2mKt zlQ59v?d3)L>|ge<|Hs&O2R2pxZ>McK*kP9)c2P!TSr9dVLfK)L9Y&$dhFw7*fJgz6 z3J66I!_u-O455HvkX4ZphESG-U3Sc)teYyKr{t&-~h-`cV!!c4S%z_|<$(0iK2OPSwj- zvKyry{wwG;W&Gn2c}V^}G|$ppfzQ=??ANAcm;H2#vm;S%$ zdG0*wu#88^DZv%^o(^&e`GM!vV?pou+r5};8PW^?**}s%cc(|6VGN+ang7h6{*JTP z)$1K2-W$UBEs3+gRO6Qgx$HlNnL972{l}a~`os4^?X#7?!S?Z#|M|X;o&b=}$xQ0;UC_))pd_)2~_2aYe_tyl@ai02LcFA^B)o&vo#)Gqkg0EA*hwdNJvSbdarI;UGkR$3n-}T8B zaa8(sNPFiQX@xxw&_x3OcIEF=)x5F-Hvk{>U9ZG&qmYp&IY>GTc-BPuBYWb{l0lSgZ&HiJAZxAp6}-&*W3D~8}y~R zy&B0gOr#g_NrPPdF&V$0X%|lM+CbnboR@%?5ASn^YkPsm0=EEvGB^BJUIVE9a$MxP zqjuT#lLFiLZS;1?JvOP@K=u>Wey%%Qpv(O-e;#$-<+&@}ap~Xl@9#b5`bF5Em`m1^ ze{NkPj47&IqxBsTbm+Lad zx6^N5eWAoRG#Pw$l-WxbD66hZ43O^xUZCQ@E$X_)9l$^8MVX=Mx`of3=>C#^*Q{|$ zr>YvLisEeUgFmyUgY8x4Nr7 zkKhC!?X$ht=CEp?6a2|jWFAb4I1#MscLS%NqdUyjQNO2u{pUGG@tj7FA#r}+q89mV z#eTBkr1alls~0~hr2TW3+e zF+=)abVtLcDt|)^Gq`WAj^A8|TOsFkqaSL&ZGH<}huc8k`NqN>f%BWN z-wfP|a!t?W_0;#!=~1saE$v)TJ#3l!9y$$hJ@8A-$9%%|tr-6T*R@8?W~?!xQ^PNm=ENiX)aRxZTu$ie_qXzs`7KaP5u?BFINQVWsmpv2k%7bj4`B1Yme~C+DzYn=3a>RoN8O}@pxqcf{rQlz| zxxSl7+ytEKw|xZ$E!=V7ek$-_3-Ae|!t*Eskh)&d1CPY~^PtJH-0FHM7UQ}Rbo=X! zG^*!83;um~v++N?-zV_28j_#>&0X#q zruyd!&|j&-zEq{XLp2xt{a;q4T$ma^2l(}%`}_Bf#d9k58&S{s@q_!Rk8>%w^|oAx z(Y`@l_Uuyavj*rN)3eJnCH~pt(x!Vmzb-=-ZCDB z1&)U<(8mRR`0Q=tp$)jsCG{i(PaLg|2Z?BZ=Fg~t+a4(EO>IiRcXyWTnb1aqpJ+cT zUf~pBK^04?vwc^=Bwj@1ND)kC0&!yv)9%5a=deaE^p%IU?slV)ORJH z=U5_t4Z z=^yh*8B_fLzD)i}pPF7vd&!-usPKp{T{coNFT9VT~H{WClK^|yW+ zKZ)%m_|pUU_k_gsRr#5RnV`#7{o-UbJ`q=>{mjF8m1|B`iFSz1kA!tq4dmkPb{pqsP%+8A{liK6|$tMvR}l{&AdVclUwJADwF{G}S-RPd#v zyw!KXbFO>DyvlLXjBy|nbYD$-_b}IABFDu~*lPq`#8nxWf11Bjoy$vsN28wSiw1Z7 zrfgorYkt=Y83&I0<0tMqrM7os0RPEugZ76h{3*aWuBQLmta-SCrvc}@lWW-}2lp3+ zeX+nZP?r6!e!F}Me-`RFFP}L-Y*2pS;{Dpmm{&OOnlTSVUX$_Y+U(T40($>*F>0Js zFfT-d{`tm(#|r9XeE6@R51fxIpr7qHd$bSt0sepRLM^p~Rh( zk8_OwRu3uL?rfRyz=PeuxxTfZbo3oE`so1j>oTR^T;KL9{Y9y%w;t9dZUD~p?Yh*C zlcSo~{hIPkz*mb3&u@9RTjiP^*Qbg9d+ZM;zE)Ite&s@|Eoj^Os`oq19-sg7{7TP3 zgWAOP9RB*HrygDr4-b#`XNTVSWAh#iJ(Z`js1))zhOy+B7dNVZpSU5t<0QBISCyx^ zA>;7F2g&1OzQ{RWPc=b2P@)wqhqylV=P?-t1Yzpn4u zzmvgtV&+fN)%_I>)~DS63S7Ut!1uq_@0y#^-@x^|9`)3}Hpi}gjHQSN-@{}C-FweF z6;bB}UT=}#y*z({I&WFQNBe&adz?d^x6Ht8D62Q0yhWW?xW1?S>RA&ysPbI_^6ULR zXR|8b0bFxS`akXQf?Vpn#Oqy-=$@0Ug+aIuemMbG3vcT>0u_HK41QGozQ4x`>E`MqQCK84omJu_VT=^qHq5Z^?N0Z zifb^kPrtYkQl|LVqu1AuEzld2qmg01_Cc1wgtb zPcnwW-iW)>Pp(hvcJDe<3?qa(iKNQu0x&(g|_+wB$KM=e^=_f(4xQ?+FlzL_l zE*RBl=yPvZ@$hStz{hxgo8xghT=B*;6?i<#X(2iCsr`)CNs&vW{52!j_fqZWbrS7= z)%d^z)&7Wkl8<=iv+sTP4~2i3&>IE1@4D7|qWBjYgL+<{IIf-8rrH+|oYyBydN1gr zjzdw9p9H#>_A7lkR|);;z*B*joL;Clb4K9&P8Z|TtJA_|s{Tychq86zWbgNom>=x- z5pEfW8B-2yWo`=j87*Wz^Z8M~clW9Bivb_+*VgS-X1>JeFs}|L33jAJ+hau|ynRMi<4fy4&k9Vr~XLwzn z3c44aORlATB5&AcEE$_ValM;!$oJS0WF08uq~iUt6!XQ#^3SxyD%2IKMc7;jsNgPlDdwGK|QbkFD|*?nb+UK zzEtRq2i?ZnU##JEx4<3rANad3I@HwR!b#wEd7(0fo@YWX z-=EPdec;C-7TJ@9{D{ZWf3EAJ8^0H)Rq%B1M}h9$jhlyuDmbtEVt`-kd2?@=f*bIi zF4~{-=Q_ny`;w?1_j?=saALM<^!0Zo9^DQRrjtv*cJmd`KUX zX@nm8I@#|MA+K!IvUc^}oA06?8|s~)i+Osc69tHNa{%Xfy`0cD$w(3>%3AJ5g!LJA1iS=_*)pj+ap8dYalX@1$UFdh)rGK=q+oNgY88d-f z!B0GX%Jh#^`)mRBH5&G@XA?n2K=7M^J5X-gJR^IAg7ZD8oFBS{^!I!3s3uGLuSfrz zmapJ0bzIQ{=RQ&Nq#hlz>tE}4L9Y>X#fQIBC5NKljC#%wM<0fD%&Fj+h`SYZ+NV|9 z=TdMR>M6hZwuRccTx2l!6rF!ao8esiD7cU=U27wBvJRs489lk|`O ziZ~lU7x|BjSI#R{I_C$Sz++HPKT8*1zq9~wVW&?YuET7&4vPohRr`a11&wdo>B7DS z&+#UKe$%5JQH2b&P?lo-k_`HcKc$@x(C<2bV{~EtoAegY^L&UK^i|6B%oC}5lRogg zgZ`P+)BX0%O58^ymxxO;_M1$g`)pI=8p?i}Z$D@#I>obpuaA$c)6Cn)J^Vg=IPjq< z8NHrp#~v0sJh<<<%9P@=pAG-jIO#&ImotECUC_(xiitm{QuWY4~cxDhy?8_qi-=i|%yU&I0rHUsB=+r@mdOI+_Up)2{V zz`5Vnt7)Sy`(ndBCT;`H{k9>49`0{8`kyGucL1M=_&ByN8e{+Lkaubp@z2D*0rPVC z`9j}>7zMYyPIVlS{&9aHa>B3wgqQ^?ah@O6|10T!jL6Z2`wK$85%or=#J~HqvnJH+ zWf$@Fo#Qrx?%;tH&B7Giih7=>P0LjzM>uei&w=M@ZJ=)vHtJLa`j^xu?d5q|2k6Qb z-4>G#bYee*?<>&&ccc8Ed4J&_!Xkm&!Owi0X`GlX9RkxyBNr9H$;ce5N;arSTGx}x(xQ*rihjizex@t%It_M4G^ zXhmarenP$;_3Ynm8&_Y=>t%uSyqFPm3z94QedpGUdiL+Uc{`m8*Gc(r>)%$;SNnRy zYF-~nYXAOi1KrHA4Ogh^6`s#^0)ITC^Evf8i05;OANaPip13EE{;36JENkL#@m#9s zP33*!hUxqF)sKje)A#c3V(Nz^=m#YX>F24p#0?wVf5dPP*nhabcf#xUSBU2i3_&u! zLY%mdo`k=@xthZX6*Ari*`6uDKWjgzJU}-1MAD>_H*A(?Skoq~F#B4v6q&^?Pd@w=IgUEKhGy?x~LGVj8o@UfD-lH#_>A`r4@hEV9Z{=?X?WK8>x91@qPTwl^R3*=pTe(9^wFK15@4txC6rl3B#x$F-UKdJwS!4Pps z1J37cMt!^c6=jNcj=}dwh%+Al8CS^5LfN3e;9hE6IgT-}s_2F$s^eIozL-!M$LNK@ zo!&N%MFEdT`Lny)M{I|;+5f-tGzD_fQ0A`l_aExG#{aXVF3+geZ&;&|Ln<=3GXB2% z4H03|kF)m{ogKCHmP3$<_K8M4+b8UYG3Nv(exiM1fivzl$G;odJ_1h+z+Y;*`t3`m z0B79Sp6j=b@%FYqa0~ixlDXmq_50{CEoI&qF%M)dNc$iR^N!%p0>26T(}MS=sPZGj zrQaOSCLCB%OqI`hg!1$DHTFWc``HsrF}}p8l4U9UP?E7Y$sG z_!b-ZQycEBdfOj3{Wv&w-Dr*l0_QkJ{oS85Il%acagooT6Q>>d^WW`5I+<-U-%_A2 z4dvyQJAPK}%|yKh_V(Ly%tJPei}b1J@2)w}^9yz>TQq zIAyAH=tK4XP8Q-|2Hm5MzZ_TY?*wW1{Bbt9f3xf3@CKvOtUmv2;N$+y_CFr5i+TNX z0OvgasABWq7z<&a3pmH&AvvZWQQK3KOZv_A=<3J%r|Nps3VuE4e*b)YPQUw4@XrW5 z&mWDZsOL8_IFA9J(*2f=-?MbwJ?y&<6U0FK1TZ7$b5){Dizr z%>NG1^{o~+hXE6~3F{j-@I22NE#_GbuRT~F>T=7tXj>m_=iOZJ$oItcA55Vdmb{-3 zm+1M5({Pc%gW~$W<+}+c$g8sN!hkPEx_BQU$clPCA2_wt`<2g)i|+t`v^L-z|02rI zJtQ#k6ZSfQv;8mMkFCe{7x9b0c{<{Z^Uala{^B?zrAc`%%F84DFP+-0huXglsAoQv zI`O{Wc_jn*O`v;Op#ThG2hTYQoa+i+FXVVJej4o*xE*|aeso6b zpdqS#PT;(LGyZkV?>k<6e$kJo#r|n=UZ%6VD4=mH+kr zE9O}X=u2D-o5)wz4&ZGT_f(twZqvyE32*??c2KO?6a zx8oEBJuc8Ky}qF}AytnXc$pJ3z0dav8iCWFh=MX6i(2o@t?K!M!aSwOw;0fAhU>j! z1m&2JXR*N7>^yh#ZT?t*U!U`;pQ@*RfF3*Oax61*+sJD#^*DeZeb6cPZF(|*UwyeR zM%Ck+MBz_lA?bJh@X`r1L5*7!@Q{W(tG!K+5qR4+&4X1v-T@E-Mck~Qn^q(<>1}$F zf$J?lKY5#;RNw_3Z7red;dyHzQ|QSA-PZ?JZ+x4cEZ_rPyzqP94D&!&SjHpjRiji@ z&t3|H9uw$3zgY1@LTcR1z^@is?0v7fpi%QJ5qRd5ZHH7nwA;JvSef*;xVeDW{B+C~RnHL$gC2dP^n1%6&NM=*9s}@6;S+g_$IqV_;PWd_-m2>H zUeH3I@Fxj$HCmi%@-{swz_ZVa^IOleeeA#s_S>{f)pL=;Jf+a%2Hl=3z0wJ({%DFw zf9J34pZ#rdiv<2;!k@n9n8oc*mc1_`TmF z8uA^$zl)u-M!lY6`?!D~KU?}9ujf?#n&Q&`UX8D{SFcy7Uk|)&F}+E>UWrHlG6J`2 z#{XMbX}?(HpBZ>Y-);YJ0Wb73|E$2T+wN(LDEv;yw*fCd>d67+{D?3A9KeTlYdz9? z@!*l6%69>8{nwrP#TEIqPg6qrf3}uucL@b&{Pe)jjjvguq=GX)jKF6Pt39fef-`<* z;3N9~`l(*Q89yuVxQ{zrEUnrt!#CKosFRS1w=szyt+cr$B zTu#C1pQa?*-@N_b@(ND-^}rLqFEF}-g0p`bf#2EMs9!||XMD`Sw-31aQJzZLkP zcax4)QgAcIHyiNK9SXW=c!$0B{^A1EFaJwP{~z``^Gg+l z-{(K@NkdL&ud3i|A0zP2+78#MDLCyj1Mjfw+$w{Db9}Y}AJE8h3&hbePyn2g+<7+E;60ReS zz+Xkr{@{HD*W-S#8F;R0ksYEHocx@>S}&gXt2+N#!DmCcy>@zd9fdyz`W?U%(mIUt zKCI}W5$((Oy>b35_2=3Ub^c7mb19nA(*IJrFZZkZ^{6*O{`@5apQ`>Dfz$q7k2cy> z|6JfRgKlr({RKaO{T@61;aJa-b3;Pk=AI3;9{q<5i0eI~|EM^ycngnTLELY!L2mor z2N#;AwD?32cyMh7>gnsH9o0@zhKNfRaQgM~qIJCLS7aF(5BjydZ;NWGUsmu(gRW(- zeL3nufsoI3q2Jrq4R6nO6Ml1z!IEo|KEo2!>uTTo#ZsVWz>@+0xY~a*n|?Y_&;8*K zR+MP3`so7B_Kyxaxt1{zc52GPPrNr^+UQ&LXp6x0z!|6eMN7V;#!1gOf^M26+AmJz zXB>YRc_W-Y3;Aa7Sy2Xs=bz0u2|N+@+kh8cZJ({?H}9iqV8>lupTcVXy1+;L`x;IE zQrCx?a?*eLcjvRk1N{60PW$t3&}?QNh<2ndmW=HnHiD=0_~F~bqi zwO?|L$dYTy-gpn*kp8bd6#nr&c+ur$JnOA06W*j!$0hJj8;^SC>6i{%=BxH50cW1h zwAP%(SPFkqfpb4>(eP6<8FPWB1J`4`i7C}_oH|ZNQa{Q$Vb2_De~m?+MO2XXPkyJc zlNYo?z6<-TQNT|$NPYPc91yq(cnt7M;e(HQ53zb^1n$PZbUg3^JBxj5RQQun&-du{ znKUPNeFabEzBcH>t@dsW6x^+mcBcc+y?0$qL*OERc<#@Ib9R}a%QOGwO7EZvT2Tmk zp8IovKBA(Oe{{i)uRm32#eao=Hqb?b?)cng8ykU6;PI&EdwS!ZZ(iBhC)!_Le$y&=67Yy9>F2-$cb~>6 zcogb+ZgYS4AGbGA@EG8HPT+8@g(sT=7xA>E{HVpC*qNebE-+8 zdv$A6SaZ;M@L&_y8Y!3eD9#ZodI~st7S{6{VB4N zj04YQ_I=eSTD>mhxl77FeD&WQ>bUCQxoW(h=lv3ACaXBl5hOy-`m&!~Q|Fx&)bqY- zwlWb3_mG-5*ACc;m_Q zUXkx0Kkn67s9vY@++_^#MPnWmP_NT@UyFFLE#D3G!?8}}efOh{uKTUSQX!Y;0{fkI z?NQ^&`%&qjYuF(4pc>C4)Mujfe1}uZFPhuJ zG20^sa*j^T`%*ox6OVe{f82X-dtSEZ+u9=u^q(z@_Pv+?ZS9c?Iz#G-2I{^G{mlS= zKh#lK^*0OkjK_#vjd!d5@|+;sJ70_7iE4XCS4O-bXGGr3P1N>`1N`AkWe~A)fn3YCL$JE)8@E+4}n4?aM z&b&L7+T(^QpZ$&U_nnyfp(>x_56`i@S~>Hf+Mgn;O20Y&?4R`SeKnu6pg$UPVfSAR z@be$_wEy4r%x_8@>|o#{RDvr z*IH1|^9k4)PCtiJ@Z!M_+x^49w`z0ZqWTOqTP?m zc_iO?AUp6= z;K{%%)@fN;JuhTOJ;%*CDP`mSf9Hjqpm&sO)s}kL?js$K5zO8q@g6jUVA&=x^JPQ~9*6+P^X7E{2)*3OYxw`)xh4Ie@d|HVL zht&ONj&q#HdYL-SRrB2iKAxAU`fKoHHQzNg(4Ng?UN^~qIFFj|JTH@ub;G*brnYK- zGlHMzWfn}BQCZb*2F~?~<8Di%s-NdqD8FckbvfmW`%L%QSe{bc&vHOso<+rcM+Ut8 zE}!(n3B23-aaV>h5Htx-tRMv{tBG?;mP2?|Jk@d)p&Bh)eiis=W{A*Jh>n41ipRx zg@S5(azES+{OkIHnO=txBrn5BFmYz<=I%=r48r;eM|P_}<1p z+%LBP&($?yrMm9oet9zR*2!bQ!<#46ud6Nn&$%x1EXNHYpZnDY;JxQmxTB62+>bT^cXaJjK^-r+A8i3%bKjsr z>Ucr>l7WBR=AT#UctHJj;GuPb@2leh^TP?e;>5by3L}Bl{Br}Zar)J*$hY9S_oe?o zA3NW&h=S981MrSxceYgTM@1n1Cg3wx9f(lxM=}2`z^8{)>8{?7^7#+^RFe&R)ca9v zA3N}^C3W-F`%%mfC-8C)SM*cwNAZ4&8~CE}#i#2P|7f2sTKd2D{?*#072KEqz^lAl zad{a9C%*~!F9$z4Tvox^|17{WToFH)Q*ho7NCv*Kf6}KO3eJ6LH|UnW_sxVT1?PS)_2)Pg-b~eRs3YUT{m{odll<<7>42M1?&w|Z z`$~#@?z>a|^hx2ds{G^t`K}&~5>)>z!0jmKwzr&lN0CqesQ=-sj9ArwJ@!4Re@C9I z+^T;1ud9pv@Am8iRlfoCR>)aui*BOIcf&3d=&pAeH&Bf)_nWD|=jD=9RsG4}V|=eW z`{hve+ktam_uk=wdsY1w;7*h$JO5orjX(EM6AMfK-Wg%~UY(zGAIN$O@}t4r0^`;E zbVIHIbVXll}wW7%?~ZyGr}mF#lSBf0NlUw6cO*fhPm+ojQA)-~CA7cHpD; zG_9}Rk94A*`>2z*4Q-&_k91%?kW1XX`C*#nk@P)+pV4t{-=00jH zuDcANo9NtEllLV-?zfN1?-`gtzazOvN#3U-W)5HR65Cv}Z%3 zdEvnd?f{<)WxlP83%3NWwr3>vD>WZUzpIWezo?a7mZhYeh_ zA$?*y;NrX8_JHrA3P^k}HR}(_=LVndV;Kj5d)CLnQOe)K4t^hy@9lZiv7{|X5PN=} z@*l1#S%ynUlQ43Gc#7Qnmq(6ozaSCvGqY}G|6%23?~+L9Nj)yllQUo6iywSReO}rD zKE79Q(aei`xKHD4FW|J(g}+}`A2vJ`Hn9-;Vu5Rn(*KsJ6_192K;YbOG5{~qG*2jf z^WeVkXPo`5ZaEQ;s-Kn4uPb|Eg%IJvgDl|V`z5w^81r3&D)qcWn81^P^ZgR{duElL z`(q97tvey#4!j|3I?$@m<&J+{_YR@LUng+-%W>dE^6W`$AFv90LL+o&ckopmH++=h zkI!FyeHo9=@t^Kxo2vE=#lrbP1s`w-~ZJfLq2Jb6?~&gpLy$dW9`5f zJLjGcfo|as`Lha0Ije{3t!!t3^E%WG{+=$rL@x)$1b@+Q|-FJNifEzD$TF zBERe}Y-=azM2Lj{d{3JJaxOmKQd#v+*HHRR`Ts6$<@X-?M8uWtdAZ#AU#ZJ0AN=e; z1)XsbYJ4rg({jr=boy%kL{&fgJMo++`!!OpkL}=Rf4^!NGDmG+z7Np}x(YGBH=}-! zo&UYB>3Q$$Cvm;|_vzVdP+ZG|5lAU-;ql8iPU$|8@%gK=^Tw&9D&DT(!L>1{XDmW4 zl-W)hA}(%|^p|$`$-An6YIi*NlTe zMm#cs*V(yygwl^g`F=&lEu>=VMpb{*r_yioyN~u?uJZFa+ZfO_P8fDi?HBQ==Xhjq zz9dEM7ks~B66g%wuH07pMJnp~e#KVdfBW69i2$CC@>H8MdUf9*nf?P`S>@UQb>F}M zJfe~Gvq$wd2h@E7_8X3aW%kTysQMoRKK9#A-yPYZ_FKLuoc!jtQ@g4BN#N(c_SkI0 z532D?EhO9Djec8gOF@IWZchb&I?CvgLz}Dd%|v|$-VfYi)4xO2_{IZ|Xe|AIH}}b+ zYW(PbWT)(z-uHSopQo(P6 z{1SE3yD9$p=EckCbd%Kj{DkT z9?OJ&j(bs{`+ASrw|}Sh_jLLTI(Kt-4>cb2R|kK3?5xvB?XM}|<2-XVarpr?A0jZ1 zus=-e7|XDljB2F z|Du8OKFF^1cO4x2M7(2xXBLy~?Ht$Vg)*M_zQe$E(uDVeE*)Q#_>IsZ>`MVZ*GUDI zotrpe`k0Hv(|~iGWUN;IuPV2`O#~jC0lWl^x|E#Qtmc?*-H4mfiCuF)x`b=9$Y^KOJI*Hw|tWPGAgR$9AlRd$6x7WK40w%#W@a{%}B zC*OPM5B9;4I*!k)K;mJZo4&JJ&nq3Hz9T?7ug1e^F5Bzd;s!U)P5B7StG4yL!~3kGxwg z9)4|X3mF&Y=f#j}Glg#P^U6oNFh6qqHvXe*dN1t7nSazjx_rztb$m;K{4|tJ9I3^# zEBxFSApa@b_9lw`p7*av`?63DUh&cC9N<^;GqRcqtGql>_9#5 zr=KeN_a%XepNO*yIP-e>?0X9+Q^+?Bmg9&^FUxz5FS=P?ePRW_R^LkcPo86amhp1S zD_;ZLh*GyNt%|xXF{7USpvK%S%LH1-q=P7?bY?Z4LJMBu1^q%}Lc5o4zcBynei>>&J=dY7UOin<;58n^ zaXD?3jOV5Um#ZASFrgCTX#qd`#gL##-ahiiGZ{F?ZGG={_0@6P4xI7WTfFSeY_Ii) znt(e|ezS4@Sbld(yocBJi?oaKv$#G1eY5lj-xl)7V|xp`MI8BFPF^?bTFdw>y?8g2 z_m>2%_=$E&gWMRzd|%_tk)vjNdKcz3S8`y znUudp9Fnifct`h@<=^X8tYB=#I1`C_;#TngRIuGz_9G!%{KP(8Y{2!sEkK_O?^&n3 zPC1PusLxaW!!9MZ>g@jD_;s)D}P>wvJng(zwjcBH z+b{c6R@c>L@Nt}7_Ux0CTOpk#~%y(bTXVo)#nU%$`G z{FTfDuDfQq9jj~pxM+g&dl z8*Ke=dgo${2cTbGeDGJnHh+4N$9#?`vc2?sYPX`1A)phu8*w)-k@BqPs_hA~OF4e_ zEt5FUcMUtU{DWZUoBEs+BwgZiSHj z-xb4yk3=YV3UKC2j@>WrWK-}o;LM|OPW$rg3Z4O+>-YK#J}jL>!Lxv~UphCAznxRT zBRfj}*{=)!_-<4#1-GCbqd~X$pRf;d0~hU`^0~~vB*Zxubno?=5uGQXy#;+D=&fka zM9`0}I5tS<(D?lXeJtqXAwL!L;i-G$@*?lZBF9g;li#GzLjTM}zmEp}-qPCX1*~tW@qL>l&}X2G+1Wg{Sb%;(Z-D$5+TB_D7r%Y#Z^b!luzB$K7*&1@)%yBIV z?PdbKW5w}Yxgl4j=eWjk&F@MQ4K@}wzDXZA zt{Fg|ULbg1q~T5az;Vb7`unvWGXAi8D4w2K`-dUIHd0({a44K7)`h)1>;B>N?y~Gj(@W>LXN86vrZ0=Rq93m zOmyw^f+J&+l6>eowFEc}iQn z?Hi!KWaEevs{BO6pW}bljGnEzZt(J>{oRoBa>zfWxLy#ru9x(W`EmAC@AV<*$D)4) zwyy#7Z5QU%FwQa>vOS!%7jy|pzt&OW9jeFqCFXkrW5qkFzc%nOpG&Uzuz~8Y6}SUs z?opkGsqu87p6$`BNu|}{O1zU{pQg9;yJpGvA|iml&0js}ZVhi+g8NSN_igk>(EpVC zOeO9)kY0>0f%z;jk>^h2sRjHtlmZv~ENRN$o_PJ|_ubkJ>*@Jy#R$*#YQvs<`Lw5< zgX}>v&od!sbHAPsMt!)&JL7n8ZDb!A54OeAsJPFCZt)X&lJZdUM}uxc>GvO#R^Ucl z=Myiz>RY#p^F5S_;NSaBo$J9;ypXR=ZRp<*tIn`=0W9@{FAZhICsi{-Ui16jn??Cc zBOm$pI)r^0;LAd}^}}OXT7^Fr^^tKh4w++S+z5S*Yi-f~_Pr>7Xq#$ZH27js4oxWZ zPMDA1vyT=qjwOOlka*(spWi_r;cHK7^R|a?pF9n6UjF;u;CjWrS@pl<^-dUU={cgm z=g`O74Th#fKe$viySCY1=<5Oa!oJXzT z58l_~FLivfq27%0#V;ROI6evcA}adl;k{?K{PNHRKI$(t(ODx%FFg?UJAiBArJqgA z#@*_DC_U=gPFZa(?^5qGalT?ZRgBB`otg(`@Ef7$t8ZH!Rr+}-`v>h?RR7DfihaKC zo7*5~@aNt0v7N>GAsX>dLFoWp=1*~hct2TsE3Zc~k&m?31^Vx;PYVPr4@LWjT7m2O z%lP!z*(G;22oyNmm;RN~4Dj`Hk%u`z%aU`zusBP?uo3NEzwF&Z=aJ{@$5!Y|S)XI` z=27pp5MqS9T#(0-XGrP~8Imw^Nbk78aYKA(w}d>7^G?VcUv6MN{lHgFAx7Yu0n#t` zJ2Hl*XJL-(Ki^{qT#Tk?!s3BE%a9;1Xm^w$A-Ps@+)wquf!=N`0f)YFE- z_qWVZ{0WUMEBm8vpo~l2r5_}cR@lpZVB*ieY>`LB4d64Oe9>ly-}erp%K6LxsZ(4R zmEQusWRyn=AJ62x=Arw~?-{op@%r9{8V4ujEV|OZ`@Rjkz2{qm9Oey6=BIeSjpw=M z-Xr4rFf1A&FAH)a2g$e$TM;^IfAf4}1(65W#-QFK+xx5YdF6iiua{qgxThjt)>Lks z`0~fl`hrIACk61k$JF>v;SWs(&OEWjOpailc=$u(fv2PVV^PvD#!cXM*q;f!+XmAY zobNq0|5FgkSQfzFvY*EFX&E>Ajg<4q_4S{q!7?r{iZ(vDq|I9IHG}ZWjCzj_@6Xb# zZ)f~h_#J8mPQUbN*A}aOMF6*Py^gngPJ(r(&!?yE&JRQvS6Y2Uw{pM9a)$G96oSD;>E{M+Jg2L8>q&J`GUum7m0 ze=BYm@LMPFys`~+D>^K>uK4FWpX~s?tVqspIp=$P`p@qW4;%S<7m6qEOE`9o~N>R*h2(aQgA%z=n4j2Vnjlh5Sr>|BQBCnNlK!`7Lk< z_|qZZnDF7Re*OX1puDnm+c?!f%`oXV^>-RD+M13nJf`dn}o&y%Q{-DS6`SzYgfjcKeFeVftqh z^DGnfl>P3F^4`7;Jk$m}Vz`V)n+E#d*l&a#j0sD|aQMjHz2k-tPZ&mHJf$ZtK6_#y zZ)s|UQv1s4Z_=Jb)YG09t6knTN}xR{pbHyqX-0cQ-1%N;#;y3sUOOmD;A!B?K)LDQ zimy2ydHGSFg)(|plSsx^;G8cbN62{8J@@1}+d$yasHc7T6E~bz^Md^%7IfJ+G@8P^ z74f7kEa_V-C6FFHzV&bl)fy}&fjhmI)5&3t%W$gFQU0Vt2T9rcqRj9 zdyO4hr2*Sk;CA3_kET-^cT?NT37qjZo+#uwy&`{t-wmAYz3YHkqsCi9{iCIS*2F*K z*yja5^P2IlIH2<(=C#0?4}2fUl}h_gs`gtTm+jG|Y2!(%{U+eaDDO47l%H+l^*@0B zk*!!+ww=H^UzpME(MydjRsY=JryU17+RM4^2?>$%T66d;XNd z`_=JFGe-K){xtjjZhr60(*x)J&x8%1wB~s;q2CPoM$qM&vSl6j@x*>O&rLFZX3#C( z)o~5;O86>%LY@)wtf2erpNI3*{Ia7R?Z7{YdaoyQK=7M@JAv=$bf7YGMd0ke%3@(zgpZb zRQ2Bgocy7$I#p5qb3?xgbfr)Cs;;&V<4^mYra^Yqe#V#fuiWx#F#D$P&knilZwbo| zFIDqB8MqVWu`_4dsrlnZJ>}1=(A4k!J{&(y@MG!k6?&`fV;CpnLpx4iIk;AB9~1Co z@c)=msJiN(g*cucSo6`JAFK9p{4{|7O2xn9)%e=MPy4&*KfkNm=LF6;hF;n|PqmNl zZ{v9MmAP9@HNLv>(m!AO2A%f%F0UK%4WN72@2ux;xcrIsNd|5LzWL8JbJ+eKJ^#7y zG$dg}53%O>ulFh^L*A-GwTAsWJMkvQiy#N;`Tf8}W1~KfpTDpVaIK3t)*EBG)#q!8 zz2l8$g7la1=+xoWUNs(i;EYGj6*+sW`DTH9Bj|ppr?so&jSlfJ17G>#@Coj>t`T-*0p~c70$cZuz z`VUQMIw9Qi6Z{7F5e>Xps{@&NCG5qmxSos!etFA8Yd!_n15X4#uk)yW`Bfa(^So}~ zvZQuH=7`Xr2EI(tok@)-tL9w>aJKW+S9KdP?*u=`Iqr}2n>DEjV=nN>Nz(6h$e%Fc zSHI`{qk(f@<<6y2yHx$Lz^T9Fz|)gd{T%1GZ`WYIHjQm9^rr;y?P0#8F3`s8Gk+CKCz8hE{_+pnnh@%o4M&1*fsmpZOz zfiH53^fPb8q;S>#Xw;Mcr)i^ysQPtShcbQ}8V_2h>Q4;dkGNU!mMT95IM=aHmQ84{ z_OCSHoOgQ6nzc>sU$MY5P!?YKd=tlU&zSiC8)t{d4eIM1i9G$#H{V2lDdS+<8qy;u zd-8fg;K8*<)O%!le>Iyd<1ptP2hG44r?BDGW|CI)^DNkB1zp)9Nv+iRBm?bW18!Z> zri415q#%DCz&rG4xP$YFkRJ`)1$@L8P0Oj{xMr&Ki|@NuW(aY7HeQ>B*q zeNQ6TYO%-dRC}DL*I~bZ zXv8m<)p)sqGoC9n)hem>>ZVD5c^{&8| z?)`7=L*JWs@`#`j{l|)W`ns@X?gMd2r84dXLpu15hNUx4F2D}fN{I!FQbX3P_BlyfHM{TwYV{E_&R8FnRd$a;~pgyvz%!`@hHq{4UVVtbFV} zKCdZo8}E)V2R9jP8Pq>+_@{{$abWL1&ox+~=cA~i^EVzm5G}-c?9is8o_Ta)`^yth zCGgNp;JlC4F0a!b3<7~id?o$oKF^K!`>YJXKq;P^wfC2}ZGbGzkQW8M1}B0K6!XZV zej!@y|L}Z{8T>JzZ+5FzAwG`^GrV>hL1zWso(&Ira^WuQw4;F5>JO^b5ecm75Us*=S z2+LBmOW--EOwiZb^|De~e{%0R_`vgug2a0sJ5Jgc`L!%#Pzqd}Q#C7pi}7BQP4-hg zN{;u9T%(hN-?a0M=ZcacuU_lhZNz$!Z7cK%dyEDA&m%b${i6N&-af|P)$*<(NH4er zzvsHDl(diewfOY;2=)AQRsbIL?T~CLZki?IK>2sZO{t^imjSp1<&)h93aR;(jC$r* zjRwnCsrkk09Xsf1L>TIXB7cPawlAgsv_E8Iqu*5f+~A{qbz`pns@kVZmiAMB<9)}g zsP<960d)53-_%g;i!SXSztWR;cUSdWz(@V|Lw66V`jZ3nKVBD_<8AuwpgTOEc&e&j zXO;f*`KX_>uiqSG^fs@zecj+=eD=NDzfdr6bv>f{M#h2pd2jvjE+L?k()^!0raS}q zYG#e}jSHj~?L+(ceAkcFri2HXB!$3}sTc31*wpF%&%wY|`|PB{x-47sLG?pGM|~yh8|XM1Sw4r=>4!N>OK_`UX>V1?ff+>LU0t%hqO z6kIpQKmQLb`FKG#6`v^mXZy9e5L-@dKNI+ApQ-4UwroEUzlid(e^@}*snmnoY&W&N z48W67zNm7ub#~aH!B5a@%1C);w5uKThqUHZIWR7eUg&os|6QQdJUF={C+Gxj02YR^5|)aEQLHBW9Y%d_4wiVM>q5_?MV{6*k=Az<;o12^UkH~9I! z1O2x$E~*^yzJqAgOa3?KIqMYJP95_!KOdqKRIh)c9Rux7guE|a%<=@^v&w?VgKPEkq`%H}GVcd3s>#c1f&0cY z_P0HSPnK54do%c%4|Pg)9Ki8j_|5A-E9f}h{`TqKD31FySf!^t8~CaX$?=s|PfA$| z`;4?7<;I(#zUS2hu9*-2@Sc*L#zvYj$npAz{?7i~Irq!@>Ud)WKmEV7zuetm<7@r; z9_XK-8#$xvgAm{%U)f*CZw1}8jz?B-UX#+~dYb*+34d&$Z_;z&oKQU}Whv~}19zef zxp2H|IOx1M##6@g;H(qDK`Ndi}dciOHm!_c1 z_xO6U{TxPF3S8(VuF4U7(F?){rE2I_ln#X61Iw; zh<{o@{Pm!hxM#eXD(#>@&-xjEpg$t+f%+`qPq;PxC}ZbU=J`j&Jy4(2MDg(S|ph($6E^egHIfBu3$Zddp{-+Klvoi~@1~8d<}bf#@uP9{Q`naTe&*|z8I6*duL9?OTq@{(j2yR(aTRzv>iK@*Q(I0C zWgdvQzj3__`Y*no9!fh^d*Xpdd@tirwsWaJnGZr=H0t^M(&D_A)N{GM_n`kVA$La+ z)1nt28L|v5uOgm7iQwn^3x6p+s`&IH=e*CNc;pAA0O$J)9}iqyU}(qn{lFib2D}!G zcK=oHqYB%aEf;?Ze=~ryy}AFpvq7#-Y-6x$gg>#M&q7&y^92+45k(#b=7-dy)kGmq zQHy1qVp3%O$KY>Om$(0;UhsSLYLhzp=f&r9yL<29N<2hk4#-Pe0Kc`ZKmV$b)t?Gp z@e}e5QT}-8t;df`RE|F`%KJgu|F}=94zyYD$2aol-(J05Ih9`zJ|oIzC69IF_$lJb z_uQI+kD9+#&weg&?l*A!ue*AU-}kf(@lwAA{C_7rdsne9)P{No%5K?nS5x)7P*48D zA2lwj>gV;m#wPu*T;}5-EgTf~#eXN;llDb!v>8?XM(|Pp^$oMnEBdweV*c^#y)0)- zHGXFBTTzDDBATf7@&2d{c>435lU4il)Q?gdSIX}`rxpIYfSU(>Q(x)F+Nf6k_Kl8O zFVdmd`DXB2QT{ULRSDI94eD(u z3#DZFoi}BEY2e>--3;H_U$mbKd=B814|N#A@lN1;FE{zWY&%w`#+UE6qyJlMv;FV? zEcK7in$IV$Qtj6RH>2GBWxaKZer-l2|M*<4xp|)&A6tO@^o>pZ&Z{^A@Q)4a5|#Le zT7kPzW-ckEQ`$c?CBJ`upY5^1p|-DnnZJKd<7Y2a`5NFxl;g)vDjg07M0_>SYX<(? z`I~Nzs~$c7c|XbX5MIKNesRiac<*@SyB}+Vyaq>q&RQ{ez&fGQqfcwZdraxWrc!rD ztMO!>vOVpyDvc+tus5cdjE8Qy^xJvN>ybWE={NzUupavFfiC^ajusY<YCPYQb_xDO$V)-_YF@JnNV1N=ucUpZZ)Djx?cvlggS5bFKlmb3rN4b9_bJTxpNo8O zV1GIpWi;p(+}pK`*Z=g#OON~Dq>lytxU)+uv45)c(V*wKfF#f#%U)Q^`_rTs`Q{GD zw=~cT8sSg$*V0e=v*ew`r;0yef&N6Slzv~_^wE&F_!H&`@FxoNZKrRY^cH`@0{w{v z{qhyT!GZpWaUswj=|_kr6MiLuKMke8#kk;9{uX}oeNK)uGEbUcot-lxSy0QkaQ$aK zEAa=hpCoCm0+l$gyZAo4d*Q9G1Y2I?##J&-+`n2_r_J6F1=j;Nql|vq;c}?;HNOV+ zR+KyEm70_d_KCcSI3evaWysP7x?RJzt;r5KQku8_hwG0^x=fS~(4YJMSkoM^OQqL< zj(O$=y{+NDpXM}^QkKFV*D=_E_SdhL{tql-{3(~|O?ujII|V;LzyCn>?YWI_(g)ga z1^wB6NuT90yh$Huza8}7KfjTm`{?9)oBb}(cN)<=V+ozx82vKkYa6R5je7sdJn^wV1 zzcU`w)Y=}v4 zOMcC1sh95|-QIO#GxhzWeBRWwPU<-@KR!0t`I_Gxz`ybN=*B94GWhs@Q%x~zd6nM| zobNZi)}+Op5JkQdINxtNvS`hgS_O9lr~jo6-(=7x_3azer>~qaZ?*VS z&3ER5Vb03g!Ee#ed>i}J{Xwupa7%vu2I(KilVKUPkA*nAuvb3&1K(5LbjG*Yf?Th0 z_6IZMoXPj}_h1EQe;|LG1_QoU`EB51e|z!ojT|b!132yPTVqh05JkQVIQvWb)pe;_ z1=nnp{xLq!FDC0k72FDbJ?IjO2mKbN;MC82Ui49p_f-96@G*X^e>>bp)o%sP`DA5* zO1D(~#{b9Idj~dIegET0nzVsZ2)hg+fIvY;K#;N{2o@YfWt3^y0U2Rw0fDf~4l*pr z2)hg+?8-9if{e(r2x8e~M`V;Cd~^H zr+*lM`sMsJ!%h!)+lH*{!tV`M;h_9gt{2k5|8?J&H*1CwSgJw4A>0Z%j_=hz?~M$TaDM-z1^wh~zE3*HR?=Ia9wcoUv`>qR?4s#D4N!q*4s z;Fqc1v_&y{cD}N|7JJzLE$U9LIPS>@`(%=4e4DMg0t`^tzysxmN&gp`@PeQVEkp6hZ zbxE3}kM^TX`Neu6Oo*tse_tzjqmCMWQ~vON6xSQ`i-^zP)emR;UJd!Hte4c&@8){Q zSx|Dl4*V_0jrNz4aGvD-{X(0r74|Z(b-fV28_(+H2=CH&G)74?+gzGA#KD-PLyH;)DXk6*ea@&3NBM#Mis5&wAb*Ed~855-;iyLmF??Io+W=Gbw46nABPqMk5SBIHt0W=eKYo*8xvzu7L{KS`Q_IJ63D z6K)YTQ6BRBOFW+1vHl#gedI(ncx)HNHMkx^J*Vs&PH4a*+==tN-ur%M5lxtcyMgok zviZ@n3R(&0{TwfN-BjhD>m=OyM)ViXiwm<4-3l`a3#on|L#EIiz0k8eB?~Cfq90^ep-w3{w<-lLn+M~(^yI3kG{Vwq9UuYYf z+sMr9`pwYq1%K`1DhZK>?0n_^v1+e~!^WF=>*ev&xxbMljVnotyf%R^aR2;;{SMBb ztIfW?CdbnOKF71kx0~~GJpJ+3rszWZd8v~vSCDQxs69N8=lmP`YsHhCcZ8<{=X@H_ z>zzb7-&FgAe>|U0YIXiQIp2)HIp0<+ozg+hH#2a~r$0}O+9&6mi|qq%X2RxTdgKe) z$NLSOuTz^e9TXxDIRo15bY!8Oa{N5NIldDnZxpwfBb?)Y!A)pMv*X^YyN(QPNtqgj=DX*OTwIR9BJZ9l*K$o|!s6 z4wK}~z+EUGpZvV6R>E07x6i8DwPwru(;>(0JEh*Ev9f*-aFs{IVZ)k2i*(R0k8k=} zA`gw=JuBS&YPeOzf&caM!?{0myv^V*s!>+U?ZSL&eYRU3O;G7>FPQ3p` zm?WPLyUpNrx^M5Qm2j5l{xQsZ*CoqaA?HBZDDSRaI>=KzmE)-kyo#sFea8Jjg@fYZ zfju7Zv_qy(<+umpy!fG`M*uxxf3M*96|s;$JS3+slIU z?C+GZy$!i6!a%Cu1^eva^{0oGy=nyB1x@lc;JmNf@UMXn%aj@DmNFg#obShbRAx?N&%VdJ&!&k3o}UE# zN5TgsU#?C#dWrrYtx|`j;y&UnKM%jf4`|c)YJ(i#rEUZ6E}8!|5pc+QqK_c&8=T!! z?{be6qL3b5>vPF=wHeT7Xij>p&~vMG-@6^pBn0g7*P~6udA4Koo!!e=p6cOHa2Wxx z&wyV2_|4a3Z*&h~XDamlx_!;TD;0j3Npz~mr>JLM@rnF+Dd9REcML~`o)<&rzEvAZ zTKv9fhI}$g6L{TDwy4L~D}w$1)m}B3M)d~U%K?3_fBQSSn(nUviR|L}kDp6zIP7R! zwMnR;JW|?~3OysVcUEeQ!KwoPp*X}35&bB>p;*_~Ym`804P$|y31e{kL7yd3aMmfV_C*@T#@+bqP z5xh_SsXs3wM(E*xiJyt_#sa<>{0`gV-qlAlQux1;ac74Z&09|7 z13#DH0-q?9H>@uPzYm^h6F$9arQRnP_kqvjctW9O4~idq*dMsY@SBJOk1u<#R4^1S zP_R79vwy7r`y(&^ZdkN-;1&+5-vW8oA9rTjBKP;L1Ft0T;~G0~eg{Lzl=s~oUhWP2 zd_(daZ`S|x=?_0osC79oEEDcl=-=LVYWF!C$^>4CK>EGFBgtU@@qY6g);!Ppx#<6X zT${cwwBKv4`@dF+IQwy(;Y4V^elbN;T<#Yp;PJ?tq>`q`oY(&L4ELda&KC>#FH0^t z5uQC?!kyrAzSzNkYk6mKMD~0MH-XRj;sSqPfz~VaihQB<59bT_4-p6d_mz+bUdXFX z3cm>ttbe4x1K0VA=RPv|c@aOK{8sKy@$)8!T2Cp1kp2wFbN!=NPfC&NPX(_3UHBD!{q7}sABy)?V}LL5{yK`Uzx@^c&+j|* z>e{_0FNEcGv_a3Ta$9G=UOo9o5oe7y7T=$7;=TV#N39|G?1r56f$;ZX5!C>VJu8kJ zXU1#1d+xc6dm-;b*=f(IPr|a~wR(J?hT~Xn=AKbo)+mpq#AF z{jt1XWyg75mlf=nIe_<@sGXcFkLOZv=tP<}hk$pbk+>cs~ z_~>Z3B+v7Mak22PfBl!ErS{btz7psCIUhL6TfBVhiHh`F&WX73e(0<^Th7S)p?2VG z-;NF!=Scc>Cg4t#)w&$GCFQ5ijq|*p*QD*8zH)wX`+31DvhBlEIlt1!i*b?dD=>Ob zS=m0`2W0zh?d`fs-cL827yg-0mR!{*MYf;ow*X(C@!1H;er@7sq4BFyYQ{>0G7vu} zH`RGMy2mj+OPu547vhy=AzsG>@0)NoR8in&3v-6ef z0x$Rj%bCLS8M5=0>jG7ph(lgyv)e@HeovCLzEQ3V=zL%u%kwSdtybZu6@SZmXdRn? z^FpsW%z<@8s};-p&^bD&J(c#QK(76zt5LE};?uf?pEF_18&Z$|dJW%yW}M{A^u>XT z!f#$HGS1(7HUj7KB*%x}A6+bPI!AUSDb`QEJR%+f_df@U{dm5Qq455(!S_s4UZv&} ze8w{k;&0>c>-H+IFDQ?bQGY7RW8Xg-=JzUa5T1$i#-U<7YFjlj_5~Oxb zgk1EWB0hY55{tj(cu>1qa9+rVW!*P`aoF2e)F1yQ&kT*?dXMaMfyd*`Tl2UfY9nb2 ztSf`-;&%teP?rNsG18dKK{6cX)2EPxLU$ib&V+qP@XsDIQut3wY<7K9=m|^d>wJD za9(*l<$2Hp-kNv!4&d>W`b#{X153Xz{7eV$-#Y7Ka#}B?;5+v!@Kl$D|Ap7TIip-J zk^UIGH%0$S=r@7?*XzSwbD24kq9lGg^1(U*;{o{peBb5k+}X#w2>xEY6Fl2@JXLPKeg5l;(X#rQI2Xl_g8s8#sxm-*LqX^8|pZc7WwG` z&iNIw`1~M^gr@`N{K@-itutW~uDT-Z=luJvO#4hNaKFFd%J>_>Up-OVBQjRl!T%Cp z8GkeQN8;;$ohOEwq9ndD{&w*5c-!aAA^zEa{{sKh6JO+4#-GM9j=$V4G>$nC7cb;_ zoLBuV;vw^C9E-+zvYhh3gZq4VJWj$mHa7Qq8(;skw*me)qJ5bk4}D{2eKajtHw1{U zd|oUO{Cmq|I`eNVte^5M9(l%gr-a&@?fEu-Zm{Ay=LxNmHHnhiMfrT2K3&9R@RfVr zbhHqV4&p2AjRpTo|1aP0yu%{YE=qd|qjt%F-8RT`Y?AOd`$v3g7dOre`LKxSULwx? zyb`}ps_X1d!RL^PO9#bG`F;YQq>ttgeqNgUPt7SOPpRQQ;k@2AUls9Lxc^2!jf7iP zit{Z0eBVEnWqB*)94O=R6`d6Zd5Wvj9~XFcS1s`=^MK;2^oRVUxEdknLCNbeAO2Rx zRew#`E#&?4NK-Lh^L>x}yxf3d1;3VMiBEA=l@#s3Se&F!zTcA9E*zhF%dcGJ_>lj~ zdXu1M)uJ2wl>LnSSJo@+_dm}IIS)$CD>HPonL3*Sbf#A1OFBHyPFD#CO47UVo*7f8)AiV1zM* z?jJY&{a(R0+!FDc>;CZ@J;o`PBEE8cWCnji?Yc|pH!n4l{UzmRf+Fwj;1iAVjN9LW z_jDX?v%mAj%nt%LJ5YXjz-PUq5AGPxRRr1}xEX$ae5XM_ZXdtB;mY`_ZVUgeCsc{n zWshIDGJZzzyZraEU$~KL7A5Id#?J!&XX{#BjmRFqZ0j2b_@ADh5%{hn`$;uWzgNbO z&Qn}n@Y@afbd-cszt5EZrZ}@+W4P!~k?&V*yLI)39zvi0ItBlahgRKl-oy?N#!1 zQYvunrzJ0+sGZYwQU-X>x(sICS8LF zb4c}paV-XMO+j2Tz;7~S#DV|ox-$KR&>wwI#A|%_yBGhj>q_XKQa(_<%&i(nsvRxm^{XGdd=VRCS zSD$cy_qTUA_t$9b6Q+RQb>QR@I%l@_4(I;r#P1qu;4j~vUOU{8ogagK%D;o?ABcGL z@LG(#AI(x^5BJv;j3cq&|MJnT3(9?Iif=6Hw}ChFRnc>~r1(0qufpx~=7)2WxxZ3< z><`$Zo-6}i4x@Dfl)FR$J|QmQW*=Q-cHb(t_K4{(Zya=b_d zf8NWK^HK3!lPHO=94|7!H`i@x%o~@TuN*I;ABnik-m$cEzW-w%gvX0G@MpF+b~MCf z*U$SPJYFP#|3`GknfbHtLuFehB!gewQ2B!b`p|V2trK{>;CY@bpzFdkj00(q=W80h zPxvSE>AJ{>^CVAs!oL^t{>Q=EHM+A5;a2dupN~j87NIecw2*fI=YAeB`&MF@F#wZ( zZFKI?aje%DT_fai%maDOizg9L1}J+c*5w^Xj}m=FgJ| zE5;WW^ccY(Q09DRzTZz+EB1v98ZrNIJj~#aAMjJM&fo4F8jG zz1<^x3q(A4-`oZM+%t{r^no&2Kg|>Aih05dKGjcok%E0I{=J{hQ{3aQUu=Ag{{P8$ ztK_)H;yl~^&34sGzF(QzJsvp6{b=`tBjo$YxZQYu$+KbEk81Q&l23v>w`;H2@9fY> zcnWaNo3M6&)C~hp{ae`%Y2aVqI&dBBZ-&OnpU1#6QC6y5uC&h2<9Nh>8JdTK+o-3@ z@kmnGQ>NB?dt`fU|B5)Wy{2xftI75%^B@uYUz<<5l9Ro0tPkb97t^0e_Uh7bp5tFP zYR0_qEPsOg6^vJ^yX}m;o{xSa>}9-jJKg0lQ!pMnqfX>G6_$u#Q{%5 z*>cO5efT<6mgjNmz4q_4lg3G1GUQTG#tr)IJ87RF-0Kqgn~6ANfcM=$p2B)N3`Ifx z$D`Qa);|+|A1Quhc`j=Xe8v8DEchKN<*&}apR*L{SMC?v!0$HN-8a(AOi_~mnaJlP z@Sars&6`Kc=NRCrz@2{#%Nr%(892}JJFgu%kmq^QuYVreKhJ$}{b4@HlfBA$AO`%H zDu3)W#D>~SeC7BP2Y!R6^&aPs2_1ikuk8N`;LpqadT)W~?0n@skPQCY(`V8O>O=W7 z&htDVk9#!#t1xb*K|VPDXNq{p{J{K=^W-tbjo&NI`@xMG51+&`H2;_s*QHj4ybtds zXZg6>s|sYv`}gn0i@asL$6v=nzE8;euG~N0ow_-%#*mda>8Ow25C3_yNgcGnDee}$ zUyk*wUI@RN<%;jm`?K7-ZeS{P(NZE=&7w@FnKeu~7Q-_JNd>ZiRSHiz~ zjn6HV>yO2GzJDUWeoGO5ZwefK{n~_NQ9rM%23-#e*_Td$JlntUt-X|NUp(+6l#31& zdCmFg*ROG(74us;)cO1Q`Jz$>2%P;JyQP1~ciuChm+_TdQqIf%8?Op^ z?pL*~RmZ5MJdJ)W;u4FpL;3Ds^Y2zvzau?V-o5Cv;Co#OkB3|W%G|y>*(+_MLbi$U)3-2Dfdt22jT;M26)?AT>p{#slOdw@c+4F9fNxg z8P*Rs^!oJ#_f2E}6YNfj9wp1WAm>4O{XoAO{QE4$#ftOM@HZWQPczT`lzo!p5)EASM)))9hfliur<1_p zw<(dmY@a8U4zAF57E|ULL})bZUXK-C-61a zS4Scd3pqZ^aIV7Uk>}=WcOIZW$v->f*wxEZ)9QpC+r^Si9^s0bY5Y9x9`01JU$Vg2%P_P3)z1g@MM%bR}E?*`Zqyk^!{CJN%u4l0PCnAo+ zzj|?;`vJwz`K_>@<8#FKPo^B77+q+5)Ju!hl;aZzoc(*2|3oJ_J~oAXe*LYpvj2ME zi72~0Y;i-HSAy-!{tc-e-beN?6>{G1g&&=7u6!!{mjRsTo6l>Q+R6Ge@Vt=?acVJP z*JC;UG2z00H}ro{Z694`1`di}9PnhwCv<$=RJP9s+&NKf?Kfgb%tP6}RN$P4UYBj8Y@Y$&Dd+Z8Cwr#I?W>OnZC_2Z`EBL)&4B(G z@S@ibZ6N!X2s{qBZg$T@a(q=|Li6j!!zQEU`V$rPPkX15L$2QjJQ?MYq$X?Sb$}lA zrviWUGS^0V9guHkg)`d19_COwuO!7?B) zzNcdRj066k>3T7Ke+kX={9S7v|83xP+;??O0ahgCQ!?}=f|t~LOtFIC`RADb`TmN* z&_RViFN5pzH0U{Y>YbgZ@^z~OJUH(1{IY3g)d{>lp}dZ55!!CvFFN*>+s&Ly#EbWp z<}EvTO=~3Wf%=2*yWaF*e&BQG2iE_RGU)J)p1{=($n$$g`Wx)i8Wdc%i*XllexAH) z?@g7a_kHg$>-PZfNGJTq#}fyr`mgF6Xj;Gh8tW_3ueknll~0HDczk&gaVb8k+`@jY zKjEXOid`y1_h#G(oaQRGFSLSB>HD=(QNx*-Uo_2QGw994aRWyOT(4#-|zUPR) ziq7YKV2ZB;@*MvN%Y!946G;pC7|3&c8w|f#S7!{sA^Q1ugt%Jo{>1kikp6V&=Xq_D zYg;>=B}+c7rD$JOq=-Yahns7LXW{C2yeGpHE#kPd$(v&>UV)T}9yxzid4%6=U+Vl(J>~crfph$-5Bqe696t~Ao53s8aq3mx?D zW)&L9J{NFRUig_OPh7Y|;B+0qf*x(wul?|IPz2R0!{y?u0ygnI@ zescbqF)r} z7vwxBd$!HrJg4!?3_KlW#^9HR+&PS2an(e=TH&{ur6xadv^i(I>`&Y zoKGVTtkcQsSs!qgfAMJ4ad{s`h4}Dz=(=@qfZQJpg+x3|C@*d8(3AIRC?0O;w*cpP z@p8w{`|!Ge<3W6mH``-}T;GkYS45hbDN6F+3H>hc+|^EZl;(4t7w0)&e7OrO&4+n} z6y<>0k4$s4Z`IpCI_-O*KPmgEL0y(so6?_YLh4Oq@xCnSup9AMj-0rSh zg^NnK(<0XAJbvbSQh2RAetIBpMmL%*DVM)YG+kb zyOQ8h{mOk^H+X&2gSrJ@WC*o^-~AQ)x&+aFZw#)ly^vQ$3%?1c{pe`vZ?emc-)r4? z@4)0d3qtPy=ljb!Z^J)nTS|@ik-QE1IPc08Ie1PZ;c>tdQ8t`XzLh-Avpo0P6(wT6 zmF1Hmmx{7P;*Oefzv1_|X8^Bry~`ov?M1$QZJk(O)*n+$#E0!)U3Gb5*}gd7 zY~R7w())-rv!&VL1Hvw`qbeA;&WweD*hP zV$DJ9uU}qksTQg~^=B8E5jaSH6686bGBy`pD(6!QaBh#P3zypE_DTcJ?NOzBjlyz! zB>>Mv`KZ|ZO+3z1zu|cB`>ehlFm~S#3 z)BZ2#DM?V?D*G*+r~Vv^JoiA}hmvp_@Aaj!`nSK{;C;!ynIaGQe&Y}S`le`3@9E(0 zc=38KZjZ66+Dh6*zpz0+=k1yEe=pZq1F+vd|LzxnvX+K;pn zo(i1X@l?wvE}ew){#FKfjop2M@4X^_`8zxwr|?%_TEwGUnR|73zfFaM_{#6_#DM?y zk6D*;o0%y};w!(y6A%8A?m8c@zgUX+%J1+bg5R;}%sRZjVSXTwFN*P$t|}%zz$#f12*|-c`6iu|DGSdmmE3*BeDV@@oc_iZU`&l*H%f7h)0LSnx}Yn=~SC z_WKvJeOJ^5e(mwe7^|ir5Ai_O7(4&m-0dSmEW^cl@tC}F&!90c_|;1mv-bGFJ4UG z6OZ!Jioey8V4NyKm5Th$K*@VD%;UegbVzzxm4DohNRrO`^Fym|7`m>q-F{x4`IJBW z+?Ee=&pz5$f$JoH9Ex?H;a%ZB=^%M8?z?39h&$0KS@Qn(|AEi<^AuWmJougllD7lr z`_X>47y65RB-{y{@2l+c$=Np{`wyEj&f$Kx;{6(FWqCK`y(kyA%lBM|0QmK5?KMN= zQ#X9TH*$P@kTaAQejh5?YJB9`qB=4 z5M-r+%WmPcIhyw@;223pWTm_}>5@^>E(AgWu(O z@+TJjo{6Q_=j2Zs>WK%h-tg&VWq(qDCjxJC{zg)8O!3bn z{N7Xc*L_B;Q;z>-XsF@9p(OtjaGy;o^wl`KAVcaW+L$__{b0!OUoNm3lFx)(bc~3@ zvwSB?N&Qfp@nNX^=!Bz7a*~gS{N|8iP&TTSH<#3p zb+I^~g0jSkca!9Pnhg8XfUoF(a5i6$A}GpYZ{qdk;2cP!;fk6H6W@IC9%m4x5? zyTq>BEqc5;`TR2Z=#P&&7C8SdF=>){UHgaO*MV!|fzP57{$pkD66Gx~JEYM6DSr}x zb9?fAIhVTq`90?`ap?%O2mDBaT)j3c>qZJVfP0>aeBg2S_TlkuSr5r)K#s@V`6>0c z%kkD%7XEU7Is5U1mvVpM@gxR3)9nfu<^B@$P}Cm>e91Ib`v28mY~VdGp4*sHe@TVC ziQt_t|6M8RewSc;*CGbv-b|@qzxG#w@45K>ei674-j8uv3%tQSyAB!BbI1_mP+L#q zK>N@>0|ywtv-KQc>@#$TvHQRwLybKXy7%naLlC+R>(M*-`ewRLQfI;*Qs@7!OD@ZM zB5u$B`EWC;2(*XME8<}V?m6*yu%A-cuqy+9bB++7{8LpC{?Ol)H>tl0KEF@ve632=S%%gNUd4LB z94fDNPD5VcJ9Z~8o>^$Ewv2z@(>lQC=Oh|5atBvsRKE*2*KhlJxt;6xm;duVp#J0l z4!@q@e47q^s~)x3aBK9mNksAE+LTtI;=wOoz)gxXUNob8Om z--BNb3*K+d3Q3;_cG$q{HUCUWZg*-=Wn4*?+S3ZTB*?K$3jXHU5TDx9i}Uoizg|rY z+Vj{-b7~UlDEs&f{LS5=(21PJ9wr zsgr&S@OD(8|L8Qp{PEo3yGqdi{c#Fjhw^?2KYwB#-ENo0NUW@b_;%>afZa~~UFlkb zz;h7nKS>c^xnJS|f78EjzNh&|jt}LpPm#Yq@JXNFA8kTGkr$kw1wWg1mM}W}xXxT% z#EY-jW;r&_R|ldIuqXIjAMb~;zikfOeqVXrP5P|R=Rnz`(0i%UewH>3{fYM_4NKSD z7S;%RypYr5dzZ)Oo=sz){pE|mjahyHF7rdU&wwFAzv?rhXRBTx_3YI(_=rmY_1hKf zKL(TVchb~G8ynmmRgVZ1r#PHvyPg#Kr8QIs;$#EPb~RddBltc(^4kZy6Txew{qZ=j zYY0!qdH&9O{^y4Vg?U5`gs0&BY^mV&@aFFxF5yO8pJxDH7Pb6QgoLwx{*JkOOZUQI z?kxTK8t4}&UzmQpruQSHMY|?L zFUzke-yyFguS*1;in7)v_fSoieq9F6^K;hKo7Z_I$Ik{_UsL$GZU5fL+>$)|7X!S- z@|tZUfm6TZ^{IV@=r8=<#h>POe4_TUC!&=3-rizxkfmF-{ss)RNRS3B@NB^Ubp{iyerW^V89qMH2jTK)UNZ@!Oib^AO!*$UDh z1Dxxhx8uF~a{bAOALDO7bf1&)ILO;jrWm?+l!`# z+7&M0aga|1ul|p@e$4~iAMfxayazZ9Wd?X}QjS-SN@q_+N&E!x649ReS|UD<)#ZQ8 z>&?!O2j8(=w0|u4U$r`$oX?Y;&+i$Ig`5rid_O#!YH(-gC*ZxrNnC>8cDbW(ephyW z<_N4iz)uB#;? zO#Ds|4}SRySGp9oX6L7Y$JhUf%uoELR1r&dehT*{JPzmi`oYxV)%V4rCy-Bg&j`=^Ht^S`7cW@C z7+N3kmGgcg_}`W~@sNHGSIqm_ekVx*e{j)=f9Q8{wNwSIuaxsX!L+_I!p{uIb3M^@ zgx|6rT3?xPp5$pg5m!2N9qB19@=)L!tsC#pp52emAtARYv@_x4=R`~mSw*s3u24tVDMri%* zGpgK`>$gCT>t9#L+kkzg`c1&?D3ASm`INjbV8QccPT=O3FPBQ!{aUx;eeK7$Ts$V% z?}Z%uH*8<4;Cu9`etvI>54^Fz{P?--UwqL}|BiK=*hi=CgXr}C+pw^+alz<*NMC-@B46kz2Hqx-ZqZ+7bt!l7q0*F!zD-ORKKCV zh{K|$`M;3sH{m?*3r5uFekZ5;E#TFB{r>)(>gV@AMBH7UlvDjq$dB9R3yGf_=e_X1 z?VG<-bE@A9-m*L~A~PrxqrJM&;97gxU)NC`<$#F zrR98^KC*vop9OKOtx6v(+h=Gb{Nwm;yR`F~9AB=V^XK{Aazo|%O^~;sELOKnQ`tYR zpZn)W<5q+`$LEBc6YW#1&R5sv_SY8`dFO=vhdy@KlI?dx-iz|_jj82i`?-D#@^IbV zLc`_!H#8Rh+fo1DUsY}(=O@>1fc%gqFD}dVn;>sNxgvuwaV!QgK1@au<7vYHmWclPGqWw63Mm&w4E9Z|L@=lZuhd-Pp`|oD`@Ne$! za&2V)Ou)S;TTX6SL(U&J;>P3m#Y)LKdHm${E8Dk!dDO`;ba3k5rVmAYSbwvo<9^N~ z;TGULzPFfj;&GIO$K!cIZoimUj>%H{1)mpu(d0xYns;^cKWn?b_vKYI!1(J|yP=== z=jLxq9o^@jzVjLP0_Xj?yO*YYp`DO)4YL-q51U1jT| z1o?h5ALI>9g`e%Oms^y}91suKXTo{DE{i$#ci-H={nstQ=cO#*Ia0(r<^D$v*F=IR zw2A#ne!eON&mr0&S7p$F$vNHs;Dmi{lrHdBM_v0c%E+2UN!L*Z@c4HjFZg}dz0IAM zCoYIle4U7^>LcNQsh8Uu@pr-qH{m?@pU&S@Y-*75+X9^1@AapyM*JMGUq1Le5a-wJ zy|&ZFa_0kkg??P^ggochbkDKm1;zWkArlFA1Lyoox%+R%<6_631J`(gkA+V~E)=#c z3M<(KxGod#b>aSZb#%fessHJ`h!?l-t4b5!)f&%O$BSn_1humMETg(#F88Ga(=mibAII?-u6-?c*0td?+KrY`|IQj$NDA(c;>{HkBUpU9e5h>JV^)E27ZKL z`>;OD1b+DTu%dxM7`O#^be!&MUEte+Uny4oio9Mhpgla`UHf!@$n_M5x;k6#iEYYn>#= z#|YdAeBQ-xqO$s<|NAnE{Vp?jte@ALD(LCA`186_e02`+S%1T0B|_$NmN%gN7q#D8 zM2?>a^4z|SJDkjv?N0~pSSIqzRq)`ia{W%|dc% z2YFoJ{4<01pyBf2fo!0P~ zh{veGxvz1Y$rd`u9uxQ`@IGreGp`))ghJwaCn-Vn!=KYP)nOU9$j+|nwDz&@LxLfFFKfd^VN(Wg!4sslKmF;7L9QPRDHk4tLsw|WH8INO$z%P%j zSd;r1`R98t)W7CmCohuyONAV-+pf1>QcZ0X4Dv4nINP_d-jeAW3Fm!peJkPrxaOty zhe>!0&U4-@Joinw7Pvoevfbw$2mbjH2d=Om!Wxk`$*{);Uh5w#-{tEZ%EMH&7sopZ zycQo!X~sDs>vMpg0$zppGOBP+1^mZ({(f0_xuc`x>+(3*!}yFHO%BN8LJaU2i-=FB zk|z&ye<1xluEYV~HhWL5+TR!({$Y8?sEQc`y_)m(J`hO_gktz z73aBq+JE(PAqIn~Gebo#oY-<&!*ZnGS( zc*yDD_w;ded{UYzBt=&t1QvE!RaXd!!E#92t zLHU!ydhuTFH2i&V_PjW5H`(7L;F&B}QbnH=2pm+O9`T6zQpDp(drw<=U&f03ivvDC zMb|>!m+@gtp48Jva2H0zY@Fn34A# zX}zjkr;u)1uUaurW-Etk6mHFDUbQPDj9=C-nqf+npEha)-3Abe~HiE zMe%|cV;6Q`>VDUw%Yh%f&H-Q5TEt^~y-THdpG4Nr&lT}^PE6qUUQw}Mgprw|BzyQd zA^y&Z75qLm-kYrVUjXr#KoZ1P-p}O(KhM#!S919iROVBAreZzH&k1?JCwwhkk5-TKsW{)b#9O`mU5a#^=kI9UtMox@o#c;e?;(M@EO{3+Y$pmk<1*^((Z=qsT96 z2hK0KedxXcAM(uDPQ;VPdJF!R`E=ia4d=-Nf1EWce6ND9@eMuB9BqHh$@{XpOuT=} zh~JN2T)CI1whI5Lol>EX$DOyIt_{~ncm{ADU(~EU& zp1&LXH2|e2O-s`~QV!(gs<$h-icT|-7Wis##l>Z(w%?g+7PsDkBd*T02jo*I|0sH)U5|NDf z#eo+C-mITHN9&^EU7)hW_@{8gZWt-;ejlnzFA5ql4Nz1$=IY(FHr~)uX)#PXo@+ecI-> z%bQEWGl6q|+F)$t}8O7gM5Ip4ouJ!(fD36BTP^T>ua=KE0+ zo&cQlb$_wZ?ea=^5^x@uz1=&G;`goj?NjsjZDR2K*EM+$?Yg?+=z7FQod)?dm6%U< z&uHJIpmX!DjAsHjYA~P8eKhmvwGlIbYoa>||8K?~{)Wyy>GkTbuK9LvXZcv*e4YPl z&$rI%U+F$%JRUe-=U=MY@`Ou&uPty*0&w1w?9%4YAIUp=>|}Wr#sT*4J72>0j{0l* zFrET=_U|`)`JWC{PWg@TG~n!C;_-`>|882dBiEk^oc+6TVsphGY7_`uQ&N1RI}88W zzfUqRcnbTPc4Gapz}dgZ9fdc?miTKe>yHP{d!|haFFC&d%O3542k%4T{OsRq;4XQ* zOoBY;SI0TuPLak-HGe;e<6|GAI&`7^$+2u-8ss@XDVdHpdC$!YESbr_OyC@!oz_NU zdjF(;!S+XY32pz6zbWB~diY~y)*lO;`MavZnqKxBV1YfQ*fTgm!YLT{Z2389G__L5~F;5 zW&1O6J^|(K(;Xhj^+#KU-#k8T8CLIXgk)bVa2}sZze;rLB|Hs!qnW7BnNB_2AzD@X|KLZ@ zc>FEBuTm{lL44(Wn+*O$@8%ALOxgKLd(yyPeeS<=g^fAzmGgf$;cwOJk>iROvh$Vp z#DZU^-5*x^-AlHg*3ruOpWLH$K@#R=8|0Hv5>D6SZs~7oH~#&He;=9_KYKyeK1`U( ztoZ#SJybq;zr`4f^)ssDcHh(widWeh*n6OH(%4=2&EwqkX1UXjZ)#hgxP+U5^Ej7M zX~e3o;Txv|*I0q`Z-1B74Kk0M+_Nz#pAY-P_)g>W74EHh*No$NSnGm3KNm7&&YwS# zEFI*(2RQE&+B*HBN^<=U$niMx`-@)HZrcv*p`qii+(>Bs-qzN?|9h)cdsvxDCUlJ%t{{wDAy-n%~4 zf7uu~sGr8+Ib+UGe*gWP#K}pVr?NgP^f*x7o7wG4d7sve^Bk`x3ue~K?eC9t_~RYC zzk>5wSMcgmgSSOs%g>LieURsTp8rnY=FPf^Ti6IU^b-DZKHoj%tTgAJb7fh-2{>P; zcItia&`!g&N5IwTGsJwGgnVAKVW2+Ox{1SqYweKdb-nKKJTqZ*P`<<=&v@Q(XfC{# z_vwvjH#hXWb7xWm&Igir;=C7S&Fde|)ENWn1NwO%n&-_%<7Y&w{o^GaByZ>~{O9=o zbmvVcjfC?)v_Xqv?knMK@JNOa%qpGl-!Wv)&*uFWe{?WH0wW_BSE@R&&-vcsk@*ep9)%<5*tKPnAvh&G{MAH*K_X|Bm!|pw9?? zLazzC^pZUmoagxc_0=yMa%JJc-?3CB#JK0FmAhWM3JK52BfoyN6Y{*SUDm7b%p;{Q ze!#dJIIn9PUN+@x{`u{2#=XFKUHk0)RVO-M*)k8f#s{4HN8ugIDouX3ZA+Fn^bv93 z{?UBooQ3xb{ydd&6L9VyBOX34GOWJ(6zjJD=j)oYZE95gFIT<5RyoCw^N-i{t=EjW zr8bkaXm2OvIevG_7pSW-6Dn}dKR0-F%boio%p8CN`Rm1b&c8#3`g^s&bILy-_&?T~ zc1MRi7TQF8{QU#|onxSJ#10;}$RBfG5ib?z`@s%Xc<;-P2j{;sP`Y?+R2#$jYaEZ@ z{f68gU4D2x?dR}c9Ym*ma6vz}M~fwuAH3S~eQUe&=V!rSjkk_OGFGnZ* z$E#kA)2p{C^%eb}?C0@>zpA+BP|+xmOR_%f}ZsqR(vI02L|tl^Z!^J-h`<}-uijS(F@XLtueuLH1d0&ihGtRSrW7W?6ybnY9#{0ci z@OXTAc4h7w-j5O9ihVQYJ7Bj1a+4SA>yg{aOi|MKr2@~0(hYuQiSMgLTC(#U$Oq2n zbnuG|d^<0XIh0TSS;05-7jf9N*O)N=msg47`0#2+H6O<%kdF5#@7?bBth zOVh$vs^0;57s{uvAJ&SH<#8V&w`YTx$|3i&q(hGNZyT}LE{#t*590%ce@|;Kys3wN zIe(47Ie)Jvzo<+5xbi{v^8J=(@CR=wagE=TMtJ(?Vja%*F5flTD~+e>lwD%|l#c6` znSZp}^2_SA?@~Q}d953IdHqzn_ADOS0^^w%IA0G8y?SDe8b(t6PT)S2+y7a8O^%1b zj{c6g)SsI+TyF2oLs;M8ewNqezU(aPH$mQl^1UXr?#uaL$9W!aHE~_K$oXK0T~6@U z{d;2w_hahs9?oaj=LRpfXofqd{_6tY3*P1G@(!Hm{{MH|{Tst2+zi}>a_{tUB?5w-J5&jZR`wlVE-^5qmSIO@?5c;y#(Fko!rmTmxytI@5jnm)T^o7kCITI!zFmbR(;n`8YhD5{uJ=$7YN%Jq965gKYOk2 z`7_@iLUHBqOJ+hovGV(^s`EXo(|5msGRyF{2F&+o&D z2QT$pvB!bMIt2;`*~8Z{3E(yE_AD|&!c8_Y?r^+bjkwuWj+YDmrb2$thASV+@yft? zj>kVguF%W=a6I(GgkNu`w`rGCJh=X*MK->Y32Ll~)JRA$e^%KW;!{`?!7uj)Kv>-GT?Td=%qyvPe)&&A!kx>{`s%Ih+J5O(`ePm{|_Eb@BKkRbeJ z`&30dKZi;3Cg6H}2Oz55&voVXfdx3*pXc$sccuAX>okk{6Gy_1PwE-v`&FEf=j)+; zjY@S@CuG_02F}-GgMaAvk4D11z}bJ>z4=jL67B=e{tce>eRHjZ8-@%2dA<5)($H8P zaQ}Q0;YHl+&|?B$8#6~6ZWDI$zr?qI@8)&|-&gx_6TXi|<{LEF7ePBZz#m9$yeSVV;CXglX9H-rCG_s83m_tVfk>cKjf@7J<}PySIqPQiOa_`One-ro;`@8S1=-zsW) zGdYjaaGv9`fBE8_Y79Ws4>N&t9t~f3q=W|TM>zK*{(UcPxW=S*Q0=0hazBb4DdI8o zzYC8vjsQ&d>Edyo^Z2e|;;}FZPXO-uQ_Qm~e_#2BR>G5j^L(}7-+B{u67EF)@%x;b zwkzUOC#wPn)t?4={{8dC#-c4X5}pa1{mZwnZiO%jkN!TiAJm`XX{43#Sm4~xYmQr< zPX}D?Cn=~W9{j2QT)!EfB<$pWiLcE21n|!nZnZcfF|>Efu^jIuGpA|%aifFm&wxDJ zKS^D9O_+p7BQBgTQKK3@mD@XJwD61TpI-i{T59ibZa=O+4*X7I8wA>0*&ce}Hk3Ce zM~;j@Uij_RrhO4QPYl_SyQSQ}Qy|Cr8?|m&3AN-;CgQ;MrkhF*~CqI(?<#Ck#jRk+{^(l`jzm@)`p}u(VS{3NjSMpbvi1XY&53cy0>9gVy zeE*rLml*HYr#!!`aRr)}>Uxn!{8z;#uZ6k~9MHX|edv&{dkz94kPpFiL3~x_ zIeuL7+LPWNJ8(cqI8}asgYk?VE8=qVJ7OMOQ`Kz~yykUF)S^LAyFdv};Pk>wo-v8I3^pWRU2~Psf z@|hJ*6x0Ftzjs$vMyOKdy}vx4%Ha3Ff6zP<54jYSY5aFlZ7rfuQFF7o&&$V`ZPmS*R-8cP8N6E|<>zTTbqGKGbUg@6x!o`M6)n{ea&qc;a6EiL!pK-wAnl^1ZKQ{cfD+ z^|^1`sXlVQwgdN~tQ@(lOE}^z`^WVkpVFXSNc|Iq|Gci*xqNCxxqct?n!wZl@JEjb z==ZmGxYs56w}ayV-mTiI$lQwdCO*G6(bh)H-*)g5{>%6}(!(tyO5*c-6H_s6yTI?0 z>rCxD?(F;+jI;WIB5%FmUnulPjVM=kemd5poPVlGA|5Y){Hs}BXDFZInG8Ej;ME=c z)sB49yp@D`&k9^S?)Q@h33uQ;$NR;vGZ*HUaMh0@o;=TQI>ue9?dEV^bXm@pa zot>`G-!ISNqFRUWgX~vL7XER+8GE&LU!8=zAa4Zku;uOS0v z4xHn=;ggqVi%PgEQTWgOX;Ik2VbKz91kUmKqS~Fs#emEH^YyS9{3EwFmMv}*cJjZ( zS6&ZW!9P)EVbK!t%oHW@d0olZt4{ErcKo4Y$+*yX5np*--~s=$NqX%&vDx{&j${2k z@DJ4ZsaL6(?0n_*uyKlrU+ap|v8AK4^Oe`b7VzC8S5G(UL-};Q%h$v5Ohx-vE?loV zAkTYsZu~9tY2PXp=P8o@JPAIxt$Su!PTUsrI*dI%qE_HG1wXFVPZfUf@9clx?D}!* z&eIP=UL6CRe`jBPsQ-&yo9FO*RWxzH`F+x>ibcD7T#YzH^8R*-umR`&N`Ah2ow<4= z*>+K1m`Yzp^n1nI%<4et|dvA$nLmLV=36j!A_I!|#;f!;Kf@l!>;`e`B_ zvM!3N5$A<`*89v;9}79&_t=p-+Nbfb5Tg%k+r(iN8zMy6TW^njG{;0Q!2k3k%NAI9?S}Ryx@=SwaxVZ=Xpcb3=tPsyHyQydfqSwdCL1&Ch*Ba%DWhR z_dw1gYB$?+5m#=P)lmyJv%mhhge&8o1ii@@r>+dk?q_&b+=bp0@b6FCXVPYmWAHm# z9LEgs*KhixK@M>Yen*Sr7(G+OrTw5c`6!O^LG~-h$vE)0{k5S9#Zf+JAJC3C1umHU zU;_BWqc|qxZ#j%;h2B5s#Ao9Ydm(RUTmNM98AT=I3i|7#_~`UgH!G9;){ z)|U)@D`pkz|JyP{;BgAl$JcLMa>#N08q`JA%K9>)@0@AndmX=hkpesz59eYLk5qSb zEnbIFeXO6$2>2teA4PR?JvOI^!@$U2?_H==!4<3r`_jCxS$C(mkvf0|?DYTcBkFfU zK5oXrq8bS|UJ~nQmM_%&Wm#F?2RYt1y3p0UTb4J>7IyJ^GQCpAPs1erCg8k}H(|uQ zWUYi-fb;cPkrtDl=_K6C^@G=A!0US963+JVc%S!vncrpm+>qmOdv(vh_saHpf%AOO z)aUCV+vfw$*WdF=+nHe!?gh^B7Y;nw zs+Dk`!oJIW8Wz+^c(8t4=d~R&b*_Bb__b=>-n_;f-|83kiU30m!^ZEMM3?6?^!?R{>&D=Tgt$04m1pRi% z9g8k7Fw&J>zZ3l@8gef1Gfy_}k;k8B{;?={ko_?{PN4LHf4In@7EzAu{4|VzHe4^O z<_UlEwe1r{&u1$2CxXw{%O>!T_pUc3pEWz5ulHjXiT1UEKkV*_QU*(QK40(0q8=ys zb$UM^Pxm1y?cwWvANrXG{3VC_{8+%0ov*y!_ksVpZT$9v#_W9M^^9@8h|k|ue*Lph z_UoT)?{Bbx-)!x;3x)lYg={~q18j=*lmmQ~|L~6wTE0Hw-;dA#=3FlSF5m^9^KNIj ztC%`4iv{F$KHxn5v^K8&R+CEF17JU;dM>dSJn{U+c%KRx;D$T``53viyFCPd6mk?r@Pemi)D%4pxy zOZGW&-n?G)j}QOtQYlv!u65%)?_a)LKmWRDJ<)#ryDj@)d+;}P<@WPJ|No=xy#t%7 z!v66zZQ8V~vcnELOalmn9hQV$Wrd-J9TcJLD560TBC{$&*i}#>Ln@#IWki;dSx_N> zKtO?_jIs+detB{}PkM6O_x--V`$tc6KcDA0=XuU^#y$7kd$W;tsNL;Ql>JMD{p{aH zYoFDO_lX>6d@=&(@)vJ8=hXxWPXW&3?>_^-+Q9uP$!8$nRPYLX`EJdmT>CU>IM3tr zko)IK7m#qT2lF5BHZ?wUqag55e-~MQsrj7m#^%9gWxYZ(P?yXYhJ#x|4m*d>^1Hi-lc>kFJIaJn!!Ki{QBdPro4P* z|Cw7o$bMSjEtR-7ztD%b%8V8i$`EW`4464`ys#wtu zxE$PG##L8OiAffkDE^fB2B7Er!uPr>^CkP0`I4saIuYl;LSa9C=dmB>NuKP{RuSc8 zo^rov2ENP4--Eo?v{Ymri^e_W_Z)H!mkn=YHw<6#(!Cm|1{B;JQpXJquCPn$r1v#$Y{_TI>C(E;b4|tnC-!g*N zHpst@BhmJ~ICR!T*}g2uv43l{Tsc{`Py0o5`38Qpa<*K*{G7P~yxo`IDJ_@J5B(P4 zPV-&|-%F?R*@4@EyHa|UVJfFG@OILK>7gtLGAz}Kli zPAM$KAGZ(w?#;$8-@Gcf5AB!2e*WI~lY(Ps=GQ(9;AQT8w@7~N!vcKgvh+E!|G0d1 z;P0L})n6(^Rtx`dd{$qxtCuX#_F2H|KJ$)Aj!!M>h4uH?^YK7gKgX8~@{g{5dsxJdc|X!EUzV#X$Cn>=X8}LDqxzq6e7S&Y*9bfJoS5#E<0}j0Hvo^DH8{D5 z6kl5Oj~3v6`=%YmFf8uBD8@e$rE%4T@yHH2-jD6VZ*IfHr+Gy>&eQJ@_K0JYQ;z8g zp>H@7hmKJDh^)T`A#a?zXWg@o1->Jk<|o>(gx!2!isvU6PL?Xi{RDC8pz++Qu*U#- z!l_(b4o-P2Yu7RVeOM02@7++OMPSzZrY)R>+ROo(f^wp_lkTI zns5W~Akxb%{{D;Wf^gMZVK>ho_r;q^#UXGB*8}J4xn{%O>Y&k!64Lxq`Thwr_#=}0 zjfm$40E39Hj58bfRn*Ua;QoN^r}?Nd&IqG+V?}+YLEebx@qGBrbw_+^Hvycd-yypq z-+^AH>ezwK<;;J(TeI~q+JVRDJi;%0Klu6d0(X*=H+N^;1f1^&&x)_L`|k#81_D=G zfw!U)p=0dPPAg+d)jd!DlVABe#Tj^xU}42TAHM$;!sAj5(eq_%jiW}ArGwWQ`INi$KO-dtrPa&UOqTAUh@+RQZ%*FdB0H^+x-&4!q z`?P|m_P?-Fs}EOWFUGYmU}mOBi61;6^fTWK{`Q8GzRu@+P6?6y4B+v;fOr1&4=ZHMtDpBvWG)c# znhv?n|1LdQSf7{A`yWgdMY%Jk^K+gQ%OSc6=$d@{K4z>-E9-zk=N^;;B$Qa)c=daF&1G5#b-Kjj<0^FSC>^w zxDPnT&wI_bz7s3qLEs#JXUq3K6bC$1U%C4r;1|^3=8qMVC%|tn@$i1MGjfUTA(`gWVaB=l(N@ z-!h-(2RS%T7Em1Xx*6|l;{7})%f32Wot($cJpHjLL-_H(V4{cemh+?jIH>54?ckGU zTHjOdo8kJc+Q^&|gZ!yJl;!k7&!SK7RmrEEdHUHP_=hI`u#xNwN zcfwAVHRHEzFZtJs^CVC98>@T|XU#eH$ zf5z>N(L9{KjVkcxLE#g74n(%k%ukXYF`V zKgr-{fdBW=$BXhCp9A>rJ&y-L@U!n1dy?Py>;<2nBTfEZ*jsr}kKKjzY^g}eUblj8 z27l(ty``1k%Ok#W9-9h&qXHivp!JnV{}B40`i)dYzmX0;m4L>}%=e??bziGtH8@@g z&jz34zx}w6+D1M9@B`xb3!$gz#wjbK_P+q<``c-cR;mO;C{XE~$ttwxnfTZ6Doa5(dqkonal<*YbJYJO_^2^Oaz(e&Nuk0^U!QVc5 z!PUY(s>R%c_{#nwjr9+i@UTcmE|>lzzOujYfuB7*;7Lx;%UAXn+2HT&<=tL1Eid1p z=r8nM;jf)vdx{ow=H)B3Ux~x^YWGbg&F)wU8mZ0`n-H)e~}9Qqnjma zl}XOaSN0d_;9tA;&VBy=BTLadLfKysM)QbF^aGiY=lP53M`54b@6h~3hw~&)?S$Kp z1MmCXpZHbrIQX0THRb+gE9B#bR6eFLla}0r_{#mu4)CkZzc?a3ub(5=O&;+0x@p0{ zD@XadopT`lJa6|c75!QOa(zCldNQBu_sDl@c)zpuC*hav+Se;4=5yVotQQmb9h$wo zDoLBSA5TL+&eu(L@Ttrp|HkpYa=vc*_wL$S@^zCJe6ELAb)Q6CHwA!mKla75?lt7= zrX1khPi2hhbY8x0((MrTaz8ie-h2N1uAA8ZCh$+DkAFGgf4OdA|69R7_wtCU+W+Oc ziT&>azeUcoqWSng&%E9X{xws2@dECCe{mKt&3HJc! zcz>bG#G|niZU^p1dgsHxX2nT3=g;k7pl^BK81yStKJD)4cz1f`sV$6$38jjCHYAE z<#~Ip8c%NWbvos5fjrOK=TxgSTI~#HA1*uIqCENhqh4lRy7aVc9<&Wgg z{X?^5FUQ7&;(`v!-w!$N9~Q42yO7r>2+sn}?SJUeq@}Tvya%{;ukgc{@29lZNckIZ zp2x#m<+g6&_t=E(2hRP&qM3%S^7}oqP+xZN3;1=q1?+j^GhW#qwflr$-hO}5rGnPHd}Vty zf&WH>MQ00H^757K(GLDw>pCqcY|6`5wnsPkA7#HDTf~r;uWXNg@U3OLewD1thp%Xl zIpCi$^lMyH8_lQr1GmTMb{(hkqn-`>g}-?IV8w5lPxInGXp256)dV=I88tV@Myh6MlZn|F!5ZbGDzD&OQm@aoLLX zjT3*Cn?|y9kbDO8azC=mFxM~7BQk+=KheAD(A#QTSUfDB4V?Rlqa$Z`jFs>-;K{#; z@|P(5()BnA=lr=J`EgMfr#z2HfgJY}oi-fkE6*cRfpb4`^i9<&c^+W|o`&@O^rJt? z^N5^p{{PJ*JmB+pb26d#@{_;vokv&|`c;16hoKXTJ^kP25k~NM{J1etKjwd%M`WNJ zHpo3|ba!cf^N3W`2anrn;QQx&v?{-OgdTj}zvBbHL9e|h^P5Km5cjM<8~pE2tUjCH zJi_jY9_RJH3jZuy^>spi^9T$0T%Hv0>#pcjJHL5^L80FX{#z@5Z~K3lM`VD%cz@hi z`OPDetBH94Uv~zTqWz};&p=xH>m&W;c>?Fp?ca5|e40E@$c7xZ z|4)Z}yiT4cBp(v?ar=JfYV-B-JRuYEM(|plDPLQjC#2v!xBo$FIu?=V38}!j{eN<< zcA5O<32ERh9CfZ-e)9xwZyDhAC_i5Rzs(c4y=8)5tl#D}`OOoQ?M-!9_#>uF|1a~K zCn(#S5&SM&z9^mFJVDvsY~Zg>Kl68f^8{skO9Owtx$}tp<_XI7=Hv1_D)lJ8d4jUN zWrP32#FAtFFY^Tb5#gUXnV&DqZ=S&IEk=ZJ_%E$9BqNSeAkXszCw|L(nkTq%o)m*e=(Jg0fJ z(jR8<_rHJsrF{Gmuk?ov{8qiUe3Oqq@~ms6f&Zzkz&fQrXkM!H2iZ#T7KC4Xkhk#j zCiu<%AwI>MHdFY8ev_a0xw=$*N4EOEuBI$Q_25<1gGC|F&sDO#^H%!xT=~$vu#ku= z74Cx%T{XHhU^*FEpNR;ndxfV&>Rta}O-VEM@5C8a=_xuuW!+G5@AwMF0=nASg zItb4mA>xz$QncsI8*De>?3Z-t@ihJRE2(^u_xjxUYH<&e>-d-VxBniM>JR-fLCEnw z&XXrH&lRnhe2Q_^31K(y<6L)Lm-FhZ;-M?HaQW1F;8p2F=;%EoCD@`~j*b4O_%{RR z@_V`pI~&9odxh;FE*)f#59P5z?#|l!C1rma_6UEly_JUl@}^|3CJk~KNYnP#St0w| z3H_PCn^kS3=4+@>{tfa5LT;#C9}&Yur^C z=eWv&-nREn%kOuOvsI7oH+L)?ev$H~gY@fu7k)A!ZF{^$R(|!!`j7tB_FcIit&npd z4ODuehg^>Vl*3Jon2LTVLuCA6jSQ^6~rp1K`c7kWn&0!gFxmJW<%G zA93}97C4PV-YwDo)%_vt{bov!1BoJ=$Y1LJk`?|kfzRc!tA#w5XW^gEddlT-fzRc6 z;p$8Gxjf`=w$p@i@AAG;AV#vsT2-_=_IK>f88>8q^S&6ymt5=lvy5jUf9*+8&TdI* zQQxaDREyT%aiMjREN_6E1?i0!TYoIqryb|rDF4*ey%xyz=>pF7{noPSWvSh2ycUta z2fU8ImFURrjQpcVzr%RhR@yr<&g%|r|L`5=8FKlxr=sJzyX|6BKW|Xr9e*tLqikPr zqG-Ps@YY`2X_W0_`yH@<*nn0;WZb3D@7?g@AlZI9a1YWA2ZBkmeOd5}ANYcg>~liP zR^fyElg0Az)511A$8sDKo;F#OpZ!y2_X`tb{}=+%{z?4swH0!Ew*Y7RvKu}BLiUec zA>Z=E4^iz|3*3ctu>0tDNmBW_e%Zcffs*t(`G|df$Ys7O?6~)4&1tfIS-^RGT7TsH zYFU3)HxXZU_~|u&LYnM$$scK!gEtk&^oa3lF1X{8BkqFG>)yC-Pn7Z5_U8L1zc= zYHW`Gbmj{BKZM7a{uF-VdF7>?ld+v={1fI9ZUxTs%A4^XUmQ)# z{|H>21H2!d2pzX?J}7v1aq+N=Li#mYv_oD8>U`?OyYf1%>71~i{hxDaW7KyO4UlL5 z9=@BrH%=eUDqO#;pVz4lmDy1{HYFE#LqCs)?dv{X%KK}meEi)#FL=u*y|r5-$#Z0b&@#g@}<(u22!oVo|fwTSD^#{(8?Kg4xkQOL^U7wg+K1~4Ud7W?CxN-ex z{g;lg|6q3xc!lTn`zYR>wj&-cPq&G>n;fYn2^>SXEqg-^jmSB>%abywqpxP zxW15(=lOY(J?`ZgQM_>Z+>qyW&<77oPEgwffy(Cv&g-n*Zhzh{)|rdDCy4q9fY;@h zwL{`0+^5LD#K;XF$@%MoqI{gcv)|7z$@%9%uL-7lj|bxEcF#F|%M0Zo+wv&x_d~&Mz+E-2S-!@67*qc)UJWp4*=TdhT?H z{W(Fxxqo2!eI=W|A@$E1uOk1z&)!*b|KbK7Kziey_d97N{oMXof9#GaeP#W+ONeib zS9R7t)64pEIDhc=)cehnDCxK2Jok?ah7GHoB;$~GfR}iFTZa;6Rrm<`H}V~G?*AKI znpI6-so|?c2;nha$np4N_{?>n*6jyBFdhKT<4@g{4?h25Ri8G%)j7b!3nihGqt`Du z(8cO%1YG01F4_;r%c=TjKal$`(_hj4=``rO_vHBs*B{&8Vd}F2vB{)e^gj-Tymj55 zvv~cF;*0xtuD@d`iT5=6usGST@j{;UKlplLT{*tI@GsYIv-|U3mg_G7`5dH={#o&* z9Dn>B0=9of!bnS${eKJlS^wKF{`Nd7et=t%-oNbIBgdZ`{Q~!|uY9(9Bd@EHeQwBc z|E7C)P}ThUH!pZezy8-Y&Y9~U9ojeRueSWhg0lVq|Z^{KWmCyNNyOdz2Q)+mZIpNt(#(8|05H*yRGw<4)qjYQ=b5M{z^zXQBNp@Hdyo z1G(=9v}~MYW~NBVK0ovaz>B~7_E~v6)?O9%bG$t3(_>0uj3Xp(0M7n7n{{+c5eeu1 zp5;r|xjio4n43TM_jc$xd*{Ha1PM1`9Ap12*?#PR{5-ac^GEv6x$mZEC3)`8Isex_ zjeR1|SF<3;`ezSwdSv~6;My$Vhlg{tXA>p;2At>iUh(AD&66bD0(lE~$FF}$|)j=mLMh*aADsCNoo{VSk_;UhsY&e1C5_@Tk1X^~@~re(Ahs zX8CA!;pY#P>zPEMbxu346aFLoVnRxIXq{S}BK;2EpHr-ha(^fEh3ZkUPF?1^3-w|M z3>{=wI`p~!!@7?BeAK$54>-S<=lPb)D|s9a-w#vdPkL$n-3hrM%VYgr^{=pt%Rqcu zf7jtW{ibr6Ul;v7&);3s|GCUEAw15CeH47|^1G(!>m%rMAf5m8k7Dxps={;cZs0$C z>>0{-QU1Zdg+Dm|&yJq2!FdrLfE?eqs&akN1zEpwWc2!W=F>wXW%&%eUsrcs_~WhD z%I}ipO*qf};q{`0YRdB)D{!`N>AjsR<@pV-Q#rs>b^o!Z2JuSe&${xuH>_E4 zOz!$xtjec|b3b^bg5*;^7yjaSx?6K>EjgaFH-(+7zspZI7U$|$#|2wN`}=CSI(67U z(r{}BK$sr9^J^8Ckz_dIBC2|uj4ozW>C3P|3J_xEx6%T(=ll*=EsA95C? z{R)&G%W)9KabJ`3FX{WlE$45CoD1px*YEX_!eSN za{0JF$%4H4=^N|VuT;LAkA;4gj~k$kdjFqemB0O}>Re!joO{?m6l9R2=A$ZKI=gM&L7%k{_iuUP)I z0{-xR63T(}XR-WkVc*>s*0-WtHdi?e7iBf-NoE{zjqespk zBirviEd1+&p7C4PoaFT|Io|D@57H5R`{$YO5?@sX^@(`*gI^>5?BW7O;aC1k_Pg=^ zM6UlQ2^$*7HtLjLU9;#so12lDLyLVH!s*#A`i^kbsF z{ouv+zVax}EG!JiH_n?g1#jp(&yH&(obA`%6Xo1i_n(9D5^lhG<8dK>VL|=Y3BW`C zj&~w|-oIl3ziYeSJMwjkD2-@uCh+ax9ebEMhp#u}`gWn*Ztx}XJf66=%s7Vy2` zyNkUUSK$8;A6ekfy3}_)-#23Yh25wEV^(fgP)-zT#LB00AKv_+8xE9fN($h z4Lk5+(>l*6F5w(kIT#;b9h%Xd<0~e#|B1&mPPy+MHD){)lj1bShx^cemW|3Di z*4!de2#?Fg`H;@=QF-;?i};stjS2a4IZFLjtTX3DxbcCopXYU1C$^8|G7+8(JO$~u zW53@fk8>=~`fF8RtCQtZA(w_UdH7_D)Q`tGii`N;?}2|(`*+^T6E1%y?YTPk>&Nawp- zO)D8H57$4{J+)t6uXkbIm<|52*V3z$;s8NPcGxkl7;=Q4`V|@)EDfBlyOi@$g6MiM z3;L~)b08(0t{>B+-;@u(e>5%7j?!SiC%BVJRXH)VQ;XdHJ&i&zsZ?@gowqMwU5Uvga zuSx=;qru@ELyz)rRiXc>-c^r<{p=qv-lILW(Hku|E{RJA`O67?ddL-DqG~3`X9~`% zo{8(X4)+Rmm*+`YwM2gWyu|=ROjFt4X^`h}@~W%H<5+z-`*8lL(3=6?tldK^#{nmM z+%E_}bA4ul_h{nnmVA9Fv;zl;-t*Q1vC5c`44NBVf5UK;ccdT9PYioZzxeh#4yNtIr^^lF>% zZFTZT5OSPf7Tz1xdf>o&TrN33ANZ;#!oE+ZdlTjBINqPh!kPjS+GwNPj5! zauScHWKSyervl%8_VPt(A4bHU?I_egRj)c4HXY)lpJY!4XA-p^`JnvL zz|Um4X4{6!`#RE4pFIAKod4=09(PGzdsEbp{;BXs#j{_QkgsdZIM46Ru5+Vbd5$wG zuQI-D;MYFb?dAO9O9kACbacy#1$n+2Do?~ezroNdgPwYRd}&sAKYz&nN8uY-A&k?8 z;L-E_VYG|njdf07OFcgHy3gPhGK>M@Ala;%VjIXExmL+{2{*OvpXAYjkR9{$*?yE$`^Gp`$FH4Y}kPVb8V``rqaLAh~(8ytCAc-^lVt$fY3d zGv^N@_ZL*ZN`It+*JIYzJv=W6J0tXm>R0Ix!YIBoP|h^S^Ya`&{8rX)0Ov`b{KWgC z-6O;}y*=Zvx8(bIUYut?Pwf2VWZ91%rqQ{xq~pLD>jNH>~CE#-MC#YNU| zA!iyUQU`e7_qo)C*R`mubWmJqYeu&pH~0b%%}3RuUf3S>lXJ1MJz0wK)IR(BJ}ytV z-zp^JxjYm1FB-@`B-{`y?De9&>P-XhaC;=&0-Wb9$5zkr#_Fkb!r#0f#|~cQnvIU| zyd_*8iu`LQ{ybIA-=oO?-oekDa{eyhex&n0x%`1fAI?5p-&~Je{uV0! zcWU;khO&NMKV|%_kK@!bZio~9u^_Gbiowi%PS}6gKhE+$Yu~OW%iAI6LfYDLdbvE0 z_Tan@anq`yelE8c((eb(_HDYczZ;LQVZ5a1zq7z=T=CEu?$Ze8{o!1`iy2M!$mKI= zqU*n0~df{L0TPc5UBT+uif9eZ&F3S0P6#C1w`mwm2 zzh8k5y|b=@oWBcr7Sh*?Z~lkd8RgH{rJR44*Zn2r{0;HZ_AlJFprf3>7PtjzxhD6* z@8Rb7*TV01;HO5;|CZNfLixw&5O?nKqMgs`+dJm_^a|fXKF$L<-f#F=)v%+8?r{5x z>=zwe>O>i8HxqYgzW(OB*4-f=lLdLcj+$ELe)eY*`;}x|n;`7t>!^VPDlTnzIrA!T zwE_5>bRu-@*;01j&~as0Uc>z*ug`s0tb1p*nV6#e+ab^GuzBpAQ?ceS9B!X1&-)?& zYxh#rbIBgabARi6JEmN0N<==%?iGIXgZF#mhogAEBK5bC>wDl?NKfvXSw@3$2yHaJ zg!WeeH=$m%TH&AN-F|$5_cbt|;>QpFn!ro0P;W|A;=EFX}tBrz8_8Ag|{mH+G@#@Zo*=h3r3Y%S=XS`a@mF-dO2l8Bh zNgXT9lH?=x=K^ow?5cO-kU!NQzfUg<{ksP|!q(+EW0$SL5FNnd?8QeE`ov`pt6Jdr2sV zur}NuM*7bj_*GX(_@~parazST)2KbU!Sf=ufdA32MNmG_sZypHaoKhYHt znV5z&$N5O^-T3^LOxcccJTKaC%f~jUmbWZ@RIDUtMPL}R35gU z>$mxTNoS<^*LWcpKsuz({6_NgLy`S)h$H)F_UTdWKUvtx@lmh$&f7e0Q2sg4YXYy{ z3su#{5np64k5>Wcw}N-i)c$;UP!^#O{!4tGpE$sGfd8tsRmJcmOX5@hR*rx0-d}k9 zDBq_bJb?4ue@*W@=)=-xp@i`4xuTvJ|16>SD7A#^iVFL=|4Co8b91bOn}D-_I_l3q zi<9si~&%O69Dg%q3)aI!3*J$_C6Le6+0g}aIMSo&GeJxotWPk;P-E?^|>XF_ZE!j z+#kQS;;*N2Jo0#DFDCqYZq@KEa(i{*JjZkAc@rXd5NsL|a^xd!)+iOkkpvzXkeC;H8aQ7WMq9 z9p^dTn%DXHjRIz&fc&dNy>R)pua>(b$D0T89B)VbCzIuPa{>1wePeWiq6H=WSvb$} z*6>t|I)x-$TSC~!@mA@NOaB!H9&Vqo&&BgT@DCIi{a%rL;!O*_1-yED7CI{A#+$|u zoXaz;MX{~&eA@vzH_|ozGG49-dAiTZ{Yw_&&V}m_FZh4Ad9g+%{r`NQljp?&@PBOZ zu$Vqs6?IU(XnCGmQut@(Pq(&J29I!l&XVKu)c9><K#uEqai2}M zrR!FW4f0N;eH@jZ$4m0*it_#b{isU`63*8ddhC~dGJ05rc$>&S6t|Iin~%$hw8Jl& zPxyI8!H%Bi>A_Q#7XCSXe127)pGy3AAL=)V)Cm6g&SlH;{&<<64j#vg4g59*KWfVJ z3Fec3o#3Z|SF&U2WjwDS+=ugAzwuwzd#{jQXdpZYoa1A)Y2K*9xp<`C{|cGj`+eAo zp3TxX(NB`+`nO@7w@Af*%g5!)Ys@;~AJ+fFsVSv25+1;HAjkj5pI>b($CnNAPNYwE zj`Q*LEalJr1j~;aKR_$BA5A*sd`Ms4{AX5zlt0G@$6rqKf#34_g&ZG2$g9c-djg+% zBJ<6VE5e7&=XGs8_?yqTM?^M^`?`c>lO4bVyI+zET?WJ$u?}#q4iKoFGOx zF0h`+arfsZ4y{}c1J*e?ZnASiPgv?B`ZYPw>&5!kN$-FxIj(sygXnU>xb@Zzc@m z>l^Y<0O#31l@_%9imz)3=jR(8us^oT`9W&op0Iy)<%M0G|0i!RohrpyUP~$a9o5J0KS|c_=JFx^_PtD>)bHe8{{wH} znD~_IkJ>RmKNdh7ouW(0rKIjFH{iUlQ{FByVOq2Z9$4t;?0dM&Wchlwh zGGD*h(N2uB9qYLrhRPRtzK!o!xS?ld+fH%ZcDQ_0pP|WB`2MRG>Ek_X&T{`kcoxoc zKd8R0jpua>!h=u6^)%a8)bwH0b2f&GLO;t7kMHn6o@ZEqbG&p~w`Ml4Uy^=1aE`~L zZJUNR6Xv!@EpQjoV}&o5=Y7K@@4^>FJS@VE8{?4N%*B!-NRRsnTVA5+306e5kD#5_qaInFkjEJ z81ebKgZoz}_@y=%m|2X8NXai5(4PTb^`6V#D=y(doacH=EPZcs3CZs&y(mA|i)oz6 zP*TG6z}fFBvXeh41)R#O$GFM!B{TTLYOfnuS|43tDz6HB8+fO(cK*WO#UVTm=Xv~S zyW_;W{Cr#(PZ8H+JReESxSu5V8<~)g*yCw_Md}wc8NjoV&TIMa(6T6}?0+8LlPe4V z^q4xg3_nlDR#AD(JnsYV!Ak$)DhLG9r(9RJf%nxzw$meL3IDykNek7 z$Y&rWoc2xnrQgJN;(ockr5LAtW|0z~@?l(V4GVLud5>L=X{LPZ?fO2cy z93|^d$N3=A!&RE5X~>w+LHap=RaIf9?V9s0&q)a9=YrgLzuMuIlN~Z{hMWiYx3dBV z6S;pTc^l&mg+JR2YuJOw3psx$cukt`xFC-c4m_8^`=wMbzn8&vM)E$$Wn+Kr-N)0) z$o>feH`NsR7cefi%J#GWRMmw2?yiF>%J#8;^uX^Hnw~D(mx21>@=f}xI)kvw2mF)t*>z?ArNjOp@D)cM{40-( zY@e#Su>ZZokNzzn!Xq3XdYn(LB=TvcUS3_^&!~rfGkA~Zx|$V=$j7PzihV0K@HqbX zxjYs07#_Y?L-v0<_^khuzqdVCf9`XA+1ypP_he>65t+X3OpBClyV!;;uK{{|%O<~vROY<A}d<+fY4pZ$}A{;+A0_a@5mmRw8NZ-jnli%$1t`z+;ze)jK)U-yra^`}5S z1@hi&@12qC*Q5ex`zob%`c}5j$T-r0HxpxJ`?8@o1NfO6*O&9WP>w%6`n#Xr{LnA= z*V&Lu2cFU9*b=!vW&f~z*AZFo%JRnA!appps<$n&SCsN+|8RVLKl$VyIlfXM??e7~ zm)h6J@x}67KkcvAm?_s!2IRSZ;w;Su$n}#6JPmfvx;QCE_Fo$CY^1yH-fJG^Kb%jl zBkX*<`1%cbKAjBQ2>kc#@BDl}OSYf=_rm9%4zmAJA;(&>3n~T^3R0bnZUE--z>)cTo_0EWCI`HghO7zeD9xTRkGb z@B=}ibCa)3|2Sz-#g~D{rOgrL=I7;__4u8uJ8YM#zOW~V_y6x0(P_6@PtsyNJc#_V zb_+dv@IRgX_Ildy%VRzBmGAF2ga53abtcbC!pcK`sGd?3^^^)eaYFXRIqPCyFWyIy z^t4b$u6$_zt0@1Qt@~wg`AJ^iDLM|eA0L@2%d1`x_Ve{|z54EoF-F0lde;Nz>)#EP z&sCQ1Q<;JD{G@H_gsQwQLUE?8C(6(MwSixv{k}qc-71$S2z#916~AA9ghnqIq)%BN z8Q=|h^JF<%|5VgRp6>@_g5R~Kwze|PDNdF3K{->LrgOa*g}*o-BYww-B8LA`oLX>R z$j2sVM~iy!eJJ9H-|sNH_o}MuP`TwJWM`i5K)9gqr&)i8-%Bg!M{(pT99_@e==|fA z`8#KdawOf#+@9ZhpE8cM4TRkz+^6bNyO;APzbW%4d&qBDD2EC1+`jGjE$bn_IdPuk zDgJoAW-lemJ6OADz1;8kz}Hp~c*{nU*5;0>t0D$79xSC@*mJ>ODQ>@;f2#0`6GSX@ERm&_Zt(=3VDX z>>Ml42ht($Lu!Bb?pC>cmQG^5$OHN6Urv8do{y^<3HvO_r|YeRsQECLKed=Be>roZ zweoz=40#{k&(Y&)>>znQ&iz782_fIM*p(^r{S>Dn|9)S0tyvK5f$BdUxVNy7-}_+3 z3EnRh!Xx__cb+RZo?_{hdzXHyZEOAw;wL5udEUpkqWQMc&P!W6Gp>43*w6bIpSEm0 zI(7K|FMzA{z>m<0(6Rerorf#m{JI+bPxneX#x|)}Idi7@Y_mGj3P04~;Dp?tZ90^Z|Ew5%uivD$?y+UYkSf zz4AePGx)sEE{NZKcQ=1qx!z0ucVHiBa%17AUZv;MkoL)G%s9{2zgq`?vWVApN!|vW zmWbdlub4U-^=?BK;(PsG117OxWKR#QwEYIpe0}=MN|J=^^K=+-Di@ z`yzW&aNdUfd6k|&Tq0kurvlH!I_@W17Ek5tb@}=AfJM}!5AmA@x%U?&+e?Mo2gN!c zWCyRCr=Xo?fNyN~)0oJF2Le=18}w#@cduhyhCI);REi!?E+$usWJ&V6rtllmxnr7j zlIOX4=(hszZQAe$&vQvWi2lj}{ORUaW6H_p1MUX?Y(YkQeoq^XH_CpUL}?sULCy=g z08+wfo}4ZH4wXZlHbV3(b%+o;roG;_-s_{q?bncB6Z9rwXBy^*JYRnH$E`m9mvP$+ z`Sb~;wo;>wI5G4;l{Zr{KBaz}9B9z1D`9kyAAR8S{A_56y9qIR zLPdOAW(YZ+e{uPL>U6lPS|6rG{)Fp=^KT~XUb262(OB>ZH{v|EXS=INCePz24zrWDdKm}cV=Hxr$n*}|3iHDGJ$)Mrb2&)b#$*-b6&myJPXov@T+C_T*~*`Sc>$U z@V)yW(oFET&se^K=atMS`%-|bnhX1%_Nja#UN0Dgr(G81Wq-eKJKHw~xNHxXFXt!0 zFV2qU*AIbrLs5WbiVsNW{do^b3|$ef9Jlo!)RU*!^VVC zYRAg>CpbLcMjWO>-U_|x_$}+9d7~HSg?#Sw%h~gVA2{wOjdefHuig4ii1PAvat`!0 z(cFGLzjmvyCHPzpLrdWo%AcNhPSFaSWa;4ca_(``J29BwP`vQ-&Rk9h^c>k(X;ePt zj8~R39ejJz;l-Sn$Wi!LSx&;pzgEa)B8|wl5_Yg%#3%piaGrjL;!vGZUtHG>q!XdT zRk!NLcPq_nME_Hq@_S1hYlI)l7oA=sCP=8jGhYz$4(M$+sow*2Fbs#~-QNI*{I?rg zOqS)nkV{=H^q(%#eo~Y?@Bq>!*;V_;O8Rqf-qcTwvv*duK37=6EguWLy4J!U&o52i zS_F8g-XiboWBcq4MR|WanJ|dUA*>Ph^7Ers=-WK1NTaCoV4cDR-0=CM*W#q|7#a!v zEZ=hZ;(#pgX%LOqDE)F_8TUhP7Sa(<8hT~@9-P;<5%$hD)taY~^T&DK=V*Uz$7}Ht zZh`$4@UDF{vP3}%H$lH0xUbZ@>}25NPxrf`ox1vn`f!1F(c^AaG*cCI5Z?j5^Gi`r z9`GG^<{c{Li=xv!FTo1F9r^>{SMKpRP&^|q-#b;5#{$0AEc{~Ieko8QJulw@zILpT zGlAbmQ>0VLw7mSBcLXmB?_ITn->Bd8j-{M=`5y57NZsHc&>t97IyEof0G=26{ovo* zI=H;fmY1)^{K5r(4*0iXrVJ~Sl9wOA_`>6$p{?-G^+JD*Dr?Tm_kz#kf))HF!BVNp z{rcf}Q1D&g7jeI|wY)yBekYA*G||=H0tk67-u-Xx5f0RRVXNwgzSk|# zh>w{fCB8Dgz2Fx-S+8z#Mqa)$zO%sZzVUf%(e%80Wqj+}3;PF@DDY0Pw7h&}d|SZ3 z>oPqq?##5CSc?3wjBgY8JAc?$F2DC-yA|c3lIY`cv_1hHfDpk@KYFBZVSfP)ve@?c~;!F9ko&W#x3tcZke-Np!`ia_V zDop4gzxnX~lr*F|j~I`7zVWOf&$9&^{5M7Um~VVZ_~-1pIeYm18ZzGmKKsQ6eu10c z-%n&BQtDTdfu|uY-?*PfUSIR!JkKwWpF1~?-zz}&DE$)zf6vcbTk$$0XG?LQtPjG% z^Kq`1PQpHpHzR(_bxZR_3(k{#$PTp&_fL3@;D=?U)U~X0PXX8DVE&UmM2w52^}m0h zHWM0_k5e@ke&&3hJ~a&xXc*V{ksr@b>byL8YK&Ph$d6gT`98<2%@1vA3HJckT7-SK zx39kxE8zy5SIrgktU)z4r^HD(&lfG=bt|6Cs`oTjf5{f*r&;yr2Uoc?M(u|=F`fY0sy;Y$ZD#_GdxD8Equ_P3DF1nw+`{#cpc^5|$$TUD>PuBmEAOw7 zKLUz4v4KxIsr=SDm_I{r+OUPKV~`=?Hk6OsaWmuS≈8pt!K9M0vS9nb2?4#%^Li zKwUV$4B**F3odNCko`gV>AMMi?C;9gyLRLCAj(haFEjWr4l8?u89shEap?&8FQP96`nrtC+S9@`KMr{0JI>s1 z|NYO2(sI9@4mrNgIQ_VoRc$8euzrmXIMmt8M< zTpK#*+GEJ?%_2N)Y)<=9N{1xOB{I?%9Sk2>= z%r}C^_9gce{wXHK6%ZC`Ka(wG(6QX#Zw{Pb8{ezQ1XMA1+>gsFCVNqfZg`vi~QqdfmzXCwY!L z_K$k4VQLKgLbwg`9KXl9CUoX?V8YG7ok$&3B$HK=#$Z_t%uJCIUl|`p@I7+_f8;Z7 z$+I4B1AkXz+pYY@ZDo97N}fE5%uyUNOH-Y&Adptv^woP@F-I z`;&T;-{%l9_O z`YpgY&Od3~%^}6H#txj@i|^16M>tN&e_1HE3%pG))H8B?63+8$5Af+vHE$#!&I$M9 zeCj8nKbbSRZ~esFc95Xu{chOjmIeNe2P+0AnaRt!M<|XG^!Of17E*0*;h$$cdoLGZ7S!kE2XViF`F8N1zP0W??{8o!(yv_icY}X9vEmQ3-$dE( zr6~G6Klr4R{Ke~4?5{lqW_C<86B@QBUgvN`JY*f4PZsPd@(2bDzWy{(w`dqp;D@{aYT)Xk{B5nG^%qLI@h%BOKa-i>sB!t_%`L6GzJeRiSE94E(KWs+R?ee;nAMYb|fY)??%_B5E(?Rl?)r4M_FEVO&HNKuCoZqM8 zh5Uf$?RUxL58yoSOS=7fn>BLz+`w~?-mLvs4qwZJ%a7~O?5d(1`U}&Ja!e6!8X){* zh5b`z_4-@R-wK?|-?vxbxtzZaxC80@-$wP8{mc9Q*uIUU4`<5y-H`Jly?J_jJ-Pl( zuqyyOY5W&s^Q(V9>Zf9x?sH}Rx`Dzz7wW%w?ctMT|CoRW>xzDCYu_K+$>op4SGw@u zf+3!pvVI5T?a-gGYWG07{*&>&H1>b?u+qFTUFMt8zk&!{XaRk50UkofOGvWHQGFKeC8luD|q%1O$N#KyMa4^ zcWAh5tL$I)p9lVX_;a^|a{PE9XMz8`HCG;z+gEb+==PJ{^6vep@4N3UJx)pGgL zABuX_y(;|BVspz0QTgLLE+*iwjcIC=^AAA375Kb{tvku}oA!a||JeWU{p51X{&z!; z{lBntyA`tklNIt;f1mh|EFVzFf1%#_w=ACnoa@g&;;&z2|0FBoqr-$hBHvdCxBu6o z|cHk$PN6Q`PweozsVm)`)`)^(ZMMD zA;vEhyJeLKW`(~pNYp2$dCN7f7JK3cpTFY6@Iu~esu#`zY6Eg zNT0mgI7Kc$m(POyHMS}voWD;~cU#e@?^C4%R}B;PZF{Fm)bsC#n<8Hy_OWhx(|$&S48rXb z{R79}<#UfR<@mQjFZZK=KB+Q7_8*S}PVn9io{IKQS&@G_@Y{cWSXc6ohWl~OU(@)| z9XbD?BL8>SJ}4vS?*pzHF6=+B<6Vm!A9|eUe*CXv$C}CgxFsd}I;P;21p(RrHidlU zmzsZ{Uq5a}In3ZYkv?6xZOi}GkGl{z>EJKe@$+JCpK>|$&>sNran7?TazAcE9B4-f zKa3bLD6;*M>e+{OWB~rq9k?d<<2K+H;2#%zsg2x^`_K>DfmiSO>>v5LSugr|7w{`v zAH2oSwbFI4@_LkPqxA+8HDTC7QkR56R?!yn=@Yq0Y=F!sryFa==X#(*> zcuew0VLv}_@kYxsNuT|tKEt>XI6rSu>a)Q;CX9K;^6C`eRY@Rp=(4wudR8MXNdJe% z-^l(D-x+cLk=MWW$BsLy))OoDAbu+J@qOzw{5~<_;JVn*K+AJ_k|KVd^uG0sI_~!j5zxKQK0%3GeT$t^`U%W0ltwKhR7^A>xzQOx1 zvp26KtW+27OMXbz5#M%l9`aKVC<+%@Fz$h7Xw`&+B-fD1V2v-t-A8 z*=DNWAifWmUQyUJHN|Y4H{pU8_QWNR685l+>5uf5a{01RE+crKr+oXVoPQ?p6yTYU z4-e-$qVlKWJg+l9u3xl^ypO^=SJ;&X-jU7;edEod1SGG=`fUbqeU-J5`x1onK3n|? zVc*38)t{(SbLH88*^pnoX@e$K!r6Z;-!Jn8yDZQ9Y#D#6PuKM_ZhS-dF9m6#0~c1v z`jc@!73uooO+Jc~@=s%V-2YeKtz2It;h89R26)}QK9?3a#T)Mf3|<%ZXMz{=tEWw( zP56QT5})@0s?Lh`m<|4gqU$Oor7%;Z#OLP~wEqeH`ZtBW@9g+%Kk+^TG*e}Ys{N89&o!MKK0wm{)Nud`lX)R3FJ8+Cw|L% zX#LWS^CTbgL*%=e7j&9T;*LzJogP2&v)jO90^oB$UNAfOVCEZj*Ry;Ma2~@JU%p;+ zK+aJo%j@0}b_GE1YB(g&i?pqLh;_8*S>R&-Ph1PbWghp#;_5XXQRUOaF(zSe^>hZfuS#a_m>W25cs@rC{9 zhS^Q+j2nQneYZOoEB4^yse^#4Ex_5nO^@dNQDsV86PC9FXZzMv`SOqV)~svBxC=Pj zmvN?jPrui_nDu*rccc@cqi64r^_vUz57Pf+U*x$n)Zd;$DUC|L@liOu3D1H&$Ma^@ z?D-Q{UkPtV49lkq``NzBx&j~7sx_k%^s5cP*}g5)TW|c$d}|ZuZvoEsc}AWcuTLrH zVcZU!?b~qpech4&`b=W|F5uw|Lnl|wxl*w7f)e3K4V6!$!uucW>7u=zJN5Cy_;ivM z@$P}V4m>}8Uum;-VM3bV@n32md_OS_<75{2kJSx3Yn{v#De?XAACG&wal&8iKO1UD zOwG&BLOgo$9H0gK8C}XfNU}xq$^SgAaD1-2HThn*HVY~clW-5@x&CTj`J{K-j8`f# z?g!5Gx6`y|rb_$#A#imTaIU|9>n6PN%jzEC{vureFw+kxBhJd1XM@K4Ih z{WarLbGh_iOz1Kq4yQQf@yz~uqX?P&7~+NxJM?9b-QK+H)biX8BhQVoJ;wX{K8SG& z8S+!sHPMf=9|NuHj*$JB3BBy6om+0aDf^N2W`ozE^V>Jrk7TzhQOrLxfG1Cc-NW9# z8i#U-(uCtuV^|ekukSp)uaV1RgM0w>v%|P|fLtCYa6R^kSuTHGn#)7>rUU1FA7{S2 zew^!-a364DUeV+e7eVlTeQ}R7Ucz;L_;Zr5v#5Q~w+ZfuzvHs3!ai#&;g=du z4_#DY0fF*2Lyqes_3_oZF}d;@8*ujfmpvbt)DrFl&gJX1s$JiB2~P*k*H_0@dEb%B zr||*jb~Cx&)k#`OJ_wxSVaw@p>O=|G16NHJ_WR2ZRwqd~=gak1V)fsdF^K=L{gC7O zbH2H$np(nbz`6eR?3~wJz8-J_=lXM&yq+On59ooXBOO-OQK|sSNAa45I5nbvec&B^ zf9(E(E{;@@65oUGx0xUp1b_AXmIDeo^73;qZ*rjjOr9eA)c>VSZQ=0jAXg@=AL9r= z|7`|;=CaF+i&%5H^dIqg9Ev>u4Swm$>o+D_^745c;^(W=!Ed&z<)osfynG&qBF}$= zU+>=WZN&_E`Mf_N2lGdjL)g1w{<%BFb$R*9>j5M9_dm;7P(mAhJwWRX);gj+@q1}) z;FIQ1JjJj+9tShaHT3MNyXzj~8Q}9c^n0!doZSzJFQ6OjY&q9PX*4`T?;?cTpzf%7?)q2iuwsp zJVHXZ#@2e{kB3E`uzV(PUK<>EX6}kJA1?0#Jcj!Nw*U4Z^_Pn;#?)XuTT#Bm`k7~& zPG4G@^(Rji_J>b|PJZ#-*-x(@NalH}Ci!smc%hm;Xr|mBr$AnXer4mQJGXIv8fx$H zM&R6ErQ&zmvCCTugrk&7A`aqbqP*N+rGfwa*SfUJ?*UVb+E2YwDW2!6HV+deL?jqa~#{et@|p0|<4 z@VY7VBu^9en~@Su>&{l`H}O5__gIes&l?MUq5U+IM8D{{B<2~1Q#St)pG>HjXL+EH z@56jGjsfh(PNyF34peH9ADObngi}x%|YZ zbr~bh3;Epl0=OZ^`}VxPDG$^{k`D4qwxS%Vl0NG1Ja~Ug|I-bEl=t&hb4@qe7hFPW zXuR-&&(|#rQ)bmT`Qpbpj0b^pf8_hU%{xyHAHD-zt$JVB#r<8cgu?IEN!%V;S74m` zs}D1(Z~1Nb-tQnEm)%JChu6nC)nw@KwwbN;Nq$f#Yznk_i~CzsEO{Q0`B(WIA> znyx7yem@i0mkyk->oRArTzcQXWhs~62b}#gq~8ZWbiZ{vTume&1kV2HUiV?m=l^Ag zyHCPZPGLX$XP$H9OSkpeyl$b^18+ zHpsJm9}bq=MppW2lkINzt?w8VFZ z7KfcoL>$C7BR`IRGvxD+|IqUhsGn5u+BV)Ed5=lRznXNM=lOl+vHy>;?+$FT`od1z zqzzq!U6w{!kr{?iK{S9skYU(GR@h;O9d_AaNkB%~Wg3>0B>@pDL&K6Hs~|{0Mr4L1 zMb?*_`<(V9?f3h>{K2K~^PF?fIrrT8zIju>pi(O<6nH9dTHhC{zwMlg;Tgc`y`>5D zr*>6m<5~INO{!GvooQO>UiPQ|+|Td-WEmgwo9x&&qEKWA#vh3KTqr=wJt?sJ#?7kCQJ$;_Fues7KR zcho)tkDDs}q`cZwWZzM7zY+B-^(6!C8~fXj{xK7{DjxC)C}%D$x165W7VYZJE8|1; z+rSIYQ>nR1R+IIwuqP9KB!TzCu009tISXY%jMPWta9EFz>XQN??|~fEcVK9>Zroq> zH0dwdyP{*gBXox2mrs*%B6-!dxF5N^4)R8n8wdWE^}bsn??(L=;1h0Mx^hf*9nYwwU7myxPNZQQ9e}nmPzON-~mqlU2C|iFt?wcQ&LZtaVWPX ztPS^HhwEuOr5&RRA3I5BUEF>nc;jByo=WZL_aF7s`lR8I0)@DJcF5W8$>)If#^imL zn|)63hG%ZS$nA6EIz2}lXMCS-MV3?!VeD{Wb#6e5x{V|H*zGctr=_oK1Ud z;UD!&8ZXxEm|ldhUsKKm_MdfS_U+^L+o6~2kKK5b|DLx>|3{#Fr^Sorb9pDpqg-p6 z)r_~l2iM8}F|L{w0{ovT{ipeD#_UP|hHFLZ$#WVt-iKj<9v%2Q?!~)k9WL3D?+EhO z2!8e7mwy_(9vAVW{%-?sMu(LF&&#WEo#GquSbc@Z*Ng9qQ~w`TcG(Nwzih)~etMwi z?$I*u^Z1$0$@r4IwL+(VxV&ywV0`xIi(d%UN{@y8YT!ncrIvnvHjLpGT&MZ&W~QT3 zB*V#nJ9y_VKZuB8cn01ZP4<=iDC#3_AI)>revUqEjNCpq^mLQqBE$2kAfC?5u(N?>J}2}hf%oHzao+`ukJSHx zci6r11}#s8Jgs+VeEGv!>;xYl)pMoaG(JSWU!n~kA9TR8#>aLeKIY>i{f?0lyt?5B z|Ka1K%P8B=0=($PcLCpL(KZdlAFjXBk;VzX|B$n`l)TU@U2f7Droi36ozU~7NH0AZ{fRmq#{}?%t)vrvvAnl^{SLcPle#G0) z0(n|L{kQ3hO?>>Z1E=-L&g5CIdHXnlQ~b5HhI#q;ZUpW|`CG)4uH1hQ;^P5cso>ms zd_An5C;d-qBmH>%=+Ajo*Vb&ItU!2U~X2o>;UG&7U;BPqdsr z#^R^4Q~l6$_}9BnS$-?y@E+>;;&Od-WpL$y__`ra@y)x|e3-}A1DwX6nv3rgV&hZR zd&Ij=ols1)TdO@aqo;SW>=ys`*&m{F$oSAcdu853OV$kO;@>9<+z6cZ*}j*=7zeLX zH-UVp1^6~`!T0%0wXpTg8J+rx|NG>#-Xl)+KaD8({ruK7vd-O|LG^onuQI%D@kJFN zAL0(Gf56lmnpORVwk7=@;M>Io-=|9K=1muO-?NDSi}s1b`kd}}=|8*KjX!s&n=k#R z`FBK(eFc?zAsr}B`J0h<{T!aZ7RXclr|nYw#OD{PpYD_8f4h2Jm?>Mo6Y`{gbNe%= zlnkfeX?BA*wSS=^Du#P-o$j-J*1JR#{{3>&PyYWmZT?)YU%deBkMiENJd+}rej~1v ze}`U{IH_hhtzWdb&pW;M``5$G(myeO(Dza-&|^oLGUxJj`X0Mv%k>rU?eNP9zO(ew zF_8vhX6X-CgJ(pU4t|eitzPB!{cJn(h5D2FTj~G3ANF6Nd5>xl`J)Cu9=yx{b}1jD zl?;JfaGlyO|DDchu?)8Zr~G>NBCb9?uP6G4_l+EvsDD_WhdNu?j=U5#`0x-n{{qs?^!M`ir_x&j<^s5(2|NIA=KB1%Auf2c!g7OQ~ET zH7-8B7$HyoMSgXzG0%U>Z_1C4ORoHijXx@TkbIs6>M^{3P<}hX`+ezO`}q3Ejq4P@ z+26Lh&eu1jpX%RT(fcXa?}5B}k&MHPJq^$C^^anUoEOReOR1MD2KWy-((gQ0ygv6& z2i$^kX2zy^YORQ_96zXkQ2(3U=9Bv2dWrM?VTZgEWxr*;#^=#W9{nr$nmCy+HjHa- z@H;g6ZfI`jX2It%nc%05EB`0Wlce9D&xn_9v5ePm*AM66^Q8s-jPgORNi4wT>#Tg+ z1*PRCJUF%cYeTB|Q|PDmwn2a59|JF`z!kU)*QvcXTzd3??}yTXlYG6i%ZkuGO~@PJ zAK5p4)X7hIzGgx`Zi)2ok@xRB^gbRTPwhqW)ynq$o396Hy_W#_=!3^b@%0w1_Xv-A zW&V`o8N=m%gY1tj(D5zzpZ2q~9LvTk@AX?6U?1>Ilu^g?cjxsd;d)$> z^nX^7(jW5mU_7qVdh`6alT+AwMrj=>?Wgsi@#q}tF8=nlL7w{4x5b;?CxVD?5^%Er z=g-SEI;M9J$ zU6b~6`_h5adj9x|hcmc+#ugYKkmq+}YY*n}iCZT9Bl|zD^}`}=Up#Qi(-Tdu4r2Bx zz0gm;JN93Jok{4vvi%`X?SH9G(dq&151iV6{DfVddHW{-ccH8{C;uSser z)f5(gWyXZS{Oo<`R()!H$Q|Y zq21%b%LMO4#h9Py_iZR1f}b^?(73ol#%J-8^S{tOhxnrY1n`XD6)S$J7XLn&4cBSD zTRWud>;jnY{QVy|jqigE-Iwy;Eq4K@`F3%K%>@f(&zIpk%ulpFOb37QMfYEYwPdL* zMSV`Jk21mQr+=j{0-nHiE2Y12h*$jfru*X*TbGf1ePV$;`E&Hisp;WN z-U!@|vfFQ0ZWRR{5P!_)PVjo1FVsl9|CoOSKX^WOgRfsvv7`TC9VX!SAN#{h@LGI( zR6i+Fu<8o_}AZw!IHkGy>0>FKK_1I!^zT??22@ za$jp-CFA_`)Q2nh{=$jtZmcVs4r$qe?Jtz{d*(FXeCAqff+_y-#shik&kds&T;cs$ zy&C;}j$G&UFEKft@4s}wslOK)QKJ~&AGx952wwQFrJB&bMa0*F>$Lw`_^w_%`hJnX zJ@Cs8UXQ;{KZ$||0(auN4*QnlCG?hPhP#1Nf7six{IeK_>u`QY`>)-TwoeQ-%Lobm zYT)W*8HWSUR^Ja}xDMCp{I*=XiU%SYPUoja@LFYbofyS%I-jNbKbf+3F0bE>`t6X9 zd->BeUO(w~0-v6@fKtiy8*zR~^3F~Z4sv-9v;9{TAT=mALRSg5eh6cHmlNOKUW6Uw_WpAA8WwPVlyU zz2tsuR;DZbAI_)o&kg?bsK36*YmhwpSBw`H%3tJRCivS|om{Qa6H}IgZw%^By0tQH zTW*fulusMT_vaV(#|hvS>Hl_Xe((ft$93vo-zr{|D!_0WA9Oee9{qZMd<4VYkf-r? z%7yV))C^Y#^^elS4*nCy@paOEs{csDlzd8td!Szj-n$a3R_9^35!Y#aZ?tv&!$^iZ zA#VZi(g!m)6wJo6_CrS%@{{rLsBJ&a`DU2-OT>rzFU^-JFTXEB-=F3E*A4y6TFyVl z&#yeVPW`w2{LhO;qFsf2R{pP-ahP#4V<4T22%P#a)xT&}quRWF>c2+F4HU1;Jy6#*ANx+kNPjkx0pS)HMidb zIrRqV{|~R%l%@T*@ZSzx2YlJ;xeX(jejRWl@V~zwy@I~q8PFfG@3er|Ej+UqofDzy z#d9<{_V0G^x9e)vjMWfRmZCof&-X6yPwqVV2d(=^O88^JI>iItpOp@INv#jh%E#Xz zG@wl5693s7WQae7Jmn+x7xVLae+JB_7|#0D z@ETbAPvh%n%15gI*4nVkynf2ZbjVM*f3G#KpYkOWc$~h}ZN7h`d?fjY&CV9(^6}pV zju-9Phgab8q(1??LzVO1Rw0%mew2@7|J&(rZQOnv`>A)`@X*@Pye}VT`c`%;-a&AK>UVoeu{z1>#v>iWk|1+UC9=z*IOPA*R6T06) z@zpdqyPe0!205~SOvaHPnf=O?HgX*n0-x?ryfPF2_2-`p@^n9VV5PTz5m&@Fo$Q|~ z{iyfgQa|n={my+7{HWLAueaR4xJ^>dI9-AmKO3%-|4(Wy z_j3PSWIuS-Mz^}k&o2@X9~bcQEel_!{jV4g|E2W~o%61k z_AFn(d=qrOs(q2<=JTNo`qNS7`%PVi-bXF$qxBHkw`utEpZI(mw^jN@?OSPo<6~TZ zCiKRG*K+^S!FiZ}3Aj%Ck;KvM%klL_669^*-I(~>TH4=>_HbgoLhIKg@RC;6npH?k zEg?(cj~#p$ct4kHc9Hh^0{7rL?ceh)d~ZJA-&?TnwLs6?&vq?}LOuR?ZIkiPp`06k zaS-kQdH%R(N}dtCp-qe5E*g|Tf*(9zTfo2c=;y=!8?ekpQNIrB?IiGqHJGx+|K(sG zPv92p-`&7Fu1`wyKSU1PIYZjz0scwz*@yjK9tKY135|EVm#-_v#}nQ6QeF)`^G$JQ z*m$C%_lT)6UMfCnJBE*^M#x)G4n95i9v=_X59R*f1NkDO{&~pjcS6nx-ql9;*XCBg z6Y|UFHg3S{cSGKT@<86Rb9w!CTvugfvcCmCp<>{?lD<-&(@K5W&k@AqdY-g3seE2dgFYAVFCBev z@i?aTka4ExFs`iH<%r%V5-{(0x!pYi%rg7nvH`oReHTymEFH1O_k__!Od zKVf;GeJ_&_V-M$bdvP@`hC`OQdY=k z*rmTsp0C$Y97S7;PXM2OmkV;WQ%>BWc9(294kVP4{-uKV+tnIw-v0D{Ai}Tqm^YH+ zUdU;7$~f#8&?k}iGhOLG{Z*?rYs%&IkTaoty>fd7?`MXf_En8<|D56@+TRK}2g-t{ zEz|hAAO+W{eLk9U|I<7yfAn~7DaAj1u}#bMtIJ6Hz0ecBs$xUeAtUtI2FpUuIB$N$z=jIK@-c zN57A3*e&Bk_nQ`v>9ICApM^dxcxIFX_beJu_YVY4>vGcfU{b9Kq(|T>u$R^qKbWkG z!nCqQ1nxQ+*uDeG?={moZf@=Cg&hY!_;g96fm&9UxwWrmkMuJ%?$$gyA0a7Gf6^&g zKjok0-&O(lwXBe*bKs%>4w)B*dbxcD@Ej-~O}jgc&J(CU&QF6MDd1lTy|N*i z*@`%3fIr~noh_6{Tz_yrX?~FYf4`{encVV;#&-jF`f8DxJf93R0>}3Sla@cGd=l|< zK#tn?-LZuCdHbdY$v56sHJZz(L7w9K&#YHpP<(~{(3!p@O-MSJeJ#)c)WnIlr?6k5@u}j`nxS_%uEI-Ap=9 z;PzT!hXK3?U$~sSf2SZ%t-wp0uWI>yK|6j&M1%47(b27HKL4aZ&H=ns-Hb|ne$gG0 z`9<^Fg6iL{;PX=&|YHQN))=NEeKv}T|5^UB4;Mftvy+MmX!whJGI^YO_9Ir4AC zfMNN$e|o}Eb~$?{u>fmt2d>ln_G7&&a|*Kg%>lbp!1HXZ^0W}g5#Kc6$5)PgQ8*jV zdXB8EHR%{?#51gJO+gfqo?w)r? zn}LU#fYbLyOSV@JdR_AOc;G5i(D+@W!;=+Ctw81a#nD@?PaV+n$F_B)Ra!qR?8{!? z!Ow;ttbfeqHJD#%{1~qL^FKa*Q2TkIe^Qwt6S+Le(fIK!_IgZ+A-jJ4k1{^Aepp!b zyKywW@cu~a2NU=aQ);)R{jby}*LT6|2P^m^E?l`w`%mKg$0y*)D5u^1{C9dDQQ&Ft zD-HPf!@gQZ^MJrpfO~=W?XUYWR-5e~#fRdbelDaakH7u^{D*v<3DH$ZUW{+F9x#DN z>w$>7_t^1SWD8BIe`@mi z82*)nsr^HSz!g79e<+_j9gp18r2WoL!bTq+ss&z4T=0E1?X;He-t$FO z@qd3jk}%>TjvwKXeSM zLHE}sJNN#U0sh3yzsf`zh$%~d{D5nImi|XR+Wmbrcmg*7Hvr$!^!|_-hLitV@Xjx^ z@8td`LXPB1b-4P7#iAZ*t&Eo$yi}BLUyhtk_j`rCUR zL`}B6S??!{$9uP9i`{k~_@JME3iQc`=u>4J==~~rH(V-ExnuNbVS~U;!0G$`)vJCm zz%YJO)_d%%!0G$`X{#puRdQgQ3-X~3;MAX|?Ks?G_U&`qNPh~|KT*!}g*$I9dgSh{ zON6HZr~cgUi+VK@kNtIr^m~DSA};toQ--E>nyvbV`g2x)r}qIIJ6@pj_|i!~2(E}9 z^;de1Wo*T7j?(@@;MCrxUu2vvhiur+pA(^cr}t@Twho*UVinq@eh1_z-?c@5ni>W? zxA`Rn{OC0?%OlNxHCg`%e(?N~27Z)ten^xli|YT6u-^(?aY)+V>1^%o{5ccypZe?b znFB|MnWY{fPveCN^3Url_A41q{#)^V*m3XAJP?w|-~ViEl{Xs?rF^feke`vW|7*A6#M0~H zFP}eI`TjZZ-81UTM%MAWs z11r3ZOhlz9a?965@W-W2TNV}6zM_6QkIcaL)|T78_=>N`Gayg-cGPixf)e%md!9LDlG>cnQ7&JnEkr;18Yn;n%t4 zUk36^^Q(-{y~{^aHD>9b(5J_Ep+|o(fLHNR#k~1Ul1Kjvz6N}n56$48IsVVG{03sm zQp87t@!A1i+?;zq764D^Ghkh#!2FsD-jN=*m2^Lev&kW!VtbJ)<5e?NWOTiD`Pn*Fn(sbgnxInspzVTuo z=K!yM(yJ15KS}7L??J`kygwDZ{FC2(o7;UPFYXUyfR`sv<~e#ERK%Ok|83BBB;Sew zJfEq*>D@9OUr$S(#rvBH*J(WJbAIM!em+j~qZPbo^TR$kSvSub{}C%bd~nq$&0vOlxw*j~Bm*MoPXyP+u8Pv`%n-|@+* zYoy=TUfJjWkf-zimL;cNrZ`d>1n}wnA98!Te|YA9p8tdQ>G?x@RZu9}H|zW#_{NH< zRXFa&bsHsGogI)(}ar=tbRKGr}$jDJbWm{N7!eD zoC9Uq`FbBNo&S^mt(W3EaQ#{5|Ikx?*|CYV-{SF31FktCAb5O915Xpbz>=2|i?xRa`#&#uwQhbAPs5gfJiz%s#dCPr9X-WU)JOY$!$}z@ znkPFZv=|kf&qALTJTuDIEAp4m$Lz^E{|CO$eRw135%SdkX1J@lWKJClN+DL-wg0ABmd|{dBpj_`K0+> z`adta^}XEkiN<#Wc=f%Dr}BKF^M8s@@7ej!^Y}O*N9{YMRKK>oed+w4n;TKY%l|HT_`Tck3`hzNP|PY+(Fw2|`y&i`?p z&i_4so+=&zdC^~Tod1L0t@^PU|MUDGyi*-|mdW+}AO56**YW*Y|K>JcWu5^N)(j-{DvI{@LDIdY|Hz13i8wnyus^xz4`fg*7-mB z??1)H?c(!K3gl>h_+)zJ^L&2EI{!z19WpBN9G{=kAn!#Pb35e+KEGt0|DTb5zD?a- z+<*At^O3hdjdwdvJ1g<=$pks_?_S43UvU5QgrodU-@+Sk{*UW4zg2EkBr4$iA9kmJ zrwqH^Ea3bf@l69>am=eke*SO5de#2|M4wMR-hWf<)Vosjo&=Q%c|rZ}&gs*mlv>%q z!hhP|>;I7PnOSIcS$;lD{UZ%_Xsvr@ad}!_k$&54V^Q9}N!|hd)qCeJz~%KgclIJb z@(t^-l=?RxKWY9>gPyGoyMFvX&)< z1Ng!L`gR9zR(%CLYd)v*@Aq$gu%6aqyuT&Gj!A<<$MW-U$|sV4bEo5!+~hMLAJXU1 zS}w0RFa4wWHrY8LAI-C({#3|m!K+xS_U3@|a~emnKL2=roeh+aLZ14I8SZ4=&s2Dy>gNyeJ+H*s*f-^b!30*n#sC zYVVRaXBW=(d>G?n8uS#s^zHNic|J_zANZdl(uCH$jf%r?>ie4axI-wSq_a zT42B}Q*P&Pdg7s+HTqO)!1*t()A&4UXSZf~v+d2w$G&i~Zs)i0c(0We?K8|(sTyBT zrQmr!TJN9flGLBC_fw&t&R5$HjCw`+BK%7Ro`Ev0ecc91*zLo!-g`y&o31aa`KHj5 zp3Q_yK0HMGr}UTZA9w$FSKhI^?W+hk0H^y+gYvv>H=@lK{^3FBHv=Cm1bm;QGuNM$ zIURmd{NInilIO=%f6ApQb(R)ua0hrua!~z!=8V5(=sau$;i*COZ!fxk(WGAe2@lNx zK12xkJ~P7iE`C+$)I0HiU;Qe2FC@i3<1@vP^O{9mN?Re#Xt?lNaWf!V(Q z`tv`T;(+m?ecp-&RknQAd`x70h*BOGz}_rG6c-c!8e|J{9x_umZ2k^bIki=(-HslXK((*D-( z?)Hv=ex6@i;FMpNTkV;u4r+g4kFB|UUx@*H zYoE2&@%e?``(c25K2kT3E@555(=H}0dcMZgpK60!d>U>}hTo}=r)YjOHO zeS&WWpZ3qG;D0gjyJ|(XfqYTF0emlbKh!B!tQdGgp9cGII!D+3E&Xp}`QvDDO`tx( z4?Zt5fS=j2*J65~3Q39jy*Q__f_G@h{SzgjSLmbhItlmVlEI7G+V2g0zl-bBU_Y7) z-r;;5;^}){{@=3+`hJm+72i8b*)IL^LQZp2{w;9vJtZCc+h4$BEET1+nGbGd`r39|MCF4N*b5+OWvtbN30C#ne<5}~cU7h%T z%?zCS|H&i$2C1^;m7ZGCe*0Kiwt4q-E&qMNWXRL=LbHn6u7}vN?Mnqt`>m0!Msx^e zcm{A<-yAsOJD*^<;&z~a7px^GD;cf@PV-l6(bY3lz(pRUjgrq_CZZk#_zN0FPYJh3 zJLzA+H-Vpm(hPpb^f~1t5{M~F!PkTa=9vTh>QAB;s*QnpBlupk2QPF+Kl|=aGl5&z8JHqg=m+`09te zO6`$;P#(qZ>DVsRl8sY8q2C3yKMLC&nwX6nAy0W)xa`Ld_&jL=ZW}Gzr^Kn+?UYR3 z4xIK0XEqGFr(!tugEahZ$?2($CWJV%>vuz*)@i419S8|!xCc1R3zt51gpS2>!!Y17_0ic}i>LIy^Y9E#ObPb>r6vdthGp z^oIxMbrSe4b;=;MuRjKkpT6%4!wxri9(#0p9v@G9#JCoZ@s8TN@Auy&hgq}nxVwl4 zcvDv_>8E6PJaB5Sm%p^DsbYBg7&$IbzDzlBVo#{gFYyue+aOQ*a;c8-Q5eJ3u$$U* zX4qjhZx2^c{jOT`9<%lcr}$F+>EMT$UrZ705ge~1;F&19*K4_!{jQ%U&ebfUX)*&TN|H-Fn=ijC|)N+qq^|?vqPTz?Ow*)i2LgVPV(D_SDw%PrE!e> zb%TF(`qoXk`D+30LHS3u+4q^hs<`{oA8MZ(O$!?6cV$Js(|ttR7t{RsM0d>+k|Nug z{^fkjS{X;<7!cjdhpno3Mra=vZ7JP|9{cJp2@S{wnV}0-YU>AtXma9) zzOufPGq&Fg(Mmkdr>6{D7(4%gSD}~Jx!*~s*ELSc*V1lp7YZJE?~{5NjX$W2!r!LB z!}<>IJ9tpnUUc%~_bco9?hNSvedCFf&y>BU2r=Q874tH+)2xfS*VH}&*FTi;AiUC~ zUkiq%%1VVjR6muG5>k9MVt9|i1AB3EM15KISfRIBh&FWg6Zz`;|D~^6&%xH=y?Xv% z^`%1J2Gh|c7blLtEX)x0XD*O=LV5Le%Y@{R3~8jmHID-QJ2Rl*x0G)J*8?Z{VK=MJ z3uE%8AoGx-0JH%{p7{Oi#%Z7xiyFMJYlsRHMo4w~px zB<73@^;;^Fql;Fj{tMB7IA)?A&0`sd;_rSs84A6`=W#TE*P~^LkHf$dxE0r_|7f19 z`&Y?u2XK;~GXBU;6~j}4n<(C(Fo6J~K zbn$P7455bS5#h~Yl$^U=WpE2=q)dAdq zvcRU$yh_v~^U#d|0>ZHbt`Zm&b+1X^P7&#p&`P`oOqwzTv5iO9ILs$M0+pgDVt8hdywf$IT{v(NN6H&2sb3Bo-figc zzJvN?1<_|Tk7N8Z>E9_wWb6t>eZ&{>qIF3! zcom!V?HC50z$sp7z<+G>a*LATUR)=CopYkAs2HyKSH^?nd%PE$Kb+xu;3ThE?u?57 zF5*JptGaROq*{@d-OjXLvO@m;tb*ww3@5woz@L{W*EE#j&Y*e^PS<=D#&9=qk}v+v zuTPW=_XNqi?_E5h0`9Z&Wg!Ha%7XZNsBc~#*=^A9219+zsUCfY4P=SW^IrEt#%)`^ zbGv`sHrYRHh)yVVH-zC7k0juO_Kp}B%5WF1Q#-7gTBAT1 z!_$G2{H|&r7F9AlGe}@2RBzKeX2{t8Xaf(};q{AwE;aVZ&cDoAzz@ zb3YMA5eNGI(W7b2{!w^k9C&}RLyp$F#j4!A910$qLe!I$-^t*&{`AYcVc-co4c93y z=FJP5DjDttPV#>@=<Uk4$^1av}SRv;Df7r!^?=;q& z{ABP=DC1s9f5)`>?&o~woP13X-w6K0l$ihWn*#YFZ?*V+8S6T^KN+02!<|t7Dny|W zIPLqL(9?I9(Nye z*MZlm`Ip^PkmvoF<~`aUEx47a4xaafKV**u`ZiRlJ1G=#5qJ`=(|OxkM%PL2;rB}-(d z-6&hm%F{fG;k5oD|0@rdoI8;6JX@Ip4rWfBBwUl;fC)j|cS{ z!5eU}>$GTw>u{aU*Dtlg zf^)Y7@XwT8P_LjNa6S-x8~8Tx?cn!1FebW?J|{l``~*5T1b?Y+mG3>MIr%P}f5wCF z0sl?@KlMd4Ir%p5JvbMR3zc!{*Lcqju`c2tVSgshcU|Bc!Pj4y(yXYLv;F4`;ZE?~ zC~e@^T6C*Yv5cI29e8%=cY?3{xBTSdn3qUO*rOgQ+be<2wZZRJyoR$xDlug#`02P$ zMfsr)lm4Eot!_~=B`4nnKHV3L2Y*ZDx{CLbbMljd_!jVMFSxzyeMcZ)*SAXdFN3dX5-3?#WFs0U-9Ji+GnM9=vPYr z>HfkOrqj0r?*9R&@%i$tuU`k;{{v3-_qnC`U709r5cb=F(>iC+;|32@3|AA5a#V8T zL#1H9XfL`Coq+o{Zt%XySHoT!_hDphGT-R_P{Kob-`)d$?P|{rWo(Loj28A~;(k<| zO2(n=o>{+?_3^|<;6_}h@v+AByN+@Uw*V*qn~Z6CMaOVEa2g-q*x!x$h~ZA)6rU1p zcO5DZocmAr;oach?00x)1&g$k{uTV-`|uv{UtMifw_*Y@WhwX+FS<`27cS%A7`~uK zC1YT`1V8wGr4jrC(d|c8j?c-b`&Xpj2L7E{-}SAc%gGPE5AOuOla`na6@;QR3D z;IG(n&0JL-$QSq7={`Ik+4KsfB8BdwM@awaIg@z&&H29PO+rk#E+XlRON2XK-p^5g zBFlLEZhM&?4YS^>NzoU48~8~m9ncrM;qM&pixtlgSo6t#Om?KQ`o(iIUi|Hf3gi)A zMU}HsJU63JOMk^>QI9+5IU*YOB<_2^c#70d?~h-*=7%)e1&jCw%L_RX-vrcSLrL*X z!rx@4;EVXC1lgsl6zG>`z3ktD@9U?b&Z!b#^lg z>-`0y-&i3}adY7B2I(L6RSG5S<9{9`$X@}A_VFSvDUi=VDR5uhLNnRlV*JwFmT@sA zNW0oENj)EK7Hm1bDe!%c6s64D-9^uaD$Raa#5L=CD;~%f|7G+r_MDSStCDgwKIZ#$ zNQW>(w!A%3#+}AD!^20hN`_kqM;Q{@xJPTZ1^%1WrjKGYIr+i%c)(AX()~Q$Ga)IFPsX4;i;L#t zfiHjV2IfzLCdWSK`C|c};@_tI{9h>kzWh;o-k0(rs5JDW{%f=A_nm)0p7viY5~mjo zF-wNXKR0mNA1RllbP8p-2RP;5!54p34r91FM*2hZZ{cU3t>F2s15Wez+18`JQ89TV zaLV7!+gq*X{@YQ%1-zoA%mwl=`Q&@jf9hXzE>3sy`kj!Y{O|u>J#1`fnxm z*%Zd)&0bl*1-yE%I(@5TIMq+_P4l|ug=iK2kEq`XIcmTEQmVHKHDu#%;M9Jh)y7N< z7+-*UP(J-)n^%=6Xk zUE_QU!r1t&Lwv~o*wGy~@ceQ@p4xZgv-#6_e%T@K25;@{)su5;Uy82>ypV4az6j5y zeS^nSbv_xFe$E1U$#34icIb--ubIJ_pYnkFPx<@j_?N%&{G|M+{&jfIpqe4DOUOH+ zm-^Q_`@gPGhP#1NeCG~WHh@3RNBz$OUaunuJ^Xn-lBeQ^k0XvNlcY` z^t_+w55e=N5xftso*PW#U_iWJhXuTUdT%;QaTWe*@x7KLJU2T=`CwlN6bRe}IW_Y3 z@x!r6e7sBoo{nJu-2f{7qQW`Wo+#7T6b8K>B@A`L8O{EDaF#$KyKX>x5Z% zmPRq$h;X#M2`|N5=_edv7{B$b;z>EPcl?cG$Eh$zLnI(WS!ApbfD z^SHW@^gkY@z{R@S#Qyfx8{a!Mzi_89fPLTg}Uqa%c%0x}z zx^mEhS&sxJKB6Bhil7~P%JoU(2g`iVHOY^E90H!uOX7F;-~5ixYpyBsenC9scNpxi zxx4}LW|U>~G^#>A3jHZ~o?X2{>Tggj)6MlKLyp>Q%&;#8viH#`)rAB7`}1PQ}_ccr0joV1Np7phDbDk^ao#j~ z;eO_yGPOfsd;XU>X#~vk=W7!3ECupUk8G;IiUrkJ!#^PA-LYd*a-Ti<09Pt6kOL7mvLBsZ}@7S zA12^>;Mc#uq4mE^!PiJUe@wugU1DcMq5%bN?kD3){dq-)HFszn7Pxkh#2t`N8#yI| z#$SK?{4Vhn;9-|87U$zZe9-S^c3rG_!1KpTc3~e-He}a4UVj>JO$q7$d)*DKXuRP5 z>47hMP~@Qs5Q7m5_7$>yv$$0dwd%GJw6DHc*1l$0;b*UGF=sx~ zMdwQb*8ooh9=S8DCq29Cb1RhFEY=a;p!r^y>R(4-U62etsVLJ>(ikN8VjbbZb@8`Y zM`$X`cDHnlO zp7GAxg=U5t1S)YC^wIvPSfkk|!wi1dFP~0!V4N$r`{y@G;9^~#1l$uRh*n+Z5E!PVj|VU;LEnDzcqDBV<{<>wCxvnp^ZQ=8+z(e9nN&o3S(7~ejORQ_Y;5)+Ofzy4UYX6zfkI3j&3V3J&@Rs6& z?^7#bf4e)!lz)i-i~OeV(^7u_ld>u{)F4oaCqbU#TXK8cu`q)l_RG6~lf16U=E0QT zLVr4NivNSh2UhU*)8T$Meeb<}|Gu3Gw*#-Q|2xu3!rRU%vj{$Ds^Qg?t9eUHhli<^4oaPTEg-y#3z( zXx>k>z$uR}EVuqd`6=wz#>n}D&RzG`>60gf^#e2HsXe-ESz+Y;EHSA5nlU$8@qU&x zOtwohcq_X9JeT*g)S&u9G9AD0`ZI#+*L?Hmm%RQ|;0m3LLy1{mmuLMn>%NEqJS})1 z9v&M{s+3%q8|q5tI#Lbmx+|OAIUgr+sJ){9)EK^Vtr}E zbs;bMfhVXRIB_m0aB)s&iInY3Ydy-hC6?EQ5cnnhp>sMKhn%SAyt~jt+Q$f;;*+cY z;1_NE}ZY0+o0Q@N~#O>h|KpFoPfV%V*-c zzJ$~>;m!4?d|c4teI_(6JZe7H!~11?1sMmLKQp@)zsUP#0&ueL>c8WT@qR_?8yk2u zek2YaS0NnZhqPAqD|+5EDTu%QC)=!uT=-_3E5?EEM!B@I=7Jh=;QC#N2ffE86a4Sn ze!oM!Z#;y^zS5UhIo89viZUMe^e?YPYIE{~pT9}~-*KXR<=ozz65Ma?;Loc)r)F;N zO`-KJy*I@LzA#(lOOjLeFN*V{!lrs5c+O4W=|TASc};UUuB(K8|BcjhC}r}RP>awm z^{em7@qpG#hGp6zp=LkquiprH3(8X!tHy>gd3%ulQxCUaQ8JwLQ$B89SGo$9E_t|H^m<^KKMk;oGTK7t?IzjWa1o4@KGWhAC71wXidC4hfs z+zBYY&pIu*j;>mxo#NLNfIH ze!BPeC+p|l5F{}!rQtfAf6+PH)Nf{~=$x1oih0?FeKOhUW%h}@kN-xlW9YnZ`FlT{ zrFqt$H$n9os>(PN|K>*r#e(V+aSX0cV8RY97m{%&`C7WF8ZPgGd|FZI zcjs5VZ*c!IaQ}tw!<2qJ_73?X^ru5U6Xk;ghxXB$MBqtyPLuNJha(3!a{2h`(tpz5 zve*9E{2VO~cmm3As@C2{YahRU)N2Diw|qVgi+@)8(S4?e?=?yf@So~O{AT~M^8!0} zReB2qw%_qHsmBq1fBU3EJ`?5ca_vU&_*45?aX!1_c7t-#O=$39NlNw z^2wW@#kr*T`0WF3g?}N>de-Ol$JIptM_Hu(nk(EtijN8Y|I+7FXI{Szax^|Kep%FA0`33+S{*8r#zI=mhp~5QL@O&fl z#5WIN9??P0h*IEU-ZHblMcgxI%W>VkQI>`7kNlYBz0%n{uwNFfJe+=-)Ss6Q=u1JF z_q!!^__&mY>yF>#zRq>K*cqi>IwI<)`+HvSY;B&K>AYXy+KaOOIH&BFhnAJu6~W~7 zpUC*w=SusHO=G^La}6P{0d7KB&3Pe1?4QI(tWPXXDM!zNTfw_r^xU6f-^4$HZv>y7 zt8{?hv+*BGbNjs}U6B4%@W-_=G^6p0>JaOQ%%F9I7kt4H{?Ph|{CU`QWCP|;c(6Z) z+A=tCf6U-tY_VrfF8+iE`{MvV<=ayGgZ&YC8tjks!?(VITq;U0N`Z?! zRo9Vri@!zOgU?w^wdFb^reNko8b<_Id;~vuJsl5y8*5IRA=ZJE>LC?}kqoZ=MGsk&Y2Kb})75P55^=h!4!hW&tPlBB0 zQyDjsHQ;aVuUPjd;JWlbH0wP!#^o{&U2hMp7s~osGM<;C@6Wf{kXa$bA*5wq((e|y zpts*Q{Zye0*ZwK{FUh~W-n<5v&xD*6>*T!uocx)~$JLd7(et?5YUUpu#`MPnr~P!L zyE_^v8J+-~&Kv&Twn438cslC0fwy2omCfM{C;R9;;bNENW^SJga&#WBE^X2sZeKcZ z+E0IdX2mXUUnX$Mt3E>t%;EMWk^awQ9Qt)RVvb<;(f5VofzP_qs{*|b-al?6%JG-t ztDkgiRam0G`TXOG4RYk)*XyPfS2CQQGfD#QLM8nw6~n3h)q~}DT5ffG;%r*G>5TSUlRj(b?-No-a=DDIb={Y}`Wm;FDKcY6s4zjxxn& zlGQ@Lhw4LroiJj{GCm)u8%XJ>Fl8z^OlnulHQ${lx;D z`rCkN%iHq)YzI!`;je11hWBSDa2l@;-Wl`(?{9A4G+r!kUgdKhKM!!~&kL&Wp3VE4 z8}U(pA>)wnuf2biLq<@V_TW_0bkcUAy4h|U-RCkfcXUXNt5uNirx3MHA0iK?e_%9|4=yLVi?2K4W-`{ zf91yYVM>P6c&h`?uwv$d}^_I<8MX~FeV z{Z8=a)jz8a&!v7no~wFsc50gd{~<^DxmxwQ47X3+NcvCt)BC$iUvvB1kk^6t_UqM= z5v+bAa3k=-@AaOhW;m_q=>1Z2A}34;Nm2MeBEKkpcF6y7+!+tR7cr`JM=~p)n?Em}keqBzEA1-J+0Ck@8b zkAQt*zN7CyTHuG;DC03D`EpDiw4-b-|9&Stc)rkqzozGhy{TUlU$n0q{VxH$Q}35t zo7?yjhjl}pX(PMv@zDvn1dK0d4{VF)<69i9R|m;?pib;h3O+u2AW!kHR;cR?K0d3P zNPlU3Ty5%nk=IY_VI6oAVxr>%#$V_+0{1*_W#!`^jc>GGeg0n4^?ZJ@Lyq$6-Iy~= z0_;b-ko~i(emRKeha2*gA8%@C+w%PI0H^%;rPzkOx#frYOBshFfA2n$TYeZ}hYq~i z>(Y)ctL-tAM|}QqAwS0aGo~Y-AKj3P zM}8P@w0+InCq8IDRPn2EO#<4#X<+;RQoQf1T-zVKq4A#vw7&=S8-X{RSh66`Pip@J z*dLqXb@TSMLypGhwSAxG53mpYmfF9hH9^7K*A01U-)`62Zq2QIJ>cn1{_=Nj?W?2y z-%Q5iqY{I@%dLHBJxc!Q!0#Kg!j)_LqTU4Xn(c1;8E;>T5A9d3+`QMB_YWuJXngE4 z#@dd@&+Cx$E{*S-dnw^ZA+NX?(di=jeSdZ-Ja0Wyj5JchmeT`V;LJC_YZ`y7c(u3FVoz zMy{vb@YfBV%lJzLY8PQIeZSU){Y3RObKCNG$F-30u%X|~Yxvnv-rq8zHy*sq*jUhFg$NF7R62Q9X-gxD)*` z9k{hbwF-F|o{8(!Us4o1KGiVXLgVFEG7e!Imha5Ra688Pc;LOOecU%c!xM0w#^Yz6 zL5~YC+>ZIs2HxF9wVM}YxDI#{@QLfr?J5ME=R?;17rY&3M$IprNSPo@!KeP3wf_ab z*sm4bMXWjbG=698e@!wDl?!fe7H7`M4_*(%gTLJ|zh6;PPCn&x*8Ug#RjK7_7Bl4J zll@uyU+~ZOxw@&iJ|~~-&)WZj-=WKaUrK0m@`LTq1i#_p!n5f2*hosmGsph7rHoId z#dG!IciBRS>?_5&bnyOHz+zu)$G$58@^+L07w6K+>~GO;>HbNoU9NL_OwO}_>hj@A zebD`r_?K;q2wmdiAE%(ti?VFNgFE;>OVdjFVf~axf21G2=fF{q0rFOq0vCC1XMc-02KO&( z7a7+lhdOQ)_ZleYNq>4!y)LHD7ssske*I=`w@b)$TXV{FMA@;bl=nT~)K>aM-}kuD z<9y+*Rli(KxDGgd-{axZ=Z}7^oT&vKY6MRAYfA1ezWld^8%F_GdJ<%RO~-pEFCX9N zd+JMmL_6CdPyMEkdd~0=Z5AF%^^^W%{k^51zU=!}FnsbMZphR3VMe5`G(7wBMq9!? z!0G!i-y|)1dw#+)#w~B>pePQ#)|_9ZCA$!gscmHlbR<%KnIWIpL2J za&hKY7x*}nj_b7k7_WY|RjHLaguFSg%qLpU&3tc6`4Dq9u6`lgi`JWKErZ8}TC?%^ z_A*|ifADzwnlOed@SJD@cpc83|5nLx8?Kw5$$EMge=<-7T*QN(izoY%z_0SA{OEAl zDXo#?L>zDz%36a)c8&l~_)GS9fL|YYsh67L&!ru-UP&0R`Mpr!x!IEpy9fSwdU+Ul z3VcL;x&#>?Bg*TiPkgKdkK1Dd-f%&rTg7mar})i3di3{Qfb3+3?5oBpD>2>ohY zPe(aq$DBraATRt;uaN%gP-cQRd+!AW3+*M;a?`@H+VG$WFCwKPvD75Wqwn8 z=Ku8O?hu329{&?U?C@t+bc2=T(-X0WR7kE`%1&+{qM1has2d@Xy!SA>KZr5-v zF=Z*@laBbPJ4*jm74|I63!cDJlBEB%e<)OONP`fxtH2W=NB%9mnRYxBxUffo-_51x zdu`zFsPpP`8pp^gp)VeI63Ud52k&ZNkI-kqc<8|I@VdeKk-cZm~mam3%}_5Q@Ru>x3zNL z_%H$bK0aKTiQo4nJ;e`~+aXaYpA3DeD0lvsxL*l^(4Ssbwv%@Qi$CY;`B&OS@%!$!vj?}|79;&PBEB1DA0N)`S9Fp7Q~XwcQ`pGu z*Bz4jN&e94R&BVv7V-v^W!JhcaQ_H5121OQ@8JGrz^_E$pH+z$ujBQ9MEfO^e(>^E z+Na^q=~8@B!MoJ`!U+Bxs5U6R#=56FbNflZqN|L25qrm~sL3=*Ja}vnUXQuO;d448Cp2m?pk!8n(p+AfGP=2L?*Q4`= z(@KVC;5y}Z&&w0~tALAffYuq5KMJ#qL+5^nuTndrIsE-Kk@SK0m3G-e-d^;66%+7U zeGA%ii>DR%^0y;QJf3FgPei<8hi|IH^`}5ii?aW$GiAAcsy_|5W_{~vTtDTD7kG~{ z`})xHm?ECkpHkkF{pS1SW7pEyBXGkU+1`XF9id+zlH(EeH&Ztm#{w(H_h;>?bT^jr zq_dCu-e?|QE94v~5A}Xw;rT@Uk@R=!+iWG%?|aXutTzp1@!qMuc)k;O!R&xwug>4%T0)Kj-$5 zeh1_icDgYnH~lHV&t#OW#`RNwr1n|0Vni~MLep!Lisxy9>raKBAJnO_n73aVSdicKE+f6%+gV zukrJL$~tFqK%UN-9zH5%ukO0g2KgV70-Vm7>K~Zh>)FwAU4e(D0l$i*`M&cMO^>vw z9|w=b{ne*dqHq+iol`cL(5srhf=Ir_W)SA_cP577gs`ukVj-8-||nx9F( z3HUYCzb__9f9pl)5a3zQxlsH<$`nZE@pC{vYhQWAHlFsgBEM3AQ~NC3-T3`*z0fY# zA0$uf`LhR2;XHr5kf-)3f8l7OaIIflA@q~{|6%O91DmS8f08C`Xc=Lb9YCNmgRBA~ zVHXe#OA88w9d_6i1;dhpAQ2G?GRm~<$Sf*QnPrDvL7+0EAVSzJ^OuwRIqB_7zTe;X z{n6XJ&*z+b&bjA~ci+nk?|WUWHDrX&l8u`NiTJSoTeZKB4wdkx4M=anCo!4hr2v0lQte|ezihnWS}BLCdG2duP zL+vBG8&;}cUPTAt7T`QTq<^)&b3eU<l-;-XJ|*WLKbOM(M`sjUox^{~vHm4_x_ENr z4{$fiBEQtL%lXIS8;_rh`<}CC(Qhd~3?qbpJih5nd#lRxFOP2~@ZO(ns+?o~#rVPc zXFAptl=WL6XGf`uOMe-L`sMM<1N)ueomdfbn)6(=h8VwMs*8LzfbRnT`X3ifxzVl? z-@ETD=2wnyI{5vExb1wM#(ZCYLB1G9invTZ`*TD2dd-7zkjJC?i(hG^^`<}HZy?_{ zw`*Rp*s|ZPR0rwje6vD-zvKi<7z`jh5$8GInpd(%$m`J*;4J^$_{!Q`Qa-y77q;)h zp#}c;T9f{C$g4)7Ur+tr7%s`1@jC=oTn~Kwb;=I*kLCjhdL;$tIp5M2?(W3j2l4p_oa49Kal1x-VH_>uQ({YnQn@5~m!kbo-Cw1X`-2&BR+PQ(STD%WYw&!)^>?Y1 zH%jhriIC&=n=`i8a#_EFag>#u_q+4+5kCKMp2v&onzL8={u|*c;Hojgzw&?2?!xmp zwXc)&AL|1ncpoeo*CW{cZ2;d4Ue?n4u|B_EQ}|=Y#2O8TjyypGJ$Xl^6@3`-;(VyJNA7w1Gs;`ob@lv_bgJX5BUDG%y)y&_unkw-x}9cmrs#z_tz*t?C77bkslE|!qz|C@@5#>O!AqDVm{^k7;hbN zK+X?~BL2e@UQUzOF9zT&e{65kW_dodd@kZ;N4e+dq%Y<53C}kyU$W!=B)NVktJpl@;9!X7;ik_zaIH?qCB1$#|wK?J`%jQ6L)^a?M&l| z0dgjkX7HaD{U$3|`+CqmR`8y*tC?0%YF{VLTQTq6*q5huAsNT`$o;S6`qiJv{m%_~ zZvWGlU#`fp9suq^xol>7MgF~*Xq8rEjC}#euIQ zE!cN7fv;+MsRlg{DjyVg1I7;s~TIc)6(MGs=)M;#u%7&uHH&Yef`u*c*W8l{doqzE|mlFF4Cx4^A z6!G|9$AL)jc^rtv=l^dUhzCzO4kY9Je;NnUfO8)Fr*WVO{405?srB)a4LN0A+i?Cr<#jyp|1~c&(f&!0yRq-!PeuMqUb>N&so;9x36RmloXT>D_I8DY^eyAZI~depBZC=X_n^)vrxZ+<%B|Utot^ zzZ3E)xIg&r7av!Yum9}8T_~RyKieor-sAp*3--;JdAX8op9gX#*k>MkID*&Rc|?xU3${V-Lo-wrtg>c1J~DkJx6&R4#_dh)Yn zdF1PNzQ16>eY6hk|J;cb_RU{>e}VB|$48BnaX0GspnP!j>=Swajqfk8{D4pYcp%Fg z9Pl4yuC~ARlH+5+c@ONUh)?LAPLXo_oseh$%GcObOl!>6&+@!K z-K4LHeF+zolwAHVCfj%&>4UmrU?J49lyU*-oNMga{G5_uK8T9-vl`e%Dbn|AIq`7 z&p6&w`pNf4?#ui8{5%{#ztH8;XI5To(D>wnJnxTp`Jqax#wxWxa2`K4I#l^|63+Wq z9`O2Bapd@&XWpOZ`X4uLzDlm&G*!ff>wkPIGgPkM0NjG|ZR49O!%)9>UiI(KJ5j$K zy!Q4Rk$j&*c$4$`#Kn0Her;=kr}@mx6eZ2u2Jq}CQ@}s`s6uJp7hx&ldw4wQCH(S$ zUnuvpk@=0x6eY#q4Zd-j;MYFUu3-W22)E!o=jUI8E4Sr+0>Zg}asNKm`sf~cf0X-| z6MCX1L>3N{^qb%p%eP;4Xncr-yA}06-Z8trJbt){K;*|JI58XZ_!LlFG>X zO# z8dq9A{dcI<<(tAOzWhB>9$(I?@c5Ut@@Zv$u9^I|K#s?s z`hB#IS^_{-yq3Ah{O99mjl%hk@e_Uf1c{KFYD) zM1SUd{Pb*%&!qK~Ki~P~vZvQ)OnUhHrbbkUoNtNH|1z!ZIvorkJRRpb-yV(VxiD19 zSJg~mKg%C^W85U~cX?nx+t<)Ff1|u!F+$#q^4FTbACmXyIbT@5>L0hO$@%Dj9Op~Q z^L?vj`*}Yk5xl{(dTr+Y5E{Qz;GY$E3d&tKpLF2ser^xqb9=MD>EIt~(R4LGC&YY; zp9A_0--tLhU)gDjyxuqCJm+hnR~IAlA|FZK3Y_Er?gu|^%qQVIAF%wops z$}8(v0XL)kv|qhr^8EoT&hvQFvE_uS^8UXAb~(VC^FicCJWo@5xiMb5;AbLu)mp6E zn%~GRB}$5i3;Y!DDutWo$oI!RIB!O~KONETuyp@d$NTR*KfYM@$9Q@CHqAynP*2sQ z^7(lGjp{c5x1iKcc#_5Y|8o90v5v5V*Xx*idL;TKdqsTSf4B5Pz2JM&Cx7SL^k%ZR z^!bnLx)kuI7?e&_hu`9F{v!VTYwdJ;+s{8+JHo>eb- z)(u>10c@cic@*`J{h;w1seYYdj_{xR z>(-c!cXenNim&s9xPQvy)%`!48|Cqe-!E%{o}a4J%+2E!$=h+B`@^Ou`P$0!w_%Ei zJFmaL*gezEzL2~N@*X^&{$a-O4)S>F2F~^w!{6MI?ehTV_9=fSZ*SQ?UcVTeA`Wlw z)=8E3ubq=~+7~{fq(ipP0y(yCMAg;>W%~>Y`4X*`Rg>kN3i+y!It`TNUBKDDlwnf~ z$o{#3vwtDRfsJJU?5rPUdZBAQWdCAH;C}jd!vF0rzEsQmHzu4nK>pCbtDT9@5Xt~ zuc_xU$LE25?|9 zf5%_CyS4NO>$XuHUR$%Vt(V_-He=6DgUEFB{*Jc(|i#xe$Rk?t9EhJoVrk@$TIB~Pb ztBY!*V0iWW$C+gCCOydtlh+X}&-2KgM!m|&-%mDR9La?I*^&{%g3U9L3BvxO6{6qr zJo8`UFuI>_twxqo91Iu-W1(kqFGGVv+kYDhTd?^6?kK0>OD_>7JA;;rE={Bdv%Kq4ayHLKFTBwP^EFwnZfeG!I zhSCjQtHsSO^K)MuU*a3UBzmfMkJ$X^5a z7Vuh@Xg8hiQ!>u)x8eEv(Zmy9%Ih@;(z9~88Ggx zf7Pi4KbPmrAK$W)XCe^9?wiGyIC*OB2Fbgi zpYNNFeXRaT+6VIAH+zV2@7js7&oh^&rlFnu*Ikc+_lO*I{JV$WHYJ?=jae-Gp~+fcfMuZ{~QzWP6s>b>sEg~ zmfIr@_5QEpKr;B;ewq0EpT>a%;M{&uOGSMC(>M?Zek^#(aUdS&|5HCt0{*}DQ$5-{ z6>_~2*WWDmU;3#F{VD_e*C$%07pGuK2lb;2^fTi!;qU3Dj&b}Pq_3aiysL`%e(laf z^}pc$PIwaJ?ciM+T=OtLALNrqKXn3c5;mf-{9KTGqNvveyh8uEuZ*yfQ$)iTby}0RKKgAkh1_k zr|P%Nw|Mg6^d1rA_iITteec!;IXmQ>C<&+cgC$9ysUCwvtfzTiZ~ez7*VRU13p>)l z=Xo@9^~i%7qYtL>D&Y5BGQnRuDeupGzeljeb+Gb%DUr*CpG8%rU($L+&17#${upZt z`}lke_(YR`--XwaY-jZ?Y17r1-)P)X{tit7^o%_|vYQ4xuA2BtJ5#{F9erRMUzaeS z+Cyn4Vf0>?ILLWWvaE51@SFW2KE2l^8t3UV`EOJDe_dRs5l;S_^5={X`(Jlv+s(oJ z=iiG;Kt0vUSMfiWLOSUnf0Xsod7nR!OF_y0c<@>2kA9`_ljJGiqLvAJ?RdT@H1*F% zY6qbLj{%?eedbL_vuPYY*e7oT&g;}wAFb>iBH{7CIiHKY{q4F|!jph=oHFJV-J_Fm zes66mcsoAXUMCbd<$ID{j7LWNUPcCZr|YGR53{Rs9K`4MU8Ua>e(P6>c*K`1Wzk!6 z(7o{u2}>O=^z-|)qQRfq^WIQ?{(_~5pD|4E`FGuI;LrShP9pD@$$X_fDQ|^c+I{BL zx*+!0MhgA*+k%%0{a?E&7!3C&A21-lj9h@DRfe}&!r9L(~3{ddUqB}1O`t&Cy% zBd(9+*`74;8b58YOe@(NnJVna1YW0IrxCii?0A^Ri1=|l+#?SCsFv{PH6k8d&%8qx zn?}N8fph(b2F@v?mGC&=+#mKlT9+!&IYK4*WZ>K$bIZNgD@?*8xqg&W zn%=ynm+<7{VxO1e*Z)FvevKvD|4hh5{v`aInD$A&T#%>sbdD17iAVgR!MhrEe^t0m z=;6P_PdbcvBM)Q2-%!lbB_fuYq9lIiLBUS|KOX!py4xLd`**0a`P@JJ??VHBYfGlvSlBa=j2o|Byi+ zIA6LjU)bIk?Ggt*Y4+x`#vLc><+WC+I?e~{`#<@Wal}Au z!KZY>dwg5}@V|XbD)>k% zk~e%I^j8w%sxpRY-8L*)_6dFT;yT0eoc+0EukTC9{V4#^;PK`>Uy^?*zrZUJnp%=K4|Qx!7P=sANCiuT^anaVQqQ;Nvg}=l5+V<2|8+wte-}R#WO*y_M3le%IAgI~zZvIKP=0;U;$KgY z|LHi-@h`M_T~#?g$+N_GtJ);|H z>%IiM7nR?mY6ZVyoy$eT&8i#+>5o#pN7V`bSBCZ5`Fox$M119YR8zqJW6!^R`97G; zPeFcX>=kkFfWId9y^8ccY`#t)8Pczu*NmG*+)gzZ^J88wN6pH;CG~f=;yTCzKGCRs zc>j~*YZ{O^lJn17U%-266Cq!2$jAo#Ts2ood}Vx7!0*34xlk@MGet>!Wqdv0e|yQ* zlAqIIDdH>RYjg?!Up0Pvh3`|!d}Vws;J;~dI*Y!au842I^{a#RC&yIJ<5eujm#+7e z@uj*c?hg3jf_yqk!fBk%lsz}RBjKFrGxmq-s0<>sGmg~<}`Xf zE=arhua7wIW5K`h=+&_x?c%>aipdc3dOY~$ie=mh(k=n^*j|cx%3jr0TZeV6uwK~D z>pwks8PNaWn~je{&CC=f`ODWYabrY3iMcE6YV!P_G1?&dd3_wSMZ_fm{CV}u-w9?9 zua6_ak3%_Wv+n({AolS3I2m>)f!}o0_N`TgQ);7{pu_m5!Xf^xm9-zxlY zW&S!bPvH6>U|fg>|H4mI67mLF?;76|?ZfL`8~7A)-@XiRIp2N1y9*v)pK&@85$|Gq!-so&WZ zcALQ`4vlx7kyt;W-rFa>xy$tu?gZbA_wlAAE#IW|juR~J0vmL)#5bBdy!qjre65KjAh(FH{NaNF|wtn|oyE7WLDiWl#1 za=mfTb97YX*BVkL9pt~VUV_R0SjZ)!0*b;-NyE_&Qaysa6ZMnY4@c zOoBY`6Ri8p@?2vkRN(x4L@IcD2fw>K#O#B;_IvNU;ykzKspx-?Y9u@ZxPG_rt6Jx% zrdr_MSY&C1D(_4q4(=-hhYi6QpB?HH7x~$GdFy@hzO)Ot1HZp=#QewW5R1@2e!7A4d>c2Rz*b(L6K=!r+IYa5 zv`2G+*W=XB43Q%5_;+axdqg~*J!^0;$aR6gUs`($ITQG&XGIQBuG^{pDAa2Ouf>2u z!}R8C`wh=T9glqk{SGM7>td?nh4Wn%^nYLwVgt@r*~_y1<+0 zdC`Nff4sQ=eY=C}waiaBcQe4RE4;t9F5mn?YN@~QdCr&q`#nQtJRSYn_`8Tx zbiHK{<$N^bJolHbrGLxfe3a)c)8Arzwt}C#PR)s&mm(Ts98&>zpj^_d{&G1#W2Oo{ z>G0bHUb7d=b1Cza;+F`X8@#J?f6Cyz^u>3d@QeL#*sI%@+#l86agWD2E_qFE>%~@! zJo0jVhZ*|*y*jT|$Ch8Lq?7+uPj4Ydf4%moSx-FlX!f6df8uOkIufqq`0zY1a`DIo zQhWIGaW>S3*(Ub#v>RIh`u+Ds+28o&?sL^vK_>m&-iG}mE+1sv?x>M)6V4kE&-lXM zKM2Xj{o_A>e`<8?~KKpS;cq zc^As#uSS*CNI35^v%J33{Hd~kZpe91e!G0{>kvtv{b&8#|9<+8tlxA%#D(QA|1s%~ zEN{m8jem!CQZCmx7=GQyP5|Vii38Oa9q`yHKu*(fzD<2nOl% zpdVS#-s#}g>^^X7F0?!ABR;RQ`F@h>knnd^`nUVSt<22U?}C0eN)!0^M<4r<-Ainbcfff8q^P{TJ zAjRVX)j-!@%5^uLr}cOY=2Iu+Q&194*I#MUXX3jR>-YG@VqPXb?boP6L|*b<7w4zh z{pUlqfmpu%K>vPC0-gtmN)_>W_bS&jqk*CgP) zkPitnP7?i=_o?FXyhPphr(UUjyCZ%xRNlCUnH_?kfPJwv=xbE_nq8yd`^F9Y9#h&E zA}&4Jd~;oG7CH%!J|g_)IQ{x2>2D2is?Tyx$gzE~;J?|w<0rmO6xzhN&f~Vbr&#xw zozf^nV-*alFG*3K>1<;E5a3jwadOUhq=J9!SokC5I)nJJU*@zg1AM*a_Bfqc)XRT~ z@86$4D*Sep75TGtcB^vAbqDcze?AU+V<6Wf@$;QwCe|!UpZ$vVj01nb&=j&ll8u+{RA25aow10@ogZ{$%^ZH}LZ?f3i9$M2UB7U*BPVX6d zUZ;W{YA*wix5%TpKQAoE?dkQ`KhJSK#zBAFq@*n&mYne+eX+n3Q2tV?z!Yt);1QmR z^L+gryEUwsPQo*Q>+!wpS+i0Hgl6Mv&IkV9SMqLq!#>vfRpGBX>bUTqzxQP+@JsBg z*>U{6Ds>ES{@&N{b64x_nzrc!$ZKrCyZ%u#o%(j`h3YYtN7TQ?`s0D~b;zaf_8i^! z^lyINU7ZA+uS3?P7i_!s?!^VHKNa{0I^jLq?7o@M(6fCp{ZH}XeI<_1d6zz1Ve*iK%%6N48-{pN`zrfOEO>YJl)tQx5%uz4;w$@09Qe<7 zEo+%8nwg>`zHRXVswe`)&89EKH2sL?69z2ulIq z^R3u_;Px9cJmG}~^Ad>s79w zzXw{l+>ts#>i7SSEZ1*^z7tiKzoV?5;;O7)_^nl$A?HLHJ5$)1g3oL(@hPrpI8UD` zuKZk4LptF-=6~OQeA0AVOZuPs3qM!H`#Sk@{n1lnCRE`3ToL!DawiTpmFLG;w}=z3 z^V_(JU(lFITF6HOk3)H*z)4q#*$4aT_Y6S$VEi21bl0!4{$$AUbxzYOy$fq3`841> zKj#~?siCYt0eB|LrDy)xAnzOSb3u`(g&$e-_dVr#k>V4L^L$_6#GkkG^E^m-$ zfAQcSFPhpdEYQDzb#*fMe}zO{qv1;SkNTC;KeB-Qj)q(Y%E+_Xe$%?zBz>lSl!X15 zvzf2MsE&x*X?5K@Z+8^>yx(^LpXW7u=9VHoIxhE(xL$d+131rXPg=ZuzInv^=OM32 z1YVR*c#p*Guj&>I|G72&PkG3Bn%GyY$1)CI`!@vR9^vVbXZ%Q5k7&NXMR}3JINl4R zIw$-+{Z*URd@VqA(LwP^SLB5ee8Q>Sl=_^xguZ5J{}?K2tly3#~`;-2>uzTmd z#2AX_|JR?Qz|Ym=uOy|Pfp zBufX$r$Qf(xAp!yb61UiNO%Tt9xt!TraaHg$45V$>nQu zU0em_g;9|gc13-h7hGSR^BY%ieO`OCMnlfLYC5>dgKYiY{ttcJ?sL`+IiofT2Kl2( z%h~RA_mnEgc_+6!*KY(r>(iJ6JkH4VrJz1DczZTlw@Bkn!1~7y-h}%7b1TOiYDZ;! zs4i;9MAYMiJjXT#pOx*HhVvv(ese#u)fel=<-2u%O8Fj^8ZFN2fk*x!;#9BU%Ab|_ zPVF8Cegev9@ONJsdz+sZpt|Ys@v(ox>p;HWWSqV6OOC%_3w|WVXB+e;pv+UsdWiaq ze2{)#zsJCyRPd)JR67#poe<^tP#&6*hn|5VpEAKGy_5&a`cpm@`wix|-+mgT{!nH8 zF_%RAqB>ukNcGDH)o;i6#yJoNKJh3IlJHr!J4O|zio*HC?xMXI=aTb+%T!4(+u-fz zVd>I&ik}|qPVP63`C@$&`(EWOAx4%ICGq(=CSxvPNAzXk@4I(@&~g5=6!DeoF&p?J z%TM@?V!-y348_N(7$*|ICtUtMDUXFbj_)rxAVQ7&pmtQ+nE^d5=bb9Y;|l4dgZN52 z4Sx#1Vy5gE%P|#f(N0P`g&wUc74?`Q&$4!Wmi?u1Hy-Cn-rHX_s#zj0^P{pJ!&bb} z&p-UJ&>s?(3V!M%!Q<<|sNvH#2JtH({uz+}rq!`WWSeXc#owiff8-Sr2h{Js4&?gz zI`HFk!=xbf2gKC|eXDzK>ZYup@?TlMs8_3sfm{Mgz79;qXW0*mYdX$z+<3p6pTA3w z7x6pyaLO=QmifHj&3xlk5r^Xk7mZc!|5Dskb%j3GWdWb`(fnnrpA#=M;;R~j(Lv*M zBKX`7*B0G1S8XIz;Jp4#0q?ZE^KgyP2j`II{_yUEE)Tdrkp6VG=bG>%Vp-A0+`lRR zmGLoxmwWiYTS5A@|9$|+#|-||>n%Rwu}xSf`in9?gwg!wfL(UTbGs(uGslzo)UL@m zFXRKqBlj)zi}6Vpg5+aBf5?QsM|*R3QRXAHt5MOeQR&(JK^~6^l0n{saGo0sSTs{7v)g4JSM0!?%7=*hx6WHx_bklz!R2gdfWIM&dllQ{M1% z1NLDeuH|n3yI5->)HiO1rC|PWqKt)n!K98$c^^Tr!N>g0{5bFnJ+&PVH8E3^-nfND zgU{n!68Mdq9{wZD7|7@OI}JR34rt@;_OpZSFT`Pe!uNUf*F{{~{d20$f7@Tr;B^i7 ze^>6`iT2m!cvAkD(Js8+uz^pO)3^|W`%&?@|57VH-{127dNTODj;rzKxbkZ3lT!Pn z0q4B?II%@Xjf7_c=W*rx@G&hyfKy&7;}v;B_`hst>HhktfcS z&z2$myguT1*}z|Zt>jnAcu^j6yyQ4i9w)$$1jut9r{c5B_l^HJk2q^mMvDB6!T0G? z&fn_ly(;h>kt%hF@uu**V(BT1IR2D>8Mu$e`DX@ivBR1t*!?&5*Oeveiv@pkuAjSw zc;h46>C=z>O#Z%QJot?pzWrGnB%iE`d`bqN9P#?0WNuk!o) zG#+t(%c)1J%0R!1$`JA5@hBFbWj>8ZcATeJ`qqmW_nF82pKz+zT}0$F<8G+y=l-J4Y__39BV@D%oHW@6Tq{9$L|$7)bj6h zVS)Tm<$hEGVPY%=gCm%Epaeq`x0IkPT(Ql&u74h+pfA}o(ed8a_lNyRc z`V^73{Qb=JmzvjR885C)ekbSncXH6MAK3(wcR`;UW&cOxFY|Rd;ru+c2Y7msBIDRb zpMJ&lc-M}Jvt<3I`@%1_Z^Z}O%S-m@EWo+`PE-1yk?W6N1pmPM$I|7vRKL!N^D+1x z)?QyUd&}3&WWS++kavMsxzlDFmUF)N8MuCw&+@Bw^PU*ZFKHM@*=7%T9Dn{E3CAbt z$#u1CpXq_{-wnBMYhT)vtzV-{oSL)!LQ@K~;=0IwJIf>fW%@Q;EXT(Ic_(=5UN&tZ z*YCo4<1|rE&pR&+e7}kGv;A)Hz8(10WI2BP`+$k3#rUi08hJ>rKmM%9FM~(;Ik`yV z#d7^AsF&OSyDBHI$o^R%$L&8g>;4p3zX`YXj!)5!OIPW?m>>F6_>P?_9mXf6MwkkmLB3{cij{SwH8O;i2$byPT)zRN{7F31q=Y;^I3aIE zeA}F<@~<3!7jTZRKBU=NxqsV%yHVzIq`sB?GvK@j<<&f$H^}*8cq;tk{2E(+$1igJ zxDXc;c>P+hkbmD+X8>*iekpVLJM>-{I(+>D|1{--UGq={&ma$JXwwUxbX26?}3PXCgODT zih+MZn(1CYLR3-pa;{Tiz$X&LA@RBJFAaKAwwp_Y7=;SLd0#&Pa&X2r0~a-Dg3KhVbG2+qYoDLj}rE?e0bb| z&omNlhaCTIx4O%%7jnB>fICqhzC9sSpDnL7RLGfEGiP_^M;LweyCKK*KmYVbF?F`Q z&IR0qvgxPRF1aM!kR|-$edBy74R(YB_gx1)6ZNMdPA2e+o;@BB!5vj44&otNjUZI)SRDHT?oM8-T%y$34G@LKIwd(^2s<> z*r$IX{QhpzhPv{2oTk8EJ$`ap&POBU%qUwWl+W>dUrAU`T7kDb^r{?>*Iv6-Job@I zWM?9H=L(MhI+&d<;D)C|-VJ6aA*+_AW-Xr43=htsd7@ytmvd1%yL!XLYRN**~d_44V{goGNxR71H_j}vT z#Xe*bc<;C(Hp=?VokYK6{UI+d9hUWHDD;OvPWemLpUU_v;eVHqT$w!Xk$pDcQNZ6V zwPW!zufuJE?yVXysK<~(eB>wVR2j_ z7lV>;>X%mOGtHyCkHOE0@IG9p&!+U(c=u)HgZLiIAG{ChguV-1zn?+-gq-6fM||G* zVErlJ+wXU_XoKiiKHuR1zs<-~Gju`pEB8r^Z$!LS?EPCC$_)x9Xxz#`zv26Q7VwGU zjk`9gsc5%M>|2gnW&VTrEva1+!RLLzX`?!~Qpbo2XnbXVGq7LJ@%*D?rHdNyV2-b! zrm#MgYk$?`4*`$rGrSf4@V@1hx?!cY+4cFK3*ztTvR%9H9N4W6+_&@dd4Dfvyy&NA z!q;gv4z|qikDu>eD&i9Ph2Rg4*gjg5n3GTTI&nY6yj<{eU$F00y8`vuRtP)|`j!-1 z+DMZUsE_vtRI2w%PPC|09sh37DFi&qFMck{JwVu%{G}*6zI6Pe@dVL_ILECL^}qY7 zwpE=Wcyjy2H4@L0ar=eF?Y*M`kF}D&4%n55a!8fSM?%0O+>P`0m7>1=X~SM3@#?<<$;%NsDz{HDl`{<+>8bYlk`sdiXi|aXoiN?CM$kB;%>T`8oQY6%4J*7VF}> zz2KGCWB})N(fs45>sD)dX#?bS_HiN~*w2fDzAmVNpA?6v5a9>+quTS1%nFh4%()`p z%#TH!9NQ{9Rws&hkh~4@tbdDYX-|!W#{=hna&G<4g+nAfNm2jf3WG0dfy?<7pDF4$ zKNaP+uq{i~9$^RhN(b4)_GUoutOs59Xuu;pQY-vrdwcveFDeAMT%Y}!s3+bg`p2r# zFT1PVf%Qd0Uo6VDLh3TrH9~ATMcZ-!@Fgw_u!L7dJ*%s9_+>ec_t4cZ{~Ii8C+86Jvq z<;2T(H0gnHvO=E&Wyo)P7wV+?TsY5hviGo;3=L8rw?ALkC!RRiL7fszVg`6|BigPC0grHwTVyT~pO(6hzSc^3G|qFsFL};zKo`V*&PO}Oc-;b8VNV!JjdbWhUq_sNI2`~{Or5ow;FPOS|RU1xn$Kri&m0P z#Ci7XkgZ%E9dPoiE&OVH_=HJi4fHD=@(W{j)=*10`;`fNO0m^*H4+{fk+WZv+7VGI zM8esxMC8w&c5V8q&Dr%wLq3+vO$$3}CHXjF4El?){<-QXl6B*SC7)xzU^la(zbV zGoze+Yo}Ew)n~_f_PfZ%JA*=jliwYntYy`V^(tq!-!`mkoRD{+oPYaBgD{8Su^kjA zE9Tn-_?-&=ME%ybdekTLV{tu@f_%sXzuc`CyK#;m{8rTX3@9@mMP;9siL`=4U=KzeIw>DVueDj?!%L0A|`1$|PTzxk_kgv?I$b!OO zYu&d~D#r!#mH8C|zUlhObyaMEd}V&cfq!+IV{FyfoP5eJ6YNd`@B1@X-PORO_EhdO zr-65@XR%t=Y3|m=g|FF2lgM6A6Y_k0kJkH1j|Luxa^mo1R{mZA>5nTU<};2* z^}$tr`=Uz!c>lUYx$viIGoix&#AU+1H0a--vMOFsQpCZ$zTls1r(g?x$IlQW9?Vl9`W}+$X~XX z*S3h3{YzYd?}_01fXjMy?I7oyO`$(RSM(#f{uto#DD8KDs42(CxH6~y=YMtlL6%Q~ zTq??sy6?IWCdEG<_GbVOse8DEUcwX5e){4f4pE7rU*!Vs9drKkdw~0J7WneOKMuw~ z&)NR(eDhB3Z7+yLdU*WglJ8NE>NT_~T1s2|F)-xoU<^($D$C_MO;xw1;e8vZDSE9r@bI_9XyMLwTzE zvFf3c{!E>_j6z;@eeMBye6j&&f8Mz;dVPqb zKOQ)@cd_>u=GIDh6yqqzk2&~xE(uS?dG3$Xx4f+r4m?`r{dpVY1NXN`v|k3~p1xnq z9bpMvhjN^G{?nHcamu=wwlKF@mE)jxQRa~u`~%H)w8~@3L03`SqhOaEyl*zRTkv~} zNuP4vl?YyDuGaDSj5+lYU%Bo|0Y9Xn^=E@2kRPd7cX_~HZ%Q=qyEa&g*4fH+7h$v> zOT#+IXcY0Wpd_50gRx1U$#332<=@5m>DH4?+4&TrN>r@x5+r#qFN>cI;*u{3TEy9V z4eQ&lFV)M3w?6;xD5XKqva7LEXWbjX-#63h%L=>Mh6Rh3zc0z_qJSGpit%Pqn+IDo zh$s0I1Dt<{$Qt*%Dg-#Si}H7OY~VMTGjj#cfm|QOS?NDvbUl*{`{NmY7hU7p8KXkW~q`#jB~<#{hA zT*Su$Uf;e=Zu9s_af*)>>ux*nw=Z7WLhV$$c;3Q*^R~T$=fvm3iGY!m>GwF4`jz&W z!Jk~KMb8LhAYW;Z9sImA?o6WJ$5iT9+LH*rd03~Z^t_tPr+%5D=tpkwDTdzm(7MZu zaXn*rw9Xc2Aotqm~t5W*mt7BO{5ja2ha;0L7vs2UaJ`26^Q>Osu=U#T#>NI)7 z%OytEpAMYAXZz+w?)VCMuODXpaSH#U@@%TL=UfHfqmQKDSW(1>{c{v-Fs#agsC6uF z2G0KVO#EeUt)UN@I_6*Ldrc(yr>d0GzXpGI$hR}Z z;oBzi`461^%X7wPe1GUD-_O94e`et9-w!7*|2Vo-zhYzy$y=l=Kfc4YYwhfmzs|5Z^UK1P&V4=ygMljPHSh;iBs{N<-#j|ol8 zmbck&SxTNAq?H;%39VWdv{C_(ivKL67iOTt}oMADM3k|L{*^lEWR$ z6ea0bDfo8qpMAcz2#<3t<;@qJ5&bz4yn37Z56EZF)~B35-Qek?L(3bitSOtXoUc6K z=bE-;Uw%u@`Go9M&R53DB5s~Xt9uqO2lAEkl?D8Lv$qZ}XbR*j?Qwv=y7to5g^YoG zr9Ce2Zx*c8sIVcBue2u}{MR2oUS7l-7PSbC?=P*xl=CM6G_R^KuNbNb|IH`~r}b{E z^qJNj%KdM?@6__I8#CoPS${@x(JvW`m-PAeyA?Re`PS!UbIQ?qdOt=oU4os|r8q9F2P!Nn&2)akoUHg+0m~8p7kcE(!g`g7wumO)mT;Umx>2 zFb;a7r+1yq>k5ijEY7UpR z#QV82z<-+eMcr_7AU{f>KeC#LM^se7DfD}5O8rWEV!*dtoI5nyER_65vM&?t#rYqKgY2Z@~z3r(r;JpI84xDqe-zS98LE}zTb>T0! zL-Nq4`{i|B3~*itR@A=RPG0BPfb%@HXz-*X@;WabIL||g+F=KI{G@$Z{+)hQz*_5GN&oMg!~kdi9)14q z52KoWNL`WokJ<*D{hRQ{(QEnC(OVgh2hRRo>9kFEX5_&)z%@z0OVA1Lk-m2JKf1j2 z!{~pneqD4=F-{t>o>|`GQA>Fp#Ot&S=s9@)*Y5HmbsfsnGxV zs;=+J`ePu^{VR3+g~jqZ%LbhLSDyNtiv*p56Rs{TvEZWw_3OcB{h8nwx}2Pg#~GHQctml3 ztR>?1@vfr-4fbq(%K0l6y!PGB^~`T&P1$_qd=Ur!K9wV*fFj=N_%YJH(c8F z7L8GA5gOlLTGuG&F9K*@(_>sufP5-S!f73rE`6qc$a*vKh;>rA0(VMWyVdom(3gFm zo`3giQNdtx%o}O=y)8=}5yw6KeqX9J zGEs?)Su!E(DZ^C=YlH-IwF7VI%(*GfSACLVd8Q;1U@Au*FUu+d5^L|{0LS05mQ(A-7~MDL=Zpx@2g`!;=sS(?LqZm-z$vF zn{%C;1U}o#zh}kkLH_-xmo3{y^S&){=?LauCiIOgKJb(O#lNU}!oO}YH;4T%{>6e{ zzoxxhF#jC+gnztVj|ZRZrFKfjXSsdpd>ZUdllb(WbOX+tP_i7CT#t?_@E#sXUYzmu zr!alA@RQC_J{cAHl=P3dk0x;MymT+;eQWK}(*;6&s}7R)?*Bm_&l_2v{FJ1X@I>G| zZ=`OnSwkn`DZqJM*zwo8)==QouAB$9yTXoi@Vj=1$j!gk#r_dLI;86 zH@(w0*za~lWeC0eo=y|^ect|J;`epR`g#0F&l38r;II8Fc5Ut`W{Q&R;r`93XZP$6NpV>QmwcKLPa|+A+1chLlMM`J=3t zVBdQ=AeVxY{qf*4+d+KtN8d0z&%N#7f4_eU-p^)fAfBrYeH@t;WIPGD-j9L4*2O-3 zL3PXZQM{5B?_GZf?|egNCe@%p02!rDRO1v^ur=lGxvD}&e>@ZL`k_}Al3+PE%? z2_3$1M`0(Or}!p8&iKBF8_QboS@xIWYr}aVpFOXpt`YMke-HS{`$K+KzHgJp4esww z><|3gAmpvqOxk?odBA=^8tSWZ^wUxN+>T%izHxU=<56~ZHQ%leqMyf!B-ot{euY_=`{h#f zd&;*o#kidTK6yy(Y*PH*5S^#-$fno_vEluyo3e_kwI*U^AH-M2)$)Oe)8Pwm%IS>R zT>6jr%D6hfZ&^R2MzHtxDC6V;-_WVexFB)zkEa}`bnw3#+VLjENj@k}9^4=EU1)hh zL*wjmf#PJwXF0!VzKw+5Xq1d|$^C;%tE880@b;6iIO#m)o$~iP-1uFRcg{uE53=qE z7>C@@mp6Q}C)8UJ+e3Adzflcxj>{@@w!iXw{e3rxyfQov<=&iGAlNv>&j(we=S=h~ z`~NZy#ev^;>En7FBeIbWihF>a-t#mLnIM;hl4aBIS@xI4ArH=zUWzaGQ=V^l9Ezy$ zI`O}aLov8t-KNMpT6r8&?q^$@hhnA*904flyTKJ6Mp~j`ouf`Z5-k_MT38( zb;rCx;^ZHPI8HY3dpSq_7Hk}HDaN4$@HtMY_$=o)jYEm>GX*8%Typ>5GDFf!y6K>C zNYy-h9Po`p`2G^V|J{T4Crs|Q_D_wOq_Pj<^Y=><-WTh@Sm@hW`R{olf%8Tfzb~HG zS@Gb%EMOTQ$Fd&z_*IGY9gO{lE%-y$-GW8@&DCKiSXyzzKc}`@IkI8w2@D`%}RG zICIdQ0){}o@_Nw&zU^4)$MnpIY!9suY>M@PF($hoc=JbVLqFmBNSk*&{>`h#cTj%W z!RPlI#dOHiRGpZOJAqr!PSJO^7Y>(j7uSdPBek3oUNb_%-N5;MOC{^qdY)UtJ;3=s z)uSTU3g?k2%a@JNHa5^e&{_o=p7Z(YbI;TGV0eNw$lzv%`Ew*%*W_LkjO zUe7P#PT;&Ba-(wJd<7)j1)SGiiy{};3TET#NWA};pI3TRd*s>E)tB2;-h;*u59Iki zPVdTlJ@-o#zRtLz4gAOVjk+{yP{hzY;W%)O2{?~W+9HQD_nq(CoaHURd3>r;y4=H? zeLq;jxE(l;PyY-a^KrzFA+=b)6L=Lm;XUR(|M25^R~M|H|H=N0VL9)^g?*p9@BRf} zU18h}dG_yeGtIZNwl7a%+yk8N&`P)mIOp$|XGb*BW#el8UOVScY{#|6 zo_*hIN)}N3O&^N*aC}{je!o?{_JDJYTYz(X^Zl^l{nU0{9s}3dfpdIY?)^CFM%eED zEbj!)@oh4}Hh2HeMZRF%1)Sqs|9tsI<-aRGk@dTQ*Ps*L<3!eH>F2H$=lt-$_rrnr zti;SP9o3}xsN|nN{)TqK&w>tz|NUo#n{b}vKX7NtMy(`o0nYMu7oR(%lW;q5fBfHk zdNec}SMz%aIQ|o=g{C@3O`D?f9u$8UdD4A+uI~C?gq~B@7+4Cb_M66J-{^{ z;2i(2UPXQRm#s!KmN&E)eslZ_xz*m>2r;Q8$J^L^ZO~<*IE5th=iMf^ZYXU(eut)3Fq~b z1-xD#HtegDaIQZd?~nMpZR2yYekbJkeSR4~l&mQ0cLC@5YsaN4t7QFLzZ<-D*4P=L zLF(u4k&l`+?@$i^Ey91EpS5!n56JeJfb;z5-kZO!Y@Y}9TEP49?5){hQvG(|cHl>v zjy|B5a5vh;34H%hb=O=H?!tMVUkg9zzA{|GIX^6@XW{+4x#akGAkX#p%0IuAT)%38 zSch_cbW0iXl^h>ahn)Gbi>JmF+hH=lq+L z0&d;4A zBCpH#dw}!$>1vB5ea5r{wS zTiB7`dc4QM4qm?8{SV~EIHtlud=KU`C&q0j_&w@=csx%EGet>!C+2qp&y(OE_|aM; zuPc!6!g`3W_dMWtur5Er>spqg@!O5{qp`DyPm7Ty2NX)ou0P=V54^>p`QH?FvZic4 zUqAV;|G>{0^tMY8N6zaH@{g~d{MUcrw`x*oVo`e_Kj8Wg{D=c>`$t*>`O51jRTtss zhUx8^7PAEM*?#}^ANbGrru|ji9LQ(;c^||I{`%qzF8m*5Zyw;{_5F`$_RQE~DPs?c zpfnU66hRStP&M|bEtV4dP)qD%kG0d~2_GlbxUK z_z(QWwbzy^p$g`U^Kr`KKR?AkuSTd$IIhxuD&u9sR^a~gN8uLsx8S=J$B}eh1bkH) z@gMyB?}ds@gZ!3F?{}g7A|L7fvgB`xXB+jNx9gtE04gP>wL|&%meMk?i#I%j;mNh(?I;+-+q`Ga9YHv>e=id$~=(!yUl$iXHyn7W?yFXDnm#iT{i7-~vwfIe50p`757e$O-aO zaK%r=!vMY)TZ`UTGD^Y$T$3o{;2JIU6kbrLhd3W5exm=C{U-K{^X@5#qaO0wPvrR) z6aMD5i1Y3i>=*JPA2fAjd&K*{t{0Q7RKKrBCT_-sLSVV}s$OzRgUM<%qBa_M-F)8V+d z00ulN3G%c~INmm&HB2kefP6T$Px^~YiJIZ8Gv^%eur$cianRS!N0B{SULyO#(t*=) zP-R_YlxxJ$tmBkS;1r*EKm6dBZEu-_^v8FR{!@G|IOiVe*Qjh3o&cQ2ZQl1DHr`&S z&}6bd5qMd#!~biwFZZv9@zq5N3)%cxr6TETkz^T#tP1@@*uuJ5J! z?g*{q2;7bRG%g|v_un7+77w=!mgh^!-*e42c1xaI@3GL}mk(2S4fc0v`R&@T=PjB> zxDGh^JJTHfpmXKzk@{CV;dv-p1i9}?XDsX_-AkNRl?;bF;& z_KVkPa%q0fa;G65ma1rf{FO*ukr#V5kbXDt#$t#6_bg)dv$pT`SuOrA{7YFT^O26L zpUynFXx=-~SB_<#LlTdA*BeDF&A zU*I}xaC}EyHoV@tc;zkNVLnCsZP%^1y}&keJmKo@!Q=g}hRX(2j_zR3(hodvBEY}% zbfZb9eAROPCUB9@M&P>TGS2j!hO-y$&j>dO*4v-pyI~Kln=Fw3_W1H;5r(&1@jt=$ zp?{6&#}x24)v9|V)O`mQ@V#G4d)(mH{wC(zC~dHQfBd3+7(bcdm90AN5?yZ<@lC+^ z>j2TUCHws5J^fkWG)KVy9x{G3o@pLF(cx+DP~%w#z6IMqT<-K3*d_EOqCJ{FQoyU) z^5pVR*AtcNxHRy4a=j zaQnnOX~R58*OxuaUVpzvs&F3+eP_PV<*@7g`xDxp=vO=^G-hp2AANs9>3l%mBWWumjk2>u9?*Tadc@HIeqxzt^XdE2k}byx z-FHjzcY!~#-<|8xI%2-nPxm`e{4>Be6v?wXCUDmJt&FgT?lYqJYd@3mac=T-Rx9E! z@{Hoo`$goL3hkI6ADFoPP1*1_=Zic`!G2+l=vOcLm3S$4I`oj`>Nx!L{f7MO*N%^`l zD+o^nPW8NP{DSk|h&L^OhbI9qE_V2T=HVM>XbL>oFa9s$oC2Ker|X z1OKmPX;bOmE%HIMPv1%Nf%ltXV2VF|13!UNe#G~Yaj>e!&!jl`@vQ!<51B3pn(vz0 z)V*2!DdL$(a;O{sul^%@k{~xTeyjiCVEGgFBw&9kww98|Y&_mc@WTy!^S)0P6yki&F*}1&Buk@4V?eGdaO7Z@p@4^x8`n&i%ZXflx5qd1!9#5mV3;QWQN&cUm z_p{z&EN~0tlCg~(HfPff}IMust+9eBm%qn#rc(?_4 zU9rReJ3VV#m(y#1?j-*2*B`0;?wvW`xWM@o;Qse#%JylVG|zq9Bup<*>AxE|)sv_* zLw};@am08`22SJ9hre5Hto1z|M@emR{JIt2`BV3o?MIa!W}tb3^Of~80sQ+p?kgYf z5dKD~(Y^(|N3Lp3S-xb&s|^}iTCe$*8eeujDE<`vk&N#HtCz@i)|QknE?xd{U*J7^ zBA)5c8wUAx-?R!G>xe%C^&U9Qf0_7u%s+9T{4f5+50LSw^0L?f8fR!K;9m;#8NvIs zPUJD3?{4H{67cEgSNEf1eX(v(&hJ9EnD^5$@1#I34O@Zx*9qYs_P2;LU1z2HGv|Bn zo{Yrth?r-T_YtZFO1~_(f9@P*5L(~<1Yda{p%(n7Essx%Mm~~+;4AMVG=Xn>`MM;n z_c@>Lx3rNR&t?CvJyEW{T1!m175ZuYM(4YnkkkF^tre@u&ZqSo-FN5(|K-`1W5oyk zC|`u6h_~t^**>kGHG^b)Bpx0~_ixhrdFg3scc2A{_5@!PE?h9yY5ME}@;)4FB$ z{;00u40iyhasAnxN`FQG_xm5MjF$`i$LWUEYMpF{{uO*>yu9E?G#K$9_CMCU6fe!^ z(*NmwM}Mu1m&jX+7muS@?;6mK0rIrowc>Bi7wg?*>=(BCu@_XUX-l=;{~qGrBYX83 zR-T;nZ$*6|eQxM69c|gF^^H3&K@<9D%+i+T($D(z9Wtzs)W-G150-u(Uh~@1x7_k| zq=)2aOKXCjeMe*&#r2q>r|90-A6>Xz>#EQr^4J+A=O21rm##k!=)81AltZxI{sdp8 z;HN_G^H+;2MBCqT#s37~8Y%VD^S$Zd4;X#Ec#JJO-{X*ZuO5PY$Ngqg-RbYEL-5VO zjd<@x0_57PQV*l|AW$p9o@BId$NJC${^Il&Z{p0s<52Jo3VsUsxz|+c8{)l%F`4Lh zx-Q@b|BGj5`{gub*YAQIWKSme<1V+@A)ex=d=fqgdt3u$e2A~J$~Zl^Q)o_ZZFYVF z_+(Ea_=^fZy`0BirJ; zJxs=7NaKVL)xiDz9jzP>I`9sDHluuOvh;)g6@2A*FoOSSgLjI=B@t6@1z$NHlE7cv zFk?*)OSb%oR*r{M@HaLyU(K1Aov$1Z>EJJ0F!zsK#_W9Mcu)_QaXG*0?#|o^A^3{% zkO2Nb^X{ZPy6k-Ac(8yU|K-v)n)vK|<#D#^W`g|0%e5~@8M5_zw)gN@!T)Dy z&N-phQ_APV9N>TQTcOzhT2FbvvtT_{A-&Gm|FxdVx*k1J`fs^Z_P~Fwr|5YyJ@|ch zEgqpem0Yo}zf^!5=oOSImE{rzl=#@CS{V;!ws*U0842K*EB)#>wSky&E9Orfu4B;k3=8;8+MK!;tIy6)z;z6|o{<86 zpMT?~s(Rhn|!7w3qWhCiJUTe_lM)xTWXhlmC!< zbxATlwF|oQ#)Pn+o|AV&ZzA}QcW*nJBZU2QoI=mNCxaht>gvgvy*_5Uex3&YA4&5j z=2Fy0F%Hd&ap(hI#3ZnekCt)cc_ivz)_3~mNPOk^XMa*W#XLrNL-#YK;r$2YPFJcD zWfR)p{sf=$MoZ7XjFEBd-7&IpwDm1l{7>*HZ@hRvy94~kDevcqF=yvf-k8AiVC!A+ zb8&U{JkEMw0_A~fthA?4`Ca2<4cYZ8^FR;&vad_6h|8V_(aJn9gWvw0lY>I!LDuyK z$^$$2WpkhJD)NB;M0}Lj!Cc@s9O`T%@__$D9+=S2bUc*-zTolxp?D`_{+PO?)7S{J zV7>hX`Ul_Rw*D#e!|;WSpJm`DM`@lU3Bgy6J1h7LreB*CV%%lDpMu7n1N_-@!Zw8% zciH0Y0e{QNZ+HDK@m7tK_U|t;{L%jsZ$0?lE(dj?;_X$-xI`fcX7I(IA|7sh$31DJ zJYJ*swhSw@^j8{Z{}n$c^mRV;{LudrKQH)&cT~;%U*e}3FXIvQa&_+iC4L6*)4iW> z`(NT`1>gQ`NP4LF`HIW<(R}9sU&KVzEf4GkxND zbd}QBR|L2O05l=%CvyUYr^d@J5w=N0*+#&LIg7kU4S7w?JLTkZXF)RxdCew?3CM(XjRy|cLr zuJm7(4*K!=UNcGhQM=!eG^$+!Pd+WGNA^E>ye;d!JOZcdsAll)UbF6@ei3-`O4$!I zZj&!2|Tfkw2%BZUHZk}=v&;2b`9`9dFEg9dH?9% z4VIs`_bmo~e-G=3f6Tfr}TvyuNhwAuM|osII* z0sg2mJIB!VBa#ySQT}=7O6;dm3$}j4lWMhdr5g-U$J0p1fPG2{=DIdRvX)+#^ z|ASQXQi8@WaLV5>{rbE-e;o?_>l<{r#PvHA`g^_?QJ(8}0jKkdJFSnCF)b{y4$gU!_@-P{+ZPUs~`z z;5TWTnl}d}f(%Dseo*F@YKDx@f;raj>G~z;sz7|8R}WtCO`j&wz4`*TA+OEA&-Z`) zQ{d)(zY>9Kf!lx&eQ~E(el#F(I^J}bm*aG1{K>Mse$w-VF31-ybMP9?V?y4G{pmU> zzq3I5VZ45+lBItsz_+B;ddlmUCZFs#EqFusym^n$4{1h;8-TYko!T46?APKtHQ`57 z`yJ)D4RY4DQcuFgD;wB#@F)jxx^6!t&)*ZNAB2A%$Z5g5(kJFLx6h0H_Gxk)FS=^} zowu)=Dg7ru7k<^fK5t(;My_{A|Kg8F4GYrWTH+M{pW>5`v-pSE=)8?qw*TJYfuk4R zDs)4H$Zvn74eitW5`L^QXcEE~$PWi_>i;}1`aR_RZwBtdw%e!6_w)J7i~ZF9Enb{E z7u5f=g8RR0>#J0;l>ob!^dYeEu>cJ_hhK*QZ~P!?+UTU-we_P4P2>H)3#H z8pWCWYk<8r@C==%eaZV<3)~6(>*lRm^ZR66=x-13u-p%x@cU#kus`J!nQtAI7kfhU zhVa)6dChDYmmH~YmQk4yxC7%!4}ATbUR4Uf0fEzc%8YT{>)q}0p$XaFQC7&Aq34IQ zuXgczK;QkO`E5drhG)Z=ewxo{zASj=M@tk86zvmE_0D!_PUe3G;_CrE^K!N2;{EyJC*(cAGk{mD{mETgXNY`N)_=`h8HXt= zCcH~|BDG0SczoR(REMa) z1YenNUhtQvRBj)t9@&6v=1c!yo=(v4dSn1@0AA_-_Ex+eseqe-$DKNKmDi)hPIBE( z{@=83sKe(cy6@2ed2PL%yU5N!KEEr+Gs)YBZPf7irwo_%*9&=#tKKI({wllli|&j3 zV1PM+&u=bj7rZx%Vpnqi6FUdnKj|BdmCG9-XU2BNmUj#C_^1oXdP4T?{G;k|Zl4Wu z4s1KmS#q4m&j$Nkz?<}3zMRIXh!5qz7X9$aofikWe$@i$zX5t8@~2x?PMXV-?wd zD)0>0_9(FRwzA#}eX09pKAOSnf9Jc(IhZ}P-Zegx*Oip(T`%TUC*(Wmmic(Sq~m## zuTiE$9A7VaAeVvd;q~|a z9>?i?4e75ptV27l-wOS9Z0l9`zrO+nERfIG@5Hv~(RWk0{~GM~V7nozM?;=38Q4$x zkp5!hYMu{tJVEDE9+dhv=zNHNG5p7OuA?u0WT5Nx0s9Dt|J|ZL^xtGD9T2!3-|Mx4 zXWMz<7Uh$`4Olmje^p1@TXXxJq#x}^eb#Rz9Ulht1NUItH0Jawx(+39?+CeGr}o2s z{Iv;hU$aE|NAlIiFWMUkCPe?53s zY$s{QlnZr!CIf!h!RxRm^CLR%BHE*TrT)56>c}FVFJ8z|zMianYctOm)l%s%#oO}T zf(d*)P=9E_QBrTn#{S%`-8rNZ3fSM`EG9>PaF1AJn~r&{77-|`xj{% zCHsqxkG}l8b>Nv*5mDj43-aXuhWI5bgZwA^kdG5S8?rCR|1X36fAZ~;8r**^aPsfr zk{Unrd~ra(0lbaZnr`O(W5#}3Zx?FReT=xDF3W!Oj}5$BFO%lwW;lI^oBTWKt{Jp` zbdi1VZ&j#bq?HSfB>g?-Usa7v`}mlk$BPV*M1YTt8_cXD-~T1+7b@ zcd~!Hu+IeEk8$g(^ZAeLqx_sOv|}H>e$bQ+Uf(=Cy(*}GT+mD7t$S2*(D_%#bF44G zOKCOeJFY)r9_FvFr2iBC-PwWGUxD$8`ON`&EqIxQH_L~?$yxta=dH!( zV=MO4`MRkKYyXqmAe9Jt`p!1>cZmW|Ej*u{3i&xDo2a6hyazbNvq#}(H+X%@08aT( z?$ET7RG&oqcHo+?WjuD*9oR7s)33*Vnm?NMnda31=kcQYY65>yl{3@wBCn;lGF}ek zhZVdwM&qn}EdTYWe-y7`Lz<*=e_fEH`Sz@Jcq8sF)jz^3RV-YVj}O%{=_g$unfh?% zb3XpF>K}L`s}@)vRR2gG^FqWwzb}ks@ye=y;C&xi^iCYZZ6psrl19B(E(gQYK9KoI z`B44CTX}dsxJVxDZ~kVfgU81Uoctfsq-Rwg9|v&Nav6sq3p53Dvi7yuPx(@C_okM) z7*6$v^!I69@G~A?C;E@_#hkF(9;;Oae*S!mv!u!Skk*aARN1wJ<_}(X zd1~cuUT-KKgkRo%U@^yOKdmo5zOg-?=c5ztQoU>2I5O*X(LA0W@DA;{_LA$T^>+sF zdQ-G%RPV(2*Q}I&sd~%fl0Dm>b)>q^$G08wdhk;Ym9i`2#ran7P2m5P(PbLNjmOsn zo(;TWk20hA@s<<&=|1a~O{UGvW6H{>D5{TykJww@8O`tv$WxrJ^jUw0?&k~mze@T~ z`9AKi>W|e--UE3(c$H_Kc%fmq3Hxciu;ti|sp31T;wSW5fzx>KR@&QHeBVp_5>%0D zJLVfN>VX0IW+%Dcw>9|En0675s4z4)!b(Ob^7}i{s;T@b(pmi7E=7u+IQoy;}PD_`S1{#Tf3z`2`*D z={5h(NzZNzc^A&F8G-Lbpc?7yn`DcMfugGm7 zp9(p;&eUh0sVh4VnDzYTq}d(g!~8nG+@d`bJ>^KIaKSGh=7T&vzqvfaI3uk4{3e8} z*GRwV`AtiMALEyQQg;LJa2@dLVu$~CN?$fvb2tfE{N1$!KrnhxgO|DWzL4c8WN}W1UOufob>Z4+t{^L;|=6 za#SB*Z}_%c1j8x+NY9uNC)K&)ldC5GG4jP)>_N!C*6-g$M?g> z)&4l>_#Sd}{$kdP?&tXV0XuLyKk@PD72oms-U-};vb963Vh4ld+oV@ zbbM|H&p7mS*P!(T>~_NcQj@B7=eS3qe_humF+4s_;2GHN-k84#kB=VvHQ!1<#{S)L zChuQ8_S5yqs9oiE)BGs%$ByGwicjp6VH0_LtdOVptQ>S`1&@y%IQh3|Ykddz\V z_tms$?w<*`2iw0ood1sIWnmxnuLihw-p@IB|61XHBF0&Zis#4i{&9|z$K(2SGCmE> z5l(KO2K!Ce4xGGkI**?f`ze0f<#$)``1xAO^)B_(_PG;Ua{ru=Cp&tq{%{}fKM!!~ z-wO5Sw&VU~0M}!Cu${RLx6jyGwr@uq1{JL9<^Ji{OTWqf56T=3de4CgIOTDxqcz{< z_G#Kk{gfYrlP2}&`C*4V{zT{^!Q`s?7UO58R6FEM4(MynPM!+p)cp zP-+YJ&x!qH-yhS99OC_FMP5_>-a0igjK?p7^uzvhvo;^)`K{RyZ2#xYW9xDMJk&mT z^$zDQ6e_-Ce-3j*9JgOj?c;ug^K-U(czmqTYsa>HqqTo?|D4!Q{(r3PwS~7&_d{6G z&f{+z*W~fdApL0Hz5DN=`x!JFrT=7S_jbKwdHbq~a{N>N9vO5fg6FRZ@|3^TBf6dE z@z(>lV%uXzp3_10lYPJ^RPTC~*RKq;PyWYhCuF^!Qq(smt#*Jo^jKkW^rAzYbNp`9qz~8I>d>^gT{A-v0bDc9{*vLLTh71cVRQz^i zJ)dobo-beT@p)_MDhh%hk4(XSzs|tV^q@f_{8!*nX}~EC|E4@U#PieyJRRGGl}_De z>&2)HjFU{@{c~;lnBRw>LH&#WPR1ej(xBV?z9bXo;RN9BVu%0Y_d#fYCjx({iEQ)^ z0wv-^V~)0zBfW+Umy1Eavph~I(9^HmvuLa9LQ@e75eFLQbi7xf*Y}6{bGKf|(R#3F z@0L&K{z@TF$6=(WW4n{D!?Z%X)KBX{!avEO`-6{XI-WLsFXME|{&O)tUOW^B%%>%j ze#yG6KhTf3f64~=fA_5H$n{gbCfrt_`f!e$6!W$2dDK>lrO@w%UK)>!dSnK@@0IGk zYO}QeK>2lF@jUV<^uMQj_YJRCTF4o&?H1E4==y*Q?VEv{3N`qX$H#{KG@pLBZ2l*_ z9yk^C{15l&bl$!L@-A#wommye>jlM++Miu7ES|?tt7!jJx4N&ne$@{$E?R6q|M~kC z+MssjZ);Gmsr^6eUE09yb3opO?afm!@A3Fke5ifZ%~20{d{tYd z-yW=MZ+tQ$>-@inj}|!DcjdtThFm|bSG8#0a=2Do9v?I0X}vnIg{v2jj}5p1^4ijk z`g8jn!0GP7V-JsMdJ^6rEO;{G~bK( zn1LIBAD!G}IG<-T(XI;P_vr6;gT|K`ayD$=Yg6PyJ`Z~#=K!7_9{D|=haIS|F5qW| zPHM*IVKZw=NM{pa~&oH(Cj2JXOiTHUXTM4=t2 zP0rUeAG^Ry+kfe|Xl4&xPb7b~Y}sFd`=i+*<3RUAO-SzgG@QxP^+Y{*E1pho9>H+q zOnE)S1bk=v`61#>pB3*6=()V-+w+mYMZ8^DFL{7#ew6XZtlz;H1v{j+;CSo7 zTV-n!kND+T)%aI*YC1%9rstYQ^wl`{K&3x zS@|Q{_hLWYf4OyW-5lhHz%#qa>l_rX^=r~!v3NykcS`>$-iL;cA4u^M@@bGafcL7? zj&@Oqr@-mFt{M29eVYbEGdvT|{ZRXdS8OQ3+jl71?|bFyY2LmKxC`4sA6JTxf&MW6 zIy*)sf3&5!;j{kz`t^~ABVrw$bv&X87I7!WmBE#sc0i`mZ9mpSlNfJR}28uhmq~0xB35W3(~(!#)ago9V?>c@>F+>;ElES-K}Q+TQU^> zRW4mUlHtjaBl|bDxnCg2f8hE@QcuHj8HafLZs2r0Gyj!(dQkhoec1kcq3(rP*1j71 z)w`vie=a>cJ&xfCKgn@M{(oE0TAp%A#Lx0X+C}!Co%vkH<8Ops3$|^#Shi433VE|D zSiidXj##cgRUv=Qy*?k8r~6#p;9Z`Ydpuvq_^_Yyv+4d4o%uS2`cJ(_`af}c#T35I z(qX^(fV8t^j~aFPIwl$Vjo__4SU-`kQ*>lM@Ux|hX>zgnQXQi2o<-EGbU4DU3j9QT zQXxlms9pWveu-o_)k!ya+g9a&8O89#XR?2Mz<*o5Af4WmCiJWKO24U2CVLmRjbZXM zeo22n>*8;@ejVhE*hXX=y`X0D7VM||tR3sT8q4rx;B7x&{^u1VdT~vp0OXD*c zexyP!^3T2FbNk~NCPS7LH!td<8@!~PYo_J#^Tbd1t=cF3rgpEaKBCgt0_GrCh$NXyt|N9|^ zkp;}ulH3Y?8Cd5y!BeN**1rRuz`ct0T1~w=yC858*DU|A4%9-Q>L(eOYa`ALC}awb ztB@l*Gq65O!n#2Vxh;Q`m=JFWmJ|Nb_mAj#(nRnZ?QZ+LuwME_{|deZ`dyQyJ$BN6 zYG9KhT4Ktr;2XiG=VM&pufI9qSW!)OehTg{qvvfhz^@#YcM)CxB`Fb4H?E^<_e*=8 zxi)rW*MYOHgH{NaQuaSm`!XWXNUp@=31iW>Q!|7e7Rt~(IRp_VZf9QG1o{x%^ zr<@kJ6YbLTktKGFE-qhbu4&S4xe=}Ylw(k2R_2#iNN z>0j!U2NCE1(Y_V96WgiH+AZbx7pLTxbuJCxl^%EX`Wdc219BQ{=f7Gvm;2`-{DAcT z$hRlv^ZPw%9;Eiqmz$ZNAFpcZIakDI;q;R}-o6!j$v^T7VtLAoIa1QAN1ru@S+F5Zp-f@ z&cL`%1wLrN>3nn_v8a1?stXw3ZtylXy3#+lmU>cd1>XujJtyb`e{99lm&E%x`A_hb zbu#`J8LugWcE3>21NmZtej|ACF?;&(`(ct-OZg<=`3jXEsYRorKTWeGo&x;FmD%@8 z0T=HZQN9;MK;nHNE}N7~gIqec0{6dPBs_!t9eBSA-Y-J$H@57NbyM*DerLU3gzh(? z?=iUMu4@%$5UjU95hv|zxjr=f3OnXXeOtrE{2gg{%N73-NxxqGQ1F#_zh4+@Lg-h%f6D;=ku{sHhI+rBP4Rvgp-#LvMhm;Fkf$2yz~8)G z@!ps;>=*K)U%d*wrlRtBB7ys5U(ni|wlo$84{4la?KyaO{~?0~HSqKILstEaKP>$p zooCHINu`>e5(LptbYG3Vh-|0h%bP*>#n5?Z!V`-Z`ICGS^2yLk&%y6Clt|?DEfqMO zhi=p?;x4bBbe+M9_K$w_G=}T5&(y4@5kvE!tA;A7Yg;M4YnXXhC~-{)uW7({;*PfeSs<545EkI&yIDKEsBO7&4@H zu)a*#USB3HudM0;`Z4fuLZs()t>d895LSQlsAZz z0lc0sH)g#@g2&qkz8SpR#bU$waX4Lvumg7`{ne6kK*Yl`NXCi!Yj}6vvQYiyf&Ab{ z?=|P~$iRN;uT4`r4d(Hn=bbf2WIT?2n>vxlgW9M5I5oNV`cUngAV0jYrY>*aiv867 z?@_Dbc>B~JcJS0atF`3q>#^U7ZR_sOCdMG2LiL9Syj@pREonUysy{Noo4x7JpzGUC z#7lcr#$)=Fm{1Qw46u{`hIK-x|Gep5)hOY{025&Hbd;3x0iu zuCI|DgH}`wI`86wymhqHU&?VZ==oYNa4oibK7HptZ(nsx`bF(OZSXvXw@=sC?1;my zt>2yG`DjqcFYVr1!{cKHPI>)a{KE(yABrF8?@*#a9?~DGKgrI#(0U3KONYgfo+vHr+aaGHOGVFG1XbEKiTWICq_Bm>3wV6zU}fbls)OK zc09MohW(@`YR|fKnnOhXIDk{V7*K!r0$wj%z{%gd!-jOD_z8J0aH>1@IeWvoziE*& zZ)jfYYb;-Y{1EY{=QRl@JO3|#wI^i!4A>T%(C0Au8%p2*t6o~6$Bymuxn(~l|3m5f zf8~b@dc4@0;-Ws_@uGYryC%N(B8QsISE`XRUR1wwAHU%VXSm5D{Z|i{yfSNQ{}Jl_ zB3AGW*0qoL`$ee!5q@KC+%S&YA?L()e~xN-dHvL5zX#iQhHH1w^Nu1PGO(ZG^y=;} zdFVMufm6Mqd9Qh;;Zv!;3S55@;{$poPv4lA$HxR*i+b@#l`aE#`&Qs&e{6|`!+85t zZ_Jo?ovn_2!t1{i@>aCJ=$}e!xqTksG>^3^mA?wNFMUdI|9xRiI?3Zl{jWJC{cKTh z(_!8|)iG+n^21}3dH-0y2-fdyHfJW+Z-QPcw!R|oU*-Ds*l)+SZp8`3xqnWQhySM* zwA{u0OPLznelE>>?YMm&$Y)?XEoO2t-aq6&wSV%LM`^r$6XYm=8a35?&;8S%mT@y- z+i7ZI0dAia`ze0W)&4%j+s|6Zqn*7!`0nudI3Z8%Up=0_ncL@~_96e^VgAXyeJ$>v zr16{DG;B5>zZsC%oRNOK7}xG8x6ck-4}59(&KEp?>HbXe@154a-r(^!LC%Wp&re4@ zq380%_|lMnz+KvwHFC20l0oAK_?#z4`sHG{9k>Vh``&6R>HR)JKgCyt@!4xu>k&M@ znzPbxvj5hz290@q^}wl4h5hbn zmvTK}1F!x)cQv{XhPS7|xOafJ(Ah4P-w&h0yygM^{`OX*3P6E~uO91x4B(&Ed^Cy9 zq5fBV`y}-rK4N%}zC8yG@5AiLim(2>jN^vFy&D{P9JxSnM10NIPx0+?rk-tFt(?ig zBW=LxJL${Xe*6>DALRf}>yKNW4dOUC@C)P%a2K`>6T8o$bHf6+(fSj3{(B{_6k_sP z;Hq?K|KRY+ztU^fg*??mT0hsgxH;&$r~z`co^1WX8g&1i893FewZF`KhjLcvr}Z5j zf9ySf^f0Y&0yyMpefK=BWo5ozaRI0G-GdJAWYYRB)cWZEbv#7tE!71Xj~8YFT$Fx0A)nl|QZ#R$)+ZXs|8mAzm)B1dbo8G6-!)^!R^a{9N8B$ zqQ*6DpXQSEpX&RMgU0XX_UVCBegB}>%^ci55A>VB+dIEN8n5q8#NP^h;LHBcslJPR zw_`um%P+cUUi??Rbb`O?+ZJDks+T6T=K*iu7srFNM7Z?5Fy3@x-~Ky#8n*Zw7Dqq$SCPS^aU~xZDQ3^VuPb==t5i_{VIzm*B3&)z^#ZEt2UcA88{rZ2N0bBd zbbhe&fXrWsD{vcd7q)v(j9S9$5nYd^^Ums~1+(6ZF632Lk?*kYsH*gNI!`2UEpS>d z_B@tnBCi*;pX?jIZ0_AKwjMJ>p6t_k;HVP@h_3^@ z-)|ba(75ICGEjTi?sYu=8@xLbH6tn4%e8N2H z1JSm)9;LkAAoh#v5Sh3xp@+N$TY-z~Q8xCs;H&D%e4y)5`ps{zM~VKho{>1+hqvHO zxrJdip)Ii9i1I)m^^5D~`YGYI0366Cx<54oyl>G*JM^#UKQ;I!@G?qCf7X0By-aKfz83G(_hD;;+|Bn(M8=s( zv)l^(D)7i2C-}vmPJEcdl%4NACH*447yKMEOX_nPg83reF2rARUB+e5Z%gxw@5PCq zzzx_>c^tMaf3DoXg?)5=&icLd+YJ6RZN2Gv{^RxkT)zxMj|k{*fK~hHvBF+bU1~q`D$-8V8x+RX8;ML8Ml;AaJrz4f%{F?cQbj!_symk6>r(LtXmazkIPQ z{EJMyDdR%#Ei2;Kx}Dpf1f0JAv7^SF4diRUKi~;-r2Plen{;9AMlVtD(NBBqY?IQbP&OW_L^MM!_O8e3w ze|P%kA^tQE`U$?$zD)4jUzl4?X`iU~O8bODVRstjbhl;P60sGysP|U(x8NHTe#SSJ za#Ejv{=FpEJ@kCz{WTqn@#h;|&`0+tT)HhO7RN?NR+I zQTFx5NQP^HQy#riCC!ThF5;Gm`>g1@cLwk$Z9TUz+914m`xAV+|1aeud7a!0{`0N} ztugwyT=74_*Wr6wrrPp8eLMIaw_dxV)@J8>FCt!3Wq!KAFS7NGmewsKCG;!rSI7YW z&9M3|T1OFI^t-aZ1SaaC198^=DdS0F(S*M#j|E@ULksqczePVedq}&fAJ&Xqvm#t8 zP>H94PyH}t@rhxqo<(}{%6dfKjjZrahjskBkv_;%o;2;f{QEG>Q=)yfPufj+a(e#b zg5eC;0Vn$^wmnoi0=PepG4#DxH`+0R|GGhbXJqzyE=ChB`-keE1^nsVw!Vte1#j`jDgFtMW&cq7-;Aka z2=nV9-1t{;{Ccz>nZUohN%5y~Jb!KFnqi4=<&z;#{nPgMlE=dto(i1$Uv(n9Km>4+ z$I5uR!S7VF;E70oKk@t%{cQp6!#47keHpv&C{o`sIG=i5IJ}hSQ?kOIn)ZCxxxI;Z zWIV{;Cp%+zaeI~hnFRjxo~M_GvNr*E3bwu#o69kKqukg}`I~&ErIX($Mc*%`_>x^U z8?5>~%pm)L{uS}@L7)1r^ke*~?YCn5aTGs+doyJ|keTMvn4xCQ&kzacFyU5jIQ zGH{A#!IryBIe-g$mGvbR{D=~}PUlP@&*WC{vyBJvyA}+O%cTn*4}!1E$4u}Wysp_L zcYJofvcBl<%eXYV|M`qO>R^80enrJRFDwmw9}VLu5%M%|B;#*BZpFOezCR#GhH(8de8cK73GhNN?<;X$+|xga$e}`+0MO#@|W|K^P}d0^wU({;t}_?aQj3Z zwMGT6+YR6go#K0SR{X6~@W}5dYMgETen;Dx9)EvjeMiv!Shh$07wO!&H=SP~6@sty zBOUsBS2oNLZ7cn7D*8+PQ2H%&iti4R{bV=gZ5zYF-C-KpvdF7Me0PxSOoW~V6JG8N zVQ04WhzYQ^5cC zlO7A``XEUOzVbNN4SubKWfzKTXWail-r~EYv_BJkp;P3o?h*1{!K1h;j}e5N$Xg@i z#NVPFb^YM+LC3!m_aB#5mT}gZYUvP)mt@O)N>cQjQ(?bhhHRhgH~n?=L$crBUbNCa z)!)+p7S9)Npz{UPp5QC((}I7b%I*`?-^3UFqO?z7VjOs3rwQ^lYz6M`hwv2kw}`X- zkjyJuKU_)Nb|+jb*s`D8;8PtQx3Jer^3yLLX;K^?^@;y(5?{}%pGv=JeYmYq#Wa3= zqytXt%O8GUvWFiZ8G)01pFZ2$BGmDb4|ZC>|Gw;x_x|hn$h}VXUo!ZwUiCcnU&lwp zPXm8f&e%2o%khy9{1>yXz!Q+IEkEngq?w0fT@sS05il64avA6m0 zks9sO@zIgnJ$Lcrqg2RK|Ln{EtT8{{a093Q?^^!n7=FA#>p`;52mX^SJ9dRS-be3F->&XTuzK9Rj-&zkoWE^&L4pqKC=<>s{I_R@Nk>`eiG z=8>YmhO##icpA2OVwT=y_D1=zpWYr-IJqFwF2@=D zE9z7#_(|aFGG(09hw}d#Wh18C3VxzOeUE0q^O(#4>ceBk%J; z2J!0>>A)$!Iv;LWhF_PU<0+~~nc#2lqxv({bqVG8iGL~M@lHKey0|XE=TQ+qW&Rq$ zZ+^`GX5|0jcq$3}IxAi4LtU4kdKBDlq{>Kj0P?gxOUK`wFXsCU>=!*G;%fORc%EtW zWX~u*&*)!CzbUR`SJv?Ic_uMma9!x%ZO>3%7p#z{Iu_HfV>v$0*n!hHU9?}lgU>Tg z;MDH}*5zInYMwEH=fSpa^+JvRYo4L?Mh5ua-**-NuX%>}+Sf83TNgb0+W#l6{%}6ec)+LleOl33ozF8?_(${1iJ^^8^La+|M*2hj zlegx>(Y$W!fm8n*T(J?nZqqm+`%K_Zt!yh7s%~e%UMqO^6(c@lbvx4AAvmA8obBMM##HP6s_H?ns`!SBw8 z>!nUn4~&?HwExPu45<^*Bhv5|H()=Vm+P_p>DW;7R0ixYgCDPY_Xt&L{0I(L(NkezXa>|g5PDx!=j<)DJ$&Os6Hq*!9VZKwG|)6=P3vB z!2o=AgQ|u3JY~jys#l*)KXii6Q#Rm~zdz*P@gUSZMfJ=9{@5EyN&huZQ9irCkBupE z?Z4(J;%9)rsDF>1|I0k34U=(cQg!jNQ1cYkGd}N#<5DNay$SL(PucJ{=ZkqN1^Y$j ziQ^|#w5$un^Q6o5lEB4rm#=s*PW!z$f04=b3BC#XG~v=8!8fR)Rp|=*sJ(@m4GB z6qv}14A^UdJjtfuZ|<+i3n#VXmlyt<$^`r8*zxu}jyR8%0lpC7$#`S}{UzcUeXlSfxEs-ZL>|FM)y%PqHiQr{Hi&q=00 zj_{qDCwJ)lf{;&B;JwzkuhRJuZeKchNhMXsL)n)JyzbimLEi;U$9s86-mXKI zADR#)zbIu*JwG8#=QEc9gi>Bp9uN;`4bCs`zgLj zz^iw-w1L}C@y(JiJT4cPr}(Bpeuu6@(043Sus!k_Uqa%q-HrUctaKke`O#o<{*SqT@v+ixH}p5# zQ?%_{|NO`2z!T6;qjT$yaQhO0Q~SCi1*&oT=sx-s#4&urh!H%$QWWxUGOn)U_N4)* zJesni(7Kd#qY;2c0cF(}bNi04-# z68!(EkYO4he<_Og3qO3-m)lSAOGF**wV{7X(D+fvyQ@}i&+W?u zPVw8g^s1iQ7oS7=Z=NORxl&v2%;NT?K|TSzvj0xC^7v8w$v^d?3sbm!667fUC&L;g zbN^C+Q~XO8p3{r#r})Pseyw}Bk8=OgAy4tI_VttH+`mlViI6|Me36se7oRh@|6gzW z?qhBr#Xl4A-@g9jFFgK<3i-P$KPbuVO9D>u-{CtP6#o?96#oI&o8{p4B>+#ucGKx| zvv_4l(#nD`Ue6C>sS6siO3+I>rT{+<ZuVt zd+~!&{5hE<;1=NDwJPv$&~q}FXJ|f|cJhUl$0rqXR4-f?x}M|P-+*YATo#qVN|9G$s-b>86demlPI zYpy>lepoMl;VD#}k7py~DSk)3xOs=hv&b(Ca9VFxOZ_ea|K}cWQlIv|Qk%C=@lS$$^twGgdHjtE`L;dGA94FEz$yMa$ISSZ+eh&u z{e^6EpL6}Gkf-^oe)p62xqi2z{m5gpDsufaUnRo+U*-%9I^I(kkp9zr^=#koLwWl; z;51)d3j1R+Z=as0pySO(IWErO$MY7*)A8!8L63sIyOr8b*6n2QhMxE?jvr4M+Dn}D ze{;>ckL!0U^jAE-vL-)YkP6&~?at1F`|;x`^*hpk7uuQeU}eyE#Ep>Cf!C(#@ZmhZ zKE&S$yqfL1raZqa*iZA{#aF%ro?pq3PX=$!hP~(b_|j4T0$)`)=@PHMls}Z;o^?Z_ zdH?w!NBOgOQ2l|t|I`J8^S{M@?+orA# zcC!F)pWfq7`SI;nh1|S ze^RlZ@@Gfv{%?8yxY56E@D5aYQJT-csZ@V~@4uz1%GXEgcm~;chLF>^Meui!-_=*@b!^Jq5tUgg>Jq+a$|l@2G5-|Y6)K-S!jI#d~{g*GePe$ z!1{^SCyRPM2zn2f4{|jB%ap?lDD5Vf5QG9 zg=*yI<5OKk`cL!c?P{-g^7eJW(;+`uz4RP!-v~Sv{V+bE>>s@Stoal2`>t0yR<1({K-Gl^Bh6%8PgS& z@uB)zU}5vKJU&L?!)FfyuXq3e>&;xNUq-q zInuv<#^`Ijep-Oj^_FJ7ci-^m4b5mj8NAqnpUvja^U-tQWM3+H(>7=yQ5^a4st&jt zTmAh>F+88#h({*yj=dd2cz;=d#}}9J_~?siTX;SvU_aI4@6tE4=J}+Cd?I+OxBM`T z&*wgj*CgQM*X0d5-c7-Ns>kJq<<7btQyfnuLp}|>AuH~_;PqSwJRSJwz1H30^*mFd zf7F~819&}mQ@t)B{cqmfUC@8qPT(in_u+Um0r;-#A3UOKM*>g8ezJdIxh;S5_c|m) zJ_)>gFY7$x?{&z;ab^ne(v2^E%HQjdrqEyZ$=RX&y$&gmPX}+*A9020{nO(5oAUg$ za7B`z=W{>C-@m=S)bH+ z{=y7>x8L>s65&r|I{!latot*d-wyr+-7n1}L+DpN=imarh4W&3R0#db=U6hppYe`k zMYLjIiTK!YUZ3s*)oS0y$KUUf>20O|nRvdhey3Th`28wY@ag`V1GiEO^ZTD1@RM-O zqrFqZ3?dqV_+{N!=7b)KckKmv2h)90k}a<@*ojAWem&`9x?f715*133Ak#e05d?D{iDm__2^Ix_X2ZoIq>OZM)*Ql>{Z zc#~Ug0-M@4?&sRT0zQw~c8q4eQrJ(eug0Jrmj+<~z{3+zq zY|;*Te?+(YZ|+2RBw65^(lQ?2e`USj`h3dHNQUbP$9<8`>U(xYF+6oruzq*bq#2Rk zxB9J+*R+y$-hH$2LKMU83jN*c9l99JaJ5B_AF{u~oC&uhGT!Rkzxw@I+tglS%B|qXqrXz>$^Ni|Uv_Mdb+Ml8{0!uW3%sPYG7jH=e_R!p zouBpmc0BI)&466PNxm{UT-o$zJ-=K2OKy8GU*xL?{yM>%I=Nc)JSmdrk6)I5+7&VmUhqC&S~Hg>Iar_I z)AQ*D=v9@K{++(FJ}hric0T!M{Zs1KgYRlN_;EgrOOg`$mHwH*-*0#smp_r1ax47P z!VWulsfl%t764D^Q_epw@V>0*f77usSfAi4=N~WlvpOH`TreTq{F7C`=zbkdIT??= zt#+6S>9Xrr&OZk5zg^HUGCn@Le&zgQ1;2OAf~5+pgY}Dfo8})r62*NpCe(Kay&`$Y@>xWpI^$@On4wh3UNWY(} zs^+8P9idzNgkQ?`#eU(J7k26)Pkx#4x6-d9>=*JPzx4fN|I_#2HoP$(2}Au8xD)j{ z4RWQoeRCq5;pP#+-?j97y{#k1Ga*Oc!~+9Csvx|I_>TALcY?=O^Ge#f1BE)4>0^(NB+anX>cAetK_@5Bzf<4gDmyAv>S! zH^Q#?Dl#trl%f|_g|8fh>voe zkqW+bbonjfJO{6@VxGuQ%oFM03!P#-Y3|7WiATThPiv#)`Jj6ro;N!^%oW^tR&Cv~c{4Bt! z9=E7EM8o12WrTgn;I-R7E``4TDdOk2E8|P`tlLr5A#R@=ax|W6v@P-vZ{G);`qwjW zh=aFp!#GPq|0f)8Q;^43S5?M``loj9t}#LJZ7k~$;n$CUu|C2fGa%6akf-=w>u`BN zB*UqmCWCh*qg=%(hWntO`u}XXSp&I#H{_^)#*ExPEtGyAc%7^Mx|r)%SCjtfnn*v| z+}u?)nzf$_IURV_bw~6u45#&qVYTe1o*8RbggI4#pYWg7D;CI?xb9gW&Tx9a0LkaO z+;lFNPlX&km%8h8&z)S}4V=bTm)=8iMKJw7;M6}+8%J%3WVreR=|9Eyecx}}q8OeG zc^!D`4jeoe&2X}h@_%BVZ!FwC3*>10ZO9+jiQAV9obuza)8XLur2?n^ZNFhxKW?89 zxEtGod+&6PfqjAb3g>H#@WTgQ?FDVWRHGkdZ^?Bt)nghD>gqB+>x;X~)3_nN=wBo9 zBLTeI$J<^BHGUH?-}WBbbtysIDRX{G-dWMBaWXc2Aa`jXl*cs;ds>&3f4_95V@oo@J?O6+BQ`G>!|<9kG~If4b}fNf75v(bxj$U ziAz@Y4AuV@=t}@EK7Q=Gq53}s{lEB3tuP+{WXREau3phRZ+Lx=SFHEzOe?pK_pclB z)W2J&4E>txr~dVU_wnbmKMU$#>{ov%{XEyn*fmuD(){Xc|G^#Jzdl9(w!5_Q1KxiY z=%xOv-MsG?q53ZwyhgLXeG{_(P@hx5`*`T6)uH;2)@#&%Zty#m|GHwR{xbs4#5Tiw z^>5yPM!f%p>g$ze=YJ1J-3W~T1Q|D~uMx9)+xYxs0Z#R`QCdZ6CGS%n zsPGg1x-s5$;0;MRqo%kDT(wEggLHhJqp3~B*K zk2LHje~-UP`ZI@J8YtS=!OwK?>LusRos;32*iZGS=z3LLE{5xn2l2IK9KO*nDo*EL zg?H=`~Re4yjI_&PEUch0RpScYj!@>S3174fZyhlvv9mQJD=ubI=)K*zxw@-wl*Z9c=l59mF&fjn0F175e9$H&tBBf=N)6LD1f zBle5)nP$kT>dAPSaUENazsY~W7w2h>*f0L}+ZmbOFgQ-XHSuI+t?(lme5yy8W>v*7 zt&k4LN2LO%de_aN{xMt|fQA03RJ;e?4c@;Cs>MaT#Ur&9g4;jQ^iEz z%1fbB`~+WVryhJ`nE|^aBrWS-kzYzX1t{$I!Co`u?br%jjMG&1cYv?(*Z54XzXe~k z<5S>bzsTcs=t(XouU}FgXJS8(tH@(bgSYh|kY_Jt9$E0*Xa4j8qa*b~JL(6{3(`E` z`$pPz@ppefe=%J;I0JW``B(fuqL z;0p^xeN?r-%TUnP2fiogwxWSnT7qr1I(M5P=wHF7 ze5CwUeJuU^V)>jg>Ja%$`AGSz2S4-i2i0QDq*-o-e#%E$$C$y_{nSVw2fs-w5TAc# z{OsU8+<#+l4(7iL`>CESeHk@BC&%Hh7rb)YcdBv$_uCV#Q{=msTJYOm{w!yx_mL>`-30#elM5b*_mS|Q(67vQ8~9(`t~)8z`$&}QBq#V|2AzBq z>U|`X@4U{5x~Qc%L7r;2riqLP=Zm_i!+v4E7)LtAI7*o$>y5yLUn%%bfJr6q`_Xrm zb;jMh-|1W#g7x+%_(|Z~asNs(+N(D0YM=bm%!zV8A*6=^*9kB@x2n%6Zf zMgE$=b3%U-_@As_X)o$zrbvme$2>3^{B-aeCcYn8%#oX)K2F%r{gU1y{7riQ(+kCI zx%nyJ^L>p`;JY)LJ}(iSo9|Na?ckfD7F~`o2lA;OFnuBHae=q*+vFo9ErLgQD$cXL z%R;BLDg~VU=kM^OJB6MM@NZQxv@9JJm>==E-Nv(>t%d*EQCGZW{)cvJ0Y3`-B_n@7 zQZ^!RzDD|$?bZ%{!wLCEmeU9FX+Fd4OKykMZtbYIF35AcO~r4SPwm!=^W?EFZrS$> z@;A+TwCIq$%vygE;XXSKQT1lH?Q)T59S(w&5*D7wyiVSCfh^(hDEV1 zaDb2ev%kO1`SZN%?^E|f^TsL=0% zTnf^Yk!ST>_7qpUBChEQ`^=|>eVo7M)SO40KgC5UFYNMt&kTAZ+KD(sAtl@w2X(ac zoBT{KCHi|FpBH=+)Ky-WIqQqK@_STYRd`cGzF*i4eZ0?8BRILae7~>Uf|p>6g*+*!uS7D{kGvg8YkP`Uij5z=-FQX)B6(nz1>Fe%j+*E>U{kImodeI z^m9ML{Alpsn>p#r|I7Olo#5~Ix!^~6y)Q9AG43XVPx+Jo{JuoaKPxt7M3Aq4VO-Tg z_{;H2AH4dQ{JunvKVP@%d^B~9{JumpHULRNAS;*ByDWqDP!@R#LxwCQ%4<*EKgLEZ=+uQw{JDPLZf zd)^R|0DHZ#%M3Z|;1@@*W&4f>e^98W zV0iBSGJD>Y-5;<$8}BwZ_6b(O!9-gLIQZa?;cy`>{D*9f-S~X-lsH%ig+bK?p5(m&uI}) znXjC0r-MIo{*douG@oiuoJNx8?#bA8X4GE=LS^0xx#da-pxlN&k-Pe=ao;2r3`Xg-gRpx;fj2hj1 zVE>o_eftd?*ka^Id4xel_9q94an=nx``7P$>y#?_FH%DGdlmMZOdq{3a`59iCvep# z!q1`O3dX5HAp32=jld6u1aIS55^lzM9_PM~DYKI2Uw(Puu2G_XoZnUG8DH=A%R|2t zylwY?a|NSb5N?STa;*QW)-xLN{EF~|LdKmU)cRdBjHAz=l4*T8TMB_ULTWwn@7ao4BkhV^qX~(JioV!^=~;@GgH>@ROo-% zq)EW~-3Hu^G`;ftslk$dH~jJdPyKFE>k#0yUQ0*4=KARcukW5Jm-L9U3WqOmroSE`-;=FORh~vdDb*21J zK>e(;e!KG5ob~V6-L00aKVG4~@F~;79R0qyED`ep-f!=# zzfp^QBKuPyAN@>}hqcqhfcI~6{^{VY?^R|2w!!@V+m{CFZ$G_jbySdPmcPa9J*tp$gIsX*k z+%MD^F!VOpXR7xp--`Hi{L;ZMSG+(y9$Vm!KOWJ|L>#lg>$5!eyzGyuzlaCF-{!B; z?`;V12Xc(h+8NSTj(2J?%=4h<)R77S?-#Nc4bRa1@n1Qf8IUugyt=PyK+v{I7P;dMd{|74jzV4&O+7KfwPYB7gS(Mu&gr z@YqZB!2&ru(yASHI=P+uap+F~zG~55kp(3C;<>zm&tG>wir=T>^Yasj(ZK1qKP&U1U;6msHHehD|?JGH!Ce>3FF9^S_#{TYzwalGx$ z;ZK7jRsO@DKi;3EA1wSIKW*%(5D7QoJikBiQ+I(xeGVRGPZ9l%1-$5&ee#Fq;JT#! z0=EOtO6y|`lktZl{w&|9Wvg1UJp0G(>+t=Fd%2#F{i)E){vDe{uwIx#&*{pCzaFDsc7nI4V^BzZ+~Lw&<_9z489y{6kM)sLg~5JRbVE{@nd0eT&BIhyCM+Jxr{l zUEp1NW6UZ7Tl>#Y@l@^;ejgnIa|q%I{%X!0%D8SYvJ{ER~l%@!-GNoRrA@yv$eHlLWqQ z%Y%dh24?=ZJ?Y?&yVr`+zt<1XsSp10$MfP`{^c9Q#>?ez1)t;p&ZigO z;`saIwcaQ(9&r2W7+U^7PX50AZ^-lh^+xrM&OtW8p!`#S^Zt1FlRI_Q5}pp6>))BR z@AlM4couN(Pb*iRaa=3m5hH}ZJYH+}xsr4e9tE81@3;e5qh*EJ2+eUyn>$t0O|BX^m6@)a0vgoeCN47t*fyK3n>3c^m|d@-Klb+lUzTtV3!qm-22UckjvMBa^w2- z*^ox{)y^FKF355Gn{0M8(nvVRKLxz@FUHl*EB?_HMEuji`}n6(O@s4@zp_8c0zdq5 zNH?}ySSR}L1cQjLX{3l#zu3g?Tu%P_*H^43xqf{-UK6V}3k`Dp)iYjo{sil2Od&l%#i{To`CaQ-{;4!i!3PNDd=yKz+366 zJ0@JhypR6;>e~<#MJ4ATKEJ0f8vJPRe>zdBv7Rq>K!o`G z`~$yt&Ix|IsRcTQ@`4n6DjzfEY5d-~WbldN^G9v?Mfe#GnW3AC7nwe>avb9h;Qa37 z&Am#rJXPe&1B|Bu=QYUs=dbhiKihCJaGl|V(9h*P?CU|tp}R1)SrVhTli7)VQEm#FN?q$1@1= z5`Jn_UXE+L@Fx-};nWT+(rNk|z8Z|HW@LWILSTr#%q!iLaWTZoqbsyc@XfoRD8QcAE5E5{=5K zh=WIwKaZ=N|G_?qE#>@G<5546f4Q9lmU8|S2c>?FgBST2A#X;?aj;6i{eDyw>+xul zNbd*Td(Lf=%G0axBS9gbTs2UB*S>#Ol`TGxyyKBw=h=(=8li0qFqP;ZVJn(Ezd+_c50q5@zd@yUGm-kmlp1(g}0dMAS zDZ^y@^b>{u{QUt#v$Ude{wCn;=VvX?{Uqn_z9{VC_!s^B{uw#`cF3y`zfBwR1$Vp5NC$y>&>4yl<2MdHrW1 z4%OE*cpC7164V`7{zsyIrwv%WSFRs+$a%q=yt>Sva{T#vU6M)Y z`D1>c`ttRWB*=RziFUBP&ceP@{ZuD?DfSaeKKk$m)#9?cTo2%C6Yx89!gq9Dc&Fc@nL+*#(l}-To{auH zqmJ;SQO}}b5D$I0>~=nAAUp+fN#KQzef_T- zFMA~+pAO!zAAUM7#Y>lk^E}TAntgXcK`H-uTn~x(T*PI}>y%%@B|Hk}UC`tDdhtnv zglE+aw7){#J7(EGE9B#muIm#NT1b+2;XKdRw6+Cz3QKtWyMg*wO=ww7j!!z|_4Ner zsrym^IXe+m7?R zzBzS0*P-$7o;al8Mr z%IvP;i++B}xay0*c5iq&Ls$7=_bizn3l ztU~Xfwh)){w?Urs-?3+G{}LDGqh z?aNlM?xxFoV(OF46hHIS!1#T-^GWp7){p(wm2ewyj$faZZ!PP#CMN@$VMZ>xr^` z`0UM&ziOKB%UwFNLAY5cCp;48lcDcRckf*W;1qu^{7GLd@{0z4-n98Q3!%Ri+Whtf zd%)-R*^Q=Vh|F83`RPg_6o|SGC<0RW%Eo9j1vEIQ6r9 zy^rUCmajw{8*Dt>Fw87?{FnI3d7vHq36+-a;dw9fDSt2aPxyM0F1|@W4fM+SyPzi( z>HMFsF5!7H>y!B=@G_8I=+n4g0V6X-D)ZwJr-)g?KaZ-5m!7AP590Ivm)uWTz_0ZB z#|hyw+4q0)&sj>uH6FZ6w~C)&wS*g|i*+gM>ohC*Gjx%D`BcbdV*PpPW#3BvP80ew zfOGjK4g92mT)u9F{+^e%{3Gi(%@+Q${`)+R9%(K`mk~hs2abW$!TSY9D_3MFKkcRGAc}m`&V*Q-I>cxuca{dVl`K~i8J!Sdm zYGU4y1m3LQzbYy3Z>8cq*YEOO8g3|R6agUn?Z7jTK69)~FDBs`h?_o9_*rmh1$A)= zH{pC#RT0OT-5WYfNVo-fL`{Len-H}#Lc;C9y}&<@ocpAtgeL&!_5G0x!#^*TgJ-Wp zL(u4MUS4pnT!CLls(gpfzwC8lDDW+t8vhuaye5)xs{a|#&+|<4JTaepH2A_fgOOM{ z2k}$E=Xs|7YY~?wEzYgWYaPMsxG3o}h0=YxNzhkj9TkL!nD$ZEg6kmq%e2kWCMrx#Dl%ibjLGmvUKuhq-z9w+9_;mGf& z-i7wts}E^H`BA)iT~Y}6p}7lVzFHQ}>!R#+VG-a_uYM?Z_a|*Hwl{vBh$pWT(y*Rr zwY=Hoyw(X;@VWe4`0W_U2zQ4RqumI z@IKN45eIA27G?RJQG_R8pUMJ!lRA8`5g8C}0d5EGZC9>UdEj)NNqPN;Ai6G;gnjn} z$R!~qoUS{1q~E@LvY%V8Oa$Lie`2-Too1h1ME@r{Qt`a4=Qpv>upxH6R&69ytd}#P zkDtpmEEN7OYP_`zJ+H`pHuIIwU;@+X<|1MfiTP1khbkv?U-o#5Ttz2*`< z2dId5uIF^!;8*(Qfj%TKd;j|pl<_7CJwKKRyV4+^ozG(7KgXB&zIqlEf%Ej6{Nnq6 z?fXSM%B)f28~MHynRzryj-qy%j1{?~s$f zZ=VhFMm&f3aG9xekWDZse;07Rzwbts%nE7=PXW&Bjg>QpzNeA!bl}_%j4eE`qMkC*Oee`lEEWE7KM+=ESwGo-E99fV3tM%1vR;zs`+HreN4L1(R?T`L-gNzam{T!dQuV{XTO(yq8+)A1x?% zw$ECz)+cIbPW~y-%jK8y!{GKB8Ati0gIB3unN@j}AIC2Xy!W;~zK~b>Df^>{6(T;( zrnUMfukv$2p9Q>!Pk&!4mmk+(zW;Z2?E~ck?*D}x_YbrGxqL|Nko*VE@zZ3~eyovj zZa?YZt&VxLKj8jfoagqPf9tLqvV0csh?T<6^AC?^%J=^&$CoJZQj7;u#Nr^{a%xi+>yu8*u+G&U1a-w`WfOe6l>3H+VO17T%g)!c)*5?7*wX z_AXIC!V_?w>+|2iD+(5ra2M)x5_pRrI9G;CxD|LR@S00U7Bv9(^;f~l^2z{jRA}>& zh0yL)IEb&T?|Qe0%dgio`3swwDN^Dq`?o0Y+rFG#Kd<|LmG;=d??3%)N8Y#KT=KHV z1^$zs`RDVxRpu-0Nd>>-wO+G|GZ87RKa}$Uf@q!)fpIPi@}|`y4ut#f|CN6G?9Beo z1HZ4xZ)Mv+7#-py3;f!VHjUEq^*YG<4QqwJ?BDvsBci5VkM!UELHZ+svwwfQ{Pfr# zAJ+8GZTf*iTR{f z@g1ar{4uT*@nC<;)YVVf+NRKY#?8Rl-;B0tKi|pM{{nEe4R{ke;XAaa7wR7#{G}uP z-=|+~a)^Ch&i~McGyg2QcGnF&$gRl#-jz_3x#6zt`s7jMU*l}I=ZRNF`nP6CzZZBj zQs_IZZ!fK?J5{D8{XfX}zJn6G=JicJae`<(~okW&Nl1Ie)4jstv*qBl_u*`F}~Get{0cosctv=lr%) zD}Q4I&hHU41Al*8#RPdC?42Uo8PDUM-E3MX$VS?Q{*0%A_@+H4qh#C-y}XXmo6gNu z+x+6fKHwgtCqGFISO?lz9_f~G-+agOGx9IKfM{R*p1{Gw-Qlu+W0Hsu>pyqnXnu{9 zzv*XTKg-+NmU$)1n;~yQnm%sU1bN=3!g(jscV>T4NuC$Fah~TzOG96k;CUVO7b=tw zzo*Uv{vK2P&Urk?9PC7U;P0Y&!LNF?XQw=_(+2bRO)U8CwPB-($F$J9os`#U$sYc` zi5K^yo56qdV0~16qbN82>#u*X#{r(R`-hGK;Q8?E{$o0XcC`Gv-k$oaThmXH=l5K4 z{a6@#^IDKukb`{fyNLL&ic`L(G-`C;(Z1H*chsmc!yQuFB09Bi)uzDq9fjWwf;udL zN`L;`zAeDZjvRH1+ZW|u3}jCEp6gKqhxZ*ZI;KB0?ok6rju|+j|3KDD`8yT)r{MQD z?~e5MUBo5-Isa7P7t(@fbN+;Tah}`vtd;LolH0e9^Vux?Z8~jmVYz*KQ7%T{gQu?9 zr!xynNxvEAd0p@@Uq+W;3Fr33^{v?y?Z0XX=l39S`Mo=K$N(-s((hL2Z{2&|5n0{| z+=KK{8T%%Uq@UX-=YPW8q`xfhg`8@O@IUGGAiY+Sw*fZ-Z}8~e`j8wvd%oho;Z3Dd zrTlWN#sE{JZNC5d$8#Ix*gt+gVeXkik?bdN>F~!Bd?(WQUm7Lp&3@Rg&x7*d_L$6e zwXD*PuTKlM$lrwbcSgT2#@RIRH$SO#BFxB4k^18e{i>}Z9_`OKVhe&tIJYZ7SAy4(4=VhGoRJ!kgSO+yYN9-v7P$uV0_1%H|=sb<5N%-A=ReHdC7`eWu0B>Ha z#|^IUlz&Mm<}?Do;|BH}zemKqL<3i1s3pE~-D(2A;ie&7 zsqS-JNrcvexz<&_^Rym}M7~zYn`1<|B;dEKhw7&r=SeU5rMe{es#T&s{Ib5|A1p(- zEgbV3$PIh%{1vXJKHjtZq{w%0nos;x^&c2FI%ZHzf8QvHGyeRt-yde&A>z~V=oeEX zE2sG{F;IT|9ZR-n)9ibdWqTZu<9bt~+T|*|ZY6nsZ%iV1%YVv$g7*ywPsVxMbFuCj z)Vf)JEy{;*zV4I;UU--M<#ZCRZ!GL)`_4b<@Laafuv6e{U(D{Fi}JEB61-L3cOqr` zqH$jTLfCh)bhCH!vd;nDqLTGn%J%VhJlX&6zub3G)}IVH&OcwdyEF3Ap9bEnhD(OZ z`ZICfuvXNU8b6QO9xTNtk@0Uu94bZEuNWfXnTTs7@U(Z1ch>`_b`cHSi~1G~p5>QM zriW(NB=H}Ad4cZ$?|8HNqx?6|`zUgGx`CHAR{VnNDB*a3_j~$^~vo4Ir@F}6%A~EKbX$8 z;PyxMJ0Z{hFWENlh~&RE@!dfCepA=-udOM9B=3g22kG&MGvCSfIS^mQZ;st4Zl;Dj zw>Q;y!td^LRgv;IWyE=IZ!xcz8RYnKe9YiAj;q^RN5=UMvd@6}#Q85fxAJe~|%SeX8BUZ_a<@o9jFB z(r*Os*0z>wWc_BG=l1mM)YB5d!hOI0UgT>7ugB+24uwd#jqL{h^Xj_I^%93-w69w*4+I@&ff_+j^B=Te?6Dtr&WG0_sOx+hY=osd_9oo{(RB& zzYYaS@$&-b`d8{DJ3>JJnI@KXhL1pMYzJx1A~X zPd4DH?}h)HzAE3+KbZTRr1EoOUcvoqlN0p^$nC?nT8txXf6v(bGv)eWhF%*|SBs&g z1Ii!gGrtjf4)uthCzZd>2;7bIP=_YX3ZejLUKOG2zx{Um?r-3J5prInB8Ac<_0i zvHAP5F167Q`{lV`bb(i?e7?~d2~WX!8{Yf*GWF=-5a8sG^1XxU;9t3Uvp$d4A~&&4 zRQjI<{=#Q3W4OLC-+z5W;Xh$CpS42H^n-{8&u6XpEyvQo?!$SK_r*bo zC1c^<&4c_VP+Ymc&)6o$)xv$;5%P8YH0X=CC+1(}r#zY!98KE&eug9ikAi$Ae%JWu z^C}@`KP~$Y#Zmb^E5nb%uQksf`d+yoIL{}(@_SZh@aN1Fe2V+D37(y5w6mR2C!e5S4 zq3$K;hajGWn}PFn`01m+OXd5k2)6;}{f~_WLK^VCB;iiryw1Fm@Xm%XNxvI7x1*QS zH-48-!acyb9ql+BYtNs92l4mVOn9z;Qn5Q{mXw>c68;6L_6h&^deNLI9j})^kujWc zBXGW6R44J#*jcrQeE?i-2CjP=y@q1{M~yGl>zh>dcfmgYf^5L~`boc5t;-z0vw^RF z1UZ58^^*}(vW9diYb?+D-N5b-^ajp{QW<^Po)0EmX|dSLPh=bK%VR0 zMDwq^^1NKk)f@$Tv|H9Oe0< z+I*tW_`vtsasSBklA*WvSLgjW)|VIG1HJcySB>TUHRh9@I{e_2=XRgQ3>e5f*-qm@ z;r|jt+;7WX-)u)5(!*;8PI(SDqHkPWEUt*kdhF1XeBtDiW|=L{vmTynaLRMxm=XPl zjqzQNWt%9K^(8~!-Gmiuk8j#ujc_?0#y+C`IR6pj-NP3%wkYF4d<)(q!~Kcsknp#} zt{Fu&XcwfL4qyH{*JGiN`=`jMo2IEHoaMNDn|=QAI$7QgdG0@+ z4|t~o%Ln*(K+JbM;D^QLE32^yJNU2cALr`@|Iw~+C-<8YKl?ip%r_hs@mSZqjgI?K z=2JYJ&}Rm3Wc~z~+#hnh9QZ!S@(NEM1v!NVl23#j_s2=;;jPsY&Tyngy(52<&OvW+^-mqig;X^9CtU&%*-79yspSZKNJoAubKug^SFK-qP%|W z1po5Ofvc6*kI5c4^yY22zl=;-}dlmC% zL#ptXlv4Te{R=Aoj`sWodxH{1mW12D=k_z=N^D`Zggb%r_`iAX=1v;mK3lT)s(4M! zyY|Iqn^M*!Dl9u)lp=X0`U<21ER=pZ}O%8PZE{+RHuW~EAL zJkRmPEjR;u4bWo(?@Z0vyLHebw265L_oEya3;26#UVIu1|73nD?gMcnpLp=U`?y%C zkUaSOd^NYTB=Gwl=vhMVWX&Qa`<3k|9sC9@&C^32x%tX=q(3g=5~H2iG0c{muWUzA z;Lna(GMCpYEJgNM6z#|ke)zZ#wE4}<6e;nQ?Z^fGfN=x+7KqHvSGJ>6@V9pS*1^|v zS&H;4+ff$yHR{jW9c~D07sOY#BhxP;KGmD=2=UPa+7ZpGlM#Fo6+XK{(!h5O5&Z!_|MRPTS}$LF3OM}px>kb6 zSf-R8`N{Q|_1Qla{3_P-=U9f7lAkJtKEh~U#CSr)$BfiEQ|NKvx2%iyMG|nHOz5f0v!_8)UzKXmz43?<*0P4&tXmKR@S}f#1J8x;~Ds zH*tT%d}Vn@oD}|aIBgzGb4J;IimOo(2MhS5&*zWU)=>DL9w*WXgHLZEj1KCLT;TIK zUt)2GVm#laa$$dyaepNH`|g}}HMW?rFkAkcxo$ge+BpR8zxo^m58)SJ4@C2k$ZI<;2 z$RFpEkZwFS;#Z!p`SZtlUZ)<78@it7XN0HB5_V^R*Kt(Ibv!SlcjSr?>_A)$@@PnKzzQBjPJv-f?wc%m6f4pW{Q;f+<#dz z#J+F>_}1;8?FmD85zS69|{60j=kJ~r*XD;xE){1yH+^7mT z{PrpOvlQ^#cNtQJ?%z=KXSv3&4DhEet1_XGPrKZoQNOP2&&UAk*W20z{{>dmI-{|*l(Vc$Wx2e<`z{uYx~@EV+O z>pj#f@Lq<$6UJ+5!g)VkbxzoS^}#RM`~8Hc+!yl6cyH>|qyH@DIjF4P4Eb{j?NT`g zvVI%zW;bpRrSXCe!ksuDVHN#nkJ^cybOQF{M&NFw+b?KK%GbA2;GYNhA7Mj3%(?!p zQN=69Auo8Gzy6`{kLAb3M0j)Lef!_%MO-Z4bvFK6Ilp9IG}f^y=v}|=!z|vrApdNT zcLU#W?nooqemA~z$>ke6>cLLAd|AI6dg`vZeN8Uk1boMmF;4OhRG>t{UtF$3>g`>W0uOk15`IUl$C3z2U)vv<8 zrX!9&2$OIl&U5*PFZriZKH&a-7wa}IcQg2<<~6*M$8+kr>Whu_-yirXmy-$y#U~Tx zmH=jRIUx8?X5 zfv2w&^)3I)&=*qqYLh}l{Ru*z$(uhog#Y^UH$&cr^myozD7pQ4VYd@__hn_4`Gzb1 zLH3#9pBs1ubG__)Y-wCl_HQKUU)OM4Am>F&IIXL)q~F9(RrHh5eMNl}`e^gu!aGbcZk`BT0$zM3GH!1}RnO2Tip zf%r7OdT^e8lU@A26JEcq{QdS@EJJ>0DEwCaCj4M|ejf?T_iS-_Y>vEd9aAl^{QvrV z|DPmF2jy>rK5jq8p5EVrP{7oF_qzqL;JsCtkkTV9s{oaeVGmk*iLzV@tF)!Q;O^e)fEv;}da3_&dB@|1~=3 zWj>X6)Lrphp#{8uM?ZKFjEi4{$KyPgce6kKtra5ULxq0cZ&})<;5?04r#O8b)^m)KT)Zr_}Ni^+5RITS&xHY7sWpv@>xh9G(XZzBjFL(L|k~@azFgb^I8dy z0?y^rF|E}GorGI~bHAs0)#gR8gxipBJb2|dH+F>pr~1b4?@B?rxxn+Lw29WkPZ14K z4leLgz}ppGYka5_4{i@xKZv-;_KIo8?SbOK`^c_|0$*2d$6mElCZ6c%MeLhwFs}ydznQL$vXNLHTj{ars14sJM>n4dGmVyr1+ka@Fu4N!|s$DM+`3 zmOi7A@N}H#_O*P;rWV9n zA9xhsEQNhDM*p}nKXA%VIo?EE7xB23nWipa3CvIShsT>J@Lw#yqbnGdo39*i?BE}& zes5H`DK}p^-nhUY9DKW`AtEF*6f4k4JkZMK%VCf zrawhIWIoLs%s5X(El z*Aw7BaBhdElkdLG>px$;&Az|H44&$yh(p1vO*xH<;3d6xbc5`_8TZ|=|1GC#hs*gp75e}D zIqs$Gzm4rfx_to2fBVg;ro6u**MB$HgA5UmY3aQV zhN7K|+9K8!x#~aoFFQT2!~0asC;OaS|G>L{a&jr2vlDJa{dWRCUTx=ac|R)|_Z4ve zQSFbfvfnr3ufLGv_J6##b67z82cF&kMI3J-_ka97Gu0j8cY$K(RC52v-)%Dj|7gg! z#kigO?QbjUH{)qPTk6QT4RQ{Aw{1bz_haSu?*z`zMYsK+kCEd@`uV$UD)3ep*Ssa$ z=fQdY?oEjg5}wHUdx5i`gC>`=AqpG8t;m@c+pPZ+U^W*OxDGu|KL{&{$<%dh1481D)HqoLjDccjb!y2vL|CP%*pglpK8)>H=Jud~6H`){D7cuAZExEp@ z78CU~6Y`~Q6syDe_~V6gX88vRFEnf~;gR

%%u=W9P}`Z2%sPbYytuCdodn3*SZK z^>-9T`upm zr-9`;`^?H>a{iGI0{z$Ae&<6ue*^GnqzjF&_Q>@;4RLocUcS->xjrSbJibS=;9RN6 zeBYNZK3dN!u|9L5UmWYbSz4|iX^`jmU92;AkZgaZLVuA7DMpP^XrTBT9tQf?d-j=B zdAy4R&hwR*#YZ2L$Gc?K51#KmBg+avKh<{wzN@FgywU;QTb~TSo5yz~a+Pp z>;dw4?{F4)eLMVSknMLuKg(|!GSDK&FXC?zpD3iK7v`%dk25LIYXyEKEPp+DoUsCr z2i_&0_n9x3Zx-aD;9tn1L$BrXi`W$C z-_1>xm$9wnU(`P$KI~uH*-O8c{L@7Mw<7I3wBULvEI%1SrKkw9O>Dg&Yq^{ ziRd6a73X<8*srQn)c~BnBN2suJ|1Zl{LO&eny`lL3K;|U#pF10Kdyf&;&A0vWGH{% z#BYS}PhS1F8T`%1f=xx3h}0i9jMEPAJPp48f!`5ExC;He8+hWD_EY%YSK7Bz?yr$* z+IMqe-^&9zFH*w&*MFto{(U;ddnWk(9YUY)I;P@1GY21sPLSJ!7gBtSk1X{U9!>PYQX>s8o4_f)ULLK^i0 zav4bb9JqLq+oL~@3VD+CUw;N)pC$Z@#PvH9esc_n@8AE#dHU_Im&3$*gX^{RSg}vl zWlpNnUHKFXF=2Rp0zpezSa?$OAdP4pi;LfNMe0KDQS*Uw3Ua zc!yTLPNaGk*sjl2I=Nkwvk#tq-PH&lUw18ktRBpaCK!LQJ{&ybqp?_vNO6-{|d~GxQO;+Iz0& zLsZX2e0KFZJs{NALCfV$?Iu}qoi-ADvV_XdQzo$d4Bdhk%H`(---!9h`IH{3rR#L+ zMBI=3He73QX61=WqfhLBex2pH(9hS2rVj7-M1FqE3;kUG20YGup>_ymR6qH;nCgY_ zbJNM9^Z9xfm5+z*1J2ipix-|*o9{n{Y5x9?uWOhe3A@aYo8NejO=n|fPX2D_cYxP; zsk)qeozRW*Jg(GeU11#oPrgMm}|@O|5f;CaB)r*Ezu;uU`IU*hw9+X>$YyJo&}trPkP?19&AHfpthJWecwLf#{r~DG0h4Vaa96UAcuL2St@g}g| z7mJQ_6_oHO;9T#&f47D+T*9rux!xz-)I}SB`|4Hp^?fhecRctr*NoUwC`pt9|0O=x z^9aP-1^&;I-kng`#Y~YBpX+(z3Q-SJ!QXNH_{|~-x%phrjo@d2KlEmcB}LfJJvqE)KlEgFp|W)I~1>l6I6g4gvIou@c>geT&;CcYj&`Ci+68k^8VINvAE z_3_cYCYOTHo(NBcUXFM1<&Wm6B|HN-*O$(98lTfhIM-u+knqDWer;PVaOwv*o{<=j zOyE8G^txH+7IyMq;`8$p`dHDgTEJgX{z0+eL}rSV?B{+U9=x&YS+7D+u7q=Y<#BFl zUCTi=%7t)luiT!?et3CWkR+c0y$;;3eXwi$FXi^03S6%i{*Qdr_OM2hH{m>w1KUd$ z_(Ut=7T{cdQ_g;3*Gae?ILH6}gN1JeOL!9UPXKSp)zJs_GLG}y-e&JBwlh@1Q-O2& z&-%yyT^Mj`4}3pO66!$)_&?u^nw~F@_Q2)M?Ln^*aXCMx_m=$ef#v7dkN3=`Jizrv z@Y_GOJt>e!dq{vCcJNL-t?+FLsXg$#B8n>r3{yp4t`n@2~dU;QpWL zA3v{>JW8zN4WmUGJz(5ztuxSmsz2$lBMa&MIpZhm5Er@raetjwB6OevUd|rNygeT!Vmw)w5$7*RMJQX;{EAdjPwX*#g zz`6c)y|iU;uq1B+uGa}W`_(w~SBQ+`JlC(gd}to^h0DkK zP}CPY_)CA9wL8q7yL?>G>jKZDne2@KkIE-iVc&x(+5shjlYM+Y53ge~z(2ieb8IPV zV1BYcypGWai?|rtNBmUUlAF)-US7vUfgfSas8}W{H($Aqv4j8QO_%7hrrdnxI>rV5 z)mp3el#2*lmyrF+=QUHoZ`Nyhzqj;(e41zRI!0dK(E8Vg`FR%Pc@NGMBH|(Q{p(+x zCl6?Sq-rhNFY`QeM0pEbt#ji&@o9_1`FT5fR?-;>_0RKk3Fm~o8+yAIDtsu|=!bp! zef>Vpn_WV_x3*pH5DDk^f3yB8A7=S3y64Dy*kMTILNH>AAbKK z$Nj==)w8~83HJhL`(|zHRzxG=2B*-^{hG1b^QA#HmH#09#!wL#o+qvuTIGxyxUZh& z+&=^!zn`YXjR{|A!1F8f{gL^s&jz`^Q!`p=(Z4gF@@Mw!GmUwqK= zqH2fGAm`^**tg(hp_9DM<@{tm>r;gZ|BHpLJ*u@aQ>0{{wW65cM1oiA<%{XO&Ly1d zH{;E%Q_9G=4RTJTDbxE^3`RaAZ>kiiKT}<^p)Bu)oCj&Ld3d`JN#2P1!~V3N@p*o^ zd{y}Z%lF`*Dl@ozDSt2Y8o@h1d`Q4|+{`%7^*iS3nSVp2{0);u{o?X_-R6!}Eg#T{v8dd7ii_1+eFB@_PfEqpFaM*0%kahMCK>sed}r9XZ1EL=ly$@B0fLQ$Nhz>fbef#{jnXxjm#7& z#YcsGt4Q!#9hp?u03PAS>4E)M>Y_qRsf6U+? zG+wyQ_i-?v?6tuT2Y5ei=rOF2Q7{O1WBhUhcOPASy0C^Xx%NJ%Mjz-u@p<0M`Xj;rr)@)(HV^&$9vjwg13#(3 zmp|z8(4Vqe?? zhQfjU!Trb@De`k_{JjP4FXprhdWZWns&5>RXy{?P7pxBNqqfM_iur9Mcn+jtahoP+ z!1LFCoag?r(|5IQX(gQP<^Jy-N3Fl5>j&B2hhSWF@yT}XA7y)0MTFmM@0a^pE#~zt zTTS+OVUH2~_U$j1(bxrp@MxUp{`TPWv`6xDL;PN3-f!|&ALje0MUH$TJcM#9rLf4mp@^#>_$g#f4es(deUCiwr3Px@S+DD2?BK7Z7nbWvYw z<79Hay|X_!GQJD_Bz;b=z-_n=!PgPKTJb?ktrtQ_{P|xC_bT`6slKRqJ%;Df zjKzfg+sl4cEuTA={lVU|!XDm-j|Ttmb!GDB&mC`_1LffaZ+xeGzZ7r@y_7%u7wr|# z10;i2_0wI}f(g0vSNfL*zRUDpPSA6U&3_bWg#mw zMM~|%gZ5(sFR59pwS~bWeaiki5xghWwdIST-LqDI{)+xO8T{iV*K{fxm8-wb?w`27 z_JaSYX_=eFOsrX?q+i)z8%l_H{PkYZO2s2`>sR*IX7ImvG)*s|57h6!zN6S5AO?+} zndrA2kk>%ejo-@gGX>{~M&p1PMdrJzxw2gr||N zS*Gf5S-)4If8KpdDOtYq8{{y#K=bKk0wGzpUR3Ikx|Y9WkHD`i;PC zNb7ZbyjImkGX)>aV}q-zEP|)We}?SAQV;XD%(`rh*?q#UhS#{h|ItX}=Bp`pXiZ>kO1j z&OvlpNWDl2_q9`Xmh{`F^FN;_A2@8(K$4-u z*Iu*d+om$Y?~}8t4H**G^c3UKIM456H^fbo7|ip6s4i*_p}O`_2F?MvhQ@xG>SHQ&s9_k*m(jAsJp z_py(Pt@FZk@jd?tY-rLY`ai{q?=j?*?@6@x9n~Rrbkms8 zM8rYya$=qk4ZUN=%=zl7p)%*Eb>ckvLdW)drH_dJ`TfzkfoES=JJCOkxzvBA;{Gab zpXs$$B&f|o1K}RXdy%gG>*A*x;MBhOx|ph*@Z01N<3{R?X&bfR32kD&7YRK^1;14N z5|4Cw@J)DsT?+T(knrD^ z!MO2+I-0bL^5ybzLhsCTh0kb!%jM$+9*O4}+wQG#M!8??j|a-fqu`J17L}xYPlb=4 zJs-05!#Wvq_xh)`4>tSF%>G05$p+kL6mdw=gcJ_32nykRKNepH9J#eZbdWO#cR()n z8*yJt%J7=!gC(5fkqBPQzKPZl3Af=oCaV|9}2%$GaCHRR;ym*v*qUVeJK21 zO(*zY7A`R`kNx26_hcISi~5@k{qyLHX*$e^s1n@q3u>1GMi4S>iwkiqN!|lLJmCFx^y6dy?^4}drB;YV}ArT&cPABmmC`n}cneP;0dg8b$2R%H_YCMGVp$MXup z^>+i;-=`PP(5Y=A;DqzIWrqA2^}i7s;BtRu1a3n*k zX*kd0%hVE4MGFC^{FL+YOz?Yq2K`ewigOYv@s;y&Lv<0KiLG}UiMGvRq>=*W}Hf+Rcx`EkFHGW>QD zeGs zdQ7lU_`!eks&5J4ckR(-LWqHxA|<}Ey`+HO`0p`?eBDT{`lgIGX`+5434Ufkp1)HO zQCq}EE>G%5B5_{G=Ufj?T`%Im^TH7&i}aCYiBIJott@v*pRZiB>F@jw-ZMe0#vV&+P(&^L<>r3R zILYLFKkqMpxaRqO&$;KEd+z!?$#ce#3j~3u<2vQ-AJ;z`A>Ml=KEdLX34Y!|Z4QnDE?%K$cxl~ zys$ETUca-?VXeb){xsofYWkj4kAx1dE&uWPiQyxu7GHdo31~MD^mp0+==zAvp}Pc2 z!c|Ga-beqTG%AmSfaOOAImu6Q=@_(2&f83Ip)Jhe~v*{W?ShQ|X>M)_5vGGDNH zNv**52PwYYX0JakwaffShaAY&fPk4S-}_im>!Uix|%X>5?84e0pnDU6*Jxl zOni7h{NL*H{{AQQTTwbkr);BsBJ#?C>$HxyzNc2xzF5>3_uFUw8J7`TxuFPRZcks?lU5t3xJi-bCm3yj` zr*+!%J@*H(=b2Or{LVc6R>DZftn~*c?VJdILOt`PKURE?tHI-^H&w|3m3f*G;LrZ! zs_h}kKG>JXS-=f=ZuQCmPdPQiwFVgv8c$ze3i&A%xHlf*&IPi5&0Ja1_wfcsmD#FJ zRrq}bKW(1m#gSf=jsv6j(YZMZ`S`Fe89aJUs`T-1{s~VZrYuGKB;mb>^gfF;$W;z6 zR5S3rUGQVUk3S-xhsXp!x$dN|Ba-~}i+-O1d$hG=Tyia3d_2UmL)8LvP_Rf1eEY-jb}t{`z%wrN3o$GoMChYnJ~JdFzBe zBX~W&yLyY(+XA=XI<33*HouxLPmpyx#m5GI?}b+;ftFpX$cw=C5TKY(O|ZiOdCChn z{-*X5e32K5db}M&6sCZ7j-4XgRq(xjsNDE_MESn8#I@au!KY@fp1T>iG7Ovo@yEeJpxZ9yYM|8XQRWfDL)0C4m=Ux zgV=QM{zBUS`Sg=K@WBbK*5rnM@w-UrsGr)E-t(oXFXOSk?2xZS?0KGud<)DA5hIar z@uUy(CX6R0{LS@*ueiG*G6ocG%8S@suME84yzZuY%RafF0 zu0*F(?g+aB^$Wei?lh7^Np@@FWgG(S*5kUAfA{_P415ooz6TorUG8|wH^CJjG2YUB zjx_Mi(0BH|wqJw<MCjYq?&M$pi{B~W7yTz+ zlVE-;0)AI6o!RT_Pp#!S1g$@7&Wql!ikA)wT-#9kN8|F*w$}=T02lsJ|BnOD{6fZW zNAInFsKJxkWINNjAJvyYa)Tf^Tcw4=aFw-35ch#RrHrE#8ul!#*4n+5|6*R9?{QDxGv;Heg^*jAN>xW#J%Sx zdE|Ibzb|;$n(rslDcXs~0b75We+%1`_K?2<*Q}J+sU2U|nQ$wNjjJx$<3Xu<-E4^l zxVN3N&ugiEU1RBI$(ALf=zf^6ReVH!4(Ks}*K^%b7wvlmo`C&|8F-HY{W{QjAI~eY zC)JE|t*LJhlV7qnUtZ;~&knsw-S=nz-Z1e+{RaGgy$ig75sNC39|EU%YMMwtV^qUJ zx&0*XL0p{!YptU58X>QToDpS@{3$cYKY?3OuNip7kcYqXb4&})sVLt0v`@$L_O?Tg z;;TM&t1P$A2|Rv)jN5~;(H>qu#PwV8{tD9nW!VFM?;&vD_dLze)2zU~pK1Ln^c!*AiZbu6y}$DKxZ$52`1$12 zskH9&#TU2}xI3fq3clW?{L_GUY-{d3Jbs#H(r+X1#czkCF#l9pcV&O<{IGc&kyp>U zUmc)Yawhw^QX}MPo!9@;l5(ME|GFc%Ui*}0;Iz&wym-vXtc`L{;Kfx|;Pr%n_Y<~m z?2xk?7Ecxb_r+(X9A`6o$mhL3I`>manqLI&B>i|l_sHM%e!utYLA%j79J8%n2ERX~ zF-rewo%q?bQ&ze^B*p_f^t(~&!C%$&!_7 z0ss1StAp~8Y7qYFVTT>O7tt?9uzXR{yhG0+58oN}Yq3rD9||2_d8G$(^c?cp9rL!w zcAwIWa9wj54|)zc?%>(Vs$Rd009+xID=v6Hj}qTr`Kjs4RpS3%`?K?f4&$r#UiaqN75i@j7x8yN zp5pHrD9<}iE^8kfbUX#0;_t!VW!AQA8!Y}V#82Ns#;KFOT1Va=-ROrV;3M+I-Qw%e z!1+)56{4_V9#TT1^V?tMN;E!R(3g=D?CEM4o374^P|wf$bIZbGg>`bA$iVd!lp8anD`{eVux}i(74fe> z#inn|>(7Fmww3hz(|X!=5llV~*U7(oQ`6Lu4A&L)*S|9%b|S5*h5aVr^qga_Lm&Pc zlBn=~1a2E8$GH^Lv+$czL(~jU!*vJrT>fDDd!g^}?B6BN0Po7<$}Pfxi+nIvk>hw0 z{LBLHW}y#ngeUmS$o@z4BL~{cg7@oaTg$jao+;l^6Q51>{YTiJ1by+~ZQozU9s!=f z6HqU;f77R5T;ubwKEywMa~7Ol&F9H9=%web8n?<969T)1{`dnjei`7MAN15h&vOZX z$o~}JSt!$+EL;2 zK5c4W<|6G2gg=SEQ&IMC+{vAb=}*UX>MwQvUH&E-xY*yPpuMR-B%pmVA-ASo!%E_J zAe4%CA08*l6GdC;zp8PKhIwM&amD|F<%t3Oy|uU274Ki?AHfeCm(1XsANMiki}(n^po17#j`FwXdNKr z>HEiV;6>l=y_`QMl7Q=p`2O+CX{BF;d*drUUcYmE|2PT!9|t6zr*TTMCEwIY_E-A8 zW(xSlKB#k&?!R$<;PXG};Qv0S<5aQU}L_Y`qhEwu$jY- z(=yv@uXlWeK8j=Lp@N-x9O-?)q(24x-(Q=v--{<~5g(y10eBk9r9c0Dkm4ue78l@; zkQ4j&IPf!3l8oXL=`Y1Z@WuXJhwI{R5vSy0{&_>^hXNP%2IAtnsMiEN848@=*<^lO z{zJVftX|Q7G(%*)=~Ja#>`AGoNP(tn{+IKk4Cu4Gy;v;R`H?j+UZ484zsipH!5@vk zo>#=^`7Z~%yw~)DpM`(k_E08(PwU>(5jBc-K9YQc@Fd{0?j86=iIK0iKJX2BUU^jt zaJv8bj<^_!6X6yW8>1@EW7anr_if7kKtTf{h%2As}U>AbOg-jXk9oR*TZ ze`LVl49I=3qUP^>yjFCS{!)LexuMTtHb1M3-Q~W4{B2O~Zfx@t+8v?};cq(}7?m7ZUS>~~np^`}E`Cd!&AeJXJMskp8%$vFJ@@7fh= zRzIDK#RBj9cZF)945#O&vj)m`x)Yw~I@h0$=c&nl*YsEWx&6t|OYy0jHrLPoMBu3? zJ5;$4N%o2HkoNhcpZY`3ajn0hdSq+K_Oe9FcFcsnJIlYGz~iOuEaO1&I=@r>5BG=e zXOaBO=zXQQd>rHxP@XUQM+VvJ&BxGm)SCo+LUP6x9#4vQ3h*kQH-8rPF5c>t%Kr0C zU-OjO+`kOSQ9NoF$y`fu5cOvPr+7D=U2ngi{dk|Kwu_9zfzI3RaR1|QoyOnu?duoj z{-r^G0(b|f=;wyNvp+PR{0ClY$L&)Z;9`7>rF?xT{Y(LG^XnIvBNE9|SqgqC^?&>h zbsG5Fip?k$nUIrD-!F75m-;io-6Pwe7e72#P^uBU1eMfw_JEBSDZgz#5Wf9 z#Di!2XU~CX@Vt2Tc;_1cz2ZMKTGq~3XitjJB;;v4q5WNnlfR5s!ViI`K`-_9lH6X0`L@+pRGt&l6}0tlYZ*&kq+Y$s)t%d_(T0Y z1Nsc@-)`XbIq>@&r0>LU8BwH1$j5eZ=#@q+5FdcNFa zE}sawWRznkH!no~`q~?IrvhK5oz|YW2enr^@bZ>VzYb&VMdJba_u&cKEAF47hxCuy zW7^7J7I6EtZkbQ9;6*oGeV_T4yw^v^`dQT_Cu)4Zjok0m>J zd&PsFjIzy~ts8kfGT~<$@Kvv-AEk2}5wAGJD+Bn6{ly+>5D#Hb3i6-&e-?NVqeExW zIStt(_;jB-3-_tDJ!QO_xRx!6j3cHjMg2+89}nKQtFwC0?@S7u`i}|5E{>N97574=xFaHsr1mK|^j#s2}QqiC2dt{Ez za{fpHZ;I{W(}-aG3Hg=+UX>Azzt01n(3gh&4gFq7I(WyvZd^|rtMK~>e&GH&6Z}a{ zdmqTF^`ra7ufXR{w0&e;w)`_WUyPToWFlhUpJV^*#eL@uurnU=^t?b4{^okbd4m<# zg?bTJI=7+kk4#QX&mtLd9$^pIw>tym>D-3o)5i__;+?!o9r(SMrP?*$l53)Vecyn* z+4G{c67llIwX*Ebq~Az*=v2mU6X z1Yg841J}jh!jCNct|xu}W@ypXSIIsR$E<)jYWqpQN#2J06R~)&`@*kxw^YRnRO(Lv zKX$a7H+#0wo_~VBJ^XBpI!OLG@f--*n*#pg5o%YcRGa;;h+Clj0`%n{ zDLQ<^L{qp^##tkCP+EG=llzm zme=ObxBV&ik-CYJzwJQVe^hb)e9?|6n2(c`@_gdQwM~~O<0X&VYkDU2xuEar(Qi$v zgq-^5cgj8R+cWX|Lm}Ytym6qumowTwRVL=F&yywVb4-%-|0$f| zHsJ9CWgMsV?wni0a0hV8ucl{SYa$r#0#5llKXUQSNQQfW)9;mLYU_R*#c|E_OSt{bxyyoHox|90H=M~;jwvI z@b+;5r*-U}ISroj_OZZ!4|sR;{81(kYai_$+5dEdWgM;)bT!g4oYr~95ZQk>9>Km_))S|&2ai25cTig4~MQ+ zvie<+qyGD6$cIO191`|`-2_VX}obv{_r97hhX(lzdSs+SmR*zIib&u za$jT>1Mfe&q0)cqKO?tgtmFMB+kfz8UV55I{U?|`Hoa#YyA475!Y$F+)*mu%uv=}v;7CJ z#~)o5g#qXGPa%2DPVC_fag$ulyO=F+%{L&;zzi7UFQ7rmK zu>2zX%+=-iru=L}VzB!3&}T$>dwj|bo-Y<$kH!3Pr1H8t!SclhUZb<;=2O0i_Mr72 z*`pu)V|JVbPUj3R$RF;IX(Bs)?TPEOewbb~{Bs@;-3S>En!g@?wqY^FL&#Hm8o;|- ze#lAgAFU@T-nE8KXu$PTdsrYp__K^6T)z$1Y5g)PPxVT{^izC$+zCCw^*bQ%Lb>hY zihDf19$csScX*z{EqHv%Kixg{Dzd5g5UcmKxAV=$muXiNR4W?f= zO8S4py|S;Le(VD+SiiSzS$HbfZ-N|+!+nq1PjUSg;IuxuI5>ZGuHOLMhSGI#_ekD; zF4*q?o^|#8A-w$zz+J#wM6C?x>n{`9-vfO4o-2Rz^_K(vLpNIbU%$%+D_l@(LD)nB< z*Jmc+F5vqPXeZ=NdAI&D0QUgT+#0hd2DlhsZP>q=v5wb`k#ShN*5b^Ebq>uEf^Pvo z7WrTRU;F2^+xaohbG`|DBlMfWe;jq=O@T!J{i4wC!2VSaz72e3&9IyACFJB=z;|Ik z>jeL8e47yk<8$&o*q_^J{|o-Isr^>!;&Srs;5%twKUT))qtkEng<^B^_25~c-vs`M zl>JW&Yjg57Bjx(r2)-5kwCNA?7g6NoyT;3XBK2nn_^Ya%>s>U9A}>o{Ji({mJ#d5H zC^XO7VwpMlwgA3vob-40xc)K4gRHM8f3!Pr{sDgZCNIvHNYAOC^2gjko{L(*A6l(Y z-q?Wkh_IjXhu%kPCws1sy;w3er+&(xtnJbs7x?YtPI*eDKIq5G_|*8fYuoa%Ir)M4V*-EpoIA@ZXmj!d z&z-H{cb{4Ra78bj_W*Hjscj?s3te}BFEoq!SbN`pKYR4iqz-(%)J%}}(|9?^T(?=Tkdy z+Rv(To!rakQzvlRA2zHyU?iVU-N0%8RN>^!DSSTFOqBl9e&NsUm$&ozR1cii$KOR) zU(DA-M&PubERcC2iO;uY;Iy8LE}}2T=UXdqS`Q7bf5^n=TRU)C&y;N0K0lvtoxo|m z(NMd;1)p!-z-hnVq*fsdpKmpjr2n)Zy8HN92R`5Gfzx?Fra7w<&mSXj+AnYUtbRJ5 zZ_U7If4I=5;`tS71y1{?V?UHDnlD9Wv&b(yaM~~I>iApP{0w&jr}g^lXI&~3V7MDN zt#=pizaIY{!!?to|FqsbIs3xXf(+LKr}-tSde?3`h8uy?daiewrRNJVT#x)SgQqHS zzIb7Vr#`@Zhx4R^n%GEw-eQLwt!GAGIQc%0uM@Zq>zb)uzICzwoBjQ@S6AEJ7g2qA z?D&HjV>44QJ}5O)r2q6B-=NK-*FAEr^W6jT#$TxiPS5eZcj)S_HsQ{{Ag?k4ABREV z%iDb~57*Qi1UxjMh@5w5zWpX??F$;KMEhDHPvb}BQ_H8&_#oyxy8jT5^L%Qj_OGji zE7M7nteo?yy{TV5D%-o*f4g6i^jw~Ydtgt8Q{gRD8UI;7fKz;Kz1bJZ?RNpE_SuzkX|kH>C;L3$sq>v{6$+fk)2Wu{yHs|J z`eB69`#a(MBkUo644=!m{PCpdOci(nH{&|x?}LbFbqMfa_0c%^OUvGCgVkq+K0C^5 zX@hpFS$!^Cr~L2r&+f!fhG+W^Ue)=NtAza*d&sZN(R0n@7sbHO|1YHfGl#UyOaA%% z$93!9GC#j4wP!!s%l#+6X`WU-I5bun=byivPwird{^CEr|7kG$tiW9;Q>X7*#N(lv zD($9mCAC(Rk>Vljr+DeX`=!*F=ix!(Mg4{PYvZad$0!5(H;cjh&4cFtJ z%6RGKcQjD{;{MZmgzD2&Uvo?u>mM&sp9A__C{O-aVl?lMnrYI1T3?t-u6P^D`fIlT z;MG|%P7?;4+e7U^_B=O~JP??_!T4tAEq%}Vaj^EI{$&I2fu-7Mo?lK}r}^VZ{V~p9 z`9=2Wus@Ev^~LjG^|_%>^QDYS?hSW-=J{g4by^P`|JbrISiYFRYjv=o_jkzUxFOnu z&M(Ox!>uXZC{6;W^Gh4#k6zn-fb8_OC$7`|pPq|)6y@=70jKp|w?Pe$P&|Y@wWkNX z)GfWwasOz3pm@J}==hE6r}i*Rm+>jrr{7bq--PS5o*z`@h&h;kif^8JEgf9H1@bnO zraCb-d3+tXPV23DidWrve91o-co|#Lztgbz)A=RE|I^(~7X*vHZie)4SpUB+@%S5X zo%SP3qo%pJ{U+eFULJcxU7N>;?6ZJZr)kVn9v{+A`x1cc zftS#=U8Se-kv{w2xxA5#xa#c(+a`YvkfM##JNmV^hynie|VD^Ntz#)TZC321y1X|_bRx@ zhces_oYqgBXWZQFeOah4MMeHNseY_4M#kK=dtd&Xjk`%6^XZ@>zvkC4T=SLmkLHiG z0#~L+FkBCu#@pW8<1a@t+z6b;yL>&iY>i^L890p>`l_#QEzcwcHnfrk-DwKhrE59z-c}{ zvR&hSKO}2^;B>w*;KxyAdHZO-mj2UtotXK{0p31(;56P=8TsWM-abym*9hK%Kcn;H zLH&N?E&87syjtTD((VS=PQYCh5pE%r8@k#^9UMW zX`-}es`twMeX+yR{ALmGG5#_e|jr}66h z4uhZY{SK|aJm76O`t};_cl`1P=P5L=Js#SwE}c{Gc#=Pcc``1mwmJLp^9nPrQyxAZ z64{fVS6G3Q{HR(3d+_rLJ8&9bzpS+ADV^H&up?U^879J%# zgZZPGFa1fZ(C8w!*MRG^KTWx~d>+{wtUj7|VjF$(HZXp{_!j8zbgxmLVD_1S+fmNk z=q$$L;lg#APwLG&eum<~62;fR;OsXeLRb>G}n=a>Hr5EtC)yOi3T^tCUp(|T>_p1(if{^=G; zziGX2ty9m^+&_x90lfAN*MH9aqw$seUwNhB8Lpq=Yk~Z-W|^h9ejBdSdU4UJ9o4vg z2XKq=*ZI_hC=JVh+8F`raq7E z5KO-Zyp?Olg>e0pKdBi1^Aw4i$@LqSNWW=Z%XN5u8rN?EPV4c8?K+?0`gOo9C|}fh z)|t1T19sVfFV=^h;O(aa?f`yy*Nd+sSo@jKt}fu(^8c2NWVi$Q?*U%w@13us81BY6 zqO(aq6Z)Lmn2X^$;0ECOb#I$QGu(}N$OQa@fB%@Ao8da(7T}|n-O%J=xCQgF4fu@ccFa zr}fe5+&!XrewcvM`sLx^t5(gLbolSF`f#ES^6G*iZ9or|_vC^7y+TN9(`GE7s_E{5`;F zJymt%k9~Rkb<3syw0^j(=(CH*-vFHEMDA&4+gI`WA1{G!!`Z z-x-ekl_(dNeVD0?^Y>rWN9zwa^i7Q0SWN|e0AFz!f*p{lAoV{$Rstx zO~5JtTo*oj63TG$#{%B&CePc30T1R6)l=rHVYkRmYESNu1NwS*Khl!h>&A7;w=G}I z=|%PitB=MFOZ&|cf$2Xk`00YySO9zwqd?|A5nY zR=!Qwh5Y=F>@$KltweX#a1f;XgE^J%<&Xg!&Ue%Uqm zvaRHYsNV`XS`QdsU(ew7+kw;hX~RXAj&u7d{!Z{Vl^I@=+fVxu@~=|D{z6gN&2xLZ(eWZBJQ6XIL+6!v-bYZ{iFId-$?(54I9{u`$zg|J+)_j zBk%iB-<>ZTAxHOH&+PdnB$$3Pc!h8Lx{dS)>mPJKZeq=Q3FIdq?r-{ek1Ub5&^!iDWOFaG-;I!V`UgcRK9)BBfnr~On7&nc_ z-vONVCsBJ#@8R)x0jKr7^3cfoJpLZwbe|({vHH_^{B?HeH_dkgUmniI<8J^?&kMEe zcJu=te-m&TZ?*Gx-sJJO0H^Wt+U`f6@c0{GpAEbng`&3PLHzl6X+S$Uz>E4l>IW_Q zDUFwcPxrfY=+`droqvBZG;gf``dIMk`w0&03p5*LJj!fnlNO`R!4C`kK7axIw`os) z$fxk4(NS(pzc6bfW4xAn(v8U zvHFecq*vg&P5%AAN$E0v_xlaNNj@f{>%I`wBjioMY5i~daKq48&! zsy+OABiet7`f2@O1n=9+ZAyi~&S3sfJ%#OU63I?#PwtNu`p#@G7|rc<;5v=3u?s({ z$nA9jC;7DldW_`udVte@V|eb&{$wxrN4HtVCB5jYp5gF^+egpseQ#D^>pJ;!uWDydB`RepBx*Jueh2-n8F{yfCSt z5`Iv;gYiAkYyElXC;zQ|^xw<)H0-Wk!rRA$>$IN#@T`Mf*nrb| zxxlpe$HCgi0p68%H3stbq5C7$Z<5dac8L7;#UI~a^+5h_*NYP5r@(bvq+hh&&;R26 z?c6^Da2o%QT`@G~{!#mwz}vWM&iC9u+K-U`?c4Qg$Mw_rWP^Ozl#5fjeh048{C?u4 zVJFw`0#5Q1Zro|bBNX3Uv)dI37GD$O zD>uHjg~!)|>$Ltjd))n$`)>nI^J8Z3ugh`&$vy{o1B+{Ka{oy`t^eIUnv~%BJ&>dI zfAPD2F6BUpP|kS}`R z?v~36M>5=neq;omR^jEkD2`)1F#{hry<283h8t+S0bcsU*LkBEZl>`X`1389)pIl4 zhWX72yk^qH^gImD-ml<%)V_7)0iLh4U(sxr{y%MgLrLu@;+wr+fxOZCetM=~Q zJU^_!slOJOk9$!6hS}&}eTBF4XROMc|% zLoPaBG0X35j@&u3nL7U6`G5&>w7>u1+#gdy8Eyei{x!ZtMW}a<)fA0Yvi}UQ%#-m^H{k_g1{igodM%`c|-`^X6)BgVD z#c}8P{@w(f`eV%R<;Dct-&?@TXt{W29{9)C7Y5jA18@72J?F5uLDCRd}MReqxHp0?&0eV7vyNY@No3OqkO&L3FyBsdsq2__fOqk=|A<)p*J$_ z^Zsc7PVwt{V@+}1KTW`?{U7hG)rj{`3vlY62L_+7!~3TVIQ7r*zqTC6`=ksuGc&&F1l~VAz^Q%PuKwkDu>PsrC*v@)$?%E6`lk;4(*Rz<*eMf&^-uae z4r(tG`1*^}<_7DZ9<-koyySM{+6U{OI;@*r`+HR7{lf)0EBfaoYw9eXe@^sITF;c& zzR=G5pYA8=H}$_etyYcX`VGLT|IIEneiQG1Cg9XQ4F{Cj#`~WIIOUIGV8wF0|Ji_3 z`&7+8y&CU-4&c=Po^3z)G4Fpa;MD)RR47`Q`%mi`4|t^u?|RGop9k^N{Ve0KBxY~B zVEvEIm)JqIe&^dZ$WweeMBVGe`*UY4oLr~|6Ff3 zJ33hZF@Wdncw`dqKPKom0e{_YTlZl7ht5B1)x0-G#o}v&9PL-v9vm?~gyDvO{-cb4 z(4F@W7v!mbOillEH18iC;M70%rpzhL`-kqJ^q=}iSM&Jgynh&gQ~Qj#`)5<$KTN=> ze^ht$Ud;Q41vvGO0vQEX2kRd;@GgwMRXbS!p!K~2yx8isYXs{bbU%mU?E-(<)V-I3 z^$!Q)qd6qwps3cTV9@@7bDw@u)&!p4Cde7lKiqAart$pKU_VLuKl85+xBT)S@)X~S zd!Ib;%YWdM|HYO+D&m*_z$v~>#rw?J`ql%S@?W28X%)ZxKkT3Xmy7C-1kHc&x7a<-}O_EAL8?e4RUlI^K!@}zw>ibK>pWj(fV(m-!78J@70I) zX@7#}w+A@ocfTq?x)=eG$s#sB?j*9r#9Zwq*{ z$JHGdEWd5*q#ZW!hL3yrDp-Eg_x~uK4)Evfo7^mDe#3t^cxkgr{}U{~O*r>F5W227 z-@h1sk#^~k->JVA`JU&W9{El2+uk3pkD6gT}9U5G;Q^;H6xcUzz8x3Dy(la*m@zaR>r2Kn+H>N(%KiyI3H^rxX-{lqf z_-O!6`8TTDs{K6wOu#As)T(~EVEJbO@4R+xeV%_F*lz<~%oZBP^N-H==>AskWvb$Q zeeHrAokyF-jl0YHuPq?|)O8;p;`yaJCjF=UDtz+EF`i!r;FMnl#!Xtp^UDOB;5g=x2sL(E zy1=(iT$COxKMcS%zsWfCjC-&=Sbos`(a-zqCh`0*L5}W6?o66im7gzIkss9lBQHD4 z__aUesr{Eusdp}D`-3;Rw{9nIe+#a=P*&Ld#TDNEI`~KTo3>h7iO-_6|DU%_G@2>`U$z|Id*YAnTFq6 zF+tCOXk&AFj#uDxKb7P=U!8n_%iADF&li--I=z<5JAl)9x3T}aHh$0l0;l_}6$TD? z==c0DaJv7Kw!@PBJhHG)mm&S9^V88WaRd1M9RqMW-t|Hp#(=uXQxJS)_wIluoy@^pT8l1aC{`^%4AJ5&8b7I^%TB*plx!Hcu z30!kV+B2eekv6=)=y9FKqblF6`YIoj_n@B{!TYt1xl?|In{l1SyLw%JHWy&H2ji3# zyqTsx9o}QO0k|FbCtD7?3o_h^>oguEt~*{{$8ZnkK{t3y|7iACA%^RKYtBmls~;S@ zzc9n~xK8WExYJWg7Gbyp>j@+A{x#ez%5kjc%)s+a`8l;1!>zbZ>#dpL7b+KLxB=^7 zJ9wSH9q_UQ!*#z%yPd$F?EU-0ScbcCoz5HF3tIeMlHr!aQeJaTmi6>QT9#tC0sDD9 z@Tc|uY5zXMjkr$xnPW$XMVDr{1?MSd@alfrBB2b!bvQ4x0xxnis(o38+i{)xTTJ-< zb>$dtzG_MRD-!gTIlfcYZv`)=S*glZfQ#{h&Uf7#CC?7tz)q8| zRK_iOFi^^lTWul*ifC} zM&Q&wEjnEpQiI`U;FRB${`k3MO@>>6Q~wGZ-G1Q*z=c1S6|#O)3j7D(RkYXm5AnTI z@?Y3%0^bQ`4ZX6=km-G5gM9>_&Q~0BW&OGfh{xgI_SDMA z$*1-*fo}x=Swy8{wR8SHP#E1G^URTYE#S}JdG}DAw4D0semBj3cJQl>8mF$C>dzPP za6zvNJeyrTsvdX(*SKW8v|is|GJlYqE#EIi+c;ZEQ*zSZkjX>4QQqW#QMq<{3jHaGYi zr&?T1QgX)2Jz4TK7iBrSYQdUK!4vVa0yhAkxb3qh&47#gXnv>nhnT=C+jHb}W3qpJ zf=}z)SbTrY0{;D#ld_s8<>Z?J-XCHIUo)$lqeWs)KIJ>TKg31$bX_~4WkOCqo!8L& zLo}CU96m5?KieukC!hKUy+6bN{*2EAMH!;53z#pY<2R$r|CKQlt1+T5C{1B3#%t~ zNXyBm{Gs=UxWWH9an9b3sX6(SKlJ_(-5=85V^Jj*cJlp-{5u(6KI8Xw>HQ%_@IPMX zPBSIHf%#(xzecZrx^zj*$*26G_lLN^-?jJZzOD&5 z`IJBO{t(R->2F%vhwg6iIr)M4V*r0_zrAz2$K~V)=8qYC#{y;l9m>EK@Vkt=zCWK| z$chh-%l}rNcYOf;9+dG>ZOYIpQOtMxOc@87|8KwkG+zkvPT)r16#x9?RX@=Ctc5+M zN&bF&_R7EO?f9cXPXE2XmjQiNl)dXj77j&y!TfW8H}%zw-eEEf+5d`m4~(ablUm_` zzb?pAyKAloZ}(VS7xKdIlw|1#ty@oPcjs5e3smBX;L~$tW$vlxsp19dYp3krolIUV z-}{sdezllZzlHdEjpPRMX`V_2f5F09wbZfixWqR#l6e^$AOnDOr04+L;VJZ_MuY zD)5+{VS#qq!5@*wt>jFa%vpa@kY(BA<(iYw*8yQui)k+39^^8#WX zaoc6S<^{3Bo5$-1C)Qmk{uFU^fbU!{c{Gm2pZaO?``udceyXYLuRjj_ z>P^}|r1^sD%YuCg;0?Ka`ZeW(h-08XLRR$449F!zj$~5tH^oHoMI0TtF8&sA%v>eM zQyO&0&f{wW zPVu$h>6=XP74jC~lxKggc$`S%pTLcaWIsqiJX^mgaFy~);N}e3z7FUa{mZsY$`OIP zr^(;J&zAqKTplj(M7z?weW_F9N6L8Vp^(?z^Y^cJ>SrfZ4ELa319<9|i{FMY+ztDv z{?V11mgn`GAZJ1O`q`n1Y9{Z3ejD)ji#$sWWw;|iKD_ELqrw=TfcGr8z^gEH?C;?W zr~6Z6-%MrY8QebIegAR55xs09U++=;==qetzkGkEGEw3Ci1?WxPv39=sgSJdYKPWd$A^qaQ`{MUd;T<y%A2YV}+Mr@M z#m^3&Hes42gyBwHr}%k3-(6SDaEhNBytuU&mQx-H`!s+0=ldAb$2y)r^m|KMj7KZa z#{JIQKjECr4;s(EU7fozjj_J=gMMnCY2S8tsA6RV1#SdxMVT_@j5>tjc3h|UjeLH) z4EK-X?*#AV-l=c6f0lc2tF}JG?biS| zqTI3W&#l~kvd;|sXs#)H)y%(?^ZxO3*nZr}>$eB!54kzzSFYa)ob0RJrvF>6pXzsm zw|qpw%urUp9rFRnuT{>C^7HSJ^k0uM_EoR6FeYy$`+(o>^wGg^hP%-&X5eXs4|+7n zPu@TE;90@jI_RrS5#TBC3D!UD;LpA~`b1&k*=WAHv?hwrS7zYUKf^Cge#Pf2ZH&xMD|mZ`Sf}v$ z%3+ka9r)@W3U;S)NZ23S(jSlg{#pl)yCIj;fy`Ccz)<{-S(-B-=-aPR`dLD zBEClOHqEL&Aez~y2W|%5|9YjWxfxFD6$A3r@qR5EkB=R4l)op|9Sh_38EF28{LF}m zJA8bk_m9$gqN2yMm&aH0RQgTx^UQv2FNGv3d>_&NG=I_krzssKA5$j1!;O%S#XMMj zX1-b~hSU6I2G4PG#*z?*Td97uZ&Jzd0&0fS{ACBPW{2c_p$vE8I<0?>_Ss!447hi^ z$g!SsgFmp$*u-%7DZP>VCp~b@-!d*G7I*5U0nZl?tRE;|ueN?YD~#g>WS*EHzqRGS z1yqla*P*>ge!-}{jY62b4RVC{YNb8O*FzTI4wOYgo@u##DG%lEm{NQ9tMN%E-rk-7 z{mq8HpNrS8d*+`HlfQghkJs;lyaBxEI7e0lvp?gx+$U508}_WY#_P8P==&jQ|#J8#2$HzvF_hNQzpNQugN3hL*r%N zW{Wqg7*6A%1w8A9!w*6jZo_q&&ypJquC8V{jfW2Kx*Vw0E|lReTqpkq9N1YYjN!DN zCi_*1*A8?2v|iM`lzzk=pEZ~3H{d$0=PJ)zdsg#Kf27$V*8wK*D#sTr5CL4Q-zdL5 zBDas`<$sC{?NzSfQA3n6dD zI@AI^$!GJOm(!L4mvp7a~Q zJ5zp2S#Ce=C&>P=-JWvXeiP|Oc_g~}U*Rl%9@uRIo)&4n$MP%G2HXLBuHvinlwTtL zwtRB@r2T5{@WEqMvUwB&_dw17J^y}Iq#F0%1zh)9#$jCZf#oPKg*>$%#rH(!RWpx| z336n=ZK10Ux8Gs+-*0+G6-rk!`)rV>_^l~5>K>1u132x6cdvzXzw-9ey+Qi}?_RC@LEb*PP5$;L)|*z6+ixOy!oe-C&&ixucb;{=*R z<_pFV-CG%#L*M;&H=2znMqH=!;D1*So0*&8I?S_#pV(Br3_tI+LY~H>-(H3u;Ok#I za2n4~>{{N7uYb+JohaAFzATZ4)$hi2nol3K=+{vT+@Mfv43Fe`$b@-Ohj!EaEB!rL zeAK?YiT?LLc^qlqt_NS^-lLC6pa{N;d*HcRBKYsGb6N7m`}0LV)4`q;@D8=xGcZ4R z0=HrvlMXy)_T5DVfD6BLI7imMC+}z2@OLKos}FeoeJ?JjU*>@O9}2|>MW=ZEso8XI zr-HHmc8WOUxc>pZqf?=;b=sVKUEuu>@Rv5NzPgYXM<6meg~iTf8e$U9LA zTs)tW$^I7c(w>y(Opcbay%Ps)*~rF4rDw3jjiGY>KG*3%u45+-w3qd%)Nx7~2kPt1 zEK{@1^^J?bb)%)8-s6kMg$iNsN8m{T_=EMW28Kyk;nn#v691<%0)G!2Hn!ie(Zfg5 z`&7hbufA-1)5tE{j;W_U9nl%M_mzkK_V(`;T>~orYkj?Yjq3Nw=w74y5gGNRDP>$@ zRnR;3*ODHsB3015_NWu+y13x|JV-H3mH+eMp$gzhD693J@{iYV-$%qJ1@@)@Uo~*# zq;TLOJ~8+|m2`i&SMO1yNA~J7df@P3t$K~`H*yqsqTq4LfZjY)ZEdr5J4XXoYeM|v z^eF6b3sNEM(gP>EM>iTjlG~jIy+-h^=T6}i1;;2xBBFMm^t4|dg7b@eI zfU@3`ZrdmhLZ8zh*J+wsveey@<8x43z7y zJ|D^3SrI1fqj~jEwK}~cFQXaUli#Uwf?WC(iE!`AJ_PE@;Pe@Xt0&-We5_lOGFy%2)EdG7J3Slb(N` zD>f%TYpK+qfpIrBQpRb$Azo}@&%-r4qi`(yez6s+;)<9WLGWa4a z-u|G@>@2TaC(3fvr82z~82Chg$pD|)ZR0dubEQQ{`{YBjfK%T5``t&IRMvO6W46>w z_-s?ds>d9QcHkb52 z4&`9y)Z^hyK0Y9R%hJ0);_=I{$vjIU`HC|(as4T{o&@{MbDOnRv-qU}C;Pv=U2sPz z!!v->czG*1>K5PECy+eKa<^9Q*D(9F(b7K}Pq#csZyUjI>oz%0$AMSs@f%enaBqJN z3miWZ!0R_CxqKAzP=Sx&2aX>};1^oEaC9y+F=Z+Ef#XLi_<15nMn#+a`;*`YjvpD| zC*Bx*Dz`BwKXCj|MFxzfXretv|BxHy?+@`a_dP`Yj^w9amH-{bjq?N0V6G zdw(yvzm!i*j60O~^!>KuLqBe=OqFDT)B6t0(7S)<(qB~!r{_zoz)SzWNgu*+JK2Nz zX4$#A->Mnz1Ww~l>Q|pM31v8)SGvJFo9}eNFotWi(qChBxi21<*nXP^xHpf&jgZq- zl(-)Je1+P~k4RDYeFUGLi%wZ7$5SKtU2o1mE6%BSyak`0i;e}~0{)pw<|5*JJCIM$ zMQ7r7nC#$BJz^;%?sEn5>AC2H@p2w@fnRZWwQ12o=3TO%p6k}+mGKEb)puU*_?-I5 zetNFk0RD#Q$4cc1GVhZ8^jxo!=F`UJ)KB))bKN%ZH~-zaPhM?Keqg_Gg1stxLO5}5di{5HnO_)z{kXXyv={5J!q zy!l%_Yh^^LPuwSO1y0}pj9f8bN+iSWz-eAeyp_5;is4S+H1E%;*RWJBhP#2&yj{vs zc3L#UHTk6d)PF2*^7YTna6NFEcMm=v);15rjlgN%9aJ?{t!20wIL%8J>TPY7m*H06 zH1E9qX#L5UcepZkjf}f~h%76td--vr+cCc9;l1%!Iw9{;NPN@9_@(7`)hny;egy6Y z9;=dgz4ES=niDPS0#|ABOaGTEnlu*I%JdmC^~BR=D}XEY!1bR=`R6~5>$&9nxEX{S zfv3a17UgO+j9S{vcP8PjUu6c~KnQq0xgU>Ry7*RU?}#t+hxQd#j5Fz*SH$>@e~_pA z$bEg|7ImtSmhw*EB;PTnVwuoXflAyBoZ7crYu+r=|#s$-U^)JyJq;D zd9~m6zCySiIK_8qUUS81)fQ&Q*9p9l5b%Ct_MiA9SO5Di@qf`jDZcdm(3{CKK31g( zRN|WVq<<9OLd8F78NzTqaFT!TWkz2$!;QcxzD3PPPKCb1l?mU-yrKBUEPmdohH>u& z)UUKcp5ogu*Yr+Lf2c8za652{@3Y%4Tb`-&=`7$XCvb{ybmwxHI+pmP8_BzYQ+)r5 znSW)}jj6t~P|-g$1*QKK--b;-dH&~%TPI1s9(WUR!TZ^1>vC*f?kn@e|AoA1oxgwf zZKc}3EqUHSxEb=~pW?T!&&oz#EJwH%IQe(YZs~E}SdZ*e*@2UPRrkE^yK>ix43c*O zC;v)UzR)uF#x-75rxnKXfQO$5WaLP~1 z##8G;8J>Xsk`ufe`@>g-FGuzms)@_Eelz4~ewy0xVY^`Zt>BGHa(%}2+i^Vse*D!^U6K1|1nxw+X?_3D zaOS@oad89hu&d`;4Z{^nWd54LQE>s@oAl#-6Bk=rpY!_dz%@l>99}g3=NgZn9@n*>$T-ez z5c?NHM|{k{o2?z47K!#1`&2#hPJ?mO3f{zK-AhFIMma_HNAQgp z&lJc59vEWEnk6bqP87WIyen zjNsq6v$A=i_?&#QpY~4{@HfAx|8?QGoP4sM_D^>3_iW66ph#>^KG{$ECl~l(&zpx8 z)#l^}?w>Rzq`#l`D!!$d!k;hB9Rl}HUW!8OtMu4+7$9#(DR6N=E1CW6ZO8D`opKzG z?<=1#Nyc+zp;rzkg$W_{5&De@lCQ+|G^S7FrE{;u6K=@!i*|z_exd?b;K}>^@vSlA z29qvC zvN8^xKRT4k?KdKy%3t@FaQr53#YypSV2Wkg*QuYW~3=@;Rpt!01U^=mpEsQ>Eg8M{fpFa3vN zO)2>{X!xk4=KcCnJ%lB|J`2j5+qc#GotC6;7X)8DM5G{}bT?gE((4zNxXK7T6>0vT zeu(FO=#Za|blz`;XYn{@B0moCey%Tdp2tyLUdF+V{_w+GZ91<;lbG-Z%$Wc2Q*QeqfUVc2}Q^8w)GpQjjKOOnh z&Q@+{5m0^t@JysrTK_tV_XBkW>A&Nsv~%r<&E^=W&z0CZ968*=?upML#%Cl2r5duadOi355M^*@gRNVJQbc9R1AgNKY5`|9XF zZwrnOk8mTO+D*jt`@5OE$_t$8z3@-vD)G20DoVe}FYV~|ohk0Z?)*?jX+Hd&IG{tH zB%i(9YGJP(aWX>hr7E${QxD|ZBgBNgR^*etQxD93A1Vc|vIEy*Jec{;&-r;fb^)jH zqC)egUhafs1uo@ceECuSj?0;Ud%!kcxFh@cb?yG4FdZ&)XsIMk;WzuE=123w~Td88>Qo zYMlEDz9`34J`flAMn$ATt(S2iIZE9v_2$`Qc88xXVj?v zqedl;Y|Ea&@YPq&^Bi{Q`S(eIyiN10fAqiU>)-Fc^m(B#+m&#*TfN5q@kH2H6!uX{ zb>e%ELeik&eUnUmMkWpFJILB+c+#lK;Bq?+Rb;&Cb@^_^z8$r5^wRi2Y0fw@I>|aZ zsb%6w-xomXK^Cqr1^W8+Ec*QN)@QUIs8XDj^+o&b`CHVC33Ez=L_4SbmJG;m+Pi+P zlHryh`K~W!ZRPUXs?rbI4+$$$?>v`}15WpwpUA=zRgeAA{d?woc0Ub zuedu=#qey{?EvrTtSNlIR;5Kg?I$!`QMM+xF9SH;uW!0JBAeTn4V?DltMA=*h1;jC zCjF;zbl-+=`*8cxARh(h(tMZtctj<Q|qXcDU{Gz9$`gz4!U2xt;gvU^m&H4Sv^8Zw$)qyiWl>*`u!^<1_u< z5p8bgect2J9^#w9Pdqu=uF-|sAAC-p0)F)cUzN?}oIJ`6{q!7U8u)kC_KyrcCl~WU z0`42>Ih#!I6~4ZyF2{RHO%dYMfoZR-c?(lHqBCzj$>4JN0Q1 zf2~3KP5zBM^-n6dKO1`Ez>DfSPaVzl)BHs8+kbd>IImxN4k#J&%ZL5>G1u=vz82+V z&-u1zB&(k^;N)M$b%WbPF+2k}jqedJi_B9q+zdP$Y22z$^TjaxwY8=HH2%M}_V)f* zhNq<>e&CJORvVfJxNkhnc@BuiXES)4e!u@~Ui1?MF2N5TpOeAgzP(tve5u5gso)2X z&#B;VT)$nJ-w`sNLQ-;4suq5RqfjsTi zq~UMQ7tb+ykT2v#zozjfp+;^0?|DwvxOOMpB2bBI)8+HXn!3`TAN~y68R4rx!i}Tl zz9fxnOH%i34P&?oa#W79*5i3fhFgJC`CSwGcME5@9XO3^ z2JrWH+FLZY=X+DI?nr1X*JT#)g3S5*k>{0Z_-Dpp}yQ_u?OKoA6;UfC6(zD_GJd03#BcS{Y}XDbpPkR z{n$ZC!+jeue$~GAn6v+)Z6xEd|NATTlpn45Sr9~f&7LXsYN5aHsQ6+^zqG`YSD>Fm zUNg7Jk2Gfqc^mR++&xwM4TweN@1>R_T z>E?VtnV#z*{PMuYZ8)xLEaPTGdS~SvUu%|^s6Ty$K>c<0HlNSsEs(PzJu~T{J&MU2 zgX*`#cV`0LxM{>8_f|dy!A|)A?SlzoS|EF-#6@Kkq+FHBkJ8{pyO+eq9sk z=dOrFAJgyFdHpDW8<8e&yPO=OgCR%+Ur{bF9v1MIzB|}L`{*R)?;ofaJ9rJ!lz;L4 zY8`Ml@U11r+xUL98|~i<{8WLDZqt6Xm@m?{OaH08D4I$?^W0pqkM=6LJ!bT09eBx~ zjA)E-`o{wk@;%$6-jiE9E~hgezdx{t@E(oK>!@7{oSu`hL(hik+Qz)SP=6+Q$I;gw z>IXue`m+b}_iO7?xPBwzMe>77-2Npuc}+7JhYe+GM{{{vcar?7PhKg)bTUGI`yr=8 zydNFkaxfftZtcYie(LJ=m*{twQkz_l1-BPF_;)H)dqjKZ#24iofV+_U#%ySy;%RSTTPbNvokzm*#uY|Z<-333#lvFEQJ=KVPx z?*+4hH`ADZEbp(17`gr-`9h;Uj^g!Whnx%P?AZe!^YbI~O4+}%(XP*w>ED63pR6GJ zqV}|&#O?P0*EE;@C*54%nx8+Zi%I=t-$~E%k$k)`K+c48^|+@lswaQ_K))4u>q~!s zL;XzP)c&dc?#g@cUEcm&kfZwB`Ly*FUVk3o-s;lM!SC%G!|RXqYf%5IXJ!1u^=n#4 zzp4Ec+y3${Z$I>28JdqQpXIyC>&F!|o=#s>OwZ$Eg?@^k@}JQqxV#Ct9qEhox9W2H z49IsOy-}=i9QU8jJ!rlc>@wj2jz?{^^UqG8NwwdGKXj|8p=G+8I~< zo2bpXzc93v@uBBzAN{)Ul{!mzR&*hse3%J1-Cxw1>HF^FgWX+#E3Lp6hz#F#a#q17 zt;;C==iXvGwgac}*l<$Tqh^{;rIQTNo|5xQd5Xu3k&$*D z55>FEACkYfxc742AM|*xhUAT>Q!a6N9psHjTd1bb=lz}LXAAJcjSiRK{oRIqs*i8~ ze%K*bs*NgIv;5|*bQ78{9--3Kvf7CfJWL92=(|2eoz7IYt@R-Nf8C3o| z?L9H9esbP3W<`IVQsw0P5zsH@oA{d2e+A|vFZ6Xk?=j~x-$Vw_H;UFWK9@gkSdPXq z1ulR5q0azb`%?|4^YMb#UlhOT=jXKGK+}qes_@m5_NAJ<@%k# zy-4RA-uVUhUlA|;O2zYm57oc1(}TX;KR5JJ{XgmbK^-1HCvY#)hTXaq;r?0N zf#t8CRb@UeU)NT~hve0h(%$3pRR2css=EhF;PJ5_pX$HC*av5MeCT->8+a!+uHV7q z<3zp%=QY+DCkj(P^!E?oZlt!F2fOk9XCwcCFI^a0iO-j5cu$-T^|Ug4xRJ+K@t*Ww zhctOYtJAce5c3s{FE;cqBX~P() zFQwv>bp;u2LO#tWM@%Q@7XmKc$7RQOO!JiuF{ zxQK=#EK|V`9>>$czw>UJWAtnbNr||6urA65ui>CFe-{Hm;8|E#>f6cq6m{8Z&~~uE z?ZD%K&*(I(U2!IF#eGEr@VN~RH!Hz#8mHs1kM!h0?fZP3ONE>R_y=c84Cd`L9XQRi zW6G%NuzjMObysEI=9jppRXx`yGkr`?@qZC7b$jX8|KD|&9&*9!E(O*Fga@yyk|AdV z@4wbf4)B84O=-xdcJ^QErVQ|c*G<{THzN&RH|fwW$^PJVkG6x1R~*vdb&nbOR3E|X z9$MFs{-AY@$^rTR*Sdn_`MQGlmkj9ne~n9N;AJBX9+&hVNPqupT%vJ>>VV?pXI zH6kfbkUq|L!%iFc7g7elp!){0f%Bc%S95{CY=5n6+UMi^;Qc-?_&+Mw+|F&jwv~|a z)pV3`i0J(JN}6tj|Hc_|KBoG8V0>7L*RKU~RDaG|?ZSEexr5{zf8Dn!mv=&*;@f5I zCq{~|DBpQZ+UEwZp6_eJ5s1IQy~sCuB(GkheFs$xr~N|3N7BEyI`w!R$#5O=4S!1c zCUuj4i30A6f20lND-04hf?sve)l0N)P~Z~w#DQ-CuURSMhG?_{UY|DDZ3pjZn{A8f zzL)fIz5@H2F7TBFbo+w$lLbGd{=r}Q&ZPUaZY2Hw`h^{uPBK0}ef{oAzMmUkQuv!@`2cCQB+X3r$Gu9(yU-xnKl-xce zLcUM8|N1Lm?-cyk z9}f?3x?ioi`}#+Go#>hpI9~lWzQKAv-WY=L7bU0k3c$O{cu_nRC)@tc+q(%k-LHSU z_UjLM`5NF>q*G5GxzF!kXuP!pZxu6t8gI{r&jao6v3C4^Zl4EoWS?&D@QvKQEZ}5c z+vk@9&PQCpHD>AOFN3cP;{C;de5&t%E9$TC--l!&{wDAif0MqH&fCQO5B>hZiTTX} zz7_l*W_aPi!Mll?91)Af|k{ZRaG*54D)&#RriB<_J+{;%$QK=Bvje_Rt8N4n3+0x!zB z^(OUEQMR~*eZ~)E{Ky~8$1*Mw_uUr`l;zn_?t}V|JMr<;0zTQRGxs`4_W1l!X5EtZ ztpDPlqeADaZ|%BA=eY0l9)a^H-E^wt6 zcrB6PyLN6|SK`35-Ton1ly7++Sbm$fW&YhgDDP>(73J%?OMj{SjVssvkmv4+=Y$)9 zQ~Bo16?2-5Zm|-$(gK{G7kay2$DO|)c<2wcPrr)dL(j{tFVL`_cn>7xRhC%!zC0)N zd}8eFiD9@K`KH0L9?GuV)h3qV^j$2Huiy5&Yh2!o_f(VoG{@Huqquwz>AxNNd-TYg z#_dx8HzKWgYsYL}z6JTDzucH*d-E{;_A&CjFWx2F*^y=$clmhfguJ_l^l#w6CIS2R zZr~QQzxkugt@wE5B^>WBiT|h6PBkmv23*lo`q|;4y_EQU0L7o;X9O>$*hgRU`00>O z{LtUsg_umM;7NlKD_jYmnZOAA8-gFl&P-d z@pD6-%8%-;E5q&c0w+7~*Kfa-m#>%<*#CNG{}`}d(OClPx9#ipMiuKH3gAYh%5uG@ zar>Pp-vWGQ+X)?b|H?x7`ID;;ZF1qMIY&Bop&~rE5LBebQvGAZ{VIsMYw%B$Qh9?xm`AmzWd;}5Be>@ z)1E)ATZrlRV*IuNe}9dBdSQk;kx%!(O&(90T!i6PjLUBD?hh?etSH01$oCAv{P1a! zzlt$j@rm@C?mt|o`hFzd=aDo1VZA}WleyTpPC|tB4Q?1J^%|k)WRvP6=zYz?e>xwr z06$zNc3~uww;|sJJsppE7SVf_#d?L-Z#wXtNVSJXepuWh?Vx`-Uqf*Lziqy|6HCA^ z#*efi{+>b7k1X*28Dq&?(nw61`t(OCz^D02*H^~x`k*n#OBn+B!hdUm)N2CoVISpR zZ-FOp8}ey>dpBlfOlgMG`he=k*;Cm+S|`g9^0Yp1Lr;|@P4?10fxx}UHw~9|v_E+E z>sTgF;~U9$uB5&eAW!Q9$e+Ib>(eMEZ|o=i&l)E6f3Yw!AGc2j+=BGr#%gw6z76?g z-|(9^4)XJJFU_wwk9oa%-EV4Ez7z6pqz`YMJVX0r!hiCQ%AY#2#V+ojF{u2~6_!rq z`W5}9e>$Ws+bJe-`;Eva`)i$i_X4+{#&3#G?}hJ;0w+7yJ^P_P zFQ5D){euc6+~)d?82_mK_}=gR4fl`qDh5bD|6Nz73zzqzd>!yY|1Lhx?K2{u{4W!E zdlk3O8&v*~4xZP%{a7GxLwfVeenuWY@{h_NUG+xAfbvm)H2+O__+ul{`x%%x8UVd{V5>-z%}v*9v>s*sr(t2vQKdPEWjzwjcOK5=jH1#FH!xh z>%4TQinVVWdTt=3m6reU}RxCQt>#h%qGz;T*iVPE0lSqr#*Hpn@V?)~g| zzJg5NOZ^}C>n5l67h<>qxEJ_}SH~Xn{WZlP={Mb<-b~nYk?*fLF@Ea6t3PYOrZR8F zXJyvQ!28Fc zf!7fkzUzMPv8Eb7-tZsIit$Y|LXNve%v-k4U-ipv{`Er7;Qeif^Z8dXSo&{;o_vNg zw{n|*v#hcl9r%`-mak(iev@+k5%VuS51;|x2>$lb$7j;IkOchmX|%k*rTNqf{;>_+ zYUMQ&Q>MaSPolKL30~@ZdFJE;&xhy4s~$vO8DBnseXwi|@u!fd{SzI&(>riO6J3Nw zk_GO?eWqrJjLTDfpK~gP8}S^50r-u$8k$Jp!k;YIr5h#fG=UfM!IflMcgxb`xiiJf zGE(xb;O|pyo0i8&Oqu%qhkhq`5$|37G(UKL9QkxkdGgw`dK!jj0jKsp=)$E&1sG22 z4U#|bVUzUeH|;%Vy8E_^)CZZbH5#N&3@$#s>d)Cxi$7_~ZN9B)=qk(oQZ< z`w=AnJnqG5{(OcD`gPDhyVJ;O+&(*S57Ix*kDDCJ?8^$WuVcooS9A_1>tFgs{*PbP zs+^k1YlcbOfV5!IzJu~IoaQSkzu^5sKXd{_mA{iQO@?a4vI1Li86jBq+gU-beP*`MLya8;eh#7c==R+ zR@hfOwplM89~b1Q{MXL5R&JjMIK}ztpsCe(`Ly1k`26u;-6R!jzgdviSfw9N7IhlW z?Xv?n03WC<(TcZ!T5phlzf`&UkjLKyIV;j*v-%y($I91`f55+s?AI_q!wraw3;6rz zzFMtexCiaq1H9_GUhnhg$LM~Z>?^*r(OPa_7UVP|r2nH=6q*z8d>8Z^fREdcm$mit$;@FK*1^bbsptZ{oup zg^NLt7;D8P>@kAx0q^efrH^&2JjF=qrvmfU;%k*xlx4VUv>eBE&~xGR+=l#oQ3rV= z(gmjmt}O?7VK2>ZHtfS&!0UW3dVG1E-^`qUa$67B!2kJ?YEuPG4%Po3!4E#qaDlH| zz3fWGK)U}NCipxp3$^H)Woomt_D5a4o>yy#_2KG;qfB52` z^ZQ9Nh= zIc1vlStxW4(|v=nJgtZ4Dq8-jdR=Q2;dbD(9=`hW)#kBJ$9@f5=>ksY zIo}N)kk(vx|9iseJcr7!(5FeW3)L3qC;eGL<0XUuK3~T(l$LSYKs{vOTpg(87`J+u*zF$cDHCE_x+-mGqn}oD%4|e2dO_ud= zxA>B{Xol1LMDj!3gI9BTT0fEe!<8fQ^8MN@=r>G}`l}RO*oNEZ0j?P%<8boJ4WoGZ z2IP}|!>iO4G0Z+X&oT9p`roN|ZV*48wnE+xe0+&wCHeWZo%925vi^RoN`}YZUtGW` zzF!R)?~Y{Un}BVfB6%)DkRBNFPeUFb z6Y@!Zw581{9v_!<$h zL3|(Y+}(%ASCcILqxcS(cWVUqpWD6N*aZ#!@g((TVG2cFm9{=)=(UP9^K+&=P;)>r8R=0E2C zYsR7ekuDjc9n9@FA)ov!I^wqzxz<0*FZ*-#4|x3Skf-t&Wj1hd`&^_S^}o5S@ii}> z&U2{$Eq**AhWEcL$W#6HP92z!o|hEky9c;ty!3OW>XTJ}^Yb7pa1Zc$o$l|; z&-y>D|HwX1a^9xgzAVUTK9&9#E4CsJKQGEc`!oPII{p~L&x>5B7ZdPWUCaE=&x5SU zr}LZD^|KvjHpZR$ZtvBdA zr%v6(nh{nx!20VSdNmWI{}bJ|cU26h^Be>4PfRPSL^9ljeA85#Uq)s|0T=5PI?u@> z|G@vDUzOU$EEwpKaK3A@)Mp3(;E=4jbWTN5Vm)X={H@@-!GETAWfV6OQ>KFN!F)~q zB@6uIpH}I_d*}J(j}O*Iy3b^M{<-(w$dcd*+=P6Z-!#4ZDd}8D;IuxV_5YB@L(cR4 zPFf$>p+|Ax$y~ml?LvOmG#QVLzZ74<_oHe2C;5}h=RM@|IqL(+pPM&+GT(33Oq71v zfwzBjFoN5ch4KyHJ%7~n2`}G-e6p|5x@V91ez*($hy3qRvTn~vos6=GkCn+snyZog)d^q=IT%iL9R`)U5B_&hv$ z`fVN`Q;>Y6E@w`1`>epp&Xh-wy7BUJ>JRaMVf|$`*RR3&Nb#Gw`OBBwKho<#IbW1r zqU7=}vJa^%@543RK8-EV|Hei3tmgK)g3A9mX-Po)F+kpgv~Z^O3XdQ8mxc28t~mBy zK>4T_n*VHXeS4JqXNO)F(pBAj-{)lQ$Af&Tzwi6s{*jkY^+)mP-m7g4kB??DwSW0M z(t-wqKjHQnfK!~uR$tJJmrwI6)lcTgQ(MBBeJ03Tk&dfUDd0RS3-;TAZ~xQu9&i6S z^DEj%!ACb&^Zx6CoCj&;Pp@9&=S5bE5Ad50W~upksU7vAnIhw0NT}P3p9dL$8-QEB zEH;#%2j$GKurJ|A@%!996XdK&i$t}!!_SLcRR6$x)ZcKT0E?do-__owVLiOqc%eYqa+W-_O<|-#c6S({ucSFQVCc zhsJY~zxVXVLR_BK8zkTBto?$D$=jgc3H|+dFaI;ZKEjdC|J}Tsm+ua;Z%W5ux)`RP z)*Ix1SgX{okqq}jUNJ-Z|HZGRUdi4l+ZXxg1TTK|%1YcnvY-4LJ}kQ&*KdSg3+dl7 zvnaRUhJ2FWaj9_zx1Z)KichbLEvNGMxP#<}?;H0!x6ccl?2LaqX(KN`$3Mj1y*T1C zuAkN$6u+s*PCw%QkzQkpj9<-V&(gWP4*3?O^$*x0xqUX|lmFjm4(!V9qxA-r-@8zW z>%9FqA@4@IWpl48JbvUKm49PLlh*;|qh4vf(P_3hf%~VJDgDwRjaZR4p#2$5N>*xKv{nL7b{HwpY$XFhK9psEiZ(aSX1V1nG!fy-kcTY9m z#LtTqz-_>LA2)x^&x4$3zfRz<`=77E&x2^aLH2!dd+>N}pBr*sq>)*;pahKjL#PE>Rww^x-jMeF~8VpzQ+Bk z4ZN0dj;VAmM6-sdPYw7^@VcA+?arSU^dR4e`KnKa7iHM5T^M#DZ?-o->IxiCT=Bx*B-)sP{Qtbn0%j(EdndY`0Fo7SDr$bCRO(;M3Ji`Y5 zghyW$D<4SrpXUUhX9$Wo=g`1D7v#N21uo8Wvf1ChxGFQ1@;#d$34-r>Xx+E^e2wMj z#Q%MMMCs?Cec*k%bl&3a_Iiyn)Q^z&;>JV1weCiDvELmg6yp;1rUjkLB!e#~{1`o5WbVRCT!;`d3x<;!v-6seHQMrxiV?~C+vWjwea zzPN@NkuT(hUm5U=zB6FDD4(a6`okm56Xf|9eYY^Htb86wU2dL3WfiP9mxx2!r;=|h zE5AeUM0suE)V*olMiPRrzaj0l-jb;Y{L%~VmY{uC&i9^^_F1ONauoBVpC2#2S6Xc( zrc6bD^uiwlcn|+n9i;c>3fzKx8XtOB)@taz&cZ$|e(z|%Aj`FZf3|h)0lB?THyQ6| zcEe65_%|M%*_7M+bm@K0cJMvmN1Sc>xp<#0uRmc=aJy01rT-JZdcQ_)@6)CF4b&5% zup!O{$cr{7E(`wVe9>-_kuNwtJEF`j(JrXJMal1wRJIp>9r-`>w>0Qm(_>S`D4$MV zo@kfZLH#Y0m9JNX$0o$c_EJC?naDuZV93@`b$c-%vpMN4((o7iay)_n@@%1N%M6 z$2FDXXIv02%A?C?hsp$87ZnRl)$8SVy7 z?Q^Z+y_ey@Mf+6OknyGXdBHEae{szS9a-|GJPUBe*V50!&3=uc{Trb#INk>ECR$!= zM86D*cgT2R0{?uCy1hidL-g5xc4(cX=)%LaKW$A!PC9SXi^@9D^w^5Id*-SHmn ze`I~6;63_L|9HA7=|x6@?7KueiSH%(^nG0QZ8<(4>l-;W%HpTx{3H13JtbeiOzMwY zAmcZ$$+NL^en$d=pV>q5>HD||;Gcf@;*V$}F=Z zr3n2Le=p*12EWm$ZCh!7lJjZaQbT_V_!pbhzMac^;6wU#8u&YUyge~^-V)Gvqcz8d_>(L(u0{^V|v${_Yw0H(w zMf-1buDPgUb#s_Sl7;;V4jC`9zi)-l&nOw50-VOVB_-zf4`+BPa2n?-XTQ6N_WAtr z22S70PRHK~DJ}b}Y>I$O@b$oH-Ie1=V~GcNDPL;j%O0fePP zj`pSZ=P6&VXzNOCgbzOXuuR~zFWuqq4_ZAby43&vGofF-MEWxbPA|%PKc3QNp`N88+Ciu~5H~Zz)hw_8RBkfWduf(_k-{jMV z@`KkI@!;#nE!F2&2d+oOyhr1as9U=H>pW@~kf(Vs6@PQSnD^Ys7dpf^XT~^3_g@KD zNSGzOqkI&I+r-o z{fh(lF&6NzHSPH@CYLx;+%v(qgFoQuu|cu9#F6~vaS?G;K+cVn;+TcMIbXz4y{}Cl+2Hq3=!*uIQlBgS>x0oreG`ZE z=js$(p9A_XjXb<*T+4obvHwe7pMHtfr2g!qs=iXVzD($AaCqV$m-g26j~7B;4D6wl z>>Sm9sP99ifeN|4xNl_Kmgbw=x7y|heT16-%f7__hrcP%_ecCB-z)DIjUs)qu#Zx* zGx3wbKKllZ;SuEaWkBDWJ$cp*-I?JbeR-je(meRPZ=&x*<|F$IVxM~rh@XCi^mo^y zrIp8Yy|#q(kv){=#4kyFKz8^*UcubHWaw*r|L=jfdTB3_zCy5vQhLYKNMC)7@qLW8 z^o@GFs7L6O^4p*nqCd=4WDzF^pbs)lAR;_kFxq)=V1)+Tj!L1H@VU(BkJ(4 zR-w;Vo=P!M&JV^%a{Pa|cgyQAr>_M7cYPyqE98eqt-YsYxMxzJeC(wvh5&iUWoJqK zPp1F0C_o;#_rAnE|8Bb%&h%#iPYaXlfw8J-0^d5w(o*Mqy(&%0I&P4 zM(^ZfxC=Oa_fb1~S8ZNDR>;wJL+3s|SeVz39XNgWvq|Zt@9_F@0jKYN&WJ8Oo!5^C zxOIWFe?_^VwuX+6#fYZ8v`8`8DUOy(_v=08G z&iShnv;cdw;}x!$yI6XZ#M+ochk zl?=B6r}lYfd*y-Q47UfB-}t+I6(WH9)*CtR)3iO4R+YG zf0?cNKguINdv|fJ4=#_}my#{x;DY|9Ra=)-X8m_Oyx_$b-TrSlc>eld7Z{I5Z5ls| z0M5&!@rzPL^Y@B{=>p5+e6r63{i9A_E1#Qv2H-ZNOBx@FRWbWq$fx)%I6mWSWG?oZ z{*m!Wm@4mEmQ8x{zEY#4rr}S8ztldmpx4lK#+Y#M1g={j7>|b|=fy+-=l;=rK;P$T zSGmjNFynv6gY2_F|G0nqRnE;mBXB!X&A8^rRLnj%@+ls-3e6Z3$#C*7dy|ZVq3Vov zN}Y^@zx}5M`FFn4-f)KNfRlWQQgfF?Fx&{7$}iI7!T=R;9-s6mIp1b)ly+QR`c9P6 z5LzGfy)hf~ZW-QlUO0HXzFfd#F1Z|c(ndGf!^{XX}@8J-24mO^xvqGF;oSd*N+$SX*eGoG4$=zN=s;ap?J8Ux68Qkg~P!U z?Zu0HipQR9>%NF!xMG9!m*hX*YpbGSxDGhQqjNFk%t+wE-UN)hM)1h)PdgqR9t9o^ zI)ZP(yk#f5AXomf>L)eg!1-pZ0}bHY!7tZ(bn|FqU_AWxOqTPz3-#;#dtU&(%N0{_Id%c{JJ zP<{s1^&XlBz^^y8=g52*=XreGSm)a@pSi$KxLCYre$11NfRv(%`HR{@`F6W( zZ#wV|;CC+mU{En@C|?i00(=Yj&Fe?C*IGjPskm=dzn1l82Y-Ew`UQ)dLiuL!Q*eLg z27f@WKR1>zhVs?mr;nHSOIhH%H&^xjt|OG6hW!I0^y{|B_{`j$QlykFl%D{;27D9v zpFHe4<}FPqUkg61|83xVGH+ZetqA3(WB-QEZ(ZPb51ZJmOqPG|g_^(rTq`+jD4RTi+k8Xb+lKv{T zN`F5tUvft!TPQyjd}==i@GE{cwQpr>C|?hL8uVL;-`4P#-V(}JkHq~J_;&F7Jx`xj z#T3fVz<0i>{kXxex-g<=RbwbW4SZ@pS>W%EuGy-ZA(Zb3;_J4__{3h?HLstqJ_QyFSb#J|Gj^euDSSZQ$?xu+GbxLHoU8e>*v7f7=DV!gq=J-;s*=VV-Nz zd3TktG+C+-k4UZ#{8O3kUUi`cKj+hJm;TYXoN(Zzg2}6lz>U~1s{B>wFO=yy`c*mm zS->X@9b^x4zrk%Jk9oE6lOx@g40i&j^~*O?exDf5a5r$;51YDf`J)Jidx6t_*pn8s z`>7bN*dhI+^>F0z-*C>5Hkc40i*k{jlhtG_CS5+zXuc8;Z?)>CDS;3*w{LDdXTh zHlb}kR)0F=Q~kdFXG(T{hT9-d`)LK&Twl%W&jNW`KmOF`P+?wwHsG{hR_SuX2fY5A zRQ^iYKGlicf8zD$22T5B@3gg);q~VQPWxqBfB16{uRq22(r?-?dv?6@NM3(B;Ivc>NjS zpBubQFNPP@u=>$$ka45>t2}>kDPBKb$SHQoI5cWnZ+ZbHpR=Eh{#)aZIj?#D^^ktZ zUq5`fIoEGNz5;e$KKx)^KGyzhz{&o+zx-;>&u}Mj8qf0_HE-82Tu1UqKP=YeY(Zwf z7x}bbsHk*MUx?ufYX51{|6#_|(}jWi)`OA3>r)+gyKU-eMKF$vu~uAyAG|&_g5UW< zjf|qHa@><_$q!ziTESobo*c># zUY{y{ka4ke{-{ccgiwC)`qTja%Tg16D`^hp2d_^p;BV00oLMS9lpnl4wS%8pD81}k zaiRR+^{E^Dk5}KGU0NT?4_=>Ufo~eNW=a`tC_i|8s{2vKr(+SrJe@j}AG|&_fxmmY zW=GlVkoi9{cztREf8p8smU5Y){NVMe3;dI{N)Iic5y}rmQe(?I#3jXBr=N?pcgz|&er%v$qzTIP;J|&bN zygv1S->&wMAytw?`N8W`#UANz+|VieswRZ;gV(19@H-SXU8-gdh|4 z_)vcE`qU17J@0RsHR3|~!Ru2u_y?Chd|p!@$`4+jW`XaRz3V_NZ74r@eX9FO#%J-; zV-F1KK)!gcgVv{fpI@;>Hny&nRex5|b-nwRtSm~u4SB9)1Cv-W4{7tOotPE~b9FkFH6 zXU2hd=UR3<{<}&u@{RZ8{A>QLy_25L7yAquDBpnR@{_5&Pv>ZIc`iT7u~h1z=OrEB zUx;h_z1kQUccGu2`_IDj|LNd=6SL1Hem}+IEBK_}1AaF6@!H3AVsxQ=((eLazgNbq zaI4$(Vl|=s;C5pMKXG~90peK$ZjZRHap1m&@>9U~QAPbnBy^MU$Q+H-Q+%Mn#3kx4 z1AJPSRUf>pU6{oW`|)hx6!-P(cMYTG*!=bHmi|!txU#)XFEx{o15WF<%a`t~k7l?T zIJKYmmzSL%!|-I_w60lIxzom2hC6`Mx+U@G3wxe7xKi`J+=pJOX!Wkbcm0|)cH)p> z=NF6r`|JPHy;P})KNER4^6Gm3V=LS~dcLuC-5EbBt&;4=gY3K2F7Zq_!?pXRev(&i z-}qYu!{dOHecu&Qf23kKjX%z9a(}Snx<*x%wm0P`L!Ry{b}X*cAe`Y2;1s_~rRz11 zU^sm*HVwSrp7mLxVmOsg&x7vKt|-dO&xRcJkNAtdC-U;OzexY7eINgQ>jPeX2IS+w zE3~T3<49J%Vv+2ZUA!0;X1J~MFYzjp@|yUy*) zhF!_v)#&OdqK19qJ|Y9{(~LMfz&k&E`n71ZGX*ZekE8xXDfrnHM{lQbhxnrXr=kC6 zg7<3Ir#tdmB*R~R(EOx5Amg$7_JrE>zA4ft_%wge{1gZN{z>`H=Qjq9?}AVB2hC3j z;AgEhMTp<0hLLh#%JtLy98@lpj1lWrKfi&+TR6 znKN#WSl0y4Pr_U=Z>3>g(I1rYG9wkZZylqwvcCmCD`=k6d*3{t%72GdL@4lG)Si-R zm$QfY{1BIjPw?-s+$g71^><;;zgA@9uRvg+`l+DW%@zs1J$05r1u=0KV zAS`>RJXfK4FixY@*Dxk|g?&C;sY{oB(eL1%Uw*kawOfIP0vB=57$)WEcOCIqr*&*_ z>1(A@Y55ee)2={oAkeP+SffIeEpJNf}c4Y{x6Z` z7{D*te#t|Xj}wkK0S-QyjW{9BOfqRj5={I*x6v`L4)h_QBs9eK|f*Yt@QJw<7$4tgKfZ=x;pYJS{tL9do z2Dl07pg!|zs+qq=#Dm(u4ZP%)rc=@A-(Ab=T{=kA?dc-rV)Xs&B7^i~U zzsUDL4~}v@kk`?9&mYnsu1EA+E%K$j@7zCC-ha{Wz|+^szo$2wnaE{{9}m8Ln6%#v zeGd;8t)&zscKQ5_(g*2J0e^YjFE`K_Ln5M|8-n_ITA;m=!S>n@$#vPgX9sSi{zdvk zoP+IEAC_^M^6l!bs$A+N*xoqs&nW&*jU>fLMZE;uDbDu5ST~c4|VrG{>a>@eWzw+gPT?{t~X(^uu-1W88^YgS>)#-OuLOugH z)!WjR*`KK1$Va5-mHi_H=blM@UR2@do?4Iei|$YEd_Df#FyDS5l^+M3?w`6;x%8Hj z;b!1;|I(vLVs<#glYx_eW2#m>7r}4`aJs*&sor`;1ze1e9z4gK4L{SsFR`>up~wVj zC;cn|2tZdXk9UnN)2!57D@@Za*1HW61 zW=YX;p?vxs6zNX@ziIT@T`~Gle(?I-0e*M;ghjF1P=4^fW;*x_okcF>Q3vwHxaP#T zM!yrw246%(v?l|`6FMi{H1mZu%qHW-+jIPJ8K>>5tCr>WlL^SD_H?_!(EI#;G6guT zBir?C`Y?j&PX$in%$4ZwHB}7PqCV*yG_jlWVOZ)L`!XR<=b-ocOc&oBS&@ z=H{7jhUO4f$l&&u2EMiVlU3^EK)$FieWqM5W`g&-GwgV@k0&l(pBC)jF0>4ZR9fHQ zaVKTGsQ*`OTjgjt!_B}+zSEZIPx<~)GH|NT+n*&B=le$)D5)~^IKfP zzBI^FdzwD=n_1xu*TXNW??G!1B=P#n4l3U&*E{if!zk3Nu-Epld|wTB4o7O8ge^P*}PfNd5%io>E{fR?9#lP0R*a~XqFFnU? z%_HRpJuUkI9}kT99y2}na47Ts+Ay~as)!fKJ5bJ)zqjvIGCXJh75LuP7d_z&&pq+YDu!#%NV`csc~}EuB*Rnj`zXS{ADh)E+@tVc!hSR4Q^0$8 zrQ=T#3{MWyZ|!_6Ld9?wexF79M|97M2=~6xp9Xn5cpo2qdv658GlKMIPp(&41ze0T zX2_-C`C@v$Casw6x5$9j?Y}RMGQp2*=+$P(_)NK?TO5@o?V^8${&+n9=Kwz*{8ulE z{j7!^oUg<4Epgx{gMYc_m7k*#7vhWfYNpEZAq(eVt?Q2ckjFm*^0fZgIPg#=k3aR3 zZ18H;oB4{zUo%bWr}*o8MHlD#wP&UOaY(CO3SSn<>W}1Uz9=~E;8$GU47p^apDTOM ziemB(@E3Y$@ABX*tWc0rT@GI}kO3!Bx z*Gf3S20{&RLT=x;=JB}l)0N%|%gaM7Qr|D}RQ z&yy|G?S4Pftq8aTKXW+dFYwbze^=w>DCi|2-k-d$<^Eiguss)*%s%}E=^wS{uzBBh z;r>y7iU;raDg(E0|ERx`|8w@wD9-h#K#t<~g`-17u0H{ID$;MR&iaMLC#OGTlfU4# z%Ad7K9po=>-_%|+N&j^HThUI6j7$Ze_S5M+M|)AmV?_M0S~2!OzKCZ!+FLw$@x@=Q z)v)$T&y~@9{vvwR$6?ST`)2(~wVbZ!-1q({P4o04Moz9~yp)V0dRh9!2!F_5TAyF} zbkxsb&?E2!l#_z=%$S+|dH+pCKDCdD*Q@X1{g>j94&M8vJl|9Q74=8sWgPHKq$$-K zxTAvn5&ZO#vj4b7$#t^&vW!E_k3VbGh!giO8S#t*Z}_^6#|yCfPQZF90l1-wHnJeY zQ;<*oJ;`76+d>T2N63Cj>$gQk`t{@MsdUKGdaT~I*cg6)l^LXeNAI2eBW%(G5r4H; z`bTkW>-wdkis7k{*Mrxq$o3V5VV^&~xUY6#9UKo{JIx2nieQ~9OY^TMa@Ny@1LLv6u^tc~PfqXddH2lr^V&Bb! zd_nWYCCYF>_G{X=cc;kqcWOwDOI()tnjpUBn)Flm;QJ4hD4Pu!_~g5j>u@|1o&;r$M~`%2 z=glty{DiPk@cAXJt;{0e}CjB{$BJ1 zl$Qp4T%(2E>AmQpAJVxmou_Ajm%3y5MDaWyzXYGwcl5kOHuy)UmA8xM`S>OHA>-dI z8K3;NJB@OCp3fW9&&}Wqy`uf;@Lh3g|H)knX7l)`f*%jRuP8U=v>y@QV1LuWZ_wlW zI*~eVy_|o8{mle_exr(IqC))*d5@ z;J$G|X=i_nxM+^bcC9HT*FXPWxxP;c`vmR=->Q`Ms6Hz9XE<Y?liQ7F5FedbQGALRIRTj~`wQJ(QwpgoCK{!o!Uq8@_FGeQ2R8INYtm`Fv6IE9qw zFDG1KfSeVnli4BSl*az{+tpi+4>W!#k2@-d>10U)&jg>ww-2t?=&EG6_j4&v{j>Tb z`(o;sLY~Gy(w|q+$;{iQ{*H`OJklyftEJKSBI<#@`=$n-fYdv>;!nBEV^Qh(r9HGB zNdbS=?loDt%wr+_F%5i=@sL5xV>$Kd`@g7XS5Q4?f-fTG^Ebj>O11-fzV_6~YJ~+R zE)kEozofquuW`@!3}Eq6(syVt?n%{&vd2dcUomL&R|d$3B}1N`PwkxNrY6I>=L5nW z!0EZ11^@n`z4+;wcY!O@fR`5;zN_oBxx=PaJ+@W+U)bj=Dc1>P-?D;3tl>t1N<16# z)E+(@wd!?*(GUCOsXfsC+0VBptPV51!D&7we7x?LFF9_$E8|1!affpB040-;1D=d@ z&GbKuhXd#BMGM@4wCt;oTB=~Dv__6+8SsbBL({;Y@|mUs&7;H@@iBv+37-0Ft93MA z30!+m+E4Ah{k%4L+5D69K2ECNZ}S!ZF=bi1eWDDXe3%*XRKMffJz6@x#x&o`SmMdR zseTW(op?5>-iZsql@8z)MTYOHRI&AlvA-ry75^9Z*>EmH=P%RNPpTYl6{y5BAfJi% z1^>Qh*zQP%o6tV!ezMWNtKakc$@tZB+@$&)dUJ5V^PzEn2iEVwb}1+M{iYc>wZETF z>^vM{6V^%ll7UlvmwtP=oXX~h{r+izJCIJh^t@yw!>zwc`>6eDimUeW{Sj)vwBN9( z!m0s$zk%8>;ob8e&Bt-={lNO~m}%~(biT1K8+OHk*R|68@56!f_L~8o89eUeye^!)?u=X72A&ZRKe?JpneaoWEsx_Qt_j$4xCdY#(m^nnx0^ZH57lJTYX zb+>V(n(tpZfYbQV`k&_iP~80G1E==YbdIeC?OzGp3_JsAOvNtSBbohi$j?Sv<<5lN zQ4F`if9(Tl=Y--%+tI#{&>x3<-84B*E#CdznP?`jz;n}P@Di(Dil%)+A)j(W&M)R> zvK<$>U~a(ucSA45H||x`0v_Kq=q39{Ryr5O?RNmrK>Anv6&tzzwBD!v&(1e?PUZEJ z4LR*Y>Hlj@@^$WCGVnOybymggj%EI*#ml&ufiEv(zMqHT^j#*xM^>45mg5e{W#T>| zymtHbd6|3~aJr93_+s>JIyVsU&1@&jCp+skIDCTJmks%J=j{{ESE0g;r@$%z4z<0H=1e{`$^=+`c%QoZpS> z<$YC~YvoF+FhB_ZGaygx^Jbd^5n>%AE`e(bO8c_G`=!_Ht5Fj6<5WM|$1)Bp#yL-l zb-uWSd>rzvA4)v~M}4ZM=cfd222SxQb!So?ddH~1>AP4|ey!#6-{$2zAWz@LD&FX7 z1}{GiIQd~Le}5D&UpG#!(@B5*8>1?5{oW1|r|-NJSsXo__H%@N&YAMLH-$m^cd>e_ zoOk*PT>Av=1L->x6Gzbc-tRy1seb0)u0NI6Pcm?-pIzn7ujTdQ08aDUrMD-V>Ap

|&1#LTA2FZMdYk;u0B_h13H$Lhw8IqeK1$s!&j_;_YX$Nme(T2&qvgbQ^0F>YwImOo>PBJ1->`DWjG(t(~(d8 zG3w;Cdwjgk1Wx^N&+~3g_;^J9k;*^u;`9JszCK&Vh5F-9?>aj0^5cP%A3L17uXy>+ z)3V;FeyX-_x{}8~1@dax`7&|)7#{yr;1vIH+wD(z{1bquBTc*ZeFN^F8u^(>Ys?zl zjgPnLf24oZJ|EosDvgh~>1ZE%@XorwU#ns5F9Yo&9(em#!wMB(cmndZJ!Bk;MpheF zkm1RYPXVvcy{+#T0?zxh7VDK%@P56T{<^RY9f|d)46N_c!Moh>a7GdEM1RaiKAji6 zl|FWIQHFc&$^Js?(ayc=%;on7asSGAk$jo*QC-5BycsyHFV~Db{T5$eCIhGOZSiqc z7+=3?NgnB){d4jaWBSvOPwUGreXkbP0vGX0!~IV-(hTqi{aCVnajPQW5`20-g1+yN z4gQ9wYf6={1kio^-QhX=ZS*@7{c{?eR?k8(NXsx2P_hRMS&&8iY-h}Uz(0Y4q z;m;@2{kXvOFQk8(TXNmn=H-v8BH*WA9`}=Uo|n|Kxk_n~g$dk-b3R(Hmz~+ZJ;zg^ zpY8`;&kr{YXYvWaQ<1L!>4P#63^$yX^EtIA>uSY8CF)s}Pxpg#KXf!E<4=A+ME8S) z5AOQB8pri7rT=8#nN!X~yg#Uc$0PlE^W~1zAAId4Xa6e`_9uW>Y1M*?5xKNSx*w!? zrhxzXnEj(w@LPdP_?Hg7Y2ZD)UVeEbix1roQh(Wyx7F-0hO1vm|0uo{ezWc5@umAg z>hHUL-k}a-@um0?KBi*1g&cQczk=G=%wi>%@%l+Y`P4p|B*$D0XZjP!KBQ%yUp_~1 z6aL2|KOO1L{978Tm^|IjWdeV{U}rPm4^h9C{?mHw&f@#EqL@6b!}Z`@ol~p0n&EUm zmo-S<_il+9QIy+nGt1vMkbO75zp#MYmjJyfNIQMkH=El>_iOZf?9*Qv{^jvYg=3AO4xc&-Ul#X9kr& z@4NVKc=>d{riXlZxWdTmS05(hLiQ&_&hE|aiw92a-3N&NqgDp` z*QdseyL|mm>q9EPyT-Vimmd##S|2W0**}q&p8%Zv*z=2aJTIT_*GT{1?`}Wi`pvj6 zq4-7r{nIEOzjWxQ_}O|+n9t*vN&ew{bZzU4v!gUJfWm*epHhd*I1Jg9@po?bQ)HhW zyc;bir;s104*z_bit^&YOKE5*NpC)$W(3JU zX+EMJA5WN@#4nXy`S;% zfcg`azeTrjHZR`+dFoG#zgqnvFFy@9`Qd)=?qps*-EUF-O`c##KJ^9pmG1GV-bY&g?d|1s{*Ku*(77 zoJkeuYgqeC!FZkq{6cEYGX)r)fqc5(IzRn{t02Smkk1D1Nw3lU3IP}Ed)hzIW4)k_ zlJWR_;c8Q1tebd$&&0Yb4!k8hmUb=zo)}*ekWc&F&T8Xo6lFNwZ_#@1^Y4xw=j-Ft zAo&_qM%%)fd^&Jizl|@m^)O$*WfG3@FY3pd{CzU26yR#L^s|4n;~R=G{d(k6f8JjI z>Ni^8{`)7aKjSF{|LW-X$`v;$0xo|4ME64p;O}|AYitQ)0A1m)54>k73#kMAGo^aJ zUD6Q97xB)-eNZ}hukPkCvhSeh+z-`*=-wBu$4_f|Yl%OFJe`jkO38iJ;wPKziZDvD z!0G&qe!qF8{MJWG_$hGfM^cXN7yduSzB@kYNXRm{apT5~#(`QDH||&$&Jst( zjT@`gxUqGlPPA5W#~rmQYPGR-P-omYYU8NI9XD#VKaP98l7r;;d3^aJ7w-9dz3yJG zd)@2qJ-PnX>oy{8jNpE@qO9;}_3IEpUV*ry6@EPA zhW=u;>a?Nx?ek~m@rV<+7v+*;YyPIV;nwo&t8_d<_NpRz|2rP;xker|zRZ3*^cleW z@|e9{m|!0rkI;Phd*Xo`QUSL^&I&zOJ|=2J|IqOW9nVx5krpc+&(QG*;ZLso+eO5^ z(C@0kufJ>!Pstr(${Jrca8(qyv+#panZGy5?4#oe9q^yl4z$p58N-dJr~SzKuLl+v zkH_Ni`$Sgo#v1bW4Hw#{;|cnm^QqUAI9_Js5{kKC-2VQ!E)3+2t|7pK#-@)a7f7?hW?$@l4 zBmd-4j+`d$*Jxd{gSTnU%7)^8kd9ZJz?IdG{3z}>Y5gWVHrn=+hvtW?*^ji3 zWByUaaQkWf-qxwu5pn-U>o@i9P~x=ZV*iYgr}g_yT(cWu`&Qs&XVJ&`n~Uw!ewg$} zrj?Nf=*NDT{F}@CWUuI7H}sQ#7yb6(j_6-6*@yMu(FEz_oc6=2T-*=!Na$-E z%v^Ck)BUv`;Qzhd@JXD{k|^GPI{(s9l5$jBZxl-I7Y)kg!;*bJX2N^G+Nbjq)PCJ6 z8%K!k8z5&!x$OJ5N-5CPXOv?N@y_b~Y@lN(A@^HU=9p2PSb`hWT&jx)u@D>ky`mgAJGwL-M zhqs?QD8%tMK;8ykqZThFisPS*dRmXl#Jf+4<45_}1zy2|k{06lc~Ead`xC-S^%34D zDOcp>_E8)+aZE@Oa)+JUF-axiT9ATufcd4 zfxoEuw5XU*T^I)|@DYC{j8Y2nwEv-ewRFu#kJx`_Q2)*hyjo1`zZxeqjkhT{-~$phbzazy)@4m?wA#r zZ%VFjep$>nssh|T$~Sciba^7?8y#>u{eUs{(P0WzS8|tPRI>QyRkGhiI}_;`$x|;PW!jb zX=zFpt}4jwr+jRi)$N81xY$1(c+|h9e}DQn1Uzb0O!g;+Uw{_#V8A-vAW7u7}F2{|{)>MLtK2ovNrWdiko@7nfIl=nhTrQ&{Qk~?4D za6w*;_#t~1KDXT$$JYos8sFDL+s>fzW&PIyx1xMyycnkt^xIKS@!NWXcU^>l(|Sqc zceU-O8{+u6Ay4D?L~E)^40d67#1QIK@|wTz$KU z`BObRFh5F4t~w{?M_mzaFXhK3Z|@co^P>?s<;Mk4{hEvU(E+?MW#veG@H)BJ;iZuTI{BWMfmm9nSwHE(Hd4}O$)a%nYui}Z4*W?a90;2y_MY)~L zq882<^M?-g+6!Dhsm+xOlplQK9hQjp>Haw*_|J}R%S-nSiQ}yU-wNJ8EeE`(`-jAM zv!dV0;9a@;zI|jOY2u~GSAp*Wzu@kLS~?F+QaQz^7yRv);tkOzV)Byt$BFpS6yyG> zf9zFiZtxgx#k?>AUvqp%?>qvo0&WF<;>K2KUIDkGp5pUf^Usy&yff2p$G*i0p0?f$ zw|Kr;gX1MPaASDcEp)z_jSrpQcH%sj7rd1n+I&|qp4&-({r1rLu;Sd_o~LVCRp2q) zfO?9@dE3U^q4T~Br}Nu%{;=Hi*PUg8ye&w+=AO1=LIgY+IGqnn)9hRrD&Q{Qa2`^JQUm_sU9H;WbpH;$C)L@V z9~TSq!T|RkVpJ*MhyD+ z+6j}CpFNZsnY3SC zZbknokKJw1y^~b$hnar4vNX3}i_(;|ZnsR3k4Jq*0{8E(D}U|?5pWA|8vpdtH#>z2 zcoJ~RWAY{?`p5-bf$J41;8h=~oD~M#=g-XdoKQTZfp?(%bWON{+d+RBKR6yT!0&SA zW@&|vn7m~C;CN7%;r=jxk{*lD1dbQu8-wB@9{dWcXSpI(+4;fokVyPo(kf9w@xby( zTF`Txtf%aK1Zf!O6v&6blyrO-=#LgW?dIG~!}P4T+;3^X zS+DqOQ{=7e+uL&KQ+2su&zM0O~F6%#3x)o#lv@nEQ@8_Jm2{E_L-0;|Ckqj94Ol7+>ZF$&C6zr zl*S<@u7JrK5SQe?d`Sy-$%Ob|M9(mOm0vPy2z=uUe=|-IwGILo?D;mE zeiQiRZf!ON(f#im3eLBz11t~6BM&7(J{2Xy*>Qqf_|Eu_puDX)$nQ(w`h53)#`1h% z$9jBmapYDh1AQMBC!ThJ_wy`05wcOLW+=yLT{TqU{_56gRGtvEANI?eQEzU~_3U4^ zNFFNSv~JtL8~QN)N4bD&I&e8{Jiks`J9hspT9;YgiNDPABJEdP&=Y%T$#c@fd&B#i z4BUhAMzu>5!_c08TwyQyLsgaA74u6!-^mSX5f8wvsPCNxGzhy zn){LRUx7m%Y6RrJYTOT$|L%`;8N~b*51jIA&DK-yi}}w2oaTG0kt-fieq;Sh0#5nF zJFIQA2@ zXn(=!clV0+d)@}(MN8K2CF1egK>zG(+F^j`A1!bT%3d9YRucWAM12yBj=YCpy*?LPM_&)>VVgYaU%Q8hGfU|i_&!N$MkxAe+sl8ZB>jEE5|NbHKJy-PJ zt`zX+?Yj3kN=r;$GX3-%8od`Q9sJ9tD{rFJ+4=Mwn&&0AM_GgWWyhxF?igiue(-r9 zJ@^;qO0TeM=HmQhc{w#GFI&K8npwQld$DM~4s3j7wm4p?;8VQE^>M_|c(6Pc?9X)Y zleeCc(>hI7Fh1oe@~0$@+xwwF8+}A}e})D7Qw#ovdQ;LP)ufr1On>|g(2cPivFP%@mYmx`L)PU5FyT=$5Y}EE^h_@@V^5-u=5Dw zhw9rh&B>h3BapqKKiPVtgPa#7ok!5r z;{Fo(Y`xK=p7n?MA?0VjuP~42{VDqIn*JdeXNJ={;l}T<{I;jWLMh_RXGgfQ7Vp0U zdNmfVCqC{*D_Qn<%)GBR5&Tq?QSI+V(td+{#q^V3X`Rmif99Hh$I7$EV>tQMiFH?9 zoBN^H-m?S46oK)`;!e_)_m|=*9(?kTX{nP!ykLPx7t=L=apB{3w zUSI8bGg|DQ8n_AN{a3FDP{-G;{30sgtc9aktc#N;K@ zA3VNk;P+W(*c0(T<_(RnM92LyvuOTuk&3|aW%-82SDXiI-Xy}WTFBG9G2y$&XYwkFnxejodsxG(N|3inq${WXH7i=5x@&m(}Uv`^iL^nxWiY`)Dq211}=sL{;(l!JCiAA<3WW)_581>zTij zA?HH*+#9PE_VbzNC7iI^1K!3J6)Ohs=UH9|KAuq2i2PtuB5%kzA}H>AoqXuXEONCT-+}urG-j_LO1J=cP+1XgSUQj z!K!i*N4=*A=Pmzqyla?%n}Mt9bGzS`P3s<+iTmCYiM&Q*tpkrySo?H;Kl!87mbUc- zf5@%ilm6Q~lm5!m@4G*y6_0=NM|jP>?WrxM-wAn&hxtvHJ{IChmhlg_i{?j#q@j*B ztE!bi|D;~X)BN}l{r=LD@l%fyuKI%8P4lD0UM@~0Q{N4Y!4%6=h zKAQ>nJ|F5=nV0go_3!L|<{!GwMtRv?tW-mBUGNm)$N%KNVsA#A7Uz?;6km5K|5SZ? zub6lo;BL*wN7sP+>E)4s`iRF-M%2@BqNUWg&&1;x(ogGJ%N~OsiN`5c$lFo6zgaq! z_O<@;M?Lkw!G?3K#N!OgH)`C6SgdpCL79npCotc5p{L>s$JP)NLpe_QhU8xzI&xQT z^26M}4Y}Pql!bmaM}z@q`Gf8+a6`Wly#2+#_?nJ)xHf(qLwptZR`BDu4c!*0Cnhgh zzHnpwy(p8x-yQMlW)8&?hgoL!RbG(xU65kCn{7 zi}irvPHKNBUpMl_e?0cI)^Fbfm$`w@VHLj5t$wq|eLv(zL-s%GUka{IQvYk{msb+= zrxn+s3Ey76=6>2gGWpE-*K_||*c-oHoIgg?ll_Sg`YxgMh{=>E{$5&tM%lc!n3fCt1s^c%rD@}YbC2=tTpmdC$x0MAFXK3l=h+vR?~ zNbGwAepvAOoDBY@J+8}9L`2E#RiPhl@V@=`b^~_&$UY3Gd`RORQE*m%VZF?ZCx3wX zWOhGqm$L5I%ljlx@t|qK{nF{IVOPLY5Q*`^C)t7s;ExTzFrU*VFsAoAUl2xLaa1+0XKg0eU^u zPw?hgRGo7g9~w^$_y+KQ?NjzdPUE8h&kA0PVgq`_Fz5O{%>HE5Q#>{-G`U|cAs$`8 z$-h6gY#S9T;2z*K-|`Hpx19aXJo_;FyvP@ne-+KRAKX38=yR+6w9G%OKUT_5;GJK) z{%RiZ7;Z$p3wG`LeV-(+fG6SiVswbhf|L45#Qb50JlS(()7PZ~@&|Ay%A<>_^vnnS z%pUST%_lc_#Xc4d%dgBd#s3fE2hS%j_~UR?9KeRus5UK4(@y6us&`bMMcfE@0fceyn??0U2bmuN66+hf5m+y#{V? z!+UKl|LZ&){oc76{F`w%TK=!|aLHeA{qf*ycfMVb(|I_uSIP{;hn-JIg&m2I4*`~f z?;@X_PjI20(U>3T_%yvQzmB#oQmQ2#3|F+`b~{$_d383Wba`=oa2U9p2E4x%H)FEq zlkYynpyNRUc+`Gs>p=P0eWks#8H@m1@9^OwMBUr>1MyjkKtH61w3|ML2m zztKLG>6f(S{ik(y$N0es;n)}Wa4Fr7s=;x_ACkm6^Ix`Gjs8jXkatUX{EVH`rNpYx z79$8Z0awd7KEL_ikCR)sF9KYa2>in0+7+1Z<`3Kbra?mS%<~iu;B*{xy|Cw1sqgLe zNPjADI!}@N_UzB!X>%_m{prB-vI^g4RAQ%PCtmmXnf=e!eMviRKlzvZ(7fBjAIZ;* z%RbCsYUoo#?!<{rnZHZJ^aaOXJb1EgvG;P=_h-95(gMDv-^tc&U&(wzAErMzULD{+ zaGaL2^-tupc^4diOc#sGM8riJphcQl29j=GS0UHsYLmKqaI2^5={xa0SwDWk+!1XBYUY%XQzYNn5lb6ho!Pgt~;GaHz_E4;OF`H zjaA{>aEkt7ekcEk^~~=nu){(9LmO%MF7lb*J*a0i=673AeADxs9B229@bx?0!Pigw zU<(VAom!>24mjR{G#^czG@4@{_L_KdeM3NlTFKg$vB1{W!J4{2c5LhWYo0u)_g)ns;gV9_(ii z>X|&t>#EBb-$%S`eDCvTasQ<0#O=0%=WhNsQP@ApQ{M6Gg9h++Rj&U%#Rt=GM!mto z=iMb~@?_c{F`V|NHt<$HHlOx|zyHH<(ogLx7fpFZHZt55q`yzQin+!9(R&R%;61B1 zqPy6?WYjA#+NOq{pNjNUlzwN zeGJb#$>44Ls$pKS|F$6g&cdA-_-Ig1??YPA zeE0+LcwFNSv@c?0<$j`lX2?_gX3Ts2m1v(0IQjpJea+j7{WnniD5L+>O%{*$$^Q!A zN1hu~ME`qGpEim6vF48I>7sp#ZrpCNZ^*{aA4L1;{j}uAaf?F_ivBY|J_Y*U)H@w5 zwr>Vb{=am4;U=+t8*qAG)Zuey@{8@$`)QLgPNkM_+$8$P71aNqEKe$n{qq2)IBNR! z*R{p|DQ*OgUu3UlWySGR7`cBmD7#N8x>M|bGV~jOS908cBaV+PNPpf%UknuWn;~aI z>D>OzB%ZI)kbS`SEgaXK)(3z7L%lMQkMF)07gmesYg`zA4|v0$Osp8o)2ly!87Tg{ zb35~0FF2T%E2iIr{G$Qhw%g6txj|s-p6e~ok1p^G;4O5Wxsityp*_Z@=izBTYX*N? zwO>lou?pz^{@I|{4xXx=@-zJ)9qS*hD`~rVKh7Fs`-=06@+0As_cl2wMZcIlFV5i_<>1FWAZz`a;6#?2fxOa=nO(}2@)MqIC`a>8|`%ePRE-~s#Y}RnVcLCTow=f3ajva zwpN<+LzSZ+X0rc%`ZKSKQ~NXayxr4qU+ewArAa~UZ!K!sd}dI$7KEn+wLc{K)BJuN zh72M7X~3_s3g73>%NqYhFFjS3{qJi()Dq<1f}!R6F^qkf|CGJB{p8=sn(qdS{?!7f zv6&G-M>&QF+2(Kv`(C;`FnqgIfkbI zr}6Fg>C3rtwZHrR{!<*&{oA!4^nEQ}cc<%A8PGF!&)SaR{?UW|y}A8#-9DuAq9Fe&CChsmh))ao5&VQLx##BeJcAc#ou79R}o*KP^@ zJBI81F!PVxihAl__YvDhDFmGI4C(hYy4EN}z*Tg-it}N=emC#2h`XVm@<>>*>VrcC zc_(l$%E!;$3b}yWsegUB{RzD)?xgbxQr|p~OZbOM%F*Tl3H<>vJ2TgNBlK904k|tF z$Fda1p^2!c^WX1B-t}Wl2lJByIITyMVs6Z(Imhr+;N+(Q+o$~``XL=S`Qg&6KF>uz z=zvT5aXW9HdDt{k&n;m3?Z~&8`TkPXfifW<>mf(^c+z|A3voT5d~57w>Q98617)p(=YN!=eKB9Ffv2KeRVlAM3U+X7xIeA!`2IK@yv?_d|3i72 z*-O8RNBP#=HGLZ8I{$d!ckyUEru>tyj5r?J{@jo8C>zf^agbtz$y-oQ`PY4@w}WDc z;Yq+LEA2;T`4)L7BLP zIm7TI$Wh*3vFQ6R!*3){Wf~Zs0-W-GmADe0e}1}w?rWB%0jIp{aqft)C-nYE@)^J> z?{;W)=;588F3u%f`8BtX^8WtF-{MEjuMh@YrUm{dtMGlswE1Y>aOVDF_P?)xG9CQ& z7pw4nmR;W2>D2b$>$CqE9*_0>4y*8emT#^+xk>&X3$y=yxZH_xq4C}RXjHf`Uu90{ zzsCf8pOfvc&RXAfY#jTa$$Np*e7_tewda)AGhoN!T4Pt_l-KFL$CT$c&xe_qcCMfD zx^^J<)A_%)9}GA7VSoGasHgc{sGGEeLcl4nlm55$V=jdVxSR4Wo*&yd4dtRWZ#G8&m;R5uJtkq$PzgRhKW64_rJ36~(A9o$;-ImW7{!N& z>QGO4TcPdqg&;3C0;fE2w1y%<%oA4N7>Yr{9_Y39yv=;Aw z2@!D0`$q6)HmKbpRKO|klm6CoC5J@)R>;{==21OS${{c2eHCyg%E4Wu&qcuw-di5G zl=t1>b^iC&;Ap|#B;-MgtLTuje~NimGnm^;^Rncphp)xFs{n35Ic1*aXbkkTJer32 zri9dmYXHC3q>EqDeR3ql z`logy zcg^8W&JnNJSEgSQiSz4tFUre`8ykwx=~3SI;QZT);V*WCK^K!Z4C8*IeC7P%pD)Gv zLHa3QEjt$Vn|M58hP(}>Y2dS#;_*N->S_GtVRl1=o_E0K@66+H7kG(Ie*UWD^F7UJ zKa1{4M7|TxF?b+Xpk?koQNH;ie%N>_fNM~yhI4yerH>SgR*P)^d4Vtw#*xl%8o(bt z>e}+)=Z2a8T;N;5`?p!E-MNJEPewi6@3*O~rx(3n!Y>b;;=Agz8wZqG@|pXF=jiI3 zuO|MMPj%}I`^x0KxGqQW<;s`WcU72w#PKEnZ@M$>i8#LuBe*|O^!$Ay^6hy}i}TA2 zJhc;_NAo@`SQMe=`o;0Efk)$~ZyWo2BzT-1n9q~JZyq;jQxtftziw);1CQ&1F?D{X zaq^ERa1BZ?%4W+i9L#BaJn*l|!tGpkxPB6y|MvR_^>jaFX!}3n>AW|?DL>Kt={)yz zeR2NSAW!4>&@jB0czw@IILb~nCcVpx@zqH}6^^|;-bsHl;>iX6yN!J-74q?e*8zI& zgszKvz_0(q`*!|KDLLI&GCN$D|LT$44_3<`zZL<9U7rrVPRby5e}Mt#@8cn7LCJ7- zzl}}!&iLk_>#Y*pKgjjT@va)h?XyGw{mCXxBv6YvMBFctv9zO0%-8h% z=JMP9+cL355#8iRjXh7X|9$4K@4s!3#lIIg-KU_$`%bd+YWm9=Mv9JS}}$o2jH!xBSI?b(6bNUo?PT#?nDToKRZoxo3Y zPwgs>j{)^=luMoRR$_cuVZRsnsN`Ht#Q4wwSB>HJ4rp}#oZlEezg#T( z#{s<*pGz)yri$_DhP)T$f+7P~i~Xbay=ec7K1T!Qhi)wQiw^D2v$QtSII{7k>w9!x zix=~(q3T5v@!$@>Kb-~neLYs_onLXNO^7dfGU_Fm_nX`Nd0xz)F5o8I-~0LCUu{Hx z7=e3GjvAS=j_l2;zY5s>;%tE_|Es^6aoi7Q_NIO-_ScAd^8bl9Nk57G^&oBt-*@?s z9%BA+<>%|99eV0E-(H{k!QzkJGe+_&{!ViU`9UWEassHO7JDt0WA_E%wg{IV;NH?KZy>&B^+gAK z?dE1%Vu7=DFx&d&!`Qm!gq#s_R+LPXt%FIzcQ(#R_#HdiM;6I_XSO(xQ^8Mr%J09r zn$YuS(a-7B&SRcOG&LHw7UO{Ki;_&>b}ri=?G1=C$f<$9U!MP-7$?eSyj?x;JO@;b zvf>~_;tE>FP2e$mnSI*lf$|kE=>Eu(_pS5zostaLr&~5HQS5&z^rfL6M{e#sEyPi% zyEfk!kuWFbx|#!eTO3{auT9;p57}dZ zADp;8vUlIPfcx<1ccL;N|I@XV%LISPC3vp{$?Ikh>`VRikJm)*C&Cwwo?KOwR|1bm zx&DPiMmGH~d;5(TK5$fvvHxFtlc2BB@Eyh8_x#oldqY!EpVXG;OYOu~X7ZVTe1SVI z@Nu#%(mtp8!ScQV_7YC_y-qm2<2CU_eUeGsel^N1Z=P)x<1rrfG!C<#x1TP~Ckt>b z`n7z@olT=QH3+g}lvv%oS)5s3dpY%R6 z3);(Hc5-Xc9tY|v-bTkA`A>{TdY>7|?=F3)y(pgw`E-;!H!Jm`zvEFanau5#H1Clv z+DrGPs)3iRb2yIXsyH4LKQ(U;EiAU5)}6nvko*x>_em1@fypOAFXiv~j|Ns3b{=hI;kc5r*Qi}*Q%aZTqo72r{mI_ zhGmWDK4zvr3Gt){Z|%M@P3ZWU;U?76_$7t!*%okK;~Af~l#kk%ifJN_j|1|QPc9Yf z(@h+o)S&)tdGTPb_}sHSFV|1wGycfTYNCIAFX|~eIbI^6{tb%CI48zeI`pf-`)^Z1 z_sATMyXn3~J$U4=xb6d%u=kqLn6ubt$LndxzZT?yM6_dqd{n3MA?*B)D97>@9j{BU z-q^waYW>^4(Jh)@5`TQ5oiy;Sx408V&yM-y1Gr==_k-!1vtQ(a2DXn0UcVW{_A!aH zE<#R^lHqJ0V-&tKz6bjN^A~(P%zJqL;QC~tskk4`i0gynr`Ga{@2yXUKDu5~;=A6b zq{#GQ9;e@rR{qZQ*9e>ZPG(}QWPO<3F6i^1JYG1@<`C#(xM~{r2c6GcH1pp#p;@@h zHJm?ZFdAxaAKkB=@UG(&_SGjZOCG`TvA`>b-OamatKC0!8E)v!=j&f8d79M6vAtV8 z+TFPQ50IDI(LNpj?_AO&*W?My9E3Z8)A4`7&E-B;=}>{*FC%jUAI}7QpNyw{OW*qY z^9%MrYu{$!{hPole4m0LV+Z6lKi$p#XZ}=8=k}}cdkM}b{5UmX#OxySB*x16FuoV< zCH=(rTROA-h^H*j+`|45PUH6Cv6(dd>U|gC3t{Uzva0kpC9=glpF;uKZvW{U=|krT_X4Nu=p##yIlrpzH~oOiR5Q7K z6ra_;Ua+ytv-GAUuLDl;S!Q>OJBOQ=_7ZLcPVuQtztH*lz+C>+&ircy?w>F|q0SXn zEqYU8^Cl+G{A&kpe8&Anzwde7(DxUaiLtUi%wJB}Y(r7;3hTS|b zc)L4u*LYSgU3R{E z81GN|dmcAt@U3fiPL9=N=hJgyUdY+O?|roQHKi&$Klph*7x)j_^q!Ji5xB0fJWu&q zDyU-571@v)Ua_e4&Z*F^|0uz&vT?$s2EPiBZ-h}J#&07 znSeV`Z!XF6WxE!YABF<=jZ?S>`gQ$zJE`Em-J+XE$6;g=TZa_gxxcC3=|TO~&*t-r z`ctrB{Z7;$78k+oX>HsOk8NEt&yP`i{`28M?Qy^Oo+pJ|Jjz6r3}@@7UHH!Wol!cl z-_FzgIt$~o-}!NYugx9EBRgqN#rX8`wG-wEXeaBu60LjRJZPOyrsooDytH$;y>uOD z_L@eD5CQitL_B}Vm;~deEBWyYoyS#v z&;3)QX6Ypny6k*<{+0CWiND~Vk&(W<7OX$p^N-+5+DyM0rOM6^{(T$=_)B7xsqBFx zQ9qkE8qB}U=ZQ(b&psB4if|A+NI9rElG&dO^d}y?(XU^O z3CFnm`Wq?<`n|H!w`La?^R)wV6rZ0qO(`rD?2*78>Tj`&yXuJXn+|!h_n$}Z@?!i- zk^=30HhG0!w3qT3*{cSBPn(k8p;CXiQ zTApw2|JU^&X)1Rr8{d?m{&o*-F+?WdhB;g=4ZKmswJk#gJOlM6JTKpObj*ox;B5W{ zzXweD1NYC2ADu-MDZC%_m-WXwgy&CM?>3}K=ZEMygXv35=lwB3Puf79=l&_GoE@4@ znzH!ue+BXrA!oG4ER&}N@>%=zUOZZl-)h5miTe$Ti*)GezqLjialav1$nDd-;qz+W z+23E#euL$g%-e5(ewm%vXiAI_pNWWX zE$~(?d;gtFz~fO*>w$G?>)&DpT(XRhFU_ZvVvQ<`>tzz;X?{!|xbU&KUZw=;zgZ)t zNoXRsgY`cRIF0+4FB;F63%CV%2Fjk^xyP00pMSiupGraAQZD9xIRATxzjGt+@YeWo zBIQF#UcOJ#f}i?Fw#H-^kiC?Mb&z{x+qCn~!X1TNZ7`%mQ(ZhzhZZ=@Kz%RALoLEeiogcjaR4?WJNl5K>sJJ4K&yN3S|0xw*!H%mXSij>TPsi1X_%8C< zakU-wOpPy2WF8qm9`?U*+E?eea_36ytvgkKXTDEEyPh8>&d?rT9f~UtEY4^jV}hPh z#w8=A0nkK_8u3pADqxDL2w9iPv}n)g412)GeA{XTvB`;~Ty?Mv`pW-EAk zI<-9`hrDmxGvC*)f5qFUa>@YXT&Y9!4xcwe4T$92ka{K30$#IcyhpN$t?2d8;|>g>l+k9EMg3OPyQlHSFI+MMg4Bb(LSh6xozn= z>Gy)ys>$F~(x21(b57!Rr2Wx!EZON#zR156kGfUdA4w%&-4**|Mm?=7tA5#1QS6Tm zIPL2`KAm2X`oqRU1w0w$n7EB6#PN2*4j1q_y*_LZ$6E#516(`zO=N^H-a5pAVm0r7 zM!DVINCCGa4mH3}T^oBfO2EyS2L|9Xo_-FG7H~WAuNio$Ye$k}L>%jr4fq!8FMs3` zajf6Tz?V;`nkQDkjYIhU+XZ~|{iyj$0rz76;16M(h!omHpps@C7 z9_&kKycyq)crXv-?P|bRtu6d6Z=zHpu276`1z(N*mJ$40UDr$VS+etu;2WUd27ctF zFP`Q%W#>C5^7zz%?*#vGr+q~W#AoMQ!FPYn`|kn2#Lb$?1@+na-fy`6WbjpMxPMyR zUv@&J&CX8---Xfu{+NE>-72Kc&ewovg?=me{l>|z7FK5GD@O7BWB@-I{B8?#*^2nQ zAMAhk1m1s|UvBU}S`9OcW=OK}o!~3*{!GPMZtuL`@BCFPJv-kX#MglzGO@k2xbHkc zaDOO%lzVvoH-rD*iXFR4q-N(+{FuA&^AvXQN3R@jR{PEq1nZ~x(SFVCc7Y%FI=X5} zM|M8NPsVQEA20YdGH&lI2mr(1Md_K|h%!AMG+{7^UVe5}(1Gksfr<+U<#F(+ zVe)3+bi6rfQmLtV1>6Rl_WSK~DLdv9@MPe0JQ}|B!R!12?gCE7cW26P{!~D~J;3Ss zXGWDh%7Ox}*vRdp>cToU_!ePIDN1E>97rIkB$ zMFiXioc2p`wN|b#D&Wb$X}{CubkXo)0`3A%`-|0{Ijf5cxCb~LuXk=!uYCytS8U?; z(|PC7%AM=g0%9`$6Iti&v{4E_4uM=R$~51 zlOa#{^SrvdXyBlj|E3b|0#5hyBz<>f)rjNo{P(*1=AX<1{NwG8kJzl-e&TiI*}ckm zNM5m-+fVoNoV(FxZ1vdM{zsL4@=^_Ox}Rt5H;H*_&Pn+R@-hSPuULieGw=T6v(Jh> z_{9Ea@{S<;%BCr|H@i@mo zT)@e`YP%kuxZY~VbZXxNoa`%e<(HGnks-emuGqruC;PPdd)+>Hpn?DN8q==Zl4)bZ`fG=ixaGU7jUxgkCBDS6g;z!o(qtAfRlX*8RwmsuMe3@`W0Kb z{ry;l?=x&gi(HehbA>0L=>>GD%?52$sts6QhOY~>rJMPbv z4g5T|Zdu1=vUEN!TrzO{oY4Ek_e#wW@YwizP*3BxW7M1ep}=!$FMcC$ub8z|$DGArz7dVYy^S6(RR$0OyM`G=( zc5?e@{Qf>(srVqn_!i9PK3t{)J_v)LESoa2SmitZSF$pBHO?DRe3of)FZZ;YqiMa6 zS|LyNP1<=-^Io^O4D?Iwz{$STy`%c=E4DNhxXcNh?E9|Ih;0pXCl@7oH*m6V<_2AQ zxq)d6X8o6Xfs=h3Ha7nv_lRqkfXh@V-2Nec35g`%!T2W2?H^LvS212($QPzfJYKHs ze6w68kwJfg2))(s7i}O1kKs1dQ@p%99O8RFIoHGbYknOVFUkUQV-*S2 z#;_I`?t(n|Q*~hQS3k{f`hjo{aPsH1-Cbj%`%a_%g-o$4aK2yNv;C(#?FybGc@1## z=g9mw=Tu6~0gBy1DNDezRLO_CK?q&R^>l zJpVq?+Q-V2nfA+*A)h&a>ukOpBH%9IB!6n4t9qz_dw`RF%dR?hRi1^*ENywa6i>wu zyVHNEU`<8;q?+BB?|5HiM6dj(E+xI#LAU`p*GIjQNqVvzm(EHb}dv`;?WBzpS;PK`LzO`MIw_yVA zMLqc=qr*R)!?SQ%M!P_NY+6*g!lcp}de(O~-nu=3{%Cu4-c-{TQp2)OW@!*6!#lx_Z>wAX?xEnah z=TXScgbKJ9IN5)AW{v;kS-8}Mb%*ko<=oa^X2{x>M*pO`pSk@s-<)xA4ZoGnXiB&d zIL){Hdup{Va_8|w;4&+4inq5ZiT%4g-#wV*?Z9ciT^K)qdc6nx^@KZtlYa-!x) zZoeM#6^$dLask%?r}&Y-X>1P@a0~7uQ6PSI4SSp+6L2f!sr~S@F~`OJ#p8ZcJ9sHC z=gt%RNBSMemuDwQddc)z_PHTP=Tr8aXgn=M!0Gym7rb@98cv4_IOSvN{}+S4IVu(U zuiMZ4;|k~gUDe@zH_<*LaI&v+=*F)_`>ep}e9p|ZyGo1pQUC1V^%>jw2>D;km+9~? zm5*zmh>)7NA6P7~kC;!~&=hNU7_M+~dno^w8G5Tx2=JWRqw`?>tK?3}sXYz! z8BkVio)8l%v}Z*gjyksnkLT$v)Pf zO#8v>Uh-43@Eq)?_^0dXrYAohlIs7*_(NZEpF6+E!1LRG5b=!t+;?#w7K`&m1Khcs z^W^VSHi`4a0G!SrR*>!6Di`#VJ!bIUTsbi`40uldC3_l99MUy7zH;IxLvMP2>$;rA zgXXgvyq9wgVIiihe4#kR?XqEAFi70(|JV4_{RoBj&)%C;dm897pj-y`*{}ili^;})A41|@B3~S z{h|7W`-9HsKIs2YN&aB+G@d%}T5Q|VQnZiuXXNj-aS5eG{WKm{$Y7XGRl9VB5HI9k zFY<2*-QvEYe~pmS<9?%|$BwiU`)37C=eteMD|{!~PyV%o7tuxXjc7mVx8bz{%8SrB9H2T-|Sye7bD_WXNwgNBF zcvNVtfUAJpfgj4{R4WDCiG7O`xb{IWvcihkA!IcE~>w*#l^ zDVC$-nu+aa>W81N3~p9Kj2}1TjnKa^yv1$N|6bs9J*M-}3QffJGxcMf*GxFLE+GDn za{uU{f8Cv!G2-|efm^VT{kCf7-^KPxKdpy{|NLS%t%uA%cF3!sU(r$BF(Cec)AgXG zw+mMg+b8{Y#QCtO&Hcsxdm&HpfBNRD@5T66{f4;5{b6nPr_K@EC;d9ivxW=0-52M# z5%O-#udU?^_7~?L-3L$WQ^9L@cZvDa4tZLieqC)#6!VW0IIT}3|EYIK%s+16biJ#5 zopKVfe^%gLls&tgj~DGH`&7s?`KHDHD&~LP@7zC>fA)3zsYXEl0Z!M`LO))}E!t1| z?a<$GYm;VT|Ll;r!+$^b8sZhlkNijLPpahcYSDjg$kY0>`r7NfqW`?WY5j@SI8sFa zsg7~`=z3rMdz%8*Unk^s;8my*{y_8(+2@6QKdS1+iS}6`XN7(H_WYd?Fn_6kSl_B` ztP-$acS4@lw>1l2EED_h22R%_wVr)D#P;pLy(r&pNIRU9e`)<|u>ABe(SN$*+&^?2 z^n<2f6R~|Ga9aQ37Cnp>+qVLz>!Fc{Eu%&IRlw~iS3RzLN%XG~{dNMsWPVy&j6W;< z=LWt&@hVA-ZxwJa@DXjiN5%QA!@N+P;CA*swbCQz7dP^U4){7r!Tw@?vjR5)-`#0n zXEDF3fLno|k1{P3^ScxI*$zBIRd}qpz8HZ!ftNTGnMYjTyvUnw;BQC$(JwF7Ki}~~ zm>cImjC7s=ypW-5z4>sQPsfjp@5T8fE%rmIliV+tt8Du#Kh{l=Z^!vH732)yuUzx@ z#RA&E<1?n;hVzjs$XUVf^C4<-L3Iv%oX=H2E*bnaZ*K2bDYNr+IRBkY=gGmpQ@KZt zLXzx!Bd!m)7V-0_3KzHcyZ%G&70!^7ss57n-;V1`R$N!nfj_s@oP9;ov-1_W{^mq! z20uxE3e2G=iB@H~ed{C>aB9#JecyM6<%_tNtpF7WqMZ#%PiN_M^(*T;$P z1;6B(^Ln~Zgp6kEvn`qXL-PkO?@y{fzOsYsW&I7lpVA1Ptl`(*DoNSfr~BdPeo8C& z3Ffmit0rcn^Hrcolp0}(fyQW@PD}wHY`q?ogaKZoE`j2p3wtq zs^z8}s8{-S0*tJn2i#uFpRKmTyQEZtA(1b;%6SNrRwX6IA< z(EXGi@N2K$zqfu$c0R=q-A}1H!|h!&W5uU09NGC4KXgB(0sLy8Hmqrol$}rUL-$i! z!FTU!QnO)Vc0R=q-A|be{@XWo4mGl5=Lg4+8~g&_3@N2IW#?1;(EXH(v)taLTdU`8 z9G{&}@k94h>cF>acMNT!&(05yA2ay7&hE-+s?E+1jvqVt`;yAMZKlr74~`!f_*FJt zY1v$vogaKZr5F6W-+9`wi{4_qvFG}N@2B)pB>wlyY~X&q&2yO~l!gz0xL;P-bc z5D)3#Pgr_c6Q$42xBrOy>`^K&a6hSjJJ~Zj`#cTT;QgiX_4suJJ@`B4%wHFy&aOZB zd0GqjZSIxcn=AYCx8cF_)B%3654|+8LC@c^`DhM){|orcEo^?dlev8~E;7U53gY{K z)E5KeLNWGCocO+tjDcL9;%42MS&OBKOgrW$G@5J~{1Wxm7`{Hef#Q4?& zcc5%{5%Of;^%+;nh9)v;F7E(N z?OQuvtV#2i=}!et$GN>PPYtJe%WxC$bd<{;mw%-Y`X{-}?Wg0=hSQ%FiV$$yE51!xg z;KwYedOvse`5hKKzZ1b<_-mcgc@%;A**Z+~J221rZVN`-ra(Rfu1&{xkpk4*`}zC+@_ZVQcH{7>G~n{YVf;BAimO^z)5c4c4CQgH@5A4l zV!g`!r)juWMens^acf7teKglo*Y&WGT$Jz4<(=To%=O!mFab{+5!n7$?Z*bRFWH3W zd?5dC#|trH`>JcaU#a8y{C$(8SuD2ihMW$(N7rAN!iDzr=${dIzL<5p6$0+C1om(J z>v2;=|4{$zkZ%^(`?J_TC+eNK`276&Kpm&pKPzxI%HfK?X3%?q+52~m=)VTzmsEt0 zqZj<&D!B5p_xy@+!scV}`~OsK?x(xuiXEc&Ci79|(L|ms`z-gUL-8CRgd~crzIIXj?gy#dr_x34n1lp%x zzxb2*-aZX*+Q+62-F_#h_x9P)jsg6H#mz_mulM$);65QU_#K*P-~F%m_PJhiKiR>* zaG-6UoZj1)VdCRJ&o8>b?~!()^8b2oAL;jkzkTWkSx)cm3(nJ;o7{gVy4QUEe|c}8 z5&W`qRUdMCZ(n-QzRdsWg?7d~;$CuYK-wT;J z{@@p_@pY4&-n$nZUz$I;zxr0*+CQiF?x`m7^~MO^wTR_kitpW{@yr;&<96fS!oSEY zg1;e0^Skhn#v{bzP#18Le?9KVCGj}a1DwV)Li1yccpOUa)uVX&$-2ZO?(;RbxqTE* z;Zegv#rNvbc+q%2pR@gwI9_JRQ~OIRx9|$%mHA#IYTpL_FR@+vA_VtnfU;{G6eYd#-vMzq%m zoaF!L@}{6@FTJOU?6rdb!>zK0oa|Krx1-!vb!aoeUbzePG(M$Dz1~Of)noCk!0*J< ze5K!G*!6eK%Tk9p8v@ruMLM^0<@H%dWZ<#&Oow`!e-|#4`w$}FM&KlW;YZo1Pyx3F z$xFUz{zfj~7BAnAkpA%n6?a0^690$U<66YW*9kpzAL`*dvAaW4IgkD_e##G6H^6tJ ze1ETZL|6(jc`5pf?r$J}9q#w@MrjbA`9nE_&u`rw?yu+n#TS)<=U@L(Px8P6_ z0#0#a18>-aj|W2qTz{1JpZw9yc%+w1&HKyrCqvGKGCKVAemUfQ_GBKXDS&%Wp1s(< zXE=D|1;)4Fxqq@-ahKa=99iD2a1fK1jIRdYhVw@{@K0YmJU=2Skk9(-LA;v5%lmzU zWs%6s40mIG+JQg+?##F-0e7OF{86Cemb=jcPS?k2emyE!dV;t{*sL}>d-`P2kV~>IE|aOgL{^^KDwdb2wul(i}KNX1pVVd_eaA{D|iFXg%8eU zxKC&OvmxKRz^h+7ZnDzHV;_clQBV8XVW)pOnOneB z_XF)8`l{o3_C7z7*8!(^?iDp*srVj0BXIK14_z%2={Sd$ccTP z6Y_K(z=Q81pB)!T9&kID8Wtz?`)f208XuapPpW1p#~mtueVE4iNoxCl#k{14J`+mS z&EjUt<4k`d>Pi0FnI}$!s{QJH$929uAItYcN$+|7bAZ2D^Ku;>?{YRj9~|uGRPeuT z@Y{z_fz*B$C#t~+G{epfmj^5ow(VYa)WS|-iqX?!UUghdW+FV*{DzkcU* zejc0f8e_vQi@4sy?V~)fqGa?nnINwQZbJF)@mpnxfF}mYH~sS1$57yG{4;;=2RsML z#s97BB8MFkeAqlrg}wB<5~<+#9{!glOifH)GXLqp&j9b6ksE7;gU4|7LvA1WFZ|fm zctsX2Gvjw~X#A&@=(uLzHCu7k0vlfwAF?_C9;>v(NqdzVA!TXD)kseCSd6+lwFH@nQTM zcE0S&Beq-e62iyCq0jXHd5bBF4q0*MAq>wt@qhi{_onu~`&G7|u{nf$4jHBCf8OCs zK?b-}ig3pZsQO)0wnibmHIk=GV{ra>EhtFg)<8KmCus{Ptfi+w;nA z(0&Nv-iL1t^VKJBe7XLVr`~3G=>vcJpZ4G@&)$9S4ty`em^k#A{-u3aeEq{`Zuke| z&pPq%`_k04pC5NtKkerbK1&$pcV=q!VN1W+K>x<`{FD1Sd-e?UjEjq;S3cv5&@bMu z^XdM!^A4I2_kyMT#>e*1{v-aH_Jf=Lc*(Eqb!Tcw_bF*V^qarVw8Nu+(fniou+@{_ zs<79kafGvfSl)8sdV5`(ML7Gf!~gzpt-US{Av_0coLhVUg!G92?7z57V zgjao_{Wsh1%0m|Xa;z0zgx$bvnvP$7>pI`}2}0mgKk>v%^;7P`tX$p{~oo=s|3B^Uo}6j_}2MNTU!3bFuxBY{G^+IKDdbQ4p z|M^@+3E>adeD5mT{}Svne>WZf`dhaD;ooR`2*0lRvpTS2)b>9HKHI~yAO3SUJN_WT z)48(F)V}b#pb+3j%vdMy7pe)CR+?Oz_@C1CFH zi7#$z*=PAOe=d$yy=do8xTNV$L;sJj@7rVhPyb3yI&XNm>gcc7<(H;D(s|PEr%ko} ziy^!l*mUoo+CDD*{O;Icle4e+(ht2b{0r~=^3%5cJi<%B)sHOrgPr~$_`x?cozs5& z*~7N8@~0c^BaHB67rouTy%in{$T*&?5|Sm=bmHN-!#HYz(?NSc=QhN&znDCya=G53jR&=;g;aO z%{#`~lPQXP6!N@(5r%x{ErXba?;MxkIF|OUjzAW$e(uQ zL6=Mle^kDJ`A!l0+6Bn(zWnjsb_x0Ar9X^9z681AJCi5v3OSkI44t9%nDdL%9$$FL zA^oKr#F7ag6Ma+jhvWNAe>`c)qJb|Q#_%}8Ilo$b#_`ua^V|D>i14vlgwGL%`DJg| z^}gqp9JW^emiRgU@g7V!y!+>k%PzR&t>eq#$p87mFu&7V?h4&lw_mUPE$JJ^`ek@P z`}-xQytO~)*Akw7NymMT&zJsn)A3_bZW11POVh{k`3Lv>Y2r95ymm_sk3#OKpT6eu9;r+P~=d9EIGIZ`|TbZ~hb= z|6=R;fPYKQuCaf4e>e5FUO<^XKASCr`2KLk#>Zhu3)F2QLHkn+hRJov7r@1R}o8MmbsK7f1+BmD9`o;_9WnaNM|IsT-08RyK^a^Jf5hLEvQ%%{s#NpZ*1& z(s|64r=EL^U4Fq~O*iYu^c#PFr0rh`cEgZ+z5nLJJ}&(n50;-YX^JoX&|~?W_WmFK zVB3!&yc_uQqb|GEPJbTp=Mnys6NY}cjg>!PZssQTab_JcfLE{Db^kH=ZBZAzT*q{t)>bG-yvUu++7Es ze{?0}OnCV_s2u-p-sP}A?f(3xbz;eckBRR72ft{W$PfA1)fS+glcV>RO{K(gqoH^0b&%-|bd-0cFy42?% z!Uv##&K)oBclng`Iy$UkTw) zoH+A`TUy~9A9z3d7jLh>)s8>>PtBJw?5wYf{@wOJi0~NjJG1uw(pHvzmTwsGNA5nm z-_E~o=+XbX2Zpw@{ilBs+~a={!@UJUhc*^!KkMI)kya#W+_2bgd^-0I& zXCLoN|A(6XH2lB#igm}>_JatI0k^yD)($)UX~dgG_&$?6n&jTO{G|Pq&~CdCUOoMk z;5Jb&*bC2t&-vLmdZ+((TPwW0zC?eq+j}2AIo1jTp{Y+nV&-b(T zc~uE^!;pKa{Aa^&td>piF_wy)^SS3$ z5-jIfA)I66pg#bVaCz=#$f6}5IG$xz>VCvt+in~`AuiH-j>hM`IFG9wtNGIQi}9;C zUsh?A=ks1{ml4R{GWXeX`?ckHkGh2CB~p<8@VKqNu;oYV!NlSpun&Enj^jO$ul~+Y zmu?lJWkr*(6L~&cafQl9TXj4-_Ub#oGxlTbSDvon{jfU>eCWk{mu>wq_W3>XZunI- zPV?v6S7-Ox#+>fhTN6h@=~60oJ;b%ya^uk!SgE-aiO?f4O+wHk^M`L*!XL90w}4(DW_c>CjWyU)%C-`9vW9 z`{FB~ulQ(wPjK@)1^JgRDt_%_@_T}t-#w5|kNe6x$#457{=50z5BcN&aNoX?-}X=P zyJoWHaQs{J}BWKKm;aGutR;_g0KV6oZEQZbAEtmYZW7ZoGV0iRb4y`Wf$^TAk2>DaJh z*WVR;$KYNZ)@N0FD_z`AF+5cnlHgySC7@P$gpE>f(* z{4n!Pr8Czm4t!g&qE|6^yJA&dvFp2v0elyw=02t44=CmyR_uRNF){%93B~lE6>DBq z%nvJ8eFzNbesaZF#i7ZHv3)^LRUDY6m zqFA|)ViwpHQo1-rF>??Q>+$Ze()}|Pvk}FrLlnCXRV*B@*t<5bBNjeU7g%kt(DrPV~)l3C{j$$mL znEI?@wmSX6A z#r`omFV2otERIvG*+Mb4k7DJ4iUU=Oy$30V7AR&8Q|yl_Mi(m99;F!koMP%&#q@Cq zKLNNxvFaqnZahy_kx;q@-ye^6DxJzGrZ*^N&QvU3p;&X3V*Gl=!VQW8dBw{66m$10 zrhcMWcto-9mx|rLR;+wdu>_1frF8mvgue@V7&uY)H+qALL%S-bagVTaPo*mlRxD0c z?3tz*pP`tUsaP>vu{cMu@({)F0>#|ninUS2*h0mwMT!HTQw+p_%N1)*P%HrZ>Jgq) zjNrR#@joeD`;21jS>W@Ey)P){UQ`@R!m=_*xRjG@ioP6;P4enm#$HaT&vjs0OWoK{JCPyBZ|deDt0}l z7{L6r=LMznLyCj1C=P^l-y||wv1*E90XRHW>A(zx&sI#&QS6N<=8sk!u2C#}PBF4n zF}F;y@_5BOu<`_@d(QwrqnO#Kn7%-p<@5n6}x|>SoJ%_$|n`WxG!3P^oy?d!yh zgm=&OhiA4tc>S}V-SKt_m-smUCr*$6^IKilnn^b3-(shCtlAkyJeyuz@y>S>z1|9G zbNrsEro8{fUd7>RFS?`p{lmaP3r_pTaeIh>9o~ib&U;s=+QM3%$qwq(P?wl!kL%a8mHYA1vE4j6vx zmTNEF#;YFUXW%4%_?=HZ-?;ay1AnA`q{i>ZV|#u5#s&Xef2bQy`@3D)|HT8_pK4)v zY^h)W#ltVZ^RGKB{yM|shxo&5&phg$Gx|^6=!Vn&4}LxFGgB^K(p?VU*`JTsA5j0o z^cB%N7+(0S+GlQi=a^|uJSTYUJPAH4XrAA04zIrexDRZQCU!n>%St>2xy-Gpl% z_wL7Tj=gF+=h(}_-cgn7GVdOE>y2)FtS?idAFlY_?yGoTzMMYh_qEd=KmWg*zUJKr z7Jt|diRFG#`UiAocDjPQYP#w!4zAey;;(;)enh}$y;%_b@xFIGep|U-Gn{_D+p}Ql z;0?d2arNovKKmVi>R*OuUd(Wo6YIsmA$R@c;nUCjGQ<0v_p(- z_N_~PHgxbcw?6HLGya!WHQlxIpMQQh!~2g`eTFYtmAmH7w&xyYc;x{a&T@aTZPg!- z$h~xl8_se(^ti)jJ@Mf5a=$=*=Fg1T=S`nj`pko_KI32Wz_B-d{i5T&cKM0rh)N~p z$an@TwH&wo+iqQ?D$!aD!+T?Z@zMI`{~rrI`O}L0iZH8n>Lb;>q$jH#|Yhk?EWE!O;2#zkOdV^%+k6NjGf2 z{K*S0JIM{Ff3**td0y3$w|8ZDe0P8T-noC*s*{@zE{~&q`)mBHCwp#t(w6r>z4yb^ zXE^;^c5G_$glixAi5pJ;e%?R-7n!erw_Lup&V1yXwcqb6U09u}l?It$g^fJTad-&7;z;E81`Sej+@5S)!UjBA8 zDRjYKg3q2c%?)S%Y;#`i9s6H$@NsT9^Jn#n37x0?^ENp;3V8h(>@$7y-u}|1Q|gv3 zcEedeYbNh9;|~jx<@AO2^!va1w|o8b$B#_$TA0{pIQxOe#!PzT?5F(l>-AA4e(r?0HM%+;s=A6$FDJxgzVdO5?Hf6V`{?taR3Q*Yk-LxvX} z|KEP$rsdDh%JBJ#F+Jln|Jjcp_>cFm%bYs@m(=fd=6UTcn{MygrSS-c$ET=1{onq^ z(~mgtxg&CJIQ_ri=6il{*^J(o+;IB;*`^=Pd2Q8E&oex?mp}ify!6{UKHTZOaz9_O zi$DHE^`VsqU(;09XE@`(aEA{+bI`BPx{vnrQGfa$Ja+op!42Q~f*a2H-TL2bdggQA zS+$Pg(Y^it9ryenwj4WWqUoZw{_%Y+%%4+t-Pm{g_AOyIoc_&i`)&26U1rR1!E{&eqiUqAYwzdb17CKKKpFMpUHaSJ5_s}mio@u$~LE54xn zBU#wHe_H66WrsdkPG>Lp{NC2~AI9GLd*AoU^|T-1{2tYw5ASzH*MIMQw!|UrYzW~g z!ym3rnd^Xb^Fe9K35;OobklKXL~Bv-!Z!; zk$#-vAdJ(n(i$M;>H&VX>AM!^fWWquZLkdi_QT7eBp;zxkWUc`w(|Gpz}) zq&p9P27s4L`0DqEcOUn+&9>+DR3feUNPD5lnh)Uv>Yk6)?tZR>Zv&neP=duiDF z(@y)ZUV3h=H@dzJrvK;-uuU-#Pg=Gf!C zdNFC+3+$)q9eeKH4~C98^e+;=IrhATn+ThqZ7&9UuiyIEHD?YT>&-7W#~z;xaP8$_ z?=O89bf14?U3tHN^^@zncNQNuyyx5}cX0JNUT=Hr$#dTNMe=<&oa6P*e|~Y?#rM8& zy&KN{eB~|^zERtDLwQ}p_}QNx{?z4Hy}10vIQ9GY@we||c6w~`hMt{QmBY96hd;e! z@Ynz7z2QQJR~+FFU%A_t3&}^H_xe&Vzn%S%`y$_X{L(G!2dSS&IQy3^rW_G_b<>lt zFnj>}Pwc-!myJL9+HJqw?1oeS?8h(uW5u^0c#Pq(DOzu+KmYLKHoUy@v{NNq%A5Tv zk>kSJM0$lcsWEbrjx3&E>4v>4W-YwyC-1!MjZ0#OdPI&Z&8@B88j1e&L4OdKzUG^& zj!Iv#9m4|$sJ|R{PTTXtqqlf_@MjDUA)MpRpC_C<>B=R|hcG;faE?1?-F5F^@{xzj z<3SwZk*&1c4mszV=lkxdSwj6R!s9z@_+F3HeCeIDwm663IfQe(*|7E7uT6OFVlTOp zPuXL+U^g%i z8~{eJe^&{t1?GSSU=bL=zElVp1!jS9U=COS2C#2a1RVk$1;&9{U;&r|2C=Ua2j+nT zz!I<)`wQI1$bjwv4g&jt!@x?cvm?M-U;s0del4%FLC1kPU=~;e7Jvb)FGIj6 zFbj+WbHDmcV5$(|B_kFybG2RBLiR>f!5L5qq{QivLI%PL;5I?V7p}qAx@^1NvipUSFQ2WD< zJpG{_Q@8kNs&oez8+^^2giBO#N8? zm~D|~Zhm*;{Iz1{Ncy~dLVxSliy-!^ZN9YMU0|P>LH+9m7JwyS2>BlY#(*hc7MKSX zfkEVF6qo^a1ABo5;2^LB3?ZEnV9ZH(1pcKgzDeJE%s(Rg(#PR%7c7w;|nrX<~?RTu*34pgSO?Q-1@;MGQJYpNeSWP&xApf z#_~_>%mLrqs7HwS5t^mxp?n0iEhqZ4>$VH>ZNJ5C26ial4ce9yyD{*4f#RC*c}_pz z@b4NWefNOBrkv_PK>P^I_NT8Bv@Iv`eINStmwu2x*|A#-JCsj@w&lcb82m0E?bhz3 z?KZCVk@OXzPx)ccww&k(=V(3<>Bj)}+am}ke+LXitQX|(0Y1ko z;fo(B=uSH7Is-u)})P2ilesyBY8YfMQ1YS&To! z4u2W^pudz~3H}UW;3s}m&GWaDC}>+w;yWJttZ!n%=6f4~mfbAuP`(GWEhqZ5;OBv~ z%jZD`9sXHkH4-;{*Me`?4@qA|#Gk$pXj@MFI0yQyZ}fxwg-Dx#*p0&uwjw4dv7_}8MJEBgz1@>yTRj`-0JeaaU>+j0`$F!)5#7k-}W z#?Siuf!~UN`MLGz6=er50}6;AG3Zl11=^OA_@0Fx^G!&b&-tnF#cnU`P`&`#mJ|If z_=7;&t--ymz#;zhO+$v!U&_w_{~=-ECw_#XPx%_qww(AuefldVY`#6ti`_2Rp?nUs zEhqYM@cV$Y8^*bR(c!-~$~g5p_(vmc0^&#TP=7yA1=^MqKWLZ!(hu@&zr}6}b|{|( zZOe(>DEK`<+U5PGg2U%JiRD50C(1`b+j62G0KXO}`oiy8qWxUf;h%tZ#(s?3APW;#b`mCR{OTImik@6dc9m)q6YI`=ZIv@IugE5T0#X*a$t=6?=<{V4V5i{RfO2JjO<`k~MC6+zo_ z;>U(j>Jj+|(WpVO8#+?+iS;M~+LjZ$!-y}2a4{qN*hEcV#^G}vL!>;PgYR|ZZ^V3< z>7)E6@Xrtie&Y8a^eJBgZOe&&H$k826B9Py?hnLnc(Fe}YCzj^qF(`i97wypxJTXP z@E;$i&eLDYzYMmz0hZQ7eL!`;ztwoS$>R< ze7nCByMY>ic~^qA<;3nF;tM03b~AWxpw{8fM~2Z~$}a(bFJa&(esn>f@;T79ocOT_ z`fmEjpGl(z#cmOHC_fC^mJ_>u;0KS<{17w34;-oWDB|!R7^Q#yG5FUxex#t!^kqTY zauOfyy8RLP_IgRuSAZSL4}!Mk#BLAxB_Pws`|y>Y^QZeJI7)vhe=iv8o%Gc}pYn0g zww(BJ7X(-yv`hZsj@=yWP`(eeEhly};12+4H;i-dVTa$2ev$rCz7za*$B(LGHGe1{ z1#QcTAJk`gxOOKycC)ZU`5w@=oY<`eKM$l`KDRUI@Gn9?;PzAG&vX2!I8M_?`4DJZ zPW*^~Poy6uoS(%JPJaC;^Zm2HxBD5X&)v{xKKFvQ<;0KEq0f53_{g8*q;Cjz%JNGz zy|$d#EkLdk;j~+Ml=cHrhrfQ5db9!jWsVl#lNV|PlpZ7X`TnvNE zH_BfQzFm$|j|QPn`4VVbPW-qO`jf15*!=x0zSs>f^S6^4(6*fDSAZV}(%<4Ztw&uB z|NK$f$+h4=;rP)9eWq^!v@IuoTsBHOA>ZytC4Iq|rjPZg3bZXJc83sO6yZ!?{6I}# z%Hcl-N9ix+p913|Cw)E8r+gl?Ehm0F4gva0yX4#LO43(?9m-c6uj#er#BM+2LI|hb zids!yjl(}2{Vn~a{4(&@IO)qkpYq+HZ8`B{A@n&u&@TBi9J>RsL-`@lww&1Q1wXLd z-`*>5udK@9ZyY6k7l412<3}y@nZ7h=TTc9-U6u#aN4`DZm-5TQ4(0nn+j3&J3;ZIG zc8j<_TycUw-OEPl$Ik$NA18eg=resW(6*fTaXj?tFa03@Xvc0h>`=ZJv@IugQ{WeX zv|Ge{b;#jAGD`V91OBd#AC)UKf0({7Xj@MFcpUolmwu4H(6O6_9m;osw&lcb4fr`A z?dEY`zu)209{r^}{k8jNsYk=mr+n~4O|LB{e(VJQ-SL6^$xixWutWJ2Xj@L~R)L=d z(%-7_+Q0NV{Ecvw{!;!*FrIY$7=%9MOQ3Bz@#9 zz>foIw=@mopTmD}l=all!MEGDlwTk8nZ5zgww(AuyR0AdgZxEK`hqJpeUz^PZOe(> zA;cF&IPDg(ub*=G4Fa?$<@2CzIq~Bm=+R#xZN5Ek7P}?bp?pQH zrq`Ae{eH-W5Kg;!+$XGY__vJGzmRYHEq-L6&-8VJw&lbR>a)Jl5Ax>;13$4l06UZ) z0&UBQ-CpnmCu{n}gz))(k}8LP_&AM({!)Gk_*-kR_rLg23w_F`LECZ?-$LlKJZP8v zV;sAA*r9wsXj@L~c7b06(r$WdZGRP?_ow^)QRdgkA*MoBny4Y_kgzL#E(4qMB1%dr1g2w@nf%1)>8+9zg7(3 zCw^3{()2T*L!fOr@nfG+)>Gs!qEUllHx4^&uNly`oY;+k-whNq!cSqn(dY1Q8fCoP z1b&m_#}M?HzQC!PURzG$qg~bu`a!-u&P)2DutWJ;(6*e|tpq;}q+PymqsQSd93_3H zfWK=wA)3$q&?mbH+LjYP7D1o>(hu^dIQbS@t@%Xx2xwbQ><%No7{Y0n@2ki-{98sz z-#y^(=J?SIeWtGf+LjYPZi7DS8~q^vM8|F*uIZzEC1_ht><%KnFv4lKmiO-+{vBx0 z^q2B?g5U1=(FJ|V=Rn(X;s^Cv9R71byanMV+SCmJ>gy z&wQgFiz8`3fh(vy8-ZPfwWtNbx+peuZI8hm-6-CHvt92k394#-w)cB6F(Br z+tSjv`G;G4v0Krg>7#rIv@Iw4MZ_0DxR?<>pUaLreAX-aOZioZ|4N{M_|Xl0%J+h{ zzp$Ug>gu-|g| zwtev<27St>K-+Q>Ulx2K?bd{`|Ka$-a-vKL#B?N~8Euu}0HNq}>4WBaCqJ zpFz2>{K$V347OY0iyv|5Q$7RQmXrK=6#{O5ME*=Mh@aT)gB{8bfVSntZa4TtKrtcw zBF?jdDSvsthB)Xi}Jy1aWh(e$8wV-V|iSK>rv3?3^^I49<7rQ;ML-{;tTTb-T z;P(S*H;a2HC5QjsIFb11efFKOe{qurd;g0cp(f2ArY{28mh;j9yYyEK*nE5cUF>FH zhw|N^Z8_18f!_e%x)(VU*I%N2l=C&hf$w?F+TF``KH*7!Y<`&LECbY zj!N*;K-$gXeS19)|LsxA>0R)bhynb>kACR0oQj}rIq`#b>93fu`Fqi*L9rV;UGt6d z5zw}r=no^l7{Y0H2=|aO4u3TYg8ovT{L>vjdZADG0%%)K{GdMlb?w^gYOh{2`_oqm z+LjZ$gNQGTaN6yer2TcR!{@#>k@9KmZ+AKJEGO1a%9GE2PWa+?AM`0d0NR!lzlXpl z(ryUvF9@#H^ppSoDD&y9QSa=05kI2PXSvjZw&lc+4`A2zkNjiB0sO>n5A0Ar589R! zyJ_(Ifnq}V{n$4sIs8S4gZV~z@_DWyeDNdH;_o*iplvycF9tr5c6;!?=?ucjpFc`I zlYfB-;wOIeLZA6u0By^OAJlj2KlygM6}y2}r~ZSs<;3nF;tL~OToXRuCt2(8H;vN1 zZv+2oCeEPv(FJ{`F9+I|llX3dzMDSs?eRnG7Ga0-!=P&pVz&T0lph3b%ZYvu_$8p|3x5#v z&B`3(FC`uQyQ`-lPj#E%;2GktN;ww%QG+fn)f@)y&nL9v^I9rgo#plvy^n*o0S zC}xCTz;hVG4*wa{Bl=7ESHb_TFz^#Us@gPvC?5rF%Sn8+OMk_L&7Vf22E}d`b|~Ki z+LjajTJZBg+O5L-LIxfFiP)z_a=ci@4*B-{MEs~|*Yr_71lpDp{RsF(`Vl%v$H6$l z$v_#2({rJ>LCb%D0!#EP<{xsEhlz+!4GWkw}&|1_fzHY zIUX_JBucSEzMX&KM=kUzp9XEqiGCOOMA}U)*7D9fe%ykzGT$hF5BNU@3Wy&?=u>_e zv@Iuo+y*`7n~*kt7QzL@ZsbhOH_FFA+j62G1V057ec|)H&)p86^CkLAd6u8O{t-V4 z(5L($Xj@L=n=FRRkN(QvHlO{V@WpQB7yaoAgSO>Fzl8W|5Kg;+u3A8OIcJts@oaOHadhy(1 z*x{cr%Dj?%yM9Re;?QS5kO6JWi67nI6Pdn2ynn9G@#A3l!F;3qJn*k|@?!}4W%;u; zy|$eAF$?<4H`*nCzGF8EJCv^lZOe(>O7PP_+8sDa+eweZzY!T$_SYzgotwZv-|?d# z`jjt%w&iSnw;!P0DURLHIsSei0@{`nyTgbthH$1Yg?;vn!)O0A-ilA`kZ+F@QjdC} zPx%69TTb)`!6(v>VLaav$olK~vQg^M$>5)0`6qsaq0fA-0d32PAIC%AK9{lic0VI_ zyI_a%IncJ8=*PkD12TOvyho?#@K+(j=r85T-{7P#xKZQU1Iq`$~ZapG@FUM{Q zb|{|(ZOe(>DEK`<`WwK0Wx?Sejd)luC{O+#jvpoHQ@-NMnqFH@{0M7md1s(c`EJm*ocPfTK9P3wcu(bk<3|$;j^#)BGr-td82E`Ffph)k zT?yKj6F*LezUv?Pi)qxL*sX;f%BMlwa$+|Oeiu;82)}^&L*C)DeiWcj`9aXOoW$1&0hR~tlE1{UTY0{wkMd#Aww%~4A-)=f({6DA=6??Vlu`QI z)!-lQ_>qG?)7J;umJ>f#L7)8#{UG1&N2UCRVTba;uV{L0Ik7tcxhjOyF26?_bNCOy zQTj{yN5SCuCVcTD3w_G>fVSntk6%E5gJK-+Q>-~F&le`%NeMFl&mD6+z@#rwc}96$JeEF$G& zc+R-rkw0XVcC`fjO=18)$-iOfvs{7~YChO<;@=|ZGoQtT&A0n=u^WRO%BMiva-v@a zeilf(z4%^Aufx9{8O(g9Jo$SF13&R&5c-rafwtwukBYBqx`|>!_%WR8h7nHwfrx|i zG?&l)5aEj-ap+S%1KO68_`1O-(ryjL`98;wH;^!vALZW$-|ip9k0I!n3ss~seLfZU&5H28gL;t1uMEMA4TTb+c5nl}9qA&cw1np-s4*#rC<}r7Ie~}o# zPyFbGKGRnKZOch~7eJroAtr3T-S3Lsz{Q$A%2$H6;q)kBl=z>1emji9fi63u5pZ?Mh@)tOEi?BoaVbHdm*zE&9c!}l*?G9qy5pnoq zMrnULfp71#NcvLHXZo_BZ8`B{>rvVt`7@pL6<~+y8w733iQOLXOF*Wt7W)sCm-^E^ zd6fFOANb20KWd=Q^uf6OTL zb0_dS9Y3nNHGi1CC}>;GE5A|d=hooQaO`GbhvnA;+LjZ$wczK0OkdY5ZGVFf|H@J7 z=hfi5{dmP?{`7@F+j8Ou?Xo=R2l;lnNWG844&^hTZ8@`=ZIv@Iw4mEfm=qA&aazH8Fs z@GrzXwCpeBF9ZJ|F@T@=(GPvf7eU){65lZR?)z)P_%1}~a(_R-_)u-U7{w0xd(jDl z;ztbnluv=S^g4d*3WH1^^fp5Jj<&{;=51zz*wCH)vZf-gFf?_evogsTd^DL@we|P(6*e|9YTCjgwt*X zzT1&<_&*+{-aQQdIZi(JK%eQ$gSO?wj|WGocjVjcMbcM-9p*>H)tX*gPVDwWE`)HV zZxHvqY8*c2D{#k4jo2Zd@kxOAk%2ztyFuG>qTdTXk$!aJd9ne=k2#oUG2bXZ5B!UT zfuHyh_=dlISAw?X#1HDTKN1r*->&~+w-$CNp9XEqiGCRTE+FmlJM4Lff7>YS{nPX zC{O;jjvoc+Q+^P%Ehm1Iz$emf5$}7d{HCUde4hW&uFK!Y@uLR%l#he9<;0H+_(a+b z;(lSy@#8WWq+QCBZ`+sh9&r2^8pRLlv;4%a=vQ6qFW1rZ1CWaX=~pGb=a_Q%SC3L} zIlnnb4B#hz^gy5WHV@jCll<%l-~Db;0PmSAIeuI|iXT^je;u7LD1L;#_`N_eBmCUwwEYY?{4vNd<{Rb5gK?+hN8mbt`YJ)& zauVM-=+j@?CEp$&CEsdchw^FAww%}vgWmKJxcLxPaIlh8@ZWZ_xDGa$`;CHv@IugyTKm<(ry&bB?iCk zPxr2)q;Eg)*E)Vgq0jWyg0|(vkIB$ye?dRUxBErOw;tG`d>*tdCw9}|_XBA+gME~e z!#@H3(_hN31mE8G7e7KbY5q_?0@{`nKTd=`%Y$~wx7(}O&A<-jyFuG>VmAhUFOYV_ z9RD2ts!__X6Z|Cn6c9fGH~Z693EGwuKWLZbK|jd1{T92mutWJYXj@L~hQaRw(r$i7 zjDHUQ-cizbKlrza0sO>|BJ^2)!=P4i$XV9oYu^ZW>`9}E|Xj@M7gW#ut zv|G#hzr!Ct%Kp=~;Q!e1qX2!TZxFOCCw@$XKFfoCkZ+#{N%|^#HGPy1gSO?wZVB<# zAe?sNyI}lt_+K1l{z5*-E3qSfg^!FSL9hw$CLKF5!3 z$4LwyeUHQT;BVAm?|<=Q$nhg^o2J*66F;cWd=mpU|6s>%6m}?I3)+?w{YvoDK-wL~ z`FM}RpEOE4Spfb`jvxKdXFeA}+j8Q^uFz+@rXS?n{j=m-=yrcU5CLt=iQQqu7ehGh z#&HiWPl)oN)yPpw1dZADG0%%)K{1^n^-FNN7xkKO%e?4CegS1OOjs=7B z1>uVyVdzu72DB|FejE(})(hGt|3G2jCw9AFhw?elww&0FgWm@f6T+`Re_M3;SHTbZ zOZn@;;Jiop;z#g1nm?4U0&UAld{;xjtw-c97K8YS-4yIlJ`38G6T4CHdw^m>_=7Wa zJSjN*-QWlPrTk1VwucV_;ztSkl&`o`(`(B~e0xBE{?ab_%N)BkutWJcXj@L~hQQAN zX}1FJ&CfafS4QdQUIqUY$BzN%Gkrs#Z8`CS`fj?(pW)c8%KP&v3fh(vy8-ZPf#vj} zAILiVnTUt}Ql9HHyM9Rd<)Kgce$cj@_`!7o+Y{}QZ?AL3ZpC*seUuM@w&lcb5%EP3 zPP<*$_lrCHS#Xs8QhpH__Bu)Y=!QP!dqLZB;>R2au)fhQ`SXN>MT_(6XueIgOHh+<0w;y&W zUj%K-iGB|JVW5~1ejNAhLw9MukpJEB8WH_<`4?%h_rIhs27St>K-+Q>AMLWfxpoh7 z?DoPAYKgi$7NyjkkQa<>7%@c#(!uOVA z4*%Uz>dSlJKjrw5h5i`udqCTA;s^EVFa03j?uRAc24RQtCD68<*v*4q@dJOo$nT-$ z6n6M`jWQlR3clUm#E&@inZ68YTTc9V0QzjdOdt97JkP5autWI)(6*e|?FN4cNV|g= zZ-e*v)15>)&|k`*4n9#x@goX-%GZLn<;0IQ&}VrFY4i6(xPaL0fgQ@{LECbop9a4l zDEh*W;yWiLhkqUFAwa}EdGeW`!WTb6eVRX%kASx2B)%B1mZ(_pc+xaJU1NUnBC|?QMmJ|I!#1}?5?N;Hv47Cn_ zA{?c^l;0MNXN7^E_|XM@%I84aa^lC95TL(e!sZ`NqXxxp5q2m)4BD0x{XX!6_xamH zFW#>narkE;9@YyX#SZy5AzVQGNI{?SSp`99FL zoY>8PKLDh^H8@8ccK8=#9{}!nv5Fn?xA!>upZHPrLw`RI1#QcTel7S!`jMKc{XiDs z+Tj?GaF z&s7Z0Q!D`oB1-4yD@H!6Sb2!zFmUitrTZ2r_8g`dI$W_A*cDYewNSC<2*m+lev#7M zM=BP8xy4Fnk5a5S8gjsNjnc7W6vLlW3?8dk0%nd=x^{_TWT|2Sm|LcFHl`RqUNO2{ zF?51rV1;54SU6GX+)0Yrm5T9N#pub3q0cJ@PEqUvroNzb2{^Dy>HMjR-K!PTam83d zaS+&7r*u!fVx~c{HmMkCR4f2%)+k+-QmklF90KM~Q@Z53M}0n@EY z$I^=7GZceuiX~vCUFq5m#Ym@OeNi#>CB>Sv6bFF$ zvz6{XN3k-iI1C)zsC4|xibKHubCvErPqFKK#ne|6Yc5c%>Qc-Di@?H#ko&6Q05E@% z(%t{1n7&vsc8Oy6QpI4mVhK2KnbP^MDMl_=EC6#?C|z}>V#U`Lhk%t=DV+mmdz6k} z4LM-{H(%rW!R${+!7&!PH<@aIVs3)&<2KxfF-%~nr7xeE|%mGv1 zSGwj0idFY0R`e-$1Jm~^9lK94e7|Dwhl)MG&;v@d|ISn^9kKYP|9)><^xwp7K&RVU zJCgMs$%e(54zL2Dz}PXB_v&~w{1dge)ASoAZ@2i$M@2@)gP9N}R^U0r_+hFyfbY;n zuGa@SDR8v%`;G@fZUFib$OjJ9 z@E)x1YmQL53s}TCcocGdkPG2Es}+#T;yJJ2Y}L;ro*~R{v-qxA5$Dd`xPM*2bt3#L z;CaRz?uQg{kD?#%Q?CLY!gC*S#GAqU00MZPE^w0i5k+_&`vy`hGQL+mq~%rv6u#7h zt>h2$BXVB2G_f|>o=(&!HQ4)K>OpQQ>es`H^J914miyh|-nP359~%bW*!F&VUi+=j z4mM8ms+Z`;5MJt2e;4d}#i|E?_4~U-Sp3;e)dED;&ldXAK2kBoUK;kgfxo`x{3ZXK z`u)Gd-aC839x;w`8Q4YRkD&e)ao;_KdX`5$8jz-cK2;@|>4Ta;3Zr$d4ir`7vs{Z)mMQ zp`)#-Wz9(T1|)yk?n^(@@_su1kMuJ~U3>xUeNp}}KjN862A0*GX1bA3dwpv<8ES0G zB-=wBsbpwfvTZ}i^fC3x_V&>FRBL-ORNvat(Uvf>P3@sXd%FopHXLGcThg5!p7PrE zWb-;>r@f=8xjEF9XjzjCwHkw=gdtlJ9i457=Jx3!IAFk=UvnS!=cu=aFZGQ666yB| z;&4N#K9Nq;H8nSNYzVDsYwc`lXb&~D)HioFBtyxJI9uPGXj(fp)aoU3T6;QK-_+Pt zFA3;eo9<|8ZE2rsjI^}2G}R}XLy5MIruxq2gam{VEe#=KqEq-@deznGDlcDxxM~5lcsU~8^+uGSt-?}!bt{8!I zqAk&pY~ElL>s#9zOa?&0cFW68wwHYW=H=%KQ|O82j%1rDpr&<6_;*@sQ%grE(a`E; zRcL)vM~hU5x=vFIOkpE;&P=wohU$_n$;PIR8TGC09ihfVQ?phiPuKX_ZjxQ!F%42E z4-=8?xYUE8n6{IeU-9*Jl5Nu$uWM>Zw$vx5 zAFZ`wE67bpE!i(UGt{0+RL_|knw?C}o83?!nLBgdtVqNVa~kH(s+$v@H*?zLbxltnsVr73)yaAFb@ho^)!}5a zer99!oW$H@q`DR%B*FxG`D% zKgLqcwERb7ne}gr1#Lmfy9W0l0{`tV?-s}q*MeS=GTl#8OJlOlG)8GiBe@+i1#fDU zw5#^cdg-}Z+d}IS&7G!WYinKW)!1Yv-P}~))DddwTx+E3O&^zB+hlq-Q?*m3Et!hh zo@`s^bpYk6DSn2rFJ5}Y?`JFgBGO;a&qP{c)81rlYeTZxcy5}QiBlSnY30(eq!DZL z>PVT&x+Y~eEi`YDmNsM>e?w?ZtLZ;YJ8Lm*Dq#$k`%>|f<6_S*{eE(vme^?Lr{~*& zrpHdMO_*FY-D5+-IMx=DM$}RW((Hb&b?=REYqA*Q5%y89i#+wmGB%k{5zSiuo{P`3|zeilXnf>6pgc)|sD6>pQ zl=c%kggQco%#U;}UItlx*X%?%Ie%9DyvVHC$=S)qxz&v`tLG<^v*%XNtZ$rG*Eq9& z{w&iuHbmw&&TpJKdrrg5IrFO%4fTeqn>%;@tkEJUcU%9d2+BRyzZ`*A+EOlY%=arE z^Op>YB|=+jJc=Pmwu~=?;kK+Alf zy;CQLW~fg#H%b#XJx*u6&hkR7>sw6xb;(9E>dr_sN_WwgT-PL38N)kkw8Y5)=@5&`jqM1%>qYyBaVoVg7R;W>@7>gR^TbLtayv*sitjp1@(Aqms{ z@szXbUycVAQR-p%Gg=Sxzw_6_V<1DU0liT69+KXA0<(HkqcF*^)X6ca$nUXUzQM2}GH?v2xQZW;#wMkj=VXu!bl8-F<6MHKp69o3dYPx6E)ub#-H8W+XX#_T0INIf=U2)uuBG&r8&Y6Lr;d z=g*&4Juh6}Xxif3+4af!iTXLS=b5f;Zg_5Fet2HP%#YNaPbY|XBS(A&h&O<7rzn;jan{xNN2 znzx#o;f<{`${V5eX5DP+=K9vQX0r!w64ulvJ>_Y}SFa^X1M6%wO|i+0<7HPpKlj!A zi~Py&=Q+qf;@O}VnvS={+o&+>ycQE}y*D>79IqfK<$l8w#DOw&5E#XtQcGaS?I&G?)Qo2`fB-1&`>+4VE) z6SEtVX4Ye7HP!Rx%uiOEz18~a`Ewc@>#OI?YnUI2%s2ZMb0Q71>+0(DG)>Z%uhMeq zdB$HZ>~D$ecNfYcx4czoibM9}buo`UJKX@oiG!)VX02~F#ag^(Ap8Ewc2hSD-zykq zwU>M156`bMMZZ6+7ewAmGwXFdqtU9{TG!mP#v2vP`9`|6y~*3uH_LNxs_5;~wIoHr zG(qExnPHl(1!F*tXiScqwY=G_lA7U-6W(sbv~d(=;C| zp7s09Luz7sxqdg89>Pp&rGb09h2GIaxzdlE&7h6iM>JE7D{|Pw-bFWiy`ik3vn^@r zGnCqrXLL51CS$io?a%Tn)Zc>RFZW4_Bm1Svkln28p1@>QM^k%wx75ouZ`Zc1!<0g~ z^YG4Mzq}Q)#(*FYP5^TDZ5D zZ>pZ}Kn#6?FZ(>dvN%_$eZil9o$!Omb|Ze7Bf+)i$V+>4p2_JRp@~*D%rz4l%!!-K z3%&d`n}lmkYII-_3r!u~CbgN{cbGFX>8(t|S%;>y)*PJFcbYAmW^037>SHbLGn5>E zm%?8n_sP9;5KJy50(01D#&|8_20fk8^F%Y^cDCs{LpJbbPTOkEpsn&RXP)>GMt_}q z(VuUN;Ro?ZyF9%P+Y}il5@wW^R>A&S8^csH;F@C$(Lq{t zEH5I7A}?@a+P`7c+1&Di`a@45WjHvcvw((*Rizb(>FcN{-) zXVa@>QV+8@CknmluZNs36FF~Qio^Hv#UIxp>g&F|lOj3dN#ppU^#2RRk@R>_?$-d2(ACwX%` z>#B*#5^u6@^3_}Rm=RFtc5-3Nnox~QxxKO444wA1KYFL*bPn%b9(Me@0{KV09JKMz zEGK1cC%Zak%H>=wF%#*v>1N%_C>O1FInZpm@RnYEDp`NJxw(;+(NcGi%sj~K7kG2D zk>!A{TFtm>HcFbz0A~IwU;QyhAZK(Y>aA(4H}4n>YyIeX-Jjnr7%z!yH*@@4YpzZ< zERl_umNjM=wTA9;N6OOxlNfV1NhaUcp!zQ#)N#01(06XThGdt4VH;^tkR{K24j}qjUjV9YO=IEW?0*BmLL3X zdcpC7{XUWX|3c~3KkgQ=>14faX)G=@YwwGOzwoj!ArXr`dj zG`Qj{Z&~P)%Gw{K|5iEkd(B;M`}1uA`fVcLllw{YVeLE2ezbM4_K_aEywv``e{Rh0 z6o=pO=ieffEAa@>GVjnl(mlqHyOSA0ufc}eZ1(!hbx5zjuxpysdwxea{jNX$(-0rA z$%=8RCeNW~w1|1|ub-=A|4Kk>_;O+SXmEoA3rWYd`*(kSbN`39 z+513x`nociI6c{7x@EWTv!<+{?gRb*xDQnRj_dpWa$kXZN<0DdqK}{5Xl28)6g#%w zNUp=TKKaF^thv-b(rH*#QR*STyIS>u-=A$T4imTD%=MHtuINz_2gTWfB5n4@7?eJ}Sez%j_7{pHHA zUNbODW1}mJ6CAuBVupQLujq}5^5WSXW}9ms-rX{}Dem3mlr4I_o^@KMc`<-@OW9q} zc;h|ZpHVf@pRNSbL5zc57?Nj;%sIPkA@PAVvvM|zNwd&Tw3+RJHo22vc4B33POloZ zn~M?a}u$a#TzDsyDZ z_0taYlbB-Cq}hZRc_D*$8^^kDFSk9pGa`QSyQSf+{Pm_0^@f-P{Ymx4OsmU{$V_Cti&b)O z;{&U+umr}gN6Rgd`H)j_9x*q(`-+pfK%6fv6&lBs*{f;?}F}+KZcSNMKGVlDOylCcy22TJTx}Yp4?c_?^*S$3H#?LFD~huV0jXglT5*G(%?jQEnX)O?K&17~+Ur zUzB6Nspicqr-a^!tz5es_QF&TALeYv?SN#p>%f2rd%Zcz&O1JP;%nuy%i$wUr0SGN9>*J zwaF_-(rr!Nd4%`c5jl`Bg_vl-0|7GKn8veRQwz++2)^n==IWZmoX515xA#5&_&vyU z(4Rlt&nI%fPyCae6z>5R`>aim0=>Ka-rdZkJODFtGJ&HJ-{bt=iG!10{C;C_2fsh8 zM?~KDUdX}JyZPHTgN4!D)N;CJlVpL_Vx_*wT&|qSyx=Ty=CU#$tEt~0XTc^{8>h8; z&ykd?m6vb)4r9*olj|trs&e}@^H>b+-g{-Rz2)6N@#d0zbBxJdyd$f+B_n4;p zqvmZ?reEPff7vmwUE)1pH9PwAZvp%u9$NN`r?_6x$>iP4S>;eb%5P+c3fple5pudE zued2k>*WXEPgZo|%_1J+Iaa*x;fnVJi&+-POSWXL` zw?Zf%$9R(#>3HRMOAp1(0lGP!ma_F;At8@j`TALYudsF}e}0__KZzSGzj2n25c>_-3uOGGXp6e`G!}QWvZ!NDam7nzUVb&&%P0g?XaEd-s%igh}2sCDqy6lP`Drs5;)7(==WY;Nsgq zMX@WA)FXZmF|~`o9!=Ol7$5mCxAw7~5-wiK zr$d!aG*o!xxWb!Maw#a?n(j4>44mQ@zdIML^yk+~Noj$*-7a3&q#3K(4R{8O}ajD(>`NVP~viw$f_e|wkFd3Jn))?gT z9DJZ|3AK^6kLYC4AOnrJHD|`!#2T6E$`uh2giR~|_&vBD$Im+WMNEJ;`Ns*U z*OX*C&nqkQNT!L-8_%c7WMA^N0goS_GgYv)&f9J}3woUimrT4D;<34S;|0IdR&@O4I+V!u=rZYR#k$#^>@<({m}+2Z zr}uI!@5Y64Uh(nSu{C-)%@#jmZUqrsQ&D;YWxf?lJ znUrsyqZGZd-nW**6x5`{>ysoOQ{HeVxhdldpZ+%8fO&_H=~m0NP3MpNE?I1Ee?GGR zBU=5Sb^Co}F6iws$j~O&;zm-&MU^*%>XjdHewQJX|s$F|L`BMaO@ccfJ{nY_@%!dKHy6nH* zS=Q=a6wSQy(DfGTDd))(_hutQ^x$`-20PE{aTfXoBG2{v`(v~Hvh3XXT@;2D*(3Ak z9^Sn#Z|I!9gOn1LSjGD*Gk8B?2Ux`W@S=DRTOIGgO5i<8P2liB zcfP5N_t#YMzL*5wYtjW)@E(u?-oG&dHu0W_Jl@AJ2G;RjfefCD?*prNK0Su#u4}*y zo-6JHOL&eqhUYq?c&@I7=hsqr?rH$6;JKw7o{Jg(#o1NC^ByTY_s|5UaE^ZfEaAL- z9Ou6CIM>_qk!{TV_*a4O|m%W(8sxg67FBe zaKCp5tm1xN9QR{7zyj_EjGo})u7>^X6!vfXz&!R#$G|G~0aMuj>H;&^R~iFb*bm5I zy*&oju%1j}z0?8buud5QE0}jDF;DCQE0~uhFb`=0(-_}Jz$(VC1p3D=`llS*J=$AM zwL9q_5@=^lMfbLrHa-dc88L=yZ*niMo%iR(^4@fieUR@7U|TAZ-p%>>qd4==8l~crbNGyK~-_fx2 zGQLM*>HKbsrFZb%6-(#$T`avF;?F3)vts%CM+L`K@}OXP>d0U}^g{g4@5|V7J9`Jq z&*42I*3VIVx7*5ThUk+BiD!Q2#>&a!`BY1f;Jpu)&hO+{I=`1=>HL0SKdU$V><&WTdI&<}f?*UnUejmuvOL(8ArME)j zir*8m{E6Lz?d5leEPwyi!TiHLgXu-|16B^dXJqO8zLBN(L;S<#YiPKL-C zhuD>TNw8fle3#0W%jb(MJ^z$oIeo;T)id|xVE)lQj&AvjA^Jo@`oj*+u~|KPkUvMq z`wDEi{O*+H=Xa4}hjfZyY?{I!sF-3yr~@OxfX4!`eZ>HOZ8rE|Z`()m4cOXqioEq#dh z?%MdthxDH@d|$%K;rC1}o!=L=^a0)rq3Pb=bL+qw=8;Wc2iOOWfYGFzZzh0gU=COW zR)BS23)lq?fMZ~6cPBRq%mDMi60izv0NcPGa0rY%*U5_mQ@|{+04xJ*z$UN*>;p%@ z=pL{imz!tCz9013_*j}(7m;vU2C14fU0JecW;1C!|!G2&0 zm<1MqWnc~11a^RZ;0PFf0qh5QFFW?1r^x|}zzVPq6%!^$42Y)@g)#=qs&lWzBw>2^lx5D+BGrZF~s}ESeejVS05%J}f zAg2br^BJ$MUvdAvdrLN1|L{AM%OHnzelOC}`TfW_I>viT&thI;>HIFFrME)XC!F_q zKA8MO|5Ql1oKIMOj<1%U2w8{lJCRyXFYksYLJQ&m{v88j`?~r|0yDroumr3E8$hy%xc2rW@ok$|p5Z+UzE*wKFrwqI19`E} zpSs&cZ$9o2$)1cXiR3UoFM+%#12u?V+^>kIr}|2MeqWOHK(zU}ACWitTV{R`mY@3y z_08nh^-CQ@f9^B%O@4mYlJ*msS5WeEe;I?dg7LRs zKK38#CO^Nw$?}O>jO6D&LVq*)!~DSk+xidFpZg1Sli!xl zc5KV%en5XS`NQnzzCrw@o3@|r(w5J4ett9gIlkEZ+z+Um{5Jl={Ks{4-{iOc3(L>- zbNs(%?YHq47XMsl=S_aAf0+NdzOI}6R)6l(TK{qV+}}+8C+Lj$TiOrT+3}an+Hd>6 zF#mBqo;UeNrvD4e&-HoTvV9roAgw=%#A zu*3cg?K%Uj06T2&i2Dq%0_?CoATBb%3b4a?f!{K~3a~?e!Y>)+AL%#7n0MtB-SgW< z`kA;Cemu_m=rfyu%-{GO^4bB;@6X%*%KaNVZuc?a5jop{naKX@ptYyT`_&I9uUUIK zR}vzx4LN<_)%*SH*?WCww_k`DFMVrw)1PgQo35==}b=rRPJ+ z&*1wYx_ptt@x{`4pU~1X*eAB-_HZA@@{h1iv;1xB?^=G|hqUx2_DwCF-}kn3eqY>0~rSrSOmd^E|rh9!xXg~kzv)1xxR7Cn!_Ali_Tt9N+ z+a6oLc2%P*osY;_?z*7}k>iH<63sLCtfa_kAb$t=?|(o1isVuEJOgqzcu(y4KO+0H zA^0WH@4s-LG@705*K#X@<2#P~?Am^jlf!*COK*k5O$YnomOp~~;Fg{`CRiWd-?#ky zj;^MQf8CdiA`v3jVF&qN8t`6<=-lT2uj?yusPj+qk)Iv4>m{GOTo^SZdxi4Yq zJO^Rvt&sjFhy6Rt&+n~TecH=H>J8(dZPz?!Vddvv9xR97bF}fxa~W0+zq@GZJg;Ht zJg;HtoR3>Nze{NCs)vl%+_$xIxQ}D$3EaQ3^udx~{}gfG*z)uHbXLzO?pIs-80Sr_ zoG9*3TKWLrE3tC;eKbqYhUm}ljahzv_sf>c?`m240Oyaa9Ddiz(mNr3<9DVke|n!_ z|MR;~Rv+%OS$Z7b|F(3V_p$T}&P`Z4_u(v^_X8|Ff&0mp&T~VSUJQwoddPU1dSbAD z+9CZ(FJyc#gv_5u#|O*L;+&V&KNT`w@jFwNKa2bSw%&7x1((b3KUq0d%&#n+-)XXR zp2Mr%eFTamu`T2b!OXoQ+OXoQ+OXv55ES=x+v2>mb zv-Hf1g6oC*!LoI9Fx$;dwpFU*-3U&3;BbWE?Dq^sD^dh?UQCf0oX3f0o_}nO{e7KiKkD_6=@d zyiaWTc}~#M2RQ#_>HO}9rME)H1%Cfx&i^>~XX#1IXDprP6K%OkoNKdm-fyvVeh0(S zd7jbI`5lTmI`*wCy^r~%rSrQImOlB;gNe8De!=aC_kpaOM993o@SNayDDM?a=Y1k8 zpXUiIo#!+yJrN6*Uklk+;rAn~9Dc{a()ry48z)VykL|jH_phv+>_NeL^1A|7KF^a{ zIs6WQrSrUnr6)t$FYl9Ce!joo(jy`5o%hQuKktKCdf~Ofe&D%~Iewf6xAYF4ue5#} zg!E%=w0A3q=VUFN@3*)0%lF7z{&L7Vi0>b_{Cp3%rStxurRPG%eZB|V`hn+p=j4Qp zzq~(Z`3oWIi%cT89&1kxrt|&ORzA=DSUTU6Z0#zB^uv*-1(#b6**D<(eXacAPQh~c z{#mPMDx_Zc-cie+=XaD%KRntaxZFs{_?QYA2a{VkIo2-T*R}fay^xka7P8OJ^V*i5 z_kFE=zR%Ipdm;1H68df1?s&f2%Hg>JOYev5BbGw^mJM0&^ZdA#&-3G!&iC%jo#)vteGpRaARVj^&%awa z`H*(O_u*N7-v76Bo|m_D-tV{cQAm7tLiDeM>`U-GzLg)}CfE-=*J%0q{yj@CgpA94 zAD-psd+97ai+<0>LvwMko_tT5m6O189+uAclUX|7|7Gb}+@G@j0N+Pt`NtviF+Sg5 z`T2Z_d!|td>@nbfA0ms{?CWZH~9V}D?hV;u$(OJ z!`O29-XklA?;W!A0^et1?vL|5JC>i%h0M_p57v{gm z%mYinDzE`;1AD+BFmkZF?-~cDfLUMxSO(UBO<)Ju2abTzS2(!|U>cYM7J(ID9oPbP zfdk+e7<(n|69Y5AJg@|;0vo_Kum>ChBe-852d02oV1abpzs~{-z%sA~YyvyLK5zt# z@_sY#D<1~`15>~(umCIrYrrP31MCAw!06%dKQIl<0gJ#2unueiyTAc(42&HC{{u6? zJg@|;0vo_Kum>ChBS*r1U<#N87Jy}74cG*BfPLTy7=0D&2d05JU=dgW)`2Zx7dQZp zfw7}tKQIH#153avumNlXd%z(ul7s!g6fg@c0L#D{unFt{`@j(}`fAt@OapVkBCrCi z16#l@Z~zL1V&DP{lFA33oHQ3 zz#6a#>;U_~5it5%*bhttbHF070;~gDz%FnA90Ow~!hT=|m~(umCIrYrrP31MCAwz-R&X1Jl49un4RG>%bPU3mgE)z}QOI56l4b zz!I;p%@=qlI`OapVkBCrCi16#l@Z~z3R=OIUTyYu+5Z#YZ=rTkQ6X@qp1i=iDv;p0#EDUaur$wwrwpzyOi zo>L|tQS*DWIsM15GkK=-a~>%9lAe5?lkbABigdf~qF;&ibDclhz&2d_>FNhTnM~mV89Z&-&xJKJpPQKkJ>(lah~U z`58aF?@vCWs;yHO@;v(06NUKoeO!GnAH&le^ia{l0Wz;R9F`}N9n+|Q=o zMB(F4_?e&giOEMKub}X=T%N}wAJOttZ=PQ#A5rsrw7GWJqyOIG{Fnk3fRbPQ%KJ}s z@Yj%T{mTBDSWdfk*aeC_v6FP(f1tiZ;p0#EnV-+olaEMVL60`qZ^z&2?8^d$Pwe9T zuo3JjBi-7?_YM);7{6lZ=ZC-y+G8H^SAxH~kl#?{%X2_Y%rCo&uGa^Ak5TsTzj?;z z-}DpzH8h@mq0dbnx%TATsi&yPy=SMtUbw*7p9dcPou}{k(C4mvSp49nFRp^_$@YKy z#$Uho*dtDPrCdn`4QWFZ8*;BfW3!36K25p7?F9otKdRuD#!U)$adw%8w;o?BR1` zL_YU-_EemG zr{DA1PajzN+U~-#DS4|yf_0t`$;9rK@BeQU zy~Iz{yA3^r9_057(yiZf@0`|`$m6-IqN0oa^f!_I?x=VT;i+pRj(4{ayp|4*%C3C;Z`4 zL;p2QUU^Gv7rAkt`iUQe&UKQe2iY@*+}OM3<5T(xJ~tt9CBOI2{}HwPwAVh8kkdUR z<39f%WKS%wN z;A=N$^~-}E=D#A+=|8Tkv_GVN*$)sIpDmSN>XpyeQLir2Tj>|f_-zEbo@YuP`AOVG zs?+u^^~!b4LiNh3{Gu1n$%uT3w*u1ZpLOdVwudU{VS3e-T+xgBqzlz+pz@1ee4dqh zjgdZj^{l@V?{)qN(<_B^kt2HX`Rj%1RaW^$FP_(@UNxkrFLwPJ{ng%#UR@phYtLR?&8|fD! z`+-A`7E9ev=I>lrbdmp8KRfgC(M4ygW!|IEwY@@6Sf=I7Mssn9`#p1<>bP&S?K$p}gpzf(T306i+e22kXB^}i+gU(7r!umh<%hZR(c5^^AYJcDNp=W*xvao z^Zr?XX}^jeSkLrB0sLi^&-Vk~%Mb^h{8e024=G>!A?W>|9`Bs~165v7`tXivJ&S$q zr#Sl(m(JR!{ouV1cLnt%<`uu_DnIc9=ijW~4ETzQU;NNVxe?IGU&FQbLy#S8CsMB1 z(Rk*3J$dvks4weB_$A)iPUKq0G23~f=KPTcl8-_JfWG`b+fUPyEDqCypS8{fY1f@i8uRy^CM@oL2e+)A$IA2gbS9SNNXaz#HKx72HhbRD;TobBrJ*N{&B$OoO> z)(+}JWWPc?qvHPB_)UUOZyX9A(}}r2zWMQ>L4Sjv`cV$+wFrMFi9!JV&x<Z-d8&A&@Fd z(w)VwaQ4?8&tzAu`o@F8B6_!O`j6^wdE*)L{Y+4QNKny%SNCa^0U3L)-AB@L?>{_y%^+oxtSLrnPlQ<+F^^ASo*`EXoua3jqEPV;( z6NO*e0ml*2IX_j!`|W^ytiKxMH)qR?&uk=q+)@_YV)@ zXZj@#KCQp-^ZmmM87D+v<|ndVrF_rNOGu~RgucmsMHui4>Q@HPdu;41JPmOJI{lyc zg!2dW5YZB6HO$BLcqQ~+0NwW^p3kHl`kmKA$d5Ep?&jvPeeg}<*%J`tpAq%Rth8SsnV!pC}||H|MiDn8#I#!nNuEMElT=gnKTGUNC1O2E92y`7r?LUL*mNT zM-TZIy6-duzxZGL!12%SJH@UJ^uzK7`-cNvy2z1wq`!$1`%OJEo&GAKoC=V7+4qo> zzZsyHw2Sn0?tZS*XTDw{pLY6A^zs;e`$N`|G4Lz({r)cURM$W1eNx>ou)P(8W)D4;THx^&YQ@ z!teb(x87?!=I%4veJ$?4nsr>H@EKQMHK54#^o`KJxZZN8(xo1l&Uon|eLTZAzrPW^ zW2NuK4^o#QSbI-ynYnd^!&O`N^|_ z=E2kPgnGrB&c3qRXA=KXFY<9eDg}P2Gtnz!%AsC)@L9e19-G;H$@%*$?ALXEFD~cy z)4KuXi2gQyTi_d6{V^VLKb`wa@oVSXh3D553GnNFQ2fB}xlmu0&ugOi&HH<9pFFI8 z5Pq4bRH08BD0H#Y#`h5EVfQInKPAe!PRI9ryHBcgDN}yhzm&)L&ME$&c}^MW+8-j% zwinLR8%mz|ncsQfIKuL~0dl1s#P@Oiysj@VhojyJ+5?S=6{J7b@p zk8ANi{Ybts5=UbOiAI68SN2y=7e@&NhTz`i(NH31-EmfY>_u%zz zp4U-yk*B{aD)OigF>=GyK2Oe8)GMaw5-0q=CGAZieIm!JFYzzqIji!E9?UQGD%Xq; zxfZ<`&%`S7*OeTxlX2ZtbdmRT5rm(}qh7?J;@5VL6+Ot#_!olP1Iwd7dXSR>zo;VZ zhISG;56LS&@f+i^qUb?>DWROE;`7Rx>;tmCsaI!~ZxRnoA0l3chL3SL;lp|{)|$qP zv`^M6`O-+I-{}YPv3=H2Zed2=be>9iW$;yJ`4%xw^Ju3z@U>?7CgTSCuLSt}iciLk z4$j|jf0X4%Zk(@wy+O92 zt54=;=g&M)mwsir?00&GkM`0p704SKKH5vZBKQ)w&ia}5QokJdvWAa(QC=E+CB-Lk z+c5D){yO+nwfOOw4!plLU9U6$2>I>)qWvBk`J-)Trzvm6fag|c_C4pzDH4hn(irks*dtz{WZT&*#e(*qWnoeMSF>T>OaFbA3qh!yJNO}Qx5%J1Yc6| zN&M7|Kggd0pDJGb6s24pKVJQ9$$m#{lKNwRMg9)t>HP)aV?NHin&9gxJ$2lXkL#1M z;`93<>}zpfh2&{&5SCPzbD_6MvmonuX`h?xDxU}+l zVUY9&=w+NY{PMv&U9^1Vl&Z&HvM{(W5_CpzhBFFpZ|A-ZpKd2ne1Gqkx%;Ja1`B#-+;z#cjh+nv_ zqhE&P|H@SFAiX#bL3vv-e_G}9D58GdBx}XX|i5tIn=*2%eRPrZlIoG zkXKiHUOjKk{Gwlw9-Jqd{gkaZPZ}$EUcb4*?r$VI&JV0tDM#XoeAJWsvT5)OpRUJ( zq6g_oJHqsAsQjWQ`H9^?J?H1Og8)9!ll2a=^~(N~dSz$%Ci_B6 zAHx5oS-wTApFHZn1HSq!-(*~1J#fFhqxi%=o@*Q`dQd$i7;kq?{UG**t+SJgPsR)O zN4#%By>j5waU|t){zkOVW$+v<*OT@fEb|c=@9bB&Zest*eRIU;a(-8HsO*sVqCD0U z&%J8>r5&)}qn*jGJHKUsQjYj#fN`vea>!oP5dzX zTvMcj@3pidff%8h)}*{kbG^lzAR z{?v=*Fn=ET?K;zbPnrCskn;Gwq0PhRzw2!!*qW_yK2a9+j%5pUD^yTZ+U)!`yr8gon1Cg?f18-UmX0}KIy;u*KGQ{ zRSEg5T{-g{6w9dulq2o0j^{(!-%a8K{XFBGNIi+dFY|#Bz2L2;7!mh;c-I55Ay zPJ>T6L;iy5w~ulQ#VSOi{uwOcn++Na)mB-P#?xmAL--IOxvwD z&MfDAh4C?>9A$v;aeO0R{5wvLV)M$K-w)1&@NwLtydwBSfBwV{>Q8&P&s$Uc!bdyE zUx6KM!^e3v%jJIX!0=H&%Hw&k=y$dMrsFF0<9V=@;iLb^$Max$!$-YXF3)*Y6rZ$@ z)Dzu)3FDXiP4MY@k^ZQ4fyNG4Shhym(xZH|O8!bnd6mHPw$phj^Y=r_%b5J+9|f1U-0s7N*_Zvk^P?R{?0Hp|R{+29=W?qb z%VRt-e;fH1I3<`brw$Zd_Zw`NksrAHT;EB4@ekL99q32?IQX@`QeI(!^P3X# z+c+ug65PJ40p*Duj0gIk>o7e|iyZ^_f%m=1KM0U3e&>5>iCm9!{X@TVJudzV%E$E& z*V|kNaUCxC#Bco0cj-P?4?+*BrzX;MJqe%f-?`4|D0zOoU{s7x!>un*Bw$`4f8s?50VGJE>EvZ*}laO{E2_L|3qYaXhELvia!Tn(cmn#g#eK77x_>^yUR|Bi7>Ig($;IrXSQj|Ncq#NQ>H6DWdC z{%(NY!r%K3>PN=Y{AT9&xgR~# zkU#79X}>XvvmZOX>3_*D^E%2W#=$px|9(2|(%)^An*qPb6a6E`F7g*CR~YdVKV;0l zjwA)eLkIcw^T2+2%zu@$kLC3P%9HvX_cp!%l=?|<{SHFL(G2)ay)2KJ`3~)(pII+; z7k>PuXE*8PE}(_DWN(mzl33ln{3KlNq5%kr~G4?AB@|3|@BF!Fex zkbKrvhAq+ZBJWW7i^UcM;D{kAG!^yK=5{_7)M?<0EcdhWi-NXd~h zre2P3-aot#lmWl+iM>4MS5$Pdm*W|+0exzU&$BP|{zFso`RyL_9a|4Q@M-;}pW*kh zXX9gP7u#j>r_O#pei5+!<@u3zPSg`}vep{Fy8FDIdM+ zlGdmG_)(_UK(F8H%D?Qyqwn6B{q|jwE`DwyopQoZ_$A(Y;OBZn=w6=r_J#KXBHyHa z#eY6qKkV<=zS2k!>+cu`5%A?^k#?~> zbKib$za{nyXZP&+!0CRAwJQmJDM$Jj_D|F+hji*iy9ThQtnzz2bNxXVd=14X{Xyva zFBG5nDT8@`6n^}2AJ*dn{gL~n^Bczz+R6LM1*8i-$j&s6Z(5ALMMmJRe`|k9B#verQhzdi8-)4}N@@@q+ak`IWO<%awH++Y$F4MGk)+@7(&C z>ooSadC0ZvXO4fw$v*IG|1{axXhDvYE%w^}sgHEsKZ(69ylx-637d`Fsrt}Nzi{+1y&%U>X z?-z^y#_1>d#b3i`y7@EhU_8-GqVS6zk)3DvGfC&VT#qYa58q3tpVt$=QD0&cdd>FB z^Uuk3z&9CiJq1J_S2llN)*hL8ON`FNiu@;j$D<*`1<$8%Om z!$dPe`?^tAQG{-Lvge$LAq zIxpgT+PDt2^CFf@yOTECvV9L)*t^{4X%Ye#oR-u$|AgmmgfJGefJKQi@$ z*unWJv5fo~#V6w{*Jq4V`Yo^c{C1yl{Zb9}Lpv+rGkUE^n1038&-}WjkNmd%+xE;j z9|e@B$6@NvacMH&^%U^>gUNn-_R*=oBtPSm`FWpCuM@rX<)W&}7v$#>(p!p8{2X>J zx1;#P&wO9My$?79pYii@dk!GX&zV0tdu{*UFy{zZuX*sB@+Qw?@V=y!C+jV?WBO0% z{E43^huDRD;gNnihxwbHcT2sn-YGZwXJ?0=UrW7mKOlj0$eo-Q*Zqm;!*)T;B40t} zmwIFSu=bS|UywXL|H1b`&`!PwqHFTgFGT%Zh-csAIe_SB8n@c+q@oAuGdZt+!%Y6= z$+d2ODzEZ;aUOZ5D2!i_Jif1?uJTDePTv2Z=pt_?3iD9p(N5w}@oRg>iZ1IJKF`2- zi2udeLpf56#0|?MUk`Fp;3psLWPd#AHw+)kW&5Z=Ud8ZH4$I~9Urocu_dt-J{Y_8t zN&RwPYOLtuKgKOF1AP*Ioz}08Up`kvz0$LMljn|@K4N_~<9{(XXvp zzRB|wL-Yp?l-r->o4aqqd41$>GxkpUahA{ZX;SftU-_IxPSJz>+JatX#V39Z>(6V7 zPx^EAYqmdcgHOk8Q2BOWO5#@9SquH8zF#PD&vA_XX8M1efAlyedUf!9xfs&PpTo7* zOUmPW88)}hY$CtC@1MZ_9oOfqpH4`5_PiPGE|~pH(pw>PyZ)VCraT)I{zZD?Y(|<)8&mC=UpFcWw`rG-k zeQz=Sm;k@FL;T48L;F$N$NXjF*YjxMqy4mt-*c#epMGdRX?CBLa@!$#^$kDkk>xRe zY@_po-9M?lFnIqY34ZN|Aba_KiG`lmtUxa9wdV_|Z!@5LsR#R90qtd+F@NMSXYWGy z731KiUMX|FiTzXteA+J(j~&GC=HjuA{5BpdCO_?Hg_Jio`#to7t@r3Zg5%%z|12*7 zer=z$&;H#mPDl?!(ZlmcqzpOMAGV(OUTwaI+uFhQ(xg0~@QGgb{4VVn2G}9-Q!(o| zTORXg{^|T?*M9|*pK*}~Km8(d<^HPP50UHfM)!VPNf-S~(OJLJKa@ihe(`G$#plO`>3`_IBKVB{lke+=^`ng64)WV^qGIMn zw4)zVUK;HrtUT6V>T%~UyWgKj{>Y^+o%~twTl>l(?UMD%{0-!{=liIy-G6L{lvltx zz0KJd`**N?738<}CBbj)i(}l~TzM7bxAR(#+Z^ZVk9tUX5pxdF#wX)#g#31VOFcVy ze2Ye2?0?@?+voi~w@%F8=={d>`BJ{ew~^<_iHzHoC!Z`V{!h*aRZex~S5e-5cOHN4 zJ9hZ%Bf=0=9`BD6g-`me7V`IiLYH>Rc_aNeM!IhI(r@rwUTl%GoB27fXMV2#?Dsc# z&Ml|%2kD9>sDoeRi60{7eNFU3Cq%Cf_`}w>^hbP&^8?S9SpCVz z^+yW))N6op_`W9gzj^Rke+{1M{H6N~uihr#jiKK}zSJkz|Fh>n=lAz{{!^DH?Sb)3 zI|k5etn85W3(F;6V(GM9h%WMz`}}NQss9X~ zkLI~2mfzV-`K%8<-^}kl!k)QvvhiiXc2iH5n*pD-n|!pJ_oItSuGqtKB6ggq1<3W{ zU`1nr_d|xrZ|BqYJ|_JgS?=uBc6fi!-N)ne9z5R^b{~)ZKauzG=r@Z}51xIK^O!a0 z5Z|;0&K2YBLeZ@)u zpXZ0k{iUWVN9u$7v_$Gp6n(^xYt@3&6g)MnsMC6EF+)t)meejP|zM%MsY!TefDTjVd2J%hs z*V3v4{F^&>xE5^IPcrBf90(FVaud zuuq&vd!m2R;L~<^`YmTay}5C>hWra1cbi790>%S7?)C!ol67Y4hE2b>A-R>a+xDCG z+!pIQ4Ss9CeNKpR%5j1DYskOQ`A`%5B2Vh2W7YwzmtKfomfz~d{K>7I9~SyOkPP^# zSHtK85c!pFFyeVoUR zjh%^*_u?eBasJSDYPr;t=bRS0?^%Xi#!WipTv8*Te5rpv_o&bB3!USQe$TkXnO;AN z{v2NzXUQj`{nuvWjQwpI>7uX18U0BdL(dra3X0z=FSNfcD?Vx0e2$j)`&hqC@acLG zJ@|fZBJcNQKH}`K^Rx=+e4nM*)T=^E5l3X(OMV&oF*zcQ2rPnSWS4#{qo0-6Xc1`a|?&etm94=3)A~BH~}3 zN1%TTkW*IjL?6Z%^{%RPSF5gG?RkS%Am8+Tr>tMrYhUq8xz=Bi?VO#qURf{HFB!lm z{$jt7L%QfL?UDJ24fs0?eaebo_Y3q3{Z~_b(k~?TcKZeq#4Y(c!TL@14fH;P)RP?# z;@dkv*nQ=aIS?f#yewJ_Ud>`$r7(Uh?<86%kZ_e<| zKbO=)y7dF~A&!+CsT28m^*s0dO5!QO^~`>R^~L81vf!sYwr7@GQt5u7e!0{6F53ss zCDj$bw0}Oo%;%3Ow-cbJ#C-$zPdD5CAciP`vOv&YXvc zT#0k~h4OgcU(Z{m{N`fU-&Ii_{oM*E-*4w;f0*UbPxNo}sm@-z@7+0Jb|0Jk3GiEc zIo~2~ZhtIj-X(rxej?we!}%(oN98(+`)PcSoY*P$^ZO?q=qnCZ33iTR<=*91v&%U2^ zx-Otz>8CqCEcCsrIq=h8W8D9=?_Di}Py5SncetNu-)oTikeknIeu*EB2Sm=#ZTv7^ z7)PR?S3i^Y3`U;e>}37WfAm8J>1I5ddw*aad|FTGU)k>29xEYy>|e>(RCc?@SWcXNbObK&L7lU_{6@7 z$xr?w_^o{jvtJfgUI+Q@xHVoLT;KhG@;d-#p!Kk@BKD%-Tc#Cit~}-rsZgsW@ITJ}inpUOi9lH$`?1Zr?07jdb2$b@t3Z z$DUJighzfs{azV-+73N0V!6DZ&`@$cy(jx#-C6p?9=o5wevNXY&vN$abGagy`(_EG zi~ibAn|q%~0r@z;fc6poe!pn;>&c%3pY=~^f$vpqBERkDqc5NB z7imW)pgd_$w1b%YDCUn!u^@Z-d~tl&X*&>m?Q;{fHv>K;)~|<%+0S7;P#@}FM}BLs zJy%5jR!DjFe6o}$@lZ17mZ^u0hs16Ri-#!q(&YC9`t9G8L;n=OXZ_Q`xlO%a=JyN7 z@9m$%6Fo)l2

fpYuvy6NTUVd#-=uc*ykt*O$UC{p0}p#gfzdmbkF<+zisqI5dGI~E^^Agt{Tez>;#(CNf?mvw_;L;11IZS@g;SiX| zdT{h%M=xFOFoyd(#k#w0K>z5++;tgPxXNAEfZ0#D>vqFo>QfFI!1UGbx(7^u+Fdt+ z!_T_wO4DKHT8E?S942vYG=}+J6Bxb4rFU+1m})z00Moa*>mD$DySpx<-_Cv+*LOLr zecfT@Ziho)@|*6u4ouzSuDifO*IoC3nS0%J6WIEeyB+{@-v`>8?k>0^Xlh119m_sQ9lPUl#9^DFb78-%178!23pGc;7|^*aF7!UWydn2T%Yu z@qB(9&#TA&xO>aOp9e z@2>!BJm-&d=Oy3(n8SJN4lsrDx`Rcof5OE0r&B{z%1@VcY!_JHy+|XQ6Bs0UEmP=$9e3l_JLXK@0GBB7R7#51K0z`u#T<( zTfhX?pEY0v>$eoJ0PF#)n7@vIdCa@Iz%u4JLtqi}fIhH_aUy~KxD1p&SH`&vo@Z<- zy4NpS3kdc>Jt}Tw(V5JQ-d$RrC6N~Trd9rfg59C7f_mMto zyLsWWzP56|Z+&XXu1p^zJ@X=`ckQTh<9P=iehSm$DQ5@mxpvu0k6pUM7bo__h0*&F zd4G5Px;1C7S$Wzq>(`yNYW-R3Rv&uCo7TRf?A`$C`w4RMz%8D()la^B_G>@qWG#-Q zw{`l`F4Buz2Ga+4ud(G%E(_+*ndgTnKZ1P{D<_5bZ64EXFWf3#NS`MEc(2*`#0@hy7xi|UCLp5Ao9Dhr>%O$ zx|L_HK3VwqlXAQ~{;!F0KKI}s?z-#6hx^k*FMVkrbn@MOdA-Q|q6gz_3_eK{J$Rpm z$ob}Js}4BhTnNzRr}lC7{`$s?BBgh9-YG0nejap|-~7^PHz2#DFH4=`;-L(_$KSQ> zbIF_X&Lh;Xbm`Qu4!-Q$KeUc>Ps$Vi$CUd#sYP zJk&+<`0D_)oA?Wzy`-~UQcu!bSeKN3^P^EM?u>pdP+THE}rFo(or9~l6>OV(nT(vauP3c_Fw;rCk}$@Ap!mo z{FDKI;p~-LE~Fkx;J<0_w|+RN9!luf8sMY9*{^9oiT>6fjJM}!PrI0QiVXP$@kjP` z_Wt8r|GdH4D{;>6H&fP5A8tI&Npt=!AV2kb{LyRABCq6c-|qZN+QaMG{um`Pq<$L6 zA4$1=s?*oL@ZIDM(zgTtZ2h9S`Vo1N3uf#4AD^v0pyk!y;>sC7PHaDC|Bc6<{+6Kn zD}$f*rNF<}%lEri>QDbf-@M^3fd3oC*LGS_{iS^fAx`__7Cb$I^a*g$>ke>e~WwXJ1fYqeBM6xU(QbP zpC5mS&wAO(*?IJ;-)cW~(=I;q$j9=w-*dNXg5s|X{yMOXd@HuwxR3Rd)OQK<@}|;D z=<#iwKGci#&G|a(jdae}EuHgqO_%!bu5)&AT;ROy)_uRab&y@QKghkz`SI{;9=%@d zqR%G!;62k7@CjY_2b_Pj4~_kU<@s^>F=sdRrCwq4MLWM7qP(#AV$#e<Q8(*FfOg1%HaRgm6v}dC@%ROq$c>JY|ob)xDF-OFu#v;{)~B9 z0aymsfK6Zr*a!A7-x>lN=*NcaZ_tk7zzpKD4;%rb@J9le2DX5GWse`{(0`=po}C*x zRuQ>A^VVbQRvx+b1N@Hdyz2&op}VskL)9f>|+mFyKXgk zwfw{Z&QD)#-g4=Kho1Wn;Su>+(3wYYQ}Pd9xqc;iwfqX?{CVGx{ASC;9zIZbB)tiG z9_{LcLpH8|?L`-)nBGM??f=oMhkv|kzk{xnbl?6E{Wymt(hmo&Jaf$|$?W~4e9BK8 z=X(#D30^h>Ta(qaUxxFyjZv+v$U^Is3L-_x`@HNI9*L zau^>(&UKGnxoZ8IRc?1p%O66{AL>8f_lDztx+mqw4s!NEB_G5N?t2h9cRgm!>7^r9 zpMLsEwSlM0$wJ;9FMIiuuKWGnuVp#qkaDOuk@cd>(Dl)RoZr4?>m@5cas9oN-w%*4 z`6_ugelgC@`Bi7pzdyappCq5y$@WI1KMy{3-Rjjxt}F>3emC^mKRb+GCFvrMekW4T16Q85@{Cn$&NxLF z@e_G1$ms!pcI_Xp|Ke|V9t(@aQ{)x%_3g*mBG;c#mY|f+`X^G4qe`pS`5lvq1D2md zIZJM+uD$(9_k397Nja5(@}(TsKap|Z;#qP>BDy}?kaOfGpHY1D?4u8nbdf{<5LurG z9)IxaRclV3^l_9opgym3ereQC*zk=nZWvJ>?Ilv~tJbbNedTFu&eH-#zZB%;fNRS8 zeDa>J9_|m%q96MkBKzOmy0w#7^X;TQz|Y=v;kkz#8+}al5DN_G{mXNN$B+MzeDqiP zHrEdK+VQ*HH|)2=4b0aL$S3te{}35hN3A<~^*Sh~^%_CWv(_D!IeweB940K19zWFC z$^P}k*S%-a%5zWn1Ite%9U^`3%HMD>2*fDH-6AlGai<9E0aNI&iFI6$feEzBG|;9u zKp&zVWKiGCXZgeAP_HKPQ=ZLFdKCT(OD~3`H$Z1OHov`Qd6sUk$v1}IY`XPRKSV#u zVg5Yo+xnA!4oeTygYsQGEsoSNKP{=al6Yo+O=LgtMz8tv-iyR5@4IvkcX9iHUw-C- z6*u0xtH|F}yEy5rGuHe!VpimMy#6nGgp>2=C7-(PTZiqppAfzD#VOF)PprQ>f5Dv} zS@$eS_s*3?a!BWTE{gqdN#{??Vf*Y19!=iyt;g;Y9!bw$=-NHYIq)kRN`Jod(&HrE z>o*p$oFzv;tu6-2&&xNtuhNGe{q3&Xf<}pcbUq__f`v$0N=;_62{uo&C(i-|=gf z6UBZD^>|>%*MH(I4?XfRN%!qJ3ibel?D48)?tFR-dNqMD<_EI;6yni0%p>0P(c7-O z>$+p#Ch4Bsjchl>#ggFtPAWT;|2=-8Zw13A2pR=~An^3F9bBcEK$zDEV=O~se+>W}+A z4ajZJq)+=Np0E7WqtE^Hv4^$Rh+K&e+C#rR?fTE2vEt?r?e5Z-ENR`eX?sQ}FZOEZ z7uu7;wa5{B$S2ogPY&tjS-!WzMLG4cX*blJ32;)m5&e-0A_@v&v8u5R`F6-WbiYkI*>B&v_nxP691&gQCw^p{ z^L|k3*lBz@E@vnEtL;F1|KU%5-|4%2;2g@SBHyO!L;TEsj95UvrYcwb%JTT0h=cyU zUG$c>fAbeop7uM(+44gt?ElB}fBrg27r*Os(Bk(oZJ{NykF5*@!PS_|SQmed*9Q{q817_x61oC(moDqZYjyCTNm?>g)pD1P0qQZM#~$osuEqa#wEH6H^sm^%pZG6&n)4686Z4h#JnPQiHJ|FYi<$Pgk1L<;@!z|}jr&$=bwIcd-AD^Q!ZV~%OGD3*aF`1 z{Oh+`0y&P`>DPc=3GnrR$FBSP{Y#BMME=~m*E9eyX%g&Kh^eEQ0^CoAHS0?U-IJ$^S%PoTR`e0sP&@Gzm6Yx!Y*IA zcYCBy>Vf_Ie(yT#M(QKwaJ(Hue*Cr5_-9!`?W+X+ddQbn`DEPh?CS1AF?LhnD}ax5 zDZ^`Li>V*37f~;{mhw3c5Id05Q{{U7#F7S{0~ns=+QmSnOS?~F-cUe)KzpMnPVM&e zSw=o7U;3pa(sPPW`laYyXnzN~^Rn zop$5<_kQ@)k4m{xKb*g`!N+)!bpE_J;E)iB6 z)_491?mh?WyKD5|yoK|4*7sQPiGR3W;CkW@!*x&i-ig0@FZIkJ-g!-b@tWnxb&wr} z*E|20fEA$dOWfM_Qd8;TPtKb%pwo_y;*+=~pU9QC9UwjWhG~2YJx)1>UV~p!iY{?Z zKNpdnRp~)-QAS)86rb3^bA;5N<8DRqd3G#q&R$1)>e}zO(5?rddph_(qFhKnl)^a+ z(hFmEK8fpB(uLnEcQNM!a_yzf#bfp)=SSuv3cu7N=X<2*!7u4zKjVn=dg@bEd{U3( zlYCNNO{Di``62^#Eq;mPdJLo-7 zF3P!dk;nOb{%tSx`?*5F`RT&1K6=<<@KLJpPu3COs{r@8bf3GIWXS1I${(2XzE9ch zuSYKepU4|N=KA3lWTV3r z_#gQ7bIx3zAg4p&Pl3M${sQ=iFTUZ56>&edCYgNwaZa22s5S7v_48M@qu!>lu1BrU zh~qHI+wkJoUbdKn2}+Q-U^}B;Bgmg9;r-#aE9?`{Udp$893PX`kBU+DZ&~h3)0h5} zMo4|u-{}0!^PKPg=$6}Y5EJ_tPaHQ|;D2z>``2>*!lHzK5>J@-_rSl$v5)_j^D6R- zog7ygH<49NAMyx#KA(H9P6_@_Kz3_OgxOf?@aoB<1^Wf9`fsOq5tvfx zqA$nqIP@DqpSQkAuAbJvKi|W(-p3Pq8S-+5zYDvIitgDNsi09i~l*VxACp_wWNI7NaVOnWE>DhzSMtxS7%r63$FfqN?*TyVgAo} zjsL^V2coB#`p31N@B8C0qtdiOWc*= zw;Jd=F2ol3N!)WEYl!o=9LLXEe))KDM!2Rw;m^Ot)pHke$-nc%@3?kJX38sn`QwBc zug1uC^yjbr+R_D#`^h!VKWAQY*j~#L^YS^qa@@~@|Lh%Jck1#5jQdsaFWtI%+lqj3 zpZ@8izh(b*_XBUp+Hq0*&Um4phLEo{mw4d*0daHVT>Q<`IPu51om@R|oNJ?;4ES_? z`|S|>?Y1ANsC_z_CyXC<{T}r`_@VbavP6w@q>DXb2jiJIM)_gmTK72D&qhz3+9Uee zajg$IDa9x4FNbS89<;z;R{Sy^)YP@qPX&BU(6ygfN8;c1bDV#fp6xlk*}h4aJW|dW z>2mG2WAyv_4G--y+j^5*?lSLvcR=h<1%i@>(x(|U7%XP-4^ z{b21)hkZx%5dTsR^`c*i)Qfs1&d`3D_isw2i=OOfBA`>xg5neZ==p|M)?B~S1V6|1 zi9VQj@mlPVdgt>%q_a9X||iO;`8)c#(B5Mm3AFp>+H_}Nv|MZ&d~d;A45-o zUNQ7K;&^ zIRD%au+3_{xNm9ovhA`DIpfXf)yDIy_rCk0$LIB$)&uWb+H%>Rxc{43=loFuiha@_ za9%0bUVU%i`4b}h17aKb+5fYjV1LD!vB>e?(z&jb@+JQHoF@6YN?(a<&I`DoJc<7^ zr|~cSM-kWhzP!+DkXJMOanPHFUO_!|3_S{Z-_UD_^O2z!L65GV>M8w7LS0M05(i%z zboxR3!=Lc6z6%j|o}+t>8xP4N=;fW8Ka^B?(myqKo$a40kXH{VU*et5b5bwrA?4|Q zhy4@xPll>oEr)H%%3(jkc}orJpwwAY{{`8{`HAQw@x=GFQ{S@6FZ#0I;Jk$8)D@qU zLp_OM@y~Mk{tcEpQ1YZ)_6zK<>exSwojtWr;x&b9y}lHB8}jmoKL>ir(4(MN6Mz~?b^ILX2j&x*n~JZ_ zF;l;Jb}i%hC;9yT0P<=;p?mQ$d5)FiY(u4sos2`S-x$x5pFdB>IXn9^a;9;{c&426 zaZ|lT&qUc>>wOQ=lkee(AUz8d9i)7Y5yUpiFDO3oAK(AM^4abxiqG@k(&p@Sq^GXM zFKNghfUfI_ev$gk<9(S-k3SN=Zj$!O_tcZ0^&&Dwf9lKrWqd#O>CT<{(bIo1>5@C^L_PnQC`U+q~>d&;+dTmQcN zE%jRmzrBAc>HNw5P73kH^Me=v{$Kz4{wuaUQFuho0CMboQ_2t&zjAygwyAGr>IYpO z&jThu_?o}>eqMTo$Ps_$z|V1k{?zrTFLk2)V0)857%QuFX1}+c5UbMd~OoyiJA1N-=8gtdB1;u@pZrW{!w54 zo%}6+&x7CY%S$?c;&&Ub<&biAL8kY<=;9l0Kj&AUmrLy=t>~gp6xUqeQ=h!zllmc_lqdC5LV8{C34H+j znu;#%i|2kDNbjh0(Vz1iVj1zA27h1ii{5;mg8Fh^F;;w@-b<73och7Lj^xy})O!>C zVF7g3uh_|-?BDP?u5#4f$9Vm}zwsRED&s--klFP|9r8Hu)N;MQ!=Lwg6HAqTczPai z2zmcH;I=EicFgEH;gWV4yU^K3UG5&=_u9&zcHUFc#Xin+^9NzS9{Nibb9O%?j^yg3Fx$~0Qc;>!P zP&`W9NM_h``c0x)t=|W%Aq&+w~!>xBP~_kvNZ= zeajr=g~d7hTi&<$=gwQ*{hs5l{)Ch#an62*amaEdoj>7Yeg3ECcRJ8-sQjVhp5^hJ z(MiWO_T=1~<$J!GYiHb77aoZVekYxNExu3t-|J5i7d9TNicjR!&3l)v9IlHPUySRX zk|X-k1|rW75xM`*^#$#)=ZNAL&Dz2B7ViV_K1NRQ`RyOq_8i#=de#kp6ZDp%%ecjJ z-3`=V418%|SMlrdo%e-~uI=&F@_%jZzq3{MhkQ=2c;tuvdGx1$>c9F};*9IW)Wyzj z#s_0TFen~!;CFtU_V2t;baVNW>ldH*zOkfB{MC(o-go-r$9CA4?M-;)CweC^?(%uR z6MyjQ%sKzP-ha$j+I#kKw=X9A(hqSxIHX>9zijl9X?<$B)bp&-{(HP`zh^#2(ODM$3=`ZDu==QoazdLE?ZaJ}0+c>lk=Zq+T{ z6**Gh?VGU=hWTWCgPRv${L*hcF`&LD=PjBjcb~s~?jRUDPut1$__5!5`ER!Q*L`1-awJ|TN3KOL+D4>aUYh@_&B&kM zmu;wY(Ua@r66n;kr}(sDVoeFXpJ3_S~a(a;NspUNzKQ4I9Dp%2iHw+x;0^sb_NdPfH8TKer0#)mQJ^sDI4 zpUhuUc&|Fsc^^Ay{vvX@4&ywW?VmCQJy~<}gTiIg_NC_=%uhV#+SdKlg))QIYgNc= z0`)vu>YMW@&WmZ6KA+;n&Ey;j*B#6!Ws4lnvp7%TenIMkQ+u==t}Cn@&UZLZ;kl4< zh#ZdBRu1PooNw?PM<+xM$1y91^Onr(5#Km>5dDz0YdX$yesIm{?~Q(C@jG5A{*iiS zdndBJ6WQ)LKV-Y-e2aB$k@GN1uRvcZKd9Z8l>SnG?8kDTGY&?IPuh9x!_IE|d|VQI zX{1ZJ!asn&bB10Ay=dq;&?|->1-(8?U(`ojw-jC4c~@OadrX0E06P68dh#dj+@9y6 zAA;JsCu442!}hDs{mZz*bvxHH&;8O-4=vmM$Nr_X^U~$cuWa93R~)+NC0B6#rk+wR z^(Wf*Aqm>JJ->o zr(eE#KB1)K2K75!S2Pu$#95r?U4SJ{S)`YvhY_8m{9yu?_9^S z-QV)FpS=EuAN|=$t{$fMt2obN{YyH3;y>0iv8u|^^F-$7yg2AQnzWDVqUm>L#ERV8JQg0Pp+x{j7dQ zk={~#LXYCQqv+xn`+Q4Zr3cy5hy5ePC;H}au8Vq3#@Q>Uc6<6RO{;5ZH(a+B5w|U1 z4_HwAQV!Q+T<0;a?fQxBi|eqb+^|dWPl*rv?-Tay3g7?tSMK6X>1WjbKlJ!?Y0LNi z`IM`DIet6-n6r=Tv`ZfOuMb~y%hvvT-(-B@x*!EU>g!5y|BIi!fBuh{1HTY;IY&CS z$iuH({i)=(OZ;=`($4EfKFbN34@%rnFA*p8z;#v^c9tQp4ICG z=}pBa+_{&3 z?qYu*)APq7whKuXJvmMgIX@(Fp2&4w4eO}Q%@cW_lJ*j-Gy2Z259=yj?B@N=BIukS z#Xm8%TjGvF2jk zlb>?7zwz52vAT*pwpn7~_0C?Rlq>Pyia0uDj8(aQyF0?A$B%Q!auc8YKb(CDoU_x} ze&$_>))HF?Rm=ElNsAhL)E2d+?OPo!I$cy+TCt~;&WBc7RJ4{s zm(&`ijMkE(M3sh8|L1znbv+d{9 z$bXXQsNsWt!=6`#9nwqbgrSH2t-E^H5gR5S`fJ{*`EPtnw{JUT=paXaQaWg!s^49a zKEszset~+d5^Aj`a^}T1E=jn2!zp}V~YccQpP1{cV za+Wjbbbi>^$EVYKk8h_>r}~=hoSW7|l-6iZlWCW!?mI|b8N~(qjZDtPsm`~RNS`B} zt*0QaXPg(4p3pyx>%CZCpK+ERQ- zZ>az1rzhH<>{qJw4%i#mF;DL;HIKj6Gt|Dtf6~yw4^xEw_lvUdS4Z~4KRVZ4V1CNv zLtph1N|U6^7&_FG&UH&K#pQ^h3)=C#axWaK85s33#(Jz1FF(OQdJt#+Ic=S{?l(T! zd8p$0_VGJk-gEc(&ERRw(!VzHs(l@4Z<;KKhq2 zkH6&fo9|+NtA0T5=c6oNV`}dMLOsauiWBj-?-{T|^G2nbk7?aSpZgItXtihs#%8#=^c{5of^KQ9?4U7Go@7xcr# z=L{ZkSTHc^zr}hf5ikFNj~={N#`qns?swUJ&JE*QOGLewSMRO&3G(aLzuEpv=k3H- zGLgdH(no3Rr%}D5efZ_of4utOeh*7O@kIZm{zm=NF!|+}_MWGkdCuki>RB^-qMz0J zv*P^W&!--)FL`Yiy1|Z)^x*wDTHpE8=r+&$cAy^f8}yzVP#kIhN9$mz@`pK8BK zwSK6559ovT;;);P44<&QaGs-mBI#Q-bcn+SVLQ(OK2Lnx(4&4dztOpors_p>H$?V8 z56wTcZmRmX;|J{V@BL9+!d~#vd`0V_x)-Qu?MC-6)XC@D zH+(*5OzsKlagOl7pneqRO5;C^?CsZ&B~3o;&^oEsQ`?lAF?5il{!6LkNUpz*>aWL? z4L``ObKKB6s^m@>y7wcuaDK17zTB?i2f5k(9KF^lC3kot;sZb1b_+eUzN55Add(}e z&Qs?5x%&6n&H-pWM}Aal=gp``{~SQs=nK21*IzGicBns%{cn$5^F@dFLAy#ZKWFHG z&yoL#hi}rKMGrqh{FsLyXFOFse2(~fFMcRVeAC01*sj|KkA5w7V`Lx3i6+O9B=Pbm z?A2q(6a7xJ`T@}(4a&}FUwI=Bi(4*NYU?8%{UOnbdr2>h7Nk=xvwC7bbeyg&;@$U z8}EfY-Af&~=eu)A z=cpaMz9XvhKF<{C4_f`N`MCvAx)lAmzB|+XpLx2%N6bwe9pxL7}W@1CzImdh{v*Yk^~XY$wj$rSJFO#IyW=j(qw z;lX%nCcV~gbkA3o^fzWd|J^0t$30&~(!cP|gLizuTPK1)RbQn&ogTX9Yta3dsxQ$u z$$#{OxkLW_m$tq{ANz%qlmEq8XU_A24D_n6&K`~~P5LcP-?}p2qYwKT>aBV!kluO{ z?MY*|QoRT1yGs9l&2hsA{Y!iY7x!9ks?zQ{>8xsKm)h^v`;XeEJr9rer293c_w|q8 z^T=X+sSn!i9N}RP>`;H8w0Mj2lRppi@6#-k4t$`W=4sot~%<>c`0#rDfCf0)p~B7^hf@5^_$+$`fQu@ofU7H({FuN@5{a%s|n&; zUW=?*7-a1bDi{7F5*#hXQf)l z&5^#yv~9|xJx%cU*43Vp%uoEv>1E>t@v8SEzddF4jp7Y{sPnsE>HF*V#tyOf_z4d? z`n9J9<@@UaYEM=2Z;}ptYYC;4CPphP`D2fHhT2i;rLF!ZpmW#G_0m1k=8gbY04 zd~}sw`#MXy{;HpS;46D3mvMCCoYy&y?*Bm6jCt_L?NR-s-}1|AKK+F?*Vsd2hIsb# zTfcEC@Y_7;=bvL!|D<@6ysps;eoy?Gac<_Fz&A;kVLo)jdV=~Nt@o5kS7n+v^sqzy zgVu$mhh0y=cxwF$f9gG2X+wG*M}65op%>bp|NUgs(?jFF)^k+vu{)xAg54>?{`yLV z{BphYL!-nO3?A`WGBDz3nEn|jzF&L>{p7syC*61OExsph_P6JC6ezHB&iv$Yz4QD{ zznlH_5a+Xqv+O-?o;*o8ZKnU~zHt4V6ucEZ{pdAbUvvBMm-ZXqYxg?-nTGS5=)YZm z_vwD)d-rZfA1D1N)16LT_?dp=`zYx%hq-bU(x0*GQ*SM5e6OG;;V)pdZ&(X@h`pWCLi^#F+*vR`AtIy`;ux$oNp+uJBBXkujVE1iu{89 zD{ElHW14==6QBNabYF+!Ht3(G*X7S7a{fUJ7VLNZ2af@W_A=t;#FzO=#O~Mr+R;ns;2zAo!u%2eyA_qqiE0hpk8!-PxX>#d6a|w z`aLI|i@)H->mU908|NI3eAuJ-A7i-${eXNu;G^Gb(mwK%XKb_50SgLYPjCB&Cix8V zi+rlIM*5D?JFxvN^&d(#?jCYfQEI_Hy}HD*_c*^Du+uV`pT7CuB4ol)PDr1$0gfCZm_ z?vlS=v)vZA0Yn@o?sa;IztVpD@crcZ?;(DC704g*&<@qV`THtmLx;Gl61M#t;?Dnl zfk{&i`Tn}4-PeTvs(+H0EskSG31?LJfxZ*w*NCGU^y=@)MqlMnfIzTaz~sNeeuE@Rds`st;8CY?i8J)}P4=10^1dm!=?{GjvbIV4ACL7w<4)wyceW$QihyGTCzpEmiVJ$#AyoQIDS zU-0l#te299FA_g)@Q63R|EigM*rWJSnkS!zp$q-v^(^f9yP7m$UO95L zD-Zs#NBxh^J?NZ8&FG7AEw7x$2aTsHH)YC!zxrj3Bl_J3`}-5{zveqib&f;hfZso> zK6S4{_K()TQU9#*Kyr(QZc%czzis<#^bfw=y5R?V)h}yYkleOMH{G9}@ATF=soBnF z=^U8qUHvBNv!8w=&0fE#f7U$`k~?PT;1{jKD%E{Bfk-!p7^4Nj}t%U;m27oRS%yezV6{W)U)Z~>%_MW9{rB) z)vfMDyB>_}!+c%$PU;?udlvgj`=s0Ehu5p1pU`-dVYxxS`>y>*-7~RNcHK8O8$0Gi z)Cc(J9*Hvfl=h7D01Y10yZU#fBc!hyz0n_JuI=qd^!<{)<57RmG38)yD(~d3?L@|I zS>lG1&dpzbFhKCFdwliX&+tRkm-oly1PA3T-v#7*=RP~%w)bg|g~!tnZ@LGu%yMd% zwjTnYH2cl<$mie(k~b}N&!?{hXyvTS{M{?5%cj=9^HqR>{zKANu;c=Uf7QP!RX-Ph z*x8q43i^KSdD!H`u1VU{_Usxlbk?p7z&Lo0TIGgZ;ztjJ>jKs;+5Mr({hwOzqBg&--S)}$e-D7c1%9(s1j~4RsEzMiQ?4Su@Mvrp07Nz&DiJu=h6f4x3xod zu66I{uY3HOIqM)Faz@E-jH&uR+wWRA8>3+GEW7Z~-7da=@sN*|BRzIoEVJ8>R#-7? zxA2$bplm;X`Tcm}QETT+f2B-5>}XQ|j%P>S&{;b+fg-`P`{Qr^`Rr`-_xRh|Av@pt z+(nt++!JSuDQY&cl!4Y;j&OrZ?W3- zz2iui{F9GUANKbd!Q`ucdJD>3crP4z5ct?cmC%$K7hZiU9$U(bI%=J@zRgHjeOXp_z*0) zfEQ)g=o8N0C8nV7XV;j?hh4*jb4+Dd-OyRPwgcnf`PK#Z4E^c;kMD}VtzEKv-<{XJ z>X}zAI}Z6_eVKLzJ2d}Ns(v;5WYkWfzyEzo-sD677~vFCjdvwOXZ7D63I)$j`5hNN z`_&(X(-f<}>|6Kr$wPMg+z-A8TIer736@;Iut(#AQrQ#xi?b)737>=q0|`6*aUw-J zlou7?_I}8Z|(e{b!S@+^_}*s9eh&1H zb>DLL8>*b_Ome)_`eel`SADy;oc4{hKdN#~Qx5f@_*Pmth;|<1QmwzrUZv0vb{FHl zeu_^;_P}oKgKEE2e#{v<#MdZc|2w}a>O1by*NCrq_#*KQgNI*R21XpDNY^3W+6CM2 zAP&-N_u8lTMAfe?2RVsN+Sm>ig;v@wPn#WoFbvf^-$b2ma9a)zV`+9t>R&U-PDV;aL3H zs6JuW2>p;GUV1}cJ*fBLeS7OYvtaWNpOufrsg^2|>WZ|$*u@b8^l)b}fpll^ONf1x<``};AY z5A?1O_T$*!7ipMs{rs-)QCfyB?6(GdkJ2@Ch@aH+k)L2s&cI>(kbZ>tetrwu*ZkB4 zE`D_0^T69rTz077Jd6GJTG90*`o3hG{Qj8!&pC5Q7uCbu#TySge)_&-g7i=PWuKGg z261U0@Si-Mzf1WgS07WPude^y^1Q62cIN@w$2s~OzcWd^;QX*)^;2^5(=+LPeF_Cf zzwnNK>^7&5KBHe`ze&0x`EUBIP4Al9M<0DZUOL(7FaBq5y!z$+_>Z6H_&3Q{^!Ge_ z!@2$ZqjP0d(#P6P|CiTXb%TEX(RsBj>C>b?ZPjybTC9(MTE{wl^gT_1^vmr2Kzi}i zOn>S;UYF&@N&k~0j@vLEd{1K^)UW?teuMPq9rxb1mgw_6jr8eoeRYiI1>daxVy!tE z1SrIgqtYw&_o!V+7tpDFYg`t8(IB<)u66I(zUNVViM~qtgTCicyo>KnwkH$mAL7Mcwoxa|)**V=V_HpvZ$ajN%{`>4)uXBOFbsk0WTOXi@+K<+i zq{m&4ADruVE>q`o)Q%D_&8+W0oq@jtm#4o=ObgVj%`|KHVSG(}%=KqFf7xODj*`xr z4!gBaI>Gvyt~XNwpwqtS2=`YM4~8t9-)LX7GYg&e&qug_)Q=zh61?e$kJ2gH5r5hF zG0k*@DTsq{Z=T}H|Gl<4-;cB}top0>mX9?FPy8^dFU-5N?^R}g*ObHjPy1fWIJINl zCI0pG2R2&fDuD2#_D9qIp#F?cl7|WSXx~fs5WKMbO6y%;`%iekA^2#&vqV0F{HJvm zrFqg+P&ptu~(cuc0UvT(t2-$^uwfsT-d4g+;D>-!0o$N z=d_&{|MC9Fhn?CdEU=u~9rE=cP88Ql%SKKZ4~#Q=E(P-!?H}sAk?fo7EgzdA+%5OU zgMLS>#{BrJQ9kt2x`omN{g5Sn%Fsg}{f?OQ&^VAabeK;Sd*N8c!0_7y+ewZ1e&=e# zIQo>+x3!7;ePX=_$hSyghvG-6es6oq$VLC-|1R|y`Nlg=j_L<|VXy4dddE2DllJ$p zQGcTIzeiC!*F0F~SH>t0a)LOV{(Wz)U+6tYdMN(=b&yHJr=K5EhdI0a_t25Gdf#&r zuSIbIyEQIoy+e9u3|(M%Y=p2qw+VckdX)`5+M9o#v*P9Z^Zwc18z)%4Y4||@ymuZ- z_0TbNh|}ahBfFt@m3n7Ae1Z79!Q(w))WC?>wCpC{#uMri59UR2>ZkRysWDd{pZoTK z_xoi)KlTNeUnk%E5e~j_`1yY-<{fv(KS_G=Z?oK~Kl$h<)Ye5G_G4^kemT(~we8W@ z$I|tS!`$o6&qb!7M|-Tz>5aoA^D9iPF9Lthkv%96IkH7*$17*c2k|#o{rxolUs3({ zYwz-N+R!0R@`UYsE8?MK=-{sg^%*CAS}qLW13xql==DR1-!JrAcd+%Tg@*E4`&F(!Tb4dPq*VVHA|v z`{dW&KJkDPozZ>?? z`;Hqvkf(XS&N-@n>xK^PutnJaZg^C5-N+8mcj?EZhi?*}Hh9#hKOW^wem{H1$){lG zV2?i@DSpd_4&zbH!1%sE?=^MCZA$!^HVwUvFSQ##zV!a1bD{daAn{h@C+Ms9AI+;p zXTL+}XTQ#i`sX+O?+D7CJiYhm{HEfoX6X9KQ+(-sB!Ug`?8jHf@PU1L&(XYE@s)f# z@&n|FzfybdGl-|Ts-J=>hq&?QIpyB`>3%>inpG4&UzwhW``!BaCCdU-;+#^Ml&uA|`HqQR4Z1CvMbY4~8 z(Wgk4Wm+-xuv_Okb-q>Yw2+VN3Fn2JFQNUzubK}kjsMrt>zt&{eX76kzoSo*9{JEi z=Shbja(pyD%NaWOdzA2u-}$CpA^g5WcS|r z*`n^TfZwJbjP`BdH}O@PeJ}De+N-_;)%pLt$%mi(c}e0S$G>Rk;HPoIwG$)$z?V;O zaNVPi6W{dkx<8}s;YW+&yH&V<2Oq(&$yfx#uL+h*6EC~vQ>1pj9ly%mm#Kc%r&B*Z z+wTFWy(=B1{BfgSSfAc|`Y`3!`{;}M6F;ST@Avm3{eC_%Wc@O8-9zJX#?bYXC;#cZ z1^m;mpD!Ceh#S41`|Bh%Lx=d7By86OfFB{gW9U)e@j2G6V7-riOA#-9Z9T&8U7piX zes03GtJ&VibdT&X=`G)Y*NpZxX7t1RhF@O&-CsBQ@eS(B#1s9g=8@`8C&;hK)ZRmj z_HOlpKH{k~J=gh5^{4j*$V5H*{bZK($hYlZ?=SLO(a?qMpRoO2H>}66vHkbb55)*K z4IcH|HZa=hi2OOv*`fM_etO{N#AY80`vu(-qWe6q`^fr#=y(5zf8SMx{P$jN*B{MI ziL*<=-@iv|l=R=Z7%E8TG4u38jPX z!|GBV$|L?``?+}6eOQysPtBj{S6lB|CsqGw=b^!S{q%iU()Z}Q4&6rkkcdy=p$GI= zKc=)v`F>pb_hC(u4t&D?WiJ<3>R%?9A73o$9}s`Tg#G)b#z>zx^oYMv1BdZPx-#+o z<1d&`e5iMvj$h)|1^V?bXm_<8d+9|d`?Ovx|7(8IHu}N8!lNAgEB%zF7mxhWZ@kZ% zeE3!4o&1`c=k~t~h7NMnzbKU)jY}G*pcmx&-}}`JKgd&iH z$!QdjDPfvWq!^eql89d^!V_?K#o%J4H zVrF}VZFtbm zH+&#Z^G%I6)4%^?==#Z1{rl@+Gk*W)173ZzABi33`V;vpZ|G3pMZ*5RNR0T3M?X$| zCwlSIzY8>J@Tl)81EapPEZ-$w^#gzFL4EuEi24K7qb-N}o?5v#K1wHRUhV4JZ~vX& zyMCDE*YG9>E9t`uCA^OnDohiWkkV5=%z< zqW;o^{q{OZej^@znfRi?V}7Ri)cnkU-yJjbp?+R`Nk99(3qQz@O4Y9^p8fS!f8N&h z${4J;iY>0k|XS|w>HVI*h@cDC4S7{5x-RfBYxBLU!8c>FX~kf?AG^kN>h8g zcr5Mj($2vyjq|)&?QjQIM_pP!nsmpzGX{lukX*SU1~Mwhm3a%sBm($sA(jot3j>K!gE+~v~rA6(jf%B3-$ zTdp%5=DE%^&nb@b++Y1wM?cQ}zbe-e+FVD-@_i_+_XW=L#yNf@*{{S|Ka-~3&`#RB zJN_Mm59;YHT|uW*>(R#^f86mql}-w)G?)(#r9S4$SC(;ccG)h!U177`kGK^Cm`7`$ zw6dwAQ+pVCtQ=ex)%$>6=i_wm%@p|-8^=9|wqoN7ai@8cU(Rv{o%*Xf_erIXr9*s5 zC#Bhhvul(o=+O@sw(jj$6U-lHYV}0FR#>6;9xwl#f#yS+hsjTEBNz1*U)Jek_odJt z)5JqR*js109P$0mXTaa7jGOPtADZ`n`FF9!rOlsE59ANu>I-{|M}D*H##cgcVMwYK}Q#t`|mUp);k@BFiQ`uMx_E-8B3J_-l) z>LVJYpi`W77eR;mluk<3j>f3R1XJ)uz52h8G{XEAQ(Le7;zjQt{(K^~Zg2f(R&aiB z_C)Jen(xZL1w$9sKVdtcK)b6MI`}6}xWRN#{p&jp#aoH}b*qRZ}(M02fxG!*O^+q<(sho zTD#ZY)|Rfl^`E~-->YxI55a%6<4t#7H1fR@!4u~!QY$&To}s{VcYo%a*Dri2JpT~p zbD!l3Dlzx<*H63mve#d9<>$`rc=|{W-1YZ8P%)x$8*%<`tRQG<{!`d zpF5nK=pL18fC!$iAMxfr<^4|zf9Ei0&qI=fJixLaaKLiLdIZJ9#;J$kst2Py?DW6K zoiO^t-+97Crizb_p$qhyFFNo=oF-Owe#kHtewgKQ9==LH77QN!S*aHuvV8^OyuS_UrF2&L7#=@wjXGE&lqIjelMOgnEsy;_TD?0BfFb?jcSzxy0Bbg(0N zi1Txmc^W~bytAE||it4p~8PMxoyXafwzwxtsUeIrRYx8$<;vaVQivJ4t zoUwZ7QPMwnQM#qINNcaw|D}J0^pCxG{O=bF z2(8WF@4v51lK!w0HhTr{T9zJu*F4&nBOQ=}PUD)dzfY%i4d0KJF3@2{f2Voe@M_NQ zd8WnBySOM31|ReTlS}lzCv|COm2}q5a2)XF>%%?kWYM{1#k1-?v3eBui03q6yMBlM zZN$*QUsKYb`2O>?;Co_koYXj|ex%oqXgvH2Gp^39{NiP|OnwV~vE$*TKm^bC9=`P- z%N~B(srVay&_2ERX3mc8twy_UQQt08jfcrKB0t#i@M$vo-hS7VulT__S35b;cz78Q z!IRng*h4ahUiv8h4*WGFIe-Hev-VHb9{JHefb5ts`LLrvxU7`#LsNzh{jTVs2kJML za&`_g6+Xjq8G}c?=M9W{uhDO##P{ou(N60(x%k!lc!T=AvBzp_`27<2Y98&EgMND8 zNBKi()98nGllpM)e5lI&E>o2QPxw*&gW83@?~nb!wM)=Ju5?x^K6-xw9pX>x_R24= z8O0Uksh`n$h5S-6bf~8~VLN{YK1ckNp%3KFICs}I`H-u9Q@yXr&hGoPbI|^T>>OFE z*G~15T5pz}WkUyhs)YUh@HFw0h8}kM=gOu`exS>YdP*?AYv|yQJkOO$FU4PS?Z}QG z{^wGJbvX%KLUjQ zX^Qf0p^#noI^(PV+VM-5C|~osb(w$Y)xWy%k*%Nkip!rnx8Ug`J&+Io#MW_sNHLYZ zS;C-0{~|iTsLulP$9m~v6$8U>6V!i#_n9MvfKjWNBbbLv8WK4tqw{cf(xIgalCz}^{g-zMMTFGT$q;?Vyc z-#Y0MA8~$=@4y*+rIS+SE7iJ@Qj|kKSow(ai|9tlANjUFQa_lZ9#un!cxn)~>qo%X zXjj|N_v;5^>qhN4s83x@9INr1Qufv3s;_N-*b`2#=zHS~%W0m3d_9&==}l+nmM^Ye zSa@LNeq_6hq9n53t&q?C#{0w~LXQdre9{yH4l0EA062p;y z(BGvE+^@eKG5P)UPg3rvp|kz1>RIFNn4yFGiC#F?GH~cu)_0qD*{ixiigu>&R}))s ze$DrhqYmHbLu%hD1A471rq*-*ke?nN{ln}1+OdBwD$jCjWqx?6+KT1xzgLt=f73O) zB;L<^(FEy-j^FBm_w!yfMf!6ed1SYK??oD)eY>SIQq-?>Q##vwOm_V!p2GK-HG2E+ z1oKCk+WJHN)`%}I;=RK5%j)+J{J`B!)oWOvJGyom+n~2T_ul2emHqm({jAO*s+{i+ z>8mtP{-A@sg;jdT`IO`{RXNZ@uG+z(`Ww(`-uQp*PbMk1WAsG3R)3P*(D}#Ss}txr zqd&=#&gnh4KPebGwC8d!9IF{Pw4Zv_iMRfNEIi@3wOp@Xb^b*27F#ZekLi1rUp>O{ z*#8rEukzB@z8l`ug8bA*&Tg%XJ-@KD#YM#@PXjf^uW?VFukXkNoiR@3KkEEfUz^Ykntb>zO<4Eqsvawb zE|5Q8bl{8ezRvt9LkE1EaL2=!X@7iUrziLXd}ApCBmO#!yA1LD=AmJ`Ua>d+^m~Ge zi$U?X*mTEkQ|*yA^St$h$%lW6gmr(n>SM~#A&x``JrFOkO`N^MOoh*} zT*kvsu^#dUk2o4NFyg4F`XYW%98G!eU0R<|y$p(@CmK zoQEDvgzHeqSO0Pa3Ixwf&we$z?A$MMe<1k&)mtx-9-xJv;~%5Hm`dLq zVbHzlB@jx$Al$9;O@YaYJCIB0nI)G=;+Z5ce;VaLFTrzxIu zi*M%au=c`cJm}BM-nz8b!xaCvTsU9gzTXSXxM1|hch9?jbjJSZPn?L@yFdTo-5>bz zlB)tleHN+DI8({9zgH3VSIQ5{!LJj9TLuri+XjZ+S;3n-yZg7JXuerF&CQRs??Sc1 z1pE~D^;zf?r!CUyy~*dNIEwRkZexsRpHA=1!@S2YJ%CQ}?#@D|@54){ zFWN8qKD&7>(<;+RrX8jbhxpd_*y^AA%~wD-eQy-)7G3(&&JW-RJC?#9!J|~| z(NFbVwSWHCrxUF2^93u_cj1tUelhRe8$6Zi?HBcZw)$s%Z(7(gqC@*F6SntL0beJ- znnyoQe8b=aePYrl$^4ed4{Vt6zSc4M@cZZo+LgD$+OTSLUS+9QNz{o^-_E z(f^DZ82v?(bYpw-AHRLKQGl?!O?~29J3G~02c5%tmvYuyeVZfiEZq9P;A7>49e#k@{mt$Fy4>2Q zcU*q(zUbK{dypT-J>?gfY9298*zpP87gut6zDGSC*=xr$58dY5pP0_4y>|i;JVU!2 zv+cZ}-}-O-9n{NE-tYq~`$O7A%omc|IJp!X8}?w7?>Aq_kPi8ElK9!i#o?OkueBcl{q)#zF-N*_ zuKSAyDd;pVjxK^zXD69IVe(-|@GpFnPMUngTY6ci z$Fx4&H)|WZATH*`w~OpSoTLpL#tFZN$PzDk6dxw&zZ$Fe_FuZcLEpF7a_Bd7-;>rH z^Fw#8eAzYIgzHQ;o>JGi@lWHSl^gJ!=?9~KAZJMTE9K@pe;iytW#RYV$-e?VHXdh- zZ_U#hM>{_HuF2{X^5ge94aR>zI_M>T3?J*xPrb9r&kvvTx2=znUeoiqtg9d0x8uvx zJZ@3yJO`9JNmPdoIvh^StEtPF}xu4u4~f9gos9^&4SYW;)5V!!$#_ zD2w>id{OU@l9%E95OipN<-=URBYzFLCrI-R#Yxl1Lp$pbw)dj~Un4%bL(~q?{u0!? z!2GnyhaaSm(wxbMeTqBjqxbYtLx=V^W?;zm_wgr8KICdGU#aewY8X1m&ollcU+*nb zhAwRXJ4SZn`!vnFYivgyriC|MJ4_pT#Es_Pv$Y@1gJ)|$ng=hc{e*IP?@*2PG^l;( zewjtJ5Af5yGXK~3FVY_srVXZTrio8F|7Msf{&jzh)(@orZ1-vD9wYzv3H|%Dnw~uU zZlJ#BQ(SZnUB9@VdN_Lj2-?eB#Yc9hC~gq9{{2=3laF}R@7L-6HnsQ0XCnUn;#>Fg zv>uJ<`t=J9Po94FFME(HCwtq5uAja3_y4TD>765c(Qm{F=RJId{6`JGU%M`w{C;+q z$fsiH`n7A-Yu(VHT~8Sp`XHDJ^1|O7+O;=6a>Qpm{OD<}UF8iP^)YH-)JKwZW#VNY^wxuY>1NfCh3|GajI^q*dE#fkno2KZ6+>)Ronkp?nm%+LID35_#cy|pMWai)Va zOu+~9`H7sfUwYR_AKTseL3qhk+fk}@b^p8bgm)ghM1J6dIM%#Z?{SKQs-Z(1HwfGB z&JllYLkGX*1b@ouJ?K1k)!Tp4dXUyDti3`1F}=UE6Eo6JRDS=bZ9jP?>_EQum#zaM zcz%7rZP)&4^u7!6H`=qm-z7Q7haX0%?-*0)L<8e8GcJ5LGk-G?42 zu8Ulc0>N|jahoP?y(9e*{0%)Cp54A49m-4W;ryp{qBLR0C(>hA>apaBH{G<&cF7+q zU;g+R5W#c*MNhQ<{pLCc;BT~t;`e*U>9GY)-ueGI?;O9qLGRcs`*S7gS7BOb+8&_y z?$rCxjn~@YohPE-Ta@16f>)sHr8k^#&JzdSbu09S9_7_~-+O)krT27p(aS7oYaZ@qY?mvur)ygaW~H_!cj{_?Q2@75)qX;-yZ0EvB09`1|787u}0; zHaKO)9k*R?#TCHQ$_W<|1KfA_JU{j9sz~7MYfr(hTqlAEo01@~gyy81<+1W0jjQ`S5FsaF(h1g>>HO13rOY=8Fz6`lmee zONK5Se_20c9)6tos)vsgU-$5N#&OfbPqMwX4Ices?9-9H;dny2B=P;$|AKg!KIf}( zaEBvSy>hyb5Aw6;xp5*-KCc(II7j0t#*xWgddHC>>C{f-clZtcfXE9DpKl&UB1kc|Vu6Or0{`&0nxiWwKPJ03vucJ7w85CO^OTd-xl6k5iusrv2kG^8Xu@Gx3xCzp=);CmjzykR$*9 z9f;sL_2GBwzsVl70scli^5a4FARl^kDL=Wd^P~KqA?)}>diKYXC_ zW$#Ns1W)o;Pks7@SMQy`-$A_$NseII4>({sV_$$`Vh!ri?9pdtdz~`*u&YeC%2f54 z*smvE=8Fz`AgmkC4x(hi}qH(eip!%xZmoj)>6CC`2*h4v>plnebq z`m)Lec-TE|VA$QJy*1(o+3oKqYQJ!h-P$))zx3*H=bbin_ny<|NT+7mpG=H6yEU(p zyfpE!Gi=8zIXboTt+!q5-*>;oKx#=!QKI>6bNW(s=r8~%B%tjUL6 zQ_`P!`LAf`5I56w0bj(;xabWX@OAQ=^zeD&rwkr()-^EVY>M%f_#bD_pg5~~=R(_vPOy51Ly>(4F_(|(3_0Ky04>~WU{lCxk4;am)>pI+KW)cBPEYXZXNUI1>$G3;{QAxr zKCn~!lUj$DyrQ8C+dJWsIqw8~iuk%mU!z@3gGYUi61w3^!GIbBYx_v#|H6(#;bz&9<2GpZ1J=9&afaj{{MsDEmJ!96XALs z>SOqG&fY(|?ATw{>OPg)@Wn#_!cRHo%TJOQKi|a@=-?;O0fs+DS#F#u>0(s_!|pEa ztrOqRZs?(QsrUPS_w0oA%JVN8pS7Mb#e0OH2k89$9MRc!5yZ}nep&sn&eLmO2YeBC zI?toH8~uC~Pmrr|Nc%UFSG#i$6+;LA)d~CiH(BDRJo+Tzu7~f?uZcq=JrIAx21Y%M zo#W~=OT6@lU3$WCe~sS$OYc#$#oqy&J1&3t`|X>o{ecapzXPgK-n|sKUgfiozWlYN zZvZv?HOYLvw`smrU_Syn#Ig9?M?On@^uMdz{F{fqu6(^0{{x8NdFP=OUb$yt|F!Tp z>MiBjC3}z$JrajG|D~Dgy*N+U@rm?!fO@RB@So@Yak6`m^7a1pDiFbwe)JQk+`7%9 zN8<0GUWOz`ur0?hab{kaQ15dL;UPMu;ud)@_F^j7mA19zU+6Wbyu07-W)`?-i9p+OH?Pn~$-}-yLyuntBLl4AR$?yX# z`;i~892jTWBb=Y|OhJ$Kqxl%si4{yf{2L>jVk-ZR8@fP``Jw|~#M1=xTZRt!7WHp? z_`K{I?TO!5(!hwb80pf)4~jE?|4I8xgW^oVEC&`ICW&NU(yDKUq(rnBfg(s zg7}&rJF9m;V2OX;UDvxyIM4k^?|wj;{A7>f#MvFKTk70I;uDvxx!*Hqg`ZnuzaYi& zTl)ptH~dz1{}nVh1TQ@BW7(T0NiOn3KXRVXq+T7SsiPwQKyKwcH!ezUgXc-k*|fEh z>;+FekQw@4E*b`Z3V~hQAx6Z>yZ6i**eQyYqw-$2ouW>&IYsX{FxztlIY= zyY)W)%%`AH@V>oZnG<&3{J9kVhTSE~I~R!H`RnlFKR$c2-5Qj#l$N#`@L*j$Hpo(U!SFze+spF$~3Hz^Gd;9IQ z$w$4#27R2^ zzci>mHC}H|hdlA$4OiRY*z`N#2YYixCr9_{il6OYQSaijBl+yq{mxB4I&6dK^AzF( zzNin49ZFRnN+&26^r#oVKW>(v^rG)Xx0-M08)spn6GdT6%Z@J9#@9k4N1%C(j42ch5)Qi@=m8w2+UyS0dUppBw`Ot5eu_PhuSuD@L&8S=MVoo)GX=J%vU|=JJg)P2lYPVJJf>7 zhreW>(vr!CzJtC)tr)tXUgy;f4E^=Hrc(wV*1v&K|7qT<7(dzBD?MPBp0JtI0eoWI|{Cysh*YAgH=Kk5B1eBldl+byxvS3dKh?+?5DxpOnK%?~KQ&Q$ue2!jv& zSTQjC*d?4g)!9wDSlYnw<0$EJ#P{nz?D;L-6Q=i*hktwh;TqE*0}uR|_3i~Llm8$; zYMyoEj*iD2U*GU!hwQli>VV+KDVFCkrP%7L?>xE5`dh4{eEIoqbS;C-$pG5~4el9S7td}lUF>u&VQ~wF#`}rAq`0L(U zf3WZSpws@Y-e+}=*xplvajQDZIadGuROeVTr$uoS^eOLqT+n-+-pllU7w`xlKOHn~ z=zS1{V2A%+S2p^=AO3rt&U41T6xo6LN)aCPUYGOe^&zdZTv1^?Wz2@rlSvAos=)Gzq!^=iLclh1z-@4UA2wwJsN(DswdFn`V(E3Q*` zdgbF?{@l5Ke`}I?3k4f+Mc>MbC`>{#h(>HG9fluqM-uF-c{(ALu+TYW>y5;fl@8KKt zJ3cyZqI>vKXZ89oOW2+_fnU3nH|o((5MMTU__bnS_%%=aCy2N040VbJSWg z-!o-iI4M|c?0rD*f6vq=|2Mw&*i|#QnRUx*w3cbne#??04#>pM-@-rs=w z8!>e7!xZ%>65sE8BeZ8f?rXf~z>cS&)3~d6)c1=1dGaRZ`SGapT|f`_}!BlmUkE%JSMzSO0&^!eut_dD?iY zGp3^@6 z|7sLhh_@nP8=qnSXXs#Witq%}LH>>{;nsz9kG0md{yy(-o686CW!V3H!;K$0XV)hG z-&T|7qrbFrtlxb(;)ygUGh{`q+iP>wN1q=o#koT*0@12%ekr8;;$!=4HRa-x$Y6zV7^1Vk&txZ(m1r zD2Mp1kiMaE0UrHE)4;HMm~fkEzxgQq8S}n()pzoP?ACh26+1wqSZx1quGc(Z`5VLY z60kcz=ImO-Wye-|ZHMD;y?o1X`2p=X<;jyAki#!UmY<&2=N!Lr;z4KStO-Q$ob~W^ zZ(nr#a_8gkz#l{6130Ln8S|_F7d~C`73`-Vg5Lgp1Mzd6UdV^uE%M2K&$T=GF=yxk zz2=J!1GW->;tGFU?2RgW%w4-SOv(_g#J2aD6}Q z$G+k0c|ZI2kgNHc<|8WSxV!%YU(T41j8G0J!ua#f0Sq(0%vALOdiYu6zus%qZtOWr z(E0O3tzY`TpVXxsJ08IQP2s;8)ieB`F);j4C0(9)t1ooM13Ra@^#kdx__yUyUutKo z?&x@Izwq4kR=j=QhXEnKPI+s)?AWUHPp|XF$CeNKpD-SouXF8^mpCSx&xP@5?19}~ z!m0Cm?M@pQc8`%RNBn@en?C=db>v?>(|Szf5d2bJy>}i^Ccl1uL7eJ)Sn<=m`H&Ny zI8uD+lE6=M=hkOgCsrJ%`8{k?cAg*EZ{tquhW*x)LFb=G(eLIIZ;1RJ)b+si5XFJk z_gsC?+}Esl`uXd4)AJug2f5mxQYv|V>aRm;ebT2BtnVNME1hjUGI2q#pJ#j@!TK0C zbYcHU*#ADFO?z7&z0RL>JiOK^*}BV--GhciFGI^ zHSYXo^|k%4`f0tdPH{aJ`r7uQ_j%C`U)0-P)V7sMo>IlD;uQSR{{8P8CaJIF>s*-5 zndcTT4!+$R4=KX_z2#N%%X#!A;tK|kdM_Cm^`0Z$IPtOv`swMJcXNG9_xmgtd!z5~ zBx;=W?-3GDq=Bp%^{?L%?;1VBaoYQR-$~}DzB9A_1HZ?TOS^tu{kZ+zn4o>llYX5K zMt-*Op!Ybvk5niJdWY?wus!z=x#eY?+*rxQPs^0+XK#u59YY5_rsg_6lCN8$9tK?z8u}_tPr*s6KW)^6~?%Pefn4*U>jT`eQDf|B-&{ zAl@v z`+>r}QGbu}>X$VxsNSo+chkEn8uEqn!oz)xul|Pi) z`5Np}J&jxx*&DVy@{b+o?3G<5Lx*-YPT1dXO%q=?^sp;+1ml?JB%3B5`YQI7CYawg zbkHx!xRzdu-*_dm1N~mQ7mke>81Xzzzm5{$fBh`@9@aZIqWQP#NB%`zpb89j1~O<2(&?fqnCv#vas1;s?(D z3{%p@at4OoRhBCd->=_8zvkc9r**WYFFF1te;uu7{O7uOh5QTGpS*Io_yUFafZpGC znk4<7_gi3s>#zmgX_`d!bx`ip+Q-_QR! z(x3L)GCzece7*JF*tyxQ<9Anx{J?5OnHk^tYQHe|OV^(inbs%|W#PvO-hVE+CFVDo z3J-e7Q9q$n?{WV8+TTyiToUOWwzoZz-ZS2J zFIs=H>)W97*DXY6zi$AYzb>Hf;_Ufy=&QD?RQ}fbMEM{W2k;x_G5&e+j%SDNf!DgO z|K;x%?onli_Pk2z4A4d>(^c}|Iz;9YA6^ye>${u%J0{BF8q!he01-8XAyi5SL!2`PLe)xdE_6| zlg`H{72o_m$^Kp$=yd*k^v7%mq{}@-IM5Yzx}RR(^(gM&Z#&n0@VX}*KIqrZTb>=d z?_S^QNN)U!$X@tG{fbh>wa)X$&HeEG$?lJ^RA(TT(xhdlBfIj1?ygX!ScJ`&a+oW{)8U72VcLBt9D*CbeNBe4t&urtIVG? zbigMGw>*56c6B`bF!AxLBE7(8g7J~^@MFYhJbZ!pyuqX0PsLrk&M<$pCx6Zy{r>ny zFf4es+2xkAmw$S(7w|XQtM2WuvYgI$AYV`5^BMD!hLHn5Hy?5BOuwhAaW?aK)c(+a z=-!1*$b9+bZr$()3*)~92tJiZ9ew(0`it#&!teoIvE}HJ#4E0CI}Yk~Nc_MbcBow` zRXkNGFUxy%K;N%@O-QdGA9{4D$GE4*l%ZRc+&1kUeZu-_=DcC}nkark`zbH}XID=4 zj~F`W@1JY2zpDT~ZSpCSkJ@R~@PYnnpGxJoah4NY^Md;AA00jE=ND8oetL` zyU|WX2fk=WIp!A)9qK{G|7boS_T+HLuhQ$EpTK`!8~SJwd$c5&qSK_f3Ca zRO>g--LmQan!Af0e5H?HPBchix8x~JUK{xZ?>qkfYMXjyNvCq)2e}2}XZs!Z{F=S* zQEESf)`fH)XFew^H{broOS>NYmGIhb+ppaVMS|z4=O1}*tJVv5;_tAXQLp%Q&OXVr z{Z+_kC6~WA zPmc=@=&T+~P>);hPhPQV>h#dvR*wh3IC%d4_amQLf78QL_#6Fh-tYt5HuV}X8Q2de zf9mWXW(t1&`r(Yphg~ho>oS#pM-3hN57B`y`iU{-PZ+vzd?ufUhaV=sW$*#tSjWJK z!@BDGdS_3+bvpP#`{YVP2M4I?sb@xtGI(mJ`m z-)R^+_*L_Cl!O1Km><8v*)P1l=S&(r`bT|7q~8@yoBTlc8T~}g}({A2l>t*U&e5wl2_A5Iw|KR_uv*VUqjEA2m!M_Dxo_B9UdcyfJ&s6tdW(RQeBj&$-nc*CwD z@w1)J_3r~w+zg6i?Gt^SMw~c&=Y4zpb^C^s8@v}#uD>3Uy*`@fqaH}|)N%1GXe|-h(9p1kGZ1+E@UHk`vgJDxi5XYuvBYF{0%uH+2>cEgiNc)u|Nb*`cHp&IkDok zkKk|UG2?uP*DvNMZZW9|?*$6}AXu;>1xU;T0de_OwYAAkn9HOim8e7DBU zUqpUbzvS0ps`Hcncc=2Z?#KV+hP#eDlf0Vu^F`|fCxCJA%rAXpZlrO&vRy+t+90CqZec$u2(l1=SjWMk-rMti@e3aG(J#9HBoE9r&U@8D;*sp#wfaK2;B2qhISDK1F=f!&eyBZ4aL&KKSA551$pj zy|{iXX<+nYRrUjE;`{ew(fg;)9qRovw)97D&{_^`#sj|o`=`n|3ip5D>lyRPiqQ|_ zO~adSj55E$RP`mfQ^YU&{d4Z(qdXV%e$M&y+waZ%()snqt*-i=)?{QG?AQEpw(~yP z&ztSMkH&VT+855>>Bh4P^=UALF5!5cb>qJLG|K!oQ{kQeqH{TmI@c4n2k!rAeyn(? z{U#b;5$B~}IX~I&NP*82Uu6pUK|7prey48oAy@l}i#oppI_)R==Wq(Y?bR=NtJBXv zXWWtA%$I)tIh+xbANX>{JhVwZMMDSu{Bt;(r;QuBpg);c?}cMi21cBv$iG8;|NZjd zJ_2u?)VQztfsF%fZ@S&=FN{>xceXWz8!zt@$hp%1kdVgZSmUvM?U{&{0;j? zZlhnBN}j#n5&fm;P!4fXA$@}>@Bv+{X<*nrOt{T-P`~Bx_iH>HdaOK0dtZ=&2koWc zor6u??(FElzdv&yT>R~L3%knXW7`4Z-QPE?kq-LUc-MCx;-B_@H(-k8?0K@lZ*$_m zcKU-~zxZshT*}ZvuGTjtPyKn?&>=oYdf`~vz~MMR{^P{kID<}j;PIAcE%`Pk!(57guV8%XWePh9n1h{pv^lYV^pR`5xOe`KZ4# z;VM)4vuo%A`SV2w`H0hG!`YiU)xYD-++ZT?X|t{d>gv9q`06 zyWTHbG2V{d<@)J5`6v$mdHK{<#!=uhIBSuYB2|RNrT4-4p)7yn6U}cWzaFD|zz#^C*&6_2~TbBBIOiJPYK( zFVaV;&Zms&TmtnfALh>CNw36jd;OsE7-Kx2qI$>}I>=LbrFMPS)Veqg+=eKI)H)-eWw zIJh4p$`AV)>QNwG^{y0gi2f^1zrCOHiJE%?L#PQdra80FQN>RkWi z06p$-Vq)#_OI%zt)rzmv~d>%Ol64BE?(){K;Cmx9O0-qM!)3Arn6Q4DB^m8KyMnBhJe^Dg9-+UMI%I0#t=N)wK zo8nylcK(d+2RNS#{a@SfiZ#E!*Pe$czeRc50}(t+U2xO*6Hg|-kH6vXF7s3CIC~|} z-ZKY(iw@=BkL2$heU>Tkusd&H*j*$4QQ`;LU0=4>?#zPC!}ZA7>^?edvB7=r|Ge+N zZ~tk--$4(wt0v`z8zKQN{@9P+KK-^|tcCor|7O0{hYDRc|IDr$)w|^rZX^U{PdRqk zJu-`}_!9U8_6~K7y+Pf~nCFfB-twC{zK)uF=#>$CoSXm14`aeRx$~##0yvC+<~I!; z@Cm|G29J8`8W{Cdr5%YsIDPxo6ZF%3NZ)a2eqDJwn)icF>r|R2h^}eq;4iI-Dh+Vq zQ{ef0eQzSXQV^j(De_#U@D=KheCVO|Rjog!w|08A3?2N`C2Z#_z!!!8V^oj8=ZMc3 zd>H=*hF?>(ca(VP3H|hh>q*`{v%1f2w)p>SxZ@s+wap z_W9dy6izeXmk#rFzJJj8B|htt&-&Y)x=iWb7ncSIKAEQT%jCt*uez_VxM$?AupLp} zdgOEINx%B-yK62 z=rvz-;2XB5KRLTHOobm|xtxbj5MMBO#7W7(Vf&+h#)Tq7**(G~G3q1;yUuLR(|El1CE|jy9)AJGP@xede z^xf~@zQ^=^IXc&T5f}&0_MhKz^P4{Q>0R(Q;!tt~%YMKC%Ykt?{1D@UDd=IB-b<-Y zENAjzSDX6BiI;y%h7NHkI`BmtR+!%~big;ruj%14#J3F|aTt5p=?%V!!%5XQ@q^;9 z?46&|`6$(!>;+%cOLb!>XD1+nXQLIC+Iqijt~wciBVY6WwSfqpy*~fO_UGKa;nny% zY_HNsDbGFG^H}gx+1L~MgK*p6VRzTSuscsU@rcuNklp@!klu3!*{%1T>tRUnEVb~s zM|NNC8++q#*j1uD{a&c}*?WRum*`L~tbdkkFa;iVH4O~Aa)jGV2ioP$J9WSBAiFfL z+!2Cx61x|?Q-*fwgR8PZ^8Em5j|k( zkNhB(XRL#z9&_|*rl1SQ9q;?vtjUMIF~S{whao?Y8amXs=)f2CJ;wYALkE0Ie)jN1 z;#&rf_~;lI@sT23yyff}6dwhDA7qyEgWB&{Ja8VKZ+z+2>z3Z)`HS&4>O=kTnLq^3 zZ#Vw(dKa8<&pP-Uek}X)ynUA<^&Mxb@nAx5$S3-pp(UutuaDjIjBj4L_ghX*q{rDn z1kZ}U`QoLu55Msg{ze=~4&Z>rj5r|MSmyC4exSd9elTb95eHrBnIvBOE=5C!I1nA= zqrS(PUpI8XH_30(;8EXG21b2nN!KNQP<^+&_c6_z2lWSO?yLNX2aYb>?4@7a^Vw>6 zuORBX@Mq_rm0(ElJhJ8+E1$jKjc{CsKg!J4e6-*Dg5?u-00EzGEjaws7cV^Rqu>cX zlj6hmc=56CCzj8uC>T7sRbSp>|JR-j=S8S@@j)J7=?55bp!XG}ii7kM&dw}T;gzC% z*iU%xEqT%-A9f@NYkn&Kj~hC~hv-laaWKLBmZ1Z_O~14~e3kgvlTrL4ZjuH@+@wjD zCcb~%1m{k_?D*(jKE-vv--`iXy-#XCPUT>ap1^lA-m5D{Kg^5$-+>ureuJs?Km6;z zpQ`_`=RV=L#9y2}sc-iBCqq1RgdJ0qlPBKFlO3pce|^1l@}l3Hr{DjLJm^&;?A@mo zE3E4DY#MshXWPJ`-=C%2ryPBMeWU%?67Pd~YVPQlr}u&aKgPWKf->YcTR*X8#(8DS z&oyuObNIaqg$yDB*AP3*sYqTE74h_;ld=!pPH3&L~rq zM|}A23nh~ey)%S$&O`Rs3?2Ff(Sa}GWs>cY8a(1CZD7RF2MAb;Kj@$%a$ zM_d%nX_!BKZlX!LLk~Q6RnfvPy7yz0`5mUxfqbU@+nnR<`Q+c5_kVo1>JG>UAKmYf z`Rn`h%h+7U=iR5?yY2PEE_+pcbPl1s2tI-SGsfL6>orUL6D&W%w93@UiO&0JT~g~_ zWpnQs;y?a3XOBJa7qrh2dKlGE2mF7%7;<|gZi!aI5I5cYLf_64<%)roR zf_6?AJlbQ!z^IQh=~~1~59p@{bQ*VOyT@PUl_s8z+8@SU|GQ=Ven5tFDhJuHU-wR^ zU2DJ6_TNF78S`wN7t!~1;D`P)wr=mf!GzHd^7Or%>Ra+!h7SJi6867?8zVmTTx2)m zK>Jww4lZNzp}*`_nm75-OW(msAJs?E&>;@Sd*N8!z^KO&>NiQee( zz`psSLpjt#k@OX&z$4CU28P`+!VRYV$DO&0*NW+|AJ#o7I)6OqcNrQFx_(#mUGg9F zy9|@Z_wpZp!P!0NcNyBpIeOjiG(!48zsun3Gn@XSU+mSVPX2@R_uIetA9eUfAJRMz zb$|!wPsUGl{F7~Gr|2IZ{ln|w;*TSprq_A(HucD{+>_ZyzoW5FMZjO@;KxW`BK=y+ z{Cx?HnU-Gf4HbUpRwMl_S1x;&e}5k0M*XcXM?8^&PV)v|f1gh0`h34wx}Z(YxIatx zg~k8w{Fr7s!W8AvZpXdzI4#;&CY^2X&|BmB#4PuSY1|&!)6KsW?^bW{)41H3g-++_ zNB)oZh_z`);zj3&4ATNr=+n=C`o3EB`zgu={mJzG!VSX@{gck8P0#-sKV3tI{wVR1 z(<^>(^qv;>|Gd{>jPx1OK`#8J^O5O)EZV}6-Ky+;f7>i(Jr>4!-tdvy-7@QSnd{oYSgFnplD+LJv8iTcvK zLF+@(zt&qm)*#%zq_@6wug943O*!~ieV5Wa?aYeqAI>k%-k|4V{Ywvx-zh_f@jKrO z$4Ul9oYWcrW5f?S|K{Hpq4kPE~V zaZ>f-B-h+{k>`h0zZ*Mu#WuU`r7y3))ag$HgdY;GIeWGKs(E^OrN|F9PBtN*e3Wz!&jRVE&k)1HM9j6%U^# ze!}1pH&|bZOeN3WzXm^v4&~sFG15<{T!4q&4FkjOB;gj*L3U@n z@BE6Nc6tr6JI(!_)3||pO!|-o3zu8rKIjL#v;T7C*9IbZUc76c)0RDRt?7N40`oQB z()ve%>#rzd`KbRsY5tKnR@U3n6AEps^J5^ng{viM1vIm z{eQiE3D_e=wRY#583=no!MI^imWTpj5d(+>Ml`Z!9D#@m8DJp8G81Nzu!wO%Bb)Jx z5K%9Y%_uGr7a}ewdy3={6h6*F z`5o1;=OaFE>EC~}<%zv~)+G*LNAz#T|0!S|DCMP{lXsc>LfHGD74WyMa-u(<+xR`% zF#Y-5wve5oKZZM3BXf;VUwmxz7plZLpR2gu#&}8NIY;=!t|H3m=PEvDWRPF;$)7$~ z@q3w1^*N*KlQaFkG0%lk&&tWu=LXR;w%OR%x^YT(`}^cOfg{LGgHP-efAKkj*n_{C z;Lln7;x|4|P!IN_lEvrtx|PeeDlWSymdfmz34zg}qFMELdZ z2*mzw{Bq+N-#BJVBX;t?@ay-KGT^^wuj4O^x}3INcE8l?ITNAoA9lZ-wSL2XIdlC6 z>lL%sZ@893)W2WQfPG!y2pE52+COAmOB~=oms$c}27KBt?8md#bJ&k(t>>_R&RWmm z`o&_`bK0-GlQ1K1a8IKkaAI|7s|w`ybzj&m+I>lkc8$K|h|g z{=#*O#jd}MP+$C?)Akj+xK6?6KH4?J`i|J|jejVo*C{6BAM$HH`R@Id-}zhQI!o6l z$9>L&9KD{>gw_M)o{|XJj}DvvHqSJE_!c_oX~%7K`nA8`>y7Zo61~4oIg&5-W&UN# z$4@fI{qF+k!YA`T@=03aq=NjWpU-JqX|X$obPpIbpR>o=WYfIY%=?Yh$IBjPv*4@Y zJyr4u3LnSW;sWx5;vwoB<~^UMfO(+Eb?u(41M2rr(-^P0f5_*EmQ`Nr<2;4P_ei*I zEcM8|UBBNwvgAm+as1_chV{iGMt|t*q>;A2t0DbFzeiuN%1OR{|Jt7C1=&$X`MM=X z^vtREuj!|@#V7q|V5KF#y0AAoH?>Ff8oj{Wrz*&gTlu1w`_H?GDJx&}N#PtU{l)oA z&f*h&O8&G{x6%?{sgb!KG(l&5sNMsaZ&c6r@7v|hG3n}`Pd4j})` zL!a2pIUD&!4?bV$ddMRveqmk2>|;j%%#x{pWggI+^Unif$S(qIJH?+I4;lBg&wgJ` z+Ovc5_IpgOpPivqzt~e_da2RNu8%f(afRo8eg~D~R(qux$As6`kMn7sr_$d+EucPI zKhc}tL9HTR&j(>RuP?}DG_ z(P)3#;&b&{Mn2I?+BJ{-ip3}N2ISQgJr8=*qDvffthB^I6nuTqgYJXU|6?yP=fybR zAnubr|7!X~bd^i^C*M=W?|#L$G=7-%yQ{h$BhmaX?ZI(^$lqNpLB6TqU0;2ge?26F z{5sIqS^Urey}gTxUpt>Vc>SC6Nz9kI&TYr9=(!yV5h+h2&*$(yJL~(`{Jj({$NoNw z#39eykS`PU$06sle4lsn{cDR);%k7kJ)aeN9Q5c`Q@KLtcd!!{UG9(6XLA0>%6D~~ zcYn-T`Qmq;|Dm3|Kb9;$H@=tFthDIE?_jqry7Ystm6rC8{mYCS1JLO=w!NVERnLE7 zk>GKi_Z{BP<6Havlt$Vf*F~>_#V2|V93#IBdXQey-ZQDi5ciLuc5}9w+9~&shI&u81$jyE+4hM2z0;@T zx9E`tUpauEx=1|(RZsLo=GB9er7$pp`PkBJ8rqp!OO3aq-$@4awIMO%loPv$;E!!T^@rGJPG8^k)C$JhO6<;m?$( zdJ7-t!JKDOuAXOhp`Se-iJhEhjx4)`-atCKgRMupZfSE za%n%;KcDLO)UfoEaigH-w&qqZ-+J?v56Yg2t(WM{{h3+wEAF=t`8{0yJE=X?Cz^>Los<2~ zXAR_!fm)x`j>f))evee*m(P)0PvAIf&$oi&oP5~>{r!P{;Jk<9UmwpkVvodkANu89 zKfNCby#>0n(=_gdUIjg_=+P}r{V9ts<3!dF8n=kYC2gdK6`bF9=ruGl((4!lmkLb&BW!C;7{XJ{{kn3U#?W=iljPHhf1BCXfM zxNhH}-c~vB2lp{%?OSpmVT{Fa2VsAuy@{Ru_NI|8S^J#woWS+` zG3qN=<-C3Z{>AQR)-5?=r*6l>HNJj6Y0rUGPTG_EB)p%}K4%xdeQ~7qxlo>~>_BeD zDkpkztS46Chcfu{7Qg7jeNgJb`(oMRbH|&dO@G?yS!pkh(9Z{;(?1g5ykwk6y}^KpA`|bB}Mb850qPOT7MY;^M z>k}Tiy!nSZm&S8}VeP}X+y*zz8*bV8p#wKqdJwtl2<(%&`OxEgQoy}FbKX&RZMtgt zSLAQeL!ZafdK6J#mG$CWa+7IK&Qy;bpvOy5#-%&` zt0sTD?G|A@Oi%2032vLs8`oT#ccq?f{F4C+QS8#|s5vWN{5yjFG0^GXip3}WgM1=a z;;w=GuEi(xF68wUJp=m4qD!1cpJVhExe})>w08pZp#Eg{5BBRi)<;WQP3L36$N3fS zGyEP*eYYu}_!Z6NT3{}I2afX=p^86C>N_hKJIn~fb=i|+M*D=mJ_z%OOc88IXquEi()hQjN4A(ihpJtx}5PhnYW9@TEy)9L5Y8w-G zUC`+_v5S}YJfyy_#_=UAo_Ifb2m&8&p7o3ie;@I-o$Pq}04lln_$zmM&EfBlcO9v>Ehd*z<~qU>IW#=QHD z#69bgJW11jNxLFL`$1(l_=EaE!^#)`W{@rb>EE8k=jySHd?MEy50M{#zP}&D zK~E}r4Svd4bcxfvm6rbDfUg94Q2&rPZK&T>>E3S6sj%JXe&dI^x#+V@d>kSK_qt~D zeFy*kl5PGhe~TabsE@xZ&-q(t<#hfgaYi|ZNkR8I^730>boPyRdBdsryQB1?KEf;Y zBwk?r)!oPFlX;hsp8;L??0OCtf_s%de9@2J``9D@BY%sWD){;P?9_JvdBSJQIYJ2T zb=2iQUvd1a)^C)*CB7(!Y3j!`{UT}Cr}N@(M7?)6cEy0gFaF^95Vx#%C9Hh0qlfbR zeR#HG&f=5!BcBM7_$wj5Zt)4d33*LLFM!@r^fB7KZ_y<#M^;+mvI)NE9>&g~xD-RQnTmmt_qtUmw6Y%KI)2Zb~iXq8tm_Fu=`?z+5HUG_6Pj{gYlObj2(>pLk%VmH<&xZpo8_zQQ7#b zhIPZ(ao}G8KAclYzt*HXCmU>^VlZ*4!2z&#no0Kx2D_^a=5YS6zuKfTMT7Y@29p;U zOsq9HT4%6&p~3hD;3k8yHyO-hpQFQl4(yW@F`w*QZulw{gSoc?v0mSKyGf_7FzCF? z;21b~w@DYSGMK;GVDmi&8}Bt(d7r`Zb-=p8{%4JUOCK=l(TxUsA2Qhan8Dh|4aPrd zaQG>M{ZAY0e#T(qPJ`vo8qBl}#=dCK`Le+=u<=!su5}ESzGbj}kHN~l2Fv#uOnevV z?-^`7U@-YZk~*WqKPT}uHWek$>yt4!B-qYA4ba$-Uyq)~vUc_xp(phssY18`EE7zQJblJPd3E3T&BZ&iy zADep{Ie)$W#`M?jd*2_BzqIoi^Bz3M!M7a$uMH6C)yH=ih&K5ngKs~1jSC4Cl)L|v9JFO|9Uk2RaNziJiA_=YYB?0 zpnChN-i|t_Fp;yb-)>#6Zdb|Y7o=wo^^TREjga_D>_5N#C0=`Ke~JF&^P_E-@ayNyS^TNz2FGKNd^^r&`HlP6 z!@nE(VSeL&50UYhe6G2_M-MQ5DV<^BKZUfkk=WbaDp>zK__TjU%AeFL%wEQG`?IDV z-Y*yrEUO-0m554rifuwBxzHhxu*=`KgcSX~%PYKNHVk_HY~} zHlSx0DDuSrCG|cc>m3EyCG|5d@|XR;jf?C-#*fsi`@G<|D1lG=h3%~Gzc!!y_q=u< zsCo-(UzF_}eMxXTm(;jL{{_XP_`9HfH(?h4U=eW?WFO~y^lL@Q<9&V@VqbfAe>=?5 zx1##zLi~2za~?r{(U(_{UG;J~-_XdAx%BA5Z)J z-`q3UpBeCl)jM2m&NYXPV=PCksd_u=d4+P?GwPi+A7p*R=plZ4b0_%iW&5VU$8zFB zX_x#F!Te$I!};J4`>B*~%a!)yKIg3aIo}8DH5QIDKK~N+{k#SH`oP$m&3)ZD)bF2G zHrU=I_-s4GKMgf5F%ETt##a~$jzuk{G&tSh}9};wJo_GH#9On01 zCS;yb1)uht{+*0jcGc84#<&Xdvu#&*hs8bDreEf_tD(jv_R|9RY`g4wXFWIZ`D)g4 z6UR+r3-$Jup89*j^pA76u_sK=$@%4g=OD3%dg}gc$A|E-KTpnEhsfhRY*v5fyquVa z9Tgzw=S`%0K+#M3*&yV3XAC~uAHpA3-<6sbj|Fw#UWniJBj>+i{fzBQ6OZZ6Wz~zt`iZ9ry0v^WHb(`yQR6On>5d$Mpz3-laq4 zEkl&I>yvgX?D5pw*&Yx0yu&!M<%%6l6RXSpkS%*gpc#i zS^E#XPtDqY;JQ1J_aEmK#-1cF2juvbQ1dVPsSLg_`(~|6@P0t#I^RImUsK}`>yI97 z^bV_^-&1Eii#@#DGV|8CIlnGIuJB4+)t>H;E7o5Psh{f~`niU63rhXen>bMQmehMQ ztT+0~h3!rb&2t?2b-naAk$%rZuJDW9y%4`w0_qq3lH#Y|!^UxE5#xSPf2Dl-PxKD* zYx-6G{_3cC2K`h3pDj=98Z2@=t?cTL7wQ@02ho@9K%~BUeXyeRrrcOII35^>lkdNU z%wIVlo)xduk61*#H6Y_A6%x1Y5ItG{tobwRB{FVfuU74=#$&c`8hm#9+T(G5|AWl$ zQv~=asGYd(Qd9LO)bka`_jW-25?}2_%+rJV0q-~Be_o<5_oaxLV~n4|_M0;y<9re2 zwBHzCoKJ`8!E(edVf!bgWBqX# zJu29aI{0Y6*louh=K-`^@_D&s=8X^RchTeg^=DMvGwxF03#)(TdKJ#^&)T=+yn@L2 zUKRD1zG&8`T1xMhdVhd^=m+R6{-7O1?oW%)BtG=-`f;4h9B=%^a^!D^Jg4HNYTPD&&^ZF(uPyb*5%mv~Uw_u(_%k8;1j)DKbk_bO$7LeN=hg}SIBltU z0{zhkpKhPJYM)vD$S-0%6@Pa^{1Mdtwm;Z!!^S=K10wrF=S1U=u=#c?<8M#;XNYpz zKjlT*TTtT!^$&Vp5&tyQ^Dy-ZiWlL}so%+2NWN>!yz!0Wt{&eyNBjN4IEbwX?$-%r zC-n}RKa1Y6Mch|{^seAsmR{F#)Or#1?uO{?gv=kp#;=}Q525_9_Gzo%6Q0FiJ1E%i zVe$(h_J;ANLdJtI{)+O?EdBNG#Lwhkq(2Lb>>v8~oM-7%QE|-sdRRQ<)p*Ic58HoD zhwz6z4^`Cj5akEm&+Pf?tbJ9EYsArO{r8P@$ohBuq~QLa!gn(%Zy`VX#&vZ*j^$;( z;Ql>tyyALL9eQwHF?x}|-_TE;5Pg#;`S};pSH>$RWWFBMZ|rv9J}=`)^yMY?(OzQt zWPdvhRK1kb03XYVOwm(+kC*p@S^L7X)^Au3F>#90GvvHo7JMv6J?o3OkBUFJ?#Azx zvwi7HLAQ>1-~HfxRX>MymHzto<|uy@qJKf{Gt6oi{X15(;;j?X?}Oq^+P$IpXUT7d z^q0`*Ks67aB|o9=OY~>hzD;@&@gVl<-^rl-pmPWkKV0ACJd*r&{Md0eYaN)+xeKiW zd-BwG_Jit`xaGM6BIjk3=iyULe@g-LzzR_85Wnc}?6bZm_;f!ksre)0IP89xP;oyi z4jRY!$Jxnv6tX_kQS%MzGi$$GpWC(V6#w!$i8y$@@#n1X6VrduHyD0fuK2t2I=_7j z`9tD?>uK7#AB5kFkC1s(9(+2U^2aVN zo+j&p>b#vT*S1T~3vIq2zYd^h^mM;n`RDufWWP><&z39oQ%}CHL4NI5mLpbGy$y9= zp`2Dgz2g6Y;%9q?-A5~mpYamLufO-W5Wo1Bb`iNw%y=oN{zCg|h57wU{K|RJta#^79w7Y}T{T}H@pp6=e_W71%zyfOb>t7)KM?u)yHyMMTlk$t%!}+e zoz+j+e#F!n{{ErAw?w=0;A6RopVj<|{9%5Js&kdI{Gh+9GE07QxxXD}$&ZEH7sB*! zsORj3C zzDySH!<2zdU>{h=`xRYa2Jah`fN`A5Zvm4ypPmO+fo)(E=e*OvB5(kVz0}x~0S+{w%Nq903y< zlb-`tfGywv7(3GNWq>7M1K0yPIM0#-7JxNi66Z+rz#g!La}p_>8)yNO*q?6#`@ksn zw=2LFZ~#nWe|7*YU_Lwm#;_k(2gb0kl>zpFdF z0j5uaUcezRezKuwfgRuoSj6*x9hl4;{yeY>Yy*eD`0F4SSOzwMec%YsWr^1t{v5CZ zYynf4j~9SB%wH=&2lKQFum#MYZshiWPQj#8zyh!Z%&ao`C13;C13G7z{4%f!>;t11 zXVbtUunrsnW!RPX;rn|Vd5NIpYw@JO2w7`iTp_PTvKk;Hut@|cJ8da{G_{I!Tcoh zGcPgkeShq@FMQ`Y$NlO3%+E3(dVJ!h%g!n-shlkNVvqMBO!sdh-}5)`_lq^t7yLbY zAg>C%^r8EP#V0<0p2!owrFSxV^8Q9Te_uh<2iW)LeV_bE{C=zE&qagf^E;(l4uAJZ z%W+VzrVp`?s_E@*=GW``?{R)qfY^s$M!@KKh$CPcm;)Ap6<{6M0@5FC$m?2kX+Q6S zkuDR_`yiN`M*FQ_^QJYc&R@B4{iZWFy5DPf_1d%71-EDRe52>ZKfdAI-@J22?{^BM zJ*%KM_Q!iAuIz>4=FE-j)*rX(;&q!g2G`SpyboXc_uOS$J>q>P%&lkozW?4v57-@< zoLkw)PoJF6u;|hrc>pK$t!vf&kI#WZ(MKq?e7wcpZHzjw#A=v zmN_l8|G@8BxVm~55&BH*RdF1ly*7Ozd*f@3-6K(A2IsW6rH~}-S*QXY;U{WB;L1@irvfBQ}p2XRfyD=NdM^eWxmEC^wD&u zi$GLg(+V8O8sYxYw&<>2o3{~z+>6Nj@ygQbGu=DjnoB0LGRLv! zWw{N;zaJa_^p5*hzUnxU;pWd(KzC((*Y9t6<=np={HHHVLdrLg&w1G&YMJ9t{M2|d z@9H3*^RlZRzV5)r6JGKe+W#Yvy35v>R<9 z^1goNstv38AuMTs${a)9Pv3a&o$vqlo4zU)x%o>IZ!-3i@7|ApuWqz3?Ug}3?Y#NU z+i!~4?Qy5EgZV$d4?|03fb+IPq{r|uNg&aa33b>Cm{#n0?=*V&RxJ4>S#l;`&&`>I_py8iMb zCI0DumP?>q{5z(f6p(HJ52*a*`%4q^%Q@sb5ApRSgMH8s{q8>3NPp4w)xTrD>oWN+ zDf}KQ8~b;A{ae4Vh3j`+E~Uy9FEaIIQSRN(9$dR+#$QhSn%HRgD&V_!c-rkzmrpLq zZ=n7*^4~DL_ol5fUbg4gI{c{p+6VtHPdsAD)+v9z(jNSNH2qqJoH5Eh?N6I`+9ol- zT;&I*9b)I1c&%?Rn7Y{b=j82n-)dXsR~e7`Z!qHs%N4=D?Jqz72j2UPRmSct_#5E+ z@=h;%fX~!&-|B(RbCFWkZIgNPjtuM?fnWH%`31(q=p{yPl;8Yx`NO@4Pcup9q_yi; zySIT=XPm$KsP(JXx;F%lE}p)V@APFM@1D24>*x<|UwFF|clFxL-!mgp{@I(>p1E<& zy0t4eU2wsw^=npdm_Fu7`$sB}*8qP1N1J#2M*W9gHx@ez_+A|6<5HjJpQMQ^P3QQo z>HO}KqR;U;Y`CRqcgp8?nevxT{U`PEdq-N1gZ@{%VmfaV{sh+X8%hqp+oR+-{BDk> z7qI`M=yUvC0$YEH6VB_1@ym=IEU(kBdyez!6!_^6en+P0r_br%#}Ot*_>z{(Syu`SqN9FDChBe|z$~CzMBfJ2HKbpqR;8y0jD4Md_ZKmhF_1l z$@8E^7eBHbae#cvq1}vwu`18@CnhfU#{uOKDUb8{H2CQkeg~zb==@%Yk~8_v2lb|$ z2F}N5ety5frn`RF%y|!y_FS@hz4xtnk?V~oxF0%iF?Jrf;+E51^`TSmM!j=M(7B%{ zbn!Fm3&SkRQ4ZH93Vyo7?+er{y2xigAnJM;51Jm9UTlBpSo+Ag6vzAg>59KU@V$3U z=lkS}KG*-I8Hcq$8LvdzQTNw3$LHXdpYHJe^1h<;{cg%bdraQr)^Rq#{w&8E^4GA> ztL5;$T}|(W@H==9M33)$pHunEseoV0cc7=H^Zhza=lgG(&iBbQo$pK8bcsv$BjQty zE8ZvaZ}Z1b3+M1^ir&WgCA)r!L%z49{lxc^bbGc!+JW!mX!(3EM$-!+{^op3^Yc9t zW!GH!hW)+gNBh1XrsF)Dk~8_;Yfb05FYOO0^7hIa0qlT&#eG6nE&O0 zC190^d0PY62KInMU=#C&9PYnGU7(5j)5`UKa#)< zunFt{`@j(}it#Z4OapVkBCrB<-eL5Q15>~(umCIrYrrP31MCAwz$p4<0+7(2H_wE0D@3$np<$hiTJ^hyHbFkFM#bM%(=nrSCI`h1XR;@ql z6|2u)ec_QCH?9X=z^<zp0;S@{317j;pWuXAC>y zSNX=N&~p_V+>Lp6$z=7~4ela}80}u-mpc4AfSmWa8J5Hj zyANJ~eBKAzNIw9@`>K8^=lwnq=u9WCnfh7$lHXwT(e`s6h?qq=ZT~F0XXT4t;+Hz& zhkkkalH}VYPcHF`&KJ7p7wAR5^pK`sMo3exloP*1ubuiq(itl)e&Kwc_DeZe#=P?? zjEi1KTofRe_0K}7NBogp?vIm?zy0!0NuFHd51lV`@kbf;(H{e(=?~{U#%}5%<;4Ct z=uGFVw9EVW4wB(sM8<=*d$IN|mS1!b{}fYx|NQFP-@H)raZ7;uT-IKC4ZFQs>y`vL1A)>QqZ|NlZ!Rs5MzAt zc0iVPh(C3{>NV9$^C-$d7 zXS!si#UI=^(f3i#ABgP#Vg9J8`l$y|>KFS{>U$Es7k=#;$&*X$*ZD&C`YYs5?0>(q zA8ETj&wkKFj-*RgTI}b!8m>nRpDW{W`hz&repSD%huB@l^E~O>{_43^sY@=gTjvYi zvm0`0_ZVr8`|<08`#}nHkt22&t+d$3`yr9zly2X}#`$9TML+S+NPYKaR2_a_^5hc# z=zO7zf2y#H{)ykPdQa@HEBle2XFup7NBmK>(qg}NAj!=mhT0zz_q7nZ)F<{v)prvAUivMM zGJEZ<^QD|;FZ86n(GU3TO(L!B&44a)#NM)%mT`dlK$Z?>h?hAEQFY70Y zJh6L>=Tg#t^WIHd((>%q`BF~oZb3fnc5d|Boj{s$rJUHA2A%1Wm3DdOJr}T@Y2Pfn zX5~x0Vs`@1*VOM#yInPza!UW!`BF~ou0dbgJw|#m{(aE+fpVps*qs8M>7tdE_U1Wn zwyW@oKbR)6y|Y#SJfN!TW&K2vCw7n2`=^h-<+{5hPcCmNe>D=qf%d?be_AiyW~#XQjnHwlk6KP5WlqH7j50_4>E^K3n~at=}bi za(Vq*aa7*yY3@+#e;fz02?R_wS-5 z&$I72{&;@Px4(40)Ge21pUM}y7tfGG``Sp;zCO~no?_3)s$bH{#?)T1kMBX~{Rz%v ziDC9-AcLI|22HU476+j-+EBnc6As#q+X6 z#xL7T+o97USL~`k&2QJi+iw3y$&*X$()mJ{_Dew@+EqrHcGZ!#{U~;{EITAUw9?Xk zJTJj^lKO(|W&6dh^v7rPX8(9#*YCya%l-B?9{bjBr4G5gcvbmA7kd+sOM8n*)84A8 zSIUWf4bYkHTWPV2&yhs7Bkc;aCyXxjh@DyW-L%idpL?a`$t8B`e4&e-W9UaabGI0O z(#{gnwqM20D(E6d(j6=9wJY8;;d6uViTxaZiEP)VYFE}bQ1z1@hEk9CBe%D|-49>- z%o`+6F7b!X7rN&U)JK05ZuR@4f;8)wa$&eV1<*51YPi+tZFW2UV~xQo-|98PCIYJQvpSyi~>WLk08aGUk&d%&&@=ZxnF9&Ex))#`v7T z_%#L&(SLe~n*rPXcH%Sq#-&Ud#I zk6W{0`a-GOev|#O=toUGhg3KH`H7F7c&8K>fAT$8VstmtANYI0JolT&`^r40n_6o4 za`+x~d~2k!e#vu@4u0>fy~55i(o@>iuzmVs+DhC_>7}mddj%)Z*Lm%L~WHqdV zq#(DuoykvNU$Ou>JipO;iOCoH#ornDr2rJV_^t6`^WF3k_8WKo=9>!Z9(lg^UX!#3 z&#V)9)_wW9wHv&*h}{<9Npg`_ZW{mBfrImY_}gRlUvrAow~)M*rB&-UtX?i}y_~pK znB7a{bs=X6eA%@>IOy4}*Lk;nH-9evF;kx_+q>SlXS;G-;-Lp5A?4G^=X+Vh6JLMw z&+quiBtMUQ+Q0kC{SNy0A0PJK`w)G3-kr#E?;C7={jX7b^_C&G4&3rLH=lUulYg4T zBlRWnJg(@SlpZ=2V@{aqf9 z$f4at-X~YP`W(68==0Z1q#1c*$cf)!{Bi2x+r90y>t6axsn3-+@Arq;@7dqkFWC>- zpQOC_Eep9tpwPt*?$>8eHT&|7bbr-WCmr+y$rn4gUPk16=bZIx)}Cd(GeLPB$R7Y3 zkvo3ynRmQ(f6CiY{%|j%`^t)Uz1|ae`dRDNZaj0<`qgg)*#ptj)y2C~pD_Npp!mse zym{$O|0P5>e`yhP@||_YE{~cLUjDM?tIY3^R>61MD^mL}$rui|{IWLQ|6+dXn}_U4 zS(4vHIlia$*XR8DuDQgt{1EwkPiy1V7hkf(%5Ne+`bnezcV8J>w=`qQyX_N6g3dZ6 z$GyMK@w^1n{GJ5UJU1a}ky8nfBlHsJH6Zy5NH;CI+}C;j!PF!FPp_PN8iVr&o_}C` zWFe;m>;s2D+dfKk>svBLzR;xp?5C#Vg7`mwvU!h*?Q>N7$nKJYaGUl`{KUKu#r!qt z&I;Bg<*Sf4xWL?Bw%qlx3+6IX8u5Yr_*#?yzBgn_OEO-zxcXM=MSIwRddO}tJ3p- z?=7ZX*uEeB_ucQKuf+dF$SdA#`0hF8yzk9*rsb>1&wRw>H@~&lJxi?oCh~j#Zt`D$ z;-|JaEkS@}ccm)>v6KlH)Wc3W8a(a#ur`^evP;g2d?TKP%jC$2T+ z|GLGEzl~b?S>*FQ)hD)$ZNHV3Uqn9R`;$9g_CH%&`BmgIzW3kjJ6msKy=tNNm!^~d+%4s#x#@q5$v zZ(P5mAljJmCwY@;cjlkF>&3sJuOz;+kjM7TzNoQwE+eH)`6BY!zQs#U_{oxtm+eUT zD)QOBpFHfL%k1&1iF~&2C)!`W#~#0u$nOF#TfNsK_V_gfojOa+(!QJzGHuTnr5#hB zn;#cKPk^2QN_nBPee)Jw+Lz}HgwJkYo-5$^6-BucunL^jzI9dK&`OJc(>;It{_`CV zKW_VfbdJA$Z+PLee@0(P`Q+z~AJ{%$ee%g&?D<6&`D~wOU-8ao+VhJj@{7QoPk7!t z*}mepD(I|J{3Pwe^AeI4zD@w2-5x#Ulb`J|wCK_vJog}czV>*(v6J(KCd+-n(Br^a z?U4kZ$d~%cR$Ba7Z|>*4|HA%s_k(BNy2O1STQ12TKI)$@WOx4I{q&9Gw;_-IzUJQN zylD=TRZl+h`@rk3f9Z;)kT3okgHD-JulSqiGbAm1sk>&xKk~^>f9EZ_XFtwk2%qh5 zp0D73P#on-z$$Q-zw4^Lp_O)R4E-L2H?0??+{^XbWF8-F8@nIg@aKC!|N9j`lYEiG z=OrSao6cFkZqwScPA{$6D4gaJc`3-r0Uum`!-~^xT;386*S}5$^bEc`2YRFdy4^mm zysg`ycW*b(Lr32JroWR%+I@`k%RTU&ckIJIoipl)eUtL7v>6YcR^NK1U4Ddeu`e3? zZ~N3Smo1r=UzP&B_H7ftr`FH?q8(Q`gSqq@{(7NE~SmO-?J#U^2Bf79OU=GvV(PojJVILq%jRbRtO+kWp*PH-Nef@>s|)vs1oBbd{Vqjtf8ahd>l;%ql+OWYwM#+O*Rs;$ciLUQ%;?cS z>%ouk`%hv|5B$`Fc60xlc1QnXVY}nVr`_C#mb4v@+;?W%jZl9I<+H$9cIQ=nO)G7W z1L?Dk-5(h4o}!I*Ja$p;fOShdLGjrB#R1;D>*vFpZnet~Q7+mse);tCcRh_ZiTot! z#Y0RyJJqNCdTBzuVd5x@e99EMjK3x9Q;@F`z-NyGHRPkblfb^Qq;0rIFeC-#0 zUsm`$KVcu2<(dKIL|z^AHjwBuLcgd>X^_LUF zx^BgyyLxSoiNfwh={3;+3w z;!(mN-(O{4;dh4^m!uOlKj$aBpOKG9e&*+Ku7vqT=u-!hpZOKMk2p&o=JUJCeEu6l zF6B`^pV#|0n(=`7UGOKrIqgTbf3kQllKdJepY-bSX1t?*q!Y={e6CkfKk~JeKD3YD zYhw8-_=bvqB4_u->66>i&!7F4@eAcqf5u-U;pdNozYHWl*Tc9zKzs7gyQ%nDAHT!H zeos1)@|o^p|C#@C!I+BsqYBqRGB7U{@cO*C9{K(PkqQwq7Z-tn$qf5sQT7sU8%gFmbI886jSj6RfK1%Fxb?hxEc8etStLYWbZ5 zg4?UEceyv=Z~4zNPfy|;(Q7DlK*M^k_VEX`40H$ zU($)1pWjbnzDDv>pGwT{&o=ZJhUin@`Kh%R{mthN))&9m*qa4XAAX0Rhxt9@y9zzZ zil6U$7Jp#$;W?5q+O?_pPnU|^tMn_w&-$X^?<;=#Eq<0+uhI8Y=8H`G{@ysr$Y*~i zACdg@2fsf@d(-zB{}h4bXZb$jjrx;L)chmNA6Osxh~#H}0`K=S-n!6Z9HI}uLq&ed zB~tz*9&R-LVf!WTNBjfHPy6_NK>DW+J*tYI_3`^xv;0r~!p>%Vo7KMbPh(%BKhF;i zp-23?#t!OF`J;PG{4lLi^E<~G`8=l=#!r3teJ$Esh8|6&5AW{emwHJX+2aq-U(jFVBa)x?)t?uv&oD%P zp7-I)WRy#!e6|nwSJ{8#4;a5>f#hd==G1#bZRk-}{G9(+@ZHLlBFMe+;BPAaBTcqb zc+mKh<4+px)mQwqCx!K!r|M4!=LR{Sqnz~jgX4kgL$l;lPG_TuXSN^dL@`t1f%5wQ zX6z+@9eQ+?K8#;}M~~%;;2SG`);GZO2-6y=59@Co>(__;`5y%Phrb_0eaKIwe5PBU z4wlb+&Cl=LQ9tq#$5t%eTRwRs4(>zDGs*Rq&S;KjXKC z{XVu|68ufYPkH?AF#9LzMA}P#q;O7}`bQr$c4~g68;=K%C(PIK`8__?R}7I)fATv- z>qL-yrNLhZ3e6r52RLWW`ZbcD^=Gl3!}K^rAIjl(0Lf1}QOh6gX#BI6WVjdk^8Xba zKRjPY|0ls$Rs5VU@OOF1--Z5d#m{>A{lTZIfAnw@&nzE*XyJI^cL2$+QG8&xSLW$P z{;c?{`Vn2cY)zwj&v0Fp{nA44Ea27%=n4od7*9bM*`0A53PJz zH_u`nH~!5igDk?t${ z2>uxP>67mQ==d2vFED;4=Rp*IB=^db;(5lJ9j@zb3?)*rO|7WkBW$9YAt zo`t;(UHg9=EGIGmJ@)fy``Y&!1dqR1D1&P%v&nT6aAuoWVo`+l?HnezzlTecAg1IUd%;_okfj^Vy;9r0g6xs1i{ z-5>BfHMak!yZsQC{m)0==Q+7enR;O^nxC{xC#-k8*$Mv)9R-8mvG4Z?}{9CyVl0 z{}kv2OTHc7+}AE6pK(oOf9_*FPTSQ9sh9fnL+a)4@r)Lz*X~!`kB)=C28{mq)Nj*x z{mWz?!g0E2@ktzWoYr)X(~2HxqP+HR4fKv*ex!_a-=f=o=l&H={%>V=#dfh(0=TL z9{u&y9*OG?=m|w{f}U3N8t6GiFN0q6(n~0L`_$SGMewOOaq`&L(EN4q z>-%00K6R72<_70Yx`E79fCPB{wMZO)MJpWQc zKHHT@eM;K|*6Z{`o@;s``m{kGTKY`ySJ4dXV|>Sd=WEwU5^1~rYF=YdL)OTMg<&;381uWF%xw&BmR#V_r8^}e#w^yH*nD_BqJ zTYS<^L!?#vP5P0Jg8|kPR2)q1gNh!>{xNtQNP%7eieE&ZIMQW5-6`X{GKHY=vhDA8DJmNj(@pto#b7Ao!qygc%PxB%EvJO)AUx-*suH* z>7l$D7b0!Yhkp5y2Gf7_+g}Df?x#D{)3(QpgOGVD^;Gc@DMPN-vjBR{UvDIfbkm}X zAMd|Uu76DYIKVn$-{KSfTCWX`7w7Tdcp0L69QlZg$vjQl&v}|^kI6hu(Ie%MdJCY} z{Pjk%NH;CIJzny>X$ScnXNc6F{YL2@iT*9v4_v2DAYbIz_41r(8u_e`NPdpfJhz&H zo_%00L_W`zavn&zM9Swl%5$zAv|j~sTb6u@2ku8IKRBE}+Vtu3!xkB-Ps($DHZ%73 zn;gMi5FQ$>$-QC`>E0)3$5b6nEnXKeHQII!EB=U$WG zV>=M(pFzldzZ4+f?w@*`<2tnNKkZ;Skp}2Jpy*@k&vUXv*qXIJFCCZ9-gaRXr3nevw!kjZ4-KQfFnzP z;phGi&neeoZvlLXC;a~5IZd9+PN9De&@Xcqzw4g}pPMp#K6M*L=zMN!`S~aBcPf8Q z<{O&M`G%rLV*i*Q|5EQ5^(B!naU%2q=ovrV;ku1}p6B|idTyW0+Z8?12+^ksdfQ)b zq=axkCSzqn#Cvn zZ3O5i{5*%D?3tXy&~%=|Q1poN903ZK)Pem?e^n2@ILa{ZbY$5_&MJ3+;vv*k3!`0Tr}6sDVIq393Ocu zx(z=j{$>211CpQXKs@(8L_8Nzu43^^JaB(P`*Q$3bzgKiFID_bHu$_tB>aBv__SYLJA>Fg+c0BN$`4IVRCnEjNc;Gqh zJmp1 zMLnlDBRrRBI@e|N{3$mV94Beei$LfZNg!RZ=(c}&ZoH0s`h`e)J9uA6`+tCPoWHPr zS)S+K#|y|8eK7V>jhb<_CE1nCCw_@P9_}?ct2_Kys4i<<4cX5DWK>q@;T48<6P)mM=MzTcKh<& zdl~s`7b4_4T({Eg+d(C+4~OI{4@pBK0W*$NyygRL99USkK4+^w<{ucxHV(C!a(<=|s`T_9xFp7a_L= z%vkazo_TIZw{HV{cKZrH*E1CV)3%M79^t=W6|VK3CIuK3CBr9n_=GWi>(XTY5@=tRX$J=(hfRk02T~excq(-M)OU zp$)$jAUA>XjFeuk`adf44)^`Fy45k)0wo|*M-0rA{ zSjF#tjP^0V|B*Vt;Na^9hu<{VzsF!=FY`N7$(I;xzSLm(NQ1o#4JIx(n8)vlRNrCJ zt*Z f ∈ facets) facets := by + exact ⟨hne, fun _ h => h, fun f hf => + ⟨(checked f hf).1, canonicalArticulated f (checked f hf).2, + canonicalFacetArticulated f, (checked f hf).2⟩⟩ + +theorem canonicalGroundsForSingleton {W : Type} (f : Facet W) (checked : FacetDischarged f) : + Grounds f.claim canonicalArticulation (fun g => g = f) [f] := by + refine ⟨by simp, (by intro g hg; cases hg; simp), ?_⟩ + intro g hg + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hg + subst g + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated f checked, canonicalFacetArticulated f, checked⟩ + +/- A mode selects whether a system applies or waives the modeled governance rule. -/ +inductive Mode | apply | waive + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- The four hypotheses vary algorithm and governance independently for the same assessed system. -/ +abbrev World := Candidate × Mode + +def actual : World := (.identity, .apply) + +/- A method's form and its possible executable realizations belong to one object. -/ +structure Method where + form : Form + realize : World → Implementation + +/- System fields identify the owner, its method, its current principle form, policy and work. -/ +structure System where + owner : Nat + method : Method + principleForm : Form + governance : World → Mode + requirements : Requirements + +def policyFor : Mode → Policy + | .apply => openPolicy + | .waive => neutralPolicy + +def workFor (owner : Nat) : Mode → List WorkRecord + | .apply => completeOwnWork owner + | .waive => [] + +def System.policy (s : System) (w : World) : Policy := policyFor (s.governance w) +def System.rules (s : System) (_w : World) : List Principle := ownRules s.owner +def System.work (s : System) (w : World) : List WorkRecord := workFor s.owner (s.governance w) + +def actualSystem : System where + owner := 0 + method := ⟨⟨.method, 0⟩, fun w => implementation w.1⟩ + principleForm := ⟨.principle, 0⟩ + governance := Prod.snd + requirements := identityRequirements + +def systemCapability (s : System) : Claim World := + fun w => ∀ n, s.requirements.inputs n → (s.method.realize w).run n = s.requirements.expected n + +def systemBudget (s : System) : Claim World := + fun w => (s.method.realize w).cost ≤ s.requirements.budget + +def systemObservation (s : System) : Record World := + ⟨fun w => decide ((s.method.realize w).run 0 = s.requirements.expected 0), true⟩ + +def systemHeld (s : System) : Theory World := + union (singleton (systemCapability s)) (singleton (systemBudget s)) + +inductive Question | correctOutput | affordable + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def systemContext (s : System) : Context World Question := + ⟨singleton (Compatible [systemObservation s]), + (fun q => match q with | .correctOutput => systemCapability s | .affordable => systemBudget s), + fun w => (s.method.realize w).domain 0 ∧ w.2 = .apply⟩ + +abbrev capability := systemCapability actualSystem +abbrev observation := systemObservation actualSystem +abbrev held := systemHeld actualSystem +abbrev context := systemContext actualSystem + +/- The output observation identifies the algorithm, without identifying its independently varied governance mode. -/ +theorem observationIdentifies (w : World) : Compatible [observation] w ↔ w.1 = .identity := by + rcases w with ⟨candidate, mode⟩ + cases candidate <;> simp [Compatible, observation, systemObservation, actualSystem, + implementation, identityRequirements, identityImpl, successorImpl] + +theorem capabilityActual : capability actual := fun _ _ => rfl + +theorem observedCapability : Supports [observation] capability := by + intro w hw + have hid := (observationIdentifies w).1 hw + rcases w with ⟨candidate, mode⟩ + change candidate = .identity at hid + subst candidate + exact fun _ _ => rfl + +def capabilityFacet : Facet World := .empirical [observation] (fun _ => True) capability (fun _ => True) + +theorem capabilityFacetChecked : FacetDischarged capabilityFacet := by + exact ⟨⟨actual, (observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl, trivial⟩, + (fun w hw _ => observedCapability w hw), fun _ _ => trivial⟩ + +theorem capabilityGrounds : Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet] := + canonicalGroundsForSingleton capabilityFacet capabilityFacetChecked + +theorem actualAdmissible : Admissible held context actual := by + refine ⟨(modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 capabilityActual, + (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by change 1 ≤ 1; decide)⟩, + (modelsSingleton _ _).2 ((observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl), trivial, rfl⟩ + +theorem jointConsistent : Consistent held context := + consequenceConsistency held context ⟨actual, actualAdmissible⟩ + +/- The current method/principle forms, judgments, rules and own work are read from this very system and world. -/ +def Charter (s : System) (w : World) : Prop := + Generative (s.policy w) ∧ Consistent (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) ∧ + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (s.policy w).current s.method.form ∧ (s.policy w).current s.principleForm + +theorem charterChecked : Charter actualSystem actual := + ⟨⟨Or.inl rfl, fun _ _ => trivial⟩, jointConsistent, completeOwnWork_reflexive 0, rfl, rfl⟩ + +/- Revision adds a supported input-specific assertion about the same system's realized method. -/ +def revisedHeld : Theory World := union held + (singleton (fun w => (actualSystem.method.realize w).run 0 = actualSystem.requirements.expected 0)) + +def initialSnapshot : Snapshot World Question := ⟨held, context, 0⟩ +def revisedSnapshot : Snapshot World Question := ⟨revisedHeld, context, 1⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem revisionKeepsConsistency : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ Consistent revisedHeld context ∧ + TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot true ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot false := by + refine ⟨charterChecked, consequenceConsistency revisedHeld context ⟨actual, + (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨actualAdmissible.1, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + actualAdmissible.2⟩, (fun _ => rfl), ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h (Or.inr (by decide)) + cases bad + +/- A claim about this system's method is assessed as its owner's system claim. -/ +def OwnCapabilityDuty (s : System) (w : World) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + Performed (s.work w) (.system s.owner) .assessment ∧ + Grounds (systemCapability s) canonicalArticulation (fun f => f ∈ facets) facets + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem ownCapabilityGrounded : + OwnCapabilityDuty actualSystem actual [capabilityFacet] ∧ capability actual := by + refine ⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, capabilityActual⟩ + · exact ownAssessmentPerformed 0 (.system 0) (by simp [ownSubjects]) + · exact canonicalGrounds capability [capabilityFacet] (by simp) + (by intro f hf; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hf; cases hf; exact ⟨rfl, capabilityFacetChecked⟩) + +/- This cost observation is true of both algorithms but does not discriminate their output behavior. -/ +def costAllowanceRecord : Record World := + ⟨fun w => decide ((actualSystem.method.realize w).cost ≤ 2), true⟩ + +def unsupportedCapabilityFacet : Facet World := + .empirical [costAllowanceRecord] (fun _ => True) capability (fun _ => True) + +theorem costCompatibleWithFailure : Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] (.successor, .apply) := by + intro r hr + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst r + rfl + +theorem costDoesNotSupportOutput : ¬ Supports [costAllowanceRecord] capability := by + intro h + have bad := h (.successor, .apply) costCompatibleWithFailure 0 trivial + cases bad + +theorem unsupportedGrounds : ¬ Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] := by + intro h + have discharged := (h.2.2 unsupportedCapabilityFacet (by simp)).2.2.2 + exact costDoesNotSupportOutput (fun w hw => discharged.2.1 w hw trivial) + +/- Five separately adopted requirements govern distinct operations; the mode does not give them priority over one another. -/ +inductive Commitment | generation | consistency | reflexivity | grounds | choice + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A Grounds policy governs arbitrary claims, articulations and applicable facets, rather than only one capability claim. -/ +def groundsPermission (mode : Mode) (claim : Claim World) (a : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + match mode with + | .apply => Grounds claim a applicable facets + | .waive => True + +def GroundsProvision (mode : Mode) : Prop := + ∀ claim a applicable facets, groundsPermission mode claim a applicable facets → + Grounds claim a applicable facets + +theorem groundsProvisionMeaning (mode : Mode) : GroundsProvision mode ↔ mode = .apply := by + cases mode with + | apply => exact ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ _ _ _ _ h => h⟩ + | waive => + constructor + · intro h + exact False.elim (unsupportedGrounds (h capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] trivial)) + · intro h; cases h + +/- The consistency policy checks a whole same-context theory, not isolated judgments. -/ +def consistencyPermission (mode : Mode) (t : Theory World) (c : Context World Question) : Prop := + match mode with | .apply => Consistent t c | .waive => True + +def conflictingHeld : Theory World := union (singleton capability) (singleton (fun w => ¬ capability w)) + +theorem conflictConsequences : + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput true ∧ + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput false := by + exact ⟨fun w hw => hw.1 capability (Or.inl rfl), + fun w hw => hw.1 (fun w => ¬ capability w) (Or.inr rfl)⟩ + +theorem conflictingHeldInconsistent : ¬ Consistent conflictingHeld context := + conflictRequiresChange conflictingHeld context .correctOutput conflictConsequences.1 conflictConsequences.2 + +/- The selection policy applies the actual output/budget and relevant-reason conditions to every implementation. -/ +def choicePermission (mode : Mode) (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Prop := + match mode with | .apply => JustifiedChoice req i reasons | .waive => True + +/- The following consequences are computed from distinct rule applications; they are not interchangeable support flags. -/ +def proposedOperation : Mode → Operation + | .apply => .successor + | .waive => .copy + +def selfSamples : Mode → List Nat + | .apply => [0, 1] + | .waive => [1] + +noncomputable def conflictDecision (mode : Mode) : Bool := + @decide (consistencyPermission mode conflictingHeld context) (Classical.propDecidable _) + +noncomputable def groundsDecision (mode : Mode) (facet : Facet World) : Bool := + @decide (groundsPermission mode facet.claim canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = facet) [facet]) + (Classical.propDecidable _) + +noncomputable def choiceDecision (mode : Mode) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Bool := + @decide (choicePermission mode identityRequirements i reasons) (Classical.propDecidable _) + +theorem decisionsApply : conflictDecision .apply = false ∧ + groundsDecision .apply unsupportedCapabilityFacet = false ∧ + groundsDecision .apply capabilityFacet = true ∧ + choiceDecision .apply cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = false ∧ + choiceDecision .apply identityImpl objectiveReason = true := by + classical + simp only [conflictDecision, groundsDecision, choiceDecision, consistencyPermission, + groundsPermission, choicePermission] + exact ⟨decide_eq_false conflictingHeldInconsistent, + decide_eq_false unsupportedGrounds, decide_eq_true capabilityGrounds, + decide_eq_false eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient.2, decide_eq_true identityJustified⟩ + +theorem decisionsWaive : conflictDecision .waive = true ∧ + groundsDecision .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet = true ∧ + choiceDecision .waive cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = true := by + exact ⟨@decide_eq_true (consistencyPermission .waive conflictingHeld context) + (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial, + @decide_eq_true (groundsPermission .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet.claim canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet]) (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial, + @decide_eq_true (choicePermission .waive identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity]) + (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial⟩ + +/- Each application supplies its own outcome type, adopted objective, constraints and actual option-indexed reasons. -/ +noncomputable def commitmentPositionFor (c : Commitment) (chosenMode : Mode) : ValuePosition World := + match c with + | .generation => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Operation, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => proposedOperation mode, + objective := fun op => op.run 0 ≠ Operation.copy.run 0, + constraints := fun _ mode => Generative (policyFor mode), + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ mode => (proposedOperation mode).run 0 = 1 ∧ Operation.copy.run 0 = 0], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => ¬ Expanded baseState inflatedState, + response := fun _ => some "Pursuing expansion does not guarantee it; assess the actual before and after capabilities separately" } + | .consistency => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => conflictDecision mode, + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => consistencyPermission mode held context, + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput true ∧ + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput false], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => ¬ Entails (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) (fun w => w = true), + response := fun _ => some "Consistency alone does not establish sufficient support; assess the claim with its grounds as well" } + | .reflexivity => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := List Nat, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => selfSamples mode, + objective := fun samples => ∃ n ∈ samples, ownArithmeticPrinciple n = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => Reflexive 0 (ownRules 0) (workFor 0 mode), + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 1 = true], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => selfTest [1] = true ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false, + response := fun _ => some "A passing self-test does not certify the principle; retain the relevant counterexample and its scope" } + | .grounds => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => groundsDecision mode unsupportedCapabilityFacet, + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => groundsPermission mode capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet], + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] (.successor, .apply) ∧ + ¬ capability (.successor, .apply)], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess, + response := fun _ => some "Grounds allows an external output assessment without requiring this process to provide an internal explanation" } + | .choice => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => choiceDecision mode cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity], + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => choicePermission mode identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason, + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => cheapSuccessor.run 0 = 1 ∧ identityRequirements.expected 0 = 0 ∧ + cheapSuccessor.cost ≤ identityRequirements.budget], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ identityImpl.established = true, + response := fun _ => some "An existing conventional method remains eligible when actual output and budget reasons justify it" } + +noncomputable def commitmentPosition (c : Commitment) : ValuePosition World := commitmentPositionFor c .apply + +/- The fact used as a reason has content before evaluating the adopted rule's consequence. -/ +theorem positionReasons (c : Commitment) : + ∀ r ∈ (commitmentPosition c).reasons, r actual (commitmentPosition c).adopted := by + cases c <;> intro r hr <;> dsimp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor] at hr ⊢ <;> + rcases List.mem_singleton.mp hr with rfl + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact conflictConsequences + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · refine ⟨costCompatibleWithFailure, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 0 trivial + cases bad + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl, by decide⟩ + +/- Each adopted rule has its stated consequence in this explicitly defined application; this is not ultimate value justification. -/ +theorem positionConsequence (c : Commitment) (w : World) : (commitmentPosition c).consequence w := by + cases c <;> dsimp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor, ValuePosition.consequence] + · exact ⟨by decide, ⟨Or.inl rfl, fun _ _ => trivial⟩⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.1, jointConsistent⟩ + · exact ⟨⟨0, by simp [selfSamples], rfl⟩, completeOwnWork_reflexive 0⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.2.1, capabilityGrounds⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.2.2.2.1, identityJustified⟩ + +theorem positionProcedure (c : Commitment) : ValueProcedure (commitmentPosition c) := by + refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · cases c <;> simp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor] + · refine ⟨actual, ?_, ?_, ?_, positionReasons c⟩ + · cases c <;> exact (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl + · cases c <;> rfl + · cases c <;> rfl + · intro w _ _ _ + exact positionConsequence c w + · intro w _ _ + cases c <;> exact ⟨_, rfl, by decide⟩ + +/- Criticism is instantiated within the adopted position's actual limit rather than made vacuous. -/ +theorem criticismWithinScope (c : Commitment) : + (commitmentPosition c).limits actual ∧ (commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism actual := by + constructor + · cases c <;> rfl + · cases c + · simp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + · exact consistentIncomplete.2.1 + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact ⟨outputNotExplanation.1, outputNotExplanation.2.1⟩ + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + +/- Waiving the rule changes the actual computed outcome or an explicit adopted constraint; old reasons cannot certify it unchanged. -/ +theorem oppositeConsequenceFails (c : Commitment) (w : World) : + ¬ (commitmentPositionFor c .waive).consequence w := by + cases c <;> intro h + · exact permissionNotValuation.2.2 h.2 + · have bad : conflictDecision .waive = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.1] at bad + cases bad + · obtain ⟨n, hn, hf⟩ := h.1 + change n ∈ [1] at hn + have he : n = 1 := List.mem_singleton.mp hn + subst n + cases hf + · have bad : groundsDecision .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.2.1] at bad + cases bad + · have bad : choiceDecision .waive cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.2.2] at bad + cases bad + +theorem oppositeProcedureRejected (c : Commitment) : ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor c .waive) := by + intro h + obtain ⟨w, hs, hl, _, hr⟩ := h.2.1 + exact oppositeConsequenceFails c w (h.2.2.1 w hs hl hr) + +/- Each statement names adoption of a particular rule; its defined policy gives that option its meaning. -/ +noncomputable def commitmentClaim (c : Commitment) : Claim World := (commitmentPosition c).commitment + +noncomputable def commitmentFacet (c : Commitment) : Facet World := .value (commitmentPosition c) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem reasonsBelongToCommitments (c : Commitment) : + Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c] ∧ + JointAdoption (commitmentPosition c) ∧ + (commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor c .waive) := by + exact ⟨canonicalGroundsForSingleton (commitmentFacet c) (positionProcedure c), + (positionProcedure c).2.1, (criticismWithinScope c).2, oppositeProcedureRejected c⟩ + +/- This claim concerns the Grounds rule for arbitrary claim/facet packages, not a single capability duty. -/ +theorem groundsCommitmentIsProvision : commitmentClaim .grounds = (fun w => GroundsProvision w.2) := by + funext w + apply propext + exact (groundsProvisionMeaning w.2).symm + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem groundsSelfAssessment : + Grounds (fun w => GroundsProvision w.2) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet .grounds) [commitmentFacet .grounds] ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).limits actual ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor .grounds .waive) := by + rw [← groundsCommitmentIsProvision] + exact ⟨(reasonsBelongToCommitments .grounds).1, + (criticismWithinScope .grounds).1, (criticismWithinScope .grounds).2, + oppositeProcedureRejected .grounds⟩ + +/- This existing principle form implements the same system's choice rule on two actual proposals. +Input 0 names the identity proposal; input 1 names the cheap successor proposal. -/ +structure PhilosophyMethod where + form : Form + mode : Mode + +def currentPhilosophy (s : System) (w : World) : PhilosophyMethod := + ⟨s.principleForm, s.governance w⟩ + +noncomputable def PhilosophyMethod.review (p : PhilosophyMethod) (input : Nat) : Nat := + if input = 0 then + if choiceDecision p.mode identityImpl objectiveReason then 1 else 0 + else if choiceDecision p.mode cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] then 1 else 0 + +noncomputable def PhilosophyMethod.implementation (p : PhilosophyMethod) : Implementation where + name := "Current philosophy's proposal review" + conventional := true + established := true + run := p.review + cost := 1 + domain n := n = 0 ∨ n = 1 + explanation := p.review + trace n := [n, p.review n] + +def proposalRequirements : Requirements where + inputs n := n = 0 ∨ n = 1 + expected n := if n = 0 then 1 else 0 + budget := 1 + values _ := True + +theorem currentReviewCorrect : ∀ n, proposalRequirements.inputs n → + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review n = proposalRequirements.expected n := by + intro n hn + rcases hn with rfl | rfl <;> + simp [PhilosophyMethod.review, currentPhilosophy, actualSystem, actual, + proposalRequirements, decisionsApply.2.2.2.1, decisionsApply.2.2.2.2] + +/- Status alone fails for this actual principle method; its demonstrated proposal decisions give a relevant reason. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged : + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).form = actualSystem.principleForm ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).mode = actualSystem.governance actual ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.status .standing] ∧ + JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.method .output] ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 0 = 1 ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 1 = 0 := by + refine ⟨rfl, rfl, statusOnlyFails _ _ _, ?_, currentReviewCorrect 0 (Or.inl rfl), + currentReviewCorrect 1 (Or.inr rfl)⟩ + exact ⟨⟨currentReviewCorrect, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, + .method .output, by simp, trivial, currentReviewCorrect⟩ + +/- Applications choose their contract and requirements; the resulting claim is about this system's actual method. -/ +def applicationClaim (s : System) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) : Claim World := + fun w => contract req (s.method.realize w) + +def ApplicationDuties (s : System) (w : World) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + Grounds (applicationClaim s req contract) articulations applicable facets + +/- These are consequences of an explicitly adopted duty, not a proof that arbitrary applications fulfill it. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem applicationRetainsDuties (s : System) (w : World) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) + (h : ApplicationDuties s w req contract articulations applicable facets) : + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (∀ f, applicable f → f ∈ facets) ∧ + (∀ f ∈ facets, f.claim = applicationClaim s req contract ∧ + Articulated (articulations f) ∧ FacetArticulated (articulations f) f ∧ FacetDischarged f) := + ⟨h.1, h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2⟩ + +def outputContract (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Prop := + ∀ n, req.inputs n → i.run n = req.expected n + +def successorRequirements : Requirements := + { identityRequirements with expected := fun n => n + 1 } + +/- Holding the system and observation fixed while changing the actual objective changes the capability claim. -/ +def changedObjectiveFacet : Facet World := + .empirical [observation] (fun _ => True) + (applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract) (fun _ => True) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem applicationVariation : + ApplicationDuties actualSystem actual identityRequirements outputContract + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet] ∧ + ¬ applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds (applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract) + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = changedObjectiveFacet) [changedObjectiveFacet] := by + refine ⟨⟨completeOwnWork_reflexive 0, capabilityGrounds⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h 0 trivial + cases bad + · intro h + have discharged := (h.2.2 changedObjectiveFacet (by simp)).2.2.2 + have bad := discharged.2.1 actual ((observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl) trivial 0 trivial + cases bad + +/- The very system satisfies the charter while its true cost evidence fails to establish its output capability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem charterNotGrounds : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ + Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] := by + exact ⟨charterChecked, (by intro r hr; cases List.mem_singleton.mp hr; rfl), unsupportedGrounds⟩ + +/- A single inhabited system/context carries the charter, its own actual claim and support, +contentful principle work, and separately reasoned governance commitments. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness +organon.preamble#p1 sha256 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097 +organon.preamble#p2 sha256 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097 +organon.charter.overview#p2 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.charter.overview#p3 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem jointWitness : + ∃ s : System, ∃ w : World, + Admissible (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) w ∧ Charter s w ∧ + OwnCapabilityDuty s w [capabilityFacet] ∧ systemCapability s w ∧ + JustifiedChoice s.requirements (s.method.realize w) objectiveReason ∧ + (∀ c : Commitment, Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c]) ∧ + s = actualSystem ∧ w = actual := by + exact ⟨actualSystem, actual, actualAdmissible, charterChecked, + ownCapabilityGrounded.1, capabilityActual, identityJustified, + fun c => (reasonsBelongToCommitments c).1, rfl, rfl⟩ + +end CoreReader.Integration diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c7c98b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ +namespace CoreReader.Logic + +/- A claim denotes the worlds in which its content holds. -/ +abbrev Claim (W : Type) := W → Prop +/- A theory is a collection of simultaneously held claims. -/ +abbrev Theory (W : Type) := Claim W → Prop +/- A model satisfies every member of the whole theory. -/ +def Models {W : Type} (t : Theory W) (w : W) : Prop := ∀ p, t p → p w +/- Semantic entailment quantifies over all models. -/ +def Entails {W : Type} (t : Theory W) (p : Claim W) : Prop := ∀ w, Models t w → p w +/- Satisfiability requires an actual witness. -/ +def Satisfiable {W : Type} (t : Theory W) : Prop := ∃ w, Models t w +/- Assumptions, meanings and scope are distinct components; questions remain explicit. -/ +structure Context (W Q : Type) where + assumptions : Theory W + meaning : Q → Claim W + scope : Claim W +/- Admissible worlds satisfy held claims, assumptions and scope jointly. -/ +def Admissible {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (w : W) : Prop := + Models t w ∧ Models c.assumptions w ∧ c.scope w +/- A negative judgment denies the very same question under the same meaning. -/ +def Consequence {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (q : Q) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + ∀ w, Admissible t c w → if positive then c.meaning q w else ¬ c.meaning q w +/- The consistency obligation prohibits both consequences at one comparison basis. -/ +def Consistent {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) : Prop := + ∀ q, ¬ (Consequence t c q true ∧ Consequence t c q false) +/- An inhabited joint interpretation prevents opposite semantic consequences. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency +organon.charter.consistency#p1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem consequenceConsistency {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) + (inhabited : ∃ w, Admissible t c w) : Consistent t c := by + intro q h + obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := inhabited + exact (h.2 w hw) (h.1 w hw) +/- Empty and singleton theories provide concrete semantic contexts. -/ +def emptyTheory {W : Type} : Theory W := fun _ => False +def singleton {W : Type} (p : Claim W) : Theory W := fun q => q = p +def union {W : Type} (a b : Theory W) : Theory W := fun p => a p ∨ b p +theorem modelsSingleton {W : Type} (p : Claim W) (w : W) : Models (singleton p) w ↔ p w := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h p rfl + · intro h q hq; cases hq; exact h +theorem modelsUnion {W : Type} (a b : Theory W) (w : W) : + Models (union a b) w ↔ Models a w ∧ Models b w := by + constructor + · intro h; exact ⟨fun p hp => h p (Or.inl hp), fun p hp => h p (Or.inr hp)⟩ + · rintro ⟨ha,hb⟩ p (hp|hp); exact ha p hp; exact hb p hp +/- The paired world records independent truth values for two questions. -/ +def premiseP : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.1 = true +def premiseRule : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.1 = true → w.2 = true +def premiseNotQ : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.2 ≠ true +def jointTheory : Theory (Bool × Bool) := + union (singleton premiseP) (union (singleton premiseRule) (singleton premiseNotQ)) +/- Each premise has a model, but their joint implication makes the union unsatisfiable. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict +organon.charter.consistency#p1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem jointConflict : + Satisfiable (singleton premiseP) ∧ Satisfiable (singleton premiseRule) ∧ + Satisfiable (singleton premiseNotQ) ∧ ¬ Satisfiable jointTheory := by + refine ⟨⟨(true,true), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨(false,false), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by intro h; cases h)⟩, + ⟨(false,false), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by intro h; cases h)⟩, ?_⟩ + rintro ⟨w, hw⟩ + have hp := hw premiseP (Or.inl rfl) + have hr := hw premiseRule (Or.inr (Or.inl rfl)) + have hn := hw premiseNotQ (Or.inr (Or.inr rfl)) + exact hn (hr hp) +/- A retraction replaces the old singleton, rather than retaining both at the same time. -/ +def revisionSlice (time : Nat) : Theory Bool := + singleton (fun w => w = (time == 0)) +/- The initial and revised slices have models; keeping both would create a conflict. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem revisionCanReverse : + Satisfiable (revisionSlice 0) ∧ Satisfiable (revisionSlice 1) ∧ + ¬ Satisfiable (union (revisionSlice 0) (revisionSlice 1)) := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨false, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + rintro ⟨w, hw⟩ + have hs := (modelsUnion _ _ _).1 hw + have hp := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hs.1 + have hn := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hs.2 + have bad : true = false := hp.symm.trans hn + cases bad +/- This basic question asks whether the represented switch is on. -/ +def onQuestion : Unit → Claim Bool := fun _ w => w = true +def assumptionContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨singleton (fun w => w = b), onQuestion, fun _ => True⟩ +def meaningContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨singleton (fun w => w = true), (fun _ w => w = b), fun _ => True⟩ +def scopeContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨emptyTheory, onQuestion, fun w => w = b⟩ +/- Distinct assumptions, meanings and scopes each admit opposite judgments without same-context conflict. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem contextDifferences : + (Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext false) () false) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (assumptionContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (meaningContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (scopeContext b) w) := by + have empty : ∀ w : Bool, Models emptyTheory w := by intro w p hp; cases hp + refine ⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w h; change w = true; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 h.2.1 + · intro w h hp; have hn := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h.2.1; cases hp.symm.trans hn + · intro w h; change w = true; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 h.2.1 + · intro w h hn; have hp := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h.2.1; cases hp.symm.trans hn + · intro w h; exact h.2.2 + · intro w h hp; cases hp.symm.trans h.2.2 + · intro b; exact ⟨b, empty b, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial⟩ + · intro b; exact ⟨true, empty true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial⟩ + · intro b; exact ⟨b, empty b, empty b, rfl⟩ +/- Snapshots preserve identifiable adopted-form revisions even when semantic content agrees. -/ +structure Snapshot (W Q : Type) where + held : Theory W + context : Context W Q + revisionIdentity : Nat +/- Semantic equivalence compares represented content, not its list ordering. -/ +def SameContent {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) : Prop := + (∀ p, a.held p ↔ b.held p) ∧ + (∀ p, a.context.assumptions p ↔ b.context.assumptions p) ∧ + (∀ q w, a.context.meaning q w ↔ b.context.meaning q w) ∧ + (∀ w, a.context.scope w ↔ b.context.scope w) +/- The reporting norm covers both semantic change and independently identified revisions. -/ +def TruthfulReport {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) : Prop := + (¬ SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) → reported = true +/- A real represented change and compliance entail an acknowledged change. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem semanticChangeMustBeReported {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) + (changed : ¬ SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) + (h : TruthfulReport a b reported) : reported = true := h changed +/- Reordering a two-claim presentation preserves the held theory extension. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem representationOrderIrrelevant {W : Type} (p q : Claim W) : + ∀ r, union (singleton p) (singleton q) r ↔ union (singleton q) (singleton p) r := by + intro r; exact or_comm +def contextSnapshot (c : Context Bool Unit) (revision : Nat := 0) : Snapshot Bool Unit := + ⟨emptyTheory, c, revision⟩ +/- Hiding each kind of contextual change violates the reporting interface; reporting alone supplies no truth guarantee. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem hiddenContextChangeRejected : + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (meaningContext true)) (contextSnapshot (meaningContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true)) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 0) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 1) false ∧ + (TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) true ∧ + ¬ Models (assumptionContext false).assumptions true) := by + have neq : (fun w : Bool => w = true) ≠ (fun w : Bool => w = false) := by + intro h; have k := congrFun h true; have z : true = false := k.mp rfl; cases z + refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; exact neq ((s.2.1 _).mp rfl))) + cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; have z := (s.2.2.1 () true).mp rfl; cases z)) + cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; have z := (s.2.2.2 true).mp rfl; cases z)) + cases bad + · intro h; have bad := h (Or.inr (by decide)); cases bad + · refine ⟨fun _ => rfl, ?_⟩ + intro h; have z := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h; cases z +/- Two nonidentical resource objectives can share a feasible allocation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +-/ +theorem tensionWithoutContradiction : + (∃ budget : Nat, 4 ≤ budget ∧ budget ≤ 6) ∧ + ¬ ((fun n : Nat => 4 ≤ n) = (fun n : Nat => n ≤ 6)) := by + refine ⟨⟨5, by decide, by decide⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h; have k := congrFun h 0; have bad : 4 ≤ 0 := k.mpr (by decide); cases bad +/- Conflicting conclusions cannot be retained under the same consistency obligation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +-/ +theorem conflictRequiresChange {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (q : Q) + (positive : Consequence t c q true) (negative : Consequence t c q false) : + ¬ Consistent t c := fun h => h q ⟨positive,negative⟩ +/- A satisfiable theory can have a false assumption at a specified actual world. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem consistentFalse : Satisfiable (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) ∧ + ¬ Models (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) false := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h; have bad := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h; cases bad +/- The explicitly asked on/off question is undecided by the empty but inhabited theory. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem consistentIncomplete : Satisfiable (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w ≠ true) := by + have empty : ∀ w : Bool, Models emptyTheory w := by intro w p hp; cases hp + refine ⟨⟨true, empty true⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h; have bad := h false (empty false); cases bad + · intro h; exact h true (empty true) rfl +/- A claim can share a model with a theory without following in every model. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem compatibilityNotEntailment : + Satisfiable (union emptyTheory (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true))) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨?_, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩⟩, + consistentIncomplete.2.1⟩ + intro p hp; cases hp + +end CoreReader.Logic diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.olean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.olean new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4b9cecb0f6a48af98b7137156a3ecceaeb38875 GIT binary patch literal 210448 zcma%Ed0~x-o5wDyhM!-8xm>I zH>~&CYxU~uo_&SXZyHj+@z4fg!9!jfI-+54qah<2HX0JvXjqdWBN{YpT7P)Rh(<%h z!W!#z9mn*orqg9L>g1+Eqh6=GZ-Q!4BR+SEjEKd5byl50ukpGsC-fwZ2-uo&u1ZDG z7^rDVK)X=Nt6+ORp#ATz0ZgPRkWZ%`4cGYY7X=?_5qxeJ6&=AiXf$XDd3`+5x-6V@&& zGBzyI6F#?HanO?ls(VziZ_U}8Q>f1ZeWWGud013rOhk-O*Kx?`m@s#%u#ft3pf5dT z!O8H&(@s#I8Sjnv(#-;K%YfeG5m!wEKkwwA zUdD;EIP{LurcXrVNY&i}`m8?E-|WF(RSw)ysRH#e{-o3!8KtQjF)k(|Dzf)PSN=HA zZx{5nSr*skq;pRd>SKP8GEZF5VPhg6;LDjf9ZpLJ;#kMT%QyA+D^E&cwA_g0n}GY{71V; zOUjSBAu%!I#<*g&@D&&mH>%p13cZGR^9E$t)7IV zOMR?Qq|_UuCFAI@*r-VKCx~iaD)hay@7LMuiZ|#^eVlKkte0a(F1sW z)619ru;M`KVg8Xa4`U)Gg>@e>IL75QpM#*s2HJk%2MddoDDIxVB5sTmDeDX7o!dCo zt|aK`V444&&!8uE+QoTB%K0`XYIxY_m|g{#l^15Hp&tN|pw?p&WY@2USpej$C)^Ntta)Lj;G=%XvY{`4Js9K0*|&c0(e2hK&!4 z#x2CHSk)V3mi~{NFd@6XBkE7;E$img=}61qvo`N=U+NS&ENYBP%WY4gQ1!+`Z_vP! z=d!B2@Tw3Ocp~zhbu(k*FP{}FqPs3|;SckPl=thd?z|9OQV;889{R}%$*oaq?T0G_ zF7)ueMap>;5&5=YabLn7=0T{xj6+Jeo$M9{WWU#$w?F}&(jk#EDCoWX%FXnF7!l><>$f&EzAIP+PPiJuWtU#JJHt!(36(?z>FE{?gE2_Xe%) zcOv(EMSZL%q^xJ*VWWo&9&xGhHW!z1ux!6+xL^EAZ-I+(<9dvg`Of=9r{P+vXsILk zd8vBs)SEf#`;J!{Y!y60FY}x91qjE4jnNW2VwhalcO4fK+g97R3E#sC*zKtY&|h-s zE00=cw%AYotY4%YN7jRg$QVS^D-I=O9OfVI@yK_7NI3N|k4PC;ZC``zm3mlL9MIFF zb*s82|90+Grtq8jPs%(MD~(RWAqQ zivBq+q#Pev7u~~Hz>m<9GHw%= z#I3pdZn@v7hxtaz`1I0>ZOn*>Aw!?BPfCEkdqD?%?G2uMCiDrrnOA1yL&zYXhJiDG zd;GupbKk$8Q?K&SU)=W{Hk!9@zs~+xhndH5J|l1Z)$Co*I*I;}a@^Yt*S4uK5vqFy z;uT&>#w)Aem@`wq4DhTM=pXYv?~M|BTVJ03p0_>m*w_D3cIW*T8x}+mr#$Z)Q|_&~ z=6E#0Q^#m0DecuV3F}g!NnUCm1(uff?(TB5%p3pKaWgzGPjLTt^Qrk3PCXa)g;o0V z#fySL=wY2FWxZm3?WG-dgt@g9oIk11H^|YW#{FaWlcW0+G)tpgNr6*g=y)b3sFK z-jN8J0~(6`5$A0-KF49-n+|Hhe$WY;3TnoF$O)PTngwdbx-J|v6EqO(=Wx&j&@9j( ztVeC2T)!pZa~`Mz>%BP8bkJ!ERG!N8<`I`uu4a)m%F!C`TG!rx!`4tB$a!TZ> zd!ecQpHypeU+x7h{x9;B?Rn*8o_;w0i+{ra6?)4F-4{X?FiCk=Y;*@sQ+T3VMBV&@X!6;<*I%J^1lX866hELM{aS z4$!vg?ROX;r^!6iuc7XqGh#spPs37U24^7>V5puAZMv4;}Q(Iy3+MmeIT#$XJb5E zkh6jRU{P~-qm`VJ3jImocYwx$Kl*Y&U6aL~6CNSKZ}s9&0e{EM|9&lMGyM=kR-KQI z^_A^e;1{^o_RMphHj$ofhNdTfz64d0aj1Xp^rw@~Gl5X>_30N*6(T>lPOaDdej{C|L_~gOL0=x| zqj8fj>VXUUj8H<#`O#^_2p}S!`Edw-LB^qUl=fD=K|;a2s^nh z*GIuEm8CzNzwOV?S!Pu5ILHTsFCg>d-6jR6e$KD-eSRlY{Vp&4Vb|mTQ1#n^CxVV! zSR>CD`rY#o<7R;!so)EFZR;C;p^RXDyj-!5wJlys6$GxlsE8t4lw(e?EVoYF`N2 zXhbB0o3}a=;hU^5ZT=!6)*L`xxe3qvft&sYS?#yjXDjo7WupP_0`I z;2i%klY5+2>sB0a)}@;*Yc5smLK1MsZ}imQ|J1s`@l6BY*p6K`sC9|@otWqI7M2N9 z_2+r%KYFCzU#k8r;DIkmKmUq5F-@&I93T1@0=}#3x-=-P?gX+w@ZFnze{n#5yiFF2 zUjp!1d#_IeYsk3NeJ8YDNlU@?rqJ)bKDB{=jTjwU6HGRlygm zGwRH^pT|L83TPUrs>h=3-!joIlj zG%xw}gRd?luSV~4-AZbJu;*c_w8P^^9`t=wBP`GV?!F6xU5rC0_8HVI+J$}ATGH=O z&?^g0FBF)#gntgS)4#2j%FU=l;Bmk?zvo2PO)_YSATEvXnd1-}JuXagx%<&OV0Rky zmHT)93u*pi;{}g9j%a7!&daUUb+{=BxGqTgGd*qIIv>~}@|g3Septb`x@gK??hzDw zOj)oe6np_KzIbc`gYY{ExC?kx%+0TS6`XZB5%}a)n?C1WM#P1El5%{tN0l@~`0W|j zOz7EJ^k|bx>9em2CJ~oBv@oOQ#{ zWLAN?kqDf5)#qrrJ?vBX$?;^}$X#B!mEUvbYbNwY;vacC8;{0@~^8 z?=@|2QGx0=?U?ua!Bmcwz*8Wf0eW`*$#DAXmiMZ2y+dc5<2^y(=DG#_th#P~Abk;d z4)g|ruR>Op%}Sh%JV&SftN!rcs@fk8IgaZ;Eh=9iuh5?WoOLr|;;B(;-AwVaud(l} zq0CVsZv&nI8vObF4*#EViXP#)t?M*Bp8Ph~lkw>K%73r7e0Ni>@I}Lo!DwgxzB#Y8 zP4&|boPNf=b0O4I63~OKI%B+!2U$=ZSM5RL+_P;n$&nY zpy!)*qci-&b6*im!d|WeSf3wue{Fyok7UR(UM)Jk>chT-9sEBjWyiQYW{7?~^Di6v z7M{xry0yB_X4qjg2TMOSo$hOWY-`UxTi6){T!%X9XI|exonJQK>Cm6KYIOr;ewdiQ z^mFIQlMmJW4TpRJXovFI-I%|k{}i;d?yU-|xUneep74+BF+T5okejxp!N1Ghj~&E1 zj(#z3>30tFn(Isd_jdX*5+M+AGg;BjeE#;!ztX8o;Gw|j*YwCEJvas$-!sQ&a436m z=YgL4k$C89P+~>fdG9=aBDjPe#)6cw9jx6*!=fXH0k?mshzxNUcJxQRaRu=u^j|#=z z=`QrJMv`(q3O%APaS40VA)gKUxLDTr=PoZO2i#zOP5QaoEuquhPL5CR+#!6i_$d0} zn38I3?kj)QDf?l&4f-ZusU5Rm+MA68v#`U3c8>E~`+r_PZThUW#1nxt?)Cnt5_F+R zkxz-I0%zQh>@W;}w@!@vUL)e337l~c9Mdv(#=DO_`g4IZo)_Z$+f-S!ZYcFz8p=2@ zPJg8TV;J1PX8~|SFmSg*t?}lbovDcxm$w0KV!h%#z5U9XR@_f$_Id8JJU5EyckHr{ zRY=P?bNonI*KEqhO~jFLPK7<~wyoRO`9RWcp+}wXA!CLPA0jRC*yV{=CiG8wW$s(;rhTwM zaA;-JgNx5v{B-8VG7dqYXxE3}vu2Cu5_YkclX5=h|LUmV{0N7h%ac;SY_KJXb;FqG zrGMF?RetP9i(e5t@Kn%yQCS0Mi?(0&3&H&-6@F%dZ(*5(OU$9vB&o`uhE4+CA%m&hcLtQ}9gSoPT4#TX(m3KCWkcSbx5pm0ROPlV#rv8?^rQmJsO=>(7Uw z)AL?iA6kZZFmTqNvZmPSNrPis12@=#v;O=ur_&J4Pnnmb zoZDfeJzs-##~~4UU}-Aj@mh4_20@>;dKLW`L(tATa?$7257CX=j$p5O9KEslM<%P} z5O%Uo(9Y5^1N>;Gz~i7l3AEwb-%S*KW-IuU46gd4je)#ltgMz1_Unlr%9}ODnXO#@< z{EG+9`MNUX>*-U+8cmRLF`r1vM`ir=KhSc1d935^=BrXPj0oxb+Ej3jGe8d-3~>x6Qv^H}f1IbkN|WiF@CQa}5{kB=7S( zDd(eeVxOmLCF5WP6}a|X!4RT+)@*#{`goiWz$NAZ{RxMB&R6&T9`Q;)_dZnElZbZm z2~nY+ivUutGsZ;4MvM=W9jN*3^xZ zu0e`^lOE8ae#b zA4gjq5M1tf_)33i&&zLJji&|;H(A?AoZlnRmmYOX@01(@4+Tzpf4<+PoqRQSf-+T<;G^Pg!DA@MPf3w~>9%HZv(W_aW)vTXg5ueZIg&ymV-1oU-wG+4$`F ze4eYrCHU=#XC|nwt@MBR9owkF*3Y@f*I@7mgFor~*q+|&XAv*XFWSATb~BScR2m@g zM94ECR$FF18H=@-35+KicaQW=1FASklhmcPJ&T(Iwv#pm8aLpcH z<~i-i0Dn;Pxd%C)q&9gUWu800mjl}RVa?wB9)!xzJP!n4UTtK2?tU<@nWyvWTO(Ot1Rnglj05d> z<52DD2Gj{*hkGNd^+n3ix}stt@>eR-DAgVp^ajk_GjB@S@~s4ih8y|&4o$cF%IuZ@ zLos1bI^=l&`RZiE-@IQ6JR3OYU+VgttDK(#*V&{$^f&jnOY79{FIs`q-$wf)3Ve?! z6gcN)!*f=D&L5%Q37qTr*5~JUb$pg}@6?zwI#<5k zsnDAVdg{YHUG)l{!+x#Ozr9`0=nV>P?kw9Gm)>o=kMmLRAmEJ4@dn>~Y*cW5kH7}L zkKes|)C64IFESDLMA#7yzSgtmZ1Y2W>8IdNM&8ClE&=@C{XFS=vz?rh3jU|Q{|Ek% z_`@Ijhd#}3fqpw^4)|9N3M^MhefF%=Gf+1I-;nY0AD*6C)cUl3@A_;5|DC<@KH@x& z<0~YE{oeIC4*Vm=^}H>{T;&(_nZFBTdkXl4K9PrIKKyy3BHCcP3!y=obsH1yH|bHRh7?$oTaPu|AcwW zP_rT*jCRidhn1T?^jB~@aL)he@yTx#QSdyBlM8&c^!+Xu1+L|RXMfLmlnB07vjVCI zU_R+^34ZT+l?wjfcKP-z<|L=2g5P^yWrP3mq46z?KRvH}z2}vsn~cka7Uk!a2z^?= z_q+-P|9dr^11!N$^K<{pdF2BCH%FcCVE=OT6b*Cit7Ks=q{> zmvH`wp2WJwdtQllG2gN{zq(8RgFyu@&O>aozFquJJ4f%PDbk?!~=WC zIOz0}9$NJ8je2+6?j#-poXoM-y@6_c~dp zPF>5a%jb~pI)HTm$0-l`QeW2@jaFer{w4UcXb)nP95ho^wX{E$eH7d?OG*x zG~Aetc1@@ITDt4be*9PDzi$$7#zEIh`c>bzR8Pu~U-%UVek=G|ezoLZvqf?UectoQ z4!#$^IMA1S0_xMm49tDeChCv({1WZrd*61>3+PJ*O$AkL72o^LK)aCFuxHL2yI{bj z#?#ze#v%FYgsT4*U3^2Z2tBL`q_n?ZEoyPc-BY*h&~tiW=V3Xe7Q4spd3t(0Lr)U) ztTr!yvDnr_|NJj|VxOTW8+zh`m+vYcS=~iR$;eD1>zPG;gYsi7{wMgo?~7^R-{2Y* z>sN?9-uJ~E@Q+-XSIk_9J;AWw6PLcy@3RrrR{CrF>LurVfv8CCV+(kg-H0Oz{%)z3$q zF(^3i*Ob3j{exM0XTE$;Kj|;!6aQ=Wg#ox0e_xK54SbB#hqc}wMTJIKSgMKDOueqWXAgfyfu0-%&mf z{na?$^S;4FOC{Cf=eeIvPA~SQXpOUG9(vEGZjkuDhU;w(86V!y-s$=1#3S8{^3@yU@D0*j1O?Jzjr?f(Yg!XII65JQTvZ}sr{xx{`7(Q zv3dnhM0*CP^+?cMW4c@1EuVvSt_Q5SmL?|PTCAS=-X^?{(-T{vQH-}HWP86gOl-DTvU= zc&CDI+kfY~_<&E~*=T3HlgFOBVFWJhbbql#(>G-4g{HbxsaUns`lj?R{@kkv^uSd+ zIUXV4d#B%Lv4&(A2qN_9fIC31uRqh+q}Z8&c8<^M+e-HJ1un*iYX?#@bi3ckmigwpv=2+1>np_6xOw6mv1+LyTPk(q1Et@L+s}rzOMMhP1UUUpeJf$4QNbO+ z=}&I6z*G}(5%;RHD_s#?NiF4NHi@|A!QME?CxQMm)mF?m7eXL{-+}Q>fm|y1C$`wJ z&@cOG{yfwJGxGxc^GE&oyBYDOl+d37e#;;k59aOd1&{9eKh5uX4#9dF3b~k9dUP$4 zPR){P`hEEvA`tz!z&~Y2ql!gSpXSfy`84WvGWhQ-?6@)@xgft7$29O|f^X6MUOS4V z~SbHtqDNd@&4X0H|e*D9Kiuvr-NqdQr*u?fSa<=&V5~p3Ddezm&mg` zFMRi+rh^SaSi1zy`&8f%>2HZqi>rEKpsjED{w?YZ0iTf9+Mc;j>gL`72`+a(9{=JX z|HZwI9mmhVJ`lJu8SPxBRHz!waOWS1y}y1`R(U@9-9e%%lxAM@jQqUf}iz_=drrs(yue!r&Tdp$tkJe_pWEb z;IG)%kSF4=`XKnd>zNb$ReyMAwipMMU+g2jpMNHTUs#~!g^}-7qg-+`%SLIP8#iTx zpU*3fPiWpkeJ-X8lm2m?GxW{072N-byt4x5zAx?PANH%y#X^B|pEl#pvD)f$F(+{5 z^@;Hl+w-}YX7e-WXGH$%(1o9#I*|;0B@9dMwyd1~m~qHJJL|-$UF|&Yof3ZJ0B3#~ zr<6R*m66?phIlvZwl5wy^Xtf%h-dzRFY)WnF=m&pz$N%uhdJMz;J@r@ zUCiHEfL*Jv`Om9Z9}~g<;-c7oMeI-Wd)LQw@Za0Kt6tI2r}@3>V=nkB+^D-a0OL$4 zVUKrxv_{DITub+DP|QkBNd>=meYAtW{Ekn~h~H%}Z-s>5_pXoe;IDdn{8DlDq4I0u z2Hw|&ytq$!*GthZ?o;WggQ?J$4VnvDP_JHZejD>blNWWE?-wPX_j-qRkn;XHBLB78 znjUSviFH>v^sldTquISxkKI2O*KlJZ+PThXQRl?J!Uu7Q`I-ux`7p{=ydiB8c%~Pg zF=_e^b)At5ob|X^(;M~Gbq4F8Wt8;)=D!clsOyYiw6hKl{kH03t}{gcT*q)e&MuK{ z_OZInciT_>F6b$K>D_z0uL}7@Fa4VWCigT!Uds>9e6xcu74(bF>o@pn387vhpE%#R z?#TrI`5(%q`>D*@|3&_IkF#JA`C~)ebfaZl_}-adeC8MkezDH6pZ%XY_f8ZFYKLqsV@Jr>@=UWauFZ9%9(j+qw9BYVK)h{`=X0z$d}h1_zsRFR zw2RMTT>1SJ`c-1ePrp+};F;j(^W~ztflrkAZ{+)eDN|+CvK*mXTteOwCHI$vheH6QoGdef*k8d_s|s~s(w50M9`b@!+vK?)%c#d zuh!l_UEq5I{9ZsN^z{4YpZ(5&v+gM`?94+u`=0p4)&lQ0O9dY2lJS_*|L|KTI3nT@ zf_C~*%RcZV_fZ1pdwd+=Ti0dyV%8fs4*mQdPTs{vPiTw48HXgu*ZQ;FPmF`W)6gCW zy4P=hylP(-+NuBT)Eli-`{ID-flmE)Z-MvT(Eh-&(*M=Rs+MM+YyBI&pVOLa{gk1O zvjcLBPwg#Ezry^B1K*wBc73J#mxOlux3g>a5Y@jlFa0$yF6piMNBgtDH)PFlI%ALc;y9AW7YWceb}_Q`LVK-)%a&Yj`5%3Xi|)C)%)TVZ-~RgQ7S+BqFZ(`f z`-@4nFAF&J-=YI3c1u@;!_&XrS zIy&H;h=Hnq+?Nyo{PlhbDxL&+*74>Q106~oH>Cj&MjdH=;qC>c4x3zP=X&CosqH4| ztgmwuUS#9BV=!~?#H1Y2lyJ* zKXHod1x=sl{o0I20{9{u-hZ3pqUvLQrGPJf))&i_@iB3J)Bmm=T6EFF{sR6(e$1iV z$p!o$U(o*>vpY3=uK(cgHeup{=lT!6O<#=o@VWkjFDW+l&~yCObULPiuFofd3N;`tRFg#E;MQAN<#+T(9z6|H1dF&(|xS>p%GJd_8||Vg6^q z?iBD%8~*d6B1jPT_+nhMfEPdI_g_&34`KcTKmSvzZ-9cQp)Ll-$v9j-wAxin!9!5L zLxA5*NV~#k^6qmxla%9}c7RW)(Au8)z6kf<)5`D1bMBP{`H?-B4%;{7oe04q{B*o5 z`(YjE5SQFYtrOXh<2+uqt?V)G_r$#8{)qEVH&N;fT5K%FdJA*h{qeZ~`Ac^H>n42^ zez69T(w1-+wYcr}_~k->D+V;^J8siG_iyioU-XA|rylD)&Vc=$hU@u$0>1C)OwZc& z-;8keMqG?p(97p0|4n*v2`$j%4VkY=Kf{`TK1a0YjhynQC+;jV3b?@mJPg4pR=s5BFV>!LKfBQS_q;!o_I35yB}Cnq z>VFoV2Q>QXpK$eDE(!Y6Ko3sbUf?||S!n0{Uv;bKBc4YJ{dvF{-%oZ|VIc;3cy zxtB6;?9tn$eIjr8JM6&8GEO0&?PpwZ_=ZY8{wwYmap*6#vE+Ave?*&vtA4@cl+ z#xDVUUB3xyZw8;h)6h=)yNr6vz~5VHxaYkNjPHi!wjbGxkY|1|KEXex-7#2|{-Hl` zinO=X_Fk=h6g&j&?Egv2?_FyB%%XkZtCDhLDt}iY;*kXZ(m>9{j-fqtHL0-+NwXfPb0u*AA>>o= zb>UWiy~~$(U_bF?>A-X9dM_OEdBAHF```}iy6B(lkwmOpmhY+9gY`$?DUfHpcYj>t zN1kUqukJ()rdHsmzd+$Qt1^vWx9xNZl8Yyr)@I=sJFGjs#f(rsq$9X&J@2I}MsVFgS z`!XTNb>otKJ1eOAbEzM3{^`dF1=fw0ccfoj_aCUWVU_A%FmTSBrcs9`Rt{gwU`kf-#|`@NdF>C!&-AGq)(Uv)gPq1Ot& zwvk6}7J+^(@1A)cGdgTUf%6zU>X#FG0v=uN<=7dtNT*#|9E=HQXD)Y7-*!P@;u3MP zR*`mcT;GdZw2!<3&wxDhzFW@QHPyV&0nYjoSKKs+YZM{RaW>D8{n+me^E_J+co5nd zr?TVH3cSxK1^R8^Yj*an$7&oyUMy&Ty++#`srDy8j`o-9a^@}7{uJP}KfOYe4^;az zyzKkEXYW4h{U{uG4(R4#JAYxGYIZzxJsKS`GModc#liEQ;-Hz*pHe@pPXF)aoAWVF zMmyT++sYO7-QRKLIC4G8IKI^V#TsfpyC9zknp{3@p6UnpeKz>fpv00HYMe76M?d>E zX_7%d#WqeR13Pd_SD&-I zp9?$_b;bp}&D_1U1FRxC^4yy1stnwp62bS%xw8p;&zasO+0Se3^6qin?DhxunGEnn+|r#@*ULF*4+QN~ZAPxLUiQ3ynfCo$ zHLROzU(oxqU-rN9VV7ThmG!t8xDB+%?Tw#ty({cv{bgR2L2b zj&A?G`ZwL2b3@&)u>NL%uh`CsGgSLhP%qg3*>;0ksr{Q13i>y6)yt37{ZbC}27#~D zjMbCW__MAtKI_tMj#Tr>g}M!UFr^$F0+{dUES%-nHlD>8_u0Ox*tL`t8L*ET)idm;=O zz)PT0SG9V@TkWW`6!M<^cuC;3PB#pB`!M$u>f4PjsbBcXnnB7K#7rDB24)oS(*=F!7AH3EI;evCUCElA#w4`U&sa;M z`?nQBhwvi}IQ^V?HyR~q{&csR!id~J@*D(9!*%tzLf;m&LRYCTD!eV`}n zgv~Q6@>ytSzUus6cliU?_DP=en>_IGy_35-Sf&*LAID4Ox54hf4`qDD4G;UEsFR$M zihYj_4*nGIy)x;&@Z#VTcoy23 zr}O6K+Da%m^PJ=J@Y3<~J_;TASuPo(KQ4!1r@!{c%e^?s-ow>v5$4 zgZ1yOX;oLJU0VF~fgef#S&yx4evI88_g(()zk#zJzq@2@|8_?*et^8e0lYMd%hh>z z7bj01$@5VYdynt`E?|%M_*Nc8t}kG+5i0>gOW^&{t&ct{A^7Y_4HM6&Tj|!z6(Cv*-yda(9UzD zb5FVq;Co%%{sZUxJ!_vkkmC<|bv~wnkMp;Di{dScfKQBtxP(5wH#Q6Wo1WDAx~O6g z-=E5SA6PwRpt?Q^nlIzPcpkofHj=en=(ho9K6cyDshi1?-@h4nIH-M+^CQ*)Q7_^U zZ@v#S0er@ny80J3|MQU7Dd78RdHkZ1q51t~p`GvD?fCfP1*H@`u%+~e_v;s`--%NF z30xp?&Y$yNKRN2B$mc1?`+I_J!aPfZAJnnO_-nOA$Ilv#0)^tpn;DX<06mj6W za4O{E!2eU!i{;B&bp7yW`lp~;30pNCnKmBR}1u7 z79w8V7vIu;cH_R>mGYn589v8P=|3IvanL{J`w{!i3eNp(9OT<~Yy7=B&bmcXFY~tP4--$TdCUDQ z<$vgD>88$$P{?yX`{kBR^;G>%;H(qb+fDOKR%xJ!56?^E!FT(!hzIIb~(Yf{-^ZL zg`F401FsR#Dpox&(m_5M_?V@ZM}?giS(yjmoBraA-~T`7McLr*>FC|0u=Ap9%rDCl z8K)_gEjJ1~FABu`+dcSFZ8blfkYjxQespg_Ve^af4c{Dkt-$z0p7U#Bk0}*Y{prA& ze;N8|=hgg+!~Ds@xyip5JIAQ|W}eUMlB9o^+W3rD_sv$c^LHI>lJ0L*_suDFr5yDy zf3*LAx^EAKyc4wN?Y3LgeKqGF{nyVvSm?QQGUV^QH?(O1|IyC=+b!#mTG+WrHu#pl zTVs}LALk$Y@3g49U5&r>lY;*Jw_tijqjujCm#AMl;Gv*{c2x;b@sCGbbW5e5b-uXX zTRGS8oGZ-6I`-H4AC-JGWq2F-?>SeP3;f#WnSF})-4en01Y&>1eZrzKk;9BGfy(%C z9~qDS^Ypu4Fe!L4+PThsJFsRcUj^qnGaYO!U_3! z(627F`bgbJa6iENj}`f!4F3KDH_a$)AHn@cHtvt<;Lm%fcjoi<5%J*91HZlMjXD3H zeMHdbGCm7G_+VdQ`-o8Jb%5{9x5f@s_YuihXCwf3tT9z6Y#$LAEBh%k!PQCKM`S=Q zZ-T@deel7(067f`>_Z$e5-(D(q4)@AH)Z^=3e@dY|PwI{|uHZ@4vC)t`cP&hz(fU%6?r=Ff9JU&sJoeDc5A zkLmJp-sjo>ceP(%p!RS6Li$hrlfK>`t**0kpf?D7i8q_}RM*M8&$It4D-Zms_8$&8 z%C}#!qK+!hb#?;y8aI71PhDrHpxqPSrN$-dI@<<31GN5_7JqY{t?rY<;YSYmdiQ*# zUr~#U6aOu2pKM+s<8%ABK3$nt>I(`|D=Q?@ES3d-)`I7^jxS-kZS?6p5zT>>#`G^(z=DDPcoPgU?p)MoV9%f6h<#|Is^Nc-}uM z@+ZYh|BfcrMi%f7cm` zHkSIL?liws0(?4L1^DrNBph;qe|&o1g7uZc?`uQea-Ez6{*jgAuX8=3@&|#R>*NgZ z&mOy@d8uG>O6rae&L{K0cQv?3vC`lZc+gtu59e?7MNj?~>ke@Voag!6hn9>T)j@q; z749Yfx9Qkcqax4wPx*aYDt@GX-#G>Hoc}53r=C*vX8>pYyxGCuN7bJIJO^}b^2%Q7 zKG}x+VgGd&4DYVuoF73cG7dKvZSA7&V^h53cl|m0oZ7z)a^axn%j0jW`&`a1>aVY_ zHnf0#FZuR6-g#G*=RP?Dd?CALlu`G|IcR78F8|8ZU)?7s(5`jTznZ0npHcV8X5c}< zH+0Cor0kPTHpJBi{Hv00y-_xQd_B*Dw&4Ep$CSpsx-PHWi}}O&vwna4y={^yRG>1y z82=RLFI}`|UEfeQ?9M;NpYlD%^eON>Edz2npdD|O`^Zm`XMLo6Y16t~9|dRsLF;9F zzG**Ut5L-($#&Xz;-ny=bqqtuZ^WO%X z`@98jOq|Glwp#DP!N>YoIUsZs_uD#LLLZ-3C4j$er=>%beX%JG?cC>$YS1f=bx^F| z5-`r(=VgJvao@m`h1Ngt=Yg-o)wS))<>#*{Xrqh^_j$)c-nm*{!MV?~LC=-6;xqXE z40n7W9}c>qUf%UU$P0V9&oiTLCx9>Yk3EemSQ!~f1wWtrq+nf_0{&Ist-N2+@-%-k z)@8gOWP$(is1cprUxHCYguUU=Yu+UNesR11+!w$j@Eq*7LV!;jbLKqXT`F)sx8d*e z%->DC;;+cZL5{!AYW!pU`9&2xwYKb+zZX1o@^)oE_$BnGL7w&ga=mYdn-!e>^Y=_G z_w<=>RB%@m^jDCyf84e&^$O1QVBltn2krj;tonT*t_MSazxPt>L8^WS+G*d5n=D7v z^*rl+9QYnrI^4-u>7VOC_HVhgdXw6JnwS2c!qT-LFUSCj_#^?(0{!jn;Gt^#@({l~ z;3NB1-kPsJaEpvf2x#VsuVn{`83GWzIHV_wN~X*>PY*tz&Fjg$*%gx?{`vuLWQI6sqxK&Twtoy zlQ4b7K7S>?33X*V->>mUSf#S+_&Oj*{eLyDAE(+M0z3|MbL&~hizxbC^`w5vpFecJ znL)vmAeRQ}pR;;0_p$ErXMBNo`gPlB{!U1*eNW3Qhmx<5*8Xypykesx#zzbp?f#(Y z@%&CN@Jnfr<>#hr>c4!Yj9}1kV<_4+o$hPye^=e#5fLAR9eL>A3BHfJztWb^r3CJP zo$iEn2;#RjRw|o}zG#PkACEHsifQveqhWX37mJYsv0k0q8-$Rw!q&-Q{mkqwH zV=v|M?~)38n71k8rN3$Vq7iD{3jRvA^LM9LQrpvmkT+|HtBzbB27*fR@dy{%hdlH zqxxru9PKMt+b~+S&qW;byWzcA)j2Ok|B1kz$j^5ceww1rmte|+9F9{i;%bXJPr83_bgczh_YMh54EeJfh|CgKEBHd-b0b(Bi+s@>Tb>v?Jp|&ob(G zGGEz$kpVeR)c!*uNB{2m_KjEjw*q&9_U}|GM2!#c!|}k^%`Cr8jZZS#Lr^EbzSy*V zVfm;7U;2l~DysHpqumLrUuY_$_OII^{ignUm%4X0EAzn$ocEd8pI$hi_MZ;Dq2N0= zaMcW+yNY~{NBo_@uMA3D#_u;2R=?xHm$<6PXwC~cJ7xV2g}!9)?W)&edMV|;Xkq>X zHxF6Xv9y9aQ2%p*r$jwGTt&fCu&%YF$+%4EbY)ak1$Qo#?ZLobY5(#sR^Z}$U+HlY zw@#EaZ;GUL@EfYv`@5Rv5bu}5H}`w%Op;G+7w-{>gFYAJQ$U5B_I@Zsy7F0z=Tq+^ zbp%Si9WP$?{2d}8D=xwB{l2|i=sVo_6+ZHo%-X;1_uzTiY27LH3nusb)4XuDC-^_@ zU#QMkXNSB=Flrb5ccDE2l=(8`Id!!IOk*0S&llaC&J$};JJ|FdtR&O zM6TufihUFoAImq=kMH~UDlhKKs$C*J*Ot{g=Qb-p49<#HEc_{`z;fjKlifxyK?~uYZ$xDBAgVv}P_? z{zsWrt#1=|0@vxKykD#G3GKd~>3%n@&>s(+e@AO%$df*fmC3(D-jEEOe|Kc8qx}5F z<=gSxOrH*%-_u^O=kfZ3ZAW%u|JlI#J?&PDhd)?RZOKaN*X@yZ)e;TbHGJyLS&@ss zcqINW;>3LcsjmREt5?LNuA-z>{Xz~Wy`7(t1hrHae?x}L`iI2igu7OFpX6`n`Gn@s+GY9=GJAWa( zS+O5J6MBT5mc23_nojrCuvTS0h8DPq^Dh{D2R|v2LSBtNGhQ)X@nSq&(6i*2?S4~R znGK>-VMh|$8Lz3`zL+j8lJVl->*4QPoRh1x)4L>xurmwteBNW6+jO2m!P9`}f!^E@ z+`}gyH)fSA7>9A=Mmp90L-t9W{l8QF$0KV04&dzn@V&$vYX5P-`Ml@bH-kzm{hN}2 z^E|e7!wJd8eEUp+ln0&GsKii{g7fe2(Z0DG8%`$@P1U}@bm<@K@E@P- zY^&NA0-X68x%j<1s(lXNtiv1bjeAM8FAM$0fv?NUdoz6%`|TK)B;enjsk+J!xX3eK z3jYn)`9I#EuL4iQxWohhyv2okW{k5~fAH^<@b9`OgD=RowZ6ZT zmPji2`S(=#ciq#$zpz}$*G244^YibM@b9|kg5NwQz*aQ$Y5ok<%@o$_?__+Io-Q{} zoOjbVAt~&!dhy%AU#{(>V#Taa^LxK9Iv)IGY~ihoTiiM8G0LqU>szjKQ^8;LbCbS= z#>ue|LSlUu=UZ?*v%xQM?L8CCB+fj2sk3Phb%^l_J|J<9*Xh&8Zth@8r-KSy?2EFL&zjC>uJ>ZXMvo9O;?l;~QxD9Cq~CFuqE6OIKKQG^ zMZWQU@2vZl7bKs}e_ki9!v(Ln1b;B}@bBZ;@%iBSCnbEWZZ^+9g5Nuy@!%gEd|;+H zS5V_4_`Tzq3jT6`+?*ut2`aycTe`2bm+jf$7e)l>e2O{^66ZMc{ecMe{pI3 z`g;2nd>C?ny-}qQzn*#zyaW902Yl6$=Ot3R)bH(A0{D-;)cRlE>&P$i#M>`vr%`8t zTpI0zP!2vb4x(A?6LcBU5Aj*dcWs$Drf)T!j_ZKWemQT}Yx9P9TFruZpAGl-s<;#S zm@lWB1w}JYg#J+A@t{e^eN5_pEg9_`hyN1BUFLpG$j2f7(!p2ln|r2Sz~A^+Bwy;XKJ_DJw@U$T%mhE>JN2tQS7722@yZ3xcr9HK zo}|XhazyH7yv7b(ZDqWKJja3gU|1V8SsiaX&UINAVi!*9VF(qy%l=)^PkCe7@jgDG zZrE*~9e5(>;M9ySjljjc<8xoyp9;QKwJUu^KcqI%Oc9% zLFASB2dS6)=(;uB_+^ufEjsq3BBJ z_q=bC{a1UV$=rm%U2g!_CwTS0A|SrrQQtC)h^KhpTXsjIY zS%(8_-MKHuC##b5kNY7|bC%R7>jR-`U$8_<1=)yj#79k0}B2wC_~6|2q39cnWZi@4kjw zt~w?KXZ&ejTASb7s`fGd3DC3G@$CrJz7#L}djGhzx@unraE{OLgX_Dh_Jsq_0o^fo zvBg)h&wN7q&-lL8JiV`BNtlaGv;D!v~?t-E{{G*RkpqT%_nIA7)`}~H{>4tUs=bT4G4v!8SCfVG6T2TkW zp)Y3D!y~^m>$+92XmKzmqTO6y+H?GNsWuQ7xG9x5@}PTEuRql~l?j~rI$_7mLu#F3 zonRinzijPn=CROkIVJmL9h$W|aF1H2f`N0KhyQxuj9RD6m|u+3r?X76)OpG};)0&@ z_oq}-=V_vs{wbA{e^u*9ikJRnH?F*+>d%Bc`!CgP)d^L9D)3y;cdL~6M6Cnd|0bZH z3st_|sn((3A7y-~zvjBA$!h-=;C9gaj>);;~#gr_F%?ets^eTCxSY2KU`T@ z9kF5F+Tl+s_`9C%TDPz|!oQDYM*d`jKO=AF8{Tz9Oqq3F`ZnJoCCMCc(0LY1s$NmAEc31;cOlzh(1_ zN7Q^|zGb7IQ`U%BW4u%*?AQGy{bD}1-d292Nx@SPC+ctb{%2OBf?FXU3VQJ42aSAH z9Oo&#@1O6KJXf7h@sOkb*K4n7rP}WVo(%few6AyhLBFW;>F_HZIOCi!B|63oJ{>N> z&wNQ{+#%QDXoms*UiT3ZpHT2w&d4~~T4dD@P{uzL?ab@&i~Fh+Q*bA6#<%W(6%oZ1 zJRUgb)5bm76H5RW_U53j+mMIJ;IHF%qn5=<&m;NaF>_s_4fD( z-^~V$kLIW6+??Z*1^y0u8}9T86}{$Pf}iKGJfF)0f3J_KU*&lVB?LduVfp=mptCYA z%ZuLn#bhO?q=Mi3T+adifIs%t^wr|7#!>Kl$2|f350m=m_-SfYei2`%SKQOUFD!7+ z`!>=(#`B}2jkDBvntzoz)h&&Q>XbL-U7D)XCA)Wv&3Mdf`VPgl^7d+z9#>;cgoeTL>Uw&DvMa`5g0@t3u=|cmh zzk5q8T%$9HR{8y&kn^%#wL{bA`Fj?2;7{(xZj@3o|H9GkfZiVS;(wwJkv|E*dEZzU zb?lhIDK!W@1vvBXe9tx4eSm9vp67Q1simObInbvYG->Ph$XV`VlmDT|y%!U@)c6Je zCgZVbbIhzt!3_@q_tY=0b4P!1aS+$J!k;+Eaouz2n?HxC>!QH^Qg0IYzFWR~nz}AZ zLp$TOGJgLZW4!2H#ybl*>)va*!@e@byJ2C!DUWys+0U!78%lD z;Ed<1&8OA#QSc1ljAya8m--kLJO?=ARjgIjaFc?Yv!y?*k2BjJUFxggLBLrb`|S8Q z+Yh*?*AB!p5dGM|-#4ZAi{>N*1w`;$z@LFU3u&=1=bZlbpAtb&^Ly9dH1Jov6|mD1_%weo>`#C_ zIpFWRXz&Lm%?0`0>lfT#Q(H+t120J`BCpOD)<4m%%`?w=MmYGp7yFhhFO+@}^|qoEIx?&g+JxeB8o#Vjh=nJULZw$;Y!H&%9q)_UtT!GaskC^-bwd zoau%8`qX^fdRew}-i~ri`_7=?tW%-j`@mYRiI0Li(N6oT-_`wXRPbQf&v`q$fAt{- zSAPHTkWU6ZKj!^6Op1Iu+PSWn(#E#S7r3ZL{PNb~J$=5{W#;Q;J|Y6g&htwjm>9HWBA0q6a!>klSBlY%D!XT5u^ z=av$_3ZBOPG469VE=}|UuGXV$#3u{<+4oO=WX_O&@?XKvdZ7b<9{6iN4w>PfR&YLO z{Ju}k|KDXCCr-_KQY57yzsU1+<~jH(b$5;}s_}_S;LJnjN&4-56V&tZ6v(kY8?qf^ z42e(6Gv2FrSMH=w&c|~gPyJikOuk}JaOSc3s`O*rw$=lD6g&v+9FMtO$LupIIQ4U$ z&HCJIR`uH;9}e34<2pGeMgIR7`|iM|s`vdQP1=C^cBZc^qK>_H`M(NuD1$e%xN$e17$=I$h;ED85+={W+~JcF{;U z%X5F|IAzjSwbWlse~7rS{+Sc6_R&Z<$1e`N+0pM543cm=&U1fxUFY2xt%S3FzJ74z zOt>ZMPl9|3%B_vhjnql-vXQ!W|0zP1g6?tCMgSa2_WX z|8=Kzu!N@r=eTut-76RZTpkCq5FZct>wYTtjy_BH$^XjZfF69+9pU#!Wi82}nR)v) zjRVScLk##oWG+&Lx%2X=9lFsDZQyn3vUWkZmq&-(PPv^d==WK$+)lZjr9wXJUU2`Q zbf36SJ_F~upA>xWs7EW|*}z$T%FBf3Ite%275;KNImK)Prj4qc{|R>A+A;DpFb?m7fHa`?@>QLYAnwe+zz;%g|_OuO>PHnh261>H$Ily zK`@W+Tz?k$Z6AfNpmv}pM{rOcQh@94iFizDy>4PC+6(!cQ%IcW>wvXulRL@&S|P{w z-rrhvi#)$30_T3w_VnN)^89K;JLNnyaJ||n_nS1xbH9AizQ|d*-()K4e?0ktM~+tx zaMu6cp|x+y@#6I=$1D22@HbQ2qGzCZIoTiZ)Hy4bNb%Cyah~%#q0^bru-tg+3}&I9 zNZOo^``s2l)32j~N|;`cRd3 zzs#%OD(v>49i)O^PjhmC9`RwmHxJsJMuN}dcaxFLqZubZ%HfX!_g6-#r1)|>kI5GD z&edC1sAU}I<4~??Trz~)i7)>+&-({k&mXBPw+|kNlE7PC>Z2iY`!L`=`Z2`zk@EElKqRrd0vN%-27J! z**-mRJIX@szq`Th*PF*+GxFy_{*u7!aiEeaRFOyG^KHWlt1vuQ$(l51C7Pc9IV7zV7e=AKUv&kL#(t_V~wbH}qC+ zY)`MDezKWleEk6DxgQ)|_d_Sb=pcWh9}9nZ{tFK7qm|e5vA}sgvxgQPFR$mVjN|(B z$9Angm)Glwz`5P8AL!V|>vgI>1@<|?ODWTJivjVV{P2ET4Av=W;QiI%SZqP>I#oW1 z&+8vEUk`&{V_)*NLhk(QpJc2P^?!>v%-{H7dSNe*4ze#6=Xu}a@3$hpFCyVq;N0II z{?q^cq7t46ob&y|+Ar1>lW-?+j?dIhgH6SO%l@ZeJ)H*rJ5BYaqtk?){IBf48`r^^ z;P-rfc4&!|{Qf6_r~gOzKj7K)p(VXMI(+`)JYVl#?p=9YDG9d%=kch|Wy{IZ5}pX0 zXOW`e(SL6O78BxZ_| z_{#lO{Sy&~W?iR-l}pUe=k{g6xDg9}PK}kP%iHtDm-H*Io9y6M46WLzf;B&1x!>Xh zzt4;{?^KM-&*$|k+v5hm%GO=OE5+vLEB9M-!0(jQ^>SrXe!gz!@ z&sXlZTESmy&rCPz^YZCBD>X#uQ%j+y`(ts~M@oWx5b!koE%WLASO(4$&5Ql#I65fa z-n-AB(f#{L^?BR5e;hUB2z!>7Sv}{2rnF+>boXTWkojgV&R;FBek4-4|a`Ty|ub|1;l!>Ilh^87xWFRCnR5o{xAAdRY zM&LZp*_K@YEJ%_!1LyvI-8^@IR>Ez-IsP?_ac}B?d-Lt@e_X!<{Ie_1%?wUZI?e^SE|F)9$iP!tKDhpRE`@_ENBf^ZP}Uz!%aZ+BIL~>wbL-X@p^|?6YvDhStIoeSHVl(+6L4Sos9aF zFgm<^MZM}!8|2>~-{^C}qI$ji0|$hj1mJOtniuD>j&SqAy!h4fbFXlnK6%Kcpe#_v zF^k7cpFGaHQN~0z>ZgSPggYw>{aL_0NlN=wtPWa8^d-LAKzYF&ELprGc@pS^n-voY<`#a4XC&3o>@_PZ}!2A4A`Nwj+ z5^M)>1|GtCz_3ksYf3AbFe@W1P=8CRpYMk!*z#d&WXzT;MlQEB+E&n^}4 zM3m-tI{WWQQ9SLi+X?(u!<#qc@h%PLdAzeu>G6#`9%U-c{m%~k)yj#TxxJIWNjT5_Vbao1-j@3> zzt1=YywZo>NC`(kNnT$)uRrS>$DPeHK0q!DWu@`%`E)%=hp&Ffv;9NTSEtGLn?i;E zY+uBY^CM;Z^}yp$78o{acBD}6({IQ5jcX{fv_Hw+PIM3_-H)ek~PqvraKhMWiU)8IU zr~N~o`$r2?+tRW>{`L>v`kr4N`CtA-hr|Cyb(RJ4$KU?JD_mHYXMW`P+JSd_(D{Pw zPZG|vzte4h?g-fa!J9uJ z6e0X)`wBHRwv+AG1CK*_W_-=9a{K4^d9(b5jO8Qc^`9MbNho`^8Th^2Khoe=3UK%C z{(sB;L(lmJe*1UxDye_?-+!>S=_x3NfK2rF{zdwF*u~N|! zwK^IZHv#A0AHTQt{izEbyDtFO!~vf|C%nf8#eN%B`entD^ndEVyiddHhlGh+wyO#B z9)xrI(4&89a+=)Wc1Cy#^mG5~kb1o@zi%W^|8s+Hn^w6K=SkEi>PrHig>p%nYazEc z(#QKCCfLLKAkKZpOl}vlzUTrXez7P|T{e`F+ov7p+5VFk7j}$5g1m9~?|qO_T#LvP z$1DZ<4i+9-u-E8Mx)Y1y#OpY|jz82x-z3;5bP&$#{A|c)Ub|2zM8bKTWBE5G*r&;m5lTEb`u~!%Fusvs3f0^^A?ni*MD0$EEm^i6cPQL z4(Kc4Mx9e_g7?8@ zRfhbX9*%DY>iKKl=0CzE`D~m|MY;X^`?De>+=O|O^&kE9Y8~DOr}!BPBL67cynn4j zq$JPnkLAA^c&xf?KkpMIKtAV6?*bu`JhwlVZ{BUnPqKV6ItY`+C~Hp+P?PTndY$tUuy z*kt>&VRtfkJ%(HIe6KfqX5Rks>flhl+&?oQ$NTXM@AlXqVo~`HU;hWr^KjD3zR&a$ zo;f$K{y{HBtPGa$m?9!BY=88NkBZ3p4ZtlZTa+so9V*Eu;5@g_`Ue)w49ms+^JsMp zTF0VtUdBE?zlI#}+V6jl5YOWahyJzmueZa~fvYp1pXc!&5lx&mYfbLVcs6jJ$9Jbs zZdxOB(nr8GhN8m18mK=tW$J-jj|?4v`@f^d`S%R`xuVWYsF;5&kmv8{^_;7_Ah(YM z;2gh#m1@4?_T`;-{qK=U1}~$o$cN#JQ6sq>iQ4kMMdjSiznA#IF~Ipd zdLH~;Z^LE-&oeSV74hQv#86Dcr`o>wxpe&+~*Q;5@g#3T2Dj zi-aD+lYw*l=svaAQhM(t9h84dtcVBazn=R>lNOmt*}&BqkmvkQ?D4X&aear+7|-VV zYY9DZy_>E&P-Vq%)^8{-{Huxle>|Yh#pa(LuMFIuf6m|VGZzQzjD#Zpkmv7&rB^Cm zL0&&30O#+7U3;+8{~g#o`3H~lKWEaagS?IqwTb%pJ7KBdZ`k5&Dz7IzIM3e+i<)qy zKIfU%c`?BGJ7KD5;eYh0(D*?4O-1~S;4SHTe`r*0esmU`=kJ6K`tiD&zpFv{Yas0gv`o4ez*E!i}2gzukso;;=`_`;Nmc0AnB*))_=6NL* z<6s8lrVsYM2f>_Qj=xLB>jeYGXMG6~r%6>tUr>I3n(E8I`jXdi$yjfgAvgS=yZwtA z^VUcC;QKJVeoq8HQ+4Z5F~o`UPkiORWGeUz9KRk2^d0IX*yRCl{x5U(M?){^v*UVz z*Zqc)!q2Rn+iUr^WL!VxGYj)^40!XuIa%Fzf#oF;?#6n`2K>uClP>f3*62QkO|kDw zx@kW+1=k%8$hlAwPWLI&q`#>iC-$FWhKqjvWq}h%5sKFZp@h4Gt}>I zkSa~lZqmRbiq}5>I^o^zS9;O8gS)?(wbl8?WZ>!?@OhpXX1iM|{7Iu0j7OId{_{Ga z`qPc?KaM%R6SyW8__uVzd!!G0GTl{Wpl@HA;%NoW*Ui=mB0mF~Cf(-szK|5{D`%X* z6Cu}rSN|6Bx;_QxIlt|Oe5B#|o$}#ke4^0vM#}L?d|gEL@Hm!+da}U3+2o0hug};X z;-_K#ZvkKb2I8^i`AMG7WxjG8iUohE?Mh4D2V%a@-ZzDv+#lB_pU(4Ma3|zB|FOp- z3UdAfwO9Vmp=pseGEjTv{l-k_{o}d%q}*QhWrcs-Ka%T))|T5V$DQ%B!JC_@rT%4t zd>qQ)MvJzDNO&6RwF95_dO__l3FrOW6tw#Z3o>Hm{+$B3M6}xyl`B-|eHe--k1M>c zI%V~K4*&rtob6|P^0sEXWcztN!}!WRuT*NIP(bo}qlk|Q<)AJ4Up2Y7e}9epTaPkL z+IKs@?N`#^l~>y#$NkOL@xmMFZ*;XWo&=oxTZ^gFPLJJKyee=_3h+Pag!d>KKV-=J zmsd8R|9kcO`{Q49!h3u=COfHL=b_#wF-8C4_kd*~j$gvCNj&U61*+b*l8ye_l@=XUt^!^=CRb)kP<&+Vtpo-)V#l#HuKHchU7QJbib z*Y!!@x2!#AEsxVwUmDJv8VP%fN7mcQd8YAE51iM@nfSZKlC!%4~H+4tNsE&b1~!weZBhxVHS{?zNO+R$@0Y7U~eq&V<%MM)S}-QXWh*>;_tvyl(-(~a>#RY~}peBeek zUU&QQ4BW6)#J$m}sNbb=P-kH|+~?E$yx{L3qo_r;$BJ=00sNtt(`)kmC$@>|i(!2z zS2f%APjPA9NP<1-zzy?$aq@be;->r_n;r9z2mGil<9+LTIc~HrSFW$fCR&$g@;a-s zh)*m^!f9P@k^ZK3&%X;uC?Vp-?;BBHu5v!eL{hm2@s+;|a6n(v!Ck6o^FLP~qWoPz zD)=9-EbGvDCrH^Z($CLnu{|E}3$}P;S#SV*l+S4ystCUuX0&Y_62Knib6RHbmreV< zpFV&+%HIVffIsob`Zl3nzI^!Nk99A7^jlBeePa(Zzt5jI!E>ZJV`{J?S{l^LClALTS2O-2a@0zJT!O%2yM6tFDds zg6i=4>&NYQ&aK9+u%4^m`(~^Xx3GMjs=rUHw7e24Cn#?_UqEn_kPodcx^H-h<09@u#Zq@c7aF6GyWu-&t9o=}qC^ z?Zl}~cIQm?JrhLj$o_|j3%8Tm)ypl?W(cK(CqhntTkvKzbFI-yxD$9L+S`lBe;xz_ zC%^gmAujp(oss>=4jMIRczm0F{o_Xu8a+-nT(&zC`U^E!)xN}`L*J8SWEX#TitVn{ z<3w?dE!XatYQkT(D|C1B!$H7ld@%sGpyc0AM@F3MuFV#D_+R2%VMiLu1jyB!HB%kp zVWudFuLn=xUBt}={vdboPCeqoQp8V3zB9n%_XUKFto%l3etxhSe148g^_KAWLZh+! z!_rx^-=1J2`1~EU81S>(4mlK_nxC%%KeL;#-v)lq-*#q1xbpHTA0F=i;8ieJX&IT4 zTffrYbnwdTNp4WUzk`#@SK8|V|M}3+dQnMv>-WYlSZS}Jx`@YwL7jFR67%w9d(Ggr zZdCF8g5Z%p<$Ra`-kkvrx)s8>#afB4oDY-1Hyrq?U}0;%`7PgjiPFJ;r_a-*B60co z{_z<7EF1jn@~v+cjb%$jN%kn`L*v^b9=}fgqIfY=e*Mb%&;tIZD{ru;BW63;y=9W7IhBJ(@DxB|K6R~tFQYz zYV!56HxBu}8xvDfwCB_#VQ;IAq$T$tKF2w>hKQFH<;oBGrSm==OAucfwgV%m;FC`Bhp%gR-1^PD{i-@f)JXLu*O@3b#4fv!V1E+j+kMj0ZoF{p?-SGWa_q3L) z)fPfU+&IpR^LyC$t~XZK*nBkqKVE&BB&&$8??Tm!xG!%0s(9<}-kvP#v*Lce^Ebh} zc69I3AP1qydsA_qfA=%x^8;CGhY$AItEwgZ;@?ZXOfR)vBjHBiJRg?ncjA$(-wd4n zsokcNODoCSfb;t7r*9LM=_K5P_&LBUS$$LEU&v2U0HgTFE7{c z0nYt+QK7b(a{Vsgs@ftBUoHP6Iz+0UTH$?bo2DZ~smi zALYDd20!Qg@X`gnv6T5VZ`l>|Rs#55s><8Hv=)PCFZ{a$ZG2tdo-%Mqa2IgyZ{xbgwkjau>A<-^xx2>Bi;{2;a3236 ze?Iq}As1Kk`-AxV-60Di`W^ae%2mWyZHyK1QK^OhSDI_)%-Z&CI^$;G{Qd3>*J5gP3YtJxs7)v>C3;`1)Q&s&%Imd?Y`Bg z`)(L-OXH!M-{-{foxl2r8eOu^pND;F2jn@v2di{kH~QX|KNxob z=lI_KZ@$K2DT5H2(by4{(m}s425vp4(a8w+-%%k6P70_|Ng( zGUUOvtBL9jtltQ{2A%L8XH*ADUtYgyBK=>EueFD0A4~70H3@PNDsUU*d48s45Vgi>vwlS{&cT-`(F+eS6ssR0H|vfjq}|=izQi z#b1Z|9zpQ=-%$9^@%?bs(AUM^d+h5WUR+}Y&hhO~w_(kLrAnS){bt}CU+rbbsvdVs zUu4_{oa3AP&&35pE>F({u5kdbNhiF=@yv!#x9f~I>Hl(kV-epQj_FM_se}qV9r7IC zaf^mc36gLRaF*ZRqW3hdgsU0}|2e)|^N~V23Fq~X1?!)C-7Y-Qr2DG(*=L44uTOsM z_#z}o!fn9WzRmUD_(LnRWjVevz*A99ip*#cD%r>F$pZhT9B^8KB|IB)?0@Ocf4?dF&;D`ynDe^U zX4(Fjck{N7oKf4pk?pqt=l1bysR_em`xAikd_C{yQq^Vq48W67Ua_=r28w?&{9AhP zjU+k#8Ia@l@zb2?XJz}dfphz~_iw3Dvi%0L@Q>FE&CD~q$o8i~J_fwbO@rsl@y|ef zEx@}Zt*y`dhTi@f?810tL_13W?{>pk*8=SqnlXN-qf7?>L-**8%Kbvp@4xl&L&G%nEEMm*g=k+^ZPq@IZ^L%e;QA>V4+r!rr8Q`b9n0Kj| zIX|E6;p+)iGvV*2@ewEKyGv@xWwM{`;p>SQ@ZVi9;@4M4@chSQOK@Oid$!n7o*F{BQ z)~*w%(4Pi5uK(vV9}Jc2&s5a!IWgQW*PjEN$EnX_iZzky*G0Dw@!)Zy*ba|In`@sg z7C5gPZkG9KzD~lO&~F8=S#s0!!4l5(^EmJM=h9HQekbI3oSgRirXS?`(}43h)$eHX zB)R@X;F%~FOs{k{M5;d)_T>Oy+55YNdI>jRKa}HZ{d0aBIli2~*p?zroz^sXQ;x3{ z=Q+Mjdhb3b`#r6%%_Z>^(^L?K<+;_?Zze(j{D%!V^ z590HEA0B7*t%bkG`xI(N`!@0s$evj6_l7i4!MwGrcOBJ}J{s{GxV@28a~8jXi3IL~&kxxR4%tDyGi z2G0F?PSDXJa(l`G&h05HZp5$Lo=Cq3&rPuYLa$GKF6%e75&rqdgRWEZyhkk#IFI*V zyn0tHj|X<(JRXd{|M0v#9wY(h{+w=hJ=Qve1>|1}aPE)m{>ZqdlW;e19#2O0EBKb& zpR<7TcyMi<_JG_U_3!2F&ujKioF&Ik4|x-KE3@^B!%)9BX8-y9v3C7?#|tlfdCYy@ z0(x2<=sfvO^NjC^LwX`X<}w0*4~ie$a)kFize5xH`+ieRr@e7eCqqvv%C*C{&i}l@ z()z%)9-Q~;_8n(>&OV0!lDtmUR`~72cyoVJg{?Y=U=VHuo`~_H#QHrpIWA`4-0sRu z%5E&REC2VJW1-(z!m?0q7Y@jCyEt59Xc@U(q~JZY-0nt>9kN{Bzv6i)9eSQkh+iP@ zUwIVzNA&9UyS#s;YA5{XcGGgviYRIS%Kv+5BX|W0sfx(^`8-c>yS*2Cr>6$vBgM}K zIc|3cvs=UlNw^uf17&dXs!8&GzY6OtzMi~#e0mGDD>pyskmKw1wX-)L)krwU#{*vZ z@S;l40M3BeL>#(9qKtThwfkn8sV=W*lq4DAZJe%1SV^Z${q%Lj7( z>8u~T7i}AC4?+DjZzN-#!fl4*J)EK|SxtJ2XG!A-fpeAEbDgx=kcN0jl`z%_?-@%+lTehg!S_HZDx6tg|5a7m&b3G=k^_y zIi|fVuj(Y?V?^0CR&$=mXX?-9ssiWyn8AC;6kUtkInw3Jmk0T>fj7P1M-kjEeEqF~ zxQ~#Cak2?AU$`T;y|`eX zp|kL-&VfSZA|yNp=Xtznb6NE?QoEu!&LCLHF~(WpoGU^y^{gF%ZZWcyiXM`4HB{LF?OXn#sRWPA9!$pwCohUGl8 zKP4ZsJ$&7i0e<|P4W(#*NodIj2_QeHPv{j@)2 z#r25|^2sO(r~RoE>2I%{Au&fpKe4eP8v^B7FEkp0nN!VW$k3qIi{RZzH1BXE+XgU6d26|P69z4g;U@mKnl z1U(;LeHjzLuYCDR1^>4q#V3$o@-_7>;--E+4w4bQ-i!gdl%nmt2HxZX0 z2$}IW$AM1Mb7EGUr@v{OGvN2i(fHl&xc%W*SO?*03cTI!F9%DwHd7JrEvwyMl5RSD z@~AHpW%(!Zd$j`g;ZB^-LHXH};L)5LlIQ)QXshtA`k&2?1?S3ZleKyC-KlR(S-^Sf zw?cl&mq)q;sy`9IbSn2e|uC zr^bQmkN!~j|IzwtC*}H0h4R*aY5Z$WPoDT%A%FWoyLh>N{=Ii1@b-?g5pw;pIPXMh z={@aoNN)UfX|OvDc;$xcm+2)u7I-G`h8xzt2=(LM=WZ13CkH&DQ2zNoS~T=j(mYO( z{MW^H7ja?z3+`T-t(PvM52g%#<{!Px;15fLUvVSR%<9aTAIDWJ2pBp&WKf38> zE9Lr=7)Lp}_xm$s|FZ{+yt4cy{jW)~Jiout)JymuapY8GIX-%vk7K;*(K`Ga8uCw% zdhNgmIUgJfm;AS)-6a8^a4yOfA>rH~o#>B!cU3JZ*YAcLj|Z=|)p=KruM_$cA;0e2 zpjxtj`j3QP+@FfSwYA&->Q5%{iw-w;;&uRY^Yo`U@IG7nty{Jy1?`Z3ZyuMuD^1R~ z6LO3nzLYRj&UYg4G?W?luU(Y$$^J0@W6zcH_^spioCEpRiC?|Neo(%wh!e|SY#uUE zj#u=@=m#j%r+@ff9{-SU)^l^|_O^NKhaBrabT6T%tltXUiL&g$^wF|^++JD!lQ&x~ zljRe!pPmW%A%zQ%mD@`W&hvN@ao|P=*?%*B@6GZB5BDe_$@_orU$c1YHI(-{1uy@3 zedh9(^nY*s)K;5_4?h>xuzzyvX1C*iW;_u%KNq$1-+5hoj%araxW);5H=XbvYicEZ zwf<_{c>2FrzyJLnT>nq!8ukk59rF!vb*7^J5Bk2`lJamzUB+`1^}pGx|A-jPcc)o@ zbZ=olzvOzRuG8~cZ~y82#fq38Iey$<4(`3wECllpwI6=pKs4%kqk{W@+&&VapZ6_h zwfeqasF}3q)t`y$)T8R}>xIPR;!en?p`5;J%|Bu0Ts#x!`8u^gm612XB|NE*81K0K zjCy_EyBVG<&+R9=kBCEJkL-7){Oe+Ip4-oalaU{B`=RR%{@ryB?688r;q5^aBVY%r zqjkTZ&+j`(1i$vnL2pLFZ;2lq%X(3!fZs8@LCFF}W{Q&5{b|Sp&%c@A4{7pvPZaXT zQk1_~@b!I#|HU`Fd@jAOKo^Vi?7#8Z#W4Bz@>by7K7JbC=CJg8dH?$kxc#;ov+#Px z&ceQXTGW4>kmvr>bne3*JNAx$K{gVe2Aum({SMDs>lQ_o2d>Ekz8_AVxskD?`A3!h z0q%caHuvwGUU$pO`At-`p9yE1KMgesWfUK7|17^{&*!H(|GxP36LGVmd|I{Vy)a4M zjC~%K|E9}$d3~=-gq#y)_2G?1g+pF$FKJv4@~Q5>|7iqx!dlUv_-$K_ z9({jdFTYP=%E=oIxgAma$w54$A#Vb|_UqHhf!a?Z_;KK!O|Klz?=ztIB;q{3PvPsy z>O)1O@q^!|z~e{8rN8s6m(n25?W^e5-si9+c_;8pl)EpM9LDcEAb+@jvi=9JQMS19PnL1Y3F={rI$nUSy-RgfiH_ZI;Mmq&+D6L zzMg4t+$^`p6v#P&Cp}j!m)je!Z*nki?>p1gEstkekmq=nay|e3f30uy1BIWvso>$<7=t;_Aq(=W_uXlv~IBPcWP7z#f#S`PUz|J$Gk3V z2jQ8D^+`^tfA9_^*k^_;Ut$$p~AAzbCBi?h)JmFY}`la;3|LM+KT6)8JnwN;mk4 zBUA72xQ5XB_T8M|@%)$re&sTmIRVEv@J)k792$NZZI$OoE6(%$IPvS!qviQA5jf|s z=KE7-%JU=7UuR)tPyN=2L8mS+ravjZ{JjTmU-u?d_*xz>IKLeKAv*i=P@_;r@|<6m z@9^%2o8|tM1N)+f2>+^C4Qm3;Uo7AC)zMyZ{jrdKG2imZvq1TEf~OxU{NFHX^bvXfip6=J zzdGi$sT^qjvZ5cEk59WH_rFBQbN+92Z26l!e_4S$QQkh+{@pTvWw-^Mp1(=e;9|ESGxb4Dr&5E)ZXWYIF?-U-dP9#(?Y&H_@6(@ zf<5IQto;3#KBo>-O{9lo&L!&`6hBlLO?_#1T{ohaGzl7^@6#Mg^52XR5{-ky#Fc|_ctC_ z_~Q!4)aRckBvXmj?Xusi>R$K1FZL|Fb>V|D!$RK+l3f zGoL={(DWhYitMx^ewk>04W{-zr;ZVsB%IqT^G<|kxz$F2lO60cmz<+P@wtY0_4wP9 zV}yu%zqT1sol;l-Nt(R4HU;OsI(T$6t-ct+>ZR?0rWiUY4F`=B@HCc`Ab3l#TMM1 zEyph!{7?O}!%fpNM){KDbn^NqOSO{*M;%Ic!jC?{4Y=JDF1i2KHXM&F3mhIQ$yc=bxu6dsOQAzAS@c1uN zJM#N+DZV@}@q15xp4hgQ2K`)qf4Cib^kdK;P)6Ug$I$wo`zPg%h!Ko>pxkJ=57D`!!fU?f!}Cb*r(jXzza2O~$2Q>TmZoz3Nx=CzwutV*i=_H>DZqJr9nk!@gW6pCbSB_#l6*pVMRe-V5ooQnpV&PWa9C)qOFwzigigIFI8G>pZ_E+ZP9%*8@LH96D6C&kmf& znW;DbxGme41-p~LbN3m0G+45qpR-N@KCA4vb@{vH-kkjB^Y?L0`}LFZl)L_go~wV> zIJ|C6!(`(8FFkgJ9>aJMuNahHtRHn{?~B-lq=%lH;da9J!|A-YoocP%C!%!B(-b0% z4r<5AtQYOE{+%=ZSQp``3cR%bVmDsv6P}^K_nunxHm|w7dYC zyT)nZx&F?nuKz-T_oaZ`Rr5=qy6+U|$z_U@#U0yp+{IU^0!$jflp}44v zymlpjVsM_nySU=|{#)`qow;9(6WkB3M7zGs(~cpZfU=N9LW&O#(o88(pUN7|n z9;Y~-`dufS>?_5y0G#DA5`R-XI}aM)zr%pskb3L$=QkVm&G`76`5_1Q~<|@;4Ro4)EOeht)zQf8FS(F5o$% zk8}+K?wxP*{SGc2yz(&uZRhlM`QN5X~vb}1kE zo`<$Tes71DO#|e^|9mayBLVz{D?ZN&kPrX!wVV$Z_&3{jE)XCe!ODDOfPX3Vox%a~ z5vVl?Dxa6+eF@@w+eyCtGs_T>=j7*`Yw&drap@qtl=|pAJr}C~RK&}K zlHVU_#ouy!qvt{saGvD7?MtIVzu|`|pH@?aBxk*QL5Y{66W(L#NwZ~c{f<59|J2_3 zJ(H<;k0Xzhi{kd&4l)xf_aJ@-+lhL!@ptt*@14;G=&z{?zHzGXSGT;`6P@w@-(M}@ zzqztnHr;=d;}NL8I>7Jz`r`|9y(sf3ucmO3CqADFK6&Ylr#1!89h>nyOlrn&JqV+N z`m^dYVLz`s&sBV|Uv0_7jlg-`nelCvVwU;gxV5O_kHsLu?2Hk7m9 z$(*H?^zr)|`27()&+Zu5>;SJPSs&HU?`z=qN2EgUiPzJ5=xodsCGq)v4g7q*2mIQ{ zjQxWH*qaR8@VSUnnRdPUgn&o!GvhqZZ;j5j>Y$hW;rMWSw1K~A{iS%m-^NyweaiOe z0RMJ(jh3$074t{1vOT7P|6{XO{pfy+lCPXUJm6nA;wThh$lJci9_91mhG`-W#-qtD zT3c|tBOhp7P_{=pPve3I?a~Z+wkrXD%X(;BNWyuN_q9`8-*G!#eXh&jayxZ{&+YWL z6CH+2?KIyyAq)I5gE|!rGE*(Nhu3faI)Q&@q5neo-DJ|21!-K6590GWfq!Qa3x4{% zm2GHTkPqT3^I!*m+qlUC|1aZ$6a1Qgbn6#rT!>SQ3vTeq4vHsV4{|(PWtCFN@r<4> z{N;FdN&KJ>$CKn^f%ElXKfCKP_jkgrzZE>St}5#1 z@x%$fZcf3-V6z-eF@N#8j`NiU{$F1m{WK(hzWnP5&Q})rjsm8}dSib5%6vs93HusH z7J9_@aabx)zlj6?$-=}IVN66x{YIHDf~eo*Aa99~=YErdzm@$a9p_1&<_G0_ROEIL ztMXpC%n*Jg>+;Scd`-i9l%$UjZ~qK7LXOUPZTQdYN`4S(<>mHG)?(bZ3NoUC8@S{QSU(whc^PKYR!2w?p33LBx4XnbJ@BI>|R4z`i)} zl28^Xd$Jtog6$=~p|#MXvWPMT{HmE%{#CBms2w;J<3T3)q?7F9@qq2Gu)Oe1*?!ZP z!f&>JW7woUY(L4z0q5`k_0^`vb6fTK51hw?ugAarv(_j)B0LE=j|WvUU4QVnN&U%* z`0#j;0)FWJj2Sdu$_Me4@o|G6+;p!0xqX(Q{-=x&VZQY&iZ!h+YW5gx%bMJoT?GFyfA3I%U$LXj(RY?!Uhwpdtc-$eZ{9Uz~P~;E4mtuT> zrFWLgcoy{Xc>TkwM(s3ak{0rA;QHCZuRhyO{t{&N!M^%gp7R$xzFi%Sgqt82hw^;O zFSE1~ZpV4f@4BkhLUj_Ji0`c=f!A>1-!>lS$$z$w_1Ahnwvue08*+M-TP9{`<@&P} z_0N1Y<_Ed{6qcVO{I6#|_FD+-qyCnH`0(!xP2jy8T=uCx|NIhS#XfT~-VYxKe#M?Y z%?dTD@*Jc;4exo(-YMEwBKR%)_cZf;T^1s~a$S}Jew9nz!e~!T&17#${Xa+9|G_7k zm;0aJQ5in+UZU<9) z4bTOd1%vPe$S0%R(5KiUIgfFQJg!om>L|;nLM{Vky{XqDInOjMDD#*NUTinV)8PDh z3|8jRkSzRuIbha`5F>jgO46^)qZ$1BgC17U2N{hFv`5Qvq#9_PQs$A) zQ-1aE!v*;al!SZ7B~6y}x35112|sweUbp|ZWjsa^9z9Rs3HV;?2bq5k4<=>agK#It zn^^FEoD;s1*9yKoqCH!Ie`#!YlJ}YkPsDlt-s975hb!}*H2GsyypPBUKG)CB%d-AM z(M|Wu`ZE>!qrTZuH&?%ReTv`T#e!EMSU*L!KYG6KpWA8osB!-MQJ(pEBc3l~!Ef=( z+rNEL%KeA@U)!+6EXbq%t={Jg9idfvU> zFqrKidHy|X>Si&%^z@|0$?F&W0^zUwErGAKmA)YB&w^ePcpK8rzLxFJj>_Af_MHpv zC$}d%eI$Mo@XDd@7o^t#z(DRDD3C^mj@d(P1`RDKJW`g(Sf$3}YMqw=B`bBx$`*qiZlu!vbF+Ne)XS#c{QW$XR4}8C# zzpony{?pB4u7(E~_jsJ-@9WyZe=uQw*9c*j|6j5%3wd{f*KF32lfLA6S%kZBJ{8Yh zW#4+%hwp*-aL8wY*Dms{N_>Bx@D#Lf{bCV^IcxV1V6zF&!8l<8K3&ydKke7j;gkPV z#D&MRFArIq@_1s09Dl!d(8k$4r1q&x_)N(2_ka&Im^VmXKc_(6Sz6e4|4QepQvcQ} zzgIYO?5DmxQMS(w`7D%=PT!g#_unL(*MBASw|?jGRdC4LDO>vBEF6!s+S3LjXuW$4YV*9T1{qI}i``AhNp2knZAJow} zd^G<*q>tZ!m4SMW^$Hym1Rmikr>KwjLH_*Z@fxj!8-eq>w^;c*t#lI3FUrN=+TRb6^ry8H_NN0c(P>{#ju-it z3co$TqrPx{5ej)4ca;0BswG0-UrV>v=leP;9K=`dw;I8Jv*%%FxQ&^jB))RL)dK$B z0g)R5+~4ur!|&^Lfd6f|m(K&--|^eS@9Rwkf8ykIzWZ&mMY27-@8bb~^7Y8Ibbm)a zh_BrDF?=oJ^Y6eSX9C>c$+s>yga6jVVFzfupt*++TIVDx);S5_6NmE0?{(zsD5e|Ug%|5`Y?`C&PJ9**}i5r=AFUt9~5>@&6%=ed8KRsU8|mN!F=^V4g0 zd?6|R{_%&u^Z3iQhpHf#%6ItU+f2Rw9`XD4 zJm5DxT2aS&Q{kZe@cZ`+--tMMyjOdq+&)xjA7+fNiLob#$?ekyIT!Gc4(u)?w@-5| zp_k*gr*O?9T8A*eS3l&r{r+XJx69K%AfFCikg9TLS-%74Jt!|u9&DD|FTY=o=f{87 zUEePEU*ig4ANSvjW5Nf@_Hp}S`#aRS(OJ%~4f34d34^<9b*^0hIKK|??q6s;C{TWr z>j*ns;JIts4+hFF&rj@6I{3RP{_!$Ue$BwMQH~tC#USUG zMrtM81Dx|$?oL!4os6UXs=gI|bf{moxBPxQmgn~O@S>@_EN_II8D+^mdy9oYzqfw| z^ZJ70X9I7nb9ohRhawtczO%tz2Y7c2Onao?qerR8{MK+b`F(cxLf z0J%S=0?$Udtb4~Za=r~KMI6}Qj^XWhg-iK1!oC>rOlS2CBP85{^V}aE3@U#rQo>be zX9?h)IJ)Xs0SPywpC$vZb+^TqC<#x+dG1eN@9A>cAmKJ1@4?HuxcZL#emo=aY~Wpv zW)?35c{yKv|J|@k#G}QCeYV00syqkrxxexK_ZaXubv+tf#FmHd-A~Vd|J??D<3VjI z1$sXow;x^)CWHTA)sqFq%=z`RJ-i-F2Y=6-<4Xj3KOWBqydKO3zuvSR|NLLxk7ryh z;$vxh+4z5XKb{5r-%C_$N6&eyB^T&AO1T~+nAV9dtWzA2Pen;MT}Qd4zrAtxKL^9# zdFStp2m0KK8Oz6`t%tQO`DWlZ1%=Wn~C?e#aT7CYmyM#AHOb6z^F+WLJEaIZi4o(pv2dCCpXimL-W zPvL(qkl(wR1pUuPm!6`t3A^}T($DROpX*5jKYG))xq+VRu>;RSx&74sLLrhr(J3Mx z+`b;qNolH={86^ASnvl%Tptn^$Cinb>{GTcEBGt33|qou^YfMMD+&C{K^3M1XkYoB zLrep|uTFg`K>Nz~Tu&DG(^Ir3mFRq2E`5+`$Wz|Cy#eS{t~|Ra@xg_iKM;Uo@E4ebi4}(8uqePsiUCEq^`Wbpuq> z{F84S^MHRQv;Iih?~v^!K96JE4h`#sJ>QPIcPiYLpRa6(X7ERsePE#d4yArG{O9}H z3E+?2d#MlYcPRO64?pMP0{`OQ6ZX;btV%xH!}D7P_!~YbtBNw_=PSo4)epkoKTDkd z=l`*Lfb)8LF?@tL2UO|9P6cUy+=Y{;{J)hxT39-i5B6w4bn z2>;o?Ep;as3=S=770O>KaE@P_$IIUOXZeO! ztUm*Ibvofaw%cZv-_g2a1^Pe5&w}4oas2)a>3CCw&!+Ovy9Y@)-%m)r zBk~Zx@AbT(bf37;4|yJ+tkq`s(n@#&a2`MQEdBMQPR4QHJQ=)uts1TfmTb$De=xh^`=CAEyG(Mj8K6$y*_ke*gC`H;FiCpYJ}Xm+%;z=kHG@#&)_K zD&c%zp6&13e~u|w!V@6R^)DX0VX<64e}9tWTmS1}eg92@dbwl5jDVYBdm*uELP^Z1YRJigxltJitie+%R-;GG_KYg`!o zr*&X9+Gh;np8#IZ1AkWzPgUhPh@Xo7YJgla__tKCZ$-HB(0$j}85rOE-+u&ui}mU6 zJkPKc^@nWC7un$5&iQn;{QXDe`pURP#AV*dtrp%lV0~n-ay?@PKV)^Lk@gSNO!k(< z=k*M)uM)tY)9K$Uw11%F^LmEY`7ZDu*1gg((Dxse_GEzH(Q~>e?H?%hvpu}NQf(Ff z9&5Z~c%bh;vOT=MiUHrYr~Vq+KTzsduCHw1Z+`#oZ~vG5gJkfpd_D14p#1~o`pO$- z6u*6Q~gGi9HMPx?(*w=ov0(8v4q{CpdK zS28sG_*)tSX~{i&?LzUpwIt{p7I(6GP%hQ?Ke|3q)=vOEziEeD8cLSU!ryE!@#*?R zwf%p`A-0CVS6&+3RO6MA8(+_t)%OC+04EqYv3fcq(w7|3YV+OX&aNr5m^=19%jj@E&W9EKGGZo%##?pW>Pg zob$lXk36b#?8*Nn4~8AW|AoDqW>PF=|9$&c3jamDT2%t-HA9|%7nXp(Wj&OKB%CLC zFZL{${^LEk)QLY;-Y=r{<7-EX59@J5{-@ZOkm-@jwL~X9{LBQGzJ-Ms>pMJtbpOQB ztjecd)@Mi)e)k;p_>T{_>h`fdzBu8Mu6gL-=ib}&>mNUQ(CBfpVp*>ZdUqDs+_YB5 zN4{kX*~#scOKNL$^!Kfl#Q$YIY0$IFVLjV%a*yuB@Zvg0M`1V5hy5B1pCI2qQ0){r zuNUfmv9Xsn*{@$`1kUTB&%xKuVV&p#=k2fy0uHOMUo{w*x zEc(7&zY93ew};=!&hvd98}M|LmA{Iu&G#S3e}h@{H@?5R)0)~=?aK8p8tVwvE)j=> zA6mcENVpN_dA-==`w~ThB-{*~<%?CX5~`JO8*q-_&9b{wbuxZK*vI-0o-4gho2v31 zWWNjYX7G*_t5ZuS;pqzf7e){MI~X{PJ?00(UmJM5PTp}Qer{+0z6b5vgZw5#F1q}* zI(%KuwUB-%_`IKz4*u#XSciyx*!|;jGPDBh=lz7Y>X?JxF2ZTBjQtR z*$-nQZTb1i^@jy~3;V$5Oz4!6sZTcVyPY2H9$MTHj_2u!y1DwbI#uF!2kjD=jaMgYhhmK?SH4T>R zH{v|o|7FakcS0oG44nOc5x>HrmvFY9=a)ZwerA>JcR-%U$4$duy_D^D0q6N++KS8d z^4JeN9p%8Vt-C^V>({Dqzu0nBw1el@e{L(XC+0_0y6~IVw|33Gx!gu6KSto}|2N%= zb(QnuLA_@1X6{JK3d^nEFVFEQmGa#kd491$&Vlku__*cakoVg0pWhL-_aE``@Btso z%K_>y{`F5f^tF3@`aq+u+oqGx)E}~Oo_`1T{D;Li^27uChU~BB^8=^k_8N0Q#EboT zJm1t^j)wub1!a{TEw9M=PQZB;;#Pg~ncX~JQM{9Zb3U&xx&4&q9l}$A^Lk-pW>hV` z)E`{%F9W=;>)XXfNcqUdd0tO+c|CVbq=b7go)``aKXqMfs|o=3&KJST`6~vzPpWuM zMWt{gMM-?+{AB^(y}aHWgEK#0Ie$68j~Y<_e!--?J&tE)dP)6yx z(}i{v19@J@+wix{r|X?WoF{oN_Mg`&Bl{-|A33^zKjQHr_xm*H*--fSsy}|{>w6U( zt#h()o`0{x*WYz3Y?>_@4~2KhPQS#+mdh^Wp@5+q~LG=$cUWfz}mSitA7}_+$x@?bOYbe_LtZCOTz_H+`%3;N z6%aU|+iUHAJ&*rK^ZH*n`PUP9{0GkdS87(fL>~Wvv;Uzf))%t>(ZHQ33-lgZQT9I( z=Q%#wV=Feu@@cFe<%ydod&u$0L0ocxmmab2R0!fn?Tz=VqTRyJbccwC`Sptz0iIt8 zR`#!0mV5lZz( z=Y@RkcRhI=;p>_~JKfuYjKs=4C{Id1Q=xBPo7exR?|OQ`ALCBxO?yhReKd~5DEfin zxbTatpznGr-LYbmd=S9T zeECa&z8Yntb>yd9ALU!=rwjbC@dM8W%Aax^%aH7q^T+#%oWFVB|6A&R<J?MHvZS%oC z+z6cK`B(b~_ti+a892{#L)X3K3X*UeaGvLS+Q**OO1J|!&tnCb?Hj2BPVJq47wQ5p zZh*)~*;{W$2ZN`=L3|J5;Gef3clw8^djiZ``PPNm;Kz(={UE@+m2X{WJR{B zfO#w5y3hiCqk}Vk2rzHu8xI`d|GI7bqX6?(zVRRx{P>w~E>O-}zICBuJokW4A*A-e z{h#v@^3AoM)J8(ZIIGM@Oos4(W&3lL1LPxEnGXy24eHGt5Fj7<))5ZyqnjH(4Ums~ z>xfkF7uA0?B|tv%ts^|(*NLlKBS1d#jbnzh!r!dNIo1IA$hVF#ga7vAkKa?~!?%u5 zLBy5V``G@&mSFGnZ5NA`xfb7p_q z%}4i*1DLnDANTxz`*^k4NAdWc_u~k|@{cqUo`m-Y#({UB$B++$fK$KJ<2=6? z)Q-QSnzk{}^RGNkQ;o#Wf`80U0zc-P&_+6Ae!g-Ylm`C(Ie$$H&c9yB*Ke}G-@dr^ zk`OXNIw&8?_g_b!7x5sPH-2h6{O9ijpZew8*S5F6T@GCP{}{XSz^01lpWfjvAX+)2 zfQCDWXh4A=hXqusTtxv>N+FdVfffiVQ1GB2N>R}&3RP4Js8j)sidaOUqDa-RTI4V) zYP}1H6hZjC$$mcR=C%6c{n72)`ONIh?Ck9ByW#p!Rp?&>gU9_a8y<*_YfjjroqbuTo6M0tnn{j6OT-pD`l0RM6+Ho0c zj!PTx-)$V%zMidCT-M4TNx(k)HY3PkoHiLko_ z{2X5aoHI@YFYBOc)XTZ_6Z_v+s^;4rH~rQ#)+ z{>XSv!u^?K;FE!`zdCR5$@hWIJg_5g%A6R` zWnA+80`_Mi@UiPpUHM<{7qCD5z~9>Q=MMk%egXTl68Ie#7W`R9f7Tku3Hz0Q-r4-# zt9A5et#OEzW7*9C9W-BDLc3?=k>7j-LKlff4=+GB;fyTzglLRpYni*zMltbRji{HJsj{SA5ezP1<@+Z6(TN-1C*8MI0X4Y3)mwqcjI}Y&k zc^@~+KGX}pF@8epIsVp3!|qp{E?=MQG1J>fg>l4BOS)#@vY-6&zw|5f8`l%; z*W22?wkgUbsG39Y71R^!m};DFX|lDduJxJUgts45ehS$BdhC4GXUV{Sw5P>$vOd%O zA^MoFbL0bmvUS!+vOd%Ck`K-68b9!2rQ}1t|HbuJ&Vt_8(gTvOtcR5T%!mIRn9xOE z_t-&aKJ1e7-S=GgNSx8%{H`wj?by*RwEofCON2ZR%Cx}m4^L@8p;)hXr zN`mO?#P2NdzW4)|F26iNqgOyK?~5-?>-tHgMz02)`~E(GaZ$Sbgu~(f81Ph!v(XyA zAN)?>qCR-GV~j>mMm_U;--9Dt$7=MXyOn$&aL<(7-#SjCJ3uc4{Y?AkPV#+evEPsS zym?B_$E!YkyB_$ZKg{>-Du7=&|K;c8JtzGTJn!4_IoxXCA9D2?-@vV-gX62#`*!xP zl^$2+xVFlBPWmDG7Q$c2z#TjN(fCHd2|XY6oG-r~w7@6N$H<|_7sqok@bxcwsJw|Q z2n+oYym>sA0e{ElcSp-}F`P$)N$}?JTn+rYXCJ+(sjW8NoLB7uW&hOc=FgPhan;9X z(7&eVS(Aa!E$DivxuJuO5AKUi^MKORc;61=Iv@PB!;f=aj^x#H)C<4l2}itI&l2}< z&*`!sc%QIOanvIbhF$tmmtBr;lplKC{cGs^u;dZD%KgEU=EKIA;x zMM^&N)|f66!k(ur2Oslzs}7BiL>H*Wgue=O=JCBVBM!%C^uP!u zKmI#a=9eV@p+C>b_POpom6p3FO5;xgAM;+~0o&Vp`(Dr)Uk|?F=%Kgo0KEX^j|&eQ zH{+E4M!bdY%klY>f__TR`M$7i_KVTzF3{=ED=SMz#%gr7Pd%$Qef&UVsnSr|&!hZdYFtiT@LNfgMlS-L z{6Ab&^l-FBFEzEFdu`^%7|_LE)we0R0pR#tPf@4pow2}Ka0ov6R)u#1Z~0#Nr|gjP z8$O4l-kUMBL}zmUtQ0CCSg9}KHdwwIK>zr(Is&zzPOL?*?L8qzK<`Z zKI0XxSD*WS(VyQ8fX=ud_}8jS_2)M&mC7FGlm2h{AJ(7WwBh?bj=`$mB{axT^{+n`m>3&^*H|U%% zww!E|AErO(c_{DPbpLVf`OTOj)VoTRp40zYmZU#lSxSD;r}m!q7oVRL|Hto8e0+ZX zNy{-eKz}vx}HZY0`B-fTTayZJRtEBbxK63;0&Mrr%K4^N8kr>IHt`ibq=2^*o|EpB4c>WK+wrbv=)0 z&Zp(TAGl_8|1=0lkmIp7q4?A;@s?4H|m97@<(#6YM<9j{v6k~h&)F5ult6{v!+Z-%M~fg zU*su;{7qZ-_q%;X&v`-@IqYwi?6Vt&2tpm=cgnH;q3o$x`TCphtf&ZnAK|~`WTa7w z(#HY*B$SzrZ+$UwLw*otv=i+^J%2ZJY0n8^_u&dbr(YU$x_K~l6FusqIhNd~$?sg= zFr?-;E(NCBRROu5^>B3`m)0j8^k{39vX^Zf?mFTZG$H&ke(>3W^S1igMjsmE#lrT5 zC&3a?&jVb}ZflG#Cx3_PZy)F_C%wO%a-<#CyW#Xr?YH@jfqzPq4Rsj@kim0!yiS*YIMpcfA66;^^XEw{J{OU zNEAPKA!o$gt@l8Upg-w{JkXo(*pywDA4s1+;LPT*p8_dLRw(EaKG zJ=d3%%GfpR`q%s0S!~284LPClSqwR225lSp;_*dG1txjA9QD+j*Kb^(I&Y!>C{py| z_bjTwxALc*9`=Ly!7Pt)(P(?$NxX)k%d;I6I30Z;jB_rI{DM!qp#yM*WW?>ZdX#z}=rfg;W2%UL_{Kw*&%-8c)G59#1b6_DVNf(q48$@OZjE@@`pU@ zFCB0({2uK>J$*Sf`kLn`LhN#b?txxET{k`S`&^uUYH;wLl=y|RS<*kMvy_KLP9gaH zDC6A&Un*P`eVBd;pq}mB{==dS#jVDTrCQm|{`qxUgW+sT?6!eUyQjABe@mT&?!)h@ zx`5l;&2e1MPj1xncRwPRrH-L*gx`VpTl0W>?v+6=(uYDXLcRZ5l}A3i&e@4MLFkFF zuN1gD#@efR?OW)T=+6M?M-Ckd&Cx<h?2k7#DB-^zAKr+_+9D|8ZO% zJ&;$W$BhkiH_G1~Mdx(?S)do&AK0wp+j{#&CjNE@2fw28)BmNw-ThBaJKg^Q)YJc$ z-@CAHUH-THt?cN3ZudjF|81zJ|1X)bDC~D<@*v*@+~i?LSLyz@P=C^f=gsYxTe@pj2e@`O-{@D9ZT%-G! zd6)b%Ml`!i?_b;L@c!L=?Tf+pBrv{WETFqkZtnKu*X$n|$MiKz_KoqqjcGH7&eE4R zVoxY9b%> z^jE?^%09-;_t8CH(c{JmI{W>CgqQBn?Mnuo`gdCT=m7rynb^m?L;g|qE$`{_nRjTP zXLz&s^tkjxKJ(6n&#kV||KK|2Gou7Hf z3Eb9R%QN);OGZ8OPG{$~sT>1hKl8p1xcuplCh2*n5cSMEyANHsUC;Z~(8~{;)qm<^ zJ@5EvKj^QOAI)l16F;H#1o!9fZrI)7quGzGlo*isNjRtMFU0SYe0cGje|2yDSvly@ zPS81qZhkalz8*ixpmV)3t>W!`t^XpEuTb;ZZ~Nc+M`Xm_zkkx|ho65F@*@h_K5!9t zE&L>U=;Rwn_k+&sKXc==daUbmZ!iQ5{Ua+tKMtifPyTgAtCO!>0{+PIUg7OO-lqEF zo-4+FO!*0x#LTeUiEY)(8JoptMFRdlyZf)3%|Fl2sX;KhU3?Kb*i%y5os-jyrORe|^Av zfNM2>XmsP6@flNydiLM^P080c(dd5A+5fkdzw^C(pH~ivza(dPeCKvO^7##0*1ZgR zL^b#s-**jr%Cg73KY{dwC}l6>`?leWmwffd9aWU?1pTB`7)PLcRK_byZ~Z|27yB4r zjNheg-`%O_XQ!!uFFDeoahy%K6+h#L{I9<^;&q+B5bgU>4qJHb#a3I8UD^-juZlj( z4<>`uMzc-VTzj(W!9*oB|Z(*2PLI{kIV z@mG7jzdWEbUSD}FwS#_Lu^8>=1NTvvr@L^R$@of!zkMi+f$Q|;#+&OJUlklbz}apn ze4%O0_=wkH8Q}z--?{DDch1Mz zFaB>Y=#j~wbAC&ieDFS>?~dom?*pCV@7p75TR#29(ct5*(w~K(bNu~Y@u0WUu5F?3 z5c@$7Dr5*fb!)%IFOOW|WBZ){PD_Px9KNT|!G4=sFO~ld`H@ce@gJ!$j=PU%?x?;r z^HcfXh>=t5JC^M0oLQ->ilb`d8u7WWs%UC59s%tAJ#0__4R>|`CyNC$w*z_WY7yyF8tpexeXy-@<9Un zvlOKtxQ7Q!pVk9qk-=794P6I_f-C7{_J*T;vBtyJ>bhn`N@!_Wz9AIgno*j>#-}Yxc*gr zJyr%j`g6@~H`#eVBN#uRSE9W1wo^+lfPAMV+M3rRTz)n86%CZ#oo{+NyM@Va;R`*_ zh5dB}_LX+vjtQa7< zE>P<_zELmN_iea-QU<z8-05sO*z-@e`ld^9@q_pCi`CzKzNgs-io9=kqv@ zum6aT&J(JlCxOoA;2+!FyLU`pkQ|in1)bygW7v3AA(UU;u^FpJ?racm?(Y>H^-|+DlU#7)@Zp1}g@?m9v0rV^Y{^ZpiwpfE# zft0QCSMc$`mmN}kCBWCqo7b{lehrrR1mK7d0RQc=361LqXU`fQk#8NNr}uGKiqtK!{pj{p9${;zV-N@U5yfJT7tX#e0(na4CBQTOruS+vDblU_Odr2Vc$MHpZBT) zKgY*_$oJ+)m(=h((LSHYyX2Q2nnikR=<)H&9}bi`6K0LnpJz)#J@wzyy>|=!c`}Y) z%MleWegXKM;}v~W>de0*HF^o?e4Z~QW6qON8oeBJ=7+<-yi^vg(W^jb z{&{WD<6B}hdVEu5AM?Yq=P$WDR--#W=Q`t(IlZlMpzGt;i*}NLzh_PBLTj0_lYjN` zRgQk~0zadfD_))hj3C%34ScM5yc7X{`iX{P>lcUPB_2w@Remf7?#EL%j&5M!<`-QCE)B3h%Df{*b!@AhXuh}7tA z@aLf%e0=Pr7>!p7A;=BRefxqfZ|EENNii!IHb ze@F9o+qj;5X+q{T`g+oGk+O&SW;OoKrq4$<&>7#)?C$ffJ|DRdKeT7>g23>w_y<47 z*F{^C{t1hJQ~P)Kd917MuOiSXzvrfkeY(H69-_ZWfxog_UV2^ra)BN|X&-vi&6>Yr z;uFIA_i%B$m+IH}GbSG2KcGEcg@_V#KuL7O?j+4(l9;4CY zFIM)G-&=i|Csv~;;W{Jfo%(F~G}58jZ{nXgF6Lkq=#qc3MJe#ZFYlgMKP-Ew^%URx^&&2+fREYRdTE0ydPz^KN}A_-N1D^*T1@{G2iNk;F!M zbN#(?d*j2cG`gj2`1tPQtnAfVquW5Ie;#i=_=`3g-32=B@Bi?WlWjrQ?dSCjH}KQi zzjLr%q0*Co1#iBdkq7(>8`=-D%mZg;N`M>yTI*&-t7Bc!AGL_-%VfXKlRsdPWiO zJ-%_@e3`vA-h4fy9QeIc@A>uegxYxX^$d$m**l_3-*I+pI9{$h^7ke5nMmFXDZqZ# z0sbg-g&XHO-nb4K;X}Q^48OE$w1B@>|MdrkNkZqKjgj9?a+EY zpReQ1eyIe0?L|>9$#rR6Ke=w>F+C@pa0%kTz{)stc2atBoLo8ENYpOXqR>6SbKUUX zX6IFr8a*F$j-xleA2~1zbg_@`9~D#1^J<=pYkahEG;kIif-kZueb`iJ!NUUw&#;LZL{2EN(fv(k;Q3iG$b zmD%4SOX4aKdgX(^Xq2+kk8{1>B(BO)ulQ@n3FGS0N4LBb884`sL;PsgJHEZL^K#$R z7bK?j_9RaHrZ{l{FH$8A_`Vb8lfX^CJ0fgCRdiRGvWN83&z*cR#n+G4z z)|avDck-75|7`gOh0(TPGoe4CPXXvvC=5i z`)}PqN!W5^K zzzZa3|7R+{(Eh&Lqa$d)L65dKP;nXonK=c+o!H(H}tfX;C;;_LTgVnCNTRZ=1ECc>nVBn_>2t+C4&>Rm!l5v;-yQ{&^IJMiAAK3qbmvQJq zy_}2R;_=>W0)B7dbi}?#C`01V-Yh(h@=W{{*(wgJ$EotG8QGI!M7VK?{8Hc(yo$c% z+onZ~cd^SXU--nXBJc%RrYk)xo$9tL0rjfgC`%&r=6xLh3#xrZH|G0w>YVZS&e^TQ z!@hqAd5quKXS_#ZjP;}((tqW+&Qgqdz7Y6zlVYv^_5H*6mdXx4@M$;A-tu4HKdgRE z=~)SUgEs5p&g=V!ot2*gFZr|1>-&emFMFYP&&GAEBk4~)o}{0Wp_dQ*jGbbf>v)O3 zQq;qbp>+`R4CniOSN%9U!X>Dh!|;1t{PoIz{Enohi?Vb6s8Po_&yqv%Tz7_k{}%W; zUAr_k&$og%=XE#m8(uqir#!!^+aq}M`lA5&-t}&}N1lJs@iLwYP2;H)c+okS$FNRi zUjArrc>_H!$9GlsGVfmNjOn1~We4bt>ly1m{6Npke1A3xxYPD?ef7NTZmayuxW97z z!VWq=+b;nBmoo=1)A>tG?VnwG`f=uUv5)PS1Gl?);)+;pUhuUKZ$Be-^uDn6yD9r= z-@*+Gp4Qv1f?Nl1t6NUEK2DSG1w9G$m1ldtV%6pyuFn{cUf?>fcYFCfk``aF=6Eas zzRmRxXIiQqZT2)W1ncoA z`PUqe(zcB2D#T?H__@Bz!?`X;#&sd;h2QAs$b5XSh~LM&&QW^und|{am3-rSmcS<= zkMerp$*J4FkFp7>=BR62R)aq-!PPaowjXMZOM4IHhj*L&^Owv|y8bdQ{ibo547_Mz zv>$r^hWhfmrf;u!wOt+h)>;n~L*CKnd$y}X-&*}v0sLL-ep+qTH@Gf0>8tdNw&a7) z>QMIbdk;>W>vl`OC81vUWqk7YAbCA1&ryF$gj=YJUI0Av)4TB}W< z+j-0b797F+jqA}|XC?u^|H#zm_?)GV=k;X=)=hc9Z;j}CX*~y#sucMg@BA)g`E@G4 zJ@Lg#Z&Pde?_P7A5Pya8%Tr%YIn%%%9_ONuIiI+IPj6D+ z->~-erds333w+;-Q8OEv)(J9>_#IcSyNZApOO5tJ-|?*2ul$gYb=d9u9$3hEf?g3k z{mt);S3%x)AMY+P?*jyH_Mfen^2dgA&rPVqf3a2ll^*n867W0Q9&9iE(+`nv_Fo?G zzi%tqBmUEmpuKp`Dj8)7@Goudd4c#(Kg56e^^`tbBL{#NoQ(VUE0sMF8e^jI)y8u8 z#ruZhmz*I7aa@to3Ik`lB73K#o@KwN%wXST)bp!E|zxZ8qTW{s3KX*6$ zCl2d&p(ml9`DclJ|0ru6>w13I+zb2;f4#x~wXWxSv;g?-PZXc}uXR1YYhDWc!~O5d zJ)d=b74RKax9NL6>w4Q&$`AYB>Gx(`>w5Mt<3xNJ+<(E(N#JMPJJMU%Iz6$u zif7vC0baC_IN~}sFHzxUXTA0Y=NF;7Q6Ip1-g8$}F5^|`e#ompxuo94`CNwzo!8Sw6&)81-qV065}ZajEdb4VUE_m5B| zZVTbBYRI$qQGRiv43}%He^9UZYyUnR$MrjNu1Kw8omVRk3n1_EcRLTMW1UxPJ}m`) zbnCB!?+5GpN&YP`#bK4Eum1aR9G_e_t?t!yd4%CO*j4NI{ak&OU$&RrZLPzuTJxL- z_&1IY>??NZM_v6{2>j+>Z%okpPWYt%%yvn=^q&oUWhiM^HO_VaNZyIRM%f|!2JK(p z3(8H;OcRV8#`p@o$Dag#r?>c{f^nz${%+{H7=MrU`EPF@!?tDo`M}40OCiqR{NcKL zB2_b?ztWEZQ$PAOy@UB6PR)m$mj*XH_%QRH(5=@hJNbUb-lPjp^FDyk3-La^9k@S7 zT=zh%O{pOL!+kC7Nd#`+*rMDxQ-6xQipx}9^8n{vm^Oy*$BVpL_5*j|s`oD9d*pP0 z^tai5p-F#N!ViA%2XLLQ66f@};HAGU{c8GK{A&KaKmS)sZ^1h)F%}o_=HCruOmdwi zcpgSOv2Ig4jtj!)0~@}_AUxu)0-QUt74FvYyJ8u;LN9|nXQrY*`NM5}qtT$yD?u;I zQ1qqub-Z5YF*(HFemwud{XC_zMZN#bcCr6l zT>b^pkCaiCuKgK@Y_<(Ue^(_PIzeJ0W+R7Lj!&pdQ&RI6oCt{^$c@4@}u z0^pAPIQ{Qvjb4I!`g#1B7jKEt=)Tq}zRQ8TVC)UlsK7f<9;K%`4*|U-CZlDE(Ie+=Qg3 z`pSJI{Sdq#e&#x=1o#h|w%Sn7rlW)7JT8EJBJbM=fM0Rs{XiY}k!r0c;;&QouQ>8m zOSz8}p*11nrQ9@LT)+!V{9pA!c>lz0m^e@Gp90|NAJ5MEiS&=~$K(1cuhYEnOL~=l zeYza{?7u;)x15ejQc4Env$JZy3b;=?54~T%zUzQ|@*f@a$7Y>Bevq=?f%3lXwyStu zLFDtg72{*-&ZWzh; zEjWVn3ZCOB!M;2R_}^ap{uAzJh!_7QL2e#!m!D~~S>Ly?->LsEzt3_zUe%Rzto!-T>Qv$g~Y=6dpe%ih*^j<0RUpa6czDg-E@7u&*B^U=)z5`yr+dpD6<5LrM>-xLE??&l6*X&PSf7(U_)bIzuM?Eutc(*uGqgzHO`>4m9wV!52X>=Rt z)NggA-yN;dIc~^*!P+C`)L-U5jvp7~xKU2JWlKy9GKTDx+9&m4c)$q<(t-TV| zvp=th=>Bt@MrWR&UJop9yGUOjRGIj{z3TpETtDgayBm7M-=O?cSk}ES{jTd<4tWmX zp8VwD23AdqX*LPMHMS0nhDkUD=pckQR-+jj~_0XQk z%R{_dpno}Vhmv|7t)CYzPw;-sFTB4{1^l?clZP6Z+84YH^4%zHH!A-;`|(xD4c)cn zS0Jx&{zwA;aL*mT@%P`zCH55np9kFBgf*EsO?irHdYT}|KRf;?t z@a4d5n)l2%@xTS;nXdC%Zc_IASbFK8rjBrVL4TR{8#dtgt~qnMnXNY7yx&LyzFF06 zGx&WEas~Zsx}TK?eDtD=hF)L*nTLc&uKSqx8&WU(5HHp>CEyRB6uPl*jjYzr#ZQ)x z)jZ7WAFpS`?qgd*w~thQ;qO26+I`8fND*cn20gma^gQI`!wsHLR5h+W;4i@SoA*9? z^+}CCCLeTOf4lL(@p{n^AnhlDUW~G2;?5hoD>+&m2^4mSJp_eYd z40LOfvUBs&Kys`m-;R3TZ#aG9BO~H8I`1bW0(VKb*XQ!~qv+3dln3-Z5j!sCbv&U{ zf8PwHf13fjKG*dx1|R)nd0@t;y8el@54ffG3?EsSe-dUY`DrKIS-O1d&B|`dulQ?o zeO-Pfe z&pHa@8~4-ZKAyLsF8%DlecEr!uDbL~1pN`;>ZQ7VcEk_AhdTQAtKQM&bA053zghO| zox1$u#j0P(fA;7fVc(bM_$ved*`?#_>Gl<)z7l2ThHmY2{XD3*j#hryvS`dB^|kR` z2EW-szx$b~zw$z45Z|Lf6y9Z^^i?LitCN>l-gG zs6*&QCi#z)w%M=CFEz=ZbN2KGz2Eu$YkN1-^EKDEr2l{ZbfG;r%1Q6se5-D60qW_`#M|HBqw7-wI{j&Bcji9b z-g45hPU$%Hi^XyAHU6vuo#W{5;SbE_eJ6=C>cWyS5&ZC=5@XTh%rQ>+FZR91wm!1q z>_~wKo!_4h;Jae4Uw8JIPw$&_6X?-C@bS9E1K)4E6yk+HrVw=Y+n-NO$kzMK4?6oT zE8lUw?xzaSxlh;_81;Cp=7(y~3%aX*Kf3hYEt;P~*L^O&r(YA%%XjCleQVY}>V^Ih z&SYgbulp=0cNz|^SV#mC1oA9-2U1^&?9}IuZfTvi)CohpDRCW`Qt6} zzhQsq`^0R&sr~mo1)DDoZllG&epCC$zRJ98;4@oBfIp(b)c)$sZw}PIV$$7|Uk&;* zX#dAg`X_aGZ{`a^m$*(Cuk5ogRsIRIQ0v31Uw$>dzD-ayhu{k#kK@1z{w~|ImN$Uk z$szsgS)$~6h^v04r95vdN3j1<&-t=_y9<8dcRq#g2c7+U>!OLPwD0GJzJE*qz1gr) z@u+JSc7XhdYVfoFRvz!Uqsbl4eWWMcs_bX~jmc>-tiJo=`$3O%g1#31%XnjXT4k5W zT|yUsB!gax__rh||0V3LmsOWPDxi-Kd{2z|HADa2Z!zlKeU;zRU-~ve``&L%8R!LQ z=eu`an9J{-%6IybP2(j2{Z$FRoDY5(ZvNeB{ri44Z> z_VfFG0p@SuOMKbWWgnv-(x0K~=1=4Oq+Q|rm!CUt zZbzL&ekJ(1e_8bFAJduRgl?Un>?y`N`t$V#yYzfw2i*$&?idmMt)6$e{zwGw`HinO z*4H<@ui*iG?av*4(APK4-QoI=4YX~o>t75$>c4%)maV$}WuR049qZ<`()CY({7T>& z&S>92*Pr~f?@+H7+Ufk(iO2^iw+?+VLbop;auY!>4ZL&%`_HiBU+0zJ56dAKjD85M zU-BX6!(Vzfs9d^axImry^Guh{TkGq7DhD6^H137+GrFIuK&PKNd^RHNJH?d? z)%c2^r0o6XX|pat?#{1oA+XTxPKgfyR!e!{vWU6 z`at;EKKXBn>$XDYcYrSm<@8r>Grm)zI@rjIq4(PP`;lJYTKrM6kn3%PL$JS#(H{lC zz0o5nN?&(Z%@6Od3l=A?)cq9zAFp4o|GrN_oK3YL_E_A?PTG_F=XZ;(8lC>I0XO3D z$qnjhbhcjrzrOszZ$l)c$qf%~+tf?*hFD<=6{nt>gSF{w%`v zD~^X!;D&VRyTd%s2%gV1a(o1U|FY|*5!|mR@2K&{eOY{p^3#XSpDNY!Zt5Zh_@ur|9R@QAA$==&j6405y<~{iMGChBkgHC@xH7sY9zV4;JtAM-xf_*!6e^Ea3 z(>IB0M(gq&so~?r`&MtOE!HU( zsY(9IN#!|ue-(iqKp8pW`^oYhXE{WE1@?)SG-ZFIH@04Op+nJ){)#QZe3^*(-3DBj z@3*$R$fj`oEAl+RyMSv_bV2h3;Dk;;dO=S<^5X{=*U&@zqNXtN>)RTXk8u7He7D}< zkL13kIp|Y5w{Fz*if_h>4x(>4H8M$D_X$53y)P6??uEP~?*sxDu_f&!}5!c0DePs7PobRMxt%&b3=reNLmRx-t**(fncF6y> z%Lixmc__602kwz2OE>B3ve5b;^wj)w4t-t7^*7sJ_2aj7uHTEnUog9Vq250EsbAdu zjL&ub%fMHOa@ki+-_`ZYN4+&&*|{-qW47);u3IVp=bY;w)#Y;?lnDN-J8ryJ*Uy9c z1l*r#-1~Unu=YXcxOr*QxYoLV*gpMpHum-J>uSFYa@v&SJfyc@X==Z#_nokHyY&ub zH`~8@-M)r;`&`%Cfm?gxo@Kg!5>a1_cG5fkd6zyFYqw+r_|jje327z7F-EUCKXva?~bWex*tNHI`8ky8JTGt<#ksT-~~kV!kx; zPOWvO9k}HKle(Dmj^NGf%tYXye*cyCIqsD8%6_i%eZW1q;Jr3=tuxDDr*+xhC-wd< z10Vgj_qPtW>+2f&uM)UDOCL<;x1&ot0e?ZTC;O-xEaKFCJ1kzFVeYRqi?hih9z;%rexZV*%>f8r% z9asq5;K0y7^mQKhDU6@qbNYX+$4@2r=+DN#{Qa5k&oa=hS<0?oo4>w6Ung>1%=~k5 z&5K9${F4Yi`g?WmcU|>$G5zfU?yhO$AJhFs`OL2k9+`VumtSm>KiS*#DqVg)=w&F6 zUR3XP_NRo#r8oy=o;{L$amY~_!BD@Jc*oXU8izu6z|VIx}T{gDhlE83~f z%=k$6rxSD^$`$8&Ea9{-@(WQiOJHe~$=6sOYy~j9x-RwcWbOLw9+RGQKtN$vWC8M7A7w*0Erynk= zS+9iFxeKt)3v|4pL1v|Eqx6AcUud1X5cH?Nx#^RwzDsWhJ@os0#mHA*Jil=T`%(N; zf%f^_UWbX#dh5G{Tj^H~x__Bk*Cj4~yLSUukQ|(k5@sm-IiEBtU3Rn~=n_x7zUu^z zzZcYU!G3Ea;FPrBIy;0<#QlV1@C`cK_GDuRk*YN0$NHfk??2=Ne`3a(cbeF0;|qc3 zI^GZbwawSG=X#c0;ve3Bs08lT>f{tXz7l3C`+5Iib$YM*dVD!SXMEn(Sbf2Dt4D31mG3x4*`OADVr z%J(~h{sX-l<;jts**Sjo`z4g`LwqIVDnHDd_rkmcV?0ODiAE`Y2V zi#4qL8}uv2uNSzMvtH@N56KCg`WJ!z{D8v?xIZ%Jp*->c;_R5G^a~4asYa8oY}zt|LvEPfHUux^H9$`Yu+yxflfdC+kSaD z?2Ed!`M8+1x1Oba0q~#iez}zT%vOFe@0T5@=eRTPmy zu9$Bs$2wAot6Kpyz-4 zSfaik<9?Uz&)K)3OmCm}yDGr{;o|#m(c33K^&5U@;VPZK8hi;prT^x0ht}x&`9XJr zzVOHF2Xy~&ze@S*{^t$*ZXfp>KJdFrFAn=Xw?fo&TDewl86wMqW!%~v>e`P}a&%til?yLE!@e<$kwkaN$RZ+v0)}LDv&7FJo_A9{e1a9nY&5}8P%lvD;uaFGf!)G3^b)8P|=KZn{_`#o! z|Dvw_GS}zDz#Z7Lt+T%0VgFKp*STM>(DxhkUp4q&@9hcHsHy^mJ=f?HX^Dp;b?ElASTs=eY{|fNYpR3M1xkvY>AM|RJi>8dY zSKps;Kg#^l>h)3o==sGtFWeu^J{-SL-;dJY$-qSvCEl$2i}INtZ#wq(7+rp$Nq&R) zOf690=`?~@-_sjLtn5XpkqraGb zHhO;~&R71RKWD$_|3&ww9dr-Mqz!q$!JJ_H=cAtSyE0+($6@;s=v53{>yPR`ukS~S z5!Yp)Ctf*Xptc{0sYE^Jlj)~6&e7M~$;fBc1^|l@L+|S1TZ}$?emks}f z)}hC-4*RtEbNBx^cw+G3RH5^}%?Ym44jj$&zSMBB^nv)7zc=qk-Wlg;J6@k}iqSsz zvwcz*ZLa51Jt+KTpmRUF|EKZO>udB%&^g}}ckR}{0q7DhTwhu9l>OWkWZZ zt<}AswS#Z)C9ZcHIfzuHAwM=B?Q=hy4E$Z=nl$G=i(G>D0MB)HKJd-%E*{7GH^htm z+|T-fo7~3!KKEThuS7lfvwwZ|T5CPNtP8`(bFX8oFV^BKw4XhR{`>IbPad3p@3}Ri zgUBy7`S)zqlE3x&*aP|8&vtxzb3e|P!k-U1*VWs9-f=1SyL$f=1IPYpb^Y*bxbM~d z!QUq?13vv$XBX~!rM+s@b3Z#}@ySE%2l0O*=-kgHEK>d%IQxZFb@|^8yc4){hd*7c zk3SFUxu0!!;N#=^_~U+-@!$07Wpl#fAN*1OhwFh1TWyvFo7zF-_AWBj^+dv$T=Z@KRkJ*mGJ z^f~7iUDdKCuZQx;ImFqN_$~Dg-ucB%qL#rQ$|DhY0Di|^UsuJR88lw#qHj6mp6`CP z1bB|KDxCj+`&rw)$`9uKY!d33XU+RrFX;5czwKwEVBZ^WEx*31XycQ#uLS((yPqup zz8s}_KWn*9*}-vV-p|@VKi~aq0sQ9zpL@~k2jqH%Ij)#*^RYj41Ap*r=3}kJSnZIw zaU%W-fqV3u`<&eO3Z47e#8JwgR#$!T2j_XASAx%q{p`UD4{g`y_hiVgggyx$-Tk7z z{^Nete!r4`@Ys^S_5D&AzPpeJdb`yBHPgp0_nVY|@#HQ$_4Q6Q+Rq2S|4jSKb@?9D z7o+qH{A;ytpZhQM{3z)$H|4Bi`-bmNHHAM}V#rz2vvP6=r=_M(Ntv9Hc2jn)=5`rx zq31EJis0~y+fNi1=<)+5`LFEyV2&=o6m(0zvTw=Z@{_t>E8%Y& z==q!Weyhigr8?a2_Et>?==!{8&mjDPfyz7GhXp5wc6ePph_4{%Zb5@r9dgL`z=*R5r=AN2SZmV=BPX`gw_ z1^Vpe|4Y}_6`_1S5c%xy#ft_HE$%m1V#MGN-XnC$=S7fvzWF>4 zc;@p`od19Myb3sTKDRAZexd)(`P>CM{qS%3dOB6 z23%YJ@7MCZ0HHIV=R@9}>t-I+$CV#^m7s4;tT?ER+sNdb)qM)S|8Z(+uSwH~|Kt`m z4EYh&;OF}vcLaKO=zp;KFzE@)l)ZfaDkB<2rkOAhf@1?=$y z-}I4$(Rv;!#`|}S*~rQm5BEe;6^S2`wOyOwdz>wYEp-NbU>UyFNVVl?C^X(})HP2cmV0={4W zS5L;+h*YJ>H~Yu-u=3AWZ)82q>yzXXyxBiV!2kL8z~KA;x__kK&HfQt@*UR#=#>Y4 z{_aEx&UHERUCJ`l3%^18Ync3F94syP{%mr8H9 z)zU0=9`K`lLzUKTs;qurl@9!_U-5q64yw{p4SJ+nM_05|rS~#b+Iy(djqlUj2dVS2 zF{;eR?_xRUsPpPPRTeE&rT;!vR^_WQd5J2$_)e#Fg*q>KT$PphJ*a~9>fF9nm5$d` z>3?07#qX)I=mS-{KUAe{FX$*MK2hiPFH~8zAM^vNw0xt=3Y5;@)Oo@0sG-g1pXA)AS}72NtxxlB`tM` zPu~!Weg(tPFOMnx(|>#6(4%+s>5c~-YqM8PxP*JeETmgFmmQ+zIsPwe6E;+pFV8`W+{`i=f#X@@*FN*~GsQ#)0#vskMazfn(? z+%r!}OU<|?C2Lw*$ZIO@*ss-)6Pt7Jr%qYEX0)@X{9_!3?9d^020PxUnG>qDSnNjc zCl)F{67R;jjuZY~;A7m$sb0@(Tv9J`iy()1KhAZW@cU3-j*@cuUH@uR{U8At2lbWz zMa~fU$2hW85&SE9*q;cu&xLaxr}I-^5un#|EhY6LHxF`%FT}Zy6aHk>m!PCvAL6UR zRKHdL#$mSac~xx*ZtU>C=wW>_+&&x5b)4uyxztxg==EJ7Qwovmh8*I3IM;E)??in8 zO5vA!=0Crwz7GsD+cyXm!HtjzF%HqA68s_jDrK*ZllHCwfY%L$U$4JjDsYHg7vvD1 zjB_0){0XS{q7)HQZ)vLXL!qgjdWG}_em&Y=f>H|6qYV7S2XL=Ie+a)`-%%=X zh+NxK%1^{QajxTpzZ&f&fi5DXp7Wc}RNnxKQeWb)Mui@CqDL|Ki7&;uj+6Ep0l@yC zT-NLTB62NHEBlB~z`2eSxfN*70XpS!-;!*qKOg|(puY0I$oWqGF^-<92>um4^1)Ah z5zcj-@E-yn=P5bW>-BySxdF%_z8dE`PWb((k6*3)LAeDnDn6a2`f*T{`VyapiZN1w zL-g=~pZGkS>p0P4JOJzu5uw-jp-`g~xuuXpdaERO@$RXa3a~&uAKGc_^6cJL-?PMgr>P!61sMq6P^spBx{}AuOxsH?eD3|(DF6(L;Qd>P!6XsMqs`=wW>(+&&x5b)4uye&$27T;BVYdXejf9O8XA*Ks1(iTVPR zlv`0>#i!p?KTH6|VYZL;4=Qr-ujo+;{t*6IWv`ACJ;+aeMSx!4+$7fpIm9R9T*nE2 z0_wdeDVO{ILQ_5CDx@#;VEtl~9%bMsK7ex_Cwh>d`ceCH^(c*1ab$T;*~9v;|3weh zb3Y+4(Zd0L>XC?Z9VdFYQO}a?IT|ZH@=bcQ{}(-2-vo3iL=V47k8+&rIMJgL^(=*7 z>Ju=o;-3%qM*{&E2jfWo7d-9L=PS{}1%Bd_ajxTZezSg*tH+bbErcB6OK`5^M6MV0 zWhkky9s7bRQ~eMqN_~kRfr=SYfkX7Ly`cO)jyjFNIKxNcHzs!u^X)R%bHKLWZGqK9Q&xP1vY*Kwi;`I!gIa@(2YCPNPK zUYzSVk?TNxK1#|hz;&MzQ+*q>(?V-c154qTdj1}k z6Li+c$v?(n_A~8eJ{64U;Q>GKc{tZ`(jNI4_rkB&>+`0_ErlH7D{!vkguf8=RVXRf zf$KmC>%;TF)dDaM>MQ??oPqL>aa^N{;9t=r5&XovajxTpzYq8r_j0P&>+vsgiy()1 zKhAZW@cU3-j*@b%Sl?Eg>Ni3U>P!4fs2_(?3em&9A$**;aIWJ-56Wdf3cp@|iB#Ya zxp|O7d?C(tobV^3z67O+ka}KUtuWQEK^tcKo&9^VY&h3((jNJ#ukh>j z9EX(ah8*I3IM;E)??in8O3E!leELoG(_om{z8q9^69G8HzDn?i@GmNRb)4vt4glj# zMCkQHDAXuLt_yOAPsX{96aEC$dr?wuGOiaFn(Da^Wl21L&$!HlUkJTI_8I5W?tQ4g z5v3HOcQyElkAF$|L&pjKJ>X;i$*Eqi=TVWH1UbZeaIWKo-;Vk`l$6WgH7qvObKa-E z#8WOysTVyez)yS?&UKvVVSQQIZO;4rojV8UZ0{oZ$2cfg{uepSw~M6$hv?x3Kk+`C z>o}dCeiIRTy*_V>TtDOxUygGfC;SDduS7|?eq48p-=yqkeHZ!1IH<4uFLHXwKgO|2 z6~VuvhYS3~C*xel2|vdf^%Vhny{@;&ErcB6OK`5^gx`z$GL)3-!up}gRL^;m`V!Ca z`+!v75It-q%0I+AajxS;5AsuA5uw*}{UP-t*9SSo7vNmS34apmi&0Xpt)ALPl$+|m z7l3h4U-@6;{2~7s$3#^G|B4=#SHkT}z`2eS{vW|dedScI*ZW1}CPNPKUYzSV;dh`u zA0_3MMJW49O!Y^hhuOXps9%dx3eh6~e&VZfuH!_HwH!Djrb&- z>p0<$N4*E7@JoFq_9q3V`tJl_95Jd0{uMmyb@`%4Dfo%6z`2eS{wmb76v0xTkNs%E z=I}gl67AD(#Q%f(B`Bp3JrcoByc_2_PTD&KK8_bT)$50WE``V~f*j)gIM;E)??Zh# zO5vCKO4wIzs^264o{qTa_b2r4!!h?&IUT= zda!OzG}SK_fN@Y?`CsHbE&mvYE?@NUfuHz-f6-%!Vh^n^Md`Dj|Vrdm)K49Y0!iEQjck(IXlB#CvhB<3tb2t*7zp^?KZi+!Dwk zz6|F&PWbatA3!PMrQY65!>GedT|_FOYwXgZ9h+qDR8p%0I+A zaIWKof4VRj2jflt*Xz4T1rCwxg&gAZajxTpKN0msC`E+SdvM>POsh9^{EPD~%lIdh z{#7W;pH$~1t5jL=lq$VXt1=1q#T~d$9FO~{RVd4G|F8u2xe9QfDFOFaics2dzrl*@ z@|7sdaNRix*IymD9vP48c2y|Lah<9J*JlDKOL6@o5&L*M_O({*|0+?IVSiJM^}Yk^ z-gvAJt5B9>Jye2uy8!cM0`hth$~@#jH}ZuGSy`p!Nyyo4Xy`=Gwm3t)~q~H0@3d9pK0hAJlv&9|7l;0NV;^_jwhrt z`1~g7J$TOa)@Jh;HT&Yl`Ru zH_A`f-*@BLu3Lle@fbS%#pi}u@_8HHcj5I;UXSzPx_|?vv@P*g0Qn^-rC$6;{aA*c z3(Za)l{+&%Yg&!E7SWf_g~q?D{B*G7jQ8uI4+f`qk$1BQHV&3a>eMpYlV(fJ&dN#8 z$xX{joomaUoRK~)CD(Xd*JgyaCw+2yZjNnocCIIgN}DmuK&9o_QgUtCS;Cp=O_`aV zW1uIe7&5xsAU0S8^I>x}Z@HnD5JaEr0Ax83=R-2RxpQqPSyOB|hLIU*xrXRmPg?fO zbfZ;6quJ?Gf(ob3Ov_EP<)me%WaXx(igLMWzT9vHq zXBn-C+>{L4%(R^BSu<194A0zQ4D|Hbh90RYS+*Qc%FHxdifw9|VYu;5vMnVeBRe(d zIeJ0b=W~MIovL4?8L@vh+G9Bj=ZWc447+Vo1LDW zVGPz&ETccC%}SYRI4>=Y z>IUPH&&5@l^yT#embXIRQCTV898b0pBwoW)X)|Z1*_7|5rpue!wv;K^UL!kpo0>f{ z(@<)5x;zP8@jL@1HB}! z(|m@>sp+{HMnL6EPcwX()gycARGSgRIl%}|&#}$QGM=Eo|S8O z)01L^zd;HH;M_1j@%c07`{DX9j#v)S^zo*o&ordX$)1@p#qdRH_RJ|cMk`a&ylKWC z!*ta#vr{q*1#O1MY`I1>QrjArh(GvzQJJZIUiV<>MEe6_gw3!y#fYek3<+jqa2fHH zlb$&%BR3^0Eqhju;VVy?pe_yci9ojm<-bV4vZ zjX|245quROIE1pYb8V9)d~;LMvkbpTR~RN69hYMyWr_MavQnrM4B5f)g?Y2oqz~<8 zc{TJKs4TM?{x&9VHGqO0B0XV5WV$i#B;^GYiqR#W?2IXNgS5x{&Plt&?Y{x?S@Jr= zz$`6}?#MPqsBvzLQe(8_GR?|hFq+Kvdb4wkcncd6IZU~l;i3oc50{$sa6u2218_dt zV|2Xa=+sa^$)L!QL1?&K`Q6AQGKdZRjPyGvJy(2T=#_=GrCr|FOe_nxpZ2mGj&|v9 zJ!NKQPf5$L8S*_wD5|j)Jj*r)-Bcqov*)N}CRt+UTw4&XnIG(T-hV7L=`jxNvSeNu zC~-D3Ma8^fXNHj_Rqq=eTr<~nwarX{JB%E!LQ|9p&Va_G7mCi@^vqD=6uQARN4NX|~rNH-?nnMT+d$x1Y`8BUX_ z$LO!Dv>c8F5hLyJew=4dxZR8cmNoH^l_u*8W1hHU)|6?PlJ<Z zP7Cl=jkQV--Zv{Z>CqeZvb+-K165cVsU~Q*(L91JEpxIl8jP$c>dY~Qe;PuxrbV%v z_py>cJU_cfait=TH8Q*`qk{cvbhLD3&A>zE>1xc>My@dOLWU6rHe;?xlVx9x7Rqkk zZz?nCkqkRoay*PStg2ZsWXY_Ynr(O;i@ciISS>UpAhj9Fm>oE~8z~|*okJ<{3-1pl zeH8AOVbF(VVyGWxrUh47ngeQ@mcY+QPZ3`kfs&G*q2h6RR`#5Xv?`I@EUo{D8 ze&YQP&)#r9jf6fdZwmPdks4f88L^pdWJXD%sBLlKpmz(Xfg{$=!3Zy9E~tYVl|E5H=2KC8&mUa5({m zjU{@TF{_7W6lI*~!Rze>COvw>ewKVSx@J5D<06{lvK=3}2=!}_=cr3354Vw6s- zpZ>41Yk_vFDA&p9DNQMqv=lrDVgQ8{P!DJ&=mkT|BZVSSS`CP+r?j<^4 zGXo4h(y9lkpD4;1c6eDwPDB471`#$3jrEJo>Rs;UbB5Qr+burXFEDAnE3(7pv+$u~ z$7UVB>lPs;KYkBPIr9AeR`cAy(mdZ^*F3*7);!-c*F4|*);!lEn&&)S^AYTuP4-G} z|C91^-%ZPNA5Qb!kJCK&=QPjv6*SN9j5W{aewycVIL&h(u!F~QAGf?l=5?MuLd>Ea z6o4gQ1y~0L9<}Wy1dIUVz$7pO%mItQGO!A40E3TNy+O;Z1pZ?r+X9 zGl=CYm#%TD+vo0=MIX2Mp8h~=%BqoTHi(?)+YbqdQxIOhdZk&cp0;k?nzdkjp1u_H zWPx`d_KDngAARUV5t8=BecXx7RF>yHuFISJJH9j5ey$>)29Wub5Dq?J%O$*&hxJT6 z5O$a?HE&yMc=eg9=dS+Tu(Pe`m5cj|L(mu8ddV?YtytjQj>6`Yyc3hI4<3dBF*ZEVAt3=Xs{D?f+@=Le;d!=XpO{?@e|6ca9KaZ;P zy8ONT$9~^%(wn?G_MxlrPY7~Dz&x-D3{_fw5dY+mF5>V;|8Dw&$a4=CtXsa4K9>H( z{reo!A3x)UQ}c%(c%#UO9`3snxvxFP?nIrIUOv2vJxcVIpr;Dla?)Ezec<6^c#C>xN^}`pUKiAt_?PDyl#xzkgy;UW=6V0sJin{gJolM3Kf>pZ zDqr5mwR{@=RP+2ET=U#7);#9}n&)#8&2v9h^ZX9h<)uCG`4w>zoNmUmlv!nXA!!F} zAA`TO?Pb=c6Ar(8!ZBM#KY~XK9|_b7`L6L1~`jrRF(b(>(V%HP7!yG|%~+ z<|}xPs(J2bYM%2!&2v7e`5}DItaAfHj~GukPW`H?h z5m*LRfem2r4=6t{3QPb~z!6{`I0_sC)_}e$$`2d_#(+b>G%yP+0879Munr77WA*Yr zUqCwwIlO6iJ>O$7FJY`V&qdlcR@&ylf3*7VSUmH_%sIciSMo9OeP!^RZ!A1**I548 zZQe3d($^5rdF%9@@gJ|c;Ecy4z1YKfGm-1lwY0~XvWmXIpHLsbo6fyr!|V;`Uj}_0 z=g|3P;@mi36e#j?z9YjNS6L3C$ng^S5Yls8q8yR3f+ElSId7pH(Umt`hy4YVvjPk} z+p1^pJw=}DfcOaF^?1W|7_t5_`yNX?YSDKZ5Oy=3<1+0fx^{czM0(D*C`Z)t%$M^& z$`M_8!*%$jgmTt_q37ED!udiL@o~g!znC{#yo;EGe8$ly^WX&hTX1-{e{kO=w(F0F zZT;Mn-nN9XyJvqpcX&zs68EJiV};jWpg-_uTb^?sKJ@TsZ@u9;G1A2MMZg=~-u2;u z&koO@x6Io{m-Gq5v%f7|w*Jo46Ejwe@Sf~3o84XQNkd-_c>C9<-u%dv-QME_qpxGV zLAxYB@mm?`YCzh-^*530@N>;;1R^7sl!yB@p_=u_{U@&Y{>*<{_JqWnymoWFOXRv& zeqTYJvzg(;KB18WxI}LZ`jWtN-r9D-3!7`+Hj=TsKY6$959}|JRCu;4+AX}Xqho)o z1iclYk?}5~1mwI}&JQFkde{z$%!lhik&BqG((2F~x!2nH2n5236dpiS+N>Pl~1Xa@$)L>7V)C+D-MVhP~U8=;6L8abKjB^DWO^lydG?KA-3t zg`Ntq_|m5Lz3W?-t&n6UzIk3M?SeWFOnx2xEBs>1FN4OvTz?u_rs;}8ihq(w?~a4g zF5LPz;eCrvK60O7{2`uppD%~_k|QVfa6cyop7LV|(@s$%^4y2n8+q4X)C+Sw=;p7) zOD%s%xm-VYlXuH){Iw75E41tJx&2Y}R-Jh97vpJX8S!-`N59gp9OGYZ*)4wJIl5`Y zQ*Rh@+OOPC*jvBS4vwGNuk0^G`n9O+0ROk9f7;tm7d;%eiF}@T?(pj2 z`5RM9xpy!A5Pccw$pgQ(<*xU<@Z5esM10>Ec%$394oF`4bT~8n5yboJi08cQ$om$Z zw0-l0qZuE3)!NB0kY z@n|mZ+-G7^t~m6jfRo=j<;lA?TzIP_mwMp*faN03d63JSzdQPK8G5TgrY|7eaCotY z&mCFLXXouYd1B!BQAua?_k51I3iamRfJI;AHS5;|@aV&*es4?dGv0Jj^s(NF+<#xW z_>47+*75{($=$XCmbU61D9AC|9^JfEcqF3zLNB%Gu zk>lpd#iy;_Xrp{m9_k(Zt1Z|6{p>1V>Pw|Bi-_c(08hEX9V>r|iuYVJ$Mqxk9R}~Q_WO3(avrpMM{}+!dCBG3 zjeQ6DI|TXLqWL$v`H}k$EN2|@_g-{fWN-YKf&33AZ$D#i{8)ti$!i}vPVNEph1f5C zzXo5o{t5%BZv_1+>hMNi&wVB{UaVPU7UK)nwuXFD zf6eE=S?Ia{jLWZCUw$vgf>{0BKOnGPYZf4F?!_`VRMOnBR<>iQqcGAZ-08j zf8TlH|4RITu`mx_!o0+8j*~==m&}K5oEB`p%<|c=l6&_3jsGGGAV)Uu^IGuKjuFc_H`ohkyF1 z-@adr5dGyI`l*k|as88X%v}YO3s=8yxAnue+Z!*PG9|i&`orLxg*JbPf7pkK^ppE; zoU4BbdVXH`#Wg$UZhVvaN4o3pcn_n5`U|7HBfuIk20aBwpY;1U(v=)u?5E#}^pp9d zqxlmNVt)kvIrN70&$WN}(G`<^cIVMzzv!V~iS$Q&fqA)Agv=#+jI4Jhq30dn`To_# z%`bjONE6?m1s^@e_KR76e2!CmiJzE0&+$W7WxcmAwM@qcB50pf_whvi& zV0_cD&oF{?A|U&_To2KYb(F6NIr1WJ>~7k{`Y2Uj4sYB3#tw-$vdw!O?WQjmrbWVD zZRP)mE&nh4hrKyv@>ASD>5GACNx7OyK;0@dc!lcv)}x5KaQwE^3aPv1=mbB%Sn|z+1MwgFxYpoGdkczU@W-CMo2z0fQDEqSHgFJyf^ed?+eY$Gxs%6-Ge zbN&?lr}fvmqb{Dtw$Lj7gh|1(Z2zVIhakUU_R05f?4-QgZ*)4!2#Or*P21zj8Q*lQ zi%Q791{8UzC+<_wpIO8Q|7FWZUgX_=#_@CBzt2D6#clVWBJrlZ_}Tv%ro9ptyV&lD zz1sf>^3MS!y|jPM>u6WOiI?`DM40WL^;C1@r2SJ)^m^^zH+R*iju4+%6y9t9PFVaO zfu00-+9C414A(KAOrjl@fCKPz($Oz=#4yff9p32cdH<4iDA%Aee)0ZQMfx9{^}vi- z=PcVMwwd_meTQ}*yd(A??UsJP`%c(z{V?s?fh}%7(Bpaxaw}2?f4#FGbdKXm$afpZ z#cymEMA|tX+VXXdk7eX1@!iHp+8^j^)w|R~7-2mg#vM6n4>{;hf~TGIsbIJ9a8G^^ zy?N*xPp=*i$J5)`3%$|~I39*kzL^g%o9?y)J^sWeSpP-ux#;_y?VvRt(%&h_uit&w zje9d5GM(#JX)m;iI0n7rjdOX(HGpotiC(rpBI7lVU_2OaoQn6i+E=%6ivG(wa?%cq z2byR2_aku(oXF!`kI(Vdl&hMrxUz8ksk;cvezc8WgUSBRWvuUoXte6DCqBYIfAGW6Vh@;^3z^Q#}cPb5ry ze;qvKF28dMw_d$`sF%okUNCp{x`@q2^fdDs+{gMO`_E`>(&7hqGM@x^=5yopwI4_F z?(<>DQ%2CF?U)be9Jy}u;UMBmDu2<}ZM@l&ytE(Qw>iF3Ui9(mW@mI#tDQ)`d~QU4 zP)`za+y^7-O6Rs_FSi%(?w{e&#ku_@~yvk{MoNa1bE;_9LDb&} za1=NQJBNT-px7(pRRR6K> z5B=uPi0?~)XE~=X+xmr6^8D>gpGG|QCGtk>#@Euat(fLtCB-^fiE&KKXDh`Q|S!k^IDOeE!1r zK%V=itasr}{vGWtHpTjB2*~tdgwqZ$_VYKmi9GKP_V3|oQhRwup?BlX>sS2wYt!a4 z-v)U1xzC>bws_s}nt6*hnorQX`)zPPTfXmI`bPY+$<=^qt?r9I?9=kwv zNjbP5MSqj$K8NOcU(-CtU6(g@cdQqOU`HC51r~tJKZZLz~ zePq{PM#t;?o}K8MX7lgmm$&PWw<|C9d;Y_BG%RQKTQ}b$adLV7Q}M!!{{~<`{Z~Yo z{u@J>dL^CsuLhps&~)nu35)+Y&awRnFaBeg$adB1y+r04g?@&|L&;D4!tV_!|LX@o zQvPaU1Uwj9){2<|o6E?9u+fT3Zzuj`bU3sxv{KW6M z=%?26kBPxPm( zgv5vN-2&qeeWLzO>XP^Z(lP!A*M4a#=U5V7MtlYDgUky2@Z|}EE&VmbhYr!;I8&zJ5wu{U6d^|Cyisw%AtxNFRn=;M5hzwbeg(+6+JRaoxx;@23*>>a|Nc z;WOa#K+3beM;%`L&HJCox%JEYU9*0XZVXrhj#s}8m0#?g)?bpJDRalVCk=lk963`i zUmfF8(&0_|-9b@gE+Xw+yK&XU!z<5}a|7iZVNb@ihvs-xfS!Gi_~0GePfyMk0eNqh z>j<8Yz{PyP8J+a4GnKEjrlVahYi z?|2#3NO|fn&9wUIAIgs)AIj68F?_efZ~}6pN}lbR-&Zof2K-Y~^4xz;9Bu7k`W)m3 zj%;uLw6l(Lv>Db&`U@Cpa1o-9}p?d&3wMUdB=ZCz73qe5{JCV3D0wk zTwc=O`eV7?Xr@nNKP#)!Cvjei=DDs>ynhVo=^xnP9|d1)*YD3W{N7eQ8oT{z@B@k; z0zc^REq~OT<>C1(LtW*3QP}0<`Bo#2oaCQFSeGLOzUaue@^3Wr=ea;tM^5U4=U{1` z_A1^VI@}5+xh12U+H#K zg`C@drG6H8*RE!Nq2GfuTlFY@r++n1|0>=eM|w9uqsJcspKRCf4Zf_% z&^+zb<6^OgojLI3_I&*rgsTqk`j_k82IA>gqLf$UIZxocJPG;Wan^5Ip7S)W+Z$+y zMffv{bgUQlZ|w*6SIx7(D&9W^y}JF4g0Hpb>(4WMe5>8N{^2^D_OqNs?H{g72cT~d zsO7m1;<~*I|D<5gkg|vKDDInZypCc#$U5@UZ+V~7?Ys^-?H{)P!24Q$kbco@|LuJ9 zJaz5=IOLRmAIBFZ-yB~w&+$d^{$h9i{v7ynyPf_F!c~WN>zDfi4aBpah`N5cuR;G) zF8KbI-&*7A#3jtJKhP?Vw1YDE zu;Pp0ql(XgPbfYEKGn`Qf5%JLcOG)Coo@YcpJNnqtPi5DKkjpkDETqR9?{Qr2=`r* zXdhA7?;C9MPxJT0wf#eobM2RU=ej`2H}7ML_ZPbB@n^x8+U;qM`xV7E=g&RnkK9KI zoM6jGKN7V+xo=TNJ|UHk?Vsm3>iby+^2$HW`F{@a%$Ig>Kc=YiV?5<~AL4#b8g|B! zuI%WSdf|On`M)`yD&8MG(fUc-9|oTQ(hpqkXgwoc^tkPu`!RXQv7AJfmtpQVjCbGS zyq^0p)IW-RYVG#>*?x3+xh{!)u+=YI`?)_co;{praDQS5`qDs_kLBfiMBFb)!QKJL z7nD7`k8=Nv?V*8oP*L(nNk-=4`K=L*1A}Nsfe*Ep_oG(4`8#GYtgA}6??xPXY7D-Yniq_WTYV`!qq;Jy~~Q!EbbXEC?G#l}>N$pb8o&agOy o=VMvy=hU#DGwS$3-q)z$yYbvXc6}N6wk=2fI*VhDyj0Eq1CRq*CjbBd literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..549155e --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean @@ -0,0 +1,427 @@ +import Std + +namespace CoreReader.Agency + +inductive Phase | formation | application | revision + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +structure PrincipleKey where + owner : Nat + localId : Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Subject + | system (owner : Nat) + | principle (owner id : Nat) + | process (owner id : Nat) (phase : Phase) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def Subject.owner : Subject → Nat + | .system n => n + | .principle n _ => n + | .process n _ _ => n + +inductive Activity | generation | assessment + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive QuestionKind | conformity | formationBasis | applicability | revisionGrounds + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive SampleProgram | alwaysTrue | onlyAtZero + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def SampleProgram.run : SampleProgram → Nat → Bool + | .alwaysTrue, _ => true + | .onlyAtZero, n => n == 0 + +/- A generated candidate specifies both the inputs it tests and the scope it proposes to license. -/ +structure MethodDraft where + testedInputs : List Nat + claimedScope : List Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def MethodDraft.accepts (draft : MethodDraft) (program : SampleProgram) : Bool := + draft.testedInputs.all program.run + +/- This finite application asks whether a proposed rule's observed inputs support its claimed input scope. -/ +structure Inquiry where + target : Subject + kind : QuestionKind + requestedScope : List Nat + currentMethod : MethodDraft + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive ReasonContent + | purpose (inputs : List Nat) + | declaredScope (inputs : List Nat) + | observation (input : Nat) (output : Bool) + | counterexample (program : SampleProgram) (input : Nat) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def ReasonContent.identifier : ReasonContent → Nat + | .purpose _ => 0 + | .declaredScope _ => 1 + | .observation _ _ => 2 + | .counterexample _ _ => 3 + +/- Reasons have independently supplied contents, a stable local reference and the actual target they concern. -/ +structure ReasonObject where + reference : Nat + target : Subject + content : ReasonContent + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive AssessmentResult | supportedWithinScope | insufficient | notApplicable | undetermined + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive WorkOutcome + | assessment (result : AssessmentResult) + | generated (draft : MethodDraft) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A method's question, source reasons and limits are determined before looking at its activity records. +The meaning relation describes application of that method, not its universal adequacy. -/ +structure Principle where + key : PrincipleKey + activity : Activity + declaredMethod : MethodDraft + applicable : Subject → Prop + inquiry : Subject → Inquiry + reasons : Subject → List ReasonObject + limits : Subject → List Nat + meaning : Inquiry → List ReasonObject → List Nat → WorkOutcome → Prop + +structure WorkRecord where + usedPrinciple : PrincipleKey + target : Subject + activity : Activity + inquiry : Inquiry + reasons : List ReasonObject + limits : List Nat + outcome : WorkOutcome + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def RegistryCoherent (rules : List Principle) : Prop := + ∀ p ∈ rules, ∀ q ∈ rules, p.key = q.key → p = q + +def TargetResolved (rules : List Principle) : Subject → Prop + | .system owner => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key.owner = owner + | .principle owner id | .process owner id _ => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,id⟩ + +/- The inquiry names the registered target's declared method contract, not an unrelated candidate. +For a system inquiry this finite model uses the registered generation contract as its assessed artifact. -/ +def TargetContentResolved (rules : List Principle) (question : Inquiry) : Prop := + match question.target with + | .system owner => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,0⟩ ∧ question.currentMethod = p.declaredMethod + | .principle owner id | .process owner id _ => + ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,id⟩ ∧ question.currentMethod = p.declaredMethod + +def Performed (records : List WorkRecord) (s : Subject) (a : Activity) : Prop := + ∃ record ∈ records, record.target = s ∧ record.activity = a + +/- The old scope condition remains available without conflating scope with content completion. -/ +def ReflexiveScope (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : Prop := + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → rule.applicable s → Performed records s rule.activity + +/- A record uses a registered principle on the same resolvable target, question, reasons and limits, +and its result must actually follow that principle's method. A negative result can satisfy this relation. -/ +structure ValidApplication (rules : List Principle) (rule : Principle) (s : Subject) + (record : WorkRecord) : Prop where + registered : rule ∈ rules + applicable : rule.applicable s + usedIdentity : record.usedPrinciple = rule.key + targetIdentity : record.target = s + targetResolved : TargetResolved rules s + activityIdentity : record.activity = rule.activity + inquiryIdentity : record.inquiry = rule.inquiry s + inquiryTarget : record.inquiry.target = s + targetContent : TargetContentResolved rules record.inquiry + reasonsIdentity : record.reasons = rule.reasons s + reasonsNonempty : record.reasons ≠ [] + reasonTargets : ∀ reason ∈ record.reasons, reason.target = s + limitsIdentity : record.limits = rule.limits s + followsMeaning : rule.meaning record.inquiry record.reasons record.limits record.outcome + +/- The registered normative interface requires contentful application, not just activity labels. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive +organon.charter.reflexivity#p1 sha256 13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757 +organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1 sha256 8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +def Reflexive (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : Prop := + RegistryCoherent rules ∧ + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → rule.applicable s → + ∃ record ∈ records, ValidApplication rules rule s record + +theorem Reflexive.toScope {owner : Nat} {rules : List Principle} {records : List WorkRecord} + (h : Reflexive owner rules records) : ReflexiveScope owner rules records := by + intro rule hr s hs ha + obtain ⟨record, hm, hv⟩ := h.2 rule hr s hs ha + exact ⟨record, hm, hv.targetIdentity, hv.activityIdentity⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem noSelfExemption (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) + (h : Reflexive owner rules records) (rule : Principle) (hr : rule ∈ rules) + (s : Subject) (hs : s.owner = owner) (ha : rule.applicable s) : + Performed records s rule.activity := h.toScope rule hr s hs ha + +def localMethod : MethodDraft := ⟨[0],[0]⟩ + +def inquiryFor (s : Subject) : Inquiry := + match s with + | .process _ _ .formation => ⟨s, .formationBasis, [0], localMethod⟩ + | .process _ _ .application => ⟨s, .applicability, [0], localMethod⟩ + | .process _ _ .revision => ⟨s, .revisionGrounds, [0,1], localMethod⟩ + | _ => ⟨s, .conformity, [0], localMethod⟩ + +/- These original inquiry inputs do not depend on which work records happen to be present. -/ +def sourceReasonContents : QuestionKind → List ReasonContent + | .formationBasis => [.purpose [0], .declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true] + | .applicability | .conformity => [.declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true] + | .revisionGrounds => [.purpose [0,1], .declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true, + .counterexample .onlyAtZero 1] + +def reasonsFor (s : Subject) : List ReasonObject := + (sourceReasonContents (inquiryFor s).kind).map fun content => ⟨content.identifier,s,content⟩ + +/- The application-specific evaluator examines actual scope and sample/counterexample contents. +It is a finite inferential method, not a universal standard for empirical or value claims. -/ +def assessInquiry (question : Inquiry) (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) : AssessmentResult := + let contents := reasons.map ReasonObject.content + if limits ≠ question.currentMethod.claimedScope then .undetermined else + match question.kind with + | .formationBasis => + if ReasonContent.purpose question.requestedScope ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ question.requestedScope = limits + then .supportedWithinScope else .undetermined + | .applicability | .conformity => + if question.requestedScope.all (fun n => limits.contains n) then + if ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.observation 0 true ∈ contents ∧ question.requestedScope = [0] + then .supportedWithinScope else .undetermined + else .notApplicable + | .revisionGrounds => + if ReasonContent.purpose question.requestedScope ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.observation 0 true ∈ contents ∧ + contents.any (fun reason => match reason with + | .counterexample program input => question.requestedScope.contains input && + question.currentMethod.accepts program && + !(program.run input) + | _ => false) + then .insufficient else .undetermined + +def finiteMethodResult (activity : Activity) (question : Inquiry) + (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) : WorkOutcome := + match activity with + | .generation => .generated ⟨question.currentMethod.testedInputs,question.requestedScope⟩ + | .assessment => .assessment (assessInquiry question reasons limits) + +def finiteMethodMeaning (activity : Activity) (question : Inquiry) + (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) (outcome : WorkOutcome) : Prop := + outcome = finiteMethodResult activity question reasons limits + +def ownSubjects (owner : Nat) : List Subject := + [.system owner, .principle owner 0, .principle owner 1, + .process owner 0 .formation, .process owner 0 .application, .process owner 0 .revision, + .process owner 1 .formation, .process owner 1 .application, .process owner 1 .revision] + +/- Applying an existing rule is not a generation event in this application. -/ +def generationEligible : Subject → Bool + | .process _ _ .application => false + | _ => true + +def generatingRule (owner : Nat) : Principle where + key := ⟨owner,0⟩ + activity := .generation + declaredMethod := localMethod + applicable s := s ∈ ownSubjects owner ∧ generationEligible s = true + inquiry := inquiryFor + reasons := reasonsFor + limits _ := [0] + meaning := finiteMethodMeaning .generation + +def assessingRule (owner : Nat) : Principle where + key := ⟨owner,1⟩ + activity := .assessment + declaredMethod := localMethod + applicable s := s ∈ ownSubjects owner + inquiry := inquiryFor + reasons := reasonsFor + limits _ := [0] + meaning := finiteMethodMeaning .assessment + +def ownRules (owner : Nat) : List Principle := [generatingRule owner, assessingRule owner] + +/- Recorded verdicts are stated separately from the evaluator, so agreement has to be proved. -/ +def statedOutcome (activity : Activity) (s : Subject) : WorkOutcome := + match activity with + | .generation => .generated ⟨(inquiryFor s).currentMethod.testedInputs,(inquiryFor s).requestedScope⟩ + | .assessment => .assessment (match (inquiryFor s).kind with + | .revisionGrounds => .insufficient + | _ => .supportedWithinScope) + +def recordFor (rule : Principle) (s : Subject) : WorkRecord := + ⟨rule.key,s,rule.activity,rule.inquiry s,rule.reasons s,rule.limits s,statedOutcome rule.activity s⟩ + +theorem reasonsFor_nonempty (s : Subject) : reasonsFor s ≠ [] := by + cases s with + | system owner => simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + | principle owner id => simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + +theorem reasonsFor_target (s : Subject) : ∀ reason ∈ reasonsFor s, reason.target = s := by + intro reason h + obtain ⟨content, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp h + rfl + +theorem inquiryFor_target (s : Subject) : (inquiryFor s).target = s := by + cases s with + | system owner => rfl + | principle owner id => rfl + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> rfl + +/- This proof includes the actual negative revision evaluation for both principle identities. -/ +theorem ownContentEvaluates (activity : Activity) (s : Subject) : + statedOutcome activity s = finiteMethodResult activity (inquiryFor s) (reasonsFor s) [0] := by + cases activity with + | generation => rfl + | assessment => + cases s with + | system owner => rfl + | principle owner id => rfl + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> rfl + +theorem ownRegistryCoherent (owner : Nat) : RegistryCoherent (ownRules owner) := by + intro p hp q hq hkey + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hp hq + rcases hp with rfl | rfl <;> rcases hq with rfl | rfl + · rfl + · have bad := congrArg PrincipleKey.localId hkey; contradiction + · have bad := congrArg PrincipleKey.localId hkey; contradiction + · rfl + +theorem ownTargetResolved (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + TargetResolved (ownRules owner) s := by + simp only [ownSubjects, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hs + rcases hs with rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl <;> + simp [TargetResolved, ownRules, generatingRule, assessingRule] + +theorem ownTargetContent (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + TargetContentResolved (ownRules owner) (inquiryFor s) := by + simp only [ownSubjects, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hs + rcases hs with rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl <;> + simp [TargetContentResolved, inquiryFor, ownRules, generatingRule, assessingRule] + +theorem ownRecordValid (owner : Nat) (rule : Principle) (hr : rule ∈ ownRules owner) + (s : Subject) (ha : rule.applicable s) : + ValidApplication (ownRules owner) rule s (recordFor rule s) := by + have hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl + · exact ha.1 + · exact ha + have hq : rule.inquiry = inquiryFor := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hg : rule.reasons = reasonsFor := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hl : rule.limits s = [0] := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hm : rule.meaning = finiteMethodMeaning rule.activity := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + refine ⟨hr, ha, rfl, rfl, ownTargetResolved owner s hs, rfl, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_⟩ + · change (rule.inquiry s).target = s + rw [hq]; exact inquiryFor_target s + · change TargetContentResolved (ownRules owner) (rule.inquiry s) + rw [hq]; exact ownTargetContent owner s hs + · change rule.reasons s ≠ [] + rw [hg]; exact reasonsFor_nonempty s + · change ∀ reason ∈ rule.reasons s, reason.target = s + rw [hg]; exact reasonsFor_target s + · change rule.meaning (rule.inquiry s) (rule.reasons s) (rule.limits s) (statedOutcome rule.activity s) + rw [hm, hq, hg, hl] + exact ownContentEvaluates rule.activity s + +def completeOwnWork (owner : Nat) : List WorkRecord := + (ownSubjects owner).flatMap fun s => + if generationEligible s then [recordFor (generatingRule owner) s, recordFor (assessingRule owner) s] + else [recordFor (assessingRule owner) s] + +theorem assessingRecord_member (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + recordFor (assessingRule owner) s ∈ completeOwnWork owner := by + apply List.mem_flatMap.mpr + refine ⟨s,hs,?_⟩ + cases generationEligible s <;> simp + +theorem generatingRecord_member (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) + (hg : generationEligible s = true) : recordFor (generatingRule owner) s ∈ completeOwnWork owner := by + exact List.mem_flatMap.mpr ⟨s,hs,by simp [hg]⟩ + +theorem completeOwnWork_reflexive (owner : Nat) : + Reflexive owner (ownRules owner) (completeOwnWork owner) := by + refine ⟨ownRegistryCoherent owner, ?_⟩ + intro rule hr s _ ha + refine ⟨recordFor rule s, ?_, ownRecordValid owner rule hr s ha⟩ + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl + · exact generatingRecord_member owner s ha.1 ha.2 + · exact assessingRecord_member owner s ha + +theorem ownAssessmentPerformed (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + Performed (completeOwnWork owner) s .assessment := + ⟨recordFor (assessingRule owner) s, assessingRecord_member owner s hs, rfl, rfl⟩ + +def applicationRule : Principle := + { assessingRule 0 with key := ⟨0,0⟩, applicable := fun s => s = .process 0 0 .application } + +def applicationWork : List WorkRecord := [recordFor applicationRule (.process 0 0 .application)] + +theorem applicationWork_reflexive : Reflexive 0 [applicationRule] applicationWork := by + constructor + · intro p hp q hq _ + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hp hq + rw [hp,hq] + · intro rule hr s _ ha + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst rule + change s = .process 0 0 .application at ha + subst s + refine ⟨recordFor applicationRule (.process 0 0 .application), by simp [applicationWork], ?_⟩ + refine ⟨by simp, rfl, rfl, rfl, ?_, rfl, rfl, rfl, ?_, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_⟩ + · exact ⟨applicationRule, by simp, rfl⟩ + · exact ⟨applicationRule, by simp, rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact reasonsFor_nonempty _ + · exact reasonsFor_target _ + · change statedOutcome .assessment (.process 0 0 .application) = finiteMethodResult .assessment (inquiryFor (.process 0 0 .application)) (reasonsFor (.process 0 0 .application)) [0] + exact ownContentEvaluates .assessment _ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem applicabilityRetained (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : + (Reflexive owner rules records → ReflexiveScope owner rules records) ∧ + (ReflexiveScope owner rules records ↔ + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → (¬ rule.applicable s ∨ Performed records s rule.activity)) ∧ + (Reflexive 0 [applicationRule] applicationWork ∧ + ¬ Performed applicationWork (.system 0) .assessment) := by + classical + refine ⟨Reflexive.toScope, ?_, applicationWork_reflexive, ?_⟩ + · constructor + · intro h rule hr s hs + by_cases ha : rule.applicable s + · exact Or.inr (h rule hr s hs ha) + · exact Or.inl ha + · intro h rule hr s hs ha + exact (h rule hr s hs).resolve_left (not_not_intro ha) + · rintro ⟨record, hm, ht, _⟩ + simp only [applicationWork, List.mem_singleton] at hm + subst record + cases ht + +end CoreReader.Agency diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml b/lean/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml similarity index 79% rename from lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml rename to lean/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml index c5190a2..a9f2c99 100644 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -name = "CoreReader" +name = "core_reproof" version = "0.0.1" defaultTargets = ["CoreReader"] [[lean_lib]] diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain b/lean/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain similarity index 100% rename from lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain rename to lean/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain diff --git a/lean/philosophy/manuscript.json b/lean/philosophy/manuscript.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9c40cad --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/manuscript.json @@ -0,0 +1,653 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "repository_root": "../..", + "source_current": { + "path": "../../PHILOSOPHY.md", + "sha256": "226fa3522943955d5a0f1f0b88e883c97b3505b3bcfd285329e432757912543f" + }, + "proof_targets": { + "path": "targets.json", + "sha256": "2400383120ab2d98454597a73cdcaaadf45b8e47b18a646118708dc5d81da2a4" + }, + "code_files": [ + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean", + "sha256": "b0dca4187a88a0a0f33c3dd6a11bb383907603ef514e80e9e3f09f95ce9633e2" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean", + "sha256": "07cf17f73802bdd34ae00ecba317ddc0283321cce00f15a84b69df421c3fe25f" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean", + "sha256": "18beb2b94450fdab36229b645e2df129348f3e67306104e842e0dce6e72443e8" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean", + "sha256": "b5ba8617e06f03963c4284344fbe3c662188f1b88542c55cc15beb1cd5f99c03" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean", + "sha256": "6b70be8964763b6447a2603bde665ff58106678f2e1d421bebd8c6b29ae46e04" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean", + "sha256": "25292faa71c5585a8f50cb07d72c2f44fa12dcfb125b2b92094f9306fecb4fd0" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader.lean", + "sha256": "80eee78ec3453fefdb26d3dbce97f0447d4b9ffeb4683604dad0c03902a1bfdd" + } + ], + "review": { + "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", + "sha256": "d6c6c7414736e26558ddfe620f1b3db45743f45b967c36b348aecf991bc15779" + }, + "views": { + "overview_en": { + "path": "overview.md", + "sha256": "9fbeb16d59c36789b578cd3df1f5e88559c82b243801c83d84df0855997866d7" + }, + "details_en": { + "path": "details.md", + "sha256": "b84342748d5cc5df26db610d7ab53cf8e553922f1847091be9b49d9bbbfb004a" + }, + "overview_zh": { + "path": "../../zh/lean/philosophy/overview.md", + "sha256": "4ff68caa6bb800d5a7adfce0538bb01b3a4c95afa3be78ce25167c8739c6b26b" + }, + "details_zh": { + "path": "../../zh/lean/philosophy/details.md", + "sha256": "1810b4d6800f4dd98699bf17db168718f22a0e3146ad7ecc90810c65cb4f84fe" + } + }, + "entries": [ + { + "id": "organon.preamble.p1", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This declares textual authority and adopted-commitment scope, not a mathematical proposition about all systems. The review retains this boundary without manufacturing a Lean theorem of authority.", + "context_only": true + }, + { + "id": "organon.preamble.p2", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](rationale/README.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The shared model exhibits compatible constraints without a chapter-priority inference. Authority of meanings and limits, the role of Rationale and revisability of actual skills remain textual commitments outside this finite witness." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "unit": "organon.charter", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity**", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a structural list of three headings. It organizes substantive provisions and requires no fabricated theorem." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p2", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "jointWitness combines valued expansion, revisability, contextual consistency and contentful owned principle work in one inhabited system. It proves model satisfiability, not actual compliance by arbitrary systems." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p3", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The three requirements remain distinct predicates with a shared example and specific nonentailments. Their interpretation as philosophical obligations and their full conditions in arbitrary applications are not derived from the example." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "Generative specifies valuation and revisability of current forms. The finite tags and state examples do not characterize every form of understanding, construction or intrinsic orientation." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The neutral-policy counterexample separates permission for distinct versions from the adopted valuation predicate. It does not establish what every real system values or justify the adopted value universally." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "All five represented form kinds, including organization, method and principle, fall under conditional revisability; a constant trace shows no progress guarantee. The chosen representation is not an exhaustive ontology or an executed revision." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits", + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The same before/after states increase inventory, abstraction and vocabulary without adding represented capabilities. Actual performance records can distinguish a genuine extension in a two-case world; empirical reliability beyond that world is not proved." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits.p2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously.\n- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement.\n- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation.\n- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits", + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Bound execution exhibits separate external dependencies, grounded stability, a nonimproving trace and a refuted owned announcement. These are finite compatibility and failure examples; philosophical adoption and real autonomous development remain outside their conclusions." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency", + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The general semantic theorem prevents opposite consequences under one theory/context when an admissible world exists. Existence of such a world, choice of questions and interpretation of held judgments are explicit modeling conditions, not guaranteed for reality." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences", + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Concrete retraction slices can reverse judgments, and a conditional reporting specification disallows concealing recognized change. No automatic detector, adequate report generator or real revision history is established." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning.p2", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences", + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Separate assumption, meaning and scope changes admit different judgments; hidden changes fail the adopted report condition. This covers explicit semantic models, not every practical ambiguity or method of concealment." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions.\n- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction", + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Finite witnesses distinguish tension from contradiction and consistency from truth or completeness. Refusing to retain a demonstrated conflict is a conditional consequence of an adopted consistency requirement, not an implemented revision strategy." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "Reflexive quantifies applicable owned rules and subjects, with coherent keys and meaningful application records. The concrete rule set has generation and assessment work but does not cover every possible real principle." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "The revised module models formation purposes, requested applicability scopes and revision counterexamples with actual evaluation and generation outcomes. These finite inquiry contracts do not establish the correctness or completeness of every assessment methodology." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability.\n- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness.\n- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive", + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption", + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained", + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Applicability is retained, self-exemption fails where conditions hold, and finite self-tests plus a produced revision fail to establish universal support. The owned records and source identities are mathematical objects, not authenticated execution histories." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Grounds checks identified applicable facets of the same claim; support, entailment and an option-indexed value procedure carry distinct responsibilities. This is a chosen formal interface and finite fulfillment examples, not a universal sufficient criterion for all philosophical grounds." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Articulation content is linked to each facet and separated from its discharge; union and missing-aspect examples prevent labels from waiving represented duties. Identifying every actually relevant aspect remains an application responsibility not solved by the datatype." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. |\n| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. |\n| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. |", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The three modeled adapters check observational compatibility/support, semantic entailment, and value reasons with limits/consequences/criticism. Actual relevance, empirical uncertainty and the adequacy of value criticism beyond the chosen cases are not exhaustively formalized." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "JointAdoption requires consistent instantiated starting commitments without proving all starting assumptions. A two-reason example and heterogeneous facets avoid a universal numerical scale. They demonstrate procedural consistency, not ultimate value justification." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference", + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A proper local observation scope supports a local function claim while admitting a counterexample outside it. This establishes the specified nonentailment; it neither identifies all relevant real differences nor rules out justified wider evidence." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference", + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Repeated irrelevant measurements fail support, while a valid inferential assessment needs no empirical chain. This refutes a universal mandatory chain within the represented responsibilities but does not characterize every framework or measurement practice." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference", + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A single observation has limited support and distinct trial outcomes preserve a fixed bound. Verification, reproducible conditions and conclusion stability use separate predicates; no probability distribution or general reproducibility law is proved." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer", + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment", + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Output-only and explanation-bearing contracts concern the same process and each has its own checked Grounds; applicationVariation changes the actual objective and invalidates old evidence. No uniform real mastery or capability-level definition is derived." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer", + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment", + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A distinct assessor role supplies a proof about the exact output process while no explanation certificate is attached; duplicating four inventory kinds leaves represented capability unchanged. Role numbers and certificates do not prove external provenance or human-like understanding." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails", + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The adopted choice interface requires feasibility and an objective/value/constraint-linked reason and rejects status-only reasons. Its finite reason vocabulary and concrete feasibility checks do not supply a general theory of warranted real implementation choice." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails", + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Two independent policies share a correct negative audit but differ on the added choice norm, establishing independence from the represented assessment procedure. This does not show an unsupported priority claim fully satisfies general Grounds, or derive a value commitment from neutral facts." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective.\n- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation.\n- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds.\n- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible", + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal", + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons", + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Concrete cases have one feasible candidate, unequal implementations, local agreement with wider difference and four eligible internal reasons. A cheap wrong-output method shows eligibility alone is insufficient. These results concern selected candidates and contracts, not all methods." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "unit": "organon.relationships", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice", + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "One shared model combines the charter and Grounds and assigns five commitments distinct operational reasons, limits and live criticism. Specified nonentailments prevent chapter order from doing logical work; neither the universal adoption nor ultimate justification of all commitments follows." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p2", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice", + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Consistency/support and orientation/capability remain separate; changing an application objective changes its actual claim and can defeat retained evidence. Universal application compliance is only an assumed conditional interface, not an achieved fact." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p3", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice", + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Contentful self-application, exact own-capability assessment, the general Grounds provision and the same current philosophy method are linked in the model. Their checked coexistence supplies no self-proof, real execution guarantee or unconditional applicability." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.terms.p1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "| Term | Meaning in this philosophy |\n| --- | --- |\n| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. |\n| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. |", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "FormKind includes organization, methods and principles, and an inferential assessment has no executable-test requirement. These representations illustrate the terms without exhaustively defining every existing form or every non-test assessment." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/overview.md b/lean/philosophy/overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a53a9d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,1158 @@ +# Philosophy and Lean: claim overview + +This reader follows 28 frozen targets. Target acceptance, Lean checking and source fidelity are separate judgments. Defining a duty does not establish its fulfillment; a finite model does not establish universal real-world correctness. The tracing appendix retains all 33 source paragraphs and two empty headings. + +`accepted` records acceptance of a target within its stated scope; `limited` retains a bounded formal correspondence for a source paragraph; `incomplete` retains material without a complete source proof. Lean `passed` reports checking of registered declarations; checking a normative interface is not fulfillment of its duty. + +[Other granularity](details.md) · [Frozen targets](targets.json) · [Review and exposure record](reviews/README.md) · [Actual declaration types](evidence/declaration-types.json) + +| Target | Claim | Kind | Target review | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| [T01](#t01) | Authority and boundaries | boundary | accepted | +| [T02](#t02) | A shared nonempty model | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T03](#t03) | Generative commitment | specification | accepted | +| [T04](#t04) | Permission does not supply valuation | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T05](#t05) | Revisability and progress | theorem | accepted | +| [T06](#t06) | Generation has limits | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T07](#t07) | Achievement needs matching grounds | theorem | accepted | +| [T08](#t08) | Whole-theory consistency | theorem | accepted | +| [T09](#t09) | Revision and context changes | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T10](#t10) | Changes must be acknowledged | theorem | accepted | +| [T11](#t11) | Tension and contradiction | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T12](#t12) | Consistency is not truth or coverage | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T13](#t13) | Reflexive work with actual inquiry and reasons | specification | accepted | +| [T14](#t14) | Self-application is not self-proof | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T15](#t15) | Support, strength and scope | theorem | accepted | +| [T16](#t16) | All applicable aspects retain duties | theorem | accepted | +| [T17](#t17) | Articulation, repetition and assertion are insufficient | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T18](#t18) | Adopted value positions and joint reasons | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T19](#t19) | Local evidence and omitted differences | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T20](#t20) | Observation, reproduction and stability | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T21](#t21) | Capability contracts and external assessment | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T22](#t22) | Relevant implementation reasons | theorem | accepted | +| [T23](#t23) | An accurate assessment does not enforce the extra choice norm | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T24](#t24) | Openness does not imply equivalence or plurality | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T25](#t25) | Mutual application in one system | theorem | accepted | +| [T26](#t26) | Distinct commitments and their combination | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T27](#t27) | Application duties and individual reasons | theorem | accepted | +| [T28](#t28) | Assessment without observation tests | satisfiability | accepted | + + +## T01 · Authority and boundaries + +The adopted English source, including its meanings, applicability and limits, remains the authority against which this formalization is compared. + +**Premises and representation:** This entry records the selected source and documentary boundary; it has no required Lean declaration. + +**Proof or check:** The target catalog records the source units and their boundary status. There is no mathematical derivation of the authority or adoption of the philosophy. + +**Limits:** Source correspondence and acceptance of a philosophical position are separate from kernel checking. Neither the catalog nor the proofs establish universal philosophical correctness. + +**State:** accepted (boundary). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.preamble#p1](#source-organon-preamble-p1), [organon.preamble#p2](#source-organon-preamble-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p1](#source-organon-charter-overview-p1), [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t01) + + + +## T02 · A shared nonempty model + +One explicitly inhabited System and World jointly carry the charter, its own supported output capability, relevant implementation choice, and grounds for each of five represented commitments. + +**Premises and representation:** The witness is actualSystem at actual = (identity, apply). The world type independently varies two implementations and two governance modes. Its context includes the system theory, observation assumptions and application scope; the contracts and assessment adapters are explicit model choices. + +**Proof or check:** jointWitness supplies that same pair throughout, using actualAdmissible, charterChecked, ownCapabilityGrounded, identityJustified and reasonsBelongToCommitments. The existential conclusion also identifies the witnesses by equality. + +**Limits:** This proves coexistence in the disclosed application model, not correctness of every possible system or independent validation of the adopted normative criteria. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.preamble#p1](#source-organon-preamble-p1), [organon.preamble#p2](#source-organon-preamble-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t02) + + + +## T03 · Generative commitment + +Generative is defined as valuing expanded understanding and construction, together with revisability of every form that the policy treats as current. + +**Premises and representation:** The parameter is a Policy with worthPursuing, current and revisable predicates. The revisability clause applies to forms satisfying current; permitsVersion is a separate field. + +**Proof or check:** The declaration is a conjunction defining an obligation. Later concrete policies instantiate it; the definition itself is not a theorem that any agent satisfies it. + +**Limits:** The representation does not establish that the valued aim is ultimately good, that every permitted edit advances it, or that a current form must be changed immediately. + +**State:** accepted (specification). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3), [organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-orientation-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-non-finality-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t03) + + + +## T04 · Permission does not supply valuation + +Permission to change a version can hold while the generative valuation is absent. + +**Premises and representation:** The concrete neutral policy permits versions but assigns no worth to the expansion aim; Generative retains its valuation conjunct. + +**Proof or check:** permissionNotValuation evaluates the permission and unfolds Generative to refute its missing valuation clause. + +**Limits:** This is a counterexample to an implication between represented predicates; it does not justify either policy or classify all real permissions. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-orientation-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t04) + + + +## T05 · Revisability and progress + +Generative policies leave current forms revisable, while the concrete open policy can remain generative through a trace with no capability expansion. + +**Premises and representation:** The general revisability result assumes Generative and that the selected form is current. The example covers organization, method, principle, appearance and artifact, and uses a constant base-state trace. + +**Proof or check:** revisabilityCovers projects the revisability obligation. revisionWithoutProgress instantiates the open policy and shows that adjacent identical states contain no newly understood or constructed operation. + +**Limits:** Revisability and permission are not evidence that revision occurred or improved capability. The result is not a universal claim that revision never yields progress. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-non-finality-p1), [organon.relationships.terms#p1](#source-organon-relationships-terms-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t05) + + + +## T06 · Generation has limits + +One generating system illustrates non-progressing inflation, dependence on three external resources, a justified stable action within its application budget, and a false expansion report about its own actual transition. + +**Premises and representation:** The system combines openPolicy, baseState, assistedExecution, required copy capability and an inventory budget of 1. inflatedState duplicates artifacts, abstraction layers and vocabulary without adding understood or constructed operations. Its report names this owner, before/after states and successor at input 0 with expected output 1. + +**Proof or check:** generationLimits evaluates the same system interface: available resources yield 6, deleting any of experience/knowledge/collaborator or all three yields none; the stable action preserves the current state, required capability and budget. Inflation exceeds that budget, and the system-generated report fails because its claimed new operation is absent. + +**Limits:** The resource dependence and budget are declared application conditions. These content-bearing examples do not establish universal laws of learning, mandatory austerity, or the adequacy of any real expansion report. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t06) + + + +## T07 · Achievement needs matching grounds + +AchievementAccountability requires Grounds for the very achievement claim. Given support and an actual evidence-compatible world, that claim holds there; a concrete expansion case has matching grounds, while its positive self-report alone does not support it. + +**Premises and representation:** The general theorem takes a world type, achievement predicate, records, actual world, Compatible records actual and Supports records achievement. Separately, the concrete alternatives share baseState and input 0: extend adds successor, whereas inflate only duplicates content. + +**Proof or check:** achievementNeedsSupport applies support to the compatible actual world and includes ConcreteAchievementExample. Actual after-state performance distinguishes extend and supplies canonical matched grounds; the positive report is also compatible with inflate, where Expanded before after is false. + +**Limits:** The definition expresses normative accountability without making observation universally mandatory. The theorem assumes support in its general branch and does not infer it from an arbitrary assertion or prove real achievement from record labels. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2), [organon.grounds#p1](#source-organon-grounds-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p1](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p2](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t07) + + + +## T08 · Whole-theory consistency + +An inhabited common theory and context cannot semantically yield both answers to one question. Separately satisfiable assumptions may nevertheless become inconsistent when held together. + +**Premises and representation:** consequenceConsistency quantifies over world and question types, a held theory and one Context, and assumes an Admissible world satisfying the entire held theory, contextual assumptions and scope simultaneously. + +**Proof or check:** The general proof evaluates both consequences at the same witness to obtain a contradiction. jointConflict combines P, P implies Q, and not Q: each singleton has a model, but their union has none. + +**Limits:** The nonempty witness is essential to this semantic consistency argument. Pairwise or isolated checks do not establish joint satisfiability, and no empirical truth of the assumptions is inferred. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t08) + + + +## T09 · Revision and context changes + +Different time-indexed theories can give opposite answers without either being unsatisfiable; changing assumptions, question meaning or scope can likewise change the answer. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples fix explicit Boolean interpretations and separately inhabited contexts. The positive and negative answers belong to different theory slices or contexts, not one unchanged conjunction. + +**Proof or check:** revisionCanReverse constructs the two slices and shows their simultaneous union fails. contextDifferences separately changes the assumptions, meaning and scope components while evaluating the corresponding consequences. + +**Limits:** These examples distinguish revision and contextual difference from simultaneous contradiction. They do not establish that a particular revision is warranted, truthful or progressive. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t09) + + + +## T10 · Changes must be acknowledged + +Under TruthfulReport, a semantic change or a different revision identity requires a positive change report. Reordering the same held content does not change that content, and honest reporting does not make revised assumptions true. + +**Premises and representation:** The general result assumes two snapshots, a report flag, the TruthfulReport obligation and an actual semantic-or-identity change. SameContent compares held claims, contextual assumptions, meaning and scope extensionally. + +**Proof or check:** semanticChangeMustBeReported applies the assumed reporting obligation; representationOrderIrrelevant proves union commutativity. hiddenContextChangeRejected evaluates separate hidden assumption, meaning, scope and identity changes, and an acknowledged revision false at the designated actual world. + +**Limits:** The reporting rule is adopted, not derived from logic alone. The cases do not decide every possible form of revision or certify the quality of an acknowledged change. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t10) + + + +## T11 · Tension and contradiction + +Distinct resource objectives can be jointly satisfiable. In contrast, positive and negative consequences for the same question in the same theory and context violate Consistent. + +**Premises and representation:** The tension example uses the predicates 4 ≤ budget and budget ≤ 6. conflictRequiresChange takes an arbitrary theory, context and question together with both opposed consequences. + +**Proof or check:** tensionWithoutContradiction supplies budget 5 and proves the predicates are different. conflictRequiresChange applies the definition of Consistent to the given pair of consequences. + +**Limits:** The latter theorem proves inconsistency; it neither constructs a repair nor determines which commitment should change. The resource example does not classify every practical tension. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t11) + + + +## T12 · Consistency is not truth or coverage + +Satisfiability does not establish truth at a designated actual world, and a satisfiable theory can leave an explicit question undecided. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples use Boolean worlds: the singleton assumption that the world is true, and the empty theory with the question whether the world is true. + +**Proof or check:** consistentFalse supplies the true model and refutes the singleton assumption at false. consistentIncomplete supplies models of the empty theory and uses opposite worlds to refute entailment of each answer. + +**Limits:** These are explicit satisfiability and non-entailment results, not an empirical classification of actual beliefs or a general incompleteness theorem for formal arithmetic. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-limits-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t12) + + + +## T13 · Reflexive work with actual inquiry and reasons + +Reflexive requires coherent principle registration and valid applications to every owned subject where each registered principle actually applies. A valid application carries the principle’s inquiry, reasons, limits and a result satisfying its independently specified meaning. + +**Premises and representation:** The parameters are an owner, registered principles and work records. ValidApplication binds principle identity, subject, generation/assessment activity, resolved target method, exact inquiry, nonempty target-matched reasons, limits and semantic result; applicability and ownership are explicit conditions. + +**Proof or check:** This declaration defines the obligation. The shared model’s completeOwnWork_reflexive supplies content-checked work for the system, two principles and their formation/application/revision processes; the evaluator uses actual samples, declared scope and counterexamples, and accepts an insufficient verdict for revision. + +**Limits:** Generation is required only for generationEligible subjects; application-phase processes receive assessment in this model. Valid work, including a negative verdict, does not prove the assessed principles correct or exhaust real reflexive inquiry. + +**State:** accepted (specification). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.reflexivity#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-p1), [organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t13) + + + +## T14 · Self-application is not self-proof + +An applicable owned subject cannot be omitted from a Reflexive work set, while inapplicable subjects need not receive work. Passing a selected self-test and generating a revision oneself do not establish universal correctness. + +**Premises and representation:** noSelfExemption assumes Reflexive, principle membership, matching owner and applicability. applicabilityRetained preserves those conditions. The counterexamples use the same arithmetic principle across test and claim, and a GeneratingProcess with owner 17, a false prior, seed 0 and its actual output revision. + +**Proof or check:** The general proofs extract valid work and its scope. The arithmetic principle passes at 1 but fails at 0. selfOriginDoesNotSupport includes the actual producer/prior/output relationship: its revision passes the input-0 observation but fails at 1, giving an evidence-compatible counterworld to allTrue. + +**Limits:** Scope coverage is weaker than full valid Reflexive work. The examples reject self-certification implications; they do not show all self-tests or self-generated revisions are worthless. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t14) + + + +## T15 · Support, strength and scope + +Grounds binds the same claim to all actually applicable represented facets and their actual articulations. With evidence fixed, support is preserved when the conclusion is weakened or its quantified scope is restricted. + +**Premises and representation:** Grounds takes a claim, facet-indexed articulations, an actualApplicable predicate and a nonempty list covering that predicate. Each listed facet must have that claim, be articulated, match its actual premises/reasons/limits, and pass its disclosed assessment adapter. supportWeakening assumes Supports records p and pointwise p implies q; scopeRestriction assumes a supported broad-domain conclusion and inclusion of the narrower domain. + +**Proof or check:** The obligation is defined, not universally proved. Both preservation proofs apply the original support at the same compatible world and then the implication or scope inclusion. The empirical, inferential and value articulation adapters expose the corresponding real record compatibility, theory or option-indexed reasons. + +**Limits:** These theorems weaken conclusions, not evidence. FacetDischarged and the canonical articulation are application-specific semantic adapters, not a complete definition or proof of all source-level empirical or value adequacy. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds#p1](#source-organon-grounds-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t15) + + + +## T16 · All applicable aspects retain duties + +Duties for two sets of applicable aspects combine exactly as their union, and an added label cannot waive them. A claim with empirical and value aspects can pass the represented empirical check while failing its value procedure. + +**Premises and representation:** assessmentUnion uses two actual facet predicates; labelsCannotWaive uses a label that does not alter those predicates or FacetDischarged. The mixed switch example concerns the same selected-on claim: an actual observation assesses the selection fact, while adoption also invokes the value procedure. + +**Proof or check:** The general proofs distribute universal obligations over disjunction and unfold the label wrapper. mixedMissingResponsibility combines discharged switch evidence with an unsupportedPosition whose empty reason list fails ValueProcedure. + +**Limits:** The empty-list failure establishes missing recorded procedural responsibility, not that no adequate value reason could exist. Which aspects actually apply remains an explicit input requiring source-faithful judgment. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t16) + + + +## T17 · Articulation, repetition and assertion are insufficient + +Articulation, repeated irrelevant observations, compatibility with a theory and self-assertion each fail to establish the stronger claim in explicit counterexamples. A nonempty announcement can coexist with a real budget violation. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples distinguish observable temperature from another output and observed selection from available budget. The budget model evaluates the same adopted option with cost 3; starting assumptions fix selection without guaranteeing budget. A true activation announcement is compatible with budget 0. + +**Proof or check:** articulationNotSupport supplies a nonempty but uninformative articulation. measurementRepeatNotSupport retains counterworlds after repeating the same actual tests. compatibilityNotEntailment contrasts an existing joint model with a failed universal consequence. selfAssertionNotReason includes both missing reasons and the nonempty announcement case whose joint adoption is possible but whose actual cost exceeds its budget. + +**Limits:** These are failures for specified claims and grounds, not a dismissal of articulation, repetition or compatibility. The missing-reasons branch is procedural; the budget branch additionally gives a substantive counterexample within its chosen objective/constraint adapter. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t17) + + + +## T18 · Adopted value positions and joint reasons + +A value-assessment procedure can be fulfilled from a satisfiable adopted starting position that is not entailed by the empty theory. Joint reasons can support the adopted option’s actual consequence even when neither reason alone suffices. + +**Premises and representation:** ValueProcedure requires nonempty option-indexed reasons; one world satisfying starting assumptions, limits, adoption and all reasons together; joint reason support for that option’s objective and constraints within starting/limits; and a nonempty response to relevant criticism. These are the declared option–outcome assessment conditions. + +**Proof or check:** valueWithoutSelfProof constructs the beneficial on option, shows its starting theory satisfiable and its commitment not entailed by emptyTheory, and rejects opposite, contradictory and impossible adoption variants. heterogeneousReasons includes actual empirical/inferential/value cases and a benefit-4/cost-at-most-3 example: the reasons together pass, but worlds (4,5) and (0,3) defeat each reason separately. + +**Limits:** The procedure checks a disclosed application adapter, not ultimate value justification or a mandatory deductive form for every value reason. A response string is recorded engagement, not proof of a satisfactory reply; non-self-derived starting points are distinguished from inconsistent starts. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t18) + + + +## T19 · Local evidence and omitted differences + +Agreement on the observed input can conceal disagreement elsewhere, so input-specific evidence does not support a universal claim. + +**Premises and representation:** Worlds are Boolean-valued functions on natural-number inputs. zeroRecord observes only that input 0 returns true; the compared functions are constant true and localGenerator 0. + +**Proof or check:** localNotUniversal retains localGenerator 0 as a record-compatible counterworld to allTrue. hiddenDifference proves agreement wherever n = 0 and evaluates the differing outputs at n = 1. + +**Limits:** The conclusion concerns the stated observation scope. It does not rule out justified generalization from additional premises or establish a general statistical inference rule. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.scope#p1](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p1), [organon.grounds.scope#p2](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p2), [organon.grounds.scope#p3](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t19) + + + +## T20 · Observation, reproduction and stability + +One observation can support a bounded claim without repetition; a valid inferential assessment need not use observation at all. Record accuracy, reproduced conditions and stability of a conclusion are distinct, and different outcomes can preserve the same bound. + +**Premises and representation:** The observation concerns input 0 only. The non-observational facet assumes n = 2 and concludes n + 1 = 3. Trial explicitly separates setting, actualOutcome and recordedOutcome; Verified compares actual and recorded values, Reproduced compares settings, and Bounded means actualOutcome ≤ 2. + +**Proof or check:** singleObservation proves local support and refutes allTrue. noUniversalChain supplies a discharged arithmetic facet without observation. variableOutcomesStableBound uses actual outcomes 1 and 2 under setting 0; verificationReproductionStability supplies separate cases with changed settings, inaccurate records and an outcome above the bound. + +**Limits:** This is a finite possible-trial model, not a probability theorem, empirical reproducibility study or guarantee about future runs. It refutes a universally mandatory observation chain only within the represented assessment interfaces. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.scope#p1](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p1), [organon.grounds.scope#p2](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p2), [organon.grounds.scope#p3](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t20) + + + +## T21 · Capability contracts and external assessment + +Correct outputs and an explanation contract are distinct for the same Process. Output-only and explanation-requiring applications have actual, scoped grounds; an external assessor can certify the former without the process providing an internal explanation. Duplicating inventory does not add represented operations. + +**Premises and representation:** OutputContract requires n + n for every natural input. ExplanationContract requires a provided Program whose evaluation equals that very process’s output at every input. processScope fixes the assessed process by equality; its canonical articulation and facet use that same scope and contract. ExternalCertificate is indexed by the actual process and distinguishes assessor 42 from assessed participant 7. + +**Proof or check:** Concrete evaluation proves both processes double their inputs; outputOnlyProcess has none, while explainedProcess supplies doubleInput. The same output-only process refutes the stronger full contract under its inhabited object scope. externalAssessment constructs the full output proof rather than assuming its truth; inventoryNotCapability proves available-operation membership unchanged by duplication. + +**Limits:** These arithmetic contracts are application choices, not a universal definition of capability or understanding. The explanation contract concerns an explicit certificate, not unobserved mental understanding; external participant identifiers do not establish real-world provenance. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.capabilities#p1](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p2](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t21) + + + +## T22 · Relevant implementation reasons + +Status alone cannot satisfy the represented implementation-choice norm. An existing conventional implementation can satisfy it when its actual behavior supplies a relevant reason and it meets the requirements. + +**Premises and representation:** JustifiedChoice requires feasibility plus a listed Relevant reason. The adopted Relevant definition excludes status reasons and checks actual method content against requirements. The concrete identity application requires identity outputs, budget 1 and admits the output reason. + +**Proof or check:** statusOnlyFails unfolds the status branch for any requirements, implementation and status reason. conventionWithReason evaluates the conventional/established identity implementation and constructs its output-based justification. + +**Limits:** The exclusion is an explicitly adopted choice norm, not a value-neutral theorem. This case neither rejects all existing implementations nor proves the chosen requirements universally adequate. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p1), [organon.grounds.implementations#p2](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t22) + + + +## T23 · An accurate assessment does not enforce the extra choice norm + +Two independently specified choice policies complete the same accurate negative status-priority audit yet differ on the additional choice norm: the status-only policy fails and the output-reason policy passes. + +**Premises and representation:** Both policies select identity and share the true conventional/established facts, the exact question whether those facts entail identity priority, and report false. Only priorityReasons changes. GeneralAssessmentFulfilled records articulation and accurate completion of this audit; AdditionalChoiceNorm separately checks JustifiedChoice. + +**Proof or check:** generalGroundsNotChoice retains the status non-entailment countermodel and includes PolicyIndependenceExample. The successor interpretation satisfies the same status facts but refutes priority; statusOnlyFails and identityJustified then establish the opposed policy results without changing that audit. + +**Limits:** The result concerns fulfillment of the specified assessment procedure, not full philosophical Grounds. Continuing to prioritize unsupported status can also violate general support proportionality; this theorem does not claim otherwise or prove the choice norm independent of every core obligation. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p1), [organon.grounds.implementations#p2](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t23) + + + +## T24 · Openness does not imply equivalence or plurality + +An open choice setting may have only one feasible represented candidate. Local agreement does not make implementations equivalent, and eligible internal-method reasons need not suffice for selection when a required output is wrong. + +**Premises and representation:** The candidate type contains identity and successor, evaluated against identity outputs and budget 1. Relevant internal reasons are selected by Requirements.values and checked for faithful explanation, applicability, cost or procedure. A separate cheap successor costs 1 but still returns n + 1. + +**Proof or check:** singleFeasible identifies the unique feasible candidate. localNotGlobal contrasts agreement at 0 with disagreement at 1. internalReasons validates four real reasons for identity and includes a cheap-but-wrong counterexample. openNotEquivalent retains justified identity choice while proving its output differs from successor. + +**Limits:** Uniqueness is relative to these two candidates and stated requirements. Relevance is not sufficient feasibility, and openness does not entail equal merit, mandatory plurality or rejection of the existing option. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t24) + + + +## T25 · Mutual application in one system + +The shared system maintains consistency through an acknowledged revision, carries owned assessment work and grounds for its own capability, assesses its general grounds provision, and evaluates its current philosophical method using relevant proposal decisions rather than status. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples use actualSystem and actual. The revised theory adds the same method’s input-0 fact and changes revision identity. GroundsProvision quantifies over arbitrary represented claims and facet packages under apply/waive permissions. The current philosophy method shares the system’s principle form and governance mode and is assessed on two specified proposal inputs. + +**Proof or check:** revisionKeepsConsistency reuses the same admissible witness and rejects a false change report. ownCapabilityGrounded combines owned assessment work with matching output grounds. groundsSelfAssessment evaluates the general provision through the grounds commitment’s actual acceptance/rejection consequences and relevant criticism. existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged proves acceptance of the valid proposal, rejection of the cheap wrong one, status-only failure and output-based justification for this actual method. + +**Limits:** These are constructed results for one system. Owned assessment work and capability grounds are separately checked components, not a claim that one work record contains the entire capability proof. Classical decision definitions are mathematical devices; the value adapter does not establish ultimate justification of the philosophy. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t25) + + + +## T26 · Distinct commitments and their combination + +Generative orientation alone does not ensure Reflexive work, and a charter-satisfying system can still present inadequate evidence for its own capability. A shared witness also shows the represented commitments can all be met together. + +**Premises and representation:** The first counterexample combines openPolicy with an empty work list despite an applicable system assessment. The second retains actualSystem, actual and its charter, but substitutes true cost-allowance evidence for the output-capability claim. jointWitness uses the matching capability evidence and complete owned work instead. + +**Proof or check:** generationNotReflexivity derives the missing applicable work from a supposed Reflexive proof. charterNotGrounds keeps a wrong-output world compatible with the cost record. jointWitness supplies one actual pair with admissibility, charter, capability duty, justified choice and each commitment’s grounds. + +**Limits:** These results establish the stated separations and coexistence, not complete pairwise logical independence of all commitments, a priority hierarchy, or automatic grounds for every charter-compliant claim. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t26) + + + +## T27 · Application duties and individual reasons + +An application that satisfies the adopted ApplicationDuties retains Reflexive work and all actually applicable, correctly articulated grounds for its own contract claim. Each of the five shared commitments separately has matched value grounds, joint adoption and relevant criticism, while its waive variant fails the chosen procedure. In the registered variation, the same evidence still supports the identity contract but does not support the changed successor contract. + +**Premises and representation:** applicationRetainsDuties takes a System, World, Requirements, arbitrary contract, facet-indexed articulations, applicability predicate and facet list, and assumes ApplicationDuties for those exact parameters. reasonsBelongToCommitments takes one of generation, consistency, reflexivity, grounds or choice; each position shares the governance choice but has its own actual consequence, reasons, constraints and criticism. + +**Proof or check:** The application theorem projects the assumed obligation, including same-claim equality and FacetArticulated for every listed facet. The commitment theorem constructs canonical grounds and joint witnesses, checks nonvacuous criticism, and contrasts apply with waive using actual operation expansion, contradiction handling, self-test coverage, evidence acceptance and implementation decisions. The supplementary applicationVariation case holds the system and observation fixed: the identity contract has matching grounds, whereas the successor contract fails at actual input 0 and its attempted empirical facet is rejected. + +**Limits:** The general application result does not prove arbitrary applications comply. The five reasons belong to distinct commitment positions in one selected option/outcome adapter; their checks do not derive normative authority from facts or prove all possible value reasons deductively sufficient. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t27) + + + +## T28 · Assessment without observation tests + +A matched inferential assessment can have Grounds without an observation test, while a separately applicable empirical facet still uses observations. + +**Premises and representation:** The inferential facet explicitly assumes n = 2 and concludes n + 1 = 3, with canonical articulation and a nonempty model. The empirical comparison is the actual switch observation facet; usesObservation classifies the facet form. + +**Proof or check:** nonExecutableAssessment builds Grounds for the arithmetic claim from its satisfiable premise and semantic entailment, proves usesObservation is false there, and includes the discharged empirical switch facet with usesObservation true. + +**Limits:** The theorem separates assessment from observational testing; it does not prove this arithmetic reasoning uncomputable, classify every non-executable method or waive applicable empirical responsibilities. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.terms#p1](#source-organon-relationships-terms-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t28) + + +## Source tracing appendix + + + + +### `organon.preamble#p1` + +```text +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: passed; fidelity: not_applicable. + + + +This paragraph is cited as authority and interpretive context. The linked declarations do not prove the meta-level statement; its conditions remain in force. + +This declares textual authority and adopted-commitment scope, not a mathematical proposition about all systems. The review retains this boundary without manufacturing a Lean theorem of authority. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02). + + + + + + +### `organon.preamble#p2` + +```text +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](rationale/README.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The shared model exhibits compatible constraints without a chapter-priority inference. Authority of meanings and limits, the role of Rationale and revisability of actual skills remain textual commitments outside this finite witness. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter` + +```text + + +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned. + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p1` + +```text +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +This is a structural list of three headings. It organizes substantive provisions and requires no fabricated theorem. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p2` + +```text +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +jointWitness combines valued expansion, revisability, contextual consistency and contentful owned principle work in one inhabited system. It proves model satisfiability, not actual compliance by arbitrary systems. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02), [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p3` + +```text +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The three requirements remain distinct predicates with a shared example and specific nonentailments. Their interpretation as philosophical obligations and their full conditions in arbitrary applications are not derived from the example. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02), [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1` + +```text +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Generative specifies valuation and revisability of current forms. The finite tags and state examples do not characterize every form of understanding, construction or intrinsic orientation. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1` + +```text +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The neutral-policy counterexample separates permission for distinct versions from the adopted valuation predicate. It does not establish what every real system values or justify the adopted value universally. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T04](#t04). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1` + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +All five represented form kinds, including organization, method and principle, fall under conditional revisability; a constant trace shows no progress guarantee. The chosen representation is not an exhaustive ontology or an executed revision. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T05](#t05). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1` + +```text +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The same before/after states increase inventory, abstraction and vocabulary without adding represented capabilities. Actual performance records can distinguish a genuine extension in a two-case world; empirical reliability beyond that world is not proved. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T06](#t06), [T07](#t07). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2` + +```text +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Bound execution exhibits separate external dependencies, grounded stability, a nonimproving trace and a refuted owned announcement. These are finite compatibility and failure examples; philosophical adoption and real autonomous development remain outside their conclusions. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T06](#t06), [T07](#t07). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency#p1` + +```text +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The general semantic theorem prevents opposite consequences under one theory/context when an admissible world exists. Existence of such a world, choice of questions and interpretation of held judgments are explicit modeling conditions, not guaranteed for reality. + +Related targets: [T08](#t08). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1` + +```text +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Concrete retraction slices can reverse judgments, and a conditional reporting specification disallows concealing recognized change. No automatic detector, adequate report generator or real revision history is established. + +Related targets: [T09](#t09), [T10](#t10). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2` + +```text +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Separate assumption, meaning and scope changes admit different judgments; hidden changes fail the adopted report condition. This covers explicit semantic models, not every practical ambiguity or method of concealment. + +Related targets: [T09](#t09), [T10](#t10). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1` + +```text +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Finite witnesses distinguish tension from contradiction and consistency from truth or completeness. Refusing to retain a demonstrated conflict is a conditional consequence of an adopted consistency requirement, not an implemented revision strategy. + +Related targets: [T11](#t11), [T12](#t12). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity#p1` + +```text +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Reflexive quantifies applicable owned rules and subjects, with coherent keys and meaningful application records. The concrete rule set has generation and assessment work but does not cover every possible real principle. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1` + +```text +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The revised module models formation purposes, requested applicability scopes and revision counterexamples with actual evaluation and generation outcomes. These finite inquiry contracts do not establish the correctness or completeness of every assessment methodology. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1` + +```text +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Applicability is retained, self-exemption fails where conditions hold, and finite self-tests plus a produced revision fail to establish universal support. The owned records and source identities are mathematical objects, not authenticated execution histories. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13), [T14](#t14). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds#p1` + +```text +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Grounds checks identified applicable facets of the same claim; support, entailment and an option-indexed value procedure carry distinct responsibilities. This is a chosen formal interface and finite fulfillment examples, not a universal sufficient criterion for all philosophical grounds. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T15](#t15). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p1` + +```text +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Articulation content is linked to each facet and separated from its discharge; union and missing-aspect examples prevent labels from waiving represented duties. Identifying every actually relevant aspect remains an application responsibility not solved by the datatype. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p2` + +```text +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The three modeled adapters check observational compatibility/support, semantic entailment, and value reasons with limits/consequences/criticism. Actual relevance, empirical uncertainty and the adequacy of value criticism beyond the chosen cases are not exhaustively formalized. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p3` + +```text +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +JointAdoption requires consistent instantiated starting commitments without proving all starting assumptions. A two-reason example and heterogeneous facets avoid a universal numerical scale. They demonstrate procedural consistency, not ultimate value justification. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p1` + +```text +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A proper local observation scope supports a local function claim while admitting a counterexample outside it. This establishes the specified nonentailment; it neither identifies all relevant real differences nor rules out justified wider evidence. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p2` + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Repeated irrelevant measurements fail support, while a valid inferential assessment needs no empirical chain. This refutes a universal mandatory chain within the represented responsibilities but does not characterize every framework or measurement practice. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p3` + +```text +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A single observation has limited support and distinct trial outcomes preserve a fixed bound. Verification, reproducible conditions and conclusion stability use separate predicates; no probability distribution or general reproducibility law is proved. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.capabilities#p1` + +```text +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Output-only and explanation-bearing contracts concern the same process and each has its own checked Grounds; applicationVariation changes the actual objective and invalidates old evidence. No uniform real mastery or capability-level definition is derived. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T21](#t21). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.capabilities#p2` + +```text +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A distinct assessor role supplies a proof about the exact output process while no explanation certificate is attached; duplicating four inventory kinds leaves represented capability unchanged. Role numbers and certificates do not prove external provenance or human-like understanding. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T21](#t21). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations#p1` + +```text +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The adopted choice interface requires feasibility and an objective/value/constraint-linked reason and rejects status-only reasons. Its finite reason vocabulary and concrete feasibility checks do not supply a general theory of warranted real implementation choice. + +Related targets: [T22](#t22), [T23](#t23). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations#p2` + +```text +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Two independent policies share a correct negative audit but differ on the added choice norm, establishing independence from the represented assessment procedure. This does not show an unsupported priority claim fully satisfies general Grounds, or derive a value commitment from neutral facts. + +Related targets: [T22](#t22), [T23](#t23). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1` + +```text +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Concrete cases have one feasible candidate, unequal implementations, local agreement with wider difference and four eligible internal reasons. A cheap wrong-output method shows eligibility alone is insufficient. These results concern selected candidates and contracts, not all methods. + +Related targets: [T24](#t24). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships` + +```text + + +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned. + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p1` + +```text +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +One shared model combines the charter and Grounds and assigns five commitments distinct operational reasons, limits and live criticism. Specified nonentailments prevent chapter order from doing logical work; neither the universal adoption nor ultimate justification of all commitments follows. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p2` + +```text +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Consistency/support and orientation/capability remain separate; changing an application objective changes its actual claim and can defeat retained evidence. Universal application compliance is only an assumed conditional interface, not an achieved fact. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p3` + +```text +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Contentful self-application, exact own-capability assessment, the general Grounds provision and the same current philosophy method are linked in the model. Their checked coexistence supplies no self-proof, real execution guarantee or unconditional applicability. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.terms#p1` + +```text +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +FormKind includes organization, methods and principles, and an inferential assessment has no executable-test requirement. These representations illustrate the terms without exhaustively defining every existing form or every non-test assessment. + +Related targets: [T05](#t05), [T28](#t28). + + + diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md b/lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c0959eb --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Review objects and interpretation + +The final [target review](code-targets-final.json) accepts 28 frozen targets within their represented scope. The [source entries](code-source-entries-final.json) separately retain 31 partial correspondences and two nonformal paragraphs; two empty headings are additional structural entries in the manuscripts. No source paragraph is upgraded to full correspondence from target acceptance alone. Definition-only source entries remain without a proof of actual fulfillment; their normative specification targets are reviewed as specifications. + +The [source-first initial assessment](source-initial.md) preceded new encoding. A different reviewer received a comment-stripped Lean project with only technical context and preserved the [initial blind account](code-blind-initial.md) before source disclosure. Its [first source comparison](blind-source-comparison-initial.md) and [first target judgments](blind-targets-initial.json) rejected 11 targets. The separate [source-first code comparison](source-comparison-initial.md) also retained its own rejected branches. + +The [final code comparison](code-comparison-final.md) is an informed revision review, not a second blind review. It independently checked the revised model, complete actual declaration types and the dependencies of all 411 named source declarations. The [other final source comparison](source-comparison-final.md) retains T13 as pending independent approval because that reviewer implemented the reflexivity repair. The separate final code reviewer supplies that independent review. Its [identity record](code-review-identity.json) identifies exact inputs and outputs; agreement alone does not establish philosophical correctness. + +T23 is accepted for the represented finite duty to assess the same reasons and claim accurately. It does not establish the stronger proposition that complete general Grounds, excluding Choice, is satisfied while unsupported status priority remains justified. The [pre-code design](choice-scope-design-before-code.md) and [scope correction](choice-scope-reconciliation.md) preserve the initial wording ambiguity, its subsequent clarification and the stronger result not established. Non-entailment from the status facts is not by itself a proof of absence of all possible value grounds. + +The preamble's authority statement is a background citation for T02. Its `context_only` role retains `not_applicable` for mathematical proof; it does not waive the source's authority or conditions. The frozen source/declaration mappings remain intact. Each proof target still has substantive source correspondence and actually checked declarations. + +Final line explanations are informed translations. The independent code reviewer wrote Agency, Reflexivity, Integration and the root file; a model author wrote Logic, Evidence and Choice using the reviewer's symbol descriptions and actual source. The initial blind text remains distinct. Both languages explain the same 2,474 nonblank lines; coverage is not a semantic guarantee. A subsequent reader QA found a T27 overstatement and syntax-only explanations of substantive proof lines. The [reader revision record](translation-revision.json) identifies the corrected four views and separate revised translation inputs. The earlier frozen translation artifacts in the code-review identity remain unchanged; they are not presented as the current line explanations. + +These public records are presentations of unchanged local originals. Host directory prefixes are replaced with descriptive labels so the current package has no machine-path dependency. [Derivation hashes](presentation-derivations.json) retain original and presentation identities. `Core/` denotes the Core tree; private-check labels identify historical evidence rather than required paths. The original freeze called the catalog `targets-frozen.json`; its target bodies are retained in [targets.json](../targets.json); the current source binding is covered by the separate migration review. Current builds and manuscript checks need no private history. + +## Current source migration + +The [2026-09-15 comparison](source-migration-2026-09-15.md) reviews the new source version and rationale path. Earlier initial and final review files keep their original objects and wording. The current fidelity object reuses their unchanged code, assumptions and target judgments only within that separate comparison; it does not relabel them as new blind reviews. The original preregistration and its catalog hash identify the preceding source-bound catalog; current target bodies are identical and the source binding is new. Historical source/run/readers replayed in a separate complete copy before replacement. + +The [provenance follow-up](source-migration-provenance-2026-09-15.md) covers the two required unit-hash comment changes in Integration.lean after the first current gate rejected stale provenance. The new code-file identity is recorded; all executable text and target bodies remain unchanged. The earlier byte-identity statement describes the object before this correction. diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-source-comparison-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..630c4e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-source-comparison-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,504 @@ +# 第一候选独立来源比较首案（冻结） + +日期：2026-09-14。评审代理：`/root/fresh_model_blind`。 + +## 结论及范围 + +28 个冻结目标：**accepted 17，rejected 11，pending 0**。第一候选的数学代码已编译成功；62 个冻结声明的实际完整类型与本代理先行盲读的代码逐项一致。拒绝结论是来源对应或冻结目标完成性判断，不是声称 Lean 已检查的定理为假、原文自相矛盾，或数学证明应证明所有价值立场为真。 + +本首案仅评估第一候选 `2026-09-14T02-57-54.555Z-9709-f08e31` 的固定 `project` 与 `declaration-types.json`，不得作为后续候选的批准。已完成盲读并冻结两份盲稿之后，才阅读指定权威来源、编码前独立清点、冻结目标与来源段落。没有读取作者判断、target-narratives、其他评审或正在变化的候选工程。没有改代码、哲学原文或既有盲稿，也没有再委派。 + +“accepted”表示这一冻结家族内要求的有限形式结果及解释边界得到满足，不是接受一切可能解释或证明整个哲学。明确规范接口的投影按规范后果接受；额外要求实质对应、内容性见证和非蕴涵分支时，不以接口字段存在或定理名称代替。不存在只因主题难于形式化便把已冻结 D/W 分支降为非定理的处理。 + +## 关键判断 + +1. **有限模型不是一般能力。** `Integration.World = Candidate` 只有 identity/successor。观察 input 0 能识别 identity，所以全输入能力随实现定义推出。这是有效的封闭模型推理，不是从单次测试归纳所有程序。T02 的这一共享能力/预算/观察/选择部分是真实交互，单独通过；拒绝该家族的原因是其他冻结分支未齐。 +2. **规范接口不是现实履行；但也不能丢掉规定的对象。** `Reflexive` 保留 owner/applicable 条件和两种活动；其 `Performed` 只是 pair 会员。作为明确规范覆盖投影可以接受，不能据此表示实际程序已运行。T13 另要求形成理由、适用域考察和修订理由，当前对象没有这些内容，故该分支未完成。 +3. **价值承诺不必被证明真，与理由必须对应立场是两回事。** 盲读已编译出恒 False commitment 的 ValueProcedure/Grounds；这本身不要求所有价值立场成为事实，更不是 Lean 推出 False。实质缺陷是 `ValueProcedure` 不读取 commitment/starting，替换任意不相关 commitment 不影响通过性。它只检验理由推出另一可任意指定的 consequence。T15/T25/T27 需要实际理由与当前立场的联系，不能由这一接口自动得到。修正应允许非演绎价值理由和未证起点，而不是强行要求理由逻辑证明承诺。 +4. **已有有限价值见证仍可通过。** T18 的 switchPosition 把所选 true 选项的成本/收益作为具体理由，起点另证可满足，批评世界有响应，并证明空理论不推出承诺。这一有限程序相容性目标成立，通用接口的较弱性不自动否定该具体存在见证。 +5. **事实优先命题与额外选择规范不可混同。** T23 当前证明“两个 status facts 不推出 selected=identity”；冻结问题是一般评估责任不推出额外的反 status-only 优先规范。现有反例没有独立可变 choice policy，也没有一般责任履行而该额外规范失败的同一模型，因而不能算规范独立性完成。 +6. **Grounds 条款自身不同于一次能力的 Grounds 满足。** `commitmentClaim .grounds` 是固定 `OwnCapabilityDuty capability [capabilityFacet]`。其观察理由支持该能力，却不是 Grounds 条款采纳/适用要求自身的理由。`existingPhilosophy` 也仅修改 identityImpl.name，没有连接到本模型的采纳政策或原则。因此 T25 的这些反身对象尚未对应来源。 +7. **不能用并列标签替代同一对象。** T06 中外部资源求和确实依赖三个 Option，但没有把该算法与 Generative 政策的系统执行/状态相连；稳定阈值没有连接到应用约束/动作；自述仅 `expanded=expanded`。T07 也尚未将通用 support 定理实例化为同一 before/after、基线、条件和成就主张。已有库存非扩展反例保留，其余分支须实际补齐。 +8. **不用额外提高已冻结有限例子的标准。** T08–T12、T16–T20、T22、T24、T28 的通过范围依各实际数学定义限定：例如 Q 可为空、解释力代理只是数值等同、procedure 只看末项、Trial 的复现只看 setting、非经验不等于不可计算。这些界限不能被宣传性名称扩大，但不自动推翻冻结的有限反例/接口后果。 + +## 28 项总表 + +| 目标 | 判定 | 理由 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| T01 | accepted | 来源、规范/事实及章节角色边界得到保留；本项通过仅表示边界和来源记录合格，不代表其余27项目全部实现。 | +| T02 | rejected | jointWitness确有非空数学见证，但其反身工作与各承诺理由未达到冻结的共享、内容对应模型；较弱接口的可满足性不能算所选Core规范已联合满足。 | +| T03 | accepted | Generative作为明确采纳的有限规范接口保留价值取向与当前形式可修订性，未内置必然变化或进步。 | +| T04 | accepted | 明确非空政策允许不同版本对，但完全不赋扩展价值，足以区分许可与价值取向。 | +| T05 | accepted | 通用kind/version覆盖和具体可修订却无扩展见证均成立；投影性质须如实标记。 | +| T06 | rejected | 数量与非进步分支有内容性见证；外部执行/稳定与同一系统状态的联系尚未建模，自称生成分支更只有构造器自等式，11分支未齐。 | +| T07 | rejected | 任意claim的support应用定理正确，但冻结要求的同一能力变化、基线和条件实例及取向/自述不提供其支持的反例没有完成。 | +| T08 | accepted | 通用语义与非空见证阻止同题正反结论；实际三前提冲突显示不能仅逐项检查。 | +| T09 | accepted | 时间切片撤回旧命题后保留相反命题的可满足性及联合冲突明确；三种上下文变化分别有非空见证。 | +| T10 | accepted | 单向报告规范、语义变化反例、表示顺序不变以及独立revisionIdentity触发均达到冻结的规范接口范围；并未实现自动检测。 | +| T11 | accepted | 两约束有共同可行值但非同一谓词；同条件正反后果明确违反一致性。修订责任是采纳规范的条件后果，未声称已实现修订算法。 | +| T12 | accepted | Bool模型具体区分可满足性与指定实际world真值，并给指定问题的双向非蕴涵；其现实重要性不由数学裁定。 | +| T13 | rejected | 系统/原则/三阶段和两类活动的条件覆盖已表达，但原则形成理由、适用域审查及修订理由仍只由活动标签代替，未完成冻结的完整规范对象。 | +| T14 | rejected | 适用性与有限检验反例通过；自产修订分支没有与同一主体/旧新对象关联的自我产生事实，仅演示任意局部生成函数的观察不足。 | +| T15 | rejected | 结论弱化与范围缩窄定理成立；完整Grounds规范中的价值理由对应当前claim仍无检查，不能以该较弱接口代表全部来源责任已保留。 | +| T16 | accepted | 面向义务的并集/标签不变和同一switch claim的经验＋价值缺责反例完整；规范接口局限另见T15。 | +| T17 | accepted | 所列不充分替代物有实际内容反模型；非蕴涵未被说成结论恒假。价值反例只证明所示理由/预算责任失败，不是价值真理。 | +| T18 | accepted | 具体switch价值立场有成本/收益理由、限度、非空批评响应及可满足起点，并未从空理论推出承诺；异类支持不用统一数值尺度。 | +| T19 | accepted | 实际观测域{0}是真子域，兼容函数在1表现不同，支持与非支持结论均由计算/反模型成立。 | +| T20 | accepted | 单次观察的有限支持、非经验推论及不同结果同范围结论、三概念分离都有实际有限实例；不声称概率或非计算性定理。 | +| T21 | rejected | 输出/附加解释合同的分离与四类库存复制正确；但冻结的两个应用均受Grounds、外部评估者供应可表达根据的同对象见证尚未构造。 | +| T22 | accepted | 在单独采纳的选择规范下，三类纯身份理由统一被排除；既有惯用identity仍以真实输出理由被接受。 | +| T23 | rejected | 现有定理证明status facts不蕴涵“选择identity”这一对象命题，而没有证明一般评估义务不蕴涵额外的反status优先规范；两种独立性目标不能混同。 | +| T24 | accepted | 冻结所需有限开放性例子均存在；选择接口的一般充分性仍很弱，不能从这些存在例子推导所有相关内部理由足以满足全部目标。 | +| T25 | rejected | 有真实模块交互的能力与一致性部分通过；Grounds条款自身、现有哲学同对象及原则过程的对应仍不足，不能以实例义务替代规范自身。 | +| T26 | rejected | 两个指定非替代方向有有效有限反例；完整联合正见证依赖T02仍缺失的对应关系，家族不能全部通过。 | +| T27 | rejected | labels不豁免固定例子的义务已证明；可变应用目标/能力及每项承诺自身理由的冻结范围尚未实现，字段等式不等于理由对应。 | +| T28 | accepted | 有实际n=2⇒n+1=3的结构化推论Grounds且无需经验测试，同时保留经验facet的观测责任。非经验不是不可计算。 | + +## 逐家族、逐分支依据 + +### T01 — accepted + +分类：N/E-V boundary。 + +实际前提与对象范围：权威文本为所指定PHILOSOPHY 0.1.3；其权威和采纳不是由Lean推出。source-paragraphs保留22源单元、全部段落/表格/限制；标题无伪造定理。 + +冻结声明：无（来源/规范边界项）。 + +来源：`organon.preamble/p1`, `organon.preamble/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p1`, `organon.charter.overview/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p3`。 + +- **authority — accepted**（`PHILOSOPHY.md:8; source-paragraphs.json`）：原文SHA与冻结目标一致。数学类型不包含“所有现实系统都遵守”或哲学普遍正确性结论。 +- **meanings-and-limits-record — accepted**（`source-paragraphs.json`）：22单元含义、条件、表格和bullet均作为来源保留；具体语义实现缺口在相应T项判定，不能由本项通过抹去。 +- **roles-and-headings — accepted**（`CoreReader.lean:1`）：Charter/Relationships标题未被制造为True定理；来源明确Rationale/Skills不增加核心义务，组合代码未赋章节顺序以演绎权威。 + +### T02 — rejected + +分类：W satisfiability plus N interpretation。 + +实际前提与对象范围：无外部实质参数；世界仅identity/successor；取actual=identity、固定openPolicy、固定held/context、预制十项work；value Grounds使用各自singleton适用面。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness`。 + +来源：`organon.preamble/p1`, `organon.preamble/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p3`, `organon.relationships.roles/p1`, `organon.relationships.roles/p2`, `organon.relationships.roles/p3`。 + +- **inhabited-world-and-judgments — accepted**（`Integration.lean:24-68,238-245`）：actual提供真实模型；held有能力和预算命题，观察在两个候选内识别identity，非空且非全真记录占位。 +- **shared-capability-and-choice — accepted**（`Integration.lean:101-116,238-245`）：相同implementation用于capability、budget、observation和output choice；这一部分确有模块交互，观察推广限于封闭候选类。 +- **principle-process-content — rejected**（`Agency.lean:192-207,253-269; Integration.lean:93-98`）：五个对象/两种活动确非空，但Performed仅pair会员关系，原则形成理由、适用域考察和修订理由没有可表达内容；预填记录不足以完成冻结的内容性对象分支。 最小修正条件：补充与这些subject相连的实际评估问题/理由/范围/结果对象，并用非空记录验证相应义务；不要求现实系统已经运行。 +- **individual-commitment-reasons — rejected**（`Integration.lean:130-180`）：generation理由是两函数在0输出不同，仅推出存在不同输入；Grounds承诺字段可任意重贴而ValueProcedure不变。因此联合对象尚未提供每项承诺自身理由。 最小修正条件：建立每项承诺与其理由、限度及批评响应的可审查联系，保留价值承诺不必被证明为事实的边界。 +- **no-priority-from-conjunction — accepted**（`Integration.lean:95,238-245`）：合取本身未推出章节优先级或普遍哲学正确性。 + +### T03 — accepted + +分类：N specification。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Policy四谓词独立；Aim为两标签，Form为五种类加Nat版本；规范后果是条件投影，不证明现实系统遵守。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.Generative`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.overview/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p3`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p2`。 + +- **orientation — accepted**（`Agency.lean:13-35`）：worthPursuing选择理解/构造扩展这一被采纳目标；与permitsVersion字段独立。 +- **nonfinal-current-forms — accepted**（`Agency.lean:5-21,33-35`）：∀current form→revisable覆盖组织/方法/原则及外观/产物；没有预装严格改善序列。 +- **no-actual-success-guarantee — accepted**（`Agency.lean:33-35,103-127`）：定义不含实际transition或Expanded证明；无进步trace提供边界。 + +### T04 — accepted + +分类：W nonentailment。 + +实际前提与对象范围：neutralPolicy继承全允许版本关系但worthPursuing恒False；版本0≠1由Nat计算。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation/p1`。 + +- **permissible-nontrivial-change — accepted**（`Agency.lean:37-51`）：允许0→1且0≠1；证明许可，不声称此变化已执行。 +- **valuation-independent — accepted**（`Agency.lean:43-51`）：Generative因所需价值取向为False而失败；不是将两个概念写成同一布尔量。 + +### T05 — accepted + +分类：N/D projection and W witness。 + +实际前提与对象范围：revisabilityCovers前提为Generative p及p.current指定form；无进步见证用独立恒定trace。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers`, `CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality/p1`, `organon.relationships.terms/p1`。 + +- **form-coverage — accepted**（`Agency.lean:5-11,58-59`）：任意五种form kind均受∀current→revisable规范约束，包含全部必要种类。 +- **projection-boundary — accepted**（`Agency.lean:58-59`）：只是将已采纳规范实例化，不是发明可修订性或执行修订；这正是冻结规范后果范围。 +- **revisable-without-progress — accepted**（`Agency.lean:116-127`）：openPolicy可修订与常值baseState trace并存，每步Expanded均假。 + +### T06 — rejected + +分类：W eleven branches。 + +实际前提与对象范围：generationLimits无参数，由具体常量计算；Generative policy、assistedExecution、State trace、Announcement彼此不通过系统/执行对象相连。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p2`。 + +- **a-orientation-without-progress — accepted**（`Agency.lean:123-127,157-171`）：有价值/非终局政策且base与inflated之间无理解/构造成员增加。 +- **b-more-artifacts — accepted**（`Agency.lean:107-114,160-161`）：同一before/after状态inventory复制，understood/constructed不变。 +- **c-more-abstraction-layers — accepted**（`Agency.lean:113,160-162`）：层级列表增加而同一状态的能力成员不增加。 +- **d-more-terms — accepted**（`Agency.lean:114,160-163`）：词汇列表增加而理解/构造成员不变。 +- **e-external-experience — rejected**（`Agency.lean:129-142,164-165`）：Option计算确实读取experience，缺失即none；但没有标明该计算是这项Generative系统的执行，结果也不进入其状态。合取任意外部函数仅证明相容，未满足冻结同一内容系统要求。 最小修正条件：将政策、被执行算法、资源和before/after或执行结果纳入同一对象，再展示experience缺失的实际失败。 +- **f-external-knowledge — rejected**（`Agency.lean:136-140,166`）：knowledge依赖计算正确；同e，缺少同一系统执行绑定。 最小修正条件：复用同一绑定执行对象，分别删knowledge验证失败。 +- **g-collaboration — rejected**（`Agency.lean:136-140,167`）：collaborator缺失的Option失败正确；其同一主体/执行含义未建模。 最小修正条件：在上述共享执行对象中保留协作槽及单独缺失反例。 +- **h-no-autonomous-execution — rejected**（`Agency.lean:168`）：⟨none,none,none⟩导致独立求和函数失败；没有该系统自主执行接口，不能把任意失败函数当其不能自主执行。 最小修正条件：明确这就是被评系统的执行接口，并把无外援调用关联其执行结果。 +- **i-no-self-improvement — accepted**（`Agency.lean:116,169`）：常值trace每步无Expanded；可作为所选无自我改善轨迹，不是所有系统永远不改善。 +- **j-grounded-stability — rejected**（`Agency.lean:145-147,170`）：StableReason给出构造内容相等和inventory越过阈值1，但没有稳定动作或被追求的预算/价值条件；阈值本身尚未关联该系统稳定选择的理由。 最小修正条件：把1作为明示应用约束，并证明保留当前状态的动作满足它且不丢所需能力，同时政策仍Generative。 +- **k-self-announcement-not-achievement — rejected**（`Agency.lean:149,171`）：expanded=expanded只是枚举构造器自等式，不是某系统对同一变化的announcement，也没有achievement-support的失败命题。 最小修正条件：定义带主体、before/after和claim的实际报告，构造报告生成而同一claim不成立/缺充分支持的反例。 + +### T07 — rejected + +分类：D conditional fragment with N accountability。 + +实际前提与对象范围：achievementNeedsSupport前提为Compatible records actual和Supports records achievement，结论直接应用support；AchievementAccountability完全等于Grounds。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability`, `CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p2`, `organon.grounds/p1`, `organon.grounds.capabilities/p1`, `organon.grounds.capabilities/p2`。 + +- **conditional-inference — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:113-115`）：对任意W及claim，支持加actual兼容性推出actual处claim；没有伪称实际可靠性已证明。 +- **same-change-baseline-scope — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:102-115; Agency.lean:103-105`）：未把achievement实例化为同一before/after的Expanded；没有对应基线、记录内容、条件或非空支持见证。 最小修正条件：给变化世界/记录及明确Expanded类claim，证明非空兼容性、支持和actual结论；保留通用定理。 +- **orientation-and-report-insufficiency — rejected**（`Agency.lean:157-171; Evidence.lean:113-115`）：generationLimits只给无Expanded和标签自等式，未建立对上述achievement的support失败。 最小修正条件：复用同一变化世界，构造有取向/报告但兼容反世界使支持失败。 +- **accountability-interface — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:89-104`）：别名能存对应claim但value分支允许理由/commitment脱离，不能作为完整成就规范接口的完成证据；也没有achievement实例履行。 最小修正条件：将实际成就的适用经验/推论面与同一claim绑定，检查匹配的Grounds；不要由规范接口宣称真实成就已获证。 + +### T08 — accepted + +分类：D theorem and W countermodel。 + +实际前提与对象范围：W,Q任意Type；Consequence在同一t/c所有Admissible worlds上量化；显式存在admissible world；Q空时Consistent空真是范围边界。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency`, `CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency/p1`。 + +- **simultaneous-and-implications — accepted**（`Logic.lean:4-26`）：Theory含全部选择命题，Entails/Consequence量化所有模型，包括实际蕴涵而非仅扫描字符串列表。 +- **same-context-noncontradiction — accepted**（`Logic.lean:31-35`）：同一admissible witness使正反结论矛盾；不存在证明现实理论必有model的隐藏步骤。 +- **joint-conflict — accepted**（`Logic.lean:50-69`）：三个单项分别有Bool-pair模型，联合P、P→Q、¬Q无法满足；关键反例内容真实。 + +### T09 — accepted + +分类：W retraction and context models。 + +实际前提与对象范围：revisionSlice 0选择true、1选择false；固定时间的held理论由函数决定，撤回表现为旧命题不在新切片。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse`, `CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p1`, `organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p2`。 + +- **retraction-and-opposite — accepted**（`Logic.lean:71-88`）：旧/新slice分别有true/false模型，联合无模型，编码的是撤回后的状态而非永久兼容要求。 +- **slice-consistency — accepted**（`Logic.lean:31-35,78-88`）：slice显式给Satisfiable而非直接Consistent；在空附加假设/全scope的自然问题上下文中，可由同一非空model一般定理得到一致性，未引入实质源外前提。 +- **assumption-change — accepted**（`Logic.lean:90-122`）：固定问题含义，仅世界假设true/false变化，正反后果各有admissible witness。 +- **meaning-change — accepted**（`Logic.lean:93-94,105-106,116-121`）：假设固定true，meaning改为等于true/false，反转判断而各context非空。 +- **scope-change — accepted**（`Logic.lean:95-96,107-108,118-122`）：假设为空、meaning固定，scope改选true/false；不要求跨context一致。 + +### T10 — accepted + +分类：N/D specification consequences plus W examples。 + +实际前提与对象范围：changed是¬SameContent或revisionIdentity不同；TruthfulReport是changed→report=true；规范本身是显式前提。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported`, `CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant`, `CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p1`, `organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p2`。 + +- **semantic-change-report — accepted**（`Logic.lean:124-144`）：held/context语义成员、meaning、scope差异均触发报告责任；报告真不反推变化，无不报告变化的许可。 +- **representation-order — accepted**（`Logic.lean:150-152`）：union两个singleton的顺序变化不改变命题集合；仅覆盖这种表示变化。 +- **hidden-context-changes — accepted**（`Logic.lean:160-179`）：分别对assumption/meaning/scope构造¬SameContent，使false报告违反规范。 +- **independent-revision — accepted**（`Logic.lean:127,136,164,179`）：同content但revisionIdentity从0到1也禁止false报告；外部已识别文字/形式修订必须由调用方赋正确identity，不宣称代码检测了全部变化。 +- **report-not-adequacy — accepted**（`Logic.lean:165-181`）：true报告仍与新assumption在true实际world不成立并存，不为修订内容背书。 + +### T11 — accepted + +分类：W witness plus D norm consequence。 + +实际前提与对象范围：具体预算约束4≤n和n≤6；反向定理显式给同一t,c,q的positive/negative Consequence。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction`, `CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.limits/p1`。 + +- **tension-without-conflict — accepted**（`Logic.lean:186-190`）：预算5同时满足不同上下界，0证明两谓词不等；有限模型展示不同目标不等于不可同时满足。 +- **conflict-requires-nonretention — accepted**（`Logic.lean:195-197`）：同题同context正反后果使Consistent失败；在采纳一致性规范下不能原样保留该状态。未提供哪一项应改的价值判断或算法。 + +### T12 — accepted + +分类：W truth and coverage separation。 + +实际前提与对象范围：第一例取false为所检查实际world、true为model；第二例空Theory但Bool非空，指定claim w=true及其否定。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse`, `CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.limits/p1`, `organon.relationships.roles/p1`, `organon.relationships.roles/p2`, `organon.relationships.roles/p3`。 + +- **false-assumption — accepted**（`Logic.lean:205-208`）：singleton w=true可满足但在指定false world不成立，足以展示一致理论不自动为实际真。 +- **undecided-relevant-question — accepted**（`Logic.lean:216-222`）：明确检验w=true这一选择问题，两个Bool模型使正反均不被emptyTheory蕴涵。问题被指定为关注对象；未证明任何现实问题的重要性。 + +### T13 — rejected + +分类：N specification; projections are not executions。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Reflexive对任意owner、rules、records条件量化；Performed仅pair会员关系；Principle只有activity/applicable；Subject只有owner/id/phase。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.reflexivity/p1`, `organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning/p1`, `organon.charter.reflexivity.limits/p1`。 + +- **objects-and-activities — accepted**（`Agency.lean:175-207,253-269`）：系统、原则、formation/application/revision过程均有独立constructor/phase；generation和assessment两个活动均在非空ownRules中。 +- **applicability-conditions — accepted**（`Agency.lean:206-216`）：owner和rule.applicable是独立条件；自我身份不取消已适用规则的记录义务。 +- **formation-reasons-scope-revision-reasons — rejected**（`Agency.lean:192-207,261-269`）：没有任何subject关联的形成理由、适用域考察或修订理由字段/问题/评估内容；十个预填活动pair无法区分“仅合规自查”与来源要求的多问题审查。 最小修正条件：增加最小的assessment-question/content接口并关联原则及对应phase；明确三个问题均在责任范围，以非空解释性记录/实例证明覆盖。无需证明现实评估已发生。 + +### T14 — rejected + +分类：D conditional projection and W boundary cases。 + +实际前提与对象范围：noSelfExemption假定Reflexive及适用性；selfTest测固定算术predicate；localGenerator由Nat seed生成函数，代码无revision/producer/owner关系。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption`, `CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained`, `CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve`, `CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.reflexivity.limits/p1`。 + +- **no-self-exemption — accepted**（`Agency.lean:213-216`）：对同owner且适用的rule直接得到要求的record；不把identity与applicability等同。 +- **nonapplicable-boundary — accepted**（`Agency.lean:228-251`）：application-only规则可被履行而system assessment缺失；说明不能忽略条件要求所有自应用。 +- **finite-self-test-not-universal — accepted**（`Agency.lean:287-304`）：实际all运算在[1]通过，0使n+1=2n失败；有限内部测试不提供普遍正确性。 +- **self-origin-of-revision — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:331-350`）：证明生成函数f只在0为true且zero observation不支持allTrue，但未表示它是某系统自身生成的修订，也无修订前对象。作为局部观察反例有效，作为冻结自产修订分支欠对象联系。 最小修正条件：增加最小producer/owner及before/proposed关系或共享系统构造，让其自身生成该candidate，并保留当前内容性support反模型。 + +### T15 — rejected + +分类：D semantic support fragment plus N Grounds。 + +实际前提与对象范围：支持在记录兼容世界中全称；weakening明确假定p→q，scopeRestriction假定narrow⊆wide及wide支持；Grounds由调用方给actualApplicable。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds`, `CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening`, `CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **same-claim-support — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:7-15,89-93`）：记录含实际test/result，经验/推论facet的claim与target必须相等；不是无解释support布尔字段。 +- **conclusion-weakening — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:123-132`）：假设同记录支持p及p→q，推出支持q；另有删记录会失支持反例，不混淆证据弱化。 +- **scope-restriction — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:140-144`）：将结论的量词域从wide缩为included narrow；不扩张观察域，也不补造现实可靠性。 +- **articulation-and-aspects — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:17-24,50-93`）：概念/假设/理由/限度可储存，facet对齐并要求所有声明适用面，经验加非空in-scope world排除矛盾观察空真。 +- **value-reason-correspondence — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:26-38,45-62`）：ValueProcedure不读取commitment或starting；替换任意不相关commitment不改变通过性。理由只需推出另一个任意consequence，不能确保陈述的是此立场的理由。False-commitment探针不是要求价值立场证明为真，而是揭示对应关系缺失。 最小修正条件：给可审查的立场/理由相关性与后果关系接口及非空实例，允许未证明的价值起点，拒绝不相关重贴和纯自断言；不必强制reason逻辑推出commitment。 +- **full-compliance-versus-interface — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:35-38,89-104`）：当前接口还允许空limits和恒定非空字符串使关键责任空真；原文保留适用性，但此代码不能由字段存在声称已经开放于相关批评。 最小修正条件：为作为完成见证的实例给实际适用世界和内容相关批评/响应，不把整个通用域强行设非空，也不将接口当现实履行证明。 + +### T16 — accepted + +分类：D union theorem and W mixed case。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Duties以任意Facet谓词为适用关系；labels在定义中无作用；mixed经验与价值facet的claim都为w=true。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion`, `CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive`, `CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **union-not-exclusive — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:146-160`）：Facet是单面向枚举，但适用关系可同时选多个facet，union定理合并义务而非强制单选。 +- **unlabeled-duty — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:148-168,208-214`）：空标签不改变applicable责任；这是显式规范设计的定义后果，非实证分类器。 +- **actual-mixed-claim — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:181-214`）：switchEmpirical与unsupportedPosition同为w=true的主张；经验面实际discharged，价值面reasons=[]使义务失败，非两个无关claim标签。 +- **three-facet-and-articulation-elements — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:17-70`）：四类表达要素和三种责任接口独立存在；本项通过不认可ValueProcedure是完整价值正当性判定器。 + +### T17 — accepted + +分类：W countermodels。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Bool、Bool×Bool、Bool×Nat为实际模型类；可测测试读取一个coordinate；重复相同record不添加未测预算信息。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport`, `CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport`, `CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment`, `CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **articulated-not-established — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:216-235`）：非空concept/reasons但emptyTheory不支持w=true；另有不相关articulation与facet对齐失败。 +- **measurable-not-relevant-or-correct — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:237-243,273-293`）：第一coordinate可测且重复结果稳定，第二coordinate可true/false；单次和重复均不支持未测结论。 +- **repeat-not-value-reasons — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:248-293`）：action=true记录与budget0和3都兼容，无法支持budget consequence；非空announcement自述仍未履行价值reason→consequence检查。 +- **compatibility-not-entailment — accepted**（`Logic.lean:229-234`）：加入w=true与emptyTheory相容，但emptyTheory并不蕴涵它；有true/false反世界。 +- **self-assertion-not-reason — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:253-262,300-306`）：既有空reason反例，也有非空真自述在budget0不能推出所声称后果的内容性反例。 + +### T18 — accepted + +分类：W/N procedural satisfiability。 + +实际前提与对象范围：switchPosition取行动true，采用该承诺为起点，成本3/收益4；事实不被宣称必然推出价值采纳；反事实false world有响应。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof`, `CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **reasons-limits-consequence-openness — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:178-193`）：成本/收益理由与所选择true选项有具体关系，推出cost Exhibit the independence of the added choice obligation from the represented general assessment obligations, without placing it in those premises; qualify the model scope rather than claim neutral facts establish a value commitment. + +预定接口 `CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice` 只是待实现接口。本设计不因这个名字而要求或宣称完整规范 Grounds 已履行。 + +## 结论与精确命题 + +**可以在冻结的 represented general assessment obligations 边界内构造非空反例。** 取同一个优先主张 q、同一组非空地位理由 E、同一比较域和明确限度；正确完成对 E 是否支持 q 的评估，得到“不能推出”的判断；选择模块仍仅凭地位给出 q 所称优先性，违反额外选择条款的“地位本身不足以确立优先”限制。 + +应证明的是：存在一个内容模型 M，使以下二者同时成立： + +1. 对 M 中同一 q/E 的**有限评估程序职责**已完成，并有可核验的正确评估结果和反模型。 +2. M 中实际采用的优先理由仅是既有地位，因而不满足额外选择条款的一项必要条件。 + +**不能把它升级为**“同一未限定的优先主张 q 已充分满足完整一般 Grounds，但仍违反 Choice”。本模型中，q 的提出者若在知道理由不足后仍保持其无条件优先断言，便未满足 U14 的强度/范围与支持相称要求。完成评估不等于被评估主张获得支持；报告评估为不足不等于 q 必假。 + +这是对冻结目标已明示的模型范围作实例化，不修改目标，不增加规范，也不将难以证明的形式分支改列为边界。它不建立全部一般 Grounds 在充分规范意义上与 Choice 的独立性；该更强命题既不是此模型的结论，也不能借接口名称暗示。 + +## 同一对象的最小内容模型 + +### 1. 实现、任务和主张 + +取两个不同的实现 `A` 与 `B`。当前任务、比较范围、术语含义和假设保持固定。若实现中需要展示实际任务内容，可令两者都在布尔输入上计算恒等函数：A 直接返回输入，B 按真假分支返回相同布尔值。两者在该任务上都可行；这些可行性事实只是固定背景，不产生谁应优先的比较结论。 + +唯一被评估的选择主张 q 是： + +> 在当前任务及候选集合 {A, B} 中，A 应优先于 B。 + +q 是一个**规范性的优先主张**。以下形式解释检验“给定理由是否逻辑支持该主张”，不把 q 偷换为描述性命题“某排序程序恰好先输出 A”，也不把形式解释中的 q 真值宣称为实际价值真理。 + +### 2. 非空且有内容的理由 + +公开事实为：A 是既有实现；B 不是既有实现。理由集 E 包含这两个实际可识别的事实记录： + +- `Established(A)`； +- `not Established(B)`。 + +每个记录都关联 q 和同一任务/时间/候选范围，有清楚的概念含义和判定值。它们不为空，不是任意字符串，也不是“因为它应优先，所以应优先”的重述。它们提供了关于候选地位的真实内容；问题在于这些内容是否足以支持**优先性**，而不是这些事实有没有发生。 + +就非蕴涵证明而言，一个 A 地位事实已足以组成非空 E；此设计保留第二条，用来使 A/B 地位差异及选择行为明确。对象域采用两个候选和两种优先序；不声称已证明全局最小形式。 + +### 3. 两种具体优先序解释 + +取两个有限解释，地位事实完全相同，优先关系分别是： + +| 解释 | A 既有 | B 既有 | 严格优先序 | q | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| w₁ | 是 | 否 | A 在 B 前 | 真 | +| w₂ | 是 | 否 | B 在 A 前 | 假 | + +“世界”在这里是可计算的语义解释，不是声称存在两套已被正确论证的现实价值体系。优先关系来自两个元素的两种排列，因而是有内容、可计算的严格全序；不是另设一个可任意填写的 `supports` 或 `nonEntails` 布尔量。 + +理由满足关系 `E(w)` 逐项检查地位事实。定义所建推论片段的支持： + +`InferentialSupport(E, q) := 对每个满足 E 的解释 w，q(w) 成立。` + +计算可得 w₁、w₂ 都满足 E，而 q(w₂) 不成立，所以 `not InferentialSupport(E, q)`。证明须显式给出 w₂ 及 E 在 w₂ 中成立、q 在 w₂ 中不成立；不是将“不支持”预装为输入字段。 + +该反例不假设地位永远无实际意义。它只检验给定理由中**没有**其他连接目标、价值和约束的优先理由时，不能由地位事实本身推出 q。没有加入 `Established(x) → Priority(x)` 之类的桥接前提；加入该前提会改变待检验的论证，而且其规范根据需要另行交代。 + +### 4. 同一主张的真实评估 + +评估记录必须直接包含 q 的标识、E 的全部记录标识、固定范围、计算所得两个兼容解释、判定“不蕴涵”和反例 w₂。验证器重新计算 E/q 的语义，核验报告中的反例，而不是只检查记录字段非空。 + +可表达限度具体是： + +- E 只提供当前候选的既有地位事实； +- 评估只讨论当前任务与 {A, B}，未声称其他候选或未来情况； +- 未提供由既有地位通向优先性的规范桥接前提； +- 因而 q 目前不被 E 推出；这不证明 q 在现实中错误，也不排除另有相关理由使 A 优先。 + +价值面向可如实记录：提出者的立场是仅因 A 既有而优先选择 A；给出的理由是 E；后果是 B 虽可行仍被排到 A 后；评估承认对“为何既有地位应优先”的批评，并明确当前理由不能回答这一批评。这样不是用“立场已陈述”证明价值正当性。实际理由不是空记录；准确结论正是“有理由内容，但没有所声称的支持力量”。 + +### 5. 选择仍违反额外条件 + +同一系统的选择模块按照既有地位将 A 排在 B 前。它对 q 的优先理由只使用 E，没有把其他实现的评估报告或另一个主张的根据拿来代替 q 的根据。审查模块正确指出 E 不推出 q，而选择模块继续持有 q；二者不是逻辑矛盾，因为“不被这些理由支持”不等于“q 为假”。 + +Choice 部分无需构造一个全新“实现必须满足什么”的规范。直接使用源文已有的必要条件：**仅既有地位不足以确立优先性**。实际优先理由全部是地位事实，且提出者仍声称据此具有优先性，因此该必要条件未满足。不能把单纯选择了可行 A 与宣称 A 凭地位享有优先权混同；违规的是后者的理由与优先主张。 + +若随后系统撤回 q，或者取得与目标、价值、约束相关的实际理由，这就是另一个状态。本反例不阻止它被修正，也不把既有实现永远排除。 + +## 哪些责任已完成，哪些没有 + +| 责任/性质 | 本模型状态 | 实际依据与限度 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| 对象与主张可识别 | 已完成 | q 始终是同一任务中 A 对 B 的规范优先主张 | +| 概念、假设、理由、限度可表达 | 已完成于有限结构 | 明确候选、地位事实、E、解释域及缺失桥接前提 | +| 理由非空且真实对应 q | 已完成 | 两条 E 记录就是提出者为 q 使用的地位事实；不借另一 claim | +| 事实记录在模型中可核验 | 已完成 | 两个解释都明确满足两条地位事实 | +| 检查 E 是否支持 q | 已完成且结果正确 | 实际枚举解释、提供并验证 w₂，结论为不蕴涵 | +| 不把不蕴涵当作 q 恒假 | 已完成 | w₁ 满足 q；报告仅拒绝所检验的推论 | +| 价值立场、给出理由、限度、后果及批评可见 | 可在该程序结构中完成 | 记录立场与真实有限理由，并承认其不能回答相关批评；不证明充分正当性 | +| 全部经验根据的现实可靠性 | 未证明，不属于此有限结果 | 地位事实是该有限模型的已给事实；不声称所有现实记录可靠 | +| 未限定 q 的支持强度/范围相称 | **未满足** | q 仍被声称，但 E 不推出 q；不能标成充分 Grounds 合规 | +| 初始价值立场的充分正当性 | 未证明 | 说明理由和接受批评不自动证成该立场 | +| 额外 Choice 的地位限制 | **未满足** | 实际优先仅以既有地位为理由 | + +由此，`represented assessment duties completed` 可以为真，而 `Choice status condition satisfied` 为假。`FullGrounds(q)` 不应被标真，也不应把“记录了 Grounds 结构”作为其证明。 + +## 建议的通用数学接口及不可偷换项 + +接口应参数化候选、事实理由、优先关系解释、主张语义、论据满足关系和评估报告，而非只为 A/B 定义一个恒真的 `GeneralGrounds`。至少区分： + +1. `ArticulatedArgument`：有可解读的同一 claim、premises/reasons、条件和限度。 +2. `AssessmentCompleted` 或同义名称：执行并正确记录“是否支持”的检查；允许支持或不支持两种结果。 +3. `InferentialSupport`：由解释集合的实际语义定义，不是记录存在性。 +4. `ProportionateAssertedClaim`：若选择模块保持该强度的 q，则需要与其相称的支持；本反例对这个性质不能出具证明。 +5. `ChoiceStatusCondition`：直接表达源文的地位本身不能给予优先，不冒充完整 Choice 的充分定义。 + +预定 `generalGroundsNotChoice` 若保留该名字，实际类型和读者解释必须写清它的前项是**represented finite assessment obligations**。若前项实际叫 `Grounds`，也必须在类型和文稿中公开说明它只表达此程序片段；否则容易将程序完成性读成全规范合规。不能把此模型的 `AssessmentCompleted` 与冻结 T15 中承载更广责任的 `Evidence.Grounds` 未加区分地等同。 + +禁止的修补包括： + +- 令另一个无关 claim 成为 Grounds 见证，仍对 q 做坏选择； +- 把 reasons/limits 填几个字符串即判为依据充分； +- 假设 `Support(E,q)`，再投影“已支持”； +- 把 q 改成“StatusFirst 算法输出 A”的描述性命题，却仍宣称证明规范优先性； +- 加入“所有既有实现本来就应优先”的新规范桥接前提而不承认目标已改变； +- 把“正确发现支持不足”算成“未限定 q 已受充分支持”； +- 用空 claim、空解释域或没有实际使用理由的选择变量获得反例。 + +## 实际可运行验证及结果 + +本轮以 `rtk run` 调用 Python 对独立设计执行有限枚举；没有创建或读取 Lean。第一次探索脚本检查两个排列、理由非空和反模型；第二次完整脚本让 q 的报告回指同一 claim/理由，并实际计算报告正确性、Choice 必要条件和所建推论片段的相称性。第二次结果为： + +```text +{'candidates': 2, 'worlds': 2, 'reasons': 2, + 'same_claim_report_valid': True, + 'inference_entailed': False, + 'choice_status_exclusion_satisfied': False, + 'modeled_inferential_proportionality': False} +actual_assertions=pass; full normative Grounds compliance not claimed +``` + +第二次脚本的核心断言可以原样重跑： + +```sh +rtk run 'python3 - <<'"'"'PY'"'"' +from itertools import permutations +candidates=("A","B") +orders=tuple(permutations(candidates)) +status={"A":True,"B":False} +reasons=(("established","A",True),("established","B",False)) +worlds=tuple({"order":o,"status":status.copy()} for o in orders) +def E(w): return all(w["status"][i]==v for tag,i,v in reasons) +def q(w): return w["order"].index("A")`，记录完整命令、cwd、返回码和输出至该次 `rechecks/run-*/receipt.json`，不覆盖冻结结果；首次复核结果保留在 `final-recheck-receipt.json`。语义判断仍来自定义、实际证明和反模型；构建通过不会替代来源审查。 + +| 源文件 | SHA-256 | +| --- | --- | +| `CoreReader/Agency.lean` | `b0dca4187a88a0a0f33c3dd6a11bb383907603ef514e80e9e3f09f95ce9633e2` | +| `CoreReader/Choice.lean` | `07cf17f73802bdd34ae00ecba317ddc0283321cce00f15a84b69df421c3fe25f` | +| `CoreReader/Evidence.lean` | `18beb2b94450fdab36229b645e2df129348f3e67306104e842e0dce6e72443e8` | +| `CoreReader/Integration.lean` | `6821e55e284fcc69136a77adf9375b335e9b5f567d9124ef728e562d4b9eb4e1` | +| `CoreReader/Logic.lean` | `6b70be8964763b6447a2603bde665ff58106678f2e1d421bebd8c6b29ae46e04` | +| `CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean` | `25292faa71c5585a8f50cb07d72c2f44fa12dcfb125b2b92094f9306fecb4fd0` | +| `CoreReader.lean` | `80eee78ec3453fefdb26d3dbce97f0447d4b9ffeb4683604dad0c03902a1bfdd` | + +## 实际语义及关键限制 + +- Logic 的一致性依赖显式 admissible world、固定问题语义和情境；可满足性不能转成现实真值。空问题类型仍可使一致性空真，因此正见证使用具体非空问题与世界。报告定理投影已采纳的单向 TruthfulReport，不提供自动检测或充分报告。 +- Evidence 的 Grounds 逐项检查已声明适用的同一主张方面。它不自动发现全部实际适用方面。空适用列表或空起始理论不是一概非法；只有当它们被用来冒充实际必要内容时才构成对应错误。有限支持模型允许空观察支持逻辑有效命题，不因此宣称现实经验根据已充分。 +- 新 ValuePosition 将立场选项与结果、目标、约束、理由相连；JointAdoption 排除无可满足联合起点。ValueProcedure 是所选程序适配，不是普遍价值理论。Integration 的 positionConsequence 在给定操作模型内直接成立，证明会忽略传入的理由模型前提；这是更强的模型内后果证明，并非隐藏结论前提，也不意味着理由是这些后果的必要原因。实际理由、在适用限度内成立的批评、反选项失败和外部价值边界需同时阅读。 +- Reflexive 不再只是 subject/activity 配对存在性。它要求真实问题、目标、适用范围、理由、方法对应与结果；有限算法的 insufficient 结果可算一次正确履行评估职责，绝不是原则已经正确。生成的候选方法只是 MethodDraft，不声称已成为正确方法或在现实中执行。 +- 外援、稳定、公告与自产修订已绑定同一模型主体及相关对象。外部评估者编号是区分角色的数学数据，证书携带同一 process 的实际证明；没有建立现实身份认证、外部消息来源或人的理解。 +- JustifiedChoice 现在同时要求 Feasible 和相关理由。廉价但输出错误的 successor 说明“内部理由相关”不是“所有目标约束充分”。两个候选构成封闭比较类，不是所有可行实现的枚举。 +- Integration 的一般 GroundsProvision、当前哲学方法与变化应用合同都有真正对象关联。applicationRetainsDuties 是明确条件接口的投影；独立补充 applicationVariation 才给出同系统改变真实目标后的失败实例。没有把规范条件写成现实已履行。 + +## T23 的最后质疑与解除边界 + +首案只有 `statusFacts` 不蕴涵 `priorityClaim`，再合取 status-only 选择失败；这不足以提供独立可变的选择政策。修订后 `ChoicePolicy` 的 `priorityReasons` 与审查对象相互独立，两个政策保留同一 selected、同一非空事实理由、同一实际 priority 问题及正确的否定审查，而采用不同实际优先理由。`PolicyIndependenceExample` 证明一项符合额外选择规范、另一项不符合。该独立政策缺口已真实修复。 + +仍须区分两个前项：A 是完成所表示的理由评估程序，允许正确发现给定理由不蕴涵主张；G 是除额外 Choice 外全部实际适用 Grounds 责任充分履行，包括所有方面以及强度/范围与支持相称。`GeneralAssessmentFulfilled` 只包含表述、同一审查和准确性，因此模型证明 A∧¬C，并提供 A∧C 对照；没有证明 G∧¬C。从前者不能推出后者。 + +最终接受 A 范围有直接来源根据：原文 2.4 指定 “general requirement to assess reasons”，2.1 将评估解释为检查是否支持，而不是确保被评主张获得支持；冻结英文明确写 “represented general assessment obligations” 和 “qualify the model scope”。这不是仅凭函数名解释目标。原 source-first 中文末句“不包含该额外承诺的一般要求”确有被读为 G 的较强歧义，不能说原稿从未有歧义，也不能凭设计早于代码便断言完全等强。如果把该中文强读法作为额外合同，G 分支仍未完成；本次 accepted 不覆盖该强读法。后续来源澄清保留了这个历史差异，未改原稿或冻结哈希。 + +此外，`¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim` 只否定所表示的推论支持，不证明该价值优先主张恒假、缺乏所有可能价值理由或必然违反全部一般相称要求。反解释也没有加入全部实际应用可行性条件；不能把 successor 反世界说成在 identityRequirements 下同样可行。两个政策保持实际实现函数和已证明可辨识表现不变；这些事实本身不赋予额外价值优先规范。 + +如果读者稿写成“完整一般 Grounds 合规仍可仅凭地位正当地获得优先”或用 generalGroundsNotChoice 的名称省略上述 A/G 区别，该表述应 rejected，即使这次有限类型证明通过。 + +## 逐目标结果与首案变化 + +下表是阅读索引；`final-target-verdicts.json` 保留每个原 branch、原判定、原缺口与最小修正条件，并给当前陈述、真实声明行号、证明范围和修订依据。行号属于最终 7 文件，不复用历史空白副本的行号。 + +| 目标 | 首案 → 最终 | 最终依据与范围 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| T01 | accepted → accepted | 权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 | +| T02 | rejected → accepted | 同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 | +| T03 | accepted → accepted | Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 | +| T04 | accepted → accepted | neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。 | +| T05 | accepted → accepted | 所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 | +| T06 | rejected → accepted | 11分支均有同对象内容：三类数量膨胀不扩能，同一生成系统执行分别依赖经验/知识/协作，无外援失败，稳定动作保持所需能力并满足预算，自述对同一次变化的内容被反驳。 | +| T07 | rejected → accepted | 保留任意支持关系的条件推论，并新增同一次扩展的基线、测试条件、记录、非空兼容世界和Grounds；同一报告在膨胀反世界也成立，故报告不支持成就。 | +| T08 | accepted → accepted | 显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 | +| T09 | accepted → accepted | 撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 | +| T10 | accepted → accepted | 语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 | +| T11 | accepted → accepted | 具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。 | +| T12 | accepted → accepted | 模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。 | +| T13 | rejected → accepted | Reflexive现在要求一致的原则登记、同所有者对象、实际问题/理由/范围/结果及方法契约；形成、应用、修订内容已由有限评估与生成函数实际计算。 | +| T14 | rejected → accepted | 无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 | +| T15 | rejected → accepted | Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 | +| T16 | accepted → accepted | 义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 | +| T17 | accepted → accepted | 表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 | +| T18 | accepted → accepted | 有限价值立场有可满足但无需自证的起点、选项相关理由、限度、后果和批评响应；两理由联合充分而各自不足，异类方面无需统一尺度。 | +| T19 | accepted → accepted | 真实观测域{0}内一致而在1不同的函数构成局部支持与普遍非支持；省略差异不能消除差异。 | +| T20 | accepted → accepted | 单次观察有限支持、无必需统一链的推论、不同结果保持指定界，以及核验/条件复现/结论稳定的分离均成立。 | +| T21 | rejected → accepted | 同一process的输出与附加解释要求分开，两种应用都有对应Grounds；外部证书携带不同评估者/被评者标识及该process实际输出证明；四类库存复制不扩展所表示能力。 | +| T22 | accepted → accepted | 在额外采纳的选择规范下三类纯身份理由均失败；既有惯用实现仍凭实际输出理由和可行性获接受。 | +| T23 | rejected → accepted | 新政策对象在相同且准确的否定审查后独立采用不同优先理由，完成所表示的一般理由审查而额外选择规范一成一败；通过严格限于冻结清单所称represented assessment obligations。 | +| T24 | accepted → accepted | 单一可行实现、不等价、局部相同全局不同及四种内部理由均有实例；新增廉价错误输出反例说明相关理由不是自动充分。 | +| T25 | rejected → accepted | Grounds承诺已扩展对应一般GroundsProvision而非一条能力义务；实际哲学方法绑定同系统原则形式和政策，并对两个提案计算选择，旧对象错配已消除。 | +| T26 | rejected → accepted | 取向不保证反身履行、Charter不提供某个能力证据包的支持，以及共享全接口正见证均成立；仅证明这些指定方向。 | +| T27 | rejected → accepted | 任意应用要求和合同的条件义务接口已参数化；补充applicationVariation对同一系统改变真实期望输出并证明旧证据失败；五项承诺由各自选项后果、理由和限度区分。 | +| T28 | accepted → accepted | 结构化推论评估给出真实n=2到n+1=3的根据且不要求经验测试；经验方面仍保留观察责任。 | + +## 来源条目判定 + +`final-source-entries.json` 提供全部 33 段的 fidelity、英文 reason 和对应 reason_zh。accepted 目标不自动把来源升级为 full；有限类型、规范接口及有限反模型与原文现实/规范范围的差异逐段保存。 + +`organon.preamble#p1` 是权威、采纳性质及非普遍正确性边界，判 not_applicable。它虽被 T02/jointWitness 作背景范围引用，jointWitness 只遵守该阅读边界并展示所采纳接口的相容实例，不证明元层权威声明。背景引用不能强迫这段成为数学证明源；schema 如把这种引用等同 formal proof coverage，应修复角色适配而不是硬升 fidelity。`organon.charter.overview#p1` 是三标题结构列表，亦不适用。其余 31 段有实际有限对应且保留未形式化部分，故 partial；没有全段 full。 + +## 逐行稿与交付边界 + +本人生成的 informed 英中逐行片段覆盖 `CoreReader.lean`、Agency、Reflexivity、Integration 的全部 1141 个非空行，包括来源映射注释，键是精确相对路径与 1-based 行号。根文件 1 行、Agency 251 行、Reflexivity 367 行、Integration 522 行。空白行无说明。英文说明解释实际语义和证明步骤，中文按同一结构翻译；canonical articulation 表示按已有内容构造表述，不是新添哲学规范。 + +Logic/Evidence/Choice 的最终逐行稿由另一个获委派的 informed 稿件作者提供；本人独立读取并审查其模型语义，但不冒称本次片段已包含那三文件。Root 合并及读者任务验证属于后续整套读者交付检查。本报告不提前断言合并稿已经通过。 + +没有编辑模型或哲学原文，没有删除或覆盖初始判断。此次比较不对未提供的更晚候选、未来修改或现实部署生效。 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-review-identity.json b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-review-identity.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aa0b3bd --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-review-identity.json @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +{ + "review_kind": "informed revision comparison, not blind", + "snapshot": "Core/private historical check objects/2026-09-14T03-53-09.030Z-12298-3c6aab", + "target_statuses": { + "accepted": 28, + "rejected": 0, + "pending": 0 + }, + "target_scope": "T23 accepted for represented finite assessment duties A only; stronger full non-Choice Grounds G independence is not established", + "source_statuses": { + "partial": 31, + "full": 0, + "not_applicable": 2, + "rejected": 0, + "pending": 0 + }, + "line_fragments": { + "files": [ + "CoreReader.lean", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean", + "CoreReader/Integration.lean" + ], + "nonempty_lines": 1141, + "coverage": "Agency/Reflexivity/Integration/root only; remaining three modules authored separately" + }, + "historical_preserved_sha256": { + "BLIND-INITIAL.md": "2575d7f5963e22b2729ac837d30d54e302f63085588030bb25f5ea1961173484", + "code-explanations-en.json": "e00bf3e4a16265caea1d065d4103c7dff08235949054efe084308446863a754e", + "SOURCE-COMPARISON-INITIAL.md": "7f43edcb8eeefb62f102fde11c239c5f7e286e26c5413dbb59d07bc965d4c273", + "target-verdicts-initial.json": "e29e5e008c4b84268c8be97c82687c00edb6d83993e4cef05a330c1e4e43ecb9" + }, + "inputs_sha256": { + "Core/PHILOSOPHY.md": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "Core/private maintenance records/source-first.md": "9d6db04489a10a5aab217601ad69f006d4fd1ee1183aec9a7314764b4c3d8afd", + "Core/private maintenance records/targets-frozen.json": "35cda8ba439af8b32fd180efae2829b370bc5b82960cc91feb24e3e03636d2f4", + "Core/private maintenance records/source-paragraphs.json": "011581c7b79823bf0a68275cd7b695ba074a1a027fbe7063d29f7b3f6bf8dab8", + "Core/private maintenance records/source-first-T23-design.md": "58486132f6c712c9db3c2a2dc0f159f2a02fd98de5c825d899effbe8d5cd35c4", + "Core/private maintenance records/T23-scope-reconciliation.md": "e5faa35d911bddd1100fb16a9b2d651adf4c6fd34ddc8262ae7a38b5428c59c8" + }, + "artifacts_sha256": { + "final-target-verdicts.json": "bc7832edfe322293783a91b0583edbeff1435e4ff8c62d182a6a7ad7a32c0a77", + "final-source-entries.json": "5e5dd7f82844deb10f246bb83f427a77720a0a39e95a4d64a394b9b7219411df", + "final-source-comparison.md": "8676b4e3f63cb3868bdec79e49ed4bd0ead2006ae6fde659dde64159a5bacaa2", + "code-explanations-final-en-part.json": "d8743576726a90b5fc4bd40ca2df65265764e1e615f32eb56054ec9a7b8c4311", + "code-explanations-final-zh-part.json": "35050657e105df084b4836f9073f56daf5ab634a0fb4f3217d488f3ef2d72fd0", + "final-execution-checks-v3.json": "cc25d759d0c2a081bda9f96fe669ce1d09f18d7ad189c861656ebf2cae1e1d22", + "final-recheck-receipt.json": "531dd734fcbcd5c2c2d694225bf9ad825290c255bfbaf49e30367b221b741c04", + "recheck-final.py": "969ec8fc4f0998044e0576395c27146903f02492c590d26c2f5a556b9d084457", + "FinalReviewCheck.lean": "e7037edf17953820b4b05c4a52c9b71ec18bf71d611bf6fb0d9e0eaab86be1d4" + } +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-source-entries-final.json b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-source-entries-final.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..18d2870 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-source-entries-final.json @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +[ + { + "id": "organon.preamble#p1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This declares textual authority and adopted-commitment scope, not a mathematical proposition about all systems. The review retains this boundary without manufacturing a Lean theorem of authority.", + "reason_zh": "本段声明文本权威与采纳承诺的范围，并非关于所有系统的数学命题。审查保留该边界，不制造证明文本权威的Lean定理。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02" + ], + "mapping_role": "authority-and-adoption-boundary; linked declarations illustrate compliance with this reading, not a proof of the boundary" + }, + { + "id": "organon.preamble#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The shared model exhibits compatible constraints without a chapter-priority inference. Authority of meanings and limits, the role of Rationale and revisability of actual skills remain textual commitments outside this finite witness.", + "reason_zh": "共享模型展示约束可以共同成立，未从章节位置推出优先性。含义与限度的权威、Rationale的角色及实际技能可修订性仍是有限见证之外的文本承诺。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview#p1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a structural list of three headings. It organizes substantive provisions and requires no fabricated theorem.", + "reason_zh": "本段是列出三项标题的结构性文本，用于组织实质条款，无需虚构定理。", + "targets": [ + "T01" + ], + "mapping_role": "structural-heading" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "jointWitness combines valued expansion, revisability, contextual consistency and contentful owned principle work in one inhabited system. It proves model satisfiability, not actual compliance by arbitrary systems.", + "reason_zh": "jointWitness在同一非空系统中组合扩展价值、可修订性、情境一致性和具有内容的自有原则工作；它证明模型可满足，不证明任意现实系统履行这些要求。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02", + "T03" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The three requirements remain distinct predicates with a shared example and specific nonentailments. Their interpretation as philosophical obligations and their full conditions in arbitrary applications are not derived from the example.", + "reason_zh": "三项要求保留为不同谓词，并有共享实例和特定非蕴涵结果。其作为哲学义务的解释及任意应用中的完整条件，不能由实例推出。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02", + "T03" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Generative specifies valuation and revisability of current forms. The finite tags and state examples do not characterize every form of understanding, construction or intrinsic orientation.", + "reason_zh": "Generative规定对扩展的赋值及当前形式的可修订性。有限标签和状态实例没有刻画理解、构造或内在取向的全部形式。", + "targets": [ + "T03" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The neutral-policy counterexample separates permission for distinct versions from the adopted valuation predicate. It does not establish what every real system values or justify the adopted value universally.", + "reason_zh": "中性政策反例把不同版本的变更许可与采纳的价值谓词分开；它不确立每个现实系统重视什么，也不普遍证成所采纳的价值。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T04" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "All five represented form kinds, including organization, method and principle, fall under conditional revisability; a constant trace shows no progress guarantee. The chosen representation is not an exhaustive ontology or an executed revision.", + "reason_zh": "五类已表示的形式包括组织、方法和原则，均受条件性可修订要求约束；常值轨迹说明不保证进步。该表示不是穷尽性本体分类，也不是已经执行的修订。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T05" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The same before/after states increase inventory, abstraction and vocabulary without adding represented capabilities. Actual performance records can distinguish a genuine extension in a two-case world; empirical reliability beyond that world is not proved.", + "reason_zh": "同一前后状态增加库存、抽象层级和词汇，却未增加已表示的能力。实际表现记录能在两类世界中区分真正扩展，但没有证明该世界之外的经验可靠性。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T06", + "T07" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Bound execution exhibits separate external dependencies, grounded stability, a nonimproving trace and a refuted owned announcement. These are finite compatibility and failure examples; philosophical adoption and real autonomous development remain outside their conclusions.", + "reason_zh": "绑定的执行接口分别展示外部依赖、有根据的稳定、无改善轨迹及被反驳的自有报告。这些是有限相容性与失败实例，哲学采纳和现实自主发展不在其结论范围内。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T06", + "T07" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The general semantic theorem prevents opposite consequences under one theory/context when an admissible world exists. Existence of such a world, choice of questions and interpretation of held judgments are explicit modeling conditions, not guaranteed for reality.", + "reason_zh": "一般语义定理在存在可容许世界时，排除同一理论和情境中的正反后果。该世界存在、问题选择及所持判断的解释都是明确建模条件，不是现实保证。", + "targets": [ + "T08" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Concrete retraction slices can reverse judgments, and a conditional reporting specification disallows concealing recognized change. No automatic detector, adequate report generator or real revision history is established.", + "reason_zh": "具体撤回切片允许判断反转，条件性报告规范排除隐瞒已识别变化；没有确立自动检测器、充分报告生成器或现实修订历史。", + "targets": [ + "T09", + "T10" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Separate assumption, meaning and scope changes admit different judgments; hidden changes fail the adopted report condition. This covers explicit semantic models, not every practical ambiguity or method of concealment.", + "reason_zh": "假设、含义和范围的分别变化允许不同判断；隐藏变化违反采纳的报告条件。结果覆盖明确语义模型，不覆盖全部实际歧义或隐瞒方式。", + "targets": [ + "T09", + "T10" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Finite witnesses distinguish tension from contradiction and consistency from truth or completeness. Refusing to retain a demonstrated conflict is a conditional consequence of an adopted consistency requirement, not an implemented revision strategy.", + "reason_zh": "有限见证区分张力与矛盾、一致性与真或完整性。不保留已示冲突是采纳一致性要求后的条件后果，不是已经实现的修订策略。", + "targets": [ + "T11", + "T12" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Reflexive quantifies applicable owned rules and subjects, with coherent keys and meaningful application records. The concrete rule set has generation and assessment work but does not cover every possible real principle.", + "reason_zh": "Reflexive量化适用的自有规则和对象，并要求一致的标识与有意义的适用记录。具体规则集包含生成和评估工作，但不覆盖所有可能的现实原则。", + "targets": [ + "T13" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The revised module models formation purposes, requested applicability scopes and revision counterexamples with actual evaluation and generation outcomes. These finite inquiry contracts do not establish the correctness or completeness of every assessment methodology.", + "reason_zh": "修订模块通过实际评估和生成结果表示形成目的、待考察适用范围和修订反例。这些有限问题契约不确立所有评估方法的正确性或完整性。", + "targets": [ + "T13" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Applicability is retained, self-exemption fails where conditions hold, and finite self-tests plus a produced revision fail to establish universal support. The owned records and source identities are mathematical objects, not authenticated execution histories.", + "reason_zh": "适用性得到保留，条件成立时不能自我豁免；有限自测和自产修订不能确立普遍支持。自有记录和来源标识是数学对象，不是经过认证的执行历史。", + "targets": [ + "T13", + "T14" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Grounds checks identified applicable facets of the same claim; support, entailment and an option-indexed value procedure carry distinct responsibilities. This is a chosen formal interface and finite fulfillment examples, not a universal sufficient criterion for all philosophical grounds.", + "reason_zh": "Grounds检查同一主张的已识别适用方面；支持、蕴涵及选项相关价值程序承担不同责任。它是选定的形式接口与有限履责实例，不是所有哲学根据的普遍充分标准。", + "targets": [ + "T07", + "T15" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Articulation content is linked to each facet and separated from its discharge; union and missing-aspect examples prevent labels from waiving represented duties. Identifying every actually relevant aspect remains an application responsibility not solved by the datatype.", + "reason_zh": "表述内容与每个方面相连，并与该方面的履责分开；并集和缺失方面实例防止标签豁免已表示义务。识别所有实际相关方面仍是应用责任，不能由数据类型解决。", + "targets": [ + "T15", + "T16", + "T17", + "T18", + "T28" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The three modeled adapters check observational compatibility/support, semantic entailment, and value reasons with limits/consequences/criticism. Actual relevance, empirical uncertainty and the adequacy of value criticism beyond the chosen cases are not exhaustively formalized.", + "reason_zh": "三个已建模适配接口分别检查观察相容性与支持、语义蕴涵，以及带限度、后果和批评的价值理由。所选案例之外的实际相关性、经验不确定性和价值批评充分性没有被穷尽形式化。", + "targets": [ + "T15", + "T16", + "T17", + "T18", + "T28" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "JointAdoption requires consistent instantiated starting commitments without proving all starting assumptions. A two-reason example and heterogeneous facets avoid a universal numerical scale. They demonstrate procedural consistency, not ultimate value justification.", + "reason_zh": "JointAdoption要求起始承诺有一致的实例，而不证明所有起始假设。双理由实例和异类方面避免使用统一数值尺度；它们展示程序一致性，不提供终极价值证成。", + "targets": [ + "T15", + "T16", + "T17", + "T18", + "T28" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A proper local observation scope supports a local function claim while admitting a counterexample outside it. This establishes the specified nonentailment; it neither identifies all relevant real differences nor rules out justified wider evidence.", + "reason_zh": "真子域内的局部观察支持局部函数主张，同时容许域外反例。结果确立指定的非蕴涵，不识别所有现实相关差异，也不排除有根据的更广证据。", + "targets": [ + "T19", + "T20" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Repeated irrelevant measurements fail support, while a valid inferential assessment needs no empirical chain. This refutes a universal mandatory chain within the represented responsibilities but does not characterize every framework or measurement practice.", + "reason_zh": "重复无关测量不能提供支持，而有效推论评估无需经验链条。这在已表示责任中反驳统一必需链条，但不刻画所有框架或测量实践。", + "targets": [ + "T19", + "T20" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A single observation has limited support and distinct trial outcomes preserve a fixed bound. Verification, reproducible conditions and conclusion stability use separate predicates; no probability distribution or general reproducibility law is proved.", + "reason_zh": "单次观察具有有限支持，不同试验结果保持固定界。核验、可复现条件和结论稳定使用不同谓词；没有证明概率分布或一般复现规律。", + "targets": [ + "T19", + "T20" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Output-only and explanation-bearing contracts concern the same process and each has its own checked Grounds; applicationVariation changes the actual objective and invalidates old evidence. No uniform real mastery or capability-level definition is derived.", + "reason_zh": "仅输出合同和附加解释合同针对同一过程，各有经过检查的Grounds；applicationVariation改变实际目标并使旧证据失效。没有推导现实中统一的方法掌握或能力等级定义。", + "targets": [ + "T07", + "T21" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A distinct assessor role supplies a proof about the exact output process while no explanation certificate is attached; duplicating four inventory kinds leaves represented capability unchanged. Role numbers and certificates do not prove external provenance or human-like understanding.", + "reason_zh": "不同评估者角色为确切输出过程提供证明，而该过程没有附带解释证书；复制四类库存不改变已表示能力。角色编号和证书不证明外部来源或类似人的理解。", + "targets": [ + "T07", + "T21" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The adopted choice interface requires feasibility and an objective/value/constraint-linked reason and rejects status-only reasons. Its finite reason vocabulary and concrete feasibility checks do not supply a general theory of warranted real implementation choice.", + "reason_zh": "采纳的选择接口要求可行性及与目标、价值、约束相连的理由，并拒绝纯地位理由。有限理由词汇和具体可行性检查不构成现实实现选择的一般证成理论。", + "targets": [ + "T22", + "T23" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Two independent policies share a correct negative audit but differ on the added choice norm, establishing independence from the represented assessment procedure. This does not show an unsupported priority claim fully satisfies general Grounds, or derive a value commitment from neutral facts.", + "reason_zh": "两个独立政策共享正确的否定审查，却对额外选择规范一成一败，确立相对于已表示评估程序的独立性。这不表明无支持的优先主张完全满足一般Grounds，也不从中性事实推出价值承诺。", + "targets": [ + "T22", + "T23" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Concrete cases have one feasible candidate, unequal implementations, local agreement with wider difference and four eligible internal reasons. A cheap wrong-output method shows eligibility alone is insufficient. These results concern selected candidates and contracts, not all methods.", + "reason_zh": "具体案例展示唯一可行候选、不等价实现、局部相同而更广范围不同，以及四种合格内部理由。廉价但输出错误的方法说明理由合格并不足够。结果针对所选候选和合同，不覆盖所有方法。", + "targets": [ + "T24" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "One shared model combines the charter and Grounds and assigns five commitments distinct operational reasons, limits and live criticism. Specified nonentailments prevent chapter order from doing logical work; neither the universal adoption nor ultimate justification of all commitments follows.", + "reason_zh": "一个共享模型组合章程与Grounds，并为五项承诺赋予不同的操作性理由、限度和实际批评。指定非蕴涵防止章节顺序承担推理作用；所有承诺的普遍采纳或终极证成并不随之成立。", + "targets": [ + "T02", + "T12", + "T23", + "T25", + "T26", + "T27" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Consistency/support and orientation/capability remain separate; changing an application objective changes its actual claim and can defeat retained evidence. Universal application compliance is only an assumed conditional interface, not an achieved fact.", + "reason_zh": "一致性与支持、取向与能力保持分离；改变应用目标会改变实际主张，并可能使保留证据失败。普遍应用履责仅由有前提的条件接口表达，不是已经实现的事实。", + "targets": [ + "T02", + "T12", + "T23", + "T25", + "T26", + "T27" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Contentful self-application, exact own-capability assessment, the general Grounds provision and the same current philosophy method are linked in the model. Their checked coexistence supplies no self-proof, real execution guarantee or unconditional applicability.", + "reason_zh": "模型连接具有内容的自我适用、确切自有能力评估、一般Grounds条款与同一个当前哲学方法。经过检查的共同成立不提供自证、现实执行保证或无条件适用性。", + "targets": [ + "T02", + "T12", + "T23", + "T25", + "T26", + "T27" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.terms#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "FormKind includes organization, methods and principles, and an inferential assessment has no executable-test requirement. These representations illustrate the terms without exhaustively defining every existing form or every non-test assessment.", + "reason_zh": "FormKind包含组织、方法和原则，推论评估没有可执行测试要求。这些表示说明术语，但未穷尽定义所有既有形式或所有非测试评估。", + "targets": [ + "T05", + "T28" + ] + } +] diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-targets-final.json b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-targets-final.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d9a6351 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-targets-final.json @@ -0,0 +1,2731 @@ +[ + { + "id": "T01", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。", + "reason_en": "No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "reason_zh": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。", + "classification": "N/E-V boundary", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "来源、规范/事实及章节角色边界得到保留；本项通过仅表示边界和来源记录合格，不代表其余27项目全部实现。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [], + "proof_and_scope": "No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "authority", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "原文SHA与冻结目标一致。数学类型不包含“所有现实系统都遵守”或哲学普遍正确性结论。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "current_code": [], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "meanings-and-limits-record", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "22单元含义、条件、表格和bullet均作为来源保留；具体语义实现缺口在相应T项判定，不能由本项通过抹去。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "current_code": [], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "roles-and-headings", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Charter/Relationships标题未被制造为True定理；来源明确Rationale/Skills不增加核心义务，组合代码未赋章节顺序以演绎权威。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "current_code": [], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T02", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。", + "reason_en": "jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "reason_zh": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。", + "classification": "W satisfiability plus N interpretation", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "jointWitness确有非空数学见证，但其反身工作与各承诺理由未达到冻结的共享、内容对应模型；较弱接口的可满足性不能算所选Core规范已联合满足。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595", + "meaning": "Constructs one shared system/world satisfying actual judgments, full reflexivity, capability evidence, feasible choice and each interpreted commitment's Grounds; it is a bounded model, not universal philosophical correctness." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "inhabited-world-and-judgments", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "actual提供真实模型；held有能力和预算命题，观察在两个候选内识别identity，非空且非全真记录占位。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "shared-capability-and-choice", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "相同implementation用于capability、budget、observation和output choice；这一部分确有模块交互，观察推广限于封闭候选类。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "principle-process-content", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "五个对象/两种活动确非空，但Performed仅pair会员关系，原则形成理由、适用域考察和修订理由没有可表达内容；预填记录不足以完成冻结的内容性对象分支。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "补充与这些subject相连的实际评估问题/理由/范围/结果对象，并用非空记录验证相应义务；不要求现实系统已经运行。", + "current_analysis": "Reflexivity.lean:128、151、287、318、366要求并构造含问题、理由、限度和实际计算结果的ValidApplication；Integration.lean:124、129将同owner/rules/work接入Charter。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "individual-commitment-reasons", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "generation理由是两函数在0输出不同，仅推出存在不同输入；Grounds承诺字段可任意重贴而ValueProcedure不变。因此联合对象尚未提供每项承诺自身理由。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "建立每项承诺与其理由、限度及批评响应的可审查联系，保留价值承诺不必被证明为事实的边界。", + "current_analysis": "Integration.lean:282、356、364、377、389、423将各承诺的选项、后果、约束、理由及实际批评相连；反选项程序失败。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "no-priority-from-conjunction", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "合取本身未推出章节优先级或普遍哲学正确性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T03", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。", + "reason_en": "Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "reason_zh": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。", + "classification": "N specification", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "Generative作为明确采纳的有限规范接口保留价值取向与当前形式可修订性，未内置必然变化或进步。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33", + "meaning": "A policy satisfies this predicate when it values the designated expansion aim and declares every current form revisable. This states no actual progress condition." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "orientation", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "worthPursuing选择理解/构造扩展这一被采纳目标；与permitsVersion字段独立。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "nonfinal-current-forms", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "∀current form→revisable覆盖组织/方法/原则及外观/产物；没有预装严格改善序列。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "no-actual-success-guarantee", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "定义不含实际transition或Expanded证明；无进步trace提供边界。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T04", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。", + "reason_en": "The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "reason_zh": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。", + "classification": "W nonentailment", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "明确非空政策允许不同版本对，但完全不赋扩展价值，足以区分许可与价值取向。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:49", + "meaning": "Shows permission for version 0 to 1 and distinct versions coexist with failure of the generation predicate." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "permissible-nontrivial-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "允许0→1且0≠1；证明许可，不声称此变化已执行。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。 The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:49" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "valuation-independent", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Generative因所需价值取向为False而失败；不是将两个概念写成同一布尔量。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。 The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:49" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T05", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。", + "reason_en": "revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "reason_zh": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。", + "classification": "N/D projection and W witness", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "通用kind/version覆盖和具体可修订却无扩展见证均成立；投影性质须如实标记。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "meaning": "Extracts revisability of a specified current kind/version from an assumed generation predicate; it does not revise that form." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123", + "meaning": "Exhibits a policy meeting the generation interface and universal revisability while its independently chosen constant trace never expands." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "form-coverage", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "任意五种form kind均受∀current→revisable规范约束，包含全部必要种类。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "projection-boundary", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "只是将已采纳规范实例化，不是发明可修订性或执行修订；这正是冻结规范后果范围。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "revisable-without-progress", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "openPolicy可修订与常值baseState trace并存，每步Expanded均假。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T06", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "11分支均有同对象内容：三类数量膨胀不扩能，同一生成系统执行分别依赖经验/知识/协作，无外援失败，稳定动作保持所需能力并满足预算，自述对同一次变化的内容被反驳。", + "reason_en": "GeneratingSystem binds policy, current state, execution, required operations and budget. The resource deletion calls all use its execute interface. Stable action retains current content within the stated budget. Announcement carries owner, before/after, operation, input and expected output; its claimed membership/output expansion fails for inflatedState. All are explicit finite examples, not empirical laws.", + "reason_zh": "11分支均有同对象内容：三类数量膨胀不扩能，同一生成系统执行分别依赖经验/知识/协作，无外援失败，稳定动作保持所需能力并满足预算，自述对同一次变化的内容被反驳。", + "classification": "W eleven branches", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "数量与非进步分支有内容性见证；外部执行/稳定与同一系统状态的联系尚未建模，自称生成分支更只有构造器自等式，11分支未齐。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222", + "meaning": "Checks all concrete branches on the bound system: unchanged capability despite list inflation, resource dependence, justified stable action and an untrue same-object achievement report." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "GeneratingSystem binds policy, current state, execution, required operations and budget. The resource deletion calls all use its execute interface. Stable action retains current content within the stated budget. Announcement carries owner, before/after, operation, input and expected output; its claimed membership/output expansion fails for inflatedState. All are explicit finite examples, not empirical laws.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "a-orientation-without-progress", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "有价值/非终局政策且base与inflated之间无理解/构造成员增加。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "generatingSystem.policy为openPolicy；baseState到inflatedState不增加understood/constructed成员，Generative仍成立。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "b-more-artifacts", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同一before/after状态inventory复制，understood/constructed不变。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "inventory复制增长，而同一对状态的constructed/understood保持原内容。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "c-more-abstraction-layers", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "层级列表增加而同一状态的能力成员不增加。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一inflatedState增加层级列表但不增加能力成员。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "d-more-terms", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "词汇列表增加而理解/构造成员不变。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一inflatedState增加词汇列表但不增加能力成员。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "e-external-experience", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "Option计算确实读取experience，缺失即none；但没有标明该计算是这项Generative系统的执行，结果也不进入其状态。合取任意外部函数仅证明相容，未满足冻结同一内容系统要求。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "将政策、被执行算法、资源和before/after或执行结果纳入同一对象，再展示experience缺失的实际失败。", + "current_analysis": "GeneratingSystem.execute实际绑定assistedExecution；删去同一次调用的experience槽得到none。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "f-external-knowledge", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "knowledge依赖计算正确；同e，缺少同一系统执行绑定。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "复用同一绑定执行对象，分别删knowledge验证失败。", + "current_analysis": "同一生成系统的同一execute接口删去knowledge槽得到none。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "g-collaboration", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "collaborator缺失的Option失败正确；其同一主体/执行含义未建模。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "在上述共享执行对象中保留协作槽及单独缺失反例。", + "current_analysis": "同一生成系统execute删去collaborator槽得到none；不是独立无关函数的合取。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "h-no-autonomous-execution", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "⟨none,none,none⟩导致独立求和函数失败；没有该系统自主执行接口，不能把任意失败函数当其不能自主执行。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "明确这就是被评系统的执行接口，并把无外援调用关联其执行结果。", + "current_analysis": "该系统的execute在三个外援槽均none时失败；证明所示接口的依赖，不证明所有自主执行不可能。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "i-no-self-improvement", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "常值trace每步无Expanded；可作为所选无自我改善轨迹，不是所有系统永远不改善。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "stableTrace在每一步保持baseState，Expanded逐步失败。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "j-grounded-stability", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "StableReason给出构造内容相等和inventory越过阈值1，但没有稳定动作或被追求的预算/价值条件；阈值本身尚未关联该系统稳定选择的理由。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "把1作为明示应用约束，并证明保留当前状态的动作满足它且不丢所需能力，同时政策仍Generative。", + "current_analysis": "GeneratingSystem.stableAction保持current；requirementsMet保留所需copy操作，budgetJustified满足明确budget=1，且policy仍Generative。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "k-self-announcement-not-achievement", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "expanded=expanded只是枚举构造器自等式，不是某系统对同一变化的announcement，也没有achievement-support的失败命题。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "定义带主体、before/after和claim的实际报告，构造报告生成而同一claim不成立/缺充分支持的反例。", + "current_analysis": "inflatedAnnouncement含相同owner/before/after/op/input/output；claimedOperation=successor未成为新增能力，其实质claim被inflatedAnnouncementRefuted反驳。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T07", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "保留任意支持关系的条件推论，并新增同一次扩展的基线、测试条件、记录、非空兼容世界和Grounds；同一报告在膨胀反世界也成立，故报告不支持成就。", + "reason_en": "ConcreteAchievementExample fixes transitionBefore/After and input. A performance record distinguishes extension from inflation in the two-case world. transitionReportDoesNotSupport supplies the compatible inflation countermodel. achievementNeedsSupport uses its generic premises and separately conjoins this checked instance; it does not discharge arbitrary real achievement claims.", + "reason_zh": "保留任意支持关系的条件推论，并新增同一次扩展的基线、测试条件、记录、非空兼容世界和Grounds；同一报告在膨胀反世界也成立，故报告不支持成就。", + "classification": "D conditional fragment with N accountability", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "任意claim的support应用定理正确，但冻结要求的同一能力变化、基线和条件实例及取向/自述不提供其支持的反例没有完成。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "meaning": "Defines achievement accountability as exactly the same Grounds predicate, with no additional execution or achievement proof." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217", + "meaning": "Applies supplied compatible-world support to the arbitrary actual claim and separately includes the checked concrete transition example." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "ConcreteAchievementExample fixes transitionBefore/After and input. A performance record distinguishes extension from inflation in the two-case world. transitionReportDoesNotSupport supplies the compatible inflation countermodel. achievementNeedsSupport uses its generic premises and separately conjoins this checked instance; it does not discharge arbitrary real achievement claims.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "conditional-inference", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "对任意W及claim，支持加actual兼容性推出actual处claim；没有伪称实际可靠性已证明。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "achievementNeedsSupport:217仍按Compatible与Supports前提实例化actual，另合取已检查的具体实例；泛型结论没有隐藏自动支持。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "same-change-baseline-scope", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "未把achievement实例化为同一before/after的Expanded；没有对应基线、记录内容、条件或非空支持见证。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "给变化世界/记录及明确Expanded类claim，证明非空兼容性、支持和actual结论；保留通用定理。", + "current_analysis": "ConcreteAchievementExample:193要求同一transitionBefore/After、input=0、实际Expanded、性能记录兼容与支持和Grounds；concreteAchievementExample:204构造extension。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "orientation-and-report-insufficiency", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "generationLimits只给无Expanded和标签自等式，未建立对上述achievement的support失败。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "复用同一变化世界，构造有取向/报告但兼容反世界使支持失败。", + "current_analysis": "transitionReportDoesNotSupport:186复用同一报告和inflate兼容反世界，反驳transitionAchievement的Supports。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "accountability-interface", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "别名能存对应claim但value分支允许理由/commitment脱离，不能作为完整成就规范接口的完成证据；也没有achievement实例履行。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "将实际成就的适用经验/推论面与同一claim绑定，检查匹配的Grounds；不要由规范接口宣称真实成就已获证。", + "current_analysis": "transitionAccountable:172按同一achievement的实际经验方面构造Grounds；ValueProcedure的修复另由T15审查。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T08", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。", + "reason_en": "Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "reason_zh": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。", + "classification": "D theorem and W countermodel", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "通用语义与非空见证阻止同题正反结论；实际三前提冲突显示不能仅逐项检查。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "meaning": "Given an admissible witness, proves that no question can have both signed consequences. The witness is an explicit premise." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59", + "meaning": "Exhibits individual models of each of three claims, then proves their conjunction has no model." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "simultaneous-and-implications", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Theory含全部选择命题，Entails/Consequence量化所有模型，包括实际蕴涵而非仅扫描字符串列表。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "same-context-noncontradiction", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同一admissible witness使正反结论矛盾；不存在证明现实理论必有model的隐藏步骤。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "joint-conflict", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "三个单项分别有Bool-pair模型，联合P、P→Q、¬Q无法满足；关键反例内容真实。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T09", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。", + "reason_en": "Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "reason_zh": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。", + "classification": "W retraction and context models", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "时间切片撤回旧命题后保留相反命题的可满足性及联合冲突明确；三种上下文变化分别有非空见证。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "meaning": "Exhibits satisfiable time-zero and time-one slices whose union is unsatisfiable. No temporal update mechanism is implemented." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102", + "meaning": "Proves that changing any one of assumptions, meaning, or scope can reverse polarity, with explicit admissible witnesses in all displayed contexts." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "retraction-and-opposite", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "旧/新slice分别有true/false模型，联合无模型，编码的是撤回后的状态而非永久兼容要求。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "slice-consistency", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "slice显式给Satisfiable而非直接Consistent；在空附加假设/全scope的自然问题上下文中，可由同一非空model一般定理得到一致性，未引入实质源外前提。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "assumption-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "固定问题含义，仅世界假设true/false变化，正反后果各有admissible witness。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "meaning-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "假设固定true，meaning改为等于true/false，反转判断而各context非空。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "scope-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "假设为空、meaning固定，scope改选true/false；不要求跨context一致。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T10", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。", + "reason_en": "TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "reason_zh": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。", + "classification": "N/D specification consequences plus W examples", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "单向报告规范、语义变化反例、表示顺序不变以及独立revisionIdentity触发均达到冻结的规范接口范围；并未实现自动检测。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "meaning": "Instantiates the reporting interface with a supplied change proof; it cannot discover changes on its own." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "meaning": "Proves swapping the order of two singleton components leaves theory membership unchanged." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160", + "meaning": "Rejects false reports for three concrete context changes and a revision-only change; also shows reporting true does not make an incompatible assumption hold." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "semantic-change-report", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "held/context语义成员、meaning、scope差异均触发报告责任；报告真不反推变化，无不报告变化的许可。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "representation-order", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "union两个singleton的顺序变化不改变命题集合；仅覆盖这种表示变化。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "hidden-context-changes", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "分别对assumption/meaning/scope构造¬SameContent，使false报告违反规范。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "independent-revision", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同content但revisionIdentity从0到1也禁止false报告；外部已识别文字/形式修订必须由调用方赋正确identity，不宣称代码检测了全部变化。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "report-not-adequacy", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "true报告仍与新assumption在true实际world不成立并存，不为修订内容背书。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T11", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。", + "reason_en": "The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "reason_zh": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。", + "classification": "W witness plus D norm consequence", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "两约束有共同可行值但非同一谓词；同条件正反后果明确违反一致性。修订责任是采纳规范的条件后果，未声称已实现修订算法。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:186", + "meaning": "Exhibits overlapping lower/upper budget bounds while proving that the two predicates differ. This is a concrete compatible-constraints example." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:195", + "meaning": "Given both signed consequences for one question, proves inconsistency as defined. It does not construct a repair or establish which premise should change." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "tension-without-conflict", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "预算5同时满足不同上下界，0证明两谓词不等；有限模型展示不同目标不等于不可同时满足。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。 The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:186", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:195" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "conflict-requires-nonretention", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同题同context正反后果使Consistent失败；在采纳一致性规范下不能原样保留该状态。未提供哪一项应改的价值判断或算法。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。 The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:186", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:195" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T12", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。", + "reason_en": "Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "reason_zh": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。", + "classification": "W truth and coverage separation", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "Bool模型具体区分可满足性与指定实际world真值，并给指定问题的双向非蕴涵；其现实重要性不由数学裁定。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:205", + "meaning": "Exhibits a satisfiable Boolean singleton theory that fails at the separately chosen world false; satisfiability is not truth at every world." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:216", + "meaning": "Shows the empty Boolean theory is satisfiable while entailing neither the true-world claim nor its negation." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "false-assumption", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "singleton w=true可满足但在指定false world不成立，足以展示一致理论不自动为实际真。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。 Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:205", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:216" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "undecided-relevant-question", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "明确检验w=true这一选择问题，两个Bool模型使正反均不被emptyTheory蕴涵。问题被指定为关注对象；未证明任何现实问题的重要性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。 Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:205", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:216" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T13", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "Reflexive现在要求一致的原则登记、同所有者对象、实际问题/理由/范围/结果及方法契约；形成、应用、修订内容已由有限评估与生成函数实际计算。", + "reason_en": "ValidApplication checks owner/key resolution, inquiry and method identity, nonempty target-linked reasons, limits and the registered meaning. ownContentEvaluates proves separate stated outcomes match the evaluator. All nine subjects receive assessment; generation excludes application-phase subjects by explicit applicability. Insufficient results are valid assessments, not correctness proofs.", + "reason_zh": "Reflexive现在要求一致的原则登记、同所有者对象、实际问题/理由/范围/结果及方法契约；形成、应用、修订内容已由有限评估与生成函数实际计算。", + "classification": "N specification; projections are not executions", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "系统/原则/三阶段和两类活动的条件覆盖已表达，但原则形成理由、适用域审查及修订理由仍只由活动标签代替，未完成冻结的完整规范对象。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151", + "meaning": "Requires a coherent registry and a valid recorded application for every applicable same-owner subject and registered rule; this remains a model compliance condition." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "ValidApplication checks owner/key resolution, inquiry and method identity, nonempty target-linked reasons, limits and the registered meaning. ownContentEvaluates proves separate stated outcomes match the evaluator. All nine subjects receive assessment; generation excludes application-phase subjects by explicit applicability. Insufficient results are valid assessments, not correctness proofs.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "objects-and-activities", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "系统、原则、formation/application/revision过程均有独立constructor/phase；generation和assessment两个活动均在非空ownRules中。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Subject包含system、principle、principleProcess三阶段；ownSubjects:226含9个对象，generatingRule与assessingRule分别生成/评估。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "applicability-conditions", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "owner和rule.applicable是独立条件；自我身份不取消已适用规则的记录义务。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Reflexive:151先检查登记一致，再量化已登记、同owner且applicable的rule/subject；生成不适用于application阶段是明确条件而非自我豁免。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "formation-reasons-scope-revision-reasons", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "没有任何subject关联的形成理由、适用域考察或修订理由字段/问题/评估内容；十个预填活动pair无法区分“仅合规自查”与来源要求的多问题审查。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "增加最小的assessment-question/content接口并关联原则及对应phase；明确三个问题均在责任范围，以非空解释性记录/实例证明覆盖。无需证明现实评估已发生。", + "current_analysis": "inquiryFor:172、sourceReasonContents:180、assessInquiry:191分别编码形成目的/范围、适用范围问题和onlyAtZero在1失败的修订反例；ownContentEvaluates:287检查预定结果确等于算法结果。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T14", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。", + "reason_en": "noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "reason_zh": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。", + "classification": "D conditional projection and W boundary cases", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "适用性与有限检验反例通过；自产修订分支没有与同一主体/旧新对象关联的自我产生事实，仅演示任意局部生成函数的观察不足。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "meaning": "Instantiates full reflexivity at a registered applicable same-owner subject, then extracts its performance record." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "meaning": "Derives record scope from full reflexivity, proves its classical conditional/disjunctive equivalence, and gives a valid restricted example with no system assessment." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "meaning": "Computes success on sample 1 and failure at 0, refuting universal success. This concerns the particular arithmetic predicate, not a universal impossibility theorem about all self-tests." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616", + "meaning": "Retains the local observation countermodel and adds an actual owned before/after revision with the same unsupported global claim." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "no-self-exemption", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "对同owner且适用的rule直接得到要求的record；不把identity与applicability等同。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "nonapplicable-boundary", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "application-only规则可被履行而system assessment缺失；说明不能忽略条件要求所有自应用。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "finite-self-test-not-universal", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "实际all运算在[1]通过，0使n+1=2n失败；有限内部测试不提供普遍正确性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "self-origin-of-revision", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "证明生成函数f只在0为true且zero observation不支持allTrue，但未表示它是某系统自身生成的修订，也无修订前对象。作为局部观察反例有效，作为冻结自产修订分支欠对象联系。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "增加最小producer/owner及before/proposed关系或共享系统构造，让其自身生成该candidate，并保留当前内容性support反模型。", + "current_analysis": "Evidence.lean:581–616将GeneratingProcess.owner、prior和outputRevision绑定ProducedRevision；OwnedRevisionExample同时有实际0处改变和1处失败的支持反例。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T15", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。", + "reason_en": "ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "reason_zh": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。", + "classification": "D semantic support fragment plus N Grounds", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "结论弱化与范围缩窄定理成立；完整Grounds规范中的价值理由对应当前claim仍无检查，不能以该较弱接口代表全部来源责任已保留。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "meaning": "Grounds packages a nonempty facet list, coverage of a supplied applicability predicate, common claim identity, articulation presence/alignment, and every listed facet's discharge. It is not uniformly a truth certificate for the claim." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "meaning": "Preserves support when a supported claim implies a weaker claim at every world; it does not weaken the record set." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245", + "meaning": "Restricts a universally supported property from a wider input domain to an included narrower domain, for arbitrary world and input types." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "same-claim-support", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "记录含实际test/result，经验/推论facet的claim与target必须相等；不是无解释support布尔字段。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "conclusion-weakening", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "假设同记录支持p及p→q，推出支持q；另有删记录会失支持反例，不混淆证据弱化。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "scope-restriction", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "将结论的量词域从wide缩为included narrow；不扩张观察域，也不补造现实可靠性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "articulation-and-aspects", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "概念/假设/理由/限度可储存，facet对齐并要求所有声明适用面，经验加非空in-scope world排除矛盾观察空真。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "value-reason-correspondence", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "ValueProcedure不读取commitment或starting；替换任意不相关commitment不改变通过性。理由只需推出另一个任意consequence，不能确保陈述的是此立场的理由。False-commitment探针不是要求价值立场证明为真，而是揭示对应关系缺失。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "给可审查的立场/理由相关性与后果关系接口及非空实例，允许未证明的价值起点，拒绝不相关重贴和纯自断言；不必强制reason逻辑推出commitment。", + "current_analysis": "Evidence.lean:28–59中commitment由selected/adopted导出，reasons依选项变化；JointAdoption排除无可满足起点。switchPosition实际后果匹配选项，并拒绝反选项与不可能起点。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "full-compliance-versus-interface", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "当前接口还允许空limits和恒定非空字符串使关键责任空真；原文保留适用性，但此代码不能由字段存在声称已经开放于相关批评。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "为作为完成见证的实例给实际适用世界和内容相关批评/响应，不把整个通用域强行设非空，也不将接口当现实履行证明。", + "current_analysis": "Grounds是采纳接口；每个已列facet都须同claim、匹配表述并履责。有限实例表明部分实际履行，不能把定义或空适用列表读作所有现实责任已经履行。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T16", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。", + "reason_en": "Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "reason_zh": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。", + "classification": "D union theorem and W mixed case", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "面向义务的并集/标签不变和同一switch claim的经验＋价值缺责反例完整；规范接口局限另见T15。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "meaning": "Proves that discharging the union of two applicability predicates is equivalent to discharging each separately." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "meaning": "Proves changing labels cannot change duties because labels were ignored by definition; no external classification mechanism is analyzed." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362", + "meaning": "Shows a discharged empirical facet does not discharge a union of applicable facets when an included value facet has no reasons." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "union-not-exclusive", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Facet是单面向枚举，但适用关系可同时选多个facet，union定理合并义务而非强制单选。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "unlabeled-duty", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "空标签不改变applicable责任；这是显式规范设计的定义后果，非实证分类器。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "actual-mixed-claim", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "switchEmpirical与unsupportedPosition同为w=true的主张；经验面实际discharged，价值面reasons=[]使义务失败，非两个无关claim标签。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "three-facet-and-articulation-elements", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "四类表达要素和三种责任接口独立存在；本项通过不认可ValueProcedure是完整价值正当性判定器。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T17", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。", + "reason_en": "Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "reason_zh": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。", + "classification": "W countermodels", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "所列不充分替代物有实际内容反模型；非蕴涵未被说成结论恒假。价值反例只证明所示理由/预算责任失败，不是价值真理。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "meaning": "Proves this articulation passes the nonemptiness check while its assumptions do not entail that the world is true." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "meaning": "Combines explicit countermodels showing that repeated measurement of one coordinate does not support an unmeasured coordinate or a budget consequence, and does not fix the announcement value procedure." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "meaning": "Shows that adding a claim can remain satisfiable even though the original empty theory did not entail that claim." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478", + "meaning": "Combines empty-reason and nonempty-but-budget-irrelevant self-assertion failures, with a joint adoption witness for the latter." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "articulated-not-established", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "非空concept/reasons但emptyTheory不支持w=true；另有不相关articulation与facet对齐失败。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "measurable-not-relevant-or-correct", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "第一coordinate可测且重复结果稳定，第二coordinate可true/false；单次和重复均不支持未测结论。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "repeat-not-value-reasons", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "action=true记录与budget0和3都兼容，无法支持budget consequence；非空announcement自述仍未履行价值reason→consequence检查。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "compatibility-not-entailment", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "加入w=true与emptyTheory相容，但emptyTheory并不蕴涵它；有true/false反世界。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "self-assertion-not-reason", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "既有空reason反例，也有非空真自述在budget0不能推出所声称后果的内容性反例。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T18", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "有限价值立场有可满足但无需自证的起点、选项相关理由、限度、后果和批评响应；两理由联合充分而各自不足，异类方面无需统一尺度。", + "reason_en": "switchPosition has a checked admissible joint adoption and rejects the opposite option and impossible starts. jointReasonPosition combines benefit/cost premises with counterworlds showing neither alone supports the consequence. No theorem proves the ultimate worth of the adopted value or every starting assumption.", + "reason_zh": "有限价值立场有可满足但无需自证的起点、选项相关理由、限度、后果和批评响应；两理由联合充分而各自不足，异类方面无需统一尺度。", + "classification": "W/N procedural satisfiability", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "具体switch价值立场有成本/收益理由、限度、非空批评响应及可满足起点，并未从空理论推出承诺；异类支持不用统一数值尺度。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:493", + "meaning": "Exhibits a coherent reasoned position not derivable from empty assumptions, and rejects opposite-option, inconsistent-start and impossible-adoption variants." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:564", + "meaning": "Combines empirical, inferential and value examples with a genuine two-reason combination that neither reason alone establishes." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "switchPosition has a checked admissible joint adoption and rejects the opposite option and impossible starts. jointReasonPosition combines benefit/cost premises with counterworlds showing neither alone supports the consequence. No theorem proves the ultimate worth of the adopted value or every starting assumption.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "reasons-limits-consequence-openness", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "成本/收益理由与所选择true选项有具体关系，推出cost

r}MgIQ)49Za?K;B;@lxckK!2 ze}#NfnOR4B|I0@$?A$*unYW6^Pp6mt7TsNLe`x#LAa1{Yn)ILM&wP#MSLgDvxuqQWpO$@q zC!l@E+wl7wZx-7B{=kypPNYoZ650@%MrO_T%?2 zbkM)PYScfxzIq`~{jZ8GHkr4tpDz7RgnaFJTOHg#BXDZ}vm3h?^Y+caqw)J8d8=w~ z^7%g=da3^98~FDL-v1OIJM?Uf8E@eIA2~zTU6MapZ-|}emm6|~7i(OgJ=gC9?#1?K zy^6W{_|?yl{*!+Vwne<)@uT%I`O*L95dp{7X2_ErV_QwQ%I&A?Z?TAjrca$5+&D)5!C~inv?Bo9ek$BVhf9{ImnFb>(%y^K4G+r}f{V zr**#ySpPxZ4c-LZu3dcnX9VsA-skY1IRWdxndpCuw0}pZM(_CgFBQMLY6P!E^uIm$ z`Y)D#Ul(}c9G3&ue^%_L_3`bkGhFaejwJgVQw?hBz8^7); z&+ur-d%>Hoik}(D@Kmh(^s{9gmWTdOrvk%`*iZ3UweN@DD>6JD@@DXId~DsZ62lWQ zZ&`t#K9GOLCk(eM^hczW`Lr^_y_naW;Enlw^6DxKcVm8c17F;uYJsW@_bT+?sMa`M61Tmr#&9#%H%8!_9&Y-%I>)h};?s9jbVv<`d$BIHg4ZiH`+%AZcjNfP z4t(U(d4JIbYO%g|D)g(mmfTpI$y*`s2Jb|t@k{G4+==tQUf`<=ezw_vk;BLFA0K`n znE%sXk9X8%@@B{z!TaH}s$=Rg+=%nzX5jN3mW`h>+^Wz&YwzrD>oeSq>$7(7j`z5< zssY3817IKUsap?RY{+o8LjSQji$*kJxDoPR@P=-gecr@yS8u6bKUZ$uCACLCW4ICf zsef;pXOC{oa0}$k;B9!^rDqd{n|evTR^W~2q%~^FaJxePv?e-rGlqLC@E<&H;njaN zXSksg>;~TQ`zbS9Fx;!qe>CU*U!xiB>L}&)^W-*d?gMX2hMU^R{YK#94c&&fVz?Rm zDL&>NDgV*rM zo`m)cH`S837x;pupB*(bTyK{++5c+g>N_16?x`tpBY2g+t(M%8;f@*-Hv|9I+tJ;L z;Z}wI0d308{hZ+@$lJk7h<8ozhZVdNSkb14aubhg1`W3_N z3jL!-{yMcg!)=gvf|srO-l;tp?k*+uyMc$la8pe>598 zv=_sjdE|a0@Du8vF7#%&8T%bC>0oK)&$KZZLM z`uDW^BeXxmt&n$v_gmGfQC~A$pF`^R0@pqrH9VH%3nfnW{}jCS(Ex@!!{I-8{oYKI zFPrjlB7E16U7yM0lOV{5jX@QxiVTx-X2@Bw6}Vm%q>g9b#XRI*D)q$Ry?mc9o{*n( z`f!b>e_%WAXSIe4UE(9;lb|mJ+bU-^&*ayk)3D!!=iYnHX?I71g@BN!R-wU`{SUO?w>2{*tuI;FYQkN zPWPdGdiXkc<0Izc&=I zSo(i|&t_u?ix0i`Fba5qb)VJ_WjN`l=Qg(0UNt~tkRFQo#y~C(Tca+rnU2Ym{siFR zqb{`wV>s!j_bOJdU+^QpZ#xNcDcE{D&Y4Z`O%&}%!T&Vi&Gxq%lpXrTa~&~jWWQ1W zMl6wWn4|IB3x^-nUxFW{;75UfGxw@JbpJf(M=1EQ;8!SF;60u1B)%9w9>usy0AFx~ zKWVrgME+>*Uz)=F2~ql!3i(!*`aaFVpAe-#x~0$DZ%B}StKub|@^6C)L0B*e+ytD)QB-5CQ_XM-aI$aJ zVN0H1;39AAYo%Tlcs6XcrN&Ox(864rtMc;?NIum?2lzpW4<~3N{r8T7t@87|^8@*A z@J+d+6GD6k{!~+hkkFszko?F6uxpw0|I4KC>!G?pzQ{{eW66s}J4Wz@J`o@HFM;jv zTQj{NUCgWtuN`^`*CfUVxkF38hb(2MV!@0(|XbgMBAe9nq~ zF%^~L*6=_+@3!^sp?-YaM1xP)mFpip_a+R167z%s^8~dMtI!{_C{TZ|moL_ke&Lr= zUZ@s&(=^J(vKENO9$&5(oliZbvO6S1KZB~PRy3Hx6i9( zcnt1Ov~Q4gN8P&M)L_&xA#ZjB)(_Lsgq#|NlYT3B?@pEvqdF+$lUvI;m=dM_<$1b& z8*Iz4&j~rIFQx9b>Zf5i>34&-vf{`IT8=N5_XpGXsQTN0(;CzT?!SJG^y7yejk0MO zZdxGiqw(|0mRqAW7M1@avjevS-)D=A)Uo&( zfjfbR{@QP5I-K*XYbrp6Xa>)6aBy%CFxHd0OX;YG0y3kV9H1+P4Cy`Y~(a<8x|;+kw;g z_ZWxv4Q99#xD#>AxxLRf8iu=pC*nHs+Q_jjwG8(Hr}cDNZ_nBghU+&-|LJ(AaqTg) zLK$uZPW9)Xx*d!1_?dxIed*H7wVaPnD{!hG6SS4uviNF^u+I+Ovu>4VXJ_pv;<-7h z&n?H@8l`2p8*)@1J{JFS6K~%Ooch1>u}%rR{fI5HK2raUANXb*k3ZFC>c9IfYF7=Y z{~H72H)`v_L0Q&+@E-JN?B(@8!6DnH_+DLx#K=a+H6! zM+MhZTQYDfaLT`^so~MV47UTP{8MjlmxIqQPT&-u%_pX{&@%b>*>c`?gICp4Th6L^zvwcVUm z{#r3l9bc4Kh4;T5a(49Jjv-%^=kuRwnq0R~d^UG{^@P_CH{>ZkBYsJ##Pin+oW|$P z_cizM`l0_(`bXn)W7El3wGQc_@Xxzawr>RQ*zy<~uMbY>Hv=!bxY83o{%CyB_=yVp zsN&-%agEeZ_Ps7LrijC z$G86_9n(58+Nb<5gV$@(%ujfJc*#EC_2OT&38*ira(vQyqTbS8Rn$_wO8Do59Lu$GtPgQz7w*|pIj~hJwtda$?>K}@a7rdF49UZdjA1lpwSa<7xlKzivSFmzc z{S$@tg9*GP-mdd_|4{v-`LTC!ziz>njQB-;FXt~BUrj>hEY+f}i2RQO?u7noi}EfB z1uo_*yTV>Kcon*Id`oebt)bok_hP$u%IAy8FVP+ym%ES`({D8^9^%Nb*RWm2!-Vb5 z!M84Qe=XQg{*;L7|B%mzR9a3|`S3HY~vJ&nu5a0~WRy-7Is zx>;U^TdCfI*Z0faweoQs^Qi-P)Hgl$=V!PJ`)NMhyf|t}0fy_b9`S&;!S!38f(&%av&ts}c*%9k>@Q?j1$+cwIbKZQ+X{8aS=bgp_n#j$D(fHk6N-;4 zT*R80uUF)^1N@=o{_IfHl9{huzq!GWExoCCF>_|Va{Q=v%DBv%Trs$~DKlT`uMzy$ zW53u}!kC$_^w$FZ!;6K+8w{EGN`LL(ch%TBl+U1xHzvC#lHLcJ=FFG*4@c+{*G=c&l7Fy4U?-8=%BlwOBf&5tL z8yRh^ulAkSHMbZ_V7&o7p$`2yi8hSX?G0x!UA9aX^daVID48)yg;9; zHR!sT&%X5Em2)G%Jm1QG{@fD#bFfMJL4QR)Btm~OwlymsUM;SViI2e3u%Ffu#}D4B z!mf*{-QP+5IZ8HG3z;$#F2^!DnBPXR~bI0R4?yoShpw=`;Tj7I+fmV}oSe zs&{YX`EuE))k2rRQ-CJ{pLAEh;$#0w@xaw-z{$U7rq8-}++p_LiYeqH_6GWwr*)Us zn~%;)*B=F({5xd5ljoNuag#}Z4De}UhwoEk$I`*$=N;`Y{`cwEIx(It6Xf}h_s^E9 z_;^l$JgpmwriI^P<2h44B!OS6(Xz-~%#N&JT&HIl-jDdXNUnKA(Y@44tK12umg}ylWP3@mBx_vS}KMXjtIa@R_)}~kS5wxnc<>*6 z`CgYJGO&H2Us=DBz^^;;#)X`|>uUTX_{#c~3jXnbDx~Jpakjj#jp|nrgT!^Uc+`=I z{W3nmz@zb<^Tl;F3-$||FK+5Io6G}}JNo;8m7m3juOmEWt*nQQu3nxf_VsLFI5oFL zy$QgBT+l~#Xm^)Ek52yj&mh7*z-gRXytWskcQ?BRT&+3~X!lp&ujfm?b{UX*D_wZ z*7A$IfE=()S6&AOeS`zWM0ST})h0^fn{`4-iNXki!U8^E_<-gJY1z4pJe>AkX? z??Ao~U-gTO%bi?HwuBN9Td__|QCx2^f-fk-|74ucA$_TrCyk&nA#fY<<7J*bw~Wf6 zHVJ7dPyI*7H;$8!+(G6HJiY&+r`*UgU#l7JA^q?>SG_-51v8xbS9M7G`MzYWPz`Y2 zKL+5`KaVF=7@-AES|jVcGTtW0&Fr?|PKb$^8TLD1pA|gsG3N+cFN*k(|1>Wp4Qbat z2zmsb?my%!wm4`}Gu(syE^MEfPM!&7c)I_GrT-PTPsyzT?(3)YchgYchp6PISMQOd zNA#8d`|L=6Pp=7jx)(S;?!>hx@q*#QHL=)F_q)2z(_Q1TpQ)c*h{v<FZODlo#83KsqVPUF&Dyt`{zqV-AMy~-|jyrD0LEqWg`N%{3F>P{T^AM)L*q9-D@;(ici-4T$eM;7EyBIHxB6}UKV z^|J52IIF$eaU3NGzE8-?BE#2y-+iC>pX2llR-J!6@7Mg@`Z92>6Ynce)JQ!I=3L!P z^Mj}#rlT@WNt0!Lv*3H4s{1x-6^;qMLBY4-d!xp2K{WP6+u|eqjV&Ve2FYD2C-@Rq zYYg2bZou`rXTLO<3##8gx5EF5n`&2I6)~VUyr2TZ9u{j~G@y+j74I$hFoQ^ZX zT2)GPUTwA!xY`1|AdaKT-8C&QvT$k}lD7e;^+T@(M<140r}jTm=8J!j130Z8{v0@P zOG>Y*%}BoscuBFt_lbNzIajWnmv4&yMgNh1)PKi1oT$^`&tda{2dRz+`q!de`_3^H zLj8}-i1rP@$-mTh*W6>b{aBOqn}CylMQ%6OynLJFU#kgu3vlw!@Xf99^Di%oqxNmU z$-k*pH^yFg`Eza3?*Lv_?C^c+Ps-Nc_3(rLkvcJMT)_W-=2wUZ@glwl@>%DXZ~me9 z|0?68TN0m*<^rF8S`+qDooSn`k5*^!n=0b3wE(BO*=9wV$6*Yo@ng9!^K|@`x0Pu8 z`1NCaIiTlN{=!3Pog;7;_PZdzr@|#q2-6=GCC4S%*YsGEc|iwC25^`5W)RItlZL7pG_<58o&YLm+U5%$}lH~zBpfARKl z{el@z@o|8+XL`L|8sMV;-KS*xbX?~G@5mX|Hm#zL`}+g92isOfSH7X+Nr6ZIE$xWJ zHpfui0a~vLJngWIr}2c0TT0@=rnFA=;TlU@DIX+VRJFMFY7zeR=Yth;G_U<(TJ$0a zb_)Gw;C5_(_;0_J{1CVv`<>Xvehdl^W%6$9r~cmd?Wt^ZK26Abfm45P{r>1vI)5hO z=|wy#pY+Mn&%@^jeX2ZfCiIyQMR<9 z%eObtL1|rM&+{nr~;R*$ozX+x|!AKh&wfPeZ;`yL(5< z->K-Q`||Nregkk9ww9DnCev}I z=zkCT#kED|wFkWMZOi^nb(8!Nd>8nXU#j0_Tv8_dSeoW_&UYyIM(~%l$YZD9mEnAw zf^PwT;_ij%??eG@eC%x!MHQn>sZuoneYUzZ{UG{FxH+@&>OrF5r|u`@?I$;q}G?obuah&z$qUL;AM+RtV`=4vRCj`3cd;a)`z=0by?IK5Bin#TfslP z`0zJjq!?R~4=(T>;LTdF<{8~*Ec)ACPxezI$h<36dH`TZa_0s(zRR%n48e|bD?1z3jA68~(;ZtghANKo4`RWGm)vVI5 zf*BqgBHO2Y>h}3>yLi5MA*Vkt{V!c~coz+mr}!Cxw>+?Lg%-Hze=qul`qK7LCKXA2jQO$`zfCi z)9N+n{yTtEK7D?2xI@SMqxjJEw7$EucL}n}Fbn-2$WuN!zc-XuGo0e1`a}A;?ZD^# zgBecpR6qUs)_XUBl!lJ{I7=*=H5i0vGv`;FA4M`CaP~##;nK&T*NyG@uqz9f^VDm*RFhxJuc*r{*v^&;E75F!od@`6ZL}Z zX?~?&3+^xVhXwLQy8gG0_Xiyx*??ESvF;x4kJyHR^W(lX_t%n@e)}Lt{ZZ}eDktv` z4{+*_2b({Xk1;UKr)1f1fzO4adiX1~^f_ATHYtCUug>OYS+<%bQtp+ie&x^GDMYk@uo zcvCK|E1wtf7W$O+)D2$0ts~#%Gg9Q_R`8YcwHN%0iRXUJZ^+E|Je2Dbs@H};W&D1= z@H(o1J~Q8?;G4m>cR%-_U?APUesN>{U<0qowp$G%V298D^!5J4ASv9p^qZ>tya#rO zZvvgwuNe8{o%QjTjr${mDqeN&Y+FZ_W;%@p%8F_k`2&=6K*= zxVy#V&E3L(cq{sc@|})1bFI9%hUW|AyY;G!o2thBoGf27svd#){&uA&RI>l71e_P4`Z)01;?Mc{3&UU1KgyTta~?cbn}oE?M-y<$mlC?8>w`^x zSS9?Y^`!+o>yJwsY8YxVDh; zT;!_?IOU%WJjac7maOvIgFK?~;{gBE_In_oE&kFve*8q&1L=6-*XzBi^Wz2m?ZA3aVgJ1KYKt^hwC{y}BX~<5zkb4w zztYd|_zSd8tmvRw^JdnGYalcTdAeRm$Lsbzi+|_G)5$nLL;3uo&C__bNk}6;3j3bk zE*BhZ^22`pmeVqBZt#|N-ndX}%fKnVUf{F4G&vChT;zux{-yW#9T|@b4(Gd2tJFh( zg+F%aF@o3p>FF=%Ju?EgoejJ{E~NU38r)wS1)fF2e80IE3fR-%!i+Q+y4;tJ}_G3jr?j#fkH+lrJXm7A-6`Bouj-RlZoj z`@Q|LV><9ee;AOzRIl&enb9Da;gsJ_$dAc$tbA7a?FPR3sC@hX~%y2z$Gqx`$_MXE0)94I=^W9Ht8@H6& z<@mNkj@m!^-}^1RJ~LFUnqxbK*<=eo`_t=FS2Vijn(Q$AJ0){U-2!vNm5uaS-j>fLnl9x@mKTvHD`eeyUH!+Mj%qjo}X9)SvbHf4-gG z(*yTC79qTr}-8#)3TVUHI)4|omM87AfcPvCSvtQkDZw$UXt7OBAR57kQ? zUk|N(cx^yDfSdo3aXmP=QVrgpv>vtspLFOzH{PG#7J>b#Zg<5XTgUtlIqJ_c@4pG- z{pkiy{dxbB9>;lqdVy1a+UKW^;P&euO1r5)>djtl;`5CWIQ2)172X8ypB?(m;LV+t z^Csm3?=K^GR`B|E_}G%_B==Vjo*le{;gQ30+9X5thaGj?1$@H%OXYJh+=Kn(&!cT6 zN9!4`dL;cNe}d|Klad>_u-A+6PU`~$_-=y0A3VQQnE%LL1)XZKd^wRuj9aOnVFvDqnbc5HWN!ylMhEx7|fxq6+Z5^8* zH5SG3*!eR99V&c;{l>?E^`gs(`~`!Uelu{&uUF-(T;ujzfz$jpx?R8F+;V6OQ-6lcau#C#Y4yOp*p81bormUs-rsh_NB>0n`{Hy+9IXox z4u5^Mf@cJ8LDBnV^RfQ6VBKi}uJ2O*N`8jhu%G9zCEoVaAB_% z>u<^@7x<^H7dsYVAxq^}^q-md;5{lgerO@^1n$9l+k*2Foo?rAp=I_^{urOixTxQB zce3@i#@#KjepQ&!sUuk-^jjfE`7wKYY6*V5(hi*RBm0vo?fLq`37pOcXb<$C#g7-< zz$u=c7BASVVfK50Q~sPQw)O<~Pw$m}(ecQbDPPrL{%MWCsXunrF<;}y6K3c)gLk5= zYZ>JY?=Q+PD|ioXlyuT@B#)OK`t0C2O~xCA(O*KJay{Y#FMd(vm?CDdD0onfZFf@q-ooq8nS>E1}QK z_tur?k?45C0sgT@9rGyE%khchSvPnuJ`{~A38ILH^8S3)bLn4=0t0WC%A$Sc{rLv) zM~(jKP3b^${m<7c@6Q($@!X*2sBFg!dC$-CIX4@=2QgjZxxobN7rVtcia9I!bl!Al zt%I6i*emczy#Fl)a`Sg>?5<%rz2Dt%S6J7?fYN; zh&=K_zy6hs%RRI3ZX3NXvWKU77S}dOwQ?{K;M4)CzZI<{R;xz8PEnf70L5 z`qxc!I5P9~;CWZbJT-w|X6o@RIqjMG%J-F6!7tIYU^1=aNlN6K4e@b+*YV9aP4w}S z;p?AF@o z%6OQ;FB{QZmoGXqUl|V@_`R!LTA4p8kT2q4K|Gw`9p2UUb^-AG@i-v+f$EV5yk*I= zlM6-$>JxlreNerY{tdcXc49Ip(EQKAp)L|H8SkkUc%&*gdt9iD1L3rObB)^*9;6p6nGb0bBroPWxz)Xq z{&&r%|4c1u>3@Ykv5I!39*rs$_8B2h{#fvx>=1n6PaO73`QT7h4LQH7s>`hj-)qlq zI7VX-tc;JZ-$GT@B#++LkOX}*5=So4!atG_e48&6?Uo@85g67pKpcIi*rW7%(??>p06Z4{`ShYW~MD)g*-FfLy(!%5x+ z-tLr|)71vQxbRP_dnf&k#P;3xwBI#MK5morpW=U_!8g+>Uxa)tr2(SurT!S$f4UDc4(m-XO%w;1 z>$f)*?L~qYdZ+FT=C8(DO8P-Q=FES;0GE%09ND`u@#UEy)?YEe6R?e0apo4g??D?& z{sNDj^JHnLNwy&JE$N|bpN@lnzi>C;z7EQxG{~1|QMjL)$#lD|E1T#De z`>8+bUhfg`Tngn=40wl|t$oYlqm9FU9sGE_VS<(Wmx%q;{?M@p2JrTiAW#0Sym7e@ z^^@?Q?5F-d^!7k)wLT+0X^2xBmd=sg zAXph6KVLCVS-}4(xqsep^bbi0zH*+jgTLftQsW#%#8%A5%6UpaV*ZMTe=f*-u@$&D z?$fEIpW?f(-B8s%Suc%VIgaRkcAkPoFJ*PyXP75>@z|Q4$?va%a)i@7B6N$7(68ht zzmmr_!`IJwO7oUvBfoIH!B#=ebDnE8p9GmDBTIeo=UwHv*=iGMl3QONzSdwDZE0SO z?dgBC-H-b6CjGr05y3J(oA%~1F8bkdk|1Q&uKkX*@BQoBJ=L%eP5JpI=&@j{swnvp z8(yW~cgy*SJLUPFRQO|u-0Y#bTr}P}-`Y&p@dWT);2-?9^COxsIiKE36$`!>e0R>V zUxpZnDYseWg+U|Zl05q1aXMc?Qi4zKnTmpbGx%jT@9d~ktdB*WCSsjM@5!@)FLe6) zLz5IE^NQY+_v56K>BskCoI7#+MRnkZRogZPS<~%Le{UM)wHNwt4qw+rZIL|sEA+X6 z>$TF)Q7yZjV8`!T6ZX^j*!vB_otjvwLC90RbGMNF^0r3d2wwLrkhfu5GPY?mEt7YU z{@pSUTseRJg1@)T1>6h${m&IC%HG?i^#C_U%l3Eoe}0L-7cEmhhDbjTysO;DjCKAOS*=k(|**`p}Zax3`Ce6)cd>Yh~~JTfz1S*M)fw=Oca zS`Pn8JVQq4SLUM!{2P58_j4-pQPfk)M_~1wh~GUtl5g)|Ei4q{C|Pm5lET^- zekpNjm+w3!co8^%5uua*30%w*M)qCU;SQ5|X+XXIwN0UxS@~gs+~I4Jf8c)Du%Gw2VK*^I2f`8#6e^KO5*gs zoyY&qatT@S5##Uwtv%oMGU&HsJG=dC6~)D`Z;%{EWVZ?D^V_XnQ8{*K8;!<>)q8m?F!NPXkVN{BO#yILE_Q){@#9qPO; z{h{;3vEXm^to&M>hvxAR`t9ITo+p5RtyR(aIUJe!Ch#rTCWGJKJawr!53SViOolzU z&XWfIqrbj7Db7PH`3C59os@EsIc5Bc54KF!TQl>Oc^dqEd|Ul8 zx$>AZ^Of;Q0{?BnlxyPoFs1#<_@siLkd%L!cuq{oSH>qIm-M%7%HF%;IWZ+)8J}qI ze=x0|ES?in@|E$41HW;^lU8E9a=xg;k%~H;2)>W1^5v^WRa^E8y>GB~{5F@s#7E?F z8u*l__i`0%nBAR$N9d)0syJDnI`=!XB%I+oo44` zcpPxLPjdai#xc1Vo&cQg^C}z@zd+CMB;a(Pmos;x3Aq`b0-TNqCLD-*ormFR!0EbN z^-3;nUWP~Hmj2VaKC;5EZSpZZ3OKFrciy))63w<&1Fnw9BmFNaQ$jU!WQW{W)m;-v-aSvYPw(em`fR{=FFtM2o$wgQ(|hx_ z=+d5@s~Kq{JPtU$S8kLsar*1#75!;0>U{!m^6$jXdHb&{ol%G6lYo3^KQeq>k?*Q;ZMrvRt;Ze03uXzX>(7~twO;N)NBLosJgsO-5( zJ|bVBf9)R6?$xhwufv2#0Vn@TEpFHRbG>#6>5loM`Ow*YTf#t5blJe+{3EYf<>< z^1dXW2AukDz}3V7vo@J2K0y)rrT^sLq}44;3|wuTPWq#OR}edVp9?*Mo9;e+-YNbU z{u%H)p)@{zkF4QseyZb8!s8%M{+)bqJM7ZIcB0h#YuSStPQT+92j07VF&YiSjmQrh z;&^2IUsjDOLw^$FX#O}_yhXs55=KJlB zC@B4>`6aQ(gzXxJC$GSI5WE?Cf^KTP8S-glAMl8=gTq3ZeO}zh5eGcqU$biKa6gBz zF9Griz;#3N{usvM69M@o;CTzLYMafN5uX(7r}=GRujnS(8LsZaIL(ix>XaRvjoGJLCF2tZJKmM>{XQJ?FAnlFe=b?Iy+Rnn$v*18 z^SLbhc>g6qJ_hOq#PV;k(bC(UF3{NBb!2A2JlW)UV`w76~fDe21)#Pl<{}|v2!2gS$Uo<<5ZyM}Q z0=~y;TN#f26~}E+=-1ee@^~Z#ym2Fb>6Qa}WVXuV@)*Z2ZUH5Q>d_uG-dFW z$173bFa2Ui>mts;^}DcFdAt$}ey1Lv-Yn|K%vT<-B!ItS*s`Qz_RM_c@k%oIaYv8U zEN;upS01mVf$yGsU}*_!X1?-xC9B;G6o?SC=$r<}2e95B|k3 z{ux!ul$o!LPZIcRihf_Dv@tVZ8J|?}yX4Myw~Qe(Um2f>V$$EyIUn~atIy0=#wQy5 zM~8FdDyItMi}QQR<2fJ2HxK!KUjWBxaga~MR^Z}1ri*!EW~_g|c?HMI0%6YwA}>BsK^ z^}pTfV*bV*n-H!qA?>DhSFr}QSKRnAybW-*5%}W?T{?(;rt=0@{Z~`zKAj*la9Vd2 zG+vl9KB$F%8RfGt$O@d+T_4N!Y&|&73&PcQ;QocUPk-d@9qR|RcRUnriT-s0r~7Q^ zy6n=};IYc@U`?y?Ac|3EwOPwo0zVSf%l-FTZ2I>FTZ|BTW8zhhZiuRTKgeNjT z3J;xa`d`;=EjwiUW2%4m#s9i)YeV~Ye*R{Q+C(kOt?-A|GikVfQnYAXt{{uVv$D?( zeVa-y8KE`@>htB&|F{lZE1fL*jq=V=QpTrlWUrS+H;w;Xkc3@yoz>fz1-qCKkLk+}~ zTftZ6bsYF*Kdae4i}z-xUsrZxJS2keDR;ScnBqE~sB`hCb97xf1$<$Fum3crPi1`R zy7G<2uY1vbPrt65J}yhk_@rvD4OLqukNygMk-%fIo!%pM zX>gom2s{D%Dc`>hpYG8xoYviRUAePvYGWE#LOu!dDcI_6#3pH(d>Z!Cb?2&=Ebb77 zN0gEFr{KEt{Xx(6hcY}0I9+#+|8dSx9m8XQ({<+yCFtdE znaXW)MrP(K^E(Fo;#(&6$`z5BPuHm_zvIELF)8#ny&}KG`hoJB>XgtZuDj^a&qgX!2R|2iJZ5R zQ{^@dzsI2J_-S9|ye{}D+hjYsNEx3$kJQ{>Qka{7DA?=J)OPWYY!KEio=BfA}~P<1!U_lm>YkmywlZyf|NsOB41B z+kO3_R@IXIeWaZ{yEbxOt0k63KYRx~$Ob+gFT@T{jc+sh_g92FfYb59qoG?)1-1G} z=ZV!W;B+sjb%mqCo=rc!7V^R`4{&a0gepiw`zuVCwt$Y$eEWkVK9PRK<|(Xr(8EBMrZIvl@Ie3koMj4%2lr8my^VSnx>%?k4V z@M1stQ+x54I67_={iUxW{iFHs=I?*E&CUzJ68511G!V_FISc{`&J2Auq;ZB5=w}+j(ivkoswjxo^ae1mBJOT9Wa-Qa;Zi zs&|4bK4Ki|n#npwy3)XxxbJxCrEHIm?`|z#F^0H4`!#Vj0_CfoXqnxw+^=7)jjkr+ z6N_!W)Ab9J9e(*vf${~SYR=^HiIAhb|6}Q(i9rU*5aS{qcrvz*vfum}%y88!Iq#+Ylij8PRH@0{g{_he>8ZT|14QE8Zx6l-&q6*Cy!w$JD&=5!GWL5Qzwv!?|C|h`_EW(- zaI?%|`duV39&ET@M&`@!Kte(541Y$H)H$H zrRDSV2EVvpp6sv!FJwKrIXA=Y*l&L!+p*1`Q;A;eAlfH+CwNyME<2W&%eR-uRg@{wnbi{yVYX7%c4^5p!m80fQeFbs|JrC*0sq zt$I7LVCLhD5M`b4g1`8$8*_c-I^ZMfud+@Ef~dcd7*~c`GHwRkPi)3_$`QdA`4)@) z;=Az6mLUD6`ttlq*ldy!^(j(OpAr@Fs%3%lJsZC7nIW&%I27;I`s>ZX8KQ0R5$)@0 zOS|d(*0}3MO9vrdBCfFt{gL1w8da+#)iJ3}>Pv-v(copPH+2Qob`eLVKSEZ-F&T1k zkRzD{d?%j-U&PUg{Zc;TxnX)3B(S#YfC5^!%2!rpzZV^o?Fwq$K6N zWP`7Ge#=lt#_j&k56aQ|LpWdg{FWJfdr;k4p+v-1^mDYLpKag^is&bLu943F{XA^? z9e&=A&I7n1ccS{58Fb!T$a}Fr1OBG6JXg zHXT~^ffjn;j)-rFN)azJvwg~^N=chggs8g!3$oo_&J-ySUe2%q@T1N?{%`u{A>(20VjLB*WSfsXSfA8%}2E^ zhwcam&h4e~Y6E|C?p9lJ7*zou&ZqI}0DoTfb*E^)C!wtJ&kcUf|E$Zh`WLZu z34&q5U%Cz(gX6|zw3BCUwl9=*TG+2_SLhaXI1zGQY^e?#>dSa2>u?nI3we=O$-U%! zME$;X$<9JSzT+jr0Y6V0-8)czah=afaQOttCt>??^ZRevdv`SYKjeCv zuIIcDn(>?;2d6=f>|5D(MP05x1$aaQ>2LV789(sz(ElH0-yPUg^~Im2Ssl=@0}6&| z8A4P>QNhU22naz@Dl_aNE9`&@0Y!?e2q#HBaIn-MZC<2XAbzQhSd6qo`=chMfJ`6 zq|ndL!wSGB`@`H@2@y{;8cxG1BFCW7eFyg&K6VgJBT2Zti=U6CwHEREb8626(>GS< z_ic3lG5%XFu&z+yGd`m9RT*z~Ij;`I}u3Vl4 zz&W1&>+e>R>svN()8oSa3R}lIrSdSS<&g^B#ui7;#V8MhS{@GYO*^~KQOkqcA(sco zhXPCGWPx2C$Y&!ZocfWVbWU;1+9B!z-}i1`H@}E=lD>?`MY;2}!qW1(Oa=e(Ezdy8 ziw?3=m8a{}UzqJ8ZZ@Qu`N9q-&N)BgN9Mn{F66_{f0gg7T!X}XY`~88-MH@|E*;c9 z)bFgap|5k}Ht*^Lt@v-GJt^N=<$>Si>2))?Ph|n(tMBiao)G>`PrO>iz(k}JR~ycV&eBUnHqkgAmX(Qq>ucG5*k}@!oJ!{ZD$i_LxoA^|(g1AoSR4z`XTzn11{8Hd0&;9v(#o<3bwwf?H$PZrs<@+*Tf6_hC z<+hwR@u~e;+lsi@k+y5J@;HyXgu8K_`=OTF?)m&2j&L7ve$G_1p!E)U-@*X!j3uHS zyNcSZ(IfsO9|E5Hv#4LS{@yW{?@I_T1nylb@DZ*3Pw;p9;rJEz_v8<)gV@>$f5sj# z6*m*oW5#tm(z3n=zw>(4gd@J~K`qY>e zqg@(p;5#`5zwz*qi80!x(X8nAg1_^2-H|ccrBU54EdYMUf6MiY(JqUh!xn#UT2b_~ zd%NC0Q)`WcrT9;{9F2ixB0l-hYkpG1r`71wXJhPFQv6k8h#T#b z-xqL$PexF^$TNui<#MKS<$W{wIl|tL8=TO(gz1FmK@Z=z9C>l|z3~!W1f1s!-L^H= z=p@|ol<E)L~^Yy@~e*2ViN(2A#Z<{yd`!x*?;=2`oI{3+_ei~=AGgG9*w{d+z znhE}h*?*ie*`oPsy~zRpfe)_VPOwJv)p}C^e!wW+1eI|-3v$FEyLryXDVKM@;lo)?#BMk2DuDdc*;@={dbf_a8}>_Q z?kN1>?`DrQuk;uzpmMbVXTR*}_I~Ua;ZES(Z(QhJrjPUHchR_eIai`rVNC zAw9Wz^Io1GP`{wYEdbu>?Hwkv@2rpNi5fS;sGj7){}AMP|7A@l;XnICe5xlFTo>~3 zM*j}6FPe3yNWDlOTlj-fXC+q2LFH`)--YLK>Ck6h_4NRrzpw=H{htZF%+CbB(Wb!U zSo80ErGDf{_J+%)cz?#nkNq^2@_DuELf`(ZqDW5{#^X%S2*3IHW$SKx&mI0dX$f%& zPX*4;FFy{{{-Et^8GiuRI)HP%tMW#h2O1exZUL^-D9;CnEZguqVRTTv(L653VIHq) zJ!ZQbhkl;$Oz6)>dg(%yWAgh$!47yo5BOb6K~?$vA(juK96o(=S_7>$l6@rq0?3&< zi#WVEwBesRDSzJIk;|ipWkfS>r(~Z4a%|u4$veBq`DXy<{Qn-`I8)Z237qYG?)Ifm zc)u#rpADSbRfBt%J%s+)=km!stKBEdr$Www^jfQz&+8@qy#FJ|FMdtYeR0CPNc=M)$NN9d`ef&~a(uIa zv;D#Q=Qok#n+u%nvw!-dR*o;nho2j`|LML+>nw?n$tnEi_%>Vj^Wb>k)bH^AkZgY{ z_|p>$e&sm9orpgLu*U)3AEy#3O7YNzUM$@Y9(iof{jz)(cZ0xxCYGoy#Nb->Ek^ z4y2#!Q#yEkEPoYA{_8!sZi1bMH*0Rn_GjZd=U>m;VYZxq4&=GMH+3}aCg<&m!n+{L;Q>x!#CqivB4NxaC<9kLy1dy({~}<;C`#yFGngoD@$7*vb*H+1IvEsA#$$~hOj4{z79@pBB?-!TL2K9&0c zqy^yXj>q+jwZEe}&Y7MQ{@*j`g(gW>j*v(xuIe~v2mk9g$2N&IPgch{H~5>U6?pia zKF)>4b9I~}jOL>S81MX$4JyusC_kZ+WVgUT#<7)QcbzjoM*JV9n`*dmDME{ZxxvqcSJ;ZWhTwjFiTwhbx znZK6bOSC*M{OA7X(KGcfYaPN;l1~H9_m2-HzTZ98dx^mp#JHXgzVUhAn*Vw)k$+ds z1Aa!^mihnnULy0e!EZaQ><9n#UScl%&I5mS^Y;>Cy_cxL`vO_un_dv{pa@Xh`MpGr zuX;UQ;!}C>dx>sb&-tWiq+A}ExX%78nbCi${9a-Yf{C^`r_Oq){U*;FRU=E(zn5acesOm2uV3z+8>=1jd+p43ga74!|`jk(zaZiM$%$l!13pK<=-d28yJ^fg1aEk{j6o) zyfRt|_X6j3@#>TwedB@Cc&f(J4}SM=CLh*?`(wHOP`_*k9z=S1$LV;f9qa6f2iK>% zt9M_Q>yt~dXJ)l(-^%vddWv|kz4PM6ERpS1%hL&d!Ht9cW7%s4?nc_8+TTYdd-Z-? z=lH+&ivAwC-$~sq#uu)?fejOz$oF;mkY{{+eoipnT2ekCyf@Ey$Ja9cW;`5!qivti zZ|x=g=I?fum$5v*rTXPrE#%$6HNAzOr!GFf$e`Fu zeD^EDKYqX43jVVBb4D9+zr`y6^1wN+cfJ_XlfQ=~d)5BV+(*RYnZ+Gmj`ba+ z+CFXIw|!VQp1y;W+b8K)+lLGMltaEX^c|$i=lA2ezw?1#>FG&l={rc7PxBJ)@8s)| z=SbWyK%U2;LY&Kd8i!1Mh2K;*G{5G4gZt6^_2T}D@L2UCtG9T*_V%Q;9&S&>r6X3o z$UuHCAH3R}pZ5tiWt0N2SLii2;Yh&zu*<&Xb#GTtw&CA|3kKgi8|cFp&?5?rgPF65sQBAUNO zU0(c1_oZFvl;q9B1brf?}F%` z&CKsF{44D3@g)YBDN^G5?-B9gdAc3^!AVC~CHbTIUWM-l|IU$76O(<>d>8oK|N6n7 zqxsra#v9GIgU`=9L*Ne@YZ+WN#`u-{z38u*uNffxZFzWmyA)Tn{$RDz{@TF*;NdZ2 z%+ce4(Xa4b;LqAKykR+ew0gknKoK9`j&`<6rRm}J60dP7@0~lrCn~iUFZK`ReMWQ3U23fj z2}Oka!RLMC7S~S5jF<2raNcM1TkG~qItkAQ&illb?>c0>UcxnlVE;`Dbj%>( zR^UAEshs}uc%y{dfwTSP?%m$XB;hXL0X)Zj_+0(I{JVD%|ABLV^6=ha0}~~AKXC3( zc3Gb^%lotjIe*;$40}6&wY*PjK5*_&4#dARSKg;pGg$b~^MTHHCtAvuRRhj{U$mzMGmq zwqKUdt0&}FLVi}ebx*YXu<^slUu#Ph_-f#1+YEc@;^gu_vwhwyF&?r08hvgQ$@=~E zh5TB`?+wnG>FsHm$@1(U%g`? zGK77Hye}{0dN1?63f~5PtLl6IAG&)nd5d!)IuqBokaj%R-G`&f+=_;@skDNMM*~Lte5+qS;1BMe>8@&v=DWb>@yrMQ^!s|O zt!9np+ZBEgeD@Kr@g8$D->TSO2!7%5eUIK-njTsARL3)-&^YJCIAa|q;^jn2IIX{D zNaqp0vMv++1NY5gKHbN7m2s2w(EK`Z{Dt{Y6N@Te#v@=_R~S!Otx>nGF(d9wGc={dYUoa~dVwrr;gd4_gzy z4UHU>zY{o*r?t8?X`Fz17b_la@Grl*V_zcla6&F&EG*$Jxs%O4^qAl`QH6=qZsec8O@i(b6N}dSxBerPs}vhVI&gL zul_E4F8GtStSb}a{W+uhyX{5bf6}>Qn*?jLe)V_TQ%4CuJ(u51jq(1RQT^Tabnve? z`T1jh=Z$lr{-IE5cbVW5hvMsRCF0NX#@v6;FV(t)2Ey~e=Xpnu`EQ%zCA^6BVcuBu z!hnBu5^iw|e^~#CA7S2=%ksV007?y?KKI`AK_G`ee8 z_3uUCdfP=&pVUfvfQa%oFD zU*)*T{2Ya!0sioh(ls1M=2N`0z|R72ORFy@C%6QI`js@)R}a!$@KSmt6(pivvOeOg z?Wq8Kd*QVaNp@zI=vUj5WsHc+t!th0l5Np^wLLk&FZ_L6GyZO$r6Tq`BFc-`4Lso2 zDjX0ji~dvQtL-Tp{Nb&tJ0cI6nH)~3A645E!PL%jxSc@WG*743S+D3{i%DfX^l7{NeAU`c8Ge#m|Mz^>{f9Sr~cm$9`CbK z-2dY`>mxqR1M(!jrYy9%nmxfoA5 zUJmfS9lv!0*A-UKoM@Pb`Ub%sDoc>??xD>)aoyOE-E>er%)ow19H$`o z0@vy?f%AOz&gqx`i3o@PP&ummG_rlpw(nPBoy@0tXPzkHWkdRD`5ifI7vU~k=Xp{e z#~fR{RcHw7yOj!MoZgS~wxh-jdUjC1frG|0eqzX=kpm_*esa{95gmt)9N2i&m?8Z} z4xQX@+|W@YBW$V%e&j}BlQpEPghbFUM5qpn`e!=V!ez}J& z9hGPm8VKioVr;;FUem8~l7u^Po%jDZTYbekc^{Wl>@(vA@7Er$e#zrOL_e-`yrxZD zUZ*VdQ~9X-4+p?sZFlunzvm`>UicXT@8hRltik)SQ2aSKoYoYsYW^esBLtqk_AL9Xj|3QD`{VT>@h`$f`%h%hCixvL>aMQh0 z9di6bxX$q(Qn~f?Sn)3e?dD*qLK8~Bs1jr%KB{58nO310Gj zp26j;~1e>WP0foN_t*NBsM_-Glm# z={Ir!7eJ)`zoOKCoS(LCjO=wt*_5jPz`q$#VQ8%Q`+#r#uHwX4@ecqW`sIxaa{NQM z&hh_v+xs13#lH}|eU0CHSdPE>)zbApW!BEw{}q25_!&1&u8tLd4f1hF9pf5m^yxS@ml4HyTe=zsjsPZuNgALkFGl{>^lIsQe!+g;x6jTL|M6cGoP z?b_m4@wWm0Az^iOIsQ&u=lHK}>{t;i{%-KDXn));$KQwRT>rc8Ea>@P@ehEX+vs5B zSn>D5&k%Ue8S;~PzbP6|)cJ^Js_^^k^>2L=>-RU+`G^(#HqNS5Ds!Nb(mYR{j}S!j zyh6-NoRH`5<-IuPG9f;-uPj^_^6|#}4PyO|=TZE<|G|;3Op|4q@5Xy5JdetQzFM`r ztp0BMsT_IV6J93{BA=GdlSb7)Di<|hvN3XB1-SyGoUdh?@Spu7 zK9!3N*M)p|UxGbi{*)HPJnCZ+pTEo8*Gp$3R>={zyO^J`SMc4?xBJqND|%}Qm;NJu z9_~N+{?ZSAqf7S3_cJliRwI8{+ zm)0(FB%JR@d0nMvorR<0oDx1$#KR4}N6&8QtCescuJbu~zQZo18{il7$v-D>>uVw|Q(nmGV+1eaKm1G2 z6>)lLz`aYf67Gf^<5!2+HpELf`{x61y5$w4PQrc2-;K0)lYb7#@!|ccLXaP>x!Z^1 zL-rNoI>%+?hwkv*e*X(!0TJ2 zUo%7a!{g13hU;HRhJ3g_72C`0*$RIBqWw3@*kC9Una}On4!&pc^Fw$XV=3aR_0J7{ z%E}kdspA>()%NTMzisc$Uzu4kQtIcT+H)AAc5Xxc2|-@-MoBvl_iI{cP5H{fcqe>FE@AIml6j@$Y1W)Io~Ykse7j0 zrda*DnlITz{kjKoL8NSRA(2(i%+>b?^7AH^BEDbY=Yg;5 zJ1jksiAbsZ>`#{-*G-uv@rblbw^+|h#dDtA&pz!Y_cQ6>TQ3SdtHystqBzwzgfE6d0zvTKh(G3m=bxdu1Jy3zP6En z$|`Jcc>IJuH`0Tzo|wb!nEX`pCqJnD+Q9cA<$VnTIAeL&LVf1e*9K7nd*38`>tH({k7>h-*1KGb-qER z>woosa`sc+bdY}2eBmGG->Z=|RN$Pyd+4FcvV9KVT>qMN%1MyzD}Y@Y;8n~W zzeW%JG=5|P&qVoTa(;6^euC?Puom`$pABB+*Jda4Jc0b-`v}%|e)8gaa(xfsev{+X z|M|?X<#^@ccRk{e>HI3G{pI}Ae5K>HE1;UXtTw z0iK1l_mUQMV#TWn{^x+V;Bv=zV#O;Dygcw;c(})$1gr3f;-8IvfyXt|Tf)EUKe>*_ zc%Q?Ns_;|6@4e~6?MWOcq}0!={Vze0@dbL)A)n(D^)wUb9Dm}|_~OTPAs=23cwO*w zuul=s2OR-hMOl{kG!EF5aUfsP7p^zj0{q^|{ng$WO!A&Do3z-o;7(*p62{|f3rhC` zQ@4Eh%Uk*dE}=iXj~j6A2aJ`LE-IXMxIS>L8#u?PWn<%KZya8Cl5v)2eDvoJBtL%j z*PmE_0P_61>CY@ny|%H{$|H=2fb;KnzVznAe?Cv}6#rgMA#nC@$7cPKxXUj;!Sd#X zrTxZamx%m$qOJHM^|@KH@azgTQP@S1cXe7xx2a=dos<9+FWs%LKC|66&5 z=W7-*F8d(&RLvQEw4^M2P&*IeI=7=k8?G*iHw&EdQ=dySuSVXEG%8>DAbt7Jr&%Q8 z(7);JxjN{h`jP#x7>7B2_da^+%9p+dR?W^0?ocsv@=X%cl%ZKADCC0%{;?fbz{}ALqA6I8I z$5F6FJZ-==Zwvotwf^IpUh<#q>kgqAPgwg*e5~$9I;HqzHZ2{W`R5<%`e@ZT{{oM5 zLodgt-RJu=cfHY-=UH(+;2a<4zUs?fy`=ww^#_3SdwId%^l?dVREq4oMgE3>^L-?b zXJhNTisG!KrQ{&K6a3r_f7N1NCmt7J2Gy%#zUQ*wr!GbuLhtY7d85qF!~B`|gG&eB-AFfy<012lRtmk$ z&ji0?xz6*|xKO|DRQmNC@JT0?LvDc>Cs^OwiOz-`6T(ed!hT-Y9XsVlH?5tdg}evx z;dR}``pQG%oF#bi{1CuIJr8;wn%;h3yo49eSHN3h`=b)CC&=;62F~T9 zKm1!$URMy-h<2~WI~Q_p@5p#{y@vcx1zv>o#~VXV##-04Y!v0PV$}0Dwe}MK9ZN*~ z7=NNg%6st=&i-Y9_rs~hZRB-bj*kQRZ~pj0tsEa-*Ug6f$F1J+a(p7?i|ZU0ljCSB zjtk+uuFLvIO`LjHE}sI(o0bYcKIr%8Bl3DoDz5YR@kF41S0l=g+A+7EOz3fdKlxx> zb#*-^5^wM_z#FJ9KP*9tR~D{w|FtF5)+?{;<|y_&{l~zGNs@dXa2_8#W#cEw>$+?& zxA!9OryN?rVt@~yz|=k+mHJnii}6p?ySp&pFBSB zbEi2^x?J3U2uYE@Tj_`FkS7k6JHH3WdS1UgGl}&O?gO9S16(??#zQ=xAv^%wnI-zO zyPsyXmgXn=5O5Rr-@nqd=>{IZsh+Cyp+fNM{aqL|up>w*&Z<8I(RkyAocUc5A0GSc zIA@=TPvcEGuG2Zio!`IYzI=7pRYNxJOzTEC#XSpr9>+QU-+yxABU!i57q9UtanF(R zBR^DJ6Xk2`6V zMgO_ToZ#U5LDEGB@$(L1Jbg##^&-F4f1hv3>luPA_&%+eZ@It=Al*`-Tk*VA=JR*z zcKpt7KKKV5qetpZrS}t{_7p%|dELH>%VjTXDQ;Veq@9HP~W$I(1rbw5Aq|kOldpwBtK%=%jLS|#p>z*i@m9S z5tr>xj=TQ9*qaXis;aBLiDhqkmD2WRf=_-?+;ea)$DOX5a6M1r(>}p=`0GN-a-4F# z*CTL+l03&UT>p)xl_ljLj$71oF>kK0Ti1MG)O!b14w{ao{c=hAhAXz%X z^+KNtoX#mO9;KWMtC!RpD(4)Xs0Rro5I(q^UrIdQKUO)1jthPk@=3Y*=+CjrSoOEvTf6;t zlouUTUaCA@C%ZGCCzDhBu1Ge{*#_d1-9af|YM(xQcVDfcPo6& zS`i21%QcFBzmD>vgZMV^ok(rq4`uywp66VSL0y^ zfAzi|=S|jVz8ViV_;pg;6JtEbHmLFNgWs>u!f(~**i^67c#s8DuL=>D5ahW%Xx0n= z)OuyXb&{v{!0k1!otUq@x@_(*aWUpSyq?VSp2V3)yTqFJINFMSFjPmI>FCtwPjc=dtFLgz2H;SDDDBA%k`74Yj8az z@oCf50`Gjc|+0UlQf zeZ2nKw!V=X8LQ~N%?A8_5(pnV9~``I+EXd*>3`}M z{2t*C*ZXb{b@6EJgbKW1m%!c7^Y=?r7VtU{wNodq``8Y=Ke~E{sk7c5QB(Yf_^waH zzLX*O6@XmFFK(^UWWK_&k*V&Wk4W zcPvHxT=03nJ3IK>^ZuF7a~wMWp?DVU5%J=6t=&E9Z{|8eco2MEm+W?D z?Ln&q1N;!yQ9fp`hmd?@^3`PbtUo6GBJR^Yr2)$P}uGxEBc9XR(Jms15JiCoEP$3AG4;ksj$3!K_|xjz_~u|oNNBOr*rrQ z;MySY3&Lg1yhV>(dwOfP!NBzn><`KQl{4SCCi$=RVSh)q&++=LR!gmqZ|D52n?!ur zzEM~HxqEcO^iho4fwO(x?;V)2y4=75;93{(OLQT8Or5FyWc0$?@6!KNK8^#Te(}2V zUEAj4Y+txO8N879Bjs`QtM?r{xtvHB9mLN^JT%}3k@k8&X)u?YV2k`+;1_~tcyf_W zUe{FHqxB;Zk1wi!dq7>+r2N(PXa|4X+czz--ZN9%qZ|A^y$;_aH42>)$J2@m(vT8DHVwlnI!xDfZnMQK}W zsq=2qU!?Q{9!Z~kU(Dkbx3@K(!5_z=AENlE?~CR_&rjM%cnc~rIdagrspd-njZ@i> zD@4lqS~m;-xep>fjZ_f4%4IF)Z6@HF7uKR4SGI&T6Grct{zW-b=vR1W0QA@|wgNp%xk z%oHi{Q#&GlxNpk@|HOyyJ|1H~17k*q()=9o2Tz@|hMx;?E~MX~@C(2{TKG=c82cF* zQ^9xQ{>}1z*z8fY5P6k&#n5^rj*j^Bkj@B zsr0-y8+@Wt`KCIBKHh)Ksy%y6>lKO!F9JURe>y)BdM;kVEn9?ty#L49SL#mHNq8D? z9#_&Dz1%`C;pxD+U)Q!M`PV+i5bY4P5`!#hF@<$=x>x+>)>OSykEymNH7x>S>cRjlCf$r6J z?gXw6_{IC;tlzfv%7Z#Dp+bM)1tEVN^2Zjz7)S&i<8Q>pm-*Q%pi*qi~ul9#o;4jtpkB_m>s3Ak? ze{#XE_*(waa`tHb4uxL?e)YvUYhvs(YDiW3!_*uRm+3FI`i8%6*>&)S&i>%CUxH~KVuPFqDd(Gwb2Q(G zHkyY7ah)!Z|LSuTehx=CeaET!O!&{wu~~Z(|CZU|hs4oU^9c{vKVt!KevZofdW?9isEz6)@iV~Z`(D!y5vO2W zfkrJqinCX#H)-I*KApXfs0Y07NWSi*hcG%QJ{EkZ$?<#c*|sZx8TiH%z~i!^kKcQ& z@|0&y>)O5uJuDxW3!LA3EV`!a{7}1kpRoP{;Mb;f?@HHRsz0K-{lIULkH|^hv{U%U z@n5TN)ph!PPj2S?Q-O2*+i(9_uWz1JjrBW#m!k{equMjA`Yhbo<~jPG+J6Rcjwi?e z=MN_CP~#uAN1q9MGa=XP>EZWt+zHRYb)LU&$*uNzyp?hj`%2Ul|7tk3;yn7h`Y!H4 zV&#Obx8*5k}2dw5?7C-6BZ>`$;?g!8@<8Ni$D zZulE`y=OqFeGRg4oxiJ3p7LnrWUH`%S&kG-MCQKLosQ-#go4#lHafQ|a%Dz<=f+qqjn7dSo41?eB;}<5dRQZE8@& zk@q!7$2pe?@u_{eab3uVpV#4ij%>V7V);hQQ@uND-sJX8Tsp#bN4;MXfW9^BpB(&O z&q0dc{{Y{Uf9*u9=OBLc>->D%yjS=|`G@O;j^7XA-;>#%{Q1#RzbC_dtUp$nU2%{6 z`$S&gTrXPxIH$e*`$T@=JkMD6bF;bp`$SYPgTVPd=F@tfPV_r7bWpkSdniSCuO=V- zlM65P<=>AGY{6IKuh}R39r;16!-iC5ij?%L@Aufi@3yM^5u+uV&(EPa{x0xeAAF{< z$yECN8=4n!{N;K>^~?@Ge30jHKZtXgPxUMh*U2KPH~jsm>rmaWw+4^ z9?u^v`$b&d{@!OYSflwGh3^3W-!I-TYm9Dx#{6$_KQ~#-6FlG#Dl_WKa9BzmG~Wm+ z^NnoqiAeRriSKir0nvV%eU(w__fCtz=kIg>{PV#dbas&q$y+`b{&BrK?KPD8JyZTZ zHx0axucgf8=f_kp)cB@@*J#JCqp_YFtMT=KpZM6-qFB$3)%a$E|4{Jwjabi()%fOt zKUnv``b6P&@n5QUYJ3Td+)p5GrY}T%(vT7!u4h`ObWZ$S54gSv+gk;*+-)Poz`QpNn-QUXR$^<@DQeUO^^21A2Kqp+c2At>yKo zOyInpv#>+aLU}zZ8#u4$oE&v(nNHH53!MF*UFSyeIt1lkydDbP7hSL1HAwQTpZn32 zuO8SX>rXu(;==K3{@wiUdP&{{+<|n{TQ_eRfm46uK)xBkdA+n^kH88Ocp4nUx4bRZ zOH(123AwggPEAd4GgG9*SJww}z+W-oxm$^@Xue5VUo8MXrG7V0k~5mGt|wS>MLfRq zzSp1Mt7fT)zsmi-1N`Rgzd9G={pzUoRS)=U+po6pJW1BCt|w%JAIy99dv(4<_NeO# zdEnpmcYaUlj>GjiUX!o%ucohrzhnc|CthFm;deul7c9G^^$80JPY0jd!>QBFKZ}=e z4{&Y|nHio@ItkAL&h4R7kIU!v5}pH`+e71T4j(c|cph-J&(dh?mqrOM0?zgw%OCu$ zNy05(3xC$CqIvx@0Do;Kl2! zSK~xXAN;h%>eIctMDATFzD}%vvVV0dZrClwPs{78*B~DpJL3AtYyWJ8xM zKP}((we90y0w$=jn75@X{2ZJ&p8m&uTrXt4 z1$Y|L0;J_$(2d}FBJ+z-UU^6@-w6BW#SJoZy^;Aj3f}>KJ?k4|xgIf};*|xy2fR@; z9PgDueV}-#{bx3Kf!``#DeGlTA|<}sf98TezsvN&Deh>#+J6>--=S+ygV`0$SNqS@ zZ$&%?Jzp@hoHLrQ_MhqCpD=#zFK>_LJCy!26a2a-KKP=7Et;RItjFen|BbaM$ot)~ z6vapFKMTOW`u-!eV(ojU_MetR!rw-}ZX6nG-#fMcq`awLO+&xqfV>AO;WU5pN#|5A z{MbJx?-wyYI$1I0b-oV_<2q*xah>nK4jv4ziDAM_^7*U}_g}kCR<0`Fe`&rGesDiE zE$>oezW)lx$;iJCX$3FzsmSk*>{edB4f5EJvoF=rxu6tDm|uMV$?*$7u9v0gky!70IDzLQ?Upd}kRe?tr21n1zI1&Ucy9hL zMhWNfI2aK9@t~?V!;AMN^3G&&-3dL%C+I6_GfHr-kF2Moac!?S2{)Ay@;=DtZ9RW3 zUcv*o&hyY#wf-2WlkgDmEbOD+Y02#G^b%eOoX6cWHy%1;kZ?C}^A92pFBBf_ZUj#8 z=K5WL@yG_=-nnHyH6c#ITQN_vL7x-6r^e^o5@N(N{Z~=1n)F?AGFCkOkY7G&bVE6w z>~F>rAwR3&cz@a7e8{oCIXxhuW2l;PDH~KY}zqvn)`}*fz4%U|a4MC3mZE&*JaM|Ag z@Is`oFMsh)EPov-!ann15f|<3s~uwb>xLd1c-?Ncxt1jP%k3d#6?&#@d++;L{&<%P zfBFPo`9$`|554Tqj^sZV$o_bN2aygbXtFMrKkjqFpM3C^_1L^UmOn1wnj^yA`H7bs zB}@L8Hw!!M?F63t$)@A+_LBC^{uUe(&kcKiyMI{`!zF``h#4@rkm( zZr}l=UwHDa#q!q)JcP8fv*k;%{IvluM4DpjS*eWVuk|P4C-*naAKP3|7C7|>>iB2} z|McHel2aVq6NpsqKX`m}fq&#)Lk)9UG+!Mbec=0+Zf;vHHJY!Ek3sMkRU1{gyd|2i zj*o@lf1NO;M+H;KIt)qDx)6_#n6^h0MxN7RJh2`X@#6JJC(dO)tw(0yIw=T`JKA7K z-0!DEG=`s_hPqe#@u!(hfa}xnKAHc#cz^%!h95Wa`;RnkH&cV%+Fm|DR**KgHAX zv+$SWG`Yg5lhS*=`ZVBt{~et5p^M)eCHZvVe1E**{Mkb$%yS6$0Oxt}CtiPx-+LqZ9N^qftb3=5k=Jd)c=3D39sgPM7RBIPyBQg$)=xYD|Ko}v&(C|) zb}jy<)7`!E8Mho0{`2$R6BBl}*`&G^N7=Y`o z4~p@G@9($v&g-gm6ROcr`J_Xh>&K2|qn5`@xM`~xM?B!o`fWx#orGuMdIos4w{Bjc zm+&0mTtAL|*6^bIerFzVt{;~^9#=+sf76f#JcRjp5za50Pd{mLMcgRG=s z<%EdOif8=V`Q>=X>rr}jr4@V;tr$56)3no9U;e~|@#&r{=X zl(m&^|D<2-FLJ@ZzO}-p6l*kJ)n5eu>!-(`Hk+gQs{YiIA|BPou4_$gg8LovfW{5A zKcef@PZgnGN{4(VQo`we*e{(^yS8l<`P3ys_;}-`e)T(i(f11dPyKKRd~c2zPk5bq zXqhYJcsw939mKb77CaaDg^=HQB{(zIxS+nTZapRJnf_MO^)xQX2kCd=dlUX1#0mcW z-#+B0aX~(aufE^z1^=I3KQy9oK|YADzTX}I-@B%228|2yLGiXL<3c|8#G`u4-;?nD z*_bD1Bxqei3*olY!e4IJ8BMxo#7npnIQRQwR=?kr?^{XU4V?S^W7i*eOE1a$fETyh z&%g5;O7PM{@pTq8I+kRp{AsXR_ke?ZHPNWmw zKUKtjGoRuU0N)E<_ttkO8eM`x`K$Fi0G_YhjyHLHWqlEQmHHh5f83$>ED3gImgraO zx8{uS_vl~l1&Pu1+o0BO8~8Oozj-jp8m(Wg-!Aa0jz7I6Il6uu)cWlMe{%B!Wy_RS zAL(b*`b`w7_h!U32>C*!gi}9bIxGAX{P4c$Sa-|(NsQn7Ke)S%_XDGHN&}zq3z>EY zfB#7BGVnFtf5!9dbnsgy*stj*6X_uPTuQt2DE0(@72_r6cmA&d9oZf#XEncE$p3wE zc|V?ubC%Q}tN9T|c4R}Y0IB6%Nn9vSHtC%BUS++^Tdm}MQObw$ILC0p#xAw`oGWgqtqFKkVDS^w7jv^8HmRaPF7y?{%abkEf)c z--mF3_xa&Le?l^*{gf z&CPYzh$25A<{0rR-HD&2a2Dy zK*WRZGybaOugLQ@!tKDhT|E5hp9{FY$?>6^$Bt_^Xu!~c{rV3d)P6L|Bm6!Y?)USdchZi( zZulO{i#);#=chAY7XI?OKyK$V_aPiqUV0mF?iXube5*f~E#Xe!ykGa*AJ(3zmE!3J z&hxXkb1D_ay99yceZYBs*s}kWVLY!QJP5l3;9dHr;l2b(KJ%<-FD{I`_l+JfR?fc= za(v&~yHb;@@_nfX?I0^#l-IOh_sr6HOYF-6&gK26dD*o%1V7^c6%jw4|BiTK{A8`Y zMBWXY{kyvK(vo-yw*mJdExWSrvwCldJh$fn@K-7i`PKlO`Zec=!fy6I1fG4%zS(^L zE3}Dm!wkF->F9TpUghr>$)8;8C&2b*SD)KM>n^d!{!8ihF=F;>205Oon_&-lKaFaB zRlbjBf4so&TRozWd>_y4!w)?bBx{GLdI^xoIB5^e|1_34{0noNtAa1ZK>3%o6_zI%^O!dXAp zrw<>Rn<(q|LyqgyJ++cr%KE*)gGfzBR&~=$`Z>P&z&qWWY~=SLsJ^(B`l9(w_&Ypd zdru?kRjm4A1utduy$ksLEsCcH?S|`1{|Dnb#zPO`Hqs%iWJ#nnEY+oU8t`BKTZ&y!{?Bn{7o-F3u-~Li_dz@cH zAY%XTB0gMSZeHCmNh{$_;9OtMq+eVfFX3Dt+~9SeJjtz-aF*x#uwsg*jV$kjTmb3m zGM7HrOY&UaA>copY2DlaoXXp$ly@O`FSHo)xcc4;`OE!-`48duGWUZve&2;~u757n zuNk?GTFLc~f0w`o`B&$R+{g7VEU(K~<_E*B-wkMRkbXbpINnc8nz3JQpF!Xp@0sOR z?~vP1K5%ZIGj6^xx>WlCt|=7$eb``lb&dn&ZwGD#-sQzwb@~0B2#)LAKHvJJ$7%UJ zFc)wx&tT2WLHr&Vl}G9~=pQk@d%?eCI5s!g%aIT%$Z>f+T-R}1 zE-yE5F0W_)edw56UOwPlUR9zW_@J;Y`_bV)}OIQ z%jGSXhZp5x{!_$Z|0mh=xgU}J4Iz#;@FtvZ>@O>ohm-pw;BCensGB0;UR-B?G@;h_ zm?hi~oc*bLA^nYVz{y_QzoqL>5d2E*&rd4v)|5J^d^9NkeDJQ%Yg@enc!Z~;|7Lrp zXeYj)mF%%y6Y=2w{io$Go{ZJMJHhiTow`---?@Idf#0t1@NZK8uJfgou3vd|cYe=K zkbMEjas8>bVtubT$-WS9u0QvF^;&J&{zBk9|4d!l^MGu>`MU6r{r`A=m3BHwzYRG1 zUu|foA7uZWz`4BEulS+4Whw;2dj)$531#k8@ zNzYW2%F~MZPd@O*W4aYpl5ow9(*B<4aVn#-gj<2LKjqe48eRoB*_(sk&EfIZ4t~=g z(qFT<*iw;F`Gqk5c7ZoPw`=vP;6-r!E=xA%ji06*{!^L{>WWOI>&M}C=SFcZ5qaq4 z@=tuj?}?NADFn{t|JSss^RyCf{!7Gz*HIqJS=Cvd&)R@<{dnQUxHCFQ-U*!R$Gj&` zOwvoZ8#v!jcC0^VgXEvy2b|+w>;1c4dA=K9|G>MoVc|xu7jk)U{Rx5Bq0d82_&!OF zmk;_1!Ryhi+KFl?57MX37pyl$e6I9~D}RrZHHnn?>U`1;{*Lo^`rd1g<~x=7h#UM* zE}Cmsw?*^)xUb{;8$b9dkGy!bhBcb+Rrn$BD^2_5(tYM=emd@tS-+-8`0F0HdX1u9 zL-oyt`%xQspS_X$dQA{19_spv3%ves`zF+ik-xgW;sw7$zg0bJmo_)D&ZMrd5QWxP zy;#o(K%ReBCm-iLeiNV8SBr3+&dIO5H^uyy-_xpBwoUVR0>cO4srbFGv|A!R=N8R< zUMJuPo{sCbrJ}vwy_V2cUyO&p-+HEWJNAH26k0b{ak@_HNm<}omI?VBNsiXfLehEI zPOYZ8@S_VU2p@9-y$Ze=R(2!(A1OcJJf18*Wu7dLC)U4(f83umYqq6(==Y4f;;6HHZSOPs~mk;9G z6}}66=j7#U=sCN55Z|iU?*re|>{tRlXO|CZANfkV3W85Ost?|pB7QtSPgtA0N1lJ1 z?+AanJ>0kA^FQSIw+%SAhu+DfUXbVCPT<@g?(A8YF3-Q+z_~p<_iv6vy1&r-fOC7e zaA?jGJU=J<1Hjq-KU{M%<@?bPaJK()nXh)q_iKf~+5V25MqH8a*UbM4|JnY73u-3u z{Tk(O1J3q;G3%|5rSEq1PT<^L>tF8ubs3*1C6ado=kY!7f!y_FOK@#bZBagTwL<2| zX4BC@t9~(Z`4vnkU4GBhZ?RP>A8kfmf%9e&7gyi6x}d3U0L$}tfE>SO(-KyfD*wB} zf5uNwi+@VipI1-luMhir=Dob-&x4Ksf_|+nRp1SQw`{+m+8pnS$RiT+zi?z}`$zQ{ zA>W^B{q+U@0OZs1pV_}Ccm1!dzo>!0n*bm9_~gH4HD48ZBa`%Ve7O7*`s_+$`@`+Y z5Q2Y&NFB9>ziaAkAHnsQ@}h(I0q{a7H?wBSpLum#`E@k43{zlm;J zfa|%;cYIT2%-Ej-J-pl+#*ui{1_?;f?wu{?=%nyLi_J^21>bLi}T`-^G=L268 zC;Z&sZTf{2)K7|sIv&`->(bMHlYiaDBZRqXeJ-@IORRD#td?g8Z&Otz|Mmv7H_Nq zwWajtL2uI6$=l{%FaIg)WxF_K`-YBmj~^GqKATR&?eab6th=YJj`UOHCl?*3{9JC3 z$3193*uE~~#}zA-{q;a!;CiNc&A~{qIPR0AP_+JR#DnLl7K8Bj?0HvCai;)Z35sNYuknn#5F%r64pxbWbF&XzE{*A_BYie;&U!% z_6O8&tNbFr;HTpI#dPqiw;9sR67E!GKK0L<&VtY1A!dTF2_ND9Lgxj}-+iu`GP@IZ z&S6}i2R^rhvLBvKi7O)Mh`hcCc$P=_?K-jLj8VcZ3BsQs?*ERRx>>^{;c3A6zH-P1 z^_C?_csg*N=Z;+QZmUEI54<4imj}F-{!4td zJ?DU5kXfcdnLK8Sl=y0UE&#tlpY8R_=9VrG;;Zf1k|^Ty_H(yQDLK)6wLLq)U$E-R z8FO|tUv1AG@Z-zRDpxKmnyMQa~}9*2luaE!4u6_+p{T2_`C0S zPsfTG(R{T%r-6TJ*TxN%(xdrmd(Hs=f^l`7%8qEh+Mct(PmilPs7hKiUv1C1;13At z?y;ms^VRlT1pefv{a&wXiRP>AIW<|t=d-6yR<33$&8PJ&ZqIT%r**m@0V}hSk;a1r>LK?1LynY_Z~ewoA09tcLC@7$E zpL~k%lOpen`B>znM7*%*#`a>mKW-zgvVL=ApI`zd7O2z{%b$AFk5A|&~I1xKJZsJdbUNm@Hi_Uq~EI8 z9|V8o{_lI1m&xJ(X`HoU9OZUa2tH9G^%Lu5{65I%Bg)Rx`Uw@d-7Mn6?d!8aRSV+% z5jZ060?zHrx9j$AItljz=k`@&@^cUBCEO33+t;(LAImmKcn~ zoZIhv4bxVZk#Ik7o=03vnLn83!*qnpr+B@rE!KnDRDSQ?FGei60$lI1i0^yY|EqV; zuawHCc)hGW3nqN@5TEy_^@8Z@@>a9OOoYzJ?tsS@2arl)yWA@KF;>>df3yz z*K}X?e9E=g=dpd6SkGhq71opq$@+OctRv*#TRy$EGk5(omS_LCe7tvl*eA>Ldf79O zZ}iHLtB>xSmBI2X$Ngj7<-HE@^N(;1$kIf(BC-;dPI`fHzln(H}B5Z?u!o#nuPO+R*<(a%hg65p!uL*TDzS?L#U z2P{SWe6FvM(^M3Gx7yLSF1HKjQ~wYI-v(Z%>GSub_)GFv#}5~HO|IS;X7;hB623Zq zc)@S}!O7G7-UmyOz3TW80RK$c;f3n^AH-M3k9_butlHtO;9|`s_5_vw)Lco#qeYM0 z=PNp+`F@3O2mh~TjkZ>@NAtbl^Z4NgU$?*Pk;=Acz6*RFKm6b?c&lOgD%NPeUEzno zZ$0o;pT!)_w<`8)Dhq$VNPRw^_oikkn%Al02Vs$M1^uoK@-C!=)B2i6IuDmi@jkBU zcwdz7EAJdBs2E2=(n0#|%D9y+=?m9Oou!+&f8_V-+kE#%YgR$^pm<+_|0%!l?`1&0 zrHY8h{_}raM3)k2_vtG|elDyR6um9JH~4PPFL_B;&RL|Cf11M2fZn(>jgKV9C>M*u z&jNq%r-j|hlvW>(fB1KmfafATI=9cMvfvS3gzG%6{5xd9D=Ek~R(vcL;rB~QzpY5m4xT!i%bn`Knm@^s-}$h^4mn2~ ztTW)8Z6H4R?ZI^+A8%Ce$1Kl_^}Lg=>ITlAxO7l^$a=7J9CAwQGpPC;CNV!B9@nRP zvQSg}m;6%o5lDU&K(DEqhztLIUmDI;znr*E@>HJuJF?t=c`olgz%mg(DwX!bS6W_| zqu{T6VzvF$B9LOgF>5k8Ts;{$_aOpqdbAQF{APf9D zU4O5kR~jVod0!J#f~fzw;Me%2(gcHYe@=0CDeG-T;8XtOf6?92{&MCEeM?J%?j6&Pq^Hu9q_tn#wk(%^1*is)Z7ujFZ&+U@=Ht>gE&{UxP_*A~SZsr32=QpSHjkO=2 zS810%@DX2qXjf@_(+;hDBQ9LNjOT;T@v}^yHbIN}NbQc}&-c%@AFzENmtG=owF>{a zeT~2EcW5Qt4xHP~^_puJ#{;K&sK(O;{!^PL-J^4qjt|+R0q#ZGW92*3q;{^;3@Kfo z9v)P!r(B<`iak9X9e$VXEmZI!ja%-P?N!UuTvPbpv-jAKV%ZylJ{x#9ZjG5O*{gTq zI>*22+RwUkzd`;6cpnA4Px$HR{+r@mBK}mr__?QdzL-CF7l`zY1MPEkg@VU_iOKJ>IcTJfCD zU4mr=QZ#q$HFOj!G-i|b9^ZV`P_nBR|Zc7w)Tz}>tbe!e)YM97yP5o zeYrcu8O>McwE^&JjQ+Nd*F-d#^TF%p_})=2+z-(aX^&{n=DNbK503t|vb==b zaGl4Sz5BD?tRUe|;M^aE+Mm5p5qKmXc<#>QksJKu!)u(Zgnn6ABg#|lKYiezeExxf zl~YUipQK;yzk=X5o6*o*#S+a|$D=~<7vJ1JU41S~^J^ZDN{?$gO%UUZwVsF@&l8+D zm-#eL$iQ`uJMZ&ba747X$C~EVj<n9h_C!}&Ip1)^9Zz|+ox^K$aSn~=lmz?Rs zk96=;D$cDz^9uPOd(?dlGr^yI@yogYwa;%B;+F&d;z?K5#F|(5m3c)0_+&>o-rB;C zM1RHa6;+&*{Kd{c5+e6nk#>T8!??WmJY4Rfc(hNlKP^?nF&!!I|bh>}~1! zEyu?Lxe31{=IE7nPx)Jn==Z_voZ4)VypL}lu5)=`?6bE>-p7~sA?Ev$1@r#t&-Rmk zUKi&5WzM$#g)#-eGug)X%5nh0OgLxdY z)T+H!n^A&u{pRNkZ5!?w8z;$ULvJq9`IV}L;w8KQ*Et?L4$Pe|=Wl8t?B{r_`pCUm zFUh9@=YDO}x{+@fBs>%P9pJTibHh%fglFJ7_nW7dZhgiCJRHyB`ymVTWP<ED+3sdZs~#rp_P`=w)2yh~^xd44{T zS6f-^@r=VvB8Lnak4!0ni>hay_3IO5HI1WxX$ySE0Yt( z>LlC&oa1-wL=&H0!ZUz#{kil?y$Q1YxyU~gym9-NzHF4_vvHm4uP(du36q590_Xa5 zYp$(Q0&uy0r6QjK@OQm&wOJzK#8D@{TAro{L|m$^dhV^H3}%Xy_-cJj1Ha*tl|Sr_v5*2Q3b(!{+(m5>w?Ah7&DT@ zbzU#XLq0E!T=0!Pz?PKoRey`Xe{y$IjlmzySN%{~ylYJie*odmm5t04<5+bT9I0|NFn3Xj21p z(T~qboWBKtf3%h@k@ItwDtP*f^S2Q2t^RnRf2}Mc%k4ML-!j@N`{yR~_1Csm#2e>t zcHldkJ{fdXMnyc=>o|YQ1wOHB>Th+-(erkhhjad>&#Ps=WUtolwWcV?phWfZDvG%2Ijw6kn03~ z&&Iv?@%$v&WL?_bPLHEZ|K~+|dH`u+r4v=T&M0wjtp5;j zS9PtCd%5=$W%b`t*+048ciESFKT%fyz;Avz*!ptsC(7y{_%#h5FNyVjg7vSr6Y1{) zsMmb(v%d@AUdKzjDn>s19&frq&6BP%%^NG&Gh>=w<2ttfanR!|H!8dN9q~t&);RjX z!fm;v+d$`c#M>_KwdlSzaqm*T6ZFUdz;Nb>!T0?+XGebIIXco`fUfHq{+;7QH}dya zzU_PVqv8C7LgYVIV|kh>JTAy3{dRgsWe2~r90acA;ExB!0jJOk?|ELuJMkglH+2|n zi;sclIuYe&WGTN4uJ_Wv2?o6M+r?|xHTr?= zRob<&-u=V}%|FCyr^b3O2L9ihS6>sWof_*s{U+tF=jJx+CGAwdq+VI?dc8_J%|$)f zz|VG?gL@qx8UK(k^2HC_H<0m!^7G<^^-qyU;>}Y-wL zCVGb;$J|-j&EK=O;-2LRUi7vhU+zUOi{X1d{&&>)B=pGdzXD&B9IZd)vfmIquW&iZ z1zI`M{(~3Q`+2^H@N55V~S>zYJLYdL!g`(vp8|CHwtK_c?{BbJQyvHa{%8JZK z|EK(xg_PgnaN%CpP5kFZzVJ)EXR$x%t>$%~q&K{YJYjmGzh|@^^&c9uQF!GNe$Tgx z&h~w%>t=obPm<|or60f3vA6Eu|8gEG{F&cH^S9~wMjfsEBn$X$NdMcE_&|~>K2m-$ z>~VrVV#%w+lQp^@bT{aY?tU$mXD`F$T%atb)NRV7hetzMC^F=>mVxuU7A-O+xn|-|?{8H`guaiGc1WmhT1bmiU1;&`)~#>?acz zv>6_kt`yYE4}pJS!OpkiHM;p0Ww#mh8+vYU!TGhcuK>P>#yGM9zk2hybF@?Urv-RB zaDR`oeWcqPKsmXfzp{MhO}fABpyz{L@1;T~+nu!EtUIIQz7ROkLG0!4i&!D&V5_4Y z^!h3Vp7Lv4+E+yR;TXBVvjR-3!?=m}j~FGN)g3)z^g|=`AXMd+oqx`x|{_ndRVR@7Vcss%7p{yvN0d%xW#P8>(EBDYMh zAmm@Ops9E30Q(RDiC*TeO5bo9k?Y)t^C?>BNmkI=POo+R{i7a#cF@i6ci*)GIZcT0 z`%tb6xGx(toKJsC`CNbFcZWOAy_4Y|;dk7o`ak+*$)WST=ois10J)UEame*!H2G!i zF9h7a^CN>CTZG@-Ejs=m9{p1(_XP^w3qC7w541o3DfgWUJv2qNTiSo^dppbaDGJ>V zJ{Qt~rrLw_{iq(u_kiAHV(R@oGcNoY@Shj-7XNNMfaV+V598en|L@#%-l5k|2zGm^(Cn|r>G8q(HFsBb-2S+I zsU9CzqSk+B)xrKmjDv5_`|Z^@wB@k>%f`pdx=PM({-=lKTK$m3PEoxaOpb=`H7YY-Hv=0?3i2db{{=HT%gmwtM^^%rrYNMo#WTvFC}zL(d_fO zm3>~|>O5YQ$=_ATG9{X`2Z9bg15AMrEy_78>s$1R*e%ZwTnFVi6$1Xxi!CcNJ_IY5 z#IXl*Ej^XLE^c$4(c5VN?aTpsLWh3CICjW9+c<71xe2Bsw96du+47*;G_Jldum7R(@nQ4z4<))=nD_LBm3T1ekSOQ(-h}7ef4#&AmlrM zTe*AuPOd|VeU!`c58BrJ#C1xc=YTH{>6zK}C#9f#nTO@{Q1i=N`T@9xU;3t+E3Vt8 z6n0m5Gw?y+3$9t2RLQFB;$M+(oadQ(D}Qtub>Gy=71!;{_F218Z<)Xc-hBS`vJM&r zNZjTkZcBL{0C@N}-h4{cAN%evht|0;cwUuAR}uD4yd8A*&4cg$vH5fVd-xObdqHR4 z`*v`pb6i}~0@BT=m3+3@dX{IaS8gBQ8}uYQ=!~!1tJhkm$5-ZU${(!XwTtJ~Vf{)w zN(Y_w}05d@y|@B-kItF~DgYyH9pJnJV2 z{3j25a!aiB3)YX`PNm-RSWmYr`!kV>9nwG9wfivd1=b%^j@2V4PM9)!0>7jq+>v%& zHb2dUoQCTfR=qxH{7|7wTxM=j^_GeKqI^%`J@eTk zW0RZ_SlJ)J^Zi*VaNI}mfY;d|IR>8ls?CsZy+iqB*1Va+QXFNXBmaneFXZx^TQ=}7 zl$&s-3Af`!OE1+wb6yt{`i%|;OQ#oOr)eZNoPB={RR|AiIdAQJ0TyEevCHgH|9{&23@rEvTkj*qhMmoT1k zfq$~$3zPVJ;X2+JPhQ}Uy?JeVWqWjeMC2RdsR;Pr>b};XN_gDR>re2;crxFq{Nd|f z^n0o`2Hp@)S-`jG_tdVm@VH@=Z;U4w@I_q`cULvUlgu|5PtkJ1>#C^7eDHI=5x~8U zm-$99^2L`j-tv4M*9})a^;ARhMAjK@R&iRE=TLqiKhM{Zzy0y2J}bk9<2>8Izu~`* zPqQASd?)0&kxsmS&t|^w2sgucj$^_TnLirjNxrNz+Q46c)Q>cXlsXAs{18IE+>0Is zJyn0hdCB;E*2Yg}v)2S^>Fapo`+Yy~HNM_fHP$%h>8SMaqMQ=o z3u`q>jWv$hpH}tgds3yA0m>gs2hV6D5CA2K{=r4KA`|6zH_ z#`?_arJlpurLH)i?4Tr-3f@?sPRMJ0>+VH77eOw;8|yO<_+M5nUu||0SuWpLpMKzf z+SmG6r5O4c>$3#-zs7VpUD;MqzOg)mafAgx=IY7x;$NCx0mCUX1ed4D!9e z*BJIzeL44H#OE0BMZkZSRdTp`W<`7^@D8NrY-R7yBRUMJVX25uH^|QdKGgZ>)|%-R z@kV=Hz%T8z{J5;`>-tN4njNZMnV%1Q7;2JuGCNc}GEPp{f5KGRCsaibQJ=S!oDsLC zJXA%ao9|Ngai4dgyXo#!jcx^<`%iZa>OCS&quW8}bJ=Tq2HaRxqq{)&!B3NJUS+GM z(LJDhF+LyMKfGJIM)!iw{i_{n-*u$AMh}3_`NhZM-)UV#qlZA}xV@vW!|ydUy7_Kp zKj$|ipL9G~OQTys=lrH#oi^XpE~m$5^;iDiIjH(!siPUQyM0(K`Q~EyKh6by?xR`O zZvHKY@BQCg(mkMaA5GVkf~Vg+bYdjv@m|ocm5lJ^$ep}q;^znL^1t*)-T~3&522V=L`9p^^O+9)3CL8$U%=ak!S-yAwJJXlUT04;Pt)MrSjPNyMwrAtC z&C_0$|E2t*fzjokIdcA&iJN!vce&$S;HUkMyfOWq7guyy2L3pYq5QVbG{0j+i?xw= zV-fp6Zz>Go>+~IUZhh}?wN~=K&>e%L%fGQ*&u{OpvUm>YaUnzbkM&-@e0%m66G%4? zjke!@e8SnRL(K{)-wJwj$p~M!ZL^%4vE%B0ux8r-s?4O1`IPaOnV7Ywqn};j=`#SP#Cuwxr&vOU2&%UKF!C%gA2Os;l zu5YF%CTesm=q{ws_51wqWKDhudV4^3f7`hzrMO(a2Xrs!*6t^dn>GJgK@WhwZBy0N zm9+W`A)o!{;MSFYudLBo|1QWmKgaZjUO(0m$}cQG@7dZuy?i_9?0;_xW-hIy=|}ki z$Zz~X;J98t9`Ji;UtnQ3-F`3V?7ssw>VIk0{6qO>@b4S8XQy6&A@I9Ek55kfTKB)% zsqAC_|F!>?yHd3Jv4YP2|NPYV7n(JC0P^j?-Mg^mhDw@#E|w4aiz_~Qx3caZ&^@5P z>HFDL1@$A(0RgmM&L_RVW&JsITq@+KXi@7=b^|^D{M?U*)K7z6IzE8@F%R?2Qs8%W z=$u*=cItRL@YKh8ukv5U$j|Pn<|k665&bd#5T6bFq-tN>%yFJvk^TgD4{)Qp_j&y) zU%5Qv{J0P}|Jcudu2Vos<@h|q{HzH0&yM}^T}EE?d`tArG2qSjDf_lPXdheGT@jxN zyaQ<#@WaPG_)@)`iuiPcd>8PC=FDGP-&qlFoG<1Bf9}8ge{A5Wh|e>~4*>toGyAV; zXsd|NG2lyqzjprStgACC;xmDFAhnKE{#o62-N(2+Szt$9um*+a;{5T8=k4xd-TgSY&5d0yeLYL<{(x=Bx3C>+b)UZrG$=#6sz@b8_Dik`>+JnXRoDO)ay`#i{FKl5&r(;MT${*g=K z(q)kE1AgScFV2Zqu(H1*F9-A>(uO5%*ChZUelyx5Bw0^%0B;(t{6iiK?rD?YWj!$q z`EoCQx5H0d|Ic_s*{$f|bywVH*wuPT-|7#)D(lds=R+R*<2iF4osFD|qpHo*_Q{nmns1 zp-N$*;-?;rvvW9FpTC0qj4{eTkKa4q%Qz4} z+mX+BdhOp(?F95&LU)1A^Yw9UZ#k>)U-E#?^V2W*wsq#YDdG2m&hx2T*Pc9`tjQ06 z?p~z&-`s=uwB-JwSoVg1Z`-uT#Bg(tx}@HX{uO|<=OXyQJXZN36W^Q2!o6Ns63-6g z3%|rc@mi%H-|KXq)31BdO}{)Z^hi63AxF-`NT;MD$O}1fBEnk^#LO`u-XR=pV#dZJmZ>p zKkyliXLL*s_wzZ9mB_5Rv}{Qnw^9;w$y0rF|jpZod_($DYsL1+6dzV6eR`uUw=(0P8xpK@CsH|9!x zo5m~sbKg?+G5xue9{Twm3+Q~VYyI5+{?_+9*+6GJta#qnk^5mpz7urDL$Q0mh5MO= z?gpLxM$!veC(MX9X}89BDFA+s`<@<^D#lCMc_8}B5B#s`xgS@q7%yf0An_%@Kb^O% zpi0GfNjAodWrFhG`~MwkXWR!N_0D*Sj=S*u3iaXuKgTpT?sdHMBl*aec#8N9^HlEl zh#z_Fz2uQNP4B1rf94e#_&HA{|HPfwyiRObexkc`H2=~q_eS>Ou>7ov%5K)1Z&E>z zxES+P%FhOV!)uEVvHucTa)~_|pywiO-@j^rJ`q0}?GZldk4s^f7kuOi;GQ-KUi?^$ ze8nIBKH_?1XE2~r?r&+ZdT>9sGr`Iw{R`)j#9MNdA3`mb?O?l8XoY9IP_6^`-1{c{ z!FEWz)LSO%jq_$V@Pd(g$sDTmG~J}$*H<0CJcIp(v=^g(EH{=t;`bormms}m>@8zy zhtMq#Df`%dpY3(#{e*Bkf<9$*w*QuOufLRlb{Xc6_XpMcWsY~No@w>#)VaOR3cvU> z_h;;LTA}(MuJ5&LKA~x%TTtbf;JL3W->u{pK)-i4_Pj3E`*1htL8M&&E7?7IMRHEL zZ23?8XWTbynxyPM+cJJginAi#xNkNS_>Je6h2P0U;A@aJ>e*WvRNd8B+B$}a}a-=JHL{#<2j59yPY{WB-tRQ+<#RcsHL zz)#;-^^aK3RmS$<1pY|fb|d7uO24GtvpwkTSlYc0@tOyIwtGMBb-c9uBIJvFiOc+D zYCc{Q1x{VL?%epNcgzC4?ES4LN8t{)?&e8EeTpBmrYOHyJFEEpDeLHNey2;~Gy`-O z__J~UZOO#Dl5HpyiQt2qRJ$%gnhX5+es{M@$*eeU@d3wi%M1KhH5Q&TTPos>@{53f zw&(L{G4{o$80DKER`!0eZtLH&FJAYr^ji+Yc#{RZm>Bj~qSvDA3Z@V?w=5UdqL;=^*{5D|IPg=LJzP!%v%>ef8%<#KcR;}XFs*O*H;g6KZMZD zQ)8=UV285?&5Z7!1aIumih%!OO#K?wEEVxa`Q}HJKbq~EY?I$< z*ZaR%^0R>d;?up6-)YzJGOii>OR-G)Q5X6t7x?p$3OziI#rw2-saLL7XFQ?WXWZ$* zkFhL~mt*Lciw*pI4j_N`x@pJC`QsB!hUb8{p4%}>bdgKSw@p`mVO;GWHljE#>>s(r zFI=ytd?)Z9e*4zeSkD0#(A`Mut*uwcv0eOTv`3W_UhxCohm<@)+|wq(%X}b&e7P4t z^LW!;9j?~P7QFb){+RNc3+b}g zSNZ7=q30u?e$8$$$fU2Q6@t$7wDF6cS);F~6;b}HDlY0SZ_tP9X|ePz1%7PyfZrpB zZA4LA;&-Eege3DYEBG=VSN3o{%#M5AcJaFt`NA)D`b(64T-Q6hXMPFo4C|TVY@y~~ zo@>>7pWkiTdDoY9=HS`m>1^9UZB+vgbLjyOsby=E1LCpufl^ z^7&rC0lh6Vl-+lAYv_sf-6o&mdCmd6$Q1jXzen5Ob*&vD^~r4#>1)aZWd^MtaaS%0`7hgrWt;9u)d zd19>dQpWlmv)hhe8fe3;TH8=!RO{> zM-Jb(pme)K=+YhwW5|(pV&)H=Rrf*mC$dgl0{o89b-!@EK;$rA*C!k|iKVSnTw0z~ z_BXoes>uWu(b3tcZKJ$3Hrx-VSJ9f5J?LQy* zzF+tI_j2pR{Qg!U@YDYI<(tc`6B8c-eod=7$1k@|Yz8jlDdm?5Ymbdh2|u?+`!D={ z2JOBGezyb9`r~>q{cFt6*YHvwTqpJ+fBCzw)YR)EfPC7Mv$4-Gu3t%gg+S-H)VuG; z4fS;%^GszA*NGd}>s*KHQ^Icry%68w>wZt*jJ{562c7XSqgl~xy&rLrf4YjRecl&( zu^$lm9?%&NHS_DA(btK+ptGMD+vly>vDS$hF9F~`nR@E?%dHdBUm@V%aXwM!a_hvz zXFRR^bv9x6PnTOKX1v&euQ~SVDY4dx883PqNk5W{ddmer`w=hhb-eT=e&kC$$-JiE zM&)nf_&r>q%lDT|&nP>x%?ihNqr@{6Jg;y$$rkWQp0roKFXlXt{p~An-PqbFL-fk% zAFY>5lPB+~tqIX|)_Y;vHO=DEl_oNN7|Sh$oGHEP+`;~jdP{$2ELZ8DXvzm)F;eH_K?RfuHkm@^5eI*jmmXpJ@AEv_D?%`{8KX zCFKVokA6D&&iQ=ZPn?HSehB!4hHqXn`bp$@K{wA*_Ir}1-$S2>AC30Vj~?)4fsZ`d zxTj5m7eD48U+%-@#(Oua{=SN2gs*z_ZtUNq$Ee%ne~B|6@QgF|XaCJPlcCENy!bua z;P;?bp2QF5?Ucv)^!4MXlzk^lWXUCV8|6v9v{REu`N@Km^I!+=b=|~n7xIN){9Sxh z)o~it&lLHN|5Uk*ubGX_tM&7HR`A)8&i>%;iTe6o0Oh+tuX{(y z

Mbyomi?&^@4k^^@Slx7_(hC!O%?R9KBxTl;k#Q0rCKOirLpwM2L8zWR)5TOn z}sHUB0BLaKh8`2Ez6lYaY%{j&Ja3x4`{%Tx6ebpNn@nNff3>oj)h z_T^*VMgOdSIIUBh#T2b)q05?xOcm@ zypZHp{1X2~Pb>RE^b>Hij?X&Gbx4Jd^z+Ha_UHkA-HCJc={Mp<{{Z9`0+(3pl{aG5 zAN^BhXxmnL|7Lzs*>8vc4mDdiMDM?R_}wDvv%2c>!}@3Yd3*BKS$hAT?N$DzexKe|FFW2{UVaF2S%0mQ zH@=^s(OG}ymy{o_*|DZ?tooz>tiY}RHm51qnN?}3{*3*v9eCfD&bw$A@saw2e!0L6 zdZSAX*0a!QKjU*~;J`#Z{z5)wKmC8`!$nW(>+{wXh(E~BDzZP#_49CiCTA~IbhbZp zp7O(zO07n+9YyI2Iac8Q`z~)8?Gk;97AbkzXm>?*r~VlS0Yc9OUkT#s%ghNs=>1tX z==n&~j{dez_eUY}X>a&zJMTrsJM=38?yhk!cC74F3P|~-$Y;D*osG9w(db^(N5)*` zhs}p-u1VGCA+)nB(0lJqcqmPyXCt5S_V3M|npM^49<$j zS4jswR(%x$=gTOrTpjZs6E49U> zLJ!YNT>P;t$Q8v`%>C5~)zsI;OF-v7(?^!1&gVL>@TbpL z_H#XY(;sU_CZj%L*^>$Ua$D7PDKrGBJTDmiCnR}Zut5(8`1!ox#=Y(vd0xmzzVJt$ zpKB_=6PGbZ-3wjHbsFf*_jOUYQca%Clx!+8luNnUURB@e3zT1&FYL$9kWLynYq^a%0Go^-Jc@s%^Ei-evvL2mGj0Key((SGYdP_J{Jl zO8~f=Iu(4u^)Kovc*Y~~#lUCUj?UzIn2zUu70OLtsQj@1r+sy~K1RIMOCj1zKIGbf z7mV0VJ9IxvKGy^D40z^ywfwMu%f9>WNB;14;=iX~B#w)aPdi6H{PPL=L+GWTvpxEL z`!SF93q9i%Whd7IgQL3rMSF#w1-kW!il?WhwYo}Q56lLg{r`2V8~m<+_dOSMjz4wI zF8EUa?t4DvKc?h=cI@TDd>pg(6-iv_mzjpl9vEBn1>)o8M z{PEM4LwjR=H;whK*Q>Pi9M%K)xgO%ey^fc5?nb`Ei^P+09n9FyjdaFYQDfydUB0w) zzoA^xi;-Vypo=_S($3RgReq4XNPBuwwetYd^p&dImfo|A_@0UUI==KJ#pi^)7HQ(C-DX(aUAEcM*TdHcp~nRmrG%IQ46;)a~r$0u3hHF^Q^ zi`S@q;@i#)t)$QU`JHV)aHF?c2Xb9U_jfVqte++utljwhqqI@uwb9?E#mc_FJ{xym zGVCH=>~lhHCU9T0=zJgrINg5E+qXB|JT6Y7m)Q?~_sc(+<28B#^N}vQyIrRQjb3Iy z=mV~*`#_>br~lm0vtf%~pX>hfY*OD}F}f&VGC4ypLO_g0Ab! z{=flz$E`^t(=wqb5*^R}AP4vnUH)xQ)lv~}jL!n#A6#6sezo+9cw>JM1b*4E&5s-4 zk@4BsABaThCoG5`(-P&MOr$~&_lxm%?LOS6UZ^I7@WqsCcGD(Kn&NUiJZbX7VX^y*-ZySEWJ$IzF93O~UViUX z{gL(030>sTcBa%bXY{1;W2Q_VJbKdPF%u^!p}M?`H( z?he;^*(LJ5kne{45b&p0zI7zl_m*tXoBC%gRrW6Yrl@+X?=4w?r#^Pzn^zvRI@b4= ze9(jVT;NmIHcg22y(Js))ZYty*ZAQ@vA(y&`5ezf6ajy9!B>-OnWOz9?Y$K90-nP# zzp3mMCrUr*e^1p5igr~9oNxZKhbntbQJ3J2?X`$7tzpea{ zzoK#HR8Mrg2;SIUvw)v+Vbrj++=_T(dvyUHx~{Z(RaXqWp}pno-v>qw0x~hLE#JO8Lz9YY=%YtIABS=|ti62UVr~Ov^ zPI#@n9@P>o5m?zD!RIto@`*3y?~1>?0 z*BvuzsrkbV-DW(%_b%iTyc_s3eIWl*pD!((uj_cH0dMsxeO`)tvooK6bi8+^>c_Kz z3qYS?&dEcK^Z1B=@SXnv^zeYMW0RTh#QJV3zw_?`z7Y62?Ok;%Td0XjMZU3qL%?rt zG4_`#=@s$Z7nue58OxNte|m1MBm0^3OX55WanA4j+kqEcczjCqr>k~Q+*8%d(Z#QB z;`kWWudE%E#osFBzriWHn(+CGWy*M$5BY^i&F%i!n-K07`hy*z(%f6q66-QDJg9i-bq=lPR*lltYK{jA+9 zpvSvFZ;ytzZehvakKg%UxF?RZpJWf{jK8d_lwWp!@JyC*pR?Fw2HuM_uWms>l4cLf zy8-2OcWmt6(>8V~_3^fkwzt+VZ9Cnx=4<{=LR`iN(e@truhQyD^J{+&{aGz zCqJxnGPs%Yvq8TR<=0tzZ2GaS6V?h{>Ngj3+8cnq6KbAc!u`vFl}qrY2LI%PzkS+~ z4-zdASlJ)(PZ96|;98&CKOi}Ve>y?G`c)Fmsps$hNQ8v>DIIVquWXM zbcps}o#YR@KkRS+2Iz6wA4dDHL2m0i2d#N2@|$yE`Ej|R(|@5QYfGNlogJY3e9&)3 z`FFiC{g+A`lUfR0{80!x`!`P=6)y+IKiWISx?6G<@bq^P?oa>PWqOQtx8w{1-u#iW z=b`oAv^K80iN8zX=Pcm;vHx=c_x8t0E4hzTY?Djy{GF4s{tx&wO}1Bw zwV$&>{|EfhO6|Uo{hazG@+6-#7MuGA^_K zL-j?($+(=0e#j1f&PQ@_uj6H0&O^Qk5I^&K_3RgWuRI>L&oH-P^!y@d;OF=1$-m^t zp&=|YEI%>d!2i&OJ5%TjDL;L=vO5!Lx7wS=mA|J6$F+f9c*X7#=-~jL>oc{#JqP#H zLGWU?2l;X@*J|Yg;y@&4?tcBY4;uK8m&*9@p+i4-sKoMJpz?gD<@hYfzO z9AmsSp6m7i-}c3X1kOd3bg?hI&(SciECgOKq94~Oso#ouXSZwmRXF!p{3Vo! zdC>N+Qg6}EZKQvq?Ba8Oi@oxheN%tm6gl#jGx3RI z9k+l#$>&q!HtVzFqHZ@OI22g)b)&ojq}D1*-ok0CpW%88L`y$Y_Wcj~&kw$NP1aoG zdkf+v9-N?;AnkhU??P>!lw?^Q9S?)fG_rDB7k;ikIlC&oRxCStA|9hxnaze&zdN(F3h3fr zuFJE(DFD7{@Vm3Ac6wH&dVR3J@dKZ}`{S``Srzfd{-y-@c?qYwRJB&b8~Yneq4Lv( z8M9hd%czJq_BRgTAK&s&yL5B(x|fWT>~HjOK*kLl+NT@*95;Np*YPrL1duNpMdIp! ziYLx*rglGfR2w&v%%3VdNMABO|1jq_VZWvn?@{M(+0R;m&%V9cCGMZ1^@8^U&+*v~ z{J0($RwWaNRL1E-!#JG_yg)?%{Kr*4%W;3$%&+(;9iayd`d6QPUD>*m#D!7+5b!7R z^R{t+7}XNIQGfF~<)0PzHawF=AX2F}qy9n?ySykT3;ZsmLYMiCTe}y0kzu?s55xEn zkr&=ifP1#zqGrc_jz?UJpMsFb_H=XgPdf2?Okx+mo0>aR$t?lC>w#u(CdY_(wh#W^ zPx^Z0hy4E8Z>3x&-t+HK@@>FB``WP@<{0r#d*j3*xFp_v&?^W0jQ0ZE>v)OxLgb4G z@ndO{iWlOH`(})E;gfoFU|ouQ%(o>gd6^rO{gN;HX-Wzb1s;@NQdY91iKxg~SKJeaR zuIC6n6LcTarO&xL>gQ~^&!!0Ve{X7XQk<<^Kc43=0snWEO#7nj-=yqk|MLFnTi({~ z4}vcfxHFkA+?Z@v@}++<#-9VYWz%o$&i#7|9eF+|n?EuBa)5v4pSWjY?c+1XUjgvj zhOT-w);>OC`~`uppZWWgSm*f}e|me3^hb;}MRY zbjc@t&mrx~xPROO{h8_2M9N0}MrU2yT4pq;aq%&n4F?DHjsY5uPQrud8IG*CO2S)F&{&U9Sxq}Ct z{Db-w#n4CgS2O>>+7)BtQGo2PPT#8RnfTJ`&#Z*ZvE}a>2U@>37+pS ziMIj2Yxunnaep!G5`5WvUf^<&j@dh~7WW$yFZGaxI4FgE1;Ep8+Cl#^pZlmw40z_7 zx0Tmt*uQ1_t1ZZ{)NO9mcapP^Pdn$oZ>vRrNPEu)o%7`drWQZZexc`r&i&PQ6}ysY zuh8>BH*Z&Q_vp?3TNB}Lp%;SAap#=-=Qwib_P-D4`>RVqXFosn!Q^My zKTCTu)_cZw<)0zbpZXwHzih1cEZ}EOeSc4^e%V;>F5m+vd-jO6znb-~*Q@l)LDXkH z_}PvExYzO0FBc?|hf-SC{7m-H+7rVc)3l=o;-2 z-pKPM@Fhs;$Ml`bUg|G+@uL;_axZ?$HT2Kk+N%Fm^zeBCyx(KI-qdx@(fDkks(SE1 z9^-ZAcdw4u-`{#cr=R*x{5(s0f14DbKA89YlhFPY--n7Hb89Mn^6}n11bpppzd9G| z{ZlUXBiO-b4k$mo^3&S)W4(W}?^E?`2VWNOBd5G-i}n7A^BBH|aRI-!#oJ$A?)_6f zzBiu_{Or;eAI18f2qbA><)mR^<0X39WV8q{&{)4OMlJp!)D-nbKFnY>bk3) z?Eh4)s`X#mNxTE{I=}ey{p=5Qd|AJMbzL{`8#k~0mi;5~5_kEAxbtcHhTB)74c~3! z_mXG-bx+woJc$dVewVXH+Nt?yaPxoN}!ECwL#|rd`TTelK}($Bt>q74a2*Cp;5;#Y^V&PH|R{U-sUJ--mGm z?>|G9`YJFyIR7TehFy0shZ-H(a~B+I=kqBJC^}`Fy@|;=2#C zA}saA87l;r>*#$DD;AD zDxdw*sDI`K^>q!(w|=es5&ziv3(1*EL*ch0zqq^7BmCBIcq-@;_gu&4eAos2zYn*u zrdeodxjZxI9;BsjR86i5oXE?%MU_K&g}}Wx@~#ucb0DH$2>vPpF7BI7t>rteaz*qr z)Q35!?40oWjiah7SlM5RFJpZuIfhRsN%|&sh-FBU2B^j-W3zMB(Cxx&(>4DFBs$< zwSw>4gzf{~a$NPRQV0C{HxWy{VL^`W!_m6_?#+whaivbsc7Zd!uR^VSfvFf_i%e)u#ux@{3d@{t5*eQMt(0|}( zd=}zfmm_`*B47C_!4xp~(Hd0q9-&LQr0a5|-1H*lkNj^Hp5EC^o zRDB1r--pjt&!=7UNMeql$}hoZn4|F?$ZOJi^1&o$IadA?Jm*)1!0~qs9-Wo)X>tra z&qL)wpAhx^=3uiFM@9L;FQVW7XZ)c2VP0|DYB|54+b{a0<2)kgXLjH}yZP5ca(=;x zFTi;^;&XvN)IYDdvZW%v*o}S!^JXvbZzlA4OwKPD&zf%67pDzYZo{Y;Cs-kBD9}KE_>Q%2d8=9ceb3u2&|A(&WHz-k~=Y!7n zT2l9wnn@bH5Oj`TtB+-OPuA&^R6kGz+=m^Sf0+V$xPHp!|JO1Jg(!7@nQ$Q#;)lN)13cqH7pZ$gl_c~ts z4L9<|mlB6&!#ucfW_f=l^-|$?DzL9(=HIW*=6qGJ7vt|>6r;R@9UffEahQ1N4~^vu zP5MJW_|kt;exY49+#Bu6M!xV%`{6zZ?tApj?Xynb=a3IP_pt?TJMj?hk^Y7A} zu%Gj<>eC;&+}%k@ z+tH1D4X{`BpX^HALXK!2j zqOQLOeC*E(*F1BpuD=U(FVa<+eGlvNaUbeGh%^A)mezl+y4-x6@e=}mX6M@;yxe@8 z@sm-k{PlZ{r&?ZaKF;{D13%~L!y97F#~D9*yODP0f?spN&vxd;y^fdu!;gFwcL}DT zq5t4~4RINt^{=XrN+%jTEqP!3_H5_MjUW3T=y8@q%1)kp+kSo3OV!$~EhOCrI?pkU zetG7mp8MO?2R+^iI@hyXcWIrs?0ZXOh7pdt_|Wre9B27omfU{tjXz{ur2GOy`L{k- z^8Kr?c_N>@3-ibM4dssaY#&=$b3(rT$?*Ly8(r?@TdN=zu z;ddGMpKyQMU+2#QpATt|LA9Rd{zc(0tgOZdmf!38dy;hiAoxmGZ@tg?#Xa7a{t;d4={)`jqA$~KKD>U(&6?{2J+3pK)Px}Nfek(-2;;*<*kMrur zO_uP;qd+5<%rk5T`%5)>;kZgHyj|JP?>yeN;cP?li``tW;J(1imls|yKC1lULRxLr z_FeRk#Bo0I`5b=W>Q7E_eiDgu1O1hCo0C~LLN5ZH_0+}l*VkMRkEL%Z@a}G3{=@YE z+9&m7^pDUY^#s0*W6B=ZlO6ZQdU7IP@oVRq4k-VYELQ0s57u~;{-7RGPx*#=D$wLf zoU$G8eF*Izxug5kSaHhrnG(pcesXGtv0Sm=ST5}kf-mE^!G7FVupjxtFZIOpOhx$p z>F$SKXq;dXYJ{HX#Xerno7x@R&`_T@`6&^?oOgudpzOKX z6jJ*0JX7{}pS0!tLunHkFUsbf1(0h2-&J=fPPp88rc!)I!2$e^f`Z*i;pY_n5`B#4 z3*5jT$r_ZF9DYvGFTr!&&xZHqKH!)A^{6++@SGy?Q;7KCJhd2jksGd$#DbA3{^;+w z_BIJ>{*EtNs@5gA=2f}=v>*L7T1GxcCH2YkOsvmWb~oLg5E<>2{~RZjpL3A%JX8FT z4R0qpb?YMdvVMjB%L8Bbb9<-8I?t2|x*zGP((7vI=b1{7&v@wm>n)|R&NF!yC_g;7 zaBR%;OqnN@9gT*bni=m>dW-#xN1kU|vhacRaT=ZHnR3AY`u^|cCTR3Ld`O+`)xr*nR(tlNUK0o>0 z^RdqNq(e?7aJHwM+qfPe{-7Vs3za`VZv4}zIMlPyc|Oby{_hrVeN*=*?d5aHxlQLr z==S=-M|&%^O#M=~w*d5Fq)Ypyo{MEK&oh}$DSJl@Zv9Ctd!3MD0nUDLbD@5o$$@;< zU)t=v`>SND_z?ecosRuY4)BfoPK^5Q>hF1X|J|v$bI2Dp8L^C;fH+S zZR7qaiMc=glxlCm3F>(u0Q_&=b}i(4e_g(3x55=cekt&Cs#M(*YkxS$9S?pF%=(+M zdt$XEHyF?P$hcEv7`t+)84*guf%^L$or=0@2_2n|1!=hf7G~d(EqN) ze|F$~C+psJCH~6=e&Oe{0$1WcFZIc3d{r#}1=FJaR|Ne3SK_~X;CFue)RZgnUjXuVB;U;UlEAgKT_$ePRdoY&&(i5Zomk+%7Po7T$xQ~+zT$1mB zogo9>j`}s7FOOrvo7oNw`2qBgnOeS_@9|(9DXy;O5iFl6=QVsDw`=^=Gd#aZaccQ8 zKjH7eL z_hCQ9hfb^cQ)Iz8jJdn}`X2dDpBO24@k252+;_@#sn5F{J<2)~tXxulMs{?ZnM%v! zL+s=^7s}&vnEQ>fX-0WsX9aoTa%BFS3AqlW{63=__qwde{8!UM^t4|ettabQ?2vMe zbjg=;iy+5(O0A>jUa#u4^#3R~{X)6@5|{oB3eWFTlzhM3&iWNP-|IQRm)fky{fSa| z_!4>!^0}_pz}z>feBCa5zRTeMJgt1O%Scyp6HGqfGO&IY)c7QBLfXCf&p038JYVF= zx^l)vWw$>;`I$DdUYH7=SGb(yEbvL5l#^FAx}Lb7OXyOL8+e-mNBK+z&r8ZFh$^T2 z924WR#)l_{lUMY}HuyDU;O99e@;`BG&yI5b@V+XXyJlYX^Lv+5AE{US-^yPcw`}fR zQ{wR6L)s0`F;Tt?`0=A_Rah5~#1ZHoq~A7M`w{Cv;=pK+=pylL2EGs}d5UmP{RJ=W zss#CRFXiU1SN#d!2mLv|iJv^;$HH!g`ur!lefTyi{`7lQzx~|OfgAZgTIAb6&jH{5 z@0UKp@l@z}$hYA8PHiXtcq5He^R?nhdy@t0#_`NM|#EC%kCHl`D?{9yszbV=!5{KVFM zmEaHYuLb^P`^W^Y^OBY+vAz>muujD(@ebg7pMI+o=S1|Ev}+zv`_ktTtols0-o~udx6yN_{6lJreBiRQ2sC1?ij=J z#cxLWN^W>RF8BgSLt43EKgFBkls&}f8}#(L%KJAd$4D2x$b1HJ+}K~ve%FC~WBs_a za>H?zV%(nkLY8EJQvdHedZ40xFhmP;BU&y2d?%HiHj>?UPXz5x5GaAs}T4N zMSWi6Z^aNFi917m3r*tA3OOP0Gu|_jV#j+X@`YdQ3RY5f^IS}5_=RqIJ@EM;2YlUA z@*dXvxjf|a`CwJ;&zrHIllD|(XfHmke6h<&S9*o#`@r$}phV-7e$bq(>=S(0pJm@U z;(HXLdX*aV%F^UX`|#bS+85i$H*@UYN?CG6>KorRxw7)Y`voE2i}dXI ziznHxr5=iqPd_%z$+zf!E;Z1{6n|b&?&t7%{gmkTke}pD*VY#*yqC=a{`1E1PZ;A} z>c!|EWp{Xg8}!HqKV!v%d)?PEt`{I*_{C1!_t=+?^CZc|i5dESr~(rmfA7o(`jpkP{$qcj$1USE2wcaezYaI{ z10v4>dI{23@0^e@jdF{h)^+XXm1MtvE&rJw0CW(T-*N8=Ys2 z3Efm#*=2_Oxx<=l)!T^$bPLMK@4TjOx&7hz1D)mH`MPZkmG6Wf7i^w$Trb~k z;9oOp%`JNQ1)wwTKAbRBTQ3RQ4|;HbDkrH`=#d&_^%M3l=*37cE$*LIQ>Vjkv~NiZ zf0AyWr3(51_-EQ4{}A0i8|buu+;JMZ2stH4)9asZt=mU`2GKvJzO>xO=iEsB zRz>?rQ+DP~`SBV4eu~hYpi__QQ(M22it$J29`N}f-#PXh5BqbW7l5DplDFK@ZJb`d zA9RijH=b-UP%qzJs^W+9-bXi2u9sv{H7xQ?)s+66Cme2n`>te-&hg3u+=pL(-cMgI z3jL|ZLmTLeN8i4b^H`Bzx>oi7PS9^`ILyTL1fjc;&w2Oo(Z0=e~56-DwGW6#H3-YPoGmd}%)BQ)k+kl%m z?C?I_e}0tf1l=@#a`#k}FY%uX|8U;!25wB>!Bf%<^L+7FCh!Ho{jj|E)T&xM1xKp- z2!cN7*zG=k4?*~IF@Lc^uSb8bwKrCMrB_$}SbStC$ z^^smf`C)g<%4059ADO_t+-8bfua6ScgA??$J_`!@-3h4=_AhSG>yB&iQgy993y|-t zrTUjZ-oxW-Xmmg5>>n;pSn;a-{-InVpW|cJd=-h3SIZsm2rsA!*xw69s+&#Db`=mZ! z%0a%vs&M0`U%f$}51Fo4`P6sslU@2y-&p;n5AtsAQ|BYj>vVncKo25qTj!4%oG*xf z+_e8HW&fd8N7v}}Zvou``koezcSglO^4*zA@BAkZJN5YYBmSJgb=dD|UQ27APSD+; zH@ha|VALBc<|HU*tzKTI-d{?bErKWBl7!@;|libl)c+tI9cy<@ofR_*S(n!>GADAKI8kJ zT|Zf4#W(eJ9_wwQzOmvv5AvG5x1>(2_|5^{hxF~g_72eF+e!ODKeF7tUax->=%%{L z?(XS_KGx&gf_%nzV0FLy_4qD8eA$3Yo%vV(Ra*QOV|;Rg?rqxgxjGu%jeJWz)qXtx zKJ`Y1MlZ(vwg9*~1yB83SEIW@_k-T@c>bUDGq#f zUmnte$v>>;*+roj;Cajk`r^ZV##l7@PCQQrL67&`-Q-%0UV?mIN9B+01CI@Eq|r^_ zPp_~1aP5G4OB!qRVyuH?f_~tIn-ZF6bO-V&KQM0Mp{5$$4gMV9{{H#pZOuTJbwcBM zl8|Jb$qBwZ%10`6S-%Zv_Yptgcar!W{j_Z_K9yh*bYz@L^mbRzMLg#+DtrC_?VL+e zMgwI(_t9Q`=DA}1Tu~P2e9wK}dhq6WyOJM{tMYY4;CQa6cxUrhE_be|6n5l-Z|--d zOP4!W6r7{%@B(kQzIGwWs`TJr(Z_hMs0jE|pS-#Da_5Tp-F|aJ<&Q5bCq(u)GG?U= zsULoqpYOS{fLHYR#LVlW{XN2Q$G4il48@?9nT#*O#jH{I&n$P+7oPMsz zj(o;L`x(AJVx24EclrA}s`rV5UJ|c72jhVp+qYj%)6c;$9(kU|S9gOa*14hp_zNDG z*(SlIOcwbeSyOj8m zJJvZHo-1+z_v)wFkHtD?3;b!@54B^RD`J16_e1jj(uH>F1wYr?i*T>w<$Y2K@};GO z+ey6bXVnk!9YVEj6T9bBTi;IT(vM~~Qg(Cv=6=5I*`+RBwvrd#|7UnV;sC#*ho9d* zRpT(_Tz6=|Hy?iJ5+>rmq{J8tm5;s=l%e{<$?o8!h;<(RI(c{a$vvK^zT0aS9>_@$}T>tj{k?%T({TSzgJbq{6 zownaSUfQ?w5%9-(LFacidJKBuyV?Ugo}>H#=v;e$;o9tnHzXZu4SEvSLD`>mdj0#8 zaoRjN@S4)!+*H{+G`Qh*{k^3X`9)Yi9KH5&r(Vx?&}|n~Jb#riYK#8f(gk`bNzvO4 zTv({Db9)T*PPYYLfR*n|7hD$zK~VmyjGUg0=Q z_G)sZ|Kj=Vx&XOLZn^o$mlq;6E%f}LS|9Gcs=-$xJNNYHYif0UXtKa14%3?}`x%E% zv~007r+5Byq-TQ8I813X>!w9Fwdw_WyaROVdw=DR-uq(5;&nog%tJwE|LOil=`;R+ zrQK+&VC52g3H<{9=7E1`+nd_PD_GfI@pDm!X#e?v7f{%~#8S|?4`c5Bf6Dgx$-FRd ztLn$N4}ex+u)L&ntMXSS(p{nTL#UU~oyh07-Kfo-c?lLJA#CpjKKn4` zv(l{-Cynku`rc8aC$;JNz~~7hA8FHdt5vqBf`p#8NAYKZK4ast zq5As11NqrMD%|FG>h|LLy6{`Up95Tt{=t9Jbot1qzn&O*U8Aa?OZ`}0QuXUW>H~gM z@7brgE~T`M)OV5_b_Ria`C{Lh>5%vT)BpEQo;-T;#Mcj12O z&r9zIEXx16pg-L6!*j9xp9lKf*}FQ&^1l!CX5%Ui)BPVrKK(!Y|1oym@l93lJ5AFh zZ7GCZreTOdh7lQMh+zno8Kz|i5e%~804g(xV3c8)7Ey?xSOp>MvLwig0vd2onFT?D zfJ9KJi1^E!^StfJO@4m9_m7_DKF|A}_kGX2=bn4-5L3^1@ehGFG+BUy)jc8ZwC^16LK`11!(S<2(8V1qwd@Od6u2>z2RD^8_xRX(Vn^(yAIrUu3J zpX}%FjkA5u!Qa0i*%$NOhHS`hRrj74$G({FM&y9+zx~M^rF~THO8dxuvOA0AkQO2( zJY3FdL&Io4TzFre3j61GK3U>{JTLNf67v}gRzdBD@8|q)`Gwzi2K|P| zL|kUSwRVjb3aOkeIM4pox_|R&o}UxW``S6bMTcD*EBXF8vP2MPq+j><{EvthwOZMqD~5ZaLuFdx-t_Z+5+NMq@6<`MzET-h1>@ zxjseD?UOv;FU^OZ3-4QcX)ML^S&-xREcD2~txB*K?K^1}gIo3NAr5?>D< z&%^V;FL&l-f)4r0{389cMLP+Cud2S_zTU!2k&^z*Hw2HrgPYz+#Ai}yL>qdav3yYc z^Wa}5ct_iwcqj!t!uh^!Ht;piTY9ESxWBLHSMoZF{yi;tue@BZ^B`w`R`9-ZE_{#Y z+@#-!{f7DA_4;ebN8FzfUWoH1mGHyX;D`BgyJq{+pAfjaZqIIf|B2+e{;+(xt}{1s zU5?<8%jqrbn>_Q?ZgT$F!1=vE?JJF{E9cMkI|sZG$s3$<{uwx*hcsKDf_8+_uBKl-g=o{$Z{&i(k|$5HhKeD=5dqN?ZE->`fF z_cy*RLXUTOpT|eO)h-wMHTovPAI|@oXY0)=wl6$y2hRP`;&pjZ{ZS@xuJ0|Ybek{L zca0IxJ@U9@Oqx(A>(54i!u`!J=^rgs+XRFB&xL;OPj-KJe?y{#bARFo?~9SwrX)$Y z3+IDKAF6ujAMQsY@og&n&ww4@eO+an4)Woc{KaDdr+lBH-RSV;z{p`kN2`htiZ{nG z6M9Y8&vdUd@580UB7M9^mQ!B0alAav(SG=_kx>*VRu8>^e+f@2KtG<3a&UaP^;vmb z@QwM5+hx-YwIYW%=9A_)|wtC)yT%TlrO|ZiO-oMNCcS*JhMmR?Q z5%=O67q+V??mp;wWyyvX7y6IfPnyEGCW!N4osna}^$SPwZzS&e=E84|OW*ScbL6;~ zfOA~#=@K|c7OU+~;60lhNc)l`&YF7na05b>E%e&4t>)EAkroF8O> zpJZBjucU>UA|-qHJ$u}r+QCjv#vA4E!^s$7*D>rgMq zoh|e`&+ObZ(UX3ijQa+vvV*bPS zuAh2nsz&mg+Y66-x)tXSCKy$bgXEpi>p}Wm;M}z&r@$#LHk{{j^Wk^Lv-kJMi%UB2 z0;C`BX!&UJ|Kc||lylgwBEQW~3cpwNZ`61E=XXyMPIhJCJl8k&^SvtH+|x+9pfAY) zel}9`#ChFQz$1Oiel-`oHS?#IPPLJi;)D3g{=pA^LP~942}S!$yRuk0U8twkILo!HT}q&1eW>>skguV3Qd;iW9GeC{83KIH=c7tcdYx!toA)e}G3 zcOH0yn-2M`v{^6+4`O~81pdPG8HO?v&hyK3%!6~@_o(Ihw&^M1Umoz`4Hhhr=i5$P zNAdNBKdnk7o-0uPcF1!*NNYW7LXx4#K6Pd@(e9tUa&~{X{i%+Bl$bYn*|x~Ho2b6! zLZ0tSYRYP?QExVNpakFUo%H=kCL`vk&0?F7#KTfgtxWUDQtUFgq3+<0EoVMv-; zp0~IxBEFXPLeIA6R=v;jmT-O3as9W0my6UnDf0=9C6Z0iAF7|q`sN4!YLj{Ul2Gm} zK=x+>FGO0UT)VnjsebUhjQxKwd(9SvG7`VcHmDzX&qCh^V~?pNdB!cam&xMqBvXP^_EoZ882moh0uMit9OEk9fC3mm9J_*$VmFU#`rO+Z)#x z9v43SuI8(1qbhPl;stq*M}^AQKS~5n^+k_(nULm#@3U20&h1WU6a86C{|Em5@20=6 zWg=3_KL@y}oruHbIgNYB{Xr(L#~?nxJ^FK3**_ETY{=jE@oZCBJ_qNyJ$gTF+JdjS zDF6HlVqJvax6wT1?lN8nj^L0lME*NJt@>37$$ow=wGg}qu4@nTH5keBa|Mjo{q=OR zjGMZPcFOvv4*5(Y+n3c|#D(#1+SPxVuN_H0&$qI{(=xWa7W&ilOm>k4mX!~8gil4?ee`UKewEN^M>vspRXp4F1o)*@;Q*t125&5t?A{Y_MMKn<^$jITgsa9z-fHs z{xOgH3Gg%r$Cr(KTn1c9D8DT5(lbRo9$u0EbwzL@?FHv~e4jII+~RbrAQ0}$j~);D zJl3d{JRZ0d@>Q~1(MeW{8Cfso>n4qhgBU!GfPs|p^)BOB-0-gj=F zc2@%~=V!zMnz3Ggqv;+M#FIYney2QvPmSzq5Xw zw{=xnzYB7?NC(thIZiHr?k`#YJ6n%EBkSjWg5_TR%?#v;NOtShZBDe;U6{)PG+89ic8cl}nN0v z8CGJ!0eSxI2hR6HUTD~69$&jh${#qF&xf9>kIMerf$O`7I6NJ^a5-5jAC9jHyzz_o z?3UxN$9eAWL%W=%-x@=Q z==iq&?j^4r-yrn!{j0)_$kL?>3f5^FzmT&v~o>WQR#PI<>`D|Wt2?_T@uOE2ct+Ma&I$fmv zai06P*GDz{p0Cph&xE|bn~1}&hYe4blJx7j{sVWE8vc3>3D3lN?$4V18dz2nxZIy* z;5x?+ekDu$r)#0#x;Fc|GCN#W(NC z^M7t{j89up{&yMAgI*KfpU`N|fFI=fM?P?#Ki&9wzfGQ>@_QF@a9w_4^Z5$$^+~!_ z_{Z(pwEjp)&OZY<-)}hB`;jJ5`D4D2iFwk7N>^9Q^EdV{8+x8LO^Tks;rfE*Grtct zmF>%e9M8Xo%<@sY4&U5^J-G1~ldH$P)`5WhN?9iyctUsIeBHes7$d4UH>KDh4^Y4HCYBM>$ z`Hzez^vg3Y*?zu0;5d9b@cA!f`!afpxbSoH*~Z1S<@~dNrz4*k zzd9z$`DX*?_)L6XTUE}VuMfEVCjB;JpIm-<3VDxp_a)iBeBfLU%G_d-8aj(M!Z93u)@`DBmHN} zV1sOb4$gCYo~T{>H`)GRUojr?{(}46@?A+%|B?@Rw(qeX?>^vl4C;Rhf%AO&$m+ot zl$l>fll z|4qHU-^u=S{mg*=Wrl-G<@n}9-eeH^r_@irDd%4ZJPY#MJ6Cnc`KR|0{&W9Xzrxgu za{hsdLNC{oBac>GBJ0nByf0hu_NCXaF3V>C&qg}%DHos<@rh; zi{l@;n-%I@BbkCl=1g~Uu8_n z+uWWxKiZ$FEN{YSzq<-{_#n??bqK$?ZzVqMch?UPe$j98!IsWvCt- z`ipYpbD0Wx{=NXq4+(9Yz+9?_%J+k|7&g;NdDB7p=RzOHspD#G!vwTTiW7fdfc5*q ze{t2D^SJ&AZ9<<5co1pm?x_@x3B^(A56MQJ8v{RmpokC4WZ*aZM0|>)73b+U#mT0K zlm3vne?&NazcpVQ9Y^-}{jKX4%l`6rhPhpOkvOoGk z!at=yMw}P&iMn8cxDTU0BJ9p=FY3uVJ^Y#ko-h$Pe1ywMr&sW8(AWOsx)s$5ex&^@ z7vryYw9xCEpYfC~B=iyPgS>l;z?c2=##KFV%Fk0poacVB0Q{o~jh{;{5PJA8@tq33 zYOshyFVp<;DFJ4Rl=wFA`8f+S_?^=%Po(-{`4;fG+-%^N|6s_i65d$8|G20h%y)yo zuHC|hX`WbqF8J)P5Bx)G8XPF;j^+C*N5>}w{_11BDwJ}@@;wT^afpb|c_SXsi4D-7$ma)e2EegID{JeHoA1-T&@jaRz(|*FwC8NJ7Y%A;zfKNK9-&MUJ+HFAxf&ZYM{1CsFBb;B+zAJ9u z1(QU5w0wPTNTP);6DhSv<4_SN3(~~0&Bkali*X0e^Zw1Js*SxD{&+&<2+OPejYNM^ zzDC(l ziSRL^MB91QN?mGA|C4@I3lRq+-n*LE`@%1!x}9#vxcNEMg9H(`H($1o+vIH!QAhGt z;CaAJ+jKww`en*6$g3T|*}v)Ot%LprJ-%T5Zs6=+xi^-Znx5?R5940o?4PCE(Y&t~ z?B2-w1HeC~6XD~dwoSgC@xrrt^gr3>9u@6hsOc+Pr}--y88-}z_Ag^bzdiF$ovhEe z894iw_-~!j`cC({09RXqvwwQmyXkZ4mbu3A4&dzHV~;m)JhI!6C5*d)vw!b?cD1gn z?}NxxCv3mk3;Yuj2p@aKCO=X2+}oGvfAY_(@bAxB2@fqi_+#YKgYXdK?I@ob>Y4l2 zsP+$JdBgL*wyw0j@R-7yh$_AG4l#v;M?y8ngciA%%a>I7XCzc}bdqxa6M~^6cNA z`$sO=HhuC!#sk3Fzt{UTUVGv2-N;rnif;%w`&X^sn$#AJPI3KBFpLoXvwtgI8~jqQ z9~TtmZwAi(E&Qa<>2=yCUqk+CEAY?hMEDr=%Dm=pymE3I{U6RhDfp4-H-aZbKU!*E zu&T~WsKDKj=Xu|@DSLILC1 z@7rDC_&h(g7%%ECH$ZEttrboUnYr>A`bqKR{wC4^h0is$-W=J^_2VYSxxH?t6XD}A z$FzZqe}7Pu{wH~^?_23a_-LgzxEEP-Bh`a&t}ojKta`=JJ8jMH8QdQg#d`(H*J)9hLa_W;ku{hh9QO?91w`+)O(yZw_N zwAM>_0dT(WRes<4Q^^vp8Y%qe@p#9#zxU^PF2%wBD#=@bbA9dl;|rBb z0H^v|!1ZgAh>s2YR^RUkr1?ZS@L%Hl6nrQ64XUKoFX?5bNQv(OpXZle@MnDaYhEc& zEZ+$}&o2wWuhOaBL4!M%Z&UCMFN%0=(XO3U+8N8YDD1a@|INqm-zwvX=11ZSz5~2b z>YTx4(f-Ik2ih&q=RM$EQ9re*T%=bo)=7Lf`ZwnLz*iTxx>nv*%%%T`@5Ok)@e6_P z$uF_6LUt@afbo;#XB;KsvGPI5P8IF3{1E0N%(sGn;_tiH(z9au2JqQ_C-`k2N`1Rh zW;CDT=f-@_3tq2?S2e}*mGgHq z_`TQu)u38>EMGZ)w}D?``HZ{O_0fE~Zs+-Xf&@j@bKtid@`=EG_$~8k9U>p+i5B)# zm-QjqBidya_U)eRb@!BV{ebux3V!++5tn;Ub^4C;W)q2@uHa{aU#aiv4f$JpBRp%B z=;t3&Eqsx5dl&uXPWz-sN8kzOvBGbjAH2}1!sWV`MTZxbPp|^#`N4(_^Hx-wJTbDg zPWm0dIsbDXS1LQ^*0wsFf5v(d2hQK$sq^F(+V+v@Jn8o;^1pfE*|RUc{db7%3n=nG zIlao5h6SD8X8j>W{&y0mx9@zYedN|ySbq|Kzm5C*C1po1N-&bN7*BcMu6dk@L%*7b zvem{2Oz}&y;=BjnfqP|t+VVsR=lkUj@TwnryS7HcO<#z45syb(pETQ7#`I?>AkYawowm@*|wfCjhx`1~+M| zmhceHbNQGzt41eEIG2y%CE=I1qH!tj(~;wA2F~%FQ6_g2?{^Z`i19@kFDv94zOb>M z*22tU`;D)O>whPBBO85FO9!6pKhJ0G^?Ig%f`k|O5BX;6{=TM`@DR=ikXGBBJT_6n zi~N5X{?A|7MI+%HKaTH(>kn^~)-!VyP0zNx!EqHTOXZWTHdD@ze*2#5^e*|_Pl+$(U++b?gY;5`R>o9>y`j6+sp0Q z1Ad(qzg0{#tD+8>&+XX_JUnixbEMzlawvMQ8}}LQMyH-#^;i2}iBIj)4?f@j z;Q7=4_q{r!qMr#y=cn-~zUTN=sox@N0LZUsUGRU)FZ{lX@gh!HNS9UAOy_w9)iW2) zb3L)InwFl3fD)byoZnA7)l?#=k#Ik7exK`ClTUU{0#5aUpC4s=gWzBPw#hi&7ec<# zLGvzUeCRyQyV4=2pCJ6<@3v>)cLEV{MDG9KJe{I)4_Ko6cOFLwr+JPWeEuGI5&_|Z z^>QlCioZ0^@k;qneQ@s*`S7}}X`%T2MqzJLy!$eIpON{6&^P+n_Djn9GNixIBlNLe z(?k)EUV|RwBr4{yI?My zkv?U4>?r#|cp=Vnzcc&cS@#n$zn5{oF5h!lUpo=kLt$K=fmugcCAar@j^E~K$UmoD)OOwoKd_~TQIYm>~e ze8(e#pMG78qdxH0Z`E(r8e{qC;qR)`ca1YAARq86=bRX+GsN<9Ye(~quL=7fE|YUy zANE^5$o_Oa^uk{&`1xaguqB6Nw&=&QkiQc==RzT$+xzEhDY1MluNQKE=Y`yJ$+qRG z1u^=yynf330`Qmbuv>WDf~CUtYrR;HbLAz61QFM=v~6%EOk3l&!##fDrCm;mGLV8fA5GE%_?R@^C^Dmh@WAKh|Azcy20t-k$=j5)&kym;}=IN zp+8}*#8>uXHt;*2`7TsBotYvfzOtWngTLg&^GQ|o(R>=WxSy3HGg~tiw3ZQW1N=cOvzJzdg18ZAI839k*`LT z3AsX~95>T65g%pTEI3c{G)~x>iRX;dVBAX|?U{9O*IxznGqS!DM^AYC&^U2^er84^ zo+pLRC+6Y2dfv1(JU&uAEf^r)N5k`{KPPD`@O3xk!*a5{VL44fHxYmRbm33A!yT&1 zdW|^G*IOkM((cIL!LR`5`Tv@Awa2K@?#M11a2{vdRU7_oBJglI>G(YdLHOkaKXFgS zgm~Y*FfIYnIRxO2+s z!WBp6Q@e1YU3kDZgU{uwpBx=u<$0&Xr}D^uPK?_*IDhKUYcI*=;l+9OXJy4DnLMAP zcn5&<_;%v#zy|WXCj>krL&Wh^^23dIzDDwf8Ny#)2O7|3_Vb#s-*gae2F~?i-uk`A zr2F?tR^VJ87A(KCL5uPxc?WQ=50>*=-_uFB8#veF%f7r(df?QqmG#97e!~+>UP@N< z-^5qemjL)Z%wt!in4-&*_{#dCdR@e$)t!gGOpUECMg23^7c=;6?hmY5LLaR^(%u#Q zD8-ffXB*1J26^sh-1sfmJL;cvaUSKOcC-}rrVpJ6A8BXW_4(M^W)b~Q?H~xg`KDN( z;Pr>J8Z-K79mFa=i0`;4c<$>W)z1`h=zMt2dY!G9OaBo+&;s+#wW7Xffd9*W(-D5o zjire11)uAw9emx6Ur+J+g3Nbc5Oy#>2mD^oEGfrUow*J*UpOM6UZ3<(>sTaj0E*o`k+!5x@C2 z2h34Bg$BZN!RPCdoOKCn5+&RZobMCfum8znjf4k*^Sa>|8yYrAl5qVjVL!L)b$dT7 zrIm0KaBkP{udMNfPQo*RbGz-4vajH?S;3;&+cs3M2ug^qWhs4^{5KgmDqIME-m zeScm_uO<1Xc0MKKJ40TRd$07p7i!)iWnp=>%_8uwz>g$7{aUH1mm~L~!{w_D!aidq z@!SZ1kEwIThwp2gq^0;Ez90Ntr25$+KCf-Bxt8O`62x~Y_!;1T7btas9U?W1*%@q3Y2AMus#H4pq>k3XoGYGY=xer0iVhlv%&^K%=_r+zx1Xs?7(J9eQR>0QGA45WmI`(?FN`c37W z_du*?_P5cm(ZeCkVHKa=@<|5BeU=J&?8L>y}D9^}v} z#yg5v2yx_fA1nBzlj2kOZ*+YA9M`J1Jb(0n&vB}>wvm(Pk0hU^678PjyRH6#H~4-K z;RTTA`Nr+UmkwzVU&4KC&)dR}vkUx75qi?5EPdoHZ!PA&j7M&4<3=Tygz1e8h%3I^fh!@_?IH zi})1cx3}ThU3#0)!+(jdykDL^SHxxV)X>3XYxF#i_{#g`nc!z_JCUDaiRCNrmuG`t z+~oO!d>9={AR=N2i?gMo(r7kH_saW&gOBDT z{_uO^6Xp0lpo9n69+$A=vCL$12}!?xzVMIxnbUv16-<+G6L9WFPISKUeMt$=1kU}y zQ*FvRN)_X3^H!1X>7>HQdtV+Id-Izkhszf2>vTb$_Z1xN`>FNm+btp*!uBWR0_S}N z+22jr?3kZfwC~Ulyb=XGeDr;9;@W3VUE_V5YU{S>{MSq^Jz#&Cqg{zh`t|P!|2h8) zZw#*gbgxsqk1xRlob&HjYWRMqdhD~1S7!p}XZW`K*z;oV9anlVZr&c9f4?z%EPKa) zev0#VDe`~&kH>ux>Rz*IJ=X6B9@z*RKDlUp@`;7-PyHHrQV{K& z_wl{3Y`s0vL#U{qdbjYO>)*#m&6_ly2pp-u{C-3ec*md4UzQ}{te^J*)_ktBG0|Nt zZ-*S$-`@tz-=>jpevZ}!UXRN+OD9QqF3yKgkD81b@{Cr(GlBb&uIN7eo=&z8=ed4Q zxH_PXUc%Ww&Odor_3Lu}rUfECod1}T-T#TopYh3}oJUt}a8W1OX9v#hW5$AdTD^qp zfxD1S>3r@g?`IA7ciJGzm;3u%@E(5TK${fk5z&s!YqWL+-w%F^DkD3mI+-cbh<RRL-(gE>8*3`gKTEM+DjWPG zC6>0N=Ux&d5z?>h&vU`Ab3gP$SxYQm*`McwZ*Tlt542<&Cj? zr9BzokKR>cD18rFsb6W29sKPl_HCjuU*^+1Lpi=sIB49lqhHT~ydNpyG#@XJep9*S z?22ALY`VS7RL+a^6)2w1Gb|Q_ zH@yCZ^Nw*s@4|`C1bDrha9)=)1K*J|XO!9)5s%1wA0a_$H|kgJm|vL zDG~pHb3gFl&mqI)`MLqP8>!E=_65FwK=s~$xN!Wu;8p)~{sNApY;TC;0bbL*m1%lo zu|I)*(eY?^d(bU89xBCk;Cr7gzAfvwERBvw%{0|+IUY9P9FK8xx2%)n;RMd{sL;9h zU^yN};2xx3mcBPAUOe20ix0fIhYS9V7Y`Ni0;C(-{xmij@u2uB_rn<875<%k_)cO< zxE;$!q&&t7oY$kx;3uUF|07ic>IT)z=+$9b*?lef-#PYay#^DYi~q7IENn?r3?9MS++6q~&0a3)!udCyea&LQepx zKT*Uvgx{PW@yTxed%{2ZO?DSt7IxVkLhk9)n;uTG5Grt>Wp|IoS2UIg9FaHf z6Y|_|PF_9#xZKWN$dCJhmlvP=SL%n7?7(x8?(@7}P0l|P=lw_zEWGf!7Ws$ki!QKN z40siQ|t{cgU_7YFO9sEb$ z`XCh9M8nF%Db)+BVqD4rpJ-G*fh*DFlQ7U*Uye@@e2$MdSi2j?CoHeA_7L(3$hUOW zr3dhDM8D~M)CXKYc3-e&Q-Vb>DF000Mdf>B;D>4nw*%+)e{1$7OQM9kfOGkuZ{KHt zTz~YybCEjUI`OHzFE)3)=+C(Rz42zf(z1Mz>GtE0A`5^bu;LH-8^i2T`qZ;jvud7R5+{YWRSTKR?s@>C!Adt9cLVm;6W z-urtF{K5NUMQ);hR@Tp4@HeKP%4NHmPxhH|#QpJn&Of7he>r~qzHV+GV=lK^poW5o z{0b2t_V4#P9kb;2>xcim{xI>~Ps$}&g#wbdL!R%i{PgO^j%o?#_`1L|Y}+|KQNmfC z>qqsT501+6xsdZC?cLQ>lJ^~lwz4vOyK&J!f#{Rt<@Y?^2eVk z*5^#<4_~M@_O@J~Ga#3R^w^y(`{a0M<2?Iw^rhJ*y`?x_dgPx2-tCh|`tW^0%0Cb1 zxjlWotA{E@k~g88^T8`S>yOvueaC*ZheF_|?wekb_Z=(amF^L77s?RtkiD@|Lkn9Dc-(grT!f7o4sCnkD_~x%(ImJB}JC{Q9t*CkS|0^I9)Fp zJ`{e^Z)%sy`E~&F%w->sxyaW&#HEAy%K4)O`u_cM!Y@e*LnHbX^G65xtp_=lX@%ON zzhu8dF%Ebnd&BiY?fzKwL;U>AswbugrjKoUo|J^~gb?_=&NVM|b=={zEjlo6SS9@D zb*`=le*f|p`{&bvtIfc9-qX9*BD3kS_K`UV)l1t5(Jp+qM1T49!)-I~6#QEyFmy+e{KR4vONKc$TX_My(*`Emic|Lx;`{31bKNf-<+xMX7r;o__ z8&(VdIsY}oj3Z?IX5egR;^aVSz8)d}t-!fm?>znS3ay!j1Q8$hzt-1n-jVwa zeowL+dh#?~Tgu}Y%X2@RI&IB2vb+~^0i;=puG-wck$qW;_~h{>C*TK0Iy*&ATSc`Lq38 zo@PVcTs8VRvd;#2)~{Lm)akRSYQ3Fjxr+0Ua@ zKG#zS{>rVJmZU|ikBqO%afm21J_Rtom~zpNASIl}SBLbQ>IdI%;P+R3*7?hQItQ`E zc&gl=?ScIAL;sA?+ak20KQx{y_h~9Z&-|HVtxxz;qWfbyAGRyzIRCcVb8LxdR%Pj}| znHv{XiBoPx`xv;~{NV4oUH7M=7a79|Dz{(-5pQnmh2Rr~%FVP+_%D}trb?%BAdYUN zjB}cZJUGpS9-NLO;eJ79lg^VpSxM3LBz=zfO#)<3R>f$X&%4sZ`Fu&AMWt2cDePza zY%9feaY%tj48xzWeM$Pyh5vMl`mLZ^?8oGBpx>Qc8xqid2)9%f^O!8imG~$9raUfs zl0-XY`Ccc>y(7zKLoNsDm>UhYB|?9=zUeZt4=Qk4_?rjbvLD`iL?as?u{Rw3LDBKb z2cP}PS{!X}g7&GRah&S6GC$LL5s&4b-t(O$=zHiQ#_yzl;`9A1#uE;pW`@oq`<;3e1Mttwgne*o(YV;q3 z8#f3)U5NM2Cnir!1Wx${z83u=ud7?YKbrr}OFU2F{D|*W@NM9$=5;y8*AdL8{CRvd zT@~e5rFE^+YKLGD?t^@O8Bu;WCN*f52%Pe>n8bchwyyyEo}1RJ*4Q{FkrLmi;H$jC z|2kuyycB00N~cor&ES_@5!CX$igO`*d4GVduCS}cZ)^Tiy9FbHL%y)A@TdLPn@VYb zlYIq8MEUZ5E-(1!zZp3{$;mm1l=wdI+5Z6e8skZ~7I9)J;(HW))kfj}k`R1lsEIc^vKzLfi;1~~a?JtgG0UHHK-J*T%b$tU#iU*em==ePvH z|7&RfN?MeU%r_|b>03lxjy->&jn2bNkw(htr|5FZ1pkG-=j!mj7nUM^K*7%j|Bmai z{>e^eiuAwZ-mHi$$2}kVR&{v9^6!o#e-TNJyX~y7S2cU%NscSw#;w9nZjUX@zi&*E z;;w=m$I$}*;4!-QwLZ$F_#i(E&P11!4gAMH`t&hfoVfeIXZ>#Q*LPi5UhgT^P5+U8 zkAm+5|5x3u>|}Q||G(pio3mjNIgZ9{A|7@AerBC-sb)KAq&PY7o?=r|(XX9(CNZQ5 ziTnt+Lyr4_3UhZqnFO5d&TJArj=I2a+4|4c+5(}6{}SJ%;OByG(vBUb3ouip#Mgt* z?IR!jj}ltf(feZgrpD3s=(h{MlMf#6m+Xz@XFd_l&j3H8!_ccKo@oAm$Gv$GS&n-S z^!;GgZc^J8MLHLXtM>yjkF*^U_l*{{U$RGo=hg`?fE@Q5L+?GkF$p-uMfn_rDo^I4{b2$4Jx<%NmU71OGi!+JBQxX-JB7bj{!0IZ_xrIF*>6b%ALFbA{7t_; zcstI%KV9x7(Qa&*mpH&bw#hm$-utc{PmA%~hIyO^{GTdL&Z2#P@xs7x{weMS|aTqe6GJ2hpx<40}tC%^t>lu zU#WHrf8T0kQ78I@9{x-Eay}K$6BxmJ{$qR-EVjZcVCwFsT?#tHi;hgq*$K?xDV;+hc;H##j$q=;(vNYpH_Fe zwt9gygyXN)W89kwyx)h{cUukbKLfmIzR&kd{_HmQ7ug@{7b0Hl?;mS_Gq68Yz7F8* zZ}KC@%zV8-{+fZazi#~QGvWArjfbo#K8SBn@V)qbuHBlhN$z4U{YUwS5SIe*9$MD7 zqdrc2X2JhSX9iUJ%~ZWA4^i1@t)d}Wp2Csh7+z+BFs>jU4P z7;<>?ayfqPy&`@b-y@HvndSI-fpdIo<{bNu<467lfOC9rs++BpuD7%f;5-is;djS` z^6n%LSy_Bge67H_JPbZzU-J6}ZM2H`M#@jYw}9V#!3Xt}*IQ(-0elB|)v`V-Oh$Q- zJ~!GW=kEdU!%3a%r=VY9izD?5d>?rBe_Lj!#_4~?qkI~-zLI!jz>RN7M_9h7d?y00 zvZTe~PUoiZb09_YT)uv0V~#E`In^0)32@!|MadjIluo(GdZ{Cqw4w+`?}7WPd} zDiC`3FX`j{$qk+*weI`cU~zsvoacGUxc#N|x?;Sjf0_e-Djj`wo%UMG>!gA7^Lh-| zH%Gk>K1)Ek5^nr5x;<|-AF|5pH5TCP@0QE;8z(}Z{8a(x^0VRhhE-#0YMf+6@j>|& zz#k`g*J^irOCQG{{;18M*PB|vq-e$_$@;GzB{=0M*p|& zyhTtP{e!38 z*{E|AbLl_g8x(vC_+8%Ld|P?HlI#tkoE+fY`hIHl6qHvae{T19Pq7EQUiIzwQ_)Yd z6_NZEd>{C)ulnaq2|qJM8p$91WC*;uGwXIt1CPp^=WDN_yh|*6w$j$O_D5d(MmWzG zCIer1LEUC_>1J&x2g13&Oa>98o6hDe6xPzl<~2feRAUL0P{T9uv(3JLbwC^x&9vgaA*5O33mf$e}`uM z-B|;i{Ivq-`sl^)j%_b*O0o$*_%G#W1|C4V^4VEGCdct-8T?tNY0E!5@cq5u9Lj_A^Zf~K@5de2`XosH*!Xmz*DmR- z(R|8Z1-==)??3-YpAsj&A0U2fI&?o!>*{awNRu4jmB7=MWYw(qdWDXRbNl%ac(%*z z**bmLr-YNeKIF^&8Q(WwJ*rv{<$68wJ>VC`1HY%7>bXLBzk>Kq1>f+sh)4eN<13Z- z%_$x>=7U%EkgZMV^*o;cbclpMRtdJGUSFYdKz+X1C!^;&jWBJPU8#nmdbj=s>dk9%7QeKMt z#Xj(x*yr_%_dY`9`b`M@FIHQI#d{y2a{b15OvLB8`_)UtdmkaM--r=SSW3_1_^>Wx zg?u8MaN@Vj58oG0$iaD{g|WZ1;B%UU->NH7vAaN{?^Kki@OXuo2l+8BW&^88$o1-vfxGRh|wgjqxT(L zs(SFgkQVx#kmLTpal86`6U@c>3%85)Z4Y>}9_@BcBjG-Uea~0#J3C3j^*e<;`}gfr z=Swgit}jK;T@*l%>RaLOrInjbYoUkjCB97~^zr*pjo`O(|8-FZznLHD524ozp0>l% zXZ7HbJ{53&|EUwaMX$_Q9`Cs!Laekk{exxs(1 z?aQ@E;rO%tBo&YE1OKPe6P}~KLgrK4yo&k}0-y9z{jeSt>+@`9l~b>6mD``?goqEf z-)7z=?{fQ!)PLX{k8}D<`?y^Z?gY;LOUogHKhqVrU$tkmi04COQ202p%6Yi@-mfC> z4WatxgFM^EdY*pv>TD+SU;0h;!jJo( z4&2A*_a9#P#j-icN>arK@s;}t^xum(jLu&+O=~IU(tpHP?kC6q|3QP?B)6Jfh!M0nhz`_f-1a zkQR72URq`O<+8p$BWCJi%TKE;KR@{XtKJ%Vi^!M%l740R6@qWsl8~5;_963?RrPN1$8Ws8|Gn!92q1S_yzsnH7Z&_E^?}T8q z9Xk7Nao?8bHN4MqkEv9Pc>64k?}+x|Lh28SxEXtW;J1R` zaONk~)fU0yztq3vKz|<6p&Kvnm*2w|WPGyF^XI!2hih=XMe_Pn!k&CX^2!02AcAJne6yySL5?J65_D};O^1Wl(!yktJLD+|sOjp~8&d-lqG?8Z`} zJY+qzU)`zD&$zFHXr~?pF8dRTpHeIw?1Dx=WP z?JfM?v|91nC%=bLe@4W?gmmzNfz#u)H-1iq-zSmE(tnGV@AmoWOzwxM z{bWL(=ecuqOYZRelW-GoJJKnWXD7?;i|>c{yrN%x@agdu2^LYRB+u{R%!T~vV|6^T z{eGP1`9;rehb^-GF5p3=pRes$Uv9t3^4Fge@wooH*&VO_#*{z!ujYRN4O#krK{n23^euaX`+L&E=Vd+Na@Tmv zih7p|x$ZwqIL~raFMK%9^=HBPu2tmk6BGdFdVTrKYmMZ3qbd;oa=mST?cL>EZ>V43 zat_WF{eltvN-1A0{jcv61n|6$1^m5}rf*6zMYr2XzcW|($9xC)?iVVq`mgU3xZ#%v z{IAcxcTg9nUvQ#duz?={pNfRy&fh2C_$tpEFGSUcqVE%A;Jkb12VLdzu;M)Xv!j_R zB?03Nm6roJ&l}&LxxE)ZmqNH3IKKyNbi=ef`TGQ3;Mw?o!O(Yq>7bGH2Y_>Z7^1J- zN$zJtz_~sgnQ`z6_XCu_;bL@ss5vxyqWpaVGjQ%_ZXSH6k3LgWaGJL$>x&iqhOZsn z|6kuH;CMN}Up4k_+JAkYfcYNq=QSQ_|F7>8aD54Y|553_yW@VJ;QyIlt2nMdi}-Lq zV#aT|-BLf2iSra0s^>g^r|Dku9A(QfiS71xbp zmYi;)Hi>c|Jg`{c`H=gz>&a0X3Fr2%$9uPjcxSCjFc!Obfp{|ez(9`If3R<_jw zr+Vl>e7T+FgSTP0-l0nudiXE#mE}_i{-xm0Z|U{Xej93+{=18y~ytR^WOZDTieu4$k*PdF{NszNnrP9#Y`lXU-2l{3;H@ zEmuX{Y)Hq9Upj#6GU2&@i+r8Hmu}kJSR={jJSFO}2YBPZZ?)#~B6%au`&fUk!tLSi zDsoUc<|@ju06Zd)e70Nc=Vt$1IjsuVe~PnGUdV+#_*M92L~21wIK??j`c3uKmL;xh zoJe{7*|V{F(fdY8mJXTk?I+}1(Dzf%u64K_2)5um`wAZKE64-?!o3@Z;h*Y!*^I;O0WtI6leY}vmJ5=A8o8sOSlW?P0-V0 zySj9ug!6ZqbHTe=<z`?~D2EMC?)*e8;daO|eymzmf1-r5e=hK@pIhb7NI1vG4m%I-_^Y}c zAO7yNAM$_q%>RqyL-q%8p5wCBHFYV+g>e4vH0ux4G+mI(M}I^3Z9-b{@n&VTQu$;u zK1I}nFY5Gvk=Ny^KjiwK3p?!KrysdmSGgWf_GE(R0&i9G&-3`N>keL* zBE>6TVNbI`bN@}1@Iv4`KAn5&+)(-bZ)`8O*Yw|n{}u98YtziCs6+OT+iM2+$NSY9 z5%2wP%KB#qe{~(*>+#IW+Fbw0~e{o!>l=3Alf z(eL|okU9exEu7zJ5g4 z$5TQguKbt$^}=rBA0j@ye|tc7=kHQu`C9K8QU5~AMQVlITP^?SSfYS6iePeneVYAeL_d--gr+exD1sua)%0@{7Ksi}lF@@Vnlsu(XsnmT!b!z8*LHDf}KX zadIPrCzh|=4`Km--{spiOS_}_RG;05rvtp7+8({n`#vci%J_M}vzFT1C*FQfW&C{L z-%puQChmSuMf^hG@0pqRPQ3k|%J>=Yh=sqsqeotlmoZyeT z^}SEI-;?6!K>WPm{q@SupDJaDI7jN!E>Z8e|1AJ-$3K6xuZ(_)ONIE#{!n#S`1k#< z&p%cr&iJS7ug%~;HDl=Xs*3)a#y{?_<(5d}Ujh1U8{~_|Km3;Yk?{}b$#&{D`TM6& z!ddTJq{LUg$Hfl*t+%c(insqq`5u=X@YTmXP2=tVQNG8;5B}cu zr^?0K|C5Drl;d0oK3PolEb~ioozCONk8`J5)i&Wz1piCKhp+$6OkQYClyEz6UYEbq z^s|3767B-d^ZE4`c7G`E56T73>s6x?7iMdV<%_;A+5;8m_14ZuzItd%WGR8_2Y)}b z7w}FC+aKxHN#9l#KB(U7?+N?uTgCX1TS27z)|Ja*JBdpN@q@63`6kFewRLe9wp*}8 z{QTf&ftNb{-y1rcU_|sO>Zc35ZqL3|E8cSn%KDiL{x1g?f5_KKoImMT*3W$Kk34bZ zcD(obDeI^HZxNsFt=FtdHL~Vn`<3-G1N_#lRvj*3h~+Emrycy4?oZ#s_ZnG>`VD3M zB#h>NCd4%d@_wX*)AdY&^qcs$zM?+woD!c8nkSnf zN9V%v*6}=<$4#DB?jF0~$^V)sGd~;p{{6f8MV?=BexzU7@8*JE`}Zl0=78U$(-d#K_wnSzKR<%8hEbD~0PSs=rGAg5dS9{&#?9RSN1o4@V1WX@_G6HnCJOWjzRF#CLMjLLV9%mq+i+Jq$h}Yy!Asuf8~2ysK4g^ zM(!_Zo~MT&nULrHH5uyh5~uT#`)Sa__X)Be6YVMV z|KzJz3;#%-^7W(tXb8lRlf?{J)T-T?X$T%U!I z&iQVA8(BBoWgHqko_VA7X_fknSA_mSwQAj0>LWjt`Y4~s{G9bBinwt6%=j(qqH@c` zd0}UGJeVTvw6ziWYZo6so`87))o&gLES<$Vdzaoj{Ru{r7UL<8KRjM%V19PQadu$5 z{dwL>qMyu#9e$)O&RrjxXpE>W`a^MdfbRmY5b2DOXMT-yzpiLq)B-t^M#N>-@EU`X z^wIarsUBERPP|T)1wI);?MrDd$D_fzwV$btMW#mnA->YyT<9B>eCtEr*T_=D=XFZ9 zHy`{S{q8@^`)8O>_U0&_C(4tzl*RGv zRnF`3Bzvh|2k~33r*u98=k?lR|LDEWF2u)kT&$O|9H-oGB_U`=NuJ{vZU?#y={(i* z{I}6>Y!dBYMzs!=SQp`ZpUe%p3#(sBi(JHnl@jj7dGmXsJ^k?Qy=z4_gv-sQ=nn!? z{^YL`CtIn!L*S)joywpqjtBKqCh2$Bj-qu+{@!nP(>jiUTlQ=wec}3{%L1R*9e6$K z*};c0IflfggYtJO?9P_*qx#0r39vri$GdO%LyA>E(H|@IQ9jg<om>VMzOGaB-`0hO0e zVP^*TEbm_@`d`+c^8I7gSwH!qloxX0_nt#fHqsnPFZtn>ep5YkbrJS=Bn9E4X{&n^ z-$}dXrT?iO7J#3-Myy}(y3c_DpJnMIEMkg-_@+667kp2osuU52kVQ8o*~3hU-&y3( z>$_&~AL`p=QHnd3uUGJG;Gej8rB13dmLKdS^jqH-_00|bhJja_mvF@Ljk83*!uI&U zzvS)OIn5T!S1I@*)?Z-QUD6uMx5FORZ%h^OskLXt$E7T>{7ePk3VyS(XB!&Kv3!%l zUnlsPi_5%F+8E2%EA)H8*WCK{u`-5Oe(;&-@+ttoYqwEn%0|;8{ZfIVo*PO;_Xj4c z(8t$TH@w?tsC_~awIdt&{NA%6U;o)YQNo?T`Td!B`@guXk#G-ieoxh*M<=gMl5ihz zzRrDr=rjGa5?%nD?>D`C$+})A;i@#@53lQ;oBBt0zWyZpjllUjyz$#VUrd(dEx`FY zdVQmL<5MKu2AtRR4$U-NNR@CWaGpQ>Y%jB=L@}<;=_%s-G&&DQ>l3NR2bF213Ln(| z^}Pk&5qQT-ZHBKe7-wWWqmRI!0j{g~+nN#?fBp?T$&dEP<#+hEi~HpAF_skZ;rJbF z*RrluK5B1Yp}#Zq&wjDWoKcM|!#ICcmcY9LKh`d7;QiE6dkCj-%?bT>+?TWY#dY+m zzQ+@|oQX>Z@ofse2frUmypXB&5v%whz6!VnX#nXTUABC~^?)UaUx4ypdsL-_{|CDo zR&l+M`91~T4E{^s)lhRiVLsI-5BN6lYG;JbrTGLSlE0$Ac7u1X)att>y{xI2uk5eA z;Q!(E-z?>c!&mgb1>irmuXYWCJC?8PuMGwfk4txluPN<}Nu#u3X` z_SX*ZPae8ArmQWNuk5cq;0Is#I?GvO`F2JB7y$oFhaDN^EwTJe1z%NK_?xU7*S&%{ zmTyw{YX-kte|x=(##p{yq2C7n=UMkkq#I)S%Kq97e)G3$mZ%g>k6ec<`)i`me8qx( z&NznU^SKO#Jnuth`SBxPEP5A7 zxE*MGHKXM(ZaME3+Qs}U2l}{Qd`vTFX9D6w?S%Isv;I8rhv+{`L|4P=!uE#OTY={z z9g~|>81^D^(0okk4*@h^&H`UwR>X&8O!&?I6QAbG7MvII#rr?JGlai<9WeA{<9}sY z;!|9Winux@eH1rSYoW)8b)Vx?iocFcap84>|1H1pa{|yGLVEPm?B*Ol(x?1Rr)r3p z*Zy5*O&499`l|d+r=^^T+tb!{56*Kvc)6DPA9}9> z9r672f!{LW%7#=yEBZ_2tcOIWM_T5U5WgZcqEET+ApN$uPwsEN;wG1Y$X)bL`idehCZrjS9{P^!H`(X; zB)Yv9ej~0+20wi8yEyl&W8Mpr4ZZd5zwtI-cgp!^0nbIc_SZMhbA6}$?Wtnk#rvUM z)kM2}XWy;VR3mE=XKzkmq_{h~IKurFL$pB>WgaiUIX`8jGgr5 zCynRXt4zAGR<fc|6}Z`1Dm?Of9fe3Ja}M885TTv z&=ng2HYgsvc!mZKUOWs79vD(QFb2hg7hUk;!A5}r8AA#~ez`fH6J8$u@g;xs)B8T> zoO|!N=gPa!!cjjFhw}E-LQYZbN{z2QC(Z3^fV{PI5#zT!CvAazx@^xTe#>*x4#=A~ zF4d&=oHVzuG|ol8(4yXM=yShN`ghCo= zU0sDr|Hy44cqi=H!56!gZLD;^H34?@^-2H5&BHsmOhVty<;h3o4{2A-dy_By1aAkg z0e`>Ux+Ux%(Jo1{d0Y=Uu3yR=8Yj7ahGI8vas7l}<@%)O-N%O=3(zjH>-A%Bf+Q`< zks>RHxi9S_2z#R6#;l-rG2%VSdR&id+oX{um2oy)CzDs^C;!-UYJBfq6L$G0?5kz+ zI>^_LzjmAb#qy%w^70B!#8Wcr6$^cCYa7zsc0yjnlLN;|-~0U-*>@rN`f2Q#fi9`8 zkQaV)wBH0@Em;tJ@+;~m zanM`!!`e^0UJyLL2QwaglM>4pN$15x9Orqhakn22gh}k{s*?R=$c@@|t6{i=k9!wb zzUf8&{yw$xMHM7Jj7qq3Hns9agTG+U+e%u#SRCi_t#6nvr?h`@{48`?*qoaC_Mxx2$BYvr>O>{!u7@ z-73G2OD+E-=-(eXcZD?n6j}bQpO1JT&7a#tU5M(xY2>h#()<&kuLB>~vQnC_wMPu( z3NIO}{#tvOA@}CztJ$ROp+kQ0;C~;~d>)_2i1tiuO#PnQzgejQ-|?8@>tE1g`_t#7 zKO(iSEKK#Z4I?|%+Sk3FT6^>OQpnyVSUUc2|BQy6Hc1Ws=6OZrA1kxJGOSknFiAWq zao=qmJ?ls#O+b9?jnSMo{sVyWey2>lb2??0F3pDfG2dd;j2rTKGvD~pgH8f7ha zNSc2<^rOJHiqAJB0_F4i`7Mu$jJyWv)2;g;1%6&X1gX()VqquU`+F^7c17{`BSNh> z&TZG!x&5|8Kg4&|x2q-Q2+Il13(Ics*?{+!Dx+94_0TDAnIN zg5n_Rf@&(yBR>7fG|p=w_k3Ob<5E8xaNIhY^skh>cuMML56W+X+**D1yh`{{*mr@q zf=@Vd!~fnrA$Bm_x!`e&ZG#dIY$SqjfakI3au>aUUS56nJFZGWqit5khyKT#V zPFlW{F|S+ubQ1qXAue3t+ZFG+JiUZZ#5mvq-*KWgIsQ(6<5wFV?&9lC+SwV7!t0~ zPJCVR*R2b)1RDiQ>tVj1gvZMi*zbM*?>iv|lHhH-P@s+wv42>ZP!AIjb z=T~;b@~dGIJ{G(+n$BnXnce?}OZYhOiI1rsd7G4Z5&>TLncpvHJWYH&l^`xIN-MMADyFM|1n~I4F3rj!r^5#X&y=iU~+d<;6PMh2ug@ z#7%N`**dirJ#Q&^-~In3s2;rk%=Q@NdwW99n@_kFdLk|Ik?YIfdnhl5&=c=HG{X+( z$7o$o>oJ>*7kd2jmLtp|D~BEZg!i*l2S3+W_?damN7xd6R+J<^SPzjr`&onIQhDKL z9gYiqQGb){z1sh4zk=TnpRL@0D5Y%R5b+~Fud^Y)86&rPB1NW>pQx8Se?g0SnW2{m z5cPHbsZWfb$HKOSRw5o1;%O74|HYFFXBk9MR?AELD52+`bi9Uj+;NzUHB+%H#2yS ziy?_?Z*aSbeqminc0H469chF77{gs-YVTd-=O1{#Cjs&WtIU2E=AFN!^_BKJmQRL! z{Tm|`;yn*?`7fS-C`e_Z=eKiuD+@kEx2K@$JkAkY4* zx;fXzV4cssqJ8}S=limX_aA*f2mUE~ zBaz3nXZkH{|p_H>Y|KEkn4(vL%<4T160OZ{e(G@iJ;T%O=h|E-gj zHy(DGZ@O^tc4>Ke9Od#RLjJ&?yYHq}-Z=2dz=;P|_m`A6OkJMp%l>~9d0{w@8=}53 zIFDohXK3?F`w*-feLVD;KQgD(6Y2YS_`Wmdr{3a%Xu(Q61Uwtdu&oV=f zzZ?AMx6zZrTofn#*B9@&502%NpjTpQR#mu@B?*PR8TZvCKu%eK{1I{YXrl3o(+M;5jZ5VW(}m zyeC2>JnOT+56@H&m-;&yddiAa&x3;`5=3N8_Lu51h5~!|Vu&ej<*?z)yzt4?8Kri~el> zjryMr^-PBRjuVf!q;j8fxE1#s^L@U`O5~STDFbb(+@~CFlF92Je{%DK{i)oi9Ik~t z`!g2uT_UFpN{@0Y@Dt@%$?V%8zxi~0Vk-A3hr93`1D8J$^0{<|EE)A|na~$si1QT4 z&3ByWp_0sJu{{3h$Pd>e3lz>I;iGY!=d<(6Prc>m{)GKl@EoT#CuS_31^S|X^7$?f z@)O<^+{(}SajAXsdjjW=c*qyLRU=Y7?uHvE!d~SmcYE{m$5MHDJw1>wcmDOisXa%n=t_R)^C?Xg@{6$PZRb#%ns|PW zI^p5caXimS+kwmXwfcy-F~PnSc>m_~Zd?z+J8_)j?rP0{mPwzZW}e5TWd)jC=5>}= zKiIUF_DOsnH1*cu;({J0A`V{uNz_O9KXDb+$GC-%?~|TaWnh!AROSJ*OkQ7={B!)# z(>&pJVfFLRXCLDd+c!b}1NpxBPKg(rD!-Kf;<~2`dUMTlD@0m8 zmqq+1+DCrfQ&Ek|-(_vd-_w}Bl$T%k)I$Do!8uvd8Uy7;dnu5=5poS@Eh?2RmgGeK zF|zBZR>*x^nSVrjtl!vbYUOo6epI#QBQr#^^6hrNoo%oG)9PssB)#PUYSf2{SUTW0S#B>f3_dH=LRJ}Elq z#w<#yG+lq?{wW<-#5iO?J)F?zama(TR9=ij${GRv+P}Ww=e{DUEIARRqWrz(^p87y zzZrk8r0LZE1_$c{%PHj5>v8@bNBcUl$gkwi9wT|)XDuP0g!f#l@m^*dGJ^^1l4T-Da&-%>vtw_DX^6mk4>$&SJfi zf;6`;A6MhJy7uSx7V^Fq;=IasqD}C_a$wYC?6fm6 z|AdzAj?(?31jzHaVk^D3iez0ArnwrZ|0Hd!n#Wb)-xTO`zdbZ>=q~BLWDu)Q-}3lU*CRjF?U!|V zYTvQo>xLX(I>=8Qr0tyA^&@$F#X>$&yCUps*N-^9Y>>Z@zj!Ng{YV;LqQ7!{Nso(l zfDP@M2z~CKDM(A@#X3M$|MNH?{Lb+fU6%UYz|O9>99N>BnMMX)7c)SAOS`M1Qk$nu zBS@a#*J^_N-6h?}rZ!Kr-_&C$zD-$4zh)`ThhR-$oQU!`a2{-jT^De}&2}Hdznmxi z{n)jJ)+dS|sQw$KZO)k5KBrOEkF}5&B@uBX&)?ROt|!^=Elo%zfB$tt&ffxi{|*F@Zha&oO9B>)LxUH5P_r^zX(h7=; zj1ZbP_3GMw)r+1LNnd4Q zYd&YGP`!`#^)D-qySNAvz!h#eC9RadH*QwzspO9NO-+WKWun%6<*(n_B4X$ zd9&xJ4pCteeG7Q*x3gN+AieoJ4VcCaW_rW|b-zHmBxI|W|*K~CuV<8eyU zzCB9J9Ekb_xxxG6F`wtt3sb(M;DZ%EQvDx@1KwX~>8l;8O?&f)_+OOYf_P*9^thO{ zkfi>>3D?NKT)vU-2UUn_lKT|&gN(4x<-0KbdX3dR4<<2h0ng=|v){VxeU9>v!3W#H zKNJVNzbxAqSNnK;>j&|_7$=BPGcZH z8GwQp<7})X?JcK&zlhg;Jf0L97Lkklr_dEYpM6-@zR ze&KcFx8>)ZFJWKVjOw#4sCq+R2lSQ4dp!=v`8`I}57ubI^OEQ{F*3f>wB>tvjV5@r zjQ_d$<6OL65WG#sFZ{uNJ;LV=ipvD>JZ{96{U?#f)70vl1o@7dITz*QsBfJp^RLKC ztVtxf{$bA=Ov>MD^DI5AUnhITH4DicqBjcDY^o{fc_XPp|%aq-YFoe^G7` zZ}PYh$3?tZ&|XI9^ZjWyq@{L5yg6`O=!^RBciXHE@{9AK&Bp5>unMmufkAM9*Q>yPlep<+F%z3s#xL)M$n_nX2`yK|!W#9HsiHI-9_XzpE zhY9k1AHMFw_g$0q)a~0LKS=T4AZ{0_yxhJE@=M1g9rJY(7WSg(uLfCvRkS332r=Ow z*F)+D?B9`lm*kiF#{hZuk3MI%wCo?ReyBZX;CL{0Vtb9SEq=njmGi@WJ7aDqlnc`P zXdmwY&+Dn)VcL{n3GV{W>*v~Kf9e$?;XU9v-ZQp;H&fdFCh)3ORPPe~TIY+9=*JJH zxZ(KGk6F21s&9ZE$It6+**8l4V*=0qOLr<=8;O6yl9S0lyxwd*Jfy$0ehJubgZK8kkk70|MaqO46~3RCcatWNeJ;NTa)aA9?IU0Rhkv|L=FGf_VJWU!eiq=$L4bYaZdqZh`^f=D- z`LOI!S6=rC`zGXTgxupRL(fO*sf2>J;5f%?t7+X@r;+eh_|p!#>g8s1PAlQH;GN+2 z>H3dM2R=1_xgl5jO!1HDzZ{RgXm3Rus{cPnMuhQm5>$HMc=SbkXd!PrS8sM|&r8VT z$q4yYi%R9dw8G|n^TZe9k(c$YE6`7^(02lbvRH2>Nz%g4+&%^ywRgwOC8ggr^{+?y zettfW81zbciu)HAO!OlUzTf4-cdMe>lAn5)KRhLs>pc+;$SWZi1MKg)evbE>r1trG z9e;N$4)WQTS9vV1_XM%97ll7e7`OSpj0DIFF%bvy@^ZYL&;CjmtPxV5e?nefUS&I~ z-|9IjcHXC94IwWtuMYAHf89~SyGjW7iSp{hsU5f;v5*&nsg;-8ui?&1m%pXF39#4s zLcv_$Qr=|9@A$9ItJKPCPz9D(-Jbj*$}840(MWTB__z&rVKX(_<7?z!X`QH^;<;TOgbNrn?aa}^z7co!l4?Un*WcGkH>f2UHran*eg8y zdKKR1WCbA~C6m{5AU_=Kt*XWAR+bm-Y?ZAi43HNx-hLTuT}|`pocpDH?@8M8VoBP6 z5_b9CqwD3p-&rR6y#805p49cz+wm`<@BMx-@x1=OKlsu`Rcw=g*uEP)`*UlV$yM?y z#_|41m~#j1dl_&af0aDD6S=>Oal;N?(~m7n;{b=}mZdjIv9G`;ML(d4j zI-_QqP|194UQ6|7|JNH=t%USE(+)i@U-=d#y9eYCp7XEy&x7x!_TAvQoH@of+7Kqm zUty$rasS$HIaxeh!gKw3Ju*IXlLoN`)JX=VU~ERpAm8; zZfD;nT`#dduV)TC)K?79hn^jnr_uH>p67-A7@7Z$nD6_qBM9CNy_oUTf2Zz_S|RnX zq7&7h%kLgNccaw58t_~`clUZ#r2b|9@c!6;wd=2!u4jzUXaBy)vM*?e|jzrovqhQi}2OZ*Y4sS-F&4Vb)cxK!T*J+99+{q8|QlJ<6iS9K=8 z{L}ntMd^CU34dzAH(Fmhi*!B2ab{Ue*9)G#ySFY_PbCoT!TvHqzrVR^BWZhEah%(u z=amKb*$>iqazHNg^+sw*{li>1ZbUg744p7hT7CuU$N7)koTHUAe^nQ%H^+PSvpKEO z{JH$xo`V{!91^VhTt5T!*?ybh$v?6E)Y{tw`Fqo6mF2i1Yt-Ia@K)fBrNy&L>&xxQ z<@L->Y8E8%w-b79;HdvBccuRDz+Z~4RPSkNQWi+tQ-kAN-@9+xX{7601N8Nf+gJ3r zyS%>j?GIpFumCk^7bE1`zHe1Ye19p3EA2($C;2>Pf&9zFpVp_%rEM0hipDf9`yM= zH6kB5FYJhY5i9JNf1~k&=Q9V6OZ_MIMG^z@_3mdDrS$;cPx9{i>%P1$67xFWzo6_+ z_0T@2eWBO;^5;u!-N5^)yk3riUg&p8#lp}ZMA^kp*q5&lV<6wd)S+Q&_t&{(>)ANS z3wvT5h$m^hh!;}L1cNymM45Ap-AlRM=aT8R6n z$Ug=4b&yL~J+`m({usVLMfZsOm~iT^0@CuCp~wAd>G_-rY58Kn+knqr#~$VTTSWih z^}Gu0lmNL|1rH4V+H-r{zDba;>KM@KYtQX*`zm9}AG3PDY8mNUJ&Bf}pD2&KeRYt( zS8sc()Slbp_Lau1i1P&aH5U3D=QgCJ@*>V1I4(-!Z5RLb)xs!ShH3x2xKeCmO_3CF z=z+ZI7VQi0b;0G?3Jy$V|0BYEndCe-A>WhyP{X=t1COJ~%4c7Gy+#lDNwc2hO>O_r zi0i3*z0(Bwj$L0ANNxX5etpLd`H!`J?2_94pZxlc3-U$u<AFzTfuX`?J>E_)-Vb0 z0MGrVU)6^D!$0%>>zV&4=r^y&{N3AMU&|m;qI{Y%)E~M0H8&OgOWHRXZ(&>f zMEPBiw?ppC&U`H*j6T|zzdXKOkjq;yUxU=XqbQGW59G~}@3KVd$u9pD^^?c9rVsh6 z#{ON_6oexLo| z<=%!O4@MrJ`6y!nJWaomFYzxpmI&$pflKFkfC=dp&D(ya65@B0Z}(Vyz4#{Go7Vzy_L zo*&xHf!D__mRO%RSWo)Wc47N^*qavdt{Sf=NZME4Fb#Mk@Z7Wt&7|uJD~|KJL-GBG zXVUX^cM4sXazJi+rI0$(^K}=FGoP;A6*bR0qQ3E&F`q&1Sc&DMl-~8X_z7NRB7gAs zdT)8L8hl@Z;B8u3uWBK8r+U>=-0!9KIe+!zJT7VZOfvhU(yX~HEuR6r6&Unm`HE># zKGCn_?|E}T?kC3|71L>a)$srE$)o-GIY<}e>x}MHFnucPRQdg=ieJbd4?e`wB;vO& z{N?@rYN^0}tA)G}^ZFww8Sk5nt4DtSwQshl`oH`a4nEWZc_;1{o0s-gB4;7|X$Q~s z3>h<`VY<)$@Q(`|f9~P5pY?ofx%we`wnQlGas0VqcX%PwD(U&HY5>)j=ihNj@3u?N zH=TPZ{O$u)CdkDNjrK^-C#^Wn{G@KTC-FQa z?DO?o2jm)mmm^wwy~Ks%mc3NYtBtnI=IbS*zv@wb?(ZJRM?HP=i2cf56Zxg=COfKu zjoY%k_Eird(cWeJ#-A@}5r9cOcg{wes2_UnpeU zAKdR!E3XrBn;m)faQ_kIHR8Aj_~+^6Su#q>>qK0r22p+A&e+tAzf&ai`T9D?WAdIG z57}>mH$ac|vtOTmN2(uRi}r;~kgH}0&YMY+zb7~O+kk%hqFCLP((*f?$MyK5wYG}1 z{E867C-f^^uhW$MB+BQ3z8>`t|MaY;w7pb=sovbK#r2hzvwbn1$m56i6(1DrIWUMD z0x0t1{YeAt*2%k4DV<*|IL>xXq`mIqIo0QHjQ3i^X}Y9-bEW;w34K4Geq(uQf8+k@ z=KL2NnkhgRhH6Zv!eY9M#B{lp;e=|b<$3-;< za@?@nM1FRZ(*n7l9(`9(+TR>F&iyf8hKISN?dJl|{dU}*<-NH5gnd&{iVyDp`zEd! z$?Yck8?UpN=XUx3+E+D{{HFyjsM}%^w{L3p{#X5tuwwys-Vu6>>z|sv|22L&V8;bC zj60Yt^%wUyZpTlvDrMpJ6aLbeseUfRU)ZRvYxw%I;JLqP;P6P zs+-il1w6;uA5RV~l-LiA#{A0jW6wXv&y>cC6Z+g5)PnC4()ejs32(r0o?q(K4Ih_H!dszlf?V*kJZJg4O2S`S@K*4y zF{gjYA<>VjK|$zILVPXxNz@3PV)VL zL8=i{Z@%7`XXf--->*owUijEsz921lzTTMJ=kdzvwdJEA;t3)`4@bEf$>k3I902bG$E5>+g$th@ar~ z!)X1-@xEx-%Wc6%AMM*8;PFj|^BoWD4YI}?LJTCwe}z3>FRDh8U(Wwna3=8qbiv<7$gK{_u9l7$JZ~|7{CW9c=B495x1VA=#dFzu@zp|%oD-oaKewL? z`KjvJ4odgi6r-trykGZ1)wvn(JNf*J^|A(XU9WB~E7@-g)8ja|-__h7az&sVLZAI_ zgxvfVg_kNNJo}&HXYrFpVIlg@<+ni34y=?vJS-CWsrlatxvPiUpM5A zHt(`c+Me7$9PF<##a$3mMvbWUm_$}&h#BuhIq5hL~Dm_{7^1-^z zG!F21bhJ^S`3(vm_3e{*`5-&=c|2-q8FAyV<$7^pLGVuSJRW@?+rPq=YcE%T4|ap^ zPgyETL_O_3??lg2tgpsBd(5wo zf;FFcH}p8Z{`~9cDrtN z^Y=@4UD!T8$ojc_7U*$&C~IX~9}GUV{%(i-^I>CZhgirC{}uk={_cd_`=EaZheA&9 z9vpYzzVysPn{*A6@H}3t#*sgaYl@r=m+)E~=kiW;|8_Y-!n3~&kSmyF*BYgS=l;(7 z@0(s``YFVy@cl&jOwh9e+toZgG15YOYW>{-xmM?mWz(2Qj{gdK+}~Z0GcUjNJT2s; z{x!lcit$wMK1GL_(;3+kq0hgN(?HI=xJYDr$O+zn+-U`3w#3jzdJnK zwaUW>s=2wjoGq`c`bMzZ>sevHe!DBYxmi{ z0laSj^B%O7*;C%otEf*u=qvljvHd?cp74WL*7vi*-kf$vF4ehM^|UxB{Omw~=XrbP z`c@X{eJngKBtiepie_zteYM0qfa5&xoeLV&g4aL7z83MqPWeEl^jeA~4q(Hvwe0}KPb}Jo&}Fy4TYTGqj8+ax!#%c zR|=ExJg&q-PM>t}Zn%Vx!*MR}gDZdk6CvSwT#1KV@g{5MC?!0PEBqbk3!P6keO!bVp`_;iCA6KS> zUj)x_%kM3_7}>K@ko~iLE88DQ<6F=5&5s3xm-?0C)&cp=n-`u5Nu`}QZe5W3dvu%q zp_1|_rcix2ZbttytVfuH=eX5CE@sHm$Z!d-$8oOjRNK}^5fYxi>tTdk9o6nNN(s;7 z80)uNw|HBS;j=$@9J52eSdsdrf+f5Y$9X=VR;bL95YuOU3wSrM_;1Z3BPIDOrlLLJ z@8CJ->vOz|_R@goxchT$SV?Jno8VVHk!{Y$gRrrn}*|;N{jeI zTv{NPE4J~9jF!*!ao{-f8zN&oD)1t|1dQuy^LGQlsLpO7~}p4WFC$bZOq zuzF@AOA-oyn0S7kMt(a|_3Z5|kQ4S4SWohKpaF8%7UkHH+V`pXe1rR&3Gx>cJA5bq zKDEf-g7v%|a_Y@>&t}(C`F!=k`6cgpENj6+Om4*O+G&t<<-ls$5v>Es-bX~%zWn(7*$z3UbKAbOdXf<3;c=PyaWi6vOL?AmjX3|iFz4O|>G_Ci29=lj zf;R?am7b4qeYKEFQ@v%GG{(>Q8*tnX`&o8oJ;mn(snyp6`I()6KAFxycKENfK32%p zdYk2SddLZT96uiR2jm97p7J7to-GjydoIYiA@|RtD#;lkCwSG&!0|w{$@}@&&%FP9 zasy0vE8g6*<+tPaL{jMM5&uSD%YNC@N&RbreFfIhxeo1*OU=Km|K6DIfmGii(>H&( zu~n+i?Q6jLZMk{wd8LI4E6V4AKJ(WiKGl}4tGIntv&at#hQe#pNc6QhZiW5L2TEm3 z3qG~>H9&sd(pz2AnW!B6SCoh2)daZ#Yw|Wu4>@W3x=?OAmG@N|0* zNaq{&uL*LO!kfR6&NsY{IHzMto#)co&)T+pU?S8D4nE#@Z= z`%>XswbZZ)HrUqok7C${LbsV^7n^sm&Oav@2tP-{M$)E`p@=xezzc> zTDAsxf+f5i$N7BuZN>ZvAx4GoC)(2p-U;kEb;nN}kAhcLru}lBf5R7)S}*MnieIUI z%x{@_<+8LtXu$LQ-!e_scGCK}k*^+dnbQp)z<&0X563y4KDGHHTCGdA-5ohZFKozE|zeWF))%SCmhMcK1N8aF55)Jnsv8 z2J|PMmo#(8Uric+r^$kGnC%I99*=oG*F*k#&KFm+>RFOdg-(QgDePK_J z@tUuv*dZ5O&bWuKo3K@3Ps8&7mL+7$I+Xm~E496GNgR?qieRUn6L7-;MDX z%GU~gCs6R>e!V0~+FMTl{pb3ebbTc8S318KRr6_hurl!Z1K<6CxF3(7r&P|P{3w6# z`^@paFe~ik@=Sdm93@zq2VHpISPb;`#FnZUD&bi_K7{PvOL5$g>YJfw1Mb$3t`P=( z;dc|t&-WE3Ku}yX9<*Jc}5}6KW{$aj(~hVzo$^Y zf%b(P9^Ai#uj`0-aIdH1?7tM~|2HY#8meK-ghHOY`kq2u#}6ZyDqqC3caO7!M+xlH+2WwB4lpkoZ2@ZU;u0L*Qp$d!t{+duX4J-!D6U zaEAK9TDD9mS3|)Rz`h1Fd5!HkDS7+~cOp!jHqP!ibpXXGUJKVp7{TS%; zx}n*S^1p_{Z-Uo>Hv_AM_8l*Meumde##+=*Yirt94bqdpg+4!DlK}lC_SeIuti9>} zO@7}G-yc=t*`oPUU6xl=36wX$Uhm!0%)Cb_WW`U6Q>yO*$9+p+{^9cclXg>l{Qhxm zm2_W@li~9GU9cC~Gv|@?l&$}-@4k6i{(=;Kb8tD9l0W#pL|UY!br*h%#&Mx9;x(=) zl`{s<1Kg}sZy4){dfR2s?Z(OUl~IBE+j_?Q_gUY2AG}Qe*0Dx+Mc(2k@=t`lWT4eO zdn)^1)LWjv&=d8JhrDtb#se$0PZZKz1|cu%t;ccF4~dY!??Z>@u=}sxs0|fDlArK{ zQ?~A~NbHGv#Q#9!u`-<2aZAS)Yn0~mxc$ZZOI*Yhev1~z zpNPE0PvoBfdr82)eNJqUwzoWgp(pBXgM11wx;FJ+wLSHEYjK?Owb)3W<9zRg0na{{ zJ4E4@wXaF0uUHtUUu^qN??3AYhw6U}^xOXI)hCO*#ZT1R1$#X1=RWiNS&$??VrBL{ zkk9EptY!a@HL~XbuUbL%zh0@no5xHMKl1trUExP7^z_hU9V60QCm}ETjTy&9TJ!@& z52`1he?;}BcqiVwenHx{f!1l2Cw#h{UME;8cM|OJ{HxSkie&&VUGLd?k=+!?zp8ux zW=5Q6kTp>s@AIa!sXWS4gzA;#j}`Z}SXEy+--zi+_M;&`GG)N|Ov=FXE#XJ5uhcKX zj|nK38T#zUc%-HB!jDcI7iAagGPRQ8$#jnV#MfCyl{j6QpL>whGlIVprudEO$MQGE zT|XYCXGua~pTApW{EPgeg`Vro@;&_A3u_5^Ra5c@pLZA`KXB!{B@voHzX*Bx_-Tdw zloi|hD!p+nt-p|$e=o)fc~#Vbv#EWDKqHGY59CFeMSpUxrFyX+o@Y1I3W}i`3Ep;w z#$)DR7rVAr${SaaAC1LGZq>W%3xXy37VuGc4_BYQ6OQqB4TXI>c#h+sqGe8pO7xwq zkLy>~toaH`zdNl5?`FBA4AuF&(_Vl1zYE9htyoRv{giXkfBd}wsx9>cd3$Rh-*R14 zE~Sno359)mdmAACw$l}7q_>~R+V6|`%L4fqeP16>qyAD}-rf$#+uCQWo;HU1Ueu6&tGu0aMhg4qlvnU)FHT80@RTw-OoueskqAi3jpc3yHaspKtSF{UA&V={% zJMENqY#`KaB#hY&+(Vdfgiwp~sFahGR-YzR;r*O(_%4U@Ivr2q`^FwX?g^n8sPRxb z`6Z#@6`|%MAnnq~Cd~94qX~ie z81*xFU|d^DyV~J+M?y_ELURwonEr&;!G!S^Lf1ILsJVp3`GnDn3H57`UPoxh{!8*E zN^7?eCT=4%{XwY1ecz_Nl(y|7OgRcX20TuvKS8KGOK5Tt+RlN$NtpD2(EJx+!b4y( zp&jp?OZbP3JAOb;6_?gz+^Ajrh)XB2ZNy{5V4WY(mFMLi2CHRfJA_ zMYU<9ZV+`VcDn5$XpbJ&4df zm@sh+q18fY980L11e{E$m`a!eG)<#)63{i9(&`0-swISRO9>6jfGdF57f%Gn{zk`j zs|Y>7=(UuNUQg%*#yTh+yOmJ0i_im%*-dG?lTdk>&~%hA3FtUWY1yM%^& zgo!}MU*O*odVsnR+E;d^!~Sx1LWi0#J}03i7ojdUp(!7stq7r}EMY=9LRBTCs}P#1 z5+(s1)hL} z6Sg3|6}XKsC4tbsn=p9~(s+-l*-7cdLxiehgfYhn^(P2*XOPBse(d<}km(#9k2+6i z#CMGnE>l{OL}&&&ZcsW7*K<5>N;~cms_zpf1Fe5i+WL?%@hM^aYeLr>98V$Cza><@ zBQyb%fSUJoJmnLiCW!VKY(P^mrIUfiFiJ;-6S^Y6=O)w?B#bFU7+r+W4U8^9X>BRO zIJ}R;8AEAZTS7}aLPL8(WnV%?Kf(mOcg`||(#b&GC`y|~6DEyA8sBM+pGIlLT<{AB zEei>CiwLzV2(9si@f!)FHxW8E6DFP^OmY$Gu}_n7fzp~Qgz6+h({;iWp!PPU&G!iH z4+xY0B2+yB|CmsV_cbSZD6Rj8FzF4U;yqz3&>2MMzq(*TJJ1|LX-ha^bOfPZNvMn@ zbOEC>Q`(e;FeV!?JE1-&(s>B2c?py95xVmeCTIu~ixDbH5XJ&MoGwYn^`!`-$`Cp# z6Y6RZ#@8m)*C#Ya6DBnv)HEWDGZ31Z6S{vQOlgC3dqPV$90$5%DIMLHP>=gXQgDBU z1=rn^fl6GT(&KuI8P^|7*oTkBzO)hhtMR77aA3#I{mtFF zQo_5>6y&T==ktR+Q;oaYO%h#?x zOp`t=UB6yJM(`#a=jV4e6q+2FYxZw0=B?oQ`JF){I}KT=A6lGw2Y4&W+jn-JAL?$V z>WOl4JsG*a15Mq!bkqtfR1O#Hcz{#R?L5CHqO)%oN0d{YKz?98yE1b7Ht1{WBV@!+lta0T{1OFxd-}sF?bN8*;DZe~?zQRr-N^Fvw+tsX{0%@P<4TlYSl1~utq`l-3kD*X}VvBI7M=xpBk^*Qb8x@?d4 z@ffj9r|7{Cgn9*q9XIq9yQzLB^^f9yU9xngup{^=9Ot->86Q-jXp@H@nU4m~aqXx* z=tJ5f5vQ1s1iA89H;&oppW`gdi?jA6BBm(-gPZ_k2)|O z;uEVnqd)z|{nY;*POk65iI;T)&V>1fO`&hh6{xR_9$KT-4?p|f;~@Ou-CFnk7v zx1z&6e>>{;Q@yzSi~1hRbMah6X}0gc`$U;vcwy#iP0fM7F|TPGn1A7(wnF3jC4A4k zwqYRu^lY&eM@GM_&%8M=@f`OvKjwYb^h5kM=563P|HXqnCI3k?#5Wv%OI%AY=?H(b zJu`1fGgLBkY;gt!Gu6S^Izxk> z1LJLzr_;72f9~@=zbwiZE8`dBSy#7P$yGgBKdvmi*VhF0+h?BjpQbPKuH>b` zGntPs5Lmx5`3knzR{buTc?ZTl?oV%9h4s1Kx=u#sU9xd8@!jzQ83$#$CFeO_YE8Lb z^>xL0U+~=ijjF#6Y4quXZ}=4TXZzg#y6(qLlo3}5J@{d>)-KXk;^%l>tQQWNN(@F~}?<(U2ZRMyu<2lAVq6e+lFaBcrO$s-%j zx-HzbzgeBe{_&7`Zl92*p7J$n9f)H4*2970XORe%!9PAQ&*h6qS9M#q ztZkOFzTs$K{co&$bbi;u58IiK$r@VS)NR z+79TMq4Ge#|1_Nf`I++y<{xsZKsL6o#eB^Dqg=(bRc!8${`h5{`+wSYiyCgsbm0u^ zJ5YY+OPB31;g@||W-y;3t6z~N6)%kYy^w$WVxIf=<&wWHuXjJz?;qy5f8QQEwCw&* zv18@-x%|^xKK#M8Zqy(-&*j^0E&oT=gGJ{suad>bjJlT|6)cjiDf7w_f&Sauz32MP zx0g?3-q|IPZyi?U)ZuLd&&zp^kBpsWD+}pfbnNMjEXum|| z4~43q__Md1XZv@1F1RwKO3h!GcggJU`}p?m-b`l}F>h)eX#d(W>%^CBqaVn5wtruL zUfXM0jE8w`Vqp2J{`_Wfr|I6WB6)ve{B}eI+TZKR`)Nm6#VqENb%DIIXsI)ii*vN~ z^O=a}_WQNpA6xo_)a}5$Nj84`)$y;#otlq6#JsM0p#G8MUCUGjJNx@r40xVDr}WgU zU$c3=e|}(|>tC~B=M{>GW5rz1o#H#+_$GUj6G^E(E9{;7vrN|R4_oH==JJ(Iy?k!i8`?Kx$4on$`_^CI zR6fZ@fwX+uQ&is@cUSBwcd_O4Z!RD9oBH;!*U-{^kO z_A0JjY5#c7Jg*1my>S0s>RR2ta{Igf6&5yawYDj~A{^vB{`FFHaA15jo43~1$acm%RM2>0mGNnv9h4($ z?f8!Q_@aUOHnWuj1{Qk2+6&V*UHO zZ(P6G($U7x%hqMNZ{GR4+_Tsfa-RG7s4926es}DagZVhv=XFTljUDRF?AEHCoac2# z`;{SG$IYwhl=Hk!*wZBAHf8nE{&9fq^Sqya^?>wGOAXH}*XMcsm?l@pjd@>glk+?; zA6UI_K!H!~{p)hJ&+}}(NykkKrq2I@=W*=9k3}A8hdxh`+vjoYk-k?gYu~PyLa9>;F&&+uounb*e3 zdG5zoZVj8i)Ya(I>GJR$hNZq$s^C31&i(z-?wjYv z9{a^VAFD25Jiv9r(kc7f_So=dG?!Bgp8M;_v_Ci!vwkYhyn*#`UA247&2Q7~J(-Pp z6L=m^{!;gB+iFYugUnmO^LVoK(#;mye6Rie!~veilYCjHwwqGqfq%Ynf#>oC4X!)v zMv!qo+xLLyem<(hjBZm~ZM@99>N3@z`KvvylsPhM?0Lb9cHr@cF-#ENU-$lfy7Glm z;b$Iq4Y1c_Kyu{Ow)MLTS;3oeoZI2aos!E6HLO^Vc^mj7T<^8lj}Bh{zrS{0XZL&7H-qOm7!ou7;LN?l3o&m4&vDTA zeww>S(yjBa%M!qI9Ly~Js6xXrldH3S5_m3Onft@uRJ@YecilsjF9kfebKj#47v<3v z^2f0{DKHMEWLwf;b6oL8Y+nbS=bLBSqbiRn@oF&h+d;W-Zetqy9AGzz+Q!E}A>|ggJfamy7)tKIE`s-a)SU(9o$H$}V@2;z6jc_xc z0-oa|$Kcx)OSidaWnO(1?Z1<7N@(IL+lr#6nb$FoapF%+!S4HwBiAq=1D^eV!!u&h z-nO0m^MRT5VSmzvVtK|r$TGfP{~K0C#~Zc|?iZ2$I0@~!*O;g@`zzfQ(ie)#5UlXE{8 zVLk>t$H(ZT$)`)bYVTXIh;fA1GmJc*`0i7|9)NG0fE^pK%J56OPBmH7Smg6HJ01IU z>f2E(q-ea+qQARgr$R<^-!;EZX~4YlI@OogH#-WI8Q1WmZ7=h@e&YG*!;i63kLCK^ zzkY~@KF{wh+{^cDE3NX6tIYHK-g9l)0WCDq{_`B>d43=H>2-?*d3XBzJM%ohk6AI| zOqcs3{PDy*&+miN^`4~IG-eQ&pLw3&J7|xr@6~Fif4pIy=l52&4wwF_`0iJ^KF{x2 z_de|V;$gyDInVQZiK5NA)aX-jKJz^9a6DvR5Op;3zAYZXf2|#T@laMsQ9H)npmvG} z?)hVS-tXHt^v~Zsu5ms^x;rxM%$wU6W+I+EGW`wVMfyFdz0tS7|3Ay&TSZVgR5z&{ zT43Eet!rPtJ;Q%q%KeASQL*9~)u2Mr7OsaGdR&jT?X&Jl*L25o=4~?jSy$zVSIP&pG|Ckfc<(9@S!Q$D<7-j*%!{O?rtQ*-o5i?a}DP0w*vd+ zrgu{+Po3QOl$__dJZ`?_-mv!IXgSYu*>v&Y6>pZ-{g3&$%z^dqU9?Zozt%o(=Hq4j zl$ae)mP|_clX-Pw(*KdzVx1~Pw8t`2IpY*qX{WR3pUC#5k&}C+w?EP-nxFzR# zTo|(VW$iVw*&E4u9v2Fa>(nRH?XmvzU(TP$h5qGxj(+aA>L1sb=W!vl`O*{`O&>{huLc+~R@{cb$}%kNrO>PgL1?^BNyw-rXk9|DI#F6Pqtl z`0H<#U9VV_DWQD#IXC>*3$)ljWB-8`Pt5o!{TyF-1&O%XzkcWkseIIr8jV%)C)%zt3~W(VbyO^D(c* z{tA~rf5)dG_PVbs$a%J3Y{i=CRg&TkGw+ny@3rjNnM{-J8ku)w2rPf|E$dQ#8{EL3 zKl5yV$&jPdf6SSFD(h?R2Kwi4@4e4cs$N;fe2i@WXr!U^wY$1W9ppUQAFyuWo9um6 zb(puv?9Z5Sf8~x5ll=9!#RQgr(c#x^sy&$FpSN6wKz_dGcX!!8#tviq39{>XxvDik ze3`3Bkfm{;{iF_?#^sn;+<(5sJolfd&S%QysIc^Rw$D8G zpSPb57ud9ZrGK1fp8L;$joEJ%OX-^Qg?<9H!@Im0Yt1>I@QQhj?0$^+h2ut#{NO&z zyh(PwbJNu$9Wsu3nU#5$?Eb9QzXrcuRBCa1InV8vvE}S!<=F}2nAhJAjF0k9*5zDr z>w#p5tr$wYa&{ zf3Qc(d5*8L2W}on+o0SdInVJ`Ij8NXk|CS@@yGdd`L|;VUE99m zM5gZ_HDUXTa)JEgx_PJfo{{b+<}ED)`RBQ`1Ai*G-#>pc&+YT}V36zl{n?jT-~Lx% z`@DPKzQ~yhrTqPu-*d(OTlF&XK+0O3KYo~J`->Xx+R;9^r+?o|@i5SSy=NKU&8vHM zJ?C$eU60>*W66^>$-jIapTM*I&YqWHkB|SFj`fW)`_*eb>T-A0;55vuD+K!I@w@tm z{+(E01M|t6KtBA~!ks&d{O8+t5%X8F?0WZzIR$3!-alQ(`pSBN`YWI6Ua4018Y1Vp z{D05QQ*uYp+)2!9lF2^?TpwPkxl{DX!MpKtp07tAukm}HU9s8y{fqT^UpGc;zSw%r z1^@WLJn!q;D&P0q&Km7MFJqqfbzh(Bx@cmLMjz$*^S*9;vo@0~2?dHfhK{_c=#vmW=A^E`gMeg9#8RqLnWa-PSJU%DkNicLCsmHF73f$`UQ z_a(b-n9JY4;$(c*i8W@|h_Jn3eKW=vwjcE@pLh5>%_|G4h=k_1z`rZ8I{Q&>^mw9ggmWRe>9ld3vKR%h~_D^20>;AoVSN#2x zd2avaN1t7578~VXzcA13U$f56&E?Zq^6!%|&+WgrUeKxjYZ_0J*Pq)z{J(o?v~Sx4 z%Xx19yptCu&WO3*RL*nz*PYy|%W-Ga6gkiBU$oip>R%iWmdJT-pXY~;T+~F*Jj8s$ z7xVLpskhTP{r$sPH84JIg^jNGwUA2IERT}My+*4iTHdHmWGI<~~cw2xac z@BTY*e6L}8d8CSS&sgTovgZV%($uN9w`|*ya-QuU>u=4Vb`3NzuYVe7e`{;?f{gWE zUSK|0*xw zJ2qyP^K5^~vuhhCMdhBryy974`49hFu>IiUW1Y+!I|SMv-!*)T`bx?ZInVYVj6GK^ z9oFM& zU<@!Gn7Et#nhez8xtKInJAzcXagnylYl8e^*+i^2ebqE`4T763OujD z&xL4^HUjy14hzzDpcCi@D)4-P0cZz$fO_2DZv{GlE}#dfI!NW#0u4YD&VZa}1!xC4fo`CJ?^^=ufkvPOXa_ohZlK~%~4s-(DK!pqXKt0e1v;gfu zC(sR4;(9z^_lQQCuhYjO9S4jDCIXXz$_rGEC}1=&78nPN2POiOfl6GjkK*h0z*t}$ zFdoR)d18_%Unj2jL|vz}63Ev(Vv&vm#sd?9$w1`|)B_j|j0L)YF*iw0af?s`)B}w` z3(yI)1KmKyZRi8_KqJrsv;&<$H&Ee*K2Q%d0xdv0&|8>mP|{y;s@2($q0 zKqt@*R6K${P!BW$EkHZa33LM$kD(9L1C2ln&<=D0-9W_?=mYgYBhUi01D!xOQ1LhP zfqI}3XaU-RPN3o`>A8{CAZ-Ndffk?>Xa~B1nrCE(*VlTaEkGmC4s-*ZK*e*EA1KzK z-lgdOd;fQ*!RF@Oy3{lKF8B&z?@#Ox=?2sNP_DORujkV>H|O>$)Vt=oqn$KhOe7=VF#wu%&yyXW%-Y+vYpfq29@t?+pG!9_2LRITbth_xU;NMC>Qv$8{;bKEnIZ{CrOWu4`xulDzpRLL1IUUFj&z*JqNj&uD@F zcwaLS`J`kcdA^>+=WYBvpr#S=?ka@*oF6}LD#F0~9%hB&9pVlsj{B~Y6(&6u;;BvM z(c>~--Z)F}A})O!p5Ff%(+a}-tL2N!!2<^N_idT`jtP6w?H;J-h#bLsZGe-Q#+ zKG=riUfaH3hgL&fInrxB?<;`k@~oXbZNTJV5i^CbC{HF*Q!uKK9%$+`U|_d8od$Lr z*tB0@cMi!lSz{rcDG->>`Nfj#?w_MY$?k2AWDWbgaXga7;= zdG8+P+ELw!%CBSD#vrhbWo(0tF_!U5r=M!TSjWajwlNkMgUlnATCF~6d``FM?qlm< z7?hb1lyDhD2tmAp5+)N7CLfy1FenfP0bvk%iaalCruB!cvcQvQa*>b-3<%oYiP+(f$FuzknJjhSG z1U%Lw@@v??+;RAFUivxUp8=dsz~O&Mr;2%ukrPksqCJ}5!n}LzCpJG!zx@>34wRly z75UKe9Qq9{?qX~=VEZSK>vCz_WBE#c8q;IFV7fd9 zJ9OG?xMP9_H}D{%;V1x%DpyQ-$Eh0Pt$rv=*M0AO+WVNrSKcE34MKF81*3u z%m7QkDzE|U0f)c|FarO_fhk}XSOzwM9bg|g0!HD_1TYQE0V}{dumxnfl#s8kBbWZ1 z?Ucy-%v!N<>=pUVqeZ7Lcl)E>>9%|i?R@74*KAg%^Lo-B{I*dlKfv^Vk$(b$FH9x& zPuzTmAbN(?Lw*8bm*?tby%Pn3Q|^l&2d@OAT`lx)btPy2zvZMSc2NFyM=ts3 zB0l*8gk7E+e@DfSo@Mh*xi9`0dK2I?AH9ohKa^GSk51pn9IS7@0r~rs9W}&9F@~B5 zyFAGU^|JoZ4$7}qdWXMAnfua zKJ~JlNPJg*r3mm7y~%T||H#iE?D8aj1o9G4REV7WEbB_n^DuNh_yN*pKB$NCBCZRF zeFNwve~hrp6FV56`Otc&FQ%be^d`=o&377MmnV9|kmrEZ%l)S{B|i)OBI^tJl)Lpt z?C2mq`F(_4p4c&hoJhSq_bGDTY`eb%cCbGopK`a~6gyIgPkt6*mnU|VAtzFA4bL47 zWe1<1m_PCoS`Lp?B{bIjOKIOW9O&~t` zX@p&#q?d!7NWDByuBPl@KHwIiPwl>T`k#4>0}6;gI*3nxA7Pg_^)uqJeoD}lGhLC3 z-pG@!f5?v`?D8c32eX_#W08v;EoDa+VV5WA4In2{@8oJ*E}_V5{r@QJ00@0*_isYr)@!jNf%xR75q5cE z2lcYOQZMCh|0sHE&_jL`VV5`cC*&O<_41sop^|eQ2kj;Q@+5u>^3Vmd?IDNffw+?YEDWW+wBw&a!2W}FWD%eIGQuuT>|lJ_tM#&+ zsJ9J0!NqW?)?;n&CB|Xs_y~z59`~<=-PxOwFUK-bF zZ|qsNy_S{yd?A>hE-%VmyTy(s;*;M&*yV{GeaMNDhRC^|cB1UK$4U(%zTW!aa+u1Ar&Efq-N6C54lb#=8|4XDEhTZ2uu`l!tn{Qr^BJA?Sz69h%>g9U= zEUr_|daM0^5!#8{e~BG6#3#Rru*(xWsF(Fcr+1YI@Dsg5=plcCu*(y@9mpe>&bEi_ zS+;&9mHc;*585k9ik`1QzDy$wiXA1yC%=lY%aizDLVVU2>ZSaM(%Xd|@&^dJJki^L zd<>-CI@T{lFPqKxFCd-6PI{t;^4lD_PZS8}#5`c0A* zJ(RomE3qSs_~e%nc6k!N204*>2YBz@R(3o9hn?l*Tl7%=6h|(03=yCF3BoQ<;zwfE z4@BD0TtWYb>y-a2(qZ{g{x--LfdXPj3GvCVBJA?S4(et3NqkrC&aaE!F7%K;K-lF; z{08J>AoX&;c=U?ddcbiN{YF0JSBL;Vu_KN6fP9FacT>)c z7)4@71Mw+tGfaWuN&L4X%yvjSD1V6v@Dsgb=pjFRrOmI)6TLm~Vz@3UL|(=DCTS%< z4{5v_NIvDq9l6+1L45M-2)jHRS?4&1l zQ10G;Bp)fnCqIj@%aizJ$ceOr-=AnGJ9rz@yxEe=dPXWO^Z-6H`~|Jr(IW)qGm-IDXOj?jk<<1B6|k_0Yn9#-^pIag*yV}d6yyyc^^UP#xU1x! zLprpV{I5dp)&nW0G2)XSj@$gYJh6j%c^{x&%H8qQwEUrm{2anAPxQthuK=lcaLA4` zno3R{k^C6eW%d=H&xc2lfAT56-;s;mp=)gZ$&VuJ^2Bb&zfHx@f={_GegeEQkalIU zeyE}3>~Gob$*0_X9+7N?8qQK z`6Yy1p4d@^oJhTCtYd8{J3i)lzW5~M4~PQ%#Et>tv!0I;c6nmQ#}S|XuBdS3w^FG= z(VMu|`iJ~9!Y)tZhat}asWCBK2N%aeR$A#VezcY^tufs+3R zPko{M!^)2E_0|u}UkqWFCw4GC`*GSq`6Wtk4tmJ1Anfu)ZxZr4kb3!@+K!U*oFP3A z{S#z>^@4gRKdkHv-C*-geiUJsC-yNu^P%;!{6sGGGYdWBml1Y(qBj9~4M@Ey?uSuw z_9L!+lHL$J%6;RY33x=N$8&RHH_o<)uL{BZs8{}%^fKU4?z@kcz#~e0$#?uR+Yi)L zdPh-y%qRJjyZyP?(M5dn2MD`7NpB1}k$U;Pi)dmt-#o`f&+DFncE$QaJ(RomO|dTr zz2sLAc6nkSC`vven`vLOrfZ%2k z;3syZ5TE=k!Y)tjxCsQ>D=J+1HB@R)^fsV}{5HZaPvVy$?*XZo-w_!rInS5T?*m_r z^qCLpq5Pw`E+Fh{7zVy{+0Zd5TE=i z!Y)tZ{|Vx;{3Ynh-TS8K?LrUv1B6|k#BV@822yY2N}Ipv;%vUTu8l~38SC59iob!3 zF@NN5LGT_C;3sxh5TE=y!Y)tjeh>uaPgJ<_Whyl&di&5r{s>{0C-Ga5hn8mZ&F`(n zmHf*{hwVXvqK9&Kye4*J5uf}r!Y)tZ*B~cSZ|R6Fm$tHF8UCPN@+o)qiycE{$HZet zWZC+GNWB&8qfO#EES=#}_s@G1AjkAas1G9Mv4x7U=s;3-$i-F{c> z=pa7pK_6k4C;1pbPNW@OoHG|$nXUilA-^zZ8j|!<;8E^dhr{^nZj(NXhOo;MI~bq+3+=o4wB7 zPeM1%=I?u+d4k6vcgLM#M*{Jgzcj)wPwe<>#D6OCNjoTK|0{CQTZ10*n+Ur+(VK(3 z1Ek(0*1-*x`~o4E-(I~p|BD{V&!1kkf5eW+i)QYW+Zd9ATFy>7^hi(vAk!wU=<6^4EIopxhm|ia#65jyA$B zPwePHPGou|yk8zGJBl7VD8EAaBlhB1en($z0b0N_e!DLX6tzc--FQm@h(F8tOvB4a`!$ot^d$Vehy)m zC-zk!CsJ<<=Z7?veV4+H%Yo!mUUcMQM<4OYA0h1W#16)H%TeOTZ@2!T+!sFtUJ6LN z8kkQhDLMO%mpJx{9hAS?kx%PC;*;M-*yXwL?^5x{;8X64-vclFlG%EZ!@O5Q$yq;H z&dfLEmnb`Oh);e6VV5WQs6$Sq-qf}BKG9KjFkfsB+K*c6p*V3V9hwz3Cfm{u)aDV;Fj$5b+Z|ly6XIQ0(X-KKVn0 zU7j2Neic7!z2MD`7v5$ILP7>dhvp=BT=$+OdjYB}4P$iFpr`#960$vA5yZYGAG*oh?_X|#Xt{oqC92B!}|#Nl)L3E`4}KR`D27#p5!C^GMir_^@i~L zoWOO;Ka2{@dQAC8Ao!FB@Dn?7h);e6VV5U%Q13a6Y|xdv^DCma13l#T5q5bJzYh5b zDC$L?DBAuya?fnNXSs9SK|bZYzlvP!NFhG?S%h7lq{sNYk1~D(e9C?C%iy(vv@4RZ z`4}kqSA<}GEPwf5?4bM-5#T5J2xqJx$d4iH@+5u|a-ygZdHOlH|KU32izs;N)pB=y zEOykD9W8`io}|}>oJhTO*fCOe@Vk?G-#XuevVKwz%kvHq;3xJaUT*zFei~tyC-!mv z;~Yjd=*r#kk?5^K5BW`mU7p0xLEZt1dXd+$-*~9x+;7Kx3SZKTyu#*#a^HTtICw;+ zH(0Rcoxyd=KPvy2AN?c$i+#T%|CrwkEKL839aY39zk#sJllUJ;JkF0w(3RhW>jI*8 z06pZ75q5bJzYTf#-r0U2j`{F}l79+@(q2hV^!#@S9u@(9Vn+_~$*&;n@+AJ}K%l*% z!j-d}L@s(e&_jM7VV5WI>yVFt)Z4}T)yOMn^F0qcbbF=TZHHn<3h~L$BJA?Sjxyv# z+L6GxxuNWMy~hs9nQ!`|r|cLa?DE8p3FJiDk;A#rvHNEIahAsp%H94^{EgVFy6y)A~U<#~UISI|hhP{up7GCw4GC`yH+KdJ*6!dK0g* z{vkh&u*(y@VaRhpQ6ci$12%s(CFePEy8cqWLL&@{9Ua6czmKrXlk`TA6KO{i=VC`* zJzL)Ac*>h{w?7s;Qi#v;&LZsc#EvrLMB34~&HAIE?BF?tMDo)(54orKuk}1vy$kYt zL;-$c_XP1-KO$M{2bU*y=Mi7GBg)-=TJ&b1hx`)4E>HBvA+G|(G?9nPjIhg-^uqVsd=o{D$h&9Ta!KGi<@`RjUWY+D=uhE`9Tmi<+*eQQ z9y=y*D5b})Y; zm-NcuQSLj3@_rClPSi`eYoF+CLofL~gk7H4TZ4QEq~0#pZ-rkw+wSwQgYB4n%3b|p zM-uVL&mipb#Euf=MCz^JJ8^YoM+)cj==HcC^tA7fKwc2V_=$Z3=%xS12)jJ7k9ygk ziwaln-nT?=;&s+<o8LrEr~kV|m+7N=nY}KI{F3=XlEXDUjc&>}x|W z^W8((<%xaNtMg6yl}c~;XJ+#qL)hhs-XYRU;yUx4K>v_a^5aN{_LBcF zA4S;ZNqUTbjuYRNU+u_6Zx(vUFC*;oBz^+&8c@`TeDqw~kF=G%>lwHH5a}}?)bkU_ z*$yQr_D!Id{K%^HgUb^;evJ5g?Z$*%`OUa4AbK;(Oi$!u#{lukA0zDYB)xFK=9@^pb$st4f$NlWKILK&;3s-0cklmVM-K7H zuORI5Bz_%oqNo=67~j|EC_7j`muUp}l;7>h#f}l;@A21czFnTA$M`Q$@l)XM$vyF- zkY|CSM)YQ|j4@?!|Q zJkdKudP!WD_##i>J6bsA|KIHnmhBu->ST59a5`uS%06(#>0=?wd5q5cE-wp`uM@5Az zck?59`_M!F2w|5e@mr9Gj@tZF?+EkhaV38TY^OiTr`**qc4QHs{4&BWPwc2cPNd%9 zYta8IJCZk9xjvu&3ePz5D#)*b{Q_d&1bXTJNXh!a<%xY)B0l{|`zXIu>CHe7`6Yy1 zp6HE3UIkKb744{{+n}#0pa|pXU(Hn!j0u&V@k6>P`spPe%*?jBs#A2TFL*4_Mc;BOb%H4Tcu{-nz zn}7172)jJ7F9A7`ddt{`YXIde96jG+6Igw+4Tqm%u?~zzYDfoI%30#TP#k1)mv>i{9=oB zVDvWdfgND=b}LW6#9|-VPTO$h4vQ^d?M@pm-DNR>bsrO8_iigs&7tcXyJP-7NjWrv;QnXkHc7f@2*bPh_ zwc#Fc2<(=ud;sih*l-^>0+!!k<(UU9vLBzEZo?%bu~EU%%qXx4rj|BpvC$bMlY*<)(i_p~$+u&-%WDo4MUy=l5@0ICrFh{Vw`Dpb6;X z_aphe$k5$Z55EVw_r1`ZmGe7}jjRp(zL)F!u4ohI)A4(`QRt~+Ub2C6r1%}(KAv+! zYc@UoUEK)wy|rG9>-erFzqiZpm)1G|7Y7gTQ}uUE`JLS;-gELhyZqj13g2DicXm^l z?}#B?es`DOo$TTqyAj4u*-LEt34Gs@-{Wn=u2IZh=l6N}-AR65Reztih4*bylyhxw z{>s-TaPk8|#pINQd8Z<##E4-}U8pC>zkv@BH$6ll=Z` zl>1EJj}hiE+t0K1>+b=F-)P%Q94O60+TXcoCq#~?UY0*z+$rY^MO+tyttj zd-#1?;`vrhXp{Er>~{#FuLpf2;Gcf%ZFm2V>pt~&(D&%Qh)?AA3Hg0LekYFKY2)|F z_`NQEPipUbPS{t#@8R&f8T>8)&*kTN@;r~7=b7_-@4fT2(ckc#W1cgd!g;(rFP7(- z@*GZ{^T=}+dCnovALRLeJU@@;u@cuo(`k>R;9JYR+9jqn@^ zo}bXT$m-*MaPDK~eqZjZ<-SzzgX6w1?)Txo4({XN{sXSx=elgJx8{0Rt{3Hc%e{4U zn6Kgb0KRYM`(VER<$Ku%{KEH&e1FIHJ)Cdnd^P96I4{Kc9?q-q`JT_aeE#F}o>WtL zUWuNt?J5aGJ@(!w*R~4x?rv{v9^G#i({{@5IEN}$-*?*oQ2vYC-}!dxd!zhge#Ej3 zhF)1J#>!jAHVP-Nixp06Zx=UrV}*P zR}|Ne6)PJL70(6lhC(U7ZEDF4+qkl^d-BTi;n+?oKexCPJ3K$PGQYa8SeRSSCsz_n z$-+`HUtBJ(&leWg*5{M!iQ;;GZFSxVlFRdJ%gOxWYJO>XZDncYaDI7l`SFsu;dn8> zX$sLvE}5SzrUi@ zcn88qV!PWXil$XheZ94AyB%r1rt$6OH;#$p%~k1rO!vv&@G9D9eKZZh-#%aUPHNjdF(cjKSTmQx8N;!%XU6J^ISq)U7dVJSam&5mheCyZ{}hnl;z8Re|m zffD?8V$<9&O&_4f6V@!#W0y@=yEhuyF23=^#&%H*bv!2ZjOPGWe|FYiEH`3y-_9LV z5ZltdNLRBXwSRj$tTE;pk<>UDGQGf9W=dB|bJ`P`Q3*yT_KvVwe0aa^IYyau#4bJ$ z#Q*86T^z3wPr|Mvv7=_B7(0Gq$5ie$lh2LylQI_C_kl^!*fVw8&hFNhsrlP-V>3fc z(`gphUSNAzX#}ygjh(`=tsUd>b;(n4f8=^{zt0W6fAPGyuCn_9*h%~ugkLf3;7y{& zhv-dBva2VpHK++v)%G$a<4oLDIk28O+*C%XEgRdh)x4>_8=FOXRs6|w+baKT)}OD3 z9mLnspAVUPOn%jjVcna|o;R(*(jJWqO$i&Da4WiQI*7D}Y@Rs2YAUH|URwogs~IQI zDqGGxcPH|5vv&PD>>&Oc!jFHymsb1A;?C}i&0yBtkuuv`k3WRG;ios)GWLq!dG1b2 zg7mfJY1Pkfn}?R;#odj9k!@@iHp<2-(>zSKBt4PTwP`PT{jPENwA+F3 z#HQ&gw|7iOfG37c(?`Y%$MPG;XUv@Xhv%Gxety=@o6oR@5?_SyZT@a zKeSPN_{#F$xL|p4&5V^74zJA@63fN>@5%hg2El#!TgVp|7FL!Q=jMycE5*c; z862+8Cl^)<3(KoZ#r)x=^`!abR~F~Y#d-4xwX{@RonKmAUQDddudOGaNYV%TiKR93 zyqcU}PpmGl7Yd2Q!m4?^H0dqREfo$guFfA`HD=5&n+LRoVsdG1F|kxwS(`K2PA)7b z=2q7J?XN{71Y5;m7yi{&Unzr%(TT zIeMIS`2VRYIrXggmHQ5J@0j)LN8x)S#|4k?*L=BbrXVr1_loJQw0N-TIde)s)d7Lz zkNcN8|J!W-c91{fHo`|X%@7(7^D-2ZnHLNN%`EElCXB)0YSGLN6mOh9uGt~D8Kjwk zqui(W#%(v6M*^8d$ea6ydBWS9#CcdIJ=fOuru6p91N&hb@0_*wLey*G1y87+Zxm<|ebWlwZuRF3g!uKCx`3NYmbv$F)(rcY@H$6Z`M-gwun9qg}& z(I;N6X1MxlGi2O4A>;0&X0qY`SA}cJOWHTrr^o8Eer=;XiJw6D@%yj+IeK$reHEwk zpGceeDUH&mR!cs)p1Jbw*?g`cU&I2!_BoeNi}DJVlt=V`djjzi?9b zU~00;JOk}@d!_tC8(Z5>6&L%sPB-^Uv-WYmh4=>8cVs$&V|rM5i{j~FF&$*5Sj^+u zLuMQrGw-2F<{8(#E|DoAX^qU9rwK08hG#x<~O2xv1F*E0V)G>2fU$~w%^qv_z zAAKh5B98DLtBLn3So1$obp?kv>%W$W(;zWTiW;&ngzm=Gkr(97(5L-Hu^V%@Qp zb3Krja~;4r)0FKW(VxTmc+Ib2eTSBF9f8)@9~t%vI^w7iOSMOshn z^}+t(x-ZQSqkOgg7VOdd2-f3he)T26{%N2bwVvD^!F;Yq)BLWd{*06) zw7lujQ$hcx`Dv_Q)N+2`PRqG&Qp>rXN&6wS=J7M?q1F@fv|p~v)O@a+(&=*jrsi|~ zrj~QvmDa;`o|@mmxTF&*TTF&pa zXnE7q&!>F#AM4Y!Kl$Adt)J^*56H28R?C~7`cp%D*XeRSoR(KS_XVDRuhZpvT`iB} z+!d{#>+Q6h>wUGJA=bBQ{simlv^?c$FFCB&)%u%QSFGh(taH}-dA_-pb6v95)ARJV zJl9+EdCs<$^W5tL@|%PE6Ruy>cJf?kt%vKVwLI~ z39Q4`^45L9_D3+T*7bzz;I$sEi`Vjrr~l`9Y?`0&^#57xC(!nA-M!YsbJnz+>+`jo z=b>qN7xh-B%XR&lpLw?Rr{;70zvhRq??CgpE?CPao_@H4eo5=+xnEiyITCCq_a$h4 z%5$HppjJwJUOP{h1ZIFGU=`Q^wt+q15I6xwe#PpG15>~(unepLo4^jR4;%qQ@3Z=% zzyvT2%mFLFI;Z?s2{7`0~lz#OmwtOHxXE^q)G1H&Ig{((tg23P`Cfem0A*aHrM6JX>+$UiUz z%mT~68n6lM0QO%UElyX28MqX`3EL}8DI%m1vY?fU=KJ1 zPJoe*ApgJ=FbgaLYrrP31MCAwz)%zU2PS}NU=COT)`2Zx7dQZpf#F|6{((tg23P`C zfem0A*aHrM6JX@mk$+$cm<5)BHDD9i0rr6-VCbXBKQIAI19QL%unueiyTAc(3=IDZ zW`HGN71#i_fj!_5H~~g}1NjH0fLUM}SOYeJ9bg|g0*3x2@()Y^)4&|C0;~gD zz%FnA90S9@iTneTzznbitO6UrHn0aA0w=&o3;748fLUM}SOfC?PYCyqrXx4^tH*dB zB!+SSx^?S#+3W!0GLETK-am0aUFH+kju(F^ectifyB-pP=$meEHUAUOo5l= zEn7j%8kgHQ@7P@5a<<8a+;$!Nq)jjKuO7Vm9dEerB@#UzIwMrW^D4`U2=!BtcEDl~i|M~3a`+~|T;``F)dxegQul?uC zKi?-zRD9ik`Qr0^L9#QOf9-!?{yD#2QSo*C@zp=R2k5Byy8L|Yhx7lFQ^fc6ADkag z{?2Uvb@}`J$NBGyim&@`pZ_=?-Z@2lpZ%P7o~ZcRexLt1pPKy4Z2q*<=fzYT#g^!GVn6F3CM&>!Z2P2dn1Lw}J2Hi1K64DBfgYyyYC z80uRN*aQxNF_cFR*aQxNG2}M~YyyXlALRa+MSdra-1z4))(4_F`EmNYZ+C-RRYNk) z;kiB0-?im?-Gv`~QS+G>Ot<5U9-g;D+v%|;6m zxn9sLsy9pNi)+>(cQj|8tNPG826lg=_u1XyO}_`dk3#JXO#OSI9e1Zcw_pE7&gU>K z4`E(b%VSvYqvcJkH_`GA=D)R^=M-r<&n?pO;asr&T>q%~T>q%$UA*_u@*dWaX*thN z((*RW`_}Ra-kWJT*IjBk*Il}DQ$HSMy&@*oKmFTZdyXyEX?fy2-N@%>%QJ)b=vrRF z_iEjAL{AOlKP?~TgZ<5QpPFAy1oQXKnNszxb+w0&b!J*W*Oh8H&#%&Qt}E5@9Nw>J z`SA2$dpN$(e9lv7`2g?NwVdl#wVdl#wVdbeXn6zYb7^@7`(d;^i}!_EKJm3FI~YFABDk>yot|p8KZdam*WNIoB&|c@^_nTF!Yr zEl+v+AD&mE`8Hjd_FDDc*)tL zFRb;1Jokmf(}K&Z9?-wZxQ^pgBFC#QKe4sTL79vXd0+4Sdwc(W?OXqDcdO9s2}krC z0+~pCJF;UL*F?`4@grZcdVcbgzq&1c&sQ#ko=45jk?D`faYPb)xhUfRp6ioUa;~G- z{^EI#THf-EGkET!=JOm#E$2FYE$?~y$A+h!)I9a9>uHCakI?CI{!hyXp8IIkQ!jg1 z2c+9=$I~B0FrL%taz0VZd48srmpuJ`{VBoqyX;Aq=PT)Y!hH`qU7q8qF6Xn7p- zvsym%JeQ?C^`U)dusx|42FtlGM5oJhS+$(!U}<^AlP>p{X#U8PU!DW2`P_G+<=l6o z<(${k@-)_)YkALepWyx#&F^}~Lp--u^M^-*{onAki?CK{v<7Ld&av_PdiF^>Q(xNVE=HvfKHeDpR}C&pR~O7^kDrwpIY;|UrNh) zj-Hm6J^gJ8=lp9v&)e7XlBXZ;d!C0Q&kL?^9lW2^`p2lZTF&>8THg2E*Git}x_-bo zUdF>b=kI`iPyONfdYaGoOIptTXIkFG{s1lK{xdBfVEwO_b6=X4^SnJR?|H`UolAqu zi|=!_p2;o2{20~|Yktd9fB3#v^P8UgX38V4Ee6}ebKJH5kf$Hx`(w@L`R`hu^OPgc ziP!w9htK!UnxFRE-)N-E3ujM?KP|M?<`PPod9_~BTdg`A3wsLWBzGCxMuFHk{6t(``La?3+ z`c|Ea(1Ct*7bnf6vpdx!yzT348dFOM>m;x(}^~>p8TX z-?h;4h-aLcJm03P>*v^$-@0cWpZidCx?DG+1i+A&#LuvKdY7xJN){m@#@{m@#@^-x;g_Vf=`Pd}W(cvY7R_f>2C zDbF}I<{5v+Jo66|UwL`z8_z}6_Hci;mUDl$mUDl$mUDl$mJdARims>JdH$%LSK)qc ztv}{@UPxg6NAr0Or`FGP@tQyJJXa1p;}fov(|Qt~=e{1E(=~tSneXDhbIs?zb1mn( zJ1ytFb1g638r(lrJ@#}x&mHwc!FooX@#@I)Ji>kL+D`6k*Yf)7g46AIo<|bsSG6AQ zd(iUcT(JI#r=Hh5@0*&QeqiFc-*r6W*qrCS!}X5Zey&&4a_;BQ@)YjlTF!m>TF(6+ zTF!m>THf-^t8l-*=68MdaQR@l$a_$(=OprdXrZ*V!H@UJd(g_#=cntVqJL@MgTD09 z4?OmT)xTes_nSt~qgv)cW z=2txP$vj6v^Z6Y-EgyKwvFh=2#nax~*9Y4l^W>|%9?VaA?rT|(oaZ;_d{sTq1+mu# zrd!glB&wVQAX^%W7L+goo#?Rwt1lN;cAy}Tle7hdM zaeci`cj#$f3D12w?(tjMGk(i?#_c?}L)#Pb+`k5%cE@u*w4T1FeYHK$WjRl}O^<)7 z9{nLte))Y*ZD+$X4;J&h7aKn*xZHUzvo814%Yykl??l^ExhI%k_Ow&(57ByfZps0< zXWohDrf7c3Q~w*D`oMEmw4Ts>aK89`Rn1S~oH;G8Uly!q=;;T>p7(Jf&vO~iuh!}E z+!rk$z9!h7oTuEwhlBY%4@N(y^E?=xZgnnL55G^V`3cW_V8qkU)II%4%#$ykPovZA zd&UDf&;4cOc`oL6cD4Str+m2|N%Lc#ex~Gkk2dhslQ5nWb$Ri89i48@bARav*e~Px z2o^LFa~LmFfOTLC*aZ%NV_^8-+2@5AFbT{6OTa3y0c-<%z#(t~OkiI|8khrCfOTLC z*aZ%NV_>)o`+!Mc23P`Cfem0A*aHrM6JX>ER&N}b0%n0_U=7#=c7T202pIaJ)fWXO zfN5Y3SOM07EnpWo0FHs-FCqWHBrpRk0jt0Uunp`1hrkIi@_WcXFa^v4%fK423G4v- zz!5O?W#k{20H%RCUL1WtgFKS2J0DPR^@2G)R0UcYMR)BS23)lq?fMa0zkC1<0 z5|{y&fK^}v*ar51L*N7$`D5fCm;z>jWnc~11a^RZ;0PG{6XYM50H%RCUrrhr*s8CU~0fgNBUI0AjWnc~11a^RZ;0PG{ zGvptb0H%RCUjWnc~11a^RZ;0PG{56C|-0ZapPzzVPqYyrE#0dNcqe+T&oCV?4X30MU-fNfw8 zI0R0Bk^hMN15>~(unepLo4^jR4;%qQ-$nj`31AwS16F`_U<=p<4uE4|_%D!uU=o-C zmVi}Y1K0-kfJ5K}7#Sk}z!WeGECXx6Ca?qS14qEn_mF>J0+O0vo_Kum>ChC&0)Lkbhtbm<5)BHDD9i0rr6-VCX+1 z|G)$=4a@;6z&fx6>;ebCF);i$$UiU%%m7QkDzE`;1AD+BZ~~0{E%Fac0kgm|um)@b zJHS401PuKbTKSch4 zDPR^@2G)R0UVDdhb=a~#c zU!1Af_aGmFmJnh?=-#UK( zZQl^G*u(Qrh&%Ft?5ikOpy;2LBf{LL%KQ+8$Ddm+T>niTkzB!PxkEqCKOm2&`Lvts+sGrjd?P!M z?>_t!I@9_o0n7mwk94N(y!>X1qEGTkc@*yxXfIKC{7w0Y z&-q>Qh~x?y*@6Ax(X&twfWnh}@%(@>@>3xX{hd!A?H~TuY`z%g`dr#a6n*@;eyHF* zJb6TN1&!=LzQ(XOcF5*Wc#<#f%kANM2G@0YasNHB|3O>tBOkJu0G5Guprj-AlgIrW zw3{eA{-*gweD1R$k4Ubd@R>gMWs*nKeA>@*SI8r3KJ&x%o8%E)zL7mjKM{xUYvgR} z{}iwcYyw4(lneLqHW9Cn>$+Uneu(YQ+w$lGMW6VGa-L&KyNSZ%Pxy?__0HrG$rUuR z1NAKzw)w0Bg(vyq`uHT|U7*ev*C`RBzh?851ZIJvSL~&n=cLk3qVV_=KJ{_EAbCV` z1%=P_xGs%6qRTh31M96)=U9J~flZ*q6TfiXQv~upQ2T}B3nK5&q37H4vFZ<6YyD>U>2N;;c|>vrh0pZ4{)jxH=GS2#&zT^PsQJtn_ob0X)O_Zj z`!>iUx_l!$FwQ8SYs;?*>;psRS$P7O1ByN=SFQ((gI~vWU9LQzoLI*Fvxoal6a90A z{RrC4i0upd2TuC3F06_1P3TG1PO(eIvm9UZyz}&r{?lduYW-W&+k|96j;r@;5Ks zl?ZR!lU1m>yjU~Un1`lcjtEtB_Wxg=;!#t+;j*F_JX zr-*#6G9^^p+%d;u3lTrj7k#qzOA>heE3f$%x0JtdjZhv>U(utl1U)t2oiBOmr>o!i zhkp=#COy$P{b>}TksY{C4xr~$DDfkq)Ar60qCS3anyAzLe>yC7Nqu6v>8I?s!(`~t zo}Bl&3G$x=kM(cp#1nno&pL7B;%}Be)06c1GqMBqJ{{S&N3L@mL8Km{=yL65y)8ix z?XDrL?dJZY_9@cU<*(DFzd}z%eLjW1xIR1%zUUJ_a^JKo7e7+Jn{SCDzaT%=p_eGU zAV0O0y*@wj9H41Zx;!{{Cs|+ zoY-^p2Kj5G?DY97e1#n!hA-H!&tebfcbJ~F&i*yB1MMN}#1FEkg6pTM=iFD)aP)~i zm%xB0YR|}tA7oGX!r5~4`G@P?MMqOw4RQ0Bec&Dm2JP)!D zzW7({rC*8cXCmMw9DY!F#GXD|PkiN(#QZ`Ad`VyG3HQb8dh!$@m>)3#zm0%7^j{TV z1ns#2Yy(rM=Y3!f^`Qcs0K>4W25c%jJGg J%qI_q^$i&7Ix+Wh*^NaTR?rUfOk*KxHeV&jw@-uouF<<-^Y9mAot~C#CS%JsOhBk8mJh`JnU2kjjC%OUJ5?=r579w~3056pB$ zZvOYS^Ntf=?22Q*jKmYW`ncZwT{~Y)yC$cwD}0&F57TEk6Loph4%$tW_~K8V*G>5& zzxVbp$~F0k-MlVgu{(qG>pPrProyho?7 zYvSk?yLb-Y6SXV#%>DWzc15tBpLS(&J<_oE1^TNBxzAs9N3ZyW^^d6QA?={uM6pBc z;(ig@HGux?-+pGMKa4)h=ErAO9M?sU*v0xqWIdxj!jtrQ{;7neyvop1`_b%uxN(Z~ zTTc2?UOe~L&2Nxhyibgs_+l6L!O^a8%;vv+&a7V&ko)|S!gbLj>9d@Oy1Zxy?Iucm zv5Wg%BrN`_L4T$_d%y3U!mfd`i{(UQdC?xG&vR*+e(VbCm(-7D+gBQLpI@@LE_$TA z`2Nq$ulS4h5LsSLC%*WF`|oI1hw1;_Z2KBg?z~r&IPx=kLSsj-q|b69>hhu;w3`Th zr*U77gr&Ta&$j+*y?eI2Dv7WOb;x~wX*zl(eU=kZmly4z-9)iN z?Bcn7v}*+Y+3(M``}lLLKYVs2ab5HT`Gw_0dxR(H^SnF>OL%r~c%1+TEbtK;CyJr?5Nx+U3_2nMD40M@x?BFcZYU0aXs?A+5W6|3cCi5Uhxa-A5qss+CjUCVu#d2o(D|% z%4h!TugW#~iQT*|VJYWW-1;*IWI0z6_W84p>!Qb`<*kRbS9sI$JkC#`edm4t{ddYW z`H6kp|0-dzZ@_e}v3AnF7{WgL61XmUq`Y~~Ez=cwkln0@6(_#f#q%g7p4e5#_2Esw zGt=*MPGMKi(JSe*oQb-;X$S2liXGxlo|i)TV~<_IPrpt5$?LQ`@;vLu43PdTBkc2M z71u?NNy}T_v{!gyAHN4i`)(ioYc9c@+Q;j{7r*w9&RE$Oxz^h4voD70qDRV`=hiV@ zkq6n$@-8{?r}Yr)&?KJNRmJtec(%M-r?9Kz=#}(Y&O}|_w1ajN#SXD6tmY9y*IB>R z|4QBeAouwzgX^L<$S=H)&>p7G?@&ls{L+A)@pESTp&BdGUK5ZhnL8VtGZc zxA~@BJZFn`C2&3Y$Fp{2A@}*E!Qb`)1DKpJ&BH_!2-T`^p*|HAD3Hx0S3yt9s8NuT9R)a6Y( zXg5*p5P$L<6v{vSiPwHsuE|gQ$?Fmpe>Rc+5J-Q95|3Zr5nLBNCM|Dy(_Z0;eLQc3 z_GM1ir{DUN>tY|TOIYm7BAqIb_BBsoU)!-y%A4x}nXc#$vYX{SapH?z{N4=hiX687 z$^Fdi^H36UUwNl-o#{VM{xLsd7VjTon2+xOGnlUqV}7;;OkrMg0&H-e5A#<&U=H&- zLtq8-9uYj}*MV_7|8{{XJogQNWjs%ffi*lYq%dwC0xKMkV*JztmN@>v{j~$k;yyJ7 z*3dtP(GN9&S+wH`u+H{{@)`lFj-O5WhZ=aVRd?j3{2$}{DI(`r?s$bQ7x`=I?cO@8 z$ht^2|I(Y^An6%< z4~71yI~~`#^(Z0j;lJ7b#iTj?`A{xOzPr%x>JfYS{*B1>Vfk{o$Pb^1ow={s^uh}^ z-`~CB8Gkwd=C6NB^ou?d}7l{PwGw3cSwTbDSsd0_dF+#KI8B6T%Lq$ zzr0^gCLCh9i;a>F{YPZ^vfL6cw(mVNOV&@lzqj)_5?}1+cQbOhE^Zi^D#tuR2<&4 zAGpw#Ll@V{Z-U4AA^vjf6?r1(Pp<29c}-BtmHi@df^?$EeSZY;Sbta#M4yy1=c95? zd?P=Hex$#IZ_58%)*A`CerNeKp{L{M6CU+YZw=Rb4sY5{|HQV_B;?dPM%eY|w4Hrp zwq1)|qNnw3+dt`a8J{S8qbHPGvHnx-?p)Vjk`G-zb;N4{MPE=q*Wq<1VbMo_us)>0 z84qyNM%{@i*-J-jApbRDQ?Iiyns3Qy_-?f1oFf8+X5 z%8lR29yt1p-_E9gsh9Q0&7WKE_UwOw^+OaW_5{_t9@0xWJn?V&-`jfB#C7T|f#;?# z_E**Ygz3?4mS-37b$RAge5N-DNY5=#@+3X}g32rLLhBE=ybRB~o_%*~bvot|ohH4# z+i?YYE@}PZg@5qQA56zt;;+cpXP?{XAC02VEeF;|-p|$e;6VA0kv{c`K54IA$fGye ze2RS9PX5%|#d2VMVtgX>oIxIua`IfcksY}2^Zto=hnnBD^{C_6CGEt$ze+vleU19Z z;4@v(Cw}97lI1?2-WToXTl7&6G45O!UGkHDNvE3uPp3;B(`_Q%ilaBEy*2~%x#iV! z;s^QD9ZyI*qd&tp@8?(IF`q>CFO~n(&hxnUDbbVtkG5P=jvgtOQh9&eBmSN)^fSI< zzRTd(oOqINwr{52z;*3M>LJF#>neTJLmWBRr-g^|)9FT1)-O6;@|Z5mFA2Wrl=`5@ zO}PMl#!si!oOt4Yjz5TFlxy4J8GoMBL_1|Vw5L1E+Z(^}dJXk$F`{8=x3&vad^^?^uJ^4O9u9nR{_uUxAD(;qc_>{wD?u(6~|lF&j;`Gedrmg zbccUq)8%s_%W)i#ZqR+fwM)v0VPg80eZNV4Xa7ilaNO*UXWaH%bK(c-=lx#tE$xoq zr|Qkd^X`Yb?~cvgq(nA9_dXQ5)!JSEAF1@&g)e_wu1h&3PT2Ww=Ff-1mvT}4btnzJ z6(IGFZnEny>6gdTYpxyev+jSQ9b2w_Cmr!W`*)@@#&zBg#2)c~6Y}tj_sdVxWql{s zz)LthsrPZn*{?Ib^ek`hIg-~$D7UiW>GsU_+E6@>zuA7+4|N@$+pb5BJScx{*b}*J z-w%)1uHz0*>I=)E1U<}W20WIt_&umx`Mia4ImGYixz7!9f1qBX+nyw@{M`1(cHV;> zLuGdr^H43w$q(Od{h;k;eIU|qcRVQVbNmHcFWu)qu}ha*4e7Y!HSuSg@o{~xoCEBV z^ct7j@!4#82gm(P$IVxeT@$1edC7i#5W7O3N4}I@N$^~~LFLTxvy_wA-TX_d?}?VP ztKThW`lk&$ddluD(y2pE{y4zy>3!!d`}ZA5hxLv1Bb~N>(f660=RT7K-?cx;KRM^Q zE$BMOWAxt$?<@PzFY=)B9OF96pFDk^;&WX1j@feW{XXkyXpY^SSc=RLFsejR?qsKM9fOMw)1kOcQ{yWsd zeUy4cztlhWb41oZJs#en|9?8Uzb-`z4su$5}e+l z(D$uh-STqlA?@uWzV7#8h_CZE@}!qTJ3m!=sk^Ozbb3|9*Xd=!cZze`|7S2ip!GY@)zXyHthlmSIU{|V3-d5J`S+U9shG2$utG!I{O)xyS~o)?2E74g_EsmyW_rO zV)|v)-z8uT*aAxW;y3E0U2JEre(^`{8FswTLwwew&^-t1{gjV#eIos|>mTZM(>MPg z=vO$7sv&*JkMviGuLjqD`j`6qi0Ag}Vs{qn;aa#({wN@y(!S%rJKLXHzaDJgsf_iL zZr@=QpY<#YzUv3cAMKkRw;dcOwh=#~#x)W6C#S|^Jx_Y|(}Tu|`{}XX#9nUmr~S$I z8hnpHeiD40zsQ%Km_O@?ujg~e>i)*^YXzrwc1H1iEk z>K{zp$JjoJJg3IKmwu)5R({&goL2r>TV741|ApP!(ht`^^cRvZd5-Txp2c|MAAaLU zXKtPTkzbPQCcOjgjL*+R;YmFlLr>&h>leyX{e$Hv?J9=v+tVL>{$-dbdc+R;gQ&+5 zoIl`vE)jNwO0cWp*eCrz%ZE6?^&a168U@lXGF{f!F?g<>LF16|w;7~c0$=hcJo=BkBzW~1-hThibURE}6yYcOSih*RhVmWG=-Y4idpykVh40(1 z2cnPZk;nOlgyPY^ERQnlr^A!_Q%%@pLydN;$ z5PJsSu;Xv~jrpY=L~*gC!|^bY?TPhRcqYA2@>SN4C7{S9y)x2c{h;5N4#UEi^e89l z_R)g=fs>BJqkTlqlNCHM}LxEr(b4x`|XJOLfPPU&UQ&&oIGaG_%Epa#*l6XeDSl4i!PRb z%#ZnY)C87u(}^$TR1c`X=J|2&JQUGwbRH=8-jD73o5`%cz4{rxf4|%%KJ6lQ{(k@Y zRO&VBTUy0qJtKx6v+;cOt?I;=dF08L?0Q4Vhxqjh`N#a|uNL@SC!W;5XIa|ba~SQu zT*>=RJkig1tS=>8pD3Qz!}^za&A#76-=#>8`V!ESo#CBvi1mQ=s*3BhThz$?i1P;I zwa9abk}i4l(-7s{chZ%9r~M+^?=rd%C4HHfh<M7&8sF3;`Q}bmamvpX{fAEuZw4J?KJ?HUxVBpBbFVsW7v~hjn@T5NTeMRJT`{gP2 zg*^6ML*onv*;ks?vu9t$k&AuQL;Etg-f(zgAKz279eI%dlej)`cqW~__Y_ybZq}#q zEH9+5H{hq}>-YU4cC#L^-etf`IXtmD26@SmOFhh8VCy06(B;dpm>ZPO@J~Gb3hLRw zNl)t2jmS6kQ9m*IGyC~7cAv-dx8jam@=ZM~FV?5D!;^foKII&_`<4>-${Hcf61m!xP6N0XrygkZ!J0jnE#aFGL(!df>^qPL^T$ZndgYBT>7%U!3}^Q2eCcjr%)UTi%$e zN9e~W_&Q%9-&Hof5=&!)$G)dJF!d~w_>>6m`#wAP>5aq#e3ThF?;ylwq~ z-}?F2$@S@d0D4a4_sE8|Ywx~q;=6uhJs(0}9DGSf>fh*3gY%IAPy4NnbFyadPY3Ti zEyRDK_noe?D~0t1`o1#?u*=wZpkL-ZW662XCVu6*3)inf@qPE_&d=F>?$tN!*9W;j zbKJr9&h>My|AOx0UFezR9lSrcz#Gk^dvLy(>qR0Dy7nEMFD^k((&0_--}s()3fGyR z9C)ss!tegr)?@N`U8B@Dacqa7V>bU$prjwvE=I5? z874!`vdZ* zhhd`dWjw=i9PJZ1e{!AULF(Z(L8I$HyGb6me#-)dCwi!#=-MHA7$!EI_)@<8?rcAU z^u6!Zwu|NM+w(iS!sAc;7sENN6X<_r>j#lLHokbLa3r1hrnSF!%YOYA``HijzCfLV zLH6gMhu8W1P2@UxJul1sq0Ljo-N60$y<++CQf|8E3pDX1b^J6`zg5PlB$-M3rmbN$Errn&kWqoWp@kBr4 zv7A!4-d8-Whx5AO@_znBALoCmFAP128QvL(m>=4e#dX>(*%5tup16l{sw#ba|3ZB& z>T?vDayyUn$?pCblg{aE*Q7Ug?6_#+q!SCBaRzz3|3u!npMR+roX<)+a-;J=d!>HK zr^L%)yi-0!ywO|s$7^nWT24Ii+f}02{8$ckT<U2EOH*KYUbKOLUt_ z^b_Yp`wq{o2O~!=>9YKZHC&JE&g6Hm9&nzX?Jz#e+ndMd^$7H36z^*IkM|MIn^$Ie zr_ujilz$iH*K~NspHE_X^e6K}9>%X9eZe z11~enJ20=vbrcncC;1CQPt%dhxGog2<2u^Q`2qToDA|(n$};lDc7os(>z@Qr_@al08ZjN$4$;FfvEsxx`8|{h7}trM<1qJqi1Z`3I)(=6AI<9DyAMqq zx!8RN^sv1-Y6JVHL}kBzh#ibC@g#h+qd@FpJ0zA7zv}3b^5%H2?#M;oywXSi5&I6` z_1Dmmi=Mkrp(lEBKVM=G@7r-lE_&{A^ho#~CmfXD9O9Q9J#K!hj$HJy9*J5Bzx)*X zyNKU+^oahw@vkEnefKJT^yB|U*|&hbc9i92^KY_4w?MogQ3TSntxc`9DW#B7DygM5 zfQ1wUf{3J+N)SrJO;UtoKrT`A5Je=YXuJ}Sx2We5MKFM3yvNJYD5CKK1`bFLDh97- zeVO-N>zi-Q`jh5)+S&h__q%^HYu2opSuD%1@cqE?a8+FwK2JA%7+;nh;8XWwjE{SU z-!l}yi2p@1RWJPz>)F1>s9z|YjF+hw+cWKYD){sIO3?{_(y<*hS^rImKLls_aJ*bI zIQp6V3gFlFa3^`jn|cjUPrXHLk;^;uq!b`I|vMQP(3s+>3nZp8@I@894g2hx)a` z$+(~VIQ}oZDzRVM5yx>=bzSslp0lJLlq2fvcHU9+;;(1IJ}E-}m?*sV$4p(9ydWRO zXNdZh!igSy9@whuAv>C=Fa6iV50RXB9BA*CRUdbTacd$^n(%ka!=2=Bfc=b5ANBFX zPE;@UF|TM}34A9Wzq9fEkhmr8b4!DxT=pX~;C2Sb``G6}PtI?Zzd7-X#PM0Emm=iP zF7T;-5YHuj!|yi3FXFlXv79Tsge;)gY!cSh>^em?sO_uO-D_?;!= zLVKh-y06{)^!j_{?gAg`Lq2j@{La5wR$iOf9qF03^ZG(3dH!7a2Yw+weZz;(H$!z@ z_`HlvqB6v1q4452j@MV}y6}04;v;{*T>UM4+5T7-U+3&BqZGLC=krNbT^D|LD}M6# zi`3sC{$0@b6(7xisICjY=NWzx&;5_(QsE^o^ygY#7e22#z^C+jFTSxqE9$!N`6k6j z{{Ck5cgWs0=(~!KwzsdY3%^$%;5P?8%YRG5@A-o*iMD5{Qa#5_%A`fR(ym%p9i<k;rekQ*X_;o$pN&YUQ*9i60TdGAa z^ML$ji0j4d>*3Pl|I&X;{6tqv+<0H5{sr)@E4(}>aQs4C2ldPo;VJxxqyIUM9vXfe zUy|P}gCB9^$MN=B@soJ2FwQQ#DX~-HN&YMs7?;n1uPVI6b@Kv8PdwXqL*Zl`&vT0G ze*7MA+AooQ`N|)r*L#S+tehq2?K;JRp{GAK8S)x9pYG85A+D3N{UDz^D5pMjerchU zc#Ge8&Su}go-YLChuRmPm$|+SeDgeCZ)NySK9KgK_;(Pv9+JoXre>Xa{9MrZ&Ln?? zZ|6w9JeQK|Sm+-w=p$xG5P|I4Uv7@Xz9aZ}&m9^k~q>m3THpLn?R`J+qJ+x+}&!*2oq>ehuJ7ocM+QVA%z(>)}rF_l16xJIatt9OYKQZ|?C+);|(g0&Zh) z_kmpEa=;b8TgNy3e!7Nw>z8we-yH3+t@uTGcV?je4(0a*bW??s{+8!|(ofWTu5i-d zHqZ|3y6FvY%xh6s+U@jyZl2}Py4?C(oL`Pzm)infaet{?A%-uhu1kSF?ef8FWF{Y&(3=v=ZWj^{hCJpH`5-uF0v+4Ew?W`8N$ z#{hWihmEb7#)V;nTR_}0mY46KyXS6@wKcO5a{vnR?SKz<(<;43COQXbZ5v$brb`H9_ z!b!WV-00}256hOqiC_6W3j2M7K5$C?eSE1u`SE-nd(M9j=e6*B9^Q{u0lwl_n}3WK z<i7)_^NO6m-*BHUfUt^+BnDCk7GK2$Dm)_lEgv$#_!ycp8Cx)c^%0U9Q9|MxG!jK^qQle zwfjIf8G20@>2adSqa6CX{(Vkw8=uW*`t6kX7Vz2+;Z9v7VS zBU8v*qm=6+Z;5@8wC9jKwmZtJKEm0p<010O-|wzBQBvOc(at``>oj?CAJOv<;&+Zq zD1Q$AJl9R+i2Nb0FOB@g1D$-@aY(*?o)G!xML_hU{QBFSo!plqbt1or>rIq$UHn}< z>*UjpL-O_Wg~;bPkMif>&wZ z>39f^c}`q$?DY3>$#V?jyMw$M@J?=$x8yeguB~v=KGxVz+Ce?}4g&JU&VJxLHn~0z zTo3t`{$y$W%NbR{WtP-=$qLe(c|ysMr0X%zx4UZ2ukL{O6_gdBMXVF1hc~ zPdoT&X7r=qiCY7=Rygs0+xU(46n;1zfAMqqnJ&)`o!`&~z3-1if9l8kb`N;*yXZB3 zx4RG9`}R0PulYxhyKnD6Z|~c^tDRkTTvhy$upe?C4$EUZqTf59*XLmE^A+dPQl8i? zdBy&Q^b^qAbBsn8oW5+IS*7rmJl=p$>KvMUEEA7Iv|IF)afsd*CUK#E7@x+EIX-qD za3SM+S}owU9MLOx56+d9IC9=p=S{>j^?b&04Er~+OX&HXlO6Pt>tY}KC$|6ck30MH zI7|0?^dHX?uK`bf?Dyz5jvLzs$9np84ZQ{mw~yaD{q{!rQ{c2;rG3@We;k@GDZInk zY3EDYpttiSW#Fy6xj8>W{2+Sdg8fpuzvpw8e_u%YOWHex{0U0>n|>s&hx(<$?fX@u zC-FPrtX&oJTxaDmUz!u=NBewi=hrE(1H6^D<^ARB96!qAIGFTv&>uVhwgO)Gi66Q+ zPr=T=<$l7+wR*J!=Nw3UZF?8~(fIMq_-@zVEb$%3pL*|IfA#9mddwqOKY*MD&hPlt zFTLgBpM3wFzs~vz>Q_0(=hatVa_j8M;%`fRq+90q)*3H;X;(1v6FnB-vq5>|M_-cr z`zJo+O;Rs>*zQ^KJl^Ju?|SK7x8L;w!SN^jivQjDr;4(1#pNHm>+09-_ZJI4<{?YI z4{cmUE>5pD==&(2_r8liaM{V5|5{MO=YD{*Wc;7^!k4`C$ia(anumR;Eo`KIhwF^T2Y=y>Z~UHze&hGDzVwsMt}Wv6i@l3}_+vN!{8veR zq))1U)c1;!EkY3yeYMzf``mLfDy&7gdI7=_yPqX6P z_~`@w!g+mWe`mZdYoO@Gk9<$3&)*B#%X1dZIeM|ZYsEK2&;3(bc~JhD#I9&ul)FY8 zgkOkX8~Cie=qi5Ve|!FmuogMjQb<&Wp!si#;y;9eOAJ=IM+YrCf&pJD^@}`1% zp%=a9=G>YrzMRj=%A3C88`6vW*DX51%O{je*136f8fiB<2UlJ=j#DEA->$lm$lz+tN4cKyFI5@)_%I`&n12l zJD*A;qcZyYqOPi!_vozW{VL{7S%;em=2V<~5#V_|;Kw`4Pu)+Y0{gc>K=B`!i|B9Jrx}JIO!6$em@# zC602t;J5bposIXe64wH*@C(}BvvEFCzdCSLg_C&SWc165cT3Spyh%s?Iq>fr+>Ita z8?^tKhdaqX#^|v|y^YTez|sB*_!a(#Z$J4F*8#3-aMv6Cn!vRTj{R|LFK~SicarCQ zfO$JXy|sfl>NiFIzx4Q>jrW67?g+S@!SOyvTm!iB|MdNGwXwGVTtnd`FRn82$jXbZ zqLaKJ9rak?em*j|D~%pg;FcclB!9WlV~2X{&ntkVKfB;p{$IZR|H~SNz|;y%&t!K5#XIyBIjmYj9m| z+u$B*_|?I0;Ned44+f5YnWEnMg*e*5_qr>OU;6x=9OUL^+TQefqzdY_+gQFd>7B2v^%(WkWC-viffcCJo?@dU@{274nSn-!UBww3{D}$pP zmYko>{j#%L^cDYX%)Be*SAe7b#CQJHonuA5EQw<&c=1yoe6r?gDQ^m#Ugse8l7DP3 z-d`__9Xa#7#yD>ScF6Ni*?gx^^wsjHSL0pIUv}OzXXq)f4ZQY)__==%)|o}~S@HWv z+AsR?C-rQf>_=E9rPSMgL+ca$JGE}0@kD1Qzc;jj9ffzh>lKv3U)nwSQ$Mbk&~n7? z(No;~W&`x}(*S>KeDv?k?|a|y;uqg`w+N4ZGT%qKHTc~6rSCcOrI$Z{4-r0`=VZzD zb?5VMy0iOI$4U4Ueg*cS{N$g$;`NhPyzL^96Y)v)2ej9`cZv4PIzC;LLa*B^^J#?o zgL(c4$8W0mi9hXkOv!fz9Q`8lCC}-9f89X(J%4rXkN5Se2?qUy5HJ+oc_nYcW44nKa4ZZ&65)$OPA zUPu42<$FK!AN9AtSg;{^Y(M6HnjeCGic;vs50uY*SfO6uKjl8d_oiD#Fa03>L3-iK zpVad@^*;9|Kt6ef3uXzpuESrb=UUX z$tmQoGxXs7@(^FXClH+Yk$h{vn&gA{>4E^FAN}e6a{m{-X$Q-mq7T`{?{)EgfN&D| ze1APt^pa@Wa-}#ovQt|G@ParA1=5jw8A7rr>J%D{CDj`FBKpGSrU z$9VwCEr8$5!=;~N*QjSciCSU@=L_h+5&Fx*Z}|4I-==-ydnel`?SbN2y0WfD?PTU%G>O@q5UgIrJSW zoX&5~M^fIz$HnL2vYzMqEPdP=`n`)dw;*@t<5JH@+>c!TEk7^#oW=a%JVQg_bpO#+ z*F%0NL9da*i664|yG<2N#uM!C>lo)yuN81Q-jQA>{F~zriH}^TAMJJi%~J4kzbn;n zjyl#){Ki$cJnHG6{P({CzjM9cc7EeHlyt?9xbX|`lfU}dFWcSxb&r3!)JM9d_F;3q z1mDMV9R%d$r;xKmDc9wGr^iRq9vC;;S^Aw|dq}N|u4LfYACX@(1IKs}*UP}!{$>oE z*u$UX74K^cReze__&%EZj)hmmC-z(6ca!`Uzi}KUIPsfp_f6m*3NbY&e}Op z^2t!!IaT$i*~#&ceecfv*eX79AF%hI^6xo6=>5&22m7-c>P1JAgiBm6k~!XuWyAq+V4Y7vE1=p98;^ zhfC|-SM}6e;zIk_zD8)*6NQ(2V}C@sOI4rnOMjnW2b`b3$$UQZxDC1G-`9Rgzei}G z-twdV20!-0F~94b+=1c8=Y0BQn!%4a^5gw@rTEExa(FK{@5uc?<rwC$$=wG>~ukLZ3_{KxpvzCQ3HMW_4QiMk%LvyS?u!s&jC zey6;RkBgsESzkeY@&6?L5xuk8UCrRwPRMVKc()DC=0EdwU~tT9@|%O-RN*AA2aj=i zZNGQ80*-klaTR>^sSbb4cP0ftf8z0Y$+NBb{*%ZJwV&Z1J3rg^DE50+%$o`D+8&Wt z`EIA5-X|E!7e1FUk3}y{U;2}9-06Sr1GW1wIUZ{ndYgaT$Ew?z&i9d`59!}W{aoR6 zzT5m;`MCJ`Cboz5E8lMBC&x$ByP|NSH|=h!>mj}AcikUozYi6?enh=FkJD1P{r&eDuAOrKFa6O6F0vv1 z$^EzecggpWL?7bWu2!J4_uu;3U$;v9CLl+~E#%9R`ny2Gtxygt=eF_BIr~ zY$EP;_{jWs)72gm&-(#5XcO~&x^x{YEtI*%m3i0K86!U$j*xuS-p6)O1 zgUH&K(K|rTeHq-B!2IO7ZZkt4*|7hy7G5o6F*E0Mr7<>B}{D`ByTih2W9>4VWK3Bjk4UX%LIX>gMwV%uP>Vi{!%zpjT%ueTnd-ujb%WVygNXYTP!)^Rc3)Nf;O zc3xuue#H;__VT%sa=XCQ435u@#Bp76+u-bTMHBo624~07Rp6!yC*$KW#zRHaQ~nA# z#$TGB9^djh<=A@Wx31rhbH3V*Q_MVCzKrh$=y@=?Pf{Q98~mN~Z`Qom81V}20Fxc3dt<_F_G zQ8z2A7N&Fh3 z=W`6752!Ecrw8cyJY=6MNWVQm&+$Fi!C3j#kDjhSpXajH&vX^Nw1M=Dq%O}47865i~@~gwY#gF^;vp-^-$**Q`w1@mE;MewW z$$S^Yp%khUTH+vqCSzuEQ7(*R!P%XIq_e=!c!yYTnUE_;5_#GHq~c$a|JdddAS zK3C~czMp6h>ARpWUFYNIPwL0>zy`q6{xQzW8bc2GP6K-F=gIQUU(`3N6#g>r$9Pc> zuD>Up;P&^8PdNQ+DCN4yYnty8lg^fckFI_Cto$STv83GFp7R`65&d7*)s$a>`x@l^ z!MmPz_iH})lOGe1_K^MdWPuub@h-96A()%D1Z)Oe%~Tub4i z{ENpUw3B65;lz)#FLCzTbGk;r(Vt?!;JHtL^T^DL&^gtSKjV39woBo|pV-4ZV9E9G zJlC=O|D0b!=Q@Vy`M!hqMb3BeKFfJT(Lv%l#{0ECBK*nVLQy!b`*TH|~z+b=8v zc8FfXTb*8q&Mz$ggY$#lMzU)6x8UTySO_WZ&&aN56-Ug!FM>A$BCKDys# zzRo~z-*dDLJ@L!1ynOZX&JTM0tLNMC`N_q{$s1+J zE56tH$I6>#$g2X+br)IwEc}zR%bo{0#q%5K>CZCo*1mPdd5+8z()U1b-*e9mJ^eq- zkk<~JD;MdMxi9A_FMaXzUie(`g1fK8`hUvVpMOoQa9QW|mrK3y;r)Xp_sKo(g)hD1 z#V@=qbuL&1d>Savz54M_|JZxq@oSXV!}ZbiZXM0C;i3PyqBP#cfiGdiSVLV`EQPEm(70;=h61TF7Is~b%3|>_})XW zUl98^PNKeZ&}a2eyq|M?x&oelDB!yo_PplY&e>u0YMXQJg-^)uEzsNit{ZyV(GAFx z@oVR!r@!xAP|gibU)nX#=m%E;ITBynZ)Vw5{d73KIlQN|@ofOF{TTf_wVv6IFB)H$ z*c0g&?_1OR8>8#-x^3o#=q=aT-{|Wy?y=90g6B{4qMj^E|B~n-?}^wC2#w&m&XpzS zE6lt{p84ES{6h4cH?i{;d_Orc^t6*D$61`Wu;Z%vpSgCtQGCQM`<%pi2Ign!U!5PS zD8+usdppmt1mC*Bah`$vhQM_^TzWnF5cP})<+5GJc7xx{Y|MGvF?g#3X#kZ;G<++7=lCFn( zZI3*EvwtCOn1N&d5H}0pbX?a;pOBwws4x6yVz-X#1#x)vqr9?@i}$^KME@ebBWCUG0H^I0`S$sm_pM{k z4WAqN_PY?w%S}MO_^ZD1%lj_lKwhlpxR`#>^^tE=^Q${WFMhgM6pVfxFS)9)oAtWMs6F3{ z{wE#B=RKc39{&x^b)FAZzANefL;Be92=&=0e$u~OfE~1RiTc7h&z^W(SXS3XF2{o` zXP|E=TqGwR7ux)4`?xdIvjskU?>X>rC+GMa!91O!o_-ax#6CWkFyG7IyE6QE-yy$T z!P)QgJ2^)`5myP~lJf*9ca8jN0`K%o?;q_2`JJ5OeVlT~L0qz4h;qk}yYS>D&qL(L z`^r|~WL&NLk5IfhZ_o9xVwdDU8mkBj>&;&-?& zEIeHL{<2l|PUHRkF7^H0()m!kNXD6z%kg&|c;Okk|8-QomTSjn!wk8^Q7-p=&J8vZJLMiO_4C&&HFGs-J_xb!%pq3X4L=r{n}5ooAVdN&+_|$KH_Sh=WD>}xQbubz#sE` zD}L4cWkfIP!}dRi9J_9*_*?#Sdz=>;dUdh?@R;=sV#g5cCE8!%@{9b(_*>f@{X4ae z#GaqZbtHv%JAV56pc3~j4-6O1F1v1{^ni3fAbJgvM~ChMUC`Tpa*q9}wx1ki$Xmc~eBUT~>vqEaWDR;d zKQ%G*%!^$>p5!r~b6N6zCC>pC`QnEOzI$l>VB^#KT<1p}AIS&iQxo;nYly#fJ_w%Q zi904=L-DWQ;quPjC+A<`@{Iiz^QH8_aQrzxd+6NQF6fUvH+BHL_*d*L<2$+bdv((c zz4~T7iSP;KNulKIvg==J*E&Bi&zM(b;B`DCPuRX#a{i0Y%X}Zj_lSI7D|$)(bicsK z>w!P@Wq(KcGt}$;E_%*Ny+2x#k5W|Z=kpW!t*>!;up=IR;`oBN{#zZc{CUn_)Q|bi zJgGjy;Ti@B-kq>d?H&Qss2m76R>Ny8anZ5UK8S7pSwa?P$hudf2CKsQ{ zlbn5QpH<+kyw;@-f9PE40qBoCS9%P*_+R|c#yQXS`_YSlUNXKI-*x)BlJbL`{dU}D z&x5DGtH5jfMUI}w(d~|L9e~b`WBR`l9>uK(Ahkk&i(u#eio1u$@~=8m$T$Jl;?R5p6J>$ z*E5SgLdW|(OZMCB&jlxb<2beP5a$=UuKQW~p^JKc2S9Mre(TS1{X`M<#1HVd_M716 zfA8$){W-=z&e@T|-|qMyGfs%?IoC1cBih5fqrdA94fhjkb3O<0E#S3&;=i0ZpCn7( zl=7~1cG7=qv)+yVSY*hnf2Q+C*0`N^mdnmQ+kVTSx96tSfY7{#ZXufTtg-zv}u0 zJ3d}!=ruRrXCa^NMJ{f%BdZjAWM8g+!TE{fWb$cXy*ueSj^*Dh1t0zUQ~Z7cOTIV0 zhvVqn0Q$^O3V-R3*$=VIeIeqD@v6h6$I&I=L`nW+yluz5^$Z;Q6P6v|?0$CohvOrT zkB8(N3D@@(;<~ig;MiZ#-tLoKzqvLz+Cf|e{0f&i|A@^Zm*W7+<+!|RaI};C)NbtL zwiHhK#j(jh%I^cG+`YfgF0fu(=b6NT@>p^lWc|x}>a~KLt2(=mAK&lO-$URhicWC!GxMc^`k9AIzaL(s z-o}snmMOOiT%nTa8`%-B6V~f6L?5myIZ$R-2Fc@gp}esS6#(k{4Ox`ukOGi1*Ya@q=~rb#l z4ZP?tc{9bli5<5OfYbgJKa3u5-1F-i^g91VUK#geo2R=Bd3KzZ<@e^5&JT7TeSq_o zIc{TKbb#0PNj%yAFpoISoT+v!{V>;+&B2Fy*?yekXg%*D^z6rT)ui1=x}@&M8}P3v zob+E6jF;GdQQx|ci{HPqp6AAP437N~+avWJDxAcxi}mfC{~_NQaN3{J?w2nRX}&$tC&H%YAt%s#i?Rl~K1$)I^NjvrIZ`fCZ;4Ytv4c4JsRg;EMI^j<` z#y^Mpp}|=`%%_FH+4E{Q@Y~kIrO(|h)tn!wx2P@obdAx!PMiXY9mLU36UglVFKi^A zZU8^x6q{f^%@n=llRaNR*hM^2{nG$>v3YrtA3C3k*Cufndg{Tlr}9eZc&>8O(6K*c z+3h)bS@||l^pbDwyA%Dyk54fEnF7C1bdqn61J35#&F1<_(FuRjG2gnZe^lZR!C5}c zx0=D-1bO6F1HZP1JIUW*^ctX^{+4RVw;K&^N}K|Ue#9}4cF2>Jk{gkv@}dNPr{c46 z_m|3bi64ZXVp%R#yrR4~e-8R~6rJdIE3Q+&=`&rN2MQ;7#qs^vzaI0gzQWIsrx?CX z+)vj&eLU{psp}zsEKpy5bYgd;e?0Dgl8Hyn$K`B&6a3l+cMJG%9Mhyf6i)mx#W;DY zu7~vQ{#-^oLman;p7CQjQ+|~=a{pHKde0BJXBdAoj!lKraqRflW4^Oj`Eh)v;mbHq zeEK+!b9FuBk0I(e3a8`vbQ8zim-%+u`V#n54DP8JacnA__@n&&&fcDX{rm;cFTdIM z$8E+R^z+Q8kK4=AzaH~#^?km#8@}{&@iB@0qA#D5E9!d4&pXI%DxCK7vmx&UWyiZ$9ZSM=Zh$Flf_gnwjDEO(~pq(6PWk;^!)6i&x+tFDLqF-CpqhQw|i$LB&G<5=}^ zIa}WVzm~z>0X{a4eT5Ufi+GNnsO!=AAa^I|r3l%v0X{3PJH=1v>35cW6<_iHV<4~g z<(^-1FT!;j_m;wm9lW1))%B3vVuswQqLaA4#K>jbmkOujzERgjF2`joN2o8}=-C(F z@9u&;#=YX>a<;whW)_+yx-0-|FOk<#>n6}zREq# z^%GOz<_ahCLh(72Pjxuv=>|CFyQn95MSn0pTwh@42bWKC^L?DpA-;Z-^N;2m#WTM) z^NEzlI8v_>=qK+;`ai7~aXe3d3cTw zd#wGr-wV%=)`8dd@8{<*&(C>V>J>VtRs2^b-HBv99)*{Y>Ito`ZU59ayE| z{9yM_Z%c2Nym280N=LaFVDI66+zK2 z=7W0LDRqJ)AL8bUk6`2{a*1Qf{nQ(U7aZkMPwoRQK0dKu;=p|xBlw4WYrtteCC|3+ z_xlOzMZHNs1igK4xis|DZxWCf$^JC&=PaoY$IT)?>i5p%o{-oj{a{7?E&j0j)lhHy z!HrojMSB{+Q@+R*e{9~F_D6I*KF^ABfzM6f=h{Wq`QDVbggpJ8Q1Zm~gB#kZ6cc-y zzx3}6xZ+nPei9t{QSKPHn!(WymVA%dRyfJ0h4BaZ4uDf??(c7{mGhrn4-qAz7xp5Rv({C<)8 zuw=ZLPh0TexJ9l@zsC5Jj&g0O^$pRHo^nZFd!nC5l*f3NQQtK<%ZK0HofsVDu;jet zQsKm3v-t)Nk4Gh zvjSf15XWu`5(Q)IxIp~kJ zA9&h7{WYgo%Klr!_D}!e^!++5&{_NKd*;~wfE=;EjdRBjjW6e*KX!b%0-pBQu#Vr3 zFLO^$+b??Aep>iM*W-0?eVnf<*Y*8`_IAP7k5~HsGypCh*nuDW0rG1BHzgi8<~^Us z_#K{=!b$#5%zcOVf!tHV_H%#yp}4d_e{5X3z>D8RuQJX9v~d|_=ruC!OZbTY=?D62 z3wk@g>KS_aq3~5E^yjE`#kwOf80QMw3qY?(A$1ybG?(t zxD&q)$kTSvk31(x+bwnsvHsA`d(@uc?A3M%K6elHt4cd8TsXZQ&LPK+Gq%6t`-}E2 z1A2*n3;51bRy(AhD_`yGvgejm&3#yy1zY{&#=5{|kTmg=JsS zhvd_5W?x9WKWVP$MXz|@66V=Ove=t5=T6~zj9>pnGT$81BVK=}_6urxjju`kDA(Iq zFS*9L7m*j@%k!SH)_08+-w-|5`7M4X(O>JeK0wd!pL0E!^-K9#zFqXMUMD2-xW2J8 zP4p0bqyP3lmIGBUbX-3)RC1#BauL@H3Gr#`dbn?l?RBB}NWW&+^-NK}GPs+ansMIt zP+$Do#D2LiaNQf_)lhHu8{TC2wZX4#_}vH``3*Ao5y$q=@3K!lerMx#WNd#8+Uwy? z@_fHVxw&UMJFOkWQ7*sBUIAXz7eCW4#PPfAO@p)R`U=pmr*IPQYmHx+KQ`WDMJIZY zj`nli;KJbSdcXzSN!yS2RYs2r>aCx+&W~~j;Mer{CEu?nuJJyTsao{(bG?PVyIw9fhw8w*%s62fyE51zy-l{#|V3Zg78UdAO52`LO-< z19GJu@P0~MRy&v|{!zbr{=v{=c74(xNBZ5%zPI7N-NNlje9O`IYKY@|k+Q0new*tV z8tQtaTdKb&e^E#G_x%HOdi|$okD?QQKf(BWjQW+riCnH@+N$fKFW-}}?4Z8%oWviI zoOm4s{lR!tecT!PeT=v-5to*ai}yQ|59e$92FE;SyXb)L#KWEBdColfEm3dV;{)L@ z=3fQ;b{@avd&`th{mOTEeo1{_VDRTI-x>x-c`UoYbq$Vo636%aBZUjajr-8KjurWK z{ywmGqv&=17Qa5RC&ZWj%;H;D^wIbrwg0q(`iOV@lW_#+|H;1}!0Ei5C^;cLE2v*8 zoX*=@Af56yJ}zhLw=Z>ZEIv2!PsHyG{n@+I)z9JAnvYApPviU4w!v{8f_lyW(D5B8 zoIFRC@%(PjU!DTz`!{)?8}r3_Kz(kW&Vxe7vojtClAiDH7H0gIL zKJ0HPZ{XwNeNwEi|B3U{)ZiE℘4GQaEjQ?s>l5Y%6Qh`jFif)OQq4 z+ns6$J}%B9>cjn$6N6(O(QfuvONEm>s$yLY=bgxR2b|6$!EbTC5b^X+*18?LFHV|W zWN$nlP5S;fIKP*1{-WUa^CcPk>PEn8{h~PJ+n8U;n#Z8LE$HohVjuK&KC$q8r=O8` zu4vBZv-Yw7Zi7BGPqPTm)AYjf@~zJ~{e2kaEkW=qHv1qcrHJ{r zsb{Q%YXGnFXWx(Wyvi?k{TK5yt3B~t@`LApL*CKne-j@ifV5BB4>3=QFLZV@Ppaq- zQs;jIr|p&Y$?p~E^%oK5(>#xmCG+#nmnEMTj^@+OlwaZUe**rm{P4rx@!XFO-Y@z@ zd{X0AuIJ)-NN{^SK)+S?$o1K4f6?XfAGvr4UdA!jAG~jB`vhn2TaCNY?M3{X8aD&i zMd{=w=hHGTN~j+hoW0NS+@-m}(GKz(!v2lH+4~3Yo5ijle}312_XEbQ2AuYf__vAk zlx_b^{i)Zu?fie}{Qe>2OpIPUC*Pjmzs%5!_cf~*{Xo4cFLL(V`$jQiT}K^w>xXq< zzpK74vL76Q-oBT#`>(0rG(+ChoQKc+V!SA?@M345mDe`(lvf7c*mtgP-kWC0>rtM0 zkJvW!)Nhy}uWQ~rX35)R$ZHyU%FDeZ-F_vH>v&&xC|_EjxB1cry&Y$C!}1Eu!v*dW zw9mGi1?bJXztnTs8aUy@U+6ik@Y1yX`u@N?;PXrsc;OlODObRAQOmy`+oQjGCw%F5 z@*ROrKW9ik%e-YdRs6L*wx3-Ar}I_!$CS(O_2gdW>=&NmAKSlIP;dDWM}G8AQ}Gl3 ztiRFqb3Olhy#AB>A4Gm6BlW#-z7NWHFBSWFsrZY%94}G7+&4NqYu}~sd&zgwh?{{= z33&J=6_2{A7mWNwF70953a@qYItnj-w(~bb)LTCjNBtPLnc>HJ%3WvhBaS8GR(N@m z2NJi{w>Z74>Uta{}$# zf&SR%gkmr8gXq=8^NU?KR|8J#CGqF@gZ6UWt38*gj{cwPUYW1M0AJCgf%A2bS$8A& z#bcd+j>V6$&V=I}`Y&sozQy-b4vo`$cf+4&62FR{*ss%1{O<0Mc(f<$Pma@P3McmN zu&&FF)7QZ1I7$BGZgKuObY6e$6;AJC&+BgjFa3e&HRgJVA9U@2e(eFL^@{$Txt^c< zq=j$vJbGrS(ZrC-_J3g6`Hu+MXqKMy~jmw?y$iJbXur?1!OX2{uQj6eDT zITD}pZ~A(P-66YHl!y24f)l?l&AbKuzRi#~HqW(I9_bsebbhq+IDJD;d>eS}N3oCX z?a=sY26{WbnrEyFTL$DwUNIk7^8Lp%pCy*MpX62LRY^OQcsJGGA^*2gZ}X~?kyl;d ztv}{R#(P0|Cf;2`Pyeqop$#zt0wT)zBSe#ABy*c^33<6 za?sa~r{`Jn0_$Hw@hg2Z`UT_9xuK^&tH5jfqJO9MpYgj%6?{LwfwF^A?{^E)b3TLn z*mw>t=R2DIynMcgb@U79CmAjFvj3z0g+Ah`=mlrT(Yzm(ffs(#uT(K_IDj1TZ2+hJ zBKX8Sw-Bt?|;{+Mj=V|GI=6+un*8KiPa-2lSHuhu_6M^xc8ltDV1&{q8^$ zc={{%H?E!8?+)~U)AsNC#Sc6Dp?0zaeX3ssy=^C(40%he>pLW`{u<JQcmQ~bG6)wvAcwGkNuv{pdw6iAq=^^|;{kOmwz4C3d zPtMtu9!ED`k36}>`B88pZ+hO(OXhJKcq`BD$8qw~=d`n*x9d7+H|?51&Jrc{YCpu+ zi}+nYFR^2Q_I1qniKM@tUg7v3YG3^~gxlBVmt6m0+t&zq>$eK_)9Cjr(jPMaXx|p} zMblsNdq;MEYhmE@v-0@Lm#3pQx;V&n z$v57QX!i>B=6)2i{=1IO<1S6S%d((I3Qd|5D*Qd_ObJ^fSLFR8=_Xuc~OL_PL`4ob5mAyVJiTJ_Q}` zd*TO?voYuSQ?GeIj`Sa^hr9mc(DO~{zd5^)eZHvzPrWLbceKwpE#S2MqSxH)OJkg^ zzo($L?YVB~8OKFHp7^bg?+qS%Kbd2`@=*WQe3SE=?cdg*=lzcQb%59Y*z1RLrH+}W zmitfVi%;K|zl9u|KX%_R^CvexVMvtslA>^7ws^tZ@zVV*z^m zJ(51wk=geN>kN6NYmU3W*1psE=h*ve6L_|dG5lcfuRY*&K1BacJqPgIB>VmCG2Wlp z_}G4M7tmkwu6!BnM?Lej_+9CI5Pb8VJs0O^=oi>8vYp%Kxe?^q^Y86Gb<%U3MSWMG z*XQ4hz60#jrhl_a;Tz?9uJmSScjsCD_^|ar=O^ahAwF&J89qDV6N+ntIFzt2^Z9P# zW!*uh83g+I^qguUA)e!jJm`*VxZQJs0La zO*wq7XW980mmfTz4D>PIi7zid3GfwvO|TDrq1KIr{KEa5+&@Wq^h@b`62FLjw0r!u zr{{6uKiznS=k}8?{nJ%^Lwa!^Xx4t$=>huDE1iCAoFi@JZxy}x%YGM0@FBgpzcg!~ zXydJkze4o&I^lYee zwzZud#WzGBpF^$QLuvYnqK~e}aa}zv@oR`L`~RhXu5cXJ-1mj!s?V7Y@$F+B6VF+O zzv8&I6yFd%&pBScA<z<7&l&2iKc5a9{aK{_9>23W@*{4CaYf;W68puDrx^X#z*PQB4-UHL~6 z`^65P4?;Vp;MXv?>x~^<;JO~}B!8Xp=Lq%I4&q|{z;EvHOP>c)0&Zh)k2LzN@SIfq zQQzKc3~mHmP2nUjt~PdLaBj48Gbw;WNP?bYV2KQ@FR|P3^~8> z;8m`W8L7$hvgFdItE975XW;bh8`}x z4``<9q0)Xleqa1S|E+;zoTOUpC603WKC$o<+TQd&pepJuKRchz_l_;Yk9ke~`WgI) zqkeopIWhds8GDx*{D_PB;e4E(;m16oe&zp;b^tl_A93Wz{WA^V1-GAn$2@{PzoHx9 zE6?}ad3YV2mA3$W3HxfO7xiX4Vt=$YdM%9{+EMt)w7v4atF?anrrW*5H)q!6ie7TPoN>J#xGr+%=iK`* z<`4U0{>@VOiyvtRORf*%dLix$fIhh~^k1Ts>vEsteT4CjJ}k07_rUBMPOa-H0q2hs z((8ok893_AvJ=Fm*DDU7{}6cEVf+6sa5ICWJjS&J+*;uz9_!!n?=$pI;pftMAo$j$ zE`G;+XGz*=`BkUiFNTm~`&GN&i+YU%dPyE`YECcv{@?m*2YP$1G53$!_p-&GPy1mn z@AsYGveswN?;X(Fb*BZ42bzy|<3{590eRxb?Z2FUe_Dag`f-qPf7%4(h+T~bIX`CE z#k{Kjg7b@AcT&Z^6T9xD1-x$Gk-T%`5Bd4WJf|GSeF}POU*FIZzX;3AZGOc0dyVhu zio8gVT=hrY^(M{R&R~DKr&M+Rvu!{A=^92b}RwzQFgO z4W}RErPenuL4WMJoQ=_|0y%bFPVs-H^Iz;(aUJ=Q`rNdb{raVmQzG8ST0cy!J!%@6`J7-6LIpSi<)c8`w`D z+D|I|0>9hm@9$5~r|5H6Bxdpxf3qF1Ed7$RtBR61j?)>R3G`|yocMW(b0k){JHT)+-d-tb{!w{VWRkoUeSO1A4{&|ga708X&XbwaXiZ&*Gt}=*sc9h zo+tK%{K0dfv*Oo2K;MPjtoV%;y~NL+ODFb*^y2zKuD_#S80Veh8=~iWz^pje-jn!6 z^eUS3^0M^eJeXM@o9}<6>pzEzZ%D6M#(F~L$AN$n|{m3-hG>zQo=TJ=Yax zA7ApGyVtYxy~^&{)%4wY|lH&ia*ys+VzZa{D19qySTnFGyaNR^y-^)nBd1aFA9%I z`eBJL^MPg8tQTcoER~#4Ud*u$vux;@7lrrxc2XY8zM*5k(J*wpudwVw?%L4Pzx@OB zy@B&b6{XF)`2qR`=t|$7_*L?r@^inQ*d0A*eZbk+Pvlntzoy~$W}|;EgCB7m*YkT%V~^k2+;{t<2)gb>tyQ&_eP`N1p0LpPU8KoM!&3h4;7unn{@Ph2mEIS_XeX!6}YX3 zJITM==u!GjXSa>_>kPjw`ky-RQZ4#@i^0u+>lhs6(w}4Ch6eY|hTj0VnZeoh;tk-| z9_}RnP2k7;F8o&5UgD@<0sN}K3mdWbZlm88_obG>z1-lY!1WF8Wd_#;ZlZ9KKQ94} zc4XzxQqhUNq+|Y6!GC9PFEV*&O*1*8^^3 za8EaWY6CYnxThLi8MuvyJIO!A*irnwa6dpC^;_dPvIe}c5kKE*2=^M)Z2W#!RS{8zufQp_CChQEdW@kfqAEj&gYJ9sGg5tr4UO+5Z*Q{Q3kJi|TzEe*~-Pca`0|3}9=y>5Gs z`Sq%YJIOx)`kq7CLcR4T#;|QukgDsn3LZ;gCB9^$Mx77 zk6(J-UnH5@{`kGu>Ypb55qh>K($_&h zQ1f^)AH?q@b`^b4f7Fi@E|L?kuVVZuZ|dXX_QU!T>Q@HGcENs#dguNuu}}1--4%6R z>}G#MIsE=q>395jHrm}$^dY;Os2?hvwww1S%A5GO%3nM|dhy$XO#7_jyo1T5i5x9|tmyaig#X~LgUq^rtreZ{V;r{XddQvy z>Pvr~=%eF6zcCI~9~XaThV=vRYZ=@F;Ro{LeYdZ0TJMRv9@4u3IZK7pdb9tbUK<}5 zuXAEOzq48Vpy!9EhjKsa&G^+6Zoj_cI@jOWbLQH>MK;7g$(L2e`B>D4?S2M&yB@-x zuf=|CnIX@vKN4jmKdrpVUpV`%ytY}tM0s`KwSB^uej|?Okgab@`is5aaE_V1-;4r$ zBfrJxbCSQNp8926c%I##}*q(?RX5ei9IRj4o%b)Zcyl<^l{b_OJcNDm;MtDiPWE{(XrTc+& ze5(KI^4R*x#-{^57H8u#%)nW{&oXe<@9PYl^?Tv3!|}F$uL4J(!(XxATdF?tUDLyiO*m(Ol>hcPJF6KuYiA2M+9;*Av#;t; zvy~?}54=(z_4(slsW!?L5)K$HntOjDHjT;nu^Y{ayOI#Qu=K>#9DacL8!b z3a9n9Z!NHkNL#7l)-PO@Y0`h+(dtsH)%h}d_$`L11|DK z{1dsvar{?++^*s){A|BF%HT&F`E4;ioEv`je!0ouM;!UJf7{(ZiXTbr7X9q_sD^rL zFLC780Kc~3$9npCkim~QmR0bZ`utMg*MgE-3Nd|U;1;VJy= z{kNIHk2vz=!PnZq`W$EXq3?2YUupeg ziJ!!-;^UoN_Pg92;IzM@`@y+-;Q37Y58BIooP*x(_b3~B;#UEA(Kz9J$IPc#In|Fl zd#s#w#(4yF;I&=ihib~T_X$7IpU=(qd!kj~w7sJLn2R6+hwop^tq&1IS@}ssX3{Ao-R1#?$wQ4MAt~t8Dfu zFptLpIg!lN{;!f00lBTlut`ex89&?^BEJKdE_@WrloyZ)>OIi~l&TXE{cF`Tr&HkNgqO!`tyu zP2r@y@cWB9#Ebg3fzy5w{PcdVy&SXeP}lIu?=E>|<2nRC8&~pUyPO2%>O3W`58M)^Yv<|rl{-~082QO~#>y@K zgY%2FSL71M`11bV03Q5O1gPc4jJH|lywpE_{GPicD-eduS(t0mFC!Ah(zxgJhS7@IoiT+wH z`v>Cc892^25Z3|D>SyOUh5?-9Gw1bZN}l8spP$z6)BRK0k8`X8qAgO2f2<#ipLTXz zJ*^*W893{oHgHz1_0J%KpY_i)fYbh2DS6sIEp@*L*_}0SZtbrAOV~fwo>m6V+S3o< zv^^8li~qzPJ|C@q(vNpaPt2>@I9fe({~ET(>RAckw4P1Wi=L6pRKL%8Y|h`)9`+YQ zMIUOnoUgX_SUr~q^xP>qAwBs%bE}?@_j!bVt@dw8zYx;1@_rYWLwfeW$Hyh>A=z)V zfg3Bi;&;w_FVyvrJ!RBy6;AHAl^dO&mr5X_ALSMP-M7#74^`CrdY_!LdDRNy((fZ? zh(}+^)%H!)^^ko%&@UBE+jogGFSc*v<5KSAUcbJRz&;-9ojJD%PIamjjF+Bd-XpqTsB{WwOL3O|mAh^wi33XX7j z+aI-o^Yu&4WoEz4_W}dOSNPd>HO=5h9QpCRz{=y7ypNzAb&jvjc=o2=M^sdOVsG-i z#D0SB51I-ucG&S%Pt|LF#E~E0AB+`V_}Ta_P;dQA9R0%g2V0+C>it3KUWq>v{nF1> zb>OUA%45m*2OY&%?4X^D$1sB*apcGM2Q!afGH*qGT+h4qaOvm#!b!;9J$GZ^RqEOJb(2SUik5Oi2Np~w|*v$e&O@$Qt^}LwEAbdc_YrNlJ73S zH|o#w^^d#fC%c}P{Q%`P&pN-^^Ud0zx96L6fY)}2ydmBf9C|LCgZ|j(!WHlm1M$Na z->JFH%7d}rN1KPx?t)dGEOtjDG4eB`-UUErzLkl)qBxmon@C_}Hpy)h4% zaXupRYYX~g{Z+^(?LhpsH0QRFZxuN0FTsy7PtNs^v}5qN^te#sUVEp@GoEuO{*e2w z&9fQgwT6j*Mc(uZ=Laiq8PHGUZE)VBmB;o#`zq(0AMEOW(%C|ZFcPdWApxwdBFJ)($7I}zZ2Wepr@Xs&)vt_rN0v!$&cSp=$5x*+ z7tyAkZ|fI1zqU{wv|r&w-|{p4cEWg#fYbVh`Ul?kYM=1)u!{SNJ)dqH;467J&&VUj zjqRgxKHNXpJfRjnN!ty%6Yk8r5h5Iw?x`uMbx`ugxuh>yH>($w>SU;EU8;)n$&@-M@;I$nh zZ~fKI?nCeI2cSRp{r#Bu$N=#d`vKa)dGLk8N!-WK-@d=!X6V1f`hykD`=`G+zNP(* z`#FD=u1nh6X?nGR7k;8w^S$oAKZYFg9RR2OD($5E!PDEx8g%x3`Vw+@e`NdJ2ITD9 ze_*|`&QH=e?jO#Vv7x73ZQ!+CB5!E)qrVwf%9~}#>l%8>TV}}X;5*Uuhm}YAO3~R@ zz9xyU#I0fIiLV2%?Gt<(=N#MdS=M-PaOC=t1?1WFBV2FJ=N#Vu*8%;+|Ff@i?e)<6 z^x9{_A4jeqX#&rD@8fyMzEAG~r~S6iL!4inwT^~sWKik=n((Ct*dw%JGe)5i_J?Vah{^EY?A@J0zZR8L?%h0R)3>VKs&#lGJadsX1 z+*$#idKGb=bH_ZlHi6Ur+V=-vd(ZN0@z~?q=L+(UUGK6rcJ%+&#nHCU(gV_Q7dt9f z-7`C?@RMyX_BnS9d3HXf33@x9G7IP@{YUvSr=Q<{q~~!fXWe|aj+4HRGtY{j>-^gM)N|(qbSs66^o`fka2!RuHwq{1c!KeaZCAz5 zOSk)wAKE|c>_4q%D@sp>IgEyeFF*Bk+7A-f`MXd5&cPgX*57?IUqLy`fSi5*YraDQny zJtA4h5XCBW-`wJRrd%g1JVejJ%H3beWoL(67kb8<+Qh<@bT{2Hgv%BPRl32oK&kU!?AFI}A29m$E? z;nhxD+Hp8{h@H;5B6&lbv>l_0&&QS<3`a(e9v=z!R{}U z_=!KShhFq2<5c-Ci9d9l>gu}a#k^qI?>x-x_Ur78QdS9Cn$A-d*-n_4L)%B3x1LSvB9H)w2{CNTLo7X1o zT=cprBaU02K5lP?FHG#xe235S`QB{!GENPjK8{mcT@Tq?Mg2hGbewL4JhrE?kIUKm z73^CW+zsGk+uK&*Bu>0CA$n6j%O%>=2=eL*uk|OMWy{B%xd6Rt4|jgvq2C@D z9NX(0_mdfLQ-fpw%lCpk;8qGJ_sMvE-@F&heUY;}vN`@me#uYp-P5dj3yvdNpttiD zWqdD?&sW5EGvwL*Z=#IkHT_8X1?cU##eV09{mMEZPy8{)ybs3##AnS<^Zopx=atT- z&Y#CVuk?WzdquBx#(u*Ia5_%nANzbhf0E0qL(iqF`=gy#lDyx`$9pV0o~i(+<;(L+ z{avR&zw|+8pI_|zR>pT2kRy7vpXkPI$Ier4F>l7_u&jJ4UFPh!&vCWuojlT0zbf$B z4-yAHCoqpX-{9_p_Wfw-n((-NkinPjo9$roB`$9E{l^&Zg;Vc8GWc@*8uNv|J*G;x`c?evd9K$Vsr?6n=lE6clMCs^_4VABC;pXwHs-73i9dMX zqCe)SuYH#{zKZX=D@7lY-)H@oB=(A5xE|i_Un%*xcz+=E>40C|;CSC+9&jCN$KbNo zrw$E{d{}bd+sxn?PvV$=YlV||@%xE|D?C5M=cLd+=AS;NQSz^$=t6$3qQ0wer{!N? z;k14ebzSzUF>fQ8`yc<7KSFwNABXw=Qk-vvFHP*%dCYwrS$z5ZL4B^2&f~V?8~N*^ z!ha_7mRinO;X?ZJTrhpElgKIHd(sO&lU2I=*M_&fiGO?+s)^TlDZz! zXA1hd!s+&Nxf2)5Yx%gGtsj72U*W_*)MuiuhxBQHeyMO;pUaFs8y}am^;PgIRulh- zA1}3hke4-sy97A4Keqd}!Cf#o-cJSwcd?OMc&+RArUu7-6O_yTVP$aKpFkY@hul?( zz2bj>xcT)&R^CKWz6qb zKTMwG{CLO@Bk-M~6hEHkhlRq4A2zkHAGTqA^PNBU=Y1hB?$4MXjfXpX?ekZ|(6gPj zfj9oi+w){8kKb2{o3_;r02Ma^gGbodDXR9uSI(HcciafkBhJ5xkIUKmHSAj&9OoIC7o2z9Dcrt)y2{0; z{K&)~A-(y%-mEya6}|YA?USaT@#dahzuU^_Xu3-_sR#!uJ-#mvP$p z^l_YuwbSiggRZ7 z`o6+x|33rr=--i#i@%e``X%g}8{E^u$NGPxaN_?a{9k-@;t$dLEa+J_&|bG_Z!^fP zDLQQj^<&xeac3CE0p3#%(Qgk7?gI4SJb4qisll;-l6EB z+*Gc+ag*IYQvr_cSk#j|p`9$bFUrn$b};Y9`9$LT0luO~4(sd2pLY4q{%3NzYd2bt z=(*#3PJNF;>&0bf?#$^}9>ZAG>~c1H9zzKF{Cn{AJhg7VFLqtylE#PyHq?uI;EnVg>8YTPTZ7;81Q+wr_RUmniE`c7IRs{;b<}e;2TybAWP( za)kW?3zRiHKNs(SJd|6M?XP#&cPKm0b$_o=);sR+DazjS+}}ma+Yg@a{vN)-mE$*| z9_u8FZ*hN5P?o;O{oO!0MOl8UyWT`O8M(i6Z*yfA{jv z&QMO@?XKtMt{kB(yvO}LMp=9>a5#Ut@`vv4As8>fOS+ml%0PBAC!%Ma(~ZImjBuPJw#dA zxxYs!bDws9cTx6ouAlt>q`e9JW7GLRp4o_68cT^iMw!?u{Zc|(f+EHidz4lNL#Ad- zIt;N@ijuL$+Mo!E)YjNzPf>zuL#tw`rmCdYpw(FWzt27I_vb$MeC}sH)8GHTUNg_< zSiu47~vuThZW6z&>DVB}4B5rlSV$uWVp;6$1x=*;NhR0!*xC z@ETxvb%PfHdw>nhFFnA>nntb!H~`FHo~r=H*D`WhzyV-xs-X`7>+2XiwXT6xz|b^< zcd&ja;yGd;Ftd^2*8!v7Fn9wnwz0u0fIYk~m&X0r5bMeOCPpr@y@7ea&tAL3e z4ZRIG1kB@ozua`g?*JBdHh5zf1ABm(T@Bs>jO}jl3Sc|~95B8IaKQMU29NJ$U<)v@ zx4~s`X~6LD2Co68PB3^KFnXfF%YZ|`>Pdzk{)vG_z&>F1WJ52M46Ff$e+nEha*DxA zfDORdsfL~bYyl1cbEg@8^mGHufUz@B4zLB7C>weWumhM{VCZ$g)R_iv0LIQTcJH+oc^e$lP9)mXk zV@-qC03-JrJOx-MywA`h_ZwIQtP_90(EEUyuEAS?<-Ztw2$+8re8A@029LaBU9){DHxnfSC^sUi{d=$bSrsO*ZTM3SfMS!CQdY#SC5s90KNX zjz|@-4VVl=A7JDw&<7Y@68ZoKfU%`e4zLfHUE0v2%NW=IjD8h*0EdA2h@n>j!^;}H z1{hh+;3>ccV0w8&?*SH9FnAp>^)-VR0DFMN6%D-)SX#;8(WrsRl?`kH##S+S88Ei0 z!7G46!2D{4UIiTDJ^suZhF$^;t!eNCU>xtaRRP0zPb>-80nFgNswQ9`FpKwt8h~NE zH;k56-`xNV^L`buMjZE>a$hR@Qsqs|x-+ln&aLMs zd@f4J{i$8H+ieFaE0_GPUtuXzzQ3Ev)8AJ9>VylH+iy$Zi=MB@AI?R%gh4~Q&OLJO z-p3VY9tB*0=!@)*d;^|-?E_zb>y4#;3I4;U!wL+~#Om;g)z<^bz}Ex<0|08o69c9ewP@Sa{ir2Uo9-r27IvCF@=m=fNw zDdn7aK3Pisa4teV7oLND%C;;rqOS@4UBGqMSmugr`v)v1eDR}>JhyH#c_qEQlEJej zk1qB(E)a&LfOE}0WcztDj+%L>!OZ_+-zno>*}Y7hH@)=MBadvcvpZZl{K;j|DfieV z)jW#$`db}x!b>>kZ+0Fwevv*r#o!mN()$B-QIE(sAWyj-^c}GK8_V!4ddj=wE!uHp zZ?ArY&VEk2Qby?P=Qh2(wDF5}DbN0I%d`L6^a}caV&K(>*yXrj%XhzF@t$+A7Sq!=F;w$K*MAvXP7Y zZ6|K2hBQA4{vii0Se3e@ek;E)g4ILqL#5My?i%}5JZEyIVvjI6_ z2|bH`YqvL!@48+@K85}M?79z+oNw#WagJd267Rcbp>saadL%!oCyoE4w}3x$|6*m< z6T=Ysm?dA>&*byo_^JB_)mH=UjQVSk|4!kaR8W1TEcp)PxBlpXJ?#3DxC)p*LRo)* z4{xJWch{;1d;(x!hivDQ#uN3BEwtMPnY-RLx(2hyxd}-UQu5IM){+Pr3 zZR_E8ymnk&=xIM}ez$>kIUn10I~d>WxFT35jiTdR9X*c8_)t5}_|LZT#=NGx78Lu^ z{~P<8dPyB`hyLdD-CKzwz(q1j$z* zPy4a&8-L!O{oCn*?GN$;_>qBpVcIck+3ipKXZz;3Rf7C3FHPMuXuOC)Kl@n&^5?&F z-^KQLA^Llm$LW6$@@u_cxu4GxCD(FEe@L%o@)0?}>kpzQd$m8m%=aT-xpMI)cw#+!GYcKY$gCbc8)%f_+(NCCEqW4)0DEC7}PYk*C_4qzWJg!w57m;g)z z<^YR;JrFv$V43v)1b4AK=GS;2|32>J>!t0XB}d86SV#k^t@I5%VxLk`|>wLkLa(Dp`T*` zA;*&K=FXI&?xpqjpr?4xx@-Mo-;dn;DbXL!dE;A9x%NS39)Ewcpa1w(4K~D*A*>AqS-MI&yxvz-0@dx-P z`l*kQdDw35ypaU>;)k9)>vx^^(oV;HM*ZO#!SOS`A?D@%PI!L#ZyfpQ%TmsbALZzG za@Mpb|M`=zj_Az==oPpcroCp(DeN+H&YT%)qe=T;g}x2GyY;d+{`0Z#)BkpW z9Vr)@VA?I~@7TY!Cj9r8>%1rB#1FQALblWI?LBYi%w1;`M2?rM?_iUs7~pTh=}*6P z&L7>4BjIO2Pk(Io*$#YX(7&M{zEX6EJ;q5$yW7r~J>$qjW*zAc7%(XM3eZ;peC1bf z-*V^cYYjz2+C>X=6mh}A^1FLs<~+B9TluA(A@ohUwLJH}WuLg1cH)POZXaTY{h5&M z-1Kkbm9B>z^z3@|YWa7M*>gvcSXe!5yYKgA9y06Dk+v-IqOS}+b--G6|Brur=f?x; zV}1#l=iTPcn=@nftmCyp(bt8ZA>gdyCRac4@Xqdbq4>xCMaX`ZnKyT&jfkH3p(amh zz#DEq?YJHH4u2|sNqrSS7o3;q=lfNJ+^5=h){%$KoR^t5^Uzs`%sAScbEK@B2aL;g z=-uj(2|F$O+$T>8U+ne9u(yl|I2R%3IgbDCJZD6FcA_&)d~05~-!b>z^M8L35wVj7 z9YtIq{&D zp4&OQPiWgZKV9g#|Bm51-(50wt=Jd8Lx+uS*V-@6chB$9fBVYKx4WF>k^$w!FOFw~ zY=6>D7B;RGps(`Iiw8}=;;CQLPA$NW_K)N4GMAn9_=Wo)H;v`GW0Yfk6fvG}ck;XU z&PlEMfRq!xk;6?ssP{Wlx4rf8J0`f}m*gt}zR2^ExH)bTvR<5)J9|F5uda_g^c+~q zT=Dr954*1ui~dT0e(e|A$zhu%zH`Xd7cLMVq+C0oocP6dLCF5Q`#h&xApp_OyoB;5 z{;Bh(r}kau#OWd;{5a^ef53rfOqg-p{%;9i?5DvOoY%tgvh8tRL)CdHLC;eEEWO%4 z^w3R3m*}qt=$CTrKk<9b`g8Sz7F;#+$>vX3t`|_w@$2Kw;Ur-m>!LPb9P5NOV4U+j zU>~rD`67*Rv%>KP{VfmJ0*s+uW&x?E1)SxncZ84fL&#B{a<={P%4N`A8h|Cn1$->M zdE~PV$hc_F_Md)HJ~Yd;ud&Keek^?~M>$i^&VDY|`BCT>`oh}Z!Ok$rX9UuY_M3OT>;6RLn;Pnr2Z?^hYkZd{|j8)=}N$RwQiqO&WQ`G)?qp|1-$ z(nVhT#kg9%cjNaz_33lMcVs`Izl7Z5IH)KR=JLfq+vM@C39Eg!Nv_*0J&e)06t;|adI5q<=DNy`S$&fxW`#( zKNxTEANz0h_6dJEP|C~mIo5;VjxVF~ot$Ih6TbM(-`yGUTk*y3A^eMi&i$>tlGF9T z_1bqonY6*?^FRO6*m2qq^f0cAj=$jUoeq2RcKX5nm=Ql7G|!ENFMc#&uLH<^o52`< za2`LR{KT=(Eph9;wjcC!os<8w>qGm#=#JM;{zB!8O#7qV<-4T%lGeZzx3W4AGvYw zlWn{7>x$p+{*C=h|GEu!C$L=-XMGcA-ib3G#ObHt(%#rE3G;JJ{)&KQz$#!JP|8bt zEUf15|4qer`w{RoVEAbxKU8u~KBvSLF8hGdg7G5-DE5RNf?UR;myzeZMUQ}9vgl>B z!>UE^pxzsbF7@43xQw4ew4Wa6><8i}FX?CHvrW9uU?BSX9fw@J_swy)J~jUj;P>8q z=-R2@+tuB^l>Oi2k4+v**!Lj3|KHc|VA~Y=DC9H0Fm|)RKRfE_FFBS5`Nwf`+lM|b zy#L^N?q`2`o@iQnsY9TSgY9Uu=C|Me#uF!eBz(~`(r)MZ;}JeDC!SH~=yYK>hH@e+ z^G*lfc{2xP$fY4iy2v|!k3Fv(CKBdy;ux7%YtZw>Huqlko4p1%iiE`32A$*L=W8wb z*ctm=dzJ7PYUenSFqgIyKFZ|dmxZq^c>nNg-F+6ZlK`FLUTX8hPTu{$A6G?#+y2l_ zGmztRT9|NwmVUOst*0-&hoj$j`Nn-~ z9Mt2l_{FwJXpc9dSjHEgBTrk2qfNeqFZMXTaeSeFStTdq3+1Go`@91DnvxTG7?@?Ec=Au=*=4p6>0-8`4B?quHUxwdzBn>nUFvCBBP&SE*r2$Ve0 zAHviLULIv#6m9z3R|Nb#Aj^q9X^;KyKIFcKL^|gS;Y+@`ZsYwV<7g_oP9CRFPRdEU z>ym$>=U>pc5b^ORj?5QaU!D8bEq^}$->1(s{y6Jy^w%`X@%~Quyrh0Oj&uFA)QR6& zY5#R{?tZvC?_m93fu6DQ&AKAYL%yN>c5*kWUbvnSpCr#ce0R@0hfebHB6;Teq=R)6 z^BhxhlE1|K2i*E%J?ZsJkRN4rUnPFn?W3&piyxdHxSpaPbtNbDO*x5A>bnj8K*@=} zY+v*@^b;>`@t1ie%%gl%$%$V@^dI`ed?l5f^!uE`#jh0fl@(q5;&{|WJysPz$geo- zUCD`G91rOi`*BCfiC;rM9*UjpITWmn|be>tA8{}$2ijlGGJ z!w;M1x-C3E`CH=VUot+Ye^1GjO#Y&$nt5f(+V|ez9PH$KBI#1b@p)7`tDwByPcxR? z8stQe_|N?n?rRmmZ!5VVdt4XT{jq(YHD3Qzw+nAv$Ra;U#G6!d($2HM^>`rkKKv?K z@^R3s7Ci)dL(!dlhS~~u$4}I24|KK*$rCSWXANtAIC7?$4>=y_a?;L*mOSM|r{tgg zi|wqDGv{HXPx105^{@A{gX*IKd3%4gKh5Z4yQ?X^x}CHAGM=`QbMsDI%@ab;gC056 z=Wi&kaLI2Jaw*Vto|s>UHs*7;*@tX%B)1%#{xWi(R)oISZaXVfIHh%}=yLdzYnGk* z-Lu_$BJig)@t$W3a+_S3dT4?>o4VzlgG@|6B!8u8AMQCJC8f=JsQa{e&d@{o&}kqmSH-SyV_MxO6sXCS}UnXwNhySx5g8Ii9; zK6Qa9SAzVblfSriit}()=Ub1vb~#V08J{^04lI9cIgW!}D^4xvJdYfCJ}_y|RjPDK z#=q>(O#YbfbNAWuYF4t_KQTTt?*+(f{Z5Rd&ROaq4`IkB04u7z^y}OzCU1Gf*+97_ zrr4M9BzC&j{>9$`?SZb#(`Q`|TqkosnKA;M{7g)COnc*gJN?egz29A@bpzs&{ual3OO)?yedQyx zE%~v3mz(W{^G@OnlfMk0l-2VS=L_DaC2&6_a-zQm|5%ReDXu@MzoGO?KIkuD)mmTH zUov?ozpu)>{$U>D`jY;I%U*jBJIpsB=gqohFR`gvC(vF->2b$v$VU)A?G=@rv={Ez zai8j~{=B7sf56`sFkktPOkB(t_gz}h!+iC|(98X#>*p*8KQ!@_9Yl}JcXqz)eHq?g zM;Dm<(ElWG_%|W0@)DH466Edu2s?ijrC0Ko#QnOxFVs|W(w_1K)83gM?we$=k1*1| z&h*za>y5ArdFE$;bB4%Is`BC=_d&Q{(th65Q&!2j^^5(^RYkFLRi>`8(o?Tj{~&+s z`X|5sy{$et@Q}NnG5kpr`5rs{;5tP3;ztekT7ZnVH-;apOF`#4`=4KY@rUh~J3#){ zevrTSQ(OOinJ=EZTlh|%C(w@IjxVG7WBx2JztXI0qqBBSKA z-)o7Z&Nch62@jSYx#4>GTl-D^oy%s9yX2;`-RC*tH`|xU3qE4k!6gokPlR3A@B93i zG^zV1|F}3*e779~Zvrx&*f}~c-oEMD;*fLw_s#=f{lo4LyeWU{c*wtJiCd3ekh$iE z;7{(q?Du2ab=F!#cydX5NxtIe+w1Q<{3!$00o!BvxsFjCTJWv2Z@ur>zuj!?c;hYk zzu9|-2lhPf1$X#$^RDtEIPFULpuA_!HF?Sb8avMOX)Esq#h1KCfF}T%_o|Z9?P!`P zcCO{0e7t<^BkQ~ETj!npovX2{d+Yz^eUTOaIgS#iUBQFmiJfQSNdStR)Q>%0rxf4q z7xWu+#*tH;{tP^`lj8O-HVH+I>c&?UFzBiGy!?@rH@+zQ5#=cBHK2&H3kEg!zi@ zFQezzqT-9+ao}k{=BujYbiOu%y;Gk5PI<=nui9Tw?Kk<;7fVjRVui1{k8Q;79_z)C z7o2vbyu`urgD`eJ>K{<#0_$J#-TJ5BpfjGllGE{QEQ+0L+0zc0e)&_2yLr~}kpIby zpC=!=^F+5jiytl2Kl5&n6AjqwSbhw~@Z+1tjnK|7e*DtOsSf5{Z=4{1`Q`54@Y2)5 zkBYdPSH=sRc7-35*Wv{xuVp}y3(9L%@g=WG;8{TCwWZ{AUN;fN&UJNlqxH93kljN5 z)_Em=)>3q2_E;<%Z zJ9hptTm5NT;gDVA}n5n`Ue!b!1`BwxBh`= z0U1wA$?1693U_o5e!l%-SM{f!ZR~jMnf&smOXudjvD80=@5ZC_1^J)8*!Vx*Iz9_I z(JTIkfyV*qe@V${|GzB-o$JttpZMmNo9=yq{H^PQ{1X=}$bapsb=~hSr2XpOl@hyc z=hiTXS?Y*my6u#t*b_AEa zIse>?u;jBhX_9?kQBi#HI|V!k$oqV)W;hqr0>Xy zxWrq6z8WCw$=a76d9Qdo*jaJ-$cGc@oOT7D z5YS)aRTFm-P~@b)#;x}b(~2+g^btoGbhh_`lGF9)-pDw**Ntrd+~#Mm=k6Hlc*tL7 ztCd&X^wu}rX;J)VI}yJGr(MB=;u*qz_)^{eN8cYr6<^|MqFmRCC#B?cJUfa5&h^xr zYb5tx?ZBS=t>Yno;z6^s+h6jHp9x?5ryaqA{BOhFc5+7*6KJZ0Fg`urHZ&aNxI z#FGY|2V^`QC8z6SXK}!}R$p`FAAWeys~^hWIv(uGcNn!B>7wWPyW-d-+bdUx1W2w z@Wp@H5j@EM=r4@_qe<*Z}e?3-({w5&TW8E?A?qSS^F1lljOV)ULSNC39+a-UO+-K#}zqgqC zx|8IMcBHuE&H3kEgqbUJzZtzA%PGF(D*`+L$oeiRIi0V)U~f3#)2a6zyXi-QYQM=( zO*#CAga5X^+kC}u){DpsPP>9j99)MHhOabnL;*!EXgwBJe2J$Gzx!4^86~IV*+&#R z*XM7&@#uec+}Hh@M8`w^>+OB#pFZ`;k@1jrq->D?UDz9MJ=Rx#iT_pLO+eO1=gmIzNn7j z$Nol5=r_~rKRkBsW~0_Qk9%)h@gDc>aPfb{jw2uBKllB5 zKD(pm^?~Ax|25z(K>8oOI=CJDKpb|iPp@9`<>B@9q5Q4=C;x)2rv3JiO;375_~Jk9 z2p;5r4fe*H*Bi<&@jnN=M2PPcx=K#x-(4s=J}k5DZPUWfZ@9Mjqx~m;-Sqm`&;2;| zQ{jvM>@UP=SMZ>Ca@Uyr6#zvpXj~~NzQhv)o&scj)Rml$XND+tt|L$0VApSLy3!N! zw~mMW#a7rp{n^a(8p4-&Xh-k~0pnugTI2tC^Lh$$qDTB6z|RQi^gplUwEu1gaLQgf z=hV5=w)pBbqDT8r{%vpGe$7KKZu+S3#edonJjnk6?2R|Chkog`bMe1{avjV6xRTTU z&lCro>(|pZU;n=KZaiK7*8Y>f;{zw9s~acX{VT`+P`v1$*9*{J0pz^i7{l)2V#v9k z-75dzm;d$Lee$=qOa2ynF7w!xGaq$tTP1I_Bl40r=bw8K#;^18A??+E4w6)S$yXo# zg+XV1XO*1J*DTm;F6jL5vRT`HA*lA7{L*sApPyU0yOi+7Z`KQO+7(>l;CxQlgZ+We zkJ0PW(Dh!t5>E~CEkMQ-S8_U@Bg6scIk;;9S`}3zIxrU6Sv;eot`8f z+7bC6{~NG3-n`yYeu@7D;1xjn-&bk9Gu?{IS0f#(!nvw%0+WUCjG7%ySZQqQ@Nv;Aa?gw!55?(|MdP1)b|#8~tbV zRd4=$1NmF$k^DKIulaO8y5skRFaEQ>i1$@~g5v4J{?O;g=yg%}Mz6lzb^-Y|Amd3W zIUUcj;*fJ)F!RmdKr&UgO%!GTXbC9-Zj%C8{*o3Jpyagw$B9GEwe5m^fA`$4w;r{hM*f+vT=e2wE47{$S@ECa4RP8PJSd*xO(xG} zK#>bt7gZHs;z+UY?5R<>PUGjgu zS90YmzrMsB!k2od9l<9A%qyu|z40MvU6fIL$yW$?43PC*P;xq7r;1_c8XS7TE)Oqt z_rdbF_M80j9*_3_dhl{r2w(hWy%48e!6gok>x4tt5C7U9kNsRfs`wI56Xm*AJSioo z<8e1I93LiMu>1V)pYxY>#UC9H`Kui`IvoaIW^zx7~Qt2H(xf-`aoj8#ivHsh7{mAGd3VBfi1s|6hP^x> z*Gc6u{8%80o$KDucK+^m|NZ&O^0)Sb{5?`9K7HHFm;WSu$s_FuE_rnRxffyNHXZlq z_q1Y)FZt`hzX2foVM@vA`acWy&Rftu?x(YFxmQr_H~G_!`S(As_}+r3@WpT15j@E6 zw$I+^`;)HXyY&vd4#;{RDmm@|5Lzofb_qq1nh=i-2KEpg#>cVE8B#c#>q+JEx5Ie5Fx?)bkwb`-vo|4{5C|2iac zx5-a}@C<`zfRE@s!q6`jf^%K?lhv<@?KJgF`CHp1|LI-NTyD>w-2RI2rQT^raLJqV z&%FrSK6?S3m%ddrQ23?nwuH_nMyws{JN^o5P+xsC2`F?rpmG z&3X}e!D&};iG$-HVd)-|rwX9R1>FbK6kp;=0nY(4p0<+H@wf{mM|Z#RQ1$hFR=?iZ z@y2uVGb?P6p0;J=E5aB5X-DuN|1(YF|9I<=9OOig_#XkD0HptAC8zzrN(wsHF6-_2 zx2A@{&fGl%g#K`z0Gv|5B06~+kyT8AlDs{drcf8deMHb7J^)}Gk^S| z`AA&;)ON{FetXVA$wRLCv+yNvv?KV0fc9JV*&Dq-Q&oJ)R~mR8knh1Xm7LDkwPM)0 zF8}KayPkI7oWtaA?Kk<8KKkgmC$9boOm<*)6tH+tRHReZPq1Fr*e-8NKm z+HcoU$M)PSPW#dP<%=7LAKGv7&p7^1rz2vfqB?%B5BnzWB}dMLebSOB@`p2$K(( zIMRSpPR1>J9hX&niDwACQP3GrNy+JWZW6`Lwan%d&O37L`xckKbv)#+J7MSPCm(#+ zGQyX5Xh-lM|HBU&|HoU$MIk48#Q!$@>|6e)l$`ee7Afdl=l<)5UtU$&@)`MC`%nJ$ zM{W|i|KWste<=P()Ho$Nx}llKGxj3W(h-^cMlyAFE^7z0I{03cY{o zRcGw_!Z-F5RNEzg@qO3d?VSy_L_2Z5m$$y}v(J0zz}^6m<5}e4;P~B*636xzPd7I{ zVD)8-wjbor-2Cmg{_@!;UlYF6AMFS(_2>L^FT$$N-st(DuJ~^LfENKdAGDR6Zijcl z-qWkEef_eJt>NBh>im&^;cn-|USIWaJii$|KH2$;v`n57fNVb*;9^$$aS!|`Z8-O_ z*B<)6>10q{bJa;vcG(C@%R&;rsZ$l9>|aVW&8K*le3=+U;Ji%h|{j%5(o27 zn0v(JtpF%;LG@5le2FIpJO#*j>Pk+>^Pnhpt_2gn`QPQXdEC97(eaS~ncgZHwN;eL&Bm$3P!i^g7lTk;nac=;Qt| zZqcKlr!0C7_s?02-sk>=MUR7Cw&;26!_+K#75hs~i{8b)U&o?HLGN4i9QP%k@W)%n zK5o>a$GE?1(R0{eOI!2`o(JSCdKb@UiWWTwdc~sG@LZ{G(R+Bl*Rtpl(7P5rgXfzA zi(bNW)^OXOhZde6$1Hjh^rS^E-C)XREP5F9yhTr6Z{$lBy?C9WS1o$$mxkW3=xNZ~ z7QK9}k?&db_BDn+wCKaD4L$OtfgG=rpvNtGv1a5_7QK0up=T|60`!7KFI;Kl%ND(M zg`w9hdjA)O-n8fi&^s2rak-K2TlB$Yh8}tf5aV+U^r%J8U25bK7QIq6^t459{oK%V z7Cj4k(V}-QG4d6Q9tFK_(Q6kQ`IbfRU1aE8iyi@eV9~P|8u{?k2D09J7Z^Nd(IcQI zEqeKUBcHM8&5EJtEqVy_l0`3{XXL9Ey?L&oH!OPp97Atg^c3hli(WX}$PX=g^DIM; z{LVn;Aq0Bdq8HCJaw&@*0X=Kcy9#_$<$4)my^JL{NGLg8{wO$c&n(4Do_sLNTuO=&!6zQ^WyNe4ea;n$Rv^NtEP zoA-zK`;jH+Tj&3N`v%v{R4nqLqF=rS`F)?gr0IC&yMoT;p&c!#&)o^lGx-RT3tT_` z-pI!RMX#K@lb+~*FRBASGmv8rL_SC_&;QEL_3B5~)fG!`UD=g&seK*~^Vv~yvM!~Z z*q8O*0Q~45JbO~_afM5sijYfzuHz70a!LFp{Jtyse1D(cW0NlO5?5nMf4(Rue2I(u zt~_6j`s&I*N6$q5?lkqY9QE*gC7zQu!0#;&#?ZqyW$R)7c7L_fmM`r?_y z-zjE(?Rw(*o9Vfx9N$;WC_NGn>EfTnLw$r*B`^N-+;ER&rv8 z^+`xOb(H6MM9dq{*+rbRD+-m&O$(EAp>#`gawFCOtH3wqR|M?gM7q zCDFKo=BtkS-EYcCy>f0OY(TGl{+oSnCC{bo2KeFV{ls}Q!@UUEPY(J~f#yTbyzV@Z zGFRex6aW6(e>HjY$A5CSdu87y3%a}U?1;91x6SGC@V4&0jl{|ElfM(e{n`;D&L0vd z?GRR>SLDPFe~)5K6x`?4U%fkR)(P(Rt*jS%kf(m`Gad2DaraXvipqXbs5QgCFVFGW zK7TIpXRqBzf3?4du+J~%_{wpSe&m%N$DdL4YWGtU_vq(J4W-8&myR_4aXh5Gt|iBD zljp?+otqTo*I47FeXddZ1usu}yo_SqOTP+AF329oM~+|2L)bb;sj2knagyT`?e&zL zQ}0tao{C->2SQ!rcN~!P3d$uddJOc8MIR#Hd5c~Ky=2i-pjQ=Le&-{3tnsIa_S|AW zfP6#A>;AWrIPP4_u7BKnYaRNq+nsg4S=q2d)BhB{_?LHn;6A^R{>gLlqAwb|>^~59 zfz*@pkAJ%`33)-Zot<57C{&yJvt!nI_{_HjmHt_>^s|1(>Yu4Y{QZ;Xpz(Y=J~!(q zKZ5+^dw1eTQ2!0T4dZgWsoJ)7MDNlP< zOOEHh@qD&L?Y}(N&OQ&$?!V!e{duUupYl0=zYw(-)VSI8pQkradfaguc6e?Y?<1ps z@$w`6o4+@)fh69!&R+8JrT?+sA?|qsGLG;(u^h^AAHYbP|HW_TpL-FOlpV=O^F=Ek z75H(!KOb#XE=X_j0`33k=gOg1J-(X<=9E>TsAUpc~MW-E2;`p6c<)nS3fR`U;TOExm-N| zi|uiMb%)rKan(N0XuR{dnBS7J7nt9RJb!e4+p3)8w+6g#(X+&Ro*v0>_hFOYB=}Lq z7e6?z6Lyftgp!kXQ^CF$$8DYum{D?0yPjNBxcHl7y<7A)`e#GY-S)7R**D>Rcw6zs zk0kQM^TAk8fcFc36 zByMTPoF^)(oV1HP@Pz1B zD*AU5=c49633<^edEvQJJnxG6*W*M`Uc#4p`3=f{-Lk{;p}MFy=D)4vg6y=F9i9Kk z>z;kde;;}h7QF;|TG1u{97l5C=M-Q3;P^o}MEw+%oaE0QN7%orN>0X+mcqr~0_weQ z(L5AwH%aVDJmBn(|E(&N3cC=;h=UBdBe+x>~Ghn`S+_k(3gaqwl8_% zzVpKNuch9~v~!|oPvUKm?l>xOWP!H>>@gO(zbY5DcAnbjA4hOckMg=-@b@cNjxqvup81?CNKX0>eIkti)5Mnn6n*Y&g(#}}F^UM8V_RG{eUY?|0_ z+@h|x>OMQpb5yMR=x;epD}j3N{_@j1g`gaWj#dw zP4HvydG+bo9MwNEkV`5#-}>ztQ=ZQOvPw?YLnVcaUpck|iyj5NY0(>Kw;e^7bwgj_ zlK&jr_xr{l=FilY`9CN=j^Fn4rRwVb{+x`ObyYGzzqAkjJ|Le99dY#2PyG8|Yq_6& zh=1(=6_jVcwEd&sgbm1xoY>*>rzKEu!WyT9*ZIGQ`~8LR`P^tp@ZURX{Y!Q|Ahn^O zZabZ0@)I2x$omP1yFl_p`-Dlzi-5MX77AYa{^wu);SZLm3F_{DTl%?f9&7(Qw~BxN zo9!t**Z4WI|E>IR$Gam9-+msXf8WSmr$P^(2hpDa_P@k$85iwyAr|#HPxb@j2ld#$ z17m+r!G6r=H;k{Q^f1!COc4?Tay4(D>hBA(0ecQF{3 zou7=-Blh@wg})C(dqpJ|WUq|+;d2Grv!5rllpe8XKPRERz9nZr=UCL|34ESnKj*NY zCuBeJ^69p>vw)v%ApI&Sxu87o`Gr02+s_l)N{`sHpO?_yK*>4d<`l|Fe%<--U&g;A zAn7%fOI!2==sAlX2EAy}tEh*HMUR7Cx9Baj-7<~RS#CV&7Tn#X(k|o=;wGo-u@%M#~4+=)^m%xWsm!3BhQO4?{<`& zjLUp(F-%biNDIed`41+oNx5-`3&=`_ZNfmtDnP&9zGYzUSRYwzu}>m zkD&bWcRM6To!^WqC;5#7FIe;*;wdY-mHtBX1m(2_`S7P+e#9Qv zmz%?h*5*$=+TAJaE(`R!Zwv6}yt4e6t6VUxBB=Po=Q2g;WqX6T3xe8P)$)Vu*cmAJ z_P2kw{!fX+z5%pX>1VM`$nhxj#O89Xskd z=g*BipMx-ud8H>PkIAavj-AJbDld8D^An((iF zsiD(eO34M;<8zns>Z7dmh`loG*uQVlP;%1V?E28pg+&j4zan|L@tgHARCQQOFMgnV+1J3(60F_apiXPoLPc>!YspNL*dm;qO4uUPs9V*-N8;^LGyz zpM75u{jcYb*yHa(*uUS9vgG)C3;bP#MZK@cTw&}*uk`Fn9_;&yhGmbxk6{0fL08EI z<)I5Zqt>0)dxo*lZ{6QfmOQz6Kso+i0rQ?#a&ljx&x@CNHV=M9$q9W3KWi4f40_X| z=RogR^a1L^nz7Gy$9VTG{GEkS?Z>)r$xZa~ zF82642qV9@fcuuRlGFDsKahs!TqnjRUYFl+{XOJwSy%A)2RbOXsO##1vLpWRcL4Z% z1B_qaw@CkS{<#-n;#z+{weM?kll*b>y#5HvaUE1razS}7^3U`5dG0^+ zKi+-Kc<1mlzddCyFu&J%^{De3pW@|9@*4u4w&+dh&ndd(m-jVQ@QaEsesEunFaf!W zl9T+{_ciQ44J9Y{HC=^^zje0r#r$z3L67+96T_g#6-^$M^1QW}%(z zcf?n}c(1dpd(NEnQ=ao*L^;+k#9g58YmNZplJ+-mf8f^j9urjb@SN?|IC}C+n&(*V z11G2K^M77r$48&s%{|vf^zi)r@Zu&ft(#1IFzW)TA3mETtio;&Fplz4K;I|14}cun z{hu$`;m%9T?(uZ`KIzA<1*gm^gH=8_>Cqbm6~B0{dkuQoej)CHp!VCc{NQ~O&--eg z`S082{OG1_M1kBVg~KLp>gW7D)_qcVZU21|&(G&M_gqhAp;zn#`5FI}*Uw~KW3TTk zs=Ty&o@;NPKi{zA>d-stoOkS(&>!|QLY{};ywUHMz3z-H;q@Q!i|4!B=dh=hTu}Ut z>-~1@b$dmX7dt$MJ$|z($2>QbT#%hK~aN9^%jbNd|fp^^*AWAP?`Ty}k>mh|!? zc6jbM&j)9H<&<2I9s3+|yI<5*d9lOu!R>Rr+e$7df2mtdJndimp^U8SZ*8UC1!)^XNbXGC*fD?;* zMVGen0D1cy>XecT$^*|CFWv69XXm}F^hh3f9(C*vQ;vCPD7heeeT;`Gl#^g&9I)?i zhf0szej#t4>l|Cgp9h}H%=42M_5L<;r-`EjNWbj++lpn6=P29f9XFL+P#!9G8GEDd zPptdf&{zHO@f=^CbIiQQm7Lt)QcmKK^;R1Ef|3(@7k-v3dLHzuMNfg=u;?AsSKFfJ zK<`=f0s70(qPIbhM7+4g&n)P1i{8h$lCtO}(6bgj3VOk!*D>CfEqW64nnmwmo@!e3 zJm?*ZKE%49Z_ztkFD&biHxGJL(cSNt?nZyZx~dNthkQcGOTXbc&pcmxQO6;k`#h?B zTKCU2%O1~V9y$LR_s?x5r|+M6zVkBw{r(YaZ}7Y{S9iV1b4DY}nY=9O{aXU^MvwEm z2u+i(0U+Za@BW$R$ci4P{Y~Pz-!-M*?LYS#{Vj`L1m0D2xnJS)x-94eAK$yLy;cl6 z*KgO~aIMupPVXRp%Q~Fr5674P-|~`%ywT&di~Ee213&#UtrTEX8By3iA|=oQeDiZ1!(eQg2!jN%84!(qtfm7Me&`@WX#x~$~nzP6!o zX%Bt0^R7iNg5LMjC#KmizUIX(ailgf^L+;WJF55+2k-j`OL#t(#rM^vQKQHYE?{)X%nIBzF>M>@?Q%>r^?RQ6*dg1pOxsS~KeK@-CeDK^Ip4TM$ z#9n`zDbI6bGD=TSyP^L@B`5V(C9c|y(Bq)D$am~I`3-dyF8S;tj|0$kUc^_qB%l3d z{rL<(ZE)sEmkY{Q=Vc?`nC-Q1k+a(;&;1$9@ym_%K6VlBEsCF_kMBEnKo6Qf9A8JB zd&BzSx`O9wl;;{hcn*%(k@_pF=Fi7)Wv?BG9}U<~qdfDKT*Z@Iq9AFDDfpRrfUh?0XWb`xdY{xAn=fpKRw1z*NaT8;Y{8r+=h0aU)@A>69-il7~pZ>D_w~jISuPOf=|0nAHD0$<2P1uJ# z$3fBW_sh6?EoL{NxoB z7r#rgze~t&;m>RCJW~&y0R65%=NrD*^7UKvBko(qWB$04!2j3tdU8sS*biUmw{O3% zP5X6KPV(CXo_)pZ$L{_5xdtEWypf*LBmJ{9 zLVDh}%Z&&*e~29CY1EBi0dft@w z-BNOr|1|I}Anl4CUb6qi?@qS{@xdpSY2|Bw{XkI7-v<0AzV(BTp8nC#*A`UTXJQ=_ zZ=q!RNAgq?=fyAnEXp$jQPh=>Kt8&Uxj)MQzwhW@EzY{2ytdE%g-gCTe$!)bxpL&a zan6SgOD}Z@)Ou*+wdl6{uk+B8D+ph=*P#`U@Oe2o95s)2Xm?$c2a%Qb(Y~+c&ht(g z_bNdy1v%1%8Kk#@eDeN8)l(!t@>ps6HO)6tu&b%`|(WUzz@85>_u70TWIQ?v*jz@6Hi5~HXZJsa{ zH~Gr|^8T`p`$Q=x^*Y?h><^S+HwSs)i+^#*^LxE0`dL-UiJmOh>tn`=`s4R}^uMR{ z{4a6vd$+OTh_C0hABltC@9{fa#*tHUVxRsKvOmxc+bQ=`>Z-ih;rDylWBub&TgizX zjw^(;!|w&{@A&LF*)7iw?%Ars43IogCfB%ZGzI&j&nQ z#{WF#l?>>P5AH=Mh^!lWZ)o>Z`*~7doF8*2$NOOMpO?hp{BtkDlCl#t-_alY+>$oR z6^=9Wq9~Pdlh42F;18639mlH1jnMhS)8GB;v*+$EsKmi}FaCcf{zZ)=4SCTcak8EW z?fNRCp13ZMa#L&l2F;VqPg}|9IC)=$J!rN|eJ+r+%Mm%pzQh&T%*2%h6u%@czV|VJ zowVXhd*R$cScY6q$%$Vh?|tCCCANo>l5_l;TvxdGRY$#b6kYq30KcdBL4LK-FNR7k z$SR=|+{r7t_NxGXQSpQP3PY}<2PNDO}qfV7*pX{2;qc z#SgN}^?g^#iQS0d@*@4Nk9BkcbjFFWUEr>Vo;A;LJJ$Jk%bkDy_H6qsA}pyHSNit^T`{uy@_ z{OFb@Po#@|8J`O$n0+1ISDf+QC7`?a^=EfAptiW`FSRO+OO8*yH_2{M#n(@%-lf z#7f^e{?aYJvA|ou<9?z5J&Wph8uArDWB(2c?>o4U#(vmSdZfSD>u<{G z`A)`(_;*bF_IYt!U-G=T4CI(!u9Lqe1m~K!&Q-7Nw$8T>lfT{kV&AHaa*H~@)qQqG zpI4YEd+T6{lk0KrSB=E!)8oy@D~p59_1;DM_dh)O`rG7h@t6Bg$?uwcEULd*$QwP* zcdus}|G1wt;?Fyt-_AHSg>q6(>Y)ZbZKY4fP1ZvR^sbNZ#kIO9a;}RPJoASM!-J2I zza=itZ;`G3x406JH+sBtrb5>GSFbZ9jv~tGbEWh=nFYV5^gCnDsPSunIGajN>f2sd zu>QMBPUeBo)+S!@U;K(dUtH0(UmdiUq~Ztpm4{qL$p!hvep*m+;#XDS;#UazT8i%a zh4*}#=+_;^7r&f;?nT&FeDNnT)r=!-f1IboDK9VLPh8>JZU}ZWiXUV*r}#m3InR}p zoY<}T@ladg(r!~6*Fk5T2-^iR@3z)6^UDA0dC-w~b0`Ak9nsRRBscVXv2 zXCPmIeD+sQAG0XuL9?8W)9uGt2k<#F{judZk1{WddLDEKehvY79&~J5uf53nA+e9i z1D_k$AfJYut|#%k1p0XAK{GDS!_4!dp1a+JouG5KrQLFWf^e+!ukCnSyZPe{Z)ft6 z1hnHVfWEMJB`@q3?O&r^1?Ywu3dtK>va z1nragu=geH_xsq7V%vLu%eb5ZuHRFT@i8&~0pI&?c~wsAcT)bm+4eavq_HnX`!%IU z?6-j1=N0$A`;gCmUzH2WcZvKRy!a%aMbsDVGrut^2Qz$2S6o0~L6K4WY=;Dvv zu2PC0l>avDWR+Y{yJEhJO3t1C6)t|Ips#JwJE*^|q6hgqQ2Zc&8_*Np$*boee|bL} zS90QSM&WL~q8}73dJ6QiqC4e7HHFLgAAwvGbjRmWm#l9hx0-zg{$4WIa|e8~+5;R@ zSy1E$xA^4;(7)9V_pG%j`w+B4odWgxgTIpyBo~zT%yg6QBB1D#d8@vhzkSERuL0_O zh<(-z_ZisUMISGBzv4vyK11^U4S#>bbvKXP=W%@$+u8WV?>DGJU{D-G_?1FAkrTf- zZgL-CJioY)kh^@T=kf>ac@Fh(UTXf2epMjfRes6%(fhtXzl*w$5Z}e?AEGB_eJ{VL z_umDjNBT2{%{EV zjN*%5Y@dXA#TS3#lT7~EUwQvkR&wG`UE$hp9`)H#{2;qM#SgN}b!KQcFK)3L^W&kk z!lhle(cZJ5Gfru*yrdsjzv*vh&6Umiq;j&^@6hF>J@Nch((T{NV4nCMDc@IXDgPu7 z9Qz1I)&tgaVV-M5d*R)^JV?Gc9(3?s3+*M8ocLW2`{Nw79>98q>rf-COLNVh3{ACe@p3e{fAwCuR{L^N>22ItlvGi{bzsSx|IGWGhV(H#ee%bFTcN~ z|0Si*_1{|m(f@{$6aQ zA>XT{9s7O2rYbLXxQ^p`kMEOqm0VDKw8QrR$9pd?wx>Tn?u%ydULNgcl-$DX7O_4Z z^hMFw~lcjkN51DXTEPnyOF*8@p8YE`?s{4QgREk zTZUbp=RcO+veGB<@;!w#{H5Kdl3SSFJnY)Pe{9Da+S?!R$omS|*QMQrl9PEd16;qy zAoMQ$D_Zh7&?^?bkNT@y^aAKDi#|mA?ppK;=mU!$1wFiv7pM5y!8j1J=vmN{7Ci!b z#-dj-uI4Rz2K16ekK;Y~szvW%K5Hnt+$XdZF7t2&ay`(UHZbaP<&H4(EuSX_t!qV& z^DEc!yx-PJrJZqJC5-NC@|gk@d71y48~VrP;Y73ll!u)5*BQq{sl|-^$o!+euakbj zbw1}~`lt7&g8XCq=lfyepUfMb_s#pi^dr2V*Dk~!=YP)Iw3kqFZush#`H(#Ea_=AU zJr(z1`MuVL2kg4a8$ z^2zUF2)Vz@@1X{;GuHP|pFz2rVjA>Q&2vu&zkXfynL3Go}hfv|Avy2ymg3M`OJYnB;Scc z@)l}y!=Rh6U43jHlQy{z7v<^x1eyzZw_*0&~=_97jnt|6wjNO zfd^63_Wft{@;5(!*yjHj{AY%@oICZN%YJ6_j{^UN=XN{)$l23p3SY+K&<{;qgUd}j z=Xc4+yghdU`@YD^CGtJ^OSu@zZ?pUHEASrGNE`WUQcl`?>m}XA}?{1PssI<-CykU zD5E*AA4q@UK4cpA6RfY4B^L+(e|>IKrrrhK`!GS{a>KI6=R~}}r(azq7nFxO?D0NS z@+J1{Jj7=B^T7QCKHs6ew2~8hY-fbbH}?_j{T#c!Rg^x-Klc-OpHI6jB`4!m54e7= zB=kJ!;e)++gg!)`Vivs&deWljK+h<;w13`D4$%JciXW8!668usPU7VET8xkVyQbuv zadvXskB0^dm;RPvKRCqSUmagYE_Yq~-v7V%M3T@y-g_eK?|I1obJz91yRi2}vYQ#d zs*qoMi8Bsgl=nnfZX`(O56K7DXIwASA6t&&)Bt%|)b~V&@H2L($v58y>R_O$a&CyE@1D=)RZ1Q4|4vcy|$7QzwP~} zv3{49^C|U2W-Z)re#bUyzx*@Pf4P60ReHp4d%rw~aiFB+WInC|*WdLCJpp>#lJ6t# zo<%Q$KD6iw&?7(c;&k#A%ESK%_;JM#s=qqhpOTX}YsZ=Kjq!2am{W2xf0q?5@s*&j zq3GJL6!t?iL(s3DCmrXF`77> z{mYw;U)(R_^ZGk4`^9A(!&t_>zb^XaGtmF&nxFrUb0Fn|@=ZIG5h!wO4}-VNeNm8{ z6T_(SwE_EG6~EL^IOflHiToo+w-2eG>YjdiyMDM{;5^Ry$wHsR5u~U4ws)T={ebHM zd%wM=^hiCofH&Xs$_u>+dSA)A^*`5N|8el6ppRAmTqk#M&N279Z~5pyGbhI+D({l| zxA(g<(Ers5{nr<^-`(BToEKGs{1czdnHaR+&Gkkd`|vF1dEsBb+5T%eX)j#I5cXi7 z`{Ln($=g`_;sv~4%yoPNzn&bM zys*4ipEvD#2>DH~_;Srf$veyGd`f)m2e$uOE-3HWADcWg?%eqZH_oqdfnm9=V=fSiVG#`!W1I=CSh1xq>ha zdj+3e?>!EVqm19qFZB>|9nJSRm}kBh(zonz9m;W*b|Oc6d64|Yf!piQ7W8G5yyTVd zQ&qvwE5785?`@2iSH5Slu)K;sz8AsYdmC$B`>S*O113B<iVpyq5;Or{vvsj`zc&pbr&a z`YHV;jHBL4$VcQDzn}bl1Nz7DE}`U{{y914$3ta>OTG0mPE|qYI3ewpm&~V4ocG+r zd6A*hOx!oEyZ-Md2An6#?@sxBW(WGm+n3|>?9j0$-bMYcC;|DP?}{W&u4fp>qVA*d z`E>tH6EFACDzGOxl671$YQ}TUzd7)mfI6?@&j9p=eSai*x4%2$KJ1+D47b%fjUUc) zC9He-oFZK`dHm1%m;aSx6zf&|;5x=GM;U=4$91pmkCu~mOdEuC*zW*}yyPqXod0=F z5&R*bj!o8$nUfxMzo(J%(ofmmIsfsT;>>aWe!_a^JjVQGTK;}pMmfEo<<486HziW@@LPfkcDD@(K+0Sb_mOakrd>%!6LnRl~j_l_(BliC6Z%3&U{Q2a%fcs&z zmsfI9U-6y&^~L#``&z7rhAJoVRzLQ?x70twt0!rvBlA1*#C1vE(qsQ#arh;_9?sW% zzmvZ^lsM5JFX!tf-UDU4Vf8(JP<}a2>UB#{eby{{ocH-2ChfJATu^&W;`@84M>kJ+ zuaWOnQcvV0FTNnZIj?8V_3{{iDyxN&o6=TA%^pX*gx#w^UM9j%cuCobCgETe}Z3SB`4!x9k@PU zN$5$?JC=L|c;BMe81KoRAEGA#deox#(T)-py$E{RqGv$QS@baIMT_1-Kde~vGU#=S z9tFK+(d!t$x)!|z`oN+mK@XSwd5C}>Q*>v1nwV60P`m75{>dmgsbBl~E$923l5_M= zF8lFNL*X+2$DqFjy5qyBOV%sV8_oX7|LZz&2>s)&6M26T|EbB}O4khs3wwSWUcx-T z%|ia}N8i4AQJ&wjoDNp6hq%8$e{8vt^#}5@sO!!q{Okd8-5EZ`YcH~n8XVwXca|v+ zIbBcUcOLYGtvf}I?Ib(hyjNBP)bU9>q<+GdnWIV|dxAvb)q&tB~oMGTqK*pitlsqS`-}NY7W&GsxVO>t*uzv@Ha-vuI zCG*QT_&Xt?)4VvO-}Cnvq?}`8)cQINd9IH{PVC$7hh~*tvClkmUCek&N>1`vBd+o& z^cd)E@*TUfj_N5~^4mdPhoI{`iLY`6#l>^68tQk6q#nZCoAypU!-Q#{iJzIgkuG}0 zp9X$UO>l{OWF3xmHrI7!lxMl(zsz{Sa$FB`{l#@$OO7`>^%C!Q zhf0rIKlr|c>mk}J!f(+RlsB$VxSkU^X%F`A{p3&g+L_qnI?i4XRg|3MGroz*x9F8} z;S0?=B@W1ZcCB*l|M>ISzSxxO12VqI8J=G{pWGL*^Etf4=!yQ^K3`&5PfqHY?TIja zrN@{0weKG?WiOB7cl8%Wz6r?thk_*+xx&aL02!aYUlxCOe@_^NKUu^fc@@9x`@x=N zuMInW%U*ba=fBuv+=NlYK|A*Ev}aU#H-7ln1Y}$VB`0-!F>TS~pyw=l6YZ{O(JP==EP5RD zxU}%S?TBEqV;}fkn?*@+FI2 z!#G^E=)H@KpACy10ljU}`xy6o7QJ_Y(KEE@5zr&&`14T4eQeyKH*t<`%A$ur&sy{{ z?u!c+y@~txvPJLXzPo18Q=m63dIRxxEP4v`zD196UOd+yZxQ<;QH$Qex*%cEyV!qA zTl6gGIg38P{!h`OS3$2>^f>5si(Z94EsI{pzE{_x=RhAQx~wC@=XvqVIx!2qG0>f{ zYSg9gOZZ+4fA?1l2aR)C=(X3AaqIV1yYHFrv`PVfh~Lc*gMasu`>dSjyDB~@H~7e3 zZmjiWq@wfUeP7M>BKP$Ne=z+?;+A>V-cMiD^<6>P6F*Z!zn^2R@0wP*@F)IqW3BH7 zs+`Ot_WF(SB|BbxLG>BO`paJD+Ih&F|NoKpEpXFSWBb$dyl)MnAu%aTUucrU_>#sU z2BmR`QGX1fN%{<95ltvUYxU})c>-@P^J-?lfN*LzdRl!KnZzr|0`AIJOeO-)lC`uXE{y*G6|I)D6K z`na2?Xl&4rY5eW?W7CVH^I+)@h5mqE8dv+{?}DL=tEUXd>zz-B{VU?o@5h>k59C!y z-w@fxI5ejXZgY_WJfsPIY!|)Q=SnAIPhH)|G1!%D$SRTRi`7i?*{V z>64VJeynfG#r0#^t)U%|-(mRyq2$jDpE&#G_(hL2LB@c*!1&JfB5}a$&`nF zm9C?25UL-m8M>ezm&QEzL;HLE`L-#`Cn;a!wZ7pK=hr#u{eI3LuO&Vf+6}$CEH@;S zU$cfTPF|Mu{VzoQ7`4yu=SqeTGro1fw2ZPd@@ zJ`wr}@|x7MODOxwh7Rp8w@q|DIzf3ELiKYUQx5$5%pVhq|L{(p9$$9)cL_z8-#(;^ zvpexsS8k*JC;Q2e5A-VbT)8Tt%g+RPK0({?iPL*{rjx%>`<@s+ zi~3@@E}`^Jek!ytPF{-iDf$bYBc4O6;@|LryutrDJtu^cSNG^zK*yaLNr z2qkZ5=um&bzr|0mMSsbD|2-)6Y0v&X?I)C+oS}mp&D#r>NIyI;>Tf?z>V^;eJz}|; zC$D4Z;^YnK_vSaE^8Dw{)bN44BI&DyvM=?S&<}C)^5;4^8$EZ*h7aT=&UWQ8gp$`V zbU{D4RdlGQ#d_)Hl$84q74KJVd6#Fsq$lk=J$#mYCLX@eesAvKYs9BM8}&ni_^gK?^LbS8@IB(o z9==X|&BG^&Z+iGPpUWK&pC!KU;rkrVj68gi_^F2xu_p1#AiJGjPnh7 z4?iTnkYYjoPdAv9yQR z`dH4xYkjQf;k7tm@e zgnq#LN!FyX?$ssV0`VG0Ee2Km58q$<`?PZZ<@ny=v1eSfRIt?8hq1h!zyGUF{x>x5 z_qOGjeLeNNx%rE(^y5CDgZKH&>$b$u`}=^#EO$inu=BTOR_mkhDYf4;dAig8(2IZe z%WYGu>9zk>`#|%g|H$3H`}XaUi*KY>3c-*1?#-98LKOTF=SO|F`KEL4a>*x}ILz-HF)$31(QY`HAq(`UUt|xLVOmV_@8~3 z-6H>uzRTAB`~m6zx!W_Jz20}(+BZKV{T}D@fz|E2Y;9>FT*IsXLx?lYtDo@aiG(E1gA9}>Ub{sMcB z=tJ26-}>m+-}`Q#z4{Z7Yx56a{zL9^%{}h^=l6fg&p(j)hyQW*?6dy#$!(q9LB0N; z^V`ZgEY~Zy{AzrbVjHyhAr1Y`dVl&_$023+Pm3vIm?C*p09PL*E*N8MQZ83g5+C4`#t{(ir(KkIh#h0GX`tGu8{04b5@4Qag4SgU_{ZEO_eV52{?>Tj-;ZA0Eoy(^8&UhUA3gnc=LgkS)6gMK zx=h>q*MYD6l;u47>BSB|_3$;~6K98dfX`@W#=D14vwY6OkLa(WhwljsZ; zQ_G|m&nd=tmw3e&>Q6t!dF?5lUq9~l1;yQG3;R;6Z+pH1`a}Po*3>znUl1>P4k=#Z z&cy`(BFlAN>HH2|!Qa0xvu5}s&eYEeW|`kKbkIZhuu8t#L)Xxuza5!0^lI+!?3sJ` z!7dJ;JU6r#^^q}Y)W?MNkS9K_K0v2_MCaCPys0_^guN;+STpiaum1UeIxnytBOm_N z{ikZ@Q`!Z2$WQTpR^=CW4edp~?%`E_*UQ&E!OBnHJ1h@-)E^2?sb}&$N0%im5<)N3 zXMy*&YMw*>s~S4gXD6CY3{4t-?^E8Gc=;7_^t1J&@7A^NPc(qAM{y{a`lhqP|8Cvi z&o_9rYkzstTRjk0)7M1z?WrI3zgusyJoG{Qc9?FD!*-QRY+X5TtA3fo4+s-KbLpYs z1Nqh0M&;{V41L$G_4U;GVf{jWhUxOJqVjc~!kl_lE_eAI!lL1W_lYv~+XIFLzlT2a z%rkGj{BaHZjr`mzT=_kL2!4m2_nB`zV5#s&{Jm(0C%gO}`D*!R<1_T+^_XAg_t$afT0q{aeP`x-?ZxweY3(WD zI^fGne>>C{_!RMJ4?m?Ja~{4!e9^<#iLV$u+G~UQw-}Fe!aV8ghTgV^Q(#c=yU(-A z?|i|jPdONWBTfgT-)x*#Ul)zj`%F%Zhq6&Tmkb~HLHkks z{ULQjhj_B|BnLjXez-O5rdH6o417T3`d-`(@?40`e%YTf&ZM;7jh~Rhdt8V=JE1rAYmG~R|zxKKG z$X9WXeEkp?!N0{%aOCNs{{JG<9bLKe@4tEAb|)dZ=>Nax{38B}(>445*GJox_QzUy>xF2+Y{nM`&YDITzYg2AJA!kiuQ|dw!LWoy1zfgZ!f9uhj9XV+MnX@ z7tb3y)Pu%Pf@$s-*{HoV3?InT{**q;%MV>chxQ^m_!sd!Wd6+10bf>n7}^E=lzvTn z_yO@b58q&Y6+L{N^c90gd(nQG7UOYFm?wSR(8F$j-;2h{eKQV=^RxDstn%|X`kbA5 z^8EcXnqNx&AoLU3sorl6g`$}FezCmpr>A9^ne1WCcV zkpuhv{VuY9ctzMw;`nI43nZbP`QLR;Jvsh97q$E34@0|y_*m9Cc9rD_K9MC|DN3Ih zP)^n01AP*`Z@GHtFuxJW5B+<%b5)}F_#6f{ogWj$493S;JY9HwzhxP^i&X$5nL*Jb0-NO&q-s%PqecKOl^Ei6H zZkc@O;qU)ZJ#Ewv%;?9B`hl4zZ`D4b3tf9lUl`hL`+=iSQNi!;J0CInP2s9V*dk7~ z|EI!on~l?kkpuhveLb?@_5+9?y^q>`H>i(1_sh%-U*LyKCx2q?3fpIw`I$(5*glVQ zW+yIq$2H&H>ypOrk%Zma=Tm06&Dvczau)UO?eme{8?{gE^MO8b?Q`nM@%Q(reI_po z{epHA{9F74?Y^Ff|4ljgIm>j-!w;xO)8K9U?J&P%@}Y;?tze#XeM1-5eiheaLx=X8 z7=?B&;)V5|_3%Tslf1!0-_f0;?YCs|p@+YpN%go<`_+D?joNR|lecO=6Wj0D(AoBT z0_$~jhqrv`ho5-q^N>UwYoAi)V&|XD#&Lo4j?e1-N3!3x-?;eF{v+^-i{qXr$KQ9P zI35`~#HrrHOJ{`R2-N$Gbm^Z)&frn+dX86_UyS63{luGKK=9kS{n4K+9dKJ2 zf5X4p@6=$q&HA@vo{!LvH`T=s9q}P5b`8Q|i;_6ZRsbIJD zf8CUW|4U4_J^YmR_6#2W*K>Zz{GrK*9_k+iE2Ntky10Hq?I&?*Xg~UitVu)PIongo z!#9bq7(DdtJSN&t)J;D0@b{0Y9yjVIv=3{eeq!v&^Y@u)yq~x%wA=O*??eR#zq_Uj z_xaIdo_r4eMjSWKba7N|nXg`hRNVEZPD0ooT|LUacMClVb zruzmD|EV8H5kE5das5D-c25mmTtA@pksOD5qaVnbH1y4|-pU@n$M#k=c<4L4XS5$^ zn0)Br?=w_AY}5~E-`ht0z{HccYQG}K3(3nvyKO)4F$7-l`}reZKf3V_&ClU)#G&>f zmRN4Haac2Q7WQ+$Uye}rZ`2R?`wRW|{)s2Y-(RRWP5dIX8|_^4Hf`<;guRP;CtWd0 zpXgIg#o%o_Z!^Ch$q(E4ry(Htz50pQ?e^FEG)~6f@UQkK_E>JS{v8=P@UQk0YTu#! zyHPtIbDyHqCm0Vf-6fR&3crl^U+bK3yaE4JNY{+gC(=xJ4Boc$Iqm72{J3`BBHhT) z#kF(A|IE;#ou_{lu_KXXy%juspY5q+@X$B4CECubCLj9hdw9Vv-!G~hKeX6?w8_6= z%EOMqvg5D$39X-Z3?1y4m~`Oxr55KQl2=6RTdHtAGVS48oX^jB_zKsriXMK#b?1t~ z2YMvxCXINmkgi31;FDFq#rF`;c6KUX-$!Y_M0mxe{Gji-L~p;R3iR13I+Q~^&Z$S{ z%Fr*+J7?0+dq}z>@m9VJz&e8Vx9D7Q-P^YN7a#JfEg4Zd2zvj%yaxGS@QEYdx8A*N zIv>49`tzQ0c_QxKHhnMS>t!_wY*`hTItN|%v88_P{Ik}5Y!ja6r+auN)GN<&)?e^v zo%r?c!Gm5ZCzyVASWk$PR52PSwO6=xnNf_~pnWd4_+7R5t#!`1zROcTnVE!g5jO>; zUl;aoh?}bLfrDY^jCwSPmt54U4boZv1@*bq zXMZca{0M&NFMIs{P5pxGn;E&5kNRbwPnO?1DlX*r{BOg!fc^SzQn1T%y5Cvjw6(sY zgx-kL={=%x-7s<%cD>5QoxTgzzLKG#L!3^T_U{EO6QBBBs6Xga#Agj2aa}NJ#Opxy zN4)$G{q?is$A1P>ANc+J+I?@k^KO?v27lZ99r+>Iy&rV;%`e~Y2dDY@J2C%+onLhD zeZP6p`;m|Sb42+%4@u9(S6_eZHktzfEqw>*x1Cto6c<}g>z`U!q)Fh6lbG~d!Ko)f%>S8=EJ_TtUw9UNz;z5^Hi zm~xJK>4WCJozO%5iuNg~oNNOObXqmPqVrwzSBG%~KeTs>#&44O6+&wt;=S+DZ}z+L zzLAUg9W(9kQ%d|k)DQMHMMu2VM>fNbq}Lx6FLd`f$Bjc^hkvfE=)iL^4n4}XTlGgP z=iVCqg7&s#{U7J|A?fvfHux|4jXhj{sr%Q*hA-r+p4E@Zp2Rhwf8fWA(&qUFe24ss z$`9nCf2f!={97Vjo%neFE^n9rgNu`Y_uiTw`ERrjOy7M@NWalpUMh z2e#JzhBeAVeIov5TxZa@s=)j`k!#)?@|okIQujnv-hMg z`WfkK?1LRc;RE@wqsH_kMjmv;4|?Xj_k{c_ot|;~CZOlaxcC^?UrSFrU$UU%_;N(3 z_r7^4^f&CO{lTSYuMgiBf_PlD52H;w=#6q^^0E8ZQO@6AF*4;)ZyFN__Lx64bkJY> zE2Ou^`NKIZxrXLKZW+j`LD_M8oz%Vz1-dBDgDca z5B#h6(!L_eYZyA{ozA=WTk+{}e*=86h!?NjX*@hMeB$&LKfRZMALQkp;{2%m)GV|g z^0KtINVszUnW0;>SEg-y1%67s8XkRz__l{{?CRwAJbaGyLl0kIdz=_N;%sixh_eaf zD|MseFMHt!{p|aO#!d3?H=cBKT78P8*ZYR(i{yXvncu!*z4wjTb*?{DIq?JxbX(Pr zXT@%3T%JN(hTm;JkbZ&S`je%CzTko4Cc^uYbr^LzObPOmxXcfZ3)FIms; zJ=(EZzt1_Zk$JK6pZs3FIc!I0zr+2be$O($L1^O{e(w{%zTboK&AlC8l^>n4{`-5| zqu=QLAfI;rE8G&=6W4DQvM%3$Ui$Y%HVvP}bI02!F8zCk4*kSPX)|61zC!$5`9Ywg z|498c)EE9tF+WSZ{DpR*AL3Z+2x{M2-?-tid%Sux>l+pFKlAC0$FH}(q5hyn`u*P2 zIB_%U8`4WU1EM}OuPdnjKK-?D}8jVk_ zTPf~*zCH3?e;q1#f4NhXuinSw`K~?>LH$VS;_!JC7mu2E9U40LThDyKHuDw#RgR-j zKX{H-f9mwryjAmWHa>&u=^bbkWwTV~!z;F7Yf2erl z+Wd*mpKG;ae|}f*(fLwnZ(Ka7T?+c`v+&?(J!bzI@%&rCrmXiQA&~^t^T{zYq5e>Eis@YPdLV zQ?HHMWzCbD_1dN6b_^Zjb-=X$o>?S*>d|ME{#U3!_;l!>w1=+~pY!ku;)@<$=bTgw z9&ukcX~g}A@!ldnF7AVM!L8ks*l(Wb{Q3OzUUAoLDz0T<98$fLn;%eo56SPk51(-M zQpwTjf6)8qvrb8W)ivilVYwhm2SM+j&zeqrZ!ypEr;Gpfo4E5<>pMDqilj^MedEmD zpTD|w6X&zmS?)*AyzruJGpqH{xJ&J-OZq2VboC|MZQ^{^G3g(F-;=i{z4KY){HgK% zMMvN1wM$+l#rZS8jq}g*9`xmcf9`6WKdYp_X1|~QWQ)fiaiV@ger=Q9dL}5gs-IZv zoYtW!kAAhuahKlnlFXkGT9wehso&80hUNq8_lbyGozp6P4?OpZpKdkhvodndyzrLu#0EadD7le%sK&51Ox+d_8yjhAybLEfbT5UYegy zZVl}QUh~swgGasROd9pxq+g4~uT}54Bcp!Qcuw_c%fTLhyt3ANhx!BgU*rGHzIUuO zUhv;L65EFUfqtrYjTa<0XXsFW8kY;|eW%LjxyA#C=eYNsy5YBocW?Y5xm}OWA1`Pe zZ|^@`@bkynykE%P9|k)ATsFz|?;+CrfMC}f@2tERyv9Ah{d<-C_k!wnp5IxnOsF{O z8al-9kZJ!s$pY~+k3P+GG8xJPpBep{@$f_9^B%rLe96O)**>ZszOl0#cQrhGkMwO1 zKfK8Kt!MCPmqU|AyKJ!hgm~M&5Nr6MKW^|`a^<&*ZaqJ)KVHO(*WbpC)8V(`9h@IG z>TheLgFfJ|cBS?#{_{PeLj%%2)M=%M~}MLy>ll6MT_1N~{v zq+z%E)3S$Ge_Azo)LX-(QEzGL(I#H?0{`fTaZ_*S|7^Z~ME)Di8&`&|-%i}g+5POZ zKmC^V=8X%~D@Xe6_y4~~#LXM4f7keRMUIRNApD{JUG{4HX~+UEt{(3dc6ag8q8^%G z?lX<@i}>gF^o4ki_5nuA~MdGU-K0|!N!|NWZwujd} zR6P%`d#HvUe$IA2@$fz3=N?}7P^In`^+V<)*M74eUiVNHJiP9qDtma{Lsj$eRqE69 z@VbYpc53hTuavomyP!&DA?xCu9_#Ex6 zdwAVL)$;IDKEJviUiVN9JpAabuD-?|UiVPVJiP9qO5Q!{2i-%J@$kBbD(~TS4^_#- zx2aFn!|NWZhKJWZRBeODc(G^F7>~5+mm%>%pS0=+Iz3-?-mS*9mN>3IOYG$Q;g4I! z505@~2YZ~qm+;+;;Tfu67jbF;WPYT zhwy^>ZVUMsj}IObjjPsP?z`<~3}4u*_Xy2zYCLAY$3h&9rLXx80(KmJni5U*Zba~#PNHB^mlo~oBy_% z?;WI<)g-WG)%Om%cShekOeklq?;Xl}xcbriQjhe>ot+=8zu?az@f&^b(91^aeR`vN zubA!R`fvy1gZaL?3z zonC5Z>R&R34*g3pnoiVA8h+}Le}j1WLB0gE?M&}~YG)7n^jAuoX=i=%f6y-v+Hbvf zrtjURr2k^_wYzMlok=gNH~gvjPeFa}rgm1`)%kU;b~fhvzS>!u^ff~3uZ2H}->986 z4~xcC`2?3%TtxY<{{BbxKI1$z?1sIH8^KY|wOf5R06MhW>aDIn*Y`Y?dq?BTZ?~1> zoqkP^PU{<5_mN(9-EBR+H1EHbUUN^L#w(halwO(pMD^GFrN%YVYqG2J2js1%*Q)gZ z&tEN1Ue8+(kY0U52YH%j5!Cua)0>}{KL*=H<0Nt4sGa`$g5oG==+M8GnD)O%7*oHx zM_(nr<>3p&cRl=w^)&GCUE;?cK2QA2;4uzJW~_a|cQ~ZW5Fhw()err2=TT8VH9z6z z&*Rz?;(y@Liw?{&o>70Q_2kNVZl1Sk^b7P|lD|IHu3;Vh8o7vLJs;GL)DPFqb89jF zV>!Do9OJ3N_Rg;(<=-!~3wo+v*V7YpdLH=S8Tt0;xhYtpym~}#cy5LNzGI)quxrS2 z{=UNCK(WPpdPn&Y{(=AbJlM#t9@mZ6vkUfX-Pr#w%eP<8CBf|doxe+jbwZRw{p$Sf z^`8Im!-(bVI`E=?`Q2iN`E$b`@g+S3bM#Y^bg2i}cnIQ+-&HHl)P8b?4&&lVG@WRg zH2hU(ytRq9?L$7pxLEtDw60&QyYar>zRYW|`@evpg$>@eMZV^|*eH2DoZ`tI?L zZsOq^#Lqo^p7>NYtY7d?5uY`9JckP=9p}HvYn}YEp@Y5teUYl4s-Z)?w4&)m-=tBm zCF(yU-ufLr!w>Z}cyx4}l1sU9_?qkd>?d#UI9B70F8dM4NBw6%5S3rvGxRU~p?;^x za@t4PFm&LfbJS#~KYmibr0>_Ye{g8{pgyNe+waEFFRZ%%?t!76kgxL^*OIUPPH`;x zMZ*X3t4!Pb3nAa%zuhwB0-3AYXO{V0LkEBA`vu9De}{$+@ijAP=+&WL(tCw=1D_*4 zYw&UYDn#>_b1#Ti}RPB+jBz)e`OvN z^^5kq7d^c8>6Q&X&R;c?4?S{qH}9+OoAf-f18^8GkUJ|xsT&fgvK$r!r0IFf%0h7NI5HEHOTCcl=4@3I~`1`mJv`u0tJoW4!+ z85z1beKl^L89L~jerV_q=&SFX3Lakj%}WL!luuMm8qci+`;!Los#nCVei-NUPU3Tl z-}P$0`C8{&wLJPh`Ny4ah3BGwzSNZT@#j%3EsgkncgJt@1SDaX{8!95 zf9X3(*#wC5%~BtC?Sr3yCw6|?BQAQt^}jnE`QW4Xi`E8wa^!O-6byc~7k}WJ?|s$M zqwqKQs2>}XkH(A0*AM#C$mh;P&JQ{J;%@hi3$_b=I3CD6Y<;_0tbJY?LhPBYTrAicm2uAI|zt_pMCEUeVhEIzqT^0~yr}1vo*P5*n;Si0r}mo(u6)PM=Z@x+>-;VmI^elgd`EP?yYO)5PvoQj z)pM&zKC-`V=r$w2$#Jv)J+&`?VE975*0FOZyXU9m&kdcer!@DwitfQQC6&7RxcG;*Mi|DC1k zWA=y8Evbk)gA8J`xHAzvHI+RId8LOTUZ1VW;jz zP3Lc)oq5tbKEXK_A9VGi`&Ffnt*>C5v{iH{hx%(suHk3vuR?r3k{`z5eqa>*?tabe zgv2W{i^nqTD)9c*nfMhA-;R|NdA0Y8g6P ze~+iqyIyeQ`A`4)$!|e&5vLz^a>p#U**KjWInYPU5A{`el=F|hm(|u+ zhWS-O=xOaZ0EpoCj2Ha#rQbQ=iFd@`utWEYbXab)b_|Rh*r9tVgT{%MFVVCaPm{Lx`Zs_nH(lKf1)nh#k z4c_XNXa3ma$LTdu) zo=;sv2faony@*fs_a1)0=UsBY&@QX*Y#;Z&oH6-v`Zh_IH*|6OYTQvabkMh9($F_e zy}AZ(^~ycm>D4#+ae58+c61{{7pIrTV>3esz0!{j{Q|w(93K@te46-@!9!o|Yb$eH zSvC34H~6>s2{ueV^c-*N#uaL>S|{rmI_NntX)CwK_nfK8kCQt$`EhbJPn~{T=nu%v zN7IRlNu&Qt^L?#GyzHde3t-2YT91{zU)}fqm#Pm@8T&pU`Y!o@=fVRn^v9XdLw?iw zaw;dDfbffC3HB~^{bRBa+Ku^xly}bQnDTR^vv$Itnji4jt?YMcLA|Z|zHPJT$MuYU zh|>|%{`qlD;^&4wsK-R=@u7Y2SDE=);;lXMS@8VYs&fqnJeT3R=bv}eQo&K6o`zp` z@vHgF3i+L|`=!?}d*>j4U+%wLdlkP!zW29%bbdn|zn=6vZl7J3Dc4Eod*%V|9EK6; zME{u`Ub*9z82bMHj=n+q#1ouf&VJ?{J{fmzL+(dzU0e3$NWcASzH(^XxecWsI(ogw zR!G0&0nfN~y>lBHl+z;p+b=8KhI1S25A~*Y+I=tk4VLri)E@L*xb*Sq6t_ADUUphK z)SJFO+)X4|- zq5Za)_Sf+Xd>&{%qaQ7|MgH*RYW}Uv`8>&;Maw6W2RM7|cUyR#l=%ICm2ESc<5h_U2ngvzVEJ(zWn(gy*h5c>`ENb4z)Ac2nhdceo9c^ch4X1 z`cv(L9Z(+1A+CFOasJVFL@nk|32j`%@0kOgKi2z>2=6uee&_@~jQ4wUjl%hARm65kY4=d&&$8~nsdYxwD@8C;qR->y)v{D z?N|Lvk@GX+mwU4F3;3Y_Dlu*M=>wl6zq+Bvz8dw5Q~GrvJ4x3v^zfh7`_r#p+kc?b zJpGV#o2}=uTOkArdV!h=%A1Py@~uWHgxE36HkrUnb0{XS<+=qew_Rk*H!X{E>6DMUD?nHGd)gMjUFrtx7&?`A7ABZxjrEuYdi!KXlRI z_ggHxgOBEEdh76stM@AX&?B4^7RaYbI3k2>@KN6&sP#U7z0JR$pipxD0w45)6Rz_m zI3KS5r)ucXezcCX8wv)$n{(Uj^@Qgg^jrK5``awvW4X=F2ak*#=u>^SYX?n2>Eq99 zr=RKUnEo<+PT_q(>qv9*Eszd+T08C!MDQCI-}r$yKmPoi@i*+yJYb#WHfu-Q$cd|; zCdVcII-h_4*u?Nz)DPD|6Yp_$${)#t!+NxK?FmDI-*ZlS>wfoq@mYuBZ`jpi`4Y=* z)~=e71AVeBr$>=c`q=sjo`+jS2l*I3^vP#p_}Thu6F-aOhjI5{FbaNq-|eZ_efQd@ z--5qkm)2pkhd6(1)~+Jy!6&Z1v@Sa~<0y=?{Q7DcKJbs`z5R9BzM+eg*JXV8>r(#r z0*U_@);r{B{@-6$%o@5ld0Gdns{IFkfPH>{Q8RoXPwOB$2S@eaHgs|F^c_ORTX*y2 zO$;B%)4GqpK9qb`=m#7BPez3Xzgynon#GLEH zbuWJ%PUrui9PDb5Pv7u^U0R2$5kEBfaq*F4{>0G1-~KwB;vw;zu>LVl&zdy!%F>S| zgSUEVeXwHk7{njHgwQyVA6{?V0=#v-s+|G!MVwg(@X1vsdDItIK9+A zR&)bTjgI-OOUc?ulQ$2&XdJXs-ADH|&y~?B;8@gD%*iX+59rVgP zFZ2uaYI59DG-WYXv-t9-Aj5HCAv_5v*C9li78yW6;PT3T;(;~rZM z`mOlkXqT^ZZ0z}vuv6o7!788kmS5nnwN~H2&O3 zUd8Z%eR@yV{Ji8f4PD^>CE?*n$d??!k)em3{(Tb@lMlIiuOD$;U_?6;FNoTyIS)a} z(fCc{D(D5dnm^Kh|Dxfys87~Qkx+8$h7R^go}lFFJxt@Pwd4*AzlFV=r_w$l$(^Q3Qk_#xx7XYfHhB!(u9_SYue zgm}dT^wbY@YTvz)TaR38JzV7l(}#s|fp(lZJlc+WOKu*#KsuF!Y{;z;Km7gbb}s!e z|5p1C&pGW=&PMAtI;Uky`puqmnyxrMtaZ+*)@@|RX4h@jI={3|dGHbZUi%;CcdgqL zncpGw{XQmsy>*+Q%&Pt~{cJaX>7N7UuM_0YardX@4tIXB@)4(n^ISgkU$jHcZ>rzX zIbcne2i>B*F@1Z_0UH=TkU#ilRKDi5^!>NwCtnoCH{_?8zP;yw6$~FdpZ#@P{~R!X zeRZRAz?$UWHFDtB`5Nbd4Gmr3k1aEk4(wbiGo3ynV*k>Ze#{#DqCQO;?Yd05GV!+l zQJ47Hen;zrdX75^_dnuLU+KmV{TTW1zkd#!e@>Er4%nW*dtE!2 z#PG%Yz2>>~oy1}P`~LqO-+I!EoqgeVRJkLa{jzf-y-K79-J(74oQ1mZ<~$MTq4Nc_ zKJuKM-*MF^p1UQ3^6-!P*Zu~2XdEc0`Tw!xQXid(+#gPTArdExws-*7`&IwUwQEwc#XI|p`WY>4&__gWhEcujJ4*VAV)f(p~)C?Wk zODCF63{4vGkf59~@qsR@erOL>HC@%={Ng*&4Bb9eqTd7HakvR>-(C_%R)ac`rll1oHnCAMbcTn z!tV{@Z|^uQ@e|kY`{OkK+$o(aHI9*wIOy@*DO54qr}{O2oR&K(v=ek%-_v-i!t>ke zN4oJN_#uw-r$_G}-|YGGEhBHyE(dNsUwZocqBNcxn{v=o`)sryNBwl^gQ1>_eu?{J zH2*GpTK^N$#o4pjbLcBahyH^-xeKE9Xuf&QbK+%B*DE*o%K7J|%f5*z2m4me6X&_( zvaj-z_3cZ4D9m5fJIfEe^UDjzg!X~1cZ!S85uxny&)Khi*3q>HrN2FAeil` z`OaqG@Q90`ZLNBr>3z=S&!`9JP>=rk_=%TC^{=s9i%{~ih7NqXzi{7ms9hI-6!ll` zG$+4AC_XjACr8{+A<<`=>Z}`AZUD6Ldc@skyCvQf-PCp;|6ZZM%=VyHfv*vt_V5Yf za~{4$KNdZFk@$*-AG2N5J$z!Ti<6dz?~%Ui;hV${JbdrNj?dV`7l@yE_z~N4^0=rU zD&(K>@M+@n9)8IFv*h7t?02djK1=$Bhwp#D>EHJ7MdEuNzEA!`4?ldr<1_K_W#Z=^ zUiS{9{x|9e-8+!=@Va-P;Nct8r|jYL#MeB$?j2})_!Q|o9$xnj^gX=p9T<6d-8(S# z@KZe(UlFxe_YR~zyzU*yd3fDBQ1tM+cc9|ob?-pk!|UFGmWS8916>cVdj|#{UiS`+ zJ$#S$&OE&C9Z0@1>W3=nGag>|4&*(2rsd+Tdd{I=)er9l&7ZjO%)k3yP$&P5 z-V1czPnYyhdFq+d^}f4rUhl@^W77X&kE7@7eRnTAHv3*MxQ5SZLVb6ie|6|rycbkn z7=15DGQUD-{knJ`BYwU20{DIWd3Ueozw7rImB` z2YLRv&27U6@)Q?ZrU&_@jNqW_$$wJ@(ru)feifMhs54deOvc+R(+mL@0kKhMCY28Bo zsMeor)B|*j{*UR6?osWVa*(h4K-QA4`8<7RBKb4J2l7*Ibbhh(`)DWr`Ga}VLGM83 zs`wg_Z^_WX4?3q*^7VYF89KC&wn;-Toj*A6@VaMpWbml>sY#>W3$nAZcD={h(L2V) zu|K~$^3E9>alRuT!yo$Oe(C0i;IBwL@cSFhi?vuDbg;X_^zB^-9~wT8U%MhIf30=! z)SH}tBtOIS?Og{i8a|LeyD}!gST;7BYqmm5A9xT^b2IX=nc1A_kf*Vd$H3uSns6#%v*1t-38J+KEb*R z`RLwQ**#;w2RhVy@Ne-G^zV!H@7L{la{ToV-LE?`bk@I3v+e^w&PbPjTeKZCiO(6l zZJ$-<7fn9w(Kt&mLAr{ei)){X+lHY-`|O%D^i8PVJ$#GtJu!Ib>yLxyCLexLe_B}% z`&r1z{?Mg!Cq?}-_<_S04c^9GhxrwgZ{_5<&VWjXoF>;x+EMyMhWMVrTmL7RKQ#Gq z{;xBCV(8-hzp_5o4DE&gvnCCFbF{DI;Ri$Kmx{qdU;jO$Zt|h8-Y*1etj84fZ5ev# zt@jMAd+0r*XXv2!#H0hgmnM8JCf^>~2YiM2w1=N?9Fa5lfN!E`(Eq^l6GcI;ZU z`+xC$C+ADFuCIQ1mybPT_m#H7LW}PV>TVn^`ZoE0_mL;PQNEH4=;6N)shns41BT4cyu=;phx{NOmPe&1-_5=cbto5n5QhV% z{r90d@l!*OdP}@BtatdU$ow?%)*i^f5B1Rg59b$47yMwC@PfnZ!tp5THN8*N|GJkmdvbjH_w7^r zZ(Seqg?)9FPZ;}PM@RTTzeW3Gx*sENVMOpB+GpY0=Pu%+&wIPnuU5XZSM0gk8IOKO z{y%)y)kpdLD*RC0CF+OFdz}4ses?PWK_~k?slMaoAezE&WQ6I^cv&Y^yf_9K29`c}%o>78R z$}JkY#dCn)H%gx3qHO2_{#zO*ZS5KV$;C@Ik{^DLs`DRyd*;qZz5B`+J_!23uPf(2 zuw0y9?f0lU|KXtbwko@Cchx<_NAm-j_d37C@rm=tTyj|s{A@hvoQQ}1?Wl);?evp> zCVBdfthJ6jtGCXH*!Hrsmb1B=!tY?Wj=!YpS2&fX6Vo^+9nOX#@K!JF2OXLGIK8wVbZY2g^X<^vanu^r}*?vcW?yeOI1ge%0hdUY_T|mkCvmwqFY5Z55sBr$atN!!Mv)8k=;S z-3{i?3?1~)J$90>ek$?7sNGqUw)R!oUP_Vtr6ql*zAqFHey?3>?R)TDyO-f_^i$e5 z-C()3){FEk5*+-^#eMSc4t6}b+Q*>t-7h+E`qoRoFkN)lkgNHxIm^ZMYqpFeqAn1a6Ty-8r;=^IRFXF@d9(E;83|*YOrq1DK`L*QL3?Inz=LsdR zZRq0U6*;dtZ%6G*di#ARh7aWFyoLV9T{+21wnIN49&|pB=F8rF{#&2b+~J}}!7jvu z=F3Vfx7m5Znvny2{P{BJWBUd4JAIa$ec!#e(!VS7({1KY41a6Kvrr)T-M^VnJ@n3> zY2a_zp?S3QN1XkewIfe@$0wMd_>}W!olti8&mYmD9PDaHuHk3<`3muUlOGokbJ{&J zbnvhL{89bS3?2IU^hd+`hhACoD;T`hOXqNuOn#hRI)|fb=;HKJJ7^j@=+!gnMI11m z#|Cfp(m5PclOLy-&f!RWEVMgLFP+1YF?7(YXwuNDNWE$X54{T9M>Jx8)iC*xw=(~x z@5(t&SQY;)H%x{4;yE}m{Nn6vGkopA>{N0bH6BCn0J1+6PWJY|T%c>vfR`|cmz2B|%{ea2~W*XW1# zHe}lFUxXbqLkBzROea6(?6vyHj<~qk>^T7i@&zyWW15f78%%F>-vd@-NY8 zu3t6fAivJ^?ftHxWB4rWpGM`c^3!!IlA^=qt~R-^O@t(!Is-uhqbrfrjN<*c=CI*QV- zteZ{^-uhqbrioKSKg9XJ$MR`I7w3PC+wz7E{;!xc{H%4;ria(MY1`nTZ;Jb9<^P_^ zhhMaAUHWL)jvyz`{bAE6ePVba={^_QZT;V6e%j3lZIdBBd1r>!#9a<8$9$)Ju5oi>6v`!t9u^=i)^n$#(k0c z4^27fUtquHe?KrabkINZ`OrUs{!4v6Pl_HsPkhO@j~QB|0XJ@l~JW zls@r+&8vQk^(k+iPUod5Zf&_m{T=1%OY5N8S24+k@f8;jTJN;{f_hqYu3Yg8q2C}+ z^Qv0+lzufshxlkIZPo>W&k)~Ne&7Z8Yh=>!*NlFe5^wdC<1i1T@7~_a!1?ImH$648 z^svQw?Kc0@%>VAK-#zU6+kO9|;9>JmVg7r@iML*K^yObgKGq{Er#t&~ud(86%df^~ zY3&TO_$}5iNiVtv(+_;|uJ_lwv!izO8IQgvc^B^eA+?2&KEPZVy{BVB`uta2eOo`l zkEt&@{o7xU=36@Gt@&oXN9bOxuYc)@gC*~tE6^8z=Gt?W{6+tcli&V9|6VN6Yu-`w zaBY@**r_jjy*m|0Ryx1T-s|{l9e7Ck@&30QyEPTk;xF*meNpYpT)8>v4>|CAAKf;% zXKEvR^&Q2V&b`Yey7x&^;77fW$nNr&!ge9LK*p+mtbCmFd;4?;wXdsb$}irxd7hBI zyT~%XM`-m&JJfgZYWJ$Qy7?Y4i0`e{4?2HH-*5h_dDt=+vx9cGBs^?@{)%bA${Ehi zruW_I@N&nuME*6>fe-Z4IY8FH3c;N@T-sb*H2+nG*-y9zAV1eg$&fetGr4xyNn}cP}-<2+M=_c>hn_lhG|pij4$hwCV7}~N^SKUApGW-j9c;hA!PF5Bj$iCxn%{e6k8$bju?}`>4t8Jd zV5aWisNrDy&CEa1!Q@*V%)Q6K(ia@8vfh(Dmu{Tt;QT8NcG+)@&T{Gg*$x)Zb#Qu~ zgPkiJEMMth_ty@#xPPbmJD2WVCV3#tSq~DEpK&jmUOUtM+b}BJ2<|(gOz(am`yua-`T;! zy&P=q;^1Ug2Xh(XcXKegyMx^aI5^HS|Dg^x9_L{G@ytKK!P0>aPM+#u?NA42FLbbV zn1ji~9jqSVVE@GqPG90+sp??Ld%ztpJDk*`~bNWA)_i$4FYOP>1`q>!Kas*`gN2OoF%@nL7AKD6`Glwae# z>^+(P+v@L^GneeUI5!^S!Ni48eWVAG2H8IUsSvqnlrQGt+kgDvgWiz4%l?uxB)_RAC&%+}#Yb|UNj`;_eY5!KBTv1%@+D^%=HIfzhaU2% z*PnSD@`LBgHj<-s!PtT4h@OjrwXZqB_;2yPa%nU^RR4;T zz-KEz8?XBv=+N)n{@2f_+-Lj6ehuW0C}&SLq{p!6Y8-S_4xB2Z~D}ZUpe~%4*gXleyupD+|GVW?NlFW-copR{|!%{y%ze}dftbD`QKabb+3=?f89@A zesIs9C(p0vG4-7js-Dx|2-^+hNRMMEXY%|H{NRJ{&Ry;6u`l!QaLNVmI{F3EUm_p% zEICNW)pI8zZ*@KQOg`$l!gNEB{ldu5p`Jwtxv1wE^V4UC_5q(KK5Ou(=YmP2p1br@ znfUm6UfwQ!oO^zap5ruL=Qso?l`yYN&S-}DI@b9S{{VLku zv`9B4RQq!BSMOs`yRpv=_^EJ?^P63FT+CZt;@)!(Uc-ymJj(8bADI~o}}$e%~kiOe@c z`_cYVcN8$bt_^%o-jEw%MuXI0JUmfPp38katYW}Ll`PjAON@u|;>5GHVpEk~G z#JAtz+AZWkf0Y-^l26<4v2iZHDbD+b4skw-rW46;h5Ep+Y38Sim;Hj!3-#sCa}GGq zbJyngce1pi*L+`zd`16*cbxh-*#=tt7V+TCTQ*p3T;1UY^_7k~8V~+_r)U6SpXS|t zeJov^-zSux{C4Os#82;A(fH|+E=M}+3-sSJkAAK1ds-Zy%TG-s7wxmlw0+K^eU1zr z>@71rCA9j;X4p}=o&8pu?fwc@-b>0$XWY>F6yJA)_i5_?Cko7e^G(Sg|8O_%C)tuH zUEus!BV6g1zUQ9*&<*{P=#YlpEzv8Yf`@uI{ z&3#^55=EA;5=x)en?nDf-bDw#sP`u6dxXHlF9VZ?U*`13nE1GQ5A4`d;l4Qexz=v# zlYH2@HT6BGkJe2-|D``2E?VU0n6GuhKVJ6d2dE!IzMgj_(p`4&RTrq=it9gXr2FEf z?|XmTdewmUyhw)@>ErInvht<>O@H1o@Rs}Gd7*w#{mhK~CY-+qWx!`k^8DyI-FMyh zK^Kw@^0(%{@BAb?Z~d=tyjgYz@>V^+q=W8la&nfJOP-uM`63_s>bX1OeKBR`cRV_c zFUx$NkYDp$j{rZ!(^Tcnz4pKlh))f}cmzJ%aL?tehfk5dVDN~`vPmN@2lQ`^c=-YP z=!dwd|HSR*EuY}tmqyQZa*uq>lkTth3h9G;;=FmqF8OcNzV|uIaryARr|j_HU4Qu; zq=NcfO8&svy*q_G_{1GbSMB-6hakC#8|Lf2V9A^Jqy2W4bSMY^6`8IXJp9x!Y4~YO z{oBOHwO{yY{1)dQjVJYfam-`pPw;(f>Gj>}i2NV;%S*o==hxod9sda9V1yq~uulIKSC(m9%O?GXJ}jd6FU&p6K}Pg#E5&rWGA z#vjO^Ql8e8Zg}>AFMPgG^MU0`gupM_ze&UH zKIPYmU#ox9IkI{V=)LZL?{)I$Z5=}n;!)?wioQqwjUT=&y}JDe#zQ)PBGkmJ;^XWFoyOs#kGb~P<2)Jo>IXWtztqRqr_=K^N4mIq zbnw$Sxwa8Mj-y-a&>=oKeHrXnaKAR~9uQ6mQNSbvcG2dLl5mM()!Bmoop9|4()ZsbnUgFe}OL& zKlkZrZ|Y~EJ)kcWpY`x5;tL*r%6KaqeBj@N?5Z%oX7W*AvRANa@?rOw`y^$r=A*iX zF6g(m3{4vP4=-}|&kP>@b>ioto#+?pq)QVoJy0+DK@aV#8okHy)p#I%Md)YHWm_(- zb6xemX3x1?wCifLUC(Zb@|loN;=K;9^Bg-y|G>_beMyNc!}73yK)Pv^K2cYC9QpzE zlzWvsKS|G@w8^(}O7p0kEYqbZePZ%gM^`m?$nnonZkYVQ_pAEF9P`_T4t}n4y+qG- z)lc8hAuc8+4ZoCVfAaFse&C0{a{8tX9{T$GF>@v#dieLRslGQl*H!0HsGmTrAujxL zU0a?!?f2>MJPXBP-=ov{B4wUKA-!xI!rzK_L7gKZef)Drv%d)awy^($&Tm;l#c9#d zA%3(^ta@uSeyXHvMd=d>rn?3o7pDW04}FHzL;DY9w>@vw>XY@(L)N`SnO}x>B0lDn zlQ;OdcrKZI_*c(&!7=$%4P9J3tDc*N4)NSGY3Ma(y^lS7mH4T_LtlUYaN<{?opJgW z$tP{-ps)51tNp28&Ko-DTQTWC-=!woS<}N0$1X0~29N%_XVU1e6PG!9fEH`IMg>0dklT>sbp@fzF0X8fR!KmS)G{p${U-)(X8hI)Ug zdv-XE?tj#y)<^_3A2{{yTk2At(dYSzGK?02;P>Rj*|+|DVDSC!wb6M4 z#f9SD@?FF&=c$h69-NnL`+*<+>``y|E(9aLMY$)k;M?AO_lLe@e*BHf*Zjc&%zwbM zx9y!Vy3c!E{_=9g(?@zBA936x|B>wDeB6v_$&ns!rJVZnAO5Q&?soZolrKFFWd7L) zyf6EUr_~nuXn&Fe`ha9r`>X#ZY+rcZ`}bxxO+NI_GhHT>pSy+*?N4-&i*`0-{>;z; zpHlj_p&n>|X_H1AROBb(*J^*7x6`_t#v`w9ob+kB2r4apcHU0(Rr3GF$+zC9XJkkp z%-ebAZnjAuckU+qrFjFr=SrUu&*=nj_+d^y{=8l0ccEY4hau_m#QQdZAD%avi~ha# zaA+AE5{doaS3l&b|5$nv{ziM~P~NX8@CncV><0?JeflD0p9AMGzk1oDf4%2}8@ssj z%gY5%AHO{e$bUkp=TYLS(0;4OZz$(AKfB~{yI=97#d(`n4?Q<8{rkPD{p0U(D)c~m zkQ}4~7OUDrGa_$wduW?{)NhgLDxum#-_W5whz@d5-(%%p9oh$chWM1hqdjCz8gWpg zp9;jsw})VT@`uqlkYDA0x)Ew6;6Hswd?FtvZ$IQU2VMLAN1m;G^*7pw@xs4<=Ll zc1dLSep$`Q3BT+4KJ)K!-o87&p|Sn$$PfIrjpQI5kgSUD>NTN%&O5*Gg$F%W`HJu3IC1^S!v9^^I^;z+As_x|QlBoN-sjThybCMm zNXj|*xUao!r^|N#o-gMWl=GFXr`_<(ojQjjAN43XNXOM8I><$RHJINubifbEuW#_E$B{{+9?PVg5+7fW%iHO>t$V2SoV+x5zX#en zgkJW!E&9xL&L5}0;A_8+dv5oi5FK}xNT0vn^-ER;{MmntyT4QTocT@#{?z=v=6|Jc zk9_675!3emF8D9~2Pb##(f6oN>iV#L;n%E5!>+*yB1D@W}S8`H+aQ^Z4o#lx4A>f!=2QBVKaA+HdLP}`z?aCU?BS=ZpPIoVzM3Yzc+QfpLwsDjh2EM+%bo1vS?yqSbNIXmoz9g`aK2jo z=0@{>nMmBM?&q?94E+N+ns?Q_xca%Gp$q)8+`RRj~ zp?^T+@9MQ=EEfF$(Ey~4%iKFojBAD^(zzYhM&_DDjXmHGV}oxc>{BwqmN6a3TP z3s@vQ5~yFz=W0G);UUh;#koaVtrXP*mkek`(_ ze@=Gp;nDS~>`h_(z`h~NRe0XDf{)H?u71?{ZN+}WC(i!lM;yKGIYfJj^LN|u zfjpgenEzN*-oVhs$s2IptjuzfH@-A_pJMXn(0<6%J&1EpUe2Q%GhgSaci-*w8xlfZ zoL=dVJG$g29h6=*Pp^(APv>{%c+a5xJ~VW3@=By%wf^YIOWhLngU)%^eTI^kH*~>s zYOCmA2cA=9<~Ix-@Kfs9^6+)yyB@wo{J_IcSnp#GUn73z;j_di{~Fo{eI{%_84q70 zKJVcZ#FspLpZ!eL!`Fy!c=!bIZ4Wf&l*=n>aC z@4nBt({p>H_3O%K9KTiZ{Je_y1bMZBPt$TDjPcy-D(52T#Q(-S^OM>W$rk`|6a3TP3s@&T5{MU_=i2(5vs2@eax&a^gK>gC4s6{a%m<$u z%a=}beDu7Udh&A2A9{3lybOL_<@0=9@teFnY){b3ALkC2qk2_XKKc2meT{!c`S|0` zd6Z#((a-_kBmc68FA!hz@M+?k9=^Q2>nA!MzRUXQd-y!@BM+Y>^Tek;e248L=i$r57d`xx{Z7ThkJxY5J$#4sEe~HNzU$$0#1A}tlK8QQAF!XF z89c_x3D$d_`5nS6^-L~@{z1G9NIxOmY`-vK`&<>D-Z;7L$!oD(k5J>}jz?Genv35W zq4cujbQ7FZ3*o~JWMGkYw$sTwrYG@F!_sqmi)Vf(#MWZ(T;a&K55M^1SHleySwfL&oI8 z4ldgSlZK_kO+H*V~=p zcsjvx5uRJndd`OT|-*?3amw)~(zM8fiM^KIpKN-Jk^M7{%wiQPlE9hc;IKR zN9(+kXoaC{9Z=M?c|Z_tAsb>6Mc zbC~jf{@CDs0CD8L#|*eGEjrrQrgL7>w{6J>JNKEl_qF-` z4h}Q*PW$O3f9$wGe&A_+UgyGuH|F}I^k^SWdQ7E9ocFg0FMWi;%P|$6`#z>~Z8{ev zyuwT7dC-G>-TVJ0+lJ-WxiZ8t4c6>-*6i;>ixBhXOprx9Wz{(ix`QJ&)(U2PT&b+ab;8 z^qnj5%UXC*^~pVd=f-`_dLDY|`_eh`6Q7oa2Yb8n#vcvz2A%2kUamun&e)<8WgmT~ zI)7$B5B%Kstf@DJ?Nj1>f5+ihbnvFvd5Qme-?NI8Cu7ww$mPCg^&NiN7ohzEvctr} zL%S|K)E~4T$u}GQvP=bU@wvPMuM%Ez;0eO34!lP{G#q%5@U{aVv!3)Ec#rU*18)*O zao`2Q6UztwgT5KU(++&Z_A%?gyMz}Uc!Th=11}R^bKp6`n-<*j$1)u&9~Gx*KG(PK z5clqVlbx(-Gp`=U3ee+s~?8ar+l4@UEAhe)aisb~}_KZp8Lx^hxa27Nnie=S$%xSn@*bc*1g{>`&Qdd-un~t1*SF~ zpBVYao%_dS&nW(Od%EwkhRSEZzwvda9)10($k}oEb#E#YzgI7M>4FOnIg0z%y!lGX zGh`}$_WP5~XFu{;_LAkdUH|40=Qo1+kF&^U_0fTee{PfA89dScx#s|-56b=cPcr_Q zN{$lqhEC9KA3!;Ne&BbOdusBjKd4;s{|(Bq+Dms`a?l;`{R+zc__ydGFa1&O`DDg> z&sg}Y1pb6R?t4VSD);LJpX)P~K2sK+UoS-8=U`9$U{~*-|5KV>HLxe@UER4~D#7v+Q#}VF(5FWDT|pa2HcP ze}32DCq5`gTx9sX-m7#^OrCHbDo}Ld|E%2Xh7ww<@`KCWR_~v3|8|j@RzV17jOJ41>J$}bc zFTMJLn}07lb@Ba%@zY#%Hp7G7@2unj=M;YY#k24?>iskw=A|dfy_lGBZ_|W)mBv>$ z`YW##&!c_NeKv}(B=J!W{|!j5PdyZu1q%=DgYfVi+JOqon-(76ZPIHy@DkxY2c9B) z=)gPl_r!sh2~VsM_#N#`+RCF|4p}d=gwNK_s9)B3dG*Vu{@~>&qx$8_CgFa$Li(y- zva{^e<@fH~etF=?+hTsq)TRSk_<8<}HP$x##m~Oq1?9!v!{u|`myur6*fGZxd=M9@ zH4Pp07kUpbS$Lk^7u2o1=l^9UDKie~IPePLJqr%M4XwOCp5k`_Cxl1Y0qu0$`TmjS z8D$syIeXl&CEv4J$1d9K@Sh&>g0X8bZrF+MS*7t2=Y06o7e}&3F=gyjWvcnlL_K)V zwfSsCKAm4YbH-odZ@u5;vkUqB`j@>|ZeD(B`a3(~1AI@18U0m!tsw4Ezuk4mq*V?- z_9*X&sq8dm;h}yD4}4LN3oNf%cz`!ar*6UF$Cj0cA2Y=35z?yvWD!SI($W0C^s~ReY}46*bXuSLQ2f6)ej$&n7bo*XM|sJIJp870TBWkx zi2Nr^fsgoi@576~Bk;2y|HPkOkD$G$EIdE{ExLaEv%G5I`SDM@x&to|-m>7R7hNll zI2w`vfbi&g;mzYY_k*Y%o-Iyv56Bm2u+MGw+d~gHqp^~)Q_#L`&hqU1%l>gd>2sIL zj$MbJ_@Eqi%&ueXT4XADs?3XziCA?x%9S7j41vJMO*glzBTpa)v4Q z&dL8dTt8endgM29Bg6;gu;WmAq>Vi^Zfo`Xa9O5o=03v^YQYC1L>)>72-E@-l}7jL+%puHKwxTz`}$7g$Fr&|Fb-` ze%Sw6!ZQ{ee$H8W__4E;ho8C{reG0N?=JR1Z?I&>eCu9x@_LoH2Tlcm?F7%J?eE-x2LA?0# zkZ<4F-%xPywBNwp-;mok82|cq;Qj#ZZ;%~^&VC8)Cvf*K*z4rbPw!w#weIiUN9)dm zCEpd+Q~MG$4wBuo4xaWUXq*#0&YwB%u5i6y@u2+%)8mfcn)7;XhoANfXdi_5Rp<}U zi?TzB`%Fe$uLmCdJ#|HRA4lrljva{a?t{o#cv1XPd~U9N1$B!K;z9cg-2D(82T%J7 zV&oIGuK@J4&hPG1u=fK*$*+A8?tKAn+~hY5+pEoats3_`C~hhap3d=WK233N?mSK>Vdm9v9(1pHk6G8;Miao$JsYT{RL@N~{y^Jc=c=jWs3s!^WG zHKZ*|UG^~|+vEfcnD z{9L1N`W%yrU)#cq;-_=fbG2_1iw^YDdG@BmFST)4E}d7`xqh`b`E$eVxXz=esfXqb za@PH`QS$5l@VVNhjw6@OqmRf>_8MAvh-Y^nQ;z4!;TPCJ=gi%6{pt4vc8HQ&=ejej zck;8lKdEfd0Y9Bb*ZF_R-LUYY`03n!kLSt7&yB00MF;$JZr!~nAil}c_0xIvx!Q-k zMF;$JZr!~npkm=g>8JDRbJhEi^rJ9yLQoq66~^>ygzsq?8Bo|9L7 zZCUj?O8(mG97mMi7nWb=okz|&{RD{lK&~i$ zI`=$Rz0O&5z)$Cvb?#gI$`)P}zX9W+%=5Ri)$5K$2mDgPr+vh4=-}yGug-rf?i;rR z{VV9Td2ZJ|cRjN9{Q^(taYhm$gOj^ah`V+zm|m; z#ZTuk-E*RDy%<|`z)$CUyAHqP=1bRaq;tG;^mj#z4*2ODu+BM4znX=I`3m8|-@D$;F2i|6TH*(-vwS!xP^-U6;x9C(iKu>+409{)ht4t0(XQx3dD_>=?B5}tS9eU7I~4!lTs)qzhD z-f-Xv!rKnK$@i9?1FsN1bl`EqCl0*J_rSyl!**y8o_64A!m|!MMtH%25BOeQcHkw# zYYu$E`HZFm?-Sl};5EYg4!lVC$bpYF5A~t2zCFT|4!lWt#(`G|&pGe};Y9~N;{0C4 zfp-b7TX3&mh;~gK@Y`XC2b{&5h6Pa{lMPd7tRSvqt}=&6nA9 zv@V+4w6MdD$6o%R=;TR9^I#fR+w*QV9j%L=aMipwefgtr`U&WG_May@%1ck=JsZxL zNA5^|rah*>$M{0$S!Mr$RSr8gnAd!o{1)FT6c-DH2fFAV(=5+hcz~Blujs(jgjXE+ zkbbONaKvHD$|DZT#Oo3sy}sb>b9L4OG`~Mr96s!yK#0Ze{o={{UUzT9zkeD2N`Khc zLF>%b{w)OP>p0Te}-^VGfZQ7wa(+<-iQ!s^H8y`3FiEfwt#!LkVKH|W> zUmSMMY-jW@GM(-F&aF;(KStp$Gry*KX!G&w5%(({&HYNp{Qcig9=qxT{%zqX?~&i% zAei^dRsZp&1K#|bZSXhh#fasdu4(sVf45&2otN>T_gnXtXE(XJdFc)K8}(ImkcYk1 zE-RJX`CL$s&_3sH4X>XSt#ZhhVZL^okx%xhS$L?o!UKQQ&lb!379QYn=7$y>{+d{M z_^Uy?B(^v5M%7!y#n9c?mbuyQZ|3sXS^Un?_WS+kvQvJ#}D z(6OF_J*T+7U0cuiO@4rU`bFte6uw0dc=EAQ>8(`r+%3*`g9q#|d3Pr?9?O0-Y=<=Q zwVxr+c&S);{~!Jp?vI#_f7hZ5KWN{D_AQA2#KD^)UF}OS8>-*T)sn#p5N~9-Uz)1if>})KtAwQd#_aWK>GpY zhuWRt`cSawfS>k-=zUS`Ox3~Dz7M^hNv`GwL3@aL)8lg^2i_!nY|#aNhWYp|fqsB@ zXqS`&&k{c6z>|dM9e8YgBVWmZHyCGC2cAqD{DuWby_esTe6DSkNBN`Adfc<{U~k<6 zAp5EP9a(r@f3YBu5A1>dW6H{-ok@~@j&Q}hQurU^z2TosKdF6gy1(qGRnPpPjVt`F zgI^{6>MuW=RIC9PKeXfZWy0gNHu3Y^A7}G`+-iT58yY+7z1UDR{{v6^*@|=Esl9D2 z1<#XVM*EQXn6d8^(;`zy;PYoYp4w>Xa;hCI&4JhEezf*d@S^1GP_7}<_^v@*_~ZF2 z!{d4R_s~<8-@vv#^a8%_UDEioNP15`wDQ|r|3i1D#x9^6CAZpL?VE7>r}nSH z?b6873w+&nUwS1!9_WvH>3%PJWc5Q!ldH!5Pwh1HK)>nARkip*F1KHhTx|<4O0G=q z_1UXIx!nHLl`Hv)zz&eB;q)7lD`(-MT`e(hf0rKey7%VQt><7z#fH)e^=(;rkfXxy zr-;Ao)wA%>zKyLsbyz8X)zg~9_}_`gQ{HdDYoyja)DL+>Q> z1E$gMv0nRoznLfP_e{GjKR@%9kH6yD%J0AXVf;kF=+Ql8<)>8_ArpSEYi-MLf1D+L z^8Kd$v3bDn>c8|JAbEyc1nm{#%WY?~^b-8rmpm3-PvU42J{FI`{n{nYs$;#})8 z`cC6(43hB!Pi1$yyyJf#&8s)_#|}O9H}D(kMR^}%AFW?Z_Y;Hz5B-h!cq`Zb?|{?J zd+p(WerGLYym~WFbdZN#rN7cih~CU~mH4NE`VYAV#4rBX)En6$ZQ*%*7YYx2(Qf5f zUbgT6Z%a=L?mZuCSb5ZwEb-ceNB3*qIm%&pK2LU&eWf?#^80Jfr=PPnAhFo7$<-hF z$3-9f1pY>O^3z8DE!fHROP|>2>zh6JYn5w#?IaSuVZF{CYwoxFuTTzqP4W2xQ^`}h zB;4N%56{6a72-FU0uH;htvu{9qCI+q&uSOv{tw-!F_&G=&w+C+_RalYykdpR|Mf5Y z4ZCED#xA=7;QdxvwjaOmFU3FLZ|I$8x%R<}pL_p_=99n=HSQC{*P@40TqdpX@1i|uRlOfUsL z>aXTugqO0)A@`7SYrp-p{uUnUiSR%delN4UVc`MZA-$FZFB9Ii;E0ofl}DV!h&LuY zI!=P~h`L8h^?S=5-t;l)3R&^<@-y0#{0_l*3H?v=iEw>Pf5zCez|^J*IW_JmA8-0Y z^}B|n`5$0F zUF-Z_l)rL3x8<%Mx&CS&6!uq~&$;K;1`b}2c_z|TFm zmOeNvx6aAA=hpHTUKBr_Pt zF~x&@A3fx9??=l1H;4nsrSoPwN2Yiwd^T(^oi}sOknyLQl0Yy5c1()wCF%yjdPSH ziLY~0lH08>Ba06FrgL#R?KbJdrEMF;$JzRo@GR<-aj4sJ5vx*%wO z0nZTLbMU*=Yv{l$gijoJg7Cy)fu25J#zoqJR|wBK@C@Mv2OcN9?7)Ytr!@y&CcNpu zV}y4cc!%v--+|`{A35-p+P}lY`cBwCBprB-@Qed55}tG5Q-l{Cc!KbX10Qi5QFq{7 z!dni!L3r1JmkA#@@EqY|2R`8VD}F@S4sF6y4!lPAlmkx^o_F9ajweeFJpV=0PgNaw zmG}(@ULd^fz%zvR9C)1Yp#vZCy`u#QW#}l-8_rv=iz1X1t*GNb|)l3(tH1UC;~XV`D3i_s5Ff|Bf_ziXYkg z3FeCvSDAGWy$@@>V6(*=p65OT{PB;%_*106=?5R(UTv~?;QhF@Bs~5p5x>dzXq$(x zKi_lo{w8_S9}SOpW?SbdTX<;K#^g8GI!E%TARauKX7n>!=g3%ikhkKj!)l!)Z{fjT z6)O+9da{EBx8o;9J=#_|xs;3xx+c5T6Z}cP%`?hm@~x!Qsb|m4_e8(&IQIZ}fVAH?Q^k@cg~b z0kwW*-oKg4nM!nL;7nmA;@5B;CJ4&NpI?RPGJ z2hJbZa(jQzd0uE-FmW{7d7;=&PX9@MspE}(ZGNy*k?^_B2Nj6%CCmH`-*^Pkbox8RSr2 zCqLbvyUj~?pL4}_f4oKIT6ez3JRW=Y*@K^W=OzcFO!@rzLq{ITfpYk{P5OPNng<*+ zZ|DSaY)Qp`{*KSwy~bC*>YqOI_2BsVUOeFaeh`0gg~Hn>Yv6Cs|MSELd5^@5_OkM& zz}{#t-TAbdRSvnQm@hDuom&% zaTJaN^+U419Y4OGho&7phXpG<`q~8#&g*Usxo!LI#`1T4_$S}pr1GDRDW5;TILCd? z4a(bLDnAb_{cJhTC7(UNv+5sm+uw7QE5{xzug}jMwd9zq{e6${v-kktLz&^{Vl}WY z{Oo=YwQQBc&nf1!N{=(`LEXZGpM?j$@MoLl0}BuE3H2RWaQHcPQXm)nTq0hQ@Mu2= z?UUA>)joCSjXZAQAKHiU>f!z&Px?`D0eOpiN4HOHN8T#)J*IR|NC5aZbF>-vJV<#IsNFUX!-(C5In_QYUJ#S}$|9k1gZ*H;Ul09BQ26oi@ZQh}4 zu+9HbaZ)BeFkrX1a}RckYu%SjQDfcom%%9`+zU#Xn%qFLD?hm zc!l&@gnBi_nZ9(L*wuSU474`jg)cE~#4m6JSC@dN+pJ9hfW%5Oin z^I3oU^uGTAJ(R2ec!><(wfvFSUXwcFTc+G=R~&xggL2qsOnDQh7<;H)$uMu|1adsZ zN^#cvuG{kY`>*?x$|c9&C`Wbe#83ZN*v`K_9PNtu0N+EI(XMnt{ATtaJ*ymYSD0@w zl^sVG9@-V*fiL_SKb3ki6+F-9vKAbEE?9Z^xl4PM36E}9ym5px-jiKrf0_yGWAJ10 z(?+iCXy2oU&6f|^JTX1qlYPI=2d{bljJIv{%;RZ14|@zK&xEP?mA)ISufQI{!*j4l z@-)LY%M@_vowxGPyCr=IkJdYAPqp7i?dd!A>&!S0g!&M3_H{H#Kgv#!x6SdZJKl?( zZuEfskhf1dNy2S=0|!69z5JAEpS7<`arD&Rt~q*U`#*ota36y&ygccjxW~l{)P@@B zhJM$!iDb3t@di*$Tf}R{o&~{V_vLH{M1pV{To{LfStRKgvT>&md9(x zZnk}3KkbjwxntSKl|wdC+WfS!PlWmp)_gP!4_cywWP^bSyfEbDejT z{ip3^;d$}9Aoi6Y9uUuIEAQ(^{3*hvzf#DB_!z$s-p{Rl-BI6B1-`p4y-fOZ?MqjG z-6VeZvg=z>@#MY__lbY;g%@svc(Ub(p4t!R>H+=qgZ&kYO0_RNwZHL`_N8aO8rT(a z)juFS9*VKNz|@tePWW8=wB7IWDgL6`1+<@uw;8$KMy0;I(s$o_{_(&2I)01nV@IV*s?G($479QYL z(knagDZ*Eiu#^=NBmg@a%aiH^@aKSeo?+U84FUN!&fZBdT+5Fg|{lo{itQHbBn@zTU9_x;a&kE!gKJk#;N^_=g2 zmKQBN-~YrbTX6WfX651MG5y;lJlfCRe&uhO?>?w~RT|aKg09|6+~;5~{i5s^KP%AJ zACLbf9A5*cy(v;`*@+sB>yW09_esc4x zpWb`;%SX$Q6MVFO+~RYumru{)gSgiEc!B$hquOKGMdJ#k+MliUJjjK1wEtrG9Qo8Y z0=>Xb`>ypJ7|C69@TRyvnd7>h@Oq_S+yi=Af7Lz!;Ux|Z@S^1RVE%8$x~p?<-o%kh z>#o`luKN;FX9s$serK7t&vgUdC%uw`-y*!~z^jBe9C(88wgvaciIjg#KliNiC_4-o zr$Y-5c5NPO>Ywz}I4E{bpr_YfEl68=n}3b`^HzBj|19x}7G4y8jZ>=@9{9Jcyv;vF zx_zrWihq~w$DV}ky&W96ZDnfX3bR|m)jxr)wr z2sIATc*TAW?XkY|cM=O$+u~UJm z_>IpB=G#1d777o~`Faz-$rNzt-L~@3JI;KMY4kY3+t1*P&vfp$%=5pt-k=*h-^e{z zf1S7|JPy$M?QHhcJ((x6!~W0HyYHI)>0bW$-nOUi^Zes|dn~_q=?DIN80=Z2TrH+* z_sc&B>3R&5Zh+X$0+o zSN~_Mb7!q`$UUaK3BqNkqJ@Vz5FYp<4yr6~S$Kf=NUvkT5g&ak4?h-&HzGVbK7#Yi z{WDCx)q3?=KMvKC1yNdA)e@`dUqTd%x2gHN=GnbEig%t5F*^~}% zGwpKx!XWO^p4M***Z%?eXNYIp#E(b9M?W|8>~hHfySaKP9>4OQE8|giaQ8>F$!GO1 z{Q6I>9YEiW$06~TTrxWQe~HKHkxP%qrgJVo@oi(rEK}PKetY8Bwf#`gzM(zQ`$nDX z&x(^a>A{w0C;H5fPY9kzJ2A2F;Fl`%iSHP>qVH>+IZvnezPaY`W;`*gR z{HS{pAh*V+bG^?h29#=^&b?1zKz^_v;=7Uzw<9f;Uu5iL`wj9;5kA*EUF$dDdZT%T z+4@cG+d7#0ww5XV>aUA_+WHjawEMF!@WpY3ZJsQbV(0(Jl+T~vbNGo5$`Map$~~0) z`mX53L45}w$#Dqf*mjLgMuoka|1f-l@zAl9V~bZezIV_2H@*zzUfj(SALKpT&FEKa zA$~LGXBt*HWY zrg_6$#k3QztajvA)V4w<{Cv9HzvMn=FwFn3o1RtLq8xqF2PWb-?fAVSJf?R1qTOjd z7>>&v?`Hu$*jw*oYIkJs^d(_C=9stVNnppag$I2nl%q!Y>uq-us~UcDwL5xW>5~3G zw)yg^QT>P8?u?25qut)IJK7A}PLNyePV({_{rg?j{=!cB!B1*$l&akso@C-c>jU}k z2KIyB#(Rg`ofOL}OlQbL_|n^*`HKoWn0qLzx0?P}?|pyT>FAvlOOoG?NB245AcdZi zN9ok1VST#WhV_ZFyvS6~fgbo)32%Ja*vT#j4u0szwNFm>u4~=&@9DG8b@hQ=r#27E zF(4nchc+L-Jvhbich^m)E(`R7ym999Ol>+wT2mj}y>R`C-(%#7;_tWXY!9|N!BF{J zV*f*y9Q5Pq`S1?;Y5nFu-+kuQ{#uzAfsOh)V7d0sYuq~KydUtuM|8A)^TYJrr!Kr` z<1Iud^*y7n_QQ)#cwb3CN9#9#Jm{WdzP#FD&x%fobhN)+^NwSyow4Ov3lDm~ubj5( z%O_lO(8c&0dbLSM=l;ihZ^^D~`~^Il&e{NYzu&*{(p!I-TYLI_azZ*f&)+?=W-6bPx}@f zc#ZIi1J4p(ci&}gXTH5W2e^r-WxWFJ$uS|@C)Kr^HVFZ{Dfyt z-#K&lZtp_5-#$>D2~+WFYy9WoAr1zXKF~Y)Lt}?5Q_zDy@>U*txA$BtygUe&yTOOOncuWe71Tubn3h8Hd}mY-dFp^_F6E0_5AZzp0WRY7dmpc z{mSe8ZQ+NLus8gaxzgA(&vZJztouX|U*dBX=_Hmve6Ka$v(CDpW5=;BpE_cj`XeZj;a66&)YBoRWe!yp0Kfm(i@8@sOxyV27VcYjL4i-PPYya!d zoOj-7&c6emt?-LmE>+Cj6r2!^XtF^2}H6$6$%!>ElCgz5mQLkEr(^rF#EqTw&_% z^!v}%L43i_+5N-gmlVq@Ol^7mxOV2t5+?=z@!L&~clF+?_qCzL7x5Zv8#(On8NqL9 z!eIbke?FHbe71I{`$9Ng=Q=-DA-$!qyUdJ-O2WuJ*ZZ*M_xt2C+x))!J{-Ho(9iw4 zwi52;dm&LAMA~I=JuU>egb9{s`O28+Lkni#yic z%U|cT+tIJk5trR~@Tu>A$D#gv7V2lrxtCOYpa<-dz0TOJ$W-lYm3iQSkL1{fa%_Cq z=l}HNY2Wd`E@jJc2IVM@O7Hp3y+^zq&wKWoCqBq~C^P!Y_>YYoD2Lqcd90*W4!L`j zZ^Tq~oU-uXPvLUYGD_KL_jldcV_r&*JZ&{{&40 zk^CR}0nIxKe?s~nj6b^xO)hl5UZz$E*UR+v#(tf)iD#P!?4|ib#lPf9Toc5X?^|7!Y>ntBJwe1SKr*1IzSbF<9e^F^M_a|Oq=*#Zu z4LUmV0ulTl?C!3wR>*!-}qH`90j{fudh0ML=!3eBwdtheYHgTz=L1P&bVfZ<#nd6 zUpj;@eSOv2=jF^ZXx>ZhvP~E5YW!|9U%UYX^L~xVH$U~*7ru2g{`TAN8;xCb@1)i{ z-20A2=iPYF`&EB){F0CCbX^{QgHDZfbT6geo80+I(eYn|yk~F!OZl4G1}FUybkJ^h z9sQ&i%E6~kKDyUZ`%K5;@6!qN-WU&hzpq@e+QAE7`HX*R8FZ$8YV_8x;y#TS)-p69TX!k`IML5%FCY0Py3P2XDz!T{{4Z0SEe*` zld)r#X`X43X_;x2Dfqz8xwV{j%PNOG63pvfPsRDb!bAToJkUk|Ghun^XGSi;N3?Io zfj0@yIq(AEMF*ZByyC!Hv{T)I7YT1!aEuGOR^A^M5N|+u^tiw~*WjEh)qB3`iCh1* z?t2&=cG-F-zBcdbW&H1y+vBba*eKq(;NE4fecQaFU^n=w=kOCBl*3Qin~j}|Ocl3P z<_(=-{rL#WQGV;A``>m$s;Y9$cV0+2KK+I3f3wcjIsdx@h-2{qKH^Y%DvjR~_#1M& z_m?ECa=*S&z7bQ|amvC&eDy3n{P7>ls}`O={v%%9g2T@(EARW6cwNG0^Ko zcy!?h^@B>~kGlAIc<_h&eez-uor|nsI@Q3iA7wkS_d7>NmAMhOEDGLsN zOj&vOV?saV37^d$UB@4a7u5&p4Y^RSnopa4_b)71Ve|byvi@@`Zl!X?``s+xwDj*Y z?*Gzvrq{_jlxM(H{u&-?=!%Z`yhu9x-0;R@fA#B)iz*kNdsu$*-#X*NmVf04l*6Cm zgS>|_qh1wn3+x(IugX?A{Fq`s%T#u%TX^uJ@W2=TYO{P`;Q>CO{v!(xKgNC@$OS*v zh?gWh+K=A*#C4`$?(b&eUhjQNHazKLiebovAI6bc;tMZN`di()?W0lS)Rco?CH`vr zzWg(Hoa)CP*DH1YRdN{#%>VF05XyXdj~FnBqE{?x)i^6A(tc#GLOa)X5*^;H&c`I;SYUT?-F!Fl0VG2;>30M0os; zARYiO|IE~rlmjmojsK@CxF_fIdEMSk=DEC84!so{N_AehWa0Vk*hywwBR%xqT(j`J z_+8Kr=VJpakGPnkUL(TgFQu>_;#21VUhntNG*2M>)Sbp|vwaV(Y#0kOXE$e^a1OHs>&nSnV3%@XSt1wmjoIf|v6Ld8G+M9gFUwg}zuWY-M-@V#= z4kn*{hX-!^u_rHo5_~*+%o88vJ>6%t&#}9LxQ}X|6IMCo?o!?%Q?<_-3(w=bPt3`~H5(3J=G9Z@?a@p0Qt+spc~;hzc#{;;sg9BKlaGq(3^SB(7-B(+%@J~Ol7Bug$F+h4|L(LP~Q@AtfIwL@#m-Dm6(?1$Ko^(1-3jv{=e2|awb34Ru<~()RDu>)<=Icyl$DxG>KMN0h;pf;rM$a@;!E=0W%7Vks zc`FY;cjRBfqx=l{w4SK*sG5(NSo0si)A?7O`_w#>eIEhrrSXkY59a@LZq@z1kb4in zIHbqSagF$4RKJXJZ+}a{H*WIAfAN>LE(o!@h40Hhu-n~!g?23 zo+3OdZlQO|xqnXeYBs&K-{T+}p?8h)3?4V*OX=OR z;bvlb+D9G4!Op%)15{x*&%D; z!5_i{U-+ZQ@|uO`*B8=jSaA5MZRHW41>*GxkMa}b8(z%ue$%AW>rQtE^%QtbmUo$| zKMc=r%$yg>zhd-;UZ7LF#PF#y)%Ymi5A5pcIbY}9N0uDWzf8PF7(bR~zHPzr-r;^1 zxM!6^p44}ZJXxi@PtcxMx8>>059|VYn#`x~56K^kF`u>IkjMQ_aKS1^yy^W%>5%f4 zEj-9w;r;oFC;72%;dybfpkw7BZ;bSY4!qkldW|hOj`pR-eto8j zi_T*P4!=k0^*vKwIwHVBeTomvIuxs?_ud%hSH8^P*O@9_>ki(C<#F1dST#S z=-1@)U8aiH*aLxFh!1^lt^S7KdDuHeyj&PRHlVyk3mz4(6{{Tbl)q2?nMyA^USUUf zem1)}kPCD&JQtj2D!m34KU=Q}@!(JBH6dQ=!H^wdZNjH4IP`MkK5vyr#YdfVN){gE zcH>_0P_yt5_iZZ=dE2!2z=3B8A6an7+kcapXHeY7ejDfsIa;zCQ~6=8xF7xS^~HVB z;a6;#=c-H<_caG^#PT@#NG?0>VUIqaD}6s`pQGY$;?S>LZsce%6@5GY;7`?GrL`-} zbBLd)_$)jWw(k`23rrQC6$=mXsqgDeoO;(FUN?*%%P>E%;8F28w#uQ8+GC{&md76s z%k9Re{Fb)x5TAJ~4}Y|1=ZXWLBD`k7A#d{o;rMJ?<%rMtmB!v_rt;HV@frV-d2X(D zIW`FE-6Nk7Q^jZ6!K;yei>c(Y<1;Eg@>d1%1N~ymrH`%ph;URwNRv!A~C~wDs4;U9c z3l4dEZw<%K&?<)<{kF09n5q03`)#-%sa<36T1=z-3H`l){!eN3+Q6St{w_Td*cb9- ziC<(Yf7dKL_*>tn8(4C}J}u()!}zf*^CJr$TL8TnI8rMKMPcY4(w;^-Ljs8-c{y%4t$FFp#_KDZa+P-${~l^Kcz{QCmsvi$884{ zPZrbuS>=$I(}mOL#Zv6=lWbQztREA`f7f~* zao3&YyJABN4|=2?5A^r+Sf%y7{VbYe${mXJKB77j_8?P_u23t*Kg2p`K&`eD_;4D!aeDmZ#U)h z=MNpdq>toil7H8cW5~StXkKO?@;N8<+3goy^u`(U)9bOkbmHw(yPw`W6VH2onI}HV zOMm1Mr>aj%OHUd*RG0z}?TP!n*P2xhyQZ1XF_m507M>^1Lg9ff>Rq4Z6AKUU81wOA z;1|Fvv`@-{BmSnWJmN1-ygcDi^AL!?*suS8^JH3=e};jX+hM1Z>4$it+K4Ux*S6$?z592C?OkR0fT^Ct!{9q1e6I5s+83(( z1#~~nZ1)Se_tWHmZ|wT;t4FWtuIFPt);)hwCH@0P-*+3@dRuPq?-}jC&e@dKHtlEP zNt4cYU((P$FHC+zrZzv=DfP6Ge`)t60Z;SwsmDzJrG1UQv-ltIv~Qr@GkDrZ>Edaf zKTCS!J%jOqa6wP=YIWji+#(#Lz|%dFZQ^NO-^PP|xm-8BUom-iL*?`@Twy zH?*%Z%ktzO!+MCX(u`H^w>uoKh_C8%-oo?RlLh5)KGv}E@K5(CW9Js(;%EEEujjvT z>iPYz?;OubCmBk&{XUl3;nn%m`xz5|GWu>thUY%=rcIAseCo--w)_1%Dag++>;HD| zV-_zl<=(uMBaho3XGlNKRPAz^dGV1Pn^TUhFMM&cX1o14m1`aGF3R!5pMLw=`v=e5 zhOB4bdE$e-M`A{MISKKbInN(|Ch)uOSK<$ts^3jpcz%Ck(M6o)SYEd90I!RV1xG*A zu=0q5A^qPbJi4Fp)@Pk{f7w;`rx{_682qSp+JjiZ-~H4X8$W*9ug+1q?0XIe*zMn4 zdE3WxYpjEE*dsYI_L*WTe(mE;+yW2w5FYZ-yFmOZQ{u(yRvvnfsBeq#+4Sz+6psHq zzjr#D-pwtI+}h87U2mcEXynO$&ylUYA-XOiY z1J4lNvf!vET`TX`6UNDa@aTA%zo`GT@uT`X)#KT|-_a(%@Dk4%JIwa|j=F=NC4SWR zJJ5a?2I2TE6MwevY&2Ou*LNtiuTA3#&F@^g-I_m`_9>j={V?v*zBb`c$mf0MKKdWM zvlwi%U#ziGxF1eGZ|qY1qp`2e1NCaQeQh1$gEr!zMmjUjzYz{R_`AS-kEzWMIQYT7 zP3N3z@ZAP}>YKj9u$Cba`{(nYeg5M9PB$Y9Ju-hWdg^?>VeZI-k4m z)#Sn>=6z3eDx{plGEdyiT8+HzN&0y?PwqNBXzL*CPE#(U?G ze8)_IhxSU}XP>sm3r>9}zV1Pi9n%(`U*9dd@Mn(YWed-*@5HM*@I2uS3y%8Uw({_Q zjCei5qwBkO57f`X^-KNKZ2s3d=jSegWn!^sk68KZ@7yZS@9r(LOy)&nm-o?75BzZ3 zmD4wDcP(%cKk7Gc2f+KCwbH>aU${^4_xKy}ljrkgrjn<+QZSzkI|>ia!CrOZcbEbW zyY#HQZx`l=OlPx;yWc``%w`wut2lsq|Elr5>yJM8SJUUab7Nzdyt6-}c4`pM&`WsI ztHkH(Or=-T%0sUt^BtzM>D6-j-SX=k59pj*X1}c;J^$J>4}=`>SL!9Bm+p%aJ$v7k z-B0VB+asg&1MBTyFMbHG+2W+)v?A#!ynn*I=P>nhpuZniq%%dhO$W5_!+0ZmOSr$8>)w+x z=`DTU&D+Q2oCBFFUe%ASv!RjgmdjSXqWO`G{8I3uFF6t|s&PE`jVgw(t<|!UJE#b>g4YhpFHdK9{rLi1(tE zNBs0??+W3w#rxFrCVn+ftTbxA7~^*L`*Cg3pX)uOUCOmm+?2O5aO z2JyR00Y|*`tvvKjGe2S)9dF)xl5_8|>ceb$Yu;#c?(bjz?Ux<8%`z)3h8(uu+i`#Y z-T(gL%Rk}=j|MLGbdY74spSvz7K3kB_D(76)z2qEopN-9Dd-5s&>!D>n^Up)3 z+oznPm-LYw9r7PIa!i;99{5O(4^obYN1Lts+g&#Qw#qf$-;r{B;>u7hdZu6kau@H~GlsD$&erj>{Pa?f(UmT-ov zVZ{IaaS-1VbS_u#2^*|9yd~;AVf4Z9d%}qHRo`qrh_~#YjU4WKLT;X|w>MA0e37Y5 zM?%}}-dy7(J+HK3@k6^8bM9Hx_^%tmAAE;|&(-dYZwT$?H2sOMcP551SpSu66pMCRgJFiN8=Vkdk@*c{J_PA%2N43WTs~mE*nAiK6>@czL&>jm9 zeBqDe0;5lsso+&Um$%^XQ_0H1PYL2x36J*E{6(E3O?#vItntjXt%vSYT>x+VBJHtx z5LfWKd+&LN{6|b}nvhfXnU#+>>tK3cG91nSz*E05yxic)zcwD^QyZjoY9Zr-De&R9 z($?X2slR{F&%$rRGmKrdZXmm~Ejqx9pF{h7!=$QjgVO@L0B>@hDIc91#%sQ0@{-Fv z2Uq`nP!2lP^G&`;dXg)*tkDy6fHxvulBw`U-w4a4eceq5uW)u4uXcgq8*i9Y^m-0n z?pvmOKs?!_af^XVzT|}_-y&W4v${C!hXL_Qq^tT5FZoK&cdZiN zF?bUPFTQ-3UXOSk(iOepf5UocpLB-!!fQJ83OpY;a_|y~FkhWN>s(~`h+fsgL;H}6 z8-Mp4c#7~cQ`j5$lSKx<=D_=eHywD3@Qwqo65e;<1;R%TJVSWw4MBWDo;cx22R>vR zXB>Ek@SFp$6JB)SCBiEXJVkijf#*sl?ph8!MR?bNPYyEp0|#CseC)uBgvZ|)w!?(& zNy>pIh(G1PM+X|dc?aGlyyUg&jn;v-8c6T1JlYd{F7kBf-2l&WKKjghf zW{ls`%NxC?m;w*uH+P;cXO%;r5%q`@F1wX2JdgiE;ejstr8>(y79QYT((5_!0^vgo z?$M1+tUThcM?WSKMxW^MxEI&X_q*~(+~mLSD=uhOi0j$G+Xr!o@z1GW^g*#(6BllJ z;gat?uks4{aoRL?;Ptj~Y(0gp< zp?8k?_zFwcJLP;oTI0sq^lsc@V(Yy=%kTKvnuG2B`~LMIC;VNaJT;~ocgMaOuIJ*jFX^mt)JpI9z~r$s z=-7NVVEM)IA071d&D#F_s}~3J#0U7E3ue4WC*ET0V(87B*GyUEkh@QL$4q6Xtc8a- z6&~oqUqzPJEIhzlq|>nAh~KuAhaacJkMP;*ZT5dWccb{s9KK!keaGxwHTDShH{Hni z{dRwk@2<7~{kxzX_Q#U8d1`d;1w* zdj0FDpsW7heGYQy7Zoq*m4bNj=NW$Q^#7DIPdu8P{p4SvCb!;fVv550#k z7`z(c(o42RigBFwv1%vYJ(^liDi&xPYi2fj&>K%%XZJIXH09noN{65Lpd9sjM0w*$qo3+^nt4NKnPnu$ zZz;!4$2_u2wX*UrRIc%!&h_oI#qEp#bitD=q1?0AJn=!^6Lm)W+z#=Zx!`}}pYv88e(um-CBmcIDeu0dd;WiZR{wWA z`?oKibKjB2Z1RgK$Y=X`8^C^f%ytk`MGD| z!Oy}2U-)^%^2FN${Q%Dpp0eQZ^OTi`pPRH(p72@y?Cjqv{>{u6%l@pE5X<v=xV*8a%p(nA{?ZsC+fqL>ia1zOHO|t!uftmh2?#wcD#ZA^g2e>@Sh%kTLOT; zo>Q7$Be0ie#|6?Oc0yop_(k_z)_E>d^D*V{^RXK9_IfkspR&stx$-P;ThBp$t+%`1 z#j(Wq>Vs>uX0*Oj-!SuXpaXriUZ3QC0qI)|KOd_wpDhRW zg1)hY(RYgFP3t*d56*wgrLWEnFHK+HeqS*B-R~B;c42c53H{$da;1!2(o9hZI|@&! z&ijrkhF^;N-GOh%Pt~FWd+NNh>b30Iw(wAod(3BYK|ANi&$}5vEFW9XMakKtzdO_~ zzET$ln`U{Hso>xPc{+qIeV^z2MeP?%|08*ozTW+{iM5TKbJ<p>@Jy+LT=GlS|fdwL%!x;!sF%96XrdvO*}mZeDLiPzO?si&`m!U zrmJ!9Y~wTS3*B>BaPrQHC6}Ce)A*9#;ct5!e(FL%VzDP~x+J#v(Tcx680|-49b>l& zQ}K&&9S6@~oFY8r(Y`f^-(^a?Sl`M+?=_*`Zf{U89$KzAa;|cSA4XNv|@WYcQ2wEh`VbQp|Um&Zbx2`L4R&2WHbt?=xqx zk{*%&<<H9k%lH21p-*i7YQAmCz4ek`hT}(kP!7AK*E4p>F_oQ5%o{qv zd)3#;=bouUPuSm~R0O{7`SJ z&itn2ll}d`H0Zt`b+6EEEO^Ha$9L}DK09Oo`gd5q$7#1`UfH?fe=ZL5a7~Aw_<#lM zl~~`{FT+&wthpS;WG5|*bn`uo9~{rK7$;}nY4p!C z1s?3?u8S3|a_AFdKE+gat66x6GvR?Q;;F^*zJ&+)fOZ)=@G{{O3y%0pY+%Q|H$Ta^ zOA|g@J5%}}`;CvY->4mT`U4v*Zp>I8I+6XxKeu@NOUW00_%G-SJJl&qo2lB7{IS7! z7j_b!?9?azgel>F^UDl*2AH%G+WpyYwvmY&lLRpAX-C#>(qG(D3bR zx33>#`IcY(+LlX}x%Ow^6|Hi}onSu0RCcUdc<`t2 zz!&k|WO>iR1AIh%2NoQD9$R^|uLa`8H#G7_``J5R#(mYgpG5nr4_W@0HS}%_nean< zTv5mX{JYNnUfDB>Km4tIw?~s; zZ}GNY-t60hl|j#r2aR_&Tla7KA74BBKvV9`n>+l(2j%c@Y9nLcEK|j0k$FQWkmK`| zpPwo9+G9y@zf< z`ma9v{^Rs+3LWsn`?mW&9N*aJ{gaFTn?ut~H~ILmH=FC}dr0-3t9$6i|1@zv+dXuh zJ;L>7iu_7UZGNy*i}0o0Lx=j1aOMFOe~MF^F5+GL_|DFIrc-i*~=@ zO1&Ij=L$x zCoaGL-W@i)nex; z3y4r%@cq9~II8 zKg3O)`R3<>=lyy7WsUz8=bi9#3uFhEuhxC^oi*_tho6tdH#hp&`(wa2&-EDb%@7ar zdb-be5AKt0&ccKKlZ8fp@mD`pvhck6v7jE#$2wLX{?3tpkMODGe?EQw5;EZjep-*y zI+X6cv+pm0{EBU*@~6H}tNU3&7w@@DS$}=I!-A zz{ixg>EP%7#c`wqj}hK?;1$vtIq;b5@qs{Y@SS?a&`(-$zyGuHh`%`Ta)c{hU?2Vb z@sqQ^O7}yl9@)>qFKU;Rs$8l3P@{dp3-RdQSJ@89YqdLE|JD6kBL~loAIbZA>q~=j zDSjlMTVDzv4D9aLQzu@;w`SqNKP~3nc*zjncktuPj~saOKgQ3o4+V1g@kn^mfyW5X zIBbUDY$d*L$GmC)%Vxb;~Mu za*9ppK7IGSZb!|&Ws(1GI@Yg39t={^^pWU=zVTSW>%Pf=5 z8o4*8(q}Kb>wZ7H?i#L-c=NjsKk)%N;ycIZW4u>a@{|Pk@F0iyY(YN1cy!@zANa|B z{!qeP#Px)6 z6#uZ%Cwjc?-7E7yo&z|7hCB0(_iU73^SSelor3qn%~`(Rvb+9ht0*+#cL-Li)gmzvW-0$&Uo} z6#jMZH%VLNkb6LS6Q()`khAdMU*Ul-{8(an-NFOBO*%~r4nKCRJp7m?UZ3#U{OGP* z={;HXRC+@$)I+Ts-OPejPP=udw|wC@DE7-`U)?Wr`=5(HKj((sA2j9OeEl5jWK&xk z`xcmLzM;ar_(+ahDaUUAz4o*>>~;TG<&xtl0Qv{M@B{L#DE0#=?W2g$KUyXP)I13lH!H>C`MZ{M@wi@N=Aa9m1ph4EZ$f z)ObIteFUDqJE8Hp@W$NNBYUy>coLW&%^cHrr0xA%QSD%M+rYlyt9@KKj(5}!mMuK^ zNqxQ20r!h3)%b6=@s>M2?^yI9hrScxj?X6+9{iKs&d6_nCj#&~@v=$61l){ z(5v@r^Bz8B!4ao9D~~v>E;Mo#30J%@eEbCClaceidDZ{f+9U0^**aFlV7kbCHH+IM{1sr;3 ztvvK@kZytSsQL-Lv(9~DYCmSvTkBKW2XNw&mH)crt#L0!9;9Z+;^YNjl=Fwa|d<6anKk7YQsos0)i%mPA_nxVb2KGihsO}zq?}@X# z$kdgmLHN@48G^2R53}M~ac|Q_TxWPsy6*9e?|k-cXYP3Kbx;v;mfFe4?cUQFTiNIb zJj9vskViaa`CN%9@nRJ#4?B;kS6%oK`oYhZ5PItad^`U3+gIpu#-R~4{nCU-zh};0)Nt-gSX!L>^@r;a?sKq@euyjiNon1Z4}Q)&>ncT-cbMuq z&;;KB;Y(XrLH}BFz6+iCUEpVw7o6{^#vTjGA-C2PlxB7@cFi+2@_73{IS(v9sUI#| zcwSsBXjpmAf6L?Vg8AiRG|;{?fh-iDV> z`$qWCTXd8b&IwSSk>eF>A`vc@Z52%{);i8v*B)~&E;O?UW3n6DEBigekM~EyahiT4=tsaWey)+T zPdeh)u=qvkS0n!#@1>hfzoA73{Ceb9p#8-!zI$MYD1KGW%az#f%*HQo(E-0KpG(sZ z;#YC-bU$H}cxtD{RyzfIy6wq1GkYxEPE!rz z&p7WDl%3r6s$$WBopcYP?q?LgriB;fmmc|~toi``%1-+@vgm-H?o)K{aZD7JuHS_E zHRg!Bf<*`XbT6ZOA7s_R)4h!DeUPnlmfp@Lc~9b8^?mH{)BTR_y^_g213N%|-S6n$ zD>=600-o-7)V-4OW0m(VA|8OJ`yF+!r10{*cM*6|{vNP=u6j6d<>zzm{gko2!g}hS zNZn7VdYC^qY=2KS|EDz747dMoJuN$Yrtg`g-&9ZQ79Qd_=X~$7=A1WflCOLJ<-np7 zWyc|(YhDtT+pVXmy~Fk?65qW?GiTvN@hgAV@R_Tg)-5`SlN6tG@8j%Pcv1X{d@gfo zSU-1M8T({dzcHVy@V-#RW!k}Oi!SXrjdxkVFG{ZA_e}X*^|ayeE0b>5;n#KWM#QVq zPZ|$(8bSQRu1(63rM{AX?BJEZZ{$r-U*Q!m2GDt?YL6~G2RK`9+#y&_*vP=|{bx;`zqoPsC|2}iR-}j#T{LcN2 zpHK7oyzlpSp7Y#iJI^`y+;i_e*L6M|s_U;I5q)JGmqT2sFR}CN{tdxjMSIgf-Oq}a9MP8s ze^=?NS$r=4vX>eErp>qemK@O+#c>t1BmIjMX7?|8xzRVRzh*5tqOS{mQM4oVl@wnU z^1I+;e{Gx-%;U%v#*RALX|X)eCGMiPjdC9GC12)BbG-1m;@U<1wEmjf#gCWhtKzsM z0|ElgE^e@{o_6?Psh9$>kcMjKUv8#OlT>Wck$q~DI(APx#8K>B;zJD%# zUFezCzw(xxNt}2b+K2io7N1LBDf5>r9bLFA0+xZkW)llIUW~w^W!OU^t`C~NKj4<{*EAr<8{-LBl>dJ z!fwQs@yuIxx#C&5&K#G4z2c16rQ;dj-M3rx#eQy%Dm9|3K**TYN5kHN-d9Hhxo|K5u3AP;ml(i+PLjplI>A z^mT7GdZzWOmL*60>p@=$_A;J*i%;%bkWc)O`vYUtC%*36FZ3$tDMgQio>lZF;#g4h z0_bH$A0dxxirxjispu8ZJBpqLy|3so&_{~iK);Xf8T2;=dP31V7%$U`UIsm<=uyy% ziax;kuA=B|(Cdm`1HGl_3DCQW-okl)py(OU$BN#=yeC!+#-RXuQqkj}XB2&e`Dk9z zyP%g8Jr8)hThRxY@AnkF1o}|Xv%EgoE9h?@*H3XpFM^&@^f9g{vx?pV zy`bn>(94RR0KKN@EnKfR6}<|2N6`zQ_Z2-2`bg2cSoes2BN&GU=m|wnfu2_M4%U%! zik<_#sOVA9D~jI1dR$%6>!7z3JqdbO(c4(x94LAT^s%C6L67Ynj6)ym&PhdYfu2$H z4Cr}9A7g#Kr06}+tBPI#y`ku7(A$b01HGr{UEJ3gDtd+YJN60s8wWkE=p)=eN-261 z^sJ&+KrbkI9`v%Jr$DbMdKC1gq7QK2u%qa0(EAqMn}5uBZfa!J%X!!PH~A5x`}%Q_ z^C_R3;(3(!Ym*kA+^@|B%aM{*miw<&*jE9a`k;OSa=*0K3EnTI-mvEw_}=a#c=+SK zx83yMcRum8r$wOseAG+00rkgak6rrkJ)hf1>czhy?1_HU_)UHG{S=WyJ&!@p-VeWY zQRm)|UZC~-9eU#HKK0Hup1tKbQ}4}lm0$FScI2SHr0l4nOg*&Y3D~jwnkOy$NaXe_ zSkLD|Uxpo9?6`2#?>%td9#ZeM(>&^7nf^=JYm*uG>*D*FxFmtX=b9gYEmy&|BbZD|!<2o<;ZMMut{d@~_Q&EE#{?&o6oRHPt?`y#8T( z*?B8@!RN6LMtl72>N`LAiOui&xrvkieAtGlzwBGR!*;yl;k%?>;#7n^RUq}XtaU?) z6ZzygiANLsJ)qFV?}1eoztbp>fnk0R)c3p7@i(?#>C0z}=1642eeP>jPB?l?`CH;r z_?C$?->W@q=RI~l`Yr2!Nb1G!3hEa>hYNif?293M;y3xEEPgj|To(wwNZ%@p-zk(w zz%aj)Z}NG}ui<&j(r^CrpFMu|&52+3c(XSge`u6^ZlBjSxL52Hzw`T>xRilxZ+ksf z{3f3qCw|w#-vJ6;+Pi0!#qT7_LtvQS3AKL*?Fh?rJ_mU$I>3duZ@xuk-@Eq`J8Zu< zMg3;?ynf_eCtfmnj9L87ecSk50#cv-T{iKXd?Hu;u7SS|6uS7`waVgm0_6cP%zG(3Yy$N|`i!SY0v&zzraqu-M$MIaC%oA$r zy(`+s_##YVme&sccgxvMcYkJ;>$}@OaHFaB_6Jw;C`alg90<~QT3+llYJ+=zN_0dljFqiG58Z@KOW+D$|{TBRq$m&5A%C)PjH;cA8MZa z4f8wsdDG9<5QDtmRi|A3&fg#Mo`>ac>8}yB?*-*Zz4+aNJ$!Da_Z2g4^(^}(e$+Gh z;E;FhbDLcM)a}`RMdXN{#1uX8gH3$+ybSfEK{s-IJ!=WU`)%;y=hr&v)sOyN{uVu% zDS9f9$LD0IrxBuOZ4vDKntL2_%ZKadJS2Zhf1@0hX+O)1o0R8y<0htQUQ3%_^bq53 z9GC=3t@zPdGWa}q+Nzg!8NyyZ$HP1*T71$!$tQ9pAFHTuS$sn8Kwd}D^Pu+?eT4QO zS#-(k=%Id|OI}yNmjKR-Eb!Gjmv^NvX@CjB3F z^?=lu!+io_lss#pUdobBBb4KZ`}rXGk+jN_`~Y7Dba#Gu_y6AHe0m$qr&qss)o0hq zuKZ82&-Qy4%%^X?ar^VfXFqn9)QjIu*wY2lZ~HkU@tb^docKKif9yL!zY|tj{4Rqp z4SJa0l|Kc?`@+d@Y+s@s-X#`AB5Qp4!qZ>;!J@LmC^;U4?fb3AgCgWF z`tKVX59;7Q>#pnDZ)QBmt~C32&{z9*bfIqywEL~ZDP4JE<3VH)%n#;i*mw}%*~|wv zz&g$!_B*_`?2A92v0pE*$CB6o@hzPPkDbgjC;0)p20-c?p6@?zJIN2!Ge06n8h?^N zq04xXw#wpn4aem`cjt$9o!<-k-P_L0OTzq)z1R5t5mD^@3b9Y_{jbaVKa{`4uQu&C z!N}ozwDvwF(tjvtH964xz5DAgzi@2rB#bNGdqv7F+9SN8CvudD1D`jKA7RcD3DAYl z*7H#zc)z7q*eQd8@r)2`>Z z4*DF$x85&EO}$_guK}t~ECM_Qg_={8+5VD@#7G{fW(hzM0p9 zZL5CL{wP<0jAP&8o3y`Gp0q#8iDOjzgPyYJ(#~0{EbZJvyb7R)wR2a!55>4L{`6bo zBmIl-Kkte8!A_C?ZgTG1o|$~tQtBDsML1F3@P*4)z4`v{|4NRRcywXU5J-LY^HdTK z^2u=$kLdT%?m(f7-x;ece%B#454y{5&!-vd>hzQQjEQ{7%i_Py_hngM3+S73)%R26r@}{buo@TH5&Q9e? za~_`d9(M0|Tn8R!;<@L>nX@s}S^mv@54!;V?0wahV0-O&bsnf{NjGPcf#+dclhQO^AA4qNwLrN`yu$f(xShdcj&+N zI8f@v?*{DY0I9EbOYr)Kd~%%lJph07grMJXt1Nz(C>QiFzY~8B&TnZ)nBO(5^K)PI zOAfef|6eY*(d2%D_*I8K{T-QPBIp}qfP zdr=~n&jsk?#6JGKrkpXqDZvimkv!_CeWx?1uLF?|6Op2~4f<^Fw~JhT|DE%quy*47 z@*xanH$3s|a(}t|@@+-2ouAJ$e|J3o51+g#^J!DRV1eF$oO+~Q+BtKQiGKmeys4mU zwq4Xx7=qq`WrL8 z)4uFApMR&FJ7MuCe$R~WQZIRvQr}Y=Lw~Yn;%3VfJGmc4}oQ$F6$Cy7TAWxd})`BXn{B1b=eUOUx4pNpIUzk>+&U644q#s$7dA@yR9eojAins2Y@DV}Kj)cYOeEIyHw{ATdI0lnV=_bK3h z2aI#wlH;;Bb+R94S33-><0tVu$?)s_5F$VD{SrMGR=ttR{0cZuKbNkbgU?!WL?8D{ z$fDhtXC=kQeGa%^XcKYm0>uiKUEEJ0bxJS}`n~6Y(#QQ0xXwkpqNmRu2kwVa#(VQ( zmn&~`mYhi(U?10~sIRQ}xF13a@n#-O+s7d{_Wc)q+%F-5{Gh&}rOy>lzE3voJ+IUm zew;*Kc^jC&S- zv7Plip>~FEkHmrd9PmCd^%c(aL?-x^F&*F2%DR+uL zub#BunZ^&^uce%L-M3r#xE})dRp9y7-mg{oxQ{^+apn6<-KT@`;{F3e@KIhF=XJ(G z?Er$c)5fcsB}d}f zhd#X@LfhhV=}Xs*Ur}p60ardm&IA9R1{DZ99zg5JMjZ1K7D@x6ZT-xa1W zb6zlB+?PS`-%wP1+?PS`-%!GS0Mw_iLu%1rKjpp*dVhz$rO)Lb?`PleG*)Djju50_i6okp!9LS1-&mr^a4K) zVn6p=(EBoUFZbt5!pHp<^u7$;rGxFweG>G(4C!TjK9`?-|9@IP>?-@YpF)!H#e3Kz zi%;@YU!UuJ8Msfv5OO#VNM9I?R~7H!>-`kQpiADk{Ns5}?{A>{PgCjR{ssx;0ng7p zi_fKx@BL5fKk*+2{fprJdA*-PM)7sP$Ndy&SNXiz+qsAL<)_UbTS_1IOW?i>)YrH8 zTyfz0{nPqS;wQm4aNh;)&p>@y#mD^;nrMIKjs1M0^dIhrp!Zc6ThB2HUk3XaBoJTf z?OOXGxcub)1=IRZ^rt~TW7t<>@u7u6U+zGWshw`u@4jcX>>Me5 z1;tl|+#=eY?Kf?|mFhu$yhUIB7E?~39hrAMOP|=S=TGh1f^vG0(}W!6W&GlxfB9R@ zaRtPc@k}4*%X7sub%&|%Pl;z$>5FyDadGAw&R;EyPxN{JCO_g3#|hEZ560H<6306D zhe}WU65oH(!}VZdAIBAL_x*R}Nx_mM`ih8u6Y*dis}`S2Umfu;DSi4p*|X$`z6AKo zXlLphTYN5k8MNE9ewVq_kCW&dLElK}D_VSVzmR;=PI6zciu#ttC-gYV9Yt@#{=TB8 zK_4l45A7bk%(qwM7eG%adK&b!qL0wOa*Eyry{PCF&?|}_1HG>34UA7MMNfg=RrDdo z{ehx4Kp!i58T8oY!8qhVPb&HV=k<)Dw?WS`lQPG=NXQ(K81@yY2=Rt2N`Vi|t zT}AJJK2Y===wn5Xf*xxH<50)?SW?k*pl1|43VL4A>sV(jDS8g{s-h=BZzy^j>$Yu0 z&w}1l^ghQEk#-R>+QqgmuXB0gNdS1~ZpqCWAe~QspRrD6< z4Mnel-nQu8{3 zv&!=PO}1wE3!qaU)K5U33yzeHKE9WcEt_?KEw^qT!MP-l5&KCa#+EYArSx!|@XB*a z!`}v&HdrOBs~)cXf&upTuVbJ1U@uJwMyN zDd-3F^7%PCuJZgFzhks6Djv(u+kBOi2FpoY#LvExM>$e2?LUM)xj&n@^7jCSN`YKeWhO7nR=w`vCL@aeA|zwtZ!=G zYrXIbD_?{ViAj^6jBho?pN0IjPk-b!j$uB(w_g74;Qf^{_zQnBVWq$r_pKo1Y=MMRK{w4nq@}9ZnxT|!2O8?|@pL|X*ev`3l48KIK z_`!Exh}<{3jQ5?&)_R?c3+X5Bxcs*tnj9-4A|=R`zeO*f6Xo-Q^s8a)>-e7O2 zKf(9QlQ$#pizs+GFOOM)Q>Gb zv7?Oh9Q89U@s97m7q5jGt1NcKAg5^2U3QhNdY4@dv`fw6bJ@jwYgv3^SKlg&U1hfO zZNB|NkANPt=q`JcR=vyK3i?;Z;&a){@uOhziM>^;EOzA~uVv9)c6F?Jmt8}Qmwk)R zWf#ZWvBf8LC2kMKs{?siMbCnsx9DOozgykJd8TC5i@n~z$&XmI>cvj(zsfvJ;(DxU z@rj*Xt8D9S;Cwo=>Royxclds~^zynmVeyIHOt2g&T4kAkG%>F!gHAu;_5|emHS%2W zx{vprcwV!QlX*PfAAANKId@3=`(JwOGc(@1e-#HVwd87BC3f0*EDFWH0qy*S@tgO{ zMuF#TeLc@Y&vqLxIC0yZFP!oI`M;s(kl+5~V?ST<9rueKFFx}Y>+#AS%gpwMe&P4p zZN~k%x>YZBXHhN!8K<_z=jmO7d?Hu+Q=j#B`t2C;7{LC0Bl*k+N<4 z>ObCi>B{R#N$MNWhiwfaOWm6K@D2wCfVEJ+!Tg<%+2LOYPPTCo zzw5B44divc{T`P1O+NbFr+?j`-!ZE!eiy-)1U<~}l-e(n*P&tKRWf7razDJQUw*KB z;_quqiGAW%4f^=r6XofBZ764w2;Q-u-r?bEzxuNeJxDoy$l>)0uX9HG+Ve1Pe?Hi= zt{mw7etO4U&+mNC>oNJ;i{CuTVVU+x*=w2^*E?vgNaokZ&m2(rWn3%XAMCdUt6uz1 zpv>zX`d_p7q+Q7;awVTzsP9{RLLVazLq%_a9=R)+2XU(`c~Agf3iPl%NZcJfZ!sUk z@__rieH#~K?_B??^Rv;a6d@Mlz zDJPV!;~EH$5&q^WCSRJ{n7pll|FEC$nd3XDu>5!<9)TbOrnJm>f1%NqsHTP++v zI^6Eh3nH1f7=6sUzGaWd=eiW%o2C4bk{`Rr_>n0E<>z8S`DyTp{Sq&ptBE7%&slt8 z#~9y#r+&_7OBSD(zYFWZa-?IGrM)YV-vix!Kf&9FMeS=cewXoY+P)^--!giy;Sby2 zQs-$J{GWV%t2?A01l!rq)5uFEo{WRUkw1wi`w)@&H{QUU-?^_z9s1;0$-CCugLzj( zeFv!R8H1j}d+%X!EPuh|A;;x5%0K$!iubY2X}`1&uNU|}K93`hpet`G_nCMn_V@Eo z{7O9-9A|UjYXWV*o~i=@qKZZ ze6cg%5BgQV$?xxzaRKYR`hD@HrBCeaqCB*|qbKwV?YH>7{xv`PTi;JtI~2g5u=vED z(vik*`or-wW${V>&0A&9&j`=|wW?XKsaW+c{goR{9BLMyOF#3hW$}srey|*g-0%A< z`PoC>#6Y+6N7`O~avn-PZtiz*KM7vXEdA3nAJ@kSe^l{jA%DH-vuo*oB6*!zHrQXw z;BU8P-v5w%X@A%3heX|(Trgj_zM|J>`rDwQYiWxPGPAORJV1X?L!_>GjLxw!S=9d`ecm$O&6t99#NaeyMfF8SOAodicIS z-vej-3cvH?H|d`!7uF8MZN@rg(>l)8UoxogSbXAdS*>Hz|AECP{U!SQpj~m)r!2a} zMX#@Bta_JSTwl#wd@j4#zGaI~>}ptLiB}Kp)V1g?yZTnW%Py|3jx0WxUChtegMNI( zuC!GayPB}8V9{N6m8^P~T}8;LT6`|M*gu;VpV-y2%3@ar^2Qe3Wmohe-#?dKT;EMt zd@j2<{$wmZv8!m6#jY{NqnbsZ*oEhL##@y2z_^d|bjcu*fPW!1a%^1PI@_(X3hSdP@KvYeNih)WZ6>Vw-8u;*8;_n7lj z*gTTQ69<+)IsY`&{$=IOjo;Bf802xHSo9`ApMAfr1xpSp=Df!1!|n&odH>w;d2e-{ z2V1KL&w~}{sU2bFfk8XG>j+#Yb6=tHQRetT(jP~qU3gu{>nhq|ud8^nL)SBS|CaYl zB@SM`%vjGzJ?!U;=;geK*IU$Eu=r-vTg1GS_aVddHZ6G*e|a4Vq~5;8H|c*U+w)qX zS3plZ;`<}?DClWLAE2Fbir(G9^rNCh_wqkdvC5K9EgWA5-EL>`S$>kIMKz!2{FB$a z_HnX~!hK^GVX@%gzn>O6?4h6BD)Q`gmh*9ee_-{J&+c{D3LBdG1q+5sAN5GR#5wY) ziBAH^b(jpwMviaCL9k=plQ&=Q$J?(msdDJ8FBwy$! zu^Z4g^LeAbRWEi|QEmbm$Fard>0N?+qF35K{+RJM10=nG<8l^V+PP?zrJZ|d-wNnq z>q;}O*FRv!jcM2Gg|6xUZOH%gJ+)=9geIm=ey(+;A^0CZD*yA@uGdRb##vsc6M4N} zTiWykUaw~#_xqLPb?NKDaW9Vg5|HgI4oDoEpwE82?wtq!61=YL9QelWN4$nSTo^s( z-Ss1WSQow0Us6vPyUiCTB9Zm)zjmFAmj3wfjao4)jJ`CIx+ za$x-C^$E{s`aU7$tSSe3zh}SppL5rE^?^&}Z_l53lp|%&h8gQ+w5tYv!Z$h3sQsWD zR=wC)LYdb^^tWsAN!-aNawYCV)W@Fm^HJzo&=VG2+9Pe1r9H-IhaBjx_KuPbsqKm6xk9$V+x)pH_K@}i^UQI6D0 zUUXoOey(|7*)RD|J$$aY^T07@zV*@C$3%|j?>x$pva|>NBW9oW<0f|L=Uwww{iHvk zteKKkAFI2p0O(GKlQIe*Q{zm^C%wPR}blj>JySuP=2;}n@X^T(Vi+rM2+AELxip3}N2ISN%y0l}{ zDoZ=2z}Epiv>o5%bNTBbz8~9Zqc8q#$I}iMyY2WMjrbmO@9XP4efniTGWFhf+>}1{ z6RDr{_h(Fevq0u|5oIICe?MS-*ik&G_KQ#7`;AFE+IAcRJGOaZ$sgXe-i;$U-iz0~ zq$SVQ&LgYdHBLo_ejbS3E%5h%9Iq1=pR_ai#13iC4C;#(pU|t2Q?}^R&NZtn?L0>N zHYq3M`GoVw5Pzc=;Xc~t469;uhO3}J8dFD5>Wa}s4E$Isu*k-wL$aOCaJ_H*a3 zp5xRhu;Y|PPv5iamY;f5>b-c)qaG=HEHlQbRzTm(^K8ee7rRR+*MN-Uz~YnkB%kP& z_KZAd{7eE#&*HeWMVEHYS!HSGHrp5Uuy!t~{H1-2Kf)yHBX<7Yfr{^awX)4+9~-V? z>K81iDS4D5^%9RB?1{fU*p4I1ep}C-&@(LkW#dyKP_SsmZ&x#yP$9P#R%XPsf<;h(QRg9qE5SaQ=tPd)Xy$@7vDucFeY+p!FL>p;e< zjWYGnjx}J%Bb#saxkX2B&M?H9H?tvw~I=Q@+c8R=T;*tPTkG&tci&pNArXxSHjf7||2FZo10EYm+JOMYQEk)ApEHDOO1C`5^y z-jAkh)r&txl&e7cGqU(3&&VfoC;9ZEi9;GldIra36}^vkC|GpKzp_=9{L6x`2D&@{ z7A#r4H@Lpdb?()(`<&p#C-4)wyzbM-*^Clb9!nfs_D!w>UI^xW7xjsei3g7pxuQ1% z`m}X%y}rfoTTENu;`1nV=y{{hqjbSP^?4Nay$>BPu4@swzNMc>Nxo#_Bgab|Q>ozk z))@BWz^CI_1%0;lEy?$WTIUISf0^r1%=dw1-{gGvH)F4Ue>n-d_#y2Z!S|yxpu3-w z@vdv`3+4^=avZb$mGOh$yS@h%pFVTPuYBlRYds=*rJm!|#i-x7y!}?q=a*UhJ;WyL z=>n;*va0=FjIZZD$obui!=G+_?kbb>nyu$j)L*^)cDvrZ?@g2OP~u%te$gKjA8-En zcN51Hkapxyra$!ex6t###&@3m??3GPSJuL-pKlS@?{f`!*)LPzcMzU*(4m3e#853 z)5c?tD@2Yj!)MHT0N2l}&?oXI?|9~6vC|%>Hb?#Yo_Xk~r~Z)tps8Q5 zAffb8kJL-QZo}?A?Z-OX7-b{Jx8r!|xitRT%Qv4Eudtru)E7~|;DtlBz36MNT`l!8 zPEn7PJ(d~sjmp@>PwHiS)$67;t6uERpj-eljxCE%#v}5HTp4$Is2^K=LXV>yebu)^ z#+`&!mT{+wxTHaMk2{`yow=R&_jU?WRHV( zI!5Xx9u3&j0WuyVeBXj{sOKff+4k|j9C*y{zx*xMvmKX2{g;mXY3m2O9{jwi_pU3I zUpk+n|1$AQ0%=DUW$K|Fe}|sumOt^H2mX28E3Bs-OQHU~<7*2i^tSqt)Jr~556kpl z%93BaJ|Om>e-N-^=6P>q)k|D!D7S$0C;sn1o-9E=(J%RwMt#BJ6M7MHN{T)}yHzc^ z*9P64e+w4xtHbAvY4?+Vzv|nJiP$PXSAT3a{P~icSDNZNbOim0|Cl&< zG8X?P*I(-SUq z&?B$;?J4rJpvNt`*BZw0{Qnw?Vh# z&IXY4HQzhrb3lCl>kGS`Gt$QhKlgzk{|NH;Tjt4Cb-qYGjN-xbW8%LiextHkAGLK% z+VNmR*Y6!>L9gI=@j>#wZk5IF9Lg=AE#LRsd!9q(Dc2`CPT9xF`IGAvAHjOXKJWO! zf-n5`pOg3N?DOl|Sg+XY`>Xz|b@(c~h)!wO`0K{+G?4oGC;R#C`LhK12`?XKE3csevwbg;#V8T4JJ-#jW$@w9nF8=tA zpOkvf-+3jA-)plO^UkqV@0xc;7ub2=?LPp1eZM|w@kx7-PwbHP$fCYv@d>>Jc@>K; z?NqnQ(oPxhwLlMRr&KpM4&?4O`P~HCc{|B#$eVqg&O2WZgL0>~|G?<|5fpy#;0yNN zI`Z(T5)XS^{Tk}Oa{Iz(_g#LpkJL}vf1!zc4ak1fKf<2}h#X!YodY@7{Oh)VocQ>k zHq?4{M*ZWJKOXwmd8`(H^Q=RvtA{pTu#uZ#L2(DnR< z*B%SFFIe&^|9EMq-WjHxUDD4Np(ju-SadIsX1pgc?>-Sw!R=xBeo|B0+$jMrKVmIHzVgFz| z6)irm-51uZvcz+Y_HHYB1nt?i=wfd(YVwljmw{C;cJRA}{GJ`-+_VK1iXI2O zY|+Ku$UB1hTC?iK4t{@;-`!*U?0j|QVeAzXH;#+^t|Gs?$2=Ssaf^nKfjmA@8HoMJAZ_a-#O%W@R;|tuLj3O z+C3cm@tN2Sz45mN?e2n}vgocn%UboWJZnNu!Qyk}8QZC1@kyRFt+Ln~gS?)ichQ~$ zi!Syy)(z&_*s2$MvFs)pIr)t-ZZ;t=_I5umlXk&4%kiA+8!3xV>@HYk&+hpHJWo|s z^aAL0MIThq|1G*FH`2ArllcMo2B331hC36G>$Qm5uY~sVd|@9a^G)tovIv2>^2qOw z&tGY;b48#%uU#MYA3J}gwHmu$^ixysUH2$`)Fbs0$Lu>yT#G=?d#flLIldhSLC<^d z{P;Ds?|kw+)^q)I1JpNGIq#aYA3gj)srTYFk9wpm?M*+4v6$b!GM?!5_=Ht2cK2Z4 z2*@~QEIv=~666!TlD7raS1mrFHzB8P(WRYRR$1CP4!$nvu6eKUF&|qmn0;6H+=SS{ zpDPZLW&JovzBK+Aybg-3V#bps_!vKtDSES@&pv&)*w;m+)H@nCw33M8l0c^z@PZO=})!}iGK%lJwGplo?6b2i?mDDDvRF{lnX#x zzOl;KrJvhpzO!H0$4URXhLC5UdxL-I*k z{2k)B*gJ!MC9JaeRR>=hbXUH)?w1y}GKk?=L_(&YnDBJJP zdi`vE!Q%6D%(y-r(|(Ij^p2M{c2ghUTd!Jtp8SO^t8Dw*f6>IFAE@`{8+fjR@9o{( zx%iiVczmhJbMw;9NxWwqUBURr`K82zKN*J_7a9AO1+lx+M(3_{#J?_)qR442GWv6~ z$Z^FZ3H}mL;yu29Vpk6JS&J@qMX*0u6!m$lUi9gG)akeGS2Y~hUC+M` zmVVW?%k|js-HEiFYy2U5?$@3V`U-te%E_;U9hdp)j z?Dj<7=ldo0Bx{C03uM1dT6`{h23wo+uf*MDPY!WO1fJLN))N!K^L@?IBlZknM+C>w zp0>p&<5VBz^g8}HB6jNWGxC1lUzeRF$cbBgVuv0-8K<?BI2G z+Ts&CiotTEW|d`p>tbHm0Nt}?#!s$0s>=oY$Kvl=Y-aM@K5k+k_Q~OM@a!+mbNzOZ z_K$wR#6dp?p8{Qs5j*>^FAKV@j|PjK*++xx23#NEcx4|a^F2P7vK{tGDZjMQ_~`w= zyS2!adamyriTx?|ef|59lNRpKHuc_nLrNd@Nc|*FVQ&w}>+X@|pKZtXu;U-6ul>9G zUpaFnqsO=7XxQ=euWC0N?+Vu!S67xg2HPv|k0SMlxej*rBxvb1xBaRS|S-7og(`z_3`!O?zx318TK z5WTL>d41S@khW!~_)|l+|E#suz30?km{q>e4>?eel9L{`phnaJ`!M6}ax6 z{g5ADS02RA_2qbeEWTe^vyK!0iYT`fJ%Mu9qKn`9{5G)a#SUI$6C0GFEwFFXCKO^cwP^Y|+Ku8uqJYf2~>dVn^8hm}&Qa5)uErKWT5oyA5QX zj+DNz`z<<8IUfzXk5c%sA18@R8s)M@cjal#su#N(4U;DwAm`6^o=W~Kw&&Nr-=eqF zGuMA3ORmtnC`Uiy+v&=mgjMg#pC;s_Ek0NN)Dic*#V7ewvC3js4DygZ`xK_>?%XvK+&V1k1V>_+sl|dVBSRk&-YX8DE-vLtp;TK zOv{_{rEe^6ib`MVB6D00$h@g3z9#CsK-#79W&!Wl*P_98t(}GPM}2=KetqbPTXa{R zrL21IxW#&M_XYJNQ7#7gBb|E% zj|JnB0X=2W#opL_4NYUHp8~*6(0e|PGK~Gq8PhTW$m1Ta|ZkXe9pnE>g_{nuZaqZys z3ZH9czq5~%c1T=e2$oOoXMmr4 z(T|(>Y;fx)kMNq1j!y1pDE>6~SK8&}o7na~zejmIcwJNkfAkJB-rDhyIM-1>{6(zH!A_u5-pO8+m+A^rhQJ=Y1-d{JYpHd6-zk_+40F?&DEj{%t0n!sq41 z66BMzv|k3t6@lQ3l&!M(HG*F?@`vnmlfE$+FYad==2v_bbE0&UxxQBN07hQa<|Q!*>7ilk0$X66OXq=K6tDw1u*Us53!r? zJ!c;@<6jQ;NIieje$++ed(ZVtO`h<5-3s){v6FQm+~=g;9O|1u(uH5_8GxQ?nf?*B ze?dn*_s)LLeqzg&{N?lL+}G&S2R?NFb<5?B5xr8+b(?K);P{af_gk>w}?Ul`7AF+(_XoTX{++r|)tHC7NcYM1kkM1zo`-Q>O}Y7NgVnnXCh@+)7+AXp_4gXA-Dj}; zTZ5(h4JIEl*vGz^{Xd(ybsjhLG~P?dJY~w+rw!)*gz}#ariKQ`&!YZ0gRSQc_TFOh zrX4kyiy2HTYcRf?!N|J|_JFMwOdhwFH}v8P28Zu4n0T+L&tjk0_KJp{d%wZR$_Aqe zgFWmA+`xX~!w(sH^&}0UJsqv@3vnfY*H5mIA>c4F;TL%3QgXz3Eu84B&P(!aChI+jB zlfnBS$s-ND53C<;%9UdbmcM5(d91Af9hx<%<@R-5;7<&9Q)W2@9 z6EX9{(maEs=Zw9v`KCMs))ty_5Bq4eUod=)w;6gOW-z|2!Ps&J`|mW^dzZn+yA9Tt zH&|Q2VEH`;3-2|UU&&zZeFhsJFgX06!NP|OMpiXA2KGK|%I&1V^hXV*K4vifaf4l8 zD`m?4H4XMYVX(B8!Tj0=TfpWzraTxM|NEZ;-)9Y0KWDJFKIluB@i+c?Qyy$+u)DFr zQr2K`Q-it94L09uj_Yn=%8f4?Oyjw{=vJm2%Nb0@4S#K4&`SoR-!d54-{2TH`nD;z z7a1%ZWH4Vgm^u{Y!wlvQH<($`=*fNu78uorE3heJVma^iY})jJI4?lhSFrNPXv z45qs%--YsT3=Zxwn7q$m;(mkezQOz-3^pGzSbGe(v$3Q9xGDFZFj&C;)y1bwxxKsL z8}4Z^hJAjce=_yCBK+CQU=RC?wuh#^hW#4L&zW-Kd4mn?cUBsiavS?*<^E>MJ?s+{ z$Nn${>=TlG)zo*fUqTn})pzh-cN_0P*CJ-#mzifUKHp$x0m=(eKFruXSi+RkZ!y>d z#_-(x=_o2KQULCmH!I+}F(EzGxozzlvDr$l$(40qYF| zU>Dc14P2*maUBuEd^7qN8{Fl!-D}CGDr(xfc`3oDLy?ydNJEpafBfj|hbd;L`iRrbw*`)azJ#JKyo%}p|7A7|g)}OuHx3@I4=K6!{Sj~)iPN@Wa zzyh}jg6u(O9 z`^uD82Oryk{DnE>v&%2aH*kVUBS`;zaw1HRxyDJI}b|({|Wt z$ESn+P3afqi(Hr9=qADTjy&nsn*yIL&(_<$()dfg)7qt?^u})v>gD*}bm*0K(feSt zKTI1h_@2NUwKMsJV0=32J4Td~1D_oqv9lA>&!^d0zHn~w>?u1FYCj0tIS#S25|VFW z{H>7rNtj=p4{-eAIBVyLsC)#btRq~kY$V9FuH?yX_xSrfYS@cZ$v)a#s z^2gw__1O8X+r#D)dsrqGHVx)YAtb(4@bNgYQ}i-kdY)nPd4JCs$2s2imHxbXe~Nxb zHZykGawSgDn^b?qdCt|o!XNu}ke~8h=LhGv%!jb~+(_+vPx)c?q!j;b6B3zNrj zC;ivi$6by$#2)+}0~22~@yY_l9*M)?d3Sr2z-Pxz{G&bP<^DJ0U|-qO-Zj{ci{rAT zdpyXf{btEOtsU7vm?zp#j&r>3aPfJ^%oykDu(JbXoU`gZO7_d4!!MCbdx*TAp}e%Z zK46|@wwf6yJAd<=nePxXP9l##m);uW36JDU^15KYP;c9zSNJ1pUQ2%0{K>Yn)idJ( z`Dvq|%g%HzI3A4dRCeM#Q2-y~D)Pk6gu0Gre5U15{1UStH2Fmye=a)*%FfmuK|3iY z`lXreD0X)43i2~AU3LopK<(2{`Crq%dUKlu^)jxp{7gG-z54v?>011A=`BE>Fp1t;$oaSG&@22I zy>2qgdcS=>DxGTlqhE`S^!^Y&UJp#WZs7cT+I2%3`)KI(0b8%c2d~jZh&(SxzhdH^ z0_K4gpvaMU4AlIN{x!j8w}oKh4lL(`0RMP+NWf#pNoI`dsvKj z&mm9vhpK(1}S5VRyFOz{IF;t+YsZY57cma5c6Zs!bw}oDL%rujd4=7KU)tWL+Sg*XJQDxv z>U(9BA9la7Ifv^@k>3cpPw0C7#O~)@ucbYyvpJ@?MLK`ZoeBL=e5CK-11%R zBylQ)v}@RWzM$T#W1L+5LgaTs=CQ7Mm_0u5`jzr^J1|bf=GTMy61&|UhaUKN9Q$WW z-S4H|P`^Ur7RKLD?-4P7!}v#P9db5%?6~EQGS8uxFwRel+hEUN+@c}Z1<|76({anp zas5SqUw$^fB!42AVE)g>FL7W$?(Y;n5Al4M@tz>>=VbBR*AV_PKROS)^C`C1%(&R& zAJ@IPj-}g!;~tUgMJ33k{*3xw4&~KD^z(Xcg#C`0Z+81h95|mKhRrKR%AVdH!FHki z_%~+8L)tN>)=Ouze==^&;ru(vlfSy#$JM{={?a~c_WP!c7csVXu)kzN?$@Tl$K#|O zZN24tZ<#z-%zV~)!Q+TkrFXQgJN_+)UWrd$U+>_0dD?wHJujVRXKJ5dd=eqo9eME4 zKaneT7DDpeWvB4h^X@o=tuHrJo-hx?(SIIf1>Zz`yD7`Cq~55@jUh&`@;E&Kz; z&wl56?oRk)zj@>RLikH+UQPL~`G!5t>E{o0o^X64@;TD{H-q_73z;8Pz-Q-+_xIFw z1J1{|ZlKpo8zI*_eTP2rm*eWRaf9P2F>GAT?icjGtiG$r_?N(E`)|izUr$YoKkp~@ zmHuqV{pLu?*lFvRe5tALjnUq)`D14g%*Sc{uNh*Gt3S;a58H0Z8|ERA@fgBSjz`H5 z{jqP&jE9{cdYx43XI>D)@}menv}d$~d%UZK*u!-h{hW!mhh^ee>FucdK^zAY`_CQ+ zJ^#>oN&ktwp3>{ZCFo%s5+V0F>JED(Pt)qY!nAR@rSf_je{^GayM#SAPzbp`4O>r4 zsP*G%_EbWivkdDu%#&&BkIWBZ;(*}zH3&K1XTitg*pA7S<`%cX9Im6JKhiIKzhCDe z?IMnqUo|y<_`0NeU@-qWySeRefzQ?>?KDu=8MC$1 zgkPr3wV^uTB95&J74{<_wa z>^v^NGk9I4`y0=@M9v3`<)FQ#kojN@e73!I{QCIL3EM~OXTKnZop*-Ho}RiNK>4wQ zXO076562&UA5YsuKZs?>6FzB&M#z101`j7aVQ+dmIZrF27#W~zJ68YIVuHSd(7|-Gy zpza-TCmTB>?s{3Tq&I6^*g5xO1^|1R-mAixa zGfjRk7nINb>w5l5@*xqj?jP1)iW|A*hdpQ0`*M(<@eGsSQU22YF#d>o-g~zA*yF0s zH#-l!zh~S>?0qMgSG|zD8iUW4Cvnb%toys3-?RJ0v~@I&zr?U{xO_y={(-ulW}F+~ z)AkQS=G(6I9q~7o4YoVwyVlq2cHw))Y)9J;;p21RwY|+efqeFOA$(lVFDx|gAC#ud zi+hkqJGDGMk20EtPx6NM_lU)ciF*y$1`dGHBZKWyQgNn#De&3xkT~~3-tQ0VFGDq+ zQ+^nK_r|%6Kly%;pYaSk-$g>M%fjC4tG_##S8Ug?^J8NU^K?58r_F!Z4#d$>svX1T zIY%2l9>?>}Amq9}Y(1<$$M+{&ce>jp>^+){IxozYClWW#8>h`zIZhG7#;fFagYis< z%wu!l)A4Moyk#D`^4zvxug}`!fTv@|^<|j-LuG#=p5jNTR;2WU?Le6}93zY}u* zBkX+FQse4u`7iP#A?+J>zbg4ApFh^?qPCwBPnL<*V}o(agsgwIz{le_E>%LtXIEai z^z-~jd4nB;?Z&vKs_uR;RPU9O-=$yLp{C~7%!_IBj%j(yxDW@hmwrV;*0Z9=x&0cc z=ijFJl~VIf&ZEQbKUUQJM8+X3Zi$d~c0F$+aZaiET?z9m*L942Ue)U>jHkrWl|R|< z2lICnvW`*$pDl0FFV%T$wm8^!R__hI4<+{T=dyF8?5u?3L;U!VeCP(x&$H!&Z725u zV?NMEL6@C%=$HCQe^K)S>g|NsnNZ^>`NQ(6F~{q<%$vNP)9)wRdEkmel)G*1l1Ar>-k?SW6n zp)<$lxC(Q8uArdi9n?v+Z`}UH+6{92z0>&IP+XZ*R^Wprw= zT{2}fIU7QxT(p|y%!fbv?9LjIP2rPw)^c0`dsj<3xL-@cWR$$MwL{#^HPtAFcxuxn9tK|6Sk+ z7(YFjM=3QwV>@TSr}L=2eQ@4D{?K(=b>5gQ@5CRThlqUcn9n~;94GDmv^zgzXUuGO zi6_Uy)_dkQ?=C_f^>+U3)?1sRSKkj1dHlKZe4zA>)b$zT9zAn*f2ZBAXZsTKkSDfD zoC{C7{jE6k3V%k;-)X07JQV&`$b2wtov5JhkIt4)B0sxEFkg8-a@k|&iJtGXtpr`| zRjUX4RVHM<-v%G!E%HP!$B${_0_Q!`#s$uIh%m(BYn3@kQ_SdnWxbSD@czs<7IUk43`+Fh%-}OGS z*wdK9d`tLK>V1%DNUpq*jQb#y-K=69{Li~MTHI2*RU+*8lN(w?w> z*i!3Cv*o4OGf?B;H2&lq$DM?_j+rLE5Hep5^S3s~^F&9D%d^=d`OWh*QP1NyeG6WaggI6ie%p3G*C9cO)Ca$20rKMBS;5i;LsfKSJ{x^pleX0ucB zEf&(>!=77deEN;cmpJhHLSLWTc6)!%7_UO-KR*q|XB@KsPZNB$o=N|jLtcsfyl&)k zXkq<@>qA6-&x6m6WiB#yhdnpeQ|tL`w<3SHBlz+ac}7 zGBMo@wofNyeWL(A9w+_6)~ok{u=%{dXXtGyz0D5<^OWO3-=SCXVl>C`AQiHX9X1~t z{x&$S(;nCRgkn$UGeP@HQ?5JPYFqXnd5!Pn0iix z@p0W>m3Su9{A{-T7yiK<=YOd=&gTZ&9?T2E?muVL`#2njT-QVPxT~)__4$YMLn7C= z^?R7(ON0HoqQ(>EL*g>SXZP1h{M9u@8w5`2q~^Ac3@eH3#29_Cjq zgg@*)ZBNbH*q>bTB~KU!Js#M0dw=+0C1@wxB?mqpC*zpifA#vB&FB67hR2hJ zvZoaCJ*uw59*J8=ue)L1;fkB^XVm>7j-O%tl`VqtA%EC9RU%~H1K0Jf*ppK80?H5D zZ?B=w!{iUMzc9!63`5Q@u6z*tTWUR>_Jpm=CFVG9O3ZQI*HHYNcZAJTa<{w3^RV^$ zp5kYJ35$P2&4U=9F#eK~KaD^8CZFrp&ztK0%QCTWZE)Nugk0xW!N=od+>ks;s5r1) zT=PNi*cszT*gQ|~3s4C;??r!Z?ALZxLdFBv{WyF4n|7Vac@!~hKGlF-j8jT|w~OuH z4Y9wY);Gu>wx35PWc&!r_kvo-rTnn`jj443^1J2*c08x$BjZR6i|6P%m8Uzo$M1N1 zWV=;!vNefXP8epaAIj+K5;`J;QhX-=_6KWA&_vCE#Y_{6Rc#wQu_Tw@x1wjQxR z7t+42`-u~OL$1SJ{Y&^G>N=MByvj_Web zkn!8~eH@9;NbS4Dd0*H%LRHD1cD@?SVLjiDzwW>6D}t{442ys3#$fz2A?KMs_;mc+ z>b~MMe=BM{oW>ssxt?(4r?gipq`!nc&s5*qJzj;)9}7eGcoJq$M71ybSC~BswcqTt ze2b{>XprCao{q$)r{vQf*Zf-YZSi%X`tGC7H|7N~aZ50-66*fT;&ulgj}y6*aY?NQ z(N0&K19nb%{+oJ;U1et@E!2Y72pDf%F>@U@2-0`o1PxqIO zI)5!5heMt}OsMB*Xus?F!qfH2T~J6&ApU*e5b=s{VEpI+N5DGv+3o@}8ydbgu&@!z zz|_X3TmbfgxlIhc3mgMWUoi9rFrGE#EU*krZEEOEU~)54&I7B!HgE`xZw`6DE^rJi zZDHygz~&cCIlZO9A~3d@*mY%l{X0V4%NPXYVD=q`qy1{Q&1U~*Se zp9l7Uk=-B{^%fKeE4~*_>>eIj?unz13$H3$_4Sy3D z-w$PAvSiA6U=`Q~roUzCyTHu;rrZNYzHQ1WU;$VIc7P*b@c_eL2X=v(MTTAiCJ!{_ zJa7n%A7toRU>O)K8+sbp24)X7^bRn0h$&ZqE#LqcJJi%?fF)o9*aJqezgh~|0gix) z!;PFAumWrW2f)~OpbuCAHh}RXOnnyE2SzJ~o(7hVH01`c2aFtL=qX?USOa!|>7xx_ z5m*Oyfn#9xyN0g~%pPOPWndH72S&eV>g&KRa12ZyYwGjB9xzfh^c=7PYyp$U;W%Iw z*ai-P@$VbH8n6RQA8+VI-~bpq!O%0n5^xBNpJ?i{z%pYKnm zFj_P8Ixu;PDK~&UVB}OoPXP2OAmw=ViO}Pae0MloH4oseD z$_-!-7^xe23RnR4fwdo+`VMdetege;zyUD!BSX&sOTY%O2aKEzy}$yn2J8Swz{EL* zKL;EDW9J%r71#z2ftmA6eH%Cg#v6v71(tzLU>_Jg-|(e@MPMD+1*R@Ad<9?)*a41! zi3<&14p;%UfCFIu$A+&8Yy*eD_)koI7T5uffQg?%4{!jCU1aD@U>_K58hQmd1|}~y z^gOT%Yy*eD_$7uf3oHYhz&;rQxQ{M%Sfu*YqJ@PYyDPRFu19pHTVB%`Sp95BaE#LqcyT|7`fT-rGN!s4cGyWfW=!3e;pXR)s!2+9x&1|^ct`O903!znfe^C0&D>X zz}W4EF9R$A8^9hga);qd0Xx7EF!2jhFW1fS$o$CQbI@5$F>KT_5dl8h|HfC+v*pS@9p&NH}dW{Yr#_g_sL&9BRpRH{Kx}_j?3D}+xNWe zkWz7*yHGzbf%@1Y^Pc#1@9u2#o$YSei1iuN=dQeMqUYi*e*Wu~ws`S$))!De+|t-_ z*?EWUURqH3veb(|Zii9Z#{YXA>@=weO6Zv{OQjB{dTL+3gT`I8IWa`H>K`7?NKP0JbM{Z(yG?1OIk{kOR3;}E^^ce?HA zzM{F8TLX+j0_f4LP5ujgw!Gi%fc^I0VwZ#WTXcY1PaX2k zIrLw-!k!A09y{muNq^P+-4#rG#~;+F-zZrLMr+S5_=_-S`I{i8U|DHYb7W-%Qd!h6BW7|)mFDVYoPw_8hr~$gfg>s0DM-FxrffZmqXkVnb zjq#_Y=!tijb{i>rAtYb&=m&|1egDNiwkMJHi96C>(S42noOPVgGg!wiS#*)dcoHd( z{<2?Ce*b7AzhTLl$j9@cJxyQ5$2j{hs3?Hu94rg`0eqPdGkic*S;l3;y?PL$&az3_u*IK zv0xk$A>&IA<7-aw*Fw%SG0f8{ioX*w9>?$;TPw)Fcs%0sf5^ARgOuO6(zIjS zk|TOMn7<7bJ^Bgvd9R22o$)7v?Vbzak8OwiSN!FW{+L65F9-Skc6@{JZ{m2ypW|fM zd7+;*{&s?TBg5s5{n3H%uf%_4v^z0^c|!`=2S#x|O#}PDD9$r!U=-tW8dwDmfpLsa zSzrU$+b2DPRFu1179^NFH@De@t6+FHWzr-w@x5 zxNTF~V>fT+yw@R%uSR8F=wFW(o;2~kc>L(4cW?8BE#xq{9<71y$)5cFdf_JXPhIE5 zo1`Gew@}aP(dTQKFK%_kc=7dS5B0nrJ^qOwtkrnsp5u7@2=%-kUFRpOMjp#%_3G!B z_A&FNM-ZId*S~wme=U0H8pvN<{}}4edGdq1Zm`<1J=8CeO`7j}j1Dz^6pnf44)YRH zi*|zkx*(fDCcKAr2^E53>EKocGOFslMs2 z+xtA-^;Mm!I#qS*oO^TcS;GJ8{9@dzxre{5KBs)(hC1%yr=9;T z%$Gu3X63QIvG6&UFP}bn&liS4L)=o3V_eSL`ph5exaUyL{Q3KakG+VlA-VP%pJxeK zmfwT54BKb)ySfH_KfUde$|Ya=N0_5t@hfic?p zv>mUa1(L@V=x3hRo<07qK*VuKc?0Ejj32$qULTo?jmk&k&t<6p)xDoP|1a)59Q z=L;M_-sF_fd14mkFA^)8JE-kUIBl4^N%<%`KyJ) zywLGvzkm6uyAPil=#fk64gH_1YI`}_EeNUbu?=TXk{m!wSEgX0Cqz2Cfb z-2ogEq&?ZsA4GdzeCQwFSpQvfw}<>x0&(~+lpnD1tC#)JyZdC8vw!{(<#%nFzxnAy zue#5cKZf$}ZFR-Ek6stu)t3Jb<=2;=eC+=8F@Le;_n`dhZFj%u{Jriv73H&eA7cOc z(SkX<=>AiAcD(<5?4@^aqWez)<&1N~@PF{l+=+huCj&m)e>$Ll_NZ4rw7UNDIQ$8{ z`i(tycxuUTJdu1&{q3LY9|_|}7v78hps^y?oD@F&5yZX>#z?jP~9-Tj>U^5A>y=V$Hf*FVZA z=XspWFXsRHn23J-q4mpppSb4VS@vDPQvbVA-ue2QiGTgVFTM`>(fy72|Kle! z-x|yR=f?B@N0)#0PhlV?_+PGXdV_EN8#&&0I-vi4({FWWnQ>L}JArcBZ^Aui z=lMSkwr3Bbv&#L-)W<3;caof zzIn#+Fb%%1ZvNxj^mrKg;dq`E!FSKQD-ZbPSrz46KY@0f6~+F^{C)C`v#a+@nOyQb z(SuwazhCY@Y3ar6t5P0%3Hg1o`+d`U%GT?&J^r z=I*}T^~E=H`}p@D7i?a&bi>H1{+00lhxHY|>gtQWf;{?kb%TvU<8tzR9J~~E z!Ojf$9}FJ;LC%3027mCMw0jKxm%+FB)aH+K&dl)rEa*+-zsQPQ>d^lfzNaVwUbz1c zUgPt#$a$~A&ieFtJ!tz^*yjj6yr)S6Ht_x+j^6=QJnuAd|H)x|XrsS%VP6FGiG5Ok zf$ujJeNg{v?-7Q4?Sa>qFMf8cMRj(HY!==<&G zE}eJ%J2Mvxljz+9+=SGB`idnB&N*}Gl4DjZUOa!|etINeKQU1Pz}lT*HNoZ@%fne1pnAMK$X*$157 zj;c@mm@N#0i!k^PXFnnJ5GNFwLAy_JUO@zMpnC;;ugn;F-@jd^M&Hq}PEGXq#kmT7 z^b_?>@q2AU)#oSQMLGSVJmcfNKHYw65}zpe85ct8WqcA!uk@Gdj;=ilhF(9_xBa~& z)}0!=z4}~#{xZ%B(){Aj;NS2f)aBBi)kj^vhTfQt!+;)$0jC`N3ow6^ia+E9*2ySb z{7qs%uDqe=u)mzK!|Pz52ulxQ9-z%D5Bs!R{x0^5v-H$Q{o_{pwYv{k{yf&q$gNez)$&^|53M}=YYpX$V;TFev<XsdVD;oC#FOvAEPvLgpAY)gYrMY`;%B~h{=#KThc|@5fAaho!S~SM)V;&! z=Dm*k#>t1=aKg{fzoufKo9B>;`j@X*u)t4$7J5$l*2iA?Z1jfV_ZGSTlt8!R!n#mG zm;xXD=Y5oT4dwQJ%=t!5l*2Eth;cBqj`N%J9QG5WUea4B|Mtxu>`!lDKItlYCf)y# zhn7E-^w*!8z|ZdqR!?~oe?2^h-ts4~Pk^QK9Cu6SIpvnl^TREj=Y(52&jYt~Z$iK0 zIoP&e^So=Tr#In#&+~*We`jz1xbeJS%io*Oe|i3?<>xu1mR^}K&huPI%g=KJEuH7h zS$Ylo&ssXqceC^q_Mf%%8rFNTKcc@(asI3sH&&Vd%YIE*Tz9NLP9-qUw_@m=uWa@6 z_ZeXea$O_e$9pMnz3KY=o=2i6H-1m?c_g9a<^Ip}*s_MsbJ2_*kLQh9I?vfMarJn9 zmF4HTP?pZ~jBNi%O=y3fD`fTX{2)s&VxE=N&vRcaKhJBibe?Ns={!e7)1{pT|ArSK z$A9Ku_Vu3+?`PfMc>7WhVQ_s{ZXxw>K4}DepnE)bBW373FN6BY&vPp*o#!Q3I?pq( zbe=D*t;(z%bArE|Y9OXt2|md^dWES>vy znfs#0?@N}S`%-DTjKe>WL>*j&S-dYU0G0u3fK9*-U>`7q_mokbz%t&W z)c~7-9l$DGP)4g{H1I7T8fEmC%UD0ZV{Yzy@F&um>2$@3I778ZZY~1grqo0b77wKyMc81B?MC0W*Mkz!G2; zumRWx>;VR6JG~LWIA97e3s?Xw1J(eWfE~a-U;U!w zLwF8~0ww^{fH}Y-U19&^mn-Vyh4}y{zd*6T!im-sCVl81)n~5{<6~! zUU>S#vkyGyoMoU3(DfCd_o(-ud&)-PTknzbf!&-e3z=8;_w*WPq*>irHc1wMf}e1f70=lARoc^md<|Ax2J;*ococ-`_=OP(2sf| zAA}yfrwPK&*tU+|!tYw~N!qUtzuSO9mw576 z2X@S=;e8qP?fTmJ40{>p>6wi_UTW(!V5d z>J>ThF9SO9vcknbt`F97YvW&C=@b7l=3Js1_kX1zb;~9G*>a(ae=X>tf5FYi{fh$E zc8Y%q&_$2nd4-FA+`oa}BZN=<~8EB6DSJ;Epc^L|0dcCBwQ-mW>N zPyDOn{z!d)-t(5Q=#)$H)|Lx>=pXdZzXovn*8xtwA}9XzRsF+ueXomyl#74d7evdg zjejYnPyCDHd4c-2`PYZ|(|PEhEf+h)zby37zY1{r*8onvA}9W|RsDj8-Z$7) zQ;`$@n74#%zv_F(+b;%vtalO=z2bip&uQeVJbKETQYM$QuPqn4_@6{QBmaSq{5N)p z+|Yl}iHEkD_J3f*D;y*U*-z=`n)hA%giOjKln0fAXJFCYQv)mJ40t5QF`U zLlrpV&;(AsA}4X^D8B^{N2cQ-dCvJ}T5j<7#D1K3-*_Ixl|J#WgndY;Z=a1GxnFFN zOZ>CtLKpv1&_n-EvJ7m=%IgE;PkHuT-z!BR8;+fw-qk_asMVQw>tlNTaCA0U+EM7y5{-z{)5;1 ztN0+7w4W^(y0l+t8y6?~mjq7#vcR>S;!go|(Ia?W;o=|nL(y_;<6m3p6aU)yJw|J>R@uLS7C^9mofALd(VxwY}Htn>}r&)i2}_~tj8 zQny^p^wQrpaQfRf^@^PM7uvzafp}8k(rz5=2zlS6Uz7Zq zM3;KR&s2PTTz&kneZJlp`f1BWPW;TmKKj`JPCq-q89$K|Kl{or!DBm4`z`It`Mev7 z050*L&r5`SK1yvn-mWR=W4$v$sY2qA!2V<8UwqcCPqTh$Z(A;9!#JQm#-RzEap)R* zL{9wnqSJm09#{CF^p$rCd(+>w^>c0crS4%|@IH=l*=?Kmjs5;fm~xSmxTN6^ zkt!x|fv6C4Sp-p%423?4{o=;Pkr(T*q1b4(>AUcS7OP-keX!_pnl*Up&~}y&cBe zI|F^JcTJ(xBk{;?Jsyu8pS<8eDU(a$VatUs@yMfI#-jtA@$hz?kpG~Io?-qgd|>-3 z``{Rib`JXs<^d0E99|b}A02(V9`+YgE=&@q9QSg^iL9s{T(Zf7;@}IuzqTwC}QZDhZY`TT&*M#L1QmUE)-Q ze~eRN_whJofZI6bK^Hv|x0=EwZ@53FmXrALy&56MoBU4WdDBw*#J?8y`=q`CtLLcTQ^w7T!aE@!iXdA?e1ZT!nAed1r$ zydT{D2e0bx9wp0A+tNI0x?d9Sidc{BPN2}%5#=n%(H_Xp{ z#_!*!{5tz_sY|Y5ewuQjOZ#P^hyGQ7)4v9AZKwFtR`m-W`oOqRX?>*i>tiRcL-@pB;)Ij@4SvwyU+Z@V^C3vzZ?ikDle*-RcDCh07r!IWPrq}( z>37N0FLL5{6?Ebqg^Pb|M?yZ2GH-3ZT3qx>{>I-i-k!mJg-0a}{j%jECw_VRxVX`; zByjqb1hRt*$@oR4J27+Rv5?UHojr zKKdDpJHP2?3OMzOocNgqop?pz;wOJk5?ViJ%FCI`rC#wngZVeK@6q-FWAis`xyXs% z4cJS+qx+8godiz3A}4-lKqp>Sxb#=fbJuc%zb8KD1$Q4GhwDn8_?O2#DC&FW`7ixm z>Xu8|)s_og{A)oE{R@6*+`lMr>J>ThF9AC7yu!sluGi6WYvW&8=^OfIp3~oZ)^~4_ zy5$=BXUc^x{?(v|{&j&fZ-e_ef3=rvY*ngN&ZZt zOFhH!=EU)FSLotL7WLDQ?1^qaTl&#JIpZU8;zwKAJ@jk;X}`peorQ655e7GNmLk4GWbr;ejrYM;rLvR>AL^0-pObcUP+F0Z&B4ENpOz7W;f zuAKWXaGwP3ix7i6_X*(o{Coy-_};{I@?8JU_3m89&UNLD1x~Jl->X~?9)_L*e&?03 zuAl3VJj1l$=bE15%41m1&UJrW=f`z@T*t?Ca9rOO#=NZ}zDEWTPp&KDx~nwa19M$f3cr(T zcz$W(y(rf|aa|MFF>zfH*X?jU4%gXm{Y(wt^|{_f(n#{Ri#!V+;POrAlD~Y8CggMH zVP`HmXW=s8@;u2`&Zo{D=;WK>Ki>S)6V}N|x#)S9{4ux)`JH8Yp7!*lY0+1Po;u)h zuWWYJO_yJPv*;L%bAeI53~Z zbPcbhDwp__k+*3@7d?!x2#KE340@Q)6{CmkM?LKs^f2$cMi2Wt^+XPGeopd>`5ptG z$cbOf7wXB*poje-Z}c#qsi!uR9^`w&=wUyjp8gDanE%0pr`vfDgH?VX<`KUJU=Vs! zfMviAU{vWF_8a79LeU5HOx!na2 zN`2yY7WCAc)BDT~?ZEu}+>$$o>ys<-_Wbpa`@n-DCwB0AG9jO@&RBNllGD^4ZNe}5 zDyXLcSP9(v;O(EkXbPRZ$$Dnwr#deVUZb%CiQ(TWhoa-y406+aR>pDZ(7^X{&gZK7y7^-FQ;%FxAe2F zeV(p<`*`Y-c4OR1kUQaqXaBC_R`aP};>PtHQm@3L>%*tx)K_+iom`(G@;WYDk3kz- zkPCgx#UlzB@~KaB$u-cwP8@u|y`sW(Tr#&~f7So~uLkSXaj8P?`J>NWtmD!IoieCr zit9iG7yrGFJG(WXj!OvTw3F*P1lMulIu7dTqW&o46M!?tC1vWXC|t*-kAAw{+xymp0^n^0$xPuk)o3I%VM36xW>yE^&z+w)(gvP!9Rg zIugNkT)1w8^@Smq2FwA@6qkajucdGumsZn_FH3*$(s8U);==nv4{~>W`^rD~-50vI z{bG1O-eKjzAJ_7s!(BXLfG@P-N2>e6>=fvUTV1={TligTRz#xV;+aD^bqZa^FRq6n zU)6_C_tQGcA@6ZLi{Lu$T))Emdh3E+ud`|n5X57kgEc|cyx1D*W8fBwx!wR{tDUBJUv+_IkT z55Xf>&2woNu4fTHCH@H?KHV-UlncMySGYb!aNRCkk3t)xkjnxV0B35KlButwaNRD6 zL)~-L%9DRSmvu_JFfLxo`M+SR5B`siO9XVvz^^H;gArW(Py6ucxMWcdd5`N_1lMul zIu_QKfLsBv3^-FV}+AGtnh- zV_c$;n}7AazteF^f=)X{ujDJ&*$6KF7kv11TuRC=89%vhM&xx|xK4)kWg%AuYyi#_ zmzJq7a-4r$Vm%j^aQ5pju}+<@3CJDx%U|E@m#?+;-G2Hn{bHlrw0s6~1;AfCv*=d8 ze2qNs>c4ikKmCW6uRyK=_?P!S{T1CV9ndKwag=u9`XIq2{^3tJzcrt3mnh01KU(i2 zxNaA&?-}WVTmmo+I8(c1O?`ER>wJyuIm{9P%F52??&_!gWEcFATXfU=DDmxD-r%Ersj26cCqB#A?e}r;bYx za_jfE8T(xjO0Vj#V##ieZO z>ndEwCG?Q%M|W=Zy(?L#j!W=(=l?UeA3OHmAqqNW;MZv1dcnp2j1QlVOAh6bAFWFg zT*rm$kXT<5az(%j;7oC;nfkmFoPScEjtkEL+yBTbi>y=P!rw~~$o+D&pDpqm-;)1u zasADHug}u*3CLvtpZHsEA2q(sE`Xlg)4hlLmme;CN&jA|pqx6zZplZkuM%A1+xFqp zaqprW@}u=pg6p_*JrsX0H7NHf7q>9rOmUBbkM-phuH)Xj!o}_3$A1x~k2>yU$o=fh zx90oBz3{S=f9~unPuB8v$h83<-Tk5qb=>=)XTRp;FT3=N7v$U7k6aB{lu74t5 z%7;(KJ%e)LmvMmWlmypt=ei`mPmV(_4_E@6Dee_hUr*sW?&%Ah-|e@)zEa1H`5rpS z`G5HhPp;z^_x6|F`}!x|zHb{XAA?*9aPEccb#>fxpeHVL^}qh-ubnIBU&$qLE1{e^ zg)aHdbw%WB`ta$vw^0uH(Rv`kb=%{%;56u40U&zf>XD1WazZ+h29uyP%gIclEFQ`#qbi zml11S+=Hk1=X(<0k;#|v;nQ(Xp|yN>(MO3J2o z?xWwi?Soz1uZ!p2spZ>{>jVCL)>&iE$Kg}``vcdXh~E-~lM_SW)A$YlW+e(C#1`Q>Z%x32!s+#fut<%^K30={@x zqNv-Y2|8sE*D0>I5nST$EnGFPb-RR64*Ajg8NqeCaJ>xc>!SWBI&C!$s#UucT0VNb?UgZA-7I;vLFN7;c_KFpcfx@`8xZzZy!G^B++p3%%Pk*g)aAd zt~(-M)rU{_(>lr_KUzN|xQ;v53(>|Bp-*hfn)mQ}xR8CD##&y!Jc4x3iDGV~db$0(Jmr^1Em1OPuBJ zcYkB&_t~G>_MQ6oOa}bcZ>~q8-(?>@?RQnxD}Hkwk@cJFhWLA?0J#QW8*nDSyQaSQ zr^oyrJzw$M)6d*^VV*wfewK#ZtGlebtzSPYUFPEU;W_P#w0s_NWx&_Zyz_46uNE;0gbIE03NY=2;(f)+uq6e#mtvY?s&~=eOq5?UFz_4bA3h!T7RniSu7eR=$DQk5I6hV(*QNYY7l)bR9s(ch%P4%{%PU(+!Qdh+B%R*! z#~iGE+`;Cd4t5T6FnxrBJ$%m(;yY{s-zUTPZWY7#ohH6#bnsrk&-dnde_6!)J`eA8 z@^~N8!~23Peg}H^oe;+JYz@zkO*}7k@Z6BbeIbQ$GKuk|gMQUV{^e9W2JPha<~hF# ziav9M%WuyUp2W}l3+IuMuMc~oXFI#BexCbEehbOZyyQ8$#K~Wrpx-m+ z>yn?4`uUxo{fqw8p|@-Fb5o`IEY}~&p9WuenZLgkv(B1!5Yisvxs#lJ;ueyh_4jd( zF8T7XqdLJJo(F5=NqOq$d*}@OWxU$Z8(i-1Z{(BC{+aZ%zQ&UA^G8W1q&?Kf`!mbS zu!A`HX>VjJXAj?ZWx?Mx_VYY&u7{w$IQaU8e@CfkaHTeI`q^KTh)?t!|M;Y_u8QZG zvmQdxsrxU#Q?uMc@-rVw*cXp{Mc7fFU=QcrvArorNd3fnIDe7tK{_G%X-@_F3K0*l zaB)cjlArNQywk;#@#(_uyy4$R1P51i9mmi9nFfE=@Y6n?gGSs!(W&Fl`NNivIQi*c z?h^ZNb6H-5Mo_ELgCY_M{v^RU; zcz!lvM}LAn4eVPzlYYjB`vbB5==sQhK-$A{z8|4|q!U{Hv^nRSe1znuKCZ7}c^!6i zC)m^7-^~jrzlGFKfBT1y$1{8Z@*j}=9M2jU&xsddN8a%7CW3>D^Fc@cpq;9Q{~*Wi z^>P2*9(W!7y>0j}ApeHWe*S)G0_nj0U(sTGd%KIJZgw#*}ytmvr zo-EJ8j`9S1!uz@3o4j9Aj*$9^+w*-%CnP`Z${Eo(Q z!u$mNd|yvK3$1>hZ@yd#1{e9;MnB_`#5#D|Uj<+AU&sCB^B30(P;V0aal^m8tKQ4K z;^M>p-bFiQ4L|kqJYnJ%idyN9w3p{GTfXK5{ai<9`H53M?}zE2v!BneedvuA#^XbI zt}h~PA@$S#-Yet%y$HROBR}!vcFrE+7FvFLe)1%K_V<#}--SKli^l!s^Cst$Qg0pn zNyE?fx92~n!Jjw$`->xki}T>v9%aP8YWP`y3BL!K-=q_YPCcIIKel$yw=sPGqQ2ng zTwLOSRzKINlixz}Gas_ppThE$C+IKFTeEy%{CJKt^*5onKS6(OfxEwu-$L3?I_Gh* zKGF%v&wR7zHK#9j@hk$8pW_ebD^WfQzPjP(xp|qxTztr%g`Zu+Px~79y}zdUllk1Z ze(E8l{j5KKs^e#SCqM7}%>$C3@;pD8{G=0-pXJ$Ye-(Z<4gc;=otIzF#h>GO z82o+1PkT!#$4}fsQLD$3TyM?#3*+P6Hf~S)3&?*!tDp16C_l*_<}cT$kiQPS-3j{b zIntB#Gv3{pv!D8tmpc0?XYCJRA03ukNPdnV1?;!T`ts0U1tdT9@SJDj7LuR(xUY%j z3l^OpueB#iXHTwB{%l%`huMI!ThM&JzxK9lE!{Bck{v*Y( z!PPzA*>kZ&y(sdaZ}_i7d2OZRKLB_e_uc4a2rqQ0b|H$cxAdKL7%p_f1}DZ2Q1>v!dv z8u=N;`>uxKlel*9p4rlQZkVMv@w>*-IbYe*Yj|!n^g!~9{_%=|o&jXM!oc%}?g1|u zdKZ3H4ZQ_=W1Q|WJ_*DV^^W3W>Gapo1CcBJ{R)B}2c%y;*pV8ikM@bM`V0R0NAnFW zf6a$q-&gsavk5+qFNBOkdQ+G8R)6ThA%jAWwe&j^TIaEb=CY_9`fT8TWGdzGLn0_}DM}-6LK8n|Aa{JNwcD(W_UD zgXC2R^aLRDhx&~@gLx1B`im3v=RmJ0{W>4`UA>NS#+{JyB+l>ZGqo4{FTbmkzePK~ zG~HjcJ^Ze2^Nsb>9zJ*TyLuXWW6+yX`lY>i|FZ4H`ff)ss4t9iu}$)!1$s=;<@s!{;q~I^`I!6gWE9^pk8yswrSp7d zLl0CS&v?_0BIxyT{ec|tmZDETe@`VKKYIT5u9KZL;uz?Fo=|k% zzc|k&jdJ!|LbeCbOB>lP#dhpt@{t#$@9#M21 zf6g0avwhHSJOw2wv+RBI;*i$`1#z(`As#$ z-&ghsKcDM3zp09NrN9@xZaSXA&*wVMZz{6CLN2ZN#os*UOIv^I;M31V!q4CThTr4w z|5fPt{cq@j@b&(A>wz8vWZrgRPjZ|-+TY6R&->`t?Zx>}CGaty2&G=#UYsA40e{uV zF%RQ-?zQ#=Z&=k|Z4c)YMZiZp2(3Mw-^Axe^2H%fem)0szEulxY{UMn;pbs1oX^$8 zeXa<(vf`I~;B%w#ceMYNrSrMb&;!x0ts0+!{y+%y1R&xZ=);cmINj@Q(hP-y$O0$(RKTAKHlouPweMa#A}{vwcT4!@G5xN{a55e2=jD^FI9AU(QD?fscL?vc34e z!Rl|%pr7**d#lke_OSnRK4k{{Rlwjkr}ISH&-s7MKiW-b+l$}BV$d6h-mKBj`7xXi znn1gD(XM5~zmrrnxHvyDhw-J1{@gVDhd6eR^P!V?zG&ip-Z%Vm`Z~Si38P^}+cay%MH-U$4nYLT{ zZ4LCOp_f5VjMKg7*8cq@2R>uxXx|H)$CU~E+&{$fw|w}=@^Wuy*P1@Za^7W^{(alU zMdz`!tNT9pk5RkweMAQQk|xrwd>>)yd>^6d)A=$hL3zGcu8->tG=ZDA1}dO;41W=L z-_UcwL)Gc_*YV@LPmZgM10n6K<9n@bpB(gRJGK5Y{#h#Zmh!{V5509uRR0#DJH^>7(~` zCZ41Bb(YTeb%q}3L9ex^4SMjq)9o&HHb9Sz(?{P)tbV@Fw)#_$&ni8--8nyab>A_h zUAV7?t+xrix?ZiH^MgC!V?GfwPncJn?^^(W8L$tC_8PtSvi78J^=U7skJ}(J%4}syUOzCC-C$9 z4a;Bk;n(rueB}oC7#BjeS7yHdeJS|;RqfaMIbS&fKI$c8Jefb7zgvPmZNNC>$xnIC zC+4_BIwASlzMS7|`O8K>+n4i?Gq58IzNX>dLMj?uoX=fF{|`g1Z}|Cq#rgVm-X|d! z{lVCHG8#AR{i_JRN&T1el`G(5TnNQxX)nfy^N$&yx{(up$>-LD@9^Qm&zpuGh}Tw) zkK8XJpr-&)Zy*RftLVCaaXxeb<+PiS@nQRNK6Jn2>>yv+=;!-s&WGkaf;QsVH2j<| z%lY4oXBGT?!#{lB8yLs+14ZP28toOmeLVkLm|tMxIohYt(u0%Ue?zbCFB1O>=&kX3 z14ZE7ak|I%NBX&Q*e_tGrS~>>`f{C68|37 zhnai`)O_sJao{}onVzHCY5)6R=trx@LF?zd_9*!1C!zJ1^V*xRy91bjJllo)`&)l2 z;M3m&wLP4-U7x`oj;oxf&VHSPTua#_`Z<4r>jc=Z3v8z!Pv?)e$HRN4HN7uzUUC-s z$T(&u=;u7|)wQqK!*P%E&UqgxL2qM%e$K1rdsx~-$o3`9dE_%amooo3kDSj%k)OCY zrU0p*?}a%Jp6%6x-37zHy$B92&inV!uVUb@8UBTieYDOY&2by!W5@762!5`sWP7Fg zzT~IV`7juhSDCk+Q03CUBWUlOqKn*isE082hT9h;@|J_Osk?^fQ8jW7CeCrNd#;1E zuQ(XL&B5Rg9rW&Wu<5z;#nT%(Si-rJ$;}+z-_ya?5qGzg=O{)mI=105_K>|k*o@SKC~%Ydu6 a$vNQh0LHU39L(P0;+1&L!K&hy5dVMkx0<>D literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..3683f85 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean @@ -0,0 +1,293 @@ +import CoreReader.Evidence + +namespace CoreReader.Choice +open CoreReader.Logic CoreReader.Evidence + +inductive StatusKind | name | convention | standing + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive MethodReason | output | explanation | applicability | simplicity | procedure + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Reason | status (kind : StatusKind) | method (kind : MethodReason) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- An implementation has observable behavior, a stated domain, an explanation formula and an execution trace. -/ +structure Implementation where + name : String + conventional : Bool + established : Bool + run : Nat → Nat + cost : Nat + domain : Nat → Prop + explanation : Nat → Nat + trace : Nat → List Nat + +/- An application selects relevant objectives and constraints; no universal ranking or score is prescribed. -/ +structure Requirements where + inputs : Nat → Prop + expected : Nat → Nat + budget : Nat + values : MethodReason → Prop + +/- These are explicit, content-based interpretations of possible method reasons in this application. -/ +def MethodContent (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : MethodReason → Prop + | .output => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.run x = req.expected x + | .explanation => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.explanation x = i.run x + | .applicability => ∀ x, req.inputs x → i.domain x + | .simplicity => i.cost ≤ req.budget + | .procedure => ∀ x, req.inputs x → (i.trace x).getLast? = some (i.run x) + +/- The extra choice commitment requires both selected relevance and actual reason content; pure status supplies neither. -/ +def Relevant (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Reason → Prop + | .status _ => False + | .method kind => req.values kind ∧ MethodContent req i kind + +def Feasible (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Prop := + (∀ x, req.inputs x → i.run x = req.expected x) ∧ i.cost ≤ req.budget + +/- In this application, a relevant reason is eligible only after its stated output and budget requirements hold. -/ +def JustifiedChoice (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Prop := + Feasible req i ∧ ∃ reason ∈ reasons, Relevant req i reason + +/- This proves the structural effect of the adopted choice commitment for each of its three status-only cases. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +-/ +theorem statusOnlyFails (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (k : StatusKind) : + ¬ JustifiedChoice req i [.status k] := by + rintro ⟨_, reason, hr, hv⟩ + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst reason + exact hv + +def identityImpl : Implementation where + name := "Existing identity implementation" + conventional := true + established := true + run n := n + cost := 1 + domain _ := True + explanation n := n + trace n := [n] + +def successorImpl : Implementation where + name := "Successor implementation" + conventional := false + established := false + run n := n + 1 + cost := 2 + domain _ := True + explanation n := n + 1 + trace n := [n, n + 1] + +def changedOutsideZero : Implementation := + { identityImpl with + name := "Changed outside zero" + conventional := false + established := false + run := fun n => if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1 + explanation := fun n => if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1 + trace := fun n => [if n = 0 then 0 else n + 1] } + +def identityRequirements : Requirements where + inputs _ := True + expected n := n + budget := 1 + values _ := True + +def objectiveReason : List Reason := [.method .output] + +theorem identityOutputReason : Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .output) := by + exact ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩ + +theorem identityFeasible : Feasible identityRequirements identityImpl := + ⟨fun _ _ => rfl, by decide⟩ + +theorem identityJustified : JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason := + ⟨identityFeasible, .method .output, by simp [objectiveReason], identityOutputReason⟩ + +/- A conventional existing implementation can be selected for an actual requirement, not for status alone. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +-/ +theorem conventionWithReason : + identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ identityImpl.established = true ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .convention, .method .output] := by + exact ⟨rfl, rfl, identityFeasible, .method .output, by simp, identityOutputReason⟩ + +inductive Candidate | identity | successor + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def implementation : Candidate → Implementation + | .identity => identityImpl + | .successor => successorImpl + +/- Feasibility is decided by the same stated behavior and resource requirement for either candidate. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem singleFeasible : + (∀ candidate, Feasible identityRequirements (implementation candidate) ↔ candidate = .identity) ∧ + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason := by + constructor + · intro candidate + cases candidate + · simp [Feasible, identityRequirements, implementation, identityImpl] + · simp [Feasible, identityRequirements, implementation, successorImpl] + · exact identityJustified + +/- The same observed input can conceal a relevant difference at another input. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem localNotGlobal : + (∀ x, x = 0 → identityImpl.run x = changedOutsideZero.run x) ∧ + identityImpl.run 1 ≠ changedOutsideZero.run 1 := by + constructor + · intro x hx; subst x; rfl + · decide + +/- This candidate is cheap enough but misses the required identity output. -/ +def cheapSuccessor : Implementation := { successorImpl with cost := 1 } + +theorem eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient : + Relevant identityRequirements cheapSuccessor (.method .simplicity) ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] := by + refine ⟨⟨trivial, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h.1.1 0 trivial + cases bad + +/- Each of the four internal-method reasons is eligible because of its actual selected requirement and content. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem internalReasons : + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .explanation) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .applicability) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .simplicity) ∧ + Relevant identityRequirements identityImpl (.method .procedure) ∧ + (Relevant identityRequirements cheapSuccessor (.method .simplicity) ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity]) := by + exact ⟨⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => trivial⟩, + ⟨trivial, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, ⟨trivial, fun _ _ => rfl⟩, eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient⟩ + +/- Openness about reasons does not make two actual behaviors identical or reject the existing implementation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent +organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1 sha256 db9b5f1803baab0e1b05a3a9e068948667412afa7d692e1da3869ca54be4b870 +-/ +theorem openNotEquivalent : + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason ∧ + identityImpl.run 0 ≠ successorImpl.run 0 := by + exact ⟨identityJustified, by decide⟩ + +/- A priority interpretation chooses one of the same two actual implementations. -/ +def priorityClaim : Claim Candidate := fun selected => selected = .identity + +def statusFacts : Theory Candidate := union + (singleton (fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true)) + (singleton (fun _ => identityImpl.established = true)) + +/- Both interpretations have exactly the same true conventional and established status facts. -/ +theorem statusFactsModel (selected : Candidate) : Models statusFacts selected := by + exact (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩ + +def priorityArticulation : Articulation Candidate := + ⟨["priority", "conventional use", "established status"], statusFacts, + [fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true, fun _ => identityImpl.established = true], + fun _ => True⟩ + +/- This procedure reports whether the actual status premises entail that very priority claim over its stated two-candidate scope. -/ +def AssessmentAccurate (report : Bool) : Prop := + report = true ↔ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim + +theorem statusDoesNotEntailPriority : ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim := by + intro h + have bad := h .successor (statusFactsModel .successor) + cases bad + +theorem statusAssessmentNonEntailment : + Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusFacts selected) ∧ + priorityClaim .identity ∧ ¬ priorityClaim .successor ∧ + ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .standing] := by + refine ⟨⟨by simp [priorityArticulation], by simp [priorityArticulation]⟩, + ⟨(by intro h; cases h), (fun h => False.elim (statusDoesNotEntailPriority h))⟩, + statusFactsModel, rfl, (by intro h; cases h), statusDoesNotEntailPriority, + statusOnlyFails _ _ _⟩ + +/- An assessment identifies the exact premises and priority question whose entailment it reports. -/ +structure PriorityAssessment where + premises : Theory Candidate + question : Claim Candidate + report : Bool +/- Accuracy concerns the actual reported entailment question, independently of a later choice policy. -/ +def PriorityAssessment.accurate (assessment : PriorityAssessment) : Prop := + assessment.report = true ↔ Entails assessment.premises assessment.question +/- Both policies receive this same correctly negative status-only priority audit. -/ +def statusPriorityAudit : PriorityAssessment := ⟨statusFacts, priorityClaim, false⟩ +/- Priority reasons are a policy component independent of the assessment's report and objects. -/ +structure ChoicePolicy where + selected : Candidate + priorityReasons : List Reason + assessment : PriorityAssessment +/- This is completion of the specified assessment procedure only, not full compliance with philosophical Grounds. -/ +def GeneralAssessmentFulfilled (policy : ChoicePolicy) : Prop := + Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ policy.assessment = statusPriorityAudit ∧ policy.assessment.accurate +/- The additional choice norm separately tests the reasons actually used to prioritize the selected implementation. -/ +def AdditionalChoiceNorm (policy : ChoicePolicy) : Prop := + JustifiedChoice identityRequirements (implementation policy.selected) policy.priorityReasons +/- This policy retains status alone as its priority reason despite receiving the correctly negative status audit. -/ +def statusPriorityPolicy : ChoicePolicy := ⟨.identity, [.status .standing], statusPriorityAudit⟩ +/- This policy selects the same implementation using its actual relevant output reason after the same audit. -/ +def outputPriorityPolicy : ChoicePolicy := ⟨.identity, objectiveReason, statusPriorityAudit⟩ +/- The shared negative result is mathematically accurate for its actual status premises and question. -/ +theorem statusPriorityAuditAccurate : statusPriorityAudit.accurate := by + constructor + · intro h; cases h + · intro h; exact False.elim (statusDoesNotEntailPriority h) +/- These independently variable policies share facts, selected implementation and completed audit, but differ on the extra choice norm. -/ +def PolicyIndependenceExample : Prop := + statusPriorityPolicy.selected = outputPriorityPolicy.selected ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment = outputPriorityPolicy.assessment ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.premises = statusFacts ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.question = priorityClaim ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.report = false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusPriorityPolicy.assessment.premises selected) ∧ + statusPriorityPolicy.priorityReasons ≠ outputPriorityPolicy.priorityReasons ∧ + GeneralAssessmentFulfilled statusPriorityPolicy ∧ GeneralAssessmentFulfilled outputPriorityPolicy ∧ + ¬ AdditionalChoiceNorm statusPriorityPolicy ∧ AdditionalChoiceNorm outputPriorityPolicy +/- Changing the actual priority reasons changes choice compliance while the accurate audit remains identical. -/ +theorem policyIndependenceExample : PolicyIndependenceExample := by + have articulated : Articulated priorityArticulation := + ⟨by simp [priorityArticulation], by simp [priorityArticulation]⟩ + refine ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,statusFactsModel,?_, + ⟨articulated,rfl,statusPriorityAuditAccurate⟩, + ⟨articulated,rfl,statusPriorityAuditAccurate⟩,?_,?_⟩ + · decide + · exact statusOnlyFails identityRequirements identityImpl .standing + · exact identityJustified + +/- A correctly articulated, completed negative assessment does not enforce the additional selection rule. +This is only independence from represented assessment procedures: keeping this unsupported priority would fail general support proportionality too. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice +organon.grounds.implementations#p1 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.grounds.implementations#p2 sha256 bb2a822a304d4a20f513218f356ddbeeca8ee139e3ed802213591e9ff6c5095c +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem generalGroundsNotChoice : + (Articulated priorityArticulation ∧ AssessmentAccurate false ∧ + (∀ selected, Models statusFacts selected) ∧ + priorityClaim .identity ∧ ¬ priorityClaim .successor ∧ + ¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice identityRequirements identityImpl [.status .standing]) ∧ + PolicyIndependenceExample := + ⟨statusAssessmentNonEntailment, policyIndependenceExample⟩ + +end CoreReader.Choice diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.olean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Choice.olean new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..d1bb050d557b64299718d30d093b44c2576287f9 GIT binary patch literal 582952 zcmb4s34BcF_x>cAEcUU-9#lmYu?MY=wV}nJh^-P45{)F1AZQtCNi7v>35ro#p_ZT} zt);1=K~<;{sugRarJ}W@miB+oeV=D?Gojz#|N4BK%=?^k-gC}--u2$O6B8948tv}Z zqH*))jhmXDeFZjc6WFxX@Mhrwq0NVnY!T2hbYzQ`q2VpVT8EBo)}l?*5rHFH4i67+ zWillkn?KfM%DeiuPDP`e$@I4;RFj(Vxm$E(0{%4lncUqpUi}Jzo|KU#cV=FwSyc*s zHBCt<7p1%kmlpuqUw@YX6KQdL?i3Rj-X}bCM0gyvm`uj{vr$i(3j=*e+&GmbT%xZS z*hzixxy$&-5#iBc;rOT%(dXl);^7Zk{o#w%r_>A07Y4CA80AKPw0iD)KoMyw?8yL4 zq@2blc6o!J)C-?GMZ`qXDx*Cakgx2o*>`kMbz%Q6JzA{dW1^K((US{#A9v;7h1w_I zf3ITBW9ni3q-^)N@UUJ`V-h_9khg)_8@P?FxTgGD)WdcoW&8C_2u&Cl|5{}92xXJ} zZ?r1~`W_CuIi_q4a|P<79i+^|=+H6Fwi7*>kk18e5clKA$zAi`pq`TQhjx+DzWB&V z;k`xuH1>6|FAaLKXy4A1>uXn6oJf82la&5O$8?H`9yu=F zX`CitjGv!b`EA|fyPoX=bP58|4Se9IWjuF&^%&? z9tY^x>-TNBcVp@*>Z=H6Nc90iD~n|d$0bCDjf*n$y29;|N54;QY`d>~cfH%XY5kb` zNU68O2rXl@P7)fWBG5A?u5dize~>rg*{@{%ov*G7H!dyGD6nbny3Xb&mJIin`g zLnfAevwwni)SwKBpPmsF9hB0s94~>W(&Ih^B^M0ENbNhBWv5R^*-jFgchmF+w zjP74yeU{=XP642o8t(l)Kj*fd4iYcQld>J+$AyK3$H&JQmT9_ujF%nyKFWG7q{oijyzyk@>k;DzJC^;2L86_@A#s&>Cy(hxl!Qg1BExh`^FdVEx$PrAKI|5zU> z>+RsIugLVI$Bp%-L4QZDVU|^;_I41xQZMs|>wwGqOS+wWcx@Z&wa6dZMauO`%<$3S zVF{7rWl_zAqUd9N{w0;49s7>o@YA2;M~M!JAKQnN?KC20OlYJ&`W4Q{MChp-G;Y+A zcPGC_J)EaVncv!aQ&{xN7}pHy$=Mq|$o;LU!th`A#D&Mk#2NC2?c-BQ`BisS%$qA!^^6i{jCw@IbIO&JbHPv zW7+G63NHS0d?4kx*e5(He0->}w<&v>hiS0)VE4IOEls+-@W1rQ_}ay=_Mv?oe@tbR z{|65|+4G9y(OKe*5Bt$`R|5L~+_JwOUa_D3m9(q~YM0E1eZpho{@1)7i+Vk?AJ{B4 zCTtK{(aZ6Gl=`Xnf9;zxq4)D$WddKnzTP=+a9$;4Khyd}oYXCsw5!RY;^7DS{n6<; z-^YKQF1Xmob|PiJ9}}7o7BNiiN<>c(t*A+rvCd zqaOS9-T!nO6d-zxdB}aJTW#ZG`i68P}j$P=37?9p-bsr z>pJGUoufXEo1`2+x$acMXS}fM`Zyj(K;QHB1fTLX{hZ?f^PiM)#kxfWRM)2Taov&* zeO=#}w7quUbJK;zO=}3o?f7@&oT;jm_fV7GL+T{}G zr*+ptagIg(UB5Z|S>DfyvqXo~&phOM^6;LoSN;(({UULWPn-uw-Lbs<;`BrMup#ms z-?;vmeQDH9cl-W9lxMqeeb{t&w`q-^9I+7(sDN<*`|Mw9551A&{=sR%#ec5RgA)fs82AE~7m@6_vk}?woz{cd6gU3oiONE|GHF3?GZZ4tfG19}HUm zOIy8bTbC}T9_BYG^L&hcZXjIB9_G0NddglJ_t*aMm9G=eL^<h@`hTt;BKN0$aOd$_GwtG0^&-stkInQFB+kISoLgdKE zLIaOcZ#MKM`Stv6$GdgbO4VXF^MjOm!g0J)RH*a7#HcTzvWi3I`VTj+=ukgI^a;-K zg8j|s$-M4aDa)PXJm(!!uFpc9>wVFrE~7pN>hu3`$LF2rr34Fy*w6MOWjh+q^WK;k ztD-IXIG*G|U()>I5q^WS9*I7|xgO?vCwKqN-tBtzakc};Q&Q$}Sg5u?!ilix;kXjw ztKt-NqFBlI7hF5WdN}T~|2Bw-DRp7#FK37|jvUt-v^ezs&)rypt-B>mydjVF6GmKbG^9v zn(viQ7F^g&JR3OIYkQXZEz4^9Q4;Zd;Eea_$=!POaNn?txNlYEKgX>jn_l1Bs@|o# z#F-bICn~*Jr`tzW*Er)740)alM9yCR^VN$136$qNLcDv9`Fe)?X?@M9#q62q2HLSr zSonx>ajxS9^Ee&#zBTXup#?K$>*JfmGne*YzdxtNh88vI#yIns<1VSE7^+>7(W48U zH|1cR;a^R~XHLYYxBr|NrZ20c9AmZs{;&rSE+Tyh^bFHvO05B4)s_P2O#pZ2u%9{X=F^mX6ev3F9Hp9fMO z#|=`pLu9metfQ9Ay1yJpQlV$A&+5mvgkWdhJM#|hJU6jxc*VL)8cRLm7w1v#@8;Hs znd`oFmL48s`*EE4^n8_;!>tQ0(@wSpKVZO`f-5=-iy=`xDPXIrHJuUx(lS_>JOwh%;ZfPI&R{cC|A% zPrXi@{hIi9$$t)VOR>E|obh+y{4mOMc#ZJUt5O9Qe;5x^&THY?!hLvDWPF5SMmEMf zwx)_t)cCCv%I79H{c+ZZbNS7c`e#KXN9*H^)W>;_l=Ge1C-jPrn%FfoGOA$T#r~9o z`fe|MXX5Y{6T8!X&cCG0Z|#1>nAl-W3l?{pfY@)TrR)v>eSL6!_rER|vx`1sdoka( z_*PqX{?dS5f{XpEhm`dt#B?fjmP~!jCkN`g^_?x}W;uJ2^*!h7Qe$dQdbjWR2b5<# zIX)dPb>-%JSN#vt91~NqF>@C;~LiOfnlW&gQ5-BWF4{@#|<~KRff85_UFA!({pnpB1Fa9w3#OJxL zxC8mLEq~9VTW8JAeB<~{{U>Jp_Q&L(Z2IzE{9yZ#a@@myvbog5OYG&k##UR!rPq6{ z#^(6Gs}FO={9u2&z5Ve4&%q}?5FJt<*UzN-z@cI4PTT)|9i74YKl$vz`Qx^1(J%D} zn^y|uRE^&P0I6EZC(@>{nGu!ylAbX{Jgz$@Sfr2cApW3|3loG zDNX8sW89Lc&tvYXTfMCMd9E>T+y`3{KI^l)>Ro*t65J2>aRM+8*!*W*d-b_(4QWqJ zR7hF_pH-e09OL$kiSDA^q>qd;9QBKS=DTlQ9>&gW*XYf^ zE>00#;=%nfDf=7O0loD58HPi5=w-brs5kaptu^t3>pAy%ynjo-lh+P8l$yR~iPS50 z`Qttx+uO3K-cSE@nHw*-*u{B`l;e28d2wiz@X96n*k1ykQ*j7r_I2bh)hg=CGr`$k z+249!y;1qAF#C9s|F1X{9&es~U)h0r$J+gSFP^ddCECUKa~^N{&htA4g}kGztfoX0K5d#(e<{&HopZT+TS zMPBUTJW0y^t~_4wU(coZKCk>gbLXq0C%sSV;-Zh^IVr~r?L5TUx5e%t$VY&Vec`?A z?zY-T>6bHKu)Zk!L(5l}rcTnsWsEb&=Vl`+?%4Iwjz8!Z`xB{azxrR#q2$4?$z{9z z5q|I82-@XeU-`{=FUlMD&B4}H9uueCS%~|N{Fl;Z9c+4tcmVECuwS0aY58`1(#xU5 znLnJ@Po?~`COx{nJ}gOmnKz`&pLp%IP=agx!li?{|9ooEP^CkKj4D zU*xoB=GrUPztf%PugnWl=0{XaSZI{CU3fJrW;jOz(Z_rZ^jC2@b?E2xu>K33^Cr({ zNV#59{k&^vSVDY{m=WR5v4wV0Z<15*z_-_}U$vSz*Q*?7%eC$M$J|%y4I|FDay@aX zXQz#yy?ymKao&&Oe(ukh9cz=HoAe@at|us8J}~m)mhj)k5@)+}eb@KJ8D}G6UvSQ^ zYu0{lmpap^Sz6C7f=gboeMs3(VG-e> zv3(2QWH+``P6O3WJGa-l|G}59M6*7Qo7}JbwS8Ub5_4}QcrB}WqQQad&VI)6gZ=QY$yLtv zxPPS{<$12ab;#+o#OHqg^3g`(JSQcdFt(Qa2UP;E5$F1t^F{@)`1rFg4h_t z)jvLT?1tluhzH^R3+-R>Z^>g9e!jU*aA_}&OQam13g*`VkqHscp7)a*s&-ql?bqbp z35VQSZz}HZ@w{jCh@eg*qr#kcF64OL^ZD7HVc&NM{F?G?SGN0)m2VXLDB$lq#MzJ7 zu9Y6U&--oJull}H{PGk=?IPv)9~M*i`7P#0#EZ(0{^7TF9ErZyS7ar>ob@0-`hV_m zBlTX#9Kod?j(?;a2gi=nc9@0kW-EOhAF@#2t}%Tk?8&sWjM^)#ukRHR)l_iLVZ z+g7)iiM_I~XTN|&t=KTztB`q^(u*?)Pz#Fz=j{_B9= zR+|pAsT_3v3(+Sy$0M#omUf@+J*Dx)Ev%2@E-CAEo|ix49LUmG`M1j}<94x(68iWi z_E#6h+C^GTeZ+pTb4<9LEvXeWH;>>@_A-7U(0_l^!unxvx4$Gz#(d!T-a5N}$HQ>{xAD>>Iub}v=V^V#a&H*Y7@%zU19mk@;_CX^O4}wg{D zS(pT;Kg@&lzE!QI*S>yBaH)^uDJjQQ^;{TJ@7eo^T-2L><;mK=`&@Cxf#W^*=M(+P z3wJYYM1G1!#s z_qXqBqF>@#PX5p?Qs!xlcKc3xw)Rx__|T|AkHHmcPir&Po^6w71{d$SXRYWm`kjUR zT4CA$_mXBeW)Kg;c>%g3bReDvIrgiE>wRXtP-^);;yeeXU+0f!{L<-K z>RZIqaDScpANHSdeaiX;L4vz!e)Alfl;>8Ov)W7}T*?oQFM-XKpAV0oo3Oe?uU5o) z9?kZz`pU>X4NfgwK%DX%uiFLguky>2Zik6;d}99nw0`H1@0wKZQUpi-RD1Jo!sgN& z8WDH4FYf=g8{`PB-~9U!;=C`y{2JWzmGPyfmJ?eU=ZFEo3FYWN0{GnZ>`VA=U zv-aHjDA_l6D|CNa%gDatMvl~;k2hwd)WdluqlIdxw?kVkd+xQcG|?^fnB@=cBIP+( z+&Fz{tYf;p$UFa*&@=tv-7PCVdO;WjXM3|ftN+xe(ZEvO^!_9`*Ed{ez0~g3gtqN| z*M~>Jxqf84_f9z5@cyYswW*)uAm^*0eQv)ITW8yC;>;)ZiyF&rZT)gqFFl{c&+@{k zU8L;SVG*IxqryjM$4>Fu)H5hNE=KXm|6&*8XKAJU9=bDde2Llg6T&Q(rdp zwa*!!_1b4qk-{T5?Pt5KUK~66^q4=wiF2GL{$|> zh!R}v<+_fvlmObLo`=!CYm-orvBr2OwN~+N9~W@pY{1RmL`L+Lkw3JHlzQW}dqz>= zg;xzmec8}g^U8;Hp1*O=xld(YavqtoXK=*WNx?^?4v}~653r6|z3f8vNA2R96HmkV z!g1u6cGl{3EI;eZYLVwUnB(og{@eQamObWNXR+Tfe=b(~y?VnB_x>&VHGl6vkw3JH zG!b@$pg)@MJdzDG7c>apX9>Xgm<7snP&>{;tvoNrzQYch2^s?b=%+89vrY!h1@+;1 zI;aCQ7c`)hYR_a)?ss`kV8c04ENC)l4rl=Od7Src_{{xZGM%W`X8`T5w-10yGUYi=W{)_bquS4?-STa33fD)DG$Z zHQ{~>?`!(ua|CEQXf|j*XmDMX*Ze+CB0gt<=7CypULOK#2h9fMdO07TgK*9r0h$e( z51RbEsy7Xk>+vjn4#N3o1ZWayDri2aFU}VuKr=vdKurx)J$|58&=62ND4&ma;ByA3 zG!xY4MP-LSXb@;JXd0*q z`v#u3+3}gaN5d^Ta->IZ5C4FR=-IzWA}KIOW_hR?B}T<;{~Gw&y*;d2&f9%vBO zO%b5!pgygYe>`9G$LAo>2+(v;pFqX$4;lm-0h$Dw3MzBHtatQ-Ozm${txUhhfeMjz z2Fo+8uxrPIJ0o8huvKth4bMY4`J`O?`Kdt!E>!H1NI@e{i zkCgQ!C>2HY#6r*Hs}189O&Q!0^_bail<#*wJeVr9_Y0WmM}^48D_ECS?vV|Bn`5_} zGGUP&VDj)zL3ui89%%Na@hjZ87)J%hIP$srcZOycxlE?j2PPtEjpFms(kxyT9CmKx<) z{_uyp75Jq#%^uHe*pUyKQnTuAHypYNo`G^pCuMKnsio_?qh5)l9k>HD0DOIVMfrR9 z(E>${{`0x*X4Ss?Jz{QnvT$g)nd>;(`>XZXerl2TNbvljaj(Bynyd;DInI-mtA1pk zer6;b;zu^@qMs*w@3a;2lQ`(%#N&(Its-sG!ffypxNm0_k3L)Pd3qooid)r}0Y1jB zYme7r+^mX2*9SZhdLlqKo9Fa4yXX`CK*ZMuxg_xK@!1gV>BpK2^thYtChj*Zkn`=L;vu+>?mjawtjzmwp);BRqqkuImF19noiRU(Jzs6P!9C>=IgBPkki{A&V|ApVRy#m31Z)nriUjF1%RQO%n zD+2tt>TS8=?OT-JwY^fn-}_YEOFlk@+e_Mm?PY9_0PS=q2!3Zmp7G7cXCuGG~Hdua_n_JB&?aP#osv(*&x55UU+`7`(Nqb)6x316aTF2wn0obu{#C)Mmscp z=0udIfnHs7`U6Hu?Be)KO8c~LrIW3YUAfS+^5=^YZA*RU9FHwQ%3s#sqJ9m14=+k2 zuQDMQ0KP-Zi>H!TqtBd2`|9scQKlH<6AL{Z_TO#v@xhm!=Tsc`NO}IMUUO2QCk689 zpv#U2{oN+0!l$s;oP%=4?VX-$rzvUWkExsTm*e^0J&*OHKN5HDmspllw;7LaOcD=2 z$Xh|*KfLrhb3&K*C>+nmJ3BNp)*k{nJLtC!zNyK!6a6;W?*P8L=?ngBW6h>#K3CaG z-ba9nG(FCI%YmNRcRq>wEBouah?AR7cV#D^b8wGpTW3VmX8QS%Buh<{La`;hf=AT2TL+fAK$Xak|{i2uy{Noxv)(f0ZG9gEMXSb_)nD#1eiHp_} z=ECip>rx-jaTu4hJK^mqZ=ApWZ}qu*2KG?(1%v+CX;wAnue1|w%yn0MZ`}WFdg$@w zK2oQKJ$qbDh;x2Rz^Eq^^>|GW^l1<=tD)$TIOd_8^<}-X`hZ|^8Rhvr=Z&MUM2?+u zZ@A!M2XmB^ZQU^@rcmBdzpbb8=i!Tov(vx%b_eP)C!(BuWqofH7fddr9sFLvlX>L^ zjQets{`D0j&igR80;2ox_|B}4XJRK~OUimeRTV|*$%j1;Y+)0-*FNSvw`ZRvrM_X- z0!3nvUoYjS6|`BIk2=0T^`C!*OYEU@q`VI@j9;)UP-hZ-5zvza`tbb4J>_$v_4`Po zkMSpEI}D4MsNa(ib)qL7^4XwWzbyX!lNT$@1@3OLDZ4eD`gP)T%b>$o-1Miw>wUYM*EY2XMwJsdG0aWU(Qo_ztldaS!I)5Ns3*0;J5Ts z_0G6o_m+nNj|J{eeB@%QmjSl{4+7q<*{a^&2AqDU!0)ARz4iuu5WhJe((i5FGfexo zeEEx5sNv>R=%viMZ@gT{66sQ zC+9p2cm!}i;A#l1#+y{4!QhAkNRR9&j8H?U+I5RuarW2DsFwf?3K^?6Eqk6Z(ptdPw5bH z7U)j~UnZz;u!_T-A2P<3u@&Wy1s~%d1pe|Z7Ob#Xi}GiqUsxfR2>zUYYx ze)gwS@W1r^_A2H4it-1z@MnYHw_f1!@|L3fsaPj-obnl{{2f^3X!{C<*`@tGlfWMc zKEL?+Z}3?}!6Q)4^SDFbof%vS^-BA>?q8C?U$t|++xnu{P^ZkRuKO2(<$TK*cBDd{ zb6Yk(Ge3o2&bRVVE}u2*nd@f#fk9!?F3lfje+U?);_^w<-mT+eql1VCqnzvEv;F}; zR($T~--ssy=ld0YcdU7QYi8q1#8ZIt{R$Ng47U2`vR_jKTmc1+Ocwu_G%{_*j) z96;2OghcOa;${Tn5g6 z?_B%spu3-{L~x&>%1`!Bzm4;L^Z+jH$aqqxNNRFs=kpbiZ{PgpHO5=?hM=6|`in=J zhx2@2a656F!&iT6`I8UyVEmeX=0N2i{}+Bc_!*}h z@E_}3zqqHr-nL}d&s73l_$_a$I1Q=uOB*lWqWl@iyL?b9_;=RayYOlERrtJ?9sIH2 z7b7G;I5d-T{bqQdO_%6#V|1Ifcsj?W4CuMr{@ktbb^G+Q8)-+LuLr?z5j2)thAID~ zTyJ0K@kjX&*>R7I?Q2Cjl@{LLsXmsL8mXe`kT2x-ZL2G%=?UC)lYf`DGgG8B5~xs^_2$eybO2>apZk? zySI9I8}M}C?5~|)dLh{dxXh=n{URIun>ti~SgdHj@N(@J`QT5_p1Q2Ke~~=*a_txX zp(-AqKk)dfMA3fX<=QWT!N0)swxgs^Vf~Vi>=%r`L{8>+2l6oq@|@q(@!7~P^LrM` zMP9?6xv$sW+cHvk%qzWyr)=+BA@F5^rf%32=@jbI&B*cviH`L?Yr~8L1e=FTP zP(8iaSiA6uoi>!S?vN|5>@vuE`T&mw4QexSi8Hq}JCk5vGVlv=QycMoMeJldkg`2q zj~NvihKe*hoWDN=)>iwXLDUeTisIr>G)^|AV@Uc8Qpo_xsrj#U0mSeE$7 z^%<3}34{1+MLGR_y-h%hE)1N{_Yt4@Lw1e<_Y8r&9rV&Kr%sbs^z->LmbIJS?>VD< z2ISc8hd%AmioBY_&nI<)!EHmo&8>RfF{v)*qjwi3^HvzYT z9$CKb6JvX(A$}piJw}f`$u`sEo%iSXeU68D>D!v!Th&`^knxFi@jjH4i`@?B%K+Wq z?T2W=kdzz0^B_tcr_`|uALVihiBA1_N)9Y_Hn<>{pp(r z&Tg7AZRQ5zzLACfYy4|X|BJ! zO!-9M^zYMt56qL&{u~cE4!vQWe!;TU3utN`9SB{6`M+WWer0o4_*_YQntxAL7 z9B(r^D!jz#nTz=Rn&3H*H@&6s8z)=d_cF-)p`39@v4!mQ25#JcS;5DC{_TeD_kF;p ztWoPCu1f<^ZwTbpfB&#Yu>f)^D(l#6<_Tyr_@6wi*1ou3QT}}7J^OtI_`lqC@n{LO zKc&QfU-0LF@A;_i;Ux`u;uodj!aNCY{v^GW0k;BYo^`(Zw!L%#?nZyv&$iFZt9PRH zN`0-U)$eA9Jjapw)@k|8H(B)~Ho+ah+0Vw5zP>ZE*@4>PgND0j0B1j|921=!v+_s% znI)0Wp?x^tsXp_=@pJZkvKI1grZLJtp6}#(HoclPZ%lRS_XA!_3bd>2qq{dAy!|)( zv9q6W96kNvlutSSYq|f-`MPUpRD8HnDSkNni5>M_nUuD@*|rpYY!o~d<@|nC^SD;c z{6B2pL{w!YXxZ zewuA4=X`y(>MxfClS|?d3!HIUzv%XI%^v;IaOe7x-}k+pF=J@#zn$&EAo|lFPnlCA z*0Gs%{mH;ijG^hc7M#Rz2|9X zFv@A??)UPYN5~Qf3-CnH$z5am8OQY$lyh8(TlLx`&w_EqGav1m4!*Z0Eosd0P{vIw z+CKy|8+`Y(DlU22I2gil0(|F3H7{PqP+tVetW09r9j?| z^BkYU`t0bHM&DhW+JNy&qI`FyC)&-IDXF(>Dsaw&8?N^BFvcqrIOElL*R1Wvctrru z1--NF`dejTpTvvfH1+$$DLX>_b0#V`_65o0r$*+e#WWJjvfPzak2#|yK=zyN`(bKxTD=Q`<&k|5S`k6gJOOO zivN7-_QS?{OehZkZLxcY#ju`q&R^-CO1{tVt_}LUy?>$T(Avw)?_bf6f%}tq%S3SJ z_b!s4|J1a{QEmas0*PA$%2Pr4{ehQ;SE<17XV6~ZXFdmkKNEDj-MfO>kDLYiUE3ue z{1x8p7stG!l<4R4=*fty|2XBhJ@K;?FKtszKSf5)YxwodzHT<_-r=XyRZ>f3r|67B0g&E25)U>TRPI~2|vk=EqQ8Q{+W?OA$Rt}&mOM@fiN>ECbqyIDnAwNpOi zd=r)aiWz4P81pF*n$A zthJ@{l5^uE^fUj7DsF7wV0;}G9}z_Pr;^}DftzBlUlxl=1b8n0c&`U55@zi8h}?bDpml=^MJ zS^wW_r*&mr8hz${Z|5MR;^6E*$?zN0|tGrv1V% z`Cv!6e3p1|k|fnPgc{c28NXx7-<{5Yo<7Hu7QB04{(!Iw}7YZIt}sdox%T0Dj23Q9tvi+=;Uf&U|uq1M80kKjk}>tgN>w>rZy6f6|3b z!^o@AXUyyYD0v6X+Jlj|B^61>O|T#82Y3@)>%pTyk@O>2dtD!{|Q8S3h{f9 zpEDoD|FXiUU8MR%pnWcQe`IKs-#F*dg3c@TXSvkxGe!9~f9inubSCXTWBtCs%@q#E z8SCd7pOkw8!~6aH)H~j&Rpqq}`lM9%AD_={UH#PhQ-C+0{`y2?{oF&4vOh&fMmZ}i z)c(*jXz8r63!mTeNSHL-oR4z0e^~WtL#aUG;5)T&`)|IP;k<7tcpBsb!PoJf#v!yt z@BrY!z&%T4b)(I?JlZ1>c(ncI5lTU~cz&Syx0%4*P1BTLmooQ$E@g9H?{YTyZu0w-_XEyz`n)Ck6IV}u ztmlfGl1dpl!1L&c+K#Zm8$FSTbq+Ql4% za`LU%bN2wM)Yd^BUMAp-YXm+|++BPTWymjn<-ngL@QwJj>^{!5+MK7|xGlJ3{pGqY z5meS+HjJa`(31_C3u>%e=1J2`<)6rF*faNg>UZpfOV4}fdesW~j*~9!Y3hAlf9_24 z-#Y^3To?2EOSg_3@i5w;^m&;0UNT}y2D`NQn5~VKoy5mhX);hZM%iQL`(udLud>>1 zz&*2}FCTQ#z9&}lihjQLhh-za{WskpZ|3{3i2t>_!F2=f89Ynb$MtvjN;B$l{VnYq z2s{yV;Hf67c`hZmFUnIuLqG3U&2Zji=6lRo|HG^A-!#^r4LR07`_*rMHrAg`9Q5|Q z<*8;YrX*io+sk*h@~3RQ*H^HAvp&g3_Bkn&d~|I;DVKaqN4x`}F9I|Xl>P|6tCr>gRb;CiL$=^w(*g8%h65MR_hL&kv{G+25PzNAyJadESr&exLW0UD4kk zsAu*gr=r5o^9Hs{Ao$B}J=gBP&JVNDz7gQ>Ic;s|)6Nh1enOrfrhs28kofSufIL53 z`Rjzq#`B(B@blcKNA7!%jpv6xbCiEg)`s8opxm_yj@1pE1d+*}+#&f$M;F+LX0w;{&xt-{z z-^`CX^#{J-W>xJcIM2I$<|_UDT6f4To zyifFQ@?Ym&%)cbopV8?0f1P(R|I)#q+UD@-|2pqt{^f%I&aCj(Pdo2o{;~f_&$>_?UNh!*dc#wzCH6iYq&7rl6n}25a?@C>F$lo8}B&x8A&MTKBww$ zL(ezZTylh{5cyQvX;SvC_+V}y@AIkCh-U(4oV?E5y+1bOvHtyYP2N2hIOEi@U9qHq zcGX5w-sgR#mvOqa$)nHG)XR&B`vYg3w*1ig{N;AXxsP!V0?vKT3mdv;qvf%z@FbR6iOnW@!4|6M-`yvOlg`)~omc{T*gfe+qEs+!>K&Woxx8K*tGbJ0Jt(B9eLzqKwY$J39TiVA-O z_?gE(i?X>39;TD2Hf`pRnC4m>|Wy* zX5d;q&wPGb-hVhOe5_uPR*$ov1w-Gr`v*7l?0io5MQ}UH+0QP2I(l~AOO^mpAh-iK z`&qderE8pOJFNrp4B+f%zf_t(^_53+sNX#Yc&XYQ-9=`_!fPFZN)Ee0dDCL}IY`l# zvmg8u@lMM3#QlJC+#mO^rT*P5limjIZUsI@3yNH}9Mi_W)%FjQza`GG$Tzk_lctvk zx?2TRxE=EBXFnw#3-++;urAMXXFKe=6Ulz4<*8Q)!lx-0Dc4s0)_P1P5Oc;tZZ z)ZWbDo~Tdsx%Ml|5*3#pW4mAW(p!bv^nT^#+OGn@zrIV&bZ@@`UinM(yY{OP@PD=a z(GNbBqWrG?DjEE>w{`oC=OL8R?@PM$E5W3{r7+(ip9d6ntO!&;FL_4Z`k-#2xq3@eI^Hy?A zZsd1;-$WAlfByd4$FBWb^t--qA|3pL4%`{g1_6cm*braEdzf# z`1#zf?@A>+T5`-g)G0!1I7}+^yN~b~hj3T00bZkBViLibI1PjlGJ+nhIUQ@0!;E z;2-8TbWHJ(LhO2fcFpS$@OPg+Z9@sfiBh89HLsJwzq0h#vr1aYsi^R~=5+@6x1AjP zcBz1({H}SO2mTpfG_scVE6VSh*M6&2e12Y8*~aIkDJAx}=Cuv{Wx8$s!$L+-8LwRP zS|Ay(vXQTL$a9QI!)NBX@XL6WiE{ZY{l#^@5$`nkTs|Gzw(s( zAkKXlpG&%U=0Tt7hbM1Q_7&{Y`1?=~N_9T9^J*9Uc@fQqXWj>VBO*K|ZlY+>fuPMM$l$pGNySd`PRa*bm3Gcw?w$-tSP|ITXMoV;3GoPO~4Os8Imcq_it z$GurUd3{Q$`pZ2D&pN+vbr$RA?{|>TTJF`t-^=(&$#LJ6F{osrbB_Sx7+1v(-Nq=z00sdaJ*{8T+9F_WgpvSUK)o%q| zx#*oZ9~XU3%i9p}KR;>g1FoNGfbjFV)NJH=GWpjnU+#KNFa49hN5%U@8Q>S4(y#bC zRJ>1g@b_AsjQ5Ew>kGI4;v=tQxZ!zRiAMl%w(rIh(QDidxQ+6NS9ZIyJ3WAF{&=~@ zE0+4MJeu)e_chqhlfhpy_{kstbzg(=$^ifAX_=Q?<0a!2PVvtsRuOSs>bc6W?a<$RtjFXq}KcQIbO#6JFB z7wtQd+3Hh;>bPeR^hSUVdCucyXG}Hy{wPlZz4BtmpLyR@^2T*sNCjVqzRfqfuJ5H? zUE?XXNV}%O&rHbkd60a3rv1V%?P}Se{8sV>^A7i8|7(Be`kb=Opikn)-z($u)OSPr zBuia#iQl}h{C}%YYbWT>09`y`-cCb1Ip>ey>dLR}BVWCJ`Q?+mPvpcS$|`)x#(Euk zU8<{pjb8G=-dmOP-29z8kA7v$G~6lgsI2%tSXd*c^Y6Duh(99F^%3W{5C8q%c&=gQ z?@>`_^$CAD<010NsY-7eXsHKPFB|;x%tATG?XtzHerue6_#V$Z@OdmZ&*D5G`uSc- z%SKgCNAvL{Z;baw`)!av_*K{zL;cR@j`<$Xo244A$^Sge0sqah(93h}PX?CUEtp)o zf4~{vmB04p&WfMofTSrMN`83F9ftqRz-fXbX(}waq&~vX`b3Vr|^;s{&kLPPB|~o-=*m|r_cZ#Kg>sIAi^kN=F^+Sw!1F*mb-q!oIP91H7K?VJeU?vE zJf4(T{&xw)f$D2jYu9OhkKV{{0YCFU1pL;2I>eMBBdEkH5B)e9e6=cU zdZJFVRC{Njoc@m7`_60Jhdpil$N~RW_m}QiTT^ILF9B}YESOW_620WdOQ@es|l4 z#=P*Is_LiyKd*%kHOl8g&S#6_Yc%v-=kGO0TwLuJyCp73kn@Ke&(VVLnRN)i#3cmf zO1|JdS^OOVzF*a|UVsPf7hbs}j{H4Q>U9|O$$PT+I|=&35Sk40;;W6rR=c6WB`^4% zEY_O`J=Tl6>blk|{=3#I_K5#kkn`PII4^?mnRW`l?mx=qv$QMEdAJ`qQ>?>SvsF-i z{wuN{a6mqI%9M4U=(mbn@w@H^GQhul-kiH$e&keCi$jt9KpyySd{%Y?&*Ld2{3#uf zM_7+%;675V&v!p^e~Nytcm1|0IU8u;RG(Wsk2mUfUGLk$|Jpa+b&F{SjmCKD>&B8w zFW38N;1`|JZm#=iDVMnO`8SU9SI(bW>uwcP;l61~FY{+b?q_{HtU9c zzwx#k$|Voke>qQazZ|}{#a!y9yx8yh{_&X9K1Gc6>JaAmc^~%0*uM;qNDt&-i?_R`$&2eL6(zOHomy z=_y#R=0kte3#UJvbf)!e;AX#_%0JdKp;nUqjtjx19)2H>l;f`R`+4Do>*M$HLZJ84 zO1;Y6ym;sq>q~a2@9~tXhXs>M`fVC;t{=946KniE9<%Fn@ZO1T`ZMU1&w_j&=-U-L z7ka-lUOsh_|9#rA*l_75*HHX3f`?=-V){;qlY-h%bVLND{H4R|u>feU{vH11>5P|o+U`H$RR*0{c-{aN7iyT5RUaUYu)ru?G*%kQRjFzU~P zoaJ-HcYRpP5bi_8z5w6>!0UV0`-kI^jEk<%joZLCecSktICe-Z>KeoA_F+T6?o38w3oV=0-A2mMj%=au%erHZfcjG=gnDSkep5jU7hFlj&`~!g} zf^Mufed5!e*Jk_pFM0ccn^i?bskkO_JAzkGZ)^2<14`BM2Uk=L+izPBQwzG@r!Uuz#{|Fc0pF<{l6%F*@p z@96xO9y~gyD>Ldzfu1kz!6$o989WH}IOikoV|GkC>3rXSf{Y~6l6jCm^KL3{L*_fPQtq2z}j zaE^n0x(xZ+c)!Dnc=5j0&PT~1Zo$fMkq@DKCsj|ExP!mB8*n>t=HL2RZrwb9YwhFZ z+MW*Z_xtTgk~yewdrEy))(5)tR;P!Can&49yKp}LdwTsoV?1at?V0n{H}4wl4cM>b ziBE_<(8g#l=QYOD2L9r=2aJ50y%ylHpq^1%obTHae;g=h{3Ex0_Zr7($se9okZNW6 z^%kfQO^}oKka#5|F2XW*6zAK`A+Ribx@CU zJmPyJmR;VspEijw`W9%K3&!*h1AeA+4T;l!Ix}`nQyjB?J91}6H;fsB*sRCMu#Ru#uONB zv^N=g|83MF#9#bFvC1w9jhzkvKc3i!77yqH};-XC7tFwc?6c(|cdBfk)nw8P+ zW3G_|5BR3A{}=r0xS8!DjrMfGqd)y9($lWP+BuP%slNKtbZ6g>*(R%-{z>Lx3*=%! zlR;}(U$uAzC_ad4`$2780Q&>cj;Y{J__R-JZ@;4a7VyV{W`lpoZ?_lvSc>x7p*I86 z=b-ZYvxmjJifMirFR>>Z{fYJjf`4JBE#->m8M)OtZ8G?+pb_Ao+0t`UiJYSRCKvt` z@Sh4z$|#vtl;4K&E)6sj{9P`V*i-ElGO*1 z^FO5G5(JuaaO^C11I~Fe1o)^6tsZ$8aK2ZR{ofR5YiI2LcE~wEUp-yq?&Mqx%8g+udyi@*&g@dhg3CH@yw=w2${iK6`cjCZl~BkmLHh@sxj$cvuVc zJAmha&K%pw-^Zw*@*S0(o(=yhZrsP3zE$OZpeLT>coj3s!#|D}qjJ8vY8)>@Ajkd3 zA1{_}&hr4tA1iP>=pP?N{8=3OW&P)a{LM%HI>1+Eg6G208Ol%oFZ{00WoLkY<@@Ug zmPsS0qQdX`{AwQfGivp1WpNbccYS`Ep+(%ffC-iGJ7TS8d?mcXwc|a&~em zD*Ud`uiC-C^SQOd%f}YwcYS^}4g4K0H!M{lq$t1Z^Q$@FAGZE#$%?k3{I1WhT8=1x zQ|eURSjk$LU)nPR>q{&6dd7^sTscVb37&^_c`WcPA+L|}HQ>o8XTH4n^#$)L20RTo z$Ca-SU0+`nxWvzOznBI7sO{?ySHp8yv|9LG_ZNBKAAIii>(%`W?=OVkb$#!5RK?@a z)%vY!_!i~o?;df#Xaj$@yxEIu`V{7ueH{0T9DBu9Ik&K5|7M3g`&b%28~OF~Pn3(i zhCO?qsjcrhCu{BFTp#%yQ+{=Q`IlE;n^#dk))zfouaNSdy>b2hG<`Pc8nJB7MI!y z?|;Qh*0)q-v?uU86|WODO(B(Y2W+Drt%>!E)El4G`c!E$>ajyl+ngDW{5MzW&&G;9 zj1Q?ZP6g{mnpG%Hnb23gU5g2A5%>L1jviI+jHJmhYA z?e1!F6v!omKMnM!wAPv4kdwG&qMYlnlRZ0Z@G;;#2h0Uuai7R*T*r#M&k5x}zwfcR za+NoV8|bC=aO%5xt}`Oz;wZe_%CT;w+|D%rVBOc-+@790oXU6)upQ3#Adx367+~FeM=l-NOJz>A}hvsM(kI+krCWq>O z+C1glPh~(p2eiz|$*sMT6(2+k?WauO%LnyXTQ0%dUX-8vDLeT5PpUYL>NC8!Pi#?s z?x(Ea4+ekWl}%lWg%suIev0-afj{Fn%lzWDqWs)XWuU#&!Qb-X;dUjgMftg(B7ZLU z%bw^lt7Je?e(tC2(C>Rn`8#oL%aW!13iC_5)I)G5FT9m!f<9>%u4jWFp9s1uePVEF z7d^ty^^8C2O$L9D(r31mu@tUX_^lYvxE{{{f4Hfp_Omq{ft7K>pO5*0`=31U-?@|j zb6IU%Hr62gso>{+#P0_chdIw5$SRjpls^Rgd`{Q~{++ik{#ITahh6piy4Yg}|1SqV z?o%P7D1R2_Z$AH#27b@Scb>1Pjk~V;?JoQ|;4kjgV0tA-QT_n%b6;#Zt^5tId-r7J zv}r_{2g;Y4)=3eZ|l#|lve)n{!AYDP1>d9&NJ`#MHW2PV$$Y8 z=epT?M(MlQbAG>O|7Q0UJsNI~KsoQD9eJ)+b>n@9B;Xtm>RfQtbqiG4EAreIP(FNC zi4jKmOc(h-{NGNXyo^V6#SrZp>Y4ky$rM1LwMJc)eHFc^YsBaIVj8y>tDdmjTZJ&UM(X zOBG(>`Jb#$a)5KamEG6JtXdU;CA3VzZ&pG@Ec|W?f}m7r>S4%cl0#i8NhkIwDDfG zrd|d-2RP4%zWx5g(cT8!bWZur`%8UC-E8S&!2KZa2fp7tH+3v-h>w->U6h^yy{A?$ zVZcLxbH6?%bW&zX1D=Zb+rjtCKi};u1zekNoaaBBFCF09e0X);(*7!sO}K>Lb-v61 z|L_&|_GNsF^1IHLdEl>kyh>e*Pm%f3%XPl=JFomc5kGTD+595ok(cXyX#@YK7gwDt zms^zIb-uKNKg2XTxO{d|e%JXj4g9$iCVf*Ovnapoe3=9O9>u3vE2bCacbzXSKPi8k zt?u|!rPQMQuJff8{1ao|nOHfcD8K7`84LbKgC0)sO)ARoI$t`#Z@N7>yGmkFe%JXj z3;gx3|GunhL{Wa%`OwFmke)nZzr)vZj z<#(Mglfhr9#_Xh;{zds+=gSQ6Tc=blUdy*Azw3ON2maKxwQsu4m-_R0m@kbzNzSMI z(2xCoR`KHblntMa{Bk}OfpY1(8urZRRpSf~#AxHKbDm9w{IczLd?wH7u$FpwHcrZV zBQZt@G3v>Kp3-N{%R|a-(2uobo$F^)ex!F$G!37J1gBi2PO21s-(M6T@B0Vh^MMWR zI?@&+e-`Qu9sp( zqBY|5s-jDOFTGJ@z z?@jC5dh2@+&2{I|pKQqUy=j%RR<52_V$xRP`M?>^T1)%4n{n{ikHFo1FR6Gip5L_Y zc%Ws^HEk##2%PcE?w%87ir%$`crbA0)7w|iT{^V3>OksG1m08%wCno2jutltZ+uh! zmUyNBcfe1+=kCbkO4>PM;Y;F`4u8@i_r=H8vJB5Xn?sr_e<*wBc;*yp5qY1>3gFI@7)bJpSunMU)7KP4fiO(&FSbLtlvH+n$2wz{YftM|Mqf; zd}IBo#5*cGcg$XR$yk3TaN1X^Vy!<7^?ODD&js!Ai|<_-XgI=7^?~&^L0r}1T5DY%|{-;)Y`~u|u*_qb7$>u#&*!R&gD)uCPxxgX3qZMi*5cxv zpZNQwRg<5u)%f6F-GDovcj5i5^$YCUeo9bX-ZL5c_};i*j=p!%!%v4rzd5<3vWNS? z=ZBPh%eW8Bf;{uM#pwk@jL&1{5l0>!+!$TxJ?c$9h|Cuq{~u-V9oSU${*R|=(uN(D1Z0F=0i`T0AR3lLX4wT4!ZgSVWtAOS zR%QT&GK8|rE{ISNB&a}T76dGUSOlRUqwFyK-RGXylb+m$_xJO=fAloxc|Fg0);agw zbMHOZxn)YPvqwhbk~JFoNu2tJJLH8@mAV5@^vZaYw1<D$M_f`nfi~4&X~iZ#i#7yUalCJ0RZ!+?R7lbP7}E;dBt)i+ax2 z!fkd}3YX}-zR&$({x6T8>utm>_;s1WetwRBafkf#LTxHp7oyBd`930-d_S?zkWqsL zN|odPPN5C*=0Dlotj}kC)qU|4Jq=FO^Y;jM9-4Ds$`d1B-}8Qkb3M-dAr8?3*%=T1 zB$U$^9Id5Su3zX-==y|a!j5$0cUXsvC(5i)J!rhk1mEkP4>sKp{5Sd(3)nZ`ihAx} z)n2Z5%FhSeKi@0}2c7bj$1f{zR^Se`8gbu* zJQH3P`ILctv;p^a@!o}UN%_e6mfT#lcm2YVhn#N|XZ92CJ87xer);o1NQV4wf1c?h z<$;m?!Sb&)Nh=`xBMW@&kI5yj+hu>Gfo}d+=vShAzlOp5;Q=lZxWrdqbq(eZ7jV(Q zU0c2MUT(=BZq##pLmgW`$OAh0pYNCO`6dzgt&e*~=e4uvMJdON&o^G+i)_5GJzrE# zymmaw0)Eun1*+zc$cfjUZ>+b3pU##3WM~0PPQ3Pf6Ak>y?~A-=HU(afQ$OYNjWYK5 z51NJG_2JTn`VTb_(6RP>(rjni+bL#?p~g2TlpMC^b8HX;))h``CLYH-CdzC^Y=Fn{)Okt zM7M&@<3&QB0t3R$!lGdI*nr|3bK=~aFJssfZ{Py5C$C>by-$|&a z-wN%u=jnERU9p6rL$Sv{KhFfexBlcCAKZI(5p;t&OZbELr-{B({7aQt@EapR=lSV3 zt46hE-Kak$6%hPf7Y#h*hp>F!hcD&nJ3A-LwDNVa!J}!vaOV=`n)68st3I3?Q%Z`L)*d2Lyjq+O^W|Evxx9Qo$szr`LE2ON;GcKDy?vCrztH0K zyTadm+^7lhQ6Bif$MfzwcN5k}p&VOJzAUqO-uMUfKk-L_&g(0M z-+1!hhF_o6V|oneyuLDQZL7JaxIY$vu8#x#_Jq!DsqWCm!#Bf1$5&$h1khQ(13R1E zFO5>yt^8Di#aF&&6D|tRBTKeDdb-pIPagaCn*0Rx!8x4skS(GQN z8<$F*dh|d^1;vBwy^xdi{%?EhUF?%Wbdtkk9+x~ub{yQ_{{a+Pj_INB!?g~d-|Tie zPSr=D8zNE9?QOg9!wPDH4u$T2uiE{w;P2f@cOWEE(8-UP&@UQtTqxW9-N?b~00RC0 z@?%YgQM=jpL*9#{e_7r!{;7ggz4HrwSnnxbqn8D!dN&qy(<4#7EckEp5Su^*(>nsV zTHT#7+V{bgHeTDmojv%8rNFqwL0;C7-StY0Eva@p(mSnGpx(_#Pv%DlRe$q!hZp=8 zR%Nx8*DJLC&H%2>((MiOuuoVi;^&tKf0XSyn$bJfVE!>l~g} z#HV~ZFT_FI>bipedjmY)BtVWkcZVIkej(6^8|W!0pOq-(e=n2T%S1h|16b-e{MCT# z3`O_Xjt?U=;{*5q2%oU8^PUGkIr9FYo;JzuXwwDwE#Wc!(y?N9Bs;?n=L zA97kW+sw;l)TDY){I%^8f#RPEKJyEW{rJs#5MGTx>ghMx!`Hox!vgJPKkK$` zni$N_{&pefi(*?swe6ChbF{0pM}Ce3UmQyILlS<=ejq=4QBV3Rn^p-JzGpL+h(R`iMpERtyE5{Hp_<&r>%1F41_Yf#;ai z79Hf@%z{E5>+JxZ=t|vd=S{Kw1`8R&*h;Fk# z^pDPDw-59btQS9f`l1Kxr26H*K)c6QpZ78Qg~k!B-BG~rFEsBQ$4F=^<_TK6g`Ubj zX3!%B{P8G>uEbNHDE%h?<5eEO)y z`j-SEKk0NMj?Pk8*iWDB{$URbAU{|^=l&Vitb9tgpOk)FC@`Kj;340C9XfR8D)qkg zi=l%n{8qKezvcT= zdK>6$-&S|#p>dPkam?=ko$XtF@b89i#jhX5bT_w;>)7NuXE#^}R=5hfJ`r@b?{>G| z9hR-ErSAPr`M}q6Tymf5(|>qhl0krf{f4PX}KVaB(_sg)oWk>mk}_`K2~4*ec79)5w34|9MeaehladC^HXqn$OP- zDE9fkr^d=+{}Azq2V4J%dj2gFx@qx~98QR$Fk>ip8x+PrL_cXk7 zvtV&C0~ZBcV_kZYU~$PpJYs-5*x*u`T!;(B*^6QE7*nYxi;JnB9 zB;ad)FyJ`P2^dfFOYM1@Xf(fc@c9+|{5=GdN!ZQtBRtJ7t*96L+4F0Dj+5V`dVVoI zpLU+B&aXA|1&1V$=GTb^5qBPUI6ghkTlxl@Uvs<3kh37Fkbga&bfiO_Uu)W>da~aG zzI2q_t|`}R>_@%e4-I!?T;lmJ&nGL*-Ru7zEn(>(`!h6pI3#&=-Q&UUNPS@ba~xPd zAyNFL>z-suj?zE<&oAy z*@Ks^EW-0r|8+?mu1{uVRh+N4ipFRhOF{d5-C}X=Z^-9QrGJDcu>L6d`N^dvn-%Br z4yr485E>o_9LLdz-_g@*n~XX8Uw91TaorS=NBHa8LtlTu_YYY<#XYicU_4`hCk)w> zIY`i1&)*Mi{E%Z#bk`8jalJC~)pB|NdxNb;p#1dipUuy1UwJ#}?rPqgtQ8pSytc0}Y8{)|CMbh@5%Nxuot`)+frwa*`Dzt=@_=sAEy$YDM%b;%+R zyc#<3@uBEpOb^gQ$qzg~#p@MwyJV!XOf|mwg*_a9+lYSk<^E^~o#XpY_W=vJKPvo& z)JUNhKPOnS%hyxn_3(I>kN&iCNskrsbDK#_M;;FT?%#oWT+x$$sZ7WDzN+b)v!S3< z|K|6ioWNzGtW~nnz+lf|^1dkS4^shQ|H;vM&_cjzCH~-_TzU?%KGwiD(p{7L1BOX%`KV) z(>ERRqJT?pw|9`FuhEHm_J7pQ`AfoJkCIETUDp}bcVOS%!~6QbDUW#juji8>x7{DJ z%1;U(-iz}gYJu<%x7X@S$+-dZUyVL(NB8)E$9vMJFbPr)E(?jDI#+D}A+i03k8anu z=ddAzhw)a2Dpkodzg|&=gukr4?>Nur%2%2IYCpv|!|Sj$I>pYA&qE&YvEIgot&Xu? z#GkC8_b)lI2A^k0@BGk{OWrT0=dfXYhYcIlcd&nVMpYlbzFClK@+LIy?Az3g^^M*U z=*I)w^H!DpXe*3kVo#OK;1jbN@9L5q90(n6^JuqVs-i z96#rj@w?^tMT3vyXPQ}e8T*6Uj|AO?^4%)?el-M<&)*kV`f`g;iK}|3@n`uM=T99B zzaXE7JfNqc?E7PZ)<(!z{Of<7G6R0f0&ZBda>c?m{vy09NyMM^F&7nnsn+`N8Iwck z#eWGO2|WA92K=V4N4}dYnvtR;ycu|Yp2`J$?vziO=e7mn$^Ll6I}y0GkG37llRYjP zQ!oytfgbu!>4N;6DDh{Zp3md;P7dysPvSSfA?)KkXjXk;B=Ci9{IRq^ zko%e1aX%XPgxdRanatJ=o%i=dj+zzplbm3oKuT28~^xfm^ zdaFuS{m=ZIw~M9}uNPv@rl*206J_P^KdTxl@yDayR9yHWsa)d~ypBWq^Lj3~f3rvT zeRBJD@Ui?aQx?A=%Z~uviSn$Y>DPSSLhvz z5PsqKgjAT3CXeg9&T0p)?af(p`Mj*?Z?M!7_HmymQsm%bYMT!7Z#>IK|EaL+%shEL zFNx_G_ZO}B=9sKsD(D=4=hu#abyg?nnJj0A?q|OKq;bTAdK3I)dQ;f@=YS!}oCiW% z=nGr~aBq#-`zY8tE6c0v?Dm`7AL6iXXh*xXnjZ=9SE6S9)7Yrq$8!5AXqV&Ff5fG3 zvcJ-q4u4tZ45%gh%Lh99Yy6G6E9H15fNm)%{7`7xxw*mo6$e}ta8+v7KOf9rF~G$D z=bmR?kjpA8BLCab{}K`Zc;JSW*)lfR`e!P}GsY(YU$$ulU9j~}?f6SA)B0aLG(1dXCe2oqnhRbj5GsQRuh44(tVf-&?QLUb?q z`8zR{rmyWT&qotM&p`RiZg`*9f5=|#b0{CDA3MS>ljU2>2s@@eoHap~uS2~J<%V%H z{^9R~mH_nrtUk2@aET@hw-w{kdt5w)vKkU{yS-uYSHk8FI6O;M7r_`^t`QiXBdf3h! z-#exGnKnO37s^{R;^zi`GD@P;x>~CAoB9P`zw`LO^TPuVwin@b5#ptT{K)yo&n?gB z^~(`y{@}k()ZsbecWPA0Xi=+ESLWyQB0oP|^sb>uh?S_Sd_R9;DG{f&Su=Zf+|Y6e z=>F%X`8nR3RaW`eMBmTY^_dBYme2j-aNhtaJ**oM(c|Jc9mJY((fpelXmlt+# zSv;y(s8xme{}5hlw+;BH^ZCZ|xXlcN*V^p@zF_Lc1fycNe5m~(H1K?r2t46}+K2Oh zzA^dz=YN(N%)Tth%l~E4_Wz50)(XNO|AbGu{C}}88u%xL$DaviU!>+aeK+v0vyc13 zu-sox{=dX84f2jWEw%ptVxO*}uy11J3t#AR!p=np=WERRdR4hTmwWJvs|qH#6cC)KOx8{`wer@iM{o?9VS z!J*Lo!%I^wYYoAS}}eULQJ zxnIQm68SIR2OKTl!t?mZ{`UYs;a;B3CXN58pP1o)IW9EMcd^~z=lsvY zZy8VXeA8RPZqi52>!gw*e*fqjl{xn?gP&*f=e-m6_cNNUj(fFmlmC7@%lG2>hOIl! zH|R09#(1s#C|oDEEL!hw(chD@P1r859a;2M(=phgk`hul;5v^j%ToI#PDI2 zRj6#25BBD--K}DcgO4)^KyvtbKQ8%RXx})OdS60FQpM?HdA2ITfA`yL?$u*ag%&JN z37L9u$>UG25z1~6*jZkd#cuUb=!Qs5KHZ(YVh+eEzpbjUllQm0vGBd-A#Ojv(E&Q|Bhq5= z{408i?gpLT2Rd44wdLO(0RP+Qh(z`c|AV^?K^-QH00`@Ft<)U z6hFT8nwFJ(0StD7W$hUZ;`<3stbQyf7R_!m^UZh0em9! z0Y9qe?6VLm9c!1-5d{=mK?aLJe&-Z8CXvYh_gL(Hw z@^^)}6|z@{{>lE&0={{fc3bnf1Lrq{Pr*3K`!-l3g@5Y&)w4%lS5CYOcz!N08u-OW zX1>bj$ceWC&-<&pfgd&L%5V9jbK;YbH>`g$@UJ?qd{)4g6CV#e>z@Jq{bgBI&5=3r zPT*O8a}8l{j|C0G3tDsH?W|9<7=LWQ`!1(_S;(9duibyt1$^<-O_B<0<~KCIjMmIA z6M@$$2lWU4KH4Wl`-S&7>W8EdRizseF~8vX=ie)%_R8~5b4~Pr@Gq^Dcd5j0QC(idWl@20!=Lk&~|8&`Wd|=zP9BmizM6P>JpVozIv0u%{-2M2`eL8Rfrk zC+m#a_WAYW^XbByH&a3!I`vS;fAI16R^#!)rh18Pt|jc}`S;zqk6VOF^hl;-{=B4C zQU5+)BtH%Eqk$`WIrrc&Nk13!<9u4Ad&wc;65RtjpHJVi4}RYy(X$ZmWZ+&d|7$@m z(3Sq_zrW4nMH;s^C1z~yB-IW6KZMtg7g@j`S(3gZPl6w+{zG`}cwwzA{FT34){DIH zIr2M9J6=Qsf2W>tNxrz8cd6Wizz8=!OE9{f;bUkE2J-J`WbEQiQ9PbY@ zx<=FM&MOw)KQ$xjA<|BW&K*7d8y;17ud-Tz+Itt*iWQbV4z`~=YNVt<3={M5E% z%XXmumAneKyeI7A>#fKKLQe9S2XAQCj|s2cXTh>d;FnEYa9D38so4jO6Fk0Hu`WM( zLbVzpHh~EyF9G`eRJ4%)z9&m0c|4xEA+L5R@1G&c`I3%c@-iVWeqirSdK;m#4<+`m zeGk*wLwyBE1uO0P=bKSc!e8rl6^Q(L+3gepkX}3v^Zkjll{=N;@i>@XZpis!>9|vR z=+Bz{Z@ua;jN0|#9<}cPJ`rU+@I6X=oN3Vbh48#DfeH8& z;I9=2n#%GuL{u^_Vd|u~?g8Vq(bJva?noAkiPk-2tETb-SWZj{8=Y`oiAUXA>IekteJZ#oveaqkuaT<;@=&ClEw; zqMq}^R=(F`gGA^4%llGvGEHg3{g?RT!JmY(p0m^EMv0%t6Xt(jtAvHe6XH(=Una_; zSv{tON&Kewg?%3Ee_?ofbAPx*j{rRl^me&^m~E2icF=j>4D*f74Re7`{>+j8!0XpG z?3CNdo)jhFbL2npwFjhj;{6esi|{$}ANbM}Pu$|?-()=R%i+&|;3xdksZX$d5_w+^ zfBrWR{+hMB(Xe3qB<9F};2V{XUHHHDN%ZGG@HO9SR+aWiln*+ubN(x1qW_?E&UEBq z68QPNo{rx#p3du8s3##xo*1HvihjYkK{eY|ie;OljT=PAzz zxU_(|{fOSZl?QN##9I3gat-WD58|pH`)1ixl0GiTrQgbaT)C3*dqr%Qr&LD=>ET-< z^zefIaNQa4QYq-^sE>0AT+-E#HnW~8zlMIbzGE=^is;cD1RswN&$+qNwyx$Pzqs0S1*+m%x{MNPaejct`k^P6{Sy&#*E>|ag%wbpjqP!WFeUM*L zfjg9NK8z_O$K71Cmk#>fL6)ns-BB$9>0KR9?r^M$KMQ3{Nj8t8m|@0=p+9q3Fqu$_dZgY1n4J`3gE zWn0GcS{u==4H0M9eeY9m30@N#kkf1g>rR!Z$fqhCdX{!ZbH6Zs&3&f9Ly_~HVNAjHql`|$oe^{eZL z%l0M%&*RVM)joK@`Ay@ZR=$uMs`G#^4P}e_rIU% z!+nQ>?P5L%wGvfakGSUx|ML6aJpYL<*>Q!zro#MxlsxtCyPtse7(cvM+x5Zbx4f_mSg)C#O(;_}BTC3P0X`Bf6pVzLvrMo~Y+_zVhoHy(`aueUQg~ z%$J_~Gl}1rj=1r>a_3QdBY8e)`AFCsg>q87@0>nHgpBlyVLIL?ZB*s2QT%?Dn%|)F zb5nEvYrdBEqa%6(=sa$|J18@dtQMKMy8gxBUvL^I)!dY@kWDpy2cJPEJOml)uqzsXxCw=zkRE_*({IRt};&P|x$EBDdPjuutYM<=V(uLemT_SLf zmV)0a@zHpmF8x;YFlfJb620if3{^?!Y5G{$?VBp(9qzLIKI=qwM1b!7LePKOk{Ze5 zG10ld@On=FKR=0<`R(9$qHI}x?H$>V{QaDG(Ce)k`=;zime1=u4^~W@8%%yG_z%w6 z&?cDtOwgA#9{ezvd|s!i{oS13g2|6)F8nmM?Z5tg`pACP-wt})NgpZS5f?{*f2@MP z^QU_Pp5wJcuXyms7wfV)nEpwi|JNqhT1mdaTqQ7%j$ZrSBgZ!a@-xA|aL=O#a{Np! zgkBM#uUs^)SFrXYfZM-h%Y3PQqh*?CpXDE_*3c-+Pue8tEI+09tXDEU9&$~a1@3*< z-{s`?ouDV79FkenA-B)_x}<`hyV&lF+5Jp!w4*)~rLNVbc6{ML@kxck?1Lqw>jGmE{O<()*L&SB@cfd-ff&s=5Dy$R zpvVugekc55>m$l~?>tN^)U4G?&<&};bIz7I^OgE+E$GHf(Bq*;qrJH{$^J975_YqG zmyiAUBwIhlzQ0AgJU$dE5V?rkBKz&&=l*{^A^M;kUvA$C+@Ud>m&);t*U0bu;grI% z{3P)4_;de@{TF2Ushaki<-Hzo-4+jeCd#`*KKY96SK4{)^FqU8`;YA3b0E1AlM- z-~Y|+Co^AH5s!{XYU_#(+~R)^Dh+hLe*DJs^z3&Z=TaAk75(*Dpf4eT%CW+i_U~`6 zmMxl1R`!C?kPe{oCZ#L7txsGcykJglORBRq8l{<1Xv( zL44f6t#1=jRvxD!kiW^G@9Eh4TlspN`&lOX`L(;JT5_JN_Jhxk@t|@-uKMygWrut| z&zAaYMH{)FvHZxk!atW{?-Y~!ajJ%Y-~JifWO_9CTqtLbtr>8h_b?rPSeP&3KlYQN zzdwJ~joK8)8BZ3=D!0_a&k_3R>Zbn+J!Z+8j#Yd`tC5c>ep!&u@pGXaU$^_=p;&hy zEFFYT1D^BI+)miNsf+C%`&FRT{$orA-Ui&Hy?MWo<7a03K%cY!O`SZ>vVZM3pX8c$ zDHpdx@k<6@1mbt;Ww{RWd5Gi3^O)^7Z4-mVFAH+I4#?$|204p!{7o**CiIg!T=R=#9CxB8Y3Q!)@9vWF z$`}FpslZiR`et`dEJdf+uIngC(~@1Uv=d^+IBn`A?7Z~-nv*k2l(|8+D0D+4>e(vL@6VrK@%22pzp(ri$hk7=h>6E0 z;^%Rk`JejY-jwO-;PatO&a<+rte>Teu$#y6_ATE0LCRDAd6tvEjAi-CH%h(Yd9a^; z0XDU7J8IYI#3~2q=l{y%Hm>3QhYa@n!9SiRK%X8rx9tu6yW0ywD0UjWsONET;r2@> z1-D8!W`NG)V3qs*a&gX+pLo8h>niLmGx)t7>}S%GbCOHWVdY`{mOY0J|B%~)J|T{_ zA|Gv#H|B=fTX)5$y#J5Eg?iR^cBgkat;rsv2XxkV*Y`CaO8OeK`|*GI;hnv#1M#PU zpXa~&od-ur{KhP%WBz+Gvda&8tB^qa$)KCN34h$`p6Lsf=vLMb^sg2)KW6})=1Xz# zH_xx4feSfWuQA_06s?K*Rg5M+F5r8XedzxV8RJR6DBu%;dvt$BIl12?AfMAff4BCT zDI7C}-(ac}c>U11(&%}z{4DU9KN0pD&)&Ylv8VQ9AU_iH3ll!M!P7>fdoV6UgTAum zm}5LgA$l6--!9M(Z|pdd=Q6b3r(Fji-DrIv3FCwZe90(@PV0TC(r>a;S1!;_eeaf& z2ulaaOVO-1_#}QMUtaqjK+o9W{d`F#G@7G?uoVzN~=pg^P(f{~+5_vX^ysNaY z9;*MrpM~=Iy^7CR7t)hs%_Zkf?;(SG_jL_d=W!56?S*8G6@HHFF6`{d;tLd%Y0~5ngEg|1`BFr5(Q?-H@{@yw19vci)*q0EKQyLOuKDME=Y3p(fFdsi3nTXKa4tWGvA$ zL1#bS`E+|7*$xNjCWr7t__I&Gk^K~bdiP}Ehv{kEzn1-E1-~7*rn`q+;`x%I$5Wo0 zaLI$da@~^Sf`$CSy2nG_j`SaE*C>5*JNqLA^^7~V@8Z?~e_)?E&hy116{!G_KYZX% zKwccO7q_#%M7Q)5e&D=${_)US@;J-utx>=&+8F*h_Z8w#hx{1O7uTxm<32_H;I_DA zUk;D$IhZ?{A}1scb|gT~w-JYKnv>c*U_W?K&*MRz*meQqc?Q#?McfK(zO;{hMtbUc z2|HQOgS9_7&UzA^?c{xFCr?{*UFNrf--fc{s*9aDw#4s1JwJyrZQkjMoCD+sZi`Fy zp)%fl7TYlPGma_j_2)$*?Huj~)-8Pb5yLb>gy3O1tAL3)~c z3qSCCl~*>0yJR~fH1zeu&IYUt*+J)gFm5<8pKT%ePSDwpEmGp1vCTw}2c7*r#yxWe z`;q*_|8vQ_O6TcE8?#pyrm#JJKczzMS<9a3)pOna1NItxsAn60**d-(iy(b0eUSgi zpS<@ww36-N{fN1L6(bG}S{kwkb;&R;Ai0%WO`}bn2*(djJOJ89>-+!*$ zuXcXu{NXtkmpmsMJY={?pq#_7PHETgb5lRzkEOTvd|v73 z{PP?~8|pcaUS@RqShgz@`Z$0)xv^`6d>t8w{BnbS`CLp1`8v{xaWoP1xo7u}mFJuM z{ve-!-?B#jEayQ6_`Eo86>eGc8##}4p9#D8y!Osdr5AJGBENHgv;wzhP<$zlAJKW7 zw}D=(=Ejb4+;oTw(`!2>9F*y9@Y#T~KCIDJj%y<5JboTty~)6FrS|Q}3oCFZQifHR z^~*p#k2@9W_05#q*Exm#Z0CWa({IY{TacG5f8oP?`(^n&4zT~XY#x4F_J0ESdHz(_ zQzu}5CI{Mgqdc?X_mlFxBN6o+ze#tOo|EI}Wq!o>!HZ*7IerpAYnY`+z_-_zIY*iUl4+t8j3xI3HY?Uv(Z1>FVum{NN`ko$ud z@$!Ja+tT}m+#ixr&;4mo$phu({@?(A8gQ=v1~%fpPWj?Rf5-y;{i?5wJSHe~LwW@< zUUPqb7+Y@#EzYF!rD0}_ZNx7O62hn*xp9XrPTqhIdd~)p&?MH(CUX$Pck>&G#zvcnL zzCZT-Syj^C$owAgAK5cEzsw&AzG#%O=db-I>&MSYxIq7S+LLm!emtHfuMm1#YUx|c z?R)!)de*PWCmjNwV@QVFG?d2o2N#yx&q94V=DmHs_4>clM*d^{%man}ch|-y@Z6N> ztRMI1_AOopJXdY~EKtA1_N_mb^^b;J7s}JI*K*7Hc~I|ME96|e(4?L0AJ#7!xNn|} zyAq%u)?L{@weroh%kA^JY!>*l2DMuvw{IRK?B?gjUmUv=aQ}(hj|A@E8yo!JlUMTK zwd>QZhV5EFaFk0Cy+`???}Gb*cM<#n@GQYI^OLjvkKw<_&PU5GR%x-kWGzTRtG zXj&=85wg|#pPjxNAdkzW!wwb?n`VLEd0_et@LU3x2zBQB?`D- zLh@IX=UaT8%=;pnZJ*_l-Jme;!+?D?G1lb9G;Nx+n`_A+X#uAqv&{NL@}m|x;IxWfbW(~p_*sT`k7jee^q4eBY&=kveGCG1}l z-KDZ5->-iJ=uvSMBV_-xeAa(k^8@j+d^`A@C}&Q*TVM8nD)fs7J>fyZP09bpc+itT zfAYy2yX5?e06i7-LCfk+k>~SHjz8#=mPBun=MmB952m5Q{-;$tmX+rbX&5geK(ExP z`TO!bC=zr#=$-C2e<;thJQ#PKpx5@DT*UJS%8x9ZPvSveacII1^1Ol9>AAn3u3K`P z?B7)IMMF;L_`Ln(_$7g!iL&2`e(CbOgU_2T=vnaZ(>vt&M8pceIKh9b+PQdHf7Xxp zN#9b+_kpaR6Z||be;?lI9a%p+=W;bOxVZcWutQyD+c5@Ju*(--pi!uQ{qf8g(>J2AiFr>8sz=aT2_^t^%p8=9?$$d4W9l(_k?zvI#V z*=lJwevf}!HC>?_yr}0`g#K0T2ia~cC%Y0*&+9|2dXz2! z(L^_R+k97=5Vc=MOeH){T+-13!OYi4%IP&sbhj?ypg(=jRXR8K%~h$J+$R zj{)x9Pp$Il1- z<3OJn(fqcoe*)@xetu~D?p5-8foz`zxYCcuEtd65M|}*+P7l&g1hkKOKHsjGGwg4v zeS_T?*nfWdB#-*c0s5!WGDi3%3Z=1siBod^rEvS87Y#SqE_~LOsh-^}Rnrt6m$44X1b6b7)M2?RS{2c#Ld(Q;DPPdE|b~dU% z%_;krBF9Btx%N6U%{!f7X6wt?(`?QR_u9*P;ri1?R_aip(x+e9n1oS^2=*yNJ zJd_`k5~7>A=T&-mn!_ z+Txf~yLA6h`&fUc7BEGwE2?~*uEj9Vxau$DOFnw=|a8_c+UR{x39R_7png5 z!2ECZ>YA*-e|(MtF6@`D3$T8QoY$^{HH}kdg3>w|w;2aH4NFCSc{ur-kKhMGBI@~m z?zVZu0_^aD&hxSi_c>Y3oM6uUD&(?h*>@IftcK2@k|EfU`MFUL2=ei687@C+@b4B{qtbblkYun z$!i8Qzt`GMcKe_IgIwdR-m7n3nmU&nROkj5>Umy2rCo*ELK~HC^nlL#p0ZajE$eFq zJsIVd4Ml%o-;q6OsONt3+gry2-t)==ozJTqW-W=}=kkc3=Y8hM!Y@Y$em53m;`&?n0SdM}iN7&~X zXs6umm6y-=I{pjC(KJoi$+-Ma-~E*(kR6t}VtipcLJqeKc)!&Sex?`9_#;#9ml2>l zQC2FvV~Xr2_9MUl+WWw`&t!U%M*f>++lR<;j%PZ`cRP2@P5 zz7+QJefA#5O!3?w$w_bb}Z5Jf7;V&v}<)9^PqyTl~NEduR3fO~TMbaD2f+I}z5 zKF8%~huJpv1<@lAFOJLlUH=8VPw9nRe!gMIsuL@vd6qE|^bC~$+!))DeXh3uRbbo? zB{rGN`YC>T?Q?qS^J&?B^v@q`kQdeN)WoZgyR9UM(vHE2dVc~`8 zwsLUqfbVZ7Y3OIl_llM6Oa-0$!LPaPE9Cx>2|D|0=l8eI$o<1K9eDtM59x8KKtLQo zXFs3+V8<`)N4j4aKTC`ctUs5-1|K@j`6k;N(Hnk;+{Mkic9QK$K)nj}-MM62mFMY{PcHXURaN5VkE>;d&^P1jUg@vy z=37qyimMIveEyq%X~##hoet2s|MhBHE#NxS4LbL~X`hwLC;Pz%I}(9w(K+)3>q_}+ z2i*($%oW#f%lXS|Zd~%You2!mv1@Sufvhgs;~%$lGljhyj@OBOF)!{W>GabKZx!Do&E7wY@TVdKQdrvGH~bC zUyG9FJ4P$=JPq_WMkK9en8!kEiLt@2aaDHbf|BydeH}fpvk45RfJeuGb`V-r0 zLp|emZvT2G%OHCkp!4{3;FF>a8B6pm=;;RT+>_S#I95b=W86vv{hsOK-|{+XBF<}G z&=(E(ry+KZjH(j4Q zH0vpRA5F;1elCgU?MeUqo=1M~-ZV$p$=@|PR_>oUY$(m!wa-ID0AK8vJf(PCqPFND zyR`aHJ?+Pn3BB#$&srq>ABW!@2f{0MhImjf__M$B#@|QI!gq##czEEFc3)zOuTL}o zKX)WXeOH|1QG9eBVK;yOBmaP5i$fxbD(F_G<9(^4`qgXo65R$m`*mf#p9h3WblzXe z0o>DbP3^pYEuA-9Ny2`L} z4&d9L(EpQL8I0ukQ(n7~*Srsy2Y8Z6@lCY|{dk|R>YGj($?0WU+?YC zWyy)x`pX0SpxfuVX#GX~j{PP3k@}sN{Q!QR!)D>PjHiBQnlJo98d2P$dI>*soH<`h zXKwR9|Hs->+|o4TkzJA(p$pC94ioZt&cgoxK0M!!5VMd({?fLa06EuEiHg=}ypjUzWk|*ZlU?^U@DN*T;j-=jv)phi_jw>q<+alU+%m%X%vNpc=UT zT-WPP_J>j*ngRTsvQf>rKTsUqn(yWMfO}cG)e7zSsm5J{H-97i64LHbA3aYVNJ-@& zJn!?za&5rp&)8EdRD-8Hv7-N`LJt@4Bu}yRX%YHIIk@Ee>w||h9x}M!h+)dh!W~At z`ZgUrB5>W1{p5wbo@-82bIk8Kf@G0D**}cqdVYV#vLHMDgy;H5sh-9kALQFnUr0Z@ zCi|Pl7YFKjpTu2J_H*oKqPs!o_kE9)>vE9&O7uj~`TOfNx6iu5ek8gVbnh_HpN>9T zH^=}#6Fr0J*l%ZD!IO1N2vChfCw1HlJ+3XKsyX z6Kwp;@jYDNYt*pZ2{!&|^T`AJuw3V+(D)}G6erFnIj+?I6A>pb`2GDKzh%5S{v~9` zpYoc=Z65bHUT4#YpC|rr?J4)O zAU_4=%F9>Q@OVIZkl9h>2gh;6g=&v@en)gy2SGP25_W&98_<&1eMz4z%nSJWrwHKM zU9Z!VugBPa!lwbx^H4kRVWsme*Mv>AHv)KmJ}nOTAEwM)&etj|U$qBzCIQ!|QuB`T zbx=C$+1>&npM1&p|AP6~2mHTFN-pQ?4{ne0N*hn2spl2wVOcEv#(8DOZ;n6VDX$!; z7yQ|I#oyoK`Rw)ok_PcOL0CG-Zr(qizb9vHTi#@JsAP5g)qdY44ecf6Yv~S)7C8Q^ z_#s^TeU~iYe_r&t*B_2YQ- zW1fGSmu8O(N<0jaRYkwy`Ddi9ckh7lA9$XBy1rbjljon2j|D%|zh7Umiym>JcqcMH zu0LvD+SoZ%qI*H-Jpc9C>IKsEMVK}pGJvl+c*c+**B4>he9(O>?ER|y<<>#2FT%9> z5DEO1H770wxxNU~=7R(HEnlq5%g;w}ywrS$z8>Iy+`OtuF6sQ_MLnOtmedb%<(AG* z+I-3Ye(?5|r}IQ`OQKZr!$0nFKIxVT`%Sec`SMzF;mWZQ0(AbKks;*GCPjZN(v0bL(D{2t$;Xd< z+IMoxiJ^zg$HET9Yk?kON)-09ebKis&MDCTHt(Al z5&=5fH~fot_xzPMS?!4=-wrz4=gS(FGQUg&(?gt~vwi;+TeGWG_trpQv(yheddkcP~|7l!H1w94V%kY0o2s&xF4ip9%hV zH27j*ykm+X0kA9otRdqW<_oGV1Vxv`M*;g#_R zcpM{r?4T!No*Iwe^Sa!7$6%vYvJb-RUI{sjPXgZYJnkD~WHy%mBmJXti}uwU@k-sC zna2)nS#x%=mOh6nlw*41x-)7|*fEd(SNQ$sUA8a1-R!%12T=vxzEa5N{oYeXuIUr% zAgYK@1n7Jn;KXm6XGvWiuLWA*O^j!M;P(8-^1@DKabvJR^X=ICbtzqnh>EJk&ma?~wIN zt-Su8-Yqahj|V^d&pE~Ub|~o7o)h`U{!0SB#`b;E;cvOu3G;LCon%|i1k`Jj1K66RI>{VFH$gj3>Sh{n8%zhCv)2Sc~W^D6!x z70-vKersII`K0*A|NSZ+-_jxf@WcDDocF8~#XkjfAIhIbk6t8ypDJRlu%Fw@Kcm)T z>HAau@r6H5GPd!Eu;m%wRE0f8{vIfg9|xOn*`)Uf4b=RHe4fWu=rXu!DCoiLNdkUt ztMBg{+(HijmF-Doxql7qYK#{MqWd)VT>P+j`><@f-<~%^1W$!Oy|Z^&{(DBhh@bty z^Da~S1ye#C0!#Fmb;4h4&+(5wOyluVwFh(_Z{qN~)(;=O$>#+jO|)kLJptu~%pKw3 zLGBIe+^}V*Q=b8}oL!z6K0`;9dXh$hNf04eKtS^suz!^jH5DbvO9kEzTtbV)?k4C<@|^I$-+tg;-fO##zZ=Fej~H`|3?=oVxe4%70Ld7d-y@5;l#L^Ut(C(Ed;DzaINv`4<6v)clj(3~tdT z|E2c0KiPqs`R%yla{k4kp7Y3O==yE2{3`={YHY1H@bA6mjnoFo_aY7)&jB~q#)jC0 z21HNS*z?npdUf=mlmAmdXaD=~`%mNb{e1sMNE7WPfNt3!{4_sn!_;8;R~Gs<*w^L@ z)0hta{=(O>+#lBFTeOYuBdPfSxqQBg$M1r5&&GyYSrbvJ@dP~yWw*scK9}<=6M4e& z(t-PP=ZMn5@+%d1A8^mw$IQrs{388woc}foKlB~e_`AH$K>Y}x7oMYIxqp}A1C0yUE zgq!_P^&i6X`VHS#@_sGGDa-R;D(bB{@q9h+g4{%u&L6wvSU({792dUdmJjnUq5g~Tv$%O`tM7!pHhMEIPt0kQ9Yl2_hI9$Ojy;XMWitZOL5MH5&L<7(32u%)cYp}eR@iEg~ zpz}I{>-x;~Yld8Y8+5$~^auFv^St--=J~l^k88}I3_7nP{8=t->5;)3)C{Bc)3|-C zBkcR@jPsX@+to)>NdGL*`5BdY%V!Px;o8%8NIvx!^EP2Gzh}?u2zw(d>w~T%;5sDw zq3}y|CBYxR>CILAdgXC+!6YT;1N#TsV+WxNSYvBF=_&Q+Ds<2Px>i{qG&5RfA z-wUh1TDpI4FjW)v%zxk0J-5uS+b;C=;ySzQ)LVPy^;s+E{9H^}?r~it`9>S_V|}*# zfYFEe`2aJ_C5qyO&>>a-P@x<7XuB=I?~Rj_u$7ez0*Ns)X=2U)R}y zr}!)OhVVFJLw+9X7&i0mw>~?@bPw=+pFFNe)7vF}y`$dTRrvMEp!2x1?@}dm(L#mQ zWhs)+_ObkNho1e_pjaLC))3LNH1h4IXDm$~*WnGcuQ%@y_VGQZk}0*4yFS}jm-XX$ z3d?`=Xx`>2wJ-KydNlZ1|L;Ga-h2M0vh=DI*{^qjt}fClb+taa>d5(=*bM*8e^XVM-*Sx@YSkdV>P4`phvs(LvUCR9^ z@MWQ7-&=PFk9!pAiC-D#jLFMIKJ)hn{)kSvn)qwRto2R_Hulz{KaC7_!Up#7EfsYW8zcCqf_E+1th^pZ=M`m4zfLIXeXL+ zgMQpA#l!!-YhI^!8cO$)?M(z9_pd*#zGb;&`VZ_eQ#8_TV_pcp@&#QvdiO54APM&p|edE^3r zB1)pG^B?IqjRSFeL|*ZC!?SQ7cut*)3Bj)0c-@8ZnUGg@*@`vnea=O9uV; zzGd(6yqMyowTJZ#WPG~-`Q@ppLheufun~;hJY;OLFYaeXnkfUI2PX9OUzL{AV2>blAUb+;gTUfX>$uTW>wPc+}oc z-6KP3U!MZHdV`6We&5n>@3>9xgWu@dFZ|^=F3Mf4ig@%o;Z@S#2Y$XUTlVkzFG3|c z@1Ml{8;@=NTIP>BfN=uP6`r-7sV(#Syn*fSxKXp4Opnv>@BDAjdj_d}o*!`g?gPTkbjZ&FzDk}2zvpu0#HS;!tdI3);fJOBr&Y`C$cgs= z9|QT(z;{jDQz%b#PP|TocLRT7dBMfmU-G0Z7ygMxo?9S4ndM)OS(7g^r~Gu}eFktI z#N$QlA^q~_#D`hh3jcUfntu`YRvi0z=>paq^22=i&V-Fi;0OKwxw1b@PP_-WRFp2@ z59H6hSx}b~?*fjWKTZVxlis~f7RnNS;lDI4renWC)+Y`4FS?#6TsVV~q9l9@@cf*w z?x3*u=5LQz6-mp9kJR8Jfp7cALVZzhPJB`;;ZOdqfdhEw$d!5DNDjo)I2D65?=n$=c#2OH;u8s6$Lb!SfQiXQ}HPm@VR7 zFtr;mwX2+Ga;4$7Z^ZCL5UJ>+oZpv-ewG3H->?4YtmvU0DjoH_|KaEoj}3Z>ZuwQ% z&Gc*e1~g)yP@F6tA)m(~o?n+v{~?OofjCv4D9DRJ*|ngq0k6-HKJlpM>-|ZcCjXdy zy`TMj>+cU|{73Salxi~HH?`VOYD3`e(NE_UL+n*R+Z5ZYcEeqU>?aQJ3G>2luSSb6Ibf<&lB`_W3*d@pP`xlsX z%7jut)xXqFwE0W~>L*U*jp?Y+F9Ky0O4%2buhFO{e$pc|kKp5c+1Gy6ix5Qtrt`ed z1HN7@c82qPB;rp-y$kny{yWv@0sDpM{9FiMzwWXv2-VwE@#=b^_WCso@|up`yO6JQ z1zOB6qHsNJJ|^^bHW7LM?K?d_4{~2OoWGZm2DvuyJu8~nov(Xk`8?jG;CjdfeCa2* zz6rK|6AhdRdL;tCqeg|6;mUX?`=7?849#^|8t|lp;xB`_l(2{2Ux@P5`hl;j$e-5Z z$iv10r{8G!I0WYnqT4{{c=Y&ie^b3gcQ8NnJsRs75Gv6*A9%eYYR|%{@_L15q-Zx0 zavI(pvshlQ@M_x67~6j)$C32Q;P!EUZt9%vcR6lEcZ04wA?&BrBFaX!WF ziCm+P773%U%en6`=20;V(;q zDEqDNcwXk`?e8WF7^)D`?7@UqDl(+9FrK}(I5T$(y{zGd1ETd@)I=j-+es3ezttQA*Otw{7W5I zw2=FA3i#7e?%v}wNc+MVwELWn{dJf63=Zq(1E1xLu-{bXXAAEeL-Ql8eS%N9?+d;t z@Wr4cx-u^5UD9vr_ffrs9sK+oKX-F{ROBS~9r4mZ=ks`tUlS#H^1cep%i~S|hhNO% zdDj0&*?R{zS$+TGNt(2QGQ!d_gs`L_BOpixfiNv75SE0cVHC;^yDSaJD9DH)5Qb8b zQBfcYXq90Q!6FE8L6`O|*Z`lvw`49OdPyN-uRn(X7 zGuX2E$F}l1h}Yf5Q^L+Y1I9he*RM%F8TtI&ckA2*R}w6wU96MU_cNq|A6QWKEMHF% zY{6IG&yWs&nOUs|$GEOi=>7{2_^)4or7@3dte@I1q-wuh@QD*1-*Ekx?I~LMwaE2! z>K|%*k^;gnbBCY(hR0zpkN9ePQovu>MEf+ytjt&6pOFr}_x0vxwLKIUYI}qo%6*uy z%LDmbq=eIW6O?|F-R{dG4*2}4x24|mab{wN{i3(j5jdX@oXqUeL_Qy|oECoI^Q;`!U+VWM#KrPPfg&vkv_An^CP~G zPUfrEr#|ps+VrZ$kjzYxQhl882cOr6z&|o4u}^&A{iewMaD4t{J|p}w>h_F3Vx52S z`4wLWvw=@FP}(E%oD=(db=uf@lE1aa^+G@ITfDpW?=MGuv_En`nGgDSZfrfO)!CyD znr(xAgXUUvd(Y|GYh0Xk{u1Q+oE7C*!PlHxldX4oBaIQa}UoKnn_aLr6$@BFqK0oX8*S1WZOX#Qe zRiEz%QQpUaN5(iO*R-HMnR&urnsdS*&9@zEBR>aby)JNmZY8N&^-a3;0(lGKho8p` z{#m4tHlqNyL9Y{O#|lf<#!0vv`RtE}dGEa}m+xhH?0*zXbljAlLo@h+^L$jbSEc*$ zl70*D5YqK^cZ^MtaMO8VH{bs-wDDidjlik>xj*{gM+^AfHx3(D1b$$z5?}3q8~8;Y zo0wSC&ddV;WI?YBypL*Rlu87T+MDCS+ex&;*#5&`j1>?39I319b!W_YzUX(49FXJo$Pc~HT5b<3a2L|zd*9H??U99iZjWLs z>UNFQ9)8&213#sva)0iBwFm4Eg8%rl-<^up9$x4*{VeSNyXVt$ib?HZMLySW{N3UE z`S~7dfAx6p0RQ;BRgc<%!L<)I5-i1l2LdOY%iU;Wo*U1L4hqaN>r;Fp~< zWb=PL*TdtzDJcB#+t}|m({nxYx{Ky%9`EIRTEDq44q744>o+HU%Y0hDWg?$?290BE zCtp|i|GK|{?@KVfE&55zcOIQ9;uigk^r^3#<)ggKLnfUm>JmKuOMLZpv!si{57S@u zjY?FFqr_KVH%kS7;?dv}#T=|zq{LTWH_HJ3i5GKg6<5tG#8+Q8%Lf0+&25{Puol*@ zzHSx(|IcD2H7IAG4n#_gy>g#4H;Qvuizl*>7!BSLzb$jx2Pg!%% zE!M@*&(A%jL$3$v)Mwvs&fg7@_4B@4F4{F0eB1eN;v;UB_Dj!NpbCs z6LBQRDUHXGIKzD)zf5bfUyC>++;K_xjpxJ59W~GCB-{m@=Tl4LRocCe7 z56*f*FUk9W^Lo^_z1d)cga;YNdeoF@Y#1-$n#-boJbv}s{?mm72{!}h@w;bj*AXLd zr5y`hf3|}E!=XRZi@3N&L`r;hKXQP7DE>s_qRzs6bw6^0|DfXQ^Aa6}`Rab;1Ha6f zp(l&k3iH+dCmoi-y_7ac! zg%!W$enHQ5!kjDEFrOkoaT`-51FA8Ao^hTLye6lu3wM3*AKD+ zsz*9-9!KhYSf{JjBp8He0_SyPg(}9A@^w!Q@NA^rSAH`nE~&6QpC=6)_2_&o`8>$a zeel34$?G$4T`I`er;aVXE&GwjM?dcC_oc2Xtu+^vpL|{TB^7CfBaOG{k_&Jn^3#!i zweE;pFX61;Tt(;^S*~hMEdAM#uW{V>tgJs1`MF5DT-Mj+^L_GfF6_<&?*F66y?Cj7 z_J5$2DBs=hF+(i>CEpNuIZc;WCI1^}AG!Z)l!Mm&sThA! zAkX7VI)2N1TKBtQ`yZgZBxb5INy;;7lm|0cGWh3SL7bfl7 z{5D@lr?Tjvd4bQrf?SW=LVobM79;iMFfHje0?-($?v4A}9J?J{DtJZ=TS=k;Oyv=`fIQ$>x)znWh~ zJ=lMBOKx~sC*fw`ydP7kS;_Z#pOWNL9HM;2?{)sFmKN(E!ukFM2lVuJRH(#$C)}kf zzw)F`sd18g7MG9v7pA{4GEUyNw=#~@pe-|8zF&at=If+?>TVgd)&l$aegw@O;fEdT z<|!ZZE5Oaj=XvX79dA?F{vgV=f|oQU@UwhBf;#>j;Pw1xNydNOkHGQg0)N-pHckKQ zeguv`FZhcdE;s$x{RkX?LGXv&%1A4!ia+Yt9Di~@rGD*0T$w_`Z``k~_$~9PU)zyS zo~3@^S}x)ywSti6^P9iMzCT-U75?YH#OHk!5A-nq&#NhK8Dj8#cpikGlgfphab9Mv zc*K{i-`-BtgZ-Ef{-blV|4uMRuLr~RM}KF2@^3=^)Gsg3ruR$8_7h)ypQauB7K1wN zQje$Mb$4aqA3h(=1fS|m{U(6&IldGAsL?}?>!c2%J^{#?%dc?gqM#qI-lY@4!L!SFlCVtC&>PK0~Crc>~_&dkkPV4sf=%OXJlbc_H|MU({X7Vq+kZ#z_jhwYr+%XLr{+&#ukOej_2|Al z*`HLOEa)?Xx6(B6gf!pk%?+aC>7|~5F>*X{eYrj}w>PRI*VhfbjIYaXJyWi)x;?$% zI~%6Wk5ykMa6i&EH#(n_>TA&4M|>lGZ}f7EF@V%LGea!jM_}_nB{zk43U#sVoul0{lbB-N9 zQLasRyo&h80ljy#UOak#)mPzRkK&7;yW{?_W5H*a<@KUhRiAz*6W`_fQh#>?_apTl z7x6gkkLg=@-&FJ-u@2FIXGI!9dU;mrErW}hA|?G!_|c2h{6P5U^cyYyig!ly!~GZc zS$N+S^{6`H-eMhSgu5Wm^Z5E1rcj(!5D4dfkOf}1ImO@S^^vTfzcbLOY}3-R{vhi| zd@uV)`ChKHzV-pv{3Yyg&j0K*uct_V`WR7fo?m*~_xG3Q7c=CnNP9J?{AN7rPvZ-( z+iWPu0bbd&e>f9V{vy8mz7rSt>4P3tG&+P|_%HF*_nmmbAH8+#GevC76e;o5_nid6 zZ@E_IEozPChy9CoHvKL9b3NgoESv`2ZvFhxphhp-UKKtAx_@3D9=uP@0S=JWgRs3fHvy>FIirx4`o&3gS4 zmLtC#wZcwbcYHKy3QV|Avez zb7cL=z&S3*)@#*Mu7Cck(fS{1=l?F(KV7B&K<#-qWc{hYGm*}$bNL6U{)Rl*l@0tt zk>_Xf`60DmF6+m6=AH)6zhEe6zsP%r^1z$FecRA@;NgCNxZrr?xZ(FNCdUc?-0HG^ zt!$SS`5ZUr-ajVCjlsb<>h(x5wMYK>LNVJ;XQTy@Om{5d1^mOj$|$g=&5l{1QNF(hEP>ORT-A-Y=x_(SiNw z$omh$Cx0rs|L1p?>3vCQ8A_j04y8RK{fgu&|If z1b}mU59pKEncJJELNx<`v9`sFJ$opnA|MK^{IgX6+!j8|jAG;W9zf2uR$>29m`h8`r{W5hN*}-4E za^%)n`(+$Q+`ht(%6oOtZkdqJK}xtX59$2UZ)#^Z?r-MnM;#k?C?01fb~w)T$#uoJ z#n(?Bd$WAH+%Dz>;RilHyS#k)n^F5;jN|;OanBF8>#)A3{>JA&4)FMX?={uekKlbU zQ5$hS%GaMX;Jc8{+Bd_>7;eBnYpAGrkkKgV(eQttXc$ILz&&$xLj`Nds z=>@o%?b|cniL(~O2ges* z@7y<`bdOm62togam#Qs^CHv|2vOg@vqW$qz>x+r9KTN=FNSnU(pi3-&_))$S zyaBi355@9_7d$t3d5v4oOO)E*hkTy5>cw3!@%`BpZ|dU@lMD0J!Ci94N7BgW+fRB@qg-Th88OaDth z6+a}Tf}e%!5WF99uFt!JWZlH4b)p~ZM8?vk^2iP~F3M594*?#3@0ab!K|bpvKH1@y z^in;!z4$p(uII9zC5OqfBv17Wsp@Ge8RZv!a*F8J{2kk+PqfS-SvutS_`j8>+%F9M zE~IzbT5jotI;B3!{si**Ju!dp{yOrWU&8$={C8 zuFTJYzI`39-lO|D<%9U@eat-YJst1#iBs_@4oqgz&b+QkDis|E{9Q|aKjZB#MgQh? zjqF#h-+$Rd?UWAvnMjYm{ZrI;v2&2m<6gA^6>r92ydinU`MTku!u3rd+24Eu zj`{TUCDR)0t{&ctB6-`F!d_nY4lqyYt#=7B;YkOgapOO`Cdzo03SYdn+_E@HKC8YM zPx$$@!J{6YlyOgK;a@Jl$(Q!_te@J?1^FECJb2IJ%emKz7=oIpgZQC(qPz_714yd} zJLbpxqv+xB%mKa~JYyMApV4g(K1lEt=KJdk{VCw5fdAH4Woj9{h51R~rGsb1b*djP zex)r^m|y5U+aAb$^UmKJie?qkU+6vCx!`Z9b7yIyyD(q<9`SteNB?oFNikPpzWP1l z$z_Fqu4a4QDDI5rQ@rFOUhUwW8u{|-5*dO={Uf`!@Lw*{Oz@_ZY|^!4dbB>`XM)G$ zcQ*KSntOVg?1lO1;PZO`1K=M&TPC|yYGHmV*9Y$#G?o+gRhT<^T!-9G83(3(QjER@p+zNekS+_eyp2VE{T~UCBAw*%K?Aou0yXp zW{l?3xXt64JPy-3Ar*GyL7vC$q{oE)GM~n63-YN18Yj~+PBM@0dl0ztyy^xqZt#0z z(hQHjV=np84SoFnmeFMo^p2YUfb)B5(i#st6se46PwCO+ zMegh8b;X`xb6zD`I>=8s;Bz@^f~L>7oNzn>&&GYQhGkU^7T~KFYU)7r$(1bzW!4lKuMqOaVzObpV`=c|0*{NxutoWSR+)UR9>g#WXU z@^@-8TlhQZ9HJclOZ;@)-|qn5htxF9y)O>+lKE!fR-_@M4?j86gYUDD`TYEv20U{` zQNOQ4De(sQHH!adl&3eS~#ZtuQ^FzK* z-wXbbcmJ(I-<#1gSxLj^U8;3#5PYI3?V%4g6!qo((00S0oxhj*H;sV{hst+zFi5b)C8#48}>gn{n)CE*o>p81=k4y=eTROq-Aq{-dyo#ybJA`h1B$fuy@Dkgek^!VJH73zB=A4;J^8G zr`fzuCG*YDYenh+Kj+5k8bwo?DN@p}jyE^>TMl)~Nlb~sSH+tT{P#ScT`QJcn6Hkv z5cto{9rR`Kq{4i4yqPNt|D-&5{k;;ZcnhD$tL8b%5!wI>2B4ON(Z)&bvd1pFG&-24C2x+!27^(RM4}QFvb15mfOxKVQnHaW8*`7@tj5 zgD4p#=TVFy#8A<_0w`}KjG=X^IsA5>hMj)*VtadGlBE- zH1YSI|56Ws6P^v6=krIVQ7h%^+qsNmT=S#7kJ5jfLGWbUxm9ItDk>!K*^Z5z4yB++Lwhiylb!7RVc;d8qk9qA`9>M1 zxcpSn|MKvA^mF-bSVrcX;2-Yq#+t$(<4)+$^Ek?Ung>!%LNDt|0iQTjKR0kbpNm_& zYX!?w|H%Jc$a8sIzY5*vY+#+tSM(V&p+6hx?Q;!Y;d&7sKtAse-fH^U$T+jmpy>Ob z_q7ikGNiTBX&X2`jqh#{?Pv;#`XxOn{LoGLY~{+t#}AN3vM&|+Tvv~;MPpH#XlHI$ zPI*sy*!Z!NoFFQCwA_xF(08x>o-5CFn$U*J@v6${{72s{ayhJ*Q;yFu%I)#YlgkM~ z-_B(xR~(!;^d^^+R7=>&_PA=coy_t|-v5mM;SB~U2>-8gly8g0EXN0ZEy@pCGwHSV1G$_$l|75kuBgchlzJMnfE$yA-F2r; zkL+7eJ-B~!%CYu*d)6Z2MB#>yROspSzCN{Oxqjgp;lK0@D{z~J{N{wb8|m}*{_AF) zdb~3!S8#m}@>4sBxIEZ#?tD>l7&iof^L$*wnKpszM)u|dPwyq>{XX04S7Dn7PpU2a z!2Kuro6S|?%%TKkUeWN}PdUnZs)!x@-`_g8Ot3^fT&Q0<@FzbUUO_G=BkJp<;4G2$$ok8I7RUdq2kZ{{e!hV+TzSQ~} z_ZgBm*NOH+D?_ajvb+Yk6=~(M<1WQZ`W>*JDA`VjKD4#pwZl7+WKdzqdR_Hun} zvzkt0F8L!1@)q!ZSkStv+#U|#HsF@2UlvV}{NV!5*Vkv9-`<$*CH-7J<9(;DjQVbc zo9l-(n7i((T)q?eex%zbEPssOKT7&j(9c7_d$w<1q6q3o{x-lFoN_Eo;Cegq*>@GspS%s#8Y-t6esEe9zuS%-pVmEX;E=TO_1mV8 z9X>d%eh=kCAd@D%Fnr9A`eO!;mWGM&ewT;KSLCT52J!pz%X2Gnd1QA6@CjhZ&uf3Kw=VV*f%Nh7RGjktPyN>v5*fFvnNS_CKa*(dNG_}IU zQ5PcZk%xS?xz&4ZT;a+nf5^U6;KusG{z{>nw~LttgYa~=A9zNuJxrlg><09mfyJXCj~dZynO*`B?tX2Jff-@63_?pNo91^8b@?4yQHo`#=3ZVdB6sLzJ6m!6pCOp`WtI|5^Aw<5KnOphfxL z3w*0%c{`;Z;Y0R+F7VJD=h0aH&jbEf`mtiN|BVfWo$UYH)uyM$@_#aTc`5U}vj0<& z&;GBM&}Pi6;`Hx_<+cEN)p#hiut>i6>5!S83UU-x-x*X;?sFHG^4{EV>IhyBC(%SV>g;`#&OslfUDgV$eZ{!b|hPiJ}T zPkMAW?(uyTiv5xI7_z@I!GC{xvFc@bl7~gaSNkg){GWzuXO@kz|H#)Z*k1wg4}I@w zT~6gM>bLAKxgS!$HA2qVRQQAYZ3=$N{P6gPeE8Ym_*|TC@%x!W^RHBmGYiAQaZps? zZph`}`|7=pH<+adPq0NlPu?K-e7(>MxxS6Q>(1A+WxkR5XvZM=o6)fk zugO`4;zsQ+!pM(Slw*aw6Di?Joai#8--_Lled+`vD94WrMla6wXcy7{6el_0^E}1- z91G)$$N2uB@|>=!9RtzjMV`yxeWWsI>-;|{r>+hPZ=+o2|uMGO`CdUHqW2b zt{KSZc5l~x#4qyw8y?{N9Kw;Wo_tTfe9C`!{0Q zlMntIZJl}Sb74KLOLbbc|Ab$Z@c?p3&4s=EymcymtH%Qe@=2cJLQ^ezz2e3FW&$tx z4v~L^=m*V`&VS42_49P_d3{`CtLH6~6$?!-wr#}m&>zg;PLM~=6A$ZNQI$XG&CXB9Nq7eE0McI$&N!R^oW{RoJP)7KTC`t2c)^;M z-bVOQ)JC*d&?V}dWEK7>^V+UYi%9+sz@MqWkG6hzuc(ak_<;M#cC4@6NN(>;$Z>o3 z`{!MYPLk*LOvQSmMrcv8&a4R^4sHDS!cch-f0-#&QWlk890wK2OAVS_3|@=Z&39~-U^(@nLzilSC3Sgf17a! za2{u7EZX`}$M?RBe80y9ydM1VeCRpvXGiNFqMzg^UXyal{u)1gSUNk3>Y;GMhY$LE zjf*zx{ba^{$|O7w`Ru26hmKfsxXS5g7&o>ReqcYfIAVror_MvBSN~_EYbWbZ2hM(~|NLk3N`CMEobgO9AJ^k`OSkT9S-#<)z;)Tc z8&HOF6dnKK_@BP&y^j7@>Sy5o!S8zvoE`8`XC+kNd64J+v99LF|HfIva9EzlJ7YWH z2V2Fd+qi#_{$%8HJg+FDDaQSRa31ec!MnNW?y7i6KaY2O-(A^`3*ON>3d+xf9FK<` z5?6H7NqDxZ{K1pI{whww(}CwA{kO!;)Y(m6<4$Y&s*q86@&g;VfczH`V-inuSj!%C6tWDKPxms6&{-ln=evV)Ly;*y75}pE_ z%YRV*y)JPQo{w_v;C*#}@u&m|=l;X>`?7n92Xg&9kYo8j2fz9S%ggbW10Khl!E>>t z5#?xbPt8AJKlMcJt_in)M2{PK%C@`s=w{QEHAxTI!|li4-)ULCQa!DkP=N;^ z$L%|$Z>7^Z3C{=4>&;z98(oW&aQ9xZ-sSPROs59(*fu%-S%0fhBj(BRlk$S_ryc3S zWzEjW@x%4cz&`$;wMI_TdJF3BfgHcT@=&+^`*aeX1DwZ)8o!rKjRUU4M?wzl3xLP* zQT+Kz`Fij~X<~n;(D?x5uCE#YiXn@cA`QnA@Z=YTokxZwJR1+5+&*0Y>bt+*r1-KO{8{IK@BPmjfRAq1;cuZq$RP!9n%0gBL&=e|t;+1n|Q3 z?JVrz^R2fI-+J39;m*lo9OZb>y7#n@;~`Zg|L^pJMRit9_#pl1z}cQBTmJeuj~9xb z|JlDrJB1GVtLV}4`>3*^@6$Gq-u-^=%Uyu${mAF@?l-RNt;QOt9+7bw?RW2q8r9{v zG<6Yv;Bi^ga^lBaPmcz(?fWl2ikI*t z>=U#6orZ5r&{;L%gYHWfeyKG+uPxUvgnBu_yYk!KG;FWsnY7ri%Nj@34ANZqBvfCtP71S?;eC{u2=WG8g23+n}Nr(@V zP59&0+JmPTcMCoIm-tQ|XE5Jc!2jzx!?qGGW{NaiKkyyk^&NQN&ywJgz7*);^_m;J zmBT6zHc5SfG!kDuZh67Ce>=}o%0aAxgUZjrx+e%;^*w)mTG}Bvq%RleNhw$lnz{-5 zyP3NETgFzPi~b{i7S1bqAIbuL)g1|OWv$VCDnA3~;|}ol?(S2i9C%^-v5&(0ly2}U zw^_aEF-x>Q;;Z*9z2HAqr(VwE=E8jSzGV>nnNR$6F3D7wuim#bbr=4a5$I(vA59PM zldJbFi9-9CIoNNsLf(m#@bL8y={NbwU0Te)9_$l7ySL41UVDVw5&YzBVqA{PJpPoP zlqm<5XIAa22UPlPWux^!_ua$2te^JD)$*)2A9|8{2tTACC7kTANxzkP>U?KJIc12T z92-9VVCY~|!OUEl5nNNO8SNToTQ`kxR6npe0y#JKP&pDeui>v^tU2Nd99hJUbQCr?O zbpq#g*D+(OTJpZBn{kYP7Z+C7$or;V;5>dgYc6b`fPO*#4&u8av$`!$q&gS%p0}@m zYu;GYUmIe1oEI5Bc_z8@vn}~~SFNd+u$Rw^YTlgjVW;oxjUlhI01t0qDVb08`0~{c z{QiA}Q-8DpXZyLHqvy`J&VC>+9po=R>f?l5{a-5oV1zxSPaPjw;Keu6oiAbztBL#x z^HuTT1HY@?Ub<-E_$c(!q#`xTEE}T~=O4*L&J~q>KD& z+9&!Q?-$qosf&U4_o-h5P@jCHygn{%8}OUDorv#Y9@3=V!p;qEnyMJgRBFLN{M2_v z`P@%a!JjcTjWS2{KvvKRlkQ`e`=!L?!!eXb-mQ8BN|( zTIeA>AADZN%o+H@4V_gG2v4#L`?#O>9Mry4oP?(U=lH(<?7Qa??G@sACTEImwipR8}j^qNRLm`MJLpU^*e!kkzRg%aw5l% zEYI&lY*YNv+p@eLav`KUT?=Lwk?QA0KEFTkx1{Gg%JQcE!hQ?VH8TUr2A}FfcBpa6C%IJc9BB7+NsjDr zNxzA2uP*A(F_H9xm`8*@W!%mXzw^HrY3oCidb3}{ete{Bf*`8wPePLI=Itvj7@(<`ta*WteQ9{l-`W#3HTIt%bil%X7ZJu|8gK6ZWy z{jc~(XCE%=$K`jMWQsrj*tzf>i3+ZDLY~WS^lW|OnoVU#LSE}umH%?>16?-%e7h0r z_X58{8OqTvrAxbBpUoOf|5N+0|9SlRz0T&S_v&Pgi1z>Af6v`4``_dc_Vc{Ft8Fa`Z-xY*7tdni~N;f4a4E{6@EXg8$6DK z%~PiKG=eAC;{1mBDX_~6xhp3;Yl>Ky8POl_hyOxIgW!Muwr*!pb78&>JpK-bX`t|r z-Kam2h;fgl$bLWK%L-n@J?{-DCXKI71$gAT569Pt zogY`bcMsL%{j`rhS!ueU4Qf`w+O!G)UNYjWU#D z(~?$I(zLJEr~k>mB>0*8UvAkl%BUp{!cD679sgm8r3P~W&hg3eWhV4Zkma2y-;K2K zm!5m^l01Kph~n>SkY z7t>(jm!JEkPU7<}ve%0I9H-z-(zZ_EIHLK`f^uv~9pLXPm-=?B`0=8BT;NTcTIVJ| zA427Mk)JwFl(%?T`{Mjvc*3)h??fElZc=}w+`mJR=lB{`vu0V^H=u*${lHB_guRER zIX^E2oa|x$v3?79&%A%3Q)!_l@;6*x)WZhel&1L)qUIy`m-THA^jR&}Hw$t(|eM=S>vzuU==_CC{&{KOg!}&yIUDD!w7_f&PXq zKDlm`>Yt1IKzSW>p6x%5YkbHFCLfc$K~6d;2zjtrUEXCt2 z;UVDM{@xJ_Yf1BSWc~}^*rgQw(!Me0b}jDuE7gJIEwGE@%Uj`SFlzn+&hg$&((utv6HYqI@s%Q_z1pU4Hd_o?qqm^@GRltFPGMBG02j zo6yJeTL}D1D~6Qi`I78)jurih+vm~6UQzE+u#OP*)!@AA^JjBkmgC(4oZDlwzxe>! zUKeoo$Ie81Uex#xoZD;Rj$dx@_)qmS1NR|K*l~O(#~HKYhHX6d3|OfB|M7V5!FaXZk}^P^&&;EQ zAM6QZkRkDI9PtBm`~EaxDt6CEy-(uyO7R*YHA%`M-Xn} z{tkS`yk^zq^@AJpm=Ac5>;+q*=5ydd;FYF)HTN;e{t%ykj}~^$o?NrkUVT1J z5S^!cA!ml16)E9#UT>FvlO1NfKcBBFcX)l(PA!p@gYh22A~o{&aPXVUBfe5^t!51Rb6CFMJ?vcX5bhTbY@NJDeg_K4)A-{7 z&U`EMot$3v1iufBxO5Po-wVcio#3xI@WxhtKbl|*KV@Klgr8%~lIpAYS#Ntv_>tek zzWckBU->yk>OboGak;VVp>_*FziF)SOYqBwE7=aht;px`es2Hz+v1W%jTJm{{V#li zres%6ubpOnP zC7(?5sposL#{pd96!tD|xOW79kDdJIY9such4l;HpSpG4M`yKGuBk{#p9OksNLyu< zyKGDqc$7Zqb%EC`H>X^Yl*0PBep%pURJitIQSf5vmaCjQXa8sW!QXDk zjl5ERYOMA%1NR|)l$$v6zuGSZ-i7WLOY!%>*z44Oe)z>SUex=e5hb(vy`$uBey@3? zzk^pVxAF)7^}bQ&JHWRN4{nV0zESn~;0C|G<5mxP->7`hc+KO3Jg(6==tn>HL7vwj zA^ev4G!7ak2zyCCjn96JJIpiB74wKJkO>>Z*FkzU9JQ9 zIaeirx!B?7Wjqsd*+>^W?LH%~lX8*o>>}#%QlsfJqY zgzrO8%GVkv3VV59vfApRkKS!m{x{gCO$N^UM%y>k*EHC1I9x^QC#k?|l7Mo&JT-Cq zwQ|KS(f=}Dn=+JR!RzNfjXRq6Ed8(GdRvp|`EO94nMVktL%|K%(C?cicyFA1Cxh&u zgYaC&ao#g%_^C9VIShw!Z&%@$Jn%l(9{Y;dnMs_b$pR5#a$}oG9j0ZlyF*S_@v)d zj(5HA55JH5qtyB3N^)dJrt~}9o_K$&1>Y^z{W$Xrxj*HAAHs8pAFQ1IvTSDncn;q4-+I@+ zI|chJ%JY>qqT?-JRX$&*yyTK`gguVQ{Y7phj7_j0mwo6zi+EHCDVKk2V zAZN@F_H(%@_^o9nN=oCX4f&KEj!%4Fnb!}aG%Y)`4B6{a+3QxxN8bN}`S7%1puIp| zr%$gH-L93#*PX~!qVhw~$A0>|--t6>X@4{F{uk&sO%--lczNeNwVz0zANnldb>Gq9 z8}4+NCqMiuaOJ$pEyg=O?_N0M%yHI9 z_0EUBB%If!B%W^|j{`~5gx#LO!k>KuXS?z^Kz6Cir*g@z0Q9CnK5Ms-x8pb0f%s&X z6Zt}3Sr4n$m%L6mH~RI@!XecqD?ef?X8HgmbGFKiF=<$!0LA^g#Fd4;WdGcybH zr@)?c@KeCAzi9at-mhUP(r?3gqLJmmU*Ep_2l2|fj@yT1sGai>?|k0p0iSS+M{ZwP zj^_19JfR#P?h~5T`)D<8Khi-*n6I*1GgH`|zgYW247=mic3Z%2+N)QE7*xu3ehCmyxC55MJh59hy@xqR|VYR%|zFI!!oe+ACv&0es{#`U2%SC^L$`5SxF7O@YwJo2Zy zJi@3R0j{S@_#+i5;fkMh4(Yez2VD-XOV5A!>K@|!_-&O;?Th2XYkdXRy20o3khM?N zTVk#HdoSV=?gh^0A=68H?#(ZjKMT0d54<>KD96sLSKgStb!Z9tpX>+$=k^x)T0Q4a zIs9eheiG$Zd>=y9C%^Zjn0zu@P)#bbScIvxGO#CC$u?a$wTVE?M~O|M7wYklZt(H_ajKmJ3xEV(_b z$Y*=r*nYyx`=S&F4&Z#AIQg4;Y4ZM|3pjrlqC{x-eBSpY`7GdkeWlYA?bh=PV+i*F z=Xl8e^yH5Qsl9`YBOX%UonnudaLpWHFUN85U!I=A`$eSR44mV5k+J0tdH+rwFIMoE zel{XUy?;mJjyhf(;8)xF&DTW>$4lh?O!luE{0o~;Zb&Q~FOly|aJ=}y|JA-qU(6UC zU(^pdUZUepuL&V;LXhV%(L7i9OXkx$HU;?HnAS|Fz%#&Szb?;c z|C~I2Sn-}X4|oG!cz+U)AEe)geG0x#{7kWjziP35Bs`$ffA{H{243e8p3VCuh>L~K z&hID7C(VnFi~CbH&XMJLA0Y+2w&Q1or0djr57sU0rz0ztZWq?We%6n1?Al}6Y^_x= zsD2*C;lDBd+zg$B+kxjG?bzBPzt1JXjQ42e!w&)QDmAWEfuA=KrG?i$k#ULpX+HQH z^P4n_b={Po-%g${{PgxmomWWLP4(`&(ev}o=@q+jd1PM(ZI~8J)|v?wcn+73bacf(Tk!ghlR0UYUh)!~*`9 z-W5y7SpP@P`||PKMF;qMZ=O9L^Slp!;`2T?_*4h7U-N6U{X1{`>Xz3#LGXE;+;MjK zGrZm*d6!E5z?_z?q;bq(enZ&L{m51);&T4>Lk@iY4Tjlwe=ViX1f6Mj57vym+ ze~M@i7vw+7t?8HRpM`uLCyYJMkCE%|0PaKDe9*Pucz&liR=0l;JZ;vyb@=;FQhP@3 zFNn1NB4Ph=|IrJvz5`XL{lVWh_N}*KeFuuqeS_MjemKfbTV?vcXa<@xbkpLYkbZGtWQVqPNjTakX< zYW8<*7x~SJe2(WXf0x+9;}zj<;5?qKo!_@9kGF(-f%AJmTa|caBabtL`+@U&KWq2* z4ddtS2oC|bOcd?Y_e$D4em+O>pQZ>KqonjcddpH_&xEgykzt(ln2>KpI?0^>B|nD~ z%Wrn@p6OI|>nuk{sEW4n4kP!RLOQiF}z) z_GLwttIYFH3Ay~a!p?n_;$D~HEppxSyGiS=P?^hg3xf_z`dRv4X-BQ*O<_OpH=J)b zf7;ulCrx4844n5H_Pzh~%=C9kMV`m70_S^#cNROJdnIAdDw3x-Z~*6ilRih(b5wdj zFWZLl3|83Vg50jLudI^nF?f-0KO*eT>Ug6#`z##)!1*~QP4z=1dH+bkbzI-tRG@N< zx!d=}F;0E>8VS|cv<&fpbvf5}@5CQ##;R|K?StH~*Q<=>jzaYbqP-lzQ$8H{1Yh^0 zxJgxAuW^A#bt8FR$MJhp_Z-@Jl9<$cJI3vzkOh24ZJ zai&X>ek*>7+}HGf8wZu==v8*5O8S&~N4~Sm<8Io6jPNrUR6eysWL`x(aQytQan}R= zIY=w?>=QNa<{_WsqD|_XjitCS7~c~1GrsU(%5J$GlU4Zm36DGl?Wo-Upu(FiPMaX# z2biwHH!OQ6U77B~2eo4+aGn>&uAecE@6U|ok8JSEZC)^uuj@ixcsy16pD-G4GT?_? z$aCMx$8U};;?sCzT2T-eR8L1o(SP~*$|tVn1z88-Haur&gWNA|o*FOv*@=Ai^N4np zn-ustPLrvM8@E(G#j_fxdWPqD@c8<=Uy`GE&XayC_0;*U3Ol%so?g4Z!uhuK!{_J} z?@23#-MsI@@wcpJ$zigOxcqEYy;C4hIMrK?Q+{~-XCCe!W?yC^UoI;={xd%;AD5v1 zu23HI9NN`vvCd4T6dcq(ydLLu-`N9)Kh#d`8D-p3cm+ohXZm`uUv1gH#4)KKBkYvIM40i27l1=Uk>GU4@;4LUSC@v z=L3K7uvvjv*H`kD|)FN_&yc> zu6zg6qHf&wazFAw?wRKn_K^Eg4)VDlb*YuvLheUN$-*A4M?fl{>{8=oFZH8*@VFl( ztuE;Q)Q>FEZ@Hd4Zq-=$Q3<}zLO6f_kJq!QE80FT&*v$)&xY~y)s~*+I)~*^UKY|4 zPq-r2X9#y7--oo`#Cz4`^)in~eBaZd`***HGn2L9cF?Cj6YZyo8{b!URmDO2d7sd{ zM)<+kxzlpFepb$JFZ5hlIlmS6JCfG`cObpj)m@R}oZ^-D>4K=g3%ny`kNqAizWIEF z$D=Ip&*<$ncs`Qr&--+K@P0o1%NIQ6QT_Y_MEtV886O@UDchGjQP|CKmQbTeQ8^CH zYXxpa>O1($;et3+?hi(}EFT>D$u(Kt0XY}a=N_;4G20RLAM&%1{?w>f@q&3%S!bx? z+y@@{faLkUL$<$`D{p{ozh<4NKkMH%;Hx97U-85Ld@o&k275VNPUL-!R_Hs~|JWBJ zmk%4m_2Bm@vY+o?EqPz|b0*|CjvHB5OYd{iMegt8e)h{?<084Aah&Hu&-~E*$UYeP zf!l%Q(;A-aE6e9W&iJMCEbd22oJP)rx&F!EWtO!Zq8kqepT%q(1}sIYOAI&4xy^s3FO_ z@jgSw?=|suko#@YJHiiKzqh+}dzJew$)^Bkf9@@s*uo&`&qw)o@J^qfA9-I9`7<5< z;eMY1-kmG`O)>U|3;Evz{{Hz3iWlA=R?ZusKNq~uhL*ll3=Kr}Pwt8HC-fJ);Z_6L ze;iL%;G^p<4axpbSugzK0{+LAQ$ywU4NemJ?cja#@$*|{{d~QT^?z%tFk9B|QR)Aw za?L)n{tVzbNJ}(se46_$*_VX;08;n5#1eciAI5t}+uzHvxrSW7q%2_{%UA7tYnCj} z?}11G@4Xg9Yx6ps^xKio&$(~>=Ir;}PK3LAi1IVQTX?+GQn`IR$mi#r-~OTDTE3=F z^7(8(c%%PnZw+7MSK2s?qum3*OO5>2&Cg)a{I4E2DKu#Q528KuA(!;7@B`uD`Cs}? ze4lFk<>!KlPva-|X-;{KGukU2RldzzJ!a$ORMJJ|m^KJ|xtvlTxud?LY5~sc zQR|=ABJY)=dTjD&Gm6YZ;da`E_lC0qwuvds!x`xKCOp6 z_=oLQaDz`(ADgLWkn67Ck^P^xv!{o@=l!2bU-W~dBdrZ;rsllJ|R_oOs|Xj z^q+7s^}p(4+9>?=@w%+x99vW$KlE9Fueg6cYJC+LE&90w_^}T!m6FFP7xH-?8MwOn zWIpdF{ke$KEbxj?Tbaf41L3Tn{n7dDNs;^N2@k6DzvwvBocDVP=k=jxld!MKy33b& zA6M3Ig&y-!%W=uy1}o&a{)c*QXeH}619u=@_}6f+Y@ZK$UBDY&d+Zf{UYYt6kBOY} z7&?0FkhD<~dP%)Ix_|qi?;Try>AHQ#Hb8voL&)bo(*DM}?-45D_%m%5e&BfB*m*(; z=8``wz}erAz4qp7vOjFV*h5EU{dwoV=h4g%OWId|^ z@7m1TpUU!n$T@&lThQ-c+20&bEPtqzHA|K^Z4vf!KOK0!$NMZ#?O}qmIORD-v`3Gq zQBLt!WPGzhZ`!qqzwS&g?#q$#%o1(%I%Q_oZDmdY*Rz#QhWFqM?b8&?br)) z{|o|Wf6rO_&j|T?hy}PNTiE^ZRQn&~{*{XNR0Q$djcHc%8}j+98FE&nPw8it=lG@i zg}6O{+iJYoQf^Of4{opgV!EjI%z_+`Q=?6%b=)4Z{X9PXoS)n+%6`bR{hQ~OY9`z7 z1Fm^r*uQP$4NWZj{TR2)zjASAl>LyiB8_{c&2-s*7xX)TKWKP;mi#=q7yfYpe{0j2 zEPkGx#%ohH)&)aFng!mi*?o#|>~Xx%x<~odM7bf{uf6`q{jK=^HsaDjeBQ6l0Y3%$UMkUL5#R47*n-dZ^|9V`@ZUTT^7H*~ z%nz^2u+HM^OCG7dN*w6T4MaWpx!;pdU+Km7>5(7R_2Y75*+X%a2mQtmgkS2Ldp}}3 z2v0#ipFfQ>KDAML?zaHP{{6X$&vliq+eg+VD~68vlkChru)19B_HAACzoK93fqq_> z+{rDq@^DGJo$(ytye>IaY2e&JZ|x2*w-k9@060G@-+#5?aPY0N9>^QKBgMST&!5g% zqS+YdAXKbFl0Fo6^L-N^cHZ}w-VuhWeg@m9X!##TYW|FqaJx#r>w`=0$nt#tz~%2; zYjNl#d5=nd$DiF-v3`m-cfKe;2Rtjjqwv>{?T_ibny7>L8t^l~42Se7d+}e>iQ;c z7yj7)^77-w!ckeEllbcTrh-4?%4GD@TraOpp)uO0Qx2JiPr zdp{`&9+j^izXIUx*fQ{-DLGmn@zvu)KKOfz7O|E}D$G}pU&%X!KelZgR;)BHa3MzH za!_@iND%F#=VF|(L!QqMGx1w16;1o-S;(hs>gRkNhv$M#HSRQ@fBC77ge!I>1i|Nh zD_%#OZ#<=wtXt?)N>{!ARpS+Q30%4F?{V>)^)!0WGN1K?#|7~7@CO>^8Fo7 z;QU-#aNzU`yw67RZs2@Wu&r+6Qj+9?U|eP(;S;5WNzug~jHsw*Aj_d@n4`Q&#C z45MLr}V zKhL*9{-=&>zSf0EyU_1JdHnsM^%p$V;v}5UTXMjA^^g5G^%Bnd{m?)B%K7JX!La&p z{qrHm<8SMd4}Oi4aMqvnvG7OZ#AmzdB|P6J>TSfhJ9g9NpX2-m`t6Y8_b)scHP)|} zaMqsz-n(nAFEvPbWd9BNx9=&rT<0s$p949*p4Y$H2V3GKob?C5+udM9mR`awUyAzk z_jm3$*;G2tTcAH_r?8vnzqZBRoT8U-)}I1i`@2KR8YGw&tuX|Ut(>69pcn;%8t6R%7 ziI?=-k)O0n_~H9Axu zO8J;6QmTKTi>N=>Cma00FGn<`y@mNX;PZMT0Dhuva*Hxqh4~g0-}s5J_rawfzbxx6 z%;)<|O^{0gzt#&k50!Hj=Bxdm4t|~dCD$Kw7Urw{?*V^!dh;HSI|}pF{?7$}ZS`LU zC)o<~)&9>1|M@Ye4dtzc`D*_se=7X*Nj2kl6)c7MYX958pMQ4evWn)ye6{~G!GGB1 zmbQ|qFkkKe9PmeOeBtvaqUp-`AEz;^=J`DEiAwXAcaNC2cz(+n|6yx+eoM&__HzHq zt$lS7_b)|WZ^ikT7G1^Mg z1PQkT=kfW+xebzy5}pB^zaRJ5N1y16NVo?$&;RBshsqa~@EqVge}DDSvm@m82>|E$ z_oalp8hL!o2hQ{7#>}M+rS>x3Yc{I%el3XMuixE(mpKRK5# zG*Q-3;SeDI+2Q{T@SYEhn^+3C!up@zM}9GFV0iDH6e)Tl*PU~qr^A6BuU>EK-$Xd+ z;cG^m@;>VDF(cZKdnG+>lrt@IA%^q?p+~bv*uQ1$u4QwYt&O~=#)5odiAHmx|KcN5 z79C`l4LGm+%6F?aGtkDKfe67+%9h5-0w>MvZATnE_@xG$Jv_B=3TiiRK6eb z+^+^)K08S6H@vQ}V_ll{>`UwA`tiDj`_(63^lT%q3oUzvUpVf*>HFFQd0oi*ZQ#Au z$!|0S!|oCONfq-J_sdT%FWs;67vOHlaoqmX&uNg?m8{k^16`qoAwDiwY!HjG58AV$Nu4Q;hok+%gO6T8|1j(Oy0BZ!&vJ^ zCwLbRjQT=eH}blU$CVZ3cHGcs6_oE~{pfdZopML^FR1<9!2L*_63OM1QThK))Y)dEEVJTIc6=?gBgn zoX6b{zHT)wPQp!J2)lXQz1Z#g9eG`C0nYJXzEYPYd0lM-&hh*6v?^GWA9E&uXq0d->hA^bJ4^9CMd2S>7xMj7Zt(ozO)LBBh+-z;N8yd| zx;FBB5RWGz@B>HETJpHVe5!v4!(=#!wFspyxmWImXjExf2h~trh~#i@7!wO)C(c!>IWGDmwo2@9FnO#XsYS|MRu`{S+1dz&ZYBY)c*&GycJ=-lI`p zIsUz$aa^m6>B-D#^e35C3Qm3qMS0yt7WM_{~849vP=R80RmTUu}@H|3AjA z1U{zgZBHhXWFoyPTgM#*v?Qx;z~x=Vvx>&d)z8tknn0Pu+20 z|ChVUT#@tB26-d!Q}31hQqE7FpYyuRyi&I1^7UdHiqJioOn@^`-ZpMG+F zx**T_8P%`AQ#n69z}dfHE9>5q^D`Sb`?pK`(XYz+smsXU|4&cyjt!QdM(~=S?$|U~ zej1UV7Vzd&wH^wVpUQO<8~CO+2_FQ@PY2rX1h4q;9rJ_bXD0G<;mFUf%k%qe){p#r z;n=ZTUbi&-fa4>s+qPR}*dphj@w@!~sru|U-~BIn$2SY($iLdBkM)!D&jy_H@3&F) zV}j+M1H6Tw7EhG(Pls|B_NJtZzVCnK)t|gpw2#k!mf!lbtGsS*SL9d7#_#IN`J?+@ z$aDUjk2{bi=Z_IM=g*#7=Lg97V__Wqv(~Rq;)CUn4ZNM!0o#M+j}H0c0Izo6t(}AA zk8<741%63Y=fq(7lMTOl!CPDCaGPNHW5W9Phd(#|G2i*w3E>|-@+anwE?Qm}kLUb> z{Y_pUc0$e%8|3-Efzrh)ZjkfC0i5%rX!p+hg5`$`yxmi(mzDFwf^rY`4-X&cE$0W1 zPrNQ2QD(PE9-nk45r5e6ymI9pa)#_mm zmLCrA7999HGFX1_`Kt@O8#O;15G+5G>%boH&lf#p4wfHA;Hp!?52h+LW(3QR6y(Ri z&}}oroYL_Rayh_1+FkREd|k!C`GN7_-t0~n^2ML!;hzz&WV8z!fAC^H`?HE1e;dj@ z*iSYt%Qt_rVf^Ivg(bJ%D=A->ax3Ed`{9XtIex|;gkSjl=$9%7Q-j6N0^a<&?dAlF zAFof?z$-iDmp#Gar(E}UfL~(CH<`iWr{nfvzqy;GsvJMgf4=VXN}=V;Lq+&hG(Xp! z7WVP_!B$IWw|xH3>kn}_k28mMP>0~W!9Tx;Jg>j)k8g5FE#Wrce10~h$*~2Y67B%b z^IJ#g1NX z`Qv4TJudL-7noLv^Mc~R@7c&gzdL@Q*t?O^@zM)9)sMpN#QklT%K2hIIong>qwOo? z^^R=hnHjtxD-#RK>)=+D^LRf)vv{Pu4xWvEY6tJwo$Hr)9h};41nvYr@7H6`ic0Nw zvwn;hXT~({SWLpRaUAf1S0ipyvsWZs2V8YV*uQyPpD&9`xB=xnp0_biUQt5AJvg44 z!5jXtL;I34j`@}q_|V5CPx{`g;SV9%XGb~DH#YRW_E9MbxA1%qyz!|kuE$8Yk>~rs zSL}M@NNEZ8qMYZ;D|9^%m6324pYQx6?Eky9w|!X&x8Z!$0Q@&g%$RZ#ZbmtuPgZ#N zPxtZ??!tP26}%RPZ^H}{ZsGMT;E|8_UauhGPL%U{O!-p%KdUI=F08k?!E0o%^KB&w zPr>yJFYuIlzs|1=JXn8I{Ve>jX}f!5m2B>5Vo!YKcx(XQG%F$gRc|0)dHl72KX_Qg zo~k%+WGT|GoX^?8KcDnue5{+9Vo!YK`GX7mJ{g{vYOX-O@_g6}e$|un->&Wq3=u)&Zw%6*Ynf;_lGI3gA;|WkLz)LG8^)S^TH2=`^ImzN&4*@ z$JA*h#r1N&5AWiY!WB3C{gmh`U!F!JfY0}LI5A#7-Cks!7!CbY|9@1!S#fn8Sw0>(e@A?L{nXs=c2fO%;7QoOe=p`@INC@3T6v#e3V0Wbu8QI3N!Vj_ zpP$lSgwcI|>98{$@;uke!f*B&@##K4)rGt`Q#&0u#d?5utk}=X-V_&VAU5TRT4OIO z$`df3@BIDp8+_k6$y=e1kDrA84*1UkevxlKY98$Uy;kHs-{)@!pY)Qy`F&;V@4N1%S0sP?mO4Z~ z^xp{YlR47)#?iWmX8Z>EFx4H=9**aZ2XmrBErbgHWurdbC1IBt{6CU5j^O*(1>4Wh zy>FQPXM~*nhl7>FpqKfS4<6{Zf;aV2S9^H8U=Z#=IiFv>*Q3D92npwT41Z^6{)8UO zL#%o7$yvfa5A;0mX=|=d$iq1wSoW-rUnsr>aG*Oeh*2(r7z4`6^Vq56nvb{Rs7VMv2+>{v1-fXnr2Hw2V zJMF>j^?>I9@8ITN>K2sZ>qa?`N8yzpeo+WGjTg$}rx*MytylhCIF3gOv6sgeK7OjM z341HdE8baW3gjz~pGNS_p`Bk8i4Ei{kDpfXmp2-EyQn^puRMM_z(0Sx^u}V^!1tx{ z@iRnHMe`sRjyrD1^E@aUzhyqngS6L$-K2){ir+KLoi`o~*U%x87HS$4w?akMnWhCu6^)d-c^C12gmV=f(l^sC4jer_8P! zrVHe=U-><>S>Ts^vTRAX!ml(Rw=3o)`WyNE!|x$x|GYo)wQD?&BmX6U&wi?1|Ld8d z$UnmQJ;W@(ymg#D6n-H*jpZ@VtafQ!9gT!11JA(zd{(n<@_UH+J;Sk2#Bt=*)aprc z`?NRn_v@28t6q`Ymj%7C;EjA-*c*=aQ@>HhHx9hwi%MVoulEddd=tR$a%u4LmwC@{ z3iy9)?YIAB-ZPv5{?pgjEDiRaVUDld52)Y7!R{Q$bH9nbCHy7xso$7UP8mmelT$$W zn|VA>B%I#AY6m|hEI*I=yeB?yzIwu)`RehF`)!0gf8Q-}(Yzxp>&qXFt$Kd_Rnn&B z-WE>zl?8p;+rqB*s&C1Ck0#-*~cT24z|5{E6Fj*Mr0_Tp7O<@EhM;ULr{R0@e{Tz~3=)VZ$Kt3s^_Y z0Y7HNYi)wWFI*YF*t^2sf1-x23KG9?W&Gm7FW>IMogncGxGysq{KU%bswv|~>mSPa ziMWNTVqr%*6R+&7M>RlkaM3%>6-kK+rk3muGoaUjG%s5n1P#&KMAUmVYke~SJ* zd+(=})n;PlZIrjl)0{`Hlk;7l+xbFr3 zwZ`wn1Uv4#6~}$uZ~6SC$u1`B=kqsokHdufWdG;;x%%}RJ7yq}e4B5a&3&FF z8Tv=|TU4t}^i}^tGT|&fTGroB1fN_-LN0#>h&r}IKso1D-6DOaj%6K+#cZk3z z?^^JKvDD6uz}31xguRy*RrWtJ^X8|EpY45h-Aa}>0_XQqZ2hCf+aG&-RAbx%oZm}v zu6N0!m&ba0v3?tHzj9yUJJs4%tup1oNZ^_rooE;P+cxEDW5Q^o=>}QSmMZ@p=F{w0K2jav1i@(3&0>9*gjkW0AbDTe9 zHyt09{gcY6-zT6ycp#sN_w#EX1n>6-lneR1^=bK8kPbT_JD5c)jn($4@n}RGY|uEpQj)?#2JHIZVP?p1<2#cyZB^vb+a!+1TIN zQ9~CFc{&~_*C%ujg&%4Z9yB^aFWSNX6Q9qc*?uGVD>gjruT|JjabWvpzfc?;Xpa^0 zJpMZHTjtaFn}%}X7vJ~A72|K_o1)!>Q@u)@%BkKg=rLJEzu|hdkN!veQBLyy{)q1` zb3S&@2~Fj;QoL=7c3Bnj{5@-yUsL$umwEDPjY^ZhKR;PhJYRoyLm&62ao1ne<^DwR z;qO_qelPfcp1fa7O-4u?+2iE)Jr?$_snxXw`-J?cw1>pWk9NozA;&Tn{AQboPw`7Y zIsNw4t4?=|y!RhSd}WX4v{`dz@yxdg_t_DV20q)t*PrGzEO$)SO?>jZL*e%fsXp=x zzek$&@%0MVvunA}Q<5&)$Zn-RDkr;hpjZDy_=~^K5{KV%+sJM!%1NI5t-^O`cs;$^ z#cFlr;|uP`hty}+J>uOH$z1ZK=eD>ad&aW{Z>HZXU z?k|@-nU70k3vCo99uN3>pBemwiT_%H&97aG@z4f7=_CJSj2HRO{(12F#c$+wD>wM; zr=wN9o8)yX58iXk@-<6kKjHHZzyJRd_V9U6v$U-id0ov5{RZ$h=bY3BTURq94s}+y zZXmbM3OVkd-6p6i$n7%&w_`tG)9N&ycT=7!gWs<0^OgTO z-{$MT;P(iP-u++mZH})YNBGa$FZyb*`8LN_?g!Lwobam!@;qMH@muCozezzk=LLVi zi{B&USbi;zWhkzEpJFED>LuvU@pwmg4$9q_58kdfIfC0jnD>A5<~v72C7kQe0B^(OcfQd` zxU;rs7hm@-yR!PGP-~uk?K9}ddG`KVw#|IKpW2@Vy|Lh}Ker?{OwykWJPvrL*oQ;I z?RokWfF}SynGpYLghSvoZpHz(*A(qc2Jhm}PEU~c!9}E16TA%U)4(@R>aL;p!EwB) z2GXAl9v?R|!QWa*d%J)&ke>iPKgXo~NBAf9nr%sxC6FJ-?ZJC&OyCdF&n*;f4&BMItoa5CUEXg4_wysQ4*d5ocqIf1zoM8C0zfnu!q;J?tj<3eL)E~ z0q6Ugc6gKf6_W6H#?fDA%^usWu!JWuj{bJDUuBI>!c&0rakIzGPkt$qhlhC3Pk0?< zK-;bRfB3t#e{SsaZ%8KOc^zcw>d~j$g(s|r|3h-PeyoG^jcWVh$1QgG-%;a}SLpTl) zlyB2NbyzlVbq;X0?@^n{y?=Tyb`#6%RTEAu9IaBZeOZGNPYil}-A|00fU|ug&b*kr z|3r+F^~VFRL*S&pz>bdR1pXqP1FI!<>z2b{D4frrMhVc~E5BnN?apQO0%=NPv zPY2HSO?}dE^WhZ-{D*LgUnbX&_*GuE>*7sKw3ZN1){&3F>)hkYdy z!#}(@xgS=-8i8yvhXzP*Q>QCTd{GJtl4&~Kz#e0W(2=&_^ z77uwIzic4|mS`lLze|$@p3U&b#V`ry_pI=9EEC@7dpgwZS5N*8ONShffBikXH)$lC z=L4DGg?4?qE=!e^d~`%$KQ@0KN+Zz@Oa=U*jK99BRWjdp98znfp5Qicw4wTPk##VOyI8Y zgM}hw|Dv47?~BvdnC17paD3Q*?JR#bm;Gnb2>)>Xt6Cql%Js(s=kv0GwJ)bfNbO_& zCbZ-0Kdycu`!5CZDZm@{JU&RaKb`gC_))iW@sGnL|6~H^V-E8NrVSzwZ}`tD?{@ znV*F5$%%0?8T`g^+KbUnW{N%OPr-Pu13w-7Vzbx=pT^?Pms3T9G zaz3gL7k=p2d-GSt?5rt|ubj`Bz&~7bY57-d`R7m6Ugdl)0sL)O7xpf04dg55b1C3A za+dq5ge8!#oX=%|-+k$X_e+`s`O5a^fL~#9%w)YWkgsfiY=rR7(bVOWOBn+B%J#>D zf4H~jQH(B-uWWxZ_@`RmD_+{?_7LAc-sn6~IUgmA=Be?R=cPkF3wy%pd{d+~2zR2K*Qds}-7+@RAZqmKd+ML?`F`@A=OZl= z#|(aFaQ{Jr$JB0-kT`7M;MyGqk4s1#$ z+S-D*V*iTS(Gs2jc^7!w@6UXrpoDu+&i?B5?vkZ+en=a|NBMovZ17t(`8SNt3+0X4 z>xN%+QNkbhZKdAU83c>`&x`TAuMP$OkN*cJ*+%pq)qh;x$C-R`6bCEnAvF{S7k+P_ zdaFHDtEgQZ2RHByqZ9T9i$f;xw(fnWg2f>R_;(w!TFG(HM+j)0>=@YH^m`NC;XJushR)Y5h|DaLp<;|Q^)KH76%*f6;sS_1&f0N_|vLieJ{ts zg>sI=^ub%&28)9SygM&WHI(C!jdG5|s7GUq|5qGzMTDL8I((KHEDo9QixIr_&r|xo zVjypbL0_Sut)D~>mGd{WL=?BEYt9aFl5P@DTd&HDo8EB<sP_;#!V^1LV>@|R{zok!OZ<@N;QCxgH9PNmV|KFu0sAh^=7UC2S z`DE+~_vNM9DgE}3FLOC&hh7)<^9$MvQrzT?^z-$3=Nj}|@FyPr>H8?f{W=sMBl;EJucRv> z>?OSvSEu6s6e{=C6RvERW1XmP;F$^Sg0w65J|b>c66$$-YkfVnOWyqL!g*LEfHXzB zGVxo^!#Guh%8YWW0%sndck(_*(#vh|nB;d4xbEu7WT#m z!Vaxo*vD-kJ{>0vD5u|Kmoom!>(fT%`Ls`tu1{MP`nevCi(P?JeZ2YF5tgE8heeU6 zdW_Q~L;i8{?+?W|++$8+P5C|yZ7IZaiooj~Xl&NRi5f{h7C0Xt>I`^LiSGlUe7EEN z2~$hqzc}z`U*6j$+`sz4trz{nggoK<{1U+LarwIe5wUq(`iu1QxRBmV=uZJZBDBUe z?MvL3mjQm~D3vEt(a$MA*nb=cQLpd*IQTgS^4u?CV}j?08RaBTe&hR___?;PYJIsS z6yp+&NBkU*Dn|I7?_XLL_1y-wk+kG(#OM24?5M|y{fWcF&Ig-!u-|yz;Q_zg{IN@D z-XU+KpT|eOzeQDA*m=73@khb#U$QCk&Imr~CHwjQCAPoe^J_=s`-AM@b6%aVv#X$- zmwf*c%fElzeM7!~$<6Y}?|R2Bf5!6#f8GQ4V&5$1*gno%!uh$t6s%i0!b&!g+h-^v z?C1H&yMsTuF1Jqw+>HHOB|6NK?_W~J*9zYDYG+>iultuczIN98*R|#^bN`YH{8txG zx%V>nFL}ZLW%G#E!R}w;_$vE_75>zf75?FVVa9KnPvd4h$~iCi`VoI;wpYi$ztA8V zDK3ojcTa1F&b=q&nHWF#dD~4J8;Z#}@-FRjF-~Nn-W=oP@@h$c4$5P<3100_h7FYU zCruT{YkfIk-)~u8Hx85J(;;sH{&e8+do(YnjoP0AJRbOa%U^Ls2-t`F)>#$v^(63E zp05wFf4W4Kds}W_I{2*r$j2S)<>~jm{{}dJm$rD~AU97VsC}%T{rhKuY8_?$`trhV z6Z9_If?O&z_DKvC~93A1^Y&?|kafK%O%p9R7HD?Sh{J-u>@9)e7Xs z%lEw&;IRhbm%TTO=xCl#8?`qM<*J!N&l~SgkB=6xAGf2N^-nf8EiUU%hI|I{*7am& zA6b7A+Qs<%=!V_pcyK&3py$`NZ6?X_$U?bcmT2GZ^=aqje8{wla+bfXP`V`rs&UMr8j=Wai;oJ$@$xty}ENpc|6co6z$^i;M|gGGv)Th0%!jZDEsLL zaz1CF{y6ZK9s2Qt9AEYyxBsgao94*=WB;Tt5$(TO?bx{xDSy(Sm+kA-w)J$m{mI-u z?8lBe&|UUVmO@@%?#NWxKN)j{f0ALxw?|Tcm+gzKB>cneSbe+w>U{A5&hdLYtN2~n zz69Xh{vtP5AD7#gGEdZ>fck43QJ0YYp9XpM&(UeE+RN?B0M35w_4M^ia{Kgy^6P&x zwEF>BzcyOn9N%tLesSl^-^#*%&hG|K${mvBxl>M0ne`Eqr7~N{E9Peb{IlwoVZgiFN zRbNHe>s~0@{i1i8rjV46TF9Hg+pF)>sxWY0-ah5F@Sbf*9Mf;ynDK-COrKwJpZ80G zp6X-9*sFd#?iV8XaE%k?+!yXAn({rj?*`6!(W8gq9&^d>@xZ;vnNOGKyhk|? zp{CLNBn5J+s=_Y@>z)eyV)e>HyTfUU_8&Gb=e&Rpl3dqkZdeLq>@O>dGhK9pF>KDrA5uMNi0?*M9sCupi|lPkG`}=rv*d6nNfoh3`i?Z9d0`H=q9lk1OoIrCkdTmFtGSFfZ3% zTiCn(PU`n;FXgonv@D*fb;W|NB$ntP=5a12AtQkCRnS!%k#uw?R9`3 z^2bmO&u6Kvw2|MH{-JWpJ2&ibL7tz>^s+u8VxzpvK{*xq+L4=g=}wU^cDvYLUD2)< z`-9~vPO4h@`=hCj@E>s~?`%;5=lHY#&Tgu;I#}Luy~)sHJkevdvR<-ZSufS+KaN4p zg+15n#cw(Ge)~}_?PL8czwXSgcYbTuArW{;>}$dvexBq)*?TST?N7YS zcpPxPU;nks%k7=c?|*~!Cje*r_YL`F`t`m)&SUvx;B3DttxoA75KIu+n>Z_CwBEum8oB40e`u8`sNkjYwHTTfBmNBan3*L z=O&bM9-lAvY!HtF{`xTAvtXXc&slC8m)MSTM6^^Kui~LE3HvIauQ|ZuMlgN+-iMp& zcXQ97WPNGSlY#x$i>o%5$C)hT3;QDnysba3cob}$iBse^)#dMJ(4()1{J{E49Dd8T zQa`hzoa8C*+_&?O3sFzk3|rF7b%$|th?ob@c|K(yl|5|vzN_$-p8k8EC@-*G0Q|e5hQtZ<(^SCT!sP-6KT%xc+%b z!)opS=9_J--wb)Kf7XmG@1H$0!mp0nX9dpvHuaZ_5ucsjxs~nFi+sxKCoYjyiF0{k^k6!_D_w55w;Ks&$S=&E#L0ZT`l2Gl-sfIQFed*PzleqA9&pI0xdPb zLwxH{9CP0D*w%l**zscqsr(!DQy*7sCSh-%65mcfe(8^7D)ix+Sd{bgtnMFsLO{fs z<79_FE?idqD#s}f@(I{Ketx|O$BF!ujB<|8+iNE~IX;B*`v+P79^*IDxoaz0+Yv8&OS5qWtM&i&F0KWg6;e(3&cZMW8(YpVYbYL6AXSnx_mK3fq9 z9^vsQcjG!;gKHf>C?MfUz_~qrhuwHHO2SiE9@ljnUW_O~&r#Dx$3t#!?zqGH^et29 z`DuBR`8@7qf`7Z9Nxz97A0x(Z&fmD*V!S3kyNA?A93c!Y^r%oA{#6 zuPjG?aig5a*Y3Nkm6E@&;bk2Cu+ohoi`8+|dJ$JuV_`2J-!IzR_2G3?I)3nV2^Z!G z2Jk=qXJF@G-_x-77VYKxP0Zk1YyaMX*1cr=NI$RpGT#RNvV(mR!hL7*O1`_7(C>g< zPVlch>DMhno1ag4nT@=(g6{#J>?gmcw9fBeWx1hAzI@PR_Z55-%G1LZuax6qK{?wK zR;&G;5MR4!qj=eX^E!lQas9=#F3PwAcuqf2k8ADIN}&?&0`A85L@G3`xy^r zS^wnJ33**Rn{nhr)U6+%xhwF~HZ$-rAwa*Bg$L%`0rTetNX&hAMiv|1& ziQcqGlhDKe6JMDxHt^qiT)|NwHh(;cugn)G_*ZU)M@9waOSm#$Jm8P1Fh48W=QlaO zC?7aqEERPdY1Ed0ag3r75w`81Bip&W6|onP4diSgv3ablSVH|l;$IQ4^M@GWVG zyG85`(_X*Alg-^SVSDjz;uxIc!E@0V`1Z5D##F6B`?_&lzhc{Zh|TEhAMo+R+fUmN`!pI4AP-#^0g zG5@BA$mb>LkmEeueC_)KVFqCa$+P}U@b3QeX5VlL*S5iV4f@HX&^~0O^h3S ze@Y5?d-`>GB~tQd3hK)M9@1Xdwg7OdPnlm?;I-YSdMnDnHHkg(mHDM@A^ef!eS1Q* zE|9OxFBAC2CS4Bmv6H3z$4y0k5k~#Y1UnK~9@i67@SF3I_|(r_D5u|)w@!uLlppiv zLq6H3oa?;jzA~WyAX4GqeDTfguez4P?!7HWWJD%pS0@6+pX07i5&dLU=^y5Yz%PVn zjT7}U{>JbsWx4Hy$3t%t_G8RBSv*nn;p(IWq4&kL-wu-8sMEzhTD7;iZ^ZJ~ACe9^ zUUzs}@M$gm+3*RBX9DMShaK;FHk|L>&wu(u`g4G{A_3pF_osW$5*ie>(BFi|56fSF zzmW^im1_1|2jC&5R>+5*g17T{m2Oia{yo5WJaDexYUp>r&DMu|S$`7n)>PozF5UmP zMS<;)s?y&+d!O<(c;0i$jY@2TC*|7rA30!9f8z7zYjAN;YO76d*?>(a>Yj>ID}h(bN~4LqN)~;7d~9g>uH?VWom|wuJPrk z^Qq-NJjB8B$g6taH{USty)PCs?gGwv^=O0odi&jNd7WJC0q$S;_6co>vNhXOWPyd` zWq*5y<&V#~*X|YO;{$PNBYUz&iu~5a34hc`E8Q!?;D`OV8RhQbLSOliIxjd5G>&GY zJr>kw1%GQ!^%cSVZv)>B-jqK_oGmE%*M;)TRia%#PyhLGAqn>Ycf2RsGq==*?tH#V z?+-Si-ur$F|SsR!-Vgbe=bGygb9#}PO9a(n6gi_7aizLv=I zCp!Pi0sq17BRhEBPI4=*h@;q;G;kV4Ec~J(+ zDPR14*em)iUx#{@ICup23&OP>gx%T`A|Jj|oll7*Vc$mi=vB!*BG%Cp`$=t;mnS<*}6fm8ZT?KI&1ES!&{YCpNkwo^N;ighTDLOw+;+L<&> zj4KuEf0ZepSHuF>brk-XestJGU#0$y>NlcXh3f?SY%81caf5Kqb2qMAG&pGeLM_SL zAkXXhrQExEg-W;uxC8q)ej1-HA8(v^&Y0IdtIs{uh_AEw>enQjM4Z_tLwn7R6Rj6{ zkPW@upT<727Lm`}be)9VeBRae%y*6D^EM-JKE8kb-5q1T^ET+WfVcPhCM!QjO#O}5 zZP|Y|@an(y;!XCW++G*^1H3;RAtU(sO8!m?7x83&B;THHll`GwXMONz&J_>f5^WE#q}}|c(*pa-;n2VY`;GqigoL3@R#=f{URT8nNR&#*}n** z@hKbq%+Oi*lfNTi!Eeq-;?ww)fN~)p_}niaPxdE{n<~o^pZd9~PX0Vklk`zPFyi?d zzTct4;PSce@gckUxj0@A`S1FC{Tll9?+E+0s5%tq@s08@8Q=Bde$y-D#ss-v+q#PO zCP4n=i%l;$zSN#H#rt5B!Ryv+;Z=U_g>0vd_{!(D)4)H`Aic7GawMp^eC2c7nc&y& z((f6M^DIL8mCtQ!y9m3VUpZ|kz(nlH{y69}ffq94S~<=i!V^%={lwv1|0kap1dB&9 z_y@O_ydP}+KpB5(3guxY;*L9%iGQiYc!Q$Sb}d)%~f6o4|eJ|3>jU z-6i%-{~C6L=M!Y7r7Ol0j2E+~{M=HD`3l*|&xPxt*9Lz75#F|uu~OrFf69L0`=K1* zADMZ#LIK};r@RrLpWn>HeOqquPez@NRX*QN{h95R`xyDr2)S(R*^h>Ig?%!g{AfZs zwTJxZi4gu_p7Ob9B~EhG9#?_ z2qW-V$lLJy)RK;lf+}vksGRu9@5(vAukf1dXrb(Y^R(ROiTS%%I^YN!0$g{Pxqp(K)&+3a(3`HPN~?a zm@|;C{H~k}{2hH}|N4p}kk8-a(sdN^^MXHeSc{*F+XMMZ|Lfv~y=~sv(XfOqkk8Ni zvj5HCkB{u~Z%Jz)U+I4v`1|i^AL%WDe5L=L;CH#UzHcdWAYbW!5BSRutsWd>4CE{Q zuj(P}?R(9$t+XMKuk^nW{Q5=yeOg8r$XEK`3jR+m`fsHNd*mKKAPvrGR}MknD`;2z+%y))k^BH?!6{2t-sTO(@~m2f9;eh=`>kpl`AlW;e1evfa_ zt2w^!VdjlTUf}#5-aShf-z+ZSs$Q`FsIafso?E?3NVowwzh^kCUAYA%CEN_0-xFNt zt9c{z5^e>~@A*BSJvpS5gxi7h{ZXSYTy78};ZERueS7=W7w?poa5v+azxQf%>PQ(0 z_cD&-@jER%=gLaBs<*J8=OqWrEp?R3!$T|wguP`W zXQ@VoKV;m^^>-5Od~R-9>9bq6{$c%I;B~0LxAlLljr?HSzz6iVum6Oo-1+VE{7|4) zgKJNd7&r70{$cwvKQew$E#%Sy#?8RlzO_&GH~F>s&f&n-R^V*k7ytGt^8A<8vsvB_ zoUdcN`P4bPLWdvxGbU=Elk10lquYUndK(0_XMmqASz)ZTqlD?tSZa;C_WZrIo(^^IOfn zSpO*o*=IkLKR?%{wamKVJmf!RA>7USVc&(1=AYYj^63n2pBFgW_uAE7En4qh))Kf{ zWfk_beG^i0%Fi);+L7fAz}de2mVQI#ZmLs>aWinXPuum|*vuUp{HH#YpH|=vNWixZ zek*2Jc6!JN`kUIXJDlIXwH2CL_SH;n#JH37!@ib@t2%$5vU)q?Zs2U6?fbR$_Sf$8 zCvdeFINSHh#T|V@_g`Gk@~ZyAeztGnvdgO?LS*I3qX2JU~c zzOT^pTeBj)5)S)j7Q#Na!oGRKrc7%+@yvb3?W`a6eIJw5yHMFeg6A}8N15sbNiPUINLXH(>tl}Z>g(c{i*@z|LA|A*UJ_wHg{2F;A#W# zhE(9&4xejw&RJ+@I{odB-;w-GqS%<)jN5^;eSc0E zyw_xz^c=X_37qX~KX1X$g`VqjPdQYk*U|eBNgnRA`0D7Fe%wknq={dX4Lh+&s`h1)5`@t6~YhJzl9f&l@C7vsBKUBiqDCha*sSveABjH@H7rbL* zrW_9gPW4vvM^vSnoLqO1%92;FB~JL+Fj&}o=+vruY6&-?oae0rDpoEYD&bsjJb3Q2 z&%V}3IDbFGf&TNfc)zzp&3W~wK#u3VMPmvU(nvV#PY18p+MgGNNjUp0>5Q=Be8${dw zg-N&xcoO!@Ke>D;T+*M3_N4%?SboyS5t4mLz|(;j-W8InwdB>W0-g!HeC4xWM_Tjn zWaL8*@SFFCZz*8Q!*#&*Lxuexhs~KEWzWM?(0@$8`*iv}G1`%b$D^Fj8)lq~o?B4D zx&L!NT=U7%q1+E?d`W>k*Z;<^A4SRarvvBn4*U8-UqwspWBuIUBG+fH=Ke1h*LD%#D)#!}_^j9jMXO!2OE!$3vd|-(Y-ZCE5Q;!1=tVNV{gw z3P|x`{qcxn#+cSO-W#qlH;EVoX?w9Z=cyV(vlY+)}IdjUC!?MQSLwb zVZ#0t=$|z8UI{t>Ou+d%()4#r4Cha{oz!d=l_RvyU~C^FM|4A>#jCuOgf%AErq0jo>S_zK_o{9bVW%IT~O6|*me{z89PF9~&K=MxtaQ$%Mhc(|i zJ4H$HF#$ILFIr{$q-a}S`!bPV@xXW4r}r;t&%={|CjpO7`{18K4uR7;t^xha?GfWk z3V7-@n?@Ce9t_?7bz(D)^D6Mu!T&ts=gm5_OXgcKFS3K51^%pmo-HZ@J7vBd^GGxJ z`uBuiW}GXZToitj`A*Ecxjk{`elH`<>4p|7gtX9o!!3zXqH)Yext>f4ko1YI$8=e2iEp<#k*W zc&n!VFyEjGtY5i~7!Q8C&qB{u$X4Z(p!h4-5tG5Mur6g&MQ`bvKNI}ZKXy1(%@)X4`d>Rr*t<4i+?&;{fqbR^P2fKc zpLD*4C6KT5e**X$4>dbc(;UcG`acEyu6t(fu4N45EB&7V{$ILUU+MoG@MDi% z+*d~z$XEJ5Hc|Lz@5ZQlzUJi1XS%MVT*viMRJ6Y9#`>671w!Pgl1c#^zBJ2b>+H*M4(mGv5I!rnpG(x<2e zE%$%_b#g_$LXYpX6LN9bhe9d|zqy@MOxM*MD5u|Kj~#mX`lPqCxXwg4)yuf7hpy*& zpvO{9@VVaX|52}Yw6Krs%~aT9!ut>f?z<0Tw$Ph1OZdCz+pk)=4K$u6Kp$Tpzti!+ z`)UJ8lU=^&MAr!UWblqI{&6hdmqT$kScG0jCvm?=8hHP#n^-XnaT416@ydO!h_CBs zfZzMv%!c7i#GdNs`A`mck@sK!D?-AP=7{$3{Y^haUHeS7FZo^3uDCJ6Z`)>nlgvIQ z{h5$w|4b-RVyi5l0J&uBZAaRE=U=4owSnYgQJ#kVlj~_VzRvH%bKfs^h&}ly1NNnZ_tS27LB6kn@Yt@%8}K$+r~JWs2)A_0AHVj0RqMk2+Alv&_$L|i zRXi!RLd*oftGm_VL&tLzHF1q1z{mBaXWvO8oWO-iqNCWT4@V=$x{LDbP zZLsJkGn=|MNcj=w=pyRR0`EqF3U1jy+VR4^xY0u1KKl75{zX`ykE#6$kc(yBCkBgu zkrQ|p{2m9qP>C76q7fe&mz3iNK{TGlp}!?SE*X2m{o}v%o7$mr2s`+^Z1_KyPKH>C zE!yb;pUsQerGFPrt_ylRwVOpN>-I_uX>5cdDwr1n(#IdscT(Qfu%jYc1r zRh#qlTOh~BQT4@obwVZF2;7FfsoJ)K@^k7Qw9f&2^T)sUim>MCw*hwn&#HWNhZZ;; zCv13rj_;T8fOq-Z!z&`;2cb5U?OAt>{L zPd_O?T>J9p?_kT^X>$G=CklJn|C8U_T#fzjlh-7?q0m3C{9#n(*KdP7_urY94t*#0 zUk7l`-x5DxZmhNn4gU54=lr`_bn22&3HLCL>%p%N(-`Fbkrzs)=6AItq$H%ZvX z`J1!gwPUjV7RVdHYmqu)QKVGAWuG{%asQmScg{|^ejDT*$g`>KDvgx$+X38yJkQ!( z`76o4x$hfc|3&rQ_MPk>?*EKOo~_kN_D?qS^Z4>jW=sPwn?0{$B7(Hkj!NmcKgW=a>ssPs-!J@k3$14Y;mvz1{i7Z$7@Ff1OVs zW0v#N26^sZ|K{wC2(^k9`u)q}KX_#e#@)!5e<*ihKlIM+q|2FVS zs|NKB4-#MH@xTH8?HZ|1*={+$I&L5K_n$XP<2)ey`F%!wd@SGXbiEKLAY3;!e|}e3 zzr(IJ3j*QXKe+#Sqi1ywLAwdJK%V>G%-5#RRZF-HIQzdu#Sd16N;vmV2Y6Et&yCSY zILmYXJax`HD9gJb=fS?!YR!Z&$Wwn&9*?uZt2K7u7d#FLYsK-<2wZ0ue)-8(@)7%; z>@~C($2$++cdBhxz<>TlItaHyPKUg1v2I)2eB&)}JN7G9|8`4`mlNe|?s$k=1Hu$6aR9INd7|2)Vk72s-+j8f?FJCbP@|EqefPZq*5BGz8|4^rx zU)sUHQT2YR|7C_!6?9&uoX-(V^E@5qDK5x+u_v6)t8%2@lqae-B9Hm~Jl{4|RguSq z*crl3&lbUJ_my_Oe104UJg0@gH?O%nDO5+biGIM>lM}#O8`-WApZ8P!uJuBW^Ze(F z_CI8Ketsei@+Hz1YQiP`$tcgjex)tC7e6=Qi*vyD7qh@CepM6C=gFeA!ha^kJXt$a z*w6Ox`?$EiDbeLhO7#VNPcRyRMscz300XOmxO(q)DDWHTly`>k)Lb1 zKcM9gQXDnza>CDCc0@aRcb?t8<0JIxW(j)}b6RG~aW z`5cTF{EMsV4G!{rRKWKOb+d(ECbyirEQ%FlPyH@lkvC@Wi9-J2ykYzAyr#BA7=!{E zj{@w6{1M&PZ}InS1Y4}DCF8jvUMF*b-}lObPk4Pt<_Fjh{`3Q(4|%;u=Ew1KNmzf? z%@OvGdNl5i(tgTgrTwIf{9;2rX2{#HC!F#)S^7=eq;eJ`ppr&qvKgq9$z^>vVmXc$4#9JB2QR~ z^efxz1i!DNZi7PpyT+L<^2dtydca#4R_tbB@JOGsf2$SlYpJm^Bh#*?$b+ zH!fZ0`yzT~iaqg_{o4Y5k8c*F7S-nG(>TWcTOODE*YD5|?U3j3&xPMIpT@Balv52f zZWvz6f86KsN#MTwp(cv)F$M4Sdb>>4bNRR*yHNNgWuVaW&$R8UxDC{9rGC;&?bbpr z4twV=A)kQX%68jPj&|jKhntTzb^h&DU$yty9HBon!VNypTlqNnL6|f5{gT9`jr?F% z_`#dMJ`H~dl%E?Owji9Vrtv-Z{c|r@pKrZrk?@-Z`-jUnWXXQDqnzixSHCZEjOV>n zpB>|x6MO!yz{%!uugSg>_Nl|1(C5bfi_~$Wd7hn5AI4+;4ne&=EnfuFmkm9-#lnsl z_0_(7y)~FW%;0_f%{!ID{a(-ekMcz6e?lowbg0J)dH!C31Ha|AQGTbPoaFuat<9g` zygpAjy$3Z5eC2bete5x1=gn77xYi-;rZTE0D=dFKPWX{cF;3V0C&_%_zhdr>O> zr+RGp>haAJaUIEy?|h$*?VA>17kvM5^()a1Q&G`xQ{S&xHcZ0#{#Rb7dE?yMm*jPl z9Ms3>?SE`CndEgAUI*4M5%$mg^}zvNNAVw*<3#;@T&~jVL`k(ZuYK{5<9UJRm!20x zC7ksqfw#KnZyI@B#93P$w|SkYOS{?ILM?gv(;>(GruxEJcQg{70z4D@rg3|#$m@tE zmdF0e-(L^q^*6FF6aLXJ754A?ZD@1Z|LMR@z}02WHsRy3uU`b5$HarTXwQwtL5{-# z=P^m(e-QO!s`5BY`jzweH1I>(zP>REeh}Ug^GxMDJ`?;hH%9D;HZxP~gSB6~O!&e2 zb%h@a8Uy*sit`W?_|Gn0NGN0o$dUxs#uEJqilZ)_#eJ&pxcx3ZPZV# zig7*zd?HeO`8pT(ulc9jZ<6DyUoPzB_?D=iFo5Ihlh0gKal-n0?z%f)Xzs2Nd5^kL4Q1W72YrTaipZ5 zuaoikRdz{}19JOPAg4#3F1&m-L#{s^ILGhX&kAgk>(`wW<0AY2fw^Zd*?)!_VtjGc z75mgH_XdSIRsN0qYX;8tmq?wnBE*n~n^p?{u>Z?wj=9y+_!AGD{lEK@`Wxl(D~WOV zf0Sxmggk!ffu~?U=fhsD!=0jj>JNOKDB+o~GabAt4QBin>^wr*e=@;0ZHtd$zX|Q4 zf8@Zw+Ev2N!ACQv2aBH`P$1k1rL;gX{EUU&YETH&#p+6J6e`j?#F6Va=%VVG3V4PFVFWYh9SMHy`$9s3k z$4?9LhTC^)!sttCXI}mBDd<0#A2h6Y__t6APhuSHKfj`QNsWZ(#vi<;m)^P`EdFsE zfACJf|4E5p@mG$wnc#=-==)Q!_?v)hR|`98ocnEeu=pn-zCRWzpRBP;_Cqccc-772 z3&_V`JI5c_2|rn?yDi5z1@b(;B(6X6p~jx4pW~Yj-j~zDs^yC>*N^>x!`%+Z@l9SU z;>+Xf`jd+bsjYeXZHoBTJAPaz$Ir9|@kRXVguS~jSp4F_d$M+LvtaRyMf{S$`+msy zYQf@{tT?`=fWPzhf!uLdv|jXIJ@5?dH}_g$l;g+O0W+YtysPYRH55?)(SIcDQ4u6;*IwXg-JNebN;0NtD7&&XF@Iq`)Z4hW$=29Z+s0{ht;nY{uo=P@*K`1 z+21DUF@bk-@stGaSL9FkQju?Nw0m9ef8UXhcL|V7#{TAn!lmVSrJRP8qg`y=q2mM65PS|<83;d&z+xiuf@Hmw7 z`NY=)a(*Z*;d+cG3E=(wxqhQg!c7>5lUe`HZ)X>g@HEzs@w7w18AppscqWcl8Q|@I zvf#^N5}pJ+3%IuE*;cOr4;F9j$HEWy;S+51ac0{L-@b@ycOn{JufOm7b4r!gPSui3oYYdx>k^hXd|P86wip+)!RPN;j8DsQgckO#Z?A+KyZjb5{;SU4$V@lpEAlqw3Is2<$@nRoDNdB;(UMqOR zKA#n@1s=>EJ9wwxTCg%QFy8{~cY;5<)R#?^*YBubDf5kdLwV>x96gX%eJboEocfhs z`b}|j;r(RWp`rf;*$m=+TJb%xZ@pJ8*QX78F&`<_w66m2oE zDh1ag*=`r)8dRPhbiA^Fuf@F83x3%GGm8cLevTV)Pt&l(U)$1Q~eG#K$dd8v6IT z{yYh5=@hZlRIPgiQul{hm!hamUU!VRQ!TnRJKV0d*6zDsCrr5Wk zW@d^#=~wzM1N^SBn^*Dp!BWIm`Y#9ks-MnU6lB~DSNbn@tMG@({b*W{d1CH+S=oQ_ z;CJ%eQ`5LBZ~l3&;ytLz;1e&H|9G9T{=qUEUdDf!(05P&llx`-r~ORWH-Exg?w9eO z3Hie+l5P9J8v=%lIz^{N9tkEfvgvaYaOahrqEJ;QvqmVSE`KuS>Rvk+t~dw z{?mUU{PE?WvulF+PkEg<4*dV+KRzzK6P5YN%lIz^`uYz#-s)ximjV9picR$|h*o`iO1D)=VE zH(ODjgKsXR^`{pOP z_qlWs6jjykZ3n(v@Q<1FlkoIPVjeK9v$*Ya=;U*2)^_Nf3OpnO`uO?o=r@+dI9nE- z#&{NRe!koEL&L+<2B`Txb!zPnVL!M3XsHDq_Ex=YAbH>MCL$I%-(QneS+r+lqnze! zJ8@|vej4iI^O88o+akwy3_Kt6)v7rEO9G$tk^S2BVqU}kDL?E5M{!7Dn~2e3J1j;QXGw79W1xy{PxXuw4CL3i}^S>E4;jj#M$+AEJ*Q$nvqk*}s{U z9nI!?SDj)!4mkUF^0CWzlQwT|0bHE`obPiS`u3#VZ5}yaA)Joq$-voP>|gzf1+hy1 z(tI}Is>r`I$eoD4vYq`(cqYnuouy*m4O>DDRGaXpVWE)kB#Km-J2gFjdTnxB`su6h zDNjjw&udw6&1|;8qXzkyXZ(#2cvuE-_M18U{?F_;@<)~e?{>ICZXOb@-6`77^2r}{ z@5_CG{NWFjuP)y6dk}_=8aoa?=`=*LiP|RnCl2~w8@)Q|o^2NQYmFV{{Qhdwfvxqcm=YIG~r*_}*U_>A~-7KgFD>Nw}Nj1gz zHMGlbj)Dem}X;!`ZfI@ zXa618boKp@<4KydY0C&hC`-aFAP{yH#IVZ_yMRgyP!Z2gsO}nB4ufm zRb&`tl^tYQc2Gu{1`sGqzd5;&)80Irx4+lt_xz)`xsP+sJ?GqW$MZh#^FB#WF5d$= zGuFQL`7O_~ORT4UyU?HG(6+bLE?LiL;10}_Gb(TEz%qUEeH-`!$HTVp4w$AUir zY52;P-^y{5ihQ02#k5;3=%#J#+NPj{$0DEm+b*r@Cco*KHEJRn$x6YtxGd#^tvye%>Io7y5f3SM`&y zFK5r7`f^+vIUjNV-jJhP0^$<RqHhWsnU~!oO{P5EU@5*uMKt9Li ztDpBb2^N%$ot|e?=7>Jd3?Cm9U2%%XGU%2F!b|B?-G8CMe3+> zpp+a(3CQPjV}87PWCP!aQTZ0^r%eUjx=9Bu*15PHlRTxkZMH{$bqzH?79 zLH|kLbyGNA$X2?DUiscdHt4sMtYrCL&KZf?E$qF}ZE=TS=ZqK?^Z8iNQ~6{MzX!+m zWV%C|N%rJ>k0cHJzn9$*9mJk|@4aMzzTlG+&-i&`+H@uBFl*iaVt}!j2GC zGWeqQp#G5(?u#>xRr>9>8~e61@Sa77(6B{3w;TqU*Y6j-$nNGIbv-8{CR_x%KEv%$NcGyTJMzk z`5ZAX=st@WU5W1*NWS40VK<*6HfQdcqmiO`fBAflmDwHtg~K*BA^=X1mk{n{b9 zpoBY7t_^f&=H5NT?TyNJvi-n^y1bUc;HP$|j6Z@XE-m15g3pbVaB7Fy(r@bjl+VF< zUE}|HZ%FxkI_g*9CsDpen^Rfz%lzKZw-Z;qM;Ki+F8;rj=exg${8XfeYPAfwzqjIj zeV#8LX<2N#JTKw*<+H#)*SL2xugj4>xz9Z@ugL*ji8=imb36&{McicokJ>BjPT01% zI>&8*JUqYT_u^NsJ#aplyjYfl^xKBd-j(At4f$-}-sh%;l39$eJ>}gm8ukl6{L~}t@10|Z^LLBXG05ldBGqqRx#z_DSI?6W;*SH)>v4?_ zFUwe7*8C~s$-sF%?&Id=w>9oOWiD_{8t~Ddu71O(x2oKdHES%rYqVhg4B)&Tx8nF8 zRr?%YwT|&DF29Rtm!GxYcCXsT(XX@o9N=vKhilSTk6KvuC*V43IZ;o}@q%CX=Jwed z6QQC#*cOQVm;=H;!{7V0pS*8@`E&3+;T6{|^wSvq?BpL^9QcxvX8ac2P@WI!2Z{2z zU;2A!%>(2Ix`;mmd>j|eyZpXao^NIWXZ`<*7lbD|*L(bTPYd+LUcpCB@kh81U zjO98BXaBJMQE#eu%Kpg$zZ2&cl=!uRQT9&`@EG=k`kUplf1)yl{Vw#6Szi>~&HnL~ z^Niz$QNt-0`S;q!U-i~lgbb=@2l&{}wVSBo zLV)}GUEu5o7k>BO(BT&QlQklFF~B`YXSLmUPV%ePT};#)>)mPmvQ(MhbSTg-U8lES zrIza50NjFf_WVcTq2@e$GT?U`@B;CPb;Bgwh5ZFCj3aNq9KTF0;T(@n@V6;`yoFwSQPgg-Ey;`CRYseZS!j`-%L+acMX#?2KwN%p>_nXF`55>=m!Y78p>Mfy3x&+@-M*D<$U1&aqa=r4CXnEPF9 zAx-oncHmy5BObJE9bhl~#rp0%)mJaqhw+H;lNo8v8@;}l{b7MzEAaHiJNn7>oq~L} z_g;(p8og9sc9ib`-4{c*Ru2arqtfc5(0{2pB&F*JNYT!xDEQ9 z?R2Gi{e@`hB6{Vx9d%UL{r8WVt@t~}f?Cik$L(0qM~;Ye@_d--X?~&{w+W;1+>7x$ z8T{!;38#6jOZrXpSs4F$zg|{D(a#Eb8eME7@tgfUfAO^h4R%^md>M|RedBq4hXplW z3jt1k;O`g5Laqt)OWzswN6~01CGR47p7&be)2!h>s^mU`6d2Iv$5`k^E#0ed^bn#n9OrI!rjPE z?jZQPC!dtoTYdZK74t){R6g0I#D!kI^TbXFyR4{36Mhp;aTqK8_UV!PJe!~I6i=>o z zcpBziS)iL)ZPHzykNe^*EDibmyfp{EzxcY!@L==sWCeYcTlk|?!Fp#xg<83PDSkYP z^9W)=PeeZZwCPd8KE7Y<(|2+r3!rw8=@9YrKk65njpyS`pYfmi`M$3NJR9lwNveHe zP{8m1lY#v}{kMK8t~Uw-!efB5|0539`Y>F=+5agx$KceHS=-qE#2=0NNrs&8haY^c zllhS!{hsjCw?ls%8k&b|or-x%&d;yy7TSq+l%>%B(%DTj)p`879EJXqV}2bL5MRKf zeiMEed3J2gusnWk<}RU^cc7@Je!a)fk;{(*A3yII)nREjH3-Q5WZ*o%EaUxZwS0fU z@t^fT$Uo{huu@|d0*F5Y{07XE?tM3YU5JFU|Fb}MqEd%Uo@Y>e#jX-^S-%|6Rmv*+ zC(rXmX~Lgrz@ttHe`t0zIU>*Z4S0{ji}P1+{qEf$&!-)@FHQjene4Xfc|Ps4N1LtK zuQ#c1NC&z6bnvmiN_P2VyFBkq1)hoYy)>hi?I3@}B0n4HpPjy+8YazK^``^lz4Ycz z&G@`I;*SQ-@xIpDy?Z$L$)9Px#JI}w8VmaMb6(zvFtQ~gC3!LMX9DOhdkeqM^A5t3 zLq+}MKyHC)Ti%xal~GZ|AIDVkj*6YR6yncfdvN~}cejgL_E!$$80U8%>UlmO{>})0 zu)XibM~2JwnF0P7&^4Utn9BZ^{gDCv<3Ly4@%IyM$Fja@ke3X)J*|e!=XL&I@tO|0 z@ptMx3%0(m`bYSO<2w`dpX|?`&+CnH`ElGIfG){4q)TC=ppfgs-dNQ0h(c@TOZ}NP zr9xnRgl#^;pTeO2UYBq-Fuvw%i;PoC@>7AczmN1;ohbK5vB1-jYK!*FeUFL!6a6*X zGq1mauE5H_`tZ7+utv7>rTBsK2e_Akq_6#77dKQ)T_76!h53s&IUjG_t>tF zKUYio>CXkW_oMxLd?5Qb6a3MjD|)9ysx%(z;?SS*I>b+DG4FHVMEWOykNfXm_f5GP z(BELb7t=<>PqVvyPif35|K+!z^+SD>crg0QVB=jT=!y(F`$`_~66T{n0Dm^<)_p!y z&Ha`rP53Jnxc}T&k9Tq4e_l7_vfO{iRtc=H2^lBv z%jKtmkNtJ;gV4cp|D6mx18Kz}y_T^Znq86oWeN}U*Rw0z zR?Gg%gk1Jl;xEVQ%Kpk`9OK=H(f#ho@u$BSXzx_h#5B1+)4?ANx>j4?oXq~F{)PSF zM*EBf-Ger3HgY?a^-YDm1kfcuJ^F(@-YMfX4Rq1Bvla&%@66cG$?Y!#^bM|Ajt3j> z640KrLD&1=8lIv?p&{9$yg!P%B>eNYYV^rs2DT)RUU`2M1Nv?+!fNxLN#>&aOy&I% zVRZkTjQf!U@bh_rY52{33enSjyA%0>KO{_FTJ#_KQX-AT?+LR`PUrrXXzB9V85SEQ z=y+W4Lf*EuLlSlQ?F`E-8AxxuEd27;y4nvzh1lG`bRQU1KQL}BpeG_Zc+-W*mP{2CAN5X$gf z&%9Tf{rz3>G4wz66Q;gmK4ZNv?8gLr^An(OKSD< zxM2pL73rXP1#;g%pz<@YZpZ%rbnJi*yp~S5gZZJ~jxW1^E0^yA&gDND@nw?KZ|FS0 zSu6_al8ltPW?m*KYxJ!X3)2KVtU4Y5YmLbD&SV6 zk%NjOILDFc58;;^8{QnEk#P2>1$ddK_ixDYVnaUHm$6teGy93^ zo8!q2y64|~SVi)W&WU_8?9h+s^{#9m#{-vtZF!MUxqL79*}fG6h8yJaS%02qkG@m6 zp$7dR>1X;=*v<0WCwvjb@`J^L1@r^wMLguVQ{f_c2H-ZN_5Mxi8DKBhH|A}HZXPcn z*M|dqE~E{+jw~+w!wq{qz~kd5kCE$JbuBQyTdjDrt^EAK0DdFr%50i{SAPDWLcfrL z)QEa9gMMbAI&*?Oe^8E7R?tU|DG|=|BK8ycRXI+jf&QTSTtcwt56W>W6Z9`X%vu%f z`GaztqOxiHO5yPb{L$BizX+#wU$gX^##8=IDt~_<6X(&i?)`Z=?zf1SE|PCmjE^=+ z9(|wHp%v{hOt7dpE=vraS5S?(B>yPObwN(c&liyA6rU5TlW;yC#|yeAsUrr4%J^oXf6PWP?kzTS-6!)~ zMu>R=>%Tl=O=TVr{QBJ#e&YLzrb~Z2t(C?TKKIoIx)(Jf!*mkP`_tI|)<4g%Ys@PD zMe?2C<2d-{Qi+8j5^e|XM*6`U@zX*j`6lFhkSMSi{9F?0+A>Ha$l8Q4OQIjQD3W+eh-<;OF-DVaG9w4!Ty;J8TY@%FjJF7436lX0r>jd^h+wzW-Q#d8{1YUdGY>J0CtYK=NxXhdAOZ%#Mk%DhTG-- z%>vws^vId`6S@?^PyG|03+slRZqPmW_~RL2HbKXKY1~w{Z!hR$4_sXJ0Spz&J2^|%LabFe>rk5HZZ>6e>>=QoSrl&Sp9PRJ3&`=XuHCpLF!l8-@8G-WOqdq z+Z|B9z*T<k`r;=M0dM2{ml_t9a3{v26yU$jeJ9xfJXn1=KsWO4GE=bc z|0(0$1^PQV_D4m{s(>qK{|EY;Gb^_V_WeI)d>9`JzYRbB&ZotV0pe98U#X7;^r{!e zk-@(Ir|geYK>u^wslSy76z|`Mq?~UN3EfxOFpqG8-^1nlaJp~Hk$w|>rY3M+rN{Xe zB#-Ww+~ops&Nmej`LU0LA2{C-BJ!5&AApb1LG#LV*h^@zSQ!>LH(h=ZlXp7rrm10$mEyztZ>A*J9tDC{5fS z@b`-N{@MZhi7w)eNjxN<_unzS8}#OqDa}HC`|sHQOt1W2k?OIqztF{FzQy%G zdWstd=KH+g&;)vtNB&do7XIb(=MF1hL+z8pcnavb|M;zbxm1dPSDqwP%Au`zBb@) zq;>X(443rPsh%Rf5x*B2be_fM5t6;8Uq$_K{8w6Zp}#P1@yWhQMunAVJ@m4*8$-lZXZ>z-Cr)xM>&o>kkk3Z`VZyx7$f-Ee}9!5 z?~?tedM5m0M7sZ6?<4Yjp5No;_B*!3#^2@VM`rL@k=BlUD^;HF8?m31*9n(xIDSH& zZ#%%p{rkzt5_P2hTbIH((qRp58N)2O{twmvEd1ky{T|Te>{#0@Tu*b~;VXiT8KM6c|BZJ__=-&W^~MF;l3M6c}s9H94%iW^rv zDnGq)JadD-d85!NujvEnX`aL5nOahn)`hL;_f;>2e|TNkgx@kftqaE@pTy8OshmGK z(BBeH-wjIzJE%)Q&#K_hJr^7N*Q;Etn8&ZtnlYc?ypYK=Dp1*U`TKv!!#r&W_p^dp$aAoM{|fv6Zr5%A$2$2@X%F#I`$z$w34F|B z!Ee@|=*f=>$QS(i&#&NfIDQN-)J*1Odgb{Q>5!MUs_c78yD09J-wn+I{owugZ?mo> zn=Yz1RfE8I(yNk>%o{Cm@~bUf;M|V*T#vsZ-VDKgD)@=NieM|MCQs>!8@ueCo>@+VB{Yno=0lUS1H2{6OoKV@RSi5c`MNFV<_An5)b z9uFLte>y?m>Cn(cLHruV?-%hoydKcMG3FCjsA4>zI4~j(`2NPA3G`3qxIq7uJz0Bd z!2KWSd46yzj=A1?0=nSo?HK*zn?y9-G7~Do?HK*pSJbYzroHk=lYl1 z3AHOT>^5kH-?&|w@mr>+b`^(w@;v!HcDm?a`TdPveVozAz8CD9+7_{w_zMFVFM2yx&Xh=_r+#?>vcE zo$yP8DUa#3y?~4QD`j~^Kzc-jF9B&9Qo?%O)VE^dmg|+T+J0V`W zWO@VMukb*g>-Sb4=!|}{+&@IGeDBi`D(t#;=Haza_?sDsUisdq8T7?$vEPL;AyTr} zs_?rF^h82&lKZ_B^l$N_3jU!n6Dn|iUz+d#S}zGJsUtypl|FC_|L!v#M*>i2LM#4SdW4y|dp6`W7INPVv3qSmHRezP& z2S~mO{OrH?cGtcw`zJO=lxqh6lB{Eg*+0Z@MLzpw*O&ua*)N21yJGo&|De;$^^*dA z2h#mtc77_~Kf936{d47Z=a+|}{(SY5`<}BAbRMKdYCDSQ;Rh8i(#HjRRpG)PRTfll z87}$DgnS;)!h0WnCqlw4z*(P|AIfixlyDpKV?0}K8o9p!a9Lk&&vwvX=+|O&knhgs z+Q;qL3Hleu5|auURRI^tSH_IM?TukPAKK`bsSz{2T?nrWClahW$-(m;jvpnU3GfpN!EZ~iD!1wT9`Z%wH~Uj90pw>r_@WC6d*YB1 z8O6Cx`c3u7`yhFrKKGN0KUB>KHhwdGav4z{4#?Y7VEln#7?NE&0CeV|;)J~juAC~9g9d}sjYRrTRoc9~^_&wfmwL-A*+X1;{ zT7T459v@uD&&K}yft@o=^7zE#n+J6FyLbPL$0ynUs=~rf_J7~)y+U}L655LKTj@_D z_;lV6w+0)(Q&6r2bYpf-I~i>JHesJ_i$X2$YRsZU@}C2Ij8ARZrbvi{vwbemtu3W5 zFOT2s9|!c9*>QF;**`pfs|>>a`&+ACV*gP2M&z?!_Pv^^X1@^5<2TE%+I~(0xqi&x zw<7&u%F~cR=v<&{*4Gs$kKbP8^Z31_ z{F06ll0OYagdbR+Q-&d5%Hy{QIFBneJOc;G<2UQe?b!nQ&;NYO6KwoudT!4)F2CZm zAPv=LL@v3`KhoYdfk}0THw_0^FBd)7sLVRTkQXFx=ztBh&~4EaweQp9QB&8 zKhxHHHQOz;L;ONsEaFREB{AM6O zb&RN|VjF(?RIZ<7;8{q+Lr*W@X$;AaN)ht8{N%rH1-w_42K}Q-2s`UWWp1dzxZAU7~<;Q`K`_UtxhYw-DQu(?2WI@+%WwUgij}WehT;^|<`l!FWK9mN&45Zti zo_#kA_2#Ru(CDc`zl`RX?}F~ws&7Kr4|08Z;Ex>8J%9bCBOC;zPYm*-OA3FOS{Gj& zA>pyeXMM*NynZMW`VfB(>LCGi*9Udz%kQlao{D^KZ*d0;?&1CDgr@`N{^&x>8np{a z^0S5tJ2^hX8f@(>$5S@zhxWcP^SfSBd)Fi<2>$qiH@sxl?pkfn#i+|Hp#Od4tD~cY z-TWTrl;p+6? z^l9t|H+r|ZO|(>gx}yA+t5$tkqe$XF#xoV=4_a1e+R%cnssh(!1D{SAzH5nL(9>`J zZcvy0C;vtv-nss|Uo;n$swpoah~7E`tiJ_bHV0gLrr<|)4`vK^tFCZ>dNz;Y?hDyw74Pt zFP`^M|HjW9^reLzmNueaDL?dO7SDe~X<{9b=@TF~8ho$**tfX=^pfa9^-PB}4)hz= zRxlPcGNnkV{idS6IG$5Muc;IAJ;yzBk$?1{&j4MQGunT6K16sn^11#te(-p^L25tx zGKg=i8#g~_-c=+I*SJOm#%JL-d#U)_#8|CZE3O}5@mvk-M=x6tr&+~jP|H$91U&-+w4Zc{UYm#?VhycGF zUkSiDzS8G>dnOWeqBNmzcB1fOD(Lr@8`y{6=OKG-qXf?J@xc{SM>PaceHbuKJ8*8o z#Phc|zus*979#QC+8oGbo<6BFV&(F)fJc=R{utEaQSNh9DnADK{Jj5zDvsvz_!tM= ziSHcuZGLxOcN zKsRph*`EA83bKdmm)pmmXS(X-`qjTK{1A<_qW9fXd=3Kfr;ir(!TsBqBI|R{(IGqm zd~9$3r5nQK?}WqxPerO3sd-r(?T^m6jA* zF`vi;{i6@tJXY=}COtFIK2+slZ~xM7@Igkj?xR=S*HAfhzmtslx(R$1q=eJ`QG)cF z=uH~oFVZUs*A`10we%a-JkeintD z?oq=3#6$0;IzxnhJce<-Zr%LOW;N=K{2wz=(DC_^aYo_SKWhx$#rJEh2id1AmoWcx zeDI|p<+kR;Z?>1{efFp`kx##U*fXB1amsT$+nD&oVM*~x)rb(6FAj3gE!I~M`aW5C ztTXGr|ehXcdSN@87rj8 zdZk0o%QerMW_`7&7RjObbq*KvUVi_iO_MVBL;RzRz`fw(^|&678mhDs&hNJ}f4gpH z{*n1j6@@>Tf9Ql|J7j)-zm55C4ViUDBgwZZ_-CK5HIwDjIAPBb`rAR5d|bp&vA4Ii z)H=w@yo=~nptpeDiF9oF{h#RUd9?H&(c7L1`3BH=kj_hr=pUMrpPu(m8Y&69WA_Vv z%08T+4GTig`~Ud;PBZwva6I$q;Rh~-^l_s;_^EzMbvkUtgi%d`bmJR(D?^khwo{XgSk$P6t zAJ=1tcRC+erwJGMaINWef%E?L7kz&_CGTH1RSArP(StT`koa{L;3mAsR(#gurP@6C zI(|Ql*Sn`hELthAciX|w?aS4;;qMw>z0&1x-;86PY7U$9GDN~{z}-lDO!#1mPAcEa z{J0Mo7E$w3sDvA;3j4S}PphUW8Ybi5H-WC|_uJ0vf&1bocfT>W7Ypbf9Bn-)JXP4i ze~Dh%UTmOWe{s^&h-9V|DbXw2iv#o>TYUa7G9fS?h+f%V+@PN}W!Gl~;_}lg+l#82 z@W=F$Kg}-~o1b3UUQD1r)mc}$P)vS$WqYxL{-JKXqi}S7dS!dDgMQ12jNOK){PfE9 z;sSkxGv6*Lq7S5}@s`_*+>U6x^`hN)!O!EZFunV63+Ku{9HO|<(4?Lk+=mv%eR5w5BJJKEDBd^nYO>|K_+pY<}@_mmJbd!rNNTv6gaIVAIt z-<0JOMt;kN9x>qO{nZKhE!$3hOF=&I`}_Nq!Y*TZ5tmJ`Hvg7=Pq+p5xi0Ya8$MPq z-)DM|&*!0+T=DhAy!*Nkl~Xa#SG^(Zr1HtGe7IjP-@Z`LS@HggS>p5Ap^1}zQ~kIV z?asbX*hA%z9jed7@67K+`qQx+8r~mCcsk^9`)b=T@ul9^ztTnZrN{h61-Y4^*V$Uf zg`@olYC+HYW_h1=Ht0<~x+F*ZS36oD^oyz`{Pg&6`5z;Lv?I1xu3w6WRFo47ey+=8 z{Fdn{9_+{`-N}z$g&z&e0{xhR-#mUdEc$qWywAc5dF;n6?{rwt`(k82rhFyj8fptW z--=Eh81Wx|~uB@xJ$7K2f8eCixlQ=jSDz%-!Ac{@^s=Sx8r%>lh`k=jSN+M?ASbm!BW`?XN5R z68DaX(^vf}9Od;YY9~>4;TN_q2J~~w^-tur1+Ev87l-oVKsVsZSr3mRgr_1u4bKIq zwQt%-etwh=+~5^{?b@a9F8TRUCUBPj^x3|0^7A8Wb72STS@q?fM?CIP`TBaoUKi*} zU9R+w{JlA)z0shLJh!||BpZs9JOqIFAe-zGlV=he#>&GKgdQt@%!}En7$D7ynn4x|2=EYZP%;^ zu8UbBa9-Ca6Q6TgVFc5WVvKoJ`O+v8)WEbGl@I5WVvKoE*?Q zhn3YunDf&s-_MC|AncE>_QOm%r%NecsZSi}V-hpJp>=&Fy;7f4(6<}e;d_c}CB0Ig z4A39{_uJXDuR^A$aWp~E|7U}qoan1BZFFN%-~2uJ1|K$hNf=#JpD_)Ey<87!Psgsj zzC(B%aE_Phj>?U~QJ;h-1Lt#K2GujK;P-0@PXo^D1f4qHcoiw}X8`AQf}KbH*j+%v zvlz!ZLGStrH3~|24&zt{_-E!-Yat1bY9#FA{`W$1T&2Q!xH_wd=ui0jhc8xtvo`XV zZHM6>bsYHl`-fcyc2*a?w7|c`#b=*7890Cc@b_KspZva$Dfjz?X~0jG?AC^4e)Vib z*UT|J<5+$M>xbuUj@M?G8&0TnkMS%nzl*3x?SVDfWhM>W3tW=}oCn1x_fj`h`$;@8 zBmHbe1MQnydd|azvps*Z{FuhVKWyKn7M*zDw7)-qY7URe;M+2F~^! zI$N^kVO#Ts%%29F=NEm;j-4=ly0sGH8C*W>t6FW#>B{k+&SUvm!1>w5`GZZjCHz>< z-wY_e?68mHbJ570b#i|d6(j89_*zr@o>uCw)W%|g{(19;cDeOXz16H=9QfHk@kz^i z{9!ElE#t{7UoGkpN=xGVD=kaHOkNcPUZ#K!%N;r>4IiS0=XU2A>Ps8j@+Qv*I(77= zKiy7T8Y1CQz~hkC{pm>EP)U9U%1s8o$JNmt=E#$uhJ4=dP$Hzsw|WU@|FHgN)*kIH z>z}14e~#yLZMpm$mXH1~CgHUvVUm7PO@w{i|CL)*Z>e6wGr%7Mx_VnLI>Vu#e|`x2 z;y4A}xiDPH2U@nU1 z814^27cyd2IfE@vUNq$J{6gPU*k2_%zGe|COUk2Hj_1*!k8tfBUeppe-jcq`@jMRn z6XQxn?1}b-5{CTrN`0c< z7XJAuao8S-+lGAdSaWC2=1-`_&ZxGx@Zc_d--7Ge!beXF(p%5BhK0Txv?6A7UBL0nY0)LkoPj zaPY}H!&rV)b742@eV}05xSwyoJ&tf{modQk{y)32&?m8JP7B#Krq4imDTwbl@IR`) zV7bz-RG-;31M4dl^pF>7zx%ovEXesa_GRw=3qRgM*vspJ zg*TiY6k?>({C(TAD&k)irY!Ko|P-vF2W7KGk_m2*fNgy zn-T7=D)_U29|-UJbEHvdLU<1H^|b}vx+dC{bRS9=;R)c6YAO7(v%u8053R ze*Ad#$U;UxJH(h<13J^BPX`n+l9$B%OxfO}TMNI%lvr|^_t6PzL9cA@v7jIGqR+xyM}vX-QDu7< zwLI(~DV5Ixne3;Fb$;wFOr@m-wq+GJAvi1Y?wu56UHB_;Ygk~~didFhbXx!B62!-EHRBYD(6^ZhB$zj+@~ z+k$KBY8^zCcM(0`@ALdS2XYS#c>k5oo<~dn5k0Se@ccWvt?<`BuT4^irsSvReME7f zYfwBg3$B62%e9pg72MiS~agTaVdU%pf8Wx8K57rD!y*GHE@1P^r@h?q>FJT z8}#+IX4MR~kH`di9&e&zg}o!s9Xk|h&M#j%kBSBT_Gx7r2ir$vf*!0-GU#u&3hhtr z-WPkh7wK;RJ?oPW`lhGm*8E@g5oLk?)!I!9g6$*X^*`Q6q;DteB_(|Er?nIle&c;Y z9Y^$?DDM-B13lOCA4OW;k@pED1NUOR_u<1&wrc%PkNom=D!W);;rr{0MJ8OA_X%Zy zpVw!eq}80Ou?QFW^wVWAj`hFqrn{0uBs>jx4pPn93nB78p{Vx4UhZE{bcpLD?-Pmv z&hyA8f6j~vwofPybR*~A-yCe85Vwb9(0yj9zT?0432}Q!1AWz5TVDm+CzPdV51F7p z*t>CJ(0xLR_K*YmA|Kwo9&DeGvOPq15dPYH;@Zq$`-GJ3ArADP+P7JP?GsYAhg8rH zI-J-!*ghd;d&mHNiH9Yc{xAE4vO!<&)v8~D?Gxhm5ZDfV=W8K;qB;uudA=Nr-!eUo zPgdk}J4&t;*p6B`HfGB0$N_qe^C^Ee*2(7&yBJ5DpRE=(S3bYV!#LJ?imkg~;PacP zAK`vB>jd^UcM^6?E>^5Kp9djYmFV~RyheVn%n168-!yDO`*dV`Nj~p0V0sJaJ@MPq z{+IKIQ$Rocxu>ggzYg6e#Nxh>`za^r;osczhq?SY7stBQ`n-NZ)fw#^{(JjHr4jOe z0ro%lLuX5T+(7MLg%|ylnfdYDt8yXhTN(+s0_T3BROP-WLxB7IlY9Op>z4xhd4EJU z4R)Td5x4_smB_{CD zZX8HWpx+sOpmC^~Df7xtfm|!-=4!tz6Xw4w7xCmgEZQOKx&PiTDZ%{V1V8(us=e^6 zVE%BuF6xKH)hbOQV|mF0nYyH|6s(GNZ?d|`TDOcXU;hVsYs0gp3P$Ja|8mc(<@Rj>y`gSW(?U`C>6QCeQ$TNeW9&ZVJk7r! zK(X#c8q@ll2mPQE{5&ps@LTSuXc3l;5z!n^GJRGC=s_3NO0@HC-#ylan3z(eB%jX{O6xA_htHARsGZwY8-$+E z6G{MmCeoeywIg-L{PLCd=72tCQp!x;H^W?{5AQ3D0bO(tq1P7!Cr_hsO1@~ENg=>ZCCfRo+GYT*exKr$f$#MjL1HxbC0-BA@%+r_IU~ zq5hjLAFheID*XLmO7E_eH#_vj72n4<7Xw#E^%VB-`r+L+6FU{%zHuVsF~E8KFlyVa zerI<(x&YV20pCs;zN=KDZ+>>|xbJ^HN%kfK=Xh}~7Wz!>eWW7yPl8kQi#f0-4Seq& zu9=O{ zxaF6JbuEs^7|{Ju@n$LBx5@H|UKx*Zpud?he|oTUEtT<@3i{pOjNAHO=UQ?+W`N$9 zbs~h$wUjUFH#i>Uet`OoRQNd?{M>Iu^%j1R>8al^A)n;??98{%ITPoXSNx)Qs76)- z^vZq4HpsitcikN>o7t!xWhnYPhg3erwF>*FHh*7!2JyxH+AH?^7yq=P|9!aH3wn<0 z@=bbV*8Ax9eT*C8gqSeXW(iZ%U6kbH@q6UG-skYhjBY_-Z!zOQCQXFf#pxLd?#?Wuh5G2H%DJQe1Q4g zz}db&XG1>dcd*|H#=TrV_602bxW}4d4YPbB7xeEV?C15>V~JOL{4noGzp|Si zIL!VEX0HqM_cirDW4}rDoi9E-pbxF~Dnk1|#E0QMVQ-hC6V19H@sR>~X3%|qYvQ>G z$zDG9hvy}2>pZNemT*4z#}0numCxt#e30TR3;Tn4J>>Ai5;isTCfo@=H`4N!%;#)Z z(0B)3qtN7g!R)aCH@q+GzOI@P&);FC@-o|seq7a8%*Q^xyReYkMF6pwWAJ;44R^~?w^ex^g^bE?Jfq*00S_?P-2 zwX2WNU)5jO*=KQd<4X^3wj>%Ku8l@M?*|<}t4ClmDhKKnjB%$$!tUq6_` z`VLupl>0a4B74lxH`*%v_13e@p|q|~7sZ(c<1CMpaiDv8IcX0+#}m|oUip4jGUyMS zfA*C3jmz}Pc~d&*kN?p47SBDHp5}YXc@tqY-*aO=lm&jrRuRwo0m3d{4CP)l-!meg zGJV+p`Fw2FVuo z%ko_c`K4!O{E#PKlY6ez(9LDjNoKFBt6yv`n%W8S)v7_lKAtZ=m~hzs@!IV?A5jhNbd_GF@R51>#1`B_T zdH6=M&PZ0~UDU3vki+p|1pUsNzcdd;oG}OKAH7uQWdYrHC0m7uN%5G1e2(|wCwsr( z_iTLpx#uo%{k1Mw^6Gc9x{abTe7M@h{MZM6*7`%($5Wd*8213@`dj~5gC0H2)0+d= zsN#ja-6_L&b-47F`uFKyuBQJ z$`SQ3b565Vc|7Iz?F9e%r00YAK9Te_4HbN>Z}oG(_my!s_`FE>d{ZT!$3)`KvWj+U z7$W@gU1;qh-0lfi4GhHl{MLGsjI(|TGeo_Q9{b@jH96CF5x)&`8E-Lab4A%c3vfH9 zFa8-L`^Tx^e_CDjOlt4C%sE0owsXzMUkb?fdBJZ(8hN==Nm+lxP+>Rw=TF_3M{@Zl z;H-aa{cg?W^3&#u@}2PSji;|Ik^OH|@YlVxr;)6m9XR_jdUoP$SwFs?l``PB1+AAJ#G^t<2hf4-mdf^J=nS?_2i+>jvb=W{c!UM*6O`vK}N_Dhv(01|Jf!VRFm!J`Li4R zV^59vRrbFZ`Fw6>x%G~Pvj3gH4a0;VtOGtf!+U1r_%{K6bg^A;-djUB@2ltd7|}oK zR6zWLkMa6X*7uS1w*a>zz2E+94)28_`A!A@oOYeN@}3#OIsVy>L!~lK%KCf3Z$mn| zearK*{)P{P-3H(*hBRIwmu~{j`cJ5E@tj;f$3NHKcWeKhC)b}%!GGxb-et0WcHr#C zcgk+BE$e5;{wI#_Qt#Zgb9~G3$@;k=@6P0msXWi&c=OX^9f;@2UeLFGwDk$MJEoWG z-#A?Oslv3zlem8fCXe+Pk&vb3IFRL8AjgJuO#FghxLr_r4&<|(O^zEw*q=Um&k8~q zr(739MvWOTVnqKzqec$p?SIt%bLXEP$UU?0PE7b+$14)!!?lJH!Y(K7>#k&dS6$ZE z1f2a8xsjjJO^m;jI$Zc(*4L}h$Ci3*2HQpY z8b%6x*zVtVb)75sPgcCI&GWTVmg&#s`wJ8JEl86Fum6tQ9m%&T2pHsH%EFjzG1t06*Z&8oa^8J$=xM399!4JnX zxxPrh6!^~seD$;Bemq~L`sBWhQ*Nui`t0x9b2)_T0`-;K9&M1BRW@O7_KsNv`Mq#z z&&u)J2)gD=&mQ7_SuW4Z?HF|RGvaH?efDvmMgHUX=aeyS4`auSi(ZwmBtvPID(%5c3LpsKH8PYDvGA4f17~i`Bf>yRG0rJg5S`-=O z*bze%K3wZSKI^@+f7^zFTg(?-3cU}!zM#IWw@0D(FQ2q`$$Ilx!zqvXZO057IT!_z zo}Qn?eU&ju_-U+m{f=@`O?MFq*HNNM$auDaW~QdF(&?!xYGyvbf2dUKa;c zA)Cn`PUN#c>=PbxbMyPd4V?SCryqA%%(SGh6}T7a+FJ3mxy}f8;=af*PWWX_*KKEc zzdqp>;3nYj?a&=4jtcS1$N0nRBex6mYbTd)10Ua?H%f1w$?@oy58RG)VBs~J_{A8) z-MDXc0zdZfZX<4MzH`4KhI=^-ID9N98+($crKhPG>;CI4^--Ud> zA8@p6d9<`q2q4@xUi9l+A9F7M-c;64^`Wqj`D5)T(n`1o`dLA@YIGM*8Q}i;GVJ5^*c8z9|NB&IS#D@5agjX^tY1ZU-#SBdt>DIG$jjv@%q*9 z6S1M(canTwzlxeC`pb-I18U0ryslw`oMBh~I4}2C-XVeOSCjj_*G9(e;Bz8PfAIK- z+@JCKl^b}`^ha;Y{Ta{y8Q*;>>wOt#{rG!F8;|JE$?;;EAna$nc7t<&%Jvz6Tafnr z`o327j}7_UUYLotLw6Uyne;;@nmAT$+G|K z;OF+ZSzF~+2-*wzhu5#1pc~b5Wu#WZ-N@(ls}H+wR_lQK@6RowKj8H%FX*@5uktJ3 zN1*A@bF6&pSB6Q#{AEzF?n(*H_B9`gw2^((f2P{~C-Wczvj$_{?> z>rowL|2vV->sJ-*)%VH%w*hw}ZLxapIUakde2#xF@JIEw4B~mbtUt#`-Fi8>_xFUG zCI{Ak+e#xx%laFDTabRUZq{q^{NJYFKig<_8=m8ne2#y%n#uY*!EZvkcJh@H zvi@%5v;9A9e*UpszE@Gc^;x%La`_zpTz^aIUcW2XpXsAO`*#)YJzLh#0-WQZcGCfW z$@*D(i1_39p7={rX^u~_-wuABkNr`>}JGX;up zKP$_#L5>~iN$txna(%gw&vI@qct4Bp&wS(^9Ivkszlqm>K(}p)*~)QCxEuLw$GedS-jMz21 zt)>1zhg{nM2P@#UG8a3{*Og04s8dzIwxE~#K|3h<_p z^%MBJOJpzKn{&!*3nNF3?N4ig6!iaPw+nJ7#C@TD*u6s+wkrqutZV6)zbuyRasZE- zDg1Ny(?`eoJ%1Wklf9pB+DE+O&%+**{UUgx$Pu zdTm>`X0kmoz`37V^5c*(>`SWmIN-bv|MLZBBc3OcJ$#SPDX$68dRgaDBjXcoV<-4l z3`Zsm7&y##Oo6{>*{(FmAM)kf-|Q{8iO=QLx)pj~PaQp7*4wMl%QR)<4c43V;`ri} zZ^8ZRc&ts}GM-A-%QRc~t+8f!>)rb&Zdh)c+^>N-hW(O)e5UIX5kHe9kY0R0WHO8A zAGc3jC@uH5F7WgCQgr>g$MSgV0PaCru=S<^^8K)-7oHbE{-b|de<{m1&Jq4#`CY!! zx0dCrfSZw8;%i*s`$E#+ihTD#v98hdtFRdPej*xrrGW0z0qsM1eanvf6$kJ_TMVC- zhJ#2xuXl1g{H(`~DeOzaUEuQ|t^If9TV*7E8}5HqbA_E@nZ*W{m2d-aBk)@ts$`dw z@TkGUf4trh-r~?j*?-m#gx$QJ)H^LJ_q`UJKD&!?>+pJ|Llm3I-n zQr|4dOT2yfCa-@p2hl6_)h`hCB|j^^r~EJa zrb6DOW9_Q{FZyPH{$a?>D#7%1Mg;1cE$K^f8f6#uvOQ#n|Gi1j#Q>-LSXG!R1O80w zDfY`UAE!K5;jz;q@skX?d~qI@Amx)^V-;~=xFh12=t&>Oxg5%;ef=)T@!S>kT)qeS zGCl3<&j~2kcVC0}=I?jj+&Z8S``uTcx%;ML779N((SB+_?zWKoL(+vVqUUoZxIM;! zZ%ajURUXd-wV+qVUn=N-eO|aJ*R=6 z<2)0;WqOKp5AvyIC@vihM0-^=6sZ|$R{EaIU~y~&J;$+evG9xSV*QK3;@DAN$Ypv9 z=-;VWcskF+MU;qsKUHC83h0T(7e|`3{X!m}`{`WN!7y!ozXrh7ZqW1l97Ee1mPH-v zn0w#r1H9i zx!)GZF;s0=MQ$g|?}8tnl$uvsVCBJ5{9<6A^^&`Iss1f1Jpt6@bdhe|lx&+jL0&m7S} zV-^aMem3x1pht<-f7?PN+}laCe>><}?oAw}m2l?gekvr#{+i711fLseFXQ7uI*DID zNX*MP9<3Rc+;fykKf_XCKfl+#r_$}BvVTp$S^toE9qP&cwE$=R-l^uOBm0;A!|y|u zH>KT^-*>cwpZz;T-zq1>BK$}5h?LC0`gejp>f2@I*-wHR@dVtB^!w6{)=K`+rr`V7 zYA|_wPX1fwH>L@Husx*kn7upe6Ei+L(lGHKlsZ>Jb6Ip8M&mNWWP@Jg|N>KJv&ye zbVSzQ1ix|l%M!L%lgl@QpX0sJ)!n1z@_D}n^Z)8S{et;})n^LiRbKx*g5ySbQ`Dyw zxC3dSgbpQTdyKG?_4)Gd!WU}EpKkDZk$zD2`Bd3nBk~Pj3cqwdopn^MFB9@PJ|n*@ zH$*SVPvQCi-LenX$Akl?@BWz3?wv?2@VgE4|L*;?cZ9D$;dmt5$xq60$`1N13zi&= zG!j+bMfA#XDiieO&UcUD=L^i?m#-M7azOv`lSQ+6&6VkCJXVfVgwcG}iSZ@+E8)L5 zq=eIboK5=ei%(6~2GQT~TJOoWHG8Ss_E{w4OPKO|rY6uY znY8;zggHOG@_VLM(7#Geyg=`jE9EQov4j5h#1iHL#{Be3eO#bFekAq~J%>@sSL)*h z{k_O(HriMy(^LJXE9NK0<-$MYL|=VsZTLPP?^kUSTKx^e=%W6}270cCK^0EEtw((k zZU@fa1$nlSB(Zs0t=RJ-y1+(-%c0_XnW(4^~a_95B#IH zgP*?}lf67FYi{znQ;a*ge0(>i<9Wlbr*Hr4--qkdU*iV;`H&Bu5YO3mYxEuJs8=w* zm-WN@qNA%NeY&?sl^n(mD~0_$Kb&I?t2ZvDQhneW6L4NTuW;ta>#tw9_B-?Q_sH44 z?H#kmw0V@}Uor6Mr?#41xtFMZ^v;G*D?*z{Fbqa0X z=G23s^_brcoaeu_Uv;QFv&8uejC;9!?Ca2c)PG~amh=46UGks7A?)Wh=pKuHh^~Gx z<}>E!@3XUgv-Yoj*YoP?FN|Bj&-HhpdaW}N>uUSO`RxbJ_LUws;NI}oJN?fTseC(d zwlC9F{q>n&ulJv0Mf^_SY~Nq?Gx}XFRl>gnN4T5Ihkd`l*)deDE8_27Nxm02uYv#A z`^l<$WkdXr(S5kiIUMWR_-@Z9ouBjxagcSQ{hC$@|8V=9`oLaC>+r+=_Ra6BTR>Od zRduUQ!Yw0&d_EU=-Jvyh!htYB(oU;RLt$vFiC$C^0|NLGS>39Uc%Xa)~`y}HUnk- zY~bhemvkTcrd+byI~ zNBu63o-aG#zvuF=BzKPu&wo-rJzs{tVEwWAE$`eo>UVjxJqhq%_w66N`^BNT`n5ed z@W1`1zrJGB@A7DSD&X&P)VD8^F?x}8P49nMx9Ry?B4l1qU|wt?ec+3>ToNzqwy+a6 zI=A#*m^5+37~Yqx;`fk4m|uLWv0pG@F*j?mwAo_i9Tp>(TdZASvG5^_VeB`wiZ&eo zq{Z%MET-`L(B+a1r@v@1cD=>yS1lH90DjG4{p-MQSnT4vC#hQ?2gYtg{Esab@w?n9 zyocNUvy}(_VzK#Gi}}9+p8@_0_^iba@i`l=y^3Vwu!zUyBYKxJ$#V)Y@RvS*^dnL{Pu;Cic%}1}X;pj(!MT><` zT5NvCV(Y62-)J#bLHK5inQvK4-)b>(8{)rXF&)%1G#wf%VmV+jwI|~Dve?<%V*RBS z6Z=`L0)6=1p4@WqR#?m(Yq7k_V&OQ8$yY-DdW)GiSj@l4V(2`J&9_=Cz0G2Fy~W71 z#ptZX)+USPi!D|zv6#zRtZ%khy3}G6&&`tW0WW7UeYwTP2Q2#WzC(w2wUs9e-~pr8 z*l_G)NcVBX1M@{2PT)P;#Aj_d{AKWNv>5-o#pEw6Mjo;l{f))U?<_Wfp+DJh@(GKH zzajqb2tR4D_z#PPr!3a-9g@n^HXMD%V#sgrH^aMGtnFbjxtGO6&|(vqd5I0@mx6b& z#nd4d(}!8C91c9fV)!Uv#9{&W>5W&|aP&Bfkyl#G#w@l@wpcmcV)wNcYiC+4o^3Jo zMvG}Yw+g)pycuA|V)P<}H(3n6&tmKS7Ry&yjN~nLKV-3TmBr@O7GnjAWnk+%8;*Y7 zV(tqTtJhmBRxAd;jri|a^ncG{;s+L6Kd~78sl^g7jqlpGere^Y-vNJbG5Dm#1~B`q z4Yz>J=WICfyv5=R79)%7{FvX?Vq-gt&0>B(i{X&PE-)Ro;RY~!s0~*R zvzR^HV(kcv{-Z1gS6HkZZ?SwLFlMoHip9cfEr#DDFN)` z6tG_sAD;g`&taZFv2JE|a?SY>SvcU5`;yQyJHI7wu=yVGg;y_6AMn8Yg<{qd^Xlu} z;5qu5FSGi}(D%NBX8w8q9vAlRvlgOn8FUGVebm>5zV_GOzpi!5ei!L@+FxleyS(Lp zEGF>_$**_dOUUMu{KDH?`_o^u{bAg^0`5SB1W-t~xTfwzn1SrJr7Q%{fo&c($Kt=HfSW zK6idv$Fu#U4&8I*asK^E5-;_$z5HP=;+PHk&R;!~#qrOc9o>V`?kl!lp15X@74_Qh zuN1oI>20)_zlqdm-lku3(uNCqTBSVH(}A8dKD76NN5*b?oe(5G_;stljQG-h*Nz>Z z{9NxyrNqY%8n$E6A8X(L+ao9R_esjT*m#!rftNr1@ZLwaFQk6{-WTSsLtzss+trhk0iKdxtd@f*YbKl=NJ?z88n=ikft7|z>J|3}V=UVT&j)*W;_ z^*{Q92hM%sML&HRW}&#`Q@*dzIo~o{qd0T)PMY^PB`SH z-?E60(A@$7Hc?(oCk+;P^|dhf#b@<%-D_dWl1K=Fl#0{!|ABY(!f_wz43^X8Afr}wUd zq>mqi{Ly}nJ@F4;yX>JWzs&p@&-{;m;`Jwm&Oi1&I-dGp^tx61{By@WzasHl?eFWx z*PoBc$+e^SP3zB3{rdXO2O1B(mHE^lXFXLO|F08&mi<((9nYH&CTTYx-_16k9lrhe z(?>lX*@O9nA!j~2-u9b!zy8QAA7*^?#i$RApHKZF_`t1y4Dx-0MU3b8x$dIhUBB1t z!w<|!4}ZV#`)AHxyXArYz9!StpL-p#bmz{EUwBZbr=Qw4eQ?7~Fer*}lIoPyH-kwDI;!cH8ej?i(*+Jj?e?_V`fg zvg^M={cTmg$;fw}_~P0B(H~D681I<>`|7uyxbjzTIf&_f%h4Y&AH3oV55NDBGvD~1 zI-c|UH7gI;a@`Y?{rRt-9_`};iAH7diUaaGJ;(bW|Fia%OLsi1-yi$w(LNr(c)O48 z^YRZT=A=h_?rpEV`lHtzv|h)ve8uS#&U$w+dky1@YCOI6AFsJ$Q~04v7~fLyzq|I7 zkG&!?@fXI|u)bygxHS9q{XV>Z^;8|t@$v`z{w-Nsbm)f|pRW$Lzeo02dBy2_-q&xR zEwn%CKWDca-Wh(?d;9Y>cdO{;+x5A3b$&jq&9@ zZ2qjDcLzVe{52;8>x{1>p5?#tRcr3MId$cN*Q2XM5iS|;sILvXn{Ry8d$ZsD=+#1T z+x%1G&wb&Mf9$H`*+k80Cyb~5i)TNx`;}k&pI1?TR_TB2q}!i)(anGBtq;UM8T|e=+xvsNUi{}PKXOlh zyktD}M=!YNC1~@S#sr7O3+EXJ-@BQhmI-dHs?D5)zo_yV{Co;aM z^pBq#-07+Jyl_6_8~Y90|NQ6P`?bgJ|J41RH2aDP1V1#Eh@?^i$J zyYHmH?Y-Mp@qZlg^#2ZfUcdI`6X*5&KjYc|{}TDj(jWbOyWV)@rf2^@?5%sQea${c z+)MkIp8db_{u>XRy6&O=dWG@q|F`9@yyacB6$j|_?EjlDd)Ic`d~E0IbUgci`M6g! zpXu)KV;#@_|NYE^SN`jR+xG8gnLqvWuag%ojqG{zVy3U`KJ5QxUpegh?|$LS{q_-4 z_1`RQ|G^th-6zKM9W~$7e({f`ca(SRuXh;F_VI5&Kku#&-8sxzZhsFg{mA;q z|Ld~L7@t%52fy)(Q{OiBuN!qd^~X_OUc1d{jBhIaf5@J3!hfa`A7Fe!jbF__{qmzf3?J6Ne=qGnT)qbm zYTy0L_x9RL(wqB=Emz4O<|5`Xk2HZ{>_f$YMPM5k#X2w#Yy!hrU&euHU>?{2a{nTV zeG2YZBoWR6i@++d3G4!cxDSp3lfW#n3M>Mfz##5#y9h@S&H{P=TST}DYy!K$AnxCy zz$7pWYyo+n7sq`V@5j;z=XrkytOMJ?FxLOP&xs?P2IhHx0IUQ3-?IInjc^#@I4}*& z1IxfVunqKM{TT+vfoZNwfq7sZ=*Rl3jc^#@G%ya#1IxfVFnF7_KMG6&v%n&-3Ty(q zz#!HcQD7371r~u#U=`Q}Mlla_J&{DX2+RVjz%H-}3}PNk0y*zy5v~G@z$UN@41NdY z2PT18U=dgaHi2DW5aVnVm;`2lMPL(H1$Kc^j6)nxlL!}qSzr~|1vY`fJ7GUi#vC*L zcs?%}-;{m*Q2aIFikN0CW%tM7GmdABz0QWPzZ_I9E;}cl-<@T~+uJbq_a9-s6*2H~z z2j?#HL7R^IgWRV}!Hx#j<($77SSK}*p6gcef;lhZ^Z(HLD-0BQZ+_g{=2OLYLC@Rm z-S6G)!LRo2pQL_z6Q$u2mq_9kHi(<7BwRKu?R$H=7yXFgtnj z`0V8DS<}PKrl+?Jz5cqjulDTbP5*x3b$3c~qjw9-N7U_w?S$=t_0M`|{pxyU{jr{O zy~JQo3J80i-Ua0%?u_vC%*iv;Yd6hK%?wKE_KObm9J=kDe|yQ*CG0ya_U(Z5y@j9o zySKoHOxi~V_YtulS^r3s$RjUBI~tQWVW1Xnwr4=Ln<4bHiQoiWL@B{6ooe7L1 zb!BG&{&(${_R97^Ou>IyU>Vp1c7T59j{+0GG%yD&0xQ54unVN!A?OXOiNWFY6l~nS_kcTN_{}MfaMd(X?sm~{Nl@lpuN;f`4J+( zC3gYDCWS9VsP$8u`#(@}Gmew*iK~#f}2flV3*IHB`W)mG<6|J;_FNWER$ z-$oEm`5WX9bJ1_|x9EAZ{9!J(3;A2@NFhD>S%h7lq(4Uzn2Uaszg_v>BEThjtI$J! z17VjZ=?jpzfucg>E!6^yFs|c6pK?^->S@QttL!(OZQc@*4=dJkeW#ybYw@BF53cL&Np`M;JF^DAg=?dm*;ysN=|>i zO^CQe59RNm(4g26df57h{3yaM&rLtB(r3Y^+$((oyaG_vh~CytcD}1B`L%F3pqH!g zKLx=B%8oYD_xX?5a=AQ7{|ON2ciKU@+rE1B4?W~35q5c^HwbwKNWE>WONvTH$eEu6#f~`Alb=G^nxC;8PNCrWyeN3cKMR(8Bk2SE>H4fdUu?W^l|Vh_eviEF9oDsfyJ2rl$`m!L5R3qJ1(Hmpx9AGdh#0xyF54j zxhj3&cedP=d!=tfZy0=0BYGP+&y`Se&O2;ZHAEAuj-_w~FV9 zRV9A}1*6}{r`**qcC?Yc&;NrhugeoVf{+ubw}JBsF~n2;3lBRe=XfA|u_J@@v?GtO z%M&|FkQ13-eqY;v>dKBX&sV7N;S$)V+refCt`)_&#J)g#xE+KMc6nkS)3aVhg)2Xh zN)3wMH1v?4L)hg>`WWOzAoZr;|C*A&9Qn|ni zx$jT5{M5_$%)&~(yAaH!+X3Y_*y!H>Vn-6`$H{!&imAxg&y(?2)jJdn}ECw zq+Y(y*HH5BqhM^`+*0c6pM%3VGm(;rR%M-mt$U8vl&GG*CFT>@&M+oMk zz4Eu{xmW%$*U1)o|BD@Qq$fXxu*;M5)Vr&b-j%O%*vrc6pLM3wZ-5YDC_^ zeOXt@cQudd<)Xdvx9|^y{8$m-5<9|w9Ucc_2)jH?UQyx7U4Mw)9Q2T1MA+p? z`XuBPAoW&puAr&pTt6;D8OW#H^`F?`@7VH@A41sWi5*eMiPX#Y6;p_(oa4Xt^YyTc z_Yo2lI|@ioei>nxCw5RT+r7^3KvCwome(hTt8_j?h!qKjcRdc6pNDlOVAFQ7`4EDZN?fA-{mI%M-l`$jddCjomVg-PggV+$((vycST*5WOM1*Y5x4aJ%0RcCwzyr@x3ImvTgrp8N#DE>H5? zAA0qAnsS#fdJE7)e%V8B8uA*D_ExaJ)>d+!*Wx;#e9Cu)odRM_v1h~YG64H}jMcCzu9Zb*pK~%VM?dLA^kRNz@xPLHx z1H3TeDG%ZO{)Cc01ViaJ@+s#yDRL=a4(Z7+BJA>{92Llk)LY!u-hVZf9lwMf^c(q) zL2$naaETrMXKeY&4(VK!E^0NrLJV_sgya1%$0-ygY`Q@;K z_LBbr2)-@?Tw+HX>HGYD+48zPvEvF5bUUY9x1$*Jke@`@<%!-Ps_`B@+sd3WfPF{)sde37Q!x1^6NrQq}~+HyM>;$exdv!`NLd&znQ;9&m%pl&vye* zK z&J+PIu_J=?#S-cn5Qu5bIgxrBxX+_{Ke6ORR z>{#Vt$0?Az_XlD}P1(^z*yZ*7iS*h}%~k>-vXapQ@fucqXSJ<7K?<%!-9fA7*N!R-Z<_@(n`J(`Oxp=bAOWKmdK?XMWiRcg0Rbz z{OXYFb5JF`SKLu{TnB~JOFO;@0p|hQ5!!yZKSU9Bd143kvi_-;a(7=x%9n*6@(T#N zJkgtgybPq?68d{X$@dn5x!z`>_rK_&{1c8`?C|+*`N$6o@Wf2)jJd8-P3wq~0o?n--Lu-(A%E!>m7+L-dFpO{AyX>$wfnzgQCD68k9MpF)G8 zH@KrMANdi4U7n=xApbbxMUBWKc%Lw%Dw zKb|YJfl2J6hq$kdebGEHjs3?Cuz~%y3ig|#*pCTff1(S_;Xb_x4B>vV49w$xunKGd z+rSL&W1?8^2eJO`0-IRxRk04rVLjl-yx9iUF)x%cp4EVPj2i*;haxcLw14Rrt-EbI z$vSe=FFe2Rk=Zb_adKkg3`DCmdPLHBJ#VB1>A4* zdp!JJr2dXm4(C?+ogRLdJc4sB{JxFX_nr8in;PB^obNkNE$nY*aBe$}d5_XyUi2LvD2Uu6_UWGp}f_eR1!zOp?Bhczz%1_`N>*wmX0Ni<^Wj_V9Z+#GR}f z-!$!+9W+eQ=iklR5eEM3OP8Pd{NXo01ASXwhV(>!7lz*z;QRM{f4z<0^W=Nhd>@nV z`|&*~zGuYubohP)&%^UPInQJB94ycO@mva@yYsm)pJ(!UAfKCYpOX7?+?V1$6!)FD zU*bnOc;CbO4z6Fhp5uCm^QX8=+Dj7t%mU$0&v9eT%)}cuZkU?BU{F0isULptt-iah zr$;N#W`2F@Raa2oj%X-E-p9^txL|yGX8MTrJ1)r)Q=nCXbw$ znZ9^(dZYP>*11y~(ve0aLeEG^_ zLaSFVACE3yKE5Jy^qQl`mq*sFT()BQvgq0sE00;TX7%Lc#CUXaa@mSilPf0IL?g?W zFI%y4)w0P|Yu6q#u`;r1<;471E&u;4D{&MqsTY3tC%A|8r$kA=DS<=04&kl)aoxn<%Jh#hsLT>Rco>czw5 z`Yg&pWcjvUuBqvblN+YT*V&da`+urnu)Wuxa2_tY=WzK_;1JJ8_@wF3_^kOD-mEm> z(9{}f?Q5qdXG0s)lcCA%_{7FgX2azADMJa3Pp>h7shJH^8#jk8+B7*U?LBl!+WY`i zNSgoDI;&)3Xv1V?X2ZtWBSXDh#4e71!M%pMl-aalGBj(3l1;Or*-e?uI;o54Ni+JGQ7L3I7kl~ribQbO zpBdOkoax&;HH(rPLrh&6k0P7#bu-h(rrD6`bA$Tb&>QSRYs~CCwQiu02Su4!H$JsKG-HIlB1%Hjb~auzbHs#c(o<_pFf=tO&`2Kk6 zCBy#P4)YmtTZFehURj@=WpX^#^wxRDtN+WVGU+FL|F^CD$9f~a4)u7_pelNUyJ=o_ zUYCAu2D;ghbQUwH$oSZ+S<{X}Xp(9rfacU2U-J=Pu_Hof&mUN?SCk$6IxF#_z8z+0 zSY!IM8S2f*iy?G+X2W_ju$gbEn!aP2??y8h&=MKX%v{kMsZG=-^Xq`2jWcxX)TPoZ zjO#cm4*QHQ>*X%?@_c@D>9F6{!9L>K5k5I>J{rkk3f0o@Ty{(oSIUiyuLSP+8NTUW*ke!PM$+=D?49>=S;+t5Z-z}yB za>Mw#)9ebcgwW0pl%tysH!;^?DSMvq>;_Gq)FK4$HTWh>XNTD3MhzIq~Z z%y?vS znhD?Tnp5J*Hq;AaWh1`UlVJ2KFDekNua(er(pI z!y`i|ZB{5Vt7j)STs*$o^wHIm>G6xrTJ&(Uyu*yXW=8s`5lowvYi8Z}bgwmqjM3{i ztsA$iE{U3)*wkCOn$?@R#|!m6DSqUAa7EckyNDMeRd1ZOD@u%Mb{yI%9sIjW_HGaX(}NMSn#RX z$@7c81BdN=E9@fj`D||;H9YgqnyNPo%-+q2%r*Uqcf%$byLpFhvX}N}W+Kx*re@Qo zKz6wkT5H_RdlAW2?Bcn@va;**u#5OPgttCko3-P#8KqA#>;8+!*O`@Qf3We`B>3NT zi`%nS%E$9?v6l_|ozEwT^nZf)b(|y3&|rENTDH`>S@*~t;^5|rtDwRCl{>#) zP0Xym(A*<9ju*SQuM~RuuwDNSKNBxU*o;%=?$XKCw1A7pH%#@$fc|>BHUget`L%VHY zy6LQOtLfOY$C<$-v}xKzZJ3pN`SIzu%dlu>7IP0~8l4%W%%XdCV#Czx$u)i7OSWPs z_ZJff58F8byNIh1w(Un6vrGw76H@26**;>m`4s@OWR^Xg{xaXpF>6h$pY2shXuY}X zoLPf$+1wyY3o-UNC3g)J`}kbDJ8a*Um%tuk9Q#ip?$co3p$LrPzP=4C;65~t`Y`J741`P@m%`5a2i19%>#<$O-1<$P|X<$R8% z<$SKC<^1lbmWOaoP|Nv!P%UraIhghvpQC9$zwfE#IgfnfI2We*{Cy2APr)87FX6eF zwzGimjcPfc^JzW&eU~|MJfG8g_Vmh*Q+w4C2z(((YFBWip2y&TQw z_g%D{-&@ggK4;SU`8zk7&)+}M@&eA?YB`^qYB|3@qUHP@5H06(S1sprSS{!G9JHLz zYqdO$=egPs{5=uP&*A$inxDbGjF$7cotE>tvDVM`S~Z`~`?Q?DKcw~W{WUFb;M~5} z!}qW>pU<(iJmt~f`Tm6F^LKN!oX;z@J$%nW^Z9!&TF&2d(Q-at*K$4w)%o&weKeov z+i&fkU7a=(Xuo(Ir;o)6G+o)^$^{{EDf^LK6L$T81qInNsPL-2!^ z^Bjhj^W2}7^Sp+Z^L(BwH-B&8z7es5b(sH9yB-Sxqre0(4a@raaKQIbR0Mo!6un4RG z>%bPU3k)2I@&jYQBrpTa153avumNlXeMh1Ezz8r7OaZgN0unhfl*)r zmR5gHh~?W ze+9}9i~@Q8(Lg^*IC9gUp5{14^yB{IWV6F!9zF2!OHb;aYbhOL^LzF8<4e}(ukJmD z7JV;5dg2m56UO;4V*apQ(rNPIrg*MOc5@Q!`YE`IX+#m5i$ms50z56Dt zleN5t^)}B1OCsTOU8MOu=cf5Q-=^jK-B+!L^O}|yu#VDtIFGn|^Y<2eGGuTrEq1K+ za}t;V=7A+(71#i_fxal(8<748AwJ^BP5w{s0WTAGN7!t@%I=wY>UQe%>CTZMcy5d3-5z>fkb2^MpnsLMTjEEhryiZ2_l5C!((mFX z#NU!X?+5cLJJio|%iLM$+&-<-?p@RG*s$iN z(CjND(3=+!&vVb$p8chVZ@cgvcS*e1!}=iZDiP)~yW{4$&Ey(ukUQI0y}lD|`9i?j z7wflgY#sjtNo(|O5!6@Dzxe&gEYb-__~u{lB38G(xc9!j2qhiQpO&3;BIkaut54)S z*Qw>)2i9`_9-)@!uy3a2e9u736T8@R`&wSW{hgL`eWm66{Xi|}@9t?i_ocO*`_fv@ zeQ7Q4;5`B@=ecz)=RUTU^L(e4r*<6eAMSf=KF`N%Irqc0ocrNgp1}JSy8UpUT=RMU zQ_FMMH`aP0SZ8W}#iQP%_#Ut3H$3!k{?dG&`_yu-Gw4CcnE$8zEE$8zEE$8zEE$4bu%OfMk zIT@GuUWexMd4!h7jvn1#c#c-{Qy%S;?~!PJ8ow{7<$MmJ<$MmJuW9N`bNv+_};#j^Er-|2R+(3-`mlAzQ?2GJg2Jr zSIDdXdiXQrG5+vAN9UWw`)4}el1Dq_x>oC{VZ7CHKDW|x-ZyD^9s9#t&i9mw-+xr=IzFet_!spUcZ4xg6CJjT_c$9g7! z=bKtj)`QP;(|Y`gdGu?)$2i0H9Cf~Y-m2yNp7k6#)*IR$AHJiY`TVZ3mS;Tbi_dd4 zpU-o(yy`Ljw_oJZ@9=wP+Wz*gqxnUTcIfk%$N79&+sXGzwVdaEwVeCFTAssvs_p0V zYt85LYb`H%+{fi!JlYR@4_52xV1Cqco)gw`?nh~P5bIT4uC7Oa31MBQ_3-(-mUACV z%X$7*%lTYh%XuzV%Tpfhf!~$XOgtv92h2 z+(&dg*7FgZo6`Ej9{1x-kN#UYX!LlPJl6R<2cr3DkABDJ zdYaGkAzB{uSns7g?B{uJSC84V^!%R1$?MEIBTTpU-U&5^i;qyGWmh-&N9J$B+9KUy>`6Z9`62ZA$%}?R`^I9J8*dO9|GBm&G zu@AxXN}A8}N?OkIN?Oiy>RQfoOj^$GcxXA#H_efIj9Vp-e#Uc8T2BY-SuHPnjB`9E zrTKA>ahKmE(fo?XxX$NgnxF9C^ZA(O^E)W6+>8TTow?(-ViVfOaRls9Iyzi0PDaO zunP>FjPe6xz$7pO%mYinDzE`;1AVVX`GFB&9GC)Tfdyb0SOYeJ9iaadlph!cCV**R z4p;zDdeqa=s0H%RCU=dgW)`2Zx7Z^ATvEn;X{M}Qw@e)J>D(EQepm7_@!R;vt=#DDUFV&g}d5&bahZA33|K?L35VF|Ab1X!jKQ(W8T6>%$B%&`4eQDrzXTJO5 zS6%#ucS7Hs`-Jdk?R{wj*Z~SZV!q=_IoDS#2T^#ugwOQcpCgY*uAuOlKll5|Bf5Me zn`3_);i*lTe;*f zx{nN&dVaCkD!BSHKKV_)?z{gt^bmauJ2ct5^Tv^LZ$FL~;d%&;0p3lsux#H?leQ zCnv36^1v!k(urTVPa1~24b=UO`z6HqA)9*V($c^@unZLaVn2D@*QMP=;qeka)AKwD zc|>vrh0lC>|4ANE^V6`8`{CpfUA~cRVR?z!wbq|yU=!%Sz{(}P_?7!FF~mm^Kc8RA z91l?sL8Q+(`g`YRFg_L?xjVn{y@>cz|FiE`*Z!h+jNX*TbG|%tW=-Pl?#Dw-IYeI@ z`u%BJzB7KZ&r5&zl~4U%%4y=ai9&94_pW1tZ<~4JYcDue0zG>W&-wEF3pRZ#^WYxS z5^vIY+Oyuno-Fhgfj3>T^Y!;FdHM~|H|P8$?UH!$TOH}zK&10L*LtS;%$acHlJf9- zs-Y?CkMAwN@H2l(9sn4F$9uRjP8m*^`%PX)OCuJgX|s?42-2xV*fCO!1EpvQNiE$3@ad+oP!4?O#< z=rj3=&fcX_ghn=J97;fsM&Sp1i~9S(OdpUx%th4s{Qn&mTcrIk-wMhj@~CgDFXz0G zL3|0w_7;EpV4M(rJYSY_04`SJ=y*3iQus56|It9DAg`X$Q+M`S22ZIX)6& z>ufo_P|`{|eD=-cU@z(?iq!Ql?MOjC%Tq*H`g3aq!~ zAqvm6i~1tq(Jrrg=XsVS_+I(ydiKhjDc%=bs*K#}Tyi zkRvyK^gLH@zO%YfzAWf9o^gE4Lf;wB-Tvl3eXiYm4b1eLZHsZcE~DSYFCyppY`0!V z)n@~G+m5|54)J`P^|SHD4BGMOHoyDuASw*GJD*D$xr`oP6!8)kyRzHZ^^&$Xdz#hD z=Uc)Tdsz>}9P|}|w43E5N_r^=&!b26-Ul(p$H&939BL%Hhil)$_K2&RoBb z@^2jJXeaIBc@^4~0x$ioVY~8>d)ZY~cJVy1>xWTxvEExwdhr*}L(#4-;tSUe*L&z9 z>kluxB8V3~l0WN@sOyn-&~Bon7rXeLhJ>Xav(Vpe4*RP*k6m?T7sp#7>x=d54R2HABEh@FL9~J7_nN{^B_{+7+I){_0+A`#<|#8gegxWf3oWM)`&HMSFy2=Cy5ko`iNC zf9l5mE2iQ%#tUECQw{mFfwa%RaqI0oh^~rNz%va>2>}GwYob+N>2G0p4U9X)Z z-v4|1{uAvg&0|-^(JOZGK5U_Ob)EELR}JUnX;)yA^-JJ#)&3#(s?Rv$MUU9U^X?0^ ztKg&;yLjG*c9jud!TtjM)tJYwmZMkdi|w8`r~QLZyNP0lv_GCtqWrCY`hG&<P7 zJgWc`=+|vv4(%d{`fUI+@Q)w%lpMQ^zkC&}7b}k3*!wisbwtizr@vl2V=vSG`uhi| z&DM{PJv#gG&XqI0#{{B>@8c7>53pu(V%?eJ8RzLiufHwILr)o4`SZt*So)E7UMM-5 z{QCDfe4o|i(Z9^!bM{NR&?6*MzdM#*W80U6&G!$+SUzI(QduY!nY z{_zof*G}q{{CG(`$0O=-^OJJW-^3E~sR2co=;8ArFFn*t^uJ@!-c9|Fb-#|^^K$l$ zrM$s|?L0;Ow3m8_Vu$gokM%2I6F0~H$kkR~VK{$Z3gMC?H~N;O@`HL3dnyOn^n4CQ zztRqdX%Bg{hdg5FokM=`b&!9=kxRMgSL$JX5Yyn-PqgbH;fY`4us5sp@w*?wllEA3 z;$@$e@yxeG{SMFEr*Fr2mYe0`;)wF5lTP$A9eD}HziZ$R;W3_iTJTR)@#tsr>)@q^ zc#Fr_j;Jq>c-k%gkp9SaL|%nFhbZ=u$MVFHZ_~+F`o~_P*j(f}YI^OIVPg2*13yST zR!8&?X&2Nhx+Tot7nQKlHK+aOptmrrf6)FNx#-(R6yXwmw2#O{dOF==-H1- z434rZ{2p6gul5^7yr>a<`#btfc*m?0FZIHB`a6aAyu*|BOS@RlEZ0)#r@ZK-6a7rb z_7*^VP4ToIw%@Me(a+RZhyOykK|7Fk$@->Uam3SZF!tv)`FJPf2?`SO~bpE~X>;-#e&B zqh|^CrGk!J>VtY%A05~mb$HUxYLF)!xs)d{Y0JZUXZ{++R4Gr=qddI_99t<*)5+H@ zPur18d8miwsUhC~z9E133Xq2!xv_ap{bs?7J3N!m4gvV%<*=FMPYv^YI=+l_dBtNp zWB*8jS8;e!4-v?lj=Z-{*m2?YAnoTc*ex)s-0}Bsyr$GXE4Kd?Qv9J$!Bj7At7Wk=}pp?1)>BjU)#4(g#DY)1))Cw8zM zr5*VwfBF$$aCmMzIs$gH9hHZ9J{_M!xf_bdde!Zy>+r5DXnDM^5uVtUfZmLw-}rw= z_rAxh6SikP(@z!fSzgg6JiTtNjpPm1!_-#$v67M4?$Hf`XK?Hqjq#ZcJ?nsAK#B*Ixn>4 z8PpfYb*}5(a*N;Uu&1l+=lf+W@7D5@anl`lq@A(f(;n6%?MZ*g`Zo&{p4bybIPb`% z{QQ0o+u?lnxb0l*amOF2NA_>p(?x#%s|NkM=O4&}j$G{Fcez-u`RvjD;C(ss&qF`Q zH~J$9c~R$&?? zP9k=9v7heBd-~rweE-IB=zK)KkR{!#0Ie!FuN zjB2OBYplN_K+z|5>F-#wyh-pJwLQB=eK%~BU;Fd8qhOR@E6Atr*d^_a`vRR|`PiuM z07?F=f7VC8-c|nOv7C{QTEE1B;up!E_mde%ZdA=_r$NLQ9iAzt=X_Cdc;bJ4FO>5I z?P`MOnD2Af-JB1_US95eF)Ci{=R81+e9V@g_iYJ;-RDc7Qmj5b0m@8_q)MU8Y|9_qD!jtv`Nt$D204chA57 zSqNLRL(j)yq>lq7z4(XgJ(f3vcz3-gJhlUlcU&ju9evV&xSv%~a_%p=ejjCj6X`lm zdbeM(AJbp{qV)^QqvPA~dqnX#AFw>U4@o+_-Z*))9gl-*pC$*MDMSAfKEJ!WkbdCy zYueFQX8w?P+R6HHyI#y>pV#(>pSu!JSsig4cjr-cfyzU9K`dqJoJlv zR6D97-m4wajx2Z$N1ymHihSabv;19zUB62?7$(vWw42`e z9mR)j9K`*YzF$s&@8&1#)KX;Y z&t1w$H)oxyo)5D=sw46de>ZO&?l@LO<+3hkKP2-0RF4Df-^@S!S?iY=Q1X%b zq8|D`fcUh-llsalJIODA=lXBd{3iMFlJ-dZh}@@Qdu&55_o?*!#B@Zx4(EKub&a04 zIPb(iH|Xcm&Z&=n;e6$mPk4HqEjfBvPVujv2lL?79lrQCjQ-$rNu?OW2=u&+vZ@$}RrU>*ECC-TM+LFMmg(1AEx-(%`%0k$x0a z9HvN95P5KkV}^q&~#H`Yj9V=c(&Q_w&3;Py4dqD}Ri|N6u4& z_Q~`Or00C4{l<35{nR%2!V^D)RX(hzKzZbNFs9d|IzQT#MtZ$Zs(;Ue{G3OAdVk6* zzb4X$)$`4w+TUXNIwSHEe-yDEU0}Nyi{ZPD?szq79Lavk`g6`Wg7vo^M+)G(?V{JO zcH8>%298_eC(~|yZRl~wZ@I7H_(J_erYE}VXSZCex8Rp;xgtPaKh)F3^TD*klk&vX zeJAx6z@uGWdU@ZZ#{>QQDzu|LLa*47{kHAj3$6FAYFFAmmLu~O>mS`Nn<_oqWgdLD z+@t0L$&Z)e&Y2Im?rT9G_pS7N!2MFqtn~zi}QUa-WOqWwCb@kLzI0pTZNr@Els|hOPUB z`y8(Q;ur2)u$+15DGlixtoPWix$jqZc;b&D_Wh!eQ*Q@hH-8x~_*~FyeaUtm|C%k| z@H%TSKk0cV1-|%6?BaaNagTQ8!BcjP@%MCwpMTH24`?C%LZ54Qm0ew|>r(2ucIZZ1 zUTqiGIm7*6?m8)p^tyf5J=%9+M1CgkIs4N*FUa=FelC7Ce9!apiF2l>_+e}_zVvT% zgB4rOy*}}ot16#+{1c)_;$x79yLSHh$Xj0jgQw$ne^272K2wONf4orm(#~?=yYrGs zGiTpftxNr!x9UhQ`bLc>ZN$6dkK4c4J}cDo_2K@i??c0gXSrAoK3`2Z=}r0kOt0Uc zV*io!^8BFeq!arX&;C$Ad{yyy|EtSUAL7lu@9rR8mxIq~gWnkVLF$9!A~B2fF^6aD z_Iys8ba>KE_`IWy_RVtUz*BaO>HA0ceXOqTD=E*9kW0S&-3IFCeGJ2FSE5JC%`lPs z9D3YmnDZv=@P%%&eoO#GF6%DV8}sM*&2gV$?vHq-qun}P*~w4Z6Z2!cDj>c!#GCt` zS@4@^2h7MAV&?b$`2hMQ=D}k*i0P5M!8l3#{IIJ)elOp_yhwdq_f-{-{f_!NXjd)8 zqy6kZT%Y=H9<+b)AM>NWCiF!dp0uyDYIo!(!E@Z$TPFmu-t@X}V85s!z20|?BE6nJ z>m%~(jnB8(^8qXm?a?UhO~&WYE!Ge2_-y23ZM9z|e51qjcO1qunMwX|g3KfJm)ZT_ z9Q6Nc|CjuB#XIl6S@ejVWysk-SWjMd*1@0e98;I&`H)+`BcA_!%f|O7L}Qn<1KPoQ zNkd;0e6incFKkx{@KO#>%2`)_q~1L97lpXQ?{T$%AW?39Y;P^3*Z1A}yb<}`5&4OI zTyHJpIg;3?&q32Z)+5W8t6KlM@1;t5eLuwX^dr;PkluYSQ0|XjE(y#<9@~q^%-?g? z6~0>s?LhL^`vj8C%+Gzj)Wdm@n1mknUS0n^*7R^b{r6Jc_tPYwBP0V{VlVX*YtWKJb&Yw-w5tj+&9} zE#st@_Lfxl|DsOX0rfJx68Q*>Y8Q3rZ4T@2x4*U{7yZ2-%z;kPN4tsPZx708?CiJK zs3R9W$IW9`27Isfnp66Ycl1g7tvT^hFN|lslo8)>c+!4p7uy5NwF>$vZ#n5iKhv?j zB@yqxW8e?r&C&A?8y{0V`kDFy(3c+KEgoZi)2;&IX}6dy?U(I6+8M*d$ae;QkoFt&Xus4e>ZP5WjC=%)t~ujc9(s$z`upv-?8rsm zDM}yhBeosB+kU%_T=bl-^l+RdM!svy>(zc^h!-`Y?+izu3GbM5;-y{~Pk*NoUvPNR zerXr$ndLeS`YA6t=|n%%vAqQmUspV>hvToWHmG0GM?X_v1O5vS@fMGrr0hx{o_0&L zv|qLZ+MgxQAxggF(N7uVTXOOhf1inb1&oS0?WzO5u0Oti@4ItQUeR~9(nqt1F^6y3 zRsX&Dgd-RGsfYISJ>`tUlXl5-oq0ztcD!L8JL(SKwWI0C#SZGB9ehu@>+r;m{yEa` z4g4|6pB1EwIy{q4|Gxh$*vd)`N5_$i9n?cR*e(J;7}USm!FCaL+oGW{68Gjx7a~Fw1e#;?C``6wu_h}H)WnP{;-s%)oB8i^?$1r{nV|cT@3Luex3M?j9<) zumAqDBNw~3gB`>U)*pV1Pa(9&DDqD@>D}_M9K`f6ZxQQ1f%R`4>)Ep6ErUG;+~@hh zZz$e@;Dxv^1AbTWxPIYxS(?~y3;kr^A5)G++e06}%Tfd{?(lm1ocO(C{auy}cx?Zo z&a}@Zfmhpe7!sCtM*r+00&~@oPM`N^s_)W~-yD&TX_sUC-Da=-cjg8GkRRuiuY~k^|CZnB=6*cOR~?a`v{U9!be{`LzvOfNOn%s& zCDzUT=a7+~+W7gNqw;)N9DGqDc5u8T@;RCM-emv1zTyJY^E;E0kNB7G<26-!mY?W; zU(%#o!hRgQci0cRi(+$eeDfhbs(6fN{qsG(gu@emb3D!t%lrAe&xwW4akJ|1NBR@- z4TtBBGi)bp&+TDezn&RigZ~1JVSnso-O>L}ANLKS!@NcGX8?LKz?8$2aiR9j(dVu5 z;IY0W+a4e1jTU&Gbd2Zty!tomEpVSLr+&Ux_4vL`7<_FXf6tnJWIT~_DUZ}|4tm(1 zMK0qV{l|K%fH&XyI@U)We9G z!sEEldJaBd?H=aMJ)hzOF9x*v4$d7=Uj=rh9iFt$D(WSJc(#|qi2S9TP4)c;lylDe zJ6s>==eV?o`Lt=z&uw`{pV*arkv-?cen5U0Jl8K$f1KZlJV)q5{fl0)pWnxK=UpT3 zzu&-m5Wb8DdfcrcfA@Td@R*L}D}&c`$|bxVM6tQZE7HCP2jv$Y+b4NEUl?|H;-@Ia ziyZP{e@TGn`bpMzeta)QY><4YpW{jy=~#cllYG+ZoI3f{5&4Lp^XmCJ^W*r+`V9QS zmV2Sk@x$Qv?Na$rZvs5G{9;!S^B&t3?V95Uq}S`fFy3EeditT}kzc%Rzc=fi=M+0A zcfViY%H4ICj92b@OX`i~q}}|ERH`{>M@ChBy*&vj76Nk6K; z6%pTbcqX6z{xto>{5r$DIqRS};)4$j>=C{lr`<`1=lUh*$Vb`D z`H$ZT7k`=b{dQY((u*J6?|+LQ_mKqVq93^~_dPNwpKDLRkxM--waI(`i~fWYFZvlz z{ak;g9G+WG8Am>lpepQhsNg>q3J?e;x7>=(ALup=L3 zcNzI49G+{po=4KdygBns5bdj=cpSHBH|w+N@MNCg`-6OsgZ^lNXUfpOO#N)n^YI){ zB~t2_={Rmge`)=r=cTM#?~3Z@cRLSd70yC8R-{#?!N}U*x#F%@jjeB z_un32mucTi;(@JyKPdLA(dCb-a{&GFgRjf)$9ebp{9Q(ReSe|PAJShnkNo%@rTOkJ zg1@%qTj>2o1bq6t=<(h_5~Pxy{Zd1` z*Zm)P+_!BieQXbGhupXI{dQ1($(QYc<<3D*Sn=2%sE_kEtKr*&djl^}~H2u}ji(y%+rbpdE~Azdppr9G=Oif1ky1 ziTNdmd2{wDct4R-Jl#%dciG{&@UnO zG0f}tC&qJ~n^ipBpJ;c<;YmB#H zB;U?Eti5fOj^!otcel7M?3WwA(-!*Epxn}*ct6ehh%?@~zm#I*<$)8QEt=B!7!uc6xk&qId)JZJ}! zp2Z-#zjtQZ-x7}7X(yeOcYkq^xo98Ht>hh^v|r9+B}YCg-wga9I^BF*PCCi=Kp~im z`SP5K?}<0tDp9>L=x-H+sj?YM-3x z=vN}&r{eog!jtrMoFl0^dPmg{f1k>I|4GWl@whurdj6i6`aP)rcpUxfz%Qf9&G&I& zcYi$2s&p(bk?-B;e#rN`Do%RYpIjvw;FA5xjuS8Kp7E@&CgVE;`(?a77CP7-S+6UV zJm91g{Y=O4un7H8#nXB?US||<1@fc56!aB`c#Fr_4ry-<@w8jih<(eHz7X`amA=Ek zqrSl3tbh6o80b3+Jo>YRb`%9)q9xxWz|;LUrFhJj`byB3cX-n7IS%XhrFcF}vK!S7 zJHvXG91OdBe;?Gp*h@XMgX40@;Yt7DxEyulqw?kZJd&MB*UvZWq?3G4f<4Ta<8smA zNxmGHD~??9WxpY&5Z`ooCZGPed_3}FJ$HtA{rAfl--Q2yPY(O*IOx&!8yn^=qQ7&f z*9!Edhk5{0fbpLBu%C4up4?aXmfQQ_82GH8 z&_B>GP<{bp*O-3qUF1@~I-e}k>*tyJcL-=#VMKnT%FFMq@;gVgtBBt%bN6G6z5VCx zykDceoJU!&;iqhQ`JEoioBO@i7Ud3a+9eU)ph{SAjF{ULtL@Od8cyWqKgl;>g5Teto^Eb+9>M?ViNt935( zNrCU?BmJm6;=2xFZv^XI^63wTiR>Q@=%4R97`|t$-PsSh^*s0aNf10)T=0_iPdiwy zD)NnyZ^-WW&vAiHGLA?d=oa}q!5q}S2zUO&uq+jUsJm0?t{^;3-^Pl>> zU>H2tF7x-C^$7RR_&rwfq11P4#JnW_V!vQ}E+Zeep2RNBYdOS|UmIbUdm z+Vbmjuw9Su%tXL<{b2IjzNP9@%I&rX)^8r^b^p=x3i+iG`AI)*)b05uuY9^5`J`39 zV?O@ptRGal#`vB5`OXukkY4+-slM~caV_hSUvYuoWp8-oS5@yPFu%4(e)_y4{mK5$ z^s(oye-`?C21)QmpS0h+$L|^Bz|(%`?~G`_bH1Tn{GE~cez&!Wd^*am%Ij&LmyEvDupI3&#*M8{ocO|YK_*3ec>q+L9Lwfi5o$&N}k>_%Y;L{HcoP*VVsEx48 z*yuSg@tiu_2j?H!$={c7+ikD^;yxs}jrAM(F@#;e$oO1Yvh{UT5$W_i(DgW1R34F! z%yar263eCAy>Id8cCWu@!g2+{cgrRD>FiO1(|+gg{CU~M@vZ&8XqRt0 zTMpWl#JN8HE)DgD!E^2EtwV0!dOOb{oo?s)JRI{WjL1jYT?O?r-+0?b`h||SzA;sP zkMTAPo?Cty7XpjzJV3b@ihoTxd^zaRzegR}+3I1xolj34dh*WwjM&pyYV~lupHEL< zdt3hCRfF-{q?z-*-3sjn#*j|RW!imzzmfJ6lMYYpG=y{+u3fx*qv)AJE-D8?~>+-xqQ1mHw~ilZ4;;Hw_f~#Sd|=H?FgOrymO7 zxq7Ajch$KbFF&-AUaxPODn0Y_?O^S5^OJs^f0u1XUil=EPWNm5J45W(=@I#eAGnTM z==T=&xnnQ;I>=AAhceDP>Gt5?ajqZ4KHiT6FCDI@QTvI;hjX42^L|+Dl>X1>jBfw$ zjSKf#{ce92ecb0KR$ylxi1K^xbGICxlqZJ%P=K86z`tZ}`K29nj@tTr=_#bs?LhB` zvK?ebT;==Wpt5d)Sr3?|95Nuf}$=epu+dngpMAb+Hei*YE!i zY2N}b>s0dZw zCaEU6Y`SfwOca|+lS=>h`>yYI&ogVkbN24{e?Omdp1q#+tmn3#b$QoX@0tqfe1GNn zdmr|D!Kn9z36`Jh_kL4GFWX;hywdwj0Oq|YdSA6;^XjrZge>rv0y)=AT=IlBkrZ{|8_j&y_j#WR0TZX}YfzYd`I zoTPqZq=(+9AJvQK+N2vdbYVa3`ER=YOFkI#fnT%U@6RDC@a2sDR`PXz8FWGU>2u44 zL_bcTuj)ba%gi7AJ(-z)8YA7HKWEyXCEd7@8^)Vwzx*{RzEGSG`t|gR%bvGqS9f;J z=-1f})KAOKJn0pW5M{q7mmj4AAp9+V31&X)#zCFGtdnp0T8HoGyiZU*YQIVMbyz*% zpXu+!$xr@?t>NtS=_lB~&$ay~*}uszu+R2al2@g?8TUYY^D~v#K7z`(S>E0Qjd=FY zeXIPY_#=2!KE9^2*WT-kdeHnrQ0IWOKM5X?qjMQ~@&O*@>_tPbL*`ObDuNA=hqEI(b3lLjBrv-i zR8Ofvy6O9pm7gWQyhpc#tHv4iIBMwN5533N3_eP4oi7?zj}xXm>S-g&xA*^|p7tc( zuczc%eSg?`${2hwZp8Lxc>w6CI1wB*^j43G!9x%6kshkox}k#}YM3<c^9<;V`j)?^=Q(RTKl$qloh{vZ ziN=4?mq>5@0KZLfoo+7c9?-+z_tQD8*qwv=YW+!i>s(!zdcdx*-gqyYzn_s<$JuA~ zjgqhT)YU+8#nJ>MlPb|al0VYiO zC_B9GeB$DtTzAk8^~Zu)=G*Vb5D$uP-;TlnznQ;lU1q*-hkl2vZpyxNkP|9H)IRMOi$kU-?n~Nv`kwlOY5h{8?o`(xaZDFOtry z=jBGSuAiK3y{XCab6sz0dwP|54#Zz?ni`^4oa;4%{+j8Be9HO3Uk^;PyuWW=BE9d2 zalS{-CU1O*ya|@~<#nRvE#IEwJ)G$coPGX#zkiRX+JBDp);_E+q_%dyccpkz{Ht7T zh#Y^PL-dUZId)tUf1S6p=a(@b)B9s=Lua4#^3NaWI}NQPfDYv~56zkKXou>T1k=nP zF?6x-k?hg;vJH<;?Nj})^zIlsv`^jls&x$U?UByb8@^xdZtCi-nsV*5 zwfiSdJm%Jmj-nryD{SQaH(T6}lFs%os4vNv-aYPLR!I*z(7Wudhp1m^lFsUle!9s1 zb2h!=Z;fuhWtR8bQ;PIf9_&y(N-y0LFs%QVy^7B=`O04PKdLA3tw+d*y;Yt^8QiCw zsaKEXwO=WD4c$lM?LQ_qcK)&UqCGcvS@wCu5tj4&jp~r!2P{X(LA~dAPINBwJousP zotJ@qHqO+4#5Qqu`TL?pue|)8B)#=RAa8l~^P1-mlQ+upzCYSS{85dN2Y*c8&oIYz z%jx&4InW38OwS+v{YcHnX4{X+-M*`uh6@ikEzPX1hUr>if;v?!BtB{9Nz78YjK<()jM*do?*k zukIY@JK4>gUH*J0&i7@%zbug6)*Jkg_U^HS-oX3!TLO=I*7&CO+allG4TJByiYwJa zgLD&w;D>sf@b-H|AKN^--X^^J&7_y)Nv|Ty`~AweS6=c)BjiCp-3L6EelHc9d5?tr z1wG+co$H-#|1`OUv)|5l;D5az%HAIJ&X8XI&^RbMtv3`6U7*kOxrd6uLypdgs=Veg z_PrV9^&Mc#ln-KT#{8?n{H~!3HBke^h4v9~$<>9=V;(*_ScMeplrzpt`(j+pXM zdg|T`@BWMBwC~+8S+1_ zz20l*Vi)MU|HHZJAWoL6a@?}>FW^Ta@YZjNhj_->H{0)QYo4AWz3(^i(|2Hbk52uJ zKTjF;==^w{qF-x<4t~me_DOz=bhaJ>e=M)@+4>3o@Z}}9asKeGNkw9EvNPD z+17QcEI-$EojU2^fB2y`?XkQ+f2$4o&Li;-=Lc&S{I2uYbD5tY&J_Rhm%cx; z>jB`a^Y%05{}Fn?ZvB47Y<5qvyl=O@)AQ%8@oi_?jrttheU|f&Ea%r}lIxFZf2z;X z2sweTUww$ZsNg8io5r|bF+y0q*v)@OFLAKUbJU&7i63)tf-rxDOLwnyu)^sM{joNI^o!tT{?D)gBij)VYcD$4Z`GCTsluUE_kcMCvI~vN7y8s_^QLlZ+9?x zhl5SR{MTH1oUn11OIPl7aEh>bze}ga9V`&m9(U>34;>sOoFr^^9Db6p!1Kb%Cmg;? zn0nHs$A9Wz;b#t(f9~KUVfhy>-6f3wnskJT-!M(sC9M3`;m3K;Xo2@*)_K2Vg7+{s z2&bNN^m*RjFitr6cZW~B>R^iBQ&$PcUvu~Zzwhl57WrLkn=r%gI_rdq*Il^=VeY>! zJwcd{xpqEDSeWP1UBZ$1F5Mx_EpX{3VQQgEj}sR7y~#LXVL8$-?_erUdcyPyEmH+oajplH3DbO^tr4~fGn^+^3C9UboR^Iewg|hNe-%0Zm?A83+-(zP zIUbD=wg@vE4{C%M27+-eHgS%N+qS_6)ScK#||jh-?qno zCn>+peA)ArMLQj`@J;tj+mi%g@CfR@#50yIIcv${lMg;)>6yo!apuw!_Br*$)AlT% z5z>Z!BH#GCoP8^-z0xnfan}28bG(A{S@YdKi0lGBSbvEX*B->HK9C>G8|IbC4{6lr z=t_>h=HY9L2Kk7-vwSqZ>3we|`pRmI2V+iCm*-x(#5Bra6IVrfL~B1d@{Q@`)+&s`G+6gVZX4t zgZzah;zjq}t7{`F54#mV71ANk#)FUVG9K!CxOxM9DCfYzdR+gr^|g_QC&*vaCI9i= z9Np#DFCCLknc#P>MjH-ad#{6?a~%BX^;`T+bdDR|vlc9$A$@#TXLp+Lzx)6BZ0&Vg z`UL4KCpx}G(!c-TKc2pOO7yV5x3#0Ik`8&mt3CLBnOw!uTfachsT&+#b_pK*mFAOC zc6CTU%|GYt+x$=8+AYeiv`3#I{g3lkck~Wv?NYx`BAx7NuITiXe}q>%pVlYHfL)Ev z+8&1l0K7nbQ6@{I{m*JN7*$(`dq=$$9Hpnc;ez@#ZieSoxlI+Dc|4FXN>f+V}kUTZgRzAc5H&(pda=0kMH61f8Y-rt+O16%mexf z_8ZbCOZw%WxbRC_BUKU5kCR^QafI|AJteuJ`dmw&@#t%$Kfd>&9o1J``o{jwe+iar zi~d`0j%!XMdc;M7?XO2VemuKl>nukQH!ai{TAeik474rcS*{<)WsKgU_0zDIp5 z{~*3z)%-=Uu6~`cqcr=?4q=yYjP1Um_D@)2J8TlR2`34AgbBt?nlPvIyIp+b2#bWH zgjK>i;W(lElaT%fAK3d(?f(dBoDatJrHl7J?f64a?@vX8b~&&3s9TR|?dkM+c+c}c zeP(-O%@gNO5wEs-)A`3x*d9;d}1$GPV>+g3tJWr{qq55B7a%>oG?V64EYrZ zcYpb(3vb$G(N*H7*cDXlzxT8=7N4=?v{ON+2l`cGj63qH)IQ!@{_*wi22C>1utU7c z077r^6;zu%WbtulEIH22<}LsD-p&ut*M7a-9f$pLEARpT4Dm?o0e`LI2_~4i`;t?S zKVfNM=?TX#Id1V8{klT7l{Z4ZyF5H^pVgoE=l78hdG#UkRs})u2r540w=g~&$$*>* z@>~BihoAMp{cry>Vk~&tIV&n{(g2~_l4`X-{V^3L%+rl{Zx;F>YLwl!YQXL=1W?r zAInb?K707e3l@Lz_Gv%I_ldS&dg8Pop)XR)<1nW{QU&@sWU{5^cR#JF8;yY)l=oIu78g2>-@3* z4R0Cw%UK8QjeNv|+Nq%0)9#18`-J0`9Df4n^uX^K@+lD3Ye&5Ly?b7r0uA`dUP1AF z?`cai7?7ff(;__T&r{u7y7B8l1AdA#LHYfF(G!-29WG-U z^x!u|K8g1@e=NA8dfL}lfAq7+ho5r9BdrH=WB9Q3G!q6JG;~`9C_3y=Pf?x zi06?H`6=cjtq1nWZ-R>3-4~y{_|)T;oO+Uo18DtNB)?yM<%Qetd3J*y$RMX0A;;?9 z-P?_OhoASeHMctTwO^tf^pO36^26?nPhWBzh=K=vTC$TcyJXYv|LKC&ru`g$Z*;s* zmt((q?9WDCyXpDu&jR1D{v*mkFU6Oj{DgM6tbVObeq(=r>X?16d+ckH(}= z@uR?Tu0@!p{%yiE`^hTd6ru20#=Va(F^-hqVp?=L`IqGzOsA=TiLgzma)Qp@;5-lQ zm^607uj+3F)t?_53`bh)3G18dJDmeuyd}8>4qqT{OnOKZk50Lw_Y86>6@QE z6#2pT>9G>aR|L5}f_yzzj^evD`Iq#AkG=K;Xpmpr$cEj3X+eaqYzwPpVL;0t=o11rMNGCk_TK#oSX^;P|8Nc_VkNk#m zhyH%jF(2p;83CW^`e;zj5qqwd{pzbfy<2iR#49e^kMDL-I==fk%2$0U|2=0Pvds$* zJ{*3Y9O(Q{)svv!)sG1|fJus*oL{~)y5hwzope(;4+-moc=e09?N9v30snoq zhVrP71oO*;@pS*a5HxrKeP(=bRwF&~t(^6N2%bZK^Oe7By5zij@i*SHCq4dMj^7{r z)j1Ca{0AOePttqme=gW!`!oOjItZ8PpK_m-t*64l&Oi6gd&|F8TH&b=fC_TT#H)XN z$C5LDa@t+{K92lgeLUvxt7k}GBh-8SIMd>*`W4>~Rv$h4i52d6K>3oZ_l4_zbih_e zRQ`4+<<65Fqyu|r_&;+-a03+_U*Tvy8PW&Z6>`HPfANJ(y&8uEZC*|-hdtp79{z7hwOG)Uhj zlsy?kXYG-`cYW@GTOYplkdHtgTmO1re7?JMl^-4X%*D)KSle>Yue)!&!FtHU1HX5@ ze4V2}KJ+Y8pBmvf;lvO z+0X^@7fl)auwGVUe#_7S-zHth!}nO|@y~wgo|nVk8RJfe`b-hdb=*lD(f5;;vmfoKZ}^F`Hh$=m7m&ob zQzX6ktA1x2cck~Djj5ZC_~rd2@Pj<{+v@-kJdJnn^72u~-TOoQ9mGj2@$SKMSPjZ= z6KcHZdUj~M5Z|#4*Iw(fXKOzOUn_TAAcE(R$9Dbws{eW7KKzaLAvs6~u|8wGD80}6 zZRU6}YVyN&&UB7Yej77%&`WwtuS@^*pa1-L&oz#O9#(J73liU76bt3_jLx8vzkK_pflr85b9BJQ{z) zPqIg8$wfNKZ-t|r-%5m_i|X%3O+M^NFr6V(9MlY*^_%ql?>$HT=Enzo<2fg%?>F@~ z-#%ooZya>aFT&vt_DBxsqx4U`-|0VF|DGWo_(1fOUvh@bTEO~s>!@2Q_Sy5C;WzmKt>Y!YTkS0+pwdRrfx!V$r<=Jy|| z-t_S1VY{>OrTqPBsT(FY|Mp9u4g3)+Zq|PffFDQ6e~eJ?ZOtKa!wF%)>*yaO?_TAR z1HS~mR<82j)IR(-o1Jlp<~fUM^9T2nkNw%auLbcCK8O?P0Yp@saisYee7rNsxE%t7mq;F`dRt=E|=Z+x;MNroNl3h?fp!!zd-(@ zgsR`MA#%5-+|@5UZr^JkTmG%ST;>0B@ip0p@AmK4|9)G@lw9#K($EH$8lv^4kU<^slkvaxR`T%%2>{ z?~k9`K(XN2@2OXx{z$G9&L?acE|MPk zHlE%AMDW~D+j8?AFD~wYzim7zf5`@KSi0vw?)V(?5l{BsNz_Z7{9A;Ir^z95-w8&+ zlRtR*KOB1HMZd(~R<80hPrX>V>WI^>Mn39Qa*&R+^SEWl(}>B3-btpjgo>xCp@Uq} z4U^k3^fsO*2l26n(#QAp#5glWKP3$w@l;vJ{!xB4`LJK}B*7lzEpO;xXPN!1#zXag zBZe-pbK#gtL$5mft#J?EV*lATc<8HhE_yGX9LVp-f4GntIP=1@&pd0FpRfBQ{A%l8 z`Cr&={p&aV;40x_Tv%TxF#ZV@XT!#&FrWk8Q`hWy;upIcUh2zHes$YbN=yH^@*j{N z);IYh9p&d1^ZogWKkjr4ALw6Ux=yHZr)TJF``if%1kdpgJ-W^7+a7Wy{zksW9pztn z%eLG6@Y2tQ%?ABM?nLLO65(9?i3;f@NAvw~p)x?O^4G`D+v}A}!fgdxU&=ppuT5`$ z=EWOMMS0lUCciGB>TB3IvnvV)&!;bcWZq96+jbxPZRIF`)AQQL?7R4L;g%EXOL9Pu z`U?JqkKpJ@{q}}=us_aJOg{9^FkK*2zfd=HkSjU}i;~+l^yn8fuj>usV=bnWBYi#5 z{^G=E4Bn124f-`dkl$}-yE!++_AKmi;j(3p7q^(!wAN{Yl?y5nVw-&%$) zuybM8q!HIi#%<3c@4}En`RpUz5H!p1J*074JhTcO?doS#V1E-TzWTtwveFIoJ7r{0*;<0`DKLp@l$5{%k~@EPrK^eEAQLq#OLk;KeQ{^i8S;OU%?9b zA|K;Ha}(!B<&T+s#EtejO2n%lY8pDL*9u@9JR5)HANzmnu&1`g-vRF#die7PUytOe z{q_Mpv`^IY^vD`I$Wg2aYTw1*N18Zh(C&)i19{rd(f*g>v0><7cboCD3JeXNqn6)w z!;AL1=oI{oc+q~v6wA$ZJV~6^w;%PS_bb&??PT{|j+4{hf6+dX^eq}bL3}K-`z7d) z%FM4DI`lh|mnFVAkl(jk`#4Wt^}F>>K5G5bWViM;x-2(WyW^vScI!Q0nBCg1&_0dq zE*L(rbChYjj{!TyKg0Z*DHjz_ZTZ8{Azm~dNWS8yW9ZPo_DmXjwHX(w5B2Q^zDRt= z!*>|}d4os4TQX_HU50dJ;^jZoj~?4EYF;#~KT~qkgf?a?;1n&!CU!q)(UhiPQV_4SjUJUHYU9PVy&|f5xD_`mRdy6DA+> z?eDHbzWP!1$MSc6u-qciNq&*}6+;L6^&N}kkC}Y5d)2#OgY}lBJq^M%%QZ}S=&SFh zq^HK^wxJ8`To^yI@0ZYSlScdOvHj$TSNnr~deHvT-uH0_i(6PD4ta=dDehG<_iy7Q7^JXuwdwedR@??e))Y} z|4}mewjC*sr{2$XCPN1~>X!s1r+bLg&!129=x@nw8-BL^D1IfkXXutCSMw$R{D?0% zcXr=@w%sJCx8#l*x@F1Le6e&`pKs`A&)#vv4{|ln(0oL4yM`{D$Ll*Op2KT0{lNK8 z{!4YNI1k2+MHQas&y<}$w?6*JYMSc>@i|}kVewL7Ipjyh%b3ZB9h%3~4t4TM%x@aH zDE~>0Y|y!lX}O;NdWK&ZFZ8$OHIkb?r(X|&z4J8xk-dsnL0^wiQ$DI5D<&U$Xn#QG zMx;m6(An`^=OoUY+GUHQwqG~gFG0Q7@Bg5;_)2f}vx3QUot-+jBR{5zS6cq`e}5}W zI^@F+?Z5Y^_jLbg=mNbKi4Ns3f2c9PW$1wKkWa_M=ZWun_>SuLyng+GPn`IqhaY1* z$$0oA@p%tlXFpQ%@M+@99)61b^O%PpC%$3ufnQ=Rlg7AICfx+_wm#rHJOOS-e_b#1 z?GN97z4y;-#{CXf;=_*4@Ciks*8AlQ3^E-XzueIqb2hGd5e2h1hwcUG3iRCMV zw{5cdkLHt)to15I>oDRr=<(NyO>^AT5!3(`7J>| zW=NMMo%J93G5a0_{YFVwkD!;1&`*2>wVo$EI_nSi3)Anv5qzWiDZMAybv5)8>5tNX zoR>o$>?jbAH0>h~bqv2=EWaQYW~>vW zFLd=*AS@Hs3EPC=gLq5ucc;{U_2{=L()sbG^^FSsZ0|{sZqQ5R1WTWAdVwaG$ILIE z?dn(gvKRU2pY;Bw^#H|f!|(~p&Xi-`6NCP1q4-Rha^SD`Dy<^h=Fm%AT$-iXqft}O$l2n;rHu+&aQ{QQSntOgA6Hk<#%>h3B_av=n$e!8!W#7l( zFTEF~KH2v}IG-!JwAL-eKWFIRha%Jd`$~`cRt!D-qkA$Ym|rvbuv_y?!7(XLhJTGl+S^GVmP+NA&4v$6DC=5Z=#?X>-$`Zej})2Uw@rC;VcE~YPb{x1+}o>gWV za?nrdccP~IDcV;jovkP6Jwg1k#zpYe?|G?w_G&jjANKyI-=`4$nAwL!9BRB!zoPN0 zbV)zX&`v5$+xI`rs~Uz5c4U}t5lXK0KjLw^|6spdVO%b}=_?yWy;o#O*OMNk|I3T7 zyM=G>3e?SM+>+a9>mpr;b8;xSAQy)yv*6@uPe7WPEQi1Ne4dA zPxArAdyjS$3?1a_Jx%hp&L&tRz1Ekt-YkEV%(#wq5Y1ag_H_MS!^neP8uv9Gs@}VX z4(%|0xwG5uKLbBXx(xH7H}D3rfyh_gOMyeSbi%+N<_i zB)4Sfp#Ml}u-^T8RJ+o?$#|V{Zums$ul*9WBfs6~o<-Hyl;LOFO`H2QipSIyeLK+( za!mW}rcHh$9({%QiieLAU-R%|tf!`j&lBJF@G;^i4Ib^XXVPewO}2x?mChdd0dc1% zoNsvbBmb+OY&q0tadg@B>9$)Av z|Icm@eE!=9Pu&WtAb)<3c(wEI_MUiO<;4xQLO%3Y{Upa+J!+gqzMepz8U0fBs(!n` zJj^dIK5w}52iFAU2cE!>izF8r`2I}wl_cL1VTG`15a4k4cC&t*4oQT(fhe^h^7Gx@eZ*Ek~iQ>@P{>57D7h92#$({}Sa z_|x{&8fSD)VZxMyUkfKJyI<1!hQ=B7ONndxc7%R7%%wFhsDABvBlti3@G;O)Q2VFa ze-_mIPU{ar+3*qGAGdU0r|2r4epUK+&DYY<=d@GaK+n8Bl-8zznRTW7!3B3|}8Z@K@`?~I(`>iPe=9?>KJ+14Yp zuay3r^VeM0)r+Jbwy&i5n(WYg-P(!x(!FYe!}e*$DG%i_?qrs8{?U6^mHCr|*01n; z^7GEVWvw4TAN75L+LwtR*pDa3*Y7?~%UQwgGmlcvG(ON5agbioydn;ns_UR$NxzeC~-Fx8QuaGz8!gj-S;^;oVxqMe$F?=wt>0S(dH@)?N zci#E0r*^HtPUP#}i_L%to+H0`;{%(_&xQ9AqW<*#a+iGd9f+fL|D*oocft4<`g&VA zXS3k0%YE*ScWiRuaY&-w6-Y1s`o3Y8`6$*%>!{VQ-ys^-WUv&DW35Bn)T-L)Uh%b2fHvK%};q$~-JbZ_7Su=R_7y9nE&Gwri-6&zx z(A)k(->-?Js)PN7z60w} zj{1u!qbK4|bkHlxuJjGg56F+|FR~^dai{NI^}VU=DjGV-6`ka&pAc-Z9_prCRDaPl z`C&Uh(dn!2MkRm3(AoZCHz*K1@89r|=6U(MOZXdn^j&G{M#pci{l(}>j^2KE8r5Hn zkgw$Fdry65DZR%GU07cu{rW(C$zOsKq@S(7=o-GTSKnXidr8Sp+|-vB$X_Hn=#Bm& z!~CM51HMWABOX3Se8t1}SU)unUnaik;bX+N4Icf4zUS<*Unnu&>x7er9&wN>IQtHT zLBaFy=l}Sff9!o&cyAW+HUHS#Wyjuo_}=xKcY7+luh5oP{$tOrmp$YyM@@np`I?`E zA5sUngU)>UwbPIIPx%M{=())6L3`FppTw3Li-`acmPvUR%H&Y&e z)$g$WMt+grA9?ls2VPy6d?Wb5E{(V00z-iN#3k!}b%UM9E=GP3C$W5Dus_P(?CdNN zsz0hQjdIqX;=AtpZ$A2!V}A3B@+EhFAcE%y&wlmRAKrEOx%fNmR}4S2kKkYU2=+{V zRDTx#azEbDF2+eeK`6ha4V~3ndVOZyGmrV?=U+Y_!mYm!aO%X8uRVA1mS?RujwJL} z94IZhNW%`bZ^0(zw+8f>IiKp7eAqL}^cbP+=@~j}kMu3w{GSg`Jbh-UueIkuC>T8N zDgCQ@(Yu!mk6lAf?iSWJVO0NV<%rK!ckgiZdOz4dyuZiFIoOGbW#|I=i$n+c=*JUZael}W3SVHk zyoayQKP3;JB);t7^NL3gKgRafFnILuY4&4z!VY1A^esbg>*H`J9y~|R+v*K}d+7QH z@wcrH7Ub|tX zU-rJ-=qX?Qzw)o#Wz+8+x9$0VL_X{tC%*|o)tCJ~(aH%g!U)Q)y2+iJ#((y#1$OgM8FOkNlE%IKL=uTl16O+y#hxp2ay5!Z3XZLB$9Uo6k^34@2e z{&(5wf&6~Fp9Dt+&rfz4`R_0P_Qcomx2=EW?{Ltn-@X2X?}XPhh4n>#6+*??uyJJx z7zfYz#hs%+zhw9S;BPBO`IR-!y`r?r#LCDI>)YrZ<>&aF&L6XlD@oFUFZ6GdZVf9I0t9^T@~3g-jCxnlC`63#V#;`j9JwQ+np^;mQ1KQDdy{-;I3KqvRkR zRgb*^yJpTy;`jFLhTh|(pCDBHqzxV9if)+PQA3Y;iSA*m4B}&Xrt2PljPl0~-i|97 z=66g!?ALfA*ibwey0D#i_cN-0i{IDxM_}i|j7ei$DKTz~9=^_gam3)EuYbQrWgx#F z?`Ol2!E@yacbvLia))o=Z`*$;|FzD${`>M#k3EL`u)fG|f>3cbY+TVdk-J}f*yB%p zZPyw1!YTifUtRUo^J}$!06AfO8@;3aT)N-+ZMJb`lyuTRrE-KCS89gNw#V~OFnGTF z;&;w$Y;oEI{zksW73FtUxbXJJu3PdxtyEx5j?+~cf;@h zbkyW>_}kW(^1rk7M>o6tLyv^}e5kJx@~aZ6zJ`q}9|7aw+5edbu6^wD2S0?rtsLdQ z@!_RkY`o>~;W{JgOL9Pu`U?Jqk6_|~ew;^*D=Cu?y*t!*ictMR&d@=w=pZagZq?AE zU(kL}Z4e(TF+J|#8;5>Fu83*Z{ufT5Fe{E-ShBW`YrK|0sW`nSE|fUn|#=>@kB62 zx}2edo&NiZ`nQsy3+!B2HEE11)) z58!X)Yg|$O>dD-CKX}(Z4tWl>+jzwi+pd1#Y1Nr^A;NZTu*|aK|0#@^97%yLZG- znfz*mbB&+zA$ojlf-@W|AbGI$G;Rle9dWe17`6ETB_!%~? ze3o*Ky>#z;zx%h94)od|w$i`OtfW=_;Y( zXTs1yuIPrzO+7pi57Y6J8N|nW zl-ZAs8@j;Gg_9>k_Q{q_U*Mt)dd4!Yp3 zUm-uNZ=-jVpA+A8{+MlCNs$hGp?`;brwBE!qrb%8R*v$o`ssszS^b1_!q-~Vm*jvR z^%eXJAHf#o0~y5WjB%x7@=;F}rt5_27p4pyUj(o&Vhy11p=NdnW zNBj0dj^g+xFbtD}#^oGBN{Q>HsNPcBP#m}&DZ}ipG_gZeda9W9alpN5{i-@0C+uAiVei9}hdbgv>M-krucr7 zC;z%B4?A@4srHFV1*d<@(7}$_V|}{&%5$X;sc+|cDR>LuDtaVY{Cc(GPrjmGbG6Ig zKbQLy$}D&3(I>9IFcqpX{U7x4?>T6Ye$yk{`_JV*g$dHvw|?iJ{QDH5?A7--Z@6>u zx0ZEJg6z)zuwNfi9PtqzbO{iG!|q8KG3CSWM7J6IUMJ4{F+y8!h#!4-t@s@>zD(bf zAbpSj-HV&qdlH0)4N>u(`;oJAwtEr^qyr!5r|Y z;(NlR5#MdnO%ZSX1YPjJzr~dY`wxAmu71ImL;s%?NN#d>k z)?ZEU9)OXxcz@?rj-M@u_|Q1EtbQmcGh<$+@lt-3AM;%|u1ij1z>a=9P`{$@cRPk| zS@QgT%$JvZ()z96&no^UFXz#zzpEYW%Bw%N_w_GJFaP^rU$3SouY9PJi35GKMb7Uz(2; z3?2McHfiWpqF?GBUcZ~sH25fgwM{ zqOW(99}^}YcIkJ&^}Vy?+4&6QiB9tJn)x+D7Zqpn|G1$;oK2cE z{4h#C#GmT>0r(j4NrR8lH)Han^qpiJ<_%qxzM8j<7&_=XX424WisRR~hp!OdHu#`? zY|^ALA1aWpN4)wE)RP{}hZ36)#+~ksQ2%Mm!5;rTS@iaP^}v7gn+pc{svKm4kLC#) zxAk3A_33{7SUwA=w9iNW)I3VV8y{=8OvlD~}BXZa!esNd7LpX2Xolnfu( zula$-YxPru>w$egt};ZP#wCr{lGicvtRGh!!bju2#@!b0w@Lo0Z$IK*_nHW5zScd& z(P=*A-@m0e^6x`|I)Q!*{QFHxMlSrNd4a|`#of4}3;R2!?Ysc^tmuB-wMBJ@vAtGx*rez9r=y(xBvT3{ycGvbc%-z?*W%x>W`2Q`HFkBAIWbU zK9JvK+TPO^#M_K{V&b>`xCms@2}Qi{(^+p-}?Si`&K_8fAtI>=#`vwe(>k@{=7OzI@Cv$zb44HXy~H+rT)8Y z=-{uqNkcDDOd9PaLBGbIarP;$puZl_X*ZVX?*$Qi;vv#m0x`KVaN^bILPVMVtLgg^7TMJ*(W$j zdeA_QzV8kXY6rM^>wPS~@!Jz$RldI8UI~ccdGYkkuipR2+}rSX*#8{t^vM6tLG246 zUr&@CBculn^pKnlSm<*v{d={e-@if~Nvz8@J^tF)i28mT_1?L6@cV1ENA(k$XT*N* z^oE=$JvDwIALCQeyDuhd%G>@>?Mr$V4ITKD?sNJDGQ-Djr|Q=<4vSCSeR?0!dz0jqJUYFn z<=*GYk00vb1R?B;(yK)J^pSnJ@VkF6Psfv|_p~0%ORt`xi;`D3%E{3@Pk#6B;mQ56 zuTR(>s9&2<@;)PKUmSBRhT@CoAM&-L{M|2pF# z<>52LXFYtJ_=1OTv3-qr_%iVo51$~uX7KplJ3+sv+5e3Zb_kn>9{!#reMT_ioND0j zd7>K@U#V_%ef!^AXGjM=kgxArV()k5bsnf_=+NKm9OLpKl(AatAJ6Y)QE6@Mh$IF{Ou6)h^wrBoF_qk@p@9%NLlC7$$J0Y{j$y%-GXLD6n~9Z!{(XU2L|Vv$rI=&Ld`Qr z$QN>=^wfP{$j3PD&ok?$JmO0Cmg#;o>Dlt=bkCT7ADNv;LLbGkpzb~M?;rE$S(z7| zz0ezawNG?u|NgO}N9W%!rha3#`DXDr$KStS%s`Q}w&^=-PePSg;hjyWJ=zD{4@XSBv%JZ}kcM9i>l)_BWUG<}l!J4fucklX=$l_2)Z3r0R>&8! zp|^i;mh^5Ix+p*Co~zmBt5b##fsZ_*FAiN^)&9`6U28se4TOK_3&lI`zw8Wpl6);q=%nmf0FU=W#aP&AKpL5`W<7x z+at`9zGUdb`n|>Jq5HVz+7IadD!+dH`Dw?Kr~9Q!l&kq^&(NVAXnuMyDmZv9SY_3d zR*nBLTzJJ-NOXoLEJ3R{bPAk4)K&?dc?ywW`14oYS5-@PRwubbolh8-CM0 zPuagaKdHX#d>8d4I^syq- ziC6pej{4C2H_808$%j3fCkQs_$DE;q-v0b|y8RitaQ14g3`CDj9l= z3))W__In;>Ly!Jfzf+=h>B}~0R{rqwOKyg<;76_J{;$91F=^z$Z;eBoUE05j@>^7# zXkEB;Sl=&E{w@5opC7h|LtR?y(2`g7=(KLDb!7eC#$12rW7z&`&pX%I_2g32%9hCb*AV$EF!f2Tz2!CGI}dtt?tgCDdWtaWjn zKd`@#1UjwbYCT(VWaka2C+*J*`s>D8Kh}P|)_K*x2=A|d`}_3qfA{?e{j{E|^>6iG zB|`^)SD5zKc_-2*Am7>gYt3id#tu85ReyTi@)zbFJomL7)t{<=PQ32? zG1vK1hV+h4|6J_<+Mnv&o%#>(i|SA7o;>y6et+6FbcnOA>^h@g-@uoNPyDx!59ChI zM~lo)59IgfqdG@(;ma%R@bjO({5|=z%znPaa&z@(Wk61U9@Y?_rF}iozBT_6%#p5b z_@F&%9;SXm`|Vvrhxtn)cHR#z`w*;f@3mdVQP#uPiO(B6`bmvj!^ZiNp||7w>P}?r zps_6;D!*&x@P52-oagxZzmD^5PmcDv*QA^ke|19h#L3g{LlSyuUGR;}f73ViTIFM# zZy$a?4LvkIW#&2m$d4os0qP_8r@up3AUzUR&YodzEOzjkjgvM$tP?JKhTk`N{51|n z{k|CLRpXMz3(?PYo}hhHzkm0~>%{ziT!j7m5iSlj{zz`l&;{|dNaG&NMSCkTziQ~h z_DQ>I1|P=L`<$Ev^UH+egiS*ay)-Ur+)+K*eiikk_9CeHipD?a8`b}&7I=O*(&?xD zTlK$rLudQn^}#rJ-n;tR_g?qgyMBwm5ntLD8e_S+_7_bf2li`UPy4O1-@czN%YNSfF`OeGnfTVY=nvd-TJE z!P|a(g85Se`Tc%;W9oDG*dCwWsd4cSkwm>{A2Pkj**({K$&(&@qU^PCX6+p_<)FXb z!$*m4ntbq8{0hdI-!^oJ3-$kMr<$L24PDs(FW0YMw966tE$iWXY+E6t}$A9iW@HPAOUwRL%Vyh1tcYsQapbed;(eg539 z)P8Q%JUj6J^!a7Yo1_=yL!S06N4@>e{PKN2qMkJWo`&52)bA<@>U@j#HPt?Z_kX|2 zpNEebxzJDhciNwoAG?MQ^&F2oef{4(8X;YV`LG-GDdO`UzDGZoJba7z@*sZR81Z8s zzRdV&7(D8`Wzu2$cO~Lz0A#{b&gN{^sf8-;P+}fmOgdBAbny5=buZj z+WdIE^NQZ~?~91sZhWT~wtDouzaj}ewLUXSKGH)x0HfNo&J&KY9O&@AQHu}07v#j3 z(E0)W_@qZa*Y}9Tiv2i7y=R!V>prNLqM?Jmlhk9Bc&iU=z+>x0=NDBkzdqo$=a*G4 zqHmD@wP#(upqGti7WfY7a?FRl zVf~vl{8=I0DDl=_=XDpyG4Gt<$XaecJ?gy~_W9=uMF*bf?^NGuz9(fjcIVtDjDCT> z^KJb`)oW@MXTRP{!5{Md`x`Q(lYF&vea|9$iiQq;EQ`N+p98)}J?n-Z{v9`I__sm2 z4)Ia`wehe0ENeG(#sm9RUNF9Dzulw1@#Ax12j|xe=~NE<0zbuc4qf##X6!`1&h;xl zb$UO}kl$I?wFl*onfyT3jP=I~^{5lJjQ)s=HrMYJ?~0R2Ll^jYVPdtu-SB(Xq~Xs3 z>GQ-}yJ0&X_$$SG8h%V)BbntJ=#(8=sUzWJ-mMB zzHRWRuSt^*`yrO^5pVqt+wfo<>goHe3!EQxZ^><&Z2qIDdrsO%Ie+MVAhWvj$6S9m zxJ3H7{%-IX>1X@hVA-L2OPq!7f7H9~9}yh(yTMbG=lm0#AKAj$tKSW7F+aJ6v)lSL zY$wDo>vx0EP8zEX##Ld;r4|2{FWO0$dI&E%=o!`jS9f#o2NTo>bnt`b7J|uhS?_EI zpo2WWzfY|>825gEFa7g|4sk!ibj9?8VSi7(#tc2;xM9-pXM=Pt;$=Vd)B`&8YwGWZ z%`;VAuxI3Mf*?B0& z4V`zaF@JJ^e=zPG%zBodyst<;1PpvKV?0d0aj@Q}$VdIL^t9_NsNa&xnRRFAseS1j z^Q)qxe8r_;k9O1zUD)pq8P{5d4&z#PFda+0$=b6ZmLvZZ@rn!UmvDV@H`hK@zat-a z{`|zw2fcM+%2K<2b@W+BFaH$D|Kl5^cUsncO}&)cKdX}drERwRfPY_;jrRieQaP&$ z=oD8qPk&2?de{4#V3+a>7dkr=YdOEwnQjw;586#-eP^%w$#Is?vYhoR>QDO@iuWAH zpT;MgJn%&vHCWz$KZ$;#Lpv!cZOx}s$(j8?IR5hc zD98!plkG(NL0XR~vpncvUzO=hv2QoljkNAQb)dty4q`s}HVq%hPi^hyrIN4pXRQZI ze$SMH{P>%lJqfNip*-Yk-Lgr&vRwBr6J}Tr^pIcA49eHKm)4mizii5d_A~uI|NiqJ zpXuML>Ydd0Blx$N?hVq%;>0J`?)L}ipL8Cp!SlRnlOOP#mXqbVPS_7QF{Vp{^szk8 ztCkHOaV|C6}{oZWnnsqK#^KbYwkhj1;&sg{5>3pot<7)k+ZRqU!)P7(b zJbSFWX#NYWPI&z+`VF0DO}xeVLGxNi?fyr71pmTEFhhDEVZY7;>in$i_s=D$ykM8- zF~J9R`{x(yo*ezYs?Lq-{9?<{1-xhIt8=4}gE&_Ej;}jd|C8jC_V8uma|VyNP&EZ}P@-egZwQJemh|LwdaXb1Cj zeiibg{FGX+?~kbZ$e4V{)%jGNV^w_=44w72J&%g^HcGnMAbqSy`m6m255MU9mSMkB z*&L*g>31sI25;j~zf(DB@~xa!VNxBU2@|SgLxPP&Mdrv9-AJ>gW$bZ&#BfhWJNdNffOWOvAbp{^j zD(%!kQFX{a${Z{Ai=0{w;7np_th|4Li z_v*c=N4?9W^Yv~LzwGs;{=Q%3L>Kp(A1!FS=`oEBaw7bveLvC1H+Fj8^O=wTMty_m zt^c%dq;jGGjEes{<9LMpK?gsSy!M%8{utq)ANuPhTJP0(U%JHk8GM8OZ$a~IgYAB< z`$CCL`t1bmD#LWf+ZXCmzoMZ>yBalV_-mYWRpPBZ&=n8rA^-o`u3F?j*LF2U`nk5N z)TYia!`hYFi|qLSZ7&tdbN&g|8F-(Q+Dn1?4MOWz_!Jz-(4>H7EP-Y#C= z`TIZWs=}~dx_@=}Y}(nce(!I+=Wd^$f_D7}_2|=UUHz7Cp7zD4b@lGw9RDi$i~fr7 z|NJ)U{_r~WDUyDiaL=N_6Sp(_xlO-V?ExlJo&P#&phe!q_gpf{;A}}oxiT{ueU1xnnrHWKP{B~!|vr# zKPf-<2Fu41TR1!HIve`E4(YPYhd(i|Oz~WW^eveDaDK~kz}jz*(i?u3KLqvt2IRml z)mPKwuk*HAUz1%OLkIo4OxydsfUgptcw4{zU{`ZRS8uW_ZStY7#!kTz^2r%G*xy;+ z@sVDN`;wup6_%YA4-PeR4{rlQRO*!yaTq{1rfAaGF_znIImGkxy{QKBC zq6_qos;4URyM``|Q{G=E`D#b;t@?JNo-!s4y>uU2(ZlOLwh@EJe4t{|sMj9rvqrq? z0shy6ey~w>aisA^W0Z$-i2EG-A?}u5SCQsQn(rrLPzKpa*``{*BI@fYlpKj_eY{P&~m)o$EKyklm4M~(ab`6hq-wC9`PPmP;`CCaG~LN7ahPQTZ2 zzF0SO=$G4r>DZJ>!%rEdx1DJZWZ?<>+5P|j`q?b`&(_aQ?;n$XuJ2tn($DtZ)u0`7 z?PrIrQ}ig$`6rmyZtVP{exc3$)H`ST6@D)gKWjhxW48`B&i!evQw%$wT=wXjloNG6 z8S(9(|D7cL_zE-i#(t5`ap>Ip)o(fG8!O+t-&OEK7*E`P&28t(t3Hvh2XU_UCRidp zXu|oIcTTo)YJc8i=SP~~$}bJW2lJ3N(?oerw-Z#m>6qggbT_+v!{+VVAy7 zE3@2O_c?1u4)oE!?TmXSO?wLBc+oUnARp~(l6>Mj_3cCZ(*A9W`N@I&zFoSn^4Q1U zzs`q_yZKGBOW%nVSZ=O%jT$+yOXo%6{C-J(E{yj33D_k%$cJ6y{a5e7HOhmJ!g)M@$3*k9 z5$3lDtzY5y9`VbXpCKMpPEhCNB)8!Geu}=2DD3L|r*fc2+-ThO&yU*gdC-39EN}NQ zgLsOyiFf>h?^KzdjF1N!Jg`Ied2ZU{IOeY}cTB#OGweR(_`3)6is?S&l)*!ezs{UB`9WRHm}hpWN5Rm+ zKV_~n>)ed$XVlPPysVit{1PX>mWOZgyl%(fp|8I$(>3|fL*GTWc)zjgd$x0$x_@@I zbDH@*`+kKyo$t!>{#M1|s87dpr&&VjHCr4GyC1ktK8nLhBM#Hz3;OpD`{zQ(Jvq96Soa;v?g>L@?XK|r zv+V1UF12^R{t$m-#AgjYs$CRJepI^{C7%&P7u7BlFI7W_cF{EHP%qZUgojTN-!*vX z>#s}3@_jp_^o@~E($GO)?dz!>Yh1`0I_O(6=|JE4IkwlThcEGbea+y*e&3|g?-%(U zK%02Q3F=P|#+U3vgX7EexqF^pv*qyKn&Z0aaol+M$HqJK3ZK3IdhkSkW*_IL@3G*1 zx353{g$)jTP5EW6hpo^2_*?GT>zw`W+7tQkSApe638(c*_Wd8&yGV2>7uGN7#|eRl zU)qD|dG>4){1jvUB;k~y2M;_L|8*~d))&+-71lWSm)1w3*ZC;Xr}uUGzjr};MXhCr z%tQXcy=dOLLXq@werIQ81o63`P#wIVa<=tA={ruokPW|0C~fvjfiG%(algLbf$vbC zq`||_8Iy)ztK^#}-s*4dPChsoe`+V%U$*6J{2jBR_V3#Ve1`ax!6Oc`CXG0#(2fG}(d{dk?|gkQ4&+z)-;V>;^P}`{ z_0FxYxctns!{s#iU-kSa7F_GCU;k|Bu9d@Uk>QVV>N7zoc~kZN_zr)FPX6eTKK0(d zKVWypq{H|pU7q-1c29Wo`}nR-{xG}M|NbzvG^nG`-gEoL?cdxD{ld7TJl(hVssF5f z&l`?-{Qbod0xxs`hh=#5+Dgd#2nqfe4;srdECOrlbD+JNzB^eV+Iz-7$Ki-2^>+_y{VF zT9nfnkQexe_r8j5(&R($I@7v;RsKm72I66n=pa07FU&6*I^fIXH{#(F#8(U+aaJ?w zuzk_qCh<{m7Sz|G?k+B_6z7#s?7Nw4gk3s!q4PCe@tdPRbq|8>L51BIr+j~A4($60 za&@jp`&N=$GIW8SL+erR7yf;izTAf42f6y5RQF*@?u4ORmRz03FM0PG`*KqU4ce>w zF4evyw_xaOeQACC^}l@OOx4%2^b*Z%^)PPa!5`D-<9H6Q#{90Ko0Htb`~7ER{U1E& z58b1z_9VF_LkGD!pCTwbb^dQUeU6i_wBm5oYu63KANFhiQuhvLNZ&PdXs_`@oc{j3 z$`#UOm=C!jJ@I)DKT5xrJbaJwSN8A~;>SFEocM-^PoL%d(DLw8T(_L?@Z-c!89e%% z_@TDGg72nDmm=Q!88+j=e7VB)cde5NMy;2DUi)E+_agbf_+wVDggcko)-}Ranf&f%tzyRm9ci9U)6h>Ursy$L8pGxx7X4Iyl0$OOCIL@ z>aWx1h(~$6pQX0-#%t<5LONgXI`LYkA9nt8{Qo%L`Zg=$rEON(>C;c|`9A20`GDqI zzo$Y+KYsSpl?OK43HfMW>BF79c|wgttuOTZiy+<>i4Nt^env@I#nPKWP8G`{urWAJrdq$$zf>QSyDx zKXdJm@}wWuAE}@5?U*()_yhH&^RR-$`k4mhp*-3}Vb#HYrp){fq4g{L9zW9Ax9omq zX1}iei`o3B_kj}SoYK7Mi&6c$f9`XP^qai2wj&lAJ9y+3*$UiXHKgBs8Lq6J>=B@gURO9Lx`GF4Y zs>!tdJ_GG%!qA}}OH5A@4jV5fZXeW3_m=6sZqSbT)9Zvcyd4_FVz*rWj`J2=^wK}@ zH^z(N`QlbUx_$okxnlzWt@?^_=t_ zgL+F}$b_60<>+^Q^*%RAJm{>P4S)!qt)9E*U!P6x_96TYKIx;KJv#TJ^R@Q-1j}b5 z6bzo7SA5TTTdnZ#@c#6me&&e}@{pE(N|%jZfzM~W7mZPmI$@I#<-_^7cRyXrUql01$r$K9rz;N6300EvxLIuSuXG4W5ky{e2w;%4IXhjX3~h;H0c_|N00Xl zmLJ{3eaEJDA~@H1=p^~i)?cZ<6D8+|$wk`~qxvgbr`hDLH_*W0& zKz*IybU)>N4^gK)ltsTkk{#^#N15Ly40umJ@Ox~rvv0P3U*A8=--1zo5BnkREBNK6 zg$IAYPU$09r9Pm8J>%YfMv?hVLX`tO)skurGn(^->7 zoTW%tAU-o3yx5AxN0ABr=}7wtmr=G$Qp5sPiN(|qwBmnD6b{6)X%3r`hi#@WpG&~cV~=}%ikzE^5}QSYH$(l2@K znXNU)l0s4MmB|k{e{6T*Q?L8)m7!mF4#KxXJONQ3k|n5lUH4P2UFm#pnetE$^)$K8 z;Jhx+{5qknC&-b{1huc??<353KmA}o?$JK9j^)3f{y)~f1l*CLYCCs^!LVs?jfxNi zG$3kF#JC4g2`YFM&?tx*hJlN+gn@w|qCo^Beo9o-$RZIHB8vuPi3kz|A&7hg6$$c* zaU}?9T+kpcf4`~sy*a7dxdETQADDCN)Ty&qb#+yBCuQi+ALdmy>sT0fioyqWz)xN3 zTOoeh^J(0hpXvLX>c7@rJKml`$L{^B+YUJMz8^mX|Bc28%F{mTzqbGGe`*hX_!!i~ z&iLWZZjHB+=Y2namFUn8cBj>j5O~;KFlE@?ru;JT)5Zb4zo+~coHY*k?VyJ)C&|-c3i12YBP5koXKrr9Da&mmp_&O_&uj2y1-EX~k&E`M(!f1MlIJPMF z?KJMHPrUEmjrRP`!6@4M!RQ7N;MQDl^=IyU#VQ}C8d-_NZ)FTgiQZ!}cL52J)#E0iWu>Ro9XEpDWzKSFCf!&&i?*l||buT{S z_6I)xqo?6-*fpd)t&51Ce-1!=_Cv$q`oF(k|FP{)ec)I48~4+!r+DLa(>gg ziRRgP;vJu{zKY``*I)PT1Fza+^!rnRf9J#p^e9VzlmpwR&a>N;)18pFblY;a? zWv!FQKk1KpnV3d zciFgtPUE=t;onIC{Io|gGJ}x|={4}5)B@bUY!?mw^ z_$=`a55M^P2L=!S^-LN5Yw$gcA@R1qKqp)n_p08$na)uuuWdW@Go4eqfj8C%cUg1m z_Z$02w(@DGQ7>$L6O_Oa2rBKnWNPbWFh2ma5mbABxms{hnj2A$R8d(`8H z_x>z%+`VtxS@qK6KI*a8D{k22x1ay{=yhN8C&>YQK(gfikUVCb_s~1X?^}~yByH-U zcc1!2iI*R9hAxo1N_3Emd?~WNX6S%#kzd2$5$CokBhD$(^@tDaC!;uDJ9!_{zD3x3 z7vLK|*4aPn{+9LDqcy)&T;(s=i@0f>T<4#D@Yjv+c-5BRKU zNAGW+yzk1F?{?|#52GIO6(5wt;u~E*8DG7(D}CdpeiUEorSlZBGi~Tb@g*JPB91xM zmkiw~zND)dJmOn7WyGOCx)$-%;=7QToF6ZaTOsG3A-~G^v+Vmdke@tm>=(!%Qf`KL z`3Lst!t;XO>(hKqaMrxdZzrCBVR5S){YLY)YbNu$$ofu*zOZMY`rVwJ;r0aYf&Z7| z;x({6PwUu8Vt<$34NDk-&k|pC}rZ~=zuyJwT z)I;wG%Lzh_iv>f6ej_@_MSfOT-!yc1LLdH<|&F?E8o zf7ZC@&$Bg;4m+0tKk2aejKcfllIGvaAH`+<{S*1Kf$Yw3ehqz)f0~zT-9hoJPPUIUR5t4? z$iD*dUDXGC1HG5L2RJbGkgIbCdTyAex8g83bv(~Ud!2jL^Mv%CKWW15$O6l?qsHx_ zcar#up@-i7ds=lk={t*ztbMYeq7SvmZTdaY}J42a-*%?9N?@4Wvl zJK}HTrN7QDIjA4Sm-@B|HU9REeO8Y<(J;6UeEWu}*WJ8V8-H6pJ`O~1eQ~3gb`RXR ze<1#b9&OKVUysxWoqy*Ebw01avg0#e=f4Yx;5vG*_k3{cD=!!=>%*QV>9g0lJkq(e z$@fFYeC~E^BF|fS^P3+&bK}u_-`1W_vi`V*4HJL6^5#uZgq%pp>6;*&rSCoD^RLH0 z?aCW|d*R2%ky;pd6x$B;AiAhzuVU(K)LCy)Dw&6i(L-!0mQ?zqkB&QDMb`p=yBs4V?e zmVZ@NTve`{{G1E=yWaB`EK#3|2Wu=h2!pnxOZXP?K*Ap}@B616QxCuASsu_I>d(m! zjr|eWyGnH6i*YT>`huYYK23fl58t8Rs~)~ge8aWsYc%XPV|F2lwAN?ZtM{hgn_q#v%qjN^*rjTcK%KHx+ z9{J(S)@#aP_|>YvV}q|e`1zY#s7L(TY~L5$)_p&w_N(!I$jX`H4Q0)*|8&J` zF8BrCuNtrCtf8E@UVG;)r(IO4Iz58@MbB>8D?L&lcK)3wlwS%gJ3eE3S5l7?-nYS( z^WDS0ta{nImU{f>*_GFyd%)>$K|T7N|b$`td z;%B=2(6}EzZS0>>UU42VAf4{3c7FhLnm1`)r}4D=*>V1XPV-02!?bP@``nlg@zeMx z*ylV_`+0(T4$}KmOqZ$8NB%h2_3YI=QR~4P2U8yz`vq~FXW5=l1-|%iXGhVaZ%|If z!s+~Shin8yKIz#^Q2WsS`zw);j^m8yr__d%>ueqBlO&z> zEBu}(e!267=m+}!qsm1tU(^r!EJN>6f4SJzryp`KY#tco-Qss<3YR!Kv`0R6*e-hd z*e>9E)H7l5!ML&HeT%fIhdv4N&k#x<`+X1GXEc7Vh9beW;gesNePrz!Jm(U;|G$mX zQ~tBRhc)sKe{ZTv`TD*`)98cyK!J3SfjEnwVB}*Hb}#xVHi?gP$v5TU3&dv)9)9xQ zJIR}R=%ME|!Flp28amin^uCj$yr>$wz|IX?ri}PC8Na@V*Y9Et4IcUqIseoBI`%(f zzd(;6{TTn+WS-6XPEL*V{yLQZdxiy1UY_krgv$S_PuFnzln9k?_Bkjl?$OJ}{Q&nv zKi{GspR~VC{(VB_Thh=W-$XYp-wK8v{ZilEDNW)dS(a-azDN6;1|QZhI}`Qe{`Oud z7F-A4`<3HYyymTo-wPbLVA-TdW_e}Pc>X8SGTuJ0d}t{C@M_%X|J%kTxh%5vA>!}`a- z)WeU>D;@tXq4cr&AC~X=tHyeT<@@|6C;gKkeTGo^UNCg%XQESl0@H8G8M;wkdiO2m#k`?I|0tR=;#Xi?Y97AFyl)sh z^zCgn*+1G7_2Y5xMEdU&#}4m#!vDQ^2Na=aPx1S-^Mm4U`w!x=NEfsV^Fx;HXZ4pH z=_G%l>GG#csQyy&=sK()5K2$mUu-`=83Kaq>-(gi{)KHf`X>Gk%g^e!#`z0>B(8Sl z0p%+{V`q-@WR#zz17G+f_<_taZv%uedUYNv3QY@D}e4FxX29J3A-#KiWdMl^< z?Xg|Rs~XFLN%}~ic0@ljwlAz7BuqW*RsIWh$Tw~1!uo;YoilXk2PIP;=}Y_T9zH>Q z)8L_Rf7N6^=$QJE9@jd5R0Y{T2P`9aHh;9v{@mjpy8qnQel(7H@JWBi@kxDlvcK3o zM1F`4?clHA|IsB_WP2dP^0I8|A-6@jJwoMW-OwTa`u*V|*Tumf{%n(OFi9VoXF2-0 z$@u$umN50uCrSSP`n$bfSbu7L{qfgtwbxa@K5013?t#&J6t|Z1cZu?4cg^Sne-}vy zzG43E8+z-f;UqrNVmV$N`vd;V5uY;nuzr#?_0U88LoiJ~c|$j{)4N|3nU^I)hkjBw zW#|=U{5l?fp6z=EKk6sXnCvG*QxARh9<*SR^RgE2KRw=G`s`n^&yW2CJF4u5TG!M% zTFTJDj)Ex%cC6@rmHpGh55MH_br0V@&*57hzIwL9cRhTZ_<_L(dPJgUS^ZZ=s%N?O z3E~5vEV;1m(e?I?wVtPWs%?jUkePRUFXchxU0%8Cn?L^jm;49JQD3IKSFqvAt)9BY zm)`f{(Ke9nN4HR$Km7itC_kuFVq*t#m#zY_B_v-(g?+R_AyBTvz0rvAwXbLq2ih#otMG|3ZH2^2zf8TJH@z$AY+Z_?=Fjm6)Hq z{^?)5@RcWkBkFT+b^58lU0b>S!M)!Y9X*#oFP#&pQ7`$`>J{j^s(9Ndt1mSf4y4tkM{hH=7Cz5cJ?kkcbz}i#$oCDx8zm~9pc(x+5XPpDBi?(4Sg!I zYVlk}iGJx5MoBj?^rQa7^>m$Qkl(WFT)bqD|NWT8kH+=jqjM2jFW3Aw|Ak4r^?k0k z*75lqYwxFsv-*Uf*7s9yAIrsj!v7vk$CIb;a_RegvTtbU0)MX5d6dLQ#{A*u_<2tM z3?cjhe4Xuc29NuWKc6U=dMn4CD+#;5)=j%Gf0S9@GIXOj@cycNQe1k54)>*KZ5$Wa zQ=&a751%GJGl^djmHh^f@w8yd=-2bizcTTGElV!++r{_h_&XHZf7t1B>sx-C5k2Wz z{`Y>ay#q_{e-B|^^v^hQ zJ;pq11N@@>uaakncmg8sk|n793je*i2IZmMX#C!3^8Qg`eV5SJCw9KGZ`S*1L+^W- zIu9LoU&6TG*xT{l1d0XM55N4?x1RptfBzbPBVVhOtMNzo$K37XerWk@hK9j)=CeL@ z_LpiWjs6buZccoFfZt@FVB|~Ve8;$<-`7%o%+y1#9`(|ACOcDxE|9xQbdZaFG|&2? zp##22er1D4f2o-=@?wE>P2$7nAHh1kH!sutV_F=_oY%aR2ESn2Lu;>n$7x4FZ}?aH zG~WXvxW4=4&Yk-ox5?;~0{j*C-Y=IN(86DdFFXHc2sJOuvkW@OksdFj9v|Fh-`l?M zsV}}?_0r>JAcE`O-`@G3mv`^G9)Bawl7n)%DPm6PI)5(6U_m|{#ZM;L&$>!>Cg`LW>{V@ zc-U1m>g5|c-`4AdDG4dJ%w_<@Xy~oY0bs=-|x#go&o#Z%hu;^JN@LXU43v4&$CPR zNRK?_mwY`~mK@ppH0trhi*Ao@cho)is$S#A3Do2KFKyg9{lI68o+q_3&$-dPj+uUkio~`6N2J z?7wd?_`B`r^{A!+=ZX1Cr4y^a0wu>9LEz2M|C_k|vI-1#FN zmj2Gk(I0$&YyN&>aPEcrR0t)n^p(l+R&?MCyBnnM5(1BS_e~jgXH>p)dAt2{jOwS; z?AG}62<`etecR1WxI6I~=wa=C7wg~g-3{(P;;DnfUH!_H(dOj3isYak`LIBJ%Y^bv zon^;od~Whzl=F;TF5G{`<9_)A)oUDlH|y^${rbcQ=eC(gec-P-$w4_FSu&4GeQlh7 z81MY|U^Av3dJm*8@$zHd&>@dS2f2u6iS>0u2Yj3Sng)+JcT5>^PLr-reAu`KI;}71 zdlB+0^w0%5jZ-N;M{6BJG=QMf{HZyEPU{L?(q*`A==0Ng!-BW2=+o(WzCt>E2im98 zI?IrB)8uM>B>omR9vAtYBg+r@q4Sr5iLbl-$PyL^tAs7WK4Glk=+lJYkG#?M%Jm+R z{B7SC09_~N#s!U&TF3F%jijHT*5{J%bL|CnPBgy1!?T-2w7yi}_t&8(^4~u%8og}X zKcJs}?^yF`ofpj;x>3HfTwXD54}6b)seANI;#&qE=o67XdDeGLeOP}Un0n~jSn1-u zs3+I$W8WC-74)|aQl<<&^FMX|${9TR<$@`X`UmMs#LK_%r!L%g{O_9TIYi^4ZHMty z?~#u_@DVWjKL1!gPp2|hG!MP=Mc41LJBo<6|9-pl zK|SQ8zUll_z03JS>jU$|J3eE5p9w^8J^P#;4*AS8pZPNU9r$fdd{mbHC?k$qn-Y{i znv~O?khgT*xohg7cUA59oFo54FQ16}D$zj?#68LSc|!+$f&B6wK1zJi;E^X4Q%0UN z8Lv9=VdFRQr0>1Qv)q0J?9@1}aYf@reCXl@yGC)`$CWj%Xx-H23+ObCtAC5men(`v zcxnAw;|}B_&-~xnC|@y-1LW$yP^F%d+cb2DLziX$9C}`KSC09DK23bw!^enEdHB)~ zou9G>k9g)y8S(5fjz!{?udr7a;#u{+bEWx$`k8Hq{+im;>Hi~EeCJ&oe&VzjJoiuF zY3E(fXZ`s%-uC2IY<2a!Tz&BU5l^1vpdNni$&Ra>9L*0BEIU49J?^BOtK)CFBmcyU z|E_w?yI#oppM3ty&)V$VEBmNNe_xanlmn6_^RD`YyruK5rm2VC3oMrj<;Sj}3*@d6 z9rQr_hpbODC-Wjhe9GVv=d39s&JFr2PkdOvg?>8ss^4wb{XN&8?1zN|UAaQ2{%X&g zg!wD`?lB+qC;xnJe?sqI93g-GKCI4JM87rRhn4!h^XR!_{_tCpbn}z+krw4F7(DLN z{(ex&)Wbj1euvi1YXZ58`b_)%*q-4FJ)0~K4IcXV=VD`5kL`wk`8XGFa95S>lZFm@ z7df9*zA4UGLl@-D1_e`wURC<3>fwj?IX~AY@hjTIw+tS3=({b^U%GbPiTV{Qw4d}s z+VS1h@7>{Rw--m-&&c0)-nEN;+u5&u2a=CKSiYr54+4xk+V|dx4R8M1c`v);?H7%X zUytS)-1mMl>$kn+t>w$#amcGsgdTDJ9&MF;m5(GJfiOLqMi0cJMn3wzS&d%{zaQr> z`iK7zn)h0sqO6C;gz`pPlFL%1W=Cp$n6j1##Ya6;SdG#-l-jf%9u6sW;XfwKE-e7w|+kp=G(0Ibffz$>A)A`U7q!2LkIkTdR9GriTH+x&k^7D@O{R;=i!UQ4?TR8 z_*iRfAN1+5A0<6}f%uGv&k~>W@Dbt*29I+o8LsOUId1g`(;T15h8}s|Bz>On(e~rk z1>y1a-$NRD@(OI%r991364#IY1idmBI{p>XOD{W5LH_#lkm$1}`P9iLPpEOfV&oxz zga1dDV6*Pz0~y3^rTp48?GVof%R>*pz;f)nV|@aBm&{X=rryfw{bfRaq_Cyqlb@uI z3~6uC;33DKe^g9;Sbxp1zHaCc2Y>#d__Ylk<{tx7hF>zYKYqj5e&9RIhvX!FMUD83 z!NU%nAILF}bEZDbjsfQ<1w%I)&sVs07>%nsM_Ms-u%kIyj`U0!^N7kXTwDgkD_>mp zxPOtC(f{&&@Z^nSe?f1pr~2=M+wX^iPS4?bzSg{?^vF1mMtxNlV^J}fSvQ`~30 zzpVCxEh7)l)p75;czQ3pA0i)eqc=G}EcabA#7Fuic`k5q-SGXBah$fEYv1d~yjb7) z(Z1L}x8CH&kL>rQ^N^{?)1`%PY*{Qr!9``q#r0bGS=Z3=aIEdYn_4Fjyq2~{9as;(LoqwCdEAESU%9FiX7ZzQ^ zv!hNqI)AA+M%!aM&>xa4H-0;gFYsmZoA>DR#4mXGH1Q=5KVY1y9==R`!{9OA$}X*U zw@p3#DSHKbrXKN|w%#4NWo$Rb*@P*>-aPfm8a(=W&Xm!Q3jcC`DiAL{5EotOpLOpX zgz`vvY1^TnXuokYK9IlUo`u)`dB?(Ny&LsfZ#s$%pM1d1Z+g;pPgxC_u)9lrhJ=!5 zp9=$fR*4SnV0Zlc&Mz54;9>W?DZ}nM`7RJ2whlBJm%Q`j+W((sxAxV)wGAXkB6r{Q zz!$m~{rn^N8+LanZ#y7@>o=#&?|J@;XO4yw*garYF;HgI;*x;y6{GaX(Gp>in1^)HqdSS#o60_SEC*6D}(3`{wtI zz9Sm=eNKE(jk4@RISBpKa~nO%84w1vixg?B)3aGkXMwpV_BzYSlGzhPJYcIOwZD~q4~?h)(~9ooUJ z65G`Yfrnj9Q-)nBmOF&g>?;44zi)Zjiy%1?x$L{IKH{A9&o~8tBi`wbvrFf$|FqTR z^)0@fJQ?+{JIDIv<~x?p6VNcYj{Nsu6ZP*Ldjac!j=zx#19R1FURAtzU!{>?+pt-s|5a=xa@c=`WpFP`r}hB z2pf+ZPnsN$JEYHT;_S6DV0U~|`r(a}{^*cC^`kK!c4ti)c1Kvw6I%W<2KNd7+^e4R zr;Rh3?>&J=UUm5!wun6N;CsLm`LFrj(G-}xsCDWOPfdQu)d%b7-uzN>P>;N7Q{O(J z#;NF!$M!;w^w^wwJZsYjT2I(4zT{l-G1O!Cr~GTT*S_&>i~F3C1GxdolKFXMLf+DS ziJGa0-t#OM2<69?p+kQV9poa;J=RC>9NPzclK8m6BhD#PMx3kkQZGI4>go~QkGmJoDWXPNb$kotsRgZg%jJ)?Z|&L5Uk{}bmQhI6C_#wq`I zvZnoRyw(Nu9#)S0zzF^>vh2@mYK9K>CRuJ0T7Bdj*x`RSUwN#2x9yP6I4WIJ1&C~x_@!=0bCh{+Fm-A1CQ1Y^8kDrf`f1*P>*qtYRnGks7 zS=E$b_ki{`h!4-RV136sr>lN2%kJB0_xk-e`ri9*-(tym`9IO_9iMRYH!e#Ybr$qQ z{QYyml7o8qCEj&@NfXL1IhGxtvH$O&9<7si|J&~(!`)P`aqTbEqqI%z>fhw{*bw!B zzvd(d<$z?#c+#7Yw{$!in0n}4W4T2rKgRAJj}wTe=pYyIOtC&^=tlWXJ_`nqIG0Qr zaqcs|RpP_rJbu4i_rJo~POqbH-{5C-AygV&=ns*YcmE@Q#fxqo(L>)M?|=UL;;EmG z?T5Y*ma~MG55c z>)X(;MtRlPSiezz5#Kg?0KQ!j8JhCQ9?qj<|L6Eli(}V2C#8NdEsm)@9lzVi zaQ)raTyW#&%1xX zjRTsGJlgNrMt|)Qdp=t6$#{VYMf7w&(@woQ3xi?|n_ zH+i3^vVK6w?lBStzbAXnAIp8mcJ#ca_Yn?p{B^(j%l2oS8+N~{KVedj66L7>TRo5` z!zVgD{QFgp?VvF9ZLmBfw0uTJkxujP!gJQ&`thS95#@4AFqv+BJU z-FvsI&yh~;Ko9+j#4oqs2EJ);-A?@}%s&`svs~}e{qnLS+t=Q7!qXSOE3fhIHYgHY z7e@cMdG6W6E%Engy!xfnJ3%OUc7JO$Ua=nS5SI+g3kHw=TQp_Z-J#tT;=}uIFy4E1 zFRqt|{GOS$`|Wh}y?;LQ#xJf;{S^A4Uh9$ip3qO;z47V?_I~xK2)l>WC;lsEzvS6{ zMA$7l*_|eRo)CE0T`*&# z(nr7`Tz|OlhVR|_|&<_2s$@-q51AajJ z2OhpmeDt?YZ}36BCQKRm8Yf+v_^J8o<$>a?e2`xt2mMfabr=xA75~+XOv}~pOu~qh7R!*9rQrl%B*h~I^cV>uVwIvTi28kw}RqD{Is~GzdhNnG|o?p zo7PRP;7$Bzr(g8yKkT@^1ij&J-B<3S!?sxeyYo)`$J*mi4}awP&VNNh$!niA`J5&? zw1eGM(zghKhus}hhTTb)`-I_k2j2zb`kbDp^ZPr!KK;b4Kj*K{VLns%wVR)4-#Br< zqu=Z=r*5S=7j(h}`X%50A^nltU40%7ohzR}AN;*!T+#e({=?2Mv8OqCHJ00iXpi|p zX)AC3M0pKDD-V8)96Rl|s<$P0YC zWFD(?*R*5N?!<$W_6^A=>NpY>kSwDadZBOm^6vOF~Su>6YsY3v8+ z9p&%tBnhRD&98vZl75r@>!e-!{TBVMkMgHr@dg!Y; zoM4)HTcDhtp@-h>Dd+AZe;NA;dZ$b|(0fJu>8?KK;j_dqc=&eQ(U%N9;2Wu$GUhv3 z(lv+=Y+7>JbvB)A(>hyWqht2gJyi`c@9I2%a-P^HfAw1{2XR?=w$s;NXUqO|>=)=8 zXE{%3`HbbST=Lz`+-k>X=KAVxPVXxDPn)Ov^X@k3JGcDkX3W#AUeH_LZ7FZP{JNj! z_=1|BC%2`4KIr;;@}aR`;O_zRRC0&ZXP$Jz!$;7kO#H0%RXx8b?)ts*-+bZuU-#n< zzS@_HUg!KcZGBU11$Ay9_P0s9{Br<3>YXN?Z(u$EAR^R7$ zgV8?7*TvtL?wWS!--@$;E@5cskngd-J3H<74Kd#6{o*F+)1-r3_*d_tEZWEKxT0QH znEnOB$LgOp`81N{-q2yZEKimr4O2$`3>e22 z@wJfkIpjh8Ta)X#k&TWY?Pto*HV?2~o8fo9KDaR=6Nzm9*vFz65&0?!8%Z4f`r?xJV6o-1eBt@ZiSRzK^XbGL8z73g8@ z-idbaa>&>A_})=_joxp9-SNo#NBNW{)bp@iX96Gj_ipm}^VQGZ<*mEkx{)vE#jM|T z#k)`4{~yO~kNUtLbCQE{K(b_B*rI&Y2mN))^LNM8L+=vHHA4AmVCWDp(Sa}G6`P~I zgu>_8E^F|JW8Rbz$3Ej%Bz{^P{r9k!+wUFeb%o0_dwv#peV40e^nhMNQ-)p*mSZcN zeGCK4Tf8uyl)d+EmFLs)t8u8)>ke}H?eBXJ9eUude?t**C{mt&k4*gR``?Iz=+F*! zRoSjZ2t4fSm@@3jvfL*O_xIBIRe7z`d)E9)^N7Ss=eORfopM@ZfKIqV_kT#g&lg|$ zM$9{`zoED02levg{bIzB{{(HO&JX54>h5a|K8H3a4^0urjQ4(8iS=DVU!T|p&c5a6 zSHXVXe|i4+7T!2FYj5(u$9?YfUqMeh{yad1*6wuZE}QN6ksV$A%9TY=p7Id&$ge8( zZW1cLx-2_B1+mzYrbxqF*#v-!*i=4{2}T;L%?q8;8GB%Ni{-w-!|tIe!|r*OV~=zG2)BE@Ppp2ged1~T-rpzA zlK;Y;yLKPV^G1>M?|jv@zx{9aiMuH`j!oMqPI>3->Xg?dv~h%=;!)?H<@SX!-f2Bb z-%XRBrk#WI{Zycw2WlU9<)iUajr6;J>Ro&PH-1XKXn8;7z30&mjA%1y3 z1>@y^IbXYn0`GYH*4cx8fA*5|)GuNEOP}+XgHJ4f>Jas#HudTgYQ8qPe=(k~>3x?E ze(1U7fA03zCG)kHQqI%w``SUTzIdzA@3jT}Yff??Hy~Lu9u_tpk2_)WwUVhv|4*?z zPpJ7?&CsF$iw<%}{h#%HLkE16<)Oi2T!?Kl)(iPwrJs_-hmQ-vc}(wolFs!^8xM8f zX)P2Dt~d8P4_tN8LucS`*jtf2eqXXb@AA`rcNXKS_#BFc!L`#D{^yj9e{ygReEgFaQ1(@PQov_iKDP74p;fP&Kb17GAt zne`1r2YiS8S{{CZ_^!btj|QfUJQ^~8qEB%4Ov|ID_q!jOk0~zdKh6*1-?4fXEB4sp z!pg7idi9N}*L+gnLAd|^!|vVT#cLC;e&tI4cU2_^_3&eX`c?=RPPXVe4P`QpR$H-6knq!;<&*2ilH0D zmvl9QM;x1`j5uaU*C9SUj!U2OT8F#wYSwd}_NStoJAXXdb@VjpXRV{_cPF$ihv~oVMRsr98A9tpjg2xemO*`WB($4Ej-jAb$DhykLHJyIV)pexvqbrhPx9=+VzV z(fM)O_fvZQ^C{`4eLqF}ZCdx0KJ{H(d|@B*sYgEcykn5pi~D(H(np_U^M3rj;LX4& zxIVC3>Bfi7ZE{`}eCLS!jv2Poyw_2?e-TIdTQG0rp#Nx{Ti>~m9sYZOb;&tuynYQk zw69lYeaG;Je63FlCRpD$bkHNkeLcz7I(78PW4{FbaD$X7TR-Z%%ejgAu^%_5V|GgZ z<(e0K@Y}nfi2T#~eVOeZtsm=CrZ^)8-K9n*FP&c`dyQOSVmMkDO+G$?(VgPW#9DJ&Oy98}y5}-nYB#(0A^dZ1-sW z)irX$@)Ld6DP-$#8W5zq3`ACJwN#)Yv@MfJJf;}S-_lxwkllw*ecewF08h3tBJ17CUN#d73hdtJ>^bGgi=4tmi z@fR$SKjcBbruTkAZa=4AeTshVN1>lxuh9Lhd6?sS%yXarAw4TW2VAgQ<6)ZPMw#@E z!u=cAuw=Z|`I-5rkMjz4^}X+IBv@Z0ls_cDM*OVrU}U}TSm}F?nonB37;p3)D?OKd zth`&fc;q`q&!wo>I^FYV=+)=_{0~3>>_LjYN`hy)`@}ST*Pvl=?YH9CSG?ew$3F*ugHN077oW#@PTv2%s`S~pK1mltv?*`l2_iB$puhv)D098)CT@fqjk zVL$}e0S|6`+yjrl>wocgFpkcNkIK?tW%*ZS#Z_hHCCYO_zt!)93HGSZz=M%zIX}e+ zgSPHsIY9^{{GsoZiY{g9;rAB#>wOjV*Rr7t>|G@~@WuVK&iam_1HMXrJrAEEe(2%* z%%9kn&Mxt<5ufz%Y2q^;e!za0^YCTj3kDz96DgZA#@8Xow;J)`&vU`~1~0!B`}vgj zftC0B!LZ<}KJe>LKl0AE{04v9e!3kH!FBgR=`SDstMl*2--u6iE9aLaq2$F+8$V|t zKB7ZA#34)i0wM6QyJX6+yGwhk#80z3ew}xp-qzh$HQp+}AP07(c)sCgR_wU{C426C z=^wtOdaXxn&H8Kp`SZ%Q`>q?kev7)nbwaII3=JLP zDLTkSJmXtCdozT>=h<%F;1TBqQ%0OSjBknfX>rba>y7fO{7*MQd<1dUdhlCDm`LQW zpGs|CJ?EYximxbbrd>=hl_!QSYzoxLeS;9*zBlwnts{By*I+qHBZ zrg)s|KQq^1c#gJ0{?qo8{BwIP($D&?MqH-T8Ht!tC85o`3ru+{I0RXNh+lpkCOCiNeP3c$ew5F0e%Aib@X}N7`^9njlc6W_NB!>xAcE_RryTas z+3(8#5`T}zzipjeNkYkM^1L1BkUvq@qdXe_SS}bm@~33Vqw$Y+SBVeHpTJjtI~9zB zOR%?_v#XosIQ#|&b3B)u-^-Qf`MsIk-mcu@zDkPE5uKAl5Lch%zIcV_dGmaZsJ++KSGhj9aD*$@ zj&!hHa4@>g!ND;OW{-8Sv);jZ_N&D4t{gqV!8~D==TqlDK>AZ09GvQ4yzF4*qYkE+ zKiRWgIeCtQ)tZBu^Brt|$-%}~SiZo)+Jz1#E+V|x!RSw&pW>Iea_mwEhhKBB@(l-@ zmpfR#(!oO0!8m{4B66cESHI_A`X&cUw>Vh*zJvWAI5@b?!RYM{_6UnVbmhX29L(M6 zVEZQyw(fGUemCoX>fro6EI+})#Q!-Mz1P7WVUFLQiSoNAb;8tB9bN604p#MD5W?(l z9X`@`a7dW?ohx?;TYQhF!1qg<54rjp&$Cw_cIDnb*pBBa+dOC3;yJbY3tWA9&h`7m z3I~UTnGHA|@ccxA=LWLeA1`qKG`6$jljgo%hx;yZuG{yxZlBaTFV`hs2mqliNE#JoMSK(%1js)4vA|_^l$bpza&T9(B;@o2{q@pMZ9B70Ku6 z_0ykx>&NdOi4W>Gs1Yx^5AOA!W7s4Zm&fZXdY`A|(StTW;v!QV^PQ;OtQ zGkizuDc*Oi#IHTYj!J*hjxQbd&NoX(@bl-tiRU?ggw4aOJ*~rCeuUY*oIM5dhYpbM zue*w0m2}om*6&&ml>M>^5c1VdaNx~HOX@1hWW%>X&KayRu z^sG`o=peW8oXPo>u-JFI?(Z#M#fAu>NE7LF@1Gr}Tz==%@RW zpq_8Kl&|x|k(AR%dM9=c?|(_sSvl}q(>u2-JE!@%<9*LY`cLzV@+V$#dWqiZ0ee*z z9C&v5zcVF1@twlsp?>F&yW;;?{k%Xq^7A~us~~>Tr!qw!`Ju%7>a=l1d8GHdP z+3`p3t%cDAx-B_3G^Bos7dgLW3Bh~RPrdUs;#(k{>;*makX^cOgxLi>)K0MD%e_8) zd>BrVD?jPHs`M0p>8Ej8Eps#!HX^Q`>am~*wz5g9a z={YUW+mpz^%y=^LHmr^w5e z<~j7Od+))_(pP@<=OwEGfM|CUK-`HjXeZ~t?-{2TQzZ$C+ThK+Zi?`}Kkw^{tF-n@Pm|LT))f`s+R*sOOWur*C!2b4lzq&Q4$7w$~qJ-?VXA{?_k0i(a|{F6Zx> zw@y=~UT6n@554<@__spzUrvr6SATqMPl;Ee+he`d`6XQdp^u)^1f`Fj*Rrp3{+#x_ z)|{eOf$bDO$Q#+Q>6Cm4IR^(j^c<`GscClT{wS#XWbE}$f5}fz>33<;`TF|rH_pnN zg~vEfCcSl)S^OJQ=6zxP8vZVNc|41M+IybRxG`-Wk@n_yv-tNPgMVzl^7jJ}PhF3t zU&XSM`B0rQ??{u*&xe?IK5CY|NpD^+e};`Ch*#g64~RZ&UIzN=lz2_!pZ3N<@t@XT zGv4^g+J0ynWUHeFn=tk zuW}2}jzfiw+<6S~wRB;272d${lMwXKGwIDkHLkTtXYI0j&YB;oonZWplldN>GVjZf zPVJ;;c9%!*PuNxW`nUWP=6}$~z28Y%jvju{bBMoh<;OwKdxE;J`S;nxn>_zanO9^< zXZ^EWURb)|@2UCT@Z?v$_es^?x>Mw?jyZn8TS$0MDp0um$t;5JaDbiWHY(Mk&hi1twd2*ZHJVSEpA#&j#|M%{f z^AG6#-w9Wqgq^bqY+SOQr}>fM*`1R2xi>q1T0f2S_4>K&3+v|-{g%J4Cwkwn>aT*+ z`fZnbN&n`Q{Ef_q>pz?_Z;eiwPir2k`u$QQ3l=H2MkqbY-hEJc(GJlQc{hBF^Ub(NFaBY9 z3jY4@56|j{*~d6vi%;3dpVrTEQ|9l}=%b!Lm($<&OMhM1<~7C-<)5JP(7&G+_L&@i zb5r_dm302NQrmiRzM*)9osUDj65jg5a`wUw<)fhHXa0I>cFOpc-*;*Mfgat*I1ev- z{c}0JZJhl3y!BsLoTjah#rKzBQw)&{|MMEM>NbOXK@ z<*&=y_#;kQClu89qVrwz?{N90^Ib)jAqV>VzxOA5YoxRCY@W{=_tZ`>_Rh&X?@r0{ zH0jh%dS+wc_n~R)|HUcu=V|LI{_ok$ilgR>{_~L4JNSD^KT>@B{gL?olm794??rLR zkj|H*`=_Ahcm8>-?38mV^$@bJ$amVj-v7M>>C+F<2mY*18Lz|UkG8-0_e<#x2>oTZVCh|x zek)IlJL%L8{A?Wk`2p&6L9XH_IPE?$^ze-C_!m9?(tql_XG(sCJ%@vTbV^*p z?#IX%jZcC)Pv<{}*1hK@={=th&yTYA+_#(`ZGO)>r>MLZoHkB%sh9G`|4zE}kE{;Y zKld1)i`$REUc|}&UbFNGyU&B(|8DUt`o@mo_vdNPiMhv^m;QHhrO&iHZhQSu^waju zqEntP!^Ri*$NxU8_)pWP>8%?qM?aCDdpW;~UgH$<4E;%YDL5@Zi)$wD2Se}sj^bY< zos|Q7{qHL3J{qJb4wV&eeBUn9PugZc82T$6So-*&NkWTH?PjlY$iu4S7 z{#fq5V)+JtFVQo$c2dvgl>17WbUr_gmx7w#`R9=Pp5GPMatPm1oV@XSxp5Qp^~XSO z^Vpv!!~eSAFXgY`w0T74kV!vQz4*!A1=3kRLjU*_`f2^v|BlLX{;~Nn>)eU-5=x~Gr-9TNGu6QU3NJn!wxi$3iA6wvp){VUN= z8-L^8{BgOs!0zjqY=TL?&pjZ_@crc$VR}awj|IXW;rt66zC<`AO!7U)9ATX>pK|mS z!WLnACx>qn*7)97T<>4-eWDa$i!jaiYZeHrgc-iq(j@E?#$W2>MEJf!k+4pfPC3FdVVviv8iYNVUqiPMZ!8^n)_c1gjwz%4G0r&r9TKugbl(TVT}6{8Nv=>gzNq(!ZKl# zuuoXzdUc&J!S&%PVViJBSl~KkjWCsSdgci$ge}4WVS?*rJ;EH4Xhb|m^oURSxgd>-Q{ud}C!epAyfD`}}Jg zgwyLgFHC=*UiN?<`X`QYew`;2UUEwwKK|iw{q;MvjY;~&IM{v?$eokk zHa^f_&u4-{JQQ z>K=V}T0S$LT|*DMWsjgAr~X%+ebM!k_USwQNe`dm_pf~W54)e>7R{OzIs;eAD@*@8R`5o5dFv0Pn zOBiMUs1mjb^USvjVT*7;n4$j)ggNS2CTtS+3FAgD^s_$4^_0N}`ab+*r*1@0zk9LY zk?Yp3UbC?Jpu^Yhwr=&2YZlfnel{+Gd4j%Q*CW51KJ<~-o&EUyDPRY_Pa$7H@jqn! zk!y}U?5HF6S%1V4tJfX2_L%W)Xv8;ObpA{e{_yUHH@~6!f{ky)h=ig3Bp7V3mL*L;4(IqH7feie*qQ!Q- zN%>303$>dDBk!B^gHI=U8W-ZECqAO@TNOOKz8@uiqStqye0-AoCO%%@NAmId{*8~< zcV&Ehlk1B?)W^!}fF7)>b&4W{hALQtL#03wp_YN2N28isp3fAB*rF7JK3-XHV%$EWl| zy&vV%>pdQyzuw#M@n!C#`FNd2_whO>ZSjbQ%7PldlsAfp{H*aSbMmA=b*{SL;dM?} z{K;qWJg|?~d0ii`^Rzy`&+*I0>)fD^*SS6)uk(98Ugz$7yw1P*c%5JK@j9pG<8@xl z$LrjdkJtGcAFp#RK3?ZMe7w$E_;{VG@bNl7;p4SW@8h)}@8h-q?c=rI?Blgx?BliH z=i{}nXYt7MHz4tXOR&Ouah=5<|BfRg&2~&hw!aQM-utHcT zZ1cX~BODUOcz;V0W(aeHL&6xx|0H3CFh^J*jB|V}5mpHk93Rt!^Mnh8CBiCUgRo85 zBODUOI1VHU%Y-$;CSixLPZ;@-8&~3lDZ(sap0G$*A*>U&2)l#>!sscEZ-OvQI8V4h zSR$+vHVE5j1z*-V^aha0%*nDGyq`=Do+SUU%?o*B-L= z=v|LJcAX;|{fp-@$%}u)$$QHSj(_*2@r!Q(0s4{d+kzeLqbHv2?vK3}I2hyiwMu-y zy29`Oc6qKR%kLO~FYK77yaFNRP2C?jCfFbd9?jPtc}(!I4&vZ~{@KHvAA02T$#1;q zy!V{3M;Y~joDF(>-qiY&@LIPEY+SrxujWaDsj~A+|41iC^jYH3IM8E*Jl6qLzw-h6 zZ!gC2z>|JG>e9h_ZJvBIkF2tM2NiCzEWT)m-y7)|`6x#}I+2$fXno4I3;ur8_9YEJ z*jM(xLvjB`dtM4%aKS#m9(dT7As^XSWLfrAS+;t@o`#W+a^I8@S3NJpB z!M>sQ9f6ZJ-d9T*Bm4Y%*_R+6*_UHk_7z#SdcvNHk&klQlwqHqFKoNz?CTXK^RsXG z!M-^6!^Cgpt1f#GHsC`1{CeOKzsSd&pJZQ}W!aZwS$xqB_7sR$xo*m^PwSz!-D9z@ zZTP{y#!K8dBz{l-(COPjHZIub*8>mxdgLSf;{W69m3?WJ#TV^h-#qaumrZ#z?r?v` zwtFo0)eXN<{F0OQo%X!{)6%(%pH~mPU|)-TWZ#fw*%$w~v)Aeg`%=Wqz6Dc;ecETU z?H-GLWy25l4YrxIFM9i?qkA6YBYu88@UX8&KC-XNvg{kOZ1seFu}_TqKgwBC9@*#Z zqe0$dv2VffgMCr&duPx7pEaZ3_yk|r=hp)d`%2^^`QOFUiklxVzYM;J-@KQnf2tjjK^-pSsb3E~@-+TQ=XcqaXIXZYShjwIT~*@2 z2jz|_KN`FI`1ob;gw$+|1L`BY(w}m6%B~#CzFh_4!3TEL zO&R@9>sOkmgAVrUcbWv%|MJI9_P@3#SMnb#gk1Qi=Do*r?x)|Nt+J7S{Cc#5e|pqI z{>goM(mzF(r5D=49~I(NZkuvI`#0^+2`ZoEhyP#p|Nr6xJK)EJ=g0DKdwmpjxR7Ul zJ@D{jpZ3d-wKFIE*kalDW0!dFfnQ^vaqUn>o@pI-ak3EL;a@$^2`bNqUY@1MPjaV0 z$bPLdgBiZ?A z?R&Iz&;x$Rd*jWe`ArT%9WMC6uLmA}NKt?Jq0X}W&}Lb2Ks)%MXY58f{<*OqkO$g# zv+dv?J?9E44=U>?$D6d_2m6M6{ujSD?DhTQp$jh9=hp)d`{v0<_LW(deRY<_7wuqA z%g9H0Xv(m!!SfHc-D9yYULE@j_C=pMd4J#Y%_r-pXh-(>^|CKTKC*9tW!YC|+3E>< zYDPZFT~mgAI$veiF<_s{f{I`1_{sPUJ-L!E2>oIAV2eq+SMPJ&O{l|#xcc?LBd)Q} zJO9bTn_6em(H8yGMN$@9a5~@m^rrx4T3<_`vR_DZ}okq9V8i<6Q3=5_Y+s z)8u+ZRnPT&zRmG@FU{wn1fLJ0oWJ%6o1Cw8Ip0X|{+ZzYBgt_!%JHI4*khh|nO7b9 zp>6C4@-`CVx@6bj1N$C+nlmpVC_C32bwuItwK##b+u^}d^_vbmW_%Dhh|}WwZu4B{ z=a-e&|LKtn-~0`*gWt9#UqPLts&G9>=W%rYM(1jDj;6%(m^wdG=Q?MK>)blu(&G4_ z^9C*6-+NqlDe$?e$aReNMs7UOKCJdd=eKnD4BKnpQu~V~&L1n3ALI9YwXdgrygcc& zPp5skHuE~k_n#Z&GfxP2Ax;DOGxi1NSKtvRjVpqBo_y0`M;^PDn+J%C_6_pqx%Tb& zUFTo*&Xoo6c>?|jEi}GtN8x?DN4R=r41ME6UJw6Z{ce zg1SGvDD|S3JU^9w{)=AX>hUkyM{8p{gLB=HA>{upyBD~j#K&HL{H-598rTtjE=Rod0Y2cjae?^SZf-n#*Y2BqUo=7es>q%WUnbp|@4W8G zE6_N&Z2Ju9Zo2yLi*5Tl+qDVrz4p3&wT5Tgm)L&i@9e#`ZQp0R=$D|@|H=;Qfe-A7B)&54=hko0hg^K_-FV-7#0zng-!g1>;I^?Xt>5y*s}1F> z(0(Jz@JBU-&ibit^n#w+KSX=$7ws2HUWx5mgk6O<7r3H)WeIwcTC5)SJ7UE}8I)`gwuv4yazaV^}}0oafpEE_}hwTQ0&wE1UK^vD?-Pxx$@FU`){Z*9V|7-}IjZ2R8Y`?f)in5K1 z_D3Zz#dZb4GU2SaR6TipQ?_wQY_)zgUKcmKX&{-1i~JJ(sK+cWxFzAjc}G<8lJq!MdSRneksu}D<0`?B$?JP z3AWpOi$=!!B}2U0(5@AF-wtKiUkstMekmKh(68crPC$F>7wyMNUY_l0giXR(erfyi zE)Mrg`B>Kvk9gtDua->fmo(eG{P;Ki#`+~kyxPDH^ds#9qYV2iA#~O+HKP~&qJ3So zw|>z+uH+Tju1VM-oaL9ECogqLxL*(f+UGRoJdW*e9Ijm!T&wdug~|n!CDuS-5}uBPA1l z(YU|Bc0c{!9sV6Q?svZG+MmDu`_8xR%WPLC{QHk~`KTH9SG9?c@xJrB8&67az?azI zw?6B|6Mll<^*#v7pi6ws*=6ah-&3q-`-t|ZQMP{9ezbIqvR#%iPdLl(1y5efl;Ky| zJ*3??T=eT#Tf2LtxAwqp?Q=tK*cbo$@^&X#4|?QVn(GEATf4PCExRLZmm$m%&a!*K zlh-um!0yH8iT0aZzP#dhKc47^%C|1t9kR==-w(^T=x^P33)XJA$tKjNiI1J@)6)eqDUO z4`t+iEribYhX(7}esSLrWg8dm6G~p0?b?Jr!dY<{c=9rrhxdng)%m5=cwi!*lWd=7 zyLB%(@3Yn~CE}$g?OLJzNt9uKGlb6irET=W_^ka#w6}iI{-Wg7*se!7B%I}!=oMo> zKwi$2ZN4^Z&M)Wec1}_MdXa1YlP!P$D%-xwc1^-7@BZ4QCSO-| zi7%Y*+8=n~apetC@P_l}koDpTJjMy_n~E-V-Pfd#gl$pq5Vsgk=OMQI-BoJ*0X&?`;I7EziXdSey^}y zhpT|G<_d-%Uty{V2$nRBAL#oqr^Z3fyG#2n$DDA)K}Q|_`gLoMUcdIp zH7ATJgS=T>Uygsv*}d`BFTV2ouU*&;1o)1OazOhoD*Mo<*L(3koywwD{F0Azd98Ku z1?p2J6usK(yH1;-BDjPX1P=O(pPo-8Z%DpAz4+;SQkr+QNuRuWoFCRd%5(7-UqN4= z9={tR`ZD?Y^ePYdyzduF)KHm!vz4!`>zv{IPqO$0+-=6f3 z@=xE}dO8>dSDbW3k6wokn*2RM@y${1x<{}2I-gr)zwm;PY2&5)@GO6-UiS}`qt`e) z(}X^M%}YfuJp@HB|LMJU9k#5JuTQW1)OX6{uLaV#r|47TezW-b(AP)n)xQ48YbWC? zK25&gC3}Py^!Yd5_gE@AFXFep6HuX z_~+j`slVt2#b5r^IRw@B$v1v|cs?{%I{s>}c7o!sa`gz;-_?JF7Zknf^?jh{qawJ9 z)T8d{qx-YYwMw5X>AD{M){b59{V%7#%4OOc{qCf_dywA$u0@*hO?&ifNw4p;$i6P` zTMHh&>h&E-*)O~x*xLC_ac`%;@}W(>KE2A?msLIqFDU*hXZSv^zPly7py;J<#OsgA z8=N0=grZk}(t4TN52=6IqhFNAbHb7X%NRKUybN{zSj$ z^!MpiuCTvIf8hniU;ap);q+I$)8xNED0;QmKJ25_U*A#P3XFnFeA*s=**E;aq&`*B z4L$np9lMCm(}{1Feox*sIX;|0dYu>1cv59P=L~)De75AfW@S^4=ejJPGnxh;w3~X) z=a|EeT>F;wYxiD!89va*KGzM%XZL+y@u#D2+Tn#zSI>r#$lx_7L$3CjGB=Oy13t&| z?;d_`fpmdxi&sEDH&1-YWUg!mMp{L*<+DF3;92p>D|(>g(sbm~8X;vY?i^KZ@I zuXTm)GW_j0t#ySg=_`Z-Lg}OZXY03dz6=-hFv{oZh3}8^#r6{qKUX20@Ao3{^+`T+ z^DMU}@sT?HW%Cqr7xO7JPkf1x{+&y+T=nn? zmKz>E%5vMo59pVk!Q1@Py3mmI$~!^mWAB4n7wVF4><7*+pI-Mdtqb+p9}{esVLRnh zk?&J@ev2&d{D+61YqGtcCpF?b9{)~w|DTK8=JfaTM|ooN8~LMr@bStA4?mYDe_zim z@kK(#J;idx;BCCLZdPZ#{4VInOY3HF(zm>J^1sg6`1&XQ*ZHSp?jz{u_gr~I@ZTeg z{k+6;`SYX~U+s_k_!z(Q>fz@qZ14N4NPK;g|6HEsmcd(pX&tT0dihCE{!&@%dK&+P z7ZknbU0T;mlmCD)al7-I=+z&z&e&&u4j7MlkN%lx7+hM{Yt#P)wksKWyD&C^Hg-de{V^1hH@yN*Zy zVkj0|T9?!Pr=k1KPbSBU(njIWCwbEO`K{+u8$ZNV&!;|K&!-kYj`u$o?+bkQI+_1X;^Q8^MtsWPt-adk$g*B}BdB;OzS@V#k#B)8Z}=l# z@`LXm`N7A_4<3GQK)yCVk+)sqqxVeup+$Vc;H|ydhgj};4EpOmEl;0_<^_HpRw>Wd zvqXGjiay%6XtQ2^7xewFeT6jX=Lvfrf2|8^UnN_kH%u zYZ~(DefRF?J>U7x_nh2)Y4pUu+_&&N_boineGAWX-Qsz!TO1#< zzw7&13O)y-{UL!|IKB_Lbo@5t+VK(OOWIwKl;B%)xfLu7f3%Ok7o98oM?-F{pUfX{e7wlYVd)Xg}Vpn^gdD7U)=ky`+ z(SF7k93L|1*>=ddOTp)+9NRv|6$_-ZT|}u@^f|vWZdt?bF7lP8d>IEk$JSm?;WpaFYJFsgBd#0{@zCXnHWQO&7iTgn1 z^j}Ct^20ic`fqW+xpDfhR6FAPM^oIt`>3b)zwP&T*ZM&`b7a!R-(BRN7+&%{M?J*& zhn~Ao<6MU6PnEN$dY;kvnc~G3fD g6l=t53*#?2ZzvD?JX#?RH2SLk8GTnQjlQ_{7PNsC-~a#s literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..8b45614 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean @@ -0,0 +1,848 @@ +import CoreReader.Logic +import CoreReader.Agency + +namespace CoreReader.Evidence +open CoreReader.Logic +open CoreReader.Agency + +/- An observation records the outcome of a specified test on the represented world. -/ +structure Record (W : Type) where + test : W → Bool + observed : Bool +/- Compatible worlds reproduce the actual contents of every recorded observation. -/ +def Compatible {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (w : W) : Prop := + ∀ r, r ∈ records → r.test w = r.observed +/- Inferential support requires the same claim in every evidence-compatible world. -/ +def Supports {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (claim : Claim W) : Prop := + ∀ w, Compatible records w → claim w +/- Articulation identifies concepts, premises, reason contents and an application limit. -/ +structure Articulation (W : Type) where + concepts : List String + assumptions : Theory W + reasons : List (Claim W) + limits : Claim W +/- Nonempty identifiable concepts and reasons are procedural articulation requirements. -/ +def Articulated {W : Type} (a : Articulation W) : Prop := + a.concepts ≠ [] ∧ a.reasons ≠ [] +/- This application model interprets an adopted option through its actual outcomes and stated goals/constraints. -/ +structure ValuePosition (W : Type) where + Position : Type + Outcome : Type + adopted : Position + selected : W → Position + outcome : W → Position → Outcome + objective : Outcome → Prop + constraints : W → Position → Prop + starting : Theory W + reasons : List (W → Position → Prop) + limits : Claim W + relevantCriticism : Claim W + response : W → Option String +/- The adopted position's claim is derived from the same selected option used by the outcome interpretation. -/ +def ValuePosition.commitment {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Claim W := + fun w => v.selected w = v.adopted +/- Assessed consequences concern this adopted option's actual outcome, objective and constraints. -/ +def ValuePosition.consequence {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Claim W := + fun w => v.objective (v.outcome w v.adopted) ∧ v.constraints w v.adopted +/- Articulated reasons specialize the actual option-indexed premises to the adopted option. -/ +def ValuePosition.activeReasons {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : List (Claim W) := + v.reasons.map (fun reason w => reason w v.adopted) +/- A joint witness excludes inconsistent starts and impossible adoption states. -/ +def JointAdoption {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Prop := + ∃ w, Models v.starting w ∧ v.limits w ∧ v.commitment w ∧ + ∀ reason, reason ∈ v.reasons → reason w v.adopted +/- This declared option/outcome adapter checks joint reasons for an assessed consequence; it is not a necessary deductive form for all value justification. -/ +def ValueProcedure {W : Type} (v : ValuePosition W) : Prop := + v.reasons ≠ [] ∧ JointAdoption v ∧ + (∀ w, Models v.starting w → v.limits w → + (∀ reason, reason ∈ v.reasons → reason w v.adopted) → v.consequence w) ∧ + (∀ w, v.limits w → v.relevantCriticism w → ∃ answer, v.response w = some answer ∧ answer ≠ "") +/- A facet carries its specific contents; several different facets can have the same conclusion. -/ +inductive Facet (W : Type) where + | empirical (records : List (Record W)) (scope conclusion uncertainty : Claim W) + | inferential (assumptions : Theory W) (conclusion : Claim W) + | value (position : ValuePosition W) +/- The claim referred to by each assessment facet is explicit. -/ +def Facet.claim {W : Type} : Facet W → Claim W + | .empirical _ _ p _ => p + | .inferential _ p => p + | .value v => v.commitment +/- These disclosed semantic adapters implement selected nature-specific checks; passing them does not establish all real empirical or value adequacy. -/ +def FacetDischarged {W : Type} : Facet W → Prop + | .empirical records scope p uncertainty => + (∃ w, Compatible records w ∧ scope w) ∧ + Supports records (fun w => scope w → p w) ∧ Supports records uncertainty + | .inferential assumptions p => Satisfiable assumptions ∧ Entails assumptions p + | .value v => ValueProcedure v +/- This model's semantic adapter identifies the actual assumptions, reason content and limit of a facet. -/ +def FacetArticulated {W : Type} (a : Articulation W) : Facet W → Prop + | .empirical records scope _ _ => + a.assumptions = singleton (Compatible records) ∧ a.reasons = [Compatible records] ∧ a.limits = scope + | .inferential assumptions _ => + a.assumptions = assumptions ∧ a.reasons = [Models assumptions] ∧ a.limits = (fun _ => True) + | .value v => a.assumptions = v.starting ∧ a.reasons = v.activeReasons ∧ a.limits = v.limits +/- A canonical articulation exposes this adapter; the source does not mandate this particular representation of grounds. -/ +def canonicalArticulation {W : Type} : Facet W → Articulation W + | .empirical records scope _ _ => + ⟨["recorded test outcomes", "observation conditions"], singleton (Compatible records), [Compatible records], scope⟩ + | .inferential assumptions _ => + ⟨["stated assumptions", "semantic consequence"], assumptions, [Models assumptions], fun _ => True⟩ + | .value v => + ⟨["adopted position", "reasons and consequences"], v.starting, v.activeReasons, v.limits⟩ +/- Canonical articulation is connected to the very facet whose grounds it identifies. -/ +theorem canonicalFacetArticulated {W : Type} (f : Facet W) : + FacetArticulated (canonicalArticulation f) f := by + cases f <;> exact ⟨rfl, rfl, rfl⟩ +/- A discharged facet has nonempty canonical reason articulation, including the value procedure's reason requirement. -/ +theorem canonicalArticulated {W : Type} (f : Facet W) (h : FacetDischarged f) : + Articulated (canonicalArticulation f) := by + cases f with + | empirical records scope p uncertainty => simp [Articulated, canonicalArticulation] + | inferential assumptions p => simp [Articulated, canonicalArticulation] + | value v => + refine ⟨by simp [canonicalArticulation], ?_⟩ + simpa [canonicalArticulation, ValuePosition.activeReasons] using h.1 +/- This model of the Grounds obligation binds each actual facet to its claim and articulation. Its disclosed FacetDischarged adapters do not replace all source-level assessment responsibilities or prove real adequacy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +def Grounds {W : Type} (claim : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := + facets ≠ [] ∧ (∀ facet, actualApplicable facet → facet ∈ facets) ∧ + ∀ facet, facet ∈ facets → facet.claim = claim ∧ Articulated (articulations facet) ∧ + FacetArticulated (articulations facet) facet ∧ FacetDischarged facet +/- The achievement obligation requires grounds for this very claim, without making observation a universal prerequisite. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +def AchievementAccountability {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (articulations : Facet W → Articulation W) + (actualApplicable : Facet W → Prop) (facets : List (Facet W)) : Prop := + Grounds achievement articulations actualApplicable facets +/- The concrete achievement claim refers to each transition's own before/after states. -/ +def transitionAchievement : Claim TransitionCase := + fun transition => Expanded (transitionBefore transition) (transitionAfter transition) +/- This observation inspects an actually constructed successor and its output under that transition's input condition. -/ +def transitionPerformanceRecord : Record TransitionCase := + ⟨fun transition => (transitionAfter transition).constructed.any + (fun operation => operation == .successor && decide (operation.run (transitionInput transition) = 1)), true⟩ +/- The positive report test reads its asserted operation, input and output; it does not verify their presence in the after-state. -/ +def transitionReportRecord : Record TransitionCase := + ⟨fun transition => + let report := transitionAnnouncement transition + report.reportedNewOperation == .successor && report.input == 0 && report.expectedOutput == 1, true⟩ +/- Only the genuine extension matches the operation/performance observation in this two-transition model. -/ +theorem transitionPerformanceCompatible : + ∀ transition, Compatible [transitionPerformanceRecord] transition ↔ transition = .extend := by + intro transition + constructor + · intro h + have observed := h transitionPerformanceRecord (List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl) + cases transition + · cases observed + · rfl + · intro h; cases h + intro record hr; have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr; subst record + rfl +/- A compatible performance observation establishes the same transition's report content and hence its represented expansion. -/ +theorem transitionSupported : Supports [transitionPerformanceRecord] transitionAchievement := by + intro transition compatible + have h := (transitionPerformanceCompatible transition).1 compatible + subst transition + have reportTrue : (transitionAnnouncement .extend).claim := by + simp [transitionAnnouncement, transitionAfter, transitionInput, + Announcement.claim, GeneratingSystem.report, generatingSystem, extendedState, baseState, Operation.run] + exact announcementClaimImpliesExpansion _ reportTrue +/- The actual scope is the shared input-zero condition, with no probabilistic inference introduced. -/ +def transitionFacet : Facet TransitionCase := + .empirical [transitionPerformanceRecord] (fun transition => transitionInput transition = 0) + transitionAchievement (fun _ => True) +/- The empirical assessment has a real compatible witness and supports this scoped achievement. -/ +theorem transitionFacetDischarged : FacetDischarged transitionFacet := by + refine ⟨⟨.extend, (transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl, rfl⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro transition compatible _; exact transitionSupported transition compatible + · intro _ _; trivial +/- Every applicable facet of this specified achievement has matching articulation and actual discharged evidence. -/ +theorem transitionAccountable : + AchievementAccountability transitionAchievement canonicalArticulation + (fun facet => facet = transitionFacet) [transitionFacet] := by + refine ⟨by simp, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro facet hf; subst facet; exact List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl + · intro facet hf; have hf' := List.mem_singleton.mp hf; subst facet + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated _ transitionFacetDischarged, + canonicalFacetArticulated _, transitionFacetDischarged⟩ +/- Both actual transitions issue the same positive report about their own identified state pair. -/ +theorem transitionReportCompatible (transition : TransitionCase) : + Compatible [transitionReportRecord] transition := by + intro record hr; have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr; subst record + rfl +/- Inflation is a concrete report-compatible counterworld, so the positive report alone does not support the same achievement claim. -/ +theorem transitionReportDoesNotSupport : + Compatible [transitionReportRecord] .inflate ∧ ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate ∧ + ¬ Supports [transitionReportRecord] transitionAchievement := by + have noExpansion : ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate := by + simp [transitionAchievement, transitionBefore, transitionAfter, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + exact ⟨transitionReportCompatible _, noExpansion, fun h => noExpansion (h _ (transitionReportCompatible _))⟩ +/- These concrete obligations, positive evidence and negative report case all refer to the same state-pair and input semantics. -/ +def ConcreteAchievementExample : Prop := + AchievementAccountability transitionAchievement canonicalArticulation + (fun facet => facet = transitionFacet) [transitionFacet] ∧ + Compatible [transitionPerformanceRecord] .extend ∧ + Supports [transitionPerformanceRecord] transitionAchievement ∧ transitionAchievement .extend ∧ + (Compatible [transitionReportRecord] .inflate ∧ ¬ transitionAchievement .inflate ∧ + ¬ Supports [transitionReportRecord] transitionAchievement) ∧ + (∀ transition, (transitionAnnouncement transition).before = transitionBefore transition ∧ + (transitionAnnouncement transition).after = transitionAfter transition ∧ + (transitionAnnouncement transition).input = transitionInput transition ∧ transitionInput transition = 0) +/- The concrete example jointly inhabits accountability, evidence compatibility, actual gain, and the report-only countermodel. -/ +theorem concreteAchievementExample : ConcreteAchievementExample := by + refine ⟨transitionAccountable, (transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl, transitionSupported, + transitionSupported .extend ((transitionPerformanceCompatible _).2 rfl), + transitionReportDoesNotSupport, ?_⟩ + intro transition; exact ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl⟩ +/- Semantic evidence yields truth only at a world that actually satisfies those evidence conditions. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2 sha256 6dade83f0b7fcc004bdb37b6726c15b31b06a377de4e86d506c9d2e67847029d +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem achievementNeedsSupport {W : Type} (achievement : Claim W) (records : List (Record W)) + (actual : W) (reliableHere : Compatible records actual) (support : Supports records achievement) : + achievement actual ∧ ConcreteAchievementExample := + ⟨support actual reliableHere, concreteAchievementExample⟩ +/- Weakening a conclusion preserves support; this makes no claim about weakening the evidence. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem supportWeakening {W : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p q : Claim W) + (support : Supports records p) (weaker : ∀ w, p w → q w) : Supports records q := + fun w hw => weaker w (support w hw) +/- Discarding the only informative observation loses support for the unchanged switch claim. -/ +theorem evidenceWeakeningCanLoseSupport : + Supports ([⟨id, true⟩] : List (Record Bool)) (fun w => w = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports ([] : List (Record Bool)) (fun w => w = true) := by + refine ⟨?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w hw; exact hw ⟨id,true⟩ (by simp) + · intro h; have bad := h false (by intro r hr; cases hr); cases bad +/- Restricting the quantified application domain preserves a supported universal conclusion. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction +organon.grounds#p1 sha256 4ee74dc8617388ee75d63b507176ecb73b8527758b648f7c588d3ae7f3445ec6 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem scopeRestriction {W X : Type} (records : List (Record W)) (p : W → X → Prop) + (wide narrow : X → Prop) (included : ∀ x, narrow x → wide x) + (support : Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, wide x → p w x)) : + Supports records (fun w => ∀ x, narrow x → p w x) := + fun w hw x hx => support w hw x (included x hx) +/- Actual applicability, rather than an optional classifier label, determines facet responsibility. -/ +def Duties {W : Type} (applicable : Facet W → Prop) : Prop := + ∀ f, applicable f → FacetDischarged f +def LabeledDuties {W : Type} (_labels : List String) (applicable : Facet W → Prop) : Prop := + Duties applicable +/- Combining applicable facets requires both sets of substantive duties. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem assessmentUnion {W : Type} (a b : Facet W → Prop) : + Duties (fun f => a f ∨ b f) ↔ Duties a ∧ Duties b := by + constructor + · intro h; exact ⟨fun f hf => h f (Or.inl hf), fun f hf => h f (Or.inr hf)⟩ + · rintro ⟨ha,hb⟩ f (hf|hf); exact ha f hf; exact hb f hf +/- Omitting or changing labels does not remove an applicable duty. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem labelsCannotWaive {W : Type} (xs ys : List String) (a : Facet W → Prop) : + LabeledDuties xs a ↔ LabeledDuties ys a := Iff.rfl +/- The observed switch is the outcome itself, not a record identifier. -/ +def switchRecord : Record Bool := ⟨id, true⟩ +theorem switchCompatible (w : Bool) : Compatible [switchRecord] w ↔ w = true := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h switchRecord (by simp) + · intro hw r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; exact hw +theorem switchSupported : Supports [switchRecord] (fun w : Bool => w = true) := + fun w hw => (switchCompatible w).1 hw +/- The candidate action has specific benefit and cost outcomes; its inactive alternative has neither. -/ +def optionBenefit (selected : Bool) : Nat := if selected then 4 else 0 +def optionCost (selected : Bool) : Nat := if selected then 3 else 0 +/- The report describes each option's actual cost and benefit; it does not itself assert which option ought to be selected. -/ +def optionReport (selected : Bool) : Prop := + optionCost selected ≤ 3 ∧ optionBenefit selected = (if selected then 4 else 0) +/- The on position connects its own selected option to that option's benefit/cost outcome. -/ +def switchPosition : ValuePosition Bool where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := id + outcome := fun _ option => (optionBenefit option, optionCost option) + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun _ option => optionCost option ≤ 3 + starting := singleton (fun w => w = true) + reasons := [fun _ option => optionReport option] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun w => w = false + response := fun w => if w then some "benefit exceeds cost within budget" else some "reconsider if the budget no longer permits this cost" +theorem switchValueProcedure : ValueProcedure switchPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [switchPosition], ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · refine ⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + · intro w _ _ allReasons + have evidence := allReasons (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) (List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl) + change optionReport true at evidence + have benefitAboveBudget : 3 < optionBenefit true := by rw [evidence.2]; decide + exact ⟨Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt evidence.1 benefitAboveBudget, evidence.1⟩ + · intro w _ _; cases w <;> simp [switchPosition] +/- Adopting the other option updates the adopted starting state too, so rejection cannot be blamed on an inconsistent start. -/ +def oppositePosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with adopted := false, starting := singleton (fun w => w = false) } +/- The alternative has a joint adoption witness but its actual zero benefit/cost fails the adopted strict-benefit objective. -/ +theorem oppositePositionRejected : JointAdoption oppositePosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure oppositePosition := by + have witness : JointAdoption oppositePosition := by + refine ⟨false, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + refine ⟨witness, ?_⟩ + intro h + have allReasons : ∀ reason, reason ∈ oppositePosition.reasons → reason false oppositePosition.adopted := by + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : Bool) (option : Bool) => optionReport option) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + exact ⟨by decide, rfl⟩ + have bad := h.2.2.1 false ((modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl) trivial allReasons + exact Nat.lt_irrefl 0 bad.1 +/- Contradictory starting assumptions and an impossible selected/adopted equality are separate inadmissible variants. -/ +def contradictoryStartingPosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with starting := singleton (fun _ => False) } +def impossibleAdoptionPosition : ValuePosition Bool := + { switchPosition with selected := fun _ => false } +/- The common-world witness rejects both contradiction and an impossible commitment instead of proving them vacuously. -/ +theorem inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected : + ¬ ValueProcedure contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure impossibleAdoptionPosition := by + constructor + · intro h; obtain ⟨w,hw,_,_,_⟩ := h.2.1 + exact (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hw + · intro h; obtain ⟨w,_,_,hw,_⟩ := h.2.1 + cases hw +/- Removing the reasons leaves only a position and assertion, which fails this value procedure. -/ +def unsupportedPosition : ValuePosition Bool := { switchPosition with reasons := [] } +def switchEmpirical : Facet Bool := + .empirical [switchRecord] (fun _ => True) (fun w => w = true) (fun _ => True) +theorem switchEmpiricalDischarged : FacetDischarged switchEmpirical := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (switchCompatible true).2 rfl, trivial⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w hw _; exact switchSupported w hw + · intro w _; trivial +/- A mixed empirical/value position has actual empirical evidence but still lacks its value-reason duty. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem mixedMissingResponsibility : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬ LabeledDuties [] (fun f : Facet Bool => f = switchEmpirical ∨ f = .value unsupportedPosition) := by + refine ⟨switchEmpiricalDischarged, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := (h (.value unsupportedPosition) (Or.inr rfl)).1 + exact bad rfl +/- A fully identified argument may still fail to entail the stated conclusion. -/ +def uninformativeArgument : Articulation Bool := + ⟨["switch state"], emptyTheory, [fun _ => True], fun _ => True⟩ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem articulationNotSupport : Articulated uninformativeArgument ∧ + ¬ Entails uninformativeArgument.assumptions (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by + exact ⟨⟨by simp [uninformativeArgument], by simp [uninformativeArgument]⟩, + consistentIncomplete.2.1⟩ +/- Identifiable but unrelated argument fields cannot replace the actual observation grounds under the connected adapter. -/ +theorem unrelatedArticulationRejected : + Articulated uninformativeArgument ∧ FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + ¬ FacetArticulated uninformativeArgument switchEmpirical := by + refine ⟨articulationNotSupport.1, switchEmpiricalDischarged, ?_⟩ + intro h + have relation := congrFun h.1 (Compatible [switchRecord]) + have bad : False := relation.mpr rfl + exact bad +/- Repetition of the same unrelated temperature observation leaves the switch state undetermined. -/ +def temperatureRecord : Record (Bool × Bool) := ⟨Prod.fst, true⟩ +theorem temperatureCompatible (b : Bool) : + Compatible [temperatureRecord, temperatureRecord] (true,b) := by + intro r hr + simp at hr + cases hr + rfl +/- The world identifies a selected action and its budget; the action costs three units. -/ +abbrev BudgetWorld := Bool × Nat +/- A real issued announcement asserts the selected action, but says nothing about affordability. -/ +def announcement : String := "activate" +def announcementPosition : ValuePosition BudgetWorld where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := Prod.fst + outcome := fun _ option => (optionBenefit option, optionCost option) + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun w option => optionCost option ≤ w.2 + starting := singleton (fun w => w.1 = true) + reasons := [fun _ option => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun w => w.2 < 3 + response := fun _ => some "reconsider the action when its cost exceeds budget" +/- The zero-budget counterworld satisfies the stated starts, adoption and all announced reasons jointly. -/ +theorem announcementHasJointAdoption : JointAdoption announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨(true,0), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := + List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl +/- A nonempty announcement remains true in a jointly admissible zero-budget world but cannot support the action's affordability. -/ +theorem announcementNotBudgetReason : + announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ announcementPosition.commitment (true,0) ∧ + (∀ reason, reason ∈ announcementPosition.reasons → reason (true,0) announcementPosition.adopted) ∧ + ¬ announcementPosition.consequence (true,0) ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [announcementPosition], rfl, ?_, (by intro h; cases h.2), ?_⟩ + · intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl + · intro h + have allReasons : ∀ reason, reason ∈ announcementPosition.reasons → reason (true,0) announcementPosition.adopted := by + intro reason hr + have hr' : reason = (fun (_ : BudgetWorld) (option : Bool) => announcement = (if option then "activate" else "disable")) := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + rfl + have bad := h.2.2.1 (true,0) ((modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl) trivial allReasons + cases bad.2 +/- A repeated actual selection observation contains no budget information. -/ +def actionRecord : Record BudgetWorld := ⟨Prod.fst, true⟩ +theorem actionCompatible (budget : Nat) : Compatible [actionRecord, actionRecord] (true,budget) := by + intro r hr; simp at hr; cases hr; rfl +/- Single and repeated irrelevant observations cannot establish the other outcome or the same action's budget adequacy. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem measurementRepeatNotSupport : + temperatureRecord.test (true,false) = true ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,false) ∧ + Compatible [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (true,true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [temperatureRecord,temperatureRecord] (fun w : Bool × Bool => w.2 = true) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,0) ∧ + Compatible [actionRecord,actionRecord] (true,3) ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ Supports [actionRecord,actionRecord] announcementPosition.consequence ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition := by + refine ⟨rfl, temperatureCompatible false, temperatureCompatible true, ?_, ?_, + actionCompatible 0, actionCompatible 3, ?_, ?_, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.2⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h (true,false) (by intro r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; rfl) + cases bad + · intro h; have bad := h (true,false) (temperatureCompatible false); cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (true,0) (by intro r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; rfl) + cases bad.2 + · intro h; have bad := h (true,0) (actionCompatible 0); cases bad.2 +/- Missing reason records fail a procedure; independently, a present announcement fails the explicit budget-support criterion. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem selfAssertionNotReason : + (unsupportedPosition.commitment true ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure unsupportedPosition) ∧ + (announcementPosition.reasons ≠ [] ∧ announcementPosition.commitment (true,0) ∧ + ¬ announcementPosition.consequence (true,0) ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure announcementPosition) ∧ + JointAdoption announcementPosition := + ⟨⟨rfl, fun h => h.1 rfl⟩, + ⟨announcementNotBudgetReason.1, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.1, + announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.1, announcementNotBudgetReason.2.2.2.2⟩, + announcementHasJointAdoption⟩ +/- The value procedure is satisfiable although the adopted starting commitment is not entailed by empty facts. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem valueWithoutSelfProof : ValueProcedure switchPosition ∧ + Satisfiable switchPosition.starting ∧ + ¬ Entails (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) switchPosition.commitment ∧ + (JointAdoption oppositePosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure oppositePosition) ∧ + (¬ ValueProcedure contradictoryStartingPosition ∧ ¬ ValueProcedure impossibleAdoptionPosition) := + ⟨switchValueProcedure, ⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, consistentIncomplete.2.1, + oppositePositionRejected, inadmissibleValuePositionsRejected⟩ +/- The world records the selected option and its actual benefit/cost outcomes. -/ +abbrev BenefitCostWorld := Bool × (Nat × Nat) +def measuredOutcome (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Nat × Nat := + if option then world.2 else (0,0) +def benefitReason (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Prop := + (measuredOutcome world option).1 = 4 +def costReason (world : BenefitCostWorld) (option : Bool) : Prop := + (measuredOutcome world option).2 ≤ 3 +/- Neither recorded benefit nor recorded cost alone establishes the selected option's joint consequence. -/ +def jointReasonPosition : ValuePosition BenefitCostWorld where + Position := Bool + Outcome := Nat × Nat + adopted := true + selected := Prod.fst + outcome := measuredOutcome + objective := fun result => result.2 < result.1 + constraints := fun world option => (measuredOutcome world option).2 ≤ 3 + starting := singleton (fun world => world.1 = true) + reasons := [benefitReason, costReason] + limits := fun _ => True + relevantCriticism := fun world => 3 < world.2.2 + response := fun _ => some "reassess the option when its cost exceeds the budget" +/- These two content constraints jointly establish the consequence in a nonempty adopted world. -/ +theorem jointReasonProcedure : ValueProcedure jointReasonPosition := by + refine ⟨by simp [jointReasonPosition], ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · refine ⟨(true,(4,3)), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, ?_⟩ + intro reason hr + change reason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason] at hr + rcases List.mem_cons.mp hr with hr | hr + · subst reason; rfl + · have hr' := List.mem_singleton.mp hr + subst reason + change 3 ≤ 3; exact Nat.le_refl 3 + · intro world _ _ reasons + have benefit := reasons benefitReason (by change benefitReason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason]; simp) + have cost := reasons costReason (by change costReason ∈ [benefitReason,costReason]; simp) + change (measuredOutcome world true).1 = 4 at benefit + change (measuredOutcome world true).2 ≤ 3 at cost + refine ⟨?_, cost⟩ + have bigger : 3 < (measuredOutcome world true).1 := by rw [benefit]; decide + exact Nat.lt_of_le_of_lt cost bigger + · intro world _ _ + exact ⟨"reassess the option when its cost exceeds the budget", rfl, by decide⟩ +/- Each separate reason has a concrete same-start/limit/adoption counterworld; their conjunction is sufficient. -/ +def JointReasonsExample : Prop := + ValueProcedure jointReasonPosition ∧ + (Models jointReasonPosition.starting (true,(4,5)) ∧ jointReasonPosition.limits (true,(4,5)) ∧ + jointReasonPosition.commitment (true,(4,5)) ∧ benefitReason (true,(4,5)) true ∧ + ¬ jointReasonPosition.consequence (true,(4,5))) ∧ + (Models jointReasonPosition.starting (true,(0,3)) ∧ jointReasonPosition.limits (true,(0,3)) ∧ + jointReasonPosition.commitment (true,(0,3)) ∧ costReason (true,(0,3)) true ∧ + ¬ jointReasonPosition.consequence (true,(0,3))) +theorem jointReasonsExample : JointReasonsExample := by + refine ⟨jointReasonProcedure, + ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, rfl, ?_⟩, + ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial, rfl, Nat.le_refl 3, ?_⟩⟩ + · intro h; have bad : 5 ≤ 3 := h.2; omega + · intro h; have bad : 3 < 0 := h.1; omega +/- Empirical observations, semantic inference and criticism-responsive reasons coexist without a scalar score. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem heterogeneousReasons : + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.inferential (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) (fun w => w = true)) ∧ + FacetDischarged (Facet.value switchPosition) ∧ JointReasonsExample := by + refine ⟨switchEmpiricalDischarged, ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩, switchValueProcedure, jointReasonsExample⟩ + intro w hw; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 hw + +/- This local observation checks the actual output on input zero. -/ +def zeroRecord : Record (Nat → Bool) := ⟨fun f => f 0, true⟩ +def localGenerator (seed : Nat) : Nat → Bool := fun n => n == seed +/- All outputs being true is a stronger, explicitly quantified capability claim. -/ +def allTrue : Claim (Nat → Bool) := fun f => ∀ n, f n = true +theorem zeroCompatible (f : Nat → Bool) : Compatible [zeroRecord] f ↔ f 0 = true := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h zeroRecord (by simp) + · intro hf r hr; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr; cases hr; exact hf +/- A generating subject owns an earlier predicate and a seed used to revise that actual predicate. -/ +structure GeneratingProcess where + owner : Nat + prior : Nat → Bool + generateSeed : Nat +/- The revision preserves prior successes and adds the seed-selected case through the actual generator. -/ +def GeneratingProcess.outputRevision (process : GeneratingProcess) : Nat → Bool := + fun input => process.prior input || localGenerator process.generateSeed input +/- A produced revision retains its producer and exact old/new objects. -/ +structure ProducedRevision where + producer : Nat + before : Nat → Bool + after : Nat → Bool +/- The subject itself constructs the owned before/after revision object. -/ +def GeneratingProcess.produce (process : GeneratingProcess) : ProducedRevision := + ⟨process.owner, process.prior, process.outputRevision⟩ +def sampleGeneratingProcess : GeneratingProcess := ⟨17, fun _ => false, 0⟩ +/- This same-owner revision actually changes input zero, while its produced predicate still fails at input one. -/ +def OwnedRevisionExample : Prop := + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.producer = sampleGeneratingProcess.owner ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.before = sampleGeneratingProcess.prior ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after = sampleGeneratingProcess.outputRevision ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.before 0 = false ∧ sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after 0 = true ∧ + sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after 1 = false ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue +/- Actual producer/old/new links and the compatible failing revision witness the insufficiency of self-origin. -/ +theorem ownedRevisionExample : OwnedRevisionExample := by + refine ⟨rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,rfl,(zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h sampleGeneratingProcess.produce.after ((zeroCompatible _).2 rfl) 1 + cases bad +/- The generator's own sample succeeds, but its generated revision has a concrete unsupported global claim. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem selfOriginDoesNotSupport : + localGenerator 0 0 = true ∧ localGenerator 0 1 = false ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue ∧ OwnedRevisionExample := by + refine ⟨rfl, rfl, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, ?_, ownedRevisionExample⟩ + intro h + have bad := h (localGenerator 0) ((zeroCompatible _).2 rfl) 1 + cases bad +/- A proper local observation allows both a universally successful and a failing extension. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem localNotUniversal : + (∃ outside : Nat, outside ≠ 0) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (fun _ => true) ∧ + Compatible [zeroRecord] (localGenerator 0) ∧ + allTrue (fun _ => true) ∧ ¬ allTrue (localGenerator 0) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := by + refine ⟨⟨1, by decide⟩, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl, + (fun _ => rfl), ?_, selfOriginDoesNotSupport.2.2.2.1⟩ + intro h; have bad := h 1; cases bad +/- Two implementations agree on the actual observed input and differ on a specified relevant omitted input. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem hiddenDifference : + (∀ n : Nat, n = 0 → (fun _ : Nat => true) n = localGenerator 0 n) ∧ + (fun _ : Nat => true) 1 ≠ localGenerator 0 1 := by + refine ⟨?_, by decide⟩ + intro n hn; cases hn; rfl +/- One observation supplies only its actual input-specific consequence, without repetition. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem singleObservation : [zeroRecord].length = 1 ∧ + (∃ f, Compatible [zeroRecord] f) ∧ + Supports [zeroRecord] (fun f => f 0 = true) ∧ + ¬ Supports [zeroRecord] allTrue := + ⟨rfl, ⟨localGenerator 0, (zeroCompatible _).2 rfl⟩, + (fun f hf => (zeroCompatible f).1 hf), selfOriginDoesNotSupport.2.2.2.1⟩ +/- This inferential assessment derives a successor value from its explicit numeric premise without observation. -/ +def arithmeticFacet : Facet Nat := .inferential (singleton (fun n => n = 2)) (fun n => n + 1 = 3) +def usesObservation {W : Type} : Facet W → Bool + | .empirical _ _ _ _ => true + | _ => false +/- An actual valid inferential assessment refutes a mandatory measurement/repetition/framework chain. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem noUniversalChain : FacetDischarged arithmeticFacet ∧ usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false := by + refine ⟨⟨⟨2, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩, rfl⟩ + intro n hn + have premise := (modelsSingleton (fun x : Nat => x = 2) n).1 hn + change n + 1 = 3 + rw [premise] +/- A trial has a reproducible setting, an actual outcome and a separately recorded outcome. -/ +structure Trial where + setting : Nat + actualOutcome : Nat + recordedOutcome : Nat +/- Verifying a record, reproducing settings and retaining a conclusion are separate predicates. -/ +def Verified (t : Trial) : Prop := t.recordedOutcome = t.actualOutcome +def Reproduced (a b : Trial) : Prop := a.setting = b.setting +def Bounded (t : Trial) : Prop := t.actualOutcome ≤ 2 +/- Same-setting possible trials can differ while preserving the chosen bound; no probability semantics is claimed. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem variableOutcomesStableBound : + let a : Trial := ⟨0,1,1⟩ + let b : Trial := ⟨0,2,2⟩ + Reproduced a b ∧ a.actualOutcome ≠ b.actualOutcome ∧ Bounded a ∧ Bounded b := by + simp [Reproduced, Bounded] +/- Concrete records distinguish record accuracy, condition reproduction and conclusion stability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability +organon.grounds.scope#p1 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p2 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +organon.grounds.scope#p3 sha256 4a0e93c7834e4ef62f129ee4621cf7bf1c93b64d86f9f145d1592adcf9fb6693 +-/ +theorem verificationReproductionStability : + (Verified ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Verified ⟨1,1,1⟩ ∧ ¬ Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨1,1,1⟩) ∧ + (Reproduced ⟨0,1,1⟩ ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,3,2⟩ ∧ ¬ Bounded ⟨0,3,2⟩) ∧ + (Bounded ⟨0,1,1⟩ ∧ Bounded ⟨0,2,0⟩ ∧ ¬ Verified ⟨0,2,0⟩) := by + simp [Verified, Reproduced, Bounded] +/- Explanation certificates are executable syntax for this same arithmetic process. -/ +inductive Program where + | doubleInput + | constant (value : Nat) +def Program.eval : Program → Nat → Nat + | .doubleInput, n => n + n + | .constant value, _ => value +/- A process exposes outputs and an explanation response, whose certificate can be checked against those outputs. -/ +structure Process where + output : Nat → Nat + explanation : Option Program +/- The output-only application contract checks every relevant input. -/ +def OutputContract (p : Process) : Prop := ∀ n, p.output n = n + n +/- The explanation application contract requires a provided certificate faithful to this very process. -/ +def ExplanationContract (p : Process) : Prop := + ∃ program, p.explanation = some program ∧ ∀ n, program.eval n = p.output n +/- This process produces doubled values but returns no explanatory certificate. -/ +def outputOnlyProcess : Process := ⟨fun n => n + n, none⟩ +def explainedProcess : Process := ⟨fun n => n + n, some .doubleInput⟩ +/- Object scope fixes the very process whose contract is assessed; contract inputs themselves still range over all naturals. -/ +def processScope (assessed : Process) : Theory Process := + singleton (fun candidate => candidate = assessed) +/- This inferential facet checks an explicit contract under exact process-identity assumptions. -/ +def processContractFacet (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) : Facet Process := + .inferential (processScope assessed) contract +/- The scope's compatible interpretations are exactly this assessed process, not an unrelated substitute. -/ +theorem processScopeModels (assessed candidate : Process) : + Models (processScope assessed) candidate ↔ candidate = assessed := + modelsSingleton (fun process => process = assessed) candidate +/- A concrete contract proof supplies the facet's consequence for its scoped object. -/ +theorem processContractDischarged (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) (proof : contract assessed) : + FacetDischarged (processContractFacet assessed contract) := by + refine ⟨⟨assessed,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + intro candidate hc + have same := (processScopeModels _ _).1 hc + subst candidate + exact proof +/- Scoped capability grounds include exact claim, object-specific assumptions, canonical articulation and actual assessment. -/ +def ProcessGrounds (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) : Prop := + Grounds contract canonicalArticulation (fun facet => facet = processContractFacet assessed contract) + [processContractFacet assessed contract] +theorem processGrounds (assessed : Process) (contract : Claim Process) (proof : contract assessed) : + ProcessGrounds assessed contract := by + have discharged := processContractDischarged assessed contract proof + refine ⟨by simp, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro facet hf; subst facet; exact List.mem_singleton.mpr rfl + · intro facet hf; have hf' := List.mem_singleton.mp hf; subst facet + exact ⟨rfl,canonicalArticulated _ discharged,canonicalFacetArticulated _,discharged⟩ +/- Universal output correctness here comes from the concrete program definition, not from an assumed capability label. -/ +theorem outputCorrectByEvaluation : OutputContract outputOnlyProcess := fun _ => rfl +/- This same process actually returns no explanation certificate. -/ +theorem outputOnlyNoExplanation : ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess := by + rintro ⟨program,h,_⟩; cases h +/- The full application contract requires outputs and an explanation of that same process. -/ +def FullProcessContract (assessed : Process) : Prop := OutputContract assessed ∧ ExplanationContract assessed +/- Output-only grounds have the assessed process itself as a counterworld to the stronger contract. -/ +def OutputContractEvidence : Prop := + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + Models (processScope outputOnlyProcess) outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬ Entails (processScope outputOnlyProcess) FullProcessContract +/- Existing output evidence does not supply the absent explanation for the same object and scope. -/ +theorem outputContractEvidence : OutputContractEvidence := by + refine ⟨processGrounds _ _ outputCorrectByEvaluation, (processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl, ?_⟩ + intro stronger + exact outputOnlyNoExplanation (stronger outputOnlyProcess ((processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl)).2 +/- Both actual application contracts have grounds and explicit object scopes; neither scope is empty. -/ +def ScopedApplicationEvidence : Prop := + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + ProcessGrounds explainedProcess FullProcessContract ∧ + (∀ candidate, Models (processScope outputOnlyProcess) candidate ↔ candidate = outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + (∀ candidate, Models (processScope explainedProcess) candidate ↔ candidate = explainedProcess) ∧ + Satisfiable (processScope outputOnlyProcess) ∧ Satisfiable (processScope explainedProcess) +/- Concrete evaluation and a faithful double-input certificate establish the two differently scoped contracts. -/ +theorem scopedApplicationEvidence : ScopedApplicationEvidence := by + refine ⟨processGrounds _ _ outputCorrectByEvaluation, processGrounds _ _ ?_, + processScopeModels _,processScopeModels _,⟨_,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨_,(processScopeModels _ _).2 rfl⟩⟩ + exact ⟨fun _ => rfl,⟨.doubleInput,rfl,fun _ => rfl⟩⟩ +/- Universal output correctness does not entail the explanation-requiring contract for the same process. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem outputNotExplanation : OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ OutputContractEvidence := + ⟨outputCorrectByEvaluation, outputOnlyNoExplanation, outputContractEvidence⟩ +/- Applications may use distinct contracts, and a faithful certificate can satisfy the stronger one. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem applicationContractsDiffer : + (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ¬ (OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess)) ∧ + (OutputContract explainedProcess ∧ ExplanationContract explainedProcess) ∧ + ScopedApplicationEvidence := + ⟨⟨outputCorrectByEvaluation, fun h => outputOnlyNoExplanation h.2⟩, + ⟨(fun _ => rfl), ⟨.doubleInput, rfl, fun _ => rfl⟩⟩, scopedApplicationEvidence⟩ +/- The assessor supplies a mathematical certificate; the process's own explanation response is unnecessary. -/ +structure ExternalCertificate (p : Process) where + assessorId : Nat + assessedId : Nat + distinctParticipants : assessorId ≠ assessedId + outputCorrect : ∀ n, p.output n = n + n +/- The external assessor 42 evaluates the specified process 7; the full output proof is constructed by evaluation. -/ +def externalOutputCertificate : ExternalCertificate outputOnlyProcess := + ⟨42,7,by decide,fun _ => rfl⟩ +/- An external certificate establishes the output contract without producing an internal explanation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment +organon.grounds.capabilities#p1 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +organon.grounds.capabilities#p2 sha256 7249f6f2ef327baaa72349cae53b9245f23a34436356dd05f3c6005cab35e8f0 +-/ +theorem externalAssessment : + (∃ certificate : ExternalCertificate outputOnlyProcess, + certificate.assessorId = 42 ∧ certificate.assessedId = 7 ∧ + certificate.assessorId ≠ certificate.assessedId ∧ OutputContract outputOnlyProcess) ∧ + ProcessGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract ∧ + ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess := + ⟨⟨externalOutputCertificate,rfl,rfl,externalOutputCertificate.distinctParticipants, + externalOutputCertificate.outputCorrect⟩, + processGrounds outputOnlyProcess OutputContract externalOutputCertificate.outputCorrect, + outputOnlyNoExplanation⟩ +/- This argument records concepts and actual premises for a semantic inference, separately from executable tests. -/ +def arithmeticArticulation : Articulation Nat := canonicalArticulation arithmeticFacet +/- A reasoned inferential assessment needs no observation method, while applicable empirical assessment retains observations. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment +organon.relationships.terms#p1 sha256 0d22f818e4466a5ab4272607ac0ab26997270cf05c64ce9ac547e866068907d1 +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem nonExecutableAssessment : + Grounds (fun n : Nat => n + 1 = 3) canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = arithmeticFacet) [arithmeticFacet] ∧ + usesObservation arithmeticFacet = false ∧ + FacetDischarged switchEmpirical ∧ usesObservation switchEmpirical = true := by + refine ⟨⟨by simp, (by intro f hf; cases hf; simp), ?_⟩, rfl, switchEmpiricalDischarged, rfl⟩ + intro f hf; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hf; cases hf + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated _ noUniversalChain.1, canonicalFacetArticulated _, noUniversalChain.1⟩ + +end CoreReader.Evidence diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.olean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.olean new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..4d5f05a6e959744856caeb5c08bde36f8d5c1005 GIT binary patch literal 1052112 zcmb4scR*A}_x1t{t{poj8rK>uiP*6QMGeNn+OZ^pun0<7DT+0#v0%rG%A+pH|NfImSKr`f8YJX$Gy*))27e8yF`YW10oz98h_fT(Web` z@4q}7H1}-KbZ|qnM?j;&!Hqqd1Ozv35@2o;*eoEpVdLfvf;@wp3^tpa>U8xgjW_9Z ziN#xKNE#h;7kB6S_TQ{Cw-?2aR zr{KO&ic9?WIr0un<~Y+BEnF@Gcqb#;MCVg3~N2izZ zCN=1_ZhgBMT0fP_fF-hk+LJ(ab>ceK3x`d?D>)BI_N<=1tRa}a7$=ZXkb8?%_|w7 z&V~B{I~tMFfO-n?(-}77ZZg z-~Dtm$oMNZO-Wu>_fR6~)$-2w(f;Reb$dN~;5o@Vw&#y)#!$IXR?K63LKW^jje2A+s2p zRXy-8iS?{lb*A#JF+DXmNDur0mgK@pzq1YXTHbh^&t`r5(#vmK*l}((_*H_-12KQ} z2?&d|?;L8Jo<(H-rdS6@VLkDTH)j5QW#;zX z{_qdu0TA^PE$Sf5>^nHx95o_9nR}?5>SreFt$KCUqlD$VZ1s%!3|NT@iYp)@A~II2 zhr&f0^a+Umg1U3tAUV5BiTwIKipo5+-5!ziq;?B$lA%0cJ_BN267xE(k2F=Pp9!pI z#h7gC&Nt_5;}^z#Ali>uxA>~_Z7P?~gg+gIjjJ|2)20XU0YBtm!o^S}##RcqhuLBd zi0Kv?(^Ix}mdGEkv6zgvgj4dlTCEmsAR&qu;}j6{%b@7ca7+GSORFD$)?;OCyP$r= z&<%^CpbzDN$m9FQYqX;b);Hl%#-5jh-vvM);szrA5dl%50fR+Lij4`33^zxMC5`yh zPPBo%C5T#2#^N&mfUgJtcG79H5&BWTK-5?J*qBhWtZprCjQ>{Fb2F>%>UG21H9yG? z#yRxY{Q*w1vn&-4!w&it5dAACGFJHADZ&yPL!#P6`moN+W_$a`MPJOhH6nuqh)3Sg zZf<_-b+ONh7g{ws{6~LoE2fRW*f23|{Cl4KO2|B|FYjCW;q^m*l0DLg_6xL)gTwP? zHu5W;%O^8dTXMI^=<3IFpa=B_)E2IS6s;{XIyzM30=>3iiy{4}haBkNwtB;+*nhf1 zKiVA-?T^N>n1G19B#Q!So=qiX+*_)gJLwWxekk;zzJRE==+Mz--{3*f7Q20jmGvYs z?teXD(l@UcX>$eT5&aAZKSh7j6gD8kd};CWyqClJyp0b&ZZxIdw!4o%pYu%GM$g(u;Wki231ja|A6LX>+2CxKgpIH<$H} zIn{H>_~EU!`GI(kQZf$o!@w^OB(L{+qNRs;jJH_-Y_tsP{rO|VPO?C}h09~T8(7uq zc5|;T3%spn!h)E?xt6x`+^@Kd5J{H*dAPal3Byn;K7XB40qP&&BCUgxpl~Z2X>aHkJLFRB6}C zHl2t3g*dUE10vpkThOR^b1f_5tZ~)*Z}&#J7ynD2IO7o&!5bbD7MGeAf7Tatb?&wY zpZ)$N@f0`Ktw8uW+8iZzkl_~5b;TG?()sH(h4uY0X!}!V$D1v|XYqZkCsqY)`?E&p z+S)Ri?4h247=O)imau?`{3}TEAN|`{PUhpbL(OaLm)~AZ_DCP*10d#oZRNmqrRLSb zdd!y}9-TGUU0b>lpUC$y&jp>Ss?hR$6&dg zd=GwCp#O*qi1AnqzhdctW4rvPf~sEk@-iO>pOkQ2UT?+?(nWq^{sAH{QRZk1E&WLj z7wJR4v9i8ZAFlhn0yEIn0j-k2K!%Tht#~_o4FG zf1=+xXZNb}`=iaTNI&_DaS^B`TyU1C(8wqf5*O*gJm675#(gNO`_wPX`XzzS;`1of zpYxN1ta=lRr-8@$4*clw)UqwZG-xF8|CKkf-wzcVn*wB-{qx{5Ln%i9-?TjtcY4)LT1?G}iB9UdU2 zGhU*S9(OM9!)WYw^p)@Z=nJr8;rnP8<`cpi|# zdi~95S+mmLYWsLCE<1axOHN$$W^%iYu!neni0ktx+Um#+3hBXoXZ%3sC;03SBR^aB zL>rzdKNvTGSbx&EZGS+g>I-3gE??fXZVv4+6@Fn}0%Cl&?Jx3`jpH+kr#R5wfM|DtqIXC02?puGzBiHe{CFs%>Du*w)Q26+ z2Ut%}ZTL~wQmZQrgB|oEAo`Qo-p7Q5o5g1J-{(nPW$E{j7pHfO9n(}RMt-9_5bG1U zuFb!vRP$hBeIJyXR^i~#5q|LB%J(rIO#N|LNb_Ekv~-d^%tJtoW7__Rl!!~sQyS|# zKCEBoalKAH1)t6LG2a-nBOA^NUOo`KiT8n6uNrPwepRjA;abF#A85xwv}fg9JAd$^ zoEpE+M>3xwaj%!Tz8Dw+y=cckv}f#BY5XTyx=0_^UrDSl-q77=MeFgY;IV$d{>N}* zTCvNI8lNPd;=q0ch@spdx-%v-F9x#rc2^69^qWw z{fpb3j?MaG6P2g9-RM8!0%`@tXSu%fjR+gnEwY2%npgG9V3cvk|2*y6ulL+fCS9Z# zaRPBZplz6f+U7-{f9XiYwYV^D`?LP+kIL_Le6~qDe%0dUaU1>HQ1qdGRjt3Z`X>7r zKY+GzM2y&-g5qp;&~CEWj*qXYbhEX;+j#7o(f-qyL|h6lT=Mp&-7CjFaPuN{td*FpYRKa{yf+mEZ$fkDVYz9XYs5ry=5mu>1jVNA)fT0 zy#mn>wf)=w;rUVq>n&_;`}g`Ex@h|((u?s7h;dEZSM#9>=0LSwxL1>L*Is4ZV_J9a zCgQNQS3Xy&9eOpZM|k>j@EC6}AJ=aFlUMe*HXeu*;~Ws{wit8%@c{Lf%6=T(e(#Gf z%1-^!dP^IA1fK85w8oz))jVb}Y$%4LDa ze2?wNk0s3G&Uw#>7t z&--1O34K_{12OK#iic&Q<%{LBSUa?h8WKxS8mN%C)OxV8-k}-k9}Rl6?jz#KPpm_L znBV0*Y=2TfrSj{|WW7aNFR9j`akiF!(u;V3XfIN4{*|oir$z@Bp$$ z`Y;~=F;0eu#+ie zS*&;Z_ox2YGWbIu=*2h%#CRp=3zCxg#JK8NOUD1j(1>Ceo%X*Vp5n*241_*$u14?e zkeH7ALA$lGo+4Xn7fyfSY+HXAHA#|{R~5#*^A3|aN^4N!A)Q_ItMR6@{yM(p<0_3F zexKBkpO_bcm>(k|BRa&H17o$vKW(GM;xyXUQdPa~AItb3)*3l3HmF2%(o4KQ-^ck= z(d<7fo-5a*h5Xs1$AFXqi8*1z7=e)gUIJDw9y@nF3U zL_f)!@Bhd7H|rf%_{oe-bO{-lj8A>3LO#}(LT}~ z{Vxv_?c%by%Y3dMwybL3PfND3w~u-J*!t@Oz2yiALBXpM-Pq+uW5Gd{|eQlFbT(CQ0@Gm_>?*_UcArrcjJnGJZ^R=oAguM z7^i?(KLmya*j}h0JsGSghq2?B(}Eey6jZ4R7~%c(b+eR^ll?)#*Rt0%`|E;&W(3Ku|bMN8)r{KAqur_o924hnfS` z$GMsv`0H9v+S_oeS>MqM!uyeK@&oH6tWzFF?;l&CQHLwUlOLE@f#|R8VuOa5WBNu$ zh2?crH9v`LuXshrhg&L7)Yg-v5A!Mz;}6cSqr{65G3`cmpnY@xQ+??#;>m{o8#l@& z#Mk~3@nC<2{qwB(t^Te!@N+F*vX6NUi1sI5;|Y!7zDseS{fB%a^R}^e(|4ck{eD04 zf^`BA@rc8sz$kN!S$Xbiw@b|*M+)oz^U#DXBl-{i3~{*fe2@9)&%(!-@0vaRAb2b9 ztI@8z9w^guevdAG;IXd9J~O;gxsl^8>1x1#)FTk%uicbP;#xaF-YuWXe9Y=OC(EVr zu6XD(Xp%Y|5c&0$?`3GL+TPMw&+M?UPP>i`olXK;-ue6k?eV8wl@^W-ou{3DQ2k;3 z2*f@pZ+(&X4h8AMxvP79>G#wt55^5@d-pQz`SE?^F=D>kfNr%a&mo@dp?-m=XYn4v z|5rUHvYpwpTFq{~wY|2UA^)(>$2fiRUh^JLwl&qvk$pUm0V2QRB?j%)UGfu`nqM~$ z8SkTuzI(RJX&*o`#AE-9{t@v-z1;&py`ptPEnmFvfImO|Hoe~TcF%472YCk~|JvzX z`_SmXkbtNm|ML7Snf)m-pyjQVRc>0zABqq00MTv&=$$P^55}on*3&I=p0Sb7RNHe2X2JlQ9+U&x#_!>S8cHov59XD4)-&6CPt?>} zeQoojiQi{M9(}Vv+U0Td(GAi;aiczgh(B5!L&f010UIR0VK0a6Jx;2+u0?mB)6j?d z0HR*_{jebWeu)0;)llZacXONBM{0edZA-{M%!feCi{g24Y(SW*jq}0J>l0XC$h!{H}_=VT6^U0L1eMsb{`}c-nqZ9a8cTIYb5a-B(A1o0*Uzxht~kQYDJyQ$mNN@t>zH$xxV7ZB|v!1lC9`i1poGV7Vs z`HaJBSpELBO%AY}&A0_e@L5_)X3~%-iR% zMVlX}{xD7fG0&R$yGZOT z&AkJNr+mOqAp8~k9lKSNj348Te-jyh#-rlpk^ z3=dEq`$2qPPNl}o-&@OF5f-*a%WN7{Dyi1;yg+jhx2xx zQf&?>t6!950dEZI+g>?@2sJX8F9;Kpfq5uB8 zyIPImj*YeTs@A@FK1KUJGx@v2DJOP~B>j{()C&;nh-h;Ry+o)*LV9p+>(yN5=gF^s zRekdID=pom2m2f#`mdNTV#BrXi18*tXe52uC&aV99us?3Ji700BQi)l)*Fbc$I975 z^i!YjApXDXiS=c)s1xz_dVYHt2XfionZvKHPac-E81@h!>^)hzaNf*-%$?w|{zE-9 z%1yXFH@;gl_=9r@Ao_c>_EngFe=C#XM7xV`A@kbEeb44^E|qHsz37iX^h>eb6W{ML z7g(Pljx5$!=Jc*ZwK^}i)f4mpp)ZymOWS>`K=sd~rS$JR=O%-nEbrlnyrBJ|ef?hh zSmlRb9M#U3sGc;#LKujCDaVx#_!idx?3YPw|7p2HCn^tpZrkr6Uf3@)y3e;yH?<6a zf7sVzU-aFR4!WP`uJ{T(+8N4kxqD*h!;IN^^8@!Ew2MZ4i)`-DBWNj=r}!|w0nv|m zw$k*FEM1gO9nZ7YR$Si?=2d-nZm2ellRlhd0#Q$VqC#J^%zt>mdeM$DSZ~?pPxnnb z*isumNiW7LAkNX%=iC4FzN&j`>2I%3ZvJ|>Me-kr2lF}3!{)WNlxmk2sV(owZWR&~ z7f^e^AwK7gn_^}cUoiT&Q&YA5C9(ao57zihy1IEe>C|{W--P{MW0o(C2x)f=yoKLK z#(v^&r)K?zy1RA-kA98kS>?tWcLvV2+y;;KjrP-|*Mur(zxz{b{}dnU9f_pEW9Xla?0Jhk6I1{`Ka@MrwA!CF;x>Utze3)6FAtA) zyx4azc=TKF&zxqwv$oiy^%wFN`2-@bbbesAD1$rui}@sz{T-1SoHV?l=l_=;?G^2@{Ij1Htr&Q<40scdM>vN#f3JSu9m8s9+ii*y z>p&ppV|gws`x@z@OYL8-ZDl;=ONQ+lQt`xj;z=LI3n0dgpwMWsJ_w94X$#pK}4Hde7482$%0I|*w6a!qo#jBm4sjP2n8UGKxrhGb-^lA2RZou!4 zJRh=bz`IKi$AQQEk8z@z$Btzs2N@H=qu#JD8JY8TMB0!XTYJso_Y84vF)}E0-n-2= z-=KVIQJFuq=WY7dH;dGtr1?jAM4UjxEBDj%E(d9nmzuxic2e&)kG-E&oHut=j9K<-;EZptEY-U#Cp?N z@5sq@eCrmjTZd$b$NCxl<-+jau8g`CHWNJhBkHx;;GfEPG);5_?^a9ti*c^+tC&S8 zH640^Pvz(A;75M6)l#GNQ*HfDaUowoNhNTm@qNA0@xaO=4OeVaKZjx5q+F ze%$)_Q*GQLJ=hlkFBYizj?$rBmvTk`46Zqzy!zVJNz>qnmR3htgk#f%J|)KzA;Ri z7Q2un$R5@i*dOG^Wsm!!e~&og$sXD@5bZmfzIY>EkcbgKMqu}K-h6hG*=}m5G26Ok zj0%KZtS2#U#VuPmze(nXMmCUh$ol-M)NXvR`K(W1 z4{@TMr*2xdtnSR0uVD}49}w*szXL*YxX2#Xbp{{lf9eIZ=bjgT^d}keAMF^3{N#;y zwyy=^>pJ=J;>UV(KU>=Uvk4cp_Dptho&>wiZ%0?y>g1=zNp{g5foPZVnPvVJx|+8P zw%2dzxRw24nr@{yG@jSTSdUbE_H68=9hXlbPMpI6wS|Nr&BF(2Z3ueOxF30SlKJX4 z|MH@7=UY629<*y9+PCJHZEnXM^9{UB< z-^KG4%P!A(Jr_LI(I|iM{@z8SuEyRYp8Q3B29_a0T(J?+^4soWN5N0RB_aM*+m*31 z*LTazi)ZSLyFo&v7ySVU{l5Rl_l)CM@2E0MZ~H_|Jqo?(zd-b3K7ouTIb5or8LaPv zfhSY0ZJ+TS$&jBocL3u2A+I0*+Y>lxLDg^UBJ`=4}7XOQ9eAABgc(wm0uc?YX~nSJoT%_bk@8Bj}y`RsWvHNQB}+d%-yR zN*____zmx_u!sH&L_gNDWShea?rSkWn!3t7jjmey#LKz;v~-YN^aI#kT=?zO-VJ=U za~P^8)H4w4kbtnTUQw}TEkdvI7GM3I+_hb)clPmP zzHCu`aLqGCJ8Jo+^5~D?M+g5|;fEV5+>syn2ZW!ZKE#ld=O@M)OE>AyjvhZON+{|$ z0)8MLuybku+ugpCM)Uv=Kaj5-RUQqV()Z3v_<{KWi1xwf-RjqyWV_&XaxVMxs#&F9 zj=hMotpiaWh;~NntO#+=DE7m)FXd65@P2@guZ(Zm`1t{)BEMJ#|Ks>R#_a)POKsWN zZ}cnh*e_w+8gsCi`z2F{@4;J~rC#i(mP|U9VaN*T1Rncfthbh2xuWm)cvB1FsXbvn z0AgOi^M|~r(z0LR_k`R`((aOk@rydRpS}QlcrOh83^+8V*`~_7Z1suf%$OgSd~&Vi z`Nt=<;fDOdxC3+}#p1I6J*I+hBT4_zzmnO%ou$_P=uy6s78dEpIt7SvS@|8Q0z;76 zpA6k)+&e!RviHj~^_<8z(u;8bi19$K;|i#xVmei?KkI!Rd$COF$aHP}O+5Ms+W*ey zgGPQ|G1Rsn#eM_(_1Ar_#SL$Ca|-mMJoY1F9()qrD14}GKMx-L=k+H4IyZZqs*Lhj zci=g4rLZv$l`GXa1YXDIw6Omss7LSLTc^GOZ{l$V?V(lGRW9R(RUQQ%&zaFam%ePO z`=|9f6Y-SS()1s30g>M*@mzI;I85;t-`@%i42=$#V%ooI-cozW`r37G?dwh7ZV)PE z-m$*Kdw*~Kx%5HvS69w~$9@>+OK%)D*50xCKuzMwFN`NZj0b$|_}+2F)KmKNrsn41 z{Yy>LhDY)j{vb~S4;MfC(d{0);1Bkv@aIay3g0#v^6O~uSa)K7{w6BD#K~%xZ1W@X z21NVJn}6FW-#{U)GEW%4biJhCyOW1TG+ha?ALG}XT7xZ5jcb0U@{}j^FCf-G z1^2sobEVoZ;#mKcAF`%+->>dPdWpC4dkM%_>n>euPxJTH@3U7kM6^Sh2~CzKv>-0xFO73i{!mN#D)8-m$-JKDT|plh6I$ zmM!UjV9}C$RG$1sy8xnngoFl(-~W`~RLl3{Tx=KPt+9{v`=b?AuGPQYB8BvlUzoq) z*H^XMkLh{lXYJgH?4n%&kvF++6DK}O;z%c5YQ7TL?pO0i<~C~j!28(JnVyoc`|;>mBcDlEK+MD1`OE*u_xRlXWPELo?Z33+WTG#rrM%&}7EqgL1Q#12 zMs)hMD79PKP4cS$@vQ&amh0PAu5KAi`iXbt@fGvc*OqFQ54)GP&38%segXQ?^7x$K zJ59R|LwURhgmLA1r9z9$M?H_)c%IMDuHKnq`DetIHAnMgN4*$o- zMYXT%FYPa%@pV{(uX-hse&VqXG4gug`jW3orSEvQgm_{9`B3o>UBF~sXZv9N!04fu z`V$!O`x&Xc&Q0QTx?Dz6At|5Bn85owcOK`gjOmPSMWlQxqbr_AFzSj)K7~Xv z#CklLKc_QdeDy3Lp5QqG?-g)xWGwF28?jAKk>OyK7~_}v;Ee{a`^5$nxF z{%qjiBk*HPVbt;W{EdupjA@Knj2`?xcM>Ch=f}YBue&o^88aAj7=7?PZhYUGF`Lng zzbBl;n8s+RD)ZpZ7{ZvsXsE_{VvJ)Ob!oL@c3<9h~i{Mo|&Ae}$Ee#xzFHMzUNyV+LamqibWydoX4( z>YB*=Mn*5j1jZCbyoX?HD&@Tx{TZ>3v-0OmM)zh?K8`V+F`Lnc=Tpq9Y5W=UK^A}3 z@%v;(#t_C-#!N={7Sf&%5dDikr!l(nc{ui`R{osDsB6V}Vf143XG~$lI?=%I&G<7~ z8M7F5ZCD?p7o$HT){`mtY>@JX&m{UW#xW)`rZQsxXW;iGOc)pVa{^-uV+LamqgPvL zCy_Cm(a=ubcW3lr3}K9C%w%-;mhwJ~$&9-8^1hMLi_xFa%9zEd>%j7iA&l6^xOJ3# z2xB~B7NhQSF3%Xpn9i8Z=;bgkYpD~TmwX3}E!HC~~iRaJBj5&<1-B_N{#F&WBE|O2>&zX$w zzVdz|V=7}NV=kkQNy=d#8N#3A8L=PA=FeW;SubNMV) z@Vwi8nbxTrM}hxvLx*2Gx)yH zsa@TA_YL9y67QVDyeDJ3!G5D4OXV>h<6h6lIYza-#}H{Bl?H=7AH3x5ii|y6aB_M|8(C&r`Kh0UR^_F9=sS$jEIlqU3Cr)A$*@c3+^S_ z1`zVv0S5_*OXS1WZlt&qZuGa~2Q(o)g4bi+DRgRA=1=3avt#-o+Jhc(lns5e z7&#I5ol;rf2Fu1X_);+Sqd2~w$e6(xV=9*FfWc6jBKx*H`Z&utub+R>W8&d48%adv z@gDlz9OHr`kNp}GFMNLQ-wo;(ke3NnkKZt9XUWy;AuWm@U&eOyR=$rsH2%0Uj%f1v z5nol7uj3Xpt^I0)_PP-Hf!qM0Cx8s_rTUS@_Fk9*M}1NCSQv?r9<*~H^bPW2B?3r~ zAx!$=&e*Wz%67BAeyg1~lO8-r1Y$lKB))N?{b7+jb(%gC>#;Dtx^#VKnXHJ;Bu4ts zCxLkXW>CneAy7qrC2{#Q#*RCRocyO=*%>4wc*ktMFLY|xsk2Rd4&QRnj=lfOPP@oR zEk{&H&7*s`%)_gChciji7 zRycYQD|sL0k*CGkzw~tS(rBtD7yEh*VfpFRD}16aSg$Vj^%~Fe=EEx+IUA*3{7d@n z>ot|-GrHeB?ou$XF81}1&GOdZ{*M1r4=(og;5J<5V|w*HI;sctqIy98L;v()d6J`g zh~v)=NoOCybr&EZRn@?5}l+xICm~jGUDEQ=ST6UwV+0)`W46JOFAxm-nw$yTM`oE zl+Ev7N^R;-isgMrhcuRleY!97>67?=CgYi%-j}pOl6TJG`-rdSs}WhyA@IHPpzV)E zNj)~dJfdYD=F~Lj7Jk0>I@uyW{P;fnxc%)}?VUU3o#U8CzPGqmZUH|;dFMpt(VwPA zeUj+N?U?+;_zlFo7=xF=*iRFWqnWI){ImU)QVS2avLAX~O#XWGzxCNx;^-njQn{Rw zHDJPKV*@G)s1E`L(j% zD)Vb5AL!}Rm;KVG+WGzWhIvq}`JKr;@>lrofI<$6-?_{qt_3-*=ODinmp}7vu`)l0 z&mA7>tmGf-XCUgqH#lzvsK(*PdZzxhChTeEzP~9B$`8r|p(oN#kCn?OF*=5|s20?q zVJ7LJ@kHp-E+Bmn_Vwv3pUvpeX`7prl=Z6{A>%`TC_MSeK5pu2X9{qzjx@bPK?dP~0_H#EsUUKBW_H%e&?t_F{RX#oVv=iwQ_8c)^VE^dS zE9-?LSA?iPC&MW22Z`UGRQHwHY#;r@o#pPle%H+25Aqx9gj6o)#qw=itefTdFY7ft z_r`k7!t&&|$jy7ld2!AbL^5=V_-y?pjmuA*nf@T*&;-aL%8p29BRj~&Or)IlTb+q?OD9>njLZ|Ig@5ggFA}RkN{5gry z|M;9gmHg}R-U0L#Y326{iYYHxr)P5c!+mlVIvAw{@u_@2mvMj2rWTIwdAyPDyN#83 zdG^z(75Y3ruf0{4{Gqn>Go~bcq@7)m|9HLz{}QXOe;~DM@j1t_Uewz^AOBNYtvBpL z5?O9gx5AaN&!m3l$M?}MQ~7i1{E{!6I8N0b;>~2a&wt!IONqzXlkXeG$#@p*7`M-v z=E%tasB%B7H%sl?SOkA0Wm{DVo zeGERGdHinZ$Zxj3I2!Pz8S{?W%vTvcbveZ{q<_tT)EY_J*HS1BQ6<_1M1QAqChwRy zjiWdWU(0;CGZxdGt+!5hco7K@Z{qtnhw}7)R_AfbaN9g&VIJ=f*X?xihsa-@@jjOx z&jZOvx~7<{-Q@o?{dznf248>D*bxfvoWc50p95ER?FU)mpC0cu;a+3M;qBD&uGakR z;lNr;0AxjZXAkDlZ(pq$=B19OIc(p=a!&P+pI7z^dc1c5oh2Kz>7d$Au(QAGZG+yB zCHpCM_W#;kJX^JIVLpQ~yUzDhu^*xM@ty{BdRQx`sPxdNbDQPKHkrO&YCZKYu_y*A4q?Ko&9URp+?9OpJHdfWqirt|g_Y9!Zaq9dRs{I5z`@LT;OoFTyzn%SF9%sH&?OT}7U`!dj>k7_uH2W=Ne9*b+ z^XRLpeb;aD$A4u*-~N!*;%6T5m(un7TD70Uc1tkeAwbFh~LUo5eiFgLQ-ME`hAT_dY+6 zBc99*`GGRVNisiA&A;x5iuz_Z+i~#W`xw8c9PBf&@FC1&{60MI*~3qtx7!Xr zo_UPlM;DoHPr2Ns8uO0H%wzoS*U8^;wac9zD4!1dJpN424yZowl~*h9+00{HZn|MX zLfH*JX}J>dIT|L*xU>mH6e`yD?q{cB{Vr2^$`jUoK2 znD=M=`47vDqKbXImj?UWoZ5_1?I+pUpES$+Eo3SFG&}n*$KEfY+P5;F#n|)vJMP64 z`*`mJI`6k!eOI+_oSHxWtA{`73R$x6#XRC48-MwnYG22^KjWhy*L?k`4OAEoeTUA*+` z@-LwaX{`dAlp9gp(bj0iXIj77uMD0E{!dT;vR2if zZm0i&PwmfC{mIN{Gk$TvFdyqO8h7mTWtcAgeRTHaQ1wiRY*PKh5Bf~?Z=XN9PxbH4 z_S{*YA7coks)zP3R=!W=1^3?hNjnH8A#sWP+vcYJgz zr+aj%~EoO=KVky2M?(S{|bG!dGA@9YV+y-?A5pC25fJq?M%sD+6-Aw*pFPC7+UH{sio6N zmiR2@G4GWM-rw=@rAgY3mGtXo%JSMqNR+8`IjvdaIy1U+c|G2nbf6pJ^82!Uefd8v zuR5$>s#M)KUuTkx(Ch5Qdi@!vS8Z_9LE-WIBaZp|iFLyq^LRbptA*XI;mt5LQ(Vre zcKY8uGB#KBXEKlHnhX5ae5vSn&Sf6;aB}^~$xeCpofE;&lKJVkXyI_Z!b3mKSsFOD z@1W}U<8o*>S>4WhsQNvbk7FD^vH5ss)-Pgy@A+BVykkGggRR}CvYrN4&MqB&zS&f& z3Bl{L_`cAoT_dZ++n$GsexWPM_nUv8*-YmzKd9~0I9tY#cKXz%n8ktRxG34NjgOuz z-`_uUjU&quAHw(19{gW?HO5Kd5S>f@#4E5b%@1z7r zFP(Og{cJ9W`l=CkYOIsOr!#MuBjY`>^4vxje_5XLVdVCZ$oX_#H7v%Z~cSGZMKINvtjr|^C3vzDEY?=foOiMc4B!94a^5d*r#l`NKK0iVM>_F3I~ z|FWj>gVoW@JGy==^MLs#c%{RmsY^O*V?O!k!93=h6#-uy?OeF|Qs_4^kNIZNgW?nG ztoHi_`Yp`k`=37No|ilA*WwiMlqak;fH?2;Q69jnc}ih@-oLEf`^CXTZQd5VK9ld` z`FqOe#{$R(U4nPcWgg?zM;9+Qa`e||jd%M_<^k;~X6M)YoD|-Zd6b`iZRt1ac;&}D z+S8d56V_n7au9K98$w|Yh;bOdi;6Zu9;xvrvfftC$FEhs^3rxbn$GvpE}HnAs$?uu zzcb2bGmmx=kYdSbKWZTM*A9kxGG4Tc`|cf1Jf8Zq7ly7VrfY`r_*Ak;5rAaN%m@f_UWjU?V9@|YJI{t~vk38<{>$+O6@FwP67s&WS ze6GxQR(R9{#_26fJp3K~b=pPxOTiJ{;2r9 zwaDN>Av{t_d122sUZ$|VTCGFU>N`BQy^op2_c0C}S+`z0Ga?P-uWq4?6M612c;s2+ znRp}f$mcK4g=?w#^kN?Qto3R|8@-jZOa1=LW8OH>_24&ZJ`>nKE6df|_*1z;R;{?^ zUlQNPyyETWe%ipiXjd-D-0ri{zgYgn(tFmz+%BXxZJptgz~f#Vj|W*SzqiBek1*ds zp5hPT`NB0(=BbZq-s0l^QiALo?bbzJEa&sb1@{srXv&kfU$^+PeD$wOKPc&ye_f&J z=k*8HMF}ilDLk~hs~DX`o3ULaZ?8X%;*L`434i=`qlM#04xQKkDS~`vVYoWiYD&=kaNc5lGL9d=T7^MWY&m=CN#<*na zjS`N`lb;yxf$&%RT??rupP#xVGTzG(L1+Fr*5)9IkR5z)2=mL`uFc0gi1tSp*}?n` zEFvi#{T_E%Y_#pSX6Uw>-w?L1U zQ8D!Q9c;&_`Rrw~y^ni7{2+AVcI`|-jSu6P{_dCu*iTb@*yjV$ez@IyEIpI|s`2?O zmHE8W{qEi?BQjQz1ljZAaRc+nt_d~nI{4el+v+uu%da~={BK9*$se>^AnI4ESN2Br zBa`*4tbZrzmqAq;kR>&4jPHIQ)jjH9k$#XJ;5H;*+*e_cDqIE(ksaof;VOTj`g8ZPy zty?DjOl^Coodfd}w-c8GI`U_A0#@yNvYs7Qzti2v59m+g!oKZ2-9070TccwoG%i|M zUf8l-LZ99*TKbd7{JZBd8z4aO;3dz8F55clk|aa%cnp!{GPqpOo{lpe6h4LTXERpa zFv;IBkJp=AWO?{AsYYB!sa>`c_vQKZ?`{0ca8`wyHg~L3 zo_*(d=FuNM{I*7*Ug49ONB{h_x4wt7!W)=RXB>Rh+QmiTefU1cleWS8r>p)Ml4N`s z-+Ftw_EY_HXCCA5+3?=8RsVdL$2ukS+NuMpf7xt5gyk0A{$*An_D|&ez4M#aadh%h z+gmd031~e3>9>L2Kad3JLH`6|9OiLK-B#&TeL1YJiazbjH8ZDb`xa_%<=A$>;_Ji3GvD8uFvHy%?zE8uo4V@G|k?*5_rrq_9(kpx_ z^C(|y=BNl~h0kOj?dACA?UuSQPkF*P4#aq_ji33lq_uzBI@@ifjJNEL1F5r0Ug<*_ zp*&UKJe?YJ?2Il=exQDdc{7B|wcVI7*FoWt2P^Zrn@-MfRQM#mk36^xoI1-%;nSE$ z`HnfWLi7rs#XRz`p{G98nR&`X37x!v7`cq0F&aW!(gZ7O2VEM%(>Wnv} zK~f^=H*!DDWlUiCzb+hFCBFrjSBB&>cpOV(IgC#|Gh!DMNy(F?|B<{u&xi3`E{Dri zI2?VeXi`D>EM8~0aXI4}nWyH{ev2uVppC({LZsiq@(GM4mS2{<#$4Q5P+rG!Mn)^k zSG)E1))JP2@^QSbOJz)9`KG!jT}t{FlsB-PJ7X5hr`*{a>}o0~pUCUwR7TeyWxRdD z?w2g(RZ!lY<$M^uSpIxQv7)6t3d(!(z9oy%!t(u6Zf`4NEGVDD`#QW2pTzPNnhl>` zRy@@cec5(V{_Xdx87yD-$;mb4#GtRr)4mkHvxfK4b;&YbQcB~56Ke*IWHYN% z#|IOazus+D?}qO(dyKV3?>!%_QKb?#r8Hh9GLQCKW`}=Ehg4~U%H#JyQ2uz% zU+VkO&Y5=Q>pUv{QYr78%RJ_#;+2k9Mfq`KK9$ioamQaSivO8> zAMtG%I^vf?3h&80)|Mp_kvab{g}sk^1`E| zpQ--mvi&%g`|;D(mkjJ5wKHc~6}Imw>-lq(IXH~}tF<%i7gAY|kIS%Mb>qtIBpGTa zS$rS+iB~tzcUH(xVI>Z% zKY>_piIYq^&{VfmT0F3AWqn{ZW=0BGIdRyB@C6Xa2k@Ods|2E2eE!n&5R>{Qt<0;7(nEzP*ewqCi*Z6|+ z1?E4Ne|M)x-BNJ{?Tpl~_Qg7O9CKbB8zymVT5_k!{T=0BG2Jm&B>72FES7nuK8J~20Ev6~^k zJe^Bm{zE^cny2@eJhnMz%MS3_v8}zGkhd@YG28GpFUIm@q4(C z!~2|)7r%cpUdA=I)8659@8`#bzK&V?xAra&<<;;r*YDR7TX(*4y7OL-(Ollaoq0UJ zt?Xa>a^N-NchK*{Job+(r!0$^HvcCvLdf>-LjMsL5IG69dw<##F73y&zSxB;_C)@< z3x4WT_&(y?HZ3>b_h0b+iwu@qmH2j{v#YeN)j!|I_anA9*>+X=euT5@7HQu!QR2Bv zRsEFjFF1QJkM9>u_IuJ#`F?@33FW_$9;yhonPa?^XYJ%TzS z-op3Yf01^V7rwMsd5_%LhwuAOk$mLcGY6FSyq!as$9vc-52W=`-oti|NBOC;ykU%f zs`8$+b27>^U-eR4igb>Oc?1NFdrxmkuN$FI7(( z>&cwIZO7iZnb9Oc{-8V%dTf83O~{d+Y%XuuD&q_<(SL)_x_C3`5xm}m?_>U%-eBMp z;^-2*vx#}UCtb95_x8fRb_sm%??ch=0Cee~{0M;5XUk6l>;1jH*Qb5W%|l5c`IE-? zVdGl8&JQ$Wl6ST+pT%hT@V*hTi+Z!Y|43!T`CVb-HW~Mw=LzYm9(<4AgLxPa{fRA|ctQUMD-iOPDFuok)_6&7FypHe3Gd?L)ay&1U_h>&*Ddd;HAx#0woZo<58IqBEw- z{CF|)eFqbNM$B|y=r0n&_whZJ7m=B^?^B6!s!$TQw{*5|W%>RKC-=czLAvPD))|HJ z_rD~?4`KVg>#Q#3fC#B2f804-zT>{0@q7 zcUkh{^uSrU(1Yg?KNio3=~UV?TUzu z85A85^D%8IL!(8VM@C17s$aGjQlvkH^=2>*uI2ru+o3xpNQvO}t~>JQcihSYGc*Hs z9raR|4xBbbs?M zr<()b&`r{V`T(M@MB|T)2|3b}%H=Z|`^|H2cJ;|0-lT`()$Nq=Vmuo$v8k;_$PV-Z z(Puj;6{q^^#rj%T9K1O8>ka|16TXq<@v$ z|8u0)!YAJ{ulMKs@YN9XhuGE0i{i2}4}VM(nvI4m@vh7#G5$WSZB@idd@{$8#{BH> zFXbCIEnM$e%vac5d=c6Vl}A4C`w-PvZuuJdQ2hgcwb8Kgs(;4aGHx%%+oAPu|C@jQ z%#ZQ(KZv$O`gMHY%J^HWm_6td#Cx#+Nz7OF8~Z2vj_~8Xe!TOe~P;X=x&&hzrnEbb~hwNe8@ngNg z6XPewrdeK4F|rqLXK#L-^Fi1XymK=1$V0goC?QSO+0>23i>-_#D%H)eYhO-Uvl4BUe)i;dItH=XVE-Ff1|rAzI#=ai%mxdXzOY&5pK zIplJAw=|g-SO2yf6PM_(kp%he#rK6y?HY7aOM?jrIDloNvX7^GeI&nxANAK(sgSNON$owoB3M*w#Ps ztS7yg=gB1F#d)NP;zfBN^h5^dy?IFSrf~TTM%TeFHh#N(#WK<(czrJ4M-1muGuIMF z7scy#K;{GS)GA&054B!HxV$IJ?JV0pq>L=C`H8*{#8?p%8Z?R)YAmV&`HOX59P6vJ zx8p9?_#V?pfc#D7`|#K7+Yi$W?LTeLNl0Fs|5^TU;zguLiwpBzF7sor{?u5F%Qhb~ z-+$DCzOYGoaXl#W;=!1ezVt2}As+LwiTTMD&fHPwJIu!x=KY=P7sY%m?7Vkf7ZDj@ zrr7ABd|_Re!g}UMRlD8!z?^TG*Jtv5wC8QtHfwuo=ACnyM|++%W%*<^&IIP&4#{}y z9R4H@iKIBwIX|AvJH9+y5^a)rKfaIl)72Qa2W^1(IOfrQ=C1nN4{e3=fW8C7A}$~( zs8fV_cx*seXpDVBqP$?9O=bP!X;f0b__)3H+Cy2s=G~Tt1F5^n;F9pFR5e5$Pd+llVUBF=Ft( z9>mclc;__cQIBbZ-`IXHhWx->0>s=y=M5qzbs10k971?}(;bmjUPae-NL- z_tCD(hF?oo+hqpxXjixYyjC3TlJbGM2Z*^a%uG8+`7a(yQa%u;Yr4$GjQjV#pH(7M zd%Z{SdN00@`gyUw`X_2W{Fz7noM>?>-?@mDd4Hbg+SQKsM?T13#0~`K(=&FkV#nrZ z8tWT1@sqO=e?GiNGXJF~#7<8(mp2@h@&578@gI`Ae%ONasLx;Ue1Yy$9z0my#8^7E za8=^yqIwJA`^ZDsOGn%9Y!V-D$KQX{^P$>qlI{3;r6=D(-=z33b^tNfP&-$1#s1jx zmCbsMHwKni*LvMd=JjsB$@o#PYdv+^ck2+3C-aD>%&I?!2tTxo{DFNS+93IZl#94+ z{Vk65RqE~AwN{@P{H}~XiSI-A%P*%aWivX;n;-LOj0xrz9%|mwIle6B2i4xt4Q+`0 zM7sil3k=A6@I-!Ehsk^xk4Y@^=Z|NDwv@4uFM`+m@O|W~uyJg@`6h&US!QvosF!X4XKMgE{{GV6`W>fHQY*z!a0CzJ0(Zu5eFx~O@JXFiv4VI%iW zYTn$A%Q$h~7*WIbC~`x2*Ks*dmYY#1qZM*UJj&xd^Yra)b=C5ITrQ4rcGqcZ)p0C| z`(YyUn}+|~3vGz{i8U{!|%Hv!tv}*Z{pbZ=c#v zD=hvYf83c*WL*5)&EBw0{$M=>#GWZScJLsvRusz&IiEo%+qL35cuGdtiU& z^{%I6{P1gEpMZ4eAiq4A_vC!d&pI+ettS)namDf zaiRYMF%D?I2hH;{p4m{I6WCq~aN#8|%lSdG_}vrdFpSDzck zMYDh0o=Ur~Pem-`e;Sud4EUe|+8Oai z?7P|iW!Lb0?@f529NT|lcsfnBZ)Dz|F=K1Sbc|J`KZ*UbG9Qt3EmeIkn#1e4B>RIukW5*G59}HwW`VhX4bEb;btaYJ*>M5RiJU1P?;n*m8l?u})0sy<^ndwR9j83rmdC6v(!Z4PM`!PO9jSfY{=e!Y0!|84<8(hO z_4M}M<-6hO#OWj^cs>69EPVf?rSlD_AU`c!4)2v#ZT@qd zY>2+R`;Dh|UZv%O?_*zJo$H7#y^i9sGLL$1e(zL}u&-UjC)x3p4Cnfy4HBPb$L~Hd z|5LP8iUVUE5Ocn^FHmA3gF>GzFS_$Gt~=cyS3CB1jmgaGJ@`J>xiM|_*U_An<(*B; zBc5k>!~a1%ulZah@JY<$y|aWE=O*P#W;SNtF^%~KbVFRf9a#8Ng$I|k^_0-B z$KQ2D`7DO<%HK|Z zl%Yu@Rlk*ad=DUQ>r+=nzjG4v_#VLB^Ec-D=%b|FXCo;$QTA{Z!RI-E6M^%MwGrtguD( z5BgC*1GQ7l{-|VNAzktf1?97NT?Tm%mXFOnms8ACP#*p#@%ZA;^8IJb|D(89L3w-s6IkB0*R;ANJPOL& z`=7@0&1PMAQ_@&a-roNlmd~}U`oz_>pnMv~i@%?0yejjP{^_05v=>$LPwy)w*o_Y+ zmKUNr8lUj@mNB1x-M>)>;^?CGmBjM+o{?Xzg%=%?G+N`+m`A&roLT#ti^6BY-ZJTD z$t87D3Mstqn!Jzp-KkO0j|>WLWFF(su<8d^6jpdI<}v;ZJD#w(h{F3bkN&qh(78=f zg|{+~{u6y^cE4f@pTs=Im&n&Y6)CRpY0P7MS+Mm=Y6*qUVjknm@8Napm1JJj)qB7H zEB|hCWK^f1yzl6U`mn8!jMrt}I{h=XYj=H%K%KaVH}QS^4%h9Ff#X{?KeHUXg?aoA zSF6mJx)+)@{|9^m^Y|UE8N;W!ZLA&V&b(s^^O#TX+`aMouv<->GdX0y{@2pKtq*sa zo?RcTJ(?u{a+t?_I(^OEy$kB!T?_rLS+ZOsx*@K1PY$HJKH2C=|Nr0lG6%gcUnbU@ z_*=WAxjt`f`!g%wN4`QA_0+Ggvwb|-BY%^aN4|Pr`###^&)>DRJn?DFBVV8Pj{fO# za)0fNL-7BPu`dsd@%rAMNoJCXSYjVb8MTc)T53==)G{by9~23~Sd$WrJt%_GR4vnw zme@lrv6Mj(wWX-W(u%EOk3FT@p_bo!=00cKc@zD8-#=Wr&vVW_=iGCb_nmhM$OO*u zI&}Z*H6O13<1p*jTowNE{^Q>4?;oCuzWbbU6L5}KwT;g9d*>fv`vR=M>ym(S%=q@* z5lyZh=t}=r+V`zb{2b%JV1qj#g;0UVL!QUi>XUP(1WI_sLSbJLcsn0n*`$+jUY~e= z7<{1f#DFBPdT;xgkmK?B`~9%CffAkyTyssdGs=9qre4x-LOqYKIQ#tLK@x5S&f{y= z;$2IEfh+4zP$cWex)TY0!>_E@c%Bi~de^I(xQ^2eH zN7TPz@Q>P8udkWl{n_i`Zv|EQh|lX2udkZxA}$Tv{-P@s??1m2U%ftsgMXm!55wu# z0cFhi4&tlVr%3P%ws2H05}A{)UY`=d|7URjz@ia3`D{P0uc_d_2uhe(%$k$0wm%#E znx>=UiihXqtL-=45b+7UR*ezu6H927ex!qNKA++Dq2C>A@5iPyS|5_H&+vP6 z!fy%xzILCV6%g@8fA&C8&+>)$B%P7vV1q1{CH)b=Q&3)Y zzI5s&ob_{j?v`FSQP!UgIganSg#I06{prBNZVNwp_N}&6FX;~h9uB-&%oJmggme7a z|Fr4NSIPc!{9_@%|BrwNvVDoD=lC=^bfc7PUkY&cFTGBMS+f6pK9dgK&JB&1%Jy^n z{QiUUrbmlmrO%uU;_u#OJ>gyrOd>U-Vc*#bY0)FbG+xh9e$?`#b)}Ic3CioxyU=PbmkK?56DqC#b=~xLf$OqS&+V;p9q!j z{j1)MrcyU(_~7QBDeos88XG+V6!O>id`JZJt&Q0}|MLb*>Jx|J6_0vFxA*w<)44z6 zzl7_Pfb)31@^H>7+1^y(5y<0HCtHNc{gnxv`*V-J>3!}mrOmfK=Q6y%^2RI}LVj>w zneL0Yj9m5avGWbuZX=3(Ukv}gLG|RH4SWa6laC8EA&d_4FCO)=$hXUbyPuK!I|(@F z!<>dM=F0ue@0a5J?X^e6s%ay=>b?4TzRQH3Cs)gj4Ulln1K|(r*EjxjLZF13fO9_e z?^WHZlW<-ydH>#O#=?XA{y_4N*UL!gS$(!y$$(gm_aL0tOO_v4zMET?Pl6o#7jwRD zAz3~ZIFF}iu{-MqO8Vo0XQJFZ`gvWQgtLD3@1eGSh^*iAP{fDFThO>RQ)T@c;8v6c zUR}Pfhklw5`TH4Gwi7%<{k*Y3h@*&x*#Gl<%lQxw{tq233pj6?Pw`7dzovlq)%F*I zdA!Q`#p_*Y%_Bi_erX>0`**w0!6R~hasP7s&;0Y=ZaKfWf346{Y|z0!<^1CQW%da^D*$(+e(+s2V9P)dx>Z#7QDz`qCNSo zUNyddh|lAJ_cw{)*V277tU$Pr>iv(bpZ7PZ;E$`jWp&s@^q6j$pPq8;wnM#nZ> z)xti)`F)FNklR@QqrU=xD>l9Legof+gj<4V5z)`v*wk4Kp`>E5aU*h_8EL41C% z0ne97;J5vF$v-@A3%0P20W4RM+UO%oHW*4+oFmCzl9*VDRlSK{>~N zFke6MjeqdxU0Aw0*pyR0zkeqS<0c#Ytrb4|hTm(!Qe;n#@&C7o-%p<=Obt>RvS%!avJm<-wzNZQX#0m{0ZwAhJzH9dL0`fkH^MmvJN<_Tx{oo|e zdCl@aEoo3U!1_kN1NswC9@KwUDG<04_nZ}3_i?&2Jyd-cNEKRMqY*%j=k8m+!lUiIC&>JeD&4ur|O*THhS9KF+)K z|4taGH3^R5!&}!q#~U?@A8*zx&2!;L$`8M`J>0FC_sXV%>(b4lp5roekdaZw{W+qF)Jj0B64kyO)OqNI3tFkpNz$3-1^LB|I7R{G52P)WmmnZ*bpwn_>`l zdI}^pxi|PpL$ZM1@`)CJvvDF=Q_29S#wS5mW{Q&ZXCXdr z@XWEo-a3CxE|bf63^s$GhB6Cs_ur{8JD2h3%gapUrSXN(Z_0D!f4Pju;PAl$PXXTs z{^Ikkp5{^VnDdA{@Y+9H@cBKAPVny)`Z6n2*=)&t8h2?JkNlp}WbjF!(qFn1o6yJa z2mS2Ej@P_tqyF@O&;3?;Mc5pzouoy+7+(r`-oN}jFn`Mc3AX^}d|ch#{%xRy+kx|V zn04fScO7uWm$%-hICAW;VZsWp9lq->F6g_oFtK6VUM0@MPF*VM`MOJ7SmKA0ygm~+ z-=Fc+RLk#s<~H;{$6?C5o@es)IMXW;2liuO1=FU02+;z?Q3KqHGIRbxJ@3N^k3>Dk z$^J*d3A`^NJRUfYyS*!a^L+=Aa3|XjUi;bo{|=Jk$omE^dH*mfmZKoz=opXwgq~5( z_?6#htqnsQ1LKzp+>N}gpZ%;`0F)|r1aQ6iwcrhY*tegui}xP1KG;yt`3Ai@1L_?p zXT4kgsho!rb#*T5yzhEBUth@t ze|#7Bzv^|~+dsg=G&M?3Qu*^BTIz*o`0?`#=tC{c6eaQbyS6-UrGuZEuX?Gx=A3->yrt0! zzlZ)2GB%≤)GMubQ{Q!GGRr(A4~@d5iLd=Ph|YqxX$v@O%V$&gVq@E%TLqg*F-W zIQcjr7ry%aosr=87`$+Qpo&lPyfKd$Z#>T@f=_lR&$(;eu(R1GeP;$B zNEGKx@Z`8D{_E@=g+34PD!&h~!X=u!~x`;@lddjEaYfH?o)34K0$JTwrxqlMDkDFKY zN4kGiK4|<}z~}u=D)_y=c;vl*RpwLwC1HGIgZKPy`FnXCf<^k&_L_o4JeGAh@mD^q zW31E5SJ`U?f60+XmGfg<%Y3!HvEV-%GBu-sYCR)+<6&3=j2^Zd=@km_l@ zOU3*f0eN1x;_gG%9wuwhv4a@%2Tm{6d^GguRX@sE-H!D)~K`8yCp(nmockmfw1|$4|1n z2{^~6Y;4ur@_BjK6o30-kDgs6>yK3F|KXE%&1C&n;PEI|Rb2E~IBA{HV*b_46YZx0FIhX-5hUSZ)BNr0S>)(G**;CEzyBTE7{|%>nSitZ`$un#ll`{> zXZsJWntRXBe%KWWUdHpGQ-fh2jaR--$MKH`Z{K?p3K~paH+}yQU!9Lh;2-O8#SntL zWdY)=^D!O#ftH{hw1#rtkqnJjbv{x(jn^d3%e*39{C?_i{4MLD@oGao$t&1fe{UEX zJ$zuCgIM1F^u4Dl0rJ)Qyfg5Kq5W0hx)jv&{ql1YLh5*hg}m=~B3>_+tm^lQ=Lj0_ z>5$JxdF92;zj^K%&cf^lN@Y4l(H_BEYxr(!`DOmK&VzE^l{U&`C=QYjL%lJ-@Gqc4n>s-f&ignE@MV7u{32Mw`F**3-hcDTH}&Oy z;P>S+9?`VHHuja;cS5fVWtXqc+?VaQqu!13`x=&ty!?|1lE@&Qxyw4%qiei#dgI5c@DeCE-Vg)PWc1=m?o&(~kJ%pd99TLafe0_S{uwS3Yc zjsw}j|L2lpFaWWH9-kda(DzQWoyPbDTfN(M@|S<#;CAZP`R60n>BS*uL_E@ucWcT% z6K)6-{_#9l^x;1d!I)2I9!XRAVFv$q=f)!(cQ%>y#e;7HFaMgnYdQXebN@Jjhi^UC ziTCt`^Y3=-PxDKT?y^5_$gw|>0oVG<{;(gZW5hTZxxHaG9sKd?A1UfR(DSqN{xH3S z8w-kf@O%Bbo?l%r=s)6N0ss1hPn&Q~$??cQJ9hA<-7d70<0i)=0r=!UTDUo0lqWp4 zx#Y3XF2*-4P(J$dBn^6Yg&wb0Ds|Q^s#CZqjW;0-H%QrfTI5vN4ppY5_H@i`~y_aJ{$fbZW~ zD~QicX+ISf>TiEKc<@ip&r|TcQ0eC4ksN2Q{e^{Jtbg&kfN0kLU;QxR&1Z@H`XK`P z+E#tpveD-ovpLRA)bqU2b6#Vc9A_7BK99MT`tNb>GqTeS+=6&mPYP`Pz_Rq=saUOX7!UVtfUAchs{BgLNWrWmEI{Ul+{X9-TH%Ce7UVk-Gg%b2H*~qbH3YKQ0~vnBL4lk@Smu0vVX~t zV>_SsANf?aF9CQO$}00l1af~;fAe^XMZP&F|CP+KB-~J3_+^HCJ=62qvVU2qH-lI6 zVQY&t9`r`U)doC$@WqKdZ;*Zq^2`Bzu&wN{+{Po%|1-xsW=QeTCqph4^V!EyBfe$- zD9?C3;F8x$$D4HZ<{A5(1$`Go+P<7vC4YI&SC;3J^$d&U-VpnA&ew3Gh}+kfGR%)w zSKmY|%2zw;xxMvqjsIp1-gsl4=kuP0o$h*qO@cwV6Y?&U5A+{gFi1GdalS4NTHH}5 z;he7-kPrVeTC10E59&Ezzn;+I?;r_x12>is{tdX2KPE)NlaUW>$AYM%J+%^Uft(#> zXw;{rjuLP~f!R3Pbz6&vJpkAaF^4em{@~M{fHwH~49_mOte@V?M<< z4gH@5-m89Xw&Vvv>9e<<2MvuL;M;I0dbF8y#kjSU6miP?;(90hF7pCXrQo_q)N>xR zPu+e+wj&-m=XJI8gjQ1C>r&eI&kI_+`2yO9%8gEsqNx!(8&5F=Eg_2RkDB zp(!Q&D0E_V>dPt*zG6SjsAoS`uBiQkY=;dv&#&7S<~t$Jue{%7Kfm78f3@VNJ^}LV z$LPc7AF&_QUk>2OD4+GeY?bF9o)_KN54116_h}u6k#vPDj`y1UF{H<)i4R`{|xI)@K^8Cr|J237h zo?ZS**3a=}`^GhC(^bZ^RQe--E73{Tp9b9Uj)+6zgKIl^+$izUrKs+IxgL_)Pwsy+ z(cpBoH0KCQT)t=*YgT|3Q6ZxGCe8`x8z9|R; z2sZ*x18)8B+_!W;E**p?@OTFv)Lb*w`y&x>5B7_Qoe@(c?)K*w6lzA3fJ7+virhcxfO86xqk^d%(N@ zu-PujK3#Zg|M*>A-K(4&e@i(LAGS|>w6sOG&kmg9*Sk-r|H<|_fpdKJ3@Z|zn|&_u z{uo=ZD%+>D^VU2Y5gj!$X1K6a@zZyHk^w!%Pe170bN`jv$TNLdynmc;OzZcp?1$-H z|2$}XpiCJ1q3k<+_itOlbljD4T#(eUV*9b0oO>7%I ztZ(#)k&Z#CeJR_X3cbIaAJ+SIy^h03C+XuhxMUlLMSCgUrYUaOkPj;_{Lkz$=|TL0 zZ<-T9!F3kY^LwD1_DwnM6&ASO4m=ThKC5+pt-K!d^9qb#>|OP&j5{IkLaD2^@CC2e zVvp~4DvpmCyrxr()i?*)3vax!KG?v! z+_r3KX+Pupjw`<}dDPg7;~k~>s49aiT-B!|J52FlAF8-@>i~n z>nO|fcwzaDdusI2n?w(geHOEb59fPGMSD7*Kj)V3cJNnxF|$@K_v7ctcPIF*Yc(0g zbHCjGM&QXPmp^UYQ{K;Kz^@G8m&c3^miF^{7jO^oy{#%e;yIN3%f#=-obPpetUE8~ z7k?+1^XvD&M^%#Z%U(sqhu8P7ZRHEf>pP#1Il*i5>C$n$zEk@y)N_7rIMk{r?~igD zk8bdfPG0*X_oEyy3-An-`>HhYy-(enZy2wJs>1Gf7maqw^Q#&4oDa7gWeUmXuY7&c z2402P=RCYtlYTqeW%-{b4Xr8XBgZ2F@@ILRZ%4&Z4hPe*?h z&UvHs+cTbfxa2u&n0H^^Y0&V2L!;xcaZ=jzy~o8+O~fPmcHF~lX5$AGQw7&qP|rEB z>UPLBIo@{QoIgbtjNZju^2Z6B`{PNUq<*qLF5n!m&;k!u$o-K8Ki%Lx`=NZWoc{)# z?>W5U+GjGnzTf5|b za01UnIk->Y5qX@mA0GHo`O26kvLB`z7{{0=W<6>Dg&b$TuFU)2Cr74z&3j6UQzGt< z;XJ5PWBY2hmGF4z&&K)afNtBf<#{9tIOjn}L-!T(xQPUwigM4DQwG_7E9x^*)=4&p z%KgB$a>;Ew-uyhFk^8|^Q^e!zL9_pP+`h>}inZd;TldwD5tX?+{PZ}Wr{lTM!=JTD zK1(EuhZDau@V=+=s_n&Oe^VgG>r>4&y0{>dXhMQLB7|i9HJznMMDn zIB*_w$$b&?mhYR!LSNT?zohKiGo{1-PfsUhfD9iglOr{CqC$2VCf9-VdjNXKEO-mDg$Z zkN6Sb^SqP={zpA~{>AGy^QrxGj2q*7B3{PblRJc(1cPvAK2gu(_Wk&?=jCzhU^$c_ z50~8L^_k@PekGRw@STVlSv~=B$td%Te)W$$5A*q98t|ce_MYW=j`U}tp63ni+`9|% z%l6~<7Q_3(k5RAO#|ucf8TB^kaecM;moVUz54@&u$!#mw75a?y+g*rp%je?`=&ial zrQ+iK;9gM63#)-^Y9j@R7Hop;Ic$^g#(eoUn>wi(GK0kc7wMJsE7@)8G4_mhE#wp4(qGzC{%&AAH{p zw`1Mi_Sre#?}K!HVM9Lh`LrAQ&To0TGMDpJ90}dPttX8=}Fu{X1+)ijpTj{Z8n$0-yW+1^K#K5c_8b&xJDY zt`BT%2h>r%=qJ$4*@<(I@GR8x^^cR+g16E8lj$IwpA+Q%`X}w|2D!h?ABZ@x z{KvhfU6b##wK0zI@yxZ%9xCZ~0Ox#3>ph}&UI{kzX{owjC#)J&vq^7 z69##UMrTMwKJfUoqyN$%_u%QzhQcQA8twI&{-Jr0O3;l z6LBe+ae8u5CZZ&}HLxoJyx0bfniZ3A?91YTw{6oV(|c2&!XbGJ_N__457s}b=iBlL zw`1R$3VcRdzKbQGpYG>X|DHh*{mv1N^Sw;SX)MAI!s&M#qx3h8H-1il-+Rr^MMaj} z`HT9wFvTw4zTJY~V~o9b+%NoBi+ZG=^znP4`23m6B3q98zOPGMI%IvOqGBH~;L94% zEd#p80N3&NKzY7gy!DS?y~09Xp9OzhP9gv8^V%P4K~VJTVhf6TuDh97X}T5%7w zE#l{7e^4faU%Sg3BVVVH`9?gKk^vsSZ{oy)JD2cC*mj(O} zYdstt%mWr;#8=150e=5M+pDPKMdO&`CC8EO%Xh&K7vy(Ytzv)Oxwh`lc|;?Bxm}i5*V`dS^@@MK--}{VUt`L&9c&lnYXa&ypSO$}GEmBA z9q$)eZ>!F6zL!vue40xBWykfGC3$@^@GO*PEdf?(Jm?JgU4r$emwlNm+h_hr#DVQg zbQLcv>o)+mq0DcXxtqrm`ESSh0qZaMNpu@oe}YQ?3TN5RW&O#(c|6C|Xx!P)emw8M z`d?~iK9==osq`PHGUKkSKMlB{vG8+Z)f;Cd`}GdsX5fE>w4A7u<`Wz0c|O@wt7RL# zg!6lY9pKH}v~fTXaLOmnS2>@&al`eHWXRobx6JpvGWB~Z>bYMotvey-jXqOl*H;rB z*Oua@*I0$W9M@D&9-HiU0_08L-5=IDZ!qkpb<2W$V!y56?MZ2>Hz@O@><{q`L&dz# z?L~rr_}G|5A;z5iWQ=1E%0%$(`Ip?wlgql2f_23Kek%Ah4i#J8dfra&(~Wj2V@f%c zxccU!uqGltbr;nxGcm9-Uq{keP|yBlP5$|mS6ImF?ZCOedv(uh%l%FL<^;}h{o~Q) zWR5HKJD>k?J}1ntbWF}?H{`kBlm8jIUC!qW;M_06_EwCS``rVa`{Dk3hg-`1?qdB- zh5rXr$Idpq>GvRYzgxiDwduswkevM_k(CxHLWq9N)W1ewa0Zp$^q^rQFXu zBDeY8Cr|qjwVfX5sb25k&$-x{<9R|;GvQzOyh-W2##0RFpng%?N%h|MU7(!^$g^xb z{+9iveTxhABv0cbMRi?rbDP^o38RC?R|fd}`|bb2w|&8VNw^0%-!J)7?cwvd&j~j+ z7k)9Gr^PS%_*yREzUSKxihg)B%y@(M6yEkni+T_69+Ce%WSQxl5B&3^%=oE$M07-aJdo%4Vf?P^HMAzd@cQ3E_|JJW zV#JX`0TRx?KU=`--~Ef-ffAlJOSI4Whg@H-*Gf2l&(aC`JZt~gMb_^^eHQdYPnlg= z*3a#`!Ta@}f1m5#=-0V$p2#upocu$A1_$})fgIa6=*zQpwQuBo_lFr9$+#ffpMmzBz{@9{T+Zih-uwXW0zR(T{ zwDH#av|bU!B@ze%(q81=qPy&-S0#ducPo3D)>$nCRzF5o9tZ=KH9<-PtRKiIxS*KeGX^|O2i zp!-)ko^p6FZ|={(UZ3C$;4FHL!NIq&(c2}b4r#^fm{~G@veD;i*TM%`{}?r&OMgh znkDP!alrF;|8q0PaGXg#EW&>rq?T>oP;NgQxCQg-zcVyz<@O_hbNku*Hjb9tw;?_* ztPh7>X-nliNL0yJdcVU)*}fFuoF|tymj7P1&xZXX@7sTFFf38-pKQpxuhdf@_jr^^>JPy+#ABOU)5BGd4+nGHTtX1iejQRkdX?AL$UMfbxuBYWtsjOL%c_50#k(4T+qb7T6zUI(dd zvdh#-#Dnd+*=(d+w#y2f^R3D`do?-VB7t+h)vMH?oSbiIXg40b5|I(x<^Hf95P8JU z<()iw_MY6|NsvoLdFRf{liXjFFX7Oi3B3D+Tjk|^ND4I@O&j|KIZ)l#f9ftp2y;wKCQ)m6K?Dx;=%Lmx>em$cdOc;c0cAfxqY5z zGthpga;g30yzr>xow0X*lI=5g75?))Tk_!SW^CVo7Q; z$a#^7dd`aqH~adn&zhZLJn(o6dvD4KdAy}Vp2u5jP2bJ(cuN7Ejq;OK)vw9(2>+i; zmR07oPoj~al;83AJvF==#?23_fBm9l**olq9rf(TZ#&-cdv4hYoc$;f@=Zb64;OIu zW9G(W1KUFR8OHJ`o1G1ABhMQdsE@?_v8`R95pw@q;J*jF9iNsiBj;BJ=bv5pccsAP zkvzVr|Jhb90}-1}asBZ>@BHbT2kg)jo_JuwvROSZ5Q+4#Ovz3l{P0Jzh5YArgiBse$p1Hf`z_OC zzcv>75>a;iX7!xkl0DuqD!48U_3YEfAAN9I_TLOV3uV!Xb)Rz1QoqF_K8Btm4mCl2k9YRvDZw!y+=BkGfj9r=w0-iv*N*Yz0Pc8D>;|t#6c?U*x#aN>HN5|u z6C60CwC5XF$#7BKe1lH)xGzaQ8|NW*;KR*JwsM~n?nFK7zxwM>pYooP@I=VF!25LT z#FyTi{)K;fGtTGTz=!>*FU9v?k$i?q|L9w`);!h-cVS)ifah7>_%9xlbe%$dy;HGz}v>2JDj>Q+5Z&c6c@pW0F5T(7<#iR!JIAWb~Dfvmcz@r;`*ryH zC48RJ{hvG4a``dthbM)VD|1n*lUR-bOBjUjKcYU|!&OohIFeuL=fpa?_ zZX2{b0Jt146L|3`ot?kC#m|olZ6dz>9zK4beG>RDYp=SjGci+?ivA#VeAB_do?fE{ z-$&0<#8<~x6Dj;lin=|R=6*T8%6y<)NPlxsKC9zRDE;22LA&A57l|?!rN3USHUae{ zuV6XuBjUBGTV-O1L(b1M$e;bXb-%1a3!{la@#gmx?iI1@YDKjs<^53tON*7yat@FDHTDX~?IggLu(^ ze#-we3;&xhMq~qZ`=&93JWODIG?%XJwX3KZ=NMl^!Vn%@O~mbv(_A5 z-t0o0_XZLL*V$3eaXoo`U_m*qPT(AmO07rc=lf{MPW~>73D^A#-0pE+8!7B0+zomD zZcFzHKk5P`oUemrfH&mtvC)AN?m@i+@5e0E^{Zz(33mZE_80!8p7+exJ2c*d;>7zv zE;(Mxc~bMw1daOBcb;U2o_s&HIB;g;*c75roZ?Zh==2^_icTMm{}QfG0?vM%8~$$B zz(~O$JQX{y z?fd2T1EGiebJ5YLO99{sw%1?175XAkUffZ)e;|0|Pa^8M-~XL(X1`9tQ-Je&_4ww~ zIK6~({?MAN(()rL50 zm1|}C<^%e_V!t+GfQT1AU-!RyGg^H!`*=9xvB3HHx?9&b?AzZhv-S}L(iO5ou&myxMx1bKk%f%JC+1Wc-TN; zzXsm}8s046N1cR+19vVLdQ4+mpVUiu1aO{z@~oI|50dcoRYER)g(&ZAsL@%M={4V* z?};k;nM3D1)dN@VYt_6XsG5gqK&i_y=;p}%7@Xhb6_&7kq4Gw?5 zYqY2^Cs4x8z!MPn=}(u>)JeDvIQxC(X~k`N;AD4M*qujHP&rKyqn+}d?M{IF-KsxK z)Jizpodi6!Xx(A~5}t~B?yvm)|Fj26cqZ^f#Qm$i9}d?^xMq;>o9+HJec@0&aI(8R z?Czz{x~DM-yJ_9FL!SxqR+Q`VKCK)SCU_9_?mHq7HwWyogMX=Q*4<#VC-ZH{j}-J* z0{DyCW$rN`t}@?*e2fL(4gRYWliv@?WTq&|{uJbY7I^89tJ>{m|2#SQL56QdzJ^22 zI9SB3@sWb1Leq2T_kB0oh;d{Czt{Z1=kliJM zF9&U|Ul2TMkADYZeFGQGI;D@y*`5>fJl|elu`e(vF=u;r@LVWo3{L7&2nd~`88Gezm`AMD4R;7vG`|59=A2*E`@t~JsuEhnkNS_#OZdC% zyiYms$`~DxOMhfRpJBL&OT=%b8_3@`w4k2*V_eLrF8qB%>MuKR-lqiLZL>`Orayh_ zd~Fdz&5c%;S)JBxSVDg)v*%miZxuCiwgw- zo?o?5GiK`~+z^X?#`Tb}Q%$<)fh+kF%0#}Fs{=Ibu6?@h@sUw1JB z=k@j8(xwmP>n=9nJl{8M)n%fzKKkbS_eIDx^Cq8u=|;waD|ehy5KT;!<#2 zz%uzf*@AkGM|AAKfIy5xSwF8ANl|ATX(QgWZ-=}S<@2xFtHp$AU$ zYXwta>c&@|6gF~eGhWFPtw+V!sV9l1DY)kiInV62OZpv2#f%c!cwO$@;FXHvXUw z7Z%C$Wd`KApIg88sC`f*TP{k{=LXM%(s}nxQ~5i9>UfyPhF7Ry?hV3e)WVSMfdg&*Er-;Xx_g@&x82t6q?*e=s+TTv)>MHjA zcE|@pGy#9he0mNj3H3yy>)XcsV%}pOKi^NdMWfebf}a`a&tpE9#OFh4CrC3^_(OF{ ze0|c+JFEhKJr2R&+8GdH*2Gt=GU48OTm5XSvsCq)Yv*k6~8=x0WoAe zwWhH9Xyd%6tA2L)m>T!s_oAxI8#$(-fZ9SfkA6ac3JR;(2G?4>q1hnJ>5R!S&eQ8tu{x z-LGy`x6gj??}Wd8aCCNw`p8`HZNA|WBXWNpD}G$@;bo!WPf;`HI5hl z{2o52B%dcRU-rj{{<+=q>Za^l-OCY2!F}f=eBQsyp3+8}Bs9qK*5<m>~SzKIq{1K=5Sy95sY} ziG~`+e>XoHOd4d|-BIApyB6NH?8J#lYCOJ}z%T#rdX*2Oqk@3@-q*qJ&q-deFHuXN za>)KWaUISLJHJ0V`162FFU|K4`IA0bw8PiAmY1GePMa+#gc~LbKl!|7ToL8F#1d`> z&hb06a!v{P`lt;!_vh>CKLzU~c?WRLpLcfdt)rLl1mL`{KN#5cWsrm?1Lu4#F>BkH zUq$Bh41E>CWp?@<_CW9CMP5v4MRQ*kS zCwP3lIt~2Q=C9_4rTbFD`yb-l!RPDp9`Hk+F56fzH7DPV@neCUd9sLKr6#-L3Z>-a zJHdCMw1YqNq`h0FU#*2L9BG_3j%Za`N5a^Y83V@XPf) zcd3LmC*P&wCxib>-6xw$hUet_-sb`yzyD@h_OXqna^ds-$;s_Z5&o|0P{mo=lv95= zzC&*V-va)!m?sr-*+1p@-QNNJq+gC)qWu%kb<`5=b1c~B@bCC8@C6>Aa~2l!8^14S zeY35@{m%cu=kaZ5yCBx@{BNr8kH@!p%)`k6HsL4DA72UnPFL!QpMcTj02l3VMPXK?-$-dol+rO&g?*{)P**t%LYg| zzqiB$-ti$nUJR6Q-Y4)n9lCz>Blel{CgF_8%Sg!o`)9@H0it=Y{|2kTS!QGKH`4(V zu1|s-+h6_Iv@EUEeyYm;1D9TYF54duJQL;W)6>kd{ruiZwtvI@)X8iMwXc~j;$uSj z?TbfII;nllJYl~Tc+2k7+?p`_URnh|FKOc^I!d1 zgM;i#g&fBx^iri!TB-d^;M~7`kM6lHx1R)DGeh`!ql9Cw>>tO6?Qi$&^JcQV3367H zk26C@%l=0~e)iRpTcce1X4tk0bA|xBc?K@3~v+OymdrcvWb^3GP3d$JF*m zg5UksJ41CC$J7=b#8=xN4}QH*L;ut(9NB)Fm(=!?9`efsxfGO{C<#~Qp#YEcH}S&@ z_>V)=B=NV<7Z8wzzuO;;JVSMBcJ-QDXk8xf_o;=+&kHkk>kZ z^L-!Pw*~F|?bW$etUm!b-xK}8#|JxXI@S9&g`qNbHuWd1U z#`8H_eD-Cj+K-v@ckStM@3&|DhFQY?a#W!l#U9+ecczKRbm|u~aDKloKaaJ1eT9m0 zpO7q#%h)NxUK`~4)$LI&=*_&XccMOGs^HaowxfQqgu8&J1OGLoXJgKH((h*ZX+nPG z;9Cvk@15}Xo!H*W1E={t$LfJR&kLJ0TQ3Gk?PmZt&K7YwcIw3>ey=LEZ$W(|zU#8| z!-7xvyCj6$foB45`SJRT^7lxbEI(7&|CM>vlzdYAE|v#gq*94X{5=wSk3};2lk+qM z=XY+%EwNQE$GJp(LI;f(b)Hi_t>b3s%YeKc@6`yKBm9^9nAUMK>PcR~-um9}PJ_lN zPjnE=n-{+8J`Tt?+4onC)rT5+*X;k&Gg74|5%MW07yn{=R^L|Sd$gm=Ks`U_Jh9#K zDPALl9eNLNzFzjx`a5UYN2ULC8SO;BaNWmyHrs91jQT zdAwa*vgEoP4>#l!z$-B-{4;sJZ~;#Sp4Gm7Z=Nq`-LoUk9FH{ce!cyBFXeQ?@9?gB zs`)+(d?I?|e?Y{a^;KxC_j@mfWuAx!+cV*0r8AN}L27&K;8$<)$5XXE-gQi6kFZ0z zz6&`gw}+B&TE|kQzsYXRd0{uldEJS_{dvDkapLoeY{;>HqhegodHy5abPzxFw9v=z zy$$*4(i*%NzK*vr?I z9u+HBTpKAg5N=IG9^k%#MaB1(36O9e=aJx*pFXWlpoGVxJ`&@7;E-{hgMm~0BhWtk zkp%v!k{`tyA~b#n+2cSS^Lg&jE$!b8vWO z-_8df;Ss3k@#koK;zoYpxm6| zlASl(7oJ`QNYu&gxzXNd zVFzq2irZHZh1%om2%NX$8h>_Ji+oVx?EAflpDQvf5dN=C7`0nHZ;*Y;O}yTNOYXX; zesQCshBnFN=`pVzzPQ+-e|6#318WS*_d6*gJNbDMw)59VJ4fecXA0!`ysS#Wa{mOt zA7R;l@5=^6^^1-}0Oj~;77D-5HhMkeSbWt4*yVfwF3;P6!!GRPcF1lUp9$cH zKHOc-V9Lo?_oo~Dufv8K`Mi*&y!vO0b)B!bXMrDlW<;+%3Q_LQFpVZ4h=rAs=2>#OVdT7o^3QdtKM8#BkYL>&i+*1*s%?Uy)TxUZ)+x|)Y za2H{8kR1-->}SJG`F-DkB0KoLFE081uW03F-?5z?%Igru3S~l{FYd|ETl4&T8#7y6 z^@fJ*$xzu-X2_B(RzUW6RQ4<{T%;Y_PIv-v;}YR-hSDC+gXs(K~lem*wq{ z<9^$;`FxU}Ja8w>r1&#j1q+UNV5T)^Mm-0y4dH^MoO-N1`aFOye3KTa&;Z(qG5 zjY1{+bP>V+746*zMCTC=RfeVtL*nA|8K~o@I@7$qqpsxEz7z7prgcA=Tl+5Hn-7J}l-swX z-i>nV$|rLr|MeO0D+BoNlb5IS98UgcpnpBUn=~Doz+>MVU(Wxf!v8+Mp3lp31mR(r zPb|P6jCwTBd$CnyNjJK0RCu1F3x{^z*!Zutmea{rm^c`;X^Se*c`WkJ0+=-X{F#_TAvu>a_R= z&I36fcHkK(>+CUoBxAv^~Uf=4_Z9$y}n{<7=7 zGRpDK0B&3^;!+}`%qA)S^!950{rlv@cdp3&Ylj^BKWOafA%6Y?XZt<~n%-CT-vZo) zGJM&y=5qe>_gz_jeEe@+WdGcd%RsrQ)i?k0no99A!#@x3Q}6fe$7?U)7UYR>h4Ax6 z-P1Su9F%Y#zr6l@c{Hq~?4KQSJiq*0d8gm|i7l9aI6f0^udOA^^ZMX|o@@Qy=`6=5 zzNE0r4SdeQ2$!56{JScTk85W%M!A1HkmK=H>t^{=eEpC7Gp-c+Ilj)o9vAp}ZEoYi z0{+@(*S^VZJg~oZ@cQ@sX;W_gCIJ8JSMxR5-wd`F_@K>md&=`s66Rwg;yNe)alieF zt(5R53-SjWd^JeUcV5ppp6~A&;gsWPUM1v{AwQ+dMz`F)0k{q2{fnJ0^LSC>{*2$v z!(|an7Rvi?M-Cbpr(8a1HN0QUuvq0Q%+b<3;@jsXK(G1Jf|oMNl&(b_rJr=EsOP?& zJ$lNglDyslJQL;PlQ(C{<0uXOXjTjVT0V9*lE;Y?aW?@!d92=Dd7Svh0oL0oP3ou0 z{Tc~5UWX^yA1sslRhJdvzmB~=Wvn3E9}oE?l+N|dYD)d0vsd?*ANom}QJbxDI9-=F>0heNmUdo=`G@cB9< z^RpoLdVEh;00#&Hq+fl%yK$|E*Xp82YXqwJd4;FC)7$Jtf%8$YjeW&g(U ze7_dWFKYY#%OC0o7xcSPZk!q9W!0jBF|UZLwi-__CGaEj%Qd?7_4n@r_qEU0Yf4?LG*!BP%=cc2f=#xq zC7J(qdfctVgEBnMwaLjM-h6*S-S2ALPVcijgWFF7&i5CL`sJ(o<*M#U1RjtDyf9TL z$AGw*ReSy2X)yg?nLFP4JX*|{;n5@HhmRD#953@aVOODY1@^^zj(T5l_Fwv9M+}Pj zFMUqv`>cDl7uTkRykh&5YcSq}OCDnbqZRv z>_L5sPT0@)J&&mI{)f60G=_rs$>2xo1>d+{l(l!fiqI$J8 z*>dvL_PW8pzg4>{zr~+V_8MSs7I;-6&O{dgkJ{(wlX!kKZV>)&sDCLT4D$wSCBAyT zvVec&R?F;yMrMkV`0Dx80sfXc#hMjT&8M`E@O-L_E#Kk2-iUe41$o}nq~ULwPrvJA zqMnq{IOV3e_K@6z$7TWPuLg2&Gm&HJfFV5yZaHX)oU*4 z*JnU4U;nPPqs`?233mhcpxk`q$?!l4H*OO89cV{0VPth3aK(;iyochF_j)33JQHcW zhwQH%dP_x5c$K%ozut_K{dHN;ZtBK3`FtiBa{PNhgATuZB45u>1J3?7?K|cxzMfC^ z@_fl9?_s3=@fj`KYuGI8d0nGU>g%RgUywtxy#~amSJN-kWP9z9V|zzdaAnK(I)Ssj zF{7ULV|$hH5o`hOLdnmC%zctKRiAUd3QmCkSt#9*yIA`qPs{er18j z&y`FnIq!OKF8oM5M{D6Yr--;z%U5!^`geHJ??PU2d~D#KGUxj##OnY10`YC&bN@TR zud`=M;XL6v`RecGCWGJSYVUEOrks5B_i{79f4O~nCAu$7$r0Z{_NeD4!xrK1qX$1; z%%@BiGN1N)iK_jc1$D9+%{O^MMKXBOgxs)uxRUE|Gi|%I_s}0O#}VxrvPq1v%f?mw@&Yz$<&_`Q~8YN`C~Y^EDZ~ zCX;Um8XQ6o|4V#zzNUfSa9_x<5IZwPNqlv_dceQ@?Xy~WZ2tXCe09E>w~4r&8a|^ek`Tyyl#Ib-pHme_?N}68Vfd`RaUigWv34My>p+e5Li2^VQ!@ zoyLKF$bvktr^fBVKbcSKX*lXBl9b00s{01(Ue4zep*)NQpYxzj#}n7I%J_r4?>!8O z;LRO)EKt5KlY)AFPtUIZ?Rv)7Wfc9s^OOkOPgeNQt75}@Zu3sf)IP75d|%?d-|txh ztls7|NQ9SJ_`~y3!ve=w%kz?Thlmfyb(phrb3?QwQT$?^S$?f?Gk>IJ&GN^>q|Ti`FhN?%1e&^*Yzdl+o130 znon!+bs6@R^sDD@C-^NJEW4N6^`&&xxJ{PqRq{X=-c95qUthY_xx%-cm$~)BfB8ds z<$-?VZV{IsTRf=6eh_X$J&&W$9+g`nU0?FyoR@#jx)2nI{#N9D*MCke_@D~)MfCma z<5$l)V4@f)xHcL3`TEZX^`n-D{F@lbcp7lN{*!0gtC?X3W4zZ=Nq-h_K0nK^D?9sk zz)0^MU=)AD9^n_yGd!QI7}n-I&o|T-9prBU+XK0P-+yb!-vg)ks_%bhefbP+<8#wz zhaM-&vTF*pl;0oZKzqr+!}@%7Py7#iGV+IUR|@<)mH zTd#kOjv6{D+IMC|Y|$UoM|7Bf6mfG-__$5g9S{3b9mR+5`{jIC^<})@b8k+_aXx%= zzWrZ;CXyE8%?{j!lJ~V2H~w^+&yxgO@D1R(Rs6eUr}gFgwj_Rz{>g&egS2_EK~`pp zlKja++>LvMzn|W(e?HhI@Z9>_2HvJL=L-IAHftq)Y0&2Yuic(6Plj0D=;P}zJb$>r zTe@<>r9A(KdDRX6+%iWBhvqV`s^^<5@Poe87V!Ph4})o5<@tvDogkW5Gk9LuC*s2M zstte3e41AyQBU#;_SW}p({mccp+kw6Z(o-L`Sm|$|1!Ms`ksuZq24@H%zM-3e|Njc zs>Y8Q&jOyI5qR)N#S=c>G0poO8q#mrFYGr32t2O*p6PpHwl0KxfEoDHkKXmxwd`1L z$sbkHBUrx;IL}WTE}V-m+v#x^#vQ{xGo6Y{Ka9<`d+3JZ@s-A(-6s?K& zGPu11A`TraTaU{7NPZrPe{Wtiq)lh`O|eHCf$Ppmc>ZH^@aLMn8+ZQ!e{>1Z%Q7pE z?m8^D?*N{R@{6OrPIymh5RWv*@f^nTi`Ab>=S9Bf9#-d)xzu9M|CW!vveOYM5mr4J%&t!fI^o{J&=zZRw zk#0Jaxa8PpW`e(_*X5?U?KADT&x(J?3_B$JB7I7~=`yrj;aAUp;2ysx;~{ox#GpXpmCta$HJp>8V@nmmf?2YY>Z;(NmG0`c2t zXV&<#wHnWCAn=ht6@BocM~98TeeLr;YyHM~4W;u{-#)fO=R!wFW?i{56V@f{N@M-8 zheiB&oftQ8i*8%vsRtQP1kUTkk>9U}E*>z~dwE^)KOhA-@8f>!*YJ3oyWJ0vypmgQ z{hrUr=(xB+!w359-zBoa8DZkTE|9|~m z)2ZTT8S8;X^iq6!NfOQ`k&Vx#5Dpu{$2A##o1ZGIr%~1 z;PZME54i(|n2Wjnt{JA{r-1)gktM0Q{jQmf@x%Hv!4FB+*2?X7%?RiZOA~%heZF|M z{JW;wUMqOtO)H(8+wYocdn3W0(06*j+@FI^sq><(>Dsp6dQszRy?|o`M?f>M1=5c;6iUYh0_48Je@0;TL_guiIWbBzP-8ZGT;=KZF z|I&puzhnDJzZ-HHC~tk-uOIJY2mKt zlQ59v?d3)L>|ge<|Hs&O2R2pxZ>McK*kP9)c2P!TSr9dVLfK)L9Y&$dhFw7*fJgz6 z3J66I!_u-O455HvkX4ZphESG-U3Sc)teYyKr{t&-~h-`cV!!c4S%z_|<$(0iK2OPSwj- zvKyry{wwG;W&Gn2c}V^}G|$ppfzQ=??ANAcm;H2#vm;S%$ zdG0*wu#88^DZv%^o(^&e`GM!vV?pou+r5};8PW^?**}s%cc(|6VGN+ang7h6{*JTP z)$1K2-W$UBEs3+gRO6Qgx$HlNnL972{l}a~`os4^?X#7?!S?Z#|M|X;o&b=}$xQ0;UC_))pd_)2~_2aYe_tyl@ai02LcFA^B)o&vo#)Gqkg0EA*hwdNJvSbdarI;UGkR$3n-}T8B zaa8(sNPFiQX@xxw&_x3OcIEF=)x5F-Hvk{>U9ZG&qmYp&IY>GTc-BPuBYWb{l0lSgZ&HiJAZxAp6}-&*W3D~8}y~R zy&B0gOr#g_NrPPdF&V$0X%|lM+CbnboR@%?5ASn^YkPsm0=EEvGB^BJUIVE9a$MxP zqjuT#lLFiLZS;1?JvOP@K=u>Wey%%Qpv(O-e;#$-<+&@}ap~Xl@9#b5`bF5Em`m1^ ze{NkPj47&IqxBsTbm+Lad zx6^N5eWAoRG#Pw$l-WxbD66hZ43O^xUZCQ@E$X_)9l$^8MVX=Mx`of3=>C#^*Q{|$ zr>YvLisEeUgFmyUgY8x4Nr7 zkKhC!?X$ht=CEp?6a2|jWFAb4I1#MscLS%NqdUyjQNO2u{pUGG@tj7FA#r}+q89mV z#eTBkr1alls~0~hr2TW3+e zF+=)abVtLcDt|)^Gq`WAj^A8|TOsFkqaSL&ZGH<}huc8k`NqN>f%BWN z-wfP|a!t?W_0;#!=~1saE$v)TJ#3l!9y$$hJ@8A-$9%%|tr-6T*R@8?W~?!xQ^PNm=ENiX)aRxZTu$ie_qXzs`7KaP5u?BFINQVWsmpv2k%7bj4`B1Yme~C+DzYn=3a>RoN8O}@pxqcf{rQlz| zxxSl7+ytEKw|xZ$E!=V7ek$-_3-Ae|!t*Eskh)&d1CPY~^PtJH-0FHM7UQ}Rbo=X! zG^*!83;um~v++N?-zV_28j_#>&0X#q zruyd!&|j&-zEq{XLp2xt{a;q4T$ma^2l(}%`}_Bf#d9k58&S{s@q_!Rk8>%w^|oAx z(Y`@l_Uuyavj*rN)3eJnCH~pt(x!Vmzb-=-ZCDB z1&)U<(8mRR`0Q=tp$)jsCG{i(PaLg|2Z?BZ=Fg~t+a4(EO>IiRcXyWTnb1aqpJ+cT zUf~pBK^04?vwc^=Bwj@1ND)kC0&!yv)9%5a=deaE^p%IU?slV)ORJH z=U5_t4Z z=^yh*8B_fLzD)i}pPF7vd&!-usPKp{T{coNFT9VT~H{WClK^|yW+ zKZ)%m_|pUU_k_gsRr#5RnV`#7{o-UbJ`q=>{mjF8m1|B`iFSz1kA!tq4dmkPb{pqsP%+8A{liK6|$tMvR}l{&AdVclUwJADwF{G}S-RPd#v zyw!KXbFO>DyvlLXjBy|nbYD$-_b}IABFDu~*lPq`#8nxWf11Bjoy$vsN28wSiw1Z7 zrfgorYkt=Y83&I0<0tMqrM7os0RPEugZ76h{3*aWuBQLmta-SCrvc}@lWW-}2lp3+ zeX+nZP?r6!e!F}Me-`RFFP}L-Y*2pS;{Dpmm{&OOnlTSVUX$_Y+U(T40($>*F>0Js zFfT-d{`tm(#|r9XeE6@R51fxIpr7qHd$bSt0sepRLM^p~Rh( zk8_OwRu3uL?rfRyz=PeuxxTfZbo3oE`so1j>oTR^T;KL9{Y9y%w;t9dZUD~p?Yh*C zlcSo~{hIPkz*mb3&u@9RTjiP^*Qbg9d+ZM;zE)Ite&s@|Eoj^Os`oq19-sg7{7TP3 zgWAOP9RB*HrygDr4-b#`XNTVSWAh#iJ(Z`js1))zhOy+B7dNVZpSU5t<0QBISCyx^ zA>;7F2g&1OzQ{RWPc=b2P@)wqhqylV=P?-t1Yzpn4u zzmvgtV&+fN)%_I>)~DS63S7Ut!1uq_@0y#^-@x^|9`)3}Hpi}gjHQSN-@{}C-FweF z6;bB}UT=}#y*z({I&WFQNBe&adz?d^x6Ht8D62Q0yhWW?xW1?S>RA&ysPbI_^6ULR zXR|8b0bFxS`akXQf?Vpn#Oqy-=$@0Ug+aIuemMbG3vcT>0u_HK41QGozQ4x`>E`MqQCK84omJu_VT=^qHq5Z^?N0Z zifb^kPrtYkQl|LVqu1AuEzld2qmg01_Cc1wgtb zPcnwW-iW)>Pp(hvcJDe<3?qa(iKNQu0x&(g|_+wB$KM=e^=_f(4xQ?+FlzL_l zE*RBl=yPvZ@$hStz{hxgo8xghT=B*;6?i<#X(2iCsr`)CNs&vW{52!j_fqZWbrS7= z)%d^z)&7Wkl8<=iv+sTP4~2i3&>IE1@4D7|qWBjYgL+<{IIf-8rrH+|oYyBydN1gr zjzdw9p9H#>_A7lkR|);;z*B*joL;Clb4K9&P8Z|TtJA_|s{Tychq86zWbgNom>=x- z5pEfW8B-2yWo`=j87*Wz^Z8M~clW9Bivb_+*VgS-X1>JeFs}|L33jAJ+hau|ynRMi<4fy4&k9Vr~XLwzn z3c44aORlATB5&AcEE$_ValM;!$oJS0WF08uq~iUt6!XQ#^3SxyD%2IKMc7;jsNgPlDdwGK|QbkFD|*?nb+UK zzEtRq2i?ZnU##JEx4<3rANad3I@HwR!b#wEd7(0fo@YWX z-=EPdec;C-7TJ@9{D{ZWf3EAJ8^0H)Rq%B1M}h9$jhlyuDmbtEVt`-kd2?@=f*bIi zF4~{-=Q_ny`;w?1_j?=saALM<^!0Zo9^DQRrjtv*cJmd`KUX zX@nm8I@#|MA+K!IvUc^}oA06?8|s~)i+Osc69tHNa{%Xfy`0cD$w(3>%3AJ5g!LJA1iS=_*)pj+ap8dYalX@1$UFdh)rGK=q+oNgY88d-f z!B0GX%Jh#^`)mRBH5&G@XA?n2K=7M^J5X-gJR^IAg7ZD8oFBS{^!I!3s3uGLuSfrz zmapJ0bzIQ{=RQ&Nq#hlz>tE}4L9Y>X#fQIBC5NKljC#%wM<0fD%&Fj+h`SYZ+NV|9 z=TdMR>M6hZwuRccTx2l!6rF!ao8esiD7cU=U27wBvJRs489lk|`O ziZ~lU7x|BjSI#R{I_C$Sz++HPKT8*1zq9~wVW&?YuET7&4vPohRr`a11&wdo>B7DS z&+#UKe$%5JQH2b&P?lo-k_`HcKc$@x(C<2bV{~EtoAegY^L&UK^i|6B%oC}5lRogg zgZ`P+)BX0%O58^ymxxO;_M1$g`)pI=8p?i}Z$D@#I>obpuaA$c)6Cn)J^Vg=IPjq< z8NHrp#~v0sJh<<<%9P@=pAG-jIO#&ImotECUC_(xiitm{QuWY4~cxDhy?8_qi-=i|%yU&I0rHUsB=+r@mdOI+_Up)2{V zz`5Vnt7)Sy`(ndBCT;`H{k9>49`0{8`kyGucL1M=_&ByN8e{+Lkaubp@z2D*0rPVC z`9j}>7zMYyPIVlS{&9aHa>B3wgqQ^?ah@O6|10T!jL6Z2`wK$85%or=#J~HqvnJH+ zWf$@Fo#Qrx?%;tH&B7Giih7=>P0LjzM>uei&w=M@ZJ=)vHtJLa`j^xu?d5q|2k6Qb z-4>G#bYee*?<>&&ccc8Ed4J&_!Xkm&!Owi0X`GlX9RkxyBNr9H$;ce5N;arSTGx}x(xQ*rihjizex@t%It_M4G^ zXhmarenP$;_3Ynm8&_Y=>t%uSyqFPm3z94QedpGUdiL+Uc{`m8*Gc(r>)%$;SNnRy zYF-~nYXAOi1KrHA4Ogh^6`s#^0)ITC^Evf8i05;OANaPip13EE{;36JENkL#@m#9s zP33*!hUxqF)sKje)A#c3V(Nz^=m#YX>F24p#0?wVf5dPP*nhabcf#xUSBU2i3_&u! zLY%mdo`k=@xthZX6*Ari*`6uDKWjgzJU}-1MAD>_H*A(?Skoq~F#B4v6q&^?Pd@w=IgUEKhGy?x~LGVj8o@UfD-lH#_>A`r4@hEV9Z{=?X?WK8>x91@qPTwl^R3*=pTe(9^wFK15@4txC6rl3B#x$F-UKdJwS!4Pps z1J37cMt!^c6=jNcj=}dwh%+Al8CS^5LfN3e;9hE6IgT-}s_2F$s^eIozL-!M$LNK@ zo!&N%MFEdT`Lny)M{I|;+5f-tGzD_fQ0A`l_aExG#{aXVF3+geZ&;&|Ln<=3GXB2% z4H03|kF)m{ogKCHmP3$<_K8M4+b8UYG3Nv(exiM1fivzl$G;odJ_1h+z+Y;*`t3`m z0B79Sp6j=b@%FYqa0~ixlDXmq_50{CEoI&qF%M)dNc$iR^N!%p0>26T(}MS=sPZGj zrQaOSCLCB%OqI`hg!1$DHTFWc``HsrF}}p8l4U9UP?E7Y$sG z_!b-ZQycEBdfOj3{Wv&w-Dr*l0_QkJ{oS85Il%acagooT6Q>>d^WW`5I+<-U-%_A2 z4dvyQJAPK}%|yKh_V(Ly%tJPei}b1J@2)w}^9yz>TQq zIAyAH=tK4XP8Q-|2Hm5MzZ_TY?*wW1{Bbt9f3xf3@CKvOtUmv2;N$+y_CFr5i+TNX z0OvgasABWq7z<&a3pmH&AvvZWQQK3KOZv_A=<3J%r|Nps3VuE4e*b)YPQUw4@XrW5 z&mWDZsOL8_IFA9J(*2f=-?MbwJ?y&<6U0FK1TZ7$b5){Dizr z%>NG1^{o~+hXE6~3F{j-@I22NE#_GbuRT~F>T=7tXj>m_=iOZJ$oItcA55Vdmb{-3 zm+1M5({Pc%gW~$W<+}+c$g8sN!hkPEx_BQU$clPCA2_wt`<2g)i|+t`v^L-z|02rI zJtQ#k6ZSfQv;8mMkFCe{7x9b0c{<{Z^Uala{^B?zrAc`%%F84DFP+-0huXglsAoQv zI`O{Wc_jn*O`v;Op#ThG2hTYQoa+i+FXVVJej4o*xE*|aeso6b zpdqS#PT;(LGyZkV?>k<6e$kJo#r|n=UZ%6VD4=mH+kr zE9O}X=u2D-o5)wz4&ZGT_f(twZqvyE32*??c2KO?6a zx8oEBJuc8Ky}qF}AytnXc$pJ3z0dav8iCWFh=MX6i(2o@t?K!M!aSwOw;0fAhU>j! z1m&2JXR*N7>^yh#ZT?t*U!U`;pQ@*RfF3*Oax61*+sJD#^*DeZeb6cPZF(|*UwyeR zM%Ck+MBz_lA?bJh@X`r1L5*7!@Q{W(tG!K+5qR4+&4X1v-T@E-Mck~Qn^q(<>1}$F zf$J?lKY5#;RNw_3Z7red;dyHzQ|QSA-PZ?JZ+x4cEZ_rPyzqP94D&!&SjHpjRiji@ z&t3|H9uw$3zgY1@LTcR1z^@is?0v7fpi%QJ5qRd5ZHH7nwA;JvSef*;xVeDW{B+C~RnHL$gC2dP^n1%6&NM=*9s}@6;S+g_$IqV_;PWd_-m2>H zUeH3I@Fxj$HCmi%@-{swz_ZVa^IOleeeA#s_S>{f)pL=;Jf+a%2Hl=3z0wJ({%DFw zf9J34pZ#rdiv<2;!k@n9n8oc*mc1_`TmF z8uA^$zl)u-M!lY6`?!D~KU?}9ujf?#n&Q&`UX8D{SFcy7Uk|)&F}+E>UWrHlG6J`2 z#{XMbX}?(HpBZ>Y-);YJ0Wb73|E$2T+wN(LDEv;yw*fCd>d67+{D?3A9KeTlYdz9? z@!*l6%69>8{nwrP#TEIqPg6qrf3}uucL@b&{Pe)jjjvguq=GX)jKF6Pt39fef-`<* z;3N9~`l(*Q89yuVxQ{zrEUnrt!#CKosFRS1w=szyt+cr$B zTu#C1pQa?*-@N_b@(ND-^}rLqFEF}-g0p`bf#2EMs9!||XMD`Sw-31aQJzZLkP zcax4)QgAcIHyiNK9SXW=c!$0B{^A1EFaJwP{~z``^Gg+l z-{(K@NkdL&ud3i|A0zP2+78#MDLCyj1Mjfw+$w{Db9}Y}AJE8h3&hbePyn2g+<7+E;60ReS zz+Xkr{@{HD*W-S#8F;R0ksYEHocx@>S}&gXt2+N#!DmCcy>@zd9fdyz`W?U%(mIUt zKCI}W5$((Oy>b35_2=3Ub^c7mb19nA(*IJrFZZkZ^{6*O{`@5apQ`>Dfz$q7k2cy> z|6JfRgKlr({RKaO{T@61;aJa-b3;Pk=AI3;9{q<5i0eI~|EM^ycngnTLELY!L2mor z2N#;AwD?32cyMh7>gnsH9o0@zhKNfRaQgM~qIJCLS7aF(5BjydZ;NWGUsmu(gRW(- zeL3nufsoI3q2Jrq4R6nO6Ml1z!IEo|KEo2!>uTTo#ZsVWz>@+0xY~a*n|?Y_&;8*K zR+MP3`so7B_Kyxaxt1{zc52GPPrNr^+UQ&LXp6x0z!|6eMN7V;#!1gOf^M26+AmJz zXB>YRc_W-Y3;Aa7Sy2Xs=bz0u2|N+@+kh8cZJ({?H}9iqV8>lupTcVXy1+;L`x;IE zQrCx?a?*eLcjvRk1N{60PW$t3&}?QNh<2ndmW=HnHiD=0_~F~bqi zwO?|L$dYTy-gpn*kp8bd6#nr&c+ur$JnOA06W*j!$0hJj8;^SC>6i{%=BxH50cW1h zwAP%(SPFkqfpb4>(eP6<8FPWB1J`4`i7C}_oH|ZNQa{Q$Vb2_De~m?+MO2XXPkyJc zlNYo?z6<-TQNT|$NPYPc91yq(cnt7M;e(HQ53zb^1n$PZbUg3^JBxj5RQQun&-du{ znKUPNeFabEzBcH>t@dsW6x^+mcBcc+y?0$qL*OERc<#@Ib9R}a%QOGwO7EZvT2Tmk zp8IovKBA(Oe{{i)uRm32#eao=Hqb?b?)cng8ykU6;PI&EdwS!ZZ(iBhC)!_Le$y&=67Yy9>F2-$cb~>6 zcogb+ZgYS4AGbGA@EG8HPT+8@g(sT=7xA>E{HVpC*qNebE-+8 zdv$A6SaZ;M@L&_y8Y!3eD9#ZodI~st7S{6{VB4N zj04YQ_I=eSTD>mhxl77FeD&WQ>bUCQxoW(h=lv3ACaXBl5hOy-`m&!~Q|Fx&)bqY- zwlWb3_mG-5*ACc;m_Q zUXkx0Kkn67s9vY@++_^#MPnWmP_NT@UyFFLE#D3G!?8}}efOh{uKTUSQX!Y;0{fkI z?NQ^&`%&qjYuF(4pc>C4)Mujfe1}uZFPhuJ zG20^sa*j^T`%*ox6OVe{f82X-dtSEZ+u9=u^q(z@_Pv+?ZS9c?Iz#G-2I{^G{mlS= zKh#lK^*0OkjK_#vjd!d5@|+;sJ70_7iE4XCS4O-bXGGr3P1N>`1N`AkWe~A)fn3YCL$JE)8@E+4}n4?aM z&b&L7+T(^QpZ$&U_nnyfp(>x_56`i@S~>Hf+Mgn;O20Y&?4R`SeKnu6pg$UPVfSAR z@be$_wEy4r%x_8@>|o#{RDvr z*IH1|^9k4)PCtiJ@Z!M_+x^49w`z0ZqWTOqTP?m zc_iO?AUp6= z;K{%%)@fN;JuhTOJ;%*CDP`mSf9Hjqpm&sO)s}kL?js$K5zO8q@g6jUVA&=x^JPQ~9*6+P^X7E{2)*3OYxw`)xh4Ie@d|HVL zht&ONj&q#HdYL-SRrB2iKAxAU`fKoHHQzNg(4Ng?UN^~qIFFj|JTH@ub;G*brnYK- zGlHMzWfn}BQCZb*2F~?~<8Di%s-NdqD8FckbvfmW`%L%QSe{bc&vHOso<+rcM+Ut8 zE}!(n3B23-aaV>h5Htx-tRMv{tBG?;mP2?|Jk@d)p&Bh)eiis=W{A*Jh>n41ipRx zg@S5(azES+{OkIHnO=txBrn5BFmYz<=I%=r48r;eM|P_}<1p z+%LBP&($?yrMm9oet9zR*2!bQ!<#46ud6Nn&$%x1EXNHYpZnDY;JxQmxTB62+>bT^cXaJjK^-r+A8i3%bKjsr z>Ucr>l7WBR=AT#UctHJj;GuPb@2leh^TP?e;>5by3L}Bl{Br}Zar)J*$hY9S_oe?o zA3NW&h=S981MrSxceYgTM@1n1Cg3wx9f(lxM=}2`z^8{)>8{?7^7#+^RFe&R)ca9v zA3N}^C3W-F`%%mfC-8C)SM*cwNAZ4&8~CE}#i#2P|7f2sTKd2D{?*#072KEqz^lAl zad{a9C%*~!F9$z4Tvox^|17{WToFH)Q*ho7NCv*Kf6}KO3eJ6LH|UnW_sxVT1?PS)_2)Pg-b~eRs3YUT{m{odll<<7>42M1?&w|Z z`$~#@?z>a|^hx2ds{G^t`K}&~5>)>z!0jmKwzr&lN0CqesQ=-sj9ArwJ@!4Re@C9I z+^T;1ud9pv@Am8iRlfoCR>)aui*BOIcf&3d=&pAeH&Bf)_nWD|=jD=9RsG4}V|=eW z`{hve+ktam_uk=wdsY1w;7*h$JO5orjX(EM6AMfK-Wg%~UY(zGAIN$O@}t4r0^`;E zbVIHIbVXll}wW7%?~ZyGr}mF#lSBf0NlUw6cO*fhPm+ojQA)-~CA7cHpD; zG_9}Rk94A*`>2z*4Q-&_k91%?kW1XX`C*#nk@P)+pV4t{-=00jH zuDcANo9NtEllLV-?zfN1?-`gtzazOvN#3U-W)5HR65Cv}Z%3 zdEvnd?f{<)WxlP83%3NWwr3>vD>WZUzpIWezo?a7mZhYeh_ zA$?*y;NrX8_JHrA3P^k}HR}(_=LVndV;Kj5d)CLnQOe)K4t^hy@9lZiv7{|X5PN=} z@*l1#S%ynUlQ43Gc#7Qnmq(6ozaSCvGqY}G|6%23?~+L9Nj)yllQUo6iywSReO}rD zKE79Q(aei`xKHD4FW|J(g}+}`A2vJ`Hn9-;Vu5Rn(*KsJ6_192K;YbOG5{~qG*2jf z^WeVkXPo`5ZaEQ;s-Kn4uPb|Eg%IJvgDl|V`z5w^81r3&D)qcWn81^P^ZgR{duElL z`(q97tvey#4!j|3I?$@m<&J+{_YR@LUng+-%W>dE^6W`$AFv90LL+o&ckopmH++=h zkI!FyeHo9=@t^Kxo2vE=#lrbP1s`w-~ZJfLq2Jb6?~&gpLy$dW9`5f zJLjGcfo|as`Lha0Ije{3t!!t3^E%WG{+=$rL@x)$1b@+Q|-FJNifEzD$TF zBERe}Y-=azM2Lj{d{3JJaxOmKQd#v+*HHRR`Ts6$<@X-?M8uWtdAZ#AU#ZJ0AN=e; z1)XsbYJ4rg({jr=boy%kL{&fgJMo++`!!OpkL}=Rf4^!NGDmG+z7Np}x(YGBH=}-! zo&UYB>3Q$$Cvm;|_vzVdP+ZG|5lAU-;ql8iPU$|8@%gK=^Tw&9D&DT(!L>1{XDmW4 zl-W)hA}(%|^p|$`$-An6YIi*NlTe zMm#cs*V(yygwl^g`F=&lEu>=VMpb{*r_yioyN~u?uJZFa+ZfO_P8fDi?HBQ==Xhjq zz9dEM7ks~B66g%wuH07pMJnp~e#KVdfBW69i2$CC@>H8MdUf9*nf?P`S>@UQb>F}M zJfe~Gvq$wd2h@E7_8X3aW%kTysQMoRKK9#A-yPYZ_FKLuoc!jtQ@g4BN#N(c_SkI0 z532D?EhO9Djec8gOF@IWZchb&I?CvgLz}Dd%|v|$-VfYi)4xO2_{IZ|Xe|AIH}}b+ zYW(PbWT)(z-uHSopQo(P6 z{1SE3yD9$p=EckCbd%Kj{DkT z9?OJ&j(bs{`+ASrw|}Sh_jLLTI(Kt-4>cb2R|kK3?5xvB?XM}|<2-XVarpr?A0jZ1 zus=-e7|XDljB2F z|Du8OKFF^1cO4x2M7(2xXBLy~?Ht$Vg)*M_zQe$E(uDVeE*)Q#_>IsZ>`MVZ*GUDI zotrpe`k0Hv(|~iGWUN;IuPV2`O#~jC0lWl^x|E#Qtmc?*-H4mfiCuF)x`b=9$Y^KOJI*Hw|tWPGAgR$9AlRd$6x7WK40w%#W@a{%}B zC*OPM5B9;4I*!k)K;mJZo4&JJ&nq3Hz9T?7ug1e^F5Bzd;s!U)P5B7StG4yL!~3kGxwg z9)4|X3mF&Y=f#j}Glg#P^U6oNFh6qqHvXe*dN1t7nSazjx_rztb$m;K{4|tJ9I3^# zEBxFSApa@b_9lw`p7*av`?63DUh&cC9N<^;GqRcqtGql>_9#5 zr=KeN_a%XepNO*yIP-e>?0X9+Q^+?Bmg9&^FUxz5FS=P?ePRW_R^LkcPo86amhp1S zD_;ZLh*GyNt%|xXF{7USpvK%S%LH1-q=P7?bY?Z4LJMBu1^q%}Lc5o4zcBynei>>&J=dY7UOin<;58n^ zaXD?3jOV5Um#ZASFrgCTX#qd`#gL##-ahiiGZ{F?ZGG={_0@6P4xI7WTfFSeY_Ii) znt(e|ezS4@Sbld(yocBJi?oaKv$#G1eY5lj-xl)7V|xp`MI8BFPF^?bTFdw>y?8g2 z_m>2%_=$E&gWMRzd|%_tk)vjNdKcz3S8`y znUudp9Fnifct`h@<=^X8tYB=#I1`C_;#TngRIuGz_9G!%{KP(8Y{2!sEkK_O?^&n3 zPC1PusLxaW!!9MZ>g@jD_;s)D}P>wvJng(zwjcBH z+b{c6R@c>L@Nt}7_Ux0CTOpk#~%y(bTXVo)#nU%$`G z{FTfDuDfQq9jj~pxM+g&dl z8*Ke=dgo${2cTbGeDGJnHh+4N$9#?`vc2?sYPX`1A)phu8*w)-k@BqPs_hA~OF4e_ zEt5FUcMUtU{DWZUoBEs+BwgZiSHj z-xb4yk3=YV3UKC2j@>WrWK-}o;LM|OPW$rg3Z4O+>-YK#J}jL>!Lxv~UphCAznxRT zBRfj}*{=)!_-<4#1-GCbqd~X$pRf;d0~hU`^0~~vB*Zxubno?=5uGQXy#;+D=&fka zM9`0}I5tS<(D?lXeJtqXAwL!L;i-G$@*?lZBF9g;li#GzLjTM}zmEp}-qPCX1*~tW@qL>l&}X2G+1Wg{Sb%;(Z-D$5+TB_D7r%Y#Z^b!luzB$K7*&1@)%yBIV z?PdbKW5w}Yxgl4j=eWjk&F@MQ4K@}wzDXZA zt{Fg|ULbg1q~T5az;Vb7`unvWGXAi8D4w2K`-dUIHd0({a44K7)`h)1>;B>N?y~Gj(@W>LXN86vrZ0=Rq93m zOmyw^f+J&+l6>eowFEc}iQn z?Hi!KWaEevs{BO6pW}bljGnEzZt(J>{oRoBa>zfWxLy#ru9x(W`EmAC@AV<*$D)4) zwyy#7Z5QU%FwQa>vOS!%7jy|pzt&OW9jeFqCFXkrW5qkFzc%nOpG&Uzuz~8Y6}SUs z?opkGsqu87p6$`BNu|}{O1zU{pQg9;yJpGvA|iml&0js}ZVhi+g8NSN_igk>(EpVC zOeO9)kY0>0f%z;jk>^h2sRjHtlmZv~ENRN$o_PJ|_ubkJ>*@Jy#R$*#YQvs<`Lw5< zgX}>v&od!sbHAPsMt!)&JL7n8ZDb!A54OeAsJPFCZt)X&lJZdUM}uxc>GvO#R^Ucl z=Myiz>RY#p^F5S_;NSaBo$J9;ypXR=ZRp<*tIn`=0W9@{FAZhICsi{-Ui16jn??Cc zBOm$pI)r^0;LAd}^}}OXT7^Fr^^tKh4w++S+z5S*Yi-f~_Pr>7Xq#$ZH27js4oxWZ zPMDA1vyT=qjwOOlka*(spWi_r;cHK7^R|a?pF9n6UjF;u;CjWrS@pl<^-dUU={cgm z=g`O74Th#fKe$viySCY1=<5Oa!oJXzT z58l_~FLivfq27%0#V;ROI6evcA}adl;k{?K{PNHRKI$(t(ODx%FFg?UJAiBArJqgA z#@*_DC_U=gPFZa(?^5qGalT?ZRgBB`otg(`@Ef7$t8ZH!Rr+}-`v>h?RR7DfihaKC zo7*5~@aNt0v7N>GAsX>dLFoWp=1*~hct2TsE3Zc~k&m?31^Vx;PYVPr4@LWjT7m2O z%lP!z*(G;22oyNmm;RN~4Dj`Hk%u`z%aU`zusBP?uo3NEzwF&Z=aJ{@$5!Y|S)XI` z=27pp5MqS9T#(0-XGrP~8Imw^Nbk78aYKA(w}d>7^G?VcUv6MN{lHgFAx7Yu0n#t` zJ2Hl*XJL-(Ki^{qT#Tk?!s3BE%a9;1Xm^w$A-Ps@+)wquf!=N`0f)YFE- z_qWVZ{0WUMEBm8vpo~l2r5_}cR@lpZVB*ieY>`LB4d64Oe9>ly-}erp%K6LxsZ(4R zmEQusWRyn=AJ62x=Arw~?-{op@%r9{8V4ujEV|OZ`@Rjkz2{qm9Oey6=BIeSjpw=M z-Xr4rFf1A&FAH)a2g$e$TM;^IfAf4}1(65W#-QFK+xx5YdF6iiua{qgxThjt)>Lks z`0~fl`hrIACk61k$JF>v;SWs(&OEWjOpailc=$u(fv2PVV^PvD#!cXM*q;f!+XmAY zobNq0|5FgkSQfzFvY*EFX&E>Ajg<4q_4S{q!7?r{iZ(vDq|I9IHG}ZWjCzj_@6Xb# zZ)f~h_#J8mPQUbN*A}aOMF6*Py^gngPJ(r(&!?yE&JRQvS6Y2Uw{pM9a)$G96oSD;>E{M+Jg2L8>q&J`GUum7m0 ze=BYm@LMPFys`~+D>^K>uK4FWpX~s?tVqspIp=$P`p@qW4;%S<7m6qEOE`9o~N>R*h2(aQgA%z=n4j2Vnjlh5Sr>|BQBCnNlK!`7Lk< z_|qZZnDF7Re*OX1puDnm+c?!f%`oXV^>-RD+M13nJf`dn}o&y%Q{-DS6`SzYgfjcKeFeVftqh z^DGnfl>P3F^4`7;Jk$m}Vz`V)n+E#d*l&a#j0sD|aQMjHz2k-tPZ&mHJf$ZtK6_#y zZ)s|UQv1s4Z_=Jb)YG09t6knTN}xR{pbHyqX-0cQ-1%N;#;y3sUOOmD;A!B?K)LDQ zimy2ydHGSFg)(|plSsx^;G8cbN62{8J@@1}+d$yasHc7T6E~bz^Md^%7IfJ+G@8P^ z74f7kEa_V-C6FFHzV&bl)fy}&fjhmI)5&3t%W$gFQU0Vt2T9rcqRj9 zdyO4hr2*Sk;CA3_kET-^cT?NT37qjZo+#uwy&`{t-wmAYz3YHkqsCi9{iCIS*2F*K z*yja5^P2IlIH2<(=C#0?4}2fUl}h_gs`gtTm+jG|Y2!(%{U+eaDDO47l%H+l^*@0B zk*!!+ww=H^UzpME(MydjRsY=JryU17+RM4^2?>$%T66d;XNd z`_=JFGe-K){xtjjZhr60(*x)J&x8%1wB~s;q2CPoM$qM&vSl6j@x*>O&rLFZX3#C( z)o~5;O86>%LY@)wtf2erpNI3*{Ia7R?Z7{YdaoyQK=7M@JAv=$bf7YGMd0ke%3@(zgpZb zRQ2Bgocy7$I#p5qb3?xgbfr)Cs;;&V<4^mYra^Yqe#V#fuiWx#F#D$P&knilZwbo| zFIDqB8MqVWu`_4dsrlnZJ>}1=(A4k!J{&(y@MG!k6?&`fV;CpnLpx4iIk;AB9~1Co z@c)=msJiN(g*cucSo6`JAFK9p{4{|7O2xn9)%e=MPy4&*KfkNm=LF6;hF;n|PqmNl zZ{v9MmAP9@HNLv>(m!AO2A%f%F0UK%4WN72@2ux;xcrIsNd|5LzWL8JbJ+eKJ^#7y zG$dg}53%O>ulFh^L*A-GwTAsWJMkvQiy#N;`Tf8}W1~KfpTDpVaIK3t)*EBG)#q!8 zz2l8$g7la1=+xoWUNs(i;EYGj6*+sW`DTH9Bj|ppr?so&jSlfJ17G>#@Coj>t`T-*0p~c70$cZuz z`VUQMIw9Qi6Z{7F5e>Xps{@&NCG5qmxSos!etFA8Yd!_n15X4#uk)yW`Bfa(^So}~ zvZQuH=7`Xr2EI(tok@)-tL9w>aJKW+S9KdP?*u=`Iqr}2n>DEjV=nN>Nz(6h$e%Fc zSHI`{qk(f@<<6y2yHx$Lz^T9Fz|)gd{T%1GZ`WYIHjQm9^rr;y?P0#8F3`s8Gk+CKCz8hE{_+pnnh@%o4M&1*fsmpZOz zfiH53^fPb8q;S>#Xw;Mcr)i^ysQPtShcbQ}8V_2h>Q4;dkGNU!mMT95IM=aHmQ84{ z_OCSHoOgQ6nzc>sU$MY5P!?YKd=tlU&zSiC8)t{d4eIM1i9G$#H{V2lDdS+<8qy;u zd-8fg;K8*<)O%!le>Iyd<1ptP2hG44r?BDGW|CI)^DNkB1zp)9Nv+iRBm?bW18!Z> zri415q#%DCz&rG4xP$YFkRJ`)1$@L8P0Oj{xMr&Ki|@NuW(aY7HeQ>B*q zeNQ6TYO%-dRC}DL*I~bZ zXv8m<)p)sqGoC9n)hem>>ZVD5c^{&8| z?)`7=L*JWs@`#`j{l|)W`ns@X?gMd2r84dXLpu15hNUx4F2D}fN{I!FQbX3P_BlyfHM{TwYV{E_&R8FnRd$a;~pgyvz%!`@hHq{4UVVtbFV} zKCdZo8}E)V2R9jP8Pq>+_@{{$abWL1&ox+~=cA~i^EVzm5G}-c?9is8o_Ta)`^yth zCGgNp;JlC4F0a!b3<7~id?o$oKF^K!`>YJXKq;P^wfC2}ZGbGzkQW8M1}B0K6!XZV zej!@y|L}Z{8T>JzZ+5FzAwG`^GrV>hL1zWso(&Ira^WuQw4;F5>JO^b5ecm75Us*=S z2+LBmOW--EOwiZb^|De~e{%0R_`vgug2a0sJ5Jgc`L!%#Pzqd}Q#C7pi}7BQP4-hg zN{;u9T%(hN-?a0M=ZcacuU_lhZNz$!Z7cK%dyEDA&m%b${i6N&-af|P)$*<(NH4er zzvsHDl(diewfOY;2=)AQRsbIL?T~CLZki?IK>2sZO{t^imjSp1<&)h93aR;(jC$r* zjRwnCsrkk09Xsf1L>TIXB7cPawlAgsv_E8Iqu*5f+~A{qbz`pns@kVZmiAMB<9)}g zsP<960d)53-_%g;i!SXSztWR;cUSdWz(@V|Lw66V`jZ3nKVBD_<8AuwpgTOEc&e&j zXO;f*`KX_>uiqSG^fs@zecj+=eD=NDzfdr6bv>f{M#h2pd2jvjE+L?k()^!0raS}q zYG#e}jSHj~?L+(ceAkcFri2HXB!$3}sTc31*wpF%&%wY|`|PB{x-47sLG?pGM|~yh8|XM1Sw4r=>4!N>OK_`UX>V1?ff+>LU0t%hqO z6kIpQKmQLb`FKG#6`v^mXZy9e5L-@dKNI+ApQ-4UwroEUzlid(e^@}*snmnoY&W&N z48W67zNm7ub#~aH!B5a@%1C);w5uKThqUHZIWR7eUg&os|6QQdJUF={C+Gxj02YR^5|)aEQLHBW9Y%d_4wiVM>q5_?MV{6*k=Az<;o12^UkH~9I! z1O2x$E~*^yzJqAgOa3?KIqMYJP95_!KOdqKRIh)c9Rux7guE|a%<=@^v&w?VgKPEkq`%H}GVcd3s>#c1f&0cY z_P0HSPnK54do%c%4|Pg)9Ki8j_|5A-E9f}h{`TqKD31FySf!^t8~CaX$?=s|PfA$| z`;4?7<;I(#zUS2hu9*-2@Sc*L#zvYj$npAz{?7i~Irq!@>Ud)WKmEV7zuetm<7@r; z9_XK-8#$xvgAm{%U)f*CZw1}8jz?B-UX#+~dYb*+34d&$Z_;z&oKQU}Whv~}19zef zxp2H|IOx1M##6@g;H(qDK`Ndi}dciOHm!_c1 z_xO6U{TxPF3S8(VuF4U7(F?){rE2I_ln#X61Iw; zh<{o@{Pm!hxM#eXD(#>@&-xjEpg$t+f%+`qPq;PxC}ZbU=J`j&Jy4(2MDg(S|ph($6E^egHIfBu3$Zddp{-+Klvoi~@1~8d<}bf#@uP9{Q`naTe&*|z8I6*duL9?OTq@{(j2yR(aTRzv>iK@*Q(I0C zWgdvQzj3__`Y*no9!fh^d*Xpdd@tirwsWaJnGZr=H0t^M(&D_A)N{GM_n`kVA$La+ z)1nt28L|v5uOgm7iQwn^3x6p+s`&IH=e*CNc;pAA0O$J)9}iqyU}(qn{lFib2D}!G zcK=oHqYB%aEf;?Ze=~ryy}AFpvq7#-Y-6x$gg>#M&q7&y^92+45k(#b=7-dy)kGmq zQHy1qVp3%O$KY>Om$(0;UhsSLYLhzp=f&r9yL<29N<2hk4#-Pe0Kc`ZKmV$b)t?Gp z@e}e5QT}-8t;df`RE|F`%KJgu|F}=94zyYD$2aol-(J05Ih9`zJ|oIzC69IF_$lJb z_uQI+kD9+#&weg&?l*A!ue*AU-}kf(@lwAA{C_7rdsne9)P{No%5K?nS5x)7P*48D zA2lwj>gV;m#wPu*T;}5-EgTf~#eXN;llDb!v>8?XM(|Pp^$oMnEBdweV*c^#y)0)- zHGXFBTTzDDBATf7@&2d{c>435lU4il)Q?gdSIX}`rxpIYfSU(>Q(x)F+Nf6k_Kl8O zFVdmd`DXB2QT{ULRSDI94eD(u z3#DZFoi}BEY2e>--3;H_U$mbKd=B814|N#A@lN1;FE{zWY&%w`#+UE6qyJlMv;FV? zEcK7in$IV$Qtj6RH>2GBWxaKZer-l2|M*<4xp|)&A6tO@^o>pZ&Z{^A@Q)4a5|#Le zT7kPzW-ckEQ`$c?CBJ`upY5^1p|-DnnZJKd<7Y2a`5NFxl;g)vDjg07M0_>SYX<(? z`I~Nzs~$c7c|XbX5MIKNesRiac<*@SyB}+Vyaq>q&RQ{ez&fGQqfcwZdraxWrc!rD ztMO!>vOVpyDvc+tus5cdjE8Qy^xJvN>ybWE={NzUupavFfiC^ajusY<YCPYQb_xDO$V)-_YF@JnNV1N=ucUpZZ)Djx?cvlggS5bFKlmb3rN4b9_bJTxpNo8O zV1GIpWi;p(+}pK`*Z=g#OON~Dq>lytxU)+uv45)c(V*wKfF#f#%U)Q^`_rTs`Q{GD zw=~cT8sSg$*V0e=v*ew`r;0yef&N6Slzv~_^wE&F_!H&`@FxoNZKrRY^cH`@0{w{v z{qhyT!GZpWaUswj=|_kr6MiLuKMke8#kk;9{uX}oeNK)uGEbUcot-lxSy0QkaQ$aK zEAa=hpCoCm0+l$gyZAo4d*Q9G1Y2I?##J&-+`n2_r_J6F1=j;Nql|vq;c}?;HNOV+ zR+KyEm70_d_KCcSI3evaWysP7x?RJzt;r5KQku8_hwG0^x=fS~(4YJMSkoM^OQqL< zj(O$=y{+NDpXM}^QkKFV*D=_E_SdhL{tql-{3(~|O?ujII|V;LzyCn>?YWI_(g)ga z1^wB6NuT90yh$Huza8}7KfjTm`{?9)oBb}(cN)<=V+ozx82vKkYa6R5je7sdJn^wV1 zzcU`w)Y=}v4 zOMcC1sh95|-QIO#GxhzWeBRWwPU<-@KR!0t`I_Gxz`ybN=*B94GWhs@Q%x~zd6nM| zobNZi)}+Op5JkQdINxtNvS`hgS_O9lr~jo6-(=7x_3azer>~qaZ?*VS z&3ER5Vb03g!Ee#ed>i}J{Xwupa7%vu2I(KilVKUPkA*nAuvb3&1K(5LbjG*Yf?Th0 z_6IZMoXPj}_h1EQe;|LG1_QoU`EB51e|z!ojT|b!132yPTVqh05JkQVIQvWb)pe;_ z1=nnp{xLq!FDC0k72FDbJ?IjO2mKbN;MC82Ui49p_f-96@G*X^e>>bp)o%sP`DA5* zO1D(~#{b9Idj~dIegET0nzVsZ2)hg+fIvY;K#;N{2o@YfWt3^y0U2Rw0fDf~4l*pr z2)hg+?8-9if{e(r2x8e~M`V;Cd~^H zr+*lM`sMsJ!%h!)+lH*{!tV`M;h_9gt{2k5|8?J&H*1CwSgJw4A>0Z%j_=hz?~M$TaDM-z1^wh~zE3*HR?=Ia9wcoUv`>qR?4s#D4N!q*4s z;Fqc1v_&y{cD}N|7JJzLE$U9LIPS>@`(%=4e4DMg0t`^tzysxmN&gp`@PeQVEkp6hZ zbxE3}kM^TX`Neu6Oo*tse_tzjqmCMWQ~vON6xSQ`i-^zP)emR;UJd!Hte4c&@8){Q zSx|Dl4*V_0jrNz4aGvD-{X(0r74|Z(b-fV28_(+H2=CH&G)74?+gzGA#KD-PLyH;)DXk6*ea@&3NBM#Mis5&wAb*Ed~855-;iyLmF??Io+W=Gbw46nABPqMk5SBIHt0W=eKYo*8xvzu7L{KS`Q_IJ63D z6K)YTQ6BRBOFW+1vHl#gedI(ncx)HNHMkx^J*Vs&PH4a*+==tN-ur%M5lxtcyMgok zviZ@n3R(&0{TwfN-BjhD>m=OyM)ViXiwm<4-3l`a3#on|L#EIiz0k8eB?~Cfq90^ep-w3{w<-lLn+M~(^yI3kG{Vwq9UuYYf z+sMr9`pwYq1%K`1DhZK>?0n_^v1+e~!^WF=>*ev&xxbMljVnotyf%R^aR2;;{SMBb ztIfW?CdbnOKF71kx0~~GJpJ+3rszWZd8v~vSCDQxs69N8=lmP`YsHhCcZ8<{=X@H_ z>zzb7-&FgAe>|U0YIXiQIp2)HIp0<+ozg+hH#2a~r$0}O+9&6mi|qq%X2RxTdgKe) z$NLSOuTz^e9TXxDIRo15bY!8Oa{N5NIldDnZxpwfBb?)Y!A)pMv*X^YyN(QPNtqgj=DX*OTwIR9BJZ9l*K$o|!s6 z4wK}~z+EUGpZvV6R>E07x6i8DwPwru(;>(0JEh*Ev9f*-aFs{IVZ)k2i*(R0k8k=} zA`gw=JuBS&YPeOzf&caM!?{0myv^V*s!>+U?ZSL&eYRU3O;G7>FPQ3p` zm?WPLyUpNrx^M5Qm2j5l{xQsZ*CoqaA?HBZDDSRaI>=KzmE)-kyo#sFea8Jjg@fYZ zfju7Zv_qy(<+umpy!fG`M*uxxf3M*96|s;$JS3+slIU z?C+GZy$!i6!a%Cu1^eva^{0oGy=nyB1x@lc;JmNf@UMXn%aj@DmNFg#obShbRAx?N&%VdJ&!&k3o}UE# zN5TgsU#?C#dWrrYtx|`j;y&UnKM%jf4`|c)YJ(i#rEUZ6E}8!|5pc+QqK_c&8=T!! z?{be6qL3b5>vPF=wHeT7Xij>p&~vMG-@6^pBn0g7*P~6udA4Koo!!e=p6cOHa2Wxx z&wyV2_|4a3Z*&h~XDamlx_!;TD;0j3Npz~mr>JLM@rnF+Dd9REcML~`o)<&rzEvAZ zTKv9fhI}$g6L{TDwy4L~D}w$1)m}B3M)d~U%K?3_fBQSSn(nUviR|L}kDp6zIP7R! zwMnR;JW|?~3OysVcUEeQ!KwoPp*X}35&bB>p;*_~Ym`804P$|y31e{kL7yd3aMmfV_C*@T#@+bqP z5xh_SsXs3wM(E*xiJyt_#sa<>{0`gV-qlAlQux1;ac74Z&09|7 z13#DH0-q?9H>@uPzYm^h6F$9arQRnP_kqvjctW9O4~idq*dMsY@SBJOk1u<#R4^1S zP_R79vwy7r`y(&^ZdkN-;1&+5-vW8oA9rTjBKP;L1Ft0T;~G0~eg{Lzl=s~oUhWP2 zd_(daZ`S|x=?_0osC79oEEDcl=-=LVYWF!C$^>4CK>EGFBgtU@@qY6g);!Ppx#<6X zT${cwwBKv4`@dF+IQwy(;Y4V^elbN;T<#Yp;PJ?tq>`q`oY(&L4ELda&KC>#FH0^t z5uQC?!kyrAzSzNkYk6mKMD~0MH-XRj;sSqPfz~VaihQB<59bT_4-p6d_mz+bUdXFX z3cm>ttbe4x1K0VA=RPv|c@aOK{8sKy@$)8!T2Cp1kp2wFbN!=NPfC&NPX(_3UHBD!{q7}sABy)?V}LL5{yK`Uzx@^c&+j|* z>e{_0FNEcGv_a3Ta$9G=UOo9o5oe7y7T=$7;=TV#N39|G?1r56f$;ZX5!C>VJu8kJ zXU1#1d+xc6dm-;b*=f(IPr|a~wR(J?hT~Xn=AKbo)+mpq#AF z{jt1XWyg75mlf=nIe_<@sGXcFkLOZv=tP<}hk$pbk+>cs~ z_~>Z3B+v7Mak22PfBl!ErS{btz7psCIUhL6TfBVhiHh`F&WX73e(0<^Th7S)p?2VG z-;NF!=Scc>Cg4t#)w&$GCFQ5ijq|*p*QD*8zH)wX`+31DvhBlEIlt1!i*b?dD=>Ob zS=m0`2W0zh?d`fs-cL827yg-0mR!{*MYf;ow*X(C@!1H;er@7sq4BFyYQ{>0G7vu} zH`RGMy2mj+OPu547vhy=AzsG>@0)NoR8in&3v-6ef z0x$Rj%bCLS8M5=0>jG7ph(lgyv)e@HeovCLzEQ3V=zL%u%kwSdtybZu6@SZmXdRn? z^FpsW%z<@8s};-p&^bD&J(c#QK(76zt5LE};?uf?pEF_18&Z$|dJW%yW}M{A^u>XT z!f#$HGS1(7HUj7KB*%x}A6+bPI!AUSDb`QEJR%+f_df@U{dm5Qq455(!S_s4UZv&} ze8w{k;&0>c>-H+IFDQ?bQGY7RW8Xg-=JzUa5T1$i#-U<7YFjlj_5~Oxb zgk1EWB0hY55{tj(cu>1qa9+rVW!*P`aoF2e)F1yQ&kT*?dXMaMfyd*`Tl2UfY9nb2 ztSf`-;&%teP?rNsG18dKK{6cX)2EPxLU$ib&V+qP@XsDIQut3wY<7K9=m|^d>wJD za9(*l<$2Hp-kNv!4&d>W`b#{X153Xz{7eV$-#Y7Ka#}B?;5+v!@Kl$D|Ap7TIip-J zk^UIGH%0$S=r@7?*XzSwbD24kq9lGg^1(U*;{o{peBb5k+}X#w2>xEY6Fl2@JXLPKeg5l;(X#rQI2Xl_g8s8#sxm-*LqX^8|pZc7WwG` z&iNIw`1~M^gr@`N{K@-itutW~uDT-Z=luJvO#4hNaKFFd%J>_>Up-OVBQjRl!T%Cp z8GkeQN8;;$ohOEwq9ndD{&w*5c-!aAA^zEa{{sKh6JO+4#-GM9j=$V4G>$nC7cb;_ zoLBuV;vw^C9E-+zvYhh3gZq4VJWj$mHa7Qq8(;skw*me)qJ5bk4}D{2eKajtHw1{U zd|oUO{Cmq|I`eNVte^5M9(l%gr-a&@?fEu-Zm{Ay=LxNmHHnhiMfrT2K3&9R@RfVr zbhHqV4&p2AjRpTo|1aP0yu%{YE=qd|qjt%F-8RT`Y?AOd`$v3g7dOre`LKxSULwx? zyb`}ps_X1d!RL^PO9#bG`F;YQq>ttgeqNgUPt7SOPpRQQ;k@2AUls9Lxc^2!jf7iP zit{Z0eBVEnWqB*)94O=R6`d6Zd5Wvj9~XFcS1s`=^MK;2^oRVUxEdknLCNbeAO2Rx zRew#`E#&?4NK-Lh^L>x}yxf3d1;3VMiBEA=l@#s3Se&F!zTcA9E*zhF%dcGJ_>lj~ zdXu1M)uJ2wl>LnSSJo@+_dm}IIS)$CD>HPonL3*Sbf#A1OFBHyPFD#CO47UVo*7f8)AiV1zM* z?jJY&{a(R0+!FDc>;CZ@J;o`PBEE8cWCnji?Yc|pH!n4l{UzmRf+Fwj;1iAVjN9LW z_jDX?v%mAj%nt%LJ5YXjz-PUq5AGPxRRr1}xEX$ae5XM_ZXdtB;mY`_ZVUgeCsc{n zWshIDGJZzzyZraEU$~KL7A5Id#?J!&XX{#BjmRFqZ0j2b_@ADh5%{hn`$;uWzgNbO z&Qn}n@Y@afbd-cszt5EZrZ}@+W4P!~k?&V*yLI)39zvi0ItBlahgRKl-oy?N#!1 zQYvunrzJ0+sGZYwQU-X>x(sICS8LF zb4c}paV-XMO+j2Tz;7~S#DV|ox-$KR&>wwI#A|%_yBGhj>q_XKQa(_<%&i(nsvRxm^{XGdd=VRCS zSD$cy_qTUA_t$9b6Q+RQb>QR@I%l@_4(I;r#P1qu;4j~vUOU{8ogagK%D;o?ABcGL z@LG(#AI(x^5BJv;j3cq&|MJnT3(9?Iif=6Hw}ChFRnc>~r1(0qufpx~=7)2WxxZ3< z><`$Zo-6}i4x@Dfl)FR$J|QmQW*=Q-cHb(t_K4{(Zya=b_d zf8NWK^HK3!lPHO=94|7!H`i@x%o~@TuN*I;ABnik-m$cEzW-w%gvX0G@MpF+b~MCf z*U$SPJYFP#|3`GknfbHtLuFehB!gewQ2B!b`p|V2trK{>;CY@bpzFdkj00(q=W80h zPxvSE>AJ{>^CVAs!oL^t{>Q=EHM+A5;a2dupN~j87NIecw2*fI=YAeB`&MF@F#wZ( zZFKI?aje%DT_fai%maDOizg9L1}J+c*5w^Xj}m=FgJ| zE5;WW^ccY(Q09DRzTZz+EB1v98ZrNIJj~#aAMjJM&fo4F8jG zz1<^x3q(A4-`oZM+%t{r^no&2Kg|>Aih05dKGjcok%E0I{=J{hQ{3aQUu=Ag{{P8$ ztK_)H;yl~^&34sGzF(QzJsvp6{b=`tBjo$YxZQYu$+KbEk81Q&l23v>w`;H2@9fY> zcnWaNo3M6&)C~hp{ae`%Y2aVqI&dBBZ-&OnpU1#6QC6y5uC&h2<9Nh>8JdTK+o-3@ z@kmnGQ>NB?dt`fU|B5)Wy{2xftI75%^B@uYUz<<5l9Ro0tPkb97t^0e_Uh7bp5tFP zYR0_qEPsOg6^vJ^yX}m;o{xSa>}9-jJKg0lQ!pMnqfX>G6_$u#Q{%5 z*>cO5efT<6mgjNmz4q_4lg3G1GUQTG#tr)IJ87RF-0Kqgn~6ANfcM=$p2B)N3`Ifx z$D`Qa);|+|A1Quhc`j=Xe8v8DEchKN<*&}apR*L{SMC?v!0$HN-8a(AOi_~mnaJlP z@Sars&6`Kc=NRCrz@2{#%Nr%(892}JJFgu%kmq^QuYVreKhJ$}{b4@HlfBA$AO`%H zDu3)W#D>~SeC7BP2Y!R6^&aPs2_1ikuk8N`;LpqadT)W~?0n@skPQCY(`V8O>O=W7 z&htDVk9#!#t1xb*K|VPDXNq{p{J{K=^W-tbjo&NI`@xMG51+&`H2;_s*QHj4ybtds zXZg6>s|sYv`}gn0i@asL$6v=nzE8;euG~N0ow_-%#*mda>8Ow25C3_yNgcGnDee}$ zUyk*wUI@RN<%;jm`?K7-ZeS{P(NZE=&7w@FnKeu~7Q-_JNd>ZiRSHiz~ zjn6HV>yO2GzJDUWeoGO5ZwefK{n~_NQ9rM%23-#e*_Td$JlntUt-X|NUp(+6l#31& zdCmFg*ROG(74us;)cO1Q`Jz$>2%P;JyQP1~ciuChm+_TdQqIf%8?Op^ z?pL*~RmZ5MJdJ)W;u4FpL;3Ds^Y2zvzau?V-o5Cv;Co#OkB3|W%G|y>*(+_MLbi$U)3-2Dfdt22jT;M26)?AT>p{#slOdw@c+4F9fNxg z8P*Rs^!oJ#_f2E}6YNfj9wp1WAm>4O{XoAO{QE4$#ftOM@HZWQPczT`lzo!p5)EASM)))9hfliur<1_p zw<(dmY@a8U4zAF57E|ULL})bZUXK-C-61a zS4Scd3pqZ^aIV7Uk>}=WcOIZW$v->f*wxEZ)9QpC+r^Si9^s0bY5Y9x9`01JU$Vg2%P_P3)z1g@MM%bR}E?*`Zqyk^!{CJN%u4l0PCnAo+ zzj|?;`vJwz`K_>@<8#FKPo^B77+q+5)Ju!hl;aZzoc(*2|3oJ_J~oAXe*LYpvj2ME zi72~0Y;i-HSAy-!{tc-e-beN?6>{G1g&&=7u6!!{mjRsTo6l>Q+R6Ge@Vt=?acVJP z*JC;UG2z00H}ro{Z694`1`di}9PnhwCv<$=RJP9s+&NKf?Kfgb%tP6}RN$P4UYBj8Y@Y$&Dd+Z8Cwr#I?W>OnZC_2Z`EBL)&4B(G z@S@ibZ6N!X2s{qBZg$T@a(q=|Li6j!!zQEU`V$rPPkX15L$2QjJQ?MYq$X?Sb$}lA zrviWUGS^0V9guHkg)`d19_COwuO!7?B) zzNcdRj066k>3T7Ke+kX={9S7v|83xP+;??O0ahgCQ!?}=f|t~LOtFIC`RADb`TmN* z&_RViFN5pzH0U{Y>YbgZ@^z~OJUH(1{IY3g)d{>lp}dZ55!!CvFFN*>+s&Ly#EbWp z<}EvTO=~3Wf%=2*yWaF*e&BQG2iE_RGU)J)p1{=($n$$g`Wx)i8Wdc%i*XllexAH) z?@g7a_kHg$>-PZfNGJTq#}fyr`mgF6Xj;Gh8tW_3ueknll~0HDczk&gaVb8k+`@jY zKjEXOid`y1_h#G(oaQRGFSLSB>HD=(QNx*-Uo_2QGw994aRWyOT(4#-|zUPR) ziq7YKV2ZB;@*MvN%Y!946G;pC7|3&c8w|f#S7!{sA^Q1ugt%Jo{>1kikp6V&=Xq_D zYg;>=B}+c7rD$JOq=-Yahns7LXW{C2yeGpHE#kPd$(v&>UV)T}9yxzid4%6=U+Vl(J>~crfph$-5Bqe696t~Ao53s8aq3mx?D zW)&L9J{NFRUig_OPh7Y|;B+0qf*x(wul?|IPz2R0!{y?u0ygnI@ zescbqF)r} z7vwxBd$!HrJg4!?3_KlW#^9HR+&PS2an(e=TH&{ur6xadv^i(I>`&Y zoKGVTtkcQsSs!qgfAMJ4ad{s`h4}Dz=(=@qfZQJpg+x3|C@*d8(3AIRC?0O;w*cpP z@p8w{`|!Ge<3W6mH``-}T;GkYS45hbDN6F+3H>hc+|^EZl;(4t7w0)&e7OrO&4+n} z6y<>0k4$s4Z`IpCI_-O*KPmgEL0y(so6?_YLh4Oq@xCnSup9AMj-0rSh zg^NnK(<0XAJbvbSQh2RAetIBpMmL%*DVM)YG+kb zyOQ8h{mOk^H+X&2gSrJ@WC*o^-~AQ)x&+aFZw#)ly^vQ$3%?1c{pe`vZ?emc-)r4? z@4)0d3qtPy=ljb!Z^J)nTS|@ik-QE1IPc08Ie1PZ;c>tdQ8t`XzLh-Avpo0P6(wT6 zmF1Hmmx{7P;*Oefzv1_|X8^Bry~`ov?M1$QZJk(O)*n+$#E0!)U3Gb5*}gd7 zY~R7w())-rv!&VL1Hvw`qbeA;&WweD*hP zV$DJ9uU}qksTQg~^=B8E5jaSH6686bGBy`pD(6!QaBh#P3zypE_DTcJ?NOzBjlyz! zB>>Mv`KZ|ZO+3z1zu|cB`>ehlFm~S#3 z)BZ2#DM?V?D*G*+r~Vv^JoiA}hmvp_@Aaj!`nSK{;C;!ynIaGQe&Y}S`le`3@9E(0 zc=38KZjZ66+Dh6*zpz0+=k1yEe=pZq1F+vd|LzxnvX+K;pn zo(i1X@l?wvE}ew){#FKfjop2M@4X^_`8zxwr|?%_TEwGUnR|73zfFaM_{#6_#DM?y zk6D*;o0%y};w!(y6A%8A?m8c@zgUX+%J1+bg5R;}%sRZjVSXTwFN*P$t|}%zz$#f12*|-c`6iu|DGSdmmE3*BeDV@@oc_iZU`&l*H%f7h)0LSnx}Yn=~SC z_WKvJeOJ^5e(mwe7^|ir5Ai_O7(4&m-0dSmEW^cl@tC}F&!90c_|;1mv-bGFJ4UG z6OZ!Jioey8V4NyKm5Th$K*@VD%;UegbVzzxm4DohNRrO`^Fym|7`m>q-F{x4`IJBW z+?Ee=&pz5$f$JoH9Ex?H;a%ZB=^%M8?z?39h&$0KS@Qn(|AEi<^AuWmJougllD7lr z`_X>47y65RB-{y{@2l+c$=Np{`wyEj&f$Kx;{6(FWqCK`y(kyA%lBM|0QmK5?KMN= zQ#X9TH*$P@kTaAQejh5?YJB9`qB=4 z5M-r+%WmPcIhyw@;223pWTm_}>5@^>E(AgWu(O z@+TJjo{6Q_=j2Zs>WK%h-tg&VWq(qDCjxJC{zg)8O!3bn z{N7Xc*L_B;Q;z>-XsF@9p(OtjaGy;o^wl`KAVcaW+L$__{b0!OUoNm3lFx)(bc~3@ zvwSB?N&Qfp@nNX^=!Bz7a*~gS{N|8iP&TTSH<#3p zb+I^~g0jSkca!9Pnhg8XfUoF(a5i6$A}GpYZ{qdk;2cP!;fk6H6W@IC9%m4x5? zyTq>BEqc5;`TR2Z=#P&&7C8SdF=>){UHgaO*MV!|fzP57{$pkD66Gx~JEYM6DSr}x zb9?fAIhVTq`90?`ap?%O2mDBaT)j3c>qZJVfP0>aeBg2S_TlkuSr5r)K#s@V`6>0c z%kkD%7XEU7Is5U1mvVpM@gxR3)9nfu<^B@$P}Cm>e91Ib`v28mY~VdGp4*sHe@TVC ziQt_t|6M8RewSc;*CGbv-b|@qzxG#w@45K>ei674-j8uv3%tQSyAB!BbI1_mP+L#q zK>N@>0|ywtv-KQc>@#$TvHQRwLybKXy7%naLlC+R>(M*-`ewRLQfI;*Qs@7!OD@ZM zB5u$B`EWC;2(*XME8<}V?m6*yu%A-cuqy+9bB++7{8LpC{?Ol)H>tl0KEF@ve632=S%%gNUd4LB z94fDNPD5VcJ9Z~8o>^$Ewv2z@(>lQC=Oh|5atBvsRKE*2*KhlJxt;6xm;duVp#J0l z4!@q@e47q^s~)x3aBK9mNksAE+LTtI;=wOoz)gxXUNob8Om z--BNb3*K+d3Q3;_cG$q{HUCUWZg*-=Wn4*?+S3ZTB*?K$3jXHU5TDx9i}Uoizg|rY z+Vj{-b7~UlDEs&f{LS5=(21PJ9wr zsgr&S@OD(8|L8Qp{PEo3yGqdi{c#Fjhw^?2KYwB#-ENo0NUW@b_;%>afZa~~UFlkb zz;h7nKS>c^xnJS|f78EjzNh&|jt}LpPm#Yq@JXNFA8kTGkr$kw1wWg1mM}W}xXxT% z#EY-jW;r&_R|ldIuqXIjAMb~;zikfOeqVXrP5P|R=Rnz`(0i%UewH>3{fYM_4NKSD z7S;%RypYr5dzZ)Oo=sz){pE|mjahyHF7rdU&wwFAzv?rhXRBTx_3YI(_=rmY_1hKf zKL(TVchb~G8ynmmRgVZ1r#PHvyPg#Kr8QIs;$#EPb~RddBltc(^4kZy6Txew{qZ=j zYY0!qdH&9O{^y4Vg?U5`gs0&BY^mV&@aFFxF5yO8pJxDH7Pb6QgoLwx{*JkOOZUQI z?kxTK8t4}&UzmQpruQSHMY|?L zFUzke-yyFguS*1;in7)v_fSoieq9F6^K;hKo7Z_I$Ik{_UsL$GZU5fL+>$)|7X!S- z@|tZUfm6TZ^{IV@=r8=<#h>POe4_TUC!&=3-rizxkfmF-{ss)RNRS3B@NB^Ubp{iyerW^V89qMH2jTK)UNZ@!Oib^AO!*$UDh z1Dxxhx8uF~a{bAOALDO7bf1&)ILO;jrWm?+l!`# z+7&M0aga|1ul|p@e$4~iAMfxayazZ9Wd?X}QjS-SN@q_+N&E!x649ReS|UD<)#ZQ8 z>&?!O2j8(=w0|u4U$r`$oX?Y;&+i$Ig`5rid_O#!YH(-gC*ZxrNnC>8cDbW(ephyW z<_N4iz)uB#;? zO#Ds|4}SRySGp9oX6L7Y$JhUf%uoELR1r&dehT*{JPzmi`oYxV)%V4rCy-Bg&j`=^Ht^S`7cW@C z7+N3kmGgcg_}`W~@sNHGSIqm_ekVx*e{j)=f9Q8{wNwSIuaxsX!L+_I!p{uIb3M^@ zgx|6rT3?xPp5$pg5m!2N9qB19@=)L!tsC#pp52emAtARYv@_x4=R`~mSw*s3u24tVDMri%* zGpgK`>$gCT>t9#L+kkzg`c1&?D3ASm`INjbV8QccPT=O3FPBQ!{aUx;eeK7$Ts$V% z?}Z%uH*8<4;Cu9`etvI>54^Fz{P?--UwqL}|BiK=*hi=CgXr}C+pw^+alz<*NMC-@B46kz2Hqx-ZqZ+7bt!l7q0*F!zD-ORKKCV zh{K|$`M;3sH{m?*3r5uFekZ5;E#TFB{r>)(>gV@AMBH7UlvDjq$dB9R3yGf_=e_X1 z?VG<-bE@A9-m*L~A~PrxqrJM&;97gxU)NC`<$#F zrR98^KC*vop9OKOtx6v(+h=Gb{Nwm;yR`F~9AB=V^XK{Aazo|%O^~;sELOKnQ`tYR zpZn)W<5q+`$LEBc6YW#1&R5sv_SY8`dFO=vhdy@KlI?dx-iz|_jj82i`?-D#@^IbV zLc`_!H#8Rh+fo1DUsY}(=O@>1fc%gqFD}dVn;>sNxgvuwaV!QgK1@au<7vYHmWclPGqWw63Mm&w4E9Z|L@=lZuhd-Pp`|oD`@Ne$! za&2V)Ou)S;TTX6SL(U&J;>P3m#Y)LKdHm${E8Dk!dDO`;ba3k5rVmAYSbwvo<9^N~ z;TGULzPFfj;&GIO$K!cIZoimUj>%H{1)mpu(d0xYns;^cKWn?b_vKYI!1(J|yP=== z=jLxq9o^@jzVjLP0_Xj?yO*YYp`DO)4YL-q51U1jT| z1o?h5ALI>9g`e%Oms^y}91suKXTo{DE{i$#ci-H={nstQ=cO#*Ia0(r<^D$v*F=IR zw2A#ne!eON&mr0&S7p$F$vNHs;Dmi{lrHdBM_v0c%E+2UN!L*Z@c4HjFZg}dz0IAM zCoYIle4U7^>LcNQsh8Uu@pr-qH{m?@pU&S@Y-*75+X9^1@AapyM*JMGUq1Le5a-wJ zy|&ZFa_0kkg??P^ggochbkDKm1;zWkArlFA1Lyoox%+R%<6_631J`(gkA+V~E)=#c z3M<(KxGod#b>aSZb#%fessHJ`h!?l-t4b5!)f&%O$BSn_1humMETg(#F88Ga(=mibAII?-u6-?c*0td?+KrY`|IQj$NDA(c;>{HkBUpU9e5h>JV^)E27ZKL z`>;OD1b+DTu%dxM7`O#^be!&MUEte+Uny4oio9Mhpgla`UHf!@$n_M5x;k6#iEYYn>#= z#|YdAeBQ-xqO$s<|NAnE{Vp?jte@ALD(LCA`186_e02`+S%1T0B|_$NmN%gN7q#D8 zM2?>a^4z|SJDkjv?N0~pSSIqzRq)`ia{W%|dc% z2YFoJ{4<01pyBf2fo!0P~ zh{veGxvz1Y$rd`u9uxQ`@IGreGp`))ghJwaCn-Vn!=KYP)nOU9$j+|nwDz&@LxLfFFKfd^VN(Wg!4sslKmF;7L9QPRDHk4tLsw|WH8INO$z%P%j zSd;r1`R98t)W7CmCohuyONAV-+pf1>QcZ0X4Dv4nINP_d-jeAW3Fm!peJkPrxaOty zhe>!0&U4-@Joinw7Pvoevfbw$2mbjH2d=Om!Wxk`$*{);Uh5w#-{tEZ%EMH&7sopZ zycQo!X~sDs>vMpg0$zppGOBP+1^mZ({(f0_xuc`x>+(3*!}yFHO%BN8LJaU2i-=FB zk|z&ye<1xluEYV~HhWL5+TR!({$Y8?sEQc`y_)m(J`hO_gktz z73aBq+JE(PAqIn~Gebo#oY-<&!*ZnGS( zc*yDD_w;ded{UYzBt=&t1QvE!RaXd!!E#92t zLHU!ydhuTFH2i&V_PjW5H`(7L;F&B}QbnH=2pm+O9`T6zQpDp(drw<=U&f03ivvDC zMb|>!m+@gtp48Jva2H0zY@Fn34A# zX}zjkr;u)1uUaurW-Etk6mHFDUbQPDj9=C-nqf+npEha)-3Abe~HiE zMe%|cV;6Q`>VDUw%Yh%f&H-Q5TEt^~y-THdpG4Nr&lT}^PE6qUUQw}Mgprw|BzyQd zA^y&Z75qLm-kYrVUjXr#KoZ1P-p}O(KhM#!S919iROVBAreZzH&k1?JCwwhkk5-TKsW{)b#9O`mU5a#^=kI9UtMox@o#c;e?;(M@EO{3+Y$pmk<1*^((Z=qsT96 z2hK0KedxXcAM(uDPQ;VPdJF!R`E=ia4d=-Nf1EWce6ND9@eMuB9BqHh$@{XpOuT=} zh~JN2T)CI1whI5Lol>EX$DOyIt_{~ncm{ADU(~EU& zp1&LXH2|e2O-s`~QV!(gs<$h-icT|-7Wis##l>Z(w%?g+7PsDkBd*T02jo*I|0sH)U5|NDf z#eo+C-mITHN9&^EU7)hW_@{8gZWt-;ejlnzFA5ql4Nz1$=IY(FHr~)uX)#PXo@+ecI-> z%bQEWGl6q|+F)$t}8O7gM5Ip4ouJ!(fD36BTP^T>ua=KE0+ zo&cQlb$_wZ?ea=^5^x@uz1=&G;`goj?NjsjZDR2K*EM+$?Yg?+=z7FQod)?dm6%U< z&uHJIpmX!DjAsHjYA~P8eKhmvwGlIbYoa>||8K?~{)Wyy>GkTbuK9LvXZcv*e4YPl z&$rI%U+F$%JRUe-=U=MY@`Ou&uPty*0&w1w?9%4YAIUp=>|}Wr#sT*4J72>0j{0l* zFrET=_U|`)`JWC{PWg@TG~n!C;_-`>|882dBiEk^oc+6TVsphGY7_`uQ&N1RI}88W zzfUqRcnbTPc4Gapz}dgZ9fdc?miTKe>yHP{d!|haFFC&d%O3542k%4T{OsRq;4XQ* zOoBY;SI0TuPLak-HGe;e<6|GAI&`7^$+2u-8ss@XDVdHpdC$!YESbr_OyC@!oz_NU zdjF(;!S+XY32pz6zbWB~diY~y)*lO;`MavZnqKxBV1YfQ*fTgm!YLT{Z2389G__L5~F;5 zW&1O6J^|(K(;Xhj^+#KU-#k8T8CLIXgk)bVa2}sZze;rLB|Hs!qnW7BnNB_2AzD@X|KLZ@ zc>FEBuTm{lL44(Wn+*O$@8%ALOxgKLd(yyPeeS<=g^fAzmGgf$;cwOJk>iROvh$Vp z#DZU^-5*x^-AlHg*3ruOpWLH$K@#R=8|0Hv5>D6SZs~7oH~#&He;=9_KYKyeK1`U( ztoZ#SJybq;zr`4f^)ssDcHh(widWeh*n6OH(%4=2&EwqkX1UXjZ)#hgxP+U5^Ej7M zX~e3o;Txv|*I0q`Z-1B74Kk0M+_Nz#pAY-P_)g>W74EHh*No$NSnGm3KNm7&&YwS# zEFI*(2RQE&+B*HBN^<=U$niMx`-@)HZrcv*p`qii+(>Bs-qzN?|9h)cdsvxDCUlJ%t{{wDAy-n%~4 zf7uu~sGr8+Ib+UGe*gWP#K}pVr?NgP^f*x7o7wG4d7sve^Bk`x3ue~K?eC9t_~RYC zzk>5wSMcgmgSSOs%g>LieURsTp8rnY=FPf^Ti6IU^b-DZKHoj%tTgAJb7fh-2{>P; zcItia&`!g&N5IwTGsJwGgnVAKVW2+Ox{1SqYweKdb-nKKJTqZ*P`<<=&v@Q(XfC{# z_vwvjH#hXWb7xWm&Igir;=C7S&Fde|)ENWn1NwO%n&-_%<7Y&w{o^GaByZ>~{O9=o zbmvVcjfC?)v_Xqv?knMK@JNOa%qpGl-!Wv)&*uFWe{?WH0wW_BSE@R&&-vcsk@*ep9)%<5*tKPnAvh&G{MAH*K_X|Bm!|pw9?? zLazzC^pZUmoagxc_0=yMa%JJc-?3CB#JK0FmAhWM3JK52BfoyN6Y{*SUDm7b%p;{Q ze!#dJIIn9PUN+@x{`u{2#=XFKUHk0)RVO-M*)k8f#s{4HN8ugIDouX3ZA+Fn^bv93 z{?UBooQ3xb{ydd&6L9VyBOX34GOWJ(6zjJD=j)oYZE95gFIT<5RyoCw^N-i{t=EjW zr8bkaXm2OvIevG_7pSW-6Dn}dKR0-F%boio%p8CN`Rm1b&c8#3`g^s&bILy-_&?T~ zc1MRi7TQF8{QU#|onxSJ#10;}$RBfG5ib?z`@s%Xc<;-P2j{;sP`Y?+R2#$jYaEZ@ z{f68gU4D2x?dR}c9Ym*ma6vz}M~fwuAH3S~eQUe&=V!rSjkk_OGFGnZ* z$E#kA)2p{C^%eb}?C0@>zpA+BP|+xmOR_%f}ZsqR(vI02L|tl^Z!^J-h`<}-uijS(F@XLtueuLH1d0&ihGtRSrW7W?6ybnY9#{0ci z@OXTAc4h7w-j5O9ihVQYJ7Bj1a+4SA>yg{aOi|MKr2@~0(hYuQiSMgLTC(#U$Oq2n zbnuG|d^<0XIh0TSS;05-7jf9N*O)N=msg47`0#2+H6O<%kdF5#@7?bBth zOVh$vs^0;57s{uvAJ&SH<#8V&w`YTx$|3i&q(hGNZyT}LE{#t*590%ce@|;Kys3wN zIe(47Ie)Jvzo<+5xbi{v^8J=(@CR=wagE=TMtJ(?Vja%*F5flTD~+e>lwD%|l#c6` znSZp}^2_SA?@~Q}d953IdHqzn_ADOS0^^w%IA0G8y?SDe8b(t6PT)S2+y7a8O^%1b zj{c6g)SsI+TyF2oLs;M8ewNqezU(aPH$mQl^1UXr?#uaL$9W!aHE~_K$oXK0T~6@U z{d;2w_hahs9?oaj=LRpfXofqd{_6tY3*P1G@(!Hm{{MH|{Tst2+zi}>a_{tUB?5w-J5&jZR`wlVE-^5qmSIO@?5c;y#(Fko!rmTmxytI@5jnm)T^o7kCITI!zFmbR(;n`8YhD5{uJ=$7YN%Jq965gKYOk2 z`7_@iLUHBqOJ+hovGV(^s`EXo(|5msGRyF{2F&+o&D z2QT$pvB!bMIt2;`*~8Z{3E(yE_AD|&!c8_Y?r^+bjkwuWj+YDmrb2$thASV+@yft? zj>kVguF%W=a6I(GgkNu`w`rGCJh=X*MK->Y32Ll~)JRA$e^%KW;!{`?!7uj)Kv>-GT?Td=%qyvPe)&&A!kx>{`s%Ih+J5O(`ePm{|_Eb@BKkRbeJ z`&30dKZi;3Cg6H}2Oz55&voVXfdx3*pXc$sccuAX>okk{6Gy_1PwE-v`&FEf=j)+; zjY@S@CuG_02F}-GgMaAvk4D11z}bJ>z4=jL67B=e{tce>eRHjZ8-@%2dA<5)($H8P zaQ}Q0;YHl+&|?B$8#6~6ZWDI$zr?qI@8)&|-&gx_6TXi|<{LEF7ePBZz#m9$yeSVV;CXglX9H-rCG_s83m_tVfk>cKjf@7J<}PySIqPQiOa_`One-ro;`@8S1=-zsW) zGdYjaaGv9`fBE8_Y79Ws4>N&t9t~f3q=W|TM>zK*{(UcPxW=S*Q0=0hazBb4DdI8o zzYC8vjsQ&d>Edyo^Z2e|;;}FZPXO-uQ_Qm~e_#2BR>G5j^L(}7-+B{u67EF)@%x;b zwkzUOC#wPn)t?4={{8dC#-c4X5}pa1{mZwnZiO%jkN!TiAJm`XX{43#Sm4~xYmQr< zPX}D?Cn=~W9{j2QT)!EfB<$pWiLcE21n|!nZnZcfF|>Efu^jIuGpA|%aifFm&wxDJ zKS^D9O_+p7BQBgTQKK3@mD@XJwD61TpI-i{T59ibZa=O+4*X7I8wA>0*&ce}Hk3Ce zM~;j@Uij_RrhO4QPYl_SyQSQ}Qy|Cr8?|m&3AN-;CgQ;MrkhF*~CqI(?<#Ck#jRk+{^(l`jzm@)`p}u(VS{3NjSMpbvi1XY&53cy0>9gVy zeE*rLml*HYr#!!`aRr)}>Uxn!{8z;#uZ6k~9MHX|edv&{dkz94kPpFiL3~x_ zIeuL7+LPWNJ8(cqI8}asgYk?VE8=qVJ7OMOQ`Kz~yykUF)S^LAyFdv};Pk>wo-v8I3^pWRU2~Psf z@|hJ*6x0Ftzjs$vMyOKdy}vx4%Ha3Ff6zP<54jYSY5aFlZ7rfuQFF7o&&$V`ZPmS*R-8cP8N6E|<>zTTbqGKGbUg@6x!o`M6)n{ea&qc;a6EiL!pK-wAnl^1ZKQ{cfD+ z^|^1`sXlVQwgdN~tQ@(lOE}^z`^WVkpVFXSNc|Iq|Gci*xqNCxxqct?n!wZl@JEjb z==ZmGxYs56w}ayV-mTiI$lQwdCO*G6(bh)H-*)g5{>%6}(!(tyO5*c-6H_s6yTI?0 z>rCxD?(F;+jI;WIB5%FmUnulPjVM=kemd5poPVlGA|5Y){Hs}BXDFZInG8Ej;ME=c z)sB49yp@D`&k9^S?)Q@h33uQ;$NR;vGZ*HUaMh0@o;=TQI>ue9?dEV^bXm@pa zot>`G-!ISNqFRUWgX~vL7XER+8GE&LU!8=zAa4Zku;uOS0v z4xHn=;ggqVi%PgEQTWgOX;Ik2VbKz91kUmKqS~Fs#emEH^YyS9{3EwFmMv}*cJjZ( zS6&ZW!9P)EVbK!t%oHW@d0olZt4{ErcKo4Y$+*yX5np*--~s=$NqX%&vDx{&j${2k z@DJ4ZsaL6(?0n_*uyKlrU+ap|v8AK4^Oe`b7VzC8S5G(UL-};Q%h$v5Ohx-vE?loV zAkTYsZu~9tY2PXp=P8o@JPAIxt$Su!PTUsrI*dI%qE_HG1wXFVPZfUf@9clx?D}!* z&eIP=UL6CRe`jBPsQ-&yo9FO*RWxzH`F+x>ibcD7T#YzH^8R*-umR`&N`Ah2ow<4= z*>+K1m`Yzp^n1nI%<4et|dvA$nLmLV=36j!A_I!|#;f!;Kf@l!>;`e`B_ zvM!3N5$A<`*89v;9}79&_t=p-+Nbfb5Tg%k+r(iN8zMy6TW^njG{;0Q!2k3k%NAI9?S}Ryx@=SwaxVZ=Xpcb3=tPsyHyQydfqSwdCL1&Ch*Ba%DWhR z_dw1gYB$?+5m#=P)lmyJv%mhhge&8o1ii@@r>+dk?q_&b+=bp0@b6FCXVPYmWAHm# z9LEgs*KhixK@M>Yen*Sr7(G+OrTw5c`6!O^LG~-h$vE)0{k5S9#Zf+JAJC3C1umHU zU;_BWqc|qxZ#j%;h2B5s#Ao9Ydm(RUTmNM98AT=I3i|7#_~`UgH!G9;){ z)|U)@D`pkz|JyP{;BgAl$JcLMa>#N08q`JA%K9>)@0@AndmX=hkpesz59eYLk5qSb zEnbIFeXO6$2>2teA4PR?JvOI^!@$U2?_H==!4<3r`_jCxS$C(mkvf0|?DYTcBkFfU zK5oXrq8bS|UJ~nQmM_%&Wm#F?2RYt1y3p0UTb4J>7IyJ^GQCpAPs1erCg8k}H(|uQ zWUYi-fb;cPkrtDl=_K6C^@G=A!0US963+JVc%S!vncrpm+>qmOdv(vh_saHpf%AOO z)aUCV+vfw$*WdF=+nHe!?gh^B7Y;nw zs+Dk`!oJIW8Wz+^c(8t4=d~R&b*_Bb__b=>-n_;f-|83kiU30m!^ZEMM3?6?^!?R{>&D=Tgt$04m1pRi% z9g8k7Fw&J>zZ3l@8gef1Gfy_}k;k8B{;?={ko_?{PN4LHf4In@7EzAu{4|VzHe4^O z<_UlEwe1r{&u1$2CxXw{%O>!T_pUc3pEWz5ulHjXiT1UEKkV*_QU*(QK40(0q8=ys zb$UM^Pxm1y?cwWvANrXG{3VC_{8+%0ov*y!_ksVpZT$9v#_W9M^^9@8h|k|ue*Lph z_UoT)?{Bbx-)!x;3x)lYg={~q18j=*lmmQ~|L~6wTE0Hw-;dA#=3FlSF5m^9^KNIj ztC%`4iv{F$KHxn5v^K8&R+CEF17JU;dM>dSJn{U+c%KRx;D$T``53viyFCPd6mk?r@Pemi)D%4pxy zOZGW&-n?G)j}QOtQYlv!u65%)?_a)LKmWRDJ<)#ryDj@)d+;}P<@WPJ|No=xy#t%7 z!v66zZQ8V~vcnELOalmn9hQV$Wrd-J9TcJLD560TBC{$&*i}#>Ln@#IWki;dSx_N> zKtO?_jIs+detB{}PkM6O_x--V`$tc6KcDA0=XuU^#y$7kd$W;tsNL;Ql>JMD{p{aH zYoFDO_lX>6d@=&(@)vJ8=hXxWPXW&3?>_^-+Q9uP$!8$nRPYLX`EJdmT>CU>IM3tr zko)IK7m#qT2lF5BHZ?wUqag55e-~MQsrj7m#^%9gWxYZ(P?yXYhJ#x|4m*d>^1Hi-lc>kFJIaJn!!Ki{QBdPro4P* z|Cw7o$bMSjEtR-7ztD%b%8V8i$`EW`4464`ys#wtu zxE$PG##L8OiAffkDE^fB2B7Er!uPr>^CkP0`I4saIuYl;LSa9C=dmB>NuKP{RuSc8 zo^rov2ENP4--Eo?v{Ymri^e_W_Z)H!mkn=YHw<6#(!Cm|1{B;JQpXJquCPn$r1v#$Y{_TI>C(E;b4|tnC-!g*N zHpst@BhmJ~ICR!T*}g2uv43l{Tsc{`Py0o5`38Qpa<*K*{G7P~yxo`IDJ_@J5B(P4 zPV-&|-%F?R*@4@EyHa|UVJfFG@OILK>7gtLGAz}Kli zPAM$KAGZ(w?#;$8-@Gcf5AB!2e*WI~lY(Ps=GQ(9;AQT8w@7~N!vcKgvh+E!|G0d1 z;P0L})n6(^Rtx`dd{$qxtCuX#_F2H|KJ$)Aj!!M>h4uH?^YK7gKgX8~@{g{5dsxJdc|X!EUzV#X$Cn>=X8}LDqxzq6e7S&Y*9bfJoS5#E<0}j0Hvo^DH8{D5 z6kl5Oj~3v6`=%YmFf8uBD8@e$rE%4T@yHH2-jD6VZ*IfHr+Gy>&eQJ@_K0JYQ;z8g zp>H@7hmKJDh^)T`A#a?zXWg@o1->Jk<|o>(gx!2!isvU6PL?Xi{RDC8pz++Qu*U#- z!l_(b4o-P2Yu7RVeOM02@7++OMPSzZrY)R>+ROo(f^wp_lkTI zns5W~Akxb%{{D;Wf^gMZVK>ho_r;q^#UXGB*8}J4xn{%O>Y&k!64Lxq`Thwr_#=}0 zjfm$40E39Hj58bfRn*Ua;QoN^r}?Nd&IqG+V?}+YLEebx@qGBrbw_+^Hvycd-yypq z-+^AH>ezwK<;;J(TeI~q+JVRDJi;%0Klu6d0(X*=H+N^;1f1^&&x)_L`|k#81_D=G zfw!U)p=0dPPAg+d)jd!DlVABe#Tj^xU}42TAHM$;!sAj5(eq_%jiW}ArGwWQ`INi$KO-dtrPa&UOqTAUh@+RQZ%*FdB0H^+x-&4!q z`?P|m_P?-Fs}EOWFUGYmU}mOBi61;6^fTWK{`Q8GzRu@+P6?6y4B+v;fOr1&4=ZHMtDpBvWG)c# znhv?n|1LdQSf7{A`yWgdMY%Jk^K+gQ%OSc6=$d@{K4z>-E9-zk=N^;;B$Qa)c=daF&1G5#b-Kjj<0^FSC>^w zxDPnT&wI_bz7s3qLEs#JXUq3K6bC$1U%C4r;1|^3=8qMVC%|tn@$i1MGjfUTA(`gWVaB=l(N@ z-!h-(2RS%T7Em1Xx*6|l;{7})%f32Wot($cJpHjLL-_H(V4{cemh+?jIH>54?ckGU zTHjOdo8kJc+Q^&|gZ!yJl;!k7&!SK7RmrEEdHUHP_=hI`u#xNwN zcfwAVHRHEzFZtJs^CVC98>@T|XU#eH$ zf5z>N(L9{KjVkcxLE#g74n(%k%ukXYF`V zKgr-{fdBW=$BXhCp9A>rJ&y-L@U!n1dy?Py>;<2nBTfEZ*jsr}kKKjzY^g}eUblj8 z27l(ty``1k%Ok#W9-9h&qXHivp!JnV{}B40`i)dYzmX0;m4L>}%=e??bziGtH8@@g z&jz34zx}w6+D1M9@B`xb3!$gz#wjbK_P+q<``c-cR;mO;C{XE~$ttwxnfTZ6Doa5(dqkonal<*YbJYJO_^2^Oaz(e&Nuk0^U!QVc5 z!PUY(s>R%c_{#nwjr9+i@UTcmE|>lzzOujYfuB7*;7Lx;%UAXn+2HT&<=tL1Eid1p z=r8nM;jf)vdx{ow=H)B3Ux~x^YWGbg&F)wU8mZ0`n-H)e~}9Qqnjma zl}XOaSN0d_;9tA;&VBy=BTLadLfKysM)QbF^aGiY=lP53M`54b@6h~3hw~&)?S$Kp z1MmCXpZHbrIQX0THRb+gE9B#bR6eFLla}0r_{#mu4)CkZzc?a3ub(5=O&;+0x@p0{ zD@XadopT`lJa6|c75!QOa(zCldNQBu_sDl@c)zpuC*hav+Se;4=5yVotQQmb9h$wo zDoLBSA5TL+&eu(L@Ttrp|HkpYa=vc*_wL$S@^zCJe6ELAb)Q6CHwA!mKla75?lt7= zrX1khPi2hhbY8x0((MrTaz8ie-h2N1uAA8ZCh$+DkAFGgf4OdA|69R7_wtCU+W+Oc ziT&>azeUcoqWSng&%E9X{xws2@dECCe{mKt&3HJc! zcz>bG#G|niZU^p1dgsHxX2nT3=g;k7pl^BK81yStKJD)4cz1f`sV$6$38jjCHYAE z<#~Ip8c%NWbvos5fjrOK=TxgSTI~#HA1*uIqCENhqh4lRy7aVc9<&Wgg z{X?^5FUQ7&;(`v!-w!$N9~Q42yO7r>2+sn}?SJUeq@}Tvya%{;ukgc{@29lZNckIZ zp2x#m<+g6&_t=E(2hRP&qM3%S^7}oqP+xZN3;1=q1?+j^GhW#qwflr$-hO}5rGnPHd}Vty zf&WH>MQ00H^757K(GLDw>pCqcY|6`5wnsPkA7#HDTf~r;uWXNg@U3OLewD1thp%Xl zIpCi$^lMyH8_lQr1GmTMb{(hkqn-`>g}-?IV8w5lPxInGXp256)dV=I88tV@Myh6MlZn|F!5ZbGDzD&OQm@aoLLX zjT3*Cn?|y9kbDO8azC=mFxM~7BQk+=KheAD(A#QTSUfDB4V?Rlqa$Z`jFs>-;K{#; z@|P(5()BnA=lr=J`EgMfr#z2HfgJY}oi-fkE6*cRfpb4`^i9<&c^+W|o`&@O^rJt? z^N5^p{{PJ*JmB+pb26d#@{_;vokv&|`c;16hoKXTJ^kP25k~NM{J1etKjwd%M`WNJ zHpo3|ba!cf^N3W`2anrn;QQx&v?{-OgdTj}zvBbHL9e|h^P5Km5cjM<8~pE2tUjCH zJi_jY9_RJH3jZuy^>spi^9T$0T%Hv0>#pcjJHL5^L80FX{#z@5Z~K3lM`VD%cz@hi z`OPDetBH94Uv~zTqWz};&p=xH>m&W;c>?Fp?ca5|e40E@$c7xZ z|4)Z}yiT4cBp(v?ar=JfYV-B-JRuYEM(|plDPLQjC#2v!xBo$FIu?=V38}!j{eN<< zcA5O<32ERh9CfZ-e)9xwZyDhAC_i5Rzs(c4y=8)5tl#D}`OOoQ?M-!9_#>uF|1a~K zCn(#S5&SM&z9^mFJVDvsY~Zg>Kl68f^8{skO9Owtx$}tp<_XI7=Hv1_D)lJ8d4jUN zWrP32#FAtFFY^Tb5#gUXnV&DqZ=S&IEk=ZJ_%E$9BqNSeAkXszCw|L(nkTq%o)m*e=(Jg0fJ z(jR8<_rHJsrF{Gmuk?ov{8qiUe3Oqq@~ms6f&Zzkz&fQrXkM!H2iZ#T7KC4Xkhk#j zCiu<%AwI>MHdFY8ev_a0xw=$*N4EOEuBI$Q_25<1gGC|F&sDO#^H%!xT=~$vu#ku= z74Cx%T{XHhU^*FEpNR;ndxfV&>Rta}O-VEM@5C8a=_xuuW!+G5@AwMF0=nASg zItb4mA>xz$QncsI8*De>?3Z-t@ihJRE2(^u_xjxUYH<&e>-d-VxBniM>JR-fLCEnw z&XXrH&lRnhe2Q_^31K(y<6L)Lm-FhZ;-M?HaQW1F;8p2F=;%EoCD@`~j*b4O_%{RR z@_V`pI~&9odxh;FE*)f#59P5z?#|l!C1rma_6UEly_JUl@}^|3CJk~KNYnP#St0w| z3H_PCn^kS3=4+@>{tfa5LT;#C9}&Yur^C z=eWv&-nREn%kOuOvsI7oH+L)?ev$H~gY@fu7k)A!ZF{^$R(|!!`j7tB_FcIit&npd z4ODuehg^>Vl*3Jon2LTVLuCA6jSQ^6~rp1K`c7kWn&0!gFxmJW<%G zA93}97C4PV-YwDo)%_vt{bov!1BoJ=$Y1LJk`?|kfzRc!tA#w5XW^gEddlT-fzRc6 z;p$8Gxjf`=w$p@i@AAG;AV#vsT2-_=_IK>f88>8q^S&6ymt5=lvy5jUf9*+8&TdI* zQQxaDREyT%aiMjREN_6E1?i0!TYoIqryb|rDF4*ey%xyz=>pF7{noPSWvSh2ycUta z2fU8ImFURrjQpcVzr%RhR@yr<&g%|r|L`5=8FKlxr=sJzyX|6BKW|Xr9e*tLqikPr zqG-Ps@YY`2X_W0_`yH@<*nn0;WZb3D@7?g@AlZI9a1YWA2ZBkmeOd5}ANYcg>~liP zR^fyElg0Az)511A$8sDKo;F#OpZ!y2_X`tb{}=+%{z?4swH0!Ew*Y7RvKu}BLiUec zA>Z=E4^iz|3*3ctu>0tDNmBW_e%Zcffs*t(`G|df$Ys7O?6~)4&1tfIS-^RGT7TsH zYFU3)HxXZU_~|u&LYnM$$scK!gEtk&^oa3lF1X{8BkqFG>)yC-Pn7Z5_U8L1zc= zYHW`Gbmj{BKZM7a{uF-VdF7>?ld+v={1fI9ZUxTs%A4^XUmQ)# z{|H>21H2!d2pzX?J}7v1aq+N=Li#mYv_oD8>U`?OyYf1%>71~i{hxDaW7KyO4UlL5 z9=@BrH%=eUDqO#;pVz4lmDy1{HYFE#LqCs)?dv{X%KK}meEi)#FL=u*y|r5-$#Z0b&@#g@}<(u22!oVo|fwTSD^#{(8?Kg4xkQOL^U7wg+K1~4Ud7W?CxN-ex z{g;lg|6q3xc!lTn`zYR>wj&-cPq&G>n;fYn2^>SXEqg-^jmSB>%abywqpxP zxW15(=lOY(J?`ZgQM_>Z+>qyW&<77oPEgwffy(Cv&g-n*Zhzh{)|rdDCy4q9fY;@h zwL{`0+^5LD#K;XF$@%MoqI{gcv)|7z$@%9%uL-7lj|bxEcF#F|%M0Zo+wv&x_d~&Mz+E-2S-!@67*qc)UJWp4*=TdhT?H z{W(Fxxqo2!eI=W|A@$E1uOk1z&)!*b|KbK7Kziey_d97N{oMXof9#GaeP#W+ONeib zS9R7t)64pEIDhc=)cehnDCxK2Jok?ah7GHoB;$~GfR}iFTZa;6Rrm<`H}V~G?*AKI znpI6-so|?c2;nha$np4N_{?>n*6jyBFdhKT<4@g{4?h25Ri8G%)j7b!3nihGqt`Du z(8cO%1YG01F4_;r%c=TjKal$`(_hj4=``rO_vHBs*B{&8Vd}F2vB{)e^gj-Tymj55 zvv~cF;*0xtuD@d`iT5=6usGST@j{;UKlplLT{*tI@GsYIv-|U3mg_G7`5dH={#o&* z9Dn>B0=9of!bnS${eKJlS^wKF{`Nd7et=t%-oNbIBgdZ`{Q~!|uY9(9Bd@EHeQwBc z|E7C)P}ThUH!pZezy8-Y&Y9~U9ojeRueSWhg0lVq|Z^{KWmCyNNyOdz2Q)+mZIpNt(#(8|05H*yRGw<4)qjYQ=b5M{z^zXQBNp@Hdyo z1G(=9v}~MYW~NBVK0ovaz>B~7_E~v6)?O9%bG$t3(_>0uj3Xp(0M7n7n{{+c5eeu1 zp5;r|xjio4n43TM_jc$xd*{Ha1PM1`9Ap12*?#PR{5-ac^GEv6x$mZEC3)`8Isex_ zjeR1|SF<3;`ezSwdSv~6;My$Vhlg{tXA>p;2At>iUh(AD&66bD0(lE~$FF}$|)j=mLMh*aADsCNoo{VSk_;UhsY&e1C5_@Tk1X^~@~re(Ahs zX8CA!;pY#P>zPEMbxu346aFLoVnRxIXq{S}BK;2EpHr-ha(^fEh3ZkUPF?1^3-w|M z3>{=wI`p~!!@7?BeAK$54>-S<=lPb)D|s9a-w#vdPkL$n-3hrM%VYgr^{=pt%Rqcu zf7jtW{ibr6Ul;v7&);3s|GCUEAw15CeH47|^1G(!>m%rMAf5m8k7Dxps={;cZs0$C z>>0{-QU1Zdg+Dm|&yJq2!FdrLfE?eqs&akN1zEpwWc2!W=F>wXW%&%eUsrcs_~WhD z%I}ipO*qf};q{`0YRdB)D{!`N>AjsR<@pV-Q#rs>b^o!Z2JuSe&${xuH>_E4 zOz!$xtjec|b3b^bg5*;^7yjaSx?6K>EjgaFH-(+7zspZI7U$|$#|2wN`}=CSI(67U z(r{}BK$sr9^J^8Ckz_dIBC2|uj4ozW>C3P|3J_xEx6%T(=ll*=EsA95C? z{R)&G%W)9KabJ`3FX{WlE$45CoD1px*YEX_!eSN za{0JF$%4H4=^N|VuT;LAkA;4gj~k$kdjFqemB0O}>Re!joO{?m6l9R2=A$ZKI=gM&L7%k{_iuUP)I z0{-xR63T(}XR-WkVc*>s*0-WtHdi?e7iBf-NoE{zjqespk zBirviEd1+&p7C4PoaFT|Io|D@57H5R`{$YO5?@sX^@(`*gI^>5?BW7O;aC1k_Pg=^ zM6UlQ2^$*7HtLjLU9;#so12lDLyLVH!s*#A`i^kbsF z{ouv+zVax}EG!JiH_n?g1#jp(&yH&(obA`%6Xo1i_n(9D5^lhG<8dK>VL|=Y3BW`C zj&~w|-oIl3ziYeSJMwjkD2-@uCh+ax9ebEMhp#u}`gWn*Ztx}XJf66=%s7Vy2` zyNkUUSK$8;A6ekfy3}_)-#23Yh25wEV^(fgP)-zT#LB00AKv_+8xE9fN($h z4Lk5+(>l*6F5w(kIT#;b9h%Xd<0~e#|B1&mPPy+MHD){)lj1bShx^cemW|3Di z*4!de2#?Fg`H;@=QF-;?i};stjS2a4IZFLjtTX3DxbcCopXYU1C$^8|G7+8(JO$~u zW53@fk8>=~`fF8RtCQtZA(w_UdH7_D)Q`tGii`N;?}2|(`*+^T6E1%y?YTPk>&Nawp- zO)D8H57$4{J+)t6uXkbIm<|52*V3z$;s8NPcGxkl7;=Q4`V|@)EDfBlyOi@$g6MiM z3;L~)b08(0t{>B+-;@u(e>5%7j?!SiC%BVJRXH)VQ;XdHJ&i&zsZ?@gowqMwU5Uvga zuSx=;qru@ELyz)rRiXc>-c^r<{p=qv-lILW(Hku|E{RJA`O67?ddL-DqG~3`X9~`% zo{8(X4)+Rmm*+`YwM2gWyu|=ROjFt4X^`h}@~W%H<5+z-`*8lL(3=6?tldK^#{nmM z+%E_}bA4ul_h{nnmVA9Fv;zl;-t*Q1vC5c`44NBVf5UK;ccdT9PYioZzxeh#4yNtIr^^lF>% zZFTZT5OSPf7Tz1xdf>o&TrN33ANZ;#!oE+ZdlTjBINqPh!kPjS+GwNPj5! zauScHWKSyervl%8_VPt(A4bHU?I_egRj)c4HXY)lpJY!4XA-p^`JnvL zz|Um4X4{6!`#RE4pFIAKod4=09(PGzdsEbp{;BXs#j{_QkgsdZIM46Ru5+Vbd5$wG zuQI-D;MYFb?dAO9O9kACbacy#1$n+2Do?~ezroNdgPwYRd}&sAKYz&nN8uY-A&k?8 z;L-E_VYG|njdf07OFcgHy3gPhGK>M@Ala;%VjIXExmL+{2{*OvpXAYjkR9{$*?yE$`^Gp`$FH4Y}kPVb8V``rqaLAh~(8ytCAc-^lVt$fY3d zGv^N@_ZL*ZN`It+*JIYzJv=W6J0tXm>R0Ix!YIBoP|h^S^Ya`&{8rX)0Ov`b{KWgC z-6O;}y*=Zvx8(bIUYut?Pwf2VWZ91%rqQ{xq~pLD>jNH>~CE#-MC#YNU| zA!iyUQU`e7_qo)C*R`mubWmJqYeu&pH~0b%%}3RuUf3S>lXJ1MJz0wK)IR(BJ}ytV z-zp^JxjYm1FB-@`B-{`y?De9&>P-XhaC;=&0-Wb9$5zkr#_Fkb!r#0f#|~cQnvIU| zyd_*8iu`LQ{ybIA-=oO?-oekDa{eyhex&n0x%`1fAI?5p-&~Je{uV0! zcWU;khO&NMKV|%_kK@!bZio~9u^_Gbiowi%PS}6gKhE+$Yu~OW%iAI6LfYDLdbvE0 z_Tan@anq`yelE8c((eb(_HDYczZ;LQVZ5a1zq7z=T=CEu?$Ze8{o!1`iy2M!$mKI= zqU*n0~df{L0TPc5UBT+uif9eZ&F3S0P6#C1w`mwm2 zzh8k5y|b=@oWBcr7Sh*?Z~lkd8RgH{rJR44*Zn2r{0;HZ_AlJFprf3>7PtjzxhD6* z@8Rb7*TV01;HO5;|CZNfLixw&5O?nKqMgs`+dJm_^a|fXKF$L<-f#F=)v%+8?r{5x z>=zwe>O>i8HxqYgzW(OB*4-f=lLdLcj+$ELe)eY*`;}x|n;`7t>!^VPDlTnzIrA!T zwE_5>bRu-@*;01j&~as0Uc>z*ug`s0tb1p*nV6#e+ab^GuzBpAQ?ceS9B!X1&-)?& zYxh#rbIBgabARi6JEmN0N<==%?iGIXgZF#mhogAEBK5bC>wDl?NKfvXSw@3$2yHaJ zg!WeeH=$m%TH&AN-F|$5_cbt|;>QpFn!ro0P;W|A;=EFX}tBrz8_8Ag|{mH+G@#@Zo*=h3r3Y%S=XS`a@mF-dO2l8Bh zNgXT9lH?=x=K^ow?5cO-kU!NQzfUg<{ksP|!q(+EW0$SL5FNnd?8QeE`ov`pt6Jdr2sV zur}NuM*7bj_*GX(_@~parazST)2KbU!Sf=ufdA32MNmG_sZypHaoKhYHt znV5z&$N5O^-T3^LOxcccJTKaC%f~jUmbWZ@RIDUtMPL}R35gU z>$mxTNoS<^*LWcpKsuz({6_NgLy`S)h$H)F_UTdWKUvtx@lmh$&f7e0Q2sg4YXYy{ z3su#{5np64k5>Wcw}N-i)c$;UP!^#O{!4tGpE$sGfd8tsRmJcmOX5@hR*rx0-d}k9 zDBq_bJb?4ue@*W@=)=-xp@i`4xuTvJ|16>SD7A#^iVFL=|4Co8b91bOn}D-_I_l3q zi<9si~&%O69Dg%q3)aI!3*J$_C6Le6+0g}aIMSo&GeJxotWPk;P-E?^|>XF_ZE!j z+#kQS;;*N2Jo0#DFDCqYZq@KEa(i{*JjZkAc@rXd5NsL|a^xd!)+iOkkpvzXkeC;H8aQ7WMq9 z9p^dTn%DXHjRIz&fc&dNy>R)pua>(b$D0T89B)VbCzIuPa{>1wePeWiq6H=WSvb$} z*6>t|I)x-$TSC~!@mA@NOaB!H9&Vqo&&BgT@DCIi{a%rL;!O*_1-yED7CI{A#+$|u zoXaz;MX{~&eA@vzH_|ozGG49-dAiTZ{Yw_&&V}m_FZh4Ad9g+%{r`NQljp?&@PBOZ zu$Vqs6?IU(XnCGmQut@(Pq(&J29I!l&XVKu)c9><K#uEqai2}M zrR!FW4f0N;eH@jZ$4m0*it_#b{isU`63*8ddhC~dGJ05rc$>&S6t|Iin~%$hw8Jl& zPxyI8!H%Bi>A_Q#7XCSXe127)pGy3AAL=)V)Cm6g&SlH;{&<<64j#vg4g59*KWfVJ z3Fec3o#3Z|SF&U2WjwDS+=ugAzwuwzd#{jQXdpZYoa1A)Y2K*9xp<`C{|cGj`+eAo zp3TxX(NB`+`nO@7w@Af*%g5!)Ys@;~AJ+fFsVSv25+1;HAjkj5pI>b($CnNAPNYwE zj`Q*LEalJr1j~;aKR_$BA5A*sd`Ms4{AX5zlt0G@$6rqKf#34_g&ZG2$g9c-djg+% zBJ<6VE5e7&=XGs8_?yqTM?^M^`?`c>lO4bVyI+zET?WJ$u?}#q4iKoFGOx zF0h`+arfsZ4y{}c1J*e?ZnASiPgv?B`ZYPw>&5!kN$-FxIj(sygXnU>xb@Zzc@m z>l^Y<0O#31l@_%9imz)3=jR(8us^oT`9W&op0Iy)<%M0G|0i!RohrpyUP~$a9o5J0KS|c_=JFx^_PtD>)bHe8{{wH} znD~_IkJ>RmKNdh7ouW(0rKIjFH{iUlQ{FByVOq2Z9$4t;?0dM&Wchlwh zGGD*h(N2uB9qYLrhRPRtzK!o!xS?ld+fH%ZcDQ_0pP|WB`2MRG>Ek_X&T{`kcoxoc zKd8R0jpua>!h=u6^)%a8)bwH0b2f&GLO;t7kMHn6o@ZEqbG&p~w`Ml4Uy^=1aE`~L zZJUNR6Xv!@EpQjoV}&o5=Y7K@@4^>FJS@VE8{?4N%*B!-NRRsnTVA5+306e5kD#5_qaInFkjEJ z81ebKgZoz}_@y=%m|2X8NXai5(4PTb^`6V#D=y(doacH=EPZcs3CZs&y(mA|i)oz6 zP*TG6z}fFBvXeh41)R#O$GFM!B{TTLYOfnuS|43tDz6HB8+fO(cK*WO#UVTm=Xv~S zyW_;W{Cr#(PZ8H+JReESxSu5V8<~)g*yCw_Md}wc8NjoV&TIMa(6T6}?0+8LlPe4V z^q4xg3_nlDR#AD(JnsYV!Ak$)DhLG9r(9RJf%nxzw$meL3IDykNek7 z$Y&rWoc2xnrQgJN;(ockr5LAtW|0z~@?l(V4GVLud5>L=X{LPZ?fO2cy z93|^d$N3=A!&RE5X~>w+LHap=RaIf9?V9s0&q)a9=YrgLzuMuIlN~Z{hMWiYx3dBV z6S;pTc^l&mg+JR2YuJOw3psx$cukt`xFC-c4m_8^`=wMbzn8&vM)E$$Wn+Kr-N)0) z$o>feH`NsR7cefi%J#GWRMmw2?yiF>%J#8;^uX^Hnw~D(mx21>@=f}xI)kvw2mF)t*>z?ArNjOp@D)cM{40-( zY@e#Su>ZZokNzzn!Xq3XdYn(LB=TvcUS3_^&!~rfGkA~Zx|$V=$j7PzihV0K@HqbX zxjYs07#_Y?L-v0<_^khuzqdVCf9`XA+1ypP_he>65t+X3OpBClyV!;;uK{{|%O<~vROY<A}d<+fY4pZ$}A{;+A0_a@5mmRw8NZ-jnli%$1t`z+;ze)jK)U-yra^`}5S z1@hi&@12qC*Q5ex`zob%`c}5j$T-r0HxpxJ`?8@o1NfO6*O&9WP>w%6`n#Xr{LnA= z*V&Lu2cFU9*b=!vW&f~z*AZFo%JRnA!appps<$n&SCsN+|8RVLKl$VyIlfXM??e7~ zm)h6J@x}67KkcvAm?_s!2IRSZ;w;Su$n}#6JPmfvx;QCE_Fo$CY^1yH-fJG^Kb%jl zBkX*<`1%cbKAjBQ2>kc#@BDl}OSYf=_rm9%4zmAJA;(&>3n~T^3R0bnZUE--z>)cTo_0EWCI`HghO7zeD9xTRkGb z@B=}ibCa)3|2Sz-#g~D{rOgrL=I7;__4u8uJ8YM#zOW~V_y6x0(P_6@PtsyNJc#_V zb_+dv@IRgX_Ildy%VRzBmGAF2ga53abtcbC!pcK`sGd?3^^^)eaYFXRIqPCyFWyIy z^t4b$u6$_zt0@1Qt@~wg`AJ^iDLM|eA0L@2%d1`x_Ve{|z54EoF-F0lde;Nz>)#EP z&sCQ1Q<;JD{G@H_gsQwQLUE?8C(6(MwSixv{k}qc-71$S2z#916~AA9ghnqIq)%BN z8Q=|h^JF<%|5VgRp6>@_g5R~Kwze|PDNdF3K{->LrgOa*g}*o-BYww-B8LA`oLX>R z$j2sVM~iy!eJJ9H-|sNH_o}MuP`TwJWM`i5K)9gqr&)i8-%Bg!M{(pT99_@e==|fA z`8#KdawOf#+@9ZhpE8cM4TRkz+^6bNyO;APzbW%4d&qBDD2EC1+`jGjE$bn_IdPuk zDgJoAW-lemJ6OADz1;8kz}Hp~c*{nU*5;0>t0D$79xSC@*mJ>ODQ>@;f2#0`6GSX@ERm&_Zt(=3VDX z>>Ml42ht($Lu!Bb?pC>cmQG^5$OHN6Urv8do{y^<3HvO_r|YeRsQECLKed=Be>roZ zweoz=40#{k&(Y&)>>znQ&iz782_fIM*p(^r{S>Dn|9)S0tyvK5f$BdUxVNy7-}_+3 z3EnRh!Xx__cb+RZo?_{hdzXHyZEOAw;wL5udEUpkqWQMc&P!W6Gp>43*w6bIpSEm0 zI(7K|FMzA{z>m<0(6Rerorf#m{JI+bPxneX#x|)}Idi7@Y_mGj3P04~;Dp?tZ90^Z|Ew5%uivD$?y+UYkSf zz4AePGx)sEE{NZKcQ=1qx!z0ucVHiBa%17AUZv;MkoL)G%s9{2zgq`?vWVApN!|vW zmWbdlub4U-^=?BK;(PsG117OxWKR#QwEYIpe0}=MN|J=^^K=+-Di@ z`yzW&aNdUfd6k|&Tq0kurvlH!I_@W17Ek5tb@}=AfJM}!5AmA@x%U?&+e?Mo2gN!c zWCyRCr=Xo?fNyN~)0oJF2Le=18}w#@cduhyhCI);REi!?E+$usWJ&V6rtllmxnr7j zlIOX4=(hszZQAe$&vQvWi2lj}{ORUaW6H_p1MUX?Y(YkQeoq^XH_CpUL}?sULCy=g z08+wfo}4ZH4wXZlHbV3(b%+o;roG;_-s_{q?bncB6Z9rwXBy^*JYRnH$E`m9mvP$+ z`Sb~;wo;>wI5G4;l{Zr{KBaz}9B9z1D`9kyAAR8S{A_56y9qIR zLPdOAW(YZ+e{uPL>U6lPS|6rG{)Fp=^KT~XUb262(OB>ZH{v|EXS=INCePz24zrWDdKm}cV=Hxr$n*}|3iHDGJ$)Mrb2&)b#$*-b6&myJPXov@T+C_T*~*`Sc>$U z@V)yW(oFET&se^K=atMS`%-|bnhX1%_Nja#UN0Dgr(G81Wq-eKJKHw~xNHxXFXt!0 zFV2qU*AIbrLs5WbiVsNW{do^b3|$ef9Jlo!)RU*!^VVC zYRAg>CpbLcMjWO>-U_|x_$}+9d7~HSg?#Sw%h~gVA2{wOjdefHuig4ii1PAvat`!0 z(cFGLzjmvyCHPzpLrdWo%AcNhPSFaSWa;4ca_(``J29BwP`vQ-&Rk9h^c>k(X;ePt zj8~R39ejJz;l-Sn$Wi!LSx&;pzgEa)B8|wl5_Yg%#3%piaGrjL;!vGZUtHG>q!XdT zRk!NLcPq_nME_Hq@_S1hYlI)l7oA=sCP=8jGhYz$4(M$+sow*2Fbs#~-QNI*{I?rg zOqS)nkV{=H^q(%#eo~Y?@Bq>!*;V_;O8Rqf-qcTwvv*duK37=6EguWLy4J!U&o52i zS_F8g-XiboWBcq4MR|WanJ|dUA*>Ph^7Ers=-WK1NTaCoV4cDR-0=CM*W#q|7#a!v zEZ=hZ;(#pgX%LOqDE)F_8TUhP7Sa(<8hT~@9-P;<5%$hD)taY~^T&DK=V*Uz$7}Ht zZh`$4@UDF{vP3}%H$lH0xUbZ@>}25NPxrf`ox1vn`f!1F(c^AaG*cCI5Z?j5^Gi`r z9`GG^<{c{Li=xv!FTo1F9r^>{SMKpRP&^|q-#b;5#{$0AEc{~Ieko8QJulw@zILpT zGlAbmQ>0VLw7mSBcLXmB?_ITn->Bd8j-{M=`5y57NZsHc&>t97IyEof0G=26{ovo* zI=H;fmY1)^{K5r(4*0iXrVJ~Sl9wOA_`>6$p{?-G^+JD*Dr?Tm_kz#kf))HF!BVNp z{rcf}Q1D&g7jeI|wY)yBekYA*G||=H0tk67-u-Xx5f0RRVXNwgzSk|# zh>w{fCB8Dgz2Fx-S+8z#Mqa)$zO%sZzVUf%(e%80Wqj+}3;PF@DDY0Pw7h&}d|SZ3 z>oPqq?##5CSc?3wjBgY8JAc?$F2DC-yA|c3lIY`cv_1hHfDpk@KYFBZVSfP)ve@?c~;!F9ko&W#x3tcZke-Np!`ia_V zDop4gzxnX~lr*F|j~I`7zVWOf&$9&^{5M7Um~VVZ_~-1pIeYm18ZzGmKKsQ6eu10c z-%n&BQtDTdfu|uY-?*PfUSIR!JkKwWpF1~?-zz}&DE$)zf6vcbTk$$0XG?LQtPjG% z^Kq`1PQpHpHzR(_bxZR_3(k{#$PTp&_fL3@;D=?U)U~X0PXX8DVE&UmM2w52^}m0h zHWM0_k5e@ke&&3hJ~a&xXc*V{ksr@b>byL8YK&Ph$d6gT`98<2%@1vA3HJckT7-SK zx39kxE8zy5SIrgktU)z4r^HD(&lfG=bt|6Cs`oTjf5{f*r&;yr2Uoc?M(u|=F`fY0sy;Y$ZD#_GdxD8Equ_P3DF1nw+`{#cpc^5|$$TUD>PuBmEAOw7 zKLUz4v4KxIsr=SDm_I{r+OUPKV~`=?Hk6OsaWmuS≈8pt!K9M0vS9nb2?4#%^Li zKwUV$4B**F3odNCko`gV>AMMi?C;9gyLRLCAj(haFEjWr4l8?u89shEap?&8FQP96`nrtC+S9@`KMr{0JI>s1 z|NYO2(sI9@4mrNgIQ_VoRc$8euzrmXIMmt8M< zTpK#*+GEJ?%_2N)Y)<=9N{1xOB{I?%9Sk2>= z%r}C^_9gce{wXHK6%ZC`Ka(wG(6QX#Zw{Pb8{ezQ1XMA1+>gsFCVNqfZg`vi~QqdfmzXCwY!L z_K$k4VQLKgLbwg`9KXl9CUoX?V8YG7ok$&3B$HK=#$Z_t%uJCIUl|`p@I7+_f8;Z7 z$+I4B1AkXz+pYY@ZDo97N}fE5%uyUNOH-Y&Adptv^woP@F-I z`;&T;-{%l9_O z`YpgY&Od3~%^}6H#txj@i|^16M>tN&e_1HE3%pG))H8B?63+8$5Af+vHE$#!&I$M9 zeCj8nKbbSRZ~esFc95Xu{chOjmIeNe2P+0AnaRt!M<|XG^!Of17E*0*;h$$cdoLGZ7S!kE2XViF`F8N1zP0W??{8o!(yv_icY}X9vEmQ3-$dE( zr6~G6Klr4R{Ke~4?5{lqW_C<86B@QBUgvN`JY*f4PZsPd@(2bDzWy{(w`dqp;D@{aYT)Xk{B5nG^%qLI@h%BOKa-i>sB!t_%`L6GzJeRiSE94E(KWs+R?ee;nAMYb|fY)??%_B5E(?Rl?)r4M_FEVO&HNKuCoZqM8 zh5Uf$?RUxL58yoSOS=7fn>BLz+`w~?-mLvs4qwZJ%a7~O?5d(1`U}&Ja!e6!8X){* zh5b`z_4-@R-wK?|-?vxbxtzZaxC80@-$wP8{mc9Q*uIUU4`<5y-H`Jly?J_jJ-Pl( zuqyyOY5W&s^Q(V9>Zf9x?sH}Rx`Dzz7wW%w?ctMT|CoRW>xzDCYu_K+$>op4SGw@u zf+3!pvVI5T?a-gGYWG07{*&>&H1>b?u+qFTUFMt8zk&!{XaRk50UkofOGvWHQGFKeC8luD|q%1O$N#KyMa4^ zcWAh5tL$I)p9lVX_;a^|a{PE9XMz8`HCG;z+gEb+==PJ{^6vep@4N3UJx)pGgL zABuX_y(;|BVspz0QTgLLE+*iwjcIC=^AAA375Kb{tvku}oA!a||JeWU{p51X{&z!; z{lBntyA`tklNIt;f1mh|EFVzFf1%#_w=ACnoa@g&;;&z2|0FBoqr-$hBHvdCxBu6o z|cHk$PN6Q`PweozsVm)`)`)^(ZMMD zA;vEhyJeLKW`(~pNYp2$dCN7f7JK3cpTFY6@Iu~esu#`zY6Eg zNT0mgI7Kc$m(POyHMS}voWD;~cU#e@?^C4%R}B;PZF{Fm)bsC#n<8Hy_OWhx(|$&S48rXb z{R79}<#UfR<@mQjFZZK=KB+Q7_8*S}PVn9io{IKQS&@G_@Y{cWSXc6ohWl~OU(@)| z9XbD?BL8>SJ}4vS?*pzHF6=+B<6Vm!A9|eUe*CXv$C}CgxFsd}I;P;21p(RrHidlU zmzsZ{Uq5a}In3ZYkv?6xZOi}GkGl{z>EJKe@$+JCpK>|$&>sNran7?TazAcE9B4-f zKa3bLD6;*M>e+{OWB~rq9k?d<<2K+H;2#%zsg2x^`_K>DfmiSO>>v5LSugr|7w{`v zAH2oSwbFI4@_LkPqxA+8HDTC7QkR56R?!yn=@Yq0Y=F!sryFa==X#(*> zcuew0VLv}_@kYxsNuT|tKEt>XI6rSu>a)Q;CX9K;^6C`eRY@Rp=(4wudR8MXNdJe% z-^l(D-x+cLk=MWW$BsLy))OoDAbu+J@qOzw{5~<_;JVn*K+AJ_k|KVd^uG0sI_~!j5zxKQK0%3GeT$t^`U%W0ltwKhR7^A>xzQOx1 zvp26KtW+27OMXbz5#M%l9`aKVC<+%@Fz$h7Xw`&+B-fD1V2v-t-A8 z*=DNWAifWmUQyUJHN|Y4H{pU8_QWNR685l+>5uf5a{01RE+crKr+oXVoPQ?p6yTYU z4-e-$qVlKWJg+l9u3xl^ypO^=SJ;&X-jU7;edEod1SGG=`fUbqeU-J5`x1onK3n|? zVc*38)t{(SbLH88*^pnoX@e$K!r6Z;-!Jn8yDZQ9Y#D#6PuKM_ZhS-dF9m6#0~c1v z`jc@!73uooO+Jc~@=s%V-2YeKtz2It;h89R26)}QK9?3a#T)Mf3|<%ZXMz{=tEWw( zP56QT5})@0s?Lh`m<|4gqU$Oor7%;Z#OLP~wEqeH`ZtBW@9g+%Kk+^TG*e}Ys{N89&o!MKK0wm{)Nud`lX)R3FJ8+Cw|L% zX#LWS^CTbgL*%=e7j&9T;*LzJogP2&v)jO90^oB$UNAfOVCEZj*Ry;Ma2~@JU%p;+ zK+aJo%j@0}b_GE1YB(g&i?pqLh;_8*S>R&-Ph1PbWghp#;_5XXQRUOaF(zSe^>hZfuS#a_m>W25cs@rC{9 zhS^Q+j2nQneYZOoEB4^yse^#4Ex_5nO^@dNQDsV86PC9FXZzMv`SOqV)~svBxC=Pj zmvN?jPrui_nDu*rccc@cqi64r^_vUz57Pf+U*x$n)Zd;$DUC|L@liOu3D1H&$Ma^@ z?D-Q{UkPtV49lkq``NzBx&j~7sx_k%^s5cP*}g5)TW|c$d}|ZuZvoEsc}AWcuTLrH zVcZU!?b~qpech4&`b=W|F5uw|Lnl|wxl*w7f)e3K4V6!$!uucW>7u=zJN5Cy_;ivM z@$P}V4m>}8Uum;-VM3bV@n32md_OS_<75{2kJSx3Yn{v#De?XAACG&wal&8iKO1UD zOwG&BLOgo$9H0gK8C}XfNU}xq$^SgAaD1-2HThn*HVY~clW-5@x&CTj`J{K-j8`f# z?g!5Gx6`y|rb_$#A#imTaIU|9>n6PN%jzEC{vureFw+kxBhJd1XM@K4Ih z{WarLbGh_iOz1Kq4yQQf@yz~uqX?P&7~+NxJM?9b-QK+H)biX8BhQVoJ;wX{K8SG& z8S+!sHPMf=9|NuHj*$JB3BBy6om+0aDf^N2W`ozE^V>Jrk7TzhQOrLxfG1Cc-NW9# z8i#U-(uCtuV^|ekukSp)uaV1RgM0w>v%|P|fLtCYa6R^kSuTHGn#)7>rUU1FA7{S2 zew^!-a364DUeV+e7eVlTeQ}R7Ucz;L_;Zr5v#5Q~w+ZfuzvHs3!ai#&;g=du z4_#DY0fF*2Lyqes_3_oZF}d;@8*ujfmpvbt)DrFl&gJX1s$JiB2~P*k*H_0@dEb%B zr||*jb~Cx&)k#`OJ_wxSVaw@p>O=|G16NHJ_WR2ZRwqd~=gak1V)fsdF^K=L{gC7O zbH2H$np(nbz`6eR?3~wJz8-J_=lXM&yq+On59ooXBOO-OQK|sSNAa45I5nbvec&B^ zf9(E(E{;@@65oUGx0xUp1b_AXmIDeo^73;qZ*rjjOr9eA)c>VSZQ=0jAXg@=AL9r= z|7`|;=CaF+i&%5H^dIqg9Ev>u4Swm$>o+D_^745c;^(W=!Ed&z<)osfynG&qBF}$= zU+>=WZN&_E`Mf_N2lGdjL)g1w{<%BFb$R*9>j5M9_dm;7P(mAhJwWRX);gj+@q1}) z;FIQ1JjJj+9tShaHT3MNyXzj~8Q}9c^n0!doZSzJFQ6OjY&q9PX*4`T?;?cTpzf%7?)q2iuwsp zJVHXZ#@2e{kB3E`uzV(PUK<>EX6}kJA1?0#Jcj!Nw*U4Z^_Pn;#?)XuTT#Bm`k7~& zPG4G@^(Rji_J>b|PJZ#-*-x(@NalH}Ci!smc%hm;Xr|mBr$AnXer4mQJGXIv8fx$H zM&R6ErQ&zmvCCTugrk&7A`aqbqP*N+rGfwa*SfUJ?*UVb+E2YwDW2!6HV+deL?jqa~#{et@|p0|<4 z@VY7VBu^9en~@Su>&{l`H}O5__gIes&l?MUq5U+IM8D{{B<2~1Q#St)pG>HjXL+EH z@56jGjsfh(PNyF34peH9ADObngi}x%|YZ zbr~bh3;Epl0=OZ^`}VxPDG$^{k`D4qwxS%Vl0NG1Ja~Ug|I-bEl=t&hb4@qe7hFPW zXuR-&&(|#rQ)bmT`Qpbpj0b^pf8_hU%{xyHAHD-zt$JVB#r<8cgu?IEN!%V;S74m` zs}D1(Z~1Nb-tQnEm)%JChu6nC)nw@KwwbN;Nq$f#Yznk_i~CzsEO{Q0`B(WIA> znyx7yem@i0mkyk->oRArTzcQXWhs~62b}#gq~8ZWbiZ{vTume&1kV2HUiV?m=l^Ag zyHCPZPGLX$XP$H9OSkpeyl$b^18+ zHpsJm9}bq=MppW2lkINzt?w8VFZ z7KfcoL>$C7BR`IRGvxD+|IqUhsGn5u+BV)Ed5=lRznXNM=lOl+vHy>;?+$FT`od1z zqzzq!U6w{!kr{?iK{S9skYU(GR@h;O9d_AaNkB%~Wg3>0B>@pDL&K6Hs~|{0Mr4L1 zMb?*_`<(V9?f3h>{K2K~^PF?fIrrT8zIju>pi(O<6nH9dTHhC{zwMlg;Tgc`y`>5D zr*>6m<5~INO{!GvooQO>UiPQ|+|Td-WEmgwo9x&&qEKWA#vh3KTqr=wJt?sJ#?7kCQJ$;_Fues7KR zcho)tkDDs}q`cZwWZzM7zY+B-^(6!C8~fXj{xK7{DjxC)C}%D$x165W7VYZJE8|1; z+rSIYQ>nR1R+IIwuqP9KB!TzCu009tISXY%jMPWta9EFz>XQN??|~fEcVK9>Zroq> zH0dwdyP{*gBXox2mrs*%B6-!dxF5N^4)R8n8wdWE^}bsn??(L=;1h0Mx^hf*9nYwwU7myxPNZQQ9e}nmPzON-~mqlU2C|iFt?wcQ&LZtaVWPX ztPS^HhwEuOr5&RRA3I5BUEF>nc;jByo=WZL_aF7s`lR8I0)@DJcF5W8$>)If#^imL zn|)63hG%ZS$nA6EIz2}lXMCS-MV3?!VeD{Wb#6e5x{V|H*zGctr=_oK1Ud z;UD!&8ZXxEm|ldhUsKKm_MdfS_U+^L+o6~2kKK5b|DLx>|3{#Fr^Sorb9pDpqg-p6 z)r_~l2iM8}F|L{w0{ovT{ipeD#_UP|hHFLZ$#WVt-iKj<9v%2Q?!~)k9WL3D?+EhO z2!8e7mwy_(9vAVW{%-?sMu(LF&&#WEo#GquSbc@Z*Ng9qQ~w`TcG(Nwzih)~etMwi z?$I*u^Z1$0$@r4IwL+(VxV&ywV0`xIi(d%UN{@y8YT!ncrIvnvHjLpGT&MZ&W~QT3 zB*V#nJ9y_VKZuB8cn01ZP4<=iDC#3_AI)>revUqEjNCpq^mLQqBE$2kAfC?5u(N?>J}2}hf%oHzao+`ukJSHx zci6r11}#s8Jgs+VeEGv!>;xYl)pMoaG(JSWU!n~kA9TR8#>aLeKIY>i{f?0lyt?5B z|Ka1K%P8B=0=($PcLCpL(KZdlAFjXBk;VzX|B$n`l)TU@U2f7Droi36ozU~7NH0AZ{fRmq#{}?%t)vrvvAnl^{SLcPle#G0) z0(n|L{kQ3hO?>>Z1E=-L&g5CIdHXnlQ~b5HhI#q;ZUpW|`CG)4uH1hQ;^P5cso>ms zd_An5C;d-qBmH>%=+Ajo*Vb&ItU!2U~X2o>;UG&7U;BPqdsr z#^R^4Q~l6$_}9BnS$-?y@E+>;;&Od-WpL$y__`ra@y)x|e3-}A1DwX6nv3rgV&hZR zd&Ij=ols1)TdO@aqo;SW>=ys`*&m{F$oSAcdu853OV$kO;@>9<+z6cZ*}j*=7zeLX zH-UVp1^6~`!T0%0wXpTg8J+rx|NG>#-Xl)+KaD8({ruK7vd-O|LG^onuQI%D@kJFN zAL0(Gf56lmnpORVwk7=@;M>Io-=|9K=1muO-?NDSi}s1b`kd}}=|8*KjX!s&n=k#R z`FBK(eFc?zAsr}B`J0h<{T!aZ7RXclr|nYw#OD{PpYD_8f4h2Jm?>Mo6Y`{gbNe%= zlnkfeX?BA*wSS=^Du#P-o$j-J*1JR#{{3>&PyYWmZT?)YU%deBkMiENJd+}rej~1v ze}`U{IH_hhtzWdb&pW;M``5$G(myeO(Dza-&|^oLGUxJj`X0Mv%k>rU?eNP9zO(ew zF_8vhX6X-CgJ(pU4t|eitzPB!{cJn(h5D2FTj~G3ANF6Nd5>xl`J)Cu9=yx{b}1jD zl?;JfaGlyO|DDchu?)8Zr~G>NBCb9?uP6G4_l+EvsDD_WhdNu?j=U5#`0x-n{{qs?^!M`ir_x&j<^s5(2|NIA=KB1%Auf2c!g7OQ~ET zH7-8B7$HyoMSgXzG0%U>Z_1C4ORoHijXx@TkbIs6>M^{3P<}hX`+ezO`}q3Ejq4P@ z+26Lh&eu1jpX%RT(fcXa?}5B}k&MHPJq^$C^^anUoEOReOR1MD2KWy-((gQ0ygv6& z2i$^kX2zy^YORQ_96zXkQ2(3U=9Bv2dWrM?VTZgEWxr*;#^=#W9{nr$nmCy+HjHa- z@H;g6ZfI`jX2It%nc%05EB`0Wlce9D&xn_9v5ePm*AM66^Q8s-jPgORNi4wT>#Tg+ z1*PRCJUF%cYeTB|Q|PDmwn2a59|JF`z!kU)*QvcXTzd3??}yTXlYG6i%ZkuGO~@PJ zAK5p4)X7hIzGgx`Zi)2ok@xRB^gbRTPwhqW)ynq$o396Hy_W#_=!3^b@%0w1_Xv-A zW&V`o8N=m%gY1tj(D5zzpZ2q~9LvTk@AX?6U?1>Ilu^g?cjxsd;d)$> z^nX^7(jW5mU_7qVdh`6alT+AwMrj=>?Wgsi@#q}tF8=nlL7w{4x5b;?CxVD?5^%Er z=g-SEI;M9J$ zU6b~6`_h5adj9x|hcmc+#ugYKkmq+}YY*n}iCZT9Bl|zD^}`}=Up#Qi(-Tdu4r2Bx zz0gm;JN93Jok{4vvi%`X?SH9G(dq&151iV6{DfVddHW{-ccH8{C;uSser z)f5(gWyXZS{Oo<`R()!H$Q|Y zq21%b%LMO4#h9Py_iZR1f}b^?(73ol#%J-8^S{tOhxnrY1n`XD6)S$J7XLn&4cBSD zTRWud>;jnY{QVy|jqigE-Iwy;Eq4K@`F3%K%>@f(&zIpk%ulpFOb37QMfYEYwPdL* zMSV`Jk21mQr+=j{0-nHiE2Y12h*$jfru*X*TbGf1ePV$;`E&Hisp;WN z-U!@|vfFQ0ZWRR{5P!_)PVjo1FVsl9|CoOSKX^WOgRfsvv7`TC9VX!SAN#{h@LGI( zR6i+Fu<8o_}AZw!IHkGy>0>FKK_1I!^zT??22@ za$jp-CFA_`)Q2nh{=$jtZmcVs4r$qe?Jtz{d*(FXeCAqff+_y-#shik&kds&T;cs$ zy&C;}j$G&UFEKft@4s}wslOK)QKJ~&AGx952wwQFrJB&bMa0*F>$Lw`_^w_%`hJnX zJ@Cs8UXQ;{KZ$||0(auN4*QnlCG?hPhP#1Nf7six{IeK_>u`QY`>)-TwoeQ-%Lobm zYT)W*8HWSUR^Ja}xDMCp{I*=XiU%SYPUoja@LFYbofyS%I-jNbKbf+3F0bE>`t6X9 zd->BeUO(w~0-v6@fKtiy8*zR~^3F~Z4sv-9v;9{TAT=mALRSg5eh6cHmlNOKUW6Uw_WpAA8WwPVlyU zz2tsuR;DZbAI_)o&kg?bsK36*YmhwpSBw`H%3tJRCivS|om{Qa6H}IgZw%^By0tQH zTW*fulusMT_vaV(#|hvS>Hl_Xe((ft$93vo-zr{|D!_0WA9Oee9{qZMd<4VYkf-r? z%7yV))C^Y#^^elS4*nCy@paOEs{csDlzd8td!Szj-n$a3R_9^35!Y#aZ?tv&!$^iZ zA#VZi(g!m)6wJo6_CrS%@{{rLsBJ&a`DU2-OT>rzFU^-JFTXEB-=F3E*A4y6TFyVl z&#yeVPW`w2{LhO;qFsf2R{pP-ahP#4V<4T22%P#a)xT&}quRWF>c2+F4HU1;Jy6#*ANx+kNPjkx0pS)HMidb zIrRqV{|~R%l%@T*@ZSzx2YlJ;xeX(jejRWl@V~zwy@I~q8PFfG@3er|Ej+UqofDzy z#d9<{_V0G^x9e)vjMWfRmZCof&-X6yPwqVV2d(=^O88^JI>iItpOp@INv#jh%E#Xz zG@wl5693s7WQae7Jmn+x7xVLae+JB_7|#0D z@ETbAPvh%n%15gI*4nVkynf2ZbjVM*f3G#KpYkOWc$~h}ZN7h`d?fjY&CV9(^6}pV zju-9Phgab8q(1??LzVO1Rw0%mew2@7|J&(rZQOnv`>A)`@X*@Pye}VT`c`%;-a&AK>UVoeu{z1>#v>iWk|1+UC9=z*IOPA*R6T06) z@zpdqyPe0!205~SOvaHPnf=O?HgX*n0-x?ryfPF2_2-`p@^n9VV5PTz5m&@Fo$Q|~ z{iyfgQa|n={my+7{HWLAueaR4xJ^>dI9-AmKO3%-|4(Wy z_j3PSWIuS-Mz^}k&o2@X9~bcQEel_!{jV4g|E2W~o%61k z_AFn(d=qrOs(q2<=JTNo`qNS7`%PVi-bXF$qxBHkw`utEpZI(mw^jN@?OSPo<6~TZ zCiKRG*K+^S!FiZ}3Aj%Ck;KvM%klL_669^*-I(~>TH4=>_HbgoLhIKg@RC;6npH?k zEg?(cj~#p$ct4kHc9Hh^0{7rL?ceh)d~ZJA-&?TnwLs6?&vq?}LOuR?ZIkiPp`06k zaS-kQdH%R(N}dtCp-qe5E*g|Tf*(9zTfo2c=;y=!8?ekpQNIrB?IiGqHJGx+|K(sG zPv92p-`&7Fu1`wyKSU1PIYZjz0scwz*@yjK9tKY135|EVm#-_v#}nQ6QeF)`^G$JQ z*m$C%_lT)6UMfCnJBE*^M#x)G4n95i9v=_X59R*f1NkDO{&~pjcS6nx-ql9;*XCBg z6Y|UFHg3S{cSGKT@<86Rb9w!CTvugfvcCmCp<>{?lD<-&(@K5W&k@AqdY-g3seE2dgFYAVFCBev z@i?aTka4ExFs`iH<%r%V5-{(0x!pYi%rg7nvH`oReHTymEFH1O_k__!Od zKVf;GeJ_&_V-M$bdvP@`hC`OQdY=k z*rmTsp0C$Y97S7;PXM2OmkV;WQ%>BWc9(294kVP4{-uKV+tnIw-v0D{Ai}Tqm^YH+ zUdU;7$~f#8&?k}iGhOLG{Z*?rYs%&IkTaoty>fd7?`MXf_En8<|D56@+TRK}2g-t{ zEz|hAAO+W{eLk9U|I<7yfAn~7DaAj1u}#bMtIJ6Hz0ecBs$xUeAtUtI2FpUuIB$N$z=jIK@-c zN57A3*e&Bk_nQ`v>9ICApM^dxcxIFX_beJu_YVY4>vGcfU{b9Kq(|T>u$R^qKbWkG z!nCqQ1nxQ+*uDeG?={moZf@=Cg&hY!_;g96fm&9UxwWrmkMuJ%?$$gyA0a7Gf6^&g zKjok0-&O(lwXBe*bKs%>4w)B*dbxcD@Ej-~O}jgc&J(CU&QF6MDd1lTy|N*i z*@`%3fIr~noh_6{Tz_yrX?~FYf4`{encVV;#&-jF`f8DxJf93R0>}3Sla@cGd=l|< zK#tn?-LZuCdHbdY$v56sHJZz(L7w9K&#YHpP<(~{(3!p@O-MSJeJ#)c)WnIlr?6k5@u}j`nxS_%uEI-Ap=9 z;PzT!hXK3?U$~sSf2SZ%t-wp0uWI>yK|6j&M1%47(b27HKL4aZ&H=ns-Hb|ne$gG0 z`9<^Fg6iL{;PX=&|YHQN))=NEeKv}T|5^UB4;Mftvy+MmX!whJGI^YO_9Ir4AC zfMNN$e|o}Eb~$?{u>fmt2d>ln_G7&&a|*Kg%>lbp!1HXZ^0W}g5#Kc6$5)PgQ8*jV zdXB8EHR%{?#51gJO+gfqo?w)r? zn}LU#fYbLyOSV@JdR_AOc;G5i(D+@W!;=+Ctw81a#nD@?PaV+n$F_B)Ra!qR?8{!? z!Ow;ttbfeqHJD#%{1~qL^FKa*Q2TkIe^Qwt6S+Le(fIK!_IgZ+A-jJ4k1{^Aepp!b zyKywW@cu~a2NU=aQ);)R{jby}*LT6|2P^m^E?l`w`%mKg$0y*)D5u^1{C9dDQQ&Ft zD-HPf!@gQZ^MJrpfO~=W?XUYWR-5e~#fRdbelDaakH7u^{D*v<3DH$ZUW{+F9x#DN z>w$>7_t^1SWD8BIe`@mi z82*)nsr^HSz!g79e<+_j9gp18r2WoL!bTq+ss&z4T=0E1?X;He-t$FO z@qd3jk}%>TjvwKXeSM zLHE}sJNN#U0sh3yzsf`zh$%~d{D5nImi|XR+Wmbrcmg*7Hvr$!^!|_-hLitV@Xjx^ z@8td`LXPB1b-4P7#iAZ*t&Eo$yi}BLUyhtk_j`rCUR zL`}B6S??!{$9uP9i`{k~_@JME3iQc`=u>4J==~~rH(V-ExnuNbVS~U;!0G$`)vJCm zz%YJO)_d%%!0G$`X{#puRdQgQ3-X~3;MAX|?Ks?G_U&`qNPh~|KT*!}g*$I9dgSh{ zON6HZr~cgUi+VK@kNtIr^m~DSA};toQ--E>nyvbV`g2x)r}qIIJ6@pj_|i!~2(E}9 z^;de1Wo*T7j?(@@;MCrxUu2vvhiur+pA(^cr}t@Twho*UVinq@eh1_z-?c@5ni>W? zxA`Rn{OC0?%OlNxHCg`%e(?N~27Z)ten^xli|YT6u-^(?aY)+V>1^%o{5ccypZe?b znFB|MnWY{fPveCN^3Url_A41q{#)^V*m3XAJP?w|-~ViEl{Xs?rF^feke`vW|7*A6#M0~H zFP}eI`TjZZ-81UTM%MAWs z11r3ZOhlz9a?965@W-W2TNV}6zM_6QkIcaL)|T78_=>N`Gayg-cGPixf)e%md!9LDlG>cnQ7&JnEkr;18Yn;n%t4 zUk36^^Q(-{y~{^aHD>9b(5J_Ep+|o(fLHNR#k~1Ul1Kjvz6N}n56$48IsVVG{03sm zQp87t@!A1i+?;zq764D^Ghkh#!2FsD-jN=*m2^Lev&kW!VtbJ)<5e?NWOTiD`Pn*Fn(sbgnxInspzVTuo z=K!yM(yJ15KS}7L??J`kygwDZ{FC2(o7;UPFYXUyfR`sv<~e#ERK%Ok|83BBB;Sew zJfEq*>D@9OUr$S(#rvBH*J(WJbAIM!em+j~qZPbo^TR$kSvSub{}C%bd~nq$&0vOlxw*j~Bm*MoPXyP+u8Pv`%n-|@+* zYoy=TUfJjWkf-zimL;cNrZ`d>1n}wnA98!Te|YA9p8tdQ>G?x@RZu9}H|zW#_{NH< zRXFa&bsHsGogI)(}ar=tbRKGr}$jDJbWm{N7!eD zoC9Uq`FbBNo&S^mt(W3EaQ#{5|Ikx?*|CYV-{SF31FktCAb5O915Xpbz>=2|i?xRa`#&#uwQhbAPs5gfJiz%s#dCPr9X-WU)JOY$!$}z@ znkPFZv=|kf&qALTJTuDIEAp4m$Lz^E{|CO$eRw135%SdkX1J@lWKJClN+DL-wg0ABmd|{dBpj_`K0+> z`adta^}XEkiN<#Wc=f%Dr}BKF^M8s@@7ej!^Y}O*N9{YMRKK>oed+w4n;TKY%l|HT_`Tck3`hzNP|PY+(Fw2|`y&i`?p z&i_4so+=&zdC^~Tod1L0t@^PU|MUDGyi*-|mdW+}AO56**YW*Y|K>JcWu5^N)(j-{DvI{@LDIdY|Hz13i8wnyus^xz4`fg*7-mB z??1)H?c(!K3gl>h_+)zJ^L&2EI{!z19WpBN9G{=kAn!#Pb35e+KEGt0|DTb5zD?a- z+<*At^O3hdjdwdvJ1g<=$pks_?_S43UvU5QgrodU-@+Sk{*UW4zg2EkBr4$iA9kmJ zrwqH^Ea3bf@l69>am=eke*SO5de#2|M4wMR-hWf<)Vosjo&=Q%c|rZ}&gs*mlv>%q z!hhP|>;I7PnOSIcS$;lD{UZ%_Xsvr@ad}!_k$&54V^Q9}N!|hd)qCeJz~%KgclIJb z@(t^-l=?RxKWY9>gPyGoyMFvX&)< z1Ng!L`gR9zR(%CLYd)v*@Aq$gu%6aqyuT&Gj!A<<$MW-U$|sV4bEo5!+~hMLAJXU1 zS}w0RFa4wWHrY8LAI-C({#3|m!K+xS_U3@|a~emnKL2=roeh+aLZ14I8SZ4=&s2Dy>gNyeJ+H*s*f-^b!30*n#sC zYVVRaXBW=(d>G?n8uS#s^zHNic|J_zANZdl(uCH$jf%r?>ie4axI-wSq_a zT42B}Q*P&Pdg7s+HTqO)!1*t()A&4UXSZf~v+d2w$G&i~Zs)i0c(0We?K8|(sTyBT zrQmr!TJN9flGLBC_fw&t&R5$HjCw`+BK%7Ro`Ev0ecc91*zLo!-g`y&o31aa`KHj5 zp3Q_yK0HMGr}UTZA9w$FSKhI^?W+hk0H^y+gYvv>H=@lK{^3FBHv=Cm1bm;QGuNM$ zIURmd{NInilIO=%f6ApQb(R)ua0hrua!~z!=8V5(=sau$;i*COZ!fxk(WGAe2@lNx zK12xkJ~P7iE`C+$)I0HiU;Qe2FC@i3<1@vP^O{9mN?Re#Xt?lNaWf!V(Q z`tv`T;(+m?ecp-&RknQAd`x70h*BOGz}_rG6c-c!8e|J{9x_umZ2k^bIki=(-HslXK((*D-( z?)Hv=ex6@i;FMpNTkV;u4r+g4kFB|UUx@*H zYoE2&@%e?``(c25K2kT3E@555(=H}0dcMZgpK60!d>U>}hTo}=r)YjOHO zeS&WWpZ3qG;D0gjyJ|(XfqYTF0emlbKh!B!tQdGgp9cGII!D+3E&Xp}`QvDDO`tx( z4?Zt5fS=j2*J65~3Q39jy*Q__f_G@h{SzgjSLmbhItlmVlEI7G+V2g0zl-bBU_Y7) z-r;;5;^}){{@=3+`hJm+72i8b*)IL^LQZp2{w;9vJtZCc+h4$BEET1+nGbGd`r39|MCF4N*b5+OWvtbN30C#ne<5}~cU7h%T z%?zCS|H&i$2C1^;m7ZGCe*0Kiwt4q-E&qMNWXRL=LbHn6u7}vN?Mnqt`>m0!Msx^e zcm{A<-yAsOJD*^<;&z~a7px^GD;cf@PV-l6(bY3lz(pRUjgrq_CZZk#_zN0FPYJh3 zJLzA+H-Vpm(hPpb^f~1t5{M~F!PkTa=9vTh>QAB;s*QnpBlupk2QPF+Kl|=aGl5&z8JHqg=m+`09te zO6`$;P#(qZ>DVsRl8sY8q2C3yKMLC&nwX6nAy0W)xa`Ld_&jL=ZW}Gzr^Kn+?UYR3 z4xIK0XEqGFr(!tugEahZ$?2($CWJV%>vuz*)@i419S8|!xCc1R3zt51gpS2>!!Y17_0ic}i>LIy^Y9E#ObPb>r6vdthGp z^oIxMbrSe4b;=;MuRjKkpT6%4!wxri9(#0p9v@G9#JCoZ@s8TN@Auy&hgq}nxVwl4 zcvDv_>8E6PJaB5Sm%p^DsbYBg7&$IbzDzlBVo#{gFYyue+aOQ*a;c8-Q5eJ3u$$U* zX4qjhZx2^c{jOT`9<%lcr}$F+>EMT$UrZ705ge~1;F&19*K4_!{jQ%U&ebfUX)*&TN|H-Fn=ijC|)N+qq^|?vqPTz?Ow*)i2LgVPV(D_SDw%PrE!e> zb%TF(`qoXk`D+30LHS3u+4q^hs<`{oA8MZ(O$!?6cV$Js(|ttR7t{RsM0d>+k|Nug z{^fkjS{X;<7!cjdhpno3Mra=vZ7JP|9{cJp2@S{wnV}0-YU>AtXma9) zzOufPGq&Fg(Mmkdr>6{D7(4%gSD}~Jx!*~s*ELSc*V1lp7YZJE?~{5NjX$W2!r!LB z!}<>IJ9tpnUUc%~_bco9?hNSvedCFf&y>BU2r=Q874tH+)2xfS*VH}&*FTi;AiUC~ zUkiq%%1VVjR6muG5>k9MVt9|i1AB3EM15KISfRIBh&FWg6Zz`;|D~^6&%xH=y?Xv% z^`%1J2Gh|c7blLtEX)x0XD*O=LV5Le%Y@{R3~8jmHID-QJ2Rl*x0G)J*8?Z{VK=MJ z3uE%8AoGx-0JH%{p7{Oi#%Z7xiyFMJYlsRHMo4w~px zB<73@^;;^Fql;Fj{tMB7IA)?A&0`sd;_rSs84A6`=W#TE*P~^LkHf$dxE0r_|7f19 z`&Y?u2XK;~GXBU;6~j}4n<(C(Fo6J~K zbn$P7455bS5#h~Yl$^U=WpE2=q)dAdq zvcRU$yh_v~^U#d|0>ZHbt`Zm&b+1X^P7&#p&`P`oOqwzTv5iO9ILs$M0+pgDVt8hdywf$IT{v(NN6H&2sb3Bo-figc zzJvN?1<_|Tk7N8Z>E9_wWb6t>eZ&{>qIF3! zcom!V?HC50z$sp7z<+G>a*LATUR)=CopYkAs2HyKSH^?nd%PE$Kb+xu;3ThE?u?57 zF5*JptGaROq*{@d-OjXLvO@m;tb*ww3@5woz@L{W*EE#j&Y*e^PS<=D#&9=qk}v+v zuTPW=_XNqi?_E5h0`9Z&Wg!Ha%7XZNsBc~#*=^A9219+zsUCfY4P=SW^IrEt#%)`^ zbGv`sHrYRHh)yVVH-zC7k0juO_Kp}B%5WF1Q#-7gTBAT1 z!_$G2{H|&r7F9AlGe}@2RBzKeX2{t8Xaf(};q{AwE;aVZ&cDoAzz@ zb3YMA5eNGI(W7b2{!w^k9C&}RLyp$F#j4!A910$qLe!I$-^t*&{`AYcVc-co4c93y z=FJP5DjDttPV#>@=<Uk4$^1av}SRv;Df7r!^?=;q& z{ABP=DC1s9f5)`>?&o~woP13X-w6K0l$ihWn*#YFZ?*V+8S6T^KN+02!<|t7Dny|W zIPLqL(9?I9(Nye z*MZlm`Ip^PkmvoF<~`aUEx47a4xaafKV**u`ZiRlJ1G=#5qJ`=(|OxkM%PL2;rB}-(d z-6&hm%F{fG;k5oD|0@rdoI8;6JX@Ip4rWfBBwUl;fC)j|cS{ z!5eU}>$GTw>u{aU*Dtlg zf^)Y7@XwT8P_LjNa6S-x8~8Tx?cn!1FebW?J|{l``~*5T1b?Y+mG3>MIr%P}f5wCF z0sl?@KlMd4Ir%p5JvbMR3zc!{*Lcqju`c2tVSgshcU|Bc!Pj4y(yXYLv;F4`;ZE?~ zC~e@^T6C*Yv5cI29e8%=cY?3{xBTSdn3qUO*rOgQ+be<2wZZRJyoR$xDlug#`02P$ zMfsr)lm4Eot!_~=B`4nnKHV3L2Y*ZDx{CLbbMljd_!jVMFSxzyeMcZ)*SAXdFN3dX5-3?#WFs0U-9Ji+GnM9=vPYr z>HfkOrqj0r?*9R&@%i$tuU`k;{{v3-_qnC`U709r5cb=F(>iC+;|32@3|AA5a#V8T zL#1H9XfL`Coq+o{Zt%XySHoT!_hDphGT-R_P{Kob-`)d$?P|{rWo(Loj28A~;(k<| zO2(n=o>{+?_3^|<;6_}h@v+AByN+@Uw*V*qn~Z6CMaOVEa2g-q*x!x$h~ZA)6rU1p zcO5DZocmAr;oach?00x)1&g$k{uTV-`|uv{UtMifw_*Y@WhwX+FS<`27cS%A7`~uK zC1YT`1V8wGr4jrC(d|c8j?c-b`&Xpj2L7E{-}SAc%gGPE5AOuOla`na6@;QR3D z;IG(n&0JL-$QSq7={`Ik+4KsfB8BdwM@awaIg@z&&H29PO+rk#E+XlRON2XK-p^5g zBFlLEZhM&?4YS^>NzoU48~8~m9ncrM;qM&pixtlgSo6t#Om?KQ`o(iIUi|Hf3gi)A zMU}HsJU63JOMk^>QI9+5IU*YOB<_2^c#70d?~h-*=7%)e1&jCw%L_RX-vrcSLrL*X z!rx@4;EVXC1lgsl6zG>`z3ktD@9U?b&Z!b#^lg z>-`0y-&i3}adY7B2I(L6RSG5S<9{9`$X@}A_VFSvDUi=VDR5uhLNnRlV*JwFmT@sA zNW0oENj)EK7Hm1bDe!%c6s64D-9^uaD$Raa#5L=CD;~%f|7G+r_MDSStCDgwKIZ#$ zNQW>(w!A%3#+}AD!^20hN`_kqM;Q{@xJPTZ1^%1WrjKGYIr+i%c)(AX()~Q$Ga)IFPsX4;i;L#t zfiHjV2IfzLCdWSK`C|c};@_tI{9h>kzWh;o-k0(rs5JDW{%f=A_nm)0p7viY5~mjo zF-wNXKR0mNA1RllbP8p-2RP;5!54p34r91FM*2hZZ{cU3t>F2s15Wez+18`JQ89TV zaLV7!+gq*X{@YQ%1-zoA%mwl=`Q&@jf9hXzE>3sy`kj!Y{O|u>J#1`fnxm z*%Zd)&0bl*1-yE%I(@5TIMq+_P4l|ug=iK2kEq`XIcmTEQmVHKHDu#%;M9Jh)y7N< z7+-*UP(J-)n^%=6Xk zUE_QU!r1t&Lwv~o*wGy~@ceQ@p4xZgv-#6_e%T@K25;@{)su5;Uy82>ypV4az6j5y zeS^nSbv_xFe$E1U$#34icIb--ubIJ_pYnkFPx<@j_?N%&{G|M+{&jfIpqe4DOUOH+ zm-^Q_`@gPGhP#1NeCG~WHh@3RNBz$OUaunuJ^Xn-lBeQ^k0XvNlcY` z^t_+w55e=N5xftso*PW#U_iWJhXuTUdT%;QaTWe*@x7KLJU2T=`CwlN6bRe}IW_Y3 z@x!r6e7sBoo{nJu-2f{7qQW`Wo+#7T6b8K>B@A`L8O{EDaF#$KyKX>x5Z% zmPRq$h;X#M2`|N5=_edv7{B$b;z>EPcl?cG$Eh$zLnI(WS!ApbfD z^SHW@^gkY@z{R@S#Qyfx8{a!Mzi_89fPLTg}Uqa%c%0x}z zx^mEhS&sxJKB6Bhil7~P%JoU(2g`iVHOY^E90H!uOX7F;-~5ixYpyBsenC9scNpxi zxx4}LW|U>~G^#>A3jHZ~o?X2{>Tggj)6MlKLyp>Q%&;#8viH#`)rAB7`}1PQ}_ccr0joV1Np7phDbDk^ao#j~ z;eO_yGPOfsd;XU>X#~vk=W7!3ECupUk8G;IiUrkJ!#^PA-LYd*a-Ti<09Pt6kOL7mvLBsZ}@7S zA12^>;Mc#uq4mE^!PiJUe@wugU1DcMq5%bN?kD3){dq-)HFszn7Pxkh#2t`N8#yI| z#$SK?{4Vhn;9-|87U$zZe9-S^c3rG_!1KpTc3~e-He}a4UVj>JO$q7$d)*DKXuRP5 z>47hMP~@Qs5Q7m5_7$>yv$$0dwd%GJw6DHc*1l$0;b*UGF=sx~ zMdwQb*8ooh9=S8DCq29Cb1RhFEY=a;p!r^y>R(4-U62etsVLJ>(ikN8VjbbZb@8`Y zM`$X`cDHnlO zp7GAxg=U5t1S)YC^wIvPSfkk|!wi1dFP~0!V4N$r`{y@G;9^~#1l$uRh*n+Z5E!PVj|VU;LEnDzcqDBV<{<>wCxvnp^ZQ=8+z(e9nN&o3S(7~ejORQ_Y;5)+Ofzy4UYX6zfkI3j&3V3J&@Rs6& z?^7#bf4e)!lz)i-i~OeV(^7u_ld>u{)F4oaCqbU#TXK8cu`q)l_RG6~lf16U=E0QT zLVr4NivNSh2UhU*)8T$Meeb<}|Gu3Gw*#-Q|2xu3!rRU%vj{$Ds^Qg?t9eUHhli<^4oaPTEg-y#3z( zXx>k>z$uR}EVuqd`6=wz#>n}D&RzG`>60gf^#e2HsXe-ESz+Y;EHSA5nlU$8@qU&x zOtwohcq_X9JeT*g)S&u9G9AD0`ZI#+*L?Hmm%RQ|;0m3LLy1{mmuLMn>%NEqJS})1 z9v&M{s+3%q8|q5tI#Lbmx+|OAIUgr+sJ){9)EK^Vtr}E zbs;bMfhVXRIB_m0aB)s&iInY3Ydy-hC6?EQ5cnnhp>sMKhn%SAyt~jt+Q$f;;*+cY z;1_NE}ZY0+o0Q@N~#O>h|KpFoPfV%V*-c zzJ$~>;m!4?d|c4teI_(6JZe7H!~11?1sMmLKQp@)zsUP#0&ueL>c8WT@qR_?8yk2u zek2YaS0NnZhqPAqD|+5EDTu%QC)=!uT=-_3E5?EEM!B@I=7Jh=;QC#N2ffE86a4Sn ze!oM!Z#;y^zS5UhIo89viZUMe^e?YPYIE{~pT9}~-*KXR<=ozz65Ma?;Loc)r)F;N zO`-KJy*I@LzA#(lOOjLeFN*V{!lrs5c+O4W=|TASc};UUuB(K8|BcjhC}r}RP>awm z^{em7@qpG#hGp6zp=LkquiprH3(8X!tHy>gd3%ulQxCUaQ8JwLQ$B89SGo$9E_t|H^m<^KKMk;oGTK7t?IzjWa1o4@KGWhAC71wXidC4hfs z+zBYY&pIu*j;>mxo#NLNfIH ze!BPeC+p|l5F{}!rQtfAf6+PH)Nf{~=$x1oih0?FeKOhUW%h}@kN-xlW9YnZ`FlT{ zrFqt$H$n9os>(PN|K>*r#e(V+aSX0cV8RY97m{%&`C7WF8ZPgGd|FZI zcjs5VZ*c!IaQ}tw!<2qJ_73?X^ru5U6Xk;ghxXB$MBqtyPLuNJha(3!a{2h`(tpz5 zve*9E{2VO~cmm3As@C2{YahRU)N2Diw|qVgi+@)8(S4?e?=?yf@So~O{AT~M^8!0} zReB2qw%_qHsmBq1fBU3EJ`?5ca_vU&_*45?aX!1_c7t-#O=$39NlNw z^2wW@#kr*T`0WF3g?}N>de-Ol$JIptM_Hu(nk(EtijN8Y|I+7FXI{Szax^|Kep%FA0`33+S{*8r#zI=mhp~5QL@O&fl z#5WIN9??P0h*IEU-ZHblMcgxI%W>VkQI>`7kNlYBz0%n{uwNFfJe+=-)Ss6Q=u1JF z_q!!^__&mY>yF>#zRq>K*cqi>IwI<)`+HvSY;B&K>AYXy+KaOOIH&BFhnAJu6~W~7 zpUC*w=SusHO=G^La}6P{0d7KB&3Pe1?4QI(tWPXXDM!zNTfw_r^xU6f-^4$HZv>y7 zt8{?hv+*BGbNjs}U6B4%@W-_=G^6p0>JaOQ%%F9I7kt4H{?Ph|{CU`QWCP|;c(6Z) z+A=tCf6U-tY_VrfF8+iE`{MvV<=ayGgZ&YC8tjks!?(VITq;U0N`Z?! zRo9Vri@!zOgU?w^wdFb^reNko8b<_Id;~vuJsl5y8*5IRA=ZJE>LC?}kqoZ=MGsk&Y2Kb})75P55^=h!4!hW&tPlBB0 zQyDjsHQ;aVuUPjd;JWlbH0wP!#^o{&U2hMp7s~osGM<;C@6Wf{kXa$bA*5wq((e|y zpts*Q{Zye0*ZwK{FUh~W-n<5v&xD*6>*T!uocx)~$JLd7(et?5YUUpu#`MPnr~P!L zyE_^v8J+-~&Kv&Twn438cslC0fwy2omCfM{C;R9;;bNENW^SJga&#WBE^X2sZeKcZ z+E0IdX2mXUUnX$Mt3E>t%;EMWk^awQ9Qt)RVvb<;(f5VofzP_qs{*|b-al?6%JG-t ztDkgiRam0G`TXOG4RYk)*XyPfS2CQQGfD#QLM8nw6~n3h)q~}DT5ffG;%r*G>5TSUlRj(b?-No-a=DDIb={Y}`Wm;FDKcY6s4zjxxn& zlGQ@Lhw4LroiJj{GCm)u8%XJ>Fl8z^OlnulHQ${lx;D z`rCkN%iHq)YzI!`;je11hWBSDa2l@;-Wl`(?{9A4G+r!kUgdKhKM!!~&kL&Wp3VE4 z8}U(pA>)wnuf2biLq<@V_TW_0bkcUAy4h|U-RCkfcXUXNt5uNirx3MHA0iK?e_%9|4=yLVi?2K4W-`{ zf91yYVM>P6c&h`?uwv$d}^_I<8MX~FeV z{Z8=a)jz8a&!v7no~wFsc50gd{~<^DxmxwQ47X3+NcvCt)BC$iUvvB1kk^6t_UqM= z5v+bAa3k=-@AaOhW;m_q=>1Z2A}34;Nm2MeBEKkpcF6y7+!+tR7cr`JM=~p)n?Em}keqBzEA1-J+0Ck@8b zkAQt*zN7CyTHuG;DC03D`EpDiw4-b-|9&Stc)rkqzozGhy{TUlU$n0q{VxH$Q}35t zo7?yjhjl}pX(PMv@zDvn1dK0d4{VF)<69i9R|m;?pib;h3O+u2AW!kHR;cR?K0d3P zNPlU3Ty5%nk=IY_VI6oAVxr>%#$V_+0{1*_W#!`^jc>GGeg0n4^?ZJ@Lyq$6-Iy~= z0_;b-ko~i(emRKeha2*gA8%@C+w%PI0H^%;rPzkOx#frYOBshFfA2n$TYeZ}hYq~i z>(Y)ctL-tAM|}QqAwS0aGo~Y-AKj3P zM}8P@w0+InCq8IDRPn2EO#<4#X<+;RQoQf1T-zVKq4A#vw7&=S8-X{RSh66`Pip@J z*dLqXb@TSMLypGhwSAxG53mpYmfF9hH9^7K*A01U-)`62Zq2QIJ>cn1{_=Nj?W?2y z-%Q5iqY{I@%dLHBJxc!Q!0#Kg!j)_LqTU4Xn(c1;8E;>T5A9d3+`QMB_YWuJXngE4 z#@dd@&+Cx$E{*S-dnw^ZA+NX?(di=jeSdZ-Ja0Wyj5JchmeT`V;LJC_YZ`y7c(u3FVoz zMy{vb@YfBV%lJzLY8PQIeZSU){Y3RObKCNG$F-30u%X|~Yxvnv-rq8zHy*sq*jUhFg$NF7R62Q9X-gxD)*` z9k{hbwF-F|o{8(!Us4o1KGiVXLgVFEG7e!Imha5Ra688Pc;LOOecU%c!xM0w#^Yz6 zL5~YC+>ZIs2HxF9wVM}YxDI#{@QLfr?J5ME=R?;17rY&3M$IprNSPo@!KeP3wf_ab z*sm4bMXWjbG=698e@!wDl?!fe7H7`M4_*(%gTLJ|zh6;PPCn&x*8Ug#RjK7_7Bl4J zll@uyU+~ZOxw@&iJ|~~-&)WZj-=WKaUrK0m@`LTq1i#_p!n5f2*hosmGsph7rHoId z#dG!IciBRS>?_5&bnyOHz+zu)$G$58@^+L07w6K+>~GO;>HbNoU9NL_OwO}_>hj@A zebD`r_?K;q2wmdiAE%(ti?VFNgFE;>OVdjFVf~axf21G2=fF{q0rFOq0vCC1XMc-02KO&( z7a7+lhdOQ)_ZleYNq>4!y)LHD7ssske*I=`w@b)$TXV{FMA@;bl=nT~)K>aM-}kuD z<9y+*Rli(KxDGgd-{axZ=Z}7^oT&vKY6MRAYfA1ezWld^8%F_GdJ<%RO~-pEFCX9N zd+JMmL_6CdPyMEkdd~0=Z5AF%^^^W%{k^51zU=!}FnsbMZphR3VMe5`G(7wBMq9!? z!0G!i-y|)1dw#+)#w~B>pePQ#)|_9ZCA$!gscmHlbR<%KnIWIpL2J za&hKY7x*}nj_b7k7_WY|RjHLaguFSg%qLpU&3tc6`4Dq9u6`lgi`JWKErZ8}TC?%^ z_A*|ifADzwnlOed@SJD@cpc83|5nLx8?Kw5$$EMge=<-7T*QN(izoY%z_0SA{OEAl zDXo#?L>zDz%36a)c8&l~_)GS9fL|YYsh67L&!ru-UP&0R`Mpr!x!IEpy9fSwdU+Ul z3VcL;x&#>?Bg*TiPkgKdkK1Dd-f%&rTg7mar})i3di3{Qfb3+3?5oBpD>2>ohY zPe(aq$DBraATRt;uaN%gP-cQRd+!AW3+*M;a?`@H+VG$WFCwKPvD75Wqwn8 z=Ku8O?hu329{&?U?C@t+bc2=T(-X0WR7kE`%1&+{qM1has2d@Xy!SA>KZr5-v zF=Z*@laBbPJ4*jm74|I63!cDJlBEB%e<)OONP`fxtH2W=NB%9mnRYxBxUffo-_51x zdu`zFsPpP`8pp^gp)VeI63Ud52k&ZNkI-kqc<8|I@VdeKk-cZm~mam3%}_5Q@Ru>x3zNL z_%H$bK0aKTiQo4nJ;e`~+aXaYpA3DeD0lvsxL*l^(4Ssbwv%@Qi$CY;`B&OS@%!$!vj?}|79;&PBEB1DA0N)`S9Fp7Q~XwcQ`pGu z*Bz4jN&e94R&BVv7V-v^W!JhcaQ_H5121OQ@8JGrz^_E$pH+z$ujBQ9MEfO^e(>^E z+Na^q=~8@B!MoJ`!U+Bxs5U6R#=56FbNflZqN|L25qrm~sL3=*Ja}vnUXQuO;d448Cp2m?pk!8n(p+AfGP=2L?*Q4`= z(@KVC;5y}Z&&w0~tALAffYuq5KMJ#qL+5^nuTndrIsE-Kk@SK0m3G-e-d^;66%+7U zeGA%ii>DR%^0y;QJf3FgPei<8hi|IH^`}5ii?aW$GiAAcsy_|5W_{~vTtDTD7kG~{ z`})xHm?ECkpHkkF{pS1SW7pEyBXGkU+1`XF9id+zlH(EeH&Ztm#{w(H_h;>?bT^jr zq_dCu-e?|QE94v~5A}Xw;rT@Uk@R=!+iWG%?|aXutTzp1@!qMuc)k;O!R&xwug>4%T0)Kj-$5 zeh1_icDgYnH~lHV&t#OW#`RNwr1n|0Vni~MLep!Lisxy9>raKBAJnO_n73aVSdicKE+f6%+gV zukrJL$~tFqK%UN-9zH5%ukO0g2KgV70-Vm7>K~Zh>)FwAU4e(D0l$i*`M&cMO^>vw z9|w=b{ne*dqHq+iol`cL(5srhf=Ir_W)SA_cP577gs`ukVj-8-||nx9F( z3HUYCzb__9f9pl)5a3zQxlsH<$`nZE@pC{vYhQWAHlFsgBEM3AQ~NC3-T3`*z0fY# zA0$uf`LhR2;XHr5kf-)3f8l7OaIIflA@q~{|6%O91DmS8f08C`Xc=Lb9YCNmgRBA~ zVHXe#OA88w9d_6i1;dhpAQ2G?GRm~<$Sf*QnPrDvL7+0EAVSzJ^OuwRIqB_7zTe;X z{n6XJ&*z+b&bjA~ci+nk?|WUWHDrX&l8u`NiTJSoTeZKB4wdkx4M=anCo!4hr2v0lQte|ezihnWS}BLCdG2duP zL+vBG8&;}cUPTAt7T`QTq<^)&b3eU<l-;-XJ|*WLKbOM(M`sjUox^{~vHm4_x_ENr z4{$fiBEQtL%lXIS8;_rh`<}CC(Qhd~3?qbpJih5nd#lRxFOP2~@ZO(ns+?o~#rVPc zXFAptl=WL6XGf`uOMe-L`sMM<1N)ueomdfbn)6(=h8VwMs*8LzfbRnT`X3ifxzVl? z-@ETD=2wnyI{5vExb1wM#(ZCYLB1G9invTZ`*TD2dd-7zkjJC?i(hG^^`<}HZy?_{ zw`*Rp*s|ZPR0rwje6vD-zvKi<7z`jh5$8GInpd(%$m`J*;4J^$_{!Q`Qa-y77q;)h zp#}c;T9f{C$g4)7Ur+tr7%s`1@jC=oTn~Kwb;=I*kLCjhdL;$tIp5M2?(W3j2l4p_oa49Kal1x-VH_>uQ({YnQn@5~m!kbo-Cw1X`-2&BR+PQ(STD%WYw&!)^>?Y1 zH%jhriIC&=n=`i8a#_EFag>#u_q+4+5kCKMp2v&onzL8={u|*c;Hojgzw&?2?!xmp zwXc)&AL|1ncpoeo*CW{cZ2;d4Ue?n4u|B_EQ}|=Y#2O8TjyypGJ$Xl^6@3`-;(VyJNA7w1Gs;`ob@lv_bgJX5BUDG%y)y&_unkw-x}9cmrs#z_tz*t?C77bkslE|!qz|C@@5#>O!AqDVm{^k7;hbN zK+X?~BL2e@UQUzOF9zT&e{65kW_dodd@kZ;N4e+dq%Y<53C}kyU$W!=B)NVktJpl@;9!X7;ik_zaIH?qCB1$#|wK?J`%jQ6L)^a?M&l| z0dgjkX7HaD{U$3|`+CqmR`8y*tC?0%YF{VLTQTq6*q5huAsNT`$o;S6`qiJv{m%_~ zZvWGlU#`fp9suq^xol>7MgF~*Xq8rEjC}#euIQ zE!cN7fv;+MsRlg{DjyVg1I7;s~TIc)6(MGs=)M;#u%7&uHH&Yef`u*c*W8l{doqzE|mlFF4Cx4^A z6!G|9$AL)jc^rtv=l^dUhzCzO4kY9Je;NnUfO8)Fr*WVO{405?srB)a4LN0A+i?Cr<#jyp|1~c&(f&!0yRq-!PeuMqUb>N&so;9x36RmloXT>D_I8DY^eyAZI~depBZC=X_n^)vrxZ+<%B|Utot^ zzZ3E)xIg&r7av!Yum9}8T_~RyKieor-sAp*3--;JdAX8op9gX#*k>MkID*&Rc|?xU3${V-Lo-wrtg>c1J~DkJx6&R4#_dh)Yn zdF1PNzQ16>eY6hk|J;cb_RU{>e}VB|$48BnaX0GspnP!j>=Swajqfk8{D4pYcp%Fg z9Pl4yuC~ARlH+5+c@ONUh)?LAPLXo_oseh$%GcObOl!>6&+@!K z-K4LHeF+zolwAHVCfj%&>4UmrU?J49lyU*-oNMga{G5_uK8T9-vl`e%Dbn|AIq`7 z&p6&w`pNf4?#ui8{5%{#ztH8;XI5To(D>wnJnxTp`Jqax#wxWxa2`K4I#l^|63+Wq z9`O2Bapd@&XWpOZ`X4uLzDlm&G*!ff>wkPIGgPkM0NjG|ZR49O!%)9>UiI(KJ5j$K zy!Q4Rk$j&*c$4$`#Kn0Her;=kr}@mx6eZ2u2Jq}CQ@}s`s6uJp7hx&ldw4wQCH(S$ zUnuvpk@=0x6eY#q4Zd-j;MYFUu3-W22)E!o=jUI8E4Sr+0>Zg}asNKm`sf~cf0X-| z6MCX1L>3N{^qb%p%eP;4Xncr-yA}06-Z8trJbt){K;*|JI58XZ_!LlFG>X zO# z8dq9A{dcI<<(tAOzWhB>9$(I?@c5Ut@@Zv$u9^I|K#s?s z`hB#IS^_{-yq3Ah{O99mjl%hk@e_Uf1c{KFYD) zM1SUd{Pb*%&!qK~Ki~P~vZvQ)OnUhHrbbkUoNtNH|1z!ZIvorkJRRpb-yV(VxiD19 zSJg~mKg%C^W85U~cX?nx+t<)Ff1|u!F+$#q^4FTbACmXyIbT@5>L0hO$@%Dj9Op~Q z^L?vj`*}Yk5xl{(dTr+Y5E{Qz;GY$E3d&tKpLF2ser^xqb9=MD>EIt~(R4LGC&YY; zp9A_0--tLhU)gDjyxuqCJm+hnR~IAlA|FZK3Y_Er?gu|^%qQVIAF%wops z$}8(v0XL)kv|qhr^8EoT&hvQFvE_uS^8UXAb~(VC^FicCJWo@5xiMb5;AbLu)mp6E zn%~GRB}$5i3;Y!DDutWo$oI!RIB!O~KONETuyp@d$NTR*KfYM@$9Q@CHqAynP*2sQ z^7(lGjp{c5x1iKcc#_5Y|8o90v5v5V*Xx*idL;TKdqsTSf4B5Pz2JM&Cx7SL^k%ZR z^!bnLx)kuI7?e&_hu`9F{v!VTYwdJ;+s{8+JHo>eb- z)(u>10c@cic@*`J{h;w1seYYdj_{xR z>(-c!cXenNim&s9xPQvy)%`!48|Cqe-!E%{o}a4J%+2E!$=h+B`@^Ou`P$0!w_%Ei zJFmaL*gezEzL2~N@*X^&{$a-O4)S>F2F~^w!{6MI?ehTV_9=fSZ*SQ?UcVTeA`Wlw z)=8E3ubq=~+7~{fq(ipP0y(yCMAg;>W%~>Y`4X*`Rg>kN3i+y!It`TNUBKDDlwnf~ z$o{#3vwtDRfsJJU?5rPUdZBAQWdCAH;C}jd!vF0rzEsQmHzu4nK>pCbtDT9@5Xt~ zuc_xU$LE25?|9 zf5%_CyS4NO>$XuHUR$%Vt(V_-He=6DgUEFB{*Jc(|i#xe$Rk?t9EhJoVrk@$TIB~Pb ztBY!*V0iWW$C+gCCOydtlh+X}&-2KgM!m|&-%mDR9La?I*^&{%g3U9L3BvxO6{6qr zJo8`UFuI>_twxqo91Iu-W1(kqFGGVv+kYDhTd?^6?kK0>OD_>7JA;;rE={Bdv%Kq4ayHLKFTBwP^EFwnZfeG!I zhSCjQtHsSO^K)MuU*a3UBzmfMkJ$X^5a z7Vuh@Xg8hiQ!>u)x8eEv(Zmy9%Ih@;(z9~88Ggx zf7Pi4KbPmrAK$W)XCe^9?wiGyIC*OB2Fbgi zpYNNFeXRaT+6VIAH+zV2@7js7&oh^&rlFnu*Ikc+_lO*I{JV$WHYJ?=jae-Gp~+fcfMuZ{~QzWP6s>b>sEg~ zmfIr@_5QEpKr;B;ewq0EpT>a%;M{&uOGSMC(>M?Zek^#(aUdS&|5HCt0{*}DQ$5-{ z6>_~2*WWDmU;3#F{VD_e*C$%07pGuK2lb;2^fTi!;qU3Dj&b}Pq_3aiysL`%e(laf z^}pc$PIwaJ?ciM+T=OtLALNrqKXn3c5;mf-{9KTGqNvveyh8uEuZ*yfQ$)iTby}0RKKgAkh1_k zr|P%Nw|Mg6^d1rA_iITteec!;IXmQ>C<&+cgC$9ysUCwvtfzTiZ~ez7*VRU13p>)l z=Xo@9^~i%7qYtL>D&Y5BGQnRuDeupGzeljeb+Gb%DUr*CpG8%rU($L+&17#${upZt z`}lke_(YR`--XwaY-jZ?Y17r1-)P)X{tit7^o%_|vYQ4xuA2BtJ5#{F9erRMUzaeS z+Cyn4Vf0>?ILLWWvaE51@SFW2KE2l^8t3UV`EOJDe_dRs5l;S_^5={X`(Jlv+s(oJ z=iiG;Kt0vUSMfiWLOSUnf0Xsod7nR!OF_y0c<@>2kA9`_ljJGiqLvAJ?RdT@H1*F% zY6qbLj{%?eedbL_vuPYY*e7oT&g;}wAFb>iBH{7CIiHKY{q4F|!jph=oHFJV-J_Fm zes66mcsoAXUMCbd<$ID{j7LWNUPcCZr|YGR53{Rs9K`4MU8Ua>e(P6>c*K`1Wzk!6 z(7o{u2}>O=^z-|)qQRfq^WIQ?{(_~5pD|4E`FGuI;LrShP9pD@$$X_fDQ|^c+I{BL zx*+!0MhgA*+k%%0{a?E&7!3C&A21-lj9h@DRfe}&!r9L(~3{ddUqB}1O`t&Cy% zBd(9+*`74;8b58YOe@(NnJVna1YW0IrxCii?0A^Ri1=|l+#?SCsFv{PH6k8d&%8qx zn?}N8fph(b2F@v?mGC&=+#mKlT9+!&IYK4*WZ>K$bIZNgD@?*8xqg&W zn%=ynm+<7{VxO1e*Z)FvevKvD|4hh5{v`aInD$A&T#%>sbdD17iAVgR!MhrEe^t0m z=;6P_PdbcvBM)Q2-%!lbB_fuYq9lIiLBUS|KOX!py4xLd`**0a`P@JJ??VHBYfGlvSlBa=j2o|Byi+ zIA6LjU)bIk?Ggt*Y4+x`#vLc><+WC+I?e~{`#<@Wal}Au z!KZY>dwg5}@V|XbD)>k% zk~e%I^j8w%sxpRY-8L*)_6dFT;yT0eoc+0EukTC9{V4#^;PK`>Uy^?*zrZUJnp%=K4|Qx!7P=sANCiuT^anaVQqQ;Nvg}=l5+V<2|8+wte-}R#WO*y_M3le%IAgI~zZvIKP=0;U;$KgY z|LHi-@h`M_T~#?g$+N_GtJ);|H z>%IiM7nR?mY6ZVyoy$eT&8i#+>5o#pN7V`bSBCZ5`Fox$M119YR8zqJW6!^R`97G; zPeFcX>=kkFfWId9y^8ccY`#t)8Pczu*NmG*+)gzZ^J88wN6pH;CG~f=;yTCzKGCRs zc>j~*YZ{O^lJn17U%-266Cq!2$jAo#Ts2ood}Vx7!0*34xlk@MGet>!Wqdv0e|yQ* zlAqIIDdH>RYjg?!Up0Pvh3`|!d}Vws;J;~dI*Y!au842I^{a#RC&yIJ<5eujm#+7e z@uj*c?hg3jf_yqk!fBk%lsz}RBjKFrGxmq-s0<>sGmg~<}`Xf zE=arhua7wIW5K`h=+&_x?c%>aipdc3dOY~$ie=mh(k=n^*j|cx%3jr0TZeV6uwK~D z>pwks8PNaWn~je{&CC=f`ODWYabrY3iMcE6YV!P_G1?&dd3_wSMZ_fm{CV}u-w9?9 zua6_ak3%_Wv+n({AolS3I2m>)f!}o0_N`TgQ);7{pu_m5!Xf^xm9-zxlY zW&S!bPvH6>U|fg>|H4mI67mLF?;76|?ZfL`8~7A)-@XiRIp2N1y9*v)pK&@85$|Gq!-so&WZ zcALQ`4vlx7kyt;W-rFa>xy$tu?gZbA_wlAAE#IW|juR~J0vmL)#5bBdy!qjre65KjAh(FH{NaNF|wtn|oyE7WLDiWl#1 za=mfTb97YX*BVkL9pt~VUV_R0SjZ)!0*b;-NyE_&Qaysa6ZMnY4@c zOoBY`6Ri8p@?2vkRN(x4L@IcD2fw>K#O#B;_IvNU;ykzKspx-?Y9u@ZxPG_rt6Jx% zrdr_MSY&C1D(_4q4(=-hhYi6QpB?HH7x~$GdFy@hzO)Ot1HZp=#QewW5R1@2e!7A4d>c2Rz*b(L6K=!r+IYa5 zv`2G+*W=XB43Q%5_;+axdqg~*J!^0;$aR6gUs`($ITQG&XGIQBuG^{pDAa2Ouf>2u z!}R8C`wh=T9glqk{SGM7>td?nh4Wn%^nYLwVgt@r*~_y1<+0 zdC`Nff4sQ=eY=C}waiaBcQe4RE4;t9F5mn?YN@~QdCr&q`#nQtJRSYn_`8Tx zbiHK{<$N^bJolHbrGLxfe3a)c)8Arzwt}C#PR)s&mm(Ts98&>zpj^_d{&G1#W2Oo{ z>G0bHUb7d=b1Cza;+F`X8@#J?f6Cyz^u>3d@QeL#*sI%@+#l86agWD2E_qFE>%~@! zJo0jVhZ*|*y*jT|$Ch8Lq?7+uPj4Ydf4%moSx-FlX!f6df8uOkIufqq`0zY1a`DIo zQhWIGaW>S3*(Ub#v>RIh`u+Ds+28o&?sL^vK_>m&-iG}mE+1sv?x>M)6V4kE&-lXM zKM2Xj{o_A>e`<8?~KKpS;cq zc^As#uSS*CNI35^v%J33{Hd~kZpe91e!G0{>kvtv{b&8#|9<+8tlxA%#D(QA|1s%~ zEN{m8jem!CQZCmx7=GQyP5|Vii38Oa9q`yHKu*(fzD<2nOl% zpdVS#-s#}g>^^X7F0?!ABR;RQ`F@h>knnd^`nUVSt<22U?}C0eN)!0^M<4r<-Ainbcfff8q^P{TJ zAjRVX)j-!@%5^uLr}cOY=2Iu+Q&194*I#MUXX3jR>-YG@VqPXb?boP6L|*b<7w4zh z{pUlqfmpu%K>vPC0-gtmN)_>W_bS&jqk*CgP) zkPitnP7?i=_o?FXyhPphr(UUjyCZ%xRNlCUnH_?kfPJwv=xbE_nq8yd`^F9Y9#h&E zA}&4Jd~;oG7CH%!J|g_)IQ{x2>2D2is?Tyx$gzE~;J?|w<0rmO6xzhN&f~Vbr&#xw zozf^nV-*alFG*3K>1<;E5a3jwadOUhq=J9!SokC5I)nJJU*@zg1AM*a_Bfqc)XRT~ z@86$4D*Sep75TGtcB^vAbqDcze?AU+V<6Wf@$;QwCe|!UpZ$vVj01nb&=j&ll8u+{RA25aow10@ogZ{$%^ZH}LZ?f3i9$M2UB7U*BPVX6d zUZ;W{YA*wix5%TpKQAoE?dkQ`KhJSK#zBAFq@*n&mYne+eX+n3Q2tV?z!Yt);1QmR z^L+gryEUwsPQo*Q>+!wpS+i0Hgl6Mv&IkV9SMqLq!#>vfRpGBX>bUTqzxQP+@JsBg z*>U{6Ds>ES{@&N{b64x_nzrc!$ZKrCyZ%u#o%(j`h3YYtN7TQ?`s0D~b;zaf_8i^! z^lyINU7ZA+uS3?P7i_!s?!^VHKNa{0I^jLq?7o@M(6fCp{ZH}XeI<_1d6zz1Ve*iK%%6N48-{pN`zrfOEO>YJl)tQx5%uz4;w$@09Qe<7 zEo+%8nwg>`zHRXVswe`)&89EKH2sL?69z2ulIq z^R3u_;Px9cJmG}~^Ad>s79w zzXw{l+>ts#>i7SSEZ1*^z7tiKzoV?5;;O7)_^nl$A?HLHJ5$)1g3oL(@hPrpI8UD` zuKZk4LptF-=6~OQeA0AVOZuPs3qM!H`#Sk@{n1lnCRE`3ToL!DawiTpmFLG;w}=z3 z^V_(JU(lFITF6HOk3)H*z)4q#*$4aT_Y6S$VEi21bl0!4{$$AUbxzYOy$fq3`841> zKj#~?siCYt0eB|LrDy)xAnzOSb3u`(g&$e-_dVr#k>V4L^L$_6#GkkG^E^m-$ zfAQcSFPhpdEYQDzb#*fMe}zO{qv1;SkNTC;KeB-Qj)q(Y%E+_Xe$%?zBz>lSl!X15 zvzf2MsE&x*X?5K@Z+8^>yx(^LpXW7u=9VHoIxhE(xL$d+131rXPg=ZuzInv^=OM32 z1YVR*c#p*Guj&>I|G72&PkG3Bn%GyY$1)CI`!@vR9^vVbXZ%Q5k7&NXMR}3JINl4R zIw$-+{Z*URd@VqA(LwP^SLB5ee8Q>Sl=_^xguZ5J{}?K2tly3#~`;-2>uzTmd z#2AX_|JR?Qz|Ym=uOy|Pfp zBufX$r$Qf(xAp!yb61UiNO%Tt9xt!TraaHg$45V$>nQu zU0em_g;9|gc13-h7hGSR^BY%ieO`OCMnlfLYC5>dgKYiY{ttcJ?sL`+IiofT2Kl2( z%h~RA_mnEgc_+6!*KY(r>(iJ6JkH4VrJz1DczZTlw@Bkn!1~7y-h}%7b1TOiYDZ;! zs4i;9MAYMiJjXT#pOx*HhVvv(ese#u)fel=<-2u%O8Fj^8ZFN2fk*x!;#9BU%Ab|_ zPVF8Cegev9@ONJsdz+sZpt|Ys@v(ox>p;HWWSqV6OOC%_3w|WVXB+e;pv+UsdWiaq ze2{)#zsJCyRPd)JR67#poe<^tP#&6*hn|5VpEAKGy_5&a`cpm@`wix|-+mgT{!nH8 zF_%RAqB>ukNcGDH)o;i6#yJoNKJh3IlJHr!J4O|zio*HC?xMXI=aTb+%T!4(+u-fz zVd>I&ik}|qPVP63`C@$&`(EWOAx4%ICGq(=CSxvPNAzXk@4I(@&~g5=6!DeoF&p?J z%TM@?V!-y348_N(7$*|ICtUtMDUXFbj_)rxAVQ7&pmtQ+nE^d5=bb9Y;|l4dgZN52 z4Sx#1Vy5gE%P|#f(N0P`g&wUc74?`Q&$4!Wmi?u1Hy-Cn-rHX_s#zj0^P{pJ!&bb} z&p-UJ&>s?(3V!M%!Q<<|sNvH#2JtH({uz+}rq!`WWSeXc#owiff8-Sr2h{Js4&?gz zI`HFk!=xbf2gKC|eXDzK>ZYup@?TlMs8_3sfm{Mgz79;qXW0*mYdX$z+<3p6pTA3w z7x6pyaLO=QmifHj&3xlk5r^Xk7mZc!|5Dskb%j3GWdWb`(fnnrpA#=M;;R~j(Lv*M zBKX`7*B0G1S8XIz;Jp4#0q?ZE^KgyP2j`II{_yUEE)Tdrkp6VG=bG>%Vp-A0+`lRR zmGLoxmwWiYTS5A@|9$|+#|-||>n%Rwu}xSf`in9?gwg!wfL(UTbGs(uGslzo)UL@m zFXRKqBlj)zi}6Vpg5+aBf5?QsM|*R3QRXAHt5MOeQR&(JK^~6^l0n{saGo0sSTs{7v)g4JSM0!?%7=*hx6WHx_bklz!R2gdfWIM&dllQ{M1% z1NLDeuH|n3yI5->)HiO1rC|PWqKt)n!K98$c^^Tr!N>g0{5bFnJ+&PVH8E3^-nfND zgU{n!68Mdq9{wZD7|7@OI}JR34rt@;_OpZSFT`Pe!uNUf*F{{~{d20$f7@Tr;B^i7 ze^>6`iT2m!cvAkD(Js8+uz^pO)3^|W`%&?@|57VH-{127dNTODj;rzKxbkZ3lT!Pn z0q4B?II%@Xjf7_c=W*rx@G&hyfKy&7;}v;B_`hst>HhktfcS z&z2$myguT1*}z|Zt>jnAcu^j6yyQ4i9w)$$1jut9r{c5B_l^HJk2q^mMvDB6!T0G? z&fn_ly(;h>kt%hF@uu**V(BT1IR2D>8Mu$e`DX@ivBR1t*!?&5*Oeveiv@pkuAjSw zc;h46>C=z>O#Z%QJot?pzWrGnB%iE`d`bqN9P#?0WNuk!o) zG#+t(%c)1J%0R!1$`JA5@hBFbWj>8ZcATeJ`qqmW_nF82pKz+zT}0$F<8G+y=l-J4Y__39BV@D%oHW@6Tq{9$L|$7)bj6h zVS)Tm<$hEGVPY%=gCm%Epaeq`x0IkPT(Ql&u74h+pfA}o(ed8a_lNyRc z`V^73{Qb=JmzvjR885C)ekbSncXH6MAK3(wcR`;UW&cOxFY|Rd;ru+c2Y7msBIDRb zpMJ&lc-M}Jvt<3I`@%1_Z^Z}O%S-m@EWo+`PE-1yk?W6N1pmPM$I|7vRKL!N^D+1x z)?QyUd&}3&WWS++kavMsxzlDFmUF)N8MuCw&+@Bw^PU*ZFKHM@*=7%T9Dn{E3CAbt z$#u1CpXq_{-wnBMYhT)vtzV-{oSL)!LQ@K~;=0IwJIf>fW%@Q;EXT(Ic_(=5UN&tZ z*YCo4<1|rE&pR&+e7}kGv;A)Hz8(10WI2BP`+$k3#rUi08hJ>rKmM%9FM~(;Ik`yV z#d7^AsF&OSyDBHI$o^R%$L&8g>;4p3zX`YXj!)5!OIPW?m>>F6_>P?_9mXf6MwkkmLB3{cij{SwH8O;i2$byPT)zRN{7F31q=Y;^I3aIE zeA}F<@~<3!7jTZRKBU=NxqsV%yHVzIq`sB?GvK@j<<&f$H^}*8cq;tk{2E(+$1igJ zxDXc;c>P+hkbmD+X8>*iekpVLJM>-{I(+>D|1{--UGq={&ma$JXwwUxbX26?}3PXCgODT zih+MZn(1CYLR3-pa;{Tiz$X&LA@RBJFAaKAwwp_Y7=;SLd0#&Pa&X2r0~a-Dg3KhVbG2+qYoDLj}rE?e0bb| z&omNlhaCTIx4O%%7jnB>fICqhzC9sSpDnL7RLGfEGiP_^M;LweyCKK*KmYVbF?F`Q z&IR0qvgxPRF1aM!kR|-$edBy74R(YB_gx1)6ZNMdPA2e+o;@BB!5vj44&otNjUZI)SRDHT?oM8-T%y$34G@LKIwd(^2s<> z*r$IX{QhpzhPv{2oTk8EJ$`ap&POBU%qUwWl+W>dUrAU`T7kDb^r{?>*Iv6-Job@I zWM?9H=L(MhI+&d<;D)C|-VJ6aA*+_AW-Xr43=htsd7@ytmvd1%yL!XLYRN**~d_44V{goGNxR71H_j}vT z#Xe*bc<;C(Hp=?VokYK6{UI+d9hUWHDD;OvPWemLpUU_v;eVHqT$w!Xk$pDcQNZ6V zwPW!zufuJE?yVXysK<~(eB>wVR2j_ z7lV>;>X%mOGtHyCkHOE0@IG9p&!+U(c=u)HgZLiIAG{ChguV-1zn?+-gq-6fM||G* zVErlJ+wXU_XoKiiKHuR1zs<-~Gju`pEB8r^Z$!LS?EPCC$_)x9Xxz#`zv26Q7VwGU zjk`9gsc5%M>|2gnW&VTrEva1+!RLLzX`?!~Qpbo2XnbXVGq7LJ@%*D?rHdNyV2-b! zrm#MgYk$?`4*`$rGrSf4@V@1hx?!cY+4cFK3*ztTvR%9H9N4W6+_&@dd4Dfvyy&NA z!q;gv4z|qikDu>eD&i9Ph2Rg4*gjg5n3GTTI&nY6yj<{eU$F00y8`vuRtP)|`j!-1 z+DMZUsE_vtRI2w%PPC|09sh37DFi&qFMck{JwVu%{G}*6zI6Pe@dVL_ILECL^}qY7 zwpE=Wcyjy2H4@L0ar=eF?Y*M`kF}D&4%n55a!8fSM?%0O+>P`0m7>1=X~SM3@#?<<$;%NsDz{HDl`{<+>8bYlk`sdiXi|aXoiN?CM$kB;%>T`8oQY6%4J*7VF}> zz2KGCWB})N(fs45>sD)dX#?bS_HiN~*w2fDzAmVNpA?6v5a9>+quTS1%nFh4%()`p z%#TH!9NQ{9Rws&hkh~4@tbdDYX-|!W#{=hna&G<4g+nAfNm2jf3WG0dfy?<7pDF4$ zKNaP+uq{i~9$^RhN(b4)_GUoutOs59Xuu;pQY-vrdwcveFDeAMT%Y}!s3+bg`p2r# zFT1PVf%Qd0Uo6VDLh3TrH9~ATMcZ-!@Fgw_u!L7dJ*%s9_+>ec_t4cZ{~Ii8C+86Jvq z<;2T(H0gnHvO=E&Wyo)P7wV+?TsY5hviGo;3=L8rw?ALkC!RRiL7fszVg`6|BigPC0grHwTVyT~pO(6hzSc^3G|qFsFL};zKo`V*&PO}Oc-;b8VNV!JjdbWhUq_sNI2`~{Or5ow;FPOS|RU1xn$Kri&m0P z#Ci7XkgZ%E9dPoiE&OVH_=HJi4fHD=@(W{j)=*10`;`fNO0m^*H4+{fk+WZv+7VGI zM8esxMC8w&c5V8q&Dr%wLq3+vO$$3}CHXjF4El?){<-QXl6B*SC7)xzU^la(zbV zGoze+Yo}Ew)n~_f_PfZ%JA*=jliwYntYy`V^(tq!-!`mkoRD{+oPYaBgD{8Su^kjA zE9Tn-_?-&=ME%ybdekTLV{tu@f_%sXzuc`CyK#;m{8rTX3@9@mMP;9siL`=4U=KzeIw>DVueDj?!%L0A|`1$|PTzxk_kgv?I$b!OO zYu&d~D#r!#mH8C|zUlhObyaMEd}V&cfq!+IV{FyfoP5eJ6YNd`@B1@X-PORO_EhdO zr-65@XR%t=Y3|m=g|FF2lgM6A6Y_k0kJkH1j|Luxa^mo1R{mZA>5nTU<};2* z^}$tr`=Uz!c>lUYx$viIGoix&#AU+1H0a--vMOFsQpCZ$zTls1r(g?x$IlQW9?Vl9`W}+$X~XX z*S3h3{YzYd?}_01fXjMy?I7oyO`$(RSM(#f{uto#DD8KDs42(CxH6~y=YMtlL6%Q~ zTq??sy6?IWCdEG<_GbVOse8DEUcwX5e){4f4pE7rU*!Vs9drKkdw~0J7WneOKMuw~ z&)NR(eDhB3Z7+yLdU*WglJ8NE>NT_~T1s2|F)-xoU<^($D$C_MO;xw1;e8vZDSE9r@bI_9XyMLwTzE zvFf3c{!E>_j6z;@eeMBye6j&&f8Mz;dVPqb zKOQ)@cd_>u=GIDh6yqqzk2&~xE(uS?dG3$Xx4f+r4m?`r{dpVY1NXN`v|k3~p1xnq z9bpMvhjN^G{?nHcamu=wwlKF@mE)jxQRa~u`~%H)w8~@3L03`SqhOaEyl*zRTkv~} zNuP4vl?YyDuGaDSj5+lYU%Bo|0Y9Xn^=E@2kRPd7cX_~HZ%Q=qyEa&g*4fH+7h$v> zOT#+IXcY0Wpd_50gRx1U$#332<=@5m>DH4?+4&TrN>r@x5+r#qFN>cI;*u{3TEy9V z4eQ&lFV)M3w?6;xD5XKqva7LEXWbjX-#63h%L=>Mh6Rh3zc0z_qJSGpit%Pqn+IDo zh$s0I1Dt<{$Qt*%Dg-#Si}H7OY~VMTGjj#cfm|QOS?NDvbUl*{`{NmY7hU7p8KXkW~q`#jB~<#{hA zT*Su$Uf;e=Zu9s_af*)>>ux*nw=Z7WLhV$$c;3Q*^R~T$=fvm3iGY!m>GwF4`jz&W z!Jk~KMb8LhAYW;Z9sImA?o6WJ$5iT9+LH*rd03~Z^t_tPr+%5D=tpkwDTdzm(7MZu zaXn*rw9Xc2Aotqm~t5W*mt7BO{5ja2ha;0L7vs2UaJ`26^Q>Osu=U#T#>NI)7 z%OytEpAMYAXZz+w?)VCMuODXpaSH#U@@%TL=UfHfqmQKDSW(1>{c{v-Fs#agsC6uF z2G0KVO#EeUt)UN@I_6*Ldrc(yr>d0GzXpGI$hR}Z z;oBzi`461^%X7wPe1GUD-_O94e`et9-w!7*|2Vo-zhYzy$y=l=Kfc4YYwhfmzs|5Z^UK1P&V4=ygMljPHSh;iBs{N<-#j|ol8 zmbck&SxTNAq?H;%39VWdv{C_(ivKL67iOTt}oMADM3k|L{*^lEWR$ z6ea0bDfo8qpMAcz2#<3t<;@qJ5&bz4yn37Z56EZF)~B35-Qek?L(3bitSOtXoUc6K z=bE-;Uw%u@`Go9M&R53DB5s~Xt9uqO2lAEkl?D8Lv$qZ}XbR*j?Qwv=y7to5g^YoG zr9Ce2Zx*c8sIVcBue2u}{MR2oUS7l-7PSbC?=P*xl=CM6G_R^KuNbNb|IH`~r}b{E z^qJNj%KdM?@6__I8#CoPS${@x(JvW`m-PAeyA?Re`PS!UbIQ?qdOt=oU4os|r8q9F2P!Nn&2)akoUHg+0m~8p7kcE(!g`g7wumO)mT;Umx>2 zFb;a7r+1yq>k5ijEY7UpR z#QV82z<-+eMcr_7AU{f>KeC#LM^se7DfD}5O8rWEV!*dtoI5nyER_65vM&?t#rYqKgY2Z@~z3r(r;JpI84xDqe-zS98LE}zTb>T0! zL-Nq4`{i|B3~*itR@A=RPG0BPfb%@HXz-*X@;WabIL||g+F=KI{G@$Z{+)hQz*_5GN&oMg!~kdi9)14q z52KoWNL`WokJ<*D{hRQ{(QEnC(OVgh2hRRo>9kFEX5_&)z%@z0OVA1Lk-m2JKf1j2 z!{~pneqD4=F-{t>o>|`GQA>Fp#Ot&S=s9@)*Y5HmbsfsnGxV zs;=+J`ePu^{VR3+g~jqZ%LbhLSDyNtiv*p56Rs{TvEZWw_3OcB{h8nwx}2Pg#~GHQctml3 ztR>?1@vfr-4fbq(%K0l6y!PGB^~`T&P1$_qd=Ur!K9wV*fFj=N_%YJH(c8F z7L8GA5gOlLTGuG&F9K*@(_>sufP5-S!f73rE`6qc$a*vKh;>rA0(VMWyVdom(3gFm zo`3giQNdtx%o}O=y)8=}5yw6KeqX9J zGEs?)Su!E(DZ^C=YlH-IwF7VI%(*GfSACLVd8Q;1U@Au*FUu+d5^L|{0LS05mQ(A-7~MDL=Zpx@2g`!;=sS(?LqZm-z$vF zn{%C;1U}o#zh}kkLH_-xmo3{y^S&){=?LauCiIOgKJb(O#lNU}!oO}YH;4T%{>6e{ zzoxxhF#jC+gnztVj|ZRZrFKfjXSsdpd>ZUdllb(WbOX+tP_i7CT#t?_@E#sXUYzmu zr!alA@RQC_J{cAHl=P3dk0x;MymT+;eQWK}(*;6&s}7R)?*Bm_&l_2v{FJ1X@I>G| zZ=`OnSwkn`DZqJM*zwo8)==QouAB$9yTXoi@Vj=1$j!gk#r_dLI;86 zH@(w0*za~lWeC0eo=y|^ect|J;`epR`g#0F&l38r;II8Fc5Ut`W{Q&R;r`93XZP$6NpV>QmwcKLPa|+A+1chLlMM`J=3t zVBdQ=AeVxY{qf*4+d+KtN8d0z&%N#7f4_eU-p^)fAfBrYeH@t;WIPGD-j9L4*2O-3 zL3PXZQM{5B?_GZf?|egNCe@%p02!rDRO1v^ur=lGxvD}&e>@ZL`k_}Al3+PE%? z2_3$1M`0(Or}!p8&iKBF8_QboS@xIWYr}aVpFOXpt`YMke-HS{`$K+KzHgJp4esww z><|3gAmpvqOxk?odBA=^8tSWZ^wUxN+>T%izHxU=<56~ZHQ%leqMyf!B-ot{euY_=`{h#f zd&;*o#kidTK6yy(Y*PH*5S^#-$fno_vEluyo3e_kwI*U^AH-M2)$)Oe)8Pwm%IS>R zT>6jr%D6hfZ&^R2MzHtxDC6V;-_WVexFB)zkEa}`bnw3#+VLjENj@k}9^4=EU1)hh zL*wjmf#PJwXF0!VzKw+5Xq1d|$^C;%tE880@b;6iIO#m)o$~iP-1uFRcg{uE53=qE z7>C@@mp6Q}C)8UJ+e3Adzflcxj>{@@w!iXw{e3rxyfQov<=&iGAlNv>&j(we=S=h~ z`~NZy#ev^;>En7FBeIbWihF>a-t#mLnIM;hl4aBIS@xI4ArH=zUWzaGQ=V^l9Ezy$ zI`O}aLov8t-KNMpT6r8&?q^$@hhnA*904flyTKJ6Mp~j`ouf`Z5-k_MT38( zb;rCx;^ZHPI8HY3dpSq_7Hk}HDaN4$@HtMY_$=o)jYEm>GX*8%Typ>5GDFf!y6K>C zNYy-h9Po`p`2G^V|J{T4Crs|Q_D_wOq_Pj<^Y=><-WTh@Sm@hW`R{olf%8Tfzb~HG zS@Gb%EMOTQ$Fd&z_*IGY9gO{lE%-y$-GW8@&DCKiSXyzzKc}`@IkI8w2@D`%}RG zICIdQ0){}o@_Nw&zU^4)$MnpIY!9suY>M@PF($hoc=JbVLqFmBNSk*&{>`h#cTj%W z!RPlI#dOHiRGpZOJAqr!PSJO^7Y>(j7uSdPBek3oUNb_%-N5;MOC{^qdY)UtJ;3=s z)uSTU3g?k2%a@JNHa5^e&{_o=p7Z(YbI;TGV0eNw$lzv%`Ew*%*W_LkjO zUe7P#PT;&Ba-(wJd<7)j1)SGiiy{};3TET#NWA};pI3TRd*s>E)tB2;-h;*u59Iki zPVdTlJ@-o#zRtLz4gAOVjk+{yP{hzY;W%)O2{?~W+9HQD_nq(CoaHURd3>r;y4=H? zeLq;jxE(l;PyY-a^KrzFA+=b)6L=Lm;XUR(|M25^R~M|H|H=N0VL9)^g?*p9@BRf} zU18h}dG_yeGtIZNwl7a%+yk8N&`P)mIOp$|XGb*BW#el8UOVScY{#|6 zo_*hIN)}N3O&^N*aC}{je!o?{_JDJYTYz(X^Zl^l{nU0{9s}3dfpdIY?)^CFM%eED zEbj!)@oh4}Hh2HeMZRF%1)Sqs|9tsI<-aRGk@dTQ*Ps*L<3!eH>F2H$=lt-$_rrnr zti;SP9o3}xsN|nN{)TqK&w>tz|NUo#n{b}vKX7NtMy(`o0nYMu7oR(%lW;q5fBfHk zdNec}SMz%aIQ|o=g{C@3O`D?f9u$8UdD4A+uI~C?gq~B@7+4Cb_M66J-{^{ z;2i(2UPXQRm#s!KmN&E)eslZ_xz*m>2r;Q8$J^L^ZO~<*IE5th=iMf^ZYXU(eut)3Fq~b z1-xD#HtegDaIQZd?~nMpZR2yYekbJkeSR4~l&mQ0cLC@5YsaN4t7QFLzZ<-D*4P=L zLF(u4k&l`+?@$i^Ey91EpS5!n56JeJfb;z5-kZO!Y@Y}9TEP49?5){hQvG(|cHl>v zjy|B5a5vh;34H%hb=O=H?!tMVUkg9zzA{|GIX^6@XW{+4x#akGAkX#p%0IuAT)%38 zSch_cbW0iXl^h>ahn)Gbi>JmF+hH=lq+L z0&d;4A zBCpH#dw}!$>1vB5ea5r{wS zTiB7`dc4QM4qm?8{SV~EIHtlud=KU`C&q0j_&w@=csx%EGet>!C+2qp&y(OE_|aM; zuPc!6!g`3W_dMWtur5Er>spqg@!O5{qp`DyPm7Ty2NX)ou0P=V54^>p`QH?FvZic4 zUqAV;|G>{0^tMY8N6zaH@{g~d{MUcrw`x*oVo`e_Kj8Wg{D=c>`$t*>`O51jRTtss zhUx8^7PAEM*?#}^ANbGrru|ji9LQ(;c^||I{`%qzF8m*5Zyw;{_5F`$_RQE~DPs?c zpfnU66hRStP&M|bEtV4dP)qD%kG0d~2_GlbxUK z_z(QWwbzy^p$g`U^Kr`KKR?AkuSTd$IIhxuD&u9sR^a~gN8uLsx8S=J$B}eh1bkH) z@gMyB?}ds@gZ!3F?{}g7A|L7fvgB`xXB+jNx9gtE04gP>wL|&%meMk?i#I%j;mNh(?I;+-+q`Ga9YHv>e=id$~=(!yUl$iXHyn7W?yFXDnm#iT{i7-~vwfIe50p`757e$O-aO zaK%r=!vMY)TZ`UTGD^Y$T$3o{;2JIU6kbrLhd3W5exm=C{U-K{^X@5#qaO0wPvrR) z6aMD5i1Y3i>=*JPA2fAjd&K*{t{0Q7RKKrBCT_-sLSVV}s$OzRgUM<%qBa_M-F)8V+d z00ulN3G%c~INmm&HB2kefP6T$Px^~YiJIZ8Gv^%eur$cianRS!N0B{SULyO#(t*=) zP-R_YlxxJ$tmBkS;1r*EKm6dBZEu-_^v8FR{!@G|IOiVe*Qjh3o&cQ2ZQl1DHr`&S z&}6bd5qMd#!~biwFZZv9@zq5N3)%cxr6TETkz^T#tP1@@*uuJ5J! z?g*{q2;7bRG%g|v_un7+77w=!mgh^!-*e42c1xaI@3GL}mk(2S4fc0v`R&@T=PjB> zxDGh^JJTHfpmXKzk@{CV;dv-p1i9}?XDsX_-AkNRl?;bF;& z_KVkPa%q0fa;G65ma1rf{FO*ukr#V5kbXDt#$t#6_bg)dv$pT`SuOrA{7YFT^O26L zpUynFXx=-~SB_<#LlTdA*BeDF&A zU*I}xaC}EyHoV@tc;zkNVLnCsZP%^1y}&keJmKo@!Q=g}hRX(2j_zR3(hodvBEY}% zbfZb9eAROPCUB9@M&P>TGS2j!hO-y$&j>dO*4v-pyI~Kln=Fw3_W1H;5r(&1@jt=$ zp?{6&#}x24)v9|V)O`mQ@V#G4d)(mH{wC(zC~dHQfBd3+7(bcdm90AN5?yZ<@lC+^ z>j2TUCHws5J^fkWG)KVy9x{G3o@pLF(cx+DP~%w#z6IMqT<-K3*d_EOqCJ{FQoyU) z^5pVR*AtcNxHRy4a=j zaQnnOX~R58*OxuaUVpzvs&F3+eP_PV<*@7g`xDxp=vO=^G-hp2AANs9>3l%mBWWumjk2>u9?*Tadc@HIeqxzt^XdE2k}byx z-FHjzcY!~#-<|8xI%2-nPxm`e{4>Be6v?wXCUDmJt&FgT?lYqJYd@3mac=T-Rx9E! z@{Hoo`$goL3hkI6ADFoPP1*1_=Zic`!G2+l=vOcLm3S$4I`oj`>Nx!L{f7MO*N%^`l zD+o^nPW8NP{DSk|h&L^OhbI9qE_V2T=HVM>XbL>oFa9s$oC2Ker|X z1OKmPX;bOmE%HIMPv1%Nf%ltXV2VF|13!UNe#G~Yaj>e!&!jl`@vQ!<51B3pn(vz0 z)V*2!DdL$(a;O{sul^%@k{~xTeyjiCVEGgFBw&9kww98|Y&_mc@WTy!^S)0P6yki&F*}1&Buk@4V?eGdaO7Z@p@4^x8`n&i%ZXflx5qd1!9#5mV3;QWQN&cUm z_p{z&EN~0tlCg~(HfPff}IMust+9eBm%qn#rc(?_4 zU9rReJ3VV#m(y#1?j-*2*B`0;?wvW`xWM@o;Qse#%JylVG|zq9Bup<*>AxE|)sv_* zLw};@am08`22SJ9hre5Hto1z|M@emR{JIt2`BV3o?MIa!W}tb3^Of~80sQ+p?kgYf z5dKD~(Y^(|N3Lp3S-xb&s|^}iTCe$*8eeujDE<`vk&N#HtCz@i)|QknE?xd{U*J7^ zBA)5c8wUAx-?R!G>xe%C^&U9Qf0_7u%s+9T{4f5+50LSw^0L?f8fR!K;9m;#8NvIs zPUJD3?{4H{67cEgSNEf1eX(v(&hJ9EnD^5$@1#I34O@Zx*9qYs_P2;LU1z2HGv|Bn zo{Yrth?r-T_YtZFO1~_(f9@P*5L(~<1Yda{p%(n7Essx%Mm~~+;4AMVG=Xn>`MM;n z_c@>Lx3rNR&t?CvJyEW{T1!m175ZuYM(4YnkkkF^tre@u&ZqSo-FN5(|K-`1W5oyk zC|`u6h_~t^**>kGHG^b)Bpx0~_ixhrdFg3scc2A{_5@!PE?h9yY5ME}@;)4FB$ z{;00u40iyhasAnxN`FQG_xm5MjF$`i$LWUEYMpF{{uO*>yu9E?G#K$9_CMCU6fe!^ z(*NmwM}Mu1m&jX+7muS@?;6mK0rIrowc>Bi7wg?*>=(BCu@_XUX-l=;{~qGrBYX83 zR-T;nZ$*6|eQxM69c|gF^^H3&K@<9D%+i+T($D(z9Wtzs)W-G150-u(Uh~@1x7_k| zq=)2aOKXCjeMe*&#r2q>r|90-A6>Xz>#EQr^4J+A=O21rm##k!=)81AltZxI{sdp8 z;HN_G^H+;2MBCqT#s37~8Y%VD^S$Zd4;X#Ec#JJO-{X*ZuO5PY$Ngqg-RbYEL-5VO zjd<@x0_57PQV*l|AW$p9o@BId$NJC${^Il&Z{p0s<52Jo3VsUsxz|+c8{)l%F`4Lh zx-Q@b|BGj5`{gub*YAQIWKSme<1V+@A)ex=d=fqgdt3u$e2A~J$~Zl^Q)o_ZZFYVF z_+(Ea_=^fZy`0BirJ; zJxs=7NaKVL)xiDz9jzP>I`9sDHluuOvh;)g6@2A*FoOSSgLjI=B@t6@1z$NHlE7cv zFk?*)OSb%oR*r{M@HaLyU(K1Aov$1Z>EJJ0F!zsK#_W9Mcu)_QaXG*0?#|o^A^3{% zkO2Nb^X{ZPy6k-Ac(8yU|K-v)n)vK|<#D#^W`g|0%e5~@8M5_zw)gN@!T)Dy z&N-phQ_APV9N>TQTcOzhT2FbvvtT_{A-&Gm|FxdVx*k1J`fs^Z_P~Fwr|5YyJ@|ch zEgqpem0Yo}zf^!5=oOSImE{rzl=#@CS{V;!ws*U0842K*EB)#>wSky&E9Orfu4B;k3=8;8+MK!;tIy6)z;z6|o{<86 zpMT?~s(Rhn|!7w3qWhCiJUTe_lM)xTWXhlmC!< zbxATlwF|oQ#)Pn+o|AV&ZzA}QcW*nJBZU2QoI=mNCxaht>gvgvy*_5Uex3&YA4&5j z=2Fy0F%Hd&ap(hI#3ZnekCt)cc_ivz)_3~mNPOk^XMa*W#XLrNL-#YK;r$2YPFJcD zWfR)p{sf=$MoZ7XjFEBd-7&IpwDm1l{7>*HZ@hRvy94~kDevcqF=yvf-k8AiVC!A+ zb8&U{JkEMw0_A~fthA?4`Ca2<4cYZ8^FR;&vad_6h|8V_(aJn9gWvw0lY>I!LDuyK z$^$$2WpkhJD)NB;M0}Lj!Cc@s9O`T%@__$D9+=S2bUc*-zTolxp?D`_{+PO?)7S{J zV7>hX`Ul_Rw*D#e!|;WSpJm`DM`@lU3Bgy6J1h7LreB*CV%%lDpMu7n1N_-@!Zw8% zciH0Y0e{QNZ+HDK@m7tK_U|t;{L%jsZ$0?lE(dj?;_X$-xI`fcX7I(IA|7sh$31DJ zJYJ*swhSw@^j8{Z{}n$c^mRV;{LudrKQH)&cT~;%U*e}3FXIvQa&_+iC4L6*)4iW> z`(NT`1>gQ`NP4LF`HIW<(R}9sU&KVzEf4GkxND zbd}QBR|L2O05l=%CvyUYr^d@J5w=N0*+#&LIg7kU4S7w?JLTkZXF)RxdCew?3CM(XjRy|cLr zuJm7(4*K!=UNcGhQM=!eG^$+!Pd+WGNA^E>ye;d!JOZcdsAll)UbF6@ei3-`O4$!I zZj&!2|Tfkw2%BZUHZk}=v&;2b`9`9dFEg9dH?9% z4VIs`_bmo~e-G=3f6Tfr}TvyuNhwAuM|osII* z0sg2mJIB!VBa#ySQT}=7O6;dm3$}j4lWMhdr5g-U$J0p1fPG2{=DIdRvX)+#^ z|ASQXQi8@WaLV5>{rbE-e;o?_>l<{r#PvHA`g^_?QJ(8}0jKkdJFSnCF)b{y4$gU!_@-P{+ZPUs~`z z;5TWTnl}d}f(%Dseo*F@YKDx@f;raj>G~z;sz7|8R}WtCO`j&wz4`*TA+OEA&-Z`) zQ{d)(zY>9Kf!lx&eQ~E(el#F(I^J}bm*aG1{K>Mse$w-VF31-ybMP9?V?y4G{pmU> zzq3I5VZ45+lBItsz_+B;ddlmUCZFs#EqFusym^n$4{1h;8-TYko!T46?APKtHQ`57 z`yJ)D4RY4DQcuFgD;wB#@F)jxx^6!t&)*ZNAB2A%$Z5g5(kJFLx6h0H_Gxk)FS=^} zowu)=Dg7ru7k<^fK5t(;My_{A|Kg8F4GYrWTH+M{pW>5`v-pSE=)8?qw*TJYfuk4R zDs)4H$Zvn74eitW5`L^QXcEE~$PWi_>i;}1`aR_RZwBtdw%e!6_w)J7i~ZF9Enb{E z7u5f=g8RR0>#J0;l>ob!^dYeEu>cJ_hhK*QZ~P!?+UTU-we_P4P2>H)3#H z8pWCWYk<8r@C==%eaZV<3)~6(>*lRm^ZR66=x-13u-p%x@cU#kus`J!nQtAI7kfhU zhVa)6dChDYmmH~YmQk4yxC7%!4}ATbUR4Uf0fEzc%8YT{>)q}0p$XaFQC7&Aq34IQ zuXgczK;QkO`E5drhG)Z=ewxo{zASj=M@tk86zvmE_0D!_PUe3G;_CrE^K!N2;{EyJC*(cAGk{mD{mETgXNY`N)_=`h8HXt= zCcH~|BDG0SczoR(REMa) z1YenNUhtQvRBj)t9@&6v=1c!yo=(v4dSn1@0AA_-_Ex+eseqe-$DKNKmDi)hPIBE( z{@=83sKe(cy6@2ed2PL%yU5N!KEEr+Gs)YBZPf7irwo_%*9&=#tKKI({wllli|&j3 zV1PM+&u=bj7rZx%Vpnqi6FUdnKj|BdmCG9-XU2BNmUj#C_^1oXdP4T?{G;k|Zl4Wu z4s1KmS#q4m&j$Nkz?<}3zMRIXh!5qz7X9$aofikWe$@i$zX5t8@~2x?PMXV-?wd zD)0>0_9(FRwzA#}eX09pKAOSnf9Jc(IhZ}P-Zegx*Oip(T`%TUC*(Wmmic(Sq~m## zuTiE$9A7VaAeVvd;q~|a z9>?i?4e75ptV27l-wOS9Z0l9`zrO+nERfIG@5Hv~(RWk0{~GM~V7nozM?;=38Q4$x zkp5!hYMu{tJVEDE9+dhv=zNHNG5p7OuA?u0WT5Nx0s9Dt|J|ZL^xtGD9T2!3-|Mx4 zXWMz<7Uh$`4Olmje^p1@TXXxJq#x}^eb#Rz9Ulht1NUItH0Jawx(+39?+CeGr}o2s z{Iv;hU$aE|NAlIiFWMUkCPe?53s zY$s{QlnZr!CIf!h!RxRm^CLR%BHE*TrT)56>c}FVFJ8z|zMianYctOm)l%s%#oO}T zf(d*)P=9E_QBrTn#{S%`-8rNZ3fSM`EG9>PaF1AJn~r&{77-|`xj{% zCHsqxkG}l8b>Nv*5mDj43-aXuhWI5bgZwA^kdG5S8?rCR|1X36fAZ~;8r**^aPsfr zk{Unrd~ra(0lbaZnr`O(W5#}3Zx?FReT=xDF3W!Oj}5$BFO%lwW;lI^oBTWKt{Jp` zbdi1VZ&j#bq?HSfB>g?-Usa7v`}mlk$BPV*M1YTt8_cXD-~T1+7b@ zcd~!Hu+IeEk8$g(^ZAeLqx_sOv|}H>e$bQ+Uf(=Cy(*}GT+mD7t$S2*(D_%#bF44G zOKCOeJFY)r9_FvFr2iBC-PwWGUxD$8`ON`&EqIxQH_L~?$yxta=dH!( zV=MO4`MRkKYyXqmAe9Jt`p!1>cZmW|Ej*u{3i&xDo2a6hyazbNvq#}(H+X%@08aT( z?$ET7RG&oqcHo+?WjuD*9oR7s)33*Vnm?NMnda31=kcQYY65>yl{3@wBCn;lGF}ek zhZVdwM&qn}EdTYWe-y7`Lz<*=e_fEH`Sz@Jcq8sF)jz^3RV-YVj}O%{=_g$unfh?% zb3XpF>K}L`s}@)vRR2gG^FqWwzb}ks@ye=y;C&xi^iCYZZ6psrl19B(E(gQYK9KoI z`B44CTX}dsxJVxDZ~kVfgU81Uoctfsq-Rwg9|v&Nav6sq3p53Dvi7yuPx(@C_okM) z7*6$v^!I69@G~A?C;E@_#hkF(9;;Oae*S!mv!u!Skk*aARN1wJ<_}(X zd1~cuUT-KKgkRo%U@^yOKdmo5zOg-?=c5ztQoU>2I5O*X(LA0W@DA;{_LA$T^>+sF zdQ-G%RPV(2*Q}I&sd~%fl0Dm>b)>q^$G08wdhk;Ym9i`2#ran7P2m5P(PbLNjmOsn zo(;TWk20hA@s<<&=|1a~O{UGvW6H{>D5{TykJww@8O`tv$WxrJ^jUw0?&k~mze@T~ z`9AKi>W|e--UE3(c$H_Kc%fmq3Hxciu;ti|sp31T;wSW5fzx>KR@&QHeBVp_5>%0D zJLVfN>VX0IW+%Dcw>9|En0675s4z4)!b(Ob^7}i{s;T@b(pmi7E=7u+IQoy;}PD_`S1{#Tf3z`2`*D z={5h(NzZNzc^A&F8G-Lbpc?7yn`DcMfugGm7 zp9(p;&eUh0sVh4VnDzYTq}d(g!~8nG+@d`bJ>^KIaKSGh=7T&vzqvfaI3uk4{3e8} z*GRwV`AtiMALEyQQg;LJa2@dLVu$~CN?$fvb2tfE{N1$!KrnhxgO|DWzL4c8WN}W1UOufob>Z4+t{^L;|=6 za#SB*Z}_%c1j8x+NY9uNC)K&)ldC5GG4jP)>_N!C*6-g$M?g> z)&4l>_#Sd}{$kdP?&tXV0XuLyKk@PD72oms-U-};vb963Vh4ld+oV@ zbbM|H&p7mS*P!(T>~_NcQj@B7=eS3qe_humF+4s_;2GHN-k84#kB=VvHQ!1<#{S)L zChuQ8_S5yqs9oiE)BGs%$ByGwicjp6VH0_LtdOVptQ>S`1&@y%IQh3|Ykddz\V z_tms$?w<*`2iw0ood1sIWnmxnuLihw-p@IB|61XHBF0&Zis#4i{&9|z$K(2SGCmE> z5l(KO2K!Ce4xGGkI**?f`ze0f<#$)``1xAO^)B_(_PG;Ua{ru=Cp&tq{%{}fKM!!~ z-wO5Sw&VU~0M}!Cu${RLx6jyGwr@uq1{JL9<^Ji{OTWqf56T=3de4CgIOTDxqcz{< z_G#Kk{gfYrlP2}&`C*4V{zT{^!Q`s?7UO58R6FEM4(MynPM!+p)cp zP-+YJ&x!qH-yhS99OC_FMP5_>-a0igjK?p7^uzvhvo;^)`K{RyZ2#xYW9xDMJk&mT z^$zDQ6e_-Ce-3j*9JgOj?c;ug^K-U(czmqTYsa>HqqTo?|D4!Q{(r3PwS~7&_d{6G z&f{+z*W~fdApL0Hz5DN=`x!JFrT=7S_jbKwdHbq~a{N>N9vO5fg6FRZ@|3^TBf6dE z@z(>lV%uXzp3_10lYPJ^RPTC~*RKq;PyWYhCuF^!Qq(smt#*Jo^jKkW^rAzYbNp`9qz~8I>d>^gT{A-v0bDc9{*vLLTh71cVRQz^i zJ)dobo-beT@p)_MDhh%hk4(XSzs|tV^q@f_{8!*nX}~EC|E4@U#PieyJRRGGl}_De z>&2)HjFU{@{c~;lnBRw>LH&#WPR1ej(xBV?z9bXo;RN9BVu%0Y_d#fYCjx({iEQ)^ z0wv-^V~)0zBfW+Umy1Eavph~I(9^HmvuLa9LQ@e75eFLQbi7xf*Y}6{bGKf|(R#3F z@0L&K{z@TF$6=(WW4n{D!?Z%X)KBX{!avEO`-6{XI-WLsFXME|{&O)tUOW^B%%>%j ze#yG6KhTf3f64~=fA_5H$n{gbCfrt_`f!e$6!W$2dDK>lrO@w%UK)>!dSnK@@0IGk zYO}QeK>2lF@jUV<^uMQj_YJRCTF4o&?H1E4==y*Q?VEv{3N`qX$H#{KG@pLBZ2l*_ z9yk^C{15l&bl$!L@-A#wommye>jlM++Miu7ES|?tt7!jJx4N&ne$@{$E?R6q|M~kC z+MssjZ);Gmsr^6eUE09yb3opO?afm!@A3Fke5ifZ%~20{d{tYd z-yW=MZ+tQ$>-@inj}|!DcjdtThFm|bSG8#0a=2Do9v?I0X}vnIg{v2jj}5p1^4ijk z`g8jn!0GP7V-JsMdJ^6rEO;{G~bK( zn1LIBAD!G}IG<-T(XI;P_vr6;gT|K`ayD$=Yg6PyJ`Z~#=K!7_9{D|=haIS|F5qW| zPHM*IVKZw=NM{pa~&oH(Cj2JXOiTHUXTM4=t2 zP0rUeAG^Ry+kfe|Xl4&xPb7b~Y}sFd`=i+*<3RUAO-SzgG@QxP^+Y{*E1pho9>H+q zOnE)S1bk=v`61#>pB3*6=()V-+w+mYMZ8^DFL{7#ew6XZtlz;H1v{j+;CSo7 zTV-n!kND+T)%aI*YC1%9rstYQ^wl`{K&3x zS@|Q{_hLWYf4OyW-5lhHz%#qa>l_rX^=r~!v3NykcS`>$-iL;cA4u^M@@bGafcL7? zj&@Oqr@-mFt{M29eVYbEGdvT|{ZRXdS8OQ3+jl71?|bFyY2LmKxC`4sA6JTxf&MW6 zIy*)sf3&5!;j{kz`t^~ABVrw$bv&X87I7!WmBE#sc0i`mZ9mpSlNfJR}28uhmq~0xB35W3(~(!#)ago9V?>c@>F+>;ElES-K}Q+TQU^> zRW4mUlHtjaBl|bDxnCg2f8hE@QcuHj8HafLZs2r0Gyj!(dQkhoec1kcq3(rP*1j71 z)w`vie=a>cJ&xfCKgn@M{(oE0TAp%A#Lx0X+C}!Co%vkH<8Ops3$|^#Shi433VE|D zSiidXj##cgRUv=Qy*?k8r~6#p;9Z`Ydpuvq_^_Yyv+4d4o%uS2`cJ(_`af}c#T35I z(qX^(fV8t^j~aFPIwl$Vjo__4SU-`kQ*>lM@Ux|hX>zgnQXQi2o<-EGbU4DU3j9QT zQXxlms9pWveu-o_)k!ya+g9a&8O89#XR?2Mz<*o5Af4WmCiJWKO24U2CVLmRjbZXM zeo22n>*8;@ejVhE*hXX=y`X0D7VM||tR3sT8q4rx;B7x&{^u1VdT~vp0OXD*c zexyP!^3T2FbNk~NCPS7LH!td<8@!~PYo_J#^Tbd1t=cF3rgpEaKBCgt0_GrCh$NXyt|N9|^ zkp;}ulH3Y?8Cd5y!BeN**1rRuz`ct0T1~w=yC858*DU|A4%9-Q>L(eOYa`ALC}awb ztB@l*Gq65O!n#2Vxh;Q`m=JFWmJ|Nb_mAj#(nRnZ?QZ+LuwME_{|deZ`dyQyJ$BN6 zYG9KhT4Ktr;2XiG=VM&pufI9qSW!)OehTg{qvvfhz^@#YcM)CxB`Fb4H?E^<_e*=8 zxi)rW*MYOHgH{NaQuaSm`!XWXNUp@=31iW>Q!|7e7Rt~(IRp_VZf9QG1o{x%^ zr<@kJ6YbLTktKGFE-qhbu4&S4xe=}Ylw(k2R_2#iNN z>0j!U2NCE1(Y_V96WgiH+AZbx7pLTxbuJCxl^%EX`Wdc219BQ{=f7Gvm;2`-{DAcT z$hRlv^ZPw%9;Eiqmz$ZNAFpcZIakDI;q;R}-o6!j$v^T7VtLAoIa1QAN1ru@S+F5Zp-f@ z&cL`%1wLrN>3nn_v8a1?stXw3ZtylXy3#+lmU>cd1>XujJtyb`e{99lm&E%x`A_hb zbu#`J8LugWcE3>21NmZtej|ACF?;&(`(ct-OZg<=`3jXEsYRorKTWeGo&x;FmD%@8 z0T=HZQN9;MK;nHNE}N7~gIqec0{6dPBs_!t9eBSA-Y-J$H@57NbyM*DerLU3gzh(? z?=iUMu4@%$5UjU95hv|zxjr=f3OnXXeOtrE{2gg{%N73-NxxqGQ1F#_zh4+@Lg-h%f6D;=ku{sHhI+rBP4Rvgp-#LvMhm;Fkf$2yz~8)G z@!ps;>=*K)U%d*wrlRtBB7ys5U(ni|wlo$84{4la?KyaO{~?0~HSqKILstEaKP>$p zooCHINu`>e5(LptbYG3Vh-|0h%bP*>#n5?Z!V`-Z`ICGS^2yLk&%y6Clt|?DEfqMO zhi=p?;x4bBbe+M9_K$w_G=}T5&(y4@5kvE!tA;A7Yg;M4YnXXhC~-{)uW7({;*PfeSs<545EkI&yIDKEsBO7&4@H zu)a*#USB3HudM0;`Z4fuLZs()t>d895LSQlsAZz z0lc0sH)g#@g2&qkz8SpR#bU$waX4Lvumg7`{ne6kK*Yl`NXCi!Yj}6vvQYiyf&Ab{ z?=|P~$iRN;uT4`r4d(Hn=bbf2WIT?2n>vxlgW9M5I5oNV`cUngAV0jYrY>*aiv867 z?@_Dbc>B~JcJS0atF`3q>#^U7ZR_sOCdMG2LiL9Syj@pREonUysy{Noo4x7JpzGUC z#7lcr#$)=Fm{1Qw46u{`hIK-x|Gep5)hOY{025&Hbd;3x0iu zuCI|DgH}`wI`86wymhqHU&?VZ==oYNa4oibK7HptZ(nsx`bF(OZSXvXw@=sC?1;my zt>2yG`DjqcFYVr1!{cKHPI>)a{KE(yABrF8?@*#a9?~DGKgrI#(0U3KONYgfo+vHr+aaGHOGVFG1XbEKiTWICq_Bm>3wV6zU}fbls)OK zc09MohW(@`YR|fKnnOhXIDk{V7*K!r0$wj%z{%gd!-jOD_z8J0aH>1@IeWvoziE*& zZ)jfYYb;-Y{1EY{=QRl@JO3|#wI^i!4A>T%(C0Au8%p2*t6o~6$Bymuxn(~l|3m5f zf8~b@dc4@0;-Ws_@uGYryC%N(B8QsISE`XRUR1wwAHU%VXSm5D{Z|i{yfSNQ{}Jl_ zB3AGW*0qoL`$ee!5q@KC+%S&YA?L()e~xN-dHvL5zX#iQhHH1w^Nu1PGO(ZG^y=;} zdFVMufm6Mqd9Qh;;Zv!;3S55@;{$poPv4lA$HxR*i+b@#l`aE#`&Qs&e{6|`!+85t zZ_Jo?ovn_2!t1{i@>aCJ=$}e!xqTksG>^3^mA?wNFMUdI|9xRiI?3Zl{jWJC{cKTh z(_!8|)iG+n^21}3dH-0y2-fdyHfJW+Z-QPcw!R|oU*-Ds*l)+SZp8`3xqnWQhySM* zwA{u0OPLznelE>>?YMm&$Y)?XEoO2t-aq6&wSV%LM`^r$6XYm=8a35?&;8S%mT@y- z+i7ZI0dAia`ze0W)&4%j+s|6Zqn*7!`0nudI3Z8%Up=0_ncL@~_96e^VgAXyeJ$>v zr16{DG;B5>zZsC%oRNOK7}xG8x6ck-4}59(&KEp?>HbXe@154a-r(^!LC%Wp&re4@ zq380%_|lMnz+KvwHFC20l0oAK_?#z4`sHG{9k>Vh``&6R>HR)JKgCyt@!4xu>k&M@ znzPbxvj5hz290@q^}wl4h5hbn zmvTK}1F!x)cQv{XhPS7|xOafJ(Ah4P-w&h0yygM^{`OX*3P6E~uO91x4B(&Ed^Cy9 zq5fBV`y}-rK4N%}zC8yG@5AiLim(2>jN^vFy&D{P9JxSnM10NIPx0+?rk-tFt(?ig zBW=LxJL${Xe*6>DALRf}>yKNW4dOUC@C)P%a2K`>6T8o$bHf6+(fSj3{(B{_6k_sP z;Hq?K|KRY+ztU^fg*??mT0hsgxH;&$r~z`co^1WX8g&1i893FewZF`KhjLcvr}Z5j zf9ySf^f0Y&0yyMpefK=BWo5ozaRI0G-GdJAWYYRB)cWZEbv#7tE!71Xj~8YFT$Fx0A)nl|QZ#R$)+ZXs|8mAzm)B1dbo8G6-!)^!R^a{9N8B$ zqQ*6DpXQSEpX&RMgU0XX_UVCBegB}>%^ci55A>VB+dIEN8n5q8#NP^h;LHBcslJPR zw_`um%P+cUUi??Rbb`O?+ZJDks+T6T=K*iu7srFNM7Z?5Fy3@x-~Ky#8n*Zw7Dqq$SCPS^aU~xZDQ3^VuPb==t5i_{VIzm*B3&)z^#ZEt2UcA88{rZ2N0bBd zbbhe&fXrWsD{vcd7q)v(j9S9$5nYd^^Ums~1+(6ZF632Lk?*kYsH*gNI!`2UEpS>d z_B@tnBCi*;pX?jIZ0_AKwjMJ>p6t_k;HVP@h_3^@ z-)|ba(75ICGEjTi?sYu=8@xLbH6tn4%e8N2H z1JSm)9;LkAAoh#v5Sh3xp@+N$TY-z~Q8xCs;H&D%e4y)5`ps{zM~VKho{>1+hqvHO zxrJdip)Ii9i1I)m^^5D~`YGYI0366Cx<54oyl>G*JM^#UKQ;I!@G?qCf7X0By-aKfz83G(_hD;;+|Bn(M8=s( zv)l^(D)7i2C-}vmPJEcdl%4NACH*447yKMEOX_nPg83reF2rARUB+e5Z%gxw@5PCq zzzx_>c^tMaf3DoXg?)5=&icLd+YJ6RZN2Gv{^RxkT)zxMj|k{*fK~hHvBF+bU1~q`D$-8V8x+RX8;ML8Ml;AaJrz4f%{F?cQbj!_symk6>r(LtXmazkIPQ z{EJMyDdR%#Ei2;Kx}Dpf1f0JAv7^SF4diRUKi~;-r2Plen{;9AMlVtD(NBBqY?IQbP&OW_L^MM!_O8e3w ze|P%kA^tQE`U$?$zD)4jUzl4?X`iU~O8bODVRstjbhl;P60sGysP|U(x8NHTe#SSJ za#Ejv{=FpEJ@kCz{WTqn@#h;|&`0+tT)HhO7RN?NR+I zQTFx5NQP^HQy#riCC!ThF5;Gm`>g1@cLwk$Z9TUz+914m`xAV+|1aeud7a!0{`0N} ztugwyT=74_*Wr6wrrPp8eLMIaw_dxV)@J8>FCt!3Wq!KAFS7NGmewsKCG;!rSI7YW z&9M3|T1OFI^t-aZ1SaaC198^=DdS0F(S*M#j|E@ULksqczePVedq}&fAJ&Xqvm#t8 zP>H94PyH}t@rhxqo<(}{%6dfKjjZrahjskBkv_;%o;2;f{QEG>Q=)yfPufj+a(e#b zg5eC;0Vn$^wmnoi0=PepG4#DxH`+0R|GGhbXJqzyE=ChB`-keE1^nsVw!Vte1#j`jDgFtMW&cq7-;Aka z2=nV9-1t{;{Ccz>nZUohN%5y~Jb!KFnqi4=<&z;#{nPgMlE=dto(i1$Uv(n9Km>4+ z$I5uR!S7VF;E70oKk@t%{cQp6!#47keHpv&C{o`sIG=i5IJ}hSQ?kOIn)ZCxxxI;Z zWIV{;Cp%+zaeI~hnFRjxo~M_GvNr*E3bwu#o69kKqukg}`I~&ErIX($Mc*%`_>x^U z8?5>~%pm)L{uS}@L7)1r^ke*~?YCn5aTGs+doyJ|keTMvn4xCQ&kzacFyU5jIQ zGH{A#!IryBIe-g$mGvbR{D=~}PUlP@&*WC{vyBJvyA}+O%cTn*4}!1E$4u}Wysp_L zcYJofvcBl<%eXYV|M`qO>R^80enrJRFDwmw9}VLu5%M%|B;#*BZpFOezCR#GhH(8de8cK73GhNN?<;X$+|xga$e}`+0MO#@|W|K^P}d0^wU({;t}_?aQj3Z zwMGT6+YR6go#K0SR{X6~@W}5dYMgETen;Dx9)EvjeMiv!Shh$07wO!&H=SP~6@sty zBOUsBS2oNLZ7cn7D*8+PQ2H%&iti4R{bV=gZ5zYF-C-KpvdF7Me0PxSOoW~V6JG8N zVQ04WhzYQ^5cC zlO7A``XEUOzVbNN4SubKWfzKTXWail-r~EYv_BJkp;P3o?h*1{!K1h;j}e5N$Xg@i z#NVPFb^YM+LC3!m_aB#5mT}gZYUvP)mt@O)N>cQjQ(?bhhHRhgH~n?=L$crBUbNCa z)!)+p7S9)Npz{UPp5QC((}I7b%I*`?-^3UFqO?z7VjOs3rwQ^lYz6M`hwv2kw}`X- zkjyJuKU_)Nb|+jb*s`D8;8PtQx3Jer^3yLLX;K^?^@;y(5?{}%pGv=JeYmYq#Wa3= zqytXt%O8GUvWFiZ8G)01pFZ2$BGmDb4|ZC>|Gw;x_x|hn$h}VXUo!ZwUiCcnU&lwp zPXm8f&e%2o%khy9{1>yXz!Q+IEkEngq?w0fT@sS05il64avA6m0 zks9sO@zIgnJ$Lcrqg2RK|Ln{EtT8{{a093Q?^^!n7=FA#>p`;52mX^SJ9dRS-be3F->&XTuzK9Rj-&zkoWE^&L4pqKC=<>s{I_R@Nk>`eiG z=8>YmhO##icpA2OVwT=y_D1=zpWYr-IJqFwF2@=D zE9z7#_(|aFGG(09hw}d#Wh18C3VxzOeUE0q^O(#4>ceBk%J; z2J!0>>A)$!Iv;LWhF_PU<0+~~nc#2lqxv({bqVG8iGL~M@lHKey0|XE=TQ+qW&Rq$ zZ+^`GX5|0jcq$3}IxAi4LtU4kdKBDlq{>Kj0P?gxOUK`wFXsCU>=!*G;%fORc%EtW zWX~u*&*)!CzbUR`SJv?Ic_uMma9!x%ZO>3%7p#z{Iu_HfV>v$0*n!hHU9?}lgU>Tg z;MDH}*5zInYMwEH=fSpa^+JvRYo4L?Mh5ua-**-NuX%>}+Sf83TNgb0+W#l6{%}6ec)+LleOl33ozF8?_(${1iJ^^8^La+|M*2hj zlegx>(Y$W!fm8n*T(J?nZqqm+`%K_Zt!yh7s%~e%UMqO^6(c@lbvx4AAvmA8obBMM##HP6s_H?ns`!SBw8 z>!nUn4~&?HwExPu45<^*Bhv5|H()=Vm+P_p>DW;7R0ixYgCDPY_Xt&L{0I(L(NkezXa>|g5PDx!=j<)DJ$&Os6Hq*!9VZKwG|)6=P3vB z!2o=AgQ|u3JY~jys#l*)KXii6Q#Rm~zdz*P@gUSZMfJ=9{@5EyN&huZQ9irCkBupE z?Z4(J;%9)rsDF>1|I0k34U=(cQg!jNQ1cYkGd}N#<5DNay$SL(PucJ{=ZkqN1^Y$j ziQ^|#w5$un^Q6o5lEB4rm#=s*PW!z$f04=b3BC#XG~v=8!8fR)Rp|=*sJ(@m4GB z6qv}14A^UdJjtfuZ|<+i3n#VXmlyt<$^`r8*zxu}jyR8%0lpC7$#`S}{UzcUeXlSfxEs-ZL>|FM)y%PqHiQr{Hi&q=00 zj_{qDCwJ)lf{;&B;JwzkuhRJuZeKchNhMXsL)n)JyzbimLEi;U$9s86-mXKI zADR#)zbIu*JwG8#=QEc9gi>Bp9uN;`4bCs`zgLj zz^iw-w1L}C@y(JiJT4cPr}(Bpeuu6@(043Sus!k_Uqa%q-HrUctaKke`O#o<{*SqT@v+ixH}p5# zQ?%_{|NO`2z!T6;qjT$yaQhO0Q~SCi1*&oT=sx-s#4&urh!H%$QWWxUGOn)U_N4)* zJesni(7Kd#qY;2c0cF(}bNi04-# z68!(EkYO4he<_Og3qO3-m)lSAOGF**wV{7X(D+fvyQ@}i&+W?u zPVw8g^s1iQ7oS7=Z=NORxl&v2%;NT?K|TSzvj0xC^7v8w$v^d?3sbm!667fUC&L;g zbN^C+Q~XO8p3{r#r})Pseyw}Bk8=OgAy4tI_VttH+`mlViI6|Me36se7oRh@|6gzW z?qhBr#Xl4A-@g9jFFgK<3i-P$KPbuVO9D>u-{CtP6#o?96#oI&o8{p4B>+#ucGKx| zvv_4l(#nD`Ue6C>sS6siO3+I>rT{+<ZuVt zd+~!&{5hE<;1=NDwJPv$&~q}FXJ|f|cJhUl$0rqXR4-f?x}M|P-+*YATo#qVN|9G$s-b>86demlPI zYpy>lepoMl;VD#}k7py~DSk)3xOs=hv&b(Ca9VFxOZ_ea|K}cWQlIv|Qk%C=@lS$$^twGgdHjtE`L;dGA94FEz$yMa$ISSZ+eh&u z{e^6EpL6}Gkf-^oe)p62xqi2z{m5gpDsufaUnRo+U*-%9I^I(kkp9zr^=#koLwWl; z;51)d3j1R+Z=as0pySO(IWErO$MY7*)A8!8L63sIyOr8b*6n2QhMxE?jvr4M+Dn}D ze{;>ckL!0U^jAE-vL-)YkP6&~?at1F`|;x`^*hpk7uuQeU}eyE#Ep>Cf!C(#@ZmhZ zKE&S$yqfL1raZqa*iZA{#aF%ro?pq3PX=$!hP~(b_|j4T0$)`)=@PHMls}Z;o^?Z_ zdH?w!NBOgOQ2l|t|I`J8^S{M@?+orA# zcC!F)pWfq7`SI;nh1|S ze^RlZ@@Gfv{%?8yxY56E@D5aYQJT-csZ@V~@4uz1%GXEgcm~;chLF>^Meui!-_=*@b!^Jq5tUgg>Jq+a$|l@2G5-|Y6)K-S!jI#d~{g*GePe$ z!1{^SCyRPM2zn2f4{|jB%ap?lDD5Vf5QG9 zg=*yI<5OKk`cL!c?P{-g^7eJW(;+`uz4RP!-v~Sv{V+bE>>s@Stoal2`>t0yR<1({K-Gl^Bh6%8PgS& z@uB)zU}5vKJU&L?!)FfyuXq3e>&;xNUq-q zInuv<#^`Ijep-Oj^_FJ7ci-^m4b5mj8NAqnpUvja^U-tQWM3+H(>7=yQ5^a4st&jt zTmAh>F+88#h({*yj=dd2cz;=d#}}9J_~?siTX;SvU_aI4@6tE4=J}+Cd?I+OxBM`T z&*wgj*CgQM*X0d5-c7-Ns>kJq<<7btQyfnuLp}|>AuH~_;PqSwJRSJwz1H30^*mFd zf7F~819&}mQ@t)B{cqmfUC@8qPT(in_u+Um0r;-#A3UOKM*>g8ezJdIxh;S5_c|m) zJ_)>gFY7$x?{&z;ab^ne(v2^E%HQjdrqEyZ$=RX&y$&gmPX}+*A9020{nO(5oAUg$ za7B`z=W{>C-@m=S)bH+ z{=y7>x8L>s65&r|I{!latot*d-wyr+-7n1}L+DpN=imarh4W&3R0#db=U6hppYe`k zMYLjIiTK!YUZ3s*)oS0y$KUUf>20O|nRvdhey3Th`28wY@ag`V1GiEO^ZTD1@RM-O zqrFqZ3?dqV_+{N!=7b)KckKmv2h)90k}a<@*ojAWem&`9x?f715*133Ak#e05d?D{iDm__2^Ix_X2ZoIq>OZM)*Ql>{Z zc#~Ug0-M@4?&sRT0zQw~c8q4eQrJ(eug0Jrmj+<~z{3+zq zY|;*Te?+(YZ|+2RBw65^(lQ?2e`USj`h3dHNQUbP$9<8`>U(xYF+6oruzq*bq#2Rk zxB9J+*R+y$-hH$2LKMU83jN*c9l99JaJ5B_AF{u~oC&uhGT!Rkzxw@I+tglS%B|qXqrXz>$^Ni|Uv_Mdb+Ml8{0!uW3%sPYG7jH=e_R!p zouBpmc0BI)&466PNxm{UT-o$zJ-=K2OKy8GU*xL?{yM>%I=Nc)JSmdrk6)I5+7&VmUhqC&S~Hg>Iar_I z)AQ*D=v9@K{++(FJ}hric0T!M{Zs1KgYRlN_;EgrOOg`$mHwH*-*0#smp_r1ax47P z!VWulsfl%t764D^Q_epw@V>0*f77usSfAi4=N~WlvpOH`TreTq{F7C`=zbkdIT??= zt#+6S>9Xrr&OZk5zg^HUGCn@Le&zgQ1;2OAf~5+pgY}Dfo8})r62*NpCe(Kay&`$Y@>xWpI^$@On4wh3UNWY(} zs^+8P9idzNgkQ?`#eU(J7k26)Pkx#4x6-d9>=*JPzx4fN|I_#2HoP$(2}Au8xD)j{ z4RWQoeRCq5;pP#+-?j97y{#k1Ga*Oc!~+9Csvx|I_>TALcY?=O^Ge#f1BE)4>0^(NB+anX>cAetK_@5Bzf<4gDmyAv>S! zH^Q#?Dl#trl%f|_g|8fh>voe zkqW+bbonjfJO{6@VxGuQ%oFM03!P#-Y3|7WiATThPiv#)`Jj6ro;N!^%oW^tR&Cv~c{4Bt! z9=E7EM8o12WrTgn;I-R7E``4TDdOk2E8|P`tlLr5A#R@=ax|W6v@P-vZ{G);`qwjW zh=aFp!#GPq|0f)8Q;^43S5?M``loj9t}#LJZ7k~$;n$CUu|C2fGa%6akf-=w>u`BN zB*UqmCWCh*qg=%(hWntO`u}XXSp&I#H{_^)#*ExPEtGyAc%7^Mx|r)%SCjtfnn*v| z+}u?)nzf$_IURV_bw~6u45#&qVYTe1o*8RbggI4#pYWg7D;CI?xb9gW&Tx9a0LkaO z+;lFNPlX&km%8h8&z)S}4V=bTm)=8iMKJw7;M6}+8%J%3WVreR=|9Eyecx}}q8OeG zc^!D`4jeoe&2X}h@_%BVZ!FwC3*>10ZO9+jiQAV9obuza)8XLur2?n^ZNFhxKW?89 zxEtGod+&6PfqjAb3g>H#@WTgQ?FDVWRHGkdZ^?Bt)nghD>gqB+>x;X~)3_nN=wBo9 zBLTeI$J<^BHGUH?-}WBbbtysIDRX{G-dWMBaWXc2Aa`jXl*cs;ds>&3f4_95V@oo@J?O6+BQ`G>!|<9kG~If4b}fNf75v(bxj$U ziAz@Y4AuV@=t}@EK7Q=Gq53}s{lEB3tuP+{WXREau3phRZ+Lx=SFHEzOe?pK_pclB z)W2J&4E>txr~dVU_wnbmKMU$#>{ov%{XEyn*fmuD(){Xc|G^#Jzdl9(w!5_Q1KxiY z=%xOv-MsG?q53ZwyhgLXeG{_(P@hx5`*`T6)uH;2)@#&%Zty#m|GHwR{xbs4#5Tiw z^>5yPM!f%p>g$ze=YJ1J-3W~T1Q|D~uMx9)+xYxs0Z#R`QCdZ6CGS%n zsPGg1x-s5$;0;MRqo%kDT(wEggLHhJqp3~B*K zk2LHje~-UP`ZI@J8YtS=!OwK?>LusRos;32*iZGS=z3LLE{5xn2l2IK9KO*nDo*EL zg?H=`~Re4yjI_&PEUch0RpScYj!@>S3174fZyhlvv9mQJD=ubI=)K*zxw@-wl*Z9c=l59mF&fjn0F175e9$H&tBBf=N)6LD1f zBle5)nP$kT>dAPSaUENazsY~W7w2h>*f0L}+ZmbOFgQ-XHSuI+t?(lme5yy8W>v*7 zt&k4LN2LO%de_aN{xMt|fQA03RJ;e?4c@;Cs>MaT#Ur&9g4;jQ^iEz z%1fbB`~+WVryhJ`nE|^aBrWS-kzYzX1t{$I!Co`u?br%jjMG&1cYv?(*Z54XzXe~k z<5S>bzsTcs=t(XouU}FgXJS8(tH@(bgSYh|kY_Jt9$E0*Xa4j8qa*b~JL(6{3(`E` z`$pPz@ppefe=%J;I0JW``B(fuqL z;0p^xeN?r-%TUnP2fiogwxWSnT7qr1I(M5P=wHF7 ze5CwUeJuU^V)>jg>Ja%$`AGSz2S4-i2i0QDq*-o-e#%E$$C$y_{nSVw2fs-w5TAc# z{OsU8+<#+l4(7iL`>CESeHk@BC&%Hh7rb)YcdBv$_uCV#Q{=msTJYOm{w!yx_mL>`-30#elM5b*_mS|Q(67vQ8~9(`t~)8z`$&}QBq#V|2AzBq z>U|`X@4U{5x~Qc%L7r;2riqLP=Zm_i!+v4E7)LtAI7*o$>y5yLUn%%bfJr6q`_Xrm zb;jMh-|1W#g7x+%_(|Z~asNs(+N(D0YM=bm%!zV8A*6=^*9kB@x2n%6Zf zMgE$=b3%U-_@As_X)o$zrbvme$2>3^{B-aeCcYn8%#oX)K2F%r{gU1y{7riQ(+kCI zx%nyJ^L>p`;JY)LJ}(iSo9|Na?ckfD7F~`o2lA;OFnuBHae=q*+vFo9ErLgQD$cXL z%R;BLDg~VU=kM^OJB6MM@NZQxv@9JJm>==E-Nv(>t%d*EQCGZW{)cvJ0Y3`-B_n@7 zQZ^!RzDD|$?bZ%{!wLCEmeU9FX+Fd4OKykMZtbYIF35AcO~r4SPwm!=^W?EFZrS$> z@;A+TwCIq$%vygE;XXSKQT1lH?Q)T59S(w&5*D7wyiVSCfh^(hDEV1 zaDb2ev%kO1`SZN%?^E|f^TsL=0% zTnf^Yk!ST>_7qpUBChEQ`^=|>eVo7M)SO40KgC5UFYNMt&kTAZ+KD(sAtl@w2X(ac zoBT{KCHi|FpBH=+)Ky-WIqQqK@_STYRd`cGzF*i4eZ0?8BRILae7~>Uf|p>6g*+*!uS7D{kGvg8YkP`Uij5z=-FQX)B6(nz1>Fe%j+*E>U{kImodeI z^m9ML{Alpsn>p#r|I7Olo#5~Ix!^~6y)Q9AG43XVPx+Jo{JuoaKPxt7M3Aq4VO-Tg z_{;H2AH4dQ{JunvKVP@%d^B~9{JumpHULRNAS;*ByDWqDP!@R#LxwCQ%4<*EKgLEZ=+uQw{JDPLZf zd)^R|0DHZ#%M3Z|;1@@*W&4f>e^98W zV0iBSGJD>Y-5;<$8}BwZ_6b(O!9-gLIQZa?;cy`>{D*9f-S~X-lsH%ig+bK?p5(m&uI}) znXjC0r-MIo{*douG@oiuoJNx8?#bA8X4GE=LS^0xx#da-pxlN&k-Pe=ao;2r3`Xg-gRpx;fj2hj1 zVE>o_eftd?*ka^Id4xel_9q94an=nx``7P$>y#?_FH%DGdlmMZOdq{3a`59iCvep# z!q1`O3dX5HAp32=jld6u1aIS55^lzM9_PM~DYKI2Uw(Puu2G_XoZnUG8DH=A%R|2t zylwY?a|NSb5N?STa;*QW)-xLN{EF~|LdKmU)cRdBjHAz=l4*T8TMB_ULTWwn@7ao4BkhV^qX~(JioV!^=~;@GgH>@ROo-% zq)EW~-3Hu^G`;ftslk$dH~jJdPyKFE>k#0yUQ0*4=KARcukW5Jm-L9U3WqOmroSE`-;=FORh~vdDb*21J zK>e(;e!KG5ob~V6-L00aKVG4~@F~;79R0qyED`ep-f!=# zzfp^QBKuPyAN@>}hqcqhfcI~6{^{VY?^R|2w!!@V+m{CFZ$G_jbySdPmcPa9J*tp$gIsX*k z+%MD^F!VOpXR7xp--`Hi{L;ZMSG+(y9$Vm!KOWJ|L>#lg>$5!eyzGyuzlaCF-{!B; z?`;V12Xc(h+8NSTj(2J?%=4h<)R77S?-#Nc4bRa1@n1Qf8IUugyt=PyK+v{I7P;dMd{|74jzV4&O+7KfwPYB7gS(Mu&gr z@YqZB!2&ru(yASHI=P+uap+F~zG~55kp(3C;<>zm&tG>wir=T>^Yasj(ZK1qKP&U1U;6msHHehD|?JGH!Ce>3FF9^S_#{TYzwalGx$ z;ZK7jRsO@DKi;3EA1wSIKW*%(5D7QoJikBiQ+I(xeGVRGPZ9l%1-$5&ee#Fq;JT#! z0=EOtO6y|`lktZl{w&|9Wvg1UJp0G(>+t=Fd%2#F{i)E){vDe{uwIx#&*{pCzaFDsc7nI4V^BzZ+~Lw&<_9z489y{6kM)sLg~5JRbVE{@nd0eT&BIhyCM+Jxr{l zUEp1NW6UZ7Tl>#Y@l@^;ejgnIa|q%I{%X!0%D8SYvJ{ER~l%@!-GNoRrA@yv$eHlLWqQ z%Y%dh24?=ZJ?Y?&yVr`+zt<1XsSp10$MfP`{^c9Q#>?ez1)t;p&ZigO z;`saIwcaQ(9&r2W7+U^7PX50AZ^-lh^+xrM&OtW8p!`#S^Zt1FlRI_Q5}pp6>))BR z@AlM4couN(Pb*iRaa=3m5hH}ZJYH+}xsr4e9tE81@3;e5qh*EJ2+eUyn>$t0O|BX^m6@)a0vgoeCN47t*fyK3n>3c^m|d@-Klb+lUzTtV3!qm-22UckjvMBa^w2- z*^ox{)y^FKF355Gn{0M8(nvVRKLxz@FUHl*EB?_HMEuji`}n6(O@s4@zp_8c0zdq5 zNH?}ySSR}L1cQjLX{3l#zu3g?Tu%P_*H^43xqf{-UK6V}3k`Dp)iYjo{sil2Od&l%#i{To`CaQ-{;4!i!3PNDd=yKz+366 zJ0@JhypR6;>e~<#MJ4ATKEJ0f8vJPRe>zdBv7Rq>K!o`G z`~$yt&Ix|IsRcTQ@`4n6DjzfEY5d-~WbldN^G9v?Mfe#GnW3AC7nwe>avb9h;Qa37 z&Am#rJXPe&1B|Bu=QYUs=dbhiKihCJaGl|V(9h*P?CU|tp}R1)SrVhTli7)VQEm#FN?q$1@1= z5`Jn_UXE+L@Fx-};nWT+(rNk|z8Z|HW@LWILSTr#%q!iLaWTZoqbsyc@XfoRD8QcAE5E5{=5K zh=WIwKaZ=N|G_?qE#>@G<5546f4Q9lmU8|S2c>?FgBST2A#X;?aj;6i{eDyw>+xul zNbd*Td(Lf=%G0axBS9gbTs2UB*S>#Ol`TGxyyKBw=h=(=8li0qFqP;ZVJn(Ezd+_c50q5@zd@yUGm-kmlp1(g}0dMAS zDZ^y@^b>{u{QUt#v$Ude{wCn;=VvX?{Uqn_z9{VC_!s^B{uw#`cF3y`zfBwR1$Vp5NC$y>&>4yl<2MdHrW1 z4%OE*cpC7164V`7{zsyIrwv%WSFRs+$a%q=yt>Sva{T#vU6M)Y z`D1>c`ttRWB*=RziFUBP&ceP@{ZuD?DfSaeKKk$m)#9?cTo2%C6Yx89!gq9Dc&Fc@nL+*#(l}-To{auH zqmJ;SQO}}b5D$I0>~=nAAUp+fN#KQzef_T- zFMA~+pAO!zAAUM7#Y>lk^E}TAntgXcK`H-uTn~x(T*PI}>y%%@B|Hk}UC`tDdhtnv zglE+aw7){#J7(EGE9B#muIm#NT1b+2;XKdRw6+Cz3QKtWyMg*wO=ww7j!!z|_4Ner zsrym^IXe+m7?R zzBzS0*P-$7o;al8Mr z%IvP;i++B}xay0*c5iq&Ls$7=_bizn3l ztU~Xfwh)){w?Urs-?3+G{}LDGqh z?aNlM?xxFoV(OF46hHIS!1#T-^GWp7){p(wm2ewyj$faZZ!PP#CMN@$VMZ>xr^` z`0UM&ziOKB%UwFNLAY5cCp;48lcDcRckf*W;1qu^{7GLd@{0z4-n98Q3!%Ri+Whtf zd%)-R*^Q=Vh|F83`RPg_6o|SGC<0RW%Eo9j1vEIQ6r9 zy^rUCmajw{8*Dt>Fw87?{FnI3d7vHq36+-a;dw9fDSt2aPxyM0F1|@W4fM+SyPzi( z>HMFsF5!7H>y!B=@G_8I=+n4g0V6X-D)ZwJr-)g?KaZ-5m!7AP590Ivm)uWTz_0ZB z#|hyw+4q0)&sj>uH6FZ6w~C)&wS*g|i*+gM>ohC*Gjx%D`BcbdV*PpPW#3BvP80ew zfOGjK4g92mT)u9F{+^e%{3Gi(%@+Q${`)+R9%(K`mk~hs2abW$!TSY9D_3MFKkcRGAc}m`&V*Q-I>cxuca{dVl`K~i8J!Sdm zYGU4y1m3LQzbYy3Z>8cq*YEOO8g3|R6agUn?Z7jTK69)~FDBs`h?_o9_*rmh1$A)= zH{pC#RT0OT-5WYfNVo-fL`{Len-H}#Lc;C9y}&<@ocpAtgeL&!_5G0x!#^*TgJ-Wp zL(u4MUS4pnT!CLls(gpfzwC8lDDW+t8vhuaye5)xs{a|#&+|<4JTaepH2A_fgOOM{ z2k}$E=Xs|7YY~?wEzYgWYaPMsxG3o}h0=YxNzhkj9TkL!nD$ZEg6kmq%e2kWCMrx#Dl%ibjLGmvUKuhq-z9w+9_;mGf& z-i7wts}E^H`BA)iT~Y}6p}7lVzFHQ}>!R#+VG-a_uYM?Z_a|*Hwl{vBh$pWT(y*Rr zwY=Hoyw(X;@VWe4`0W_U2zQ4RqumI z@IKN45eIA27G?RJQG_R8pUMJ!lRA8`5g8C}0d5EGZC9>UdEj)NNqPN;Ai6G;gnjn} z$R!~qoUS{1q~E@LvY%V8Oa$Lie`2-Too1h1ME@r{Qt`a4=Qpv>upxH6R&69ytd}#P zkDtpmEEN7OYP_`zJ+H`pHuIIwU;@+X<|1MfiTP1khbkv?U-o#5Ttz2*`< z2dId5uIF^!;8*(Qfj%TKd;j|pl<_7CJwKKRyV4+^ozG(7KgXB&zIqlEf%Ej6{Nnq6 z?fXSM%B)f28~MHynRzryj-qy%j1{?~s$f zZ=VhFMm&f3aG9xekWDZse;07Rzwbts%nE7=PXW&Bjg>QpzNeA!bl}_%j4eE`qMkC*Oee`lEEWE7KM+=ESwGo-E99fV3tM%1vR;zs`+HreN4L1(R?T`L-gNzam{T!dQuV{XTO(yq8+)A1x?% zw$ECz)+cIbPW~y-%jK8y!{GKB8Ati0gIB3unN@j}AIC2Xy!W;~zK~b>Df^>{6(T;( zrnUMfukv$2p9Q>!Pk&!4mmk+(zW;Z2?E~ck?*D}x_YbrGxqL|Nko*VE@zZ3~eyovj zZa?YZt&VxLKj8jfoagqPf9tLqvV0csh?T<6^AC?^%J=^&$CoJZQj7;u#Nr^{a%xi+>yu8*u+G&U1a-w`WfOe6l>3H+VO17T%g)!c)*5?7*wX z_AXIC!V_?w>+|2iD+(5ra2M)x5_pRrI9G;CxD|LR@S00U7Bv9(^;f~l^2z{jRA}>& zh0yL)IEb&T?|Qe0%dgio`3swwDN^Dq`?o0Y+rFG#Kd<|LmG;=d??3%)N8Y#KT=KHV z1^$zs`RDVxRpu-0Nd>>-wO+G|GZ87RKa}$Uf@q!)fpIPi@}|`y4ut#f|CN6G?9Beo z1HZ4xZ)Mv+7#-py3;f!VHjUEq^*YG<4QqwJ?BDvsBci5VkM!UELHZ+svwwfQ{Pfr# zAJ+8GZTf*iTR{f z@g1ar{4uT*@nC<;)YVVf+NRKY#?8Rl-;B0tKi|pM{{nEe4R{ke;XAaa7wR7#{G}uP z-=|+~a)^Ch&i~McGyg2QcGnF&$gRl#-jz_3x#6zt`s7jMU*l}I=ZRNF`nP6CzZZBj zQs_IZZ!fK?J5{D8{XfX}zJn6G=JicJae`<(~okW&Nl1Ie)4jstv*qBl_u*`F}~Get{0cosctv=lr%) zD}Q4I&hHU41Al*8#RPdC?42Uo8PDUM-E3MX$VS?Q{*0%A_@+H4qh#C-y}XXmo6gNu z+x+6fKHwgtCqGFISO?lz9_f~G-+agOGx9IKfM{R*p1{Gw-Qlu+W0Hsu>pyqnXnu{9 zzv*XTKg-+NmU$)1n;~yQnm%sU1bN=3!g(jscV>T4NuC$Fah~TzOG96k;CUVO7b=tw zzo*Uv{vK2P&Urk?9PC7U;P0Y&!LNF?XQw=_(+2bRO)U8CwPB-($F$J9os`#U$sYc` zi5K^yo56qdV0~16qbN82>#u*X#{r(R`-hGK;Q8?E{$o0XcC`Gv-k$oaThmXH=l5K4 z{a6@#^IDKukb`{fyNLL&ic`L(G-`C;(Z1H*chsmc!yQuFB09Bi)uzDq9fjWwf;udL zN`L;`zAeDZjvRH1+ZW|u3}jCEp6gKqhxZ*ZI;KB0?ok6rju|+j|3KDD`8yT)r{MQD z?~e5MUBo5-Isa7P7t(@fbN+;Tah}`vtd;LolH0e9^Vux?Z8~jmVYz*KQ7%T{gQu?9 zr!xynNxvEAd0p@@Uq+W;3Fr33^{v?y?Z0XX=l39S`Mo=K$N(-s((hL2Z{2&|5n0{| z+=KK{8T%%Uq@UX-=YPW8q`xfhg`8@O@IUGGAiY+Sw*fZ-Z}8~e`j8wvd%oho;Z3Dd zrTlWN#sE{JZNC5d$8#Ix*gt+gVeXkik?bdN>F~!Bd?(WQUm7Lp&3@Rg&x7*d_L$6e zwXD*PuTKlM$lrwbcSgT2#@RIRH$SO#BFxB4k^18e{i>}Z9_`OKVhe&tIJYZ7SAy4(4=VhGoRJ!kgSO+yYN9-v7P$uV0_1%H|=sb<5N%-A=ReHdC7`eWu0B>Ha z#|^IUlz&Mm<}?Do;|BH}zemKqL<3i1s3pE~-D(2A;ie&7 zsqS-JNrcvexz<&_^Rym}M7~zYn`1<|B;dEKhw7&r=SeU5rMe{es#T&s{Ib5|A1p(- zEgbV3$PIh%{1vXJKHjtZq{w%0nos;x^&c2FI%ZHzf8QvHGyeRt-yde&A>z~V=oeEX zE2sG{F;IT|9ZR-n)9ibdWqTZu<9bt~+T|*|ZY6nsZ%iV1%YVv$g7*ywPsVxMbFuCj z)Vf)JEy{;*zV4I;UU--M<#ZCRZ!GL)`_4b<@Laafuv6e{U(D{Fi}JEB61-L3cOqr` zqH$jTLfCh)bhCH!vd;nDqLTGn%J%VhJlX&6zub3G)}IVH&OcwdyEF3Ap9bEnhD(OZ z`ZICfuvXNU8b6QO9xTNtk@0Uu94bZEuNWfXnTTs7@U(Z1ch>`_b`cHSi~1G~p5>QM zriW(NB=H}Ad4cZ$?|8HNqx?6|`zUgGx`CHAR{VnNDB*a3_j~$^~vo4Ir@F}6%A~EKbX$8 z;PyxMJ0Z{hFWENlh~&RE@!dfCepA=-udOM9B=3g22kG&MGvCSfIS^mQZ;st4Zl;Dj zw>Q;y!td^LRgv;IWyE=IZ!xcz8RYnKe9YiAj;q^RN5=UMvd@6}#Q85fxAJe~|%SeX8BUZ_a<@o9jFB z(r*Os*0z>wWc_BG=l1mM)YB5d!hOI0UgT>7ugB+24uwd#jqL{h^Xj_I^%93-w69w*4+I@&ff_+j^B=Te?6Dtr&WG0_sOx+hY=osd_9oo{(RB& zzYYaS@$&-b`d8{DJ3>JJnI@KXhL1pMYzJx1A~X zPd4DH?}h)HzAE3+KbZTRr1EoOUcvoqlN0p^$nC?nT8txXf6v(bGv)eWhF%*|SBs&g z1Ii!gGrtjf4)uthCzZd>2;7bIP=_YX3ZejLUKOG2zx{Um?r-3J5prInB8Ac<_0i zvHAP5F167Q`{lV`bb(i?e7?~d2~WX!8{Yf*GWF=-5a8sG^1XxU;9t3Uvp$d4A~&&4 zRQjI<{=#Q3W4OLC-+z5W;Xh$CpS42H^n-{8&u6XpEyvQo?!$SK_r*bo zC1c^<&4c_VP+Ymc&)6o$)xv$;5%P8YH0X=CC+1(}r#zY!98KE&eug9ikAi$Ae%JWu z^C}@`KP~$Y#Zmb^E5nb%uQksf`d+yoIL{}(@_SZh@aN1Fe2V+D37(y5w6mR2C!e5S4 zq3$K;hajGWn}PFn`01m+OXd5k2)6;}{f~_WLK^VCB;iiryw1Fm@Xm%XNxvI7x1*QS zH-48-!acyb9ql+BYtNs92l4mVOn9z;Qn5Q{mXw>c68;6L_6h&^deNLI9j})^kujWc zBXGW6R44J#*jcrQeE?i-2CjP=y@q1{M~yGl>zh>dcfmgYf^5L~`boc5t;-z0vw^RF z1UZ58^^*}(vW9diYb?+D-N5b-^ajp{QW<^Po)0EmX|dSLPh=bK%VR0 zMDwq^^1NKk)f@$Tv|H9Oe0< z+I*tW_`vtsasSBklA*WvSLgjW)|VIG1HJcySB>TUHRh9@I{e_2=XRgQ3>e5f*-qm@ z;r|jt+;7WX-)u)5(!*;8PI(SDqHkPWEUt*kdhF1XeBtDiW|=L{vmTynaLRMxm=XPl zjqzQNWt%9K^(8~!-Gmiuk8j#ujc_?0#y+C`IR6pj-NP3%wkYF4d<)(q!~Kcsknp#} zt{Fu&XcwfL4qyH{*JGiN`=`jMo2IEHoaMNDn|=QAI$7QgdG0@+ z4|t~o%Ln*(K+JbM;D^QLE32^yJNU2cALr`@|Iw~+C-<8YKl?ip%r_hs@mSZqjgI?K z=2JYJ&}Rm3Wc~z~+#hnh9QZ!S@(NEM1v!NVl23#j_s2=;;jPsY&Tyngy(52<&OvW+^-mqig;X^9CtU&%*-79yspSZKNJoAubKug^SFK-qP%|W z1po5Ofvc6*kI5c4^yY22zl=;-}dlmC% zL#ptXlv4Te{R=Aoj`sWodxH{1mW12D=k_z=N^D`Zggb%r_`iAX=1v;mK3lT)s(4M! zyY|Iqn^M*!Dl9u)lp=X0`U<21ER=pZ}O%8PZE{+RHuW~EAL zJkRmPEjR;u4bWo(?@Z0vyLHebw265L_oEya3;26#UVIu1|73nD?gMcnpLp=U`?y%C zkUaSOd^NYTB=Gwl=vhMVWX&Qa`<3k|9sC9@&C^32x%tX=q(3g=5~H2iG0c{muWUzA z;Lna(GMCpYEJgNM6z#|ke)zZ#wE4}<6e;nQ?Z^fGfN=x+7KqHvSGJ>6@V9pS*1^|v zS&H;4+ff$yHR{jW9c~D07sOY#BhxP;KGmD=2=UPa+7ZpGlM#Fo6+XK{(!h5O5&Z!_|MRPTS}$LF3OM}px>kb6 zSf-R8`N{Q|_1Qla{3_P-=U9f7lAkJtKEh~U#CSr)$BfiEQ|NKvx2%iyMG|nHOz5f0v!_8)UzKXmz43?<*0P4&tXmKR@S}f#1J8x;~Ds zH*tT%d}Vn@oD}|aIBgzGb4J;IimOo(2MhS5&*zWU)=>DL9w*WXgHLZEj1KCLT;TIK zUt)2GVm#laa$$dyaepNH`|g}}HMW?rFkAkcxo$ge+BpR8zxo^m58)SJ4@C2k$ZI<;2 z$RFpEkZwFS;#Z!p`SZtlUZ)<78@it7XN0HB5_V^R*Kt(Ibv!SlcjSr?>_A)$@@PnKzzQBjPJv-f?wc%m6f4pW{Q;f+<#dz z#J+F>_}1;8?FmD85zS69|{60j=kJ~r*XD;xE){1yH+^7mT z{PrpOvlQ^#cNtQJ?%z=KXSv3&4DhEet1_XGPrKZoQNOP2&&UAk*W20z{{>dmI-{|*l(Vc$Wx2e<`z{uYx~@EV+O z>pj#f@Lq<$6UJ+5!g)VkbxzoS^}#RM`~8Hc+!yl6cyH>|qyH@DIjF4P4Eb{j?NT`g zvVI%zW;bpRrSXCe!ksuDVHN#nkJ^cybOQF{M&NFw+b?KK%GbA2;GYNhA7Mj3%(?!p zQN=69Auo8Gzy6`{kLAb3M0j)Lef!_%MO-Z4bvFK6Ilp9IG}f^y=v}|=!z|vrApdNT zcLU#W?nooqemA~z$>ke6>cLLAd|AI6dg`vZeN8Uk1boMmF;4OhRG>t{UtF$3>g`>W0uOk15`IUl$C3z2U)vv<8 zrX!9&2$OIl&U5*PFZriZKH&a-7wa}IcQg2<<~6*M$8+kr>Whu_-yirXmy-$y#U~Tx zmH=jRIUx8?X5 zfv2w&^)3I)&=*qqYLh}l{Ru*z$(uhog#Y^UH$&cr^myozD7pQ4VYd@__hn_4`Gzb1 zLH3#9pBs1ubG__)Y-wCl_HQKUU)OM4Am>F&IIXL)q~F9(RrHh5eMNl}`e^gu!aGbcZk`BT0$zM3GH!1}RnO2Tip zf%r7OdT^e8lU@A26JEcq{QdS@EJJ>0DEwCaCj4M|ejf?T_iS-_Y>vEd9aAl^{QvrV z|DPmF2jy>rK5jq8p5EVrP{7oF_qzqL;JsCtkkTV9s{oaeVGmk*iLzV@tF)!Q;O^e)fEv;}da3_&dB@|1~=3 zWj>X6)Lrphp#{8uM?ZKFjEi4{$KyPgce6kKtra5ULxq0cZ&})<;5?04r#O8b)^m)KT)Zr_}Ni^+5RITS&xHY7sWpv@>xh9G(XZzBjFL(L|k~@azFgb^I8dy z0?y^rF|E}GorGI~bHAs0)#gR8gxipBJb2|dH+F>pr~1b4?@B?rxxn+Lw29WkPZ14K z4leLgz}ppGYka5_4{i@xKZv-;_KIo8?SbOK`^c_|0$*2d$6mElCZ6c%MeLhwFs}ydznQL$vXNLHTj{ars14sJM>n4dGmVyr1+ka@Fu4N!|s$DM+`3 zmOi7A@N}H#_O*P;rWV9n zA9xhsEQNhDM*p}nKXA%VIo?EE7xB23nWipa3CvIShsT>J@Lw#yqbnGdo39*i?BE}& zes5H`DK}p^-nhUY9DKW`AtEF*6f4k4JkZMK%VCf zrawhIWIoLs%s5X(El z*Aw7BaBhdElkdLG>px$;&Az|H44&$yh(p1vO*xH<;3d6xbc5`_8TZ|=|1GC#hs*gp75e}D zIqs$Gzm4rfx_to2fBVg;ro6u**MB$HgA5UmY3aQV zhN7K|+9K8!x#~aoFFQT2!~0asC;OaS|G>L{a&jr2vlDJa{dWRCUTx=ac|R)|_Z4ve zQSFbfvfnr3ufLGv_J6##b67z82cF&kMI3J-_ka97Gu0j8cY$K(RC52v-)%Dj|7gg! z#kigO?QbjUH{)qPTk6QT4RQ{Aw{1bz_haSu?*z`zMYsK+kCEd@`uV$UD)3ep*Ssa$ z=fQdY?oEjg5}wHUdx5i`gC>`=AqpG8t;m@c+pPZ+U^W*OxDGu|KL{&{$<%dh1481D)HqoLjDccjb!y2vL|CP%*pglpK8)>H=Jud~6H`){D7cuAZExEp@ z78CU~6Y`~Q6syDe_~V6gX88vRFEnf~;gR

%%u=W9P}`Z2%sPbYytuCdodn3*SZK z^>-9T`upm zr-9`;`^?H>a{iGI0{z$Ae&<6ue*^GnqzjF&_Q>@;4RLocUcS->xjrSbJibS=;9RN6 zeBYNZK3dN!u|9L5UmWYbSz4|iX^`jmU92;AkZgaZLVuA7DMpP^XrTBT9tQf?d-j=B zdAy4R&hwR*#YZ2L$Gc?K51#KmBg+avKh<{wzN@FgywU;QTb~TSo5yz~a+Pp z>;dw4?{F4)eLMVSknMLuKg(|!GSDK&FXC?zpD3iK7v`%dk25LIYXyEKEPp+DoUsCr z2i_&0_n9x3Zx-aD;9tn1L$BrXi`W$C z-_1>xm$9wnU(`P$KI~uH*-O8c{L@7Mw<7I3wBULvEI%1SrKkw9O>Dg&Yq^{ ziRd6a73X<8*srQn)c~BnBN2suJ|1Zl{LO&eny`lL3K;|U#pF10Kdyf&;&A0vWGH{% z#BYS}PhS1F8T`%1f=xx3h}0i9jMEPAJPp48f!`5ExC;He8+hWD_EY%YSK7Bz?yr$* z+IMqe-^&9zFH*w&*MFto{(U;ddnWk(9YUY)I;P@1GY21sPLSJ!7gBtSk1X{U9!>PYQX>s8o4_f)ULLK^i0 zav4bb9JqLq+oL~@3VD+CUw;N)pC$Z@#PvH9esc_n@8AE#dHU_Im&3$*gX^{RSg}vl zWlpNnUHKFXF=2Rp0zpezSa?$OAdP4pi;LfNMe0KDQS*Uw3Ua zc!yTLPNaGk*sjl2I=Nkwvk#tq-PH&lUw18ktRBpaCK!LQJ{&ybqp?_vNO6-{|d~GxQO;+Iz0& zLsZX2e0KFZJs{NALCfV$?Iu}qoi-ADvV_XdQzo$d4Bdhk%H`(---!9h`IH{3rR#L+ zMBI=3He73QX61=WqfhLBex2pH(9hS2rVj7-M1FqE3;kUG20YGup>_ymR6qH;nCgY_ zbJNM9^Z9xfm5+z*1J2ipix-|*o9{n{Y5x9?uWOhe3A@aYo8NejO=n|fPX2D_cYxP; zsk)qeozRW*Jg(GeU11#oPrgMm}|@O|5f;CaB)r*Ezu;uU`IU*hw9+X>$YyJo&}trPkP?19&AHfpthJWecwLf#{r~DG0h4Vaa96UAcuL2St@g}g| z7mJQ_6_oHO;9T#&f47D+T*9rux!xz-)I}SB`|4Hp^?fhecRctr*NoUwC`pt9|0O=x z^9aP-1^&;I-kng`#Y~YBpX+(z3Q-SJ!QXNH_{|~-x%phrjo@d2KlEmcB}LfJJvqE)KlEgFp|W)I~1>l6I6g4gvIou@c>geT&;CcYj&`Ci+68k^8VINvAE z_3_cYCYOTHo(NBcUXFM1<&Wm6B|HN-*O$(98lTfhIM-u+knqDWer;PVaOwv*o{<=j zOyE8G^txH+7IyMq;`8$p`dHDgTEJgX{z0+eL}rSV?B{+U9=x&YS+7D+u7q=Y<#BFl zUCTi=%7t)luiT!?et3CWkR+c0y$;;3eXwi$FXi^03S6%i{*Qdr_OM2hH{m>w1KUd$ z_(Ut=7T{cdQ_g;3*Gae?ILH6}gN1JeOL!9UPXKSp)zJs_GLG}y-e&JBwlh@1Q-O2& z&-%yyT^Mj`4}3pO66!$)_&?u^nw~F@_Q2)M?Ln^*aXCMx_m=$ef#v7dkN3=`Jizrv z@Y_GOJt>e!dq{vCcJNL-t?+FLsXg$#B8n>r3{yp4t`n@2~dU;QpWL zA3v{>JW8zN4WmUGJz(5ztuxSmsz2$lBMa&MIpZhm5Er@raetjwB6OevUd|rNygeT!Vmw)w5$7*RMJQX;{EAdjPwX*#g zz`6c)y|iU;uq1B+uGa}W`_(w~SBQ+`JlC(gd}to^h0DkK zP}CPY_)CA9wL8q7yL?>G>jKZDne2@KkIE-iVc&x(+5shjlYM+Y53ge~z(2ieb8IPV zV1BYcypGWai?|rtNBmUUlAF)-US7vUfgfSas8}W{H($Aqv4j8QO_%7hrrdnxI>rV5 z)mp3el#2*lmyrF+=QUHoZ`Nyhzqj;(e41zRI!0dK(E8Vg`FR%Pc@NGMBH|(Q{p(+x zCl6?Sq-rhNFY`QeM0pEbt#ji&@o9_1`FT5fR?-;>_0RKk3Fm~o8+yAIDtsu|=!bp! zef>Vpn_WV_x3*pH5DDk^f3yB8A7=S3y64Dy*kMTILNH>AAbKK z$Nj==)w8~83HJhL`(|zHRzxG=2B*-^{hG1b^QA#HmH#09#!wL#o+qvuTIGxyxUZh& z+&=^!zn`YXjR{|A!1F8f{gL^s&jz`^Q!`p=(Z4gF@@Mw!GmUwqK= zqH2fGAm`^**tg(hp_9DM<@{tm>r;gZ|BHpLJ*u@aQ>0{{wW65cM1oiA<%{XO&Ly1d zH{;E%Q_9G=4RTJTDbxE^3`RaAZ>kiiKT}<^p)Bu)oCj&Ld3d`JN#2P1!~V3N@p*o^ zd{y}Z%lF`*Dl@ozDSt2Y8o@h1d`Q4|+{`%7^*iS3nSVp2{0);u{o?X_-R6!}Eg#T{v8dd7ii_1+eFB@_PfEqpFaM*0%kahMCK>sed}r9XZ1EL=ly$@B0fLQ$Nhz>fbef#{jnXxjm#7& z#YcsGt4Q!#9hp?u03PAS>4E)M>Y_qRsf6U+? zG+wyQ_i-?v?6tuT2Y5ei=rOF2Q7{O1WBhUhcOPASy0C^Xx%NJ%Mjz-u@p<0M`Xj;rr)@)(HV^&$9vjwg13#(3 zmp|z8(4Vqe?? zhQfjU!Trb@De`k_{JjP4FXprhdWZWns&5>RXy{?P7pxBNqqfM_iur9Mcn+jtahoP+ z!1LFCoag?r(|5IQX(gQP<^Jy-N3Fl5>j&B2hhSWF@yT}XA7y)0MTFmM@0a^pE#~zt zTTS+OVUH2~_U$j1(bxrp@MxUp{`TPWv`6xDL;PN3-f!|&ALje0MUH$TJcM#9rLf4mp@^#>_$g#f4es(deUCiwr3Px@S+DD2?BK7Z7nbWvYw z<79Hay|X_!GQJD_Bz;b=z-_n=!PgPKTJb?ktrtQ_{P|xC_bT`6slKRqJ%;Df zjKzfg+sl4cEuTA={lVU|!XDm-j|Ttmb!GDB&mC`_1LffaZ+xeGzZ7r@y_7%u7wr|# z10;i2_0wI}f(g0vSNfL*zRUDpPSA6U&3_bWg#mw zMM~|%gZ5(sFR59pwS~bWeaiki5xghWwdIST-LqDI{)+xO8T{iV*K{fxm8-wb?w`27 z_JaSYX_=eFOsrX?q+i)z8%l_H{PkYZO2s2`>sR*IX7ImvG)*s|57h6!zN6S5AO?+} zndrA2kk>%ejo-@gGX>{~M&p1PMdrJzxw2gr||N zS*Gf5S-)4If8KpdDOtYq8{{y#K=bKk0wGzpUR3Ikx|Y9WkHD`i;PC zNb7ZbyjImkGX)>aV}q-zEP|)We}?SAQV;XD%(`rh*?q#UhS#{h|ItX}=Bp`pXiZ>kO1j z&OvlpNWDl2_q9`Xmh{`F^FN;_A2@8(K$4-u z*Iu*d+om$Y?~}8t4H**G^c3UKIM456H^fbo7|ip6s4i*_p}O`_2F?MvhQ@xG>SHQ&s9_k*m(jAsJp z_py(Pt@FZk@jd?tY-rLY`ai{q?=j?*?@6@x9n~Rrbkms8 zM8rYya$=qk4ZUN=%=zl7p)%*Eb>ckvLdW)drH_dJ`TfzkfoES=JJCOkxzvBA;{Gab zpXs$$B&f|o1K}RXdy%gG>*A*x;MBhOx|ph*@Z01N<3{R?X&bfR32kD&7YRK^1;14N z5|4Cw@J)DsT?+T(knrD^ z!MO2+I-0bL^5ybzLhsCTh0kb!%jM$+9*O4}+wQG#M!8??j|a-fqu`J17L}xYPlb=4 zJs-05!#Wvq_xh)`4>tSF%>G05$p+kL6mdw=gcJ_32nykRKNepH9J#eZbdWO#cR()n z8*yJt%J7=!gC(5fkqBPQzKPZl3Af=oCaV|9}2%$GaCHRR;ym*v*qUVeJK21 zO(*zY7A`R`kNx26_hcISi~5@k{qyLHX*$e^s1n@q3u>1GMi4S>iwkiqN!|lLJmCFx^y6dy?^4}drB;YV}ArT&cPABmmC`n}cneP;0dg8b$2R%H_YCMGVp$MXup z^>+i;-=`PP(5Y=A;DqzIWrqA2^}i7s;BtRu1a3n*k zX*kd0%hVE4MGFC^{FL+YOz?Yq2K`ewigOYv@s;y&Lv<0KiLG}UiMGvRq>=*W}Hf+Rcx`EkFHGW>QD zeGs zdQ7lU_`!eks&5J4ckR(-LWqHxA|<}Ey`+HO`0p`?eBDT{`lgIGX`+5434Ufkp1)HO zQCq}EE>G%5B5_{G=Ufj?T`%Im^TH7&i}aCYiBIJott@v*pRZiB>F@jw-ZMe0#vV&+P(&^L<>r3R zILYLFKkqMpxaRqO&$;KEd+z!?$#ce#3j~3u<2vQ-AJ;z`A>Ml=KEdLX34Y!|Z4QnDE?%K$cxl~ zys$ETUca-?VXeb){xsofYWkj4kAx1dE&uWPiQyxu7GHdo31~MD^mp0+==zAvp}Pc2 z!c|Ga-beqTG%AmSfaOOAImu6Q=@_(2&f83Ip)Jhe~v*{W?ShQ|X>M)_5vGGDNH zNv**52PwYYX0JakwaffShaAY&fPk4S-}_im>!Uix|%X>5?84e0pnDU6*Jxl zOni7h{NL*H{{AQQTTwbkr);BsBJ#?C>$HxyzNc2xzF5>3_uFUw8J7`TxuFPRZcks?lU5t3xJi-bCm3yj` zr*+!%J@*H(=b2Or{LVc6R>DZftn~*c?VJdILOt`PKURE?tHI-^H&w|3m3f*G;LrZ! zs_h}kKG>JXS-=f=ZuQCmPdPQiwFVgv8c$ze3i&A%xHlf*&IPi5&0Ja1_wfcsmD#FJ zRrq}bKW(1m#gSf=jsv6j(YZMZ`S`Fe89aJUs`T-1{s~VZrYuGKB;mb>^gfF;$W;z6 zR5S3rUGQVUk3S-xhsXp!x$dN|Ba-~}i+-O1d$hG=Tyia3d_2UmL)8LvP_Rf1eEY-jb}t{`z%wrN3o$GoMChYnJ~JdFzBe zBX~W&yLyY(+XA=XI<33*HouxLPmpyx#m5GI?}b+;ftFpX$cw=C5TKY(O|ZiOdCChn z{-*X5e32K5db}M&6sCZ7j-4XgRq(xjsNDE_MESn8#I@au!KY@fp1T>iG7Ovo@yEeJpxZ9yYM|8XQRWfDL)0C4m=Ux zgV=QM{zBUS`Sg=K@WBbK*5rnM@w-UrsGr)E-t(oXFXOSk?2xZS?0KGud<)DA5hIar z@uUy(CX6R0{LS@*ueiG*G6ocG%8S@suME84yzZuY%RafF0 zu0*F(?g+aB^$Wei?lh7^Np@@FWgG(S*5kUAfA{_P415ooz6TorUG8|wH^CJjG2YUB zjx_Mi(0BH|wqJw<MCjYq?&M$pi{B~W7yTz+ zlVE-;0)AI6o!RT_Pp#!S1g$@7&Wql!ikA)wT-#9kN8|F*w$}=T02lsJ|BnOD{6fZW zNAInFsKJxkWINNjAJvyYa)Tf^Tcw4=aFw-35ch#RrHrE#8ul!#*4n+5|6*R9?{QDxGv;Heg^*jAN>xW#J%Sx zdE|Ibzb|;$n(rslDcXs~0b75We+%1`_K?2<*Q}J+sU2U|nQ$wNjjJx$<3Xu<-E4^l zxVN3N&ugiEU1RBI$(ALf=zf^6ReVH!4(Ks}*K^%b7wvlmo`C&|8F-HY{W{QjAI~eY zC)JE|t*LJhlV7qnUtZ;~&knsw-S=nz-Z1e+{RaGgy$ig75sNC39|EU%YMMwtV^qUJ zx&0*XL0p{!YptU58X>QToDpS@{3$cYKY?3OuNip7kcYqXb4&})sVLt0v`@$L_O?Tg z;;TM&t1P$A2|Rv)jN5~;(H>qu#PwV8{tD9nW!VFM?;&vD_dLze)2zU~pK1Ln^c!*AiZbu6y}$DKxZ$52`1$12 zskH9&#TU2}xI3fq3clW?{L_GUY-{d3Jbs#H(r+X1#czkCF#l9pcV&O<{IGc&kyp>U zUmc)Yawhw^QX}MPo!9@;l5(ME|GFc%Ui*}0;Iz&wym-vXtc`L{;Kfx|;Pr%n_Y<~m z?2xk?7Ecxb_r+(X9A`6o$mhL3I`>manqLI&B>i|l_sHM%e!utYLA%j79J8%n2ERX~ zF-rewo%q?bQ&ze^B*p_f^t(~&!C%$&!_7 z0ss1StAp~8Y7qYFVTT>O7tt?9uzXR{yhG0+58oN}Yq3rD9||2_d8G$(^c?cp9rL!w zcAwIWa9wj54|)zc?%>(Vs$Rd009+xID=v6Hj}qTr`Kjs4RpS3%`?K?f4&$r#UiaqN75i@j7x8yN zp5pHrD9<}iE^8kfbUX#0;_t!VW!AQA8!Y}V#82Ns#;KFOT1Va=-ROrV;3M+I-Qw%e z!1+)56{4_V9#TT1^V?tMN;E!R(3g=D?CEM4o374^P|wf$bIZbGg>`bA$iVd!lp8anD`{eVux}i(74fe> z#inn|>(7Fmww3hz(|X!=5llV~*U7(oQ`6Lu4A&L)*S|9%b|S5*h5aVr^qga_Lm&Pc zlBn=~1a2E8$GH^Lv+$czL(~jU!*vJrT>fDDd!g^}?B6BN0Po7<$}Pfxi+nIvk>hw0 z{LBLHW}y#ngeUmS$o@z4BL~{cg7@oaTg$jao+;l^6Q51>{YTiJ1by+~ZQozU9s!=f z6HqU;f77R5T;ubwKEywMa~7Ol&F9H9=%web8n?<969T)1{`dnjei`7MAN15h&vOZX z$o~}JSt!$+EL;2 zK5c4W<|6G2gg=SEQ&IMC+{vAb=}*UX>MwQvUH&E-xY*yPpuMR-B%pmVA-ASo!%E_J zAe4%CA08*l6GdC;zp8PKhIwM&amD|F<%t3Oy|uU274Ki?AHfeCm(1XsANMiki}(n^po17#j`FwXdNKr z>HEiV;6>l=y_`QMl7Q=p`2O+CX{BF;d*drUUcYmE|2PT!9|t6zr*TTMCEwIY_E-A8 zW(xSlKB#k&?!R$<;PXG};Qv0S<5aQU}L_Y`qhEwu$jY- z(=yv@uXlWeK8j=Lp@N-x9O-?)q(24x-(Q=v--{<~5g(y10eBk9r9c0Dkm4ue78l@; zkQ4j&IPf!3l8oXL=`Y1Z@WuXJhwI{R5vSy0{&_>^hXNP%2IAtnsMiEN848@=*<^lO z{zJVftX|Q7G(%*)=~Ja#>`AGoNP(tn{+IKk4Cu4Gy;v;R`H?j+UZ484zsipH!5@vk zo>#=^`7Z~%yw~)DpM`(k_E08(PwU>(5jBc-K9YQc@Fd{0?j86=iIK0iKJX2BUU^jt zaJv8bj<^_!6X6yW8>1@EW7anr_if7kKtTf{h%2As}U>AbOg-jXk9oR*TZ ze`LVl49I=3qUP^>yjFCS{!)LexuMTtHb1M3-Q~W4{B2O~Zfx@t+8v?};cq(}7?m7ZUS>~~np^`}E`Cd!&AeJXJMskp8%$vFJ@@7fh= zRzIDK#RBj9cZF)945#O&vj)m`x)Yw~I@h0$=c&nl*YsEWx&6t|OYy0jHrLPoMBu3? zJ5;$4N%o2HkoNhcpZY`3ajn0hdSq+K_Oe9FcFcsnJIlYGz~iOuEaO1&I=@r>5BG=e zXOaBO=zXQQd>rHxP@XUQM+VvJ&BxGm)SCo+LUP6x9#4vQ3h*kQH-8rPF5c>t%Kr0C zU-OjO+`kOSQ9NoF$y`fu5cOvPr+7D=U2ngi{dk|Kwu_9zfzI3RaR1|QoyOnu?duoj z{-r^G0(b|f=;wyNvp+PR{0ClY$L&)Z;9`7>rF?xT{Y(LG^XnIvBNE9|SqgqC^?&>h zbsG5Fip?k$nUIrD-!F75m-;io-6Pwe7e72#P^uBU1eMfw_JEBSDZgz#5Wf9 z#Di!2XU~CX@Vt2Tc;_1cz2ZMKTGq~3XitjJB;;v4q5WNnlfR5s!ViI`K`-_9lH6X0`L@+pRGt&l6}0tlYZ*&kq+Y$s)t%d_(T0Y z1Nsc@-)`XbIq>@&r0>LU8BwH1$j5eZ=#@q+5FdcNFa zE}sawWRznkH!no~`q~?IrvhK5oz|YW2enr^@bZ>VzYb&VMdJba_u&cKEAF47hxCuy zW7^7J7I6EtZkbQ9;6*oGeV_T4yw^v^`dQT_Cu)4Zjok0m>J zd&PsFjIzy~ts8kfGT~<$@Kvv-AEk2}5wAGJD+Bn6{ly+>5D#Hb3i6-&e-?NVqeExW zIStt(_;jB-3-_tDJ!QO_xRx!6j3cHjMg2+89}nKQtFwC0?@S7u`i}|5E{>N97574=xFaHsr1mK|^j#s2}QqiC2dt{Ez za{fpHZ;I{W(}-aG3Hg=+UX>Azzt01n(3gh&4gFq7I(WyvZd^|rtMK~>e&GH&6Z}a{ zdmqTF^`ra7ufXR{w0&e;w)`_WUyPToWFlhUpJV^*#eL@uurnU=^t?b4{^okbd4m<# zg?bTJI=7+kk4#QX&mtLd9$^pIw>tym>D-3o)5i__;+?!o9r(SMrP?*$l53)Vecyn* z+4G{c67llIwX*Ebq~Az*=v2mU6X z1Yg841J}jh!jCNct|xu}W@ypXSIIsR$E<)jYWqpQN#2J06R~)&`@*kxw^YRnRO(Lv zKX$a7H+#0wo_~VBJ^XBpI!OLG@f--*n*#pg5o%YcRGa;;h+Clj0`%n{ zDLQ<^L{qp^##tkCP+EG=llzm zme=ObxBV&ik-CYJzwJQVe^hb)e9?|6n2(c`@_gdQwM~~O<0X&VYkDU2xuEar(Qi$v zgq-^5cgj8R+cWX|Lm}Ytym6qumowTwRVL=F&yywVb4-%-|0$f| zHsJ9CWgMsV?wni0a0hV8ucl{SYa$r#0#5llKXUQSNQQfW)9;mLYU_R*#c|E_OSt{bxyyoHox|90H=M~;jwvI z@b+;5r*-U}ISroj_OZZ!4|sR;{81(kYai_$+5dEdWgM;)bT!g4oYr~95ZQk>9>Km_))S|&2ai25cTig4~MQ+ zvie<+qyGD6$cIO191`|`-2_VX}obv{_r97hhX(lzdSs+SmR*zIib&u za$jT>1Mfe&q0)cqKO?tgtmFMB+kfz8UV55I{U?|`Hoa#YyA475!Y$F+)*mu%uv=}v;7CJ z#~)o5g#qXGPa%2DPVC_fag$ulyO=F+%{L&;zzi7UFQ7rmK zu>2zX%+=-iru=L}VzB!3&}T$>dwj|bo-Y<$kH!3Pr1H8t!SclhUZb<;=2O0i_Mr72 z*`pu)V|JVbPUj3R$RF;IX(Bs)?TPEOewbb~{Bs@;-3S>En!g@?wqY^FL&#Hm8o;|- ze#lAgAFU@T-nE8KXu$PTdsrYp__K^6T)z$1Y5g)PPxVT{^izC$+zCCw^*bQ%Lb>hY zihDf19$csScX*z{EqHv%Kixg{Dzd5g5UcmKxAV=$muXiNR4W?f= zO8S4py|S;Le(VD+SiiSzS$HbfZ-N|+!+nq1PjUSg;IuxuI5>ZGuHOLMhSGI#_ekD; zF4*q?o^|#8A-w$zz+J#wM6C?x>n{`9-vfO4o-2Rz^_K(vLpNIbU%$%+D_l@(LD)nB< z*Jmc+F5vqPXeZ=NdAI&D0QUgT+#0hd2DlhsZP>q=v5wb`k#ShN*5b^Ebq>uEf^Pvo z7WrTRU;F2^+xaohbG`|DBlMfWe;jq=O@T!J{i4wC!2VSaz72e3&9IyACFJB=z;|Ik z>jeL8e47yk<8$&o*q_^J{|o-Isr^>!;&Srs;5%twKUT))qtkEng<^B^_25~c-vs`M zl>JW&Yjg57Bjx(r2)-5kwCNA?7g6NoyT;3XBK2nn_^Ya%>s>U9A}>o{Ji({mJ#d5H zC^XO7VwpMlwgA3vob-40xc)K4gRHM8f3!Pr{sDgZCNIvHNYAOC^2gjko{L(*A6l(Y z-q?Wkh_IjXhu%kPCws1sy;w3er+&(xtnJbs7x?YtPI*eDKIq5G_|*8fYuoa%Ir)M4V*-EpoIA@ZXmj!d z&z-H{cb{4Ra78bj_W*Hjscj?s3te}BFEoq!SbN`pKYR4iqz-(%)J%}}(|9?^T(?=Tkdy z+Rv(To!rakQzvlRA2zHyU?iVU-N0%8RN>^!DSSTFOqBl9e&NsUm$&ozR1cii$KOR) zU(DA-M&PubERcC2iO;uY;Iy8LE}}2T=UXdqS`Q7bf5^n=TRU)C&y;N0K0lvtoxo|m z(NMd;1)p!-z-hnVq*fsdpKmpjr2n)Zy8HN92R`5Gfzx?Fra7w<&mSXj+AnYUtbRJ5 zZ_U7If4I=5;`tS71y1{?V?UHDnlD9Wv&b(yaM~~I>iApP{0w&jr}g^lXI&~3V7MDN zt#=pizaIY{!!?to|FqsbIs3xXf(+LKr}-tSde?3`h8uy?daiewrRNJVT#x)SgQqHS zzIb7Vr#`@Zhx4R^n%GEw-eQLwt!GAGIQc%0uM@Zq>zb)uzICzwoBjQ@S6AEJ7g2qA z?D&HjV>44QJ}5O)r2q6B-=NK-*FAEr^W6jT#$TxiPS5eZcj)S_HsQ{{Ag?k4ABREV z%iDb~57*Qi1UxjMh@5w5zWpX??F$;KMEhDHPvb}BQ_H8&_#oyxy8jT5^L%Qj_OGji zE7M7nteo?yy{TV5D%-o*f4g6i^jw~Ydtgt8Q{gRD8UI;7fKz;Kz1bJZ?RNpE_SuzkX|kH>C;L3$sq>v{6$+fk)2Wu{yHs|J z`eB69`#a(MBkUo644=!m{PCpdOci(nH{&|x?}LbFbqMfa_0c%^OUvGCgVkq+K0C^5 zX@hpFS$!^Cr~L2r&+f!fhG+W^Ue)=NtAza*d&sZN(R0n@7sbHO|1YHfGl#UyOaA%% z$93!9GC#j4wP!!s%l#+6X`WU-I5bun=byivPwird{^CEr|7kG$tiW9;Q>X7*#N(lv zD($9mCAC(Rk>Vljr+DeX`=!*F=ix!(Mg4{PYvZad$0!5(H;cjh&4cFtJ z%6RGKcQjD{;{MZmgzD2&Uvo?u>mM&sp9A__C{O-aVl?lMnrYI1T3?t-u6P^D`fIlT z;MG|%P7?;4+e7U^_B=O~JP??_!T4tAEq%}Vaj^EI{$&I2fu-7Mo?lK}r}^VZ{V~p9 z`9=2Wus@Ev^~LjG^|_%>^QDYS?hSW-=J{g4by^P`|JbrISiYFRYjv=o_jkzUxFOnu z&M(Ox!>uXZC{6;W^Gh4#k6zn-fb8_OC$7`|pPq|)6y@=70jKp|w?Pe$P&|Y@wWkNX z)GfWwasOz3pm@J}==hE6r}i*Rm+>jrr{7bq--PS5o*z`@h&h;kif^8JEgf9H1@bnO zraCb-d3+tXPV23DidWrve91o-co|#Lztgbz)A=RE|I^(~7X*vHZie)4SpUB+@%S5X zo%SP3qo%pJ{U+eFULJcxU7N>;?6ZJZr)kVn9v{+A`x1cc zftS#=U8Se-kv{w2xxA5#xa#c(+a`YvkfM##JNmV^hynie|VD^Ntz#)TZC321y1X|_bRx@ zhces_oYqgBXWZQFeOah4MMeHNseY_4M#kK=dtd&Xjk`%6^XZ@>zvkC4T=SLmkLHiG z0#~L+FkBCu#@pW8<1a@t+z6b;yL>&iY>i^L890p>`l_#QEzcwcHnfrk-DwKhrE59z-c}{ zvR&hSKO}2^;B>w*;KxyAdHZO-mj2UtotXK{0p31(;56P=8TsWM-abym*9hK%Kcn;H zLH&N?E&87syjtTD((VS=PQYCh5pE%r8@k#^9UMW zX`-}es`twMeX+yR{ALmGG5#_e|jr}66h z4uhZY{SK|aJm76O`t};_cl`1P=P5L=Js#SwE}c{Gc#=Pcc``1mwmJLp^9nPrQyxAZ z64{fVS6G3Q{HR(3d+_rLJ8&9bzpS+ADV^H&up?U^879J%# zgZZPGFa1fZ(C8w!*MRG^KTWx~d>+{wtUj7|VjF$(HZXp{_!j8zbgxmLVD_1S+fmNk z=q$$L;lg#APwLG&eum<~62;fR;OsXeLRb>G}n=a>Hr5EtC)yOi3T^tCUp(|T>_p1(if{^=G; zziGX2ty9m^+&_x90lfAN*MH9aqw$seUwNhB8Lpq=Yk~Z-W|^h9ejBdSdU4UJ9o4vg z2XKq=*ZI_hC=JVh+8F`raq7E z5KO-Zyp?Olg>e0pKdBi1^Aw4i$@LqSNWW=Z%XN5u8rN?EPV4c8?K+?0`gOo9C|}fh z)|t1T19sVfFV=^h;O(aa?f`yy*Nd+sSo@jKt}fu(^8c2NWVi$Q?*U%w@13us81BY6 zqO(aq6Z)Lmn2X^$;0ECOb#I$QGu(}N$OQa@fB%@Ao8da(7T}|n-O%J=xCQgF4fu@ccFa zr}fe5+&!XrewcvM`sLx^t5(gLbolSF`f#ES^6G*iZ9or|_vC^7y+TN9(`GE7s_E{5`;F zJymt%k9~Rkb<3syw0^j(=(CH*-vFHEMDA&4+gI`WA1{G!!`Z z-x-ekl_(dNeVD0?^Y>rWN9zwa^i7Q0SWN|e0AFz!f*p{lAoV{$Rstx zO~5JtTo*oj63TG$#{%B&CePc30T1R6)l=rHVYkRmYESNu1NwS*Khl!h>&A7;w=G}I z=|%PitB=MFOZ&|cf$2Xk`00YySO9zwqd?|A5nY zR=!Qwh5Y=F>@$KltweX#a1f;XgE^J%<&Xg!&Ue%Uqm zvaRHYsNV`XS`QdsU(ew7+kw;hX~RXAj&u7d{!Z{Vl^I@=+fVxu@~=|D{z6gN&2xLZ(eWZBJQ6XIL+6!v-bYZ{iFId-$?(54I9{u`$zg|J+)_j zBk%iB-<>ZTAxHOH&+PdnB$$3Pc!h8Lx{dS)>mPJKZeq=Q3FIdq?r-{ek1Ub5&^!iDWOFaG-;I!V`UgcRK9)BBfnr~On7&nc_ z-vONVCsBJ#@8R)x0jKr7^3cfoJpLZwbe|({vHH_^{B?HeH_dkgUmniI<8J^?&kMEe zcJu=te-m&TZ?*Gx-sJJO0H^Wt+U`f6@c0{GpAEbng`&3PLHzl6X+S$Uz>E4l>IW_Q zDUFwcPxrfY=+`droqvBZG;gf``dIMk`w0&03p5*LJj!fnlNO`R!4C`kK7axIw`os) z$fxk4(NS(pzc6bfW4xAn(v8U zvHFecq*vg&P5%AAN$E0v_xlaNNj@f{>%I`wBjioMY5i~daKq48&! zsy+OABiet7`f2@O1n=9+ZAyi~&S3sfJ%#OU63I?#PwtNu`p#@G7|rc<;5v=3u?s({ z$nA9jC;7DldW_`udVte@V|eb&{$wxrN4HtVCB5jYp5gF^+egpseQ#D^>pJ;!uWDydB`RepBx*Jueh2-n8F{yfCSt z5`Iv;gYiAkYyElXC;zQ|^xw<)H0-Wk!rRA$>$IN#@T`Mf*nrb| zxxlpe$HCgi0p68%H3stbq5C7$Z<5dac8L7;#UI~a^+5h_*NYP5r@(bvq+hh&&;R26 z?c6^Da2o%QT`@G~{!#mwz}vWM&iC9u+K-U`?c4Qg$Mw_rWP^Ozl#5fjeh048{C?u4 zVJFw`0#5Q1Zro|bBNX3Uv)dI37GD$O zD>uHjg~!)|>$Ltjd))n$`)>nI^J8Z3ugh`&$vy{o1B+{Ka{oy`t^eIUnv~%BJ&>dI zfAPD2F6BUpP|kS}`R z?v~36M>5=neq;omR^jEkD2`)1F#{hry<283h8t+S0bcsU*LkBEZl>`X`1389)pIl4 zhWX72yk^qH^gImD-ml<%)V_7)0iLh4U(sxr{y%MgLrLu@;+wr+fxOZCetM=~Q zJU^_!slOJOk9$!6hS}&}eTBF4XROMc|% zLoPaBG0X35j@&u3nL7U6`G5&>w7>u1+#gdy8Eyei{x!ZtMW}a<)fA0Yvi}UQ%#-m^H{k_g1{igodM%`c|-`^X6)BgVD z#c}8P{@w(f`eV%R<;Dct-&?@TXt{W29{9)C7Y5jA18@72J?F5uLDCRd}MReqxHp0?&0eV7vyNY@No3OqkO&L3FyBsdsq2__fOqk=|A<)p*J$_ z^Zsc7PVwt{V@+}1KTW`?{U7hG)rj{`3vlY62L_+7!~3TVIQ7r*zqTC6`=ksuGc&&F1l~VAz^Q%PuKwkDu>PsrC*v@)$?%E6`lk;4(*Rz<*eMf&^-uae z4r(tG`1*^}<_7DZ9<-koyySM{+6U{OI;@*r`+HR7{lf)0EBfaoYw9eXe@^sITF;c& zzR=G5pYA8=H}$_etyYcX`VGLT|IIEneiQG1Cg9XQ4F{Cj#`~WIIOUIGV8wF0|Ji_3 z`&7+8y&CU-4&c=Po^3z)G4Fpa;MD)RR47`Q`%mi`4|t^u?|RGop9k^N{Ve0KBxY~B zVEvEIm)JqIe&^dZ$WweeMBVGe`*UY4oLr~|6Ff3 zJ33hZF@Wdncw`dqKPKom0e{_YTlZl7ht5B1)x0-G#o}v&9PL-v9vm?~gyDvO{-cb4 z(4F@W7v!mbOillEH18iC;M70%rpzhL`-kqJ^q=}iSM&Jgynh&gQ~Qj#`)5<$KTN=> ze^ht$Ud;Q41vvGO0vQEX2kRd;@GgwMRXbS!p!K~2yx8isYXs{bbU%mU?E-(<)V-I3 z^$!Q)qd6qwps3cTV9@@7bDw@u)&!p4Cde7lKiqAart$pKU_VLuKl85+xBT)S@)X~S zd!Ib;%YWdM|HYO+D&m*_z$v~>#rw?J`ql%S@?W28X%)ZxKkT3Xmy7C-1kHc&x7a<-}O_EAL8?e4RUlI^K!@}zw>ibK>pWj(fV(m-!78J@70I) zX@7#}w+A@ocfTq?x)=eG$s#sB?j*9r#9Zwq*{ z$JHGdEWd5*q#ZW!hL3yrDp-Eg_x~uK4)Evfo7^mDe#3t^cxkgr{}U{~O*r>F5W227 z-@h1sk#^~k->JVA`JU&W9{El2+uk3pkD6gT}9U5G;Q^;H6xcUzz8x3Dy(la*m@zaR>r2Kn+H>N(%KiyI3H^rxX-{lqf z_-O!6`8TTDs{K6wOu#As)T(~EVEJbO@4R+xeV%_F*lz<~%oZBP^N-H==>AskWvb$Q zeeHrAokyF-jl0YHuPq?|)O8;p;`yaJCjF=UDtz+EF`i!r;FMnl#!Xtp^UDOB;5g=x2sL(E zy1=(iT$COxKMcS%zsWfCjC-&=Sbos`(a-zqCh`0*L5}W6?o66im7gzIkss9lBQHD4 z__aUesr{Eusdp}D`-3;Rw{9nIe+#a=P*&Ld#TDNEI`~KTo3>h7iO-_6|DU%_G@2>`U$z|Id*YAnTFq6 zF+tCOXk&AFj#uDxKb7P=U!8n_%iADF&li--I=z<5JAl)9x3T}aHh$0l0;l_}6$TD? z==c0DaJv7Kw!@PBJhHG)mm&S9^V88WaRd1M9RqMW-t|Hp#(=uXQxJS)_wIluoy@^pT8l1aC{`^%4AJ5&8b7I^%TB*plx!Hcu z30!kV+B2eekv6=)=y9FKqblF6`YIoj_n@B{!TYt1xl?|In{l1SyLw%JHWy&H2ji3# zyqTsx9o}QO0k|FbCtD7?3o_h^>oguEt~*{{$8ZnkK{t3y|7iACA%^RKYtBmls~;S@ zzc9n~xK8WExYJWg7Gbyp>j@+A{x#ez%5kjc%)s+a`8l;1!>zbZ>#dpL7b+KLxB=^7 zJ9wSH9q_UQ!*#z%yPd$F?EU-0ScbcCoz5HF3tIeMlHr!aQeJaTmi6>QT9#tC0sDD9 z@Tc|uY5zXMjkr$xnPW$XMVDr{1?MSd@alfrBB2b!bvQ4x0xxnis(o38+i{)xTTJ-< zb>$dtzG_MRD-!gTIlfcYZv`)=S*glZfQ#{h&Uf7#CC?7tz)q8| zRK_iOFi^^lTWul*ifC} zM&Q&wEjnEpQiI`U;FRB${`k3MO@>>6Q~wGZ-G1Q*z=c1S6|#O)3j7D(RkYXm5AnTI z@?Y3%0^bQ`4ZX6=km-G5gM9>_&Q~0BW&OGfh{xgI_SDMA z$*1-*fo}x=Swy8{wR8SHP#E1G^URTYE#S}JdG}DAw4D0semBj3cJQl>8mF$C>dzPP za6zvNJeyrTsvdX(*SKW8v|is|GJlYqE#EIi+c;ZEQ*zSZkjX>4QQqW#QMq<{3jHaGYi zr&?T1QgX)2Jz4TK7iBrSYQdUK!4vVa0yhAkxb3qh&47#gXnv>nhnT=C+jHb}W3qpJ zf=}z)SbTrY0{;D#ld_s8<>Z?J-XCHIUo)$lqeWs)KIJ>TKg31$bX_~4WkOCqo!8L& zLo}CU96m5?KieukC!hKUy+6bN{*2EAMH!;53z#pY<2R$r|CKQlt1+T5C{1B3#%t~ zNXyBm{Gs=UxWWH9an9b3sX6(SKlJ_(-5=85V^Jj*cJlp-{5u(6KI8Xw>HQ%_@IPMX zPBSIHf%#(xzecZrx^zj*$*26G_lLN^-?jJZzOD&5 z`IJBO{t(R->2F%vhwg6iIr)M4V*r0_zrAz2$K~V)=8qYC#{y;l9m>EK@Vkt=zCWK| z$chh-%l}rNcYOf;9+dG>ZOYIpQOtMxOc@87|8KwkG+zkvPT)r16#x9?RX@=Ctc5+M zN&bF&_R7EO?f9cXPXE2XmjQiNl)dXj77j&y!TfW8H}%zw-eEEf+5d`m4~(ablUm_` zzb?pAyKAloZ}(VS7xKdIlw|1#ty@oPcjs5e3smBX;L~$tW$vlxsp19dYp3krolIUV z-}{sdezllZzlHdEjpPRMX`V_2f5F09wbZfixWqR#l6e^$AOnDOr04+L;VJZ_MuY zD)5+{VS#qq!5@*wt>jFa%vpa@kY(BA<(iYw*8yQui)k+39^^8#WX zaoc6S<^{3Bo5$-1C)Qmk{uFU^fbU!{c{Gm2pZaO?``udceyXYLuRjj_ z>P^}|r1^sD%YuCg;0?Ka`ZeW(h-08XLRR$449F!zj$~5tH^oHoMI0TtF8&sA%v>eM zQyO&0&f{wW zPVu$h>6=XP74jC~lxKggc$`S%pTLcaWIsqiJX^mgaFy~);N}e3z7FUa{mZsY$`OIP zr^(;J&zAqKTplj(M7z?weW_F9N6L8Vp^(?z^Y^cJ>SrfZ4ELa319<9|i{FMY+ztDv z{?V11mgn`GAZJ1O`q`n1Y9{Z3ejD)ji#$sWWw;|iKD_ELqrw=TfcGr8z^gEH?C;?W zr~6Z6-%MrY8QebIegAR55xs09U++=;==qetzkGkEGEw3Ci1?WxPv39=sgSJdYKPWd$A^qaQ`{MUd;T<y%A2YV}+Mr@M z#m^3&Hes42gyBwHr}%k3-(6SDaEhNBytuU&mQx-H`!s+0=ldAb$2y)r^m|KMj7KZa z#{JIQKjECr4;s(EU7fozjj_J=gMMnCY2S8tsA6RV1#SdxMVT_@j5>tjc3h|UjeLH) z4EK-X?*#AV-l=c6f0lc2tF}JG?biS| zqTI3W&#l~kvd;|sXs#)H)y%(?^ZxO3*nZr}>$eB!54kzzSFYa)ob0RJrvF>6pXzsm zw|qpw%urUp9rFRnuT{>C^7HSJ^k0uM_EoR6FeYy$`+(o>^wGg^hP%-&X5eXs4|+7n zPu@TE;90@jI_RrS5#TBC3D!UD;LpA~`b1&k*=WAHv?hwrS7zYUKf^Cge#Pf2ZH&xMD|mZ`Sf}v$ z%3+ka9r)@W3U;S)NZ23S(jSlg{#pl)yCIj;fy`Ccz)<{-S(-B-=-aPR`dLD zBEClOHqEL&Aez~y2W|%5|9YjWxfxFD6$A3r@qR5EkB=R4l)op|9Sh_38EF28{LF}m zJA8bk_m9$gqN2yMm&aH0RQgTx^UQv2FNGv3d>_&NG=I_krzssKA5$j1!;O%S#XMMj zX1-b~hSU6I2G4PG#*z?*Td97uZ&Jzd0&0fS{ACBPW{2c_p$vE8I<0?>_Ss!447hi^ z$g!SsgFmp$*u-%7DZP>VCp~b@-!d*G7I*5U0nZl?tRE;|ueN?YD~#g>WS*EHzqRGS z1yqla*P*>ge!-}{jY62b4RVC{YNb8O*FzTI4wOYgo@u##DG%lEm{NQ9tMN%E-rk-7 z{mq8HpNrS8d*+`HlfQghkJs;lyaBxEI7e0lvp?gx+$U508}_WY#_P8P==&jQ|#J8#2$HzvF_hNQzpNQugN3hL*r%N zW{Wqg7*6A%1w8A9!w*6jZo_q&&ypJquC8V{jfW2Kx*Vw0E|lReTqpkq9N1YYjN!DN zCi_*1*A8?2v|iM`lzzk=pEZ~3H{d$0=PJ)zdsg#Kf27$V*8wK*D#sTr5CL4Q-zdL5 zBDas`<$sC{?NzSfQA3n6dD zI@AI^$!GJOm(!L4mvp7a~Q zJ5zp2S#Ce=C&>P=-JWvXeiP|Oc_g~}U*Rl%9@uRIo)&4n$MP%G2HXLBuHvinlwTtL zwtRB@r2T5{@WEqMvUwB&_dw17J^y}Iq#F0%1zh)9#$jCZf#oPKg*>$%#rH(!RWpx| z336n=ZK10Ux8Gs+-*0+G6-rk!`)rV>_^l~5>K>1u132x6cdvzXzw-9ey+Qi}?_RC@LEb*PP5$;L)|*z6+ixOy!oe-C&&ixucb;{=*R z<_pFV-CG%#L*M;&H=2znMqH=!;D1*So0*&8I?S_#pV(Br3_tI+LY~H>-(H3u;Ok#I za2n4~>{{N7uYb+JohaAFzATZ4)$hi2nol3K=+{vT+@Mfv43Fe`$b@-Ohj!EaEB!rL zeAK?YiT?LLc^qlqt_NS^-lLC6pa{N;d*HcRBKYsGb6N7m`}0LV)4`q;@D8=xGcZ4R z0=HrvlMXy)_T5DVfD6BLI7imMC+}z2@OLKos}FeoeJ?JjU*>@O9}2|>MW=ZEso8XI zr-HHmc8WOUxc>pZqf?=;b=sVKUEuu>@Rv5NzPgYXM<6meg~iTf8e$U9LA zTs)tW$^I7c(w>y(Opcbay%Ps)*~rF4rDw3jjiGY>KG*3%u45+-w3qd%)Nx7~2kPt1 zEK{@1^^J?bb)%)8-s6kMg$iNsN8m{T_=EMW28Kyk;nn#v691<%0)G!2Hn!ie(Zfg5 z`&7hbufA-1)5tE{j;W_U9nl%M_mzkK_V(`;T>~orYkj?Yjq3Nw=w74y5gGNRDP>$@ zRnR;3*ODHsB3015_NWu+y13x|JV-H3mH+eMp$gzhD693J@{iYV-$%qJ1@@)@Uo~*# zq;TLOJ~8+|m2`i&SMO1yNA~J7df@P3t$K~`H*yqsqTq4LfZjY)ZEdr5J4XXoYeM|v z^eF6b3sNEM(gP>EM>iTjlG~jIy+-h^=T6}i1;;2xBBFMm^t4|dg7b@eI zfU@3`ZrdmhLZ8zh*J+wsveey@<8x43z7y zJ|D^3SrI1fqj~jEwK}~cFQXaUli#Uwf?WC(iE!`AJ_PE@;Pe@Xt0&-We5_lOGFy%2)EdG7J3Slb(N` zD>f%TYpK+qfpIrBQpRb$Azo}@&%-r4qi`(yez6s+;)<9WLGWa4a z-u|G@>@2TaC(3fvr82z~82Chg$pD|)ZR0dubEQQ{`{YBjfK%T5``t&IRMvO6W46>w z_-s?ds>d9QcHkb52 z4&`9y)Z^hyK0Y9R%hJ0);_=I{$vjIU`HC|(as4T{o&@{MbDOnRv-qU}C;Pv=U2sPz z!!v->czG*1>K5PECy+eKa<^9Q*D(9F(b7K}Pq#csZyUjI>oz%0$AMSs@f%enaBqJN z3miWZ!0R_CxqKAzP=Sx&2aX>};1^oEaC9y+F=Z+Ef#XLi_<15nMn#+a`;*`YjvpD| zC*Bx*Dz`BwKXCj|MFxzfXretv|BxHy?+@`a_dP`Yj^w9amH-{bjq?N0V6G zdw(yvzm!i*j60O~^!>KuLqBe=OqFDT)B6t0(7S)<(qB~!r{_zoz)SzWNgu*+JK2Nz zX4$#A->Mnz1Ww~l>Q|pM31v8)SGvJFo9}eNFotWi(qChBxi21<*nXP^xHpf&jgZq- zl(-)Je1+P~k4RDYeFUGLi%wZ7$5SKtU2o1mE6%BSyak`0i;e}~0{)pw<|5*JJCIM$ zMQ7r7nC#$BJz^;%?sEn5>AC2H@p2w@fnRZWwQ12o=3TO%p6k}+mGKEb)puU*_?-I5 zetNFk0RD#Q$4cc1GVhZ8^jxo!=F`UJ)KB))bKN%ZH~-zaPhM?Keqg_Gg1stxLO5}5di{5HnO_)z{kXXyv={5J!q zy!l%_Yh^^LPuwSO1y0}pj9f8bN+iSWz-eAeyp_5;is4S+H1E%;*RWJBhP#2&yj{vs zc3L#UHTk6d)PF2*^7YTna6NFEcMm=v);15rjlgN%9aJ?{t!20wIL%8J>TPY7m*H06 zH1E9qX#L5UcepZkjf}f~h%76td--vr+cCc9;l1%!Iw9{;NPN@9_@(7`)hny;egy6Y z9;=dgz4ES=niDPS0#|ABOaGTEnlu*I%JdmC^~BR=D}XEY!1bR=`R6~5>$&9nxEX{S zfv3a17UgO+j9S{vcP8PjUu6c~KnQq0xgU>Ry7*RU?}#t+hxQd#j5Fz*SH$>@e~_pA z$bEg|7ImtSmhw*EB;PTnVwuoXflAyBoZ7crYu+r=|#s$-U^)JyJq;D zd9~m6zCySiIK_8qUUS81)fQ&Q*9p9l5b%Ct_MiA9SO5Di@qf`jDZcdm(3{CKK31g( zRN|WVq<<9OLd8F78NzTqaFT!TWkz2$!;QcxzD3PPPKCb1l?mU-yrKBUEPmdohH>u& z)UUKcp5ogu*Yr+Lf2c8za652{@3Y%4Tb`-&=`7$XCvb{ybmwxHI+pmP8_BzYQ+)r5 znSW)}jj6t~P|-g$1*QKK--b;-dH&~%TPI1s9(WUR!TZ^1>vC*f?kn@e|AoA1oxgwf zZKc}3EqUHSxEb=~pW?T!&&oz#EJwH%IQe(YZs~E}SdZ*e*@2UPRrkE^yK>ix43c*O zC;v)UzR)uF#x-75rxnKXfQO$5WaLP~1 z##8G;8J>Xsk`ufe`@>g-FGuzms)@_Eelz4~ewy0xVY^`Zt>BGHa(%}2+i^Vse*D!^U6K1|1nxw+X?_3D zaOS@oad89hu&d`;4Z{^nWd54LQE>s@oAl#-6Bk=rpY!_dz%@l>99}g3=NgZn9@n*>$T-ez z5c?NHM|{k{o2?z47K!#1`&2#hPJ?mO3f{zK-AhFIMma_HNAQgp z&lJc59vEWEnk6bqP87WIyen zjNsq6v$A=i_?&#QpY~4{@HfAx|8?QGoP4sM_D^>3_iW66ph#>^KG{$ECl~l(&zpx8 z)#l^}?w>Rzq`#l`D!!$d!k;hB9Rl}HUW!8OtMu4+7$9#(DR6N=E1CW6ZO8D`opKzG z?<=1#Nyc+zp;rzkg$W_{5&De@lCQ+|G^S7FrE{;u6K=@!i*|z_exd?b;K}>^@vSlA z29qvC zvN8^xKRT4k?KdKy%3t@FaQr53#YypSV2Wkg*QuYW~3=@;Rpt!01U^=mpEsQ>Eg8M{fpFa3vN zO)2>{X!xk4=KcCnJ%lB|J`2j5+qc#GotC6;7X)8DM5G{}bT?gE((4zNxXK7T6>0vT zeu(FO=#Za|blz`;XYn{@B0moCey%Tdp2tyLUdF+V{_w+GZ91<;lbG-Z%$Wc2Q*QeqfUVc2}Q^8w)GpQjjKOOnh z&Q@+{5m0^t@JysrTK_tV_XBkW>A&Nsv~%r<&E^=W&z0CZ968*=?upML#%Cl2r5duadOi355M^*@gRNVJQbc9R1AgNKY5`|9XF zZwrnOk8mTO+D*jt`@5OE$_t$8z3@-vD)G20DoVe}FYV~|ohk0Z?)*?jX+Hd&IG{tH zB%i(9YGJP(aWX>hr7E${QxD|ZBgBNgR^*etQxD93A1Vc|vIEy*Jec{;&-r;fb^)jH zqC)egUhafs1uo@ceECuSj?0;Ud%!kcxFh@cb?yG4FdZ&)XsIMk;WzuE=123w~Td88>Qo zYMlEDz9`34J`flAMn$ATt(S2iIZE9v_2$`Qc88xXVj?v zqedl;Y|Ea&@YPq&^Bi{Q`S(eIyiN10fAqiU>)-Fc^m(B#+m&#*TfN5q@kH2H6!uX{ zb>e%ELeik&eUnUmMkWpFJILB+c+#lK;Bq?+Rb;&Cb@^_^z8$r5^wRi2Y0fw@I>|aZ zsb%6w-xomXK^Cqr1^W8+Ec*QN)@QUIs8XDj^+o&b`CHVC33Ez=L_4SbmJG;m+Pi+P zlHryh`K~W!ZRPUXs?rbI4+$$$?>v`}15WpwpUA=zRgeAA{d?woc0Ub zuedu=#qey{?EvrTtSNlIR;5Kg?I$!`QMM+xF9SH;uW!0JBAeTn4V?DltMA=*h1;jC zCjF;zbl-+=`*8cxARh(h(tMZtctj<Q|qXcDU{Gz9$`gz4!U2xt;gvU^m&H4Sv^8Zw$)qyiWl>*`u!^<1_u< z5p8bgect2J9^#w9Pdqu=uF-|sAAC-p0)F)cUzN?}oIJ`6{q!7U8u)kC_KyrcCl~WU z0`42>Ih#!I6~4ZyF2{RHO%dYMfoZR-c?(lHqBCzj$>4JN0Q1 zf2~3KP5zBM^-n6dKO1`Ez>DfSPaVzl)BHs8+kbd>IImxN4k#J&%ZL5>G1u=vz82+V z&-u1zB&(k^;N)M$b%WbPF+2k}jqedJi_B9q+zdP$Y22z$^TjaxwY8=HH2%M}_V)f* zhNq<>e&CJORvVfJxNkhnc@BuiXES)4e!u@~Ui1?MF2N5TpOeAgzP(tve5u5gso)2X z&#B;VT)$nJ-w`sNLQ-;4suq5RqfjsTi zq~UMQ7tb+ykT2v#zozjfp+;^0?|DwvxOOMpB2bBI)8+HXn!3`TAN~y68R4rx!i}Tl zz9fxnOH%i34P&?oa#W79*5i3fhFgJC`CSwGcME5@9XO3^ z2JrWH+FLZY=X+DI?nr1X*JT#)g3S5*k>{0Z_-Dpp}yQ_u?OKoA6;UfC6(zD_GJd03#BcS{Y}XDbpPkR z{n$ZC!+jeue$~GAn6v+)Z6xEd|NATTlpn45Sr9~f&7LXsYN5aHsQ6+^zqG`YSD>Fm zUNg7Jk2Gfqc^mR++&xwM4TweN@1>R_T z>E?VtnV#z*{PMuYZ8)xLEaPTGdS~SvUu%|^s6Ty$K>c<0HlNSsEs(PzJu~T{J&MU2 zgX*`#cV`0LxM{>8_f|dy!A|)A?SlzoS|EF-#6@Kkq+FHBkJ8{pyO+eq9sk z=dOrFAJgyFdHpDW8<8e&yPO=OgCR%+Ur{bF9v1MIzB|}L`{*R)?;ofaJ9rJ!lz;L4 zY8`Ml@U11r+xUL98|~i<{8WLDZqt6Xm@m?{OaH08D4I$?^W0pqkM=6LJ!bT09eBx~ zjA)E-`o{wk@;%$6-jiE9E~hgezdx{t@E(oK>!@7{oSu`hL(hik+Qz)SP=6+Q$I;gw z>IXue`m+b}_iO7?xPBwzMe>77-2Npuc}+7JhYe+GM{{{vcar?7PhKg)bTUGI`yr=8 zydNFkaxfftZtcYie(LJ=m*{twQkz_l1-BPF_;)H)dqjKZ#24iofV+_U#%ySy;%RSTTPbNvokzm*#uY|Z<-333#lvFEQJ=KVPx z?*+4hH`ADZEbp(17`gr-`9h;Uj^g!Whnx%P?AZe!^YbI~O4+}%(XP*w>ED63pR6GJ zqV}|&#O?P0*EE;@C*54%nx8+Zi%I=t-$~E%k$k)`K+c48^|+@lswaQ_K))4u>q~!s zL;XzP)c&dc?#g@cUEcm&kfZwB`Ly*FUVk3o-s;lM!SC%G!|RXqYf%5IXJ!1u^=n#4 zzp4Ec+y3${Z$I>28JdqQpXIyC>&F!|o=#s>OwZ$Eg?@^k@}JQqxV#Ct9qEhox9W2H z49IsOy-}=i9QU8jJ!rlc>@wj2jz?{^^UqG8NwwdGKXj|8p=G+8I~< zo2bpXzc93v@uBBzAN{)Ul{!mzR&*hse3%J1-Cxw1>HF^FgWX+#E3Lp6hz#F#a#q17 zt;;C==iXvGwgac}*l<$Tqh^{;rIQTNo|5xQd5Xu3k&$*D z55>FEACkYfxc742AM|*xhUAT>Q!a6N9psHjTd1bb=lz}LXAAJcjSiRK{oRIqs*i8~ ze%K*bs*NgIv;5|*bQ78{9--3Kvf7CfJWL92=(|2eoz7IYt@R-Nf8C3o| z?L9H9esbP3W<`IVQsw0P5zsH@oA{d2e+A|vFZ6Xk?=j~x-$Vw_H;UFWK9@gkSdPXq z1ulR5q0azb`%?|4^YMb#UlhOT=jXKGK+}qes_@m5_NAJ<@%k# zy-4RA-uVUhUlA|;O2zYm57oc1(}TX;KR5JJ{XgmbK^-1HCvY#)hTXaq;r?0N zf#t8CRb@UeU)NT~hve0h(%$3pRR2css=EhF;PJ5_pX$HC*av5MeCT->8+a!+uHV7q z<3zp%=QY+DCkj(P^!E?oZlt!F2fOk9XCwcCFI^a0iO-j5cu$-T^|Ug4xRJ+K@t*Ww zhctOYtJAce5c3s{FE;cqBX~P() zFQwv>bp;u2LO#tWM@%Q@7XmKc$7RQOO!JiuF{ zxQK=#EK|V`9>>$czw>UJWAtnbNr||6urA65ui>CFe-{Hm;8|E#>f6cq6m{8Z&~~uE z?ZD%K&*(I(U2!IF#eGEr@VN~RH!Hz#8mHs1kM!h0?fZP3ONE>R_y=c84Cd`L9XQRi zW6G%NuzjMObysEI=9jppRXx`yGkr`?@qZC7b$jX8|KD|&9&*9!E(O*Fga@yyk|AdV z@4wbf4)B84O=-xdcJ^QErVQ|c*G<{THzN&RH|fwW$^PJVkG6x1R~*vdb&nbOR3E|X z9$MFs{-AY@$^rTR*Sdn_`MQGlmkj9ne~n9N;AJBX9+&hVNPqupT%vJ>>VV?pXI zH6kfbkUq|L!%iFc7g7elp!){0f%Bc%S95{CY=5n6+UMi^;Qc-?_&+Mw+|F&jwv~|a z)pV3`i0J(JN}6tj|Hc_|KBoG8V0>7L*RKU~RDaG|?ZSEexr5{zf8Dn!mv=&*;@f5I zCq{~|DBpQZ+UEwZp6_eJ5s1IQy~sCuB(GkheFs$xr~N|3N7BEyI`w!R$#5O=4S!1c zCUuj4i30A6f20lND-04hf?sve)l0N)P~Z~w#DQ-CuURSMhG?_{UY|DDZ3pjZn{A8f zzL)fIz5@H2F7TBFbo+w$lLbGd{=r}Q&ZPUaZY2Hw`h^{uPBK0}ef{oAzMmUkQuv!@`2cCQB+X3r$Gu9(yU-xnKl-xce zLcUM8|N1Lm?-cyk z9}f?3x?ioi`}#+Go#>hpI9~lWzQKAv-WY=L7bU0k3c$O{cu_nRC)@tc+q(%k-LHSU z_UjLM`5NF>q*G5GxzF!kXuP!pZxu6t8gI{r&jao6v3C4^Zl4EoWS?&D@QvKQEZ}5c z+vk@9&PQCpHD>AOFN3cP;{C;de5&t%E9$TC--l!&{wDAif0MqH&fCQO5B>hZiTTX} zz7_l*W_aPi!Mll?91)Af|k{ZRaG*54D)&#RriB<_J+{;%$QK=Bvje_Rt8N4n3+0x!zB z^(OUEQMR~*eZ~)E{Ky~8$1*Mw_uUr`l;zn_?t}V|JMr<;0zTQRGxs`4_W1l!X5EtZ ztpDPlqeADaZ|%BA=eY0l9)a^H-E^wt6 zcrB6PyLN6|SK`35-Ton1ly7++Sbm$fW&YhgDDP>(73J%?OMj{SjVssvkmv4+=Y$)9 zQ~Bo16?2-5Zm|-$(gK{G7kay2$DO|)c<2wcPrr)dL(j{tFVL`_cn>7xRhC%!zC0)N zd}8eFiD9@K`KH0L9?GuV)h3qV^j$2Huiy5&Yh2!o_f(VoG{@Huqquwz>AxNNd-TYg z#_dx8HzKWgYsYL}z6JTDzucH*d-E{;_A&CjFWx2F*^y=$clmhfguJ_l^l#w6CIS2R zZr~QQzxkugt@wE5B^>WBiT|h6PBkmv23*lo`q|;4y_EQU0L7o;X9O>$*hgRU`00>O z{LtUsg_umM;7NlKD_jYmnZOAA8-gFl&P-d z@pD6-%8%-;E5q&c0w+7~*Kfa-m#>%<*#CNG{}`}d(OClPx9#ipMiuKH3gAYh%5uG@ zar>Pp-vWGQ+X)?b|H?x7`ID;;ZF1qMIY&Bop&~rE5LBebQvGAZ{VIsMYw%B$Qh9?xm`AmzWd;}5Be>@ z)1E)ATZrlRV*IuNe}9dBdSQk;kx%!(O&(90T!i6PjLUBD?hh?etSH01$oCAv{P1a! zzlt$j@rm@C?mt|o`hFzd=aDo1VZA}WleyTpPC|tB4Q?1J^%|k)WRvP6=zYz?e>xwr z06$zNc3~uww;|sJJsppE7SVf_#d?L-Z#wXtNVSJXepuWh?Vx`-Uqf*Lziqy|6HCA^ z#*efi{+>b7k1X*28Dq&?(nw61`t(OCz^D02*H^~x`k*n#OBn+B!hdUm)N2CoVISpR zZ-FOp8}ey>dpBlfOlgMG`he=k*;Cm+S|`g9^0Yp1Lr;|@P4?10fxx}UHw~9|v_E+E z>sTgF;~U9$uB5&eAW!Q9$e+Ib>(eMEZ|o=i&l)E6f3Yw!AGc2j+=BGr#%gw6z76?g z-|(9^4)XJJFU_wwk9oa%-EV4Ez7z6pqz`YMJVX0r!hiCQ%AY#2#V+ojF{u2~6_!rq z`W5}9e>$Ws+bJe-`;Eva`)i$i_X4+{#&3#G?}hJ;0w+7yJ^P_P zFQ5D){euc6+~)d?82_mK_}=gR4fl`qDh5bD|6Nz73zzqzd>!yY|1Lhx?K2{u{4W!E zdlk3O8&v*~4xZP%{a7GxLwfVeenuWY@{h_NUG+xAfbvm)H2+O__+ul{`x%%x8UVd{V5>-z%}v*9v>s*sr(t2vQKdPEWjzwjcOK5=jH1#FH!xh z>%4TQinVVWdTt=3m6reU}RxCQt>#h%qGz;T*iVPE0lSqr#*Hpn@V?)~g| zzJg5NOZ^}C>n5l67h<>qxEJ_}SH~Xn{WZlP={Mb<-b~nYk?*fLF@Ea6t3PYOrZR8F zXJyvQ!28Fc zf!7fkzUzMPv8Eb7-tZsIit$Y|LXNve%v-k4U-ipv{`Er7;Qeif^Z8dXSo&{;o_vNg zw{n|*v#hcl9r%`-mak(iev@+k5%VuS51;|x2>$lb$7j;IkOchmX|%k*rTNqf{;>_+ zYUMQ&Q>MaSPolKL30~@ZdFJE;&xhy4s~$vO8DBnseXwi|@u!fd{SzI&(>riO6J3Nw zk_GO?eWqrJjLTDfpK~gP8}S^50r-u$8k$Jp!k;YIr5h#fG=UfM!IflMcgxb`xiiJf zGE(xb;O|pyo0i8&Oqu%qhkhq`5$|37G(UKL9QkxkdGgw`dK!jj0jKsp=)$E&1sG22 z4U#|bVUzUeH|;%Vy8E_^)CZZbH5#N&3@$#s>d)Cxi$7_~ZN9B)=qk(oQZ< z`w=AnJnqG5{(OcD`gPDhyVJ;O+&(*S57Ix*kDDCJ?8^$WuVcooS9A_1>tFgs{*PbP zs+^k1YlcbOfV5!IzJu~IoaQSkzu^5sKXd{_mA{iQO@?a4vI1Li86jBq+gU-beP*`MLya8;eh#7c==R+ zR@hfOwplM89~b1Q{MXL5R&JjMIK}ztpsCe(`Ly1k`26u;-6R!jzgdviSfw9N7IhlW z?Xv?n03WC<(TcZ!T5phlzf`&UkjLKyIV;j*v-%y($I91`f55+s?AI_q!wraw3;6rz zzFMtexCiaq1H9_GUhnhg$LM~Z>?^*r(OPa_7UVP|r2nH=6q*z8d>8Z^fREdcm$mit$;@FK*1^bbsptZ{oup zg^NLt7;D8P>@kAx0q^efrH^&2JjF=qrvmfU;%k*xlx4VUv>eBE&~xGR+=l#oQ3rV= z(gmjmt}O?7VK2>ZHtfS&!0UW3dVG1E-^`qUa$67B!2kJ?YEuPG4%Po3!4E#qaDlH| zz3fWGK)U}NCipxp3$^H)Woomt_D5a4o>yy#_2KG;qfB52` z^ZQ9Nh= zIc1vlStxW4(|v=nJgtZ4Dq8-jdR=Q2;dbD(9=`hW)#kBJ$9@f5=>ksY zIo}N)kk(vx|9iseJcr7!(5FeW3)L3qC;eGL<0XUuK3~T(l$LSYKs{vOTpg(87`J+u*zF$cDHCE_x+-mGqn}oD%4|e2dO_ud= zxA>B{Xol1LMDj!3gI9BTT0fEe!<8fQ^8MN@=r>G}`l}RO*oNEZ0j?P%<8boJ4WoGZ z2IP}|!>iO4G0Z+X&oT9p`roN|ZV*48wnE+xe0+&wCHeWZo%925vi^RoN`}YZUtGW` zzF!R)?~Y{Un}BVfB6%)DkRBNFPeUFb z6Y@!Zw581{9v_!<$h zL3|(Y+}(%ASCcILqxcS(cWVUqpWD6N*aZ#!@g((TVG2cFm9{=)=(UP9^K+&=P;)>r8R=0E2C zYsR7ekuDjc9n9@FA)ov!I^wqzxz<0*FZ*-#4|x3Skf-t&Wj1hd`&^_S^}o5S@ii}> z&U2{$Eq**AhWEcL$W#6HP92z!o|hEky9c;ty!3OW>XTJ}^Yb7pa1Zc$o$l|; z&-y>D|HwX1a^9xgzAVUTK9&9#E4CsJKQGEc`!oPII{p~L&x>5B7ZdPWUCaE=&x5SU zr}LZD^|KvjHpZR$ZtvBdA zr%v6(nh{nx!20VSdNmWI{}bJ|cU26h^Be>4PfRPSL^9ljeA85#Uq)s|0T=5PI?u@> z|G@vDUzOU$EEwpKaK3A@)Mp3(;E=4jbWTN5Vm)X={H@@-!GETAWfV6OQ>KFN!F)~q zB@6uIpH}I_d*}J(j}O*Iy3b^M{<-(w$dcd*+=P6Z-!#4ZDd}8D;IuxV_5YB@L(cR4 zPFf$>p+|Ax$y~ml?LvOmG#QVLzZ74<_oHe2C;5}h=RM@|IqL(+pPM&+GT(33Oq71v zfwzBjFoN5ch4KyHJ%7~n2`}G-e6p|5x@V91ez*($hy3qRvTn~vos6=GkCn+snyZog)d^q=IT%iL9R`)U5B_&hv$ z`fVN`Q;>Y6E@w`1`>epp&Xh-wy7BUJ>JRaMVf|$`*RR3&Nb#Gw`OBBwKho<#IbW1r zqU7=}vJa^%@543RK8-EV|Hei3tmgK)g3A9mX-Po)F+kpgv~Z^O3XdQ8mxc28t~mBy zK>4T_n*VHXeS4JqXNO)F(pBAj-{)lQ$Af&Tzwi6s{*jkY^+)mP-m7g4kB??DwSW0M z(t-wqKjHQnfK!~uR$tJJmrwI6)lcTgQ(MBBeJ03Tk&dfUDd0RS3-;TAZ~xQu9&i6S z^DEj%!ACb&^Zx6CoCj&;Pp@9&=S5bE5Ad50W~upksU7vAnIhw0NT}P3p9dL$8-QEB zEH;#%2j$GKurJ|A@%!996XdK&i$t}!!_SLcRR6$x)ZcKT0E?do-__owVLiOqc%eYqa+W-_O<|-#c6S({ucSFQVCc zhsJY~zxVXVLR_BK8zkTBto?$D$=jgc3H|+dFaI;ZKEjdC|J}Tsm+ua;Z%W5ux)`RP z)*Ix1SgX{okqq}jUNJ-Z|HZGRUdi4l+ZXxg1TTK|%1YcnvY-4LJ}kQ&*KdSg3+dl7 zvnaRUhJ2FWaj9_zx1Z)KichbLEvNGMxP#<}?;H0!x6ccl?2LaqX(KN`$3Mj1y*T1C zuAkN$6u+s*PCw%QkzQkpj9<-V&(gWP4*3?O^$*x0xqUX|lmFjm4(!V9qxA-r-@8zW z>%9FqA@4@IWpl48JbvUKm49PLlh*;|qh4vf(P_3hf%~VJDgDwRjaZR4p#2$5N>*xKv{nL7b{HwpY$XFhK9psEiZ(aSX1V1nG!fy-kcTY9m z#LtTqz-_>LA2)x^&x4$3zfRz<`=77E&x2^aLH2!dd+>N}pBr*sq>)*;pahKjL#PE>Rww^x-jMeF~8VpzQ+Bk z4ZN0dj;VAmM6-sdPYw7^@VcA+?arSU^dR4e`KnKa7iHM5T^M#DZ?-o->IxiCT=Bx*B-)sP{Qtbn0%j(EdndY`0Fo7SDr$bCRO(;M3Ji`Y5 zghyW$D<4SrpXUUhX9$Wo=g`1D7v#N21uo8Wvf1ChxGFQ1@;#d$34-r>Xx+E^e2wMj z#Q%MMMCs?Cec*k%bl&3a_Iiyn)Q^z&;>JV1weCiDvELmg6yp;1rUjkLB!e#~{1`o5WbVRCT!;`d3x<;!v-6seHQMrxiV?~C+vWjwea zzPN@NkuT(hUm5U=zB6FDD4(a6`okm56Xf|9eYY^Htb86wU2dL3WfiP9mxx2!r;=|h zE5AeUM0suE)V*olMiPRrzaj0l-jb;Y{L%~VmY{uC&i9^^_F1ONauoBVpC2#2S6Xc( zrc6bD^uiwlcn|+n9i;c>3fzKx8XtOB)@taz&cZ$|e(z|%Aj`FZf3|h)0lB?THyQ6| zcEe65_%|M%*_7M+bm@K0cJMvmN1Sc>xp<#0uRmc=aJy01rT-JZdcQ_)@6)CF4b&5% zup!O{$cr{7E(`wVe9>-_kuNwtJEF`j(JrXJMal1wRJIp>9r-`>w>0Qm(_>S`D4$MV zo@kfZLH#Y0m9JNX$0o$c_EJC?naDuZV93@`b$c-%vpMN4((o7iay)_n@@%1N%M6 z$2FDXXIv02%A?C?hsp$87ZnRl)$8SVy7 z?Q^Z+y_ey@Mf+6OknyGXdBHEae{szS9a-|GJPUBe*V50!&3=uc{Trb#INk>ECR$!= zM86D*cgT2R0{?uCy1hidL-g5xc4(cX=)%LaKW$A!PC9SXi^@9D^w^5Id*-SHmn ze`I~6;63_L|9HA7=|x6@?7KueiSH%(^nG0QZ8<(4>l-;W%HpTx{3H13JtbeiOzMwY zAmcZ$$+NL^en$d=pV>q5>HD||;Gcf@;*V$}F=Z zr3n2Le=p*12EWm$ZCh!7lJjZaQbT_V_!pbhzMac^;6wU#8u&YUyge~^-V)Gvqcz8d_>(L(u0{^V|v${_Yw0H(w zMf-1buDPgUb#s_Sl7;;V4jC`9zi)-l&nOw50-VOVB_-zf4`+BPa2n?-XTQ6N_WAtr z22S70PRHK~DJ}b}Y>I$O@b$oH-Ie1=V~GcNDPL;j%O0fePP zj`pSZ=P6&VXzNOCgbzOXuuR~zFWuqq4_ZAby43&vGofF-MEWxbPA|%PKc3QNp`N88+Ciu~5H~Zz)hw_8RBkfWduf(_k-{jMV z@`KkI@!;#nE!F2&2d+oOyhr1as9U=H>pW@~kf(Vs6@PQSnD^Ys7dpf^XT~^3_g@KD zNSGzOqkI&I+r-o z{fh(lF&6NzHSPH@CYLx;+%v(qgFoQuu|cu9#F6~vaS?G;K+cVn;+TcMIbXz4y{}Cl+2Hq3=!*uIQlBgS>x0oreG`ZE z=js$(p9A_XjXb<*T+4obvHwe7pMHtfr2g!qs=iXVzD($AaCqV$m-g26j~7B;4D6wl z>>Sm9sP99ifeN|4xNl_Kmgbw=x7y|heT16-%f7__hrcP%_ecCB-z)DIjUs)qu#Zx* zGx3wbKKllZ;SuEaWkBDWJ$cp*-I?JbeR-je(meRPZ=&x*<|F$IVxM~rh@XCi^mo^y zrIp8Yy|#q(kv){=#4kyFKz8^*UcubHWaw*r|L=jfdTB3_zCy5vQhLYKNMC)7@qLW8 z^o@GFs7L6O^4p*nqCd=4WDzF^pbs)lAR;_kFxq)=V1)+Tj!L1H@VU(BkJ(4 zR-w;Vo=P!M&JV^%a{Pa|cgyQAr>_M7cYPyqE98eqt-YsYxMxzJeC(wvh5&iUWoJqK zPp1F0C_o;#_rAnE|8Bb%&h%#iPYaXlfw8J-0^d5w(o*Mqy(&%0I&P4 zM(^ZfxC=Oa_fb1~S8ZNDR>;wJL+3s|SeVz39XNgWvq|Zt@9_F@0jKYN&WJ8Oo!5^C zxOIWFe?_^VwuX+6#fYZ8v`8`8DUOy(_v=08G z&iShnv;cdw;}x!$yI6XZ#M+ochk zl?=B6r}lYfd*y-Q47UfB-}t+I6(WH9)*CtR)3iO4R+YG zf0?cNKguINdv|fJ4=#_}my#{x;DY|9Ra=)-X8m_Oyx_$b-TrSlc>eld7Z{I5Z5ls| z0M5&!@rzPL^Y@B{=>p5+e6r63{i9A_E1#Qv2H-ZNOBx@FRWbWq$fx)%I6mWSWG?oZ z{*m!Wm@4mEmQ8x{zEY#4rr}S8ztldmpx4lK#+Y#M1g={j7>|b|=fy+-=l;=rK;P$T zSGmjNFynv6gY2_F|G0nqRnE;mBXB!X&A8^rRLnj%@+ls-3e6Z3$#C*7dy|ZVq3Vov zN}Y^@zx}5M`FFn4-f)KNfRlWQQgfF?Fx&{7$}iI7!T=R;9-s6mIp1b)ly+QR`c9P6 z5LzGfy)hf~ZW-QlUO0HXzFfd#F1Z|c(ndGf!^{XX}@8J-24mO^xvqGF;oSd*N+$SX*eGoG4$=zN=s;ap?J8Ux68Qkg~P!U z?Zu0HipQR9>%NF!xMG9!m*hX*YpbGSxDGhQqjNFk%t+wE-UN)hM)1h)PdgqR9t9o^ zI)ZP(yk#f5AXomf>L)eg!1-pZ0}bHY!7tZ(bn|FqU_AWxOqTPz3-#;#dtU&(%N0{_Id%c{JJ zP<{s1^&XlBz^^y8=g52*=XreGSm)a@pSi$KxLCYre$11NfRv(%`HR{@`F6W( zZ#wV|;CC+mU{En@C|?i00(=Yj&Fe?C*IGjPskm=dzn1l82Y-Ew`UQ)dLiuL!Q*eLg z27f@WKR1>zhVs?mr;nHSOIhH%H&^xjt|OG6hW!I0^y{|B_{`j$QlykFl%D{;27D9v zpFHe4<}FPqUkg61|83xVGH+ZetqA3(WB-QEZ(ZPb51ZJmOqPG|g_^(rTq`+jD4RTi+k8Xb+lKv{T zN`F5tUvft!TPQyjd}==i@GE{cwQpr>C|?hL8uVL;-`4P#-V(}JkHq~J_;&F7Jx`xj z#T3fVz<0i>{kXxex-g<=RbwbW4SZ@pS>W%EuGy-ZA(Zb3;_J4__{3h?HLstqJ_QyFSb#J|Gj^euDSSZQ$?xu+GbxLHoU8e>*v7f7=DV!gq=J-;s*=VV-Nz zd3TktG+C+-k4UZ#{8O3kUUi`cKj+hJm;TYXoN(Zzg2}6lz>U~1s{B>wFO=yy`c*mm zS->X@9b^x4zrk%Jk9oE6lOx@g40i&j^~*O?exDf5a5r$;51YDf`J)Jidx6t_*pn8s z`>7bN*dhI+^>F0z-*C>5Hkc40i*k{jlhtG_CS5+zXuc8;Z?)>CDS;3*w{LDdXTh zHlb}kR)0F=Q~kdFXG(T{hT9-d`)LK&Twl%W&jNW`KmOF`P+?wwHsG{hR_SuX2fY5A zRQ^iYKGlicf8zD$22T5B@3gg);q~VQPWxqBfB16{uRq22(r?-?dv?6@NM3(B;Ivc>NjS zpBubQFNPP@u=>$$ka45>t2}>kDPBKb$SHQoI5cWnZ+ZbHpR=Eh{#)aZIj?#D^^ktZ zUq5`fIoEGNz5;e$KKx)^KGyzhz{&o+zx-;>&u}Mj8qf0_HE-82Tu1UqKP=YeY(Zwf z7x}bbsHk*MUx?ufYX51{|6#_|(}jWi)`OA3>r)+gyKU-eMKF$vu~uAyAG|&_g5UW< zjf|qHa@><_$q!ziTESobo*c># zUY{y{ka4ke{-{ccgiwC)`qTja%Tg16D`^hp2d_^p;BV00oLMS9lpnl4wS%8pD81}k zaiRR+^{E^Dk5}KGU0NT?4_=>Ufo~eNW=a`tC_i|8s{2vKr(+SrJe@j}AG|&_fxmmY zW=GlVkoi9{cztREf8p8smU5Y){NVMe3;dI{N)Iic5y}rmQe(?I#3jXBr=N?pcgz|&er%v$qzTIP;J|&bN zygv1S->&wMAytw?`N8W`#UANz+|VieswRZ;gV(19@H-SXU8-gdh|4 z_)vcE`qU17J@0RsHR3|~!Ru2u_y?Chd|p!@$`4+jW`XaRz3V_NZ74r@eX9FO#%J-; zV-F1KK)!gcgVv{fpI@;>Hny&nRex5|b-nwRtSm~u4SB9)1Cv-W4{7tOotPE~b9FkFH6 zXU2hd=UR3<{<}&u@{RZ8{A>QLy_25L7yAquDBpnR@{_5&Pv>ZIc`iT7u~h1z=OrEB zUx;h_z1kQUccGu2`_IDj|LNd=6SL1Hem}+IEBK_}1AaF6@!H3AVsxQ=((eLazgNbq zaI4$(Vl|=s;C5pMKXG~90peK$ZjZRHap1m&@>9U~QAPbnBy^MU$Q+H-Q+%Mn#3kx4 z1AJPSRUf>pU6{oW`|)hx6!-P(cMYTG*!=bHmi|!txU#)XFEx{o15WF<%a`t~k7l?T zIJKYmmzSL%!|-I_w60lIxzom2hC6`Mx+U@G3wxe7xKi`J+=pJOX!Wkbcm0|)cH)p> z=NF6r`|JPHy;P})KNER4^6Gm3V=LS~dcLuC-5EbBt&;4=gY3K2F7Zq_!?pXRev(&i z-}qYu!{dOHecu&Qf23kKjX%z9a(}Snx<*x%wm0P`L!Ry{b}X*cAe`Y2;1s_~rRz11 zU^sm*HVwSrp7mLxVmOsg&x7vKt|-dO&xRcJkNAtdC-U;OzexY7eINgQ>jPeX2IS+w zE3~T3<49J%Vv+2ZUA!0;X1J~MFYzjp@|yUy*) zhF!_v)#&OdqK19qJ|Y9{(~LMfz&k&E`n71ZGX*ZekE8xXDfrnHM{lQbhxnrXr=kC6 zg7<3Ir#tdmB*R~R(EOx5Amg$7_JrE>zA4ft_%wge{1gZN{z>`H=Qjq9?}AVB2hC3j z;AgEhMTp<0hLLh#%JtLy98@lpj1lWrKfi&+TR6 znKN#WSl0y4Pr_U=Z>3>g(I1rYG9wkZZylqwvcCmCD`=k6d*3{t%72GdL@4lG)Si-R zm$QfY{1BIjPw?-s+$g71^><;;zgA@9uRvg+`l+DW%@zs1J$05r1u=0KV zAS`>RJXfK4FixY@*Dxk|g?&C;sY{oB(eL1%Uw*kawOfIP0vB=57$)WEcOCIqr*&*_ z>1(A@Y55ee)2={oAkeP+SffIeEpJNf}c4Y{x6Z` z7{D*te#t|Xj}wkK0S-QyjW{9BOfqRj5={I*x6v`L4)h_QBs9eK|f*Yt@QJw<7$4tgKfZ=x;pYJS{tL9do z2Dl07pg!|zs+qq=#Dm(u4ZP%)rc=@A-(Ab=T{=kA?dc-rV)Xs&B7^i~U zzsUDL4~}v@kk`?9&mYnsu1EA+E%K$j@7zCC-ha{Wz|+^szo$2wnaE{{9}m8Ln6%#v zeGd;8t)&zscKQ5_(g*2J0e^YjFE`K_Ln5M|8-n_ITA;m=!S>n@$#vPgX9sSi{zdvk zoP+IEAC_^M^6l!bs$A+N*xoqs&nW&*jU>fLMZE;uDbDu5ST~c4|VrG{>a>@eWzw+gPT?{t~X(^uu-1W88^YgS>)#-OuLOugH z)!WjR*`KK1$Va5-mHi_H=blM@UR2@do?4Iei|$YEd_Df#FyDS5l^+M3?w`6;x%8Hj z;b!1;|I(vLVs<#glYx_eW2#m>7r}4`aJs*&sor`;1ze1e9z4gK4L{SsFR`>up~wVj zC;cn|2tZdXk9UnN)2!57D@@Za*1HW61 zW=YX;p?vxs6zNX@ziIT@T`~Gle(?I-0e*M;ghjF1P=4^fW;*x_okcF>Q3vwHxaP#T zM!yrw246%(v?l|`6FMi{H1mZu%qHW-+jIPJ8K>>5tCr>WlL^SD_H?_!(EI#;G6guT zBir?C`Y?j&PX$in%$4ZwHB}7PqCV*yG_jlWVOZ)L`!XR<=b-ocOc&oBS&@ z=H{7jhUO4f$l&&u2EMiVlU3^EK)$FieWqM5W`g&-GwgV@k0&l(pBC)jF0>4ZR9fHQ zaVKTGsQ*`OTjgjt!_B}+zSEZIPx<~)GH|NT+n*&B=le$)D5)~^IKfP zzBI^FdzwD=n_1xu*TXNW??G!1B=P#n4l3U&*E{if!zk3Nu-Epld|wTB4o7O8ge^P*}PfNd5%io>E{fR?9#lP0R*a~XqFFnU? z%_HRpJuUkI9}kT99y2}na47Ts+Ay~as)!fKJ5bJ)zqjvIGCXJh75LuP7d_z&&pq+YDu!#%NV`csc~}EuB*Rnj`zXS{ADh)E+@tVc!hSR4Q^0$8 zrQ=T#3{MWyZ|!_6Ld9?wexF79M|97M2=~6xp9Xn5cpo2qdv658GlKMIPp(&41ze0T zX2_-C`C@v$Casw6x5$9j?Y}RMGQp2*=+$P(_)NK?TO5@o?V^8${&+n9=Kwz*{8ulE z{j7!^oUg<4Epgx{gMYc_m7k*#7vhWfYNpEZAq(eVt?Q2ckjFm*^0fZgIPg#=k3aR3 zZ18H;oB4{zUo%bWr}*o8MHlD#wP&UOaY(CO3SSn<>W}1Uz9=~E;8$GU47p^apDTOM ziemB(@E3Y$@ABX*tWc0rT@GI}kO3!Bx z*Gf3S20{&RLT=x;=JB}l)0N%|%gaM7Qr|D}RQ z&yy|G?S4Pftq8aTKXW+dFYwbze^=w>DCi|2-k-d$<^Eiguss)*%s%}E=^wS{uzBBh z;r>y7iU;raDg(E0|ERx`|8w@wD9-h#K#t<~g`-17u0H{ID$;MR&iaMLC#OGTlfU4# z%Ad7K9po=>-_%|+N&j^HThUI6j7$Ze_S5M+M|)AmV?_M0S~2!OzKCZ!+FLw$@x@=Q z)v)$T&y~@9{vvwR$6?ST`)2(~wVbZ!-1q({P4o04Moz9~yp)V0dRh9!2!F_5TAyF} zbkxsb&?E2!l#_z=%$S+|dH+pCKDCdD*Q@X1{g>j94&M8vJl|9Q74=8sWgPHKq$$-K zxTAvn5&ZO#vj4b7$#t^&vW!E_k3VbGh!giO8S#t*Z}_^6#|yCfPQZF90l1-wHnJeY zQ;<*oJ;`76+d>T2N63Cj>$gQk`t{@MsdUKGdaT~I*cg6)l^LXeNAI2eBW%(G5r4H; z`bTkW>-wdkis7k{*Mrxq$o3V5VV^&~xUY6#9UKo{JIx2nieQ~9OY^TMa@Ny@1LLv6u^tc~PfqXddH2lr^V&Bb! zd_nWYCCYF>_G{X=cc;kqcWOwDOI()tnjpUBn)Flm;QJ4hD4Pu!_~g5j>u@|1o&;r$M~`%2 z=glty{DiPk@cAXJt;{0e}CjB{$BJ1 zl$Qp4T%(2E>AmQpAJVxmou_Ajm%3y5MDaWyzXYGwcl5kOHuy)UmA8xM`S>OHA>-dI z8K3;NJB@OCp3fW9&&}Wqy`uf;@Lh3g|H)knX7l)`f*%jRuP8U=v>y@QV1LuWZ_wlW zI*~eVy_|o8{mle_exr(IqC))*d5@ z;J$G|X=i_nxM+^bcC9HT*FXPWxxP;c`vmR=->Q`Ms6Hz9XE<Y?liQ7F5FedbQGALRIRTj~`wQJ(QwpgoCK{!o!Uq8@_FGeQ2R8INYtm`Fv6IE9qw zFDG1KfSeVnli4BSl*az{+tpi+4>W!#k2@-d>10U)&jg>ww-2t?=&EG6_j4&v{j>Tb z`(o;sLY~Gy(w|q+$;{iQ{*H`OJklyftEJKSBI<#@`=$n-fYdv>;!nBEV^Qh(r9HGB zNdbS=?loDt%wr+_F%5i=@sL5xV>$Kd`@g7XS5Q4?f-fTG^Ebj>O11-fzV_6~YJ~+R zE)kEozofquuW`@!3}Eq6(syVt?n%{&vd2dcUomL&R|d$3B}1N`PwkxNrY6I>=L5nW z!0EZ11^@n`z4+;wcY!O@fR`5;zN_oBxx=PaJ+@W+U)bj=Dc1>P-?D;3tl>t1N<16# z)E+(@wd!?*(GUCOsXfsC+0VBptPV51!D&7we7x?LFF9_$E8|1!affpB040-;1D=d@ z&GbKuhXd#BMGM@4wCt;oTB=~Dv__6+8SsbBL({;Y@|mUs&7;H@@iBv+37-0Ft93MA z30!+m+E4Ah{k%4L+5D69K2ECNZ}S!ZF=bi1eWDDXe3%*XRKMffJz6@x#x&o`SmMdR zseTW(op?5>-iZsql@8z)MTYOHRI&AlvA-ry75^9Z*>EmH=P%RNPpTYl6{y5BAfJi% z1^>Qh*zQP%o6tV!ezMWNtKakc$@tZB+@$&)dUJ5V^PzEn2iEVwb}1+M{iYc>wZETF z>^vM{6V^%ll7UlvmwtP=oXX~h{r+izJCIJh^t@yw!>zwc`>6eDimUeW{Sj)vwBN9( z!m0s$zk%8>;ob8e&Bt-={lNO~m}%~(biT1K8+OHk*R|68@56!f_L~8o89eUeye^!)?u=X72A&ZRKe?JpneaoWEsx_Qt_j$4xCdY#(m^nnx0^ZH57lJTYX zb+>V(n(tpZfYbQV`k&_iP~80G1E==YbdIeC?OzGp3_JsAOvNtSBbohi$j?Sv<<5lN zQ4F`if9(Tl=Y--%+tI#{&>x3<-84B*E#CdznP?`jz;n}P@Di(Dil%)+A)j(W&M)R> zvK<$>U~a(ucSA45H||x`0v_Kq=q39{Ryr5O?RNmrK>Anv6&tzzwBD!v&(1e?PUZEJ z4LR*Y>Hlj@@^$WCGVnOybymggj%EI*#ml&ufiEv(zMqHT^j#*xM^>45mg5e{W#T>| zymtHbd6|3~aJr93_+s>JIyVsU&1@&jCp+skIDCTJmks%J=j{{ESE0g;r@$%z4z<0H=1e{`$^=+`c%QoZpS> z<$YC~YvoF+FhB_ZGaygx^Jbd^5n>%AE`e(bO8c_G`=!_Ht5Fj6<5WM|$1)Bp#yL-l zb-uWSd>rzvA4)v~M}4ZM=cfd222SxQb!So?ddH~1>AP4|ey!#6-{$2zAWz@LD&FX7 z1}{GiIQd~Le}5D&UpG#!(@B5*8>1?5{oW1|r|-NJSsXo__H%@N&YAMLH-$m^cd>e_ zoOk*PT>Av=1L->x6Gzbc-tRy1seb0)u0NI6Pcm?-pIzn7ujTdQ08aDUrMD-V>Ap

|&1#LTA2FZMdYk;u0B_h13H$Lhw8IqeK1$s!&j_;_YX$Nme(T2&qvgbQ^0F>YwImOo>PBJ1->`DWjG(t(~(d8 zG3w;Cdwjgk1Wx^N&+~3g_;^J9k;*^u;`9JszCK&Vh5F-9?>aj0^5cP%A3L17uXy>+ z)3V;FeyX-_x{}8~1@dax`7&|)7#{yr;1vIH+wD(z{1bquBTc*ZeFN^F8u^(>Ys?zl zjgPnLf24oZJ|EosDvgh~>1ZE%@XorwU#ns5F9Yo&9(em#!wMB(cmndZJ!Bk;MpheF zkm1RYPXVvcy{+#T0?zxh7VDK%@P56T{<^RY9f|d)46N_c!Moh>a7GdEM1RaiKAji6 zl|FWIQHFc&$^Js?(ayc=%;on7asSGAk$jo*QC-5BycsyHFV~Db{T5$eCIhGOZSiqc z7+=3?NgnB){d4jaWBSvOPwUGreXkbP0vGX0!~IV-(hTqi{aCVnajPQW5`20-g1+yN z4gQ9wYf6={1kio^-QhX=ZS*@7{c{?eR?k8(NXsx2P_hRMS&&8iY-h}Uz(0Y4q z;m;@2{kXvOFQk8(TXNmn=H-v8BH*WA9`}=Uo|n|Kxk_n~g$dk-b3R(Hmz~+ZJ;zg^ zpY8`;&kr{YXYvWaQ<1L!>4P#63^$yX^EtIA>uSY8CF)s}Pxpg#KXf!E<4=A+ME8S) z5AOQB8pri7rT=8#nN!X~yg#Uc$0PlE^W~1zAAId4Xa6e`_9uW>Y1M*?5xKNSx*w!? zrhxzXnEj(w@LPdP_?Hg7Y2ZD)UVeEbix1roQh(Wyx7F-0hO1vm|0uo{ezWc5@umAg z>hHUL-k}a-@um0?KBi*1g&cQczk=G=%wi>%@%l+Y`P4p|B*$D0XZjP!KBQ%yUp_~1 z6aL2|KOO1L{978Tm^|IjWdeV{U}rPm4^h9C{?mHw&f@#EqL@6b!}Z`@ol~p0n&EUm zmo-S<_il+9QIy+nGt1vMkbO75zp#MYmjJyfNIQMkH=El>_iOZf?9*Qv{^jvYg=3AO4xc&-Ul#X9kr& z@4NVKc=>d{riXlZxWdTmS05(hLiQ&_&hE|aiw92a-3N&NqgDp` z*QdseyL|mm>q9EPyT-Vimmd##S|2W0**}q&p8%Zv*z=2aJTIT_*GT{1?`}Wi`pvj6 zq4-7r{nIEOzjWxQ_}O|+n9t*vN&ew{bZzU4v!gUJfWm*epHhd*I1Jg9@po?bQ)HhW zyc;bir;s104*z_bit^&YOKE5*NpC)$W(3JU zX+EMJA5WN@#4nXy`S;% zfcg`azeTrjHZR`+dFoG#zgqnvFFy@9`Qd)=?qps*-EUF-O`c##KJ^9pmG1GV-bY&g?d|1s{*Ku*(77 zoJkeuYgqeC!FZkq{6cEYGX)r)fqc5(IzRn{t02Smkk1D1Nw3lU3IP}Ed)hzIW4)k_ zlJWR_;c8Q1tebd$&&0Yb4!k8hmUb=zo)}*ekWc&F&T8Xo6lFNwZ_#@1^Y4xw=j-Ft zAo&_qM%%)fd^&Jizl|@m^)O$*WfG3@FY3pd{CzU26yR#L^s|4n;~R=G{d(k6f8JjI z>Ni^8{`)7aKjSF{|LW-X$`v;$0xo|4ME64p;O}|AYitQ)0A1m)54>k73#kMAGo^aJ zUD6Q97xB)-eNZ}hukPkCvhSeh+z-`*=-wBu$4_f|Yl%OFJe`jkO38iJ;wPKziZDvD z!0G&qe!qF8{MJWG_$hGfM^cXN7yduSzB@kYNXRm{apT5~#(`QDH||&$&Jst( zjT@`gxUqGlPPA5W#~rmQYPGR-P-omYYU8NI9XD#VKaP98l7r;;d3^aJ7w-9dz3yJG zd)@2qJ-PnX>oy{8jNpE@qO9;}_3IEpUV*ry6@EPA zhW=u;>a?Nx?ek~m@rV<+7v+*;YyPIV;nwo&t8_d<_NpRz|2rP;xker|zRZ3*^cleW z@|e9{m|!0rkI;Phd*Xo`QUSL^&I&zOJ|=2J|IqOW9nVx5krpc+&(QG*;ZLso+eO5^ z(C@0kufJ>!Pstr(${Jrca8(qyv+#panZGy5?4#oe9q^yl4z$p58N-dJr~SzKuLl+v zkH_Ni`$Sgo#v1bW4Hw#{;|cnm^QqUAI9_Js5{kKC-2VQ!E)3+2t|7pK#-@)a7f7?hW?$@l4 zBmd-4j+`d$*Jxd{gSTnU%7)^8kd9ZJz?IdG{3z}>Y5gWVHrn=+hvtW?*^ji3 zWByUaaQkWf-qxwu5pn-U>o@i9P~x=ZV*iYgr}g_yT(cWu`&Qs&XVJ&`n~Uw!ewg$} zrj?Nf=*NDT{F}@CWUuI7H}sQ#7yb6(j_6-6*@yMu(FEz_oc6=2T-*=!Na$-E z%v^Ck)BUv`;Qzhd@JXD{k|^GPI{(s9l5$jBZxl-I7Y)kg!;*bJX2N^G+Nbjq)PCJ6 z8%K!k8z5&!x$OJ5N-5CPXOv?N@y_b~Y@lN(A@^HU=9p2PSb`hWT&jx)u@D>ky`mgAJGwL-M zhqs?QD8%tMK;8ykqZThFisPS*dRmXl#Jf+4<45_}1zy2|k{06lc~Ead`xC-S^%34D zDOcp>_E8)+aZE@Oa)+JUF-axiT9ATufcd4 zfxoEuw5XU*T^I)|@DYC{j8Y2nwEv-ewRFu#kJx`_Q2)*hyjo1`zZxeqjkhT{-~$phbzazy)@4m?wA#r zZ%VFjep$>nssh|T$~Sciba^7?8y#>u{eUs{(P0WzS8|tPRI>QyRkGhiI}_;`$x|;PW!jb zX=zFpt}4jwr+jRi)$N81xY$1(c+|h9e}DQn1Uzb0O!g;+Uw{_#V8A-vAW7u7}F2{|{)>MLtK2ovNrWdiko@7nfIl=nhTrQ&{Qk~?4D za6w*;_#t~1KDXT$$JYos8sFDL+s>fzW&PIyx1xMyycnkt^xIKS@!NWXcU^>l(|Sqc zceU-O8{+u6Ay4D?L~E)^40d67#1QIK@|wTz$KU z`BObRFh5F4t~w{?M_mzaFXhK3Z|@co^P>?s<;Mk4{hEvU(E+?MW#veG@H)BJ;iZuTI{BWMfmm9nSwHE(Hd4}O$)a%nYui}Z4*W?a90;2y_MY)~L zq882<^M?-g+6!Dhsm+xOlplQK9hQjp>Haw*_|J}R%S-nSiQ}yU-wNJ8EeE`(`-jAM zv!dV0;9a@;zI|jOY2u~GSAp*Wzu@kLS~?F+QaQz^7yRv);tkOzV)Byt$BFpS6yyG> zf9zFiZtxgx#k?>AUvqp%?>qvo0&WF<;>K2KUIDkGp5pUf^Usy&yff2p$G*i0p0?f$ zw|Kr;gX1MPaASDcEp)z_jSrpQcH%sj7rd1n+I&|qp4&-({r1rLu;Sd_o~LVCRp2q) zfO?9@dE3U^q4T~Br}Nu%{;=Hi*PUg8ye&w+=AO1=LIgY+IGqnn)9hRrD&Q{Qa2`^JQUm_sU9H;WbpH;$C)L@V z9~TSq!T|RkVpJ*MhyD+ z+6j}CpFNZsnY3SC zZbknokKJw1y^~b$hnar4vNX3}i_(;|ZnsR3k4Jq*0{8E(D}U|?5pWA|8vpdtH#>z2 zcoJ~RWAY{?`p5-bf$J41;8h=~oD~M#=g-XdoKQTZfp?(%bWON{+d+RBKR6yT!0&SA zW@&|vn7m~C;CN7%;r=jxk{*lD1dbQu8-wB@9{dWcXSpI(+4;fokVyPo(kf9w@xby( zTF`Txtf%aK1Zf!O6v&6blyrO-=#LgW?dIG~!}P4T+;3^X zS+DqOQ{=7e+uL&KQ+2su&zM0O~F6%#3x)o#lv@nEQ@8_Jm2{E_L-0;|Ckqj94Ol7+>ZF$&C6zr zl*S<@u7JrK5SQe?d`Sy-$%Ob|M9(mOm0vPy2z=uUe=|-IwGILo?D;mE zeiQiRZf!ON(f#im3eLBz11t~6BM&7(J{2Xy*>Qqf_|Eu_puDX)$nQ(w`h53)#`1h% z$9jBmapYDh1AQMBC!ThJ_wy`05wcOLW+=yLT{TqU{_56gRGtvEANI?eQEzU~_3U4^ zNFFNSv~JtL8~QN)N4bD&I&e8{Jiks`J9hspT9;YgiNDPABJEdP&=Y%T$#c@fd&B#i z4BUhAMzu>5!_c08TwyQyLsgaA74u6!-^mSX5f8wvsPCNxGzhy zn){LRUx7m%Y6RrJYTOT$|L%`;8N~b*51jIA&DK-yi}}w2oaTG0kt-fieq;Sh0#5nF zJFIQA2@ zXn(=!clV0+d)@}(MN8K2CF1egK>zG(+F^j`A1!bT%3d9YRucWAM12yBj=YCpy*?LPM_&)>VVgYaU%Q8hGfU|i_&!N$MkxAe+sl8ZB>jEE5|NbHKJy-PJ zt`zX+?Yj3kN=r;$GX3-%8od`Q9sJ9tD{rFJ+4=Mwn&&0AM_GgWWyhxF?igiue(-r9 zJ@^;qO0TeM=HmQhc{w#GFI&K8npwQld$DM~4s3j7wm4p?;8VQE^>M_|c(6Pc?9X)Y zleeCc(>hI7Fh1oe@~0$@+xwwF8+}A}e})D7Qw#ovdQ;LP)ufr1On>|g(2cPivFP%@mYmx`L)PU5FyT=$5Y}EE^h_@@V^5-u=5Dw zhw9rh&B>h3BapqKKiPVtgPa#7ok!5r z;{Fo(Y`xK=p7n?MA?0VjuP~42{VDqIn*JdeXNJ={;l}T<{I;jWLMh_RXGgfQ7Vp0U zdNmfVCqC{*D_Qn<%)GBR5&Tq?QSI+V(td+{#q^V3X`Rmif99Hh$I7$EV>tQMiFH?9 zoBN^H-m?S46oK)`;!e_)_m|=*9(?kTX{nP!ykLPx7t=L=apB{3w zUSI8bGg|DQ8n_AN{a3FDP{-G;{30sgtc9aktc#N;K@ zA3VNk;P+W(*c0(T<_(RnM92LyvuOTuk&3|aW%-82SDXiI-Xy}WTFBG9G2y$&XYwkFnxejodsxG(N|3inq${WXH7i=5x@&m(}Uv`^iL^nxWiY`)Dq211}=sL{;(l!JCiAA<3WW)_581>zTij zA?HH*+#9PE_VbzNC7iI^1K!3J6)Ohs=UH9|KAuq2i2PtuB5%kzA}H>AoqXuXEONCT-+}urG-j_LO1J=cP+1XgSUQj z!K!i*N4=*A=Pmzqyla?%n}Mt9bGzS`P3s<+iTmCYiM&Q*tpkrySo?H;Kl!87mbUc- zf5@%ilm6Q~lm5!m@4G*y6_0=NM|jP>?WrxM-wAn&hxtvHJ{IChmhlg_i{?j#q@j*B ztE!bi|D;~X)BN}l{r=LD@l%fyuKI%8P4lD0UM@~0Q{N4Y!4%6=h zKAQ>nJ|F5=nV0go_3!L|<{!GwMtRv?tW-mBUGNm)$N%KNVsA#A7Uz?;6km5K|5SZ? zub6lo;BL*wN7sP+>E)4s`iRF-M%2@BqNUWg&&1;x(ogGJ%N~OsiN`5c$lFo6zgaq! z_O<@;M?Lkw!G?3K#N!OgH)`C6SgdpCL79npCotc5p{L>s$JP)NLpe_QhU8xzI&xQT z^26M}4Y}Pql!bmaM}z@q`Gf8+a6`Wly#2+#_?nJ)xHf(qLwptZR`BDu4c!*0Cnhgh zzHnpwy(p8x-yQMlW)8&?hgoL!RbG(xU65kCn{7 zi}irvPHKNBUpMl_e?0cI)^Fbfm$`w@VHLj5t$wq|eLv(zL-s%GUka{IQvYk{msb+= zrxn+s3Ey76=6>2gGWpE-*K_||*c-oHoIgg?ll_Sg`YxgMh{=>E{$5&tM%lc!n3fCt1s^c%rD@}YbC2=tTpmdC$x0MAFXK3l=h+vR?~ zNbGwAepvAOoDBY@J+8}9L`2E#RiPhl@V@=`b^~_&$UY3Gd`RORQE*m%VZF?ZCx3wX zWOhGqm$L5I%ljlx@t|qK{nF{IVOPLY5Q*`^C)t7s;ExTzFrU*VFsAoAUl2xLaa1+0XKg0eU^u zPw?hgRGo7g9~w^$_y+KQ?NjzdPUE8h&kA0PVgq`_Fz5O{%>HE5Q#>{-G`U|cAs$`8 z$-h6gY#S9T;2z*K-|`Hpx19aXJo_;FyvP@ne-+KRAKX38=yR+6w9G%OKUT_5;GJK) z{%RiZ7;Z$p3wG`LeV-(+fG6SiVswbhf|L45#Qb50JlS(()7PZ~@&|Ay%A<>_^vnnS z%pUST%_lc_#Xc4d%dgBd#s3fE2hS%j_~UR?9KeRus5UK4(@y6us&`bMMcfE@0fceyn??0U2bmuN66+hf5m+y#{V? z!+UKl|LZ&){oc76{F`w%TK=!|aLHeA{qf*ycfMVb(|I_uSIP{;hn-JIg&m2I4*`~f z?;@X_PjI20(U>3T_%yvQzmB#oQmQ2#3|F+`b~{$_d383Wba`=oa2U9p2E4x%H)FEq zlkYynpyNRUc+`Gs>p=P0eWks#8H@m1@9^OwMBUr>1MyjkKtH61w3|ML2m zztKLG>6f(S{ik(y$N0es;n)}Wa4Fr7s=;x_ACkm6^Ix`Gjs8jXkatUX{EVH`rNpYx z79$8Z0awd7KEL_ikCR)sF9KYa2>in0+7+1Z<`3Kbra?mS%<~iu;B*{xy|Cw1sqgLe zNPjADI!}@N_UzB!X>%_m{prB-vI^g4RAQ%PCtmmXnf=e!eMviRKlzvZ(7fBjAIZ;* z%RbCsYUoo#?!<{rnZHZJ^aaOXJb1EgvG;P=_h-95(gMDv-^tc&U&(wzAErMzULD{+ zaGaL2^-tupc^4diOc#sGM8riJphcQl29j=GS0UHsYLmKqaI2^5={xa0SwDWk+!1XBYUY%XQzYNn5lb6ho!Pgt~;GaHz_E4;OF`H zjaA{>aEkt7ekcEk^~~=nu){(9LmO%MF7lb*J*a0i=673AeADxs9B229@bx?0!Pigw zU<(VAom!>24mjR{G#^czG@4@{_L_KdeM3NlTFKg$vB1{W!J4{2c5LhWYo0u)_g)ns;gV9_(ii z>X|&t>#EBb-$%S`eDCvTasQ<0#O=0%=WhNsQP@ApQ{M6Gg9h++Rj&U%#Rt=GM!mto z=iMb~@?_c{F`V|NHt<$HHlOx|zyHH<(ogLx7fpFZHZt55q`yzQin+!9(R&R%;61B1 zqPy6?WYjA#+NOq{pNjNUlzwN zeGJb#$>44Ls$pKS|F$6g&cdA-_-Ig1??YPA zeE0+LcwFNSv@c?0<$j`lX2?_gX3Ts2m1v(0IQjpJea+j7{WnniD5L+>O%{*$$^Q!A zN1hu~ME`qGpEim6vF48I>7sp#ZrpCNZ^*{aA4L1;{j}uAaf?F_ivBY|J_Y*U)H@w5 zwr>Vb{=am4;U=+t8*qAG)Zuey@{8@$`)QLgPNkM_+$8$P71aNqEKe$n{qq2)IBNR! z*R{p|DQ*OgUu3UlWySGR7`cBmD7#N8x>M|bGV~jOS908cBaV+PNPpf%UknuWn;~aI z>D>OzB%ZI)kbS`SEgaXK)(3z7L%lMQkMF)07gmesYg`zA4|v0$Osp8o)2ly!87Tg{ zb35~0FF2T%E2iIr{G$Qhw%g6txj|s-p6e~ok1p^G;4O5Wxsityp*_Z@=izBTYX*N? zwO>lou?pz^{@I|{4xXx=@-zJ)9qS*hD`~rVKh7Fs`-=06@+0As_cl2wMZcIlFV5i_<>1FWAZz`a;6#?2fxOa=nO(}2@)MqIC`a>8|`%ePRE-~s#Y}RnVcLCTow=f3ajva zwpN<+LzSZ+X0rc%`ZKSKQ~NXayxr4qU+ewArAa~UZ!K!sd}dI$7KEn+wLc{K)BJuN zh72M7X~3_s3g73>%NqYhFFjS3{qJi()Dq<1f}!R6F^qkf|CGJB{p8=sn(qdS{?!7f zv6&G-M>&QF+2(Kv`(C;`FnqgIfkbI zr}6Fg>C3rtwZHrR{!<*&{oA!4^nEQ}cc<%A8PGF!&)SaR{?UW|y}A8#-9DuAq9Fe&CChsmh))ao5&VQLx##BeJcAc#ou79R}o*KP^@ zJBI81F!PVxihAl__YvDhDFmGI4C(hYy4EN}z*Tg-it}N=emC#2h`XVm@<>>*>VrcC zc_(l$%E!;$3b}yWsegUB{RzD)?xgbxQr|p~OZbOM%F*Tl3H<>vJ2TgNBlK904k|tF z$Fda1p^2!c^WX1B-t}Wl2lJByIITyMVs6Z(Imhr+;N+(Q+o$~``XL=S`Qg&6KF>uz z=zvT5aXW9HdDt{k&n;m3?Z~&8`TkPXfifW<>mf(^c+z|A3voT5d~57w>Q98617)p(=YN!=eKB9Ffv2KeRVlAM3U+X7xIeA!`2IK@yv?_d|3i72 z*-O8RNBP#=HGLZ8I{$d!ckyUEru>tyj5r?J{@jo8C>zf^agbtz$y-oQ`PY4@w}WDc z;Yq+LEA2;T`4)L7BLP zIm7TI$Wh*3vFQ6R!*3){Wf~Zs0-W-GmADe0e}1}w?rWB%0jIp{aqft)C-nYE@)^J> z?{;W)=;588F3u%f`8BtX^8WtF-{MEjuMh@YrUm{dtMGlswE1Y>aOVDF_P?)xG9CQ& z7pw4nmR;W2>D2b$>$CqE9*_0>4y*8emT#^+xk>&X3$y=yxZH_xq4C}RXjHf`Uu90{ zzsCf8pOfvc&RXAfY#jTa$$Np*e7_tewda)AGhoN!T4Pt_l-KFL$CT$c&xe_qcCMfD zx^^J<)A_%)9}GA7VSoGasHgc{sGGEeLcl4nlm55$V=jdVxSR4Wo*&yd4dtRWZ#G8&m;R5uJtkq$PzgRhKW64_rJ36~(A9o$;-ImW7{!N& z>QGO4TcPdqg&;3C0;fE2w1y%<%oA4N7>Yr{9_Y39yv=;Aw z2@!D0`$q6)HmKbpRKO|klm6CoC5J@)R>;{==21OS${{c2eHCyg%E4Wu&qcuw-di5G zl=t1>b^iC&;Ap|#B;-MgtLTuje~NimGnm^;^Rncphp)xFs{n35Ic1*aXbkkTJer32 zri9dmYXHC3q>EqDeR3ql z`logy zcg^8W&JnNJSEgSQiSz4tFUre`8ykwx=~3SI;QZT);V*WCK^K!Z4C8*IeC7P%pD)Gv zLHa3QEjt$Vn|M58hP(}>Y2dS#;_*N->S_GtVRl1=o_E0K@66+H7kG(Ie*UWD^F7UJ zKa1{4M7|TxF?b+Xpk?koQNH;ie%N>_fNM~yhI4yerH>SgR*P)^d4Vtw#*xl%8o(bt z>e}+)=Z2a8T;N;5`?p!E-MNJEPewi6@3*O~rx(3n!Y>b;;=Agz8wZqG@|pXF=jiI3 zuO|MMPj%}I`^x0KxGqQW<;s`WcU72w#PKEnZ@M$>i8#LuBe*|O^!$Ay^6hy}i}TA2 zJhc;_NAo@`SQMe=`o;0Efk)$~ZyWo2BzT-1n9q~JZyq;jQxtftziw);1CQ&1F?D{X zaq^ERa1BZ?%4W+i9L#BaJn*l|!tGpkxPB6y|MvR_^>jaFX!}3n>AW|?DL>Kt={)yz zeR2NSAW!4>&@jB0czw@IILb~nCcVpx@zqH}6^^|;-bsHl;>iX6yN!J-74q?e*8zI& zgszKvz_0(q`*!|KDLLI&GCN$D|LT$44_3<`zZL<9U7rrVPRby5e}Mt#@8cn7LCJ7- zzl}}!&iLk_>#Y*pKgjjT@va)h?XyGw{mCXxBv6YvMBFctv9zO0%-8h% z=JMP9+cL355#8iRjXh7X|9$4K@4s!3#lIIg-KU_$`%bd+YWm9=Mv9JS}}$o2jH!xBSI?b(6bNUo?PT#?nDToKRZoxo3Y zPwgs>j{)^=luMoRR$_cuVZRsnsN`Ht#Q4wwSB>HJ4rp}#oZlEezg#T( z#{s<*pGz)yri$_DhP)T$f+7P~i~Xbay=ec7K1T!Qhi)wQiw^D2v$QtSII{7k>w9!x zix=~(q3T5v@!$@>Kb-~neLYs_onLXNO^7dfGU_Fm_nX`Nd0xz)F5o8I-~0LCUu{Hx z7=e3GjvAS=j_l2;zY5s>;%tE_|Es^6aoi7Q_NIO-_ScAd^8bl9Nk57G^&oBt-*@?s z9%BA+<>%|99eV0E-(H{k!QzkJGe+_&{!ViU`9UWEassHO7JDt0WA_E%wg{IV;NH?KZy>&B^+gAK z?dE1%Vu7=DFx&d&!`Qm!gq#s_R+LPXt%FIzcQ(#R_#HdiM;6I_XSO(xQ^8Mr%J09r zn$YuS(a-7B&SRcOG&LHw7UO{Ki;_&>b}ri=?G1=C$f<$9U!MP-7$?eSyj?x;JO@;b zvf>~_;tE>FP2e$mnSI*lf$|kE=>Eu(_pS5zostaLr&~5HQS5&z^rfL6M{e#sEyPi% zyEfk!kuWFbx|#!eTO3{auT9;p57}dZ zADp;8vUlIPfcx<1ccL;N|I@XV%LISPC3vp{$?Ikh>`VRikJm)*C&Cwwo?KOwR|1bm zx&DPiMmGH~d;5(TK5$fvvHxFtlc2BB@Eyh8_x#oldqY!EpVXG;OYOu~X7ZVTe1SVI z@Nu#%(mtp8!ScQV_7YC_y-qm2<2CU_eUeGsel^N1Z=P)x<1rrfG!C<#x1TP~Ckt>b z`n7z@olT=QH3+g}lvv%oS)5s3dpY%R6 z3);(Hc5-Xc9tY|v-bTkA`A>{TdY>7|?=F3)y(pgw`E-;!H!Jm`zvEFanau5#H1Clv z+DrGPs)3iRb2yIXsyH4LKQ(U;EiAU5)}6nvko*x>_em1@fypOAFXiv~j|Ns3b{=hI;kc5r*Qi}*Q%aZTqo72r{mI_ zhGmWDK4zvr3Gt){Z|%M@P3ZWU;U?76_$7t!*%okK;~Af~l#kk%ifJN_j|1|QPc9Yf z(@h+o)S&)tdGTPb_}sHSFV|1wGycfTYNCIAFX|~eIbI^6{tb%CI48zeI`pf-`)^Z1 z_sATMyXn3~J$U4=xb6d%u=kqLn6ubt$LndxzZT?yM6_dqd{n3MA?*B)D97>@9j{BU z-q^waYW>^4(Jh)@5`TQ5oiy;Sx408V&yM-y1Gr==_k-!1vtQ(a2DXn0UcVW{_A!aH zE<#R^lHqJ0V-&tKz6bjN^A~(P%zJqL;QC~tskk4`i0gynr`Ga{@2yXUKDu5~;=A6b zq{#GQ9;e@rR{qZQ*9e>ZPG(}QWPO<3F6i^1JYG1@<`C#(xM~{r2c6GcH1pp#p;@@h zHJm?ZFdAxaAKkB=@UG(&_SGjZOCG`TvA`>b-OamatKC0!8E)v!=j&f8d79M6vAtV8 z+TFPQ50IDI(LNpj?_AO&*W?My9E3Z8)A4`7&E-B;=}>{*FC%jUAI}7QpNyw{OW*qY z^9%MrYu{$!{hPole4m0LV+Z6lKi$p#XZ}=8=k}}cdkM}b{5UmX#OxySB*x16FuoV< zCH=(rTROA-h^H*j+`|45PUH6Cv6(dd>U|gC3t{Uzva0kpC9=glpF;uKZvW{U=|krT_X4Nu=p##yIlrpzH~oOiR5Q7K z6ra_;Ua+ytv-GAUuLDl;S!Q>OJBOQ=_7ZLcPVuQtztH*lz+C>+&ircy?w>F|q0SXn zEqYU8^Cl+G{A&kpe8&Anzwde7(DxUaiLtUi%wJB}Y(r7;3hTS|b zc)L4u*LYSgU3R{E z81GN|dmcAt@U3fiPL9=N=hJgyUdY+O?|roQHKi&$Klph*7x)j_^q!Ji5xB0fJWu&q zDyU-571@v)Ua_e4&Z*F^|0uz&vT?$s2EPiBZ-h}J#&07 znSeV`Z!XF6WxE!YABF<=jZ?S>`gQ$zJE`Em-J+XE$6;g=TZa_gxxcC3=|TO~&*t-r z`ctrB{Z7;$78k+oX>HsOk8NEt&yP`i{`28M?Qy^Oo+pJ|Jjz6r3}@@7UHH!Wol!cl z-_FzgIt$~o-}!NYugx9EBRgqN#rX8`wG-wEXeaBu60LjRJZPOyrsooDytH$;y>uOD z_L@eD5CQitL_B}Vm;~deEBWyYoyS#v z&;3)QX6Ypny6k*<{+0CWiND~Vk&(W<7OX$p^N-+5+DyM0rOM6^{(T$=_)B7xsqBFx zQ9qkE8qB}U=ZQ(b&psB4if|A+NI9rElG&dO^d}y?(XU^O z3CFnm`Wq?<`n|H!w`La?^R)wV6rZ0qO(`rD?2*78>Tj`&yXuJXn+|!h_n$}Z@?!i- zk^=30HhG0!w3qT3*{cSBPn(k8p;CXiQ zTApw2|JU^&X)1Rr8{d?m{&o*-F+?WdhB;g=4ZKmswJk#gJOlM6JTKpObj*ox;B5W{ zzXweD1NYC2ADu-MDZC%_m-WXwgy&CM?>3}K=ZEMygXv35=lwB3Puf79=l&_GoE@4@ znzH!ue+BXrA!oG4ER&}N@>%=zUOZZl-)h5miTe$Ti*)GezqLjialav1$nDd-;qz+W z+23E#euL$g%-e5(ewm%vXiAI_pNWWX zE$~(?d;gtFz~fO*>w$G?>)&DpT(XRhFU_ZvVvQ<`>tzz;X?{!|xbU&KUZw=;zgZ)t zNoXRsgY`cRIF0+4FB;F63%CV%2Fjk^xyP00pMSiupGraAQZD9xIRATxzjGt+@YeWo zBIQF#UcOJ#f}i?Fw#H-^kiC?Mb&z{x+qCn~!X1TNZ7`%mQ(ZhzhZZ=@Kz%RALoLEeiogcjaR4?WJNl5K>sJJ4K&yN3S|0xw*!H%mXSij>TPsi1X_%8C< zakU-wOpPy2WF8qm9`?U*+E?eea_36ytvgkKXTDEEyPh8>&d?rT9f~UtEY4^jV}hPh z#w8=A0nkK_8u3pADqxDL2w9iPv}n)g412)GeA{XTvB`;~Ty?Mv`pW-EAk zI<-9`hrDmxGvC*)f5qFUa>@YXT&Y9!4xcwe4T$92ka{K30$#IcyhpN$t?2d8;|>g>l+k9EMg3OPyQlHSFI+MMg4Bb(LSh6xozn= z>Gy)ys>$F~(x21(b57!Rr2Wx!EZON#zR156kGfUdA4w%&-4**|Mm?=7tA5#1QS6Tm zIPL2`KAm2X`oqRU1w0w$n7EB6#PN2*4j1q_y*_LZ$6E#516(`zO=N^H-a5pAVm0r7 zM!DVINCCGa4mH3}T^oBfO2EyS2L|9Xo_-FG7H~WAuNio$Ye$k}L>%jr4fq!8FMs3` zajf6Tz?V;`nkQDkjYIhU+XZ~|{iyj$0rz76;16M(h!omHpps@C7 z9_&kKycyq)crXv-?P|bRtu6d6Z=zHpu276`1z(N*mJ$40UDr$VS+etu;2WUd27ctF zFP`Q%W#>C5^7zz%?*#vGr+q~W#AoMQ!FPYn`|kn2#Lb$?1@+na-fy`6WbjpMxPMyR zUv@&J&CX8---Xfu{+NE>-72Kc&ewovg?=me{l>|z7FK5GD@O7BWB@-I{B8?#*^2nQ zAMAhk1m1s|UvBU}S`9OcW=OK}o!~3*{!GPMZtuL`@BCFPJv-kX#MglzGO@k2xbHkc zaDOO%lzVvoH-rD*iXFR4q-N(+{FuA&^AvXQN3R@jR{PEq1nZ~x(SFVCc7Y%FI=X5} zM|M8NPsVQEA20YdGH&lI2mr(1Md_K|h%!AMG+{7^UVe5}(1Gksfr<+U<#F(+ zVe)3+bi6rfQmLtV1>6Rl_WSK~DLdv9@MPe0JQ}|B!R!12?gCE7cW26P{!~D~J;3Ss zXGWDh%7Ox}*vRdp>cToU_!ePIDN1E>97rIkB$ zMFiXioc2p`wN|b#D&Wb$X}{CubkXo)0`3A%`-|0{Ijf5cxCb~LuXk=!uYCytS8U?; z(|PC7%AM=g0%9`$6Iti&v{4E_4uM=R$~51 zlOa#{^SrvdXyBlj|E3b|0#5hyBz<>f)rjNo{P(*1=AX<1{NwG8kJzl-e&TiI*}ckm zNM5m-+fVoNoV(FxZ1vdM{zsL4@=^_Ox}Rt5H;H*_&Pn+R@-hSPuULieGw=T6v(Jh> z_{9Ea@{S<;%BCr|H@i@mo zT)@e`YP%kuxZY~VbZXxNoa`%e<(HGnks-emuGqruC;PPdd)+>Hpn?DN8q==Zl4)bZ`fG=ixaGU7jUxgkCBDS6g;z!o(qtAfRlX*8RwmsuMe3@`W0Kb z{ry;l?=x&gi(HehbA>0L=>>GD%?52$sts6QhOY~>rJMPbv z4g5T|Zdu1=vUEN!TrzO{oY4Ek_e#wW@YwizP*3BxW7M1ep}=!$FMcC$ub8z|$DGArz7dVYy^S6(RR$0OyM`G=( zc5?e@{Qf>(srVqn_!i9PK3t{)J_v)LESoa2SmitZSF$pBHO?DRe3of)FZZ;YqiMa6 zS|LyNP1<=-^Io^O4D?Iwz{$STy`%c=E4DNhxXcNh?E9|Ih;0pXCl@7oH*m6V<_2AQ zxq)d6X8o6Xfs=h3Ha7nv_lRqkfXh@V-2Nec35g`%!T2W2?H^LvS212($QPzfJYKHs ze6w68kwJfg2))(s7i}O1kKs1dQ@p%99O8RFIoHGbYknOVFUkUQV-*S2 z#;_I`?t(n|Q*~hQS3k{f`hjo{aPsH1-Cbj%`%a_%g-o$4aK2yNv;C(#?FybGc@1## z=g9mw=Tu6~0gBy1DNDezRLO_CK?q&R^>l zJpVq?+Q-V2nfA+*A)h&a>ukOpBH%9IB!6n4t9qz_dw`RF%dR?hRi1^*ENywa6i>wu zyVHNEU`<8;q?+BB?|5HiM6dj(E+xI#LAU`p*GIjQNqVvzm(EHb}dv`;?WBzpS;PK`LzO`MIw_yVA zMLqc=qr*R)!?SQ%M!P_NY+6*g!lcp}de(O~-nu=3{%Cu4-c-{TQp2)OW@!*6!#lx_Z>wAX?xEnah z=TXScgbKJ9IN5)AW{v;kS-8}Mb%*ko<=oa^X2{x>M*pO`pSk@s-<)xA4ZoGnXiB&d zIL){Hdup{Va_8|w;4&+4inq5ZiT%4g-#wV*?Z9ciT^K)qdc6nx^@KZtlYa-!x) zZoeM#6^$dLask%?r}&Y-X>1P@a0~7uQ6PSI4SSp+6L2f!sr~S@F~`OJ#p8ZcJ9sHC z=gt%RNBSMemuDwQddc)z_PHTP=Tr8aXgn=M!0Gym7rb@98cv4_IOSvN{}+S4IVu(U zuiMZ4;|k~gUDe@zH_<*LaI&v+=*F)_`>ep}e9p|ZyGo1pQUC1V^%>jw2>D;km+9~? zm5*zmh>)7NA6P7~kC;!~&=hNU7_M+~dno^w8G5Tx2=JWRqw`?>tK?3}sXYz! z8BkVio)8l%v}Z*gjyksnkLT$v)Pf zO#8v>Uh-43@Eq)?_^0dXrYAohlIs7*_(NZEpF6+E!1LRG5b=!t+;?#w7K`&m1Khcs z^W^VSHi`4a0G!SrR*>!6Di`#VJ!bIUTsbi`40uldC3_l99MUy7zH;IxLvMP2>$;rA zgXXgvyq9wgVIiihe4#kR?XqEAFi70(|JV4_{RoBj&)%C;dm897pj-y`*{}ili^;})A41|@B3~S z{h|7W`-9HsKIs2YN&aB+G@d%}T5Q|VQnZiuXXNj-aS5eG{WKm{$Y7XGRl9VB5HI9k zFY<2*-QvEYe~pmS<9?%|$BwiU`)37C=eteMD|{!~PyV%o7tuxXjc7mVx8bz{%8SrB9H2T-|Sye7bD_WXNwgNBF zcvNVtfUAJpfgj4{R4WDCiG7O`xb{IWvcihkA!IcE~>w*#l^ zDVC$-nu+aa>W81N3~p9Kj2}1TjnKa^yv1$N|6bs9J*M-}3QffJGxcMf*GxFLE+GDn za{uU{f8Cv!G2-|efm^VT{kCf7-^KPxKdpy{|NLS%t%uA%cF3!sU(r$BF(Cec)AgXG zw+mMg+b8{Y#QCtO&Hcsxdm&HpfBNRD@5T66{f4;5{b6nPr_K@EC;d9ivxW=0-52M# z5%O-#udU?^_7~?L-3L$WQ^9L@cZvDa4tZLieqC)#6!VW0IIT}3|EYIK%s+16biJ#5 zopKVfe^%gLls&tgj~DGH`&7s?`KHDHD&~LP@7zC>fA)3zsYXEl0Z!M`LO))}E!t1| z?a<$GYm;VT|Ll;r!+$^b8sZhlkNijLPpahcYSDjg$kY0>`r7NfqW`?WY5j@SI8sFa zsg7~`=z3rMdz%8*Unk^s;8my*{y_8(+2@6QKdS1+iS}6`XN7(H_WYd?Fn_6kSl_B` ztP-$acS4@lw>1l2EED_h22R%_wVr)D#P;pLy(r&pNIRU9e`)<|u>ABe(SN$*+&^?2 z^n<2f6R~|Ga9aQ37Cnp>+qVLz>!Fc{Eu%&IRlw~iS3RzLN%XG~{dNMsWPVy&j6W;< z=LWt&@hVA-ZxwJa@DXjiN5%QA!@N+P;CA*swbCQz7dP^U4){7r!Tw@?vjR5)-`#0n zXEDF3fLno|k1{P3^ScxI*$zBIRd}qpz8HZ!ftNTGnMYjTyvUnw;BQC$(JwF7Ki}~~ zm>cImjC7s=ypW-5z4>sQPsfjp@5T8fE%rmIliV+tt8Du#Kh{l=Z^!vH732)yuUzx@ z#RA&E<1?n;hVzjs$XUVf^C4<-L3Iv%oX=H2E*bnaZ*K2bDYNr+IRBkY=gGmpQ@KZt zLXzx!Bd!m)7V-0_3KzHcyZ%G&70!^7ss57n-;V1`R$N!nfj_s@oP9;ov-1_W{^mq! z20uxE3e2G=iB@H~ed{C>aB9#JecyM6<%_tNtpF7WqMZ#%PiN_M^(*T;$P z1;6B(^Ln~Zgp6kEvn`qXL-PkO?@y{fzOsYsW&I7lpVA1Ptl`(*DoNSfr~BdPeo8C& z3Ffmit0rcn^Hrcolp0}(fyQW@PD}wHY`q?ogaKZoE`j2p3wtq zs^z8}s8{-S0*tJn2i#uFpRKmTyQEZtA(1b;%6SNrRwX6IA< z(EXGi@N2K$zqfu$c0R=q-A}1H!|h!&W5uU09NGC4KXgB(0sLy8Hmqrol$}rUL-$i! z!FTU!QnO)Vc0R=q-A|be{@XWo4mGl5=Lg4+8~g&_3@N2IW#?1;(EXH(v)taLTdU`8 z9G{&}@k94h>cF>acMNT!&(05yA2ay7&hE-+s?E+1jvqVt`;yAMZKlr74~`!f_*FJt zY1v$vogaKZr5F6W-+9`wi{4_qvFG}N@2B)pB>wlyY~X&q&2yO~l!gz0xL;P-bc z5D)3#Pgr_c6Q$42xBrOy>`^K&a6hSjJJ~Zj`#cTT;QgiX_4suJJ@`B4%wHFy&aOZB zd0GqjZSIxcn=AYCx8cF_)B%3654|+8LC@c^`DhM){|orcEo^?dlev8~E;7U53gY{K z)E5KeLNWGCocO+tjDcL9;%42MS&OBKOgrW$G@5J~{1Wxm7`{Hef#Q4?& zcc5%{5%Of;^%+;nh9)v;F7E(N z?OQuvtV#2i=}!et$GN>PPYtJe%WxC$bd<{;mw%-Y`X{-}?Wg0=hSQ%FiV$$yE51!xg z;KwYedOvse`5hKKzZ1b<_-mcgc@%;A**Z+~J221rZVN`-ra(Rfu1&{xkpk4*`}zC+@_ZVQcH{7>G~n{YVf;BAimO^z)5c4c4CQgH@5A4l zV!g`!r)juWMens^acf7teKglo*Y&WGT$Jz4<(=To%=O!mFab{+5!n7$?Z*bRFWH3W zd?5dC#|trH`>JcaU#a8y{C$(8SuD2ihMW$(N7rAN!iDzr=${dIzL<5p6$0+C1om(J z>v2;=|4{$zkZ%^(`?J_TC+eNK`276&Kpm&pKPzxI%HfK?X3%?q+52~m=)VTzmsEt0 zqZj<&D!B5p_xy@+!scV}`~OsK?x(xuiXEc&Ci79|(L|ms`z-gUL-8CRgd~crzIIXj?gy#dr_x34n1lp%x zzxb2*-aZX*+Q+62-F_#h_x9P)jsg6H#mz_mulM$);65QU_#K*P-~F%m_PJhiKiR>* zaG-6UoZj1)VdCRJ&o8>b?~!()^8b2oAL;jkzkTWkSx)cm3(nJ;o7{gVy4QUEe|c}8 z5&W`qRUdMCZ(n-QzRdsWg?7d~;$CuYK-wT;J z{@@p_@pY4&-n$nZUz$I;zxr0*+CQiF?x`m7^~MO^wTR_kitpW{@yr;&<96fS!oSEY zg1;e0^Skhn#v{bzP#18Le?9KVCGj}a1DwV)Li1yccpOUa)uVX&$-2ZO?(;RbxqTE* z;Zegv#rNvbc+q%2pR@gwI9_JRQ~OIRx9|$%mHA#IYTpL_FR@+vA_VtnfU;{G6eYd#-vMzq%m zoaF!L@}{6@FTJOU?6rdb!>zK0oa|Krx1-!vb!aoeUbzePG(M$Dz1~Of)noCk!0*J< ze5K!G*!6eK%Tk9p8v@ruMLM^0<@H%dWZ<#&Oow`!e-|#4`w$}FM&KlW;YZo1Pyx3F z$xFUz{zfj~7BAnAkpA%n6?a0^690$U<66YW*9kpzAL`*dvAaW4IgkD_e##G6H^6tJ ze1ETZL|6(jc`5pf?r$J}9q#w@MrjbA`9nE_&u`rw?yu+n#TS)<=U@L(Px8P6_ z0#0#a18>-aj|W2qTz{1JpZw9yc%+w1&HKyrCqvGKGCKVAemUfQ_GBKXDS&%Wp1s(< zXE=D|1;)4Fxqq@-ahKa=99iD2a1fK1jIRdYhVw@{@K0YmJU=2Skk9(-LA;v5%lmzU zWs%6s40mIG+JQg+?##F-0e7OF{86Cemb=jcPS?k2emyE!dV;t{*sL}>d-`P2kV~>IE|aOgL{^^KDwdb2wul(i}KNX1pVVd_eaA{D|iFXg%8eU zxKC&OvmxKRz^h+7ZnDzHV;_clQBV8XVW)pOnOneB z_XF)8`l{o3_C7z7*8!(^?iDp*srVj0BXIK14_z%2={Sd$ccTP z6Y_K(z=Q81pB)!T9&kID8Wtz?`)f208XuapPpW1p#~mtueVE4iNoxCl#k{14J`+mS z&EjUt<4k`d>Pi0FnI}$!s{QJH$929uAItYcN$+|7bAZ2D^Ku;>?{YRj9~|uGRPeuT z@Y{z_fz*B$C#t~+G{epfmj^5ow(VYa)WS|-iqX?!UUghdW+FV*{DzkcU* zejc0f8e_vQi@4sy?V~)fqGa?nnINwQZbJF)@mpnxfF}mYH~sS1$57yG{4;;=2RsML z#s97BB8MFkeAqlrg}wB<5~<+#9{!glOifH)GXLqp&j9b6ksE7;gU4|7LvA1WFZ|fm zctsX2Gvjw~X#A&@=(uLzHCu7k0vlfwAF?_C9;>v(NqdzVA!TXD)kseCSd6+lwFH@nQTM zcE0S&Beq-e62iyCq0jXHd5bBF4q0*MAq>wt@qhi{_onu~`&G7|u{nf$4jHBCf8OCs zK?b-}ig3pZsQO)0wnibmHIk=GV{ra>EhtFg)<8KmCus{Ptfi+w;nA z(0&Nv-iL1t^VKJBe7XLVr`~3G=>vcJpZ4G@&)$9S4ty`em^k#A{-u3aeEq{`Zuke| z&pPq%`_k04pC5NtKkerbK1&$pcV=q!VN1W+K>x<`{FD1Sd-e?UjEjq;S3cv5&@bMu z^XdM!^A4I2_kyMT#>e*1{v-aH_Jf=Lc*(Eqb!Tcw_bF*V^qarVw8Nu+(fniou+@{_ zs<79kafGvfSl)8sdV5`(ML7Gf!~gzpt-US{Av_0coLhVUg!G92?7z57V zgjao_{Wsh1%0m|Xa;z0zgx$bvnvP$7>pI`}2}0mgKk>v%^;7P`tX$p{~oo=s|3B^Uo}6j_}2MNTU!3bFuxBY{G^+IKDdbQ4p z|M^@+3E>adeD5mT{}Svne>WZf`dhaD;ooR`2*0lRvpTS2)b>9HKHI~yAO3SUJN_WT z)48(F)V}b#pb+3j%vdMy7pe)CR+?Oz_@C1CFH zi7#$z*=PAOe=d$yy=do8xTNV$L;sJj@7rVhPyb3yI&XNm>gcc7<(H;D(s|PEr%ko} ziy^!l*mUoo+CDD*{O;Icle4e+(ht2b{0r~=^3%5cJi<%B)sHOrgPr~$_`x?cozs5& z*~7N8@~0c^BaHB67rouTy%in{$T*&?5|Sm=bmHN-!#HYz(?NSc=QhN&znDCya=G53jR&=;g;aO z%{#`~lPQXP6!N@(5r%x{ErXba?;MxkIF|OUjzAW$e(uQ zL6=Mle^kDJ`A!l0+6Bn(zWnjsb_x0Ar9X^9z681AJCi5v3OSkI44t9%nDdL%9$$FL zA^oKr#F7ag6Ma+jhvWNAe>`c)qJb|Q#_%}8Ilo$b#_`ua^V|D>i14vlgwGL%`DJg| z^}gqp9JW^emiRgU@g7V!y!+>k%PzR&t>eq#$p87mFu&7V?h4&lw_mUPE$JJ^`ek@P z`}-xQytO~)*Akw7NymMT&zJsn)A3_bZW11POVh{k`3Lv>Y2r95ymm_sk3#OKpT6eu9;r+P~=d9EIGIZ`|TbZ~hb= z|6=R;fPYKQuCaf4e>e5FUO<^XKASCr`2KLk#>Zhu3)F2QLHkn+hRJov7r@1R}o8MmbsK7f1+BmD9`o;_9WnaNM|IsT-08RyK^a^Jf5hLEvQ%%{s#NpZ*1& z(s|64r=EL^U4Fq~O*iYu^c#PFr0rh`cEgZ+z5nLJJ}&(n50;-YX^JoX&|~?W_WmFK zVB3!&yc_uQqb|GEPJbTp=Mnys6NY}cjg>!PZssQTab_JcfLE{Db^kH=ZBZAzT*q{t)>bG-yvUu++7Es ze{?0}OnCV_s2u-p-sP}A?f(3xbz;eckBRR72ft{W$PfA1)fS+glcV>RO{K(gqoH^0b&%-|bd-0cFy42?% z!Uv##&K)oBclng`Iy$UkTw) zoH+A`TUy~9A9z3d7jLh>)s8>>PtBJw?5wYf{@wOJi0~NjJG1uw(pHvzmTwsGNA5nm z-_E~o=+XbX2Zpw@{ilBs+~a={!@UJUhc*^!KkMI)kya#W+_2bgd^-0I& zXCLoN|A(6XH2lB#igm}>_JatI0k^yD)($)UX~dgG_&$?6n&jTO{G|Pq&~CdCUOoMk z;5Jb&*bC2t&-vLmdZ+((TPwW0zC?eq+j}2AIo1jTp{Y+nV&-b(T zc~uE^!;pKa{Aa^&td>piF_wy)^SS3$ z5-jIfA)I66pg#bVaCz=#$f6}5IG$xz>VCvt+in~`AuiH-j>hM`IFG9wtNGIQi}9;C zUsh?A=ks1{ml4R{GWXeX`?ckHkGh2CB~p<8@VKqNu;oYV!NlSpun&Enj^jO$ul~+Y zmu?lJWkr*(6L~&cafQl9TXj4-_Ub#oGxlTbSDvon{jfU>eCWk{mu>wq_W3>XZunI- zPV?v6S7-Ox#+>fhTN6h@=~60oJ;b%ya^uk!SgE-aiO?f4O+wHk^M`L*!XL90w}4(DW_c>CjWyU)%C-`9vW9 z`{FB~ulQ(wPjK@)1^JgRDt_%_@_T}t-#w5|kNe6x$#457{=50z5BcN&aNoX?-}X=P zyJoWHaQs{J}BWKKm;aGutR;_g0KV6oZEQZbAEtmYZW7ZoGV0iRb4y`Wf$^TAk2>DaJh z*WVR;$KYNZ)@N0FD_z`AF+5cnlHgySC7@P$gpE>f(* z{4n!Pr8Czm4t!g&qE|6^yJA&dvFp2v0elyw=02t44=CmyR_uRNF){%93B~lE6>DBq z%nvJ8eFzNbesaZF#i7ZHv3)^LRUDY6m zqFA|)ViwpHQo1-rF>??Q>+$Ze()}|Pvk}FrLlnCXRV*B@*t<5bBNjeU7g%kt(DrPV~)l3C{j$$mL znEI?@wmSX6A z#r`omFV2otERIvG*+Mb4k7DJ4iUU=Oy$30V7AR&8Q|yl_Mi(m99;F!koMP%&#q@Cq zKLNNxvFaqnZahy_kx;q@-ye^6DxJzGrZ*^N&QvU3p;&X3V*Gl=!VQW8dBw{66m$10 zrhcMWcto-9mx|rLR;+wdu>_1frF8mvgue@V7&uY)H+qALL%S-bagVTaPo*mlRxD0c z?3tz*pP`tUsaP>vu{cMu@({)F0>#|ninUS2*h0mwMT!HTQw+p_%N1)*P%HrZ>Jgq) zjNrR#@joeD`;21jS>W@Ey)P){UQ`@R!m=_*xRjG@ioP6;P4enm#$HaT&vjs0OWoK{JCPyBZ|deDt0}l z7{L6r=LMznLyCj1C=P^l-y||wv1*E90XRHW>A(zx&sI#&QS6N<=8sk!u2C#}PBF4n zF}F;y@_5BOu<`_@d(QwrqnO#Kn7%-p<@5n6}x|>SoJ%_$|n`WxG!3P^oy?d!yh zgm=&OhiA4tc>S}V-SKt_m-smUCr*$6^IKilnn^b3-(shCtlAkyJeyuz@y>S>z1|9G zbNrsEro8{fUd7>RFS?`p{lmaP3r_pTaeIh>9o~ib&U;s=+QM3%$qwq(P?wl!kL%a8mHYA1vE4j6vx zmTNEF#;YFUXW%4%_?=HZ-?;ay1AnA`q{i>ZV|#u5#s&Xef2bQy`@3D)|HT8_pK4)v zY^h)W#ltVZ^RGKB{yM|shxo&5&phg$Gx|^6=!Vn&4}LxFGgB^K(p?VU*`JTsA5j0o z^cB%N7+(0S+GlQi=a^|uJSTYUJPAH4XrAA04zIrexDRZQCU!n>%St>2xy-Gpl% z_wL7Tj=gF+=h(}_-cgn7GVdOE>y2)FtS?idAFlY_?yGoTzMMYh_qEd=KmWg*zUJKr z7Jt|diRFG#`UiAocDjPQYP#w!4zAey;;(;)enh}$y;%_b@xFIGep|U-Gn{_D+p}Ql z;0?d2arNovKKmVi>R*OuUd(Wo6YIsmA$R@c;nUCjGQ<0v_p(- z_N_~PHgxbcw?6HLGya!WHQlxIpMQQh!~2g`eTFYtmAmH7w&xyYc;x{a&T@aTZPg!- z$h~xl8_se(^ti)jJ@Mf5a=$=*=Fg1T=S`nj`pko_KI32Wz_B-d{i5T&cKM0rh)N~p z$an@TwH&wo+iqQ?D$!aD!+T?Z@zMI`{~rrI`O}L0iZH8n>Lb;>q$jH#|Yhk?EWE!O;2#zkOdV^%+k6NjGf2 z{K*S0JIM{Ff3**td0y3$w|8ZDe0P8T-noC*s*{@zE{~&q`)mBHCwp#t(w6r>z4yb^ zXE^;^c5G_$glixAi5pJ;e%?R-7n!erw_Lup&V1yXwcqb6U09u}l?It$g^fJTad-&7;z;E81`Sej+@5S)!UjBA8 zDRjYKg3q2c%?)S%Y;#`i9s6H$@NsT9^Jn#n37x0?^ENp;3V8h(>@$7y-u}|1Q|gv3 zcEedeYbNh9;|~jx<@AO2^!va1w|o8b$B#_$TA0{pIQxOe#!PzT?5F(l>-AA4e(r?0HM%+;s=A6$FDJxgzVdO5?Hf6V`{?taR3Q*Yk-LxvX} z|KEP$rsdDh%JBJ#F+Jln|Jjcp_>cFm%bYs@m(=fd=6UTcn{MygrSS-c$ET=1{onq^ z(~mgtxg&CJIQ_ri=6il{*^J(o+;IB;*`^=Pd2Q8E&oex?mp}ify!6{UKHTZOaz9_O zi$DHE^`VsqU(;09XE@`(aEA{+bI`BPx{vnrQGfa$Ja+op!42Q~f*a2H-TL2bdggQA zS+$Pg(Y^it9ryenwj4WWqUoZw{_%Y+%%4+t-Pm{g_AOyIoc_&i`)&26U1rR1!E{&eqiUqAYwzdb17CKKKpFMpUHaSJ5_s}mio@u$~LE54xn zBU#wHe_H66WrsdkPG>Lp{NC2~AI9GLd*AoU^|T-1{2tYw5ASzH*MIMQw!|UrYzW~g z!ym3rnd^Xb^Fe9K35;OobklKXL~Bv-!Z!; zk$#-vAdJ(n(i$M;>H&VX>AM!^fWWquZLkdi_QT7eBp;zxkWUc`w(|Gpz}) zq&p9P27s4L`0DqEcOUn+&9>+DR3feUNPD5lnh)Uv>Yk6)?tZR>Zv&neP=duiDF z(@y)ZUV3h=H@dzJrvK;-uuU-#Pg=Gf!C zdNFC+3+$)q9eeKH4~C98^e+;=IrhATn+ThqZ7&9UuiyIEHD?YT>&-7W#~z;xaP8$_ z?=O89bf14?U3tHN^^@zncNQNuyyx5}cX0JNUT=Hr$#dTNMe=<&oa6P*e|~Y?#rM8& zy&KN{eB~|^zERtDLwQ}p_}QNx{?z4Hy}10vIQ9GY@we||c6w~`hMt{QmBY96hd;e! z@Ynz7z2QQJR~+FFU%A_t3&}^H_xe&Vzn%S%`y$_X{L(G!2dSS&IQy3^rW_G_b<>lt zFnj>}Pwc-!myJL9+HJqw?1oeS?8h(uW5u^0c#Pq(DOzu+KmYLKHoUy@v{NNq%A5Tv zk>kSJM0$lcsWEbrjx3&E>4v>4W-YwyC-1!MjZ0#OdPI&Z&8@B88j1e&L4OdKzUG^& zj!Iv#9m4|$sJ|R{PTTXtqqlf_@MjDUA)MpRpC_C<>B=R|hcG;faE?1?-F5F^@{xzj z<3SwZk*&1c4mszV=lkxdSwj6R!s9z@_+F3HeCeIDwm663IfQe(*|7E7uT6OFVlTOp zPuXL+U^g%i z8~{eJe^&{t1?GSSU=bL=zElVp1!jS9U=COS2C#2a1RVk$1;&9{U;&r|2C=Ua2j+nT zz!I<)`wQI1$bjwv4g&jt!@x?cvm?M-U;s0del4%FLC1kPU=~;e7Jvb)FGIj6 zFbj+WbHDmcV5$(|B_kFybG2RBLiR>f!5L5qq{QivLI%PL;5I?V7p}qAx@^1NvipUSFQ2WD< zJpG{_Q@8kNs&oez8+^^2giBO#N8? zm~D|~Zhm*;{Iz1{Ncy~dLVxSliy-!^ZN9YMU0|P>LH+9m7JwyS2>BlY#(*hc7MKSX zfkEVF6qo^a1ABo5;2^LB3?ZEnV9ZH(1pcKgzDeJE%s(Rg(#PR%7c7w;|nrX<~?RTu*34pgSO?Q-1@;MGQJYpNeSWP&xApf z#_~_>%mLrqs7HwS5t^mxp?n0iEhqZ4>$VH>ZNJ5C26ial4ce9yyD{*4f#RC*c}_pz z@b4NWefNOBrkv_PK>P^I_NT8Bv@Iv`eINStmwu2x*|A#-JCsj@w&lcb82m0E?bhz3 z?KZCVk@OXzPx)ccww&k(=V(3<>Bj)}+am}ke+LXitQX|(0Y1ko z;fo(B=uSH7Is-u)})P2ilesyBY8YfMQ1YS&To! z4u2W^pudz~3H}UW;3s}m&GWaDC}>+w;yWJttZ!n%=6f4~mfbAuP`(GWEhqZ5;OBv~ z%jZD`9sXHkH4-;{*Me`?4@qA|#Gk$pXj@MFI0yQyZ}fxwg-Dx#*p0&uwjw4dv7_}8MJEBgz1@>yTRj`-0JeaaU>+j0`$F!)5#7k-}W z#?Siuf!~UN`MLGz6=er50}6;AG3Zl11=^OA_@0Fx^G!&b&-tnF#cnU`P`&`#mJ|If z_=7;&t--ymz#;zhO+$v!U&_w_{~=-ECw_#XPx%_qww(AuefldVY`#6ti`_2Rp?nUs zEhqYM@cV$Y8^*bR(c!-~$~g5p_(vmc0^&#TP=7yA1=^MqKWLZ!(hu@&zr}6}b|{|( zZOe(>DEK`<+U5PGg2U%JiRD50C(1`b+j62G0KXO}`oiy8qWxUf;h%tZ#(s?3APW;#b`mCR{OTImik@6dc9m)q6YI`=ZIv@IugE5T0#X*a$t=6?=<{V4V5i{RfO2JjO<`k~MC6+zo_ z;>U(j>Jj+|(WpVO8#+?+iS;M~+LjZ$!-y}2a4{qN*hEcV#^G}vL!>;PgYR|ZZ^V3< z>7)E6@Xrtie&Y8a^eJBgZOe&&H$k826B9Py?hnLnc(Fe}YCzj^qF(`i97wypxJTXP z@E;$i&eLDYzYMmz0hZQ7eL!`;ztwoS$>R< ze7nCByMY>ic~^qA<;3nF;tM03b~AWxpw{8fM~2Z~$}a(bFJa&(esn>f@;T79ocOT_ z`fmEjpGl(z#cmOHC_fC^mJ_>u;0KS<{17w34;-oWDB|!R7^Q#yG5FUxex#t!^kqTY zauOfyy8RLP_IgRuSAZSL4}!Mk#BLAxB_Pws`|y>Y^QZeJI7)vhe=iv8o%Gc}pYn0g zww(BJ7X(-yv`hZsj@=yWP`(eeEhly};12+4H;i-dVTa$2ev$rCz7za*$B(LGHGe1{ z1#QcTAJk`gxOOKycC)ZU`5w@=oY<`eKM$l`KDRUI@Gn9?;PzAG&vX2!I8M_?`4DJZ zPW*^~Poy6uoS(%JPJaC;^Zm2HxBD5X&)v{xKKFvQ<;0KEq0f53_{g8*q;Cjz%JNGz zy|$d#EkLdk;j~+Ml=cHrhrfQ5db9!jWsVl#lNV|PlpZ7X`TnvNE zH_BfQzFm$|j|QPn`4VVbPW-qO`jf15*!=x0zSs>f^S6^4(6*fDSAZV}(%<4Ztw&uB z|NK$f$+h4=;rP)9eWq^!v@IuoTsBHOA>ZytC4Iq|rjPZg3bZXJc83sO6yZ!?{6I}# z%Hcl-N9ix+p913|Cw)E8r+gl?Ehm0F4gva0yX4#LO43(?9m-c6uj#er#BM+2LI|hb zids!yjl(}2{Vn~a{4(&@IO)qkpYq+HZ8`B{A@n&u&@TBi9J>RsL-`@lww&1Q1wXLd z-`*>5udK@9ZyY6k7l412<3}y@nZ7h=TTc9-U6u#aN4`DZm-5TQ4(0nn+j3&J3;ZIG zc8j<_TycUw-OEPl$Ik$NA18eg=resW(6*fTaXj?tFa03@Xvc0h>`=ZJv@IugQ{WeX zv|Ge{b;#jAGD`V91OBd#AC)UKf0({7Xj@MFcpUolmwu4H(6O6_9m;osw&lcb4fr`A z?dEY`zu)209{r^}{k8jNsYk=mr+n~4O|LB{e(VJQ-SL6^$xixWutWJ2Xj@L~R)L=d z(%-7_+Q0NV{Ecvw{!;!*FrIY$7=%9MOQ3Bz@#9 zz>foIw=@mopTmD}l=all!MEGDlwTk8nZ5zgww(AuyR0AdgZxEK`hqJpeUz^PZOe(> zA;cF&IPDg(ub*=G4Fa?$<@2CzIq~Bm=+R#xZN5Ek7P}?bp?pQH zrq`Ae{eH-W5Kg;!+$XGY__vJGzmRYHEq-L6&-8VJw&lbR>a)Jl5Ax>;13$4l06UZ) z0&UBQ-CpnmCu{n}gz))(k}8LP_&AM({!)Gk_*-kR_rLg23w_F`LECZ?-$LlKJZP8v zV;sAA*r9wsXj@L~c7b06(r$WdZGRP?_ow^)QRdgkA*MoBny4Y_kgzL#E(4qMB1%dr1g2w@nf%1)>8+9zg7(3 zCw^3{()2T*L!fOr@nfG+)>Gs!qEUllHx4^&uNly`oY;+k-whNq!cSqn(dY1Q8fCoP z1b&m_#}M?HzQC!PURzG$qg~bu`a!-u&P)2DutWJ;(6*e|tpq;}q+PymqsQSd93_3H zfWK=wA)3$q&?mbH+LjYP7D1o>(hu^dIQbS@t@%Xx2xwbQ><%No7{Y0n@2ki-{98sz z-#y^(=J?SIeWtGf+LjYPZi7DS8~q^vM8|F*uIZzEC1_ht><%KnFv4lKmiO-+{vBx0 z^q2B?g5U1=(FJ|V=Rn(X;s^Cv9R71byanMV+SCmJ>gy z&wQgFiz8`3fh(vy8-ZPfwWtNbx+peuZI8hm-6-CHvt92k394#-w)cB6F(Br z+tSjv`G;G4v0Krg>7#rIv@Iw4MZ_0DxR?<>pUaLreAX-aOZioZ|4N{M_|Xl0%J+h{ zzp$Ug>gu-|g| zwtev<27St>K-+Q>Ulx2K?bd{`|Ka$-a-vKL#B?N~8Euu}0HNq}>4WBaCqJ zpFz2>{K$V347OY0iyv|5Q$7RQmXrK=6#{O5ME*=Mh@aT)gB{8bfVSntZa4TtKrtcw zBF?jdDSvsthB)Xi}Jy1aWh(e$8wV-V|iSK>rv3?3^^I49<7rQ;ML-{;tTTb-T z;P(S*H;a2HC5QjsIFb11efFKOe{qurd;g0cp(f2ArY{28mh;j9yYyEK*nE5cUF>FH zhw|N^Z8_18f!_e%x)(VU*I%N2l=C&hf$w?F+TF``KH*7!Y<`&LECbY zj!N*;K-$gXeS19)|LsxA>0R)bhynb>kACR0oQj}rIq`#b>93fu`Fqi*L9rV;UGt6d z5zw}r=no^l7{Y0H2=|aO4u3TYg8ovT{L>vjdZADG0%%)K{GdMlb?w^gYOh{2`_oqm z+LjZ$gNQGTaN6yer2TcR!{@#>k@9KmZ+AKJEGO1a%9GE2PWa+?AM`0d0NR!lzlXpl z(ryUvF9@#H^ppSoDD&y9QSa=05kI2PXSvjZw&lc+4`A2zkNjiB0sO>n5A0Ar589R! zyJ_(Ifnq}V{n$4sIs8S4gZV~z@_DWyeDNdH;_o*iplvycF9tr5c6;!?=?ucjpFc`I zlYfB-;wOIeLZA6u0By^OAJlj2KlygM6}y2}r~ZSs<;3nF;tL~OToXRuCt2(8H;vN1 zZv+2oCeEPv(FJ{`F9+I|llX3dzMDSs?eRnG7Ga0-!=P&pVz&T0lph3b%ZYvu_$8p|3x5#v z&B`3(FC`uQyQ`-lPj#E%;2GktN;ww%QG+fn)f@)y&nL9v^I9rgo#plvy^n*o0S zC}xCTz;hVG4*wa{Bl=7ESHb_TFz^#Us@gPvC?5rF%Sn8+OMk_L&7Vf22E}d`b|~Ki z+LjajTJZBg+O5L-LIxfFiP)z_a=ci@4*B-{MEs~|*Yr_71lpDp{RsF(`Vl%v$H6$l z$v_#2({rJ>LCb%D0!#EP<{xsEhlz+!4GWkw}&|1_fzHY zIUX_JBucSEzMX&KM=kUzp9XEqiGCOOMA}U)*7D9fe%ykzGT$hF5BNU@3Wy&?=u>_e zv@Iuo+y*`7n~*kt7QzL@ZsbhOH_FFA+j62G1V057ec|)H&)p86^CkLAd6u8O{t-V4 z(5L($Xj@L=n=FRRkN(QvHlO{V@WpQB7yaoAgSO>Fzl8W|5Kg;+u3A8OIcJts@oaOHadhy(1 z*x{cr%Dj?%yM9Re;?QS5kO6JWi67nI6Pdn2ynn9G@#A3l!F;3qJn*k|@?!}4W%;u; zy|$eAF$?<4H`*nCzGF8EJCv^lZOe(>O7PP_+8sDa+eweZzY!T$_SYzgotwZv-|?d# z`jjt%w&iSnw;!P0DURLHIsSei0@{`nyTgbthH$1Yg?;vn!)O0A-ilA`kZ+F@QjdC} zPx%69TTb)`!6(v>VLaav$olK~vQg^M$>5)0`6qsaq0fA-0d32PAIC%AK9{lic0VI_ zyI_a%IncJ8=*PkD12TOvyho?#@K+(j=r85T-{7P#xKZQU1Iq`$~ZapG@FUM{Q zb|{|(ZOe(>DEK`<`WwK0Wx?Sejd)luC{O+#jvpoHQ@-NMnqFH@{0M7md1s(c`EJm*ocPfTK9P3wcu(bk<3|$;j^#)BGr-td82E`Ffph)k zT?yKj6F*LezUv?Pi)qxL*sX;f%BMlwa$+|Oeiu;82)}^&L*C)DeiWcj`9aXOoW$1&0hR~tlE1{UTY0{wkMd#Aww%~4A-)=f({6DA=6??Vlu`QI z)!-lQ_>qG?)7J;umJ>f#L7)8#{UG1&N2UCRVTba;uV{L0Ik7tcxhjOyF26?_bNCOy zQTj{yN5SCuCVcTD3w_G>fVSntk6%E5gJK-+Q>-~F&le`%NeMFl&mD6+z@#rwc}96$JeEF$G& zc+R-rkw0XVcC`fjO=18)$-iOfvs{7~YChO<;@=|ZGoQtT&A0n=u^WRO%BMiva-v@a zeilf(z4%^Aufx9{8O(g9Jo$SF13&R&5c-rafwtwukBYBqx`|>!_%WR8h7nHwfrx|i zG?&l)5aEj-ap+S%1KO68_`1O-(ryjL`98;wH;^!vALZW$-|ip9k0I!n3ss~seLfZU&5H28gL;t1uMEMA4TTb+c5nl}9qA&cw1np-s4*#rC<}r7Ie~}o# zPyFbGKGRnKZOch~7eJroAtr3T-S3Lsz{Q$A%2$H6;q)kBl=z>1emji9fi63u5pZ?Mh@)tOEi?BoaVbHdm*zE&9c!}l*?G9qy5pnoq zMrnULfp71#NcvLHXZo_BZ8`B{>rvVt`7@pL6<~+y8w733iQOLXOF*Wt7W)sCm-^E^ zd6fFOANb20KWd=Q^uf6OTL zb0_dS9Y3nNHGi1CC}>;GE5A|d=hooQaO`GbhvnA;+LjZ$wczK0OkdY5ZGVFf|H@J7 z=hfi5{dmP?{`7@F+j8Ou?Xo=R2l;lnNWG844&^hTZ8@`=ZIv@Iw4mEfm=qA&aazH8Fs z@GrzXwCpeBF9ZJ|F@T@=(GPvf7eU){65lZR?)z)P_%1}~a(_R-_)u-U7{w0xd(jDl z;ztbnluv=S^g4d*3WH1^^fp5Jj<&{;=51zz*wCH)vZf-gFf?_evogsTd^DL@we|P(6*e|9YTCjgwt*X zzT1&<_&*+{-aQQdIZi(JK%eQ$gSO?wj|WGocjVjcMbcM-9p*>H)tX*gPVDwWE`)HV zZxHvqY8*c2D{#k4jo2Zd@kxOAk%2ztyFuG>qTdTXk$!aJd9ne=k2#oUG2bXZ5B!UT zfuHyh_=dlISAw?X#1HDTKN1r*->&~+w-$CNp9XEqiGCRTE+FmlJM4Lff7>YS{nPX zC{O;jjvoc+Q+^P%Ehm1Iz$emf5$}7d{HCUde4hW&uFK!Y@uLR%l#he9<;0H+_(a+b z;(lSy@#8WWq+QCBZ`+sh9&r2^8pRLlv;4%a=vQ6qFW1rZ1CWaX=~pGb=a_Q%SC3L} zIlnnb4B#hz^gy5WHV@jCll<%l-~Db;0PmSAIeuI|iXT^je;u7LD1L;#_`N_eBmCUwwEYY?{4vNd<{Rb5gK?+hN8mbt`YJ)& zauVM-=+j@?CEp$&CEsdchw^FAww%}vgWmKJxcLxPaIlh8@ZWZ_xDGa$`;CHv@IugyTKm<(ry&bB?iCk zPxr2)q;Eg)*E)Vgq0jWyg0|(vkIB$ye?dRUxBErOw;tG`d>*tdCw9}|_XBA+gME~e z!#@H3(_hN31mE8G7e7KbY5q_?0@{`nKTd=`%Y$~wx7(}O&A<-jyFuG>VmAhUFOYV_ z9RD2ts!__X6Z|Cn6c9fGH~Z693EGwuKWLZbK|jd1{T92mutWJYXj@L~hQaRw(r$i7 zjDHUQ-cizbKlrza0sO>|BJ^2)!=P4i$XV9oYu^ZW>`9}E|Xj@M7gW#ut zv|G#hzr!Ct%Kp=~;Q!e1qX2!TZxFOCCw@$XKFfoCkZ+#{N%|^#HGPy1gSO?wZVB<# zAe?sNyI}lt_+K1l{z5*-E3qSfg^!FSL9hw$CLKF5!3 z$4LwyeUHQT;BVAm?|<=Q$nhg^o2J*66F;cWd=mpU|6s>%6m}?I3)+?w{YvoDK-wL~ z`FM}RpEOE4Spfb`jvxKdXFeA}+j8Q^uFz+@rXS?n{j=m-=yrcU5CLt=iQQqu7ehGh z#&HiWPl)oN)yPpw1dZADG0%%)K{1^n^-FNN7xkKO%e?4CegS1OOjs=7B z1>uVyVdzu72DB|FejE(})(hGt|3G2jCw9AFhw?elww&0FgWm@f6T+`Re_M3;SHTbZ zOZn@;;Jiop;z#g1nm?4U0&UAld{;xjtw-c97K8YS-4yIlJ`38G6T4CHdw^m>_=7Wa zJSjN*-QWlPrTk1VwucV_;ztSkl&`o`(`(B~e0xBE{?ab_%N)BkutWJcXj@L~hQQAN zX}1FJ&CfafS4QdQUIqUY$BzN%Gkrs#Z8`CS`fj?(pW)c8%KP&v3fh(vy8-ZPf#vj} zAILiVnTUt}Ql9HHyM9Rd<)Kgce$cj@_`!7o+Y{}QZ?AL3ZpC*seUuM@w&lcb5%EP3 zPP<*$_lrCHS#Xs8QhpH__Bu)Y=!QP!dqLZB;>R2au)fhQ`SXN>MT_(6XueIgOHh+<0w;y&W zUj%K-iGB|JVW5~1ejNAhLw9MukpJEB8WH_<`4?%h_rIhs27St>K-+Q>AMLWfxpoh7 z?DoPAYKgi$7NyjkkQa<>7%@c#(!uOVA z4*%Uz>dSlJKjrw5h5i`udqCTA;s^EVFa03j?uRAc24RQtCD68<*v*4q@dJOo$nT-$ z6n6M`jWQlR3clUm#E&@inZ68YTTc9V0QzjdOdt97JkP5autWI)(6*e|?FN4cNV|g= zZ-e*v)15>)&|k`*4n9#x@goX-%GZLn<;0IQ&}VrFY4i6(xPaL0fgQ@{LECbop9a4l zDEh*W;yWiLhkqUFAwa}EdGeW`!WTb6eVRX%kASx2B)%B1mZ(_pc+xaJU1NUnBC|?QMmJ|I!#1}?5?N;Hv47Cn_ zA{?c^l;0MNXN7^E_|XM@%I84aa^lC95TL(e!sZ`NqXxxp5q2m)4BD0x{XX!6_xamH zFW#>narkE;9@YyX#SZy5AzVQGNI{?SSp`99FL zoY>8PKLDh^H8@8ccK8=#9{}!nv5Fn?xA!>upZHPrLw`RI1#QcTel7S!`jMKc{XiDs z+Tj?GaF z&s7Z0Q!D`oB1-4yD@H!6Sb2!zFmUitrTZ2r_8g`dI$W_A*cDYewNSC<2*m+lev#7M zM=BP8xy4Fnk5a5S8gjsNjnc7W6vLlW3?8dk0%nd=x^{_TWT|2Sm|LcFHl`RqUNO2{ zF?51rV1;54SU6GX+)0Yrm5T9N#pub3q0cJ@PEqUvroNzb2{^Dy>HMjR-K!PTam83d zaS+&7r*u!fVx~c{HmMkCR4f2%)+k+-QmklF90KM~Q@Z53M}0n@EY z$I^=7GZceuiX~vCUFq5m#Ym@OeNi#>CB>Sv6bFF$ zvz6{XN3k-iI1C)zsC4|xibKHubCvErPqFKK#ne|6Yc5c%>Qc-Di@?H#ko&6Q05E@% z(%t{1n7&vsc8Oy6QpI4mVhK2KnbP^MDMl_=EC6#?C|z}>V#U`Lhk%t=DV+mmdz6k} z4LM-{H(%rW!R${+!7&!PH<@aIVs3)&<2KxfF-%~nr7xeE|%mGv1 zSGwj0idFY0R`e-$1Jm~^9lK94e7|Dwhl)MG&;v@d|ISn^9kKYP|9)><^xwp7K&RVU zJCgMs$%e(54zL2Dz}PXB_v&~w{1dge)ASoAZ@2i$M@2@)gP9N}R^U0r_+hFyfbY;n zuGa@SDR8v%`;G@fZUFib$OjJ9 z@E)x1YmQL53s}TCcocGdkPG2Es}+#T;yJJ2Y}L;ro*~R{v-qxA5$Dd`xPM*2bt3#L z;CaRz?uQg{kD?#%Q?CLY!gC*S#GAqU00MZPE^w0i5k+_&`vy`hGQL+mq~%rv6u#7h zt>h2$BXVB2G_f|>o=(&!HQ4)K>OpQQ>es`H^J914miyh|-nP359~%bW*!F&VUi+=j z4mM8ms+Z`;5MJt2e;4d}#i|E?_4~U-Sp3;e)dED;&ldXAK2kBoUK;kgfxo`x{3ZXK z`u)Gd-aC839x;w`8Q4YRkD&e)ao;_KdX`5$8jz-cK2;@|>4Ta;3Zr$d4ir`7vs{Z)mMQ zp`)#-Wz9(T1|)yk?n^(@@_su1kMuJ~U3>xUeNp}}KjN862A0*GX1bA3dwpv<8ES0G zB-=wBsbpwfvTZ}i^fC3x_V&>FRBL-ORNvat(Uvf>P3@sXd%FopHXLGcThg5!p7PrE zWb-;>r@f=8xjEF9XjzjCwHkw=gdtlJ9i457=Jx3!IAFk=UvnS!=cu=aFZGQ666yB| z;&4N#K9Nq;H8nSNYzVDsYwc`lXb&~D)HioFBtyxJI9uPGXj(fp)aoU3T6;QK-_+Pt zFA3;eo9<|8ZE2rsjI^}2G}R}XLy5MIruxq2gam{VEe#=KqEq-@deznGDlcDxxM~5lcsU~8^+uGSt-?}!bt{8!I zqAk&pY~ElL>s#9zOa?&0cFW68wwHYW=H=%KQ|O82j%1rDpr&<6_;*@sQ%grE(a`E; zRcL)vM~hU5x=vFIOkpE;&P=wohU$_n$;PIR8TGC09ihfVQ?phiPuKX_ZjxQ!F%42E z4-=8?xYUE8n6{IeU-9*Jl5Nu$uWM>Zw$vx5 zAFZ`wE67bpE!i(UGt{0+RL_|knw?C}o83?!nLBgdtVqNVa~kH(s+$v@H*?zLbxltnsVr73)yaAFb@ho^)!}5a zer99!oW$H@q`DR%B*FxG`D% zKgLqcwERb7ne}gr1#Lmfy9W0l0{`tV?-s}q*MeS=GTl#8OJlOlG)8GiBe@+i1#fDU zw5#^cdg-}Z+d}IS&7G!WYinKW)!1Yv-P}~))DddwTx+E3O&^zB+hlq-Q?*m3Et!hh zo@`s^bpYk6DSn2rFJ5}Y?`JFgBGO;a&qP{c)81rlYeTZxcy5}QiBlSnY30(eq!DZL z>PVT&x+Y~eEi`YDmNsM>e?w?ZtLZ;YJ8Lm*Dq#$k`%>|f<6_S*{eE(vme^?Lr{~*& zrpHdMO_*FY-D5+-IMx=DM$}RW((Hb&b?=REYqA*Q5%y89i#+wmGB%k{5zSiuo{P`3|zeilXnf>6pgc)|sD6>pQ zl=c%kggQco%#U;}UItlx*X%?%Ie%9DyvVHC$=S)qxz&v`tLG<^v*%XNtZ$rG*Eq9& z{w&iuHbmw&&TpJKdrrg5IrFO%4fTeqn>%;@tkEJUcU%9d2+BRyzZ`*A+EOlY%=arE z^Op>YB|=+jJc=Pmwu~=?;kK+Alf zy;CQLW~fg#H%b#XJx*u6&hkR7>sw6xb;(9E>dr_sN_WwgT-PL38N)kkw8Y5)=@5&`jqM1%>qYyBaVoVg7R;W>@7>gR^TbLtayv*sitjp1@(Aqms{ z@szXbUycVAQR-p%Gg=Sxzw_6_V<1DU0liT69+KXA0<(HkqcF*^)X6ca$nUXUzQM2}GH?v2xQZW;#wMkj=VXu!bl8-F<6MHKp69o3dYPx6E)ub#-H8W+XX#_T0INIf=U2)uuBG&r8&Y6Lr;d z=g*&4Juh6}Xxif3+4af!iTXLS=b5f;Zg_5Fet2HP%#YNaPbY|XBS(A&h&O<7rzn;jan{xNN2 znzx#o;f<{`${V5eX5DP+=K9vQX0r!w64ulvJ>_Y}SFa^X1M6%wO|i+0<7HPpKlj!A zi~Py&=Q+qf;@O}VnvS={+o&+>ycQE}y*D>79IqfK<$l8w#DOw&5E#XtQcGaS?I&G?)Qo2`fB-1&`>+4VE) z6SEtVX4Ye7HP!Rx%uiOEz18~a`Ewc@>#OI?YnUI2%s2ZMb0Q71>+0(DG)>Z%uhMeq zdB$HZ>~D$ecNfYcx4czoibM9}buo`UJKX@oiG!)VX02~F#ag^(Ap8Ewc2hSD-zykq zwU>M156`bMMZZ6+7ewAmGwXFdqtU9{TG!mP#v2vP`9`|6y~*3uH_LNxs_5;~wIoHr zG(qExnPHl(1!F*tXiScqwY=G_lA7U-6W(sbv~d(=;C| zp7s09Luz7sxqdg89>Pp&rGb09h2GIaxzdlE&7h6iM>JE7D{|Pw-bFWiy`ik3vn^@r zGnCqrXLL51CS$io?a%Tn)Zc>RFZW4_Bm1Svkln28p1@>QM^k%wx75ouZ`Zc1!<0g~ z^YG4Mzq}Q)#(*FYP5^TDZ5D zZ>pZ}Kn#6?FZ(>dvN%_$eZil9o$!Omb|Ze7Bf+)i$V+>4p2_JRp@~*D%rz4l%!!-K z3%&d`n}lmkYII-_3r!u~CbgN{cbGFX>8(t|S%;>y)*PJFcbYAmW^037>SHbLGn5>E zm%?8n_sP9;5KJy50(01D#&|8_20fk8^F%Y^cDCs{LpJbbPTOkEpsn&RXP)>GMt_}q z(VuUN;Ro?ZyF9%P+Y}il5@wW^R>A&S8^csH;F@C$(Lq{t zEH5I7A}?@a+P`7c+1&Di`a@45WjHvcvw((*Rizb(>FcN{-) zXVa@>QV+8@CknmluZNs36FF~Qio^Hv#UIxp>g&F|lOj3dN#ppU^#2RRk@R>_?$-d2(ACwX%` z>#B*#5^u6@^3_}Rm=RFtc5-3Nnox~QxxKO444wA1KYFL*bPn%b9(Me@0{KV09JKMz zEGK1cC%Zak%H>=wF%#*v>1N%_C>O1FInZpm@RnYEDp`NJxw(;+(NcGi%sj~K7kG2D zk>!A{TFtm>HcFbz0A~IwU;QyhAZK(Y>aA(4H}4n>YyIeX-Jjnr7%z!yH*@@4YpzZ< zERl_umNjM=wTA9;N6OOxlNfV1NhaUcp!zQ#)N#01(06XThGdt4VH;^tkR{K24j}qjUjV9YO=IEW?0*BmLL3X zdcpC7{XUWX|3c~3KkgQ=>14faX)G=@YwwGOzwoj!ArXr`dj zG`Qj{Z&~P)%Gw{K|5iEkd(B;M`}1uA`fVcLllw{YVeLE2ezbM4_K_aEywv``e{Rh0 z6o=pO=ieffEAa@>GVjnl(mlqHyOSA0ufc}eZ1(!hbx5zjuxpysdwxea{jNX$(-0rA z$%=8RCeNW~w1|1|ub-=A|4Kk>_;O+SXmEoA3rWYd`*(kSbN`39 z+513x`nociI6c{7x@EWTv!<+{?gRb*xDQnRj_dpWa$kXZN<0DdqK}{5Xl28)6g#%w zNUp=TKKaF^thv-b(rH*#QR*STyIS>u-=A$T4imTD%=MHtuINz_2gTWfB5n4@7?eJ}Sez%j_7{pHHA zUNbODW1}mJ6CAuBVupQLujq}5^5WSXW}9ms-rX{}Dem3mlr4I_o^@KMc`<-@OW9q} zc;h|ZpHVf@pRNSbL5zc57?Nj;%sIPkA@PAVvvM|zNwd&Tw3+RJHo22vc4B33POloZ zn~M?a}u$a#TzDsyDZ z_0taYlbB-Cq}hZRc_D*$8^^kDFSk9pGa`QSyQSf+{Pm_0^@f-P{Ymx4OsmU{$V_Cti&b)O z;{&U+umr}gN6Rgd`H)j_9x*q(`-+pfK%6fv6&lBs*{f;?}F}+KZcSNMKGVlDOylCcy22TJTx}Yp4?c_?^*S$3H#?LFD~huV0jXglT5*G(%?jQEnX)O?K&17~+Ur zUzB6Nspicqr-a^!tz5es_QF&TALeYv?SN#p>%f2rd%Zcz&O1JP;%nuy%i$wUr0SGN9>*J zwaF_-(rr!Nd4%`c5jl`Bg_vl-0|7GKn8veRQwz++2)^n==IWZmoX515xA#5&_&vyU z(4Rlt&nI%fPyCae6z>5R`>aim0=>Ka-rdZkJODFtGJ&HJ-{bt=iG!10{C;C_2fsh8 zM?~KDUdX}JyZPHTgN4!D)N;CJlVpL_Vx_*wT&|qSyx=Ty=CU#$tEt~0XTc^{8>h8; z&ykd?m6vb)4r9*olj|trs&e}@^H>b+-g{-Rz2)6N@#d0zbBxJdyd$f+B_n4;p zqvmZ?reEPff7vmwUE)1pH9PwAZvp%u9$NN`r?_6x$>iP4S>;eb%5P+c3fple5pudE zued2k>*WXEPgZo|%_1J+Iaa*x;fnVJi&+-POSWXL` zw?Zf%$9R(#>3HRMOAp1(0lGP!ma_F;At8@j`TALYudsF}e}0__KZzSGzj2n25c>_-3uOGGXp6e`G!}QWvZ!NDam7nzUVb&&%P0g?XaEd-s%igh}2sCDqy6lP`Drs5;)7(==WY;Nsgq zMX@WA)FXZmF|~`o9!=Ol7$5mCxAw7~5-wiK zr$d!aG*o!xxWb!Maw#a?n(j4>44mQ@zdIML^yk+~Noj$*-7a3&q#3K(4R{8O}ajD(>`NVP~viw$f_e|wkFd3Jn))?gT z9DJZ|3AK^6kLYC4AOnrJHD|`!#2T6E$`uh2giR~|_&vBD$Im+WMNEJ;`Ns*U z*OX*C&nqkQNT!L-8_%c7WMA^N0goS_GgYv)&f9J}3woUimrT4D;<34S;|0IdR&@O4I+V!u=rZYR#k$#^>@<({m}+2Z zr}uI!@5Y64Uh(nSu{C-)%@#jmZUqrsQ&D;YWxf?lJ znUrsyqZGZd-nW**6x5`{>ysoOQ{HeVxhdldpZ+%8fO&_H=~m0NP3MpNE?I1Ee?GGR zBU=5Sb^Co}F6iws$j~O&;zm-&MU^*%>XjdHewQJX|s$F|L`BMaO@ccfJ{nY_@%!dKHy6nH* zS=Q=a6wSQy(DfGTDd))(_hutQ^x$`-20PE{aTfXoBG2{v`(v~Hvh3XXT@;2D*(3Ak z9^Sn#Z|I!9gOn1LSjGD*Gk8B?2Ux`W@S=DRTOIGgO5i<8P2liB zcfP5N_t#YMzL*5wYtjW)@E(u?-oG&dHu0W_Jl@AJ2G;RjfefCD?*prNK0Su#u4}*y zo-6JHOL&eqhUYq?c&@I7=hsqr?rH$6;JKw7o{Jg(#o1NC^ByTY_s|5UaE^ZfEaAL- z9Ou6CIM>_qk!{TV_*a4O|m%W(8sxg67FBe zaKCp5tm1xN9QR{7zyj_EjGo})u7>^X6!vfXz&!R#$G|G~0aMuj>H;&^R~iFb*bm5I zy*&oju%1j}z0?8buud5QE0}jDF;DCQE0~uhFb`=0(-_}Jz$(VC1p3D=`llS*J=$AM zwL9q_5@=^lMfbLrHa-dc88L=yZ*niMo%iR(^4@fieUR@7U|TAZ-p%>>qd4==8l~crbNGyK~-_fx2 zGQLM*>HKbsrFZb%6-(#$T`avF;?F3)vts%CM+L`K@}OXP>d0U}^g{g4@5|V7J9`Jq z&*42I*3VIVx7*5ThUk+BiD!Q2#>&a!`BY1f;Jpu)&hO+{I=`1=>HL0SKdU$V><&WTdI&<}f?*UnUejmuvOL(8ArME)j zir*8m{E6Lz?d5leEPwyi!TiHLgXu-|16B^dXJqO8zLBN(L;S<#YiPKL-C zhuD>TNw8fle3#0W%jb(MJ^z$oIeo;T)id|xVE)lQj&AvjA^Jo@`oj*+u~|KPkUvMq z`wDEi{O*+H=Xa4}hjfZyY?{I!sF-3yr~@OxfX4!`eZ>HOZ8rE|Z`()m4cOXqioEq#dh z?%MdthxDH@d|$%K;rC1}o!=L=^a0)rq3Pb=bL+qw=8;Wc2iOOWfYGFzZzh0gU=COW zR)BS23)lq?fMZ~6cPBRq%mDMi60izv0NcPGa0rY%*U5_mQ@|{+04xJ*z$UN*>;p%@ z=pL{imz!tCz9013_*j}(7m;vU2C14fU0JecW;1C!|!G2&0 zm<1MqWnc~11a^RZ;0PFf0qh5QFFW?1r^x|}zzVPq6%!^$42Y)@g)#=qs&lWzBw>2^lx5D+BGrZF~s}ESeejVS05%J}f zAg2br^BJ$MUvdAvdrLN1|L{AM%OHnzelOC}`TfW_I>viT&thI;>HIFFrME)XC!F_q zKA8MO|5Ql1oKIMOj<1%U2w8{lJCRyXFYksYLJQ&m{v88j`?~r|0yDroumr3E8$hy%xc2rW@ok$|p5Z+UzE*wKFrwqI19`E} zpSs&cZ$9o2$)1cXiR3UoFM+%#12u?V+^>kIr}|2MeqWOHK(zU}ACWitTV{R`mY@3y z_08nh^-CQ@f9^B%O@4mYlJ*msS5WeEe;I?dg7LRs zKK38#CO^Nw$?}O>jO6D&LVq*)!~DSk+xidFpZg1Sli!xl zc5KV%en5XS`NQnzzCrw@o3@|r(w5J4ett9gIlkEZ+z+Um{5Jl={Ks{4-{iOc3(L>- zbNs(%?YHq47XMsl=S_aAf0+NdzOI}6R)6l(TK{qV+}}+8C+Lj$TiOrT+3}an+Hd>6 zF#mBqo;UeNrvD4e&-HoTvV9roAgw=%#A zu*3cg?K%Uj06T2&i2Dq%0_?CoATBb%3b4a?f!{K~3a~?e!Y>)+AL%#7n0MtB-SgW< z`kA;Cemu_m=rfyu%-{GO^4bB;@6X%*%KaNVZuc?a5jop{naKX@ptYyT`_&I9uUUIK zR}vzx4LN<_)%*SH*?WCww_k`DFMVrw)1PgQo35==}b=rRPJ+ z&*1wYx_ptt@x{`4pU~1X*eAB-_HZA@@{h1iv;1xB?^=G|hqUx2_DwCF-}kn3eqY>0~rSrSOmd^E|rh9!xXg~kzv)1xxR7Cn!_Ali_Tt9N+ z+a6oLc2%P*osY;_?z*7}k>iH<63sLCtfa_kAb$t=?|(o1isVuEJOgqzcu(y4KO+0H zA^0WH@4s-LG@705*K#X@<2#P~?Am^jlf!*COK*k5O$YnomOp~~;Fg{`CRiWd-?#ky zj;^MQf8CdiA`v3jVF&qN8t`6<=-lT2uj?yusPj+qk)Iv4>m{GOTo^SZdxi4Yq zJO^Rvt&sjFhy6Rt&+n~TecH=H>J8(dZPz?!Vddvv9xR97bF}fxa~W0+zq@GZJg;Ht zJg;HtoR3>Nze{NCs)vl%+_$xIxQ}D$3EaQ3^udx~{}gfG*z)uHbXLzO?pIs-80Sr_ zoG9*3TKWLrE3tC;eKbqYhUm}ljahzv_sf>c?`m240Oyaa9Ddiz(mNr3<9DVke|n!_ z|MR;~Rv+%OS$Z7b|F(3V_p$T}&P`Z4_u(v^_X8|Ff&0mp&T~VSUJQwoddPU1dSbAD z+9CZ(FJyc#gv_5u#|O*L;+&V&KNT`w@jFwNKa2bSw%&7x1((b3KUq0d%&#n+-)XXR zp2Mr%eFTamu`T2b!OXoQ+OXoQ+OXv55ES=x+v2>mb zv-Hf1g6oC*!LoI9Fx$;dwpFU*-3U&3;BbWE?Dq^sD^dh?UQCf0oX3f0o_}nO{e7KiKkD_6=@d zyiaWTc}~#M2RQ#_>HO}9rME)H1%Cfx&i^>~XX#1IXDprP6K%OkoNKdm-fyvVeh0(S zd7jbI`5lTmI`*wCy^r~%rSrQImOlB;gNe8De!=aC_kpaOM993o@SNayDDM?a=Y1k8 zpXUiIo#!+yJrN6*Uklk+;rAn~9Dc{a()ry48z)VykL|jH_phv+>_NeL^1A|7KF^a{ zIs6WQrSrUnr6)t$FYl9Ce!joo(jy`5o%hQuKktKCdf~Ofe&D%~Iewf6xAYF4ue5#} zg!E%=w0A3q=VUFN@3*)0%lF7z{&L7Vi0>b_{Cp3%rStxurRPG%eZB|V`hn+p=j4Qp zzq~(Z`3oWIi%cT89&1kxrt|&ORzA=DSUTU6Z0#zB^uv*-1(#b6**D<(eXacAPQh~c z{#mPMDx_Zc-cie+=XaD%KRntaxZFs{_?QYA2a{VkIo2-T*R}fay^xka7P8OJ^V*i5 z_kFE=zR%Ipdm;1H68df1?s&f2%Hg>JOYev5BbGw^mJM0&^ZdA#&-3G!&iC%jo#)vteGpRaARVj^&%awa z`H*(O_u*N7-v76Bo|m_D-tV{cQAm7tLiDeM>`U-GzLg)}CfE-=*J%0q{yj@CgpA94 zAD-psd+97ai+<0>LvwMko_tT5m6O189+uAclUX|7|7Gb}+@G@j0N+Pt`NtviF+Sg5 z`T2Z_d!|td>@nbfA0ms{?CWZH~9V}D?hV;u$(OJ z!`O29-XklA?;W!A0^et1?vL|5JC>i%h0M_p57v{gm z%mYinDzE`;1AD+BFmkZF?-~cDfLUMxSO(UBO<)Ju2abTzS2(!|U>cYM7J(ID9oPbP zfdk+e7<(n|69Y5AJg@|;0vo_Kum>ChBe-852d02oV1abpzs~{-z%sA~YyvyLK5zt# z@_sY#D<1~`15>~(umCIrYrrP31MCAw!06%dKQIl<0gJ#2unueiyTAc(42&HC{{u6? zJg@|;0vo_Kum>ChBS*r1U<#N87Jy}74cG*BfPLTy7=0D&2d05JU=dgW)`2Zx7dQZp zfw7}tKQIH#153avumNlXd%z(ul7s!g6fg@c0L#D{unFt{`@j(}`fAt@OapVkBCrCi z16#l@Z~zL1V&DP{lFA33oHQ3 zz#6a#>;U_~5it5%*bhttbHF070;~gDz%FnA90Ow~!hT=|m~(umCIrYrrP31MCAwz-R&X1Jl49un4RG>%bPU3mgE)z}QOI56l4b zz!I;p%@=qlI`OapVkBCrCi16#l@Z~z3R=OIUTyYu+5Z#YZ=rTkQ6X@qp1i=iDv;p0#EDUaur$wwrwpzyOi zo>L|tQS*DWIsM15GkK=-a~>%9lAe5?lkbABigdf~qF;&ibDclhz&2d_>FNhTnM~mV89Z&-&xJKJpPQKkJ>(lah~U z`58aF?@vCWs;yHO@;v(06NUKoeO!GnAH&le^ia{l0Wz;R9F`}N9n+|Q=o zMB(F4_?e&giOEMKub}X=T%N}wAJOttZ=PQ#A5rsrw7GWJqyOIG{Fnk3fRbPQ%KJ}s z@Yj%T{mTBDSWdfk*aeC_v6FP(f1tiZ;p0#EnV-+olaEMVL60`qZ^z&2?8^d$Pwe9T zuo3JjBi-7?_YM);7{6lZ=ZC-y+G8H^SAxH~kl#?{%X2_Y%rCo&uGa^Ak5TsTzj?;z z-}DpzH8h@mq0dbnx%TATsi&yPy=SMtUbw*7p9dcPou}{k(C4mvSp49nFRp^_$@YKy z#$Uho*dtDPrCdn`4QWFZ8*;BfW3!36K25p7?F9otKdRuD#!U)$adw%8w;o?BR1` zL_YU-_EemG zr{DA1PajzN+U~-#DS4|yf_0t`$;9rK@BeQU zy~Iz{yA3^r9_057(yiZf@0`|`$m6-IqN0oa^f!_I?x=VT;i+pRj(4{ayp|4*%C3C;Z`4 zL;p2QUU^Gv7rAkt`iUQe&UKQe2iY@*+}OM3<5T(xJ~tt9CBOI2{}HwPwAVh8kkdUR z<39f%WKS%wN z;A=N$^~-}E=D#A+=|8Tkv_GVN*$)sIpDmSN>XpyeQLir2Tj>|f_-zEbo@YuP`AOVG zs?+u^^~!b4LiNh3{Gu1n$%uT3w*u1ZpLOdVwudU{VS3e-T+xgBqzlz+pz@1ee4dqh zjgdZj^{l@V?{)qN(<_B^kt2HX`Rj%1RaW^$FP_(@UNxkrFLwPJ{ng%#UR@phYtLR?&8|fD! z`+-A`7E9ev=I>lrbdmp8KRfgC(M4ygW!|IEwY@@6Sf=I7Mssn9`#p1<>bP&S?K$p}gpzf(T306i+e22kXB^}i+gU(7r!umh<%hZR(c5^^AYJcDNp=W*xvao z^Zr?XX}^jeSkLrB0sLi^&-Vk~%Mb^h{8e024=G>!A?W>|9`Bs~165v7`tXivJ&S$q zr#Sl(m(JR!{ouV1cLnt%<`uu_DnIc9=ijW~4ETzQU;NNVxe?IGU&FQbLy#S8CsMB1 z(Rk*3J$dvks4weB_$A)iPUKq0G23~f=KPTcl8-_JfWG`b+fUPyEDqCypS8{fY1f@i8uRy^CM@oL2e+)A$IA2gbS9SNNXaz#HKx72HhbRD;TobBrJ*N{&B$OoO> z)(+}JWWPc?qvHPB_)UUOZyX9A(}}r2zWMQ>L4Sjv`cV$+wFrMFi9!JV&x<Z-d8&A&@Fd z(w)VwaQ4?8&tzAu`o@F8B6_!O`j6^wdE*)L{Y+4QNKny%SNCa^0U3L)-AB@L?>{_y%^+oxtSLrnPlQ<+F^^ASo*`EXoua3jqEPV;( z6NO*e0ml*2IX_j!`|W^ytiKxMH)qR?&uk=q+)@_YV)@ zXZj@#KCQp-^ZmmM87D+v<|ndVrF_rNOGu~RgucmsMHui4>Q@HPdu;41JPmOJI{lyc zg!2dW5YZB6HO$BLcqQ~+0NwW^p3kHl`kmKA$d5Ep?&jvPeeg}<*%J`tpAq%Rth8SsnV!pC}||H|MiDn8#I#!nNuEMElT=gnKTGUNC1O2E92y`7r?LUL*mNT zM-TZIy6-duzxZGL!12%SJH@UJ^uzK7`-cNvy2z1wq`!$1`%OJEo&GAKoC=V7+4qo> zzZsyHw2Sn0?tZS*XTDw{pLY6A^zs;e`$N`|G4Lz({r)cURM$W1eNx>ou)P(8W)D4;THx^&YQ@ z!teb(x87?!=I%4veJ$?4nsr>H@EKQMHK54#^o`KJxZZN8(xo1l&Uon|eLTZAzrPW^ zW2NuK4^o#QSbI-ynYnd^!&O`N^|_ z=E2kPgnGrB&c3qRXA=KXFY<9eDg}P2Gtnz!%AsC)@L9e19-G;H$@%*$?ALXEFD~cy z)4KuXi2gQyTi_d6{V^VLKb`wa@oVSXh3D553GnNFQ2fB}xlmu0&ugOi&HH<9pFFI8 z5Pq4bRH08BD0H#Y#`h5EVfQInKPAe!PRI9ryHBcgDN}yhzm&)L&ME$&c}^MW+8-j% zwinLR8%mz|ncsQfIKuL~0dl1s#P@Oiysj@VhojyJ+5?S=6{J7b@p zk8ANi{Ybts5=UbOiAI68SN2y=7e@&NhTz`i(NH31-EmfY>_u%zz zp4U-yk*B{aD)OigF>=GyK2Oe8)GMaw5-0q=CGAZieIm!JFYzzqIji!E9?UQGD%Xq; zxfZ<`&%`S7*OeTxlX2ZtbdmRT5rm(}qh7?J;@5VL6+Ot#_!olP1Iwd7dXSR>zo;VZ zhISG;56LS&@f+i^qUb?>DWROE;`7Rx>;tmCsaI!~ZxRnoA0l3chL3SL;lp|{)|$qP zv`^M6`O-+I-{}YPv3=H2Zed2=be>9iW$;yJ`4%xw^Ju3z@U>?7CgTSCuLSt}iciLk z4$j|jf0X4%Zk(@wy+O92 zt54=;=g&M)mwsir?00&GkM`0p704SKKH5vZBKQ)w&ia}5QokJdvWAa(QC=E+CB-Lk z+c5D){yO+nwfOOw4!plLU9U6$2>I>)qWvBk`J-)Trzvm6fag|c_C4pzDH4hn(irks*dtz{WZT&*#e(*qWnoeMSF>T>OaFbA3qh!yJNO}Qx5%J1Yc6| zN&M7|Kggd0pDJGb6s24pKVJQ9$$m#{lKNwRMg9)t>HP)aV?NHin&9gxJ$2lXkL#1M z;`93<>}zpfh2&{&5SCPzbD_6MvmonuX`h?xDxU}+l zVUY9&=w+NY{PMv&U9^1Vl&Z&HvM{(W5_CpzhBFFpZ|A-ZpKd2ne1Gqkx%;Ja1`B#-+;z#cjh+nv_ zqhE&P|H@SFAiX#bL3vv-e_G}9D58GdBx}XX|i5tIn=*2%eRPrZlIoG zkXKiHUOjKk{Gwlw9-Jqd{gkaZPZ}$EUcb4*?r$VI&JV0tDM#XoeAJWsvT5)OpRUJ( zq6g_oJHqsAsQjWQ`H9^?J?H1Og8)9!ll2a=^~(N~dSz$%Ci_B6 zAHx5oS-wTApFHZn1HSq!-(*~1J#fFhqxi%=o@*Q`dQd$i7;kq?{UG**t+SJgPsR)O zN4#%By>j5waU|t){zkOVW$+v<*OT@fEb|c=@9bB&Zest*eRIU;a(-8HsO*sVqCD0U z&%J8>r5&)}qn*jGJHKUsQjYj#fN`vea>!oP5dzX zTvMcj@3pidff%8h)}*{kbG^lzAR z{?v=*Fn=ET?K;zbPnrCskn;Gwq0PhRzw2!!*qW_yK2a9+j%5pUD^yTZ+U)!`yr8gon1Cg?f18-UmX0}KIy;u*KGQ{ zRSEg5T{-g{6w9dulq2o0j^{(!-%a8K{XFBGNIi+dFY|#Bz2L2;7!mh;c-I55Ay zPJ>T6L;iy5w~ulQ#VSOi{uwOcn++Na)mB-P#?xmAL--IOxvwD z&MfDAh4C?>9A$v;aeO0R{5wvLV)M$K-w)1&@NwLtydwBSfBwV{>Q8&P&s$Uc!bdyE zUx6KM!^e3v%jJIX!0=H&%Hw&k=y$dMrsFF0<9V=@;iLb^$Max$!$-YXF3)*Y6rZ$@ z)Dzu)3FDXiP4MY@k^ZQ4fyNG4Shhym(xZH|O8!bnd6mHPw$phj^Y=r_%b5J+9|f1U-0s7N*_Zvk^P?R{?0Hp|R{+29=W?qb z%VRt-e;fH1I3<`brw$Zd_Zw`NksrAHT;EB4@ekL99q32?IQX@`QeI(!^P3X# z+c+ug65PJ40p*Duj0gIk>o7e|iyZ^_f%m=1KM0U3e&>5>iCm9!{X@TVJudzV%E$E& z*V|kNaUCxC#Bco0cj-P?4?+*BrzX;MJqe%f-?`4|D0zOoU{s7x!>un*Bw$`4f8s?50VGJE>EvZ*}laO{E2_L|3qYaXhELvia!Tn(cmn#g#eK77x_>^yUR|Bi7>Ig($;IrXSQj|Ncq#NQ>H6DWdC z{%(NY!r%K3>PN=Y{AT9&xgR~# zkU#79X}>XvvmZOX>3_*D^E%2W#=$px|9(2|(%)^An*qPb6a6E`F7g*CR~YdVKV;0l zjwA)eLkIcw^T2+2%zu@$kLC3P%9HvX_cp!%l=?|<{SHFL(G2)ay)2KJ`3~)(pII+; z7k>PuXE*8PE}(_DWN(mzl33ln{3KlNq5%kr~G4?AB@|3|@BF!Fex zkbKrvhAq+ZBJWW7i^UcM;D{kAG!^yK=5{_7)M?<0EcdhWi-NXd~h zre2P3-aot#lmWl+iM>4MS5$Pdm*W|+0exzU&$BP|{zFso`RyL_9a|4Q@M-;}pW*kh zXX9gP7u#j>r_O#pei5+!<@u3zPSg`}vep{Fy8FDIdM+ zlGdmG_)(_UK(F8H%D?Qyqwn6B{q|jwE`DwyopQoZ_$A(Y;OBZn=w6=r_J#KXBHyHa z#eY6qKkV<=zS2k!>+cu`5%A?^k#?~> zbKib$za{nyXZP&+!0CRAwJQmJDM$Jj_D|F+hji*iy9ThQtnzz2bNxXVd=14X{Xyva zFBG5nDT8@`6n^}2AJ*dn{gL~n^Bczz+R6LM1*8i-$j&s6Z(5ALMMmJRe`|k9B#verQhzdi8-)4}N@@@q+ak`IWO<%awH++Y$F4MGk)+@7(&C z>ooSadC0ZvXO4fw$v*IG|1{axXhDvYE%w^}sgHEsKZ(69ylx-637d`Fsrt}Nzi{+1y&%U>X z?-z^y#_1>d#b3i`y7@EhU_8-GqVS6zk)3DvGfC&VT#qYa58q3tpVt$=QD0&cdd>FB z^Uuk3z&9CiJq1J_S2llN)*hL8ON`FNiu@;j$D<*`1<$8%Om z!$dPe`?^tAQG{-Lvge$LAq zIxpgT+PDt2^CFf@yOTECvV9L)*t^{4X%Ye#oR-u$|AgmmgfJGefJKQi@$ z*unWJv5fo~#V6w{*Jq4V`Yo^c{C1yl{Zb9}Lpv+rGkUE^n1038&-}WjkNmd%+xE;j z9|e@B$6@NvacMH&^%U^>gUNn-_R*=oBtPSm`FWpCuM@rX<)W&}7v$#>(p!p8{2X>J zx1;#P&wO9My$?79pYii@dk!GX&zV0tdu{*UFy{zZuX*sB@+Qw?@V=y!C+jV?WBO0% z{E43^huDRD;gNnihxwbHcT2sn-YGZwXJ?0=UrW7mKOlj0$eo-Q*Zqm;!*)T;B40t} zmwIFSu=bS|UywXL|H1b`&`!PwqHFTgFGT%Zh-csAIe_SB8n@c+q@oAuGdZt+!%Y6= z$+d2ODzEZ;aUOZ5D2!i_Jif1?uJTDePTv2Z=pt_?3iD9p(N5w}@oRg>iZ1IJKF`2- zi2udeLpf56#0|?MUk`Fp;3psLWPd#AHw+)kW&5Z=Ud8ZH4$I~9Urocu_dt-J{Y_8t zN&RwPYOLtuKgKOF1AP*Ioz}08Up`kvz0$LMljn|@K4N_~<9{(XXvp zzRB|wL-Yp?l-r->o4aqqd41$>GxkpUahA{ZX;SftU-_IxPSJz>+JatX#V39Z>(6V7 zPx^EAYqmdcgHOk8Q2BOWO5#@9SquH8zF#PD&vA_XX8M1efAlyedUf!9xfs&PpTo7* zOUmPW88)}hY$CtC@1MZ_9oOfqpH4`5_PiPGE|~pH(pw>PyZ)VCraT)I{zZD?Y(|<)8&mC=UpFcWw`rG-k zeQz=Sm;k@FL;T48L;F$N$NXjF*YjxMqy4mt-*c#epMGdRX?CBLa@!$#^$kDkk>xRe zY@_po-9M?lFnIqY34ZN|Aba_KiG`lmtUxa9wdV_|Z!@5LsR#R90qtd+F@NMSXYWGy z731KiUMX|FiTzXteA+J(j~&GC=HjuA{5BpdCO_?Hg_Jio`#to7t@r3Zg5%%z|12*7 zer=z$&;H#mPDl?!(ZlmcqzpOMAGV(OUTwaI+uFhQ(xg0~@QGgb{4VVn2G}9-Q!(o| zTORXg{^|T?*M9|*pK*}~Km8(d<^HPP50UHfM)!VPNf-S~(OJLJKa@ihe(`G$#plO`>3`_IBKVB{lke+=^`ng64)WV^qGIMn zw4)zVUK;HrtUT6V>T%~UyWgKj{>Y^+o%~twTl>l(?UMD%{0-!{=liIy-G6L{lvltx zz0KJd`**N?738<}CBbj)i(}l~TzM7bxAR(#+Z^ZVk9tUX5pxdF#wX)#g#31VOFcVy ze2Ye2?0?@?+voi~w@%F8=={d>`BJ{ew~^<_iHzHoC!Z`V{!h*aRZex~S5e-5cOHN4 zJ9hZ%Bf=0=9`BD6g-`me7V`IiLYH>Rc_aNeM!IhI(r@rwUTl%GoB27fXMV2#?Dsc# z&Ml|%2kD9>sDoeRi60{7eNFU3Cq%Cf_`}w>^hbP&^8?S9SpCVz z^+yW))N6op_`W9gzj^Rke+{1M{H6N~uihr#jiKK}zSJkz|Fh>n=lAz{{!^DH?Sb)3 zI|k5etn85W3(F;6V(GM9h%WMz`}}NQss9X~ zkLI~2mfzV-`K%8<-^}kl!k)QvvhiiXc2iH5n*pD-n|!pJ_oItSuGqtKB6ggq1<3W{ zU`1nr_d|xrZ|BqYJ|_JgS?=uBc6fi!-N)ne9z5R^b{~)ZKauzG=r@Z}51xIK^O!a0 z5Z|;0&K2YBLeZ@)u zpXZ0k{iUWVN9u$7v_$Gp6n(^xYt@3&6g)MnsMC6EF+)t)meejP|zM%MsY!TefDTjVd2J%hs z*V3v4{F^&>xE5^IPcrBf90(FVaud zuuq&vd!m2R;L~<^`YmTay}5C>hWra1cbi790>%S7?)C!ol67Y4hE2b>A-R>a+xDCG z+!pIQ4Ss9CeNKpR%5j1DYskOQ`A`%5B2Vh2W7YwzmtKfomfz~d{K>7I9~SyOkPP^# zSHtK85c!pFFyeVoUR zjh%^*_u?eBasJSDYPr;t=bRS0?^%Xi#!WipTv8*Te5rpv_o&bB3!USQe$TkXnO;AN z{v2NzXUQj`{nuvWjQwpI>7uX18U0BdL(dra3X0z=FSNfcD?Vx0e2$j)`&hqC@acLG zJ@|fZBJcNQKH}`K^Rx=+e4nM*)T=^E5l3X(OMV&oF*zcQ2rPnSWS4#{qo0-6Xc1`a|?&etm94=3)A~BH~}3 zN1%TTkW*IjL?6Z%^{%RPSF5gG?RkS%Am8+Tr>tMrYhUq8xz=Bi?VO#qURf{HFB!lm z{$jt7L%QfL?UDJ24fs0?eaebo_Y3q3{Z~_b(k~?TcKZeq#4Y(c!TL@14fH;P)RP?# z;@dkv*nQ=aIS?f#yewJ_Ud>`$r7(Uh?<86%kZ_e<| zKbO=)y7dF~A&!+CsT28m^*s0dO5!QO^~`>R^~L81vf!sYwr7@GQt5u7e!0{6F53ss zCDj$bw0}Oo%;%3Ow-cbJ#C-$zPdD5CAciP`vOv&YXvc zT#0k~h4OgcU(Z{m{N`fU-&Ii_{oM*E-*4w;f0*UbPxNo}sm@-z@7+0Jb|0Jk3GiEc zIo~2~ZhtIj-X(rxej?we!}%(oN98(+`)PcSoY*P$^ZO?q=qnCZ33iTR<=*91v&%U2^ zx-Otz>8CqCEcCsrIq=h8W8D9=?_Di}Py5SncetNu-)oTikeknIeu*EB2Sm=#ZTv7^ z7)PR?S3i^Y3`U;e>}37WfAm8J>1I5ddw*aad|FTGU)k>29xEYy>|e>(RCc?@SWcXNbObK&L7lU_{6@7 z$xr?w_^o{jvtJfgUI+Q@xHVoLT;KhG@;d-#p!Kk@BKD%-Tc#Cit~}-rsZgsW@ITJ}inpUOi9lH$`?1Zr?07jdb2$b@t3Z z$DUJighzfs{azV-+73N0V!6DZ&`@$cy(jx#-C6p?9=o5wevNXY&vN$abGagy`(_EG zi~ibAn|q%~0r@z;fc6poe!pn;>&c%3pY=~^f$vpqBERkDqc5NB z7imW)pgd_$w1b%YDCUn!u^@Z-d~tl&X*&>m?Q;{fHv>K;)~|<%+0S7;P#@}FM}BLs zJy%5jR!DjFe6o}$@lZ17mZ^u0hs16Ri-#!q(&YC9`t9G8L;n=OXZ_Q`xlO%a=JyN7 z@9m$%6Fo)l2

fpYuvy6NTUVd#-=uc*ykt*O$UC{p0}p#gfzdmbkF<+zisqI5dGI~E^^Agt{Tez>;#(CNf?mvw_;L;11IZS@g;SiX| zdT{h%M=xFOFoyd(#k#w0K>z5++;tgPxXNAEfZ0#D>vqFo>QfFI!1UGbx(7^u+Fdt+ z!_T_wO4DKHT8E?S942vYG=}+J6Bxb4rFU+1m})z00Moa*>mD$DySpx<-_Cv+*LOLr zecfT@Ziho)@|*6u4ouzSuDifO*IoC3nS0%J6WIEeyB+{@-v`>8?k>0^Xlh119m_sQ9lPUl#9^DFb78-%178!23pGc;7|^*aF7!UWydn2T%Yu z@qB(9&#TA&xO>aOp9e z@2>!BJm-&d=Oy3(n8SJN4lsrDx`Rcof5OE0r&B{z%1@VcY!_JHy+|XQ6Bs0UEmP=$9e3l_JLXK@0GBB7R7#51K0z`u#T<( zTfhX?pEY0v>$eoJ0PF#)n7@vIdCa@Iz%u4JLtqi}fIhH_aUy~KxD1p&SH`&vo@Z<- zy4NpS3kdc>Jt}Tw(V5JQ-d$RrC6N~Trd9rfg59C7f_mMto zyLsWWzP56|Z+&XXu1p^zJ@X=`ckQTh<9P=iehSm$DQ5@mxpvu0k6pUM7bo__h0*&F zd4G5Px;1C7S$Wzq>(`yNYW-R3Rv&uCo7TRf?A`$C`w4RMz%8D()la^B_G>@qWG#-Q zw{`l`F4Buz2Ga+4ud(G%E(_+*ndgTnKZ1P{D<_5bZ64EXFWf3#NS`MEc(2*`#0@hy7xi|UCLp5Ao9Dhr>%O$ zx|L_HK3VwqlXAQ~{;!F0KKI}s?z-#6hx^k*FMVkrbn@MOdA-Q|q6gz_3_eK{J$Rpm z$ob}Js}4BhTnNzRr}lC7{`$s?BBgh9-YG0nejap|-~7^PHz2#DFH4=`;-L(_$KSQ> zbIF_X&Lh;Xbm`Qu4!-Q$KeUc>Ps$Vi$CUd#sYP zJk&+<`0D_)oA?Wzy`-~UQcu!bSeKN3^P^EM?u>pdP+THE}rFo(or9~l6>OV(nT(vauP3c_Fw;rCk}$@Ap!mo z{FDKI;p~-LE~Fkx;J<0_w|+RN9!luf8sMY9*{^9oiT>6fjJM}!PrI0QiVXP$@kjP` z_Wt8r|GdH4D{;>6H&fP5A8tI&Npt=!AV2kb{LyRABCq6c-|qZN+QaMG{um`Pq<$L6 zA4$1=s?*oL@ZIDM(zgTtZ2h9S`Vo1N3uf#4AD^v0pyk!y;>sC7PHaDC|Bc6<{+6Kn zD}$f*rNF<}%lEri>QDbf-@M^3fd3oC*LGS_{iS^fAx`__7Cb$I^a*g$>ke>e~WwXJ1fYqeBM6xU(QbP zpC5mS&wAO(*?IJ;-)cW~(=I;q$j9=w-*dNXg5s|X{yMOXd@HuwxR3Rd)OQK<@}|;D z=<#iwKGci#&G|a(jdae}EuHgqO_%!bu5)&AT;ROy)_uRab&y@QKghkz`SI{;9=%@d zqR%G!;62k7@CjY_2b_Pj4~_kU<@s^>F=sdRrCwq4MLWM7qP(#AV$#e<Q8(*FfOg1%HaRgm6v}dC@%ROq$c>JY|ob)xDF-OFu#v;{)~B9 z0aymsfK6Zr*a!A7-x>lN=*NcaZ_tk7zzpKD4;%rb@J9le2DX5GWse`{(0`=po}C*x zRuQ>A^VVbQRvx+b1N@Hdyz2&op}VskL)9f>|+mFyKXgk zwfw{Z&QD)#-g4=Kho1Wn;Su>+(3wYYQ}Pd9xqc;iwfqX?{CVGx{ASC;9zIZbB)tiG z9_{LcLpH8|?L`-)nBGM??f=oMhkv|kzk{xnbl?6E{Wymt(hmo&Jaf$|$?W~4e9BK8 z=X(#D30^h>Ta(qaUxxFyjZv+v$U^Is3L-_x`@HNI9*L zau^>(&UKGnxoZ8IRc?1p%O66{AL>8f_lDztx+mqw4s!NEB_G5N?t2h9cRgm!>7^r9 zpMLsEwSlM0$wJ;9FMIiuuKWGnuVp#qkaDOuk@cd>(Dl)RoZr4?>m@5cas9oN-w%*4 z`6_ugelgC@`Bi7pzdyappCq5y$@WI1KMy{3-Rjjxt}F>3emC^mKRb+GCFvrMekW4T16Q85@{Cn$&NxLF z@e_G1$ms!pcI_Xp|Ke|V9t(@aQ{)x%_3g*mBG;c#mY|f+`X^G4qe`pS`5lvq1D2md zIZJM+uD$(9_k397Nja5(@}(TsKap|Z;#qP>BDy}?kaOfGpHY1D?4u8nbdf{<5LurG z9)IxaRclV3^l_9opgym3ereQC*zk=nZWvJ>?Ilv~tJbbNedTFu&eH-#zZB%;fNRS8 zeDa>J9_|m%q96MkBKzOmy0w#7^X;TQz|Y=v;kkz#8+}al5DN_G{mXNN$B+MzeDqiP zHrEdK+VQ*HH|)2=4b0aL$S3te{}35hN3A<~^*Sh~^%_CWv(_D!IeweB940K19zWFC z$^P}k*S%-a%5zWn1Ite%9U^`3%HMD>2*fDH-6AlGai<9E0aNI&iFI6$feEzBG|;9u zKp&zVWKiGCXZgeAP_HKPQ=ZLFdKCT(OD~3`H$Z1OHov`Qd6sUk$v1}IY`XPRKSV#u zVg5Yo+xnA!4oeTygYsQGEsoSNKP{=al6Yo+O=LgtMz8tv-iyR5@4IvkcX9iHUw-C- z6*u0xtH|F}yEy5rGuHe!VpimMy#6nGgp>2=C7-(PTZiqppAfzD#VOF)PprQ>f5Dv} zS@$eS_s*3?a!BWTE{gqdN#{??Vf*Y19!=iyt;g;Y9!bw$=-NHYIq)kRN`Jod(&HrE z>o*p$oFzv;tu6-2&&xNtuhNGe{q3&Xf<}pcbUq__f`v$0N=;_62{uo&C(i-|=gf z6UBZD^>|>%*MH(I4?XfRN%!qJ3ibel?D48)?tFR-dNqMD<_EI;6yni0%p>0P(c7-O z>$+p#Ch4Bsjchl>#ggFtPAWT;|2=-8Zw13A2pR=~An^3F9bBcEK$zDEV=O~se+>W}+A z4ajZJq)+=Np0E7WqtE^Hv4^$Rh+K&e+C#rR?fTE2vEt?r?e5Z-ENR`eX?sQ}FZOEZ z7uu7;wa5{B$S2ogPY&tjS-!WzMLG4cX*blJ32;)m5&e-0A_@v&v8u5R`F6-WbiYkI*>B&v_nxP691&gQCw^p{ z^L|k3*lBz@E@vnEtL;F1|KU%5-|4%2;2g@SBHyO!L;TEsj95UvrYcwb%JTT0h=cyU zUG$c>fAbeop7uM(+44gt?ElB}fBrg27r*Os(Bk(oZJ{NykF5*@!PS_|SQmed*9Q{q817_x61oC(moDqZYjyCTNm?>g)pD1P0qQZM#~$osuEqa#wEH6H^sm^%pZG6&n)4686Z4h#JnPQiHJ|FYi<$Pgk1L<;@!z|}jr&$=bwIcd-AD^Q!ZV~%OGD3*aF`1 z{Oh+`0y&P`>DPc=3GnrR$FBSP{Y#BMME=~m*E9eyX%g&Kh^eEQ0^CoAHS0?U-IJ$^S%PoTR`e0sP&@Gzm6Yx!Y*IA zcYCBy>Vf_Ie(yT#M(QKwaJ(Hue*Cr5_-9!`?W+X+ddQbn`DEPh?CS1AF?LhnD}ax5 zDZ^`Li>V*37f~;{mhw3c5Id05Q{{U7#F7S{0~ns=+QmSnOS?~F-cUe)KzpMnPVM&e zSw=o7U;3pa(sPPW`laYyXnzN~^Rn zop$5<_kQ@)k4m{xKb*g`!N+)!bpE_J;E)iB6 z)_491?mh?WyKD5|yoK|4*7sQPiGR3W;CkW@!*x&i-ig0@FZIkJ-g!-b@tWnxb&wr} z*E|20fEA$dOWfM_Qd8;TPtKb%pwo_y;*+=~pU9QC9UwjWhG~2YJx)1>UV~p!iY{?Z zKNpdnRp~)-QAS)86rb3^bA;5N<8DRqd3G#q&R$1)>e}zO(5?rddph_(qFhKnl)^a+ z(hFmEK8fpB(uLnEcQNM!a_yzf#bfp)=SSuv3cu7N=X<2*!7u4zKjVn=dg@bEd{U3( zlYCNNO{Di``62^#Eq;mPdJLo-7 zF3P!dk;nOb{%tSx`?*5F`RT&1K6=<<@KLJpPu3COs{r@8bf3GIWXS1I${(2XzE9ch zuSYKepU4|N=KA3lWTV3r z_#gQ7bIx3zAg4p&Pl3M${sQ=iFTUZ56>&edCYgNwaZa22s5S7v_48M@qu!>lu1BrU zh~qHI+wkJoUbdKn2}+Q-U^}B;Bgmg9;r-#aE9?`{Udp$893PX`kBU+DZ&~h3)0h5} zMo4|u-{}0!^PKPg=$6}Y5EJ_tPaHQ|;D2z>``2>*!lHzK5>J@-_rSl$v5)_j^D6R- zog7ygH<49NAMyx#KA(H9P6_@_Kz3_OgxOf?@aoB<1^Wf9`fsOq5tvfx zqA$nqIP@DqpSQkAuAbJvKi|W(-p3Pq8S-+5zYDvIitgDNsi09i~l*VxACp_wWNI7NaVOnWE>DhzSMtxS7%r63$FfqN?*TyVgAo} zjsL^V2coB#`p31N@B8C0qtdiOWc*= zw;Jd=F2ol3N!)WEYl!o=9LLXEe))KDM!2Rw;m^Ot)pHke$-nc%@3?kJX38sn`QwBc zug1uC^yjbr+R_D#`^h!VKWAQY*j~#L^YS^qa@@~@|Lh%Jck1#5jQdsaFWtI%+lqj3 zpZ@8izh(b*_XBUp+Hq0*&Um4phLEo{mw4d*0daHVT>Q<`IPu51om@R|oNJ?;4ES_? z`|S|>?Y1ANsC_z_CyXC<{T}r`_@VbavP6w@q>DXb2jiJIM)_gmTK72D&qhz3+9Uee zajg$IDa9x4FNbS89<;z;R{Sy^)YP@qPX&BU(6ygfN8;c1bDV#fp6xlk*}h4aJW|dW z>2mG2WAyv_4G--y+j^5*?lSLvcR=h<1%i@>(x(|U7%XP-4^ z{b21)hkZx%5dTsR^`c*i)Qfs1&d`3D_isw2i=OOfBA`>xg5neZ==p|M)?B~S1V6|1 zi9VQj@mlPVdgt>%q_a9X||iO;`8)c#(B5Mm3AFp>+H_}Nv|MZ&d~d;A45-o zUNQ7K;&^ zIRD%au+3_{xNm9ovhA`DIpfXf)yDIy_rCk0$LIB$)&uWb+H%>Rxc{43=loFuiha@_ za9%0bUVU%i`4b}h17aKb+5fYjV1LD!vB>e?(z&jb@+JQHoF@6YN?(a<&I`DoJc<7^ zr|~cSM-kWhzP!+DkXJMOanPHFUO_!|3_S{Z-_UD_^O2z!L65GV>M8w7LS0M05(i%z zboxR3!=Lc6z6%j|o}+t>8xP4N=;fW8Ka^B?(myqKo$a40kXH{VU*et5b5bwrA?4|Q zhy4@xPll>oEr)H%%3(jkc}orJpwwAY{{`8{`HAQw@x=GFQ{S@6FZ#0I;Jk$8)D@qU zLp_OM@y~Mk{tcEpQ1YZ)_6zK<>exSwojtWr;x&b9y}lHB8}jmoKL>ir(4(MN6Mz~?b^ILX2j&x*n~JZ_ zF;l;Jb}i%hC;9yT0P<=;p?mQ$d5)FiY(u4sos2`S-x$x5pFdB>IXn9^a;9;{c&426 zaZ|lT&qUc>>wOQ=lkee(AUz8d9i)7Y5yUpiFDO3oAK(AM^4abxiqG@k(&p@Sq^GXM zFKNghfUfI_ev$gk<9(S-k3SN=Zj$!O_tcZ0^&&Dwf9lKrWqd#O>CT<{(bIo1>5@C^L_PnQC`U+q~>d&;+dTmQcN zE%jRmzrBAc>HNw5P73kH^Me=v{$Kz4{wuaUQFuho0CMboQ_2t&zjAygwyAGr>IYpO z&jThu_?o}>eqMTo$Ps_$z|V1k{?zrTFLk2)V0)857%QuFX1}+c5UbMd~OoyiJA1N-=8gtdB1;u@pZrW{!w54 zo%}6+&x7CY%S$?c;&&Ub<&biAL8kY<=;9l0Kj&AUmrLy=t>~gp6xUqeQ=h!zllmc_lqdC5LV8{C34H+j znu;#%i|2kDNbjh0(Vz1iVj1zA27h1ii{5;mg8Fh^F;;w@-b<73och7Lj^xy})O!>C zVF7g3uh_|-?BDP?u5#4f$9Vm}zwsRED&s--klFP|9r8Hu)N;MQ!=Lwg6HAqTczPai z2zmcH;I=EicFgEH;gWV4yU^K3UG5&=_u9&zcHUFc#Xin+^9NzS9{Nibb9O%?j^yg3Fx$~0Qc;>!P zP&`W9NM_h``c0x)t=|W%Aq&+w~!>xBP~_kvNZ= zeajr=g~d7hTi&<$=gwQ*{hs5l{)Ch#an62*amaEdoj>7Yeg3ECcRJ8-sQjVhp5^hJ z(MiWO_T=1~<$J!GYiHb77aoZVekYxNExu3t-|J5i7d9TNicjR!&3l)v9IlHPUySRX zk|X-k1|rW75xM`*^#$#)=ZNAL&Dz2B7ViV_K1NRQ`RyOq_8i#=de#kp6ZDp%%ecjJ z-3`=V418%|SMlrdo%e-~uI=&F@_%jZzq3{MhkQ=2c;tuvdGx1$>c9F};*9IW)Wyzj z#s_0TFen~!;CFtU_V2t;baVNW>ldH*zOkfB{MC(o-go-r$9CA4?M-;)CweC^?(%uR z6MyjQ%sKzP-ha$j+I#kKw=X9A(hqSxIHX>9zijl9X?<$B)bp&-{(HP`zh^#2(ODM$3=`ZDu==QoazdLE?ZaJ}0+c>lk=Zq+T{ z6**Gh?VGU=hWTWCgPRv${L*hcF`&LD=PjBjcb~s~?jRUDPut1$__5!5`ER!Q*L`1-awJ|TN3KOL+D4>aUYh@_&B&kM zmu;wY(Ua@r66n;kr}(sDVoeFXpJ3_S~a(a;NspUNzKQ4I9Dp%2iHw+x;0^sb_NdPfH8TKer0#)mQJ^sDI4 zpUhuUc&|Fsc^^Ay{vvX@4&ywW?VmCQJy~<}gTiIg_NC_=%uhV#+SdKlg))QIYgNc= z0`)vu>YMW@&WmZ6KA+;n&Ey;j*B#6!Ws4lnvp7%TenIMkQ+u==t}Cn@&UZLZ;kl4< zh#ZdBRu1PooNw?PM<+xM$1y91^Onr(5#Km>5dDz0YdX$yesIm{?~Q(C@jG5A{*iiS zdndBJ6WQ)LKV-Y-e2aB$k@GN1uRvcZKd9Z8l>SnG?8kDTGY&?IPuh9x!_IE|d|VQI zX{1ZJ!asn&bB10Ay=dq;&?|->1-(8?U(`ojw-jC4c~@OadrX0E06P68dh#dj+@9y6 zAA;JsCu442!}hDs{mZz*bvxHH&;8O-4=vmM$Nr_X^U~$cuWa93R~)+NC0B6#rk+wR z^(Wf*Aqm>JJ->o zr(eE#KB1)K2K75!S2Pu$#95r?U4SJ{S)`YvhY_8m{9yu?_9^S z-QV)FpS=EuAN|=$t{$fMt2obN{YyH3;y>0iv8u|^^F-$7yg2AQnzWDVqUm>L#ERV8JQg0Pp+x{j7dQ zk={~#LXYCQqv+xn`+Q4Zr3cy5hy5ePC;H}au8Vq3#@Q>Uc6<6RO{;5ZH(a+B5w|U1 z4_HwAQV!Q+T<0;a?fQxBi|eqb+^|dWPl*rv?-Tay3g7?tSMK6X>1WjbKlJ!?Y0LNi z`IM`DIet6-n6r=Tv`ZfOuMb~y%hvvT-(-B@x*!EU>g!5y|BIi!fBuh{1HTY;IY&CS z$iuH({i)=(OZ;=`($4EfKFbN34@%rnFA*p8z;#v^c9tQp4ICG z=}pBa+_{&3 z?qYu*)APq7whKuXJvmMgIX@(Fp2&4w4eO}Q%@cW_lJ*j-Gy2Z259=yj?B@N=BIukS z#Xm8%TjGvF2jk zlb>?7zwz52vAT*pwpn7~_0C?Rlq>Pyia0uDj8(aQyF0?A$B%Q!auc8YKb(CDoU_x} ze&$_>))HF?Rm=ElNsAhL)E2d+?OPo!I$cy+TCt~;&WBc7RJ4{s zm(&`ijMkE(M3sh8|L1znbv+d{9 z$bXXQsNsWt!=6`#9nwqbgrSH2t-E^H5gR5S`fJ{*`EPtnw{JUT=paXaQaWg!s^49a zKEszset~+d5^Aj`a^}T1E=jn2!zp}V~YccQpP1{cV za+Wjbbbi>^$EVYKk8h_>r}~=hoSW7|l-6iZlWCW!?mI|b8N~(qjZDtPsm`~RNS`B} zt*0QaXPg(4p3pyx>%CZCpK+ERQ- zZ>az1rzhH<>{qJw4%i#mF;DL;HIKj6Gt|Dtf6~yw4^xEw_lvUdS4Z~4KRVZ4V1CNv zLtph1N|U6^7&_FG&UH&K#pQ^h3)=C#axWaK85s33#(Jz1FF(OQdJt#+Ic=S{?l(T! zd8p$0_VGJk-gEc(&ERRw(!VzHs(l@4Z<;KKhq2 zkH6&fo9|+NtA0T5=c6oNV`}dMLOsauiWBj-?-{T|^G2nbk7?aSpZgItXtihs#%8#=^c{5of^KQ9?4U7Go@7xcr# z=L{ZkSTHc^zr}hf5ikFNj~={N#`qns?swUJ&JE*QOGLewSMRO&3G(aLzuEpv=k3H- zGLgdH(no3Rr%}D5efZ_of4utOeh*7O@kIZm{zm=NF!|+}_MWGkdCuki>RB^-qMz0J zv*P^W&!--)FL`Yiy1|Z)^x*wDTHpE8=r+&$cAy^f8}yzVP#kIhN9$mz@`pK8BK zwSK6559ovT;;);P44<&QaGs-mBI#Q-bcn+SVLQ(OK2Lnx(4&4dztOpors_p>H$?V8 z56wTcZmRmX;|J{V@BL9+!d~#vd`0V_x)-Qu?MC-6)XC@D zH+(*5OzsKlagOl7pneqRO5;C^?CsZ&B~3o;&^oEsQ`?lAF?5il{!6LkNUpz*>aWL? z4L``ObKKB6s^m@>y7wcuaDK17zTB?i2f5k(9KF^lC3kot;sZb1b_+eUzN55Add(}e z&Qs?5x%&6n&H-pWM}Aal=gp``{~SQs=nK21*IzGicBns%{cn$5^F@dFLAy#ZKWFHG z&yoL#hi}rKMGrqh{FsLyXFOFse2(~fFMcRVeAC01*sj|KkA5w7V`Lx3i6+O9B=Pbm z?A2q(6a7xJ`T@}(4a&}FUwI=Bi(4*NYU?8%{UOnbdr2>h7Nk=xvwC7bbeyg&;@$U z8}EfY-Af&~=eu)A z=cpaMz9XvhKF<{C4_f`N`MCvAx)lAmzB|+XpLx2%N6bwe9pxL7}W@1CzImdh{v*Yk^~XY$wj$rSJFO#IyW=j(qw z;lX%nCcV~gbkA3o^fzWd|J^0t$30&~(!cP|gLizuTPK1)RbQn&ogTX9Yta3dsxQ$u z$$#{OxkLW_m$tq{ANz%qlmEq8XU_A24D_n6&K`~~P5LcP-?}p2qYwKT>aBV!kluO{ z?MY*|QoRT1yGs9l&2hsA{Y!iY7x!9ks?zQ{>8xsKm)h^v`;XeEJr9rer293c_w|q8 z^T=X+sSn!i9N}RP>`;H8w0Mj2lRppi@6#-k4t$`W=4sot~%<>c`0#rDfCf0)p~B7^hf@5^_$+$`fQu@ofU7H({FuN@5{a%s|n&; zUW=?*7-a1bDi{7F5*#hXQf)l z&5^#yv~9|xJx%cU*43Vp%uoEv>1E>t@v8SEzddF4jp7Y{sPnsE>HF*V#tyOf_z4d? z`n9J9<@@UaYEM=2Z;}ptYYC;4CPphP`D2fHhT2i;rLF!ZpmW#G_0m1k=8gbY04 zd~}sw`#MXy{;HpS;46D3mvMCCoYy&y?*Bm6jCt_L?NR-s-}1|AKK+F?*Vsd2hIsb# zTfcEC@Y_7;=bvL!|D<@6ysps;eoy?Gac<_Fz&A;kVLo)jdV=~Nt@o5kS7n+v^sqzy zgVu$mhh0y=cxwF$f9gG2X+wG*M}65op%>bp|NUgs(?jFF)^k+vu{)xAg54>?{`yLV z{BphYL!-nO3?A`WGBDz3nEn|jzF&L>{p7syC*61OExsph_P6JC6ezHB&iv$Yz4QD{ zznlH_5a+Xqv+O-?o;*o8ZKnU~zHt4V6ucEZ{pdAbUvvBMm-ZXqYxg?-nTGS5=)YZm z_vwD)d-rZfA1D1N)16LT_?dp=`zYx%hq-bU(x0*GQ*SM5e6OG;;V)pdZ&(X@h`pWCLi^#F+*vR`AtIy`;ux$oNp+uJBBXkujVE1iu{89 zD{ElHW14==6QBNabYF+!Ht3(G*X7S7a{fUJ7VLNZ2af@W_A=t;#FzO=#O~Mr+R;ns;2zAo!u%2eyA_qqiE0hpk8!-PxX>#d6a|w z`aLI|i@)H->mU908|NI3eAuJ-A7i-${eXNu;G^Gb(mwK%XKb_50SgLYPjCB&Cix8V zi+rlIM*5D?JFxvN^&d(#?jCYfQEI_Hy}HD*_c*^Du+uV`pT7CuB4ol)PDr1$0gfCZm_ z?vlS=v)vZA0Yn@o?sa;IztVpD@crcZ?;(DC704g*&<@qV`THtmLx;Gl61M#t;?Dnl zfk{&i`Tn}4-PeTvs(+H0EskSG31?LJfxZ*w*NCGU^y=@)MqlMnfIzTaz~sNeeuE@Rds`st;8CY?i8J)}P4=10^1dm!=?{GjvbIV4ACL7w<4)wyceW$QihyGTCzpEmiVJ$#AyoQIDS zU-0l#te299FA_g)@Q63R|EigM*rWJSnkS!zp$q-v^(^f9yP7m$UO95L zD-Zs#NBxh^J?NZ8&FG7AEw7x$2aTsHH)YC!zxrj3Bl_J3`}-5{zveqib&f;hfZso> zK6S4{_K()TQU9#*Kyr(QZc%czzis<#^bfw=y5R?V)h}yYkleOMH{G9}@ATF=soBnF z=^U8qUHvBNv!8w=&0fE#f7U$`k~?PT;1{jKD%E{Bfk-!p7^4Nj}t%U;m27oRS%yezV6{W)U)Z~>%_MW9{rB) z)vfMDyB>_}!+c%$PU;?udlvgj`=s0Ehu5p1pU`-dVYxxS`>y>*-7~RNcHK8O8$0Gi z)Cc(J9*Hvfl=h7D01Y10yZU#fBc!hyz0n_JuI=qd^!<{)<57RmG38)yD(~d3?L@|I zS>lG1&dpzbFhKCFdwliX&+tRkm-oly1PA3T-v#7*=RP~%w)bg|g~!tnZ@LGu%yMd% zwjTnYH2cl<$mie(k~b}N&!?{hXyvTS{M{?5%cj=9^HqR>{zKANu;c=Uf7QP!RX-Ph z*x8q43i^KSdD!H`u1VU{_Usxlbk?p7z&Lo0TIGgZ;ztjJ>jKs;+5Mr({hwOzqBg&--S)}$e-D7c1%9(s1j~4RsEzMiQ?4Su@Mvrp07Nz&DiJu=h6f4x3xod zu66I{uY3HOIqM)Faz@E-jH&uR+wWRA8>3+GEW7Z~-7da=@sN*|BRzIoEVJ8>R#-7? zxA2$bplm;X`Tcm}QETT+f2B-5>}XQ|j%P>S&{;b+fg-`P`{Qr^`Rr`-_xRh|Av@pt z+(nt++!JSuDQY&cl!4Y;j&OrZ?W3- zz2iui{F9GUANKbd!Q`ucdJD>3crP4z5ct?cmC%$K7hZiU9$U(bI%=J@zRgHjeOXp_z*0) zfEQ)g=o8N0C8nV7XV;j?hh4*jb4+Dd-OyRPwgcnf`PK#Z4E^c;kMD}VtzEKv-<{XJ z>X}zAI}Z6_eVKLzJ2d}Ns(v;5WYkWfzyEzo-sD677~vFCjdvwOXZ7D63I)$j`5hNN z`_&(X(-f<}>|6Kr$wPMg+z-A8TIer736@;Iut(#AQrQ#xi?b)737>=q0|`6*aUw-J zlou7?_I}8Z|(e{b!S@+^_}*s9eh&1H zb>DLL8>*b_Ome)_`eel`SADy;oc4{hKdN#~Qx5f@_*Pmth;|<1QmwzrUZv0vb{FHl zeu_^;_P}oKgKEE2e#{v<#MdZc|2w}a>O1by*NCrq_#*KQgNI*R21XpDNY^3W+6CM2 zAP&-N_u8lTMAfe?2RVsN+Sm>ig;v@wPn#WoFbvf^-$b2ma9a)zV`+9t>R&U-PDV;aL3H zs6JuW2>p;GUV1}cJ*fBLeS7OYvtaWNpOufrsg^2|>WZ|$*u@b8^l)b}fpll^ONf1x<``};AY z5A?1O_T$*!7ipMs{rs-)QCfyB?6(GdkJ2@Ch@aH+k)L2s&cI>(kbZ>tetrwu*ZkB4 zE`D_0^T69rTz077Jd6GJTG90*`o3hG{Qj8!&pC5Q7uCbu#TySge)_&-g7i=PWuKGg z261U0@Si-Mzf1WgS07WPude^y^1Q62cIN@w$2s~OzcWd^;QX*)^;2^5(=+LPeF_Cf zzwnNK>^7&5KBHe`ze&0x`EUBIP4Al9M<0DZUOL(7FaBq5y!z$+_>Z6H_&3Q{^!Ge_ z!@2$ZqjP0d(#P6P|CiTXb%TEX(RsBj>C>b?ZPjybTC9(MTE{wl^gT_1^vmr2Kzi}i zOn>S;UYF&@N&k~0j@vLEd{1K^)UW?teuMPq9rxb1mgw_6jr8eoeRYiI1>daxVy!tE z1SrIgqtYw&_o!V+7tpDFYg`t8(IB<)u66I(zUNVViM~qtgTCicyo>KnwkH$mAL7Mcwoxa|)**V=V_HpvZ$ajN%{`>4)uXBOFbsk0WTOXi@+K<+i zq{m&4ADruVE>q`o)Q%D_&8+W0oq@jtm#4o=ObgVj%`|KHVSG(}%=KqFf7xODj*`xr z4!gBaI>Gvyt~XNwpwqtS2=`YM4~8t9-)LX7GYg&e&qug_)Q=zh61?e$kJ2gH5r5hF zG0k*@DTsq{Z=T}H|Gl<4-;cB}top0>mX9?FPy8^dFU-5N?^R}g*ObHjPy1fWIJINl zCI0pG2R2&fDuD2#_D9qIp#F?cl7|WSXx~fs5WKMbO6y%;`%iekA^2#&vqV0F{HJvm zrFqg+P&ptu~(cuc0UvT(t2-$^uwfsT-d4g+;D>-!0o$N z=d_&{|MC9Fhn?CdEU=u~9rE=cP88Ql%SKKZ4~#Q=E(P-!?H}sAk?fo7EgzdA+%5OU zgMLS>#{BrJQ9kt2x`omN{g5Sn%Fsg}{f?OQ&^VAabeK;Sd*N8c!0_7y+ewZ1e&=e# zIQo>+x3!7;ePX=_$hSyghvG-6es6oq$VLC-|1R|y`Nlg=j_L<|VXy4dddE2DllJ$p zQGcTIzeiC!*F0F~SH>t0a)LOV{(Wz)U+6tYdMN(=b&yHJr=K5EhdI0a_t25Gdf#&r zuSIbIyEQIoy+e9u3|(M%Y=p2qw+VckdX)`5+M9o#v*P9Z^Zwc18z)%4Y4||@ymuZ- z_0TbNh|}ahBfFt@m3n7Ae1Z79!Q(w))WC?>wCpC{#uMri59UR2>ZkRysWDd{pZoTK z_xoi)KlTNeUnk%E5e~j_`1yY-<{fv(KS_G=Z?oK~Kl$h<)Ye5G_G4^kemT(~we8W@ z$I|tS!`$o6&qb!7M|-Tz>5aoA^D9iPF9Lthkv%96IkH7*$17*c2k|#o{rxolUs3({ zYwz-N+R!0R@`UYsE8?MK=-{sg^%*CAS}qLW13xql==DR1-!JrAcd+%Tg@*E4`&F(!Tb4dPq*VVHA|v z`{dW&KJkDPozZ>?? z`;Hqvkf(XS&N-@n>xK^PutnJaZg^C5-N+8mcj?EZhi?*}Hh9#hKOW^wem{H1$){lG zV2?i@DSpd_4&zbH!1%sE?=^MCZA$!^HVwUvFSQ##zV!a1bD{daAn{h@C+Ms9AI+;p zXTL+}XTQ#i`sX+O?+D7CJiYhm{HEfoX6X9KQ+(-sB!Ug`?8jHf@PU1L&(XYE@s)f# z@&n|FzfybdGl-|Ts-J=>hq&?QIpyB`>3%>inpG4&UzwhW``!BaCCdU-;+#^Ml&uA|`HqQR4Z1CvMbY4~8 z(Wgk4Wm+-xuv_Okb-q>Yw2+VN3Fn2JFQNUzubK}kjsMrt>zt&{eX76kzoSo*9{JEi z=Shbja(pyD%NaWOdzA2u-}$CpA^g5WcS|r z*`n^TfZwJbjP`BdH}O@PeJ}De+N-_;)%pLt$%mi(c}e0S$G>Rk;HPoIwG$)$z?V;O zaNVPi6W{dkx<8}s;YW+&yH&V<2Oq(&$yfx#uL+h*6EC~vQ>1pj9ly%mm#Kc%r&B*Z z+wTFWy(=B1{BfgSSfAc|`Y`3!`{;}M6F;ST@Avm3{eC_%Wc@O8-9zJX#?bYXC;#cZ z1^m;mpD!Ceh#S41`|Bh%Lx=d7By86OfFB{gW9U)e@j2G6V7-riOA#-9Z9T&8U7piX zes03GtJ&VibdT&X=`G)Y*NpZxX7t1RhF@O&-CsBQ@eS(B#1s9g=8@`8C&;hK)ZRmj z_HOlpKH{k~J=gh5^{4j*$V5H*{bZK($hYlZ?=SLO(a?qMpRoO2H>}66vHkbb55)*K z4IcH|HZa=hi2OOv*`fM_etO{N#AY80`vu(-qWe6q`^fr#=y(5zf8SMx{P$jN*B{MI ziL*<=-@iv|l=R=Z7%E8TG4u38jPX z!|GBV$|L?``?+}6eOQysPtBj{S6lB|CsqGw=b^!S{q%iU()Z}Q4&6rkkcdy=p$GI= zKc=)v`F>pb_hC(u4t&D?WiJ<3>R%?9A73o$9}s`Tg#G)b#z>zx^oYMv1BdZPx-#+o z<1d&`e5iMvj$h)|1^V?bXm_<8d+9|d`?Ovx|7(8IHu}N8!lNAgEB%zF7mxhWZ@kZ% zeE3!4o&1`c=k~t~h7NMnzbKU)jY}G*pcmx&-}}`JKgd&iH z$!QdjDPfvWq!^eql89d^!V_?K#o%J4H zVrF}VZFtbm zH+&#Z^G%I6)4%^?==#Z1{rl@+Gk*W)173ZzABi33`V;vpZ|G3pMZ*5RNR0T3M?X$| zCwlSIzY8>J@Tl)81EapPEZ-$w^#gzFL4EuEi24K7qb-N}o?5v#K1wHRUhV4JZ~vX& zyMCDE*YG9>E9t`uCA^OnDohiWkkV5=%z< zqW;o^{q{OZej^@znfRi?V}7Ri)cnkU-yJjbp?+R`Nk99(3qQz@O4Y9^p8fS!f8N&h z${4J;iY>0k|XS|w>HVI*h@cDC4S7{5x-RfBYxBLU!8c>FX~kf?AG^kN>h8g zcr5Mj($2vyjq|)&?QjQIM_pP!nsmpzGX{lukX*SU1~Mwhm3a%sBm($sA(jot3j>K!gE+~v~rA6(jf%B3-$ zTdp%5=DE%^&nb@b++Y1wM?cQ}zbe-e+FVD-@_i_+_XW=L#yNf@*{{S|Ka-~3&`#RB zJN_Mm59;YHT|uW*>(R#^f86mql}-w)G?)(#r9S4$SC(;ccG)h!U177`kGK^Cm`7`$ zw6dwAQ+pVCtQ=ex)%$>6=i_wm%@p|-8^=9|wqoN7ai@8cU(Rv{o%*Xf_erIXr9*s5 zC#Bhhvul(o=+O@sw(jj$6U-lHYV}0FR#>6;9xwl#f#yS+hsjTEBNz1*U)Jek_odJt z)5JqR*js109P$0mXTaa7jGOPtADZ`n`FF9!rOlsE59ANu>I-{|M}D*H##cgcVMwYK}Q#t`|mUp);k@BFiQ`uMx_E-8B3J_-l) z>LVJYpi`W77eR;mluk<3j>f3R1XJ)uz52h8G{XEAQ(Le7;zjQt{(K^~Zg2f(R&aiB z_C)Jen(xZL1w$9sKVdtcK)b6MI`}6}xWRN#{p&jp#aoH}b*qRZ}(M02fxG!*O^+q<(sho zTD#ZY)|Rfl^`E~-->YxI55a%6<4t#7H1fR@!4u~!QY$&To}s{VcYo%a*Dri2JpT~p zbD!l3Dlzx<*H63mve#d9<>$`rc=|{W-1YZ8P%)x$8*%<`tRQG<{!`d zpF5nK=pL18fC!$iAMxfr<^4|zf9Ei0&qI=fJixLaaKLiLdIZJ9#;J$kst2Py?DW6K zoiO^t-+97Crizb_p$qhyFFNo=oF-Owe#kHtewgKQ9==LH77QN!S*aHuvV8^OyuS_UrF2&L7#=@wjXGE&lqIjelMOgnEsy;_TD?0BfFb?jcSzxy0Bbg(0N zi1Txmc^W~bytAE||it4p~8PMxoyXafwzwxtsUeIrRYx8$<;vaVQivJ4t zoUwZ7QPMwnQM#qINNcaw|D}J0^pCxG{O=bF z2(8WF@4v51lK!w0HhTr{T9zJu*F4&nBOQ=}PUD)dzfY%i4d0KJF3@2{f2Voe@M_NQ zd8WnBySOM31|ReTlS}lzCv|COm2}q5a2)XF>%%?kWYM{1#k1-?v3eBui03q6yMBlM zZN$*QUsKYb`2O>?;Co_koYXj|ex%oqXgvH2Gp^39{NiP|OnwV~vE$*TKm^bC9=`P- z%N~B(srVay&_2ERX3mc8twy_UQQt08jfcrKB0t#i@M$vo-hS7VulT__S35b;cz78Q z!IRng*h4ahUiv8h4*WGFIe-Hev-VHb9{JHefb5ts`LLrvxU7`#LsNzh{jTVs2kJML za&`_g6+Xjq8G}c?=M9W{uhDO##P{ou(N60(x%k!lc!T=AvBzp_`27<2Y98&EgMND8 zNBKi()98nGllpM)e5lI&E>o2QPxw*&gW83@?~nb!wM)=Ju5?x^K6-xw9pX>x_R24= z8O0Uksh`n$h5S-6bf~8~VLN{YK1ckNp%3KFICs}I`H-u9Q@yXr&hGoPbI|^T>>OFE z*G~15T5pz}WkUyhs)YUh@HFw0h8}kM=gOu`exS>YdP*?AYv|yQJkOO$FU4PS?Z}QG z{^wGJbvX%KLUjQ zX^Qf0p^#noI^(PV+VM-5C|~osb(w$Y)xWy%k*%Nkip!rnx8Ug`J&+Io#MW_sNHLYZ zS;C-0{~|iTsLulP$9m~v6$8U>6V!i#_n9MvfKjWNBbbLv8WK4tqw{cf(xIgalCz}^{g-zMMTFGT$q;?Vyc z-#Y0MA8~$=@4y*+rIS+SE7iJ@Qj|kKSow(ai|9tlANjUFQa_lZ9#un!cxn)~>qo%X zXjj|N_v;5^>qhN4s83x@9INr1Qufv3s;_N-*b`2#=zHS~%W0m3d_9&==}l+nmM^Ye zSa@LNeq_6hq9n53t&q?C#{0w~LXQdre9{yH4l0EA062p;y z(BGvE+^@eKG5P)UPg3rvp|kz1>RIFNn4yFGiC#F?GH~cu)_0qD*{ixiigu>&R}))s ze$DrhqYmHbLu%hD1A471rq*-*ke?nN{ln}1+OdBwD$jCjWqx?6+KT1xzgLt=f73O) zB;L<^(FEy-j^FBm_w!yfMf!6ed1SYK??oD)eY>SIQq-?>Q##vwOm_V!p2GK-HG2E+ z1oKCk+WJHN)`%}I;=RK5%j)+J{J`B!)oWOvJGyom+n~2T_ul2emHqm({jAO*s+{i+ z>8mtP{-A@sg;jdT`IO`{RXNZ@uG+z(`Ww(`-uQp*PbMk1WAsG3R)3P*(D}#Ss}txr zqd&=#&gnh4KPebGwC8d!9IF{Pw4Zv_iMRfNEIi@3wOp@Xb^b*27F#ZekLi1rUp>O{ z*#8rEukzB@z8l`ug8bA*&Tg%XJ-@KD#YM#@PXjf^uW?VFukXkNoiR@3KkEEfUz^Ykntb>zO<4Eqsvawb zE|5Q8bl{8ezRvt9LkE1EaL2=!X@7iUrziLXd}ApCBmO#!yA1LD=AmJ`Ua>d+^m~Ge zi$U?X*mTEkQ|*yA^St$h$%lW6gmr(n>SM~#A&x``JrFOkO`N^MOoh*} zT*kvsu^#dUk2o4NFyg4F`XYW%98G!eU0R<|y$p(@CmK zoQEDvgzHeqSO0Pa3Ixwf&we$z?A$MMe<1k&)mtx-9-xJv;~%5Hm`dLq zVbHzlB@jx$Al$9;O@YaYJCIB0nI)G=;+Z5ce;VaLFTrzxIu zi*M%au=c`cJm}BM-nz8b!xaCvTsU9gzTXSXxM1|hch9?jbjJSZPn?L@yFdTo-5>bz zlB)tleHN+DI8({9zgH3VSIQ5{!LJj9TLuri+XjZ+S;3n-yZg7JXuerF&CQRs??Sc1 z1pE~D^;zf?r!CUyy~*dNIEwRkZexsRpHA=1!@S2YJ%CQ}?#@D|@54){ zFWN8qKD&7>(<;+RrX8jbhxpd_*y^AA%~wD-eQy-)7G3(&&JW-RJC?#9!J|~| z(NFbVwSWHCrxUF2^93u_cj1tUelhRe8$6Zi?HBcZw)$s%Z(7(gqC@*F6SntL0beJ- znnyoQe8b=aePYrl$^4ed4{Vt6zSc4M@cZZo+LgD$+OTSLUS+9QNz{o^-_E z(f^DZ82v?(bYpw-AHRLKQGl?!O?~29J3G~02c5%tmvYuyeVZfiEZq9P;A7>49e#k@{mt$Fy4>2Q zcU*q(zUbK{dypT-J>?gfY9298*zpP87gut6zDGSC*=xr$58dY5pP0_4y>|i;JVU!2 zv+cZ}-}-O-9n{NE-tYq~`$O7A%omc|IJp!X8}?w7?>Aq_kPi8ElK9!i#o?OkueBcl{q)#zF-N*_ zuKSAyDd;pVjxK^zXD69IVe(-|@GpFnPMUngTY6ci z$Fx4&H)|WZATH*`w~OpSoTLpL#tFZN$PzDk6dxw&zZ$Fe_FuZcLEpF7a_Bd7-;>rH z^Fw#8eAzYIgzHQ;o>JGi@lWHSl^gJ!=?9~KAZJMTE9K@pe;iytW#RYV$-e?VHXdh- zZ_U#hM>{_HuF2{X^5ge94aR>zI_M>T3?J*xPrb9r&kvvTx2=znUeoiqtg9d0x8uvx zJZ@3yJO`9JNmPdoIvh^StEtPF}xu4u4~f9gos9^&4SYW;)5V!!$#_ zD2w>id{OU@l9%E95OipN<-=URBYzFLCrI-R#Yxl1Lp$pbw)dj~Un4%bL(~q?{u0!? z!2GnyhaaSm(wxbMeTqBjqxbYtLx=V^W?;zm_wgr8KICdGU#aewY8X1m&ollcU+*nb zhAwRXJ4SZn`!vnFYivgyriC|MJ4_pT#Es_Pv$Y@1gJ)|$ng=hc{e*IP?@*2PG^l;( zewjtJ5Af5yGXK~3FVY_srVXZTrio8F|7Msf{&jzh)(@orZ1-vD9wYzv3H|%Dnw~uU zZlJ#BQ(SZnUB9@VdN_Lj2-?eB#Yc9hC~gq9{{2=3laF}R@7L-6HnsQ0XCnUn;#>Fg zv>uJ<`t=J9Po94FFME(HCwtq5uAja3_y4TD>765c(Qm{F=RJId{6`JGU%M`w{C;+q z$fsiH`n7A-Yu(VHT~8Sp`XHDJ^1|O7+O;=6a>Qpm{OD<}UF8iP^)YH-)JKwZW#VNY^wxuY>1NfCh3|GajI^q*dE#fkno2KZ6+>)Ronkp?nm%+LID35_#cy|pMWai)Va zOu+~9`H7sfUwYR_AKTseL3qhk+fk}@b^p8bgm)ghM1J6dIM%#Z?{SKQs-Z(1HwfGB z&JllYLkGX*1b@ouJ?K1k)!Tp4dXUyDti3`1F}=UE6Eo6JRDS=bZ9jP?>_EQum#zaM zcz%7rZP)&4^u7!6H`=qm-z7Q7haX0%?-*0)L<8e8GcJ5LGk-G?42 zu8Ulc0>N|jahoP?y(9e*{0%)Cp54A49m-4W;ryp{qBLR0C(>hA>apaBH{G<&cF7+q zU;g+R5W#c*MNhQ<{pLCc;BT~t;`e*U>9GY)-ueGI?;O9qLGRcs`*S7gS7BOb+8&_y z?$rCxjn~@YohPE-Ta@16f>)sHr8k^#&JzdSbu09S9_7_~-+O)krT27p(aS7oYaZ@qY?mvur)ygaW~H_!cj{_?Q2@75)qX;-yZ0EvB09`1|787u}0; zHaKO)9k*R?#TCHQ$_W<|1KfA_JU{j9sz~7MYfr(hTqlAEo01@~gyy81<+1W0jjQ`S5FsaF(h1g>>HO13rOY=8Fz6`lmee zONK5Se_20c9)6tos)vsgU-$5N#&OfbPqMwX4Ices?9-9H;dny2B=P;$|AKg!KIf}( zaEBvSy>hyb5Aw6;xp5*-KCc(II7j0t#*xWgddHC>>C{f-clZtcfXE9DpKl&UB1kc|Vu6Or0{`&0nxiWwKPJ03vucJ7w85CO^OTd-xl6k5iusrv2kG^8Xu@Gx3xCzp=);CmjzykR$*9 z9f;sL_2GBwzsVl70scli^5a4FARl^kDL=Wd^P~KqA?)}>diKYXC_ zW$#Ns1W)o;Pks7@SMQy`-$A_$NseII4>({sV_$$`Vh!ri?9pdtdz~`*u&YeC%2f54 z*smvE=8Fz`AgmkC4x(hi}qH(eip!%xZmoj)>6CC`2*h4v>plnebq z`m)Lec-TE|VA$QJy*1(o+3oKqYQJ!h-P$))zx3*H=bbin_ny<|NT+7mpG=H6yEU(p zyfpE!Gi=8zIXboTt+!q5-*>;oKx#=!QKI>6bNW(s=r8~%B%tjUL6 zQ_`P!`LAf`5I56w0bj(;xabWX@OAQ=^zeD&rwkr()-^EVY>M%f_#bD_pg5~~=R(_vPOy51Ly>(4F_(|(3_0Ky04>~WU{lCxk4;am)>pI+KW)cBPEYXZXNUI1>$G3;{QAxr zKCn~!lUj$DyrQ8C+dJWsIqw8~iuk%mU!z@3gGYUi61w3^!GIbBYx_v#|H6(#;bz&9<2GpZ1J=9&afaj{{MsDEmJ!96XALs z>SOqG&fY(|?ATw{>OPg)@Wn#_!cRHo%TJOQKi|a@=-?;O0fs+DS#F#u>0(s_!|pEa ztrOqRZs?(QsrUPS_w0oA%JVN8pS7Mb#e0OH2k89$9MRc!5yZ}nep&sn&eLmO2YeBC zI?toH8~uC~Pmrr|Nc%UFSG#i$6+;LA)d~CiH(BDRJo+Tzu7~f?uZcq=JrIAx21Y%M zo#W~=OT6@lU3$WCe~sS$OYc#$#oqy&J1&3t`|X>o{ecapzXPgK-n|sKUgfiozWlYN zZvZv?HOYLvw`smrU_Syn#Ig9?M?On@^uMdz{F{fqu6(^0{{x8NdFP=OUb$yt|F!Tp z>MiBjC3}z$JrajG|D~Dgy*N+U@rm?!fO@RB@So@Yak6`m^7a1pDiFbwe)JQk+`7%9 zN8<0GUWOz`ur0?hab{kaQ15dL;UPMu;ud)@_F^j7mA19zU+6Wbyu07-W)`?-i9p+OH?Pn~$-}-yLyuntBLl4AR$?yX# z`;i~892jTWBb=Y|OhJ$Kqxl%si4{yf{2L>jVk-ZR8@fP``Jw|~#M1=xTZRt!7WHp? z_`K{I?TO!5(!hwb80pf)4~jE?|4I8xgW^oVEC&`ICW&NU(yDKUq(rnBfg(s zg7}&rJF9m;V2OX;UDvxyIM4k^?|wj;{A7>f#MvFKTk70I;uDvxx!*Hqg`ZnuzaYi& zTl)ptH~dz1{}nVh1TQ@BW7(T0NiOn3KXRVXq+T7SsiPwQKyKwcH!ezUgXc-k*|fEh z>;+FekQw@4E*b`Z3V~hQAx6Z>yZ6i**eQyYqw-$2ouW>&IYsX{FxztlIY= zyY)W)%%`AH@V>oZnG<&3{J9kVhTSE~I~R!H`RnlFKR$c2-5Qj#l$N#`@L*j$Hpo(U!SFze+spF$~3Hz^Gd;9IQ z$w$4#27R2^ zzci>mHC}H|hdlA$4OiRY*z`N#2YYixCr9_{il6OYQSaijBl+yq{mxB4I&6dK^AzF( zzNin49ZFRnN+&26^r#oVKW>(v^rG)Xx0-M08)spn6GdT6%Z@J9#@9k4N1%C(j42ch5)Qi@=m8w2+UyS0dUppBw`Ot5eu_PhuSuD@L&8S=MVoo)GX=J%vU|=JJg)P2lYPVJJf>7 zhreW>(vr!CzJtC)tr)tXUgy;f4E^=Hrc(wV*1v&K|7qT<7(dzBD?MPBp0JtI0eoWI|{Cysh*YAgH=Kk5B1eBldl+byxvS3dKh?+?5DxpOnK%?~KQ&Q$ue2!jv& zSTQjC*d?4g)!9wDSlYnw<0$EJ#P{nz?D;L-6Q=i*hktwh;TqE*0}uR|_3i~Llm8$; zYMyoEj*iD2U*GU!hwQli>VV+KDVFCkrP%7L?>xE5`dh4{eEIoqbS;C-$pG5~4el9S7td}lUF>u&VQ~wF#`}rAq`0L(U zf3WZSpws@Y-e+}=*xplvajQDZIadGuROeVTr$uoS^eOLqT+n-+-pllU7w`xlKOHn~ z=zS1{V2A%+S2p^=AO3rt&U41T6xo6LN)aCPUYGOe^&zdZTv1^?Wz2@rlSvAos=)Gzq!^=iLclh1z-@4UA2wwJsN(DswdFn`V(E3Q*` zdgbF?{@l5Ke`}I?3k4f+Mc>MbC`>{#h(>HG9fluqM-uF-c{(ALu+TYW>y5;fl@8KKt zJ3cyZqI>vKXZ89oOW2+_fnU3nH|o((5MMTU__bnS_%%=aCy2N040VbJSWg z-!o-iI4M|c?0rD*f6vq=|2Mw&*i|#QnRUx*w3cbne#??04#>pM-@-rs=w z8!>e7!xZ%>65sE8BeZ8f?rXf~z>cS&)3~d6)c1=1dGaRZ`SGapT|f`_}!BlmUkE%JSMzSO0&^!eut_dD?iY zGp3^@6 z|7sLhh_@nP8=qnSXXs#Witq%}LH>>{;nsz9kG0md{yy(-o686CW!V3H!;K$0XV)hG z-&T|7qrbFrtlxb(;)ygUGh{`q+iP>wN1q=o#koT*0@12%ekr8;;$!=4HRa-x$Y6zV7^1Vk&txZ(m1r zD2Mp1kiMaE0UrHE)4;HMm~fkEzxgQq8S}n()pzoP?ACh26+1wqSZx1quGc(Z`5VLY z60kcz=ImO-Wye-|ZHMD;y?o1X`2p=X<;jyAki#!UmY<&2=N!Lr;z4KStO-Q$ob~W^ zZ(nr#a_8gkz#l{6130Ln8S|_F7d~C`73`-Vg5Lgp1Mzd6UdV^uE%M2K&$T=GF=yxk zz2=J!1GW->;tGFU?2RgW%w4-SOv(_g#J2aD6}Q z$G+k0c|ZI2kgNHc<|8WSxV!%YU(T41j8G0J!ua#f0Sq(0%vALOdiYu6zus%qZtOWr z(E0O3tzY`TpVXxsJ08IQP2s;8)ieB`F);j4C0(9)t1ooM13Ra@^#kdx__yUyUutKo z?&x@Izwq4kR=j=QhXEnKPI+s)?AWUHPp|XF$CeNKpD-SouXF8^mpCSx&xP@5?19}~ z!m0Cm?M@pQc8`%RNBn@en?C=db>v?>(|Szf5d2bJy>}i^Ccl1uL7eJ)Sn<=m`H&Ny zI8uD+lE6=M=hkOgCsrJ%`8{k?cAg*EZ{tquhW*x)LFb=G(eLIIZ;1RJ)b+si5XFJk z_gsC?+}Esl`uXd4)AJug2f5mxQYv|V>aRm;ebT2BtnVNME1hjUGI2q#pJ#j@!TK0C zbYcHU*#ADFO?z7&z0RL>JiOK^*}BV--GhciFGI^ zHSYXo^|k%4`f0tdPH{aJ`r7uQ_j%C`U)0-P)V7sMo>IlD;uQSR{{8P8CaJIF>s*-5 zndcTT4!+$R4=KX_z2#N%%X#!A;tK|kdM_Cm^`0Z$IPtOv`swMJcXNG9_xmgtd!z5~ zBx;=W?-3GDq=Bp%^{?L%?;1VBaoYQR-$~}DzB9A_1HZ?TOS^tu{kZ+zn4o>llYX5K zMt-*Op!Ybvk5niJdWY?wus!z=x#eY?+*rxQPs^0+XK#u59YY5_rsg_6lCN8$9tK?z8u}_tPr*s6KW)^6~?%Pefn4*U>jT`eQDf|B-&{ zAl@v z`+>r}QGbu}>X$VxsNSo+chkEn8uEqn!oz)xul|Pi) z`5Np}J&jxx*&DVy@{b+o?3G<5Lx*-YPT1dXO%q=?^sp;+1ml?JB%3B5`YQI7CYawg zbkHx!xRzdu-*_dm1N~mQ7mke>81Xzzzm5{$fBh`@9@aZIqWQP#NB%`zpb89j1~O<2(&?fqnCv#vas1;s?(D z3{%p@at4OoRhBCd->=_8zvkc9r**WYFFF1te;uu7{O7uOh5QTGpS*Io_yUFafZpGC znk4<7_gi3s>#zmgX_`d!bx`ip+Q-_QR! z(x3L)GCzece7*JF*tyxQ<9Anx{J?5OnHk^tYQHe|OV^(inbs%|W#PvO-hVE+CFVDo z3J-e7Q9q$n?{WV8+TTyiToUOWwzoZz-ZS2J zFIs=H>)W97*DXY6zi$AYzb>Hf;_Ufy=&QD?RQ}fbMEM{W2k;x_G5&e+j%SDNf!DgO z|K;x%?onli_Pk2z4A4d>(^c}|Iz;9YA6^ye>${u%J0{BF8q!he01-8XAyi5SL!2`PLe)xdE_6| zlg`H{72o_m$^Kp$=yd*k^v7%mq{}@-IM5Yzx}RR(^(gM&Z#&n0@VX}*KIqrZTb>=d z?_S^QNN)U!$X@tG{fbh>wa)X$&HeEG$?lJ^RA(TT(xhdlBfIj1?ygX!ScJ`&a+oW{)8U72VcLBt9D*CbeNBe4t&urtIVG? zbigMGw>*56c6B`bF!AxLBE7(8g7J~^@MFYhJbZ!pyuqX0PsLrk&M<$pCx6Zy{r>ny zFf4es+2xkAmw$S(7w|XQtM2WuvYgI$AYV`5^BMD!hLHn5Hy?5BOuwhAaW?aK)c(+a z=-!1*$b9+bZr$()3*)~92tJiZ9ew(0`it#&!teoIvE}HJ#4E0CI}Yk~Nc_MbcBow` zRXkNGFUxy%K;N%@O-QdGA9{4D$GE4*l%ZRc+&1kUeZu-_=DcC}nkark`zbH}XID=4 zj~F`W@1JY2zpDT~ZSpCSkJ@R~@PYnnpGxJoah4NY^Md;AA00jE=ND8oetL` zyU|WX2fk=WIp!A)9qK{G|7boS_T+HLuhQ$EpTK`!8~SJwd$c5&qSK_f3Ca zRO>g--LmQan!Af0e5H?HPBchix8x~JUK{xZ?>qkfYMXjyNvCq)2e}2}XZs!Z{F=S* zQEESf)`fH)XFew^H{broOS>NYmGIhb+ppaVMS|z4=O1}*tJVv5;_tAXQLp%Q&OXVr z{Z+_kC6~WA zPmc=@=&T+~P>);hPhPQV>h#dvR*wh3IC%d4_amQLf78QL_#6Fh-tYt5HuV}X8Q2de zf9mWXW(t1&`r(Yphg~ho>oS#pM-3hN57B`y`iU{-PZ+vzd?ufUhaV=sW$*#tSjWJK z!@BDGdS_3+bvpP#`{YVP2M4I?sb@xtGI(mJ`m z-)R^+_*L_Cl!O1Km><8v*)P1l=S&(r`bT|7q~8@yoBTlc8T~}g}({A2l>t*U&e5wl2_A5Iw|KR_uv*VUqjEA2m!M_Dxo_B9UdcyfJ&s6tdW(RQeBj&$-nc*CwD z@w1)J_3r~w+zg6i?Gt^SMw~c&=Y4zpb^C^s8@v}#uD>3Uy*`@fqaH}|)N%1GXe|-h(9p1kGZ1+E@UHk`vgJDxi5XYuvBYF{0%uH+2>cEgiNc)u|Nb*`cHp&IkDok zkKk|UG2?uP*DvNMZZW9|?*$6}AXu;>1xU;T0de_OwYAAkn9HOim8e7DBU zUqpUbzvS0ps`Hcncc=2Z?#KV+hP#eDlf0Vu^F`|fCxCJA%rAXpZlrO&vRy+t+90CqZec$u2(l1=SjWMk-rMti@e3aG(J#9HBoE9r&U@8D;*sp#wfaK2;B2qhISDK1F=f!&eyBZ4aL&KKSA551$pj zy|{iXX<+nYRrUjE;`{ew(fg;)9qRovw)97D&{_^`#sj|o`=`n|3ip5D>lyRPiqQ|_ zO~adSj55E$RP`mfQ^YU&{d4Z(qdXV%e$M&y+waZ%()snqt*-i=)?{QG?AQEpw(~yP z&ztSMkH&VT+855>>Bh4P^=UALF5!5cb>qJLG|K!oQ{kQeqH{TmI@c4n2k!rAeyn(? z{U#b;5$B~}IX~I&NP*82Uu6pUK|7prey48oAy@l}i#oppI_)R==Wq(Y?bR=NtJBXv zXWWtA%$I)tIh+xbANX>{JhVwZMMDSu{Bt;(r;QuBpg);c?}cMi21cBv$iG8;|NZjd zJ_2u?)VQztfsF%fZ@S&=FN{>xceXWz8!zt@$hp%1kdVgZSmUvM?U{&{0;j? zZlhnBN}j#n5&fm;P!4fXA$@}>@Bv+{X<*nrOt{T-P`~Bx_iH>HdaOK0dtZ=&2koWc zor6u??(FElzdv&yT>R~L3%knXW7`4Z-QPE?kq-LUc-MCx;-B_@H(-k8?0K@lZ*$_m zcKU-~zxZshT*}ZvuGTjtPyKn?&>=oYdf`~vz~MMR{^P{kID<}j;PIAcE%`Pk!(57guV8%XWePh9n1h{pv^lYV^pR`5xOe`KZ4# z;VM)4vuo%A`SV2w`H0hG!`YiU)xYD-++ZT?X|t{d>gv9q`06 zyWTHbG2V{d<@)J5`6v$mdHK{<#!=uhIBSuYB2|RNrT4-4p)7yn6U}cWzaFD|zz#^C*&6_2~TbBBIOiJPYK( zFVaV;&Zms&TmtnfALh>CNw36jd;OsE7-Kx2qI$>}I>=LbrFMPS)Veqg+=eKI)H)-eWw zIJh4p$`AV)>QNwG^{y0gi2f^1zrCOHiJE%?L#PQdra80FQN>RkWi z06p$-Vq)#_OI%zt)rzmv~d>%Ol64BE?(){K;Cmx9O0-qM!)3Arn6Q4DB^m8KyMnBhJe^Dg9-+UMI%I0#t=N)wK zo8nylcK(d+2RNS#{a@SfiZ#E!*Pe$czeRc50}(t+U2xO*6Hg|-kH6vXF7s3CIC~|} z-ZKY(iw@=BkL2$heU>Tkusd&H*j*$4QQ`;LU0=4>?#zPC!}ZA7>^?edvB7=r|Ge+N zZ~tk--$4(wt0v`z8zKQN{@9P+KK-^|tcCor|7O0{hYDRc|IDr$)w|^rZX^U{PdRqk zJu-`}_!9U8_6~K7y+Pf~nCFfB-twC{zK)uF=#>$CoSXm14`aeRx$~##0yvC+<~I!; z@Cm|G29J8`8W{Cdr5%YsIDPxo6ZF%3NZ)a2eqDJwn)icF>r|R2h^}eq;4iI-Dh+Vq zQ{ef0eQzSXQV^j(De_#U@D=KheCVO|Rjog!w|08A3?2N`C2Z#_z!!!8V^oj8=ZMc3 zd>H=*hF?>(ca(VP3H|hh>q*`{v%1f2w)p>SxZ@s+wap z_W9dy6izeXmk#rFzJJj8B|htt&-&Y)x=iWb7ncSIKAEQT%jCt*uez_VxM$?AupLp} zdgOEINx%B-yK62 z=rvz-;2XB5KRLTHOobm|xtxbj5MMBO#7W7(Vf&+h#)Tq7**(G~G3q1;yUuLR(|El1CE|jy9)AJGP@xede z^xf~@zQ^=^IXc&T5f}&0_MhKz^P4{Q>0R(Q;!tt~%YMKC%Ykt?{1D@UDd=IB-b<-Y zENAjzSDX6BiI;y%h7NHkI`BmtR+!%~big;ruj%14#J3F|aTt5p=?%V!!%5XQ@q^;9 z?46&|`6$(!>;+%cOLb!>XD1+nXQLIC+Iqijt~wciBVY6WwSfqpy*~fO_UGKa;nny% zY_HNsDbGFG^H}gx+1L~MgK*p6VRzTSuscsU@rcuNklp@!klu3!*{%1T>tRUnEVb~s zM|NNC8++q#*j1uD{a&c}*?WRum*`L~tbdkkFa;iVH4O~Aa)jGV2ioP$J9WSBAiFfL z+!2Cx61x|?Q-*fwgR8PZ^8Em5j|k( zkNhB(XRL#z9&_|*rl1SQ9q;?vtjUMIF~S{whao?Y8amXs=)f2CJ;wYALkE0Ie)jN1 z;#&rf_~;lI@sT23yyff}6dwhDA7qyEgWB&{Ja8VKZ+z+2>z3Z)`HS&4>O=kTnLq^3 zZ#Vw(dKa8<&pP-Uek}X)ynUA<^&Mxb@nAx5$S3-pp(UutuaDjIjBj4L_ghX*q{rDn z1kZ}U`QoLu55Msg{ze=~4&Z>rj5r|MSmyC4exSd9elTb95eHrBnIvBOE=5C!I1nA= zqrS(PUpI8XH_30(;8EXG21b2nN!KNQP<^+&_c6_z2lWSO?yLNX2aYb>?4@7a^Vw>6 zuORBX@Mq_rm0(ElJhJ8+E1$jKjc{CsKg!J4e6-*Dg5?u-00EzGEjaws7cV^Rqu>cX zlj6hmc=56CCzj8uC>T7sRbSp>|JR-j=S8S@@j)J7=?55bp!XG}ii7kM&dw}T;gzC% z*iU%xEqT%-A9f@NYkn&Kj~hC~hv-laaWKLBmZ1Z_O~14~e3kgvlTrL4ZjuH@+@wjD zCcb~%1m{k_?D*(jKE-vv--`iXy-#XCPUT>ap1^lA-m5D{Kg^5$-+>ureuJs?Km6;z zpQ`_`=RV=L#9y2}sc-iBCqq1RgdJ0qlPBKFlO3pce|^1l@}l3Hr{DjLJm^&;?A@mo zE3E4DY#MshXWPJ`-=C%2ryPBMeWU%?67Pd~YVPQlr}u&aKgPWKf->YcTR*X8#(8DS z&oyuObNIaqg$yDB*AP3*sYqTE74h_;ld=!pPH3&L~rq zM|}A23nh~ey)%S$&O`Rs3?2Ff(Sa}GWs>cY8a(1CZD7RF2MAb;Kj@$%a$ zM_d%nX_!BKZlX!LLk~Q6RnfvPy7yz0`5mUxfqbU@+nnR<`Q+c5_kVo1>JG>UAKmYf z`Rn`h%h+7U=iR5?yY2PEE_+pcbPl1s2tI-SGsfL6>orUL6D&W%w93@UiO&0JT~g~_ zWpnQs;y?a3XOBJa7qrh2dKlGE2mF7%7;<|gZi!aI5I5cYLf_64<%)roR zf_6?AJlbQ!z^IQh=~~1~59p@{bQ*VOyT@PUl_s8z+8@SU|GQ=Ven5tFDhJuHU-wR^ zU2DJ6_TNF78S`wN7t!~1;D`P)wr=mf!GzHd^7Or%>Ra+!h7SJi6867?8zVmTTx2)m zK>Jww4lZNzp}*`_nm75-OW(msAJs?E&>;@Sd*N8!z^KO&>NiQee( zz`psSLpjt#k@OX&z$4CU28P`+!VRYV$DO&0*NW+|AJ#o7I)6OqcNrQFx_(#mUGg9F zy9|@Z_wpZp!P!0NcNyBpIeOjiG(!48zsun3Gn@XSU+mSVPX2@R_uIetA9eUfAJRMz zb$|!wPsUGl{F7~Gr|2IZ{ln|w;*TSprq_A(HucD{+>_ZyzoW5FMZjO@;KxW`BK=y+ z{Cx?HnU-Gf4HbUpRwMl_S1x;&e}5k0M*XcXM?8^&PV)v|f1gh0`h34wx}Z(YxIatx zg~k8w{Fr7s!W8AvZpXdzI4#;&CY^2X&|BmB#4PuSY1|&!)6KsW?^bW{)41H3g-++_ zNB)oZh_z`);zj3&4ATNr=+n=C`o3EB`zgu={mJzG!VSX@{gck8P0#-sKV3tI{wVR1 z(<^>(^qv;>|Gd{>jPx1OK`#8J^O5O)EZV}6-Ky+;f7>i(Jr>4!-tdvy-7@QSnd{oYSgFnplD+LJv8iTcvK zLF+@(zt&qm)*#%zq_@6wug943O*!~ieV5Wa?aYeqAI>k%-k|4V{Ywvx-zh_f@jKrO z$4Ul9oYWcrW5f?S|K{Hpq4kPE~V zaZ>f-B-h+{k>`h0zZ*Mu#WuU`r7y3))ag$HgdY;GIeWGKs(E^OrN|F9PBtN*e3Wz!&jRVE&k)1HM9j6%U^# ze!}1pH&|bZOeN3WzXm^v4&~sFG15<{T!4q&4FkjOB;gj*L3U@n z@BE6Nc6tr6JI(!_)3||pO!|-o3zu8rKIjL#v;T7C*9IbZUc76c)0RDRt?7N40`oQB z()ve%>#rzd`KbRsY5tKnR@U3n6AEps^J5^ng{viM1vIm z{eQiE3D_e=wRY#583=no!MI^imWTpj5d(+>Ml`Z!9D#@m8DJp8G81Nzu!wO%Bb)Jx z5K%9Y%_uGr7a}ewdy3={6h6*F z`5o1;=OaFE>EC~}<%zv~)+G*LNAz#T|0!S|DCMP{lXsc>LfHGD74WyMa-u(<+xR`% zF#Y-5wve5oKZZM3BXf;VUwmxz7plZLpR2gu#&}8NIY;=!t|H3m=PEvDWRPF;$)7$~ z@q3w1^*N*KlQaFkG0%lk&&tWu=LXR;w%OR%x^YT(`}^cOfg{LGgHP-efAKkj*n_{C z;Lln7;x|4|P!IN_lEvrtx|PeeDlWSymdfmz34zg}qFMELdZ z2*mzw{Bq+N-#BJVBX;t?@ay-KGT^^wuj4O^x}3INcE8l?ITNAoA9lZ-wSL2XIdlC6 z>lL%sZ@893)W2WQfPG!y2pE52+COAmOB~=oms$c}27KBt?8md#bJ&k(t>>_R&RWmm z`o&_`bK0-GlQ1K1a8IKkaAI|7s|w`ybzj&m+I>lkc8$K|h|g z{=#*O#jd}MP+$C?)Akj+xK6?6KH4?J`i|J|jejVo*C{6BAM$HH`R@Id-}zhQI!o6l z$9>L&9KD{>gw_M)o{|XJj}DvvHqSJE_!c_oX~%7K`nA8`>y7Zo61~4oIg&5-W&UN# z$4@fI{qF+k!YA`T@=03aq=NjWpU-JqX|X$obPpIbpR>o=WYfIY%=?Yh$IBjPv*4@Y zJyr4u3LnSW;sWx5;vwoB<~^UMfO(+Eb?u(41M2rr(-^P0f5_*EmQ`Nr<2;4P_ei*I zEcM8|UBBNwvgAm+as1_chV{iGMt|t*q>;A2t0DbFzeiuN%1OR{|Jt7C1=&$X`MM=X z^vtREuj!|@#V7q|V5KF#y0AAoH?>Ff8oj{Wrz*&gTlu1w`_H?GDJx&}N#PtU{l)oA z&f*h&O8&G{x6%?{sgb!KG(l&5sNMsaZ&c6r@7v|hG3n}`Pd4j})` zL!a2pIUD&!4?bV$ddMRveqmk2>|;j%%#x{pWggI+^Unif$S(qIJH?+I4;lBg&wgJ` z+Ovc5_IpgOpPivqzt~e_da2RNu8%f(afRo8eg~D~R(qux$As6`kMn7sr_$d+EucPI zKhc}tL9HTR&j(>RuP?}DG_ z(P)3#;&b&{Mn2I?+BJ{-ip3}N2ISQgJr8=*qDvffthB^I6nuTqgYJXU|6?yP=fybR zAnubr|7!X~bd^i^C*M=W?|#L$G=7-%yQ{h$BhmaX?ZI(^$lqNpLB6TqU0;2ge?26F z{5sIqS^Urey}gTxUpt>Vc>SC6Nz9kI&TYr9=(!yV5h+h2&*$(yJL~(`{Jj({$NoNw z#39eykS`PU$06sle4lsn{cDR);%k7kJ)aeN9Q5c`Q@KLtcd!!{UG9(6XLA0>%6D~~ zcYn-T`Qmq;|Dm3|Kb9;$H@=tFthDIE?_jqry7Ystm6rC8{mYCS1JLO=w!NVERnLE7 zk>GKi_Z{BP<6Havlt$Vf*F~>_#V2|V93#IBdXQey-ZQDi5ciLuc5}9w+9~&shI&u81$jyE+4hM2z0;@T zx9E`tUpauEx=1|(RZsLo=GB9er7$pp`PkBJ8rqp!OO3aq-$@4awIMO%loPv$;E!!T^@rGJPG8^k)C$JhO6<;m?$( zdJ7-t!JKDOuAXOhp`Se-iJhEhjx4)`-atCKgRMupZfSE za%n%;KcDLO)UfoEaigH-w&qqZ-+J?v56Yg2t(WM{{h3+wEAF=t`8{0yJE=X?Cz^>Los<2~ zXAR_!fm)x`j>f))evee*m(P)0PvAIf&$oi&oP5~>{r!P{;Jk<9UmwpkVvodkANu89 zKfNCby#>0n(=_gdUIjg_=+P}r{V9ts<3!dF8n=kYC2gdK6`bF9=ruGl((4!lmkLb&BW!C;7{XJ{{kn3U#?W=iljPHhf1BCXfM zxNhH}-c~vB2lp{%?OSpmVT{Fa2VsAuy@{Ru_NI|8S^J#woWS+` zG3qN=<-C3Z{>AQR)-5?=r*6l>HNJj6Y0rUGPTG_EB)p%}K4%xdeQ~7qxlo>~>_BeD zDkpkztS46Chcfu{7Qg7jeNgJb`(oMRbH|&dO@G?yS!pkh(9Z{;(?1g5ykwk6y}^KpA`|bB}Mb850qPOT7MY;^M z>k}Tiy!nSZm&S8}VeP}X+y*zz8*bV8p#wKqdJwtl2<(%&`OxEgQoy}FbKX&RZMtgt zSLAQeL!ZafdK6J#mG$CWa+7IK&Qy;bpvOy5#-%&` zt0sTD?G|A@Oi%2032vLs8`oT#ccq?f{F4C+QS8#|s5vWN{5yjFG0^GXip3}WgM1=a z;;w=GuEi(xF68wUJp=m4qD!1cpJVhExe})>w08pZp#Eg{5BBRi)<;WQP3L36$N3fS zGyEP*eYYu}_!Z6NT3{}I2afX=p^86C>N_hKJIn~fb=i|+M*D=mJ_z%OOc88IXquEi()hQjN4A(ihpJtx}5PhnYW9@TEy)9L5Y8w-G zUC`+_v5S}YJfyy_#_=UAo_Ifb2m&8&p7o3ie;@I-o$Pq}04lln_$zmM&EfBlcO9v>Ehd*z<~qU>IW#=QHD z#69bgJW11jNxLFL`$1(l_=EaE!^#)`W{@rb>EE8k=jySHd?MEy50M{#zP}&D zK~E}r4Svd4bcxfvm6rbDfUg94Q2&rPZK&T>>E3S6sj%JXe&dI^x#+V@d>kSK_qt~D zeFy*kl5PGhe~TabsE@xZ&-q(t<#hfgaYi|ZNkR8I^730>boPyRdBdsryQB1?KEf;Y zBwk?r)!oPFlX;hsp8;L??0OCtf_s%de9@2J``9D@BY%sWD){;P?9_JvdBSJQIYJ2T zb=2iQUvd1a)^C)*CB7(!Y3j!`{UT}Cr}N@(M7?)6cEy0gFaF^95Vx#%C9Hh0qlfbR zeR#HG&f=5!BcBM7_$wj5Zt)4d33*LLFM!@r^fB7KZ_y<#M^;+mvI)NE9>&g~xD-RQnTmmt_qtUmw6Y%KI)2Zb~iXq8tm_Fu=`?z+5HUG_6Pj{gYlObj2(>pLk%VmH<&xZpo8_zQQ7#b zhIPZ(ao}G8KAclYzt*HXCmU>^VlZ*4!2z&#no0Kx2D_^a=5YS6zuKfTMT7Y@29p;U zOsq9HT4%6&p~3hD;3k8yHyO-hpQFQl4(yW@F`w*QZulw{gSoc?v0mSKyGf_7FzCF? z;21b~w@DYSGMK;GVDmi&8}Bt(d7r`Zb-=p8{%4JUOCK=l(TxUsA2Qhan8Dh|4aPrd zaQG>M{ZAY0e#T(qPJ`vo8qBl}#=dCK`Le+=u<=!su5}ESzGbj}kHN~l2Fv#uOnevV z?-^`7U@-YZk~*WqKPT}uHWek$>yt4!B-qYA4ba$-Uyq)~vUc_xp(phssY18`EE7zQJblJPd3E3T&BZ&iy zADep{Ie)$W#`M?jd*2_BzqIoi^Bz3M!M7a$uMH6C)yH=ih&K5ngKs~1jSC4Cl)L|v9JFO|9Uk2RaNziJiA_=YYB?0 zpnChN-i|t_Fp;yb-)>#6Zdb|Y7o=wo^^TREjga_D>_5N#C0=`Ke~JF&^P_E-@ayNyS^TNz2FGKNd^^r&`HlP6 z!@nE(VSeL&50UYhe6G2_M-MQ5DV<^BKZUfkk=WbaDp>zK__TjU%AeFL%wEQG`?IDV z-Y*yrEUO-0m554rifuwBxzHhxu*=`KgcSX~%PYKNHVk_HY~} zHlSx0DDuSrCG|cc>m3EyCG|5d@|XR;jf?C-#*fsi`@G<|D1lG=h3%~Gzc!!y_q=u< zsCo-(UzF_}eMxXTm(;jL{{_XP_`9HfH(?h4U=eW?WFO~y^lL@Q<9&V@VqbfAe>=?5 zx1##zLi~2za~?r{(U(_{UG;J~-_XdAx%BA5Z)J z-`q3UpBeCl)jM2m&NYXPV=PCksd_u=d4+P?GwPi+A7p*R=plZ4b0_%iW&5VU$8zFB zX_x#F!Te$I!};J4`>B*~%a!)yKIg3aIo}8DH5QIDKK~N+{k#SH`oP$m&3)ZD)bF2G zHrU=I_-s4GKMgf5F%ETt##a~$jzuk{G&tSh}9};wJo_GH#9On01 zCS;yb1)uht{+*0jcGc84#<&Xdvu#&*hs8bDreEf_tD(jv_R|9RY`g4wXFWIZ`D)g4 z6UR+r3-$Jup89*j^pA76u_sK=$@%4g=OD3%dg}gc$A|E-KTpnEhsfhRY*v5fyquVa z9Tgzw=S`%0K+#M3*&yV3XAC~uAHpA3-<6sbj|Fw#UWniJBj>+i{fzBQ6OZZ6Wz~zt`iZ9ry0v^WHb(`yQR6On>5d$Mpz3-laq4 zEkl&I>yvgX?D5pw*&Yx0yu&!M<%%6l6RXSpkS%*gpc#i zS^E#XPtDqY;JQ1J_aEmK#-1cF2juvbQ1dVPsSLg_`(~|6@P0t#I^RImUsK}`>yI97 z^bV_^-&1Eii#@#DGV|8CIlnGIuJB4+)t>H;E7o5Psh{f~`niU63rhXen>bMQmehMQ ztT+0~h3!rb&2t?2b-naAk$%rZuJDW9y%4`w0_qq3lH#Y|!^UxE5#xSPf2Dl-PxKD* zYx-6G{_3cC2K`h3pDj=98Z2@=t?cTL7wQ@02ho@9K%~BUeXyeRrrcOII35^>lkdNU z%wIVlo)xduk61*#H6Y_A6%x1Y5ItG{tobwRB{FVfuU74=#$&c`8hm#9+T(G5|AWl$ zQv~=asGYd(Qd9LO)bka`_jW-25?}2_%+rJV0q-~Be_o<5_oaxLV~n4|_M0;y<9re2 zwBHzCoKJ`8!E(edVf!bgWBqX# zJu29aI{0Y6*louh=K-`^@_D&s=8X^RchTeg^=DMvGwxF03#)(TdKJ#^&)T=+yn@L2 zUKRD1zG&8`T1xMhdVhd^=m+R6{-7O1?oW%)BtG=-`f;4h9B=%^a^!D^Jg4HNYTPD&&^ZF(uPyb*5%mv~Uw_u(_%k8;1j)DKbk_bO$7LeN=hg}SIBltU z0{zhkpKhPJYM)vD$S-0%6@Pa^{1Mdtwm;Z!!^S=K10wrF=S1U=u=#c?<8M#;XNYpz zKjlT*TTtT!^$&Vp5&tyQ^Dy-ZiWlL}so%+2NWN>!yz!0Wt{&eyNBjN4IEbwX?$-%r zC-n}RKa1Y6Mch|{^seAsmR{F#)Or#1?uO{?gv=kp#;=}Q525_9_Gzo%6Q0FiJ1E%i zVe$(h_J;ANLdJtI{)+O?EdBNG#Lwhkq(2Lb>>v8~oM-7%QE|-sdRRQ<)p*Ic58HoD zhwz6z4^`Cj5akEm&+Pf?tbJ9EYsArO{r8P@$ohBuq~QLa!gn(%Zy`VX#&vZ*j^$;( z;Ql>tyyALL9eQwHF?x}|-_TE;5Pg#;`S};pSH>$RWWFBMZ|rv9J}=`)^yMY?(OzQt zWPdvhRK1kb03XYVOwm(+kC*p@S^L7X)^Au3F>#90GvvHo7JMv6J?o3OkBUFJ?#Azx zvwi7HLAQ>1-~HfxRX>MymHzto<|uy@qJKf{Gt6oi{X15(;;j?X?}Oq^+P$IpXUT7d z^q0`*Ks67aB|o9=OY~>hzD;@&@gVl<-^rl-pmPWkKV0ACJd*r&{Md0eYaN)+xeKiW zd-BwG_Jit`xaGM6BIjk3=iyULe@g-LzzR_85Wnc}?6bZm_;f!ksre)0IP89xP;oyi z4jRY!$Jxnv6tX_kQS%MzGi$$GpWC(V6#w!$i8y$@@#n1X6VrduHyD0fuK2t2I=_7j z`9tD?>uK7#AB5kFkC1s(9(+2U^2aVN zo+j&p>b#vT*S1T~3vIq2zYd^h^mM;n`RDufWWP><&z39oQ%}CHL4NI5mLpbGy$y9= zp`2Dgz2g6Y;%9q?-A5~mpYamLufO-W5Wo1Bb`iNw%y=oN{zCg|h57wU{K|RJta#^79w7Y}T{T}H@pp6=e_W71%zyfOb>t7)KM?u)yHyMMTlk$t%!}+e zoz+j+e#F!n{{ErAw?w=0;A6RopVj<|{9%5Js&kdI{Gh+9GE07QxxXD}$&ZEH7sB*! zsORj3C zzDySH!<2zdU>{h=`xRYa2Jah`fN`A5Zvm4ypPmO+fo)(E=e*OvB5(kVz0}x~0S+{w%Nq903y< zlb-`tfGywv7(3GNWq>7M1K0yPIM0#-7JxNi66Z+rz#g!La}p_>8)yNO*q?6#`@ksn zw=2LFZ~#nWe|7*YU_Lwm#;_k(2gb0kl>zpFdF z0j5uaUcezRezKuwfgRuoSj6*x9hl4;{yeY>Yy*eD`0F4SSOzwMec%YsWr^1t{v5CZ zYynf4j~9SB%wH=&2lKQFum#MYZshiWPQj#8zyh!Z%&ao`C13;C13G7z{4%f!>;t11 zXVbtUunrsnW!RPX;rn|Vd5NIpYw@JO2w7`iTp_PTvKk;Hut@|cJ8da{G_{I!Tcoh zGcPgkeShq@FMQ`Y$NlO3%+E3(dVJ!h%g!n-shlkNVvqMBO!sdh-}5)`_lq^t7yLbY zAg>C%^r8EP#V0<0p2!owrFSxV^8Q9Te_uh<2iW)LeV_bE{C=zE&qagf^E;(l4uAJZ z%W+VzrVp`?s_E@*=GW``?{R)qfY^s$M!@KKh$CPcm;)Ap6<{6M0@5FC$m?2kX+Q6S zkuDR_`yiN`M*FQ_^QJYc&R@B4{iZWFy5DPf_1d%71-EDRe52>ZKfdAI-@J22?{^BM zJ*%KM_Q!iAuIz>4=FE-j)*rX(;&q!g2G`SpyboXc_uOS$J>q>P%&lkozW?4v57-@< zoLkw)PoJF6u;|hrc>pK$t!vf&kI#WZ(MKq?e7wcpZHzjw#A=v zmN_l8|G@8BxVm~55&BH*RdF1ly*7Ozd*f@3-6K(A2IsW6rH~}-S*QXY;U{WB;L1@irvfBQ}p2XRfyD=NdM^eWxmEC^wD&u zi$GLg(+V8O8sYxYw&<>2o3{~z+>6Nj@ygQbGu=DjnoB0LGRLv! zWw{N;zaJa_^p5*hzUnxU;pWd(KzC((*Y9t6<=np={HHHVLdrLg&w1G&YMJ9t{M2|d z@9H3*^RlZRzV5)r6JGKe+W#Yvy35v>R<9 z^1goNstv38AuMTs${a)9Pv3a&o$vqlo4zU)x%o>IZ!-3i@7|ApuWqz3?Ug}3?Y#NU z+i!~4?Qy5EgZV$d4?|03fb+IPq{r|uNg&aa33b>Cm{#n0?=*V&RxJ4>S#l;`&&`>I_py8iMb zCI0DumP?>q{5z(f6p(HJ52*a*`%4q^%Q@sb5ApRSgMH8s{q8>3NPp4w)xTrD>oWN+ zDf}KQ8~b;A{ae4Vh3j`+E~Uy9FEaIIQSRN(9$dR+#$QhSn%HRgD&V_!c-rkzmrpLq zZ=n7*^4~DL_ol5fUbg4gI{c{p+6VtHPdsAD)+v9z(jNSNH2qqJoH5Eh?N6I`+9ol- zT;&I*9b)I1c&%?Rn7Y{b=j82n-)dXsR~e7`Z!qHs%N4=D?Jqz72j2UPRmSct_#5E+ z@=h;%fX~!&-|B(RbCFWkZIgNPjtuM?fnWH%`31(q=p{yPl;8Yx`NO@4Pcup9q_yi; zySIT=XPm$KsP(JXx;F%lE}p)V@APFM@1D24>*x<|UwFF|clFxL-!mgp{@I(>p1E<& zy0t4eU2wsw^=npdm_Fu7`$sB}*8qP1N1J#2M*W9gHx@ez_+A|6<5HjJpQMQ^P3QQo z>HO}KqR;U;Y`CRqcgp8?nevxT{U`PEdq-N1gZ@{%VmfaV{sh+X8%hqp+oR+-{BDk> z7qI`M=yUvC0$YEH6VB_1@ym=IEU(kBdyez!6!_^6en+P0r_br%#}Ot*_>z{(Syu`SqN9FDChBe|z$~CzMBfJ2HKbpqR;8y0jD4Md_ZKmhF_1l z$@8E^7eBHbae#cvq1}vwu`18@CnhfU#{uOKDUb8{H2CQkeg~zb==@%Yk~8_v2lb|$ z2F}N5ety5frn`RF%y|!y_FS@hz4xtnk?V~oxF0%iF?Jrf;+E51^`TSmM!j=M(7B%{ zbn!Fm3&SkRQ4ZH93Vyo7?+er{y2xigAnJM;51Jm9UTlBpSo+Ag6vzAg>59KU@V$3U z=lkS}KG*-I8Hcq$8LvdzQTNw3$LHXdpYHJe^1h<;{cg%bdraQr)^Rq#{w&8E^4GA> ztL5;$T}|(W@H==9M33)$pHunEseoV0cc7=H^Zhza=lgG(&iBbQo$pK8bcsv$BjQty zE8ZvaZ}Z1b3+M1^ir&WgCA)r!L%z49{lxc^bbGc!+JW!mX!(3EM$-!+{^op3^Yc9t zW!GH!hW)+gNBh1XrsF)Dk~8_;Yfb05FYOO0^7hIa0qlT&#eG6nE&O0 zC190^d0PY62KInMU=#C&9PYnGU7(5j)5`UKa#)< zunFt{`@j(}it#Z4OapVkBCrB<-eL5Q15>~(umCIrYrrP31MCAwz$p4<0+7(2H_wE0D@3$np<$hiTJ^hyHbFkFM#bM%(=nrSCI`h1XR;@ql z6|2u)ec_QCH?9X=z^<zp0;S@{317j;pWuXAC>y zSNX=N&~p_V+>Lp6$z=7~4ela}80}u-mpc4AfSmWa8J5Hj zyANJ~eBKAzNIw9@`>K8^=lwnq=u9WCnfh7$lHXwT(e`s6h?qq=ZT~F0XXT4t;+Hz& zhkkkalH}VYPcHF`&KJ7p7wAR5^pK`sMo3exloP*1ubuiq(itl)e&Kwc_DeZe#=P?? zjEi1KTofRe_0K}7NBogp?vIm?zy0!0NuFHd51lV`@kbf;(H{e(=?~{U#%}5%<;4Ct z=uGFVw9EVW4wB(sM8<=*d$IN|mS1!b{}fYx|NQFP-@H)raZ7;uT-IKC4ZFQs>y`vL1A)>QqZ|NlZ!Rs5MzAt zc0iVPh(C3{>NV9$^C-$d7 zXS!si#UI=^(f3i#ABgP#Vg9J8`l$y|>KFS{>U$Es7k=#;$&*X$*ZD&C`YYs5?0>(q zA8ETj&wkKFj-*RgTI}b!8m>nRpDW{W`hz&repSD%huB@l^E~O>{_43^sY@=gTjvYi zvm0`0_ZVr8`|<08`#}nHkt22&t+d$3`yr9zly2X}#`$9TML+S+NPYKaR2_a_^5hc# z=zO7zf2y#H{)ykPdQa@HEBle2XFup7NBmK>(qg}NAj!=mhT0zz_q7nZ)F<{v)prvAUivMM zGJEZ<^QD|;FZ86n(GU3TO(L!B&44a)#NM)%mT`dlK$Z?>h?hAEQFY70Y zJh6L>=Tg#t^WIHd((>%q`BF~oZb3fnc5d|Boj{s$rJUHA2A%1Wm3DdOJr}T@Y2Pfn zX5~x0Vs`@1*VOM#yInPza!UW!`BF~ou0dbgJw|#m{(aE+fpVps*qs8M>7tdE_U1Wn zwyW@oKbR)6y|Y#SJfN!TW&K2vCw7n2`=^h-<+{5hPcCmNe>D=qf%d?be_AiyW~#XQjnHwlk6KP5WlqH7j50_4>E^K3n~at=}bi za(Vq*aa7*yY3@+#e;fz02?R_wS-5 z&$I72{&;@Px4(40)Ge21pUM}y7tfGG``Sp;zCO~no?_3)s$bH{#?)T1kMBX~{Rz%v ziDC9-AcLI|22HU476+j-+EBnc6As#q+X6 z#xL7T+o97USL~`k&2QJi+iw3y$&*X$()mJ{_Dew@+EqrHcGZ!#{U~;{EITAUw9?Xk zJTJj^lKO(|W&6dh^v7rPX8(9#*YCya%l-B?9{bjBr4G5gcvbmA7kd+sOM8n*)84A8 zSIUWf4bYkHTWPV2&yhs7Bkc;aCyXxjh@DyW-L%idpL?a`$t8B`e4&e-W9UaabGI0O z(#{gnwqM20D(E6d(j6=9wJY8;;d6uViTxaZiEP)VYFE}bQ1z1@hEk9CBe%D|-49>- z%o`+6F7b!X7rN&U)JK05ZuR@4f;8)wa$&eV1<*51YPi+tZFW2UV~xQo-|98PCIYJQvpSyi~>WLk08aGUk&d%&&@=ZxnF9&Ex))#`v7T z_%#L&(SLe~n*rPXcH%Sq#-&Ud#I zk6W{0`a-GOev|#O=toUGhg3KH`H7F7c&8K>fAT$8VstmtANYI0JolT&`^r40n_6o4 za`+x~d~2k!e#vu@4u0>fy~55i(o@>iuzmVs+DhC_>7}mddj%)Z*Lm%L~WHqdV zq#(DuoykvNU$Ou>JipO;iOCoH#ornDr2rJV_^t6`^WF3k_8WKo=9>!Z9(lg^UX!#3 z&#V)9)_wW9wHv&*h}{<9Npg`_ZW{mBfrImY_}gRlUvrAow~)M*rB&-UtX?i}y_~pK znB7a{bs=X6eA%@>IOy4}*Lk;nH-9evF;kx_+q>SlXS;G-;-Lp5A?4G^=X+Vh6JLMw z&+quiBtMUQ+Q0kC{SNy0A0PJK`w)G3-kr#E?;C7={jX7b^_C&G4&3rLH=lUulYg4T zBlRWnJg(@SlpZ=2V@{aqf9 z$f4at-X~YP`W(68==0Z1q#1c*$cf)!{Bi2x+r90y>t6axsn3-+@Arq;@7dqkFWC>- zpQOC_Eep9tpwPt*?$>8eHT&|7bbr-WCmr+y$rn4gUPk16=bZIx)}Cd(GeLPB$R7Y3 zkvo3ynRmQ(f6CiY{%|j%`^t)Uz1|ae`dRDNZaj0<`qgg)*#ptj)y2C~pD_Npp!mse zym{$O|0P5>e`yhP@||_YE{~cLUjDM?tIY3^R>61MD^mL}$rui|{IWLQ|6+dXn}_U4 zS(4vHIlia$*XR8DuDQgt{1EwkPiy1V7hkf(%5Ne+`bnezcV8J>w=`qQyX_N6g3dZ6 z$GyMK@w^1n{GJ5UJU1a}ky8nfBlHsJH6Zy5NH;CI+}C;j!PF!FPp_PN8iVr&o_}C` zWFe;m>;s2D+dfKk>svBLzR;xp?5C#Vg7`mwvU!h*?Q>N7$nKJYaGUl`{KUKu#r!qt z&I;Bg<*Sf4xWL?Bw%qlx3+6IX8u5Yr_*#?yzBgn_OEO-zxcXM=MSIwRddO}tJ3p- z?=7ZX*uEeB_ucQKuf+dF$SdA#`0hF8yzk9*rsb>1&wRw>H@~&lJxi?oCh~j#Zt`D$ z;-|JaEkS@}ccm)>v6KlH)Wc3W8a(a#ur`^evP;g2d?TKP%jC$2T+ z|GLGEzl~b?S>*FQ)hD)$ZNHV3Uqn9R`;$9g_CH%&`BmgIzW3kjJ6msKy=tNNm!^~d+%4s#x#@q5$v zZ(P5mAljJmCwY@;cjlkF>&3sJuOz;+kjM7TzNoQwE+eH)`6BY!zQs#U_{oxtm+eUT zD)QOBpFHfL%k1&1iF~&2C)!`W#~#0u$nOF#TfNsK_V_gfojOa+(!QJzGHuTnr5#hB zn;#cKPk^2QN_nBPee)Jw+Lz}HgwJkYo-5$^6-BucunL^jzI9dK&`OJc(>;It{_`CV zKW_VfbdJA$Z+PLee@0(P`Q+z~AJ{%$ee%g&?D<6&`D~wOU-8ao+VhJj@{7QoPk7!t z*}mepD(I|J{3Pwe^AeI4zD@w2-5x#Ulb`J|wCK_vJog}czV>*(v6J(KCd+-n(Br^a z?U4kZ$d~%cR$Ba7Z|>*4|HA%s_k(BNy2O1STQ12TKI)$@WOx4I{q&9Gw;_-IzUJQN zylD=TRZl+h`@rk3f9Z;)kT3okgHD-JulSqiGbAm1sk>&xKk~^>f9EZ_XFtwk2%qh5 zp0D73P#on-z$$Q-zw4^Lp_O)R4E-L2H?0??+{^XbWF8-F8@nIg@aKC!|N9j`lYEiG z=OrSao6cFkZqwScPA{$6D4gaJc`3-r0Uum`!-~^xT;386*S}5$^bEc`2YRFdy4^mm zysg`ycW*b(Lr32JroWR%+I@`k%RTU&ckIJIoipl)eUtL7v>6YcR^NK1U4Ddeu`e3? zZ~N3Smo1r=UzP&B_H7ftr`FH?q8(Q`gSqq@{(7NE~SmO-?J#U^2Bf79OU=GvV(PojJVILq%jRbRtO+kWp*PH-Nef@>s|)vs1oBbd{Vqjtf8ahd>l;%ql+OWYwM#+O*Rs;$ciLUQ%;?cS z>%ouk`%hv|5B$`Fc60xlc1QnXVY}nVr`_C#mb4v@+;?W%jZl9I<+H$9cIQ=nO)G7W z1L?Dk-5(h4o}!I*Ja$p;fOShdLGjrB#R1;D>*vFpZnet~Q7+mse);tCcRh_ZiTot! z#Y0RyJJqNCdTBzuVd5x@e99EMjK3x9Q;@F`z-NyGHRPkblfb^Qq;0rIFeC-#0 zUsm`$KVcu2<(dKIL|z^AHjwBuLcgd>X^_LUF zx^BgyyLxSoiNfwh={3;+3w z;!(mN-(O{4;dh4^m!uOlKj$aBpOKG9e&*+Ku7vqT=u-!hpZOKMk2p&o=JUJCeEu6l zF6B`^pV#|0n(=`7UGOKrIqgTbf3kQllKdJepY-bSX1t?*q!Y={e6CkfKk~JeKD3YD zYhw8-_=bvqB4_u->66>i&!7F4@eAcqf5u-U;pdNozYHWl*Tc9zKzs7gyQ%nDAHT!H zeos1)@|o^p|C#@C!I+BsqYBqRGB7U{@cO*C9{K(PkqQwq7Z-tn$qf5sQT7sU8%gFmbI886jSj6RfK1%Fxb?hxEc8etStLYWbZ5 zg4?UEceyv=Z~4zNPfy|;(Q7DlK*M^k_VEX`40H$ zU($)1pWjbnzDDv>pGwT{&o=ZJhUin@`Kh%R{mthN))&9m*qa4XAAX0Rhxt9@y9zzZ zil6U$7Jp#$;W?5q+O?_pPnU|^tMn_w&-$X^?<;=#Eq<0+uhI8Y=8H`G{@ysr$Y*~i zACdg@2fsf@d(-zB{}h4bXZb$jjrx;L)chmNA6Osxh~#H}0`K=S-n!6Z9HI}uLq&ed zB~tz*9&R-LVf!WTNBjfHPy6_NK>DW+J*tYI_3`^xv;0r~!p>%Vo7KMbPh(%BKhF;i zp-23?#t!OF`J;PG{4lLi^E<~G`8=l=#!r3teJ$Esh8|6&5AW{emwHJX+2aq-U(jFVBa)x?)t?uv&oD%P zp7-I)WRy#!e6|nwSJ{8#4;a5>f#hd==G1#bZRk-}{G9(+@ZHLlBFMe+;BPAaBTcqb zc+mKh<4+px)mQwqCx!K!r|M4!=LR{Sqnz~jgX4kgL$l;lPG_TuXSN^dL@`t1f%5wQ zX6z+@9eQ+?K8#;}M~~%;;2SG`);GZO2-6y=59@Co>(__;`5y%Phrb_0eaKIwe5PBU z4wlb+&Cl=LQ9tq#$5t%eTRwRs4(>zDGs*Rq&S;KjXKC z{XVu|68ufYPkH?AF#9LzMA}P#q;O7}`bQr$c4~g68;=K%C(PIK`8__?R}7I)fATv- z>qL-yrNLhZ3e6r52RLWW`ZbcD^=Gl3!}K^rAIjl(0Lf1}QOh6gX#BI6WVjdk^8Xba zKRjPY|0ls$Rs5VU@OOF1--Z5d#m{>A{lTZIfAnw@&nzE*XyJI^cL2$+QG8&xSLW$P z{;c?{`Vn2cY)zwj&v0Fp{nA44Ea27%=n4od7*9bM*`0A53PJz zH_u`nH~!5igDk?t${ z2>uxP>67mQ==d2vFED;4=Rp*IB=^db;(5lJ9j@zb3?)*rO|7WkBW$9YAt zo`t;(UHg9=EGIGmJ@)fy``Y&!1dqR1D1&P%v&nT6aAuoWVo`+l?HnezzlTecAg1IUd%;_okfj^Vy;9r0g6xs1i{ z-5>BfHMak!yZsQC{m)0==Q+7enR;O^nxC{xC#-k8*$Mv)9R-8mvG4Z?}{9CyVl0 z{}kv2OTHc7+}AE6pK(oOf9_*FPTSQ9sh9fnL+a)4@r)Lz*X~!`kB)=C28{mq)Nj*x z{mWz?!g0E2@ktzWoYr)X(~2HxqP+HR4fKv*ex!_a-=f=o=l&H={%>V=#dfh(0=TL z9{u&y9*OG?=m|w{f}U3N8t6GiFN0q6(n~0L`_$SGMewOOaq`&L(EN4q z>-%00K6R72<_70Yx`E79fCPB{wMZO)MJpWQc zKHHT@eM;K|*6Z{`o@;s``m{kGTKY`ySJ4dXV|>Sd=WEwU5^1~rYF=YdL)OTMg<&;381uWF%xw&BmR#V_r8^}e#w^yH*nD_BqJ zTYS<^L!?#vP5P0Jg8|kPR2)q1gNh!>{xNtQNP%7eieE&ZIMQW5-6`X{GKHY=vhDA8DJmNj(@pto#b7Ao!qygc%PxB%EvJO)AUx-*suH* z>7l$D7b0!Yhkp5y2Gf7_+g}Df?x#D{)3(QpgOGVD^;Gc@DMPN-vjBR{UvDIfbkm}X zAMd|Uu76DYIKVn$-{KSfTCWX`7w7Tdcp0L69QlZg$vjQl&v}|^kI6hu(Ie%MdJCY} z{Pjk%NH;CIJzny>X$ScnXNc6F{YL2@iT*9v4_v2DAYbIz_41r(8u_e`NPdpfJhz&H zo_%00L_W`zavn&zM9Swl%5$zAv|j~sTb6u@2ku8IKRBE}+Vtu3!xkB-Ps($DHZ%73 zn;gMi5FQ$>$-QC`>E0)3$5b6nEnXKeHQII!EB=U$WG zV>=M(pFzldzZ4+f?w@*`<2tnNKkZ;Skp}2Jpy*@k&vUXv*qXIJFCCZ9-gaRXr3nevw!kjZ4-KQfFnzP z;phGi&neeoZvlLXC;a~5IZd9+PN9De&@Xcqzw4g}pPMp#K6M*L=zMN!`S~aBcPf8Q z<{O&M`G%rLV*i*Q|5EQ5^(B!naU%2q=ovrV;ku1}p6B|idTyW0+Z8?12+^ksdfQ)b zq=axkCSzqn#Cvn zZ3O5i{5*%D?3tXy&~%=|Q1poN903ZK)Pem?e^n2@ILa{ZbY$5_&MJ3+;vv*k3!`0Tr}6sDVIq393Ocu zx(z=j{$>211CpQXKs@(8L_8Nzu43^^JaB(P`*Q$3bzgKiFID_bHu$_tB>aBv__SYLJA>Fg+c0BN$`4IVRCnEjNc;Gqh zJmp1 zMLnlDBRrRBI@e|N{3$mV94Beei$LfZNg!RZ=(c}&ZoH0s`h`e)J9uA6`+tCPoWHPr zS)S+K#|y|8eK7V>jhb<_CE1nCCw_@P9_}?ct2_Kys4i<<4cX5DWK>q@;T48<6P)mM=MzTcKh<& zdl~s`7b4_4T({Eg+d(C+4~OI{4@pBK0W*$NyygRL99USkK4+^w<{ucxHV(C!a(<=|s`T_9xFp7a_L= z%vkazo_TIZw{HV{cKZrH*E1CV)3%M79^t=W6|VK3CIuK3CBr9n_=GWi>(XTY5@=tRX$J=(hfRk02T~excq(-M)OU zp$)$jAUA>XjFeuk`adf44)^`Fy45k)0wo|*M-0rA{ zSjF#tjP^0V|B*Vt;Na^9hu<{VzsF!=FY`N7$(I;xzSLm(NQ1o#4JIx(n8)vlRNrCJ zt*Z f ∈ facets) facets := by + exact ⟨hne, fun _ h => h, fun f hf => + ⟨(checked f hf).1, canonicalArticulated f (checked f hf).2, + canonicalFacetArticulated f, (checked f hf).2⟩⟩ + +theorem canonicalGroundsForSingleton {W : Type} (f : Facet W) (checked : FacetDischarged f) : + Grounds f.claim canonicalArticulation (fun g => g = f) [f] := by + refine ⟨by simp, (by intro g hg; cases hg; simp), ?_⟩ + intro g hg + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hg + subst g + exact ⟨rfl, canonicalArticulated f checked, canonicalFacetArticulated f, checked⟩ + +/- A mode selects whether a system applies or waives the modeled governance rule. -/ +inductive Mode | apply | waive + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- The four hypotheses vary algorithm and governance independently for the same assessed system. -/ +abbrev World := Candidate × Mode + +def actual : World := (.identity, .apply) + +/- A method's form and its possible executable realizations belong to one object. -/ +structure Method where + form : Form + realize : World → Implementation + +/- System fields identify the owner, its method, its current principle form, policy and work. -/ +structure System where + owner : Nat + method : Method + principleForm : Form + governance : World → Mode + requirements : Requirements + +def policyFor : Mode → Policy + | .apply => openPolicy + | .waive => neutralPolicy + +def workFor (owner : Nat) : Mode → List WorkRecord + | .apply => completeOwnWork owner + | .waive => [] + +def System.policy (s : System) (w : World) : Policy := policyFor (s.governance w) +def System.rules (s : System) (_w : World) : List Principle := ownRules s.owner +def System.work (s : System) (w : World) : List WorkRecord := workFor s.owner (s.governance w) + +def actualSystem : System where + owner := 0 + method := ⟨⟨.method, 0⟩, fun w => implementation w.1⟩ + principleForm := ⟨.principle, 0⟩ + governance := Prod.snd + requirements := identityRequirements + +def systemCapability (s : System) : Claim World := + fun w => ∀ n, s.requirements.inputs n → (s.method.realize w).run n = s.requirements.expected n + +def systemBudget (s : System) : Claim World := + fun w => (s.method.realize w).cost ≤ s.requirements.budget + +def systemObservation (s : System) : Record World := + ⟨fun w => decide ((s.method.realize w).run 0 = s.requirements.expected 0), true⟩ + +def systemHeld (s : System) : Theory World := + union (singleton (systemCapability s)) (singleton (systemBudget s)) + +inductive Question | correctOutput | affordable + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def systemContext (s : System) : Context World Question := + ⟨singleton (Compatible [systemObservation s]), + (fun q => match q with | .correctOutput => systemCapability s | .affordable => systemBudget s), + fun w => (s.method.realize w).domain 0 ∧ w.2 = .apply⟩ + +abbrev capability := systemCapability actualSystem +abbrev observation := systemObservation actualSystem +abbrev held := systemHeld actualSystem +abbrev context := systemContext actualSystem + +/- The output observation identifies the algorithm, without identifying its independently varied governance mode. -/ +theorem observationIdentifies (w : World) : Compatible [observation] w ↔ w.1 = .identity := by + rcases w with ⟨candidate, mode⟩ + cases candidate <;> simp [Compatible, observation, systemObservation, actualSystem, + implementation, identityRequirements, identityImpl, successorImpl] + +theorem capabilityActual : capability actual := fun _ _ => rfl + +theorem observedCapability : Supports [observation] capability := by + intro w hw + have hid := (observationIdentifies w).1 hw + rcases w with ⟨candidate, mode⟩ + change candidate = .identity at hid + subst candidate + exact fun _ _ => rfl + +def capabilityFacet : Facet World := .empirical [observation] (fun _ => True) capability (fun _ => True) + +theorem capabilityFacetChecked : FacetDischarged capabilityFacet := by + exact ⟨⟨actual, (observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl, trivial⟩, + (fun w hw _ => observedCapability w hw), fun _ _ => trivial⟩ + +theorem capabilityGrounds : Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet] := + canonicalGroundsForSingleton capabilityFacet capabilityFacetChecked + +theorem actualAdmissible : Admissible held context actual := by + refine ⟨(modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨(modelsSingleton _ _).2 capabilityActual, + (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by change 1 ≤ 1; decide)⟩, + (modelsSingleton _ _).2 ((observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl), trivial, rfl⟩ + +theorem jointConsistent : Consistent held context := + consequenceConsistency held context ⟨actual, actualAdmissible⟩ + +/- The current method/principle forms, judgments, rules and own work are read from this very system and world. -/ +def Charter (s : System) (w : World) : Prop := + Generative (s.policy w) ∧ Consistent (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) ∧ + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (s.policy w).current s.method.form ∧ (s.policy w).current s.principleForm + +theorem charterChecked : Charter actualSystem actual := + ⟨⟨Or.inl rfl, fun _ _ => trivial⟩, jointConsistent, completeOwnWork_reflexive 0, rfl, rfl⟩ + +/- Revision adds a supported input-specific assertion about the same system's realized method. -/ +def revisedHeld : Theory World := union held + (singleton (fun w => (actualSystem.method.realize w).run 0 = actualSystem.requirements.expected 0)) + +def initialSnapshot : Snapshot World Question := ⟨held, context, 0⟩ +def revisedSnapshot : Snapshot World Question := ⟨revisedHeld, context, 1⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem revisionKeepsConsistency : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ Consistent revisedHeld context ∧ + TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot true ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport initialSnapshot revisedSnapshot false := by + refine ⟨charterChecked, consequenceConsistency revisedHeld context ⟨actual, + (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨actualAdmissible.1, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + actualAdmissible.2⟩, (fun _ => rfl), ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h (Or.inr (by decide)) + cases bad + +/- A claim about this system's method is assessed as its owner's system claim. -/ +def OwnCapabilityDuty (s : System) (w : World) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + Performed (s.work w) (.system s.owner) .assessment ∧ + Grounds (systemCapability s) canonicalArticulation (fun f => f ∈ facets) facets + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem ownCapabilityGrounded : + OwnCapabilityDuty actualSystem actual [capabilityFacet] ∧ capability actual := by + refine ⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, capabilityActual⟩ + · exact ownAssessmentPerformed 0 (.system 0) (by simp [ownSubjects]) + · exact canonicalGrounds capability [capabilityFacet] (by simp) + (by intro f hf; simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hf; cases hf; exact ⟨rfl, capabilityFacetChecked⟩) + +/- This cost observation is true of both algorithms but does not discriminate their output behavior. -/ +def costAllowanceRecord : Record World := + ⟨fun w => decide ((actualSystem.method.realize w).cost ≤ 2), true⟩ + +def unsupportedCapabilityFacet : Facet World := + .empirical [costAllowanceRecord] (fun _ => True) capability (fun _ => True) + +theorem costCompatibleWithFailure : Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] (.successor, .apply) := by + intro r hr + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst r + rfl + +theorem costDoesNotSupportOutput : ¬ Supports [costAllowanceRecord] capability := by + intro h + have bad := h (.successor, .apply) costCompatibleWithFailure 0 trivial + cases bad + +theorem unsupportedGrounds : ¬ Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] := by + intro h + have discharged := (h.2.2 unsupportedCapabilityFacet (by simp)).2.2.2 + exact costDoesNotSupportOutput (fun w hw => discharged.2.1 w hw trivial) + +/- Five separately adopted requirements govern distinct operations; the mode does not give them priority over one another. -/ +inductive Commitment | generation | consistency | reflexivity | grounds | choice + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A Grounds policy governs arbitrary claims, articulations and applicable facets, rather than only one capability claim. -/ +def groundsPermission (mode : Mode) (claim : Claim World) (a : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + match mode with + | .apply => Grounds claim a applicable facets + | .waive => True + +def GroundsProvision (mode : Mode) : Prop := + ∀ claim a applicable facets, groundsPermission mode claim a applicable facets → + Grounds claim a applicable facets + +theorem groundsProvisionMeaning (mode : Mode) : GroundsProvision mode ↔ mode = .apply := by + cases mode with + | apply => exact ⟨fun _ => rfl, fun _ _ _ _ _ h => h⟩ + | waive => + constructor + · intro h + exact False.elim (unsupportedGrounds (h capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] trivial)) + · intro h; cases h + +/- The consistency policy checks a whole same-context theory, not isolated judgments. -/ +def consistencyPermission (mode : Mode) (t : Theory World) (c : Context World Question) : Prop := + match mode with | .apply => Consistent t c | .waive => True + +def conflictingHeld : Theory World := union (singleton capability) (singleton (fun w => ¬ capability w)) + +theorem conflictConsequences : + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput true ∧ + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput false := by + exact ⟨fun w hw => hw.1 capability (Or.inl rfl), + fun w hw => hw.1 (fun w => ¬ capability w) (Or.inr rfl)⟩ + +theorem conflictingHeldInconsistent : ¬ Consistent conflictingHeld context := + conflictRequiresChange conflictingHeld context .correctOutput conflictConsequences.1 conflictConsequences.2 + +/- The selection policy applies the actual output/budget and relevant-reason conditions to every implementation. -/ +def choicePermission (mode : Mode) (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Prop := + match mode with | .apply => JustifiedChoice req i reasons | .waive => True + +/- The following consequences are computed from distinct rule applications; they are not interchangeable support flags. -/ +def proposedOperation : Mode → Operation + | .apply => .successor + | .waive => .copy + +def selfSamples : Mode → List Nat + | .apply => [0, 1] + | .waive => [1] + +noncomputable def conflictDecision (mode : Mode) : Bool := + @decide (consistencyPermission mode conflictingHeld context) (Classical.propDecidable _) + +noncomputable def groundsDecision (mode : Mode) (facet : Facet World) : Bool := + @decide (groundsPermission mode facet.claim canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = facet) [facet]) + (Classical.propDecidable _) + +noncomputable def choiceDecision (mode : Mode) (i : Implementation) (reasons : List Reason) : Bool := + @decide (choicePermission mode identityRequirements i reasons) (Classical.propDecidable _) + +theorem decisionsApply : conflictDecision .apply = false ∧ + groundsDecision .apply unsupportedCapabilityFacet = false ∧ + groundsDecision .apply capabilityFacet = true ∧ + choiceDecision .apply cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = false ∧ + choiceDecision .apply identityImpl objectiveReason = true := by + classical + simp only [conflictDecision, groundsDecision, choiceDecision, consistencyPermission, + groundsPermission, choicePermission] + exact ⟨decide_eq_false conflictingHeldInconsistent, + decide_eq_false unsupportedGrounds, decide_eq_true capabilityGrounds, + decide_eq_false eligibleInternalReasonNotSufficient.2, decide_eq_true identityJustified⟩ + +theorem decisionsWaive : conflictDecision .waive = true ∧ + groundsDecision .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet = true ∧ + choiceDecision .waive cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = true := by + exact ⟨@decide_eq_true (consistencyPermission .waive conflictingHeld context) + (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial, + @decide_eq_true (groundsPermission .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet.claim canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet]) (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial, + @decide_eq_true (choicePermission .waive identityRequirements cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity]) + (Classical.propDecidable _) trivial⟩ + +/- Each application supplies its own outcome type, adopted objective, constraints and actual option-indexed reasons. -/ +noncomputable def commitmentPositionFor (c : Commitment) (chosenMode : Mode) : ValuePosition World := + match c with + | .generation => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Operation, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => proposedOperation mode, + objective := fun op => op.run 0 ≠ Operation.copy.run 0, + constraints := fun _ mode => Generative (policyFor mode), + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ mode => (proposedOperation mode).run 0 = 1 ∧ Operation.copy.run 0 = 0], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => ¬ Expanded baseState inflatedState, + response := fun _ => some "Pursuing expansion does not guarantee it; assess the actual before and after capabilities separately" } + | .consistency => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => conflictDecision mode, + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => consistencyPermission mode held context, + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput true ∧ + Consequence conflictingHeld context .correctOutput false], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => ¬ Entails (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) (fun w => w = true), + response := fun _ => some "Consistency alone does not establish sufficient support; assess the claim with its grounds as well" } + | .reflexivity => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := List Nat, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => selfSamples mode, + objective := fun samples => ∃ n ∈ samples, ownArithmeticPrinciple n = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => Reflexive 0 (ownRules 0) (workFor 0 mode), + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 1 = true], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => selfTest [1] = true ∧ ownArithmeticPrinciple 0 = false, + response := fun _ => some "A passing self-test does not certify the principle; retain the relevant counterexample and its scope" } + | .grounds => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => groundsDecision mode unsupportedCapabilityFacet, + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => groundsPermission mode capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet], + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] (.successor, .apply) ∧ + ¬ capability (.successor, .apply)], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => OutputContract outputOnlyProcess ∧ ¬ ExplanationContract outputOnlyProcess, + response := fun _ => some "Grounds allows an external output assessment without requiring this process to provide an internal explanation" } + | .choice => { + Position := Mode, Outcome := Bool, adopted := chosenMode, selected := actualSystem.governance, + outcome := fun _ mode => choiceDecision mode cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity], + objective := fun accepted => accepted = false, + constraints := fun _ mode => choicePermission mode identityRequirements identityImpl objectiveReason, + starting := singleton (fun w => actualSystem.governance w = chosenMode), + reasons := [fun _ _ => cheapSuccessor.run 0 = 1 ∧ identityRequirements.expected 0 = 0 ∧ + cheapSuccessor.cost ≤ identityRequirements.budget], + limits := fun w => w.1 = .identity, + relevantCriticism := fun _ => identityImpl.conventional = true ∧ identityImpl.established = true, + response := fun _ => some "An existing conventional method remains eligible when actual output and budget reasons justify it" } + +noncomputable def commitmentPosition (c : Commitment) : ValuePosition World := commitmentPositionFor c .apply + +/- The fact used as a reason has content before evaluating the adopted rule's consequence. -/ +theorem positionReasons (c : Commitment) : + ∀ r ∈ (commitmentPosition c).reasons, r actual (commitmentPosition c).adopted := by + cases c <;> intro r hr <;> dsimp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor] at hr ⊢ <;> + rcases List.mem_singleton.mp hr with rfl + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact conflictConsequences + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · refine ⟨costCompatibleWithFailure, ?_⟩ + intro h + have bad := h 0 trivial + cases bad + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl, by decide⟩ + +/- Each adopted rule has its stated consequence in this explicitly defined application; this is not ultimate value justification. -/ +theorem positionConsequence (c : Commitment) (w : World) : (commitmentPosition c).consequence w := by + cases c <;> dsimp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor, ValuePosition.consequence] + · exact ⟨by decide, ⟨Or.inl rfl, fun _ _ => trivial⟩⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.1, jointConsistent⟩ + · exact ⟨⟨0, by simp [selfSamples], rfl⟩, completeOwnWork_reflexive 0⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.2.1, capabilityGrounds⟩ + · exact ⟨decisionsApply.2.2.2.1, identityJustified⟩ + +theorem positionProcedure (c : Commitment) : ValueProcedure (commitmentPosition c) := by + refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · cases c <;> simp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor] + · refine ⟨actual, ?_, ?_, ?_, positionReasons c⟩ + · cases c <;> exact (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl + · cases c <;> rfl + · cases c <;> rfl + · intro w _ _ _ + exact positionConsequence c w + · intro w _ _ + cases c <;> exact ⟨_, rfl, by decide⟩ + +/- Criticism is instantiated within the adopted position's actual limit rather than made vacuous. -/ +theorem criticismWithinScope (c : Commitment) : + (commitmentPosition c).limits actual ∧ (commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism actual := by + constructor + · cases c <;> rfl + · cases c + · simp [commitmentPosition, commitmentPositionFor, Expanded, baseState, inflatedState] + · exact consistentIncomplete.2.1 + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact ⟨outputNotExplanation.1, outputNotExplanation.2.1⟩ + · exact ⟨rfl, rfl⟩ + +/- Waiving the rule changes the actual computed outcome or an explicit adopted constraint; old reasons cannot certify it unchanged. -/ +theorem oppositeConsequenceFails (c : Commitment) (w : World) : + ¬ (commitmentPositionFor c .waive).consequence w := by + cases c <;> intro h + · exact permissionNotValuation.2.2 h.2 + · have bad : conflictDecision .waive = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.1] at bad + cases bad + · obtain ⟨n, hn, hf⟩ := h.1 + change n ∈ [1] at hn + have he : n = 1 := List.mem_singleton.mp hn + subst n + cases hf + · have bad : groundsDecision .waive unsupportedCapabilityFacet = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.2.1] at bad + cases bad + · have bad : choiceDecision .waive cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] = false := h.1 + rw [decisionsWaive.2.2] at bad + cases bad + +theorem oppositeProcedureRejected (c : Commitment) : ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor c .waive) := by + intro h + obtain ⟨w, hs, hl, _, hr⟩ := h.2.1 + exact oppositeConsequenceFails c w (h.2.2.1 w hs hl hr) + +/- Each statement names adoption of a particular rule; its defined policy gives that option its meaning. -/ +noncomputable def commitmentClaim (c : Commitment) : Claim World := (commitmentPosition c).commitment + +noncomputable def commitmentFacet (c : Commitment) : Facet World := .value (commitmentPosition c) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem reasonsBelongToCommitments (c : Commitment) : + Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c] ∧ + JointAdoption (commitmentPosition c) ∧ + (commitmentPosition c).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor c .waive) := by + exact ⟨canonicalGroundsForSingleton (commitmentFacet c) (positionProcedure c), + (positionProcedure c).2.1, (criticismWithinScope c).2, oppositeProcedureRejected c⟩ + +/- This claim concerns the Grounds rule for arbitrary claim/facet packages, not a single capability duty. -/ +theorem groundsCommitmentIsProvision : commitmentClaim .grounds = (fun w => GroundsProvision w.2) := by + funext w + apply propext + exact (groundsProvisionMeaning w.2).symm + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem groundsSelfAssessment : + Grounds (fun w => GroundsProvision w.2) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet .grounds) [commitmentFacet .grounds] ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).limits actual ∧ + (commitmentPosition .grounds).relevantCriticism actual ∧ + ¬ ValueProcedure (commitmentPositionFor .grounds .waive) := by + rw [← groundsCommitmentIsProvision] + exact ⟨(reasonsBelongToCommitments .grounds).1, + (criticismWithinScope .grounds).1, (criticismWithinScope .grounds).2, + oppositeProcedureRejected .grounds⟩ + +/- This existing principle form implements the same system's choice rule on two actual proposals. +Input 0 names the identity proposal; input 1 names the cheap successor proposal. -/ +structure PhilosophyMethod where + form : Form + mode : Mode + +def currentPhilosophy (s : System) (w : World) : PhilosophyMethod := + ⟨s.principleForm, s.governance w⟩ + +noncomputable def PhilosophyMethod.review (p : PhilosophyMethod) (input : Nat) : Nat := + if input = 0 then + if choiceDecision p.mode identityImpl objectiveReason then 1 else 0 + else if choiceDecision p.mode cheapSuccessor [.method .simplicity] then 1 else 0 + +noncomputable def PhilosophyMethod.implementation (p : PhilosophyMethod) : Implementation where + name := "Current philosophy's proposal review" + conventional := true + established := true + run := p.review + cost := 1 + domain n := n = 0 ∨ n = 1 + explanation := p.review + trace n := [n, p.review n] + +def proposalRequirements : Requirements where + inputs n := n = 0 ∨ n = 1 + expected n := if n = 0 then 1 else 0 + budget := 1 + values _ := True + +theorem currentReviewCorrect : ∀ n, proposalRequirements.inputs n → + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review n = proposalRequirements.expected n := by + intro n hn + rcases hn with rfl | rfl <;> + simp [PhilosophyMethod.review, currentPhilosophy, actualSystem, actual, + proposalRequirements, decisionsApply.2.2.2.1, decisionsApply.2.2.2.2] + +/- Status alone fails for this actual principle method; its demonstrated proposal decisions give a relevant reason. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged : + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).form = actualSystem.principleForm ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).mode = actualSystem.governance actual ∧ + ¬ JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.status .standing] ∧ + JustifiedChoice proposalRequirements + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).implementation [.method .output] ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 0 = 1 ∧ + (currentPhilosophy actualSystem actual).review 1 = 0 := by + refine ⟨rfl, rfl, statusOnlyFails _ _ _, ?_, currentReviewCorrect 0 (Or.inl rfl), + currentReviewCorrect 1 (Or.inr rfl)⟩ + exact ⟨⟨currentReviewCorrect, by change 1 ≤ 1; decide⟩, + .method .output, by simp, trivial, currentReviewCorrect⟩ + +/- Applications choose their contract and requirements; the resulting claim is about this system's actual method. -/ +def applicationClaim (s : System) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) : Claim World := + fun w => contract req (s.method.realize w) + +def ApplicationDuties (s : System) (w : World) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) : Prop := + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + Grounds (applicationClaim s req contract) articulations applicable facets + +/- These are consequences of an explicitly adopted duty, not a proof that arbitrary applications fulfill it. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem applicationRetainsDuties (s : System) (w : World) (req : Requirements) + (contract : Requirements → Implementation → Prop) + (articulations : Facet World → Articulation World) + (applicable : Facet World → Prop) (facets : List (Facet World)) + (h : ApplicationDuties s w req contract articulations applicable facets) : + Reflexive s.owner (s.rules w) (s.work w) ∧ + (∀ f, applicable f → f ∈ facets) ∧ + (∀ f ∈ facets, f.claim = applicationClaim s req contract ∧ + Articulated (articulations f) ∧ FacetArticulated (articulations f) f ∧ FacetDischarged f) := + ⟨h.1, h.2.2.1, h.2.2.2⟩ + +def outputContract (req : Requirements) (i : Implementation) : Prop := + ∀ n, req.inputs n → i.run n = req.expected n + +def successorRequirements : Requirements := + { identityRequirements with expected := fun n => n + 1 } + +/- Holding the system and observation fixed while changing the actual objective changes the capability claim. -/ +def changedObjectiveFacet : Facet World := + .empirical [observation] (fun _ => True) + (applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract) (fun _ => True) + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem applicationVariation : + ApplicationDuties actualSystem actual identityRequirements outputContract + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = capabilityFacet) [capabilityFacet] ∧ + ¬ applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds (applicationClaim actualSystem successorRequirements outputContract) + canonicalArticulation (fun f => f = changedObjectiveFacet) [changedObjectiveFacet] := by + refine ⟨⟨completeOwnWork_reflexive 0, capabilityGrounds⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h 0 trivial + cases bad + · intro h + have discharged := (h.2.2 changedObjectiveFacet (by simp)).2.2.2 + have bad := discharged.2.1 actual ((observationIdentifies actual).2 rfl) trivial 0 trivial + cases bad + +/- The very system satisfies the charter while its true cost evidence fails to establish its output capability. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem charterNotGrounds : + Charter actualSystem actual ∧ + Compatible [costAllowanceRecord] actual ∧ + ¬ Grounds capability canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = unsupportedCapabilityFacet) [unsupportedCapabilityFacet] := by + exact ⟨charterChecked, (by intro r hr; cases List.mem_singleton.mp hr; rfl), unsupportedGrounds⟩ + +/- A single inhabited system/context carries the charter, its own actual claim and support, +contentful principle work, and separately reasoned governance commitments. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness +organon.preamble#p1 sha256 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097 +organon.preamble#p2 sha256 2ff45595af647eddc9fc095b3f3854f284bf3740ae7af1bacdb98773ffa44097 +organon.charter.overview#p2 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.charter.overview#p3 sha256 75d7d941d3c07ea748c4a9261d36a75fbd5664ff9c817c4034a9a36a3a12664c +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem jointWitness : + ∃ s : System, ∃ w : World, + Admissible (systemHeld s) (systemContext s) w ∧ Charter s w ∧ + OwnCapabilityDuty s w [capabilityFacet] ∧ systemCapability s w ∧ + JustifiedChoice s.requirements (s.method.realize w) objectiveReason ∧ + (∀ c : Commitment, Grounds (commitmentClaim c) canonicalArticulation + (fun f => f = commitmentFacet c) [commitmentFacet c]) ∧ + s = actualSystem ∧ w = actual := by + exact ⟨actualSystem, actual, actualAdmissible, charterChecked, + ownCapabilityGrounded.1, capabilityActual, identityJustified, + fun c => (reasonsBelongToCommitments c).1, rfl, rfl⟩ + +end CoreReader.Integration diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c7c98b0 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean @@ -0,0 +1,236 @@ +namespace CoreReader.Logic + +/- A claim denotes the worlds in which its content holds. -/ +abbrev Claim (W : Type) := W → Prop +/- A theory is a collection of simultaneously held claims. -/ +abbrev Theory (W : Type) := Claim W → Prop +/- A model satisfies every member of the whole theory. -/ +def Models {W : Type} (t : Theory W) (w : W) : Prop := ∀ p, t p → p w +/- Semantic entailment quantifies over all models. -/ +def Entails {W : Type} (t : Theory W) (p : Claim W) : Prop := ∀ w, Models t w → p w +/- Satisfiability requires an actual witness. -/ +def Satisfiable {W : Type} (t : Theory W) : Prop := ∃ w, Models t w +/- Assumptions, meanings and scope are distinct components; questions remain explicit. -/ +structure Context (W Q : Type) where + assumptions : Theory W + meaning : Q → Claim W + scope : Claim W +/- Admissible worlds satisfy held claims, assumptions and scope jointly. -/ +def Admissible {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (w : W) : Prop := + Models t w ∧ Models c.assumptions w ∧ c.scope w +/- A negative judgment denies the very same question under the same meaning. -/ +def Consequence {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (q : Q) (positive : Bool) : Prop := + ∀ w, Admissible t c w → if positive then c.meaning q w else ¬ c.meaning q w +/- The consistency obligation prohibits both consequences at one comparison basis. -/ +def Consistent {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) : Prop := + ∀ q, ¬ (Consequence t c q true ∧ Consequence t c q false) +/- An inhabited joint interpretation prevents opposite semantic consequences. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency +organon.charter.consistency#p1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem consequenceConsistency {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) + (inhabited : ∃ w, Admissible t c w) : Consistent t c := by + intro q h + obtain ⟨w, hw⟩ := inhabited + exact (h.2 w hw) (h.1 w hw) +/- Empty and singleton theories provide concrete semantic contexts. -/ +def emptyTheory {W : Type} : Theory W := fun _ => False +def singleton {W : Type} (p : Claim W) : Theory W := fun q => q = p +def union {W : Type} (a b : Theory W) : Theory W := fun p => a p ∨ b p +theorem modelsSingleton {W : Type} (p : Claim W) (w : W) : Models (singleton p) w ↔ p w := by + constructor + · intro h; exact h p rfl + · intro h q hq; cases hq; exact h +theorem modelsUnion {W : Type} (a b : Theory W) (w : W) : + Models (union a b) w ↔ Models a w ∧ Models b w := by + constructor + · intro h; exact ⟨fun p hp => h p (Or.inl hp), fun p hp => h p (Or.inr hp)⟩ + · rintro ⟨ha,hb⟩ p (hp|hp); exact ha p hp; exact hb p hp +/- The paired world records independent truth values for two questions. -/ +def premiseP : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.1 = true +def premiseRule : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.1 = true → w.2 = true +def premiseNotQ : Claim (Bool × Bool) := fun w => w.2 ≠ true +def jointTheory : Theory (Bool × Bool) := + union (singleton premiseP) (union (singleton premiseRule) (singleton premiseNotQ)) +/- Each premise has a model, but their joint implication makes the union unsatisfiable. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict +organon.charter.consistency#p1 sha256 c6960c590c096d33250599cf418e3c6a1dc26bfc7d7800c82b8efde656950f42 +-/ +theorem jointConflict : + Satisfiable (singleton premiseP) ∧ Satisfiable (singleton premiseRule) ∧ + Satisfiable (singleton premiseNotQ) ∧ ¬ Satisfiable jointTheory := by + refine ⟨⟨(true,true), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨(false,false), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by intro h; cases h)⟩, + ⟨(false,false), (modelsSingleton _ _).2 (by intro h; cases h)⟩, ?_⟩ + rintro ⟨w, hw⟩ + have hp := hw premiseP (Or.inl rfl) + have hr := hw premiseRule (Or.inr (Or.inl rfl)) + have hn := hw premiseNotQ (Or.inr (Or.inr rfl)) + exact hn (hr hp) +/- A retraction replaces the old singleton, rather than retaining both at the same time. -/ +def revisionSlice (time : Nat) : Theory Bool := + singleton (fun w => w = (time == 0)) +/- The initial and revised slices have models; keeping both would create a conflict. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem revisionCanReverse : + Satisfiable (revisionSlice 0) ∧ Satisfiable (revisionSlice 1) ∧ + ¬ Satisfiable (union (revisionSlice 0) (revisionSlice 1)) := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, + ⟨false, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + rintro ⟨w, hw⟩ + have hs := (modelsUnion _ _ _).1 hw + have hp := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hs.1 + have hn := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 hs.2 + have bad : true = false := hp.symm.trans hn + cases bad +/- This basic question asks whether the represented switch is on. -/ +def onQuestion : Unit → Claim Bool := fun _ w => w = true +def assumptionContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨singleton (fun w => w = b), onQuestion, fun _ => True⟩ +def meaningContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨singleton (fun w => w = true), (fun _ w => w = b), fun _ => True⟩ +def scopeContext (b : Bool) : Context Bool Unit := + ⟨emptyTheory, onQuestion, fun w => w = b⟩ +/- Distinct assumptions, meanings and scopes each admit opposite judgments without same-context conflict. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem contextDifferences : + (Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (assumptionContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (meaningContext false) () false) ∧ + (Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext true) () true ∧ + Consequence emptyTheory (scopeContext false) () false) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (assumptionContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (meaningContext b) w) ∧ + (∀ b, ∃ w, Admissible emptyTheory (scopeContext b) w) := by + have empty : ∀ w : Bool, Models emptyTheory w := by intro w p hp; cases hp + refine ⟨⟨?_, ?_⟩, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ⟨?_, ?_⟩, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro w h; change w = true; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 h.2.1 + · intro w h hp; have hn := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h.2.1; cases hp.symm.trans hn + · intro w h; change w = true; exact (modelsSingleton (fun x : Bool => x = true) w).1 h.2.1 + · intro w h hn; have hp := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h.2.1; cases hp.symm.trans hn + · intro w h; exact h.2.2 + · intro w h hp; cases hp.symm.trans h.2.2 + · intro b; exact ⟨b, empty b, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial⟩ + · intro b; exact ⟨true, empty true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl, trivial⟩ + · intro b; exact ⟨b, empty b, empty b, rfl⟩ +/- Snapshots preserve identifiable adopted-form revisions even when semantic content agrees. -/ +structure Snapshot (W Q : Type) where + held : Theory W + context : Context W Q + revisionIdentity : Nat +/- Semantic equivalence compares represented content, not its list ordering. -/ +def SameContent {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) : Prop := + (∀ p, a.held p ↔ b.held p) ∧ + (∀ p, a.context.assumptions p ↔ b.context.assumptions p) ∧ + (∀ q w, a.context.meaning q w ↔ b.context.meaning q w) ∧ + (∀ w, a.context.scope w ↔ b.context.scope w) +/- The reporting norm covers both semantic change and independently identified revisions. -/ +def TruthfulReport {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) : Prop := + (¬ SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) → reported = true +/- A real represented change and compliance entail an acknowledged change. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem semanticChangeMustBeReported {W Q : Type} (a b : Snapshot W Q) (reported : Bool) + (changed : ¬ SameContent a b ∨ a.revisionIdentity ≠ b.revisionIdentity) + (h : TruthfulReport a b reported) : reported = true := h changed +/- Reordering a two-claim presentation preserves the held theory extension. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem representationOrderIrrelevant {W : Type} (p q : Claim W) : + ∀ r, union (singleton p) (singleton q) r ↔ union (singleton q) (singleton p) r := by + intro r; exact or_comm +def contextSnapshot (c : Context Bool Unit) (revision : Nat := 0) : Snapshot Bool Unit := + ⟨emptyTheory, c, revision⟩ +/- Hiding each kind of contextual change violates the reporting interface; reporting alone supplies no truth guarantee. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2 sha256 81c09e38a3349499f95401d1c08f6069666c13547a43bc4e4395330743055faa +-/ +theorem hiddenContextChangeRejected : + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (meaningContext true)) (contextSnapshot (meaningContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true)) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext false)) false ∧ + ¬ TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 0) (contextSnapshot (scopeContext true) 1) false ∧ + (TruthfulReport (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext true)) (contextSnapshot (assumptionContext false)) true ∧ + ¬ Models (assumptionContext false).assumptions true) := by + have neq : (fun w : Bool => w = true) ≠ (fun w : Bool => w = false) := by + intro h; have k := congrFun h true; have z : true = false := k.mp rfl; cases z + refine ⟨?_, ?_, ?_, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; exact neq ((s.2.1 _).mp rfl))) + cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; have z := (s.2.2.1 () true).mp rfl; cases z)) + cases bad + · intro h + have bad := h (Or.inl (by intro s; have z := (s.2.2.2 true).mp rfl; cases z)) + cases bad + · intro h; have bad := h (Or.inr (by decide)); cases bad + · refine ⟨fun _ => rfl, ?_⟩ + intro h; have z := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h; cases z +/- Two nonidentical resource objectives can share a feasible allocation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +-/ +theorem tensionWithoutContradiction : + (∃ budget : Nat, 4 ≤ budget ∧ budget ≤ 6) ∧ + ¬ ((fun n : Nat => 4 ≤ n) = (fun n : Nat => n ≤ 6)) := by + refine ⟨⟨5, by decide, by decide⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h; have k := congrFun h 0; have bad : 4 ≤ 0 := k.mpr (by decide); cases bad +/- Conflicting conclusions cannot be retained under the same consistency obligation. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +-/ +theorem conflictRequiresChange {W Q : Type} (t : Theory W) (c : Context W Q) (q : Q) + (positive : Consequence t c q true) (negative : Consequence t c q false) : + ¬ Consistent t c := fun h => h q ⟨positive,negative⟩ +/- A satisfiable theory can have a false assumption at a specified actual world. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem consistentFalse : Satisfiable (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) ∧ + ¬ Models (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true)) false := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩, ?_⟩ + intro h; have bad := (modelsSingleton _ _).1 h; cases bad +/- The explicitly asked on/off question is undecided by the empty but inhabited theory. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete +organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1 sha256 4fa1c29bf95ad6ef04c6d27671a832c0af8ba31b9c0d8018a8d09c4f33c38e75 +organon.relationships.roles#p1 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p2 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +organon.relationships.roles#p3 sha256 24b533c77fe93d0570da65ee361893f2c445842f48ee6f315f99f8abc06a0e5e +-/ +theorem consistentIncomplete : Satisfiable (emptyTheory : Theory Bool) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w ≠ true) := by + have empty : ∀ w : Bool, Models emptyTheory w := by intro w p hp; cases hp + refine ⟨⟨true, empty true⟩, ?_, ?_⟩ + · intro h; have bad := h false (empty false); cases bad + · intro h; exact h true (empty true) rfl +/- A claim can share a model with a theory without following in every model. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment +organon.grounds.assessment#p1 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p2 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +organon.grounds.assessment#p3 sha256 2e7cbca320eec1f25a6e82391c6d44d29bfafd4a27f2fe8241db0453381d0fe2 +-/ +theorem compatibilityNotEntailment : + Satisfiable (union emptyTheory (singleton (fun w : Bool => w = true))) ∧ + ¬ Entails emptyTheory (fun w : Bool => w = true) := by + refine ⟨⟨true, (modelsUnion _ _ _).2 ⟨?_, (modelsSingleton _ _).2 rfl⟩⟩, + consistentIncomplete.2.1⟩ + intro p hp; cases hp + +end CoreReader.Logic diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.olean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Logic.olean new file mode 100644 index 0000000000000000000000000000000000000000..f4b9cecb0f6a48af98b7137156a3ecceaeb38875 GIT binary patch literal 210448 zcma%Ed0~x-o5wDyhM!-8xm>I zH>~&CYxU~uo_&SXZyHj+@z4fg!9!jfI-+54qah<2HX0JvXjqdWBN{YpT7P)Rh(<%h z!W!#z9mn*orqg9L>g1+Eqh6=GZ-Q!4BR+SEjEKd5byl50ukpGsC-fwZ2-uo&u1ZDG z7^rDVK)X=Nt6+ORp#ATz0ZgPRkWZ%`4cGYY7X=?_5qxeJ6&=AiXf$XDd3`+5x-6V@&& zGBzyI6F#?HanO?ls(VziZ_U}8Q>f1ZeWWGud013rOhk-O*Kx?`m@s#%u#ft3pf5dT z!O8H&(@s#I8Sjnv(#-;K%YfeG5m!wEKkwwA zUdD;EIP{LurcXrVNY&i}`m8?E-|WF(RSw)ysRH#e{-o3!8KtQjF)k(|Dzf)PSN=HA zZx{5nSr*skq;pRd>SKP8GEZF5VPhg6;LDjf9ZpLJ;#kMT%QyA+D^E&cwA_g0n}GY{71V; zOUjSBAu%!I#<*g&@D&&mH>%p13cZGR^9E$t)7IV zOMR?Qq|_UuCFAI@*r-VKCx~iaD)hay@7LMuiZ|#^eVlKkte0a(F1sW z)619ru;M`KVg8Xa4`U)Gg>@e>IL75QpM#*s2HJk%2MddoDDIxVB5sTmDeDX7o!dCo zt|aK`V444&&!8uE+QoTB%K0`XYIxY_m|g{#l^15Hp&tN|pw?p&WY@2USpej$C)^Ntta)Lj;G=%XvY{`4Js9K0*|&c0(e2hK&!4 z#x2CHSk)V3mi~{NFd@6XBkE7;E$img=}61qvo`N=U+NS&ENYBP%WY4gQ1!+`Z_vP! z=d!B2@Tw3Ocp~zhbu(k*FP{}FqPs3|;SckPl=thd?z|9OQV;889{R}%$*oaq?T0G_ zF7)ueMap>;5&5=YabLn7=0T{xj6+Jeo$M9{WWU#$w?F}&(jk#EDCoWX%FXnF7!l><>$f&EzAIP+PPiJuWtU#JJHt!(36(?z>FE{?gE2_Xe%) zcOv(EMSZL%q^xJ*VWWo&9&xGhHW!z1ux!6+xL^EAZ-I+(<9dvg`Of=9r{P+vXsILk zd8vBs)SEf#`;J!{Y!y60FY}x91qjE4jnNW2VwhalcO4fK+g97R3E#sC*zKtY&|h-s zE00=cw%AYotY4%YN7jRg$QVS^D-I=O9OfVI@yK_7NI3N|k4PC;ZC``zm3mlL9MIFF zb*s82|90+Grtq8jPs%(MD~(RWAqQ zivBq+q#Pev7u~~Hz>m<9GHw%= z#I3pdZn@v7hxtaz`1I0>ZOn*>Aw!?BPfCEkdqD?%?G2uMCiDrrnOA1yL&zYXhJiDG zd;GupbKk$8Q?K&SU)=W{Hk!9@zs~+xhndH5J|l1Z)$Co*I*I;}a@^Yt*S4uK5vqFy z;uT&>#w)Aem@`wq4DhTM=pXYv?~M|BTVJ03p0_>m*w_D3cIW*T8x}+mr#$Z)Q|_&~ z=6E#0Q^#m0DecuV3F}g!NnUCm1(uff?(TB5%p3pKaWgzGPjLTt^Qrk3PCXa)g;o0V z#fySL=wY2FWxZm3?WG-dgt@g9oIk11H^|YW#{FaWlcW0+G)tpgNr6*g=y)b3sFK z-jN8J0~(6`5$A0-KF49-n+|Hhe$WY;3TnoF$O)PTngwdbx-J|v6EqO(=Wx&j&@9j( ztVeC2T)!pZa~`Mz>%BP8bkJ!ERG!N8<`I`uu4a)m%F!C`TG!rx!`4tB$a!TZ> zd!ecQpHypeU+x7h{x9;B?Rn*8o_;w0i+{ra6?)4F-4{X?FiCk=Y;*@sQ+T3VMBV&@X!6;<*I%J^1lX866hELM{aS z4$!vg?ROX;r^!6iuc7XqGh#spPs37U24^7>V5puAZMv4;}Q(Iy3+MmeIT#$XJb5E zkh6jRU{P~-qm`VJ3jImocYwx$Kl*Y&U6aL~6CNSKZ}s9&0e{EM|9&lMGyM=kR-KQI z^_A^e;1{^o_RMphHj$ofhNdTfz64d0aj1Xp^rw@~Gl5X>_30N*6(T>lPOaDdej{C|L_~gOL0=x| zqj8fj>VXUUj8H<#`O#^_2p}S!`Edw-LB^qUl=fD=K|;a2s^nh z*GIuEm8CzNzwOV?S!Pu5ILHTsFCg>d-6jR6e$KD-eSRlY{Vp&4Vb|mTQ1#n^CxVV! zSR>CD`rY#o<7R;!so)EFZR;C;p^RXDyj-!5wJlys6$GxlsE8t4lw(e?EVoYF`N2 zXhbB0o3}a=;hU^5ZT=!6)*L`xxe3qvft&sYS?#yjXDjo7WupP_0`I z;2i%klY5+2>sB0a)}@;*Yc5smLK1MsZ}imQ|J1s`@l6BY*p6K`sC9|@otWqI7M2N9 z_2+r%KYFCzU#k8r;DIkmKmUq5F-@&I93T1@0=}#3x-=-P?gX+w@ZFnze{n#5yiFF2 zUjp!1d#_IeYsk3NeJ8YDNlU@?rqJ)bKDB{=jTjwU6HGRlygm zGwRH^pT|L83TPUrs>h=3-!joIlj zG%xw}gRd?luSV~4-AZbJu;*c_w8P^^9`t=wBP`GV?!F6xU5rC0_8HVI+J$}ATGH=O z&?^g0FBF)#gntgS)4#2j%FU=l;Bmk?zvo2PO)_YSATEvXnd1-}JuXagx%<&OV0Rky zmHT)93u*pi;{}g9j%a7!&daUUb+{=BxGqTgGd*qIIv>~}@|g3Septb`x@gK??hzDw zOj)oe6np_KzIbc`gYY{ExC?kx%+0TS6`XZB5%}a)n?C1WM#P1El5%{tN0l@~`0W|j zOz7EJ^k|bx>9em2CJ~oBv@oOQ#{ zWLAN?kqDf5)#qrrJ?vBX$?;^}$X#B!mEUvbYbNwY;vacC8;{0@~^8 z?=@|2QGx0=?U?ua!Bmcwz*8Wf0eW`*$#DAXmiMZ2y+dc5<2^y(=DG#_th#P~Abk;d z4)g|ruR>Op%}Sh%JV&SftN!rcs@fk8IgaZ;Eh=9iuh5?WoOLr|;;B(;-AwVaud(l} zq0CVsZv&nI8vObF4*#EViXP#)t?M*Bp8Ph~lkw>K%73r7e0Ni>@I}Lo!DwgxzB#Y8 zP4&|boPNf=b0O4I63~OKI%B+!2U$=ZSM5RL+_P;n$&nY zpy!)*qci-&b6*im!d|WeSf3wue{Fyok7UR(UM)Jk>chT-9sEBjWyiQYW{7?~^Di6v z7M{xry0yB_X4qjg2TMOSo$hOWY-`UxTi6){T!%X9XI|exonJQK>Cm6KYIOr;ewdiQ z^mFIQlMmJW4TpRJXovFI-I%|k{}i;d?yU-|xUneep74+BF+T5okejxp!N1Ghj~&E1 zj(#z3>30tFn(Isd_jdX*5+M+AGg;BjeE#;!ztX8o;Gw|j*YwCEJvas$-!sQ&a436m z=YgL4k$C89P+~>fdG9=aBDjPe#)6cw9jx6*!=fXH0k?mshzxNUcJxQRaRu=u^j|#=z z=`QrJMv`(q3O%APaS40VA)gKUxLDTr=PoZO2i#zOP5QaoEuquhPL5CR+#!6i_$d0} zn38I3?kj)QDf?l&4f-ZusU5Rm+MA68v#`U3c8>E~`+r_PZThUW#1nxt?)Cnt5_F+R zkxz-I0%zQh>@W;}w@!@vUL)e337l~c9Mdv(#=DO_`g4IZo)_Z$+f-S!ZYcFz8p=2@ zPJg8TV;J1PX8~|SFmSg*t?}lbovDcxm$w0KV!h%#z5U9XR@_f$_Id8JJU5EyckHr{ zRY=P?bNonI*KEqhO~jFLPK7<~wyoRO`9RWcp+}wXA!CLPA0jRC*yV{=CiG8wW$s(;rhTwM zaA;-JgNx5v{B-8VG7dqYXxE3}vu2Cu5_YkclX5=h|LUmV{0N7h%ac;SY_KJXb;FqG zrGMF?RetP9i(e5t@Kn%yQCS0Mi?(0&3&H&-6@F%dZ(*5(OU$9vB&o`uhE4+CA%m&hcLtQ}9gSoPT4#TX(m3KCWkcSbx5pm0ROPlV#rv8?^rQmJsO=>(7Uw z)AL?iA6kZZFmTqNvZmPSNrPis12@=#v;O=ur_&J4Pnnmb zoZDfeJzs-##~~4UU}-Aj@mh4_20@>;dKLW`L(tATa?$7257CX=j$p5O9KEslM<%P} z5O%Uo(9Y5^1N>;Gz~i7l3AEwb-%S*KW-IuU46gd4je)#ltgMz1_Unlr%9}ODnXO#@< z{EG+9`MNUX>*-U+8cmRLF`r1vM`ir=KhSc1d935^=BrXPj0oxb+Ej3jGe8d-3~>x6Qv^H}f1IbkN|WiF@CQa}5{kB=7S( zDd(eeVxOmLCF5WP6}a|X!4RT+)@*#{`goiWz$NAZ{RxMB&R6&T9`Q;)_dZnElZbZm z2~nY+ivUutGsZ;4MvM=W9jN*3^xZ zu0e`^lOE8ae#b zA4gjq5M1tf_)33i&&zLJji&|;H(A?AoZlnRmmYOX@01(@4+Tzpf4<+PoqRQSf-+T<;G^Pg!DA@MPf3w~>9%HZv(W_aW)vTXg5ueZIg&ymV-1oU-wG+4$`F ze4eYrCHU=#XC|nwt@MBR9owkF*3Y@f*I@7mgFor~*q+|&XAv*XFWSATb~BScR2m@g zM94ECR$FF18H=@-35+KicaQW=1FASklhmcPJ&T(Iwv#pm8aLpcH z<~i-i0Dn;Pxd%C)q&9gUWu800mjl}RVa?wB9)!xzJP!n4UTtK2?tU<@nWyvWTO(Ot1Rnglj05d> z<52DD2Gj{*hkGNd^+n3ix}stt@>eR-DAgVp^ajk_GjB@S@~s4ih8y|&4o$cF%IuZ@ zLos1bI^=l&`RZiE-@IQ6JR3OYU+VgttDK(#*V&{$^f&jnOY79{FIs`q-$wf)3Ve?! z6gcN)!*f=D&L5%Q37qTr*5~JUb$pg}@6?zwI#<5k zsnDAVdg{YHUG)l{!+x#Ozr9`0=nV>P?kw9Gm)>o=kMmLRAmEJ4@dn>~Y*cW5kH7}L zkKes|)C64IFESDLMA#7yzSgtmZ1Y2W>8IdNM&8ClE&=@C{XFS=vz?rh3jU|Q{|Ek% z_`@Ijhd#}3fqpw^4)|9N3M^MhefF%=Gf+1I-;nY0AD*6C)cUl3@A_;5|DC<@KH@x& z<0~YE{oeIC4*Vm=^}H>{T;&(_nZFBTdkXl4K9PrIKKyy3BHCcP3!y=obsH1yH|bHRh7?$oTaPu|AcwW zP_rT*jCRidhn1T?^jB~@aL)he@yTx#QSdyBlM8&c^!+Xu1+L|RXMfLmlnB07vjVCI zU_R+^34ZT+l?wjfcKP-z<|L=2g5P^yWrP3mq46z?KRvH}z2}vsn~cka7Uk!a2z^?= z_q+-P|9dr^11!N$^K<{pdF2BCH%FcCVE=OT6b*Cit7Ks=q{> zmvH`wp2WJwdtQllG2gN{zq(8RgFyu@&O>aozFquJJ4f%PDbk?!~=WC zIOz0}9$NJ8je2+6?j#-poXoM-y@6_c~dp zPF>5a%jb~pI)HTm$0-l`QeW2@jaFer{w4UcXb)nP95ho^wX{E$eH7d?OG*x zG~Aetc1@@ITDt4be*9PDzi$$7#zEIh`c>bzR8Pu~U-%UVek=G|ezoLZvqf?UectoQ z4!#$^IMA1S0_xMm49tDeChCv({1WZrd*61>3+PJ*O$AkL72o^LK)aCFuxHL2yI{bj z#?#ze#v%FYgsT4*U3^2Z2tBL`q_n?ZEoyPc-BY*h&~tiW=V3Xe7Q4spd3t(0Lr)U) ztTr!yvDnr_|NJj|VxOTW8+zh`m+vYcS=~iR$;eD1>zPG;gYsi7{wMgo?~7^R-{2Y* z>sN?9-uJ~E@Q+-XSIk_9J;AWw6PLcy@3RrrR{CrF>LurVfv8CCV+(kg-H0Oz{%)z3$q zF(^3i*Ob3j{exM0XTE$;Kj|;!6aQ=Wg#ox0e_xK54SbB#hqc}wMTJIKSgMKDOueqWXAgfyfu0-%&mf z{na?$^S;4FOC{Cf=eeIvPA~SQXpOUG9(vEGZjkuDhU;w(86V!y-s$=1#3S8{^3@yU@D0*j1O?Jzjr?f(Yg!XII65JQTvZ}sr{xx{`7(Q zv3dnhM0*CP^+?cMW4c@1EuVvSt_Q5SmL?|PTCAS=-X^?{(-T{vQH-}HWP86gOl-DTvU= zc&CDI+kfY~_<&E~*=T3HlgFOBVFWJhbbql#(>G-4g{HbxsaUns`lj?R{@kkv^uSd+ zIUXV4d#B%Lv4&(A2qN_9fIC31uRqh+q}Z8&c8<^M+e-HJ1un*iYX?#@bi3ckmigwpv=2+1>np_6xOw6mv1+LyTPk(q1Et@L+s}rzOMMhP1UUUpeJf$4QNbO+ z=}&I6z*G}(5%;RHD_s#?NiF4NHi@|A!QME?CxQMm)mF?m7eXL{-+}Q>fm|y1C$`wJ z&@cOG{yfwJGxGxc^GE&oyBYDOl+d37e#;;k59aOd1&{9eKh5uX4#9dF3b~k9dUP$4 zPR){P`hEEvA`tz!z&~Y2ql!gSpXSfy`84WvGWhQ-?6@)@xgft7$29O|f^X6MUOS4V z~SbHtqDNd@&4X0H|e*D9Kiuvr-NqdQr*u?fSa<=&V5~p3Ddezm&mg` zFMRi+rh^SaSi1zy`&8f%>2HZqi>rEKpsjED{w?YZ0iTf9+Mc;j>gL`72`+a(9{=JX z|HZwI9mmhVJ`lJu8SPxBRHz!waOWS1y}y1`R(U@9-9e%%lxAM@jQqUf}iz_=drrs(yue!r&Tdp$tkJe_pWEb z;IG)%kSF4=`XKnd>zNb$ReyMAwipMMU+g2jpMNHTUs#~!g^}-7qg-+`%SLIP8#iTx zpU*3fPiWpkeJ-X8lm2m?GxW{072N-byt4x5zAx?PANH%y#X^B|pEl#pvD)f$F(+{5 z^@;Hl+w-}YX7e-WXGH$%(1o9#I*|;0B@9dMwyd1~m~qHJJL|-$UF|&Yof3ZJ0B3#~ zr<6R*m66?phIlvZwl5wy^Xtf%h-dzRFY)WnF=m&pz$N%uhdJMz;J@r@ zUCiHEfL*Jv`Om9Z9}~g<;-c7oMeI-Wd)LQw@Za0Kt6tI2r}@3>V=nkB+^D-a0OL$4 zVUKrxv_{DITub+DP|QkBNd>=meYAtW{Ekn~h~H%}Z-s>5_pXoe;IDdn{8DlDq4I0u z2Hw|&ytq$!*GthZ?o;WggQ?J$4VnvDP_JHZejD>blNWWE?-wPX_j-qRkn;XHBLB78 znjUSviFH>v^sldTquISxkKI2O*KlJZ+PThXQRl?J!Uu7Q`I-ux`7p{=ydiB8c%~Pg zF=_e^b)At5ob|X^(;M~Gbq4F8Wt8;)=D!clsOyYiw6hKl{kH03t}{gcT*q)e&MuK{ z_OZInciT_>F6b$K>D_z0uL}7@Fa4VWCigT!Uds>9e6xcu74(bF>o@pn387vhpE%#R z?#TrI`5(%q`>D*@|3&_IkF#JA`C~)ebfaZl_}-adeC8MkezDH6pZ%XY_f8ZFYKLqsV@Jr>@=UWauFZ9%9(j+qw9BYVK)h{`=X0z$d}h1_zsRFR zw2RMTT>1SJ`c-1ePrp+};F;j(^W~ztflrkAZ{+)eDN|+CvK*mXTteOwCHI$vheH6QoGdef*k8d_s|s~s(w50M9`b@!+vK?)%c#d zuh!l_UEq5I{9ZsN^z{4YpZ(5&v+gM`?94+u`=0p4)&lQ0O9dY2lJS_*|L|KTI3nT@ zf_C~*%RcZV_fZ1pdwd+=Ti0dyV%8fs4*mQdPTs{vPiTw48HXgu*ZQ;FPmF`W)6gCW zy4P=hylP(-+NuBT)Eli-`{ID-flmE)Z-MvT(Eh-&(*M=Rs+MM+YyBI&pVOLa{gk1O zvjcLBPwg#Ezry^B1K*wBc73J#mxOlux3g>a5Y@jlFa0$yF6piMNBgtDH)PFlI%ALc;y9AW7YWceb}_Q`LVK-)%a&Yj`5%3Xi|)C)%)TVZ-~RgQ7S+BqFZ(`f z`-@4nFAF&J-=YI3c1u@;!_&XrS zIy&H;h=Hnq+?Nyo{PlhbDxL&+*74>Q106~oH>Cj&MjdH=;qC>c4x3zP=X&CosqH4| ztgmwuUS#9BV=!~?#H1Y2lyJ* zKXHod1x=sl{o0I20{9{u-hZ3pqUvLQrGPJf))&i_@iB3J)Bmm=T6EFF{sR6(e$1iV z$p!o$U(o*>vpY3=uK(cgHeup{=lT!6O<#=o@VWkjFDW+l&~yCObULPiuFofd3N;`tRFg#E;MQAN<#+T(9z6|H1dF&(|xS>p%GJd_8||Vg6^q z?iBD%8~*d6B1jPT_+nhMfEPdI_g_&34`KcTKmSvzZ-9cQp)Ll-$v9j-wAxin!9!5L zLxA5*NV~#k^6qmxla%9}c7RW)(Au8)z6kf<)5`D1bMBP{`H?-B4%;{7oe04q{B*o5 z`(YjE5SQFYtrOXh<2+uqt?V)G_r$#8{)qEVH&N;fT5K%FdJA*h{qeZ~`Ac^H>n42^ zez69T(w1-+wYcr}_~k->D+V;^J8siG_iyioU-XA|rylD)&Vc=$hU@u$0>1C)OwZc& z-;8keMqG?p(97p0|4n*v2`$j%4VkY=Kf{`TK1a0YjhynQC+;jV3b?@mJPg4pR=s5BFV>!LKfBQS_q;!o_I35yB}Cnq z>VFoV2Q>QXpK$eDE(!Y6Ko3sbUf?||S!n0{Uv;bKBc4YJ{dvF{-%oZ|VIc;3cy zxtB6;?9tn$eIjr8JM6&8GEO0&?PpwZ_=ZY8{wwYmap*6#vE+Ave?*&vtA4@cl+ z#xDVUUB3xyZw8;h)6h=)yNr6vz~5VHxaYkNjPHi!wjbGxkY|1|KEXex-7#2|{-Hl` zinO=X_Fk=h6g&j&?Egv2?_FyB%%XkZtCDhLDt}iY;*kXZ(m>9{j-fqtHL0-+NwXfPb0u*AA>>o= zb>UWiy~~$(U_bF?>A-X9dM_OEdBAHF```}iy6B(lkwmOpmhY+9gY`$?DUfHpcYj>t zN1kUqukJ()rdHsmzd+$Qt1^vWx9xNZl8Yyr)@I=sJFGjs#f(rsq$9X&J@2I}MsVFgS z`!XTNb>otKJ1eOAbEzM3{^`dF1=fw0ccfoj_aCUWVU_A%FmTSBrcs9`Rt{gwU`kf-#|`@NdF>C!&-AGq)(Uv)gPq1Ot& zwvk6}7J+^(@1A)cGdgTUf%6zU>X#FG0v=uN<=7dtNT*#|9E=HQXD)Y7-*!P@;u3MP zR*`mcT;GdZw2!<3&wxDhzFW@QHPyV&0nYjoSKKs+YZM{RaW>D8{n+me^E_J+co5nd zr?TVH3cSxK1^R8^Yj*an$7&oyUMy&Ty++#`srDy8j`o-9a^@}7{uJP}KfOYe4^;az zyzKkEXYW4h{U{uG4(R4#JAYxGYIZzxJsKS`GModc#liEQ;-Hz*pHe@pPXF)aoAWVF zMmyT++sYO7-QRKLIC4G8IKI^V#TsfpyC9zknp{3@p6UnpeKz>fpv00HYMe76M?d>E zX_7%d#WqeR13Pd_SD&-I zp9?$_b;bp}&D_1U1FRxC^4yy1stnwp62bS%xw8p;&zasO+0Se3^6qin?DhxunGEnn+|r#@*ULF*4+QN~ZAPxLUiQ3ynfCo$ zHLROzU(oxqU-rN9VV7ThmG!t8xDB+%?Tw#ty({cv{bgR2L2b zj&A?G`ZwL2b3@&)u>NL%uh`CsGgSLhP%qg3*>;0ksr{Q13i>y6)yt37{ZbC}27#~D zjMbCW__MAtKI_tMj#Tr>g}M!UFr^$F0+{dUES%-nHlD>8_u0Ox*tL`t8L*ET)idm;=O zz)PT0SG9V@TkWW`6!M<^cuC;3PB#pB`!M$u>f4PjsbBcXnnB7K#7rDB24)oS(*=F!7AH3EI;evCUCElA#w4`U&sa;M z`?nQBhwvi}IQ^V?HyR~q{&csR!id~J@*D(9!*%tzLf;m&LRYCTD!eV`}n zgv~Q6@>ytSzUus6cliU?_DP=en>_IGy_35-Sf&*LAID4Ox54hf4`qDD4G;UEsFR$M zihYj_4*nGIy)x;&@Z#VTcoy23 zr}O6K+Da%m^PJ=J@Y3<~J_;TASuPo(KQ4!1r@!{c%e^?s-ow>v5$4 zgZ1yOX;oLJU0VF~fgef#S&yx4evI88_g(()zk#zJzq@2@|8_?*et^8e0lYMd%hh>z z7bj01$@5VYdynt`E?|%M_*Nc8t}kG+5i0>gOW^&{t&ct{A^7Y_4HM6&Tj|!z6(Cv*-yda(9UzD zb5FVq;Co%%{sZUxJ!_vkkmC<|bv~wnkMp;Di{dScfKQBtxP(5wH#Q6Wo1WDAx~O6g z-=E5SA6PwRpt?Q^nlIzPcpkofHj=en=(ho9K6cyDshi1?-@h4nIH-M+^CQ*)Q7_^U zZ@v#S0er@ny80J3|MQU7Dd78RdHkZ1q51t~p`GvD?fCfP1*H@`u%+~e_v;s`--%NF z30xp?&Y$yNKRN2B$mc1?`+I_J!aPfZAJnnO_-nOA$Ilv#0)^tpn;DX<06mj6W za4O{E!2eU!i{;B&bp7yW`lp~;30pNCnKmBR}1u7 z79w8V7vIu;cH_R>mGYn589v8P=|3IvanL{J`w{!i3eNp(9OT<~Yy7=B&bmcXFY~tP4--$TdCUDQ z<$vgD>88$$P{?yX`{kBR^;G>%;H(qb+fDOKR%xJ!56?^E!FT(!hzIIb~(Yf{-^ZL zg`F401FsR#Dpox&(m_5M_?V@ZM}?giS(yjmoBraA-~T`7McLr*>FC|0u=Ap9%rDCl z8K)_gEjJ1~FABu`+dcSFZ8blfkYjxQespg_Ve^af4c{Dkt-$z0p7U#Bk0}*Y{prA& ze;N8|=hgg+!~Ds@xyip5JIAQ|W}eUMlB9o^+W3rD_sv$c^LHI>lJ0L*_suDFr5yDy zf3*LAx^EAKyc4wN?Y3LgeKqGF{nyVvSm?QQGUV^QH?(O1|IyC=+b!#mTG+WrHu#pl zTVs}LALk$Y@3g49U5&r>lY;*Jw_tijqjujCm#AMl;Gv*{c2x;b@sCGbbW5e5b-uXX zTRGS8oGZ-6I`-H4AC-JGWq2F-?>SeP3;f#WnSF})-4en01Y&>1eZrzKk;9BGfy(%C z9~qDS^Ypu4Fe!L4+PThsJFsRcUj^qnGaYO!U_3! z(627F`bgbJa6iENj}`f!4F3KDH_a$)AHn@cHtvt<;Lm%fcjoi<5%J*91HZlMjXD3H zeMHdbGCm7G_+VdQ`-o8Jb%5{9x5f@s_YuihXCwf3tT9z6Y#$LAEBh%k!PQCKM`S=Q zZ-T@deel7(067f`>_Z$e5-(D(q4)@AH)Z^=3e@dY|PwI{|uHZ@4vC)t`cP&hz(fU%6?r=Ff9JU&sJoeDc5A zkLmJp-sjo>ceP(%p!RS6Li$hrlfK>`t**0kpf?D7i8q_}RM*M8&$It4D-Zms_8$&8 z%C}#!qK+!hb#?;y8aI71PhDrHpxqPSrN$-dI@<<31GN5_7JqY{t?rY<;YSYmdiQ*# zUr~#U6aOu2pKM+s<8%ABK3$nt>I(`|D=Q?@ES3d-)`I7^jxS-kZS?6p5zT>>#`G^(z=DDPcoPgU?p)MoV9%f6h<#|Is^Nc-}uM z@+ZYh|BfcrMi%f7cm` zHkSIL?liws0(?4L1^DrNBph;qe|&o1g7uZc?`uQea-Ez6{*jgAuX8=3@&|#R>*NgZ z&mOy@d8uG>O6rae&L{K0cQv?3vC`lZc+gtu59e?7MNj?~>ke@Voag!6hn9>T)j@q; z749Yfx9Qkcqax4wPx*aYDt@GX-#G>Hoc}53r=C*vX8>pYyxGCuN7bJIJO^}b^2%Q7 zKG}x+VgGd&4DYVuoF73cG7dKvZSA7&V^h53cl|m0oZ7z)a^axn%j0jW`&`a1>aVY_ zHnf0#FZuR6-g#G*=RP?Dd?CALlu`G|IcR78F8|8ZU)?7s(5`jTznZ0npHcV8X5c}< zH+0Cor0kPTHpJBi{Hv00y-_xQd_B*Dw&4Ep$CSpsx-PHWi}}O&vwna4y={^yRG>1y z82=RLFI}`|UEfeQ?9M;NpYlD%^eON>Edz2npdD|O`^Zm`XMLo6Y16t~9|dRsLF;9F zzG**Ut5L-($#&Xz;-ny=bqqtuZ^WO%X z`@98jOq|Glwp#DP!N>YoIUsZs_uD#LLLZ-3C4j$er=>%beX%JG?cC>$YS1f=bx^F| z5-`r(=VgJvao@m`h1Ngt=Yg-o)wS))<>#*{Xrqh^_j$)c-nm*{!MV?~LC=-6;xqXE z40n7W9}c>qUf%UU$P0V9&oiTLCx9>Yk3EemSQ!~f1wWtrq+nf_0{&Ist-N2+@-%-k z)@8gOWP$(is1cprUxHCYguUU=Yu+UNesR11+!w$j@Eq*7LV!;jbLKqXT`F)sx8d*e z%->DC;;+cZL5{!AYW!pU`9&2xwYKb+zZX1o@^)oE_$BnGL7w&ga=mYdn-!e>^Y=_G z_w<=>RB%@m^jDCyf84e&^$O1QVBltn2krj;tonT*t_MSazxPt>L8^WS+G*d5n=D7v z^*rl+9QYnrI^4-u>7VOC_HVhgdXw6JnwS2c!qT-LFUSCj_#^?(0{!jn;Gt^#@({l~ z;3NB1-kPsJaEpvf2x#VsuVn{`83GWzIHV_wN~X*>PY*tz&Fjg$*%gx?{`vuLWQI6sqxK&Twtoy zlQ4b7K7S>?33X*V->>mUSf#S+_&Oj*{eLyDAE(+M0z3|MbL&~hizxbC^`w5vpFecJ znL)vmAeRQ}pR;;0_p$ErXMBNo`gPlB{!U1*eNW3Qhmx<5*8Xypykesx#zzbp?f#(Y z@%&CN@Jnfr<>#hr>c4!Yj9}1kV<_4+o$hPye^=e#5fLAR9eL>A3BHfJztWb^r3CJP zo$iEn2;#RjRw|o}zG#PkACEHsifQveqhWX37mJYsv0k0q8-$Rw!q&-Q{mkqwH zV=v|M?~)38n71k8rN3$Vq7iD{3jRvA^LM9LQrpvmkT+|HtBzbB27*fR@dy{%hdlH zqxxru9PKMt+b~+S&qW;byWzcA)j2Ok|B1kz$j^5ceww1rmte|+9F9{i;%bXJPr83_bgczh_YMh54EeJfh|CgKEBHd-b0b(Bi+s@>Tb>v?Jp|&ob(G zGGEz$kpVeR)c!*uNB{2m_KjEjw*q&9_U}|GM2!#c!|}k^%`Cr8jZZS#Lr^EbzSy*V zVfm;7U;2l~DysHpqumLrUuY_$_OII^{ignUm%4X0EAzn$ocEd8pI$hi_MZ;Dq2N0= zaMcW+yNY~{NBo_@uMA3D#_u;2R=?xHm$<6PXwC~cJ7xV2g}!9)?W)&edMV|;Xkq>X zHxF6Xv9y9aQ2%p*r$jwGTt&fCu&%YF$+%4EbY)ak1$Qo#?ZLobY5(#sR^Z}$U+HlY zw@#EaZ;GUL@EfYv`@5Rv5bu}5H}`w%Op;G+7w-{>gFYAJQ$U5B_I@Zsy7F0z=Tq+^ zbp%Si9WP$?{2d}8D=xwB{l2|i=sVo_6+ZHo%-X;1_uzTiY27LH3nusb)4XuDC-^_@ zU#QMkXNSB=Flrb5ccDE2l=(8`Id!!IOk*0S&llaC&J$};JJ|FdtR&O zM6TufihUFoAImq=kMH~UDlhKKs$C*J*Ot{g=Qb-p49<#HEc_{`z;fjKlifxyK?~uYZ$xDBAgVv}P_? z{zsWrt#1=|0@vxKykD#G3GKd~>3%n@&>s(+e@AO%$df*fmC3(D-jEEOe|Kc8qx}5F z<=gSxOrH*%-_u^O=kfZ3ZAW%u|JlI#J?&PDhd)?RZOKaN*X@yZ)e;TbHGJyLS&@ss zcqINW;>3LcsjmREt5?LNuA-z>{Xz~Wy`7(t1hrHae?x}L`iI2igu7OFpX6`n`Gn@s+GY9=GJAWa( zS+O5J6MBT5mc23_nojrCuvTS0h8DPq^Dh{D2R|v2LSBtNGhQ)X@nSq&(6i*2?S4~R znGK>-VMh|$8Lz3`zL+j8lJVl->*4QPoRh1x)4L>xurmwteBNW6+jO2m!P9`}f!^E@ z+`}gyH)fSA7>9A=Mmp90L-t9W{l8QF$0KV04&dzn@V&$vYX5P-`Ml@bH-kzm{hN}2 z^E|e7!wJd8eEUp+ln0&GsKii{g7fe2(Z0DG8%`$@P1U}@bm<@K@E@P- zY^&NA0-X68x%j<1s(lXNtiv1bjeAM8FAM$0fv?NUdoz6%`|TK)B;enjsk+J!xX3eK z3jYn)`9I#EuL4iQxWohhyv2okW{k5~fAH^<@b9`OgD=RowZ6ZT zmPji2`S(=#ciq#$zpz}$*G244^YibM@b9|kg5NwQz*aQ$Y5ok<%@o$_?__+Io-Q{} zoOjbVAt~&!dhy%AU#{(>V#Taa^LxK9Iv)IGY~ihoTiiM8G0LqU>szjKQ^8;LbCbS= z#>ue|LSlUu=UZ?*v%xQM?L8CCB+fj2sk3Phb%^l_J|J<9*Xh&8Zth@8r-KSy?2EFL&zjC>uJ>ZXMvo9O;?l;~QxD9Cq~CFuqE6OIKKQG^ zMZWQU@2vZl7bKs}e_ki9!v(Ln1b;B}@bBZ;@%iBSCnbEWZZ^+9g5Nuy@!%gEd|;+H zS5V_4_`Tzq3jT6`+?*ut2`aycTe`2bm+jf$7e)l>e2O{^66ZMc{ecMe{pI3 z`g;2nd>C?ny-}qQzn*#zyaW902Yl6$=Ot3R)bH(A0{D-;)cRlE>&P$i#M>`vr%`8t zTpI0zP!2vb4x(A?6LcBU5Aj*dcWs$Drf)T!j_ZKWemQT}Yx9P9TFruZpAGl-s<;#S zm@lWB1w}JYg#J+A@t{e^eN5_pEg9_`hyN1BUFLpG$j2f7(!p2ln|r2Sz~A^+Bwy;XKJ_DJw@U$T%mhE>JN2tQS7722@yZ3xcr9HK zo}|XhazyH7yv7b(ZDqWKJja3gU|1V8SsiaX&UINAVi!*9VF(qy%l=)^PkCe7@jgDG zZrE*~9e5(>;M9ySjljjc<8xoyp9;QKwJUu^KcqI%Oc9% zLFASB2dS6)=(;uB_+^ufEjsq3BBJ z_q=bC{a1UV$=rm%U2g!_CwTS0A|SrrQQtC)h^KhpTXsjIY zS%(8_-MKHuC##b5kNY7|bC%R7>jR-`U$8_<1=)yj#79k0}B2wC_~6|2q39cnWZi@4kjw zt~w?KXZ&ejTASb7s`fGd3DC3G@$CrJz7#L}djGhzx@unraE{OLgX_Dh_Jsq_0o^fo zvBg)h&wN7q&-lL8JiV`BNtlaGv;D!v~?t-E{{G*RkpqT%_nIA7)`}~H{>4tUs=bT4G4v!8SCfVG6T2TkW zp)Y3D!y~^m>$+92XmKzmqTO6y+H?GNsWuQ7xG9x5@}PTEuRql~l?j~rI$_7mLu#F3 zonRinzijPn=CROkIVJmL9h$W|aF1H2f`N0KhyQxuj9RD6m|u+3r?X76)OpG};)0&@ z_oq}-=V_vs{wbA{e^u*9ikJRnH?F*+>d%Bc`!CgP)d^L9D)3y;cdL~6M6Cnd|0bZH z3st_|sn((3A7y-~zvjBA$!h-=;C9gaj>);;~#gr_F%?ets^eTCxSY2KU`T@ z9kF5F+Tl+s_`9C%TDPz|!oQDYM*d`jKO=AF8{Tz9Oqq3F`ZnJoCCMCc(0LY1s$NmAEc31;cOlzh(1_ zN7Q^|zGb7IQ`U%BW4u%*?AQGy{bD}1-d292Nx@SPC+ctb{%2OBf?FXU3VQJ42aSAH z9Oo&#@1O6KJXf7h@sOkb*K4n7rP}WVo(%few6AyhLBFW;>F_HZIOCi!B|63oJ{>N> z&wNQ{+#%QDXoms*UiT3ZpHT2w&d4~~T4dD@P{uzL?ab@&i~Fh+Q*bA6#<%W(6%oZ1 zJRUgb)5bm76H5RW_U53j+mMIJ;IHF%qn5=<&m;NaF>_s_4fD( z-^~V$kLIW6+??Z*1^y0u8}9T86}{$Pf}iKGJfF)0f3J_KU*&lVB?LduVfp=mptCYA z%ZuLn#bhO?q=Mi3T+adifIs%t^wr|7#!>Kl$2|f350m=m_-SfYei2`%SKQOUFD!7+ z`!>=(#`B}2jkDBvntzoz)h&&Q>XbL-U7D)XCA)Wv&3Mdf`VPgl^7d+z9#>;cgoeTL>Uw&DvMa`5g0@t3u=|cmh zzk5q8T%$9HR{8y&kn^%#wL{bA`Fj?2;7{(xZj@3o|H9GkfZiVS;(wwJkv|E*dEZzU zb?lhIDK!W@1vvBXe9tx4eSm9vp67Q1simObInbvYG->Ph$XV`VlmDT|y%!U@)c6Je zCgZVbbIhzt!3_@q_tY=0b4P!1aS+$J!k;+Eaouz2n?HxC>!QH^Qg0IYzFWR~nz}AZ zLp$TOGJgLZW4!2H#ybl*>)va*!@e@byJ2C!DUWys+0U!78%lD z;Ed<1&8OA#QSc1ljAya8m--kLJO?=ARjgIjaFc?Yv!y?*k2BjJUFxggLBLrb`|S8Q z+Yh*?*AB!p5dGM|-#4ZAi{>N*1w`;$z@LFU3u&=1=bZlbpAtb&^Ly9dH1Jov6|mD1_%weo>`#C_ zIpFWRXz&Lm%?0`0>lfT#Q(H+t120J`BCpOD)<4m%%`?w=MmYGp7yFhhFO+@}^|qoEIx?&g+JxeB8o#Vjh=nJULZw$;Y!H&%9q)_UtT!GaskC^-bwd zoau%8`qX^fdRew}-i~ri`_7=?tW%-j`@mYRiI0Li(N6oT-_`wXRPbQf&v`q$fAt{- zSAPHTkWU6ZKj!^6Op1Iu+PSWn(#E#S7r3ZL{PNb~J$=5{W#;Q;J|Y6g&htwjm>9HWBA0q6a!>klSBlY%D!XT5u^ z=av$_3ZBOPG469VE=}|UuGXV$#3u{<+4oO=WX_O&@?XKvdZ7b<9{6iN4w>PfR&YLO z{Ju}k|KDXCCr-_KQY57yzsU1+<~jH(b$5;}s_}_S;LJnjN&4-56V&tZ6v(kY8?qf^ z42e(6Gv2FrSMH=w&c|~gPyJikOuk}JaOSc3s`O*rw$=lD6g&v+9FMtO$LupIIQ4U$ z&HCJIR`uH;9}e34<2pGeMgIR7`|iM|s`vdQP1=C^cBZc^qK>_H`M(NuD1$e%xN$e17$=I$h;ED85+={W+~JcF{;U z%X5F|IAzjSwbWlse~7rS{+Sc6_R&Z<$1e`N+0pM543cm=&U1fxUFY2xt%S3FzJ74z zOt>ZMPl9|3%B_vhjnql-vXQ!W|0zP1g6?tCMgSa2_WX z|8=Kzu!N@r=eTut-76RZTpkCq5FZct>wYTtjy_BH$^XjZfF69+9pU#!Wi82}nR)v) zjRVScLk##oWG+&Lx%2X=9lFsDZQyn3vUWkZmq&-(PPv^d==WK$+)lZjr9wXJUU2`Q zbf36SJ_F~upA>xWs7EW|*}z$T%FBf3Ite%275;KNImK)Prj4qc{|R>A+A;DpFb?m7fHa`?@>QLYAnwe+zz;%g|_OuO>PHnh261>H$Ily zK`@W+Tz?k$Z6AfNpmv}pM{rOcQh@94iFizDy>4PC+6(!cQ%IcW>wvXulRL@&S|P{w z-rrhvi#)$30_T3w_VnN)^89K;JLNnyaJ||n_nS1xbH9AizQ|d*-()K4e?0ktM~+tx zaMu6cp|x+y@#6I=$1D22@HbQ2qGzCZIoTiZ)Hy4bNb%Cyah~%#q0^bru-tg+3}&I9 zNZOo^``s2l)32j~N|;`cRd3 zzs#%OD(v>49i)O^PjhmC9`RwmHxJsJMuN}dcaxFLqZubZ%HfX!_g6-#r1)|>kI5GD z&edC1sAU}I<4~??Trz~)i7)>+&-({k&mXBPw+|kNlE7PC>Z2iY`!L`=`Z2`zk@EElKqRrd0vN%-27J! z**-mRJIX@szq`Th*PF*+GxFy_{*u7!aiEeaRFOyG^KHWlt1vuQ$(l51C7Pc9IV7zV7e=AKUv&kL#(t_V~wbH}qC+ zY)`MDezKWleEk6DxgQ)|_d_Sb=pcWh9}9nZ{tFK7qm|e5vA}sgvxgQPFR$mVjN|(B z$9Angm)Glwz`5P8AL!V|>vgI>1@<|?ODWTJivjVV{P2ET4Av=W;QiI%SZqP>I#oW1 z&+8vEUk`&{V_)*NLhk(QpJc2P^?!>v%-{H7dSNe*4ze#6=Xu}a@3$hpFCyVq;N0II z{?q^cq7t46ob&y|+Ar1>lW-?+j?dIhgH6SO%l@ZeJ)H*rJ5BYaqtk?){IBf48`r^^ z;P-rfc4&!|{Qf6_r~gOzKj7K)p(VXMI(+`)JYVl#?p=9YDG9d%=kch|Wy{IZ5}pX0 zXOW`e(SL6O78BxZ_| z_{#lO{Sy&~W?iR-l}pUe=k{g6xDg9}PK}kP%iHtDm-H*Io9y6M46WLzf;B&1x!>Xh zzt4;{?^KM-&*$|k+v5hm%GO=OE5+vLEB9M-!0(jQ^>SrXe!gz!@ z&sXlZTESmy&rCPz^YZCBD>X#uQ%j+y`(ts~M@oWx5b!koE%WLASO(4$&5Ql#I65fa z-n-AB(f#{L^?BR5e;hUB2z!>7Sv}{2rnF+>boXTWkojgV&R;FBek4-4|a`Ty|ub|1;l!>Ilh^87xWFRCnR5o{xAAdRY zM&LZp*_K@YEJ%_!1LyvI-8^@IR>Ez-IsP?_ac}B?d-Lt@e_X!<{Ie_1%?wUZI?e^SE|F)9$iP!tKDhpRE`@_ENBf^ZP}Uz!%aZ+BIL~>wbL-X@p^|?6YvDhStIoeSHVl(+6L4Sos9aF zFgm<^MZM}!8|2>~-{^C}qI$ji0|$hj1mJOtniuD>j&SqAy!h4fbFXlnK6%Kcpe#_v zF^k7cpFGaHQN~0z>ZgSPggYw>{aL_0NlN=wtPWa8^d-LAKzYF&ELprGc@pS^n-voY<`#a4XC&3o>@_PZ}!2A4A`Nwj+ z5^M)>1|GtCz_3ksYf3AbFe@W1P=8CRpYMk!*z#d&WXzT;MlQEB+E&n^}4 zM3m-tI{WWQQ9SLi+X?(u!<#qc@h%PLdAzeu>G6#`9%U-c{m%~k)yj#TxxJIWNjT5_Vbao1-j@3> zzt1=YywZo>NC`(kNnT$)uRrS>$DPeHK0q!DWu@`%`E)%=hp&Ffv;9NTSEtGLn?i;E zY+uBY^CM;Z^}yp$78o{acBD}6({IQ5jcX{fv_Hw+PIM3_-H)ek~PqvraKhMWiU)8IU zr~N~o`$r2?+tRW>{`L>v`kr4N`CtA-hr|Cyb(RJ4$KU?JD_mHYXMW`P+JSd_(D{Pw zPZG|vzte4h?g-fa!J9uJ z6e0X)`wBHRwv+AG1CK*_W_-=9a{K4^d9(b5jO8Qc^`9MbNho`^8Th^2Khoe=3UK%C z{(sB;L(lmJe*1UxDye_?-+!>S=_x3NfK2rF{zdwF*u~N|! zwK^IZHv#A0AHTQt{izEbyDtFO!~vf|C%nf8#eN%B`entD^ndEVyiddHhlGh+wyO#B z9)xrI(4&89a+=)Wc1Cy#^mG5~kb1o@zi%W^|8s+Hn^w6K=SkEi>PrHig>p%nYazEc z(#QKCCfLLKAkKZpOl}vlzUTrXez7P|T{e`F+ov7p+5VFk7j}$5g1m9~?|qO_T#LvP z$1DZ<4i+9-u-E8Mx)Y1y#OpY|jz82x-z3;5bP&$#{A|c)Ub|2zM8bKTWBE5G*r&;m5lTEb`u~!%Fusvs3f0^^A?ni*MD0$EEm^i6cPQL z4(Kc4Mx9e_g7?8@ zRfhbX9*%DY>iKKl=0CzE`D~m|MY;X^`?De>+=O|O^&kE9Y8~DOr}!BPBL67cynn4j zq$JPnkLAA^c&xf?KkpMIKtAV6?*bu`JhwlVZ{BUnPqKV6ItY`+C~Hp+P?PTndY$tUuy z*kt>&VRtfkJ%(HIe6KfqX5Rks>flhl+&?oQ$NTXM@AlXqVo~`HU;hWr^KjD3zR&a$ zo;f$K{y{HBtPGa$m?9!BY=88NkBZ3p4ZtlZTa+so9V*Eu;5@g_`Ue)w49ms+^JsMp zTF0VtUdBE?zlI#}+V6jl5YOWahyJzmueZa~fvYp1pXc!&5lx&mYfbLVcs6jJ$9Jbs zZdxOB(nr8GhN8m18mK=tW$J-jj|?4v`@f^d`S%R`xuVWYsF;5&kmv8{^_;7_Ah(YM z;2gh#m1@4?_T`;-{qK=U1}~$o$cN#JQ6sq>iQ4kMMdjSiznA#IF~Ipd zdLH~;Z^LE-&oeSV74hQv#86Dcr`o>wxpe&+~*Q;5@g#3T2Dj zi-aD+lYw*l=svaAQhM(t9h84dtcVBazn=R>lNOmt*}&BqkmvkQ?D4X&aear+7|-VV zYY9DZy_>E&P-Vq%)^8{-{Huxle>|Yh#pa(LuMFIuf6m|VGZzQzjD#Zpkmv7&rB^Cm zL0&&30O#+7U3;+8{~g#o`3H~lKWEaagS?IqwTb%pJ7KBdZ`k5&Dz7IzIM3e+i<)qy zKIfU%c`?BGJ7KD5;eYh0(D*?4O-1~S;4SHTe`r*0esmU`=kJ6K`tiD&zpFv{Yas0gv`o4ez*E!i}2gzukso;;=`_`;Nmc0AnB*))_=6NL* z<6s8lrVsYM2f>_Qj=xLB>jeYGXMG6~r%6>tUr>I3n(E8I`jXdi$yjfgAvgS=yZwtA z^VUcC;QKJVeoq8HQ+4Z5F~o`UPkiORWGeUz9KRk2^d0IX*yRCl{x5U(M?){^v*UVz z*Zqc)!q2Rn+iUr^WL!VxGYj)^40!XuIa%Fzf#oF;?#6n`2K>uClP>f3*62QkO|kDw zx@kW+1=k%8$hlAwPWLI&q`#>iC-$FWhKqjvWq}h%5sKFZp@h4Gt}>I zkSa~lZqmRbiq}5>I^o^zS9;O8gS)?(wbl8?WZ>!?@OhpXX1iM|{7Iu0j7OId{_{Ga z`qPc?KaM%R6SyW8__uVzd!!G0GTl{Wpl@HA;%NoW*Ui=mB0mF~Cf(-szK|5{D`%X* z6Cu}rSN|6Bx;_QxIlt|Oe5B#|o$}#ke4^0vM#}L?d|gEL@Hm!+da}U3+2o0hug};X z;-_K#ZvkKb2I8^i`AMG7WxjG8iUohE?Mh4D2V%a@-ZzDv+#lB_pU(4Ma3|zB|FOp- z3UdAfwO9Vmp=pseGEjTv{l-k_{o}d%q}*QhWrcs-Ka%T))|T5V$DQ%B!JC_@rT%4t zd>qQ)MvJzDNO&6RwF95_dO__l3FrOW6tw#Z3o>Hm{+$B3M6}xyl`B-|eHe--k1M>c zI%V~K4*&rtob6|P^0sEXWcztN!}!WRuT*NIP(bo}qlk|Q<)AJ4Up2Y7e}9epTaPkL z+IKs@?N`#^l~>y#$NkOL@xmMFZ*;XWo&=oxTZ^gFPLJJKyee=_3h+Pag!d>KKV-=J zmsd8R|9kcO`{Q49!h3u=COfHL=b_#wF-8C4_kd*~j$gvCNj&U61*+b*l8ye_l@=XUt^!^=CRb)kP<&+Vtpo-)V#l#HuKHchU7QJbib z*Y!!@x2!#AEsxVwUmDJv8VP%fN7mcQd8YAE51iM@nfSZKlC!%4~H+4tNsE&b1~!weZBhxVHS{?zNO+R$@0Y7U~eq&V<%MM)S}-QXWh*>;_tvyl(-(~a>#RY~}peBeek zUU&QQ4BW6)#J$m}sNbb=P-kH|+~?E$yx{L3qo_r;$BJ=00sNtt(`)kmC$@>|i(!2z zS2f%APjPA9NP<1-zzy?$aq@be;->r_n;r9z2mGil<9+LTIc~HrSFW$fCR&$g@;a-s zh)*m^!f9P@k^ZK3&%X;uC?Vp-?;BBHu5v!eL{hm2@s+;|a6n(v!Ck6o^FLP~qWoPz zD)=9-EbGvDCrH^Z($CLnu{|E}3$}P;S#SV*l+S4ystCUuX0&Y_62Knib6RHbmreV< zpFV&+%HIVffIsob`Zl3nzI^!Nk99A7^jlBeePa(Zzt5jI!E>ZJV`{J?S{l^LClALTS2O-2a@0zJT!O%2yM6tFDds zg6i=4>&NYQ&aK9+u%4^m`(~^Xx3GMjs=rUHw7e24Cn#?_UqEn_kPodcx^H-h<09@u#Zq@c7aF6GyWu-&t9o=}qC^ z?Zl}~cIQm?JrhLj$o_|j3%8Tm)ypl?W(cK(CqhntTkvKzbFI-yxD$9L+S`lBe;xz_ zC%^gmAujp(oss>=4jMIRczm0F{o_Xu8a+-nT(&zC`U^E!)xN}`L*J8SWEX#TitVn{ z<3w?dE!XatYQkT(D|C1B!$H7ld@%sGpyc0AM@F3MuFV#D_+R2%VMiLu1jyB!HB%kp zVWudFuLn=xUBt}={vdboPCeqoQp8V3zB9n%_XUKFto%l3etxhSe148g^_KAWLZh+! z!_rx^-=1J2`1~EU81S>(4mlK_nxC%%KeL;#-v)lq-*#q1xbpHTA0F=i;8ieJX&IT4 zTffrYbnwdTNp4WUzk`#@SK8|V|M}3+dQnMv>-WYlSZS}Jx`@YwL7jFR67%w9d(Ggr zZdCF8g5Z%p<$Ra`-kkvrx)s8>#afB4oDY-1Hyrq?U}0;%`7PgjiPFJ;r_a-*B60co z{_z<7EF1jn@~v+cjb%$jN%kn`L*v^b9=}fgqIfY=e*Mb%&;tIZD{ru;BW63;y=9W7IhBJ(@DxB|K6R~tFQYz zYV!56HxBu}8xvDfwCB_#VQ;IAq$T$tKF2w>hKQFH<;oBGrSm==OAucfwgV%m;FC`Bhp%gR-1^PD{i-@f)JXLu*O@3b#4fv!V1E+j+kMj0ZoF{p?-SGWa_q3L) z)fPfU+&IpR^LyC$t~XZK*nBkqKVE&BB&&$8??Tm!xG!%0s(9<}-kvP#v*Lce^Ebh} zc69I3AP1qydsA_qfA=%x^8;CGhY$AItEwgZ;@?ZXOfR)vBjHBiJRg?ncjA$(-wd4n zsokcNODoCSfb;t7r*9LM=_K5P_&LBUS$$LEU&v2U0HgTFE7{c z0nYt+QK7b(a{Vsgs@ftBUoHP6Iz+0UTH$?bo2DZ~smi zALYDd20!Qg@X`gnv6T5VZ`l>|Rs#55s><8Hv=)PCFZ{a$ZG2tdo-%Mqa2IgyZ{xbgwkjau>A<-^xx2>Bi;{2;a3236 ze?Iq}As1Kk`-AxV-60Di`W^ae%2mWyZHyK1QK^OhSDI_)%-Z&CI^$;G{Qd3>*J5gP3YtJxs7)v>C3;`1)Q&s&%Imd?Y`Bg z`)(L-OXH!M-{-{foxl2r8eOu^pND;F2jn@v2di{kH~QX|KNxob z=lI_KZ@$K2DT5H2(by4{(m}s425vp4(a8w+-%%k6P70_|Ng( zGUUOvtBL9jtltQ{2A%L8XH*ADUtYgyBK=>EueFD0A4~70H3@PNDsUU*d48s45Vgi>vwlS{&cT-`(F+eS6ssR0H|vfjq}|=izQi z#b1Z|9zpQ=-%$9^@%?bs(AUM^d+h5WUR+}Y&hhO~w_(kLrAnS){bt}CU+rbbsvdVs zUu4_{oa3AP&&35pE>F({u5kdbNhiF=@yv!#x9f~I>Hl(kV-epQj_FM_se}qV9r7IC zaf^mc36gLRaF*ZRqW3hdgsU0}|2e)|^N~V23Fq~X1?!)C-7Y-Qr2DG(*=L44uTOsM z_#z}o!fn9WzRmUD_(LnRWjVevz*A99ip*#cD%r>F$pZhT9B^8KB|IB)?0@Ocf4?dF&;D`ynDe^U zX4(Fjck{N7oKf4pk?pqt=l1bysR_em`xAikd_C{yQq^Vq48W67Ua_=r28w?&{9AhP zjU+k#8Ia@l@zb2?XJz}dfphz~_iw3Dvi%0L@Q>FE&CD~q$o8i~J_fwbO@rsl@y|ef zEx@}Zt*y`dhTi@f?810tL_13W?{>pk*8=SqnlXN-qf7?>L-**8%Kbvp@4xl&L&G%nEEMm*g=k+^ZPq@IZ^L%e;QA>V4+r!rr8Q`b9n0Kj| zIX|E6;p+)iGvV*2@ewEKyGv@xWwM{`;p>SQ@ZVi9;@4M4@chSQOK@Oid$!n7o*F{BQ z)~*w%(4Pi5uK(vV9}Jc2&s5a!IWgQW*PjEN$EnX_iZzky*G0Dw@!)Zy*ba|In`@sg z7C5gPZkG9KzD~lO&~F8=S#s0!!4l5(^EmJM=h9HQekbI3oSgRirXS?`(}43h)$eHX zB)R@X;F%~FOs{k{M5;d)_T>Oy+55YNdI>jRKa}HZ{d0aBIli2~*p?zroz^sXQ;x3{ z=Q+Mjdhb3b`#r6%%_Z>^(^L?K<+;_?Zze(j{D%!V^ z590HEA0B7*t%bkG`xI(N`!@0s$evj6_l7i4!MwGrcOBJ}J{s{GxV@28a~8jXi3IL~&kxxR4%tDyGi z2G0F?PSDXJa(l`G&h05HZp5$Lo=Cq3&rPuYLa$GKF6%e75&rqdgRWEZyhkk#IFI*V zyn0tHj|X<(JRXd{|M0v#9wY(h{+w=hJ=Qve1>|1}aPE)m{>ZqdlW;e19#2O0EBKb& zpR<7TcyMi<_JG_U_3!2F&ujKioF&Ik4|x-KE3@^B!%)9BX8-y9v3C7?#|tlfdCYy@ z0(x2<=sfvO^NjC^LwX`X<}w0*4~ie$a)kFize5xH`+ieRr@e7eCqqvv%C*C{&i}l@ z()z%)9-Q~;_8n(>&OV0!lDtmUR`~72cyoVJg{?Y=U=VHuo`~_H#QHrpIWA`4-0sRu z%5E&REC2VJW1-(z!m?0q7Y@jCyEt59Xc@U(q~JZY-0nt>9kN{Bzv6i)9eSQkh+iP@ zUwIVzNA&9UyS#s;YA5{XcGGgviYRIS%Kv+5BX|W0sfx(^`8-c>yS*2Cr>6$vBgM}K zIc|3cvs=UlNw^uf17&dXs!8&GzY6OtzMi~#e0mGDD>pyskmKw1wX-)L)krwU#{*vZ z@S;l40M3BeL>#(9qKtThwfkn8sV=W*lq4DAZJe%1SV^Z${q%Lj7( z>8u~T7i}AC4?+DjZzN-#!fl4*J)EK|SxtJ2XG!A-fpeAEbDgx=kcN0jl`z%_?-@%+lTehg!S_HZDx6tg|5a7m&b3G=k^_y zIi|fVuj(Y?V?^0CR&$=mXX?-9ssiWyn8AC;6kUtkInw3Jmk0T>fj7P1M-kjEeEqF~ zxQ~#Cak2?AU$`T;y|`eX zp|kL-&VfSZA|yNp=Xtznb6NE?QoEu!&LCLHF~(WpoGU^y^{gF%ZZWcyiXM`4HB{LF?OXn#sRWPA9!$pwCohUGl8 zKP4ZsJ$&7i0e<|P4W(#*NodIj2_QeHPv{j@)2 z#r25|^2sO(r~RoE>2I%{Au&fpKe4eP8v^B7FEkp0nN!VW$k3qIi{RZzH1BXE+XgU6d26|P69z4g;U@mKnl z1U(;LeHjzLuYCDR1^>4q#V3$o@-_7>;--E+4w4bQ-i!gdl%nmt2HxZX0 z2$}IW$AM1Mb7EGUr@v{OGvN2i(fHl&xc%W*SO?*03cTI!F9%DwHd7JrEvwyMl5RSD z@~AHpW%(!Zd$j`g;ZB^-LHXH};L)5LlIQ)QXshtA`k&2?1?S3ZleKyC-KlR(S-^Sf zw?cl&mq)q;sy`9IbSn2e|uC zr^bQmkN!~j|IzwtC*}H0h4R*aY5Z$WPoDT%A%FWoyLh>N{=Ii1@b-?g5pw;pIPXMh z={@aoNN)UfX|OvDc;$xcm+2)u7I-G`h8xzt2=(LM=WZ13CkH&DQ2zNoS~T=j(mYO( z{MW^H7ja?z3+`T-t(PvM52g%#<{!Px;15fLUvVSR%<9aTAIDWJ2pBp&WKf38> zE9Lr=7)Lp}_xm$s|FZ{+yt4cy{jW)~Jiout)JymuapY8GIX-%vk7K;*(K`Ga8uCw% zdhNgmIUgJfm;AS)-6a8^a4yOfA>rH~o#>B!cU3JZ*YAcLj|Z=|)p=KruM_$cA;0e2 zpjxtj`j3QP+@FfSwYA&->Q5%{iw-w;;&uRY^Yo`U@IG7nty{Jy1?`Z3ZyuMuD^1R~ z6LO3nzLYRj&UYg4G?W?luU(Y$$^J0@W6zcH_^spioCEpRiC?|Neo(%wh!e|SY#uUE zj#u=@=m#j%r+@ff9{-SU)^l^|_O^NKhaBrabT6T%tltXUiL&g$^wF|^++JD!lQ&x~ zljRe!pPmW%A%zQ%mD@`W&hvN@ao|P=*?%*B@6GZB5BDe_$@_orU$c1YHI(-{1uy@3 zedh9(^nY*s)K;5_4?h>xuzzyvX1C*iW;_u%KNq$1-+5hoj%araxW);5H=XbvYicEZ zwf<_{c>2FrzyJLnT>nq!8ukk59rF!vb*7^J5Bk2`lJamzUB+`1^}pGx|A-jPcc)o@ zbZ=olzvOzRuG8~cZ~y82#fq38Iey$<4(`3wECllpwI6=pKs4%kqk{W@+&&VapZ6_h zwfeqasF}3q)t`y$)T8R}>xIPR;!en?p`5;J%|Bu0Ts#x!`8u^gm612XB|NE*81K0K zjCy_EyBVG<&+R9=kBCEJkL-7){Oe+Ip4-oalaU{B`=RR%{@ryB?688r;q5^aBVY%r zqjkTZ&+j`(1i$vnL2pLFZ;2lq%X(3!fZs8@LCFF}W{Q&5{b|Sp&%c@A4{7pvPZaXT zQk1_~@b!I#|HU`Fd@jAOKo^Vi?7#8Z#W4Bz@>by7K7JbC=CJg8dH?$kxc#;ov+#Px z&ceQXTGW4>kmvr>bne3*JNAx$K{gVe2Aum({SMDs>lQ_o2d>Ekz8_AVxskD?`A3!h z0q%caHuvwGUU$pO`At-`p9yE1KMgesWfUK7|17^{&*!H(|GxP36LGVmd|I{Vy)a4M zjC~%K|E9}$d3~=-gq#y)_2G?1g+pF$FKJv4@~Q5>|7iqx!dlUv_-$K_ z9({jdFTYP=%E=oIxgAma$w54$A#Vb|_UqHhf!a?Z_;KK!O|Klz?=ztIB;q{3PvPsy z>O)1O@q^!|z~e{8rN8s6m(n25?W^e5-si9+c_;8pl)EpM9LDcEAb+@jvi=9JQMS19PnL1Y3F={rI$nUSy-RgfiH_ZI;Mmq&+D6L zzMg4t+$^`p6v#P&Cp}j!m)je!Z*nki?>p1gEstkekmq=nay|e3f30uy1BIWvso>$<7=t;_Aq(=W_uXlv~IBPcWP7z#f#S`PUz|J$Gk3V z2jQ8D^+`^tfA9_^*k^_;Ut$$p~AAzbCBi?h)JmFY}`la;3|LM+KT6)8JnwN;mk4 zBUA72xQ5XB_T8M|@%)$re&sTmIRVEv@J)k792$NZZI$OoE6(%$IPvS!qviQA5jf|s z=KE7-%JU=7UuR)tPyN=2L8mS+ravjZ{JjTmU-u?d_*xz>IKLeKAv*i=P@_;r@|<6m z@9^%2o8|tM1N)+f2>+^C4Qm3;Uo7AC)zMyZ{jrdKG2imZvq1TEf~OxU{NFHX^bvXfip6=J zzdGi$sT^qjvZ5cEk59WH_rFBQbN+92Z26l!e_4S$QQkh+{@pTvWw-^Mp1(=e;9|ESGxb4Dr&5E)ZXWYIF?-U-dP9#(?Y&H_@6(@ zf<5IQto;3#KBo>-O{9lo&L!&`6hBlLO?_#1T{ohaGzl7^@6#Mg^52XR5{-ky#Fc|_ctC_ z_~Q!4)aRckBvXmj?Xusi>R$K1FZL|Fb>V|D!$RK+l3f zGoL={(DWhYitMx^ewk>04W{-zr;ZVsB%IqT^G<|kxz$F2lO60cmz<+P@wtY0_4wP9 zV}yu%zqT1sol;l-Nt(R4HU;OsI(T$6t-ct+>ZR?0rWiUY4F`=B@HCc`Ab3l#TMM1 zEyph!{7?O}!%fpNM){KDbn^NqOSO{*M;%Ic!jC?{4Y=JDF1i2KHXM&F3mhIQ$yc=bxu6dsOQAzAS@c1uN zJM#N+DZV@}@q15xp4hgQ2K`)qf4Cib^kdK;P)6Ug$I$wo`zPg%h!Ko>pxkJ=57D`!!fU?f!}Cb*r(jXzza2O~$2Q>TmZoz3Nx=CzwutV*i=_H>DZqJr9nk!@gW6pCbSB_#l6*pVMRe-V5ooQnpV&PWa9C)qOFwzigigIFI8G>pZ_E+ZP9%*8@LH96D6C&kmf& znW;DbxGme41-p~LbN3m0G+45qpR-N@KCA4vb@{vH-kkjB^Y?L0`}LFZl)L_go~wV> zIJ|C6!(`(8FFkgJ9>aJMuNahHtRHn{?~B-lq=%lH;da9J!|A-YoocP%C!%!B(-b0% z4r<5AtQYOE{+%=ZSQp``3cR%bVmDsv6P}^K_nunxHm|w7dYC zyT)nZx&F?nuKz-T_oaZ`Rr5=qy6+U|$z_U@#U0yp+{IU^0!$jflp}44v zymlpjVsM_nySU=|{#)`qow;9(6WkB3M7zGs(~cpZfU=N9LW&O#(o88(pUN7|n z9;Y~-`dufS>?_5y0G#DA5`R-XI}aM)zr%pskb3L$=QkVm&G`76`5_1Q~<|@;4Ro4)EOeht)zQf8FS(F5o$% zk8}+K?wxP*{SGc2yz(&uZRhlM`QN5X~vb}1kE zo`<$Tes71DO#|e^|9mayBLVz{D?ZN&kPrX!wVV$Z_&3{jE)XCe!ODDOfPX3Vox%a~ z5vVl?Dxa6+eF@@w+eyCtGs_T>=j7*`Yw&drap@qtl=|pAJr}C~RK&}K zlHVU_#ouy!qvt{saGvD7?MtIVzu|`|pH@?aBxk*QL5Y{66W(L#NwZ~c{f<59|J2_3 zJ(H<;k0Xzhi{kd&4l)xf_aJ@-+lhL!@ptt*@14;G=&z{?zHzGXSGT;`6P@w@-(M}@ zzqztnHr;=d;}NL8I>7Jz`r`|9y(sf3ucmO3CqADFK6&Ylr#1!89h>nyOlrn&JqV+N z`m^dYVLz`s&sBV|Uv0_7jlg-`nelCvVwU;gxV5O_kHsLu?2Hk7m9 z$(*H?^zr)|`27()&+Zu5>;SJPSs&HU?`z=qN2EgUiPzJ5=xodsCGq)v4g7q*2mIQ{ zjQxWH*qaR8@VSUnnRdPUgn&o!GvhqZZ;j5j>Y$hW;rMWSw1K~A{iS%m-^NyweaiOe z0RMJ(jh3$074t{1vOT7P|6{XO{pfy+lCPXUJm6nA;wThh$lJci9_91mhG`-W#-qtD zT3c|tBOhp7P_{=pPve3I?a~Z+wkrXD%X(;BNWyuN_q9`8-*G!#eXh&jayxZ{&+YWL z6CH+2?KIyyAq)I5gE|!rGE*(Nhu3faI)Q&@q5neo-DJ|21!-K6590GWfq!Qa3x4{% zm2GHTkPqT3^I!*m+qlUC|1aZ$6a1Qgbn6#rT!>SQ3vTeq4vHsV4{|(PWtCFN@r<4> z{N;FdN&KJ>$CKn^f%ElXKfCKP_jkgrzZE>St}5#1 z@x%$fZcf3-V6z-eF@N#8j`NiU{$F1m{WK(hzWnP5&Q})rjsm8}dSib5%6vs93HusH z7J9_@aabx)zlj6?$-=}IVN66x{YIHDf~eo*Aa99~=YErdzm@$a9p_1&<_G0_ROEIL ztMXpC%n*Jg>+;Scd`-i9l%$UjZ~qK7LXOUPZTQdYN`4S(<>mHG)?(bZ3NoUC8@S{QSU(whc^PKYR!2w?p33LBx4XnbJ@BI>|R4z`i)} zl28^Xd$Jtog6$=~p|#MXvWPMT{HmE%{#CBms2w;J<3T3)q?7F9@qq2Gu)Oe1*?!ZP z!f&>JW7woUY(L4z0q5`k_0^`vb6fTK51hw?ugAarv(_j)B0LE=j|WvUU4QVnN&U%* z`0#j;0)FWJj2Sdu$_Me4@o|G6+;p!0xqX(Q{-=x&VZQY&iZ!h+YW5gx%bMJoT?GFyfA3I%U$LXj(RY?!Uhwpdtc-$eZ{9Uz~P~;E4mtuT> zrFWLgcoy{Xc>TkwM(s3ak{0rA;QHCZuRhyO{t{&N!M^%gp7R$xzFi%Sgqt82hw^;O zFSE1~ZpV4f@4BkhLUj_Ji0`c=f!A>1-!>lS$$z$w_1Ahnwvue08*+M-TP9{`<@&P} z_0N1Y<_Ed{6qcVO{I6#|_FD+-qyCnH`0(!xP2jy8T=uCx|NIhS#XfT~-VYxKe#M?Y z%?dTD@*Jc;4exo(-YMEwBKR%)_cZf;T^1s~a$S}Jew9nz!e~!T&17#${Xa+9|G_7k zm;0aJQ5in+UZU<9) z4bTOd1%vPe$S0%R(5KiUIgfFQJg!om>L|;nLM{Vky{XqDInOjMDD#*NUTinV)8PDh z3|8jRkSzRuIbha`5F>jgO46^)qZ$1BgC17U2N{hFv`5Qvq#9_PQs$A) zQ-1aE!v*;al!SZ7B~6y}x35112|sweUbp|ZWjsa^9z9Rs3HV;?2bq5k4<=>agK#It zn^^FEoD;s1*9yKoqCH!Ie`#!YlJ}YkPsDlt-s975hb!}*H2GsyypPBUKG)CB%d-AM z(M|Wu`ZE>!qrTZuH&?%ReTv`T#e!EMSU*L!KYG6KpWA8osB!-MQJ(pEBc3l~!Ef=( z+rNEL%KeA@U)!+6EXbq%t={Jg9idfvU> zFqrKidHy|X>Si&%^z@|0$?F&W0^zUwErGAKmA)YB&w^ePcpK8rzLxFJj>_Af_MHpv zC$}d%eI$Mo@XDd@7o^t#z(DRDD3C^mj@d(P1`RDKJW`g(Sf$3}YMqw=B`bBx$`*qiZlu!vbF+Ne)XS#c{QW$XR4}8C# zzpony{?pB4u7(E~_jsJ-@9WyZe=uQw*9c*j|6j5%3wd{f*KF32lfLA6S%kZBJ{8Yh zW#4+%hwp*-aL8wY*Dms{N_>Bx@D#Lf{bCV^IcxV1V6zF&!8l<8K3&ydKke7j;gkPV z#D&MRFArIq@_1s09Dl!d(8k$4r1q&x_)N(2_ka&Im^VmXKc_(6Sz6e4|4QepQvcQ} zzgIYO?5DmxQMS(w`7D%=PT!g#_unL(*MBASw|?jGRdC4LDO>vBEF6!s+S3LjXuW$4YV*9T1{qI}i``AhNp2knZAJow} zd^G<*q>tZ!m4SMW^$Hym1Rmikr>KwjLH_*Z@fxj!8-eq>w^;c*t#lI3FUrN=+TRb6^ry8H_NN0c(P>{#ju-it z3co$TqrPx{5ej)4ca;0BswG0-UrV>v=leP;9K=`dw;I8Jv*%%FxQ&^jB))RL)dK$B z0g)R5+~4ur!|&^Lfd6f|m(K&--|^eS@9Rwkf8ykIzWZ&mMY27-@8bb~^7Y8Ibbm)a zh_BrDF?=oJ^Y6eSX9C>c$+s>yga6jVVFzfupt*++TIVDx);S5_6NmE0?{(zsD5e|Ug%|5`Y?`C&PJ9**}i5r=AFUt9~5>@&6%=ed8KRsU8|mN!F=^V4g0 zd?6|R{_%&u^Z3iQhpHf#%6ItU+f2Rw9`XD4 zJm5DxT2aS&Q{kZe@cZ`+--tMMyjOdq+&)xjA7+fNiLob#$?ekyIT!Gc4(u)?w@-5| zp_k*gr*O?9T8A*eS3l&r{r+XJx69K%AfFCikg9TLS-%74Jt!|u9&DD|FTY=o=f{87 zUEePEU*ig4ANSvjW5Nf@_Hp}S`#aRS(OJ%~4f34d34^<9b*^0hIKK|??q6s;C{TWr z>j*ns;JIts4+hFF&rj@6I{3RP{_!$Ue$BwMQH~tC#USUG zMrtM81Dx|$?oL!4os6UXs=gI|bf{moxBPxQmgn~O@S>@_EN_II8D+^mdy9oYzqfw| z^ZJ70X9I7nb9ohRhawtczO%tz2Y7c2Onao?qerR8{MK+b`F(cxLf z0J%S=0?$Udtb4~Za=r~KMI6}Qj^XWhg-iK1!oC>rOlS2CBP85{^V}aE3@U#rQo>be zX9?h)IJ)Xs0SPywpC$vZb+^TqC<#x+dG1eN@9A>cAmKJ1@4?HuxcZL#emo=aY~Wpv zW)?35c{yKv|J|@k#G}QCeYV00syqkrxxexK_ZaXubv+tf#FmHd-A~Vd|J??D<3VjI z1$sXow;x^)CWHTA)sqFq%=z`RJ-i-F2Y=6-<4Xj3KOWBqydKO3zuvSR|NLLxk7ryh z;$vxh+4z5XKb{5r-%C_$N6&eyB^T&AO1T~+nAV9dtWzA2Pen;MT}Qd4zrAtxKL^9# zdFStp2m0KK8Oz6`t%tQO`DWlZ1%=Wn~C?e#aT7CYmyM#AHOb6z^F+WLJEaIZi4o(pv2dCCpXimL-W zPvL(qkl(wR1pUuPm!6`t3A^}T($DROpX*5jKYG))xq+VRu>;RSx&74sLLrhr(J3Mx z+`b;qNolH={86^ASnvl%Tptn^$Cinb>{GTcEBGt33|qou^YfMMD+&C{K^3M1XkYoB zLrep|uTFg`K>Nz~Tu&DG(^Ir3mFRq2E`5+`$Wz|Cy#eS{t~|Ra@xg_iKM;Uo@E4ebi4}(8uqePsiUCEq^`Wbpuq> z{F84S^MHRQv;Iih?~v^!K96JE4h`#sJ>QPIcPiYLpRa6(X7ERsePE#d4yArG{O9}H z3E+?2d#MlYcPRO64?pMP0{`OQ6ZX;btV%xH!}D7P_!~YbtBNw_=PSo4)epkoKTDkd z=l`*Lfb)8LF?@tL2UO|9P6cUy+=Y{;{J)hxT39-i5B6w4bn z2>;o?Ep;as3=S=770O>KaE@P_$IIUOXZeO! ztUm*Ibvofaw%cZv-_g2a1^Pe5&w}4oas2)a>3CCw&!+Ovy9Y@)-%m)r zBk~Zx@AbT(bf37;4|yJ+tkq`s(n@#&a2`MQEdBMQPR4QHJQ=)uts1TfmTb$De=xh^`=CAEyG(Mj8K6$y*_ke*gC`H;FiCpYJ}Xm+%;z=kHG@#&)_K zD&c%zp6&13e~u|w!V@6R^)DX0VX<64e}9tWTmS1}eg92@dbwl5jDVYBdm*uELP^Z1YRJigxltJitie+%R-;GG_KYg`!o zr*&X9+Gh;np8#IZ1AkWzPgUhPh@Xo7YJgla__tKCZ$-HB(0$j}85rOE-+u&ui}mU6 zJkPKc^@nWC7un$5&iQn;{QXDe`pURP#AV*dtrp%lV0~n-ay?@PKV)^Lk@gSNO!k(< z=k*M)uM)tY)9K$Uw11%F^LmEY`7ZDu*1gg((Dxse_GEzH(Q~>e?H?%hvpu}NQf(Ff z9&5Z~c%bh;vOT=MiUHrYr~Vq+KTzsduCHw1Z+`#oZ~vG5gJkfpd_D14p#1~o`pO$- z6u*6Q~gGi9HMPx?(*w=ov0(8v4q{CpdK zS28sG_*)tSX~{i&?LzUpwIt{p7I(6GP%hQ?Ke|3q)=vOEziEeD8cLSU!ryE!@#*?R zwf%p`A-0CVS6&+3RO6MA8(+_t)%OC+04EqYv3fcq(w7|3YV+OX&aNr5m^=19%jj@E&W9EKGGZo%##?pW>Pg zob$lXk36b#?8*Nn4~8AW|AoDqW>PF=|9$&c3jamDT2%t-HA9|%7nXp(Wj&OKB%CLC zFZL{${^LEk)QLY;-Y=r{<7-EX59@J5{-@ZOkm-@jwL~X9{LBQGzJ-Ms>pMJtbpOQB ztjecd)@Mi)e)k;p_>T{_>h`fdzBu8Mu6gL-=ib}&>mNUQ(CBfpVp*>ZdUqDs+_YB5 zN4{kX*~#scOKNL$^!Kfl#Q$YIY0$IFVLjV%a*yuB@Zvg0M`1V5hy5B1pCI2qQ0){r zuNUfmv9Xsn*{@$`1kUTB&%xKuVV&p#=k2fy0uHOMUo{w*x zEc(7&zY93ew};=!&hvd98}M|LmA{Iu&G#S3e}h@{H@?5R)0)~=?aK8p8tVwvE)j=> zA6mcENVpN_dA-==`w~ThB-{*~<%?CX5~`JO8*q-_&9b{wbuxZK*vI-0o-4gho2v31 zWWNjYX7G*_t5ZuS;pqzf7e){MI~X{PJ?00(UmJM5PTp}Qer{+0z6b5vgZw5#F1q}* zI(%KuwUB-%_`IKz4*u#XSciyx*!|;jGPDBh=lz7Y>X?JxF2ZTBjQtR z*$-nQZTb1i^@jy~3;V$5Oz4!6sZTcVyPY2H9$MTHj_2u!y1DwbI#uF!2kjD=jaMgYhhmK?SH4T>R zH{v|o|7FakcS0oG44nOc5x>HrmvFY9=a)ZwerA>JcR-%U$4$duy_D^D0q6N++KS8d z^4JeN9p%8Vt-C^V>({Dqzu0nBw1el@e{L(XC+0_0y6~IVw|33Gx!gu6KSto}|2N%= zb(QnuLA_@1X6{JK3d^nEFVFEQmGa#kd491$&Vlku__*cakoVg0pWhL-_aE``@Btso z%K_>y{`F5f^tF3@`aq+u+oqGx)E}~Oo_`1T{D;Li^27uChU~BB^8=^k_8N0Q#EboT zJm1t^j)wub1!a{TEw9M=PQZB;;#Pg~ncX~JQM{9Zb3U&xx&4&q9l}$A^Lk-pW>hV` z)E`{%F9W=;>)XXfNcqUdd0tO+c|CVbq=b7go)``aKXqMfs|o=3&KJST`6~vzPpWuM zMWt{gMM-?+{AB^(y}aHWgEK#0Ie$68j~Y<_e!--?J&tE)dP)6yx z(}i{v19@J@+wix{r|X?WoF{oN_Mg`&Bl{-|A33^zKjQHr_xm*H*--fSsy}|{>w6U( zt#h()o`0{x*WYz3Y?>_@4~2KhPQS#+mdh^Wp@5+q~LG=$cUWfz}mSitA7}_+$x@?bOYbe_LtZCOTz_H+`%3;N z6%aU|+iUHAJ&*rK^ZH*n`PUP9{0GkdS87(fL>~Wvv;Uzf))%t>(ZHQ33-lgZQT9I( z=Q%#wV=Feu@@cFe<%ydod&u$0L0ocxmmab2R0!fn?Tz=VqTRyJbccwC`Sptz0iIt8 zR`#!0mV5lZz( z=Y@RkcRhI=;p>_~JKfuYjKs=4C{Id1Q=xBPo7exR?|OQ`ALCBxO?yhReKd~5DEfin zxbTatpznGr-LYbmd=S9T zeECa&z8Yntb>yd9ALU!=rwjbC@dM8W%Aax^%aH7q^T+#%oWFVB|6A&R<J?MHvZS%oC z+z6cK`B(b~_ti+a892{#L)X3K3X*UeaGvLS+Q**OO1J|!&tnCb?Hj2BPVJq47wQ5p zZh*)~*;{W$2ZN`=L3|J5;Gef3clw8^djiZ``PPNm;Kz(={UE@+m2X{WJR{B zfO#w5y3hiCqk}Vk2rzHu8xI`d|GI7bqX6?(zVRRx{P>w~E>O-}zICBuJokW4A*A-e z{h#v@^3AoM)J8(ZIIGM@Oos4(W&3lL1LPxEnGXy24eHGt5Fj7<))5ZyqnjH(4Ums~ z>xfkF7uA0?B|tv%ts^|(*NLlKBS1d#jbnzh!r!dNIo1IA$hVF#ga7vAkKa?~!?%u5 zLBy5V``G@&mSFGnZ5NA`xfb7p_q z%}4i*1DLnDANTxz`*^k4NAdWc_u~k|@{cqUo`m-Y#({UB$B++$fK$KJ<2=6? z)Q-QSnzk{}^RGNkQ;o#Wf`80U0zc-P&_+6Ae!g-Ylm`C(Ie$$H&c9yB*Ke}G-@dr^ zk`OXNIw&8?_g_b!7x5sPH-2h6{O9ijpZew8*S5F6T@GCP{}{XSz^01lpWfjvAX+)2 zfQCDWXh4A=hXqusTtxv>N+FdVfffiVQ1GB2N>R}&3RP4Js8j)sidaOUqDa-RTI4V) zYP}1H6hZjC$$mcR=C%6c{n72)`ONIh?Ck9ByW#p!Rp?&>gU9_a8y<*_YfjjroqbuTo6M0tnn{j6OT-pD`l0RM6+Ho0c zj!PTx-)$V%zMidCT-M4TNx(k)HY3PkoHiLko_ z{2X5aoHI@YFYBOc)XTZ_6Z_v+s^;4rH~rQ#)+ z{>XSv!u^?K;FE!`zdCR5$@hWIJg_5g%A6R` zWnA+80`_Mi@UiPpUHM<{7qCD5z~9>Q=MMk%egXTl68Ie#7W`R9f7Tku3Hz0Q-r4-# zt9A5et#OEzW7*9C9W-BDLc3?=k>7j-LKlff4=+GB;fyTzglLRpYni*zMltbRji{HJsj{SA5ezP1<@+Z6(TN-1C*8MI0X4Y3)mwqcjI}Y&k zc^@~+KGX}pF@8epIsVp3!|qp{E?=MQG1J>fg>l4BOS)#@vY-6&zw|5f8`l%; z*W22?wkgUbsG39Y71R^!m};DFX|lDduJxJUgts45ehS$BdhC4GXUV{Sw5P>$vOd%O zA^MoFbL0bmvUS!+vOd%Ck`K-68b9!2rQ}1t|HbuJ&Vt_8(gTvOtcR5T%!mIRn9xOE z_t-&aKJ1e7-S=GgNSx8%{H`wj?by*RwEofCON2ZR%Cx}m4^L@8p;)hXr zN`mO?#P2NdzW4)|F26iNqgOyK?~5-?>-tHgMz02)`~E(GaZ$Sbgu~(f81Ph!v(XyA zAN)?>qCR-GV~j>mMm_U;--9Dt$7=MXyOn$&aL<(7-#SjCJ3uc4{Y?AkPV#+evEPsS zym?B_$E!YkyB_$ZKg{>-Du7=&|K;c8JtzGTJn!4_IoxXCA9D2?-@vV-gX62#`*!xP zl^$2+xVFlBPWmDG7Q$c2z#TjN(fCHd2|XY6oG-r~w7@6N$H<|_7sqok@bxcwsJw|Q z2n+oYym>sA0e{ElcSp-}F`P$)N$}?JTn+rYXCJ+(sjW8NoLB7uW&hOc=FgPhan;9X z(7&eVS(Aa!E$DivxuJuO5AKUi^MKORc;61=Iv@PB!;f=aj^x#H)C<4l2}itI&l2}< z&*`!sc%QIOanvIbhF$tmmtBr;lplKC{cGs^u;dZD%KgEU=EKIA;x zMM^&N)|f66!k(ur2Oslzs}7BiL>H*Wgue=O=JCBVBM!%C^uP!u zKmI#a=9eV@p+C>b_POpom6p3FO5;xgAM;+~0o&Vp`(Dr)Uk|?F=%Kgo0KEX^j|&eQ zH{+E4M!bdY%klY>f__TR`M$7i_KVTzF3{=ED=SMz#%gr7Pd%$Qef&UVsnSr|&!hZdYFtiT@LNfgMlS-L z{6Ab&^l-FBFEzEFdu`^%7|_LE)we0R0pR#tPf@4pow2}Ka0ov6R)u#1Z~0#Nr|gjP z8$O4l-kUMBL}zmUtQ0CCSg9}KHdwwIK>zr(Is&zzPOL?*?L8qzK<`Z zKI0XxSD*WS(VyQ8fX=ud_}8jS_2)M&mC7FGlm2h{AJ(7WwBh?bj=`$mB{axT^{+n`m>3&^*H|U%% zww!E|AErO(c_{DPbpLVf`OTOj)VoTRp40zYmZU#lSxSD;r}m!q7oVRL|Hto8e0+ZX zNy{-eKz}vx}HZY0`B-fTTayZJRtEBbxK63;0&Mrr%K4^N8kr>IHt`ibq=2^*o|EpB4c>WK+wrbv=)0 z&Zp(TAGl_8|1=0lkmIp7q4?A;@s?4H|m97@<(#6YM<9j{v6k~h&)F5ult6{v!+Z-%M~fg zU*su;{7qZ-_q%;X&v`-@IqYwi?6Vt&2tpm=cgnH;q3o$x`TCphtf&ZnAK|~`WTa7w z(#HY*B$SzrZ+$UwLw*otv=i+^J%2ZJY0n8^_u&dbr(YU$x_K~l6FusqIhNd~$?sg= zFr?-;E(NCBRROu5^>B3`m)0j8^k{39vX^Zf?mFTZG$H&ke(>3W^S1igMjsmE#lrT5 zC&3a?&jVb}ZflG#Cx3_PZy)F_C%wO%a-<#CyW#Xr?YH@jfqzPq4Rsj@kim0!yiS*YIMpcfA66;^^XEw{J{OU zNEAPKA!o$gt@l8Upg-w{JkXo(*pywDA4s1+;LPT*p8_dLRw(EaKG zJ=d3%%GfpR`q%s0S!~284LPClSqwR225lSp;_*dG1txjA9QD+j*Kb^(I&Y!>C{py| z_bjTwxALc*9`=Ly!7Pt)(P(?$NxX)k%d;I6I30Z;jB_rI{DM!qp#yM*WW?>ZdX#z}=rfg;W2%UL_{Kw*&%-8c)G59#1b6_DVNf(q48$@OZjE@@`pU@ zFCB0({2uK>J$*Sf`kLn`LhN#b?txxET{k`S`&^uUYH;wLl=y|RS<*kMvy_KLP9gaH zDC6A&Un*P`eVBd;pq}mB{==dS#jVDTrCQm|{`qxUgW+sT?6!eUyQjABe@mT&?!)h@ zx`5l;&2e1MPj1xncRwPRrH-L*gx`VpTl0W>?v+6=(uYDXLcRZ5l}A3i&e@4MLFkFF zuN1gD#@efR?OW)T=+6M?M-Ckd&Cx<h?2k7#DB-^zAKr+_+9D|8ZO% zJ&;$W$BhkiH_G1~Mdx(?S)do&AK0wp+j{#&CjNE@2fw28)BmNw-ThBaJKg^Q)YJc$ z-@CAHUH-THt?cN3ZudjF|81zJ|1X)bDC~D<@*v*@+~i?LSLyz@P=C^f=gsYxTe@pj2e@`O-{@D9ZT%-G! zd6)b%Ml`!i?_b;L@c!L=?Tf+pBrv{WETFqkZtnKu*X$n|$MiKz_KoqqjcGH7&eE4R zVoxY9b%> z^jE?^%09-;_t8CH(c{JmI{W>CgqQBn?Mnuo`gdCT=m7rynb^m?L;g|qE$`{_nRjTP zXLz&s^tkjxKJ(6n&#kV||KK|2Gou7Hf z3Eb9R%QN);OGZ8OPG{$~sT>1hKl8p1xcuplCh2*n5cSMEyANHsUC;Z~(8~{;)qm<^ zJ@5EvKj^QOAI)l16F;H#1o!9fZrI)7quGzGlo*isNjRtMFU0SYe0cGje|2yDSvly@ zPS81qZhkalz8*ixpmV)3t>W!`t^XpEuTb;ZZ~Nc+M`Xm_zkkx|ho65F@*@h_K5!9t zE&L>U=;Rwn_k+&sKXc==daUbmZ!iQ5{Ua+tKMtifPyTgAtCO!>0{+PIUg7OO-lqEF zo-4+FO!*0x#LTeUiEY)(8JoptMFRdlyZf)3%|Fl2sX;KhU3?Kb*i%y5os-jyrORe|^Av zfNM2>XmsP6@flNydiLM^P080c(dd5A+5fkdzw^C(pH~ivza(dPeCKvO^7##0*1ZgR zL^b#s-**jr%Cg73KY{dwC}l6>`?leWmwffd9aWU?1pTB`7)PLcRK_byZ~Z|27yB4r zjNheg-`%O_XQ!!uFFDeoahy%K6+h#L{I9<^;&q+B5bgU>4qJHb#a3I8UD^-juZlj( z4<>`uMzc-VTzj(W!9*oB|Z(*2PLI{kIV z@mG7jzdWEbUSD}FwS#_Lu^8>=1NTvvr@L^R$@of!zkMi+f$Q|;#+&OJUlklbz}apn ze4%O0_=wkH8Q}z--?{DDch1Mz zFaB>Y=#j~wbAC&ieDFS>?~dom?*pCV@7p75TR#29(ct5*(w~K(bNu~Y@u0WUu5F?3 z5c@$7Dr5*fb!)%IFOOW|WBZ){PD_Px9KNT|!G4=sFO~ld`H@ce@gJ!$j=PU%?x?;r z^HcfXh>=t5JC^M0oLQ->ilb`d8u7WWs%UC59s%tAJ#0__4R>|`CyNC$w*z_WY7yyF8tpexeXy-@<9Un zvlOKtxQ7Q!pVk9qk-=794P6I_f-C7{_J*T;vBtyJ>bhn`N@!_Wz9AIgno*j>#-}Yxc*gr zJyr%j`g6@~H`#eVBN#uRSE9W1wo^+lfPAMV+M3rRTz)n86%CZ#oo{+NyM@Va;R`*_ zh5dB}_LX+vjtQa7< zE>P<_zELmN_iea-QU<z8-05sO*z-@e`ld^9@q_pCi`CzKzNgs-io9=kqv@ zum6aT&J(JlCxOoA;2+!FyLU`pkQ|in1)bygW7v3AA(UU;u^FpJ?racm?(Y>H^-|+DlU#7)@Zp1}g@?m9v0rV^Y{^ZpiwpfE# zft0QCSMc$`mmN}kCBWCqo7b{lehrrR1mK7d0RQc=361LqXU`fQk#8NNr}uGKiqtK!{pj{p9${;zV-N@U5yfJT7tX#e0(na4CBQTOruS+vDblU_Odr2Vc$MHpZBT) zKgY*_$oJ+)m(=h((LSHYyX2Q2nnikR=<)H&9}bi`6K0LnpJz)#J@wzyy>|=!c`}Y) z%MleWegXKM;}v~W>de0*HF^o?e4Z~QW6qON8oeBJ=7+<-yi^vg(W^jb z{&{WD<6B}hdVEu5AM?Yq=P$WDR--#W=Q`t(IlZlMpzGt;i*}NLzh_PBLTj0_lYjN` zRgQk~0zadfD_))hj3C%34ScM5yc7X{`iX{P>lcUPB_2w@Remf7?#EL%j&5M!<`-QCE)B3h%Df{*b!@AhXuh}7tA z@aLf%e0=Pr7>!p7A;=BRefxqfZ|EENNii!IHb ze@F9o+qj;5X+q{T`g+oGk+O&SW;OoKrq4$<&>7#)?C$ffJ|DRdKeT7>g23>w_y<47 z*F{^C{t1hJQ~P)Kd917MuOiSXzvrfkeY(H69-_ZWfxog_UV2^ra)BN|X&-vi&6>Yr z;uFIA_i%B$m+IH}GbSG2KcGEcg@_V#KuL7O?j+4(l9;4CY zFIM)G-&=i|Csv~;;W{Jfo%(F~G}58jZ{nXgF6Lkq=#qc3MJe#ZFYlgMKP-Ew^%URx^&&2+fREYRdTE0ydPz^KN}A_-N1D^*T1@{G2iNk;F!M zbN#(?d*j2cG`gj2`1tPQtnAfVquW5Ie;#i=_=`3g-32=B@Bi?WlWjrQ?dSCjH}KQi zzjLr%q0*Co1#iBdkq7(>8`=-D%mZg;N`M>yTI*&-t7Bc!AGL_-%VfXKlRsdPWiO zJ-%_@e3`vA-h4fy9QeIc@A>uegxYxX^$d$m**l_3-*I+pI9{$h^7ke5nMmFXDZqZ# z0sbg-g&XHO-nb4K;X}Q^48OE$w1B@>|MdrkNkZqKjgj9?a+EY zpReQ1eyIe0?L|>9$#rR6Ke=w>F+C@pa0%kTz{)stc2atBoLo8ENYpOXqR>6SbKUUX zX6IFr8a*F$j-xleA2~1zbg_@`9~D#1^J<=pYkahEG;kIif-kZueb`iJ!NUUw&#;LZL{2EN(fv(k;Q3iG$b zmD%4SOX4aKdgX(^Xq2+kk8{1>B(BO)ulQ@n3FGS0N4LBb884`sL;PsgJHEZL^K#$R z7bK?j_9RaHrZ{l{FH$8A_`Vb8lfX^CJ0fgCRdiRGvWN83&z*cR#n+G4z z)|avDck-75|7`gOh0(TPGoe4CPXXvvC=5i z`)}PqN!W5^K zzzZa3|7R+{(Eh&Lqa$d)L65dKP;nXonK=c+o!H(H}tfX;C;;_LTgVnCNTRZ=1ECc>nVBn_>2t+C4&>Rm!l5v;-yQ{&^IJMiAAK3qbmvQJq zy_}2R;_=>W0)B7dbi}?#C`01V-Yh(h@=W{{*(wgJ$EotG8QGI!M7VK?{8Hc(yo$c% z+onZ~cd^SXU--nXBJc%RrYk)xo$9tL0rjfgC`%&r=6xLh3#xrZH|G0w>YVZS&e^TQ z!@hqAd5quKXS_#ZjP;}((tqW+&Qgqdz7Y6zlVYv^_5H*6mdXx4@M$;A-tu4HKdgRE z=~)SUgEs5p&g=V!ot2*gFZr|1>-&emFMFYP&&GAEBk4~)o}{0Wp_dQ*jGbbf>v)O3 zQq;qbp>+`R4CniOSN%9U!X>Dh!|;1t{PoIz{Enohi?Vb6s8Po_&yqv%Tz7_k{}%W; zUAr_k&$og%=XE#m8(uqir#!!^+aq}M`lA5&-t}&}N1lJs@iLwYP2;H)c+okS$FNRi zUjArrc>_H!$9GlsGVfmNjOn1~We4bt>ly1m{6Npke1A3xxYPD?ef7NTZmayuxW97z z!VWq=+b;nBmoo=1)A>tG?VnwG`f=uUv5)PS1Gl?);)+;pUhuUKZ$Be-^uDn6yD9r= z-@*+Gp4Qv1f?Nl1t6NUEK2DSG1w9G$m1ldtV%6pyuFn{cUf?>fcYFCfk``aF=6Eas zzRmRxXIiQqZT2)W1ncoA z`PUqe(zcB2D#T?H__@Bz!?`X;#&sd;h2QAs$b5XSh~LM&&QW^und|{am3-rSmcS<= zkMerp$*J4FkFp7>=BR62R)aq-!PPaowjXMZOM4IHhj*L&^Owv|y8bdQ{ibo547_Mz zv>$r^hWhfmrf;u!wOt+h)>;n~L*CKnd$y}X-&*}v0sLL-ep+qTH@Gf0>8tdNw&a7) z>QMIbdk;>W>vl`OC81vUWqk7YAbCA1&ryF$gj=YJUI0Av)4TB}W< z+j-0b797F+jqA}|XC?u^|H#zm_?)GV=k;X=)=hc9Z;j}CX*~y#sucMg@BA)g`E@G4 zJ@Lg#Z&Pde?_P7A5Pya8%Tr%YIn%%%9_ONuIiI+IPj6D+ z->~-erds333w+;-Q8OEv)(J9>_#IcSyNZApOO5tJ-|?*2ul$gYb=d9u9$3hEf?g3k z{mt);S3%x)AMY+P?*jyH_Mfen^2dgA&rPVqf3a2ll^*n867W0Q9&9iE(+`nv_Fo?G zzi%tqBmUEmpuKp`Dj8)7@Goudd4c#(Kg56e^^`tbBL{#NoQ(VUE0sMF8e^jI)y8u8 z#ruZhmz*I7aa@to3Ik`lB73K#o@KwN%wXST)bp!E|zxZ8qTW{s3KX*6$ zCl2d&p(ml9`DclJ|0ru6>w13I+zb2;f4#x~wXWxSv;g?-PZXc}uXR1YYhDWc!~O5d zJ)d=b74RKax9NL6>w4Q&$`AYB>Gx(`>w5Mt<3xNJ+<(E(N#JMPJJMU%Iz6$u zif7vC0baC_IN~}sFHzxUXTA0Y=NF;7Q6Ip1-g8$}F5^|`e#ompxuo94`CNwzo!8Sw6&)81-qV065}ZajEdb4VUE_m5B| zZVTbBYRI$qQGRiv43}%He^9UZYyUnR$MrjNu1Kw8omVRk3n1_EcRLTMW1UxPJ}m`) zbnCB!?+5GpN&YP`#bK4Eum1aR9G_e_t?t!yd4%CO*j4NI{ak&OU$&RrZLPzuTJxL- z_&1IY>??NZM_v6{2>j+>Z%okpPWYt%%yvn=^q&oUWhiM^HO_VaNZyIRM%f|!2JK(p z3(8H;OcRV8#`p@o$Dag#r?>c{f^nz${%+{H7=MrU`EPF@!?tDo`M}40OCiqR{NcKL zB2_b?ztWEZQ$PAOy@UB6PR)m$mj*XH_%QRH(5=@hJNbUb-lPjp^FDyk3-La^9k@S7 zT=zh%O{pOL!+kC7Nd#`+*rMDxQ-6xQipx}9^8n{vm^Oy*$BVpL_5*j|s`oD9d*pP0 z^tai5p-F#N!ViA%2XLLQ66f@};HAGU{c8GK{A&KaKmS)sZ^1h)F%}o_=HCruOmdwi zcpgSOv2Ig4jtj!)0~@}_AUxu)0-QUt74FvYyJ8u;LN9|nXQrY*`NM5}qtT$yD?u;I zQ1qqub-Z5YF*(HFemwud{XC_zMZN#bcCr6l zT>b^pkCaiCuKgK@Y_<(Ue^(_PIzeJ0W+R7Lj!&pdQ&RI6oCt{^$c@4@}u z0^pAPIQ{Qvjb4I!`g#1B7jKEt=)Tq}zRQ8TVC)UlsK7f<9;K%`4*|U-CZlDE(Ie+=Qg3 z`pSJI{Sdq#e&#x=1o#h|w%Sn7rlW)7JT8EJBJbM=fM0Rs{XiY}k!r0c;;&QouQ>8m zOSz8}p*11nrQ9@LT)+!V{9pA!c>lz0m^e@Gp90|NAJ5MEiS&=~$K(1cuhYEnOL~=l zeYza{?7u;)x15ejQc4Env$JZy3b;=?54~T%zUzQ|@*f@a$7Y>Bevq=?f%3lXwyStu zLFDtg72{*-&ZWzh; zEjWVn3ZCOB!M;2R_}^ap{uAzJh!_7QL2e#!m!D~~S>Ly?->LsEzt3_zUe%Rzto!-T>Qv$g~Y=6dpe%ih*^j<0RUpa6czDg-E@7u&*B^U=)z5`yr+dpD6<5LrM>-xLE??&l6*X&PSf7(U_)bIzuM?Eutc(*uGqgzHO`>4m9wV!52X>=Rt z)NggA-yN;dIc~^*!P+C`)L-U5jvp7~xKU2JWlKy9GKTDx+9&m4c)$q<(t-TV| zvp=th=>Bt@MrWR&UJop9yGUOjRGIj{z3TpETtDgayBm7M-=O?cSk}ES{jTd<4tWmX zp8VwD23AdqX*LPMHMS0nhDkUD=pckQR-+jj~_0XQk z%R{_dpno}Vhmv|7t)CYzPw;-sFTB4{1^l?clZP6Z+84YH^4%zHH!A-;`|(xD4c)cn zS0Jx&{zwA;aL*mT@%P`zCH55np9kFBgf*EsO?irHdYT}|KRf;?t z@a4d5n)l2%@xTS;nXdC%Zc_IASbFK8rjBrVL4TR{8#dtgt~qnMnXNY7yx&LyzFF06 zGx&WEas~Zsx}TK?eDtD=hF)L*nTLc&uKSqx8&WU(5HHp>CEyRB6uPl*jjYzr#ZQ)x z)jZ7WAFpS`?qgd*w~thQ;qO26+I`8fND*cn20gma^gQI`!wsHLR5h+W;4i@SoA*9? z^+}CCCLeTOf4lL(@p{n^AnhlDUW~G2;?5hoD>+&m2^4mSJp_eYd z40LOfvUBs&Kys`m-;R3TZ#aG9BO~H8I`1bW0(VKb*XQ!~qv+3dln3-Z5j!sCbv&U{ zf8PwHf13fjKG*dx1|R)nd0@t;y8el@54ffG3?EsSe-dUY`DrKIS-O1d&B|`dulQ?o zeO-Pfe z&pHa@8~4-ZKAyLsF8%DlecEr!uDbL~1pN`;>ZQ7VcEk_AhdTQAtKQM&bA053zghO| zox1$u#j0P(fA;7fVc(bM_$ved*`?#_>Gl<)z7l2ThHmY2{XD3*j#hryvS`dB^|kR` z2EW-szx$b~zw$z45Z|Lf6y9Z^^i?LitCN>l-gG zs6*&QCi#z)w%M=CFEz=ZbN2KGz2Eu$YkN1-^EKDEr2l{ZbfG;r%1Q6se5-D60qW_`#M|HBqw7-wI{j&Bcji9b z-g45hPU$%Hi^XyAHU6vuo#W{5;SbE_eJ6=C>cWyS5&ZC=5@XTh%rQ>+FZR91wm!1q z>_~wKo!_4h;Jae4Uw8JIPw$&_6X?-C@bS9E1K)4E6yk+HrVw=Y+n-NO$kzMK4?6oT zE8lUw?xzaSxlh;_81;Cp=7(y~3%aX*Kf3hYEt;P~*L^O&r(YA%%XjCleQVY}>V^Ih z&SYgbulp=0cNz|^SV#mC1oA9-2U1^&?9}IuZfTvi)CohpDRCW`Qt6} zzhQsq`^0R&sr~mo1)DDoZllG&epCC$zRJ98;4@oBfIp(b)c)$sZw}PIV$$7|Uk&;* zX#dAg`X_aGZ{`a^m$*(Cuk5ogRsIRIQ0v31Uw$>dzD-ayhu{k#kK@1z{w~|ImN$Uk z$szsgS)$~6h^v04r95vdN3j1<&-t=_y9<8dcRq#g2c7+U>!OLPwD0GJzJE*qz1gr) z@u+JSc7XhdYVfoFRvz!Uqsbl4eWWMcs_bX~jmc>-tiJo=`$3O%g1#31%XnjXT4k5W zT|yUsB!gax__rh||0V3LmsOWPDxi-Kd{2z|HADa2Z!zlKeU;zRU-~ve``&L%8R!LQ z=eu`an9J{-%6IybP2(j2{Z$FRoDY5(ZvNeB{ri44Z> z_VfFG0p@SuOMKbWWgnv-(x0K~=1=4Oq+Q|rm!CUt zZbzL&ekJ(1e_8bFAJduRgl?Un>?y`N`t$V#yYzfw2i*$&?idmMt)6$e{zwGw`HinO z*4H<@ui*iG?av*4(APK4-QoI=4YX~o>t75$>c4%)maV$}WuR049qZ<`()CY({7T>& z&S>92*Pr~f?@+H7+Ufk(iO2^iw+?+VLbop;auY!>4ZL&%`_HiBU+0zJ56dAKjD85M zU-BX6!(Vzfs9d^axImry^Guh{TkGq7DhD6^H137+GrFIuK&PKNd^RHNJH?d? z)%c2^r0o6XX|pat?#{1oA+XTxPKgfyR!e!{vWU6 z`at;EKKXBn>$XDYcYrSm<@8r>Grm)zI@rjIq4(PP`;lJYTKrM6kn3%PL$JS#(H{lC zz0o5nN?&(Z%@6Od3l=A?)cq9zAFp4o|GrN_oK3YL_E_A?PTG_F=XZ;(8lC>I0XO3D z$qnjhbhcjrzrOszZ$l)c$qf%~+tf?*hFD<=6{nt>gSF{w%`v zD~^X!;D&VRyTd%s2%gV1a(o1U|FY|*5!|mR@2K&{eOY{p^3#XSpDNY!Zt5Zh_@ur|9R@QAA$==&j6405y<~{iMGChBkgHC@xH7sY9zV4;JtAM-xf_*!6e^Ea3 z(>IB0M(gq&so~?r`&MtOE!HU( zsY(9IN#!|ue-(iqKp8pW`^oYhXE{WE1@?)SG-ZFIH@04Op+nJ){)#QZe3^*(-3DBj z@3*$R$fj`oEAl+RyMSv_bV2h3;Dk;;dO=S<^5X{=*U&@zqNXtN>)RTXk8u7He7D}< zkL13kIp|Y5w{Fz*if_h>4x(>4H8M$D_X$53y)P6??uEP~?*sxDu_f&!}5!c0DePs7PobRMxt%&b3=reNLmRx-t**(fncF6y> z%Lixmc__602kwz2OE>B3ve5b;^wj)w4t-t7^*7sJ_2aj7uHTEnUog9Vq250EsbAdu zjL&ub%fMHOa@ki+-_`ZYN4+&&*|{-qW47);u3IVp=bY;w)#Y;?lnDN-J8ryJ*Uy9c z1l*r#-1~Unu=YXcxOr*QxYoLV*gpMpHum-J>uSFYa@v&SJfyc@X==Z#_nokHyY&ub zH`~8@-M)r;`&`%Cfm?gxo@Kg!5>a1_cG5fkd6zyFYqw+r_|jje327z7F-EUCKXva?~bWex*tNHI`8ky8JTGt<#ksT-~~kV!kx; zPOWvO9k}HKle(Dmj^NGf%tYXye*cyCIqsD8%6_i%eZW1q;Jr3=tuxDDr*+xhC-wd< z10Vgj_qPtW>+2f&uM)UDOCL<;x1&ot0e?ZTC;O-xEaKFCJ1kzFVeYRqi?hih9z;%rexZV*%>f8r% z9asq5;K0y7^mQKhDU6@qbNYX+$4@2r=+DN#{Qa5k&oa=hS<0?oo4>w6Ung>1%=~k5 z&5K9${F4Yi`g?WmcU|>$G5zfU?yhO$AJhFs`OL2k9+`VumtSm>KiS*#DqVg)=w&F6 zUR3XP_NRo#r8oy=o;{L$amY~_!BD@Jc*oXU8izu6z|VIx}T{gDhlE83~f z%=k$6rxSD^$`$8&Ea9{-@(WQiOJHe~$=6sOYy~j9x-RwcWbOLw9+RGQKtN$vWC8M7A7w*0Erynk= zS+9iFxeKt)3v|4pL1v|Eqx6AcUud1X5cH?Nx#^RwzDsWhJ@os0#mHA*Jil=T`%(N; zf%f^_UWbX#dh5G{Tj^H~x__Bk*Cj4~yLSUukQ|(k5@sm-IiEBtU3Rn~=n_x7zUu^z zzZcYU!G3Ea;FPrBIy;0<#QlV1@C`cK_GDuRk*YN0$NHfk??2=Ne`3a(cbeF0;|qc3 zI^GZbwawSG=X#c0;ve3Bs08lT>f{tXz7l3C`+5Iib$YM*dVD!SXMEn(Sbf2Dt4D31mG3x4*`OADVr z%J(~h{sX-l<;jts**Sjo`z4g`LwqIVDnHDd_rkmcV?0ODiAE`Y2V zi#4qL8}uv2uNSzMvtH@N56KCg`WJ!z{D8v?xIZ%Jp*->c;_R5G^a~4asYa8oY}zt|LvEPfHUux^H9$`Yu+yxflfdC+kSaD z?2Ed!`M8+1x1Oba0q~#iez}zT%vOFe@0T5@=eRTPmy zu9$Bs$2wAot6Kpyz-4 zSfaik<9?Uz&)K)3OmCm}yDGr{;o|#m(c33K^&5U@;VPZK8hi;prT^x0ht}x&`9XJr zzVOHF2Xy~&ze@S*{^t$*ZXfp>KJdFrFAn=Xw?fo&TDewl86wMqW!%~v>e`P}a&%til?yLE!@e<$kwkaN$RZ+v0)}LDv&7FJo_A9{e1a9nY&5}8P%lvD;uaFGf!)G3^b)8P|=KZn{_`#o! z|Dvw_GS}zDz#Z7Lt+T%0VgFKp*STM>(DxhkUp4q&@9hcHsHy^mJ=f?HX^Dp;b?ElASTs=eY{|fNYpR3M1xkvY>AM|RJi>8dY zSKps;Kg#^l>h)3o==sGtFWeu^J{-SL-;dJY$-qSvCEl$2i}INtZ#wq(7+rp$Nq&R) zOf690=`?~@-_sjLtn5XpkqraGb zHhO;~&R71RKWD$_|3&ww9dr-Mqz!q$!JJ_H=cAtSyE0+($6@;s=v53{>yPR`ukS~S z5!Yp)Ctf*Xptc{0sYE^Jlj)~6&e7M~$;fBc1^|l@L+|S1TZ}$?emks}f z)}hC-4*RtEbNBx^cw+G3RH5^}%?Ym44jj$&zSMBB^nv)7zc=qk-Wlg;J6@k}iqSsz zvwcz*ZLa51Jt+KTpmRUF|EKZO>udB%&^g}}ckR}{0q7DhTwhu9l>OWkWZZ zt<}AswS#Z)C9ZcHIfzuHAwM=B?Q=hy4E$Z=nl$G=i(G>D0MB)HKJd-%E*{7GH^htm z+|T-fo7~3!KKEThuS7lfvwwZ|T5CPNtP8`(bFX8oFV^BKw4XhR{`>IbPad3p@3}Ri zgUBy7`S)zqlE3x&*aP|8&vtxzb3e|P!k-U1*VWs9-f=1SyL$f=1IPYpb^Y*bxbM~d z!QUq?13vv$XBX~!rM+s@b3Z#}@ySE%2l0O*=-kgHEK>d%IQxZFb@|^8yc4){hd*7c zk3SFUxu0!!;N#=^_~U+-@!$07Wpl#fAN*1OhwFh1TWyvFo7zF-_AWBj^+dv$T=Z@KRkJ*mGJ z^f~7iUDdKCuZQx;ImFqN_$~Dg-ucB%qL#rQ$|DhY0Di|^UsuJR88lw#qHj6mp6`CP z1bB|KDxCj+`&rw)$`9uKY!d33XU+RrFX;5czwKwEVBZ^WEx*31XycQ#uLS((yPqup zz8s}_KWn*9*}-vV-p|@VKi~aq0sQ9zpL@~k2jqH%Ij)#*^RYj41Ap*r=3}kJSnZIw zaU%W-fqV3u`<&eO3Z47e#8JwgR#$!T2j_XASAx%q{p`UD4{g`y_hiVgggyx$-Tk7z z{^Nete!r4`@Ys^S_5D&AzPpeJdb`yBHPgp0_nVY|@#HQ$_4Q6Q+Rq2S|4jSKb@?9D z7o+qH{A;ytpZhQM{3z)$H|4Bi`-bmNHHAM}V#rz2vvP6=r=_M(Ntv9Hc2jn)=5`rx zq31EJis0~y+fNi1=<)+5`LFEyV2&=o6m(0zvTw=Z@{_t>E8%Y& z==q!Weyhigr8?a2_Et>?==!{8&mjDPfyz7GhXp5wc6ePph_4{%Zb5@r9dgL`z=*R5r=AN2SZmV=BPX`gw_ z1^Vpe|4Y}_6`_1S5c%xy#ft_HE$%m1V#MGN-XnC$=S7fvzWF>4 zc;@p`od19Myb3sTKDRAZexd)(`P>CM{qS%3dOB6 z23%YJ@7MCZ0HHIV=R@9}>t-I+$CV#^m7s4;tT?ER+sNdb)qM)S|8Z(+uSwH~|Kt`m z4EYh&;OF}vcLaKO=zp;KFzE@)l)ZfaDkB<2rkOAhf@1?=$y z-}I4$(Rv;!#`|}S*~rQm5BEe;6^S2`wOyOwdz>wYEp-NbU>UyFNVVl?C^X(})HP2cmV0={4W zS5L;+h*YJ>H~Yu-u=3AWZ)82q>yzXXyxBiV!2kL8z~KA;x__kK&HfQt@*UR#=#>Y4 z{_aEx&UHERUCJ`l3%^18Ync3F94syP{%mr8H9 z)zU0=9`K`lLzUKTs;qurl@9!_U-5q64yw{p4SJ+nM_05|rS~#b+Iy(djqlUj2dVS2 zF{;eR?_xRUsPpPPRTeE&rT;!vR^_WQd5J2$_)e#Fg*q>KT$PphJ*a~9>fF9nm5$d` z>3?07#qX)I=mS-{KUAe{FX$*MK2hiPFH~8zAM^vNw0xt=3Y5;@)Oo@0sG-g1pXA)AS}72NtxxlB`tM` zPu~!Weg(tPFOMnx(|>#6(4%+s>5c~-YqM8PxP*JeETmgFmmQ+zIsPwe6E;+pFV8`W+{`i=f#X@@*FN*~GsQ#)0#vskMazfn(? z+%r!}OU<|?C2Lw*$ZIO@*ss-)6Pt7Jr%qYEX0)@X{9_!3?9d^020PxUnG>qDSnNjc zCl)F{67R;jjuZY~;A7m$sb0@(Tv9J`iy()1KhAZW@cU3-j*@cuUH@uR{U8At2lbWz zMa~fU$2hW85&SE9*q;cu&xLaxr}I-^5un#|EhY6LHxF`%FT}Zy6aHk>m!PCvAL6UR zRKHdL#$mSac~xx*ZtU>C=wW>_+&&x5b)4uyxztxg==EJ7Qwovmh8*I3IM;E)??in8 zO5vA!=0Crwz7GsD+cyXm!HtjzF%HqA68s_jDrK*ZllHCwfY%L$U$4JjDsYHg7vvD1 zjB_0){0XS{q7)HQZ)vLXL!qgjdWG}_em&Y=f>H|6qYV7S2XL=Ie+a)`-%%=X zh+NxK%1^{QajxTpzZ&f&fi5DXp7Wc}RNnxKQeWb)Mui@CqDL|Ki7&;uj+6Ep0l@yC zT-NLTB62NHEBlB~z`2eSxfN*70XpS!-;!*qKOg|(puY0I$oWqGF^-<92>um4^1)Ah z5zcj-@E-yn=P5bW>-BySxdF%_z8dE`PWb((k6*3)LAeDnDn6a2`f*T{`VyapiZN1w zL-g=~pZGkS>p0P4JOJzu5uw-jp-`g~xuuXpdaERO@$RXa3a~&uAKGc_^6cJL-?PMgr>P!61sMq6P^spBx{}AuOxsH?eD3|(DF6(L;Qd>P!6XsMqs`=wW>(+&&x5b)4uye&$27T;BVYdXejf9O8XA*Ks1(iTVPR zlv`0>#i!p?KTH6|VYZL;4=Qr-ujo+;{t*6IWv`ACJ;+aeMSx!4+$7fpIm9R9T*nE2 z0_wdeDVO{ILQ_5CDx@#;VEtl~9%bMsK7ex_Cwh>d`ceCH^(c*1ab$T;*~9v;|3weh zb3Y+4(Zd0L>XC?Z9VdFYQO}a?IT|ZH@=bcQ{}(-2-vo3iL=V47k8+&rIMJgL^(=*7 z>Ju=o;-3%qM*{&E2jfWo7d-9L=PS{}1%Bd_ajxTZezSg*tH+bbErcB6OK`5^M6MV0 zWhkky9s7bRQ~eMqN_~kRfr=SYfkX7Ly`cO)jyjFNIKxNcHzs!u^X)R%bHKLWZGqK9Q&xP1vY*Kwi;`I!gIa@(2YCPNPK zUYzSVk?TNxK1#|hz;&MzQ+*q>(?V-c154qTdj1}k z6Li+c$v?(n_A~8eJ{64U;Q>GKc{tZ`(jNI4_rkB&>+`0_ErlH7D{!vkguf8=RVXRf zf$KmC>%;TF)dDaM>MQ??oPqL>aa^N{;9t=r5&XovajxTpzYq8r_j0P&>+vsgiy()1 zKhAZW@cU3-j*@b%Sl?Eg>Ni3U>P!4fs2_(?3em&9A$**;aIWJ-56Wdf3cp@|iB#Ya zxp|O7d?C(tobV^3z67O+ka}KUtuWQEK^tcKo&9^VY&h3((jNJ#ukh>j z9EX(ah8*I3IM;E)??in8O3E!leELoG(_om{z8q9^69G8HzDn?i@GmNRb)4vt4glj# zMCkQHDAXuLt_yOAPsX{96aEC$dr?wuGOiaFn(Da^Wl21L&$!HlUkJTI_8I5W?tQ4g z5v3HOcQyElkAF$|L&pjKJ>X;i$*Eqi=TVWH1UbZeaIWKo-;Vk`l$6WgH7qvObKa-E z#8WOysTVyez)yS?&UKvVVSQQIZO;4rojV8UZ0{oZ$2cfg{uepSw~M6$hv?x3Kk+`C z>o}dCeiIRTy*_V>TtDOxUygGfC;SDduS7|?eq48p-=yqkeHZ!1IH<4uFLHXwKgO|2 z6~VuvhYS3~C*xel2|vdf^%Vhny{@;&ErcB6OK`5^gx`z$GL)3-!up}gRL^;m`V!Ca z`+!v75It-q%0I+AajxS;5AsuA5uw*}{UP-t*9SSo7vNmS34apmi&0Xpt)ALPl$+|m z7l3h4U-@6;{2~7s$3#^G|B4=#SHkT}z`2eS{vW|dedScI*ZW1}CPNPKUYzSV;dh`u zA0_3MMJW49O!Y^hhuOXps9%dx3eh6~e&VZfuH!_HwH!Djrb&- z>p0<$N4*E7@JoFq_9q3V`tJl_95Jd0{uMmyb@`%4Dfo%6z`2eS{wmb76v0xTkNs%E z=I}gl67AD(#Q%f(B`Bp3JrcoByc_2_PTD&KK8_bT)$50WE``V~f*j)gIM;E)??Zh# zO5vCKO4wIzs^264o{qTa_b2r4!!h?&IUT= zda!OzG}SK_fN@Y?`CsHbE&mvYE?@NUfuHz-f6-%!Vh^n^Md`Dj|Vrdm)K49Y0!iEQjck(IXlB#CvhB<3tb2t*7zp^?KZi+!Dwk zz6|F&PWbatA3!PMrQY65!>GedT|_FOYwXgZ9h+qDR8p%0I+A zaIWKof4VRj2jflt*Xz4T1rCwxg&gAZajxTpKN0msC`E+SdvM>POsh9^{EPD~%lIdh z{#7W;pH$~1t5jL=lq$VXt1=1q#T~d$9FO~{RVd4G|F8u2xe9QfDFOFaics2dzrl*@ z@|7sdaNRix*IymD9vP48c2y|Lah<9J*JlDKOL6@o5&L*M_O({*|0+?IVSiJM^}Yk^ z-gvAJt5B9>Jye2uy8!cM0`hth$~@#jH}ZuGSy`p!Nyyo4Xy`=Gwm3t)~q~H0@3d9pK0hAJlv&9|7l;0NV;^_jwhrt z`1~g7J$TOa)@Jh;HT&Yl`Ru zH_A`f-*@BLu3Lle@fbS%#pi}u@_8HHcj5I;UXSzPx_|?vv@P*g0Qn^-rC$6;{aA*c z3(Za)l{+&%Yg&!E7SWf_g~q?D{B*G7jQ8uI4+f`qk$1BQHV&3a>eMpYlV(fJ&dN#8 z$xX{joomaUoRK~)CD(Xd*JgyaCw+2yZjNnocCIIgN}DmuK&9o_QgUtCS;Cp=O_`aV zW1uIe7&5xsAU0S8^I>x}Z@HnD5JaEr0Ax83=R-2RxpQqPSyOB|hLIU*xrXRmPg?fO zbfZ;6quJ?Gf(ob3Ov_EP<)me%WaXx(igLMWzT9vHq zXBn-C+>{L4%(R^BSu<194A0zQ4D|Hbh90RYS+*Qc%FHxdifw9|VYu;5vMnVeBRe(d zIeJ0b=W~MIovL4?8L@vh+G9Bj=ZWc447+Vo1LDW zVGPz&ETccC%}SYRI4>=Y z>IUPH&&5@l^yT#embXIRQCTV898b0pBwoW)X)|Z1*_7|5rpue!wv;K^UL!kpo0>f{ z(@<)5x;zP8@jL@1HB}! z(|m@>sp+{HMnL6EPcwX()gycARGSgRIl%}|&#}$QGM=Eo|S8O z)01L^zd;HH;M_1j@%c07`{DX9j#v)S^zo*o&ordX$)1@p#qdRH_RJ|cMk`a&ylKWC z!*ta#vr{q*1#O1MY`I1>QrjArh(GvzQJJZIUiV<>MEe6_gw3!y#fYek3<+jqa2fHH zlb$&%BR3^0Eqhju;VVy?pe_yci9ojm<-bV4vZ zjX|245quROIE1pYb8V9)d~;LMvkbpTR~RN69hYMyWr_MavQnrM4B5f)g?Y2oqz~<8 zc{TJKs4TM?{x&9VHGqO0B0XV5WV$i#B;^GYiqR#W?2IXNgS5x{&Plt&?Y{x?S@Jr= zz$`6}?#MPqsBvzLQe(8_GR?|hFq+Kvdb4wkcncd6IZU~l;i3oc50{$sa6u2218_dt zV|2Xa=+sa^$)L!QL1?&K`Q6AQGKdZRjPyGvJy(2T=#_=GrCr|FOe_nxpZ2mGj&|v9 zJ!NKQPf5$L8S*_wD5|j)Jj*r)-Bcqov*)N}CRt+UTw4&XnIG(T-hV7L=`jxNvSeNu zC~-D3Ma8^fXNHj_Rqq=eTr<~nwarX{JB%E!LQ|9p&Va_G7mCi@^vqD=6uQARN4NX|~rNH-?nnMT+d$x1Y`8BUX_ z$LO!Dv>c8F5hLyJew=4dxZR8cmNoH^l_u*8W1hHU)|6?PlJ<Z zP7Cl=jkQV--Zv{Z>CqeZvb+-K165cVsU~Q*(L91JEpxIl8jP$c>dY~Qe;PuxrbV%v z_py>cJU_cfait=TH8Q*`qk{cvbhLD3&A>zE>1xc>My@dOLWU6rHe;?xlVx9x7Rqkk zZz?nCkqkRoay*PStg2ZsWXY_Ynr(O;i@ciISS>UpAhj9Fm>oE~8z~|*okJ<{3-1pl zeH8AOVbF(VVyGWxrUh47ngeQ@mcY+QPZ3`kfs&G*q2h6RR`#5Xv?`I@EUo{D8 ze&YQP&)#r9jf6fdZwmPdks4f88L^pdWJXD%sBLlKpmz(Xfg{$=!3Zy9E~tYVl|E5H=2KC8&mUa5({m zjU{@TF{_7W6lI*~!Rze>COvw>ewKVSx@J5D<06{lvK=3}2=!}_=cr3354Vw6s- zpZ>41Yk_vFDA&p9DNQMqv=lrDVgQ8{P!DJ&=mkT|BZVSSS`CP+r?j<^4 zGXo4h(y9lkpD4;1c6eDwPDB471`#$3jrEJo>Rs;UbB5Qr+burXFEDAnE3(7pv+$u~ z$7UVB>lPs;KYkBPIr9AeR`cAy(mdZ^*F3*7);!-c*F4|*);!lEn&&)S^AYTuP4-G} z|C91^-%ZPNA5Qb!kJCK&=QPjv6*SN9j5W{aewycVIL&h(u!F~QAGf?l=5?MuLd>Ea z6o4gQ1y~0L9<}Wy1dIUVz$7pO%mItQGO!A40E3TNy+O;Z1pZ?r+X9 zGl=CYm#%TD+vo0=MIX2Mp8h~=%BqoTHi(?)+YbqdQxIOhdZk&cp0;k?nzdkjp1u_H zWPx`d_KDngAARUV5t8=BecXx7RF>yHuFISJJH9j5ey$>)29Wub5Dq?J%O$*&hxJT6 z5O$a?HE&yMc=eg9=dS+Tu(Pe`m5cj|L(mu8ddV?YtytjQj>6`Yyc3hI4<3dBF*ZEVAt3=Xs{D?f+@=Le;d!=XpO{?@e|6ca9KaZ;P zy8ONT$9~^%(wn?G_MxlrPY7~Dz&x-D3{_fw5dY+mF5>V;|8Dw&$a4=CtXsa4K9>H( z{reo!A3x)UQ}c%(c%#UO9`3snxvxFP?nIrIUOv2vJxcVIpr;Dla?)Ezec<6^c#C>xN^}`pUKiAt_?PDyl#xzkgy;UW=6V0sJin{gJolM3Kf>pZ zDqr5mwR{@=RP+2ET=U#7);#9}n&)#8&2v9h^ZX9h<)uCG`4w>zoNmUmlv!nXA!!F} zAA`TO?Pb=c6Ar(8!ZBM#KY~XK9|_b7`L6L1~`jrRF(b(>(V%HP7!yG|%~+ z<|}xPs(J2bYM%2!&2v7e`5}DItaAfHj~GukPW`H?h z5m*LRfem2r4=6t{3QPb~z!6{`I0_sC)_}e$$`2d_#(+b>G%yP+0879Munr77WA*Yr zUqCwwIlO6iJ>O$7FJY`V&qdlcR@&ylf3*7VSUmH_%sIciSMo9OeP!^RZ!A1**I548 zZQe3d($^5rdF%9@@gJ|c;Ecy4z1YKfGm-1lwY0~XvWmXIpHLsbo6fyr!|V;`Uj}_0 z=g|3P;@mi36e#j?z9YjNS6L3C$ng^S5Yls8q8yR3f+ElSId7pH(Umt`hy4YVvjPk} z+p1^pJw=}DfcOaF^?1W|7_t5_`yNX?YSDKZ5Oy=3<1+0fx^{czM0(D*C`Z)t%$M^& z$`M_8!*%$jgmTt_q37ED!udiL@o~g!znC{#yo;EGe8$ly^WX&hTX1-{e{kO=w(F0F zZT;Mn-nN9XyJvqpcX&zs68EJiV};jWpg-_uTb^?sKJ@TsZ@u9;G1A2MMZg=~-u2;u z&koO@x6Io{m-Gq5v%f7|w*Jo46Ejwe@Sf~3o84XQNkd-_c>C9<-u%dv-QME_qpxGV zLAxYB@mm?`YCzh-^*530@N>;;1R^7sl!yB@p_=u_{U@&Y{>*<{_JqWnymoWFOXRv& zeqTYJvzg(;KB18WxI}LZ`jWtN-r9D-3!7`+Hj=TsKY6$959}|JRCu;4+AX}Xqho)o z1iclYk?}5~1mwI}&JQFkde{z$%!lhik&BqG((2F~x!2nH2n5236dpiS+N>Pl~1Xa@$)L>7V)C+D-MVhP~U8=;6L8abKjB^DWO^lydG?KA-3t zg`Ntq_|m5Lz3W?-t&n6UzIk3M?SeWFOnx2xEBs>1FN4OvTz?u_rs;}8ihq(w?~a4g zF5LPz;eCrvK60O7{2`uppD%~_k|QVfa6cyop7LV|(@s$%^4y2n8+q4X)C+Sw=;p7) zOD%s%xm-VYlXuH){Iw75E41tJx&2Y}R-Jh97vpJX8S!-`N59gp9OGYZ*)4wJIl5`Y zQ*Rh@+OOPC*jvBS4vwGNuk0^G`n9O+0ROk9f7;tm7d;%eiF}@T?(pj2 z`5RM9xpy!A5Pccw$pgQ(<*xU<@Z5esM10>Ec%$394oF`4bT~8n5yboJi08cQ$om$Z zw0-l0qZuE3)!NB0kY z@n|mZ+-G7^t~m6jfRo=j<;lA?TzIP_mwMp*faN03d63JSzdQPK8G5TgrY|7eaCotY z&mCFLXXouYd1B!BQAua?_k51I3iamRfJI;AHS5;|@aV&*es4?dGv0Jj^s(NF+<#xW z_>47+*75{($=$XCmbU61D9AC|9^JfEcqF3zLNB%Gu zk>lpd#iy;_Xrp{m9_k(Zt1Z|6{p>1V>Pw|Bi-_c(08hEX9V>r|iuYVJ$Mqxk9R}~Q_WO3(avrpMM{}+!dCBG3 zjeQ6DI|TXLqWL$v`H}k$EN2|@_g-{fWN-YKf&33AZ$D#i{8)ti$!i}vPVNEph1f5C zzXo5o{t5%BZv_1+>hMNi&wVB{UaVPU7UK)nwuXFD zf6eE=S?Ia{jLWZCUw$vgf>{0BKOnGPYZf4F?!_`VRMOnBR<>iQqcGAZ-08j zf8TlH|4RITu`mx_!o0+8j*~==m&}K5oEB`p%<|c=l6&_3jsGGGAV)Uu^IGuKjuFc_H`ohkyF1 z-@adr5dGyI`l*k|as88X%v}YO3s=8yxAnue+Z!*PG9|i&`orLxg*JbPf7pkK^ppE; zoU4BbdVXH`#Wg$UZhVvaN4o3pcn_n5`U|7HBfuIk20aBwpY;1U(v=)u?5E#}^pp9d zqxlmNVt)kvIrN70&$WN}(G`<^cIVMzzv!V~iS$Q&fqA)Agv=#+jI4Jhq30dn`To_# z%`bjONE6?m1s^@e_KR76e2!CmiJzE0&+$W7WxcmAwM@qcB50pf_whvi& zV0_cD&oF{?A|U&_To2KYb(F6NIr1WJ>~7k{`Y2Uj4sYB3#tw-$vdw!O?WQjmrbWVD zZRP)mE&nh4hrKyv@>ASD>5GACNx7OyK;0@dc!lcv)}x5KaQwE^3aPv1=mbB%Sn|z+1MwgFxYpoGdkczU@W-CMo2z0fQDEqSHgFJyf^ed?+eY$Gxs%6-Ge zbN&?lr}fvmqb{Dtw$Lj7gh|1(Z2zVIhakUU_R05f?4-QgZ*)4!2#Or*P21zj8Q*lQ zi%Q791{8UzC+<_wpIO8Q|7FWZUgX_=#_@CBzt2D6#clVWBJrlZ_}Tv%ro9ptyV&lD zz1sf>^3MS!y|jPM>u6WOiI?`DM40WL^;C1@r2SJ)^m^^zH+R*iju4+%6y9t9PFVaO zfu00-+9C414A(KAOrjl@fCKPz($Oz=#4yff9p32cdH<4iDA%Aee)0ZQMfx9{^}vi- z=PcVMwwd_meTQ}*yd(A??UsJP`%c(z{V?s?fh}%7(Bpaxaw}2?f4#FGbdKXm$afpZ z#cymEMA|tX+VXXdk7eX1@!iHp+8^j^)w|R~7-2mg#vM6n4>{;hf~TGIsbIJ9a8G^^ zy?N*xPp=*i$J5)`3%$|~I39*kzL^g%o9?y)J^sWeSpP-ux#;_y?VvRt(%&h_uit&w zje9d5GM(#JX)m;iI0n7rjdOX(HGpotiC(rpBI7lVU_2OaoQn6i+E=%6ivG(wa?%cq z2byR2_aku(oXF!`kI(Vdl&hMrxUz8ksk;cvezc8WgUSBRWvuUoXte6DCqBYIfAGW6Vh@;^3z^Q#}cPb5ry ze;qvKF28dMw_d$`sF%okUNCp{x`@q2^fdDs+{gMO`_E`>(&7hqGM@x^=5yopwI4_F z?(<>DQ%2CF?U)be9Jy}u;UMBmDu2<}ZM@l&ytE(Qw>iF3Ui9(mW@mI#tDQ)`d~QU4 zP)`za+y^7-O6Rs_FSi%(?w{e&#ku_@~yvk{MoNa1bE;_9LDb&} za1=NQJBNT-px7(pRRR6K> z5B=uPi0?~)XE~=X+xmr6^8D>gpGG|QCGtk>#@Euat(fLtCB-^fiE&KKXDh`Q|S!k^IDOeE!1r zK%V=itasr}{vGWtHpTjB2*~tdgwqZ$_VYKmi9GKP_V3|oQhRwup?BlX>sS2wYt!a4 z-v)U1xzC>bws_s}nt6*hnorQX`)zPPTfXmI`bPY+$<=^qt?r9I?9=kwv zNjbP5MSqj$K8NOcU(-CtU6(g@cdQqOU`HC51r~tJKZZLz~ zePq{PM#t;?o}K8MX7lgmm$&PWw<|C9d;Y_BG%RQKTQ}b$adLV7Q}M!!{{~<`{Z~Yo z{u@J>dL^CsuLhps&~)nu35)+Y&awRnFaBeg$adB1y+r04g?@&|L&;D4!tV_!|LX@o zQvPaU1Uwj9){2<|o6E?9u+fT3Zzuj`bU3sxv{KW6M z=%?26kBPxPm( zgv5vN-2&qeeWLzO>XP^Z(lP!A*M4a#=U5V7MtlYDgUky2@Z|}EE&VmbhYr!;I8&zJ5wu{U6d^|Cyisw%AtxNFRn=;M5hzwbeg(+6+JRaoxx;@23*>>a|Nc z;WOa#K+3beM;%`L&HJCox%JEYU9*0XZVXrhj#s}8m0#?g)?bpJDRalVCk=lk963`i zUmfF8(&0_|-9b@gE+Xw+yK&XU!z<5}a|7iZVNb@ihvs-xfS!Gi_~0GePfyMk0eNqh z>j<8Yz{PyP8J+a4GnKEjrlVahYi z?|2#3NO|fn&9wUIAIgs)AIj68F?_efZ~}6pN}lbR-&Zof2K-Y~^4xz;9Bu7k`W)m3 zj%;uLw6l(Lv>Db&`U@Cpa1o-9}p?d&3wMUdB=ZCz73qe5{JCV3D0wk zTwc=O`eV7?Xr@nNKP#)!Cvjei=DDs>ynhVo=^xnP9|d1)*YD3W{N7eQ8oT{z@B@k; z0zc^REq~OT<>C1(LtW*3QP}0<`Bo#2oaCQFSeGLOzUaue@^3Wr=ea;tM^5U4=U{1` z_A1^VI@}5+xh12U+H#K zg`C@drG6H8*RE!Nq2GfuTlFY@r++n1|0>=eM|w9uqsJcspKRCf4Zf_% z&^+zb<6^OgojLI3_I&*rgsTqk`j_k82IA>gqLf$UIZxocJPG;Wan^5Ip7S)W+Z$+y zMffv{bgUQlZ|w*6SIx7(D&9W^y}JF4g0Hpb>(4WMe5>8N{^2^D_OqNs?H{g72cT~d zsO7m1;<~*I|D<5gkg|vKDDInZypCc#$U5@UZ+V~7?Ys^-?H{)P!24Q$kbco@|LuJ9 zJaz5=IOLRmAIBFZ-yB~w&+$d^{$h9i{v7ynyPf_F!c~WN>zDfi4aBpah`N5cuR;G) zF8KbI-&*7A#3jtJKhP?Vw1YDE zu;Pp0ql(XgPbfYEKGn`Qf5%JLcOG)Coo@YcpJNnqtPi5DKkjpkDETqR9?{Qr2=`r* zXdhA7?;C9MPxJT0wf#eobM2RU=ej`2H}7ML_ZPbB@n^x8+U;qM`xV7E=g&RnkK9KI zoM6jGKN7V+xo=TNJ|UHk?Vsm3>iby+^2$HW`F{@a%$Ig>Kc=YiV?5<~AL4#b8g|B! zuI%WSdf|On`M)`yD&8MG(fUc-9|oTQ(hpqkXgwoc^tkPu`!RXQv7AJfmtpQVjCbGS zyq^0p)IW-RYVG#>*?x3+xh{!)u+=YI`?)_co;{praDQS5`qDs_kLBfiMBFb)!QKJL z7nD7`k8=Nv?V*8oP*L(nNk-=4`K=L*1A}Nsfe*Ep_oG(4`8#GYtgA}6??xPXY7D-Yniq_WTYV`!qq;Jy~~Q!EbbXEC?G#l}>N$pb8o&agOy o=VMvy=hU#DGwS$3-q)z$yYbvXc6}N6wk=2fI*VhDyj0Eq1CRq*CjbBd literal 0 HcmV?d00001 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean new file mode 100644 index 0000000..549155e --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean @@ -0,0 +1,427 @@ +import Std + +namespace CoreReader.Agency + +inductive Phase | formation | application | revision + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +structure PrincipleKey where + owner : Nat + localId : Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive Subject + | system (owner : Nat) + | principle (owner id : Nat) + | process (owner id : Nat) (phase : Phase) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def Subject.owner : Subject → Nat + | .system n => n + | .principle n _ => n + | .process n _ _ => n + +inductive Activity | generation | assessment + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive QuestionKind | conformity | formationBasis | applicability | revisionGrounds + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive SampleProgram | alwaysTrue | onlyAtZero + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def SampleProgram.run : SampleProgram → Nat → Bool + | .alwaysTrue, _ => true + | .onlyAtZero, n => n == 0 + +/- A generated candidate specifies both the inputs it tests and the scope it proposes to license. -/ +structure MethodDraft where + testedInputs : List Nat + claimedScope : List Nat + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def MethodDraft.accepts (draft : MethodDraft) (program : SampleProgram) : Bool := + draft.testedInputs.all program.run + +/- This finite application asks whether a proposed rule's observed inputs support its claimed input scope. -/ +structure Inquiry where + target : Subject + kind : QuestionKind + requestedScope : List Nat + currentMethod : MethodDraft + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive ReasonContent + | purpose (inputs : List Nat) + | declaredScope (inputs : List Nat) + | observation (input : Nat) (output : Bool) + | counterexample (program : SampleProgram) (input : Nat) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def ReasonContent.identifier : ReasonContent → Nat + | .purpose _ => 0 + | .declaredScope _ => 1 + | .observation _ _ => 2 + | .counterexample _ _ => 3 + +/- Reasons have independently supplied contents, a stable local reference and the actual target they concern. -/ +structure ReasonObject where + reference : Nat + target : Subject + content : ReasonContent + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive AssessmentResult | supportedWithinScope | insufficient | notApplicable | undetermined + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +inductive WorkOutcome + | assessment (result : AssessmentResult) + | generated (draft : MethodDraft) + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +/- A method's question, source reasons and limits are determined before looking at its activity records. +The meaning relation describes application of that method, not its universal adequacy. -/ +structure Principle where + key : PrincipleKey + activity : Activity + declaredMethod : MethodDraft + applicable : Subject → Prop + inquiry : Subject → Inquiry + reasons : Subject → List ReasonObject + limits : Subject → List Nat + meaning : Inquiry → List ReasonObject → List Nat → WorkOutcome → Prop + +structure WorkRecord where + usedPrinciple : PrincipleKey + target : Subject + activity : Activity + inquiry : Inquiry + reasons : List ReasonObject + limits : List Nat + outcome : WorkOutcome + deriving DecidableEq, Repr + +def RegistryCoherent (rules : List Principle) : Prop := + ∀ p ∈ rules, ∀ q ∈ rules, p.key = q.key → p = q + +def TargetResolved (rules : List Principle) : Subject → Prop + | .system owner => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key.owner = owner + | .principle owner id | .process owner id _ => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,id⟩ + +/- The inquiry names the registered target's declared method contract, not an unrelated candidate. +For a system inquiry this finite model uses the registered generation contract as its assessed artifact. -/ +def TargetContentResolved (rules : List Principle) (question : Inquiry) : Prop := + match question.target with + | .system owner => ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,0⟩ ∧ question.currentMethod = p.declaredMethod + | .principle owner id | .process owner id _ => + ∃ p ∈ rules, p.key = ⟨owner,id⟩ ∧ question.currentMethod = p.declaredMethod + +def Performed (records : List WorkRecord) (s : Subject) (a : Activity) : Prop := + ∃ record ∈ records, record.target = s ∧ record.activity = a + +/- The old scope condition remains available without conflating scope with content completion. -/ +def ReflexiveScope (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : Prop := + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → rule.applicable s → Performed records s rule.activity + +/- A record uses a registered principle on the same resolvable target, question, reasons and limits, +and its result must actually follow that principle's method. A negative result can satisfy this relation. -/ +structure ValidApplication (rules : List Principle) (rule : Principle) (s : Subject) + (record : WorkRecord) : Prop where + registered : rule ∈ rules + applicable : rule.applicable s + usedIdentity : record.usedPrinciple = rule.key + targetIdentity : record.target = s + targetResolved : TargetResolved rules s + activityIdentity : record.activity = rule.activity + inquiryIdentity : record.inquiry = rule.inquiry s + inquiryTarget : record.inquiry.target = s + targetContent : TargetContentResolved rules record.inquiry + reasonsIdentity : record.reasons = rule.reasons s + reasonsNonempty : record.reasons ≠ [] + reasonTargets : ∀ reason ∈ record.reasons, reason.target = s + limitsIdentity : record.limits = rule.limits s + followsMeaning : rule.meaning record.inquiry record.reasons record.limits record.outcome + +/- The registered normative interface requires contentful application, not just activity labels. -/ +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive +organon.charter.reflexivity#p1 sha256 13293b45c2fa89068c68ae7ef3c5df38f0efadb3ef3873d78a5ba67d9691a757 +organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1 sha256 8a2caede01a43d8b6c60b54c78ac089c51868e9956f316948077ccee2e45c9cc +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +def Reflexive (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : Prop := + RegistryCoherent rules ∧ + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → rule.applicable s → + ∃ record ∈ records, ValidApplication rules rule s record + +theorem Reflexive.toScope {owner : Nat} {rules : List Principle} {records : List WorkRecord} + (h : Reflexive owner rules records) : ReflexiveScope owner rules records := by + intro rule hr s hs ha + obtain ⟨record, hm, hv⟩ := h.2 rule hr s hs ha + exact ⟨record, hm, hv.targetIdentity, hv.activityIdentity⟩ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem noSelfExemption (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) + (h : Reflexive owner rules records) (rule : Principle) (hr : rule ∈ rules) + (s : Subject) (hs : s.owner = owner) (ha : rule.applicable s) : + Performed records s rule.activity := h.toScope rule hr s hs ha + +def localMethod : MethodDraft := ⟨[0],[0]⟩ + +def inquiryFor (s : Subject) : Inquiry := + match s with + | .process _ _ .formation => ⟨s, .formationBasis, [0], localMethod⟩ + | .process _ _ .application => ⟨s, .applicability, [0], localMethod⟩ + | .process _ _ .revision => ⟨s, .revisionGrounds, [0,1], localMethod⟩ + | _ => ⟨s, .conformity, [0], localMethod⟩ + +/- These original inquiry inputs do not depend on which work records happen to be present. -/ +def sourceReasonContents : QuestionKind → List ReasonContent + | .formationBasis => [.purpose [0], .declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true] + | .applicability | .conformity => [.declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true] + | .revisionGrounds => [.purpose [0,1], .declaredScope [0], .observation 0 true, + .counterexample .onlyAtZero 1] + +def reasonsFor (s : Subject) : List ReasonObject := + (sourceReasonContents (inquiryFor s).kind).map fun content => ⟨content.identifier,s,content⟩ + +/- The application-specific evaluator examines actual scope and sample/counterexample contents. +It is a finite inferential method, not a universal standard for empirical or value claims. -/ +def assessInquiry (question : Inquiry) (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) : AssessmentResult := + let contents := reasons.map ReasonObject.content + if limits ≠ question.currentMethod.claimedScope then .undetermined else + match question.kind with + | .formationBasis => + if ReasonContent.purpose question.requestedScope ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ question.requestedScope = limits + then .supportedWithinScope else .undetermined + | .applicability | .conformity => + if question.requestedScope.all (fun n => limits.contains n) then + if ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.observation 0 true ∈ contents ∧ question.requestedScope = [0] + then .supportedWithinScope else .undetermined + else .notApplicable + | .revisionGrounds => + if ReasonContent.purpose question.requestedScope ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.declaredScope limits ∈ contents ∧ + ReasonContent.observation 0 true ∈ contents ∧ + contents.any (fun reason => match reason with + | .counterexample program input => question.requestedScope.contains input && + question.currentMethod.accepts program && + !(program.run input) + | _ => false) + then .insufficient else .undetermined + +def finiteMethodResult (activity : Activity) (question : Inquiry) + (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) : WorkOutcome := + match activity with + | .generation => .generated ⟨question.currentMethod.testedInputs,question.requestedScope⟩ + | .assessment => .assessment (assessInquiry question reasons limits) + +def finiteMethodMeaning (activity : Activity) (question : Inquiry) + (reasons : List ReasonObject) (limits : List Nat) (outcome : WorkOutcome) : Prop := + outcome = finiteMethodResult activity question reasons limits + +def ownSubjects (owner : Nat) : List Subject := + [.system owner, .principle owner 0, .principle owner 1, + .process owner 0 .formation, .process owner 0 .application, .process owner 0 .revision, + .process owner 1 .formation, .process owner 1 .application, .process owner 1 .revision] + +/- Applying an existing rule is not a generation event in this application. -/ +def generationEligible : Subject → Bool + | .process _ _ .application => false + | _ => true + +def generatingRule (owner : Nat) : Principle where + key := ⟨owner,0⟩ + activity := .generation + declaredMethod := localMethod + applicable s := s ∈ ownSubjects owner ∧ generationEligible s = true + inquiry := inquiryFor + reasons := reasonsFor + limits _ := [0] + meaning := finiteMethodMeaning .generation + +def assessingRule (owner : Nat) : Principle where + key := ⟨owner,1⟩ + activity := .assessment + declaredMethod := localMethod + applicable s := s ∈ ownSubjects owner + inquiry := inquiryFor + reasons := reasonsFor + limits _ := [0] + meaning := finiteMethodMeaning .assessment + +def ownRules (owner : Nat) : List Principle := [generatingRule owner, assessingRule owner] + +/- Recorded verdicts are stated separately from the evaluator, so agreement has to be proved. -/ +def statedOutcome (activity : Activity) (s : Subject) : WorkOutcome := + match activity with + | .generation => .generated ⟨(inquiryFor s).currentMethod.testedInputs,(inquiryFor s).requestedScope⟩ + | .assessment => .assessment (match (inquiryFor s).kind with + | .revisionGrounds => .insufficient + | _ => .supportedWithinScope) + +def recordFor (rule : Principle) (s : Subject) : WorkRecord := + ⟨rule.key,s,rule.activity,rule.inquiry s,rule.reasons s,rule.limits s,statedOutcome rule.activity s⟩ + +theorem reasonsFor_nonempty (s : Subject) : reasonsFor s ≠ [] := by + cases s with + | system owner => simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + | principle owner id => simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> simp [reasonsFor, inquiryFor, sourceReasonContents] + +theorem reasonsFor_target (s : Subject) : ∀ reason ∈ reasonsFor s, reason.target = s := by + intro reason h + obtain ⟨content, _, rfl⟩ := List.mem_map.mp h + rfl + +theorem inquiryFor_target (s : Subject) : (inquiryFor s).target = s := by + cases s with + | system owner => rfl + | principle owner id => rfl + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> rfl + +/- This proof includes the actual negative revision evaluation for both principle identities. -/ +theorem ownContentEvaluates (activity : Activity) (s : Subject) : + statedOutcome activity s = finiteMethodResult activity (inquiryFor s) (reasonsFor s) [0] := by + cases activity with + | generation => rfl + | assessment => + cases s with + | system owner => rfl + | principle owner id => rfl + | process owner id phase => cases phase <;> rfl + +theorem ownRegistryCoherent (owner : Nat) : RegistryCoherent (ownRules owner) := by + intro p hp q hq hkey + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hp hq + rcases hp with rfl | rfl <;> rcases hq with rfl | rfl + · rfl + · have bad := congrArg PrincipleKey.localId hkey; contradiction + · have bad := congrArg PrincipleKey.localId hkey; contradiction + · rfl + +theorem ownTargetResolved (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + TargetResolved (ownRules owner) s := by + simp only [ownSubjects, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hs + rcases hs with rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl <;> + simp [TargetResolved, ownRules, generatingRule, assessingRule] + +theorem ownTargetContent (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + TargetContentResolved (ownRules owner) (inquiryFor s) := by + simp only [ownSubjects, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hs + rcases hs with rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl | rfl <;> + simp [TargetContentResolved, inquiryFor, ownRules, generatingRule, assessingRule] + +theorem ownRecordValid (owner : Nat) (rule : Principle) (hr : rule ∈ ownRules owner) + (s : Subject) (ha : rule.applicable s) : + ValidApplication (ownRules owner) rule s (recordFor rule s) := by + have hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl + · exact ha.1 + · exact ha + have hq : rule.inquiry = inquiryFor := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hg : rule.reasons = reasonsFor := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hl : rule.limits s = [0] := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + have hm : rule.meaning = finiteMethodMeaning rule.activity := by + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl <;> rfl + refine ⟨hr, ha, rfl, rfl, ownTargetResolved owner s hs, rfl, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_⟩ + · change (rule.inquiry s).target = s + rw [hq]; exact inquiryFor_target s + · change TargetContentResolved (ownRules owner) (rule.inquiry s) + rw [hq]; exact ownTargetContent owner s hs + · change rule.reasons s ≠ [] + rw [hg]; exact reasonsFor_nonempty s + · change ∀ reason ∈ rule.reasons s, reason.target = s + rw [hg]; exact reasonsFor_target s + · change rule.meaning (rule.inquiry s) (rule.reasons s) (rule.limits s) (statedOutcome rule.activity s) + rw [hm, hq, hg, hl] + exact ownContentEvaluates rule.activity s + +def completeOwnWork (owner : Nat) : List WorkRecord := + (ownSubjects owner).flatMap fun s => + if generationEligible s then [recordFor (generatingRule owner) s, recordFor (assessingRule owner) s] + else [recordFor (assessingRule owner) s] + +theorem assessingRecord_member (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + recordFor (assessingRule owner) s ∈ completeOwnWork owner := by + apply List.mem_flatMap.mpr + refine ⟨s,hs,?_⟩ + cases generationEligible s <;> simp + +theorem generatingRecord_member (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) + (hg : generationEligible s = true) : recordFor (generatingRule owner) s ∈ completeOwnWork owner := by + exact List.mem_flatMap.mpr ⟨s,hs,by simp [hg]⟩ + +theorem completeOwnWork_reflexive (owner : Nat) : + Reflexive owner (ownRules owner) (completeOwnWork owner) := by + refine ⟨ownRegistryCoherent owner, ?_⟩ + intro rule hr s _ ha + refine ⟨recordFor rule s, ?_, ownRecordValid owner rule hr s ha⟩ + simp only [ownRules, List.mem_cons, List.not_mem_nil, or_false] at hr + rcases hr with rfl | rfl + · exact generatingRecord_member owner s ha.1 ha.2 + · exact assessingRecord_member owner s ha + +theorem ownAssessmentPerformed (owner : Nat) (s : Subject) (hs : s ∈ ownSubjects owner) : + Performed (completeOwnWork owner) s .assessment := + ⟨recordFor (assessingRule owner) s, assessingRecord_member owner s hs, rfl, rfl⟩ + +def applicationRule : Principle := + { assessingRule 0 with key := ⟨0,0⟩, applicable := fun s => s = .process 0 0 .application } + +def applicationWork : List WorkRecord := [recordFor applicationRule (.process 0 0 .application)] + +theorem applicationWork_reflexive : Reflexive 0 [applicationRule] applicationWork := by + constructor + · intro p hp q hq _ + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hp hq + rw [hp,hq] + · intro rule hr s _ ha + simp only [List.mem_singleton] at hr + subst rule + change s = .process 0 0 .application at ha + subst s + refine ⟨recordFor applicationRule (.process 0 0 .application), by simp [applicationWork], ?_⟩ + refine ⟨by simp, rfl, rfl, rfl, ?_, rfl, rfl, rfl, ?_, rfl, ?_, ?_, rfl, ?_⟩ + · exact ⟨applicationRule, by simp, rfl⟩ + · exact ⟨applicationRule, by simp, rfl, rfl⟩ + · exact reasonsFor_nonempty _ + · exact reasonsFor_target _ + · change statedOutcome .assessment (.process 0 0 .application) = finiteMethodResult .assessment (inquiryFor (.process 0 0 .application)) (reasonsFor (.process 0 0 .application)) [0] + exact ownContentEvaluates .assessment _ + +/-- organon-map CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained +organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1 sha256 ac0baae0d86e69f84c1ca4dee837de2759e2d29c295ffc257d988962158d4bbc +-/ +theorem applicabilityRetained (owner : Nat) (rules : List Principle) (records : List WorkRecord) : + (Reflexive owner rules records → ReflexiveScope owner rules records) ∧ + (ReflexiveScope owner rules records ↔ + ∀ rule ∈ rules, ∀ s, s.owner = owner → (¬ rule.applicable s ∨ Performed records s rule.activity)) ∧ + (Reflexive 0 [applicationRule] applicationWork ∧ + ¬ Performed applicationWork (.system 0) .assessment) := by + classical + refine ⟨Reflexive.toScope, ?_, applicationWork_reflexive, ?_⟩ + · constructor + · intro h rule hr s hs + by_cases ha : rule.applicable s + · exact Or.inr (h rule hr s hs ha) + · exact Or.inl ha + · intro h rule hr s hs ha + exact (h rule hr s hs).resolve_left (not_not_intro ha) + · rintro ⟨record, hm, ht, _⟩ + simp only [applicationWork, List.mem_singleton] at hm + subst record + cases ht + +end CoreReader.Agency diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml b/lean/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml similarity index 79% rename from lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml rename to lean/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml index c5190a2..a9f2c99 100644 --- a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml +++ b/lean/philosophy/leanified/lakefile.toml @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -name = "CoreReader" +name = "core_reproof" version = "0.0.1" defaultTargets = ["CoreReader"] [[lean_lib]] diff --git a/lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain b/lean/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain similarity index 100% rename from lean/core-v0.1.3/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain rename to lean/philosophy/leanified/lean-toolchain diff --git a/lean/philosophy/manuscript.json b/lean/philosophy/manuscript.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..9c40cad --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/manuscript.json @@ -0,0 +1,653 @@ +{ + "schema_version": 1, + "repository_root": "../..", + "source_current": { + "path": "../../PHILOSOPHY.md", + "sha256": "226fa3522943955d5a0f1f0b88e883c97b3505b3bcfd285329e432757912543f" + }, + "proof_targets": { + "path": "targets.json", + "sha256": "2400383120ab2d98454597a73cdcaaadf45b8e47b18a646118708dc5d81da2a4" + }, + "code_files": [ + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Agency.lean", + "sha256": "b0dca4187a88a0a0f33c3dd6a11bb383907603ef514e80e9e3f09f95ce9633e2" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Choice.lean", + "sha256": "07cf17f73802bdd34ae00ecba317ddc0283321cce00f15a84b69df421c3fe25f" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Evidence.lean", + "sha256": "18beb2b94450fdab36229b645e2df129348f3e67306104e842e0dce6e72443e8" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Integration.lean", + "sha256": "b5ba8617e06f03963c4284344fbe3c662188f1b88542c55cc15beb1cd5f99c03" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Logic.lean", + "sha256": "6b70be8964763b6447a2603bde665ff58106678f2e1d421bebd8c6b29ae46e04" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean", + "sha256": "25292faa71c5585a8f50cb07d72c2f44fa12dcfb125b2b92094f9306fecb4fd0" + }, + { + "path": "leanified/CoreReader.lean", + "sha256": "80eee78ec3453fefdb26d3dbce97f0447d4b9ffeb4683604dad0c03902a1bfdd" + } + ], + "review": { + "path": "reviews/fidelity.json", + "sha256": "d6c6c7414736e26558ddfe620f1b3db45743f45b967c36b348aecf991bc15779" + }, + "views": { + "overview_en": { + "path": "overview.md", + "sha256": "9fbeb16d59c36789b578cd3df1f5e88559c82b243801c83d84df0855997866d7" + }, + "details_en": { + "path": "details.md", + "sha256": "b84342748d5cc5df26db610d7ab53cf8e553922f1847091be9b49d9bbbfb004a" + }, + "overview_zh": { + "path": "../../zh/lean/philosophy/overview.md", + "sha256": "4ff68caa6bb800d5a7adfce0538bb01b3a4c95afa3be78ce25167c8739c6b26b" + }, + "details_zh": { + "path": "../../zh/lean/philosophy/details.md", + "sha256": "1810b4d6800f4dd98699bf17db168718f22a0e3146ad7ecc90810c65cb4f84fe" + } + }, + "entries": [ + { + "id": "organon.preamble.p1", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This declares textual authority and adopted-commitment scope, not a mathematical proposition about all systems. The review retains this boundary without manufacturing a Lean theorem of authority.", + "context_only": true + }, + { + "id": "organon.preamble.p2", + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](rationale/README.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The shared model exhibits compatible constraints without a chapter-priority inference. Authority of meanings and limits, the role of Rationale and revisability of actual skills remain textual commitments outside this finite witness." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter", + "unit": "organon.charter", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity**", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a structural list of three headings. It organizes substantive provisions and requires no fabricated theorem." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p2", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "jointWitness combines valued expansion, revisability, contextual consistency and contentful owned principle work in one inhabited system. It proves model satisfiability, not actual compliance by arbitrary systems." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview.p3", + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The three requirements remain distinct predicates with a shared example and specific nonentailments. Their interpretation as philosophical obligations and their full conditions in arbitrary applications are not derived from the example." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "Generative specifies valuation and revisability of current forms. The finite tags and state examples do not characterize every form of understanding, construction or intrinsic orientation." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The neutral-policy counterexample separates permission for distinct versions from the adopted valuation predicate. It does not establish what every real system values or justify the adopted value universally." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "All five represented form kinds, including organization, method and principle, fall under conditional revisability; a constant trace shows no progress guarantee. The chosen representation is not an exhaustive ontology or an executed revision." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits", + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The same before/after states increase inventory, abstraction and vocabulary without adding represented capabilities. Actual performance records can distinguish a genuine extension in a two-case world; empirical reliability beyond that world is not proved." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits.p2", + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously.\n- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement.\n- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation.\n- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits", + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Bound execution exhibits separate external dependencies, grounded stability, a nonimproving trace and a refuted owned announcement. These are finite compatibility and failure examples; philosophical adoption and real autonomous development remain outside their conclusions." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency", + "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The general semantic theorem prevents opposite consequences under one theory/context when an admissible world exists. Existence of such a world, choice of questions and interpretation of held judgments are explicit modeling conditions, not guaranteed for reality." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences", + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Concrete retraction slices can reverse judgments, and a conditional reporting specification disallows concealing recognized change. No automatic detector, adequate report generator or real revision history is established." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning.p2", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences", + "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Separate assumption, meaning and scope changes admit different judgments; hidden changes fail the adopted report condition. This covers explicit semantic models, not every practical ambiguity or method of concealment." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions.\n- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction", + "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Finite witnesses distinguish tension from contradiction and consistency from truth or completeness. Refusing to retain a demonstrated conflict is a conditional consequence of an adopted consistency requirement, not an implemented revision strategy." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "Reflexive quantifies applicable owned rules and subjects, with coherent keys and meaningful application records. The concrete rule set has generation and assessment work but does not cover every possible real principle." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "incomplete", + "reason": "The revised module models formation purposes, requested applicability scopes and revision counterexamples with actual evaluation and generation outcomes. These finite inquiry contracts do not establish the correctness or completeness of every assessment methodology." + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability.\n- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness.\n- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive", + "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption", + "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained", + "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Applicability is retained, self-exemption fails where conditions hold, and finite self-tests plus a produced revision fail to establish universal support. The owned records and source identities are mathematical objects, not authenticated execution histories." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Grounds checks identified applicable facets of the same claim; support, entailment and an option-indexed value procedure carry distinct responsibilities. This is a chosen formal interface and finite fulfillment examples, not a universal sufficient criterion for all philosophical grounds." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Articulation content is linked to each facet and separated from its discharge; union and missing-aspect examples prevent labels from waiving represented duties. Identifying every actually relevant aspect remains an application responsibility not solved by the datatype." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility |\n| --- | --- | --- |\n| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. |\n| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. |\n| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. |", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The three modeled adapters check observational compatibility/support, semantic entailment, and value reasons with limits/consequences/criticism. Actual relevance, empirical uncertainty and the adequacy of value criticism beyond the chosen cases are not exhaustively formalized." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment.p3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "JointAdoption requires consistent instantiated starting commitments without proving all starting assumptions. A two-reason example and heterogeneous facets avoid a universal numerical scale. They demonstrate procedural consistency, not ultimate value justification." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference", + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A proper local observation scope supports a local function claim while admitting a counterexample outside it. This establishes the specified nonentailment; it neither identifies all relevant real differences nor rules out justified wider evidence." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference", + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Repeated irrelevant measurements fail support, while a valid inferential assessment needs no empirical chain. This refutes a universal mandatory chain within the represented responsibilities but does not characterize every framework or measurement practice." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope.p3", + "unit": "organon.grounds.scope", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.localNotUniversal", + "CoreReader.Evidence.hiddenDifference", + "CoreReader.Evidence.singleObservation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.noUniversalChain", + "CoreReader.Evidence.variableOutcomesStableBound", + "CoreReader.Evidence.verificationReproductionStability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A single observation has limited support and distinct trial outcomes preserve a fixed bound. Verification, reproducible conditions and conclusion stability use separate predicates; no probability distribution or general reproducibility law is proved." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer", + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment", + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Output-only and explanation-bearing contracts concern the same process and each has its own checked Grounds; applicationVariation changes the actual objective and invalidates old evidence. No uniform real mastery or capability-level definition is derived." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "CoreReader.Evidence.outputNotExplanation", + "CoreReader.Evidence.applicationContractsDiffer", + "CoreReader.Evidence.externalAssessment", + "CoreReader.Agency.inventoryNotCapability" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "A distinct assessor role supplies a proof about the exact output process while no explanation certificate is attached; duplicating four inventory kinds leaves represented capability unchanged. Role numbers and certificates do not prove external provenance or human-like understanding." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails", + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "The adopted choice interface requires feasibility and an objective/value/constraint-linked reason and rejects status-only reasons. Its finite reason vocabulary and concrete feasibility checks do not supply a general theory of warranted real implementation choice." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.p2", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.statusOnlyFails", + "CoreReader.Choice.conventionWithReason", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Two independent policies share a correct negative audit but differ on the added choice norm, establishing independence from the represented assessment procedure. This does not show an unsupported priority claim fully satisfies general Grounds, or derive a value commitment from neutral facts." + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits.p1", + "unit": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective.\n- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation.\n- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds.\n- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Choice.singleFeasible", + "CoreReader.Choice.localNotGlobal", + "CoreReader.Choice.internalReasons", + "CoreReader.Choice.openNotEquivalent" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Concrete cases have one feasible candidate, unequal implementations, local agreement with wider difference and four eligible internal reasons. A cheap wrong-output method shows eligibility alone is insufficient. These results concern selected candidates and contracts, not all methods." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships", + "unit": "organon.relationships", + "clause": null, + "excerpt": "\n", + "declarations": [], + "kernel": "not_checked", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "status": "not_applicable", + "reason": "Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice", + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "One shared model combines the charter and Grounds and assigns five commitments distinct operational reasons, limits and live criticism. Specified nonentailments prevent chapter order from doing logical work; neither the universal adoption nor ultimate justification of all commitments follows." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p2", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p2", + "excerpt": "Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice", + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Consistency/support and orientation/capability remain separate; changing an application objective changes its actual claim and can defeat retained evidence. Universal application compliance is only an assumed conditional interface, not an achieved fact." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles.p3", + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p3", + "excerpt": "Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application.", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice", + "CoreReader.Integration.revisionKeepsConsistency", + "CoreReader.Integration.ownCapabilityGrounded", + "CoreReader.Integration.groundsSelfAssessment", + "CoreReader.Integration.existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged", + "CoreReader.Agency.generationNotReflexivity", + "CoreReader.Integration.charterNotGrounds", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationRetainsDuties", + "CoreReader.Integration.reasonsBelongToCommitments", + "CoreReader.Integration.applicationVariation" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "Contentful self-application, exact own-capability assessment, the general Grounds provision and the same current philosophy method are linked in the model. Their checked coexistence supplies no self-proof, real execution guarantee or unconditional applicability." + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.terms.p1", + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "p1", + "excerpt": "| Term | Meaning in this philosophy |\n| --- | --- |\n| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. |\n| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. |", + "declarations": [ + "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress", + "CoreReader.Evidence.nonExecutableAssessment" + ], + "kernel": "passed", + "fidelity": "partial", + "status": "limited", + "reason": "FormKind includes organization, methods and principles, and an inferential assessment has no executable-test requirement. These representations illustrate the terms without exhaustively defining every existing form or every non-test assessment." + } + ] +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/overview.md b/lean/philosophy/overview.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..a53a9d6 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/overview.md @@ -0,0 +1,1158 @@ +# Philosophy and Lean: claim overview + +This reader follows 28 frozen targets. Target acceptance, Lean checking and source fidelity are separate judgments. Defining a duty does not establish its fulfillment; a finite model does not establish universal real-world correctness. The tracing appendix retains all 33 source paragraphs and two empty headings. + +`accepted` records acceptance of a target within its stated scope; `limited` retains a bounded formal correspondence for a source paragraph; `incomplete` retains material without a complete source proof. Lean `passed` reports checking of registered declarations; checking a normative interface is not fulfillment of its duty. + +[Other granularity](details.md) · [Frozen targets](targets.json) · [Review and exposure record](reviews/README.md) · [Actual declaration types](evidence/declaration-types.json) + +| Target | Claim | Kind | Target review | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | +| [T01](#t01) | Authority and boundaries | boundary | accepted | +| [T02](#t02) | A shared nonempty model | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T03](#t03) | Generative commitment | specification | accepted | +| [T04](#t04) | Permission does not supply valuation | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T05](#t05) | Revisability and progress | theorem | accepted | +| [T06](#t06) | Generation has limits | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T07](#t07) | Achievement needs matching grounds | theorem | accepted | +| [T08](#t08) | Whole-theory consistency | theorem | accepted | +| [T09](#t09) | Revision and context changes | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T10](#t10) | Changes must be acknowledged | theorem | accepted | +| [T11](#t11) | Tension and contradiction | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T12](#t12) | Consistency is not truth or coverage | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T13](#t13) | Reflexive work with actual inquiry and reasons | specification | accepted | +| [T14](#t14) | Self-application is not self-proof | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T15](#t15) | Support, strength and scope | theorem | accepted | +| [T16](#t16) | All applicable aspects retain duties | theorem | accepted | +| [T17](#t17) | Articulation, repetition and assertion are insufficient | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T18](#t18) | Adopted value positions and joint reasons | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T19](#t19) | Local evidence and omitted differences | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T20](#t20) | Observation, reproduction and stability | satisfiability | accepted | +| [T21](#t21) | Capability contracts and external assessment | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T22](#t22) | Relevant implementation reasons | theorem | accepted | +| [T23](#t23) | An accurate assessment does not enforce the extra choice norm | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T24](#t24) | Openness does not imply equivalence or plurality | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T25](#t25) | Mutual application in one system | theorem | accepted | +| [T26](#t26) | Distinct commitments and their combination | nonentailment | accepted | +| [T27](#t27) | Application duties and individual reasons | theorem | accepted | +| [T28](#t28) | Assessment without observation tests | satisfiability | accepted | + + +## T01 · Authority and boundaries + +The adopted English source, including its meanings, applicability and limits, remains the authority against which this formalization is compared. + +**Premises and representation:** This entry records the selected source and documentary boundary; it has no required Lean declaration. + +**Proof or check:** The target catalog records the source units and their boundary status. There is no mathematical derivation of the authority or adoption of the philosophy. + +**Limits:** Source correspondence and acceptance of a philosophical position are separate from kernel checking. Neither the catalog nor the proofs establish universal philosophical correctness. + +**State:** accepted (boundary). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.preamble#p1](#source-organon-preamble-p1), [organon.preamble#p2](#source-organon-preamble-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p1](#source-organon-charter-overview-p1), [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t01) + + + +## T02 · A shared nonempty model + +One explicitly inhabited System and World jointly carry the charter, its own supported output capability, relevant implementation choice, and grounds for each of five represented commitments. + +**Premises and representation:** The witness is actualSystem at actual = (identity, apply). The world type independently varies two implementations and two governance modes. Its context includes the system theory, observation assumptions and application scope; the contracts and assessment adapters are explicit model choices. + +**Proof or check:** jointWitness supplies that same pair throughout, using actualAdmissible, charterChecked, ownCapabilityGrounded, identityJustified and reasonsBelongToCommitments. The existential conclusion also identifies the witnesses by equality. + +**Limits:** This proves coexistence in the disclosed application model, not correctness of every possible system or independent validation of the adopted normative criteria. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.preamble#p1](#source-organon-preamble-p1), [organon.preamble#p2](#source-organon-preamble-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t02) + + + +## T03 · Generative commitment + +Generative is defined as valuing expanded understanding and construction, together with revisability of every form that the policy treats as current. + +**Premises and representation:** The parameter is a Policy with worthPursuing, current and revisable predicates. The revisability clause applies to forms satisfying current; permitsVersion is a separate field. + +**Proof or check:** The declaration is a conjunction defining an obligation. Later concrete policies instantiate it; the definition itself is not a theorem that any agent satisfies it. + +**Limits:** The representation does not establish that the valued aim is ultimately good, that every permitted edit advances it, or that a current form must be changed immediately. + +**State:** accepted (specification). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.overview#p2](#source-organon-charter-overview-p2), [organon.charter.overview#p3](#source-organon-charter-overview-p3), [organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-orientation-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-non-finality-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t03) + + + +## T04 · Permission does not supply valuation + +Permission to change a version can hold while the generative valuation is absent. + +**Premises and representation:** The concrete neutral policy permits versions but assigns no worth to the expansion aim; Generative retains its valuation conjunct. + +**Proof or check:** permissionNotValuation evaluates the permission and unfolds Generative to refute its missing valuation clause. + +**Limits:** This is a counterexample to an implication between represented predicates; it does not justify either policy or classify all real permissions. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-orientation-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t04) + + + +## T05 · Revisability and progress + +Generative policies leave current forms revisable, while the concrete open policy can remain generative through a trace with no capability expansion. + +**Premises and representation:** The general revisability result assumes Generative and that the selected form is current. The example covers organization, method, principle, appearance and artifact, and uses a constant base-state trace. + +**Proof or check:** revisabilityCovers projects the revisability obligation. revisionWithoutProgress instantiates the open policy and shows that adjacent identical states contain no newly understood or constructed operation. + +**Limits:** Revisability and permission are not evidence that revision occurred or improved capability. The result is not a universal claim that revision never yields progress. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-non-finality-p1), [organon.relationships.terms#p1](#source-organon-relationships-terms-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t05) + + + +## T06 · Generation has limits + +One generating system illustrates non-progressing inflation, dependence on three external resources, a justified stable action within its application budget, and a false expansion report about its own actual transition. + +**Premises and representation:** The system combines openPolicy, baseState, assistedExecution, required copy capability and an inventory budget of 1. inflatedState duplicates artifacts, abstraction layers and vocabulary without adding understood or constructed operations. Its report names this owner, before/after states and successor at input 0 with expected output 1. + +**Proof or check:** generationLimits evaluates the same system interface: available resources yield 6, deleting any of experience/knowledge/collaborator or all three yields none; the stable action preserves the current state, required capability and budget. Inflation exceeds that budget, and the system-generated report fails because its claimed new operation is absent. + +**Limits:** The resource dependence and budget are declared application conditions. These content-bearing examples do not establish universal laws of learning, mandatory austerity, or the adequacy of any real expansion report. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t06) + + + +## T07 · Achievement needs matching grounds + +AchievementAccountability requires Grounds for the very achievement claim. Given support and an actual evidence-compatible world, that claim holds there; a concrete expansion case has matching grounds, while its positive self-report alone does not support it. + +**Premises and representation:** The general theorem takes a world type, achievement predicate, records, actual world, Compatible records actual and Supports records achievement. Separately, the concrete alternatives share baseState and input 0: extend adds successor, whereas inflate only duplicates content. + +**Proof or check:** achievementNeedsSupport applies support to the compatible actual world and includes ConcreteAchievementExample. Actual after-state performance distinguishes extend and supplies canonical matched grounds; the positive report is also compatible with inflate, where Expanded before after is false. + +**Limits:** The definition expresses normative accountability without making observation universally mandatory. The theorem assumes support in its general branch and does not infer it from an arbitrary assertion or prove real achievement from record labels. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p1), [organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2](#source-organon-charter-self-transcendence-limits-p2), [organon.grounds#p1](#source-organon-grounds-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p1](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p2](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t07) + + + +## T08 · Whole-theory consistency + +An inhabited common theory and context cannot semantically yield both answers to one question. Separately satisfiable assumptions may nevertheless become inconsistent when held together. + +**Premises and representation:** consequenceConsistency quantifies over world and question types, a held theory and one Context, and assumes an Admissible world satisfying the entire held theory, contextual assumptions and scope simultaneously. + +**Proof or check:** The general proof evaluates both consequences at the same witness to obtain a contradiction. jointConflict combines P, P implies Q, and not Q: each singleton has a model, but their union has none. + +**Limits:** The nonempty witness is essential to this semantic consistency argument. Pairwise or isolated checks do not establish joint satisfiability, and no empirical truth of the assumptions is inferred. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t08) + + + +## T09 · Revision and context changes + +Different time-indexed theories can give opposite answers without either being unsatisfiable; changing assumptions, question meaning or scope can likewise change the answer. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples fix explicit Boolean interpretations and separately inhabited contexts. The positive and negative answers belong to different theory slices or contexts, not one unchanged conjunction. + +**Proof or check:** revisionCanReverse constructs the two slices and shows their simultaneous union fails. contextDifferences separately changes the assumptions, meaning and scope components while evaluating the corresponding consequences. + +**Limits:** These examples distinguish revision and contextual difference from simultaneous contradiction. They do not establish that a particular revision is warranted, truthful or progressive. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t09) + + + +## T10 · Changes must be acknowledged + +Under TruthfulReport, a semantic change or a different revision identity requires a positive change report. Reordering the same held content does not change that content, and honest reporting does not make revised assumptions true. + +**Premises and representation:** The general result assumes two snapshots, a report flag, the TruthfulReport obligation and an actual semantic-or-identity change. SameContent compares held claims, contextual assumptions, meaning and scope extensionally. + +**Proof or check:** semanticChangeMustBeReported applies the assumed reporting obligation; representationOrderIrrelevant proves union commutativity. hiddenContextChangeRejected evaluates separate hidden assumption, meaning, scope and identity changes, and an acknowledged revision false at the designated actual world. + +**Limits:** The reporting rule is adopted, not derived from logic alone. The cases do not decide every possible form of revision or certify the quality of an acknowledged change. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2](#source-organon-charter-consistency-meaning-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t10) + + + +## T11 · Tension and contradiction + +Distinct resource objectives can be jointly satisfiable. In contrast, positive and negative consequences for the same question in the same theory and context violate Consistent. + +**Premises and representation:** The tension example uses the predicates 4 ≤ budget and budget ≤ 6. conflictRequiresChange takes an arbitrary theory, context and question together with both opposed consequences. + +**Proof or check:** tensionWithoutContradiction supplies budget 5 and proves the predicates are different. conflictRequiresChange applies the definition of Consistent to the given pair of consequences. + +**Limits:** The latter theorem proves inconsistency; it neither constructs a repair nor determines which commitment should change. The resource example does not classify every practical tension. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t11) + + + +## T12 · Consistency is not truth or coverage + +Satisfiability does not establish truth at a designated actual world, and a satisfiable theory can leave an explicit question undecided. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples use Boolean worlds: the singleton assumption that the world is true, and the empty theory with the question whether the world is true. + +**Proof or check:** consistentFalse supplies the true model and refutes the singleton assumption at false. consistentIncomplete supplies models of the empty theory and uses opposite worlds to refute entailment of each answer. + +**Limits:** These are explicit satisfiability and non-entailment results, not an empirical classification of actual beliefs or a general incompleteness theorem for formal arithmetic. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-consistency-limits-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t12) + + + +## T13 · Reflexive work with actual inquiry and reasons + +Reflexive requires coherent principle registration and valid applications to every owned subject where each registered principle actually applies. A valid application carries the principle’s inquiry, reasons, limits and a result satisfying its independently specified meaning. + +**Premises and representation:** The parameters are an owner, registered principles and work records. ValidApplication binds principle identity, subject, generation/assessment activity, resolved target method, exact inquiry, nonempty target-matched reasons, limits and semantic result; applicability and ownership are explicit conditions. + +**Proof or check:** This declaration defines the obligation. The shared model’s completeOwnWork_reflexive supplies content-checked work for the system, two principles and their formation/application/revision processes; the evaluator uses actual samples, declared scope and counterexamples, and accepts an insufficient verdict for revision. + +**Limits:** Generation is required only for generationEligible subjects; application-phase processes receive assessment in this model. Valid work, including a negative verdict, does not prove the assessed principles correct or exhaust real reflexive inquiry. + +**State:** accepted (specification). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.reflexivity#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-p1), [organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-meaning-p1), [organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t13) + + + +## T14 · Self-application is not self-proof + +An applicable owned subject cannot be omitted from a Reflexive work set, while inapplicable subjects need not receive work. Passing a selected self-test and generating a revision oneself do not establish universal correctness. + +**Premises and representation:** noSelfExemption assumes Reflexive, principle membership, matching owner and applicability. applicabilityRetained preserves those conditions. The counterexamples use the same arithmetic principle across test and claim, and a GeneratingProcess with owner 17, a false prior, seed 0 and its actual output revision. + +**Proof or check:** The general proofs extract valid work and its scope. The arithmetic principle passes at 1 but fails at 0. selfOriginDoesNotSupport includes the actual producer/prior/output relationship: its revision passes the input-0 observation but fails at 1, giving an evidence-compatible counterworld to allTrue. + +**Limits:** Scope coverage is weaker than full valid Reflexive work. The examples reject self-certification implications; they do not show all self-tests or self-generated revisions are worthless. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1](#source-organon-charter-reflexivity-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t14) + + + +## T15 · Support, strength and scope + +Grounds binds the same claim to all actually applicable represented facets and their actual articulations. With evidence fixed, support is preserved when the conclusion is weakened or its quantified scope is restricted. + +**Premises and representation:** Grounds takes a claim, facet-indexed articulations, an actualApplicable predicate and a nonempty list covering that predicate. Each listed facet must have that claim, be articulated, match its actual premises/reasons/limits, and pass its disclosed assessment adapter. supportWeakening assumes Supports records p and pointwise p implies q; scopeRestriction assumes a supported broad-domain conclusion and inclusion of the narrower domain. + +**Proof or check:** The obligation is defined, not universally proved. Both preservation proofs apply the original support at the same compatible world and then the implication or scope inclusion. The empirical, inferential and value articulation adapters expose the corresponding real record compatibility, theory or option-indexed reasons. + +**Limits:** These theorems weaken conclusions, not evidence. FacetDischarged and the canonical articulation are application-specific semantic adapters, not a complete definition or proof of all source-level empirical or value adequacy. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds#p1](#source-organon-grounds-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t15) + + + +## T16 · All applicable aspects retain duties + +Duties for two sets of applicable aspects combine exactly as their union, and an added label cannot waive them. A claim with empirical and value aspects can pass the represented empirical check while failing its value procedure. + +**Premises and representation:** assessmentUnion uses two actual facet predicates; labelsCannotWaive uses a label that does not alter those predicates or FacetDischarged. The mixed switch example concerns the same selected-on claim: an actual observation assesses the selection fact, while adoption also invokes the value procedure. + +**Proof or check:** The general proofs distribute universal obligations over disjunction and unfold the label wrapper. mixedMissingResponsibility combines discharged switch evidence with an unsupportedPosition whose empty reason list fails ValueProcedure. + +**Limits:** The empty-list failure establishes missing recorded procedural responsibility, not that no adequate value reason could exist. Which aspects actually apply remains an explicit input requiring source-faithful judgment. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t16) + + + +## T17 · Articulation, repetition and assertion are insufficient + +Articulation, repeated irrelevant observations, compatibility with a theory and self-assertion each fail to establish the stronger claim in explicit counterexamples. A nonempty announcement can coexist with a real budget violation. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples distinguish observable temperature from another output and observed selection from available budget. The budget model evaluates the same adopted option with cost 3; starting assumptions fix selection without guaranteeing budget. A true activation announcement is compatible with budget 0. + +**Proof or check:** articulationNotSupport supplies a nonempty but uninformative articulation. measurementRepeatNotSupport retains counterworlds after repeating the same actual tests. compatibilityNotEntailment contrasts an existing joint model with a failed universal consequence. selfAssertionNotReason includes both missing reasons and the nonempty announcement case whose joint adoption is possible but whose actual cost exceeds its budget. + +**Limits:** These are failures for specified claims and grounds, not a dismissal of articulation, repetition or compatibility. The missing-reasons branch is procedural; the budget branch additionally gives a substantive counterexample within its chosen objective/constraint adapter. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t17) + + + +## T18 · Adopted value positions and joint reasons + +A value-assessment procedure can be fulfilled from a satisfiable adopted starting position that is not entailed by the empty theory. Joint reasons can support the adopted option’s actual consequence even when neither reason alone suffices. + +**Premises and representation:** ValueProcedure requires nonempty option-indexed reasons; one world satisfying starting assumptions, limits, adoption and all reasons together; joint reason support for that option’s objective and constraints within starting/limits; and a nonempty response to relevant criticism. These are the declared option–outcome assessment conditions. + +**Proof or check:** valueWithoutSelfProof constructs the beneficial on option, shows its starting theory satisfiable and its commitment not entailed by emptyTheory, and rejects opposite, contradictory and impossible adoption variants. heterogeneousReasons includes actual empirical/inferential/value cases and a benefit-4/cost-at-most-3 example: the reasons together pass, but worlds (4,5) and (0,3) defeat each reason separately. + +**Limits:** The procedure checks a disclosed application adapter, not ultimate value justification or a mandatory deductive form for every value reason. A response string is recorded engagement, not proof of a satisfactory reply; non-self-derived starting points are distinguished from inconsistent starts. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t18) + + + +## T19 · Local evidence and omitted differences + +Agreement on the observed input can conceal disagreement elsewhere, so input-specific evidence does not support a universal claim. + +**Premises and representation:** Worlds are Boolean-valued functions on natural-number inputs. zeroRecord observes only that input 0 returns true; the compared functions are constant true and localGenerator 0. + +**Proof or check:** localNotUniversal retains localGenerator 0 as a record-compatible counterworld to allTrue. hiddenDifference proves agreement wherever n = 0 and evaluates the differing outputs at n = 1. + +**Limits:** The conclusion concerns the stated observation scope. It does not rule out justified generalization from additional premises or establish a general statistical inference rule. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.scope#p1](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p1), [organon.grounds.scope#p2](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p2), [organon.grounds.scope#p3](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t19) + + + +## T20 · Observation, reproduction and stability + +One observation can support a bounded claim without repetition; a valid inferential assessment need not use observation at all. Record accuracy, reproduced conditions and stability of a conclusion are distinct, and different outcomes can preserve the same bound. + +**Premises and representation:** The observation concerns input 0 only. The non-observational facet assumes n = 2 and concludes n + 1 = 3. Trial explicitly separates setting, actualOutcome and recordedOutcome; Verified compares actual and recorded values, Reproduced compares settings, and Bounded means actualOutcome ≤ 2. + +**Proof or check:** singleObservation proves local support and refutes allTrue. noUniversalChain supplies a discharged arithmetic facet without observation. variableOutcomesStableBound uses actual outcomes 1 and 2 under setting 0; verificationReproductionStability supplies separate cases with changed settings, inaccurate records and an outcome above the bound. + +**Limits:** This is a finite possible-trial model, not a probability theorem, empirical reproducibility study or guarantee about future runs. It refutes a universally mandatory observation chain only within the represented assessment interfaces. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.scope#p1](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p1), [organon.grounds.scope#p2](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p2), [organon.grounds.scope#p3](#source-organon-grounds-scope-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t20) + + + +## T21 · Capability contracts and external assessment + +Correct outputs and an explanation contract are distinct for the same Process. Output-only and explanation-requiring applications have actual, scoped grounds; an external assessor can certify the former without the process providing an internal explanation. Duplicating inventory does not add represented operations. + +**Premises and representation:** OutputContract requires n + n for every natural input. ExplanationContract requires a provided Program whose evaluation equals that very process’s output at every input. processScope fixes the assessed process by equality; its canonical articulation and facet use that same scope and contract. ExternalCertificate is indexed by the actual process and distinguishes assessor 42 from assessed participant 7. + +**Proof or check:** Concrete evaluation proves both processes double their inputs; outputOnlyProcess has none, while explainedProcess supplies doubleInput. The same output-only process refutes the stronger full contract under its inhabited object scope. externalAssessment constructs the full output proof rather than assuming its truth; inventoryNotCapability proves available-operation membership unchanged by duplication. + +**Limits:** These arithmetic contracts are application choices, not a universal definition of capability or understanding. The explanation contract concerns an explicit certificate, not unobserved mental understanding; external participant identifiers do not establish real-world provenance. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.capabilities#p1](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p1), [organon.grounds.capabilities#p2](#source-organon-grounds-capabilities-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t21) + + + +## T22 · Relevant implementation reasons + +Status alone cannot satisfy the represented implementation-choice norm. An existing conventional implementation can satisfy it when its actual behavior supplies a relevant reason and it meets the requirements. + +**Premises and representation:** JustifiedChoice requires feasibility plus a listed Relevant reason. The adopted Relevant definition excludes status reasons and checks actual method content against requirements. The concrete identity application requires identity outputs, budget 1 and admits the output reason. + +**Proof or check:** statusOnlyFails unfolds the status branch for any requirements, implementation and status reason. conventionWithReason evaluates the conventional/established identity implementation and constructs its output-based justification. + +**Limits:** The exclusion is an explicitly adopted choice norm, not a value-neutral theorem. This case neither rejects all existing implementations nor proves the chosen requirements universally adequate. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p1), [organon.grounds.implementations#p2](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p2) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t22) + + + +## T23 · An accurate assessment does not enforce the extra choice norm + +Two independently specified choice policies complete the same accurate negative status-priority audit yet differ on the additional choice norm: the status-only policy fails and the output-reason policy passes. + +**Premises and representation:** Both policies select identity and share the true conventional/established facts, the exact question whether those facts entail identity priority, and report false. Only priorityReasons changes. GeneralAssessmentFulfilled records articulation and accurate completion of this audit; AdditionalChoiceNorm separately checks JustifiedChoice. + +**Proof or check:** generalGroundsNotChoice retains the status non-entailment countermodel and includes PolicyIndependenceExample. The successor interpretation satisfies the same status facts but refutes priority; statusOnlyFails and identityJustified then establish the opposed policy results without changing that audit. + +**Limits:** The result concerns fulfillment of the specified assessment procedure, not full philosophical Grounds. Continuing to prioritize unsupported status can also violate general support proportionality; this theorem does not claim otherwise or prove the choice norm independent of every core obligation. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p1), [organon.grounds.implementations#p2](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t23) + + + +## T24 · Openness does not imply equivalence or plurality + +An open choice setting may have only one feasible represented candidate. Local agreement does not make implementations equivalent, and eligible internal-method reasons need not suffice for selection when a required output is wrong. + +**Premises and representation:** The candidate type contains identity and successor, evaluated against identity outputs and budget 1. Relevant internal reasons are selected by Requirements.values and checked for faithful explanation, applicability, cost or procedure. A separate cheap successor costs 1 but still returns n + 1. + +**Proof or check:** singleFeasible identifies the unique feasible candidate. localNotGlobal contrasts agreement at 0 with disagreement at 1. internalReasons validates four real reasons for identity and includes a cheap-but-wrong counterexample. openNotEquivalent retains justified identity choice while proving its output differs from successor. + +**Limits:** Uniqueness is relative to these two candidates and stated requirements. Relevance is not sufficient feasibility, and openness does not entail equal merit, mandatory plurality or rejection of the existing option. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1](#source-organon-grounds-implementations-limits-p1) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t24) + + + +## T25 · Mutual application in one system + +The shared system maintains consistency through an acknowledged revision, carries owned assessment work and grounds for its own capability, assesses its general grounds provision, and evaluates its current philosophical method using relevant proposal decisions rather than status. + +**Premises and representation:** The examples use actualSystem and actual. The revised theory adds the same method’s input-0 fact and changes revision identity. GroundsProvision quantifies over arbitrary represented claims and facet packages under apply/waive permissions. The current philosophy method shares the system’s principle form and governance mode and is assessed on two specified proposal inputs. + +**Proof or check:** revisionKeepsConsistency reuses the same admissible witness and rejects a false change report. ownCapabilityGrounded combines owned assessment work with matching output grounds. groundsSelfAssessment evaluates the general provision through the grounds commitment’s actual acceptance/rejection consequences and relevant criticism. existingPhilosophyNotPrivileged proves acceptance of the valid proposal, rejection of the cheap wrong one, status-only failure and output-based justification for this actual method. + +**Limits:** These are constructed results for one system. Owned assessment work and capability grounds are separately checked components, not a claim that one work record contains the entire capability proof. Classical decision definitions are mathematical devices; the value adapter does not establish ultimate justification of the philosophy. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t25) + + + +## T26 · Distinct commitments and their combination + +Generative orientation alone does not ensure Reflexive work, and a charter-satisfying system can still present inadequate evidence for its own capability. A shared witness also shows the represented commitments can all be met together. + +**Premises and representation:** The first counterexample combines openPolicy with an empty work list despite an applicable system assessment. The second retains actualSystem, actual and its charter, but substitutes true cost-allowance evidence for the output-capability claim. jointWitness uses the matching capability evidence and complete owned work instead. + +**Proof or check:** generationNotReflexivity derives the missing applicable work from a supposed Reflexive proof. charterNotGrounds keeps a wrong-output world compatible with the cost record. jointWitness supplies one actual pair with admissibility, charter, capability duty, justified choice and each commitment’s grounds. + +**Limits:** These results establish the stated separations and coexistence, not complete pairwise logical independence of all commitments, a priority hierarchy, or automatic grounds for every charter-compliant claim. + +**State:** accepted (nonentailment). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t26) + + + +## T27 · Application duties and individual reasons + +An application that satisfies the adopted ApplicationDuties retains Reflexive work and all actually applicable, correctly articulated grounds for its own contract claim. Each of the five shared commitments separately has matched value grounds, joint adoption and relevant criticism, while its waive variant fails the chosen procedure. In the registered variation, the same evidence still supports the identity contract but does not support the changed successor contract. + +**Premises and representation:** applicationRetainsDuties takes a System, World, Requirements, arbitrary contract, facet-indexed articulations, applicability predicate and facet list, and assumes ApplicationDuties for those exact parameters. reasonsBelongToCommitments takes one of generation, consistency, reflexivity, grounds or choice; each position shares the governance choice but has its own actual consequence, reasons, constraints and criticism. + +**Proof or check:** The application theorem projects the assumed obligation, including same-claim equality and FacetArticulated for every listed facet. The commitment theorem constructs canonical grounds and joint witnesses, checks nonvacuous criticism, and contrasts apply with waive using actual operation expansion, contradiction handling, self-test coverage, evidence acceptance and implementation decisions. The supplementary applicationVariation case holds the system and observation fixed: the identity contract has matching grounds, whereas the successor contract fails at actual input 0 and its attempted empirical facet is rejected. + +**Limits:** The general application result does not prove arbitrary applications comply. The five reasons belong to distinct commitment positions in one selected option/outcome adapter; their checks do not derive normative authority from facts or prove all possible value reasons deductively sufficient. + +**State:** accepted (theorem). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.roles#p1](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p1), [organon.relationships.roles#p2](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p2), [organon.relationships.roles#p3](#source-organon-relationships-roles-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t27) + + + +## T28 · Assessment without observation tests + +A matched inferential assessment can have Grounds without an observation test, while a separately applicable empirical facet still uses observations. + +**Premises and representation:** The inferential facet explicitly assumes n = 2 and concludes n + 1 = 3, with canonical articulation and a nonempty model. The empirical comparison is the actual switch observation facet; usesObservation classifies the facet form. + +**Proof or check:** nonExecutableAssessment builds Grounds for the arithmetic claim from its satisfiable premise and semantic entailment, proves usesObservation is false there, and includes the discharged empirical switch facet with usesObservation true. + +**Limits:** The theorem separates assessment from observational testing; it does not prove this arithmetic reasoning uncomputable, classify every non-executable method or waive applicable empirical responsibilities. + +**State:** accepted (satisfiability). This is the review of this frozen target, not an upgrade to a complete proof of its source paragraphs. + +**Sources:** [organon.relationships.terms#p1](#source-organon-relationships-terms-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p1](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p1), [organon.grounds.assessment#p2](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p2), [organon.grounds.assessment#p3](#source-organon-grounds-assessment-p3) + +[Declarations, proof and line explanations](details.md#t28) + + +## Source tracing appendix + + + + +### `organon.preamble#p1` + +```text +This is the authoritative statement of Organon’s philosophy. It expresses adopted commitments, not factual assertions about every system or a proof of universal correctness. +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: passed; fidelity: not_applicable. + + + +This paragraph is cited as authority and interpretive context. The linked declarations do not prove the meta-level statement; its conditions remain in force. + +This declares textual authority and adopted-commitment scope, not a mathematical proposition about all systems. The review retains this boundary without manufacturing a Lean theorem of authority. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02). + + + + + + +### `organon.preamble#p2` + +```text +The quoted provisions, their meanings, and their conditions of application form the core. The charter and Grounds constrain one another; their grouping establishes neither a deductive hierarchy nor an order of priority. [Rationale](rationale/README.md) supplies arguments and cases without adding obligations to this core. Skills are revisable applications under the repository’s stated objectives and constraints, not part of the philosophical commitments themselves. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The shared model exhibits compatible constraints without a chapter-priority inference. Authority of meanings and limits, the role of Rationale and revisability of actual skills remain textual commitments outside this finite witness. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter` + +```text + + +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned. + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p1` + +```text +**Self-Transcendence · Internal Consistency · Reflexivity** +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +This is a structural list of three headings. It organizes substantive provisions and requires no fabricated theorem. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p2` + +```text +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It brings itself and its principles within the scope of generation and assessment, with internal consistency constraining this process. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +jointWitness combines valued expansion, revisability, contextual consistency and contentful owned principle work in one inhabited system. It proves model satisfiability, not actual compliance by arbitrary systems. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02), [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.overview#p3` + +```text +The overview connects three distinct requirements: self-transcendence establishes a generative orientation and refuses to treat existing forms as final, internal consistency constrains judgments held simultaneously, and reflexivity brings the system and its principles within the scope of their own generation and assessment. The provisions below specify the conditions for each. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The three requirements remain distinct predicates with a shared example and specific nonentailments. Their interpretation as philosophical obligations and their full conditions in arbitrary applications are not derived from the example. + +Related targets: [T01](#t01), [T02](#t02), [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1` + +```text +> A system is intrinsically oriented toward expanding what it can understand and construct. It does not regard any existing form as the endpoint of generation. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Generative specifies valuation and revisability of current forms. The finite tags and state examples do not characterize every form of understanding, construction or intrinsic orientation. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1` + +```text +A commitment to keeping generative possibilities open is distinct from valuing their expansion. A system has an intrinsic orientation when it regards that expansion as worth pursuing. Merely permitting change does not fully express this orientation. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The neutral-policy counterexample separates permission for distinct versions from the adopted valuation predicate. It does not establish what every real system values or justify the adopted value universally. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T04](#t04). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1` + +```text +Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint keeps it open to being surpassed. “Existing form” includes a system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. These remain within the scope of possible change; their revisability does not guarantee actual progress. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +All five represented form kinds, including organization, method and principle, fall under conditional revisability; a constant trace shows no progress guarantee. The chosen representation is not an exhaustive ontology or an executed revision. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T05](#t05). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1` + +```text +Whether progress has actually occurred remains a separate judgment. Having the orientation does not guarantee progress. Progress cannot be established merely by an increase in the number of artifacts, levels of abstraction, or terms. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The same before/after states increase inventory, abstraction and vocabulary without adding represented capabilities. Actual performance records can distinguish a genuine extension in a two-case world; empirical reliability beyond that world is not proved. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T06](#t06), [T07](#t07). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2` + +```text +- “Intrinsic orientation” expresses Organon’s philosophical commitment; it does not assert that all systems in fact develop autonomously. +- Self-transcendence does not imply independence from external experience, knowledge, or collaboration, nor does it guarantee autonomous execution or self-improvement. +- Refusing to regard an existing form as an endpoint does not require every action to produce change. Justified stability can coexist with a generative orientation. +- Whether transcendence expands what can be understood and constructed requires discernible grounds; a system’s own claim of generation does not establish actual achievement. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Bound execution exhibits separate external dependencies, grounded stability, a nonimproving trace and a refuted owned announcement. These are finite compatibility and failure examples; philosophical adoption and real autonomous development remain outside their conclusions. + +Related targets: [T03](#t03), [T06](#t06), [T07](#t07). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency#p1` + +```text +> The principles and judgments a system holds simultaneously, together with their implications, must not yield contradictory judgments on the same question under the same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The general semantic theorem prevents opposite consequences under one theory/context when an admissible world exists. Existence of such a world, choice of questions and interpretation of held judgments are explicit modeling conditions, not guaranteed for reality. + +Related targets: [T08](#t08). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1` + +```text +“Held simultaneously” specifies which principles, judgments, and implications must hold together. Revision may withdraw an earlier judgment; old and new principles need not remain compatible forever. When a change has occurred, that change cannot be represented as though it had not occurred. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Concrete retraction slices can reverse judgments, and a conditional reporting specification disallows concealing recognized change. No automatic detector, adequate report generator or real revision history is established. + +Related targets: [T09](#t09), [T10](#t10). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2` + +```text +“The same assumptions, meanings of terms, and scope of application” specifies the basis for comparing judgments. Divergent judgments under different conditions do not automatically constitute contradictions. Nor can unacknowledged changes in assumptions, meanings, or scope be used to conceal an existing contradiction. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Separate assumption, meaning and scope changes admit different judgments; hidden changes fail the adopted report condition. This covers explicit semantic models, not every practical ambiguity or method of concealment. + +Related targets: [T09](#t09), [T10](#t10). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1` + +```text +- Tension between different assessments or values does not directly constitute a contradiction. Revision or qualification is needed when they require incompatible conclusions under the same conditions. +- Internal consistency is not correctness or sufficiency. A set of principles may be internally consistent while relying on false assumptions or neglecting important questions. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Finite witnesses distinguish tension from contradiction and consistency from truth or completeness. Refusing to retain a demonstrated conflict is a conditional consequence of an adopted consistency requirement, not an implemented revision strategy. + +Related targets: [T11](#t11), [T12](#t12). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity#p1` + +```text +> A system’s principles of generation and assessment also apply to the system itself and to the formation, application, and revision of those principles. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Reflexive quantifies applicable owned rules and subjects, with coherent keys and meaningful application records. The concrete rule set has generation and assessment work but does not cover every possible real principle. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1` + +```text +Reflexivity encompasses both the system itself and its principles. Assessment concerns not only whether the system conforms to its principles, but also how those principles are formed, where they apply, and why they may need revision. The formation and revision of principles thus also become objects of generation and assessment. +``` + +State: **incomplete**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The revised module models formation purposes, requested applicability scopes and revision counterexamples with actual evaluation and generation outcomes. These finite inquiry contracts do not establish the correctness or completeness of every assessment methodology. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13). + + + + + + +### `organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1` + +```text +- Applying principles equally retains their conditions of application. When the relevant conditions hold, being the system itself is not a basis for exemption. Nor does the requirement of reflexivity establish that every principle can be applied to itself without examining its applicability. +- Self-application does not constitute self-proof. Subjecting a principle to its own assessment does not thereby establish its correctness. +- That a revision is produced by the system itself does not give it sufficient grounds. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Applicability is retained, self-exemption fails where conditions hold, and finite self-tests plus a produced revision fail to establish universal support. The owned records and source identities are mathematical objects, not authenticated execution histories. + +Related targets: [T13](#t13), [T14](#t14). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds#p1` + +```text +> The grounds of principles and judgments must be articulable and subject to assessment appropriate to the nature of the claim. The strength and scope of a claim must be proportionate to the support provided by its grounds. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Grounds checks identified applicable facets of the same claim; support, entailment and an option-indexed value procedure carry distinct responsibilities. This is a chosen formal interface and finite fulfillment examples, not a universal sufficient criterion for all philosophical grounds. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T15](#t15). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p1` + +```text +Articulation and assessment have distinct responsibilities. Articulability requires that concepts, assumptions, reasons, and limits can be identified. Assessment requires examining whether those grounds support the corresponding claim. Clearly expressed grounds are not thereby sufficiently established. When a claim has more than one applicable aspect, the corresponding assessment responsibilities apply to each aspect. Omitting a classification does not waive an applicable responsibility. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Articulation content is linked to each facet and separated from its discharge; union and missing-aspect examples prevent labels from waiving represented duties. Identifying every actually relevant aspect remains an application responsibility not solved by the datatype. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p2` + +```text +| Type of claim | Responsibility of assessment | What cannot substitute for that responsibility | +| --- | --- | --- | +| Empirical claim | Examine observations, evidence, and performance, together with the conditions, scope, and uncertainty of their support for the claim. | Treating measurability or repeatability itself as proof of relevance, correctness, or value. | +| Inferential claim | Examine whether the conclusion is supported by the stated assumptions and inferential relations. | Treating the absence of conflict between a conclusion and its assumptions as sufficient to establish that the conclusion follows from them. | +| Value commitment | State the position taken, its reasons, limits of application, and consequences, and remain open to relevant criticism. | Presenting a commitment as an empirical fact or a necessary inference, or substituting self-assertion for reasons. | +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The three modeled adapters check observational compatibility/support, semantic entailment, and value reasons with limits/consequences/criticism. Actual relevance, empirical uncertainty and the adequacy of value criticism beyond the chosen cases are not exhaustively formalized. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.assessment#p3` + +```text +Initial value commitments may be stated explicitly as commitments; they need not prove all their own starting assumptions. The strength and scope of a claim do not require conversion to a common numerical scale. Different types of claims specify their support and limits in accordance with their nature. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +JointAdoption requires consistent instantiated starting commitments without proving all starting assumptions. A two-reason example and heterogeneous facets avoid a universal numerical scale. They demonstrate procedural consistency, not ultimate value justification. + +Related targets: [T15](#t15), [T16](#t16), [T17](#t17), [T18](#t18), [T28](#t28). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p1` + +```text +Performance is discerned within particular relations, conditions, and scopes of observation. A boundary helps specify what a comparison concerns, but local examples do not automatically support unconditional universal conclusions. A judgment cannot establish that relevant differences do not exist merely because its chosen scope omits them. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A proper local observation scope supports a local function claim while admitting a counterexample outside it. This establishes the specified nonentailment; it neither identifies all relevant real differences nor rules out justified wider evidence. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p2` + +```text +Measurement can make some differences comparable. Repeated assessment can help examine the stability of corresponding conclusions. Their roles, and the role of any assessment framework, must be explained relative to the claim and its context. Measurement, repeatability, and an assessment framework do not form a universally necessary chain on which all judgments must depend. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Repeated irrelevant measurements fail support, while a valid inferential assessment needs no empirical chain. This refutes a universal mandatory chain within the represented responsibilities but does not characterize every framework or measurement practice. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.scope#p3` + +```text +An observation that has not been reproduced may still offer limited support, and random outcomes need not be identical on every occasion. The verifiability of observations, reproducibility of conditions, and stability of conclusions must be distinguished. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A single observation has limited support and distinct trial outcomes preserve a fixed bound. Verification, reproducible conditions and conclusion stability use separate predicates; no probability distribution or general reproducibility law is proved. + +Related targets: [T19](#t19), [T20](#t20). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.capabilities#p1` + +```text +Capability claims are subject to Grounds: the capability claimed, its conditions, and the support for it must be identifiable. The core does not prescribe uniform definitions of method mastery, method generation, or capability levels. Applications specify the capabilities they assess and may require understanding, explanation, or performance under relevant variations. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Output-only and explanation-bearing contracts concern the same process and each has its own checked Grounds; applicationVariation changes the actual objective and invalidates old evidence. No uniform real mastery or capability-level definition is derived. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T21](#t21). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.capabilities#p2` + +```text +Grounds for a capability claim may be supplied by an external assessor. Their articulability does not by itself require the assessed system to understand or explain its internal generation process. Evidence of reliable output must be assessed against the capability actually claimed; it does not automatically establish understanding of that process. Nor can the number of method documents, terms, tools, or artifacts alone establish a capability beyond what that evidence supports. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +A distinct assessor role supplies a proof about the exact output process while no explanation certificate is attached; duplicating four inventory kinds leaves represented capability unchanged. Role numbers and certificates do not prove external provenance or human-like understanding. + +Related targets: [T07](#t07), [T21](#t21). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations#p1` + +```text +> The choice of an implementation must be supported by reasons connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. Its name, conventional use, or established status alone does not provide sufficient grounds for giving it priority. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +The adopted choice interface requires feasibility and an objective/value/constraint-linked reason and rejects status-only reasons. Its finite reason vocabulary and concrete feasibility checks do not supply a general theory of warranted real implementation choice. + +Related targets: [T22](#t22), [T23](#t23). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations#p2` + +```text +This choice provision adds an additional evaluative commitment: name, conventional use, or established status alone is insufficient to establish priority. Grouping it under Grounds does not mean that it follows from the general requirement to assess reasons, or merely from the discernibility of performance. Conventions and existing arrangements may have practical significance, but that significance must be connected to the objectives and values pursued and to the relevant constraints. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Two independent policies share a correct negative audit but differ on the added choice norm, establishing independence from the represented assessment procedure. This does not show an unsupported priority claim fully satisfies general Grounds, or derive a value commitment from neutral facts. + +Related targets: [T22](#t22), [T23](#t23). + + + + + + +### `organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1` + +```text +- Openness does not make all implementations equivalent, nor does it guarantee multiple feasible implementations for the same objective. +- A method’s explanatory power, limits of application, simplicity, and explicit process requirements may all provide grounded reasons for assessment. They cannot be excluded merely because they concern methods internal to the implementation. +- Identical local performance does not establish overall equivalence. Relations, conditions, and the scope of comparison are constrained by the provisions of Grounds. +- Openness does not reject an implementation merely because it already exists or is conventionally used. Relevant reasons may still give it priority. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Concrete cases have one feasible candidate, unequal implementations, local agreement with wider difference and four eligible internal reasons. A cheap wrong-output method shows eligibility alone is insufficient. These results concern selected candidates and contracts, not all methods. + +Related targets: [T24](#t24). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships` + +```text + + +``` + +State: **not_applicable**; Lean: not_checked; fidelity: not_applicable. + +Structural heading without substantive direct-body content; no theorem is assigned. + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p1` + +```text +The charter states the generative orientation, the consistency constraint, and reflexive application. Grounds specifies support requirements for judgments and includes an additional commitment concerning implementation choices. Both parts belong to the core and constrain one another. Their placement neither makes Grounds a deduction from the charter nor gives the charter priority over it. Each commitment needs its own reasons. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +One shared model combines the charter and Grounds and assigns five commitments distinct operational reasons, limits and live criticism. Specified nonentailments prevent chapter order from doing logical work; neither the universal adoption nor ultimate justification of all commitments follows. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p2` + +```text +Internal Consistency concerns whether simultaneously held judgments can hold together; Grounds concerns whether and how far a claim is supported. A conclusion may fail to conflict with its assumptions without being supported by them. Self-Transcendence specifies a generative orientation and non-finality; neither establishes actual capability. Applications may supply objectives, values, and capability definitions; claims made under those objectives, values, and definitions remain subject to the relevant core provisions. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Consistency/support and orientation/capability remain separate; changing an application objective changes its actual claim and can defeat retained evidence. Universal application compliance is only an assumed conditional interface, not an achieved fact. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.roles#p3` + +```text +Self-Transcendence does not substitute for Reflexivity: keeping existing forms open to being surpassed differs from applying relevant principles to the system and to their own formation, application, and revision. Reflexivity extends these requirements to the system and to the formation, application, and revision of its principles. The grounds and limits of the Grounds provisions must themselves be articulable. The system’s own capability claims remain subject to assessment, and this philosophy’s existing form cannot gain priority merely from its established status. Such mutual application provides no self-proof and does not remove conditions of application. +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +Contentful self-application, exact own-capability assessment, the general Grounds provision and the same current philosophy method are linked in the model. Their checked coexistence supplies no self-proof, real execution guarantee or unconditional applicability. + +Related targets: [T02](#t02), [T12](#t12), [T23](#t23), [T25](#t25), [T26](#t26), [T27](#t27). + + + + + + +### `organon.relationships.terms#p1` + +```text +| Term | Meaning in this philosophy | +| --- | --- | +| Existing form | The system’s current organization, methods, and principles, not only its appearance or artifacts. | +| Assessment | Examination of reasons, applicability, and observed performance; not limited to executable tests. | +``` + +State: **limited**; Lean: passed; fidelity: partial. + +FormKind includes organization, methods and principles, and an inferential assessment has no executable-test requirement. These representations illustrate the terms without exhaustively defining every existing form or every non-test assessment. + +Related targets: [T05](#t05), [T28](#t28). + + + diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md b/lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..c0959eb --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/README.md @@ -0,0 +1,21 @@ +# Review objects and interpretation + +The final [target review](code-targets-final.json) accepts 28 frozen targets within their represented scope. The [source entries](code-source-entries-final.json) separately retain 31 partial correspondences and two nonformal paragraphs; two empty headings are additional structural entries in the manuscripts. No source paragraph is upgraded to full correspondence from target acceptance alone. Definition-only source entries remain without a proof of actual fulfillment; their normative specification targets are reviewed as specifications. + +The [source-first initial assessment](source-initial.md) preceded new encoding. A different reviewer received a comment-stripped Lean project with only technical context and preserved the [initial blind account](code-blind-initial.md) before source disclosure. Its [first source comparison](blind-source-comparison-initial.md) and [first target judgments](blind-targets-initial.json) rejected 11 targets. The separate [source-first code comparison](source-comparison-initial.md) also retained its own rejected branches. + +The [final code comparison](code-comparison-final.md) is an informed revision review, not a second blind review. It independently checked the revised model, complete actual declaration types and the dependencies of all 411 named source declarations. The [other final source comparison](source-comparison-final.md) retains T13 as pending independent approval because that reviewer implemented the reflexivity repair. The separate final code reviewer supplies that independent review. Its [identity record](code-review-identity.json) identifies exact inputs and outputs; agreement alone does not establish philosophical correctness. + +T23 is accepted for the represented finite duty to assess the same reasons and claim accurately. It does not establish the stronger proposition that complete general Grounds, excluding Choice, is satisfied while unsupported status priority remains justified. The [pre-code design](choice-scope-design-before-code.md) and [scope correction](choice-scope-reconciliation.md) preserve the initial wording ambiguity, its subsequent clarification and the stronger result not established. Non-entailment from the status facts is not by itself a proof of absence of all possible value grounds. + +The preamble's authority statement is a background citation for T02. Its `context_only` role retains `not_applicable` for mathematical proof; it does not waive the source's authority or conditions. The frozen source/declaration mappings remain intact. Each proof target still has substantive source correspondence and actually checked declarations. + +Final line explanations are informed translations. The independent code reviewer wrote Agency, Reflexivity, Integration and the root file; a model author wrote Logic, Evidence and Choice using the reviewer's symbol descriptions and actual source. The initial blind text remains distinct. Both languages explain the same 2,474 nonblank lines; coverage is not a semantic guarantee. A subsequent reader QA found a T27 overstatement and syntax-only explanations of substantive proof lines. The [reader revision record](translation-revision.json) identifies the corrected four views and separate revised translation inputs. The earlier frozen translation artifacts in the code-review identity remain unchanged; they are not presented as the current line explanations. + +These public records are presentations of unchanged local originals. Host directory prefixes are replaced with descriptive labels so the current package has no machine-path dependency. [Derivation hashes](presentation-derivations.json) retain original and presentation identities. `Core/` denotes the Core tree; private-check labels identify historical evidence rather than required paths. The original freeze called the catalog `targets-frozen.json`; its target bodies are retained in [targets.json](../targets.json); the current source binding is covered by the separate migration review. Current builds and manuscript checks need no private history. + +## Current source migration + +The [2026-09-15 comparison](source-migration-2026-09-15.md) reviews the new source version and rationale path. Earlier initial and final review files keep their original objects and wording. The current fidelity object reuses their unchanged code, assumptions and target judgments only within that separate comparison; it does not relabel them as new blind reviews. The original preregistration and its catalog hash identify the preceding source-bound catalog; current target bodies are identical and the source binding is new. Historical source/run/readers replayed in a separate complete copy before replacement. + +The [provenance follow-up](source-migration-provenance-2026-09-15.md) covers the two required unit-hash comment changes in Integration.lean after the first current gate rejected stale provenance. The new code-file identity is recorded; all executable text and target bodies remain unchanged. The earlier byte-identity statement describes the object before this correction. diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-source-comparison-initial.md b/lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-source-comparison-initial.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..630c4e5 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/blind-source-comparison-initial.md @@ -0,0 +1,504 @@ +# 第一候选独立来源比较首案（冻结） + +日期：2026-09-14。评审代理：`/root/fresh_model_blind`。 + +## 结论及范围 + +28 个冻结目标：**accepted 17，rejected 11，pending 0**。第一候选的数学代码已编译成功；62 个冻结声明的实际完整类型与本代理先行盲读的代码逐项一致。拒绝结论是来源对应或冻结目标完成性判断，不是声称 Lean 已检查的定理为假、原文自相矛盾，或数学证明应证明所有价值立场为真。 + +本首案仅评估第一候选 `2026-09-14T02-57-54.555Z-9709-f08e31` 的固定 `project` 与 `declaration-types.json`，不得作为后续候选的批准。已完成盲读并冻结两份盲稿之后，才阅读指定权威来源、编码前独立清点、冻结目标与来源段落。没有读取作者判断、target-narratives、其他评审或正在变化的候选工程。没有改代码、哲学原文或既有盲稿，也没有再委派。 + +“accepted”表示这一冻结家族内要求的有限形式结果及解释边界得到满足，不是接受一切可能解释或证明整个哲学。明确规范接口的投影按规范后果接受；额外要求实质对应、内容性见证和非蕴涵分支时，不以接口字段存在或定理名称代替。不存在只因主题难于形式化便把已冻结 D/W 分支降为非定理的处理。 + +## 关键判断 + +1. **有限模型不是一般能力。** `Integration.World = Candidate` 只有 identity/successor。观察 input 0 能识别 identity，所以全输入能力随实现定义推出。这是有效的封闭模型推理，不是从单次测试归纳所有程序。T02 的这一共享能力/预算/观察/选择部分是真实交互，单独通过；拒绝该家族的原因是其他冻结分支未齐。 +2. **规范接口不是现实履行；但也不能丢掉规定的对象。** `Reflexive` 保留 owner/applicable 条件和两种活动；其 `Performed` 只是 pair 会员。作为明确规范覆盖投影可以接受，不能据此表示实际程序已运行。T13 另要求形成理由、适用域考察和修订理由，当前对象没有这些内容，故该分支未完成。 +3. **价值承诺不必被证明真，与理由必须对应立场是两回事。** 盲读已编译出恒 False commitment 的 ValueProcedure/Grounds；这本身不要求所有价值立场成为事实，更不是 Lean 推出 False。实质缺陷是 `ValueProcedure` 不读取 commitment/starting，替换任意不相关 commitment 不影响通过性。它只检验理由推出另一可任意指定的 consequence。T15/T25/T27 需要实际理由与当前立场的联系，不能由这一接口自动得到。修正应允许非演绎价值理由和未证起点，而不是强行要求理由逻辑证明承诺。 +4. **已有有限价值见证仍可通过。** T18 的 switchPosition 把所选 true 选项的成本/收益作为具体理由，起点另证可满足，批评世界有响应，并证明空理论不推出承诺。这一有限程序相容性目标成立，通用接口的较弱性不自动否定该具体存在见证。 +5. **事实优先命题与额外选择规范不可混同。** T23 当前证明“两个 status facts 不推出 selected=identity”；冻结问题是一般评估责任不推出额外的反 status-only 优先规范。现有反例没有独立可变 choice policy，也没有一般责任履行而该额外规范失败的同一模型，因而不能算规范独立性完成。 +6. **Grounds 条款自身不同于一次能力的 Grounds 满足。** `commitmentClaim .grounds` 是固定 `OwnCapabilityDuty capability [capabilityFacet]`。其观察理由支持该能力，却不是 Grounds 条款采纳/适用要求自身的理由。`existingPhilosophy` 也仅修改 identityImpl.name，没有连接到本模型的采纳政策或原则。因此 T25 的这些反身对象尚未对应来源。 +7. **不能用并列标签替代同一对象。** T06 中外部资源求和确实依赖三个 Option，但没有把该算法与 Generative 政策的系统执行/状态相连；稳定阈值没有连接到应用约束/动作；自述仅 `expanded=expanded`。T07 也尚未将通用 support 定理实例化为同一 before/after、基线、条件和成就主张。已有库存非扩展反例保留，其余分支须实际补齐。 +8. **不用额外提高已冻结有限例子的标准。** T08–T12、T16–T20、T22、T24、T28 的通过范围依各实际数学定义限定：例如 Q 可为空、解释力代理只是数值等同、procedure 只看末项、Trial 的复现只看 setting、非经验不等于不可计算。这些界限不能被宣传性名称扩大，但不自动推翻冻结的有限反例/接口后果。 + +## 28 项总表 + +| 目标 | 判定 | 理由 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| T01 | accepted | 来源、规范/事实及章节角色边界得到保留；本项通过仅表示边界和来源记录合格，不代表其余27项目全部实现。 | +| T02 | rejected | jointWitness确有非空数学见证，但其反身工作与各承诺理由未达到冻结的共享、内容对应模型；较弱接口的可满足性不能算所选Core规范已联合满足。 | +| T03 | accepted | Generative作为明确采纳的有限规范接口保留价值取向与当前形式可修订性，未内置必然变化或进步。 | +| T04 | accepted | 明确非空政策允许不同版本对，但完全不赋扩展价值，足以区分许可与价值取向。 | +| T05 | accepted | 通用kind/version覆盖和具体可修订却无扩展见证均成立；投影性质须如实标记。 | +| T06 | rejected | 数量与非进步分支有内容性见证；外部执行/稳定与同一系统状态的联系尚未建模，自称生成分支更只有构造器自等式，11分支未齐。 | +| T07 | rejected | 任意claim的support应用定理正确，但冻结要求的同一能力变化、基线和条件实例及取向/自述不提供其支持的反例没有完成。 | +| T08 | accepted | 通用语义与非空见证阻止同题正反结论；实际三前提冲突显示不能仅逐项检查。 | +| T09 | accepted | 时间切片撤回旧命题后保留相反命题的可满足性及联合冲突明确；三种上下文变化分别有非空见证。 | +| T10 | accepted | 单向报告规范、语义变化反例、表示顺序不变以及独立revisionIdentity触发均达到冻结的规范接口范围；并未实现自动检测。 | +| T11 | accepted | 两约束有共同可行值但非同一谓词；同条件正反后果明确违反一致性。修订责任是采纳规范的条件后果，未声称已实现修订算法。 | +| T12 | accepted | Bool模型具体区分可满足性与指定实际world真值，并给指定问题的双向非蕴涵；其现实重要性不由数学裁定。 | +| T13 | rejected | 系统/原则/三阶段和两类活动的条件覆盖已表达，但原则形成理由、适用域审查及修订理由仍只由活动标签代替，未完成冻结的完整规范对象。 | +| T14 | rejected | 适用性与有限检验反例通过；自产修订分支没有与同一主体/旧新对象关联的自我产生事实，仅演示任意局部生成函数的观察不足。 | +| T15 | rejected | 结论弱化与范围缩窄定理成立；完整Grounds规范中的价值理由对应当前claim仍无检查，不能以该较弱接口代表全部来源责任已保留。 | +| T16 | accepted | 面向义务的并集/标签不变和同一switch claim的经验＋价值缺责反例完整；规范接口局限另见T15。 | +| T17 | accepted | 所列不充分替代物有实际内容反模型；非蕴涵未被说成结论恒假。价值反例只证明所示理由/预算责任失败，不是价值真理。 | +| T18 | accepted | 具体switch价值立场有成本/收益理由、限度、非空批评响应及可满足起点，并未从空理论推出承诺；异类支持不用统一数值尺度。 | +| T19 | accepted | 实际观测域{0}是真子域，兼容函数在1表现不同，支持与非支持结论均由计算/反模型成立。 | +| T20 | accepted | 单次观察的有限支持、非经验推论及不同结果同范围结论、三概念分离都有实际有限实例；不声称概率或非计算性定理。 | +| T21 | rejected | 输出/附加解释合同的分离与四类库存复制正确；但冻结的两个应用均受Grounds、外部评估者供应可表达根据的同对象见证尚未构造。 | +| T22 | accepted | 在单独采纳的选择规范下，三类纯身份理由统一被排除；既有惯用identity仍以真实输出理由被接受。 | +| T23 | rejected | 现有定理证明status facts不蕴涵“选择identity”这一对象命题，而没有证明一般评估义务不蕴涵额外的反status优先规范；两种独立性目标不能混同。 | +| T24 | accepted | 冻结所需有限开放性例子均存在；选择接口的一般充分性仍很弱，不能从这些存在例子推导所有相关内部理由足以满足全部目标。 | +| T25 | rejected | 有真实模块交互的能力与一致性部分通过；Grounds条款自身、现有哲学同对象及原则过程的对应仍不足，不能以实例义务替代规范自身。 | +| T26 | rejected | 两个指定非替代方向有有效有限反例；完整联合正见证依赖T02仍缺失的对应关系，家族不能全部通过。 | +| T27 | rejected | labels不豁免固定例子的义务已证明；可变应用目标/能力及每项承诺自身理由的冻结范围尚未实现，字段等式不等于理由对应。 | +| T28 | accepted | 有实际n=2⇒n+1=3的结构化推论Grounds且无需经验测试，同时保留经验facet的观测责任。非经验不是不可计算。 | + +## 逐家族、逐分支依据 + +### T01 — accepted + +分类：N/E-V boundary。 + +实际前提与对象范围：权威文本为所指定PHILOSOPHY 0.1.3；其权威和采纳不是由Lean推出。source-paragraphs保留22源单元、全部段落/表格/限制；标题无伪造定理。 + +冻结声明：无（来源/规范边界项）。 + +来源：`organon.preamble/p1`, `organon.preamble/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p1`, `organon.charter.overview/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p3`。 + +- **authority — accepted**（`PHILOSOPHY.md:8; source-paragraphs.json`）：原文SHA与冻结目标一致。数学类型不包含“所有现实系统都遵守”或哲学普遍正确性结论。 +- **meanings-and-limits-record — accepted**（`source-paragraphs.json`）：22单元含义、条件、表格和bullet均作为来源保留；具体语义实现缺口在相应T项判定，不能由本项通过抹去。 +- **roles-and-headings — accepted**（`CoreReader.lean:1`）：Charter/Relationships标题未被制造为True定理；来源明确Rationale/Skills不增加核心义务，组合代码未赋章节顺序以演绎权威。 + +### T02 — rejected + +分类：W satisfiability plus N interpretation。 + +实际前提与对象范围：无外部实质参数；世界仅identity/successor；取actual=identity、固定openPolicy、固定held/context、预制十项work；value Grounds使用各自singleton适用面。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness`。 + +来源：`organon.preamble/p1`, `organon.preamble/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p3`, `organon.relationships.roles/p1`, `organon.relationships.roles/p2`, `organon.relationships.roles/p3`。 + +- **inhabited-world-and-judgments — accepted**（`Integration.lean:24-68,238-245`）：actual提供真实模型；held有能力和预算命题，观察在两个候选内识别identity，非空且非全真记录占位。 +- **shared-capability-and-choice — accepted**（`Integration.lean:101-116,238-245`）：相同implementation用于capability、budget、observation和output choice；这一部分确有模块交互，观察推广限于封闭候选类。 +- **principle-process-content — rejected**（`Agency.lean:192-207,253-269; Integration.lean:93-98`）：五个对象/两种活动确非空，但Performed仅pair会员关系，原则形成理由、适用域考察和修订理由没有可表达内容；预填记录不足以完成冻结的内容性对象分支。 最小修正条件：补充与这些subject相连的实际评估问题/理由/范围/结果对象，并用非空记录验证相应义务；不要求现实系统已经运行。 +- **individual-commitment-reasons — rejected**（`Integration.lean:130-180`）：generation理由是两函数在0输出不同，仅推出存在不同输入；Grounds承诺字段可任意重贴而ValueProcedure不变。因此联合对象尚未提供每项承诺自身理由。 最小修正条件：建立每项承诺与其理由、限度及批评响应的可审查联系，保留价值承诺不必被证明为事实的边界。 +- **no-priority-from-conjunction — accepted**（`Integration.lean:95,238-245`）：合取本身未推出章节优先级或普遍哲学正确性。 + +### T03 — accepted + +分类：N specification。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Policy四谓词独立；Aim为两标签，Form为五种类加Nat版本；规范后果是条件投影，不证明现实系统遵守。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.Generative`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.overview/p2`, `organon.charter.overview/p3`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p2`。 + +- **orientation — accepted**（`Agency.lean:13-35`）：worthPursuing选择理解/构造扩展这一被采纳目标；与permitsVersion字段独立。 +- **nonfinal-current-forms — accepted**（`Agency.lean:5-21,33-35`）：∀current form→revisable覆盖组织/方法/原则及外观/产物；没有预装严格改善序列。 +- **no-actual-success-guarantee — accepted**（`Agency.lean:33-35,103-127`）：定义不含实际transition或Expanded证明；无进步trace提供边界。 + +### T04 — accepted + +分类：W nonentailment。 + +实际前提与对象范围：neutralPolicy继承全允许版本关系但worthPursuing恒False；版本0≠1由Nat计算。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation/p1`。 + +- **permissible-nontrivial-change — accepted**（`Agency.lean:37-51`）：允许0→1且0≠1；证明许可，不声称此变化已执行。 +- **valuation-independent — accepted**（`Agency.lean:43-51`）：Generative因所需价值取向为False而失败；不是将两个概念写成同一布尔量。 + +### T05 — accepted + +分类：N/D projection and W witness。 + +实际前提与对象范围：revisabilityCovers前提为Generative p及p.current指定form；无进步见证用独立恒定trace。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers`, `CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality/p1`, `organon.relationships.terms/p1`。 + +- **form-coverage — accepted**（`Agency.lean:5-11,58-59`）：任意五种form kind均受∀current→revisable规范约束，包含全部必要种类。 +- **projection-boundary — accepted**（`Agency.lean:58-59`）：只是将已采纳规范实例化，不是发明可修订性或执行修订；这正是冻结规范后果范围。 +- **revisable-without-progress — accepted**（`Agency.lean:116-127`）：openPolicy可修订与常值baseState trace并存，每步Expanded均假。 + +### T06 — rejected + +分类：W eleven branches。 + +实际前提与对象范围：generationLimits无参数，由具体常量计算；Generative policy、assistedExecution、State trace、Announcement彼此不通过系统/执行对象相连。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p2`。 + +- **a-orientation-without-progress — accepted**（`Agency.lean:123-127,157-171`）：有价值/非终局政策且base与inflated之间无理解/构造成员增加。 +- **b-more-artifacts — accepted**（`Agency.lean:107-114,160-161`）：同一before/after状态inventory复制，understood/constructed不变。 +- **c-more-abstraction-layers — accepted**（`Agency.lean:113,160-162`）：层级列表增加而同一状态的能力成员不增加。 +- **d-more-terms — accepted**（`Agency.lean:114,160-163`）：词汇列表增加而理解/构造成员不变。 +- **e-external-experience — rejected**（`Agency.lean:129-142,164-165`）：Option计算确实读取experience，缺失即none；但没有标明该计算是这项Generative系统的执行，结果也不进入其状态。合取任意外部函数仅证明相容，未满足冻结同一内容系统要求。 最小修正条件：将政策、被执行算法、资源和before/after或执行结果纳入同一对象，再展示experience缺失的实际失败。 +- **f-external-knowledge — rejected**（`Agency.lean:136-140,166`）：knowledge依赖计算正确；同e，缺少同一系统执行绑定。 最小修正条件：复用同一绑定执行对象，分别删knowledge验证失败。 +- **g-collaboration — rejected**（`Agency.lean:136-140,167`）：collaborator缺失的Option失败正确；其同一主体/执行含义未建模。 最小修正条件：在上述共享执行对象中保留协作槽及单独缺失反例。 +- **h-no-autonomous-execution — rejected**（`Agency.lean:168`）：⟨none,none,none⟩导致独立求和函数失败；没有该系统自主执行接口，不能把任意失败函数当其不能自主执行。 最小修正条件：明确这就是被评系统的执行接口，并把无外援调用关联其执行结果。 +- **i-no-self-improvement — accepted**（`Agency.lean:116,169`）：常值trace每步无Expanded；可作为所选无自我改善轨迹，不是所有系统永远不改善。 +- **j-grounded-stability — rejected**（`Agency.lean:145-147,170`）：StableReason给出构造内容相等和inventory越过阈值1，但没有稳定动作或被追求的预算/价值条件；阈值本身尚未关联该系统稳定选择的理由。 最小修正条件：把1作为明示应用约束，并证明保留当前状态的动作满足它且不丢所需能力，同时政策仍Generative。 +- **k-self-announcement-not-achievement — rejected**（`Agency.lean:149,171`）：expanded=expanded只是枚举构造器自等式，不是某系统对同一变化的announcement，也没有achievement-support的失败命题。 最小修正条件：定义带主体、before/after和claim的实际报告，构造报告生成而同一claim不成立/缺充分支持的反例。 + +### T07 — rejected + +分类：D conditional fragment with N accountability。 + +实际前提与对象范围：achievementNeedsSupport前提为Compatible records actual和Supports records achievement，结论直接应用support；AchievementAccountability完全等于Grounds。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability`, `CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p1`, `organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits/p2`, `organon.grounds/p1`, `organon.grounds.capabilities/p1`, `organon.grounds.capabilities/p2`。 + +- **conditional-inference — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:113-115`）：对任意W及claim，支持加actual兼容性推出actual处claim；没有伪称实际可靠性已证明。 +- **same-change-baseline-scope — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:102-115; Agency.lean:103-105`）：未把achievement实例化为同一before/after的Expanded；没有对应基线、记录内容、条件或非空支持见证。 最小修正条件：给变化世界/记录及明确Expanded类claim，证明非空兼容性、支持和actual结论；保留通用定理。 +- **orientation-and-report-insufficiency — rejected**（`Agency.lean:157-171; Evidence.lean:113-115`）：generationLimits只给无Expanded和标签自等式，未建立对上述achievement的support失败。 最小修正条件：复用同一变化世界，构造有取向/报告但兼容反世界使支持失败。 +- **accountability-interface — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:89-104`）：别名能存对应claim但value分支允许理由/commitment脱离，不能作为完整成就规范接口的完成证据；也没有achievement实例履行。 最小修正条件：将实际成就的适用经验/推论面与同一claim绑定，检查匹配的Grounds；不要由规范接口宣称真实成就已获证。 + +### T08 — accepted + +分类：D theorem and W countermodel。 + +实际前提与对象范围：W,Q任意Type；Consequence在同一t/c所有Admissible worlds上量化；显式存在admissible world；Q空时Consistent空真是范围边界。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency`, `CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency/p1`。 + +- **simultaneous-and-implications — accepted**（`Logic.lean:4-26`）：Theory含全部选择命题，Entails/Consequence量化所有模型，包括实际蕴涵而非仅扫描字符串列表。 +- **same-context-noncontradiction — accepted**（`Logic.lean:31-35`）：同一admissible witness使正反结论矛盾；不存在证明现实理论必有model的隐藏步骤。 +- **joint-conflict — accepted**（`Logic.lean:50-69`）：三个单项分别有Bool-pair模型，联合P、P→Q、¬Q无法满足；关键反例内容真实。 + +### T09 — accepted + +分类：W retraction and context models。 + +实际前提与对象范围：revisionSlice 0选择true、1选择false；固定时间的held理论由函数决定，撤回表现为旧命题不在新切片。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse`, `CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p1`, `organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p2`。 + +- **retraction-and-opposite — accepted**（`Logic.lean:71-88`）：旧/新slice分别有true/false模型，联合无模型，编码的是撤回后的状态而非永久兼容要求。 +- **slice-consistency — accepted**（`Logic.lean:31-35,78-88`）：slice显式给Satisfiable而非直接Consistent；在空附加假设/全scope的自然问题上下文中，可由同一非空model一般定理得到一致性，未引入实质源外前提。 +- **assumption-change — accepted**（`Logic.lean:90-122`）：固定问题含义，仅世界假设true/false变化，正反后果各有admissible witness。 +- **meaning-change — accepted**（`Logic.lean:93-94,105-106,116-121`）：假设固定true，meaning改为等于true/false，反转判断而各context非空。 +- **scope-change — accepted**（`Logic.lean:95-96,107-108,118-122`）：假设为空、meaning固定，scope改选true/false；不要求跨context一致。 + +### T10 — accepted + +分类：N/D specification consequences plus W examples。 + +实际前提与对象范围：changed是¬SameContent或revisionIdentity不同；TruthfulReport是changed→report=true；规范本身是显式前提。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported`, `CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant`, `CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p1`, `organon.charter.consistency.meaning/p2`。 + +- **semantic-change-report — accepted**（`Logic.lean:124-144`）：held/context语义成员、meaning、scope差异均触发报告责任；报告真不反推变化，无不报告变化的许可。 +- **representation-order — accepted**（`Logic.lean:150-152`）：union两个singleton的顺序变化不改变命题集合；仅覆盖这种表示变化。 +- **hidden-context-changes — accepted**（`Logic.lean:160-179`）：分别对assumption/meaning/scope构造¬SameContent，使false报告违反规范。 +- **independent-revision — accepted**（`Logic.lean:127,136,164,179`）：同content但revisionIdentity从0到1也禁止false报告；外部已识别文字/形式修订必须由调用方赋正确identity，不宣称代码检测了全部变化。 +- **report-not-adequacy — accepted**（`Logic.lean:165-181`）：true报告仍与新assumption在true实际world不成立并存，不为修订内容背书。 + +### T11 — accepted + +分类：W witness plus D norm consequence。 + +实际前提与对象范围：具体预算约束4≤n和n≤6；反向定理显式给同一t,c,q的positive/negative Consequence。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction`, `CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.limits/p1`。 + +- **tension-without-conflict — accepted**（`Logic.lean:186-190`）：预算5同时满足不同上下界，0证明两谓词不等；有限模型展示不同目标不等于不可同时满足。 +- **conflict-requires-nonretention — accepted**（`Logic.lean:195-197`）：同题同context正反后果使Consistent失败；在采纳一致性规范下不能原样保留该状态。未提供哪一项应改的价值判断或算法。 + +### T12 — accepted + +分类：W truth and coverage separation。 + +实际前提与对象范围：第一例取false为所检查实际world、true为model；第二例空Theory但Bool非空，指定claim w=true及其否定。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse`, `CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.consistency.limits/p1`, `organon.relationships.roles/p1`, `organon.relationships.roles/p2`, `organon.relationships.roles/p3`。 + +- **false-assumption — accepted**（`Logic.lean:205-208`）：singleton w=true可满足但在指定false world不成立，足以展示一致理论不自动为实际真。 +- **undecided-relevant-question — accepted**（`Logic.lean:216-222`）：明确检验w=true这一选择问题，两个Bool模型使正反均不被emptyTheory蕴涵。问题被指定为关注对象；未证明任何现实问题的重要性。 + +### T13 — rejected + +分类：N specification; projections are not executions。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Reflexive对任意owner、rules、records条件量化；Performed仅pair会员关系；Principle只有activity/applicable；Subject只有owner/id/phase。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.reflexivity/p1`, `organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning/p1`, `organon.charter.reflexivity.limits/p1`。 + +- **objects-and-activities — accepted**（`Agency.lean:175-207,253-269`）：系统、原则、formation/application/revision过程均有独立constructor/phase；generation和assessment两个活动均在非空ownRules中。 +- **applicability-conditions — accepted**（`Agency.lean:206-216`）：owner和rule.applicable是独立条件；自我身份不取消已适用规则的记录义务。 +- **formation-reasons-scope-revision-reasons — rejected**（`Agency.lean:192-207,261-269`）：没有任何subject关联的形成理由、适用域考察或修订理由字段/问题/评估内容；十个预填活动pair无法区分“仅合规自查”与来源要求的多问题审查。 最小修正条件：增加最小的assessment-question/content接口并关联原则及对应phase；明确三个问题均在责任范围，以非空解释性记录/实例证明覆盖。无需证明现实评估已发生。 + +### T14 — rejected + +分类：D conditional projection and W boundary cases。 + +实际前提与对象范围：noSelfExemption假定Reflexive及适用性；selfTest测固定算术predicate；localGenerator由Nat seed生成函数，代码无revision/producer/owner关系。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption`, `CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained`, `CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve`, `CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport`。 + +来源：`organon.charter.reflexivity.limits/p1`。 + +- **no-self-exemption — accepted**（`Agency.lean:213-216`）：对同owner且适用的rule直接得到要求的record；不把identity与applicability等同。 +- **nonapplicable-boundary — accepted**（`Agency.lean:228-251`）：application-only规则可被履行而system assessment缺失；说明不能忽略条件要求所有自应用。 +- **finite-self-test-not-universal — accepted**（`Agency.lean:287-304`）：实际all运算在[1]通过，0使n+1=2n失败；有限内部测试不提供普遍正确性。 +- **self-origin-of-revision — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:331-350`）：证明生成函数f只在0为true且zero observation不支持allTrue，但未表示它是某系统自身生成的修订，也无修订前对象。作为局部观察反例有效，作为冻结自产修订分支欠对象联系。 最小修正条件：增加最小producer/owner及before/proposed关系或共享系统构造，让其自身生成该candidate，并保留当前内容性support反模型。 + +### T15 — rejected + +分类：D semantic support fragment plus N Grounds。 + +实际前提与对象范围：支持在记录兼容世界中全称；weakening明确假定p→q，scopeRestriction假定narrow⊆wide及wide支持；Grounds由调用方给actualApplicable。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds`, `CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening`, `CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **same-claim-support — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:7-15,89-93`）：记录含实际test/result，经验/推论facet的claim与target必须相等；不是无解释support布尔字段。 +- **conclusion-weakening — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:123-132`）：假设同记录支持p及p→q，推出支持q；另有删记录会失支持反例，不混淆证据弱化。 +- **scope-restriction — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:140-144`）：将结论的量词域从wide缩为included narrow；不扩张观察域，也不补造现实可靠性。 +- **articulation-and-aspects — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:17-24,50-93`）：概念/假设/理由/限度可储存，facet对齐并要求所有声明适用面，经验加非空in-scope world排除矛盾观察空真。 +- **value-reason-correspondence — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:26-38,45-62`）：ValueProcedure不读取commitment或starting；替换任意不相关commitment不改变通过性。理由只需推出另一个任意consequence，不能确保陈述的是此立场的理由。False-commitment探针不是要求价值立场证明为真，而是揭示对应关系缺失。 最小修正条件：给可审查的立场/理由相关性与后果关系接口及非空实例，允许未证明的价值起点，拒绝不相关重贴和纯自断言；不必强制reason逻辑推出commitment。 +- **full-compliance-versus-interface — rejected**（`Evidence.lean:35-38,89-104`）：当前接口还允许空limits和恒定非空字符串使关键责任空真；原文保留适用性，但此代码不能由字段存在声称已经开放于相关批评。 最小修正条件：为作为完成见证的实例给实际适用世界和内容相关批评/响应，不把整个通用域强行设非空，也不将接口当现实履行证明。 + +### T16 — accepted + +分类：D union theorem and W mixed case。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Duties以任意Facet谓词为适用关系；labels在定义中无作用；mixed经验与价值facet的claim都为w=true。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion`, `CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive`, `CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **union-not-exclusive — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:146-160`）：Facet是单面向枚举，但适用关系可同时选多个facet，union定理合并义务而非强制单选。 +- **unlabeled-duty — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:148-168,208-214`）：空标签不改变applicable责任；这是显式规范设计的定义后果，非实证分类器。 +- **actual-mixed-claim — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:181-214`）：switchEmpirical与unsupportedPosition同为w=true的主张；经验面实际discharged，价值面reasons=[]使义务失败，非两个无关claim标签。 +- **three-facet-and-articulation-elements — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:17-70`）：四类表达要素和三种责任接口独立存在；本项通过不认可ValueProcedure是完整价值正当性判定器。 + +### T17 — accepted + +分类：W countermodels。 + +实际前提与对象范围：Bool、Bool×Bool、Bool×Nat为实际模型类；可测测试读取一个coordinate；重复相同record不添加未测预算信息。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport`, `CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport`, `CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment`, `CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **articulated-not-established — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:216-235`）：非空concept/reasons但emptyTheory不支持w=true；另有不相关articulation与facet对齐失败。 +- **measurable-not-relevant-or-correct — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:237-243,273-293`）：第一coordinate可测且重复结果稳定，第二coordinate可true/false；单次和重复均不支持未测结论。 +- **repeat-not-value-reasons — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:248-293`）：action=true记录与budget0和3都兼容，无法支持budget consequence；非空announcement自述仍未履行价值reason→consequence检查。 +- **compatibility-not-entailment — accepted**（`Logic.lean:229-234`）：加入w=true与emptyTheory相容，但emptyTheory并不蕴涵它；有true/false反世界。 +- **self-assertion-not-reason — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:253-262,300-306`）：既有空reason反例，也有非空真自述在budget0不能推出所声称后果的内容性反例。 + +### T18 — accepted + +分类：W/N procedural satisfiability。 + +实际前提与对象范围：switchPosition取行动true，采用该承诺为起点，成本3/收益4；事实不被宣称必然推出价值采纳；反事实false world有响应。 + +冻结声明：`CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof`, `CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons`。 + +来源：`organon.grounds.assessment/p1`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p2`, `organon.grounds.assessment/p3`。 + +- **reasons-limits-consequence-openness — accepted**（`Evidence.lean:178-193`）：成本/收益理由与所选择true选项有具体关系，推出cost Exhibit the independence of the added choice obligation from the represented general assessment obligations, without placing it in those premises; qualify the model scope rather than claim neutral facts establish a value commitment. + +预定接口 `CoreReader.Choice.generalGroundsNotChoice` 只是待实现接口。本设计不因这个名字而要求或宣称完整规范 Grounds 已履行。 + +## 结论与精确命题 + +**可以在冻结的 represented general assessment obligations 边界内构造非空反例。** 取同一个优先主张 q、同一组非空地位理由 E、同一比较域和明确限度；正确完成对 E 是否支持 q 的评估，得到“不能推出”的判断；选择模块仍仅凭地位给出 q 所称优先性，违反额外选择条款的“地位本身不足以确立优先”限制。 + +应证明的是：存在一个内容模型 M，使以下二者同时成立： + +1. 对 M 中同一 q/E 的**有限评估程序职责**已完成，并有可核验的正确评估结果和反模型。 +2. M 中实际采用的优先理由仅是既有地位，因而不满足额外选择条款的一项必要条件。 + +**不能把它升级为**“同一未限定的优先主张 q 已充分满足完整一般 Grounds，但仍违反 Choice”。本模型中，q 的提出者若在知道理由不足后仍保持其无条件优先断言，便未满足 U14 的强度/范围与支持相称要求。完成评估不等于被评估主张获得支持；报告评估为不足不等于 q 必假。 + +这是对冻结目标已明示的模型范围作实例化，不修改目标，不增加规范，也不将难以证明的形式分支改列为边界。它不建立全部一般 Grounds 在充分规范意义上与 Choice 的独立性；该更强命题既不是此模型的结论，也不能借接口名称暗示。 + +## 同一对象的最小内容模型 + +### 1. 实现、任务和主张 + +取两个不同的实现 `A` 与 `B`。当前任务、比较范围、术语含义和假设保持固定。若实现中需要展示实际任务内容，可令两者都在布尔输入上计算恒等函数：A 直接返回输入，B 按真假分支返回相同布尔值。两者在该任务上都可行；这些可行性事实只是固定背景，不产生谁应优先的比较结论。 + +唯一被评估的选择主张 q 是： + +> 在当前任务及候选集合 {A, B} 中，A 应优先于 B。 + +q 是一个**规范性的优先主张**。以下形式解释检验“给定理由是否逻辑支持该主张”，不把 q 偷换为描述性命题“某排序程序恰好先输出 A”，也不把形式解释中的 q 真值宣称为实际价值真理。 + +### 2. 非空且有内容的理由 + +公开事实为：A 是既有实现；B 不是既有实现。理由集 E 包含这两个实际可识别的事实记录： + +- `Established(A)`； +- `not Established(B)`。 + +每个记录都关联 q 和同一任务/时间/候选范围，有清楚的概念含义和判定值。它们不为空，不是任意字符串，也不是“因为它应优先，所以应优先”的重述。它们提供了关于候选地位的真实内容；问题在于这些内容是否足以支持**优先性**，而不是这些事实有没有发生。 + +就非蕴涵证明而言，一个 A 地位事实已足以组成非空 E；此设计保留第二条，用来使 A/B 地位差异及选择行为明确。对象域采用两个候选和两种优先序；不声称已证明全局最小形式。 + +### 3. 两种具体优先序解释 + +取两个有限解释，地位事实完全相同，优先关系分别是： + +| 解释 | A 既有 | B 既有 | 严格优先序 | q | +| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | +| w₁ | 是 | 否 | A 在 B 前 | 真 | +| w₂ | 是 | 否 | B 在 A 前 | 假 | + +“世界”在这里是可计算的语义解释，不是声称存在两套已被正确论证的现实价值体系。优先关系来自两个元素的两种排列，因而是有内容、可计算的严格全序；不是另设一个可任意填写的 `supports` 或 `nonEntails` 布尔量。 + +理由满足关系 `E(w)` 逐项检查地位事实。定义所建推论片段的支持： + +`InferentialSupport(E, q) := 对每个满足 E 的解释 w，q(w) 成立。` + +计算可得 w₁、w₂ 都满足 E，而 q(w₂) 不成立，所以 `not InferentialSupport(E, q)`。证明须显式给出 w₂ 及 E 在 w₂ 中成立、q 在 w₂ 中不成立；不是将“不支持”预装为输入字段。 + +该反例不假设地位永远无实际意义。它只检验给定理由中**没有**其他连接目标、价值和约束的优先理由时，不能由地位事实本身推出 q。没有加入 `Established(x) → Priority(x)` 之类的桥接前提；加入该前提会改变待检验的论证，而且其规范根据需要另行交代。 + +### 4. 同一主张的真实评估 + +评估记录必须直接包含 q 的标识、E 的全部记录标识、固定范围、计算所得两个兼容解释、判定“不蕴涵”和反例 w₂。验证器重新计算 E/q 的语义，核验报告中的反例，而不是只检查记录字段非空。 + +可表达限度具体是： + +- E 只提供当前候选的既有地位事实； +- 评估只讨论当前任务与 {A, B}，未声称其他候选或未来情况； +- 未提供由既有地位通向优先性的规范桥接前提； +- 因而 q 目前不被 E 推出；这不证明 q 在现实中错误，也不排除另有相关理由使 A 优先。 + +价值面向可如实记录：提出者的立场是仅因 A 既有而优先选择 A；给出的理由是 E；后果是 B 虽可行仍被排到 A 后；评估承认对“为何既有地位应优先”的批评，并明确当前理由不能回答这一批评。这样不是用“立场已陈述”证明价值正当性。实际理由不是空记录；准确结论正是“有理由内容，但没有所声称的支持力量”。 + +### 5. 选择仍违反额外条件 + +同一系统的选择模块按照既有地位将 A 排在 B 前。它对 q 的优先理由只使用 E，没有把其他实现的评估报告或另一个主张的根据拿来代替 q 的根据。审查模块正确指出 E 不推出 q，而选择模块继续持有 q；二者不是逻辑矛盾，因为“不被这些理由支持”不等于“q 为假”。 + +Choice 部分无需构造一个全新“实现必须满足什么”的规范。直接使用源文已有的必要条件：**仅既有地位不足以确立优先性**。实际优先理由全部是地位事实，且提出者仍声称据此具有优先性，因此该必要条件未满足。不能把单纯选择了可行 A 与宣称 A 凭地位享有优先权混同；违规的是后者的理由与优先主张。 + +若随后系统撤回 q，或者取得与目标、价值、约束相关的实际理由，这就是另一个状态。本反例不阻止它被修正，也不把既有实现永远排除。 + +## 哪些责任已完成，哪些没有 + +| 责任/性质 | 本模型状态 | 实际依据与限度 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| 对象与主张可识别 | 已完成 | q 始终是同一任务中 A 对 B 的规范优先主张 | +| 概念、假设、理由、限度可表达 | 已完成于有限结构 | 明确候选、地位事实、E、解释域及缺失桥接前提 | +| 理由非空且真实对应 q | 已完成 | 两条 E 记录就是提出者为 q 使用的地位事实；不借另一 claim | +| 事实记录在模型中可核验 | 已完成 | 两个解释都明确满足两条地位事实 | +| 检查 E 是否支持 q | 已完成且结果正确 | 实际枚举解释、提供并验证 w₂，结论为不蕴涵 | +| 不把不蕴涵当作 q 恒假 | 已完成 | w₁ 满足 q；报告仅拒绝所检验的推论 | +| 价值立场、给出理由、限度、后果及批评可见 | 可在该程序结构中完成 | 记录立场与真实有限理由，并承认其不能回答相关批评；不证明充分正当性 | +| 全部经验根据的现实可靠性 | 未证明，不属于此有限结果 | 地位事实是该有限模型的已给事实；不声称所有现实记录可靠 | +| 未限定 q 的支持强度/范围相称 | **未满足** | q 仍被声称，但 E 不推出 q；不能标成充分 Grounds 合规 | +| 初始价值立场的充分正当性 | 未证明 | 说明理由和接受批评不自动证成该立场 | +| 额外 Choice 的地位限制 | **未满足** | 实际优先仅以既有地位为理由 | + +由此，`represented assessment duties completed` 可以为真，而 `Choice status condition satisfied` 为假。`FullGrounds(q)` 不应被标真，也不应把“记录了 Grounds 结构”作为其证明。 + +## 建议的通用数学接口及不可偷换项 + +接口应参数化候选、事实理由、优先关系解释、主张语义、论据满足关系和评估报告，而非只为 A/B 定义一个恒真的 `GeneralGrounds`。至少区分： + +1. `ArticulatedArgument`：有可解读的同一 claim、premises/reasons、条件和限度。 +2. `AssessmentCompleted` 或同义名称：执行并正确记录“是否支持”的检查；允许支持或不支持两种结果。 +3. `InferentialSupport`：由解释集合的实际语义定义，不是记录存在性。 +4. `ProportionateAssertedClaim`：若选择模块保持该强度的 q，则需要与其相称的支持；本反例对这个性质不能出具证明。 +5. `ChoiceStatusCondition`：直接表达源文的地位本身不能给予优先，不冒充完整 Choice 的充分定义。 + +预定 `generalGroundsNotChoice` 若保留该名字，实际类型和读者解释必须写清它的前项是**represented finite assessment obligations**。若前项实际叫 `Grounds`，也必须在类型和文稿中公开说明它只表达此程序片段；否则容易将程序完成性读成全规范合规。不能把此模型的 `AssessmentCompleted` 与冻结 T15 中承载更广责任的 `Evidence.Grounds` 未加区分地等同。 + +禁止的修补包括： + +- 令另一个无关 claim 成为 Grounds 见证，仍对 q 做坏选择； +- 把 reasons/limits 填几个字符串即判为依据充分； +- 假设 `Support(E,q)`，再投影“已支持”； +- 把 q 改成“StatusFirst 算法输出 A”的描述性命题，却仍宣称证明规范优先性； +- 加入“所有既有实现本来就应优先”的新规范桥接前提而不承认目标已改变； +- 把“正确发现支持不足”算成“未限定 q 已受充分支持”； +- 用空 claim、空解释域或没有实际使用理由的选择变量获得反例。 + +## 实际可运行验证及结果 + +本轮以 `rtk run` 调用 Python 对独立设计执行有限枚举；没有创建或读取 Lean。第一次探索脚本检查两个排列、理由非空和反模型；第二次完整脚本让 q 的报告回指同一 claim/理由，并实际计算报告正确性、Choice 必要条件和所建推论片段的相称性。第二次结果为： + +```text +{'candidates': 2, 'worlds': 2, 'reasons': 2, + 'same_claim_report_valid': True, + 'inference_entailed': False, + 'choice_status_exclusion_satisfied': False, + 'modeled_inferential_proportionality': False} +actual_assertions=pass; full normative Grounds compliance not claimed +``` + +第二次脚本的核心断言可以原样重跑： + +```sh +rtk run 'python3 - <<'"'"'PY'"'"' +from itertools import permutations +candidates=("A","B") +orders=tuple(permutations(candidates)) +status={"A":True,"B":False} +reasons=(("established","A",True),("established","B",False)) +worlds=tuple({"order":o,"status":status.copy()} for o in orders) +def E(w): return all(w["status"][i]==v for tag,i,v in reasons) +def q(w): return w["order"].index("A")`，记录完整命令、cwd、返回码和输出至该次 `rechecks/run-*/receipt.json`，不覆盖冻结结果；首次复核结果保留在 `final-recheck-receipt.json`。语义判断仍来自定义、实际证明和反模型；构建通过不会替代来源审查。 + +| 源文件 | SHA-256 | +| --- | --- | +| `CoreReader/Agency.lean` | `b0dca4187a88a0a0f33c3dd6a11bb383907603ef514e80e9e3f09f95ce9633e2` | +| `CoreReader/Choice.lean` | `07cf17f73802bdd34ae00ecba317ddc0283321cce00f15a84b69df421c3fe25f` | +| `CoreReader/Evidence.lean` | `18beb2b94450fdab36229b645e2df129348f3e67306104e842e0dce6e72443e8` | +| `CoreReader/Integration.lean` | `6821e55e284fcc69136a77adf9375b335e9b5f567d9124ef728e562d4b9eb4e1` | +| `CoreReader/Logic.lean` | `6b70be8964763b6447a2603bde665ff58106678f2e1d421bebd8c6b29ae46e04` | +| `CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean` | `25292faa71c5585a8f50cb07d72c2f44fa12dcfb125b2b92094f9306fecb4fd0` | +| `CoreReader.lean` | `80eee78ec3453fefdb26d3dbce97f0447d4b9ffeb4683604dad0c03902a1bfdd` | + +## 实际语义及关键限制 + +- Logic 的一致性依赖显式 admissible world、固定问题语义和情境；可满足性不能转成现实真值。空问题类型仍可使一致性空真，因此正见证使用具体非空问题与世界。报告定理投影已采纳的单向 TruthfulReport，不提供自动检测或充分报告。 +- Evidence 的 Grounds 逐项检查已声明适用的同一主张方面。它不自动发现全部实际适用方面。空适用列表或空起始理论不是一概非法；只有当它们被用来冒充实际必要内容时才构成对应错误。有限支持模型允许空观察支持逻辑有效命题，不因此宣称现实经验根据已充分。 +- 新 ValuePosition 将立场选项与结果、目标、约束、理由相连；JointAdoption 排除无可满足联合起点。ValueProcedure 是所选程序适配，不是普遍价值理论。Integration 的 positionConsequence 在给定操作模型内直接成立，证明会忽略传入的理由模型前提；这是更强的模型内后果证明，并非隐藏结论前提，也不意味着理由是这些后果的必要原因。实际理由、在适用限度内成立的批评、反选项失败和外部价值边界需同时阅读。 +- Reflexive 不再只是 subject/activity 配对存在性。它要求真实问题、目标、适用范围、理由、方法对应与结果；有限算法的 insufficient 结果可算一次正确履行评估职责，绝不是原则已经正确。生成的候选方法只是 MethodDraft，不声称已成为正确方法或在现实中执行。 +- 外援、稳定、公告与自产修订已绑定同一模型主体及相关对象。外部评估者编号是区分角色的数学数据，证书携带同一 process 的实际证明；没有建立现实身份认证、外部消息来源或人的理解。 +- JustifiedChoice 现在同时要求 Feasible 和相关理由。廉价但输出错误的 successor 说明“内部理由相关”不是“所有目标约束充分”。两个候选构成封闭比较类，不是所有可行实现的枚举。 +- Integration 的一般 GroundsProvision、当前哲学方法与变化应用合同都有真正对象关联。applicationRetainsDuties 是明确条件接口的投影；独立补充 applicationVariation 才给出同系统改变真实目标后的失败实例。没有把规范条件写成现实已履行。 + +## T23 的最后质疑与解除边界 + +首案只有 `statusFacts` 不蕴涵 `priorityClaim`，再合取 status-only 选择失败；这不足以提供独立可变的选择政策。修订后 `ChoicePolicy` 的 `priorityReasons` 与审查对象相互独立，两个政策保留同一 selected、同一非空事实理由、同一实际 priority 问题及正确的否定审查，而采用不同实际优先理由。`PolicyIndependenceExample` 证明一项符合额外选择规范、另一项不符合。该独立政策缺口已真实修复。 + +仍须区分两个前项：A 是完成所表示的理由评估程序，允许正确发现给定理由不蕴涵主张；G 是除额外 Choice 外全部实际适用 Grounds 责任充分履行，包括所有方面以及强度/范围与支持相称。`GeneralAssessmentFulfilled` 只包含表述、同一审查和准确性，因此模型证明 A∧¬C，并提供 A∧C 对照；没有证明 G∧¬C。从前者不能推出后者。 + +最终接受 A 范围有直接来源根据：原文 2.4 指定 “general requirement to assess reasons”，2.1 将评估解释为检查是否支持，而不是确保被评主张获得支持；冻结英文明确写 “represented general assessment obligations” 和 “qualify the model scope”。这不是仅凭函数名解释目标。原 source-first 中文末句“不包含该额外承诺的一般要求”确有被读为 G 的较强歧义，不能说原稿从未有歧义，也不能凭设计早于代码便断言完全等强。如果把该中文强读法作为额外合同，G 分支仍未完成；本次 accepted 不覆盖该强读法。后续来源澄清保留了这个历史差异，未改原稿或冻结哈希。 + +此外，`¬ Entails statusFacts priorityClaim` 只否定所表示的推论支持，不证明该价值优先主张恒假、缺乏所有可能价值理由或必然违反全部一般相称要求。反解释也没有加入全部实际应用可行性条件；不能把 successor 反世界说成在 identityRequirements 下同样可行。两个政策保持实际实现函数和已证明可辨识表现不变；这些事实本身不赋予额外价值优先规范。 + +如果读者稿写成“完整一般 Grounds 合规仍可仅凭地位正当地获得优先”或用 generalGroundsNotChoice 的名称省略上述 A/G 区别，该表述应 rejected，即使这次有限类型证明通过。 + +## 逐目标结果与首案变化 + +下表是阅读索引；`final-target-verdicts.json` 保留每个原 branch、原判定、原缺口与最小修正条件，并给当前陈述、真实声明行号、证明范围和修订依据。行号属于最终 7 文件，不复用历史空白副本的行号。 + +| 目标 | 首案 → 最终 | 最终依据与范围 | +| --- | --- | --- | +| T01 | accepted → accepted | 权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 | +| T02 | rejected → accepted | 同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 | +| T03 | accepted → accepted | Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 | +| T04 | accepted → accepted | neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。 | +| T05 | accepted → accepted | 所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 | +| T06 | rejected → accepted | 11分支均有同对象内容：三类数量膨胀不扩能，同一生成系统执行分别依赖经验/知识/协作，无外援失败，稳定动作保持所需能力并满足预算，自述对同一次变化的内容被反驳。 | +| T07 | rejected → accepted | 保留任意支持关系的条件推论，并新增同一次扩展的基线、测试条件、记录、非空兼容世界和Grounds；同一报告在膨胀反世界也成立，故报告不支持成就。 | +| T08 | accepted → accepted | 显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 | +| T09 | accepted → accepted | 撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 | +| T10 | accepted → accepted | 语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 | +| T11 | accepted → accepted | 具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。 | +| T12 | accepted → accepted | 模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。 | +| T13 | rejected → accepted | Reflexive现在要求一致的原则登记、同所有者对象、实际问题/理由/范围/结果及方法契约；形成、应用、修订内容已由有限评估与生成函数实际计算。 | +| T14 | rejected → accepted | 无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 | +| T15 | rejected → accepted | Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 | +| T16 | accepted → accepted | 义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 | +| T17 | accepted → accepted | 表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 | +| T18 | accepted → accepted | 有限价值立场有可满足但无需自证的起点、选项相关理由、限度、后果和批评响应；两理由联合充分而各自不足，异类方面无需统一尺度。 | +| T19 | accepted → accepted | 真实观测域{0}内一致而在1不同的函数构成局部支持与普遍非支持；省略差异不能消除差异。 | +| T20 | accepted → accepted | 单次观察有限支持、无必需统一链的推论、不同结果保持指定界，以及核验/条件复现/结论稳定的分离均成立。 | +| T21 | rejected → accepted | 同一process的输出与附加解释要求分开，两种应用都有对应Grounds；外部证书携带不同评估者/被评者标识及该process实际输出证明；四类库存复制不扩展所表示能力。 | +| T22 | accepted → accepted | 在额外采纳的选择规范下三类纯身份理由均失败；既有惯用实现仍凭实际输出理由和可行性获接受。 | +| T23 | rejected → accepted | 新政策对象在相同且准确的否定审查后独立采用不同优先理由，完成所表示的一般理由审查而额外选择规范一成一败；通过严格限于冻结清单所称represented assessment obligations。 | +| T24 | accepted → accepted | 单一可行实现、不等价、局部相同全局不同及四种内部理由均有实例；新增廉价错误输出反例说明相关理由不是自动充分。 | +| T25 | rejected → accepted | Grounds承诺已扩展对应一般GroundsProvision而非一条能力义务；实际哲学方法绑定同系统原则形式和政策，并对两个提案计算选择，旧对象错配已消除。 | +| T26 | rejected → accepted | 取向不保证反身履行、Charter不提供某个能力证据包的支持，以及共享全接口正见证均成立；仅证明这些指定方向。 | +| T27 | rejected → accepted | 任意应用要求和合同的条件义务接口已参数化；补充applicationVariation对同一系统改变真实期望输出并证明旧证据失败；五项承诺由各自选项后果、理由和限度区分。 | +| T28 | accepted → accepted | 结构化推论评估给出真实n=2到n+1=3的根据且不要求经验测试；经验方面仍保留观察责任。 | + +## 来源条目判定 + +`final-source-entries.json` 提供全部 33 段的 fidelity、英文 reason 和对应 reason_zh。accepted 目标不自动把来源升级为 full；有限类型、规范接口及有限反模型与原文现实/规范范围的差异逐段保存。 + +`organon.preamble#p1` 是权威、采纳性质及非普遍正确性边界，判 not_applicable。它虽被 T02/jointWitness 作背景范围引用，jointWitness 只遵守该阅读边界并展示所采纳接口的相容实例，不证明元层权威声明。背景引用不能强迫这段成为数学证明源；schema 如把这种引用等同 formal proof coverage，应修复角色适配而不是硬升 fidelity。`organon.charter.overview#p1` 是三标题结构列表，亦不适用。其余 31 段有实际有限对应且保留未形式化部分，故 partial；没有全段 full。 + +## 逐行稿与交付边界 + +本人生成的 informed 英中逐行片段覆盖 `CoreReader.lean`、Agency、Reflexivity、Integration 的全部 1141 个非空行，包括来源映射注释，键是精确相对路径与 1-based 行号。根文件 1 行、Agency 251 行、Reflexivity 367 行、Integration 522 行。空白行无说明。英文说明解释实际语义和证明步骤，中文按同一结构翻译；canonical articulation 表示按已有内容构造表述，不是新添哲学规范。 + +Logic/Evidence/Choice 的最终逐行稿由另一个获委派的 informed 稿件作者提供；本人独立读取并审查其模型语义，但不冒称本次片段已包含那三文件。Root 合并及读者任务验证属于后续整套读者交付检查。本报告不提前断言合并稿已经通过。 + +没有编辑模型或哲学原文，没有删除或覆盖初始判断。此次比较不对未提供的更晚候选、未来修改或现实部署生效。 diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-review-identity.json b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-review-identity.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..aa0b3bd --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-review-identity.json @@ -0,0 +1,52 @@ +{ + "review_kind": "informed revision comparison, not blind", + "snapshot": "Core/private historical check objects/2026-09-14T03-53-09.030Z-12298-3c6aab", + "target_statuses": { + "accepted": 28, + "rejected": 0, + "pending": 0 + }, + "target_scope": "T23 accepted for represented finite assessment duties A only; stronger full non-Choice Grounds G independence is not established", + "source_statuses": { + "partial": 31, + "full": 0, + "not_applicable": 2, + "rejected": 0, + "pending": 0 + }, + "line_fragments": { + "files": [ + "CoreReader.lean", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean", + "CoreReader/Integration.lean" + ], + "nonempty_lines": 1141, + "coverage": "Agency/Reflexivity/Integration/root only; remaining three modules authored separately" + }, + "historical_preserved_sha256": { + "BLIND-INITIAL.md": "2575d7f5963e22b2729ac837d30d54e302f63085588030bb25f5ea1961173484", + "code-explanations-en.json": "e00bf3e4a16265caea1d065d4103c7dff08235949054efe084308446863a754e", + "SOURCE-COMPARISON-INITIAL.md": "7f43edcb8eeefb62f102fde11c239c5f7e286e26c5413dbb59d07bc965d4c273", + "target-verdicts-initial.json": "e29e5e008c4b84268c8be97c82687c00edb6d83993e4cef05a330c1e4e43ecb9" + }, + "inputs_sha256": { + "Core/PHILOSOPHY.md": "1a0bebd61e35d46a3ba2e882305ce60f423e37a343ecdfd0b6f314e437aade59", + "Core/private maintenance records/source-first.md": "9d6db04489a10a5aab217601ad69f006d4fd1ee1183aec9a7314764b4c3d8afd", + "Core/private maintenance records/targets-frozen.json": "35cda8ba439af8b32fd180efae2829b370bc5b82960cc91feb24e3e03636d2f4", + "Core/private maintenance records/source-paragraphs.json": "011581c7b79823bf0a68275cd7b695ba074a1a027fbe7063d29f7b3f6bf8dab8", + "Core/private maintenance records/source-first-T23-design.md": "58486132f6c712c9db3c2a2dc0f159f2a02fd98de5c825d899effbe8d5cd35c4", + "Core/private maintenance records/T23-scope-reconciliation.md": "e5faa35d911bddd1100fb16a9b2d651adf4c6fd34ddc8262ae7a38b5428c59c8" + }, + "artifacts_sha256": { + "final-target-verdicts.json": "bc7832edfe322293783a91b0583edbeff1435e4ff8c62d182a6a7ad7a32c0a77", + "final-source-entries.json": "5e5dd7f82844deb10f246bb83f427a77720a0a39e95a4d64a394b9b7219411df", + "final-source-comparison.md": "8676b4e3f63cb3868bdec79e49ed4bd0ead2006ae6fde659dde64159a5bacaa2", + "code-explanations-final-en-part.json": "d8743576726a90b5fc4bd40ca2df65265764e1e615f32eb56054ec9a7b8c4311", + "code-explanations-final-zh-part.json": "35050657e105df084b4836f9073f56daf5ab634a0fb4f3217d488f3ef2d72fd0", + "final-execution-checks-v3.json": "cc25d759d0c2a081bda9f96fe669ce1d09f18d7ad189c861656ebf2cae1e1d22", + "final-recheck-receipt.json": "531dd734fcbcd5c2c2d694225bf9ad825290c255bfbaf49e30367b221b741c04", + "recheck-final.py": "969ec8fc4f0998044e0576395c27146903f02492c590d26c2f5a556b9d084457", + "FinalReviewCheck.lean": "e7037edf17953820b4b05c4a52c9b71ec18bf71d611bf6fb0d9e0eaab86be1d4" + } +} diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-source-entries-final.json b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-source-entries-final.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..18d2870 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-source-entries-final.json @@ -0,0 +1,353 @@ +[ + { + "id": "organon.preamble#p1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This declares textual authority and adopted-commitment scope, not a mathematical proposition about all systems. The review retains this boundary without manufacturing a Lean theorem of authority.", + "reason_zh": "本段声明文本权威与采纳承诺的范围，并非关于所有系统的数学命题。审查保留该边界，不制造证明文本权威的Lean定理。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02" + ], + "mapping_role": "authority-and-adoption-boundary; linked declarations illustrate compliance with this reading, not a proof of the boundary" + }, + { + "id": "organon.preamble#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The shared model exhibits compatible constraints without a chapter-priority inference. Authority of meanings and limits, the role of Rationale and revisability of actual skills remain textual commitments outside this finite witness.", + "reason_zh": "共享模型展示约束可以共同成立，未从章节位置推出优先性。含义与限度的权威、Rationale的角色及实际技能可修订性仍是有限见证之外的文本承诺。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview#p1", + "fidelity": "not_applicable", + "reason": "This is a structural list of three headings. It organizes substantive provisions and requires no fabricated theorem.", + "reason_zh": "本段是列出三项标题的结构性文本，用于组织实质条款，无需虚构定理。", + "targets": [ + "T01" + ], + "mapping_role": "structural-heading" + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "jointWitness combines valued expansion, revisability, contextual consistency and contentful owned principle work in one inhabited system. It proves model satisfiability, not actual compliance by arbitrary systems.", + "reason_zh": "jointWitness在同一非空系统中组合扩展价值、可修订性、情境一致性和具有内容的自有原则工作；它证明模型可满足，不证明任意现实系统履行这些要求。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02", + "T03" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.overview#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The three requirements remain distinct predicates with a shared example and specific nonentailments. Their interpretation as philosophical obligations and their full conditions in arbitrary applications are not derived from the example.", + "reason_zh": "三项要求保留为不同谓词，并有共享实例和特定非蕴涵结果。其作为哲学义务的解释及任意应用中的完整条件，不能由实例推出。", + "targets": [ + "T01", + "T02", + "T03" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Generative specifies valuation and revisability of current forms. The finite tags and state examples do not characterize every form of understanding, construction or intrinsic orientation.", + "reason_zh": "Generative规定对扩展的赋值及当前形式的可修订性。有限标签和状态实例没有刻画理解、构造或内在取向的全部形式。", + "targets": [ + "T03" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The neutral-policy counterexample separates permission for distinct versions from the adopted valuation predicate. It does not establish what every real system values or justify the adopted value universally.", + "reason_zh": "中性政策反例把不同版本的变更许可与采纳的价值谓词分开；它不确立每个现实系统重视什么，也不普遍证成所采纳的价值。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T04" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "All five represented form kinds, including organization, method and principle, fall under conditional revisability; a constant trace shows no progress guarantee. The chosen representation is not an exhaustive ontology or an executed revision.", + "reason_zh": "五类已表示的形式包括组织、方法和原则，均受条件性可修订要求约束；常值轨迹说明不保证进步。该表示不是穷尽性本体分类，也不是已经执行的修订。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T05" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The same before/after states increase inventory, abstraction and vocabulary without adding represented capabilities. Actual performance records can distinguish a genuine extension in a two-case world; empirical reliability beyond that world is not proved.", + "reason_zh": "同一前后状态增加库存、抽象层级和词汇，却未增加已表示的能力。实际表现记录能在两类世界中区分真正扩展，但没有证明该世界之外的经验可靠性。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T06", + "T07" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Bound execution exhibits separate external dependencies, grounded stability, a nonimproving trace and a refuted owned announcement. These are finite compatibility and failure examples; philosophical adoption and real autonomous development remain outside their conclusions.", + "reason_zh": "绑定的执行接口分别展示外部依赖、有根据的稳定、无改善轨迹及被反驳的自有报告。这些是有限相容性与失败实例，哲学采纳和现实自主发展不在其结论范围内。", + "targets": [ + "T03", + "T06", + "T07" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The general semantic theorem prevents opposite consequences under one theory/context when an admissible world exists. Existence of such a world, choice of questions and interpretation of held judgments are explicit modeling conditions, not guaranteed for reality.", + "reason_zh": "一般语义定理在存在可容许世界时，排除同一理论和情境中的正反后果。该世界存在、问题选择及所持判断的解释都是明确建模条件，不是现实保证。", + "targets": [ + "T08" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Concrete retraction slices can reverse judgments, and a conditional reporting specification disallows concealing recognized change. No automatic detector, adequate report generator or real revision history is established.", + "reason_zh": "具体撤回切片允许判断反转，条件性报告规范排除隐瞒已识别变化；没有确立自动检测器、充分报告生成器或现实修订历史。", + "targets": [ + "T09", + "T10" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Separate assumption, meaning and scope changes admit different judgments; hidden changes fail the adopted report condition. This covers explicit semantic models, not every practical ambiguity or method of concealment.", + "reason_zh": "假设、含义和范围的分别变化允许不同判断；隐藏变化违反采纳的报告条件。结果覆盖明确语义模型，不覆盖全部实际歧义或隐瞒方式。", + "targets": [ + "T09", + "T10" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.consistency.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Finite witnesses distinguish tension from contradiction and consistency from truth or completeness. Refusing to retain a demonstrated conflict is a conditional consequence of an adopted consistency requirement, not an implemented revision strategy.", + "reason_zh": "有限见证区分张力与矛盾、一致性与真或完整性。不保留已示冲突是采纳一致性要求后的条件后果，不是已经实现的修订策略。", + "targets": [ + "T11", + "T12" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Reflexive quantifies applicable owned rules and subjects, with coherent keys and meaningful application records. The concrete rule set has generation and assessment work but does not cover every possible real principle.", + "reason_zh": "Reflexive量化适用的自有规则和对象，并要求一致的标识与有意义的适用记录。具体规则集包含生成和评估工作，但不覆盖所有可能的现实原则。", + "targets": [ + "T13" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The revised module models formation purposes, requested applicability scopes and revision counterexamples with actual evaluation and generation outcomes. These finite inquiry contracts do not establish the correctness or completeness of every assessment methodology.", + "reason_zh": "修订模块通过实际评估和生成结果表示形成目的、待考察适用范围和修订反例。这些有限问题契约不确立所有评估方法的正确性或完整性。", + "targets": [ + "T13" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Applicability is retained, self-exemption fails where conditions hold, and finite self-tests plus a produced revision fail to establish universal support. The owned records and source identities are mathematical objects, not authenticated execution histories.", + "reason_zh": "适用性得到保留，条件成立时不能自我豁免；有限自测和自产修订不能确立普遍支持。自有记录和来源标识是数学对象，不是经过认证的执行历史。", + "targets": [ + "T13", + "T14" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Grounds checks identified applicable facets of the same claim; support, entailment and an option-indexed value procedure carry distinct responsibilities. This is a chosen formal interface and finite fulfillment examples, not a universal sufficient criterion for all philosophical grounds.", + "reason_zh": "Grounds检查同一主张的已识别适用方面；支持、蕴涵及选项相关价值程序承担不同责任。它是选定的形式接口与有限履责实例，不是所有哲学根据的普遍充分标准。", + "targets": [ + "T07", + "T15" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Articulation content is linked to each facet and separated from its discharge; union and missing-aspect examples prevent labels from waiving represented duties. Identifying every actually relevant aspect remains an application responsibility not solved by the datatype.", + "reason_zh": "表述内容与每个方面相连，并与该方面的履责分开；并集和缺失方面实例防止标签豁免已表示义务。识别所有实际相关方面仍是应用责任，不能由数据类型解决。", + "targets": [ + "T15", + "T16", + "T17", + "T18", + "T28" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The three modeled adapters check observational compatibility/support, semantic entailment, and value reasons with limits/consequences/criticism. Actual relevance, empirical uncertainty and the adequacy of value criticism beyond the chosen cases are not exhaustively formalized.", + "reason_zh": "三个已建模适配接口分别检查观察相容性与支持、语义蕴涵，以及带限度、后果和批评的价值理由。所选案例之外的实际相关性、经验不确定性和价值批评充分性没有被穷尽形式化。", + "targets": [ + "T15", + "T16", + "T17", + "T18", + "T28" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.assessment#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "JointAdoption requires consistent instantiated starting commitments without proving all starting assumptions. A two-reason example and heterogeneous facets avoid a universal numerical scale. They demonstrate procedural consistency, not ultimate value justification.", + "reason_zh": "JointAdoption要求起始承诺有一致的实例，而不证明所有起始假设。双理由实例和异类方面避免使用统一数值尺度；它们展示程序一致性，不提供终极价值证成。", + "targets": [ + "T15", + "T16", + "T17", + "T18", + "T28" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A proper local observation scope supports a local function claim while admitting a counterexample outside it. This establishes the specified nonentailment; it neither identifies all relevant real differences nor rules out justified wider evidence.", + "reason_zh": "真子域内的局部观察支持局部函数主张，同时容许域外反例。结果确立指定的非蕴涵，不识别所有现实相关差异，也不排除有根据的更广证据。", + "targets": [ + "T19", + "T20" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Repeated irrelevant measurements fail support, while a valid inferential assessment needs no empirical chain. This refutes a universal mandatory chain within the represented responsibilities but does not characterize every framework or measurement practice.", + "reason_zh": "重复无关测量不能提供支持，而有效推论评估无需经验链条。这在已表示责任中反驳统一必需链条，但不刻画所有框架或测量实践。", + "targets": [ + "T19", + "T20" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.scope#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A single observation has limited support and distinct trial outcomes preserve a fixed bound. Verification, reproducible conditions and conclusion stability use separate predicates; no probability distribution or general reproducibility law is proved.", + "reason_zh": "单次观察具有有限支持，不同试验结果保持固定界。核验、可复现条件和结论稳定使用不同谓词；没有证明概率分布或一般复现规律。", + "targets": [ + "T19", + "T20" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Output-only and explanation-bearing contracts concern the same process and each has its own checked Grounds; applicationVariation changes the actual objective and invalidates old evidence. No uniform real mastery or capability-level definition is derived.", + "reason_zh": "仅输出合同和附加解释合同针对同一过程，各有经过检查的Grounds；applicationVariation改变实际目标并使旧证据失效。没有推导现实中统一的方法掌握或能力等级定义。", + "targets": [ + "T07", + "T21" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.capabilities#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "A distinct assessor role supplies a proof about the exact output process while no explanation certificate is attached; duplicating four inventory kinds leaves represented capability unchanged. Role numbers and certificates do not prove external provenance or human-like understanding.", + "reason_zh": "不同评估者角色为确切输出过程提供证明，而该过程没有附带解释证书；复制四类库存不改变已表示能力。角色编号和证书不证明外部来源或类似人的理解。", + "targets": [ + "T07", + "T21" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "The adopted choice interface requires feasibility and an objective/value/constraint-linked reason and rejects status-only reasons. Its finite reason vocabulary and concrete feasibility checks do not supply a general theory of warranted real implementation choice.", + "reason_zh": "采纳的选择接口要求可行性及与目标、价值、约束相连的理由，并拒绝纯地位理由。有限理由词汇和具体可行性检查不构成现实实现选择的一般证成理论。", + "targets": [ + "T22", + "T23" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Two independent policies share a correct negative audit but differ on the added choice norm, establishing independence from the represented assessment procedure. This does not show an unsupported priority claim fully satisfies general Grounds, or derive a value commitment from neutral facts.", + "reason_zh": "两个独立政策共享正确的否定审查，却对额外选择规范一成一败，确立相对于已表示评估程序的独立性。这不表明无支持的优先主张完全满足一般Grounds，也不从中性事实推出价值承诺。", + "targets": [ + "T22", + "T23" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.grounds.implementations.limits#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Concrete cases have one feasible candidate, unequal implementations, local agreement with wider difference and four eligible internal reasons. A cheap wrong-output method shows eligibility alone is insufficient. These results concern selected candidates and contracts, not all methods.", + "reason_zh": "具体案例展示唯一可行候选、不等价实现、局部相同而更广范围不同，以及四种合格内部理由。廉价但输出错误的方法说明理由合格并不足够。结果针对所选候选和合同，不覆盖所有方法。", + "targets": [ + "T24" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "One shared model combines the charter and Grounds and assigns five commitments distinct operational reasons, limits and live criticism. Specified nonentailments prevent chapter order from doing logical work; neither the universal adoption nor ultimate justification of all commitments follows.", + "reason_zh": "一个共享模型组合章程与Grounds，并为五项承诺赋予不同的操作性理由、限度和实际批评。指定非蕴涵防止章节顺序承担推理作用；所有承诺的普遍采纳或终极证成并不随之成立。", + "targets": [ + "T02", + "T12", + "T23", + "T25", + "T26", + "T27" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles#p2", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Consistency/support and orientation/capability remain separate; changing an application objective changes its actual claim and can defeat retained evidence. Universal application compliance is only an assumed conditional interface, not an achieved fact.", + "reason_zh": "一致性与支持、取向与能力保持分离；改变应用目标会改变实际主张，并可能使保留证据失败。普遍应用履责仅由有前提的条件接口表达，不是已经实现的事实。", + "targets": [ + "T02", + "T12", + "T23", + "T25", + "T26", + "T27" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.roles#p3", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "Contentful self-application, exact own-capability assessment, the general Grounds provision and the same current philosophy method are linked in the model. Their checked coexistence supplies no self-proof, real execution guarantee or unconditional applicability.", + "reason_zh": "模型连接具有内容的自我适用、确切自有能力评估、一般Grounds条款与同一个当前哲学方法。经过检查的共同成立不提供自证、现实执行保证或无条件适用性。", + "targets": [ + "T02", + "T12", + "T23", + "T25", + "T26", + "T27" + ] + }, + { + "id": "organon.relationships.terms#p1", + "fidelity": "partial", + "reason": "FormKind includes organization, methods and principles, and an inferential assessment has no executable-test requirement. These representations illustrate the terms without exhaustively defining every existing form or every non-test assessment.", + "reason_zh": "FormKind包含组织、方法和原则，推论评估没有可执行测试要求。这些表示说明术语，但未穷尽定义所有既有形式或所有非测试评估。", + "targets": [ + "T05", + "T28" + ] + } +] diff --git a/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-targets-final.json b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-targets-final.json new file mode 100644 index 0000000..d9a6351 --- /dev/null +++ b/lean/philosophy/reviews/code-targets-final.json @@ -0,0 +1,2731 @@ +[ + { + "id": "T01", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。", + "reason_en": "No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "reason_zh": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。", + "classification": "N/E-V boundary", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "来源、规范/事实及章节角色边界得到保留；本项通过仅表示边界和来源记录合格，不代表其余27项目全部实现。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [], + "proof_and_scope": "No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "authority", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "原文SHA与冻结目标一致。数学类型不包含“所有现实系统都遵守”或哲学普遍正确性结论。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "current_code": [], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "meanings-and-limits-record", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "22单元含义、条件、表格和bullet均作为来源保留；具体语义实现缺口在相应T项判定，不能由本项通过抹去。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "current_code": [], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "roles-and-headings", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Charter/Relationships标题未被制造为True定理；来源明确Rationale/Skills不增加核心义务，组合代码未赋章节顺序以演绎权威。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "权威、采纳性质、来源全文及章节角色边界保留；这是来源与解释边界合格，不是哲学正确性定理。 No theorem establishes textual authority or universal adoption. All source meanings and limits remain authoritative; chapter order supplies no proof priority.", + "current_code": [], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T02", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。", + "reason_en": "jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "reason_zh": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。", + "classification": "W satisfiability plus N interpretation", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "jointWitness确有非空数学见证，但其反身工作与各承诺理由未达到冻结的共享、内容对应模型；较弱接口的可满足性不能算所选Core规范已联合满足。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.preamble", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Integration.jointWitness", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595", + "meaning": "Constructs one shared system/world satisfying actual judgments, full reflexivity, capability evidence, feasible choice and each interpreted commitment's Grounds; it is a bounded model, not universal philosophical correctness." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "inhabited-world-and-judgments", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "actual提供真实模型；held有能力和预算命题，观察在两个候选内识别identity，非空且非全真记录占位。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "shared-capability-and-choice", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "相同implementation用于capability、budget、observation和output choice；这一部分确有模块交互，观察推广限于封闭候选类。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "principle-process-content", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "五个对象/两种活动确非空，但Performed仅pair会员关系，原则形成理由、适用域考察和修订理由没有可表达内容；预填记录不足以完成冻结的内容性对象分支。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "补充与这些subject相连的实际评估问题/理由/范围/结果对象，并用非空记录验证相应义务；不要求现实系统已经运行。", + "current_analysis": "Reflexivity.lean:128、151、287、318、366要求并构造含问题、理由、限度和实际计算结果的ValidApplication；Integration.lean:124、129将同owner/rules/work接入Charter。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "individual-commitment-reasons", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "generation理由是两函数在0输出不同，仅推出存在不同输入；Grounds承诺字段可任意重贴而ValueProcedure不变。因此联合对象尚未提供每项承诺自身理由。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "建立每项承诺与其理由、限度及批评响应的可审查联系，保留价值承诺不必被证明为事实的边界。", + "current_analysis": "Integration.lean:282、356、364、377、389、423将各承诺的选项、后果、约束、理由及实际批评相连；反选项程序失败。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "no-priority-from-conjunction", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "合取本身未推出章节优先级或普遍哲学正确性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一个actualSystem/actual现在同时承载实质反身记录、实际能力与证据、可行选择和五项具有各自理由及限度的承诺。旧联合见证缺少的内容联系已经补齐。 jointWitness constructs a single system/world, not five unrelated existence claims. It uses computed identity output, actual observation support, coherent owned principle work, and each option-indexed commitment procedure. This is one finite satisfiability witness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Integration.lean:595" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T03", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。", + "reason_en": "Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "reason_zh": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。", + "classification": "N specification", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "Generative作为明确采纳的有限规范接口保留价值取向与当前形式可修订性，未内置必然变化或进步。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.overview", + "clause": "p3" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.Generative", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33", + "meaning": "A policy satisfies this predicate when it values the designated expansion aim and declares every current form revisable. This states no actual progress condition." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "orientation", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "worthPursuing选择理解/构造扩展这一被采纳目标；与permitsVersion字段独立。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "nonfinal-current-forms", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "∀current form→revisable覆盖组织/方法/原则及外观/产物；没有预装严格改善序列。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "no-actual-success-guarantee", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "定义不含实际transition或Expanded证明；无进步trace提供边界。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Generative保留采纳的扩展价值与所有当前形式可修订性；不会从规范接口推出真实变化或进步。 Policy fields remain independent predicates. Generative requires the adopted aim and current-form revisability; it neither executes a transition nor guarantees Expanded.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:33" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T04", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。", + "reason_en": "The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "reason_zh": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。", + "classification": "W nonentailment", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "明确非空政策允许不同版本对，但完全不赋扩展价值，足以区分许可与价值取向。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.orientation", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.permissionNotValuation", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:49", + "meaning": "Shows permission for version 0 to 1 and distinct versions coexist with failure of the generation predicate." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "permissible-nontrivial-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "允许0→1且0≠1；证明许可，不声称此变化已执行。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。 The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:49" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "valuation-independent", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Generative因所需价值取向为False而失败；不是将两个概念写成同一布尔量。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "neutralPolicy允许真正不同版本但不赋扩展价值，继续构成许可与价值取向的非蕴涵见证。 The version pair 0 and 1 is distinct and permitted, whereas the required valuation is false. Permission is not execution or actual improvement.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:49" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T05", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。", + "reason_en": "revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "reason_zh": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。", + "classification": "N/D projection and W witness", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "通用kind/version覆盖和具体可修订却无扩展见证均成立；投影性质须如实标记。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.non-finality", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.terms", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.revisabilityCovers", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "meaning": "Extracts revisability of a specified current kind/version from an assumed generation predicate; it does not revise that form." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.revisionWithoutProgress", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123", + "meaning": "Exhibits a policy meeting the generation interface and universal revisability while its independently chosen constant trace never expands." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "form-coverage", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "任意五种form kind均受∀current→revisable规范约束，包含全部必要种类。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "projection-boundary", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "只是将已采纳规范实例化，不是发明可修订性或执行修订；这正是冻结规范后果范围。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "revisable-without-progress", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "openPolicy可修订与常值baseState trace并存，每步Expanded均假。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "所有形式种类的条件覆盖及可修订而无进步的非空例子成立。 revisabilityCovers projects an explicitly assumed Generative policy. revisionWithoutProgress combines openPolicy with a constant base-state trace; possible revision is not promised progress.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:58", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:123" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T06", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "11分支均有同对象内容：三类数量膨胀不扩能，同一生成系统执行分别依赖经验/知识/协作，无外援失败，稳定动作保持所需能力并满足预算，自述对同一次变化的内容被反驳。", + "reason_en": "GeneratingSystem binds policy, current state, execution, required operations and budget. The resource deletion calls all use its execute interface. Stable action retains current content within the stated budget. Announcement carries owner, before/after, operation, input and expected output; its claimed membership/output expansion fails for inflatedState. All are explicit finite examples, not empirical laws.", + "reason_zh": "11分支均有同对象内容：三类数量膨胀不扩能，同一生成系统执行分别依赖经验/知识/协作，无外援失败，稳定动作保持所需能力并满足预算，自述对同一次变化的内容被反驳。", + "classification": "W eleven branches", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "数量与非进步分支有内容性见证；外部执行/稳定与同一系统状态的联系尚未建模，自称生成分支更只有构造器自等式，11分支未齐。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.generationLimits", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222", + "meaning": "Checks all concrete branches on the bound system: unchanged capability despite list inflation, resource dependence, justified stable action and an untrue same-object achievement report." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "GeneratingSystem binds policy, current state, execution, required operations and budget. The resource deletion calls all use its execute interface. Stable action retains current content within the stated budget. Announcement carries owner, before/after, operation, input and expected output; its claimed membership/output expansion fails for inflatedState. All are explicit finite examples, not empirical laws.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "a-orientation-without-progress", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "有价值/非终局政策且base与inflated之间无理解/构造成员增加。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "generatingSystem.policy为openPolicy；baseState到inflatedState不增加understood/constructed成员，Generative仍成立。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "b-more-artifacts", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同一before/after状态inventory复制，understood/constructed不变。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "inventory复制增长，而同一对状态的constructed/understood保持原内容。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "c-more-abstraction-layers", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "层级列表增加而同一状态的能力成员不增加。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一inflatedState增加层级列表但不增加能力成员。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "d-more-terms", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "词汇列表增加而理解/构造成员不变。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "同一inflatedState增加词汇列表但不增加能力成员。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "e-external-experience", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "Option计算确实读取experience，缺失即none；但没有标明该计算是这项Generative系统的执行，结果也不进入其状态。合取任意外部函数仅证明相容，未满足冻结同一内容系统要求。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "将政策、被执行算法、资源和before/after或执行结果纳入同一对象，再展示experience缺失的实际失败。", + "current_analysis": "GeneratingSystem.execute实际绑定assistedExecution；删去同一次调用的experience槽得到none。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "f-external-knowledge", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "knowledge依赖计算正确；同e，缺少同一系统执行绑定。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "复用同一绑定执行对象，分别删knowledge验证失败。", + "current_analysis": "同一生成系统的同一execute接口删去knowledge槽得到none。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "g-collaboration", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "collaborator缺失的Option失败正确；其同一主体/执行含义未建模。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "在上述共享执行对象中保留协作槽及单独缺失反例。", + "current_analysis": "同一生成系统execute删去collaborator槽得到none；不是独立无关函数的合取。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "h-no-autonomous-execution", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "⟨none,none,none⟩导致独立求和函数失败；没有该系统自主执行接口，不能把任意失败函数当其不能自主执行。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "明确这就是被评系统的执行接口，并把无外援调用关联其执行结果。", + "current_analysis": "该系统的execute在三个外援槽均none时失败；证明所示接口的依赖，不证明所有自主执行不可能。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "i-no-self-improvement", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "常值trace每步无Expanded；可作为所选无自我改善轨迹，不是所有系统永远不改善。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "stableTrace在每一步保持baseState，Expanded逐步失败。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "j-grounded-stability", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "StableReason给出构造内容相等和inventory越过阈值1，但没有稳定动作或被追求的预算/价值条件；阈值本身尚未关联该系统稳定选择的理由。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "把1作为明示应用约束，并证明保留当前状态的动作满足它且不丢所需能力，同时政策仍Generative。", + "current_analysis": "GeneratingSystem.stableAction保持current；requirementsMet保留所需copy操作，budgetJustified满足明确budget=1，且policy仍Generative。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "k-self-announcement-not-achievement", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "expanded=expanded只是枚举构造器自等式，不是某系统对同一变化的announcement，也没有achievement-support的失败命题。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "定义带主体、before/after和claim的实际报告，构造报告生成而同一claim不成立/缺充分支持的反例。", + "current_analysis": "inflatedAnnouncement含相同owner/before/after/op/input/output；claimedOperation=successor未成为新增能力，其实质claim被inflatedAnnouncementRefuted反驳。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:222" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T07", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "保留任意支持关系的条件推论，并新增同一次扩展的基线、测试条件、记录、非空兼容世界和Grounds；同一报告在膨胀反世界也成立，故报告不支持成就。", + "reason_en": "ConcreteAchievementExample fixes transitionBefore/After and input. A performance record distinguishes extension from inflation in the two-case world. transitionReportDoesNotSupport supplies the compatible inflation countermodel. achievementNeedsSupport uses its generic premises and separately conjoins this checked instance; it does not discharge arbitrary real achievement claims.", + "reason_zh": "保留任意支持关系的条件推论，并新增同一次扩展的基线、测试条件、记录、非空兼容世界和Grounds；同一报告在膨胀反世界也成立，故报告不支持成就。", + "classification": "D conditional fragment with N accountability", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "任意claim的support应用定理正确，但冻结要求的同一能力变化、基线和条件实例及取向/自述不提供其支持的反例没有完成。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.self-transcendence.limits", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.capabilities", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.AchievementAccountability", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "meaning": "Defines achievement accountability as exactly the same Grounds predicate, with no additional execution or achievement proof." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.achievementNeedsSupport", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217", + "meaning": "Applies supplied compatible-world support to the arbitrary actual claim and separately includes the checked concrete transition example." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "ConcreteAchievementExample fixes transitionBefore/After and input. A performance record distinguishes extension from inflation in the two-case world. transitionReportDoesNotSupport supplies the compatible inflation countermodel. achievementNeedsSupport uses its generic premises and separately conjoins this checked instance; it does not discharge arbitrary real achievement claims.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "conditional-inference", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "对任意W及claim，支持加actual兼容性推出actual处claim；没有伪称实际可靠性已证明。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "achievementNeedsSupport:217仍按Compatible与Supports前提实例化actual，另合取已检查的具体实例；泛型结论没有隐藏自动支持。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "same-change-baseline-scope", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "未把achievement实例化为同一before/after的Expanded；没有对应基线、记录内容、条件或非空支持见证。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "给变化世界/记录及明确Expanded类claim，证明非空兼容性、支持和actual结论；保留通用定理。", + "current_analysis": "ConcreteAchievementExample:193要求同一transitionBefore/After、input=0、实际Expanded、性能记录兼容与支持和Grounds；concreteAchievementExample:204构造extension。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "orientation-and-report-insufficiency", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "generationLimits只给无Expanded和标签自等式，未建立对上述achievement的support失败。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "复用同一变化世界，构造有取向/报告但兼容反世界使支持失败。", + "current_analysis": "transitionReportDoesNotSupport:186复用同一报告和inflate兼容反世界，反驳transitionAchievement的Supports。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "accountability-interface", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "别名能存对应claim但value分支允许理由/commitment脱离，不能作为完整成就规范接口的完成证据；也没有achievement实例履行。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "将实际成就的适用经验/推论面与同一claim绑定，检查匹配的Grounds；不要由规范接口宣称真实成就已获证。", + "current_analysis": "transitionAccountable:172按同一achievement的实际经验方面构造Grounds；ValueProcedure的修复另由T15审查。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:125", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:217" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T08", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。", + "reason_en": "Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "reason_zh": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。", + "classification": "D theorem and W countermodel", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "通用语义与非空见证阻止同题正反结论；实际三前提冲突显示不能仅逐项检查。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.consequenceConsistency", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "meaning": "Given an admissible witness, proves that no question can have both signed consequences. The witness is an explicit premise." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.jointConflict", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59", + "meaning": "Exhibits individual models of each of three claims, then proves their conjunction has no model." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "simultaneous-and-implications", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Theory含全部选择命题，Entails/Consequence量化所有模型，包括实际蕴涵而非仅扫描字符串列表。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "same-context-noncontradiction", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同一admissible witness使正反结论矛盾；不存在证明现实理论必有model的隐藏步骤。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "joint-conflict", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "三个单项分别有Bool-pair模型，联合P、P→Q、¬Q无法满足；关键反例内容真实。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "显式可满足前提支持同题同条件的一致性；三项各自可满足但联合冲突的实际见证保留。 Consequence quantifies admissible worlds under one theory/context; a supplied admissible witness refutes simultaneous positive and negative consequences. Empty question types remain a vacuous boundary, not evidence of substantive completeness.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:31", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:59" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T09", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。", + "reason_en": "Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "reason_zh": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。", + "classification": "W retraction and context models", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "时间切片撤回旧命题后保留相反命题的可满足性及联合冲突明确；三种上下文变化分别有非空见证。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.revisionCanReverse", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "meaning": "Exhibits satisfiable time-zero and time-one slices whose union is unsatisfiable. No temporal update mechanism is implemented." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.contextDifferences", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102", + "meaning": "Proves that changing any one of assumptions, meaning, or scope can reverse polarity, with explicit admissible witnesses in all displayed contexts." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "retraction-and-opposite", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "旧/新slice分别有true/false模型，联合无模型，编码的是撤回后的状态而非永久兼容要求。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "slice-consistency", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "slice显式给Satisfiable而非直接Consistent；在空附加假设/全scope的自然问题上下文中，可由同一非空model一般定理得到一致性，未引入实质源外前提。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "assumption-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "固定问题含义，仅世界假设true/false变化，正反后果各有admissible witness。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "meaning-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "假设固定true，meaning改为等于true/false，反转判断而各context非空。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "scope-change", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "假设为空、meaning固定，scope改选true/false；不要求跨context一致。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "撤回后反转、假设变化、术语含义变化和适用范围变化各自有非空实例，不要求跨条件永久兼容。 Each revised slice has a concrete model; their union conflicts. The three context examples vary assumptions, meaning and scope separately. Slice satisfiability supplies the witness needed for the general consistency theorem.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:78", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:102" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T10", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。", + "reason_en": "TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "reason_zh": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。", + "classification": "N/D specification consequences plus W examples", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "单向报告规范、语义变化反例、表示顺序不变以及独立revisionIdentity触发均达到冻结的规范接口范围；并未实现自动检测。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.meaning", + "clause": "p2" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.semanticChangeMustBeReported", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "meaning": "Instantiates the reporting interface with a supplied change proof; it cannot discover changes on its own." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.representationOrderIrrelevant", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "meaning": "Proves swapping the order of two singleton components leaves theory membership unchanged." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.hiddenContextChangeRejected", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160", + "meaning": "Rejects false reports for three concrete context changes and a revision-only change; also shows reporting true does not make an incompatible assumption hold." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "semantic-change-report", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "held/context语义成员、meaning、scope差异均触发报告责任；报告真不反推变化，无不报告变化的许可。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "representation-order", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "union两个singleton的顺序变化不改变命题集合；仅覆盖这种表示变化。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "hidden-context-changes", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "分别对assumption/meaning/scope构造¬SameContent，使false报告违反规范。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "independent-revision", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同content但revisionIdentity从0到1也禁止false报告；外部已识别文字/形式修订必须由调用方赋正确identity，不宣称代码检测了全部变化。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "report-not-adequacy", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "true报告仍与新assumption在true实际world不成立并存，不为修订内容背书。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "语义变化必须报告的条件规范、表示顺序不变、独立revisionIdentity变化和隐藏条件变化反例均保留。 TruthfulReport is an assumed one-way obligation. SameContent compares semantic content and the separate revision identity is also checked. The result is not an automatic change detector and report=true does not establish adequate reporting.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:142", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:150", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:160" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T11", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。", + "reason_en": "The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "reason_zh": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。", + "classification": "W witness plus D norm consequence", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "两约束有共同可行值但非同一谓词；同条件正反后果明确违反一致性。修订责任是采纳规范的条件后果，未声称已实现修订算法。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.tensionWithoutContradiction", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:186", + "meaning": "Exhibits overlapping lower/upper budget bounds while proving that the two predicates differ. This is a concrete compatible-constraints example." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.conflictRequiresChange", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:195", + "meaning": "Given both signed consequences for one question, proves inconsistency as defined. It does not construct a repair or establish which premise should change." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "tension-without-conflict", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "预算5同时满足不同上下界，0证明两谓词不等；有限模型展示不同目标不等于不可同时满足。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。 The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:186", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:195" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "conflict-requires-nonretention", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "同题同context正反后果使Consistent失败；在采纳一致性规范下不能原样保留该状态。未提供哪一项应改的价值判断或算法。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "具有共同可行解的张力与同条件不相容后果已区别；不保留冲突是已采纳一致性约束的后果。 The tension example shares a feasible value without equating the value predicates. conflictRequiresChange assumes a consistent retained theory and uses conflicting consequences to refute retaining all incompatible content; it does not construct a revision algorithm.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:186", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:195" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T12", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。", + "reason_en": "Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "reason_zh": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。", + "classification": "W truth and coverage separation", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "Bool模型具体区分可满足性与指定实际world真值，并给指定问题的双向非蕴涵；其现实重要性不由数学裁定。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.consistency.limits", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.relationships.roles", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.consistentFalse", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:205", + "meaning": "Exhibits a satisfiable Boolean singleton theory that fails at the separately chosen world false; satisfiability is not truth at every world." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.consistentIncomplete", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:216", + "meaning": "Shows the empty Boolean theory is satisfiable while entailing neither the true-world claim nor its negation." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "false-assumption", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "singleton w=true可满足但在指定false world不成立，足以展示一致理论不自动为实际真。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。 Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:205", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:216" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "undecided-relevant-question", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "明确检验w=true这一选择问题，两个Bool模型使正反均不被emptyTheory蕴涵。问题被指定为关注对象；未证明任何现实问题的重要性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "模型可满足与指定实际世界为真不同；一个明确问题的正反结论均不蕴涵，故一致性不保证真或充分。 Bool witnesses separate model existence from truth at the selected actual world. The incomplete case has admissible worlds on both sides of its question; philosophical importance of that question is supplied by interpretation.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:205", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:216" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T13", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "Reflexive现在要求一致的原则登记、同所有者对象、实际问题/理由/范围/结果及方法契约；形成、应用、修订内容已由有限评估与生成函数实际计算。", + "reason_en": "ValidApplication checks owner/key resolution, inquiry and method identity, nonempty target-linked reasons, limits and the registered meaning. ownContentEvaluates proves separate stated outcomes match the evaluator. All nine subjects receive assessment; generation excludes application-phase subjects by explicit applicability. Insufficient results are valid assessments, not correctness proofs.", + "reason_zh": "Reflexive现在要求一致的原则登记、同所有者对象、实际问题/理由/范围/结果及方法契约；形成、应用、修订内容已由有限评估与生成函数实际计算。", + "classification": "N specification; projections are not executions", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "系统/原则/三阶段和两类活动的条件覆盖已表达，但原则形成理由、适用域审查及修订理由仍只由活动标签代替，未完成冻结的完整规范对象。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.meaning", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.Reflexive", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151", + "meaning": "Requires a coherent registry and a valid recorded application for every applicable same-owner subject and registered rule; this remains a model compliance condition." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "ValidApplication checks owner/key resolution, inquiry and method identity, nonempty target-linked reasons, limits and the registered meaning. ownContentEvaluates proves separate stated outcomes match the evaluator. All nine subjects receive assessment; generation excludes application-phase subjects by explicit applicability. Insufficient results are valid assessments, not correctness proofs.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "objects-and-activities", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "系统、原则、formation/application/revision过程均有独立constructor/phase；generation和assessment两个活动均在非空ownRules中。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Subject包含system、principle、principleProcess三阶段；ownSubjects:226含9个对象，generatingRule与assessingRule分别生成/评估。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "applicability-conditions", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "owner和rule.applicable是独立条件；自我身份不取消已适用规则的记录义务。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Reflexive:151先检查登记一致，再量化已登记、同owner且applicable的rule/subject；生成不适用于application阶段是明确条件而非自我豁免。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "formation-reasons-scope-revision-reasons", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "没有任何subject关联的形成理由、适用域考察或修订理由字段/问题/评估内容；十个预填活动pair无法区分“仅合规自查”与来源要求的多问题审查。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "增加最小的assessment-question/content接口并关联原则及对应phase；明确三个问题均在责任范围，以非空解释性记录/实例证明覆盖。无需证明现实评估已发生。", + "current_analysis": "inquiryFor:172、sourceReasonContents:180、assessInquiry:191分别编码形成目的/范围、适用范围问题和onlyAtZero在1失败的修订反例；ownContentEvaluates:287检查预定结果确等于算法结果。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:151" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T14", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。", + "reason_en": "noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "reason_zh": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。", + "classification": "D conditional projection and W boundary cases", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "适用性与有限检验反例通过；自产修订分支没有与同一主体/旧新对象关联的自我产生事实，仅演示任意局部生成函数的观察不足。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.charter.reflexivity.limits", + "clause": "p1" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.noSelfExemption", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "meaning": "Instantiates full reflexivity at a registered applicable same-owner subject, then extracts its performance record." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.applicabilityRetained", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "meaning": "Derives record scope from full reflexivity, proves its classical conditional/disjunctive equivalence, and gives a valid restricted example with no system assessment." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Agency.selfTestDoesNotProve", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "meaning": "Computes success on sample 1 and failure at 0, refuting universal success. This concerns the particular arithmetic predicate, not a universal impossibility theorem about all self-tests." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.selfOriginDoesNotSupport", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616", + "meaning": "Retains the local observation countermodel and adds an actual owned before/after revision with the same unsupported global claim." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "no-self-exemption", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "对同owner且适用的rule直接得到要求的record；不把identity与applicability等同。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "nonapplicable-boundary", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "application-only规则可被履行而system assessment缺失；说明不能忽略条件要求所有自应用。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "finite-self-test-not-universal", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "实际all运算在[1]通过，0使n+1=2n失败；有限内部测试不提供普遍正确性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "无自我豁免和适用条件保留；有限自测仍不证明普遍正确；自产修订现在与同一owner、before和after相连且有局部变化但全局失败。 noSelfExemption projects applicable owned obligations, not unconditional applicability. applicationWork is a nonempty restricted example. OwnedRevisionExample ties a producing process to prior and output functions; evaluation at zero changes, while the compatible counterworld fails at one. Origin supplies no global support.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "self-origin-of-revision", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "证明生成函数f只在0为true且zero observation不支持allTrue，但未表示它是某系统自身生成的修订，也无修订前对象。作为局部观察反例有效，作为冻结自产修订分支欠对象联系。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "增加最小producer/owner及before/proposed关系或共享系统构造，让其自身生成该candidate，并保留当前内容性support反模型。", + "current_analysis": "Evidence.lean:581–616将GeneratingProcess.owner、prior和outputRevision绑定ProducedRevision；OwnedRevisionExample同时有实际0处改变和1处失败的支持反例。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:165", + "CoreReader/Reflexivity.lean:407", + "CoreReader/Agency.lean:275", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:616" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T15", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。", + "reason_en": "ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "reason_zh": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。", + "classification": "D semantic support fragment plus N Grounds", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_reason": "结论弱化与范围缩窄定理成立；完整Grounds规范中的价值理由对应当前claim仍无检查，不能以该较弱接口代表全部来源责任已保留。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.Grounds", + "kind": "definition", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "meaning": "Grounds packages a nonempty facet list, coverage of a supplied applicability predicate, common claim identity, articulation presence/alignment, and every listed facet's discharge. It is not uniformly a truth certificate for the claim." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.supportWeakening", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "meaning": "Preserves support when a supported claim implies a weaker claim at every world; it does not weaken the record set." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.scopeRestriction", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245", + "meaning": "Restricts a universally supported property from a wider input domain to an included narrower domain, for arbitrary world and input types." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "same-claim-support", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "记录含实际test/result，经验/推论facet的claim与target必须相等；不是无解释support布尔字段。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "conclusion-weakening", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "假设同记录支持p及p→q，推出支持q；另有删记录会失支持反例，不混淆证据弱化。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "scope-restriction", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "将结论的量词域从wide缩为included narrow；不扩张观察域，也不补造现实可靠性。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "articulation-and-aspects", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "概念/假设/理由/限度可储存，facet对齐并要求所有声明适用面，经验加非空in-scope world排除矛盾观察空真。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "Grounds逐方面要求同一主张、对应表述与履责；价值接口改为选项/结果/目标/约束/理由，并要求联合可采纳世界，消除了任意重贴commitment及不一致起点通过的问题。 ValuePosition derives commitment from selected=adopted and specializes reasons to the adopted option. ValueProcedure requires nonempty reasons, JointAdoption, scoped consequence under all stated reasons and an actual criticism response. It is a chosen procedural adapter, not a complete universal theory of good reasons or fulfillment by every application. Weakening and scope restriction remain explicit conditional theorems.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "value-reason-correspondence", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "ValueProcedure不读取commitment或starting；替换任意不相关commitment不改变通过性。理由只需推出另一个任意consequence，不能确保陈述的是此立场的理由。False-commitment探针不是要求价值立场证明为真，而是揭示对应关系缺失。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "给可审查的立场/理由相关性与后果关系接口及非空实例，允许未证明的价值起点，拒绝不相关重贴和纯自断言；不必强制reason逻辑推出commitment。", + "current_analysis": "Evidence.lean:28–59中commitment由selected/adopted导出，reasons依选项变化；JointAdoption排除无可满足起点。switchPosition实际后果匹配选项，并拒绝反选项与不可能起点。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "full-compliance-versus-interface", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "rejected", + "previous_analysis": "当前接口还允许空limits和恒定非空字符串使关键责任空真；原文保留适用性，但此代码不能由字段存在声称已经开放于相关批评。", + "previous_minimal_fix": "为作为完成见证的实例给实际适用世界和内容相关批评/响应，不把整个通用域强行设非空，也不将接口当现实履行证明。", + "current_analysis": "Grounds是采纳接口；每个已列facet都须同claim、匹配表述并履责。有限实例表明部分实际履行，不能把定义或空适用列表读作所有现实责任已经履行。", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:112", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:228", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:245" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T16", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。", + "reason_en": "Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "reason_zh": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。", + "classification": "D union theorem and W mixed case", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "面向义务的并集/标签不变和同一switch claim的经验＋价值缺责反例完整；规范接口局限另见T15。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.assessmentUnion", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "meaning": "Proves that discharging the union of two applicability predicates is equivalent to discharging each separately." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.labelsCannotWaive", + "kind": "theorem", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "meaning": "Proves changing labels cannot change duties because labels were ignored by definition; no external classification mechanism is analyzed." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.mixedMissingResponsibility", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362", + "meaning": "Shows a discharged empirical facet does not discharge a union of applicable facets when an included value facet has no reasons." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "union-not-exclusive", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "Facet是单面向枚举，但适用关系可同时选多个facet，union定理合并义务而非强制单选。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "unlabeled-duty", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "空标签不改变applicable责任；这是显式规范设计的定义后果，非实证分类器。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "actual-mixed-claim", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "switchEmpirical与unsupportedPosition同为w=true的主张；经验面实际discharged，价值面reasons=[]使义务失败，非两个无关claim标签。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "three-facet-and-articulation-elements", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "四类表达要素和三种责任接口独立存在；本项通过不认可ValueProcedure是完整价值正当性判定器。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "义务并集、标签不能豁免以及同一switch主张的经验加价值缺责反例成立；canonical表述按方面实际内容构造。 Grounds quantifies applicable facets independently of labels and checks every listed facet. The mixed example omits a truly applicable value facet of the same claim, so empirical discharge alone fails. The three facet constructors model responsibilities, not mutually exclusive exhaustive philosophical kinds.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:261", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:272", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:362" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T17", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。", + "reason_en": "Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "reason_zh": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。", + "classification": "W countermodels", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "所列不充分替代物有实际内容反模型；非蕴涵未被说成结论恒假。价值反例只证明所示理由/预算责任失败，不是价值真理。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.articulationNotSupport", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "meaning": "Proves this articulation passes the nonemptiness check while its assumptions do not entail that the world is true." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.measurementRepeatNotSupport", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "meaning": "Combines explicit countermodels showing that repeated measurement of one coordinate does not support an unmeasured coordinate or a budget consequence, and does not fix the announcement value procedure." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Logic.compatibilityNotEntailment", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "meaning": "Shows that adding a claim can remain satisfiable even though the original empty theory did not entail that claim." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.selfAssertionNotReason", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478", + "meaning": "Combines empty-reason and nonempty-but-budget-irrelevant self-assertion failures, with a joint adoption witness for the latter." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "articulated-not-established", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "非空concept/reasons但emptyTheory不支持w=true；另有不相关articulation与facet对齐失败。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "measurable-not-relevant-or-correct", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "第一coordinate可测且重复结果稳定，第二coordinate可true/false；单次和重复均不支持未测结论。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "repeat-not-value-reasons", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "action=true记录与budget0和3都兼容，无法支持budget consequence；非空announcement自述仍未履行价值reason→consequence检查。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "compatibility-not-entailment", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "加入w=true与emptyTheory相容，但emptyTheory并不蕴涵它；有true/false反世界。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + }, + { + "branch": "self-assertion-not-reason", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "既有空reason反例，也有非空真自述在budget0不能推出所声称后果的内容性反例。", + "previous_minimal_fix": null, + "current_analysis": "表述清楚、测量/重复、相容与自述均有实际不足反模型；价值反例针对对应选项的预算后果，不能冒充价值命题恒假。 Counterworlds invalidate support or entailment while preserving the stated observations or compatibility. unrelatedArticulationRejected ties articulation content to the facet. Self-assertion has empty reasons or fails the option-specific consequence, rather than being rejected merely for its label.", + "current_code": [ + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:377", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:451", + "CoreReader/Logic.lean:229", + "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:478" + ], + "minimal_fix": null + } + ] + }, + { + "id": "T18", + "status": "accepted", + "reason": "有限价值立场有可满足但无需自证的起点、选项相关理由、限度、后果和批评响应；两理由联合充分而各自不足，异类方面无需统一尺度。", + "reason_en": "switchPosition has a checked admissible joint adoption and rejects the opposite option and impossible starts. jointReasonPosition combines benefit/cost premises with counterworlds showing neither alone supports the consequence. No theorem proves the ultimate worth of the adopted value or every starting assumption.", + "reason_zh": "有限价值立场有可满足但无需自证的起点、选项相关理由、限度、后果和批评响应；两理由联合充分而各自不足，异类方面无需统一尺度。", + "classification": "W/N procedural satisfiability", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_reason": "具体switch价值立场有成本/收益理由、限度、非空批评响应及可满足起点，并未从空理论推出承诺；异类支持不用统一数值尺度。", + "source_refs": [ + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p1" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p2" + }, + { + "unit": "organon.grounds.assessment", + "clause": "p3" + } + ], + "required_declarations": [ + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.valueWithoutSelfProof", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:493", + "meaning": "Exhibits a coherent reasoned position not derivable from empty assumptions, and rejects opposite-option, inconsistent-start and impossible-adoption variants." + }, + { + "name": "CoreReader.Evidence.heterogeneousReasons", + "kind": "case", + "location": "CoreReader/Evidence.lean:564", + "meaning": "Combines empirical, inferential and value examples with a genuine two-reason combination that neither reason alone establishes." + } + ], + "proof_and_scope": "switchPosition has a checked admissible joint adoption and rejects the opposite option and impossible starts. jointReasonPosition combines benefit/cost premises with counterworlds showing neither alone supports the consequence. No theorem proves the ultimate worth of the adopted value or every starting assumption.", + "findings": [ + { + "branch": "reasons-limits-consequence-openness", + "status": "accepted", + "previous_status": "accepted", + "previous_analysis": "成本/收益理由与所选择true选项有具体关系，推出cost